Re: [TSCM-L] {1924} Re: question for you

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: kondrak <kon..._at_phreaker.net>
Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2007 22:54:53 -0400

> of course i'm assuming you're not stupid enough to use a cell phone
> that someone has wired over the switch or programmed it for silent ops,
> i mean nobody is that dumb. because that would mean it is turned on,
> and invalidates your point.
>
> right?
>
> ll
Received on Sat Mar 02 2024 - 00:57:27 CST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Intelligence: "Re: [TSCM-L] {1911} Re: question for you"
Previous message: Paul E. Niedermeyer: "Article | CAUGHT BY THE GPS: CELLPHONE TRACKED CITY WORKER DODGING WORK..."
In reply to: Intelligence: "Re: [TSCM-L] {1911} Re: question for you"
Next in thread: James M. Atkinson: "Re: [TSCM-L] {1924} Re: question for you"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Mar 02 2024 - 01:11:46 CST