UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,               )        No. 98-50241
                                        )
          Plaintiff-Appellee,           )        DC# CR-95-881-MRP
                                        )        Central California
vs.                                     )
                                        )        ORDER
KEVIN DAVID MITNICK,                    )
                                        )
          Defendant-Appellant.          )
                                        )
________________________________________)

Before:  SCHROEDER, TROTT AND FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges


	Appellant's motion for revocation of the district court's

pretrial detention order is denied.  The government was shown, by

a preponderance of evidence, that appellant constitutes a flight

risk and that, therefore, there is no condition or combination of

conditions which will reasonably assure appellant's appearance.

See 18 U.S.C. 3142(e).  The government also has shown, by clear

and convincing evidence, that appellant poses a danger to the

community.  See United States v. Reynolds, 956 F.2d 192 (9th Cir.

1992).

	The district court's detention order is

AFFIRMED.