THE STATE CREATES ITS OWN ENEMIES
By The Company of Freemen
Goulishly capitalizing on the tragedy of a mass murder, the anti-gun forces are surging forward with their plans for total gun confiscation. If law-abiding private citizens were disarmed, they claim, criminals and crazies would be unable to kill and maim. That’s an obvious lie–criminals, by definition, disobey laws, and madmen can kill with knives, cars, or champagne bottles as easily and as senselessly as they can with guns. The not-so-secret agenda of the State and its apologists is clear: disarm peaceful citizens to render them powerless. Turn law-abiding Americans into criminals with the stroke of a legislative pen. Anyone who refuses to surrender his or her weapons would become an Enemy Of The State, much the same as any armed citizen is right now in the Soviet Union, or Communist China, or Socialist Nicaragua, or Fascist El Salvador, or Monarchist Great Britain. Gun confiscation is non-partisan–it is always and forever aimed at anyone disliked by the current gang in power.
GUN SEIZURE SPARKED 1776 REVOLUTION
The American Revolution began in a dispute over gun control when British Redcoats marched toward Lexington and Concord to disarm farmers there. London claimed to be the “legitimate” government ruling America, just as Washington or Sacremento or Albany claims to be today. And their attempt to disarm us, stems from the same power lust that drove King George. We must, therefore, hold onto our guns–legally or illegally–for the very same reason the colonists did.
Marxist Jews want to find anyway possible to rob patriotic White America of the right to bear arms — they could care less about the “Schwartzes” shooting each other, no matter how much double-talk they spew. [INCOG]
THE TRUTH ABOUT GUN OWNERSHIP
Non-stop Jew propaganda totally ignores the Negro's penchant for violence and attacks OUR rights.
The anti-gunners, certain that the role of government is to grant privileges and dictate behavior, shout that citizens have no reason to be “allowed” to own assault rifles, which have “no legitimate sporting use.” The Constitution, though, says nothing about “a well-regulated sporting club” being necessary. We do not own handguns, assault rifles, shotguns, and other powerful weapons because we are hunters or plinkers or collectors. We do not even own guns because the Constitution “allows” us to. The Constitution does not “grant” rights. It recognizes rights already and irrevocably held forever by the people themselves (individuals), and forbids government from trampling on them. We have a right to keep and bear arms regardless of whether the Second Amendment exists or not! All Article Two guarantees is that we shouldn’t have to defend that right against “our” federal government. We’ve seen that simple guarantee erode, though, haven’t we?
The real reason for gun ownership is to protect the individual from the State, whether it be an invading State from accross the seas or a domestic State grown tyrannical and oppressive. The goal of total, repressive confiscation is clear in the subtle, shifting arguments of the anti-gun forces. When handguns were the target, they clamored prohibition because handguns were not militia-type weapons protected by the Second Amendment. Now they cry for assault rifle bans because “mere citizens” have no business possessing “military-style” weapons!
These eager confiscators rightly point out that assault rifles, handguns, and indeed all “weapons” have only one purpose: to kill. Again they speak a truth, but only partially. The unasked question is, “To kill whom? And under what circumstances?” The answer is, “To kill any who attempt to rob, maim, rape, or kill us.” Even that answer, though, does not fully express the most important reason for gun ownership. Only a small number of people are actually touched by criminal violence. The State, though, touches each and every one of us every hour of every day. People in government seek to tax our earnings to pay for their whims, to draft our children to fight in wars they start, to regulate and interfere with our lives out of pure love of power and their desire to wield it. They have become as tyrannical as any Tory redcoat, Soviet Commissar, or Nazi Gestapo. And they are coming to steal your last line of defense against them. Will you meekly obey?
GUN CONTROL ENFORCED AT GUNPOINT
When any law against guns is passed, how is it backed up? How will the State remove banned weapons from private hands? How will agents of the State disarm the citizenry? Why, by the use of guns, of course! This contradiction has never bothered statists. Why are handguns and assault rifles evil and wicked in the hands of private citizens, yet perfectly fine in the hands of employees of the State? If this is truly “government by the people” why do we see the servants disarming their masters by force? What do they fear from us, if theirs is a legitimate, benevolent government? If the State does not seek to control us, why does it want us disarmed?
The usual answer–stripped of equivocation–is that “mere citizens” are like half-witted children, incapable of safely handling “dangerous” commodities such as weapons or explosives or medicines or information. And only when some half-witted children pass a civil service exam or are elected by other halfwits to work for the wise and benevolent State do they magically become smart and honest and trustworthy enough to carry weapons and decide whom shall be “allowed” to possess guns and what sort of design, shape, or weight such weapons shall be.
Sounds pretty condescending and paternalistic, doesn’t it? That’s how they view us. Sheep for the shearing at tax time, cannon fodder during war time, and dangerous idiots the rest of the time.
And they dare ask us to obey their decrees?
GOVERNMENT CREATES CRIME
What many gun owners refuse to face, usually by saying “it can’t happen in America,” is that the government can and does create new classes of criminals with the mere stroke of a pen. In 1919, Prohibition turns millions of people overnight from sociable drinkers to Enemies Of The State. The victimless crime of ingesting alcohol turned neighborly, peaceful people into fair game for imprisonment, fines, and seizure of property. Some fought back, often with simple shotguns against “revenooers” armed with assault rifles (the Thompson sub-machine gun) in a modern version of the Whiskey Rebellion. The Prohibition amendment created crime by definition. If, tommorow, smoking or drinking coffee or owning a book were declared illegal, the State would suddenly point to a new “criminal underworld” of massive proportions. In the eyes of the State they would become “a new breed of criminal” to be weeded out of society and thrown into prisons. So it is with any prohibition of popular activities, including gun ownership.
GUN PROHIBITION DISARMS THE POOR
Let’s face it–police respond faster to calls from Beverly Hills than they do to calls from Watts. And the rich can afford armed guards, to boot! When so-called Saturday Night Specials are banned, does it affect those who can spend hundreds on a fine pistol? No. Does it prevent criminals from stealing whatever weapon they want or buying it on the black market? No. The only people harmed by a “cheap handgun” ban are the honest poor who have hardly enough money to feed their children, let alone defend them from inner-city marauders. Any form of gun control disarms those least able to defend themselves. And what good is a 15 day waiting period to someone who is threatened by an armed criminal coming by tonight? When one perceives a threat, one should be able to aquire protection immediately.
GUN PROHIBITION IS RACIST
The Gun Control Act of 1968 was rammed down the throats of the American public, blatantly exploiting then-current fears of gun-toting black rioters by implying that the law would help to disarm American Blacks, other minorities, and all dissenters at a time of civil upheaval. to paraphrase a popular slogan, “If the government does not trust minorities with guns, minorities cannot trust government.” Ask any Native American.
In a mirror image case 20 years later, assault rifle bans are being ramrodded through legislatures by appealing to fears that gun-toting white racists are on the loose.
The real and only purpose of gun control is to disarm the innocent and the peaceful, of whatever race, creed, or social status.
GUN PROHIBITION IS SEXIST
The same goes for women. Police and purported feminists urge women to resist rape with fists, fingernails, keyrings, and screams. But why should any woman allow an assailant to get within arms length of her? Why don’t Women’s Rights activists in or out of government reveal the most effective way for a woman to defend herself: to buy a gun and learn to use it? The truth is, they want women to feel weak and perpetually threatened so that they will beg the State for protection. A woman standing proud, armed, and fearless is the last thing most self-proclaimed “feminists” want (since that would undercut their perverse longing for a huge paternalistic government!)
GOVERNMENTS KILL MORE THAN ANY MASS-MURDERER
How can people who work for or worship the State–statists–point to the murder of five children in a schoolyard or twenty people in a restaurant and claim that as sufficient reason to disarm tens of millions of Americans? Are they so presumptuous as to suggest that we are capable of such violent madness? Perhaps there is a degree of psychological projection going on here: statists feel within themselves the urge to kill and project it onto the people they fear the most–us, the victims of the State. For while tens of millions of people own guns, only a minuscule fraction ever use those guns to aggress against others. Every State, however has guns and even more powerful and terrifying weapons in its clutches and every State has used them, will use them, and are using them to murder hundreds, thousands, and millions of innocent, unarmed people.
How can the insane mind of a Patrick Purdy ever dream of matching the death toll of the most minor skirmish in the smallest of wars or “police actions?” The murder of five innocent children is heart-rendingly tragic, but how many thousands of innocent children were roasted in Hiroshima and Nagasaki? How many unarmed, peaceful, young people were slaughtered in Tienanamen Square? How many women, children, and old people have been shot by the bullets of “their own” government in Vietnam, Cambodia, Angola, Nicaragua, El Salvador, India, Israel, Afghanistan, Tibet, Argentina, Libya, Ireland, Russia, South Africa, Chile, Pakistan, Zimbabwe, Iran, and on and on and on for every State you can name, even “our” United States. For statists to use the “mass murder” of a few people as an excuse to disarm Americans when the State is the largest, bloodiest, longest-lived institution of mass-murder in all of history is appallingly hypocritical. Do we owe allegiance to the apologists for such atrocities? NEVER!
Private ownership of weaponry is the last defense against all tyranny, foreign and domestic. The thought that there might come a time when peaceable gun owners (even members of the patriotic NRA) must take arms against an American Li Peng commanding the local police and the US military is anathema to nearly everyone. The possibility, however, must be faced. A lot of American colonists were horrified at the thought of defending themselves against “their” king’s army, too.
CIVILIAN-BASED DEFENSE PREFERED TO STANDING ARMY
Some say that the Constitution “granted” the right to keep and bear arms to provide for a “well-regulated militia.” Since we have a standing army, the argument goes, civilians no longer need to own guns. Yet that amendment was written precisely because the British used that exact argument in their attempts (from 1768 to 1777) to disarm the colonists. Americans detested the standing armies of the British government and knew that civilian-based defense was the ultimate, perhaps the only protection against any threat to liberty, whether from London, Moscow, or Washington, D.C.
DEFYING UNJUST LAWS IS RIGHT AND PROPER!
When the day comes (and it will, if we don’t raise our voices in protest now) that the Imperial State commands its subjects (that’s how they view you and me, regardless of what they say) to turn in our weapons, what will we do? Make no mistake–if people refuse to surrender or destroy their weapons, they will be dealt with by heavily armed police; they will be imprisoned, fined, perhaps even shot if they try to defend their Constitutional–nay, their human–rights.
Of whom should we be more wary — invading troops whose rule we would never sanction, or “our own” government, to which most of us grant some legitimacy and which is right here, right now, all around us? Perhaps paraphrasing a parent’s question will help provide an answer: If the State passed a law telling you to jump off a cliff, would you? No fair answering that “good, pure, sober, honest politicians wouldn’t let that happen.” With guns, it is happening right now.
And when that friendly cop on the beat (whom most gun owners exalt as a good man just doing his job and who may even be a fellow NRA member!) comes around to your house, he will come armed with “good government” handguns and assault rifles. “Sorry pal,” he’ll say, “but the law is the law.”
That possibility is something many gun owners–staunch defenders of law and order and supporters of local police–refuse to face. They blank out the fact that even–perhaps especially–in America, they may have to choose between owning their guns and facing the full implication of the Declaration of Independence, “…that, whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it…”
Some would rather surrender meekly to the State, giving up their last shred of defense against tyranny, rather than face that choice. But if they do surrender their firepower, the choice will have been made. And it won’t matter whether our new masters speak Russian, Chinese, Japanese, English, or American Bureaucratese. They will be our masters nonetheless.
WHAT TO DO
First of all, keep your guns! Do not turn them in just because some law is passed ordering you to do so. That’s just what they want–sheeplike compliance. you are not a criminal. Don’t let the State treat you like one. The colonists who turned in their weapons to their Tory town governments soon learned the folly of their actions. Any government that outlaws gun ownership is an outlaw government! It is no more necessary to obey an oppressive, tyrannical State than it is to obey any thief who demands that you turn over your property under threat of death. We know the free person’s answer to such a demand. So does the State. That is why statists seek to browbeat us into disarming without a fight. They need the sanction of the victim. They cannot hope to disarm us by force. That would tip their hand and guarantee a revolution. But by stealth, instilled guilt, and appeals to our peaceful, law-abiding natures will they attempt to expropriate our only defense against their continued and increasing predations.
Resist the urge to obey the edicts of self-proclaimed rulers. Don’t walk timidly into a concentration camp filled with once-free men and women. Decry with every fiber of your being this trampling of our fundamental human rights!
THE RIGHT TO OWN GUNS IS A CIVIL RIGHT, WITHOUT WHICH ALL OTHER CIVIL RIGHTS ARE IMPOSSIBLE TO DEFEND.
THE RIGHT TO OWN GUNS IS THE RIGHT TO OWN — AND PROTECT — YOUR BODY AND YOUR PROPERTY.
THE RIGHT TO OWN GUNS IS THE RIGHT TO RESIST TYRANNY.
ANY WHO SEIZE GUNS ARE THIEVES OR TYRANTS.
Every law restricting free, immediate access to firearms is a direct attack on individual freedom. The course of action is up to you. Demand the repeal of all such laws or ignore them with impunity. But never accept them as legitimate restraints upon your liberty. Nothing legitimate can issue from the pen of tyrants.
(Permission is explicitly granted to reproduce this article by Xerox®, computer bulletin board, or any other method.)
The Company of Freemen
Distributed by THE FORCE
P.O. Box 94, Long Beach, CA 90801
Donations of postage stamps or money to the above group will help greatly in circulating this article!
FROM GNCARLO:
Senate Bill SB-2099 will require us to put on our 2009 1040 federal tax form all guns that you have or own. It may require fingerprints and a tax of $50 per gun.
This bill was introduced on Feb. 24. This bill will become public knowledge 30 days after it is voted into law. This is an amendment to the Internal Revenue Act of 1986. This means that the Finance Committee can pass this without the Senate voting on it at all.
The full text of the proposed amendment is on the U.S. Senate homepage, http://www.senate.gov/ ” You can find the bill by doing a search by the bill number, SB-2099.
You know who to call; I strongly suggest you do. Please send a copy of this e-mail to every gun owner you know.
http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-h45/text
Congress is now starting on the firearms confiscation bill. If it passes, gun owners will become criminals if you don’t fully comply.
It has started.
Very Important for you to be aware of a new bill HR 45 introduced into the House. This is the Blair Holt Firearm Licensing & Record of Sale Act of 2009.
Even gun shop owners didn’t know about this because the government is trying to fly it under the radar.
To find out about this – go to any government website and type in HR 45 or Google HR 45 Blair Holt Firearm Licensing & Record of Sales Act of 2009. You will get all the information.
TEXT OF HR45: BLAIR-HOLT FIREARM LICENSING ACT
Basically this would make it illegal to own a firearm – any rifle with a clip or ANY pistol unless:
- It is registered
- You are fingerprinted
- You supply a current Driver’s License
- You supply your Social Security #
- You will submit to a physical & mental evaluation at any time of their choosing
- Each update – change or ownership through private or public sale must be reported and costs $25
- Failure to do so you automatically lose the right to own a firearm and are subject up to a year in jail.
- There is a child provision clause on page 16 section 305 stating a child-access provision. Gun must be locked and inaccessible to any child under 18.
- They would have the right to come and inspect that you are storing your gun safely away from accessibility to children and fine is punishable for up to 5 yrs. in prison.
- HR 45 Title VIII exempts all government employees at any level from this act. This is for ANY government employee, even at the state level.
If you think this is a joke – go to the website and take your pick of many options to read this. It is long and lengthy. But, more and more people are becoming aware of this. Pass the word along. Any hunters in your family pass this along.
This is just a “termite” approach to complete confiscation of guns and disarming of our society to the point we have no defense – chip away a little here and there until the goal is accomplished before anyone realizes it.
This is one to act on whether you own a gun or not.
If you take my gun, only the criminal will have one to use against me. HR 45 only makes me/us less safe.
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c111:H.R.45 :
http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-h45/show
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-45
Please… copy and send this out to EVERYONE in the USA , whether you support the Right to Bear Arms or are for gun control. We all should have the right to choose.
38 comments
Comments feed for this article
August 21, 2009 at 8:45 pm
guitarman uk
some good stats in this vid
Gun Control Protects Thieves (Street Criminals & Tyrants)
August 21, 2009 at 8:47 pm
guitarman uk
Gun Control Protects Rapists
August 21, 2009 at 8:48 pm
guitarman uk
link:
August 21, 2009 at 8:56 pm
guitarman uk
Wouldn’t you feel safer with a gun?
British attitudes are supercilious and misguided
“Despite the recent spate of shootings on our streets, we pride ourselves on our strict gun laws. Every time an American gunman goes on a killing spree, we shake our heads in righteous disbelief at our poor benighted colonial cousins. Why is it, even after the Virginia Tech massacre, that Americans still resist calls for more gun controls?
The short answer is that “gun controls” do not work: they are indeed generally perverse in their effects.”
“n Britain, however, the image of violent America remains unassailably entrenched. Never mind the findings of the International Crime Victims Survey (published by the Home Office in 2003), indicating that we now suffer three times the level of violent crime committed in the United States; never mind the doubling of handgun crime in Britain over the past decade, since we banned pistols outright and confiscated all the legal ones. ”
good article from the times
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/guest_contributors/article2409817.ece
August 21, 2009 at 9:53 pm
guitarman uk
not to make light of a serious issue,but i was reminded of these gun-related sketches by genius british satirist,chris morris
gun priests
August 21, 2009 at 9:54 pm
guitarman uk
Fur Q uzzi lover
August 21, 2009 at 9:56 pm
guitarman uk
“Gunishment”
August 21, 2009 at 10:12 pm
guitarman uk
ok, and this one,though not entirely related,just thought readers here would enjoy. please note that the black guy at the end is unaware this is a spoof
Brass Eye – Race and Crime
August 21, 2009 at 10:15 pm
guitarman uk
p.s. sacha cohen owes his career to this man
August 21, 2009 at 10:35 pm
guitarman uk
wow..never seen this one before…
horrorcaust the board game
August 22, 2009 at 3:40 am
Steve in TN
Just ignore the new laws. What are they going to do? Throw 30 million in jail? Just try it.
August 22, 2009 at 4:26 am
kerdasi amaq
August 22, 2009 at 7:36 am
Rifleman Dodd
I will most certainly hand them my firearms….
bullets first.
August 22, 2009 at 8:38 am
American
Something as contentious as Healthcare reform, and we can see how JEWS will do it. SO much for the illusion of bi-partisanship, you’ll take the gov’t option and learn to like it, or else.
Fuck JEWS, it’s not about the left or the right, because JEWS own the system. You’ll do with less, because they want it ALL!
Forget any kind of agreement or concessions, this is how we JEWS are gonna do it (hiding behind Obammy, of course):
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=a9fjicD6YGqk
And if JEW-rats can’t pull it off entirely, at least they can “retire” Obammy. It’s always good for the JEWS, until Gentiles get wise.
August 22, 2009 at 8:40 am
American
JEW/Banker/Criminal? Yep, all of the above:
http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20090821-711684.html
August 22, 2009 at 8:48 am
American
I wonder if Frommer is a JEW?
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,541522,00.html?test=latestnews
Let’s see, did anybody get shot? Nope, so what is his point?
My neck of the woods is a whole lot safer BECAUSE everybody’s packin’. It’s amazing how quiet things stay, when criminals KNOW they’re in the cross-hairs. It’s better for everybody, and that’s a fact, no matter what brainwashed Christians might tell you as they do the JEWS’ bidding.
August 22, 2009 at 8:59 am
American
And like Anna Nicole Smith, we see what happens when you’re wealthy and let JEWS get too close. Of course, FOX news has the article start with the bad Negro doctor, but doesn’t it strike people as odd that Dr. JEW Klein want’s custody of Jacko’s kids?
Come on, I wonder why?
Klein, a Beverly Hills dermatologist, has admitted giving the painkiller Demerol — but not propofol — to Jackson, who suffered from insomnia. Klein has said he found out that Jackson was taking Diprivan, the brand name of propofol, to sleep when he was touring in Germany and warned his longtime friend of the dangers surrounding the intravenous anesthetic.
Last month the Los Angeles coroner issued Klein a subpoena to turn over all of Jackson’s medical records.
Klein also inserted himself into court proceedings related to custody issues involving Jackson’s three children.
In a statement linked to on Klein’s Twitter account earlier this month, his attorney wrote: “Dr. Klein has always had a special relationship with Paris Katherine and Prince Michael, loves and cares deeply for these children and is looking out for their best interest. Dr. Klein has been involved with the children in sharing holidays and other special events and wishes to have the ability to continue his involvement as a very close friend of their father and offers his guidance and protection forever.”
Sure, we see JEWS that wish to care for orphaned Negroes all the time, don’t we?
Full article here:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,540540,00.html
August 22, 2009 at 9:03 am
American
Well, that’s it from me for a few hours. I’m off to another livestock auction to see if somebody has something to say about the economy, bankers, or politicians. From there, I’m compelled to mention that all three are JEWS, and that our good White boys (they come from around here), are NOT fighting for us, but Israel.
Lots to talk about! I also understand that Adam Austin has a new book out, which I intend to get soon, and perhaps I’ll start handing those out, too.
Keep spreading the word. JEWS are powerless, unless Goyim stay blindfolded.
August 22, 2009 at 10:27 am
White Master
Gun control means using two hands!
August 22, 2009 at 10:46 am
Greg Bacon
Any time someone starts blabbering that only ‘militias’ can legally own guns, ask them if the word ‘people’ in the 2nd Amendment is different from the same word in the 1st.
We the People created the federal government to PROTECT out rights, not take them away.
It wasn’t a mistake that after the 1st Amendment that enshrined our rights to freedom of speech, press, assembly and religion that the next amendment stated specifically that We the People had the right to own guns.
They knew damn good and well there would come a time when we would need those guns.
August 22, 2009 at 10:58 am
White Master
I talk with more and more people who say they are getting more guns, not giving them up! What can we say, we INTELLIGENT White Americans have a desire for freedom running through our veins!
August 22, 2009 at 11:05 am
White Master
Hey Incog,
Maybe the Jews will soon send their “useful idiot” ARA mobs to our houses, to take our guns. Wouldn’t that be fun? LMAO!
August 22, 2009 at 12:13 pm
kerdasi amaq
It’s pretty obvious what their strategy is. Make possession of firearms so onerous; that people will give them up, to avoid the legal hassle. They are also trying to create a legal minefield for gun-owners.
Yeah, freedom to protect yourself from your enemies. From those who think that everything you own: really belongs to them. Watch out America, if they get your guns: you will be de-kulakized!
August 22, 2009 at 12:15 pm
Radio K.A.O.S.
Calling out from the badlands
August 22, 2009 at 12:50 pm
kerdasi amaq
“that friendly cop on the beat (whom most gun owners exalt as a good man just doing his job and who may even be a fellow NRA member!) comes around to your house, he will come armed with “good government” handguns and assault rifles. “Sorry pal,” he’ll say, “but the law is the law.””
No HONEST or patriotic American would ever do this. They would RESIGN immediately; rather than ENFORCE such a law!
August 22, 2009 at 9:30 pm
Northerntruthseeker
Canada is zionist occupied territory, and part of the reason is because we the citizens cannot own guns without a government gun registry, and a government license!
Let that be a warning to America… NEVER surrender your guns, and never have them attempt to have you “register” your weapons!
The right to bare arms is in place to make sure that the US government never gets to the point of corruption that they enslave the people. The guns are there to protect YOUR rights and freedoms!
August 23, 2009 at 12:30 am
Marshall
New Hampshire isn’t far from Canada NorthernTruthSeeker, and they can legally tote guns around in public whenever they want to. Curiously, they have an extremely low crime rate as well.
Is there a statistical relationship there? Hmm, I wonder.
Conversely, Washington DC has a complete firearms ban and yet they have the highest murder rate in the USA. Go figure.
What’s the difference between DC and New Hampshire? Cause and effect…just use common sense and the solution will present itself, won’t it?
Marsh
August 23, 2009 at 2:42 pm
kerdasi amaq
August 24, 2009 at 12:27 am
John
You’re all paranoid freaks with too much time on your hands.
And a part of the greater problem. You whites are not special, and every ethnicity is equal. One day, everyone will be mixed, as one world, united, and this is utopia. The problem is when people who refuse to evolve, like yourselves, cause hysteria.
Chill the hell out, man. Enjoy life a little.
—-
WARNING! Jew Spew detectors are registering high on the above line of bull. Please consider carefully before swallowing.
August 24, 2009 at 2:02 am
Anonymous
“The problem is when people who refuse to evolve, like yourselves, cause hysteria. “
right…whites should mix with inferior races to EVOLVE? LOL!
Every damned mamzer I’ve seen from a mixed white + ??? has always DEVOLED. And that’s a fact.
Keep your little mind-numbed utopia to yourself.
August 25, 2009 at 8:00 pm
subvertednation
Hey American, just noticed you mentioned my new book “Subverted Nation’s Basic Training for Revolutionaries”!
First, I have to say this article from the Freemen is, in all honesty, hands down, one of the best articles I’ve seen on gun rights yet. In fact, I may reproduce this at my site as well, so that more people are sure to see it.
About the book. Have you ever wished you could simply put something in a person’s hand, and have it enlighten them to the jew FOR YOU?!? Don’t you often wish you had something ON HAND to destroy the arguments of your critics, when trying to enlighten them about the jew? Or, maybe you have looked for a way to get these so-called “truthers” to “wake up” THEMSELVES, because they are still clueless about the jews destroying our country? Then you NEED MY BOOK. It was designed SPECIFICALLY for this purpose. Available in HARD BACK it is both PHYSICALLY and HISTORICALLY solid. You will BLOW THEIR MINDS with the truth about history, and our place in the world today, with words DIRECTLY from the horse’s mouth! This book will either turn them into REAL revolutionaries and patriots, or their facade will be washed away, and they will turn into whimpering piles of mush; but they will NEVER argue you on this point again.
Forgive the shameless plug, but this thing needs to get spread around. You need something SOLID in the REAL WORLD that you can put in somebody’s hands and make them recognize. No more need to reference an “internets” article that they may not believe, because we all know the “internets” are full of lies, and you can’t trust those blogs!
If the book doesn’t work like I said, you can BEAT THEM OVER THE HEAD with it, and I guarantee they’ll listen!
http://www.subvertednation.net
August 29, 2009 at 6:22 am
truth
george washington was a freemasonic scumbag.
September 5, 2009 at 9:17 am
Bleda
Being not American, i support right of people having guns. I can’t even get the point of saying it shouldn’t be allowed. But i am certain some psychological tests and IQ tests (or certain education) should be taken, because there’s some people who would shot their neighbor’s dog just because it gets in their garden or simply can’t control their temper under pressure…
October 13, 2009 at 8:42 pm
Commander McBragg
Registration is always followed by confiscation
NEVER register your arms, and NEVER surrender them. The moment you do, YOU ARE A SLAVE
Organize locally into dependable squads for the coming battle, and TAKE IT TO THEM once they start the final tyranny. Get plenty of ammo, magazines and BUY BODY ARMOR and a kevlar helmet if you can afford it, NOW
October 13, 2009 at 8:56 pm
Commander McBragg
BTW the 2nd Amendment says : “ARMS”… that is ANY weapon, not merely firearms !!
The Founders wanted us armed EQUALLY with any standing army.. so anything the standing army has, we have a GOD GIVEN right to own and train with
November 15, 2009 at 4:05 pm
kerdasi amaq
November 15, 2009 at 4:10 pm
kerdasi amaq
“…our refusal to bow to any order, but our own, any institution, but our own…”
****************************************************
“while England explains the futility of force by others; it is the only argument to which she listens…”
November 15, 2009 at 4:20 pm
Marshall
George Washington got a demit from the lodge when he discovered it had been infiltrated by Illuminati. Ben Franklin on the other hand was heavily into all things Masonic, and even joined the “Hellfire Club” in Europe.