Kinda thought that VLF -> HF would not be too productive for 'bugs&#=
39; as the antenna length would be a difficulty, though I have receivers th=
at I can plug these frequencies in in Khz and they will happily scan those =
as well
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 9:56 PM, James M. At=
kinson
<jm...@tscm.c=
om> wrote:
Yes, they are in MHz
Dumping these into a set of scanners will find bugs faster then you can pos=
sibly imagine.
I recommend the R-20, and have converted these to R-20 .icf format is anybo=
dy is interested, and would be happy to point you to where that can be foun=
d on my website.
-jma
David Johnson wrote:
Guessing these frequencies are in MHz
-----Original Message-----
From: tscm-.=
.._at_googlegroups.com [mailto:tscm-l2006_at_googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of James M. Atkinson
Sent: October-12-11 4:41 PM
To: tscm-...=
_at_googlegroups.com
Subject: [TSCM-L] {5743} TSCM Fertility Dance
Here is an undated list of highly fertile frequencies that you SHOUL=
D be
checking when you perform a bug sweep.
Just download these into your scanners and leave then running during the
sweep and you might be quite surprised at what you find.
Also, check of of these with a spectrum analyzer, using a dispersion of
100 kHz or less, and an IF BW of 1 kHz or less, and you will be doubly
impress at what you find.
Beware though about your antennas, and break these frequencies up by bands<=
br>
and use an optimal antenna for each band, or use a shared active antenna.
30.0000
30.4128
30.7200
--
James M. Atkinson
President and Sr. Engineer
"Leonardo da Vinci of Bug Sweeps and Spy Hunting"
Granite Island Group
jm...@tscm.com
http://www.tscm.com/=
(978) 546-3803
--000e0ce0edae8b8b4f04af2489a8--
Received on Sat Mar 02 2024 - 00:57:26 CST