May 12, 2009
 

Custom Search

 

Obama tells

banks and corporation

how it's gonna be.

 


 
 

help fight the media
 

 

 

 

event

description
Hawaii's Multiple Birth Certificates Generally, folks don't know that Hawaii law, even in 1961, provided for several types of birth records, most of which are not what people think of when they think of birth certificates.  The following is a description of those, including certificates for people not born in Hawaii.

1. In the State of Hawaii, back in 1961, there were three different birth certificates that were obtainable:

   a. If the birth was attended by a physician or mid wife, the attending medical professional was required to certify to the Department of Health the facts of the birth date, location, parents’ identities and other information.  (See Section 57-8 & 9 of the Territorial Public Health Statistics Act in the 1955 Revised Laws of Hawaii which was in effect in 1961).

   b. In 1961, if a person was born in Hawaii but not attended by a physician or mid wife, then, up to the first birthday of the child, an adult could, upon testimony, file a "Delayed Certificate," that required endorsement on the Delayed Certificate of a summary statement of the evidence submitted in support of the acceptance for delayed filing, which evidence must be kept in a special permanent file.  The statute provided that the probative value of the Delayed Certificate must be determined by the judicial or administrative body or official before whom the certificate is offered as evidence.  (See Section 57-18, 19 & 20 of the Territorial Public Health Statistics Act in the 1955 Revised Laws of Hawaii which was in effect in 1961).

   c. If a child born in Hawaii, for whom no physician or mid wife filed a certificate of live birth, and for whom no Delayed Certificate was filed before the first birthday, then a Certificate of Hawaiian Birth could be issued upon testimony of an adult including the subject person) if the Lieutenant Governor was satisfied that a person was born in Hawaii, provided that the person had attained the age of one year.  (See Section 57-40 of the Territorial Public Health Statistics Act in the 1955 Revised Laws of Hawaii which was in effect in 1961).

2. In 1982, the vital records law was amended to create a fourth kind of birth certificate for children born outside of the Territory or State of Hawaii.  HRS Chapter 338 was amended to add a new section authorizing the Director of the Department of Health to issue a birth certificate for a person NOT born in Hawaii either as a Territory or State, upon sufficient proof that the legal parents of such individual had declared the Territory or State of Hawaii as their legal residence for at least one year immediately preceding the birth of such child.

3. The language of the statute clearly applies to births in the days of the Territory of Hawaii, so also births in 1961.

4. A press release concerning numerous questions raised across the country as to whether or not Obama was a natural born citizen was issued on October 31, 2008 by the Hawaii Department of Health by its Director, Dr. Chiyome Fukino.
 
5. In that very carefully worded press release, Dr. Fukino said that she had "personally seen and verified that the Hawaii State Department of Health has Sen. Obama’s original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures."
 
6. The intentional ambiguity of that statement raises more questions that it answered.

7. That statement failed to resolve any of the questions being raised by litigation across the country over the issue of Obama’s birth and qualifications for the office of the President of the United States, including:
 
   a. The specific type of certificate was not identified.  Could it be the certificate for someone born outside of the State of Hawaii?

   b. Being "on record" could mean either that its contents are in the computer database of the department or an actual "vault" original.  If the latter, those are the words used to describe what is there.  The data base record could have been entered based on a birth record for someone born outside of Hawaii.

   c. Therefore, the value as prima facie evidence is limited and easily overcome if any of the allegations of substantial evidence of birth outside Hawaii can be obtained and verified with a Court Order.

8. It should also be noted that in the face of all this litigation, the simple presentation of Obama’s vault birth records would put the questions to rest.

9. Obama has not taken this approach to a single one of the cases, but instead has hired legal counsel across the country at no small expense, much of it illegally from his campaign, to defend the claims with motions to dismiss on standing and similar procedural grounds.

10. Such response to the request for proof that he is qualified to serve as President of the United States of America only serves to raise more questions about this election.
Obama Not Wanted At Notre Dame

 

This billboard is now up in two locations on Interstate 80/90 at the exits leading into South Bend, IN, and will remain up for a month.

To give the organizers some attaboys, your prayers and support, and to get the latest protest information about the University of Notre Dame's decision to have President Obama speak at graduation ceremonies, visit the NotreDameProtest.com website.

Thanks to FReeper "Mrs. Don-o".
 
Air Farce One Photo (Shopped)

 

Yesterday's item about the Photoshopping of the Air Farce One photo released by the White House continues to raise questions.

According to all of the file photos of the Statue of Liberty and the island around her, there is only one flagpole shown and only one American flag flying on it.

Looking at the image released by the White House under magnification, one can clearly see that there are two flags shown but only one is on a flagpole (the one on the right).  The flag and flagpole should be there: the flag without a flagpole below it should not.

This photo was taken on an overcast day, so much so that not even the Statue herself is casting one.

But the flagpole is and in the direction of the second flag.

Curiouser and curiouser . . .
$200,000 A Head Keeping a campaign promise, the first thing Obama did on January 20th was to sign an executive order to release the "brothers" from Gitmo.  It mattered little that he didn't have any place to send them.

Now, a war funding bill headed to the floor next week would provide $50 million to relocate prisoners from the U.S. detention facility at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, without identifying their destination.

Supposedly, Obama would be denied the money until it came up with a detailed plan on how to close the Guantanamo detention facility and how to deal with the 240 or so detainees being held there.  The measure would not allow money to be spent to bring accused terrorists to the U.S. before the end of the budget year on Oct. 1, but says nothing about what happens after that. 

The move is sure to spark a lively debate within the ranks of Senate Democrats, some of whom have spoken strongly against bringing Guantanamo detainees to the United States -- what they are all really saying is -- not to my state, you don't.

Republicans are on the offensive in daily attacks on the idea of closing the prison and in criticizing the administration for moving ahead without a plan.

"Closing this facility by an arbitrary deadline without any alternative is irresponsible and dangerous," said Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.  "It is unacceptable to the American people and it is unacceptable to an increasing number of lawmakers on both sides of the aisle."

Underlying the Guantanamo debate is the suggestion that holding terror detainees in the United States would represent a security threat.

This is what happens when left-wing politics and the air-heads that hold them drive war fighting.

Obama is committed to releasing the terrorists, but no one wants them -- not the states, not our Europoen "allies," not the dung-holes the terrorists come from -- no one -- but Obama is plunging ahead -- he's gonna release them.

I have a suggestion.  There's a nice piece of property at 5046 S. Greenwood, in the Hyde Park section of Chicago, that's vacant.  Maybe Obama can send some of the "brothers" there.  Neighbors, Louis Farrakhan and Bill Ayers, would undoubtedly welcome them with open arms.
Obama Says Socialized Health Care Could Save Trillions On Monday, Obama said a coalition of U.S. health groups would cut rising costs by $2 trillion over the next decade, a move he said would encourage Congress to adopt major healthcare reform this year.

"From 2010 to 2019 a coalition representing doctors, hospitals, drug manufacturers, insurers and laborers are pledging to cut the rate of growth of national healthcare spending by 1.5 percentage points each year -- an amount that's equal to over $2 trillion," Obama said at an appearance announcing the pledge.

Flanked by representatives of the different industry groups, Obama called the commitment "a watershed event in the long-elusive quest for healthcare reform."

Realists were skeptical about the industry groups, some of which opposed reform in the 1990s.  They asked how the administration would ensure the groups lived up to their pledge and whether there would be a way to enforce it.

"Today's announcement promises savings with no concrete plan to achieve them and no enforcement mechanism if they don't," said John Boehner, the Republican leader in the House of Representatives.  "The administration has yet to answer the fundamental question of how to pay for its massive multi-trillion (dollar) health care plan."

None of the groups, which included the American Medical Association, the American Hospital Association and others, offered detailed specifics on how they would pare costs.
Obamanomics And Unemployment A couple of weeks ago Innocent Bystanders published an item on the predicted unemployment numbers for April.  Well, the real numbers came in today, and the result was exactly what they predicted: 8.9% unemployment.

So once again, let’s see how the actual unemployment numbers compare to what Obama’s own economists predicted:

 

 

Oh my.  It appears that his economists can’t predict very well, and that Obama's stimulus package is providing absolutely no benefit.

And it certainly doesn’t look like his plan has "saved or created 150,000 jobs."

©  Copyright  Beckwith  2009
All right reserved