Re: Wideband (AM) detectors improvement using filters ?

From: <phil..._at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 23:46:34 -0000

>From - Sat Mar 02 00:57:15 2024
Received: by 10.36.23.4 with SMTP id 4mr1681395nzw.1171913714558;
        Mon, 19 Feb 2007 11:35:14 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <jm..._at_tscm.com>
Received: from lvs00-fl-n04.ftl.affinity.com (lvs00-fl-n04.ftl.affinity.com [216.219.253.138])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 20si1265376nzu.2007.02.19.11.35.14;
        Mon, 19 Feb 2007 11:35:14 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 216.219.253.138 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of jm..._at_tscm.com)
Received: from [70.22.244.211] ([70.22.244.211]:65041 "EHLO Raphael.tscm.com")
        by ams004.ftl.affinity.com with ESMTP id S409882AbXBSTfL convert rfc822-to-8bit
        (ORCPT <rfc822;T..._at_googlegroups.com>);
        Mon, 19 Feb 2007 14:35:11 -0500
Message-Id: <7.0.1.0.2.20070219141508.082573a8_at_tscm.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.1.0
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 14:26:50 -0500
To: "TSCM-L Professionals List" <TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com>
From: "James M. Atkinson" <jm..._at_tscm.com>
Subject: Re: [TSCM-L] Re: Wideband (AM) detectors improvement using
  filters ?
In-Reply-To: <1171904585.436860.170740_at_p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com>
References: <1171551154.380997.148490_at_s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com>
 <1171904585.436860.170740_at_p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; formatowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT

Have you checked out my tutorial on the matter?

http://www.tscm.com/TSCM101noise.html

In case you are not aware of it there are quite
literally thousands of pages of information just
like this on my site, and it will give you a
totally free education on TSCM, just poke arounr
for a while ont he site and you will discover
tens of thousands of pages (no kidding).

OK, more to you questions, watch for the message that follows this one..

-jma





At 12:03 PM 2/19/2007, cont..._at_yahoo.co.uk wrote:

>.
>
>MMMM....waiting patiently for any replies.
>
>
>Either
>
>
>A) The question is to technical and to difficult...and there are no
>techies here.
>
>or
>
>B) The wrong group..since countersurveillance does not involve
>knowledge on RF.
>
>or
>
>C) It is not neccesary to have knowledge about your equipment...just
>buy it off-the-shelf
> and believe whatever the manufacturer states :
> (...goes up to 6 Ghz and will detect everything from 2 miles
>distance...costs only 99 U$ !)
>
>or
>
>D) This group has lost its interest for the basics...and now only
>talks about whatever is in the news
> mainly political scandals...etc
>
>or
>
>E) Everyone is just to lazy to reply.
>
>or
>
>F) Fine with me...so it´s probably time for yet another group.
>
>
>
>If any one of above is correct...please advice a good place to ask.
>
>
>Thanks !
>
>
>contranl

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   World Class, Professional, Ethical, and Competent Bug Sweeps, and
Wiretap Detection using Sophisticated Laboratory Grade Test Equipment.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  James M. Atkinson Phone: (978) 546-3803
  Granite Island Group Fax: (978) 546-9467
  127 Eastern Avenue #291 Web: http://www.tscm.com/
  Gloucester, MA 01931-8008 E-mail: mailto:jm..._at_tscm.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  We perform bug sweeps like it's a full contact sport, we take no prisoners,
and we give no quarter. Our goal is to simply, and completely stop the spy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Sat Mar 02 2024 - 00:57:15 CST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Mar 02 2024 - 01:11:43 CST