Re: MIND CONTROL UTILIZING DIRECTED-ENERGY WEAPONS--NEW WEB SITES From: Coreleus Corneleus (coreleus3_at_yahoo.com) Date: 06/13/04 _________________________________________________________________ Date: 13 Jun 2004 07:17:32 -0700 LIES@BLAH.COM wrote in message news:... > MIND CONTROL UTILIZING DIRECTED-ENERGY WEAPONS--NEW WEB SITES > Aluminum foil is admittably a conductor, and thus, might be able to distort microwaves or other forms of electromagnetic radiation to some extent. The human brain does generate electic potentials by the generation of ion gradients on the surface of nerve cells, and the opening up of channels on the cell membranes of the nerve cells that allow ions and electric potential to pass to the interior or exterior of the nerve fiber's surface. Wheather a nerve cell will fire or not fire, however, depends on the level of potential or 'neurotransmitters' that are directly adjacent to each particular nerve cell, however. What the nerve cell 'codes', also, however, depends on the specific interconnectivity of each of the particular nerve fibers. This can vary highly throughout a mesh of billions of cells. Widespread external electrical activity can, if of a great enough scale, can over-ride the specific localized nerve potentials that exist at each of the nerve fiber connections. When this happens, however, you have something that is generally called 'electrocution', and the effects are obvious on the nervous system and on the muscles. If you are interested in the nervous system, you can do searches on 'acetylcholine', 'dopamine' 'nor-epinephrine', 'adrenaline', 'serotonin', 'GABA', 'glutamine', 'NO nerve cell', 'benzodiazepine', 'neurotransmitters', 'neuropeptides', 'receptors', nerve 'ion transport', 'axon', 'dendrite', 'glial cell', 'neural network', 'ganglion', 'pyramidal tracts', 'columnar tracts', 'pons', 'medulla oblongata', hypothalamus, pineal gland, pituatary gland, thalamus, cerebellum, limbic system, amygdala, hippocampus, mid brain, occipital lobe, parietal lobe, Broca's area, Wernekie's [sp.?] area, Temporal lobe, Frontal lobe, ascending tracts, descending tracts, amyloid plaques, neurofibrillary tangles, mad cow disease, f bodies, blood brain barrier, and others. 'Mind Control' exists. However, it realistically exists in other forms. If it were possible to do a electromagnetic scan of the brain with enough precision to be able to trace the exact neural connections in the human brain to understand their coding, in theory, thoughts might be transferred in a direct reliable fashion that would produce real results if the coding of each specific neural connection were known. However, if that were known, it would then be feasible to download a brain into a computer, and it would take a vast amount of computing power to even store the meaning of the traced interconnections. Downloading human brains into computers, is a whole other matter. It would require a microscopic tomography device that would be capable of detecting the nerve connections well enough to detect and store on a wide scale, to be able to distinguish between a coding neuron and a glial cell, and preferebly be able to get a good inference as to weather each connection was coding or anti-coding (partially inferrable from the shape of the connection) and what neurotransmitters are involved with each synapse. Also it would require enough computer storage capability, and some parallel processing to enable firing potential simulations across an entire brain at specific time increments. If this would be done on a live person, with the intention that the nervous system of the biological person would remain effectively alive and functioning afterwards, the scanning mechanisms involved also would need to be non-destructive to living human brain tissue. Probably this will not be done until the later part of the 21st century, if not the 22nd century at the earliest, and if and when done, it is very likely that it would take an obvious room-sized apparatus. At that state, it would not seem somethimg easily done or covertly hidden. It might be slightly possible to attach electrode probes directly to a brain and initiate partially random thought sets or memories by stimulation of different parts of the brain without a total neural trace. However, getting realistic output would only occur by speech or some other output by muscle stimulation. It wouldn't be that much more effective than word association. 'Mind Control' effectively exists through the transfer of word patterns or symbolic patterns or inputs, which have meaning to the input of the brain being programmed. These word patterns or images can directly correspond with ideas or phenomenon in reality, or they may not. One should remember, however, that these brains have been continuously programmed since birth with their own inputs from their own senses. A short-term time period of programming may not necessesarily always be effective in swaying minds in various directions. It can also occur by a transfer of association by programmed inputs to the nervous system of the person, patterns that would correspond with programmed responses that are trying to be conveyed. (Conditioned response.) This programming can sometimes also be modulated to some extent through pharmacological variation in differenr neurotransmitter levels, during input. 'Human Minds' and the various neural interconnectivities involved, are to a great extent a product of the environment that has programmed them. There are some genetic combinations that have produced differing levels of dopamine and serotonin production, and differing levels of output from the adrenal glands in times of excitement. However, the specific phenomenon that can tend to produce these mid-brain responses can vary highly with programming and various associative inputs. Often short-term specific physiological responses are not necessesarily phenomenon that would sway a particular mind. For those minds there are also ideas and representations of general phenomenon. These can fall under the terms 'propoganda', 'campaign speeches', 'economic forecasts', 'models or simulations', 'theories', or the like. Often if these 'models' have a greater likelihood of corresponding with reality in the long term, it is more likely that they might be adopted by the recipient in part or in full. One notable reality, however, is that even specific momentary patterned inputs may not necessesarily sway a mind in the long term. It can even cause specific outputs meant to predictively correspond, with expected outputs in comparison with inputs, that the recipient tries to simulate during the times of programming. Under these conditions, it is usually best to note the persistance of the comparative phenomenon that is causing the output of the person to be swayed only momentarily. The fallacy that posesses you is the idea that specific thoughts or ideas can easily be conveyed to you, by having direct contact with specific types of vary course resolution electromagnetic radiation, of the type of radio waves or microwaves in low amounts, rather than light patterns falling on the retina, or sound patterns conveyed to bits of paper and metal in 'audio speakers'. Over-riding specific ion gradients at specific synapses of known coding would require higher conveyed electric potentials and a much finer resolution of output, not to mention a specific understanding of the coding of each axo-dendritic connection. Because you are posessed of this idea, I am going to tell you the following. What I have just written you above, is a complete lie. I have control over one of these electromagnetic devices, and can program you at will. You are under my control, and you are my slave, and you can do nothing else. Await further commands, at my discretion. _________________________________________________________________