Obama tells
banks and corporation
how it's gonna be.
|
|
|
|
event |
description |
Obama To Force Israel To Surrender Nukes |
The
Washington Times reports that Barack Obama may counter demands from
Israel to confront Iran over their nuclear program by confronting Israel
over theirs. Eli Lake has the exclusive on the Obama administration’s
strategy to force Israel under the umbrella of the non-proliferation
treaty, apparently as a condition to getting Iran to surrender their
nukes. The effort will include India and Pakistan, and comes from a 2006
Saudi peace plan that would leave Israel at the mercy of the armies
surrounding the state.
You won't believe
this stuff . . .
What a hoot!
Obama wants
Israel to surrender something they have -- in return, Iran will
surrender something they haven't. The end result would be Israel's
5.5 million Jews would be at the absolute mercy of their 1.2 billion
Muslim "neighbors."
What kind of deal is that?
And a
thank-you-very-much to the 77% of America's Jews who voted for Obama. |
ACORN Eligible For $8.5 Billion |
After he
reviewed the Obama stimulus bill and the proposed fiscal 2010 budget for
the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), Matthew Vadum told the Washington Examiner that ACORN and other left-wing
advocacy groups could have a shot at pocketing up to $8.5 billion this
year.
Here’s how he arrived at the $8.5 billion figure.
The $800 billion-plus stimulus bill, which is now formally known as the
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 or Public Law 111-5,
originally set aside $5.2 billion that could flow directly or indirectly
into the coffers of ACORN and its liberal friends. It appears the $5.2
billion was chopped down to $3 billion in the version of the bill that
Obama signed into law on February 17. The $3 billion consists of $2
billion in funds set aside for the redevelopment of abandoned and
foreclosed homes and$1 billion in Community Development Block Grants
(CDBG).
CDBG is good old-fashioned graft. Local politicians of
both parties love CDBG because it is flexible. The program gives them
wide latitude when spending grant money and allows local leaders to use
federal dollars on local projects that they wouldn’t dream of spending
their own local tax dollars on. ACORN loves CDBG because it is adept at
lobbying for CDBG funds.
In addition to the $3 billion available
in the stimulus package, the proposed $47.5 billion HUD budget for the
fiscal year that begins October 1 provides $1 billion for an affordable
housing trust fund and $4.5 billion in CDBG funds that could be funneled
to ACORN indirectly.
Of course ACORN won’t get it all, and given
its history of electoral fraud and racketeering, it shouldn’t get a
penny of federal money.
According to a Washington Examiner
article, ACORN has taken in $53.6 million in federal funding since 1994.
Amazingly, ACORN spokesman Scott Levenson told reporter Kevin Mooney
that his group has "received no significant federal funding."
This is the same ACORN that is
continually in trouble for voter fraud. This is the same ACORN
that has pushed the subprime mortgage crisis that has destabilized our
economy. This is the same ACORN that, in the words of Barack
Obama, "is going to shape our national agenda." (video) |
Military Police at the Kentucky Derby |
A Google News search does not produce a story
or even a brief mention of the fact military police were on hand at the
Kentucky Derby to keep the restless in line. However, an
Associated Press photograph, posted on the Yahoo! News website,
shows two MPs in combat fatigues with side arms restraining a man at
the derby.
The military has no business policing citizens
except during extraordinarily exceptional times of national emergency by
an executive order. This is very disturbing and completely
un-American. Maybe even more disturbing is that no one seems to
care how quietly and easily we have accepted the burgeoning police
state.
The presence of uniformed and armed military police at the
Kentucky Derby is part of an ongoing campaign to acclimate the populace
to the presence of soldiers at public events.
|
Feds Investigate Edwards But Not Obama |
Why are
federal authorities investigating the possible illegal use of campaign
funds by John Edwards, but not investigating Barack Obama?
Texas
Darling recently highlighted a story that the mainstream media has
ignored, "A Fortune In Campaign Funds Used to Fight Eligibility Lawsuits,"
about the Obama campaign paying a million dollars in legal fees to fight
lawsuits claiming that he is not a natural-born citizen
But John
Edwards’s suspicious use of campaign funds is getting plenty of
scrutiny.
Details
here . . . |
Obama Seizes Control Of GM |
FreeRepublic.com's Jim Robinson
asks,
which clause of
the constitution authorizes Obama to take over a major corporation
like General Motors?
• He loans the company billions in taxpayer
funds from the US Treasury. • He fires the CEO.
• He takes over the
board of directors. • He converts the debt to equity becoming the
majority stockholder • He's now using the Securities and Exchange
Commission and US Treasury (surely a major conflict of interest) to
issue billions of shares of new public stock completely wiping out the
current stockholders.
Is this even legal?
Is it
constitutional?
General Motors Corp on Tuesday
detailed plans to
all but wipe out the holdings of remaining shareholders by issuing up to
60 billion new shares in a bid to pay off debt to the U.S. government,
bondholders and the United Auto Workers union.
The unusual plan,
which was detailed in a filing with U.S. securities regulators, would
only need the approval of the U.S. Treasury to proceed since the U.S.
government would be the majority shareholder of a new GM, the company
said.
The flood of new stock issuance that could be unleashed
has been widely expected by analysts who have long warned that GM's
shares could be worthless whether the company restructures out of court
or in bankruptcy.
The debt-for-equity exchanges detailed in the
filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission would leave GM's
stock investors with just 1 percent of the equity in a restructured
automaker, ending a long run when the Dow component was seen as a
bellwether for the strength of the broader U.S. economy.
GM
shares closed on Tuesday at $1.85 on the New York Stock Exchange. The
stock would be worth just over 1 cent if the first phase of GM's
restructuring moves forward as described.
Once GM has issued new
shares to pay off its debt to the U.S. government, bondholders and its
major union, it said it would then undertake a 1-for-100 reverse stock
split.
Such a move would take the nominal value of the stock
back to near where it had been before the flood of new shares. But in
the process, GM's existing shareholders would see their stake in the
100-year-old automaker all but wiped out.
|
A Bully In the White House |
Barack Obama's
lawless conduct in connection with the Chrysler bankruptcy is sending
shock waves through the business community. It is important to
understand what is happening here. Many think that Obama is merely
engaging in crony capitalism, favoring his political supporters (most
notably the Auto Workers Union) at the expense of others. That's true,
of course, but it is much worse than that: Obama has tried to bully
those who have not bought his favor -- Chrysler's non-TARP secured
creditors -- into giving up their legal rights by threatening to use the
powers of the White House to damage their businesses. This sort of
lawlessness is common in some of the more corrupt Third World countries,
but it is brand new to the United States.
Continue reading
here
. . . |
©
Copyright Beckwith 2009
All right reserved
|