| 
					
						
							| 
				
							 
							  
							 
							From $1 trillion in debtto $4 trillion in debt
 in six weeks
 
 |  
							| 
							
							 
							
 |  
						| 
							
 
 
  
 |    | 
	
		| event | description |  
		| The New World Economy The End Of America | Obama 
		supports the Copenhagen Accord, the successor to the Kyoto Treaty, if, 
		in the words of a U.S. State Department spokesman, it can come up with 
		an "effective framework" for dealing with global warming. 
 A 
		United Nations document on "climate change" that will be 
		distributed to 
		a major environmental conclave next week envisions a huge reordering of 
		the world economy, likely involving trillions of dollars in wealth 
		transfer, millions of job losses and gains, new taxes, industrial 
		relocations, new tariffs and subsidies, and complicated payments for 
		greenhouse gas abatement schemes and carbon taxes -- all under the 
		supervision of the world body.
 
 In the stultifying language that 
		is normal for important U.N. conclaves, the negotiators are known as the 
		"Ad Hoc Working Group On Further Commitments For Annex I Parties Under 
		the Kyoto Protocol."  Yet the consequences of their negotiations, if 
		enacted, would be nothing short of world-changing.
 
 Getting that 
		deal done has become the United Nations' highest priority, and the Bonn 
		meeting is seen as a critical step along the path to what the U.N. calls 
		an "ambitious and effective international response to climate change," 
		which is intended to culminate at the later gathering in Copenhagen.
 
 The paper makes no effort to calculate the magnitude of the costs 
		and disruption involved, but despite the discreet presentation, makes 
		clear that they will reverberate across the entire global economic 
		system.
 
 Experts have been much more blunt about the draconian 
		nature of the measures they deem necessary to make "effective" 
		greenhouse gas reductions.
 
 In an influential but highly 
		controversial paper called "Key Elements of a Global Deal on Climate 
		Change," British economist Nicholas Lord Stern, formerly a high British 
		Treasury official, has declared that industrial economies would need to 
		cut their per capita carbon dioxide emissions by "at least 80% by 2050," 
		while the biggest economies, like the U.S.'s, would have to make cuts of 
		90 percent.
 
 Stern also calls for "immediate and binding" 
		reduction targets for developed nations of 20 percent to 40 percent by 
		2020.
 
 To meet Stern's 2050 goals, he says, among other things, 
		"most of the world's electricity production will need to have been 
		decarbonized."
 
 Wow!  
		"The U.S would have to make cuts of 90 percent."  The United 
		Nations wants America to revert to the water wheel and windmill.
 
 Obama must be thrilled.  With the stroke of a pen, he will do to 
		America what Hitler, Tojo, Stalin and the rest failed to do with their 
		armies.
 |  
		| Obama's Education Reform | Obama
		
		says the best way to improve the nation's education system is with 
		more money and more reform. 
 Answering questions at the first 
		online town hall from the White House, Obama said Thursday that greater 
		investment in early childhood education and rewarding talented teachers 
		would significantly improve the system.
 
 Well, finally, 
		Obama is addressing something he knows about -- "education reform."
 
 From 1995 to 1999, Obama served as co-chair of the 
		Chicago Annenberg Challenge (CAC) -- his partner was the  
		unrepentant terrorist Bill Ayers,
 
 Obama became the leader of an 
		ambitious project to remake (Change?) the public schools of Chicago.  This was a 
		big test for him.  It was his chance to bring hope and 
		change to the mostly minority inner city school children trapped in 
		Chicago schools.
 
 The "Small Schools" movement was heavily funded 
		by CAC.  The program focused on individual schools built around specific 
		political themes to push students to "confront issues of inequity, war, 
		and violence."
 
 The teacher 
		education programs served as "sites of resistance" to an oppressive 
		system.
 
 The point, said Ayers in his "Teaching Toward Freedom," 
		is to "teach against oppression" -- against America's history of evil and 
		racism, thereby forcing social transformation.
 
 Well, Obama 
		flopped big time.  He squandered $110 million (including over $60 million 
		in public funds) and the time of many public employees on a project that 
		yielded no discernable result.
 
 The Final Technical Report of the 
		Chicago Annenberg Research Project is 
		available.  From its 
		abstract:
 
 "Results suggest that among the schools it supported, the Challenge 
		had little impact on school improvement and student outcomes, with no 
		statistically significant differences between Annenberg and 
		non-Annenberg schools in rates of achievement gain, classroom behavior, 
		student self-efficacy, and social competence."
 
 The students 
		didn't improve academically, but they are all now ACORN workers and 
		doing their best to destroy an evil, racist, warmongering America.  
		So, from Obama and Ayer's perspective, the project was a total success.
 
 Now, Obama wants to nationalize his program, so all of America's 
		children can learn about America's history of evil and racism -- thereby 
		forcing social transformation -- and he's going to use your tax dollars 
		to do it.
 |  
		| A Real "Shadow" Government | A lawyer 
		spearheading the effort in Washington state to bring light to the issue 
		of Barack Obama's eligibility to be president says he was 
		shadowed all 
		day today by officers with the federal Department of Homeland Security, 
		the Snohomish County sheriff's office and the Everitt city police 
		department. 
 "There's definitely observation," attorney 
		Stephen Pidgeon said.  "Maybe observation in anticipation of making an arrest."
 
 Pidgeon said he contacted his personal defense attorney, and 
		also was in contact with the 
		Alliance Defense Fund, a national 
		organization advocating for civil liberties and religious and personal 
		freedoms.
 
 Pidgeon is affiliated with the organization and told 
		WND that there would be a letter sent inquiring about the surveillance.
 
 He said he first became aware of the situation when his wife 
		left their rural home early in the day and reported there were three law 
		enforcement vehicles parked nearby, along with three black 
		Suburban-style vehicles carrying camouflage-wearing agents, apparently 
		from Homeland Security.  He said when he left his home, he had a 
		sheriff's vehicle "marking every turn that I made.  There's definitely 
		observation."
 
 Pidgeon said he has been "outspoken" about the 
		Obama administration and its validity due to the eligibility questions, 
		but didn't realize he was "qualifying as an enemy of the state."
 
 He immediately reached out to a number of individuals through 
		e-mail.  "My only protection is to contact the people I know.  We are definitely under surveillance and it's coordinated with 
		Homeland Security," he said.
 
 Later in the day, he said one of his associates had 
		been followed from his home to the law firm's downtown office, and the 
		associate was stopped just outside the building.
 
 "The police 
		officer claimed he didn't have brake lights working," Pidgeon said. "But 
		he does."
 
 Here is the email I received early yesterday:
 
 I 
		am writing this now as three black suburbans with HS personnel in camo 
		are moving in to my neighborhood.  I suspect arrest here shortly. In the 
		event that you do not hear from me by tomorrow morning, please continue 
		to contact by me email, as we will try to monitor.  If not, contact Cesar 
		Velasquez in Bellevue, WA (a Washington lawyer) for status.
 
 Stephen Pidgeon
 
 |  
		| Americorps Has Stench Of Authoritar-ianism | With almost no public attention, both chambers of Congress in the past 
		week advanced an alarming expansion of the Americorps national service 
		plan, with the number of federally funded community-service jobs 
		increasing from 75,000 to 250,000 at a cost of $5.7 billion.  
		Lurking behind the feel-good rhetoric spouted by the measure’s advocates 
		is a bill that upon closer inspection reveals multiple provisions that 
		together create a strong odor of creepy authoritarianism. 
 The 
		House passed the measure
		
		overwhelmingly, while only 14 senators had the sense and courage to 
		vote against it on a key procedural motion.  Every legislator who 
		either voted for this bill or didn’t vote at all has some serious 
		explaining to do.
 
 Last summer, then-candidate Barack Obama threw 
		civil liberties to the wind when he proposed "a civilian national 
		security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as 
		well-funded" as the regular military.  The expanded 
		Americorps is not quite so disturbing, but a number of provisions in the 
		bill raise serious concerns.
 
 To begin with, the legislation 
		threatens the voluntary nature of Americorps by calling for 
		consideration of "a workable, fair and reasonable mandatory service 
		requirement for all able young people."  It anticipates the 
		possibility of requiring "all individuals in the United States" to 
		perform such service, including elementary school students.
 
 The 
		bill also summons up unsettling memories of World War II-era 
		paramilitary groups by saying the new program should "combine the best 
		practices of civilian service with the best aspects of military 
		service," while establishing "campuses" that serve as "operational 
		headquarters," complete with "superintendents" and "uniforms" for all 
		participants.  It allows for the elimination of all age 
		restrictions in order to involve Americans at all stages of life.  
		And, it calls for the creation of "a permanent cadre" in a "National 
		Community Civilian Corps."
 
 But that’s not all. The bill also 
		calls for "youth engagement zones" in which "service learning" is "a 
		mandatory part of the curriculum in all of the secondary schools served 
		by the local educational agency."
 
 This updated form of 
		voluntary community service is also to be "integrated into the science, 
		technology, engineering and mathematics curricula" at all levels of 
		schooling.  Sounds like a government curriculum for 
		government-approved "service learning," which is nothing less than 
		indoctrination.
 |  
		| When We Have An Army | About 30 volunteers from 
		Organizing for America canvassed shopping areas and other high-traffic 
		locations in Birmingham, AL, to talk about the need for health care 
		reform, an education overhaul and environmentally friendly energy 
		development. 
 "If we don't change
		
		these three things in the next 10 to 15 years, America is over as we 
		know it," Chris DeHaven, told the group of volunteers before they went 
		their separate ways.
 
 Those who gathered at Kelly Ingram Park in 
		downtown Birmingham were urged to enlist others who share Obama's vision 
		and to stay away from trying to convert naysayers.
 
 "We're 
		looking for supporters," said DeHaven of Hoover, one of the event's 
		organizers. "We're not looking for a fight.  That will come 
		later, when we have an army."
 
 Listen to these guys.  They mean 
		what they say.
 |  
		| No Birth Certificate | On an episode of TruTV's 
		"Speeders," a woman was pulled over for running a red light.  
		Wearing an Obama hat, Obama T-Shirt, and with Obama bumper sticker on 
		the car, she was asked why she did not have a Nevada drivers 
		license.  Her reply?  She could not get one because she could 
		not locate a copy of her birth certificate. 
 But, she could be president.
 |  
		| More Natural Born | In a Seattle, Wash., 
		college classroom, students were 
		discussing the qualifications to be 
		president of the United States.  It was pretty simple -- the 
		candidate must be a natural born citizen of at least 35 years age and 
		fourteen years a resident within the United States. 
 However, one 
		girl in the class objected, saying the "natural born" citizen 
		requirement was unfair.
 
 In short, her opinion was that this 
		requirement prevented many capable individuals from becoming president.
 
 The class was taking it in and letting her rant, but everyone's 
		jaw hit the floor when she wrapped up her argument by stating, "What 
		makes a natural born citizen any more qualified to lead this country 
		than one born by 'C' Section?"
 
 This one is a joke.  It's getting harder to distinguish reality 
		from unreality these days.
 |  ![]()
 © 
				 Copyright  Beckwith  2009All right reserved
 
 |