May 27, 2009
 

Custom Search

 

Obama tells

banks and corporation

how it's gonna be.

 


 
 

help fight the media
 

 

 

 

event

description
Obama Does The Impossible He makes European men seem manly.

It’s been a rough couple of weeks for Barack Obama.  Israeli Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu rejected President Pantywaist’s settlement freeze proposal.  Bibi told Bam Bam that his government was not amenable to putting limitations on building Jewish settlements in the capital of Israel.  Obama responded by offering to immediately freeze all US settlements in Washington, DC as a goodwill gesture toward Hamas.

Still stinging from Netanyahu’s rebuff, Obama made the harebrained decision to challenge Dick Cheney to a debate on, of all things, foreign policy.  Someone on Team O was astute enough to realize that TOTUS would not be well served by being the second act to Cheney, whose speech at AEI had been planned for weeks.  Instead, the chaos president scrambled to seize some time immediately preceding the former Vice President’s speech.  In an excruciatingly transparent attempt to run out the clock, Obama began late and dragged his speech out for approximately sixteen hours.

Had no one on the O Team reviewed the Cheney/Edwards match up before the 2004 election in which the picayune Edwards was lambasted effortlessly by Mr. Cheney?  Cheney always makes pummeling liberals look easy.

Obama, petulant at being challenged, took twenty eight shots at the former administration and blathered about some middle way in dealing with terrorists.  Compromise and middle ground are efficacious strategies at PTA meetings; less so with rogue dictators plotting to wipe us off the map.

Wimpy liberals are violently opposed to the use of Enhanced Interrogation Techniques unless practiced on members of the Bush administration.  The thought of putting a caterpillar in a cell with a barbarian who would gladly saw our heads off shocks the liberal conscience.  The left deems water boarding to be a vile form of torture, despite the fact that millions of us water board ourselves every morning with a Neti pot and some SinuCleanse®.

Now that his first official Disgrace to America tour is over, confidence in our Commander in Chief is waning across the pond.  When the Europeans start calling you "President Pantywaist," don’t expect to be taken too seriously by merciless crazy men with nukes.

Continue reading here . . . the hits keep coming . . .
Official Obama Administration Scandals List Contains scandals, mistakes, mishaps, blunders, broken promises, flip flops, gaffes, lies, etc.  That’s too long of a name, so we call it the Scandals List.  Okay?  Check back often for updates!
Presidential
Approval
Index		   
Obama Nominee's Greatest Hits Evidently, the characteristics that matter most for a potential nominee to the Supreme Court have little to do with judicial ability or temperament, or even so ephemeral a consideration as a knowledge of the law.  Instead, the tag line for this appointment says it all.  The president wants to choose "a daughter of Puerto Rican parents raised in Bronx public housing projects to become the nation’s first Hispanic justice."

Obviously, none of these factors disqualifies anyone for the Supreme Court.  But affirmative action standards are a bad way to pick one of the nine most influential jurists in the U.S., whose vast powers can shape virtually every aspect of our current lives.

In a recent case, Ricci v. DeStefano, Sotomayor sided with the City of New Haven that used racially discriminatory practices to deny promotions to firefighters.  She dismissed the case in a one-paragraph statement that, in the opinion of one dissenting judge, ignored the evidence and did not even address the constitutional issues raised by the case.  The percuriam opinion Sotomayor joined went so far out of its way to bury the firefighters' important claims of unfair treatment that her colleague, Judge Jose Cabranes, a Clinton appointee, chastised her.  This case is currently before SCOTUS.

Sotomayor's thinking is representative of the Democratic Party’s powerful identity-politics wing.  She readily admits that she applies her feelings and personal politics when deciding cases.  In a 2002 speech at Berkeley, she stated that she believes it is appropriate for a judge to consider their "experiences as women and people of color," which she believes should "affect our decisions."  She went on to make this blatantly racist comment in that same speech -- "I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experience would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn't lived that life."  She reiterated her commitment to that lawless judicial philosophy at Duke Law School in 2005 when she stated that the "Court of Appeals is where policy is made."

Sotomayor ruled in January 2009 that states do not have to obey the Second Amendment’s commandment that the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.  I guess if the states can ignore the 2nd Amendment, they can ignore they other nine as well?

Judge Sotomayor ruled that a prospective lawyer must be given special consideration in taking the New York state bar exam because her dyslexia qualified as a disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act, despite the fact that she had failed the exam five times.

In another recent decision, U.S.A. v. Marcus, Sotomayor sent the case of a convicted violent sex trafficker back to a lower court because a lower court judge had not specifically told the jury that some, though not all, of the sex trafficking had taken place before it was specifically outlawed.

As a district court judge, Sotomayor also allowed a racial discrimination claim to continue when the plaintiff, a black nurse, sued Bellevue Hospital Corp. because other nurses spoke mainly in Filipino, their native tongue, which she claimed made her feel harassed and isolated.

Sotomayor wants to give jailbirds the right to vote. It's her opinion that the federal Voting Rights Act can be used to force states to allow voting by currently imprisoned felons.

In 1994, Judge Sotomayor ruled in favor of two prisoners who claimed to practice Santeria, a Caribbean religion that involves animal sacrifice and voodoo, saying that "distinctions between 'traditional' and 'non-traditional' religions" are "intolerable."

Sotomayor ruled in a 2007 case that power companies must protect "fish and other aquatic organisms" from being sucked into cooling vents regardless of the costs, saying the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was not allowed to use a cost-benefit analysis in measuring power companies’ compliance with the federal Clean Water Act.  The Supreme Court disagreed.

Substantial questions also persist regarding Judge Sotomayor’s temperament and disposition to be a Supreme Court justice. Lawyers who have appeared before her have described her as a "bully" who "does not have a very good temperament," and who "abuses lawyers" with "inappropriate outbursts."

Some former clerks and prosecutors expressed concerns about her command of technical legal details: In 2001, for example, a conservative colleague, Ralph Winter, included an unusual footnote in a case suggesting that an earlier opinion by Sotomayor might have misstated the law in a way that misled litigants.

Sotomayor also referred to the cardinal duty of judges to be impartial as a mere "aspiration because it denies the fact that we are by our experiences making different choices than others."  And she suggested that "inherent physiological or cultural differences" may help explain why "our gender and national origins may and will make a difference in our judging."

The poor quality of Sotomayor's decisions is reflected in her terrible record of her 60% reversals by the Supreme Court.

But she's got empathy -- defined as the intellectual identification with or vicarious experiencing of the feelings of another -- cue Barry Manilow's "Feelings."

According to the American Bar Association, Sotomayer is a member of the racists group, La Raza.  La Raza is Spanish for "the race."

La Raza's motto is, "Por La Raza todo.  Fuera de La Raza nada," which translates to, "For The Race everything.  Outside The Race, nothing."

The La Raza movement teaches that Colorado, California, Arizona, Texas, Utah, New Mexico, Oregon and parts of Washington State make up an area known as "Aztlan" -- a fictional ancestral homeland of the Aztecs before Europeans arrived in North America.  As such, it belongs to the followers of MEChA.  These are all areas that the United States of America should surrender to "La Raza" once enough immigrants, legal or illegal, enter to claim a majority, as in Los Angeles.  The current borders of the United States will simply be extinguished.

This plan is what is referred to as the "Reconquista" or the re-conquest, of the western United States.

But it won't end with territorial occupation and secession.  The final plan for the La Raza movement includes the ethnic cleansing of Americans of European, African, and Asian descent from "Aztlan."

©  Copyright  Beckwith  2009
All right reserved