Re: [TSCM-L] {1932} Re: [Fwd: Air rights]

From: James M. Atkinson <jm..._at_tscm.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2007 14:14:00 -0400

Mitch,

You aren't kidding, way too many folks live for the grand conspiracies that are not happening, and fail to see the smaller ones that are happening right under their nose, but that are too involved in looking at the conspiracies that only make themselves feel important, or which give them identity in the face of their own emotional impotence.

A LEO satellite (low Earth orbit, NOT law enforcement officer) is really not a problem as they are already used for weather, agriculture, and similar situations where we use them as a scientific eye-in-the sky.  Also, unless someone is dancing naked in the woods, or performing un-natural acts with farm animals, or burying a corpse on some country road the impact of a low orbit satellite is going to be nothing to be concerned about. In fact an technical 10*10 camera on an low altitude airplane will give far superior images then anything you can get from a low orbit satellite.

People who wear their tin-foil hat a little too snug get all wound up about low orbit satellites, when a 10*10 aerial camera on a slow moving airplane is far more intrusive (especially if the plane uses LIDAR, and multiple cameras).

If you want something to fear, look at the source code and translations for the 5ESS, and DMS100 switches.

-jma


At 11:49 AM 9/4/2007, TSCM/SO Group wrote:
Yes and Glugle will sell this service for the agencies.
It will be called Glugle Earth Dark Version for Law Enforcement/Spyshops
You will need a name and password to access the front end,it comes with a CD that will be pre packaged in a Black Pelican Case,the new feature will include driving directions to every police dept in the US,
Federal Funding will cover the cost of the package after initial testing.
 
I love it when crap like this surfaces, the companies that mfg aluminum foil will see an increase in their stock as sales of foil for headwear increases................
 
Sorry,I couldn't resist <g>
 
 
 
Mitch Davis
TSCM/Special Operations Group
20 Music Square West,Suite 208
Nashville,TN 37203 USA
615 251 0441
Fax 615 523 0300
mit..._at_tscmusa.com
www.tscmusa.com
" maintaining a higher degree of excellence"
******************************
Tools for investigators at www.covertworx.com

From: TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com [ mailto:TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of kondrak
Sent: Monday, September 03, 2007 2:54 AM
To: TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com
Subject: [TSCM-L] {1922} [Fwd: Air rights]
 
 
http://www.newsobserver.com/opinion/editorials/story/676165.html

Air rights




In the latest government surveillance twist, spy satellites will be used for domestic law enforcement. Is this still America?





Most Americans have accepted the Bush administration's view that after 9/11 it's a new and more restrictive world out there. Additional security procedures at airports, less privacy for phone calls -- we go along with all sorts of measures aimed at thwarting another terror attack.

Is the sky the limit?

A new program ordered up by Michael McConnell, director of National Intelligence, will give police and others access to some information from the spy satellites that pass above the U.S. along their paths over the globe. The images and data will be employed initially for border security and emergency preparedness; law enforcement uses ("covering both criminal and civil law," according to The Wall Street Journal, which broke the story) are to follow. These spy satellites are able to "see" through cloud cover and even obtain data from inside buildings and bunkers.

They can't, we're assured, tell whether that gent in the street needs a haircut. Not yet, anyway.

Up to now, with a few exceptions for scientific purposes, spy satellites have been used for spying on bad actors abroad. Now they'll focus on us too.

It's hard to swallow, if you think freedom means more than national independence. But it fits a pattern that's not easy to break.

Keeping close tabs

Americans' expectations of personal privacy have been pushed and prodded plenty in recent years, until we hardly know what rights we have. We're videotaped on the streets, radar-timed on the roads, monitored in our calls to companies, told to wear security badges and asked for a phone number even when we pay cash. We're followed by "cookies" in our wanderings around the Web, and when we e-mail or call someone abroad, our words may be intercepted by the government and sorted through by a supercomputer for a revealing word.

Not to mention the trade-offs we make oh-so voluntarily as we trade privacy for convenience -- in the supermarket checkout lane (store cards track personal purchases); in a turnpike's electronic transponder lane (E-ZPass records are being used in divorce cases); and when we sign up for car-tracking services such as OnStar that know if we made the right turn back there.

Now the Feds and local law enforcement will also be looking in on America from low-Earth orbit. As for civil libertarians' concerns, Homeland Security says it will have its lawyers review law enforcement agencies' requests for satellite data before granting them. Does that include review by a court too? The stories are silent.

And even with a nod to civil liberties, the bottom line is that police are winning access to satellites run by the defense and intelligence establishments, satellites intended for quite different purposes than domestic law enforcement ("criminal and civil").

When the eyes have it

At times in our past we've allowed the authorities to curtail liberty at home. It's always been justified on the basis of national security, and always will be. Looking back -- at the Alien and Sedition Acts of the early 1800s and the internments of World War II, for example -- these have not been proud moments. Americans, however, have always pulled back from the brink, back toward liberty.

Now the matter of the spy satellites offers another chance. This program blurs too many civilian-military lines, and sets precedents for ever more acute technological intrusions. Implicitly, it gives officials sweeping new powers (think of life under the satellite "eyes" of some future president you don't think much of). It unbalances the equation between security and liberty. It goes too far.

Are we still Americans that the men who drafted and ratified the Bill of Rights would recognize? Pushed, prodded and spied on from space, we have to wonder.


---------------------------------------------------------------------------= -------------------------
  World Class, Professional, Ethical, and Competent Bug Sweeps, and
Wiretap Detection using Sophisticated Laboratory Grade Test Equipment.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------= -------------------------
 James M. Atkinson           &= nbsp;           &nbs= p;      Phone:  (978) 546-3803
 Granite Island Group           &nbs= p;            &= nbsp; Fax:      (978) 546-9467
 127 Eastern Avenue #291            = ;     Web:    http://www.tscm.com/  Gloucester, MA 01931-8008           = ;   E-mail:  mailto:jm..._at_tscm.com<= br> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------= -------------------------
 We perform bug sweeps like it's a full contact sport, we take no prisoners,
and we give no quarter. Our goal is to simply, and completely stop the spy.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------= -------------------------

Received on Sat Mar 02 2024 - 00:57:28 CST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Mar 02 2024 - 01:11:46 CST