|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
REBUTTAL BY
The old proverb, "politics makes strange bedfellows," certainly applies to today's rebuttal regarding the "anti-Semitic" ™ tweets and statements from Demonrat Ilhan Omar, such as, “I want to talk about the political influence in this country that says it is okay to push for allegiance to a foreign country (Israel)." Just for this one moment and just for this one incident, "The Editorial Board" of The Anti-New York Times must proudly say to Ilhan Omar, that freshman big mouth Somali communist congresswomen from Minnesota -- "Tell it sista! Tell it! And
oh how the elite lefties are tied up in knots over this. On the one hand, they can't go too rough on a triple-protected "minority"
(female, black and alien) who already has 700,000 twitter followers. But on the other, any talk of Jews putting their
interests ahead of their host nations is strictly forbidden in "the land of the free." What to do with a girl like
Ilhan? The sassy Somali is now causing almost as much trouble and embarrassment for the Demonrats as fellow freshman flame-thrower
(and possible NSA/Trump plant), Alexandria Ocasio Cortez (3.5 million Twitter followers)
Recklessly outspoken millennial Cortez and Generation X'er Omar are very close and cannot be touched by the nervously paralyzed elders of the Demonrat Party.
As a "Republican't "neo-con," Slimes columnist Bret Stephens (cough cough) doesn't have to restrain himself like the Demonrat Jews do. In this whiny rant, he not only reveals for us that Omar has clearly struck a nerve (the truth always does), but he also confirms the fact that the Demonrats don't know how to deal with her. "There’s an old joke about upper-class British anti-Semitism: It means someone who hates Jews more than is strictly necessary. Ilhan Omar more than meets that standard. Omar, however, isn’t just a critic of Israel. Last month, she wrote that U.S. support for Israel was “all about the Benjamins baby.” ... Confronted with criticism about the remark from her fellow Democrat Nita Lowey, she replied: “I should not be expected to have allegiance/pledge support to a foreign country in order to serve in Congress.” It’s also a case study in the insidious cunning and
latent power of anti-Jewish bigotry... ... she wraps herself in the flag, sounding almost like Pat Buchanan when he
called Congress “Israeli-occupied” territory. As the criticism of Omar mounts, it becomes that much easier for her to seem like the victim of a smear campaign, rather than the instigator of a smear. The secret of anti-Semitism has always rested, in part, on creating the perception that the anti-Semite is, in fact, the victim of the Jews and their allies. ... If Pelosi can’t muster a powerful and unequivocal resolution condemning anti-Semitism, then Omar will have secured her political future and won a critical battle for the soul of the Democratic Party. " (emphasis added) This just in! -- As a result of heavy push-back from the suddenly mighty Ocasio-Cortez and her twitter hordes
of crazed kiddies, Pelosi was forced to put her tail between her legs and pull back the expected condemnation of Omar. Headline:
New York Slimes: Pelosi
Says Omar Unaware of Israel Words Impact "House Speaker Nancy Pelosi says freshman Democrat Ilhan Omar didn't realize her words about Israel would sound anti-Semitic to some powerful members of Congress. Omar's comment that a pledge of "allegiance" to the Jewish state is expected of lawmakers sparked enough outrage to split Democrats and throw their agenda into question."
1. Self described "Never Trumper" Bret Stephens plays the "anti-Semitism" card in response to Omar's truthful tweets and statements. // 2. After embracing female freshmen Frankensteins like Jahana Hayes, Ocasio-Cortez and Ilhan Omar (pictured on cover of Rolling Stone with Speaker Pelosi), the House Speaker has been repeatedly attacked and humiliated by them. // 3. Nutty Demonrat Freshman Rashida Tlaib's stated pledge to "impeach that mother f*cker (Trump) also proved very embarrassing for Pelosi
This latest tempest stirred up by one of the freshman
crazies is triply delightful to behold. Here's why: 1. It is adding to the growing disunity now openly
visible in the previously monolithic Demonrat Party 2. It is scaring away many "moderate" voters away from the Demonrats 3. It is bringing badly-needed publicity
to the the issue of Israel Firstism / dual loyalty Perched upon her lofty cloud from the afterlife, the Crazed Conspiracy Cat is channelling
to the depleted Board that these recklessly insane circus clowns may all be NSA sleepers sent to severely sabotage
the Demonrats. Perhaps that's a bit of a stretch, but the Editor-in-Chief will say this: If indeed one were to script such
a covert operation aimed at imploding the Demonrat Party, the results couldn't be any better than what we are now witnessing.
As even many libtards now admit, these out-of-control and beyond-control freshman females are inflicting enormous damage upon
the Demonrat brand -- and the worst may be yet to come. 1. No matter
how much controversy they cause, Demonrats Cortez, Omar and Tlaib can now say and do whatever they want --- and no elder Demonrat
will dare to tame them. // 2. There are many other freshmen double "minority" and triple "minority" crazies
now backing up Cortez, Omar and Tlaib. // 3. A Demonrat Party split between older closeted Marxists and younger
outspoken Marxists serves Trump's interests because he can campaign against the latter group ---
and much of this was made possible by the forced resignations of scores of anti-Trump Republicant Congressman. Hmmmm.
* ![]() Boobus
Americanus
1: I read a column in the New York
Times today suggesting that the Democrats are afraid to condemn that Somali Congresswomen for her anti-Semitic
remarks. Boobus
Americanus 2: You know. I hate to say this because I really don't like Trump -- but some of these
freshmen Democrats in Congress are really starting to scare me.
St. Sugar: Boobuss, my dim-witted mortal friend -- the
only difference between these fresshman femaless and the old guard Demonratss is that they are actually showing you their
cardss. Editor:
And any poker player who does that is sure to lose. COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS
greattomatobubble2@gmail.com |
|
WEDNESDAY / MARCH 6, 2019
|

A T. rex model at the American Museum of Natural History's "T. Rex: The Ultimate Predator" exhibit in New York
|
REBUTTAL BY
The demented cult of make-believe"scientism" -- not to be confused with actual observational and experimental science -- has insanely twisted many fields of study beyond the recognition of the sane mind. The four most extreme examples apply to the fields of psychology, cosmology, climatology, and, today's subject, paleontology. Get a load of this madness, from the article (wise-cracks added in red): “ 'It took evolution a long time to make T. rex,' said Stephen Brusatte, a paleontologist
at the University of Edinburgh and author of a recent book on dinosaurs. (Cha
Ching!) Most of the early tyrannosaurs were small, some as small as a chicken (palm to face, sighing, shaking head). Many were dog-size to deer-size. These earlier tyrannosaurs were not the top predators for most of those 100 million years.'" (numbers pulled out of his ass)
With absolute certainty and in total unison, the High Priests of the Magic Church of Paleontology
chant that the creatures they have dubbed "dinosaurs" died out "66 million
years ago ™." (Satanist
alert! Satanist alert!) Google: "sixty six million years ago" and see. That's interesting because
the High Priests of the Magic Church of Cosmology
preach that Earth is moving through space at "66,000 miles per hour ™."
(Satanist alert! Satanist alert!) As all "educated" should
know by now, the "dinosaurs" were wiped out by an asteroid strike "66" million
years ago ™, and the speedy Earth moves through space at "66"
thousand miles per hour ™.
The
Slimes article about an upcoming "Tyrannosaurus Rex" exhibit at New York's famed "Tyrannosaurus Rex is still the biggest, baddest land predator of all time. It was the size of a city bus. ... Scientists are just as smitten as the rest of us. After T. rex was first described in 1905, the world’s most charismatic megafossil could have turned out to be a mere curiosity. There was no guarantee more would be found, nor could anyone anticipate how interesting its history would turn out to be. But for more than 100 years, T. rex has been an extraordinary gift to the study of dinosaurs, and perhaps to science in general." Now this might come as a surprise to "youse guys," and may even smack of "Crazy Town" talk. But the fact of the matter is that the "scientists" who have wasted their lives "studying" these fairy tales do not know what the creatures linked to certain fossils looked like, nor how long ago they "disappeared." The museum exhibits are artistic renderings based on incomplete remains and some creative conjecture. In many cases, the actual incomplete remnants of creatures unknown, or misclassified, are kept in "temples" which only the well-kept High Priests of Fake Academia can access.
This is not to suggest that some very large species did not exist and die out many centuries ago. What we do not know however is what they looked like, when they disappeared, and why. And even some of the more honest (though still insane) paleontologists will concede this fact. Dinosaur "expert" and "science writer" Brian Switek: "Once you put up a dinosaur skeleton it’s very, very difficult to take it back down again. There are actually some very wrong dinosaurs that are still up in a lot of institutions. If you go the American Museum of Natural History in New York City you’ll see dinosaurs that have broken tails and broken backs, they’re still dragging their tails, they’re still looking as they did in the early 20th century just because it’s impossible to remove them from the plaster and the armatures that they were put on. One of the greatest things
about science is that it’s always changing, based on new evidence. But it’s hard for us to let go of
our emotional ties to what we once knew to be true." (emphasis added)
As for the motives behind Fake Paleontology, well, it appears to trace back to the usual suspects and for the usual reasons; namely, the acquisition of money and the promotion of atheism -- a "twofer." Modern Dinosauerism -- a very lucrative industry dominated by "Jewish intellectuals" -- and its associated multi-billion year old Earthism are always closely linked to atheistic Evolution ™. You see, if at one time "dinosaurs ruled the Earth" ™ while the unrecognizable ancestors of us humans were still swimming in the ocean or crawling through slime pits; then mankind -- the unintended product of blind random forces -- ain't so special after all. It is such a pathetic and hopeless world-view for humanity, but a dogma that is very good for the modern day monsters who lord over us.
Giants of "Paleontology" --- Tilly Edinger (cough cough), Deon Lessum (cough cough), Stephen Jay Gould (cough cough)
* ![]() Boobus
Americanus
1: I read in the New York Times
today that a new T-Rex exhibit is coming to the Museum of Natural History. Boobus
Americanus
2: Awesome! My kids love dinosauers!
St. Sugar: Be ssure to tell your idiot kidss that it'ss
all jusst plasster and fiction. Editor: Wouldn't it be funny if what they call a "Tyrannosaurus Rex" was actually a gentle plant
eater half the size of what they say it was? COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS
greattomatobubble2@gmail.com |
|
TUESDAY / MARCH 5, 2019
|

|
REBUTTAL BY
Slimes' columnist David Brooks (cough cough) plays his assigned role as the main in-house "conservative" columnist for Manhattan's mendaciously Marxist manure factory. You can always sniff out a fake house-conservative by the half-hearted manner in which he will oppose the Globalist-Communist scheme of the day. Scum like Brooks will never firmly combat the schemes of the Left based upon philosophical principles and sound logic. No, the watered-down "opposition" always accepts the flawed premise of every commie-libtard argument, while politely objecting to the risks of "moving too fast," or meekly questioning the costs and challenges of transition. A typical example of such fake "opposition," from Brook's article: "The Brits and Canadians I know certainly love their single-payer health care systems. If one of their politicians suggested they should switch to the American health care model, they’d throw him out the window. So single-payer health care, or in our case “Medicare for all,” is worth taking seriously. I’ve just never understood how we get from here to there, how we transition from our current system to the one Bernie Sanders has proposed and Elizabeth Warren, Kamala Harris and others have endorsed." Ya hear that? Brooksie thinks Communism is great! He just doesn't know how we would transition to such a system without causing discomfort or dislocation to existing health care workers. Oy frickin' vey. With "conservatives" like Brooks, who needs libtards?
1. Having been born and raised into a shitty system that requires high taxes and ever-increasing rationisng, those pathetic, beaten-down Brits who "love" their NHS (National Health System) simply don't know any better. // 2. PBS News features "conservative" David Brooks and "liberal" Mark Shields in an unintended comedy skit in which the two "opposing" ass-clowns agree on just about everything! // 3. The 19th Century French economist, Frederic Bastiat, explained simply and eloquently that government goodies, far from being "free" to the public, place an enormous burden on the private economy.
The tragic irony of America's worsening heath care / health insurance crisis is that although
there are few, if any, free-market forces operating in this critical sector, many sorry specimens
of Boobus Americanus -- miseducated by the Marxified "educational system," misinformed by
the Marxified Fake News, purposely misdirected by house "conservatives" like Brooks, and totally ignorant of the
action-reaction dynamic -- are now blaming the free market for the systemic inefficiencies, abuses,
job-market rigging (doctor shortages) and price-gouging of a perverse system of third party
payers that is actually a bastardized hybrid of cartel capitalism and government communism. The Globalist-Marxist crime syndicate that engineered this disaster is not ignorant of economic
principles, of course. To the contrary, the high-level financial elites who own the U.S. government-media
complex are experts in the field. The deliberately, and brilliantly, engineered inefficiencies
and price-gouging are intended to cause so much pain for the uninsured that eventually the public
(broke-ass libtarded "millennials" in particular) will rise up and demand cradle-to-grave,
nanny-state, "democratic socialism" --- a high-sounding euphemism for "3-hots-and-a-cot"
slavery by way of the ballot box. Marxist vermin such as Bernie
Sanders (cough cough) peddle unworkable Utopian schemes to naive young people who
were put into a desperate situation by policies implemented by ..... Marxist vermin
such as Bernie Sanders (cough cough) in the first place! Getting back to the main observation of today's rebuttal and closing
with it -- the "split-the-difference" fake philosophy of Brooks, by design, amounts to ceding the football match
(American football) to the Marxists by allowing them easy runs of five yards at a time, whenever big plays of 20
+ yards are not available to them. In due time, whether the Reds advance 5 yards at a time or 20, they will eventually cross
the goal-line nonetheless. The idea of stopping the adversary in his tracks, recovering the football, and running the other
way --- never occurs to these house "conservatives." That's because the game is rigged. ![]() ![]() When "center
right" scum like David Brooks yield enough small yardage "first-downs" toward the left
side of the field, it's just as effective as granting Coach Marx's team a 70-yard strike all at once.
* ![]() Boobus
Americanus
1: I read a column by David Brooks
in the New York Times today. He suggests that socialized medicine is an idea that should be taken seriously,
but is concerned with how we can transition to it without causing a lot of problems. Boobus
Americanus
2: Brooks is a reasonable conservative. He understands that we can't always move too fast on such matters.
St. Sugar: Brookss is a no-good lying sneaky frickin'
%^$# putting up a fake sstraw man fight againsst hiss commie co-consspiratorss. Editor: Brooks has often been referred to as "the
liberals' favorite conservative." COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS
greattomatobubble2@gmail.com |
|
MONDAY / MARCH 4, 2019
|

|
REBUTTAL BY
Just over two full years into his first term, Donald Trump, in defiance of the Deep State and many within his own party, has ended the war in Syria; stymied Satanyahoo's dream of a war with Iran; thawed the cold war that had been raging against Russia and China; charted a course for officially ending the Korean War and peacefuly reuniting North & South Korea, and now, is pulling out of West Africa. Lo and behold, the "give peace a chance" crowd -- who were only dovish when it came to fighting communists -- are pissed off about it all. From the article: "President Trump has ordered most American troops to withdraw from Syria. He wants to bring home thousands more from Afghanistan. Now hundreds of United States commandos and other forces are leaving West Africa — despite an onslaught of attacks from an increasingly deadly matrix of Islamist fighters." In 2014,
the Globalists activated all of their Deep State assets to push the corny "Bring Back Our Girls" scam that was used
to justify the deployment of U.S. / NATO troops to West Africa in order to "stop the "Boko Haram" terrorist
group. * ![]() The Ebola scam of that same year
was also used as a pretext for greater "humanitarian" involvement in the region --- with U.S. troop "conveeeniently"
being called upon as social workers to deliver "aid." The "ISIS"
or "ISIS affiliate" scam worked the same in Africa as it did in Syria and Iraq. The CIA / Mossad Axis recruited
mercenary "terrorists" to act all crazy -- so that the Fake News was able to provide the protective cover needed
for policy makers to send in the ultimate mercenaries of the New World Order -- the big bad U.S. military
(with NATO sidekicks). Beneath the sappy soap opera saga about "kidnapped girls," the true objective, as
always, was make sure that any uppity African leader with an inkling of buddying up to Russia or China; or of developing his
nation's own natural resources -- was made to stay on the Globalist plantation. A lot of time, creativity and expense
went in to developing these sophisticated maneuvers ("Save Darfur" and "Get Joseph Kony" were other
variations). And now that Trump is taking it all away, Sulzberger's Slimes has even more reason to spew venom at him.
The "human rights" ™
mouthpieces of George Soros are also upset over this. From the article: “The U.S. refocus, which has taken resources away from Africa, is shortsighted and in contrast to the long
game being used by abusive Islamist groups,” said Corinne Dufka, associate director for West Africa at Human
Rights Watch in Washington." If the henchmen of Sulzberger and Soros are against this, that alone is evidence that Trump is doing
the right thing in Africa. ![]() 1.
Deep Stater Corinne Dufka feigns concern about "human rights. ™"
// 2. International "counterterrorism exercises" draw 1000's of military personnel from many 30 African and Western
countries. The game is about power and control --- not "fighting terrorism." The Globalists have been obsessed with China's (and to a lesser extent, Russia's)
growing role in helping to develop Africa. Of course, the Chinese presence throughout Africa isn't for charity purposes. China
needs resources and Africa has got plenty that haven't even been touched. But putting motives aside, the fact remains that
the voluntary Africa-China relationship is mutually beneficial; and neither a stronger nationalist China nor an African
continent lifting its living standards are in the interest of the NWO gang. No sir. They want China (and Russia) out
of Africa and all nations on that continent obedient and dependent upon foreign aid. A few hysterical headlines from Establishment
Fake News reveal the game:
And about Russia, more headlines:
And on and on it goes. But what the hired hacks of Fake News and Fake Academia never seem
to be able to explain away is the fact that China and Russia are conducting their ![]() 1 & 2. Xi and Putin offer friendship
and mutual benefits to Africa -- while the militaristic Globalists whine about "exploitation." // 3. Trump (who
is popular in Africa) wants to pursue a similar policy of cooperation. He is absolutely correct in removing troops who were
sent to Africa under false pretexts.
* ![]() Boobus
Americanus
1: I read in the New York Times
today that Trump wants to pull out of Africa now. Boobus
Americanus 2: Did the Boko
Haram terrorists ever bring back those girls? Editor: The scriptwriters
at LHS (Langley-Hollywood Studios) must crack-up laughing as they pen these goofy story-lines. COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS
greattomatobubble2@gmail.com |
|
FRIDAY / MARCH 1, 2019
|

|
REBUTTAL BY
More than a quarter of a century ago -- June of 1993 to be precise -- just two months after co-Presidents Clinton & Clinton burned 17 little children alive at Waco, Texas, the demented duo torched the entire nation by placing a putrid little ACLU Marxist hag on the United States Supreme Court -- for life (and then some?). Ruth Bader Ginsburg (cough cough) -- who, if indeed still alive, will turn 86 in a few weeks. Already known to now have difficulty staying awake and speaking coherently, a growing number of "conspiracy theorists" ™ are openly speculating that the powers of the Left are pulling a "Weekend at Ruthie's" scenario -- explaining away her long absence on the court due to "cancer treatments" and arranging for a body double to show up at public places from time to time. Although we're not certain about the matter -- the fact that she was later allowed to vote from her hospital bed; and that FOX News had briefly announced her death, really intrigues the heck out of us (here) and here). We do believe that dead or alive, St. Ruthie of Libtardia, even by Marxist standards, is now mentally incapacitated. ![]() 1. Appointed by Slick Willie in 1993 and puffed-up by the Fake News ever since. // 2. Why did FOX briefly report her death last month? // 3. Like the comedy movie "Weekend at Bernie's" --- might the Deep State be keeping her "alive" as long as possible? .
In spite of her well-known and thoroughly documented
legal and social radicalism on matters pertaining to baby-killing, judicial activism, "gender discrimination," pornography,
crime, race quotas, vote fraud, open borders, "homosexual rights," child sexuality / age-of-consent, religious tolerance
and time spent lawyering for the ![]() 1. Ruth Bader
Ginsburg is an America-hating ACLU Communist. // 2-4. In spite of her proven history of Marxist radicalism, Senators Smith,
Helms (deceased) and Nickles were the only Republicans to stand firm against Ruthie-mania
in 1993. Red Ruthie's subsequent
26 years of misruling "on the bench" (and in the hospital bed) have confirmed the wisdom of the three brave
Senators. Compared to this hideous hag, even the other crazed Marxists on the Supreme Court seem almost reasonable! As this
article explains, Ginsburg the Ghoul was among the legal pioneers to argue in favor of not only forcing military academies
to accept females (Ginsburg penned the majority opinion for that ruling in 1996); but also for drafting women ("selective
service" registration) and sending them into combat. This hasn't happened yet but will if Red Ruthie has her say
about an appeal of a recent lower court ruling that is expected to be challenged. When it
comes to "anti-Semitic" ™ stereotypes,
R.B.G. is / was a caricature of her Jew York City self. Little Joey Goebbels and his cartoonists would have
had a field day lampooning this nasty little monster. The damage that this wicked yenta from hell, this black-robed
tyrant, this demented dwarf has inflicted upon America is as immense as it is irreversible. For the sake of self preservation,
we can only hope that this rancid thing really has descended into the sulfur pit; and that any "Weekend at Ruthie's"
charade will be forced to terminate soon. ![]() 1. As far back as 2015, Ginsburg
(falling asleep at Obongo's State of the Union speech) was losing her mental marbles. But because nobody believed that Trump
would win, she grimly hung on to her seat instead of retiring. // 2. Ginsburg thinks it's "OK" for adults to have
sexual intercourse with 12-year-olds.
* ![]() Boobus
Americanus
1: I read in the New York Times
today that Ruth Bader Ginsburg wants to apply the selective service draft registration to women. Boobus
Americanus
2: I don't see a problem with that in this day and age.
St. Sugar: Sschool thesse ass-clownss on chivalry for
me, will ya chief? St. Adolf: "All
I can say about this type of female equality -- I have experienced war. I know
how hard it is. I know how many men’s nerves have been shattered by war. I have often seen them
return by the dozens, doddering, completely ruined and broken. The idea that a girl or woman should
take this upon herself --- I could have no respect for German men then. As long as we have a healthy
male gender in Germany, no female sharpshooters or grenadiers will be trained in Germany. That is no
equality, but rather, inferior rights for women because it is much harder for her than men. We won’t
do it – because for us, the woman has been the most faithful work and life companion of the man
at all times." Editor: Tell it boss. Tell it! COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS
greattomatobubble2@gmail.com
AFTER FIVE YEARS, AMAZON JUST BANNED THE "PLANET ROTHSCHILD" BOOKS! MAJOR BLOW TO TOMATOBUBBLE (AGAIN!) If you're not
already a supporter, we could sure use your help -- again. It's quick, easy, private & 100% secure to sign-up as a patron and either AUTO-DONATE monthly OR just a SINGLE DONATION.
|