This party has privacy director and does not accept unidentified calls. To allow this person to see the name and number of the phone you are calling from, please press 1. Or to identify yourself by recording your name, press 2. The telephone keeps ringing, so I ripped it off the wall. I cut myself off shaving, now I can't make a call. We couldn't get much worse, but if we could, we would. One day we bombed our best, it's great for worse. I hope that's understood. One day we bombed! Thank you. Thank you, Mike Kyle. Yes. Out there in Skypeland, we have Rob T. Firefly. Good evening. We have Gila. Good evening. And we have Alex. I'm here. Good evening. Um, okay. Well, you know, we weren't on last week. We had some technical issues. We could talk about that, but we're not going to because we have so much else to talk about. And it's not important. Uh, the important thing is we're here this week and you, our listeners, hopefully are here as well. And we have a lot to talk about, but, um, I'm going to ask, um, if you could indulge me for a moment, I just want to read an excerpt of something that it means a lot to me. It's, it's something that, um, has inspired me over the decades. In fact, it's, it's one of the reasons why I have my name, uh, the name I use. Uh, it's the book 1984 by George Orwell. I'd like to read, if I may, the last two paragraphs of that incredible book written in 1948, published in 1949. And, um, particularly apropos, I think the voice from the telescreen was still pouring forth its tale of prisoners and booty and slaughter, but the shouting outside, it died down a little. The waiters were turning back to their work. One of them approached with the gin bottle. Winston, sitting in a blissful dream, paid no attention as his glass was filled up. He was not running or cheering any longer. He was back in the ministry of love with everything forgiven, his soul white as snow. He was in the public dock, confessing everything, implicating everybody. He was walking down the white tiled corridor with the feeling of walking in sunlight and an armed guard at his back. The long-hoped-for bullet was entering his brain. He gazed up at the enormous face. Forty years it had taken him to learn what kind of smile was hidden beneath the dark mustache. Oh, cruel, needless misunderstanding. Oh, stubborn, self-willed exile from the loving breast. Two gin-scented tears trickled down the sides of his nose. But it was all right. Everything was all right. The struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Brother. I'm not sure if you all remember the story a couple of years ago. Actually, I think it was 2021. This guy named Roman Pratasevich was on a plane. A plane that was forced down in Belarus. He was a dissident blogger from Belarus. And the plane was forced down so that he could be dragged off of it and arrested. He begged the people on the plane, don't do this. Don't land the plane. They will kill me. I'm a refugee. And that plane, escorted by a Belarusian MiG-29 fighter jet, was forced down. It landed. And Pratasevich was promptly arrested. You guys remember that? I remember that story. But you might not know. And this happened just over a year ago, maybe closer to two years ago. So, he reemerged. He reemerged with a different attitude. He said this on camera shortly after being released. I'm insanely thankful to the country and personally to the president. In a long interview on state television, he apologized to the riot police, who defended the country during the mass protests of 2020, which had been the largest in Belarus since the fall of the Soviet Union. He claimed he had been ordered to stir up the protests to create a pretext for international sanctions against Belarus. He denounced his girlfriend, Sofia Sapega, who was arrested alongside him and had been sentenced to six years in prison. Why should I leave, he said on state television. It's very good here. There are a lot of young people. Everyone is walking. The birds are singing. The goal of President Lukashenko was simple and clear, said Frenak Villakorka, chief of staff to the exiled Belarusian protest leader, where Svetlana Sik has, you know what, I'm not even going to try, I'm sorry, but exiled Belarusian protest leader. The goal was simple and clear, to break the personality of Roman, make him the instrument, the tool of Lukashenko's policy. And he achieved it. Lukashenko was elected yet again, a week ago someday, with this former dissident standing by his side, helping him win again. Yeah. He loved Big Brother now, too. It was fiction in 1949. It's reality today. And it's not a reality that is limited to places like Belarus, because what we've seen here in this country over the past couple of weeks, only a couple of weeks, particularly over the last few days, we have seen some unbelievably Orwellian developments. More than 8,000 webpages across more than a dozen U.S. government websites have been taken down since Friday afternoon, according to the New York Times. As federal agencies rush to heed President Trump's orders, targeting what words are approved and what words are not. More than 3,000 pages from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, including 1,000 research articles filed under preventing chronic disease, STD treatment guidelines, information about Alzheimer's warning signs, overdose prevention training, vaccine guidelines for pregnant people. More than 3,000 pages from the Census Bureau, the vast majority of which are articles filed under research and methodology. Other missing pages include data stewardship policies, documentation for several data sets and surveys. More than 1,000 pages from the Office of Justice Programs, including a feature on teenage dating violence, and a blog post about grants that have gone toward combating hate crimes. More than 200 pages from Head Start, a program for low-income children, including advice on helping families establish routines and videos about preventing postpartum depression. More than 180 pages from the Department of Justice, including all state-level hate crime data, and seven pages discussing anti-LGBTQ hate crimes. Close to 150 pages from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, including more than 50 press announcements about the use of the National Disaster Distress Helpline in the aftermath of shootings or natural disasters. More than 100 pages from the Food and Drug Administration, including more than 60 regulatory guidelines on topics such as increasing diversity in clinical trials, and the potential for addiction and abuse in drug trials. I could continue for another half hour listing all of this. But what we're seeing is basically revisionism, changing the language, changing history, changing the words we use, changing the values that we hold. And it's only the beginning. Now, I know a lot of people won't be happy that we're talking about this. They would prefer that we talk about exploits and security holes and things like that. But what bigger exploit or security hole could you possibly imagine than what we have seen over the past few days, where an unelected billionaire is basically perusing through treasury.gov, having access to every check written by the government, including your Social Security information. Unelected. And even if you were elected, it still would constitute an incredible security breach. This is one of the biggest security breaches in all of history. So, yes, we are going to discuss it. And we're going to discuss it in a way that is not kowtowing to those who imagine themselves in charge. Because this is WBAI, where we believe in free speech, we believe in debate, we believe in analysis, and we will continue to cover all that is forbidden in the mainstream. That includes migrant rights, reproductive rights, trans rights, diversity, black history month, free speech of all sorts, foreign aid, corporate regulation, climate change, clean energy, mass transit, science, health, vaccines, education, history, immigration, democracy, transparency, dissent. We have a lot to talk about. Welcome, everybody. Hi there. Alex, I understand you made the newswire today. I did, actually, yeah. And I guess this is a way to tie in tech to this, the Orwellian nature of the way you had set up this preamble. So, well, I'll say, I'll preface this. Over the weekend, I had an idea pop into my head. I had recognized that within the .gov top level domain that's used for governments in the United States, primarily just the United States, state and local as well as federal governments, there were some interesting things that were popping up. And I thought to myself, well, look, I do all of this DNS monitoring and coding with respect to zone files and things. And quite literally, this idea just popped into my head on Saturday night about how I could monitor the .gov top level domain for additional registrations that were located within it, as well as things that were removed from the .gov top level domain. And so Sunday morning, I got to work and I coded what had popped into my head. And on Saturday, I wrote the code, wrote a proof of concept, started working. And then I expanded it so I can use this on all top level domains now. But I wrote it primarily to track and monitor .gov. And so every day I've been watching the new things that are popping up in .gov, mostly state and local websites and .gov domains and things. But then today, two weird domains popped up that seemed particularly, well, at least one of them seemed particularly off brand for the current administration. And believe it or not, it was DEI.gov. That was registered last night. So I passed that particular domain as well as another one that was rather interesting, waste.gov over to Raphael Satter over at Reuters, who then had a source confirm that it was in fact the White House that registered these particular domains. And he wrote a story about it. So that ended up in Reuters today that DEI.gov and waste.gov were registered. And I think it's particularly interesting that both of these terms are found within Trump's January 20th executive order with respect to DEI and stamping out waste in the federal government. So the use for these particular .gov domains remains to be seen. None of them resolve at the moment. If you look up the WHOIS data, it indicates that the registrar and organization associated with these domains is actually CISA, the Cybersecurity Infrastructure Security Agency. But it's obviously very clear that given the anti-DEI policies of the Trump administration, DEI.gov will certainly not be used to promote DEI initiatives. Rather, as I speculated in the Reuters article, it's much more likely that DEI.gov is going to be used to rail against DEI policies and possibly to shame companies or agencies that don't fall in line with the administration's philosophy with respect to the eradication of DEI policies. So, yeah, ended up in the news today for a bit of coding. That popped into my head Saturday, and I wound up writing on Sunday. So, pretty cool to see that idea bear fruit so quickly. Did you happen to look at the name servers for these newly registered domains? Alex, you're muted somehow. Okay, Alex, while you figure out how to turn your microphone back on, I'll tell people... Are you back? Yeah, sorry. Yeah, there are no name servers associated with the domains. They're just registered. They don't actually have any... I got to correct you there. That's... If you do a who is, you'll see there are two name servers, both of which are cloudflare.com. One is called Earnest. One is called Wally. Oh, that's new. Yeah. That's new. That's brand new. That must have just happened. Okay. And all of the work that, quote-unquote work that Elon Musk and his minions minions are up to right now, that can be traced back to Cloudflare as well. So that's something very interesting. Yeah. I mean, this is interesting. So there's still no IP address, though, associated with the domains. I mean, you can't ping them in any way, so they're not resolvable. But this does indicate to me that the presence of these name server records, it indicates to me that they are in the process of configuring these domains to have some kind of content. And I would say probably within the next day or so, we're going to see content on DEI.gov and Waste.gov. Now, what's going to happen on Waste.gov? Waste.gov, well, I speculated in the Reuters article today that perhaps that's going to be some kind of running kill list for federal programs or things that the DOGE employees, and perhaps we should talk about that a little bit as well, Emmanuel, because you had some activity there. But the programs and things that the DOGE employees or minions, as you might want to call them, had essentially slashed from the federal budget, perhaps starting with USAID. Interestingly, DOGE.gov is also a domain, also using Cloudflare as name servers. I suspect these are all being run by the same people. We do have a couple of IPs for DOGE.gov, D-O-G-E dot G-O-V. And there's not much on that webpage at the moment anyway. I'm sure more things will be there. I don't know what kinds of possible security holes they might have. It's just really weird to see these kinds of things happening. But 172.67.131.28 is one of the IPs. The other one is 104.21.3.190. Now, there are a couple of IPv6 IPs as well, but I believe they go to the same place. So they're pretty much the same as those. I would suspect that the IPs for DEI and Waste.gov may very well be the same. We'll find out soon enough. Kyle, go ahead. Is Cloudflare name service implying that they are aware that these particular sites will be under scrutiny and more or less attacked or getting a lot of attention, so to speak? Well, I can't crawl into their heads and think like they do, but it's quite possible. Does that benefit for name service specifically or the site, even though it doesn't have an IP? Like, there's nothing necessarily to direct the attention to. Not, yeah. It offers, I imagine what they believe is a level of obscurity, perhaps being protected. Yeah. I've never really had to set it up myself, but I'm sure not a lot of people are familiar, but from what I understand, that's a service that helps mitigate certain types of denial of service and other kinds of attacks that are pretty common. And it's one of, I think, probably several in an industry of services that provide that for sites that, you know, may be controversial or be otherwise attacked. Rob, deal. I haven't heard from you. I'm just looking at doge.gov right now. As you said, not much comment so far. There's a blank page that at the top says an official website of the United States government. Then there is the banner department of government efficiency. The people voted for major reform and a little image of a dollar sign. That image is hosted on image delivery.net, which is a cloudflare domain. And looking at the source, there is a hidden link, a link rel, which is pointing to x.com slash doge. Yes, Alex, go ahead. Yeah, to further Kyle's point with respect to cloudflare, I deal with them constantly, all the time. They are ostensibly used to mitigate against distributed denial of service attacks. They're a content delivery network. But essentially what a lot of threat actors do that are using domain names maliciously, let's say for a credentials harvesting or phishing or impersonation, what have it, any kind of malicious type of activity, they'll very often configure the domain to utilize cloudflare as a content distribution network. And what it does is it obscures who the actual host is. So it becomes very, very difficult to figure out who's actually providing internet connectivity to this particular domain name without having to go through cloudflare to get it. Now, there are some other tricks and things that you can do in order to get behind cloudflare and figure out which service is providing connectivity. But for the most part, it really does obscure who the host is and prevents takedown requests from being sent to the host and also prevents the host from being subject to additional DDoS attacks. Okay. Well, interesting. Now, we should also point out, this is not just about registering new domains. This is about private citizens being empowered to march into offices, kick people out who are legitimately employed there, and basically gain access to some of the most sensitive data imaginable, data about all of us, pretty much. And no oversight, no transparency, just a lot of threatening and intimidation. In fact, some of the threatening went so far as to say, if you identify who is doing this, you will be prosecuted. You will be in a lot of trouble, which of course led to the people behind us being identified. In fact, at 2600, we went right back onto Twitter. This is why you keep the Twitter account, by the way. This is why. So that you can speak directly to them. If you leave, yeah, you can still speak, but you're speaking to the people that agree with you. This is how you reach those people who are committing the crimes, who are up to this skullduggery. And basically what we said was there is nothing illegal about naming inexperienced people currently accessing sensitive government data at the behest of Elon Musk. And they are Akash Baba, Edward Karstein, Luke Farator, Gautier Kohl-Killian, Gavin Kligger, and Ethan Chautran. This is a major security breach. Now, we did this with the full realization that action could be taken, but instead of action being taken, word spread even more. And these names have rightfully so become commonplace. you know, I don't think any of us are encouraging any kind of threats, certainly not violence or anything like that, just transparency, just what the hell is going on? Who are these people that now have access to all of our data? This has got nothing to do with who you support. Although, it's really interesting to see the kinds of responses that we got for daring to post this information. I should point out Blue Sky, Mastodone, kind of disappointingly, universal thumbs up and acceptance. Kind of like to debate a little bit, but everybody there seems to be on the same page. Okay, fine. I guess there's worse things. On Twitter or X, whatever you want to call it, there was widespread approval, but also a good bunch of people that took umbrage at daring to reveal this information. I want to read a couple of the responses without any usernames or identifying information. I think this is a great opportunity to reveal government shouldn't be this big. It shouldn't have that much data. Okay, fair point. Government is too big. Government does have a lot of data. data. But is this the way to handle it? To send in an anonymous army of basically college kids working at the behest of Elon Musk, giving them full access to government systems and domains and private information and not telling you what they're up to? Is that the right way to reduce the data? I think that's the right way to spread the data to all kinds of people all around the world. And we're going to find out about that. Here's another. What happened to the hacker community? We used to fight against big government. Now you all seem to cheer for it. Like these assholes are clearly corrupt, but because the orange man is doing it, then it's not good. Talk about not seeing the forest through the trees. Okay. We didn't mention Trump's name once. All right. It's not about him. We're talking about Elon Musk, who is a true threat. All right. Somebody who made a Nazi salute two weeks ago. We're not talking about that anymore, are we? Because he's moved on to bigger and better things. We're talking about a security breach unlike any other. A security breach from within. At the behest of people who were duly elected. It doesn't make it right. And we used to fight against big government. Well, what are we fighting against right now? People seem to forget who's in charge. Here's another. I remember back when hackers were all about the free flow of information. Not so much anymore. Not sure when or why that changed. Okay, let me tell you something, genius. We never were in favor of people's private information flowing all over the damn place. And that's apparently what we're looking forward to now. Because Elon Musk has just been given access to all of it. And that's supposed to be okay? We're supposed to just bow down and say thank you, Mr. Billionaire. You're going to take care of us. We trust you. Were hackers ever that stupid? I don't think so. So don't tell me that this is something new. That we're not holding on to our values of the past. If anything, we've strengthened those values. And we're standing up to something bigger than we've ever stood up to before. Okay, here's another one. You oppose exposing the privileged and corrupt and encourage violence against the investigators, which we did not do. That just means you're just a goon carrying water for those with money, privilege, and power and cosplaying as if you're a freedom fighter. Okay, the absurdity of this, it's so, it's delicious. It really is. We are carrying water for those with money, privilege, and power while you apparently are defending all these billionaires that for some reason you think can't do anything wrong and that have your back and care at all about you. I mean, really? How do you say that with a straight face? I don't know if you said this with a straight face. You typed it, but still, it's nuts. Okay, this on the subject of USAID being shut down and attacked. What's crazy to me is that USAID has long been known as a tool of the CIA, if not an outright front. There's some truth to that. There's some truth to that. But let me finish the quote first. I learned this from leftist slash liberal thinkers at least a decade ago, if not more. We are truly in the upside down. Well, not so much because we're not kidding ourselves. Yes, there's all kinds of skullduggery going on in all kinds of agencies, but you have to weigh the good against the bad. And what's happening right now is the bad. And what USAID did in the past, sure, there was some collaboration with CIA operatives, but there was also a hell of a lot of good. just look around, look at all the funds that were given to people who needed them, to countries that were struggling. And yeah, it could be done better, but this, this is not the path to that. This is the path to cutting everything off and letting people suffer and no accountability. accountability. Watching 2600 crash out over young hackers following a mission they believe in to cut government waste was not in my bingo card, but I guess here we are. All right, well, I'll put the bingo card down for a second and listen. Young hackers following a mission they believe in? You know, I wish I knew it was that easy. You know, because I used to be a young hacker. I used to believe in missions. I didn't know I could just walk into a government office and take it over and just get all the data and somehow make it better. Boy, you know, would have been a different world if I had that kind of option. All right, well, one final comment here. We just don't have the time. The government employees in Doge acting at the behest of the elected POTUS is democracy, even if he's directing them to do something dumb. Bureaucrats being insubordinate to elected officials, is the opposite of democracy. Not sure how Dems and their allies are losing that point. Well, you know, there are aspects to government that are not part of somebody who was just elected. There are people who have been in particular organizations for years, decades, and they are legitimate. You can't just say they don't count. They don't have allegiances to one party or another, and that's important. It's important to have people like that running things, because otherwise everything becomes a battle. Everything becomes some sort of struggle between one side or another, and you have the Orwellian change of language, where all of a sudden this word is bad, or this website must disappear. And when you have some kind of a constant, something that continues from one administration to the other, well, that's what keeps things from going completely crazy. And now things are going completely crazy. You wonder why. So, yeah, you know, Trump being elected, yeah, that was democracy, and I think everybody admitted to that. We weren't happy with it, but we admitted to it. What's happening right now, that's a coup. That is a coup from within the winning side. It's basically a power grab, a way of taking more, a way of getting vengeance. You know, I never thought I would feel sympathy for the FBI, really. I have so much I can say about the FBI and the bad things they have done. I can say the same thing about police. I can say the same thing about so many agencies, so many representatives of government or enforcement. Doesn't mean I want them all gone. Doesn't mean I want them to just be wiped off the face of the earth and let's just see how things go. I think we know how it's going to go. And what we're basically doing now is having toddlers running the asylum and it's not going to turn out well unless we start doing something. Alex. Yeah, I want to respond to this comment about, well, what's happening, this is democracy, this is just what we voted for, and now we have to deal with it. I want to push back against that as well. I don't think that's true at all, I think that democracy involves legislation, democracy requires due process, democracy is about our traditional notions of having an opportunity to be heard before our property rights or entitlements are entirely canceled, billy-nilly. Democracy, as I mentioned, is about people coming together to pass laws that promote the good of this country and the good of the people and one of those laws that's been on the books for quite some time is something called the Hatch Act. And the Hatch Act, as somebody who worked for the federal government in both intelligence and defense capacities, the Hatch Act was extraordinarily important and especially within CIA was something that was very, very much respected. And the Hatch Act is a law that Congress passed that basically says the federal workforce has to be free from partisan political influence or coercion. That's what the Hatch Act says. It ensures that government programs are administered in some form of nonpartisan fashion. It protects federal employees from political coercion and prevents you from political proselytizing while within the workforce as well. So this whole notion that, well, that's just politics. That's what we voted for. That's just democracy, I think, is complete nonsense. we have laws to prevent that sort of quote-unquote democracy from infecting the federal government. I think it's really a sad state of affairs when we just are willing to accept the slash-and-burn mentality when it comes to federal programs and agencies and people's livelihoods that have been in place for decades, have done extraordinarily well, and are some of, I think, the more notable achievements in this country's history with respect to human rights and foreign aid and the soft power that the United States has wielded over some time. Now, I think there is a place for politics in the federal workforce as well, and there are many, many people that are political appointees of the president, and some of these I think are crazy like, you know, political appointees becoming general counsels of intelligence agencies and things like that, but those people are the political operatives that the president picks and chooses and they have to be confirmed by the Senate. So there's a place for politics and there's a place where it should not be, and I think we have to remember and I think respect the fact that the federal workforce is supposed to be free from this type of partisan nonsense. I'd like to go into some of the technical details a little bit more from a newsletter called Letters from an American by Heather Cox Richardson, I believe is the author's name here, who says that shortly after one in the morning yesterday, Vittoria Elliott, Dhruv Maratra, Leah Fager, and Tim Marchman of Wired reported that according to three of their sources, a 25-year-old engineer named Marco Elez, who previously worked for two Elon Musk companies, SpaceX and X or Twitter, now has direct access to Treasury Department systems responsible for nearly all payments made by the U.S. government. According to the reporters, Elez apparently has the privileges to write code on the programs at the Bureau of Fiscal Service that control more than 20% of the U.S. economy, including government payments of veterans' benefits, social security benefits, and veterans' pay. How everybody in this country is not extremely concerned over this is beyond me. The admin privileges he has typically permit a user to log into servers through Secure Shell access, navigate the entire file system, change user permissions, and delete or modify critical files. That could allow someone to bypass the security measures of and potentially cause irreversible changes to the very systems they have access to. If you would have asked me a week ago if an outsider could have been given access to a government server, one federal IT worker told the Wired reporters, I'd have told you that this kind of thing would never in a million years happen. But now, who the F knows, the reporters note that control of the Bureau of Fiscal Service Computers could enable someone to cut off monies to specific agencies or even individuals. Will Doge cut funding to programs approved by Congress that Donald Trump decides he doesn't like, asks Senator Chuck Schumer. What about cancer research, food banks, school lunches, veterans aides, literacy programs, small business loans? Josh Marshall of Talking Points Memo reported that his sources said that Elez and possibly others got full admin access to the Treasury computers on Friday, the 31st of January, and that he or they have already made extensive changes to the code base for the payment system. They are leaning on existing staff in the agency for help, which those workers have provided reluctantly in hopes of keeping the entire system from crashing. Marshall reports those staffers are freaking out. The system is due to undergo a migration to another system this weekend. How the changes will interact with that long-planned migration is unclear. The changes, Marshall's sources tell him, all seem to relate to creating new paths to block payments and possibly leave less visibility into what has been blocked. Less visibility. Those of you saying that this is democracy, let's swirl that one around a little bit. Now, both Wired and the New York Times reported yesterday that Elon Musk's team intends to cut government workers and to use artificial intelligence or AI to make budget cuts and to find waste and abuse in the federal government. Today, Jason Kobler, Joseph Cox and Emmanuel Mayberg of 404 Media reported that they had obtained the audio of a meeting held Monday by Thomas Shedd for government technology workers. Shedd is a former Musk employee at Tesla, who is now leading the General Services Administration's Technology Transformation Services, known as TTS, the team that is recoding the government programs. At the meeting, Shedd told government workers that things are going to get intense as his team creates AI coding agents to write software that would, for example, change the way logging into the government systems works. Currently, that software cannot access any information about individuals. As the reporters note, login.gov currently assures users that it does not affect or have any information related to the specific agency you are trying to access. But Shedd said they were working through how to change that login to further identify individuals and detect and prevent fraud. When a government employee pointed out that the Privacy Act of 1974 makes it illegal for agencies to share personal information without consent, Shedd appeared unfazed by the idea that they were trying something illegal. He said the idea would be that folks would give consent to help with the login flow, but again, that's an example of something that we have a vision that needs to be worked on and needs clarified. And if we hit a roadblock, then we hit a roadblock, but we still should push forward and see what we can do. Laws be damned. And that's where we are. Thoughts? Rob? Yeah. There is no element of democracy in a private citizen, in this case, Apartheid Clyde, marching in, creating an organization that is not a department of the United States government that would require approval by Congress. That's just sort of there. Get in a bunch of his friends to also be just sort of there. Nobody's wondering not only what these people's motivations are, but, you know, what are their situations regarding things like clearance and all these sorts of background checks that any of us would have to pass in order to be a high-level government employee. This is terrifying. This is terrifying. This is people who do not have the mandate of a democratic election to wield the power that they are claiming and getting pretty much unopposed at the moment. I was thinking of something else, which is, I mean, there are so many pieces of it, but one of them is when you take a theory that has been floated by the current president and decide that that's the thing you're going to run with. I'm sure you guys have heard the thing about condoms in Gaza and how they're going to cut condoms to Gaza because that is like a sign of government waste, government overreach. And apparently they're conflating several programs, including one helping an AIDS foundation in Gaza, Mozambique, because there are other places called Gaza. Wow. I didn't know that was, I knew they had it wrong. I didn't know they had it that wrong. Oh, they had it extremely wrong. And someone from USAID was like, we spent five cents per condom. Gaza does not need a billion condoms right now. Like, if you take something and assume it's wrong. However, I did read something, a theory that's going around, which is as distasteful as I find it conceptually. If we people, generally speaking, begin referring to apartheid Clyde as President Musk, that's going to get under the president's skin and he will cut ties. Well, you know, people have been trying that for a while now. They've been saying President Trump, I mean, President Musk for a while now. And it doesn't seem to be getting to him yet. We don't know what's going on behind the scenes. But I think even without that attempt, eventually the attention is all it will take to foster up some hostility between the two. But, you know, we can't really rely on that. We also have to, you know, fight back ourselves as individuals, as people who care about privacy. Yeah, if people contact their representatives and senators, if Congress disapproves of this kind of activity, my next kind of logical question is when will these actors, these agents be arrested or detained or investigated or all the above? And how will those, the powers of Congress enforce that compared to the sorts of protections they're being given in this sort of unofficial capacity? And I think the logic behind the relationship as it stands now is that technically Trump needs these actors because he himself really does not have the cadres of individuals that are even interested in this kind of stuff. he just has deputized these people as fit to do his bidding in this capacity, whether it is legal or not. And he's giving, he's sort of giving them some perceived cover, whether he actually has that or not, or has tested that or not. And I think it's really incumbent on us to activate those that represent us, no matter where you sit in this. If you're a veteran, if you're in a red or a blue part of the country, I think the details in this and the scope will profoundly affect whatever life and a community you're a part of, because the fall on effects for those that are losing their jobs or that are going to be victimized by this or not be able to run their organization, they're in your community. They are your neighbors. And if you think that there's, you know, too much of one thing or not enough of another, you're probably going to be surprised by how much more or how much worse any of your particular pet issues is. And that is the real bottom line to all of this. That, yeah, you may see one thing and think this is the answer, but I believe that if you really look into it and understand why we have protections for some of these things, and when it, especially when it comes to the, basically all of us. I mean, that's what these systems are responsible for. And you think that somehow this is going to improve government by doing it in unorthodox ways and without oversight and the kinds of processes that have been developed through law. I think you don't really, in a serious way, believe government has a function or a purpose at all. Quite possibly. And that may be your opinion, but you, again, you haven't really lived much of a life without one. So buckle up. You know, this is going to be a rude awakening if we don't activate and be incredibly vocal. Talk to your neighbors. Talk to people you might disagree with about, you know, all kinds, all manner of issues. But I would be willing to wager that most of us give a damn about how our personal identifiable information and how our payments and various services that we access, how that all works. Whether you benefit directly, it's in your backyard, and it will come home to roost if we do not get action from Congress. Our email address here at OffTheHook is OTH at 2600.com. We'd love to hear your thoughts and feelings. Also, we're on social media in various places, on Blue Sky and Macedon and Twitter. You can find us on, just by asking around, I guess, OffTheHook. But here's a couple of bits of feedback that we got in recent weeks. Tonight's episode, we were talking about some of the threats that hadn't yet happened. Tonight's episode was fantastic, so good to hear this conversation and know it went out over the air. This might be the most important time ever for OffTheHook. Grateful for you all. Thank you very much for that sentiment. Here's another. I'm glad the listener wrote in challenging OffTheHook to go an episode without talking about politics, only because it gave you guys an opportunity to give the best response possible to such a ridiculous request. It's good to see people get it. You know, these things are relevant, they're important, and avoiding them, that's how we get into these messes. All right? This is relevant to every single one of you. It's not just for the people that are billionaires, not just for the people who get elected, not just for the people who follow politics all the time. This affects our lives. And when you see clowns going around like they've done over the last week without any kind regard for our privacy, our security, or our future, you have to speak up. You have to take an interest. You have to have conversations. And maybe stick a bumper sticker or two up, or even graffiti. You know what? I don't care. Express yourself one way or another. It's more important than you could possibly know. We are out of time for the radio, but you know what? We're going to be on overtime. And you can get to overtime by going to youtube.com and entering channel 2600, all one word. We will be starting at 8. We'll be taking phone calls. And, of course, we will be back here on WBAI next Wednesday at 7. Please, please support WBAI because you know, no place else will you find a place that such ideas are able to be passed back and forth where free debate exists. Go ahead, Rob. Also, now it's more important, I think, than it has been in a long time to get out there and communicate with people about everything that's going on. And one place you can do that is at a 2600 meeting. Check them out all over the world this Friday, 2600.com slash meetings. Remember, you're not alone. There are all kinds of struggles and fights going on and people that need our help. And let's not do what this song says. Good night. If the nation's in progress is ours once or more, now that we have the new Teron bomb, it's nice and quick and clean and justice done. Away with the sense of the maybe, but no less value to The sense in war and perfect sense at home The sun's been found on a brand new day No more will be taxed to pay If something's done, I feel fair to delight The brothers' millions whisk away Unless we have more room to play All systems go and kill the fool at the night Kill, kill, kill, kill, kill the fool Kill, kill, kill, kill, kill the fool Kill, kill, kill, kill, kill the fool at the night It's a spark of light champagne You kind of start to play again A light's a breeze if you miss it and white Take under on the screen today And it's so residence today So let's get wasted and swear in it Kill, kill, kill, kill, kill the fool Kill, kill, kill, kill the fool Kill, kill, kill, kill, kill the fool at the night Kill, kill, kill, kill, kill the fool Kill, kill, kill, kill the fools Kill, kill, kill, kill, kill the fools And I fight Kill, kill, kill, kill, kill, kill the fools Kill, kill, kill, kill, kill the fools Oh, oh, oh We'll be right back. And welcome everybody to Overtime here on YouTube. I seem to be here in YouTube land. Kyle, you make it okay? Yes. It's weird here in YouTube land. Rob, is that you? Do I see you in the distance? That is in fact me. Okay, and you're on YouTube as well. Is that Gila? Gila, are you there? Okay, welcome. Welcome to YouTube. And Alex didn't make it, did he? Oh, that's too bad. What happened to him? Oh, there he is. Okay, I thought something bad happened to you. It happens sometimes. Oh, no, here I am. And my mic's on, which is, you know. That is a February miracle. That's for sure. And can we confirm that we are, in fact, actually broadcasting on YouTube as well? We can, in fact, confirm that. Welcome to the 34 people who are streaming with us. As I say that right now. Also, for what it's worth, when the stream began, it was as you were talking to us. So that was, if we looked a little dazed for a second, it was because you were here and you were here and there was a lot happening all at once. Wait, are you saying I started talking mid-sentence? No, they were. So. What? They're monitoring both. Oh. So it's like you're getting a delay and you have the delay to get to the site and then you also have other delay and yeah, and they're also hearing us live. Okay. Yes. We found ourselves dealing with two Emanuals at once and we weren't prepared. Also, thank you for the translation, Kyle. Sorry, Gila. I often told that. No, I appreciate it. One of me is more than enough, so I'm sorry you had to deal with two of me. All right. Well, you know what? Our phone number 802-321-4225 in case people just want to jump right in and say what's on their mind. But boy, you know, this has been a difficult week. It really has been because, you know, you don't know what's going to happen from one moment to the next. It's kind of like, you know, it reminds me of the pandemic because, you know, when that first was beginning, it just seemed like things were constantly getting worse and we didn't know how bad they were going to get. We really didn't. And a lot of people seem to forget that now. They're able to look back with 20-20 hindsight and say, well, this is what we got wrong. Okay. But at the time, people didn't know that and people were panicking and people were dying. There's no question about that. But, you know, you'd wake up one day and the stock market would be down a thousand points. And not that I really care about that, but it just sort of indicated how unpredictable everything was. I kind of feel like that's where we are now. In fact, I also feel like this is just another disease. And, you know, I don't mean that to be nasty. I just mean that it's a sickness. Well, I guess I'm still being nasty, but it's this kind of blatant ignorance. There's no way I can say it without being nasty. I'm sorry. But this kind of thing that's going on, you know, it's, it's just, it's so regrettable. It's, it's so easy to avoid. And it's also so inevitable that we have to go through this, you know, to learn. And it sucks that we have to do that. But here we are. And how we act and how we treat each other, I think that becomes so important now. I just don't want anybody to feel like they're the only voice in the wilderness crying out against this. And, um, for those of you who, for some reason support this, all right, you know what, I, I would like to be proven wrong, but I don't think I will be. And, um, yeah, I don't really know if I'd like to be proven wrong because I would mean that this kind of thing is okay. I don't see how this ends well. I do see how there'll be new beginnings. I do see how we'll need to rebuild and, um, do things better. But, um, let's hold on to our values. Let's hold on to our, um, our, our love of democracy and, and, and, and conversation and diversity. Yeah, I'll say it. Something I've been thinking about is how, uh, we need to be forceful, not fearful at this time. Yeah, absolutely. Absolutely. Alex, uh, what are you typing there? It's very loud. Oh, I didn't realize that my mic wasn't muted. That's the problem with having it open there. Yeah. Well, okay. If the mic is, is on and you're typing or your mic is off and you're talking. So which is it? Yeah, that's right. I was just trying to add ambiance with a mechanical keyboard to the discussion. Alex, you are the ambiance. So don't, you don't have to add anything. That's true. Well, I, I, what I was doing was scouring through some, some other TLDs using the same script that I wrote. Did another gov site get registered while we were talking? No, no, not, not that, not that I've seen it. Oh, I won't be able to check for new things until tomorrow. Why not? When all my data is updated. Why can't you check right now? Well, because I, I need, I need updated zone files in order to figure out what's in the .gov zone. And, um, and I won't get those until tomorrow. I mean, I guess I could, I could technically download the new zone files, but I don't think they will have been updated until tomorrow morning. Okay. All right. So there's a little bit, a little bit of a lag, but I was, was looking through other TLDs and figuring out just specifically what was new and, you know, how active these things were, but yeah, this, this find today was, was really quite interesting. Oh yeah. Uh, this whole last week or two, uh, has been, has been quite interesting. Uh, it's, it's too bad we didn't get to do a show last week. And, uh, you know, quickly, the reason we weren't able to do that, we did have, um, um, a software issue that we, um, we, we, we didn't find until it was too late to, to resume what we were trying to do. Um, we, we were, we, we, we took extra steps to ensure that the sound sounded good, but in so doing somehow something got reverted. That was kind of undetectable. Did you want to say more about that Kyle? Yeah. Part of it is like just sort of unexplainable at this point. I had been, um, playing around, which is always, uh, always, uh, uh, an indicator that things might go wrong, but I was, I was testing out some software, uh, known as ice cast because I was interested in alternatives or at least backups to some of the streaming that we're already doing now with a service provider like YouTube. So in doing that, like playing with a client, this was like mid December. So, um, because the bandwidth issue or something was slowing down a bit last week, we rebooted a couple of times and ended up that our, um, our connection to the studio, one of some of the parameters had been changed to, um, that particular service and, uh, a different, um, codec that we don't use. It didn't get changed by us though. That's the thing to emphasize. I can't explain it. It was changed by the program itself, but we had, we didn't expect that so that we weren't looking for it. Yeah. I wasn't looking at those settings. Um, and we, we, you know, we have a couple backups and things that we normally go through in this situation. And, um, and it really, it really is that we were troubleshooting this one thing and, and weren't looking there. It took too long to switch to, um, uh, other of our guests or other systems at the station that we could have used. And they were really trying back at, uh, WBAI big shout out to everybody there on the engineering side, uh, doing their absolute best to, to make things work. But it really ended up being sort of an unexplainable thing after we rebooted. And, and I think we were doing that just to make sure everything was working, but, uh, we figured it out and it won't happen again. I promise that won't happen again. Something else will, but not that. So that's, that's, check that one off the, off the list. I was the pilot and yeah, it's my fault. So a lot of our listeners, especially our active chatters, um, have been offering very helpful suggestions about last week and in general with other issues we've been having. Um, I'm going to make a statement. I would like it if you guys could help me on that. Um, the systems we're using to connect to the station are not ours to select, correct? Um, that's correct. There's a broadcast equipment and we're using, um, some of the best software that we have. It was misconfigured. That was the problem. Uh, when it's set right, it works fantastic. Absolutely. So we do appreciate the feedback we're getting from a lot of our listeners, but do need to remind you, especially the folks who don't live in WBAI broadcast range that we are not exclusively a podcast. And because we do broadcast on terrestrial radio immediately before this, some of the setup that we have is tied in directly to what works for the station and is not exclusively. We love you guys, but this event is not exclusively about the overtime broadcast. It was, it was, uh, overtime that I was thinking of, but you're absolutely right. You can't have overtime without off the hook. Just to make that clear, you know, if, if you had, if the Rangers played the Islanders, right. And you just had overtime, you didn't have the game. Don't you think the fans would be kind of pissed off? Of course they would be. That's not how it works. Overtime follows regular time. And that's, we don't call the show regular time. We call it off the hook, but that's not the issue. The issue is we do that show. And then afterwards, as we're sitting back and relaxing and hanging out with our friends who I believe everybody on this, on this particular, uh, uh, forum is, uh, we, we, uh, you know, do overtime and then, uh, we do super overtime after that, but we're not going to talk about that. Yes. Uh, Rob, go ahead. Yes. Just, you know, well, well put. And, uh, to put it another way, if you don't off the hook, you can't have any overtime. How can you have any overtime if you don't off the hook? All right. Now we're going to have to deal with Roger Waters on that. So, uh, yeah. Um, all right. So, um, we have a phone call who's been waiting a very long time. They're very patient. They may not have remained there. Let's find out how patient they are. Good evening. You're on off the hook overtime. Go ahead. Are you still there? Yeah. I don't think they're very patient. I don't think they, they hung around. All right. Well then our phone number once again is eight zero two three two one four two two five. And, um, if somebody calls in, we'll, uh, we'll, we'll, we'll put you on. Um, yes. So I had, excuse me, a thought. I would also like to point out that, um, Trader Joe's now has a Caesar salad dip and it's amazing. So jump on that if you can. What the hell does that have to do with anything else? I've been noshing on it and it's delicious, but that was why I had to clear my throat. Okay. So I did want to share a piece of wisdom from my faith tradition that I think speaks to this particular moment. Go ahead. He used to say it is not your duty to finish the work, but neither are you at liberty to neglect it. We know that each one of us individually is not going to be able to do everything that needs to be done right now, but it is incumbent upon you to do what you can. You need to make sure that you are participating in the fight, whatever your role in that is, you can't do nothing. You can't do it all alone, but you can't do nothing. And I think that really, I mean, I try to keep that in mind all the time, but I think it really speaks beautifully to a lot of what we've been talking about tonight and in general. Well said. And I, you know, I think a lot of people might not realize how easy it is not to do nothing, how low a bar that is to do something. The smallest, the smallest effort matters. It can reach somebody, talking to somebody, you know, listening to somebody, reading something and sharing something, you know, just, just participating in some way that is not nothing. All right. And we all have the ability to do that. I know it's, it's a lot. I know it's, it's easy to feel completely overwhelmed and that there's no hope and that we're all just, you know, hurtling to our doom one way or another. But we're together and we have each other and we have our voices and we should use them, you know, because we're in a unique place. I like to say that, you know, that sure it sucks and it's crazy and we deserve better, but boy, this is an interesting time, isn't it? And, uh, they're going to write all kinds of history books and maybe what you say will matter in the years ahead. Who knows, but you're in a unique place and you're with friends. So let's try to remember that. All right. We have a phone call. Good evening. You're on off the cover time. Go ahead. Hello. I am the first caller. You're the first caller. Could you speak up first caller? Uh, is this better? I'm putting my hand to direct my voice into the microphone. That is better. Yes. Where are you calling from? I am Lou Raichu. I am calling from Washington, DC, which is practically Donald Trump's backyard, which makes everything that was on off the hook a bit more scarier. Yes. So that's me there. Wow. What's on your mind? I mean, I mean, I think I've been listening to the show for a while now. We do the magazine, all that. Yeah. One of the things that, uh, my friend said was that, you know, after the, after the orange guy, you know, after his, after his four years, everything's going to be so screwed up, he's just to say, well, I'm going to declare martial law. And, you know, this is how it is. I stay in power. So I'm just thinking about what happened to the Philippines, other places where the, they declare martial law. Yeah. Interesting. Even with the Philippines, you know, a place that lived through the, the hell of Ferdinand Marcos. And then what do they do? They elect Ferdinand Marcos Jr. to take over the country. And, you know, it seems kind of like a parallel, you know, we are not the only country that supposedly loses its mind occasionally and does something that clearly is not in our best interest, but maybe somehow that moves us forward. I don't know how, but maybe somehow that's what winds up happening. Oh, I hope. I mean, there's going to be a lot of stuff to clean up after this guy. Well, we'll see. I don't know. I mean, the other thing I wanted to say, since I got here before Rebel, I've been hearing him. Good job, by the way. No, good job on that. Thank you. Yeah. Well, hopefully this won't distract him too much, but he's been going on about using the Lynx browser on his, uh, on one PC. Now I like to use another text-based browser called W3M. It's in the, uh, package repository of most distros. Okay. So, um, yeah, I just grabbed that, but what's special about, uh, W3M is that it can display images in your terminal. I usually use it in, uh, framebuffer mode. So you do control out and then one of the F keys. I think on most systems, uh, the desktop, the X server starts on, uh, framebuffer, the FB6. So to get to that, you do control out F6, but, uh, you just do control out one of the function keys and you get to a framebuffer terminal where you can log in and do that. Once you're in the framebuffer terminal, you can just type W3M, uh, make sure you got the W3M dash IMG package to display images. Whenever you go to a site, it will display the images for the site. So that's pretty neat. That is neat. Wow. W3M. Oh dear. Well, that's an interesting way to, uh, end the conversation, but, uh, mic drop. I'm sorry. Go ahead. That's a mic drop. I guess it is. No, busy signal for those that don't know what that sound is. That's a bit. Well, it wasn't a busy signal in this case. It was end of call, I guess. Yes. So I did want to remind everybody that the caller who we were just on with has been hanging in hard with us since the beginning of overtime. And do you all remember about 14, 15 months ago, a listener remixed us saying the words gay furry hackers. Yes, I do remember that. That was the caller. Wow. I don't remember, I don't remember saying that, but I do remember somebody remixing that. That was why when we heard the name, you saw like me freak out because I was just so excited. I thought you were choking on the Trader Joe salad. That's what I thought was happening. It's dip. It's Caesar salad dip. And I have to tell you, it's really, really good. No, no spawn con, except to, except to say that if you want to go out on SoundCloud and look up Blue Raichu and the gay furry hackers track, it's still there and it's still up and it still slaps, you know, as long as we're promoting things, can I promote the hope conference? Because this is something that's happening this year and it's going to be super important. It already is. For the first time ever, we're doing hope conferences in consecutive years. That's never happened before. At first it was every three years and it was every two years. And now, you know, if it's every one year, so be it, you know, we'll work a little harder, but we'll, we'll have a lot more to say. And I think it'll, it'll, it'll keep growing and become more and more important, but for it to work, we need people obviously to buy tickets. We need people to submit talks. We need people to submit workshop ideas. Please join the people who are doing that already. As we're not very good at promoting ourselves, we need all the help we can get as far as getting the word out. All the info right now is at hope.net. We're, we're very, very close to getting the dormitories open. I just was checking that out last night, in fact, and it's an incredible deal. You'd stay on campus. And basically it's like a, you know, it's like going away camping for, for a few days on campus, except you're in the middle of hope. It's really an awesome way to do it. Uh, and of course we'll have hotel deals too, in, in, in the area as well. Uh, but mostly we just want to hear, uh, what, what people are up to. We want to see creative ideas, uh, technology used in all sorts of different ways. Um, you can be coming from any, any walk of life, any, um, uh, philosophy. Um, we want to hear from you and we want to see people participate. And, uh, it's a hackers on planet earth conference for the first time in an odd year. Well, second time in an odd year, because 1997, uh, was our second conference. But ever since then, it's been only even years. And, um, this time it's going to be every year that's assuming that's assuming that, um, people show up that we get, um, uh, you know, enough people to make this something we're willing to pour our hearts and souls into. And you know what? We also need volunteers to help us do this. Volunteering is a lot of fun and it's something where you learn all kinds of things. You meet all sorts of people and you really build a community. It's, it's one of the most incredible things. So all the info is at hope.net and, um, we really hope to see you there and we hope to, uh, build an incredible conference and let's make this a yearly thing. You know, we talked about doubling down when this whole thing got started, when, um, um, we realized what we were in for for the next four years. Uh, well, okay. You know, we'll double down. We'll work harder. We'll, um, uh, do more of what we do. And if that turns out to be a good idea, if that's something that people support, then we're gaining something from what could be negativity. So it's one way we can, we can build a better world, I think. So, uh, hope.net another thing, another thing I'd like to ask people for their support, um, write articles for 2600. You know, we, we, we just put out the issue, uh, a couple of weeks ago. If you notice the cover, you guys see the cover. Uh, yeah. Elon Musk is on the cover never before, never before has a cover come out, uh, in such a timely manner because, you know, he was in the news when we, uh, put the cover together, which was about two months ago. Um, but now he's really in the news and, um, yeah, there he is on, on newsstands all around the world now. And he's not happy about that. Um, so if, um, yeah, if you want to make him, uh, uh, less happy, uh, well, um, I guess leave it on the newsstand so more people will see it, but now buy the issue, bring the issue home, frame it. Oh, we also have shirts. We have shirts with his face on it too. So there's all kinds of ways that you can annoy him. Uh, but most importantly, uh, supporting the magazine is what makes all this possible. And, um, and please write an article for us. If you are into any kind of technology, uh, or have ideas, thoughts, you know, uh, uh, fun escapades stories from the past or the present right to us at, uh, 2600.com articles at 2600.com. Uh, we also need, uh, more payphone photos. They've fallen off in the last few weeks. I don't know why, you know, we, we, we, we have about maybe a third, but we usually have at this particular time. And I don't know if everybody's distracted. I do know there's less payphones, but, um, you know, they are still there and we certainly could use, um, more documentation of them. So, um, payphones at 2600.com is the email address for that. All the information is on 2600.com. Um, yeah, I think that's pretty much everything that I have to say about that. And of course, what Rob said at the end of the show, 2600 meetings taking place this Friday, all around the world, first Friday of the month, first Friday of February. So yeah, a lot's going on. A lot is happening. Let's, um, let's make it fun and, uh, let's, let's be there for each other. You can start your own meeting as well. Um, if you're in a place or a country that does not have a lot of meetings, we encourage you to set one up and let us know if people show up and you participate, uh, we'll be happy to add you to the next cycle of our, our, um, publications of the, of those dates and locations, except in Canada where meetings are illegal. Is that a challenge? Well, no, I, I'm saying that because I can't think of any other reason why since the pandemic, you know, since the heyday of the pandemic, at least it's, uh, they've, they've, uh, disappeared. No meetings have, have relaunched. I think we have one meeting relaunched, but it didn't last very long, but come on, you know, Montreal, Toronto, Ottawa, Vancouver, Winnipeg, there, there, there are so many places to have meetings that we have had meetings in the past and all kinds of other places in the United States, Europe, Asia have relaunched. Uh, so I don't understand what's going on in Canada. So if you're in Canada, uh, go to, uh, uh, the meeting part of our 2600 page 2600.com slash meetings, uh, and, uh, read the guidelines, start your own meeting, let us know, and we will publicize it. And let's, let's get hackers together in Canada again. Uh, unless there's a reason, unless maybe there is a law against, against hackers meeting on the first Friday of the month in a food court or something. Gila, did you have something? I did actually, we had a request to give out the number, which I realized we haven't done yet this evening. I mean, there's somebody on the, did we? I said the number several times. I'm pretty sure I did. Well, Kyle's going to say it now. 802-321-4225. I guess everybody will hear that, but they won't hear me. That's fine. That's no problem. We do have a call as well. And we have a call. Go ahead, Gila. No, no, no, no, no, no. I, sorry. I was just confused. Okay. We're all confused. Is that the call you were talking about, Kyle? It was a call. That's our other show calling us. That's what's happening there. That's our theme song. That's very exciting. Um, where can I get off the hook magazine? That's a great question. Wow. Where can you get off the hook magazine? That's what, what, what, what's wrong with us? Why aren't we doing that? Why aren't we, let's fire up the desktop publisher and put out another magazine. Someone in the chat has this question. Okay. So maybe they're asking where they can get 2600 magazine. It just came out wrong. Right. Is that, is that what you meant? Uh, uh, query person where they come from? Is this a letter? What is this? No, this is someone pop this in the chat. Oh, chatter. Okay. Um, go ahead. Yes. So until, and unless we start, um, our own off the hook zine, which I volunteered to copy on our brother machine over here, um, a 2600 magazine can be found in bookstores and newsstands around the world, right? It's every Barnes and Noble, um, pretty much every book chain in the continental United States and Canada that still exists a little harder to find overseas, but you can get it easily on our store store.2600.com. You can get printed copies. You can get a digital copy. You can have a digital copy tonight. Yeah. It's, it's, it's easy back issues, all sorts of things. So, um, it's, it's, it's really simple to get. Yeah. The name of the magazine is 2600, the hacker quarterly. Yes. That is, uh, the official name and people could be forgiven. If you're just listening to off the hook or off the hook over time, we don't actually talk about the publication in the same, uh, venue, but it is certainly, um, another of our outlets for information from hackers written by hackers, uh, uh, compiled and, and edited by hackers and, um, put forth out into the world to spread the word about what the modern hacker and what telecommunications networks are all about these days. We also talk about vintage systems, how the current system was built and, um, you know, sort of the roots of it with the base of that, the foundation that, uh, we've basically come to know and that has evolved into the many modes that we communicate now. So yeah, we haven't mentioned it as much on the show, but it is 2600, the hacker quarterly. You can find out everything and get links to everything at 2600.com to expand on, on what Kyle is saying. Uh, this is a magazine that was founded by hackers. It's written by hackers. It's, um, uh, distributed by hackers, read by hackers, discussed by hackers and filed away in libraries by hackers for all time because it lasts forever. You can read an issue of 2600 from 1987 and you'll find yourself reading the articles because they're still interesting or, or reading the letters, you know, or looking at the pictures. That's a, that's the magic of, of, of a magazine like this. So, um, it's, it's great. We're all bound together by this. Now we have another phone call. I think, is this our theme calling us again? Hopefully not. I don't know. I picked it up so quickly. I have no idea what's on the other. No idea. Okay. Well, let's see what, what, what's out there. Good evening. You're on off the hook over time. Go ahead. Oh, hi. I appreciate everything you've said so far. And I, they're saying, you might recall me. Well, I, I call, I've called a few times, but right after the election, I said, this is Germany, 1933 or 32, because it was, was before 33. And now you're just seeing how they're doing it. Okay. Nobody knew the, what the actual mechanical devices would be that they're, but they're definitely doing what Hitler did, a cool from the inside. But aside from that, you also mentioned the pandemic, and it looks like a new one is budding. This is just fresh off the press. A version of the H5N1 birth flu virus known as B3.13 was confirmed in March after being introduced to cattle in late 2023, scientists say. Now this one has been detected in dairy cows in the U S as you know, the fire, the virus, the previous birth, birth flu virus already jumped to humans. So, you know, and, and I'm not trying to propagate a conspiracy theory. We had a pandemic with the first Trump and because of his craven idiotic policies of isolationists, isolationism is the same thing is happening again. He didn't withdraw from the WHO with the first pandemic, but he let the candidate of China, the Ethiopian now in charge of the WHO being elected because he refused to back an interesting candidate who was an epidemiologist by the name of Navarro, but he spelled his, his name with a B instead of a V as the corrupt official who went to jail, uh, during, um, the congressional, uh, for, for congressional, uh, sorry, for contempt of Congress. Uh, and he worked in the first Trump administration. I think it was the commerce representative, but, uh, Dr. Navarro, uh, campaigned and was not elected. Davros, whatever his last name is, uh, the Ethiopian candidate is in, he was beholden to China. And again, I'm not, I'm not making a conspiracy. I'm just stating facts. We'll see what happens this time. Yeah. That's all we can do is see what happens. No, I know I'm all for continuing to talk, but we also have to mount a decisive response to what's going on. And, you know, I don't know what it could be, but talking alone is not enough. These people are organized. They came in for it with a plan and they're implementing the plan. Now you're absolutely right about that because that is something that, um, uh, people I agree with for the most part don't seem to get, you know, as far as turning out, being loud and obnoxious, I think in ways oftentimes we're too considerate, you know, the, the right wingers, this is one thing they get right. They, they know what they want. It's simple. They want their way, nothing else, but they keep demanding that. And enough of them agree what their way is that they get together. And, um, they can't be ignored. Whereas our side, we, we kind of, we want to hear from other people as well. And we want to know that we're being fair and we want to, uh, you know, not be intimidating. And I, you know, I get that for the most part, I get that. But sometimes when you're pushed into a corner, you have to react like what you're saying. You have to do more than just talk. You have to show up. You have to be loud. You have to be abrasive. You have to be offensive sometimes. And I think we're being pushed into that. And if we don't do that, we're, we're, we're just going to, um, uh, you know, forever be victims. It's time that, you know, in Germany, for instance, a quarter of a million people showed up to demonstrate against Elon Musk and what he's doing there with a far right Nazi party that he basically supports, you know, here he is in this country, taking over our private data and, and, and violating our privacy. And we're, we're doing barely anything. You know, we're getting Chuck Schumer peering over his glasses, telling folktales and, you know, it's, it's not enough. We need more than that. I totally agree. And, you know, one part of what you say is ingrained in quote, our side being the side of reason is we are the side of reason. We are reasonable by definition. So we are not the, the screamy, uh, outraged, uh, fascist who, who the other side seems to cherish at this point, but we do have to do something. And, you know, uh, we, we need to talk about that. Uh, talking is good, but we need to talk about taking action, showing, showing signs, showing signs of dissent, you know, that, that is important. You know, I, I can't tell you over the last, um, um, um, 10 or so years, the people who are opposed to what this country has been going through, they're very cautious about expressing that. Whereas the people who are in favor of, of, you know, more of the kinds of things that we wince at, they don't seem to be at all afraid to express themselves. You know, they wave their banners, they put up stickers everywhere. They, they basically say whatever is on their mind. And we just have to sort of grin and bear it and say, we're better than that, but not too loud because you say it too loud, it might, you know, evoke some kind of a conflict or confrontation. I think maybe those days need to be in the past where people start speaking a little louder and not being quiet. You know, I, I, I get, I get. Well, they are in the past. They are in the past. And as you rightly pointed out, once people see their social security payments being suspended or their veteran checks being suspended or their money supply being suspended simply because they're speaking up or they're not liked by the present administration, it may ring a bell, but it may be too late. Well, they have that kind of grip on our lives. We have, you know, we, we need, we need to not let it get to that, but it is getting to that very quickly. Well, I think, I think it's gotten to that. I think it's gotten to that. And the question is, um, you know, I don't think it's ever too late because even amongst the rubble, we can rebuild, but how much rebuilding do we want to have to do? Maybe we have to do a lot, but right now it's really, it's not the time to stay quiet anymore. It really isn't unless you really want to see it all fall apart. I totally agree. I'll, I'll let someone else speak as well. Thank you so much. Thank you for the good work. Thank you. Take care. And am I right? Why is my voice like, oh, because this is a, okay, sorry. Am I right? We have more listeners than I think we've ever had. I saw 84. We've never been above like 40. What's going on? Gila, what are you doing? I, I, I don't know what's happening. I'm thrilled. Everybody is here. We got 84 people with us right now. This is insane. Another 16 and I can see if this thing can hold three digits. That's correct. All right. So now we're up to 85. All right. 15 more people. And I can, I can, I can expand the, um, the screen here. I mean, y'all load up on guns, bring your friends. I'm just saying, um, wait, what? The team spirit. Oh, thanks. I don't know when I'm being quoted at. I'm sorry. We have another phone call. Yes. Okay. Uh, again, uh, should point out the phone number, which I'm going to give out yet again, eight zero two, three, two, one, four, two, two, five. If you call that number now, you will wind up in voicemail hell. Uh, and there's not much that you can do about that, unfortunately. Uh, but you have to wait till somebody stops talking and then there's, there's a single line and a lot of other lines that go to voicemail. That's just how it works. And I guess it's an opportunity now to call in because nobody's on the phone. 802. So I ripped it off the wall. I'm sorry. 802. Three, two, one, four, two, two, five is our phone number. I cut myself while I was shaving. All right. Enough of that. I can't make a call. Yeah. It's just a YouTube. I don't think you can even do that on YouTube without it. It couldn't get much worse here. Oh no. I think it's quite the opposite. It's getting much, much worse. Here we go again. Keela, every week. Watch out. Watch out. All right. Do you have a phone call? Yes. All right. And good evening. You're on off the hook overtime. Go ahead. There's nobody there, Kyle. See, that's a busy signal, even though it's not really indicating a busy line. That's just what you get now for some reason. I think we're up to 90 now. Well, you know, here's the thing. When you get more people involved, you get more jokesters involved and that's why you're getting off the hook tones and busy signals and things like that. Assume people will call and tone us. You know what that is when someone calls and leans on a touchstone? Yeah. It's, you know, part of the dark side of popularity. We can breeze through them. I mean, it's not even a thing. 87. Only 13 more and we get to 100. Actually, I've got us at 90 right now. Okay. How do we get more people to listen? Because we have to talk to them to get them to listen, which means they're listening if we can talk to them. All right. Last chance from this. Maybe some of the people who are listening now can call their friends and ask them to listen to get us to 100. Wouldn't that be nice? All right. We have a phone call. Good evening. You're on all the cover time. Go ahead. Hi. I'm your Toronto caller from a few months ago. Hey, Toronto. I have a call. Yes. Where they have no meetings. They still have no meetings in Toronto, right? Yeah. Well, I'm happy to try to start one. Oh, that would be amazing. I was part of an asterisk group. I was part of an asterisk group for about 10 years and then it just died. But yeah, happy to start. I'll look into it and see and communicate with you. But I have a couple of other questions. Go ahead. So we get some interesting news up here. And I'm wondering if anybody, does anybody know about the biology theory about digital cities? No, not expressly. Do you know who biology is? Okay. So biology is a very smart guy. B-A-L-A-J-I-I, I believe. He's an American, I guess, of Indian background. And he has like multiple PhDs, chemical engineering, mechanical engineering, Stanford, you know, smart guy. Started, one of the founders of Coinbase. He's left Coinbase about two years ago and he is in an undisclosed location someplace. Oh, dear. Some people suspect he's in Singapore, but we don't know. Okay. Anyway, he is, every time he gets interviewed, every time he's interviewed, the interview's at least an hour and a half long and it's just full of stuff. And somebody asked, Tim Ferriss asked him in an interview, he says, so what do you do in your spare time? He said, I read. So he has this concept of digital cities and they are not geographic cities. They are virtual cities and that this is what this is all about. Elon wants to create a digital, he wants to create digital cities. And that's the ultimate. That's what he wants. And does anybody know about the Mission to Mars book that was written by, who's the German that did the, I'm trying to think. I can't think of the name right now. Anyway, it was a German, one of the paperclip people, you know, that came from after the second war that the U.S. government let them in because they had so much great engineering experience. Okay. I'll think of his name in a minute here. So he wrote a book called Mission to Mars and the premise is that they're playing this Mission to Mars. And there's a lot of technical information, evidently, about the rockets and how to land and all this stuff. But they go on and they talk about that they actually made the Mission to Mars and when they get there, there's already a colony there. And it's living underground. And you can find this. This is available out there. And there's a colony already there. And they all live underground. And the dictator of the colony is the Elon. And Musk's father read the book. And that's where Elon gets his name. Interesting. You know, I saw a reference to that where Elon Musk himself apparently was finding out about this. And he seems surprised like he had never heard of it before. Well, what do you expect of somebody who attends the inauguration on ketamine? Did you see the video of him in the background? He's like tweaking on drugs. He's really affected. Well, he was sitting next to Trump's youngest son. And I think he was looking embarrassed. So yeah, I could I could imagine. So no, I mean, he admitted on an interview that he does ketamine once a week. Okay, well, you know, anyway, it's his life. Anyway, I'm just wondering if any that well, no, it is that if that's what you want, if that I use I started business many years ago in Chicago, where I shared an office space with a small company. And the company turned out to the owner turned out to every Friday night, he wanted to he and his general manager wanted to just cook their cook their brains up. And then he would do all kinds of things. And eventually, the business went bankrupt. The guy went bankrupt, everything happened. And all I could think of was that, well, when you own your own business, it gives you the right to do anything you want to, even if that means cooking it up your nose. And he did. So anyway, I just wonder if anybody had seen this theory and what was going on. And I'm looking at it as a guide to what we can expect, because I think all this stuff that Trump is doing, first of all, I don't think he's smart enough to know the stuff he's doing. This is all project 2025 stuff that's been in the works for a while. And that they have an ultimate goal about this. And I'm just, I'm trying to stay ahead of it. So I can stay above ground and alive. And that's smart. That's smart to stay ahead of it and know these things and see what's coming. Yeah, understanding people's philosophy and the things that are instructive to them is a way to is a window into their thinking and perhaps forecasting their actions can be, you know, derived from those, those insights. Yeah. And, and there are some, sad to say, pretty smart people behind this. I think they've already figured out plan B, plan C and plan D. So when people go to court and file suits and this and it's all, but I, it was amazing to watch on the news today that no number of people demonstrating around and every state capital around the United States. Well, it does not have to be one thing at a time. Yeah. That's true. Well, I can't say I was smart enough 20 years ago when I came to Canada, uh, to come here, but boy, am I glad I'm here. Yeah. Uh, you know, and, um, uh, Canada is just a breath of fresh air. You know, we've been watching a lot of Canadian TV over the past couple of weeks and it's just, it's an oasis. It really is. And please stay, stay who you are and don't, don't be affected by the craziness coming out of here. Yeah. So, uh, has anybody, does it, has anybody ever read Heinlein, a stranger in a strange land? Of course. Ah, okay. So there's the Elon story right there. He's Michael Smith. Oh, don't ruin that book, man. That's, that's such a good book. I hate to think. Oh Lord. Oh no. The Trump, the trouble is I think Elon thinks he's Michael Smith. Maybe, maybe. Yeah. Yeah. Well, I don't think Michael Smith was ever that nasty and mean. So, I mean, in the story anyway, I think he was benevolent and he, you know, meant well. And, but, and that's what I thought of Elon up till about a month before he started supporting Trump. Well, here's the thing, maybe this is it. Here's the thing, you know, um, I can't really identify with Elon Musk, but I, you know, I've known people who are kind of like him. Um, and obviously he had access to a lot of things. Obviously he was very enthusiastic and, you know, uh, pretty bright about many things. Um, when you inject unlimited power, unlimited money, it changes who you are. And unfortunately that is what has happened to him. He doesn't see it. His followers don't see it, but it's, it's a tragic story. It will be a tragic story. Mark my words. Uh, because when you have access to so much, um, I mean, look at what happened to Michael Jackson, you know, somebody who just had his own world around him completely lose a sight and look at any, any dictator, look at Kim Jong-un, look at Chesescu, look, look at, you know, even Lukashenko, all kinds of people that are just blinded to what's going on in the actual world. And they don't see it coming when reality catches up to them. And it's a damn shame because this guy, he has a lot to offer, you know, a lot of his technology, it really, you know, it's, it's doing cool things, but the price, the price now is just, it's, it's just way too high. It's, it's so negative now. So did you see that Amazon closing down all their operations in province, Quebec? I did hear about that. They're claiming that. Well, they're claiming that it has nothing has to do with the union, union trying to form, but I think that's it, but well, and I heard the Bezos that I don't know when it was with us today or recently said he wants every Amazon employee to wake up every morning and be terrified that they might be fired that day and replaced by a robot. What a nice guy. Yeah. You see, it's just when you have such wealth in your hands, such power, it's so rare that you stay a good person. It really is. Anyway, listen, thank you for your call. I'm sorry, go ahead. The people that make it possible to be there, no, just the people that make it possible for him that do what he does and be there is the ones he's essentially taking a shit on. So thank you for taking my call and listening to me your hand a little bit. And I hope, I hope we hear about a meeting coming out of Toronto soon. Well, I'll go look it up and see what I can do about it. All right. Appreciate it. Please come back. Thanks guys. All right. Take care. On the subject of Project 2025, remember we were talking about Project 2025 last year, Republicans were saying, oh, this, you know, that's just a bunch of people just independently coming up with ideas, got nothing to do with the Trump campaign. You know what? They might not have been telling the truth. Some of the Office of Personnel Management, OPM memos that have been sent to federal workers about firing and hiring freezes and mandatory return to office demands. Well, according to 404 Media, they were seemingly written by people who were previously employed by the Heritage Foundation and other conservative think tanks with longstanding loyalties to President Donald Trump. That's according to metadata on the memos posted by the government online. We know this because the senders of the memos failed to scrub the metadata from those documents, making it easy for anyone to reveal the listed authors of the memos. The 2025 Presidential Transition Project, better known as Project 2025, is a right-wing agenda from the Heritage Foundation that lays out the blueprint for remaking the federal government by firing government workers to install conservative right-wing figures. The priorities of its authors include restricting access to reproductive care, mass deportations, and firing civil servants to replace them with Trump loyalists. Memos to federal chief human capital officers, HR directors, and heads of agencies are available publicly on the CHCO website. The memo author metadata was spotted by someone on Reddit's r slash Fed News community in response to a federal workers post. So, yeah, that's from 404 Media. Very definite link. So, in case you thought it was an exaggeration, it wasn't. And probably the next warning won't be as well. Shout out to 404 Media, and I think the people that wrote the Wired article, those investigators, and a lot of other independent self-publishing investigative journalists that are talking to people, getting witnesses, getting information, getting sources together. It's helping it make it to other outlets at a much higher frequency than normal, and it's really crucial to have that and have those outlets continuing to do that work, however big or small. And to those people who continue to criticize us for revealing information or just questioning things, I mean, it's... When you realize who is actually calling the shots here and who is questioning them, these are journalists, okay? Wired, 404 Media, all the others, they are journalists uncovering things. If you're criticizing them, you're not questioning. If you think they're part of some massive conspiracy, but the billionaires aren't, yeah, you're fooling yourselves. I mean, there's no nice way to say that. Journalism is so important, and when journalism is the enemy, you're probably on the wrong side. Also, Ars Technica and The Register, stay salty out there. Yeah, there's so many, so many. You need to support as much in the way of independent journalism as possible. And you also see how they can get corrupted by those very same people, those very same billionaires. When they buy newspapers, when they buy media organizations, they can corrupt them. They can make them do their bidding. Remember when the Washington Post wasn't allowed to endorse Kamala Harris? They had it written up, but Jeff Bezos said no. And now that's the same Jeff Bezos threatening his workers, showing up on Inauguration Day, bending the knee, kissing the ass. Yeah. Are we surprised? Are we having a phone call? All right. 802-321-4225. I believe this is a regular. A regular caller? Yes. Good evening. You're on all phone call with time. Who are you? Eleanor Elizabeth Borman, a regular caller. Oh, hi. How are you doing? Surviving. I've been better. I was just calling in to say Elon Musk is one of quite a number of transhumanist billionaires. Oh, he's not going to like the word, the trans part of that. I know that. Oh, well, he's a transhumanist. He wants humans to merge with AI, achieve a symbiosis with artificial intelligence. And his company, Neuralink, aims to facilitate this. Yeah, it almost sounds like it's going to be mandatory. There's a lot of transhumanist billionaires who want human beings to separate themselves from their bodies. Well, you know, I think there's probably a lot of people that would want him to do that first and see how it goes and then get back to us. Yeah, there are people who want to freeze themselves just before death so they can be cured in the future. Lots of luck with that. Yeah, I think they need to work on the present before they think about the future and maybe try to cure themselves now. Anything else on your mind? But you were just saying what you thought about Elon Musk thinking, and so I just wanted to let you know that. That's a good reminder. That is also an aspect of this. And there's a company for that, apparently. And it has a lot to do with brain-computer interfaces, which has been something that has been speculated about, theorized about, written about for a very long time. Unfortunately, when you have a sort of consolidation or you have people first to market with something and then they patent and make it impossible for there to be any sort of competition and then their benevolence ends up being mandatory as e-insinuated, you create an environment where people do not have agency in how they use these technologies. Even if they voluntarily sign up, there may be mechanisms and things that are designed to sort of bypass free will without you even knowing. So I think that level of discussion is not something they want to be upfront about. They want to demonstrate it and create a product, but I don't know that they want to open up how this will be implemented. And you could be talking about a service like Amazon in the same breath. So, I mean, there's a lot about the implications that discourse and the public comments have to do the heavy lifting on. If you could upload your pseudo-personality into a computer and pretend that that's really you, if you upload everyone into computers, who's going to be taking care of the computers and the electricity and everything else? Exactly the questions, the types of questions. And if it's that younger generations or people that are not yet doing that, transitioning, shall we say, and they're learning from embodiments of past humans, how can you guarantee or what sort of error checking would even be possible to make sure they're learning from the approximations of those humans in an accurate way? And then what type of society does it become? Do you then have those generations failing to meet their own basic needs as a result of what they're taught by the machines that are left? You know, if this were a Black Mirror episode, we would just now be discovering that Elon Musk has already done this and that he is AI, you know? And I would explain an awful lot and make it a lot easier to just, you know, unplug it. Has anyone seen his personal assistant? Oh, gosh, I feel sorry for whoever that is or whatever that is. Any other thoughts, caller? No, that's what I caught up to say. All right, well, hang in there. And we'll see you down the road. Okay. Thank you. All right, we're almost out of time, but let's see if we can get one or two more phone calls in. We have so many listeners now. 802-321-4225. It's weird, I can make my voice do all kinds of things just by moving that knob around. It's returning the audio so that the callers can hear us. Oh, that's why, okay. It's also going out to our guests so they can monitor the phone calls themselves since they're not here. But to me, I sound more muffled like this, but if I do this, I sound crisper, but then I also sound a little distorted. Well, I believe you're bringing the fader past Unity on our mixer, which adds dB to the output, but I'm not exactly... I love when you talk AV. It's just so amazing. I'm not exactly an audio engineer. I'm self-taught, and I have a lot to learn, and there are much better audio engineers. Well, there's an audio engineer calling in to correct your words. I'm sure there is. And good evening. You're on Off The Govertime. Go ahead. Yo, what's up? How you doing? Where are you calling from? I'm calling from Newark. Newark, New Jersey, or Newark, Delaware? New York, New Jersey. Okay. All right. That's the original one. How you doing today, Golsan? I'm doing all right. I'm doing all right. How are you? All this well, my brother. All this well. We're doing a little project with my dad. We're building a little bi-pole, and it came out pretty nice. Cool. I just came to talk... I just want your take on, like, apparently Elon Musk's takeovers causing rifts in the president's inner circle. What's your take on that? Well, we were talking about that before. It's inevitable that, you know, Trump does not like when anybody takes the spotlight from him. And Elon Musk certainly is taking the spotlight from anybody. So I imagine he's already a bit miffed at this. Hasn't quite made its way into the public yet, but I give it maybe another week or two before some indication of that happens. Question is, how does Elon Musk react to that? Does he just, you know, bow down to Trump, or does he somehow stand up to him? And that's going to be interesting either way. All right. Thank you so much, brother. I owe you a Pepsi. Okay. Fair enough. Take care. Well, I think past evidence has indicated he tends to have a tenacity, a sort of relentlessness. Which one? Elon Musk. Okay. About these kinds of projects. Why do villains always have single syllable last names? I don't know. I mean, think about it. It's not that interesting, but... Trump, Musk, Biden, two syllables. Obama, three. Huh? Yeah. Yeah. That's right. Sanders, two. It's like a simplified... I'm just saying, you know, there's something there. Yeah. There's something there. Does it instruct their simple solutions for things? But anyway, I would just say that... Finish your thought. Even if things are going badly, there may not be an off-ramp in their mind. No, that's certainly true. Before we go to this call, people out in Skypland, do you have anything to say? You've been kind of frozen there for a while. Now that we're talking about villains with one-syllable last names, I mean, going back through presidents, we've got Bush and also Bush. Yeah. But then there's Reagan. And then there's Nixon. But Kennedy. Kennedy, three. There's something there. Cheney has two syllables. Roosevelt. Roosevelt. Again, three. All right? Eisenhower, the best of all. Four syllables. And then Truman. Okay. I've said enough. Good evening. You're on off-look over time. Go ahead. Speak up. Is anybody... I just... Go ahead, you're on. Can you hear me? Yes. Yeah, no, I just wanted to say something about today. I was reading something where the president signed a, like, ban trans in sports kind of thing. I don't know what it's, some type of legislation that says trans can't compete in, I guess, with men or something, or with women, whatever, something like that. Trans women cannot compete in girls' or women's sports, yes. Something like that, yeah. He signed that legislation today. And I just find that this is like their new, like, this is like a new... I'm not even on either side of this trans thing. I'm not even pro-trans, and I'm just very neutral with this, but I just think this is like the new dog whistle with these Republicans, this whole trans thing. They just, they keep beating this thing to death. You know, there's like five trans people even in sports. I was reading something online that actually looked into this, and out of every sport you can think of, there's only three trans people playing at any kind of serious level. So this is about three people, this whole thing. There's only, if you combine every sport, only three of them. So, I mean, they're just making, they're just beating this thing to death, trans, trans. I don't know why this is, and this is like their new thing. It kind of just gets their gins up their base. Well, my theory, my theory is that it's relatively easy to scare people by saying that there are men in the locker room of women, and it's just, it's really the most absurd thing. You know, ask the people who are playing the sports without their parents hovering over them to tell them what to say. Ask them how they actually feel about this. Ask them how they feel about their teammates. Ask them if it's something that intimidates them in any way or is unfair to them. And listen to those answers. Not, you know, the elderly, white, male politicians that are using this to get people into a panic and to spread hatred around. Because that is what we are seeing repeatedly. Yeah. It's like an invasion of, they make it seem like there's millions of these people and they're all over, and you know, and he's just crazy. Yeah. I think, I think you nailed it. Aguila, go ahead. I mean, it's also the same exact rhetoric that's been used to fear monger about all kinds of groups since time immemorial. The exact same arguments that are getting made about trans people today were made about gay people 20 years ago, 30 years ago, were made about black people 60 or 70 years ago. They're going to move next to you. They're going to like, turn your kids. They're going to change the world. Here's the other question I have. How many of these people have ever been in a women's restroom? Because you know what we have in women's restrooms? Doors. Like, men's rooms have places where you all stand there and pee together, and we don't have that. Yes. That's true. In a public women's restroom, there is a certain expectation of privacy. And if maybe somebody knocks on your wall and says, hey, do you have a tampon? Then you pass a tampon under the door. We're not like running in on each other. And I think there is a general lack of understanding about what is actually happening here and attempting to be this big scary boogeyman. The first time that I was in a gender-free bathroom was at the Chaos Communication Congress. And, you know, I was in the building and I was in the bathroom and I was washing my hands. And I just looked to the right of me and said, oh, there's a woman standing next to me. Wow. That was it. I mean, what else can you possibly expect in a bathroom setting? You know, you're doing your business in a stall and then you're washing and then you're washing your hands. I mean, I think we can manage that. That's not that big a deal. And then in SeaTac Airport, Seattle, they have incredible bathrooms where, I don't spend a lot of time in public bathrooms, but these are two that I remember. And I remember going in there and basically there's like this kind of hallway where people are there with their baby carriages, families, and then there's stalls, you know, with doors that go all the way down to the floor. And you don't know who's behind the door. Could be a man. Could be a woman. Could be a child. You have no idea. It doesn't matter because once you come out, you're back in mixed society again. You know? So as long as people aren't going with you into the stall, this is a non-issue. But what these politicians have done, they've made it into a big issue with a lot of the voting public and they're panicking. And whenever anybody panics about something, it's likely they're being misled by the people in charge. I know. I know. I wish some of these voters can actually look into this and see that this is not, there's no epidemic here. There's not millions of these people. There's just very few of these people that even exist. You know, it's just, you know, I was reading something. It's like less than 1% of the American population is trans. This whole noise is about less than 1% of the American population. But even if it was 10%, it still wouldn't be an issue because they're not a threat, you know? I think that's the point that you're making. Go ahead, Carl. I just want to make two points. A big part of this is about visibility and resentment around the visibility because it might lead to questions that parents don't want to answer when it's brought up or if there's, you know, issues in the learning and learning environment, people with classmates. it kind of forces people to confront things that they may not be familiar with. And I think the increase in visibility and the discussion of it validates the existence of people who are there already. But by communicating and talking about it, it actually, you know, as difficult as it may be, it does support the understanding that you're amongst people in any of these public spaces at any one time that may not be, you know, may not have had the same experience in life as you at all, especially around their gender identity and where they're at with it and what is, what is going to help them thrive and feel safe in our society. And when you have people that understand they have their right to exist, you have support in vast numbers. But if you don't talk about it, it creates, I think, a much more dangerous environment because there is an understanding. And this thing about not being allowed in female spaces, I don't think people quite realize how much more dangerous people identifying in that way, how much more dangerous the time they would have in male spaces as sort of punishment or being relegated to that because of these kinds of attitudes. And it's essentially making female spaces as hostile, potentially, because of the kind of policing and discomfort that is being promoted around this. So, yeah, we're hearing more about it. we should be hearing more about people that are not like, you know, the family members we may encounter or our typical understandings, but it doesn't mean they're any less valid or that they aren't out there. So, yeah, in the past, they may not have had as much visibility, but it's in part due to my mind that they're getting a little bit more attention and they have, and with media and social media and the networks that we're using, the ability for that information to be in the discourse, good or bad, you know, mal-informed or otherwise, people are going to be more aware. So, we've got to counter that sort of negativity with, you know, the kind of support that being widely understood should be for these individuals and for all of us as a society. So, like, yeah, it's unfortunate it's being characterized this way, but we have to appreciate that this is an effect of, you know, the information age. We should be aware of this and we should not invalidate people because of their experience and with identity and so forth. So, that's just my take. Anyway, I enjoyed the show. I enjoyed the show. Thanks a lot for taking my call. All right, thanks for calling. Take care. All right, want to take one more phone call? Yes. We still have, like, at least twice as many listeners as we usually do, so more people want something to say. I don't know what's happening here, but it's amazing. Well, we haven't hit 100 yet, so I'm disappointed. It doesn't take much to redesign spaces, too, public spaces. Maybe if only three people called in, then I'd be at 90, and that's a compromise. That's a good high mark. Not called in, but connected. I don't know how it works. Yeah, and that brought the number down. 802-321-4225. Yes, Alex, looks like you have something. No, I was just hoping for a phone call. Okay. That was just my normal gesticulation. You just look like you had something to say, but I guess... No, no. I'm just a vapid void over here. That's disappointing, but... Do we have another phone call? We'll allow it. Yes, we do. All right. Good evening. You're on Off the Hook Overtime. Go ahead. Hi there. Going to end the show with Johnny Fusion. Hey, how you doing? Are you driving? I'm doing... What's that? Sounds like you're driving. I'm in a Lyft. Okay, well, then you're in a vehicle. You're in a vehicle. I got it right. Yeah. All right. Yeah, I was... It's like I was listening to Off the Hook and Overtime... Well, not Overtime, but Off the Hook on the WBA website using Stanford's Wi-Fi, but Stanford blocks it for some reason. They block very safe that, you know, public Wi-Fi, hospital, and stuff, but it was pretty easy to get around just by using a VPN. Wait, Stanford is blocking what now? The live stream at WBAI. They block WBAI? That's kind of weird. Is it because it's an applet, like a little thing on the main page? Well, they blocked the stream, not the website. Oh, okay. So you weren't doing it from their main page. You were just streaming on, like, VLC or something? I think he clicked on... No, I stream on the web page, but I have to use the VPN to do it. Okay, okay. So maybe it didn't like the country or the VPN somehow? I don't know if that's even possible. No, I think you had it right the first time. I think when he clicks on the applet or whatever it's called on the BAI website, I think there's something about that that Stanford doesn't like, but... Like running it in... It probably uses... You know, because there's other things, like my... Like, checking life would be blocked and stuff, you know? Well, okay. I don't know what it's called. Now that we've gotten past all these barriers, what's on your mind? Oh, I just... What a couple weeks it's been, huh? You could say that, yes. Yeah. It's crazy what's happening with Elon Musk and these young men who are doing his bidding in OPM in the Treasury Department. I just... Yeah. You know, this is a federal network and it's supposed to have all these protocols and security clearances and you know, basically to keep unauthorized access from this stuff and then just plug right into the Ethernet or whatever. Yeah. You know, there's another issue too in that these are agencies... Well, let's look at USAID. That is something that Kennedy basically came up with and it was approved by Congress and somebody just can't go in there and obliterate it. However, that is exactly what happened. Maybe, Alex, maybe you know something more about how it actually is supposed to work, but that's not right, right? I mean, somebody can't just go in because... I'm asking Alex, that's because somebody decides they don't like that organization. They can't just send somebody from the private sector in to obliterate it. Does that seem reasonable? No, it doesn't. It seems like it would require a more coordinated effort of government in order to do something like this, especially if it was created by statute, if it was created by Congress, it shouldn't be up to some kind of independent government contract to determine whether or not this program continues to exist. the president has a wide latitude and great discretion when it comes to things like the person public policy, but I don't think that without some kind of process and perhaps going through something like the Administrative Procedures Act, you can just dismantle bits and bobs of the federal government like this. it's really something we've never experienced before, so I don't necessarily have I think a really cogent answer to this. I really only have a gut feeling. And that's what I think they're counting on is people that don't really know for sure. Right? And the actors, the unelected agents employing this describing it, Musk himself saying that USAID has been put through the wood chipper, you know, like a Fargo reference. Yeah. Um, and the president himself is basically his, his big qualification for this is that he basically reckons that this is probably all right or not going to be a big deal. He was asked directly, doesn't this have to go through Congress? And he's like, no, I don't, I don't think so. But he doesn't know. Nobody seems to know because no one ever thought something like this could happen. And that's what you get when everyone has such fealty to him that they won't challenge anything. Oh, no one's going to, yeah, up until this point, let's say that, you know, people change, hopefully, but up until now, that's exactly the kind of thing that his loyalty expectations have demanded, and you then get no pushback and these things don't make sense. I almost wish I had spent my life, you know, bending the knee to Trump and becoming one of his trusted advisors just so that I could one day be in front of a camera and say, are you out of your goddamn mind? You can't do that. You must be crazy, you know, just for that one moment. And I think there are people out there now that have sacrificed their entire lives to this idiot. this is your opportunity to, you know, save yourself in history as somebody who actually stood up to him. Of course, you know, he'll make your life hell after that, but still, I think that rush, that feeling will be worth it. Go ahead, Gila. Okay, so I just found an amazing piece of information that I wanted to share because it's too cool not to. So, Representative Mark Pocan from Washington State introduced a bill today into the House entitled The Eliminate Looting of Our Nation by Mitigating Unethical State Kleptocracy. That spells Elon Musk, doesn't it? It sure does. I love it. I love it. But, you know, the Patriot Act spells something, too. They can't just come up with words. They have to make them spell things. So, the fact that the Elon Musk Act seeking to ban special government employees from obtaining federal contracts. Okay, all right. I just, I like, it's petty and I kind of love it. It's one of your people, Kyle. Move that along. Yeah, I've been getting surveys and, you know, representative, very active inquiry from politicians there that are seeking comment. So, definitely, I'll be contributing to the discourse there. And I hope everyone else in the country in every locality is having the same kinds of conversations, challenging as they may be. It's important to talk about it and to make your voice heard. Johnny, any final words? Yes, it's important to realize that laws don't prevent anyone from doing anything. They just offer a remedy for when they're broken. So, even though these actions doge and Trump are blatantly illegal, the law won't stop anyone from committing crimes. I mean, as a former blackhead actor, I know that very well. You know, I've done illegal things, that there was a law saying I couldn't do it. It wasn't a deterrent. And these people have escaped justice their entire lives because of their wealth. You know, and Trump even more recently with his so-called sentencing for his felony, he skated by. The law can't stop anything. It can only offer remedies. And with the courts captured by the right wing how it is now, there's nothing to stop them. Well, there will be. There will be. And we're going to leave it there. Nothing in the government. We have to have non-governmental solutions. Well, it can be arranged. It can be arranged. Anyway, thanks for the call. Get where you're going safely. Good night, everyone. And we'll talk to you again in the future. Thank you. All right. And I guess that's going to be our last call for tonight. Any closing thoughts, folks? Go ahead, Alex. Sure. There are, a number of lawsuits that are challenging the legality of the actions of this doge in abolishing certain aspects of the federal government. And I do think the gut reaction here is right that the president just shouldn't be able to do that. if you're thinking about very basic civics in terms of the separation of powers of the executive branch, legislative branch, and the judicial branch, and Congress is the legislative branch, the executive branch should not be able to repeal or undo anything that Congress does without Congress repealing that law or undoing it themselves. So I think that the doge's actions in dismantling many aspects of these federal programs that have been created by law are very likely to face significant challenges in courts, and I think some of these actions will probably be overturned. But we'll see. But Alex, you know, even if the actions are overturned, the damage is almost unfensible. There's definitely damage. I mean, you know, I know archive.org is grabbing a lot of the, has grabbed a lot of the webpages that have been shut down, but, you know, a lot hasn't been, and a lot of things have been changed that, you know, won't be easily discoverable as far as what got changed and what didn't. And, you know, the very real possibility and certainty, in fact, that personal data has been compromised. Lots of it, maybe all of it. Maybe it's on flash drives, maybe it's on hard drives and other places. All kinds of systems have been plugged in that shouldn't have been plugged in because they didn't go through the procedure that is part of how they run things. They thought it was stupid, so they just bypassed it. And they intimidated their way into these establishments. And we found out, you know, our institutions are a lot weaker than we thought they were. So that's kind of sobering. Gila, did you have something? I did, actually. So first of all, I want to say we still have 75 people with us right now, which is insane. But also we just tooted something on the show's Mastodon page, which is an opportunity that if you want to do something right now and you want to do something tangible, there is a repository on GitHub that will help you contribute CPU time to help the Internet Archive download and archive government pages right now. So if you go to our Mastodon page, which is at off the hook at hackers.town, you can find out more about participating in that project. You can also go to github slash archive team slash us government dash grab and learn more about this project there as well. Okay, and we'll hopefully get that info and send that out over the 2600 social media accounts and hopefully more people can can spread the word that way as well, because we really do need to we need to support each other. You're muted Gila. If I could point out one other thing I heard recently from a very smart person that I know self-care is punk as fuck. And the thing is, if we burn out now, we can't accomplish anything and there's a fire hose of shit right now and if you get overwhelmed by the fire hose of shit, you can't make change. So make sure you're taking care of yourself in addition to taking care of other people. But if you can grab the fire hose at the same time and point it in a different direction, by all means, go for it. Exactly. Yes, Alex. As a counterpoint, I'm very often bring up these counterpoints. I'd like to quote the Kurgan from the original Highlander. It's better to burn out than to fade away. But Neil Young said that. Maybe he didn't. Who didn't say that? A lot of people say that. But, you know, to quote the Beatles, good night. Yeah, that was the last song on the White album. We're done, right? Yeah. Any final thoughts, Kyle? Mess with the best, die like the rest. Oh, that's the one. That's the one to go out with. Okay, everybody please write to us, OTH at 2600.com. We'd love to hear from you. Yes, Kila. Quick question, what is our format for next week? What does that mean, our format? It means, are we taking calls on the show, or are we doing overtime next week? Oh, I thought it was like beta or VHS. Well, it depends what the date is. Do you know what the date is? Next week is the 12th. That's mighty close to the middle of the month, so maybe we are taking phone calls next week, which means there will be no overtime next week. Ooh, that's a tough one. That's a tough one. How about we meet about that and see? So the way it works, folks, once a month we take phone calls on the radio show, but taking phone calls really wears us out, so we don't have the energy to do overtime after doing that. Plus, it's pretty much the same format as overtime except it's over the air, but it's shorter, and it ends at 7.55, which means that's it for that week. But if we don't take phone calls off the hook, then we have overtime where we do take phone calls afterwards, and that can go, wow, it went an hour and a half tonight. Sometimes it costs longer, sometimes it doesn't. So we'll tell you by next week. How about that? That sounds great. I was just curious. All right, meetings again this Friday, 2600 meetings. Hopefully some Canadian 2600 meetings will start being born. That would be great. And, yeah, try to find that copy of 2600 at your local bookstore before they're all gone, because the Elon cover apparently is quite popular. Who knew? All right, good night, everybody. We're going to look for it in a couple weeks. See you next week.