POLICE WHO KNOW INFORMATION - Log started Feb. 11, 2006 Rev: November 16, 2007 |----------------------------------------------------| | TO POLICE OFFICERS: As you can see here, your | | colleagues are finally telling the truth. Please | | join them in letting the world know about this | | decades-old crime. Anonymity is guaranteed if | | you contact me, Eleanor White, with your story. | | ewraven1@sympatico.ca | |----------------------------------------------------| The first instance where a police officer admitted to knowing that harassment is happening is from a lady who uses the code name "anymouse". She and her family moved into a house which, unknown to them, was a former methamphetamine lab. The trace chemicals caused her family to have severely decayed teeth, to the point where their dentist accused them of being "meth users." Someone, probably the dentist (some dentists are required to report possible drug user symptoms) then turned the family over to a harassment group who harassed them for years. Only after finding out about the "meth mouth" mandatory reporting laws, and informing local law enforcement that they were NOT meth users (a difficult task) was she able to get the harassment (almost) stopped. No doubt, there are MANY other people who have been falsely reported by medical personnel as meth users, and don't have the slightest idea why they are being brutally harassed. This is an important human rights issue which needs to be exposed and stopped! ------- Forwarded message follows ------- From: eleanor@raven1.net Subject: Nice backup for us, from a police officer Date sent: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 All emails like this one should be approached with a degree of skepticism, however, I find nothing in the content to suggest this isn't a bona fide email. I do find encouragement that if this is a real police officer, we do have at least some friends in blue: =================================================== Dear Eleanor, I stumbled across your site only a matter of days ago and I'm afraid to say that the information has confirmed a number of facts that I had always suspected to be the case. Throughout recent years we have often ... [Eleanor talking: Note the word "OFTEN"] ... been called in to cases where a victim suspects that he/she is being stalked by a large gang, and sometimes has some form of photographic evidence to back this up. However, our superiors informed us that they had strict orders (from where they were unsure) that we were to ignore all cases of gang stalking and, if possible, to provide evidence that the victim is criminally insane. From my investigation in recent days it has become clear that: - Victims are often people living on their own. This is because it is a lot easier to marginalize a victim who has no direct relatives to support them. It is also very useful for the perpretrators, since the single person can be classed as mentally ill and there will be absolutely no evidence to prove that this is not the case. - The criminal justice system is strictly under the control of a small elite who ensure that no charges are pressed against the instigators of the gang-stalking. I will continue to look into the matter in the forthcoming weeks; I get the feeling that perhaps in the Christmas period we may see a surge in attacks. I will endeavor to keep you informed as long as I am not silenced. Thank you for being an upstanding defender of the truth. When justice is done you will be recognized as a pioneer of their downfall. Xxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxx ================================================ Added on Feb 11/06 (code SN): Well, today, I received a questionnaire form from a target in the same geographical area as the officer, and listen to what she reports about her attempts to get help from the police: >I have been personally told by police not involved in >the situation that people within higher departments >WILL NOT ALLOW them to assist me. Added on Feb 11/06 (code CV): In response to yesterday's report of a second police officer explicitly stating they had ORDERS to not help a target of vigilante/group/gang stalking, one of our forum members reports this THIRD instance below: "First they assigned the case to a third shift patrol officer - Officer Xxxxxx - who had no computer background and was on vacation. When he returned he told me he couldn't help and he was told to not even enter a record of the complaint into the police computer BY HIGHER UPS." Until we had these three reports, the first being in Nov. 2005, our group of targets of vigilante stalking were largely only able to allege these crimes. These three reports change the entire complexion of the situation. Orders from the top makes it very plain this is a major political agenda, and functionally, it's really not much different from Hitler's/Stalin's neighbourhood civilian thugs who keep citizens "toeing the line." Added on Feb 11/06 (code HG): A FOURTH report showing police acknowledgement of vigilante/group/gang stalking: >In the beginning of my [criminal harassment] in 2000, when >I went to the police station in Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx XX, the police >told me that "they were doing this type of thing to someone in >every apartment building in the city". Added on Feb 12/06 (code FKA): >Please don't use my name, but when I went to the FBI in 1996 >and met with the Special Agent in Charge, he immediately said >"military". > >There was no pretending that this wasn't going on (and going >on a lot). He referred our case to the Portland FBI who >ordered an investigation. Of course that investigation would >be sent to Sacramento where the FBI there refused to investigate. > >Every other law enforcement agency were made to stop >investigating. None of the agents pretended there was "nothing >going on." They just looked beaten down and said "I'm sorry". Added on Feb 13/06 (code _S): >2004, small mid-western town, victim remote shocked while >driving her car on main street. > >On reporting incident to police, officer admitted that remote >shocking can and does happen but refused to make a report and >referred victim BACK TO HER HOMETOWN POLICE. Eleanor White commenting: "BACK TO HER HOMETOWN POLICE?" Does this suggest that local police are initiating targeting of some people they "can't get justice" for via the courts? Added on Feb 14/06 (code ZR): >Eleanor, I went to the sheriff's office in the county in >Xxxxx where I believe the gangstalk "higher ups" reside. >I called and e-mailed a detective in criminal intelligence >who was working with another target who resided in that >county (next to mine). I also mailed this detective a >copy of David Lawson's report ("Terrorist Stalking in >America") and Norma's [gangstalking] CD. He emailed me back >and said that the volume of information that I and this >other target were sending him was too much. > >I then called him -- he said to go to MY local police--I >asked him if he was aware of where the gangstalking was >originating from (in his county) he replied "yes." I >hope he is aware of and working on this now in that >county. These people are also heavily into selling drugs >and claim to be professional murderers. Added on Feb 16/06: This is a quote from private investigator David Lawson's 2001 book titled "Terrorist Stalking in America", a review of which can be read here: http://www.shoestringradio.net/terstalk.htm "I also spoke with police officers from across the country. They confirmed the existence of stalking groups across the country. In general, they said that "cause stalking" is primarily a civil problem where the plaintiff has to prove financial loss. They also said that there are free speech and grass roots issues involved. In fact, the police themselves are targets of these groups. In small towns, the number of members in these groups can easily exceed the number of police officers. In general, the police will NOT talk about stalking groups. One officer did say there is a storm brewing as groups become larger and more numerous." Added on March 29/06 (code CJ): >Was thinking this a.m. about an incident which happened about >10-8 years back in Key West An interim police chief with the >first name of John resigned his position due to threats on >himself and his family. When pressed for details by reporters, >he stated :"You wouldn't believe it"...I do know that a further >investigation was taken on his behalf by Top Cops around the >country, who then could not figure out how the "threats" were >delivered, although some were made on his phone. I think he >"heard" the threats to himself and family and the Perps seemed >to have highly personal information about him and family. ** TO TARGETS: Keep this case in mind, as it suggests that interim police chief was a target of citizen gang stalking and electronic harassment. Mention it and the others here if you find yourself discussing citizen gang stalking with a police officer. Added on May 12/06 (code DJ): We have a report that two police officers in an Ontario, Canada city have affirmed to a target that they know organized stalking is happening. An investigation was started, stopped, and then restarted and is in progress as of May 12/06. The officers are quoted as saying to the target that they do want a conviction, and that while working on "criminal harassment" cases - their term for organized stalking - is quite difficult, the police report success in dispersing some organized stalker by their presence. Added on July 25/06 (code DJ): This is a follow up to the above entry dated May 12/06. In spite of the really hopeful admission that organized stalking was known to police, and that they wanted to help and obtain convictions, this case got assigned to a detective who flat refuses to "believe" (the word "admit" is more applicable) that organized stalking exists. Furthermore, apparently, this same police department asked the local paper to NOT PUBLISH STORIES ABOUT ORGANIZED STALKING! This is an OUTRAGEOUS abrogation of freedom of speech and the seniour officer responsible should not be allowed to continue in police service! Added on November 16, 2007 (code CS): From a former police officer writing about her ex-husband: "I asked my ex husband who is a very honest law enforcement officer and has been for 37 years. He believed me but said to keep researching and filing reports with my local county... Well now 1 year later he admits he knows of the group and they are stronger then any police organization and they basically leave them alone and do not even talk about them." Added on November 16, 2007 (code DJ): A target who had been having intense on the highway harassment from perpetrator vehicles called the highway patrol agency and complained. The target complained about "cause stalking", which is the term for organized stalking used by private investigator David Lawson in his book by that name. The target asked the highway patrol officer if the officer knew about "cause stalking." The officer replied, "OH, YES!" The officer offered to investigate, but the officer could only go so far, because of a dead end investigating a licence plate. The officer stated emphatically that the officer knew that organized [cause] stalking was a real crime. The target was able to loan a copy of Lawson's book to the officer. Added on November 16, 2007 (code EM): A target who discused organized stalking with a prominent lawyer got the reply "OH, YES!" to the question of whether organized stalking exists.