Re: [TSCM-L] {2226} Re: BPL

From: Its from Onion <areda..._at_msn.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2007 00:09:10 -0600

>From - Sat Mar 02 00:57:23 2024
Received: by 10.114.208.20 with SMTP id f20mr4935407wag.2.1198835131697;
        Fri, 28 Dec 2007 01:45:31 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <kon..._at_phreaker.net>
Received: from aacompsec.com (aacompsec.com [205.134.161.162])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTP id x35si13200362nzg.2.2007.12.28.01.45.31;
        Fri, 28 Dec 2007 01:45:31 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 205.134.161.162 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of kon..._at_phreaker.net) client-ip=205.134.161.162;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 205.134.161.162 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of kon..._at_phreaker.net) smtp.mail=kon..._at_phreaker.net
Received: from aacompsec.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by aacompsec.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B94D503BDF81
        for <tscm-..._at_googlegroups.com>; Fri, 28 Dec 2007 04:45:31 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <4774C48B.5010908_at_phreaker.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2007 04:40:27 -0500
From: kondrak <kon..._at_phreaker.net>
Reply-To: kon..._at_phreaker.net
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
To: TSCM-L2006_at_googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [TSCM-L] {2227} Re: BPL
References: <20071227024233.BE4D333E14_at_absinthe.tinho.net> <477442E9.5090308_at_phreaker.net> <BLU116-DAV258BEDFE9FC6253F390EEBC550_at_phx.gbl>
In-Reply-To: <BLU116-DAV258BEDFE9FC6253F390EEBC550_at_phx.gbl>
X-AAC-KTE-LTE-MailScanner-Watermark: 1199439628.65772_at_euWM3EwKUXgVpL0jc0XujQ

Oh hell yeah!

Its from Onion wrote:
> ahhh! I knew he had a sense of humor!
>
> Happy New Years gang!
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* kondrak <mailto:kon..._at_phreaker.net>
> *To:* TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com
> <mailto:TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com>
> *Sent:* Thursday, December 27, 2007 6:27 PM
> *Subject:* [TSCM-L] {2226} Re: BPL
>
>
> You forgot: Personal nuclear power plant.
>
> d..._at_geer.org <mailto:d..._at_geer.org> wrote:
> > kondrak writes:
> > -+-------------
> > | Theres a method here, its an unbridled surveillance device
> the power
> > | companies can use to generate data, and a way to violate our
> privacy,
> > | <snip>
> >
> > Some choices
> > a) Motor/generator isolation
> > b) Solar/altfuel backfeed
> > c) Going entirely off-grid
> > d) Noise injection
> > e) All of the above
> > f) Other
> >
> > --dan
> >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> >
Received on Sat Mar 02 2024 - 00:57:23 CST