Ehud Barak – Architect of 9-11
By Christopher Bollyn, September 11, 2009
Eight years after 9-11, the American people and the U.S. government are still woefully misinformed about what actually happened on September 11, 2001. The media version of events, accepted by most Americans, is based on a completely false understanding of the terror atrocity that changed America – and the world. This is, however, no accident. This is how Israeli false-flag terrorism is designed to work.
The terror attacks of 9-11 were planned and carried out by Zionist extremists with the intention that the blame would be assigned to Islamic terrorists based in Afghanistan. Israeli military leaders and the Zionist-controlled media were well prepared to interpret the attacks so that public opinion would blame Muslims and Arabs for the atrocity. Changing public opinion is the primary mission of the architects of false-flag terrorism.
The evidence, however, indicates that the terror atrocity of 9-11 was not carried out by Osama Bin Laden, Al Qaida, the Taliban, or any Muslim entity. The discovery of chips of nano-thermite in the dust of the demolished World Trade Center has fully exposed the official version, promoted by the controlled media for eight years, as nothing but a pack of lies. Whoever applied tons of super-thermite to the Twin Towers had unrestricted access to every floor of the buildings – and state of the art nano-technology explosives. This was certainly not Osama Bin Laden and his gang of twenty.
Thousands of American, Afghani, and Iraqi lives have been lost as a result of the false understanding of 9-11, and the map of the Middle East has been redrawn. This is intentional, of course, and the Zionist-controlled media has been the most important supporter of the lies that surround 9-11. In the United States, the false interpretation of 9-11 has been vigorously promoted by Rupert Murdoch’s FOX News and News Corporation, CNN/Time Warner, the New York Times, and other Zionist-controlled news networks.
The lies about 9-11 were prepared in advance to kick-start a U.S.-led military campaign across the Middle East that would result in American troops being permanently based across the region to support the fortress state of Israel and its Zionist hegemony. This is what is called the “War on Terror,” which has been the Israeli plan since the mid-1980s, as articulated by Israel’s current prime minister from the far-right Likud party, Benjamin “Bibi” Netanyahu. This extreme Zionist strategy became U.S. policy in the aftermath of 9-11. It was planned that way, of course.
The invasion of Afghanistan, the response of President George W. Bush to 9-11, has been called “Obama’s war” because of President Barack Obama’s escalation of the nearly eight-year-old war of occupation. Despite the discovery of super-thermite in the dust of the World Trade Center, Obama continues to push the war in Afghanistan as a response to 9-11: “Let us renew our resolve against those who perpetrated this barbaric act and plot against us still,” Obama said at the Pentagon’s eighth anniversary ceremony. ”In pursuit of al Qaeda and its extremist allies we will never falter,” he said.
The war in Afghanistan, begun on 7 October 2001, cannot rightly be called Obama’s war. It can, however, be called “Barak’s war” if we mean Ehud Barak, the current Israeli defense minister and former prime minister. Barak was the first person to call for a U.S. war against Afghanistan and the chief architect of 9-11. By being the first to interpret the attacks and articulate the desired response, Barak revealed his role as a chief architect of 9-11.
The false-flag terrorist troika: Shimon Peres, Bibi Netanyahu, and Ehud Barak
The Israeli leaders Benjamin Netanyahu and Ehud Barak were among the very first people to blame Osama Bin Laden for 9-11 and call for military action against the Taliban-led regime in Afghanistan. The false-flag attacks were designed and then used by these Israeli leaders to start their long-planned “War on Terror,” an Israeli military strategy pushed by Netanyahu for many years. The U.S. military presence in Afghanistan and Iraq allows Israel to carry out covert murderous false-flag terror operations in these beleaguered nations, acts that are effectively disguised as “sectarian” violence by the Zionist-controlled media.
It needs to be understood that Israel is, unlike any Western nation, a state that is run by the military. It is often said in Israel that while some of the Zionists wanted Athens, they got Sparta. The Israeli military/security establishment dominates the political affairs of the nation and has done so for decades. Seven of Israel’s sixteen defense ministers, for example, were also serving as prime ministers. Four of them, Moshe Dayan, Yitzhak Rabin, Ehud Barak, and Shaul Mofaz, also served as Chief of Staff of the military. This is essential to understanding Ehud Barak’s key role in 9-11.
Ehud Barak, the current defense minister, was both prime minister and defense minister of Israel from 1999 until March 2001. As defense minister, Barak led the criminal aggression known as Operation Cast Lead against the civilian population of Gaza from December 2008 through January 2009. Although Israeli forces under Barak’s command committed egregious war crimes in Gaza, neither Israel nor Ehud Barak has been held accountable by the international community. The Israeli military, for example, flagrantly used banned white phosphorous bombs on the civilian population and intentionally bombed an American-run school and U.N. compound. The Israeli assault killed some 1,300 civilians.
Just this week, defense minister Barak approved the building of some 500 housing units on illegally occupied Palestinian land without a word of protest from the administration of Barack Obama, which has openly demanded an end to illegal Zionist construction in the occupied territories. The position taken by the Obama administration is, however, merely a false front meant to placate Arab states and public concerns about Israeli crimes in Palestine. In the same way, president-elect Obama said he would have plenty to say about Israeli war crimes committed in Gaza after he was inaugurated. He has, however, been completely silent about Israeli war crimes.
EHUD BARAK AND 9-11
Daniel Lewin (Flight 11) was once a member of Sayeret Matkal.
Ehud Barak is a chief architect of 9-11. As Israel’s highest military strategist in political office, his role in the false-flag terror attacks of 9-11 was at the highest architectural level. As the Israeli prime minister and defense minister from 1999 through March 2001, Barak was at the top of Israel’s political and military establishment when the false-flag terror attack was being prepared. Although Barak was replaced as prime minister by Ariel Sharon six months before 9-11, the project had been planned and was set to go before Barak left office. Barak was given a high-paying position with Electronic Data Systems, an American company, only hours before the 9-11 attacks. Israeli crimes like 9-11 and the murder of President John F. Kennedy are planned well in advance and compartmentalized for operation security.
Outside observers were surprised when the extremely hawkish right-wing Likud prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu took Barak, head of the Labor party, as his defense minister. The key fact to be considered in this relationship is that Barak was Netanyahu’s commanding officer when they were both active in Israel’s elite commando force, the Sayeret Matkal.
Ehud Barak was Netanyahu’s commanding officer in the Sayeret Matkal. Here they attend a June 2009 memorial ceremony for Netanyahu’s brother who died in the Entebbe operation headed by Barak.
INCOG MAN NOTE:
Flight 11 stewardess, Betty Ong, called American Airline’s reservation clerk Nydia Gonzalez and talked to her for over 20 minutes as the jet made it’s way towards the north tower of the WTC. She is said to have reported that the passenger in 9B (whom she called him “Daniel Lord”) was shot and killed by someone in 10B, or possibly even one of the pilots at the start of the hijackings.
Later, FBI interview reports say ”BETTY stated the individual who was seated in 9B, further described as [REDACTED by the FBI, for some reason] appeared to be dead.” The full recording or transcripts of her phone call is never released to the public and ATC ground control recordings were ordered destroyed.
The first FAA memo written that day by several officials privy to the conversation (5:30 pm) had the passenger in 10B specifically shooting Lewin, but later changed to the terrorists stabbing him. The final memo was never released.
A leaked Federal Aviation Administration memo written on the evening of Sept. 11 contains disturbing revelations about American Airlines Flight 11, the first to hit the World Trade Center. The “Executive Summary,” based on information relayed by a flight attendant to the American Airlines Operation Center, stated “that a passenger located in seat 10B shot and killed a passenger in seat 9B at 9:20 a.m. The passenger killed was Daniel Lewin, shot by passenger Satam Al Suqami.” The FAA has claimed that the document is a “first draft,” declining to release the final draft, as it is “protected information,” noting the inaccuracies in reported times, etc. The final draft omits all mention of gunfire. Lewin, a 31 year-old dual American-Israeli citizen was a graduate of MIT and Israel’s Technion. Lewin had emigrated to Israel with his parents at age 14 and had worked at IBM’s research lab in Haifa, Israel. Lewin was a co-founder and chief technology officer of Akamai Technologies, and lived in Boston with his family. A report in Ha’aretz on Sept. 17 identified Lewin as a former member of the Israel Defense Force Sayeret Matkal, a top-secret counter-terrorist unit, whose Unit 269 specializes in counter-terrorism activities outside of Israel.
294 comments
Comments feed for this article
September 16, 2009 at 6:11 am
hoff2
Just look at the similarities, it’s the JEWish scam repeated all over again.
There are 200 states in the world and the JEWish conspiracy is to take control of the 200 states in the world.
American imperialism. NATO imperialism and UN imperialism is all about JEWs taking control of the 200 states in the world. Just look at any action from America, NATO and UN from the JEWs point of view and it all make sense.
September 16, 2009 at 7:35 am
biker68
http://www.dutchnews.nl/news/archives/2009/09/antijewish_chanting_at_footbal.php
check this out HAMAS! HAMAS! LOL!
September 16, 2009 at 8:01 am
Hoff
PC-ism is a JEWish proxy war machine. What do you gain from PC? Nothing, just as you gain nothing from believe in the holohoax.
“Liberal” is JEWish codeword for proxy war machine.
September 16, 2009 at 8:25 am
kerdasi amaq
PC is socially sanctioned bullying.
September 16, 2009 at 8:46 am
Sentinel
Renowned Jew Talmudic scholar admits Rosh Hashana holiday is schizophrenic BS. No wonder Jews are just crazier than a sack full of rabid weasels LOL!!!
http://tzvee.blogspot.com/
September 16, 2009 at 10:36 am
john doe
All country’s involved in Afghanistan and the iraq war, are pretty much steered by Zionist interests. I’m really start wonder who really benefits from Multiculturalism, human rights groups, mass immigration to the west, and hate laws. It’s no surprise who benefits the most, who gets to remain in high political positions, who benefits from the saying that 6 million jews were killed by nationalists? who benfits from the demonization of NAZI’s?. Then you ask your self, who pushed these agenda’s, laws and policy’s. Same people. Do you realize the entire western society have been brainwashed into these wars, they have been brainwashed into this Zionist created western culture. Moral degradation of the west (The west bombing Arabs in Iraq and Afghanistan for the interest of Zionists) homosexuality, bisexuality, mass-immigration, multiculturalism. Zionists wouldn’t have any influence in western politics if multiculturalism, so called human rights groups, immigration policy’s were all rejected by the west. Keep people interested in beer, sex, sports, drugs and meaning less hobbies, and keep the mass’s away from politics, control the media, pumping them with fiction, propaganda and brainwashing. You have a fine example of ruler ship via mass manipulation of a culture.
September 23, 2009 at 6:19 pm
Ehud Barak – Architect of 9-11 « xanabras
[...] Ehud Barak – Architect of 9-11 Bollyn Names Chief Architect of 9/11 [...]
December 2, 2009 at 6:28 pm
kerdasi amaq
“Willie Rodriguez, one of the janitors who worked at the WTC and helped save lives that day, was the last person pulled from the rubble and was even recognized by the president for his actions. Aside from experiencing basement and sub-level explosions on 9/11 before the 1st plane hit, he also stated that he did see the art students in the WTC in an email exchange I had with him.
So why is all this information about an innocent art stunt so important, aside from the fact that these individuals had WTC construction passes in 2000 before releasing their book in August of 2001?…”
For more. look at “more info” at Youtube.
January 3, 2010 at 8:48 pm
SBD TV
These guys didn’t do 9/11
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………26,463
January 27, 2010 at 3:11 pm
Flanders
An 01-10-2010 update which is of interest.
Dancing Israelis: Further Evidence of Foreknowledge
http://wakeupfromyourslumber.com/blog/poseidon/2010/january/10/dancing-israelis-further-evidence-foreknowledge
This update has a fairly comprehensive summary. Scroll down for the summary portion and how it relates to the updated materials.
Another review of documentation which should be reviewed is:
IT WASN’T MUSLIMS
http://www.takeourworldback.com/itwasntmuslims.htm
A related, but less on topic, article tells about, “evidence against related agents and nutcases”.
http://www.takeourworldback.com/brendonoconnell.htm
February 28, 2010 at 8:00 am
gtrman
The Untold Story of the Woolworth Building Incidents on 9-11-01
Additional Important Sightings of the 9-11 Attacks
Quotes Relating to a Missile Firing Off the Roof of the Woolworth Building
never heard this before. Bullshit?
http://www.orbwar.com/woolworth/
February 28, 2010 at 8:33 am
Geronimo
This just in – Obama and Congress extend “Patriot Act”
Obama signs one-year extension of Patriot Act
(AP)
WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama has signed a one-year extension of several provisions in the nation’s main counterterrorism law, the Patriot Act.
Provisions in the measure would have expired on Sunday without Obama’s signature Saturday.
The act, which was adopted in the weeks after the Sept. 11, 2001 terror attacks, expands the government’s ability to monitor Americans in the name of national security.
Three sections of the Patriot Act that stay in force will:
Authorize court-approved roving wiretaps that permit surveillance on multiple phones.
Allow court-approved seizure of records and property in anti-terrorism operations.
Permit surveillance against a so-called lone wolf, a non-U.S. citizen engaged in terrorism who may not be part of a recognized terrorist group.
Obama’s signature comes after the House voted 315 to 97 Thursday to extend the measure.
The Senate also approved the measure, with privacy protections cast aside when Senate Democrats lacked the necessary 60-vote supermajority to pass them. Thrown away were restrictions and greater scrutiny on the government’s authority to spy on Americans and seize their records.
February 28, 2010 at 8:48 am
Biker
CHANGE .. huh Geronimo? LOL! lyin kike – o – nigger. pushing the same policies that the last zio puppet did. more war, more wiretapping, less freedom, WAKE UP!! wake up in your home, or wake up in the American gulag…
June 20, 2010 at 7:57 pm
GTRman
A Little Known Fact About The 9/11 Planes
By Anthony Lawson
6-20-10
Extract: …it would be a remarkable irony, and quite possibly a unique circumstance in the annals of American jurisprudence, if the assumptions used as reasons for launching wars against two sovereign nations, as well as the more generalised ‘War on Terror’ would not stand up as evidence in either a criminal prosecution or a civil damages suit in an American court of law.
It is not a theory but a fact-one that is well known within the 9/11 truth movement-that the 9/11 Commission failed to ensure that at least one of the appropriate government agencies: the NTSB, the FBI or the FAA was commissioned to positively identify the aircraft which were allegedly involved in the murders of nearly 3,000 people, on September 11, 2001.
One does not need to be a Harvard Law School graduate to know that the first and most important requirement in any murder investigation is to determine the cause of death, which often leads to a requirement to identify, and trace to its origins, a murder weapon, or, in the case of 9/11: weapons. And there can be no doubt that each of the four planes which were allegedly hijacked on the morning 9/11 was posited as being a murder weapon, by the U.S. administration and the 9/11 Commission, yet there is absolutely nothing which firmly connects the four allegedly-hijacked planes to any of the 9/11 crash sites.
In fact it is not fanciful to suggest that if a lawyer, even of a far lower calibre than that of an Alan Dershowitz, were engaged to defend the airport security companies that allegedly allowed 19 box-cutter-carrying Arabs to get onto those planes, he would immediately call for the dismissal of such an action on the grounds that the planes which allegedly hit the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center, the Pentagon, and the one which crashed near Shanksville had never been forensically identified as the planes which, allegedly, had been hijacked that morning.
And such a motion could not possibly be denied, as I will explain.
The planes in question were alleged to have been: American Airlines flight 11 (Tail Number: N334AA), North Tower; United Airlines flight 175 (N612UA), South Tower; American Airlines flight 77 (N644AA), the Pentagon, and United Airlines flight 93 (N591UA), which supposedly crashed near Shanksville, Pennsylvania. But the truth is that they could well have been different planes that had arrived on the scenes from quite different locations, because the crash debris recovered from those four crash sites has never been forensically linked to theplanes that allegedly took off from Logan International, Boston; Dulles International, Washington and Newark International, New Jersey, and which were, allegedly, hijacked shortly thereafter. Therefore they cannot possibly be linked, without a reasonable doubt, to breaches of security at those airports.
So, it would be a remarkable irony, and quite possibly a unique circumstance in the annals of American jurisprudence, if the assumptions used as reasons for launching wars against two sovereign nations, as well as the more generalised ‘War on Terror’ would not stand up as evidence in either a criminal prosecution or a civil damages suit in an American court of law.
Air-crash investigations in the United States are normally carried out by the NTSB’s air accident investigation division, and there are several documentary television series featuring this government agency’s painstaking approach when investigating the causes of air crashes. During many such investigations, serial numbers from recovered parts are cross checked with the airline-in-question’s purchase and maintenance records, to try and identify the reason for an accident, when it is suspected that mechanical failure may have been the cause.
However the NTSB has confirmed that-apparently for the first time from its inception, in 1967, since when it has investigated more than 124,000 other aviation accidents-it took no part in investigating any of the air crashes which occurred on September 11, 2001. So the world has been asked to take it on faith and hearsay that the four planes involved were normal scheduled flights which were hijacked by Arab terrorists, some of whom, are, allegedly, still alive.
Even more disturbing is the fact that documentation exists, and is available on the Internet, which indicates that the FBI, backed up by a separate letter from the Justice Department has refused to release any information, under the Freedom of Information Act, about any debris recovered from the crash sites, including the serial number of the “Black Box” Cockpit Flight Data Recorder allegedly found near the alleged crash site of United Airlines Flight 93. It may be recalled that a transcript taken from this recorder formed the basis for several TV dramas and one Academy-Award winning feature film.
By no means finally, but just as disturbing, the core of a jet engine, which can been seen in several 9/11 videos falling out of the northern face of the WTC’s South Tower, and which hit a building on its way down, and was photographed and videoed-in the presence of FBI personnel and at least one FBI vehicle-where it came to rest at the junction of Church and Murray streets, was later photographed, prior to its burial in a land fill on Staten Island. So much for what murder investigators are usually so concerned about: The chain of custody and preservation of important evidence, pending its identification.
The events of 9/11 had consequences far beyond the destruction of life and property in the United States; they were the reasons for the launching of three wars. Yet it is obvious that a leader writer of an influential newspaper, the Washington Post, could not spare the time to look into such a serious matter-one that people with far fewer resources than he or she has access to have managed to do-before launching a scathing attack on a member of the Japanese parliament and the world-wide 9/11 truth movement, in general.
Just because the 9/11 Commission did not do its job properly is no excuse for newspaper writers not to do theirs. Unless, of course, newspapers such as the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, the Washington Post and the Los Angeles Times are playing a conscious role in a conspiracy to prevent the truth about these events from surfacing. In which case their editors and owners would almost certainly be guilty of misprision of felony.
I would like to stress that the identity of the planes is not the only reason why the 9/11 Commission’s findings should be regarded as invalid, and its members found guilty, at the very least, of gross oversights in the collection of the evidence which was used in the writing of its Final Report. Even a cursory look at the visual evidence of the collapsing World Trade Center’s Twin Towers and WTC 7 should have instilled grave doubts about the findings of some of the experts from the National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST.
But, for my money, the real smoking guns were, and still are, the four aircraft that were used as weapons on that terrible day, and for them not to have been identified breaks every rule in any book which seeks to teach the art of solving crimes.
Anthony Lawson
http://www.rense.com/general91/alitt.htm
Engine pictures –
http://www.rense.com/general64/wth.htm