The Next Deep Throat?
After posting the threatening FBI email on the
Internet, I received information from a person who claims to have knowledge of
the harassment group that targeted me. The person wishes to remain anonymous. I
posed many questions to the person and the person was kind enough to answer
almost all. Below I listed the questions and answers. I copied the questions
and answers from emails we exchanged. This person may be the next Deep Throat.
Questions and Answers:
Question 1:
Who are these people? Law
Enforcement - Military?
Answer:
NSA and certain branches of the FBI and CIA.
Question 2:
Who knows about these people?
Answer:
The head of the NSA and a handful of others.
Question 3:
How far does it go?
Answer:
The project was tested during the cold war, and used
extensively during Desert Storm. It is probably being used in the current war
in
Question 4:
How are they funded?
Answer:
It is funded as "Research" through the
standard channels. The project is relatively inexpensive,
hence it's success and desirability to the NSA.
Question 5:
How do they obtain their restricted technology?
Answer:
The technology originally came from Dr. H. Hammelschammel, a researcher from
Question 6:
Is HUD involved?
Answer:
No.
Question 7:
Are drug companies involved?
Answer:
No.
Question 8:
Who do they target?
Answer:
Generally people who "pose a threat" to
national security, but it is often also used on innocent victims for testing
purposes. This is the part that makes me angry.
Question 9:
Is there anyway to defeat or detect this technology
that can see through walls? Thin metals grounded to earth ground seem to block
it but not 100 percent.
Answer:
The best way to defeat the vision unit is actually a
humidifier. It scrambles the signals to the point of being useless. I have one
in my home, just in case. Even a slightly humidified room is literally
impossible to penetrate. The grounded metal idea works also, but as you said it
doesn't work as well, and it's difficult to set up.
Question 10:
A low level vacuum in a panel is enough to
effectively block the sonic weapons. I've also been exposed for long periods of
time to ultrasonic weapons. Is there a health risk from the exposure to ultrasound
for such a long period of time? I feel fine and suffer no physical damage. I
suffer from sleep depravation, though.
Answer:
And you're right about the vacuum panels, since sound
cannot travel through them. There are other ways to reduce the effects to the
point where they have no effect: carpet, "sound proof" (actually
sound-deadening) walls, foam, sweaters, blankets,
anything that muffles sound. A reasonable combination of these things will help
you greatly.
As far as the testing goes, I wouldn't worry about
it. They test it at levels far lower than what they would use in the field.
Sleep deprivation, depression, anxiety, etc., are common symptoms of this
low-level testing. They would never take the risk of using it at field levels
on a test subject. Also, they are wrapping up the major studies on test
subjects within the next few months, so if you're lucky it won't go on any
longer than that.
Question 11:
Is there any thing I can do to report these people?
Answer:
There's not much that you can do about reporting
them, since no law enforcement agency would be able to track them down. Your
best bet is to take the precautions I have described, and just roll with the
punches to the best of your ability. It'll be over eventually.
I sincerely believe that they're not trying to hurt
you. They really are trying to do this in the national interest, to protect the
citizens. But they have to test the effects somehow, so they do literally
*thousands* of these low-level studies, and add up the results to see what
effects full-usage might have.
Question 12:
Do you know if you can detect this imaging technology
that can see through walls with any detection equipment?
Answer:
There is currently no equipment that can detect it. Corporations, amateur inventors, etc.,
haven't bothered to try for the simple reason that they don't know that such
detection equipment exists.
Question 13:
Is it Millivision (any
other details if possible)?
Answer:
Oh, goodness, no.
Millivision is kid's stuff compared to what
our boys use. I'm not quite clear on the
science behind it, but basically they use a subatomic particle generator and
accelerator to "spray" a wall with particles (very harmless) and then
use computers to identify those that bounce back based on their signatures and
patterns, and reconstruct a 3D model on the terminal. The particles (neutrinos, I believe) are so
small that they can easily pass through walls, floors, etc. The device can actually be used up to see
through 500ft of pure granite, and even that limitation isn't because of the
particles, but only because of the computer that has to interpret the results.
What they see, mind you, isn't photographic in the
sense that a videocamera would be. It's a 3d reconstruction, sometimes very
fuzzy, of what's going on. It can take
months before a trained agent even really understands how to interpret what
he's seeing on the screen.
Question 14:
How long has this testing period been going on with
the American public? I've been targeted since Sept. of 1998.
Answer:
The first public testing was probably conducted in
the early 50s, and has been happening off-and-on (as the technology evolved)
ever since.
Question 15:
Is this testing occurring in other countries? I've
been getting emails from people claiming to be victims from Asian and European
Countries.
Answer:
Yes, because they wanted to test the effects on
people with slightly different genetic makeups and/or
body chemistry (different cultures eat differently, for example, so they have
different chemicals in their bodies).
Interestingly, the most resistent to the
effects (I participated in this particular study) have been the Ainu from
Question 16:
Do you think these haunted house stories are the
result of government testing this technology on the public in the past. So much
of what I've seen on TV of people claiming to live in haunted houses seems
similar to what I experiences from the sonic weapon attacks. I remember you
said this technology first appeared during WW2.
Answer:
It's possible.
Not all of it, but I'm sure there have been some instances where people
who were particular sensitive to the effects and noticed it (such as yourself)
may have interpreted it as such.
Question 17:
Is it possible that real estate companies and/or hate
groups have less advanced versions of this technology?
Answer:
Not a chance.
The system is so complicated that I could drop 300 pages of blueprints
and explanations into the lap of a highly-qualified inventor, and he wouldn't
be able to do a thing with it. Our
prototypes only *barely* work compared to what we know they can do. Some schmuck who wants to harass people
wouldn't go through the kind of trouble that we have.
Question 18:
Is this technology developed by the
Answer:
No commercial entity has access to the
technology. Only the
Question 19:
Do you know how portable this imaging technology is
(the size of it)?
Answer:
I have one sitting on the desk next to me. The components are all enclosed in a trunk
(for easy transportation) about four feet long and around two feet tall. It weighs about 300 pounds. The trunk
contains a computer, a monitor, and the actual device (as well as a lot of
wires, switches, etc.)
Question 20:
Do you know the average size of the sonic weapons? I
ask about size because my neighbors seem to be able to move this technology in
and out of their homes without drawing any attention.
Answer:
It comes in the same kind of trunk as the imaging
technology, so they're probably just doing it when you don't notice, or they
have it there and haven't removed it.
Happy to help.
Again, I just want to say that nobody's out to get you, and in fact
they're doing it for your benefit (though it must not seem like it). National security is in everyone's best
interest, so unfortunately they sometimes have to let a few people have
unpleasant experiences in order to find out how to save millions upon millions
in the future. These devices have
probably already prevented a nuclear holocaust in the United
States.
Question 21:
Do you know how these people are able to hear thorough
walls? Are they using lasers bouncing off windows or something more
sophisticated? I ask because it appears that they can hear a person breathing
through a wall from a distance. Do you know the technical information of how
they achieve this?
Answer:
They use small robotic devices (aptly called
"bugs") to crawl through the walls and listen. They move toward
sound, and away from silence. They hear people talking and move toward them.
Question 22:
I guess you already know that they can shock a person
with what feels like an electrical charge through walls also? Is it electricity
or something else? There was a rumor about the CIA having a device that can
kill a person through a wall by stopping his heart, is this the device?
Answer:
It's not electricity, it's
plasma (as in the physical state). It's a different device from the heart
stopper.
Question 23:
These people appear to have technology that can
detect silent unspoken words a person unintentionally produces when for
instance reading to himself. I assume that they have a
device that can detect the small vibrations the vocal cords produce. Do you
know of a device such as this? If so can you provide any technical detail about
it? These people seem to be able to basically eavesdrop on a person's private
thoughts. Does it cause any damage to the body of the person it’s used on?
Answer:
The listening bugs are highly sensitive to sound, and
are programmed to interpret even very soft, sub-vocal sounds. This does not
harm the listener.
Question 24:
Do you think the people who claim mindcontrol
are mistaking this "vocal cord reader" and the effects of sonic
weapons (jolts to the body...ect.) for mindcontrol? Is there a conspiracy by these people to trick
victims into believing that mindcontrol conspiracy theories
exist. HAARP, for example.
Can these people read a person thoughts with a device
of some kind or control a person's mind?
Answer:
There is no conspiracy to do anything. That's a
common misunderstanding. It's just routine testing of devices used for national
security. Because it's done purely at random, people (the few who detect it)
often wonder why it's happening to them, so they come up with these conspiracy
theories. It really has nothing to do with you personally, but rather your name
was randomly picked from a computer database.
Question 25:
Are politicians being placed under surveillance for
political reasons or national security? I ask because I may have been targeted
simply as a political favor.
Answer:
The devices are in no way used for political
purposes. No politicians have access to the device, and the people who have the
device and control it really don't care about political issues, but simply want
to keep our country safe.
Question 26:
Could you tell me about the organization of these
people? Who decides who to target? Who is in charge of the operation? Where is
all this secret equipment stored? What happens if it falls into the wrong
hands? What happens if one of these people goes crazy and decides to go after a
public official, such as the president?
Answer:
The organization of the committee is simple: There is
a "chair" who is fully responsible for the
project, half a dozen researchers, and half a dozen field agents. Because of
the small group and nature of the project, our tasks often overlap. We're
"jacks of all trades" you might say.
The equipment is stored in an armory in
The equipment cannot fall into the wrong hands. Only
one operation takes place at a time, and they are set up such that if something
were to go terribly wrong and someone were to take the equipment, they would be
dead within 60 seconds, probably because of a "car accident".
Naturally, we take this equipment very seriously, and you can understand that
it *must* not fall into the wrong hands.
Our agents go through a battery of psychological and
physical tests that make the NASA entrance requirements look like a McDonald's
application. They know more about me than my own wife does. "Going
crazy" simply will not happen.
Question 27:
What type of person would be a threat to national
security that would warrant this type of surveillance? Would Timothy McVeigh
have been targeted before the bombing?
Answer:
Generally, the device is not used for security
purposes within the
Question 28:
Does the secret service have detection equipment to
detect this targeting system that can target a person through a wall?
Answer:
The secret service does not have detection equipment
that could find any of our devices.
[END]