>From - Sat Mar 02 00:57:21 2024
Received: by 10.90.113.11 with SMTP id l11mr1989083agc.11.1227922539778;
Fri, 28 Nov 2008 17:35:39 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <areda..._at_msn.com>
Received: from blu0-omc2-s31.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc2-s31.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.111.106])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 39si3258450yxd.2.2008.11.28.17.35.39;
Fri, 28 Nov 2008 17:35:39 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of areda..._at_msn.com designates 65.55.111.106 as permitted sender) client-ip=65.55.111.106;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of areda..._at_msn.com designates 65.55.111.106 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=areda..._at_msn.com
Received: from BLU149-DS3 ([65.55.111.73]) by blu0-omc2-s31.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959);
Fri, 28 Nov 2008 17:35:39 -0800
X-Originating-IP: [68.113.113.179]
X-Originating-Email: [areda..._at_msn.com]
Message-ID: <BLU149-DS37C1FD39BC626A184BB8BBC070_at_phx.gbl>
Return-Path: areda..._at_msn.com
From: "Its from Onion" <areda..._at_msn.com>
To: "TSCM-L2006" <TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com>
Subject: Survey
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 19:35:34 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_01BF_01C95190.7B401EB0"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: MSN 9
X-MimeOLE: Produced By MSN MimeOLE V9.60.0053.2200
Seal-Send-Time: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 19:35:34 -0600
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Nov 2008 01:35:39.0312 (UTC) FILETIME=[C8EB0300:01C951C2]
------=_NextPart_000_01BF_01C95190.7B401EB0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Rob / K5UJ,
Oh contrar, I gave you everything you need to answer the question.=20
I said what antenna would YOU put up. Its up to YOU to decide what bands y=
ou want to work,
and what bands you want to have. I would have have something that would be=
directional on 75 meters
BUT, that's ME.
What would YOU have?
Its just a fun question, so please don't go all Sigmund on us.=20
Its not ment to be a "well thought out question", but really it is.
73,
Lee
KE4VYN
=20
Message: 4
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 17:35:53 -0600
From: "Rob Atkinson" <ranch..._at_gmail.com<about:blank>>
I'm sorry Lee; I can't answer because in its current form your survey
is not well thought out.
For one thing, you should include the band(s) you are interested in.
Obviously an antenna for 160 m. is not going to be the "dream" antenna
if you had six meters or the high HF bands in mind.
I can't read your mind. You have to tell me the band or bands you are
surveying.
Your second question asks what antenna if money were a limiting factor
but you don't say what the monetary limit is. It's impossible to
answer.
You say you don't want anyone to say 20 SteppIRs at 300 feet but maybe
that's what someone would get if space, land, and money were not
limiting factors. It could be a reasonable and powerful system
(however I would prefer three dipole curtains, each with around 60
dipoles in parallel suspended vertically in front of a screen between
two towers).
73
rob / k5uj
------=_NextPart_000_01BF_01C95190.7B401EB0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3Dtext/html;charset=3Diso-8859-1>
<STYLE></STYLE>
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.6000.16735" name=3DGENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY id=3DMailContainerBody=20
style=3D"PADDING-LEFT: 10px; FONT-WEIGHT: normal; FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: #=
000000; BORDER-TOP-STYLE: none; PADDING-TOP: 15px; FONT-STYLE: normal; FONT=
-FAMILY: Verdana; BORDER-RIGHT-STYLE: none; BORDER-LEFT-STYLE: none; TEXT-D=
ECORATION: none; BORDER-BOTTOM-STYLE: none"=20
leftMargin=3D0 topMargin=3D0 acc_role=3D"text" CanvasTabStop=3D"true"=20
name=3D"Compose message area"><!--[gte IE 5]><?xml:namespace prefix=3D"v" /=
><?xml:namespace prefix=3D"o" /><![endif]-->
<DIV>Rob / K5UJ,</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Oh contrar, I gave you everything you need to answer the=20
question. </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I said what antenna would YOU put up. Its up to YOU to decide wh=
at=20
bands you want to work,</DIV>
<DIV>and what bands you want to have. I would have have something=20
that would be directional on 75 meters</DIV>
<DIV>BUT, that=92s ME.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>What would YOU have?</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Its just a fun question, so please don=92t go all Sigmund on=
=20
us. </DIV>
<DIV>Its not ment to be a "well thought out question", but really it is.</D=
IV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>73,</DIV>
<DIV>Lee</DIV>
<DIV>KE4VYN</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Message: 4<BR>Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 17:35:53 -0600<BR>From: "Rob Atki=
nson"=20
<<A title=3Dabout:blank href=3D"">ranch..._at_gmail.com</A>><BR><BR>I'm =
sorry=20
Lee; I can't answer because in its current form your survey<BR>is not well=
=20
thought out.<BR><BR>For one thing, you should include the band(s) you are=
=20
interested in.<BR><BR>Obviously an antenna for 160 m. is not going to be th=
e=20
"dream" antenna<BR>if you had six meters or the high HF bands in mind.<BR><=
BR>I=20
can't read your mind. You have to tell me the band or bands you=20
are<BR>surveying.<BR><BR>Your second question asks what antenna if money we=
re a=20
limiting factor<BR>but you don't say what the monetary limit is. It's=
=20
impossible to<BR>answer.<BR><BR>You say you don't want anyone to say 20 Ste=
ppIRs=20
at 300 feet but maybe<BR>that's what someone would get if space, land, and =
money=20
were not<BR>limiting factors. It could be a reasonable and powerful=
=20
system<BR>(however I would prefer three dipole curtains, each with around=
=20
60<BR>dipoles in parallel suspended vertically in front of a screen=20
between<BR>two towers).<BR><BR><BR>73<BR><BR>rob / k5uj<BR></DIV></BODY></H=
TML>
------=_NextPart_000_01BF_01C95190.7B401EB0--
Received on Sat Mar 02 2024 - 00:57:21 CST