>From - Sat Mar 02 00:57:24 2024
Received: by 10.224.54.9 with SMTP id o9mr929076qag.23.1249937516380;
Mon, 10 Aug 2009 13:51:56 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <James..._at_aeccp.com>
Received: from smtp109.biz.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp109.biz.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.53.8])
by gmr-mx.google.com with SMTP id 22si533877qyk.6.2009.08.10.13.51.56;
Mon, 10 Aug 2009 13:51:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 206.190.53.8 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of James..._at_aeccp.com) client-ip=206.190.53.8;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 206.190.53.8 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of James..._at_aeccp.com) smtp.mail=James..._at_aeccp.com
Received: (qmail 75026 invoked from network); 10 Aug 2009 20:51:56 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO jamesimeejdPC) (James..._at_66.57.230.94 with login)
by smtp109.biz.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 10 Aug 2009 20:51:55 -0000
X-Yahoo-SMTP: icSHTemswBCJyebu1Bbk5JWYzj7WW8FNu9PNv_0INeLAQA--
X-YMail-OSG: Lj2beosVM1kHtWZqp4JCKH3r.zE.szQBWAy0jeKK0SCVAo8YGm9CQWX5HVCZZYtoSt1jT78Ky.CcbmoJ9QylwmU7p72dZiddpWbtAFGLZo.M85R7L8j582G0S8WczAocD7nKT3mMEhSgA2xGU0f0a1mLRDo0gdIV7H0zaVtGQ88mX1dBEwaTizLdof8RSW9XwLeEGi8lMBEasrizfdBbNF1I6KBpiSNwPMLTCZRxr1huXlYZcc7UQLGw0KocBGhAxAgWPGWeNojyhe6Coy6KxdU6oh2ghDMxwThlQm123gEsfPhKMyxZ4K2WQtldWWhyG.MZMavbc0Ejf60L7euyAdGjrrjt_yHxjjQ0cM5ByLjCjptkLzek4mOEO_wDYllhLmxpAZS81HMX8C49Og_SNUfFwh_PPbf70Sb22Q--
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
Message-ID: <3D80E13CF43F4009904F5DD388A93C0B_at_jamesimeejdPC>
Reply-To: "James R. King" <James..._at_aeccp.com>
From: "James R. King" <James..._at_aeccp.com>
To: <TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com>
References: <aadbd07a-e805-49d3-96ff-60cf4bc8b18e_at_d23g2000vbm.googlegroups.com> <392011.60275.qm_at_web110212.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <b06e1e7d0908100809m2eec26bap63f29dc4e37bf026_at_mail.gmail.com> <BLU149-DS18F351D5B2BDFFBFAFAE46BC060_at_phx.gbl> <4A8077CC.5020707_at_gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4A8077CC.5020707_at_gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [TSCM-L] {4103} Re: TSCM Question
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 16:51:54 -0400
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6002.18005
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6002.18005
I know these people use such items in that range:
http://www.boschsecurity.us/en-us/
----- Original Message -----
From: "Eric Schmiedl" <eric.s..._at_gmail.com>
To: <TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com>
Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 3:41 PM
Subject: [TSCM-L] {4103} Re: TSCM Question
It sounds like just the opposite -- a very sophisticated bug found where
one would more expect a jerry-rigged baby monitor.
Its from Onion wrote:
> It all goes back to 'know your clients threats.' Yes, they are out there
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Sub Rosa <mailto:subr..._at_gmail.com>
> *To:* TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com <mailto:TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com>
> *Sent:* Monday, August 10, 2009 10:09 AM
> *Subject:* [TSCM-L] {4099} Re: TSCM Question
>
> Dan,
>
> Thanks for the info, now i know that at least sombody found a bug
> above 6Ghz!
>
> Scott
>
> On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 10:37 PM, taylo..._at_yahoo.com
> <mailto:taylo..._at_yahoo.com> <taylo..._at_yahoo.com
> <mailto:taylo..._at_yahoo.com>> wrote:
>
> scott,
>
> yes once in the 30 years a device at 10.525ghz xband it was
> during a domestic and no one was more surprised than me.
>
> dan
> taylor group
> --- On *Sun, 8/9/09, subrosa /<subr..._at_gmail.com
> <mailto:subr..._at_gmail.com>>/* wrote:
>
>
> From: subrosa <subr..._at_gmail.com
> <mailto:subr..._at_gmail.com>>
> Subject: [TSCM-L] {4092} TSCM Question
> To: "TSCM-L Professionals List" <TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com
> <mailto:TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com>>
> Date: Sunday, August 9, 2009, 7:25 AM
>
>
> Greetings List Members,
>
> I have only been following this list for about a month now,
> but I
> would like to ask a question that may have already been
> answered, that
> I may have missed;
>
> Has anyone on this list ever experienced an electronic
> surveillance
> threat "find" above 6 Ghz ???
>
> Just wondering because I don't believe I have ever read or
> spoken with
> anyone who has.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Scott
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >
Received on Sat Mar 02 2024 - 00:57:24 CST