>From - Sat Mar 02 00:57:21 2024
Received: by 10.150.96.13 with SMTP id t13mr1075186ybb.19.1247851107863;
Fri, 17 Jul 2009 10:18:27 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <areda..._at_msn.com>
Received: from blu0-omc2-s31.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc2-s31.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.111.106])
by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id 14si271630gxk.3.2009.07.17.10.18.27;
Fri, 17 Jul 2009 10:18:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of areda..._at_msn.com designates 65.55.111.106 as permitted sender) client-ipe.55.111.106;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of areda..._at_msn.com designates 65.55.111.106 as permitted sender) smtp.mail
eda..._at_msn.com
Received: from BLU149-DS20 ([65.55.111.72]) by blu0-omc2-s31.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959);
Fri, 17 Jul 2009 10:18:28 -0700
X-Originating-IP: [24.158.238.87]
X-Originating-Email: [areda..._at_msn.com]
Message-ID: <BLU149-DS20E717520D94D56889FE9DBC1E0_at_phx.gbl>
Return-Path: areda..._at_msn.com
From: "Its from Onion" <areda..._at_msn.com>
To: <TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com>
References: <BLU149-DS178B2772D440BFBF40D887BC210_at_phx.gbl> <b64ae726-fb1e-4dfe-ad7b-190ac5aca925_at_g31g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [TSCM-L] {3958} Re: Consent
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 12:18:25 -0500
In-Reply-To: <BLU149-DS178B2772D440BFBF40D887BC210_at_phx.gbl> <b64ae726-fb1e-4dfe-ad7b-190ac5aca925_at_g31g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0751_01CA06D8.B01095E0"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: MSN 9
X-MimeOLE: Produced By MSN MimeOLE V9.60.0053.2200
Seal-Send-Time: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 12:18:25 -0500
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Jul 2009 17:18:28.0184 (UTC) FILETIME=[999A5D80:01CA0702]
------=_NextPart_000_0751_01CA06D8.B01095E0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sean,
That’s is the way it has been for years. Not what you know but who.
The 'who' in your life are directly proportional to the money you have. (m=
ost cases)
I don’t get invites to Rockefeller, Puff Daddy, or Clinton bashes so I wo=
uld
not have access to he caliber of attorneys these people can mount.
Some attorneys charge tens of thousands of dollars for retainers and then
hundreds if not thousands of dollars per hour for their work.
Worth it? When your but is on the line, damn skippy. Can you or I
afford $325,000.00 to stay out of jail? Doughtfull, but then again
we are not likely to incur that much wrath from law enforcement.
Unless you have MY mother-in-law...... but a way nother story.
It is a sad truth that our justice system is funded by the all mighty dolla=
r.
Case in point, Michael Jackson. Would have gone to jail for child molesta=
tion
had he not paid the parents 20 million dollars to forget what happened to t=
heir son.
sad sad days my friends....
----- Original Message -----
From: sean<mailto:seanj..._at_gmail.com>
To: TSCM-L Professionals List<mailto:TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com>
Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 7:47 AM
Subject: [TSCM-L] {3958} Re: Consent
I am struck at how apparent the prevailing party in these cases can be
predicted with great accuracy by knowing of the financial resources of
that party. Basically in these cases, reason and justice finds it's
way to the party with the largest budget for legal fees.
On Jul 15, 11:30 pm, "Its from Onion" <ared..._at_msn.com<mailto:ared..._at_msn=
.com>> wrote:
> Consent and its limits
>
> Generally, you may record, film, broadcast or amplify any conversation =
where all the parties to it consent. It is always legal to tape or film a f=
ace-to-face interview when your recorder or camera is in plain view. The co=
nsent of all parties is presumed in these instances.
>
SNIP >
------=_NextPart_000_0751_01CA06D8.B01095E0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html;charset=Windows-1252>
<STYLE></STYLE>
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.16850" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY id=MailContainerBody
style="PADDING-LEFT: 10px; FONT-WEIGHT: normal; FONT-SIZE: 12pt; COLOR: #=
000000; BORDER-TOP-STYLE: none; PADDING-TOP: 15px; FONT-STYLE: normal; FONT=
-FAMILY: Times New Roman; BORDER-RIGHT-STYLE: none; BORDER-LEFT-STYLE: none=
; TEXT-DECORATION: none; BORDER-BOTTOM-STYLE: none"
leftMargin=0 topMargin=0 acc_role="text" CanvasTabStop="true"
name="Compose message area"><!--[gte IE 5]><?xml:namespace prefix="v" /=
><?xml:namespace prefix="o" /><![endif]-->
<DIV>
<DIV>Sean,</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>That’s is the way it has been for years. Not what you know but=
who.</DIV>
<DIV>The 'who' in your life are directly proportional to the money you
have. (most cases)</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I don’t get invites to Rockefeller, Puff Daddy, or Clinton bash=
es so I
would</DIV>
<DIV>not have access to he caliber of attorneys these people can mount.</DI=
V>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Some attorneys charge tens of thousands of dollars for retainers and=
then</DIV>
<DIV>hundreds if not thousands of dollars per hour for their work.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Worth it? When your but is on the line, damn skippy. Can you or=
I</DIV>
<DIV>afford $325,000.00 to stay out of jail? Doughtfull, but then
again</DIV>
<DIV>we are not likely to incur that much wrath from law enforcement.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Unless you have MY mother-in-law...... but a way nother
story. </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>It is a sad truth that our justice system is funded by the all mighty=
dollar. </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Case in point, Michael Jackson. Would have gone to ja=
il
for child molestation</DIV>
<DIV>had he not paid the parents 20 million dollars to forget what happened=
to
their son.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>sad sad days my friends....</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LE=
FT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>From:</B> <A
title=mailto:seanj..._at_gmail.com href="mailto:seanj..._at_gmail.com">sean=
</A>
</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A
title=mailto:TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com
href="mailto:TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com">TSCM-L Professionals List</A> <=
/DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Friday, July 17, 2009 7:47 A=
M</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> [TSCM-L] {3958} Re:
Consent</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><BR>I am struck at how apparent the prevailing party in these cases =
can
be<BR>predicted with great accuracy by knowing of the financial resources=
of<BR>that party. Basically in these cases, reason and justice find=
s
it's<BR>way to the party with the largest budget for legal fees.<BR><BR>O=
n Jul
15, 11:30 pm, "Its from Onion" <<A title=mailto:ared..._at_msn.com
href="mailto:ared..._at_msn.com">ared..._at_msn.com</A>> wrote:<BR>>
Consent and its limits<BR>><BR>> Generally, you may record, film,=
broadcast or amplify any conversation where all the parties to it consent=
. It
is always legal to tape or film a face-to-face interview when your record=
er or
camera is in plain view. The consent of all parties is presumed in these=
instances.<BR>><BR></DIV>
<DIV>SNIP ></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_0751_01CA06D8.B01095E0--
Received on Sat Mar 02 2024 - 00:57:21 CST