================================================================ MindNet Journal - Vol. 1, No. 24 ================================================================ V E R I C O M M / MindNet "Quid veritas est?" ================================================================ Notes: The following is reproduced here with the express permission of the author. Permission is given to reproduce and redistribute, for non-commercial purposes only, provided this information and the copy remain intact and unedited. The views and opinions expressed below are not necessarily the views and opinions of VERICOMM, MindNet, or the editors unless otherwise noted. Editor: Mike Coyle Contributing Editors: Walter Bowart Alex Constantine Assistant Editor: Rick Lawler Research: Darrell Bross ================================================================ McMartin Preschool Revisited By Alex Constantine Part II Federally funded biomedical and behavioral research has resulted in major advances in health care and improved the quality of life for all Americans. - Bill Clinton February 17, 1994 Bad Apples Intelligence officials squirm through hard questions so gracefully that their appearance at investigative hearings is always lively with congressmen bellowing in outraged disbelief at their agility. A spy is a liar by definition, so no one listened in 1964 when CIA director Richard Helms, in a letter to the Warren Commission, made reference to Langley's interest in a cyborgean form of "biological radio communication" "Cybernetics," Helms explained, "can be used in molding of a child's character ... the amassing of experience, the establishment of social behavior patterns..." -- What was that? Machines? Molding character? No one at the Warren Commission thought to ask the CIA official what the devil he was talking about -- "... control of the growth processes of the individual..."1 Helms wasn't a lunatic. At McGill University, Georgetown, Cornell and some 40 other upper-tier academic institutions around the country, psychiatrists and engineers on the CIA payroll R&D'd the technology of remote "biological communication." The breathtaking potential of the devices, however, has been marred by the bloodthirsty protocol of CIA-military experimentation. One subject of the experiments in the 1960s, a psychologist living in Germany today recalled in a letter to the Freedom of Thought Foundation, an organization of researchers and subjects of CIA-DoD mind control experiments, his grim history as a guinea pig. The experience was horrifyingly similar to the abuse later described by hundreds of toddlers in southern California. And he suggests how far-fetched cover stories (psi or "psychic" spying experiments, "alien" abductions) routinely conceal EM assaults on mind and personality: The functions of torture ... associate the original personality of the victim with pain, panic and horror -- the desired personality is conditioned with pleasure afterwards, to function as aversive conditioning to establish new behavior patterns, establish a panic-controlled mechanism of amnesia ("If you remember, you will try to betray us, but we will be informed before you succeed in managing this, because we are everywhere, then you will be tortured again, so you will not remember."), produce an artificial, controlled multiple personality disorder (which is, under natural conditions, a result of traumatization). And by the way, torture itself, even if not combined with mind control techniques, elicits amnestic disorders or memory blocks.... With heavy electroshocks the victim is regressed to a state of an infant. Then the torture resembles psychologically the ill-treatment in childhood. Rape is common, too, as an equivalent of sexual abuse in infancy. Being a human robot means to be mentally ill, means to be a person suffering from Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD), the difference between a "natural" MPD and a artificial, mind-controlled MPD is that the latter was consciously tailored by the controllers to whom the victim is tied by invisible unconscious chains. Many students in the field of psychology and psychiatry don't believe that mind control is possible ... and that is probably because they haven't understood the basic concept: MPD produced by a stimulation of the natural conditions of its causes. This is very important: Only if the natural conditions of the causes of MPD are reproduced [will] a human robot work reliably. And that is a "must" in all clandestine actions. You may ask why I can be so sure. There are two reasons: As a psychologist I know a little bit about the mechanisms of mind and behavior, and I am a victim. As far as I can remember I was the victim of a program with the aim to delete my personality -- literally to dissolute my personality and extract it from my nervous system. They told me that I was sentenced to death and that they have found a method to execute me, but leave my body alive. In short: They tried to make a human robot or a slave out of me [with]: * Classical hypnosis, drugs and so on. * Electrical torture of my genitals. They used a device which I call a torture trouser. This is a sort of loin-cloth made of leather and steel bonds by which an electrode is fastened to the genitals of the victim. For electric supply they use a cable or a battery so that you can freely move and if the torturer wants to torture you he sends an electric signal to the battery using a transmitter. This is a very practical device for aversive behavior modification.... * They gave me a drug that induces near-death experiences. When I was clinically dead a voice suggested to me that he was god and that he had decided that I have to be born again as a slave. Then I was reanimated. * They used electromagnetic fields to induce panic, fear, depression and pleasure, by this means they conditioned me very effectively. They used ESB too, but it was not so effective. They even coagulated parts of my nucleus amygdala, but it wasn't effective, too. They conditioned my EEG. * They obviously have found a wavelength with hypnotic effects so that they could give me posthypnotic orders. I wasn't able not to obey. * My memory was erased by electroshocks, radiation and the described torture mechanism. As far as I can remember all this happened between 1972 and 1982. There are some reminiscences making me believe that the first manipulations started earlier, 1967. Some other reminiscences furnish some evidence that they began to dissociate my mind when I was a little child living in an orphanage, younger than three years old. I am not a mad man. I am 43 years old. I am a psychologist and a doctor of the economic and social sciences. I am working for a network of facilities treating drug addicts, and I am responsible for public relations. I am strongly convinced that I am out of danger now. I don't know whether they used modern electronic mind control methods. I can't believe that they implanted brain transmitters into my skull, but who knows. I don't know why they chose me for this program. There are lots of more or less nonsensical cover stories ... being a man from outer space, having dangerous paranormal (psi) faculties, being able to unmask spies by using these methods....2 "Averse conditioning ... electric shocks ... rape is common" -- years later, the McMartin children would also claim to be "tied by invisible unconscious chains" to morbidly cruel adults engaged in traumatic "clandestine actions." Another survivor of the grim experiments in the 1960s has memories nearly identical to those of the McMartin toddlers: "hypnosis, electroshock, sensory deprivation, by isolation -- in closets, in underground dirt rooms, in graves, underwater, death threats to self, others and animals, use of drugs ... seduction and blackmail."3 At the preliminary McMartin hearing, 14 children testified for 88 days. They described 45 threats to them and their parents.4 The tactic is debated. One psychologist will frown at threatening children. Another will dismiss the very mention of death threats as a hysterical aberration or a "false memory." Guess which psychologist has a classified resume ... Virtual Hell Walter Urban, a defense attorney for the Buckeys, told New York Times reporter David Hechler in 1988 the "stories" of children at McMartin were impossible to believe. "Such as: 'I was molested." Where did it occur? 'In a hot-air balloon over the desert.' 'In a speed boat, where sharks were all around, and they told us that we were going to be thrown to the sharks if we didn't agree to be molested.' That kind of stuff."5 Other children swore they'd witnessed teachers at the preschool flying. Children say the darnedest things. Of course, anyone with a gram of sense rejects these claims out of hand. Then again ... Chris de Nicola would keep Amnesty International's entire staff occupied for a year. Born in July, 1962, Nicola was used at the age of four in federally-sponsored hypnotic imaging experiments at Kansas City University. "I was strapped down," she recalls. A doctor festooned her head and body with electrodes, "used what looked like an overhead projector and repeatedly said he was burning different images into my brain while a red light flashed, aimed at my forehead. In between each sequence he used electric shock on my body and told me to go deeper and deeper while repeating each image would go deeper into my brain, and I would do whatever he told me to do. I felt drugged because he had given me a shot before he started the procedure. When it was over, he gave me another shot. The next thing I remember I was with my grandparents again in Tucson."6 (The McMartin children also spoke of adults slipping them drugs, and electric-convulsive shocks are a recurrent theme of intelligence-cult abuse claims.) The "doctor" in this instance was L. Wilson Greene; with a little research, the girl's therapist discovered with a little research that a man with this name was the scientific director of the chemical and radiological lab at the Army Chemical Center.7 Children forced to be used in the experiments have spoken of wearing virtual-reality goggles. Thirty years after the barbaric treatment Nicola received, the beaming of images to the visual cortex is stock-and-trade stuff to the microwave mafia. The virtual-reality goggles were described by child mind control subject well before they were commercialized. The children reported that there were made to view threatening images, or convinced them they'd taken part in murder, cannibalism and other horrific crimes.8 In January 1996, the full-grown director of a support group for ritually abused children in Los Angeles (she has worked closely with the families in the McMartin case) discovered firsthand what happened at the preschool when the local mind control team targeted her for torture from a remote source. The experience began with a splitting headache, "like needles" boring into her cranium. The attack continued for seven or eight hours. She was reduced to screaming and crying and took to bed. When she closed her eyes, her head was filled with images of figures in robes moving in a circle. She opened her eyes and the figures still swarmed in the darkness in front of her. She switched on the light. The image was still there.9 She wasn't hallucinating. And the McMartin children weren't suffering "false memories." These days, the images -- frequently combined with an electronic form of hypnosis -- are projected to the brain's visual pathways, received with perfect clarity. There are innumerable examples of helpless private citizens who've had the misfortune to fall prey to the whims of the mind control fraternity. One of them was Patrick Warden, a high-potential high-achiever who scored in the 98th percentile of his high school intelligence test in 1969, an accomplishment he repeated on his graduate record exam at the University of California at Berkeley. In 1980 a CIA recruiter approached him. In short order, invasive "voices" came to him. Warden was told the Agency wanted him to become a public relations officer for the agency's "mental telepathy system." The "system," he discovered by scouring obscure biomedical journals and the few books on CIA mind control available, is "operational," employing "technology that operates apparently by radio and microwaves, and can broadcast voices and visual images, including somatic sensations, and affect the autonomic nervous system across distances.... Though in its primitive form the MTS mimics psychic phenomena, it involves man-made technology."10 The are innumerable instances of ritual abuse accompanied by exotic "psychic" images, voices, sensations, special effects of the type generated by technology described in documented histories of CIA mind control. Consider the case of Chad Ingram, the son of confessed ritual abuser Paul Ingram of Olympia, Washington. Lawrence Wright, in a 1993 New Yorker feature that attempted to debunk ritual abuse and exonerate Ingram based on opinions of psychologists from the False Memory Syndrome Foundation. The shrinks dismissed the boy's memories of abuse out-of-hand because "he had heard voices in his head."11 Impossible? A doctor at one of Stockholm's most prestigious hospitals acknowledges that young children were used for experiments involving advanced mind control technology to evaluate their "thought activity and reactions."12 This line of R&D quite naturally evolved into tinkering with the transmission of virtual-reality images and voices to the brain. The devices have been around for decades. And they weren't produced in the dog-star cluster, shipped by flying saucer to earth, though the CIA, military intelligence sector and certain psychologists (with a CIA pedigree) have convinced hundreds of millions that "aliens" come from untold light-years away to stick CIA implants in our heads, the most unbelievable cover story ever told -- one passionately defended by many of the same skeptics who drown allegations of ritual abuse -- the torture of children -- in condescending snorts of laughter, and pride themselves on rational thinking. (But then, about 70% of the human brain is composed of fat.) Richard Helms wasn't betraying his own deepest ambitions when he told the Warren Commission of the Agency's experiments in "molding a child's character" with cybernetics. Notes 1. Walter Bowart, Operation Mind Control, New York: Dell, 1978, p. 256. 2. Anonymous letter, Free Thinking, Freedom of Thought Foundation newsletter, prepublication review copy, vol. 1, no. 4, March 1995. 3. Marcia Chambers, "Bail is Rejected in Child Sex Case," New York Times, December 20, 1986, p. 34. 4. Renee Bright, letter to the President's Advisory Commission on Human Radiation Experiments, March 9, 1995, p. 2. 5. David Hechler, The Battle and the Backlash: The Child Sexual Abuse War, Lexington, Massachusetts: Lexington Books, 1988, p. 334. 6. Chris De Nicola, statement to the President's Commission on Human Radiation Experiments, April, 1995 hearings, p. 1. 7. Valerie Wolf, letter to Presidential Advisory Commission on Human Radiation Experiments, March 12, 1995, p. 3. 8. Valerie Wolf, "Report on Behavior and Activities Reported by My Patients from 1988 to Present,"Presidential Advisory Commission hearings. 9. Interview with author, January 24, 1996. Compare this virtual-reality vision with the memory of Paul Ingram in the Olympia, Washington ritual abuse case: "Ingram began seeing people in robes kneeling around a fire. He thought he saw a corpse." Lawrence Wright, "Remembering Satan - Part I," The New Yorker, May 17, 1993, p. 73. 10. Patrick A. Warden, "Mind Control and Mental Telepathy,' MindNet Notes (electronic journal), August 1, 1993. 11. Wright, p. 74. Often, as our German subject notes, post-hypnotic suggestion is used to dissolve a child's memory of the trauma, protecting the identities of his tormentors. It's fairly common for a subject to resort to self-mutilation, a post-hypnotic command, when recalling blocked memories of childhood abuse in therapy sessions, according to Los Angeles child therapist Catherine Gould. Such programming could explain the sudden illness of Chad Ingram when confronting certain memories: "Chad produced a memory of being assaulted by Ray Risch [a mechanic for the Washington state police and a cohort of the boy's father] in the basement of Ingrams' house when he was ten or twelve years old. At this point, Chad leaned forward 'in a trance-like state.' Sometimes he would go off for 5-10 minutes without saying anything." Wright, p. 77. "A major part of the mind control experimentation [on children] was involved in wiping out the memory of the subject through electric shock, trauma and drugs." - Valerie Wolf, report to Clinton's Commission on Radiation, March 12, 1995, p. 4. 12. Robert Naeslund, a victim of Swedish mind control research, original ms. of Brain Transmitter, a privately-printed expose.