| 
					
						
							| 
				
							 
							  
							 
							From $1 trillion in debtto $4 trillion in debt
 in six weeks
 
 |  
							| 
							
							 
							
 |  
						| 
							
 
 
  
 |    | 
	
		| event | description |  
		| Comandante Obama | "But you don't understand," 
		the Colombian 
		said.  "We've seen this before." 
 "He's right, my 
		good friend," the Cuban said.  "We Latin Americans know the pattern.  
		Believe me we do."
 
 The American tried to shrug off the Latin Americans' warning.  To his 
		consternation, he found that he couldn't.  Peron, Fidel, now Chavez, they 
		insisted.  The emergence of misrule, corruption and economic stagnation 
		in Latin American nations follows a particular sequence or progression.  Now the sequence was unfolding in the United States.
 
 "It starts 
		with a cult of personality," the Cuban explained.  "One man declares 
		himself the jefe, the caudillo, the big leader."
 
 Had Obama 
		attempted to instigate something like a cult of personality?  The 
		American found the charge impossible to refute.  During the campaign, 
		Obama had failed to advance a genuine agenda, instead campaigning on 
		"hope" and "change."  In effect, he had asked Americans to turn the 
		nation over to him on blind faith.  He would, he promised, transcend 
		racial and partisan divides in his very person.
 
 The One had 
		thrived, moreover, on addressing vast gatherings.  In Berlin, he had 
		addressed a quarter of a million Germans.  At the Democratic convention, 
		he had given his acceptance speech not in a convention hall before a few 
		thousand supporters, but in a stadium before 80,000.  In some subtle but 
		palpable way, the American had to admit, Obama had transgressed our 
		political tradition.  He had reduced his supporters to facelessness.
 
 And to an astonishing extent, the American had to grant, the 
		elites -- Congress, academics, the mainstream media -- had proved only too 
		willing to place themselves in thrall to Obama.  On Feb. 17, for example, 
		the president had signed an $800 billion "stimulus" bill, at least 
		three-quarters of which was devoted not to stimulus but to political 
		payoffs.  Less than a week later, he had hosted a White House "summit" on 
		fiscal responsibility.  Had the press noted the contrast?  Had it 
		objected?  The very idea.
 
 Let George W. Bush mispronounce a word, 
		and the press would howl for a month.  Let Obama offend against 
		language itself -- let him suggest that he signed perhaps the most 
		reckless fiscal act in American history as an instance of "fiscal 
		responsibility," engaging in an almost Orwellian example of 
		doublespeak -- and the press utters scarcely a murmur.
 
 "After the 
		cult of personality," the Colombian explained, "what comes next is 
		nationalization."  Fidel had nationalized the Cuban sugar mills, Chavez 
		the Banco de Venezuela, Morales the Bolivian oil and gas industries.
 
 |  
		| It's Obama's Crisis Now | You might have missed 
		it, but a key moment in Barack Obama's young presidency 
		occurred 
		Wednesday afternoon as he began his trip to California to become the 
		first sitting president to appear on a late-night comedy show.  
		Heading for his helicopter, Obama made a statement about the AIG 
		bonuses, and he didn't use the word "inherited," as in "we inherited 
		this crisis." 
 "Ultimately, I'm responsible, I'm the president of 
		the United States," Obama told reporters.  "The buck stops with 
		me."  That makes it official: Barack Obama didn't start the 
		financial crisis, but he owns it now.
 
 Before anyone gives the 
		president an award for political courage, remember that provisions 
		regarding the bonuses -- and who knows what else -- were buried deep 
		inside the $787 billion economic stimulus bill that Obama and his fellow 
		Democrats rushed through Congress.  Every single Republican in the 
		House voted against it, and all but three GOP senators did the same.  
		There's no way Obama can blame the stimulus, and its contents, on anyone 
		other than himself.
 
 "What's beginning to happen is his actions 
		are starting to have consequences," a Republican pollster told me.  
		"And this is one of those.  He hurried everybody through that 
		process, and it's now his actions that are causing things that people 
		are unhappy about."
 |  
		| Stop The Insanity | Obama's budget would 
		produce $9.3 trillion in deficits over the next decade, more than
		
		four times the deficits of George W. Bush's presidency, 
		congressional auditors said Friday. 
 The new Congressional Budget 
		Office figures offered a far more dire outlook for Obama's budget than 
		the new administration predicted just last month -- a deficit $2.3 
		trillion worse.  It's a prospect even the president's own budget 
		director called unsustainable.
 
 In his White House run, Obama 
		assailed the economic policies of his predecessor, but his eye-popping 
		deficit numbers threaten to swamp his Marxist agenda of socializing 
		health care, bankrupting the energy industry, and enacting scores of 
		left-wing domestic programs.
 
 The dismal deficit figures, if they 
		prove to be accurate, inevitably raise the prospect that Obama and his 
		Democratic allies controlling Congress would have to consider raising 
		taxes after the recession ends or else pare back his agenda.
 
 By 
		CBO's calculation, Obama's budget would generate 
		deficits averaging almost $1 trillion a year of red ink over 2010-2019.
 
 Worst of all, CBO says the deficit under Obama's policies would 
		never go below 4 percent of the size of the economy, figures that 
		economists agree are unsustainable.  By the end of the decade, the 
		deficit would exceed 5 percent of gross domestic product, a dangerously 
		high level.
 
 "I think deficits of 5 percent (of GDP) are 
		unsupportable," said economist Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody's 
		Economy.com.  "It will lead to higher interest rates to the point 
		where it will force policymakers to make changes."
 
 White House budget chief Peter 
		Orszag said that CBO's long-range economic projections are more 
		pessimistic than those of the White House. but, remember, the CBO has 
		been in business for many years -- Orszag has been in business 8 weeks 
		(and is an Obot) -- who are you going to believe?
 |  
		| Priorities | After getting his usual White House briefing on the 
		world's problems, Obama 
		headed to Camp David for a long weekend with his 
		family. 
 His daughters Sasha and Malia have 
		begun their spring break, and to spend more time with the girls and 
		first lady, the president is skipping a Washington tradition, Saturday 
		night's Gridiron Club dinner.
 
 A weekend off in the middle of the worst economic crisis 
		in generations and Obama goes on "spring break."  Well, it is "March Madness," and Obama does have his priorities.  Can't watch the games if 
		you're running the country.
 |  
		| Witch Hunt | Bankers on Wall Street and in 
		Europe have 
		struck back against moves by US lawmakers to slap punitive 
		taxes on bonuses paid to high earners at bailed-out institutions. 
 Senior executives on both sides of the Atlantic on Friday warned of 
		an exodus of talent from some of the biggest names in US finance, saying 
		the "anti-American" measures smacked of "a McCarthy witch-hunt" that 
		would send the country "back to the stone age."
 
 There were fears 
		that the backlash triggered by AIG’s payment of $165m in bonuses to 
		executives responsible for losses that forced a $170bn taxpayer-funded 
		rescue would have devastating consequences for the largest banks.
 
 "Finance is one of America’s great industries, and they’re 
		destroying it," said one banker at a firm that has accepted public 
		money.  "This happened out of haste and anger over AIG, but we’re 
		not like AIG."
 
 The banker added: "It’s like a McCarthy 
		witch-hunt...This is the most profoundly anti- American thing I’ve ever 
		seen."
 
 Not to mention 
		that these measures are probably unconstitutional.
 |  
		| Iran Ignores Obama | The Iranian government 
		brushed aside a 
		Persian New Year's message on March 20th, from Obama, offering to resolve 
		years of hostility, saying it wants concrete change from Washington 
		before it's ready to enter a dialogue. 
 Obama released the video to 
		coincide with the major Iranian festival of Nowruz, a 12-day holiday 
		that marks the arrival of spring and the beginning of the new year on 
		the Persian calendar.  In the video, which has Farsi subtitles, 
		Obama said the U.S. is prepared to end the strained relations if Tehran 
		tones down its combative rhetoric.
 
 President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad 
		also has said Iran would welcome talks with the U.S., but only if there 
		was mutual respect.  Iranian officials say that means Washington 
		must stop accusing Iran of seeking to build nuclear weapons and 
		supporting terrorism.
 
 On Friday, an Ahmadinejad adviser played down Obama's video, saying 
		"minor changes will not end the differences" between Tehran and 
		Washington.
 
 "Obama has talked of change but has taken no 
		practical measures to address America's past mistakes in Iran.  If 
		Mr. Obama takes concrete actions and makes fundamental changes in U.S. 
		foreign policy toward other nations including Iran, the Iranian 
		government and people will not turn their back on him," press adviser 
		Ali Akbar Javanfekr told the state-run English-language Press TV 
		satellite station.
 
 Transcript of Obama's appeal -- amplified by images.
 
 There was a female Iranian 
		expatriate on FOX News last night who said Obama’s appeal would be 
		interpreted as a surrender.  She implied that had Obama delivered 
		this message in person the Mullahs would have taken turns mounting him.
 |  
		| Tampering? | Dr. Orly Taitz, a California attorney battling on a 
		number of fronts to obtain documentation of Barack Obama's eligibility 
		to be president is asking the FBI and U.S. Secret Service to investigate 
		suspected "tampering" at the U.S. Supreme Court. 
 She says the 
		issue of Obama's eligibility to meet the Constitution's demand for a 
		"natural born" president has been before the Supreme Court at least four 
		times.
 
 But she wonders whether the justices actually were given 
		the pleadings to review.
 
 "I believe … that there was tampering 
		with documents and records by employees of the Supreme Court and the 
		justices never saw those briefs," she alleges in a letter to the FBI's 
		Robert Mueller, the Secret Service's Mark Sullivan and Attorney General 
		Eric Holder.
 
 Taitz raises questions about "forgery of court 
		records, tampering with court records, cyber crime, erasing of court 
		records from the docket, fraud, mail fraud, wire fraud and other related 
		crimes."
 
 Specifically, she points to the handling of her own 
		case, Lightfoot v. Bowen, which was submitted to the Supreme Court on an 
		emergency basis.  Although it was scheduled for a conference, no 
		hearing ever was held.
 
 Taitz notes that references to the case 
		were erased from the docket of the Supreme Court on Jan. 21, shortly 
		after Obama, the defendant, met with 
		eight of the nine justices behind closed doors.
 
 It happened 
		just two days before her case was scheduled to be reviewed in 
		conference.
 
 More . . .
 |  ![]()
 © 
				 Copyright  Beckwith  2009All right reserved
 
 |