mitnick-digest Sunday, November 8 1998 Volume 01 : Number 193 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Wed, 4 Nov 1998 06:21:36 -0800 (PST) From: drobje@yahoo.com Subject: [mitnick] Yahoo! Mail Auto-Reply Je mail is ontvangen. Gezien de drukte duurt het ongeveer 4 dagen voordat de mail beantwoord wordt. http://www.geocities.com/Area51/8495 - -------------------- Original Message: >From owner-mitnick@phalse.2600.com Wed Nov 04 14:21:35 1998 Return-Path: Received: from 2600.com (HELO phalse.2600.com) (205.136.158.2) by mta107.yahoomail.com with SMTP; 4 Nov 1998 06:21:34 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by phalse.2600.com (8.8.8/8.8.6) id IAA04683 for mitnick-outgoing; Wed, 4 Nov 1998 08:59:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from mayo.nais.com (root@mayo.nais.com [205.229.212.3]) by phalse.2600.com (8.8.8/8.8.6) with ESMTP id IAA04679 for ; Wed, 4 Nov 1998 08:59:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from [205.229.214.38] (ppp-214-38.jericho.nais.com [205.229.214.38]) by mayo.nais.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA03627 for ; Wed, 4 Nov 1998 08:58:08 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Sender: bic@pop.nais.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <199811040416.UAA00960@mail1.eni.net> References: Subject: Re: [mitnick] Protest Add DarkJedi, JediMasta and a couple others to that list.... ~hugh field (DarkJedi) Brian wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > I was wondering if there was going to be any protests soon in the Los > Angeles Area? > > i know of afew people that would go up and be all we can be; yell, scream, > pass out flyers, all that shit. > > well, i live in san diego county, and i know of atleast 1 person on this > list and 4 of my friends that would most likely make it up there: > > bonq, wicked klown, circlejerk, evil azrael, brainkandy (me), and spectraz... > > well, latez. > -brain kandy- > > Free Kevin Mitnick - Visit www.kevinmitnick.com > ICQ: 6635525 AIM: Msie Kandy > E-mail: brainkandy@mindspring.com > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.5.3 > > iQA/AwUBNj5p3i7sph9laBOUEQL0wACeJjAUPKU+yycD4BfIJEsYjlf5qk8An2D8 > dagdZ8KqVFMz3nsdhg68bwQ3 > =yo+h > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- - -- ********************************hugh field****************************** | redtide@serve.com | PGP public key @ www.serve.com/redtide/pgp.txt | ************************************************************************ | God: "If I were to tell you that there is an army of angels waiting | | in Heaven, and on the Day of Judgement they will be unleashed upon | | the world to slay all the unbelievers, what would your response be?" | | Response: "Pre-emptive nuclear strike." | ************************************************************************ ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 4 Nov 1998 10:42:08 EST From: Bobwil623@aol.com Subject: Re: [mitnick] arik's comprehensive statement in re k.m. let me send my thanks to arik for a thoughtful analysis of the state of media reporting on kevin's case to date. apologies in advance for a long post. a few comments and questions follow... > I won't tell you I'm different. I'm NOT willing > to risk my career for Kevin. But to accurately > report what happened would NOT be something that > would risk my career... hmmm.... if "accurately report[ing] what happened" includes an analysis of the violations of journalistic standards and ethics by markoff, as well as powerful, factual criticism of the nytimes' editorial process, my guess is that your reputation might, in fact, suffer. the nytimes has been known to work against the interests of those who oppose them. just a thought. > I recently pitched a story to a major magazine > that would have examined the coverage of the > Mitnick case from beginning to end, paying close > attention to possibility (though I suspect most > here treat it as fact) that Markoff was not an > unbiased party when he picked up the Mitnick > story for The Times... as i wrote in the "more boilerplate" post i contributed to the list, i've been doing media analysis for 18 years (with increased intensity for the past 10 years). any reasonable level of media analysis would conclude that markoff violated multiple journalistic standards and ethical guidelines. at some point, "possibility" shifts to fact for reasonable people. markoff has never been held accountable for these gross ethical -- and possibly legal -- violations. i'm encouraging the list to consider that holding markoff accountable for getting rich by trashing someone on the front pages of the nytimes -- on three separate occasions -- is extremely important to advancing the public discourse about kevin mitnick's treatment by the courts and the media. if i had the front page of the new york times at my beck and call, i'd have newt gingrich in chains within six months (it took markoff 7 months to get kevin, and no one knew who kevin was when markoff started). > He has already devoted a major section of his > Cyberpunk book to Kevin... note, too, that markoff's then-wife/co-author (of "cyberpunk") kate hafner has since written about (in esquire magazine, i believe) talking her way past the prison guards at raleigh while kevin was incarcerated there. hearsay has it that kevin was called to the attorney room (a secure place for confidential meetings with counsel), only to find kate hafner waiting for him -- "how did *you* get in here? i'm not talking to you," kevin is alleged to have said. holding an edition of "cyberpunk," hafner repeated the behavior she displayed while first writing "cyberpunk," when she attempted to coerce kevin into talking with her without paying kevin for the interview: at the prison, hafner is alleged to have said to kevin, "we're putting out the 2nd edition of the book -- now's your chance to correct the things you said were wrong." kevin again refused to speak with her. the disparaging personal comments and factual inaccuracies (let's be direct: "lies") remain in cyberpunk, to the best of this writer's knowledge. not only do we have markoff demonstrating repeated violations of journalistic ethics, but also, if this story is true, his ex-wife violated *federal prison rules* in an attempt to coerce a prisoner into giving potentially incriminating evidence to a non-attorney, and without the detainee's attorney present. to the best of this writer's knowledge, no reports of this event have surfaced since hafner's report of the event in esquire (again, not sure if esquire is the correct citation). sounds like markoff and hafner were made for each other (what's that about a "den of thieves"?). if their behavior were made public in a well-documented structural and contextual analysis of their "reporting" (in quotes advisedly), they would be subject to the public and professional condemnation they deserve. > You want to do something about [kevin's treatment in the media]... > Remind these editors simply, briefly, and > firmly, that there is more than one viewpoint in > the Mitnick case, and that there are lingering > questions about how his case came to become such > a priority for federal prosecutors in the first > place... this mirrors my suggestion to the list exactly. again, i'd have newt gingrich in chains if i had access to the front page of the new york times. in an especially damning indictment of markoff's integrity, he claims (!) that he had "no idea" that nytimes' editors would run his initial report on kevin mitnick on the front page (7.4.94, if i'm not mistaken). apparently, this is a blatant lie. *no* articles appear on the front page without *intense* scrutiny of the implications of those articles, by some of the smartest people you'd ever like to smack some sense into. markoff is suggesting that in the days and weeks he was writing that initial story that he never had *any* formal or informal indications from or discussions with his editor that the story was considered for prominent placement on the front page. if true, this is unlike any organization i've ever studied: "prizes" (front page placement) for meritorious behavior (a salacious story that made the incomprehensible internet a "threat" by vilifying a single person) in a bureaucracy like the nytimes are discussed in detail in hallway conversations before they're ever awarded. markoff's claims in this regard beg credibility, and could readily be proven or disproven during a libel trial. > If you raise sufficient questions about the case > in the minds of the right reporters, you might > get somewhere with this... again, this mirrors my approach exactly. i strongly recommend support for arik's recommendation in this regard. > Reporters really do want to get it right... agreed, but only if "right" in this context means "what the editor wants to hear/read," which typically has little to do with some notion of factual reality. the nytimes coverage of the sandinista government is a textbook example of justifying government murder (the covert war against nicaragua) in the corporate media. there are structural reasons why editors and journalists have vested interest in ensuring they are in agreement about the focus of any article printed by the paper. see "manufacturing consent" by chomsky and herman as the single best intro to this topic that i've read. for anyone who's read this far, thanks for your time. and thank you, arik, for a thoughtful contribution to a complex issue: when the nytimes blames you for something that isn't your responsibility, how do you respond effectively while indigent and detained for 3 years and 9 months without a bail *hearing*? ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 3 Nov 1998 21:32:04 -0500 From: Mike Blaguszewski Subject: Re: [mitnick] Forbes Article On 11/3/98 at 3:53 PM, BackRowSka@aol.com wrote: > on! Well, I would like to hear feedback on this article from other people > which states Kevin as being "A martyr to hackers" which martyr is defined in > Websters "a person who sacrifices something of great value and esp. life > itself for the sake of principle." If you are going to buy Forbes it is the > one with the general on the front. I would say that Kevin is a martyr by your definition. He has sacrificed something of great value to him (his freedom for 3.5 years) for a cause (his belief in his own innocence and a general repugnance at what the government is trying to do with his case). He could have taken a plea bargain initially, but he chose to have his day in court instead (although I doubt he thought it would take as long as it has). Mike Blaguszewski ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 4 Nov 1998 17:28:30 EST From: Phoenxknt@aol.com Subject: Re: [mitnick] Yahoo! Mail Auto-Reply In a message dated 98-11-04 09:19:30 EST, you write: << Je mail is ontvangen. Gezien de drukte duurt het ongeveer 4 dagen voordat de mail beantwoord wordt. http://www.geocities.com/Area51/8495 >> Pardon, mon francaise eel mové. Qui est? Vous comprenhd Anglais por quia? Merci Mon Ami, - - Jojo (je-mappelle d'un francaise) ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 04 Nov 1998 20:04:36 PST From: "AnGeL oF DeAtH" Subject: Re: [mitnick] Yahoo! Mail Auto-Reply Ahh....Hate to be shrewed but could somebody translate this? I took intro spanish and aced and flunked spanish 1 so im not going to understand french very well. I mean I know like 1 word out of the whole thing but hey you know.... _______________________________________ | | |AnGel oF DeATh | |We all go sometime | |---------------------------------------| |ICQ-->8369754 | |E-Mail-->hells_angels_666@hotmail.com | |---------------------------------------| |FREE KEVIN | |_______________________________________| >From: Phoenxknt@aol.com >Date: Wed, 4 Nov 1998 17:28:30 EST >To: mitnick@2600.com >Subject: Re: [mitnick] Yahoo! Mail Auto-Reply >Reply-To: mitnick@2600.com > >In a message dated 98-11-04 09:19:30 EST, you write: > ><< Je mail is ontvangen. Gezien de drukte duurt het ongeveer > 4 dagen voordat de mail beantwoord wordt. > http://www.geocities.com/Area51/8495 >> > >Pardon, mon francaise eel mov=E9. Qui est? Vous comprenhd Anglais por qui= >a? >Merci Mon Ami, >- Jojo (je-mappelle d'un francaise) ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 4 Nov 1998 23:50:54 -0500 From: Arik Hesseldahl Subject: [mitnick] wanna vent about the media? As a follow up to my spleen venting, I'm posting this little item I ran across. Perhaps those of you with AOL accounts will find the new board described herein useful in airing your views about coverage of Kevin. Maybe not. Just a thought. From Wired News http://www.wired.com/news/news/culture/story/16054.html Brill Launches Board by Polly Sprenger 5:22 p.m. 4.Nov.98.PST Brill's Content, the magazine for mediaphiles, launched a media complaint board Wednesday on its America Online page (keyword: brills). The board will accept letters from companies, organizations, and individuals who think they've been unfairly treated by the media. Editor Steven Brill said the new project is "the opposite of navel-gazing.... This is for people who have the least access to other venues." Any letter will be considered for publication on the board, Brill said, but the writer must present a substantive complaint. For example, the board is not a venue for complaints about unfavorable restaurant reviews. The board will also allow media organizations to respond to posted allegations. One of the first letters posted on the board is from Ford Motor Company. The automaker complains that an upcoming Dateline NBC exposé about electrical malfunctions in Ford vehicles is misleading. Another letter from the Consumer Product Saftey Commission complains that an article in Chicago Magazine is inaccurate. Dick Babcock, editor of Chicago Magazine, said he welcomes Brill's discussion forum, although he stands by the article his publication ran on the death of a small child. "We're very proud of our story, but they certainly have a right to complain," Babcock said. Ford's letter regarding Dateline NBC raises a different issue, according to Babcock, "Ford filed a complaint before the episode even aired." Brill's Content will post Chicago Magazine's response to the CPSC's allegations on the site tomorrow. Brill said the site will be posted exclusively on AOL through January, when he hopes to renegotiate his deal with the online service. In return, AOL provided Brill's Content with resources to promote the new site. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1998 01:23:00 -0800 (PST) From: Support Services Subject: Re: [mitnick] response to support services On Wed, 4 Nov 1998 08:57:59 -0500, Arik Hesseldahl wrote: > With that, I'm finally going to take your advice, > support services, and shut up. You did an *excellent* job of replying, and I agree with most of what you said. You've held your ground well, even in the face of unrelenting adversity. I respect your reply -- you cut through the delivery of my message and addressed the substantive issues therein. Job well done... congratulations. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 05 Nov 1998 03:15:56 -0800 From: JP Subject: Re: [mitnick] wanna vent about the media? At 11:50 PM 11/4/98 -0500, you wrote: >As a follow up to my spleen venting, I'm posting this little item I ran >across. Perhaps those of you with AOL accounts will find the new board >described herein useful in airing your views about coverage of Kevin. Maybe >not. Just a thought. This is one of the ideas with the most potential I've seen come from this list. Funny thing is, if you read the "What We Stand For" sidebar in Brill's Content (or the letter from Steven Brill @ ) you'll notice that the magazine claims to be against the treatment Kevin has received from the media on all points. A quick summary: Accuracy - everything reported should be accurate "in fact and in context" Labeling and Sourcing - any information that _may_ be inaccurate should be left out or labelled as unsure. In addition, possibly inaccurate info should have some indication of any biases or prejudices the source may have Conflicts of Interest - the only motive of the journalist should be to inform the public, and he should not be concerned about currying favor with advertisers Accountability - journalists should be held accountable for their reporting, and should "correct mistakes of fact, context, and fairness prominently and clearly" If this is a sincere belief set, Brill's Content should be _very_ interested in Kevin's case. It will provide them an opportunity to provide truths that haven't been reported in most of the media before, and the additional opportunity to show how screwed up the rest of the media is. Optimistic, I know. But what the hell. Just keep writing those letters, because people are starting to listen and it won't be long now 'til we can't get 'em to shut up about it. And maybe this time around they'll get it right. - JP ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1998 06:56:12 -0500 (EST) From: Macki Subject: [mitnick] more inaccuracies As we struggle to dispel the myths about Kevin that are repeatedly posed as fact, I was saddened today to come across a libelous letter published in this week's AntiOnline Mailbag. "Lets look at it like this he stole credit card numbers. If he or anyone else would steal mine I would want the guy dead and I would be more than happy to do it myself. He's not a good guy he wasn't fighting for anything other than his own greed for money..." Oh great! 20,000 Netcom customers are supposed to want Kevin dead for something he didn't do. To add insult to injury, the editor responded to this letter, but mentioned nothing of the fact that Kevin never stole any credit card numbers. Oh well, I suppose this is just one more media outlet to write to. Although I wouldn't have thought that we'd have to write to AntiOnline for something like this. Macki ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1998 12:18:00 -0500 From: gjones@raleigh.ibm.com Subject: Re: [mitnick] Yahoo! Mail Auto-Reply It's French and German accually. hells_angels_666@hotmail.com on 11-04-98 11:04:36 PM Please respond to mitnick@2600.com To: mitnick@2600.com cc: (bcc: Gregory Jones/NWSMEL) Subject: Re: [mitnick] Yahoo! Mail Auto-Reply Ahh....Hate to be shrewed but could somebody translate this? I took intro spanish and aced and flunked spanish 1 so im not going to understand french very well. I mean I know like 1 word out of the whole thing but hey you know.... _______________________________________ | | |AnGel oF DeATh | |We all go sometime | |---------------------------------------| |ICQ-->8369754 | |E-Mail-->hells_angels_666@hotmail.com | |---------------------------------------| |FREE KEVIN | |_______________________________________| >From: Phoenxknt@aol.com >Date: Wed, 4 Nov 1998 17:28:30 EST >To: mitnick@2600.com >Subject: Re: [mitnick] Yahoo! Mail Auto-Reply >Reply-To: mitnick@2600.com > >In a message dated 98-11-04 09:19:30 EST, you write: > ><< Je mail is ontvangen. Gezien de drukte duurt het ongeveer > 4 dagen voordat de mail beantwoord wordt. > http://www.geocities.com/Area51/8495 >> > >Pardon, mon francaise eel mov=E9. Qui est? Vous comprenhd Anglais por qui= >a? >Merci Mon Ami, >- Jojo (je-mappelle d'un francaise) ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1998 12:44:34 -0800 (PST) From: rOTTEN Subject: Re: [mitnick] more inaccuracies On Thu, 5 Nov 1998, Macki wrote: > As we struggle to dispel the myths about Kevin that are repeatedly posed > as fact, I was saddened today to come across a libelous letter published > in this week's AntiOnline Mailbag. > > "Lets look at it like this he stole credit card numbers. If he or anyone > else would steal mine I would want the guy dead and I would be more than > happy to do it myself. He's not a good guy he wasn't fighting for > anything other than his own greed for money..." Very interesting that someone who is charging Mitnick with theft of a string of numbers is willing to murder him. It's amazing what people will kill over. I remember back when you had to threaten a person's physical safety to be snuffed. I guess if you steal numbers and concepts and thoughts and emotions you get the same punishment. Actually, that might not be so bad...a global death penalty for all crimes and misdemeanors. Tell a lie? Death. Take a paper clip home from work? Death. Break up with your girlfriend? Heads up! Death. > To add insult to injury, the editor responded to this letter, but > mentioned nothing of the fact that Kevin never stole any credit card > numbers. What was the nature of the reply? > Oh well, I suppose this is just one more media outlet to write > to. Although I wouldn't have thought that we'd have to write to AntiOnline > for something like this. I guess Support Services was right after all... <..rOTTEN..> nobody move, nobody get hurt error187(1) critical failure - - - - - - To do: 1) Update my "To do" list. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 06 Nov 1998 10:20:00 +0000 From: kerry Subject: [mitnick] kevinmitnick.com updates watchtower has added these reference links to the indictment document - http://www.kevinmitnick.com/indictment.html -- http://www.kevinmitnick.com/indictment.html#companies - companies who allegedly suffered from alleged criminal activity http://www.kevinmitnick.com/indictment.html#isp - ISPs and edu institutions who allegedly suffered from alleged criminal activity http://www.kevinmitnick.com/indictment.html#wire - description of alleged wire fraud activity http://www.kevinmitnick.com/indictment.html#date - timeframe of alleged criminal activity http://www.kevinmitnick.com/indictment.html#password - password possession sample letters index - http://www.kevinmitnick.com/letters/ - if u have any sample letters or guidelines you think would be helpful, email me. This is a good time to write letters; we still have a couple of months before the trial. http://www.kevinmitnick.com/pictures has some pictures - if any of you have digitized others that would be useful for flyers, websites, whatever, let me know and i can add them. more additions coming soon... *********************************************************** F R E E K E V I N http://www.KevinMitnick.com ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1998 14:30:21 -0800 (PST) From: Support Services Subject: Re: [mitnick] kevinmitnick.com updates > http://www.kevinmitnick.com/pictures has some pictures - if any > of you have digitized others that would be useful for flyers, > websites, whatever, let me know and i can add them. I believe there were more "Free Kevin" pictures at http://www.babe.net/ right under the "FREE KEVIN Now!" button, on a graphics that says "Cover-Up? Exposed!" Very interesting... ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 07 Nov 1998 23:23:24 +0000 From: kerry Subject: [mitnick] Forum discussing Kevin case and site - ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Sat, 07 Nov 1998 11:09:57 PST From: Susan l To: kerry@2600.com Cc: ozsite@mailexcite.com Subject: My Site's Forum: We're Discussing Your Site/KM > I host a site for the HBO dramatic series on prison life, OZ (Barry > Levinson/Tom Fontana co-exec producers). My site's unofficial. It's > home to a lot of fans. The forum is wildly popular -- 20,000+ posts in a > year and a half, counting all the old threads we had to zap to keep the > load down. > > We have a thread going on Kevin's case, and your site. The person who > started it told us about your site. > > Free free to tell others about the forum, and encourage them to join in > on the debate. Most of those posting notes are interested, but know > little about the case, or the delays. > > I am also deeply interested in prisoners' rights, sentencing, > prosecutorial misconduct, etc. I've added links to some very good sites > with info on the home page: > > www.accessone.com/~susanhu/oz/index2.html > > top of the site: > www.accessone.com/~susanhu/oz/index.html > > Direct link to the forum > (JADA Productions lets us use a forum server): > http://www.discussionontheweb.com/oz/ > > Best to you, Susan > > > http://www.accessone.com/~susanhu/oz/ > Send all e-mail to: ozsite@hotmail.com > --- > http://www.accessone.com/~susanhu/lyn/VirtualPort.html > (IE4.0 only) > http://www.accessone.com/~susanhu/lyn/VP2.html > (other browsers) > > ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 7 Nov 1998 18:36:37 EST From: BadGirlnLA@aol.com Subject: [mitnick] Petersen on the run? A reliable source at MDC said that the U.S. Marshal's office was in the "Rainbow", a club on Sunset Boulevard in West Hollywood, showing Petersen's picture to the people at the club. This occurred last night. If this is true, Petersen may have broken his probation once again. Has anyone heard anything new about "Agent Steal"? I am going to run a check on courtlink to see if they have any information to verify his status. ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 7 Nov 1998 18:40:04 EST From: FallOut4E@aol.com Subject: Re: [mitnick] Forum discussing Kevin case and site Has anyone thought about making a forum on www.kevinmitnick.com ? I think that would be a good way for people to communicate without having to get 20 emails a day. Although there hasn't been many posts lately. Just a suggestion. ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 7 Nov 1998 19:28:34 EST From: BadGirlnLA@aol.com Subject: [mitnick] Warrant for Petersen 7/17/98 PROBATION FORM 12 filed as to Justin Tanner Petersen Approved by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. Praying that the court will ord iss of a bench warrant addressed to any US Marshal or any other auth officer w/in the USA., requiring the dtn and rtn of Justin Tanner Petersen before the US District Court at L.A., CA, to show cause why the supv order, heretofore ent. should not be revoked. (vf) [Entry date 07/21/98] 59 7/30/98 NOTICE TO SUPERVISED RELEASE VIOLATOR filed and signed by Justin Tanner Petersen on 7/28/98 (vf) [Entry date 08/04/98] 60 7/31/98 BENCH WARRANT returned executed as to Justin Tanner Petersen 7/27/98 (vf) [Entry date 08/04/98] 61 8/6/98 NOTICE OF HEARING as to Justin Tanner Petersen ; probation revocation hearing set for 11:00 8/24/98 for Justin Tanner Petersen (vf) [Entry date 08/06/98] 62 8/24/98 MINUTES OF SUPERVISED RELEASE REVOCATION HEARING held before Judge Stephen V. Wilson as to Justin Tanner Petersen (1) count 1s: Court finds Justin Tanner Petersen in violation of supervised release. Court orders supervised release of Justin Tanner Petersen reinstated on same terms and conds as prev imposed plus he is to reside in a Community Corrections Ctr for 4 mos as dir by PO and is to participate in a progr of pyschological/psychiatric treatment as dir by PO. Crt ord dft released forthwith. Issd release to USM. C/R: Gary George (ibar) [Entry date 08/28/98] 68 8/27/98 ORDER filed by Judge Stephen V. Wilson as to Justin Tanner Petersen: Order of reinstatment on supervised release: Dft h/b reinstated to supervised release on same terms and conds as prev imposed, plus to reside at a Community Corrections Ctr as dir by PO and to participate in progr of psychological/psychiatric treatment as dir by PO. (cc: all counsel) (ibar) [Entry date 08/31/98] [Edit date 09/01/98] 64 9/18/98 AMENDED ORDER OF REINSTATEMENT ON SUPERVISED RELEASE fld by Judge Stephen V. Wilson as to Justin Tanner Petersen: Entered 9/21/98 (cc: all counsel) (ibar) [Entry date 09/21/98] 65 9/30/98 PROBATION FORM 12 filed as to Justin Tanner Petersen. Approved by Judge Stephen V. Wilson: Praying crt will ord iss of b/w addr to any USM or any other auth officer w/in USA req detn and ret of dft bef USDC @ LA, CA, to show cuase why supv ord heretofore ent should not be revoked. (ibar) [Entry date 10/01/98] - -- 9/30/98 WARRANT FOR VIOLATOR OF PROBATION/SUPERVISED RELEASE issued for Justin Tanner Petersen by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. Court orders Justin Tanner Petersen detained. (ibar) [Entry date 10/01/98] ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 7 Nov 1998 23:59:45 EST From: Phoenxknt@aol.com Subject: Re: [mitnick] Forum discussing Kevin case and site In a message dated 98-11-07 18:43:57 EST, you write: << Has anyone thought about making a forum on www.kevinmitnick.com ? I think that would be a good way for people to communicate without having to get 20 emails a day. Although there hasn't been many posts lately. Just a suggestion. >> You don't want the mail, don't join the list bro. - -Absolute Matter ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 8 Nov 1998 00:06:47 EST From: Baritoner@aol.com Subject: Re: [mitnick] Forum discussing Kevin case and site good idea ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 8 Nov 1998 00:39:56 EST From: FallOut4E@aol.com Subject: Re: [mitnick] Forum discussing Kevin case and site I do want the mail, that why I'm on the list, but I thought that I and other people might like the forum better and they are very convenient. You can search through them which can come in handy. Also, for people that aren't on the list, they can still view the contents, and make posts. In a message dated 11/8/98 12:03:18 AM Eastern Standard Time, Phoenxknt@aol.com writes: > In a message dated 98-11-07 18:43:57 EST, you write: > > << Has anyone thought about making a forum on www.kevinmitnick.com ? > I think that would be a good way for people to communicate without having > to > get 20 emails a day. Although there hasn't been many posts lately. Just a > suggestion. > >> > > You don't want the mail, don't join the list bro. > > -Absolute Matter > > ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 07 Nov 1998 21:51:51 -0800 From: Brian Subject: [mitnick] Mitnick Digest - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Ok, how do you join the mitnick list digest? it slipped my mind, and my friend wants to get that... he is interested in mitnick as well as i am, but just doesnt have time to check his e-mail 200 times a day like me. well, latez. -brain kandy- Free Kevin Mitnick - Visit www.kevinmitnick.com ICQ: 6635525 AIM: Msie Kandy E-mail: brainkandy@mindspring.com - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.5.3 iQA/AwUBNkUxdi7sph9laBOUEQLYjQCgn3RYz2UlO7ENz9w+vkM73D9BvhEAn2Bl dzE+LkA61Zw6wAa5e6FBWhxf =T8nd - -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 08 Nov 1998 07:32:49 +0000 From: kerry Subject: [mitnick] Info on Justin Petersen > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > Date: Sat, 07 Nov 1998 22:19:06 -0800 > To: kerry@2600.com > Subject: Justin Petersen > > As you probably know, Justin Petersen is the one who originally set Kevin > Mitnick up for probation violation, and set into motion the series of > events which placed Kevin Mitnick where he is today. Justin Petersen was > originally to be a star witness against Kevin Mitnick, however, after > committing additional crimes while himself on bail, he too became a > fugitive and was later captured and spent 41 months in prison. Upon > release from prision, Justin was placed on several years probation. Justin > still had value as a witness, but this time for the defense, as the > government would have to explain why they released such a hardcore criminal > such as Justin and paid him to set Kevin Mitnick up. About three months > ago, Justin was himself taken back into custody for probation violation for > not obtaining employment in the well over one year he had been released. A > month later they released him and one month later, he once again > disappeared and is again a fugitive. The timing of all of this is telling, > as Mitnick is scheduled to come up for trial in only a couple of months. > The government never hauls people back in after one year for failure to > gain employment. The disapperance is very strange. Stranger still is the > fact that is has been kept somewhat under wraps by the U.S. Marshalls > Service. I think Justin Petersen's latest fugitive status needs to be well > publicized, as he might well be cornerstone of Mitnick's defense. I will > post information on my site http://www.justinpetersen.com as it becomes > available. Please link to my site and try to get the word out about Justin > Petersen. I will have real court documents on the site come Monday. > > > Ron Austin > *********************************************************** FREE KEVIN bumperstickers http://www.mindspring.com/~jump0 *********************************************************** PO Box 17435 - Raleigh NC 27619 - email jump0@mindspring.com checks/money orders payable to "Free Kevin Publicity Fund" *********************************************************** Stickers are sold at cost plus postage - we make no profit from this effort - donations are split equally between Kevin's Defense Fund and the Free Kevin Publicity Fund. *********************************************************** F R E E K E V I N http://www.KevinMitnick.com ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 8 Nov 1998 12:58:49 -0500 From: Mike Blaguszewski Subject: Re: [mitnick] Mitnick Digest On 11/7/98 at 9:51 PM, Brian wrote: > Ok, how do you join the mitnick list digest? it slipped my mind, and my > friend wants to get that... he is interested in mitnick as well as i am, > but just doesnt have time to check his e-mail 200 times a day like me. Send an email to majordomo@2600.com with a message body that reads: subscribe mitnick-digest You might want to put it in the subject field too, just to be sure. Mike Blaguszewski ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 8 Nov 1998 14:35:49 EST From: BadGirlnLA@aol.com Subject: [mitnick] Mitnick t-shirts I recently received some of the merchandise being sold on this list. The shirt with the "free kevin" on the front and "www.KevinMitnick.com" on the back looks good. The shirt is a good quality cotton. However, the rubber-like letters are pretty bad. This is the type of stuff that peels off when washed, and it just looks cheap. Please silk screen the lettering on the shirts or use some other way to do the printing. The black shirt with the gold or white print is the best looking one. Pens are outstanding. They are ballpoint pens with black lettering, "free kevin" on a neon yellow/green background, and on the other side, www.KevinMitnick.com. Pencils-----what can you say about pencils! They have the same info printed on them as the pens, black print on a yellow/gold background. ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 8 Nov 1998 16:23:03 EST From: BadGirlnLA@aol.com Subject: [mitnick] Backstabbing Snitches BEWARE OF RON AUSTIN Ron Austin is a snitch like Justin Petersen. Some sources believe they may both be government informants at this time. Isn't it nice and convenient that Austin took over Petersen's site. Registrant: Ronald Austin JUSTINPETERSEN2-DOM P.O. Box 641133 Los Angeles, CA 90064 US Domain Name: JUSTINPETERSEN.COM Administrative Contact: Austin, Ronald RA5604 garbageman@PACIFICNET.NET (310) 358-9993 Technical Contact, Zone Contact: NameSecure NAM2-ORG admin@NAMESECURE.COM 925-377-1212 Fax- - 510-377-1414 Billing Contact: Austin, Ronald RA5604 garbageman@PACIFICNET.NET (310) 358-9993 Record last updated on 17-Oct-98. Record created on 03-Oct-98. Database last updated on 8-Nov-98 04:46:37 EST. Domain servers in listed order: DNS1.NAMESECURE.COM 205.229.232.10 DNS2.NAMESECURE.COM 209.133.34.248 ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 08 Nov 1998 15:19:59 PST From: "TelePhreak ." Subject: Re: [mitnick] Mitnick Digest i must have deleted the post that said this, but what exactly is the mitnick digest? - - - - - - - - ->Phone Rangers<- - - - - - - - - - - F -TelePhreak R Email: AcidHak@Hotmail.com E mIRC: TelePhrk E ICQ: 10886438 K Aol Instant Messanger: TelePhrk 0 E NPA: 908 (NJ) V http://phonerangers.home.ml.org/ I - - - - - - - - ->Phone Rangers<- - - - - - - - - - - N ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 8 Nov 1998 16:13:45 -0800 (PST) From: "Sara E. Cowling" Subject: Re: [mitnick] Mitnick Digest the digest is all the day's posts in one big email. -Sara Elizabeth Cowling C:\DOS C:\DOS\RUN RUN\DOS\RUN Have a nice day! On Sun, 8 Nov 1998, TelePhreak . wrote: > i must have deleted the post that said this, but what exactly is the > mitnick digest? > > - - - - - - - - ->Phone Rangers<- - - - - - - - - - - F > -TelePhreak R > Email: AcidHak@Hotmail.com E > mIRC: TelePhrk E > ICQ: 10886438 K > Aol Instant Messanger: TelePhrk 0 E > NPA: 908 (NJ) V > http://phonerangers.home.ml.org/ I > - - - - - - - - ->Phone Rangers<- - - - - - - - - - - N > > > ______________________________________________________ > Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com > ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 8 Nov 1998 19:17:22 -0500 From: "Bachrach" Subject: Re: [mitnick] Backstabbing Snitches - -----Original Message----- From: BadGirlnLA@aol.com To: mitnick@2600.com Date: Sunday, November 08, 1998 4:57 PM Subject: [mitnick] Backstabbing Snitches >BEWARE OF RON AUSTIN > >Ron Austin is a snitch like Justin Petersen. > Domain Name: JUSTINPETERSEN.COM That's justin peterson you mean. justinpeterson.com (the right way to spell it) has been registered to Petersen Tanner though... weird. justinpetersen.com (wrong way to spell it) has been registered to Austin (as you pointed out), and it forwards you directly to some geocities page that badmouthes the hell out of Justin/Heinz/steal ALso, it used to be a page where the author claimed that he was the *real* Justin petersen (spelled it wrong), and acted like an egotistical S.O.B. Both incidentally are hosted by the same domain, so I'm beginning to think that they're both controlled by Austin. (Is steal even allowed to use a computer?) For those of you who don't know, Austin and Peterson hate each other, which would explain a lot. ------------------------------ End of mitnick-digest V1 #193 *****************************