"This was the moment when the rise of the oceans
began to slow and our planet began to heal"
Barack Hussein Obama
|
|
|
|
event |
description |
Obama's Civilian National Security Force |
A little-publicized Department of Defense Directive (Number
1404.10) establishes a "DoD Civilian Expeditionary Workforce" and
rescinds a prior directive dealing with the emergency use of civilian
personnel.
The new 1404.10, dated January 23, 2009 -- just three
days after the inauguration -- is effective immediately,
and cancels the prior directive of the same designation
("Emergency-Essential (E-E) DoD U.S. Citizen Civilian Employees"), that
was issued in 1992 under President Clinton. The 1992 directive
specifically deals with overseas deployments of civilian personnel, and
mentions the term "overseas" no fewer than 33 times.
The new
directive does not mention the term "overseas" in the body of the
directive even once. The word "overseas" appears in the new
Directive 4 times: once as as a reference; once to describe a database
"code"; once to describe the code values; and once in the Glossary.
In other words, the new Directive doesn't apply to the overseas
deployment of civilians at all, but applies to their deployment in the
United States mainland.
The previous Directive does not mention "restoration
of order" or "stability operations."
These operations are prominently featured in the new directive. In
fact, these functions are central to the mission of Obama's new DoD
Civilian Expeditionary Workforce:
Members of the DoD Civilian
Expeditionary Workforce shall be organized, trained, cleared, equipped,
and ready to deploy in support of combat operations by the military;
contingencies; emergency operations; humanitarian missions; disaster
relief; restoration of order; drug interdiction; and stability
operations of the Department of Defense in accordance with DoDD
3000.05...
While the directive suggest that the DoD will
seek volunteers, Section 4 (d), subsection {e} paragraph 2 states:
Management retains the authority to direct
and assign civilians either voluntarily, involuntarily, or on an
unexpected basis to accomplish the DoD mission.
This new directive is odd, coming as it does after campaign promises
by Obama to establish a paramilitary "civilian national security force
that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded" as our
military (video).
Obama’s Chief of Staff Rahm Emmanuel wrote the following in his 2006
book, "The Plan: Big Ideas for America":
"It’s time for a real
Patriot Act that brings out the patriot in all of us. We propose
universal civilian service for every young American. Under this
plan, all Americans between the ages of 18 and 25 will be asked to serve
their country by going through three months of basic training, civil
defense preparation and community service."
Here's a
video of Rahmbo
describing his mandatory civil service plan to NY Daily News reporter
Ben Smith in 2006. This notion was
detailed in Emanuel's book, co-authored by
Bruce Reed.
This bunch has been thinking about this "force" for a long
time. As previously documented in these pages, Obama has been
actively organizing and training the cadre for his "Civilian National
Security Force" since 1993. Here
are the frightening details.
I worked around the federal government a lot and this Directive is
all about funding. The language and the mission can be changed in
a heartbeat. |
No Nukes |
If he has his way, Obama will
dramatically change the nuclear weapons policy of the U.S. --
leaving behind Cold War doctrine and looking to a model of a minimal
nuclear arsenal -- just ominous enough to do the job of deterrence.
Foreign nations, friend and foe, are poised to discover Obama’s
nuclear agenda, while some critics within the U.S. are fearful that he
will go too far, too fast.
Among the weighty decisions on
Obama’s plate is whether to extend or renegotiate the Strategic Arms
Reduction Treaty (START II) with Russia, which run outs at the end of
2009, and whether to press for ratification of the Comprehensive Nuclear
Test Ban Treaty (CTBT) -- with which the U.S. only voluntarily complies.
The CTBT bans all nuclear explosions in all environments, for
military testing or civilian purposes.
"This is not just a
decision about the future of U.S. nuclear weapons, but about how the
United States will address the challenges of … nuclear terrorism,
nuclear proliferation and our entire 21st-century nuclear strategy,"
Clark Murdock, a senior adviser at the Center for Strategic and
International Studies, told USA Today.
During the campaign,
Obama pledged: "As president, I will set a new direction in nuclear
weapons policy and show the world that America believes in its existing
commitment under the nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT) to work to
ultimately eliminate all nuclear weapons."
Obama’s pledge of no
new nukes for the U.S. is wholly impractical say experts who have
examined not only the issue of maintaining the hardware of nuclear
deterrence, but the human factor of keeping competent trained managers
at the nation’s nuclear switch.
The new Administration has
declared without equivocation that Obama, "will stop the development of
new nuclear weapons."
Frank Gaffney of the Washington-based
Center for Security Policy points to the work of that think tank’s "New
Deterrent Working Group," which is charged to provide input to the
nation’s Strategic Posture Commission.
"We must adopt anew a
national commitment to design, test and produce, on a continuing basis,
new nuclear weapons. These activities are 'performance arts.'
Expertise can be maintained only by engaging in them. Simply put,
the extreme complexity and hazards of the work are such that there is no
substitute for competent, integrated management. Such management,
in turn, requires continuing, hands-on experience."
Bottom line
to the group’s argument: the U.S. can’t even maintain a shaky status quo
by simply nursing along its dusty degrading inventory of nukes.
Yet this is exactly what Obama seems to favor. |
Obama's Despotic Act |
Alan Keyes, a 2008 presidential candidate who now is a plaintiff
in one of the many lawsuits seeking to verify whether Barack Obama
qualifies under the U.S. Constitution's requirements to occupy the Oval
Office,
says the tactics adopted by lawyers for the president confirm there
is an issue for the courts to investigate.
Keyes, who was the
candidate of the American Independent Party, cited a recent exchange
with lawyers representing Obama in which they warned they might seek
monetary penalties against those raising the question of Obama's
eligibility under the Constitution's requirement that the president be a
"natural born" citizen.
"It confirms the common sense suspicion
that he won't act forthrightly in this matter because he has something
to hide."
Keyes writes, "In effect, the courts are refusing to
admit plaintiffs on this matter into the courtroom, thereby denying them
justice. Madison wrote, 'Justice is the end of government.
It is the end of civil society. It will be pursued either until it
be obtained or until liberty be lost in the pursuit.'"
"The
denial of justice is thus a despotic act that violates the basis not
only of just government, but of civil society itself."
Obama
voluntarily placed himself in the position of being asked to provide his
information, he said.
"Given the Constitutional requirement, the
only fact citizens need to justify their suit is the fact that Obama ran
for president. He asked to be chosen, and therefore must answer
the eligibility question," Keyes wrote,
"In the final analysis
if the courts refuse to respect the Constitution, they are not the
judges of their own action. The people must ultimately decide.
Which is why I and others will use every outlet to inform them of the
injustice being done not just to individuals but to the sovereign people
as a whole," Keyes said. |
Obama's Agents At FactCheck.org |
I was recently engaged in an exchange of emails with my buddy Fred
Nerks from Oz that prompted me to revisit FactCheck.org, where the
Annenberg-funded website has published a
web page entitled, "The truth about Obama's birth certificate."
The information on this page is 100% bovine excrement.
FactCheck.org's Summary
1. "In June, the Obama campaign
released a digitally scanned image of his birth certificate..."
This statement is false -- the campaign released a digitally scanned "Certification
of Live Birth." The document presented on this website is not now and
never has been a birth certificate, and FactCheck.org knows it. So
why did they publish this lie?
2. "FactCheck.org
staffers have now seen, touched, examined and photographed the original
birth certificate."
This statement is also a lie --
the only people that have seen, touched, and examined Obama's birth
certificate is Chiyome Leinaala Fuikino M.D., the Director of the Hawaii
Department of Health, and the
Registrar of Vital Statistics.
Fuikino wrote, "There have
been numerous requests for Sen. Barack Hussein Obama’s official birth
certificate. State law (Hawai'i Revised Statutes §338-18)
prohibits the release of a certified birth certificate to persons who do
not have a tangible interest in the vital record."
So your
conclusion, "We conclude that..." is false, because your conclusions are
based on a false premise -- that you have seen Obama's birth certificate
-- you haven't, because the State of Hawaii won't release it. What
do you think is going on in the 48 lawsuits against Obama. These
suits are all trying to get to Obama's birth certificate and 48 times,
judges have said, "I can't go for that, ohh, no, I can't go for that."
3. "Update, Nov. 1: The director of
Hawaii’s Department of Health confirmed Oct. 31 that Obama was born in
Honolulu."
Complete fabrication and bold-faced lie --
what Fuikino wrote was, "Therefore, I as Director of Health for the
State of Hawai'i, along with the Registrar of Vital Statistics who has
statutory authority to oversee and maintain these type of vital records,
have personally seen and verified that the Hawai'i State Department of
Health has Sen. Obama’s original birth certificate on record in
accordance with state policies and procedures."
Nowhere in that
statement does it say Obama was born in Honolulu, and
here is
the complete statement: -- check it out yourself.
And,
nowhere does FactCheck.org identify the militantly partisan website that
released the "Certification of Live Birth" -- The Daily Kos -- one of
the wackiest websites extant. This FACT alone makes this entire
scenario suspicious, if not patently ridiculous.
FactCheck.org's Analysis
1. FactCheck.org's own analysis
confirms what I wrote above, under Summary.
2.
FactCheck.org presents a photo of a
"Certification of Live Birth," captioned, "The Obama birth certificate,
held by FactCheck writer Joe Miller."
That's a lie,
as well -- the document in this photo is a "Certification of Live Birth"
(getting tiresome, isn't it) -- not a birth certificate. They are
different documents, and the folks at this mendacious organization
know the difference -- Joseph Goebbels would be proud of FactCheck.org's
big lie.
FactCheck.org presents a photo image of the document
further down the page, under Analysis -- That document is not a "birth
certificate." It is a "Certification of Live Birth," again,
FactCheck.org knowingly misrepresents the document as something it is
not, and it's not even the document that was released.
Here is the document that was released to The Daily Kos. The
original document released had its Certificate Number blacked out -- and
if one looks at the document, it says at the bottom, "ANY ALTERATIONS
INVALIDATE THIS CERTIFICATE" -- even if the document were genuine -- it
isn't VALID.
The biggest point is that the document FactCheck.org
is proferring as a genuine birth certificate is, in fact, an altered
computer printout. It's a completely bogus document.
3. FactCheck.org
published several other images defending its false presentation on this
page.
4. In late
July, a researcher looking to dig up dirt on Obama instead found a birth
announcement that had been published in the Honolulu Advertiser on
Sunday, Aug. 13, 1961.
A birth announcement could
have been easily phoned in to the newspaper from anywhere in the world.
This "fact" is inconclusive, unless you know who provided the newspaper
with the announcement, the means they used, and where they were
physically located at the time.
FactCheck.org's Anal-ists
FactCheck.org
identifies their anal-ists as Jess Henig and Joe Miller. OK,
that's fine, but who and what are Jess Henig and Joe Miller? Are
they qualified to make an analysis of ANY document, or are they just a
couple of guys hanging around FactCheck.org's office, or are they
political operators? What are their bona fides?
FactCheck.org doesn't say. Wonder why?
Well, I found out.
The two FactCheck.org employees who were granted access to Obama's
C.O.L.B. are NOT document experts.
Joe Miller has a Ph. D. in Political Philosophy -- so he's a
political operative -- while
Jess
Henig has an M.A. in English Literature -- I'm not sure her dye-job
is a political or esthetic statement. Clicking the links
will display their photos -- just what you'd expect.
Jess took
the photos and did all of the writing while Joe basically held the COLB
open for Jess to shoot it.
Those two
are completely unqualified to perform any kind of forensic examination
of the COLB document, and FactCheck.org knows it -- so do they.
FactCheck does say
their, "representatives got a chance to spend some time with the birth
certificate, and we can attest to the fact that it is real and
three-dimensional and resides at the Obama headquarters in Chicago."
In my mind, that clearly shows they were working with and for the Obama
Campaign and that Obama and his people are involved in this lie.
Lie? Hell, this is a conspiracy and FactCheck.org boldly admits
their part in it.
I prefer to give credence to Dr. Ron Polarik,
who holds a Ph.D. in Instructional Media and specializes in computer
graphics with over 20 years experience with computers, printers and
typewriters, who provides conclusive and irrefutable evidence that the
Certificate of Live Birth (COLB) image created and distributed by
Obama's campaign to the Daily Kos, Annenberg's Factcheck, and the St.
Petersburg Times, and Politifact, is, unquestionably, a false
identification document.
Here, is his final report.
A second expert forensic document
examiner Ms. Sandra Ramsey Lines has filed an
affidavit associated with one of the lawsuits, stating the
following:
1. I am Sandra Ramsey Lines, With an address at...
I am a former federal examiner and law enforcement officer. I
began training as a forensic document examiner in 1991. I am a
Certified Diplomat of Forensic Sciences, a member of the American
Society of Questioned Document Examiners, a member of the Southwestern
Association of Forensic Document Examiners, and a member of the
Questioned Document Subcommittee of the American Society of Testing and
Materials. My background and credentials are set forth in Exhibit
I attached hereto.
2. I have reviewed the attached
affidavit posted on the internet from "Ron Polarik." After my
review and based on my years of experience, I can state with certainty
that the COLB presented on the internet by the various groups, which
include the "Daily Kos," the Obama Campaign, "Factcheck.org" and others
cannot be relied upon as genuine.
My Comments
Since the title of the FactCheck.org web page is, "The truth about
Obama's birth certificate," everything on the page is a bold-faced lie,
because FactCheck.org has never, ever seen Obama's birth certificate and
every image and reference on their page is to a Certification of Live
Birth -- and they refer to it a "birth certificate" every time.
Hawaii is notorious for its issuance of COLB's.
Click
here to
see a large copy of a beautifully printed Certificate of Hawaiian Birth
(If you click it, it will get bigger or smaller). It belongs to
Sun Yat-Sen, the Father of Modern China, who was born in China.
This Certificate of Hawaiian Birth, dated March 14, 1904, was
issued after Dr. Sun signed a
raggedy type-written statement affirming that he was born in Hawaii
on Nov. 24, 1870. Sun Yat-sen was born on November 12, 1866, to a
peasant family in the village of Cuiheng, Xiangshan county , Guangzhou
prefecture, Guangdong province (26 km or 16 miles north of Macau), not
Hawaii, as this document affirms.
Maya Soetoro-Ng,
Obama's sister is reputed to have a Hawaiian Certification of Live Birth too, and she
was born in Jakarta, Indonesia.
None of this is
surprising, since FactCheck.org is funded by
the Annenberg Foundation, who
funded Obama's buddy, the unrepentant domestic terrorist Bill Ayers,
who, in turn, hired Barack Obama. They represent themselves as unbiased and non-partisan. That, of course,
is just another lie.
This "birth certificate" controversy is
in addition to the fact that
Obama is not a "natural born citizen." There's at least
two reasons Obama shouldn't be in the Oval Office, election fraud and
his constitutional ineligibility.
"To tell deliberate lies while
genuinely believing in them, to forget any fact that has become
inconvenient, and then when it becomes necessary again, to draw it back
from oblivion for just so long as it is needed..."
George Orwell,
"Nineteen Eighty-Four" |
Saint Obama |
A San Francisco novelty store is
featuring a large display window of "Saint Obama" candles. The
candles feature Obama's head atop the body of St. Martin de Porres, a
Peruvian-born Dominican friar, who became one of the first black saints
in the Americas upon his canonization in 1962.
St. Martin de
Porres was born to a white and a black parent, and is considered to be
the patron saint of people of mixed racial heritage. |
©
Copyright Beckwith 2009
All right reserved
|