>From - Sat Mar 02 00:57:24 2024
Received: by 10.151.7.12 with SMTP id k12mr31454ybi.8.1249916955174;
Mon, 10 Aug 2009 08:09:15 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <subr..._at_gmail.com>
Received: from mail-yw0-f173.google.com (mail-yw0-f173.google.com [209.85.211.173])
by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id 16si628570gxk.1.2009.08.10.08.09.14;
Mon, 10 Aug 2009 08:09:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of subr..._at_gmail.com designates 209.85.211.173 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.211.173;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of subr..._at_gmail.com designates 209.85.211.173 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=subr..._at_gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) head..._at_gmail.com
Received: by ywh3 with SMTP id 3so4044598ywh.22
for <TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com>; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 08:09:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=/anpECyxROTRsDihR7EA2W8trPgrWZJaZB0lyLGpDwg=;
b=ZavDgjAMITXhGCCCa7YsBXZLufCV394N6PXJz7oh5Ibzvdjgn1iWTMzb0sa6nbE3+y
bD2ZceFl8UToRfKLScRDk47jlAexfakk1SnzMu98kMA1bj31JwRpbacNMoXmXp12dFg8
UOqxMzeX6SZjZHEgIFdjaYEJfQbJX2mDmftDw=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type;
b=pgB6pNTVcQMXjS02dkrR4U4BHH9gpPA6jq0e2U5kzAe4Y1upmlk3slBgtb/giMXuc+
VZPw0qV6nYx8HcLpeVndWXFkDye4eOkcCR0e4HMJiI5HknZLGuzKuNMC0HKHiW4HuqIX
yii6YI06pR7z2txxL/b5yDtEO3FZ+vaSUgYVI=
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="000e0cd4cddeff52ee0470caf746"
Received: by 10.150.206.8 with SMTP id d8mr7245923ybg.85.1249916953252; Mon,
10 Aug 2009 08:09:13 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <392011.60275.qm_at_web110212.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
References: <aadbd07a-e805-49d3-96ff-60cf4bc8b18e_at_d23g2000vbm.googlegroups.com>
<392011.60275.qm_at_web110212.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 11:09:13 -0400
Message-ID: <b06e1e7d0908100809m2eec26bap63f29dc4e37bf026_at_mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [TSCM-L] {4093} Re: TSCM Question
From: Sub Rosa <subr..._at_gmail.com>
To: TSCM-L2006_at_googlegroups.com
--000e0cd4cddeff52ee0470caf746
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Dan,
Thanks for the info, now i know that at least sombody found a bug above
6Ghz!
Scott
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 10:37 PM, taylo..._at_yahoo.com
<taylo..._at_yahoo.com>wrote:
> scott,
>
> yes once in the 30 years a device at 10.525ghz xband it was during a
> domestic and no one was more surprised than me.
>
> dan
> taylor group
> --- On *Sun, 8/9/09, subrosa <subr..._at_gmail.com>* wrote:
>
>
> From: subrosa <subr..._at_gmail.com>
> Subject: [TSCM-L] {4092} TSCM Question
> To: "TSCM-L Professionals List" <TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com>
> Date: Sunday, August 9, 2009, 7:25 AM
>
>
> Greetings List Members,
>
> I have only been following this list for about a month now, but I
> would like to ask a question that may have already been answered, that
> I may have missed;
>
> Has anyone on this list ever experienced an electronic surveillance
> threat "find" above 6 Ghz ???
>
> Just wondering because I don't believe I have ever read or spoken with
> anyone who has.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Scott
>
>
>
>
> >
>
--000e0cd4cddeff52ee0470caf746
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div>Dan,</div>
<div>=A0</div>
<div>Thanks for the info, now i know that at least sombody found a bug abov=
e 6Ghz!</div>
<div>=A0</div>
<div>Scott<br><br></div>
<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 10:37 PM, <a href=3D"mail=
to:taylo..._at_yahoo.com">taylo..._at_yahoo.com</a> <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=
=3D"mailto:taylo..._at_yahoo.com">taylo..._at_yahoo.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0=
px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">
<table cellspacing=3D"0" cellpadding=3D"0" border=3D"0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign=3D"top">
<div>scott,</div>
<div>=A0</div>
<div>yes once in the 30 years a device at 10.525ghz xband it was during a d=
omestic and no one was more surprised than me.</div>
<div>=A0</div>
<div><span>dan</span><br>taylor group<br>--- On <b>Sun, 8/9/09, subrosa <i>=
<<a href=3D"mailto:subr..._at_gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">subr..._at_gmail.co=
m</a>></i></b> wrote:<br></div>
<blockquote style=3D"PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: rgb(=
16,16,255) 2px solid"><br>From: subrosa <<a href=3D"mailto:subr..._at_gmail=
.com" target=3D"_blank">subr..._at_gmail.com</a>><br>Subject: [TSCM-L] {409=
2} TSCM Question<br>
To: "TSCM-L Professionals List" <<a href=3D"mailto:TSCM-..._at_go=
oglegroups.com" target=3D"_blank">TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com</a>><br>Date=
: Sunday, August 9, 2009, 7:25 AM<br><br>
<div><br>Greetings List Members,<br><br>I have only been following this lis=
t for about a month now, but I<br>would like to ask a question that may hav=
e already been answered, that<br>I may have missed;<br><br>Has anyone on th=
is list ever experienced an electronic surveillance<br>
threat "find" above 6 Ghz ???<br><br>Just wondering because I don=
't believe I have ever read or spoken with<br>anyone who has.<br><br>Th=
anks!<br><br>Scott<br><br><br><br><br></div></blockquote></td></tr>
<tr>
<td><br></p>
<p></p></p></td></tr></tbody></table></blockquote></div><br>
--000e0cd4cddeff52ee0470caf746--
Received on Sat Mar 02 2024 - 00:57:24 CST