How God and the Tea Party Can Save America

http://www.scribd.com/doc/15914572/IRA-Green-Book-Volumes-1-and-2

The Tea Party movement will never succeed unless it can keep crazies like you away. If it becomes associated with jew-bashing, it is doomed.
Let’s hope that the good people of the Tea Party movement can take the country back from the politicians, and leave you anti-semitic loonies still sitting on the fringe.

The Tea Party is doomed because the you know whos started it and control it. It will not achieve anything worthwhile except as demonstration of how many annoyed people there are in the country and may lead to the awakening of some of them to the truth of who is really in control of their country and that the professional politicians they elect do not have their best interests at heart.

The united States is going the way of the Roman Empire and for exactly the same reasons!

“anti-semitic loonies”, that sounds Jewy to me.

ok, I won’t post here any more.
Some of your points are certainly valid, but most of the message won’t be heard.
The Tea Party is an important movement than can’t afford to be marginalized, which will happen if it becomes anti-jew the way you want it to be.

I know Dick was adopted and the parents name sound Gentile. What ashamed, the Jewboi gets adopted by White parents and still is a raving Jew faggot! Jews and niggers are really alot alike in that they are both ungrateful and worthless.

They’re all gross, except the White ladies who they’re groping and molesting, as usual.

It’s “unavoidable” they tell us. To me, it looks like one more big JEWfest:

http://www.usatoday.com/life/television/news/2010-01-20-sexcov20_CV_N.htm

I’d be willing to bet that ‘tony’ knows JEWS own all of the media, except the internet, where truth is spreading like lightning. That’s why JEWS work so hard to tell us the internet is unreliable, so people will turn to JEW-media for their “news”, thus avoiding the sharing of alternative viewpoints. That’s really not very open-minded of him.

It’s the JEWISH “natural evolution of things”, is what Greenblatt should say.

Nah,

Its the JEWISH “degradation of things.”

Oh yeah, we can put the Jew back in the ghetto….and WE WILL!

While you’re doing that GDL, I’ll be looking for a more permanent solution – one where my great grandchildren don’t have to worry that some liberal ass-wipe wiggertard can undo.

JamesTheJust, I read something years ago about a letter that is in a museum in Rome that was from some Roman official or soldier in the Holy Land, to an official in Rome. Apparently the official in Rome had requested a description of this man called Christ. He described Christ as being lighter in complexion than the people around him at the time of the sighting. As I remember he described him as having dirty blond hair and gray eyes.
As I said, I heard this many years ago, and my recollection may be off a bit. It was in a Christian pamphlet my older brother had.

Oh yeah, we can put the Jew back in the ghetto….and WE WILL!

“While you’re doing that GDL, I’ll be looking for a more permanent solution – one where my great grandchildren don’t have to worry that some liberal ass-wipe wiggertard can undo.”

No doubt JTJ,

The more permanent solution is inevitable. I just like to say different things sometimes to let the Jew know that enough awakened Whites can do what they wish with the hate law creating Jew!

re the SNL vid, cheap humour, i admit I “Lolled” at the “clean-up in aisle 3″ line.

But why the Euro accent? Are they spoofing Euro pop or just having a pop at Germans again?

give them the same options Muslims give.. convert, or DIE

They were already given that option (around 313 AD I believe) under The Law Code of Justinian. Their response was to openly convert and then infiltrate the churches and take power. That’s how we got the Catholic Church today. The Merchants of Venice appointed the POOPS. The most powerful among the merchants was the Dominici family who were demonstrably jewish.

From the moment the jews seized power, they conducted a campaign of mass murder against White Christians and introduced Babylonian paganism.

Prior to that, White Christians were massacred by the Romans under the rule of Nero at the behest of his wife Poppaea. She was clearly of Edomite Jew extraction as noted by Flavius Josephus. Several stages of persecutions ensued and always at the overt or covert direction of the Jews.

According to noted historian Adrian Russell, It was from the Jews, and only from the Jews, that the early Church was to suffer persecution.

If I had my way, there would be no one but pure White Adamic people in the Christian religion today. It is not a good idea to force any Non White Non Adamic person to convert to Christianity.

god and the tea party?? YES

this Asshole? NO!! Gingrich is just as guilty as Clinton, do NOT vote Gingrich!!! two heads… one monster.

3. NAFTA and GATT — In 1993, Gingrich proved himself invaluable to Clinton and the Democrats in Congress when he garnered enough Republican support to pass the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), the precursor for development of an eventual North American Union, following the same trajectory that has occurred in Europe with the emergence of the EU. (See the October 15, 2007 “North American Union” issue of The New American, especially “NAFTA: It’s Not Just About Trade” by Gary Benoit.) The next year he followed suit by supporting the creation of the World Trade Organization (WTO). As Minority Whip, he could have postponed the lame-duck vote on GATT (General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade) that subjected Americans to the WTO. Gingrich’s Benedict Arnold act helped to hand over the power to regulate foreign commerce, a power reserved in the Constitution to Congress alone, to an internationally controlled body, making America’s economic interests entirely at the mercy of the WTO.

Gingrich knew GATT sounded the death knell for American sovereignty. In testimony before the House Ways and Means Committee prior to the lame-duck session, he said, “We need to be honest about the fact that we are transferring from the United States at a practical level significant authority to a new organization…. This is not just another trade agreement. This is adopting something which twice, once in the 1940s and once in the 1950s, the U.S. Congress rejected…. It is a very big transfer of power.”

Painting Post boxes green…A declaration of sovereignty.

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..717

check some of the lib-tard comments also, they mock those that are DOING SOMETHING to effect positive change..sick.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2010-02-05/top-5-misconceptions-about-the-tea-party-movement/

THE EARLIEST “HATE” CRIMINALS

If you can’t guess the people I have in mind, I’ll give you
some clues—clues found in a major world religion that is many
centuries old. I’ll call it Religion X.
Religion X traces its roots back to the First Couple, Adam and
Eve. They were on earth before any other form of worship—before
Islam (appearing 14 centuries ago), before Hinduism or Buddhism
(appearing 25 centuries ago), before even the worship of various
gods in Mesopotamia (60 centuries ago).
Early on, Religion X’ers were told by their God: “Love your
> neighbor—and even the stranger who dwells among you—as much as
> you love yourself.” But it wasn’t long before Religion X began
> rebelling against the laws of the One who had blessed and
> preserved it so much. In response God warned: “All those who hate
> me love death.”
> After centuries of hating their God (which predictably led to
> hatred of fellow humans, God’s creations), Religion X’ers were
> allowed by God to be conquered and transported to ancient Babylon
> where they experienced a 1,600-year-long “vacation.”
> If you haven’t guessed yet, the religion I’m describing is
> Judaism. But don’t stop reading. The
> most shocking stuff is just ahead!
> While in Babylon, the “wise men” among the people began
> formulating new laws which supposedly supplemented and explained
> the time-tested Old Testament writings. But the new rules actually
> contradicted and eventually replaced the original laws!
> The “new and improved” laws are collectively known as the
> Talmud. Even though rabbis are Talmudic experts, probably not one
> Jew in a thousand (and not one non-Jew in ten thousand) knows what
> is in the Talmud. Without further delay, here’s some of the
> Talmud’s “wisdom” (plus sources):
> (I) THE TALMUD HATES SCIENCE:
> Hyenas turn into bats after seven years, and later on turn into
> thorns and demons (Baba Kamma, 16a).
> Being naked in front of a lamp causes epilepsy (Pesahim, 112b).
> There’s medicinal value in dirt found in an outhouse’s shadow,
> also in a white dog’s excrement (Gittin, 69a,b).
> (II) THE TALMUD HATES FEMALES:
> The birth of a girl is an unhappy event (Baba Bathra, 16b).
> It is never good to talk too much to women including one’s own
> wife (Aboth, 1.5).
> All women are “temperamentally light-headed” (Kiddushin, 80b).
> It is okay to divorce your wife if she spoils your food, or if
> you find a more beautiful woman (Gittin, 91a).
> (III) THE TALMUD HATES CHILDREN:
> It is lawful for a girl three years old to have sexual
> intercourse (Abodah Zarah, 37a; Kethuboth, 11b,39a; Sanhedrin,
> 55b,69a,b; Yebamoth, 12a,57b,58a,60b).
> When a man commits sodomy with a boy under nine years of age,
> it “is not deemed as pederasty” (Sanhedrin, 54b,55a).
> Sexual intercourse with a boy under the age of eight is lawful
> since it isn’t fornication (Sanhedrin, 69b).
> (In other words, Religion X became X-rated! Is it any wonder
> that many Jewish persons today are liberally involved with the
> current sexual revolution and are even favorable towards
> legalization of adult-child sex?)
> (IV) THE TALMUD HATES ALL NON-JEWS:
> Since all Gentiles are only animals, all Gentile children are
> bastards (Yebamoth, 98a).
> When a non-Jew robs a Jew, he has to pay him back, but if a Jew
> robs a non-Jew, he doesn’t have to pay him back. Moreover, when a
> Gentile kills a Jew, the Gentile must be killed, but when a Jew
> kills a Gentile, “there is no death penalty” (Sanhedrin, 57a).
> It is okay to “use subterfuges” in a court of law in order to
> cheat a non-Jew (Baba Kamma, 113a).
> (V) THE TALMUD HATES CHRIST AND CHRISTIANS:
> Jesus was born a bastard (Jewish Encyclopedia, “Jesus”;
> Yebamoth, 49b).
> Mary, the mother of Jesus, was a whore and “played the harlot
> with carpenters” (Sanhedrin, 106a,b).
> Jesus “practised sorcery and enticed Israel to apostacy”
> (Sanhedrin, 43a).
> Jesus was punished and sent to Hell where he ended up in
> “boiling hot excrement” (Gittin, 56b,57a).
> Christians will go to Hell “and be punished there for all
> generations” (Rosh Hashanah, 17a).
> Those who read “the works of the Judeo-Christians, i.e., the
> New Testament” will end up in Hell (Sanhedrin, 90a).
> The books of the Christians “may not be saved from a fire, but
> they must be burnt in their place, they and the Divine Names
> occurring in them” (Shabbath, 116a).
> (Now you know what’s been inspiring many of the anti-Christian
> attitudes and actions these days.)
> By roughly 500 A.D. Jewish scribes had completed the voluminous
> Talmud, the written version of what had long been the Jews’ oral
> tradition—the tradition that Jesus condemns in the 23rd chapter
> of Matthew and other parts of the New Testament.
> Whenever anyone claims that for 1500 years the Talmud
> needlessly aggravated Gentiles (who in turn put Jews into ghettos
> and even the Holocaust), Jews can look at even earlier history and
> claim that the “anti-Jewishness” of the New Testament forced Jews
> to hit back with their printed version of the Talmud.
> Actually the New Testament, like a newspaper, merely reflects
> the true condition of Judaism at that time. If someone could prove
> that damaging descriptions of Jews never appeared before the New
> Testament, that would be one thing. But during many centuries
> prior to Jesus or any Christians, Jews were saying and doing the
> same things that we find them still saying and doing during New
> Testament days!
> If the New Testament record of their words and works is
> “anti-Semitic,” is the Old Testament record of the same
> rebelliousness just as “anti-Semitic”?
> A while ago I was talking with a young woman in Los Angeles who
> is training to become a rabbi. I asked her about the Talmud. (She
> seemed shocked I should know so much about it already!) “Oh,” she
> said, “I don’t think it’s as relevant as it once was.” When I told
> her that the “hate” movie “The Last Temptation of Christ” was an
> amazingly accurate reflection of the Talmud—and that more such
> “hate” films are in the works because Hollywood takes the Talmud
> seriously—she had no explanation.
> In the future when “hate” laws are passed, will the incredibly
> hate-filled Talmud and some hate-promoting film studios be swept
> under the rug?

[You are allowed to publish this non-copyrighted article. To avoid the prevalent internet censorship, feel free to change the title to "The Original 'Hate' Criminals" (or Crooks, etc.) or "The Earliest 'Hate' Rebels" (or People, Persons, etc.) or "The History of Hate" (or the Jews, the Hebrews, Judaism, etc.) or any other meaningful title, or no title.]

[Also Google "David Letterman's Hate, Etc."]