================================================================
     MindNet Journal - Vol. 1, No. 60
================================================================
     V E R I C O M M / MindNet         "Quid veritas est?"
================================================================

The views and opinions expressed below are not necessarily the
views and opinions of VERICOMM, MindNet, or the editors unless
otherwise noted.

The following is reproduced here with the express permission of
the author.

Permission is given to reproduce and redistribute, for
non-commercial purposes only, provided this information and the
copy remain intact and unedited.

Editor: Mike Coyle 

Assistant Editor: Rick Lawler

Research: Darrell Bross

================================================================

NONCONSENSUAL BRAINWAVE AND PERSONALITY STUDIES BY THE U.S.
GOVERNMENT

By Cheryl Welsh

1996

----------------------------------------------------------------

Nonconsensual U.S. Government Studies

   I am a survivor of ongoing mind control experimentation by
the U.S. government since 1989. I would like to prevent victims
from experiencing much of the pain that I went through by telling
my testimony within the framework of background information and
history on government weapon testing programs, especially
radiation experimentation. I would state the same testimony under
oath in a Congressional hearing or in a court case. I first
learned of microwave harassment and mind control experimentation
from Julianne McKinney, director of the now inactive Electronic
Surveillance Project. This is an overview and does not include
the unsavory details as the point is to recognize the general
pattern of experimentation. It will greatly help your
understanding of this paper if the preceding Research
Possibilities list of reputable newspaper and magazine articles
on behavior control weapons is read first.
   I would challenge the reader to recognize the "plutonium
vitamin pill" of mind control technology before the U.S.
government admits to it's use. This paper is attempting to
describe something that the reader is not familiar with. This is
critical to keep in mind so that this paper will communicate on
the basis of accepted reality.

Background Information and History of Government Experimentation

   The Congressional Record states that the U.S. government had
been involved in mind control experimentation from the 1950s up
to the early 1970s.1 These illegal behavior control experiments
are similar to the documented illegal radiation experiments. The
U.S. government currently denies that there is ongoing classified
behavior control experimentation. This is debatable and in my
opinion will some day be as undeniable as the radiation
experiments are today.
   There were at least 23,000 radiation victims of
institutionalized unethical experimentation.2 There are
similarities between radiation and mind control experimentation
because the government bureaucracy is the same, the groups of
victims are the same and it involves weapon testing. But unlike
the atomic bomb, the U.S. public is not aware of the highly
classified behavior control weapons. This fact contributes to
the difficulty that victims have in exposing the experimentation.
   The purpose of U.S. government research with electromagnetic
frequencies and computer-brain interface technology is to develop
mind control weapons that meet or surpass the enemy's mind
control weapon program, in particular Russia. The U.S. military's
interest in controlling behavior and in using this on it's
enemies in future warfare is well documented.3 The lethal doses
and parameters of radiation were explored and now the limits of
computer-brain interface and EMF technology are explored in the
same unethical way. And by using unwitting victims, experiments
are conducted without limits of human subject experimentation
committees. There are strong indications that electromagnetic
frequency (EMF) behavior control weapons and electronic warfare
has been a classified area of research since at least the 1960s
4, that there are highly classified international agreements to
control it's use, that it is being tested on unwitting human
subjects and that there is an active government program to cover
up the whole situation. Recently, there have been several
articles published on nonlethal weapons, EMF weapons, and mind
control in the U.S.5
   And in the last five years there have been several articles in
mainstream publications about the Russian mind control technology
and EMF.6 And several reliable sources confirm that the cover up
involves government policy such as the CIA refusing to release
this information to the Radiation Advisory Committee. Glenn
Krawczyk wrote in Nexus, Vol. 2, No. 22, Oct-Nov 1994, that the
CIA used a trick of terminology to disguise the development of
microwave weapons in the 1977 Congressional hearings on CIA
behavior control programs and has done the same thing with the
Radiation Advisory Committee in 1994.
   Another example: two top scientists in EMF research have
discussed government harassment. Dr. Puharich, well-known for EMF
and previous government work, described that his house was burned
down and he was shot at for discussing EMF technology and it's
development.7 Dr. Becker, the author of Body Electric on EMF,
also lost government funding and discussed other examples of
harassment by the U.S. government.8
   "The Soft-Kill Fallacy" by Steve Aftergood and Barbara Hatch
Rosenberg in The Bulletin of Atomic Scientist, Sept/Oct 1994 p.
45 stated that discussions under the Certain Conventional Weapons
Convention on electromagnetic weapons, including weapons that
interfere with mental processes and modify behavior and emotional
response, may lead to protocols to control their use. The fact
that behavior control weapons are in the public eye officially
could mean that the government wants to use these weapons and may
not be able to control their use enough to keep the EMF weapons a
secret.

What Mind Control Experimentation Is

   It is probable that classified computer-brain interface
research has had a highly advanced technological leap similar to
the pattern of the development of the atomic bomb weapon program.
Many documented articles support this claim.9 It has been fifty
years since the development of the atomic bomb and there have
been major advancements in science, satellite technology,
computers and information. In my case, mind control
experimentation is the use of military electromagnetic frequency
technology on human subjects in order to develop baseline studies
of the brain, including brainwave studies and the study of
personalities. As in radiation experiments, the lethal doses and
the limits of the technology are explored and the experiments are
inhumane. Mind control experiments are conducted as a result of
development of behavior control weapons and are, like the
radiation experiments, examples of science at it worst. Weapon
testing programs are designed to disable and kill the enemy and
therefore the experiments are also designed to destroy.
   There are over 500 documented cases of victims in the U.S., 1
million alleged victims in Russia and cases in Germany, England,
Canada, Finland, and South America.10 A few of the main
similarities between victims are as follows. Women, prisoners and
mental patients are a few of the powerless groups targeted in
U.S. government experimentation. Most of the victims describe
long term experimentation, some over 30 years. All ages,
socioeconomic and political groups are represented in mind
control experiments.
   This is a wide area of research and there are probably many
umbrella projects to test many different parameters of behavior
control weapons. Government experimentation with behavior control
technology is based on psychological principles of war. For
example, multiple personalities are thought to be caused by
traumatic experiences. To determine how to control and destroy
people, the experiments are designed to reliably create multiple
personalities, (as in Project Monarch)11. Victim's testimony
matches this fact.
   The U.S. government is using mental illness as a cover-up of
mind control experimentation. Many of the experiments are
designed to mimic mental illness. For example, the mental illness
diagnosis manual for psychiatrists states that the mentally ill
patient put unusual meaning or interpretations into normal
objects. The experimenters can engineer visual and audio patterns
and change the amount and timing of any environment in a specific
way to make the victim see what a mentally ill person would see.
In my case, I have videotaped evidence of this effect. A report
by a university statistics professor confirmed an extremely high
amount of red and white cars on two separate occasions when
compared with normal car color populations.12
   With no meaningful evaluation, mental illness is the given
explanation for the million plus victims. The concurrent
development of technology, the U.S. government's history of
involvement in mind control experiments and their motive to
research this area can also strongly support the fact that these
are victims of government experimentation. Further investigation
of this situation is necessary rather than dismissing it as
mental illness.

Radiation and Mind Control Victims: The Same Dilemma

   I and most survivors have not able to obtain help. This is
typical in government cover up situations. And because of the
nature of the technology itself, any efforts to stop the
experimentation can be sabotaged with the mind control technology
itself. I have gone to the police, lawyers, private
investigators, newspapers, magazines, organizations such as the
ACLU, government agencies such as the U.S. Attorney General,
Congressman Glenn, Kennedy, Feinstein, Sharp and more. The
answers vary from "you are crazy"; "you have to know the source
of the experiment and have monitoring equipment evidence"; "we
don't handle cases such as this, it is out of our area of
expertise"; to no reply, or "we are aware of the situation but it
will take years and over $100,000 to pursue in court," and many
other ways of saying no.
   Victims also cannot get around the unavailability of necessary
government documents classified under the National Security Act.
There is documented evidence that the superpowers have developed
mind control weapons and that the use of these weapons are
classified and controlled by the National Security Act. In the
meantime, the government system is failing the mind control
victim in the same way that it failed the radiation victim. I use
what tools that I have, such as research of open literature and
networking, a painfully slow process.
   At this point, none of the victims, singly or as a group have
the funds to stop the experimentation. I do not have the funds
to rent or buy signal analyzers to document signals that the
government would surely cover up or jam. Some victims have
documented some unusual signals, but it is such a small piece of
evidence and is not directly tied to the government source. The
evidence has been ignored or discounted. I am currently
organizing a group of victims to be monitored by experts.
Another group is also organizing.
   Victims work with their meager resources against a formidable
foe. There is only one successful court case of mind control
experimentation against the government and it was settled out of
court. There was small compensation to a few of the victims.13
Until I can document in other more scientific ways, I am
documenting with videotapes and comparing them with normal tapes
or accepted statistics. Then it is evident that certain patterns
in the environment are unusual in timing and amount and
statistically relevant and this is another small piece of the
mind control picture.
   Experts are necessary to verify information for court cases
and Congressional hearings. Videotape evidence and other mind
control experimentation evidence does not directly tie the U.S.
government to my allegation and therefore is not accepted by
courts, congressional hearings, or UN complaints. There are many
other basic and also complicated reasons for the government
system and its failure to help victims in any significant way.
The system obviously needs to be changed.
   By combining relevant facts with the testimony of victims,
the conclusion about mind control experimentation is becoming
clearer. I am networking with close to 75 victims. Based on my
experience, several victim's testimony, and literature on mind
control topics, it is logical to deduce that I am one of many
hundreds of victims. Fortunately, documentation of behavior
control weapons is increasing and the documentation matches
previous and current testimonies of victims. But, so far it is
too little, too late. This is the harsh reality of the situation.
   This is a lengthy description, but certain issues must be
emphasized in order to survive normal skepticism that occurs when
documented facts are missing. Why for example, did radiation
experiments occur after the Nuremburg trials and why is mind
control experimentation occurring in 1995? Reasons include; that
evil such as the Auschwitz experiments did not end with the
Nuremburg trials; that the National Security Act increased the
odds that radiation experiments could occur; and in 1995, there
is no meaningful deterrent for the actions of radiation and mind
control "scientists".

Remedies and Solutions

   Government experimentation is illegal and is an abuse of U.S.
constitutional rights. One solution would be funding that would
match the U.S. government's resources. Or it will take someone
such as Hazel O'Leary of the Department of Energy who called for
an investigation of radiation experimentation14, to start an
investigation of the mind control experiments.
   Another possibility may be an accident in which the technology
is exposed. Or time will pass, such as ten to twenty years, after
which the technology will become public knowledge. Then there
will be enough victims who come forward and protest. It would be
an indication of man's humanity if the mind control scenario
could be changed.
   For further information and networking, I can be reached at
 Comments are appreciated.

Notes:

More Information Upon Request from 

1. Alexander M. Capron, _Human_Experimentation_, (University
Publications of America, 1986), 247.

Excerpt: "Apparently, it was not unusual for such research to
begin with volunteers and then move on to naive subjects. For
example, in 1953 the CIA began a series of highly sensitive
experiments into the use of biological and chemical agents to
alter human behavior, under the general code name, MK-ULTRA. The
areas explored included radiation, electroshock, paramilitary
devices and materials, anthropology, graphology, psychiatry,
psychology, and sociology."

Also: Andrew Weil, _Acid_Dreams:_The_C.I.A.,_L.S.D._and_the_
_Sixties_Rebellion_, by M. Lee and B. Shlain Book reviews,
Nation, 8 Nov. 1986. p 492.

Excerpt: "Lee and Shlain sifted through mountains of heavily
censored reports to piece together the early history of L.S.D...
Meanwhile the U.S. Army toyed with the idea of driving whole
populations insane with hallucinogenic drugs. By the mid-1960s
nearly 1,500 military personnel had taken L.S.D. in tests run by
the Army Chemical Corps."

2. "Radiation Test Involved At Least 23,000," _Seattle_Times_,
Oct.22, 1994, p.A1.

3. Lt.Col David J. Dean USAF, _Low-Intensity_Conflict_and_Modern_
_Technology_ with a forward by Congressman Newt Gingrich, (Air
University Press, Center for Aerospace Doctrine Research and
Education, Maxwell AFB June, 1986)

Excerpt: The Electromagnetic Spectrum in Low-Intensity Conflict by
Capt Paul E. Tyler, MC, USAF:

Potential Military Applications of EMR

The exploitation of this technology for military uses is still in
its infancy and only recently has been recognized by the United
States as a feasible option. A 1982 Air Force review of
biotechnology had this to say: Currently available data allow the
projection that specially generated radio frequency radiation
(RFR) fields may pose powerful and revolutionary antipersonnel
military threats. Electroshock therapy indicates the ability of
induced electric current to completely interrupt mental
functioning for short periods of time, to obtain cognition for
longer periods and to restructure emotional response over
prolonged intervals. Experience with electroshock therapy, RFR
experiments and the increasing understanding of the brain as an
electrically mediated organ suggested the serious probability
that impressed electromagnetic fields can be disruptive to
purposeful behavior and may be capable of directing and or
interrogating such behavior. Further, the passage of
approximately 100 milliamperes through the myocardium can lead to
cardiac standstill and death, again pointing to a speed-of-light
weapons effect. A rapidly scanning RFR system could provide an
effective stun or kill capability over a large area. System
effectiveness will be a function of wave form, field intensity,
pulse widths, repetition frequency, and carrier frequency. The
system can be developed using tissue and whole animal
experimental studies, coupled with mechanisms and waveform
effects research. Using relatively low-level RFR, it may be
possible to sensitize large military groups to extremely
dispersed amounts of biological or chemical agents to which the
unirradiated population would be immune.(1)

4. Joint Hearings before the Senate Select Committee on
Intelligence and the Subcommittee on Health and Scientific
Research of the Senate Committee on Human Resources, Project
MK-ULTRA, The CIA's Program of Research in Behavioral
Modification, 95th Cong., 1st Sess. 75 (1977) Also, Paul Brodeur,
_The_Zapping_of_America_, Toronto edition George J. MacLeod,
1977. Explains the Russian Microwaves on the Moscow U.S. Embassy.
Also, Declassified CIA document, Pulsed Microwave Used for Mind
Control...1974.

5. _Newsweek_, Science of War nonlethal weapons. 7 Feb, 1994.
Also, _Daily_News_, Nonlethal Weapon, 3 Aug, 1994.

Also, _SPIE_REPORTS_ New Technologies Provide Tools For Law
Enforcement Challenges Conference, chair William H. Webster,
9-94.

6. Refer to eight articles under Research Possibilities, this
paper, #1,3,5,6,8,9,10,11.

7. Dr. A. Puharich, Electromagnetic Conference, Sept. 1987, New
York, audiocassette.

Excerpt: "About ten years ago in 1976, no I'm sorry, early 1977,
I made the basic measurements which showed the elf nature of elf
coming from Russia and that it was psychoactive, that was my
finding and I deduced the chemicals that were released by the
frequencies that were being used and I passed that information
onto every intelligence agency we have in this country from the
president on down and England and Canada and all I got was four
years of harassment. My house was burned down, I was shot at,
they tried to kill me, they tried to eliminate me, etc., etc.,
and finally they agreed I was right and in 1981, the U.S.
government went into full scale elf warfare and set up all their
big transmitters down under in Australia and Africa so on and so
on and now their in business and everything's classified and you
can't say a god damned thing about it, a tough situation. And you
can't get any real information out of any government agency. And
I know all of them that do the work. I know the people who head
the projects etc. When they're in trouble, they usually come ask
me. And they classify what I tell them. Insanity."

8. Robert O. Becker,MD and Gary Selden, _The_Body_Electric:_
_Electromagnetism_and_the_Foundation_of_Life_. Wm Morrow &
Company, NY 1985.

9. Dr. Karl H. Pribram,(Stanford Professor, famous for
holograghic theory of the brain), editor, _Rethinking_Neural_
_Networks:_Quantum_Fields_and_Biological_Data_, Lawrence
Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, 1993. p.156-7.

Excerpt: "B. Multiple Personality....Now suppose that the
diabolical training is `extensive', both figuratively and
literally. that is, suppose that it succeeds in placing other
avoidance patterns into a geometry that surrounds and isolates a
large cognitive domain from the rest of the neural network.
Subsequently, wavepackets that form in that domain will be
trapped there, and that domain will then develop a personality
that is distinct from the personality of the exterior domain(s).
But the entrapment is not permanent: Quantum tunneling provides a
mechanism for penetration of the barrier, after which another
distinct personality emerges."

Also, Fox Butterfield, _The_New_York_Times_, $2.15 million for
hidden-weapon research, _Seattle_Post-Intelligencer_, Friday,
March 10, 1995, A3.

Excerpt: "...for the development of new high-technology gun
detectors that would permit the police to spot people carrying
concealed guns on the street or inside stores. "The camera works
because the body naturally emits strong electromagnetic signals
in the millimeter wavelength, said Dr.Richard Huguenin, the
inventor of the device at Millitech Corp."

Also, C.C.Morton, Brain trust, New Recruits, _UC_Davis_Magazine_,
Spring 1994, p.21.

Excerpt: "In the lab of psychology professor Ron Mangun, UC
Davis students serve as research subjects for a technique known
as electrophysiology, in which 64 electrodes dotted on a cloth
cap record electrical impulses from the surface of the head. The
impulses are thought to correspond to cognitive processes inside
the brain. The subjects sit in a sound booth. While one computer
system flashes images, another computer system records the
brain's responses 400 times a second.11

Also, _The_Guardian_, The Future Art of War, 25, May 1995, p. 9.

Excerpt: "Nick Lewer, peace researcher at the University of
Bradford, looks in the latest issue of Medicine and War,..."
"There are plans for `mind control' with the use of
`psycho-correction messages' transmitted by subliminal audio and
visual stimuli. There is also a plan for `psychotronic weapons' -
apparently the projection of consciousness to other locations -
and another to use holographic projection to disseminate
propaganda and misinformation."

Also, The Houston Chronicle, Brainpower, 16, Feb. 1995.

Excerpt: "`Brain-actuated control' is under development at the
Dayton, Ohio, base to help pilots deal with the increasing amount
of information needed to fly modern jets, said Grant McMillan,
director of Patterson's biocybernetics lab. Eventually, pilots
may be able to control flight using only their minds, he added.
With biofeedback, in which changes in the brain are portrayed on
screens, volunteers learn how to control the electrical activity
created by their thought processes. Scalp monitors pick up the
electrical signals, and a computer translates them into
mechanical commands."

10. Association of National Security Alumni, Electronic
Surveillance Project Julianne McKinney, Director. Not in
existence at present. Over 100 victims in 1993.

International Committee For the Convention Against Offensive
Microwave Weapons P.O. Box 58700 Philadelphia, PA 19102-8700.
Tel: (215) 893-9505. Harlan Girard, Director. Over 500 victims in
1995.

Freedom of Thought Foundation, P.O. Box 35072 Tucson, AZ 85740
Walter Bowart, Founder. Over 150 survivors in 1995.

Mediacco, Director, Robert Naeslund P.O. Box 136, 11479
Stockholm, Sweden. Implant victims and mind control.

Canadian Stone Angels, Director, Lynne Moss-Sharman 369 Pearl St.
Apt 2, Thunder Bay, Ontario, P7B 1A9,
Masonic/military/medical/mind control victims.

Ecology And Living Environment, A Russian environmental and civil
liberties group, Moscow, 500 members. Set up an association of
"Victims of Psychotronic Experimentation, President, Emilia
Cherkova," No address. From: Owen Matthews," Report: Soviets Used
Top Secret `Psychotronic' Weapons," _The_Moscow_Times_, 11, Jul.,
1995, Section No 750.

11. Walter Bowart, _Operation_Mind_Control_. Flatland Editions
1978, 1994.

12. Letter from Jessica Utts, Professor of Statistics University
of California, Davis October 18, 1995 to Cheryl Welsh.

Excerpt: "...For whatever reason the color distributions at the
two locations do not appear to be statistically equivalent. In
other words, if the cars at both locations were considered to be
randomly sampled from the same population of cars, discrepancies
in color as extreme as those you have observed, or more so, would
only occur with probability 0.0004. Most statisticians would
conclude, based on this number, that the populations from which
the two sets of cars were sampled were different in terms of
color distribution. ..."

13. Refer to Research Possibilities, this paper, #5.

14. Stephen Budiansky, Erica E. Good & Ted Gest, "U.S. News
Investigative Report" _U.S._News_&_World_Report_, 24, Jan.
1994, p. 34. "Orlikow v. U.S., filed in 1979, was settled in
1988 for $750,000." It was settled out of court and split among
the several defendents.

15. Melissa Healy, _Los_Angeles_Times_, "Energy chief says U.S.
owes radiation victims," _The_Sacramento_Bee_ final 29 Dec. 1993.
p A1.

Excerpt: "Under O'Leary, the department has vowed to `come clean'
on the secrets of nuclear testing. Her department and a special
panel of doctors, lawyers and department aides she has named are
investigating dozens and possibly hundreds of
government-sponsored experiments in which humans were subjected
to radiation."

----------------------------------------------------------------
MindNet Journal Archive Filename: [mn160.txt]
================================================================

To receive the MindNet Journal via email:

Send message: [subscribe mindnet] to: .

To unsubscribe:

Send message: [unsubscribe mindnet] to: .

Back issues of the MindNet Journal are available at our
FTP Archive site:

 [/pub/users/vericomm/mindnet/]

MindNet Journal Publication Index: [mnindex.txt]

Submission of articles for publication within the MindNet
Journal on the subjects of mind control, directed-energy
weapons, non-lethal weapons, ritual abuse, UFO abductions,
bioelectromagnetics, hypnosis, and other related topics
will be accepted with the author's statement of permission
to publish. The editor reserves the right to accept or
reject for publication. The publisher disclaims all
responsibility to return unsolicited matter. Send articles
for submission to:

, or VERICOMM BBS 510.891.0303, or VERICOMM,
POB 32314, Oakland, CA 94604-2314 USA.

VERICOMM / MindNet and its agents disclaim any and all
responsibility or liability for any and all claims and/or
guarantees, express or implied, and delivery of products,
merchandise, and/or services offered for sale by
advertisers and/or authors within the MindNet Journal.

The MindNet mailing list is owned and maintained by Mike Coyle,
, VERICOMM / MindNet, POB 32314 Oakland, CA
94604-2314 USA.

The MindNet Journal is published by VERICOMM / MindNet in
cooperation with the Freedom Of Thought Foundation, POB 35072,
Tucson, AZ 85740-5072 USA.

================================================================

||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
||||  ||||  |      |       |  |      |      |   |   |   |   ||||
|||||  ||  ||  |||||  |||  |  |  |||||  ||  |  | |  |  | |  ||||
||||||    |||  ,,,,|      ||  |  |||||  ||  |  |||  |  |||  ||||
|||||||  ||||      |  |||  |  |      |      |  |||  |  |||  sm||
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
||||||||||||  VERICOMM / MindNet : MindNet@c2.org  |||||||||||||
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||