(no subject) from Its from Onion on 2009-02-11 (file.mbox)

From: Its from Onion <areda..._at_msn.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 19:33:58 -0600

>From - Sat Mar 02 00:57:26 2024
Received: by 10.224.219.144 with SMTP id hu16mr175833qab.1.1351815550472;
 Thu, 01 Nov 2012 17:19:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: tscm-l2006_at_googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.224.210.4 with SMTP id gi4ls6133608qab.2.gmail; Thu, 01 Nov
2012 17:19:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.224.111.140 with SMTP id s12mr167372qap.5.1351815546979;
 Thu, 01 Nov 2012 17:19:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.224.111.140 with SMTP id s12mr167370qap.5.1351815546947;
 Thu, 01 Nov 2012 17:19:06 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <areda..._at_msn.com>
Received: from snt0-omc2-s2.snt0.hotmail.com (snt0-omc2-s2.snt0.hotmail.com. [65.55.90.77])
 by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id x31si1983258qco.0.2012.11.01.17.19.06;
 Thu, 01 Nov 2012 17:19:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of areda..._at_msn.com designates 65.55.90.77 as permitted sender) client-ip=65.55.90.77;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of areda..._at_msn.com designates 65.55.90.77 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=areda..._at_msn.com
Received: from SNT107-W3 ([65.55.90.73]) by snt0-omc2-s2.snt0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675);
 Thu, 1 Nov 2012 17:19:06 -0700
Message-ID: <SNT107-W3229263BE3EC2C5A2A658BC670_at_phx.gbl>
Return-Path: areda..._at_msn.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="_bf015ec1-d935-471c-831a-b4bb645a23dd_"
X-Originating-IP: [76.218.225.8]
From: Its from Onion <areda..._at_msn.com>
To: tscm-l2006 <tscm-..._at_googlegroups.com>
Subject:
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 00:19:06 +0000
Importance: Normal
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Nov 2012 00:19:06.0562 (UTC) FILETIME=[ABCA7A20:01CDB88F]

--_bf015ec1-d935-471c-831a-b4bb645a23dd_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Ever get that feeling you're being watched?Well, at least one Iowa City wom=
an was correct in that assumption when she learned that she someone was wat=
ching her through a hole in her ceiling while she was taking a shower.That =
someone was her landlord.Elwyn G. Miller, 63, of Iowa City, is accused of i=
nvasion of privacy for allegedly peeping on his female tenants while they w=
ere in their bathrooms. An Iowa City police complaint outlining the charge,=
a serious misdemeanor, does not indicate how many women Miller has spied o=
n, or for how long, but police said Miller was looking in on several apartm=
ents on =93multiple occasions.=94The investigation started when police were=
called to 639 S. Lucas St. for a report of someone peeping into a woman=92=
s apartment. The woman, the sole occupant of the apartment unit, pointed ou=
t Miller as the person who was spying on her.Police said Miller was watchin=
g the woman through a peep hole next to a vent fan.Miller allegedly told po=
lice he was =93not interested in them as persons,=94 but because they were =
women and naked.More here: http://www.indystar.com/article/D2/20121101/NEWS=
01/121101005/Police-Peeping-Tom-landlord-spied-tenants-bathrooms-showers?od=
yssey=3Dnav%7Chead&nclick_check=3D1 =09=09 =09 =09=09 =20
--_bf015ec1-d935-471c-831a-b4bb645a23dd_
Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html>
<head>
<style></style></head>
<body class=3D'hmmessage'><div dir=3D'ltr'>
Ever get that feeling you're being watched? <sp=
an style=3D"line-height: 24px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); color:=
rgb(44, 44, 44); font-family: Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16p=
x; ">Well, at least one Iowa City woman was correct in that assumption when=
she learned that she someone was watching her through a hole in her ceilin=
g while she was taking a shower. That someone was=
her landlord. Elwyn G. Miller, 63, of Iowa City,=
is accused of invasion of privacy for allegedly peeping on his female tena=
nts while they were in their bathrooms. An Iowa City police complaint outli=
ning the charge, a serious misdemeanor, does not indicate how many women Mi=
ller has spied on, or for how long, but police said Miller was looking in o=
n several apartments on =93multiple occasions.=94 The investigation started when police were called to 639 S. Lucas St. for =
a report of someone peeping into a woman=92s apartment. The woman, the sole=
occupant of the apartment unit, pointed out Miller as the person who was s=
pying on her. Police said Miller was watching the=
woman through a peep hole next to a vent fan. Mi=
ller allegedly told police he was =93not interested in them as persons,=94 =
but because they were women and naked. More here: <a href=3D"http://www.indystar.com/article/D2/20121=
101/NEWS01/121101005/Police-Peeping-Tom-landlord-spied-tenants-bathrooms-sh=
owers?odyssey=3Dnav%7chead&nclick_check=3D1" target=3D"_blank" style=3D=
"line-height: 17px; color: rgb(0, 104, 207); cursor: pointer; font-family: =
Georgia, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255)=
; ">http://www.indystar.com/article/D2/20121101/NEWS01/121101005/Police-Pee=
ping-Tom-landlord-spied-tenants-bathrooms-showers?odyssey=3Dnav%7Chead&=
nclick_check=3D1</a> =09=09 =09 =09=09 </div></body>
</html>
--_bf015ec1-d935-471c-831a-b4bb645a23dd_--
Received on Sat Mar 02 2024 - 00:57:26 CST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Mar 02 2024 - 01:11:46 CST