Barack Obama is
now hiding his short form Certification of Live Birth. It appears
that Obama has taken down his "Fight the Smears" website.
As the
public groundswell surrounding Obama's birth certificate grows, Obama
has removed his phony Certification of Live Birth from the Internet.
The one at the link
in the "share the fact" box is also gone. What's really strange is
the
archivedcopies
in the WayBackMachine, the Internet Archive, are also gone.
Removing those copies required additional steps to remove and should be
beyond Obama's reach -- but I guess not.
But guess what? Obama's published lies are in
my cache.
I learned a long time ago that anything Obama sensitive has to be
cached, because Obama's Obots will take it down.
What I
never noticed before, is the damning statement in the window in the left
column, under the legend, "Share the Facts Copy the text below and paste
it into your email." It is also in the banner at the top of the
page.
The statement reads (cursor down), "The
fact is Barack Obama was born in the state of Hawaii in 1961, a native
citizen of the United States of America."
A "native born
citizen" is not the same as a "natural born citizen." A "native born
citizen" is any person born in the mainland US.
Anchor babies are
"native born citizens."
A "natural born citizen" must be born in
the mainland US and must have TWO US citizen parents. Obama knows
he had only one US parent. The man knows he is occupying the Oval
Office in violation of the requirements of the US Constitution and
applicable Supreme Court caselaw.
By the way, this page, at the
bottom, also contains Obama's admission that he was, "at birth," a
citizen of Kenya and a British subject.
Presidential Approval Index
Obama Denies History
Obama refuses to admit the U. S. won the Cold War
(01:21)
Then Tells Another Whopper
Obama says he met his wife in class (00:39)
Barack Obama joined the Chicago law
firm, Sidley Austin, as a summer intern in 1989. That's where
he
met his future wife, Michelle Robinson, who
was his adviser.
Michelle obtained her Juris Doctor
degree from Harvard Law School in 1988. Obama began Harvard
Law School in in the fall of the same year. They were never at
law school at the same time. This is just another senseless
Obama lie to add to the ever-growing list.
A separate issue is, why does
Obama tell so many needless lies? Further down the page is an
item about Obama's birthplace. Obama has personally claimed to
be born in two separate hospitals.
What is wrong with him?
Obama's Mythography
The Pittsburgh
Tribune-Review
reports that Obama's Orwellian rhetoric has become absolutely
pathological. And it's become so blatant that you can almost
guarantee that the truth is the exact opposite of what he says. To
wit:
Obama insisted he had no intention of taking over Chrysler
and General Motors -- he did.
Obama calls "cap-and-trade"
environmental legislation a "market-based" approach, based on "sound
science" -- it isn't.
Obama claims his health care reform plan is
not "socialized medicine" -- it is.
He claims it won't harm
private insurance -- it will.
He claims service won't be rationed
-- but to control costs as he proposes, it must be -- even his top aides
concede the point.
Obama says he supports "democracy" in Latin
America -- how can he? -- he also supports the Marxism of Manuel Zelaya
-- legally removed from Honduras' presidency by the constitutional
actions of the legislative and judicial branches.
And the
examples of Obama's mythography go on and on.
Some will dismiss
Barack Obama's pronouncements merely as rhetoric and posturing.
"Everybody does it," they'll say. "It's politics."
But this
is different and decidedly more dangerous: Obama says one thing
and does another and claims things that cannot possibly be.
Whether by delusion or by design, Barack Obama is being dishonest with
the American people. And that is a harbinger of national disaster.
CBO Says Obama Stimulus Is Harmful
Obama's
economic recovery package will actually hurt the economy more in the
long run than if he were to do nothing, the nonpartisan Congressional
Budget Office (CBO)
said Wednesday.
CBO, the official
scorekeepers for legislation, said the House and Senate bills will help
in the short term but result in so much government debt that within a
few years they would crowd out private investment, actually leading to a
lower Gross Domestic Product over the next 10 years than if the
government had done nothing.
CBO estimates that by 2019 the
Senate legislation would reduce GDP by 0.1 percent to 0.3 percent on
net. [The House bill] would have similar long-run effects, CBO said in a
letter to Sen. Judd Gregg, New Hampshire Republican, who was tapped by
Mr. Obama on Tuesday to be Commerce Secretary.
The House last
week passed a bill totaling about $820 billion while the Senate is
working on a proposal reaching about $900 billion in spending increases
and tax cuts.
But Republicans and some moderate Democrats have
balked at the size of the bill and at some of the spending items
included in it, arguing they won't produce immediate jobs, which is the
stated goal of the bill.
The budget office had previously
estimated service the debt due to the new spending could add hundreds of
millions of dollars to the cost of the bill -- forcing the crowd-out.
CBOs basic assumption is that, in the long run, each dollar of
additional debt crowds out about a third of a dollars worth of private
domestic capital, CBO said in its letter.
CBO said there is no
crowding out in the short term, so the plan would succeed in boosting
growth in 2009 and 2010.
The agency projected the Senate bill
would produce between 1.4 percent and 4.1 percent higher growth in 2009
than if there was no action. For 2010, the plan would boost growth by
1.2 percent to 3.6 percent.
CBO did project the bill would
create jobs, though by 2011 the effects would be minuscule.
