>From - Sat Mar 02 00:57:15 2024
Received: by 10.36.23.3 with SMTP id 3mr1662203nzw.1171907881764;
Mon, 19 Feb 2007 09:58:01 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <epau..._at_yahoo.com>
Received: from web55515.mail.re4.yahoo.com (web55515.mail.re4.yahoo.com [206.190.58.224])
by mx.google.com with SMTP id h71si1239624nzf.2007.02.19.09.58.00;
Mon, 19 Feb 2007 09:58:01 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of epau..._at_yahoo.com designates 206.190.58.224 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Status: good (test mode)
Received: (qmail 61798 invoked by uid 60001); 19 Feb 2007 17:58:00 -0000
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q
s; c=nofws;
s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID;
b=H5GnCuW3gLteCp5fBUOuAY8SxAE+cC7YKmCZ9nqfa7cmU5BPGo9g2vY7QlBBWKVrgYQPB8Xa6Qb79WefE0oAEeA52JXjXY1eFoofnwDZ1YmGrI+9kjaOaVJNSQnQBswQbMYQodo8MbBouo/saM7KznFIUryiB7kfPW9gdBWHYa8=;
X-YMail-OSG: kjqrN1sVM1lPIl21LGk3XdJ_vJed7thlzJL4GoYDrAtPDMlBsZOoIDZvL0oqbIC9e5ZNrTdWfYiGxABBIZQIJm6ymyxKtCgsLpSpfJB7Mya0Hm9NCXpEWXSlHlkJU30RkNfBOebt_9Y-
Received: from [12.25.242.25] by web55515.mail.re4.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 09:58:00 PST
X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/368.8 YahooMailWebService/0.6.132.8
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 09:58:00 -0800 (PST)
From: James Brown <epau..._at_yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [TSCM-L] Re: Wideband (AM) detectors improvement using filters ?
To: TSCM-L2006_at_googlegroups.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="0-851561090-1171907880=:61532"
Message-ID: <508864.61532.qm_at_web55515.mail.re4.yahoo.com>
--0-851561090-1171907880=:61532
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Not much engineering goes into ancient modulation (AM) Wish I could help th=
o.
----- Original Message ----
From: "cont..._at_yahoo.co.uk" <cont..._at_yahoo.co.uk>
To: TSCM-L Professionals List <TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com>
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 11:03:05 AM
Subject: [TSCM-L] Re: Wideband (AM) detectors improvement using filters ?
.
MMMM....waiting patiently for any replies.
Either
A) The question is to technical and to difficult...and there are no
techies here.
or
B) The wrong group..since countersurveillance does not involve
knowledge on RF.
or
C) It is not neccesary to have knowledge about your equipment...just
buy it off-the-shelf
and believe whatever the manufacturer states :
(...goes up to 6 Ghz and will detect everything from 2 miles
distance...costs only 99 U$ !)
or
D) This group has lost its interest for the basics...and now only
talks about whatever is in the news
mainly political scandals...etc
or
E) Everyone is just to lazy to reply.
or
F) Fine with me...so itīs probably time for yet another group.
If any one of above is correct...please advice a good place to ask.
Thanks !
contranl
___________________________________________________________________________=
_________
Don't get soaked. Take a quick peak at the forecast
with the Yahoo! Search weather shortcut.
http://tools.search.yahoo.com/shortcuts/#loc_weather
--0-851561090-1171907880=:61532
Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<html><head><style type="text/css"><!-- DIV {margin:0px;} --></style></he=
ad><body><div style="font-family:times new roman, new york, times, serif;=
font-size:12pt"><DIV style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: times new roman=
, new york, times, serif">Not much engineering goes into ancient modul=
ation (AM) Wish I could help tho.<BR><BR>
<DIV style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, time=
s, serif">----- Original Message ----<BR>From: "cont..._at_yahoo.co.uk" <co=
..._at_yahoo.co.uk><BR>To: TSCM-L Professionals List <TSC..._at_googlegroup=
s.com><BR>Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 11:03:05 AM<BR>Subject: [TSCM-=
L] Re: Wideband (AM) detectors improvement using filters ?<BR><BR>
<DIV>.<BR><BR>MMMM....waiting patiently for any replies.<BR><BR><BR>Either<=
BR><BR><BR>A) The question is to technical and to difficult...an=
d there are no<BR>techies here.<BR><BR>or<BR><BR>B) The wrong gr=
oup..since countersurveillance does not involve<BR>knowledge on RF.<BR><BR>=
or<BR><BR>C) It is not neccesary to have knowledge about your equipment...j=
ust<BR>buy it off-the-shelf<BR> and believe whatever=
the manufacturer states :<BR> (...goes up to 6 Ghz =
and will detect everything from 2 miles<BR>distance...costs only 99 U$ !)<B=
R><BR>or<BR><BR>D) This group has lost its interest for the basi=
cs...and now only<BR>talks about whatever is in the news<BR> &nb=
sp; mainly political scandals...etc<BR><BR>or<BR><BR>E)&nb=
sp; Everyone is just to lazy to reply.<BR><BR>or<BR><BR>F) =
Fine with me...so itīs probably time for yet another group.<BR><BR><BR><B=
R>If any one
of above is correct...please advice a good place to ask.<BR><BR><BR>Thanks=
!<BR><BR><BR>contranl</DIV></DIV><BR></DIV></div><br>
<hr size=1>Looking for earth-friendly autos? <br> <a href="
http://auto=
s.yahoo.com/green_center/;_ylc=X3oDMTE4MGw4Z2hlBF9TAzk3MTA3MDc2BHNlYwNtYW=
lsdGFncwRzbGsDZ3JlZW5jZW50ZXI-">Browse Top Cars by "Green Rating"</a> at Ya=
hoo! Autos' Green Center. </body></html>
--0-851561090-1171907880=:61532--
Received on Sat Mar 02 2024 - 00:57:15 CST