Get paid to surf

MindNet is no longer active.

Back to MindNet Index

================================================================
     MindNet Journal - Vol. 1, No. 3f * [Part 6 of 6 parts]
================================================================
     V E R I C O M M / MindNet         "Quid veritas est?"
================================================================

Notes:

The following is reproduced here with the express permission of
the author.

Permission is given to reproduce and redistribute, for
non-commercial purposes only, provided this information and the
copy, remain intact and unedited.

The views, and opinions, expressed below are not necessarily the
views and opinions of VERICOMM, MindNet, or the editor, unless
otherwise noted.

Editor: Mike Coyle 

================================================================
   
[Continued from part 5]
      
      52. Lawrence, WERE WE CONTROLLED?, 36-37; Anita Gregory,
"Introduction to Leonid L. Vasilev's EXPERIMENTS IN DISTANT
INFLUENCE," PSYCHIC WARFARE: FACT OR FICTION (editor: John White)
(Nottinghamshire: Aquarian, 1988) 34-57.
      53. Lawrence, WERE WE CONTROLLED?, 38.
      54. Bowart, OPERATION MIND CONTROL, 261-264.
      55. Ibid. 263.
      56. Lawrence, WERE WE CONTROLLED?, 52.
      57. HUMAN DRUG TESTING BY THE CIA, 202.
      58. Note especially the Supreme Court's decision in CENTRAL
INTELLIGENCE AGENCY ET Al. V. SIMS, ET AL. (No. 83-1075; decided
April 16, 1986). The egregious and dangerous majority opinion in
this case held that disclosure of the names of scientists and
institutions involved in MKULTRA posed an  "unacceptable risk of
revealing 'intelligence sources.'  The decisions of the [CIA]
Director, who must of course be familiar with 'the whole
picture,' as judges are not, are worthy of great deference...it
is conceivable that the  mere explanation of why information must
be withheld can convey valuable information to a foreign
intelligence agency."  How do we square this continu- ing need
for secrecy with the CIA's protestations that MKULTRA achieved
little success, that the studies were conducted within the
Nueremberg statues govern- ing medical experiments, and that the
research was made available in the open literature?
      59. Letter, P.A. Lindstrom to Robert Naeslund, July 27,
1983; copy  available from Martti Koski, Kiilinpellontie 2, 21290
Rusko, Finland. Lind- strom writes that he fully agrees with
Lincoln Lawrence, author of WERE WE CONTROLLED?
      60. Bowart, OPERATION MIND CONTROL, 265. I have attempted
without  success to contact Dr. Lindstrom.
      61. Bowart, OPERATION MIND CONTROL, 233-249. This interview
was  repinted without attribution in a bizarre compendium of UFO
rumors called THE MATRIX, compiled by "Valdamar Valerian"
(actually John Grace, allegedly a captain working for Air Force
intelligence).
      62. Robert Anton Wilson, "Adventures with Head Hardware,"
MAGICAL BLEND, 23 [of course], July 1989.
      63. Michael Hutchison, MEGA BRAIN (New York: Ballantine,
1986); Gerald Oster, "Auditory Beats in the Brain," SCIENTIFIC
AMERICAN, September, 1973.
      64. Marilyn Ferguson, THE BRAIN REVOLUTION (New York:
Taplinger, 1973), 90.
      65. Ibid., 91-92. The presence of delta in a waking subject
can indicate pathology.
      66. Bio-Pacer promotional and price sheet, available from
Lindemann Laboratories, 3463 State Street, #264, Santa Barbara,
CA 93105.
      67. Hutchison, MEGA BRAIN, 117-118. Compare Light's
observations about "the grant game" to Sid Gottlieb's
protestations that nearly all "mind con- trol" research was
openly published.
      68. Thomas Martinez and John Gunther, THE BROTHERHOOD OF
MURDER (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1988), 230.
      69. Interview, Sandy Monroe of the Los Angeles office of
the Christic Institute.
      70. See generally Paul Brodeur, THE ZAPPING OF AMERICA
(Toronto, George J. MacLeod, 1977).
      71. Until recently, the American Embassy was on a street
named after the composer.
      72. It was finally determined that the microwaves were used
to receive transmissions from bugs planted within the embassy.
DARPA director George H. Heimeier went on record stating that
PANDORA was never designed to study "microwaves as a surveillance
tool."  See Anne Keeler, "Remote Mind Control Technology," FULL
DISCLOSURE #15. I would note that the Soviet embassy was "bugged
and waved" in Canada during the 1950s, and according to the Los
Angeles TIMES (June 5, 1989), the Soviet embassy in Britain had
been similarly affected.
      73. Ronald I. Adams R.A. Williams, BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF
ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION (RADIOWAVES AND MICROWAVES) EURASIAN
COMMUNIST COUNTRIES, (Defense Intelligence Agency, March 1976.)
Brodeur notes that much of the work ascribed to the Soviets in
this report was actually first accomplished by scientists in the
United States. Keeler argues that this report constitutes an
example of "mirror imaging" -- i.e., parading domestic advances
as a foreign threat, the better to pry funding from a
suitably-fearful Congress.
      74. Keeler, "Remote Mind Control Technology."
      75. R.J. MacGregor, "A Brief Survey of Literature Relating
to Influence  of Low Intensity Microwaves on Nervous Function"
(Santa Monica: RAND Corpor- ation, 1970).
      76. Keeler, "Remote Mind Control Technology."
      77. Larry Collins, "Mind Control," PLAYBOY, January 1990.
      78. Allan H. Frey, "Behavioral Effects of Electromagnetic
Energy," SYMPOSIUM ON BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS AND MEASUREMENTS OF
RADIO FREQUENCIES/MICRO- WAVES, DeWitt G. Hazzard, editor (U.S.
Department of Health, Education and Welfare, 1977).
      79. quoted in THE APPLICATION OF TESLA'S TECHNOLOGY IN
TODAY'S WORLD (Montreal: Lafferty, Hardwood & Partners, Ltd.,
1978).
      80. Keeler, "Remote Mind Control Technology."
      81. L. George Lawrence, "Electronics and Brain Control,"
POPULAR ELECTRONICS, July 1973.
      82. Susan Schiefelbein, "The Invisible Threat," SATURDAY
REVIEW, September 15, 1979.
      83. E. Preston, "Studies on the Nervous System,
Cardiovascular Function and Thermoregulation," BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS
OF RADIO FREQUENCY AND MICROWAVE RADIATION, edited by H.M.
Assenheim (Ottawa, Canada: National Research Council of Canada,
1979), 138-141.
      84. Robert O. Becker, THE BODY ELECTRIC (New York: William
Morrow, 1985) 318-319.
      85. Ibid.
      86. Ibid., 321.
      87. See Bowart's OPERATION MIND CONTROL, page 218, for an
interesting example of this "rationalization" process at work in
the case of Sirhan  Sirhan, who was convicted for the
assassination of Robert F. Kennedy. In  prison, Sirhan was
hypnotized by Dr. Bernard Diamond, who instructed Sirhan to climb
the bars of his cage like a monkey. He did so. After the trance
was removed, Sirhan was shown tapes of his actions; he insisted
that he "acted like a monkey" of his own free will -- he claimed
he wanted the exercise.
      88. Keeler suggests that the proposal was revealed only
because  Schapitz' sensationalistic implications may have worked
to his discredit --  and therefore hide -- the REAL research.
Personally, I don't accept this argument, but I respect Keeler's
instincts enough to repeat her caveat here.
      89. Margaret Cheney's TESLA: A MAN OUT OF TIME (New York:
Dell, 1981), the most reliable book in the sea of wild
speculation surrounding this  extraordinary scientist, confirms
Tesla's early work with the psychological effects of
electromagnetic radiation. See especially pages 101-104; note
also the afterword, in which we learn that certain government
agencies have kept important research by Tesla hidden from the
general public.
      90. Noted in Lawrence, WERE WE CONTROLLED?, 29.
      91. Particularly one Thomas Bearden of Huntsville, Alabama;
I have in my possession a document written by Bearden associate
Andrew Michrowski which identifies Bearden as an intelligence
agent for an undisclosed agency.
      92. Kathleen McAuliffe, "The Mind Fields," OMNI magazine,
February 1985.
      93. May 5, 1985.
      94. I refer to an individual who later wrote a very
clear-headed and thoughtful letter to Dr. Paul Lowinger, who has
graciously made his files available to me. For now, I feel
compelled to withhold this person's name.
      95. Cameron became president of the American Psychiatric
Association, the Canadian Psychiatric Association, and the World
Association of Psychia- trists,  He previously sat on the
Nueremberg panel, helping to draw up the statutes governing
ethical medical behavior!
      96. In particular, Opton and Scheflin's overview, though
excellent in scope and detail, continually seeks reassurring
interpretations of evidence which points toward more distressing
conclusions.
      97. Martin T. Orne, "Can a hypnotized subject be compelled
to carry out otherwise unacceptable behavior?" INTERNATIONAL
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERI- MENTAL HYPNOSIS, 1972, Vol. 20,
101-117.
      98. Marks mentions, in a letter to Orne, the latter's claim
to have been an unwitting participant in subproject 84. Yet the
papers released concerning subproject 84 clearly establish the
Agency's willingness to put Orne in the know; Orne later admitted
to Marks that he was made aware of his CIA sponsor- ship (Marks,
THE SEARCH FOR "THE MANCHURIAN CANDIDATE", 172-173). In an
interview with Marks, Orne discounted the story of Candy Jones
(which we shall recount later) by insisting that if such an
experiment had occurred "someone in some agency would have come
to me."  Why would they come to him about a super-secret project,
unless Orne had a high security clearance and worked extensively
with intelligence agencies? Note also that Orne conducted exten-
sive studies for the Office of Naval Research from June 1, 1968
to May 31, 1971. He has also been funded by DARPA. Moreover, I
consider noteworthy the fact that Orne somehow became president
of the Society for Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis despite the
fact that the organization had decided not to have a president.
(This fact was related to Marks by a prominent hypnosis
specialist in an off-the-record interview that I probably wasn't
supposed to see.)
      99. The story has been told many times. See Turner and
Christian's THE KILLING OF ROBERT F. KENNEDY, 207-208; also Peter
J. Reiter, ANTISOCIAL OR CRIMINAL ACTS AND HYPNOSIS (Springfield,
Illinois: Charles C. Thomas, 1958).
      100. John G. Watkins, "Antisocial behavior under hypnosis:
Possible or impossible?"  INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR CLINICAL AND
EXPERIMENTAL HYPNOSIS, 1972, Vol. 20, 95-100.
      101. Milton H. Erickson, "An experimental investigation of
the possible anti-social use of hypnosis," PSYCHIATRY, 1939, vol.
2. Erickson argues that if a hypnotist has convinced his subject
to misperceive reality, then result- ing actions cannot be
considered "anti-social," for the actions would be acceptable
within the subject's internal reality construct. This argument
strikes me as semantic quibbling. [not me -jpg]
      102. See generally Flo Conway and Jim Seigelman, SNAPPING
(New York: Lippincott, 1978).
      103. Lee and Schlain, ACID DREAMS, 8-9.
      104. John Marks interview with Victor Marchetti, December
19, 1977  (Marks files).
      105. Martin T. Orne, "On the Mechanisms of Posthypnotic
Amnesia," THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL
HYPNOSIS, 1966, vol. 14, 121-134. Orne's work with post-hypnotic
amnesia was funded by NIMH, the Air Force Office of Scientific
Research, and the Office of Naval Research. I  should like to
hear what innocent explanation, if any, the Air Force has to
offer to explain their interest in post-hypnotic amnesia. ["We
must not allow a post-hypnotic-amnesia gap!" of course. -jpg]
      106. Bowart, OPERATION MIND CONTROL, 242-243.
      107. Obviously Allan Dulles. This may have been a
hypnotically-induced delusion; on the other hand, Dulles'
legendary sexual rapacity makes this claim rather less unlikely
than one might first assume.
      108. Always the best indicator of whether or not hypnosis
is genuine; I can't understand why Orne didn't use this test in
the Blanchi case.
      109. Herbert Spiegel, "Hypnosis and evidence: Help or
hindrance," ANN. N.Y. ACAD. SCI.; 1980, 347, 73-85.
      110. See, for example, Kroger, HYPNOSIS AND BEHAVIOR
MODIFICATION, 21-22
      111. See especially Klass, UFO ABDUCTIONS: A DANGEROUS
GAME, 60-61. Orne, interviewed here, makes reference to the work
summarized in his article "The use and misuse of hypnosis in
court" (INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL HYPNOSIS, 1979, vol.
27, 311-341.)
      112. Klass argues that ufologists, in conducting hypnotic
regression sessions, inadvertently cue their subjects. A close
reading of his text reveals that he never proves or claims that
such "cues" have taken place in any individual instance; he
simply believes that cueing MIGHT have occurred. Had Klass been
more willing to deal with abductees directly, he might have found
evidence of cause and effect; as it stands, his argument really
amounts to no more than a suggestion. For all that, I find his
ideas regarding the running of "clean" hypnotic regression
sessions potentially valuable.
      113. Marks, THE SEARCH FOR "THE MANCHURIAN CANDIDATE",
34-37.
      114. Donald Bain, THE CONTROL OF CANDY JONES (Chicago,
Playboy Press, 1976).
      115. The use of hypnotized couriers in warfare goes back to
the 19th century.
      116. Estabrooks, HYPNOTISM, 193-214.
      117. John Marks interview with Milton Kline, December 22,
1977 (Marks files). In another interview, Professor Clare Young
(a colleague of Esta- brooks' at Colgate University) confirmed
that Estabrooks' hypnosis work for the government has never been
published.
      118. Or could her marriage have been part of the program?
"Long John," as he was popularly known, was famous in UFO
circles, and had provided a forum for such early-day contactees
as Howard Menger. He also knew Jackie Gleason, a prominent (if
unlikely) name in the "crashed disc" rumor vaults. Could  Candy
have been assigned to discover what Nebel knew?
      119. Marks files. John Marks did excellent work on the
Candy Jones story; he erred -- almost unforgivably -- on the side
of conservatism when he refused to include information about this
incident in his book. I know the name of  the institute involved;
however, since Candy saw fit to keep this aspect of  her story
secret (probably for sound legal reasons), I shall follow her
lead.
      120. Scheflin and Opton, THE MIND MANIPULATORS, 446-447.
      121. Interviews, Marks files. One of Marks' informants
offered the interesting speculation that Candy's torture sessions
were not conducted in the field, but in the lab -- her entire
mission might have been a hypno- programmed fantasy.
      122. The information about Candy's CIA files stems from a
telephone interview with Candy Jones. A problem looms here: CIA
cover stories unravel like the skin of an onion; once you remove
the outer layer, the next lie is revealed. [For this reason, I
don't think this paper "reveals" the whole truth; that, I
suspect, is far worse. -jpg]  In the case of Candy Jones, the
substrata of buncombe involves allegations that she WILLINGLY
complied with the CIA, and used Jensen's hypnosis experiments as
a rationalization for her compliance. Such is the explanation
offered by certain of Marks' informants; alas, Opton and Scheflin
seem to have bought this line. Anyone familiar with the vile acts
of self-degradation to which Candy's programmers subjected her
will laugh this story out of court. No one, short of a severely
psychotic masochist, would willingly undergo what she went
through.
      123. Marks files.
      124. William Kroger, CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL HYPNOSIS
(Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1963), 299.
      125. Recently, ufologist Jim Moseley, an acquaintance of
Candy's, has claimed that an unidentified source on Nebel's
"inner circle" once, off-the- record, pronounced Candy's story "a
crock."  This assertion deserves careful and respectful
consideration. Still, Moseley won't identify his source, and we
have no way of telling if this insider spoke from instinct or
certain knowledge, or indeed, what he really meant. Did he feel
Candy was fantasizing or fibbing? If the former, why did her
hallucinations match details of  MKULTRA released only after
publication of her book? If the latter, how are we to explain the
many hypnotic regression tapes, at least some of which were made
available to outside investigators? (Fairly elaborate, for a
hoax.)  In any case, how could Candy have known the fact
(confirmed by Marks' associates) that Kroger taught "Jensen" at a
certain West-coast institute? Why, if the story was "a crock,"
would Candy risk libel suits by naming -- to associates and
investigators, if not to the general public -- real-life
hypnotherapists? All in all, I would suggest that Moseley's
"insider" was speaking glibly, and did not know the true facts.
[Or was speaking disinformationally. -jpg]
      126. Philadelphia, Lippincott, 1976.
      127. Ibid., 415.
      128. Similar paranoid outbreaks led to the dissolution of
Dr. Richard Neal's UFO abductee group in Los Angeles, according
to a phone interview I had with Dr. Neal.
      129. Affidavit of Dr. Simpson-Kallas in the case of
Sirhan-Sirhan, 1973; see Bowart, OPERATION MIND CONTROL, 225.
      130. All true MPs have experienced some form of abuse or
trauma, psycho- logical or physical, during childhood.
      131. One was ritually abused in an occult setting. If I
were a "spy- chiatrist" scouting potential fodder for mind
control experiments, I would seek out abused children from
military families. (A military background would ensure that the
"right" doctor gets access to the child.)  Abduction researchers
should look for such a pattern.
      132. I refer here to the vast upsurge in alien abductions
which took place that year; see generally Kevin Randle, THE
OCTOBER SCENARIO (Middle Coast, 1988). Of course, abductions (or,
according to my hypothesis, dis- guised mind control operations)
occurred previous to this year.
      133. John Marks interview with Milton Kline, December 22,
1977 (Marks files).
      134. Brenda Butler ET AL., SKY CRASH, expanded edition
(London: Grafton Books, 1986), 305-321, 354-355.
      135. Telephone interview with Nancy Wright.
      136. Telephone interview with Miranda Parks.
      137. William Moore, "UFOs and the U.S. Government," FOCUS,
vol. 4, June 30, 1989. Moore's role in the affair strikes me as
highly questionable, even scandalous -- although at least here we
have one instance of direct and irrefutable "insider" testimony
of government harassment.
      138. Some have also raised questions about his psychiatric
treatment of Oswald assassin Jack Ruby. I find it odd that a CIA
mind control veteran -- who did NOT reside or practice in Dallas
-- should have been assigned to the Ruby case.
      139. Samiel Chavkin, THE MIND STEALERS (New York: Houghton
Mifflin, 1978), 96-107.
      140. Raymond Fowler, THE ANDREASSON AFFAIR (New York:
Prentice Hall, 1979).
      141. New York: Warner Books, 1989; 198-202.
      142. Ruth Montgomery, ALIENS AMONG US (Ballantine, 1985),
49. My article "Psychiatric Abuse of UFO Witness," referred to
earlier, also documents this phenomenon.
      143. Chung-Kwang Chou and Arthur W. Guy, "Quantization of
Microwave Biological Effects," SYMPOSIUM OF BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS
AND MEASUREMENT OF RADIO FREQUENCY/MICROWAVES, edited by Dewitt
G. Hazzard (U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare,
1977).
      144. MIAMI HERALD, May 28, 1984 and June 6, 1984; NATIONAL
EXAMINER, vol. 22, no. 18, April 30, 1985. Although the EXAMINER
is a supermarket tabloid, and therefore a questionable source,
this periodical has rendered researchers the service of printing
the X-ray of Petit's brain, showing the implant. [Ever heard of
airbrushing? -jpg]
      145. Los Angeles TIMES, March 28, 1988.
      146. Raymond Fowler, THE ANDREASSON AFFAIR, PHASE TWO
(Reward, 1982).  This book includes rare photographs of the
unmarked helicopters which have plagued this abduction victim and
her family.
      147. A mutual friend described for me an incident in which
the former  SEAL, mistakenly perceiving a threat, almost
instantly felled, and nearly killed, a man twice his size.
Whatever the truth of my informant's other statements, he
certainly has received advanced combat training.
      148. Fenton Bresler, WHO KILLED JOHN LENNON? (New York: St.
Martin's  Press, 1989), 45-46.
      149. Bowart, OPERATION MIND CONTROL, 27-42.
      150. Denise Winn, THE MANIPULATED MIND (London, Octagon
Press, 1983), 72-73; Bresler, WHO KILLED JOHN LENNON?, 41; see
generally: Peter Watson, WAR ON THE MIND (London: Hutchison,
1978) (Watson broke the story on Narut for the London TIMES). 
      151. Larry Collins, "Mind Control," PLAYBOY, January 1990.
      152. John Marks interview with Milton Kline, December 22,
1977 (Marks files).
      153. Richard A. Gabriel, NO MORE HEROES (New York: Hill and
Wang, 1987), 124.
      154. Ibid., 150-151.
      155. See generally: Mark Lane, CONVERSATIONS WITH AMERICANS
(Simon and Shuster, 1970); A.J. Langguth, HIDDEN TERRORS (New
York: Pantheon, 1978).
      156. John G. Fuller, THE INTERRUPTED JOURNEY (New York:
Dell, 1966).
      157. This detail plays a part in other abductions -- for
example, it crops up in the Betty Andreasson Luca case. See
Raymond Fowler, THE ANDREAS- SON AFFAIR (New York: Bantam, 1980),
50-51.
      158. Stanton Friedman, for example; the reader is referred
to his 1988 Whole Life Expo lecture, "UFOs: A Cosmic Watergate."
      159. THE BODY ELECTRIC, 196-202.
      160. The Fish map has received wide discussion; for a
representative sampling, the reader is directed to the
aforementioned Friedman lecture (note 158); Terence Dickenson,
"The Zeti Reticuli Incident," ASTRONOMY, December, 1974; Klass,
UFO ABDUCTIONS: A DANGEROUS GAME, 20-23; and John Rimmer, THE
EVIDENCE FOR ALIEN ABDUCTIONS (Weillingborough: Aquarian, 1984),
88-92. Incidentally, Klass has proposed to Friedman a test
regarding the ability to recall such material accurately under
hypnotic regression; Friedman, for reasons best known to himself,
declined the offer to participate.
      161. Jacques Vallee, DIMENSIONS (Chicago: Contemporary,
1988), 266.
      162. See Rimmer, THE EVIDENCE FOR ALIEN ABDUCTIONS, 91-92.
None of this is meant to denigrate Marjorie Fish, whose work has
received universal praise.
      163. Fuller, THE INTERRUPTED JOURNEY, 18-19.
      164. Athan G. Theoharis and John Stuart Cox, THE BOSS: J.
EDGAR HOOVER AND THE GREAT AMERICAN INQUISITION (Philadelphia:
Temple University Press, 1978), 325; Chip Berlet, "The Hunt for
the Red Menace," COVERT ACTION INFORM- ATION BULLETIN, no. 31
(winter, 1989); J. Edgar Hoover, COINTELPRO (memo), March 4,
1968.
      165. For example, Delgado's work pre-dates the Hill
incident. Moreover, one of the few pages released on MKULTRA
subproject 119 concerns "a critical review of the literature and
scientific developments related to the recording, analysis and
interpretation of bioelectric signals from the human organism,
and activation of human behavior by remote means."  The review
took place in 1960-61. Presumably, the CIA wanted to DO something
with the information so derived.
      166. "UFO Abductions Workshop," Whole Life Expo, March,
1988.
      167. Ludwig Mayer, DIE TECHNIC DER HYPNOSE (Munich: J.H.
Lehmanns Verlag, 1953), 225; quoted in: Heinz E. Hammerschlag
(translation: John Cohen) HYPNOTISM AND CRIME (Hollywood:
Wilshire Book Company, 1957), 24-25.
      168. Numerous articles discuss this possibility; see, for
example, William C. Coe ET AL. "An Approach Toward Isolating
Factors that Influence Antisocial Conduct in Hypnosis," THE
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL HYPNOSIS,
1972, vol XX, no. 2, 118-131, as well as other reports in that
issue. The difference between the laboratory and the "field"
settings may account for the success of Mayer's experiment and
the apparent failure of the "aliens."  [Or perhaps Hopkins'
informant REALIZED he was in Miniluv and his autonomy was on the
line; he reacted against this standard Gestapo procedure as best
he could: by turning the gun on O'Brien. -jpg]
      169. For a description of a quite similar experiment
conducted under CIA auspices in 1954, see "CIA able to control
minds by hypnosis, data shows," THE WASHINGTON POST, February 19,
1978.
      170. Abductee interview, "Veronica."  The reader will, I
hope, forgive my use of a pseudonym here. For the most part, I
hope to deal in this work with published cases. Suffice it to
say, Veronica's testimony proved fascinating, troubling,
convoluted, problematical; in spite of all the questions raised
by this case, I still believe it to have substantial bearing on
my thesis. The reader will forgive me for severing relations with
this abductee before completing an investigation; she keeps a
mini-armory next to her bed.
      171. Abductee interview, "Veronica,"  At one point, she ran
an informal abductee/contactee group; as a result, she was able
to describe many other cases to me. [Pseudomemories programmed
into her? -jpg]
      172. One ARTICHOKE document explicitly details a failed
attempt to use hypnosis to induce the assassination of a foreign
leader. The document is undated; the experiment took place
January 8-January 15, 1954. Document  reproduced in CIA PAPERS,
vol. 1 (Ann Arbor, MI: Capitol Information Asso- ciates,
1986),39-41.
      173. John Marks interview of Prof. Jack Tracktir (Marks
files).
      174. Jenny Randles, ABDUCTIONS (London: Robert Hale, 1988),
52-53.
      175. As in, for example, the Palle Hardrup affair.
      176. Private correspondence, Robert Durant to the author.
      177. Abductee interview, "Polly."  I won't give the facial
details here; suffice it to say that this abductor, like
Margary's (noted earlier), has something of the smell of
greasepaint about him.
      178. The base is mantioned in Ann Druffel's and D. Scott
Rogo's THE  TUJUNGA CANYON CONTACTS (New York: Signet, 1989)
[expanded edition], 157.
      179. On the other hand, Armstrong asks us to accept his own
channelled material, so he would have an awkward time should he
choose to challenge the "psychic impressions" of others.
      180. Jacques Vallee, MESSENGERS OF DECEPTION (Berkeley:
And/Or Press, 1979), 192-193.
      181. Curtis G. Fuller (editor), PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIRST
INTERNATIONAL UFO CONGRESS (New York: Warner Books, 1980), 307.
      182. For information of Pelley, see John Roy Carlson, UNDER
COVER (New York: Dutton, 1943).
      183. Gerald B. Bryan, PSYCHIC DICTATORSHIP IN AMERICA (Los
Angeles: Truth Research, 1940). An essential book-length expose
of Ballardism. One of Bryan's sources alleges that Ballard,
before founding the I AM group, may have practiced some variety
of black magic.
      184. The student should carefully compare the I AM dogma
with the available information on pre-Third Reich occultism; the
best sources are James Webb's masterful analyses, THE OCCULT
ESTABLISHMENT and THE OCCULT UNDERGROUND (La Salle, Illinois:
Open Court Publishing, 1976).
      185. Vallee, MESSENGERS OF DECEPTION, 192-194.
      186. Even a cursory examination of Williamson's SECRET OF
THE ANDES (London: Neville Superman, 1961), written under the
pseudonym Brother Philip, will reveal the I AM connections.
      187. Personal sources. Van Tassell's "Integration," a domed
structure allegedly built under extra-terrestrial guidance
(located near 29 Palms, California) prominently displays, to this
day, key I AM artifacts such as the portraits of Jesus and Saint
Germain (commissioned by Ballard).
      188. "The Afghan Arms Pipeline," COVERT ACTION INFORMATION
BULLETIN, no. 30 (summer, 1988).
      189. Telephone interview with John Judge.
      190. Village of Oak Creek, Arizona: Entheos, 1989, 119. I
can't recall ever encountering another book title which contained
so many grammatical errors. Armstrong's accomplishment is
genuinely impressive.
      191. For further information on I AM, Prophet's
organization, saucer cults, and other groups, see the appropriate
sections of J. Gordon Melton's ENCYCLOPEDIA OF AMERICAN RELIGION.
      192. Ruth Montgomery, ALIENS AMONG US (New York:
Ballantine, 1985), 128-188.
      193. Penny Harper, "Are Aliens Taking Over the Earth?"
WHOLE LIFE TIMES, January 1990.
      194. John Keel, WHY UFOS: OPERATION TROJAN HORSE (New York:
Manor Books, 1970) [paperback edition], 228.
      195. Hickson and Mendez, UFO CONTACT AT PASCAGOULA, 242.
      196. Strieber, COMMUNION, 134; TRANSFORMATION, 109.
      197. "Contactee: Firsthand," UFO magazine, vol. 4, no. 2,
1989.
      198. Telephone conversation, Tom Adams.
      199. Ed Conroy, REPORT ON COMMUNION (New York: William
Morrow, 1989), 365-385.
      200. "Contactee: Firsthand," UFO magazine, vol. 3, no. 3.
      201. New York: Zebra, 1971. See especially note 2, Chap. 9.

                    SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY ON MIND CONTROL

ACID DREAMS, by Martin A. Lee and Bruce Shlain (Grove, 1985).
Outstanding work on MKULTRA and drugs.

THE BODY ELECTRIC, by Robert Becker (Morrow, 1985). Important.

THE BRAIN CHANGERS, by Maya Pines (Signet, 1973). Outdated, but
an excellent chapter on the stimoceiver and related technologies.

BRAIN CONTROL, by Elliot Valenstein (John Wiley and Sons, 1973).
Highly conservative; outdated; still worth reading.

CIA PAPERS, compiled by Capitol Information Associates (POB 8275,
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48107). Interesting selection of MKULTRA
documents.

THE CONTROL OF CANDY JONES, by Donald Bain (Playboy Press, 1976).
Mandatory reading.

HUMAN DRUG TESTING BY THE CIA, hearings before the Subcommittee
on Health and Scientific Research on the Committee on Human Resources,
United States Senate (Government Printing Office, 1977).

HYPNOTISM, by George Estabrooks (Dutton, 1957). See especially
the chapters on hypnosis in warfare and crime. Some modern experts 
in clinical hypnosis decry Estabrooks' work. These "experts" tend 
to have a history of funding by CIA cut-outs and military 
intelligence. I suspect they denounce Estabrooks not because his 
work was shoddy, but because he let the cat out of the bag.

INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND THE FEDERAL ROLE IN BEHAVIOR MODIFICATION,
by the Staff of the Subcommittee on Constitutional Rights of the
Committee of the INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND THE FEDERAL ROLE IN
BEHAVIOR MODIFICATION, by the Staff of the Subcommittee on 
Constitutional Rights of the Committee of the Judiciary, United 
States Senate (Government Printing Office, 1974).

MEGABRAIN, by Michael Hutchison (Ballantine, 1986). The only
popular book on modern mind machines.

MESSENGERS OF DECEPTION, by Jacques Vallee (And/Or, 1979). Vallee
has been criticized, correctly, for including in this book 
invented "conversations" with a composite character he calls 
Major Murphy. But the section on cults in this book bears a 
haunting resemblance to stories I have heard in my own 
investigations.

THE MIND MANIPULATORS, by Opton and Scheflin (Paddington Press,
1978). Conservative, but extremely useful as a reference work.

MIND WARS, by Ronald McCrae (St. Martin's Press, 1984).

OPERATION MIND CONTROL, by Walter Bowart (Dell, 1978). The best
single volume on the subject. Difficult to find; indeed, this 
book's rapid disappearance from bookstores and libraries has 
aroused the suspicions of some researchers. (Tom David Books, 
POB 1107, Aptos, CA 95001, carries this work.)

PHYSICAL CONTROL OF THE MIND, by Jose Delgado (Harper and Row,
1969). Outdated but still essential.

PROJECT MKULTRA, joint hearing before the Select Committee on
Health and Scientific Research of the Committee on Human 
Resources, United States Senate (Government Printing Office, 
1977).

PSYCHIC WARFARE: FACT OR FICTION? edited by John White (Aquarian,
1988). See especially Michael Rossman's contribution.

PSYCHOTECHNOLOGY, Robert L. Schwitzgebel and Ralph K.
Schwitzgebel (Holt, Rhinehart and Winston, 1973).

THE SCIENTIST, by John Lilly (expanded edition: Ronin, 1988).
Bizarre -- Lilly is an ex-"brainwashing" specialist who claims 
to be in contact with aliens. Is he controlled or controlling?

THE SEARCH FOR "THE MANCHURIAN CANDIDATE", by John Marks (Bantam,
1978). An invaluable book. However, many people have made the 
mistake of assuming it tells the full story. It does not.

WERE WE CONTROLLED? by Lincoln Lawrence (University Books, 1967).
Explores possible connections to the JFK assassination. Dr. 
Petter Lindstrom's endorsement of this work makes it mandatory 
reading.

WHO KILLED JOHN LENNON? by Fenton Bresler (St. Martin's Press,
1989). Interesting thesis concerning the possible use of mind
control on Mark David Chapman. Better in its analysis of 
Chapman than in its history of mind control. In my own work, 
I have encountered data which may help confirm Bresler's theory.

THE ZAPPING OF AMERICA, by Paul Brodeur (MacLeod [Canadian
edition], 1976). Contains a good chapter on microwave mind 
control technology.

The important stories of Martti Koski and Robert Naeslund can be
obtained by sending three dollars to Martti Koski,
Kiilinpellontie 2, 21290 Rusko,  FINLAND. Koski's description of
his "programming" sessions should not be  taken at face value; we
cannot always trust the perception of someone whose perception
has been altered. His research into the technology of mind
control is solid.

[END]
----------------------------------------------------------------
VERICOMM BBS Filename: [control.zip] = [control.txt]
================================================================

To subscribe to the MindNet Journal:

Send message: [subscribe mindnet] to: .

To unsubscribe:

Send message: [unsubscribe mindnet] to: .

Submission of articles for publication within the MindNet 
Journal on the subjects of mind control, directed-energy 
weapons, non-lethal weapons, ritual abuse, UFO abductions, 
electromagnetics, hypnosis, and other related topics, will be 
accepted with the author's statement of permission to publish. 
The editor reserves the right to accept or reject for 
publication. Send articles for submission to: , 
or VERICOMM BBS 510.891.0303, or VERICOMM, POB 32314, Oakland, 
CA 94604-2314 USA.

The MindNet Journal is produced in cooperation with the
Freedom Of Thought Foundation and the International Committee
for the Convention Against Offensive Microwave Weapons. Please
visit the Freedom Of Thought Foundation home-page at:

.

================================================================

    ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
    ||  ||||  |      |       |  |      |      |   |   |   |   ||
    |||  ||  ||  |||||  |||  |  |  |||||  ||  |  | |  |  | |  ||
    ||||    |||  ,,,,|      ||  |  |||||  ||  |  |||  |  |||  ||
    |||||  ||||      |  |||  |  |      |      |  |||  |  |||  SM
    ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
    ||  VERICOMM BBS 510.891.0303 / MindNet : vericomm@c2.org ||
    ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||