| 
							 
							  
							
								Obama once dressed as a 
								Somali elder.  Now he has to kill Somali 
								pirates. 
							
							  
							 | 
						 
						
							
							
							  
							   | 
						 
			
						| 
							
 
							
 
  
 
  
 
  | 
						 
					 
					   
					
					 | 			
              
			  
	
		| 
		 event  | 
		
		 description  | 
	 
		
		
	
		| 
			Obama Flunks 3 A.M. Test | 
		While Obama was 
		speaking in Prague about nuclear disarmament, North Korea delivered the 
		most tellingly timed comment on The Trip.  The Pyongyang rogue regime -- 
		proprietor of a nuclear arsenal -- defiantly launched an 
		intercontinental multi-stage rocket in violation of an explicit U.N. 
		Security Council resolution. 
  Obama used strong words about the 
		rocket launch: "Rules must be binding. Violations must be punished.  Words must mean something." 
  Tragically, there were no actions to 
		match Obama's words.  This President prefers to use the United Nations, 
		rather than U.S. power, to protect world peace.  Ludicrously, the 
		Security Council immediately convened in emergency session.  Guess what?  
		After hours of futile discussion, it adjourned without taking action.  A 
		week later, the Council issued a toothless statement "condemning" the 
		launch.  This characterizes the Obama approach to defending our national 
		security.  The aim is to continue blathering in multilateral forums, no 
		matter how dysfunctional, rather than taking effective action.
  
		Pyongyang immediately showed its brazen contempt for the U.N. and 
		Obama's diplomacy by announcing it is quitting the "Six-Party talks," 
		expelling IAEA inspectors and restoring nuclear facilities it had agreed 
		to disable.
  Obama flunked his first 3 A.M. test.
  More
		
		here . . . | 
	 
		
		
	
		| 
			Obama Fails To Use Best Radar | 
		The Obama Administration
		
		denied permission for the U.S. Northern Command to use the 
		Pentagon's most powerful sea-based radar to monitor North Korea's recent 
		missile launch, precluding officials from collecting finely detailed 
		launch data or testing the radar in a real-time crisis, current and 
		former defense officials said. 
  Jamie Graybeal, Northcom public affairs 
		director, confirmed that Air Force Gen. Gene Renuart, the Northcom 
		commander, requested the radar's use, but referred all other questions 
		to the Pentagon. 
  Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman said Mr. 
		Gates' decision not to use the $900 million radar, known as SBX, was 
		"based on the fact that there were numerous ground- and sea-based radars 
		and sensors in the region to support the operational requirements for 
		this launch." 
  SBX, deployed in 2005, can track and identify 
		warheads, decoys and debris in space with very high precision. Officials 
		said the radar is so powerful it could detect a baseball hit out of a 
		ballpark from more than 3,000 miles away, and that other radars used by 
		the U.S. would not be able to provide the same level of detail about 
		North Korea's missile capabilities. | 
	 
		
		
	
		| 
		Tea Parties | 
		
		 
		 
  
		And, from Boston
  
		 
  
		01-20-13  "The End of an Error"
  
		 
  
		Speaks for itself
  
		    | 
	 
		
		
	
		| 
			Napolitano Stands By Controversial Report | 
		Homeland Security 
		Secretary Janet Napolitano said Wednesday that she was briefed before 
		the release of a controversial intelligence assessment and that she 
		stands by the report, which lists returning veterans among terrorist 
		risks to the U.S. 
  But the top House Democrat with oversight of 
		the Department of Homeland Security, Bennie Thompson, said in a letter 
		to Ms. Napolitano that he was "dumbfounded" that such a report would be 
		issued. 
  "This report appears to raise significant issues 
		involving the privacy and civil liberties of many Americans - including 
		war veterans," said Rep. Thompson, chairman of the House Homeland 
		Security Committee, in his letter sent Tuesday night. 
  The letter 
		was representative of a public furor over the nine-page document since 
		its existence was reported on Tuesday. 
  In her statement 
		Wednesday, Ms. Napolitano defended the report, which says "rightwing 
		extremism" may include groups opposed to abortion and immigration, as 
		merely one among several threat assessments.
  Continue
		
		reading . . .
  
		
		Update:  Members of both sides of the aisle in Congress are 
		expressing outrage and seeking an investigation into a new Department of 
		Homeland Security report on "extremism" that targets U.S. military 
		veterans, opponents of abortion and supporters of other conservative 
		causes. 
  
		U.S. Rep Pete Hoekstra, R-Mich., was horrified at 
		what he described as a "shoddy, unsubstantiated" document that was 
		delivered to law enforcement across the nation. 
		
  "I am 
		concerned at what appears to be a shoddy, unsubstantiated, and 
		potentially politicized work product that has been disseminated to the 
		Intelligence Community, and law enforcement as a finished intelligence 
		product," he wrote to DHS chief Janet Napolitano.  "The report 
		appears at best sloppy and unprofessional and at worst a representation 
		of political bias being passed off as intelligence analysis by DHS."
		
  
		According to the Washington Times, Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., said 
		he was "dumbfounded" that the report was, in fact, released. | 
	 
		
		
	
		| 
			Obama's Environmental Plans Will Lead To Energy Chaos | 
		Steve 
		Milloy, founder of JunkScience.com,
		
		says that the U.S. is at "the point of no return" as Obama is set to 
		implement environmental policies that will lead to "energy chaos" in 
		this country.
  The most immediate effect, Milloy said, will be "for your electric bill to go up anywhere 
		from 50 percent to 100 percent or more.  But perhaps the most insidious 
		part of that bill is that it will solidify control of energy policy and 
		our economy by the greens. 
  "Greens are these people who say they 
		are all about the environment, but Milloy thinks that is the furthest thing 
		they are about.  They use the environment as a kind of shield behind 
		which they advance their left-wing, socialist, totalitarian agenda.  
		 "You just look at everything these people want to do.  It’s all about 
		government control of our lives.  Even if there was an environmental 
		problem that I could agree with them on, their solution is always going 
		to be more government control." 
  "They don’t want us to drill for oil.  They don’t want us to use 
		natural gas.  They don’t want us to refine gasoline.  They don’t want us 
		to use nuclear power.  They certainly don’t want us using coal.  People 
		might think that’s because they’re for renewable energy like solar and 
		wind.  That’s not true either.  Look at all the wind projects that are 
		being stopped by the greens. 
  In Georgia there’s a wind project 
		being slowed down because of the alleged concern about the mating habits 
		of whales.  Last June the Bureau of Land Management placed a moratorium 
		on solar projects on public lands because they were concerned about the 
		impact on the critters. 
  In Maryland, a very green state, 
		the governor has placed a ban on windmills on public lands -- and of course the Kennedy's don't want that wind farm off Nantucket 
  
		"So although the greens say they are for renewable energy, when you get 
		right down to it they’re really not.  They’re not for any energy 
		solution.  They’re just for sabotaging our economy, causing chaos, which 
		brings in more government control, because a "wealthy green elite" stand 
		to profit handsomely from green technologies. | 
	 
		
		
	 ![]()  
                © 
				 Copyright  Beckwith  2009 
				All right reserved 
				  
                
                 |