Wow! That kind of full site survey sounds like it gets expensive.
That much gear for that many days, and 2 or more staff etc ...
Of course I fully understand the need for that level of detail if you are
expected to declare the site clean.
It is of course easy to find a "bug" that is on, hidden in the flower pot
etc ...
Its much harder to say that such a thing is NOT there.
Question: What kinds of legal language etc, disclaimers etc would you use
when saying a site is clean?
Or do you only ever say we did not detect anything hostile under the stated
testing methods?
Just asking in general terms as a point of interest. Not expecting a full
in-depth legal kind of reply. Just asking as you made me wonder such things.
Regards,
Jim,
Wellington
New Zealand
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com
> [mailto:TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of James M. Atkinson
> Sent: Monday, 20 November 2006 4:56 p.m.
> To: TSCM-L
> Subject: [TSCM-L] Radiated Signals Protocol
>
>
>
> Radiated Signals Protocol
> by James M. Atkinson, Granite Island Group
> http://www.tscm.com/
>
> The TSCM survey will include a detailed inventory and evaluation of
> all electro-magnetic energy present in the area being inspected. This
> inventory will include the use of both spectrum analyzers and search
> receivers, but may also include various broad-band diode detectors
> and related systems. However, only calibrated laboratory grade
> instruments shall be used to support the determination that an
> eavesdropping is not present, with non-calibrated systems being used
> solely as an aid to the calibrated systems.
Etc ...
Received on Sat Mar 02 2024 - 00:57:24 CST