From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Jun 1 00:18:21 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id AAA25572; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 00:17:24 -0700 Resent-Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 00:17:24 -0700 Reply-To: From: "Keith Nagel" To: Subject: RE: Barn roof free energy Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 03:23:04 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <005b01c0ea5d$bc71b300$c995fc9e computer> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Importance: Normal Resent-Message-ID: <"zySFm3.0.IF6._5q5x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/42925 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Hi Fred. Capacity is more like .25 farads, total stored energy 20GJ. There be energy there. All you need do is complete the circuit (hehe). K. -----Original Message----- From: Frederick Sparber [mailto:fjsparber earthlink.net] Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 1:43 AM To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Barn roof free energy ----- Original Message ----- From: "Keith Nagel" To: Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 10:00 PM Subject: RE: Barn roof free energy Keith wrote: > > I suspect the resistive component of capacity(roof-ionosphere) > dominates, making the earth-ionosphere look like a high resistance source. > Change in earths potential occur over low frequencies, and > as you point out the capacity is quite small. By the way, how > did you come to the value 5E-15? C = (keo/60 km) * 30 meter^2 ie., the area of Frank's roof, :-) or ~ 1.623E-16 farad/meter^2 > > The total ESR of the capacity(earth-ionosphere) is ~200 ohms. Right. 400, 000 volts/2,000 amperes, is 200 ohms. > Local conditions vary greatly depending on a variety of things. > Power dissipated is 650 megawatts, just to keep things charged. Yes, but Total C (ionospere-earth) is 0.08 farad. thus potential energy (1/2 CV^2 ) is about 6.5 Gigawatts, replenished at 2000 coulombs/sec. > Mostly I think this is accomplished by storms. Or storms are replenished by Solar Insolation. > > You should work some resistors into that vac tube model, Fred. > Not just the DMM's... Just did. :-) Regards, Frederick > > K. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Frederick Sparber [mailto:fjsparber earthlink.net] > Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 8:47 PM > To: vortex-l eskimo.com > Cc: jlsparber earthlink.net; Deubedoo@aol.com > Subject: Re: Barn roof free energy > > > After careful calculation the "free energy" from the roof of > Frank's Little Red Barn: > > Capacitance from roof to ionosphere ~ 5E-15 farad, the capacitance of the 30 > meter^2 > roof at ~ 3.0 meters height, ~ 1.0E-10 farad. 400,000 volts across this > series > capacitance gives ~ 20 volts from the roof to ground. > > Thus energy w = 1/2 CV^2 = 5E-11*400 = 2.0E-8 joule. > > http://www.aladdinpower.com/products.htm > > This hand-powered generator can beat that, hands down, so speak. :-) > > Regards, Frederick > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Jun 1 01:07:05 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id BAA01101; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 01:05:41 -0700 Resent-Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 01:05:41 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: temalloy metro.lakes.com (Unverified) Message-Id: Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 03:04:25 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: thomas malloy Subject: Quantum Vacuum Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Resent-Message-ID: <"uaIx63.0.7H.Lpq5x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/42926 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: I'm disappointed that my previous posting on this thread failed to elicit any response. However Pat Bailey did respond. Quantum Vacuum, QVF, are the quantum vacuum fluctuations that Puthoff, et al, have theorized about. With that said, does anyone know of any examples of the use of QVF to manipulate matter? As I understand it, Puthoff thinks that QVF can be utilized to make a space drive possible. Then there is Tom Bearden. Tom Bearden told me that his machine was capable of demonstrating OU energy production by heating water. Unfortunately Tom has yet to do this for either Pat or myself. Tom's endless talking, and failure to give a demonstration, irritates Pat. Another question that comes to mind are the nature of curl free magnetic vector potentials, CFMVP? Puthoff was granted a patent about two years ago for a communication system that utilized CFMVP. It immediately occurred to me, that if these waves could go down a conductive medium, wire or glass fibre, it would have the effect of doubling the bandwith on the existing Internet. Unfortunately Puthoff's patent utilized Josephson Junctures to detect the waves. The trouble with Josephson Junctures is the liquid nitrogen required to get them to operating temperature. This is a problem which will probably make is impossible to commercialize Puthoff's patent. Two questions, Can anyone explain the nature of CFMVP to me. Can anyone think of any other detection system other than Josephson Junctures? From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Jun 1 01:16:27 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id BAA01150; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 01:06:02 -0700 Resent-Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 01:06:02 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: temalloy metro.lakes.com (Unverified) Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <000801c0ea01$2c1d52c0$1f962640 bear> References: <000801c0ea01$2c1d52c0$1f962640 bear> Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 03:04:25 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: thomas malloy Subject: RE: Egad! No More Martians? Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Resent-Message-ID: <"LwhIv1.0.tH.gpq5x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/42927 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: >As I suspected. >An interesting geological feature. >Now, could we get a close up of the "glass worms" and the "tractor tracks" ? > > >Matthew Rogers >Prove it.. I have spent many hours listening to Richard Hoagland on the Art Bell Program. As he drew out in this book, there is a field full of formations in the vicinity of the formation in question, FIQ,. First of all the other formations appear to be pyramids and they are placed so that their points can be connected with lines to give certain mathematical relationships. In addition, the FIQ is bisymmetrical, this bisymmetrity is especially noticable if you factor in the effects of wind erosion. Ten years ago, in a speach to the UN, Hoagland also predicted that the FIQ would prove to be leonian, My first reaction, on seeing the FIQ in Hoagland's book was that it looked to me like the Sphinx. Bottom line, I believe Hoagland. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Jun 1 05:27:56 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id FAA20803; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 05:26:39 -0700 Resent-Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 05:26:39 -0700 Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 08:33:08 -0400 (EDT) From: John Schnurer To: Keith Nagel cc: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: eneneerere Barn roof free energy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Resent-Message-ID: <"j1W0d1.0.u45._du5x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/42928 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: A method to try: Make a low leakage high quality set of leyden jars by drying glass jugs... must heat them to drive off bound water to about 180 F for 45 min... or, better yet, go up to 250 in oven really slowly.... When these clean jars are dry, the use a GOOD non pigmented lacquer or shellac with as little junk in it... plasticizers, un reacted mono mers... Use foil for the outside electrode, salt water for inside... BE CAREFUL... a bank of these can easily be lethal ... Set them up with a mechanical switch with a long glass rod stand off that performs make and break into the HV secondary of a neon sign transformer BUT BE SURE TO CUT THE CENTER TAP TO CASE GROUND !!!!!! ..... the low voltage promary is you power pick off. Use GOOD lightning arrestor and other of the like. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Jun 1 07:08:18 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id HAA20456; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 07:06:32 -0700 Resent-Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 07:06:32 -0700 Message-ID: <007601c0ea9b$5acba5a0$c995fc9e computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: Cc: References: Subject: Re: Barn roof free energy Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 08:04:08 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Resent-Message-ID: <"yhhsm3.0.W_4.d5w5x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/42929 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: ----- Original Message ----- From: "Keith Nagel" To: Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 2:23 AM Subject: RE: Barn roof free energy Keith wrote: > Hi Fred. > > Capacity is more like .25 farads, total stored energy 20GJ. That's what yo get if you figure the capacitance based on 20 km to ionosphere instead of 60 km: (keo/20 km)* area of Earth (5E14m^2). > > There be energy there. Yep. 20GJ is about 5 times the output of a 4 Gigawatt power plant (Palo Verde Nuclear) or Glenn Canyon Hydro. > > All you need do is complete the circuit (hehe). A thunderstorm comes close to doing that. :-) Regards, Frederick > > K. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Frederick Sparber [mailto:fjsparber earthlink.net] > Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 1:43 AM > To: vortex-l eskimo.com > Subject: Re: Barn roof free energy > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Keith Nagel" > To: > Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 10:00 PM > Subject: RE: Barn roof free energy > > Keith wrote: > > > > I suspect the resistive component of capacity(roof-ionosphere) > > dominates, making the earth-ionosphere look like a high resistance source. > > Change in earths potential occur over low frequencies, and > > as you point out the capacity is quite small. By the way, how > > did you come to the value 5E-15? > > C = (keo/60 km) * 30 meter^2 ie., the area of Frank's roof, :-) or ~ > 1.623E-16 > farad/meter^2 > > > > The total ESR of the capacity(earth-ionosphere) is ~200 ohms. > > Right. 400, 000 volts/2,000 amperes, is 200 ohms. > > Local conditions vary greatly depending on a variety of things. > > Power dissipated is 650 megawatts, just to keep things charged. > > Yes, but Total C (ionospere-earth) is 0.08 farad. thus > potential energy (1/2 CV^2 ) is about 6.5 Gigawatts, replenished at 2000 > coulombs/sec. > > Mostly I think this is accomplished by storms. > > Or storms are replenished by Solar Insolation. > > > > You should work some resistors into that vac tube model, Fred. > > Not just the DMM's... > > Just did. :-) > > Regards, Frederick > > > > K. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Frederick Sparber [mailto:fjsparber earthlink.net] > > Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 8:47 PM > > To: vortex-l eskimo.com > > Cc: jlsparber earthlink.net; Deubedoo@aol.com > > Subject: Re: Barn roof free energy > > > > > > After careful calculation the "free energy" from the roof of > > Frank's Little Red Barn: > > > > Capacitance from roof to ionosphere ~ 5E-15 farad, the capacitance of the > 30 > > meter^2 > > roof at ~ 3.0 meters height, ~ 1.0E-10 farad. 400,000 volts across this > > series > > capacitance gives ~ 20 volts from the roof to ground. > > > > Thus energy w = 1/2 CV^2 = 5E-11*400 = 2.0E-8 joule. > > > > http://www.aladdinpower.com/products.htm > > > > This hand-powered generator can beat that, hands down, so speak. :-) > > > > Regards, Frederick > > > > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Jun 1 08:35:59 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id IAA20243; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 08:32:28 -0700 Resent-Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 08:32:28 -0700 Message-ID: <3B17B5A9.3C4DFE5F bellsouth.net> Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2001 11:32:57 -0400 From: Terry Blanton X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: New Atomic Fuel Plant Increases Terrorism Risk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"flNd51.0.9y4.BMx5x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/42930 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: http://www.newscientist.com/dailynews/news.jsp?id=ns9999811 From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Jun 1 09:00:19 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id IAA30268; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 08:56:26 -0700 Resent-Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 08:56:26 -0700 Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20010601115050.0294c120 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2001 11:56:33 -0400 To: vortex-L eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: Japanese village derails MOX fuel plan Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <"HtZTF2.0.pO7.fix5x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/42931 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: The big story on Japanese television and the newspaper news last week was about a village named Kariwamura, 185 miles northwest of Tokyo, with 4,000 registered voters. It is close to the Kashiwasaki-Kariwa nuclear plant. In 1999, the government and Tokyo Electric Power company announced plans to burn recycled plutonium-uranium (MOX) fuel in plant #3, a 106 MW BWR Toshiba reactor installed in 1987. Last year, a group of citizens became concerned about the health, safety and nuclear proliferation problems with MOX fuel. In mid-May, the village held a plebiscite and by a narrow margin, it rejected the plans. The Tokyo government and the power company went into a tizzy, and sent out troops of experts who bowed and scrapped, apologized, begged and pleaded on prime-time television special news reports, but the opposition group, led by a housewife, is sticking with its decision. The Yomiuri and other newspapers quote the power company as saying they will do everything they can to "clear up the confusion" and win the trust of local people. They say it would be "difficult to proceed" without local support. Third party observers say "as a practical matter it would be impossible to proceed." This sort of imbroglio is traditional in Japanese politics and organizations, in which power flows up and decisions must be approved at lower levels after extensive consultation ("nemawashi"). This tends to paralyze the decision making process and derail programs arrived at in formal, democratic forums such as the Parliament. Historically, a great of mischief has been caused by unauthorized, low level people who took matters into their own hands and defied authority, especially the assassination of two prime ministers in 1930s, the attempted coup d'etat of 1936, the wars in Manchuria and China from 1931 to 1945 and the brief war with Russia in 1939. On the other hand, this makes for amusing and compelling television drama. It is fun to watch bigwigs and technoid power company engineers pleading with fat, middle-aged housewives on national television. In the U.S., the state of Nevada and citizens groups are fighting to prevent the use of the Yucca Mountain nuclear waste repository. According to the law that established the repository, the U.S. Congress may vote to overrule the state in the year 2004. Such a one-sided exercise of central power would be unthinkable in Japan. According to most sources, MOX fuel will cost 2 to 6 times more than conventional uranium fuel. Why they want to use the stuff is beyond me. It would seem the voters of Kariwamura have done the power company a big favor. See: http://cns.miis.edu/pubs/npr/katahara.htm Richard J. Samuels, The Business of the Japanese State: Energy markets in Comparative and Historical Perspective (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1987). R. Manning, "PACATOM: Nuclear Cooperation in Asia," pp. 221-222. - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Jun 1 09:51:16 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id JAA16460; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 09:47:39 -0700 Resent-Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 09:47:39 -0700 Message-ID: <009f01c0eab1$dd657a20$c995fc9e computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: Cc: Subject: Re: It looks like NASA's underwear is showing Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 10:45:07 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0005_01C0EA87.EC7A5AA0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Resent-Message-ID: <"ICJEQ3.0.w04.gSy5x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/42932 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C0EA87.EC7A5AA0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit It figures. :-) http://www.cnn.com/2001/TECH/space/06/01/tito.report/index.html ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C0EA87.EC7A5AA0 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="CNN.com - Tito Manned missions do little for science - June 1, 2001.url" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="CNN.com - Tito Manned missions do little for science - June 1, 2001.url" [DEFAULT] BASEURL=http://www.cnn.com/2001/TECH/space/06/01/tito.report/index.html [DOC#35] BASEURL=http://toolbar.netscape.com/tw_hat/iframe/cnn.html ORIGURL=http://toolbar.netscape.com/tw_hat/iframe/cnn.html [InternetShortcut] URL=http://www.cnn.com/2001/TECH/space/06/01/tito.report/index.html Modified=E0C5EF88B1EAC00178 ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C0EA87.EC7A5AA0-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Jun 1 10:00:23 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id JAA21037; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 09:59:32 -0700 Resent-Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 09:59:32 -0700 From: "Matthew Rogers" To: Subject: RE: Egad! No More Martians? Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 09:59:16 -0700 Message-ID: <000901c0eabc$31c35510$1f962640 bear> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal Resent-Message-ID: <"i6-v1.0.a85.pdy5x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/42933 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Thomas, Interesting. You dismiss the scientific method, and instead go with what you believe to be true from what someone else says. At this point you are not being objective, and are relying on what another person says. I agree with quite a few things HR says. In this one instance, this Mesa looks just like a mesa. If you can trick the camera, you can also trick the eye. Humans have the ability to impose familiar patterns on objects that have none. Clouds, Stars, dirt, stains on fabric, and Chemical formations. It is a natural part of our brain doing its job. So all I am saying, is lets photograph the other interesting features with higher detail. I would like to see the Tubes and the Bushes, which will probably turn out to be mineral formations. There is interesting formations on the moon called Rill's, long even hills, that turn out to be natural geological formations. There is no conspiracy of keeping information from the public, only a political agenda to cover their ass so they can keep their funding and jobs. I think that a Lunar base should come before solar system exploration, specifically to begin mining fuel on the moon, as well as building a electromagnetic launcher to launch payloads on the moon into space. Then we could explore asteroids in our neighborhood. That is when we will have the ability to explore and live in the whole solar system. Should NASA do it? No not all, but a good portion of it should be in private industry. The average nickel-iron asteroid contains more metal than what has been mined in human history, and the Carbonaceous Chrondite ones will have all the feed stock for fuel, polymers and still have metal wealth in them too. If we truly want free energy to do work for us, the best place for that is in space. Matthew Rogers Prove it.. -----Original Message----- From: thomas malloy [mailto:temalloy metro.lakes.com] Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 1:04 AM To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: RE: Egad! No More Martians? >As I suspected. >An interesting geological feature. >Now, could we get a close up of the "glass worms" and the "tractor tracks" ? > > >Matthew Rogers >Prove it.. I have spent many hours listening to Richard Hoagland on the Art Bell Program. As he drew out in this book, there is a field full of formations in the vicinity of the formation in question, FIQ,. First of all the other formations appear to be pyramids and they are placed so that their points can be connected with lines to give certain mathematical relationships. In addition, the FIQ is bisymmetrical, this bisymmetrity is especially noticable if you factor in the effects of wind erosion. Ten years ago, in a speach to the UN, Hoagland also predicted that the FIQ would prove to be leonian, My first reaction, on seeing the FIQ in Hoagland's book was that it looked to me like the Sphinx. Bottom line, I believe Hoagland. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Jun 1 10:17:12 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id KAA26965; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 10:14:48 -0700 Resent-Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 10:14:48 -0700 Message-ID: <002501c0eab3$c9abd0e0$45181ad8 oemcomputer> From: "Bruce Meland" To: Subject: Fw: Tech report on hybrids from Oak Ridge National Lab Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 08:59:04 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Resent-Message-ID: <"6JhZ3.0.Bb6.8sy5x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/42934 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: -Subject: Tech report on hybrids from Oak Ridge National Lab >>The IEEE Vehicular Technology Society News for May 2001 reprints a 6 pp >>tech report with color pix on power converters, inverters, field weakening >>for PM motors, capacitors, series and parallel traction drives for hybrids, >>switch reluctance (SR) for cheaper, high traction drive. Original paper >>was presented at the Transportation Electronics Convergence Proceedings. >>The author of the paper is Donald J Adams, ORNL , title >>"Power Electronics and Electric Machinery--US Government's Role in PNGV." > > >Hi Vati, >Is there any chance you would have a copy of this report? >Thanks,,,, > >-Otmar > > We lost our corkscrew, and were compelled to live on > food and water for several days. W. C. Fields > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Jun 1 12:03:31 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id LAA01552; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 11:57:25 -0700 Resent-Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 11:57:25 -0700 Message-ID: <000601c0eaea$7e43e700$d13f8aac default> From: "Thomas D. Clark" To: "DEACH" , "vortex" Cc: "Thomas D. Clark" Subject: Plans for Gravition Power Plants In The Near Future Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 15:30:40 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3612.1700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3612.1700 X-Apparently-From: ConexTom aol.com Resent-Message-ID: <"j66fh3.0.7O.JM-5x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/42935 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Plans for Gravition Power Plants In The Near Future Graviton power plants can be used to replace nuclear power plants and other forms of unclean power, to make a safer and cleaner environment in the near future. To build graviton power plants international corporations and organizations (i.e. GTW, UN, Energy Companies) , can work together with national governments, and local corporations to make new laws which regulate gravitonic power just like nuclear power, so that the power can be commercialized and utilized to make gravitonic power plants. It may also be possible to make laws which allow gravitonic power or similar clean forms of power to be used in local environments such as in the home or in the car within a legal set of parameters. The large energy companies can use their resources to build gravitonic power plants, and make just as much money off of them as they do in other forms of energy such as oil. Also these gravitonic power plants can be used to make force fields to be used commercially by security agencies to protect the privacy rights of corporate executives, government agencies and personnel, and citizens. If anyone has an recommendations to improve or clarify the above notions, please send me an email at tom rhfweb.com From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Jun 1 12:29:34 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id MAA12901; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 12:27:28 -0700 Resent-Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 12:27:28 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: rick mail.highsurf.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <000901c0eabc$31c35510$1f962640 bear> References: <000901c0eabc$31c35510$1f962640 bear> Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 09:23:44 -1000 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Rick Monteverde Subject: RE: Egad! No More Martians? Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Resent-Message-ID: <"GBoXJ.0.R93.Uo-5x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/42936 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Matthew - >Humans have the ability to impose familiar patterns on objects that have >none. Clouds, Stars, dirt, stains on fabric, and Chemical formations. It is >a natural part of our brain doing its job Its bilateral symmetry is very good and highly unusual, and still tends indicate the possibility of artificiality. I see no change in that between the early photos (properly analyzed and geometrically corrected) and these latest. But those 'glass tubes' are so obviously sand dunes in a channel, your argument above is ... too gentle? Anyone's brain says it's 'doing it's job' should be fired on the spot and removed from the premesis in the company of security guards if it tells them they're looking at a glass covered conduit of some sort. Of course RH figured out Europa's ocean as a possible life habitat, and the 19.5 degree hotspot deal too. Have you ever seen such genius mixed with such blank-eyed stupidity? Maybe Newton the astrologer? - Rick Monteverde Honolulu, HI From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Jun 1 12:42:47 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id MAA16361; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 12:38:35 -0700 Resent-Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 12:38:35 -0700 Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2001 12:36:10 -0700 From: Jones Beene Subject: "Black Silicon" for solar cells To: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-to: jonesb9 pacbell.net Message-id: <0GE900C60NUB8L mta5.snfc21.pbi.net> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Opera 5.11 build 904 Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Resent-Message-ID: <"U82n61.0.Z_3.wy-5x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/42937 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: The desire to get "off the grid" by using solar energy (or anything else for that matter) has been the fervent wish of many Americans but the high cost and other inconveniences of that proposition have been far enough removed from a fair tradeoff that taking that drastic step has previously been only justified the few for whom economics was not the main issue. Things could be changing however. The following technology represents a step that is said to lead directly to a doubling or more in the possible efficiency of silicon cells. See: http://mazur-www.harvard.edu/research/blacksilicon.html >From that website: "The irradiation of silicon surfaces with femtosecond laser pulses in the presence of a halogen containing gas transforms the flat, mirror-like surface of a silicon wafer into a forest of microscopic spikes. The spiked surface is strongly light-absorbing: the surface of silicon, normally gray and shiny, turns deep black. The spikes are tens of micrometers tall and have tip sizes on the order of hundreds of nanometers." Sounds like this structural shape would also make a good substrate for a cold cathode if it could be implemented onto a conductor. The following link is for a Google search that will lead to more information on this exiciting step foward in solar utiliztion: http://www.google.com/search?num=30&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q=+%22black +silicon%22+solar+cell&btnG=Google+Search Regards, Jones Beene From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Jun 1 13:55:21 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id NAA09978; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 13:50:50 -0700 Resent-Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 13:50:50 -0700 Message-ID: <3B180026.7DF79F8B suite224.net> Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2001 16:50:46 -0400 From: "Francis J. Stenger" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Win95; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: It looks like NASA's underwear is showing References: <009f01c0eab1$dd657a20$c995fc9e computer> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"2Ejvs3.0.kR2.g006x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/42938 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Frederick Sparber wrote: > > It figures. :-) Hey, Fred, I don't know about you but I think I'm ready to start a petition to have Tito appointed head of NASA! Frank Stenger PS: I've been doing a field research job to determine the average diameter of "standard" 48" inch, 40 watt fluorescent tubes. I have one GE tube that's just about 1.50 inch OD. However, I see that a batch of Phillips tubes I have are more like 1.48 inch OD. I plan to use lengths of these tubes as vacuum chambers in "FRANK'S HIGH VACUUM LAB", now under construction. I've found a good way to cut these tubes via a score with a carbide lathe tool bit and a follow-up final break with a hot-wire heater. Who says this list is not about hard science?? :-) From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Jun 1 15:40:55 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id PAA13931; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 15:31:05 -0700 Resent-Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 15:31:05 -0700 Message-ID: <3B181775.135523B2 ix.netcom.com> Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2001 15:30:13 -0700 From: Akira Kawasaki X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en]C-CCK-MCD NSCPCD472 (Win95; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Vortex Subject: [Fwd: What's New for Jun 01, 2001] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"7ZYg81.0.bP3.fU16x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/42939 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: -------- Original Message -------- Subject: What's New for Jun 01, 2001 Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 17:34:46 -0400 (EDT) From: "What's New" To: aki ix.netcom.com WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 01 Jun 01 Washington, DC 1. CONGRESS: THIS WAS THE WEEK THAT WASN'T. With the Democrats preparing to take over the Senate officially next Wednesday, last week's Congressional Calendar consisted largely of disruptions, chaos and cancellations. On Thursday, the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources heard Energy Secretary Abraham make the Administration's case for 90 minutes. Then, it suddenly adjourned, sending packing a bevy of industry VIPs, who had just flown in to testify on the Price-Anderson nuclear reactor liability issue. Fortunately, former White House Science Advisor and APS president D. Allan Bromley, who had been scheduled to speak about the R&D budget shortcomings, had received a head's up the day before and was able to cancel his trip in time. Witnesses beware: next week probably won't be any better. 2. MISSILE DEFENSE: THESE DAYS, YOU CAN'T EVEN BUY SUPPORTERS. The Kremlin this week reiterated its opposition to scrapping the 1972 ABM Treaty. The White House, however, is trying to arrange an arms deal with Russia, which has a way of changing minds (WN 18 May 01). Not surprisingly, Russia is interested in selling S- 300 missiles to the United States. Intended to intercept aircraft, the S-300 has been compared to the US Patriot. Do we really need another Patriot? In any case, persuading Russia to abandon the ABM Treaty is likely to be easier than selling the idea to our NATO allies, many of whom regard the ABM Treaty as "the cornerstone of strategic stability." But the real problem will be getting the support of a Senate controlled by Democrats. When the Democrats take over next Wednesday, Carl Levin (D-MI) will chair Armed Services. Levin stresses the need for R&D and predicts that a missile defense could not be deployed by the end of 2004. He scoffed at what he dubbed "the scarecrow defense." A White House spokesman had explained that a missile defense need not really work, but only create uncertainty (WN 4 May 01). 3. SPACE RACE: RUSSIA LEADS THE WAY IN COMMERCIALIZING THE ISS. "Space," they liked to say in the Reagan administration, "is just another place to do business." But who imagined it would be the Russians that would do it? Alas, it's hype, not science, that's being beamed back to Earth. With space tourism, Pizza Hut and now Radio Shack, the cash-starved Russians are showing the Americans that there really are ways to turn a buck on the ISS. 4. THE BELIEF GENE: IS CREDULITY ENCODED INTO HUMAN DNA? It's happened again. A notorious believer in cold fusion has revealed that he knows that magnet therapy works. At a meeting on UFOs, you'll find yourself in a room full of believers in everything from mental telepathy to homeopathy. Did belief confer some survival advantage on our primitive ancestors? Perhaps the Pleistocene forest was too scary to face without a belief in magic. The belief gene may cause more trouble than "fat gene." THE AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY (Note: Opinions are the author's and are not necessarily shared by the APS, but they should be.) From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Jun 1 15:41:58 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id PAA14310; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 15:32:51 -0700 Resent-Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 15:32:51 -0700 From: Robin van Spaandonk To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Plans for Gravition Power Plants In The Near Future Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2001 08:32:33 +1000 Organization: Improving Message-ID: References: <000601c0eaea$7e43e700$d13f8aac default> In-Reply-To: <000601c0eaea$7e43e700$d13f8aac default> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id PAA14271 Resent-Message-ID: <"6EDdt.0.TV3.HW16x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/42940 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: In reply to Thomas D. Clark's message of Fri, 1 Jun 2001 15:30:40 -0700: >Plans for Gravition Power Plants In The Near Future > >Graviton power plants can be used to replace nuclear power >plants and other forms of unclean power, to make a safer and >cleaner environment in the near future. First I would like to see any evidence at all, that such a thing even exists. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk A Future For Humanity see: http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ New model hydrogen atom see http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/New-hydrogen.html From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Jun 1 18:00:16 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id RAA27064; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 17:51:05 -0700 Resent-Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 17:51:05 -0700 Message-ID: <00e701c0eaf5$650223a0$c995fc9e computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: References: <009f01c0eab1$dd657a20$c995fc9e computer> <3B180026.7DF79F8B@suite224.net> Subject: Re: It looks like NASA's underwear is showing Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 18:48:35 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Resent-Message-ID: <"Ab5Y2.0.mc6.uX36x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/42941 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: ----- Original Message ----- From: "Francis J. Stenger" To: Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 3:50 PM Subject: Re: It looks like NASA's underwear is showing Frank Stenger wrote: > > Frederick Sparber wrote: > > > > It figures. :-) > > Hey, Fred, I don't know about you but I think I'm ready to start a > petition to have Tito appointed head of NASA! Think Mr. Goldin would mind? > > Frank Stenger > > PS: I've been doing a field research job to determine the average > diameter of "standard" 48" inch, 40 watt fluorescent tubes. > I have one GE tube that's just about 1.50 inch OD. However, I see > that a batch of Phillips tubes I have are more like 1.48 inch OD. A standard T12 tube is supposed to be 12*1/8 inches diameter, thus 1.5 inches. A Standard T4 is 4*1/8 inches diameter 0.5 inches and.... > I plan to use lengths of these tubes as vacuum chambers in > "FRANK'S HIGH VACUUM LAB", now under construction. I've found a good > way to cut these tubes via a score with a carbide lathe tool bit and > a follow-up final break with a hot-wire heater. Who says this list > is not about hard science?? :-) Right on, Frank. :-) Regards, Frederick > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Jun 1 23:24:25 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id XAA21151; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 23:23:57 -0700 Resent-Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 23:23:57 -0700 Message-ID: <000a01c0eb4a$6b60ff00$e1a8a3ac default> From: "Thomas D. Clark" To: "vortex" Cc: "Thomas D. Clark" Subject: Re: Plans for Gravition Power Plants In The Near Future-My Proof! Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2001 02:57:20 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3612.1700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3612.1700 X-Apparently-From: ConexTom aol.com Resent-Message-ID: <"sw0Yy.0.LA5.yP86x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/42942 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Thank you for your critique on gravity waves. I can prove that gravity waves exist in person, by meditation, telepathy, and telekinesis, but I can not yet show formally exactly how to generate and test for gravity waves by means of mechanical devices. I am working on this presently. I do know that secret organization due use gravity waves and generate them, but the technology is classified, since one can travel back in time with gravity waves and change history by means of remote viewing, as in CIA projects with psycics on remote viewing. So I am working on getting laws setup to allow for the technologies that generate gravity waves to be declassified and regulated to save the environment. I will list my best understanding of gravity waves below from an email I sent out: "Thank you for your comments on the graviton power plants. You asked me what is a graviton? A graviton is one of 4 to 6 gravity particles enclosed within quarks which are the building blocks of atomic particles. Gravitons generate gravity waves which are smaller and faster than light waves or electrons. Gravity waves are also called super light which travels about 100,000 times faster than light. Gravity waves may be collected by accelerating energy to frequencies higher than light with a Tesla amplifier coil. Gravity particles and waves are also horizontal waves like sound waves, whereas electromagnetic waves are vertical. Since there are gravity waves all around us, gravity waves provide unlimited sources of clean energy. Since gravity waves are smaller than all atomic particles they may pass through all substances, even the whole earth. As far as the power companies are concerned, I believe that they may be more concerned with the environment in the near future, than with profits, since if the environment is not healthy, they will make not profits at all. So the power companies may consider cleaner energies, in the near future, just to keep their customers around to make profits off of them in the long run rather than the short run. " I have about a half dozen books on pyramid power, zero point energies, and gravity physics which I am reading presently, and I may be able to piece together the facts and the technological process. I may also be able to hire researchers to prove the facts in the near future and then file patents and encourage legislation in the U.S. or in other more friendly countries. Logically to produce gravity waves if they exist, all one needs to do is generate waves smaller than light waves. And to test for gravity waves all one needs to do is to be able to measure waves smaller than light waves. Respectively, President, Thomas Clark Radiation Health Foundation (RHF) Inc., RHF Business web site at: http://www.rhfweb.com/ Personal website at http://www.rhfweb.com/personal New Age Media Productions at http://www.rhfweb.com/newage Email: tom rhfweb.com From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Jun 2 07:58:17 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id HAA23061; Sat, 2 Jun 2001 07:55:45 -0700 Resent-Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2001 07:55:45 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <000601c0eaea$7e43e700$d13f8aac default> References: <000601c0eaea$7e43e700$d13f8aac default> Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2001 09:56:06 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: thomas malloy Subject: Re: Plans for Gravition Power Plants In The Near Future Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Resent-Message-ID: <"OR3GX1.0.Ae5.nvF6x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/42944 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: >Plans for Gravition Power Plants In The Near Future > If you believe this I have some swamp land in central Minnesota that I'd like to sell you. OTOH, the Japanese are planning a gravitron conference. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Jun 2 07:58:21 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id HAA23010; Sat, 2 Jun 2001 07:55:33 -0700 Resent-Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2001 07:55:33 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <000901c0eabc$31c35510$1f962640 bear> References: <000901c0eabc$31c35510$1f962640 bear> Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2001 09:55:48 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: thomas malloy Subject: RE: Egad! No More Martians? Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Resent-Message-ID: <"cxJHs1.0.Sd5.bvF6x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/42943 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: >Thomas, > Interesting. You dismiss the scientific method, and instead >go with what >you believe to be true from what someone else says. >At this point you are not being objective, and are relying on what another >person says. I'm a firm believer in the scientific method. If you are interested, I will see what i can do to find a copy of Hoagland's photos and drawings of the "city". > >I agree with quite a few things HR says. In this one instance, this Mesa >looks just like a mesa. If you can trick the camera, you can also trick the >eye. It's more than just the photograph of the mesa, it's the interrelationships between the objects that make up the "city". Also it's the agenda of the people who are running NASA, which fits with worshipers of Lucifer. > >There is interesting formations on the moon called Rill's, long even hills, >that turn out to be natural geological formations. There are some very interesting features on the moon! > >There is no conspiracy of keeping information from the public, only a >political agenda to cover their ass so they can keep their funding and jobs. No Conspiracy! We fought them for 20 years to drag this information out! > >I think that a Lunar base should come before solar system exploration, >specifically to begin mining fuel on the moon, as well as building a >electromagnetic launcher to launch payloads on the moon into space. That assumes that the IG is going to allow us off of this planet. > >Then we could explore asteroids in our neighborhood. That is when we will >have the ability to explore and live in the whole solar system. Should NASA >do it? No not all, but a good portion of it should be in private industry. Don't hold you breath waiting for NASA to do it. They have dragged their feet and managed to do every thing in a manner that is so expensive that we could never afford it in any case. > >The average nickel-iron asteroid contains more metal than what has been >mined in human history, and the Carbonaceous Chrondite ones will have all >the feed stock for fuel, polymers and still have metal wealth in them too. I agree, but nothing is going to happen until we have a cheap method of getting things into stable earth orbit. >If we truly want free energy to do work for us, the best place for that is >in space. > >Matthew Rogers >Prove it.. > > >Bottom line, I believe Hoagland. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Jun 2 12:26:38 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id MAA32034; Sat, 2 Jun 2001 12:24:40 -0700 Resent-Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2001 12:24:40 -0700 Message-ID: <000101c0eb8f$1838cc00$4c181ad8 oemcomputer> From: "Bruce Meland" To: Cc: , , Subject: Re: Barn roof free energy Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2001 10:47:49 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Resent-Message-ID: <"QL9X71.0.Sq7.urJ6x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/42945 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: I think you serious tinkerers would save a lot of time and money if you purchased the recent published book "The Free Energy Secrets of Cold Electricity by Dr. Peter Lindemann for about $37, includes shipping and handling. It can be purchased through their web site http://free-energy.cc It has most of the info on how to build a recieving one with some recent discovered Tesla and Gray patents and notes. .Bruce -----Original Message----- From: Frederick Sparber To: vortex-l eskimo.com Cc: jlsparber earthlink.net Date: Friday, June 01, 2001 7:09 AM Subject: Re: Barn roof free energy > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Keith Nagel" >To: >Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 2:23 AM >Subject: RE: Barn roof free energy > >Keith wrote: > >> Hi Fred. >> >> Capacity is more like .25 farads, total stored energy 20GJ. > >That's what yo get if you figure the capacitance based on >20 km to ionosphere instead of 60 km: > >(keo/20 km)* area of Earth (5E14m^2). >> >> There be energy there. > >Yep. 20GJ is about 5 times the output of a 4 Gigawatt power plant (Palo Verde Nuclear) >or Glenn Canyon Hydro. >> >> All you need do is complete the circuit (hehe). > >A thunderstorm comes close to doing that. :-) > >Regards, Frederick >> >> K. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Frederick Sparber [mailto:fjsparber earthlink.net] >> Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 1:43 AM >> To: vortex-l eskimo.com >> Subject: Re: Barn roof free energy >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Keith Nagel" >> To: >> Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 10:00 PM >> Subject: RE: Barn roof free energy >> >> Keith wrote: >> > >> > I suspect the resistive component of capacity(roof-ionosphere) >> > dominates, making the earth-ionosphere look like a high resistance source. >> > Change in earths potential occur over low frequencies, and >> > as you point out the capacity is quite small. By the way, how >> > did you come to the value 5E-15? >> >> C = (keo/60 km) * 30 meter^2 ie., the area of Frank's roof, :-) or ~ >> 1.623E-16 >> farad/meter^2 >> > >> > The total ESR of the capacity(earth-ionosphere) is ~200 ohms. >> >> Right. 400, 000 volts/2,000 amperes, is 200 ohms. >> > Local conditions vary greatly depending on a variety of things. >> > Power dissipated is 650 megawatts, just to keep things charged. >> >> Yes, but Total C (ionospere-earth) is 0.08 farad. thus >> potential energy (1/2 CV^2 ) is about 6.5 Gigawatts, replenished at 2000 >> coulombs/sec. >> > Mostly I think this is accomplished by storms. >> >> Or storms are replenished by Solar Insolation. >> > >> > You should work some resistors into that vac tube model, Fred. >> > Not just the DMM's... >> >> Just did. :-) >> >> Regards, Frederick >> > >> > K. >> > >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: Frederick Sparber [mailto:fjsparber earthlink.net] >> > Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 8:47 PM >> > To: vortex-l eskimo.com >> > Cc: jlsparber earthlink.net; Deubedoo@aol.com >> > Subject: Re: Barn roof free energy >> > >> > >> > After careful calculation the "free energy" from the roof of >> > Frank's Little Red Barn: >> > >> > Capacitance from roof to ionosphere ~ 5E-15 farad, the capacitance of the >> 30 >> > meter^2 >> > roof at ~ 3.0 meters height, ~ 1.0E-10 farad. 400,000 volts across this >> > series >> > capacitance gives ~ 20 volts from the roof to ground. >> > >> > Thus energy w = 1/2 CV^2 = 5E-11*400 = 2.0E-8 joule. >> > >> > http://www.aladdinpower.com/products.htm >> > >> > This hand-powered generator can beat that, hands down, so speak. :-) >> > >> > Regards, Frederick >> > >> >> > > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Jun 2 13:38:27 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id NAA23217; Sat, 2 Jun 2001 13:35:47 -0700 Resent-Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2001 13:35:47 -0700 Message-ID: <014801c0eb9a$e40fb720$c995fc9e computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: Cc: , , References: <000101c0eb8f$1838cc00$4c181ad8 oemcomputer> Subject: Re: Barn roof free energy Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2001 14:33:17 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Resent-Message-ID: <"zAT5O2.0.bg5.YuK6x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/42946 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bruce Meland" To: Cc: ; ; Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2001 12:47 PM Subject: Re: Barn roof free energy Bruce, I think you would've been better off to have spent that $37.00 plus S & H on a "Shrink". :-) Regards, Frederick > I think you serious tinkerers would save a lot of time and money if you > purchased the recent published book "The Free Energy Secrets of Cold > Electricity by Dr. Peter Lindemann for about $37, includes shipping and > handling. It can be purchased through their web site http://free-energy.cc > It has most of the info on how to build a recieving one with some recent > discovered Tesla and Gray patents and notes. .Bruce > -----Original Message----- > From: Frederick Sparber > To: vortex-l eskimo.com > Cc: jlsparber earthlink.net > Date: Friday, June 01, 2001 7:09 AM > Subject: Re: Barn roof free energy > > > > > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: "Keith Nagel" > >To: > >Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 2:23 AM > >Subject: RE: Barn roof free energy > > > >Keith wrote: > > > >> Hi Fred. > >> > >> Capacity is more like .25 farads, total stored energy 20GJ. > > > >That's what yo get if you figure the capacitance based on > >20 km to ionosphere instead of 60 km: > > > >(keo/20 km)* area of Earth (5E14m^2). > >> > >> There be energy there. > > > >Yep. 20GJ is about 5 times the output of a 4 Gigawatt power plant (Palo > Verde Nuclear) > >or Glenn Canyon Hydro. > >> > >> All you need do is complete the circuit (hehe). > > > >A thunderstorm comes close to doing that. :-) > > > >Regards, Frederick > >> > >> K. > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Frederick Sparber [mailto:fjsparber earthlink.net] > >> Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 1:43 AM > >> To: vortex-l eskimo.com > >> Subject: Re: Barn roof free energy > >> > >> > >> > >> ----- Original Message ----- > >> From: "Keith Nagel" > >> To: > >> Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 10:00 PM > >> Subject: RE: Barn roof free energy > >> > >> Keith wrote: > >> > > >> > I suspect the resistive component of capacity(roof-ionosphere) > >> > dominates, making the earth-ionosphere look like a high resistance > source. > >> > Change in earths potential occur over low frequencies, and > >> > as you point out the capacity is quite small. By the way, how > >> > did you come to the value 5E-15? > >> > >> C = (keo/60 km) * 30 meter^2 ie., the area of Frank's roof, :-) or ~ > >> 1.623E-16 > >> farad/meter^2 > >> > > >> > The total ESR of the capacity(earth-ionosphere) is ~200 ohms. > >> > >> Right. 400, 000 volts/2,000 amperes, is 200 ohms. > >> > Local conditions vary greatly depending on a variety of things. > >> > Power dissipated is 650 megawatts, just to keep things charged. > >> > >> Yes, but Total C (ionospere-earth) is 0.08 farad. thus > >> potential energy (1/2 CV^2 ) is about 6.5 Gigawatts, replenished at 2000 > >> coulombs/sec. > >> > Mostly I think this is accomplished by storms. > >> > >> Or storms are replenished by Solar Insolation. > >> > > >> > You should work some resistors into that vac tube model, Fred. > >> > Not just the DMM's... > >> > >> Just did. :-) > >> > >> Regards, Frederick > >> > > >> > K. > >> > > >> > -----Original Message----- > >> > From: Frederick Sparber [mailto:fjsparber earthlink.net] > >> > Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 8:47 PM > >> > To: vortex-l eskimo.com > >> > Cc: jlsparber earthlink.net; Deubedoo@aol.com > >> > Subject: Re: Barn roof free energy > >> > > >> > > >> > After careful calculation the "free energy" from the roof of > >> > Frank's Little Red Barn: > >> > > >> > Capacitance from roof to ionosphere ~ 5E-15 farad, the capacitance of > the > >> 30 > >> > meter^2 > >> > roof at ~ 3.0 meters height, ~ 1.0E-10 farad. 400,000 volts across > this > >> > series > >> > capacitance gives ~ 20 volts from the roof to ground. > >> > > >> > Thus energy w = 1/2 CV^2 = 5E-11*400 = 2.0E-8 joule. > >> > > >> > http://www.aladdinpower.com/products.htm > >> > > >> > This hand-powered generator can beat that, hands down, so speak. :-) > >> > > >> > Regards, Frederick > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Jun 2 17:22:02 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id RAA10371; Sat, 2 Jun 2001 17:21:09 -0700 Resent-Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2001 17:21:09 -0700 Message-ID: <000901c0ebe0$fe2f7aa0$0e2f99ac default> From: "Thomas D. Clark" To: "vortex" , "DEACH" Cc: "Thomas D. Clark" Subject: 14x10^12EV=Gravity Waves by smashing Quarks created from smashing Protons Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2001 20:55:10 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3612.1700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3612.1700 X-Apparently-From: ConexTom aol.com Resent-Message-ID: <"5DEzq3.0.zX2.rBO6x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/42947 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: 14x10^12EV=Gravity Waves by smashing Quarks created from smashing Protons In order to generate gravity waves one may smash protons together at 14 x10^8 EV to create quarks, and then smashing quarks together at 14 x 10^12 EV to create gravitons. When gravitons leave a quark they create gravity waves. One may simply use a coil and a magnet to accelerate the energy from a battery or capacitor to the higher energy level mentioned above to create gravity waves. Also electric waves may be considered as 1 dimensional rotations of photons (a disk) and magnetic waves may be considered as 2 dimensional rotations of photons ( a sphere), and hence gravity waves may be considered 3 dimensional rotations of photons ( a fractal\toroid\spiral?).There may be anywhere from 6 to 16 gravitons in a quark. I discovered the above information by noticing that the size of a electron is 10cm^-8, the size of a qaurk is 10cm ^ -12, the size of a Graviton is 10cm ^ -13. Since 14 x 10^8EV may be used to smash protons, and electrons are 4 to 5 larger than gravitons, then one must increase the energy by 4 to 5 times. Also certain thoughts (probabilities of belief and intensity) and images or geometries may also excite qaurks to create gravity waves. Respectively, President, Thomas Clark Radiation Health Foundation (RHF) Inc., RHF Business web site at: http://www.rhfweb.com/ Personal website at http://www.rhfweb.com/personal New Age Media Productions at http://www.rhfweb.com/newage Email: tom rhfweb.com From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Jun 2 17:39:17 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id RAA14170; Sat, 2 Jun 2001 17:38:42 -0700 Resent-Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2001 17:38:42 -0700 Message-ID: <000401c0ebe3$3f3ade20$0e2f99ac default> From: "Thomas D. Clark" To: "vortex" , "DEACH" Cc: "Thomas D. Clark" Subject: 14x10^12EV=Gravity Waves by smashing Quarks by smashing Protons Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2001 21:10:25 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3612.1700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3612.1700 X-Apparently-From: ConexTom aol.com Resent-Message-ID: <"L50O81.0.GT3.ISO6x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/42948 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: 14x10^12EV=Gravity Waves by smashing Quarks by smashing Protons In order to generate gravity waves one may smash protons togethor at 14 x10^8 EV to create quarks, and then smashing quarks togethor at 14 x 10^12 EV to create gravitons. When gravitons leave a quark the create gravity waves. One may simply use a coil and a magnetic to accelerte the energy from a battery or capacitor to the highe energy level mentioned above to create gravity waves. Also electric waves may be considered as 1 dimensional rotations of photons (a disk) and magnetic waves may be considered 2 dimeinsonal rotatios of photons ( a sphere), and hence gravity waves may be considered 3 dimensional rotations of photons ( a fractal\toroid\spiral?).There may be anyhwere from 6 to 16 gravitons in a quark. I discovered the above information by noticing that the size of a electron is 10cm^-8, the size of a qaurk is 10cm ^ -12, the size of a Graviton is 10cm ^ - 13. Since 14 x 10^8EV may be used to smash protons, and electrons are 4 to 5 larger than gravitons, then one must increase the energy by 4 to 5 times.Also certain thoughts (probabilities of belief and intensity) and images or geometries may also excite qaurks to create gravity waves. Respectively, President, Thomas Clark Radiation Health Foundation (RHF) Inc., RHF Business web site at: http://www.rhfweb.com/ Personal website at http://www.rhfweb.com/personal New Age Media Productions at http://www.rhfweb.com/newage Email: tom rhfweb.com From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Jun 2 19:28:39 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id TAA10458; Sat, 2 Jun 2001 19:28:00 -0700 Resent-Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2001 19:28:00 -0700 From: Robin van Spaandonk To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Plans for Gravition Power Plants In The Near Future-My Proof! Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2001 12:27:25 +1000 Organization: Improving Message-ID: <9q7jht0n71m0nlem5rvhgdeuseg55na876 4ax.com> References: <000a01c0eb4a$6b60ff00$e1a8a3ac default> In-Reply-To: <000a01c0eb4a$6b60ff00$e1a8a3ac default> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id TAA10429 Resent-Message-ID: <"mly4N1.0.KZ2.m2Q6x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/42949 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: In reply to Thomas D. Clark's message of Sat, 2 Jun 2001 02:57:20 -0700: [snip] >"Thank you for your comments on the graviton power plants. >You asked me what is a graviton? A graviton is one of 4 to 6 >gravity particles enclosed within quarks which are the building >blocks of atomic particles. Gravitons generate gravity waves >which are smaller and faster than light waves or electrons. How big is a light wave? >Gravity waves are also called super light which travels about >100,000 times faster than light. Gravity waves may be collected >by accelerating energy to frequencies with a >Tesla amplifier coil. What is a frequency "higher than light", or are you referring to frequencies high than that of visible light? [snip] >Gravity particles and waves are also >horizontal waves like sound waves, whereas electromagnetic >waves are vertical. No, the orientation of electromagnetic waves depends on the orientation of the transmitting antenna (for radio at least). >Since there are gravity waves all around us, >gravity waves provide unlimited sources of clean energy. Since >gravity waves are smaller than all atomic particles they may pass >through all substances, even the whole earth. Then they will probably also pass right through your detector, no? [snip] Regards, Robin van Spaandonk A Future For Humanity see: http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ New model hydrogen atom see http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/New-hydrogen.html From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Jun 2 19:49:30 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id TAA18894; Sat, 2 Jun 2001 19:47:07 -0700 Resent-Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2001 19:47:07 -0700 From: ConexTom aol.com Message-ID: <65.1547c792.284aff04 aol.com> Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2001 22:46:28 EDT Subject: Fwd: Candidate for universal gravitational glue To: vortex-l eskimo.com, DEACH@topica.com CC: tom rhfweb.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="part1_65.1547c792.284aff04_boundary" X-Mailer: AOL 6.0 for Windows US sub 10513 Resent-Message-ID: <"Q2HOz1.0.7d4.hKQ6x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/42950 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: --part1_65.1547c792.284aff04_boundary Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_65.1547c792.284aff04_alt_boundary" --part1_65.1547c792.284aff04_alt_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subj: Fw: Candidate for universal gravitational glue =20 Date: 6/2/01 11:41:42 AM Pacific Daylight Time =20 From:=A0 =A0 etimes teleport.com (Bruce Meland) To:=A0 =A0 tom rhfweb.com CC:=A0 =A0 conextom aol.com =20 Hi Tom I believe some form of these neutrinos are the gravity particles. Bru= ce Candidate for universal gravitational glue=20 UPI Science News Thursday June 4 9:34 PM EDT TAKAYAMA, Japan, June 5 (UPI) -= =20 Researchers say they have identifed what may be the unseen gravitational glu= e=20 _ the so-called dark matter responsible in part for the evolution of the=20 universe from the moment of its birth: neutrinos. A serious candidate for=20 this glue, neutrinos are invisible, sub- atomic particles, created at the=20 time of the Big Bang, that stream through the Earth, people and everything=20 else unfettered. The groundbreaking discovery, announced Friday in Japan by=20 an international team of scientists, was that neutrinos have mass. Because=20 the particles fill the universe, scientists say, collectively they may have=20 the force to reverse its expansive course to cause the ``Big Crunch.'' So=20 fundamental a discovery, they said at Neutrino '98, an international physics= =20 conference in Takayama, Japan, could help explain baffling puzzles about the= =20 nature of matter and the formation of the universe after the Big Bang. The=20 discovery was the result of a two year, $100 million experiment by an=20 international team of scientists. Dr. John G. Learned, a University of Hawai= i=20 physicist and one of the lead researchers, told United Press International,=20 the discovery means neutrinos may account for the many gravitational forces=20 apparent in astronomical observations that no one has ever been able to=20 explain. ``This will go down as perhaps the one most important discovery in=20 science in the decade,'' he said Thursday. ``It means that neutrinos are=20 surely one of the more massive components of the universe.'' Dr. David=20 Casper, a University of California-Irvine physicist and another team member,= =20 agreed, asserting the finding will help scientists understand ``how galaxies= =20 and other large scale structures in the universe interact gravitationally.''= =20 Until now, he said, scientists have been puzzled about the movements of the=20 heavens, knowing that something was missing from their calculations, and=20 describing the unknown variable as ``dark'' or ``missing'' matter. This=20 discovery, Learned said, suggests that neutrinos have an aggregate=20 gravitational influence that may eventually be sufficient to reverse the=20 universal expansion triggered by the Big Bang and cause a ``Big Crunch.''=20 ``The discovery of neutrino mass is intimately connected with both the=20 origins and ultimate fate of the universe,'' Casper said. ``We suspected but= =20 did not know that neutrinos had tiny mass. We didn't think of them as making= =20 up a part of our world, but in fact, the universe is full of neutrinos. Ever= y=20 cubic centimeter of the universe has about 200 or so neutrinos, which are=20 left over from the Big Bang.'' The finding may also fill in the blanks in=20 equations aimed at solving how particles acquire mass, ``one of the deepest=20 unsolved questions of particle physics,'' Casper said. ``This will help=20 astronomers understand something that puzzles them greatly _ why is there=20 more gravitational force than they expect from the amount of stuff the can=20 see out there,'' Casper added. Learned says neutrinos, until now thought to=20 have no mass, may on the whole turn out to make up ``most of the mass of the= =20 universe. '' The discovery was made at Super-Kamiokande Observatory, the=20 world's largest elementary particle detector, northwest of Tokyo. Scientists= =20 from 23 institutions in the United States, Japan, Poland and Korea took part= .=20 The team included Dr. Henry Sobel, also of UC-Irvine. Neutrinos, similar to=20 electrons, have long been known to be a fundamental constituent of nature.=20 But unlike electrons, neutrinos carry no electric charge, and thus can pass=20 unimpeded through great distances in matter. This property, along with their= =20 invisibility, has made them extremely difficult to observe. Scientists have=20 suspected for years that neutrinos might have a very small, but non-zero,=20 mass, but never before could prove it. Casper said the discovery won't=20 ``change the life of the average Joe'' but has profound implications for=20 physicists and astrophysicsts. The finding also suggests, he said, that the=20 gravitational influence of neutrinos may have been a catalyst for the=20 collapse of the diffuse primordial gas into more dense regions that=20 eventually spawned galaxies, stars and planets. UC-Irvine issued a statement= =20 on behalf of its scientists asserting that the experiment had yielded=20 ``results that are outside the standard theory of particle physics, which=20 describes the fundamental constituents of matter and their interactions.=20 Until now, there has been no firm evidence that neutrinos possess mass.'' Th= e=20 evidence was based upon studies of neutrinos created when cosmic rays bombar= d=20 the Earth's upper atmosphere, producing storms of secndary particles that=20 rain down constantly from the heavens. Most neutrinos pass through the entir= e=20 planet unscathed, but have been detected passing through the Super-Kamiokand= e=20 group's 50,000-ton tank of purified water 1,000 meters beneath the surface.=20 The scientists noticed the neutrinos oscillated, or changed from one type of= =20 neutrino to another, something that could occur only if they have mass. They= =20 say in a joint statement that neutrinos ``must now be incorporated into the=20 theoretical models of the structure of matter and that astrophysicists=20 concerned with finding the 'missing' or 'dark matter' in the universe must=20 now consider the neutrino as a serious candidate.'' Neutrinos were created i= n=20 vast quantities in the first instants after the Big Bang and permeate the=20 universe, Casper said. ``Because these leftover neutrinos are everywhere,=20 even if they have a tiny mass, when you add them up, it adds up to something= =20 significant in terms of how galaxies and large scale structures in the=20 universe gravitationally interact,'' Casper said. ``You have a zillion thing= s=20 which by themselves have almost no mass, but when you add them all up, they=20 can have a large scale. This may now guide theorists in answering the big=20 question _ why does everything have mass?'' Learned said, ``this is=20 fundamental science on the most basic scale,'' and its practical application= s=20 might not become evident for many years. Copyright 1998 by United Press=20 International All rights reserved=20 Respectively, President, Thomas Clark Radiation Health Foundation (RHF) Inc., RHF Business web site at: http://www.rhfw= eb.com/ Personal website at http://www.rh= fweb.com/personal New Age Media Productions at http://www.rhfweb.com/newage Email: tom@rhfweb.com --part1_65.1547c792.284aff04_alt_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subj: Fw: Candidate=20= for universal gravitational glue =20
Date: 6/2/01 11:41:42 AM Pacific Daylight Time =20
From:=A0 =A0 etimes teleport.com (Bruce Meland)
To:=A0 =A0 tom rhfweb.com
CC:=A0 =A0 conextom aol.com
=20
Hi Tom I believe some form of these neutrinos are the gravity particles.= Bruce


Candidate for universal gravitational glue=20


UPI Science News Thursday June 4 9:34 PM EDT TAKAYAMA, J= apan, June 5 (UPI) -=20
Researchers say they have identifed what may be the unseen gravitational= glue=20
_ the so-called dark matter responsible in part for the evolution of the= =20
universe from the moment of its birth: neutrinos. A serious candidate fo= r=20
this glue, neutrinos are invisible, sub- atomic particles, created at th= e=20
time of the Big Bang, that stream through the Earth, people and everythi= ng=20
else unfettered. The groundbreaking discovery, announced Friday in Japan= by=20
an international team of scientists, was that neutrinos have mass. Becau= se=20
the particles fill the universe, scientists say, collectively they may h= ave=20
the force to reverse its expansive course to cause the ``Big Crunch.'' S= o=20
fundamental a discovery, they said at Neutrino '98, an international phy= sics=20
conference in Takayama, Japan, could help explain baffling puzzles about= the=20
nature of matter and the formation of the universe after the Big Bang. T= he=20
discovery was the result of a two year, $100 million experiment by an=20
international team of scientists. Dr. John G. Learned, a University of H= awaii=20
physicist and one of the lead researchers, told United Press Internation= al,=20
the discovery means neutrinos may account for the many gravitational for= ces=20
apparent in astronomical observations that no one has ever been able to=20
explain. ``This will go down as perhaps the one most important discovery= in=20
science in the decade,'' he said Thursday. ``It means that neutrinos are= =20
surely one of the more massive components of the universe.'' Dr. David=20
Casper, a University of California-Irvine physicist and another team mem= ber,=20
agreed, asserting the finding will help scientists understand ``how gala= xies=20
and other large scale structures in the universe interact gravitationall= y.''=20
Until now, he said, scientists have been puzzled about the movements of=20= the=20
heavens, knowing that something was missing from their calculations, and= =20
describing the unknown variable as ``dark'' or ``missing'' matter. This=20
discovery, Learned said, suggests that neutrinos have an aggregate=20
gravitational influence that may eventually be sufficient to reverse the= =20
universal expansion triggered by the Big Bang and cause a ``Big Crunch.'= '=20
``The discovery of neutrino mass is intimately connected with both the=20
origins and ultimate fate of the universe,'' Casper said. ``We suspected= but=20
did not know that neutrinos had tiny mass. We didn't think of them as ma= king=20
up a part of our world, but in fact, the universe is full of neutrinos.=20= Every=20
cubic centimeter of the universe has about 200 or so neutrinos, which ar= e=20
left over from the Big Bang.'' The finding may also fill in the blanks i= n=20
equations aimed at solving how particles acquire mass, ``one of the deep= est=20
unsolved questions of particle physics,'' Casper said. ``This will help=20
astronomers understand something that puzzles them greatly _ why is ther= e=20
more gravitational force than they expect from the amount of stuff the c= an=20
see out there,'' Casper added. Learned says neutrinos, until now thought= to=20
have no mass, may on the whole turn out to make up ``most of the mass of= the=20
universe. '' The discovery was made at Super-Kamiokande Observatory, the= =20
world's largest elementary particle detector, northwest of Tokyo. Scient= ists=20
from 23 institutions in the United States, Japan, Poland and Korea took=20= part.=20
The team included Dr. Henry Sobel, also of UC-Irvine. Neutrinos, similar= to=20
electrons, have long been known to be a fundamental constituent of natur= e.=20
But unlike electrons, neutrinos carry no electric charge, and thus can p= ass=20
unimpeded through great distances in matter. This property, along with t= heir=20
invisibility, has made them extremely difficult to observe. Scientists h= ave=20
suspected for years that neutrinos might have a very small, but non-zero= ,=20
mass, but never before could prove it. Casper said the discovery won't=20
``change the life of the average Joe'' but has profound implications for= =20
physicists and astrophysicsts. The finding also suggests, he said, that=20= the=20
gravitational influence of neutrinos may have been a catalyst for the=20
collapse of the diffuse primordial gas into more dense regions that=20
eventually spawned galaxies, stars and planets. UC-Irvine issued a state= ment=20
on behalf of its scientists asserting that the experiment had yielded=20
``results that are outside the standard theory of particle physics, whic= h=20
describes the fundamental constituents of matter and their interactions.= =20
Until now, there has been no firm evidence that neutrinos possess mass.'= ' The=20
evidence was based upon studies of neutrinos created when cosmic rays bo= mbard=20
the Earth's upper atmosphere, producing storms of secndary particles tha= t=20
rain down constantly from the heavens. Most neutrinos pass through the e= ntire=20
planet unscathed, but have been detected passing through the Super-Kamio= kande=20
group's 50,000-ton tank of purified water 1,000 meters beneath the surfa= ce.=20
The scientists noticed the neutrinos oscillated, or changed from one typ= e of=20
neutrino to another, something that could occur only if they have mass.=20= They=20
say in a joint statement that neutrinos ``must now be incorporated into=20= the=20
theoretical models of the structure of matter and that astrophysicists=20
concerned with finding the 'missing' or 'dark matter' in the universe mu= st=20
now consider the neutrino as a serious candidate.'' Neutrinos were creat= ed in=20
vast quantities in the first instants after the Big Bang and permeate th= e=20
universe, Casper said. ``Because these leftover neutrinos are everywhere= ,=20
even if they have a tiny mass, when you add them up, it adds up to somet= hing=20
significant in terms of how galaxies and large scale structures in the=20
universe gravitationally interact,'' Casper said. ``You have a zillion t= hings=20
which by themselves have almost no mass, but when you add them all up, t= hey=20
can have a large scale. This may now guide theorists in answering the bi= g=20
question _ why does everything have mass?'' Learned said, ``this is=20
fundamental science on the most basic scale,'' and its practical applica= tions=20
might not become evident for many years. Copyright 1998 by United Press=20
International All rights reserved=20

Respectively,

President, Thomas Clark
Radiation Health Foundation (RHF) Inc.,
RHF Business web site at: http://www.= rhfweb.com/
Personal website at http://ww= w.rhfweb.com/personal
New Age Media Productions at
http://www.rhfweb.com/newage
Email:
tom@rhfweb.com
--part1_65.1547c792.284aff04_alt_boundary-- --part1_65.1547c792.284aff04_boundary Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Return-Path: Received: from rly-zd04.mx.aol.com (rly-zd04.mail.aol.com [172.31.33.228]) by air-zd03.mail.aol.com (v77_r1.36) with ESMTP; Sat, 02 Jun 2001 14:41:42 -0400 Received: from extreme.highspeedweb.net (extreme.highspeedweb.net [204.181.10.113]) by rly-zd04.mx.aol.com (v78.43) with ESMTP; Sat, 02 Jun 2001 14:41:34 -0400 Received: (qmail 6887 invoked by uid 509); 2 Jun 2001 18:41:33 -0000 Delivered-To: tom rhfweb.com Received: (qmail 6880 invoked by uid 506); 2 Jun 2001 18:41:32 -0000 Received: from smtp-out003.onemain.com (HELO smtp04.mail.onemain.com) (63.208.208.73) by rhfweb.com with SMTP; 2 Jun 2001 18:41:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 25927 invoked from network); 2 Jun 2001 18:40:39 -0000 Received: from pm3-02-18.ben.du.teleport.com (HELO oemcomputer) ([216.26.24.146]) (envelope-sender ) by smtp04.mail.onemain.com (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 2 Jun 2001 18:40:39 -0000 Message-ID: <001a01c0eb89$15659680$92181ad8 oemcomputer> From: "Bruce Meland" To: Cc: Subject: Fw: Candidate for universal gravitational glue Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2001 10:25:53 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0017_01C0EB4E.6906BE80" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 ------=_NextPart_000_0017_01C0EB4E.6906BE80 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding:quoted-printable Hi Tom I believe some form of these neutrinos are the gravity particles. Bru= ce Candidate for universal gravitational glue=20 UPI Science News Thursday June 4 9:34 PM EDT=20 TAKAYAMA, Japan, June 5 (UPI) - Researchers say they have identifed what may= be the unseen gravitational glue _ the so-called dark matter responsible in= part for the evolution of the universe from the moment of its birth: neutri= nos.=20 A serious candidate for this glue, neutrinos are invisible, sub- atomic part= icles, created at the time of the Big Bang, that stream through the Earth, p= eople and everything else unfettered.=20 The groundbreaking discovery, announced Friday in Japan by an international=20= team of scientists, was that neutrinos have mass. Because the particles fill= the universe, scientists say, collectively they may have the force to rever= se its expansive course to cause the ``Big Crunch.''=20 So fundamental a discovery, they said at Neutrino '98, an international phys= ics conference in Takayama, Japan, could help explain baffling puzzles about= the nature of matter and the formation of the universe after the Big Bang.=20 The discovery was the result of a two year, $100 million experiment by an in= ternational team of scientists.=20 Dr. John G. Learned, a University of Hawaii physicist and one of the lead re= searchers, told United Press International, the discovery means neutrinos ma= y account for the many gravitational forces apparent in astronomical observa= tions that no one has ever been able to explain.=20 ``This will go down as perhaps the one most important discovery in science i= n the decade,'' he said Thursday. ``It means that neutrinos are surely one o= f the more massive components of the universe.''=20 Dr. David Casper, a University of California-Irvine physicist and another te= am member, agreed, asserting the finding will help scientists understand ``h= ow galaxies and other large scale structures in the universe interact gravit= ationally.''=20 Until now, he said, scientists have been puzzled about the movements of the=20= heavens, knowing that something was missing from their calculations, and des= cribing the unknown variable as ``dark'' or ``missing'' matter. This discove= ry, Learned said, suggests that neutrinos have an aggregate gravitational in= fluence that may eventually be sufficient to reverse the universal expansion= triggered by the Big Bang and cause a ``Big Crunch.'' ``The discovery of ne= utrino mass is intimately connected with both the origins and ultimate fate=20= of the universe,'' Casper said. ``We suspected but did not know that neutrin= os had tiny mass. We didn't think of them as making up a part of our world,=20= but in fact, the universe is full of neutrinos. Every cubic centimeter of th= e universe has about 200 or so neutrinos, which are left over from the Big B= ang.''=20 The finding may also fill in the blanks in equations aimed at solving how pa= rticles acquire mass, ``one of the deepest unsolved questions of particle ph= ysics,'' Casper said. ``This will help astronomers understand something that= puzzles them greatly _ why is there more gravitational force than they expe= ct from the amount of stuff the can see out there,'' Casper added. Learned s= ays neutrinos, until now thought to have no mass, may on the whole turn out=20= to make up ``most of the mass of the universe. ''=20 The discovery was made at Super-Kamiokande Observatory, the world's largest=20= elementary particle detector, northwest of Tokyo. Scientists from 23 institu= tions in the United States, Japan, Poland and Korea took part. The team incl= uded Dr. Henry Sobel, also of UC-Irvine.=20 Neutrinos, similar to electrons, have long been known to be a fundamental co= nstituent of nature. But unlike electrons, neutrinos carry no electric charg= e, and thus can pass unimpeded through great distances in matter. This prope= rty, along with their invisibility, has made them extremely difficult to obs= erve. Scientists have suspected for years that neutrinos might have a very s= mall, but non-zero, mass, but never before could prove it.=20 Casper said the discovery won't ``change the life of the average Joe'' but h= as profound implications for physicists and astrophysicsts. The finding also= suggests, he said, that the gravitational influence of neutrinos may have b= een a catalyst for the collapse of the diffuse primordial gas into more dens= e regions that eventually spawned galaxies, stars and planets.=20 UC-Irvine issued a statement on behalf of its scientists asserting that the=20= experiment had yielded ``results that are outside the standard theory of par= ticle physics, which describes the fundamental constituents of matter and th= eir interactions. Until now, there has been no firm evidence that neutrinos=20= possess mass.'' The evidence was based upon studies of neutrinos created whe= n cosmic rays bombard the Earth's upper atmosphere, producing storms of secn= dary particles that rain down constantly from the heavens. Most neutrinos pa= ss through the entire planet unscathed, but have been detected passing throu= gh the Super-Kamiokande group's 50,000-ton tank of purified water 1,000 mete= rs beneath the surface.=20 The scientists noticed the neutrinos oscillated, or changed from one type of= neutrino to another, something that could occur only if they have mass. The= y say in a joint statement that neutrinos ``must now be incorporated into th= e theoretical models of the structure of matter and that astrophysicists con= cerned with finding the 'missing' or 'dark matter' in the universe must now=20= consider the neutrino as a serious candidate.''=20 Neutrinos were created in vast quantities in the first instants after the Bi= g Bang and permeate the universe, Casper said.=20 ``Because these leftover neutrinos are everywhere, even if they have a tiny=20= mass, when you add them up, it adds up to something significant in terms of=20= how galaxies and large scale structures in the universe gravitationally inte= ract,'' Casper said. ``You have a zillion things which by themselves have al= most no mass, but when you add them all up, they can have a large scale. Thi= s may now guide theorists in answering the big question _ why does everythin= g have mass?''=20 Learned said, ``this is fundamental science on the most basic scale,'' and i= ts practical applications might not become evident for many years.=20 Copyright 1998 by United Press International All rights reserved=20 ------=_NextPart_000_0017_01C0EB4E.6906BE80 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding:quoted-printable
Hi Tom I believe some form of these neut= rinos=20 are the gravity particles. Bruce

 

Candidate for universal gravitational glue

UPI Sci= ence=20 News Thursday June 4 9:34 PM EDT=20

TAKAYAMA, Japan, June 5 (UPI) - Researchers say they have identifed what=20= may=20 be the unseen gravitational glue _ the so-called dark matter responsible in=20= part=20 for the evolution of the universe from the moment of its birth: neutrinos.=20

A serious candidate for this glue, neutrinos are invisible, sub- atomic=20 particles, created at the time of the Big Bang, that stream through the Eart= h,=20 people and everything else unfettered.=20

The groundbreaking discovery, announced Friday in Japan by an internation= al=20 team of scientists, was that neutrinos have mass. Because the particles fill= the=20 universe, scientists say, collectively they may have the force to reverse it= s=20 expansive course to cause the ``Big Crunch.''=20

So fundamental a discovery, they said at Neutrino '98, an international=20 physics conference in Takayama, Japan, could help explain baffling puzzles a= bout=20 the nature of matter and the formation of the universe after the Big Bang.=20

The discovery was the result of a two year, $100 million experiment by an= =20 international team of scientists.=20

Dr. John G. Learned, a University of Hawaii physicist and one of the lead= =20 researchers, told United Press International, the discovery means neutrinos=20= may=20 account for the many gravitational forces apparent in astronomical observati= ons=20 that no one has ever been able to explain.=20

``This will go down as perhaps the one most important discovery in scienc= e in=20 the decade,'' he said Thursday. ``It means that neutrinos are surely one of=20= the=20 more massive components of the universe.''=20

Dr. David Casper, a University of California-Irvine physicist and another= =20 team member, agreed, asserting the finding will help scientists understand `= `how=20 galaxies and other large scale structures in the universe interact=20 gravitationally.''=20

Until now, he said, scientists have been puzzled about the movements of t= he=20 heavens, knowing that something was missing from their calculations, and=20 describing the unknown variable as ``dark'' or ``missing'' matter. This=20 discovery, Learned said, suggests that neutrinos have an aggregate gravitati= onal=20 influence that may eventually be sufficient to reverse the universal expansi= on=20 triggered by the Big Bang and cause a ``Big Crunch.'' ``The discovery of=20 neutrino mass is intimately connected with both the origins and ultimate fat= e of=20 the universe,'' Casper said. ``We suspected but did not know that neutrinos=20= had=20 tiny mass. We didn't think of them as making up a part of our world, but in=20 fact, the universe is full of neutrinos. Every cubic centimeter of the unive= rse=20 has about 200 or so neutrinos, which are left over from the Big Bang.''=20

The finding may also fill in the blanks in equations aimed at solving how= =20 particles acquire mass, ``one of the deepest unsolved questions of particle=20 physics,'' Casper said. ``This will help astronomers understand something th= at=20 puzzles them greatly _ why is there more gravitational force than they expec= t=20 from the amount of stuff the can see out there,'' Casper added. Learned says= =20 neutrinos, until now thought to have no mass, may on the whole turn out to m= ake=20 up ``most of the mass of the universe. ''=20

The discovery was made at Super-Kamiokande Observatory, the world's large= st=20 elementary particle detector, northwest of Tokyo. Scientists from 23=20 institutions in the United States, Japan, Poland and Korea took part. The te= am=20 included Dr. Henry Sobel, also of UC-Irvine.=20

Neutrinos, similar to electrons, have long been known to be a fundamental= =20 constituent of nature. But unlike electrons, neutrinos carry no electric cha= rge,=20 and thus can pass unimpeded through great distances in matter. This property= ,=20 along with their invisibility, has made them extremely difficult to observe.= =20 Scientists have suspected for years that neutrinos might have a very small,=20= but=20 non-zero, mass, but never before could prove it.=20

Casper said the discovery won't ``change the life of the average Joe'' bu= t=20 has profound implications for physicists and astrophysicsts. The finding als= o=20 suggests, he said, that the gravitational influence of neutrinos may have be= en a=20 catalyst for the collapse of the diffuse primordial gas into more dense regi= ons=20 that eventually spawned galaxies, stars and planets.=20

UC-Irvine issued a statement on behalf of its scientists asserting that t= he=20 experiment had yielded ``results that are outside the standard theory of=20 particle physics, which describes the fundamental constituents of matter and= =20 their interactions. Until now, there has been no firm evidence that neutrino= s=20 possess mass.'' The evidence was based upon studies of neutrinos created whe= n=20 cosmic rays bombard the Earth's upper atmosphere, producing storms of secnda= ry=20 particles that rain down constantly from the heavens. Most neutrinos pass=20 through the entire planet unscathed, but have been detected passing through=20= the=20 Super-Kamiokande group's 50,000-ton tank of purified water 1,000 meters bene= ath=20 the surface.=20

The scientists noticed the neutrinos oscillated, or changed from one type= of=20 neutrino to another, something that could occur only if they have mass. They= say=20 in a joint statement that neutrinos ``must now be incorporated into the=20 theoretical models of the structure of matter and that astrophysicists conce= rned=20 with finding the 'missing' or 'dark matter' in the universe must now conside= r=20 the neutrino as a serious candidate.''=20

Neutrinos were created in vast quantities in the first instants after the= Big=20 Bang and permeate the universe, Casper said.=20

``Because these leftover neutrinos are everywhere, even if they have a ti= ny=20 mass, when you add them up, it adds up to something significant in terms of=20= how=20 galaxies and large scale structures in the universe gravitationally interact= ,''=20 Casper said. ``You have a zillion things which by themselves have almost no=20 mass, but when you add them all up, they can have a large scale. This may no= w=20 guide theorists in answering the big question _ why does everything have mas= s?''=20

Learned said, ``this is fundamental science on the most basic scale,'' an= d=20 its practical applications might not become evident for many years.=20

Copyright 1998 by United Press International All rights reserved=20

------=_NextPart_000_0017_01C0EB4E.6906BE80-- --part1_65.1547c792.284aff04_boundary-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Jun 2 22:50:26 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id WAA06804; Sat, 2 Jun 2001 22:48:57 -0700 Resent-Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2001 22:48:57 -0700 From: Robin van Spaandonk To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Fwd: Candidate for universal gravitational glue Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2001 15:48:46 +1000 Organization: Improving Message-ID: References: <65.1547c792.284aff04 aol.com> In-Reply-To: <65.1547c792.284aff04 aol.com> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id WAA06773 Resent-Message-ID: <"omkto1.0.Eg1.8_S6x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/42951 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: In reply to ConexTom aol.com's message of Sat, 2 Jun 2001 22:46:28 EDT: >Subj: Fw: Candidate for universal gravitational glue >Date: 6/2/01 11:41:42 AM Pacific Daylight Time >From:    etimes teleport.com (Bruce Meland) >To:    tom rhfweb.com >CC:    conextom aol.com > >Hi Tom I believe some form of these neutrinos are the gravity particles. Bruce > > >Candidate for universal gravitational glue There is no glue, and none needed. The reason astronomers/astro-physicists think they need one, is because they ignore the magnetic fields of stars and galaxies. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk A Future For Humanity see: http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ New model hydrogen atom see http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/New-hydrogen.html From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Jun 3 09:27:12 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id JAA01265; Sun, 3 Jun 2001 09:26:12 -0700 Resent-Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2001 09:26:12 -0700 From: Standing Bear To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Egad! No More Martians? Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2001 12:30:26 -0700 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.1.99] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" References: <000901c0eabc$31c35510$1f962640 bear> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01060312302600.01501 linux> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id JAA01238 Resent-Message-ID: <"HTgZS3.0.cJ.aKc6x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/42952 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: On Friday 01 June 2001 12:23, Rick Monteverde wrote: > Matthew - > > >Humans have the ability to impose familiar patterns on objects that have > >none. Clouds, Stars, dirt, stains on fabric, and Chemical formations. It is > >a natural part of our brain doing its job > > Its bilateral symmetry is very good and highly unusual, and still > tends indicate the possibility of artificiality. I see no change in > that between the early photos (properly analyzed and geometrically > corrected) and these latest. > > But those 'glass tubes' are so obviously sand dunes in a channel, > your argument above is ... too gentle? Anyone's brain says it's > 'doing it's job' should be fired on the spot and removed from the > premesis in the company of security guards if it tells them they're > looking at a glass covered conduit of some sort. > > Of course RH figured out Europa's ocean as a possible life habitat, > and the 19.5 degree hotspot deal too. Have you ever seen such genius > mixed with such blank-eyed stupidity? Maybe Newton the astrologer? > > - Rick Monteverde > Honolulu, HI Rick, How about the Chinese philosopher who stated that a way to attack a philosophy was to vilify the messsenger. It is effective. Look at our American politics for the last generation. You guys from Hawaii know about it too. I've been to the Islands. I have also heard that in some places people will listen to you for exactly 20 milliseconds and then call you 'haole' before attacking you, Spanish surname or not. Blind prejudice, a related anti logical quirk of the human species, tends to work that same way. I lived through the sixties. People listened to what they wanted to hear, just like monopolistic capitalist executives. The only thing that mattered was what they wanted or valued. They would trash other people's theories as vandalistic burglars on a midnight requisition expedition would their victims' apartments. I really do not know whether those glass tubes exist or not. I have seen old pictures purporting to be water pipes on the moon allegedly taken from an early lunar orbiter with cameras now known to have a resolution of about a quarter mile......so much grist for the truly gullible, which this writer is not. Skepticism is fine, but how about true and fair evaluation of each side without resorting to rhetorical tricks known to first year debating students and old Chinese. Hopefully that will not give you a headache. You know, those surfboards must hurt when you wipe out on a big wave and the old board just then has the perverse intelligence to come behing you and nail you right behind the ear. Ouch!.....remember that last time? Looking at the beach.....there was this swimsuit competition all lined up. .........so many, and so little time............looked a little tooo ..........oh..............oh-OH..................sonofab___ that hurt. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Jun 3 09:50:02 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id JAA07165; Sun, 3 Jun 2001 09:47:05 -0700 Resent-Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2001 09:47:05 -0700 From: Standing Bear To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Fwd: Candidate for universal gravitational glue Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2001 12:51:16 -0700 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.1.99] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" References: <65.1547c792.284aff04 aol.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01060312511601.01501 linux> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id JAA07143 Resent-Message-ID: <"_8PVO2.0.pl1.8ec6x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/42953 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: On Saturday 02 June 2001 22:48, Robin van Spaandonk wrote: > In reply to ConexTom aol.com's message of Sat, 2 Jun 2001 22:46:28 EDT: > > >Subj: Fw: Candidate for universal gravitational glue > >Date: 6/2/01 11:41:42 AM Pacific Daylight Time > >From:    etimes teleport.com (Bruce Meland) > >To:    tom rhfweb.com > >CC:    conextom aol.com > > > >Hi Tom I believe some form of these neutrinos are the gravity particles. Bruce > > > > > >Candidate for universal gravitational glue > There is no glue, and none needed. The reason > astronomers/astro-physicists think they need one, is because they ignore > the magnetic fields of stars and galaxies. > > > Regards, > > Robin van Spaandonk > > A Future For Humanity see: http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ > New model hydrogen atom see http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/New-hydrogen.html Nobody really knows. What we really need is more data. The only way we are going to begin to get that is to go out into space and look for it. Ourselves! On manned expeditions. We the human race are going to have to cooperate long enough to to it together. We can argue endlessly and accomplish not really as much as we think. We need to go there! Even if it is just to cruise around the solar system. Plenty to see and do right here in our own system. We build a ship, a system ship, looking a little like the Star Trek Enterprise but with four nacelles instead of two. The saucer can be made to revolve, creating artificial gravity for the crew while not on watch (duty). The nacelles can house very large ionic drives like the Deep Space 1. Make them so that they can thrust both forward and backward on command. Power it with a strong nuclear reactor. Equip it with a large sail to catch interplanetary gases like hydrogen for use as propellant. If strong enough, it would be able to use system bodies with hydrogen atmospheres as 'gas stations'. Make it large enough for a crew of 250 to 400 to live indefinitely on it. Utilize that cold fusion if possible. The only energy criterion is that it be usable beyond the orbit of Neptune as a viable source of life support energy and propulsion energy. This is really within our present technology. It could never land on a planet, but could carry craft that could. It could be used to prospect asteroids for minerals and outer atmospheres for gases useful on earth. It would have to be compartmented to contain damage from possible hull punctures, and have redundant systems and personnel for critical needs and skills. It would fire the imagination of generations of people in the world and bring them the light of hope Standing Bear From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Jun 3 14:39:37 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id OAA16861; Sun, 3 Jun 2001 14:38:56 -0700 Resent-Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2001 14:38:56 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: rick mail.highsurf.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <01060312302600.01501 linux> References: <000901c0eabc$31c35510$1f962640 bear> <01060312302600.01501@linux> Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2001 11:37:08 -1000 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Rick Monteverde Subject: Re: Egad! No More Martians? Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Resent-Message-ID: <"lMwJP1.0.B74.lvg6x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/42954 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Standing B. - >Hopefully that will not give you a headache. You >know, those surfboards must hurt when you wipe out on >a big wave and the old board just then has the perverse >intelligence to come behing you and nail you right behind >the ear. Dude, I only bodysurf on big waves. No (fiber)glass needed when I fly through the big shiny transport tubes on *this* planet, dig? - Rick Monteverde Honolulu, HI From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Jun 3 15:38:37 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id PAA02001; Sun, 3 Jun 2001 15:36:19 -0700 Resent-Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2001 15:36:19 -0700 From: Robin van Spaandonk To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Fwd: Candidate for universal gravitational glue Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2001 08:36:03 +1000 Organization: Improving Message-ID: <2qelhtskgr9ibhg157uqe7d9b5rfclsgrn 4ax.com> References: <65.1547c792.284aff04 aol.com> <01060312511601.01501@linux> In-Reply-To: <01060312511601.01501 linux> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id PAA01955 Resent-Message-ID: <"eRobd3.0.7V.Ylh6x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/42955 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: In reply to Standing Bear's message of Sun, 3 Jun 2001 12:51:16 -0700: [snip] > It would fire the imagination of generations of people >in the world and bring them the light of hope [snip] 20 years ago, you would have been right. All that is needed now however is for the "black" projects to come out of the closet, and reveal that we already regularly make trips throughout the solar system, and have bases on both the moon and Mars. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk A Future For Humanity see: http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ New model hydrogen atom see http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/New-hydrogen.html From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Jun 3 16:06:11 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id QAA09843; Sun, 3 Jun 2001 16:04:28 -0700 Resent-Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2001 16:04:28 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Sender: mjones pop.jump.net Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: <65.1547c792.284aff04 aol.com> <65.1547c792.284aff04@aol.com> Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2001 15:09:00 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Mitchell Jones Subject: Re: Fwd: Candidate for universal gravitational glue Resent-Message-ID: <"5lqfG1.0.jP2.x9i6x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/42956 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: >In reply to ConexTom aol.com's message of Sat, 2 Jun 2001 22:46:28 EDT: > >>Subj: Fw: Candidate for universal gravitational glue >>Date: 6/2/01 11:41:42 AM Pacific Daylight Time >>From: etimes teleport.com (Bruce Meland) >>To: tom rhfweb.com >>CC: conextom aol.com >> >>Hi Tom I believe some form of these neutrinos are the gravity particles. >>Bruce >> >> >>Candidate for universal gravitational glue >There is no glue, and none needed. The reason >astronomers/astro-physicists think they need one, is because they ignore >the magnetic fields of stars and galaxies. ***{So the missing mass is the mass of stellar magnetic fields? OK, let's see some numbers: what is the mass of the sun's magnetic field, for example? (And please remember: we are yahoos out here, so we need to see each step in the calculation. :-) --MJ}*** >Regards, > >Robin van Spaandonk > >A Future For Humanity see: http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ >New model hydrogen atom see >http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/New-hydrogen.html ________________ Quote of the month: "Always strive to be accurate, even when it doesn't matter, so that you can be accurate when it does matter." --Jude Acers From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Jun 3 17:47:41 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id RAA07764; Sun, 3 Jun 2001 17:45:43 -0700 Resent-Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2001 17:45:43 -0700 Message-ID: <01c901c0ec86$f84024e0$c995fc9e computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: Cc: Subject: Re: Barn roof free energy Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2001 18:35:54 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Resent-Message-ID: <"7Y2I13.0.Cv1.sej6x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/42957 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: The Fair Weather Field strength, E in Volts/Meter versus altitude, h (kilometers) is approximated by: E = 90*e^-3.5h + 40*e^-.22h (volts/meter) This gives about 130 volts/meter at sea level and about 1.5 volts/meter at 15 km (49,200 ft, which is the maximum altitude for a thundercloud). Somewhere above this the ionosphere reaches a positive potential wrt the earth's surface. By no small coincidence the small ion (O2- & H2O-) concentration is about 500/cm^3 at sea level and 5,000/cm^3 at 15 km. Now, to see whether an ion will fall toward the earth due to the gravitational force, Fg or fall up due the field force, Fes = q*E (newtons): Fg = 9.8 * mass = 1.6E-19Coulombs* 1.5 v/m mass to float = 1.6E-19*1.5/9.8 Thus a water drop must have a mass of 1.6E-19*1.5/9.8 = 2.45E-20 kg, meaning it has to have more than 820,000 H2O molecules in it in order for it to fall and gain momentum to overcome the higher field gradient so it can rain on Frank's Little Red Barn roof. With gutters and a water wheel, the hydropower potential is much greater than trying to harness the ~ 400 Megawatts from the Earth-Ionosphere Electrical System that Tesla (and Bruce's "Mr. X") dreamed about. :-) Even if you could harness it, and get the 400 Megwatts it would be a drop in the bucket compared to a 4,000 Megawatt Nuclear facility. Regards, Frederick From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Jun 3 19:01:56 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id SAA01048; Sun, 3 Jun 2001 18:57:40 -0700 Resent-Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2001 18:57:40 -0700 From: Robin van Spaandonk To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Fwd: Candidate for universal gravitational glue Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2001 11:57:02 +1000 Organization: Improving Message-ID: <6cqlhtgqf206395muma5pi17a9cbik8b28 4ax.com> References: <65.1547c792.284aff04 aol.com> <65.1547c792.284aff04@aol.com> In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id SAA01018 Resent-Message-ID: <"kGicN3.0.EG.Jik6x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/42958 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: In reply to Mitchell Jones's message of Sun, 3 Jun 2001 15:09:00 -0500: [snip] >***{So the missing mass is the mass of stellar magnetic fields? OK, let's >see some numbers: what is the mass of the sun's magnetic field, for >example? (And please remember: we are yahoos out here, so we need to see >each step in the calculation. :-) --MJ}*** [snip] No, the "missing mass" isn't the mass of the magnetic fields. The premise that mass is missing is based on the false assumption that the only force holding galaxies together is the gravitational force. No account is taken of the magnetic attraction between stellar magnetic fields and the galactic magnetic field. BTW I just shot myself in the foot. Since the sun's field reverses every 11 years, it should result in the sun being alternately attracted and repelled by the galactic field, which in turn would result in an erratic course for the sun, which AFAIK is not in evidence. :(. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk A Future For Humanity see: http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ New model hydrogen atom see http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/New-hydrogen.html From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Jun 3 21:56:25 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id VAA22767; Sun, 3 Jun 2001 21:52:24 -0700 Resent-Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2001 21:52:24 -0700 Message-ID: <002601c0ecb1$f9677f50$62584118 CRQ> From: "Colin Quinney" To: Cc: References: <65.1547c792.284aff04 aol.com> <65.1547c792.284aff04@aol.com> <6cqlhtgqf206395muma5pi17a9cbik8b28@4ax.com> Subject: Re: Fwd: Candidate for universal gravitational glue Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 00:51:10 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Resent-Message-ID: <"2tdqT.0.eZ5.7Gn6x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/42959 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Hi Robin, I know I'm going even further out on a "limb" here , but.. What if the anomalous stellar angular rim velocity results not from missing mass or stellar/galactic magnetic attractions but from electrodynamic interactions? Ion currents arising from total galactic sun's coronal mass discharge/wind and light pressures on plasma ions; these will be strongest radially since those suns are most numerous. This should have the additive effect of creating a radial current. A galactic electrodynamic homopolar motor action should then result with more "motor action" naturally occurring where the magnetic fields are also the most concentrated. And where is that? In a natural or permanent magnet the magnetic field is most concentrated at the rim, but in a galaxy, where is the magnetic field strongest? Could "missing mass" be simply missing electrodynamics? Best Regards, Colin Quinney ----- Original Message ----- From: "Robin van Spaandonk" To: Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2001 9:57 PM Subject: Re: Fwd: Candidate for universal gravitational glue ... > No, the "missing mass" isn't the mass of the magnetic fields. The > premise that mass is missing is based on the false assumption that the > only force holding galaxies together is the gravitational force. > No account is taken of the magnetic attraction between stellar magnetic > fields and the galactic magnetic field. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Jun 3 22:05:12 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id WAA24849; Sun, 3 Jun 2001 22:00:31 -0700 Resent-Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2001 22:00:31 -0700 Message-ID: <01e701c0ecaa$8fd573a0$c995fc9e computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: Cc: Subject: Re: Atmospheric Electrons & Static Electricity Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2001 22:56:29 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Resent-Message-ID: <"G2fds.0.546.kNn6x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/42960 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Try this for thought: Light Leptons aside. It looks like the Earth-Ionosphere electrical system is providing the "free electrons" for the "Static Electricity" effects. IOW, the Electron Affinity of various molecules near the Earth's surface (ground) that ranges from a fraction of an eV and up, but much less than the Ionization Potential of most materials, is allowing these sequestered electrons to be easily removed. Never could figure why most plastics with a high dielectric strength and ionization potential, so readily give up their electrons by rubbing, or how a simple Van de Graaff generator can allow rubbing a glass rod with a latex belt build up high potentials just by transporting electrons from ground to a metal sphere. And then there was Amber and Jet rubbed by fur that the ancients used for getting a jolt. IOW, thanks to this Solar-Powered System, when it rains, it rains electrons too. :-) Regards, Frederick From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Jun 3 23:18:19 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id XAA09526; Sun, 3 Jun 2001 23:16:58 -0700 Resent-Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2001 23:16:58 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <000a01c0eb4a$6b60ff00$e1a8a3ac default> References: <000a01c0eb4a$6b60ff00$e1a8a3ac default> Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 01:17:08 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: thomas malloy Subject: Re: Plans for Gravition Power Plants In The Near Future-My Proof! Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Resent-Message-ID: <"XVliw.0.gK2.NVo6x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/42961 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: > " > >I have about a half dozen books on pyramid power, zero point energies, >and gravity physics which I am reading presently, and I may be able to >piece together the facts and the technological process. I may also be able >to Have you read Puthoff's latest paper speculating on the nature of gravity and inertia? >hire researchers to prove the facts in the near future and then file >patents and >encourage legislation in the U.S. or in other more friendly countries. Have you heard about an International Patent? I've been told that they offer good protection and they will protect property that the U S PTO won't. > >Logically to produce gravity waves if they exist, all one needs to do is >generate >waves smaller than light waves. And to test for gravity waves all one needs >to You can speculate and remote view all you want to but you are going to have to come up with a detector which measures changes based on physical changes. >do is to be able to measure waves smaller than light waves. Does anyone know of detectors which measure frequencies in the higher end of the spectrum? > >Respectively, > >President, Thomas Clark From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Jun 3 23:19:01 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx2.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id XAA16480; Sun, 3 Jun 2001 23:17:10 -0700 (PDT) Resent-Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2001 23:17:10 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 01:17:08 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: thomas malloy Subject: fusion reactor Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Resent-Message-ID: <"n6Cnj2.0.Q14.aVo6x" mx2> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/42962 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: The author of this website claims to have built an improved hot fusion reactor. http://hometown.aol.com/hypercom59/index.html From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Jun 3 23:19:06 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx2.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id XAA16530; Sun, 3 Jun 2001 23:17:19 -0700 (PDT) Resent-Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2001 23:17:19 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <014801c0eb9a$e40fb720$c995fc9e computer> References: <000101c0eb8f$1838cc00$4c181ad8 oemcomputer> <014801c0eb9a$e40fb720$c995fc9e computer> Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 01:17:08 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: thomas malloy Subject: Re: Barn roof free energy Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Resent-Message-ID: <"lNYz81.0.C24.jVo6x" mx2> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/42963 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Bruce Meland" >To: >Cc: ; ; >Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2001 12:47 PM >Subject: Re: Barn roof free energy > >Bruce, > >I think you would've been better off to have spent that $37.00 plus S & H on a >"Shrink". :-) > >Regards, Frederick I agree, I linked to Dr. Lindermann's site from Jerry Decker's site. I asked him some pointed questions. I have yet to receive a reply. Bottom line, anybody can write a book, but it takes a break through to heat water. > > >> I think you serious tinkerers would save a lot of time and money if you >> purchased the recent published book "The Free Energy Secrets of Cold > > Electricity by Dr. Peter Lindemann for about $37, includes shipping and From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 4 00:15:08 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id AAA20712; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 00:12:04 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 00:12:04 -0700 From: Robin van Spaandonk To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: fusion reactor Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2001 17:11:27 +1000 Organization: Improving Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id AAA20682 Resent-Message-ID: <"epLWa2.0.T35.2Jp6x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/42964 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: In reply to thomas malloy's message of Mon, 4 Jun 2001 01:17:08 -0500: > >The author of this website claims to have built an improved hot fusion reactor. >http://hometown.aol.com/hypercom59/index.html Yes, but he isn't sure yet whether or not he has actually seen fusion. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk A Future For Humanity see: http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ New model hydrogen atom see http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/New-hydrogen.html From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 4 00:17:22 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id AAA21721; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 00:16:34 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 00:16:34 -0700 From: Robin van Spaandonk To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Fwd: Candidate for universal gravitational glue Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2001 17:15:54 +1000 Organization: Improving Message-ID: <85dmht4kl674fskop67atkpshijp1mj5js 4ax.com> References: <65.1547c792.284aff04 aol.com> <65.1547c792.284aff04@aol.com> <6cqlhtgqf206395muma5pi17a9cbik8b28@4ax.com> <002601c0ecb1$f9677f50$62584118@CRQ> In-Reply-To: <002601c0ecb1$f9677f50$62584118 CRQ> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id AAA21628 Resent-Message-ID: <"bkdMb2.0.9J5.ENp6x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/42965 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: In reply to Colin Quinney's message of Mon, 4 Jun 2001 00:51:10 -0400: >Hi Robin, > >I know I'm going even further out on a "limb" here , but.. Actually, I think may be on a stronger limb than I was :). > >What if the anomalous stellar angular rim velocity results not from missing >mass or stellar/galactic magnetic attractions but from electrodynamic >interactions? This is what I was trying to say, in a simplified fashion. Perhaps however it can't be simplified without losing it's essence. See "The Big Bang Never Happened" by Eric J. Lerner. [snip] Regards, Robin van Spaandonk A Future For Humanity see: http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ New model hydrogen atom see http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/New-hydrogen.html From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 4 07:00:44 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id GAA28558; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 06:59:38 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 06:59:38 -0700 Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2001 06:58:04 -0700 From: Jones Beene Subject: Re: fusion reactor To: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-to: jonesb9 pacbell.net Message-id: <0GEE00FDKS6ZSA mta5.snfc21.pbi.net> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Opera 5.11 build 904 Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Resent-Message-ID: <"pP31G.0.8-6.9Hv6x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/42966 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Robin van Spaandonk wrote in reply to Thomas Malloy's message of Mon, 4 Jun 2001: >>The author of this website claims to have built an improved hot fusion reactor. http://hometown.aol.com/hypercom59/index.html >Yes, but he isn't sure yet whether or not he has actually seen fusion. Guys, he has a Farnsworth Fusor type device. These have been around for decades. It does produce D+D fusion, but on a very small scale - at the "tail" of the probability curve. There are a half dozen or more other sites on the web that demonstrate these devices (with more clarity and sophistication). In fact, Scott Little, who used to contribute to this forum, build one rather quickly that produced more neutrons than the one in question. Richard Hull has built several and has gotten over 10^5 neutrons/sec, I believe. G. Miley of CF fame even patented a similar device and sold it to Daimler- Chrysler Aerospace - they already have a commercial product on the market - a simple laboratory neutron generator that gives something like 10^6 neutrons/sec. Do a web search for Farnsworth Fusor for more info - this is very interesting stuff, but far from new. All of these are massively inefficient - hundreds of thousands of times removed from thermodynamic breakeven. You would need about 10^12 neutrons/ sec to make the thing even interesting as some kind of subcritical fission add-on. Regards, Jones Beene From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 4 07:35:17 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id HAA09167; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 07:33:50 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 07:33:50 -0700 From: Standing Bear To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Plans for Gravition Power Plants In The Near Future-My Proof! Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 10:38:02 -0700 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.1.99] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" References: <000a01c0eb4a$6b60ff00$e1a8a3ac default> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01060410380200.00884 linux> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id HAA09102 Resent-Message-ID: <"RWzUo3.0.5F2.Env6x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/42967 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: On Sunday 03 June 2001 23:17, thomas malloy wrote: > > " > > > >I have about a half dozen books on pyramid power, zero point energies, > >and gravity physics which I am reading presently, and I may be able to > >piece together the facts and the technological process. I may also be able > >to > > Have you read Puthoff's latest paper speculating on the nature of > gravity and inertia? > > > >hire researchers to prove the facts in the near future and then file > >patents and > >encourage legislation in the U.S. or in other more friendly countries. > > Have you heard about an International Patent? I've been told that > they offer good protection and they will protect property that the U > S PTO won't. > > > > >Logically to produce gravity waves if they exist, all one needs to do is > >generate > >waves smaller than light waves. And to test for gravity waves all one needs > >to > > You can speculate and remote view all you want to but you are going > to have to come up with a detector which measures changes based on > physical changes. > > >do is to be able to measure waves smaller than light waves. > > Does anyone know of detectors which measure frequencies in the higher > end of the spectrum? > > > > >Respectively, > > > >President, Thomas Clark Gentlemen, To measure these physical changes, we would need a 'measuring stick' that did not change while the rest of the physical world changed, a reference wave or object. It would have to operate much like a gyrocompass on a ship. As anyone who has ever been to sea knows, compasses cannot always be reliably read due to motion of the ship relative to the compass pointer. So gyrocompasses are used that resist those relative translations and rotations. They are built of varying accuracies when one needs finer readouts in rougher situations. Suggestions anyone!? From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 4 07:39:17 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id HAA10906; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 07:36:52 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 07:36:52 -0700 From: Standing Bear To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: fusion reactor Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 10:40:59 -0700 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.1.99] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01060410405901.00884 linux> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id HAA10787 Resent-Message-ID: <"nwGBd.0.Wf2._pv6x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/42968 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: On Sunday 03 June 2001 23:17, thomas malloy wrote: > The author of this website claims to have built an improved hot fusion reactor. > http://hometown.aol.com/hypercom59/index.html What is your effective power out? That is the power left over to be used after deducting the input power? The device would have to produce more power than it consumes in order to be really useful outside a laboratory. Standing Bear From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 4 11:11:11 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id LAA05314; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 11:05:10 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 11:05:10 -0700 From: "Matthew Rogers" To: Subject: RE: Fwd: Candidate for universal gravitational glue Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 11:04:36 -0700 Message-ID: <000901c0ed20$d1b8cee0$a2962640 bear> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <01060312511601.01501 linux> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Importance: Normal Resent-Message-ID: <"cJ1fG1.0.sI1.Kty6x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/42970 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Bravo Bear!! I like your attitude. Explorers Unite! Matthew Rogers Prove it.. -----Original Message----- From: Standing Bear [mailto:rockcast net-link.net] Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2001 12:51 PM To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Fwd: Candidate for universal gravitational glue On Saturday 02 June 2001 22:48, Robin van Spaandonk wrote: > In reply to ConexTom aol.com's message of Sat, 2 Jun 2001 22:46:28 EDT: > > >Subj: Fw: Candidate for universal gravitational glue > >Date: 6/2/01 11:41:42 AM Pacific Daylight Time > >From: etimes teleport.com (Bruce Meland) > >To: tom rhfweb.com > >CC: conextom aol.com > > > >Hi Tom I believe some form of these neutrinos are the gravity particles. Bruce > > > > > >Candidate for universal gravitational glue > There is no glue, and none needed. The reason > astronomers/astro-physicists think they need one, is because they ignore > the magnetic fields of stars and galaxies. > > > Regards, > > Robin van Spaandonk > > A Future For Humanity see: http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ > New model hydrogen atom see http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/New-hydrogen.html Nobody really knows. What we really need is more data. The only way we are going to begin to get that is to go out into space and look for it. Ourselves! On manned expeditions. We the human race are going to have to cooperate long enough to to it together. We can argue endlessly and accomplish not really as much as we think. We need to go there! Even if it is just to cruise around the solar system. Plenty to see and do right here in our own system. We build a ship, a system ship, looking a little like the Star Trek Enterprise but with four nacelles instead of two. The saucer can be made to revolve, creating artificial gravity for the crew while not on watch (duty). The nacelles can house very large ionic drives like the Deep Space 1. Make them so that they can thrust both forward and backward on command. Power it with a strong nuclear reactor. Equip it with a large sail to catch interplanetary gases like hydrogen for use as propellant. If strong enough, it would be able to use system bodies with hydrogen atmospheres as 'gas stations'. Make it large enough for a crew of 250 to 400 to live indefinitely on it. Utilize that cold fusion if possible. The only energy criterion is that it be usable beyond the orbit of Neptune as a viable source of life support energy and propulsion energy. This is really within our present technology. It could never land on a planet, but could carry craft that could. It could be used to prospect asteroids for minerals and outer atmospheres for gases useful on earth. It would have to be compartmented to contain damage from possible hull punctures, and have redundant systems and personnel for critical needs and skills. It would fire the imagination of generations of people in the world and bring them the light of hope Standing Bear From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 4 11:16:41 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id LAA08826; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 11:13:46 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 11:13:46 -0700 Message-ID: <000301c0ed17$77a051c0$ef181ad8 oemcomputer> From: "Bruce Meland" To: Cc: "Mitchell Jones" , Subject: Re: Fwd: Candidate for universal gravitational glue Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 09:38:47 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Resent-Message-ID: <"8YVJ21.0.792.K_y6x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/42971 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: After observing the energy generated from nutrino type particles, and perhaps magnetic fields of earth and stars if they are present here on earth in sufficient quanity(stars magnetic fields overlapping the earth), light particles from the sun seem insignificant. Other cosmic rays, such as mesons may also be involved. Bruce -----Original Message----- From: Mitchell Jones To: vortex-l eskimo.com Date: Sunday, June 03, 2001 4:06 PM Subject: Re: Fwd: Candidate for universal gravitational glue >>In reply to ConexTom aol.com's message of Sat, 2 Jun 2001 22:46:28 EDT: >> >>>Subj: Fw: Candidate for universal gravitational glue >>>Date: 6/2/01 11:41:42 AM Pacific Daylight Time >>>From: etimes teleport.com (Bruce Meland) >>>To: tom rhfweb.com >>>CC: conextom aol.com >>> >>>Hi Tom I believe some form of these neutrinos are the gravity particles. >>>Bruce >>> >>> >>>Candidate for universal gravitational glue >>There is no glue, and none needed. The reason >>astronomers/astro-physicists think they need one, is because they ignore >>the magnetic fields of stars and galaxies. > >***{So the missing mass is the mass of stellar magnetic fields? OK, let's >see some numbers: what is the mass of the sun's magnetic field, for >example? (And please remember: we are yahoos out here, so we need to see >each step in the calculation. :-) --MJ}*** > >>Regards, >> >>Robin van Spaandonk >> >>A Future For Humanity see: http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ >>New model hydrogen atom see >>http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/New-hydrogen.html > >________________ >Quote of the month: > >"Always strive to be accurate, even when it doesn't matter, so that you can >be accurate when it does matter." --Jude Acers > > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 4 11:17:23 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id LAA08908; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 11:13:56 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 11:13:56 -0700 Message-ID: <000501c0ed17$79c10ee0$ef181ad8 oemcomputer> From: "Bruce Meland" To: Subject: Re: Candidate for universal gravitational glue Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 09:51:03 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0092_01C0ECDB.DE122D20" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Resent-Message-ID: <"czwCI3.0.SA2.S_y6x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/42972 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0092_01C0ECDB.DE122D20 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable HI again Dr Clark; Did the other email about neutrinos from ABC News = with photos of detectors get through to you from me. I lost some of your = emails to me after i sent this to you. What part of the US are you = located? Bruce Meland, editor Electrifying Times -----Original Message----- From: ConexTom aol.com To: vortex-l eskimo.com ; DEACH@topica.com = Cc: tom rhfweb.com Date: Saturday, June 02, 2001 7:51 PM Subject: Fwd: Candidate for universal gravitational glue =20 =20 Subj: Fw: Candidate for universal gravitational glue=20 Date: 6/2/01 11:41:42 AM Pacific Daylight Time=20 From: etimes teleport.com (Bruce Meland)=20 To: tom rhfweb.com=20 CC: conextom aol.com=20 =20 Hi Tom I believe some form of these neutrinos are the gravity = particles. Bruce=20 =20 =20 Candidate for universal gravitational glue=20 =20 =20 UPI Science News Thursday June 4 9:34 PM EDT TAKAYAMA, Japan, June 5 = (UPI) -=20 Researchers say they have identifed what may be the unseen = gravitational glue=20 _ the so-called dark matter responsible in part for the evolution of = the=20 universe from the moment of its birth: neutrinos. A serious = candidate for=20 this glue, neutrinos are invisible, sub- atomic particles, created = at the=20 time of the Big Bang, that stream through the Earth, people and = everything=20 else unfettered. The groundbreaking discovery, announced Friday in = Japan by=20 an international team of scientists, was that neutrinos have mass. = Because=20 the particles fill the universe, scientists say, collectively they = may have=20 the force to reverse its expansive course to cause the ``Big = Crunch.'' So=20 fundamental a discovery, they said at Neutrino '98, an international = physics=20 conference in Takayama, Japan, could help explain baffling puzzles = about the=20 nature of matter and the formation of the universe after the Big = Bang. The=20 discovery was the result of a two year, $100 million experiment by = an=20 international team of scientists. Dr. John G. Learned, a University = of Hawaii=20 physicist and one of the lead researchers, told United Press = International,=20 the discovery means neutrinos may account for the many gravitational = forces=20 apparent in astronomical observations that no one has ever been able = to=20 explain. ``This will go down as perhaps the one most important = discovery in=20 science in the decade,'' he said Thursday. ``It means that neutrinos = are=20 surely one of the more massive components of the universe.'' Dr. = David=20 Casper, a University of California-Irvine physicist and another team = member,=20 agreed, asserting the finding will help scientists understand ``how = galaxies=20 and other large scale structures in the universe interact = gravitationally.''=20 Until now, he said, scientists have been puzzled about the movements = of the=20 heavens, knowing that something was missing from their calculations, = and=20 describing the unknown variable as ``dark'' or ``missing'' matter. = This=20 discovery, Learned said, suggests that neutrinos have an aggregate=20 gravitational influence that may eventually be sufficient to reverse = the=20 universal expansion triggered by the Big Bang and cause a ``Big = Crunch.''=20 ``The discovery of neutrino mass is intimately connected with both = the=20 origins and ultimate fate of the universe,'' Casper said. ``We = suspected but=20 did not know that neutrinos had tiny mass. We didn't think of them = as making=20 up a part of our world, but in fact, the universe is full of = neutrinos. Every=20 cubic centimeter of the universe has about 200 or so neutrinos, = which are=20 left over from the Big Bang.'' The finding may also fill in the = blanks in=20 equations aimed at solving how particles acquire mass, ``one of the = deepest=20 unsolved questions of particle physics,'' Casper said. ``This will = help=20 astronomers understand something that puzzles them greatly _ why is = there=20 more gravitational force than they expect from the amount of stuff = the can=20 see out there,'' Casper added. Learned says neutrinos, until now = thought to=20 have no mass, may on the whole turn out to make up ``most of the = mass of the=20 universe. '' The discovery was made at Super-Kamiokande Observatory, = the=20 world's largest elementary particle detector, northwest of Tokyo. = Scientists=20 from 23 institutions in the United States, Japan, Poland and Korea = took part.=20 The team included Dr. Henry Sobel, also of UC-Irvine. Neutrinos, = similar to=20 electrons, have long been known to be a fundamental constituent of = nature.=20 But unlike electrons, neutrinos carry no electric charge, and thus = can pass=20 unimpeded through great distances in matter. This property, along = with their=20 invisibility, has made them extremely difficult to observe. = Scientists have=20 suspected for years that neutrinos might have a very small, but = non-zero,=20 mass, but never before could prove it. Casper said the discovery = won't=20 ``change the life of the average Joe'' but has profound implications = for=20 physicists and astrophysicsts. The finding also suggests, he said, = that the=20 gravitational influence of neutrinos may have been a catalyst for = the=20 collapse of the diffuse primordial gas into more dense regions that=20 eventually spawned galaxies, stars and planets. UC-Irvine issued a = statement=20 on behalf of its scientists asserting that the experiment had = yielded=20 ``results that are outside the standard theory of particle physics, = which=20 describes the fundamental constituents of matter and their = interactions.=20 Until now, there has been no firm evidence that neutrinos possess = mass.'' The=20 evidence was based upon studies of neutrinos created when cosmic = rays bombard=20 the Earth's upper atmosphere, producing storms of secndary particles = that=20 rain down constantly from the heavens. Most neutrinos pass through = the entire=20 planet unscathed, but have been detected passing through the = Super-Kamiokande=20 group's 50,000-ton tank of purified water 1,000 meters beneath the = surface.=20 The scientists noticed the neutrinos oscillated, or changed from one = type of=20 neutrino to another, something that could occur only if they have = mass. They=20 say in a joint statement that neutrinos ``must now be incorporated = into the=20 theoretical models of the structure of matter and that = astrophysicists=20 concerned with finding the 'missing' or 'dark matter' in the = universe must=20 now consider the neutrino as a serious candidate.'' Neutrinos were = created in=20 vast quantities in the first instants after the Big Bang and = permeate the=20 universe, Casper said. ``Because these leftover neutrinos are = everywhere,=20 even if they have a tiny mass, when you add them up, it adds up to = something=20 significant in terms of how galaxies and large scale structures in = the=20 universe gravitationally interact,'' Casper said. ``You have a = zillion things=20 which by themselves have almost no mass, but when you add them all = up, they=20 can have a large scale. This may now guide theorists in answering = the big=20 question _ why does everything have mass?'' Learned said, ``this is=20 fundamental science on the most basic scale,'' and its practical = applications=20 might not become evident for many years. Copyright 1998 by United = Press=20 International All rights reserved=20 =20 Respectively,=20 =20 President, Thomas Clark=20 Radiation Health Foundation (RHF) Inc.,=20 RHF Business web site at: http://www.rhfweb.com/=20 Personal website at http://www.rhfweb.com/personal=20 New Age Media Productions at=20 http://www.rhfweb.com/newage=20 Email: tom rhfweb.com=20 ------=_NextPart_000_0092_01C0ECDB.DE122D20 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
HI again Dr Clark; Did the other = email about=20 neutrinos from ABC News with photos of detectors get through to you from = me. I=20 lost some of your emails to me after i sent this to you. What part of = the US are=20 you located? Bruce  Meland, editor Electrifying Times
-----Original = Message-----
From:=20 ConexTom@aol.com <ConexTom@aol.com>
To: = vortex-l@eskimo.com <vortex-l@eskimo.com>; DEACH@topica.com <DEACH@topica.com>
Cc: = tom@rhfweb.com <tom@rhfweb.com>
Date:=20 Saturday, June 02, 2001 7:51 PM
Subject: Fwd: = Candidate for=20 universal gravitational glue

Subj: Fw: Candidate for = universal=20 gravitational glue
Date: 6/2/01 11:41:42 AM Pacific Daylight = Time=20
From:    etimes@teleport.com (Bruce = Meland)=20
To:    tom rhfweb.com
CC:    = conextom aol.com=20

Hi Tom I believe some form of these neutrinos are the = gravity=20 particles. Bruce


Candidate for universal gravitational glue=20


UPI Science News Thursday June 4 9:34 PM EDT TAKAYAMA, = Japan,=20 June 5 (UPI) -
Researchers say they have identifed what may be = the=20 unseen gravitational glue
_ the so-called dark matter = responsible in=20 part for the evolution of the
universe from the moment of its = birth:=20 neutrinos. A serious candidate for
this glue, neutrinos are = invisible,=20 sub- atomic particles, created at the
time of the Big Bang, that = stream=20 through the Earth, people and everything
else unfettered. The=20 groundbreaking discovery, announced Friday in Japan by
an = international=20 team of scientists, was that neutrinos have mass. Because
the = particles=20 fill the universe, scientists say, collectively they may have =
the force=20 to reverse its expansive course to cause the ``Big Crunch.'' So=20
fundamental a discovery, they said at Neutrino '98, an = international=20 physics
conference in Takayama, Japan, could help explain = baffling=20 puzzles about the
nature of matter and the formation of the = universe=20 after the Big Bang. The
discovery was the result of a two year, = $100=20 million experiment by an
international team of scientists. Dr. = John G.=20 Learned, a University of Hawaii
physicist and one of the lead=20 researchers, told United Press International,
the discovery = means=20 neutrinos may account for the many gravitational forces
apparent = in=20 astronomical observations that no one has ever been able to =
explain.=20 ``This will go down as perhaps the one most important discovery in=20
science in the decade,'' he said Thursday. ``It means that = neutrinos are=20
surely one of the more massive components of the universe.'' Dr. = David=20
Casper, a University of California-Irvine physicist and another = team=20 member,
agreed, asserting the finding will help scientists = understand=20 ``how galaxies
and other large scale structures in the universe = interact=20 gravitationally.''
Until now, he said, scientists have been = puzzled=20 about the movements of the
heavens, knowing that something was = missing=20 from their calculations, and
describing the unknown variable as = ``dark''=20 or ``missing'' matter. This
discovery, Learned said, suggests = that=20 neutrinos have an aggregate
gravitational influence that may = eventually=20 be sufficient to reverse the
universal expansion triggered by = the Big=20 Bang and cause a ``Big Crunch.''
``The discovery of neutrino = mass is=20 intimately connected with both the
origins and ultimate fate of = the=20 universe,'' Casper said. ``We suspected but
did not know that = neutrinos=20 had tiny mass. We didn't think of them as making
up a part of = our world,=20 but in fact, the universe is full of neutrinos. Every
cubic = centimeter=20 of the universe has about 200 or so neutrinos, which are
left = over from=20 the Big Bang.'' The finding may also fill in the blanks in =
equations=20 aimed at solving how particles acquire mass, ``one of the deepest=20
unsolved questions of particle physics,'' Casper said. ``This = will help=20
astronomers understand something that puzzles them greatly _ why = is=20 there
more gravitational force than they expect from the amount = of stuff=20 the can
see out there,'' Casper added. Learned says neutrinos, = until now=20 thought to
have no mass, may on the whole turn out to make up = ``most of=20 the mass of the
universe. '' The discovery was made at = Super-Kamiokande=20 Observatory, the
world's largest elementary particle detector, = northwest=20 of Tokyo. Scientists
from 23 institutions in the United States, = Japan,=20 Poland and Korea took part.
The team included Dr. Henry Sobel, = also of=20 UC-Irvine. Neutrinos, similar to
electrons, have long been known = to be a=20 fundamental constituent of nature.
But unlike electrons, = neutrinos carry=20 no electric charge, and thus can pass
unimpeded through great = distances=20 in matter. This property, along with their
invisibility, has = made them=20 extremely difficult to observe. Scientists have
suspected for = years that=20 neutrinos might have a very small, but non-zero,
mass, but never = before=20 could prove it. Casper said the discovery won't
``change the = life of the=20 average Joe'' but has profound implications for
physicists and=20 astrophysicsts. The finding also suggests, he said, that the=20
gravitational influence of neutrinos may have been a catalyst = for the=20
collapse of the diffuse primordial gas into more dense regions = that=20
eventually spawned galaxies, stars and planets. UC-Irvine issued = a=20 statement
on behalf of its scientists asserting that the = experiment had=20 yielded
``results that are outside the standard theory of = particle=20 physics, which
describes the fundamental constituents of matter = and=20 their interactions.
Until now, there has been no firm evidence = that=20 neutrinos possess mass.'' The
evidence was based upon studies of = neutrinos created when cosmic rays bombard
the Earth's upper = atmosphere,=20 producing storms of secndary particles that
rain down constantly = from=20 the heavens. Most neutrinos pass through the entire
planet = unscathed,=20 but have been detected passing through the Super-Kamiokande =
group's=20 50,000-ton tank of purified water 1,000 meters beneath the surface. =
The=20 scientists noticed the neutrinos oscillated, or changed from one = type of=20
neutrino to another, something that could occur only if they = have mass.=20 They
say in a joint statement that neutrinos ``must now be = incorporated=20 into the
theoretical models of the structure of matter and that=20 astrophysicists
concerned with finding the 'missing' or 'dark = matter' in=20 the universe must
now consider the neutrino as a serious = candidate.''=20 Neutrinos were created in
vast quantities in the first instants = after=20 the Big Bang and permeate the
universe, Casper said. ``Because = these=20 leftover neutrinos are everywhere,
even if they have a tiny = mass, when=20 you add them up, it adds up to something
significant in terms of = how=20 galaxies and large scale structures in the
universe = gravitationally=20 interact,'' Casper said. ``You have a zillion things
which by = themselves=20 have almost no mass, but when you add them all up, they
can have = a large=20 scale. This may now guide theorists in answering the big =
question _ why=20 does everything have mass?'' Learned said, ``this is
fundamental = science=20 on the most basic scale,'' and its practical applications
might = not=20 become evident for many years. Copyright 1998 by United Press=20
International All rights reserved

Respectively,=20

President, Thomas Clark
Radiation Health Foundation = (RHF) Inc.,=20
RHF Business web site at: http://www.rhfweb.com/ =
Personal=20 website at http://www.rhfweb.com/personal=20
New Age Media Productions at
http://www.rhfweb.com/newage=20
Email: tom@rhfweb.com=20
------=_NextPart_000_0092_01C0ECDB.DE122D20-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 4 11:20:07 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx2.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id LAA09050; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 11:04:17 -0700 (PDT) Resent-Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 11:04:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2001 11:02:08 -0700 From: Jones Beene Subject: Re: fusion reactor, correction To: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-to: jonesb9 pacbell.net Message-id: <0GEF00IB33HSXZ mta5.snfc21.pbi.net> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Opera 5.11 build 904 Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Resent-Message-ID: <"rEkcy3.0.FD2.Usy6x" mx2> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/42969 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: In an earlier post, it appears that I mispoke when I wrote: >Guys, he has a Farnsworth Fusor type device... Apparently the reactor is based instead a Mather plasma focus design. The builder (??) mentions Farnswoth, but his design is pulsed, whereas the Fusor is steady state. A Fusor IEC device invariably employs the distinctive spherical reactor which along with an internal grid creates a globular convergence zone that effectively mulitplies ion energies by orders of magnitude. The plasma focus, on the other hand, is normally a simpler layout which usually employs the brute force of a capacitor discharge to create fusion. Perhaps there has been an attempt to combine the features of both? JB From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 4 11:35:23 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id LAA18561; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 11:34:40 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 11:34:40 -0700 Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2001 11:31:28 -0700 From: Jones Beene Subject: Re: fusion reactor To: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-to: jonesb9 pacbell.net Message-id: <0GEF00JS54UOO8 mta5.snfc21.pbi.net> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Opera 5.11 build 904 Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Resent-Message-ID: <"NfAFF2.0.iX4.-Iz6x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/42973 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Having just read Christopher Arnold's patent application and come away hopelessly confused from the tiny drawing and the fact that it appears to be both a motor and a pulsed power source, I have e-mailed him directly at hypercom59 aol.com and invited him to join the forum and explain his device. Lets hope that he will oblige. Jones Beene From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 4 15:59:24 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id PAA02485; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 15:54:10 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 15:54:10 -0700 Message-ID: <000201c0ed3e$ae38fee0$d8181ad8 oemcomputer> From: "Bruce Meland" To: Subject: Fw: Aquino info on Anti Gravity Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 14:20:06 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_006B_01C0ED01.7444F3C0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Resent-Message-ID: <"XRkFs2.0.dc.G617x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/42974 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_006B_01C0ED01.7444F3C0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable -----Original Message----- From: Bruce Meland To: herman antioch-college.edu Cc: etimes teleport.com Date: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 8:58 AM Subject: Fw: Aquino info on Anti Gravity -- Yes, CSETI is Dr. Greer's organization. =20 Debbie ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Bruce Meland=20 To: Debbie Foch=20 Cc: etimes teleport.com=20 Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 12:56 PM Subject: Re: Aquino info on Anti Gravity =20 =20 Hi Debbie; Thanks for the information; didn't your orginization get = a big grant from Paul Allen? Or who's organization was that? Arn't you = Dr Greers Orginization? Maybe some of that money could go for this = project. Sincerely Bruce Meland editor www.electrifyingtimes.com=20 -----Original Message----- From: Debbie Foch To: Bruce Meland (by way of Tony Craddock ) = Date: Monday, February 26, 2001 11:41 AM Subject: Aquino info =20 =20 Bruce, =20 I just got this today. =20 Debbie ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Oilab Inc.=20 To: coordinator cseti.org=20 Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 2:25 PM Subject: Please help us =20 =20 To the founders of CSETI, Mankind is on the brink of Gravity manipulation in ways only = dreamed about since we began to reason. The effects are provable and = have been demonstrated in controlled conditions. This time is now upon = us to move forward and dispel the ignorance of the masses. I am = employing you for help in this regard. The efforts of Fran de Aquino, = myself, and others to reach the public have been limited. We need your = help. Dr. Aquino Is a professor of physics and I am a analytical chemist. We have = been successful in the gravity alteration aspects of common materials. = The implication is profound and undeniable. We can not depend on any = government agencies to bring the Truth to the rightful attention of = mankind. Either they refuse out of ignorance or have deeper alliterative = motives is unclear. I employ you, to see what we have done, and if you = agree, then I am positive you can be counted on to bring to our world = the truth, as many voices can not be ignored. Please help us. See my site at; http://www.icnet.net/users/chrish/cropcir.html=20 also; http://www.icnet.net/users/chrish/Photo-gravity.htm Fran de Aquino at ; http://www.elo.com.br/%7Edeaquino/ His paper is published on line at = http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/9905003%20 (Note: the HTML format corrupted many of the equations embodied = in its pages.) =20 Sincerely-=20 Chris Hardeman You can reach me by email; chrish icnet.net ------=_NextPart_000_006B_01C0ED01.7444F3C0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 
-----Original = Message-----
From:=20 Bruce Meland <etimes@teleport.com>
To:= herman@antioch-college.edu= <herman@antioch-college.edu= >
Cc:=20 etimes@teleport.com = <etimes@teleport.com>
Dat= e:=20 Wednesday, May 09, 2001 8:58 AM
Subject: Fw: Aquino info = on Anti=20 Gravity

 
--
Yes, CSETI is Dr. Greer's=20 organization.
 
Debbie
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Bruce=20 Meland
To: Debbie=20 Foch
Cc: etimes@teleport.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, = 2001 12:56=20 PM
Subject: Re: Aquino info on = Anti=20 Gravity

Hi Debbie; Thanks for the = information;=20 didn't your orginization get a big grant from Paul Allen? Or who's=20 organization was that? Arn't you Dr Greers Orginization? Maybe some = of that=20 money could go for this project. Sincerely Bruce Meland editor  = www.electrifyingtimes.com=20
-----Original=20 Message-----
From: Debbie Foch <coordinator@cseti.org>
To:=20 Bruce Meland (by way of Tony Craddock <webmaster@cseti.org>) = <etimes@teleport.com>
Dat= e:=20 Monday, February 26, 2001 11:41 AM
Subject: Aquino = info

Bruce,
 
I just got this = today.
 
Debbie
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Oilab = Inc.=20
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 2:25 PM
Subject: Please help us

To the founders of CSETI,

Mankind is on the brink of Gravity manipulation in ways only = dreamed=20 about since we began to reason. The effects are provable and = have been=20 demonstrated in controlled conditions. This time is now upon us = to move=20 forward and dispel the ignorance of the masses. I am employing = you for=20 help in this regard. The efforts of Fran de Aquino, myself, and = others=20 to reach the public have been limited. We need your help. Dr. = Aquino

Is a professor of physics and I am a analytical chemist. We = have been=20 successful in the gravity alteration aspects of common = materials. The=20 implication is profound and undeniable. We can not depend on any = government agencies to bring the Truth to the rightful attention = of=20 mankind. Either they refuse out of ignorance or have deeper = alliterative=20 motives is unclear. I employ you, to see what we have done, and = if you=20 agree, then I am positive you can be counted on to bring to our = world=20 the truth, as many voices can not be ignored. Please help = us.

See my site at; = http://www.icnet.net/users/chrish/cropcir.html

also; http://www.icnet.net/users/chrish/Photo-gravity.htm

Fran de Aquino at ; http://www.elo.com.br/%7Edeaquino/

His paper is published on line at=20 http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/9905003%20

(Note: the HTML format corrupted many of the equations = embodied in=20 its pages.)

 

Sincerely-

Chris Hardeman

You can reach me by email;=20 chrish icnet.net

------=_NextPart_000_006B_01C0ED01.7444F3C0-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 4 16:14:55 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id QAA08006; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 16:08:46 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 16:08:46 -0700 From: FZNIDARSIC aol.com Message-ID: Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 19:08:04 EDT Subject: air conditioner question To: vortex-l eskimo.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_ad.b8d53f0.284d6ed4_boundary" X-Mailer: AOL 6.0 for Windows US sub 10524 Resent-Message-ID: <"naoUi3.0.xy1.yJ17x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/42975 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: --part1_ad.b8d53f0.284d6ed4_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I have an older car with a R-12 air conditioner. The R-12 has leaked out over the years. I would like to update and add the new gas with a conversion kit. The kit states that the system does not need to be opened. The kit contains new oil. How do I get the old oil out with opening the system? Does anyone know the ins and outs about the R-12 to R-111 conversion? Frank Znidarsic fznidarsic aol.com --part1_ad.b8d53f0.284d6ed4_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I have an older car with a R-12 air conditioner.  The R-12 has leaked out
over the years.  I would like to update and add the new gas with a conversion
kit. The kit states that the system does not need to be opened.  The kit
contains new oil.  How do I get the old oil out with opening the system?  
Does anyone know the ins and outs about the R-12 to R-111 conversion?

Frank Znidarsic
fznidarsic aol.com
--part1_ad.b8d53f0.284d6ed4_boundary-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 4 19:09:21 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id TAA04794; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 19:06:07 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 19:06:07 -0700 From: Robin van Spaandonk To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Fwd: Candidate for universal gravitational glue Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2001 12:05:52 +1000 Organization: Improving Message-ID: References: <000301c0ed17$77a051c0$ef181ad8 oemcomputer> In-Reply-To: <000301c0ed17$77a051c0$ef181ad8 oemcomputer> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id TAA04757 Resent-Message-ID: <"6CFIK3.0.oA1.Ew37x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/42976 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: In reply to Bruce Meland's message of Mon, 4 Jun 2001 09:38:47 -0700: >After observing the energy generated from nutrino type particles, and >perhaps magnetic fields of earth and stars if they are present here on earth >in sufficient quanity(stars magnetic fields overlapping the earth), light >particles from the sun seem insignificant. Other cosmic rays, such as mesons >may also be involved. Bruce Face it Bruce, until someone comes up with a real stand alone device that pours out kWs, we aren't going to have a clue where the energy comes from, if indeed it does. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk A Future For Humanity see: http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ New model hydrogen atom see http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/New-hydrogen.html From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 4 19:30:28 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id TAA12221; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 19:29:16 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 19:29:16 -0700 Message-ID: <3B1C43F8.71A37E39 suite224.net> Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2001 22:29:12 -0400 From: "Francis J. Stenger" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Win95; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: air conditioner question References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"4T7aa3.0.g-2.wF47x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/42977 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: FZNIDARSIC aol.com wrote: > > I have an older car with a R-12 air conditioner. The R-12 has leaked > out > over the years. I would like to update and add the new gas with a > conversion > kit. The kit states that the system does not need to be opened. The > kit > contains new oil. How do I get the old oil out with opening the > system? > Does anyone know the ins and outs about the R-12 to R-111 conversion? Frank, try a "google" search on "refrigerant conversion". I picked the following page as a start: http://home.earthlink.net/~goodspeeds/ACCONVRT.HTM Maybe that will help? Frank Stenter From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 5 03:40:30 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id DAA10856; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 03:39:44 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 03:39:44 -0700 Message-ID: <004301c0eda3$1f9fea80$8e8f85ce computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: , Subject: Re: Ultraviolet Lamp Neutron Generator? Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 04:36:06 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Resent-Message-ID: <"9mHEF.0.Sf2.lRB7x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/42978 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: The quartz glass germicidal UV lamps in standard fluorescent tube configurations (4 ft, 40 watt T12 or such) if surrounded by a Boron tube, spaced to allow for an annular volume filled with D2 at atmospheric pressure might act as a source of neutrons stripped from deuterons. The 185 and 254 nanometer photons (~6.7 eV and 4.95 eV respectively) will dissociate the D2 to 2 D and possibly form a "Deuterino" which will dissociate into a Neutron and a Proton. The liberated neutrons can be used to fission Lithium 7 forming 2 He4 or Boron 10 forming He4 and Li7 concurrently releasing energy. I haven't the guts to try this. :-) Regards, Frederick From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 5 06:15:53 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id GAA21064; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 06:13:51 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 06:13:51 -0700 Message-ID: <3B1CDB24.D528A4CB bellsouth.net> Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2001 09:14:12 -0400 From: Terry Blanton X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: air conditioner question References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"lg37m.0.295.FiD7x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/42979 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: FZNIDARSIC aol.com wrote: > How do I get the old oil out with opening > the system? The oil went out with the refrigerant since the two travel together in the system. You should leak test the system by pulling a vacuum. The seals will often degrade in an unpressurized system. This will also bring out any moisture that has infiltrated. Terry From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 5 10:26:20 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id KAA18741; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 10:22:45 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 10:22:45 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Sender: mjones pop.jump.net Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <024e01c0e54e$0d140700$9731b43f computer> References: Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 12:19:41 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Mitchell Jones Subject: Re: Primordial Gas Cloud Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id KAA18708 Resent-Message-ID: <"KSWFm3.0.la4.aLH7x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/42981 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Fred Sparber wrote: >I picked 5.2 AU (The Mean Orbit of Jupiter) or less, as a radius wrt the >Sun in AU >where the onslaught of Photon Pressure and Solar Wind might allow a Moon like > Europa to retain it's atmosphere. > >IOW, the Jovian planets would be a lot smaller if they were closer to the >Sun. :-) >> Your concept is that >> photon pressure from the sun will tend to resist the movement of individual >> gas molecules toward the sun, and I will grant that. However, the question >> of interest in each case is how far out from the sun does the photon >> pressure exceed the pull of gravity on the molecule, and I see no simple >> way to compute that without knowing the photon impact cross section of the >> molecule in question, and I would have no idea where to obtain that >> information. (You can't just sum the cross-sectional areas of the outer >> orbits of the atoms in the molecule, because many photons will pass through >> that area without hitting anything.) Therefore, how about supplying a >> detailed calculation, so that I can better evaluate what you are saying? > >Tomorrow soon enough? ***{Since "tomorrow" would have been May 26 and it is now June 5, I assume you have been no more successful in obtaining the needed cross-sections than I. Therefore I am going to make a run at this by simply assuming that the cross-sectional area of the ground-state electron orbit will reflect every photon that tries to pass through it. Using that assumption, the calculated photon pressure on an atomic system will be considerably larger than is actually the case, and the radius of your "bubble" will accordingly be larger as well. Nevertheless, it seems worthwhile to calculate what that radius actually is, so that we can see the limitations of your idea a bit more clearly. The insolation at Earth's orbit is about 1360 watts/m^2, so total solar luminosity is 1360(4¼r^2) = 1360{4¼[(93x10^6)(5280)(12)(2.54)/100]^2} = 3.83x10^26 watts, or 3.83x10^33 ergs/sec. Therefore the generalized expression for insolation is 3.83x10^33/4¼r^2 = 3.05x10^32/r^2 ergs/cm^2-sec. The typical solar photon has a wavelength of about w = 4700 Å and an energy of E = hc/w = (6.62x10^-27)(3x10^10)/(4700)(10^-8) = 4.23x10^-12 ergs. Thus the number of such photons per sec per cm^2 is N = (3.05x10^32/r^2 ergs/cm^2-sec)/(4.23x10^-12 ergs) = (7.21x10^43/r^2)/cm^2-sec. Each such photon, depending on its point of impact, will impart to the hydrogen atom a momentum away from the sun that varies from 2E/c for a center hit to 0 for a negligible grazing impact. Thus I am going to take E/c as the average change in momentum per impact--that is: E/c = (4.23x10^-12 ergs)/(3x10^10 cm/sec) = 1.41x10^-22 erg-sec/cm. The solar photon pressure per unit area on a hydrogen atom is therefore P = N(E/c) = (7.21x10^43/r^2/cm^2-sec)(1.41x10^-22 erg-sec/cm) = 1.02x10^22/r^2 erg-sec/cm^3-sec = 1.02x10^22/r^2 ergs/cm^3 = 1.02x10^22/r^2 dynes/cm^2. The cross-sectional area of the electron shell of a ground-state hydrogen atom is A = ¼r^2 = ¼(.53x10^-8)^2 = 8.8x10^-17 cm^2. Therefore the outward force exerted by solar radiation on a monoatomic hydrogen atom is roughly Fo = P*A = (1.02x10^22/r^2 dynes/cm^2)(8.8x10^-17 cm^2) = 8.95x10^5/r^2 dynes. The inward force exerted by the sun's gravity on a monoatomic hydrogen atom is Fi = GMm/r^2 = (6.67x10^-8)(1.9891x10^33)(1.657x10^-24)/r^2 = 2.20x10^2/r^2 dynes. The implication: Fo is always greater than Fi--which means hydrogen gas cannot approach the sun. More importantly, both photon pressure and gravitational force vary as the inverse square of the distance from the sun. Result: if for a particular molecular species Fo > Fi at any radius, then Fo > Fi at *every* radius. Since at the outer limit of the Fred Sparber bubble Fo = Fi, it follows that the Fred Sparber bubble does not, and cannot, exist. --Mitchell Jones}*** > >OTOH, watching the separated tail of a comet move around like a >"Con-Trail" from a >jet-liner gives an good >indication of Solar Photon-Wind sweeping action. ***{Yes, but there is no "bubble." If at any distance from the sun the photon repulsion of a gas molecule is greater than the gravitational attraction, that will be the case at all distances. Thus the only way molecules of the banned species can approach the sun is if they are aggregated together in larger bodies. (Since the attractive gravitational force on an object is proportional to the cube of its radius and the photon repulsion is proportional to the square of its radius, the aggregation of molecules into larger particles shifts the balance in favor of attraction.) The implication is that the sun isn't sweeping up any gases--or, at least, any light gases. Instead, individual atoms and molecules in the space surrounding the sun must aggregate into larger particles--e.g., crystals of methane, ammonia, carbon dioxide, or water ice--before the balance can be shifted in favor of attraction. Moreover, since the surfaces of such aggregates are blasted away by photon pressure as the sun is approached, they must be rather large to actually make it into the sun itself. Therefore in the region outside the planetary disc there must be a mind-boggling accumulation of orbiting ice crystals, comets, and dust, due simply to the sun's rejection of small objects that approach it. By repelling the low-mass molecules, it ensures that they will eventually aggregate together into larger objects--e.g., small comets--before they are finally able to move into the inner solar system. Bottom line: if the pioneer anomaly is due to the effects of aether flow outward along the planetary disc, as I have suggested, then there should be a continuous movement of small comets into the planetary disc from the regions above and below it. --Mitchell Jones}*** >Regards, Frederick ________________ Quote of the month: "Always strive to be accurate, even when it doesn't matter, so that you can be accurate when it does matter." --Jude Acers From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 5 10:26:24 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id KAA18721; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 10:22:42 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 10:22:42 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Sender: mjones pop.jump.net Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <6cqlhtgqf206395muma5pi17a9cbik8b28 4ax.com> References: <65.1547c792.284aff04 aol.com> <65.1547c792.284aff04@aol.com> Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 11:55:44 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Mitchell Jones Subject: Problem of the Missing Mass Resent-Message-ID: <"80rM02.0.Oa4.YLH7x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/42980 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Robin van Spaandonk wrote: >No, the "missing mass" isn't the mass of the magnetic fields. The >premise that mass is missing is based on the false assumption that the >only force holding galaxies together is the gravitational force. >No account is taken of the magnetic attraction between stellar magnetic >fields and the galactic magnetic field. >BTW I just shot myself in the foot. Since the sun's field reverses every >11 years, it should result in the sun being alternately attracted and >repelled by the galactic field, which in turn would result in an erratic >course for the sun, which AFAIK is not in evidence. :(. ***{I don't think it is within the capabilities of present-day astronomy to detect an 11-year oscillation in the sun's motion due to the flipping of its magnetic field. Why do I say that? Simply because the types of oscillations that I have actually seen discussed were vastly greater in scale than that, and were usually described to merely a couple of significant digits of accuracy. For example, the sun is known to follow a sinusoidal trajectory as it swings in a gradual spiral around the center of the galaxy, moving in a regular cycle first above the galactic disc, then below it, etc. (When the sun moves above the galactic disc, there is more mass below it than above, and so like a pendulum moving past the center of its arc, the sun slow down, then stops, then begins to accelerate back toward the galactic disc. It reaches its maximum downward velocity as it pass through the plane of the galactic disc, after which it begins to slow again as it moves further and further below the disc, until it stops, reverses its course, and begins to accelerate in the upward direction. Etc.) However, I have never seen the period of this cycle given to more than two-digit accuracy--e.g., 33 million years--and even in that case errors as large as 20% in the number were explicitly declared to be feasible. [See *Nemesis: The Death Star*, by Dr. Richard Muller, pg. 95-96. See also http://muller.lbl.gov/pages/lbl-nem.htm. (This site is fascinating, by the way.)] The implication: if a contemporary astronomer found himself able to intelligently discuss an 11-year cycle in the sun's motion, he would think he had died and gone to heaven! :-) Bottom line: if your theory is refuted, I don't think the reasoning will involve disproving an 11-year oscillation in the sun's motion. By the way, my personal opinion is that the missing gravitational mass is simply the mass of the aether within each galaxy. As I have pointed out repeatedly in the past, Michelson considered the Michelson-Morley experiment (1887) to be a virtual proof of what he called the "entrained aether theory," according to which Earth carried a vast, rotating pool of aether with it as it moved around the sun. Result: the aether wind at the surface of Earth was far less than non-entrained aether theorists expected, and, indeed, was far less than the experiment was capable of detecting. As I have noted previously, I believe that the primary aether flow near Earth's surface is downward near the poles and upward near the equator. This occurs because the Earth's rotation causes it to act like a big squirrel-cage blower (i.e., a centrifugal air pump), sucking aether in at the poles and hurling it outward along its equator. Unfortunately, such a pattern produces an aether crosswind that would have acted equally on both legs of the horizontally oriented Michelson interferometer which was used in the M-M experiment, leading to a null result. (It is my view that each aether particle has a very small, non-zero gravitational mass, and thus that *gravitation* is the mechanism by which the aether is entrained. Motions within the pool of entrained aether, on the other hand, are caused primarily by rotation of the gravitating body, which gives rise to the centrifugal pump flow pattern described above.) In the case of the vast collections of solid bodies known as galaxies, however, the squirrel-cage blower circulation pattern is reversed. This occurs because galaxies have "black holes" at their centers where matter is crushed into the microparticles that LeSage referred to as "ultramundane corpuscles." (Ultramundane corpuscles were the active agents in his push theory of gravity.) It is my view that beams of ultramundane corpuscles are being shot out from the center of the galaxy along its polar axis, both above and below the galactic disk. Result: aether is being sucked in along the galactic plane and swallowed up by the "black hole" at the center of the galaxy. This centrally-directed flow of aether along the galactic disc sweeps other material, especially dust and gases, toward the galactic center. Result: objects that would otherwise be in orbit around the center are deflected into spirals that eventually carry them into the black hole at the center of the galaxy. Since the clouds of dust and gases become more and more concentrated toward the center, their slowing effects on the movements of large masses increase toward the center. Result: the closer a star is to the galactic center, the further its velocity around that center is going to fall below the velocity that would be necessary to maintain a circular orbit at that distance, and the steeper its spiral toward the black hole is going to be. The implication: it is only the motions of the outermost stars in a galaxy that are going to be moving fast enough to hold approximately circular orbits, and so it is only their velocities that can be used to estimate the galactic mass via the formula M = rV^2/G. And, as noted above, the reason the calculated value of M is much larger than the visible matter in the galaxy would indicate is simply that most of the gravitational mass of the galaxy is bound up in the aether which it contains. --Mitchell Jones}*** ________________ Quote of the month: "Always strive to be accurate, even when it doesn't matter, so that you can be accurate when it does matter." --Jude Acers From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 5 10:36:22 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id KAA23960; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 10:33:24 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 10:33:24 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Sender: mjones pop.jump.net Message-Id: Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 12:31:39 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Mitchell Jones Subject: Lunar Meteor Impact Rate Resent-Message-ID: <"Iitu42.0.Bs5.aVH7x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/42982 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Here is a shocker: the current lunar meteor impact rate is the largest that it has been in the last 4.5 billion years! The sun is evidently plowing into a rather dense region of the primordial gas cloud. (See http://muller.lbl.gov/papers/lunarAbstract.htm#Anchor-plot-53377.) --MJ ________________ Quote of the month: "Always strive to be accurate, even when it doesn't matter, so that you can be accurate when it does matter." --Jude Acers From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 5 11:28:54 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id LAA17861; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 11:26:15 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 11:26:15 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Sender: mjones pop.jump.net Message-Id: Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 13:21:13 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Mitchell Jones Subject: Nemesis: The Death Star Resent-Message-ID: <"RsU06.0.zM4.6HI7x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/42983 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Today I sent the following note to Dr. Richard Muller: "Hi Richard. I read your book, *Nemesis: The Death Star* several years ago. The other day, while flipping through it again, it occurred to me that Nemesis doesn't really have to be in orbit around the sun (Sol). Suppose, instead, that as Sol bobs up and down in its roughly circular spiral path around the center of the galaxy, Nemesis is following a similar trajectory, but with the following difference: Sol bobs up and down with a period of roughly 26 million years, and Nemesis bobs up and down with a period of roughly 52 million years. Result: on every half-cycle, which will be about 26 million years, Nemesis will cross the galactic plane--which means: it will pass near Sol and disrupt the Oort comet cloud. Result: a rain of comets into the inner solar system. If this theory is correct, then Nemesis would not have to be a red dwarf: it could be a much larger star that is typically much farther from the sun than the .73 pc which you supposed in your book (pg. 106). What do you think? --Mitchell Jones" I don't know whether he will respond to my note or not, but if anyone in the group has any comments or criticisms of my modification to his theory, I'm all ears. (For background on Dr. Muller's theory, see http://muller.lbl.gov/pages/lbl-nem.htm.) --Mitchell Jones ________________ Quote of the month: "Always strive to be accurate, even when it doesn't matter, so that you can be accurate when it does matter." --Jude Acers From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 5 13:23:09 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id NAA03728; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 13:20:02 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 13:20:02 -0700 Message-ID: <008801c0edf2$54042440$df181ad8 oemcomputer> From: "Bruce Meland" To: "Remy C." Cc: Subject: Fw: Regarding Death Threats - and how to avoid them... Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 11:56:54 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Resent-Message-ID: <"DKf5Z1.0.5w.nxJ7x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/42984 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: -----Original Message----- From: Patrick Bailey To: BCC: UFO_Send_List ; pgb@padrak.com (BCC: Special Secret_Send List) Date: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 11:58 AM Subject: Regarding Death Threats - and how to avoid them... >The recent email about "KPFA Radio Report of ETs at Government >Installations" has prompted me to discuss "death threats". > >You will recall that "death threats" have been used to close down >serious inquiries of several important investigations - >What Really Happened at Roswell, for one. > >In this radio show instance, the death threats were made at the >speakers - and maybe even the radio show host (I don't know). > >At Roswell in 1947, regardless of what really happened there, >security was effectively enforced by not only threatening the >witnesses, but moreover also threatening the families and children of >the witnesses. > >My concern is: Are you willing to live a life based on fear? > >The so-called secret Masonic legend of "the widow's son" rings loud >and clear in my ears! > >If you have information that is worth sharing, or if you know of >someone who has information worth sharing, then get the information >OUT in such a way, that the source remains "hidden". What matters is >(1) the message, and (2) the integrity of the message - i.e. that it >is true so far as the witness knows. > >I can't begin to tell you how many facts you see in the US Press and >on TV are absolute LIES - because of people living out of fear. > >If you want to live that way - get out of all UFO inquiries, >alternate energy inquiries, AIDS inquiries, and Health inquiries - >and eat at McDonald's until you die. > >I will support those who get the truth out, while maintaining their >integrity, and while maintaining their life and liberty. > >In case you have forgotten, chess is played by TWO players, and no >religious book ever published has ever said that people have to >always be nice. > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 5 13:23:18 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id NAA04075; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 13:20:56 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 13:20:56 -0700 Message-ID: <008e01c0edf2$70a98400$df181ad8 oemcomputer> From: "Bruce Meland" To: Subject: Fw: KPFA Radio Report of ETs at Government Installations Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 12:05:07 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Resent-Message-ID: <"-QyZ23.0.T_.cyJ7x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/42985 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: -----Original Message----- From: Patrick Bailey To: BCC: UFO_Send_List ; pgb@padrak.com (BCC: Special Secret_Send List) Date: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 11:59 AM Subject: FWD: KPFA Radio Report of ETs at Government Installations >FWD: KPFA Radio Report of ETs at Government Installations > >Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2001 21:16:43 -0700 >From: drboylan >To: ufotruth ,drrichboylanreports > >Subject: KPFA Radio Report of ETs at Government Installations >X-Rcpt-To: pgb padrak.com > >Prefatory Message from Richard Boylan, Ph.D.: > >I heard this tape from KPFA-FM, Berkeley, and know the >interviewer-producer, Ralph Steiner. Ralph is a professional >journalist and man of integrty, and has paid dearly for bring these >interviews to public attention by broasdcast. He was aided in the >research by Michael Lindemann. > >The brave citizens whose testimony fills this electrifying tape merit >our admiration and appreciation for their courage in coming forward >during the height of the UFO Cover-Up (1991). > >I doubt that Mr. Steiner will make copies of the KPFA tape available, >since he has been warned that the witnesses will be killed if it is >aired again. But KPFA's Berkeley station contact phone number should >be available from information at (510) 555-1212. > >FYI, Dr. Michael Wolf has corroborated the high-tech, >electromagnetic, ET-containment field technology described by one of >the contractors interviewed as being used at Haystack Air Force >Laboratory deep under Haystack Buttes in east Edwards Air Force Base, >near Lancaster, CA. > >- Richard Boylan, Ph.D. > >WITNESSES CLAIM THEY SAW ALIENS AT U.S. BASES > >By Elaine Douglass > >The U.S. government has a close working relationship with alien >beings, three unnamed witnesses told a California radio station in a >program aired in June. > >The four-hour program, produced and broadcast by KPFA-FM in Berkeley, >Calif., ranged widely over the UFO topic, but the most explosive >segments were the testimony of a construction contractor who said he >saw aliens at Edwards Air Force Base and at the China Lake Naval >Weapons facility in California; the testimony of a man who described >"saucers" being launched from a Northrop facility near Edwards; and a >woman's second-hand account of a meeting between aliens and U.S. >military officers. > >Moreover, it now appears that KPFA's voice in the UFO area has been silenced. > >Although in June the program producer Ralph Steiner promised >additional coverage of the UFO issue in future broadcasts, inquires >from the Forum were met with this blunt message from Mr. Steiner: "Do >not re-broadcast the tape. Persons whose testimony is on the tape >have been threatened and their lives are in danger." Subsequent >inquiries from The Forum to Mr. Steiner have gone unanswered. > >The Forum has obtained a tape of the KPFA broadcast. What follows is >a summary and excerpts from witness: > >No. 1. > >According to the KPFA broadcast, the interviews were conducted in >April 1991 in communities surrounding Edwards Air Force Base in the >Antelope Valley of Southern California. Witness No. 1 described >himself as a Vietnam veteran, former Green Beret, military >medal-holder, and a licensed general contractor who has worked on >construction projects at Chuna Lake and at Nellis, Scott, Edwards, >and Andrews Air Force Bases. The projects, the witness said, were >"mostly underground." > >* Underground Structures, Alien Beings > >Each of these facilities has extensive underground installations, and >they are "definitely not normal military structures," the witness >said. He described 4-foot thick concrete walls and >electronically-controlled oval-shaped doorways. "In one building I >worked on at Edwards, called Haystack Buttes, [Haystack USAF >Laboratory - R.Boylan] it took us over 5 minutes to get from the top >to the bottom by elevator," the witness said. "We estimated it was 30 >stories deep." It was here that the witness first saw an alien. "We >were walking down a hall," the witness said, "and these doors opened >and there was a very particular person or things that caught my eye >for an instant. This man was over seven feet tall. I'd say between 8 >and 9 to 10 feet, wearing a lab jacket and talking to two [human] >engineers. > >"This man's arms were almost down to his knees! It threw me into >shock," the witness said. "And then the doors closed. Security saw us >and told us to get out of there. Next day I walked off the job," the >witness said. > >Asked if the being he saw was a human, the witness replied, >"Definitely not. He had big slanted eyes. A big head. Fingers were >extremely long. Greenish skin." The witness said he saw the being for >"just a couple of seconds. Three-quarters of its face is what I saw >and I said, this guy would make a hell of a basketball player!" > >* One Witness Scared, the Other Dead > >The witness said his co-worker " 'bout died" when he too saw the >being. The witness compared the height of the being to the height of >the humans standing next to it. He said he knew one of the humans, >whose height he estimated at 6 feet 6 inches. > >Witness No. 1 described a second encounter with aliens. He said he >and co-workers saw "greys" at the China Lake [Naval Weapons Research >Station, near Ridgecrest, CA - R Boylan] naval facility. > >"They [security] thought we had left--me and two other guys. But we >decided to stay over and finish this job. We walked past a hangar and >we could see through a window," the witness said. > >"One of the guys I was with, Paul, he saw them first. He said, 'Come >here! Hurry up! I want to show you something!' And we looked in the >window and there's these four little grey guys about 3 feet tall. > >"Right then, security saw us and they told us, 'We thought you guys >left.' And they escorted us and said, 'You're not allowed around this >hangar. This hangar is off- limits to everybody. You'll get yourself >shot.' > >"And it messed with Paul's mind so much that every chance he got he >snuck over there. He finally got caught and was kicked off the base. >About three months later they found him mysteriously dead in Orange >County. This kind of put a scare in me. I know why not to mess with >something," the witness said. > >"After that I said, Ain't nobody pulling the blanket over my head any >more. l know what's going on now. I know what I saw at Edwards is >real. Somebody's playing games with us," the witness said. > >It should be noted that KPFA is one of five "Pacifica" stations, the >first of which was founded in the late 1940s. The Pacifica stations, >in New York, Berkeley, Los Angeles, Fresno, and Washington, D.C., are >alternative, non- commercial and listener-sponsored, with a long >tradition of political activism and precedent-making First Amendment >struggles. > >++++++++++++++++++++++ > >Shared by: >Richard J. Boylan, Ph.D., CCHT, LLC >Post Office Box 22310 >Sacramento, CA 95822, USA. >(916) 422-7479 >E-mail: drboylan jps.net >URL: www.jps.net/drboylan > >You are invited to join his informational reports and conversations >on-line list, UFOTruth by going to http://UFOTruth.listbot.com and >clicking on the Subscribe button and following directions. > >You may instead wish to join his personal reports-only list (no >conversations), DrRichBoylanReports by subscribing at: >http://DrRichBoylanReports.listbot.com > > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 5 13:50:51 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id NAA08569; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 13:32:49 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 13:32:49 -0700 From: Hypercom59 aol.com Message-ID: Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 16:32:13 EDT Subject: RE: Fusion Reactor To: vortex-L eskimo.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 5.0 for Windows sub 124 Resent-Message-ID: <"kDDlL3.0.d52.l7K7x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/42986 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Greeting to all list members, Thank you for allowing me to participate in this forum. I will do my best to answer any questions you may have about this strange device which I will soon have a US patent on. There are some topics I cannot comment about, however they relate to current and future projects that are direct derivative of the pulsed plasma technology. Even though I personally wrote my patent to be a blueprint to construction, it is for the most part - unheard of technology. The device should be looked upon as a complete system, not just a motor, generator, Pulsed Plasma producer or a particle accelerator - it is all of these things and much more. Fusion and Richard Hull. Even though I have never met Richard, I respect him and his relentless pursuit of Farnsworth's gifts to us all. Without Dr. Hull - Farnsworth might not even be a memory. In our communications he has always been professional and scientific. Please allow me to provide his fusor neutron count as he calculated it at 200,000 N/sec. I am an explorer and experimenter, not a scientist as fellow list members are. I have built a strange device indeed - and I have been seeking solid scientific validation, however testing has been elusive. I may not articulate in standard scientific nomenclature - for this I apologize, however I will do my best to be understood. Best wishes to all, Chris Arnold From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 5 14:31:15 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id OAA27320; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 14:29:57 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 14:29:57 -0700 From: Robin van Spaandonk To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Ultraviolet Lamp Neutron Generator? Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2001 07:29:47 +1000 Organization: Improving Message-ID: <7mjqht0gor6bha721vu76cgl114f7rrpvq 4ax.com> References: <004301c0eda3$1f9fea80$8e8f85ce computer> In-Reply-To: <004301c0eda3$1f9fea80$8e8f85ce computer> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id OAA27285 Resent-Message-ID: <"MZWGc2.0.og6.LzK7x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/42987 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: In reply to Frederick Sparber's message of Tue, 5 Jun 2001 04:36:06 -0500: [snip] >The liberated neutrons can be used to fission Lithium 7 forming 2 He4 or Boron 10 >forming He4 and Li7 concurrently releasing energy. > >I haven't the guts to try this. :-) [snip] I wouldn't worry too much Fred, Dr. Mills does his damnedest to create hydrinos, and AFAIK has seen very little if any nuclear activity. I think most of his shrunken particles escape before they shrink far enough to do any "good". Regards, Robin van Spaandonk A Future For Humanity see: http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ New model hydrogen atom see http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/New-hydrogen.html From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 5 14:41:42 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id OAA32447; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 14:40:38 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 14:40:38 -0700 Message-ID: <000801c0edfd$70f6b8a0$50181ad8 oemcomputer> From: "Bruce Meland" To: Cc: , , Subject: Re: Barn roof free energy Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 13:23:51 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Resent-Message-ID: <"gVxFb1.0.Xw7.F7L7x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/42988 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: The book is not too much on his intrepretation of key free energy systems just some very basic and extensive information that Peter has spent many years gathering about the Gray Motor Patents and experimentation and also some similar on Tesla's radiant energy devices. You can save a lot of time and money doing a literature search before trying your ideas out in experimentation. I am not sure who this Frederick character is but he sounds pretty closeminded, know it all, perhaps a very regimented German or Dutchman. I would like to know what sucesses he has had in the energy or other related fields. I know a few inventors that have found how to heat water in a revolutionary way and will be visiting one soon but i am sure he is not going to share his key secrets on any level with some know it all vortexians or want all info for free. Most of the good talented inventors have spent 10 years and thousands of dollars of their hard earned money, getting their free energy devices to an acceptable level or gathering information and printing a book and can't afford to take the time to answer all questions. Most real talented inventors do not need to waste their time networking the net. Bruce -----Original Message----ed From: thomas malloy To: vortex-l eskimo.com Date: Sunday, June 03, 2001 11:22 PM Subject: Re: Barn roof free energy >>----- Original Message ----- >>From: "Bruce Meland" >>To: >>Cc: ; ; >>Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2001 12:47 PM >>Subject: Re: Barn roof free energy >> >>Bruce, >> >>I think you would've been better off to have spent that $37.00 plus S & H on a >>"Shrink". :-) >> >>Regards, Frederick > >I agree, I linked to Dr. Lindermann's site from Jerry Decker's site. >I asked him some pointed questions. I have yet to receive a reply. >Bottom line, anybody can write a book, but it takes a break through >to heat water. > >> >> >>> I think you serious tinkerers would save a lot of time and money if you >>> purchased the recent published book "The Free Energy Secrets of Cold >> > Electricity by Dr. Peter Lindemann for about $37, includes shipping and > > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 5 14:50:15 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id OAA03070; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 14:49:28 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 14:49:28 -0700 Message-ID: <009201c0ee00$ac020c80$8e8f85ce computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: Cc: Subject: Re: The Primordial Gas Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 15:46:55 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0006_01C0EDD6.BF1B5E40" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Resent-Message-ID: <"AJgjJ1.0.sl.dFL7x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/42990 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0006_01C0EDD6.BF1B5E40 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit http://spaceprojects.arc.nasa.gov/Space_Projects/pioneer/f23.gif ------=_NextPart_000_0006_01C0EDD6.BF1B5E40 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="f23.gif.url" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="f23.gif.url" [DEFAULT] BASEURL=http://spaceprojects.arc.nasa.gov/Space_Projects/pioneer/f23.gif [InternetShortcut] URL=http://spaceprojects.arc.nasa.gov/Space_Projects/pioneer/f23.gif Modified=209C6C7B00EEC00152 ------=_NextPart_000_0006_01C0EDD6.BF1B5E40-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 5 14:50:17 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id OAA02955; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 14:49:08 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 14:49:08 -0700 Message-ID: <008701c0edff$742ca460$8e8f85ce computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: Cc: References: Subject: Re: Primordial Gas Cloud Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 15:37:18 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Resent-Message-ID: <"GgSML1.0.5k.KFL7x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/42989 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mitchell Jones" To: Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 12:19 PM Subject: Re: Primordial Gas Cloud I think you missed the mark, Mr. Jones. The gravitational force of the Sun on a water molecule at 5.0 AU is ~ 7.1E-30 newtons. The force from a 2.5 eV photon on a water molecule is ~1.3E-27 newtons. Since (~ 80%) of the ~ 54 watts/meter^2 from the Sun at is in the infrared (~ 0.1 eV to ~1.7eV) the photon pressure CAN create a "Bubble" of 10 AU Diameter or less. Go figure, and study up on the Heliopause. :-) Regards, Frederick > Fred Sparber wrote: > > >I picked 5.2 AU (The Mean Orbit of Jupiter) or less, as a radius wrt the > >Sun in AU > >where the onslaught of Photon Pressure and Solar Wind might allow a Moon like > > Europa to retain it's atmosphere. > > > >IOW, the Jovian planets would be a lot smaller if they were closer to the > >Sun. :-) > >> Your concept is that > >> photon pressure from the sun will tend to resist the movement of individual > >> gas molecules toward the sun, and I will grant that. However, the question > >> of interest in each case is how far out from the sun does the photon > >> pressure exceed the pull of gravity on the molecule, and I see no simple > >> way to compute that without knowing the photon impact cross section of the > >> molecule in question, and I would have no idea where to obtain that > >> information. (You can't just sum the cross-sectional areas of the outer > >> orbits of the atoms in the molecule, because many photons will pass through > >> that area without hitting anything.) Therefore, how about supplying a > >> detailed calculation, so that I can better evaluate what you are saying? > > > >Tomorrow soon enough? > > ***{Since "tomorrow" would have been May 26 and it is now June 5, I assume > you have been no more successful in obtaining the needed cross-sections > than I. Therefore I am going to make a run at this by simply assuming that > the cross-sectional area of the ground-state electron orbit will reflect > every photon that tries to pass through it. Using that assumption, the > calculated photon pressure on an atomic system will be considerably larger > than is actually the case, and the radius of your "bubble" will accordingly > be larger as well. Nevertheless, it seems worthwhile to calculate what that > radius actually is, so that we can see the limitations of your idea a bit > more clearly. > > The insolation at Earth's orbit is about 1360 watts/m^2, so total solar > luminosity is 1360(4¼r^2) = 1360{4¼[(93x10^6)(5280)(12)(2.54)/100]^2} = > 3.83x10^26 watts, or 3.83x10^33 ergs/sec. > > Therefore the generalized expression for insolation is 3.83x10^33/4¼r^2 = > 3.05x10^32/r^2 ergs/cm^2-sec. > > The typical solar photon has a wavelength of about w = 4700 Å and an energy > of E = hc/w = (6.62x10^-27)(3x10^10)/(4700)(10^-8) = 4.23x10^-12 ergs. > > Thus the number of such photons per sec per cm^2 is N = (3.05x10^32/r^2 > ergs/cm^2-sec)/(4.23x10^-12 ergs) = (7.21x10^43/r^2)/cm^2-sec. > > Each such photon, depending on its point of impact, will impart to the > hydrogen atom a momentum away from the sun that varies from 2E/c for a > center hit to 0 for a negligible grazing impact. Thus I am going to take > E/c as the average change in momentum per impact--that is: E/c = > (4.23x10^-12 ergs)/(3x10^10 cm/sec) = 1.41x10^-22 erg-sec/cm. > > The solar photon pressure per unit area on a hydrogen atom is therefore P = > N(E/c) = (7.21x10^43/r^2/cm^2-sec)(1.41x10^-22 erg-sec/cm) = 1.02x10^22/r^2 > erg-sec/cm^3-sec = 1.02x10^22/r^2 ergs/cm^3 = 1.02x10^22/r^2 dynes/cm^2. > > The cross-sectional area of the electron shell of a ground-state hydrogen > atom is A = ¼r^2 = ¼(.53x10^-8)^2 = 8.8x10^-17 cm^2. > > Therefore the outward force exerted by solar radiation on a monoatomic > hydrogen atom is roughly Fo = P*A = (1.02x10^22/r^2 dynes/cm^2)(8.8x10^-17 > cm^2) = 8.95x10^5/r^2 dynes. > > The inward force exerted by the sun's gravity on a monoatomic hydrogen atom > is Fi = GMm/r^2 = (6.67x10^-8)(1.9891x10^33)(1.657x10^-24)/r^2 = > 2.20x10^2/r^2 dynes. > > The implication: Fo is always greater than Fi--which means hydrogen gas > cannot approach the sun. > > More importantly, both photon pressure and gravitational force vary as the > inverse square of the distance from the sun. Result: if for a particular > molecular species Fo > Fi at any radius, then Fo > Fi at *every* radius. > > Since at the outer limit of the Fred Sparber bubble Fo = Fi, it follows > that the Fred Sparber bubble does not, and cannot, exist. > > --Mitchell Jones}*** > > > > >OTOH, watching the separated tail of a comet move around like a > >"Con-Trail" from a > >jet-liner gives an good > >indication of Solar Photon-Wind sweeping action. > > ***{Yes, but there is no "bubble." If at any distance from the sun the > photon repulsion of a gas molecule is greater than the gravitational > attraction, that will be the case at all distances. Thus the only way > molecules of the banned species can approach the sun is if they are > aggregated together in larger bodies. (Since the attractive gravitational > force on an object is proportional to the cube of its radius and the photon > repulsion is proportional to the square of its radius, the aggregation of > molecules into larger particles shifts the balance in favor of attraction.) > > The implication is that the sun isn't sweeping up any gases--or, at least, > any light gases. Instead, individual atoms and molecules in the space > surrounding the sun must aggregate into larger particles--e.g., crystals of > methane, ammonia, carbon dioxide, or water ice--before the balance can be > shifted in favor of attraction. Moreover, since the surfaces of such > aggregates are blasted away by photon pressure as the sun is approached, > they must be rather large to actually make it into the sun itself. > > Therefore in the region outside the planetary disc there must be a > mind-boggling accumulation of orbiting ice crystals, comets, and dust, due > simply to the sun's rejection of small objects that approach it. By > repelling the low-mass molecules, it ensures that they will eventually > aggregate together into larger objects--e.g., small comets--before they are > finally able to move into the inner solar system. > > Bottom line: if the pioneer anomaly is due to the effects of aether flow > outward along the planetary disc, as I have suggested, then there should be > a continuous movement of small comets into the planetary disc from the > regions above and below it. > > --Mitchell Jones}*** > > >Regards, Frederick > ________________ > Quote of the month: > > "Always strive to be accurate, even when it doesn't matter, so that you can > be accurate when it does matter." --Jude Acers > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 5 15:17:13 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id PAA14895; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 15:15:58 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 15:15:58 -0700 Message-ID: <002f01c0ee02$856c81c0$50181ad8 oemcomputer> From: "Bruce Meland" To: Cc: "Robin van Spaandonk" Subject: Re: Fwd: Candidate for universal gravitational glue Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 14:00:12 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Resent-Message-ID: <"MSiOj2.0.ee3.UeL7x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/42991 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: I guess what i have been hinting at is 2 wizzards that I am aware of(there is probably more) have already done it but it has taken 10 years of their time and money doing it and they can't get patents and have been threatened not to bring the technology to market. One is hole up in one of the larger islands in the Pacific and is looking for the right funder and is doing well using the technology to probe for underground precious metal stashes and has the protection of the island govt. The other is trying to find a similar type situation. The reason i am mentioning the situation at all is trying to find the right kind of funder that has international contacts and knowhow to bring to market. And suggestions of how they might proceed to save the planet so to speak for future generations in spite of this very dominant global energy cartel. Trust me they have broke the code. Bruce(Covering this type technology for 12 years) -----Original Message----- From: Robin van Spaandonk To: vortex-l eskimo.com Date: Monday, June 04, 2001 7:09 PM Subject: Re: Fwd: Candidate for universal gravitational glue >In reply to Bruce Meland's message of Mon, 4 Jun 2001 09:38:47 -0700: > >>After observing the energy generated from nutrino type particles, and >>perhaps magnetic fields of earth and stars if they are present here on earth >>in sufficient quanity(stars magnetic fields overlapping the earth), light >>particles from the sun seem insignificant. Other cosmic rays, such as mesons >>may also be involved. Bruce >Face it Bruce, until someone comes up with a real stand alone device >that pours out kWs, we aren't going to have a clue where the energy >comes from, if indeed it does. > > >Regards, > >Robin van Spaandonk > >A Future For Humanity see: http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ >New model hydrogen atom see http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/New-hydrogen.html > > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 5 15:36:58 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id PAA24539; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 15:35:31 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 15:35:31 -0700 From: Robin van Spaandonk To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Fusion Reactor Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2001 08:35:16 +1000 Organization: Improving Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id PAA24495 Resent-Message-ID: <"9tUY9.0.B_5.pwL7x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/42992 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: In reply to Hypercom59 aol.com's message of Tue, 5 Jun 2001 16:32:13 EDT: >Greeting to all list members, > >Thank you for allowing me to participate in this forum. [snip] Welcome Chris. :) Regards, Robin van Spaandonk A Future For Humanity see: http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ New model hydrogen atom see http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/New-hydrogen.html From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 5 15:37:03 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id PAA25630; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 15:36:25 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 15:36:25 -0700 Message-ID: <004c01c0ee05$61617d00$50181ad8 oemcomputer> From: "Bruce Meland" To: Cc: Subject: Re: Re[2]: Raids and helicopters prove nothing Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 14:20:41 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Resent-Message-ID: <"gk7011.0.IG6.exL7x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/42993 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Jed I amd not berating the cold fusion researchers accomplishments but if one has a solid state device that converts cosmic energy directly to electricity, it is a slam dunk and won't take years and millions of dollars for pilot plants. And besides this technology is of proper economy of scale that one need not have centralized power distribution and economic control. The technology is just too revolutionary and risks energy stock portfolios of the high and mighty. Just recently Judge Sandra OConor(sp?) could not rule on a energy case because she owned stock in the company. Also perhaps these divices operate at such high frequencies only black budget technology can detect their operation and hence exercise control measures.. Bruce- ----Original Message----- From: Jed Rothwell To: vortex-L eskimo.com Date: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 3:46 PM Subject: Re: Re[2]: Raids and helicopters prove nothing >I wrote: > >>I am assuming that the machine is real, and there are other people in the >>world who know that, and would be anxious to download the information. If >>the machine were not real, the government would not hear about it, or >>bother to raid the laboratory. They can't go after every fruitcake who >>claims over-unity or anti-gravity! > >That's a little confusing. What I mean is that the data would have to be >extremely compelling to attract attention from the government. The >government does not even believe CF. Manpower and resources would only be >allocated to suppress a claim with a high level of proof, or many credible >eyewitness accounts, or prototypes floating around. No government is large >enough to chase down every claim. > >We know for a fact that many people who make these claims have been at it >years without the slightest interference by the government. Some of them, >like Correa and Mills, have pretty good evidence, and others have >irrefutable evidence. If the black helicopter suppression brigades exist, >they are grossly incompetent, since they have left Mills, Mizuno and Storms >unmolested. I do not believe they are so smart they can be sure Storms or >Mizuno will never find a way to control the reaction and scale up. > >Data so compelling it convinces the government would also attract attention >from other governments, and corporations. If you put it on Internet or >started e-mailing it around, word would soon reach a larger audience than >the government could suppress. It would be like trying to erase all memory >of the "IT" scooter. > >The world does not work like a third rate thriller novel. Real suppression >of innovation by the government exists, naturally. But it is a tedious, >mundane everyday event, carried out by grey men wearing suits mumbling into >the microphones at physics conferences and congressional budget hearings. >It does not call for helicopters, guns, or midnight raids. There is no >drama. All it takes is paperwork and maybe a few phone calls to highly >placed opinionated newspaper reporters. > >- Jed > > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 5 16:03:14 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id QAA03838; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 16:02:34 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 16:02:34 -0700 Message-ID: <00b201c0ee0a$dd4d7ae0$8e8f85ce computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: Cc: References: <004301c0eda3$1f9fea80$8e8f85ce computer> <7mjqht0gor6bha721vu76cgl114f7rrpvq@4ax.com> Subject: Re: Ultraviolet Lamp Neutron Generator? Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 16:59:26 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Resent-Message-ID: <"Fw_Iq2.0.dx.4KM7x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/42994 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: ----- Original Message ----- From: "Robin van Spaandonk" To: Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 4:29 PM Subject: Re: Ultraviolet Lamp Neutron Generator? Robin wrote: > In reply to Frederick Sparber's message of Tue, 5 Jun 2001 04:36:06 > -0500: > [snip] > >The liberated neutrons can be used to fission Lithium 7 forming 2 He4 or Boron 10 > >forming He4 and Li7 concurrently releasing energy. > > > >I haven't the guts to try this. :-) > [snip] > I wouldn't worry too much Fred, Dr. Mills does his damnedest to create > hydrinos, and AFAIK has seen very little if any nuclear activity. I > think most of his shrunken particles escape before they shrink far > enough to do any "good". Has he used Deuterium? Stripping of Deuterons occurs at plasma temperatures as low as 0.5 eV. The UV lamp photon output goes up to 6.7 eV with most of the energy at 4.9 eV. And doesn't require Mills' "Physics". Regards, Frederick > > Regards, > > Robin van Spaandonk > > A Future For Humanity see: http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ > New model hydrogen atom see http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/New-hydrogen.html > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 5 19:01:04 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id SAA10966; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 18:58:35 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 18:58:35 -0700 From: Hypercom59 aol.com Message-ID: Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 21:58:22 EDT Subject: RE: Fusion Reactor To: vortex-L eskimo.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 5.0 for Windows sub 124 Resent-Message-ID: <"xSsdH1.0.Gh2.BvO7x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/42995 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Greeting to you also Robin, Regards, Chris Arnold For a Fusion powered future http://members.aol.com/hypercom59/index.html From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 5 20:21:13 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id UAA32063; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 20:20:12 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 20:20:12 -0700 From: Standing Bear To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Egad! No More Martians? Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 10:51:38 -0700 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.1.99] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" References: <000901c0eabc$31c35510$1f962640 bear> <01060312302600.01501@linux> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01060410513802.00884 linux> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id UAA32042 Resent-Message-ID: <"A4_Ug3.0.vq7.h5Q7x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/42996 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: On Sunday 03 June 2001 14:37, Rick Monteverde wrote: > Standing B. - > > >Hopefully that will not give you a headache. You > >know, those surfboards must hurt when you wipe out on > >a big wave and the old board just then has the perverse > >intelligence to come behing you and nail you right behind > >the ear. > > Dude, I only bodysurf on big waves. No (fiber)glass needed when I fly > through the big shiny transport tubes on *this* planet, dig? > > - Rick Monteverde > Honolulu, HI Gotcha dude! But then again I remember as a kid havin a friend that liked to play in electronics. Needed wire and it was expensive, so he hung around the back of the local telephone exchange in town. They were real buildings then and used vacuum tubes and stepper relays in their logic circuitry. They often threw away short pieces of multiconductor cable that he could use. Each length consisted of about 200 or so twisted pairs of multicolored wire covered by a multilayer sheath topped with a heavy layer of rubber or polyethylene. One of the sheathing materials was corrugated aluminum. If one removed this aluminum and half buried it in sand and played around a bit with a camera, one could come up with a pic just like that. But then some woman could do the same with the hose from a portable hair dryer. Incidentally, Duane was a real whiz in building those radios out of junk. Once he built a citizens band radio with about 10000 watts output that, according to him, garbled every television set in town. Standing Bear From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 5 21:25:35 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id VAA25938; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 21:22:53 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 21:22:53 -0700 From: Standing Bear To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Fw: KPFA Radio Report of ETs at Government Installations Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 00:27:08 -0700 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.1.99] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" References: <008e01c0edf2$70a98400$df181ad8 oemcomputer> In-Reply-To: <008e01c0edf2$70a98400$df181ad8 oemcomputer> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01060600270800.00884 linux> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id VAA25894 Resent-Message-ID: <"Nw5gS3.0.9L6.T0R7x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/42997 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: On Tuesday 05 June 2001 12:05, Bruce Meland wrote: > -----Original Message----- > From: Patrick Bailey > To: BCC: UFO_Send_List ; pgb@padrak.com (BCC: Special > Secret_Send List) > Date: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 11:59 AM > Subject: FWD: KPFA Radio Report of ETs at Government Installations > > > >FWD: KPFA Radio Report of ETs at Government Installations > > > >Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2001 21:16:43 -0700 > >From: drboylan > >To: ufotruth ,drrichboylanreports > > > >Subject: KPFA Radio Report of ETs at Government Installations > >X-Rcpt-To: pgb padrak.com > > > >Prefatory Message from Richard Boylan, Ph.D.: > > > >I heard this tape from KPFA-FM, Berkeley, and know the > >interviewer-producer, Ralph Steiner. Ralph is a professional > >journalist and man of integrty, and has paid dearly for bring these > >interviews to public attention by broasdcast. He was aided in the > >research by Michael Lindemann. > > > >The brave citizens whose testimony fills this electrifying tape merit > >our admiration and appreciation for their courage in coming forward > >during the height of the UFO Cover-Up (1991). > > > >I doubt that Mr. Steiner will make copies of the KPFA tape available, > >since he has been warned that the witnesses will be killed if it is > >aired again. But KPFA's Berkeley station contact phone number should > >be available from information at (510) 555-1212. > > > >FYI, Dr. Michael Wolf has corroborated the high-tech, > >electromagnetic, ET-containment field technology described by one of > >the contractors interviewed as being used at Haystack Air Force > >Laboratory deep under Haystack Buttes in east Edwards Air Force Base, > >near Lancaster, CA. > > > >- Richard Boylan, Ph.D. > > > >WITNESSES CLAIM THEY SAW ALIENS AT U.S. BASES > > > >By Elaine Douglass > > > >The U.S. government has a close working relationship with alien > >beings, three unnamed witnesses told a California radio station in a > >program aired in June. > > > >The four-hour program, produced and broadcast by KPFA-FM in Berkeley, > >Calif., ranged widely over the UFO topic, but the most explosive > >segments were the testimony of a construction contractor who said he > >saw aliens at Edwards Air Force Base and at the China Lake Naval > >Weapons facility in California; the testimony of a man who described > >"saucers" being launched from a Northrop facility near Edwards; and a > >woman's second-hand account of a meeting between aliens and U.S. > >military officers. > > > >Moreover, it now appears that KPFA's voice in the UFO area has been > silenced. > > > >Although in June the program producer Ralph Steiner promised > >additional coverage of the UFO issue in future broadcasts, inquires > >from the Forum were met with this blunt message from Mr. Steiner: "Do > >not re-broadcast the tape. Persons whose testimony is on the tape > >have been threatened and their lives are in danger." Subsequent > >inquiries from The Forum to Mr. Steiner have gone unanswered. > > > >The Forum has obtained a tape of the KPFA broadcast. What follows is > >a summary and excerpts from witness: > > > >No. 1. > > > >According to the KPFA broadcast, the interviews were conducted in > >April 1991 in communities surrounding Edwards Air Force Base in the > >Antelope Valley of Southern California. Witness No. 1 described > >himself as a Vietnam veteran, former Green Beret, military > >medal-holder, and a licensed general contractor who has worked on > >construction projects at Chuna Lake and at Nellis, Scott, Edwards, > >and Andrews Air Force Bases. The projects, the witness said, were > >"mostly underground." > > > >* Underground Structures, Alien Beings > > > >Each of these facilities has extensive underground installations, and > >they are "definitely not normal military structures," the witness > >said. He described 4-foot thick concrete walls and > >electronically-controlled oval-shaped doorways. "In one building I > >worked on at Edwards, called Haystack Buttes, [Haystack USAF > >Laboratory - R.Boylan] it took us over 5 minutes to get from the top > >to the bottom by elevator," the witness said. "We estimated it was 30 > >stories deep." It was here that the witness first saw an alien. "We > >were walking down a hall," the witness said, "and these doors opened > >and there was a very particular person or things that caught my eye > >for an instant. This man was over seven feet tall. I'd say between 8 > >and 9 to 10 feet, wearing a lab jacket and talking to two [human] > >engineers. > > > >"This man's arms were almost down to his knees! It threw me into > >shock," the witness said. "And then the doors closed. Security saw us > >and told us to get out of there. Next day I walked off the job," the > >witness said. > > > >Asked if the being he saw was a human, the witness replied, > >"Definitely not. He had big slanted eyes. A big head. Fingers were > >extremely long. Greenish skin." The witness said he saw the being for > >"just a couple of seconds. Three-quarters of its face is what I saw > >and I said, this guy would make a hell of a basketball player!" > > > >* One Witness Scared, the Other Dead > > > >The witness said his co-worker " 'bout died" when he too saw the > >being. The witness compared the height of the being to the height of > >the humans standing next to it. He said he knew one of the humans, > >whose height he estimated at 6 feet 6 inches. > > > >Witness No. 1 described a second encounter with aliens. He said he > >and co-workers saw "greys" at the China Lake [Naval Weapons Research > >Station, near Ridgecrest, CA - R Boylan] naval facility. > > > >"They [security] thought we had left--me and two other guys. But we > >decided to stay over and finish this job. We walked past a hangar and > >we could see through a window," the witness said. > > > >"One of the guys I was with, Paul, he saw them first. He said, 'Come > >here! Hurry up! I want to show you something!' And we looked in the > >window and there's these four little grey guys about 3 feet tall. > > > >"Right then, security saw us and they told us, 'We thought you guys > >left.' And they escorted us and said, 'You're not allowed around this > >hangar. This hangar is off- limits to everybody. You'll get yourself > >shot.' > > > >"And it messed with Paul's mind so much that every chance he got he > >snuck over there. He finally got caught and was kicked off the base. > >About three months later they found him mysteriously dead in Orange > >County. This kind of put a scare in me. I know why not to mess with > >something," the witness said. > > > >"After that I said, Ain't nobody pulling the blanket over my head any > >more. l know what's going on now. I know what I saw at Edwards is > >real. Somebody's playing games with us," the witness said. > > > >It should be noted that KPFA is one of five "Pacifica" stations, the > >first of which was founded in the late 1940s. The Pacifica stations, > >in New York, Berkeley, Los Angeles, Fresno, and Washington, D.C., are > >alternative, non- commercial and listener-sponsored, with a long > >tradition of political activism and precedent-making First Amendment > >struggles. > > > >++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > >Shared by: > >Richard J. Boylan, Ph.D., CCHT, LLC > >Post Office Box 22310 > >Sacramento, CA 95822, USA. > >(916) 422-7479 > >E-mail: drboylan jps.net > >URL: www.jps.net/drboylan > > > >You are invited to join his informational reports and conversations > >on-line list, UFOTruth by going to http://UFOTruth.listbot.com and > >clicking on the Subscribe button and following directions. > > > >You may instead wish to join his personal reports-only list (no > >conversations), DrRichBoylanReports by subscribing at: > >http://DrRichBoylanReports.listbot.com > > > > If we have actually seen, met, communicated with, and made working arrangements with these people, that makes me feel better about the universe. Now we all know: 1] We are not alone 2] There sentient neighbors to us somewhere 3] Einstein is full of crap somewhere in his theories or in their bypassability 4] We have a chance to fit into a stellar community somewhere 5] These aliens are willing and able to work with us Regarding the 'death threats'. Lots of military installations have areas where you can be shot if trespassing. I am sure that those bases had signs in the front regarding the various US Internal Security Acts and the consequences for their violation. Remember that spying is sometime a capital offense. In this case, the ramifications of the world knowing these facts, if that is what they and I hope that is true, would be truly great. For one thing, many of the 'inventions' of the last generation would make more sense considering the extremely elevated pace of new discoveries. It would be as if we were being guided in learning enabling technologies for further advances which then somehow appear as if arising out a hidden script. For another, Mr. Tarik Aziz, an Iraqi diplomat not given to hyperbole out of deference to keeping his body from being chopped into hamburger by certain members of Saadam's family, once made a claim that craft were seen on radar over Iraq with velocities over 9000 KPH, and coming from Coalition bases. My guess is that some of the 'Stealth' Fighters are special. Look at them. They are round. Think of form follows function, like a toilet. Round would be good. Think upper and lower 'NingLi' synth-gravity field generator coils. Implications of this would be negation of the inertia principle in between the coils inside the craft. Other implications would be a kind of shield effect from projectiles. If the field operates on space, expanding and contracting it at will, then the whatever will never arrive to damage the protected craft. Further, the craft could travel at any 'speed' desired within the limits of local suitability. Question is, what is our worth to our new friends? Certainly we do not have anything that they can't make or somehow get in the line of resources. Our services would be too low tech for them, but maybe not. Suppose that they are advanced in some areas and behind in others, such that a real give and take would be possible. The Betty and Barney Hill story tells of Laparoscopy before we had the ability. If true, it lends credence to the story on the one hand, and casts doubt on the well roundedness of the 'advanced' people who had the Hills as guests. We now use ultrasound, a less invasive procedure for these tests; are we to suppose that folks on another world were able to build starships but lacked in other technical areas like medical technology. Such is the pace of discovery. Suppose they had a brilliant scientist(s) who made these discoveries in some areas and not others. There are many of us, maybe we would be good for military service if adaptable enough. Suppose that we are already allies but dare not be too obtrusive. Our friends may have enemies too, and agents of those people may be here nosing around for evidence of just that arrangement. These are very serious speculations that we can make only because we do not really know so do not have to be held accountable. Anybody can guess. Given the availability of interstellar travel methods notwithstanding the obstructionism of Einstein religious desciples, it was rotten ripe time for us to be visited. After all, we have been blithely polluting the area with our EM broadcasting for over 100 years. Well long enough for someone's taxpayers to pay for scouting a way through space to here from wherever so that ships could then travel the route relatively safely. You see, I think that sentient civilizations will all basically operate the same way. People support governments that serve them and foster advancement in various ways. Who knows what kind of trade they may be interested in. Seeing as civilized societies are often deficient in biodiversity, ours may be more valuable than we realize. Who knows, some frog from Brazil may be able to cure a disease among people of Epsilon Eridani? On the other hand, if we cannot get along with people we can at least have children with; then what are we going to do when we have to get along with those who are very alien to us yet are about equal or somewhat better than us in intelligence. We will have to grow too! Standing Bear From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 5 21:31:12 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id VAA02661; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 21:28:47 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 21:28:47 -0700 From: Robin van Spaandonk To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Ultraviolet Lamp Neutron Generator? Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2001 14:28:39 +1000 Organization: Improving Message-ID: References: <004301c0eda3$1f9fea80$8e8f85ce computer> <7mjqht0gor6bha721vu76cgl114f7rrpvq@4ax.com> <00b201c0ee0a$dd4d7ae0$8e8f85ce@computer> In-Reply-To: <00b201c0ee0a$dd4d7ae0$8e8f85ce computer> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id VAA02635 Resent-Message-ID: <"3AFL51.0.Rf._5R7x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/42998 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: In reply to Frederick Sparber's message of Tue, 5 Jun 2001 16:59:26 -0500: [snip] >> I wouldn't worry too much Fred, Dr. Mills does his damnedest to create >> hydrinos, and AFAIK has seen very little if any nuclear activity. I >> think most of his shrunken particles escape before they shrink far >> enough to do any "good". > >Has he used Deuterium? Sorry, I don't know. However surely even the deuterium in normal hydrogen would present some signature? For that matter, you could try it with normal hydrogen and look for neutrons. If you got some, you could slowly increase the deuterium percentage. [snip] Regards, Robin van Spaandonk A Future For Humanity see: http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ New model hydrogen atom see http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/New-hydrogen.html From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Jun 6 06:01:06 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id GAA31660; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 06:00:22 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 06:00:22 -0700 Message-ID: <032701c0ee89$b6e40160$6a9b09ca eximcon> From: "eximcon" To: , Subject: Sputtering in Vacuum tubes Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 17:47:18 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Resent-Message-ID: <"gLnqy1.0.bk7.bbY7x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/42999 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: I manufacture vacuum discharge tubes with aluminium electrodes with high vacuum for use as cathode ray tubes, as also filled with various gases, after complete evacuation, but when worked with 4.5 or 6 kv 8 microamp currents, the sides of the tubes around electrodes get blackened probably due to sputtering. Could some one suggest how to prepare the aluminium electrodes, or process them or what else precautions to take while evacuating that sputtering does not occur. . Sanjeev From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Jun 6 07:54:19 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id HAA04964; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 07:52:40 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 07:52:40 -0700 Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2001 07:49:51 -0700 From: Jones Beene Subject: Re: Sputtering in Vacuum tubes To: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-to: jonesb9 pacbell.net Message-id: <0GEI003QRJXECZ mta5.snfc21.pbi.net> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Opera 5.11 build 904 Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Resent-Message-ID: <"_n3pt3.0.UD1.tEa7x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43000 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: >Could some one suggest how to prepare the aluminium electrodes, or process >them or what else precautions to take while evacuating that sputtering does >not occur. Greetings, It took commercial manufactures years to control this problem and I doubt that the numerous partial solutions which are available are easily implemented without significant engineering investment. There is some information to be found on the web at sites like Samuel Goldwasser's: Sam's F-Lamp FAQ : Fluorescent Lamps, Ballasts, and Fixtures http://www.misty.com/people/don/f-lamp.html. or do Google search using keywords like: fluorescent tube sputtering In general, sputtering is most severe during start up, and a fluorescent tube will only start a few thousand times before its electrodes fail. Going to electronically controlled startup ciruitry is a partially effective (but a costly) solution that can also significantly save energy as fluorescent tubes are far more efficient at certain higher frequencies (ion acoustic) than at 50 or 60 hz. The fixture itself is out of your control, of course, but there are some design features that can enter into the mix to control sputtering. Bare aluminum is not a good choice for electrodes as it sputters very easily, but it is cheap. It could probably be used as a substrate with proper heavy plating or anodizing. The structural shape is also important. I have noticed that some manufacturers are using a double wedge shaped electrode that is severely angled so that the sputtered electrode material is forced back into the ends where it is partially hidden by the end caps- which is an admission that the problem is as much cosmetic as practical (i.e. most manufactures think they are better off with a little "planned" obsolesence). BTW, are you doing any "free energy" experiments with custom fills? If so and you are interested in some ideas relating to the Mills hydrino, please let me know (you can post to me directly). Jones Beene From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Jun 6 08:58:33 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id IAA26554; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 08:55:58 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 08:55:58 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <000801c0edfd$70f6b8a0$50181ad8 oemcomputer> References: <000801c0edfd$70f6b8a0$50181ad8 oemcomputer> Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 10:55:26 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: thomas malloy Subject: Lindermann's book Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Resent-Message-ID: <"c5Gn63.0.hU6.DAb7x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43002 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: >The book is not too much on his intrepretation of key free energy systems >just some very basic and extensive information that Peter has spent many >years gathering about the Gray Motor Patents and experimentation and also >some similar on Tesla's radiant energy devices. You can save a lot of time You can also waste a lot of money and time by reading books of people who have done nothing but rehash what other inventors claim to have done. Paper and ink are cheap, but lets see the good doctor heat water. Every thing else is just rehash and speculation! > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Jun 6 08:58:36 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id IAA26369; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 08:55:25 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 08:55:25 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <004301c0eda3$1f9fea80$8e8f85ce computer> References: <004301c0eda3$1f9fea80$8e8f85ce computer> Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 10:55:26 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: thomas malloy Subject: Re: Ultraviolet Lamp Neutron Generator? Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Resent-Message-ID: <"i7nof1.0.xR6.j9b7x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43001 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: >The quartz glass germicidal UV lamps in standard fluorescent tube >configurations (4 >ft, 40 watt T12 or such) if surrounded by a Boron tube, spaced to >allow for an annular >volume filled with D2 at atmospheric pressure might act as a source >of neutrons >stripped from deuterons. Is the tube filled with D2 something that you are theorizing about, or something that is on the shelf? > >The 185 and 254 nanometer photons (~6.7 eV and 4.95 eV respectively) >will dissociate >the D2 to 2 D and possibly form a "Deuterino" which will dissociate >into a Neutron and a Proton. The liberated neutrons can be used to >fission Lithium 7 forming 2 He4 or Boron 10 forming He4 and Li7 >concurrently releasing energy. > >I haven't the guts to try this. :-) speaking about experiements that we don't have the guts to try, how about putting the tube in the vacinity of some natural uranium? > > >Regards, Frederick I don't blame you Fredrick, as I understand it there is no safe exposure to neutrons. Some one responded to my posting on The Farnsworth Fusor mentioning that it only produces 10 X 6 neutrons per second. That makes me think about lead underwear! BTW what would happen if someone developed an improved version of the Fusor that produced the requisite 10 X 12 neutrons per second? From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Jun 6 10:03:02 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id KAA24939; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 10:00:27 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 10:00:27 -0700 Message-ID: <010301c0eea1$75c712e0$8e8f85ce computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: Cc: Subject: Re: Photon Energy Storage in Water? Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 10:56:29 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Resent-Message-ID: <"jjXpu.0.X56.g6c7x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43003 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Based on the results obtained by the Japanese researchers on Photoreduction of water to H2 and O2 after the light source has been removed, it seems probable that the water molecules are storing photoenergy, then dumping it either in photolysis, electrolysis, or agitation of the water. A simple experiment would be placing a small light bulb in a Dewar and monitoring the temperature to see if there is a difference between the energy input and the temperature rise, which should indicate isothermal creation of metastable states in the molecule/molecules. This might also help explain the anomalous source of energy in hurricanes/cyclones (Wet Vortices)over water. Regards, Frederick From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Jun 6 11:04:29 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id KAA29973; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 10:16:55 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 10:16:55 -0700 Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20010606123738.02376740 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2001 13:16:28 -0400 To: vortex-l eskimo.com, From: Jed Rothwell Subject: Re: Re[2]: Raids and helicopters prove nothing In-Reply-To: <004c01c0ee05$61617d00$50181ad8 oemcomputer> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <"kKlZO3.0.BK7.7Mc7x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43004 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Bruce Meland wrote: > Jed I amd not berating the cold fusion researchers accomplishments but > if one has a solid state device that converts cosmic energy directly to > electricity, it is a slam dunk and won't take years and millions of > dollars for pilot plants. That's correct, I am sure. No one disputes that if you had such a device the rest would follow. However, as far as I know, nobody has such a device, it is physically impossible to make one. You have not given us any reason to believe such a machine exists. So there is no point in speculating about what it might do, or what it would be good for. If I had a machine that could convert lead into gold, or a machine that could predict the outcome of the Georgia Lottery, I would be fabulously rich, but I do not, and I am not, so why speculate about it? >The technology is just too revolutionary and risks energy stock >portfolios of the high and mighty. That's nonsense. Throughout history, countless revolutionary technologies have destroyed the stock portfolios of the high and mighty. The most recent example is the microcomputer, which nearly destroyed IBM, and which wiped out most mainframe and minicomputer companies. Starting in 1900, automobiles and later airplanes destroyed U.S. railroad passenger transport, even though the railroads were the most wealthy, politically powerful, influential, and most feared industry in the world. In 1900 upstart entrepreneurs like Henry Ford had far less legal protection against heavy handed, unfair competition than Bill Gates had in 1980, but it did not stop him from destroying the biggest industry on earth. If I had the technology you describe, I would soon be richer than Bill Gates, and nothing -- no corporation, government or Black Helicopters -- could stop me, except by killing me. > Just recently Judge Sandra OConor(sp?) >could not rule on a energy case because she owned stock in the company. The name is Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor. You can find that name with the correct spelling on the Internet in less than two seconds with a search program Google.com or www.alltheweb.com. Since you are the editor of Electrifying Times, I suggest you learn to use these search tools to pin down names and facts. >Also perhaps these divices operate at such high frequencies only black >budget technology can detect their operation and hence exercise control Black budget technology cannot prevent spies in the CIA and the FBI from selling out and betraying our agents and secret codes. Black budget agencies such the CIA are so inept they did not predict the fall of the Soviet Union, or make any arrangements for it. Their high-level million dollar analyses of Japanese politics, language and culture are a joke. These reports would be given a failing grade in undergraduate Asian Studies at any university in the world. They are as ridiculous as the portrayal of the Imperial Japanese Navy general staff in the movie "Pearl Harbor," which seems to be based on the wild fantasies of some 13-year-old kid, and which are played by people who cannot even speak Japanese. (For a reasonably accurate portrayal of the IJN, see the movie "Tora Tora Tora.") The U.S. Federal agencies are so ignorant of basic science, they do not even understand that cold fusion is real. The high level government people I have spoken with are so ignorant, they would not recognize a revolutionary technology if it bit them on the butt. There is not the slightest chance they have machines that can "detect" the "frequencies" of energy producing machine, and furthermore that statement has no scientific or technical meaning. It is nonsense, fantasy and blather. Frankly, all of your messages seem to be concocted of such blather, so I think I will add you to my short list of people who are automatically deleted. - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Jun 6 11:23:27 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id LAA21645; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 11:20:16 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 11:20:16 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Sender: mjones pop.jump.net Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <008701c0edff$742ca460$8e8f85ce computer> References: Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 13:18:13 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Mitchell Jones Subject: Re: Primordial Gas Cloud Resent-Message-ID: <"Y6V5W3.0.jH5.PHd7x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43005 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Fred Sparber wrote: >I think you missed the mark, Mr. Jones. ***{Who, me? :-) --MJ}*** >The gravitational force of the Sun on a water molecule at 5.0 AU is ~ >7.1E-30 newtons. >The force from a 2.5 eV photon on a water molecule is >~1.3E-27 newtons. Since (~ 80%) of the ~ 54 watts/meter^2 from the Sun at >is in the >infrared (~ 0.1 eV to ~1.7eV) the photon pressure CAN create a "Bubble" of >10 AU Diameter or less. ***{No.The "bubble" can only exist if three conditions are satisfied: (1) Within the bubble, the outward force due to photon pressure must be greater than the inward force due to gravity--which means: Fo > Fi. (2) At the surface of the bubble, Fo = Fi. (3) Outside the bubble, Fo < Fi. Unfortunately, as previously noted, both Fo and Fi vary inversely as the square of the radius. Result: they must, of necessity, have the same relationship to one another at all radii. Therefore the bubble cannot exist. --Mitchell Jones}*** >Go figure, and study up on the Heliopause. :-) ***{The balance of forces that defines the leading edge of the so-called "heliosphere" is not photon pressure vs. gravity, but photon pressure vs. the resistance of the primordial gas cloud. The sun is positioned 8500 parsecs (pc) from the center of the galaxy near the inside edge of the Orion spiral arm, about 8 pc north of the midplane, and is plowing through the cold interstellar gas cloud at about 220 km/sec. The so called "heliosphere" (which isn't spherical) is a hot ionized plasma that is thrown off by the sun under the influence of photon pressure. The "heliopause" is the bow shock region where the solar wind collides with the cold interstellar gas cloud. (See, for example, http://vraptor.jpl.nasa.gov/voyager/vgrhelio_pr.html.) Bottom line: the fact that a "bubble"cannot be defined by the opposition of photon pressure and gravity does not mean one cannot be defined by the opposition of photon pressure and the resistance of the interstellar medium. --Mitchell Jones}*** > >Regards, Frederick ________________ Quote of the month: "Always strive to be accurate, even when it doesn't matter, so that you can be accurate when it does matter." --Jude Acers From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Jun 6 11:29:40 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id LAA24200; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 11:26:07 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 11:26:07 -0700 Message-ID: <010901c0eead$6332cb40$8e8f85ce computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: Cc: References: <004301c0eda3$1f9fea80$8e8f85ce computer> Subject: Re: Ultraviolet Lamp Neutron Generator? Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 12:23:04 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Resent-Message-ID: <"YKpWN2.0.ev5.wMd7x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43006 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: ----- Original Message ----- From: "thomas malloy" To: Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 10:55 AM Subject: Re: Ultraviolet Lamp Neutron Generator? Thomas Malloy wrote: >Frederick Sparber wrote: > > >The quartz glass germicidal UV lamps in standard fluorescent tube > >configurations (4 > >ft, 40 watt T12 or such) if surrounded by a Boron tube, spaced to > >allow for an annular > >volume filled with D2 at atmospheric pressure might act as a source > >of neutrons > >stripped from deuterons. > > Is the tube filled with D2 something that you are theorizing about, > or something that is on the shelf? > The fluorescent type germicidal lamps are not filled with D2. It would be used to fill the annular volume around the lamp body. The germicidal tubes use a UV transparent glass or quartz, and are an off the shelf item from several fluorescent tube manufacturers at around $30.00 each. The 4 foot 40 watt T-12 (1.5 inch O.D.) units will work with a standard single tube ballast fixture. > > > >The 185 and 254 nanometer photons (~6.7 eV and 4.95 eV respectively) > >will dissociate > >the D2 to 2 D and possibly form a "Deuterino" which will dissociate > >into a Neutron and a Proton. The liberated neutrons can be used to > >fission Lithium 7 forming 2 He4 or Boron 10 forming He4 and Li7 > >concurrently releasing energy. > > > >I haven't the guts to try this. :-) > > speaking about experiements that we don't have the guts to try, how > about putting the tube in the vacinity of some natural uranium? You want to use it as a Geiger Counter? :-) > > > > > >Regards, Frederick > > > I don't blame you Fredrick, as I understand it there is no safe > exposure to neutrons. > > Some one responded to my posting on The Farnsworth Fusor mentioning > that it only produces 10 X 6 neutrons per second. That makes me think > about lead underwear! Lead doesn't do that much good in stopping neutrons (even thermal ones). You would be better off with Borax soaked underwear. >BTW what would happen if someone developed an > improved version of the Fusor that produced the requisite 10 X 12 > neutrons per second? That is the intent. Use UV photons to create the Neutron Stripping of the Deuterons with the plasma confined in the fluorescent tube and the D2 (or D2O with dissolved Boron compounds in it) so that the Proton End of the Deuteron forms a "hydrino" or such and the Neutron end becomes unbound,i.e., a thermal neutron that can fission the Boron 10 to He4 + Li7 + ~3.7 Mev. Regards, Frederick > > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Jun 6 11:41:52 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id LAA31089; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 11:39:38 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 11:39:38 -0700 Message-ID: <002201c0eead$71657000$5d181ad8 oemcomputer> From: "Bruce Meland" To: Subject: Re: Lindermann's book Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 10:23:44 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Resent-Message-ID: <"Yq5gL3.0.Nb7.bZd7x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43007 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: But it takes skill to descipher the nitty gritty I have looked at it and it has some key info for the serious inventor. some peoples skills are digging out info yet revealed. He is one. Again you can waste years doing ones own thing when maybe someone has already done it. -----Original Message----- From: thomas malloy To: vortex-l eskimo.com Date: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 8:59 AM Subject: Lindermann's book >>The book is not too much on his intrepretation of key free energy systems >>just some very basic and extensive information that Peter has spent many >>years gathering about the Gray Motor Patents and experimentation and also >>some similar on Tesla's radiant energy devices. You can save a lot of time > >You can also waste a lot of money and time by reading books of people >who have done nothing but rehash what other inventors claim to have >done. > >Paper and ink are cheap, but lets see the good doctor heat water. >Every thing else is just rehash and speculation! > >> > > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Jun 6 12:27:12 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id MAA17479; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 12:24:40 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 12:24:40 -0700 Reply-To: From: "Keith Nagel" To: "Vortex" Subject: A parable for Bruce Meland Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 15:30:33 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Importance: Normal Resent-Message-ID: <"wp_Zi2.0.xG4.tDe7x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43008 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Hi All. Many moons ago, I had the experience of working with a Born Again Christian. You know the type. Anyway, he kept trying to convert the heathens in the office to the one true faith. One day, the following exchange took place. Bob: "Blah Blah accept Jesus blah blah going to hell etc etc" Me: "Bob, do you mean to say that if I don't accept jesus I'm going to hell" Bob : "Yes!" Me: "OK. What about if I never heard of Jesus. Do I automatically go to hell?" Bob: "uhhh, I suppose so yes" Me: "Hmm... What about babys, buddhists, etc." Bob: "uhmmmmmmm yeah" Me: "Damn Bob, that seems pretty cruel. Babies?" Bob: long pause...furrowed brow "OK, what happens is they go to limbo and get judged on individual merit" Me: "So, basically, what you're trying to do is maximize the number of souls going to heaven, hence the prosteletizing?" Bob: "Yup" Me: "So if you succeed in convincing me, I go to heaven" Bob: sensing victory "Yes!" Me: "and if you fail, if your oratory skills are insufficient or your logic is unappealing, or I feel bad 'cause my girlfriend fought with me, and I don't accept this, I go to hell" Bob: "Uhmm Yeah." Me: "That's a lot of responsibility Bob. I may live a good life, but because of your inability to argue a point, to present any factual data to back up your claim, I'm damned to hell. Just for hearing you" Bob: Blinks. Me: "So it would seem, that the best way to maximize the number of good souls in heaven, is to keep this a great secret. Don't tell anyone. Then, we'll be judged on merit and not on your ability to argue, which frankly is greatly lacking. Bob: Mouth opens. Me: "Already you've damned half the department to an eternity of torment. Please stop." From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Jun 6 14:34:11 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id OAA03141; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 14:31:54 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 14:31:54 -0700 Message-ID: <003101c0eec5$8786cba0$c4181ad8 oemcomputer> From: "Bruce Meland" To: , "Vortex" Subject: Re: A parable for Bruce Meland Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 13:16:09 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Resent-Message-ID: <"9lWIO2.0.um.A5g7x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43009 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Keith you are the one that is nieve and probably some low level technician that is living in the past or with very regimented classic electrodynamics perceptions. I just happen to get around and have been networking with real inventors, not stuck in some little shop or garage cranking out printed circuit boards or the stuck in corner of some establishment corp. shop. This technology has nothing to do with religion or a parable. Just some wizzard inventors, one with a PHD in EE and good at origional work and not the regurgitaor type that ends up at some University. One of the wizzards was key developer of fiber optics. Keith you just have blinders on! Bruce From: Keith Nagel To: Vortex Date: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 12:27 PM Subject: A parable for Bruce Meland >Hi All. > >Many moons ago, I had the experience of working with a Born >Again Christian. You know the type. Anyway, he kept trying >to convert the heathens in the office to the one true faith. >One day, the following exchange took place. > >Bob: "Blah Blah accept Jesus blah blah going to hell etc etc" > >Me: "Bob, do you mean to say that if I don't accept jesus I'm going to hell" > >Bob : "Yes!" > >Me: "OK. What about if I never heard of Jesus. Do I automatically go to >hell?" > >Bob: "uhhh, I suppose so yes" > >Me: "Hmm... What about babys, buddhists, etc." > >Bob: "uhmmmmmmm yeah" > >Me: "Damn Bob, that seems pretty cruel. Babies?" > >Bob: long pause...furrowed brow "OK, what happens is they go to limbo and >get judged > on individual merit" > >Me: "So, basically, what you're trying to do is maximize the number of souls > going to heaven, hence the prosteletizing?" > >Bob: "Yup" > >Me: "So if you succeed in convincing me, I go to heaven" > >Bob: sensing victory "Yes!" > >Me: "and if you fail, if your oratory skills are insufficient or your > logic is unappealing, or I feel bad 'cause my girlfriend fought > with me, and I don't accept this, I go to hell" > >Bob: "Uhmm Yeah." > >Me: "That's a lot of responsibility Bob. I may live a good life, but because > of your inability to argue a point, to present any factual data > to back up your claim, I'm damned to hell. Just for hearing you" > >Bob: Blinks. > >Me: "So it would seem, that the best way to maximize the number of good > souls in heaven, is to keep this a great secret. Don't tell anyone. > Then, we'll be judged on merit and not on your ability to argue, > which frankly is greatly lacking. > >Bob: Mouth opens. > >Me: "Already you've damned half the department to an eternity of torment. > Please stop." > > > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Jun 6 14:36:24 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id OAA05032; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 14:35:00 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 14:35:00 -0700 Message-ID: <003801c0eec5$f6eeff80$c4181ad8 oemcomputer> From: "Bruce Meland" To: "Jim Uban" Cc: Subject: Re: per vortex postings subjects Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 13:19:15 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Resent-Message-ID: <"Qfal53.0.IE1.38g7x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43010 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Jim UFO's have a lot to do with advanced electrodynamics, overunity and anti gravity. Sure sometimes you have to read between the lines a little. Broaden your horizons a little please Bruce -----Original Message----- From: Jim Uban To: etimes teleport.com Date: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 3:13 PM Subject: per vortex postings subjects >Hi Bruce, > Vortex list is not really for discussing >UFO's, etc. It is supposed to be for serious >researching of various scientific topics. I know >the list drifts, but please take UFO reports >elsewhere! Tnx, Jim > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Jun 6 15:09:07 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id PAA24357; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 15:08:13 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 15:08:13 -0700 Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2001 15:05:59 -0700 From: Jones Beene Subject: AquaFuel - Unclear on the concept To: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-to: jonesb9 pacbell.net Message-id: <0GEJ003J844DUE mta6.snfc21.pbi.net> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Opera 5.11 build 904 Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Resent-Message-ID: <"0q1zY3.0.Oy5.Bdg7x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43011 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Vortexians, Some months ago, following a glowing write-up in "Infinite Energy," many of the supporters of alternative fuels were excited about the apparently very quick commercialization of AquaFuel. The company touted it, now and then, as a "non-fossil" alternative to fossil fuels, even though its developers knew from the beginning that a large percentage of the caloric value of the fuel would be coming indirectly from coal - by some estimates far over 100 % when you consider that the electricity used is coming from coal-fired generators and the carbon electrodes are derived from coal and the process is far less efficient than first claimed. In fact burning a pound of this "non-fossil" alternative might indirectly require as much as five pounds of mined coal. AquaLux Corp. and some of its developers came into the field with credentials and reputations that were, if not above reproach, let us say... on a par with some of their alternative fuel predecessors, such as Yull Brown. The last time I checked, coal was considered to be a fossil fuel but that oversight may be the least of this company's problems. It has been now disclosed by Mike Brassfield in a copyrighted St. Petersburg Times story, published May 23, 2001 that a large explosion at the new company's site is causing serious concern among its Florida neighbors. No one was hurt, only because the incident occurred after hours, but the explosion rattled neighbors' nerves after a 100-pound cylinder containing AquaFuel exploded at the 5 acre site. The company says a faulty storage tank, not its fuel, was to blame for the explosion. "It's a non-combustible fuel," a company spokesman said. "It's a great fuel. It's environmentally friendly." The company's Web site describes the mixture of hydrogen, oxygen, and numerous unknown mixed hydrocarbons as a clean, synthetic, non-combustible alternative to fossil fuels. These guys need a quick course in organic chemistry... or should I say, honesty. It meets none of these puffed up claims - plus it goes a little beyond "spin doctoring" to blame an explosion of volatile hydrocarbons, MIXED AND STORED WITH AN OXIDIZER, on a storage tank. Who do they think they are kidding? OSHA? the St. Petersburg Police? Investors? I hope this isn't just one more in the long, sad list of free energy scams. But if you ask the neighbors, it is certainly beginning to look that way. Regards, Jones Beene From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Jun 6 15:40:31 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id PAA03812; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 15:39:47 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 15:39:47 -0700 Message-ID: <002d01c0eed9$92052ae0$a4290404 hppav> From: "Jeff & Dorothy Kooistra" To: References: Subject: Re: Fusion Reactor Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 18:39:37 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 Resent-Message-ID: <"tv94k1.0.Qx.o4h7x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43012 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Chris, > Fusion and Richard Hull. Even though I have never met Richard, I respect him > and his relentless pursuit of Farnsworth's gifts to us all. Without Dr. Hull > - Farnsworth might not even be a memory. I have met Richard Hull (it isn't Dr. Hull, BTW) and he is a real wizard of Tesla tech--I visited him because I wanted to see his magnifying coil in action--now that was sort of like how Moses must have felt before the burning bush. At any rate, Hull is the consummate Teslaniac. However, he would not have been pursuing the Farnsworth tech (at least, not as soon as he started) if he hadn't been lucky enough to meet my friend Tom Ligon, who showed him his own homebuilt device. Richard "ran with it" faster than anything after that. kooistra From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Jun 6 17:02:44 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id RAA04747; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 17:02:02 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 17:02:02 -0700 Message-ID: <017901c0eedc$5c032660$8e8f85ce computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: Cc: References: <0GEJ003J844DUE mta6.snfc21.pbi.net> Subject: Re: AquaFuel - Unclear on the concept Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 17:59:31 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Resent-Message-ID: <"G6yxH.0.5A1.wHi7x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43013 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jones Beene" To: Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 5:05 PM Subject: AquaFuel - Unclear on the concept Hi Jones. A very perceptive treatment of using biomass carbon plus fossil fuel carbon, to inefficiently create a fuel gas that can be obtained (pipeline ready)using biomass gasifiers at higher efficiency, higher throughput rate, and at a fraction of the equipment cost. Regards, Frederick > Vortexians, > > Some months ago, following a glowing write-up in "Infinite Energy," many of > the supporters of alternative fuels were excited about the apparently very quick > commercialization of AquaFuel. The company touted it, now and then, as a > "non-fossil" alternative to fossil fuels, even though its developers knew from the > beginning that a large percentage of the caloric value of the fuel would be > coming indirectly from coal - by some estimates far over 100 % when you > consider that the electricity used is coming from coal-fired generators and the > carbon electrodes are derived from coal and the process is far less efficient > than first claimed. In fact burning a pound of this "non-fossil" alternative might > indirectly require as much as five pounds of mined coal. AquaLux Corp. and > some of its developers came into the field with credentials and reputations that > were, if not above reproach, let us say... on a par with some of their alternative > fuel predecessors, such as Yull Brown. > > The last time I checked, coal was considered to be a fossil fuel but that > oversight may be the least of this company's problems. > > It has been now disclosed by Mike Brassfield in a copyrighted St. Petersburg > Times story, published May 23, 2001 that a large explosion at the new > company's site is causing serious concern among its Florida neighbors. No one > was hurt, only because the incident occurred after hours, but the explosion > rattled neighbors' nerves after a 100-pound cylinder containing AquaFuel > exploded at the 5 acre site. > > The company says a faulty storage tank, not its fuel, was to blame for the > explosion. "It's a non-combustible fuel," a company spokesman said. "It's a > great fuel. It's environmentally friendly." > > The company's Web site describes the mixture of hydrogen, oxygen, and > numerous unknown mixed hydrocarbons as a clean, synthetic, non-combustible > alternative to fossil fuels. These guys need a quick course in organic chemistry... > or should I say, honesty. It meets none of these puffed up claims - plus it goes a > little beyond "spin doctoring" to blame an explosion of volatile hydrocarbons, > MIXED AND STORED WITH AN OXIDIZER, on a storage tank. Who do > they think they are kidding? OSHA? the St. Petersburg Police? Investors? > > I hope this isn't just one more in the long, sad list of free energy scams. But if > you ask the neighbors, it is certainly beginning to look that way. > > Regards, > > Jones Beene > > > > > > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Jun 6 18:20:58 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id SAA31051; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 18:19:11 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 18:19:11 -0700 Message-ID: <019601c0eee7$211eda20$8e8f85ce computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: Cc: Subject: Re: Aquafuel or this? Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 19:16:26 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000A_01C0EEBD.2EC27760" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Resent-Message-ID: <"A5ZYZ2.0.0b7.DQj7x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43014 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_000A_01C0EEBD.2EC27760 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sorry Jones, I forgot the thread title. :-( http://www.arbre.co.uk/continue.htm ------=_NextPart_000_000A_01C0EEBD.2EC27760 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="ARBRE - Clean Energy for the Future.url" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="ARBRE - Clean Energy for the Future.url" [DEFAULT] BASEURL=http://www.arbre.co.uk/continue.htm [InternetShortcut] URL=http://www.arbre.co.uk/continue.htm Modified=E0116BC9E6EEC001BA ------=_NextPart_000_000A_01C0EEBD.2EC27760-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Jun 6 18:43:41 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id SAA05013; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 18:41:28 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 18:41:28 -0700 Message-ID: <019b01c0eeea$404b2b80$8e8f85ce computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: Cc: Subject: Re: Aquafuel sometrhing Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 19:38:54 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0012_01C0EEC0.51FDE860" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Resent-Message-ID: <"8hd9J1.0.FE1.8lj7x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43015 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0012_01C0EEC0.51FDE860 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lets see Aquafuel get the electrical power capacity to run 200 tons of biomass/day through their "Arc Gasifier". :-) http://nepa.eh.doe.gov/ea/ea1078/ea_1078.html Regards, Frederick ------=_NextPart_000_0012_01C0EEC0.51FDE860 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="EA1078; Biomass Gasification Demonstration Project, Burlington, Vermont June 1995.url" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="EA1078; Biomass Gasification Demonstration Project, Burlington, Vermont June 1995.url" [DEFAULT] BASEURL=http://nepa.eh.doe.gov/ea/ea1078/ea_1078.html [InternetShortcut] URL=http://nepa.eh.doe.gov/ea/ea1078/ea_1078.html Modified=C0F9F19FE9EEC001E1 ------=_NextPart_000_0012_01C0EEC0.51FDE860-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Jun 6 21:28:21 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id VAA25075; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 21:25:17 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 21:25:17 -0700 From: Robin van Spaandonk To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: AquaFuel - Unclear on the concept Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2001 14:23:53 +1000 Organization: Improving Message-ID: <6b0uht0cd7ngelddrivg407j5hrlsn488m 4ax.com> References: <0GEJ003J844DUE mta6.snfc21.pbi.net> In-Reply-To: <0GEJ003J844DUE mta6.snfc21.pbi.net> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id VAA24990 Resent-Message-ID: <"6F_Z73.0.b76.j8m7x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43016 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: In reply to Jones Beene's message of Wed, 06 Jun 2001 15:05:59 -0700: [snip] >The company says a faulty storage tank, not its fuel, was to blame for the >explosion. "It's a non-combustible fuel," a company spokesman said. "It's a ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ This would seem to be a contradiction in terms. [snip] BTW Jones, you also appear to have filled in your "reply to" field. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk A Future For Humanity see: http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ New model hydrogen atom see http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/New-hydrogen.html From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Jun 6 22:01:30 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id WAA08234; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 22:00:05 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 22:00:05 -0700 Reply-To: From: "Keith Nagel" To: "Bruce Meland" Cc: "Vortex" Subject: RE: A parable for Bruce Meland Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 01:05:54 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 In-Reply-To: <003101c0eec5$8786cba0$c4181ad8 oemcomputer> Importance: Normal Resent-Message-ID: <"khF0Z2.0.a02.Kfm7x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43017 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Well Bruce, are you ready to provide us with some factual information about the increasing bizarre claims you've been making on vortex? Or more black helicopters, disappearing prototypes, mystery inventors... Jed pointed out the reality of suppression, but I'd like to add one more point. Disinformation can be spread about a subject to the point where it becomes impossible for any intelligent dialog to occur. I used to think such actions were orchestrated, but now feel it's an organic process. Perhaps an expression of Freud's Thanatos? Instead of making a lot of specious assumptions about me and the rest of the list members, how about some real information or discussion? K. -----Original Message----- From: Bruce Meland [mailto:etimes teleport.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 4:16 PM To: knagel gis.net; Vortex Subject: Re: A parable for Bruce Meland Keith you are the one that is nieve and probably some low level technician that is living in the past or with very regimented classic electrodynamics perceptions. I just happen to get around and have been networking with real inventors, not stuck in some little shop or garage cranking out printed circuit boards or the stuck in corner of some establishment corp. shop. This technology has nothing to do with religion or a parable. Just some wizzard inventors, one with a PHD in EE and good at origional work and not the regurgitaor type that ends up at some University. One of the wizzards was key developer of fiber optics. Keith you just have blinders on! Bruce From: Keith Nagel To: Vortex Date: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 12:27 PM Subject: A parable for Bruce Meland >Hi All. > >Many moons ago, I had the experience of working with a Born >Again Christian. You know the type. Anyway, he kept trying >to convert the heathens in the office to the one true faith. >One day, the following exchange took place. > >Bob: "Blah Blah accept Jesus blah blah going to hell etc etc" > >Me: "Bob, do you mean to say that if I don't accept jesus I'm going to hell" > >Bob : "Yes!" > >Me: "OK. What about if I never heard of Jesus. Do I automatically go to >hell?" > >Bob: "uhhh, I suppose so yes" > >Me: "Hmm... What about babys, buddhists, etc." > >Bob: "uhmmmmmmm yeah" > >Me: "Damn Bob, that seems pretty cruel. Babies?" > >Bob: long pause...furrowed brow "OK, what happens is they go to limbo and >get judged > on individual merit" > >Me: "So, basically, what you're trying to do is maximize the number of souls > going to heaven, hence the prosteletizing?" > >Bob: "Yup" > >Me: "So if you succeed in convincing me, I go to heaven" > >Bob: sensing victory "Yes!" > >Me: "and if you fail, if your oratory skills are insufficient or your > logic is unappealing, or I feel bad 'cause my girlfriend fought > with me, and I don't accept this, I go to hell" > >Bob: "Uhmm Yeah." > >Me: "That's a lot of responsibility Bob. I may live a good life, but because > of your inability to argue a point, to present any factual data > to back up your claim, I'm damned to hell. Just for hearing you" > >Bob: Blinks. > >Me: "So it would seem, that the best way to maximize the number of good > souls in heaven, is to keep this a great secret. Don't tell anyone. > Then, we'll be judged on merit and not on your ability to argue, > which frankly is greatly lacking. > >Bob: Mouth opens. > >Me: "Already you've damned half the department to an eternity of torment. > Please stop." > > > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Jun 6 22:19:58 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id WAA13661; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 22:17:15 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 22:17:15 -0700 Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2001 22:20:54 -0700 From: Lynn Kurtz Subject: Re[2]: A parable for Bruce Meland In-reply-to: <003101c0eec5$8786cba0$c4181ad8 oemcomputer> To: Bruce Meland Reply-to: Lynn Kurtz Message-id: <4422483369.20010606222054 imap2.asu.edu> Organization: ASU MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.44) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) References: <003101c0eec5$8786cba0$c4181ad8 oemcomputer> Resent-Message-ID: <"IOXvW1.0.LL3.Rvm7x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43018 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: On Wednesday, June 06, 2001 you wrote BM> Keith you are the one that is nieve and probably some low level BM> technician that is living in the past I gather this is supposed to be an insult to Keith. Have you tried looking up "nieve" in the dictionary? Illiterate insults just don't cut it. BM> or with very regimented classic electrodynamics perceptions. You certainly wouldn't want to have anything to do with "classical" electrodynamics. Go with the new age stuff. BM> I just happen to get around and have been networking with real BM> inventors, not stuck in some little shop or garage cranking out BM> printed circuit boards or the stuck in corner of some BM> establishment corp. shop. Oh, yes! REAL inventors. Unlike those in the ESTABLISHMENT shops, who of course wouldn't know what they are doing. BM> This technology has nothing to do with religion or a parable. I suppose you are correct. It's more like Science Fiction (apologies to any Science Fiction fans who might be offended by that opinion). BM> Just some wizzard inventors, one with a PHD in EE and good at BM> origional work and not the regurgitaor type that ends up at some BM> University. Naturally, nobody at a university would be good at original work. They can't think for themselves. Where did your miracle inventor get his Ph.D.? And I can't find "wizzard", "origional", or "regurgitaor" in my dictionary either. BM> One of the wizzards was key developer of fiber optics. Keith you BM> just have blinders on! Better to have blinders on than to have your head up your ass. --Lynn From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Jun 6 23:12:56 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id XAA30370; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 23:09:35 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 23:09:35 -0700 Message-ID: <3B1F1AA2.4CB3328B verisoft.com.tr> Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2001 09:09:38 +0300 From: hamdi ucar X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en-US MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex Subject: (physics/0106020) One of Possible Applications of High-Tc Superconductors Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"CHDoj1.0.CQ7.Qgn7x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43019 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/physics/0106020 From: Nikulov Alexey Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 08:29:28 GMT (9kb) One of Possible Applications of High-Tc Superconductors Possible application of a result contradicting to the second law of thermodynamics is announced. According to this result the chaotic energy of thermal fluctuation can be transformed in electric energy of direct current in an inhomogeneous superconducting ring. Although the power of this transformation is very weak this effect has optimistic perspective of wide application because useful energy can be obtained from heat energy in the equilibrium state. It is explain why the second law can be broken in some quantum systems. In the last years some authors have concluded almost at once on violation of the second law in different quantum systems: A.E.Allahverdyan and Th.M.Nieuwenhuizen, PRL 85, 1799 (2000); cond-mat/0011389; V.Capec and J.Bok Czech. J. of Phys. 49, 1645 (1999); cond-mat/0012056; Physica A 290, 379 (2001); D. Sheehan, Phys. Plasmas 2 (6), 1893 (1995); Phys. Rev.E 61, 4662 (2000); P. Weiss, Science News, 158, 234 (2000). Regards, hamdi ucar From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Jun 6 23:42:47 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id XAA06947; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 23:41:47 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 23:41:47 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <5.0.2.1.2.20010606123738.02376740 pop.mindspring.com> References: <5.0.2.1.2.20010606123738.02376740 pop.mindspring.com> Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 01:42:14 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: thomas malloy Subject: Jed's caustic ascessments Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Resent-Message-ID: <"nbeqZ3.0.Ri1.e8o7x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43020 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: >Their high-level million dollar analyses of Japanese politics, >language and culture are a joke. These reports would be given a >failing grade in undergraduate Asian Studies at any university in >the world. what a caustic acessment of the intelligence community! >They are as ridiculous as the portrayal of the Imperial Japanese >Navy general staff in the movie "Pearl Harbor," which seems to be >based on the wild fantasies of some 13-year-old kid, and which are >played by people who cannot even speak Japanese. What else would one expect from the Queermouseco (Disney)? > (For a reasonably accurate portrayal of the IJN, see the movie >"Tora Tora Tora.") > >The U.S. Federal agencies are so ignorant of basic science, they do >not even understand that cold fusion is real. The BEPRP paper seems to indicate that they have caught on to C F being real >The high level government people I have spoken with are so ignorant, >they would not recognize a revolutionary technology if it bit them >on the butt. OH that's caustic! >There is not the slightest chance they have machines that can >"detect" the "frequencies" of energy producing machine, and >furthermore that statement has no scientific or technical meaning. >It is nonsense, fantasy and blather. An even more caustic ascessment of Meland! >Frankly, all of your messages seem to be concocted of such blather, >so I think I will add you to my short list of people who are >automatically deleted. Blather, that's a word that's not in my dictionary, does it mean something like BS? > >- Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Jun 7 00:35:34 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id AAA16724; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 00:34:54 -0700 Resent-Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 00:34:54 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: rick mail.highsurf.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: <5.0.2.1.2.20010606123738.02376740 pop.mindspring.com> Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 21:15:46 -1000 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Rick Monteverde Subject: Re: Jed's caustic ascessments Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Resent-Message-ID: <"gJ48f1.0.C54.Swo7x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43021 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Thomas - > Blather, that's a word that's not in my dictionary, > does it mean something like BS? Right, and neither is "gullible". I know, I looked. ;) Ok, can we all put down our spelling police badges for a while? - Rick Monnavertie Honoruru, HI From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Jun 7 01:37:45 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id BAA29509; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 01:37:01 -0700 Resent-Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 01:37:01 -0700 Message-ID: <01e701c0ef24$4e32ff40$8e8f85ce computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: Cc: Subject: Re[2]: A parable for Bruce Meland Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 02:34:31 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Resent-Message-ID: <"dBsr4.0.xC7.iqp7x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43022 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: ROFL! I just love Vortex during a Full Moon! :-) Regards, Frederick From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Jun 7 03:38:39 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id DAA19607; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 03:37:54 -0700 Resent-Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 03:37:54 -0700 Message-ID: <01f301c0ef35$2ff71140$8e8f85ce computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: Cc: Subject: Re: Remediation of wastes with surplus neutrons? Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 04:35:14 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000A_01C0EF0B.3EC747A0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Resent-Message-ID: <"uYxpA2.0.Ho4.2cr7x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43023 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_000A_01C0EF0B.3EC747A0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit If you use the 1.5 to 2.0 "surplus" neutrons of each fission reaction in new fuel rods to clean up the rad wastes in the spent fuel rods....:-) http://www.ccnr.org/fission_ana.html Regards, Frederick ------=_NextPart_000_000A_01C0EF0B.3EC747A0 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="Nuclear Fission Using Uranium-235.url" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="Nuclear Fission Using Uranium-235.url" [DEFAULT] BASEURL=http://www.ccnr.org/fission_ana.html [InternetShortcut] URL=http://www.ccnr.org/fission_ana.html Modified=80AB4B2F34EFC00189 ------=_NextPart_000_000A_01C0EF0B.3EC747A0-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Jun 7 07:23:57 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id HAA10004; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 07:21:36 -0700 Resent-Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 07:21:36 -0700 Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20010607095009.00a8f848 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2001 10:21:21 -0400 To: vortex-L eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: Re: Jed's caustic ascessments In-Reply-To: References: <5.0.2.1.2.20010606123738.02376740 pop.mindspring.com> <5.0.2.1.2.20010606123738.02376740 pop.mindspring.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id HAA09972 Resent-Message-ID: <"Yw_9h2.0.AS2.ltu7x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43024 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: thomas malloy wrote: >>Their high-level million dollar analyses of Japanese politics, language >>and culture are a joke. These reports would be given a failing grade in >>undergraduate Asian Studies at any university in the world. > >what a caustic acessment of the intelligence community! It is based on a notorious CIA sponsored report published in 1991, titled "Japan 2000." This was paid for by the CIA but written by someone at the Rochester Institute of Technology. It claimed, among other things, that the Sino-Japanese war was in 1905 and Hitler rose to power in 1939. Other CIA, NSA and Army documents are more accurate. But the overall standard is low. An old joke has it you can learn more from the New York Times than the CIA. Unfortunately, that is true, despite the $35 billion the government spends on intelligence. >>The U.S. Federal agencies are so ignorant of basic science, they do not >>even understand that cold fusion is real. > >The BEPRP paper seems to indicate that they have caught on to C F being real Naturally some people, in some parts of the government, are aware that CF is real. >>The high level government people I have spoken with are so ignorant, they >>would not recognize a revolutionary technology if it bit them on the butt. > >OH that's caustic! But true, alas. When I catch myself on the phone trying to explain to some guy in the energy department the difference between chemical and nuclear energy, I realize this is a lost cause. Profound ignorance goes right to the top. Secretary of Energy Abraham thinks the Internet consumes "8 - 13%" of electricity. Many high level decision makers at major corporations are just as clueless. After all, they are not investing in CF either. The problem isn't government or industry, capitalism or socialism -- it is human nature. Read newspapers, books or eyewitness accounts from any era in history and you will find incompetent people in high places making terrible mistakes. The best and brightest brought us the War in Vietnam, the Three Mile Island meltdown, tulipmania, dot-com mania, polywater and countless other embarrassing lessons mankind hastens to forget. >Blather, that's a word that's not in my dictionary, does it mean something >like BS? American Heritage: blath·er (blàth¹er) also bleth·er (blèth¹-) verb, intransitive blath·ered, blath·er·ing, blath·ers To talk nonsensically. noun Nonsensical talk. [Old Norse bladhra.] - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Jun 7 08:00:06 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id HAA26322; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 07:59:31 -0700 Resent-Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 07:59:31 -0700 Message-ID: <002301c0ef63$fbb33380$8192cbc1 pc> From: "Noel Whitney" To: References: <0GEJ003J844DUE mta6.snfc21.pbi.net> <6b0uht0cd7ngelddrivg407j5hrlsn488m@4ax.com> Subject: Re: AquaFuel - Unclear on the concept Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 16:10:25 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 Resent-Message-ID: <"X71Q3.0.2R6.IRv7x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43025 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Robin - We investigated this concept and while it had some good envior. benefits when we did the costings and they worked out at 20 times the cost of Diesel we put it away rapidly, its a Carbon Arc under water system.and is quite definately a "Combustable fuel" :-) as our Alsatian Dog can confirm as we set off a 2 ltr Pepsi bottle of it with Jettex fuse :-) ----- Original Message ----- From: Robin van Spaandonk To: Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 5:23 AM Subject: Re: AquaFuel - Unclear on the concept > In reply to Jones Beene's message of Wed, 06 Jun 2001 15:05:59 -0700: > [snip] > >The company says a faulty storage tank, not its fuel, was to blame for the > >explosion. "It's a non-combustible fuel," a company spokesman said. "It's a > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > This would seem to be a contradiction in terms. > [snip] > BTW Jones, you also appear to have filled in your "reply to" field. > > > Regards, > > Robin van Spaandonk > > A Future For Humanity see: http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ > New model hydrogen atom see http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/New-hydrogen.html > > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Jun 7 09:58:52 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id JAA14127; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 09:57:52 -0700 Resent-Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 09:57:52 -0700 Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2001 09:53:34 -0700 From: Jones Beene Subject: Re: Fusion Reactor To: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-to: jonesb9 pacbell.net Message-id: <0GEK00FQXKBN95 mta6.snfc21.pbi.net> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Opera 5.11 build 904 Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Resent-Message-ID: <"zQzke2.0.US3.FAx7x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43026 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Jeff Kooistra wrote: >....my friend Tom Ligon, who showed him his own homebuilt device. Richard >"ran with it" faster than anything after that. Tom Ligon's machine graced the cover of IE last year (issue 30) and his article was one of the most interesting to appear there in some time. At the end he mentioned Dr. Bussard and the p-B11 IEC concept as being the key to a fusion future. I hope that Richard Hull (or maybe Chris Arnold or any fusorite) will try that fueling scheme sometime. Just to get a taste for and report the parameters, if nothing else. Despite his extreme competence with this technology niche, Richard does seems surprisingly reluctant (at least in his comments on the Fusor forum) to actually taking that "last step" into the unknown that will push the technology out of the Farnsworth era. Or if he does tinker privately, he doesn't talk about it publicly. If D+D fusion is truly a "dead-end street" for actual power production, as Miley believes (and it goes without saying that our government will never allow easy access to tritium) then p-B11 is really the only remaining option to get the Fusor out of the Lab. Yes, the cross section for p-B11 seems out of reach at this particular moment in time, BUT remember, before Philo came on the scene, every physicist out there was pooh-poohing the idea that deuterium fusion would occur at anything less than the megavolt level, much less 10 kilovolts. Lo and behold, Philo tries it and and then the embarrassed "experts" grunt and look the other way, admitting no wrong, " well, it's only Boltzman's tail" (and we have to protect our billion $ boondoggles). One reason that p-B11 might very well succeed eventually, is that IF room temperature superconductivity (RTSC) does ever hit the mainstream then the whole ball game changes. In my opinion RTSC will be that one great "enabling technology," not only for p-B11 but for LENR but many other things as well. RTSC may have the same catalytic effect, historically, as the integrated circuit has had in its field, i.e. it spawned a multitude of unforeseeable advances, each building on the others. How such a new technological revolution might transpire is not at all self- evident. So consider this - there is a glimmer of hope (some would say the strong possibility) that the boron reaction will become self-heating when magnetically contained. And yes, you can take that one step further and postulate that eventually p-B11 will "chain react" in the limited sense that all you need to do to keep the reaction going, once ignited, is to keep adding fuel. This is made possible because, unlike DD or DT, you don't loose the better part of your energy gain to neutrons which can't be contained in the plasma. Therefore the fusion "ash (alpha particles)" of p-B11, when magnetically bottled, will return enough of their energy gain back into the plasma so that voila, you've got fusion that doesn't extinguish and doesn't require continuous massive energy input, even though it may be a real chore to startup. Of course, the cynic might say, warm superconductivity is here now, so prove it. Or why didn't they try it in a Tokamak. Well, despite what you hear in the media, no reliable superconducting technology is affordable by anyone less than a national laboratory (or maybe Bill Gates) and containment will require magnets of 5 T or so. But basically, the overriding problem is that the big fusion projects have sucked the funding well dry for this kind of effort, as Bussard was complaining about for years. And the tokamak is NOT a convergence device, so it can't benefit from the "energy multiplication" advantages of convergence devices like the IEC. Nor does anyone know for sure if IEC can really be combined with magnetics. Nor do tokamaks have enough startup power to ignite p-B11. It is ironic that in p-B11 there is a disadvantage to "going big." For the first time in nuclear technology, smaller may actually be better (up to a point). For instance, you don't really care that your startup igniter (which could be a RTSC free electron laser) needs to be a million times too large and inefficient for continuous use, because - duh - you don't use it continuously. It is amazing to me how few "big fusion" guys really get the point - "bigger is better" must be so ingrained into their psyche that they just can't shed the notion that p-B11 is not just an advanced fuel but a true paradgm shift on every level. BTW, does anyone have an update on any of the p-B11 IEC reactor schemes out there? One could venture that this is the technology which has Miley's attention right now. Since his financial success with the D+D Fusor and the very shaky nature of those patents, set against the prior work of Dr Bussard, maybe he may has decided to go "underground" with his research. Unfortunately, however, I think any of the current efforts underway with p-B11 will have to await the advent of RTSC, or something very close (magnesium di- boride is probably not quite enough), in order to reach fruition. I just hope someone hangs in there. Regards, Jones Beene From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Jun 7 12:17:02 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id MAA04142; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 12:15:48 -0700 Resent-Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 12:15:48 -0700 Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20010607151138.00a8f848 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2001 15:15:40 -0400 To: vortex-L eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: CA energy crisis subsides Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id MAA04077 Resent-Message-ID: <"vsl543.0.e01.ZBz7x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43027 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Consumption of electricity in California is 11% lower than it was in May, 2000. The state is backing off from negotiations for long term power contracts. I predict that in a year or two there will be a major glut in electricity. See: URL: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2001/06/07/MN177308.DTL Power switch -- contracts now in limbo Nosedive in electricity prices will let state deal from strength David Lazarus, Chronicle Staff Writer Thursday, June 7, 2001 ©2001 San Francisco Chronicle LEAD IN: Emboldened by an unexpected plunge in electricity prices, state officials said yesterday that they are prepared to press their advantage and walk away from nearly two dozen long-term power contracts that now are at above-market rates. This represents a complete reversal from the state's position of just a few weeks ago, when officials were at the mercy of power companies and were all but begging for any available megawatts. . . . - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Jun 7 14:09:03 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id OAA20074; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 14:05:47 -0700 Resent-Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 14:05:47 -0700 From: Hypercom59 aol.com Message-ID: <7a.1607b4c5.28514685 aol.com> Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 17:05:09 EDT Subject: Tritium banned and Deuterium regulated To: vortex-l eskimo.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 5.0 for Windows sub 124 Resent-Message-ID: <"Gf7E72.0.Sv4.go-7x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43028 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Jones wrote, The Government has already stopped the flow of tritium into the USA and Canada and just try to get deuterium from a supply house without certification that you are school or qualified lab. They will sell it to private citizens. Best Regards, Chris From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Jun 7 15:56:52 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id PAA32178; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 15:55:20 -0700 Resent-Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 15:55:20 -0700 Message-ID: <025601c0ef9c$33b042e0$8e8f85ce computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: References: <7a.1607b4c5.28514685 aol.com> Subject: Re: Tritium banned and Deuterium regulated Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 16:52:47 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Resent-Message-ID: <"35Orc2.0.ds7.NP08x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43029 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 4:05 PM Subject: Tritium banned and Deuterium regulated Chris: Hypercom wrote: > Jones wrote, > Miley > believes (and it goes without saying that our government will never allow > easy > access to tritium) then p-B11 is really the only remaining option to get the > Fusor out of the Lab.> p-Li7 ---> 2 He4 + 17.6 Mev should be easier except for handling. You can get LiH from Li and H2. Not much if any Li6 around since it is used to make Tritium: neutron + Li6 ---> Tritium + He4 + energy Cockcroft and Walton bombarded Boron with protons and got reactions in 1926. But not enough yield to be interesting from a fusion standpoint. > > The Government has already stopped the flow of tritium into the USA and > Canada and just try to get deuterium from a supply house without > certification that you are school or qualified lab. They will sell it to > private citizens. Do you mean will Not sell it to private citizens? Probably the same for D2O? Of course D2O can be electrolyzed to 2 D2 + O2. Regards, Frederick > > Best Regards, > Chris > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Jun 7 16:03:36 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id QAA02144; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 16:01:36 -0700 Resent-Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 16:01:36 -0700 From: Hypercom59 aol.com Message-ID: Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 19:01:26 EDT Subject: Tritium banned and Deuterium regulated To: vortex-l eskimo.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 5.0 for Windows sub 124 Resent-Message-ID: <"J3Be8.0.EX.EV08x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43030 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Chris said Correction, I meant to say, "They will NOT sell it to private citizens" but someone is selling it on "Ebay" - at least for now. Best Regards, Chris From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Jun 7 16:34:19 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id QAA14849; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 16:29:42 -0700 Resent-Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 16:29:42 -0700 Reply-To: From: "Keith Nagel" To: Subject: RE: Tritium banned and Deuterium regulated Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 19:35:32 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <025601c0ef9c$33b042e0$8e8f85ce computer> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Importance: Normal Resent-Message-ID: <"HOCIR.0.nd3.av08x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43031 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Hi Fred and Chris. I remember buying D2O a few years ago, no problem. But I had an account with Aldrich at the time, basically most chem houses won't sell ANYTHING to an individual, too many liability issues. Gone are the days of the Gilbert Chemistry Set....(frown). Also, I was AMAZED that I could buy all kinds of dangerous explosive material with no problem, but some VERY INNOCUOUS chemicals were prohibited by our old friends, the DEA. I was doing electrochemical experiments, and needed some anhydrous acetone. "NO SIR", sez Aldrich. I say, "Hell man, I can go down to the hardware store and buy this stuff, what are you talking about? How about you just sell me some of these drying beads?" Aldrich sez, "YES SIR". (sound of forehead being slapped). Seems like Uncle Sam is a lot more interested in keeping it's citizens from getting high than from blowing up big buildings. Anyone care to speculate on the reasons for this (smile)? I mention this because I noticed Fred referred to LiH, which I believe is a DEA watched chemical. Just having such stuff around is a crime, so watch it kids. Lest you court a visit from the real black helicopter/faceless goon squad. No Joke. By the way, I'm sure you've seen this article, but it's just so vortexian that I can't resist posting a link to it. Check it. http://www.dangerouslaboratories.org/radscout.html K. -----Original Message----- From: Frederick Sparber [mailto:fjsparber earthlink.net] Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 5:53 PM To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Tritium banned and Deuterium regulated ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 4:05 PM Subject: Tritium banned and Deuterium regulated Chris: Hypercom wrote: > Jones wrote, > Miley > believes (and it goes without saying that our government will never allow > easy > access to tritium) then p-B11 is really the only remaining option to get the > Fusor out of the Lab.> p-Li7 ---> 2 He4 + 17.6 Mev should be easier except for handling. You can get LiH from Li and H2. Not much if any Li6 around since it is used to make Tritium: neutron + Li6 ---> Tritium + He4 + energy Cockcroft and Walton bombarded Boron with protons and got reactions in 1926. But not enough yield to be interesting from a fusion standpoint. > > The Government has already stopped the flow of tritium into the USA and > Canada and just try to get deuterium from a supply house without > certification that you are school or qualified lab. They will sell it to > private citizens. Do you mean will Not sell it to private citizens? Probably the same for D2O? Of course D2O can be electrolyzed to 2 D2 + O2. Regards, Frederick > > Best Regards, > Chris > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Jun 7 18:45:21 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id SAA28214; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 18:44:27 -0700 Resent-Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 18:44:27 -0700 Message-Id: <5.0.0.25.0.20010607203737.020dbb30 pop.infi-net.mindspring.com> X-Sender: stk pop.infi-net.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0 Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2001 20:45:44 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: "Kyle R. Mcallister" Subject: OFF TOPIC Re: A parable for Bruce Meland In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <"HnCdg3.0.fu6.xt28x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43032 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: >Many moons ago, I had the experience of working with a Born >Again Christian. You know the type. Anyway, he kept trying >to convert the heathens in the office to the one true faith. >One day, the following exchange took place. I do not plan to disclose my religious preference, if any. I doubt I share it with many in this world anyways. However, being a person who has seen his fair share of racial, religious, etc. type bashing, and who has been guilty of such in the past (it was stupid of me, luckily I am more mature than that now), I do take offense at this. And since you can post your rather caustic viewpoint, I can post mine. Ok? "You know the type". No, I don't. I know many Christians. Some are very kind and understanding to others, and are the finest people I could know. Some are quick to condemn and bash anyone who does not follow their particular world view, even if it has nothing to do with their particular faith (choices in music, etc.). So, simply profiling based on religious preference is a bit stupid. The exchange you posted is an interesting work in human behavior, but in no way should be construed as a reference to what all Christians are like. Maybe you are an atheist, agnostic, buddhist, or something else. I don't know. And frankly it is none of my business anyways, because you are free to practice whatever religious preference (or lack thereof). However, if you can condemn people of some religious affiliation, then you are both profiling and acting in such a way to alienate those who are of that preference. What if there is a great nuclear physicist who happens to be a Christian or Hindu or Jew? I am betting if he gave you the privilege to talk to him, you'd watch your words more carefully. Not a flame. --Kyle From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Jun 7 19:56:00 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id TAA20267; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 19:55:09 -0700 Resent-Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 19:55:09 -0700 X-Apparently-From: Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.20010607215520.0098c3c0 postoffice.swbell.net> X-Sender: cjford1 pop.mail.yahoo.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58 Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2001 21:57:58 -0500 To: freenrg-l eskimo.com From: Charles Ford Subject: Re: [FG]: WHERE IS BILL B Cc: vortex-l eskimo.com In-Reply-To: <200106071558.f57Fwpk11028 lsmls01.we.mediaone.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <"TVPAe2.0.Ny4.Cw38x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43033 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: The man flat missing... Could someone in the Seattle aria check into this. It is becoming a matter of concern. At 08:59 AM 6/7/01 -0800, you wrote: >Eskimo probably charges his credit card automatically, so even >if Bill got sucked into another dimension during an experiment >this list could go on for quite some time..... > > >Heh - this list needs paying for ($3) on a monthly basis or eskimo.com > will terminate it. Where is he? > > > > > >Get 250 color business cards for FREE! > >http://businesscards.lycos.com/vp/fastpath/ _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Jun 8 04:01:27 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id DAA18990; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 03:58:47 -0700 Resent-Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 03:58:47 -0700 Message-ID: <002201c0efff$74f9c9c0$e2b4bfa8 computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: Cc: Subject: Re: Primordial Gas Cloud & Spacecraft Drag Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 04:41:45 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Resent-Message-ID: <"O5lh91.0.Ze4.d_A8x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43034 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Well Mitchell, I guess we can surmise that orbital decay of spacecraft is caused either by ether drag, or a less than perfect vacuum in low earth orbit. At 10^-15 Torr there are still ~ 27 Billion atoms/molecules (or space dust particles) per cubic meter. If they are predominantly water molecules then the mass per AU with 27 Billion H2O Molecules/meter^3 is: 18*1.66 x 10^-27*27 x 10^9*1.5 x 10^11 = 1.2 x 10^-4 kg/meter^2. A spacecraft clicking along at ~12,000 meters/second and colliding with those molecules/particles (moving around at less than ~100 meters/second in cold space) is bound to slow down some, whether it ices up or not. No? Regards, Frederick From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Jun 8 07:07:38 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id HAA07252; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 07:06:24 -0700 Resent-Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 07:06:24 -0700 Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20010608100525.00a93148 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2001 10:06:21 -0400 To: vortex-l eskimo.com, vortex-l@eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: Re: Tritium banned and Deuterium regulated In-Reply-To: <7a.1607b4c5.28514685 aol.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <"XTYRt1.0.Dn1.WlD8x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43035 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Hypercom59 aol.com wrote: >The Government has already stopped the flow of tritium into the USA and >Canada and just try to get deuterium from a supply house without >certification that you are school or qualified lab. They will sell it to >private citizens. I presume this means "not sell." That's incorrect. We have had no trouble buying D2 gas and D2O. - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Jun 8 08:10:45 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id IAA27674; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 08:07:34 -0700 Resent-Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 08:07:34 -0700 Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20010608110516.02928378 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2001 11:07:25 -0400 To: vortex-L eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: Depressing comments in Chemistry magazine Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <"DH13V3.0.Jm6.reE8x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43036 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Melvin Miles faxed me an article from the anniversary issue of Chemistry, by Lynn Teo Simarski. It includes many false claims about cold fusion, such as: "Plenty of bizarre discoveries have evoked incredulous T. and even laughter. Revelations of spectacular claims like cold fusion and polywater eventually discredited, lineup beside such discoveries as buckballs and superconductivity, which looked incredible to some scientists at first but later turned out to be true." . . . "Does the exposure of baseless claims like cold fusion and polywater reveal underlying flaws in the scientific process?" Miles wrote to the editor twice but he received no response. Attached is his first letter. Perhaps it would help of other scientists contacted the editor, although I doubt it. - Jed - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Letters To The Editor (chemistry ACS.org) Your recent anniversary issue (pages 42-49) contained an article by Lynn Teo Simarski titled "Eureka or Oops?" that requires a few comments. The cold fusion claims in 1989 were obviously overstated for an effect that proved to be difficult to reproduce. However, the main weapon used against cold fusion has been ridicule - and this is not part of the scientific method. My work has shown a reproducible excess heat effect for a palladium-boron material prepared by Dr. M.A. Imam of the Naval Research Laboratory (NRL), Washington D.C. This is documented in a recent report, "Calorimetric Analysis of a Heavy Water Experiment Using a Pd-B Alloy Cathode" authored by Drs. M. Fleischmann, M.A. Imam and myself (NRL/MR/6320-01-8526, March 26, 2001). My challenge for all critics of cold fusion is to use the scientific method and either accept the results of this report or clearly identify the scientific errors that invalidate this claim of an anomalous excess enthalpy effect. The actual raw experimental data is available in this detailed report (155 pages). For those scientists who desire a more accurate version of the cold fusion story, I recommend "Excess Heat: Why Cold Fusion Research Prevailed", Oak Grove Press, 2000 by Charles G. Beaudette. Dr. Melvin H. Miles Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division Code 4T4220D China Lake, CA 93555 From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Jun 8 08:20:05 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id IAA31436; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 08:18:27 -0700 Resent-Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 08:18:27 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Sender: mjones pop.jump.net Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <002201c0efff$74f9c9c0$e2b4bfa8 computer> Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 10:14:17 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Mitchell Jones Subject: Re: Primordial Gas Cloud & Spacecraft Drag Resent-Message-ID: <"tofZc3.0.6h7.2pE8x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43037 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: >Well Mitchell, I guess we can surmise that orbital decay of spacecraft is >caused >either by ether drag, or a less than perfect vacuum in low earth orbit. ***{I believe that the aether is entrained within the region where Earth's gravity is dominant and rotates with Earth--with slippage and interchange at the outer edges, of course. I see Earth as permeable to the aether, and, as a result, the rotation of Earth creates the effect of a centrifugal pump: aether is sucked in near the poles and hurled outward near the equator, after which it circulates either up or down, enters through the poles again, and so on. If this flow pattern were strong enough, it would produce an observable differential rotation pattern in Earth's atmosphere, such that the atmosphere would rotate more slowly at higher altitudes, and more slowly nearer to the poles. However, Earth is a small planet, close to the sun, and its atmosphere is thinner than that of the sun, Jupiter, and Saturn, where differential rotation has actually been observed, and so I do not know whether differential rotation is detectible here. (Variations in solar heating dominate the atmospheric circulation on Uranus, due to the extreme tilt of its axis--which is presently pointing almost directly at the sun. Thus the hottest spot is at the north pole, the coldest is at the south pole, and atmospheric flow at high altitudes is from north to south. Result: the Coriolis force obscures the tendency towards differential rotation. As for Neptune, very little information is available about circulation within its atmosphere.) Regarding aether drag on a spacecraft, since the pool of entrained aether rotates with Earth, a satellite in a prograde orbit would be very unlikely to experience measurable drag from that source. Thus, for practical purposes, orbital decay in near-Earth orbit is caused by the less-than-perfect vacuum which exists within the region where Earth's gravity is dominant. (Note: Earth's magnetic field acts as a shield against the solar wind.) --MJ}*** >At 10^-15 Torr there are still ~ 27 Billion atoms/molecules (or space dust >particles) >per cubic meter. ***{Earth's atmosphere extends throughout the region where its gravitational field is dominant. I have a book around here somewhere that gives a formula for calculating atmospheric density as a function of altitude--*Dynamic Meteorology* by Holton, if memory serves. Unfortunately, it's buried in the pile, and I can't put my hands on it at the moment. (My motto: "Have a place for everything, and everything in that place. :-) --MJ}*** >If they are predominantly water molecules then the mass per AU with 27 >Billion H2O >Molecules/meter^3 is: > >18*1.66 x 10^-27*27 x 10^9*1.5 x 10^11 = 1.2 x 10^-4 kg/meter^2. > >A spacecraft clicking along at ~12,000 meters/second and colliding with those >molecules/particles (moving around at less than ~100 meters/second in cold >space) is >bound to slow down some, whether it ices up or not. No? ***{Agreed. But not enough to account for the Pioneer anomaly, since the guys at JPL tried to take that into account. --MJ}*** >Regards, Frederick ________________ Quote of the month: "Always strive to be accurate, even when it doesn't matter, so that you can be accurate when it does matter." --Jude Acers From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Jun 8 08:54:48 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id IAA12270; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 08:54:03 -0700 Resent-Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 08:54:03 -0700 From: Hypercom59 aol.com Message-ID: Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 11:53:50 EDT Subject: Tritium banned and Deuterium regulated To: vortex-l eskimo.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 5.0 for Windows sub 124 Resent-Message-ID: <"VtFpe3.0.Z_2.QKF8x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43038 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Jed, In my second post I attempted to correct the "Omission" of "NOT," but I was not successful -- sorry for all the aggravation that has caused. The NRC has banned the import of tritium into the USA, period. You can't get it through normal channels. As for deuterium, all the chem. houses I called would not sell it to me, either as D2 or D2O, except for one place that needed all my information for NRC approval or some such approval nonsense. Jed, please provide the house that supplies you - either on the list or private - so I can get stock up too. If you have a few little vials of tritium I would be interested in that too. Best Regards, Chris From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Jun 8 11:33:15 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id LAA14201; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 11:30:30 -0700 Resent-Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 11:30:30 -0700 Message-ID: <005101c0f040$57a6db60$e2b4bfa8 computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: Subject: NASA Hyper-X Program Demonstrates Scramjet Technologies Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 12:27:40 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0012_01C0F016.68D35140" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Resent-Message-ID: <"FYLoM1.0.WT3.2dH8x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43039 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0012_01C0F016.68D35140 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I want one of these. http://oea.larc.nasa.gov/PAIS/Hyper-X.html ------=_NextPart_000_0012_01C0F016.68D35140 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="NASA Hyper-X Program Demonstrates Scramjet Technologies.url" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="NASA Hyper-X Program Demonstrates Scramjet Technologies.url" [DEFAULT] BASEURL=http://oea.larc.nasa.gov/PAIS/Hyper-X.html [InternetShortcut] URL=http://oea.larc.nasa.gov/PAIS/Hyper-X.html Modified=60241D2A40F0C001BC ------=_NextPart_000_0012_01C0F016.68D35140-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Jun 8 11:48:07 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id LAA21321; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 11:46:26 -0700 Resent-Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 11:46:26 -0700 Message-ID: <3B211067.3A96C8E1 ix.netcom.com> Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2001 11:51:00 -0600 From: Edmund Storms X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 (Macintosh; U; PPC) X-Accept-Language: en,pdf MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Depressing comments in Chemistry magazine References: <5.0.2.1.2.20010608110516.02928378 pop.mindspring.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"mkS693.0.3D5.2sH8x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43040 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Jed, I also saw this article and sent an e-mail message to the editor. I received no reply. It is amazing how ignorance just keeps multiplying. Imagine how many other "facts" we are caused to believe because we have no way of checking them. Ed Ed Jed Rothwell wrote: > Melvin Miles faxed me an article from the anniversary issue of Chemistry, > by Lynn Teo Simarski. It includes many false claims about cold fusion, such > as: "Plenty of bizarre discoveries have evoked incredulous T. and even > laughter. Revelations of spectacular claims like cold fusion and polywater > eventually discredited, lineup beside such discoveries as buckballs and > superconductivity, which looked incredible to some scientists at first but > later turned out to be true." . . . "Does the exposure of baseless claims > like cold fusion and polywater reveal underlying flaws in the scientific > process?" > > Miles wrote to the editor twice but he received no response. Attached is > his first letter. Perhaps it would help of other scientists contacted the > editor, although I doubt it. > > - Jed > > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > > Letters To The Editor (chemistry ACS.org) > > Your recent anniversary issue (pages 42-49) contained an article by Lynn > Teo Simarski titled "Eureka or Oops?" that requires a few comments. The > cold fusion claims in 1989 were obviously overstated for an effect that > proved to be difficult to reproduce. However, the main weapon used against > cold fusion has been ridicule - and this is not part of the scientific > method. My work has shown a reproducible excess heat effect for a > palladium-boron material prepared by Dr. M.A. Imam of the Naval Research > Laboratory (NRL), Washington D.C. This is documented in a recent report, > "Calorimetric Analysis of a Heavy Water Experiment Using a Pd-B Alloy > Cathode" authored by Drs. M. Fleischmann, M.A. Imam and myself > (NRL/MR/6320-01-8526, March 26, 2001). > > My challenge for all critics of cold fusion is to use the scientific method > and either accept the results of this report or clearly identify the > scientific errors that invalidate this claim of an anomalous excess > enthalpy effect. The actual raw experimental data is available in this > detailed report (155 pages). > > For those scientists who desire a more accurate version of the cold fusion > story, I recommend "Excess Heat: Why Cold Fusion Research Prevailed", Oak > Grove Press, 2000 by Charles G. Beaudette. > > Dr. Melvin H. Miles > Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division > Code 4T4220D > China Lake, CA 93555 From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Jun 8 12:05:49 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id MAA27655; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 12:02:53 -0700 Resent-Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 12:02:53 -0700 Reply-To: From: "Keith Nagel" To: Subject: RE: NASA Hyper-X Program Demonstrates Scramjet Technologies Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 15:08:42 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 In-Reply-To: <005101c0f040$57a6db60$e2b4bfa8 computer> Importance: Normal Resent-Message-ID: <"KDa-i3.0.fl6.Q5I8x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43041 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Hmmm, they seem to have the same problem as those old Chevy Malibu's... http://www.cnn.com/2001/TECH/space/06/06/in.brief/#2 I'm waiting till they get the bugs out before ordering mine. K. -----Original Message----- From: Frederick Sparber [mailto:fjsparber earthlink.net] Sent: Friday, June 08, 2001 1:28 PM To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: NASA Hyper-X Program Demonstrates Scramjet Technologies I want one of these. http://oea.larc.nasa.gov/PAIS/Hyper-X.html From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Jun 8 13:07:56 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id NAA28111; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 13:06:36 -0700 Resent-Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 13:06:36 -0700 Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20010608152845.00a93148 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2001 16:03:05 -0400 To: vortex-l eskimo.com, vortex-l@eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: Re: Depressing comments in Chemistry magazine In-Reply-To: <3B211067.3A96C8E1 ix.netcom.com> References: <5.0.2.1.2.20010608110516.02928378 pop.mindspring.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <"5OW232.0.1t6.A1J8x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43042 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Edmund Storms wrote: >Jed, I also saw this article and sent an e-mail message to the editor. I >received no reply. It is astounding that the editor does not even reply, or offer a chance to publish a rebuttal. That is a serious violation of academic ethics. > It is amazing how ignorance just keeps multiplying. I don't find this aspect of it amazing. Suppression of dissent is the same mechanism that multiplied ignorance in the past. People did not understand the cause and cure for ignorance, just as they did not understand bacteria. What is amazing is that a modern journal editor would be as ignorant as common people were in 1700. >Imagine how many other "facts" we are caused to believe because we have no >way of checking them. It is even worse, in a sense. The person looking to debunk aviation in 1905 would have to go to a university library and search through back issues of the Scientific American and other misinformed sources. You had to do a lot of work to find the wrong answer. Nowadays you go to the Internet and in a few seconds you are swamped by a barrage of newspaper articles and academic papers -- all of them dead wrong. The speed and ease with which misinformation falls into your lap gives the wrong impression. You feel it must be right because you have checked several major scientific journals, the Scientific American, the DoE, the APS in a half hour, and they all agree. The power of the Internet as a misinformation vector resembles its role as a computer virus vector, and it resembles way airplanes and trucks rapidly spread new diseases like AIDS. - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Jun 8 13:48:58 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id NAA11234; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 13:46:20 -0700 Resent-Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 13:46:20 -0700 Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20010608164132.02948678 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2001 16:46:11 -0400 To: vortex-l eskimo.com, vortex-l@eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: Re: Tritium banned and Deuterium regulated In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <"oMXiQ2.0.Ql2.RcJ8x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43043 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Chris asked: >Jed, please provide the house that supplies you - either on the list or >private - so I can get stock up too. If you have a few little vials of >tritium I would be interested in that too. Ken says Alpha Aesar and Cole Parmer sell D2O without a hitch. He doesn't know where we got D2 gas. You can always make it yourself from D2O. I can understand why tritium sales are restricted, but there should be a way around the limitations. Why not talk to a local university, and see if they can get you some? - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Jun 8 15:24:29 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id PAA11894; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 15:19:25 -0700 Resent-Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 15:19:25 -0700 Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20010608173552.02982b20 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2001 18:18:08 -0400 To: vortex-L eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: Many of mistakes in this paper. Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <"m_Say1.0.hv2.izK8x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43044 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: This is sad. Here is a paper by someone with his heart in the right place: "Energetic Limits to Growth," by Jay Hanson -- www.dieoff.com Appeared in ENERGY Magazine, Spring, 1999 http://www.dieoff.org/page175.htm I sympathize with the guy's concern for ecology and his desire for renewable energy. But unfortunately, the paper is riddled with factual errors. This kind of thing hurts his cause more than it helps. Bruce Meland and many CF people have that problem. I have not gone through the paper carefully, but here are a few examples: ICE are 20% efficient, not 50%. Oil exploration and recovery are now much more efficient than they have ever been, not less efficient, thanks to increased knowledge of geology and the use of computers. There is no shortage of uranium fuel. Known reserves will last 70 years. Uranium is as common as tin in the earth's surface. Virtually infinite quantities are available in seawater. It would probably be cost effective to recover it while desalinating water, since the freshwater would be tremendously valuable, and the recovered uranium would power the process with energy to spare. No one is suggesting that automobile hydrogen fuel should be produced by present-day chemical methods. All studies advocate deriving hydrogen from solar or wind power. There is more than enough wind power to accomplish this. Proven reserves of coal would last much longer than 40 years, even if coal is gasified and used in place of petroleum -- which is a ridiculous plan. Wind derived hydrogen would perfectly clean, and cheaper in the long run. Hansen describes a famous wager: In October 1980, Julian Simon challenged Paul Ehrlich and colleagues to a $1,000 bet that in ten years the price of any raw material they selected would fall (measured in constant 1980 dollars). In October 1991, Ehrlich paid up. The prices of the five minerals chosen (copper, chrome, nickel, tin and tungsten) had dropped substantially. Obviously, though, prices did not reflect the fact that ten years' worth of minerals had been taken out of the ground! One concludes that prices give no warning of approaching resource exhaustion. There are three mistakes here: 1. Prices have often given warnings of resource shortages or exhaustion in the past. The economic mechanism may not be perfect, but it does work. 2. The materials taken out of the ground 100 years ago may still be in use. Any material can be recycled, if the cost is high enough. An unexpected breakthrough in a particular recycling technology might occur, or products can be deliberately redesigned to make recycling more cost effective. Laws in Europe have forced computer makers to do this. 3. Prices reflect the use and demand for materials as well as extraction and recycling cost. Manufacturing is more efficient, and improved product design wastes less, so there is less demand for many materials. For example, one of the largest uses of copper in 1980 was in telecommunications. In 1976, the world's first commercial fiber optic cable was laid in Atlanta, and today silicon fiber has replaced copper nearly everywhere, except from the subscriber to the central office. Silicon is cheaper than copper, and the mass of silicon per byte of data is a million times smaller than the mass of copper. All in all, Hansen underestimates people's abilities to innovate and conserve. In company with the Vice President, he ignores resources such as wind power. Naturally, he knows nothing about cold fusion, which is probably not his fault. It may come along and defeat his predictions completely, opening up the resources of the solar system, giving us billions of times more raw materials than we now have access to. We may move all large-scale manufacturing and industrial energy consumption to the moon, where it will not bother anyone or hurt the earth's ecology. - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Jun 8 15:30:58 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id PAA15570; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 15:30:14 -0700 Resent-Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 15:30:14 -0700 From: Robin van Spaandonk To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Primordial Gas Cloud & Spacecraft Drag Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2001 08:29:37 +1000 Organization: Improving Message-ID: References: <002201c0efff$74f9c9c0$e2b4bfa8 computer> In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id PAA15533 Resent-Message-ID: <"Mihlw1.0.Bp3.r7L8x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43045 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: In reply to Mitchell Jones's message of Fri, 8 Jun 2001 10:14:17 -0500: [snip] >poles again, and so on. If this flow pattern were strong enough, it would >produce an observable differential rotation pattern in Earth's atmosphere, >such that the atmosphere would rotate more slowly at higher altitudes, and >more slowly nearer to the poles. However, Earth is a small planet, close to [snip] >region where Earth's gravity is dominant. (Note: Earth's magnetic field >acts as a shield against the solar wind.) --MJ}*** Is it possible that the Earth's magnetic field *is* the detectable effect of the aether flow? [snip] Regards, Robin van Spaandonk A Future For Humanity see: http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ New model hydrogen atom see http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/New-hydrogen.html From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Jun 8 15:33:20 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id PAA16571; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 15:32:37 -0700 Resent-Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 15:32:37 -0700 From: Robin van Spaandonk To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Depressing comments in Chemistry magazine Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2001 08:32:00 +1000 Organization: Improving Message-ID: References: <5.0.2.1.2.20010608110516.02928378 pop.mindspring.com> <3B211067.3A96C8E1@ix.netcom.com> In-Reply-To: <3B211067.3A96C8E1 ix.netcom.com> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id PAA16535 Resent-Message-ID: <"j9KqI.0.q24.4AL8x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43046 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: In reply to Edmund Storms's message of Fri, 08 Jun 2001 11:51:00 -0600: >Jed, I also saw this article and sent an e-mail message to the editor. I >received no reply. It is amazing how ignorance just keeps multiplying. >Imagine how many other "facts" we are caused to believe because we have no way >of checking them. > >Ed Personally I favour a conspiracy theory (any one will do). :) Regards, Robin van Spaandonk A Future For Humanity see: http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ New model hydrogen atom see http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/New-hydrogen.html From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Jun 8 15:37:03 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id PAA18295; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 15:36:23 -0700 Resent-Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 15:36:23 -0700 Message-ID: <3B215342.3264295D ix.netcom.com> Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2001 15:35:46 -0700 From: Akira Kawasaki X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en]C-CCK-MCD NSCPCD472 (Win95; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Vortex Subject: [Fwd: What's New for Jun 08, 2001] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"4rF6E1.0.nT4.cDL8x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43047 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: -------- Original Message -------- Subject: What's New for Jun 08, 2001 Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 17:20:17 -0400 (EDT) From: "What's New" To: aki ix.netcom.com WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 8 Jun 01 Washington, DC 1. "THE SCIENCES": THE VOICE OF SCIENCE IS GROWING FAINTER. The New York Academy of Sciences will cease publication of its 40- year-old award-winning magazine immediately. These days, with the public being sold everything from perpetual motion to magnetic insoles, all in the name of science, the decision to pull the plug on what is surely the world's classiest science magazine comes as a rude shock. Beautifully written and edited, "The Sciences" demonstrated that good science is not incompatible with literacy and a sense of humor. Rather than head shots of scientists and experimental schematics, for example, it has been illustrated with art gleaned from galleries everywhere. The connection between the science and the art is often whimsical. I have long imagined that the person who selects the art to go with the science must surely have the world's most enjoyable job. 2. GLOBAL WARMING: IS THE SCIENTIFIC DEBATE COOLING DOWN? The National Academy this week delivered a report on global warming, requested by the Bush administration. While emphasizing the need for additional climate research to reduce uncertainties, the report concluded that global warming has taken place in the last 50 years as a result of human activity. According to the report, this conclusion "accurately reflects the current thinking of the scientific community." Indeed, there are hints of a scientific consensus. Rather than scoffing at the idea, critics now seem to argue that if there is warming, it's probably good for us. 3. MISSILE DEFENSE: IS SOMETHING BETTER THAN NOTHING? Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld is pushing for a rudimentary missile defense by the end of President Bush's current term in 2004, whether it has been fully tested or not. He's unlikely to get any argument from the Defense Policy Board, which will be headed by super hawk, Richard Perle. An Assistant Secretary of Defense in the Reagan administration, Perle was a chief Pentagon architect of Reagan's hopelessly impractical Star Wars missile defense (WN 13 Mar 87). Carl Sagan called once him "the Prince of Darkness." 4. EMF: ABC NEWS DISCOVERS CANCER CLUSTERS. Three older men, working in the same office in Albuquerque, NM, came down with breast cancer. Male breast cancer is a fairly rare disease, suggesting a possible environmental cause. Monday, they appeared on ABC Good Morning America, with their lawyers, to discuss what Diane Sawyer called a "chilling medical mystery." Guess what? They solved the mystery. It had to be the electromagnetic fields from a power vault next to their office. Never mind that other offices have power vaults and no male breast cancer. There was no statistician on the show to discuss clustering, no cancer researcher to discuss the results of epidemiological studies (WN 4 Jul 97) and no scientist to explain why EMF at power line frequencies cannot create mutant strands of DNA. THE AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY (Note: Opinions are the author's and are not necessarily shared by the APS, but they should be.) From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Jun 8 18:34:50 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id SAA13009; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 18:34:09 -0700 Resent-Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 18:34:09 -0700 Message-ID: <008f01c0f07b$8d3861a0$e2b4bfa8 computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: Cc: References: <5.0.2.1.2.20010608173552.02982b20 pop.mindspring.com> Subject: Re: Many of mistakes in this paper. Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 19:31:23 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Resent-Message-ID: <"-sz9-1.0.7B3.HqN8x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43048 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jed Rothwell" To: Sent: Friday, June 08, 2001 5:18 PM Subject: Many of mistakes in this paper. Jed wrote: > This is sad. Here is a paper by someone with his heart in the right place: > > "Energetic Limits to Growth," by Jay Hanson -- www.dieoff.com > Appeared in ENERGY Magazine, Spring, 1999 > > http://www.dieoff.org/page175.htm > > No one is suggesting that automobile hydrogen fuel should be produced by > present-day chemical methods. All studies advocate deriving hydrogen from > solar or wind power. There is more than enough wind power to accomplish this. At what cost Jed? It takes 25 Kw-Hr per pound of Hydrogen produced. At $.10/ kw-hr and 55,000 btu/lb heat of combustion for H2 you are getting close to $2.50 for the energy equivalent of a gallon of gasoline or diesel. Even if you commited all of the hydro and nuclear to hydrogen production you couldn't come close to meeting the demand. OTOH, Biomass wastes and crops can be partially oxidized to carbon monoxide: Cellulose portion of plants: 1, C6H10O5 + 3 O2 ---> 6 CO + 5 H2O + heat 2, 6 CO + 6 H2O ----> 6 CO2 + 6 H2 Lignin portion of plants: 1, C6H8O2 + 4 O2 ---> 6 CO + 4 H2O 2, 6 CO + 6 H2O ---> 6 CO2 + 6 H2 At $25.00/ton for collecting/producingbiomass wastes/crops and about $25.00/ton for concentrating atmospheric O2 (about 300 kw-hr/ton for cryogenic production) you are at about $500/ton of Hydrogen (about $0.25/lb). Regards, Frederick > > - Jed > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Jun 8 18:52:07 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id SAA19612; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 18:50:51 -0700 Resent-Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 18:50:51 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Sender: mjones pop.jump.net Message-Id: In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 20:47:06 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Mitchell Jones Subject: Re: Nemesis: The Death Star Resent-Message-ID: <"Bl0Lc2.0.Ho4.w3O8x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43049 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: ***{Several days ago I attempted to elicit some comments from this group concerning Dr. Richard Muller's theory that Sol (the sun) is in an elliptical orbit with a hidden companion star, probably a red dwarf, which he calls "Nemesis." According to his book, the period of Nemesis' orbit is about 26 million years and, at its closest approach it is about 1 light year from Sol--close enough to tkick loose a storm of comets from the Oort cloud, when then rain down on Earth, triggering mass extinctions. He posits the existence of such a star in an attempt to explain the paleontological data of Raup and Sepkoski, which show that the last ten mass extinctions on Earth had a periodicity of, very roughly, 26 million years. Since this theory flies in the face of prevailing scientific views, I think it merits some discussion here. For those who would like to read a summary of Dr. Muller's theory, please check out http://muller.lbl.gov/pages/lbl-nem.htm. Even better, if you can obtain it, would be to read a copy of *Nemesis: The Death Star*. (Highly recommended! :-) The other day I posted to this group a copy of a note which I had e-mailed to Dr. Muller, which outlined a new variant of the Nemesis theory that had occurred to me. Since that post elicited no feedback from this group, I looked back over it again, and decided that it was so cryptic that none of you probably understood it. (Muller understood it because he understands his theory. For you guys, however, more info is required. :-) Therefore, in the interests of stimulating a discussion, I'm going to elaborate a bit. Note first that the sun (Sol) is on the inside edge of the Orion spiral arm, about 8500 parsecs from the center of the galaxy, and about 8 parsecs above the midplane. Because the galaxy has a thickness of (very roughly) 1500 parsecs in the region near the sun, and because the center of gravity of the galactic disc is at the midplane, every star in the disc is constantly bobbing up and down, going above the midplane, then below, then above it again, and so on. This behavior is an instance of harmonic motion, analogous to the up and down motion of a lead weight hanging from a spring or to the swinging of a pendulum back and forth through the vertical, with the difference being that the periods of the stars are on the order of millions of years rather than a few seconds. It was this bobbing up and down that provided the genesis of my idea. By Muller's version, remember, Nemesis is in an elliptical orbit around Sol (the sun), with its closest approach being at a distance of about 1 light year. Unfortunately, 13 years have elapsed since he published his theory, and, despite a lot of searching, astronomers have failed to find any Nemesis candidates that are close enough to Sol to be in orbit around it. Hence my idea: maybe Nemesis is not gravitationally bound to Sol at all. Instead, maybe Nemesis is an independent star, bobbing up and down like Sol, which which is pretty much in an inverse harmonic relationship with it: when Sol is rising above the midplane, Nemesis is descending below it; when Sol is descending below it, Nemesis is rising above it; and so on. By my idea, Nemesis and Sol are *not* gravitationally bound, and as a consequence, will normally be separated by great distances. Once every 26 million years however, they pass one another like two ships in the night, and a shower of comets into the inner solar system will be the result. With that background, here is my e-mail to Dr. Muller again: >"Hi Richard. I read your book, *Nemesis: The Death Star* several years ago. >The other day, while flipping through it again, it occurred to me that >Nemesis doesn't really have to be in orbit around the sun (Sol). Suppose, >instead, that as Sol bobs up and down in its roughly circular spiral path >around the center of the galaxy, Nemesis is following a similar trajectory, >but with the following difference: Sol bobs up and down with a period of >roughly 26 million years, and Nemesis bobs up and down with a period of >roughly 52 million years. Result: on every half-cycle, which will be about >26 million years, Nemesis will cross the galactic plane--which means: it >will pass near Sol and disrupt the Oort comet cloud. Result: a rain of >comets into the inner solar system. If this theory is correct, then Nemesis >would not have to be a red dwarf: it could be a much larger star that is >typically much farther from the sun than the .73 pc which you supposed in >your book (pg. 106). What do you think? --Mitchell Jones" Dr. Muller responded to the above message, and we have been kicking my idea around for the last few days, with him against it and me for it. (Now there's a surprise! :-) Result: I have been forced to modify the idea somewhat in response to his criticisms. Here are quotes from a couple of my recent messages to him, which hopefully will make it clear how my idea has evolved: (1) He objected that all of the stars have the same bobbing period, making an analogy to the weight on a spring model of harmonic motion, and he also pointed out that Sol's bobbing period is roughly twice the interval between mass extinctions on Earth, rather than equal to it. Here was my response: > ***{OK, then suppose that Sol and Nemesis have almost the same period, > with the graphs of their motion being virtual mirror images of one > another--i.e., suppose that when Sol is above the midplane, Nemesis is > roughly an equal distance below it, and vice-versa. In that case, the > required roughly 26 million year periodicity for close encounters is > obtained, despite the difficulties associated with a force that increases > as you move away from the midplane. --MJ}*** (2) He suggested that I needed to demonstrate the stability of the orbit I was proposing, to which I replied: > ***{What orbit? :-) My concept is that these guys are moving primarily > under the influence of the mass of the galactic disc itself, and, thus, > are moving essentially independently of one another, like two pendulums in > parallel planes that swing past each other in opposite directions. In > other words, Nemesis and Sol are not a bound system: if the galactic disc > were to suddenly vanish, they would fly off quite independently of one > another. --MJ}*** (3) He repeated the claim (from his book) that Nemesis needed to approach to within 1 light year of Sol, to which I responded: > ***{The heart of the Oort comet cloud is at about 70,000 AU. It is > reasonable to suppose that Nemesis also is surrounded by a comet cloud and > that the heart of it is also at about 70,000 AU. If the center of one > cloud passes through the center of the other, that should cause enough > disruption to rain comets into the inner solar system. Thus the closest > that Nemesis and Sol have to approach each other is roughly 2(70,000) = > 140,000 AU, or about 2.2 light years. --MJ}*** (4) He suggested that, after one close approach, the bobbing patterns of Nemesis and Sol would be so perturbed that they would never approach one another again, to which I responded: > ***{If we assume that Nemesis and Sol are identical systems and that the > separation distance on a close pass is 2.2 light years, the maximum force > of attraction between them will be F = GMm/r^2 = > (6.672x10^-8)(1.9891x10^33)^2/[(2.2)(9.4605x10^17)]^2 = 6.09x10^22 dynes. > > How significant is that? Well, if it were applied to Nemesis (or Sol) for > 1 million years (which it wouldn't be), total change in velocity would be > a*t = (F/m)t = (6.09x10^22/1.9891x10^33)(10^6)(365.25)(24)(3600) = > 9.7x10^-25 cm/sec. > > With the typical velocities of stars in the local group being roughly 220 > km/sec, I don't think we have to worry very much about Sol perturbing > Nemesis or vice versa! :-) > > Bottom line: this sort of mechanism looks stable enough to last through > ten 26-million-year cycles, as required by the original Raup and Sepkoski > data--or twenty, or thirty, or fifty cycles, for that matter. > > --Mitchell Jones}*** That's pretty much where things stand at the moment. As I indicated the other day, I am intensely interested in this topic, and I would appreciate any comments or criticisms that anybody would care to toss at me. Am I way off base here, or not? --Mitchell Jones}*** ________________ Quote of the month: "Always strive to be accurate, even when it doesn't matter, so that you can be accurate when it does matter." --Jude Acers From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Jun 8 20:49:06 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id UAA27269; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 20:48:17 -0700 Resent-Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 20:48:17 -0700 Message-ID: <00ab01c0f08e$4a13ae80$e2b4bfa8 computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: Cc: References: Subject: Re: Nemesis: The Death Star Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 21:45:35 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Resent-Message-ID: <"9Dukc3.0._f6.0oP8x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43050 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mitchell Jones" To: Sent: Friday, June 08, 2001 8:47 PM Subject: Re: Nemesis: The Death Star The 26 million year mass extinction cycle theory was put forth by paleontologists David Raup and John Sepkoski of the Unversity of Chicago in 1983. One version of the companion "death star" theory shortly after Raup and Sepkoski was put forth by Daniel Whitmire of the University of Southwestern Louisiana and Albert Jackson of Computer Sciences Corp.of Houston. The other version was put forth by Marc Davis and Richard Muller of the University of California at Berkely along with Piet Hut of the Institute of Advanced Study in Princton, New Jersey. The theory that the cycle is caused by the periodic passing of the Sun through the galactic plane every 60 million years was put forth by Michael Rampino and Richard Stothers of the Goddard Institute for Space Studys in New York City. The latter seems close to what you propose. Regards, Frederick > ***{Several days ago I attempted to elicit some comments from this group > concerning Dr. Richard Muller's theory that Sol (the sun) is in an > elliptical orbit with a hidden companion star, probably a red dwarf, which > he calls "Nemesis." According to his book, the period of Nemesis' orbit is > about 26 million years and, at its closest approach it is about 1 light > year from Sol--close enough to tkick loose a storm of comets from the Oort > cloud, when then rain down on Earth, triggering mass extinctions. He posits > the existence of such a star in an attempt to explain the paleontological > data of Raup and Sepkoski, which show that the last ten mass extinctions on > Earth had a periodicity of, very roughly, 26 million years. Since this > theory flies in the face of prevailing scientific views, I think it merits > some discussion here. For those who would like to read a summary of Dr. > Muller's theory, please check out http://muller.lbl.gov/pages/lbl-nem.htm. > Even better, if you can obtain it, would be to read a copy of *Nemesis: The > Death Star*. (Highly recommended! :-) > > The other day I posted to this group a copy of a note which I had e-mailed > to Dr. Muller, which outlined a new variant of the Nemesis theory that had > occurred to me. Since that post elicited no feedback from this group, I > looked back over it again, and decided that it was so cryptic that none of > you probably understood it. (Muller understood it because he understands > his theory. For you guys, however, more info is required. :-) Therefore, in > the interests of stimulating a discussion, I'm going to elaborate a bit. > > Note first that the sun (Sol) is on the inside edge of the Orion spiral > arm, about 8500 parsecs from the center of the galaxy, and about 8 parsecs > above the midplane. Because the galaxy has a thickness of (very roughly) > 1500 parsecs in the region near the sun, and because the center of gravity > of the galactic disc is at the midplane, every star in the disc is > constantly bobbing up and down, going above the midplane, then below, then > above it again, and so on. This behavior is an instance of harmonic motion, > analogous to the up and down motion of a lead weight hanging from a spring > or to the swinging of a pendulum back and forth through the vertical, with > the difference being that the periods of the stars are on the order of > millions of years rather than a few seconds. > > It was this bobbing up and down that provided the genesis of my idea. > > By Muller's version, remember, Nemesis is in an elliptical orbit around Sol > (the sun), with its closest approach being at a distance of about 1 light > year. Unfortunately, 13 years have elapsed since he published his theory, > and, despite a lot of searching, astronomers have failed to find any > Nemesis candidates that are close enough to Sol to be in orbit around it. > Hence my idea: maybe Nemesis is not gravitationally bound to Sol at all. > Instead, maybe Nemesis is an independent star, bobbing up and down like > Sol, which which is pretty much in an inverse harmonic relationship with > it: when Sol is rising above the midplane, Nemesis is descending below it; > when Sol is descending below it, Nemesis is rising above it; and so on. By > my idea, Nemesis and Sol are *not* gravitationally bound, and as a > consequence, will normally be separated by great distances. Once every 26 > million years however, they pass one another like two ships in the night, > and a shower of comets into the inner solar system will be the result. > > With that background, here is my e-mail to Dr. Muller again: > > >"Hi Richard. I read your book, *Nemesis: The Death Star* several years ago. > >The other day, while flipping through it again, it occurred to me that > >Nemesis doesn't really have to be in orbit around the sun (Sol). Suppose, > >instead, that as Sol bobs up and down in its roughly circular spiral path > >around the center of the galaxy, Nemesis is following a similar trajectory, > >but with the following difference: Sol bobs up and down with a period of > >roughly 26 million years, and Nemesis bobs up and down with a period of > >roughly 52 million years. Result: on every half-cycle, which will be about > >26 million years, Nemesis will cross the galactic plane--which means: it > >will pass near Sol and disrupt the Oort comet cloud. Result: a rain of > >comets into the inner solar system. If this theory is correct, then Nemesis > >would not have to be a red dwarf: it could be a much larger star that is > >typically much farther from the sun than the .73 pc which you supposed in > >your book (pg. 106). What do you think? --Mitchell Jones" > > Dr. Muller responded to the above message, and we have been kicking my idea > around for the last few days, with him against it and me for it. (Now > there's a surprise! :-) Result: I have been forced to modify the idea > somewhat in response to his criticisms. Here are quotes from a couple of my > recent messages to him, which hopefully will make it clear how my idea has > evolved: > > (1) He objected that all of the stars have the same bobbing period, making > an analogy to the weight on a spring model of harmonic motion, and he also > pointed out that Sol's bobbing period is roughly twice the interval between > mass extinctions on Earth, rather than equal to it. Here was my response: > > > ***{OK, then suppose that Sol and Nemesis have almost the same period, > > with the graphs of their motion being virtual mirror images of one > > another--i.e., suppose that when Sol is above the midplane, Nemesis is > > roughly an equal distance below it, and vice-versa. In that case, the > > required roughly 26 million year periodicity for close encounters is > > obtained, despite the difficulties associated with a force that increases > > as you move away from the midplane. --MJ}*** > > (2) He suggested that I needed to demonstrate the stability of the orbit I > was proposing, to which I replied: > > > ***{What orbit? :-) My concept is that these guys are moving primarily > > under the influence of the mass of the galactic disc itself, and, thus, > > are moving essentially independently of one another, like two pendulums in > > parallel planes that swing past each other in opposite directions. In > > other words, Nemesis and Sol are not a bound system: if the galactic disc > > were to suddenly vanish, they would fly off quite independently of one > > another. --MJ}*** > > (3) He repeated the claim (from his book) that Nemesis needed to approach > to within 1 light year of Sol, to which I responded: > > > ***{The heart of the Oort comet cloud is at about 70,000 AU. It is > > reasonable to suppose that Nemesis also is surrounded by a comet cloud and > > that the heart of it is also at about 70,000 AU. If the center of one > > cloud passes through the center of the other, that should cause enough > > disruption to rain comets into the inner solar system. Thus the closest > > that Nemesis and Sol have to approach each other is roughly 2(70,000) = > > 140,000 AU, or about 2.2 light years. --MJ}*** > > (4) He suggested that, after one close approach, the bobbing patterns of > Nemesis and Sol would be so perturbed that they would never approach one > another again, to which I responded: > > > ***{If we assume that Nemesis and Sol are identical systems and that the > > separation distance on a close pass is 2.2 light years, the maximum force > > of attraction between them will be F = GMm/r^2 = > > (6.672x10^-8)(1.9891x10^33)^2/[(2.2)(9.4605x10^17)]^2 = 6.09x10^22 dynes. > > > > How significant is that? Well, if it were applied to Nemesis (or Sol) for > > 1 million years (which it wouldn't be), total change in velocity would be > > a*t = (F/m)t = (6.09x10^22/1.9891x10^33)(10^6)(365.25)(24)(3600) = > > 9.7x10^-25 cm/sec. > > > > With the typical velocities of stars in the local group being roughly 220 > > km/sec, I don't think we have to worry very much about Sol perturbing > > Nemesis or vice versa! :-) > > > > Bottom line: this sort of mechanism looks stable enough to last through > > ten 26-million-year cycles, as required by the original Raup and Sepkoski > > data--or twenty, or thirty, or fifty cycles, for that matter. > > > > --Mitchell Jones}*** > > That's pretty much where things stand at the moment. As I indicated the > other day, I am intensely interested in this topic, and I would appreciate > any comments or criticisms that anybody would care to toss at me. Am I way > off base here, or not? > > --Mitchell Jones}*** > ________________ > Quote of the month: > > "Always strive to be accurate, even when it doesn't matter, so that you can > be accurate when it does matter." --Jude Acers > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Jun 8 21:18:33 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id VAA03375; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 21:17:50 -0700 Resent-Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 21:17:50 -0700 From: "Matthew Rogers" To: Subject: RE: Nemesis: The Death Star Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 21:17:42 -0700 Message-ID: <002d01c0f09b$212cdfc0$a2962640 bear> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 In-reply-to: Importance: Normal Resent-Message-ID: <"V_IKt.0.fq.jDQ8x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43051 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Mitchell, Good work. There is precedence for your theory. You may have gravitationally bound harmonics in a orbiting system with separate orbits. There are several levels of these harmonics. However Occam's Razor postulates that you do not need the Nemesis star. Your theory is sound, as moons of Jupiter and Saturn exhibit harmonics, and therefore any gravitationally bound system may do so. Your theory misses out the relevant facts that the galactic disk may also be in fact a breeding ground for much vaster numbers of dark cometary material. Just the passing of the sun through these lanes may in fact cause the event you described. This would explain how the comets in our solar system may actually come in all angles to the plane of solar elliptic and plane of galactic elliptic. A Particle ( excuse the ASCII ART ) called the Solar system Moves through the galactic plane. 0 oo 0 0 oooo <- 26 million years ->oooo 0 OOOOOOOOOO(0)OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO(0)OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO oooo 0 oooo oo 0 0 0 0 The sun then would trade stable OORT cloud comets with the "OORT filled Galactic Plane" The remaining years of passage would be the distillation of the unstable orbits. The Masses of Saturn and Jupiter and the Sun would serve to eject most of the inner comets crossing those orbits into deep space Thus the function of stars like the Sun would function to "stir'" up the galactic plane and introduce more elements into its system, as well as causing gravitational eddy currents that may actually spawn more star systems. This also would have some larger and some comparatively few extinctions depending on the density of the galactic disk, as noted by evidence. We may find that not only our earth is in the right place for life to occur ( read water vapor ) but we are orbiting the galaxy at the right distance and the right way to keep our oceans full. We have plenty of evidence that once you add up all the factors, there is a Creator. Nice design! Thanks. Hope to be around 26 million years from now to see ! Interesting to note that in the Creative account of the earth written in Genesis by Moses, and parts of Psalms, before there was life even, that even the astronomical way the earth was formed was accurately expressed in Hebrew language, thousands of years before the invention of the telescope. Cheers ! Matthew Rogers Prove it.. -----Original Message----- From: Mitchell Jones [mailto:mjones jump.net] Sent: Friday, June 08, 2001 6:47 PM To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Nemesis: The Death Star ***{Several days ago I attempted to elicit some comments from this group concerning Dr. Richard Muller's theory that Sol (the sun) is in an elliptical orbit with a hidden companion star, probably a red dwarf, which he calls "Nemesis." According to his book, the period of Nemesis' orbit is about 26 million years and, at its closest approach it is about 1 light year from Sol--close enough to tkick loose a storm of comets from the Oort cloud, when then rain down on Earth, triggering mass extinctions. He posits the existence of such a star in an attempt to explain the paleontological data of Raup and Sepkoski, which show that the last ten mass extinctions on Earth had a periodicity of, very roughly, 26 million years. Since this theory flies in the face of prevailing scientific views, I think it merits some discussion here. For those who would like to read a summary of Dr. Muller's theory, please check out http://muller.lbl.gov/pages/lbl-nem.htm. Even better, if you can obtain it, would be to read a copy of *Nemesis: The Death Star*. (Highly recommended! :-) The other day I posted to this group a copy of a note which I had e-mailed to Dr. Muller, which outlined a new variant of the Nemesis theory that had occurred to me. Since that post elicited no feedback from this group, I looked back over it again, and decided that it was so cryptic that none of you probably understood it. (Muller understood it because he understands his theory. For you guys, however, more info is required. :-) Therefore, in the interests of stimulating a discussion, I'm going to elaborate a bit. Note first that the sun (Sol) is on the inside edge of the Orion spiral arm, about 8500 parsecs from the center of the galaxy, and about 8 parsecs above the midplane. Because the galaxy has a thickness of (very roughly) 1500 parsecs in the region near the sun, and because the center of gravity of the galactic disc is at the midplane, every star in the disc is constantly bobbing up and down, going above the midplane, then below, then above it again, and so on. This behavior is an instance of harmonic motion, analogous to the up and down motion of a lead weight hanging from a spring or to the swinging of a pendulum back and forth through the vertical, with the difference being that the periods of the stars are on the order of millions of years rather than a few seconds. It was this bobbing up and down that provided the genesis of my idea. By Muller's version, remember, Nemesis is in an elliptical orbit around Sol (the sun), with its closest approach being at a distance of about 1 light year. Unfortunately, 13 years have elapsed since he published his theory, and, despite a lot of searching, astronomers have failed to find any Nemesis candidates that are close enough to Sol to be in orbit around it. Hence my idea: maybe Nemesis is not gravitationally bound to Sol at all. Instead, maybe Nemesis is an independent star, bobbing up and down like Sol, which which is pretty much in an inverse harmonic relationship with it: when Sol is rising above the midplane, Nemesis is descending below it; when Sol is descending below it, Nemesis is rising above it; and so on. By my idea, Nemesis and Sol are *not* gravitationally bound, and as a consequence, will normally be separated by great distances. Once every 26 million years however, they pass one another like two ships in the night, and a shower of comets into the inner solar system will be the result. With that background, here is my e-mail to Dr. Muller again: >"Hi Richard. I read your book, *Nemesis: The Death Star* several years ago. >The other day, while flipping through it again, it occurred to me that >Nemesis doesn't really have to be in orbit around the sun (Sol). Suppose, >instead, that as Sol bobs up and down in its roughly circular spiral path >around the center of the galaxy, Nemesis is following a similar trajectory, >but with the following difference: Sol bobs up and down with a period of >roughly 26 million years, and Nemesis bobs up and down with a period of >roughly 52 million years. Result: on every half-cycle, which will be about >26 million years, Nemesis will cross the galactic plane--which means: it >will pass near Sol and disrupt the Oort comet cloud. Result: a rain of >comets into the inner solar system. If this theory is correct, then Nemesis >would not have to be a red dwarf: it could be a much larger star that is >typically much farther from the sun than the .73 pc which you supposed in >your book (pg. 106). What do you think? --Mitchell Jones" Dr. Muller responded to the above message, and we have been kicking my idea around for the last few days, with him against it and me for it. (Now there's a surprise! :-) Result: I have been forced to modify the idea somewhat in response to his criticisms. Here are quotes from a couple of my recent messages to him, which hopefully will make it clear how my idea has evolved: (1) He objected that all of the stars have the same bobbing period, making an analogy to the weight on a spring model of harmonic motion, and he also pointed out that Sol's bobbing period is roughly twice the interval between mass extinctions on Earth, rather than equal to it. Here was my response: > ***{OK, then suppose that Sol and Nemesis have almost the same period, > with the graphs of their motion being virtual mirror images of one > another--i.e., suppose that when Sol is above the midplane, Nemesis is > roughly an equal distance below it, and vice-versa. In that case, the > required roughly 26 million year periodicity for close encounters is > obtained, despite the difficulties associated with a force that increases > as you move away from the midplane. --MJ}*** (2) He suggested that I needed to demonstrate the stability of the orbit I was proposing, to which I replied: > ***{What orbit? :-) My concept is that these guys are moving primarily > under the influence of the mass of the galactic disc itself, and, thus, > are moving essentially independently of one another, like two pendulums in > parallel planes that swing past each other in opposite directions. In > other words, Nemesis and Sol are not a bound system: if the galactic disc > were to suddenly vanish, they would fly off quite independently of one > another. --MJ}*** (3) He repeated the claim (from his book) that Nemesis needed to approach to within 1 light year of Sol, to which I responded: > ***{The heart of the Oort comet cloud is at about 70,000 AU. It is > reasonable to suppose that Nemesis also is surrounded by a comet cloud and > that the heart of it is also at about 70,000 AU. If the center of one > cloud passes through the center of the other, that should cause enough > disruption to rain comets into the inner solar system. Thus the closest > that Nemesis and Sol have to approach each other is roughly 2(70,000) = > 140,000 AU, or about 2.2 light years. --MJ}*** (4) He suggested that, after one close approach, the bobbing patterns of Nemesis and Sol would be so perturbed that they would never approach one another again, to which I responded: > ***{If we assume that Nemesis and Sol are identical systems and that the > separation distance on a close pass is 2.2 light years, the maximum force > of attraction between them will be F = GMm/r^2 = > (6.672x10^-8)(1.9891x10^33)^2/[(2.2)(9.4605x10^17)]^2 = 6.09x10^22 dynes. > > How significant is that? Well, if it were applied to Nemesis (or Sol) for > 1 million years (which it wouldn't be), total change in velocity would be > a*t = (F/m)t = (6.09x10^22/1.9891x10^33)(10^6)(365.25)(24)(3600) = > 9.7x10^-25 cm/sec. > > With the typical velocities of stars in the local group being roughly 220 > km/sec, I don't think we have to worry very much about Sol perturbing > Nemesis or vice versa! :-) > > Bottom line: this sort of mechanism looks stable enough to last through > ten 26-million-year cycles, as required by the original Raup and Sepkoski > data--or twenty, or thirty, or fifty cycles, for that matter. > > --Mitchell Jones}*** That's pretty much where things stand at the moment. As I indicated the other day, I am intensely interested in this topic, and I would appreciate any comments or criticisms that anybody would care to toss at me. Am I way off base here, or not? --Mitchell Jones}*** ________________ Quote of the month: "Always strive to be accurate, even when it doesn't matter, so that you can be accurate when it does matter." --Jude Acers From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Jun 9 00:10:45 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id AAA11288; Sat, 9 Jun 2001 00:10:17 -0700 Resent-Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2001 00:10:17 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Sender: mjones pop.jump.net Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <00ab01c0f08e$4a13ae80$e2b4bfa8 computer> References: Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2001 02:05:16 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Mitchell Jones Subject: Re: Nemesis: The Death Star Resent-Message-ID: <"7wUAt1.0.Cm2.OlS8x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43052 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Mitchell Jones" >To: >Sent: Friday, June 08, 2001 8:47 PM >Subject: Re: Nemesis: The Death Star > >The 26 million year mass extinction cycle theory was put >forth by paleontologists David Raup and John Sepkoski of the Unversity of >Chicago in >1983. > >One version of the companion "death star" theory shortly after Raup and >Sepkoski was >put forth by Daniel Whitmire of the University of Southwestern Louisiana >and Albert >Jackson of Computer Sciences Corp.of Houston. >The other version was put forth by Marc Davis and Richard Muller of the >University of >California at Berkely along with Piet Hut of the Institute of Advanced >Study in >Princton, New Jersey. > >The theory that the cycle is caused by the periodic passing >of the Sun through the galactic plane every 60 million years was put forth >by Michael >Rampino and Richard Stothers of the Goddard Institute for Space Studys in >New York >City. > >The latter seems close to what you propose. ***{Thanks for the info. I was unaware that Rampino and Stothers had a horse in the race. From your description, though, I must say I don't see how their idea could work. The plane of the galaxy (a.k.a., the midplane) is defined as the plane which (a) is perpendicular to the axis of rotation of the galaxy, and (b) passes through the galactic center of mass. As such, it is a mathematical abstraction, not a real thing, and thus it exerts no effects on anything. That means another stellar mass--Nemesis--is required to pass near Sol, if the Oort cloud is to be perturbed. Merely passing through the midplane won't do it. Thus I do not really disagree with Rich Muller's basic idea: the star which he called Nemesis is required to make this work. My point is to merely broaden the criteria by which it may be identified. --MJ}*** >Regards, Frederick ________________ Quote of the month: "Always strive to be accurate, even when it doesn't matter, so that you can be accurate when it does matter." --Jude Acers From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Jun 9 08:35:28 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id IAA17122; Sat, 9 Jun 2001 08:34:42 -0700 Resent-Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2001 08:34:42 -0700 Sender: jack granger.centurytel.net Message-ID: <3B223343.3CBEC18C centurytel.net> Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2001 14:32:27 +0000 From: "Taylor J. Smith" X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0C-Caldera (X11; I; Linux 2.2.5-15 i486) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Nemesis: The Death Star References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; name="xds" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="xds" Resent-Message-ID: <"bT4dW1.0.RB4.I8a8x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43053 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Mitchell Jones wrote: ***{Several days ago I attempted to elicit some comments from this group concerning Dr. Richard Muller's theory that Sol (the sun) is in an elliptical orbit with a hidden companion star, probably a red dwarf, which he calls "Nemesis." ... He posits the existence of such a star in an attempt to explain the paleontological data of Raup and Sepkoski, which show that the last ten mass extinctions on Earth had a periodicity of, very roughly, 26 million years. ... For those who would like to read a summary of Dr. Muller's theory, please check out http://muller.lbl.gov/pages/lbl-nem.htm. Frederick Sparber wrote: ... The theory that the cycle is caused by the periodic passing of the Sun through the galactic plane every 60 million years was put forth by Michael Rampino and Richard Stothers of the Goddard Institute for Space Studys in New York City. Mitchell Jones wrote: ***{Thanks for the info. I was unaware that Rampino and Stothers had a horse in the race. From your description, though, I must say I don't see how their idea could work. ... Another stellar mass--Nemesis--is required to pass near Sol, if the Oort cloud is to be perturbed. Merely passing through the midplane won't do it. Matthew Rogers wrote: ... Occam's Razor postulates that you do not need the Nemesis star. Your theory misses out the relevant facts that the galactic disk may also be in fact a breeding ground for much vaster numbers of dark cometary material. Just the passing of the sun through these lanes may in fact cause the event you described ... Hi Mitchell, I went to http://muller.lbl.gov/pages/lbl-nem.htm. There was an interesting transformation of the paleontological data of Raup and Sepkoski, but I could not find the data itself. Please give me a web reference where I can find the data. Most interesting to me at the above site is Dr. Richard Muller's related theory of ice ages. Unfortunately his treatment of this subject was very brief, and no links or references were given. I would appreciate any further information on this topic. Thanks, Jack Smith From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Jun 9 08:48:37 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id IAA21114; Sat, 9 Jun 2001 08:47:52 -0700 Resent-Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2001 08:47:52 -0700 Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2001 08:46:04 -0700 From: Jones Beene Subject: Re: Many of mistakes in this paper. To: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-to: jonesb9 pacbell.net Message-id: <0GEO004GD6J94F mta5.snfc21.pbi.net> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Opera 5.11 build 904 Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Resent-Message-ID: <"Crm483.0.l95.eKa8x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43054 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Frederick Sparber wrote: >At what cost Jed? It takes 25 Kw-Hr per pound of Hydrogen produced. >At $.10/ kw-hr and 55,000 btu/lb heat of combustion for H2 you are getting >close to $2.50 for the energy equivalent of a gallon of gasoline or diesel. >OTOH, Biomass wastes and crops can be partially oxidized to carbon >monoxide.... about $500/ton of Hydrogen (about $0.25/lb). Hi Frederick, Yes, just consider this promising technology, Biomass conversion, as one more oversight in the brain-dead energy "policy" of the Bush gang. The average joe was kind of secretly smirking when the only energy problem, which was fostered by these greed mongers who stole the White House, was far away in California (they deserve it, don't they?). But now that manipulated high prices are coming home to main street, things are beginning to sour a bit for shrub & the good ol' boys. Their so-called policy document is more a legalized money grab than anythinbg else. BTW, do they have a "recall" at the national level? One hidden reason that Bush and Cheney have neglected biomass (which is based on real economic evidence, as cynical as it sounds) is that biomass would greatly benefit the American farmer, especially on marginal Western lands, owned by a smallish nonvocal constituency that would never vote for the liberals anyway. They don't "want" to hurt these guys really, but there is an unobvious repurcussion: cheaper land prices in oil country for their friends and supporters to gobble up. The major controllable cost of oil production these days is not exploration or production but land acquisition. That is why they are so focused on getting Federal land like the Alaska wildlife refuge, etc. Give Bush another term and it will be Yellowstone. And don't forget... those marginalized farmers would make more money as deep drillers anyway (just ask Bruce Willis). But an even cheaper hydrogen economy solution than Biomass (potentially) comes from the technology of Melis Energy and a few other startup comapanies and their collaborators at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). Dr. Tasios Melis has uncovered a truly remarkable metabolic process by which plain old green algae (suitably modified) is stimulated to produce significant amounts of hydrogen, instead of oxygen, during photosynthesis. "I guess it's the equivalent of striking oil," said the UC Berkeley biology professor. "It was enormously exciting, it was unbelievable." The story of this discovery was published in The San Francisco Chronicle on Jan 29, 2000. Melis is a top priority on the Bush/Cheney hit list. Regards, Jones Beene From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Jun 9 08:57:34 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id IAA24134; Sat, 9 Jun 2001 08:56:59 -0700 Resent-Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2001 08:56:59 -0700 Message-ID: <00f601c0f0f4$16a87880$e2b4bfa8 computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: Cc: References: <0GEO004GD6J94F mta5.snfc21.pbi.net> Subject: Re: Many of mistakes in this paper. Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2001 09:54:24 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Resent-Message-ID: <"FVvZF2.0.0v5.ATa8x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43055 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jones Beene" To: Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2001 10:46 AM Subject: Re: Many of mistakes in this paper. Agreed Jones. I found out the hard way over the last quarter century, the problems are Not Technical, only Political. Regards, Frederick > Frederick Sparber wrote: > > >At what cost Jed? It takes 25 Kw-Hr per pound of Hydrogen produced. > >At $.10/ kw-hr and 55,000 btu/lb heat of combustion for H2 you are getting > >close to $2.50 for the energy equivalent of a gallon of gasoline or diesel. > > >OTOH, Biomass wastes and crops can be partially oxidized to carbon > >monoxide.... about $500/ton of Hydrogen (about $0.25/lb). > > Hi Frederick, > > Yes, just consider this promising technology, Biomass conversion, as one more > oversight in the brain-dead energy "policy" of the Bush gang. The average joe > was kind of secretly smirking when the only energy problem, which was > fostered by these greed mongers who stole the White House, was far away in > California (they deserve it, don't they?). But now that manipulated high prices > are coming home to main street, things are beginning to sour a bit for shrub & > the good ol' boys. Their so-called policy document is more a legalized money > grab than anythinbg else. > > BTW, do they have a "recall" at the national level? > > One hidden reason that Bush and Cheney have neglected biomass (which is > based on real economic evidence, as cynical as it sounds) is that biomass > would greatly benefit the American farmer, especially on marginal Western > lands, owned by a smallish nonvocal constituency that would never vote for the > liberals anyway. They don't "want" to hurt these guys really, but there is an > unobvious repurcussion: cheaper land prices in oil country for their friends and > supporters to gobble up. The major controllable cost of oil production these > days is not exploration or production but land acquisition. That is why they are > so focused on getting Federal land like the Alaska wildlife refuge, etc. Give > Bush another term and it will be Yellowstone. And don't forget... those > marginalized farmers would make more money as deep drillers anyway (just > ask Bruce Willis). > > But an even cheaper hydrogen economy solution than Biomass (potentially) > comes from the technology of Melis Energy and a few other startup > comapanies and their collaborators at the National Renewable Energy > Laboratory (NREL). > > Dr. Tasios Melis has uncovered a truly remarkable metabolic process by which > plain old green algae (suitably modified) is stimulated to produce significant > amounts of hydrogen, instead of oxygen, during photosynthesis. "I guess it's the > equivalent of striking oil," said the UC Berkeley biology professor. "It was > enormously exciting, it was unbelievable." The story of this discovery was > published in The San Francisco Chronicle on Jan 29, 2000. > > Melis is a top priority on the Bush/Cheney hit list. > > Regards, > > Jones Beene > > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Jun 9 18:25:47 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id SAA09600; Sat, 9 Jun 2001 18:23:43 -0700 Resent-Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2001 18:23:43 -0700 From: Standing Bear To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Nemesis: The Death Star Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2001 21:28:11 -0700 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.1.99] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" References: <3B223343.3CBEC18C@centurytel.net> In-Reply-To: <3B223343.3CBEC18C centurytel.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01060921281100.00886 linux> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id SAA09470 Resent-Message-ID: <"oZdeh2.0.mL2.Umi8x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43056 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: On Saturday 09 June 2001 07:32, Taylor J. Smith wrote: > Mitchell Jones wrote: > > ***{Several days ago I attempted to elicit some comments > from this group concerning Dr. Richard Muller's theory > that Sol (the sun) is in an elliptical orbit with a hidden > companion star, probably a red dwarf, which he calls "Nemesis." > > .... He posits the existence of such a star in an attempt to > explain the paleontological data of Raup and Sepkoski, > which show that the last ten mass extinctions on Earth had > a periodicity of, very roughly, 26 million years. > > .... For those who would like to read a summary of Dr. Muller's > theory, please check out http://muller.lbl.gov/pages/lbl-nem.htm. > > Frederick Sparber wrote: > > .... The theory that the cycle is caused by the periodic passing > of the Sun through the galactic plane every 60 million > years was put forth by Michael Rampino and Richard Stothers > of the Goddard Institute for Space Studys in New York City. > > Mitchell Jones wrote: > > ***{Thanks for the info. I was unaware that Rampino and > Stothers had a horse in the race. From your description, > though, I must say I don't see how their idea could work. > > .... Another stellar mass--Nemesis--is required to > pass near Sol, if the Oort cloud is to be perturbed. Merely > passing through the midplane won't do it. > > Matthew Rogers wrote: > > .... Occam's Razor postulates that you do not need the > Nemesis star. > > Your theory misses out the relevant facts that the galactic > disk may also be in fact a breeding ground for much vaster > numbers of dark cometary material. Just the passing of > the sun through these lanes may in fact cause the event > you described ... > > Hi Mitchell, > > I went to http://muller.lbl.gov/pages/lbl-nem.htm. > There was an interesting transformation of the paleontological > data of Raup and Sepkoski, but I could not find the data itself. > Please give me a web reference where I can find the data. > > Most interesting to me at the above site is > Dr. Richard Muller's related theory of ice ages. Unfortunately > his treatment of this subject was very brief, and no links > or references were given. I would appreciate any further > information on this topic. > > Thanks, Jack Smith this would mean any exploration to another star, even the nearest one, would require a relatively slow journey to pick our way through and chart the space to it. Any warp travel could be hazardous unless the nature of the warp would give some protection to its users in the way of shielding or deflection. We will find a way to utilize this, probably as a by product of research conducted by CERN or others on the fundamental nature of matter at its smallest. Somewhere along the line will be the acquisition of enough enabling technologies to be able to pull it off. An account of a Brazilian taken aboard a small starship says that one of its crew told him, when asked, that: "One day you will figure it out!". That tells me that those folks had some version of the 'Star Trek Prime Directive' as one of their rules in dealing with pre space faring people such as us. It and other published accounts give a picture that seems to back this up. I give the credence one gives propaganda the disinformation campaign of our government, especially seeing that it may be involved in the greatest coverup in history. What a bitter irony that most Americans care more what is under Monica Lewinski's blue dress than what is under Area 51! Space is probably a dangerous place, but we will have to go there someday. We will probably have to learn how to live there too, in romote starbases with populations about that of a small city, way stations in the void. Lee M. Castleton rockcast net-link.net From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Jun 9 18:55:04 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id SAA16892; Sat, 9 Jun 2001 18:53:54 -0700 Resent-Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2001 18:53:54 -0700 From: Hypercom59 aol.com Message-ID: Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2001 21:53:46 EDT Subject: Any questions?? To: vortex-l eskimo.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows 95 sub 120 Resent-Message-ID: <"8u7m61.0.q74.oCj8x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43057 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Group, I was asked to join this elist that I might answer questions about my invention, its strange properties, Micro Plasma Fusion or a better description of my Magnetic Vortex Theory - and no one questions me. There has been nothing interesting mentioned. If there is no reason for me to be here, simply tell me and I will depart. Regards, Chris Arnold From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Jun 9 19:06:16 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id TAA19143; Sat, 9 Jun 2001 19:05:26 -0700 Resent-Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2001 19:05:26 -0700 From: "Matthew Rogers" To: Subject: RE: Any questions?? Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2001 19:05:18 -0700 Message-ID: <000e01c0f151$cc8e59a0$a2962640 bear> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 In-Reply-To: Resent-Message-ID: <"glKTj1.0.yg4.bNj8x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43058 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Well, show us what you have ! We like to see lots of test data, pictures, and such. Then we ask you questions! Thanks, Matthew Rogers Prove it.. -----Original Message----- From: Hypercom59 aol.com [mailto:Hypercom59@aol.com] Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2001 6:54 PM To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Any questions?? Group, I was asked to join this elist that I might answer questions about my invention, its strange properties, Micro Plasma Fusion or a better description of my Magnetic Vortex Theory - and no one questions me. There has been nothing interesting mentioned. If there is no reason for me to be here, simply tell me and I will depart. Regards, Chris Arnold From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Jun 9 19:08:16 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id TAA19487; Sat, 9 Jun 2001 19:06:54 -0700 Resent-Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2001 19:06:54 -0700 From: "Matthew Rogers" To: Subject: RE: Candidate for universal gravitational glue Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2001 19:06:43 -0700 Message-ID: <000f01c0f151$ff170e80$a2962640 bear> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0010_01C0F117.52B83680" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 In-Reply-To: <65.1547c792.284aff04 aol.com> Resent-Message-ID: <"IaFoK3.0.Lm4.zOj8x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43059 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0010_01C0F117.52B83680 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Thomas, Gravity is a force not a particle. Gravity is the weakest force in the universe. Gravity can exert its force over long distances at the speed of light. Gravity is the only attractive force that has no known particle associated with it. When the particle is found that generates the field that causes gravity and inertia ( the two are equal ) then science will unify all known forces. Neutrinos have very little interaction with matter, however there is many of them. If they even have a little mass, then they would have a large effect of a source of mass on the structure of the universe, but still not have any effect on us beings of matter. Even the dense core of a Neutron star is essentially transparent to neutrino ’s. Only a Black hole would have an effect on a neutrino with a 100% probability, because of the curvature of space is less than one. Thus a neutrino is treated like any Speed of light particle and prevented from escapeing the event horizion. If you could create a beam of any speed of light particle and beam it at a black hole, nothing would come out, not even the wispy neutrino. The worlds most sensitive Neutrino observatory in Japan detected less than 10 neutrino events from the 1986a supernova, a galaxy away, even though trillions per square inch per second sleeted through our galaxy. Neutrino’s may have mass, which means enough of them exert a gravitational force, but they would be just like any other matter with gravitational force. So what is the property of Mass, and why would different aspects of mass like inertial mass=gravitational mass. That is still the unknown, and will be till we have a partical acceleration system powerful enough, or a computing system powerful enough on existing accelerators to detect the fields and particals that give matter mass and gravity. Do a search on the Higgs particle and the Higgs Field, and you will see that. Also consider that even though the mind may be powerful enough to visualize physics like Stephen Hawking, your electrical fields that your brain creates are several orders of magnitude less than what is required to influence matter around it. Consider, everything you do is an interaction with the strongest force in the universe. Matthew Rogers Prove it.. -----Original Message----- From: ConexTom aol.com [mailto:ConexTom@aol.com] Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2001 7:46 PM To: vortex-l eskimo.com; DEACH@topica.com Cc: tom rhfweb.com Subject: Fwd: Candidate for universal gravitational glue Subj: Fw: Candidate for universal gravitational glue Date: 6/2/01 11:41:42 AM Pacific Daylight Time From: etimes teleport.com (Bruce Meland) To: tom rhfweb.com CC: conextom aol.com Hi Tom I believe some form of these neutrinos are the gravity particles. Bruce Candidate for universal gravitational glue UPI Science News Thursday June 4 9:34 PM EDT TAKAYAMA, Japan, June 5 (UPI) - Researchers say they have identifed what may be the unseen gravitational glue _ the so-called dark matter responsible in part for the evolution of the universe from the moment of its birth: neutrinos. A serious candidate for this glue, neutrinos are invisible, sub- atomic particles, created at the time of the Big Bang, that stream through the Earth, people and everything else unfettered. The groundbreaking discovery, announced Friday in Japan by an international team of scientists, was that neutrinos have mass. Because the particles fill the universe, scientists say, collectively they may have the force to reverse its expansive course to cause the ``Big Crunch.'' So fundamental a discovery, they said at Neutrino '98, an international physics conference in Takayama, Japan, could help explain baffling puzzles about the nature of matter and the formation of the universe after the Big Bang. The discovery was the result of a two year, $100 million experiment by an international team of scientists. Dr. John G. Learned, a University of Hawaii physicist and one of the lead researchers, told United Press International, the discovery means neutrinos may account for the many gravitational forces apparent in astronomical observations that no one has ever been able to explain. ``This will go down as perhaps the one most important discovery in science in the decade,'' he said Thursday. ``It means that neutrinos are surely one of the more massive components of the universe.'' Dr. David Casper, a University of California-Irvine physicist and another team member, agreed, asserting the finding will help scientists understand ``how galaxies and other large scale structures in the universe interact gravitationally.'' Until now, he said, scientists have been puzzled about the movements of the heavens, knowing that something was missing from their calculations, and describing the unknown variable as ``dark'' or ``missing'' matter. This discovery, Learned said, suggests that neutrinos have an aggregate gravitational influence that may eventually be sufficient to reverse the universal expansion triggered by the Big Bang and cause a ``Big Crunch.'' ``The discovery of neutrino mass is intimately connected with both the origins and ultimate fate of the universe,'' Casper said. ``We suspected but did not know that neutrinos had tiny mass. We didn't think of them as making up a part of our world, but in fact, the universe is full of neutrinos. Every cubic centimeter of the universe has about 200 or so neutrinos, which are left over from the Big Bang.'' The finding may also fill in the blanks in equations aimed at solving how particles acquire mass, ``one of the deepest unsolved questions of particle physics,'' Casper said. ``This will help astronomers understand something that puzzles them greatly _ why is there more gravitational force than they expect from the amount of stuff the can see out there,'' Casper added. Learned says neutrinos, until now thought to have no mass, may on the whole turn out to make up ``most of the mass of the universe. '' The discovery was made at Super-Kamiokande Observatory, the world's largest elementary particle detector, northwest of Tokyo. Scientists from 23 institutions in the United States, Japan, Poland and Korea took part. The team included Dr. Henry Sobel, also of UC-Irvine. Neutrinos, similar to electrons, have long been known to be a fundamental constituent of nature. But unlike electrons, neutrinos carry no electric charge, and thus can pass unimpeded through great distances in matter. This property, along with their invisibility, has made them extremely difficult to observe. Scientists have suspected for years that neutrinos might have a very small, but non-zero, mass, but never before could prove it. Casper said the discovery won't ``change the life of the average Joe'' but has profound implications for physicists and astrophysicsts. The finding also suggests, he said, that the gravitational influence of neutrinos may have been a catalyst for the collapse of the diffuse primordial gas into more dense regions that eventually spawned galaxies, stars and planets. UC-Irvine issued a statement on behalf of its scientists asserting that the experiment had yielded ``results that are outside the standard theory of particle physics, which describes the fundamental constituents of matter and their interactions. Until now, there has been no firm evidence that neutrinos possess mass.'' The evidence was based upon studies of neutrinos created when cosmic rays bombard the Earth's upper atmosphere, producing storms of secndary particles that rain down constantly from the heavens. Most neutrinos pass through the entire planet unscathed, but have been detected passing through the Super-Kamiokande group's 50,000-ton tank of purified water 1,000 meters beneath the surface. The scientists noticed the neutrinos oscillated, or changed from one type of neutrino to another, something that could occur only if they have mass. They say in a joint statement that neutrinos ``must now be incorporated into the theoretical models of the structure of matter and that astrophysicists concerned with finding the 'missing' or 'dark matter' in the universe must now consider the neutrino as a serious candidate.'' Neutrinos were created in vast quantities in the first instants after the Big Bang and permeate the universe, Casper said. ``Because these leftover neutrinos are everywhere, even if they have a tiny mass, when you add them up, it adds up to something significant in terms of how galaxies and large scale structures in the universe gravitationally interact,'' Casper said. ``You have a zillion things which by themselves have almost no mass, but when you add them all up, they can have a large scale. This may now guide theorists in answering the big question _ why does everything have mass?'' Learned said, ``this is fundamental science on the most basic scale,'' and its practical applications might not become evident for many years. Copyright 1998 by United Press International All rights reserved Respectively, President, Thomas Clark Radiation Health Foundation (RHF) Inc., RHF Business web site at: http://www.rhfweb.com/ Personal website at http://www.rhfweb.com/personal New Age Media Productions at http://www.rhfweb.com/newage Email: tom rhfweb.com ------=_NextPart_000_0010_01C0F117.52B83680 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Th= omas,

 

Gr= avity is a force not a particle. Gravity is the weakest force in the universe. = Gravity can exert its force over long distances at the speed of light. Gravity = is the only attractive force that has no known particle associated with it. =

 

Wh= en the particle is found that generates the field that causes gravity and = inertia ( the two are equal ) then science will unify all known = forces.

 

Ne= utrinos have very little interaction with matter, however there is many of them. = If they even have a little mass, then they would have a large effect of a source = of mass on the structure of the universe, but still not have any effect on = us beings of matter.

 

Ev= en the dense core of a Neutron star is essentially transparent to = neutrino’s.

 

On= ly a Black hole would have an effect on a neutrino with a 100% probability, = because of the curvature of space is less than one. Thus a neutrino is treated = like any Speed of light particle and prevented from escapeing the event horizion. = If you could create a beam of any speed of light particle and beam it at a = black hole, nothing would come out, not even the wispy = neutrino.

 

Th= e worlds most sensitive Neutrino observatory in Japan detected less than 10 = neutrino events from the 1986a supernova, a galaxy away, even though trillions = per square inch per second sleeted through our = galaxy.

 

Ne= utrino’s may have mass, which means enough of them exert a gravitational force, = but they would be just like any other matter with gravitational = force.

 

So= what is the property of Mass, and why would different aspects of mass like = inertial mass=3Dgravitational mass.

Th= at is still the unknown, and will be till we have a partical acceleration = system powerful enough, or a computing system powerful enough on existing = accelerators to detect the fields and particals that give matter mass and = gravity.

 

Do= a search on the Higgs particle and the Higgs Field, and you will see = that.

 

Al= so consider that even though the mind may be powerful enough to visualize = physics like Stephen Hawking, your electrical fields that your brain creates are several orders of magnitude less than what is required to influence = matter around it.

 

Co= nsider, everything you do is an interaction with the strongest force in the = universe.

Matthew = Rogers

Prove it..

<= span class=3DEmailStyle18> 

-----Original Message-----
From: ConexTom aol.com [mailto:ConexTom aol.com]
Sent: Saturday, June 02, = 2001 7:46 PM
To: vortex-l eskimo.com; = DEACH topica.com
Cc: tom rhfweb.com
Subject: Fwd: Candidate = for universal gravitational glue

 

Subj: Fw: Candidate for universal gravitational = glue
Date: 6/2/01 11:41:42 AM Pacific Daylight Time
From:    = etimes teleport.com (Bruce Meland)
To:    tom rhfweb.com
CC:    conextom aol.com

Hi Tom I believe some form of these neutrinos are the gravity particles. = Bruce


Candidate for universal gravitational glue


UPI Science = News Thursday June 4 9:34 PM EDT TAKAYAMA, Japan, June 5 (UPI) -
Researchers say they have identifed what may be the unseen gravitational = glue
_ the so-called dark matter responsible in part for the evolution of the =
universe from the moment of its birth: neutrinos. A serious candidate = for
this glue, neutrinos are invisible, sub- atomic particles, created at = the
time of the Big Bang, that stream through the Earth, people and = everything
else unfettered. The groundbreaking discovery, announced Friday in Japan = by
an international team of scientists, was that neutrinos have mass. = Because
the particles fill the universe, scientists say, collectively they may = have
the force to reverse its expansive course to cause the ``Big Crunch.'' = So
fundamental a discovery, they said at Neutrino '98, an international = physics
conference in Takayama, Japan, could help explain baffling puzzles about = the
nature of matter and the formation of the universe after the Big Bang. = The
discovery was the result of a two year, $100 million experiment by an =
international team of scientists. Dr. John G. Learned, a University of = Hawaii
physicist and one of the lead researchers, told United Press = International,
the discovery means neutrinos may account for the many gravitational = forces
apparent in astronomical observations that no one has ever been able to =
explain. ``This will go down as perhaps the one most important discovery = in
science in the decade,'' he said Thursday. ``It means that neutrinos are =
surely one of the more massive components of the universe.'' Dr. David =
Casper, a University of California-Irvine physicist and another team = member,
agreed, asserting the finding will help scientists understand ``how = galaxies
and other large scale structures in the universe interact = gravitationally.''
Until now, he said, scientists have been puzzled about the movements of = the
heavens, knowing that something was missing from their calculations, and =
describing the unknown variable as ``dark'' or ``missing'' matter. This =
discovery, Learned said, suggests that neutrinos have an aggregate
gravitational influence that may eventually be sufficient to reverse the =
universal expansion triggered by the Big Bang and cause a ``Big = Crunch.''
``The discovery of neutrino mass is intimately connected with both the =
origins and ultimate fate of the universe,'' Casper said. ``We suspected = but
did not know that neutrinos had tiny mass. We didn't think of them as = making
up a part of our world, but in fact, the universe is full of neutrinos. = Every
cubic centimeter of the universe has about 200 or so neutrinos, which = are
left over from the Big Bang.'' The finding may also fill in the blanks = in
equations aimed at solving how particles acquire mass, ``one of the = deepest
unsolved questions of particle physics,'' Casper said. ``This will help =
astronomers understand something that puzzles them greatly _ why is = there
more gravitational force than they expect from the amount of stuff the = can
see out there,'' Casper added. Learned says neutrinos, until now thought = to
have no mass, may on the whole turn out to make up ``most of the mass of = the
universe. '' The discovery was made at Super-Kamiokande Observatory, the =
world's largest elementary particle detector, northwest of Tokyo. = Scientists
from 23 institutions in the United States, Japan, Poland and Korea took = part.
The team included Dr. Henry Sobel, also of UC-Irvine. Neutrinos, similar = to
electrons, have long been known to be a fundamental constituent of = nature.
But unlike electrons, neutrinos carry no electric charge, and thus can = pass
unimpeded through great distances in matter. This property, along with = their
invisibility, has made them extremely difficult to observe. Scientists = have
suspected for years that neutrinos might have a very small, but = non-zero,
mass, but never before could prove it. Casper said the discovery won't =
``change the life of the average Joe'' but has profound implications for =
physicists and astrophysicsts. The finding also suggests, he said, that = the
gravitational influence of neutrinos may have been a catalyst for the =
collapse of the diffuse primordial gas into more dense regions that
eventually spawned galaxies, stars and planets. UC-Irvine issued a = statement
on behalf of its scientists asserting that the experiment had yielded =
``results that are outside the standard theory of particle physics, = which
describes the fundamental constituents of matter and their interactions. =
Until now, there has been no firm evidence that neutrinos possess = mass.'' The
evidence was based upon studies of neutrinos created when cosmic rays = bombard
the Earth's upper atmosphere, producing storms of secndary particles = that
rain down constantly from the heavens. Most neutrinos pass through the = entire
planet unscathed, but have been detected passing through the = Super-Kamiokande
group's 50,000-ton tank of purified water 1,000 meters beneath the = surface.
The scientists noticed the neutrinos oscillated, or changed from one = type of
neutrino to another, something that could occur only if they have mass. = They
say in a joint statement that neutrinos ``must now be incorporated into = the
theoretical models of the structure of matter and that astrophysicists =
concerned with finding the 'missing' or 'dark matter' in the universe = must
now consider the neutrino as a serious candidate.'' Neutrinos were = created in
vast quantities in the first instants after the Big Bang and permeate = the
universe, Casper said. ``Because these leftover neutrinos are = everywhere,
even if they have a tiny mass, when you add them up, it adds up to = something
significant in terms of how galaxies and large scale structures in the =
universe gravitationally interact,'' Casper said. ``You have a zillion = things
which by themselves have almost no mass, but when you add them all up, = they
can have a large scale. This may now guide theorists in answering the = big
question _ why does everything have mass?'' Learned said, ``this is
fundamental science on the most basic scale,'' and its practical = applications
might not become evident for many years. Copyright 1998 by United Press =
International All rights reserved

Respectively,

President, Thomas Clark
Radiation Health Foundation (RHF) Inc.,
RHF Business web site at: http://www.rhfweb.com/
Personal website at http://www.rhfweb.com/personal
New Age Media Productions at
http://www.rhfweb.com/newage =
Email: tom@rhfweb.com =

------=_NextPart_000_0010_01C0F117.52B83680-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Jun 9 20:09:06 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id UAA01048; Sat, 9 Jun 2001 20:08:39 -0700 Resent-Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2001 20:08:39 -0700 Message-ID: <013501c0f151$eb283660$e2b4bfa8 computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: Subject: The official U.S. time - clock Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2001 21:05:53 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000A_01C0F127.F8C2ABE0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Resent-Message-ID: <"T2Mvn2.0.EG.tIk8x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43060 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_000A_01C0F127.F8C2ABE0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit http://nist.time.gov/timezone.cgi?Mountain/d/-7/java ------=_NextPart_000_000A_01C0F127.F8C2ABE0 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="The official U.S. time - clock.url" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="The official U.S. time - clock.url" [DEFAULT] BASEURL=http://nist.time.gov/timezone.cgi?Mountain/d/-7/java [InternetShortcut] URL=http://nist.time.gov/timezone.cgi?Mountain/d/-7/java Modified=60707FCD51F1C0011F ------=_NextPart_000_000A_01C0F127.F8C2ABE0-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Jun 9 21:06:41 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id VAA15603; Sat, 9 Jun 2001 21:05:48 -0700 Resent-Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2001 21:05:48 -0700 X-Apparently-From: Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.20010609230806.00983650 postoffice.swbell.net> X-Sender: cjford1 pop.mail.yahoo.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58 Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2001 23:08:39 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Charles Ford Subject: Re: The official U.S. time - clock In-Reply-To: <013501c0f151$eb283660$e2b4bfa8 computer> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <"Vi8TW3.0.gp3.R8l8x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43061 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 09:05 PM 6/9/01 -0500, you wrote: > http://nist.time.gov/timezone.cgi?Mountain/d/-7/java Cool... but I just use the one they set this one with http://tycho.usno.navy.mil/cgi-bin/anim _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Jun 10 02:06:02 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id CAA06005; Sun, 10 Jun 2001 02:04:19 -0700 Resent-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 02:04:19 -0700 Message-ID: <014701c0f183$98d85ca0$e2b4bfa8 computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: Cc: Subject: Re: Mercury Arc Space Drive? Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 03:00:19 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Resent-Message-ID: <"PlCKc1.0.hT1.JWp8x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43062 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: According to some very astute calculations a Mercury Arc Discharge( Cesium or Xenon will work too) can work as a space drive without expelling any propellant. This comes about because the slow moving heavy positive ion, M+, striking the cathode have as much as 600 times the momentum as the stripped electron, e- striking the anode: mv = m(2Vq/m)^1/2 With about 20 volts 750 amperes (15 Kwe) 4.45 newtons (1.0 lb) of thrust can be obtained. OTOH, I won't believe it until I see it fly. :-) Regards, Frederick From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Jun 10 03:50:15 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id DAA20902; Sun, 10 Jun 2001 03:49:43 -0700 Resent-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 03:49:43 -0700 Message-ID: <016901c0f192$547a6300$e2b4bfa8 computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: Cc: References: <014701c0f183$98d85ca0$e2b4bfa8 computer> <03f6itgke0ikf1lki5al9abf2qguoel4uq@4ax.com> Subject: Re: Mercury Arc Space Drive? Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 04:47:02 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Resent-Message-ID: <"L_65B3.0.W65.73r8x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43063 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Just in case experiment for unsure skeptics: Use two ~1/4 inch diameter tungsten welding rods tightly inserted in a quartz or ceramic tube (~1.0 mm gap) with a small drop of Hg or Cs contacting them in the gap , so that the drop vaporizes when the voltage (24 volts D.C.) is applied with the negative side up. If it levitates... :-) Regards, Frederick From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Jun 10 07:07:06 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id HAA19044; Sun, 10 Jun 2001 07:06:31 -0700 Resent-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 07:06:31 -0700 Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 07:04:45 -0700 From: Jones Beene Subject: Re: Any questions?? To: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-to: jonesb9 pacbell.net Message-id: <0GEP009EYWIHU2 mta6.snfc21.pbi.net> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Opera 5.11 build 904 Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Resent-Message-ID: <"mwogL.0.Kf4.cxt8x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43064 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Hi Chris, I looked at the patent application that you have cited on you web page but found it difficult to envision what is going on. Could you please explain how the device operates and particularly how the rotating element fits into the scheme. Is the principal of operation the plasma focus? Does the sphere provice a convergence zone. Thanks in advance, Jones From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Jun 10 08:13:52 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id IAA05924; Sun, 10 Jun 2001 08:13:17 -0700 Resent-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 08:13:17 -0700 Message-ID: <002501c0f1c0$592844c0$a81e80d9 pavilion> Reply-To: "Pierre.CLAUZON" From: "Pierre.CLAUZON" To: References: Subject: Re: Any questions?? Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 17:16:33 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 Resent-Message-ID: <"7MC041.0.US1.Dwu8x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43065 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Hi Chris, I would be very pleased to be astonished by your invention MICRO PLASMA FUSION. Could you send us more details, views of your apparatus, schemes ... and , of course, your first experimental results. Thanks in advance So long PPC ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2001 3:53 AM Subject: Any questions?? From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Jun 10 10:51:00 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id KAA16092; Sun, 10 Jun 2001 10:50:26 -0700 Resent-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 10:50:26 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <5.0.0.25.0.20010607203737.020dbb30 pop.infi-net.mindspring.com> References: <5.0.0.25.0.20010607203737.020dbb30 pop.infi-net.mindspring.com> Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 12:50:52 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: thomas malloy Subject: Re: OFF TOPIC Re: A parable for Bruce Meland Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Resent-Message-ID: <"pn-_f1.0.Kx3.XDx8x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43066 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Friday evening To whom ever posted this; >>Many moons ago, I had the experience of working with a Born >>Again Christian. You know the type. Anyway, he kept trying >>to convert the heathens in the office to the one true faith. >>One day, the following exchange took place. In answer to your question. We have to share our faith so that everyone has the opportunity to make a decision. Why? Well then time as we know it will end, and the earth can be cleansed of sin, by being melted with fire. I've made my decision. I want to be on the winning side, and I'm betting that I am. Wishing all my fellow Vortexians a Shabbot Shalom, Sabbath day peace. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Jun 10 10:51:02 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id KAA16157; Sun, 10 Jun 2001 10:50:38 -0700 Resent-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 10:50:38 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <000f01c0f151$ff170e80$a2962640 bear> References: <000f01c0f151$ff170e80$a2962640 bear> Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 12:50:52 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: thomas malloy Subject: RE: Candidate for universal gravitational glue Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Resent-Message-ID: <"hLa0M2.0.Jy3.kDx8x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43067 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: RE: Candidate for universal gravitational glue
Thomas,
 
Gravity is a force not a particle.

Hum, did you see my posting on the Gravitron conference? They seem to think that gravity is manifested in the form of a particle.


When the particle is found that generates the field that causes gravity and inertia ( the two are equal ) then science will unify all known forces.

I assume that is what the Japanese researchers who are sponsoring the conference have in mind.

Neutrinos have very little interaction with matter, however there is many of them. If they even have a little mass, then they would have a large effect of a source of mass on the structure of the universe, but still not have any effect on us beings of matter.

The question is how can matter have an effect on neutrions? If they could be captured and changed into energy,


 
The worlds most sensitive Neutrino observatory in Japan detected less than 10 neutrino events from the 1986a supernova, a galaxy away, even though trillions per square inch per second sleeted through our galaxy.

How do you know there are trillions? if you can't detect them?

 
Neutrino's may have mass, which means enough of them exert a gravitational force, but they would be just like any other matter with gravitational force.

considering your previous writing, this would seeem to be contradictory

Do a search on the Higgs particle and the Higgs Field, and you will see that.

The last I heard, they were still looking for the Higgs Boson, did I miss something?

 
Also consider that even though the mind may be powerful enough to visualize physics like Stephen Hawking, your electrical fields that your brain creates are several orders of magnitude less than what is required to influence matter around it.

Have you ever heard of spoon bending? I'd say that this is a classic example of theory conflicting with observed fact.


Email: tom rhfweb.com

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Jun 10 10:51:12 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id KAA16190; Sun, 10 Jun 2001 10:50:44 -0700 Resent-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 10:50:44 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 12:50:52 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: thomas malloy Subject: Re: Any questions?? Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Resent-Message-ID: <"VibLv.0.qy3.pDx8x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43068 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: >Group, > >I was asked to join this elist that I might answer questions about my >invention, its strange properties, Micro Plasma Fusion or a better >description of my Magnetic Vortex Theory - I'm interested in your results. Have you read Ken Shoulders' electron macrocluster patents? How are you generating these magnetic vortexes? >and no one questions me. Did you notice my posting on the curl free magnetic potential vector? I'm still looking for an explanation of this wave. I believe that this is the same wave generated by Ahronhoff and Bohm in their experiment, see Physical Review 1959. This wave is also described in the patents of Gelinas, and in Hal Puthoff's patent. > >Chris Arnold From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Jun 10 10:59:13 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id KAA20379; Sun, 10 Jun 2001 10:58:42 -0700 Resent-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 10:58:42 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Sender: mjones pop.jump.net Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <014701c0f183$98d85ca0$e2b4bfa8 computer> Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 12:56:16 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Mitchell Jones Subject: Re: Mercury Arc Space Drive? Resent-Message-ID: <"KAs-3.0.L-4.ILx8x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43069 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: >According to some very astute calculations a Mercury Arc Discharge( Cesium >or Xenon >will work too) can work as a space drive without expelling any propellant. > >This comes about because the slow moving heavy positive ion, M+, striking >the cathode >have as much as 600 times >the momentum as the stripped electron, e- striking the anode: > >mv = m(2Vq/m)^1/2 > >With about 20 volts 750 amperes (15 Kwe) 4.45 newtons (1.0 lb) of thrust >can be >obtained. ***{In order for the positive ion to acquire that momentum, it must first be repelled away from the anode and then attracted to the cathode--which means: for every increment to the momentum of the positive ion, the anode and/or cathode must acquire equal momentum in the opposite direction. Result: there is no net change in the momentum of the system. --MJ}*** >OTOH, I won't believe it until I see it fly. :-) > >Regards, Frederick ________________ Quote of the month: "Always strive to be accurate, even when it doesn't matter, so that you can be accurate when it does matter." --Jude Acers From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Jun 10 11:53:24 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id LAA04090; Sun, 10 Jun 2001 11:53:06 -0700 Resent-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 11:53:06 -0700 Message-ID: <005501c0f1dd$069701c0$cb3dee3f default> From: "Nick Reiter" To: References: <5.0.0.25.0.20010607203737.020dbb30 pop.infi-net.mindspring.com> Subject: Bill Beaty? Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 14:41:54 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 Resent-Message-ID: <"sFwQv2.0.p_.H8y8x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43070 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: A I think Charlie Ford's point is of high importance here - is everything OK with our venerable benefactor and guru, Bill B? NR From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Jun 10 12:19:26 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id MAA13147; Sun, 10 Jun 2001 12:18:47 -0700 Resent-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 12:18:47 -0700 Message-ID: <018f01c0f1d9$72a6b8a0$e2b4bfa8 computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: Subject: Re: Mercury Arc Space Drive? Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 13:15:50 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0005_01C0F1AF.78CAC7A0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Resent-Message-ID: <"71eKL3.0.LD3.NWy8x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43071 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C0F1AF.78CAC7A0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Some relevant arc info. Note Hazard of Thoriated Tungsten Welding Rods. FJS http://www.liquidarc.com.au/gtaw/html/electrodSection_2fundamentals.html ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C0F1AF.78CAC7A0 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="electrodSection_2fundamentals.html.url" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="electrodSection_2fundamentals.html.url" [DEFAULT] BASEURL=http://www.liquidarc.com.au/gtaw/html/electrodSection_2fundamentals.html [DOC#3#4] BASEURL=http://www.liquidarc.com.au/gtaw/html/top_frame_fundamentals.html ORIGURL=./top_frame_fundamentals.html [DOC#3#5#6] BASEURL=http://www.liquidarc.com.au/gtaw/html/left_frame_fundamentals.html ORIGURL=./left_frame_fundamentals.html [DOC#3#5#7] BASEURL=http://www.liquidarc.com.au/gtaw/html/section_2_fundamentals.html#Electrodes ORIGURL=./section_2_fundamentals.html#Electrodes [InternetShortcut] URL=http://www.liquidarc.com.au/gtaw/html/electrodSection_2fundamentals.html Modified=A0C2FEEDD8F1C001D7 ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C0F1AF.78CAC7A0-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Jun 10 12:27:56 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id MAA16484; Sun, 10 Jun 2001 12:27:22 -0700 Resent-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 12:27:22 -0700 Message-ID: <019501c0f1da$a453e520$e2b4bfa8 computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: Cc: References: Subject: Re: Mercury Arc Space Drive? Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 13:24:44 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Resent-Message-ID: <"Eq4R23.0.P14.Qey8x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43072 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mitchell Jones" To: Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2001 12:56 PM Subject: Re: Mercury Arc Space Drive? Mitchell Jones wrote: > Frederick Sparber wrote: > >According to some very astute calculations a Mercury Arc Discharge( Cesium > >or Xenon > >will work too) can work as a space drive without expelling any propellant. > > > >This comes about because the slow moving heavy positive ion, M+, striking > >the cathode > >have as much as 600 times > >the momentum as the stripped electron, e- striking the anode: > > > >mv = m(2Vq/m)^1/2 > > > >With about 20 volts 750 amperes (15 Kwe) 4.45 newtons (1.0 lb) of thrust > >can be > >obtained. > > ***{In order for the positive ion to acquire that momentum, it must first > be repelled away from the anode and then attracted to the cathode--which > means: for every increment to the momentum of the positive ion, the anode > and/or cathode must acquire equal momentum in the opposite direction. > Result: there is no net change in the momentum of the system. --MJ}*** That is the intuitive take, but sometime past I was informed of a "Cathode Drag Effect" in an electrical discharge. Time to check it out. IOW the arc discharge produces a reflecion of the impacting ion (possibly neutralized at the cathode surface) thus a net force on the cathode. Regards, Frederick > > >OTOH, I won't believe it until I see it fly. :-) > > > >Regards, Frederick > > ________________ > Quote of the month: > > "Always strive to be accurate, even when it doesn't matter, so that you can > be accurate when it does matter." --Jude Acers > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Jun 10 14:15:40 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id OAA14416; Sun, 10 Jun 2001 14:13:30 -0700 Resent-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 14:13:30 -0700 From: Hypercom59 aol.com Message-ID: <51.cc63e04.28553cd4 aol.com> Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 17:12:52 EDT Subject: Re: Any questions?? To: vortex-l eskimo.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows 95 sub 120 Resent-Message-ID: <"MWfKY1.0.zW3.vB-8x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43073 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Thomas Malloy writes, I am very familiar with electrons and Kens work. Under site link 8, I explain why Ken gets his unexplained EV "hole" phenomena in the foil target. The vortex is created by the electrons, not me or you. The magnetic vortex is the form that magnetism takes upon its creation. Under site link 5, "Magnetism can be understood" I clearly define how the vortex is created and that it is this vortex energy that is responsible for magnetism. I have no idea what wave you are referring to - I know basically 2 things, my device and magnetism (which is not a wave). Magnetism is not curl free, so I cant help you. Chris From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Jun 10 16:15:49 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id QAA19681; Sun, 10 Jun 2001 16:15:12 -0700 Resent-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 16:15:12 -0700 From: Standing Bear To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Mercury Arc Space Drive? Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 19:19:45 -0700 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.1.99] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01061019194501.00881 linux> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id QAA19657 Resent-Message-ID: <"WWWd9.0.Np4._z_8x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43074 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: On Sunday 10 June 2001 10:56, Mitchell Jones wrote: > >According to some very astute calculations a Mercury Arc Discharge( Cesium > >or Xenon > >will work too) can work as a space drive without expelling any propellant. > > > >This comes about because the slow moving heavy positive ion, M+, striking > >the cathode > >have as much as 600 times > >the momentum as the stripped electron, e- striking the anode: > > > >mv = m(2Vq/m)^1/2 > > > >With about 20 volts 750 amperes (15 Kwe) 4.45 newtons (1.0 lb) of thrust > >can be > >obtained. > > ***{In order for the positive ion to acquire that momentum, it must first > be repelled away from the anode and then attracted to the cathode--which > means: for every increment to the momentum of the positive ion, the anode > and/or cathode must acquire equal momentum in the opposite direction. > Result: there is no net change in the momentum of the system. --MJ}*** > Hold it McGee, not so fast! Electrical forces are causing the momentum changes, so the system is trading electrical energy for mechanical energy. The accelerating force mechanical probably stands. Standing Bear ps now the real trouble seems to be efficiency. 700amps at 24 volts is an awful lot of power to spend for one steeeenkin pound of thrust. Personally I would rather see the energy spent on ionic drives. You can collect the ions in interplanetary space with a large enough collector and enough speed.. Bear with me > >OTOH, I won't believe it until I see it fly. :-) > > > >Regards, Frederick > > ________________ > Quote of the month: > > "Always strive to be accurate, even when it doesn't matter, so that you can > be accurate when it does matter." --Jude Acers From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Jun 10 18:05:55 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id SAA20183; Sun, 10 Jun 2001 18:05:21 -0700 Resent-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 18:05:21 -0700 Message-ID: <01df01c0f209$daebfc60$e2b4bfa8 computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: Cc: Subject: Re: Mercury Arc Space Drive? Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 19:02:14 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0005_01C0F1DF.DD2BA540" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Resent-Message-ID: <"NhAOo2.0.Dx4.Gb19x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43075 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C0F1DF.DD2BA540 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Standing Bear. Please note that these Ion Drive units require ~ 28 Kwe/newton thrust or ~124 Kwe/lb thrust. 601 18 millinewton thrust, 500 watts 702 165 millinewton thrust 4,500 watts At 30 km/sec the Xe ions are going through ~ 620 volts accelerating potential, thus the 601 is working at ~ 0.8 ampere (~1.1E-6 kg/sec of Xe plus losses) or ~ 0.1 kg/day of Xe plus losses. http://www.hsc.com/factsheets/xips/xips.html Regards, Frederick ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C0F1DF.DD2BA540 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="Fact Sheet - Xenon Ion Propulsion.url" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="Fact Sheet - Xenon Ion Propulsion.url" [DEFAULT] BASEURL=http://www.hsc.com/factsheets/xips/xips.html [InternetShortcut] URL=http://www.hsc.com/factsheets/xips/xips.html Modified=2077CAA106F2C001BB ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C0F1DF.DD2BA540-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Jun 10 20:04:12 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id UAA23533; Sun, 10 Jun 2001 20:03:22 -0700 Resent-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 20:03:22 -0700 Reply-To: From: "Keith Nagel" To: Subject: RE: Bill Beaty? Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 23:09:22 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 In-Reply-To: <005501c0f1dd$069701c0$cb3dee3f default> Importance: Normal Resent-Message-ID: <"o80DJ3.0.dl5.wJ39x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43076 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Hi. I'd guess he's down in Dallas partying with the Keelynet crew. He's about due for a vacation... If folks are really concerned they should email Jerry Decker and ask, likely he's sipping margaritas by the pool and contemplating the benefits of his new found single-hood. Those southern girls can be very charming. K. -----Original Message----- From: Nick Reiter [mailto:reit ezworks.net] Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2001 2:42 PM To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Bill Beaty? I think Charlie Ford's point is of high importance here - is everything OK with our venerable benefactor and guru, Bill B? NR From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Jun 10 21:45:15 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id VAA24612; Sun, 10 Jun 2001 21:43:50 -0700 Resent-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 21:43:50 -0700 Reply-To: From: "Keith Nagel" To: Subject: RE: OFF TOPIC Re: A parable for Bruce Meland Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 00:49:48 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal Resent-Message-ID: <"-4GQz3.0.O06.5o49x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43078 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Hi Tom. Yeah, but a few billion of us actually LIKE living here, and don't really want to see the whole thing go up in flames. So please, if you guys get close to success, tell me so we can get off the planet before ya melt it. Life is good. Enjoy it. If you're looking for some great message from the Creator, well, that's it. K. -----Original Message----- From: thomas malloy [mailto:temalloy metro.lakes.com] Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2001 1:51 PM To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: OFF TOPIC Re: A parable for Bruce Meland Friday evening To whom ever posted this; >>Many moons ago, I had the experience of working with a Born >>Again Christian. You know the type. Anyway, he kept trying >>to convert the heathens in the office to the one true faith. >>One day, the following exchange took place. In answer to your question. We have to share our faith so that everyone has the opportunity to make a decision. Why? Well then time as we know it will end, and the earth can be cleansed of sin, by being melted with fire. I've made my decision. I want to be on the winning side, and I'm betting that I am. Wishing all my fellow Vortexians a Shabbot Shalom, Sabbath day peace. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Jun 10 21:45:22 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id VAA24559; Sun, 10 Jun 2001 21:43:43 -0700 Resent-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 21:43:43 -0700 Reply-To: From: "Keith Nagel" To: Subject: RE: Mercury Arc Space Drive? Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 00:49:42 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 In-Reply-To: <016901c0f192$547a6300$e2b4bfa8 computer> Importance: Normal Resent-Message-ID: <"mOPhx.0.f_5._n49x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43077 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Hi Fred. OK, I've done my share of experimenting with mercury ignitrons. Is this something like what you have in mind? I'll say, when you push a 1000 amps or so thru one they make quite a pop, but I haven't seen one take off yet. Any suggestions for testing here? I happen to have one with all the driver circuitry set up, so go ahead... K. -----Original Message----- From: Frederick Sparber [mailto:fjsparber earthlink.net] Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2001 5:47 AM To: vortex-l eskimo.com Cc: jlsparber earthlink.net Subject: Re: Mercury Arc Space Drive? Just in case experiment for unsure skeptics: Use two ~1/4 inch diameter tungsten welding rods tightly inserted in a quartz or ceramic tube (~1.0 mm gap) with a small drop of Hg or Cs contacting them in the gap , so that the drop vaporizes when the voltage (24 volts D.C.) is applied with the negative side up. If it levitates... :-) Regards, Frederick From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 11 04:50:12 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id EAA20339; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 04:49:45 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 04:49:45 -0700 Message-ID: <020601c0f263$e1781000$e2b4bfa8 computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: Cc: References: Subject: Re: Mercury Arc Space Drive? Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 05:47:07 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Resent-Message-ID: <"TGTqH2.0.jz4.O1B9x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43079 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: ----- Original Message ----- From: "Keith Nagel" To: Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2001 11:49 PM Subject: RE: Mercury Arc Space Drive? Hi Keith. If you can get one to take off with the cathode down, that would really be something! :-) Frederick > Hi Fred. > > OK, I've done my share of experimenting with mercury > ignitrons. Is this something like what you have in mind? > I'll say, when you push a 1000 amps or so thru one > they make quite a pop, but I haven't seen one take > off yet. Any suggestions for testing here? I happen to > have one with all the driver circuitry set up, so > go ahead... > > K. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Frederick Sparber [mailto:fjsparber earthlink.net] > Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2001 5:47 AM > To: vortex-l eskimo.com > Cc: jlsparber earthlink.net > Subject: Re: Mercury Arc Space Drive? > > > Just in case experiment for unsure skeptics: > > Use two ~1/4 inch diameter tungsten welding rods tightly inserted in a > quartz or > ceramic tube (~1.0 mm gap) with a small drop of Hg or Cs contacting them in > the gap , > so that the drop vaporizes when the voltage (24 volts D.C.) is applied with > the > negative side up. > > If it levitates... :-) > > Regards, Frederick > > > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 11 07:50:35 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id HAA32342; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 07:49:44 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 07:49:44 -0700 Message-ID: <3B24DA92.CCE58B4D bellsouth.net> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 10:49:54 -0400 From: Terry Blanton X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Aquino info on Anti Gravity - Meland Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"GMQrZ.0.Cv7.7gD9x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43080 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Gnorts, Vorts, It is interesting to compare Chris Hardeman's antigravity device at: http://www.icnet.net/users/chrish/Test.htm to George Adamski's most famous UFO photo at: http://www.ufobbs.com/pics1/adamski3.html Thoses spheres have just gotta be a coincidence, eh? Terry From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 11 08:47:12 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id IAA19820; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 08:45:49 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 08:45:49 -0700 Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20010611111201.00a90768 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 11:45:26 -0400 To: vortex-l eskimo.com, From: Jed Rothwell Subject: Hyrogen fuel economics In-Reply-To: <008f01c0f07b$8d3861a0$e2b4bfa8 computer> References: <5.0.2.1.2.20010608173552.02982b20 pop.mindspring.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <"nm0Lg.0.cr4.iUE9x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43081 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Frederick Sparber wrote: > No one is suggesting that automobile hydrogen fuel should be produced by > > present-day chemical methods. All studies advocate deriving hydrogen from > > solar or wind power. There is more than enough wind power to accomplish > this. > >At what cost Jed? It takes 25 Kw-Hr per pound of Hydrogen produced. At >$.10/ kw-hr >and 55,000 btu/lb >heat of combustion for H2 you are getting close to $2.50 >for the energy equivalent of a gallon of gasoline or diesel. Cost is the problem, but I do not think it is as high as you estimate. I have a dated but detailed and authoritative source here: "Hydrogen Program Plan, FY 1993 - 1997," DoE, NREL, published 1993. This does not include estimates for wind power, which has become much more cost effective than people predicted in 1992. Anyway, p. 23 shows the efficiency, capital cost and emissions for a variety of systems, both conventional and hydrogen. It is a little difficult to compare cost per gallon equivalent, because the main expense is for capital equipment, and it is hard to say how long the equipment lasts. A "direct solar to hydrogen" facility that costs $21,100 per kWh is more expensive than a fossil fuel plant at $3,200 per kWh, but it might last much longer, and of course there is no fuel cost over the life of the plant. Some examples: CURRENT TECHNOLOGY Crude oil to gasoline ICE (what we have now) 9.5 units of input energy for each unit of propulsion energy delivered 8.5 thousand dollars per kilowatt capital cost 2.4 kg CO2/kWh 4.2 grams NOx/kWh Photovoltaics to hydrogen 25.9 units input energy 71.4 thousand dollars/kWh (no pollution) Fossil fuels, electricity, battery electric car 5.1 units input energy 3.2 thousand dollars/kWh -- seems high, but they include distribution network cost 1.6 kg CO2/kWh 4.4 g NOx/kWh 11.8 g SO2/kWh Natural Gas 11.2 units input energy 0.5 thousand dollars/kWh 1.3 kg CO2/kWh 4.0 g NOx/kWh ADVANCED Coal gasification 6.3 units input energy 4.0 thousand dollars/kWh 1.8 kg CO2/kWh 3.6 g NOx/kWh Direct solar 4.1 units input energy 21.1 thousand dollars/kWh (no pollution) Biomass to hydrogen 6.8 units input energy 4.4 thousand dollars/kWh (no pollution listed - but I think there is some.) As of 1992, fossil fuel for electric cars was the most efficient and least polluting method of transportation listed here. (Nuclear or hydro power => electric car is not shown.) Anyway, based on the current cost of fossil fuel generators versus wind farms in Montana, I estimate CURRENT technology (in 2001) would look like this: Wind to hydrogen ?? units input energy (but it makes no difference) 6.4 thousand dollars/kWh (no pollution) I am not sure how much it would cost to send the hydrogen gas from Montana to California, but I do not think it would be excessively expensive. It may not make economic sense to send it to the east coast. In many states, with a large number of vehicles, such as Texas and Iowa, the gas would be pumped only short distances, or no distance at all. >Even if you commited all of the hydro and nuclear to hydrogen production >you couldn't come close to meeting the demand. You could not today, but the idea would be to gradually increase power generation and on-site electrolysis, which you phase out oil and coal production. - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 11 08:59:41 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id IAA25855; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 08:59:07 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 08:59:07 -0700 Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20010611115241.0292e9b8 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 11:58:57 -0400 To: vortex-l eskimo.com, From: Jed Rothwell Subject: Hyrogen fuel economics - minor correction Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <"dKQWM1.0.bJ6.AhE9x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43082 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: I wrote: Biomass to hydrogen 6.8 units input energy 4.4 thousand dollars/kWh (no pollution listed - but I think there is some.) Ah, I see. They show some pollution with "Biomass to ethanol" but none with "Biomass to hydrogen." That's reasonable. I said, "In many states, with a large number of vehicles, such as Texas and Iowa, the gas would be pumped only short distances, or no distance at all." I mean they could set up a 1.5 or 2.0 MW windmill in or near a population center, generate the gas, and store it on-site. Automobiles could gas up under the windmills. This could be no more dangerous than today's gas stations. I said, "the idea would be to gradually increase power generation and on-site electrolysis, which you phase out oil and coal production." Meant to say: "while you phase out oil and coal." Coal would be phased out when hydrogen production increased enough to generate electricity at remote sites with fuel cells. This fixes the problem with intermittent wind or solar, by the way. - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 11 09:31:57 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id JAA08158; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 09:30:01 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 09:30:01 -0700 Message-ID: <000101c0f289$2b259ae0$e1181ad8 oemcomputer> From: "Bruce Meland" To: Cc: Subject: Re: Re[2]: Raids and helicopters prove nothing Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 13:22:38 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Resent-Message-ID: <"uN4YL2.0.L_1.98F9x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43083 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Jed Obviously you are not in the loop and have not been following the technology for as long as I have. I can then understand why in your minds eye they don't exist. Bruce -----Original Message----- From: Jed Rothwell To: vortex-l eskimo.com ; vortex-l@eskimo.com Date: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 11:07 AM Subject: Re: Re[2]: Raids and helicopters prove nothing >Bruce Meland wrote: > >> Jed I amd not berating the cold fusion researchers accomplishments but >> if one has a solid state device that converts cosmic energy directly to >> electricity, it is a slam dunk and won't take years and millions of >> dollars for pilot plants. > >That's correct, I am sure. No one disputes that if you had such a device >the rest would follow. However, as far as I know, nobody has such a device, >it is physically impossible to make one. You have not given us any reason >to believe such a machine exists. So there is no point in speculating about >what it might do, or what it would be good for. If I had a machine that >could convert lead into gold, or a machine that could predict the outcome >of the Georgia Lottery, I would be fabulously rich, but I do not, and I am >not, so why speculate about it? > > >>The technology is just too revolutionary and risks energy stock >>portfolios of the high and mighty. > >That's nonsense. Throughout history, countless revolutionary technologies >have destroyed the stock portfolios of the high and mighty. The most recent >example is the microcomputer, which nearly destroyed IBM, and which wiped >out most mainframe and minicomputer companies. Starting in 1900, >automobiles and later airplanes destroyed U.S. railroad passenger >transport, even though the railroads were the most wealthy, politically >powerful, influential, and most feared industry in the world. In 1900 >upstart entrepreneurs like Henry Ford had far less legal protection against >heavy handed, unfair competition than Bill Gates had in 1980, but it did >not stop him from destroying the biggest industry on earth. > >If I had the technology you describe, I would soon be richer than Bill >Gates, and nothing -- no corporation, government or Black Helicopters -- >could stop me, except by killing me. > > >> Just recently Judge Sandra OConor(sp?) >>could not rule on a energy case because she owned stock in the company. > >The name is Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor. You can find that >name with the correct spelling on the Internet in less than two seconds >with a search program Google.com or www.alltheweb.com. Since you are the >editor of Electrifying Times, I suggest you learn to use these search tools >to pin down names and facts. > > >>Also perhaps these divices operate at such high frequencies only black >>budget technology can detect their operation and hence exercise control > >Black budget technology cannot prevent spies in the CIA and the FBI from >selling out and betraying our agents and secret codes. Black budget >agencies such the CIA are so inept they did not predict the fall of the >Soviet Union, or make any arrangements for it. Their high-level million >dollar analyses of Japanese politics, language and culture are a joke. >These reports would be given a failing grade in undergraduate Asian Studies >at any university in the world. They are as ridiculous as the portrayal of >the Imperial Japanese Navy general staff in the movie "Pearl Harbor," which >seems to be based on the wild fantasies of some 13-year-old kid, and which >are played by people who cannot even speak Japanese. (For a reasonably >accurate portrayal of the IJN, see the movie "Tora Tora Tora.") > >The U.S. Federal agencies are so ignorant of basic science, they do not >even understand that cold fusion is real. The high level government people >I have spoken with are so ignorant, they would not recognize a >revolutionary technology if it bit them on the butt. There is not the >slightest chance they have machines that can "detect" the "frequencies" of >energy producing machine, and furthermore that statement has no scientific >or technical meaning. It is nonsense, fantasy and blather. Frankly, all of >your messages seem to be concocted of such blather, so I think I will add >you to my short list of people who are automatically deleted. > >- Jed > > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 11 09:48:39 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id JAA13989; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 09:46:57 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 09:46:57 -0700 Message-ID: <022801c0f28d$61e0b200$e2b4bfa8 computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: Cc: References: <3B24DA92.CCE58B4D bellsouth.net> Subject: Re: Aquino info on Anti Gravity - Meland Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 10:44:01 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Resent-Message-ID: <"11Cet3.0.QQ3.0OF9x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43084 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: ----- Original Message ----- From: "Terry Blanton" To: Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 9:49 AM Subject: Aquino info on Anti Gravity - Meland Thanks Terry. Those three spherical Cavity Resonators allow the EM wave to circle in them very close to the speed of light, c which mimics the wave circles (quarks) in an atom setting up circling charge, Q = CV. Should work just fine with the right mode that will allow relativistic coupling with the Earth's Gravity Field. Working with a fellow vortexian we tried large 1/4 inch copper tubing "hoops" fed with various pulse shapes up to 24 Mhz, but this doesn't get close enough to c to synchronize with the Gravity field which is so close to c that the dilation Gamma is ~ 6.0 x 10^18 and the 137*c phase velocity. With clean Vacuum Resonant Cavities you should get there. Regards, Frederick > Gnorts, Vorts, > > It is interesting to compare Chris Hardeman's antigravity device > at: > > http://www.icnet.net/users/chrish/Test.htm > > to George Adamski's most famous UFO photo at: > > http://www.ufobbs.com/pics1/adamski3.html > > Thoses spheres have just gotta be a coincidence, eh? > > Terry > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 11 09:50:57 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id JAA15188; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 09:49:35 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 09:49:35 -0700 Reply-To: From: "Keith Nagel" To: Subject: RE: Mercury Arc Space Drive? Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 12:55:03 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 In-Reply-To: <020601c0f263$e1781000$e2b4bfa8 computer> Importance: Normal Resent-Message-ID: <"gA2M12.0.2j3.TQF9x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43085 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: I presume you're pulling my leg here, but as we both know the cathode has to be down due to the mercury pool, wouldn't I expect a weight gain? K. -----Original Message----- From: Frederick Sparber [mailto:fjsparber earthlink.net] Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 6:47 AM To: vortex-l eskimo.com Cc: jlsparber earthlink.net Subject: Re: Mercury Arc Space Drive? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Keith Nagel" To: Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2001 11:49 PM Subject: RE: Mercury Arc Space Drive? Hi Keith. If you can get one to take off with the cathode down, that would really be something! :-) Frederick > Hi Fred. > > OK, I've done my share of experimenting with mercury > ignitrons. Is this something like what you have in mind? > I'll say, when you push a 1000 amps or so thru one > they make quite a pop, but I haven't seen one take > off yet. Any suggestions for testing here? I happen to > have one with all the driver circuitry set up, so > go ahead... > > K. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Frederick Sparber [mailto:fjsparber earthlink.net] > Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2001 5:47 AM > To: vortex-l eskimo.com > Cc: jlsparber earthlink.net > Subject: Re: Mercury Arc Space Drive? > > > Just in case experiment for unsure skeptics: > > Use two ~1/4 inch diameter tungsten welding rods tightly inserted in a > quartz or > ceramic tube (~1.0 mm gap) with a small drop of Hg or Cs contacting them in > the gap , > so that the drop vaporizes when the voltage (24 volts D.C.) is applied with > the > negative side up. > > If it levitates... :-) > > Regards, Frederick > > > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 11 10:21:34 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id KAA29669; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 10:20:54 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 10:20:54 -0700 Reply-To: From: "Keith Nagel" To: "Vortex" Subject: Chapter from the weird history of free energy... Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 13:26:21 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Importance: Normal Resent-Message-ID: <"K1gYa2.0.QF7.qtF9x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43086 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Hi All. For those of us inclined to study the past in some vain attempt to understand this odd phenomena of fringe energy research, this chapter has to be one of the strangest. Back in the twenties, Alfred Hubbard was credited with the development of an atomic battery, powered by radium salts. Here's a link for more info, if you're unfamiliar with the story http://www.geocities.com/ResearchTriangle/Lab/1135/hubbard.html This was strongly reminiscent of Paul Browns work on atomic batteries. He eventually sold rights to the device to the Radium Corp. and seemingly ceased development. Now, the boy was hardly in his 20's when all this happened, and I often wondered what happened to this character after selling his invention. Check out the link below for the full story, you cannot possibly make this stuff up... http://www.disinfo.com/pages/article/id1284/pg1/ K. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 11 11:10:19 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id LAA18135; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 11:08:38 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 11:08:38 -0700 Message-ID: <024301c0f298$ce68cf60$e2b4bfa8 computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: Cc: Subject: Re: Aquino info on Anti Gravity - Meland Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 12:05:50 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0005_01C0F26E.DB6493E0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Resent-Message-ID: <"MxnKS2.0.HR4.baG9x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43087 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C0F26E.DB6493E0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit A short course on Resonant Cavities. Spherical Cavity Shown. http://www.tpub.com/neets/book11/44n.htm Frederick ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C0F26E.DB6493E0 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="Several types of cavities.url" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="Several types of cavities.url" [DEFAULT] BASEURL=3Dhttp://www.tpub.com/neets/book11/44n.htm [DOC_BURST] BASEURL=3Dhttp://www.burstnet.com/cgi-bin/ads/ad6160a.cgi/1798/RETURN-COD= E ORIGURL=3Dhttp://www.burstnet.com/cgi-bin/ads/ad6160a.cgi/1798/RETURN-COD= E [DOC_BURST#6] BASEURL=3Dhttp://view.avenuea.com/avenuea/iview/burstmedia_buy1com01440aa= _ron_468x60_iframe_tpl/direct/019760?click=3Dhttp://www.burstnet.com/ads/= ad6160a-map.cgi/BCPG8499.16519.16852?BURSTURL=3D ORIGURL=3Dhttp://view.avenuea.com/avenuea/iview/burstmedia_buy1com01440aa= _ron_468x60_iframe_tpl/direct/019760?click=3Dhttp://www.burstnet.com/ads/= ad6160a-map.cgi/BCPG8499.16519.16852?BURSTURL=3D [DOC#107] BASEURL=3Dhttp://www.burstnet.com/cgi-bin/ads/ba6160a.cgi/RETURN-CODE/if/= 1/ ORIGURL=3Dhttp://www.burstnet.com/cgi-bin/ads/ba6160a.cgi/RETURN-CODE/if/= 1/ [InternetShortcut] URL=3Dhttp://www.tpub.com/neets/book11/44n.htm Modified=3DA0D5AB4A98F2C001B5 ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C0F26E.DB6493E0-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 11 11:39:36 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id LAA28472; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 11:36:30 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 11:36:30 -0700 Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20010611143552.00a90768 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 14:36:14 -0400 To: vortex-l eskimo.com, From: Jed Rothwell Subject: Hyrogen fuel economics - part 1 (didn't appear) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <"pk_wX3.0.ay6.j-G9x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43088 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Frederick Sparber wrote: > No one is suggesting that automobile hydrogen fuel should be produced by > > present-day chemical methods. All studies advocate deriving hydrogen from > > solar or wind power. There is more than enough wind power to accomplish > this. > >At what cost Jed? It takes 25 Kw-Hr per pound of Hydrogen produced. At >$.10/ kw-hr >and 55,000 btu/lb >heat of combustion for H2 you are getting close to $2.50 >for the energy equivalent of a gallon of gasoline or diesel. Cost is the problem, but I do not think it is as high as you estimate. I have a dated but detailed and authoritative source here: "Hydrogen Program Plan, FY 1993 - 1997," DoE, NREL, published 1993. This does not include estimates for wind power, which has become much more cost effective than people predicted in 1992. Anyway, p. 23 shows the efficiency, capital cost and emissions for a variety of systems, both conventional and hydrogen. It is a little difficult to compare cost per gallon equivalent, because the main expense is for capital equipment, and it is hard to say how long the equipment lasts. A "direct solar to hydrogen" facility that costs $21,100 per kWh is more expensive than a fossil fuel plant at $3,200 per kWh, but it might last much longer, and of course there is no fuel cost over the life of the plant. Some examples: CURRENT TECHNOLOGY Crude oil to gasoline ICE (what we have now) 9.5 units of input energy for each unit of propulsion energy delivered 8.5 thousand dollars per kilowatt capital cost 2.4 kg CO2/kWh 4.2 grams NOx/kWh Photovoltaics to hydrogen 25.9 units input energy 71.4 thousand dollars/kWh (no pollution) Fossil fuels, electricity, battery electric car 5.1 units input energy 3.2 thousand dollars/kWh -- seems high, but they include distribution network cost 1.6 kg CO2/kWh 4.4 g NOx/kWh 11.8 g SO2/kWh Natural Gas 11.2 units input energy 0.5 thousand dollars/kWh 1.3 kg CO2/kWh 4.0 g NOx/kWh ADVANCED Coal gasification 6.3 units input energy 4.0 thousand dollars/kWh 1.8 kg CO2/kWh 3.6 g NOx/kWh Direct solar 4.1 units input energy 21.1 thousand dollars/kWh (no pollution) Biomass to hydrogen 6.8 units input energy 4.4 thousand dollars/kWh (no pollution listed - but I think there is some.) As of 1992, fossil fuel for electric cars was the most efficient and least polluting method of transportation listed here. (Nuclear or hydro power => electric car is not shown.) Anyway, based on the current cost of fossil fuel generators versus wind farms in Montana, I estimate CURRENT technology (in 2001) would look like this: Wind to hydrogen ?? units input energy (but it makes no difference) 6.4 thousand dollars/kWh (no pollution) I am not sure how much it would cost to send the hydrogen gas from Montana to California, but I do not think it would be excessively expensive. It may not make economic sense to send it to the east coast. In many states, with a large number of vehicles, such as Texas and Iowa, the gas would be pumped only short distances, or no distance at all. >Even if you commited all of the hydro and nuclear to hydrogen production >you couldn't come close to meeting the demand. You could not today, but the idea would be to gradually increase power generation and on-site electrolysis, which you phase out oil and coal production. - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 11 12:12:39 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id MAA07512; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 12:07:29 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 12:07:29 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Sender: mjones pop.jump.net Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: <002201c0efff$74f9c9c0$e2b4bfa8 computer> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 14:04:21 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Mitchell Jones Subject: Re: Primordial Gas Cloud & Spacecraft Drag Resent-Message-ID: <"HBtVa3.0.Ir1.mRH9x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43089 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: >In reply to Mitchell Jones's message of Fri, 8 Jun 2001 10:14:17 -0500: >[snip] >>poles again, and so on. If this flow pattern were strong enough, it would >>produce an observable differential rotation pattern in Earth's atmosphere, >>such that the atmosphere would rotate more slowly at higher altitudes, and >>more slowly nearer to the poles. However, Earth is a small planet, close to >[snip] >>region where Earth's gravity is dominant. (Note: Earth's magnetic field >>acts as a shield against the solar wind.) --MJ}*** >Is it possible that the Earth's magnetic field *is* the detectable >effect of the aether flow? ***{By my theory, the aether is a particulate medium which pervades all of space. It consists of an infinite series of successively more fine-grained substrates, which I dub E1, E2, E3, etc. The particles of E1, which I call etherons, are of a size similar to electrons; the particles of E2 are vastly smaller; and the particles of E3 are smaller still; etc. Because of this infinite graduation of smallness, any object that spins, including electrons and nuclei, is going to suck aether in at its poles and hurl it out along the equator. The reason: no matter how small the object, there will be an aether substrate which is small enough to flow through it. This is the state of affairs which causes nearby spinning particles to snap together to form magnetic flux lines, as I explained in vast detail in posts to this group in the past. Thus, in a sense, Earth's magnetic field is the detectible effect of aether flow. Note, however, that it is not the flow of E1 through Earth that produces Earth's magnetic field, but rather the flow of E2 through atoms, which does so. --MJ}*** >[snip] >Regards, > >Robin van Spaandonk ***{The above comments, of course, are unintelligible if you did not read my earlier posts on this topic (e.g., Dec. 13, 1999 at 13:09) . In case you did not, here is the gist of the theory again: ************************************ The use of the so called "right hand rule" is not required to comprehend relationships within a magnetic field, for those who develop a correct visual model of what a magnetic field *is*. To assist you in doing that, let's begin by imagining a smoothly flowing current (non-turbulent) of some liquid, down a channel. Under such circumstances, friction with the walls of the channel will give a zero velocity to particles of fluid that are actually touching the walls, a slight, positive velocity to the particles that are touching them, and so on as we progress outward toward the center of the channel, where the fluid particles will be moving with some maximum velocity. And, of course, as we approach the opposite bank of the flow, velocities will slow down again. An ASCII art representation of the situation follows. (Note: Viewers of ASCII art should always switch to a fixed length font such as Courier, in order to see the image without distortion.) =================================== > -> --> ---> ----> -----> ----> ---> --> -> > =================================== In the above, the banks of the channel are represented by the strings of equal signs, and the velocity of the current, at various distances from the banks, is represented by the lengths of the arrows, which are intended as vectors. Now suppose that we drop thousands of ping-pong balls into the current, at random locations. What, if any, will be the pattern of their rotations, as viewed from above? The answer: the ones above the center of the channel will rotate counter clockwise, and those that below the center will rotate in the clockwise direction. The reason: the portion of the fluid stream closest to the center of the flow will always be moving faster than the portion that is further from the center. If we now extend our thinking from two dimensions to three, and imagine, say, a flow with circular symmetry that is ten feet wide, moving through the ocean at a depth of 1000 feet, it is easy to see that similar considerations will apply: any objects that are carried along by the flow will rotate in such a way that the direction of inside rotation--i.e., the side closest to the center of the flow--will rotate in the same direction as the flow. Now let's go a step further: suppose that the objects which are introduced into the flow have an intrinsic spin--i.e., that they are rotating when they are introduced into the flow, and have sufficient angular momentum to continue spinning for awhile. Will they reorient their spin axes so that the direction of their inside rotation is in the same direction as the flow? The answer is yes: that is the stable equilibrium state; the opposite is an unstable equilibrium; and all of the in-between states experience a torque that tends to twist the axis of rotation toward the stable state. Well, then, what happens to the spinning spheres once they have all lined up so that their inside rotations are in the direction of the current flow? The answer: they will attractively interact to form circular loops around the center of the current flow--quasi flux lines, if you will. Why? Because as they spin in the fluid, they will each suck in a downstream of fluid at their polar axes, which will then flow across the surface toward the equator of the sphere, and then be thrown away from the sphere along its equatorial plane. As a result of the suction at the poles of the rotating spheres, the north pole of one sphere will attract the south pole of the sphere above it, and they will become coupled together by the fluid flow. Thus the north pole of one sphere will become fluid coupled to the south pole of the sphere above it, and the north pole of that sphere will couple to the south pole of the one above *it*, and so on, until the spheres couple themselves together into a closed loop, like a pearl necklace. Each of the "pearls" in the necklace will be spinning with its inside rotation in the direction of the flow of fluid in the channel. Result: a structure analogous to a loop of flux--a "flux line"--will be formed. How do actual flux lines form? Simple: there exists a particulate medium, the aether, which pervades the universe, and is composed of an infinite series of substrates, E1, E2, E3, etc., with the particles of each successive substrate being smaller than those of the previous one. Just as the objects of ordinary experience are immersed in an ocean of air, so molecules of air are immersed in an ocean of E1 particles, and the particles of E1 are immersed in an ocean of E2 particles, etc. Result: when excess electrons move through a copper wire, they stir up parallel currents in E1, E2, etc. Since the particles of E1--which I call etherons--have an intrinsic spin and float in the ocean of E2 particles, the effect of the moving electrons is to stir a current in E2, which then causes the particles of E1--the etherons--to snap together, thereby forming closed loops of flux centered on the axis of the current flow and perpendicular to it. Within my framework, Coulomb forces are explained as follows: (1) A negative charge throws off microparticles which I call *negites*, which move at many millions of times the speed of light. When they strike another negative charge--e.g., an electron--they are absorbed, giving that charge an impulse which tends to move it away from the charge which emitted the negite. When, on the other hand, they strike a positive charge--e.g., a proton--they cause it to emit two particles from its opposite side, which travel at the same velocity as the negites and have the same mass. The result, in that case, is to accelerate the positive charge *toward* the source of the negites. (2) I call the microparticles thrown off by positive charges *posites*. By my theory, they also move at many millions of times the speed of light. When they strike another positive charge, they are absorbed, giving that charge an impulse which tends to move it away from the charge which emitted the posite. When, on the other hand, they strike a negative charge, they cause it to emit two negites in the opposite direction, which travel at the same velocity as the posites and have the same mass. This cause the negative charge to move toward the source of the posites. As a result of (1) and (2), like charges repel, while opposites attract. Since each electron is emitting negites in vast numbers, it follows that it contains an immense number of them, stored--a supply of "ammo," as it were--for its future emissions. And since the excess electrons that are in motion along the axis of the wire are being wildly jostled about as they bounce willy-nilly from one copper atom to another, they experience huge and chaotic velocity variations--i.e., accelerations. Result: vast numbers of negites are thrown off, not at hundreds of millions of times the speed of light, but at pedestrian velocities: they arise, within and around the copper wire, in a vast cloud, much as dust billows out behind a speeding dump truck, as it carries a load of dirt down a bumpy road. Result: the negites are carried along in the pattern of E2 flow, which, as I have already explained, is influenced by the spin patterns of the etherons, which are lined up in closed loops around the center of the axis of the electron movement. Here is an analysis, using the above theory, of what happens when a positive test charge is moved against the flow of electrons, in the vicinity of a copper wire through which a DC current is flowing: (1) Asthe positive test charge moves along, parallel to the copper wire, in a direction opposite the flow of electrons in the wire, the excess protons which it contains will approach flux lines. (2) The inside rotation of those flux lines will be parallel to the direction of electron movement in the wire and they will be surrounded by negites that are moving in the same way that the flux lines are rotating. Result: as the excess protons in the test charge approach flux lines, they will be struck by negites that are moving away from the axis of the copper wire. (3) Since when a negite strikes a proton it causes it to move *in the opposite direction to the motion of the negite*, it follows that the positive test charge will tend to move toward the wire. A similar analysis will show that when the positive test charge moves in the same direction as the electron flow, it will be forced *away* from the wire, when a negative test charge moves opposite the electron flow, it will be forced away from the wire, and when a negative test charge is moved with the electron flow, it will be forced toward the wire. Bottom line: once you have incorporated the above described visual model into your thinking about magnetic fields, you will have no further need for the so called "right hand rule." ************************************ So there you have it! :-) --Mitchell Jones}*** ________________ Quote of the month: "Always strive to be accurate, even when it doesn't matter, so that you can be accurate when it does matter." --Jude Acers From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 11 12:39:17 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id MAA14592; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 12:30:33 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 12:30:33 -0700 Message-ID: <026501c0f2a4$39028a40$e2b4bfa8 computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: Cc: References: Subject: Re: Mercury Arc Space Drive? Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 13:27:43 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Resent-Message-ID: <"DT3SX2.0.gZ3.MnH9x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43090 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: ----- Original Message ----- From: "Keith Nagel" To: Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 11:55 AM Subject: RE: Mercury Arc Space Drive? You said, "I haven't seen one take off yet". How can it take off with the Hg cathode down? :-) OTOH, a weight gain with it sitting on a scale would be most interesting. OTOH II, you might put in some D2 at a few miilitorr and make a Cold Fusion (Mizuno -Ohmori) device out of it, and use that to power it. Frederick > I presume you're pulling my leg here, but > as we both know the cathode has to be down due > to the mercury pool, wouldn't I expect a > weight gain? > > K. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Frederick Sparber [mailto:fjsparber earthlink.net] > Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 6:47 AM > To: vortex-l eskimo.com > Cc: jlsparber earthlink.net > Subject: Re: Mercury Arc Space Drive? > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Keith Nagel" > To: > Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2001 11:49 PM > Subject: RE: Mercury Arc Space Drive? > > Hi Keith. > If you can get one to take off with the cathode down, that > would really be something! :-) > > Frederick > > > > Hi Fred. > > > > OK, I've done my share of experimenting with mercury > > ignitrons. Is this something like what you have in mind? > > I'll say, when you push a 1000 amps or so thru one > > they make quite a pop, but I haven't seen one take > > off yet. Any suggestions for testing here? I happen to > > have one with all the driver circuitry set up, so > > go ahead... > > > > K. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Frederick Sparber [mailto:fjsparber earthlink.net] > > Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2001 5:47 AM > > To: vortex-l eskimo.com > > Cc: jlsparber earthlink.net > > Subject: Re: Mercury Arc Space Drive? > > > > > > Just in case experiment for unsure skeptics: > > > > Use two ~1/4 inch diameter tungsten welding rods tightly inserted in a > > quartz or > > ceramic tube (~1.0 mm gap) with a small drop of Hg or Cs contacting them > in > > the gap , > > so that the drop vaporizes when the voltage (24 volts D.C.) is applied > with > > the > > negative side up. > > > > If it levitates... :-) > > > > Regards, Frederick > > > > > > > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 11 12:40:12 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id MAA17987; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 12:37:13 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 12:37:13 -0700 Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20010611152340.0292e9b8 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 15:37:02 -0400 To: vortex-L eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: Atlanta traffic problem solved Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <"x1thA2.0.uO4.dtH9x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43091 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 2:00 a.m. Saturday, a truck overturned on one of Atlanta's busiest sections of highway. A thousand gallons of gasoline spilled and ignited, destroying a large part of a bridge and blocking another highway underneath. Fortunately, no one was hurt. Most of the highway will be closed off for six weeks or more. See photos at: http://www.accessatlanta.com/partners/ajc/newsatlanta/crash/image1.html Many people predicted that this morning's commute would be the worst in history. I predicted that people would make plans and take steps to avoid the mess. I was right. Quoting the Atlanta Journal/Constitution: "This morning, it has been outstanding. We got through in far better shape than I thought we would," Fulton County police Maj. T.R. Shaw said. "We may have found a way to solve Atlanta's traffic problems. Maybe the way to get traffic to move in Atlanta is to periodically knock down a bridge." This is probably intended to be a witticism, but in fact the Major is right, and this should have been clear to everyone long ago. Building more highways will only make traffic worse and worse. The only way to fix the traffic problem is to effectively close highways down, either by knocking down bridges or charging a high toll. Highways and commuter railroads are 19th century solutions to a 21st century problem. The best solution now is telecommuting from small satellite offices close to home, or in the home. A continuously open ADSL to the boss with a computer stop action CAM video will keep people from goofing off, if that is a problem. The way to cut back traffic immediately is to ration a scarce resource: highway pavement at rush hour. Make people pay for it. Charge a large toll, say $5 or $10, and make the MARTA commuter train free. In other words, reverse the incentives, and close off the highways to most people. It is a shame that this would disproportionately hurt poor people, but most policies to solve most problems hurt poor people, after all. Making MARTA free would help poor people disproportionately. People at all income levels would quickly find other ways to get to work, including carpooling, MARTA or telecommuting. In California, electricity consumption in May fell 11% compared to May 2000. The energy crisis could be eliminated with conservation and innovation, at a much lower cost than with any other method. We are far from the thermodynamic limits of most manufacturing, transportation or space heating applications, and far from limits of cost-effective improvements. If the U.S. is incapable of doing this, as our political leaders apparently believe, then we can buy all the technology we need from our economic rivals, who manage to squeeze three times more GDP out of their fuel than we get out of ours. - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 11 13:19:38 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id NAA32415; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 13:12:55 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 13:12:55 -0700 Reply-To: From: "Keith Nagel" To: Subject: RE: Mercury Arc Space Drive? Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 16:18:50 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 In-Reply-To: <026501c0f2a4$39028a40$e2b4bfa8 computer> Importance: Normal Resent-Message-ID: <"ykPJ03.0.Pw7.6PI9x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43095 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Hi Fred, Well, the thing sits on a hard table, and I fire it. If a downward impulse occurs, would I not expect to see the thing bounce? The table is rigid, and the ignitron is free to move. "Grade School physics" as you like to say (smile). I've moved >1000 amps thru such a device for about a millisecond, care to calculate how much force I'd expect from that? The device itself weighs about 3 kilograms. Think single shot here, it'd require way too much work to make a charger for the cap bank that'd do much more than that. Oh yeah, the output is a nice clean square pulse. I don't use it anymore, preferring to work with SCR's which are in most ways superior. If the numbers work out, I can probably test this. Send up the kites, Igor! K. -----Original Message----- From: Frederick Sparber [mailto:fjsparber earthlink.net] Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 2:28 PM To: vortex-l eskimo.com Cc: jlsparber earthlink.net Subject: Re: Mercury Arc Space Drive? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Keith Nagel" To: Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 11:55 AM Subject: RE: Mercury Arc Space Drive? You said, "I haven't seen one take off yet". How can it take off with the Hg cathode down? :-) OTOH, a weight gain with it sitting on a scale would be most interesting. OTOH II, you might put in some D2 at a few miilitorr and make a Cold Fusion (Mizuno -Ohmori) device out of it, and use that to power it. Frederick > I presume you're pulling my leg here, but > as we both know the cathode has to be down due > to the mercury pool, wouldn't I expect a > weight gain? > > K. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Frederick Sparber [mailto:fjsparber earthlink.net] > Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 6:47 AM > To: vortex-l eskimo.com > Cc: jlsparber earthlink.net > Subject: Re: Mercury Arc Space Drive? > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Keith Nagel" > To: > Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2001 11:49 PM > Subject: RE: Mercury Arc Space Drive? > > Hi Keith. > If you can get one to take off with the cathode down, that > would really be something! :-) > > Frederick > > > > Hi Fred. > > > > OK, I've done my share of experimenting with mercury > > ignitrons. Is this something like what you have in mind? > > I'll say, when you push a 1000 amps or so thru one > > they make quite a pop, but I haven't seen one take > > off yet. Any suggestions for testing here? I happen to > > have one with all the driver circuitry set up, so > > go ahead... > > > > K. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Frederick Sparber [mailto:fjsparber earthlink.net] > > Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2001 5:47 AM > > To: vortex-l eskimo.com > > Cc: jlsparber earthlink.net > > Subject: Re: Mercury Arc Space Drive? > > > > > > Just in case experiment for unsure skeptics: > > > > Use two ~1/4 inch diameter tungsten welding rods tightly inserted in a > > quartz or > > ceramic tube (~1.0 mm gap) with a small drop of Hg or Cs contacting them > in > > the gap , > > so that the drop vaporizes when the voltage (24 volts D.C.) is applied > with > > the > > negative side up. > > > > If it levitates... :-) > > > > Regards, Frederick > > > > > > > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 11 13:22:20 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id NAA00698; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 13:14:53 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 13:14:53 -0700 Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20010611154920.029be7f0 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 16:14:41 -0400 To: vortex-l eskimo.com, From: Jed Rothwell Subject: Hyrogen fuel economics - Part about Fred's statement Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <"ZhglK.0.mA.xQI9x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43096 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Frederick Sparber wrote: >At what cost Jed? It takes 25 Kw-Hr per pound of Hydrogen produced. At >$.10/ kw-hr and 55,000 btu/lb heat of combustion for H2 you are getting >close to $2.50 for the energy equivalent of a gallon of gasoline or diesel. I should have agreed that the cycle Fred describes is completely out of the question. He is talking about the heat of combustion of H2, or in other words, burning H2 in something like a conventional ICE. It is even worse than he estimated: CURRENT TECHNOLOGY Averaged fossil fuels to electricity to hydrogen 71.9 units of input energy for each unit of propulsion energy delivered 71.4 thousand dollars per kilowatt capital cost (same 71 by coincidence) 22.6 kg CO2/kWh 62.9 grams NOx/kWh 169.6 grams SO2/kWh This is 7.6 times less efficient than conventional ICE, and 8.4 times more expensive in capital costs. As I said earlier, no one has advocated this scheme as far as I know. It would be economic lunacy -- kind of the Japanese breeder reactor program. Hydrogen produced by other means and then used in a fuel cell has much more promise. In the cycle Fred described, electrolysis is 65% efficient, bulk storage and vehicle on board storage are both 65% efficient, and the ICE is only 18%. A fuel cell is roughly 50% efficient. "Advanced Technology" electrolysis and gas storage are both projected at 75% efficient. Combining advanced techniques, from fossil fuel => electricity => fuel cell it ends up taking 12.9 units of energy to produce 1 unit of vehicle propulsion, which still makes no economic sense. Other techniques such as natural gas => hydrogen or even gasoline => hydrogen on-board reformulating have more promise. - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 11 13:22:31 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id NAA02250; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 13:18:20 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 13:18:20 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Sender: mjones pop.jump.net Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <002d01c0f09b$212cdfc0$a2962640 bear> References: Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 15:15:37 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Mitchell Jones Subject: RE: Nemesis: The Death Star Resent-Message-ID: <"2OZqC2.0.yY.AUI9x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43097 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: >Mitchell, > Good work. >There is precedence for your theory. You may have gravitationally bound >harmonics in a orbiting system with separate orbits. There are several >levels of these harmonics. > >However Occam's Razor postulates that you do not need the Nemesis star. Your >theory is sound, as moons of Jupiter and Saturn exhibit harmonics, and >therefore any gravitationally bound system may do so. > >Your theory misses out the relevant facts that the galactic disk may also be >in fact a breeding ground for much vaster numbers of dark cometary material. >Just the passing of the sun through these lanes may in fact cause the event >you described. ***{Is this part of the Rampino-Stothers hypothesis that Fred was talking about? Anyway, I don't see how it could possibly work. It seems impossible to me that comets could concentrate in the galactic midplane, for the very reason you stated: every time a star passed through the midplane, it would disrupt the comets in its vicinity, sending them flying wildly hither and thither. Since every single star in the galaxy participates in the bobbing motion, passing repeatedly through the midplane and back again, it is clearly physically impossible for a concentration of comets to exist there. Result: a star--Nemesis--is required to explain the periodicity of the mass extinctions. --MJ}*** This would explain how the comets in our solar system may >actually come in all angles to the plane of solar elliptic and plane of >galactic elliptic. ***{Long period comets are from the Oort cloud, where they were originally in circular orbits, prior to being perturbed by passing stars--e.g., by Nemesis. They enter the inner solar system from all angles because the circular orbits in the Oort cloud are oriented at many angles, rather than being formed into a flattened disc like the Kuiper belt. The reason the Oort cloud is spherical rather than disc-shaped like the Kuiper belt is simply that, at those vast distances from the sun--i.e., 30,000 to 100,000 AU--orbital velocities are so very, very low that the comets in the cloud are barely moving. Result: they almost never collide with one another, and hence the averaging process that tends to flatten spherical clouds into a disc requires more time than has been available. To illustrate the point, let's calculate the speed of the comets at the heart of the Oort cloud--i.e., at about 70,000 AU. The outward or centrifugal force is Fo = mV^2/r, and the inward force of gravity is Fi = GmM/r^2, where G is the gravitational constant, m is the mass of the comet, M is the mass of Sol, and r is the distance of the comet from Sol. For a comet in a stable orbit, Fo = Fi, so we have: mV^2/r = GmM/r^2, or V^2 = GM/r, or V = (GM/r)^.5 = [(6.672x10^-8) (1.9891x10^33)/(7x10^4)(14,959,787,000,000)^.5 = (1.27x10^8)^.5 = 11,280 cm/sec, or 11.3 m/sec. That's just 25 miles per hour! By astronomical standards, in other words, the comets in the Oort cloud are barely moving. As a result, they sweep out very little space per unit of time, relative to the immensities of the space available, thereby reducing the collisions probabilities per unit time virtually to zero. Result: it takes too long for the comets in the Oort cloud to aggregate together into a disc--longer than the life of the sun. Hence it is not necessary to postulate that the Oort cloud does not exist and that, in fact, long period comets come in from interstellar space, to explain why they come in from all angles. --Mitchell Jones}*** [snip] >Matthew Rogers ________________ Quote of the month: "Always strive to be accurate, even when it doesn't matter, so that you can be accurate when it does matter." --Jude Acers From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 11 13:23:40 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx2.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id MAA25233; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 12:44:17 -0700 (PDT) Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 12:44:17 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Sender: mjones pop.jump.net Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <019501c0f1da$a453e520$e2b4bfa8 computer> References: Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 14:38:34 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Mitchell Jones Subject: Re: Mercury Arc Space Drive? Resent-Message-ID: <"MAxNK.0.p96.C-H9x" mx2> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43092 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Mitchell Jones" >To: >Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2001 12:56 PM >Subject: Re: Mercury Arc Space Drive? > >Mitchell Jones wrote: > >> Frederick Sparber wrote: > >> >According to some very astute calculations a Mercury Arc Discharge( Cesium >> >or Xenon >> >will work too) can work as a space drive without expelling any propellant. >> > >> >This comes about because the slow moving heavy positive ion, M+, striking >> >the cathode >> >have as much as 600 times >> >the momentum as the stripped electron, e- striking the anode: >> > >> >mv = m(2Vq/m)^1/2 >> > >> >With about 20 volts 750 amperes (15 Kwe) 4.45 newtons (1.0 lb) of thrust >> >can be >> >obtained. >> >> ***{In order for the positive ion to acquire that momentum, it must first >> be repelled away from the anode and then attracted to the cathode--which >> means: for every increment to the momentum of the positive ion, the anode >> and/or cathode must acquire equal momentum in the opposite direction. >> Result: there is no net change in the momentum of the system. --MJ}*** > >That is the intuitive take, but sometime past I was informed of a "Cathode >Drag >Effect" in an electrical discharge. > >Time to check it out. > >IOW the arc discharge produces a reflecion of the impacting ion (possibly >neutralized >at the cathode surface) >thus a net force on the cathode. > >Regards, Frederick ***{I've been thinking about this some more. My assumption is that the cathode and the anode are inside a sealed off glass chamber containing mercury vapor, which is ionized by the voltage gradient. Electrons are stripped off of the mercury atoms at the anode, after which the resulting positive ions are first accelerated away from the anode by the positive electric field there, and then accelerated further by the negative electric field as they approach the cathode. Then, when the mercury ions strike the cathode, they give back all of the momentum that they gained during the acceleration phase. The idea, then, is that as the positive ion is accelerated toward the cathode, the lamp as a whole is accelerated in the opposite direction--i.e., in the direction pointed to by the anode end of the lamp--and when it slams to a stop at the cathode and is handed an electron, it merely stops the displacement of the lamp, rather than moving the lamp back to its starting point. If so, then what is ignored is the subsequent effect of moving the resulting mercury atom back to the anode again: that movement will undo the displacement of the lamp which resulted from moving the mercury ion to the cathode. Perhaps an analogy will make the point more clearly. Suppose a bum is inside a locked railway car, which is sitting on a frictionless track. He has a tub of mud at one end of the car, and he fashions mudballs and hurls them to the opposite end of the car, where they stick on the wall. Result: each mudball that he throws will produce a slight displacement of the car toward the end from which he is throwing. That displacement will occur while the mudball is in flight, and will cease when it strikes the wall. Once all the mudballs have been tossed, the car will have been displaced a distance x down the tracks, and, when the bum picks up his now empty tub and walks to the other end of the car, where the mudballs are stuck, the car will displace even further down the tracks. However, if he then scrapes all the mudballs off the wall, puts them in the tub, and carries it back to the opposite end of the car, the entire displacement of the car will be undone. Bottom line: there is no way set an isolated system into uniform motion by moving masses about within the system. The only way to do it is to transfer mass or energy out of the system. --Mitchell Jones}*** >> >> >OTOH, I won't believe it until I see it fly. :-) >> > >> >Regards, Frederick >> >> ________________ >> Quote of the month: >> >> "Always strive to be accurate, even when it doesn't matter, so that you can >> be accurate when it does matter." --Jude Acers >> ________________ Quote of the month: "Always strive to be accurate, even when it doesn't matter, so that you can be accurate when it does matter." --Jude Acers From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 11 13:40:56 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx2.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id MAA27165; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 12:54:54 -0700 (PDT) Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 12:54:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <026e01c0f2a7$9af6ce20$e2b4bfa8 computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: Cc: References: <5.0.2.1.2.20010611143552.00a90768 pop.mindspring.com> Subject: Re: Hyrogen fuel economics - part 1 (didn't appear) Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 13:51:53 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Resent-Message-ID: <"LvUgL.0.Ge6.B8I9x" mx2> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43094 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jed Rothwell" To: ; Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 1:36 PM Subject: Hyrogen fuel economics - part 1 (didn't appear) Your first post came through ok, Jed, In the mid 1970s JPL sent a team to Pecos Texas to "rescue" the ag producers using $.05/kw-hr electricity to make hydrogen to replace the natural gas piped to pumped irrigation farms in the area. Fortunately their electrolysis cell exploded leveling a building before their $2.50/lb (~ $20.00/million btu)H2 fuel gas went on line to rescue them from ~$4.50/million btu natural gas cost. :-) My consulting team (funded by their worried bankers) showed them how to make thermochemical SNG from their ag wastes to run their gas-powered irrigation pumps. This ended the panic and bought enough time for George Bush et.al. to open the Midland-Odessa oil and gas fields and natural gas prices stabilized around $2.50/million btu. Regards, Frederick > Frederick Sparber wrote: > > > No one is suggesting that automobile hydrogen fuel should be produced by > > > present-day chemical methods. All studies advocate deriving hydrogen from > > > solar or wind power. There is more than enough wind power to accomplish > > this. > > > >At what cost Jed? It takes 25 Kw-Hr per pound of Hydrogen produced. At > >$.10/ kw-hr > >and 55,000 btu/lb > >heat of combustion for H2 you are getting close to $2.50 > >for the energy equivalent of a gallon of gasoline or diesel. > > Cost is the problem, but I do not think it is as high as you estimate. I > have a dated but detailed and authoritative source here: "Hydrogen Program > Plan, FY 1993 - 1997," DoE, NREL, published 1993. This does not include > estimates for wind power, which has become much more cost effective than > people predicted in 1992. Anyway, p. 23 shows the efficiency, capital cost > and emissions for a variety of systems, both conventional and hydrogen. It > is a little difficult to compare cost per gallon equivalent, because the > main expense is for capital equipment, and it is hard to say how long the > equipment lasts. A "direct solar to hydrogen" facility that costs $21,100 > per kWh is more expensive than a fossil fuel plant at $3,200 per kWh, but > it might last much longer, and of course there is no fuel cost over the > life of the plant. > > Some examples: > > CURRENT TECHNOLOGY > > Crude oil to gasoline ICE (what we have now) > 9.5 units of input energy for each unit of propulsion energy delivered > 8.5 thousand dollars per kilowatt capital cost > 2.4 kg CO2/kWh > 4.2 grams NOx/kWh > > Photovoltaics to hydrogen > 25.9 units input energy > 71.4 thousand dollars/kWh > (no pollution) > > Fossil fuels, electricity, battery electric car > 5.1 units input energy > 3.2 thousand dollars/kWh -- seems high, but they include distribution > network cost > 1.6 kg CO2/kWh > 4.4 g NOx/kWh > 11.8 g SO2/kWh > > Natural Gas > 11.2 units input energy > 0.5 thousand dollars/kWh > 1.3 kg CO2/kWh > 4.0 g NOx/kWh > > > ADVANCED > > Coal gasification > 6.3 units input energy > 4.0 thousand dollars/kWh > 1.8 kg CO2/kWh > 3.6 g NOx/kWh > > Direct solar > 4.1 units input energy > 21.1 thousand dollars/kWh > (no pollution) > > Biomass to hydrogen > 6.8 units input energy > 4.4 thousand dollars/kWh > (no pollution listed - but I think there is some.) > > As of 1992, fossil fuel for electric cars was the most efficient and least > polluting method of transportation listed here. (Nuclear or hydro power => > electric car is not shown.) Anyway, based on the current cost of fossil > fuel generators versus wind farms in Montana, I estimate CURRENT technology > (in 2001) would look like this: > > Wind to hydrogen > ?? units input energy (but it makes no difference) > 6.4 thousand dollars/kWh > (no pollution) > > I am not sure how much it would cost to send the hydrogen gas from Montana > to California, but I do not think it would be excessively expensive. It may > not make economic sense to send it to the east coast. In many states, with > a large number of vehicles, such as Texas and Iowa, the gas would be pumped > only short distances, or no distance at all. > > > >Even if you commited all of the hydro and nuclear to hydrogen production > >you couldn't come close to meeting the demand. > > You could not today, but the idea would be to gradually increase power > generation and on-site electrolysis, which you phase out oil and coal > production. > > - Jed > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 11 13:48:06 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id NAA13593; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 13:45:55 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 13:45:55 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Sender: mjones pop.jump.net Message-Id: Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 15:40:14 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Mitchell Jones Subject: RE: Nemesis: The Death Star Resent-Message-ID: <"km1mr2.0.DK3.1uI9x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43098 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Assuming my variant of the Nemesis theory is correct, the best way to search for Nemesis would be to look on the surface of a cylinder roughly 2.2 light years in radius, centered on Sol, and perpendicular to the galactic midplane. The first place I would look would be 8 pc below the midplane. Since the average distance between stars in the disc of the Milky Way is, if memory serves, about 6 light years, beginning the search there should narrow the list to a small number of candidates. Each can then be checked to see if its motion will bring it to a position 2.2 light years from Sol in about 13 million years. To do this, of course, one would need access to a supercomputer on which an accurate model of the motions of the various stars in our vicinity of the Milky Way has been stored. --MJ ________________ Quote of the month: "Always strive to be accurate, even when it doesn't matter, so that you can be accurate when it does matter." --Jude Acers From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 11 13:53:37 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id NAA15519; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 13:50:09 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 13:50:09 -0700 Message-ID: <028b01c0f2af$5db649c0$e2b4bfa8 computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: Cc: References: <3B24DA92.CCE58B4D bellsouth.net> <022801c0f28d$61e0b200$e2b4bfa8@computer> <3B252140.7A5E13BF@bellsouth.net> Subject: Re: Aquino info on Anti Gravity - Meland Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 14:47:17 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Resent-Message-ID: <"-y8er1.0.Po3.0yI9x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43099 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: ----- Original Message ----- From: "Terry Blanton" To: Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 2:51 PM Subject: Re: Aquino info on Anti Gravity - Meland This is called "back engineering", Terry. Using something whatever Crops Up, so to speak.. :-) Frederick > Frederick Sparber wrote: > > > Working with a fellow vortexian we tried large 1/4 inch > > copper tubing "hoops" fed with various pulse shapes up to 24 Mhz, but this doesn't get > > close enough to c to synchronize with the Gravity field which is so close to c that > > the dilation Gamma is ~ 6.0 x 10^18 and the 137*c > > phase velocity. > > Ah, yes, I remember the AG Hula-hoop! > > > With clean Vacuum Resonant Cavities you should get there. > > Fred, what is *really bizarre* about Hardeman's story is that he > got the idea from . . . a crop circle. Now you know me, I first > met you in the Compuserve UFO forums and I have a mind so open > that my brain often falls out. But a crop circle??!? Geeze. > > Here's the image: > > http://www.icnet.net/users/chrish/cropcir.html > > So, if someone is really trying to communicate with cereal > geometry, then what do all these other images mean?? > > http://www.lovely.clara.net/homepg.html > > Terry > > (returning to his study of the Zohar) > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 11 13:55:32 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx2.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id MAA26344; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 12:51:38 -0700 (PDT) Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 12:51:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3B252140.7A5E13BF bellsouth.net> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 15:51:28 -0400 From: Terry Blanton X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Aquino info on Anti Gravity - Meland References: <3B24DA92.CCE58B4D bellsouth.net> <022801c0f28d$61e0b200$e2b4bfa8@computer> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"YeVJT3.0.YR6.75I9x" mx2> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43093 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Frederick Sparber wrote: > Working with a fellow vortexian we tried large 1/4 inch > copper tubing "hoops" fed with various pulse shapes up to 24 Mhz, but this doesn't get > close enough to c to synchronize with the Gravity field which is so close to c that > the dilation Gamma is ~ 6.0 x 10^18 and the 137*c > phase velocity. Ah, yes, I remember the AG Hula-hoop! > With clean Vacuum Resonant Cavities you should get there. Fred, what is *really bizarre* about Hardeman's story is that he got the idea from . . . a crop circle. Now you know me, I first met you in the Compuserve UFO forums and I have a mind so open that my brain often falls out. But a crop circle??!? Geeze. Here's the image: http://www.icnet.net/users/chrish/cropcir.html So, if someone is really trying to communicate with cereal geometry, then what do all these other images mean?? http://www.lovely.clara.net/homepg.html Terry (returning to his study of the Zohar) From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 11 13:57:24 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id NAA16962; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 13:54:56 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 13:54:56 -0700 Message-ID: <028f01c0f2b0$00396060$e2b4bfa8 computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: Cc: References: Subject: Re: Mercury Arc Space Drive? Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 14:52:00 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Resent-Message-ID: <"DfUVf3.0.a84.Q0J9x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43100 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mitchell Jones" To: Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 2:38 PM Subject: Re: Mercury Arc Space Drive? Mud slinging don't hack it, Mitchell. Do the experiment. :-) Regards, Frederick > >Mitchell Jones wrote: > > > >> Frederick Sparber wrote: > > > >> >According to some very astute calculations a Mercury Arc Discharge( Cesium > >> >or Xenon > >> >will work too) can work as a space drive without expelling any propellant. > >> > > >> >This comes about because the slow moving heavy positive ion, M+, striking > >> >the cathode > >> >have as much as 600 times > >> >the momentum as the stripped electron, e- striking the anode: > >> > > >> >mv = m(2Vq/m)^1/2 > >> > > >> >With about 20 volts 750 amperes (15 Kwe) 4.45 newtons (1.0 lb) of thrust > >> >can be > >> >obtained. > >> > >> ***{In order for the positive ion to acquire that momentum, it must first > >> be repelled away from the anode and then attracted to the cathode--which > >> means: for every increment to the momentum of the positive ion, the anode > >> and/or cathode must acquire equal momentum in the opposite direction. > >> Result: there is no net change in the momentum of the system. --MJ}*** > > > >That is the intuitive take, but sometime past I was informed of a "Cathode > >Drag > >Effect" in an electrical discharge. > > > >Time to check it out. > > > >IOW the arc discharge produces a reflecion of the impacting ion (possibly > >neutralized > >at the cathode surface) > >thus a net force on the cathode. > > > >Regards, Frederick > > ***{I've been thinking about this some more. My assumption is that the > cathode and the anode are inside a sealed off glass chamber containing > mercury vapor, which is ionized by the voltage gradient. Electrons are > stripped off of the mercury atoms at the anode, after which the resulting > positive ions are first accelerated away from the anode by the positive > electric field there, and then accelerated further by the negative electric > field as they approach the cathode. Then, when the mercury ions strike the > cathode, they give back all of the momentum that they gained during the > acceleration phase. The idea, then, is that as the positive ion is > accelerated toward the cathode, the lamp as a whole is accelerated in the > opposite direction--i.e., in the direction pointed to by the anode end of > the lamp--and when it slams to a stop at the cathode and is handed an > electron, it merely stops the displacement of the lamp, rather than moving > the lamp back to its starting point. If so, then what is ignored is the > subsequent effect of moving the resulting mercury atom back to the anode > again: that movement will undo the displacement of the lamp which resulted > from moving the mercury ion to the cathode. > > Perhaps an analogy will make the point more clearly. Suppose a bum is > inside a locked railway car, which is sitting on a frictionless track. He > has a tub of mud at one end of the car, and he fashions mudballs and hurls > them to the opposite end of the car, where they stick on the wall. Result: > each mudball that he throws will produce a slight displacement of the car > toward the end from which he is throwing. That displacement will occur > while the mudball is in flight, and will cease when it strikes the wall. > Once all the mudballs have been tossed, the car will have been displaced a > distance x down the tracks, and, when the bum picks up his now empty tub > and walks to the other end of the car, where the mudballs are stuck, the > car will displace even further down the tracks. However, if he then scrapes > all the mudballs off the wall, puts them in the tub, and carries it back to > the opposite end of the car, the entire displacement of the car will be > undone. > > Bottom line: there is no way set an isolated system into uniform motion by > moving masses about within the system. The only way to do it is to transfer > mass or energy out of the system. > > --Mitchell Jones}*** > > >> > >> >OTOH, I won't believe it until I see it fly. :-) > >> > > >> >Regards, Frederick > >> > >> ________________ > >> Quote of the month: > >> > >> "Always strive to be accurate, even when it doesn't matter, so that you can > >> be accurate when it does matter." --Jude Acers > >> > > ________________ > Quote of the month: > > "Always strive to be accurate, even when it doesn't matter, so that you can > be accurate when it does matter." --Jude Acers > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 11 14:04:38 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id OAA20518; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 14:02:43 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 14:02:43 -0700 Message-ID: <3B2531F7.AC34BDD1 bellsouth.net> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 17:02:47 -0400 From: Terry Blanton X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Mercury Arc Space Drive? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"GayuF1.0.V05.p7J9x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43101 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: Mercury Arc Space Drive? Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 16:36:36 -0400 From: Terry Blanton To: knagel gis.net References: Keith Nagel wrote: > > Hi Fred, > > Well, the thing sits on a hard table, and I fire it. > If a downward impulse occurs, would I not expect to > see the thing bounce? The table is rigid, and the > ignitron is free to move. "Grade School physics" as > you like to say (smile). > > I've moved >1000 amps thru such a device for about > a millisecond, care to calculate how much force > I'd expect from that? The device itself weighs > about 3 kilograms. Think single shot here, it'd > require way too much work to make a charger > for the cap bank that'd do much more than that. > Oh yeah, the output is a nice clean square pulse. > > I don't use it anymore, preferring to work with > SCR's which are in most ways superior. > > If the numbers work out, I can probably test this. > Send up the kites, Igor! Keith, Are you aware of the alleged gravity modification aircraft "exposed" by Ed Fouche, the TR3B? (Not the TR3A!) See: http://fouchemedia.com/arap/index.htm for a picture and http://fouchemedia.com/arap/speech.htm (about 80% through the speech) he claims: "Sandia and Livermore laboratories developed the reverse engineered MFD technology. The government will go to any lengths to protect this technology. The plasma, mercury based, is pressurized at 250,000 atmospheres at a temperature of 150 degrees Kelvin, and accelerated to 50,000 rpm to create a super-conductive plasma with the resulting gravity disruption." I questioned his pressure figure and he said, "That's what they told me." Anyway, I enjoyed your reference on Al M. Hubbard. His story is more bizarre than Jack Parsons'. Terry From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 11 14:17:21 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id OAA23135; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 14:10:09 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 14:10:09 -0700 Message-ID: <001f01c0f2b0$4e86d900$e8181ad8 oemcomputer> From: "Bruce Meland" To: Subject: Re: Candidate for universal gravitational glue Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 12:54:18 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_001C_01C0F275.A07B3B60" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Resent-Message-ID: <"1UKpG2.0.Lf5.nEJ9x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43102 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_001C_01C0F275.A07B3B60 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable it is a wave -----Original Message----- From: thomas malloy To: vortex-l eskimo.com Date: Sunday, June 10, 2001 10:51 AM Subject: RE: Candidate for universal gravitational glue =20 =20 Thomas, =20 =20 =20 Gravity is a force not a particle. =20 =20 Hum, did you see my posting on the Gravitron conference? They seem = to think that gravity is manifested in the form of a particle. =20 =20 =20 =20 When the particle is found that generates the field that causes = gravity and inertia ( the two are equal ) then science will unify all = known forces. =20 =20 I assume that is what the Japanese researchers who are sponsoring = the conference have in mind. =20 =20 Neutrinos have very little interaction with matter, however = there is many of them. If they even have a little mass, then they would = have a large effect of a source of mass on the structure of the = universe, but still not have any effect on us beings of matter. =20 =20 The question is how can matter have an effect on neutrions? If they = could be captured and changed into energy, =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 The worlds most sensitive Neutrino observatory in Japan detected = less than 10 neutrino events from the 1986a supernova, a galaxy away, = even though trillions per square inch per second sleeted through our = galaxy. =20 =20 How do you know there are trillions? if you can't detect them? =20 =20 =20 =20 Neutrino's may have mass, which means enough of them exert a = gravitational force, but they would be just like any other matter with = gravitational force. =20 =20 considering your previous writing, this would seeem to be = contradictory =20 =20 Do a search on the Higgs particle and the Higgs Field, and you = will see that. =20 =20 =20 The last I heard, they were still looking for the Higgs Boson, did I = miss something? =20 =20 =20 =20 Also consider that even though the mind may be powerful enough = to visualize physics like Stephen Hawking, your electrical fields that = your brain creates are several orders of magnitude less than what is = required to influence matter around it. =20 =20 Have you ever heard of spoon bending? I'd say that this is a classic = example of theory conflicting with observed fact. =20 =20 =20 =20 Email: tom rhfweb.com =20 ------=_NextPart_000_001C_01C0F275.A07B3B60 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable RE: Candidate for universal = gravitational glue
it is a wave
-----Original = Message-----
From:=20 thomas malloy <temalloy@metro.lakes.com>=
To:=20 vortex-l@eskimo.com = <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Dat= e:=20 Sunday, June 10, 2001 10:51 AM
Subject: RE: Candidate = for=20 universal gravitational glue

Thomas,
 
Gravity is a force not a particle.

Hum, did you see my posting on the Gravitron conference? They = seem to=20 think that gravity is manifested in the form of a particle.


When=20 the particle is found that generates the field that causes = gravity and=20 inertia ( the two are equal ) then science will unify all known=20 forces.

I assume that is what the Japanese researchers who are = sponsoring the=20 conference have in mind.

Neutrinos have very little interaction with matter, = however=20 there is many of them. If they even have a little mass, then = they would=20 have a large effect of a source of mass on the structure of the=20 universe, but still not have any effect on us beings of=20 matter.

The question is how can matter have an effect on neutrions? If = they=20 could be captured and changed into energy,


 
The=20 worlds most sensitive Neutrino observatory in Japan detected = less than=20 10 neutrino events from the 1986a supernova, a galaxy away, even = though=20 trillions per square inch per second sleeted through our=20 galaxy.

How do you know there are trillions? if you can't detect = them?

 
Neutrino's may have mass, which means enough of them = exert a=20 gravitational force, but they would be just like any other = matter with=20 gravitational force.

considering your previous writing, this would seeem to be=20 contradictory

Do a=20 search on the Higgs particle and the Higgs Field, and you will = see=20 that.

The last I heard, they were still looking for the Higgs Boson, = did I=20 miss something?

 
Also=20 consider that even though the mind may be powerful enough to = visualize=20 physics like Stephen Hawking, your electrical fields that your = brain=20 creates are several orders of magnitude less than what is = required to=20 influence matter around it.

Have you ever heard of spoon bending? I'd say that this is a = classic=20 example of theory conflicting with observed fact.


Email: tom rhfweb.com

------=_NextPart_000_001C_01C0F275.A07B3B60-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 11 14:49:57 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id OAA04783; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 14:47:24 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 14:47:24 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <014701c0f183$98d85ca0$e2b4bfa8 computer> References: <014701c0f183$98d85ca0$e2b4bfa8 computer> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 16:47:07 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: thomas malloy Subject: Re: Mercury Arc Space Drive? Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Resent-Message-ID: <"3roEH2.0.eA1.gnJ9x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43103 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: > >This comes about because the slow moving heavy positive ion, M+, >striking the cathode have as much as 600 times the momentum as the >stripped electron, e- striking the anode: > >Regards, Frederick What are you saying, that this system would produce a unidirectional force? NASA is looking for things like this. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 11 15:18:23 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id PAA17325; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 15:17:45 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 15:17:45 -0700 Message-ID: <002501c0f2dd$c16e4f20$ef5bccd1 asus> From: "Mike Carrell" To: References: <5.0.2.1.2.20010608173552.02982b20 pop.mindspring.com> <5.0.2.1.2.20010611111201.00a90768@pop.mindspring.com> Subject: Re: Hyrogen fuel economics Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 18:18:50 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Resent-Message-ID: <"irKJz2.0.YE4.8EK9x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43104 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: What the biomass calculations seem to leave out is the capital and energy necessary to produce the biomass. You are basically using plants (how many square miles?) as solar energy converters, and overlooking the very strong temptation to use fertilizers to maximize the plant growth. And where will the fertilizer come from? Petroleum, and the efficiency of conversion to biomass fuel is apt to be low. And have we estimated the energy investment to plant, cultivate, harvest and transport the biomass to the point of use? As for windmills at the local filling station, I doubt that my township would tolerate three windmills at the local intersection where there are three gas stations. And how about the energy density available from the local breeze? The fatal flaw with pure electric cars is the over-150 mile trip when you have to recharge. You can fill your tank with gasoline in five minutes, but it would take much longer to recharge your batteries; your would have a large electrical substation to supply the power demand of a bunch of cars at the turnpike stop. As for swapping batteries, you paid good bucks for the one you brought, what guarantee do you have that the one you picked up won't die on you? We don't have a good system for the transportation of hydrogen, even storing it in your car. As for pipelines, hydrogen has a reputation for being very difficult to contain. The energy density of a mile of hydrogen pipeline is apt to be much less than that same mile filled with gasoline or methanol. Mike Carrell From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 11 15:47:45 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id PAA27259; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 15:47:01 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 15:47:01 -0700 Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20010611183250.00a909d0 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 18:46:34 -0400 To: vortex-l eskimo.com, From: Jed Rothwell Subject: Re: Hyrogen fuel economics In-Reply-To: <002501c0f2dd$c16e4f20$ef5bccd1 asus> References: <5.0.2.1.2.20010608173552.02982b20 pop.mindspring.com> <5.0.2.1.2.20010611111201.00a90768 pop.mindspring.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <"w0lv73.0.Sf6.YfK9x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43105 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Mike Carrell wrote: >What the biomass calculations seem to leave out is the capital and energy >necessary to produce the biomass. Yes. I think most biomass schemes use materials left over from agriculture, which would otherwise be left to rot. Here in Georgia peanut shells are mixed with coal and burned, with good control over pollution. >As for windmills at the local filling station, I doubt that my township >would tolerate three windmills at the local intersection where there are >three gas stations. Many townships in Europe, New York, California, Iowa and elsewhere allow windmills in areas close to roads. I did not mean the windmill would be directly over the road or filling station, in the literal sense, I meant it would be about as far away as the small oil pumps you see by the side of the road in Texas and other oil-producing states. The only danger would come from the storage tanks. Obviously, safety engineering would be needed. Excess electricity or gas could be sent through the distribution network, but most of the energy would be used then and there. This would reduce the burden on the distribution network, by bringing the consumers (cars) to the energy source. > And how about the energy density available from the >local breeze? This would only be done in areas with lots of wind. > The fatal flaw with pure electric cars is the over-150 mile trip when > you have to recharge. You can fill your tank with gasoline in five > minutes, but it would take much longer to recharge your batteries . . . Batteries with much greater capacity per kilogram and batteries that can recharge in a few minutes have been developed, but they are not economical. They may never be. >As for swapping batteries, you paid good bucks for the one you brought, >what guarantee do you have that the one you picked up won't die on you? The battery would be the property of the power company. You would turn in a defective one at the next turnpike stop, and not think twice about it. This would work the same way as the distribution of natural gas in small tanks from hardware stores like Home Depot in Atlanta. You don't own the tank; you return it when it is empty. >We don't have a good system for the transportation of hydrogen, even >storing it in your car. That is a major technical problem. >As for pipelines, hydrogen has a reputation for being very difficult to >contain. Another serious problem. > The energy density of a mile of hydrogen pipeline is >apt to be much less than that same mile filled with gasoline or methanol. I do not think energy density is much of a problem, because it costs very little to transport even at low density. - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 11 16:51:59 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id QAA19398; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 16:51:27 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 16:51:27 -0700 Message-ID: <030e01c0f2c8$af35e620$e2b4bfa8 computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: References: <5.0.2.1.2.20010611154920.029be7f0 pop.mindspring.com> Subject: Re: Hyrogen fuel economics - Part about Fred's statement Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 17:47:35 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Resent-Message-ID: <"kzB3W1.0.yk4.zbL9x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43106 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jed Rothwell" To: ; Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 3:14 PM Subject: Hyrogen fuel economics - Part about Fred's statement Jed wrote: > Frederick Sparber wrote: > > >At what cost Jed? It takes 25 Kw-Hr per pound of Hydrogen produced. At > >$.10/ kw-hr and 55,000 btu/lb heat of combustion for H2 you are getting > >close to $2.50 for the energy equivalent of a gallon of gasoline or diesel. Actually Jed, it takes 54 kw-hr to electrolyze water to 2.16 lbs of H2 which at the low 51,593 btu/lb heat value of combustion of H2. This equals the low heat value of combustion of a gallon of gasoline.At $0.10/kw-hr it would be equivalent to 112,000 btu/gallon gasoline priced at $5.40/gallon. > > I should have agreed that the cycle Fred describes is completely out of the > question. He is talking about the heat of combustion of H2, or in other > words, burning H2 in something like a conventional ICE. It is even worse > than he estimated: > > CURRENT TECHNOLOGY > > Averaged fossil fuels to electricity to hydrogen > 71.9 units of input energy for each unit of propulsion energy delivered > 71.4 thousand dollars per kilowatt capital cost (same 71 by coincidence) > 22.6 kg CO2/kWh > 62.9 grams NOx/kWh > 169.6 grams SO2/kWh > > This is 7.6 times less efficient than conventional ICE, and 8.4 times more > expensive in capital costs. As I said earlier, no one has advocated this > scheme as far as I know. It would be economic lunacy -- kind of the > Japanese breeder reactor program. Hydrogen produced by other means and then > used in a fuel cell has much more promise. > > In the cycle Fred described, electrolysis is 65% efficient, bulk storage > and vehicle on board storage are both 65% efficient, and the ICE is only 18%. > > A fuel cell is roughly 50% efficient. Which means that you can get 0.5*51,593 btu = 25,797 btu = 7.56 kw-hr electrical output/lb H2. > "Advanced Technology" electrolysis > and gas storage are both projected at 75% efficient. Those DOE Lab "projections" have been around for 50 years. :-) > Combining advanced > techniques, from fossil fuel => electricity => fuel cell it ends up taking > 12.9 units of energy to produce 1 unit of vehicle propulsion, which still > makes no economic sense. Other techniques such as natural gas => hydrogen > or even gasoline => hydrogen on-board reformulating have more promise. I think Veep Cheney has his eye on Wyoming Coal gasification to produce Water Gas (CO + H2). This was used in the late 1800s for heating and lighting. Except now there is a shift catalyst to convert the CO: CO + H2O ---> CO2 + H2 + Heat Overall this will use about 6.0 tons of coal to produce a ton of H2 and 22 tons of CO2. Plus mercury and other heavy metals to pollute the air. Also CO + H2 over a Nickel (hydrogenation catalyst) with a molecular sieve produces pipeline quality Methane, SNG. Regards, Frederick > > - Jed > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 11 17:04:50 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id RAA24109; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 17:02:55 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 17:02:55 -0700 From: Robin van Spaandonk To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Atlanta traffic problem solved Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 10:02:21 +1000 Organization: Improving Message-ID: References: <5.0.2.1.2.20010611152340.0292e9b8 pop.mindspring.com> In-Reply-To: <5.0.2.1.2.20010611152340.0292e9b8 pop.mindspring.com> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id RAA24079 Resent-Message-ID: <"Oohjn2.0.bu5.lmL9x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43107 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Mon, 11 Jun 2001 15:37:02 -0400: [snip] >improvements. If the U.S. is incapable of doing this, as our political >leaders apparently believe, then we can buy all the technology we need from >our economic rivals, who manage to squeeze three times more GDP out of >their fuel than we get out of ours. > >- Jed [snip] Hi Jed, It occurs to me that the ratio you mention would probably be affected by population density, in as much as lower density leads to longer travel distances and consequently higher fuel consumption. IOW the lower population density of the US could be the main reason for the lower efficiency, rather than any inherent local failing. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 11 17:12:48 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id RAA27853; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 17:11:10 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 17:11:10 -0700 Message-ID: <031e01c0f2cb$71f5f040$e2b4bfa8 computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: Cc: References: <5.0.2.1.2.20010608173552.02982b20 pop.mindspring.com> <5.0.2.1.2.20010611111201.00a90768@pop.mindspring.com> <002501c0f2dd$c16e4f20$ef5bccd1@asus> Subject: Re: Hyrogen fuel economics Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 18:08:18 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Resent-Message-ID: <"R_LRh1.0.wo6.TuL9x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43108 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Carrell" To: Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 8:18 PM Subject: Re: Hyrogen fuel economics Mike Carrell wrote: > What the biomass calculations seem to leave out is the capital and energy > necessary to produce the biomass. Ever been around a combine or corn harvester Mike? For every bushel of wheat or corn (60 pounds or 56 pounds) there are 60 and 56 pounds of biomass wastes thrown on the ground to air oxidize back to CO2. These could be collected and processed with the same logistics as the food crops. I suggest that you do a web search on biomass gasification and energy farming. :-) >You are basically using plants (how many > square miles?) as solar energy converters, and overlooking the very strong > temptation to use fertilizers to maximize the plant growth. Yep a nuclear reactor 93 million miles away and no nuclear wastes to contend with. Where do you think those fossil fuels came from? > And where will > the fertilizer come from? It's called ash, Mike. And Legme crop rotation can handle the fixed nitrogen problem. >Petroleum, and the efficiency of conversion to > biomass fuel is apt to be low. And have we estimated the energy investment > to plant, cultivate, harvest and transport the biomass to the point of use? You're asking questions there were asked and answered decades ago. > > As for windmills at the local filling station, I doubt that my township > would tolerate three windmills at the local intersection where there are > three gas stations. How many cellular phone transponders will your township tolerate. :-) >And how about the energy density available from the > local breeze? The fatal flaw with pure electric cars is the over-150 mile > trip when you have to recharge. You can fill your tank with gasoline in five > minutes, but it would take much longer to recharge your batteries; your > would have a large electrical substation to supply the power demand of a > bunch of cars at the turnpike stop. As for swapping batteries, you paid good > bucks for the one you brought, what guarantee do you have that the one you > picked up won't die on you? > > We don't have a good system for the transportation of hydrogen, even storing > it in your car. As for pipelines, hydrogen has a reputation for being very > difficult to contain. The energy density of a mile of hydrogen pipeline is > apt to be much less than that same mile filled with gasoline or methanol. Cynic. :-) Regards, Frederick > > Mike Carrell > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 11 18:30:49 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id SAA02105; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 18:29:23 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 18:29:23 -0700 From: FZNIDARSIC aol.com Message-ID: Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 21:28:40 EDT Subject: The latest on gravity control and LLNR To: vortex-l eskimo.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_da.796f0c6.2856ca48_boundary" X-Mailer: AOL 6.0 for Windows US sub 10524 Resent-Message-ID: <"Onz891.0.nW.o1N9x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43109 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: --part1_da.796f0c6.2856ca48_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I tied my ideas into Schrodinger's wave equation. This is another advance. http://www.members.aol.com/fznidarsic/schrod.html Visit my html Frank Znidarsic --part1_da.796f0c6.2856ca48_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I tied my ideas into Schrodinger's wave equation.  This is another advance.

http://www.members.aol.com/fznidarsic/schrod.html


Visit my html

Frank Znidarsic
--part1_da.796f0c6.2856ca48_boundary-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 11 18:53:33 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id SAA17199; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 18:52:59 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 18:52:59 -0700 Message-ID: <000901c0f300$250c8160$58b286ac default> From: "Thomas D. Clark" To: "prj" , "vortex" Cc: "Thomas D. Clark" Subject: New Age Town Designs, Free Energy, Force Fields, & Support, Recommenations, & Donations Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 22:25:47 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3612.1700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3612.1700 X-Apparently-From: ConexTom aol.com Resent-Message-ID: <"l-SY51.0.eC4.wNN9x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43110 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: I am presently seeking donations, designs, and support for the design and implementation of a New Age Small Town with New Age technologies such as free energy, privacy force fields, and other self sustaining and clean environmentally friendly technologies. I am already very close to developing free energy technologies and force fields. I am looking for some money to hire an architect to design a self sustaining small town which may utilize new age technologies. If I complete the architectural designs then I would seek donations to build the town in a friendly country such as in Canada or Scotland or the U.S. I may file international patents to allow free technologies to be used in the town. It is my goel to give the world a new hope by building such a town for others see and copy in their own countries, to help save the environment and the future of humanity. For further information on my present plans please check out my web site at www.rhfweb.com\newage.html. * Any donations recieved for the New Age Town are not tax deductable since they are not for nonprofit purposes and would be filed under the New Age Media Productions Company at www.rhfweb.com\newage.html which is a for profit organization and not under the Radiation Health Foundation at www.rhfweb.com which is tax excempt for non profit purposes for new energy and radiation research. If you are interested in making donations or have comments, recommendation, or requests about any of the above programs please send me an email to mailto:tom rhfweb.com Thank you! Respectively, President, Thomas Clark Radiation Health Foundation (RHF) Inc., RHF Buisness web site at: http://www.rhfweb.com/ Personal website at http://www.rhfweb.com/personal New Age Media Productions at http://www.rhfweb.com/newage Email: tom rhfweb.com From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 11 19:51:31 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id TAA23608; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 19:50:40 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 19:50:40 -0700 Message-ID: <034e01c0f2e1$bb5ef5e0$e2b4bfa8 computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: Cc: Subject: Re: Ammonia Fuel Cells Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 20:46:37 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Resent-Message-ID: <"tUtLq1.0.om5.0EO9x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43111 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: A relatively inexpensive way to store hydrogen is to use the Haber ammonia synthesis process that produces megatons of anhydrous ammonia (and Urea) for agricultural fertilizer and industrial use: 3 H2 + N2 ---> 2 NH3 (liquid under pressure) + heat 6 lb. 28 lb. 34 lb. For agricultural use, the ammonia is stored in tanks, with some tanks mounted on wheels and towed to the fields where the NH3 is injected into the soil. I found a few ammonia fuel cell references on the web. There are ammonia decomposition catalysts that reverse the Haber reaction. All in all ammonia is environmentally friendly, and judging by the odor around an outdoor privy you don't have any problem detecting it before it reaches toxic levels. Regards, Frederick From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 11 20:47:50 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id UAA25896; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 20:46:21 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 20:46:21 -0700 From: Hypercom59 aol.com Message-ID: Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 23:45:41 EDT Subject: Buy into Pulsed Plasma international patents To: vortex-l eskimo.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows 95 sub 120 Resent-Message-ID: <"y0yLI3.0.IK6.C2P9x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43112 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Buy into Pulsed Plasma international patents On 6/20/01 is the deadline for the international patents on my Pulsed Plasma device. After that date I loose the priority rights to international protection. Here is the offer plain and simple. The total expected cost to finalize patents in the 18 states making up the European group is expected to be between $24,000 and $39,000. Anyone or any group that accepts the responsibility of these payments to the successful issue of such patents (Directly to the London law firm - not to me) shall be assigned 10% of those international patents. Should other countries be chosen for filing, the cost is more and set by the PCT and the law firms charges. I am not asking for any money, just assistance in filing for protection of this unusual invention. The fee required by 6/20/01 by the firm is $5600, should you pay this and later decide not to proceed - your loss is limited to that filing fee based on European states. If you have any questions please email. Should 6 people want to each invest $1000 each to secure the right to proceed, that is up to you. The offer self terminates at the end of business, 6/20/01 London time, if they do not have the initial payment. I will forward their letter to any that ask for it for review. ~$40,000 buys 10% of the European rights to the most unusual patent in over 30 years, Philo Farnsworths IEC Fusion was pretty strange way back then. But his original idea was from ~1939. Best Regards, Chris Arnold information is at: http://members.aol.com/hypercom59/index.html From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 11 21:19:44 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id VAA12635; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 21:18:55 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 21:18:55 -0700 From: dtmiller midiowa.net (Dean T. Miller) To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Hyrogen fuel economics Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 04:18:36 GMT Organization: Miller and Associates Message-ID: <3b2a978a.126917133 mail.midiowa.net> References: <5.0.2.1.2.20010608173552.02982b20 pop.mindspring.com> <5.0.2.1.2.20010611111201.00a90768@pop.mindspring.com> <002501c0f2dd$c16e4f20$ef5bccd1@asus> In-Reply-To: <002501c0f2dd$c16e4f20$ef5bccd1 asus> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.5/32.452 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id VAA12588 Resent-Message-ID: <"lZEqg1.0.L53.kWP9x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43113 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: On Mon, 11 Jun 2001 18:18:50 -0700, "Mike Carrell" wrote: >As for windmills at the local filling station, I doubt that my township >would tolerate three windmills at the local intersection where there are >three gas stations. And if there's no other economic choice? >We don't have a good system for the transportation of hydrogen, even storing >it in your car. As for pipelines, hydrogen has a reputation for being very >difficult to contain. The energy density of a mile of hydrogen pipeline is >apt to be much less than that same mile filled with gasoline or methanol. Again, what if there's no other economic choice? We may find out in a decade or two (unless T. Gold's right). -- Dean -- from (almost) Des Moines -- KB0ZDF From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 11 21:35:57 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id VAA21923; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 21:34:41 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 21:34:41 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: rick mail.highsurf.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: <5.0.2.1.2.20010611152340.0292e9b8 pop.mindspring.com> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 18:33:42 -1000 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Rick Monteverde Subject: Re: Atlanta traffic problem solved Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Resent-Message-ID: <"Pszt23.0.JM5.WlP9x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43114 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Reminds me of a Dilbert comic strip I saw once - a computer superstore salesman is pitching his wares: "... and this computer over here is really great because it never crashes - as long as you don't try to run software on it." - Rick Monteverde Honolulu, HI From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 12 01:23:45 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id BAA25220; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 01:22:51 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 01:22:51 -0700 From: Robin van Spaandonk To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Aquino info on Anti Gravity - Meland Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 18:22:13 +1000 Organization: Improving Message-ID: References: <3B24DA92.CCE58B4D bellsouth.net> <022801c0f28d$61e0b200$e2b4bfa8@computer> <3B252140.7A5E13BF@bellsouth.net> In-Reply-To: <3B252140.7A5E13BF bellsouth.net> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id BAA25195 Resent-Message-ID: <"uQZ7_.0.z96.Q5T9x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43115 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Mon, 11 Jun 2001 15:51:28 -0400: [snip] >Here's the image: > >http://www.icnet.net/users/chrish/cropcir.html > >So, if someone is really trying to communicate with cereal >geometry, then what do all these other images mean?? > >http://www.lovely.clara.net/homepg.html > >Terry They're all physics lessons. Some represent the inner workings of the atom. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 12 03:10:04 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id DAA19580; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 03:09:23 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 03:09:23 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: temalloy metro.lakes.com (Unverified) Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 05:08:39 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: thomas malloy Subject: reactionless drives? Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Resent-Message-ID: <"fprUb1.0.sn4.IfU9x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43116 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: > > >Perhaps an analogy will make the point more clearly. Suppose a bum is inside a locked railway car, which is sitting on a frictionless track. He >the opposite end of the car, the entire displacement of the car will be >undone. > Hum, OTOH, Bob Cook says that his drive does exactly that. I just finished reading through your post on the etherons Mitchell. It's an interesting theory, however I can't see how I'm going to be able to get along without the right hand and left hand rule. I'm going to forward your post to Pat Bailey and see what he thinks about this. Your theory reminds me of John E W Keeley's theories. have you seen his drawings explaining his theories about particles that are smaller than electrons? See www.svpvril.com . I can't help thinking that if Cook is right, and I have reason to believe that he is, then the drive has to be reacting against something. IMHO, that something has to be the Aether. Also IMHO, we have to get to the bottom of this. If Cook is right, we need a new paradigm of physics. Once we have that we can move forward, not until. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 12 03:10:06 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id DAA19644; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 03:09:37 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 03:09:37 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: temalloy metro.lakes.com (Unverified) Message-Id: Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 05:08:39 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: thomas malloy Subject: time dilation fields Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Resent-Message-ID: <"TxPyj3.0.so4.WfU9x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43117 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Fellow Vortexians; Last night Art Bell replayed an interview with Dr. David Anderson. of time travel associates. http://www.time-travel.com/ The doctor has a laboratory on Long Island in which he has created a plasma generator which produces a time dilation. According to him, a clock placed in the field will go 3 times as fast as a similar clock outside of it. The field is produced by intense magnetic fields interacting with a rotating electromagnetic field and a laser ring requiring 12 lasers. The lasers ionize the gas which opens the field. During the interview a young woman named Ann called in and asked him some very interesting questions, She wanted to know if he was using a Squid interface, he was not. She wanted to know how he was controlling the field, He replied that it was controled by 6 injector sensor arrays. which had 43 data points from the 6 arrays which feed data into the control system. She wanted to know if he was experiencing residual field difusion. He replied that they were. He went on to say that when they retard the time field the field becomes unstable. The inner field becomes unstable and the field collapses. This spreading of the inner shell destroys biological organisms in the field. The control mechanism is based on the data collected by interferometers which feeds data into the control system. The biggest problem that they are having is modeling the field. Ann started questioning him about fuzzy logic and some other mathematical modeling system, but Art cut her off. That's what I hate most about Art, is his cutting callers off. During the February interview ( when it was run live ) I heard this caller and I am pleased to be able to share this interaction with you all. What follows was in the first part of the interview. Once the field is established the amount of energy required to maintain it decreases. The reason for this is not understood. The plasma surrounding the field produces a doppler effect which distorts the color of the object in the field until it turns black. During the mathematical theorizing about this, the doctor solved the problem of satellite's failure to be where they were predicted to be. I don't know if this explains the present position of the Voyager's or not. The doctor's theorizing accounts for frame dragging which I would assume would only apply in the vicinity of a planet. Frame dragging is the distortion in space which occurs in the vicinity of a planetary body as a result of it's rotation. The magnetic field of the planet contributes to this effect too. I've been looking for an explanation of frame dragging. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 12 06:03:16 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id GAA02111; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 06:02:13 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 06:02:13 -0700 Message-ID: <038201c0f337$280f0e00$e2b4bfa8 computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: Cc: Subject: Re: Mercury Arc Space Drive? Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 06:59:22 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Resent-Message-ID: <"GdpRe.0.qW.KBX9x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43118 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Hi Keith. While Mitchell Jones is busy slinging mud in a boxcar, could you see your way clear to set your ignitron on a digital scale and fire it using one or two 12 volt storage batteries? The 10 to 20 volt drop across the ignitron should allow at least 300 amperes for a few minutes or so before you have to cool it. At 300 amperes you Might get about 180 grams of weight increase, or you might not get any, in which case you can use it as a hot water heater. :-) From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 12 07:31:42 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id HAA06825; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 07:30:52 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 07:30:52 -0700 Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20010612095925.0292dc40 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 10:30:45 -0400 To: vortex-l eskimo.com, vortex-l@eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: Re: Atlanta traffic problem solved In-Reply-To: References: <5.0.2.1.2.20010611152340.0292e9b8 pop.mindspring.com> <5.0.2.1.2.20010611152340.0292e9b8 pop.mindspring.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <"_jCqa2.0.Zg1.QUY9x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43119 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Robin van Spaandonk wrote: >. . . we can buy all the technology we need from > >our economic rivals, who manage to squeeze three times more GDP out of > >their fuel than we get out of ours. > > >It occurs to me that the ratio you mention would probably be affected by >population density, in as much as lower density leads to longer travel >distances and consequently higher fuel consumption. Longer travel and greater use of automobiles is a contributing factor, but it cannot explain the entire difference. Compare the percentages: U.S. Japan Industry 38% 50% Transportation 26% 19% In China, population density is high and automobile ownership is much lower than the U.S. or Europe, but their productivity is lower than the U.S. The numbers are: Europe and Japan 5,100 Btu per dollar of GDP U.S. 12,600 Btu per dollar India 27,200 Btu per dollar China 30,000 Btu per dollar China in 1980 70,000 Btu per dollar See: http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/cabs/japanenv.html#ENERGY Note: the U.S. numbers have recently been revised upward, from 11,600 to 12,600, and U.S. consumption of renewable energy fell by 1%. The U.S. is sliding into third world status in energy technology. >IOW the lower population density of the US could be the main reason for >the lower efficiency, rather than any inherent local failing. There is no local failing. The failure is at the top, in government and industry. Other countries have active policies to avoid being robbed by OPEC; the U.S. rolls over and plays dead, except when it is time to fight another war for oil. Our energy policies are from the stone age -- literally! Whack other people over the head and grab what you want, instead of finding cheaper, easier ways to make it yourself. The U.S. could easily be the world's largest and most profitable energy exporter, but we choose to import instead, and hand over our wealth to oil moguls in the middle east and Venezuela. The U.S. highway system, particularly in Atlanta, could easily be transformed into the fastest and most convenient transportation system on earth, with just a few minor changes, especially electronic tolls varying by time of day, and computerized jitney services. It would not cost anything; it would save tons of money, and millions of hours of frustration suffered by people stuck in traffic. We do not do it because people lack imagination, they are not willing to try something new, and they do not want to "pay" for something they think they are getting for "free." In fact, they are paying far too much, when you factor in the cost in frustration, lost wages and pollution. This is a problem we have brought upon ourselves by our own stupidity, for no reason, with no compensating benefit to anyone except the oil companies. - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 12 09:04:26 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id JAA28603; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 09:01:27 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 09:01:27 -0700 From: Hypercom59 aol.com Message-ID: Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 11:59:58 EDT Subject: For Atomic Fusion Specialists Only To: vortex-l eskimo.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 5.0 for Windows sub 124 Resent-Message-ID: <"4OHza3.0.U-6.EpZ9x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43120 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: I have specific questions that only Fusion specialists Can answer. If there are any on this list, (and not self taught Library experts) I would like to talk to you. I will not post my questions to you on this or any other list - You decide if I am off my nut, but first I explain what the device is doing. When you say there is to be no further contact - contact terminates. If you are NOT a Fusion expert, please sit this one out. Best Wishes, Chris Arnold http://members.aol.com/hypercom59/index.html From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 12 12:12:19 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id MAA22882; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 12:09:04 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 12:09:04 -0700 Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20010612144542.0294b8a8 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 15:05:36 -0400 To: vortex-L eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: Article about energy and food Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <"_iJyd3.0.Qb5.FZc9x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43121 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Here is a thought-provoking article: Robert Vale & Michael Pritchard, "The Real Cost of Food - A White Paper, An analysis of the environmental impact of food production," , Sustainable Design Research Centre, University of Auckland, June 08, 2001 http://www.evworld.com/databases/storybuilder.cfm?storyid=193 Witty quote: On the basis of these Australian figures, the total energy embodied in the current New Zealand diet represents 150 to 210 PJ (actual consumption of 21 PJ multiplied by embodied energy factor of 7.2 to 10). The national primary energy consumption for New Zealand in 1996 was 665 PJ (Ministry for the Environment, 1997b). If between a quarter and a third of the energy used by the country each year goes to feeding ourselves, how far have we progressed from the hunter/gatherer stage? I have not checked the numbers, but I suspect the estimate of embodied energy in food is too high. I doubt that 25 to 30% of energy is used in food production and transportation. Now that we eat grapes grown in South America this surprisingly high number is plausible. Some other minor quibbles: Rainwater from most roofs already goes to irrigate surrounding gardens and lawns. If it runs off into the gutter, it goes to the sewer system and ends up in the drinking water of people downriver. (Let's not kid ourselves about what we drink.) Household composting of food garbage in urban areas is not practical, or safe. My wife did it for many years, but she was forced to stop by an infestation of mice after the cat died. One can compost grass clippings, leaves, and inedible garbage such as pea pods or coffee grounds. A large vegetable garden also invites vermin, along with innumerable squirrels, rabbits, raccoons, opossums and children, even in urban Atlanta. Opossums have very small brains compared to placental mammals, but not only do they eat vegetables, they somehow managed to eat our pond fish and kill six chickens. It might have been a raccoon, but I blame the 'possums. - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 12 14:19:33 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id OAA17735; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 14:07:14 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 14:07:14 -0700 Message-ID: <000101c0f378$f8256800$e3181ad8 oemcomputer> From: "Bruce Meland" To: Cc: "Matthew Rogers" Subject: Re: Candidate for universal gravitational glue Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 10:20:37 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_008D_01C0F329.530C5620" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Resent-Message-ID: <"FqJ2f.0.oK4.-He9x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43122 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_008D_01C0F329.530C5620 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Matt; Perhaps force can be classically defined as mass x accelleration = or velocity; Well if neutrinos have mass and have above speed of light = velocity or acceleration then possibly gravity can be created of = affected. Neutrino amplifiers? Could be key to anti-gravity and faster = than speed of light propulsion., or perhaps even time manuplation. Sound = far out? Maybe not even good science fiction? All I know is my 2 = inventor contacts have powerful neutrino electric generating devices. = And they each refer to the key energy particle as a form of neutrino. = Maybe I can arrange a demonstration for some deep pocket, anti = establishment types? Anybody know of such a person or company? Bruce=20 -----Original Message----- From: Matthew Rogers To: vortex-l eskimo.com Date: Saturday, June 09, 2001 7:08 PM Subject: RE: Candidate for universal gravitational glue =20 =20 Thomas,=20 =20 Gravity is a force not a particle. Gravity is the weakest force in = the universe. Gravity can exert its force over long distances at the = speed of light. Gravity is the only attractive force that has no known = particle associated with it.=20 =20 When the particle is found that generates the field that causes = gravity and inertia ( the two are equal ) then science will unify all = known forces. =20 Neutrinos have very little interaction with matter, however there is = many of them. If they even have a little mass, then they would have a = large effect of a source of mass on the structure of the universe, but = still not have any effect on us beings of matter. =20 Even the dense core of a Neutron star is essentially transparent to = neutrino=92s. =20 Only a Black hole would have an effect on a neutrino with a 100% = probability, because of the curvature of space is less than one. Thus a = neutrino is treated like any Speed of light particle and prevented from = escapeing the event horizion. If you could create a beam of any speed of = light particle and beam it at a black hole, nothing would come out, not = even the wispy neutrino. =20 The worlds most sensitive Neutrino observatory in Japan detected = less than 10 neutrino events from the 1986a supernova, a galaxy away, = even though trillions per square inch per second sleeted through our = galaxy. =20 Neutrino=92s may have mass, which means enough of them exert a = gravitational force, but they would be just like any other matter with = gravitational force. =20 So what is the property of Mass, and why would different aspects of = mass like inertial mass=3Dgravitational mass. That is still the unknown, and will be till we have a partical = acceleration system powerful enough, or a computing system powerful = enough on existing accelerators to detect the fields and particals that = give matter mass and gravity. =20 Do a search on the Higgs particle and the Higgs Field, and you will = see that. =20 Also consider that even though the mind may be powerful enough to = visualize physics like Stephen Hawking, your electrical fields that your = brain creates are several orders of magnitude less than what is required = to influence matter around it. =20 Consider, everything you do is an interaction with the strongest = force in the universe. Matthew Rogers Prove it.. =20 -----Original Message----- From: ConexTom aol.com [mailto:ConexTom@aol.com] Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2001 7:46 PM To: vortex-l eskimo.com; DEACH@topica.com Cc: tom rhfweb.com Subject: Fwd: Candidate for universal gravitational glue =20 Subj: Fw: Candidate for universal gravitational glue=20 Date: 6/2/01 11:41:42 AM Pacific Daylight Time=20 From: etimes teleport.com (Bruce Meland)=20 To: tom rhfweb.com=20 CC: conextom aol.com=20 =20 Hi Tom I believe some form of these neutrinos are the gravity = particles. Bruce=20 =20 =20 Candidate for universal gravitational glue=20 =20 =20 UPI Science News Thursday June 4 9:34 PM EDT TAKAYAMA, Japan, June 5 = (UPI) -=20 Researchers say they have identifed what may be the unseen = gravitational glue=20 _ the so-called dark matter responsible in part for the evolution of = the=20 universe from the moment of its birth: neutrinos. A serious = candidate for=20 this glue, neutrinos are invisible, sub- atomic particles, created = at the=20 time of the Big Bang, that stream through the Earth, people and = everything=20 else unfettered. The groundbreaking discovery, announced Friday in = Japan by=20 an international team of scientists, was that neutrinos have mass. = Because=20 the particles fill the universe, scientists say, collectively they = may have=20 the force to reverse its expansive course to cause the ``Big = Crunch.'' So=20 fundamental a discovery, they said at Neutrino '98, an international = physics=20 conference in Takayama, Japan, could help explain baffling puzzles = about the=20 nature of matter and the formation of the universe after the Big = Bang. The=20 discovery was the result of a two year, $100 million experiment by = an=20 international team of scientists. Dr. John G. Learned, a University = of Hawaii=20 physicist and one of the lead researchers, told United Press = International,=20 the discovery means neutrinos may account for the many gravitational = forces=20 apparent in astronomical observations that no one has ever been able = to=20 explain. ``This will go down as perhaps the one most important = discovery in=20 science in the decade,'' he said Thursday. ``It means that neutrinos = are=20 surely one of the more massive components of the universe.'' Dr. = David=20 Casper, a University of California-Irvine physicist and another team = member,=20 agreed, asserting the finding will help scientists understand ``how = galaxies=20 and other large scale structures in the universe interact = gravitationally.''=20 Until now, he said, scientists have been puzzled about the movements = of the=20 heavens, knowing that something was missing from their calculations, = and=20 describing the unknown variable as ``dark'' or ``missing'' matter. = This=20 discovery, Learned said, suggests that neutrinos have an aggregate=20 gravitational influence that may eventually be sufficient to reverse = the=20 universal expansion triggered by the Big Bang and cause a ``Big = Crunch.''=20 ``The discovery of neutrino mass is intimately connected with both = the=20 origins and ultimate fate of the universe,'' Casper said. ``We = suspected but=20 did not know that neutrinos had tiny mass. We didn't think of them = as making=20 up a part of our world, but in fact, the universe is full of = neutrinos. Every=20 cubic centimeter of the universe has about 200 or so neutrinos, = which are=20 left over from the Big Bang.'' The finding may also fill in the = blanks in=20 equations aimed at solving how particles acquire mass, ``one of the = deepest=20 unsolved questions of particle physics,'' Casper said. ``This will = help=20 astronomers understand something that puzzles them greatly _ why is = there=20 more gravitational force than they expect from the amount of stuff = the can=20 see out there,'' Casper added. Learned says neutrinos, until now = thought to=20 have no mass, may on the whole turn out to make up ``most of the = mass of the=20 universe. '' The discovery was made at Super-Kamiokande Observatory, = the=20 world's largest elementary particle detector, northwest of Tokyo. = Scientists=20 from 23 institutions in the United States, Japan, Poland and Korea = took part.=20 The team included Dr. Henry Sobel, also of UC-Irvine. Neutrinos, = similar to=20 electrons, have long been known to be a fundamental constituent of = nature.=20 But unlike electrons, neutrinos carry no electric charge, and thus = can pass=20 unimpeded through great distances in matter. This property, along = with their=20 invisibility, has made them extremely difficult to observe. = Scientists have=20 suspected for years that neutrinos might have a very small, but = non-zero,=20 mass, but never before could prove it. Casper said the discovery = won't=20 ``change the life of the average Joe'' but has profound implications = for=20 physicists and astrophysicsts. The finding also suggests, he said, = that the=20 gravitational influence of neutrinos may have been a catalyst for = the=20 collapse of the diffuse primordial gas into more dense regions that=20 eventually spawned galaxies, stars and planets. UC-Irvine issued a = statement=20 on behalf of its scientists asserting that the experiment had = yielded=20 ``results that are outside the standard theory of particle physics, = which=20 describes the fundamental constituents of matter and their = interactions.=20 Until now, there has been no firm evidence that neutrinos possess = mass.'' The=20 evidence was based upon studies of neutrinos created when cosmic = rays bombard=20 the Earth's upper atmosphere, producing storms of secndary particles = that=20 rain down constantly from the heavens. Most neutrinos pass through = the entire=20 planet unscathed, but have been detected passing through the = Super-Kamiokande=20 group's 50,000-ton tank of purified water 1,000 meters beneath the = surface.=20 The scientists noticed the neutrinos oscillated, or changed from one = type of=20 neutrino to another, something that could occur only if they have = mass. They=20 say in a joint statement that neutrinos ``must now be incorporated = into the=20 theoretical models of the structure of matter and that = astrophysicists=20 concerned with finding the 'missing' or 'dark matter' in the = universe must=20 now consider the neutrino as a serious candidate.'' Neutrinos were = created in=20 vast quantities in the first instants after the Big Bang and = permeate the=20 universe, Casper said. ``Because these leftover neutrinos are = everywhere,=20 even if they have a tiny mass, when you add them up, it adds up to = something=20 significant in terms of how galaxies and large scale structures in = the=20 universe gravitationally interact,'' Casper said. ``You have a = zillion things=20 which by themselves have almost no mass, but when you add them all = up, they=20 can have a large scale. This may now guide theorists in answering = the big=20 question _ why does everything have mass?'' Learned said, ``this is=20 fundamental science on the most basic scale,'' and its practical = applications=20 might not become evident for many years. Copyright 1998 by United = Press=20 International All rights reserved=20 =20 Respectively,=20 =20 President, Thomas Clark=20 Radiation Health Foundation (RHF) Inc.,=20 RHF Business web site at: http://www.rhfweb.com/=20 Personal website at http://www.rhfweb.com/personal=20 New Age Media Productions at=20 http://www.rhfweb.com/newage=20 Email: tom rhfweb.com=20 ------=_NextPart_000_008D_01C0F329.530C5620 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Matt; Perhaps force can = be=20 classically defined as mass x accelleration or velocity; Well if = neutrinos have=20 mass and have above speed of light velocity or acceleration then = possibly=20 gravity can be created of affected. Neutrino amplifiers? Could be key to = anti-gravity and faster than speed of light propulsion., or perhaps even = time=20 manuplation. Sound far out? Maybe not even good science fiction? All I = know is=20 my 2 inventor contacts have powerful neutrino electric generating = devices. And=20 they each refer to the key energy particle as a form of neutrino. Maybe = I can=20 arrange a demonstration for some deep pocket, anti establishment types? = Anybody=20 know of such a person or company?    Bruce
-----Original = Message-----
From:=20 Matthew Rogers <matt@accelnet.net>
To: = vortex-l@eskimo.com <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Dat= e:=20 Saturday, June 09, 2001 7:08 PM
Subject: RE: Candidate = for=20 universal gravitational glue

Thomas,=20

 

Gravity=20 is a force not a particle. Gravity is the weakest force in the = universe.=20 Gravity can exert its force over long distances at the speed of = light.=20 Gravity is the only attractive force that has no known particle = associated=20 with it.

 

When=20 the particle is found that generates the field that causes gravity = and=20 inertia ( the two are equal ) then science will unify all known=20 forces.

 

Neutrinos=20 have very little interaction with matter, however there is many of = them. If=20 they even have a little mass, then they would have a large effect of = a=20 source of mass on the structure of the universe, but still not have = any=20 effect on us beings of matter.

 

Even=20 the dense core of a Neutron star is essentially transparent to=20 neutrino’s.

 

Only=20 a Black hole would have an effect on a neutrino with a 100% = probability,=20 because of the curvature of space is less than one. Thus a neutrino = is=20 treated like any Speed of light particle and prevented from = escapeing the=20 event horizion. If you could create a beam of any speed of light = particle=20 and beam it at a black hole, nothing would come out, not even the = wispy=20 neutrino.

 

The=20 worlds most sensitive Neutrino observatory in Japan detected less = than 10=20 neutrino events from the 1986a supernova, a galaxy away, even though = trillions per square inch per second sleeted through our=20 galaxy.

 

Neutrino’s=20 may have mass, which means enough of them exert a gravitational = force, but=20 they would be just like any other matter with gravitational=20 force.

 

So=20 what is the property of Mass, and why would different aspects of = mass like=20 inertial mass=3Dgravitational = mass.

That=20 is still the unknown, and will be till we have a partical = acceleration=20 system powerful enough, or a computing system powerful enough on = existing=20 accelerators to detect the fields and particals that give matter = mass and=20 gravity.

 

Do a=20 search on the Higgs particle and the Higgs Field, and you will see=20 that.

 

Also=20 consider that even though the mind may be powerful enough to = visualize=20 physics like Stephen Hawking, your electrical fields that your brain = creates=20 are several orders of magnitude less than what is required to = influence=20 matter around it.

 

Consider,=20 everything you do is an interaction with the strongest force in the=20 universe.

Matthew = Rogers

Prove it..

<= SPAN=20 class=3DEmailStyle18> 

-----Original=20 Message-----
From:=20 ConexTom aol.com [mailto:ConexTom@aol.com]
Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2001 = 7:46=20 PM
To: = vortex-l eskimo.com;=20 DEACH topica.com
Cc:=20 tom rhfweb.com
Subject:=20 Fwd: Candidate for universal gravitational glue

 

Subj:=20 Fw: Candidate for universal = gravitational=20 glue
Date: 6/2/01 11:41:42 AM Pacific Daylight Time=20
From:   =20 etimes teleport.com (Bruce Meland)
To:    = tom rhfweb.com=20
CC:    conextom aol.com

Hi Tom I = believe=20 some form of these neutrinos are the gravity particles. Bruce=20


Candidate=20 for universal gravitational glue


UPI = Science News=20 Thursday June 4 9:34 PM EDT TAKAYAMA, Japan, June 5 (UPI) - =
Researchers=20 say they have identifed what may be the unseen gravitational glue =
_ the=20 so-called dark matter responsible in part for the evolution of the=20
universe from the moment of its birth: neutrinos. A serious = candidate=20 for
this glue, neutrinos are invisible, sub- atomic particles, = created=20 at the
time of the Big Bang, that stream through the Earth, = people and=20 everything
else unfettered. The groundbreaking discovery, = announced=20 Friday in Japan by
an international team of scientists, was that = neutrinos have mass. Because
the particles fill the universe, = scientists=20 say, collectively they may have
the force to reverse its = expansive=20 course to cause the ``Big Crunch.'' So
fundamental a discovery, = they=20 said at Neutrino '98, an international physics
conference in = Takayama,=20 Japan, could help explain baffling puzzles about the
nature of = matter=20 and the formation of the universe after the Big Bang. The =
discovery was=20 the result of a two year, $100 million experiment by an =
international=20 team of scientists. Dr. John G. Learned, a University of Hawaii=20
physicist and one of the lead researchers, told United Press=20 International,
the discovery means neutrinos may account for the = many=20 gravitational forces
apparent in astronomical observations that = no one=20 has ever been able to
explain. ``This will go down as perhaps = the one=20 most important discovery in
science in the decade,'' he said = Thursday.=20 ``It means that neutrinos are
surely one of the more massive = components=20 of the universe.'' Dr. David
Casper, a University of = California-Irvine=20 physicist and another team member,
agreed, asserting the finding = will=20 help scientists understand ``how galaxies
and other large scale=20 structures in the universe interact gravitationally.''
Until = now, he=20 said, scientists have been puzzled about the movements of the =
heavens,=20 knowing that something was missing from their calculations, and=20
describing the unknown variable as ``dark'' or ``missing'' = matter. This=20
discovery, Learned said, suggests that neutrinos have an = aggregate=20
gravitational influence that may eventually be sufficient to = reverse the=20
universal expansion triggered by the Big Bang and cause a ``Big=20 Crunch.''
``The discovery of neutrino mass is intimately = connected with=20 both the
origins and ultimate fate of the universe,'' Casper = said. ``We=20 suspected but
did not know that neutrinos had tiny mass. We = didn't think=20 of them as making
up a part of our world, but in fact, the = universe is=20 full of neutrinos. Every
cubic centimeter of the universe has = about 200=20 or so neutrinos, which are
left over from the Big Bang.'' The = finding=20 may also fill in the blanks in
equations aimed at solving how = particles=20 acquire mass, ``one of the deepest
unsolved questions of = particle=20 physics,'' Casper said. ``This will help
astronomers understand=20 something that puzzles them greatly _ why is there
more = gravitational=20 force than they expect from the amount of stuff the can
see out = there,''=20 Casper added. Learned says neutrinos, until now thought to
have = no mass,=20 may on the whole turn out to make up ``most of the mass of the =
universe.=20 '' The discovery was made at Super-Kamiokande Observatory, the =
world's=20 largest elementary particle detector, northwest of Tokyo. Scientists =
from 23 institutions in the United States, Japan, Poland and = Korea took=20 part.
The team included Dr. Henry Sobel, also of UC-Irvine. = Neutrinos,=20 similar to
electrons, have long been known to be a fundamental=20 constituent of nature.
But unlike electrons, neutrinos carry no = electric=20 charge, and thus can pass
unimpeded through great distances in = matter.=20 This property, along with their
invisibility, has made them = extremely=20 difficult to observe. Scientists have
suspected for years that = neutrinos=20 might have a very small, but non-zero,
mass, but never before = could=20 prove it. Casper said the discovery won't
``change the life of = the=20 average Joe'' but has profound implications for
physicists and=20 astrophysicsts. The finding also suggests, he said, that the=20
gravitational influence of neutrinos may have been a catalyst = for the=20
collapse of the diffuse primordial gas into more dense regions = that=20
eventually spawned galaxies, stars and planets. UC-Irvine issued = a=20 statement
on behalf of its scientists asserting that the = experiment had=20 yielded
``results that are outside the standard theory of = particle=20 physics, which
describes the fundamental constituents of matter = and=20 their interactions.
Until now, there has been no firm evidence = that=20 neutrinos possess mass.'' The
evidence was based upon studies of = neutrinos created when cosmic rays bombard
the Earth's upper = atmosphere,=20 producing storms of secndary particles that
rain down constantly = from=20 the heavens. Most neutrinos pass through the entire
planet = unscathed,=20 but have been detected passing through the Super-Kamiokande =
group's=20 50,000-ton tank of purified water 1,000 meters beneath the surface. =
The=20 scientists noticed the neutrinos oscillated, or changed from one = type of=20
neutrino to another, something that could occur only if they = have mass.=20 They
say in a joint statement that neutrinos ``must now be = incorporated=20 into the
theoretical models of the structure of matter and that=20 astrophysicists
concerned with finding the 'missing' or 'dark = matter' in=20 the universe must
now consider the neutrino as a serious = candidate.''=20 Neutrinos were created in
vast quantities in the first instants = after=20 the Big Bang and permeate the
universe, Casper said. ``Because = these=20 leftover neutrinos are everywhere,
even if they have a tiny = mass, when=20 you add them up, it adds up to something
significant in terms of = how=20 galaxies and large scale structures in the
universe = gravitationally=20 interact,'' Casper said. ``You have a zillion things
which by = themselves=20 have almost no mass, but when you add them all up, they
can have = a large=20 scale. This may now guide theorists in answering the big =
question _ why=20 does everything have mass?'' Learned said, ``this is
fundamental = science=20 on the most basic scale,'' and its practical applications
might = not=20 become evident for many years. Copyright 1998 by United Press=20
International All rights reserved

Respectively,=20

President, Thomas Clark
Radiation Health Foundation = (RHF) Inc.,=20
RHF Business web site at: http://www.rhfweb.com/ =
Personal=20 website at http://www.rhfweb.com/personal=20
New Age Media Productions at
http://www.rhfweb.com/newage=20
Email: tom@rhfweb.com=20

------=_NextPart_000_008D_01C0F329.530C5620-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 12 14:47:21 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id OAA02944; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 14:45:57 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 14:45:57 -0700 Message-ID: <3B268F50.C4272A4C austininstruments.com> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 16:53:20 -0500 From: John Fields Organization: Austin Instruments,Inc. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.01 [en] (Win95; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com CC: prj , "Thomas D. Clark" Subject: Re: New Age Town Designs, Free Energy, Force Fields, & Support, Recommenations, & Donations X-Priority: 3 (Normal) References: <000901c0f300$250c8160$58b286ac default> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"8zJVy2.0.pj.Jse9x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43123 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Thomas D. Clark wrote: > > I am presently seeking donations, designs, and support for the > design and implementation of a New Age Small Town with > New Age technologies such as free energy, privacy force fields, > and other self sustaining and clean environmentally > friendly technologies. --- Would you please elaborate? That is, would you care to proffer what you have on hand in terms of free energy and 'privacy force fields' and what you mean by "self sustaining and clean environmentally friendly technologies."? --- > I am already very close to developing > free energy technologies and force fields. I am looking for some > money to hire an architect to design a self sustaining small town > which may utilize new age technologies. --- How close are you? Would you care to describe the scope of your work and why you feel you're on the brink of a breakthrough? Which 'may' use new age technologies? What, precisely, do you mean by 'new age technologies', and why do you feel the need to use the qualifier, 'may'? --- > If I complete the architectural > designs then I would seek donations to build the town in a friendly country > such as in Canada or Scotland or the U.S. I may file international patents > to allow free technologies to be used in the town. --- If the technologies are free, then what would be the point of filing international patents? Patents _resrict_ the free dissemination of technology, so your statement that you would "file international patents to allow free technology to be used in the town" is bogus. --- > It is my goel to give the > world a new hope by building such a town for others see and copy in their > own countries, to help save the environment and the future of humanity. > For further information on my present plans please check out my web site at > www.rhfweb.com\newage.html. --- Your URL, according to my ISP, doesn't exist and neither, I suspect, do your professed altruistic motives. Please be assured that I will not contribute to your "cause" and I will do everything within my power to dissuade others from falling into your trap. --- > * Any donations recieved for the New Age Town are not tax deductable > since they are not for nonprofit purposes and would be filed under the New > Age Media Productions Company at www.rhfweb.com\newage.html which is a for > profit organization and not under the Radiation Health Foundation at > www.rhfweb.com > which is tax excempt for non profit purposes for new energy and radiation > research. > > If you are interested in making donations or have comments, recommendation, > or requests about any of the above programs please send me an email to > mailto:tom rhfweb.com > Thank you! > > Respectively, > > President, Thomas Clark > Radiation Health Foundation (RHF) Inc., > RHF Buisness web site at: http://www.rhfweb.com/ > Personal website at http://www.rhfweb.com/personal > New Age Media Productions at > http://www.rhfweb.com/newage > Email: tom rhfweb.com --- It's difficult, considering the "don't flame" policy of this forum, to refrain from trashing you in the way you deserve to be trashed. It is good, however, to be able to let you know (without rancor) how lame you really are. --- To email, please add "nospam" to the end of the subject text. John Fields, Austin Instruments, Inc. El Presidente Austin, Republic of Texas "I speak for my company" http://www.austininstruments.com From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 12 14:53:19 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id OAA04621; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 14:49:36 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 14:49:36 -0700 Message-ID: <000201c0f380$d4cc5be0$d38f85ce computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: Cc: Subject: Re: Lest we forget, membership drive Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 15:46:53 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000F_01C0F356.E72E92A0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Resent-Message-ID: <"oEBwM1.0.x71.lve9x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43124 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: A This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_000F_01C0F356.E72E92A0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit We need more members! With the "New Blood" on vortex-l it's time for a membership drive. http://www.math.ucla.edu/~barry/tortoise/index.html Regards, Frederick ------=_NextPart_000_000F_01C0F356.E72E92A0 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="The Order of the Tortoise.url" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="The Order of the Tortoise.url" [DEFAULT] BASEURL=http://www.math.ucla.edu/~barry/tortoise/index.html [InternetShortcut] URL=http://www.math.ucla.edu/~barry/tortoise/index.html Modified=402FE65080F3C001D9 ------=_NextPart_000_000F_01C0F356.E72E92A0-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 12 16:14:16 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id QAA05269; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 16:10:53 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 16:10:53 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: eskimo.com: billb owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 16:10:33 -0700 (PDT) From: William Beaty To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Bill Beaty? In-Reply-To: <005501c0f1dd$069701c0$cb3dee3f default> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Resent-Message-ID: <"AzTNk3.0.9I1.v5g9x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43125 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: On Sun, 10 Jun 2001, Nick Reiter wrote: > > I think Charlie Ford's point is of high importance here - is everything OK > with our venerable benefactor and guru, Bill B? Maybe someone should try emailing me? I've gotten sucked into playing with a new toy: javascript 3D animation in virtual online worlds. The software is free, check it out: Adobe Atmosphere http://www.amasci.com/atmos.html VERY cool for online education, or holding online chat sessions about devices rendered in 3D. ((((((((((((((((((((( ( ( ( ( (O) ) ) ) ) ))))))))))))))))))))) William J. Beaty SCIENCE HOBBYIST website billb eskimo.com http://www.amasci.com EE/programmer/sci-exhibits science projects, tesla, weird science Seattle, WA 206-789-0775 freenrg-L taoshum-L vortex-L webhead-L From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 12 16:18:27 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id QAA06982; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 16:16:40 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 16:16:40 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: eskimo.com: billb owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 16:16:25 -0700 (PDT) From: William Beaty To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: People going to the Keelynet conference saturday? In-Reply-To: <000201c0f380$d4cc5be0$d38f85ce computer> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Resent-Message-ID: <"sXwOg3.0.Mi1.MBg9x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43126 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Are any Vorts going to be at the "Keelynet Convergence 2001" this weekend? It's in Dallas TX, $130. KEELYNET CONF http://www.keelynet.com/knconf.htm Remember: dry ice + swimming pool = catastrophically reduced buoyancy (and maybe reduced hotel residency too!) ((((((((((((((((((((( ( ( ( ( (O) ) ) ) ) ))))))))))))))))))))) William J. Beaty SCIENCE HOBBYIST website billb eskimo.com http://www.amasci.com EE/programmer/sci-exhibits science projects, tesla, weird science Seattle, WA 206-789-0775 freenrg-L taoshum-L vortex-L webhead-L From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 12 17:07:38 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id RAA28213; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 17:03:24 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 17:03:24 -0700 Message-ID: <004f01c0f391$ace3ed80$2a191ad8 oemcomputer> From: "Bruce Meland" To: Cc: Subject: Re: A parable for Bruce Meland Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 15:47:33 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Resent-Message-ID: <"O3IeX.0.lu6.Btg9x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43127 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: I am extremely busy trying to get our publication and any info I am allowed to publish about neutrinovoltaics will be published in our next issue. The 2 neutrinovoltaics inventors have independently come up with similar technology. One is presently living in a Pacific Island and the other in the midwest. I cannot divulge their technology even if i was given almost all the details. One inventor got a lot of information from long lost Tesla Notes and the other figured it out by searching works by Hendershot, Keely and Tesla. They are seeking rather large amounts of funding and are willing to demonstrate the technology to the right partys. Some of the name calling on this list is counterproductive and is indicitative of low level technicians. A truce on this kind of activity would be in the best interest of all concerned. -----Original Message----- From: Keith Nagel To: Bruce Meland Cc: Vortex Date: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 10:01 PM Subject: RE: A parable for Bruce Meland >Well Bruce, are you ready to provide us with some factual information >about the increasing bizarre claims you've been making on vortex? >Or more black helicopters, disappearing prototypes, mystery inventors... > >Jed pointed out the reality of suppression, but I'd like to add one >more point. Disinformation can be spread about a subject to the point >where it becomes impossible for any intelligent dialog to occur. >I used to think such actions were orchestrated, but now feel >it's an organic process. Perhaps an expression of Freud's Thanatos? > >Instead of making a lot of specious assumptions about me and the >rest of the list members, how about some real information or >discussion? > >K. > >-----Original Message----- >From: Bruce Meland [mailto:etimes teleport.com] >Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 4:16 PM >To: knagel gis.net; Vortex >Subject: Re: A parable for Bruce Meland > > >Keith you are the one that is nieve and probably some low level technician >that is living in the past or with very regimented classic electrodynamics >perceptions. I just happen to get around and have been networking with real >inventors, not stuck in some little shop or garage cranking out printed >circuit boards or the stuck in corner of some establishment corp. shop. >This technology has nothing to do with religion or a parable. Just some >wizzard inventors, one with a PHD in EE and good at origional work and not >the regurgitaor type that ends up at some University. One of the wizzards >was key developer of fiber optics. Keith you just have blinders on! Bruce >From: Keith Nagel >To: Vortex >Date: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 12:27 PM >Subject: A parable for Bruce Meland > > >>Hi All. >> >>Many moons ago, I had the experience of working with a Born >>Again Christian. You know the type. Anyway, he kept trying >>to convert the heathens in the office to the one true faith. >>One day, the following exchange took place. >> >>Bob: "Blah Blah accept Jesus blah blah going to hell etc etc" >> >>Me: "Bob, do you mean to say that if I don't accept jesus I'm going to >hell" >> >>Bob : "Yes!" >> >>Me: "OK. What about if I never heard of Jesus. Do I automatically go to >>hell?" >> >>Bob: "uhhh, I suppose so yes" >> >>Me: "Hmm... What about babys, buddhists, etc." >> >>Bob: "uhmmmmmmm yeah" >> >>Me: "Damn Bob, that seems pretty cruel. Babies?" >> >>Bob: long pause...furrowed brow "OK, what happens is they go to limbo and >>get judged >> on individual merit" >> >>Me: "So, basically, what you're trying to do is maximize the number of >souls >> going to heaven, hence the prosteletizing?" >> >>Bob: "Yup" >> >>Me: "So if you succeed in convincing me, I go to heaven" >> >>Bob: sensing victory "Yes!" >> >>Me: "and if you fail, if your oratory skills are insufficient or your >> logic is unappealing, or I feel bad 'cause my girlfriend fought >> with me, and I don't accept this, I go to hell" >> >>Bob: "Uhmm Yeah." >> >>Me: "That's a lot of responsibility Bob. I may live a good life, but >because >> of your inability to argue a point, to present any factual data >> to back up your claim, I'm damned to hell. Just for hearing you" >> >>Bob: Blinks. >> >>Me: "So it would seem, that the best way to maximize the number of good >> souls in heaven, is to keep this a great secret. Don't tell anyone. >> Then, we'll be judged on merit and not on your ability to argue, >> which frankly is greatly lacking. >> >>Bob: Mouth opens. >> >>Me: "Already you've damned half the department to an eternity of torment. >> Please stop." >> >> >> > > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 12 17:25:38 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id RAA06567; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 17:25:11 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 17:25:11 -0700 Message-ID: <005e01c0f394$b9cb6d40$2a191ad8 oemcomputer> From: "Bruce Meland" To: Cc: "prj" , "Thomas D. Clark" Subject: Re: New Age Town Designs, Free Energy, Force Fields, & Support, Recommenations, & Donations Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 16:09:23 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Resent-Message-ID: <"LmfMY3.0.Tc1.dBh9x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43128 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Hi John; At what locations in these countries do you have in mind? Might be best to visit the Methernitha Christain Community in the Swiss Alps. They are the only community that has a workable free energy device. I recommend getting the recently published book "The Search For Free Energy" by Keith Tutt which has dedicated a whole chapter to the Thesta-Distatica overunity device. In 1986 NASA offered a large sum of money for the secrets of the device but they were turned down by the M. community. Bruce -----Original Message----- From: John Fields To: vortex-l eskimo.com Cc: prj ; Thomas D. Clark Date: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 2:50 PM Subject: Re: New Age Town Designs, Free Energy, Force Fields, & Support, Recommenations, & Donations >Thomas D. Clark wrote: >> >> I am presently seeking donations, designs, and support for the >> design and implementation of a New Age Small Town with >> New Age technologies such as free energy, privacy force fields, >> and other self sustaining and clean environmentally >> friendly technologies. > >--- >Would you please elaborate? That is, would you care to proffer what you >have on hand in terms of free energy and 'privacy force fields' and what >you mean by "self sustaining and clean environmentally >friendly technologies."? >--- > >> I am already very close to developing >> free energy technologies and force fields. I am looking for some >> money to hire an architect to design a self sustaining small town >> which may utilize new age technologies. > >--- >How close are you? Would you care to describe the scope of your work >and why you feel you're on the brink of a breakthrough? > >Which 'may' use new age technologies? What, precisely, do you mean by >'new age technologies', and why do you feel the need to use the >qualifier, 'may'? >--- > >> If I complete the architectural >> designs then I would seek donations to build the town in a friendly country >> such as in Canada or Scotland or the U.S. I may file international patents >> to allow free technologies to be used in the town. > >--- >If the technologies are free, then what would be the point of filing >international patents? >Patents _resrict_ the free dissemination of technology, so your >statement that you would "file international patents to allow free >technology to be used in the town" is bogus. >--- > >> It is my goel to give the >> world a new hope by building such a town for others see and copy in their >> own countries, to help save the environment and the future of humanity. >> For further information on my present plans please check out my web site at >> www.rhfweb.com\newage.html. > >--- >Your URL, according to my ISP, doesn't exist and neither, I suspect, do >your professed altruistic motives. Please be assured that I will not >contribute to your "cause" and I will do everything within my power to >dissuade others from falling into your trap. >--- > > >> * Any donations recieved for the New Age Town are not tax deductable >> since they are not for nonprofit purposes and would be filed under the New >> Age Media Productions Company at www.rhfweb.com\newage.html which is a for >> profit organization and not under the Radiation Health Foundation at >> www.rhfweb.com >> which is tax excempt for non profit purposes for new energy and radiation >> research. >> >> If you are interested in making donations or have comments, recommendation, >> or requests about any of the above programs please send me an email to >> mailto:tom rhfweb.com >> Thank you! >> >> Respectively, >> >> President, Thomas Clark >> Radiation Health Foundation (RHF) Inc., >> RHF Buisness web site at: http://www.rhfweb.com/ >> Personal website at http://www.rhfweb.com/personal >> New Age Media Productions at >> http://www.rhfweb.com/newage >> Email: tom rhfweb.com > > >--- >It's difficult, considering the "don't flame" policy of this forum, to >refrain from trashing you in the way you deserve to be trashed. It is >good, however, to be able to let you know (without rancor) how lame you >really are. >--- > >To email, please add "nospam" to the end of the subject text. > >John Fields, Austin Instruments, Inc. >El Presidente Austin, Republic of Texas >"I speak for my company" http://www.austininstruments.com > > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 12 18:37:15 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id SAA03560; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 18:35:49 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 18:35:49 -0700 Message-ID: <003901c0f39e$946679a0$8c181ad8 oemcomputer> From: "Bruce Meland" To: "Thomas D. Clark" , Cc: Subject: Fw: The Search For Free Energy - UK Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 17:19:53 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Resent-Message-ID: <"nYizc2.0.Qt.qDi9x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43129 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: This book has a lot of info on the Swiss ML Converter=Thesta-Distatica free energy machine. by the Christain Methernitha Community in the Swiss Alps. >http://www.thesearchforfreeenergy.com > >THE SEARCH FOR FREE ENERGY >A Scientific Tale Of Jealousy, Genius And Electricity >by Keith Tutt >Simon & Schuster, 2001, Hardcover >ISBN: 0-684-86660-9 (368 pages, £18.99) >NON-FICTION / POPULAR SCIENCE > >Foreword by Sir Arthur C. Clarke > >- Nikola Tesla - Electricity's Hidden Genius >- T.H. Moray - Capturing the Energy of the Universe >- The N-machine - Michael Faraday's Mysterious Legacy >- A Secret in the Swiss Mountains - Paul Baumann and the Thesta-Distatica >- Cold Fusion Comes of Age >- Randell Mills - Blacklight's Power Struggle >- Zero-point Physics and the Cosmic Free Lunch >- Conspiracies, Charlatans and Sceptics >- Envisaging a New Energy Future > >Author Information > >Keith Tutt studied psychology and philosophy at Bristol University before >becoming a full-time writer in 1981. Since then he has written plays, >screenplays and documentary scripts for television. Keith has also produced >a number of science and environmental TV programmes for the BBC. In 1993 he >was a winner of the prestigious BT Science Journalism of the Year Award for >his documentary 'Killing Us Softly?' about the Sizewell 'B' nuclear power >station. Keith lives in Norfolk, England, with his wife, BAFTA award winning >artist Hannah Giffard, and their three children. > >EDITORIAL REVIEW - What Simon and Schuster say about 'The Search for Free >Energy'. > >The Search for Free Energy' reveals the revolutionary work of inventors and >scientists who are developing clear and 'fuelless' new ways to produce the >electricity we need for the twenty-first century and beyond. Here are the >technologies that could drastically change the economic, political and >environmental conditions of the world we live in for the better. If they can >be developed commercially, they offer almost costless energy, the end of the >oil economy and the 'democritisation' of electricity throughout the >developed and underdeveloped world. > >Drawing on extensive and revealing new research, 'The Search for Free >Energy' uncovers the extraordinary lives of the inventors and scientists >behind these technologies and the power struggles that face those who >challenge the scientific status quo. 'The Search for Free Energy' contains >the elements of a dramatic conspiracy thriller in which greed, mendacity, >murder, suicide, suppression, betrayal, jealousy, madness, and misunderstood >genius all play their full parts. It also investigates the complex >psychology of invention and the claims that some inventors are either >self-deluded mavericks or charlatans who aim to trick gullible investors out >of their savings. > >Most importantly, there are technologies here that offer to solve the >planet's most serious problem: global warming and climate change caused by >fossil fuel power plants and car emissions. Is the technological solution to >global warming contained within these pages? > >NEW SCIENTIST REVIEW - 28/4/2001 > >'Everything Has a Price' > >'The Search for Free Energy: A Scientific Tale of Jealousy, Genius and >Electricity' by Keith Tutt >with a foreword by Sir Arthur C. Clarke. > >The Croatian-American inventor Nikola Tesla was seriously weird. He soothed >his head with x-rays, attempted communication with Mars and proposed >broadcasting power by wireless. But however strange his approach, Telsa was >also the originator of the rotating magnetic field that led to the >alternating current (AC) electric motor and three-phase AC - key >technologies that shaped traditional electricity systems throughout the 20th >century. > >Compared to Tesla, most of the dramatis personae in Keith Tutt's account of >The Search for Free Energy seem reassuringly normal. But to those who >accept the conventions of modern physics their ideas are at least as weird >as Telsa's. Anyone even moderately acquainted with the first and second >laws of thermodynamics or classical quantum theory is likely to back away >hastily when offered devices that purport to yield more energy than they >need to operate. > >But the inventors of the Radiant Energy Device, the N-machine, the Thesta-Di >statica, cold fusion and its variants, hydrinos, and zero-point energy could >hardly ask for a better intercessor than Tutt. His vivid, level-headed and >engrossing commentary is as entertaining as it is thought-provoking. > >Liberalisation and technical innovation are already raising fundamental >questions about the future of electricity. If the search that Tutt >chronicles should happen to bear fruit, the future will be stranger still. > >(Read Gene Mallove's review in the new issue of Infinite Energy magazine on >newsstands now.) > >Publicity: > >Nemah Kamar >Simon & Schuster UK Ltd >Africa House >64 - 78 Kingsway >London WC2B 6AH >United Kingdom >Tel: +44 (0)20 7316 1988 >Fax: +44 (0)20 7316 0332 > >To order the book: > >Send $39.50 US (includes S&H) to: >Lightpath Productions >PO BOX 19, >Bungay, >Suffolk, >NR35 2BX, >England UK >info thesearchforfreeenergy.com > >You can order directly online with British pounds: >£26.50 (includes S&H) at: >http://www.thesearchforfreeenergy.com/orderbody1.htm >WORLPAY accepts MasterCard, Visa, Delta, Eurocard, Solo and Switch. WORLDPAY >is the provider of choice for many of the world's leading organisations >including, Amnesty International, Princess Diana Memorial Fund, The >Economist, Oxfam, Mars, UPS etc > > > > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 12 19:06:04 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id TAA16765; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 19:05:48 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 19:05:48 -0700 Message-ID: <000301c0f3ae$9c236bc0$c49b09ca eximcon> From: "eximcon" To: Subject: How to disc-continue ? Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 07:25:53 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0032_01C0F3DA.14AA5060" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Resent-Message-ID: <"D5S-M.0.s54.yfi9x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43130 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0032_01C0F3DA.14AA5060 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I wish to go away for a few days, and wish to discontinue the Vortex mails for a few days, otherwise they will fill my mailbox and stop=20 important messages to be received. Will some=20 one guide me. . ------=_NextPart_000_0032_01C0F3DA.14AA5060 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I wish to go away for = a few days,=20 and wish to
discontinue the = Vortex mails for a=20 few days,
otherwise they will = fill my mailbox=20 and stop
important = messages to be received. Will = some=20
one guide = me.
.
 
------=_NextPart_000_0032_01C0F3DA.14AA5060-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 12 19:12:52 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id TAA20108; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 19:11:33 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 19:11:33 -0700 Reply-To: From: "Keith Nagel" To: Subject: RE: Mercury Arc Space Drive? Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 22:17:33 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <038201c0f337$280f0e00$e2b4bfa8 computer> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Importance: Normal Resent-Message-ID: <"Pp_0i3.0.6w4.Lli9x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43131 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Hi Fred. I could probably swing 1000A pretty easy and up to 10000A if things look promising? I don't have the batteries, add to the shopping list. Better might be an electrolytic cap, probably get an impulse in the millisecond region with what's around. 6% change in weight? I'll need a balance along with the pan scale, it can only do about 1000g. I expect forces due to action between the current carrying members will be substantial! Hmmm.... It's also fitted for water cooling, allowing for extra rocket-engine-like appearance (smile). K. -----Original Message----- From: Frederick Sparber [mailto:fjsparber earthlink.net] Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 7:59 AM To: vortex-l eskimo.com Cc: jlsparber earthlink.net Subject: Re: Mercury Arc Space Drive? Hi Keith. While Mitchell Jones is busy slinging mud in a boxcar, could you see your way clear to set your ignitron on a digital scale and fire it using one or two 12 volt storage batteries? The 10 to 20 volt drop across the ignitron should allow at least 300 amperes for a few minutes or so before you have to cool it. At 300 amperes you Might get about 180 grams of weight increase, or you might not get any, in which case you can use it as a hot water heater. :-) From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 12 21:31:12 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id VAA16694; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 21:28:41 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 21:28:41 -0700 Message-ID: <01C0F386.F2D05280.dequickert ucdavis.edu> From: Dan Quickert To: "'vortex-l eskimo.com'" Subject: RE: How to disc-continue ? Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 21:30:39 -0700 X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet E-mail/MAPI - 8.0.0.4211 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"Hk4T2.0.g44.ulk9x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43132 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: RTFM !! http://www.eskimo.com/~billb/weird/wvort.html near bottom of page: "To unsubscribe, send a *blank* message to: vortex-L-request eskimo.com Put the single word "unsubscribe" in the subject line of the header. No quotes around "unsubscribe," of course. On Tuesday, June 12, 2001 6:56 PM, eximcon wrote: > I wish to go away for a few days, and wish to > discontinue the Vortex mails for a few days, > otherwise they will fill my mailbox and stop > important messages to be received. Will some > one guide me. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 12 22:24:11 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id WAA03879; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 22:23:24 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 22:23:24 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Sender: mjones pop.jump.net Message-Id: Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 00:20:27 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Mitchell Jones Subject: What happened to Horace Heffner? Resent-Message-ID: <"lsm-i2.0.Ny.BZl9x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43134 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Is Horace just busy doing other things, or is he ill? I haven't seen a post from him for a very long time. --MJ ________________ Quote of the month: "Always strive to be accurate, even when it doesn't matter, so that you can be accurate when it does matter." --Jude Acers From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 12 22:24:26 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id WAA03812; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 22:23:18 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 22:23:18 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Sender: mjones pop.jump.net Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 00:18:53 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Mitchell Jones Subject: Re: reactionless drives? Resent-Message-ID: <"GAij23.0.Ox.6Zl9x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43133 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Thomas Malloy wrote: >I just finished reading through your post on the etherons Mitchell. >It's an interesting theory, however I can't see how I'm going to be >able to get along without the right hand and left hand rule. ***{The best way to understand my model is to go through the description line by line and state your questions and arguments. I will happily respond, and when the process is done, I am confident you will no longer need to rely on "rules of thumb" to gauge the direction of magnetic forces. (One of the many tragedies of "modern" physics is that its victims have no visual model of what magnetism is, and, as a result, are reduced to the rote memorization of equations and of "rules of thumb." It is a sorry state to be in, and one that it is worthwhile to escape from, even if considerable mental effort is required.) --MJ}*** I'm >going to forward your post to Pat Bailey and see what he thinks about >this. > >Your theory reminds me of John E W Keeley's theories. have you seen >his drawings explaining his theories about particles that are smaller >than electrons? See www.svpvril.com. ***{I hadn't seen them until just now. That's some mighty strange stuff, Kemosabe! :-) Anyway, for the record: all of my theories treat entities/particles as fundamental, not waves. I consider waves to be a manifestation of the aggregate behavior of particles. --MJ}*** >I can't help thinking that if Cook is right, and I have reason to >believe that he is, then the drive has to be reacting against >something. IMHO, that something has to be the Aether. ***{I know nothing about "Cook's drive," but I fully expect that, in the future, propellers will be designed that push against the aether, thereby making it possible to travel literally anywhere. --MJ}*** Also IMHO, we >have to get to the bottom of this. If Cook is right, we need a new >paradigm of physics. Once we have that we can move forward, not until. ________________ Quote of the month: "Always strive to be accurate, even when it doesn't matter, so that you can be accurate when it does matter." --Jude Acers From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 12 22:48:22 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id WAA11162; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 22:47:25 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 22:47:25 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Sender: mjones pop.jump.net Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <028f01c0f2b0$00396060$e2b4bfa8 computer> References: Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 00:30:33 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Mitchell Jones Subject: Re: Mercury Arc Space Drive? Resent-Message-ID: <"tE9jt.0.Kk2.jvl9x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43135 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Mitchell Jones" >To: >Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 2:38 PM >Subject: Re: Mercury Arc Space Drive? > > >Mud slinging don't hack it, Mitchell. Do the experiment. :-) > >Regards, Frederick ***{I would be happy to try it, Fred, if I could see a difference between doing so and trying to lift myself by pulling on my own bootstraps. If you think there is a difference, I would appreciate it if you would explain what the difference is. Seriously. --MJ}*** ________________ Quote of the month: "Always strive to be accurate, even when it doesn't matter, so that you can be accurate when it does matter." --Jude Acers From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 12 23:13:26 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id XAA19247; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 23:13:06 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 23:13:06 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <001f01c0f2b0$4e86d900$e8181ad8 oemcomputer> References: <001f01c0f2b0$4e86d900$e8181ad8 oemcomputer> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 01:12:30 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: thomas malloy Subject: Re: Candidate for universal gravitational glue Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Resent-Message-ID: <"lRa5H.0.ei4.mHm9x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43136 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Re: Candidate for universal gravitational glue
it is a wave

Gravity is a force not a particle.

Hum, I'm not qualified to comment, but the Japanese seem to view it as a particle. As I understand it, the phenomena can be viewed as either a wave of a particle.

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 12 23:13:59 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id XAA19455; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 23:13:28 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 23:13:28 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <5.0.2.1.2.20010612144542.0294b8a8 pop.mindspring.com> References: <5.0.2.1.2.20010612144542.0294b8a8 pop.mindspring.com> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 01:12:30 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: thomas malloy Subject: Re: Article about energy and food Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Resent-Message-ID: <"S10_-1.0.pl4.6Im9x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43137 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: >ourselves, how far have we progressed from the hunter/gatherer stage? I read someplace that agriculture consumes more fossil fuel energy than it produces. If this is true, so much for biomass coversion. >water of people downriver. (Let's not kid ourselves about what we drink.) Da! > >Household composting of food garbage in urban areas is not >practical, or safe. My wife did it for many years, but she was >forced to stop by an infestation of mice after the cat died. That's why G-d created kittens! >. Opossums have very small brains compared to placental mammals, but >not only do they eat vegetables, they somehow managed to eat our >pond fish and kill six chickens. It might have been a raccoon, but I >blame the 'possums. > >- Jed Get a dog! A big terrier comes to mind, English Sheep Dog or that other dog breed that was breed to fight big cats. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 12 23:14:18 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id XAA19514; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 23:13:39 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 23:13:39 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <000201c0f380$d4cc5be0$d38f85ce computer> References: <000201c0f380$d4cc5be0$d38f85ce computer> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 01:12:30 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: thomas malloy Subject: Re: Lest we forget, membership drive Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Resent-Message-ID: <"ULDiQ1.0.Nm4.BIm9x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43138 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: >We need more members! With the "New Blood" on >vortex-l it's time for a membership drive. I tell everyone with an interest in fringe science about this list From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Jun 13 05:17:39 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id FAA13172; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 05:17:03 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 05:17:03 -0700 Message-ID: <00c901c0f3fa$01350780$d38f85ce computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: Subject: Re; It's a Gas Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 06:14:11 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0005_01C0F3D0.0FDC0B00" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Resent-Message-ID: <"ZdIRf3.0.XD3.zcr9x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43139 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C0F3D0.0FDC0B00 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit http://www.cnn.com/2001/TECH/science/06/12/wyoming.gas/index.html ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C0F3D0.0FDC0B00 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="CNN.com - 'Horse whisperer' speaks up against gas drilling - June 12, 2001.url" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="CNN.com - 'Horse whisperer' speaks up against gas drilling - June 12, 2001.url" [DEFAULT] BASEURL=http://www.cnn.com/2001/TECH/science/06/12/wyoming.gas/index.html [DOC#36] BASEURL=http://toolbar.netscape.com/tw_hat/iframe/cnn.html ORIGURL=http://toolbar.netscape.com/tw_hat/iframe/cnn.html [InternetShortcut] URL=http://www.cnn.com/2001/TECH/science/06/12/wyoming.gas/index.html Modified=60CA5AD4F9F3C00105 ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C0F3D0.0FDC0B00-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Jun 13 05:58:05 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id FAA28683; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 05:57:27 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 05:57:27 -0700 Message-ID: <3B276334.453DD693 bellsouth.net> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 08:57:24 -0400 From: Terry Blanton X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: New Energy Funding References: <004f01c0f391$ace3ed80$2a191ad8 oemcomputer> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"KNJHC1.0.407.sCs9x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43140 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: If they will demonstrate their technology is viable, Earthtech can get them all the funds they need. Possibly you should contact Dr. Puthoff directly. Regards, Terry Bruce Meland wrote: > > I am extremely busy trying to get our publication and any info I am allowed > to publish about neutrinovoltaics will be published in our next issue. The > 2 neutrinovoltaics inventors have independently come up with similar > technology. One is presently living in a Pacific Island and the other in the > midwest. I cannot divulge their technology even if i was given almost all > the details. One inventor got a lot of information from long lost Tesla > Notes and the other figured it out by searching works by Hendershot, Keely > and Tesla. They are seeking rather large amounts of funding and are willing > to demonstrate the technology to the right partys. Some of the name calling > on this list is counterproductive and is indicitative of low level > technicians. A truce on this kind of activity would be in the best interest > of all concerned. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Jun 13 06:23:39 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id GAA02500; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 06:23:01 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 06:23:01 -0700 Message-ID: <3B276917.26B9782C powerup.com.au> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 23:22:31 +1000 From: David Hancock X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex Subject: Quantum entanglement Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"TzMcE1.0.-c.qas9x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43141 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Two gas samples, each 10^12 cesium atoms, experimentally maintaining an entangled spin state for 0.5ms. Is there something about Cs - the most reactive metal, the most alkaline element - that makes this work? http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/quant-ph/0106057 David From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Jun 13 07:31:36 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id HAA27692; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 07:31:08 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 07:31:08 -0700 Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20010613102043.00a92330 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 10:31:05 -0400 To: vortex-l eskimo.com, vortex-l@eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: Re: Article about energy and food In-Reply-To: References: <5.0.2.1.2.20010612144542.0294b8a8 pop.mindspring.com> <5.0.2.1.2.20010612144542.0294b8a8 pop.mindspring.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <"XvhrQ1.0.Zm6.iat9x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43142 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: thomas malloy wrote: >I read someplace that agriculture consumes more fossil fuel energy than it >produces. If this is true, so much for biomass coversion. Biomass from agricultural byproducts makes a great deal of economic sense. For example, burning or gasifying peanut shells in Georgia or the waste from olive oil presses in Spain. Growing plants only for fuel makes less sense, although some crops can be grown without fertilizer or weeding. Harvesting wild plants for fuel is an outrage, except in places like Australia or parts of North America which must undergo periodic intense wildfires to maintain a healthy ecology. Converting edible U.S. corn to fuel is the stupidest, most inhuman energy producing scheme I have ever heard of. It means we starve people to death in other parts of the world and destroying our the ecology in order to produce gasoline which is much more expensive than fossil fuel. - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Jun 13 07:57:27 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id HAA04366; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 07:56:33 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 07:56:33 -0700 Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20010613103520.0293e0a8 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 10:56:21 -0400 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: Re: New Energy Funding In-Reply-To: <3B276334.453DD693 bellsouth.net> References: <004f01c0f391$ace3ed80$2a191ad8 oemcomputer> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <"AJqwY.0.541.Vyt9x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43143 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Bruce Meland wrote: > the details. One inventor got a lot of information from long lost Tesla > Notes and the other figured it out by searching works by Hendershot, Keely > and Tesla. They are seeking rather large amounts of funding and are willing > to demonstrate the technology to the right partys. If they will demonstrate and sell prototypes to me, I will bring them millions immediately, and billions in a few years. They would not even to sell me shares of the company; just license me to sell the machines. I am 100% serious about this. If a prototype machine can be fabricated for less than $10,000, so-called "deep pockets" are not called for, and in fact people with lots of money, power and influence would be more trouble than they are worth. Most major discoveries have succeeded without established financial backing. In fact, most required no outside investment capital until they matured into billion dollar industries. One of the perverse ideas popularized during the dot-com boom was that new ventures require hundreds of millions of dollars. A dot-com venture or the device described by Meland are both easily scaled from a handful of employees in a garage to thousands of employees. This kind of venture would not require more than $100,000 to launch. If the machine is real, I can and will launch it myself in a few weeks. > Some of the name calling > on this list is counterproductive and is indicitative of low level > technicians. Nonsense. No one is "calling names." We are demanding substance instead of hot air. A truce on this kind of activity would be in the best interest > of all concerned What does that mean? Mr. Meland want to publish imaginary claims without a shred of evidence, and he does not want anyone else to demand proof, or rigor, or even the names of the inventors! Whenever he is challenged to provide the smallest detail, he refuses. We are not allowed warn people that such claims typically published by scam artists trolling for victims. What Meland is doing is unethical, unscientific and contrary to the spirit and purpose of this mailing list. It would be in the best interests of everyone here if he would put up or shut up. If he is allowed to publish this kind of garbage indefinitely, he will degrade this mailing list until it is no better than the Keelynet. Already, several scientists have told me privately they are signing off. - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Jun 13 08:18:09 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id IAA11407; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 08:17:14 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 08:17:14 -0700 X-Sent: 13 Jun 2001 15:16:40 GMT From: "Peter Fred" To: "Vortex-L" Subject: If no dark matter, then no General Relativity. Then what? Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 11:13:04 -0400 Message-ID: <000101c0f41b$57d5d620$4de01f26 default> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0 Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Resent-Message-ID: <"95ajT1.0.2o2.wFu9x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43144 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Etherman in the sci.skeptic newsgroup wrote: "The strange dark matter hypothesis requires contradictory and unrealistic properties. It actually makes very little sense. The evidence FOR strange dark matter is that Einstein's theory is falsified without it. IMO, we need a better theory of gravity." ***Recently the Cold Dark Matter hypothesis, which the DM detectors are looking for, has been in disfavor and now the Warm Dark Matter hypothesis has taken its place. However the Warm DarK Matter idea is now in trouble. See http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/astro-ph?0106108. How many more crazy ideas are going to be believed in order to save the time-honored mass-based gravitational ideas of Newton and Einstein? In this connection, I would like to know what is it wrong with my heat-based gravity theory as being able to fill the void that would occur if General Relativity is no longer believed in? This theory, among other things, is able to relate the ubiquitous, easy-to-detect, starlight to the gravitational force which curiously also varies inversely as the square of the distance from a star. It is also able to use the well-established fact that as a star ages its luminosity increases in order to account for the recent, surprising finding that the universe is accelerating. Moreover, this theory provides a prescription on how to produce gravity in the laboratory which has been verified even with my meager experimental resources. The title to the paper on this theory is "Gravitation as resistance to the radial conduction of heat" and it can be found at: http://pbfred.tripod.com/thermal.pdf or http://pbfred.tripod.com/ Regards, Peter B. Fred From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Jun 13 11:23:17 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id LAA28911; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 11:22:02 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 11:22:02 -0700 Message-ID: <3B27A268.B86009AD bellsouth.net> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 13:27:04 -0400 From: Terry Blanton X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: OU in Tennessee? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"uwxVR3.0.z17.yyw9x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43148 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Does anyone know more about this? http://newschannel5.com/news/0106/12/invent.html TIA, Terry From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Jun 13 12:14:29 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id LAA16428; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 11:05:38 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 11:05:38 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 12:27:06 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: thomas malloy Subject: time distortion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Resent-Message-ID: <"OWbTX3.0.U04.Yjw9x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43145 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: I'm disappointed that no one responded to my post on the time distortion machine. Come on people, this is time he's bending, not iron bars! From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Jun 13 12:16:55 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id LAA16442; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 11:05:38 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 11:05:38 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <5.0.2.1.2.20010613102043.00a92330 pop.mindspring.com> References: <5.0.2.1.2.20010612144542.0294b8a8 pop.mindspring.com> <5.0.2.1.2.20010612144542.0294b8a8 pop.mindspring.com> <5.0.2.1.2.20010613102043.00a92330 pop.mindspring.com> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 12:27:06 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: thomas malloy Subject: Re: Article about energy and food Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Resent-Message-ID: <"jXgPp1.0.Y04.Yjw9x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43146 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: > Converting edible U.S. corn to fuel is the stupidest, most inhuman >energy producing scheme I have ever heard of. It means we starve >people to death in other parts of the world and destroying our the >ecology in order to produce gasoline which is much more expensive >than fossil fuel. >- Jed I used to feel this way, back when i was building hog barns. What i wad being paid to do was convert corn into hog manure and a small amount of meat, However i have subsequently realized that your above reaction depends on how you look at it Jed. The farmers are going broke because the poor people can't afford to buy their corn, so we might as well use it to make fuel From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Jun 13 12:18:33 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id LAA16476; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 11:05:38 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 11:05:38 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 12:27:06 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: thomas malloy Subject: Re: reactionless drives? Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Resent-Message-ID: <"L60TF3.0.M14.njw9x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43147 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: > >***{The best way to understand my model is to go through the description >line by line and state your questions and arguments. I will happily OK. I've been visualizing the etherons ( ping pong balls ) going with the stream. which is going down a pipe. The fluid molocules near the edge of the pipe move slowly, the speed of movement increases as the fluid moves toward the center. I can visulaize the balls near the edge rotating slowly counter clockwise. The access of their rotation would be perpendicular to the direction of flow. I don't see the balls in the center of the pipe rotating clockwise however. In your previous posts you said that the Aether flows downward into the poles and then is dispersed outward at the equator. Is this all of the aetherons? If I wanted to capture them would I have to set up a detector at the poles or on the equator? As I'm sure you have picked up from my previous posts, my agenda is cohereing the aether and putting it to work. Puthoff believes that there is enough energy in a vacuum chamber the size of a coffee cup to vaporize all the oceans. Then there is my friend Daryl who believes that the energy is at best detectable. Where do you fall in this spectrum? > > >Your theory reminds me of John E W Keeley's theories. have you seen > >***{I hadn't seen them until just now. That's some mighty strange stuff, >Kemosabe! :-) I don't know if Dale has posted Keeley's pictures of his visions of the atomic particles and subatomic and subsubatomic particles. If your interested, I'll check them out. If there not available, I can scan them in and email them to you > Anyway, for the record: all of my theories treat >entities/particles as fundamental, not waves. I consider waves to be a >manifestation of the aggregate behavior of particles. --MJ}*** I agree > > >***{I know nothing about "Cook's drive," go to www.forceborne.com for details on Cook's drive. >but I fully expect that, in the >future, propellers will be designed that push against the aether, thereby >making it possible to travel literally anywhere. --MJ}*** Keeley also believed that. The story I heard is that he build a flying machine that levitated based on them. This is exciting because there's good money to be had hauling things into stable earth orbit. The best rate I've heard of is a Russian Energia which costs $500 per pound, can you imagine the explosion in volume that would result if I could lower the price to say $25 per pound? I assume that you are interested in thinking about such a propeller, I will email Dale and see if I can get a description of it. It worked by combining certain vibrations. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Jun 13 12:43:35 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id MAA07168; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 12:36:56 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 12:36:56 -0700 Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20010613152318.00a92330 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 15:36:45 -0400 To: vortex-l eskimo.com, vortex-l@eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: Re: Article about energy and food In-Reply-To: References: <5.0.2.1.2.20010613102043.00a92330 pop.mindspring.com> <5.0.2.1.2.20010612144542.0294b8a8 pop.mindspring.com> <5.0.2.1.2.20010612144542.0294b8a8 pop.mindspring.com> <5.0.2.1.2.20010613102043.00a92330 pop.mindspring.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <"81xoS1.0.vl1.N3y9x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43149 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: thomas malloy wrote: >> Converting edible U.S. corn to fuel is the stupidest, most inhuman >> energy producing scheme I have ever heard of. . . . > >I used to feel this way, back when i was building hog barns. What i wad >being paid to do was convert corn into hog manure and a small amount of >meat . . . What they should do is convert the hog manure into energy. That would give us the benefits of both meat and ethanol. The meat is, at least, highly concentrated energy compared to the corn. >, However i have subsequently realized that your above reaction depends on >how you look at it Jed. The farmers are going broke because the poor >people can't afford to buy their corn, so we might as well use it to make fuel That is an economic or social failure rather than a technical problem. There is no technical reason why anyone, anywhere on earth, should go hungry, or go without clean water, fuel, or vaccinations for common diseases. It would cost practically nothing to fix these problems, since the people who need the food would themselves would do most of the work and pay most of the expense of providing it. It would not increase pollution or strain on the ecosystem. Actually, it would help the ecosystem, because people would not scrounge for food or cut trees for fuel. It is astonishing to me that in the 21st century dire poverty still exists. This is a black mark against all systems: communism and capitalism, tyranny and democracy. None of them works right! We have not yet invented an economic system that fulfills the most basic requirement of civilization, going back to the stone age: feeding people. You would think that a species which can build the Internet or parse its own DNA could do better. - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Jun 13 13:22:43 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id NAA02161; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 13:21:16 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 13:21:16 -0700 Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 13:19:11 -0700 From: Jones Beene Subject: Hubbard transformer To: vortex-l eskimo.com Message-id: <0GEV003H0XTWK4 mta5.snfc21.pbi.net> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Opera 5.11 build 904 Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Resent-Message-ID: <"G1W-T1.0.bX.wiy9x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43150 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Greetings & please excuse if this is a resend as my ISP was acting up this AM, Recently, Keith Nagel made mention of an article he found on a weird and wonderful website - which reviews a sad era in our nation's history (the CIA's efforts at mind control in the 50s-60s). The book which is referenced is called "Acid Dreams" by Lee and Shlain and it sounded so interesting that I ordered a copy from Amazon before seeing it hours later on the "new" shelf at the local library (this has happened before). It's intriguing enough, despite an Oliver Stone-like approach to journalism, that I finished it last night, but the real point of this post is that it contains a chapter on Alfred M. Hubbard, the inventor of one of the few pre-WWII "free energy" devices which was fairly well documented (but also which has been widely reconstructed without Hubbard's success). This pre WWII era is promising because they tested things back then, not with meters, but by actually going out and powering large vehicles. It is that device, usually called the Hubbard transformer, that I hope will generate some comment and study - as it may point the way towards an overlooked type of energy conversion - a method of direct conversion of high energy gamma photons into electricity. With very little modification, this technique could perhaps be quickly implemented as an "add-on" to nearly every nuclear plant in operation in the country. BTW, the book does not tell us anything new about this device - it is mentioned only because Capt. Hubbard (if indeed the authors have not confused two individuals with the same name) went on to even greater, eh...let us say, notoriety. The Hubbard device, according to the most astute accounts, consisted of a large central iron primary wound with a lot of magnet wire, the main surprise being that the core was basically a hollow iron pipe with a radioactive fill (pilfered radium). The primary is surrounded by seven iron core secondaries and both are circuited with big caps. A small lead acid battery is switched through an auto distributor to give a resonant LC frequency that is probably in the low khz range. There is a large gain in output from the battery to the load and the battery reportedly doesn't discharge (remind you of anything?). Some time ago, this kind of transformer (without the "fill"), spawned a number of unsuccessful attempts at free energy, as reported on this forum, through what is known as "parametrics." Parametrics can be described as an electrical strategy focusing on resonant alteration - not of the drive current properties - but instead on the reluctance of the cores. It is somewhat surprising that this technique works almost as well as traditional induction in transformers, but also it should not be surprising that many of the proponents of the devices (the UDT, the McKie LC circuit, Sweet triode, or the Coler device) came along before there was widespread use of dedicated power analyzers. It is now just a footnote to this kind of research that even the most expensive digital Tek O'scopes cannot take an accurate power reading in the audible frequency ranges 1-10 khz. Anyway, I know of two recent attempts to recreate the Hubbard transformer, one by Paul Brown which was patented (even though it looks like it was plagerized from AH) but never made it to prime time - probably because it requires rare and expensive isotopes. Another device that I know of used uranium ore and was reputed to be massively OU until it was tested with a Clarke Hess analyzer. The main thing that was overlooked about this last one was not that that it turned out less powerful then it first seemed - but that in testing, there was a direct correlation found in the amount of radioactive fill in the central core and the power output. I had never thought about it before reading the new account of Hubbard, but consider this. IF the Hubbard transformer did really work (and there is good evidence that it was indeed very efficient) and IF the reason that it worked (and the reason that the Brown device works) is because the central core is able to act as a photon switch (i.e. to allow phased pulsation of the gamma rays out of the primary core in order to modify the reluctance/ inductance properties of the secondary cores) then why couldn't the same technique be applied to harness the unused radiation from ANY nuclear reactor or high level waste container (where the gammas are normally wasted)? Of course we wouldn't actually wind our primary around a reactor, per se, but instead we could engineer basically the same operational technique but with numerous smaller external transformers- more like photon switches than transformers. Gammas that are normally diffused in atomic plants can constitute a fair percentage of the total energy output - and photon switches themselves are not at all a pipe dream, but a reality in many cutting edge applications. Furthermore, instead of "mothballing" old reactors, or cutting them into pieces and burying them out in the Nevada badlands, why not convert them into big Hubbard transformers? If you optimized the residual gamma release and got optimum efficiency from your transformer, then perhaps you could convert a decommissioned 100 megawatt reactor into an "eternal" 20 megawatt unit! Not to mention all those 55 gallon drums of high level waste - talk about a "ready- roll" for a primarly core! Comments? Jones Beene From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Jun 13 13:56:15 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id NAA21966; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 13:55:07 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 13:55:07 -0700 Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 13:47:35 -0700 From: Jones Beene Subject: Re: OU in Tennessee? To: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-to: jonesb9 pacbell.net Message-id: <0GEV00ACMZ58YD mta5.snfc21.pbi.net> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Opera 5.11 build 904 Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Resent-Message-ID: <"_9ooN.0.7N5.gCz9x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43151 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Terry Blanton wrote: >Does anyone know more about this? http://newschannel5.com/news/0106/12/invent.html I emailed Nick Beres, the journalist who did the story, for more info when I saw it this morning. No reply yet. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Jun 13 15:04:30 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id PAA20585; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 15:03:40 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 15:03:40 -0700 From: Robin van Spaandonk To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: If no dark matter, then no General Relativity. Then what? Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 08:03:00 +1000 Organization: Improving Message-ID: References: <000101c0f41b$57d5d620$4de01f26 default> In-Reply-To: <000101c0f41b$57d5d620$4de01f26 default> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id PAA20524 Resent-Message-ID: <"758WT.0.J15.wC-9x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43152 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: In reply to Peter Fred's message of Wed, 13 Jun 2001 11:13:04 -0400: [snip] >In this connection, I would like to know what is it wrong with my >heat-based gravity theory as being able to fill the void that would >occur if General Relativity is no longer believed in? [snip] What's wrong with it is that the weight of an abject is pretty much independent of temperature, yet directly proportional to the amount of mass present. If heat has some influence, then this is only a secondary effect, obviously not the main cause. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Jun 13 16:49:00 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id QAA31066; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 16:47:46 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 16:47:46 -0700 Message-ID: <000301c0f481$0d65ae60$2f0e84ac default> From: "Thomas D. Clark" To: "vortex" , Cc: "Thomas D. Clark" Subject: Re: New Age Town Designs, Free Energy, Force Fields, - My respnse to your questions Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 20:21:00 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3612.1700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3612.1700 X-Apparently-From: ConexTom aol.com Resent-Message-ID: <"lBKuk3.0.Jb7.Yk_9x" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43153 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: In response to your questions on my email on new age towns, free energies, and force fields: "Would you please elaborate? That is, would you care to proffer what you have on hand in terms of free energy and 'privacy force fields' and what you mean by "self sustaining and clean environmentally friendly technologies."? How close are you? Would you care to describe the scope of your work and why you feel you're on the brink of a breakthrough? " I have a web page which specifies some of my rough concepts for a new age town at www.rhfweb.com\newage.html. I have listed at my web site at www.rhfweb.com some information on plasma force fields, and the patents for them filed. I also have listed information on my ideas of force fields in general terms at the web page. Please check the link 5. Current Research Areas and the link 11. Articles on how to block out radiation from directed energy devices, electronic harassment, and nonconsensual radiation experimentation. with a sublink portable force fields at the www.rhfweb.com site. The basic idea for force fields comes from : Cold Plasma Force Fields see Force Fields. Also please see U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,414,324, 5,387,842, and 5,456,972 at http://www.uspto.gov/patft/index.html, which show how to use radio-frequency waves to energize a gas such as air to create a plasma, which could be used as a force field to absorb or deflect directed energies and radiation's. I am presently working on how to develop free energy devices to tap into cosmic photon energy or gravity waves to create energy for force fields. Also I have a great deal of information on how to create force fields by using pyramids and sacred geometry's. I have a page at web site www.rhfweb.com under the link 11. entitled Pyramid Power=16 Levels of the Mind=16 PhysicalDimensions=12 Zodiac Houses which describes how pyramids and the human mind can create force fields. I am working on how mangetic-electric/subatomic quarks/neutrons/neutrinos make gravity waves and how objects make anti-gravity force fields. I am reading several books in high energy physics and free energy technologies which are listed near the end of the list at my web page www.rhfweb.com\rpgref.html. to better understand and develop the above notions of force fields and free energies. My credentials are at my web site at www.rhfweb.com under link 25. Credentials. Since I am only a amateur physicist or researcher, I intend to hire professional researchers with funds to develop, detail, and professionally establish force field technologies and free energy technologies. My primary talents lie in time management and futures predictions and planning. I am very good at reviewing ideas, plans, and setting up future agendas with near perfect syncronicities and probabilities of success. So I am merely researching the basic ideas and technologies needed to produce free energies and force fields so that I may hire others to detail it, while I synchronize the future agendas to allow the technologies to be developed safely, and successfully. "Which 'may' use new age technologies? What, precisely, do you mean by 'new age technologies', and why do you feel the need to use the qualifier, 'may'? " My web page www.rhfweb.com\newage.html lists some of my ideas on new age technologies. But in general new age technologies are technologies which have ethics and safety built into them to maintain a healthy, happy, clean, and non-violent environment for living beings. Technologies are designed to augment and maximize the happiness of living beings and societies and not replace, endanger, or enslave them. Technologies such as leadership technologies need to be developed whereby the leadership structures act in the best interest of living beings and not machines or logical corporations. I have a link at my new age web page an ideal form of executive leadership which involves 3 top executive leaders instead of one, and 3 parties instead of two, to eliminate all unhealthy dualistic power structures which do not represent nature very well and create excessive imbalances. The reason I used the word "may" is because my ideas of new age towns not only use high technologies associated with the new age of information but also may use older ideas to create a healthy blend between the new and the old. Older ideas of privacy and independence, decentralization of recourses and power, hand crafted and detailed personalized technologies are blended with newer ideas of high technologies such as free energy and force fields to ensure privacy and freedom. Also older ideas of manners and morals are blended with newer ideas of culture, socialization, entertainment, and media, to create a more healthy environment. "If the technologies are free, then what would be the point of filing international patents? Patents _resrict_ the free dissemination of technology, so your statement that you would "file international patents to allow free technology to be used in the town" is bogus." If I develop free energy technologies then if I do not file patents, other's may file patents similar to mine and then they may prevent others from using the technologies. Also if I file patents then the technologies may be commercialized so that they benefit the masses and not just the few. Also many of the force field technologies need to patented so that they meet legal requirements to be used safely. Otherwise they may be illegal in the countries to used in. I would also need to win court cases to allow the technologies to be used in other countries once the patents are filed. Free energy and force fields all have national security applications and may be restricted. Any information in a patent becomes public knowledge. I could also file the patent under my private charity foundation and then the patents become not only public knowledge and useable by anyone but also protected from others filing similar patents and blocking their use. For a patent filed by non-profit foundation or a public charity, all information is free for the benefit of the general public, so that any patent filed by the foundation or charity is for use for free by the general public. I may have problems finding researchers who would allow me to file a patent for my foundation based on their work without letting them make some profit off of it. So I may have to set up some minimal profit motives to entice researcher to work with me. Also if companies can make some profit off of the technologies then they may mass produce them for the general public. I do have some problems with surveillance technologies being used on me and my royal family and associates to prevent me from encouraging democracy and developing new age technologies. This is a very coming thing. Many politicians encouraging new age technologies have the same problems with surveillance technologies and remote viewing being used on them and their associates to prevent them from doing what is in the best interest of each individual citizen and not a particular group. My only unique abilities lie in being very ethical, honest, risk taking for others, and persistence. If per chance that such a pattern matches or resonates better with the universal ether, and my goals happen to catch on because other's like them, and others hear about their potential success, and then decide to repress me and my associates because of it, then such circumstance are not a trap but a very natural phenomena of repression by the powerful or the masses on the rights of the individual or the minority. I am only trying to encourage a model for a new age community. Other's may copy it or ignore it. It is up to them what to do. If you block my attempts to communicate new age ideas then you may prevent others from being able to decide what is best for them. I have only noticed a pattern whereby people are repressed by dualistic power structures to prevent the success of the individual from realizing n-ary alternative social structures and technologies. Nature models tri-nary or n-ary structures which do not work well under dualism. So I am encouraging new age ideas and technologies which protect the individual rights over the masses or the dualistic power structures and historical images which support only a few groups of minorities. Any false propaganda or double speak generated by dualistic power structures to misrepresent my goals and the goals of other ordinary citizens, does not reflect my personal goals or futures Respectively, President, Thomas Clark Radiation Health Foundation (RHF) Inc., RHF Buisness web site at: http://www.rhfweb.com/ Personal website at http://www.rhfweb.com/personal New Age Media Productions at http://www.rhfweb.com/newage Email: tom rhfweb.com From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Jun 13 17:24:03 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id RAA09882; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 17:23:10 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 17:23:10 -0700 From: dtmiller midiowa.net (Dean T. Miller) To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Article about energy and food Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 00:22:30 GMT Organization: Miller and Associates Message-ID: <3b280227.11032002 mail.midiowa.net> References: <5.0.2.1.2.20010612144542.0294b8a8 pop.mindspring.com> <5.0.2.1.2.20010612144542.0294b8a8@pop.mindspring.com> <5.0.2.1.2.20010613102043.00a92330@pop.mindspring.com> In-Reply-To: <5.0.2.1.2.20010613102043.00a92330 pop.mindspring.com> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.5/32.452 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id RAA09852 Resent-Message-ID: <"6y1mJ.0.FQ2.kF0Ax" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43154 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Hi Jed, On Wed, 13 Jun 2001 10:31:05 -0400, Jed Rothwell wrote: >Converting edible U.S. corn to >fuel is the stupidest, most inhuman energy producing scheme I have ever >heard of. It means we starve people to death in other parts of the world >and destroying our the ecology in order to produce gasoline which is much >more expensive than fossil fuel. Now cut it out!! You know that if people are starving in the world (and they are), it's due to their governments and not the inadequacy of food supplies. Transportation is somewhat a problem, but only somewhat. For decades farmers have been donating (or trying to donate) grains and other produce to various agencies and countries -- and have been turned down. Please don't perpetuate the myth that using crops, that are rotting in the bins, for fuel is somehow depriving starving people of food. -- Dean -- from (almost) Des Moines -- KB0ZDF From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Jun 13 18:16:14 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id SAA03887; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 18:15:37 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 18:15:37 -0700 Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 08:28:40 -0700 From: Jones Beene Subject: Hubbard transformer To: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-to: jonesb9 pacbell.net Message-id: <0GEV00ASZKDO2C mta7.pltn13.pbi.net> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Opera 5.11 build 904 Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Resent-Message-ID: <"upESR1.0.Uy.u01Ax" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43155 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Greetings, Recently, Keith Nagel made mention of an article he found on a verrry weird and wonderful website - which reviews a sad era in our nation's history (the CIA's efforts at mind control in the 50s-60s). The book which is referenced is called "Acid Dreams" by Lee and Shlain and it sounded so interesting that I ordered a copy from Amazon before seeing it hours later on the "new" shelf at the local library (this has happened before). It's intriguing enough, despite an Oliver Stone-like approach to journalism, that I finished it last night, but the real point of this post is that it contains a chapter on Alfred M. Hubbard, the inventor of one of the few pre-WWII "free energy" devices which was fairly well documented (but also which has been widely reconstructed without Hubbard's success). This pre WWII era is promising because they tested things back then, not with meters, but by actually going out and powering large vehicles. It is that device, usually called the Hubbard transformer, that I hope will generate some comment and study - as it may point the way towards an overlooked type of energy conversion - a method of direct conversion of high energy gamma photons into electricity. With very little modification, this technique could perhaps be quickly implemented as an "add-on" to nearly every nuclear plant in operation in the country. BTW, the book does not tell us anything new about this device - it is mentioned only because Capt. Hubbard (if indeed the authors have not confused two individuals with the same name) went on to even greater, eh...let us say, notoriety. The Hubbard device, according to the most astute accounts, consisted of a large central iron primary wound with a lot of magnet wire, the main surprise being that the core was basically a hollow iron pipe with a radioactive fill (pilfered radium). The primary is surrounded by seven iron core secondaries and both are circuited with big caps. A small lead acid battery is switched through an auto distributor to give a resonant LC frequency that is probably in the low khz range. There is a large gain in output from the battery to the load and the battery reportedly doesn't discharge (remind you of anything?). Some time ago, this kind of transformer (without the "fill"), spawned a number of unsuccessful attempts at free energy, as reported on this forum, through what is known as "parametrics." Parametrics can be described as an electrical strategy focusing on resonant alteration - not of the drive current properties - but instead on the reluctance of the cores. It is somewhat surprising that this technique works almost as well as traditional induction in transformers, but also it should not be surprising that many of the proponents of the devices (the UDT, the McKie LC circuit, Sweet triode, or the Coler device) came along before there was widespread use of dedicated power analyzers. It is now just a footnote to this kind of research that even the most expensive digital Tek O'scopes cannot take an accurate power reading in the audible frequency ranges 1-10 khz. Anyway, I know of two recent attempts to recreate the Hubbard transformer, one by Paul Brown which was patented (even though it looks like it was plagerized from AH) but never made it to prime time - probably because it requires rare and expensive isotopes. Another device that I know of used uranium ore and was reputed to be massively OU until it was tested with a Clarke Hess analyzer. The main thing that was overlooked about this last one was not that that it turned out less powerful then it first seemed - but that in testing, there was a direct correlation found in the amount of radioactive fill in the central core and the power output. I had never thought about it before reading the new account of Hubbard, but consider this. IF the Hubbard transformer did really work (and there is good evidence that it was indeed very efficient) and IF the reason that it worked (and the reason that the Brown device works) is because the central core is able to act as a photon switch (i.e. to allow phased pulsation of the gamma rays out of the primary core in order to modify the reluctance/ inductance properties of the secondary cores) then why couldn't the same technique be applied to harness the unused radiation from ANY nuclear reactor or high level waste container (where the gammas are normally wasted)? Of course we wouldn't actually wind our primary around a reactor, per se, but instead we could engineer basically the same operational technique but with numerous smaller external transformers- more like photon switches than transformers. Gammas that are normally diffused in atomic plants can constitute a fair percentage of the total energy output - and photon switches themselves are not at all a pipe dream, but a reality in many cutting edge applications. Furthermore, instead of "mothballing" old reactors, or cutting them into pieces and burying them out in the Nevada badlands, why not convert them into big Hubbard transformers? If you optimized the residual gamma release and got optimum efficiency from your transformer, then perhaps you could convert a decommissioned 100 megawatt reactor into an "eternal" 20 megawatt unit! Not to mention all those 55 gallon drums of high level waste - talk about a "ready- roll" for a primarly core! Comments? Jones Beene From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Jun 13 20:57:20 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id UAA07871; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 20:56:44 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 20:56:44 -0700 From: Robin van Spaandonk To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: If no dark matter, then no General Relativity. Then what? Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 13:56:09 +1000 Organization: Improving Message-ID: References: <000101c0f41b$57d5d620$4de01f26 default> In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id UAA07846 Resent-Message-ID: <"jOmoo2.0.tw1.xN3Ax" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43156 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: In reply to Robin van Spaandonk's message of Thu, 14 Jun 2001 08:03:00 +1000: [snip] >What's wrong with it is that the weight of an abject is pretty much ^^^^^^ object [snip] Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Jun 13 21:19:29 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id VAA15808; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 21:18:32 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 21:18:32 -0700 From: Robin van Spaandonk To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: time distortion Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 14:17:57 +1000 Organization: Improving Message-ID: <7negitol1ehv8coqjhonfgd2jqqaq4rlpj 4ax.com> References: In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id VAA15772 Resent-Message-ID: <"e5UNi1.0.qs3.Oi3Ax" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43157 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: In reply to thomas malloy's message of Wed, 13 Jun 2001 12:27:06 -0500: >I'm disappointed that no one responded to my post on the time >distortion machine. Come on people, this is time he's bending, not >iron bars! I've been waiting for more info. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Jun 13 22:43:17 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id WAA09703; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 22:42:48 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 22:42:48 -0700 From: Robin van Spaandonk To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Hubbard transformer Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 15:42:01 +1000 Organization: Improving Message-ID: <7jigits9mipgond5j9sdqj3lrssa995ngk 4ax.com> References: <0GEV00ASZKDO2C mta7.pltn13.pbi.net> In-Reply-To: <0GEV00ASZKDO2C mta7.pltn13.pbi.net> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id WAA09674 Resent-Message-ID: <"7oD4V3.0.UN2.Ox4Ax" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43158 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: In reply to Jones Beene's message of Wed, 13 Jun 2001 08:28:40 -0700: [snip] >Furthermore, instead of "mothballing" old reactors, or cutting them into pieces >and burying them out in the Nevada badlands, why not convert them into big >Hubbard transformers? If you optimized the residual gamma release and got >optimum efficiency from your transformer, then perhaps you could convert a >decommissioned 100 megawatt reactor into an "eternal" 20 megawatt unit! Not >to mention all those 55 gallon drums of high level waste - talk about a "ready- >roll" for a primarly core! [snip] About this time last year, I wrote to an American electric utility that uses nuclear power. The email I sent is copied here below. Unfortunately I no longer have their reply, but it was to the effect that they had every confidence in the effectiveness of current waste disposal plans in long term storage. I was disgusted with their reply. BTW I have also sent similar emails to Lloyds of London (because the insurance industry has a vested interest in the reduction of global warming), and received no reply at all, and also to the governor of California, during the Californian electricity crisis. Also no reply. Perhaps one of you will have more luck. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To: nucommunications nu.com Subject: A research question From: Robin van Spaandonk Date: Sun, 28 May 2000 17:01:03 +1000 Hi, It is an acknowledged fact that radwaste is basically a problem for the nuclear industry. Though you have procedures in place for temporary storage, and undubitably also have long term storage plans, wouldn't it be nice if you could get rid of it permanently, and generate excess power from that waste at the same time? There have been a number of patents over the years claiming to generate power from radioactive materials. One early claim was that of Alfred Hubbard, and his invention in a slightly altered form reappeared as US patent US4835433 ( http://www.patents.ibm.com/details?patent_number=4835433 ). Given that you are already in posession of the necessary materials and licenses, it would only cost you a few thousand dollars to find out just how effective such devices are or are not (they can be built quite small - just a few lbs.). Given the enormous potential upside, and minuscule downside, it seems to me that you may already have investigated such designs. If so, I would be curious as to what you found. Best Regards, Robin van Spaandonk --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Jun 14 00:30:13 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id AAA06257; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 00:29:47 -0700 Resent-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 00:29:47 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <7negitol1ehv8coqjhonfgd2jqqaq4rlpj 4ax.com> References: <7negitol1ehv8coqjhonfgd2jqqaq4rlpj 4ax.com> Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 02:28:32 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: thomas malloy Subject: Re: time distortion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Resent-Message-ID: <"BT7br.0.fX1.gV6Ax" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43160 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: >In reply to thomas malloy's message of Wed, 13 Jun 2001 12:27:06 -0500: > >>I'm disappointed that no one responded to my post on the time >>distortion machine. Come on people, this is time he's bending, not >>iron bars! >I've been waiting for more info. > > >Regards, > >Robin van Spaandonk Sorry, all the information I have on it was in my last post. I sent an email to the researcher, but so far, no reply. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Jun 14 00:30:20 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id AAA06312; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 00:29:51 -0700 Resent-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 00:29:51 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 02:28:32 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: thomas malloy Subject: Keeley's Aetheric propeller Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Resent-Message-ID: <"XpswO1.0.YY1.lV6Ax" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43161 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: As promised, here is a URL for a description of an acoustic levitation device http://www.dxshop.com/_shop/shop-indy.mhtml?shop=spectrum&cart=992502622-12348.db&tstamp=992502622&code=P0029488 From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Jun 14 00:32:16 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id AAA06238; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 00:29:46 -0700 Resent-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 00:29:46 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <0GEV003H0XTWK4 mta5.snfc21.pbi.net> References: <0GEV003H0XTWK4 mta5.snfc21.pbi.net> Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 02:28:32 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: thomas malloy Subject: Re: Hubbard transformer Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Resent-Message-ID: <"aTXCy2.0.MX1.fV6Ax" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43159 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: >ommissioned 100 megawatt reactor into an "eternal" 20 megawatt unit! Not >to mention all those 55 gallon drums of high level waste - talk >about a "ready- >roll" for a primarly core! > >Comments? > >Jones Beene I agree, I told Paul that, I offered to introduce him to our utility, NSP, now Excel Energy. Paul and I had a following out and he ignored my last email. But I think that your proposal is brilliant. Paul's Nuclear Battery is going to be public information soon then I can do what I want with it. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Jun 14 07:00:08 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id GAA10108; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 06:58:57 -0700 Resent-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 06:58:57 -0700 Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20010614093304.00a92468 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 09:58:48 -0400 To: vortex-l eskimo.com, vortex-l@eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: Re: Article about energy and food / "clunker" buy back program In-Reply-To: <3b280227.11032002 mail.midiowa.net> References: <5.0.2.1.2.20010613102043.00a92330 pop.mindspring.com> <5.0.2.1.2.20010612144542.0294b8a8 pop.mindspring.com> <5.0.2.1.2.20010612144542.0294b8a8 pop.mindspring.com> <5.0.2.1.2.20010613102043.00a92330 pop.mindspring.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <"gX80J1.0.mT2.WCCAx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43162 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Dean T. Miller wrote: >Now cut it out!! You know that if people are starving in the world >(and they are), it's due to their governments and not the inadequacy >of food supplies. Transportation is somewhat a problem, but only >somewhat. That's true, but using ethanol is a different story. First, it takes 1 unit of energy (fuel and fertilizer) to produce 2 to 4 units of ethanol fuel energy according to people who favor of using this fuel: http://www.greenfuels.org/ethafood.html That's an absurdly low return on investment; it is even worse than PV solar panels, which are a joke. Second, cars in North America consume much more energy than people do, so to produce a significant fraction of our automotive fuel, say 10%, we would have to use up enough food to feed 20 or 30 million people. That would have a major impact on the price of grain. If you are talking about enough fuel for 2% of the cars, why bother? It would be better to invest the money in fuel efficient motors. Actually, the best thing to do on this small scale, for a few hundred million dollars, would be to buy up old "clunker" automobiles for $400 to $700 each. See: http://www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/avrp/avrp.htm http://www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/avrp/avrpfaq.htm None of this applies to ethanol production from agricultural waste, such as leaves and stems, or hog manure. That may not be cost effective compared to drilling for oil, but new laws are now forcing large hog farms to treat the waste instead of dumping it into rivers. As long as they must build large scale treatment plants, they might as well engineer them to recover energy. >Please don't perpetuate the myth that using crops, that are rotting in >the bins, for fuel is somehow depriving starving people of food. It would deprive people if it was done on a large enough scale to make a difference to our energy consumption. - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Jun 14 07:42:21 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id HAA24234; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 07:41:33 -0700 Resent-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 07:41:33 -0700 Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20010614103654.02947d28 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 10:41:33 -0400 To: vortex-L eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: Electric cable fire in Washington, DC Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <"r_7CW2.0.Ww5.TqCAx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43163 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: A different kind of electricity crisis. See: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A63970-2001Jun13.html Manhole Fire Shuts Down Georgetown Power Outages Anger Residents, Business Owners; Street Closure Clogs Rush-Hour Traffic Thursday, June 14, 2001; Page B01 Smoke and flames billowed once again from manholes in Georgetown yesterday afternoon, knocking out electricity, throwing the rush hour into confusion, and shutting down one of the city's most vibrant commercial strips. The fiery eruption from beneath the brick sidewalks of M Street NW around 3:30 p.m. prompted expressions of exasperation, touched off a flurry of evacuations from stores and restaurants and left the normally bustling thoroughfare in steamy paralysis. Under a smoky haze, and amid fears of further outbreaks, the street filled with emergency vehicles but was closed to other traffic east of Wisconsin Avenue. That choked off one of the major commuter routes out of downtown Washington. On one of the hottest days of the year, electricity was cut off to about 1,600 homes and businesses, halting computers and cash registers, not to mention refrigerators and air conditioning units. . . . One of the most violent underground explosions occurred only a few feet away on M Street in February 2000, flinging a manhole cover into the air. . . . A preliminary investigation indicated that the fire started around 30th and M streets possibly as a result of a short circuit or other fault in a secondary system, Potomac Electric Power Co. officials said. They said it spread east along a main cable. Pepco announced a $30 million plan last month to replace its aging underground electrical network in Georgetown, as a means of solving the chronic problem. . . . - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Jun 14 08:16:09 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id IAA04855; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 08:15:23 -0700 Resent-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 08:15:23 -0700 Message-ID: <004201c0f4da$3fbbe420$45181ad8 oemcomputer> From: "Bruce Meland" To: "Patrick Bailey" Cc: Subject: Re: Barn roof free energy Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 06:59:34 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Resent-Message-ID: <"1sZfE3.0.iB1.BKDAx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43164 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Hey Patrick; What strings are attatched to the $100,000? Does Your friend have exclusive control of the technology or is it a gift for the cause? Or some arrangement in between these 2 extremes? Bruce, Electrifying Times -----Original Message----- From: Patrick Bailey To: Bruce Meland Date: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 1:27 PM Subject: Re: Barn roof free energy >My friend Chris will write a check for $100,000.00 for R&D if he >likes the video he sees. > >Any inventor that cannot get a quality videotape together should just >forget it anyway. > > >>The book is not too much on his intrepretation of key free energy systems >>just some very basic and extensive information that Peter has spent many >>years gathering about the Gray Motor Patents and experimentation and also >>some similar on Tesla's radiant energy devices. You can save a lot of time >>and money doing a literature search before trying your ideas out in >>experimentation. I am not sure who this Frederick character is but he >>sounds pretty closeminded, know it all, perhaps a very regimented German or >>Dutchman. I would like to know what sucesses he has had in the energy or >>other related fields. I know a few inventors that have found how to heat >>water in a revolutionary way and will be visiting one soon but i am sure he >>is not going to share his key secrets on any level with some know it all >>vortexians or want all info for free. Most of the good talented inventors >>have spent 10 years and thousands of dollars of their hard earned money, >>getting their free energy devices to an acceptable level or gathering >>information and printing a book and can't afford to take the time to answer >>all questions. Most real talented inventors do not need to waste their time >>networking the net. Bruce >>-----Original Message----ed >>From: thomas malloy >>To: vortex-l eskimo.com >>Date: Sunday, June 03, 2001 11:22 PM >>Subject: Re: Barn roof free energy >> >> >> >>----- Original Message ----- >> >>From: "Bruce Meland" >> >>To: >> >>Cc: ; ; >> >>Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2001 12:47 PM >> >>Subject: Re: Barn roof free energy >> >> >> >>Bruce, >> >> >> >>I think you would've been better off to have spent that $37.00 plus S & H >>on a >> >>"Shrink". :-) >> >> >> >>Regards, Frederick >> > >> >I agree, I linked to Dr. Lindermann's site from Jerry Decker's site. >> >I asked him some pointed questions. I have yet to receive a reply. >> >Bottom line, anybody can write a book, but it takes a break through >> >to heat water. >> > >> >> >> >> >> >>> I think you serious tinkerers would save a lot of time and money if you >> >>> purchased the recent published book "The Free Energy Secrets of Cold >> >> > Electricity by Dr. Peter Lindemann for about $37, includes shipping >>and >> > >> > > > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Jun 14 08:27:41 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id IAA11699; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 08:26:26 -0700 Resent-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 08:26:26 -0700 Message-ID: <007701c0f4db$c8b823a0$45181ad8 oemcomputer> From: "Bruce Meland" To: Cc: "Vortex" Subject: Re: A parable for Bruce Meland Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 07:10:34 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Resent-Message-ID: <"oPt-y1.0.hs2.XUDAx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43165 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Keith; Naturally the inventor at his request or myself will not reveal too many details as secercy is paramount and additional funding is needed, but if you live in the Midwest perhaps I could arrange for you to observe some of the technology. Let me know if you are interested. Bruce -----Original Message----- From: Keith Nagel To: Bruce Meland Cc: Vortex Date: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 9:59 PM Subject: RE: A parable for Bruce Meland >Well Bruce, are you ready to provide us with some factual information >about the increasing bizarre claims you've been making on vortex? >Or more black helicopters, disappearing prototypes, mystery inventors... > >Jed pointed out the reality of suppression, but I'd like to add one >more point. Disinformation can be spread about a subject to the point >where it becomes impossible for any intelligent dialog to occur. >I used to think such actions were orchestrated, but now feel >it's an organic process. Perhaps an expression of Freud's Thanatos? > >Instead of making a lot of specious assumptions about me and the >rest of the list members, how about some real information or >discussion? > >K. > >-----Original Message----- >From: Bruce Meland [mailto:etimes teleport.com] >Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 4:16 PM >To: knagel gis.net; Vortex >Subject: Re: A parable for Bruce Meland > > >Keith you are the one that is nieve and probably some low level technician >that is living in the past or with very regimented classic electrodynamics >perceptions. I just happen to get around and have been networking with real >inventors, not stuck in some little shop or garage cranking out printed >circuit boards or the stuck in corner of some establishment corp. shop. >This technology has nothing to do with religion or a parable. Just some >wizzard inventors, one with a PHD in EE and good at origional work and not >the regurgitaor type that ends up at some University. One of the wizzards >was key developer of fiber optics. Keith you just have blinders on! Bruce >From: Keith Nagel >To: Vortex >Date: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 12:27 PM >Subject: A parable for Bruce Meland > > >>Hi All. >> >>Many moons ago, I had the experience of working with a Born >>Again Christian. You know the type. Anyway, he kept trying >>to convert the heathens in the office to the one true faith. >>One day, the following exchange took place. >> >>Bob: "Blah Blah accept Jesus blah blah going to hell etc etc" >> >>Me: "Bob, do you mean to say that if I don't accept jesus I'm going to >hell" >> >>Bob : "Yes!" >> >>Me: "OK. What about if I never heard of Jesus. Do I automatically go to >>hell?" >> >>Bob: "uhhh, I suppose so yes" >> >>Me: "Hmm... What about babys, buddhists, etc." >> >>Bob: "uhmmmmmmm yeah" >> >>Me: "Damn Bob, that seems pretty cruel. Babies?" >> >>Bob: long pause...furrowed brow "OK, what happens is they go to limbo and >>get judged >> on individual merit" >> >>Me: "So, basically, what you're trying to do is maximize the number of >souls >> going to heaven, hence the prosteletizing?" >> >>Bob: "Yup" >> >>Me: "So if you succeed in convincing me, I go to heaven" >> >>Bob: sensing victory "Yes!" >> >>Me: "and if you fail, if your oratory skills are insufficient or your >> logic is unappealing, or I feel bad 'cause my girlfriend fought >> with me, and I don't accept this, I go to hell" >> >>Bob: "Uhmm Yeah." >> >>Me: "That's a lot of responsibility Bob. I may live a good life, but >because >> of your inability to argue a point, to present any factual data >> to back up your claim, I'm damned to hell. Just for hearing you" >> >>Bob: Blinks. >> >>Me: "So it would seem, that the best way to maximize the number of good >> souls in heaven, is to keep this a great secret. Don't tell anyone. >> Then, we'll be judged on merit and not on your ability to argue, >> which frankly is greatly lacking. >> >>Bob: Mouth opens. >> >>Me: "Already you've damned half the department to an eternity of torment. >> Please stop." >> >> >> > > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Jun 14 08:53:24 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id IAA21529; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 08:51:30 -0700 Resent-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 08:51:30 -0700 Message-ID: <008c01c0f4df$48245980$45181ad8 oemcomputer> From: "Bruce Meland" To: Subject: Re: Raids and helicopters prove nothing Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 07:35:36 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Resent-Message-ID: <"q8Lte1.0.IG5.1sDAx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43166 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Hi Jeff; This is confidental; I will be visiting said inventor near Wooster OH next weekend. If you live near there perhaps I can arrange for you to come along and observe. Or if you know of someone if you can not make it. It would still be at the approval of the inventor. There is another inventor in th ePhillipines that has similar technology that want's 10 million for the rights to the technology. I have videos of both technologies and contacts that have visited and observed the technology and say it is real. The problem is that it is too revolutionary. Keep in touch. Bruce -----Original Message----- From: Jeff & Dorothy Kooistra To: vortex-l eskimo.com Date: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 5:12 PM Subject: Re: Raids and helicopters prove nothing >Bruce, > >> Jeff; It has been 6 year since I have talked face to face with the >inventors >> who have had active suppression experiences. I may have an opportunity in >the >> near future as Toyota is soon paying my way to an Event in the Midwest. > >I live in the Midwest--when and where? (Or isn't it a public event?) > >> Perhaps I will get a more complete story as to what technology was taken >> and by whom and what his plans are..., > >Unless you get this, no one will be inclined to take you seriously. I'm >willing to listen, but I am not a source of money. I'm also willing to >believe that active suppression happens, but that's a long way from >believing every story I'm told. By the way, why do you believe the guy? > >> I just mentioned all these >> very brief stories to get some feedback of what may be the best approach >to >> get the revolutionary free energy technology onboard for future >generations >> to use, without completely destroying the planet. > >Well, look--if the guy is being actively suppressed, then the worst thing >you could do is start broadcasting about him via vortex and other web sites. >Any group capable of staging black helicopter raids can certainly have >someone monitor vortex on a regular basis. > >> The first effort is to bring to the public awareness that such >technologies exist.(There are >> several publications out there = www.free-energy.cc and the other one I >> believe is www.searchforforfreeenergy.com (Also my publication coming up >> and others like Infinite Energy.) > >None of these avenues will bring all that much public awareness--they tend >to reach only those who don't need to be reached anymore. Greer's big >public UFO meeting at the National Press Club has a better chance, though >even that was pretty much a one or two day story. The public will become >aware when they can hold working devices in their hands. Prior to that, you >don't need the public--you need a guy with money to convince so you can make >the products. > >kooistra > > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Jun 14 13:15:23 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id NAA06222; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 13:12:59 -0700 Resent-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 13:12:59 -0700 Message-ID: <001101c0f503$ccf9bdc0$63181ad8 oemcomputer> From: "Bruce Meland" To: Cc: Subject: Re: Raids and helicopters prove nothing Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 11:57:01 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Resent-Message-ID: <"YYnE.0.rW1.9hHAx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43167 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Hey Jed; Want to make a $#00,000 bet that i can't take you to a demonstration of the technology to prove that the technology exist. And possibly even arrange a demonstration that whould bring in a swat team. The $300,000 is what it has cost the inventors to get them out of jail including legal fees. This is a reality Jed. Get your head out of the academic sand and into the National security State real world. Bruce -----Original Message----- From: Jed Rothwell To: vortex-l eskimo.com ; vortex-l@eskimo.com Date: Friday, May 25, 2001 3:07 PM Subject: Re: Raids and helicopters prove nothing >thomas malloy wrote: > >>. . . In addition to the possibility that Mr. X is liar, consider this. If >>the invisible government, the IG, is sending it's goon squads to stop him, >>what chance would any investor or organization have of successfully >>marketing the product? > >I hadn't thought of that. You are right, but it might be fun to try to >devise a scheme to beat the goon squads. You need an elaborate plan in >which 100 prototypes are manufactured secretly, out of sight of the IG, and >placed in cities all around the world for a coordinated, simultaneous mass >unveiling. It would make a good SF story! > >For that matter, what don't the goons come this afternoon and take away >this "latest model." Why do they let him build anything, ever? Surely they >have wiretaps and cameras. They must see him going to Radio Shack for >another load of supplies. If he can build one "latest model" >prototype, there must be a way to outwit them and build a hundred. > >- Jed > > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Jun 14 13:15:40 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id NAA06829; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 13:14:04 -0700 Resent-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 13:14:04 -0700 Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 16:20:19 -0400 (EDT) From: John Schnurer To: Frederick Sparber cc: vortex-l eskimo.com, jlsparber@earthlink.net Subject: Other Hyrogen fuel In-Reply-To: <031e01c0f2cb$71f5f040$e2b4bfa8 computer> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Resent-Message-ID: <"Nem6C2.0.Cg1.8iHAx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43168 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Dear Folks, Using sun to produce hydrogen via photo and thermo voltaics a football field area will hydrogen-gas 100 cars a day.... on a sunny day. On Mon, 11 Jun 2001, Frederick Sparber wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Mike Carrell" > To: > Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 8:18 PM > Subject: Re: Hyrogen fuel economics > > Mike Carrell wrote: > > > > What the biomass calculations seem to leave out is the capital and energy > > necessary to produce the biomass. > > Ever been around a combine or corn harvester Mike? > > For every bushel of wheat or corn (60 pounds or 56 pounds) there are 60 and 56 pounds > of biomass wastes > thrown on the ground to air oxidize back to CO2. > > These could be collected and processed with the same logistics as the food crops. > > I suggest that you do a web search on biomass gasification and energy farming. :-) > > > >You are basically using plants (how many > > square miles?) as solar energy converters, and overlooking the very strong > > temptation to use fertilizers to maximize the plant growth. > > Yep a nuclear reactor 93 million miles away and no nuclear wastes to contend with. > Where do you think those > fossil fuels came from? ---------- cut-----> From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Jun 14 13:58:16 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx2.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id NAA16589; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 13:42:12 -0700 (PDT) Resent-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 13:42:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20010614162751.02947d28 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 16:41:32 -0400 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: Re: Other Hyrogen fuel In-Reply-To: References: <031e01c0f2cb$71f5f040$e2b4bfa8 computer> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <"jDMFM3.0.z24.Y6IAx" mx2> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43169 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: John Schnurer wrote: > Using sun to produce hydrogen via photo and thermo voltaics a >football field area will hydrogen-gas 100 cars a day.... on a sunny day. Unfortunately not. You would have to have 2 football fields; one to charge the cars, the other to generate the energy needed to make the PVs in the first place. The lifetime total input:output energy ratio of a PV ranges from 1:2 to 1:6 according to PV industry sources, assuming the device lasts 15 to 20 years, which is optimistic. Basically, a PV is a good way to move energy from the PV factory to some other location. It is a great way to power a hand calculator or an isolated roadside telephone, but for large scale energy generation it would be economic lunacy. Parabolic collectors or newer types of PV may solve this problem. Some PVs are made from reject silicon from electronics that would otherwise go into the trash heap. I am not sure, but I believe most of the embodied energy in a PV is put there during the production of the silicon, so it makes economic sense to use this waste material for PVs. It is kind of like generating energy from hog manure; by itself that process would not economically competitive with fossil fuel, but since the material has to be processed anyway, for other reasons, we might as well derive energy as a byproduct. - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Jun 14 15:05:42 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id PAA32321; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 15:05:01 -0700 Resent-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 15:05:01 -0700 Message-ID: <002101c0f537$7b3ee620$0845ccd1 asus> From: "Mike Carrell" To: References: <031e01c0f2cb$71f5f040$e2b4bfa8 computer> <5.0.2.1.2.20010614162751.02947d28@pop.mindspring.com> Subject: Re: Other Hyrogen fuel Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 18:06:13 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Resent-Message-ID: <"-4DZ11.0.wu7.DKJAx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43170 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Jed is correct in insisting on life-cycle costs when looking at global energy solutions. I have seen presentations, some decades ago, showing how covering one state with PV cells would power the nation, or covering the existing superhighways would do the job. Yes, the energy is there. Yes, one can build triple-layer PV cells, extending their collection bandwidths, and get efficiencies of 25% -- at a price. Yes, one can build passive and directed collector systems and get 10 Sol gains. Those systems cost money and require maintenance. The use of PV systems for local use in the developing world is the largest market. There the disadvantages can be tolerated, for a modest amount of energy can make a big difference in a village's lifestyle. Using PVs or wind power to energize the civilization we have won't fly with the technology in hand. We don't look at total systems cost most of the time. Mike Carrell From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Jun 14 15:22:52 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id PAA07011; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 15:21:25 -0700 Resent-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 15:21:25 -0700 Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 18:27:50 -0400 (EDT) From: John Schnurer Reply-To: John Schnurer To: Jed Rothwell cc: vortex-l eskimo.com, Schnurer Subject: Re: Other Hyrogen fuel In-Reply-To: <5.0.2.1.2.20010614162751.02947d28 pop.mindspring.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Resent-Message-ID: <"xCuN82.0.Oj1.ZZJAx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43171 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Dear Jed, The energy you get out of a PV is not "put into it" in manufacture. Wherever did you get this idea? PV and TV together will do the job in one football field's worth of space. I am expecting the autos to come in one at a time. On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Jed Rothwell wrote: > John Schnurer wrote: > > > Using sun to produce hydrogen via photo and thermo voltaics a > >football field area will hydrogen-gas 100 cars a day.... on a sunny day. > > Unfortunately not. You would have to have 2 football fields; one to charge 34n 3> the cars, the other to generate the energy needed to make the PVs in the > first place. The lifetime total input:output energy ratio of a PV ranges > from 1:2 to 1:6 according to PV industry sources, assuming the device lasts > 15 to 20 years, which is optimistic. Basically, a PV is a good way to move > energy from the PV factory to some other location. It is a great way to > power a hand calculator or an isolated roadside telephone, but for large > scale energy generation it would be economic lunacy. > > Parabolic collectors or newer types of PV may solve this problem. > > Some PVs are made from reject silicon from electronics that would otherwise > go into the trash heap. ???????? I am not sure, but I believe most of the embodied > energy in a PV is put there during the production of the silicon, I don't get what you.... you mean you think the electricity from a PV cell is determined by something other than direct energy conversion of electromagnetic energy of photons? Woa! Let me know how this works. And why don't you read the standard reasons physics works? Where did does your phsics come from? makes economic sense to use this waste material for PVs. It is kind of like > generating energy from hog manure; by itself that process would not > economically competitive with fossil fuel, but since the material has to be > processed anyway, for other reasons, we might as well derive energy as a > byproduct. > > - Jed > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Jun 14 15:44:49 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id PAA16440; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 15:43:43 -0700 Resent-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 15:43:43 -0700 Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20010614181547.0294c418 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 18:43:20 -0400 To: vortex-l eskimo.com, From: Jed Rothwell Subject: Re: Other Hyrogen fuel In-Reply-To: <002101c0f537$7b3ee620$0845ccd1 asus> References: <031e01c0f2cb$71f5f040$e2b4bfa8 computer> <5.0.2.1.2.20010614162751.02947d28 pop.mindspring.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <"STfOh.0.X04.QuJAx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43172 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Mike Carrell wrote: >Using PVs or wind power to energize the civilization we have won't fly with >the technology in hand. We don't look at total systems cost most of the >time. Wind power is economically viable in many parts of the world. Not here in Georgia or in Japan, but in places like Iowa or Wales it is quite competitive. The embodied energy payback time is 3 months, compared to about 1 month for a fossil fuel plant, or up to 6 years with PVs. In 1999 and 2000, roughly 3.8 GW of wind power were installed world-wide, which is more than the nuclear power being installed. There are modest tax incentives to encourage wind, but nothing like the tax breaks given for gas, oil or nuclear power. All in all, the playing field is heavily slanted *against* wind power, and there is a great deal of heavy handed opposition to it in Congress from the oil and coal interests. Despite these problems, sober, bottom-line oriented electric company executives are buying $4 billion in wind equipment every year, and wind is growing more rapidly than any other source of energy. It now generates enough energy to power the state of Virginia, or half of Spain. That makes it a very large, successful source of energy -- far ahead of any other "alternative" source. Aeroderivative peak supply gas generators ranging from 1 to 4 MW are considered mainstream, big-iron, mainstream power company equipment. No one would call that kind of thing hippy alternative energy. I cannot understand why anyone would say our civilization cannot be driven by a similar 2 MW wind turbine of roughly the same size and power density (not counting the rotor blades). Until 1855, all of the world's ocean shipping was driven exclusively by wind. Megatons of goods and millions of people were carried between continents, and navies large enough to defeat Napoleon were driven exclusively by wind. The speed records of the best 1000 and 2000 ton clipper ships were not beaten by steamships until 1890. Ships like the Flying Cloud routinely travelled at 12 knots, about as fast as ordinary freight steamers from 1900 to 1950. (WWII convoy speeds ranged from 10 to 15 knots.) There is enough wind energy at sea -- in the North Sea close to land, in water less than 50 meters deep -- to drive all the electric turbines in Northern Europe. - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Jun 14 15:49:43 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id PAA19099; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 15:48:19 -0700 Resent-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 15:48:19 -0700 Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20010614184436.02972968 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 18:47:27 -0400 To: John Schnurer From: Jed Rothwell Subject: Re: Other Hyrogen fuel Cc: vortex-l eskimo.com, Schnurer In-Reply-To: References: <5.0.2.1.2.20010614162751.02947d28 pop.mindspring.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <"gQjaC.0.Ag4.oyJAx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43173 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: John Schnurer wrote: > The energy you get out of a PV is not "put into it" in >manufacture. > Wherever did you get this idea? I got this idea from world's largest manufacturer of PVs. See: http://www.siemenssolar.com/Paybackstudy.pdf I do not mean it in the literal sense; I mean that the energy required to manufacture PVs, the so-called "embodied" energy, is so great that the PV must be run for 2 to 6 years to generate that much energy again and pay it back. Since PVs only last 10 to 15 years (20 at most, under ideal circumstances) this is a losing proposition. PVs are wonderful devices, with many important uses, but they have nothing to do with large scale energy generation. - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Jun 14 17:07:30 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx2.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id RAA03567; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 17:05:33 -0700 (PDT) Resent-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 17:05:33 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 18:59:08 -0400 (EDT) From: John Schnurer To: thomas malloy cc: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: time distortion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Resent-Message-ID: <"hS1hC.0.at.B5LAx" mx2> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43174 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: I did not see the post. Do you know, specfically, by what means this is cerified? On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, thomas malloy wrote: > I'm disappointed that no one responded to my post on the time > distortion machine. Come on people, this is time he's bending, not > iron bars! > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Jun 14 20:47:53 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id UAA12603; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 20:46:19 -0700 Resent-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 20:46:19 -0700 From: Standing Bear To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Electric cable fire in Washington, DC Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 23:51:00 -0700 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.1.99] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" References: <5.0.2.1.2.20010614103654.02947d28 pop.mindspring.com> In-Reply-To: <5.0.2.1.2.20010614103654.02947d28 pop.mindspring.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01061423510001.00884 linux> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id UAA12558 Resent-Message-ID: <"8uNko1.0.i43.AKOAx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43175 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: On Thursday 14 June 2001 07:41, Jed Rothwell wrote: > A different kind of electricity crisis. See: > > http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A63970-2001Jun13.html > > Manhole Fire Shuts Down Georgetown > > Power Outages Anger Residents, Business Owners; Street Closure Clogs > Rush-Hour Traffic > > Thursday, June 14, 2001; Page B01 > > Smoke and flames billowed once again from manholes in Georgetown yesterday > afternoon, knocking out electricity, throwing the rush hour into confusion, > and shutting down one of the city's most vibrant commercial strips. > > The fiery eruption from beneath the brick sidewalks of M Street NW around > 3:30 p.m. prompted expressions of exasperation, touched off a flurry of > evacuations from stores and restaurants and left the normally bustling > thoroughfare in steamy paralysis. > > Under a smoky haze, and amid fears of further outbreaks, the street filled > with emergency vehicles but was closed to other traffic east of Wisconsin > Avenue. That choked off one of the major commuter routes out of downtown > Washington. > > On one of the hottest days of the year, electricity was cut off to about > 1,600 homes and businesses, halting computers and cash registers, not to > mention refrigerators and air conditioning units. . . . > > One of the most violent underground explosions occurred only a few feet > away on M Street in February 2000, flinging a manhole cover into the air. . . . > > A preliminary investigation indicated that the fire started around 30th and > M streets possibly as a result of a short circuit or other fault in a > secondary system, Potomac Electric Power Co. officials said. They said it > spread east along a main cable. > > Pepco announced a $30 million plan last month to replace its aging > underground electrical network in Georgetown, as a means of solving the > chronic problem. . . . > > - Jed CHUD's been busy! From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Jun 15 01:11:05 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id BAA27445; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 01:10:21 -0700 Resent-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 01:10:21 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: eskimo.com: billb owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 01:10:18 -0700 (PDT) From: William Beaty To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Reply to Jeds mail (fwd) Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Resent-Message-ID: <"lPL5i3.0.ki6.jBSAx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43176 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: mail from a non-subscriber (below) ((((((((((((((((((((( ( ( ( ( (O) ) ) ) ) ))))))))))))))))))))) William J. Beaty SCIENCE HOBBYIST website billb eskimo.com http://www.amasci.com EE/programmer/sci-exhibits science projects, tesla, weird science Seattle, WA 206-789-0775 freenrg-L taoshum-L vortex-L webhead-L ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 18:03:09 -0700 From: JCarey9622 aol.com To: etimes teleport.com, jedrothwell@infinite-energy.com, vortex-l eskimo.com, beenergy@telusplanet.net Subject: Reply to Jeds mail >From Jed Rothwell to the vortex group If they will demonstrate and sell prototypes to me, I will bring them >millions immediately, and billions in a few years. They would not even to >sell me shares of the company; just license me to sell the machines. I am >100% serious about this........ Reply From Jack Carey Confidential Technologies Flint Mi. An overall view. To Jed I do not know who you are referring to. SIR Every thing I told you was the truth. I will ask about the cost of the restart for Natural Magnet Motor. Ken did see the unit and the material that produces the fields that run it.. I hope someone else besides us has something we would like to see it. It would make it easier on us. At this point Jed I do not think anyone on this planet is on our level in regard to generating power that actually does something usefull without consumption. I may be wrong. We are real bored as you are I assume with situations that do not make coffee as Gene Mallove says. Also we are light years beyond TESLA. And anyone can make cute toys. But if that is what you want instead of serious Tech. that will power up this planet for the next few hundred years we will obligee. Jed if you can bring Millions to the table it may be the time to consider doing it. If you wait the chance will be gone. Please do not make the same mistake that Gene is making. But that is your business. If your a visionary in any way it may be time to use that ability or at least investigate my claims first hand.. The inventor did reinvent and refine some of TESLA'S stuff 20 years ago. And will do more. The timing is right this time to introduce it was not right then. I have only been involved 2 years. As a promoter. Ken from Infinite saw our stuff and did not understand it. Gene did not come and it appears that he does not either. We stopped short on giving them any more Info. on the obsolete 220 to 3 Phase that they think is revolutionary. We told them how do make it until we were blue in the face and they still did not get it. The mechanic that use to be a truck driver that came with the East coast group Memorial Day weekend is not haveing a problem following instructions. My guess is he is self taught and does not have a linear education standing in his way that is stopping him from understanding how to recreate it. What do you think?..Sir I'm not trying to be arrogant or presumptions or a smart ass in any way. But those are the facts . If our more advanced Tech. works and can be sold to the public what is the difference. We have 20 million Amish waiting for the 80 Amp true sine wave DC to AC 220 V with a 100 Amp surge is that is self contained. They do not care about verification from Infinite Energy or anybody else. At this point we do not either. The 110 to 3 phase by itself could be a major product but we have progressed far beyond it. It is not a toy and could bite hard if misused. That is the main reason we will not market it by itself. If our advanced stuff Works as advertised we feel that is the key. Any Negative or positive comment from you would be appreciated. That is the point that I think they are missing at Infinite. With what has happened since they came here. We do not need them anymore. They had there chance and they blew it. It is there loss not ours. Gene is to arrogant for us Plus he is a control type. We really liked Ken. Plus we will need a chemist in time and he is very qualified. We shall see. Plus we were told by several people that they would only use the 220 to 3 phase to get funding. Maybe you could see the chance of a lifetime. As the East coast Co. did that is flying us out the week after the fourth. Our stuff is Not for sale. Just licensing. Money or glory is not that important either. The money is nice to have. I'm sending the flight info. that they sent us to possibly prove that we are for real. The main goal is preserving our planet for our decedents. We are not that important. We only think we are. We are destroying our environment because of our greed and unwillingness to change. We feel It is our duty to our grandchildren to do everything in our power to reverse that process if we can. I have pontificated enough........ > >If a prototype machine can be fabricated for less than $10,000, so-called >"deep pockets" are not called for, and in fact people with lots of money, >power and influence would be more trouble than they are worth. Most major >discoveries have succeeded without established financial backing. In fact, >most required no outside investment capital until they matured into billion >dollar industries. One of the perverse ideas popularized during the dot-com >boom was that new ventures require hundreds of millions of dollars. A >dot-com venture or the device described by Meland are both easily scaled >from a handful of employees in a garage to thousands of employees. This >kind of venture would not require more than $100,000 to launch. If the >machine is real, I can and will launch it myself in a few weeks. Reply The larger the investment The higher the percentage of the return .> > > Some of the name calling > > on this list is counterproductive and is indicitative of low level > > technicians. > >Nonsense. No one is "calling names." We are demanding substance instead of >hot air. > > A truce on this kind of activity would be in the best interest > > of all concerned > >What does that mean? Mr. Meland want to publish imaginary claims without a >shred of evidence, and he does not want anyone else to demand proof, or >rigor, or even the names of the inventors! Whenever he is challenged to >provide the smallest detail, he refuses. We are not allowed warn people >that such claims typically published by scam artists trolling for victims. >What Meland is doing is unethical, unscientific and contrary to the spirit >and purpose of this mailing list. It would be in the best interests of >everyone here if he would put up or shut up. If he is allowed to publish >this kind of garbage indefinitely, he will degrade this mailing list until >it is no better than the Keelynet. Already, several scientists have told me >privately they are signing off. Jed REPLY Mr Meland has not seen our stuff but has talked to a Amish physicist engineer that has been here. I agree about scam artists and big money that wants to control. Big money that wants to make a difference is a different story. We have run into the scam's to . The plasma fusion reactor guy is one of them from what we can tell. We talked to him the other day. He gives people that may really have something a bad name. But the fact is. Mr. Meland is bound by confidentiality with us. He may have a real tiger by the tail and I'm possibly one of those tails. The tiger is the inventor. There may be others also I do not know at this point but will find out soon if anyone else is on our level..As of yet we have not found anyone. But keep looking and hopeing. He may be able to shut up anyone he wants to that thinks they know it all real soon.. (We are the first ones to admit that we do not know it all.) We will make sure of that if he wants to.. Because he has help us more than he knows as Dr. Hal Fox has without asking for anything in return. I feel That is the mark of a real gentlemen that wants to see positive changes happen in our society. Jack Carey non technical spokes person.. Everybody take your best shot if you want to or come here and possibly broaden your horizons as others have. It will be necessary to discard your conventual knowledge about electricity first..Sorry things change and new provable knowledge that can be physically demonstrated prevails. We will blow a few accepted theories away for you if you decide to come as a bonus. And replace them with news ones that actually work. Anybody Game. This is not a perpetual motion claim so do not even go there. TESLA did a lot of it 100 years ago so it is nothing new. Blame our worthless education system for not teaching Tesla .And our Govt. for trying to suppress solutions. If our system would encourage creative thinking instead of preaching conformity we would not have all the environmental problems we do.. Excuse the length of this mail and my barley adequate and unscientific writing abilities. Plus all the sub standard words I use. No body is perfect. If my points are not clear call me. We will be coming out with several diverse and radical new Technologies that may have profound effects. He is looking for the answer to Zero time presently he feels the current conclusion is a paradox. The speed of light theory does not work as it stands. What has been accomplished is Einstein's quantum mechanics, the three fold unified theory and string and super string theories has been combined into one situation that actually works? A statement that bold should fire up everybody. Be prepared to play hard ball if necessary if you talk to the inventor. He can converse at the Ph.D. level and far beyond present day knowledge in about 9 different areas of science. Put him to the test but be prepared to be tested also. He has created new physics that will be published in time.. Infinite Energy did not have a clue what he was talking about. Even linear educated Nobel prize winning physicists get lost after a few minutes because they are trying to understand the process not the advanced concept's.. Plus his inventions will fall apart in pieces or implode if you try to reverse engineer them. That does not mean that no one can do it. If you can reverse engineer our stuff we want to talk to you and have you join our team if possible or a least make a deal with you. that will benefit both party's. High end self taught Auto mechanics or promoters like me do not have a problem with the concepts. He does not release the processes and will not until they become obsolete like the 220 to 3 phase.. . DOW CORNING said he was a living version of Einstein and TESLA. Anybody want to play. I'm not joking and I do not care if anyone believes the statement.. I know it is the truth. In time the world will know it also. We are looking forward to speaking with anyone that wants to make a positive difference in our society. Two heads are better than one. No arrogant attitude's on this end..Only Respect for anyone that contacts us. 810 744 9587 Home Page 810 812 4033 enter No. or Email He is only available to talk Sat. afternoons and evenings. Except the first week of July. He will be off then. Thank You for your time. > > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Jun 15 02:07:25 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id CAA08446; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 02:06:26 -0700 Resent-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 02:06:26 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: eskimo.com: billb owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 02:06:16 -0700 (PDT) From: William Beaty To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Carbon-arcs producing iron... any news? In-Reply-To: <003101c0ff87$d52df2c0$9f89cacf compaq> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Resent-Message-ID: <"pydZn.0.m32.E0TAx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43177 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: For the upcoming keelynet conference I'm going to demo the production of magnetic particles in carbon arcs. This was discussed on vortex back around early 1997 I believe, and a bit from Gene Mallove can be found at http://www.amasci.com/freenrg/carbiron.txt. I was given some spectrograph carbons (analysis ~2ppm silicon and manganese), and they make "iron" bits just as readily as do the projector arc-lamp carbons. Has anyone heard any recent news about this? ((((((((((((((((((((( ( ( ( ( (O) ) ) ) ) ))))))))))))))))))))) William J. Beaty SCIENCE HOBBYIST website billb eskimo.com http://www.amasci.com EE/programmer/sci-exhibits science projects, tesla, weird science Seattle, WA 206-789-0775 freenrg-L taoshum-L vortex-L webhead-L From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Jun 15 04:48:11 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id EAA24520; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 04:47:29 -0700 Resent-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 04:47:29 -0700 Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 00:57:26 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner MTAONLINE.NET (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: What happened to Horace Heffner? Resent-Message-ID: <"1RrHR.0.s-5.ENVAx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43178 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 12:20 AM 6/13/1, Mitchell Jones wrote: >Is Horace just busy doing other things, or is he ill? I haven't seen a post >from him for a very long time. --MJ Just busy doing other things, but thanks for noticing! I read about 1 in 10 vortex posts once in a while. Not much going on. Looks like vortex has lost its serious character. It seems to be almost all popular science stuff now. My interests have been displaced toward some pure math lately, no physics. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Jun 15 10:14:20 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id KAA26562; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 10:13:29 -0700 Resent-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 10:13:29 -0700 Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20010615130437.00a8f740 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 13:13:22 -0400 To: vortex-L eskimo.com, JCarey9622@aol.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: Confidential Technologies, Flint MI Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <"2Wkxm.0.ZU6.s8aAx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43179 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Yesterday someone named Jack Carey called me on the telephone, and I see he has now published a message here on Vortex. He is one of the people Bruce Meland has referred to. He makes many extravagant and unbelievable claims. Let me report a few of them here. What he told me does not square with what he has told other people, and he kept changing the story. His descriptions are difficult to sort out because he mixes up power and energy, as well as watts, amps, volts, radiation and magnetism. First, he has a device which supposedly inputs 990 watts single phase AC and outputs 11,250 watts 3-phase AC, yet for some reason, it cannot be run in a self-sustaining mode. I tried several times to explain what that means, and Carey gave me quite a long song-and-dance response. The gist of it is, they are planning to make it self-sustain, and they hope to do it soon, but the task will require $20 million. Second, he already has a self-sustaining device, a smaller version the size of a shoebox. He has not mentioned this machine to other people who have visited him and spoken with him recently; I do not know why he chose to reveal it to me, but since I am not under any kind of Non Disclosure Agreement (NDA) I suppose there is no harm in reporting it here. This machine worked in a self-sustaining mode either 10, 15 or 20 years ago, depending on which version of the story he tells. I asked whether the machine still exists, and why it cannot be turned on again. He said the machine is perfectly intact, but it is dangerous, it emits magnetic fields that will "mess up your DNA" if you stand closer than 30 feet away from the machine. I said, "in that case why don't you run it in a location 30 feet away from anyone?" He said you have to stand directly over the machine when you start it up. I asked "How do you start it? Why can't that be done from a distance? It took me several minutes to explain what I had in mind. Here is a sample of the exchange, to the best of my memory: Me:"Why not power it up with a 30 foot long wire?" JC: "It doesn't start with electricity." Me: "Then how does it start, with a rope or a lanyard, like a lawn mower?" JC: "No, you put the magnetism into the thing. When you assemble it, it starts up." Me: "What precisely do you mean? What do you do with your hand that makes the thing go?" JC: "You assemble it." Me: "I guess you mean put the top on, or screw the equipment case shut. So why can't you perform the last step of assembly from a safe distance away?" JC: "You mean with a robot? That would take tons of money! 20 million!" Me: "I hardly think so . . . Just the last stage of putting the case together . . ." JC: "We just can't control the thing." Me: "But you told me earlier you ran it for years, sometimes continuously for months at a time. And it is still in perfect repair, left just as it was the last time you demonstrated it to the people from Corning. You were able to control it all those years, why can't you control it now?" JC: "We need to develop a new one, for $20 million, with a plastic shell to prevent the 20 megacycle magnetism from hurting your DNA." Me: "That's fascinating, but if plastic will do the job, why not devise a plastic case for the old machine?" JC: "I'll get back to you on that." This will give the reader a sense of how difficult it is communicate with Mr. Carey. Apparently, although they ran the machine many times over a period of years, they never devised a simple way to turn it on and off. Finally, he described a third device. They are a few weeks away from developing a cigarette lighter that generates Brown's Gas from a watch battery and runs on water. I said I would like to buy a dozen of those things, at any price he cares to name. He said they will not be for sale. I asked what is the point of having all these wonderful gadgets if they are not for sale. He said he would get back to me with a price, but in the meanwhile would I be interested in investing. I said no. In his message to posted here, Carey repeats some of these claims. He says: "And anyone can make cute toys." I asked him to make a small, self sustaining version his device, but he said no, they will only make huge ones, large enough for a house or a neighborhood. As far as I know, nobody has ever made a "cute toy" that does the things he describes. Naturally, as far as I know this is utterly impossible, but I would be willing to go look at one after seeing a video of a "cute toy" in operation. Carey hopes to prevent all of his customers from reverse engineering the product. I mentioned that the U.L. and all government and state regulatory agencies demand a complete description of the product and working models -- in essence they demand that you reverse engineer it for them, and tell the world every detail of every machine sold in the U.S. He did not believe this, or he discounted it, insisting that he will be allowed to sell to "Amish" people. All of the Amish people I have encountered live in Pennsylvania, which has a strong regulatory and consumer protection agencies, and Amish people are generally prudent, law abiding folks who will not risk their health or fire insurance with untested, uncertified, revolutionary technology. I personally would not *think* of bringing a large, mysterious, energy-generating machine anywhere near my house until it had been tested exhaustively for years by government and private agencies, including exposure to lab rats and primates. I doubt that Carey will find many people willing to do this, and I am quite sure he cannot prevent people from reverse engineering these machines. Any attempt to do so is a futile waste of time, and any business plan that depends upon finding customers who will not reverse engineer is doomed. Carey writes: "Jed if you can bring Millions to the table it may be the time to consider doing it." No, it will be the time when Carey or someone else in his organization makes a coherent case for doing so, when they give me some credible evidence the machine(s) actually exist, and they describe a plan which might generate a profit. He writes: "The inventor did reinvent and refine some of TESLA'S stuff 20 years ago." I do not believe that Tesla himself, or anyone else, ever built any of the machines he describe. I think all of these claims are hogwash. I will not be persuaded otherwise by words or bold claims made by scientific illiterates such as Carey. If he wishes to persuade me -- or anyone else -- he will have to provide actual evidence, including a description of the device, test data, and a video. I mentioned that most major discoveries have succeeded without established financial backing. Carey replies: "The larger the investment The higher the percentage of the return." This answer makes no sense whatsoever. The largest private fortune in the world, belonging to Bill Gates, began with an "investment" of two meters of paper tape. No other outside investment was ever required; Microsoft could have been purely self-financing, but it grew so large that some of the stockholders and the SEC asked Gates to take it public. The second largest private fortune, belonging to the Ford family, was self-financed from 1903 until Ford went public in 1956. The size of the initial investment in a venture of this nature has absolutely nothing to do with the eventual return, except in old-line, high capital, established industries, mining and the like. Carey modestly describes his own role: Jack Carey non technical spokes person.. That hardly does justice. Despite this non technical role, he speaks: What has been accomplished is Einstein's quantum mechanics, the three fold unified theory and string and super string theories has been combined into one situation that actually works? A statement that bold should fire up everybody. Indeed, I am so fired up I can barely breath. Unfortunately, I have no clue what this might mean, and I suspect it means absolutely nothing. In any case, Carey does not understand some basic mechanics and simple concepts about energy and electricity, so I doubt he understands quantum mechanics or string theory. He is, at best, parroting someone else. If he or that other person wishes to convince anyone outside of their circle, they should start with me, because I am more open minded than a typical university professor. All they have to do is present simple, credible, experimental evidence. The string theory can stay in the box. - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Jun 15 11:21:03 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id LAA24862; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 11:20:15 -0700 Resent-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 11:20:15 -0700 Message-ID: <000601c0f5c7$fb74d990$0c6cd626 varisys.com> From: "George Holz" To: References: Subject: Re: Carbon-arcs producing iron... any news? Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 14:21:22 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Resent-Message-ID: <"rzDeL2.0.546.S7bAx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43180 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Hi Bill B, I recently purchased from Amazon.com the following book: Molecular Magnetism - New Magnetic Materials By Koichi Itoh and Minoru Kinoshita Pub. by Kodansha Tokyo & Gordon and Breach Science Publishers 347 pages, copyright 2000 Apparently hydrocarbon based ferromagnetic (but without iron) materials have been a very active area of research in Japan in recent years. The materials often include carbon ring structures and nitrogen. I have only read a small portion of the book, but it would appear to explain the generation of magnetic particles from carbon in an air arc. The air would supply water and nitrogen to allow formation of the magnetic hydrocarbons. It would appear to be necessary to analyze the magnetic particles from your pure carbon rods for iron content before claiming iron production. Regards, George Holz george varisys.com Varitronics Systems 1924 US Hwy 22 East Bound Brook, NJ 08805 From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Jun 15 11:39:42 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id LAA01116; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 11:38:42 -0700 Resent-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 11:38:42 -0700 Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20010615135806.028e8440 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 14:38:36 -0400 To: vortex-l eskimo.com, vortex-l@eskimo.com, From: Jed Rothwell Subject: Re: Other Hyrogen fuel In-Reply-To: <5.0.2.1.2.20010614181547.0294c418 pop.mindspring.com> References: <002101c0f537$7b3ee620$0845ccd1 asus> <031e01c0f2cb$71f5f040$e2b4bfa8 computer> <5.0.2.1.2.20010614162751.02947d28 pop.mindspring.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <"w14WR.0.HH.nObAx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43181 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Before Mike Carrell catches me, let me restate this. I wrote: There is enough wind energy at sea -- in the North Sea close to land, in water less than 50 meters deep -- to drive all the electric turbines in Northern Europe. But it would not be practical to generate ALL electricity from wind! In some parts of Northern Europe they generate about half from wind. That may be the practical limit. The problem is that heavy storms can disrupt the supply. Light winds are as much a problem, thanks to the power distribution network. Over an area hundreds of kilometers across, at a height of 50 meters above the sea or ground, the wind is always blowing somewhere. The solar energy has to go somewhere. Storms disrupt convention generators, mainly by blowing down power lines. In California, the Diablo Canyon nuclear power plant, that is cooled by ocean water, reduced power 20% in January when a storm tore kelp off the ocean floor, which clogged the cooling water inlet. Also in California, the 1120 MW San Onofre-3 plant had a serious accident on Feb. 3, 2001, which shut it down for three months. A circuit breaker in the turbine building caused a fire which burned for either 30 minutes or 3 hours, depending on which newspaper you believe. The reactor was scrammed (naturally). The fire damaged all three redundant oil pumps, which in turn "seriously damaged" the bearings and shaft on one turbine, or four turbines, depending on which newspaper you believe. - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Jun 15 12:37:59 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id MAA18144; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 12:36:51 -0700 Resent-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 12:36:51 -0700 Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20010615145912.0293cff0 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 15:00:38 -0400 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: Re: Other Hyrogen fuel In-Reply-To: <5.0.2.1.2.20010615135806.028e8440 pop.mindspring.com> References: <5.0.2.1.2.20010614181547.0294c418 pop.mindspring.com> <002101c0f537$7b3ee620$0845ccd1 asus> <031e01c0f2cb$71f5f040$e2b4bfa8 computer> <5.0.2.1.2.20010614162751.02947d28 pop.mindspring.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <"eJoMP.0.pQ4.GFcAx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43182 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: I wrote: "The problem is that heavy storms can disrupt the supply. Light winds are as much a problem, thanks to the power distribution network. . . ." Meant NOT as much of a problem. Particularly with good weather reporting. - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Jun 15 17:23:52 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id RAA03777; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 17:23:27 -0700 Resent-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 17:23:27 -0700 Message-ID: <3B2AA577.6D4AE8D enter.net> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 20:16:55 -0400 From: David Rosignoli X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Carbon-arcs producing iron... any news? References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"cvZCt.0.ww.-RgAx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43183 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Please tell us how it goes, for those of us who can't make it to the conference. ;-) William Beaty wrote: > > For the upcoming keelynet conference I'm going to demo the production of > magnetic particles in carbon arcs. This was discussed on vortex back > around early 1997 I believe, and a bit from Gene Mallove can be found at > http://www.amasci.com/freenrg/carbiron.txt. I was given some > spectrograph carbons (analysis ~2ppm silicon and manganese), and they make > "iron" bits just as readily as do the projector arc-lamp carbons. > > Has anyone heard any recent news about this? > > ((((((((((((((((((((( ( ( ( ( (O) ) ) ) ) ))))))))))))))))))))) > William J. Beaty SCIENCE HOBBYIST website > billb eskimo.com http://www.amasci.com > EE/programmer/sci-exhibits science projects, tesla, weird science > Seattle, WA 206-789-0775 freenrg-L taoshum-L vortex-L webhead-L From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Jun 15 17:50:00 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id RAA09807; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 17:49:08 -0700 Resent-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 17:49:08 -0700 Message-ID: <3B2AACE3.A759F41 ix.netcom.com> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 17:48:35 -0700 From: Akira Kawasaki X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en]C-CCK-MCD NSCPCD472 (Win95; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Vortex Subject: [Fwd: What's New for Jun 15, 2001] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"OUTUI2.0.5P2.3qgAx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43184 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: -------- Original Message -------- Subject: What's New for Jun 15, 2001 Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 16:32:58 -0400 (EDT) From: "What's New" To: aki ix.netcom.com WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 15 Jun 01 Washington, DC 1. HOLT BILL WOULD RESURRECT OTA! "ENOUGH ACADEMIC DISCUSSION." Ironically, after promising to reduce government, about the only agency terminated by the Republican Congress in 1995 was its own advisory body (WN 29 Sep 95). The Office of Technology Assessment was sacrificed to demonstrate that in downsizing the federal bureaucracy Congress would not exempt itself, but it was also symbolic of the low priority members of Congress accorded to objective scientific information. H.R. 2148, introduced today by Rep. Rush Holt (D-NJ), would authorize OTA at $20M, which is right where it was when it died. It comes at a time when major policy questions affecting the environment and national defense call for sound science advice. At the very highest level of government, however, there is no White House science advisor. 2. EVOLUTION: SENATE TACKS AMENDMENT ON MAJOR EDUCATION BILL. A "sense of the Senate" resolution, dealing with the teaching of biological evolution, was added to the bill. Introduced by Sen. Santorum (R-PA), the language raises concerns among scientists that it could be used by "intelligent design" (ID) proponents to insist that ID be given equal time. That does not seem to have been the intent of most of the measure's supporters. It states that students should be prepared to distinguish testable science from "philosophical or religious claims made in the name of science." That sounds good. Alas, the bill also calls for helping students "to understand why this subject generates so much continuing controversy." That's an opening to teach ID. 3. PASSIVE RADAR? REMOVING THE CLOAK OF INVISIBILITY. So just how stealthy is the $3.6B stealth bomber? Radar would need to look straight up at the bomber's flat bottom surface. Tracking would therefore require a vast array of antennas. But according to a story early this week in the London Daily Telegraph, such arrays already exist: Roke Manor Research in Britain claims that stealth aircraft can be tracked by their effect on ordinary mobile phone traffic. News media in the US did not discover the story until last night. The Pentagon is taking it seriously, and other nations, including China, are now developing such a system. 4. ASTROLOGICAL STUDIES? CLUELESS IN SEATTLE. I'm not making this up. The Higher Education Coordinating Board of the state of Washington has authorized Kepler College of Astrological Arts and Sciences in Seattle to issue BA and MA degrees in Astrological Studies. According to Kepler's web site, "No other degree- granting college or university in recent centuries has offered an academically sound approach to the study of astrology." I wonder why that is? Seattle, of course, is also the home of Bastyr University, a school of Naturopathy that "integrates modern science with the wisdom of ancient healing practices," and home of the Discovery Institute, http://www.discovery.org/. THE AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY (Note: Opinions are the author's, and are not necessarily shared by the APS, but they should be.) From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Jun 16 09:05:47 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id JAA23951; Sat, 16 Jun 2001 09:04:39 -0700 Resent-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 09:04:39 -0700 Message-ID: <000701c0f673$73e78ac0$98181ad8 oemcomputer> From: "Bruce Meland" To: Cc: "Matthew Rogers" , Subject: Re: Reply to Jeds mail (fwd) Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 07:48:46 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Resent-Message-ID: <"D1JkQ1.0.9s5.MEuAx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43185 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Dear Vortexians; I will be coming to Cincinnati, complements of Toyota next week for an unveiling of some of their technology and on the weekend going to visit revolutionary technology on the weekend in the general area including perhaps Jacks technology in Detroit, mentioned below, and if anyone with Voltage and amperage meters and electrical technical savy in the Cicninnati- Detroit area wants me to pick them up and go with me to get some information that Jed and Infinite Energy or others have been requesting- to see the proof of this advanced type technology- let me know right away. I think there is a Vortexian in the Dayton area that might want to come along and also perhaps a retired NASA Engineer. Sincerely Bruce Meland, editor Electrifying Times -----Original Message----- From: William Beaty To: vortex-l eskimo.com Date: Friday, June 15, 2001 1:11 AM Subject: Reply to Jeds mail (fwd) > >mail from a non-subscriber (below) > >((((((((((((((((((((( ( ( ( ( (O) ) ) ) ) ))))))))))))))))))))) >William J. Beaty SCIENCE HOBBYIST website >billb eskimo.com http://www.amasci.com >EE/programmer/sci-exhibits science projects, tesla, weird science >Seattle, WA 206-789-0775 freenrg-L taoshum-L vortex-L webhead-L > >---------- Forwarded message ---------- >Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 18:03:09 -0700 >From: JCarey9622 aol.com >To: etimes teleport.com, jedrothwell@infinite-energy.com, > vortex-l eskimo.com, beenergy@telusplanet.net >Subject: Reply to Jeds mail > >>From Jed Rothwell to the vortex group If they will demonstrate and sell >prototypes to me, I will bring them >>millions immediately, and billions in a few years. They would not even to >>sell me shares of the company; just license me to sell the machines. I am >>100% serious about this........ > >Reply From Jack Carey Confidential Technologies Flint Mi. An overall view. >To Jed I do not know who you are referring to. SIR Every thing I told >you was the truth. I will ask about the cost of the restart for Natural >Magnet Motor. Ken did see the unit and the material that produces the fields >that run it.. I hope someone else besides us has something we would like to >see it. It would make it easier on us. At this point Jed I do not think >anyone on this planet is on our level in regard to generating power that >actually does something usefull without consumption. I may be wrong. > > We are real bored as you are I assume with situations that do not make >coffee as Gene Mallove says. Also we are light years beyond TESLA. And anyone >can make cute toys. But if that is what you want instead of serious Tech. >that will power up this planet for the next few hundred years we will >obligee. Jed if you can bring Millions to the table it may be the time to >consider doing it. If you wait the chance will be gone. Please do not make >the same mistake that Gene is making. But that is your business. If your a >visionary in any way it may be time to use that ability or at least >investigate my claims first hand.. > >The inventor did reinvent and refine some of TESLA'S stuff 20 years ago. And >will do more. The timing is right this time to introduce it was not right >then. I have only been involved 2 years. As a promoter. Ken from Infinite >saw our stuff and did not understand it. Gene did not come and it appears >that he does not either. We stopped short on giving them any more Info. on >the obsolete 220 to 3 Phase that they think is revolutionary. We told them >how do make it until we were blue in the face and they still did not get it. >The mechanic that use to be a truck driver that came with the East coast >group Memorial Day weekend is not haveing a problem following instructions. >My guess is he is self taught and does not have a linear education standing >in his way that is stopping him from understanding how to recreate it. What >do you think?..Sir I'm not trying to be arrogant or presumptions or a smart >ass in any way. But those are the facts . > > If our more advanced Tech. works and can be sold to the public what is the >difference. We have 20 million Amish waiting for the 80 Amp true sine wave DC >to AC 220 V with a 100 Amp surge is that is self contained. They do not care >about verification from Infinite Energy or anybody else. At this point we do >not either. The 110 to 3 phase by itself could be a major product but we have >progressed far beyond it. It is not a toy and could bite hard if misused. >That is the main reason we will not market it by itself. > >If our advanced stuff Works as advertised we feel that is the key. Any >Negative or positive comment from you would be appreciated. That is the >point that I think they are missing at Infinite. With what has happened since >they came here. We do not need them anymore. They had there chance and they >blew it. It is there loss not ours. Gene is to arrogant for us Plus he is a >control type. We really liked Ken. Plus we will need a chemist in time and >he is very qualified. We shall see. Plus we were told by several people that >they would only use the 220 to 3 phase to get funding. > >Maybe you could see the chance of a lifetime. As the East coast Co. did that >is flying us out the week after the fourth. Our stuff is Not for sale. Just >licensing. Money or glory is not that important either. The money is nice to >have. I'm sending the flight info. that they sent us to possibly prove that >we are for real. The main goal is preserving our planet for our decedents. We >are not that important. We only think we are. We are destroying our >environment because of our greed and unwillingness to change. We feel It is >our duty to our grandchildren to do everything in our power to reverse that >process if we can. I have pontificated enough........ >> >>If a prototype machine can be fabricated for less than $10,000, so-called >>"deep pockets" are not called for, and in fact people with lots of money, >>power and influence would be more trouble than they are worth. Most major >>discoveries have succeeded without established financial backing. In fact, >>most required no outside investment capital until they matured into billion >>dollar industries. One of the perverse ideas popularized during the dot-com >>boom was that new ventures require hundreds of millions of dollars. A >>dot-com venture or the device described by Meland are both easily scaled >>from a handful of employees in a garage to thousands of employees. This >>kind of venture would not require more than $100,000 to launch. If the >>machine is real, I can and will launch it myself in a few weeks. > > Reply The larger the investment The higher the percentage of the return > >.> >> > Some of the name calling > > on this list is counterproductive and is >indicitative of low level >> > technicians. >> >>Nonsense. No one is "calling names." We are demanding substance instead of >>hot air. > >> A truce on this kind of activity would be in the best interest >> > of all concerned >> >>What does that mean? Mr. Meland want to publish imaginary claims without a >>shred of evidence, and he does not want anyone else to demand proof, or >>rigor, or even the names of the inventors! Whenever he is challenged to >>provide the smallest detail, he refuses. We are not allowed warn people >>that such claims typically published by scam artists trolling for victims. >>What Meland is doing is unethical, unscientific and contrary to the spirit >>and purpose of this mailing list. It would be in the best interests of >>everyone here if he would put up or shut up. If he is allowed to publish >>this kind of garbage indefinitely, he will degrade this mailing list until >>it is no better than the Keelynet. Already, several scientists have told me >>privately they are signing off. Jed > > REPLY Mr Meland has not seen our stuff but has talked to a Amish >physicist engineer that has been here. I agree about scam artists and big >money that wants to control. Big money that wants to make a difference is a >different story. We have run into the scam's to . The plasma fusion reactor >guy is one of them from what we can tell. We talked to him the other day. He >gives people that may really have something a bad name. But the fact is. Mr. >Meland is bound by confidentiality with us. He may have a real tiger by the >tail and I'm possibly one of those tails. The tiger is the inventor. There >may be others also I do not know at this point but will find out soon if >anyone else is on our level..As of yet we have not found anyone. But keep >looking and hopeing. > > He may be able to shut up anyone he wants to that thinks they know it all >real soon.. (We are the first ones to admit that we do not know it all.) We >will make sure of that if he wants to.. Because he has help us more than he >knows as Dr. Hal Fox has without asking for anything in return. I feel That >is the mark of a real gentlemen that wants to see positive changes happen in >our society. Jack Carey non technical spokes person.. > > Everybody take your best shot if you want to or come here and possibly >broaden your horizons as others have. It will be necessary to discard your >conventual knowledge about electricity first..Sorry things change and new >provable knowledge that can be physically demonstrated prevails. We will blow >a few accepted theories away for you if you decide to come as a bonus. And >replace them with news ones that actually work. Anybody Game. This is not a >perpetual motion claim so do not even go there. TESLA did a lot of it 100 >years ago so it is nothing new. Blame our worthless education system for not >teaching Tesla .And our Govt. for trying to suppress solutions. If our >system would encourage creative thinking instead of preaching conformity we >would not have all the environmental problems we do.. > > Excuse the length of this mail and my barley adequate and unscientific >writing abilities. Plus all the sub standard words I use. No body is >perfect. If my points are not clear call me. We will be coming out with >several diverse and radical new Technologies that may have profound effects. >He is looking for the answer to Zero time presently he feels the current >conclusion is a paradox. The speed of light theory does not work as it >stands. > > What has been accomplished is Einstein's quantum mechanics, the three fold >unified theory and string and super string theories has been combined into >one situation that actually works? A statement that bold should fire up >everybody. Be prepared to play hard ball if necessary if you talk to the >inventor. He can converse at the Ph.D. level and far beyond present day >knowledge in about 9 different areas of science. Put him to the test but be >prepared to be tested also. He has created new physics that will be published >in time.. Infinite Energy did not have a clue what he was talking about. > >Even linear educated Nobel prize winning physicists get lost after a few >minutes because they are trying to understand the process not the advanced >concept's.. Plus his inventions will fall apart in pieces or implode if you >try to reverse engineer them. That does not mean that no one can do it. If >you can reverse engineer our stuff we want to talk to you and have you join >our team if possible or a least make a deal with you. that will benefit both >party's. High end self taught Auto mechanics or promoters like me do not have >a problem with the concepts. He does not release the processes and will not >until they become obsolete like the 220 to 3 phase.. . > >DOW CORNING said he was a living version of Einstein and TESLA. Anybody >want to play. I'm not joking and I do not care if anyone believes the >statement.. I know it is the truth. In time the world will know it also. We >are looking forward to speaking with anyone that wants to make a positive >difference in our society. Two heads are better than one. No arrogant >attitude's on this end..Only Respect for anyone that contacts us. >810 744 9587 Home Page 810 812 4033 enter No. or Email He is only >available to talk Sat. afternoons and evenings. Except the first week of >July. He will be off then. Thank You for your time. >> > >> > > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Jun 16 09:10:43 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id JAA25199; Sat, 16 Jun 2001 09:10:15 -0700 Resent-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 09:10:15 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <5.0.2.1.2.20010614162751.02947d28 pop.mindspring.com> References: <031e01c0f2cb$71f5f040$e2b4bfa8 computer> <5.0.2.1.2.20010614162751.02947d28 pop.mindspring.com> Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 11:09:28 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: thomas malloy Subject: Re: Other Hyrogen fuel Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Resent-Message-ID: <"Jd6em2.0.Z96.cJuAx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43187 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: >It is kind of like generating energy from hog manure; by itself that >process would not economically competitive with fossil fuel, but >since the material has to be processed anyway, for other reasons, we >might as well derive energy as a byproduct. > >- Jed Sorry to be a wet blanket for this energy source Jed, but hog manure is more valuable as a soil amendment than as energy. OTOH, you could spread it on the ground and grow industrial hemp which you then burn for energy. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Jun 16 09:11:03 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id JAA25111; Sat, 16 Jun 2001 09:10:09 -0700 Resent-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 09:10:09 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 11:09:28 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: thomas malloy Subject: time dilation fields Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Resent-Message-ID: <"EqH8f2.0.G86.XJuAx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43186 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Since John Schnurer failed to see this posting I am reposting it. Fellow Vortexians; Last night Art Bell replayed an interview with Dr. David Anderson. of time travel associates. http://www.time-travel.com/ The doctor has a laboratory on Long Island in which he has created a plasma generator which produces a time dilation. According to him, a clock placed in the field will go 3 times as fast as a similar clock outside of it. The field is produced by intense magnetic fields interacting with a rotating electromagnetic field and a laser ring requiring 12 lasers. The lasers ionize the gas which opens the field. During the interview a young woman named Ann called in and asked him some very interesting questions, She wanted to know if he was using a Squid interface, he was not. She wanted to know how he was controlling the field, He replied that it was controlled by 6 injector sensor arrays. which had 43 data points from the 6 arrays which feed data into the control system. She wanted to know if he was experiencing residual field difusion. He replied that they were. He went on to say that when they retard the time field the field becomes unstable. The inner field becomes unstable and the field collapses. This spreading of the inner shell destroys biological organisms in the field. The control mechanism is based on the data collected by interferometers which feeds data into the control system. The biggest problem that they are having is modeling the field. Ann started questioning him about fuzzy logic and some other mathematical modeling system, but Art cut her off. That's what I hate most about Art, is his cutting callers off. During the February interview ( when it was run live ) I heard this caller and I am pleased to be able to share this interaction with you all. What follows was in the first part of the interview. Once the field is established the amount of energy required to maintain it decreases. The reason for this is not understood. The plasma surrounding the field produces a doppler effect which distorts the color of the object in the field until it turns black. During the mathematical theorizing about this, the doctor solved the problem of satellite's failure to be where they were predicted to be. I don't know if this explains the present position of the Voyager's or not. The doctor's theorizing accounts for frame dragging which I would assume would only apply in the vicinity of a planet. Frame dragging is the distortion in space which occurs in the vicinity of a planetary body as a result of it's rotation. The magnetic field of the planet contributes to this effect too. I've been looking for an explanation of frame dragging. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Jun 16 10:42:18 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id KAA17347; Sat, 16 Jun 2001 10:41:32 -0700 Resent-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 10:41:32 -0700 Message-ID: <001401c0f680$fe4119e0$da181ad8 oemcomputer> From: "Bruce Meland" To: Cc: Subject: Re: Other Hyrogen fuel Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 09:25:42 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Resent-Message-ID: <"7YnNc1.0.uE4.CfvAx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43188 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Hey Jed Parks; since when are you the authority in most energy issues and debunking technology that you know nothing or very little about?. Yes you sound like Parks most of the time. Listen to this; Bernie Faber an Oregon Dairyman is conducting a pilot plant operation in cooperation with Portland General Electric to produce electricity from dairy cow manure. PGE has installed a 125 KW generator on the faber farm that will convert methane gas to electricity to power about 60 homes. year around, near Salem Oregon . The 450 cow heard manure will be pumped into a waste concrete waste digester approx 30 feet in diameter and 25 ft high. Proof of the pudding is a pilot plant. Bruce -----Original Message----- From: thomas malloy To: vortex-l eskimo.com Date: Saturday, June 16, 2001 9:10 AM Subject: Re: Other Hyrogen fuel >>It is kind of like generating energy from hog manure; by itself that >>process would not economically competitive with fossil fuel, but >>since the material has to be processed anyway, for other reasons, we >>might as well derive energy as a byproduct. >> >>- Jed > >Sorry to be a wet blanket for this energy source Jed, but hog manure >is more valuable as a soil amendment than as energy. OTOH, you could >spread it on the ground and grow industrial hemp which you then burn >for energy. > > > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Jun 16 11:11:24 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id LAA24411; Sat, 16 Jun 2001 11:10:50 -0700 Resent-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 11:10:50 -0700 Message-ID: <002e01c0f685$152fa0a0$69181ad8 oemcomputer> From: "Bruce Meland" To: Cc: Subject: Re: Mercury Arc Space Drive? Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 09:54:58 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Resent-Message-ID: <"-WMNG.0.Lz5.g4wAx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43189 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Hi Keith: Are you from the Cincinnati-Detroit area or know of someone that can go with me to take some measurments of these outrageous claims? Toyota will be flying me to Cincinnati for a launch and willl spend the weekend going to Detroit to take some measurments and talk to one of a few wizzards I have been refering to. Bruce -----Original Message----- From: Keith Nagel To: vortex-l eskimo.com Date: Sunday, June 10, 2001 9:45 PM Subject: RE: Mercury Arc Space Drive? >Hi Fred. > >OK, I've done my share of experimenting with mercury >ignitrons. Is this something like what you have in mind? >I'll say, when you push a 1000 amps or so thru one >they make quite a pop, but I haven't seen one take >off yet. Any suggestions for testing here? I happen to >have one with all the driver circuitry set up, so >go ahead... > >K. > >-----Original Message----- >From: Frederick Sparber [mailto:fjsparber earthlink.net] >Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2001 5:47 AM >To: vortex-l eskimo.com >Cc: jlsparber earthlink.net >Subject: Re: Mercury Arc Space Drive? > > >Just in case experiment for unsure skeptics: > >Use two ~1/4 inch diameter tungsten welding rods tightly inserted in a >quartz or >ceramic tube (~1.0 mm gap) with a small drop of Hg or Cs contacting them in >the gap , >so that the drop vaporizes when the voltage (24 volts D.C.) is applied with >the >negative side up. > >If it levitates... :-) > >Regards, Frederick > > > > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Jun 16 12:04:10 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id MAA04554; Sat, 16 Jun 2001 12:03:46 -0700 Resent-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 12:03:46 -0700 Message-ID: <008401c0f68c$7a9037a0$69181ad8 oemcomputer> From: "Bruce Meland" To: Subject: Re: Amplify? Re:Clean advanced propulsion technologies Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 10:09:58 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Resent-Message-ID: <"prKQS2.0.371.HswAx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43190 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Hi John; Live E W N S of Dayton? Bruce -----Original Message----- From: John Schnurer To: Bruce Meland Cc: vortex-l eskimo.com Date: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 12:57 PM Subject: Re: Amplify? Re:Clean advanced propulsion technologies > > > > Dear Bruce, > > > I am 20 miles from Dayton, 55 from Columbus. > > > John > >On Tue, 15 May 2001, Bruce Meland wrote: > >> Hi John Confidential inquiryl How far do you live from Wooster Ohio? A Tesla >> Guy lives there. Thats where the BH are flying. I forwarded Erics offer. he >> has all kinds of devices. All is mail is intercepted. I have to go through a >> 3rd party to communicate. You live near Dayton right? >> >> > >> > >> > >> > I have had enjoyment building Tesla tuned transformers and some of >> >his resonant circuits. We did not have a good grasp on the neutron until >> >1932. The "baby neutron" or "tiny neutron" or "little neutron" to use the >> >humor of the particle physics of the time comes from Enrico Fermi.... >> >and he and his peers keep the tradition alive. >> > >> >> I am an experimentalist and as such revel in a technical puzzle. >> > >> > >> > > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Jun 16 12:35:04 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id MAA11163; Sat, 16 Jun 2001 12:34:22 -0700 Resent-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 12:34:22 -0700 Message-ID: <008c01c0f690$bf97e420$69181ad8 oemcomputer> From: "Bruce Meland" To: Cc: Subject: Fw: Reply to Jed from Jack Carey Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 11:18:29 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Resent-Message-ID: <"Eqcoo1.0.Lk2.zIxAx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43191 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: -Date: Saturday, June 16, 2001 10:04 AM Subject: Reply to Jed from Jack Carey >Yesterday someone named Jack Carey called me on the telephone, and I see he >has now published a message here on Vortex. He is one of the people Bruce >Meland has referred to. He makes many extravagant and unbelievable claims. >Let me report a few of them here. What he told me does not square with what >he has told other people, and he kept changing the story. His descriptions >are difficult to sort out because he mixes up power and energy, as well as >watts, amps, volts, radiation and magnetism. > > REPLY > > >Please bear with me as I go through this so it is possibly clear to >everyone. We have different technologies. Some create power/energy by >themselves. Some step up power from the grid. I will only cover a few of them >at this time. If anyone understands physics on the nuclear level a colleague >has invented a new very advanced Tech. also but I will not go into that now >I will try to be specific on just a couple of situations and be as clear as I >can. > > First.. Natural Magnetism creates power by itself. (Not Electro) It is a >different World. You have nothing to compare it with. The Motor can be >restarted if you want to fund. We are vastly improving the next model. It >Will cost 20 Million to refine. And about 3 years. This Tech. will make it >possible for everything to have its own power source and be portable. We will >obtain money from a minor invention to accomplish that goal. It will also >create power by itself but is not as advanced and does not have as many >applications as Natural Magnetism. > > Power source may be small lead acid batteries that require recharging by our >proposed 80 Amp. true sine wave DC To AC unit while it is running or a new >proposed hydrogen battery that would provide power and not need to be >recharged or maybe something else someone has that we have seen a film of >that we may be able to take to the next step and make it viable as a power >source. Lead acid is only 92% efficient and would require some external >charging once in a while. We want 100%. This unit will basically replace >power Co. as provider of power. And provide power through your existing >wiring. It can be installed outside. It will require no fossil fuels. And it >will be safe and far more cost effective than present delivery systems. > >. I'm sorry we will not tell you or anyone else how it actually works >internally. We have made up something for the international patent so it >would be a nightmare to try and reproduce. Plus only part of the Info. will >be in the patent. Plus the unit will come apart in many sealed pieces if you >try to open it. Have fun trying to figure out how to reassemble Because it >will be designed not to work if opened.. If you try to open the sealed >pieces inside they are designed not function if you try to screw with them. >You are welcome to try. Good luck. If you figure it out we will come out with >a more advanced Tech. that will make it obsolete. Let me know if I have >missed anything in my effort to stop anyone from reproducing our inventions. > > Currently we only demo. a single phase to 3 phase unit. It is also designed >not to function if you screw with it. It uses 2.4 Amps AC from 110 and under >load uses 9 Amps from 110 . To create about 15 Hp. of work. As far as we know >this is not Presently possible as far as science knows. Am I talking about >new physics here. Could that be possible? And a linear educated person did >not invent it. Could this be the end of the world or the beginning of a new >world because our education system fail us as usual? And most of our current >electrical knowledge may be worthless. > > To be specific can you run a a large 5 Hp. gas station style air >compressor to 160 PSI. that now has a 3 Hp. motor on it and only requires 400 >Watts of power to operate and the 3 phase motor never gets any warmer than 10 >Deg. above room Temp. Also A 6 Foot high Ind. Drill press that only has a 1 >Hp. motor instead of a 2 1/2 plus a 100 Amp arch welder all at the same time >with a Max draw from 110 of 9 Amps. Because we can. If this is possible can >anyone explain it. This could be a product but we have bigger fish to fry. > > This was showed to Ken from Infinite energy but it was beyond his >understanding. Jed if your open minded That is a plus. Ken was not. Come and >take a look for yourself because your not going to believe anything anyone >tells you unless you do. And if I was you I would not either. If I send you a >tape or you look at the one Gene Mallove has you probably not going to >believe it anyway. Seeing is possibly believing. If it works and money can be >made off of it what is the difference if you can understand it or not. I >tried to explain it to you but it was not getting thru So I gave up.... I >tried cover to many new Technologies at one time ....If you come here Your >linear education will probably not help you to explain our inventions. What >ever experience you have had since then might. ............ Please do not >rely on your TECHNICAL education because most of it will be proven wrong. > >. We do not care if you come or not. But you are welcome. Come next weekend >if you want to when Bruce Meland will be here to verify or disprove our >claims.. We already have deals on the stove with other companies that are >cooking because they believe we are for real but we are willing to talk if >you want to proceed after your convinced we are as advertised. No NDA is >necessary to see Demo's. We are very open. Because we have nothing to hide. >Call Ken at Infinite ask him what he saw. We made the mistake of showing him >to much. Maybe cold fusion will work someday. We can make it work but we want >our stuff out there first. If you want to come I will have the inventor >sort out the rest of your mail to me then. > > Plus I would like to discuss the rest of the mail with you in person on tape >so every detail is perfectly clear and can be sent to everyone in vortex for >there review. Because some of the things your saying are not exactly right. >Bring Mallove to . I want him on tape to. That way these discussions will be >settled one way or another. I want to nail you boys to the cross thank you >for giving me the opportunity to do it in this forum in front of your peers.. >Now what are going to say or do. You were easy to set up. You did not see it >coming did you. Now is your turn to put up or shut up like you said to Bruce >Meland. > > Come take your lumps and then lets get down to the business of saving this >planet we need to work together. Once you accept the fact We have the >technology to make it happen. It will be easy. And you and Gene can profit >from it. How can you lose. It is up to you. If you were not involved with >the Magazine I would not have went as far as I did. Time is running out >for you guys to get involved. Frankly, I do not like Gene personally because >I think he is arrogant and he does not like me either. But business is >business . Bruce Please Post > >First, he has a device which supposedly inputs 990 watts single phase AC >and outputs 11,250 watts 3-phase AC, yet for some reason, it cannot be run >in a self-sustaining mode. I tried several times to explain what that >means, and Carey gave me quite a long song-and-dance response. The gist of >it is, they are planning to make it self-sustain, and they hope to do it >soon, but the task will require $20 million. > >Second, he already has a self-sustaining device, a smaller version the size >of a shoebox. He has not mentioned this machine to other people who have >visited him and spoken with him recently; I do not know why he chose to >reveal it to me, but since I am not under any kind of Non Disclosure >Agreement (NDA) I suppose there is no harm in reporting it here. This >machine worked in a self-sustaining mode either 10, 15 or 20 years ago, >depending on which version of the story he tells. I asked whether the >machine still exists, and why it cannot be turned on again. He said the >machine is perfectly intact, but it is dangerous, it emits magnetic fields >that will "mess up your DNA" if you stand closer than 30 feet away from the >machine. I said, "in that case why don't you run it in a location 30 feet >away from anyone?" He said you have to stand directly over the machine when >you start it up. I asked "How do you start it? Why can't that be done from >a distance? It took me several minutes to explain what I had in mind. Here >is a sample of the exchange, to the best of my memory: > >Me:"Why not power it up with a 30 foot long wire?" > >JC: "It doesn't start with electricity." > >Me: "Then how does it start, with a rope or a lanyard, like a lawn mower?" > >JC: "No, you put the magnetism into the thing. When you assemble it, it >starts up." >Me: "What precisely do you mean? What do you do with your hand that makes >the thing go?" > >JC: "You assemble it." > >Me: "I guess you mean put the top on, or screw the equipment case shut. So >why can't you perform the last step of assembly from a safe distance away?" > >JC: "You mean with a robot? That would take tons of money! 20 million!" > >Me: "I hardly think so . . . Just the last stage of putting the case >together . . ." > >JC: "We just can't control the thing." > >Me: "But you told me earlier you ran it for years, sometimes continuously >for months at a time. And it is still in perfect repair, left just as it >was the last time you demonstrated it to the people from Corning. You were >able to control it all those years, why can't you control it now?" > >JC: "We need to develop a new one, for $20 million, with a plastic shell to >prevent the 20 megacycle magnetism from hurting your DNA." > >Me: "That's fascinating, but if plastic will do the job, why not devise a >plastic case for the old machine?" > >JC: "I'll get back to you on that." > >This will give the reader a sense of how difficult it is communicate with >Mr. Carey. Apparently, although they ran the machine many times over a >period of years, they never devised a simple way to turn it on and off. > >Finally, he described a third device. They are a few weeks away from >developing a cigarette lighter that generates Brown's Gas from a watch >battery and runs on water. I said I would like to buy a dozen of those >things, at any price he cares to name. He said they will not be for sale. I >asked what is the point of having all these wonderful gadgets if they are >not for sale. He said he would get back to me with a price, but in the >meanwhile would I be interested in investing. I said no. > >In his message to posted here, Carey repeats some of these claims. He says: >"And anyone can make cute toys." I asked him to make a small, self >sustaining version his device, but he said no, they will only make huge >ones, large enough for a house or a neighborhood. As far as I know, nobody >has ever made a "cute toy" that does the things he describes. Naturally, as >far as I know this is utterly impossible, but I would be willing to go look >at one after seeing a video of a "cute toy" in operation. > >Carey hopes to prevent all of his customers from reverse engineering the >product. I mentioned that the U.L. and all government and state regulatory >agencies demand a complete description of the product and working models -- >in essence they demand that you reverse engineer it for them, and tell the >world every detail of every machine sold in the U.S. He did not believe >this, or he discounted it, insisting that he will be allowed to sell to >"Amish" people. All of the Amish people I have encountered live in >Pennsylvania, which has a strong regulatory and consumer protection >agencies, and Amish people are generally prudent, law abiding folks who >will not risk their health or fire insurance with untested, uncertified, >revolutionary technology. I personally would not *think* of bringing a >large, mysterious, energy-generating machine anywhere near my house until >it had been tested exhaustively for years by government and private >agencies, including exposure to lab rats and primates. I doubt that Carey >will find many people willing to do this, and I am quite sure he cannot >prevent people from reverse engineering these machines. Any attempt to do >so is a futile waste of time, and any business plan that depends upon >finding customers who will not reverse engineer is doomed. > >Carey writes: "Jed if you can bring Millions to the table it may be the >time to consider doing it." No, it will be the time when Carey or someone >else in his organization makes a coherent case for doing so, when they give >me some credible evidence the machine(s) actually exist, and they describe >a plan which might generate a profit. > >He writes: "The inventor did reinvent and refine some of TESLA'S stuff 20 >years ago." I do not believe that Tesla himself, or anyone else, ever built >any of the machines he describe. I think all of these claims are hogwash. I >will not be persuaded otherwise by words or bold claims made by scientific >illiterates such as Carey. If he wishes to persuade me -- or anyone else -- >he will have to provide actual evidence, including a description of the >device, test data, and a video. > >I mentioned that most major discoveries have succeeded without established >financial backing. Carey replies: "The larger the investment The higher the >percentage of the return." This answer makes no sense whatsoever. The >largest private fortune in the world, belonging to Bill Gates, began with >an "investment" of two meters of paper tape. No other outside investment >was ever required; Microsoft could have been purely self-financing, but it >grew so large that some of the stockholders and the SEC asked Gates to take >it public. The second largest private fortune, belonging to the Ford >family, was self-financed from 1903 until Ford went public in 1956. The >size of the initial investment in a venture of this nature has absolutely >nothing to do with the eventual return, except in old-line, high capital, >established industries, mining and the like. > >Carey modestly describes his own role: > > Jack Carey non technical spokes person.. > >That hardly does justice. Despite this non technical role, he speaks: > > What has been accomplished is Einstein's quantum mechanics, the > three fold unified theory and string and super string theories > has been combined into one situation that actually works? A > statement that bold should fire up everybody. > >Indeed, I am so fired up I can barely breath. Unfortunately, I have no clue >what this might mean, and I suspect it means absolutely nothing. In any >case, Carey does not understand some basic mechanics and simple concepts >about energy and electricity, so I doubt he understands quantum mechanics >or string theory. He is, at best, parroting someone else. If he or that >other person wishes to convince anyone outside of their circle, they should >start with me, because I am more open minded than a typical university >professor. All they have to do is present simple, credible, experimental >evidence. The string theory can stay in the box. > >- Jed > > > >----------------------- Headers -------------------------------- >Return-Path: >Received: from rly-yd02.mx.aol.com (rly-yd02.mail.aol.com [172.18.150.2]) by >air-yd05.mail.aol.com (v78_r3.8) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 13:14:15 -0400 >Received: from hall.mail.mindspring.net (hall.mail.mindspring.net >[207.69.200.60]) by rly-yd02.mx.aol.com (v78_r3.8) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Jun >2001 13:13:29 -0400 >Received: from infinite-energy.infinite-energy.com >(user-vcauhnh.dsl.mindspring.com > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Jun 16 12:49:33 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id MAA14171; Sat, 16 Jun 2001 12:48:56 -0700 Resent-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 12:48:56 -0700 From: Keasy aol.com Message-ID: <75.164f0922.285d11fe aol.com> Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 15:48:14 EDT Subject: Re: Other Hyrogen fuel To: vortex-l eskimo.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 5.0 for Windows sub 139 Resent-Message-ID: <"dquWT.0.FT3.eWxAx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43192 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: In a message dated 6/16/01 10:42:16 AM Pacific Daylight Time, etimes teleport.com writes: > Hey Jed Parks; since when are you the authority in most energy issues and > debunking technology that you know nothing or very little about?. Yes you > sound like Parks most of the time. Listen to this; Bernie Faber an Oregon > Dairyman is conducting a pilot plant operation in cooperation with Portland > General Electric to produce electricity from dairy cow manure. PGE has > installed a 125 KW generator on the faber farm that will convert methane gas > to electricity to power about 60 homes. year around, near Salem Oregon . The > 450 cow heard manure will be pumped into a waste concrete waste digester > approx 30 feet in diameter and 25 ft high. Proof of the pudding is > Uh, is "pudding" the best term to be using here --- ? Ken From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Jun 16 13:50:48 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id NAA28517; Sat, 16 Jun 2001 13:49:37 -0700 Resent-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 13:49:37 -0700 Message-ID: <002701c0f69b$41e27da0$ab181ad8 oemcomputer> From: "Bruce Meland" To: Subject: Re: Fw: Dr. Chung's Negative Resistance Replicated Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 12:33:43 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Resent-Message-ID: <"i50Fd2.0.Tz6.XPyAx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43193 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: I hope that was a sarcastic remark. -----Original Message----- From: Rick Monteverde To: vortex-l eskimo.com Date: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 12:38 PM Subject: Re: Fw: Dr. Chung's Negative Resistance Replicated >Bruce - > >You do know that this isn't any kind of vacuum coherer or potential >energy source, don't you? Even JLN and others on that list are clear >on that. > >- Rick Monteverde >Honolulu, HI > > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Jun 16 14:00:52 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id OAA31753; Sat, 16 Jun 2001 14:00:23 -0700 Resent-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 14:00:23 -0700 Message-ID: <004b01c0f69c$c4967660$ab181ad8 oemcomputer> From: "Bruce Meland" To: Cc: Subject: Re: Other Hyrogen fuel Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 12:44:31 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Resent-Message-ID: <"s8Bgs1.0._l7.cZyAx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43194 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Maybe proof of the bull shit would be better -----Original Message----- From: Keasy aol.com To: vortex-l eskimo.com Date: Saturday, June 16, 2001 12:49 PM Subject: Re: Other Hyrogen fuel >In a message dated 6/16/01 10:42:16 AM Pacific Daylight Time, >etimes teleport.com writes: > >> Hey Jed Parks; since when are you the authority in most energy issues and >> debunking technology that you know nothing or very little about?. Yes you >> sound like Parks most of the time. Listen to this; Bernie Faber an Oregon >> Dairyman is conducting a pilot plant operation in cooperation with Portland >> General Electric to produce electricity from dairy cow manure. PGE has >> installed a 125 KW generator on the faber farm that will convert methane >gas >> to electricity to power about 60 homes. year around, near Salem Oregon . >The >> 450 cow heard manure will be pumped into a waste concrete waste digester >> approx 30 feet in diameter and 25 ft high. Proof of the pudding is > > > Uh, is "pudding" the best term to be using here --- ? > > Ken > > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Jun 16 14:45:06 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id OAA11227; Sat, 16 Jun 2001 14:44:20 -0700 Resent-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 14:44:20 -0700 From: "R. Wormus" To: vortex-l eskimo.com Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 15:41:47 -0600 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <002701c0f69b$41e27da0$ab181ad8 oemcomputer> X-Mailer: YAM 2.2 [060] AmigaOS E-Mail Client (c) 1995-2000 by Marcel Beck http://www.yam.ch Subject: Re: Dr. Chung's Negative Resistance Replicated MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Resent-Message-ID: <"lPZXe1.0.Kl2.pCzAx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43195 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Bruce, No, it is a fact. Read the info. at JLN's site. Ron On 16-Jun-01, Bruce Meland etimes teleport.com wrote: BM> I hope that was a sarcastic remark. BM> -----Original Message----- BM> From: Rick Monteverde BM> To: vortex-l eskimo.com BM> Date: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 12:38 PM BM> Subject: Re: Fw: Dr. Chung's Negative Resistance Replicated BM> BM> BM>> Bruce - BM>> BM>> You do know that this isn't any kind of vacuum coherer or potential BM>> energy source, don't you? Even JLN and others on that list are clear BM>> on that. BM>> BM>> - Rick Monteverde BM>> Honolulu, HI BM>> BM>> BM> -- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Jun 16 21:38:17 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id VAA19225; Sat, 16 Jun 2001 21:37:15 -0700 Resent-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 21:37:15 -0700 Reply-To: From: "Keith Nagel" To: Cc: Subject: RE: Mercury Arc Space Drive? Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 00:43:15 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 In-Reply-To: <002e01c0f685$152fa0a0$69181ad8 oemcomputer> Importance: Normal Resent-Message-ID: <"Kq9TV.0.Ji4.xF3Bx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43196 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Hello Bruce. No, I don't live anywhere near there. Thanks for the offer though. But perhaps what is more to the point, is that so far no tangible information has been presented concerning your inventors claims. Other than the phrase, "First.. Natural Magnetism creates power by itself. (Not Electro)" Sadly, I'm not trained as an auto mechanic, and so find the above theory quite opaque. I can forward it to an auto mechanic friend of mine, but SOMEHOW I have the feeling that he'd be equally baffled. Perhaps due to our linear education? By the way, just what IS a linear education? I try to keep an open mind. But frankly the more information I read from your contact, the less possible any of this appears. Oh yes, and the part about selling some hyper advanced technology to the Amish strikes me as truly bizarre. I mean, you do realize that the Amish drive around in horse drawn buggies, right? These people aren't what one might call early adopters... I think the phrase Luddite might be more appropriate. Also, your contact seems to have gone to great lengths to ensure his machines don't work. You may insert conclusion here, gentle reader. K. PS: Please post stuff about this to a seperate thread, none of this has anything to do with the mercury arc tests Fred, Frank, and I are contemplating. -----Original Message----- From: Bruce Meland [mailto:etimes teleport.com] Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2001 12:55 PM To: knagel gis.net Cc: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Mercury Arc Space Drive? Hi Keith: Are you from the Cincinnati-Detroit area or know of someone that can go with me to take some measurments of these outrageous claims? Toyota will be flying me to Cincinnati for a launch and willl spend the weekend going to Detroit to take some measurments and talk to one of a few wizzards I have been refering to. Bruce -----Original Message----- From: Keith Nagel To: vortex-l eskimo.com Date: Sunday, June 10, 2001 9:45 PM Subject: RE: Mercury Arc Space Drive? >Hi Fred. > >OK, I've done my share of experimenting with mercury >ignitrons. Is this something like what you have in mind? >I'll say, when you push a 1000 amps or so thru one >they make quite a pop, but I haven't seen one take >off yet. Any suggestions for testing here? I happen to >have one with all the driver circuitry set up, so >go ahead... > >K. > >-----Original Message----- >From: Frederick Sparber [mailto:fjsparber earthlink.net] >Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2001 5:47 AM >To: vortex-l eskimo.com >Cc: jlsparber earthlink.net >Subject: Re: Mercury Arc Space Drive? > > >Just in case experiment for unsure skeptics: > >Use two ~1/4 inch diameter tungsten welding rods tightly inserted in a >quartz or >ceramic tube (~1.0 mm gap) with a small drop of Hg or Cs contacting them in >the gap , >so that the drop vaporizes when the voltage (24 volts D.C.) is applied with >the >negative side up. > >If it levitates... :-) > >Regards, Frederick > > > > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Jun 17 12:08:54 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id MAA12759; Sun, 17 Jun 2001 12:08:13 -0700 Resent-Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 12:08:13 -0700 Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20010617145918.00a8f650 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 15:01:26 -0400 To: vortex-l eskimo.com, vortex-l@eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: Re: Other Hyrogen fuel In-Reply-To: References: <5.0.2.1.2.20010614162751.02947d28 pop.mindspring.com> <031e01c0f2cb$71f5f040$e2b4bfa8 computer> <5.0.2.1.2.20010614162751.02947d28 pop.mindspring.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <"xjjTo.0.C73.T0GBx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43198 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: thomas malloy wrote: >Sorry to be a wet blanket for this energy source Jed, but hog manure is >more valuable as a soil amendment than as energy. OTOH, you could spread >it on the ground and grow industrial hemp which you then burn for energy. You can use it for both. First extract the methane, then use the leftovers for fertilizer. In the U.S., industrial hemp production is widely prohibited because of anti-marijuana laws. That's a darn shame. - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Jun 17 12:08:54 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id MAA12793; Sun, 17 Jun 2001 12:08:21 -0700 Resent-Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 12:08:21 -0700 Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20010617150144.0293e0f8 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 15:08:13 -0400 To: vortex-l eskimo.com, From: Jed Rothwell Subject: Re: Other Hyrogen fuel In-Reply-To: <001401c0f680$fe4119e0$da181ad8 oemcomputer> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <"vuY3U2.0.B73.T0GBx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43197 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Bruce Meland wrote: >Hey Jed Parks; since when are you the authority in most energy issues and >debunking technology that you know nothing or very little about? I have not "debunked" anything here lately. I merely reported my exchange with Jack Carey in detail, quoting him verbatim as closely as I can remember. His claims sound impossible to me, but they sound impossible to anyone with any knowledge of basic science. It is not "debunking" to point that out, or to point out that he did not give me any quantitative data, experiment description, photographs, or anything else that a normal person would provide as proof of a claim. He has effectively debunked himself. Perhaps he will understand this and come through with some data. I would be happy to look at it. >Yes you sound like Parks most of the time. Parks is a hot dog and sausage company. You probably mean Robert Park, of the APS. He does not resemble a hot dog and I do not resemble him. > Listen to this; Bernie Faber an Oregon >Dairyman is conducting a pilot plant operation in cooperation with Portland >General Electric to produce electricity from dairy cow manure. Yes, I am well aware of this and many similar projects. - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Jun 17 12:23:25 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id MAA17603; Sun, 17 Jun 2001 12:22:08 -0700 Resent-Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 12:22:08 -0700 Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20010617151026.00a8f650 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 15:22:08 -0400 To: vortex-L eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: Amish not luddites In-Reply-To: References: <002e01c0f685$152fa0a0$69181ad8 oemcomputer> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <"KYM--2.0.zI4.WDGBx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43199 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Keith Nagel wrote: >Oh yes, and the part about selling some hyper advanced >technology to the Amish strikes me as truly bizarre. >I mean, you do realize that the Amish drive around in >horse drawn buggies, right? These people aren't what >one might call early adopters... No, they are not. They are 50 to 300 years behind the times in some ways. Some of them consider buttons too decorative for clothing. > I think the phrase >Luddite might be more appropriate. I disagree. I have not had many dealings with them, but a childhood friend of mine used to spend his summers working with them, and they live not far from my property in Pennsylvania. I do not think it is fair to call them luddites. I would not want to join the Amish, and I do not care for their attitudes toward education, but I have great respect for their views about technology. They adapt inventions which enhance their community values, such as off-grid electricity, indoor plumbing, modern medicine, refrigeration for diary farms and Cheerios breakfast cereal. They try out many new technologies, and sometimes reject them years later, or modify them in clever ways to avoid a negative impact on society (both theirs and ours). In the 1920s many of them used automobiles but later decided that in most case most people should not have them. They make reasonable, humane exceptions to their rules. They do not withdraw from the rest of society or refuse to participate. They are quite different from extremist fanatics on both ends of the spectrum. - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Jun 17 13:13:23 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id NAA30861; Sun, 17 Jun 2001 13:12:52 -0700 Resent-Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 13:12:52 -0700 Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20010617160954.0293e0f8 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 16:12:51 -0400 To: vortex-l eskimo.com, JCarey9622@aol.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: Re: Fw: Reply to Jed from Jack Carey In-Reply-To: <008c01c0f690$bf97e420$69181ad8 oemcomputer> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <"8A3Ud1.0.7Y7.3zGBx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43200 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Jack Carey effectively debunked himself here, with a long message relayed by Bruce Meland. As far as I can tell, the "technical" parts of the message make no sense whatever. To the best of my knowledge statements like "Natural Magnetism creates power by itself. (Not Electro)" are meaningless nonsense. I will not address this nonsense, but I will correct a few of his other peculiar notions: >Please bear with me as I go through this so it is possibly clear to >everyone. We have different technologies. Some create power/energy by >themselves. Some step up power from the grid. Carey does not mean the devices "step up" power in the normal sense of changing voltage; he means they actually output more power (watts) than they input. Obviously any machine that does that is creating power/energy by itself, and can be used in a self-sustaining, stand-alone mode. The distinction he claims here has no meaning. I do not know whether Carey is a scam artist or not, but most scam artists make this same nonsensical distinction. This is a warning flag. > It is a >different World. You have nothing to compare it with. The Motor can be >restarted if you want to fund. This contradicts Carey's earlier statements on the telephone to me. He said the device is perfectly intact, the same as it was when it was last used some time ago, either 10, 15 or 20 years ago, depending on which version of his story he feels like telling. >. I'm sorry we will not tell you or anyone else how it actually works >internally. We have made up something for the international patent so it >would be a nightmare to try and reproduce. This patent would be rejected. A patent must include complete, up-to-date knowledge, and a "person skilled in the art" must be able to replicate the device from the patent. You are not allowed to deliberately obfuscate or hide knowledge. When you fill in a patent application, you must swear sign a Declaration under penalty of perjury that you are not hiding relevant information. If Carey et al. really do plan to commit a crime, they are so ignorant of the patent laws, they have told me about it and permitted Meland to broadcast their intentions to the world at large. > Plus only part of the Info. will >be in the patent. The patent must be complete in all respects, or it will be ruled invalid and the information in it will go into the public domain. > Plus the unit will come apart in many sealed pieces if you >try to open it. Have fun trying to figure out how to reassemble Because it >will be designed not to work if opened.. You would never be allowed to sell this machine in North America, Europe or Japan for commercial or consumer use. Health and safety laws would forbid it. You must file a complete list of all components and an up-to-date blueprint of the machine and its operating characteristics with various government agencies and the UL. >Let me know if I have >missed anything in my effort to stop anyone from reproducing our inventions. You are missing all common sense, as well as a high school level knowledge patent law, government, regulations and insurance. If you present this as a "business plan" to an "investor" with an education above 7th grade, you will be instantly dismissed. No sane businessman would consider investing in this scheme, because it is illegal and unworkable. >. We do not care if you come or not. But you are welcome. Come next weekend >if you want to when Bruce Meland will be here to verify or disprove our >claims.. Based on the descriptions by Carey and Ken Rouen, it would be impossible for me or anyone else to determine whether the device is doing anything in the "demonstration" they have arranged. It would be a waste of time to view this demo. On the other hand, if the device works the way they claim, they could arrange a real demonstration in a few days at no expense. >you want to proceed after your convinced we are as advertised. No NDA is >necessary to see Demo's. We are very open. Because we have nothing to hide. This contradicts the earlier statements that they will make the machine impossible to open, and they plan to commit perjury on their patent application. >Call Ken at Infinite ask him what he saw. We made the mistake of showing him >to much. I did ask Ken. I gather it was "to much" yet not enough. Maybe cold fusion will work someday. We can make it work but we want >our stuff out there first. Ah, this is really is "to much!" These people are better scientists than Fleischmann, Storms, Oriani or Mizuno. > Plus I would like to discuss the rest of the mail with you in person on tape >so every detail is perfectly clear . . . That would be an excellent idea. No need to discuss anything, just provide an ordinary, work-a-day description of an experiment, with a list of instruments, inputs, outputs, graphs and so on. If you yourself write it, I suggest you read a textbook first and try to learn the difference between amperage and horsepower. Please do not attempt to master string theory quantum mechanics. - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Jun 17 15:15:40 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id PAA29312; Sun, 17 Jun 2001 15:11:12 -0700 Resent-Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 15:11:12 -0700 Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 15:09:47 -0700 From: Jones Beene Subject: Re: Fw: Reply to Jed from Jack Carey To: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-to: jonesb9 pacbell.net Message-id: <0GF300LFTHMHFG mta5.snfc21.pbi.net> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Opera 5.11 build 904 Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Resent-Message-ID: <"J5_W12.0.v97.0iIBx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43201 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Jed Rothwell wrote: >Carey does not mean the devices "step up" power in the normal sense of >changing voltage; he means they actually output more power (watts) than >they input. Obviously any machine that does that is creating power/energy >by itself, and can be used in a self-sustaining, stand-alone mode. The >distinction he claims here has no meaning. I do not know whether Carey is a >scam artist or not, but most scam artists make this same nonsensical >distinction. This is a warning flag. This is sounding a lot like Bearden's MEG, isn't it? Perhaps Carey would get a little more respect from his target audience (the Dennis Lee crowd) if he opts for the always popular diversionary tactic of the meaningless mantra - how does "phase conjugation" grab you? Regards, Jones Beene From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Jun 17 17:11:41 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id RAA30950; Sun, 17 Jun 2001 17:11:05 -0700 Resent-Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 17:11:05 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: rick mail.highsurf.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <002701c0f69b$41e27da0$ab181ad8 oemcomputer> References: <002701c0f69b$41e27da0$ab181ad8 oemcomputer> Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 14:07:03 -1000 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Rick Monteverde Subject: Re: Fw: Dr. Chung's Negative Resistance Replicated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Resent-Message-ID: <"Xain61.0.SZ7.OSKBx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43202 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Bruce - > I hope that was a sarcastic remark. Why? What's that supposed to mean? I was not being sarcastic. - Rick Monteverde Honolulu, HI From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Jun 17 23:30:33 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id XAA01861; Sun, 17 Jun 2001 23:30:03 -0700 Resent-Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 23:30:03 -0700 From: Robin van Spaandonk To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: An interesting anomaly Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 16:29:25 +1000 Organization: Improving Message-ID: <9f6rits5so7c68biuj46k4e253l93phf23 4ax.com> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id XAA01808 Resent-Message-ID: <"dZwGJ2.0.fS.e_PBx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43203 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Hi, Last night as I went to leave the bathroom, I stopped to turn the light off on the way out. I noticed, to my surprise that it was already turned off. I then stopped and looked up at the light and saw that it was still shining, albeit feebly. It also had travelling compression waves in the plasma (it's an 18 watt neutral white fluorescent), which when reflected from the far end of the tube resulted in standing waves (almost) at the far end. When I switched it on at the switch, it lit up to full brightness, then when switched off again returned to its strange behaviour. This particular tube is getting somewhat old, and had already developed black spots at the ends. Furthermore, yesterday was wash day, and the bathroom was full of damp air all day. I also took a shower last night, adding further to the moisture in the air. As I couldn't urn the "light" off, I went to bed. This morning when I got up, the tube was still emitting a little light from the "front" end, but that was all. I turned it on again, and it lit as normal, and when turned off glowed dimly along the full length for a short time then went out. I also listened at the switch for sparking, but couldn't hear anything. I decided to see what would happen when the tube was turned in the socket, breaking the connection. After setting a chair beneath the tube for quick access, I turned the light on for a time, then turned it off, and quickly climbed up and rotated it while it was still glowing. It went out immediately. I also attempted a test involving removing the fuse from the fuse box, however when I returned, the light was out, and I couldn't tell whether that was because of the fuse, or whether it had simply "timed out" (the time out period was getting ever shorter, and was already down to a less than 30 seconds). Now it once again behaves as a normal light, going on when switched on, and out when switch off. I shall try again, next wash day :). Hypothesis: When the air is saturated with moisture during an entire day, water vapour leaks into the tube during the course of the day (the tube is old and "leaky"). The arc in the tube dissociates the water vapour producing some hydrogen, and also some hydrinos or LL's. When turned off, UV generated by these atoms causes the tube to still emit some light. Somehow this is also connected with the existing electrical system of the lamp as well. After the air in the room becomes dry again, the hydrogen in the tube is eventually used up, and the phenomenon quits. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Jun 17 23:50:33 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id XAA06719; Sun, 17 Jun 2001 23:49:56 -0700 Resent-Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 23:49:56 -0700 From: dtmiller midiowa.net (Dean T. Miller) To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: An interesting anomaly Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 06:49:25 GMT Organization: Miller and Associates Message-ID: <3b46a39e.337753283 mail.midiowa.net> References: <9f6rits5so7c68biuj46k4e253l93phf23 4ax.com> In-Reply-To: <9f6rits5so7c68biuj46k4e253l93phf23 4ax.com> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.5/32.452 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id XAA06697 Resent-Message-ID: <"M4FPf.0.pe1.IIQBx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43204 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: On Mon, 18 Jun 2001 16:29:25 +1000, Robin van Spaandonk wrote: >Hypothesis: >When the air is saturated with moisture during an entire day, water >vapour leaks into the tube during the course of the day (the tube is old >and "leaky"). The arc in the tube dissociates the water vapour producing >some hydrogen, and also some hydrinos or LL's. Not very likely. If anything at all gets into the fluorescent tube, the gas would be able to leak out and you'd get no light. What's more likely is that your switch is being affected by the humidity, and not turning fully off. There's probably some kind of corrosion in the switch that the humidity affects and presents a path, albeit a high resistance, for the power. The lower voltage (it's still AC and still going through the ballast) is what's keeping the tube feebly glowing. -- Dean -- from (almost) Des Moines -- KB0ZDF From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Jun 17 23:59:51 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id XAA08176; Sun, 17 Jun 2001 23:59:14 -0700 Resent-Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 23:59:14 -0700 Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 23:07:19 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: An interesting anomaly Resent-Message-ID: <"KJxzl.0.g_1.1RQBx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43205 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 4:29 PM 6/18/1, Robin van Spaandonk wrote: >Hypothesis: >When the air is saturated with moisture during an entire day, water >vapour leaks into the tube during the course of the day (the tube is old >and "leaky"). The arc in the tube dissociates the water vapour producing >some hydrogen, and also some hydrinos or LL's. When turned off, UV >generated by these atoms causes the tube to still emit some light. >Somehow this is also connected with the existing electrical system of >the lamp as well. >After the air in the room becomes dry again, the hydrogen in the tube is >eventually used up, and the phenomenon quits. I suggest checking the light fixture to see if there is a hot wire present when the light switch is off. This could happen due to the switch erroneously being wired on the ground side of the circuit, or may be caused some unusual wiring requirement, like multiple switches. If you do find a hot wire in the fixture witht the switch being off, then here is another hypothesis: When the wall or some part of the lamp fixture is heavily exposed to moisture from the laundering it provides a moderate resistance electrical path to ground through the wet material, bypassing the switch. Once the filaments are heated, even the small current through the tube and the wet material may be enough to keep the filaments hot enough to produce a long term glow. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 18 00:12:00 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id AAA10979; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 00:11:22 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 00:11:22 -0700 Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 23:19:29 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: An interesting anomaly Resent-Message-ID: <"sOUUu3.0.Th2.QcQBx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43206 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 9:49 PM 6/17/1, Dean T. Miller wrote: >What's more likely is that your switch is being affected by the >humidity, and not turning fully off. There's probably some kind of >corrosion in the switch that the humidity affects and presents a path, >albeit a high resistance, for the power. The lower voltage (it's >still AC and still going through the ballast) is what's keeping the >tube feebly glowing. A very good possibility, more likely I would guess than my suggestion of a possible short to ground. This is easily checked by measuring the output voltage of the switch (relative to ground) when the switch is damp. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 18 00:35:07 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx2.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id AAA15539; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 00:31:34 -0700 (PDT) Resent-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 00:31:34 -0700 (PDT) From: Robin van Spaandonk To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: An interesting anomaly Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 17:25:49 +1000 Organization: Improving Message-ID: <54britkee7f5cpra8q9e1em8fdb5r3pcii 4ax.com> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx2.eskimo.com id AAA15522 Resent-Message-ID: <"AQSqe3.0.jo3.LvQBx" mx2> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43207 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Hi, Last night as I went to leave the bathroom, I stopped to turn the light off on the way out. I noticed, to my surprise that it was already turned off. I then stopped and looked up at the light and saw that it was still shining, albeit feebly. It also had travelling compression waves in the plasma (it's an 18 watt neutral white fluorescent), which when reflected from the far end of the tube resulted in standing waves (almost) at the far end. When I switched it on at the switch, it lit up to full brightness, then when switched off again returned to its strange behaviour. This particular tube is getting somewhat old, and had already developed black spots at the ends. Furthermore, yesterday was wash day, and the bathroom was full of damp air all day. I also took a shower last night, adding further to the moisture in the air. As I couldn't urn the "light" off, I went to bed. This morning when I got up, the tube was still emitting a little light from the "front" end, but that was all. I turned it on again, and it lit as normal, and when turned off glowed dimly along the full length for a short time then went out. I also listened at the switch for sparking, but couldn't hear anything. I decided to see what would happen when the tube was turned in the socket, breaking the connection. After setting a chair beneath the tube for quick access, I turned the light on for a time, then turned it off, and quickly climbed up and rotated it while it was still glowing. It went out immediately. I also attempted a test involving removing the fuse from the fuse box, however when I returned, the light was out, and I couldn't tell whether that was because of the fuse, or whether it had simply "timed out" (the time out period was getting ever shorter, and was already down to a less than 30 seconds). Now it once again behaves as a normal light, going on when switched on, and out when switch off. I shall try again, next wash day :). Hypothesis: When the air is saturated with moisture during an entire day, water vapour leaks into the tube during the course of the day (the tube is old and "leaky"). The arc in the tube dissociates the water vapour producing some hydrogen, and also some hydrinos or LL's. When turned off, UV generated by these atoms causes the tube to still emit some light. Somehow this is also connected with the existing electrical system of the lamp as well. After the air in the room becomes dry again, the hydrogen in the tube is eventually used up, and the phenomenon quits. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 18 01:04:23 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id BAA22248; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 01:03:49 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 01:03:49 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 03:03:03 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: thomas malloy Subject: time Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Resent-Message-ID: <"VyvCF3.0.TR5.aNRBx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43208 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: I'm in a mood to wax poetic on the subject of time. Those of you who noticed my posting about David Anderson, principal researcher of www.time-reversal.com will perhaps have reflected on his optimistic assessment regarding the potential of the research he is conducting. There is no question that he is able to accelerate the passage of time, based on a clock placed in the field, which is compared to a similar clock left outside the field. That in no way means that he will be able to reverse time. In fact, the field becomes unstable when he attempts to slow down the progression of time. This reminds me of a difference of opinion between Frank Meyer and Otto Schmitt. Otto believed that it was possible to reverse time. Frank OTOH, said that "time is not a dimension, it is a progression, and cannot be reversed." I just wish that I could return to 1970, I'd look my then self up and give him a swift kick in the ass. Then I'd go looking for Otto. BTW, I was going to post this to Keith Nagel privately, but I decided to post it for you all. It is prophesied that the sky will roll up like a scroll, taking all the stars with it. I had often wondered what kind of a weird Universe it would have to be inorder for that prophecy to come true. One day Frank and I were discussing the nature of the Universe. He was going on about light standing still and the Universe expanding through it. I replied, "so what you're telling me is that the Universe is expanding like the skin of a balloon, at the speed of light." Frank replied that this was the case. Subsequently it occurred to me, that was my answer. Hoyt, are you out there? From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 18 01:10:03 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id BAA23470; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 01:09:38 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 01:09:38 -0700 From: Robin van Spaandonk To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: An interesting anomaly Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 18:09:03 +1000 Organization: Improving Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id BAA23451 Resent-Message-ID: <"9HqBK2.0.ek5.2TRBx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43209 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Sun, 17 Jun 2001 23:19:29 -0900: >At 9:49 PM 6/17/1, Dean T. Miller wrote: > >>What's more likely is that your switch is being affected by the >>humidity, and not turning fully off. There's probably some kind of >>corrosion in the switch that the humidity affects and presents a path, >>albeit a high resistance, for the power. The lower voltage (it's >>still AC and still going through the ballast) is what's keeping the >>tube feebly glowing. > >A very good possibility, more likely I would guess than my suggestion of a >possible short to ground. This is easily checked by measuring the output >voltage of the switch (relative to ground) when the switch is damp. Neither of these suggestions explain the travelling waves (bands of light and shade) in the tube (though these did disappear more or less after the tube had been removed from its holder and put back in again). The wavelength of the bands was about 5-8 cm (hard to say exactly because they were moving). Nevertheless these are indeed likely explanations. I'll see if I can measure a voltage between earth and the lamp, with the switch turned off. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 18 01:17:55 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id BAA25124; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 01:17:26 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 01:17:26 -0700 From: Robin van Spaandonk To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: time Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 18:16:52 +1000 Organization: Improving Message-ID: <10eritccmollnsl6kb9q5riq9onsp84so6 4ax.com> References: In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id BAA25102 Resent-Message-ID: <"_e5id2.0.U86.LaRBx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43210 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: In reply to thomas malloy's message of Mon, 18 Jun 2001 03:03:03 -0500: [snip] >There is no question that he is able to accelerate the passage of >time, based on a clock placed in the field, which is compared to a >similar clock left outside the field. That in no way means that he >will be able to reverse time. In fact, the field becomes unstable >when he attempts to slow down the progression of time. I've looked at quite a few of the things posted on the site, but still haven't come across this. Could you give the exact URL? [snip] >to post it for you all. It is prophesied that the sky will roll up >like a scroll, taking all the stars with it. I had often wondered Ask yourself what the sky would look like as the earth entered the event horizon of a black hole. >what kind of a weird Universe it would have to be inorder for that >prophecy to come true. One day Frank and I were discussing the nature >of the Universe. He was going on about light standing still and the >Universe expanding through it. I replied, "so what you're telling me >is that the Universe is expanding like the skin of a balloon, at the >speed of light." Frank replied that this was the case. Subsequently >it occurred to me, that was my answer. Hoyt, are you out there? [snip] Wouldn't this result in all light travelling in the same direction? Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 18 06:17:35 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id GAA21493; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 06:16:45 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 06:16:45 -0700 X-Apparently-From: Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.20010618081121.00959a20 postoffice.swbell.net> X-Sender: cjford1 pop.mail.yahoo.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58 Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 08:16:42 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Charles Ford Subject: Re: An interesting anomaly In-Reply-To: <3b46a39e.337753283 mail.midiowa.net> References: <9f6rits5so7c68biuj46k4e253l93phf23 4ax.com> <9f6rits5so7c68biuj46k4e253l93phf23 4ax.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <"kn2241.0.lF5.zyVBx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43211 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 06:49 AM 6/18/01 +0000, you wrote: >On Mon, 18 Jun 2001 16:29:25 +1000, Robin van Spaandonk > wrote: > > >Hypothesis: > >When the air is saturated with moisture during an entire day, water > >vapour leaks into the tube during the course of the day (the tube is old > >and "leaky"). The arc in the tube dissociates the water vapour producing > >some hydrogen, and also some hydrinos or LL's. > >Not very likely. If anything at all gets into the fluorescent tube, >the gas would be able to leak out and you'd get no light. Interesting except that the gas in the tube is at about 1/10 atmosphere pressure. Leaky tubs gain gas rather then loose it. The increase of gas raises the voltage needed to arc causing the tube to eventually fail.. Moisture is unlikely to be able to enter or exit due to the size of the molicule. Humidity effects these tubes because it combines with dust and forms a conductive film around the tube. Charlie Ford KC5-OWZ cjford1 yahoo.com cjford1 swbell.net _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 18 06:27:37 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id GAA24232; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 06:26:46 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 06:26:46 -0700 X-Apparently-From: Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.20010618081821.00952ac0 postoffice.swbell.net> X-Sender: cjford1 pop.mail.yahoo.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58 Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 08:26:44 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Charles Ford Subject: Re: An interesting anomaly In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <"SuvRl2.0.Ow5.M6WBx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43212 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Folks... There is no anomaly about afterglow with florescent tubes. The coating is phosphorous. There is also no anomaly about power off glow which is caused by your wiring. When the switch is installed in the neutral line rather then the hot a tube can glow depending upon the amount of ground coupling. Which will very with humidity. At 06:09 PM 6/18/01 +1000, you wrote: >In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Sun, 17 Jun 2001 23:19:29 >-0900: > > >At 9:49 PM 6/17/1, Dean T. Miller wrote: > > > >>What's more likely is that your switch is being affected by the > >>humidity, and not turning fully off. There's probably some kind of > >>corrosion in the switch that the humidity affects and presents a path, > >>albeit a high resistance, for the power. The lower voltage (it's > >>still AC and still going through the ballast) is what's keeping the > >>tube feebly glowing. > > > >A very good possibility, more likely I would guess than my suggestion of a > >possible short to ground. This is easily checked by measuring the output > >voltage of the switch (relative to ground) when the switch is damp. > >Neither of these suggestions explain the travelling waves (bands of >light and shade) in the tube (though these did disappear more or less >after the tube had been removed from its holder and put back in again). >The wavelength of the bands was about 5-8 cm (hard to say exactly >because they were moving). > >Nevertheless these are indeed likely explanations. I'll see if I can >measure a voltage between earth and the lamp, with the switch turned >off. > > >Regards, > >Robin van Spaandonk > >http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ Charlie Ford KC5-OWZ cjford1 yahoo.com cjford1 swbell.net _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 18 07:03:49 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id HAA07043; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 07:03:01 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 07:03:01 -0700 From: Standing Bear To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Amish not luddites Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 10:07:55 -0700 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.1.99] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" References: <002e01c0f685$152fa0a0$69181ad8 oemcomputer> <5.0.2.1.2.20010617151026.00a8f650@pop.mindspring.com> In-Reply-To: <5.0.2.1.2.20010617151026.00a8f650 pop.mindspring.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01061810075500.00884 linux> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id HAA06996 Resent-Message-ID: <"kfAS71.0.zj1.LeWBx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43213 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: On Sunday 17 June 2001 12:22, Jed Rothwell wrote: > Keith Nagel wrote: > > >Oh yes, and the part about selling some hyper advanced > >technology to the Amish strikes me as truly bizarre. > >I mean, you do realize that the Amish drive around in > >horse drawn buggies, right? These people aren't what > >one might call early adopters... > > No, they are not. They are 50 to 300 years behind the times in some ways. > Some of them consider buttons too decorative for clothing. > > > > I think the phrase > >Luddite might be more appropriate. > > I disagree. I have not had many dealings with them, but a childhood friend > of mine used to spend his summers working with them, and they live not far > from my property in Pennsylvania. I do not think it is fair to call them > luddites. I would not want to join the Amish, and I do not care for their > attitudes toward education, but I have great respect for their views about > technology. They adapt inventions which enhance their community values, > such as off-grid electricity, indoor plumbing, modern medicine, > refrigeration for diary farms and Cheerios breakfast cereal. They try out > many new technologies, and sometimes reject them years later, or modify > them in clever ways to avoid a negative impact on society (both theirs and > ours). In the 1920s many of them used automobiles but later decided that in > most case most people should not have them. They make reasonable, humane > exceptions to their rules. They do not withdraw from the rest of society or > refuse to participate. They are quite different from extremist fanatics on > both ends of the spectrum. > > - Jed We live near Middlebury, Indiana. If there is an Amish Capitol of the world, this place is IT! The ones that we have seen here are the reverse of most of us who display and use technology that we do not understand and are unable to really maintain in the absence of 'professionals'. We take our cars to dealers (shade trees and hot rodders excepted). We throw away our appliances instead of getting them fixed (dealers here refuse to service them, clearing all service calls through 'sales departments' before giving you false promises and leaving a bill for 30 percent of the profit on a new machine as a consolation prize to them for having failed to convert a service call to a new sale). Fifty percent of all groceries are literally trash, with packaging being and waste or unusable product predominating over real content: e.g. 'fish sticks, frozen' come in a large box containing up to 50 percent of the volume of the total product package; 70 percent of the rest is the bread batter that is cheap and therefor predominates; only 15 percent of the total packaging is really what you wanted--the fish, short fibers that could have been swept off the floor as leftovers from packaging a higher quality product for higher paying 'customers'. We are a 'consumer' society that expects everything to be done for us, but really end up having everything done TO us. The Amish, on the other hand, are intimately familiar with all the technology that they hide and do not display openly, even that which they have their Bishop's permission to use. They use cold rolled steel axles with tapered roller bearings in those 'primitive buggies'. The same also have vinyl coverings in the tops and modern low voltage wiring for the lights. Some even have disk brakes. They use technologies in their kitchens, with absorption cycle refrigeration and candy and baking thermometers, and gasoline and/or propane powered equipment of many kinds. Their children can have automobiles before getting married and 'joining' the flock. Many of these are drop-dead hot rods. No drivers are faster than an Amish kid. Many race drivers come from this part of the country. A good 70 percent of the welders in this part of the country are of Amish background, as are many of the mechanics. Amish doctors are among the best in the world. Bottom line. DO NOT let these gentle and unassuming folk fool you! They are a LOT smarter than they look, and they are hard working. Most of the liquid cash assets in any county with Amish presence is in their hands, not in banks. Standing Bear From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 18 07:30:38 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id HAA14921; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 07:29:38 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 07:29:38 -0700 Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 07:28:09 -0700 From: Jones Beene Subject: Re: An interesting anomaly To: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-to: jonesb9 pacbell.net Message-id: <0GF400DYOQX4M8 mta5.snfc21.pbi.net> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Opera 5.11 build 904 Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Resent-Message-ID: <"93S7Z.0.-e3.I1XBx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43214 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Greetings, >Robin van Spaandonk wrote: >>Hypothesis: >>When the air is saturated with moisture during an entire day, water >>vapour leaks into the tube during the course of the day (the tube is old >>and "leaky"). The arc in the tube dissociates the water vapour producing >>some hydrogen, and also some hydrinos or LL's. When turned off, UV >>generated by these atoms causes the tube to still emit some light. >>Somehow this is also connected with the existing electrical system of >>the lamp as well. This is interesting, and I have often wondered if any of the surprising efficiency of a fluorescent tube is due to a weak hydrino effect - but remember, the initial fill of many new tubes contains 5% or so hydrogen (along with argon and some Hg vapor), and since the phenomenon you witness is occurring with an older tube, then the answer is probably more mundane. Also there is small amount of H2 in the air naturally, and one doesn't need to resort to the water vapor hypothesis to explain how some of it (or LLs) would accumulate inside a sealed tube. Also, when one optimizes the frequency in a fluorescent, it is possible to get significant light with one watt or less. I have personally done this experiment many times. The best results are obtained at the ion-acoustic frequency range of the tube fill, usually in the ~1-3 khz. If you can hear it when glowing - this may be the case in your tube. The ultimate problem, then, as mentioned by Horace Heffner is likely a switch that when moistened will pass a watt or so of power, particularly at higher sparking frequencies. HH wrote: >When the wall or some part of the lamp fixture is heavily exposed to >moisture from the laundering it provides a moderate resistance electrical >path to ground through the wet material, bypassing the switch. Once the >filaments are heated, even the small current through the tube and the wet >material may be enough to keep the filaments hot enough to produce a long >term glow. Well, fluorescents are all cold cathode, but your wet switch will probably pass a watt or two in the off position, particularly if it has contacts that have been degraded with an absorbent (dust or laundry lint). Regards, Jones Beene From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 18 07:53:20 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id HAA24078; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 07:52:35 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 07:52:35 -0700 Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20010618102731.02951e50 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 10:52:43 -0400 To: vortex-L eskimo.com, JCarey9622@aol.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: Re: Fw: Reply to Jed from Jack Carey In-Reply-To: <0GF300LFTHMHFG mta5.snfc21.pbi.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <"u5lWK3.0.8u5.oMXBx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43215 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Jones Beene wrote: > >Carey does not mean the devices "step up" power in the normal sense of > >changing voltage; he means they actually output more power (watts) than > >they input. Obviously any machine that does that is creating power/energy > >by itself, and can be used in a self-sustaining, stand-alone mode. >. . . most scam artists make this same nonsensical > >distinction. This is a warning flag. > > >This is sounding a lot like Bearden's MEG, isn't it? Yes. But I know nothing about Bearden personally, and I would not want to call him a scam artist. He is confused, and angry, and his statements about electricity are wrong, but I have no idea whether he has solicited funds for the machines. He seems to sincerely believe his own statements, as does Jack Carey. I have no idea what either of them is saying; this talk of "stepping up" amps into horsepower is nonsense as far as I know. But if these people ever present ordinary, credible evidence with meaningful units of measurement, I will be happy to examine it. If the claims are true, they could arrange a real test in a few weeks for very little money. I stress the need for *ordinary* evidence, with standard meters and tools. Extraordinary claims call for the most ordinary ho-hum proof you can devise. What Ken Rauen observed in Carey's garage was a mish-mash of different instrument types, none of which was designed to measure energy. He senses there might be something anomalous, but it is impossible to judge. The demo depends upon subjective events such as overhead lights growing dimmer and brighter. That happens at my house all the time, without rhyme or rhythm. I purchased UPS computer power supplies after losing 1 computer and 3 modems. >Perhaps Carey would get a little more respect from his target audience >(the Dennis Lee crowd) if he opts for the always popular diversionary >tactic of the meaningless mantra - how does "phase conjugation" grab you? Great! It has a linguistic ring, and an antique, Victorian touch. - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 18 07:57:37 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id HAA25647; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 07:57:07 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 07:57:07 -0700 Message-ID: <001501c0f7fc$5989db80$c5181ad8 oemcomputer> From: "Bruce Meland" To: Subject: Re: Barn roof free energy Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 06:41:15 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Resent-Message-ID: <"i8oTF1.0.fG6.3RXBx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43216 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Have you tole this to the person that wrote this slam? -----Original Message----- From: thomas malloy To: vortex-l eskimo.com Date: Sunday, June 03, 2001 11:22 PM Subject: Re: Barn roof free energy >>----- Original Message ----- >>From: "Bruce Meland" >>To: >>Cc: ; ; >>Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2001 12:47 PM >>Subject: Re: Barn roof free energy >> >>Bruce, >> >>I think you would've been better off to have spent that $37.00 plus S & H on a >>"Shrink". :-) >> >>Regards, Frederick > >I agree, I linked to Dr. Lindermann's site from Jerry Decker's site. >I asked him some pointed questions. I have yet to receive a reply. >Bottom line, anybody can write a book, but it takes a break through >to heat water. > >> >> >>> I think you serious tinkerers would save a lot of time and money if you >>> purchased the recent published book "The Free Energy Secrets of Cold >> > Electricity by Dr. Peter Lindemann for about $37, includes shipping and > > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 18 08:23:39 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id IAA04104; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 08:22:41 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 08:22:41 -0700 Message-ID: <006901c0f7ff$ec8a9480$c5181ad8 oemcomputer> From: "Bruce Meland" To: Subject: Re: Other Hyrogen fuel Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 07:06:50 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Resent-Message-ID: <"dntgO.0.201.1pXBx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43217 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Still Sounds similar to Park's tactics -----Original Message----- From: Jed Rothwell To: vortex-l eskimo.com ; vortex-l@eskimo.com Date: Sunday, June 17, 2001 12:08 PM Subject: Re: Other Hyrogen fuel >Bruce Meland wrote: > >>Hey Jed Parks; since when are you the authority in most energy issues and >>debunking technology that you know nothing or very little about? > >I have not "debunked" anything here lately. I merely reported my exchange >with Jack Carey in detail, quoting him verbatim as closely as I can >remember. His claims sound impossible to me, but they sound impossible to >anyone with any knowledge of basic science. It is not "debunking" to point >that out, or to point out that he did not give me any quantitative data, >experiment description, photographs, or anything else that a normal person >would provide as proof of a claim. He has effectively debunked himself. >Perhaps he will understand this and come through with some data. I would be >happy to look at it. > > >>Yes you sound like Parks most of the time. > >Parks is a hot dog and sausage company. You probably mean Robert Park, of >the APS. He does not resemble a hot dog and I do not resemble him. > > >> Listen to this; Bernie Faber an Oregon >>Dairyman is conducting a pilot plant operation in cooperation with Portland >>General Electric to produce electricity from dairy cow manure. > >Yes, I am well aware of this and many similar projects. > >- Jed > > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 18 09:04:42 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id JAA19098; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 09:02:54 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 09:02:54 -0700 Message-ID: <011201c0f805$85f191a0$c5181ad8 oemcomputer> From: "Bruce Meland" To: Cc: Subject: Fw: US DOE Asks for Public Comments--June 29 Deadline Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 07:46:52 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 1 X-MSMail-Priority: High X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Content-Type: multipart/related; type="multipart/alternative"; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_010D_01C0F7CA.D992B9A0" Resent-Message-ID: <"ezHXM3.0.Cg4.jOYBx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43218 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_010D_01C0F7CA.D992B9A0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_001_010E_01C0F7CA.D992B9A0" ------=_NextPart_001_010E_01C0F7CA.D992B9A0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable -----Original Message----- From: Integrity Research Institute, Thomas Valone To: iri erols.com Date: Sunday, June 17, 2001 8:02 PM Subject: US DOE Asks for Public Comments--June 29 Deadline <<<<<<<<<<<<< HIGH PRIORITY RE: ENERGY >>>>>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ------- =20 This is one chance for anyone and everyone to tell the US D.O.E. what = you really think! Announced belatedly on June 7th, the "townhall" = meetings THIS MONTH in various cities across the nation offer ordinary = citizens five (5) full minutes to tell Energy Secretary Abraham what = should be done about the energy problem. Look for the nearest city to = you if you want to speak in person (I did 3 years ago). First, review = the National Energy Policy online to see if you think they left = something out :-) www.energy.gov Then, if as many people as possible = contribute their educated thoughts about the energy crisis directly to = the DOE, the comments will go on record in a big way. In DC, the in-person opportunity will occur at the Washington Hilton, = 1919 Connecticut Ave NW, on June 26th from 10 AM to 9 PM.=20 You may mail in your commentary instead, but it must reach the DOE by 5 = PM on June 29, 2001. =20 YOU MAY ALSO EMAIL YOUR COMMENTS TO: EERENEP.comments ee.doe.gov =20 Please try to participate and do so before the deadline. Let your = colleagues and friends know about this rare opportunity. The combined voice of alternative energy can be heard. =20 (See below for more details.) --TV -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ------- Public Meetings on Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Programs = Scheduled =20 The Department of Energy (DOE) today announced the locations and details = of seven public meetings that will be held across the country throughout = the month of June. The first-of-its-kind public outreach effort will = allow the public, elected officials and energy experts to provide the = department with information regarding the current funding and historic = performance of its Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy = programs. These meetings are one part of a comprehensive review of the = programs called for in President Bush=92s National Energy Policy = released last month.=20 =93Energy efficiency and the development of renewable energy resources = are critical elements of the President=92s National Energy Policy,=94 = said Secretary of Energy Spencer Abraham. =93The public=92s input at = these meetings will help us identify opportunities for future research = and investment while assessing our past effectiveness in these areas.=94 = The Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy funds research, = development, demonstration and deployment of affordable, advanced energy = technologies and practices in five energy sectors -- buildings, = industry, transportation, power generation and delivery, and federal = government facilities.=20 Comments offered at these meetings should address the objectives of the = current energy efficiency and renewable energy research, development, = demonstration and deployment programs; suggested potential objectives = for future programs; implementation of current and future programs; and = whether these federal programs are achieving intended objectives.=20 Each meeting will be held from 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. From 9:00 a.m. to = 10:00 a.m. the department will receive comments from public officials = only. Details on the locations and dates of the meetings follows:=20 June 12 Atlanta, Georgia - Main Auditorium (Lower Level), Richard B. = Russell Federal Building and Courthouse, 75 Spring Street SW, Atlanta, = Ga.=20 =20 June 12 Chicago, Illinois - James Benton Parson Memorial = Court Room Dirksen Federal Building, Room 2525, 219 South Dearborn = Street, Chicago, Ill.=20 =20 June 19 Boston, Massachusetts - John A. Volpe National = Transportation Systems Center, 55 Broadway, Kendall Square, Cambridge, = Mass.=20 =20 June 19 Seattle, Washington - Bell Harbor International = Conference Center International Promenade Room, Pier 66, 2211 Alaskan = Way, Seattle, Wash.=20 =20 June 21 Denver, Colorado - Adam's Mark Hotel Denver, 1550 = Court Place Denver, Colo.=20 =20 June 21 Philadelphia, Pennsylvania - Location: Sheraton = Rittenhouse Square Hotel, 18th and Locust Streets (255 South 18th = Street), Philadelphia, PA 19103=20 =20 June 26 Washington, D. C. - Washington Hilton and Towers, = 1919 Connecticut Avenue, Washington, D. C.=20 =20 To accommodate as many individuals as possible speakers will be limited = to five minutes. Written comments will also be accepted but must be = submitted to the department by 5:00 p.m. EDT, June 29, 2001. Written = comments should be no more than four single spaced pages, using 12 pitch = font and 1 inch margins. All written comments will be included in the = proceedings of the seven public meetings. Comments may be sent to: Ms. = Bonny Overton, U. S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency = and Renewable Energy, EE 3.1, 1000 Independence Avenue, S. W., = Washington, DC 20585, or via electronic mail to = EERENEP.comments ee.doe.gov=20 Copies of the National Energy Policy can be found on the web at = www.energy.gov=20 For further information about EERE programs, please visit = www.EREN.doe.gov=20 Media Contact: Jill Schroeder 202/586-4940, Chris Kielich 202/586-5806=20 Release No. R-01-092=20 Release Date: June 07, 2001=20 -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ------- ------=_NextPart_001_010E_01C0F7CA.D992B9A0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 
-----Original = Message-----
From:=20 Integrity Research Institute, Thomas Valone <iri@erols.com>
To: iri@erols.com <iri@erols.com>
Date: = Sunday, June=20 17, 2001 8:02 PM
Subject: US DOE Asks for Public = Comments--June 29=20 Deadline

<<<<<<<<<<<<&l= t;=20 HIGH PRIORITY RE: ENERGY >>>>>>>>>
This is one chance for anyone and = everyone to=20 tell the US D.O.E. what you really think! = Announced belatedly on=20 June 7th, the "townhall" meetings THIS MONTH in = various=20 cities across the nation offer ordinary citizens five (5) full = minutes=20 to tell Energy Secretary Abraham what should be done about the = energy=20 problem. Look for the nearest city to you if you want to speak in = person (I=20 did 3 years ago). First, review the National Energy Policy online to see = if you=20 think they left something out :-) www.energy.gov Then, if as many = people as=20 possible contribute their educated thoughts about the energy crisis = directly to=20 the DOE, the comments will go on record in a big way.
 
In DC, the in-person opportunity = will occur=20 at the Washington Hilton, 1919 Connecticut Ave NW, on June 26th from 10 = AM to 9=20 PM. 
 
You may mail in your=20 commentary instead, but it must reach the DOE by 5 PM on June = 29,=20 2001.  
 
YOU MAY ALSO EMAIL YOUR COMMENTS = TO: EERENEP.comments@ee.doe.gov =20
 
Please try to participate and do so before = the=20 deadline. Let your colleagues and friends know about this rare=20 opportunity.
The combined voice of alternative energy can = be=20 heard.  
(See below for more details.)   = --TV

 

Public Meetings on Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Programs=20 Scheduled

 
The Department of Energy (DOE) today announced the = locations and=20 details of seven public meetings that will be held across the country = throughout=20 the month of June. The first-of-its-kind public outreach effort will = allow the=20 public, elected officials and energy experts to provide the department = with=20 information regarding the current funding and historic performance of = its Office=20 of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy programs. These meetings are = one part=20 of a comprehensive review of the programs called for in President = Bush’s=20 National Energy Policy released last month.=20

“Energy efficiency and the development of renewable energy = resources=20 are critical elements of the President’s National Energy = Policy,”=20 said Secretary of Energy Spencer Abraham. “The public’s = input at=20 these meetings will help us identify opportunities for future research = and=20 investment while assessing our past effectiveness in these areas.” =

The Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy funds research,=20 development, demonstration and deployment of affordable, advanced energy = technologies and practices in five energy sectors -- buildings, = industry,=20 transportation, power generation and delivery, and federal government=20 facilities.=20

Comments offered at these meetings should address the objectives of = the=20 current energy efficiency and renewable energy research, development,=20 demonstration and deployment programs; suggested potential objectives = for future=20 programs; implementation of current and future programs; and whether = these=20 federal programs are achieving intended objectives.=20

Each meeting will be held from 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. From 9:00 a.m. = to 10:00=20 a.m. the department will receive comments from public officials only. = Details on=20 the locations and dates of the meetings follows:=20

June 12 Atlanta, Georgia - Main Auditorium (Lower = Level),=20 Richard B. Russell Federal Building and Courthouse, 75 = Spring Street=20 SW, Atlanta, Ga.
 
June 12 Chicago, Illinois - James Benton Parson = Memorial=20 Court Room Dirksen Federal Building, Room 2525, 219 South = Dearborn=20 Street, Chicago, Ill.
 
June 19 Boston, Massachusetts - John A. Volpe = National=20 Transportation Systems Center, 55 Broadway, Kendall Square,=20 Cambridge, Mass.
 
June 19 Seattle, Washington - Bell Harbor = International=20 Conference Center International Promenade Room, Pier 66, = 2211=20 Alaskan Way, Seattle, Wash.
 
June 21 Denver, Colorado - Adam's Mark Hotel Denver, = 1550=20 Court Place Denver, Colo.
 
June 21 Philadelphia, Pennsylvania - Location: = Sheraton=20 Rittenhouse Square Hotel, 18th and Locust Streets (255 South = 18th=20 Street), Philadelphia, PA 19103
 
June 26 Washington, D. C. - Washington Hilton and = Towers,=20 1919 Connecticut Avenue, Washington, D. = C.

To accommodate as many individuals as possible speakers will be = limited to=20 five minutes. Written comments will also be accepted but must be = submitted to the department by 5:00 p.m. EDT, June 29, 2001. = Written=20 comments should be no more than four single spaced pages, using 12 pitch = font=20 and 1 inch margins. All written comments will be included in the = proceedings of=20 the seven public meetings. Comments may be sent to: Ms. Bonny Overton, = U. S.=20 Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, = EE 3.1,=20 1000 Independence Avenue, S. W., Washington, DC 20585, or via = electronic=20 mail to EERENEP.comments@ee.doe.gov=20

Copies of the National Energy Policy can be found on the web at www.energy.gov=20

For further information about EERE programs, please visit www.EREN.doe.gov=20

Media Contact:  Jill Schroeder 202/586-4940, Chris = Kielich=20 202/586-5806=20

Release No. R-01-092


Release = Date: June 07,=20 2001 =

 


------=_NextPart_001_010E_01C0F7CA.D992B9A0-- ------=_NextPart_000_010D_01C0F7CA.D992B9A0 Content-Type: image/gif Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-ID: <00fe01c0f805$82cd6e40$c5181ad8 oemcomputer> R0lGODlhkACNANUAAAAAAA8JERYXGR8gISkgCBYwISkpKQ4PmS8xOAoXnjQ5PUJBQjg9qU9PURFl T1pZWQB0bmxiMQB6X1BYrWVkYgCEY1xonGlvcB6MVH52MW13cy6SSjyVTFKSNXOHKn17e0mdRo6J I1mcSIeFg4OUJG2lPJCPjaeaEaOYUnyuM5GqKp6enLmpL5+3K6yqqLjAJMa7IL67uNjAYt/LFs3J x/LRFuTSfNTSzv/XAt7a1eTf3Pvsnuvr6//69f///wAA/yH5BAEAAD8ALAAAAACQAI0AQAb/QJ9w SCwaj8jksefrOZ/QKHMqZCqv2Kx2yzVCeU6emKfLmW9oGs0sY4U6oIqkQpfY5fK5vgKh5zkdHicy O12Gh4hVT2BiZTlpNzYqG3gSGCIvJRAYLzUzchg4MyItFSUSJZoSIKJ3LTggc3IQKbB2rDOWOC8V GCUweXZ2GB4yicdIX2NmajQ2JMElMzg4HHvTKSJzfRUgJCEWCQkH4uXi5OPl6Ojm5uQHFiEnIpUV KTUYEhy9EBItNTjy3SmGLMuiRo9oxLihQqAdETOm4aiRIsWpOR1IMHDXrh26BjeIxIix4sOHGz1u jKQgQJ3LjhzNhdCQrxcHDLVwqKDTogQe/w+FCh4sozAGjRN6QJR4QQ2YrDngXno8RzWd1XXlFJgw 48NFyBgjKDRAALPs1JgJJpyoOWrTjH816lQAaqjHMpUxXMjogAeEL4lv5YDQIPUs1qtV2SEwcQGA Bh4CBgD4oAFAABcmLF9QYLbz2Y4WoOG8JeeXwA3GrCixqwPvChMyKK160UIiNRAQNngwXLUjuwPy TggfTry48ePIh8OAEc5zWXQaOuSu0QIECBVMT8mBgYVHDhouXmtgseFOBYA4LtLxQPiw+97sxoWI VYGDRPSBZaVo4aAEqRakkPLJMLaJYk0FJFzQm3OIMQCNLPak4JAdNlyhg0IrjKDBA+Tpof8CNSDW MAcJzb1nFW/ydXCHHnu0KMwdENgHoig17ZEHggoexiBVDIQgF4t7YFChEheSxNgDDXQoQYD7vYLD BrnthpZz68z34iUigGDNU5WwAuIMNeIkwgYbkJACB/vRkSBiO6ZzgXQVRBRLPhxcJAEL3bVm5IYL IIBCLHPsw0FtTcnRgQbxeabjBdroUwIGN4mgHh8coAdDjfVAetOWeJDYZkcTeEDHNDD4BEE/eWCQ GhZ2kaESZhuOZQAF0PBR25acqHARBidM8GlVFlzgxx0zqNCHoyootWl9de4jEB4I+vprAgysNQeh OLDARzASdLADD0100SoPr5rwgVgKIDD/gAAZiCpHbS8c+MpbNVWggZQw6WiOB6La+OKKfJh3AaKJ eqYBCTVxgEMpmzj5An3d2lCGGAU10eojeZkrVp8GCBDAAO3WwaIcGyw8R353YEDCCR5s9NmJaclz gY4FM6DBCQgHI0ctNQCqzwtjstgBCze4sFAOOoDrRMVehOFqXq99cAGSChjQsccBINAuBnjgRN0e LZSyiyUpQFACDlnOAMI0/s3ASwkpgFCLz7WUh8rCZqenj87CEAODDCaMsILRCyVNsWpMb6FMGTco FF7gGlCA5ALpWr0u1gEEAIACEbTrQRwQ9vMvkP/6UV9GJ6AQwgMKLNDAAxRc8IEJgxu9/4bhViCe +O5FTOE0GWcU5cLwK7wW+AiUaaD8BcxfEHvzAyuvwQcjjGAC7cUPPxINaCCN+xO8h890FIyMO4YO 6Kdv+Bh22WWxFFGIL/8xX4zrCBqNR8KCB8+adwl2NXjBySbCAVqIAAPGOts+dpKUGsAAEykg3TA6 EAIb6G5+yDgIQhLCPRbwJQ8geAUMNgGluIUiF2erjmxO1QsMbKAEJOAXv0gQQxmSoASU4JodUOUL GLRAh9CSAFNSYIoX2E0CGzhBUDDoBYstIyELsZYwKHWbvFXjDiAIgYIUtaAJWOCLE1AAZ070G7Og Ix58ucMLIijEGnDgBRiIkd0QtMTEhf+BNVCkgbYIRA0VPGSNsvBACAqzoMScgyzmWMwNwNUE8GgA AQh4R5vi85t74SFsABrGP551ggsqrlVEGUkMWKBDSemQEzjkAwVjQklDsklHDXABD0bgAu6t4AFG cYFJLkCWgv0qUQeIDk9+CBFqwPEOIfBkMsbQOKiR0g4bmIF/VICNO5AARShiBwlmBAMWfGhG3wRR CGaEgxOQswbmnJG0ptWOz0nwFbg6QRaeFp4RyMBdU1zRHDAwSFeaiJVWwgBOmEKNH/pliqTojz9K EEKArQgDBcJBc9iJDkahykV5EEEdj6AnzEjNWjd6ER5O4DIT6eslwKHPtioxMj0MaAb/DhCZjL5U I1ms6aRUEketbFSPCgwpCd8hyQimhoJ+VSBedIBUJjaBr3/6JjFWqoQIVLCTIL5IYeTsYx9CWIID VeKmhczpBS4CggCqTKBcg4AIfooE70Atcg1QgBQlQAscEPGNB7omO9VxgQcJhqGScqiXjMmBmwCp Plra0hR7BTMGoeNzbvnhDgNriU52hwwY0tAD+vQApIBCLv1QARsD0VhslsMCGhiWyEAxjVIkxT/Z cCi3RvSyzsBDA3YgaNkCpVKgLM0gPhDDd+p5gQb0aQAN8JEd0DQNeiGQgXNB1F5DsI/D6kGgIhAB B7Kkpa4+Kin9/FU8avLDOtGhIQJF/+a3wKBMVrHmVRkqLsc8FoEQlHJAbtEbS4kRFZzCJx70aNGN OHCCmT0VJj3iHx7ORg2L0KO5XvWADbqXNPBV7CBBDY/UNlu1dWWuvuVJ6g8rYLJroe08zxLZPrsR CA98g4YwJoEKakiCA+pwipegDQfW1r+eXAti/JQBSWyHNPa2d3fKgGI94RpXBBjgcpkDwALqC7op DmoGB2JFBEGxC07U58tKicgUa/FDEvBCn4EiAQtYcK7p0Y7IuBvCkZnYu/eNS8nhyRBlpoYk41IO klZ78gDWRWgBGHrQiB50oCGJgNa57nWxm571ameUGxTZyHOmM+98V7/zoc8MZ8Bf4/+awT3u4Q/U 6hsDey2m6VYLhXytap8YZA2u8sEPCqymgqt37d5FmC99oA5194q8AxvYQAYyWM5wWPA3Y+/gt4jL NK/Dx+lf3w8SOZAByzCVTxXXSUIlEK1F4pbP0fmBgjDY6LTtGFz7hVoNNthfHAFWghr48agBSUV6 VbDdibSAjRKoBafsQGZZeMIOr+hJiIXRASWuuy609g4HbyAD+15VmhAIITYkJIp3pQcT8bIOpnr6 o5+VoDaawIAnNuBGAbfgmIE0xsOb5u40cG8tx6LrG/UxkWe9wIg67AMGQCDIBFmAAe84gCQN+Q4G eDEEMTzgas0jgWlQsxQjJuJP2Or/6iSnIQbPqAMn7BojinCNEmfCIg3Xma8pwUcqBTsAAwRRZVPU QBMnhwALcEAHGIBuLlwX3xcYpxIaxGbBcYjGRKDLgTWFlZUT8KIFGsDLAFDgejmIgQUQSdEExKPu Va9GP8q6CzwkUdpcYAIjvNPMGOyFW6UJW31cW4G+/vIcDWDA5gWAANSaQJdCyHx4Gg13LrokZDsD E0Tp0YJ9+AE1F3Ya4xRCgxYIAxN0hdswrJEbkr6MZv40hwIuYGlwPeJxY9lrY8lhJUt0FQZ99IV6 SKBuLSwNIXg5ijDglo+Gdbyyr8RK4ccmCbAYOVBLjJQSK3ABfVJajvUy7RcKJwZ7/3QULsAVBowz Ei7wTDzXEC3Ab14GAaRVWyY1gAUYAzywAo1DABSgEA9AfisQSw3weJ8CTJY0B54AOmoFKBUgT9Lm NEoWAw+yXKlQQEcVRx2gAijVdgEYDwlyAb7idAwQEj5wAy3AAiTAAT4gCCXgAzPmA0rRASiwEbo3 AQzgMup3DtFhYjohUJswEIUwZ3gEXzFgVMkyIdbXg2znStl0WiEQAjPGMgdzMB5gARNAAsqDiBMg PYh4AoO4dqERGgniSzVYLXQgIYNCIw7hLZeVYYNzAixVB33gE/aChgHogOoQAgu3YlASUtDyLs4X ii4CUSAyUerXEDxFdXNRf0TAev8Z8wEyoB3+siIlsEUlSIDxEVWVck6SdX1dtV2SMigCZgnoQQ01 sAGHgoq2pYb4VA8PFXhF0FEZMh5ANAddxSUqMAHH6F/pEFVLwgKeUCpVJgtvgQoOEFh5aAkF0nKd Qhg0+BxUMYT+UFA6A45E0FEmEDmgyFIvQooqgIbHeGDkQAIQA3u5aJH6UI09VzojYoz/CJACaVWg YJBDEFTx9QAoQFYCtEMsUoyn6Evv4Y4kQ26yxSIsl1Vo4yIsgoh8uCPB5C71cXIScWZCcgUmOVQv CF3/0g+k2DJLaHyPpVJzkAJU5RAMSVdOAhAsMAwmdAkSohRywJME6JMIo0/SgCb/NUEXRFIusTIC RnURJYMPyGSKt5cAHqAif+AXIKANVwl/1AAmAtYNouV8L+J4lGhG4rAWGOBaekBucqBR3TFcJSFf F4BPYTMmeSBZFHSYiFkOykUHXVVj5+hSWQWY+5VYhEkyeqWNZvEmm2ANOXEbcJhpwgUeJYEuCmBx qyAKB6QPMLBlPMmZPZkAa1EfGwApx3kTmUkNe4Rm5mE6w0J0hOQcN9g3TnJFlYVrVyBcUHMucTUr O/Uoa1NQ2qcP4dWZvtFXP5IHKcQNy6UlcZAKfLNaGnFgnnGXm8ALdWWNqrCLFnYFi3CUU3NctGKR dkcjdtBw03JGyrUKwkgHhaUl/9olUN2wXb0gIdcVAnS5Ix4gLHdDSn1wDzk5B0CBaZ8EPN25MU9m AKoICqUwKALVfN8FFdJlfOagAT4ydRyQLNaBmsfpC72pMur4KzgqECcHEDAAgkuRKizQAxWma4rT BCiqYfLlZAKQm0ckUPCXC3YwA1s2ByBwArY4lhzBLyPXbdfFL26HYCeQRsJwZSVWAaXgB0pUfrOG eksgBMCDIQlJNU8mAACAfEuCHitJMmFTXXRAQTUqnOdwAW16I1mELwB5WjhjldfVAhsgAgDBUEZY AR0AA4VXZNqZQcFFT+NINeqCNRHAPw/lRiqXHmjCAiDgQ0c0B7rhYhdwdK30eP/o4HR95WKy0Tf9 4wuvenc7JhDEIAM0sAIjcQPfg6fi8l7g4VED2mFYAzJl6VADCSgCAX9+hAoKp2KjUzrDgkBLAQMF VDKZEBcqRk2Klawx8GaV9qyahmHNRK2T42QepjkD0DmUcCNyGhCb4Ak3MgPsyjWeYB+QonLUASA1 8gqa0AtjM5BGNDK6IQO6RD2DU2k5cKe/NW1D4Ynm4jwN0GSWY2hR1q8ZQJHDAiFDByVjJ00F9w/Z EC9cQjoQKggoMAJIEjsaSziWRq/QykSqgX+OUzzI4zyTI0ZOJmiGhjmaAwAGMGUZkAF/OBwqMBwh wAIn8IcZUFwKMAAG0GgKULL/sDMwkwa0zso+/zlzUSqlZDB9Gphn5qIBzCM5fVayC7C3eytGfks5 fPtoZnu2sjM7b0Y43OM9HgulbmtHqudujzBqojQ8lEs8xXO5mFu5hLM9FLY+RmaBjeu21eZr5cNe mHZr8TO0oUtnUlC6qva67INppysFdhYuqru6GVQ/5hO3wRZs6fO6t2a7tgs+0Ia7GNRpqvZpwpY/ ZnBsWMgvcPCjXOMHLtQBLeYBzLYDzxZtxit45HM+wWZzlmYDLPNBAaMzfGNuJScLRBcChNC97KZB G4Q/3NMGJLBw6KslARcR1hBNfqQ2tQBDn1AJl4BDLWUJQ2NB8ButpMu7kVu//x5Uct1woMl5TKJF QJLCDwpkCddVA/iwCXqDE/OIESSgwAucBMj7aeKLheu5XH30ELsQQMKQDTFSUNsgcCEFf9zqwaMS EBDFC6rVcLxovL6TvMHTQW56BykgET6xHzkZJzMgdPhwK3Kwc/bwAj6UYqGgCtOAGyLkQ9uVMtWF EQ4Hv98rcWmQbaJyLPbwb3BUAbI6DQL0Ctr1Am8xo6fCU9CZvohVxUMEAVUFJHLcKIkKA7dLbe/T CK0xajlAHtEAJl3MQ8bCYylACSwEmt+AM+wBRmcohah1ASuryY8iMv1gWP+iMHFxE/YGIz04xPX6 O/ejBjJQK1VMbr1ZcJbQE//nqxsxpKuMihZYoQEZoAIX8K97MKs6cR7lwRZnth4yt2vye8QV9ywW YQrYaQcpBES6ERVkNJ2UWEag4mIdUBMx0hOYYA1w8wpc8ywS1mrKgMYKcQOgqAeZanVOTB1fuglW Ky1O9XasaVpzl4WpgglzyhQV4L/Q0s7HC8sT1yEWKQIEtLCgIEim2M9ZQRY8QANgsAIWIEb+fIpW gaPBGmLwZ7NLMiBzYFneC0qLrBD3VAnTQB1x0A8+hAcNt4cgnQAKEA5PEIMEgAAUUDwx8AgT0EvF R6bikGA34ndMSQ0MZSezSm3Sl0fPxFLWR00AYX0jcp7gfFINAC5FYwILwQP/J2EX5cJ5k3pS72Cm ywUQWMa/r3AjyeS4oARFN+BX5ooHpnkHtveUSC0O6QfYE2AkUgoeJqAALQHMw0lJOIoHIFgvMcJG gBd9FxNUrodPZ6JyTqEw9JFFhRR3OaXTFLBITEC5I+DRT/lPu3oAHQoK9kYHpLcwpvfMiPA7UOR6 cBJ68YKhN8JPQ/rRC6rTDWAGYBBcJPEBiD2A/Vww1IVwxoSpGbeSSMQdt3tHcqsXEHMH1LQLjpkR 6LlXCjABHbtIpH0DKyAWkaTci+0RzCMYWhoRcWoJ1M3AwnWvr3cymeAHEGCzCDKma1qDO80DJjDa i1RL4DFUgf2SfAhM4jAB/z5Sw0RkqxOyAfNtf+1z3fctp73gNnUSEJZQn6X1y52x02a9rCSRPVBj Amit4Dl9IidgNzjxl2EDxEi0KgYBSvcaAwsZcF+CG1kyIkh31Op3AOHtA6+TggBQALVEAAZwgI4x AYnN4stNFQdQlpzQPxXAl7sIuiiMgRm2gUGUx5lYNvwU5KY1LZA0AELQOmruZ0LQAA4gBA6wt+to gjEZRxaxNhtgHxEuB/J047UJNXvhITNSCtNbiN/8kdSSThFxAn75l7TowThAAvdRA94UIjPgASGC AwYm5f7kIDuDqT5xLXXQATKQaRjoGi7gWUsSR6hSG4LR6TCp6IcoCgDhwf/pBCK5Tg27Xk7ntOsz oHTqfYqVGVI8bleB5Mp66ipHO+h2cOs9sWNbpgLs+NdVYeZK9xug7RKqXectror7SQ30YMA1zuVG UN8p3pzHuVUp0AlI6JFQ+RIeQIrUC53Tm1T4nu/6nlRcIyM1sKjD/huLeIkBM5XfWgEqMGdicK+/ 142uCArXJOLImADtZwk7WhEH5Y3agGUOkAtafpW0aI3h4O00o2DTuCJqmQSmak8qQnUtBQKdXoMe MR8xYsfkdEz1UAre5QD+4I2sNSMzoEWpbYLiUOw4WwkbQJJ6mmHmwgIHQnCecGMS0KFpaBV3qQ/Y MiOJtzN+9EPUIBAAIjL/0TQjbgQBjhfwMBEqV8lTSu8DrWGbGsKBbDhHFRACOB3aJxJQIhCborD1 5qENAAL4jFl2ZB9HfHD2aN8RVSUH36TVI2kh8PVR3nhR+/SQdZko7gRNOypQuEE6b8EfYXOPu6KR e20HiJ/45iCQnHApEOJTRuk4GgNSrc8iCGTmD1haFY9RzukHYkYyGimXACsBYimRRO9X1oUHbW+S CUkBcm+rSvFydGD3v8yO7kRyLQwhtF8gpR9Swy+A3+7zTzEHyZ9ZG6IkJxQ2DCVZ3d+ZhymTywX+ pgNNGikKzShb6z/0BDh3DNkLIYT8FpJZQHB5sDoSCScFqSwlGIxEpDkk/6hVa2KKvV49IOMX9EpV JGRzmcyZ4dhtXOprJqNJl60Wn9VbL6Tyug1mBk5iw8YHMVHRR4fGZWVEaMSDiUNFJaWkpKUEAoME 724v9CrEy2hJM+XpC60MpETF7S1VRbNFpLWi7i6PajQrweOpwnOzZW7JYwexZzFR5yYGUuOhgaXM tQxphsxDg/RX3HfLNA4jhaOEw/WMTLaNpbIFQwQERKWlpgYDgncL2LhgDChV2GDG0wwY2UI4e6Yo WgwXJqo1QJGrSY0S/VLgaIHmxChyAascMMdkQ4sULU4lI4OhRiB3UFqQ2MQu2y5wV0iKFLYBQiwM ZER8RINBxsNFESdqoP/QgMIJJnPWgIDAoVgJCyMFdq3ioQQqCfdUiCgxU0JHNjP6nQFjD6ccEju9 kqyigUQFDC/EHkmijJlDpTpySFzx4akCFBuygWDT4oUKMWU8TKh7WZyFgmU2bsCwMVsTQG7YojID gkNqNEsqhOSJOdgBEqzUckpRuhAMH4KV8shBY1qkBgsaIEMDQQLyCmo6YQhREjbAAyqYoLNXIl3O TTHXznyJWvUcCR3sxI6O5cAJjkmMgWbScLfSRDyYUkzch4kKGGxqtOAg4olPrOiplwMmyGssDjZA bQMAkwHkBe9Os+eeg1ABxTyufAmBHQ4gW6uEe9BYhjf5evDNkcMuGA7/gRCKaGIhI9CRLEBQoCMH oF88YKyvZI5gAwY5SnjhrJyMzMkDC4I5L4uT7JkDAxa6kVG3EpU6sb6KFDDAxb44W4OfMkLYCrMB xyGBR+9eeEOszxxUoSVdsonixhsDYiCEfmABYYYXQPisJQyq7MHKZwhFMbgVF0CAS5zUeIwDCBwj xoIMCPSqijzl5ECj0Mi4BwPUSiBhjNDE6sBGkQjUjIwScHgBCVhmYOslFnzggVD5nuHBN8MQa2DL AbrUKywznJghrEJCYOBSnxJAMydbcjolVA7qgcUeAM86AwQPmBznpBIOKgFMTFiL8sRcdV2E1ywT M0AAF+VoYk0c/jSu/wIPQmh2HC086GCJNM/4rwLUKqAQBBEKBkGOC8r7NoELQkiDHs/IkPQjMjaA 4URcCzXxxBykcWGEihgdIANK/sBBBQlmqMGSMJcIga5L87Bg4jjOSCEFEXz+2WfscJHxBMv41cIC 9choAQeFa4ABAxVKI6MDGXj1eF1DD/1NIoqs2VKABiYuBoRVWEvuhaklCCGDMu0U5oJ5ZXRigw1S 4yDhe8z4BuIDNND0CBUg2GCN0l4gprUddNCBV3Wz3tW3kb0G1oABBMgA4DJaAKoCprvBgB46VGAA x9fw8OACVnQ+28cK8FqyWQ8yIEYCFWLC19UkytiYhxsYJ/TjrJ3hVf/krp2i3PIGZjfiUdw28Kgv DnhZ8u0B++DRtJkw+MYnkpLOHIpVJPBvjVWw32WHG3zn9XFdnem4vl8XtTyAlOcQIR0QYopRPFQ2 mIt0psvQARhQh6nkpAMqMFrp9iAx8DUBMoLAwaygMIO4VK0wN8hB49q3LuDRZ2SQEMICwCaAy6ls G4jLiArQkawyYKADNAsgjmCXALyIYAMZCIFl+uUTiaUuGSmA2hf2Mq6MLQGDMYjB+rDWQfcdijDA WYF9WDSAAQTgcggykj3W8BE/vSB0qIBhCOowAerV0HR3YMAF9NWBobjECHyKyeEgAIHbsKICHYDB DVwQAxqsz3FO9OD/rSJnmEh8rXICCAAAIrA8otRABFfBQZCsggEc9Cd0LimYB05wgrlcwAIzhA4D JmABDXAyBGBhQhw8BD05tIATImBDspQhg2n0UYONC6Qgn9gurk3kAyMMliIBsADMQakFfYLSBCFo hkF4aXWskYM0kdMK2pHLXhXYliuww45kbOAEMnhEH2mQA8Y1kZcdPBQIlTjFXwELAZYjZiOxEprP TNAtmHDlDPQ5A5XcQ0Fv/I7daIcBZHkiJk/oIpFMMxY5bCAE4hzBCsiZS3SmU5DrFFmKTBDMrzHK hAFYZCPB5wnxaROWTIsQE9bEGOq87BVQ40cdOZGNNeHEkjPICD/g/7iNcK5AAyagqB+Z+D6MptMh Gh3ZREr2FBLGk36LVEDK6omGEihMfzXIhiX5gooa9EmryCkBd3BQLCgwswxlbQKc3LEBD8CABcH8 gFAres6LHhWjHwQhcB7RUSEMRwEnU+QiAaCACPxrKNZ8QivDyAGPeEIEEZqBVYIypS8URVqeMogK WICCalBAAxN1ATnNqcvg4RWphCTMUqeogb/Cs3JRFWlhI5BKN64yOdPEwN0CdARrGWmVeumAB1jA gkgQ5wEX0MAHVjDUP9oVeKiVrqEQcbUc/PIRI/iAU6zx1JPJU6SLDMAAFlBbEnjgXyCwmBP0sgT2 GgQEw/UACTobAvAKLEoBDWjAAyhwgQ9M1LkaPGd0p1vgh+SqXdEAjmEgEUwKWAOwCGBUbK1oQguH F8MYtrCFrWgAAyBAAQogzn77+1+6VrS0uGqGgVkMso7RZ6MSGe0UteuwB+sXsCGWsIQ93GMfe3jH IRYxjh/AX+XOtbmjVaKAz7mb07YYyk7W6+JiLOPm0ni7rqXAlouMYy9/uchb7q8GljsCEwiVon0k qjkHTOAov3mQwHsxYUR2gwXL+BHNFaqZR9BnP//5zGhO8mjJSYM/svlqco4PnBn9uKRK+Wr0obP6 7HxnJV4a05kGzh81yGa7NvHJjX5GEAAAOw== ------=_NextPart_000_010D_01C0F7CA.D992B9A0-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 18 09:12:10 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id JAA22954; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 09:11:03 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 09:11:03 -0700 Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20010618110752.0297c1a8 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 12:10:50 -0400 To: vortex-L eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: Patent filing ritual / consumer safety law example In-Reply-To: <5.0.2.1.2.20010617160954.0293e0f8 pop.mindspring.com> References: <008c01c0f690$bf97e420$69181ad8 oemcomputer> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <"fqGwn3.0.Tc5.MWYBx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43219 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: I wrote: "You are not allowed to deliberately obfuscate or hide knowledge. When you fill in a patent application, you must swear sign a Declaration under penalty of perjury that you are not hiding relevant information." I mean you raise your right hand and swear, and then you sign a Declaration. I once saw this colorful ritual. "Penalty of perjury" means that lying in the application is equivalent to lying while giving testimony during a trial. I doubt anyone is ever prosecuted for this; it is like lying about you sex life in a deposition -- only three people has been prosecuted for that in the last 100 years, and two of them were serious cases of assault involving a doctor and a minister. But if the patent becomes valuable, a commercial rival is bound to find out you lied. The judges will rule against you, and you will lose patent protection. > > Plus the unit will come apart in many sealed pieces if you > >try to open it. Have fun trying to figure out how to reassemble Because it > >will be designed not to work if opened.. > >You would never be allowed to sell this machine in North America, Europe >or Japan for commercial or consumer use. Health and safety laws would >forbid it. I mean you cannot sell heavy equipment which is not safety certified and which cannot be safely opened and maintained. The manual has to show how to take apart and repair the machine without risk. The owner has a right to open, inspect and repair his own property, although the manufacturer may warn that only a licensed repairman should work on the machine. Read the instructions for a water heater, furnace or automobile engine for examples. Some electronic equipment has a seal and a label: "No user maintainable parts. Warrantee void if this seal broken." Such statements are of dubious legality. I have not seen that kind of seal in many years, and I doubt it would hold up in court. Carey's notion that you would be allowed to sell heavy machinery which self-destructs when it is opened up is a childish fantasy. Many crackpot inventors have this idea. Some devices such as computer chips, electronic watches and nicad batteries are factory sealed and will self-destruct when opened. But this cannot be helped. It is not deliberately engineered. These are small machines, and the engineering details for all of them are in the public domain -- by law -- and made available to any consumer or poison control organization. See: http://hazard.com/msds/h/q259/q189.html EVEREADY BATTERY -- ENERGIZER - BATTERY, NONRECHARGEABLE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET NSN: 6135013391232 Manufacturer's CAGE: 83740 Part No. Indicator: A Part Number/Trade Name: ENERGIZER Item Name: BATTERY, NONRECHARGEABLE Company's Name: EVEREADY BATTERY CO INC Company's Street: CHECKERBOARD SQ Company's City: ST LOUIS Company's State: MO Company's Country: US Company's Zip Code: 63164 Company's Emerg Ph #: 216-835-7368 Distributor/Vendor # 1: QUADTECH INC (800-253-1230) Distributor/Vendor # 1 Cage: 0PK96 Record No. For Safety Entry: 001 Tot Safety Entries This Stk#: 002 Status: SE Date MSDS Prepared: 24SEP92 Safety Data Review Date: 31OCT92 Supply Item Manager: CX MSDS Serial Number: BPFNC Hazard Characteristic Code: N1 Unit Of Issue: EA Ingredients/Identity Information Proprietary: NO Ingredient: MANGANESE DIOXIDE Ingredient Sequence Number: 01 Percent: 0 - 15 NIOSH (RTECS) Number: OP0350000 CAS Number: 1313-13-9 OSHA PEL: 5 MG MN/M3 CEILING ACGIH TLV: 5 MG MN/M3 Other Recommended Limit: NONE RECOMMENDED . . . If a toddler or a dog breaks opens up a nicad and swallows the contents, someone at the emergency 800 number will know what to do. Before Carey's machine is sold, similar information about it must be made available. Any sane group of people with children will insist on this, especially the Amish. Their elected authorities are careful to review the environmental, health and social impact of machines before allowing members to use them. In that respect, they were 200 years ahead of society. In modern society, you are not allowed to keep secrets about consumer products. Hard line capitalists and conservatives may object to these consumer protection laws as being too obtrusive, and revealing too many corporate secrets. The secrets would be revealed anyway with reverse engineering. The number of children poisoned in the last 30 years has fallen by 1 or 2 orders of magnitude depending on the cause. I do not see why anyone would object to laws that save hundreds of lives every year at no cost to society. - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 18 09:39:21 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id JAA03232; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 09:37:38 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 09:37:38 -0700 Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20010618121537.02972008 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 12:37:00 -0400 To: vortex-l eskimo.com, , etimes@teleport.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: Re: Other Hyrogen fuel In-Reply-To: <006901c0f7ff$ec8a9480$c5181ad8 oemcomputer> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <"gkWp71.0.Qo.HvYBx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43220 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: I explained that I have not "debunked" anything here. I merely reported my exchange with Jack Carey in detail, quoting him verbatim as closely as I can remember. Bruce Meland responded: > Still Sounds similar to Park's tactics No, Bruce, it does not. Please stop making blanket statements without evidence. Here is a partial list of the differences between Robert Park and me: 1. I listed Jack Carey's e-mail address (in the message header). If he had not supplied his telephone number here already, I would have done so. Park never gives his readers a way to contact the people he critiques. 2. I quoted Carey exactly and in detail, both what he wrote here, and what he said on the telephone. I give the reader every opportunity to see what the author himself claims. Park never quotes anyone directly. He paraphrases, deliberately distorts and ridicules the author. 3. Carey has not published anything as far as I know, but if he had you can be sure I would list the author, title and publication. I ALWAYS provide footnotes. Park never does. 4. I cross-check every fact, and make no assertion not backed up in the textbooks. Park makes up facts as he goes along, and he broadcasts ignorant nonsense such as the claim that you can measure magnetic field strength by putting sheets of paper between a magnet and a vertical metal surface. 5. I read as much as I can about a subject before commenting on it, and that includes these claims of over-unity electrical machines. Park brags that he has never read a paper about cold fusion. 6. Park always puts theory ahead of experiments. I put experiments first, but Carey says he has not performed experiments or measurements in the usual sense of the word. He relies upon subjective impressions such as how bright the lights are. In short, there is a world of difference between Park and me. If you continue to make this empty accusation, you will only reveal how ignorant you are, so I suggest you shut up. - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 18 09:46:10 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id JAA06091; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 09:42:51 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 09:42:51 -0700 From: Hypercom59 aol.com Message-ID: <5a.1735f83e.285f8965 aol.com> Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 12:42:13 EDT Subject: Carey is correct about only "two" statements. To: vortex-l eskimo.com CC: JCarey9622 aol.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 5.0 for Windows sub 124 Resent-Message-ID: <"fEGVK.0.xU1.B-YBx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43221 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Dear Group, Carey states; (The Plasma Fusion guy is me) I do give people like him a bad name - simply put, while they "May" have something - "I DO" have testable prototypes and it tends to give those "without" - A BAD NAME. Wayne (the inventor?), I do sympathize for your radiation poisoning and whatever else is wrong with both of you (besides your spelling) - but please leave me out of it. They are after $20,000,000 from a well known free energy investigator and feel the need to slam my work in an attempt to keep me from getting their money. Wayne's ideas were obtuse, incoherent and his understanding of plasma was, well - unfathomable. He has discovered how to generate a room temperature solid "Solar Flare" that will loose it's magnetic properties at 20deg below zero - "WOW". Furthermore - when this material is smashed and all the pieces crumble away - the magnetism will still be there!!!!! That not only took my breath away - but catalyzed the end of that conversation.... To the unnamed investigator - PLEASE, see what they have to offer FIRST. Carey also states, No arrogant attitudes, only respect............ Speechlessly stunned, Chris Arnold From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 18 11:02:48 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id LAA06452; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 11:01:11 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 11:01:11 -0700 Reply-To: From: "Keith Nagel" To: Subject: RE: Fw: Reply to Jed from Jack Carey Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 14:07:14 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <5.0.2.1.2.20010618102731.02951e50 pop.mindspring.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Importance: Normal Resent-Message-ID: <"qLNzM1.0.fa1.d7aBx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43222 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Jones writes: >Perhaps Carey would get a little more respect from his target audience >(the Dennis Lee crowd) if he opts for the always popular diversionary >tactic of the meaningless mantra - how does "phase conjugation" grab you? And Jed replies: Great! It has a linguistic ring, and an antique, Victorian touch. Keith hollers: ARGHHHH! This was exactly my point in my parable for Bruce. Do either of your KNOW what phase conjugation is? Let me guess, you know it because Bearden spouts off about it ad nauseum. So when you hear it, you think "Oh, more of Beardens spouting, not worth the trouble". We may agree about the spouting, but about phase conjugation nothing could be further from the truth. I'm not here to educate, merely to point a finger and say "look here". Read the optics texts, then try applying the basic idea to the low freq. range. Having built several devices which embody this concept, I can tell you that it's work knowing more about. FORGET YOU EVER HEARD ABOUT BEARDEN and read the literature. But of course, no one does. The best way to discredit an idea is to become a zealot advocate of it. I sometimes wonder, at my most paranoid moments, if the oil companies aren't PAYING people like Tom to go around doing this. But then I think, "No, the world is full of such people who'd gladly do the job for free". K. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 18 11:37:45 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id LAA19336; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 11:36:14 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 11:36:14 -0700 Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20010618142656.00a93248 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 14:35:27 -0400 To: vortex-L eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: OFF TOPIC: Will ride in Cirrus SR20 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <"iv0W82.0.0k4.TeaBx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43223 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: The flight school / pilot service downstairs recently acquired a new type of airplane, a Cirrus SR20. See: http://www.cirrusdesign.com In a couple of weeks, after they get insurance, I will take a ride in it. I will bring a camera and write a short article about the experience, although I do not know much about small airplanes. I have flown in them six times. People who know something about small airplanes may want to e-mail me suggestions as to what I should look for. The Cirrus design is revolutionary in many ways. It was described in the New York Times magazine, in an article available at the manufacturer's web site. The airplane cruises at 19 miles per gallon, and it features simplified controls and advanced electronic instruments that reportedly make it easier to fly. (I wouldn't know.) The entire airplane is equipped with a parachute for a worst-case emergency. The inside is luxurious and quiet. I think this technology may bloom if cold fusion or some other anomalous energy source can be perfected, and air traffic control can be improved. This is more ambitious than my last reports on new vehicles, in which I described an electric scooter and an electric bicycle. (The bicycle has now gone 900 miles, by the way.) I feel a lot more comfortable with a bicycle, although it is probably more dangerous than the airplane. I should cage a ride in a hybrid electric car. I have heard it feels the same as any car, except it is quieter with less-than-average pickup. It could not have less pickup than my 1994 Metro, which is unhappy climbing large hills with the air conditioning on. - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 18 11:37:47 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id LAA19386; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 11:36:22 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 11:36:22 -0700 Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20010618142309.02940fa8 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 14:26:39 -0400 To: vortex-L eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: RE: Fw: Reply to Jed from Jack Carey In-Reply-To: References: <5.0.2.1.2.20010618102731.02951e50 pop.mindspring.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <"AuAQw1.0.ik4.beaBx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43224 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Keith Nagel wrote: >And Jed replies: >Great! It has a linguistic ring, and an antique, Victorian touch. > >Keith hollers: >ARGHHHH! This was exactly my point in my parable for Bruce. Do >either of your KNOW what phase conjugation is? Let me guess, >you know it because Bearden spouts off about it ad nauseum. No, sorry, I did not know that it meant anything. I thought it was a fancy sounding made-up term. I had no intention of ridiculing or debunking an actual concept. - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 18 12:06:31 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id MAA31177; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 12:05:04 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 12:05:04 -0700 Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 12:01:40 -0700 From: Jones Beene Subject: RE: Reply to Jed from Jack Carey To: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-to: jonesb9 pacbell.net Message-id: <0GF500C1D3L3FC mta5.snfc21.pbi.net> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Opera 5.11 build 904 Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Resent-Message-ID: <"eLCfs2.0.3d7.W3bBx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43225 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Keith hollers: >ARGHHHH! This was exactly my point in my parable for Bruce. Do >either of your KNOW what phase conjugation is? Let me guess, >you know it because Bearden spouts off about it ad nauseum. >So when you hear it, you think "Oh, more of Beardens spouting, >not worth the trouble". Hey Keith, Relax... The original point (as you begrudgingly surmise) is not to "dis" a legitimate field of inquiry but only to demonstrate that the universe is filled with any number of overworked malapropisms which often are tossed out there only to substitute for real understanding - or at least to attempt to disguise a lack of real results, i.e. like when your rock solid 500% OU device can't self-power and you don't really understand what C.O.P. means, then it may be expedient to just fly off on some other obfuscation. Maybe I should have used one those other fine universal elixirs, like "degenerate semiconductor," but somebody on the list probably thinks that's a pretty hot topic too. >Read the optics texts, then try applying the basic idea to the low freq. >range. Having built several devices which embody this concept, >I can tell you that it's work knowing more about. OK. I'll bite. I know about phase conjugation in optics. And I've read enough of Bearden's stuff for two lifetimes. It's the free energy aspect that is over my head... like rigorously, man ;-) And I would very much like to hear more on this forum about real experiments and particularly about the details of those experiments that point to anomalies etc. So please, consider this a segue to explain your work with phase conjugation. Next time I'll try to choose a more apt candidate for "meaningless mantra." Regards, Jones -------- End of forwarded message -------- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 18 12:59:12 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id MAA22715; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 12:57:46 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 12:57:46 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Sender: mjones pop.jump.net Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 14:52:07 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Mitchell Jones Subject: Re: An interesting anomaly Resent-Message-ID: <"pvg8J.0.pY5.vqbBx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43226 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: >In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Sun, 17 Jun 2001 23:19:29 >-0900: > >>At 9:49 PM 6/17/1, Dean T. Miller wrote: >> >>>What's more likely is that your switch is being affected by the >>>humidity, and not turning fully off. There's probably some kind of >>>corrosion in the switch that the humidity affects and presents a path, >>>albeit a high resistance, for the power. The lower voltage (it's >>>still AC and still going through the ballast) is what's keeping the >>>tube feebly glowing. >> >>A very good possibility, more likely I would guess than my suggestion of a >>possible short to ground. This is easily checked by measuring the output >>voltage of the switch (relative to ground) when the switch is damp. > >Neither of these suggestions explain the travelling waves (bands of >light and shade) in the tube (though these did disappear more or less >after the tube had been removed from its holder and put back in again). >The wavelength of the bands was about 5-8 cm (hard to say exactly >because they were moving). ***{The emission wavelengths for the elements that are listed in the *Handbook* are limited to the range from the vacuum ultraviolet to the far infrared, and so the wavelength you observed, above, isn't going to appear there. Oddly, 21 cm is the wavelength of emission/absorption of monoatomic, neutral hydrogen, and 7 cm is its 2nd subharmonic. But since this is a standing wave, it would beat at the 1st subharmonic, not the 2nd. If hydrogen is the source, that would give a beat wavelength of 10.5 cm. Could your measurement have been off by that much? If not, then doubling the mean of the range you cited suggests that the wavelength of the parent signal should be around 13 cm. Note that this is a long microwave wavelength, and can only be rendered visible to you if microwave emissions from your fluorescent tube are so intense that they are exciting the phospor--a circumstance which seems rather unlikely to me. Of course, maybe I'm wrong about that. There is no doubt that intense microwaves will light up a fluorescent tube: see http://hochwald.tripod.com/fluoro/index.html , for example. In pursuit of that hypothesis, I mucked around for awhile trying to find the RF emission frequencies of mercury vapor, without luck. If you also cannot find this info, I suggest you find a radio receiver that can pick up f = c/w = 3x10^10/6.5 = 4.62 GHz. Since that falls just above the UHF band, you will need an SHF receiver to detect it, which is likely to be expensive. Thus I suggest that you borrow or rent, rather than buy. If you obtain such a receiver, hold it next to your fluorescent tube while you are seeing the standing waves, and search about in the vicinity of 13 cm. If you hit a strong signal which goes away when the tube ceases to glow, you can reasonably conclude that what you are seeing is a standing wave caused by RF emissions within the tube. Given that outcome, I would then replace your present on-off switch with a variable resistance switch, so that you can turn the current down to low levels without turning it completely off. My guess is that you will be able to induce the standing wave at a low current level, but will not be able to do so with the tube turned completely off. That will lay to rest your evident suspicions that there is a source of "free energy" within the tube. By the way, if your fluorescent is churning out microwaves that are this strong when only subject to a leakage current, it might be a good idea to shield it with some foil while you are playing with it, especially when it is turned fully on. (Is it possible that whenever we use fluorescent lights, we are frying outselves with microwaves? Surely not!) --Mitchell Jones}*** >Nevertheless these are indeed likely explanations. I'll see if I can >measure a voltage between earth and the lamp, with the switch turned >off. > > >Regards, > >Robin van Spaandonk > >http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ ________________ Quote of the month: "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value--i.e., zero." --Voltaire From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 18 13:18:01 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id NAA31517; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 13:17:29 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 13:17:29 -0700 Message-ID: <002a01c0f829$19dc7600$4f181ad8 oemcomputer> From: "Bruce Meland" To: , Cc: Subject: Re: Reply to Jed from Jack Carey Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 12:01:35 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Resent-Message-ID: <"OzmSP.0.Ni7.O7cBx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43227 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Dear Vortexians and other wizzards and any doubting Thomas types in the western Ohio - Detroit area, I will pick you up friday eve and go find out about this technology. Bring your meaursing devices. Or for that matter any one that wants to fly in to Detroit this weekend i will pick you up and take you to the wizzard. Hey Jed why don't you fly in this weekend. On a fact finding mission. Bruce Meland PS I did make a similar offer 10 days ago but no response. -----Original Message----- From: Jones Beene To: vortex-l eskimo.com Date: Monday, June 18, 2001 12:07 PM Subject: RE: Reply to Jed from Jack Carey >Keith hollers: > >>ARGHHHH! This was exactly my point in my parable for Bruce. Do >>either of your KNOW what phase conjugation is? Let me guess, >>you know it because Bearden spouts off about it ad nauseum. >>So when you hear it, you think "Oh, more of Beardens spouting, >>not worth the trouble". > >Hey Keith, > >Relax... The original point (as you begrudgingly surmise) is not to "dis" a >legitimate field of inquiry but only to demonstrate that the universe is filled with >any number of overworked malapropisms which often are tossed out there only >to substitute for real understanding - or at least to attempt to disguise a lack of >real results, i.e. like when your rock solid 500% OU device can't self-power >and you don't really understand what C.O.P. means, then it may be expedient >to just fly off on some other obfuscation. > >Maybe I should have used one those other fine universal elixirs, like >"degenerate semiconductor," but somebody on the list probably thinks that's a >pretty hot topic too. > >>Read the optics texts, then try applying the basic idea to the low freq. >>range. Having built several devices which embody this concept, >>I can tell you that it's work knowing more about. > >OK. I'll bite. I know about phase conjugation in optics. And I've read enough >of Bearden's stuff for two lifetimes. > >It's the free energy aspect that is over my head... like rigorously, man ;-) > >And I would very much like to hear more on this forum about real experiments >and particularly about the details of those experiments that point to anomalies >etc. So please, consider this a segue to explain your work with phase >conjugation. > >Next time I'll try to choose a more apt candidate for "meaningless mantra." > >Regards, > >Jones > > > > >-------- End of forwarded message -------- > > > > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 18 13:43:37 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id NAA09925; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 13:42:19 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 13:42:19 -0700 X-Originating-IP: [209.249.70.202] From: "Mark Goldes" To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: OFF TOPIC: Will ride in Cirrus SR20 Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 13:41:43 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Jun 2001 20:41:43.0711 (UTC) FILETIME=[15AFDAF0:01C0F837] Resent-Message-ID: <"ux16U2.0.uQ2.gUcBx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43228 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status:

There is a great cover story in the current Atlantic Monthly that includes an unusual perspective on the Cirrus SR20.  It is an extract of a book by Jim Fallows that is due to be published in the next few days.

Mark Goldes, Magnetic Power Inc., Room Temperature Superconductors Inc.

>From: Jed Rothwell
>Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
>To: vortex-L eskimo.com
>Subject: OFF TOPIC: Will ride in Cirrus SR20
>Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 14:35:27 -0400
>
>The flight school / pilot service downstairs recently acquired a new
>type
>of airplane, a Cirrus SR20. See:
>
>http://www.cirrusdesign.com
>
>In a couple of weeks, after they get insurance, I will take a ride
>in
>it. I will bring a camera and write a short article about the
>experience,
>although I do not know much about small airplanes. I have flown in
>them six
>times. People who know something about small airplanes may want to
>e-mail
>me suggestions as to what I should look for.
>
>The Cirrus design is revolutionary in many ways. It was described in
>the
>New York Times magazine, in an article available at the
>manufacturer's web
>site. The airplane cruises at 19 miles per gallon, and it features
>simplified controls and advanced electronic instruments that
>reportedly
>make it easier to fly. (I wouldn't know.) The entire airplane is
>equipped
>with a parachute for a worst-case emergency. The inside is luxurious
>and quiet.
>
>I think this technology may bloom if cold fusion or some other
>anomalous
>energy source can be perfected, and air traffic control can be
>improved.
>
>This is more ambitious than my last reports on new vehicles, in
>which I
>described an electric scooter and an electric bicycle. (The bicycle
>has now
>gone 900 miles, by the way.) I feel a lot more comfortable with a
>bicycle,
>although it is probably more dangerous than the airplane. I should
>cage a
>ride in a hybrid electric car. I have heard it feels the same as any
>car,
>except it is quieter with less-than-average pickup. It could not
>have less
>pickup than my 1994 Metro, which is unhappy climbing large hills
>with the
>air conditioning on.
>
>- Jed
>


Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 18 13:48:39 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id NAA11887; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 13:47:49 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 13:47:49 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <001501c0f7fc$5989db80$c5181ad8 oemcomputer> References: <001501c0f7fc$5989db80$c5181ad8 oemcomputer> Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 15:46:53 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: thomas malloy Subject: What I said about Dr. Lindermann Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Resent-Message-ID: <"e3Oa72.0.ev2.rZcBx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43231 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: There is a difference between a slam, ie comparing, Jed Rothwell to Robert Parks, and a legitimate commentary on someone who, IMHO, is full of B S. I wrote Dr. Lindermann an email in which I asked him if he had ever seen anyone heat water. I also asked some other technical questions. He ignored me. If the situation were reversed, and if I had the answer to the questions posed, I would tell the questioneer that the answers were in my book. Had he done so, I would have purchased a copy. Since Dr. Lindermann ignored me, I assume that he doesn't have any answers, and that his book is more rehash of what various F E researchers, none of whom, AFAIK, have been able to heat water, have asserted. During the International Tesla Society days, we used to refer to people who did this as having vaporware. As I've gotten older and more cynical, I've started to refer to this behavior as their being a B S artist, and that they are trying to blow smoke up my ass. You have to learn Bruce, to differentiate between a legitimate researcher who is interested in the theory of why and how thing work, and scam artists who are out to separate people from their money. This means people who are looking for investments in their technology and people like Dr. Linermann who are out to sell books. Further more I'm still upset about your comparing Jed to Robert Parks. Not content to comment about things that he knows something about, Dr. Parks has started attacking magnetic therapy and homeopathic healing, about which he knows nothing. It's like me commenting on aircraft design, about which I know almost nothing. Dr. Parks behavior absolutely infuriates me. I have been relived of water on the elbow by a homeopathic remedy. I have also seen people experience relief of symptoms, particularly pain, after using a magnetic therapy pad. Can I prove it? No, because as Dr. Parks would point out, 30% of the people will feel relief after taking a sugar pill, AKA,the placebo effect. But there is a body of knowledge with explanations for why they work, and many satisfied customers who will attest that both therapies worked for them. Another thing I want to mention. If I had a working F E machine and I wanted to keep people out of it, I would lease it to the customer on a cents per K W hour basis. If I had a machine that could deliver power, I could parallel it into the utility power supply and bill the customer. I would have no trouble financing such a machine either, anything that produces a monthly cashflow is financable. The bottom line, Bruce is that you are wasting your time, and lots of paper by giving press space to people who claim to have produced F E but are unable to heat water. I know of two investors who both own manufacturing businesses and would be able to invest $10,000,000 each if they saw a working F E machine. You can bet your last dollar, that I will not tell either of them about any alleged F E machine until I see it heat water, If I were to do otherwise, I would be doing what is call yanking their chain, which is a good way to destroy my professional creditability and the trust of the investor. ( Later ) Since I haven't posted this message yet, I'm going to continue. You have to realize Bruce, that when something is published that act gives a degree of credulity to the inventors claims. It is assumed that the editor has invested the time to investigate the claims. An editor who fails to do that will be out of business if he continues to print trash. The reason I'm spending all this time talking to you about this Bruce is because you have a publication and you owe it to your readers to confront people who make these claims of O U output to heat water. I assume that you want to remain in business, so you owe it to yourself and your investors too. >Have you tole this to the person that wrote this slam? > > >>Bruce, >>> >>>I think you would've been better off to have spent that $37.00 plus S & H >on a "Shrink". :-) > >> >>>Regards, Frederick >> >>I agree, I linked to Dr. Lindermann's site from Jerry Decker's site. >>I asked him some pointed questions. I have yet to receive a reply. >>Bottom line, anybody can write a book, but it takes a break through > >to heat water. >> > >>> I think you serious tinkerers would save a lot of time and money if you >>>> purchased the recent published book "The Free Energy Secrets of Cold >>> > Electricity by Dr. Peter Lindemann for about $37, includes shipping >and >> >> From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 18 13:48:41 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id NAA11862; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 13:47:48 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 13:47:48 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <5.0.2.1.2.20010617151026.00a8f650 pop.mindspring.com> References: <002e01c0f685$152fa0a0$69181ad8 oemcomputer> <5.0.2.1.2.20010617151026.00a8f650 pop.mindspring.com> Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 15:46:53 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: thomas malloy Subject: Re: Amish not luddites Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Resent-Message-ID: <"XJXir3.0.Av2.oZcBx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43230 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: >Keith Nagel wrote: > > >> I think the phrase >>Luddite might be more appropriate. > >Ihave great respect for their views about technology. They adapt >inventions which enhance their community values, such as off-grid >electricity, indoor plumbing, modern medicine, refrigeration for >diary farms and Cheerios breakfast cereal. They try out many new >technologies, and sometimes reject them years later, or modify them >in clever ways to avoid a negative impact on society (both theirs >and ours). I agree. I didn't realize that the Amish utilized off the grid electricity. > In the 1920s many of them used automobiles but later decided that >in most case most people should not have them. They make reasonable, >humane exceptions to their rules. They do not withdraw from the rest >of society or refuse to participate. They are quite different from >extremist fanatics on both ends of the spectrum. > >- Jed Their life style is based on a deep religious faith. Their lifestyle is probably quite close to the life we will have in the earth made new. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 18 13:48:44 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id NAA11778; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 13:47:37 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 13:47:37 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <5.0.2.1.2.20010617145918.00a8f650 pop.mindspring.com> References: <5.0.2.1.2.20010614162751.02947d28 pop.mindspring.com> <031e01c0f2cb$71f5f040$e2b4bfa8 computer> <5.0.2.1.2.20010614162751.02947d28 pop.mindspring.com> <5.0.2.1.2.20010617145918.00a8f650 pop.mindspring.com> Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 15:46:53 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: thomas malloy Subject: Re: Other Hyrogen fuel Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Resent-Message-ID: <"osd2a2.0.mt2.cZcBx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43229 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: >thomas malloy wrote: > >>Sorry to be a wet blanket for this energy source Jed, but hog >>manure is more valuable as a soil amendment than as energy. OTOH, >>you could spread it on the ground and grow industrial hemp which >>you then burn for energy. > >You can use it for both. First extract the methane, then use the >leftovers for fertilizer. > >In the U.S., industrial hemp production is widely prohibited because >of anti-marijuana laws. That's a darn shame. > >- Jed No you can't do that, What makes manure valuable as a soil amendment is the organic chemicals which result from fungal decomposition of the cellulose. Sorry about that, but that's reality. We're trying to get the laws against industrial hemp changed were in the land of 10,000 idiot liberals, Jessie the Gov is with us, but I don't suppose that big brother will tolerate it. Someone proposed building a series of railroad tracks going out in every direction from power plant. Biomass would be harvested in every direction and converted into energy. Now that I've relized that P V panels don't produce very much energy, I find this idea increasing appealing From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 18 14:00:41 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id NAA18068; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 13:59:10 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 13:59:10 -0700 Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20010618163128.00a93248 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 16:59:09 -0400 To: vortex-l eskimo.com, , From: Jed Rothwell Subject: Carey must show meaningful demo and provide read data first Cc: In-Reply-To: <002a01c0f829$19dc7600$4f181ad8 oemcomputer> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <"G12Km1.0.zP4.TkcBx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43232 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Bruce Meland wrote: >Bring your meaursing devices. . . . >Hey Jed why don't you fly in this weekend. On a fact >finding mission. I will not fly in unless the demonstration in the garage has been improved substantially from the time Ken Rauen saw it, or unless the original, small self-sustaining unit will be shown. The demonstration in it present state proves nothing, and you cannot bring in measuring devices that will reveal useful information. Okay, I suppose you could bring a full set of instruments and spend a week setting up and testing . . . Carey et al. must do two things: 1. The test must be reconfigured with standard instruments instead of by guess and by golly rough estimates. 2. A coherent description of the setup must be published on Internet, written by someone who knows the difference between amperage and horsepower. This presentation must be at least as good as a junior high school science fair project with a passing grade. Once that is done, various investors might be willing to go see the thing, including me. These are the rock-bottom minimum requirements. You cannot expect serious people to spend time and airfare to evaluate a project conducted by people who will not make any effort to explain themselves. The best and easiest thing to do would be to set it up in a self-sustaining arrangement. Despite Carey's claims, if the device is real this can be done in a few days at little or no expense. It does not require $20 million. He told me emphatically that it would require this amount, but that is nonsense. A self-sustaining demonstration combined with sale of 20 to 100 prototype machines at cost would bring in $20 million, $200 million, or $2 billion in venture capital if that is what they want. (Why they would want investment funds, I cannot imagine.) There is no reason not to set up this demonstration, and every reason to do it. If they refrain from doing it I will be forced to conclude they are deluded, crazy, or frauds. I can't tell which, and I don't care. The pathology of fruitcake inventors and criminals does not interest me. > Bruce Meland PS I did make a similar offer 10 days ago >but no response. You cannot expect a response. There is nothing here to respond to. Give us a bare minimum set of facts, in some kind of description. These people have been working for 10, 15 or 20 years -- depending on when you ask. Surely by now they had time to write down some particulars, and gather some performance data. As I said, a 7th grade science fair level will do. (Not to boast, but I have seen many science fair presentations and I am sure my daughters and every other kid in Chamblee High School could have run rings around Carey.) - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 18 14:22:20 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id OAA31047; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 14:21:44 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 14:21:44 -0700 Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20010618170238.02937cf8 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 17:21:49 -0400 To: vortex-l eskimo.com, vortex-l@eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: Re: Amish not luddites In-Reply-To: References: <5.0.2.1.2.20010617151026.00a8f650 pop.mindspring.com> <002e01c0f685$152fa0a0$69181ad8 oemcomputer> <5.0.2.1.2.20010617151026.00a8f650 pop.mindspring.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <"9k75q3.0.1b7.e3dBx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43233 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: thomas malloy wrote: >I agree. I didn't realize that the Amish utilized off the grid electricity. There are different sects, and maybe some do not. The ones in Lancaster, PA use off-grid electricity, especially dairy farmers, who must have refrigeration and pasteurization. There is a debate in the Amish community about pollution from Diesel generators. Unfortunately, central Pennsylvania does not have much wind, so off-net wind electricity is not an option. Small scale wind is not economical, anyway (but then neither is Diesel generation). >Their life style is based on a deep religious faith. Their lifestyle is >probably quite close to the life we will have in the earth made new. Then the earth will not be made new, because only a tiny fraction of people would live that way voluntarily. I wouldn't. To me, the idea of harvesting grain manually when we have machines to do it is worse than slavery. It is mindless, soul-destroying labor with no purpose, like digging holes and filling them up, or doing long division on paper instead of using a calculator. I am sure we can find a way to have our cake and eat it too: we will have technology without pollution. A plan to save the earth that depends on improving human nature is bound to fail. Mind you, I don't mind harvesting a half-acre garden of corn and tomatoes by hand! - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 18 14:44:35 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id OAA08274; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 14:44:02 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 14:44:02 -0700 Reply-To: From: "Keith Nagel" To: Subject: RE: Amish not luddites Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 17:50:08 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Importance: Normal Resent-Message-ID: <"dLooQ2.0.812.XOdBx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43234 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Hi. I'm curious about Jed's claim the Amish use off-grid electricity. Mostly what I find on the web suggests no electricity, but perhaps this is a bit like saying to be Jewish you don't eat pork. My guess is they cheat quite a bit (smile). I'm reminded of that old story about a man, a woman, and a piece of fruit. A little knowledge may be a dangerous thing. But every Vort should stand ready and willing to bite. http://www.ccps.org/ccps/wbl/kharkins/amish/electricity.html http://www.800padutch.com/amish.shtml K PS: My poor post has been reduced to one line, propagating endlessly around the vortex. No, the Amish are not Luddites as the two are separated by about 100 years and an ocean or two. The odds of selling either of them such a device as an experimental alt/energy machine are either vanishing or impossible, Amish and Luddite respectively. I mean, you may import and sell the best liquor in the world but a business plan including the opening of a chain of bars in Afghanistan may not make it. Despite the fact that "hidden" drinking occurs. -----Original Message----- From: thomas malloy [mailto:temalloy metro.lakes.com] Sent: Monday, June 18, 2001 4:47 PM To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Amish not luddites >Keith Nagel wrote: > > >> I think the phrase >>Luddite might be more appropriate. > >Ihave great respect for their views about technology. They adapt >inventions which enhance their community values, such as off-grid >electricity, indoor plumbing, modern medicine, refrigeration for >diary farms and Cheerios breakfast cereal. They try out many new >technologies, and sometimes reject them years later, or modify them >in clever ways to avoid a negative impact on society (both theirs >and ours). I agree. I didn't realize that the Amish utilized off the grid electricity. > In the 1920s many of them used automobiles but later decided that >in most case most people should not have them. They make reasonable, >humane exceptions to their rules. They do not withdraw from the rest >of society or refuse to participate. They are quite different from >extremist fanatics on both ends of the spectrum. > >- Jed Their life style is based on a deep religious faith. Their lifestyle is probably quite close to the life we will have in the earth made new. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 18 14:51:46 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id OAA10692; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 14:50:37 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 14:50:37 -0700 From: Robin van Spaandonk To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: An interesting anomaly Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 07:49:58 +1000 Organization: Improving Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id OAA10638 Resent-Message-ID: <"8-IBg1.0.nc2.jUdBx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43235 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: In reply to Mitchell Jones's message of Mon, 18 Jun 2001 14:52:07 -0500: [snip] >>Neither of these suggestions explain the travelling waves (bands of >>light and shade) in the tube (though these did disappear more or less >>after the tube had been removed from its holder and put back in again). >>The wavelength of the bands was about 5-8 cm (hard to say exactly >>because they were moving). > >***{The emission wavelengths for the elements that are listed in the >*Handbook* are limited to the range from the vacuum ultraviolet to the far >infrared, and so the wavelength you observed, above, isn't going to appear >there. Oddly, 21 cm is the wavelength of emission/absorption of monoatomic, >neutral hydrogen, and 7 cm is its 2nd subharmonic. [snip] The wavelength mentioned was not an electromagnetic wavelength. It was the wavelength of a longitudinal pressure wave in the plasma. As such, I suspect that the velocity of sound is the appropriate velocity, not the speed of light. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 18 14:59:00 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id OAA14088; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 14:58:24 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 14:58:24 -0700 From: Robin van Spaandonk To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: An interesting anomaly Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 07:57:44 +1000 Organization: Improving Message-ID: References: <9f6rits5so7c68biuj46k4e253l93phf23 4ax.com> <9f6rits5so7c68biuj46k4e253l93phf23@4ax.com> <3b46a39e.337753283@mail.midiowa.net> <4.2.0.58.20010618081121.00959a20@postoffice.swbell.net> In-Reply-To: <4.2.0.58.20010618081121.00959a20 postoffice.swbell.net> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id OAA14030 Resent-Message-ID: <"XvpBx2.0.qR3._bdBx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43236 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: In reply to Charles Ford's message of Mon, 18 Jun 2001 08:16:42 -0500: [snip] >>Not very likely. If anything at all gets into the fluorescent tube, >>the gas would be able to leak out and you'd get no light. > >Interesting except that the gas in the tube is at about 1/10 atmosphere >pressure. Leaky tubs gain gas rather then loose it. The increase of gas >raises the voltage needed to arc causing the tube to eventually >fail.. Moisture is unlikely to be able to enter or exit due to the size >of the molicule. Water molecules are actually no larger than either oxygen or nitrogen, however they may interact more with their environment because they are polar. [snip] Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 18 15:02:31 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id PAA16512; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 15:02:00 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 15:02:00 -0700 From: Robin van Spaandonk To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: An interesting anomaly Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 08:01:25 +1000 Organization: Improving Message-ID: <0busitcjf94oo0eesvnn7752qgq6ihfpb8 4ax.com> References: <4.2.0.58.20010618081821.00952ac0@postoffice.swbell.net> In-Reply-To: <4.2.0.58.20010618081821.00952ac0 postoffice.swbell.net> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id PAA16472 Resent-Message-ID: <"OdAyM2.0.v14.NfdBx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43237 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: In reply to Charles Ford's message of Mon, 18 Jun 2001 08:26:44 -0500: >Folks... There is no anomaly about afterglow with florescent tubes. The >coating is phosphorous. What I observed was at least 100 times stronger than normal afterglow. >There is also no anomaly about power off glow >which is caused by your wiring. When the switch is installed in the >neutral line rather then the hot a tube can glow depending upon the amount >of ground coupling. Which will very with humidity. [snip] If the switch is in the ground line, then I should be able to measure the full voltage on the fitting relative to ground, when the switch is off. I will try this. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 18 15:36:43 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id PAA00329; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 15:35:52 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 15:35:52 -0700 Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 15:33:37 -0700 From: Jones Beene Subject: Fwd: Re: An interesting anomaly To: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-to: jonesb9 pacbell.net Message-id: <0GF500C9FDEFSX mta5.snfc21.pbi.net> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Opera 5.11 build 904 Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Resent-Message-ID: <"6Wa7Z1.0.-4.79eBx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43238 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Robin van Spaandonk wrote: >Isn't the purpose of a starter to heat the filament, which is >essentially a hot cathode? No. A starter provides only a higher voltage needed for startup. Once a plasma has been initiated, resistance drops way off and the tube operates at a moderate voltage. There is no filament in a fluorescent, as in a hot cathode electron tube, or "valve" as the Brits like to say. Fluorescent electrodes are generally shaped like flat wedge. But then again, you are an Aussie, no? Maybe they do thing differently down under... but I doubt it, as you said it was 17 watts and that wouldn't be enough for a hot cathode device - as they are rather inefficient. BTW, did you try taking the face plate off of the switch and then giving the contacts a good spraying with a CO2 "duster" (preferable)or even WD40 (last resort). That should eleiminate the anomaly. But if not, send it to BLP for testing. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 18 17:37:50 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id RAA12111; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 17:37:08 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 17:37:08 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Sender: mjones pop.jump.net Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 19:35:13 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Mitchell Jones Subject: Re: An interesting anomaly Resent-Message-ID: <"-WBts3.0.Wy2.hwfBx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43240 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Robin wrote: >The wavelength mentioned was not an electromagnetic wavelength. It was >the wavelength of a longitudinal pressure wave in the plasma. As such, I >suspect that the velocity of sound is the appropriate velocity, not the >speed of light. ***{In order for you to observe it, it had to alter the brightness of the phospor. Electromagnetic waves can do that, but, insofar as I am aware, sound cannot. If you have evidence to the contrary, I would like to see it. --MJ}*** >Regards, > >Robin van Spaandonk > >http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ ________________ Quote of the month: "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value--i.e., zero." --Voltaire From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 18 17:37:51 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id RAA12071; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 17:36:59 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 17:36:59 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Sender: mjones pop.jump.net Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <0GF500C9FDEFSX mta5.snfc21.pbi.net> Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 19:33:33 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Mitchell Jones Subject: Re: An interesting anomaly Resent-Message-ID: <"gOYUP1.0.Xy2.hwfBx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43239 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Jones Beene wrote: >BTW, did you try taking the face plate off of the switch and then giving the >contacts a good spraying with a CO2 "duster" (preferable)or even WD40 (last >resort ***{It could be *literally* Robin's "last resort." The reason: WD40 may be an excellent conductor of electricity, and is beyond a doubt highly flammable. Why do I say that? Because a friend of mine, about 20 years ago, sprayed WD40 inside his car radio in an attempt to remove an accumulation of dust. Result: it immediately began to crackle and fizz, and then burst into flames! My advice: do *not* spray anything with WD40 if live electrical contacts may be present. In the worst case scenario, Robin gets electrocuted, and, in the best case, the switch catches on fire. --Mitchell Jones}*** ). That should eleiminate the anomaly. ***{And Robin as well. :-) --MJ}*** >But if not, send it to BLP for testing. ________________ Quote of the month: "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value--i.e., zero." --Voltaire From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 18 18:11:42 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id SAA25212; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 18:09:34 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 18:09:34 -0700 Message-Id: <3.0.6.32.20010219210943.0079bcf0 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.6 (32) Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 21:09:43 -0500 To: vortex-L eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: PA Amish use of electricity Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Resent-Message-ID: <"n1ZDM3.0.V96.CPgBx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43241 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Here is a book with a short but good description of the Amish use of electricity and compressed air tools: L. Niemeyer, D. Kraybill, "Old Order Amish," (Johns Hopkins U. Press, 1993), pp. 66 - 70, 151. The list of devices they do and not allow is thought-provoking. It seems arbitrary until you learn about their philosophy and social policy. This book covers the community around Lancaster, PA; other communities may have different rules. The rules "vary considerably by settlement, affiliation and district." For example, a small group in South Carolina I visited runs a restaurant using mains electricity. I do not think there is a central ruling authority. Allowed: off-grid electricity, mainly from Diesel with some solar panels. Warning lights on buggies, flashlights, electric lights for older people or people with bad eyesight, electric welding, power saws, refrigeration, pasteurization, electric cattle fences, some blenders and other kitchen equipment, washing machines, automatic milkers, electronic cash registers, digital scales, calculators, credit card readers with modems, medical and veterinary equipment. Compressed air is preferred for hammers, hydraulic lifts, and other heavy factory equipment, just as it is in most automobile repair shops. Air driven kitchen blenders and other equipment is used. Not Allowed: mains electricity, clothes dryers, hair dryers, dishwashers, air conditioners, VCR, television, general purpose computers. Radio and telephones are used emergencies and work (weather and crop reports). Diesel and gasoline engines are common. You often see horses drawing farm wagons with gasoline powered threshers on board, reminiscent of the large 19th century McCormick horse drawn threshers and later steam driven threshing machines in the U.S. and England. - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 18 19:27:31 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id TAA24748; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 19:26:07 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 19:26:07 -0700 X-Apparently-From: Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.20010618212712.00996510 postoffice.swbell.net> X-Sender: cjford1 pop.mail.yahoo.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58 Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 21:29:19 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Charles Ford Subject: Re: An interesting anomaly In-Reply-To: <0busitcjf94oo0eesvnn7752qgq6ihfpb8 4ax.com> References: <4.2.0.58.20010618081821.00952ac0 postoffice.swbell.net> <4.2.0.58.20010618081821.00952ac0 postoffice.swbell.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <"l37rv2.0.U26._WhBx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43242 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Robin: The florescent tube does not completely short during discharge. it actually dumps off to about 100V so you will more likely find something on the order of 20VRMS Also the impedance is very high so use a digital... or even better a VTVM if you have one. At 08:01 AM 6/19/01 +1000, you wrote: >If the switch is in the ground line, then I should be able to measure >the full voltage on the fitting relative to ground, when the switch is >off. I will try this. Charlie Ford KC5-OWZ cjford1 yahoo.com cjford1 swbell.net _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 18 19:52:44 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id TAA01897; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 19:51:43 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 19:51:43 -0700 Message-ID: <000701c0f860$2a622d80$27191ad8 oemcomputer> From: "Bruce Meland" To: Cc: Subject: Re: What I said about Dr. Lindermann Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 18:35:45 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Resent-Message-ID: <"MFj-I.0.PT.-uhBx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43243 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Tom I have the book by Lindeman. Yes it is a little spendy but before i pass judgement iw will run it by some motor wizzards(The work of Ed Gray is mainly what he covered). I doubt if he will even break even on this book even if he answered each email and got a order from each reply. It appeares he spent a lot of time researching Gray and his cold electricity technology. Bruce -----Original Message----- From: thomas malloy To: vortex-l eskimo.com Date: Monday, June 18, 2001 1:49 PM Subject: What I said about Dr. Lindermann >There is a difference between a slam, ie comparing, Jed Rothwell to >Robert Parks, and a legitimate commentary on someone who, IMHO, is >full of B S. I wrote Dr. Lindermann an email in which I asked him if >he had ever seen anyone heat water. I also asked some other technical >questions. He ignored me. > >If the situation were reversed, and if I had the answer to the >questions posed, I would tell the questioneer that the answers were >in my book. Had he done so, I would have purchased a copy. Since Dr. >Lindermann ignored me, I assume that he doesn't have any answers, and >that his book is more rehash of what various F E researchers, none of >whom, AFAIK, have been able to heat water, have asserted. During the >International Tesla Society days, we used to refer to people who did >this as having vaporware. As I've gotten older and more cynical, I've >started to refer to this behavior as their being a B S artist, and >that they are trying to blow smoke up my ass. You have to learn >Bruce, to differentiate between a legitimate researcher who is >interested in the theory of why and how thing work, and scam artists >who are out to separate people from their money. This means people >who are looking for investments in their technology and people like >Dr. Linermann who are out to sell books. > >Further more I'm still upset about your comparing Jed to Robert >Parks. Not content to comment about things that he knows something >about, Dr. Parks has started attacking magnetic therapy and >homeopathic healing, about which he knows nothing. It's like me >commenting on aircraft design, about which I know almost nothing. Dr. >Parks behavior absolutely infuriates me. I have been relived of water >on the elbow by a homeopathic remedy. I have also seen people >experience relief of symptoms, particularly pain, after using a >magnetic therapy pad. Can I prove it? No, because as Dr. Parks would >point out, 30% of the people will feel relief after taking a sugar >pill, AKA,the placebo effect. But there is a body of knowledge with >explanations for why they work, and many satisfied customers who will >attest that both therapies worked for them. > >Another thing I want to mention. If I had a working F E machine and I >wanted to keep people out of it, I would lease it to the customer on >a cents per K W hour basis. If I had a machine that could deliver >power, I could parallel it into the utility power supply and bill the >customer. I would have no trouble financing such a machine either, >anything that produces a monthly cashflow is financable. The bottom >line, Bruce is that you are wasting your time, and lots of paper by >giving press space to people who claim to have produced F E but are >unable to heat water. I know of two investors who both own >manufacturing businesses and would be able to invest $10,000,000 each >if they saw a working F E machine. You can bet your last dollar, >that I will not tell either of them about any alleged F E machine >until I see it heat water, If I were to do otherwise, I would be >doing what is call yanking their chain, which is a good way to >destroy my professional creditability and the trust of the investor. > >( Later ) Since I haven't posted this message yet, I'm going to >continue. You have to realize Bruce, that when something is >published that act gives a degree of credulity to the inventors >claims. It is assumed that the editor has invested the time to >investigate the claims. An editor who fails to do that will be out of >business if he continues to print trash. The reason I'm spending all >this time talking to you about this Bruce is because you have a >publication and you owe it to your readers to confront people who >make these claims of O U output to heat water. I assume that you want >to remain in business, so you owe it to yourself and your investors >too. > >>Have you tole this to the person that wrote this slam? >> >> >>Bruce, >>>> >>>>I think you would've been better off to have spent that $37.00 plus S & H >>on a "Shrink". :-) >> >> >>>>Regards, Frederick >>> >>>I agree, I linked to Dr. Lindermann's site from Jerry Decker's site. >>>I asked him some pointed questions. I have yet to receive a reply. >>>Bottom line, anybody can write a book, but it takes a break through >> >to heat water. >>> >> >>> I think you serious tinkerers would save a lot of time and money if you >>>>> purchased the recent published book "The Free Energy Secrets of Cold >>>> > Electricity by Dr. Peter Lindemann for about $37, includes shipping >>and >>> >>> > > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 18 20:11:22 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id UAA10003; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 20:10:50 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 20:10:50 -0700 Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 19:18:57 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: An interesting anomaly Resent-Message-ID: <"YCimn1.0.0S2.wAiBx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43244 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 3:33 PM 6/18/1, Jones Beene wrote: >Robin van Spaandonk wrote: > >>Isn't the purpose of a starter to heat the filament, which is >>essentially a hot cathode? > >No. A starter provides only a higher voltage needed for startup. Once a plasma >has been initiated, resistance drops way off and the tube operates at a >moderate voltage. There is no filament in a fluorescent, as in a hot cathode >electron tube, or "valve" as the Brits like to say. Fluorescent electrodes are >generally shaped like flat wedge. Jones, it sounds like you are confusing commercial high voltage flourescents, which are high voltage cold cathode tubes, with ordinary low voltage (120 V) home flourescent lights, which have filaments at both ends that are heated by the starter before voltage is applied across the tube. The current is then regulated by balast and the filament heated by the through-tube current. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 18 20:42:19 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id UAA21467; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 20:40:35 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 20:40:35 -0700 From: dtmiller midiowa.net (Dean T. Miller) To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: An interesting anomaly Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 03:40:15 GMT Organization: Miller and Associates Message-ID: <3b30c888.12069765 mail.midiowa.net> References: In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.5/32.452 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id UAA21445 Resent-Message-ID: <"rgNWt.0.LF5.ociBx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43245 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: On Mon, 18 Jun 2001 18:09:03 +1000, Robin van Spaandonk wrote: >Neither of these suggestions explain the travelling waves (bands of >light and shade) in the tube (though these did disappear more or less >after the tube had been removed from its holder and put back in again). >The wavelength of the bands was about 5-8 cm (hard to say exactly >because they were moving). The bands you see within the tube are the normal plasma fields shuttling around. You don't seem them when the tube is in normal operation because the light output is too great. The easiest way to recreate the effect is to connect the fluorescent to a Variac, start the tube and then reduce the voltage. A voltage below about 40 volts will "quench" the plasma, but just above that voltage you'll see the plasma. (I have several battery operated fluorescents that display the same effect when the batteries run low -- Radio Shack has a really nice, pocket size unit that puts out a goodly amount of light. I use them for our normal power outages.) -- Dean -- from (almost) Des Moines -- KB0ZDF From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 18 20:59:40 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id UAA28244; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 20:57:10 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 20:57:10 -0700 From: dtmiller midiowa.net (Dean T. Miller) To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: An interesting anomaly Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 03:56:29 GMT Organization: Miller and Associates Message-ID: <3b31ccde.13180091 mail.midiowa.net> References: In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.5/32.452 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id UAA28210 Resent-Message-ID: <"w2ib-3.0.Ev6.LsiBx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43246 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Hi Horace, On Mon, 18 Jun 2001 19:18:57 -0900, hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) wrote: >Jones, it sounds like you are confusing commercial high voltage >flourescents, which are high voltage cold cathode tubes, with ordinary low >voltage (120 V) home flourescent lights, which have filaments at both ends >that are heated by the starter before voltage is applied across the tube. >The current is then regulated by balast and the filament heated by the >through-tube current. The filaments are turned off once the plasma is ignited. The filaments serve only to vaporize the mercury inside the tube which, once vaporized, remains vaporized due to the running current (the filaments cool off). -- Dean -- from (almost) Des Moines -- KB0ZDF From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 19 01:25:52 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id BAA10211; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 01:24:23 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 01:24:23 -0700 From: Robin van Spaandonk To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: An interesting anomaly Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 18:23:49 +1000 Organization: Improving Message-ID: <7v2uitcvash31tdc3rum9uvu2puhq93jgi 4ax.com> References: <3b30c888.12069765@mail.midiowa.net> In-Reply-To: <3b30c888.12069765 mail.midiowa.net> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id BAA10155 Resent-Message-ID: <"e21L_1.0.SV2.tmmBx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43247 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: In reply to Dean T. Miller's message of Tue, 19 Jun 2001 03:40:15 GMT: >On Mon, 18 Jun 2001 18:09:03 +1000, Robin van Spaandonk > wrote: > >>Neither of these suggestions explain the travelling waves (bands of >>light and shade) in the tube (though these did disappear more or less >>after the tube had been removed from its holder and put back in again). >>The wavelength of the bands was about 5-8 cm (hard to say exactly >>because they were moving). > >The bands you see within the tube are the normal plasma fields >shuttling around. You don't seem them when the tube is in normal >operation because the light output is too great. [snip] Thanks Dean, this make sense, though I would have expected them to be more irregular. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 19 02:36:24 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id CAA25382; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 02:36:01 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 02:36:01 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: eskimo.com: billb owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 02:35:56 -0700 (PDT) From: William Beaty To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Ball-lightning conference Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Resent-Message-ID: <"b36AL2.0.HC6.0qnBx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43248 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: ISBL7 is coming up july 26-30 in St. Louis. Abstracts (by author) are available at http://home.wxs.nl/~icblsec/ http://home.wxs.nl/~icblsec/pg_abstracts.html ((((((((((((((((((((( ( ( ( ( (O) ) ) ) ) ))))))))))))))))))))) William J. Beaty SCIENCE HOBBYIST website billb eskimo.com http://www.amasci.com EE/programmer/sci-exhibits science projects, tesla, weird science Seattle, WA 206-789-0775 freenrg-L taoshum-L vortex-L webhead-L From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 19 06:06:58 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id GAA10914; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 06:06:26 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 06:06:26 -0700 Message-ID: <3B2F4D4E.76584145 informatics.net> Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 08:02:06 -0500 From: Jon Flickinger X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "vortex-L eskimo.com" Subject: Fwd: Re: An interesting anomaly Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"rUAJg3.0.Qg2.HvqBx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43249 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Hi Jones, Robin and all, Flourescent lamps are divided into two general catagories, that is, instant start (cold cathode) and rapid start (hot cathode). The instant start variety contains no filaments, is easily identified by single pins on each end and depends soley on high voltages and a suitable ground plane for starting. The rapid start types on the other hand, do contain filaments, and are started in a variety of ways. Certain rapid starts are also designed to be instant started. When using the older coil type ballasts with rapid start lamps, the filaments are left "on" close to the voltage and current level specs of the manufacturer. Some electronic ballasts also leave the filaments "on" but at reduced levels, and some cut off filament current altogether after start-up. Some compact rapid start lamps use a bi-metal "starter" to initialize the arc and then cut out to eliminate filament current. These are the lower wattage lamps used in "down" lighting, drop lights, incandescent replacements, etc. Regards, Jon Jones Beene wrote: > Robin van Spaandonk wrote: > > >Isn't the purpose of a starter to heat the filament, which is > >essentially a hot cathode? > > No. A starter provides only a higher voltage needed for startup. Once a plasma > has been initiated, resistance drops way off and the tube operates at a > moderate voltage. There is no filament in a fluorescent, as in a hot cathode > electron tube, or "valve" as the Brits like to say. Fluorescent electrodes are > generally shaped like flat wedge. > > But then again, you are an Aussie, no? Maybe they do thing differently down > under... but I doubt it, as you said it was 17 watts and that wouldn't be enough > for a hot cathode device - as they are rather inefficient. > > BTW, did you try taking the face plate off of the switch and then giving the > contacts a good spraying with a CO2 "duster" (preferable)or even WD40 (last > resort). That should eleiminate the anomaly. > > But if not, send it to BLP for testing. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 19 06:44:03 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id GAA21290; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 06:43:25 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 06:43:25 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Sender: mjones pop.jump.net Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <3b30c888.12069765 mail.midiowa.net> References: Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 08:41:39 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Mitchell Jones Subject: Re: An interesting anomaly Resent-Message-ID: <"gzv0L3.0.aC5.yRrBx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43250 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: >On Mon, 18 Jun 2001 18:09:03 +1000, Robin van Spaandonk > wrote: > >>Neither of these suggestions explain the travelling waves (bands of >>light and shade) in the tube (though these did disappear more or less >>after the tube had been removed from its holder and put back in again). >>The wavelength of the bands was about 5-8 cm (hard to say exactly >>because they were moving). > >The bands you see within the tube are the normal plasma fields >shuttling around. ***{I assume you are talking about the magnetic fields that are associated with the alternating current. If so, what process causes the loops of flux around the current flow to bunch up in such a way as to produce the alternating bands that Robin described? Also, even if they do bunch up, how could they possibly be strong enough to affect the brightness of the phospor? I find it impossible to imagine how photons emitted from the center of a fluorescent tube could be so strongly diverted from their paths as to produce bands of darkness on a surface that is less than 1 inch from their points of origin. It is far more likely, in my view, that it is photons travelling parallel to the tube, rather than perpendicular to it, that are producing the effect. Such photons, if in the long microwave bands, would beat at about the wavelengths that Robin observed. --MJ}*** You don't seem them when the tube is in normal >operation because the light output is too great. > >The easiest way to recreate the effect is to connect the fluorescent >to a Variac, start the tube and then reduce the voltage. A voltage >below about 40 volts will "quench" the plasma, but just above that >voltage you'll see the plasma. (I have several battery operated >fluorescents that display the same effect when the batteries run low >-- Radio Shack has a really nice, pocket size unit that puts out a >goodly amount of light. I use them for our normal power outages.) > >-- Dean -- from (almost) Des Moines -- KB0ZDF ________________ Quote of the month: "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value--i.e., zero." --Voltaire From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 19 10:21:03 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id KAA07990; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 10:20:07 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 10:20:07 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: eskimo.com: billb owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 10:18:43 -0700 (PDT) From: William Beaty To: freenrg-l eskimo.com Subject: Interdimensional lost & found In-Reply-To: <20010619033015.22735.qmail web10604.mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Resent-Message-ID: <"Ya79j1.0.hy1.7duBx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43251 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Boy, I had a doozy today. Reality-slippage big time. Picking up my daughter, the usual toxic fight with my ex started up. (If a guy alone in the forest says some words, and no spouse is around to hear them, is he still wrong?) :) I'd just received back one of my truck keys from her, which I then used to drive home to pick something up. I left the key in the ignition because I didn't want to lose it. When I got back to the truck, the key was GONE. Not in the slot. Not in my pockets (but I KNOW I left it there and didn't put it in a pocket.) But I was really steaming, so I suspected that this was a case of "disappearing objects" triggered by strong emotions. Since I was pissed at my ex, and she'd had that key for years, it certainly was could be acting as an emotional focus. So this morning I was thinking about this while coming home from shopping. Checked all my pockets again. Walked into the house while musing on the idea that human beings could be "natural sorcerers," although remaining in deep psychological denial because of the positivist/materialist belief system. The key might not be in this universe anymore. Where is it going to end up? But 'vanished' objects often seem linked to their owners, and mysteriously return later, unlike objects misplaced in the more usual way. As my eyes tracked across the kitchen, my nonverbal thought was: "clearly it wasn't 'stolen by the little people' or anything; a lower level of myself flicked the key out of spacetime in disgust, but since *I* did that, *I* should be able to retreive it again." As that thought appeared, my eyes landed on the key, sitting in the middle of a clear space on the kitchen table. ((((((((((((((((((((( ( ( ( ( (O) ) ) ) ) ))))))))))))))))))))) William J. Beaty SCIENCE HOBBYIST website billb eskimo.com http://www.amasci.com EE/programmer/sci-exhibits science projects, tesla, weird science Seattle, WA 206-789-0775 freenrg-L taoshum-L vortex-L webhead-L From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 19 10:45:43 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id KAA19033; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 10:45:06 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 10:45:06 -0700 Message-ID: <3B2F8FED.46726DF9 bellsouth.net> Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 13:46:21 -0400 From: Terry Blanton X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Interdimensional lost & found References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"SimyF1.0.4f4.X-uBx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43252 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: William Beaty wrote: > As that thought appeared, my eyes landed on the key, sitting in the middle > of a clear space on the kitchen table. Ah, a clear step toward gnosis! Next time, Neo, take the blue pill. ;-) Terry From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 19 10:49:14 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id KAA20634; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 10:48:46 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 10:48:46 -0700 Reply-To: From: "Keith Nagel" To: "Vortex" Subject: Neutrinos have mass Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 13:54:53 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Importance: Normal Resent-Message-ID: <"_6gwy2.0.K25.z1vBx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43253 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Hi All. As we've been flooded by, shall we say, fanciful descriptions of "nutrino" physics on this list, I'd like to point folks to some remarkable actual science in that field. http://www.sno.phy.queensu.ca/sno/first_results/ Seems that neutrinos DO have mass, and that funky flava changin' theory is to some degree proved out. How about that? K. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 19 10:57:44 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id KAA24313; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 10:57:10 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 10:57:10 -0700 Message-Id: <3.0.6.32.20010220135724.0079b710 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.6 (32) Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 13:57:24 -0500 To: vortex-L eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: OFF TOPIC PA Amish use of electricity Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Resent-Message-ID: <"4HckZ3.0.jx5.s9vBx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43254 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: [This may be COPY 2 of this message.] Here is a book with a short but good description of the Amish use of electricity and compressed air tools: L. Niemeyer, D. Kraybill, "Old Order Amish," (Johns Hopkins U. Press, 1993), pp. 66 - 70, 151. The list of devices they do and not allow is thought-provoking. It seems arbitrary until you learn about their philosophy and social policy. This book covers the community around Lancaster, PA; other communities may have different rules. The rules "vary considerably by settlement, affiliation and district." For example, a small group in South Carolina I visited runs a restaurant using mains electricity. I do not think there is a central ruling authority. Allowed: off-grid electricity, mainly from Diesel with some solar panels. Warning lights on buggies, flashlights, electric lights for older people or people with bad eyesight, electric welding, power saws, refrigeration, pasteurization, electric cattle fences, some blenders and other kitchen equipment, washing machines, automatic milkers, electronic cash registers, digital scales, calculators, credit card readers with modems, medical and veterinary equipment. Compressed air is preferred for hammers, hydraulic lifts, and other heavy factory equipment, just as it is in most automobile repair shops. Air driven kitchen blenders and other equipment is used. Not Allowed: mains electricity, clothes dryers, hair dryers, dishwashers, air conditioners, VCR, television, general purpose computers. Radio and telephones are used emergencies and work (weather and crop reports). Diesel and gasoline engines are common. You often see horses drawing farm wagons with gasoline powered threshers on board, reminiscent of the large 19th century McCormick horse drawn threshers and later steam driven threshing machines in the U.S. and England. - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 19 11:16:36 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id LAA02616; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 11:15:56 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 11:15:56 -0700 Message-ID: <3B2F96E7.80F15A77 suite224.net> Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 14:16:07 -0400 From: "Francis J. Stenger" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Win95; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Interdimensional lost & found References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"LacPd.0.oe.RRvBx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43255 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: William Beaty wrote: > > Boy, I had a doozy today. Reality-slippage big time. Interesting, Bill! I have another theory: Working on my Lathe of late, I have often noticed this phenomenon - I use the toolpost wrench and lay it down in a handy spot on the bench. After some related activity, I again look for the wrench. I scan the bench and the wrench is not in "my" sight. I look around the shop at other sites and, then, back at the bench. The wrench is there!! Theory: Tools we use often have images stored in our minds - perhaps in multiple copies. Some of these images are reversed in "polarity" by the internal manipulations of our brains. Now and then, when we look for the object, our mind registers the positive incoming image and overwrites a negative image already in the register. The result is an "image blank" If we come back for a second look, the image is properly resistered and all is reality... :-) Now, if this makes sense, I'll work up an explanation for Jed on the close relationship between amperage and horsepower, etc. another :-) Frank Stenger From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 19 11:24:49 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id LAA07154; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 11:24:17 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 11:24:17 -0700 Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20010619141700.0293b928 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 14:21:34 -0400 To: vortex-L eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: OFF TOPIC Test message - Amish electricity - WD-40 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <"V_zJA2.0.il1.GZvBx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43256 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Testing 1, 2, 3 . . . Is my Eudora messed up? Is this message dated Feb. 20? Anyone, for those who are interested I twice posted a message about an anthropology book that discusses the Amish social policy regarding electricity. They use credit card readers with modems but not computers. My messages came out with the wrong date and were swept into the past . . . The can of WD-40 warns it is flammable, but as far as I know once it dries the residue does not conduct electricity. I think it is often used to clean circuit boards and battery contacts. - JR From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 19 11:41:50 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id LAA17816; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 11:41:08 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 11:41:08 -0700 Message-ID: <000101c0f8e4$ce955920$e2181ad8 oemcomputer> From: "Bruce Meland" To: , "Jed Rothwell" Cc: , Subject: Re: Other Hyrogen fuel Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 10:19:26 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Resent-Message-ID: <"Zf11K2.0.IM4.3pvBx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43257 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Yes I agree with you mostly of what you stated below, and I appologize for a rather curse statement. I just wanted to get a point across. It is a tendency for peer reviewers to jump to conclusions perhaps because they have not been given all the facts about the invention or are not wiling to gather all the information and facts like Park. I am guilty of not giving all the facts about the neutrino voltaics technology because the 2 inventors who have the technology are not about to reveal all the details due to patent or confidentiality reasons to potential investors. And Jack has not given you all the facts about their technology. Like some cold fusion patent applications the neutrinovoltaics patent applications have been denied and supression tactics used. But hopefully future PO procedures and supression tactics will subside for the bettermant health of the people and planet earth. I know some of my comments about black heilocopters and Swat Team raids on inventors sound a little far fetched but it is a reality. I have heard too many reports from various inventors over the past 10 years. I plan on reporting some of the details in our next issue. In the latest issue of Atlantis Rising(Fighting for Alien technology by John Kettler) Jack Shulman, CEO of American Computer Co., ACC, who developed the transfer capacitor, TCAP, which operates at 12-THz , ran a 4-function breadboard programable 50 Thz calculator.(50 trillion hertz) and allows storage densities of 90 gigabytes. ACC decided not to get a patent because it would reveal too much to competitors. Lockeed and ATT are in pursuit and perhaps have done some backengineering on some of their TCAP's installed in a few notebook computers. And it is suspected Lockeed has incorporated perhaps a version of the TCAP in their TransAtmospheric Warfighter. ATT with all its power essentially shut down ACC's business for a while and it's many Web Sites due to the bankruptcy of North Point Communications(ACC's provider) along with 600,000 Northpoint DSL subscribers. ATT now claims the TCAP as it's own. The forced disconnect disrupted ACC only briefly, but now ACC alleges the New Jersey Mafia is supressing them by extortion and theft by buying computers and not paying for them. According to ACC the mafia gets supression jobs perhaps form large corp's like ATT and IBM. A story was written in the Jan 8th, 2001 San Francisco Chronicle and printed on line at www.AmericanMafia.com about their power. ACC is barely holding its own because it has not revealed all it's trade secrets and in spite of super advanced covert and overt attacks by big commercial rivals and government interference. More details can be obtained from CompAmericaOnline.com Web sites: www.aliensci.com and www.roswellinternet.com and of course get the Jul-Aug, 2001 issue No. 28 of Atlantis Rising for the complete story and check out www.antlantisrising.com Bruce ----Original Message----- From: Jed Rothwell To: vortex-l eskimo.com ; vortex-l@eskimo.com ; etimes@teleport.com Date: Monday, June 18, 2001 9:37 AM Subject: Re: Other Hyrogen fuel >I explained that I have not "debunked" anything here. I merely reported my >exchange with Jack Carey in detail, quoting him verbatim as closely as I >can remember. Bruce Meland responded: > >> Still Sounds similar to Park's tactics > >No, Bruce, it does not. Please stop making blanket statements without >evidence. Here is a partial list of the differences between Robert Park and me: > >1. I listed Jack Carey's e-mail address (in the message header). If he had >not supplied his telephone number here already, I would have done so. Park >never gives his readers a way to contact the people he critiques. > >2. I quoted Carey exactly and in detail, both what he wrote here, and what >he said on the telephone. I give the reader every opportunity to see what >the author himself claims. Park never quotes anyone directly. He >paraphrases, deliberately distorts and ridicules the author. > >3. Carey has not published anything as far as I know, but if he had you can >be sure I would list the author, title and publication. I ALWAYS provide >footnotes. Park never does. > >4. I cross-check every fact, and make no assertion not backed up in the >textbooks. Park makes up facts as he goes along, and he broadcasts ignorant >nonsense such as the claim that you can measure magnetic field strength by >putting sheets of paper between a magnet and a vertical metal surface. > >5. I read as much as I can about a subject before commenting on it, and >that includes these claims of over-unity electrical machines. Park brags >that he has never read a paper about cold fusion. > >6. Park always puts theory ahead of experiments. I put experiments first, >but Carey says he has not performed experiments or measurements in the >usual sense of the word. He relies upon subjective impressions such as how >bright the lights are. > >In short, there is a world of difference between Park and me. If you >continue to make this empty accusation, you will only reveal how ignorant >you are, so I suggest you shut up. > >- Jed > > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 19 11:50:45 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id LAA22081; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 11:50:02 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 11:50:02 -0700 Reply-To: From: "Keith Nagel" To: Subject: RE: OFF TOPIC Test message - Amish electricity - WD-40 Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 14:56:03 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <5.0.2.1.2.20010619141700.0293b928 pop.mindspring.com> Resent-Message-ID: <"KetPD.0.nO5.OxvBx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43258 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Hi Jed. Thanks for the Amish info, seems the overriding theme is "disconnect from the outside world" which as a side effect includes most technology. The more I think about this, the more I understand why Bruce's contact would attempt to market to this group. I am reminded of Joe Newman and Stan Meyers, both of whom marketed to fundamentalist christian sects. A good way to avoid those pesky linear educated types. Also, what you're thinking of is contact cleaner spray, which is mineral oil. Spraying WD40 into electronics is a poor idea. If a circuit needs real cleaning, more than what you can do with compressed air, consider acetone. But for a light switch? Use the contact cleaner. K. -----Original Message----- From: Jed Rothwell [mailto:jedrothwell infinite-energy.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 2:22 PM To: vortex-L eskimo.com Subject: OFF TOPIC Test message - Amish electricity - WD-40 Testing 1, 2, 3 . . . Is my Eudora messed up? Is this message dated Feb. 20? Anyone, for those who are interested I twice posted a message about an anthropology book that discusses the Amish social policy regarding electricity. They use credit card readers with modems but not computers. My messages came out with the wrong date and were swept into the past . . . The can of WD-40 warns it is flammable, but as far as I know once it dries the residue does not conduct electricity. I think it is often used to clean circuit boards and battery contacts. - JR From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 19 12:32:44 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id MAA07768; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 12:32:14 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 12:32:14 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: rick mail.highsurf.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <3B2F96E7.80F15A77 suite224.net> References: <3B2F96E7.80F15A77 suite224.net> Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 09:31:48 -1000 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Rick Monteverde Subject: Re: Interdimensional lost & found Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Resent-Message-ID: <"Bfb9-2.0.Gv1.zYwBx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43259 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Frank - >Theory: Tools we use often have images stored in our minds - perhaps >in multiple copies. Some of these images are reversed in "polarity" >by the internal manipulations of our brains. Now and then, when we >look for the object, our mind registers the positive incoming image >and overwrites a negative image already in the register. The result >is an "image blank" If we come back for a second look, the image >is properly resistered and all is reality... :-) Reality: As we age, our brains turn to goop. :-) - Rick Monteverde Honolulu, HI From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 19 13:05:08 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id NAA20494; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 13:01:43 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 13:01:43 -0700 Message-ID: <000401c0f918$595d6c40$1f1c99ac default> From: "Thomas D. Clark" To: "vortex" , "prj" Cc: "Thomas D. Clark" Subject: A Constitution: based on Ether Energies for all living Beings Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 16:33:57 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3612.1700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3612.1700 X-Apparently-From: ConexTom aol.com Resent-Message-ID: <"AjItv.0.405.c-wBx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43260 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: A Constitution: based on Ether Energies for all living Beings The following article discusses a constitution based on the universal ether energies for all living beings. The following topics will be detailed: Preamble for the Constitution, Branches of Government, Parliament & Leadership Models & Elections, Basic Rights of Each Citizen or Living Being, & Universal Ether Resonance's from which Universal Laws may be derived to outline the best parameters and ranges of parameters of the constitution. Preamble: All living beings come from and share the natural energies of the universal ether. The universal ether is tuned to natural harmonies & resonance's in nature which encourage living beings to live a happy life by providing access to sufficient quantities of natural energies which are tuned to the resonance patterns of the biological, psychological, social, and spiritual energies of each living being. Mechanical energies or imbalances in nature which are not tuned to the natural energies of the universal ether can create unhappiness and prevent access to sufficient quantities of natural energies. In order to maintain a harmonious balance in nature to guarantee the best quality of life for all living beings, the universal ether and living beings may set up universal and local laws and governments.. The best set of universal laws or rights which preserve the natural energies of life, liberty, and happiness are the basic rights of sufficient access for all living beings to the natural energies or resources such as privacy and security of food, shelter, clothing, information or knowledge, health, & environment for each individual and community. Communities of living beings may setup local laws which preserve their community. Each living being in a community has a responsibility to preserve the local laws of the community and universal laws of all living beings in order to live a happy life. Communities may set up governments and social customs which encourage living beings to be responsible citizens of a community. The best set of governmental laws and structures for a local community to establish which encourage responsible citizens are multipolar and decentralized power structures which harmonize the social , & economic, and environmental relations of living beings and their communities with the local and universal laws of a community and the natural ether. Each of the 4 Branches of Government may be as follows: 1.Executive (Leadership & Policies & Administration of Government) 2.Judicial (Interpretation and Enforcement of Laws) 3.Legislative (Creation and maintenance of Laws) 4.Ethical (Counsel, Encouragement & Documentation of History & Social Customs, Manners, & Culture) Each branch may be decentralized under the following classes of scope: Universal International Global National Local State Local Community or City Local Business Citizen Parliament Members from each of the 4 branches of government should attend parliament to centralize parlimentation but each branch of government and each parliament should be decentralized for each community (Universal, International, National, State, City, etc.) as much as possible. Structure of Leadership & Election of Leaders 1. 3 Top Executives for each Leadership Position rather than one top executive 2. Leaders may be elected by vote to represent communities of citizens for each leadership position by internet web ballot for advanced technological societies by ballot boxes for all others. Issues may be voted on by internet by each citizen and each leader may review the votes and then decide for the best action to take or vote on in the parliament for advanced technological societies. Basic rights of each citizen & community by class of rights to preserve privacy & security (Military, Police, Intelligence, Justice, Arms) for each citizen & type of community: 1.Freedom of assembly of communities & citizens 2.Responsibility of citizens to other citizens, community & preservation of resources - merit or demerit System to maintain responsibility of citizens 3.Freedom of Access to, Types of , and Purchase of Resources Access to Resources (Transportation & communications) Types of Resources Living Being Ether Energy (Spirit, Mind, Body, Environment) Spirit, Mind, & Body Energy Thoughts, Emotions, Feelings, Dreams, Memes, Genes, Myths, History, Culture, & Arts Environmental Ether Energy Technological or Mechanical Energy Natural Energies Ecology Atmosphere Food, Water & Agriculture Shelter & housing Products (clothing, Technologies) Employment Information or knowledge (Science, technology, education, Standards) Health Hospitals Arms (Self Defense, Force Fields, Energy) 4.Creation, preservation, maintenance, purchasing power of each resources Money, Energy, Technology, Commerce, Labor, Income(Taxes), Economy, Business, Banks, Employment, Population Controls, Industry, Transportation, and Communications. Protection from slavery or servitude to other organizations, citizens, communities, and technologies. Universal Ether Resonance's from which Universal Laws may be derived: The resonance's may be described in terms of classes of structures in nature and their energetic properties as measured in terms of Energy & Wavelength Classes of Existence for which each energy or wavelength spectrum must be measured and determined: Atom Electron Cloud Nucleus Electron Proton Neutron Positron Neutrino Muon Neutrino Anti Neutrion Anti Muon Neutrino Anti Proton Electricity (E) ) Magnetism(B) Electro-Magnetic(EB) ) Magneto-Electric(BE) Mechanical (Sound) Thermal/Pressure/Plasma/Gas/Liquid/Solid/Temperature Elements (103) Genes Molecules Cells Complex Cells/Organs Senses(Normal, ESP) Feelings/Emotions/Moods Abilities/Traits Aura/Chakra Spirit/Soul Social Patterns Social Groups Environment Species Elements/Compounds Atmosphere (Gases/Plasma) Weather Plants/Stars/Solar Systems/Galaxies/Universes Ether Light(EM)Sun Gravity(ME) Black Whole/Edges) Thoughts/Ideas/Culture/Myths/Dreams Images/Geometrical Proportions/Colors Ideal/Logical Ideas Respectively, President, Thomas Clark Radiation Health Foundation (RHF) Inc., RHF Buisness web site at: http://www.rhfweb.com/ Personal website at http://www.rhfweb.com/personal New Age Productions Inc. at http://www.rhfweb.com/newage Email: tom rhfweb.com From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 19 13:19:31 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id NAA29448; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 13:18:55 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 13:18:55 -0700 Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 12:26:53 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: An interesting anomaly Resent-Message-ID: <"VWTEZ1.0.vB7.iExBx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43261 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 6:56 PM 6/18/1, Dean T. Miller wrote: >Hi Horace, > >On Mon, 18 Jun 2001 19:18:57 -0900, hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace >Heffner) wrote: > >>Jones, it sounds like you are confusing commercial high voltage >>flourescents, which are high voltage cold cathode tubes, with ordinary low >>voltage (120 V) home flourescent lights, which have filaments at both ends >>that are heated by the starter before voltage is applied across the tube. >>The current is then regulated by balast and the filament heated by the >>through-tube current. > >The filaments are turned off once the plasma is ignited. The starters I have taken apart did not appear to work in this manner. The current was shunted either to the filaments or through the tube, but never to both. The filaments, of course, can not vaporize enough mercury to make the tube work because the condensed mercury is not located on the filaments. It could be, however, that the shot of current through the tube while the filaments are cooling does vaporize the mercury. >The >filaments serve only to vaporize the mercury inside the tube which, >once vaporized, remains vaporized due to the running current (the >filaments cool off). If memory serves, the operating temperature of the filament (or hot cathode) due to through-tube current is an important aspect of tube design, and is set so as to permit operating at low voltage, thus permitting the tube to operate with AC current. Hot cathode tubes have to operate with hot cathodes. Mercury does not signifiantly improve the conductivity of a cold metal surface. Only high temperature enables good cathode emission and low impedence at low voltages. Too bad Robert Eachus is no longer on the list, because he is expert in this. Because current is very sensitive to cathode surface temperature, gas dynamics can play a significant role in cathode conductivity, thus current flow. Also, gas/plasma flow patterns are set up by differing amounts of ion flow vs neutral atom flow in various parts of the tube, which can create dynamic light effects. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 19 14:02:58 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id OAA17664; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 14:02:04 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 14:02:04 -0700 Message-ID: <3B2FBDD4.4A73FC2A suite224.net> Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 17:02:12 -0400 From: "Francis J. Stenger" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Win95; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: OFF TOPIC Test message - Amish electricity - WD-40 References: <5.0.2.1.2.20010619141700.0293b928 pop.mindspring.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"1Q45W2.0.oJ4.CtxBx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43262 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Jed Rothwell wrote: > > Testing 1, 2, 3 . . . Is my Eudora messed up? Is this message dated Feb. 20?... My > messages came out with the wrong date and were swept into the past . . . Whew, that's good, Jed, for a minute I thought I was temporally deprived! :-) Yes, mine was dated Feb. 20 . Frank Stenger From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 19 14:10:48 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id OAA21299; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 14:10:24 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 14:10:24 -0700 Message-ID: <3B2FBFCC.243D87F3 suite224.net> Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 17:10:36 -0400 From: "Francis J. Stenger" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Win95; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Interdimensional lost & found References: <3B2F96E7.80F15A77 suite224.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"f4bkn3.0.fC5._-xBx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43263 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Rick Monteverde wrote: > Reality: As we age, our brains turn to goop. :-) Hey, you WOULD have to use Occam's razor on my theory...darn it, Rick! Knarf Stenger From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 19 15:01:35 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id PAA08559; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 15:00:56 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 15:00:56 -0700 Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 18:07:00 -0400 (EDT) From: John Schnurer To: Horace Heffner cc: vortex-l eskimo.com, Schnurer Subject: Library.....BASIC.....g anomaly In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Resent-Message-ID: <"BY6tG2.0.a52.NkyBx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43264 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Basic events in mercury vapor tube using a filament: 1] filament is heater... this does several things: 1a] makes the small amount of condensed mercury on the filament and in its immediate area tend to vaporize 1b] becomes mild source of electrons 2] auto transformer action of ballast runs the potential up to about 300 volts and in the case of those tubes with a switch type starter element, either inside or outside the tube, the ballast transformer is briefly shorted or opened or otherwise subjected to a transient ... this can cause a brief High Voltage pulse which 3] ionizes the gas-vapor mixture in the tube.... 4] the ballast acts as a limiting resistance to prevent the tube from burning up due to the low resistance [negative resistance ... but not the free energy myth] of an ionized mercury vapor plasma. 5] the primary reason for the mercury is to yield a good Ultra violet output to excite the phosphor inside the tube. The mercury vapor also lowers the resistance of the operating tube. -------- ALL of this and many many more of the basic questions like this can be found In The Library! McGraw-Hill Encyclopedia of Science and Technology.... the PAPER ONE ... is a start or the equivalent resource suggested by the REFERENCE LIBRARIAN will answer many of your questions. ------------- On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Horace Heffner wrote: > At 6:56 PM 6/18/1, Dean T. Miller wrote: > >Hi Horace, > > > >On Mon, 18 Jun 2001 19:18:57 -0900, hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace > >Heffner) wrote: > > > >>Jones, it sounds like you are confusing commercial high voltage > >>flourescents, which are high voltage cold cathode tubes, with ordinary low > >>voltage (120 V) home flourescent lights, which have filaments at both ends > >>that are heated by the starter before voltage is applied across the tube. > >>The current is then regulated by balast and the filament heated by the > >>through-tube current. > > > >The filaments are turned off once the plasma is ignited. > > The starters I have taken apart did not appear to work in this manner. The > current was shunted either to the filaments or through the tube, but never > to both. The filaments, of course, can not vaporize enough mercury to make > the tube work because the condensed mercury is not located on the > filaments. It could be, however, that the shot of current through the tube > while the filaments are cooling does vaporize the mercury. > > > >The > >filaments serve only to vaporize the mercury inside the tube which, > >once vaporized, remains vaporized due to the running current (the > >filaments cool off). > > > If memory serves, the operating temperature of the filament (or hot > cathode) due to through-tube current is an important aspect of tube design, > and is set so as to permit operating at low voltage, thus permitting the > tube to operate with AC current. Hot cathode tubes have to operate with > hot cathodes. Mercury does not signifiantly improve the conductivity of a > cold metal surface. Only high temperature enables good cathode emission > and low impedence at low voltages. Too bad Robert Eachus is no longer on > the list, because he is expert in this. > > Because current is very sensitive to cathode surface temperature, gas > dynamics can play a significant role in cathode conductivity, thus current > flow. Also, gas/plasma flow patterns are set up by differing amounts of > ion flow vs neutral atom flow in various parts of the tube, which can > create dynamic light effects. > > Regards, > > Horace Heffner > > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 19 15:16:51 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id PAA15713; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 15:16:21 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 15:16:21 -0700 Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 18:22:56 -0400 (EDT) From: John Schnurer To: "Francis J. Stenger" cc: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: solder.......Re: Interdimensional lost & found In-Reply-To: <3B2F96E7.80F15A77 suite224.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Resent-Message-ID: <"bLRj63.0.Qr3.qyyBx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43265 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: This effect happens with the: a] small bit of solder you JUST put down b] pliers c] glasses d] 8th access panel screw when replacing the accesss cover... e] after item [d].... the part is found on the bench f] after [e] you discover this is the WRONG access cover g] after you put the key in the ignition you find you are in the WRONG automobile h] Paul's Law: You can't fall off the floor i] Eddies exception: One may occasionally fall THROUGH the floor in older buildings. On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Francis J. Stenger wrote: > > > William Beaty wrote: > > > > Boy, I had a doozy today. Reality-slippage big time. > > Interesting, Bill! > > I have another theory: Working on my Lathe of late, I have often > noticed this phenomenon - I use the toolpost wrench and lay it down > in a handy spot on the bench. After some related activity, I again > look for the wrench. I scan the bench and the wrench is not in "my" > sight. I look around the shop at other sites and, then, back at the > bench. The wrench is there!! > > Theory: Tools we use often have images stored in our minds - perhaps > in multiple copies. Some of these images are reversed in "polarity" > by the internal manipulations of our brains. Now and then, when we > look for the object, our mind registers the positive incoming image > and overwrites a negative image already in the register. The result > is an "image blank" If we come back for a second look, the image > is properly resistered and all is reality... :-) > > Now, if this makes sense, I'll work up an explanation for Jed on the > close relationship between amperage and horsepower, etc. another :-) > > Frank Stenger > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 19 15:19:32 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id PAA16572; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 15:19:08 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 15:19:08 -0700 Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 18:25:42 -0400 (EDT) From: John Schnurer To: Jed Rothwell cc: vortex-L eskimo.com Subject: Re: OFF TOPIC Test message - Amish electricity - WD-40 In-Reply-To: <5.0.2.1.2.20010619141700.0293b928 pop.mindspring.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Resent-Message-ID: <"b3n2o3.0.q24.R_yBx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43266 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: If you use WD-40 to clean electrical contacts that are in a SEALED housing...such as a submersion pump .... be sure to wait until ALL of the stuff has evaporated before the housing is sealed up. If not, on first actuation WD-40 can blow up a pump switch housing very nicely... not not-nicely. On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Jed Rothwell wrote: > Testing 1, 2, 3 . . . Is my Eudora messed up? Is this message dated Feb. 20? > > Anyone, for those who are interested I twice posted a message about an > anthropology book that discusses the Amish social policy regarding > electricity. They use credit card readers with modems but not computers. My > messages came out with the wrong date and were swept into the past . . . > > The can of WD-40 warns it is flammable, but as far as I know once it dries > the residue does not conduct electricity. I think it is often used to clean > circuit boards and battery contacts. > > - JR > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 19 16:40:37 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id QAA15937; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 16:40:07 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 16:40:07 -0700 From: Alan Schneider To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: solder.......Re: Interdimensional lost & found Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 09:39:48 +1000 Message-ID: <60ovitct5g0u33puj424n98f3lbfu11gpk 4ax.com> References: <3B2F96E7.80F15A77 suite224.net> In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id QAA15905 Resent-Message-ID: <"iY_CS1.0.tu3.NB-Bx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43267 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: On Tue, 19 Jun 2001 18:22:56 -0400 (EDT), John Schnurer wrote: > > > This effect happens with the: > > a] small bit of solder you JUST put down > b] pliers > c] glasses > d] 8th access panel screw when replacing the accesss cover... > > e] after item [d].... the part is found on the bench > f] after [e] you discover this is the WRONG access cover > g] after you put the key in the ignition you find you are in > the WRONG automobile > h] Paul's Law: > > You can't fall off the floor > > i] Eddies exception: > > > One may occasionally fall THROUGH the floor in older buildings. LOL LOL Or when you discover to your extreme frustration and horror that the backshell for the Centronics connector to which you have just finished laboriously handsoldering and heatshrink insulating 37 wires has mysteriously vanished from ON the cable where you made utterly certain you put it before you started, ... and reappeared on the workbench alongside it . Note. This requires the other end of the cable to be immovably attached to a piece of equipment, or a moulded connector or similar. The phenomenon can also be described as "hole in space". A mysterious, approximately spherical volume of space with a diameter of around 6 - 8 inches and located between 12 and 18 inches from the tip of one's nose. ANY object placed in this volume is guaranteed to softly and silently vanish away for a random time period ranging from approximately 1/4 second to 35 years. Alan From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 19 16:44:52 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id QAA17754; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 16:44:01 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 16:44:01 -0700 From: Alan Schneider To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: OFF TOPIC Test message - Amish electricity - WD-40 Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 09:43:54 +1000 Message-ID: <7novitg79vg241b7rkku5gdsn0r2rtsi2e 4ax.com> References: <5.0.2.1.2.20010619141700.0293b928 pop.mindspring.com> In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id QAA17709 Resent-Message-ID: <"-FnSV3.0.9L4.1F-Bx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43268 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: The other not-so-nice property of WD40 and similar products when used on electronic equipment is that the oily residue seems to act as a dust magnet. After a few months, the resulting mess becomes very ugly, very difficult to remove and tends to be not at all helpful to the correct operation of the circuit. Alan On Tue, 19 Jun 2001 18:25:42 -0400 (EDT), John Schnurer wrote: > If you use WD-40 to clean electrical contacts that are in a SEALED >housing...such as a submersion pump .... be sure to wait until ALL of the >stuff has evaporated before the housing is sealed up. If not, on first >actuation WD-40 can blow up a pump switch housing very nicely... not >not-nicely. >> The can of WD-40 warns it is flammable, but as far as I know once it dries >> the residue does not conduct electricity. I think it is often used to clean >> circuit boards and battery contacts. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 19 17:50:51 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id RAA05618; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 17:49:49 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 17:49:49 -0700 X-Sender: rmuha mail Message-Id: In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 20:49:31 -0400 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: ralph muha Subject: Re: Neutrinos have mass Resent-Message-ID: <"_WooI.0.fN1.iC_Bx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43269 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: June 18, 2001 Physicists Solve 30 - Year - Old Case By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS Filed at 4:03 p.m. ET Solving a 30-year-old scientific mystery, physicists have found the most convincing evidence yet that neutrinos -- elusive subatomic particles that were thought to have no mass whatsoever -- have a tiny wisp of heft after all. The finding means scientists will have to adjust their theories of the universe. ``We're quite pleased with this result,'' said Kevin Lesko, a physicist at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory who helped design and operate the experiment. ``I think there are probably a lot of bets being paid off today.'' Ever since their existence was first hypothesized by Wolfgang Pauli 60 years ago, neutrinos have been thought of as massless. But on Monday, representatives of the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory in Canada announced that neutrinos made by nuclear reactions in the sun's core change from one type to another during their 93-million-mile journey to Earth. And only particles with mass can change form. The neutrino's mass cannot be much, around a mere billionth of a proton's. But its mere existence has profound implications: -- The standard model, the reigning theory in particle physics, does not allow particles that change their flavor to have mass. So that theory will have to be patched up -- though not discarded -- to accommodate the new observations. -- Because they originate deep inside the sun, neutrinos may provide an unprecedented view of what goes on there. -- They may not weigh much individually, but adding up all the neutrinos in existence changes the total estimated mass of the universe -- a figure of great interest to physicists. Neutrinos seems to account for a small but significant fraction -- possibly up to 18 percent -- of the mysterious ``dark matter'' in the universe that cannot be observed by telescopes or other ordinary means. About 100 physicists from the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom collaborated on the Sudbury experiment. They presented their results at a meeting of the Canadian Association of Physicists and in a paper submitted to the journal Physical Review Letters. Physicists have wrestled with the ``solar neutrino problem'' since the early 1970s, when experiments detected a shortfall of the particles coming from the sun. The neutrino shortage meant either that theories describing the nuclear furnace at the sun's core were wrong, or that something was happening to the particles on their way to Earth. Monday's announcement demonstrates with 99 percent confidence that it is the latter. The sun produces only one type of neutrino. But there are two other kinds that the earliest neutrino detectors could not see, and some of the ones made by the sun turn into those other types on their way to Earth. Three years ago, a Japanese experiment called Super-Kamiokande came up with indirect evidence that some of the neutrinos produced by the sun were changing into those different types. But that experiment could not distinguish among those types. Now the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory has directly observed those changed neutrinos. Measurements taken between November 1999 and January 2001 indicate that about 60 percent of the sun's neutrinos change. The Sudbury observatory is a 10-story-tall cavity a mile underground in a Canadian nickel mine. Neutrino experiments have to be performed deep underground because at the Earth's surface a heavy rain of cosmic rays and other high-energy particles drowns out the meek particles. Inside the rock-hewn cavity is an acrylic tank filled with heavy water. Most neutrinos pass through the heavy water, just as they do the rock surrounding it. But every hour or two a neutrino collides with a heavy water molecule, giving off a spark of light. By measuring that light, the detector can tell that a collision occurred and determine what kind of neutrino made it. Copyright 2001 The Associated Press From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 19 20:06:13 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id UAA27186; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 20:05:32 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 20:05:32 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Sender: mjones pop.jump.net Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 22:03:47 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Mitchell Jones Subject: Re: reactionless drives? Resent-Message-ID: <"MHl9D2.0.ce6.yB1Cx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43270 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: ***{I'm sorry for the delay in responding to this. I have been very busy, and it rolled up off the top of my screen. (Out of sight, out of mind. :-) --MJ}*** >> >>***{The best way to understand my model is to go through the description >>line by line and state your questions and arguments. I will happily > >OK. I've been visualizing the etherons ( ping pong balls ) going with >the stream. which is going down a pipe. The fluid molocules near the >edge of the pipe move slowly, the speed of movement increases as the >fluid moves toward the center. I can visulaize the balls near the >edge rotating slowly counter clockwise. The access of their rotation >would be perpendicular to the direction of flow. I don't see the >balls in the center of the pipe rotating clockwise however. ***{They wouldn't rotate at all, because the counterclockwise force would equal the clockwise force. To see why, examine the ASCII art diagram I supplied with my post, and imagine a ping-pong ball floating at the center of that stream. (You will have to convert it to a fixed-length font such as Courier, in order to see the diagram correctly.) Note that the forces impinging on the ball above the midline of the stream tend to make it rotate clockwise and those impinging on it from below the midline tend to make it rotate counterclockwise. Since the moments of corresponding forces acting on the ball from opposite sides of the midline are equal and opposite, there is no net torque. Thus it is only the balls which are *not* in the center that experience a torque one way or the other. --MJ}*** >In your previous posts you said that the Aether flows downward into >the poles and then is dispersed outward at the equator. Is this all >of the aetherons? ***{By my theory, etherons are neutral, almost massless particles roughly the size of electrons. They comprise the most large-grained aether substrate, E1. Particles in finer-grained substrates such as E2, E3, etc. are not what I mean when I use the word etherons. And, yes, all of these particles are capable of flowing through the spaces between atoms, and, thus, through the Earth. --MJ}*** I would expect them to flow through the Earth, but if I wanted to capture them would I have to set up >a detector at the poles or on the equator? ***{It wouldn't matter: you are swimming in them every day of your life, just as you are swimming in the atmosphere. As for capturing them, that seems rather hopeless, since they pass easily through matter, and, thus, through any container. --MJ}*** As I'm sure you have >picked up from my previous posts, my agenda is cohereing the aether >and putting it to work. Puthoff believes that there is enough energy >in a vacuum chamber the size of a coffee cup to vaporize all the >oceans. Then there is my friend Daryl who believes that the energy is >at best detectable. Where do you fall in this spectrum? ***{In my view, etherons exist as a vast sea of mutually repelling, spinning particles, and as a consequence their energies of translation are not very large relative to other etherons that are nearby. Thus the only energy that could with any certainty be said to be contained in a specific volume of vacuum would be the spin energies of the etherons. Since we can compute the energy content of a spinning flywheel of known mass, shape, and angular velocity, we could do the same for etherons, if we knew their masses, shapes, angular momenta, etc., with sufficient accuracy. Unfortunately, we don't. --MJ}*** >> >Your theory reminds me of John E W Keeley's theories. have you seen >> >>***{I hadn't seen them until just now. That's some mighty strange stuff, >>Kemosabe! :-) > > >I don't know if Dale has posted Keeley's pictures of his visions of >the atomic particles and subatomic and subsubatomic particles. If >your interested, I'll check them out. If there not available, I can >scan them in and email them to you ***{Forming a useful visual model of the aether is the most important issue of physics. Unfortunately, there is such a proliferation of models, almost all of which are utter nonsense, that I have found it to be pretty much a waste of time to examine them. Thus while I will be happy to look over Keeley's model if you can find a succinct presentation on a website, I don't think you should go to the trouble to mail it to me. Instead, you should simply introduce his ideas into this discussion, to the extent that you believe them to be plausible. That is the most efficient way for both of us to find out if they are worth pursuing, in my opinion. --MJ}*** >> Anyway, for the record: all of my theories treat >>entities/particles as fundamental, not waves. I consider waves to be a >>manifestation of the aggregate behavior of particles. --MJ}*** > > >I agree > >> >> >>***{I know nothing about "Cook's drive," > > >go to www.forceborne.com for details on Cook's drive. > >>but I fully expect that, in the >>future, propellers will be designed that push against the aether, thereby >>making it possible to travel literally anywhere. --MJ}*** > >Keeley also believed that. The story I heard is that he build a >flying machine that levitated based on them. ***{Without a lot of supporting detail, such stories are massively implausible, despite the fact that there are undoubted instances of technological suppression (e.g., the Burnelli airframe, nuclear power).Thus I must ask: if Keely's machine worked, what prevented its commercialization? --MJ}*** This is exciting because >there's good money to be had hauling things into stable earth orbit. >The best rate I've heard of is a Russian Energia which costs $500 per >pound, can you imagine the explosion in volume that would result if I >could lower the price to say $25 per pound? > >I assume that you are interested in thinking about such a propeller, >I will email Dale and see if I can get a description of it. It worked >by combining certain vibrations. ***{I am interested, of course, but the longer an idea has been available to the culture without being commercialized, the greater the likelihood that it is crap. "Time wounds all heels," as they say. :-) By the way, the best way for you to explore my aether theory is to insert your comments within my presentation of that theory, rather than to make comments in a stand-alone mode, as you have done here. The reason: when your comments are by themselves, I am left in the position of guessing which of my remarks they are in reference to. Thus if you intend to grill me on this subject--which I don't mind--it would be far more efficient for both of us if you were to insert your questions and comments into my original explanations. --Mitchell Jones}*** ________________ Quote of the month: "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value--i.e., zero." --Voltaire From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Jun 20 07:09:49 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id HAA15516; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 07:09:18 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 07:09:18 -0700 Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20010620100252.00a90270 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 10:08:38 -0400 To: vortex-L eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: Summer Solstice Voluntary Rolling Blackout Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <"IMYsn2.0.Lo3.DwACx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43271 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: This is the first time i have seen people using electricity as a form of protest. It is silly and I doubt the power companies will notice, but it has a 1960s era charm to it. So far, I do not think Bush's energy policies are any worse than Clinton's. His worst idea is to drill for oil in the Gulf of Mexico near fragile coastlands. That will probably hurt the tourist business more than it helps the oil companies. Anyway, there is no shortage of oil. - Jed Summer Solstice Voluntary Rolling Blackout June 21, 2001 7 p.m. to 10 p.m. How many people does it take to turn out a lightbulb and make George W. Bush change his energy policies? An entire international community! In protest of George W. Bush's energy policies and lack of emphasis on efficiency, conservation and alternative fuels, there will be a voluntary rolling blackout on the first day of Summer, June 21, from 7 p.m. to 10 p.m. all time zones (this should roll it across the planet). It's a simple protest and a symbolic act. Turn out your lights, unplug whatever you can unplug in your house. Light a candle to the sungod, kiss and tell, make love, tell ghost stories, do something besides watching television, have fun in the dark. For a list of other ideas and activities, visit our website: http://www.legitgov.org/protests_rollblackout.html From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Jun 20 12:21:26 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id MAA17143; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 12:20:31 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 12:20:31 -0700 Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20010620102641.00a90270 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 15:18:22 -0400 To: vortex-L eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: Toyota announces progress in hybrid vehicles Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <"3BHdd3.0.jB4._TFCx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43272 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: The Yomiuri newspaper reports that Toyota is pleased with the sales of the Prius hybrid automobile, which have reached 50,000 in Japan and 10,000 overseas. Toyota plans to expand production of hybrid vehicles to 300,000 per year by 2004. It announced two other initiatives The Estima Hybrid minivan. This car will seek seven passengers and features four-wheel electric drive with regenerator breaking. It gets 18 km/l of gasoline (42 mpg), with a range of 1000 km per tank. NOx and other pollution is 75% below the 2000 standards. The car has a 1500 watt 100V AC outlet, intended for people who want to use computers or hairdryers on the road, but I imagine it would also be good to have during power outages. (Power outages are much rarer in Japan than Atlanta.) A so-called "mild hybrid engine" compatible with existing engines. It is described as a "simple, easy-to-adapt hybrid system called THS-M (Toyota Hybrid System-Mild)." It reduces fuel consumption 15%, and reduces emissions to 50 percent below 2000 standards. The battery and electric motor accelerate from a standing stop to low speeds, when ICE are least effective. The electric motor acts as a generator, recharging the battery during deceleration, breaking and idling. It will be available as an option on many of Toyota's existing product line by the end of this year. These products will only be available in Japan for the time being. Honda announced that it sold 573 Insight hybrid electric vehicles in April 2001. This compares with 34,044 Accords, their best-selling model. They have sold a total of 5419 Insights in the U.S. Worldwide sales are not available. Honda says it is losing money on each sale, but within a few years it expects to ramp sales up to 10,000 units per year and it will begin to clear a profit. Honda announced it will begin selling a hybrid version of the Civic in Japan in 2001, and in North America and Europe in 2002. Comparing the Insight to the Toyota prius, driver reviews in the trade magazines and newspapers say the Prius is more like a standard automobile and has better performance. No U.S. or European automaker has demonstrated or announced a production hybrid vehicle. The Administration's National Energy Policy mentions them once"create an income tax credit for the purchase of hybrid and fuel cell vehicles to promote fuel-efficient vehicles." As things now stand, this would be a subsidy for Toyota and Honda. In a few years, the Japanese manufacturers will be far ahead on the learning curve, and they will be selling standard models with a hybrid engine option, at a profit. Sources: Yomiuri newspaper http://pressroom.toyota.com/ http://www.toyota.com/html/about/news/archive/press_release/environment/docs/2001/20010615_estima.jsp http://www.insightcentral.net/sales.html From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Jun 20 13:12:31 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id NAA07946; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 13:11:55 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 13:11:55 -0700 Message-ID: <3B3103E9.F84D87B4 bellsouth.net> Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 16:13:29 -0400 From: Terry Blanton X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: [OT] Yonaguni Ruins ARE Manmade Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"As-bA.0.2y1.BEGCx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43273 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: The strange structure off the coast on Yonaguni Island near Okinawa have proved to be manmade. http://www.summit-okinawa.gr.jp/tokusyu/ruins1.htm The weird part is, they are over 10,000 years old. History will have to be rewritten because these ruins were not constructed by a bunch of hunter/gatherers. Discovery channel is preparing a documentary which shows the carvings on the ancient ruins. You can see the images at: http://www.enterprisemission.com/catbox.htm about two pages down. Terry From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Jun 20 14:17:58 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id OAA05324; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 14:16:09 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 14:16:09 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: rick mail.highsurf.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <3B3103E9.F84D87B4 bellsouth.net> References: <3B3103E9.F84D87B4 bellsouth.net> Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 11:15:35 -1000 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Rick Monteverde Subject: Re: [OT] Yonaguni Ruins ARE Manmade Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Resent-Message-ID: <"pjsvq2.0.qI1.LAHCx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43274 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Terry - I can't find any other information about the images on Hoagland's site supposedly showing carvings on ruins off Yonaguni. I didn't see the Discovery channel show, and can't find any reference to the Yonaguni structures searching the Discovery web site. Did you see the show oin the Discovery channel? Have you found any information connecting the images of the divers with the carvings with Yonaguni? Obviously I don't trust Hoagland as a single source of information. - Rick Monteverde Honolulu, HI >The strange structure off the coast on Yonaguni Island near >Okinawa have proved to be manmade. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Jun 20 15:05:27 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id PAA25925; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 15:04:55 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 15:04:55 -0700 Message-ID: <3B311E63.5D7E31FC bellsouth.net> Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 18:06:27 -0400 From: Terry Blanton X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: [OT] Yonaguni Ruins ARE Manmade References: <3B3103E9.F84D87B4 bellsouth.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"Vtr8l.0.-K6.6uHCx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43275 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Rick Monteverde wrote: > > Terry - > > I can't find any other information about the images on Hoagland's > site supposedly showing carvings on ruins off Yonaguni. I didn't see > the Discovery channel show, and can't find any reference to the > Yonaguni structures searching the Discovery web site. > > Did you see the show oin the Discovery channel? Have you found any > information connecting the images of the divers with the carvings > with Yonaguni? Obviously I don't trust Hoagland as a single source of > information. I've never seen Hoagland outright lie. However, I agree that we need a second source of those images. I'll browse around. Meanwhile, have you read about the ruins found off the coast of Cuba recently? Terry From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Jun 20 19:43:15 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id TAA27737; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 19:42:47 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 19:42:47 -0700 From: Robin van Spaandonk To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Toyota announces progress in hybrid vehicles Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 12:42:07 +1000 Organization: Improving Message-ID: References: <5.0.2.1.2.20010620102641.00a90270 pop.mindspring.com> In-Reply-To: <5.0.2.1.2.20010620102641.00a90270 pop.mindspring.com> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id TAA27718 Resent-Message-ID: <"eNdCp1.0.Jn6.cyLCx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43276 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Wed, 20 Jun 2001 15:18:22 -0400: [snip] >The Estima Hybrid minivan. This car will seek seven passengers and features ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Who then all win a prize? ;^) [snip] Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Jun 20 20:08:11 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id UAA05105; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 20:07:36 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 20:07:36 -0700 From: Standing Bear To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: [OT] Yonaguni Ruins ARE Manmade Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 23:12:41 -0700 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.1.99] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" References: <3B3103E9.F84D87B4 bellsouth.net> <3B311E63.5D7E31FC@bellsouth.net> In-Reply-To: <3B311E63.5D7E31FC bellsouth.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01062023124100.00884 linux> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id UAA05088 Resent-Message-ID: <"XSgQ22.0.hF1.uJMCx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43277 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: On Wednesday 20 June 2001 15:06, Terry Blanton wrote: > Rick Monteverde wrote: > > > > Terry - > > > > I can't find any other information about the images on Hoagland's > > site supposedly showing carvings on ruins off Yonaguni. I didn't see > > the Discovery channel show, and can't find any reference to the > > Yonaguni structures searching the Discovery web site. > > > > Did you see the show oin the Discovery channel? Have you found any > > information connecting the images of the divers with the carvings > > with Yonaguni? Obviously I don't trust Hoagland as a single source of > > information. > > I've never seen Hoagland outright lie. However, I agree that we > need a second source of those images. I'll browse around. > > Meanwhile, have you read about the ruins found off the coast of > Cuba recently? > > Terry There was a recent television special on that. Somebody else just HAD to see it too. Their conclusion was that 'Atlantis' s most likely site was the shallow sea to the southwest off Cuba. They claim that That area off Cuba sank in the recent geologic past, and point to undersea ruins and roads, etc. in the area. There is a deep area to the south of Cuba also. Possible there could have been shearing and sliding 'down the slope' toward this deep? Do not know. One other thing. If it WAS Atlantis, and that is a very big conjecture, then another theory about their possession of 'advanced technology' just may be a concern inasmuch as its perception of validity is taken to heart by Cuban authorities who may just believe it enough to fight to get there. "Lets get that 'beam weapon' and use it on the 'Yanqui Imperialistas'!". Puts a little extra salt in archaeology at sea in unfriendly international waters. Suppose we could station a couple of aircraft carrier groups their ourselves if our government believed it too; and arrest the Cuban boats for suspicion of drug trade. Why not, nobody respects the rights of those found on international waters anymore unless they have bigger guns or missiles. The attitude is not all our fault. The British started it when they retook the Falklands from Argentina. Standing Bear From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Jun 21 00:45:43 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id AAA16367; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 00:44:45 -0700 Resent-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 00:44:45 -0700 From: dtmiller midiowa.net (Dean T. Miller) To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: An interesting anomaly Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 07:44:48 GMT Organization: Miller and Associates Message-ID: <3b32a39e.199227754 mail.midiowa.net> References: In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.5/32.452 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id AAA16196 Resent-Message-ID: <"JCq5I2.0.W_3.jNQCx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43278 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Hi Horace, On Tue, 19 Jun 2001 12:26:53 -0900, hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) wrote: >The starters I have taken apart did not appear to work in this manner. The >current was shunted either to the filaments or through the tube, but never >to both. That's correct. >The filaments, of course, can not vaporize enough mercury to make >the tube work because the condensed mercury is not located on the >filaments. That's incorrect. Enough mercury is vaporized so that a current through the tube will vaporize the remainder of the mercury. >If memory serves, the operating temperature of the filament (or hot >cathode) due to through-tube current is an important aspect of tube design, >and is set so as to permit operating at low voltage, thus permitting the >tube to operate with AC current. Hot cathode tubes have to operate with >hot cathodes. The filaments are not cathodes in the same sense that vacuum tubes use a cathode. That is, there is a current flow between the filaments, but since we're talking about (relatively) low voltage AC, the electrons will be emitted, and then return to the emitting filament. >Mercury does not signifiantly improve the conductivity of a >cold metal surface. Not needed. > Only high temperature enables good cathode emission >and low impedence at low voltages. Normal fluorescent tubes have no need for the high currents that require hot (1000 C) cathodes. I have several old "under-counter" fluorescent fixtures that don't use a starter -- just a 3 position switch. IOW, the tube is manually started. When you push the switch into the "start" position, you can easily see the filaments glow. Then the switch is released into the "run" position and the filament glow goes out (and the tube lights up as the current flows across the tube instead of through the filaments). -- Dean -- from (almost) Des Moines -- KB0ZDF From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Jun 21 00:50:50 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id AAA17607; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 00:50:19 -0700 Resent-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 00:50:19 -0700 From: dtmiller midiowa.net (Dean T. Miller) To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: OFF TOPIC Test message - Amish electricity - WD-40 Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 07:50:24 GMT Organization: Miller and Associates Message-ID: <3b33a719.200118855 mail.midiowa.net> References: <5.0.2.1.2.20010619141700.0293b928 pop.mindspring.com> <7novitg79vg241b7rkku5gdsn0r2rtsi2e@4ax.com> In-Reply-To: <7novitg79vg241b7rkku5gdsn0r2rtsi2e 4ax.com> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.5/32.452 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id AAA17589 Resent-Message-ID: <"DHxRA3.0.1J4.wSQCx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43279 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: On Wed, 20 Jun 2001 09:43:54 +1000, Alan Schneider wrote: >The other not-so-nice property of WD40 and similar products >when used on electronic equipment is that the oily residue >seems to act as a dust magnet. After a few months, the >resulting mess becomes very ugly, very difficult to remove >and tends to be not at all helpful to the correct operation >of the circuit. Right! Use the Caig products for electronic contacts. -- Dean -- from (almost) Des Moines -- KB0ZDF From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Jun 21 00:56:17 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id AAA18723; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 00:55:40 -0700 Resent-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 00:55:40 -0700 From: Robin van Spaandonk To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Hydro Environmental Resources Inc. Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 17:54:57 +1000 Organization: Improving Message-ID: <8u93jt0jj6jdpm06f45sk5eog2atj12a7r 4ax.com> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id AAA18680 Resent-Message-ID: <"pTPFe3.0.Ka4.uXQCx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43280 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Hi, Does anyone know anything about this company, other than what's on the web? (see http://hydrogenerate.com/home.html ). Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Jun 21 01:31:29 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id BAA29449; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 01:31:01 -0700 Resent-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 01:31:01 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: rick mail.highsurf.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <3B311E63.5D7E31FC bellsouth.net> References: <3B3103E9.F84D87B4 bellsouth.net> <3B311E63.5D7E31FC@bellsouth.net> Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 22:30:30 -1000 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Rick Monteverde Subject: Re: [OT] Yonaguni Ruins ARE Manmade Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Resent-Message-ID: <"sSHDX2.0.3C7.43RCx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43281 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Terry - >I've never seen Hoagland outright lie. However, I agree that we >need a second source of those images. I'll browse around. Me neither (re RH lying). But he could have been pooched by someone giving him the photos, for instance. It does have the look of the Yonaguni site. I guess they're probably the real deal, but I'm holding off jumping in with both feet on this because this one's HUGE. That is NOT an asian motif, in my opinion. I also understand that there's no real dispute among geologists about the age of that area's submersion - last big ice melt 'sunk' it, not subsidence. That 'indian' carved on the rock looks familiar in a way like mesoamerican carvings, but to me it doesn't look quite like the same style. More like some of the carvings seen in the magazine "Ancient American". Pretty exciting. Hey I just checked http://www.ancientamerican.com/ - - look at this month's cover! - Rick Monteverde Honolulu, HI >Meanwhile, have you read about the ruins found off the coast of >Cuba recently? > >Terry From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Jun 21 01:52:32 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id BAA01603; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 01:51:48 -0700 Resent-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 01:51:48 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: rick mail.highsurf.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <01062023124100.00884 linux> References: <3B3103E9.F84D87B4 bellsouth.net> <3B311E63.5D7E31FC@bellsouth.net> <01062023124100.00884 linux> Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 22:51:26 -1000 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Rick Monteverde Subject: Re: [OT] Yonaguni Ruins ARE Manmade Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Resent-Message-ID: <"pwHQ81.0.uO.aMRCx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43282 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: SB - >There was a recent television special on that. Somebody else just >HAD to see it too. Their conclusion was that 'Atlantis' s most likely >site was the shallow sea to the southwest off Cuba. I saw it. I've never thought much of Atlantis being in the Carribbean, my vote was for Santorini. Those murals from there that look like story board sketches from "Gone With the Wind" with the women's dresses and hairstyles etc. are too amazingly modern looking. Pellegrino's "Unearthing Atlantis" about Santorini is pretty convincing. But the old foundation work of Machu Picchu looks so much like the Yonaguni structures, then there's Mel Fisher find off southern Cuba from that show, and now that carving allegedly on the Yonaguni ruins make the Carribbean more interesting again. I still think Santorini IS the 'Atlantis' of Plato, as that Minoan culture clearly was a precurser to the classical Greeks, which is what Plato described. But read Timothy and Critias again if you need to be reminded that Plato also intended "Atlantis" to be a metaphor, and that there were other older and possibly even greater Atlantises out there. Like, got Mu? Starting to like the Cuba idea, but we'll see. Add that to the deep water sonar images off western Cuba - things may be heating up in archaeology! Castro's on to it. Look at the Discovery website on their Cuba. He camo (lol - honest, that was a real typo for 'came', but I think I'll leave just it in.) out to tour the boat and visit with them. Here's the Disco link: http://www.discovery.com/area/science/cuba/cuba1.html - click on "meet the mystery guest". - Rick Monteverde Honolulu, HI From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Jun 21 02:34:58 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id CAA10422; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 02:34:12 -0700 Resent-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 02:34:12 -0700 Message-ID: <001201c0fa53$2ac29a40$96859bac default> From: "Thomas D. Clark" To: "vortex" , "prj" Cc: "Thomas D. Clark" Subject: Gravity Waves From Tesla Coils (A Detailed Outline) Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 06:07:45 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3612.1700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3612.1700 X-Apparently-From: ConexTom aol.com Resent-Message-ID: <"X2ajW1.0.mY2.J-RCx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43283 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Gravity Waves From Tesla Coils (A Detailed Outline) I have summarized all my knowledge of Gravity, Weak G, Tachyeon, Undistorted Progressive Waves (UPW= TW+LW + Residue) waves, and other waves in relation to tesla coils. I have also listed an outline of how to make a gravity wave from a telsa coil. I have listed the classes of waves and wavelengths, the polarization and coherency methods, all classes of detectors of waves, and miscellaneous notes on nutrinos. . An outline of how to make faster than light gravity waves (gtw) with a series of tesla coils or other substances such as crystals : Light(photon/energy)>(coil/antenna/crystal polarized for EM TW waves)> EM TW transversed polarized wave >coil (polarized for EM LW)>EM LW wave>coil (to combine EM TW and EM LW polarized for Time Waves ME)>UPW (~LW+TW+residue)wave> approximate GTW wave.(time 9 x 10^16 ~ c^2 compressed or amplification polarized) >space time curvature waves How coils/energy transmitters/compressors work in general: Perfect Natural Energy (Infinite Energy + Infinite Speed (0 to Infinity), Blackwhole, Edge of Universe,LightSquared,Time Energy,Mind,Cyrstal Dense, Sacred Geometric,Pyramid Power,Sun/Light(Photon(3D+Time), quantized jumps of space energy and time energy(ME,EM, TIME Energy)>wave/freq>transmitter>Mechanical Energy by vibrating a substance (atom(subatomic particle), ion, element, gas, molecule, metal plate) of x radius which can have 3 vibrators (x,y,z,time) polarized by 180 to -180 degrees and spiraled clock or counter clock wise, 4 Polarization's(x,y,z, time)(no polarization in any direction frozen polarized)>a series of multiple mirrors/coils to amplify/compress energy/freq with certain polarization's>energy wave>receiver Polarization:(Angular Momentum) 4 Polarization's of Photons(Time & Space Energy) in 4 Space(x,y,z,t) Space Polarized(x,y,z) x-horizontal transverse strong TW polarized(180 (slant)to 0 to (slant)- 180 degrees) y-vertical longitudinal weak LW polarized z-circular(spiral(clock/counterclockwise(negative polarization)) Time-polarized Coherency Coherent in phase even waves - laser = dense, logical, closer, ant- aging Incoherent = out of phase not even waves normal light?= not dense, illogical, aging Wavelengths: Mechanical Energies C(Light 10^10) Sound ElectroMagnetic(Transverse Wave (TW)(E) + Longitudinal Wave (LW)(B)) Laser(Continuous Wave (CW) or Pulsed Wave (PW) C^2(10^20 or greater) Undistorted progressive waves (upw= imperfect LW with TW residues remaining) Only imperfect UPW can be physically (mechanical) made and which travel slower than light and faster than light and energy varies over a great range. When two UPW waves interfere at a distance then and em energy arises out of space time. Perfect Natural Energies(Black holes, Mind, Sun, Light, Crystals/Dense/Sacred Geometric/Pyramid Power C & C^2 (10^20 or greater)) ElectroMagnetic(x(horizontal E polarized),y (vertical B polarized)) (C = 10^10) MagnetoElectric:(y, vertical B polarized, Time Polarized)(C^2 or greater 10^20) Graviton 10^-50m Weak Gravity 10^-56m Time Energy more dense than light or energy 10^-56 to -1000m Tachyons)(Nested SpaceTime Curvatures (Inside out/Outside In)) Cosmic Rays 10^-1000(infinity)to 10^-13m Detectors Time wave detectors (d/dt) Space Wave Detectors (L^3) Heavy Water 10^-15 SQUID Pressure/Volume/Plasma/Sound Scintillators Elements 10^-10m Thermal Detectors 10^-5 to 10^-9m Photovotaic 10^-5 to 10^-6m Photocunductive FILM 10^-5 to 10^-7m Phototubes 10^-5 to 10^-6m Lasers Pulsed Or Continuous Waves with atoms, ions, and molecules 10^-5 to 10^-6 Gas, Crystals Power>Anode>Cathode> Crystal/Gas/Element surrounded by a mirror wrapped in a coil>Laser (.4 x 10^-6m) ND:YAG/Glass .53 RAMAN RUBY .69 Alexandrite .72 -.8 GA:AS .85 - .9 TI:Saphire .68-1.13 ND:YAG, ND:Glass 1.06 x 10^-6m HO:YAG 2.06 DY:CaF 2.35 HF 2.6-3.0 DF 3.4-4.0 CO2 6 10 x 10^6 Optical Filters 10^-1 to 10^2m Magnesium Oxide Zino Sulfide Zino Selenice Cadmium Telleride Germanium Polarized Antennas:(x,y,z,time) Sum of Ex and Ey Fields = Polarization Antennas of different polarization transmit different power ratios Polarization(pie,2pie,4pie,6pie) Ratio of Ey to Ex (0, 1/2, 1 ,2, Infinity) Phase angle between electric fields Ex, Ey (-180 degrees to 0 to 180 degrees) Clockwise/CounterClockwise Horizontal (x) 90 degrees Vertical(y) 90 degrees Slant (z) 45 degrees to 135 degrees Circular(clockwise/counterclockwise) Spiral Elliptical Antenna plates at different angles to each other to get all polarization's Negative Polarization's Neutrons Fission, Fusion, Uv, Nuclei, High Energy Charged Particle Accelerator(1 to 10 MEV(Number of Neutrons/second 10^10 to 10^14, Neutrons/Second (Portable)10^7 to 10^10) > Polonium, Plutonium Radkium>Protons> Quarks>Neutrons>Degenerate (Half Life 13 minutes) into Proton, Beta, Nutrino Types of Neutrons Free Neutron Fast Neutron Energy above 100,000 EV Intermediate Slow Neutrons Energy below 1EV Neutrons at Room Temperature .025 EV Neutron Flux = Neutron Density x Neutron Velocity= Neutrons/Sqaure Meters/Second Neutrons may be captured by Boron 10 isotope Respectively, President, Thomas Clark Radiation Health Foundation (RHF) Inc., RHF Buisness web site at: http://www.rhfweb.com/ Personal website at http://www.rhfweb.com/personal New Age Productions Inc. at http://www.rhfweb.com/newage Email: tom rhfweb.com From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Jun 21 05:37:06 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id FAA14730; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 05:36:36 -0700 Resent-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 05:36:36 -0700 Message-ID: <00d901c0fa46$60f50920$948f85ce computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: Cc: Subject: Re: Resonant Cavitys & Force Fields Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 06:34:56 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Resent-Message-ID: <"A4rgq.0.-b3.KfUCx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43284 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: The EM waves set up in a Resonant Cavity should mimic the Gravitational Fields produced by the sub-atomic particles/quarks in matter. Therefore with proper phasing/modes the resulting field can be used to attract or repel a mass in the vicinity of the cavity, or change the local index of refraction to "cloak" itself, thus causing optical illusions regarding it's maneuvering. For instance a bullet (mass) approaching the cavity in the repel mode can be stopped "dead in it's tracks" and/or sent back to it's source with a kinetic energy higher than it had originally. It will can work against laser beams except in space. I'll start experiments on this when I'm not too busy. :-) Regards, Frederick From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Jun 21 05:42:30 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id FAA17529; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 05:41:59 -0700 Resent-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 05:41:59 -0700 Message-ID: <3B31EBF3.135389E0 bellsouth.net> Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 08:43:31 -0400 From: Terry Blanton X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: [OT] Yonaguni Ruins ARE Manmade References: <3B3103E9.F84D87B4 bellsouth.net> <3B311E63.5D7E31FC@bellsouth.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"he3OT1.0.pH4.MkUCx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43285 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Rick Monteverde wrote: > Hey I just checked http://www.ancientamerican.com/ - - look at this > month's cover! Yeah, here's a little more information on that article from Streiber's site: http://www.unknowncountry.com/news/?id=540 Guess I'll check out the Dreamland archives for 5/19/01. Terry From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Jun 21 07:24:31 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id HAA20084; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 07:23:50 -0700 Resent-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 07:23:50 -0700 Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20010621102000.00a94108 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 10:22:32 -0400 To: vortex-L eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: JCF-3 call for papers Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <"Kc56Y1.0.hv4.rDWCx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43286 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: CALL FOR PAPERS: The 3rd Japan Meeting on Nuclear Reactions in Solid (JCF3) Dear JCF members and CF-research colleagues: The research activity on nuclear-reactions-in-solid (cold fusion) grows steadily in Japan. Since the last meeting (JCF2) at Hokkaido University, we have been informally aware of new progresses on detection of excess heat, neutrons, He-4, X-rays and "transmuted" products, from several groups, and of innovative proposals on theoretical models and analyses. The International Conference ICCF9 is now scheduled on May 19-24, 2002, in Beijing China (http://iccf9.global.tsinghua.edu.cn/iccf9.htm). So the JCF3 meeting on October 25-26, 2001, at Yokohama National University, will provide us good occasion of summarizing and discussing Japanese (and including possibly some of over-sea activities) activities in the field to make further progress toward ICCF9. Place of JCF3 Meeting: University Hall of Yokohama National University, Tokiwadai 79-5, Hotogayaku, Yokohama, Japan Date: October 25-26, 2001 Topics: nuclear products, excess heat, low energy nuclear reactions, fusion, fission, materials, experimental techniques, theories, CF politics, etc. Presentation: oral presentation (English or Japanese) in 20-25 min per paper Abstract dead-line: September 10, 2001 ( send via attached file in e-mail to (mohta newjapan.nucl.eng.osaka-u.ac.jp) or usual mail, to JCF-desk, Takahashi laboratory, Department of Nuclear Engineering, Osaka University, Yamadaoka 2-1, Suita, Osaka, Japan Abstract style: 1-2 pages, A4 format in free style, write in English Title, names (mark presenter), affiliation, keywords (4-5), main sentences, figures, tables, references Registration: on Meeting site in the Morning of October 25, 2001 registration fee: 5,000 yen banquet: 5,000 yen Inquiry to the Local Organizing Committee: to Prof. Kenichiro Ota, Yokohama National University e-mail: ken-ota ynu.ac.jp tel: 81-45-339-4021 Inquiry to JCF office: to Akito Takahashi, Osaka University e-mail: akito nucl.eng.osaka-u.ac.jp tel: 81-6-6879-7890 ------------------------------------------------------------------ From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Jun 21 08:30:56 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id IAA13463; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 08:30:27 -0700 Resent-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 08:30:27 -0700 Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20010621112705.02a9caa8 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 11:30:22 -0400 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: Re: JCF-3 call for papers In-Reply-To: <5.0.2.1.2.20010621102000.00a94108 pop.mindspring.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <"Jszgc2.0.GI3.JCXCx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43287 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: This conference was mainly in Japanese last time. It was low key but very impressive. This time I expect there will be some papers from Takahashi and Mizuno on a new technique for generating neutrons. It is highly reproducible. It has no practical use, but apparently it tells the theorists something about the reaction. I hope that Infinite Energy will have space to publish a paper about it in the next issue. Attached is the title and abstract. - Jed Neutron evolution from a palladium electrode by alternate absorption treatment of deuterium and hydrogen Tadahiko Mizuno, Tadashi Akimoto, Tadayoshi Ohmori , Akito Takahashi , Hiroshi Yamada and Hiroo Numata Abstract We observed neutron emissions from palladium after it absorbed deuterium from heavy water followed by hydrogen from light water. The neutron count, and duration of the release, and the time of the release after electrolysis was initiated all fluctuated considerably. Neutron emissions were observed in five test cases out of ten. Compared to experiments in which only deuterium was absorbed, repeatability was good and the neutron count was high. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Jun 21 08:40:55 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id IAA17349; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 08:39:48 -0700 Resent-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 08:39:48 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Sender: mjones pop.jump.net Message-Id: Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 10:34:51 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Mitchell Jones Subject: Assassins from Enron? Resent-Message-ID: <"4-rXa1.0.xE4.3LXCx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43288 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: ***{I found the following gem on sci.physics.fusion this morning. --MJ}*** > I have discovered a way that enables a $10,000 cold fusion generator > to supply all a typical house needs for 10 years and that can be > improved. The saftey features need to be done right. I need VCs, > skilled engineers, and mathematicians and physicists to flesh out my > physics theory and make a home generator that is first of all safe > from fire (a bit complicated -- but doable). Anyway, and I kid you > not, the last week has been very hard for me. I think maybe Enron > hired a team of Assassinns to kill me and my friends so they won't > lose billions of dollars. Yesterday alone there were several attempts > on my life. My friends and I are smart but we are getting tired and > may lose our lives soon. But, if not -- energy independence is doable > but some companies will lose billions. I never knew so many big > companies are more thatn willing to hire assassinns :-( > > Kevin Brent Pryor ***{Quickly turning to Enron's most recent annual report, I noted an asterisk near the entry for "operating costs." Flipping to the back, I found the associated footnote, which read as follows: "Operating costs for fiscal year 2000 were 82% higher than in 1999 primarily due to an unexpected increase in the fees charged by assassins." So there you have it! :-) --Mitchell Jones}*** ________________ Quote of the month: "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value--i.e., zero." --Voltaire From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Jun 21 09:55:57 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id JAA14827; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 09:55:05 -0700 Resent-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 09:55:05 -0700 Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20010621124057.02a94d68 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 12:54:58 -0400 To: vortex-L eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: Wired: Energy Net article Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <"pGB5z3.0.Id3.eRYCx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43289 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: The July 2001 issue of Wired magazine has a pretty good article about the electric power distribution network. The article is also available online at: http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/9.07/juice.html This describes research at EPRI and elsewhere. The "intelligent" power networks described here would be a lot more efficient than what we have now, but it would cost a lot, so I hope that CF or some other anomalous energy source will make the technology unnecessary. Some people have suggested that small CF generators might be tied together in a smart network, to share electricity, but I see no economic justification for this. I predict it would cheaper by far to install all of the power capacity you need at each house, shopping mall and factory. Years ago I said sharing CF electricity would be impractical, like timesharing personal computers for profit. Lo and behold, there is now a market developing for this very thing -- personal computer timeshare applications. The best known example is donated free computer time. See: http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu. Perhaps I was wrong about PCs and I will be wrong about shared CF capacity, but I still think it would not be worth the cost of maintaining the power network just to move a few megajoules across town. The Internet serves many purposes besides allowing PC timesharing, and it is worth keeping even if timesharing turns out to be uneconomical or unworkable for most applications. The only reason to maintain the electric power distribution network in a CF world would be to share electricity, and I doubt that would be cost-effective. The electric power network components are much larger, more expensive and dangerous than Internet hardware components. - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Jun 21 13:41:23 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id NAA12060; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 13:40:33 -0700 Resent-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 13:40:33 -0700 Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20010621163651.00a91898 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 16:40:24 -0400 To: vortex-L eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: ABB group Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <"0lh-r2.0.My2.1lbCx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43290 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Here is a $22 billion corporation involved in "alternative" conventional energy. In the last few years it has dumped its nuclear power and large, central generator production. It is now concentrating on distributed wind, micropower, and so on. See: http://www.abb.com/ Select "New Center, Alternative Energy" It is a shame we cannot interest a company like this in CF. From time to companies of this size contact me, but as far as I know they never follow through. - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Jun 21 13:50:37 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id NAA15988; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 13:49:42 -0700 Resent-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 13:49:42 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: temalloy metro.lakes.com (Unverified) Message-Id: Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 15:48:10 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: thomas malloy Subject: neutrino research Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Resent-Message-ID: <"S4q3A2.0.jv3.btbCx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43291 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Fellow Vortexians; As I have previously mentioned, about 1 part in 1,000,000 of the anticipated energy the observed C F reactions is expressed as heat. Finding the missing energy is critical to changing C F from a laboratory curiosity to an industrial process. It has been suggested that the missing energy is being expressed as neutrinos. Perhaps this site can shed some light on the problem of detecting them. > >Subject: [svpvril] Polar Etheric Stream Switches Polarizations > >This article offers evidence eminations from the Sun (Celestial >Forces) changes >polarization and other vibratory configurations BETWEEN the Sun as Source and >Earth as Receptor. This phenomena coincides with some of Russell's views. DP. > >Source: Queen's University (http://www.queensu.ca ) > >Date: Posted 6/19/2001 > >First Results From The Sudbury Neutrino Observatory Explain The Missing Solar >Neutrinos And Reveal New Neutrino Properties > >June 18, 2001 -- Physicists from Canada, the U.K. and the U.S. are today >announcing that their first results provide a solution to a 30-year >old mystery >* the puzzle of the missing solar neutrinos. The Sudbury Neutrino Observatory >(SNO) finds that the solution lies not with the Sun, but with the neutrinos, >which change as they travel from the core of the Sun to the Earth. > >http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2001/06/010619071559.htm > >-- >Life, Love and Laughter, >Dale Pond >Sympathetic Vibratory Physics >Sacred Science - Sacred Life >http://www.svpvril.com >SVP Discussion Forum: >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/svpvril/ > >Get your FREE SVP catalog of 300 books, pamphlets & videos. > >Email your snail mail address to info svpvril.com. > >Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Jun 21 15:01:26 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id PAA13881; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 15:00:52 -0700 Resent-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 15:00:52 -0700 Message-ID: <010801c0fa95$3381f580$948f85ce computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: Cc: Subject: Re: Coffee Can Resonant Cavity: Antigravity Device? Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 15:59:29 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Resent-Message-ID: <"psZLr3.0.kO3.KwcCx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43292 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: The Tanita 5 kg electronic scale that arrived today is setting idle while I conjure up a way to send a current pulse down through a 2 LB coffee can (empty) to see if the can will act as a resonant cavity, and show an AG force on the scale. I think the "Hula Hoops" were the wrong configuration, Terry. If the G field is the result of time-dilated (due to accelerated frame phenomena) currents around the theorized String Circles/Quarks, getting the EM field in the proper alignment wrt the Earth is required for getting measurable force effects. Any thoughts on whether or not this thing will "ring" as a resonant cavity, while I order up a 300 amp plus, solid state rectifier and a transformer? OTOH, Keith and Frank have some capacitor banks in-house. :-) Regards, Frederick From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Jun 21 15:46:42 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id PAA01166; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 15:45:35 -0700 Resent-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 15:45:35 -0700 From: Robin van Spaandonk To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Resonant Cavitys & Force Fields Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 08:44:59 +1000 Organization: Improving Message-ID: References: <00d901c0fa46$60f50920$948f85ce computer> In-Reply-To: <00d901c0fa46$60f50920$948f85ce computer> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id PAA01140 Resent-Message-ID: <"HU-G83.0.8I.FadCx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43293 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: In reply to Frederick Sparber's message of Thu, 21 Jun 2001 06:34:56 -0500: >The EM waves set up in a Resonant Cavity should mimic the Gravitational Fields >produced by the sub-atomic particles/quarks in matter. [snip] So now all you need to do, is turn the air around your craft into a plasma sheath, and the entire interior can be one big resonant cavity. :) Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Jun 21 15:49:27 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id PAA02668; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 15:48:50 -0700 Resent-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 15:48:50 -0700 From: Robin van Spaandonk To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Gravity Waves From Tesla Coils (A Detailed Outline) Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 08:48:12 +1000 Organization: Improving Message-ID: References: <001201c0fa53$2ac29a40$96859bac default> In-Reply-To: <001201c0fa53$2ac29a40$96859bac default> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id PAA02590 Resent-Message-ID: <"Yh6ss1.0.Tf.HddCx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43294 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: In reply to Thomas D. Clark's message of Thu, 21 Jun 2001 06:07:45 -0700: >Gravity Waves From Tesla Coils (A Detailed Outline) > >I have summarized all my knowledge buzzword, buzzword, buzzword...fill in buzzword here... Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Jun 21 15:57:58 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id PAA06897; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 15:57:32 -0700 Resent-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 15:57:32 -0700 Message-ID: <011c01c0fa9d$1e419d80$948f85ce computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: References: <00d901c0fa46$60f50920$948f85ce computer> Subject: Re: Resonant Cavitys & Force Fields Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 16:57:03 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Resent-Message-ID: <"QAfCV2.0.gh1.SldCx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43295 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: ----- Original Message ----- From: "Robin van Spaandonk" To: Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 5:44 PM Subject: Re: Resonant Cavitys & Force Fields Robin wrote: > In reply to Frederick Sparber's message of Thu, 21 Jun 2001 06:34:56 > -0500: > > >The EM waves set up in a Resonant Cavity should mimic the Gravitational Fields > >produced by the sub-atomic particles/quarks in matter. > [snip] > So now all you need to do, is turn the air around your craft into a > plasma sheath, and the entire interior can be one big resonant cavity. > :) Good idea,but where do you sit? Regards, Frederick > > > Regards, > > Robin van Spaandonk > > http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Jun 21 18:30:45 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id SAA31274; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 18:30:04 -0700 Resent-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 18:30:04 -0700 Message-ID: <3B329F97.E1287B98 suite224.net> Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 21:29:59 -0400 From: "Francis J. Stenger" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Win95; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Coffee Can Resonant Cavity: Antigravity Device? References: <010801c0fa95$3381f580$948f85ce computer> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"7S0xJ2.0.Ze7.S-fCx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43296 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Frederick Sparber wrote: > > The Tanita 5 kg electronic scale that arrived today is setting idle while I conjure up > a way to send a current pulse down through a 2 LB coffee can (empty) to see if the can > will act as a resonant cavity, and show an AG force on the scale. > Any thoughts on whether or not this thing will "ring" as a resonant cavity, while I > order up a 300 amp plus, solid state rectifier and a transformer? Wait a minute, Fred - I have a complete microwave oven power circuit that puts out about about 400 watts of S-band power at a wavelength of what, maybe 5 inches? This pile-O-power weighs just 3.52 Kg - just right for your scale. The output is a 1/4 wave stub antenna which would mount nicely to any flat-bottom cavity. All you need is a 120 volt zip cord for power and you're all set! If you can come up with maybe a cylindrical re-entry type cavity that could be tuned by varying the length of a small internal cylindrical stub, I would guess the cavity could be made to resonate to the point of destruction of the magnetron - if so desired. We need about a 1 Kg cavity to stay in your scale's range. Frank Stenger From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Jun 21 18:42:24 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id SAA03396; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 18:41:52 -0700 Resent-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 18:41:52 -0700 Message-ID: <3B32BFF0.6E4 bellsouth.net> Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 20:48:00 -0700 From: Terry Blanton X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01C-BLS20 (Win16; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Coffee Can Resonant Cavity: Antigravity Device? References: <010801c0fa95$3381f580$948f85ce computer> <3B329F97.E1287B98@suite224.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"rSopg1.0.oq.V9gCx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43297 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Francis J. Stenger wrote: > > Frederick Sparber wrote: > > > > The Tanita 5 kg electronic scale that arrived today is setting idle while I conjure up > > a way to send a current pulse down through a 2 LB coffee can (empty) to see if the can > > will act as a resonant cavity, and show an AG force on the scale. > > > Any thoughts on whether or not this thing will "ring" as a resonant cavity, while I > > order up a 300 amp plus, solid state rectifier and a transformer? > > Wait a minute, Fred - I have a complete microwave oven power circuit > that puts out about about 400 watts of S-band power at a wavelength > of what, maybe 5 inches? This pile-O-power weighs just 3.52 Kg - > just right for your scale. The output is a 1/4 wave stub antenna > which would mount nicely to any flat-bottom cavity. All you need > is a 120 volt zip cord for power and you're all set! > If you can come up with maybe a cylindrical re-entry type cavity > that could be tuned by varying the length of a small internal > cylindrical stub, I would guess the cavity could be made to resonate > to the point of destruction of the magnetron - if so desired. > We need about a 1 Kg cavity to stay in your scale's range. You'd better put a circulator and a load in or you won't have much time to tune it. I know how to tuna fish; but, how do ya tune a coffee can? Terry From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Jun 21 19:36:32 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id TAA22183; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 19:35:57 -0700 Resent-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 19:35:57 -0700 Message-ID: <3B32AF17.A587D0D0 suite224.net> Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 22:36:07 -0400 From: "Francis J. Stenger" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Win95; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Coffee Can Resonant Cavity: Antigravity Device? References: <010801c0fa95$3381f580$948f85ce computer> <3B329F97.E1287B98@suite224.net> <3B32BFF0.6E4@bellsouth.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"rGczb2.0.KQ5.BygCx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43298 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Terry Blanton wrote: > > You'd better put a circulator and a load in or you won't have much time > to tune it. We could put a chocolate-chip cookie inside? Better, tap off a short coax line and load it with a small lightbulb. Then, we could monitor the bulb to see when we got near resonance? (Where am I getting this "we" stuff??) Frank Stenger From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Jun 21 20:11:20 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id UAA02290; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 20:10:41 -0700 Resent-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 20:10:41 -0700 From: Robin van Spaandonk To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Resonant Cavitys & Force Fields Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 13:10:02 +1000 Organization: Improving Message-ID: <3gd5jto23hl96nv2u1rl83rmp79h93or92 4ax.com> References: <00d901c0fa46$60f50920$948f85ce computer> <011c01c0fa9d$1e419d80$948f85ce@computer> In-Reply-To: <011c01c0fa9d$1e419d80$948f85ce computer> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id UAA02236 Resent-Message-ID: <"Sft-c3.0.UZ.mShCx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43299 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: In reply to Frederick Sparber's message of Thu, 21 Jun 2001 16:57:03 -0500: [snip] >> So now all you need to do, is turn the air around your craft into a >> plasma sheath, and the entire interior can be one big resonant cavity. >> :) > >Good idea,but where do you sit? [snip] Well, that could be a bit of a problem...how about a metal cocoon in the middle? How much AG force could one expect anyway? Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Jun 21 20:12:41 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id UAA03538; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 20:12:23 -0700 Resent-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 20:12:23 -0700 From: Robin van Spaandonk To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Coffee Can Resonant Cavity: Antigravity Device? Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 13:11:26 +1000 Organization: Improving Message-ID: <0pd5jts6v3fu24g4l5g3rk7au1batl4f8l 4ax.com> References: <010801c0fa95$3381f580$948f85ce computer> <3B329F97.E1287B98@suite224.net> <3B32BFF0.6E4@bellsouth.net> In-Reply-To: <3B32BFF0.6E4 bellsouth.net> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id UAA03504 Resent-Message-ID: <"B14303.0.At.MUhCx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43300 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Thu, 21 Jun 2001 20:48:00 -0700: [snip] >I know how to tuna fish; but, how do ya tune a coffee can? [snip] By cutting out the bottom, and turning it into a false bottom that can slid up through the can to alter the volume. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Jun 21 20:13:58 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id UAA04353; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 20:13:38 -0700 Resent-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 20:13:38 -0700 From: Robin van Spaandonk To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Coffee Can Resonant Cavity: Antigravity Device? Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 13:13:03 +1000 Organization: Improving Message-ID: References: <010801c0fa95$3381f580$948f85ce computer> <3B329F97.E1287B98@suite224.net> In-Reply-To: <3B329F97.E1287B98 suite224.net> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id UAA04247 Resent-Message-ID: <"Y_nbe.0.n31.XVhCx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43301 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: In reply to Francis J. Stenger's message of Thu, 21 Jun 2001 21:29:59 -0400: [snip] >Wait a minute, Fred - I have a complete microwave oven power circuit >that puts out about about 400 watts of S-band power at a wavelength >of what, maybe 5 inches? Aren't the microwaves going to fry the scale electronics? Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Jun 21 23:48:58 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id XAA01466; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 23:48:24 -0700 Resent-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 23:48:24 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: rick mail.highsurf.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <3gd5jto23hl96nv2u1rl83rmp79h93or92 4ax.com> References: <00d901c0fa46$60f50920$948f85ce computer> <011c01c0fa9d$1e419d80$948f85ce computer> <3gd5jto23hl96nv2u1rl83rmp79h93or92 4ax.com> Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 20:48:11 -1000 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Rick Monteverde Subject: Re: Resonant Cavitys & Force Fields Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Resent-Message-ID: <"S5GvU2.0.hM.sekCx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43302 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: There's a guy over on JLN's list who built a gizmo with a microwave magnetron. It guides waves down into spherical cavities. Got the plans off some grain field in England! Really. Says it works too, has some small weight loss that heating and buoyancy can't account for. Chris Hardeman's the name, here's the link: http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/gravshld.htm - Rick Monteverde Honolulu, HI From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Jun 22 00:01:25 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id AAA04966; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 00:00:38 -0700 Resent-Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 00:00:38 -0700 Message-ID: <005d01c0fae0$96a52ec0$b28f85ce computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: Cc: Subject: Fw: Resonant Cavitys with corrections Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 00:59:12 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_005A_01C0FAB6.8D117FA0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Resent-Message-ID: <"1y1gx1.0.ID1.IqkCx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43303 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_005A_01C0FAB6.8D117FA0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Resonant Cavitys with corrections ------=_NextPart_000_005A_01C0FAB6.8D117FA0 Content-Type: application/msword; name="String-Circle Particles.doc" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="String-Circle Particles.doc" 0M8R4KGxGuEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAPgADAP7/CQAGAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABAAAAJQAAAAAAAAAA EAAAJwAAAAEAAAD+////AAAAACQAAAD///////////////////////////////////////////// //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////s pcEAWQAJBAAAABK/AAAAAAAAEAAAAAAABAAAEwoAAA4AYmpiavNX81cAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAJBBYAHhYAAJE9AQCRPQEAEwYAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAD//w8AAAAA AAAAAAD//w8AAAAAAAAAAAD//w8AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAF0AAAAAAJIAAAAAAAAAkgAAAJIA AAAAAAAAkgAAAAAAAACSAAAAAAAAAJIAAAAAAAAAkgAAABQAAAAAAAAAAAAAAKYAAAAAAAAApgAA AAAAAACmAAAAAAAAAKYAAAAAAAAApgAAAAwAAACyAAAAFAAAAKYAAAAAAAAAWAcAALYAAADSAAAA AAAAANIAAAAAAAAA0gAAAAAAAADSAAAAAAAAANIAAAAAAAAA0gAAAAAAAADSAAAAAAAAANIAAAAA AAAAegMAAAIAAAB8AwAAAAAAAHwDAAAAAAAAfAMAADsAAAC3AwAAtAEAAGsFAAC0AQAAHwcAACQA AAAOCAAA9AEAAAIKAAAMAQAAQwcAABUAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAkgAAAAAAAADSAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAADSAAAAAAAAANIAAAAAAAAA0gAAAAAAAADSAAAAAAAAAEMHAAAAAAAA QgIAAAAAAACSAAAAAAAAAJIAAAAAAAAA0gAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANIAAAAAAAAA0gAAAAAAAABC AgAAAAAAAEICAAAAAAAAQgIAAAAAAADSAAAAsgAAAJIAAAAAAAAA0gAAAAAAAACSAAAAAAAAANIA AAAAAAAAegMAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAApgAAAAAAAACmAAAAAAAAAJIAAAAAAAAAkgAA AAAAAACSAAAAAAAAAJIAAAAAAAAA0gAAAAAAAAB6AwAAAAAAAEICAAA4AQAAQgIAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAHoDAAAAAAAAkgAAAAAAAACSAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAegMAAAAAAADSAAAAAAAAAMYAAAAMAAAAAMrn3936 wAGmAAAAAAAAAKYAAAAAAAAAhAEAAL4AAAB6AwAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgU1RSSU5HLUNJUkNMRSBQQVJU SUNMRVMgICAgIEYuSi4gU3BhcmJlciAgMDYvMjEvMDENDWVvID0gOC44NUUtMTIgZmFyYWQvbWV0 ZXIgICAgICANDXVvID0gNChwaSlFLTcgaGVucnkvbWV0ZXIgICAgIA0NU3RyaW5nLUNpcmNsZSBS YWRpdXMsIFIgPSBrcV4yL0UNDXEgPSBDViA9IDEuNjAyRS0xOSAgKENvdWxvbWJzKQ0NayA9IDEv NChwaSllbw0NRSA9IFN0cmluZy1DaXJjbGUgb3IgUXVhcmsgRW5lcmd5ICAoSm91bGVzKSA9IDAu NUNWXjIgPSAwLjVMSV4yID0gbWNeMiANDUMgPSAyKHBpKVIqZW8gICAgKCBmYXJhZCApICANDUwg PSAyKHBpKVIqdW8gICAgICAoaGVucnkpDQ1WID0gKDJFL0MpXjEvMiAgICAgKHZvbHRzKQ0NSSA9 ICgyRS9MKV4xLzIgICAgIChhbXBlcmVzKSANDWYgID0gZnJlcXVlbmN5ICAgKEh6KSA9IDEvKExD KV4xLzIgID0gIGMvMihwaSlSICAgPSAgSS9xDQ1aID0gKEwvQyleMS8yICA9IDM3NyBvaG1zDQ0g RmFjdG9yaW5nICAiQmlnIEciIGludG8gbWFnbmV0aWMgdW5pdHM6ICAgKDYuNjdFLTExLzEuMEUt NyleMS8yID0gMC4wMjU4MyBBbXBlcmUtTWV0ZXJzL0tnDQ1Gb3IgdGhlIGVsZWN0cm9uOiAgOS4x RS0zMSBLZyowLjAyNTgzID0gMi4zNUUtMzIgQW1wZXJlLU1ldGVycywgYnV0IHRoaXMgaXMgZHVl IHRvIGEgcmVsYXRpdmlzdGljIGFjY2VsZXJhdGVkIGZyYW1lIHRpbWUgZGlsYXRpb24gaWUuLCB0 aGUgY2lyY2xpbmcgY2hhcmdlIGlzIGNvbnN0YW50bHkgYWNjZWxlcmF0aW5nIGR1ZSB0byBjaGFu Z2Ugb2YgZGlyZWN0aW9uIHdoaWNoIGNhdXNlcyBpdCdzIGNsb2NrIHRvIHNsb3cgZG93bi4gVGh1 cyB0aGUgZGlsYXRpb24gaXMgNC44RS0xMSBhbXBlcmUtbWV0ZXJzLzIuMzVFLTMyIGFtcGVyZS1t ZXRlcnMgPSAyLjBFMjENDVRoZSBncmF2aXRhdGlvbmFsIGZvcmNlIGJldHdlZW4gdHdvIGVsZWN0 cm9ucyBhdCAxLjAgbWV0ZXIgc2VwYXJhdGlvbjogDQ1GZyA9IDYuNjdFLTExKiA5LjFFLTMxXjIv MV4yID0gNS41MkUtNzEgbnQNDU9yIGluIE1hZ25ldG9ncmF2aXR5IHRlcm1zOg0NRGlsYXRlZDog IDEuMEUtNyogKDAuMDI1ODMqOS4xRS0zMSleMi8xXjIgPSA1LjUyRS03MSBudA0NVW5kaWxhdGVk OiAxLjBFLTcqICg0LjhFLTExKV4yLzFeMiA9IDIuMzA0RS0yOCBudCAgc2hvd2luZyB0aGUgMi4w RTIxIHRpbWUgZGlsYXRpb24gaW4gZWFjaCBlbGVjdHJvbi4NDUZvciBhIFF1YXJrIG9yIFN0cmlu Zy1DaXJjbGU6IH41LjUzRS0yOCBLZyAqIDAuMDI1ODMgPSAxLjQzRS0yOSBBbXBlcmUtTWV0ZXJz LCB0aGUgdGltZSBkaWxhdGlvbg1pcyA0LjhFLTExLzEuNDNFLTI5ID0gMy4zNUUxOC4NDVNpbmNl IGYgZm9yIGEgc3RyaW5nIGNpcmNsZSBpcyAxLjA0RTI1IEh6LCB0aGUgZGlsYXRlZCBvciBncmF2 aXRhdGlvbmFsIGZyZXF1ZW5jeSBpcyB+My4xIE1Iei4NDUlmICB0aGUgcGhhc2UgdmVsb2NpdHkg KDEzNypjKSBkZXRlcm1pbmVzIGYsIHRoZW4gdGhlIGdyYXZpdGF0aW9uYWwgZnJlcXVlbmN5IGlz IH40MjQgTUh6Lg0NDQAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAEAAATCgAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABAAQAAF0EAABe BAAAfgQAAH8EAACeBAAAnwQAAMAEAADBBAAA4AQAAOEEAADvBAAA8AQAADgFAAA5BQAAVgUAAFcF AAByBQAAcwUAAI4FAACPBQAArQUAAK4FAADnBQAA6AUAAAIGAAADBgAAXwYAAGAGAACiBwAA/QAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAP0AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAD9AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA/QAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAP0AAAAAAAAA AAAAAAD9AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA/QAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAP0AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAD9AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA /QAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAP0AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAD9AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA/QAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAP0AAAAA AAAAAAAAAAD9AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA/QAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAP0AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAD9AAAAAAAAAAAA AAAA/QAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAP0AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAD9AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA/QAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAP0A AAAAAAAAAAAAAAD9AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA/QAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAP0AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAD9AAAAAAAA AAAAAAAA/QAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAP0AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAQAAAB0ABAAAXQQAAF4E AAB+BAAAfwQAAJ4EAACfBAAAwAQAAMEEAADgBAAA4QQAAO8EAADwBAAAOAUAADkFAABWBQAAVwUA AHIFAABzBQAAjgUAAI8FAACtBQAArgUAAOcFAADoBQAAAgYAAAMGAABfBgAAYAYAAKIHAACjBwAA 6wcAAOwHAAAXCAAAGAgAADQIAAA1CAAAbQgAAG4IAADUCAAA1QgAADYJAABVCQAAVgkAALUJAAC2 CQAAEQoAABIKAAATCgAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAMKIHAACjBwAA6wcA AOwHAAAXCAAAGAgAADQIAAA1CAAAbQgAAG4IAADUCAAA1QgAADYJAABVCQAAVgkAALUJAAC2CQAA EQoAABIKAAATCgAA/QAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAP0AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAD9AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA/QAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAP0AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAD9AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA/QAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAP0AAAAAAAAAAAAA AAD9AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA/QAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAP0AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAD9AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA/QAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAP0AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAD9AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA/QAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAP0AAAAAAAAA AAAAAAD9AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA/QAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAEAAAATHAAfsNAvILDgPSGw CAcisAgHI5CgBSSQoAUlsAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASAA8ACgABAFsADwAC AAAAAAAAACQAAEDx/wIAJAAAAAYATgBvAHIAbQBhAGwAAAACAAAABABtSAkEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAPABBQPL/oQA8AAAAFgBEAGUAZgBhAHUAbAB0ACAAUABhAHIAYQBnAHIAYQBwAGgAIABG AG8AbgB0AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAATBgAABwAAFgAABQD/////AAQAABMKAAAHAAAAAAQAAKIH AAATCgAACAAAAAoAAAAABAAAEwoAAAkAAAAAAAAASwAAAFIAAABeAAAAYAAAAH8AAACBAAAA7AAA AO4AAABCAQAARgEAAGABAABkAQAA4gIAAOQCAADsAwAA7gMAABQEAAAWBAAAHgQAACwEAABqBAAA bAQAAG4EAAB3BAAAnQQAAJ8EAABWBQAAWwUAABUGAAAHABwABwAcAAcAHAAHABwABwAcAAcAHAAH ABwABwAcAAcAHAAHABwABwAcAAcAHAAHABwABwAEAAcAAAAAADgAAABJAAAAXgAAAGAAAAB/AAAA gQAAAMEAAADCAAAA4QAAAOIAAABBAQAAQwEAAF8BAABhAQAArgEAAK8BAABwAgAAdwIAANUDAADd AwAAFAQAABYEAABqBAAAbAQAAJ0EAACoBAAANgUAADgFAAC2BQAAvQUAABUGAAAHABoABwAaAAcA GgAHABoABwAaAAcAGgAHABoABwAaAAcAGgAHABoABwAaAAcAGgAHABoABwAaAAcAGgAHAP//BAAA ABUAVgBhAGwAdQBlAGQAIABHAGEAdABlAHcAYQB5ACAAQwBsAGkAZQBuAHQAQABDADoAXABXAEkA TgBEAE8AVwBTAFwAVABFAE0AUABcAEEAdQB0AG8AUgBlAGMAbwB2AGUAcgB5ACAAcwBhAHYAZQAg AG8AZgAgAFMAdAByAGkAbgBnAC0AQwBpAHIAYwBsAGUAIABQAGEAcgB0AGkAYwBsAGUAcwAuAGEA cwBkABUAVgBhAGwAdQBlAGQAIABHAGEAdABlAHcAYQB5ACAAQwBsAGkAZQBuAHQAKwBDADoAXABN AHkAIABEAG8AYwB1AG0AZQBuAHQAcwBcAFMAdAByAGkAbgBnAC0AQwBpAHIAYwBsAGUAIABQAGEA cgB0AGkAYwBsAGUAcwAuAGQAbwBjAP9ASFAgT2ZmaWNlSmV0IFIgU2VyaWVzAExQVDE6AEhQTURK Q1dBAEhQIE9mZmljZUpldCBSIFNlcmllcwBIUCBPZmZpY2VKZXQgUiBTZXJpZXMAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAEPAOUACABA/+ABwEAAQAAAAAAZAABAAEALAECAAEALAEBAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAQAAAAMAAAABAAAAAQAAAAAAAAAA AAAASFAgT2ZmaWNlSmV0IFIgU2VyaWVzAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAExQVDEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAQABAAAAAAAAAOQM9gkBAAAAAAACAAEAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAsASwBAQABAAAAAQABAAEAAQABAAEA AABkAAEASFAgT2ZmaWNlSmV0IFIgU2VyaWVzAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABDwDlAAgAQP/gAcBAAEAAAAA AGQAAQABACwBAgABACwBAQAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAEAAAADAAAAAQAAAAEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAEhQIE9mZmljZUpldCBSIFNl cmllcwAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABMUFQxAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAEAAQAAAAAAAADkDPYJAQAAAAAAAgABAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAALAEsAQEAAQAAAAEAAQABAAEAAQABAAAAZAABAAGAAQBWBQAAVgUAAPzb ZAABAAEAVgUAAAAAAABVBQAAAAAAAAIQAAAAAAAAABMGAABwAAAIAEAAAAMAAABHFpABAAACAgYD BQQFAgMEhzoAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAP8AAAAAAAAAVABpAG0AZQBzACAATgBlAHcAIABSAG8AbQBh AG4AAAA1FpABAgAFBQECAQcGAgUHAAAAAAAAABAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAIAAAAAAUwB5AG0AYgBvAGwA AAAzJpABAAACCwYEAgICAgIEhzoAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAP8AAAAAAAAAQQByAGkAYQBsAAAAAAAE AEEACAAAANACAAAAAAAAAAAosFamKLBWpgAAAAACAAAAAADgAAAAAgUAAAEAAgAAAAAAAAAKAAAA AAAAAAAAAAABAAEAAAABAAAAAAAAACQDAAAAhAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAKUG wAe0ALQAgAAyMAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAJgYAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAD//xIAAAAAAAAARwAgACAA IAAgACAAIAAgACAAIAAgACAAIAAgACAAIAAgACAAIAAgACAAIAAgACAAIAAgACAAIAAgACAAIAAg ACAAIAAgACAAIAAgACAAIAAgACAAIABTAFQAUgBJAE4ARwAtAEMASQBSAEMATABFACAAUABBAFIA VABJAEMATABFAFMAIAAgACAAIAAgAEYAAAAAAAAAFQBWAGEAbAB1AGUAZAAgAEcAYQB0AGUAdwBh AHkAIABDAGwAaQBlAG4AdAAVAFYAYQBsAHUAZQBkACAARwBhAHQAZQB3AGEAeQAgAEMAbABpAGUA bgB0AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA/v8AAAQKAgAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAQAAAOCFn/L5T2gQq5EIACsns9kwAAAAtAEAABAAAAABAAAAiAAAAAIAAACQAAAAAwAAAOAA AAAEAAAA7AAAAAUAAAAMAQAABwAAABgBAAAIAAAAKAEAAAkAAABIAQAAEgAAAFQBAAAKAAAAcAEA AAwAAAB8AQAADQAAAIgBAAAOAAAAlAEAAA8AAACcAQAAEAAAAKQBAAATAAAArAEAAAIAAADkBAAA HgAAAEgAAAAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICBTVFJJTkct Q0lSQ0xFIFBBUlRJQ0xFUyAgICAgRgAeAAAAAQAAAAAgICAeAAAAFgAAAFZhbHVlZCBHYXRld2F5 IENsaWVudAAgIB4AAAABAAAAAGFsdR4AAAAHAAAATm9ybWFsAEceAAAAFgAAAFZhbHVlZCBHYXRl d2F5IENsaWVudAAgIB4AAAACAAAAMgBsdR4AAAATAAAATWljcm9zb2Z0IFdvcmQgOC4wAG5AAAAA AAAAAAAAAABAAAAAALgDx936wAFAAAAAALgDx936wAEDAAAAAQAAAAMAAADgAAAAAwAAAAIFAAAD AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAP7/AAAECgIAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAIAAAAC 1c3VnC4bEJOXCAArLPmuRAAAAAXVzdWcLhsQk5cIACss+a54AQAANAEAAAwAAAABAAAAaAAAAA8A AABwAAAABQAAAIAAAAAGAAAAiAAAABEAAACQAAAAFwAAAJgAAAALAAAAoAAAABAAAACoAAAAEwAA ALAAAAAWAAAAuAAAAA0AAADAAAAADAAAABQBAAACAAAA5AQAAB4AAAAIAAAAR2F0ZXdheQADAAAA CgAAAAMAAAACAAAAAwAAACYGAAADAAAAahAIAAsAAAAAAAAACwAAAAAAAAALAAAAAAAAAAsAAAAA AAAAHhAAAAEAAABIAAAAICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg U1RSSU5HLUNJUkNMRSBQQVJUSUNMRVMgICAgIEYADBAAAAIAAAAeAAAABgAAAFRpdGxlAAMAAAAB AAAAAACYAAAAAwAAAAAAAAAgAAAAAQAAADYAAAACAAAAPgAAAAEAAAACAAAACgAAAF9QSURfR1VJ RAACAAAA5AQAAEEAAABOAAAAewA1ADUARgA4AEIARgBBADIALQA2ADYAQQA1AC0AMQAxAEQANQAt AEEAOQA5ADgALQBDADkANQA2AEUANgAwADUANgA2ADIARAB9AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABAAAAAgAAAAMAAAAEAAAABQAAAAYAAAAHAAAACAAAAAkAAAAK AAAACwAAAP7///8NAAAADgAAAA8AAAAQAAAAEQAAABIAAAATAAAA/v///xUAAAAWAAAAFwAAABgA AAAZAAAAGgAAABsAAAD+////HQAAAB4AAAAfAAAAIAAAACEAAAAiAAAAIwAAAP7////9////JgAA AP7////+/////v////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// /////////////////////////1IAbwBvAHQAIABFAG4AdAByAHkAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAWAAUB//////////8DAAAABgkCAAAAAADAAAAAAAAA RgAAAABgTFDc0vrAAaC6AeDd+sABKAAAAIAAAAAAAAAAMQBUAGEAYgBsAGUAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA4AAgD///////////////8A AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAMAAAAABAAAAAAAABXAG8AcgBkAEQA bwBjAHUAbQBlAG4AdAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGgAC AQUAAAD//////////wAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAeFgAA AAAAAAUAUwB1AG0AbQBhAHIAeQBJAG4AZgBvAHIAbQBhAHQAaQBvAG4AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAoAAIBAgAAAAQAAAD/////AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAFAAAAAAQAAAAAAAABQBEAG8AYwB1AG0AZQBuAHQAUwB1AG0AbQBhAHIAeQBJAG4AZgBv AHIAbQBhAHQAaQBvAG4AAAAAAAAAAAAAADgAAgH///////////////8AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAcAAAAABAAAAAAAAABAEMAbwBtAHAATwBiAGoAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAEgACAQEAAAAGAAAA/////wAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABqAAAAAAAAAE8AYgBqAGUAYwB0 AFAAbwBvAGwAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAWAAEA ////////////////AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACgugHg3frAAaC6AeDd+sABAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAD///////////////8AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABAAAA/v////////////////////////////////////////////// //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// /////////////////////wEA/v8DCgAA/////wYJAgAAAAAAwAAAAAAAAEYYAAAATWljcm9zb2Z0 IFdvcmQgRG9jdW1lbnQACgAAAE1TV29yZERvYwAQAAAAV29yZC5Eb2N1bWVudC44APQ5snEAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA ------=_NextPart_000_005A_01C0FAB6.8D117FA0-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Jun 22 00:13:52 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id AAA08253; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 00:13:03 -0700 Resent-Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 00:13:03 -0700 Message-ID: <006d01c0fae2$55189080$b28f85ce computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: References: <00d901c0fa46$60f50920$948f85ce computer> <011c01c0fa9d$1e419d80$948f85ce@computer> <3gd5jto23hl96nv2u1rl83rmp79h93or92@4ax.com> Subject: Re: Resonant Cavitys & Force Fields Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 01:12:32 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Resent-Message-ID: <"2JBlW2.0.k02.z_kCx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43304 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rick Monteverde" To: Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 1:48 AM Subject: Re: Resonant Cavitys & Force Fields Rick wrote: > There's a guy over on JLN's list who built a gizmo with a microwave > magnetron. It guides waves down into spherical cavities. Got the > plans off some grain field in England! Really. You gotta go with whatever crops up, Rick. :-) >Says it works too, has > some small weight loss that heating and buoyancy can't account for. > Chris Hardeman's the name, here's the link: > > http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/gravshld.htm Neat site, and very interesting tie-in to the String-Circle Particle Theory. Regards, Frederick > > - Rick Monteverde > Honolulu, HI > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Jun 22 08:20:16 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id IAA32645; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 08:19:14 -0700 Resent-Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 08:19:14 -0700 Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20010622110317.02aaab48 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 11:19:14 -0400 To: vortex-L eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: OFF TOPIC R.I.P. John Lee Hooker Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <"mHz1u2.0.-z7.n7sCx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43305 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Blues guitarist John Lee Hooker died on June 21, at age 83. He was one of the last and greatest Mississippi Delta guitarists. He was taught by his stepfather, William Moore, and by Blind Blake, Blind Lemon Jefferson and Charley Patton. He ran away from home and began performing at age 14, and continued until he was 81. His songs such as "Boom Boom" are among the most haunting and beautiful melodies of the 20th century, in my opinion. Regarding the role of the blues in American popular culture, I agree with a columnist in the Knickerbocker Magazine, who wrote in 1845: Who are our true rulers? The Negro poets, to be sure. Do they not set the fashion, and give laws to the public taste? Let one of them, in the swamps of Carolina, compose a new song, and it no sooner reaches the ear of a white amateur, than it is written down, amended (that is, almost spoilt), printed, and then put upon a course of rapid dissemination, to cease only with the utmost bounds of Anglo-Saxondom, perhaps with the world. Meanwhile, the poor author digs away with his hoe, utterly ignorant of his greatness. - quoted by Eileen Southern, U.S. author. The Music of Black Americans (1971) - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Jun 22 08:44:48 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id IAA08820; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 08:43:49 -0700 Resent-Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 08:43:49 -0700 Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20010622112850.00a953d0 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 11:43:50 -0400 To: vortex-L eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: Enron market value falls by half Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <"J_zFz2.0.k92.rUsCx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43306 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Enron is a major player in the California energy crisis and it has close connections to the Administration. Enron mainly produces electricity and gas. It has one of the largest investments in U.S. wind power and wind turbine manufacturing, but that is only a small percent of its energy portfolio. Along with many other companies, it has lately lost a ton of money trying to sell fiber optic bandwidth. The market value of the Enron has fallen by half, to $30 billion, since peaking in August 2000. See: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2001/06/22/BU178338.DTL http://www.wind.enron.com/ This is another indication that the California energy crisis will not benefit energy companies in the long term. I predict a tremendous glut in electricity in the next few years. California power consumption has dropped 11% compared to this time last year, so I cannot understand why the "crisis" continues, and why the power companies still issue warnings that rolling blackouts may be needed. - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Jun 22 09:52:52 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id JAA02370; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 09:51:56 -0700 Resent-Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 09:51:56 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <001201c0fa53$2ac29a40$96859bac default> References: <001201c0fa53$2ac29a40$96859bac default> Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 11:51:14 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: thomas malloy Subject: Re: Gravity Waves From Tesla Coils (A Detailed Outline) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Resent-Message-ID: <"XSfLn3.0.ya.hUtCx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43307 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: >Gravity Waves From Tesla Coils (A Detailed Outline) > >I have summarized all my knowledge of Gravity, Weak G, Tachyeon, >Undistorted Progressive Waves (UPW= TW+LW + Residue) waves, >and other waves in relation to tesla coils. I have also listed an outline >of how to make a gravity wave from a telsa coil. I assume that you mean, you are going to use the Tesla coil to produce a gravity wave. >I have listed the >classes of waves and wavelengths, the polarization and coherency >methods, all classes of detectors of waves, and miscellaneous >notes on nutrinos. Hum, that sounds interesting. >wave>coil (to combine EM TW and EM LW polarized for Time Waves This is the first time I've heard time referred to as a wave. >10^16 ~ c^2 compressed or amplification polarized) >space time >curvature waves This is also the first time I've heard of space time curvature waves > >How coils/energy transmitters/compressors work in general: > >Perfect Natural Energy (Infinite Energy + Infinite Speed (0 to Infinity), >Blackwhole, Edge of Universe,LightSquared,Time Energy,Mind,Cyrstal >Dense, Sacred Geometric,Pyramid Power,Sun/Light(Photon(3D+Time), >quantized jumps of space energy and time energy(ME,EM, TIME >Energy)>wave/freq>transmitter> Talk about a collection of words, what does this all mean? >Mechanical Energy by vibrating a substance >(atom(subatomic particle), ion, element, gas, molecule, metal plate) of x >radius >which can have 3 vibrators (x,y,z,time) polarized by 180 to -180 degrees and >spiraled clock or counter clock wise, 4 Polarization's(x,y,z, time)(no >polarization in any direction frozen polarized)>a series of multiple >mirrors/coils >to amplify/compress energy/freq with certain polarization's>energy >wave>receiver Ok, I can visualize that > >Polarization:(Angular Momentum) >4 Polarization's of Photons(Time & Space Energy) in 4 Space(x,y,z,t) >Space Polarized(x,y,z) > > Time-polarized Hum, I wonder what that all means > >Coherency > Coherent in phase even waves - laser = dense, logical, closer, ant- > aging is that anything like anti-aging? Is this anything like time reversal? > Incoherent = out of phase not even waves normal light?= not dense, > illogical, aging illogical, eh? > > Only imperfect UPW can be physically (mechanical) made and which > travel slower than light and faster than light and energy varies over a Slower than light I understand, but faster than light, that's a trick! >Perfect Natural Energies(Black holes, Mind, Sun, Light, >Crystals/Dense/Sacred >Geometric/Pyramid Power C & C^2 (10^20 or greater)) More words >be captured by Boron 10 isotope > >Respectively, > >President, Thomas Clark This posting doesn't make much sense to me either Thomas. What's the bottom line? Have you built any machines that produce any real effects? From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Jun 22 09:54:46 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id JAA02529; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 09:52:17 -0700 Resent-Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 09:52:17 -0700 Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20010622124244.02a97d80 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 12:52:07 -0400 To: vortex-L eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: Wind turbine inertial energy storage Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <"MtcAf3.0.Md.0VtCx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43308 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Here is something new. Wind turbines can now be used to store energy, as well as generate it. Some power companies have hesitated to build wind farms because the output varies unpredictably, and cannot be increased on demand. The latest technology may actually help smooth overall network fluctuations, by storing excess grid energy for brief periods. See: http://www.wind.enron.com/Brochures/EW_15.pdf QUOTES Storing wind power: The energy of a gust is stored by accelerating the rotor. This leads to reduced loads, improved transmission efficiencies and performance. (Graph shows power output steady while rotor speed changes.) Storing grid power: Dynamic Reactive Power and Voltage Support (DVAR). Enron Wind 's patented Dynamic VAR Control (TM) option provides support to local grid voltage, improving transmission efficiencies and providing the utility grid with reactive power (VARs)to increase stability. Enron Wind technology, outfitted with its patented dynamic VAR control option, can automatically help maintain defined grid voltage levels and/or deliver/consume reactive power to/from the utility. This feature is particularly beneficial with weaker grids or larger turbine installations. - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Jun 22 12:39:57 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id MAA02948; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 12:38:51 -0700 Resent-Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 12:38:51 -0700 Message-ID: <00ed01c0fb4a$7f5c9720$b28f85ce computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: Cc: Subject: Re: Getting Closer to Grand Unified? Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 13:37:20 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00EA_01C0FB20.761CD460" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Resent-Message-ID: <"P4u903.0.bj.9xvCx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43309 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_00EA_01C0FB20.761CD460 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit This came as a surprise. :-) It looks like Gravitation is tied up in Relativistic Electrodynamics phenomena. FJS ------=_NextPart_000_00EA_01C0FB20.761CD460 Content-Type: application/msword; name="String-Circle Particles.doc" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="String-Circle Particles.doc" 0M8R4KGxGuEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAPgADAP7/CQAGAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABAAAAJAAAAAAAAAAA EAAAJgAAAAEAAAD+////AAAAACMAAAD///////////////////////////////////////////// //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////s pcEAWQAJBAAAABK/AAAAAAAAEAAAAAAABAAA2goAAA4AYmpiavNX81cAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAJBBYAHhQAAJE9AQCRPQEA2gYAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAD//w8AAAAA AAAAAAD//w8AAAAAAAAAAAD//w8AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAF0AAAAAAJIAAAAAAAAAkgAAAJIA AAAAAAAAkgAAAAAAAACSAAAAAAAAAJIAAAAAAAAAkgAAABQAAAAAAAAAAAAAAKYAAAAAAAAApgAA AAAAAACmAAAAAAAAAKYAAAAAAAAApgAAAAwAAACyAAAAFAAAAKYAAAAAAAAAGAgAALYAAADSAAAA AAAAANIAAAAAAAAA0gAAAAAAAADSAAAAAAAAANIAAAAAAAAA0gAAAAAAAADSAAAAAAAAANIAAAAA AAAAOgQAAAIAAAA8BAAAAAAAADwEAAAAAAAAPAQAADsAAAB3BAAAtAEAACsGAAC0AQAA3wcAACQA AADOCAAA9AEAAMIKAAAMAQAAAwgAABUAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAkgAAAAAAAADSAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAADSAAAAAAAAANIAAAAAAAAA0gAAAAAAAADSAAAAAAAAAAMIAAAAAAAA fgIAAAAAAACSAAAAAAAAAJIAAAAAAAAA0gAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANIAAAAAAAAA0gAAAAAAAAB+ AgAAAAAAAH4CAAAAAAAAfgIAAAAAAADSAAAA4gAAAJIAAAAAAAAA0gAAAAAAAACSAAAAAAAAANIA AAAAAAAAOgQAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAApgAAAAAAAACmAAAAAAAAAJIAAAAAAAAAkgAA AAAAAACSAAAAAAAAAJIAAAAAAAAA0gAAAAAAAAA6BAAAAAAAAH4CAAC8AQAAfgIAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAADoEAAAAAAAAkgAAAAAAAACSAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAOgQAAAAAAADSAAAAAAAAAMYAAAAMAAAAQNSN6Ej7 wAGmAAAAAAAAAKYAAAAAAAAAtAEAAMoAAAA6BAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgU1RSSU5HLUNJUkNMRSBQQVJU SUNMRVMgICAgIEYuSi4gU3BhcmJlciAgMDYvMjEvMDENDWVvID0gOC44NUUtMTIgZmFyYWQvbWV0 ZXIgICAgICANDXVvID0gNChwaSlFLTcgaGVucnkvbWV0ZXIgICAgIA0NU3RyaW5nLUNpcmNsZSBS YWRpdXMsIFIgPSBrcV4yL0UNDXEgPSBDViA9IDEuNjAyRS0xOSAgKENvdWxvbWJzKQ0NayA9IDEv NChwaSllbw0NRSA9IFN0cmluZy1DaXJjbGUgb3IgUXVhcmsgRW5lcmd5ICAoSm91bGVzKSA9IDAu NUNWXjIgPSAwLjVMSV4yID0gbWNeMiANDUMgPSAyKHBpKVIqZW8gICAgKCBmYXJhZCApICANDUwg PSAyKHBpKVIqdW8gICAgICAoaGVucnkpDQ1WID0gKDJFL0MpXjEvMiAgICAgKHZvbHRzKQ0NSSA9 ICgyRS9MKV4xLzIgICAgIChhbXBlcmVzKSANDWYgID0gZnJlcXVlbmN5ICAgKEh6KSA9IDEvKExD KV4xLzIgID0gIGMvMihwaSlSICAgPSAgSS9xDQ1aID0gKEwvQyleMS8yICA9IDM3NyBvaG1zDQ0g RmFjdG9yaW5nICAiQmlnIEciIGludG8gbWFnbmV0aWMgdW5pdHM6ICAgKDYuNjdFLTExLzEuMEUt NyleMS8yID0gMC4wMjU4MyBBbXBlcmUtTWV0ZXJzL0tnDQ1Gb3IgdGhlIGVsZWN0cm9uOiAgOS4x RS0zMSBLZyowLjAyNTgzID0gMi4zNUUtMzIgQW1wZXJlLU1ldGVycywgYnV0IHRoaXMgaXMgZHVl IHRvIGEgcmVsYXRpdmlzdGljIGFjY2VsZXJhdGVkIGZyYW1lIHRpbWUgZGlsYXRpb24gaWUuLCB0 aGUgY2lyY2xpbmcgY2hhcmdlIGlzIGNvbnN0YW50bHkgYWNjZWxlcmF0aW5nIGR1ZSB0byBjaGFu Z2Ugb2YgZGlyZWN0aW9uIHdoaWNoIGNhdXNlcyBpdCdzIGNsb2NrIHRvIHNsb3cgZG93bi4gVGh1 cyB0aGUgZGlsYXRpb24gaXMgNC44RS0xMSBhbXBlcmUtbWV0ZXJzLzIuMzVFLTMyIGFtcGVyZS1t ZXRlcnMgPSAyLjBFMjENDVRoZSBncmF2aXRhdGlvbmFsIGZvcmNlIGJldHdlZW4gdHdvIGVsZWN0 cm9ucyBhdCAxLjAgbWV0ZXIgc2VwYXJhdGlvbjogDQ1GZyA9IDYuNjdFLTExKiA5LjFFLTMxXjIv MV4yID0gNS41MkUtNzEgbnQNDU9yIGluIE1hZ25ldG9ncmF2aXR5IHRlcm1zOg0NRGlsYXRlZDog IDEuMEUtNyogKDAuMDI1ODMqOS4xRS0zMSleMi8xXjIgPSA1LjUyRS03MSBudA0NVW5kaWxhdGVk OiAxLjBFLTcqICg0LjhFLTExKV4yLzFeMiA9IDIuMzA0RS0yOCBudCAgc2hvd2luZyB0aGUgMi4w RTIxIHRpbWUgZGlsYXRpb24gaW4gZWFjaCBlbGVjdHJvbi4NDU5vdGUgdGhhdCB0aGUgMi4zMDRF LTI4IG50ICBhdHRyYWN0aXZlIG1hZ25ldGljIGZvcmNlIGlzIHRoZSBzYW1lIGFzIHRoZSAyLjMw NEUtMjggbnQgcmVwdWxzaXZlIGVsZWN0cm9zdGF0aWMgZm9yY2UgYmV0d2VlbiB0d28gY2hhcmdl cyBxIGF0IDEuMCBtZXRlciBzZXBhcmF0aW9uIGllLiwgRmVzID0ga3FeMi9yXjIgPSAyLjMwNEUt MjggbnQhDQ1Gb3IgYSBRdWFyayBvciBTdHJpbmctQ2lyY2xlOiB+NS41M0UtMjggS2cgKiAwLjAy NTgzID0gMS40M0UtMjkgQW1wZXJlLU1ldGVycywgdGhlIHRpbWUgZGlsYXRpb24NaXMgNC44RS0x MS8xLjQzRS0yOSA9IDMuMzVFMTguDQ1TaW5jZSBmIGZvciBhIHN0cmluZyBjaXJjbGUgaXMgMS4w NEUyNSBIeiwgdGhlIGRpbGF0ZWQgb3IgZ3Jhdml0YXRpb25hbCBmcmVxdWVuY3kgaXMgfjMuMSBN SHouDQ1JZiAgdGhlIHBoYXNlIHZlbG9jaXR5ICgxMzcqYykgZGV0ZXJtaW5lcyBmLCB0aGVuIHRo ZSBncmF2aXRhdGlvbmFsIGZyZXF1ZW5jeSBpcyB+NDI0IE1Iei4NDQ0AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABAAADgkA ABYJAADaCgAAAP0AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAM2CIEAAwAEAABdBAAA XgQAAH4EAAB/BAAAngQAAJ8EAADABAAAwQQAAOAEAADhBAAA7wQAAPAEAAA4BQAAOQUAAFYFAABX BQAAcgUAAHMFAACOBQAAjwUAAK0FAACuBQAA5wUAAOgFAAACBgAAAwYAAF8GAABgBgAAogcAAP0A AAAAAAAAAAAAAAD9AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA/QAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAP0AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAD9AAAAAAAA AAAAAAAA/QAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAP0AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAD9AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA/QAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AP0AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAD9AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA/QAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAP0AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAD9AAAA AAAAAAAAAAAA/QAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAP0AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAD9AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA/QAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAP0AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAD9AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA/QAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAP0AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAD9 AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA/QAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAP0AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAD9AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA/QAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAP0AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAD9AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAEAAAAdAAQAAF0EAABe BAAAfgQAAH8EAACeBAAAnwQAAMAEAADBBAAA4AQAAOEEAADvBAAA8AQAADgFAAA5BQAAVgUAAFcF AAByBQAAcwUAAI4FAACPBQAArQUAAK4FAADnBQAA6AUAAAIGAAADBgAAXwYAAGAGAACiBwAAowcA AOsHAADsBwAAFwgAABgIAAA0CAAANQgAAG0IAABuCAAA1AgAANUIAACbCQAAnAkAAP0JAAAcCgAA HQoAAHwKAAB9CgAA2AoAANkKAADaCgAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAADKiBwAAowcAAOsH AADsBwAAFwgAABgIAAA0CAAANQgAAG0IAABuCAAA1AgAANUIAACbCQAAnAkAAP0JAAAcCgAAHQoA AHwKAAB9CgAA2AoAANkKAADaCgAA/QAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAP0AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAD9AAAAAAAAAAAA AAAA/QAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAP0AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAD9AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA/QAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAP0A AAAAAAAAAAAAAAD9AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA/QAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAP0AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAD9AAAAAAAA AAAAAAAA/QAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAP0AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAD9AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA/QAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AP0AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAD9AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA/QAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAP0AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAD9AAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABAAAAFRwAH7DQLyCw4D0h sAgHIrAIByOQoAUkkKAFJbAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAEgAPAAoAAQBbAA8A AgAAAAAAAAAkAABA8f8CACQAAAAGAE4AbwByAG0AYQBsAAAAAgAAAAQAbUgJBAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAADwAQUDy/6EAPAAAABYARABlAGYAYQB1AGwAdAAgAFAAYQByAGEAZwByAGEAcABoACAA RgBvAG4AdAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA2gYAAAUAABQAAAYA/////wAEAADaCgAABgAAAAAEAACi BwAA2goAAAcAAAAJAAAAAAQAANoKAAAIAAAAAAAAAEsAAABSAAAAXgAAAGAAAAB/AAAAgQAAAOwA AADuAAAAQgEAAEYBAABgAQAAZAEAAOICAADkAgAA7AMAAO4DAAAUBAAAFgQAAB4EAAAsBAAAagQA AGwEAABuBAAAdwQAAJ0EAACfBAAA7QQAAO8EAAAoBQAAKgUAAHcFAAB5BQAAfAUAAH8FAACXBQAA mQUAANwGAAAHABwABwAcAAcAHAAHABwABwAcAAcAHAAHABwABwAcAAcAHAAHABwABwAcAAcAHAAH ABwABwAcAAcAHAAHABwABwAcAAcAHAAHAAAAAAA4AAAASQAAAF4AAABgAAAAfwAAAIEAAADBAAAA wgAAAOEAAADiAAAAQQEAAEMBAABfAQAAYQEAAK4BAACvAQAAcAIAAHcCAADVAwAA3QMAABQEAAAW BAAAagQAAGwEAACdBAAAqAQAAO0EAAD7BAAA/QUAAP8FAAB9BgAAhAYAANwGAAAHABoABwAaAAcA GgAHABoABwAaAAcAGgAHABoABwAaAAcAGgAHABoABwAaAAcAGgAHABoABwAaAAcAGgAHABoABwD/ /wYAAAAVAFYAYQBsAHUAZQBkACAARwBhAHQAZQB3AGEAeQAgAEMAbABpAGUAbgB0AEAAQwA6AFwA VwBJAE4ARABPAFcAUwBcAFQARQBNAFAAXABBAHUAdABvAFIAZQBjAG8AdgBlAHIAeQAgAHMAYQB2 AGUAIABvAGYAIABTAHQAcgBpAG4AZwAtAEMAaQByAGMAbABlACAAUABhAHIAdABpAGMAbABlAHMA LgBhAHMAZAAVAFYAYQBsAHUAZQBkACAARwBhAHQAZQB3AGEAeQAgAEMAbABpAGUAbgB0ACsAQwA6 AFwATQB5ACAARABvAGMAdQBtAGUAbgB0AHMAXABTAHQAcgBpAG4AZwAtAEMAaQByAGMAbABlACAA UABhAHIAdABpAGMAbABlAHMALgBkAG8AYwAVAFYAYQBsAHUAZQBkACAARwBhAHQAZQB3AGEAeQAg AEMAbABpAGUAbgB0ACsAQwA6AFwATQB5ACAARABvAGMAdQBtAGUAbgB0AHMAXABTAHQAcgBpAG4A ZwAtAEMAaQByAGMAbABlACAAUABhAHIAdABpAGMAbABlAHMALgBkAG8AYwD/QEhQIE9mZmljZUpl dCBSIFNlcmllcwBMUFQxOgBIUE1ESkNXQQBIUCBPZmZpY2VKZXQgUiBTZXJpZXMASFAgT2ZmaWNl SmV0IFIgU2VyaWVzAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABDwDlAAgAQP/gAcBAAEAAAAAAGQAAQABACwBAgABACwB AQAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAEAAAADAAAAAQAAAAEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAEhQIE9mZmljZUpldCBSIFNlcmllcwAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABMUFQxAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAEAAQAAAAAAAADk DPYJAQAAAAAAAgABAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA LAEsAQEAAQAAAAEAAQABAAEAAQABAAAAZAABAEhQIE9mZmljZUpldCBSIFNlcmllcwAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAQ8A5QAIAED/4AHAQABAAAAAABkAAEAAQAsAQIAAQAsAQEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABAAAAAwAAAAEAAAABAAAAAAAA AAAAAABIUCBPZmZpY2VKZXQgUiBTZXJpZXMAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAATFBUMQAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABAAEAAAAAAAAA5Az2CQEAAAAAAAIAAQAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACwBLAEBAAEAAAABAAEAAQABAAEA AQAAAGQAAQADgAEAbAQAAGwEAABU3WQAOwE7AWwEAAAAAAAAbAQAAAAAAAACEAAAAAAAAADaBgAA UAAACABAAAADAAAARxaQAQAAAgIGAwUEBQIDBIc6AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAD/AAAAAAAAAFQAaQBt AGUAcwAgAE4AZQB3ACAAUgBvAG0AYQBuAAAANRaQAQIABQUBAgEHBgIFBwAAAAAAAAAQAAAAAAAA AAAAAACAAAAAAFMAeQBtAGIAbwBsAAAAMyaQAQAAAgsGBAICAgICBIc6AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAD/ AAAAAAAAAEEAcgBpAGEAbAAAAAAABABBAAgAAADQAgAAAAAAAAAAWrNWplqzVqYAAAAAAgAAAAAA /QAAAKYFAAABAAIAAAAAAAAADAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAQABAAAAAQAAAAAAAAAkAwAAAIQAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAClBsAHtAC0AIAAMjAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAO8GAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAA//8SAAAAAAAAAEcAIAAgACAAIAAgACAAIAAgACAAIAAgACAAIAAgACAAIAAgACAAIAAg ACAAIAAgACAAIAAgACAAIAAgACAAIAAgACAAIAAgACAAIAAgACAAIAAgACAAUwBUAFIASQBOAEcA LQBDAEkAUgBDAEwARQAgAFAAQQBSAFQASQBDAEwARQBTACAAIAAgACAAIABGAAAAAAAAABUAVgBh AGwAdQBlAGQAIABHAGEAdABlAHcAYQB5ACAAQwBsAGkAZQBuAHQAFQBWAGEAbAB1AGUAZAAgAEcA YQB0AGUAdwBhAHkAIABDAGwAaQBlAG4AdAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAP7/AAAECgIAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAEAAADghZ/y+U9oEKuRCAArJ7PZMAAAALQBAAAQAAAAAQAAAIgAAAACAAAAkAAAAAMAAADg AAAABAAAAOwAAAAFAAAADAEAAAcAAAAYAQAACAAAACgBAAAJAAAASAEAABIAAABUAQAACgAAAHAB AAAMAAAAfAEAAA0AAACIAQAADgAAAJQBAAAPAAAAnAEAABAAAACkAQAAEwAAAKwBAAACAAAA5AQA AB4AAABIAAAAICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgU1RSSU5H LUNJUkNMRSBQQVJUSUNMRVMgICAgIEYAHgAAAAEAAAAAICAgHgAAABYAAABWYWx1ZWQgR2F0ZXdh eSBDbGllbnQAICAeAAAAAQAAAABhbHUeAAAABwAAAE5vcm1hbABHHgAAABYAAABWYWx1ZWQgR2F0 ZXdheSBDbGllbnQAICAeAAAAAgAAADIAbHUeAAAAEwAAAE1pY3Jvc29mdCBXb3JkIDguMABuQAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAQAAAAAAsT8lI+8ABQAAAAAAsT8lI+8ABAwAAAAEAAAADAAAA/QAAAAMAAACmBQAA AwAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAD+/wAABAoCAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACAAAA AtXN1ZwuGxCTlwgAKyz5rkQAAAAF1c3VnC4bEJOXCAArLPmueAEAADQBAAAMAAAAAQAAAGgAAAAP AAAAcAAAAAUAAACAAAAABgAAAIgAAAARAAAAkAAAABcAAACYAAAACwAAAKAAAAAQAAAAqAAAABMA AACwAAAAFgAAALgAAAANAAAAwAAAAAwAAAAUAQAAAgAAAOQEAAAeAAAACAAAAEdhdGV3YXkAAwAA AAwAAAADAAAAAgAAAAMAAADvBgAAAwAAAGoQCAALAAAAAAAAAAsAAAAAAAAACwAAAAAAAAALAAAA AAAAAB4QAAABAAAASAAAACAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg IFNUUklORy1DSVJDTEUgUEFSVElDTEVTICAgICBGAAwQAAACAAAAHgAAAAYAAABUaXRsZQADAAAA AQAAAAAAmAAAAAMAAAAAAAAAIAAAAAEAAAA2AAAAAgAAAD4AAAABAAAAAgAAAAoAAABfUElEX0dV SUQAAgAAAOQEAABBAAAATgAAAHsANQA1AEYAOABCAEYAQQAyAC0ANgA2AEEANQAtADEAMQBEADUA LQBBADkAOQA4AC0AQwA5ADUANgBFADYAMAA1ADYANgAyAEQAfQAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAQAAAAIAAAADAAAABAAAAAUAAAAGAAAABwAAAAgAAAAJAAAA CgAAAP7///8MAAAADQAAAA4AAAAPAAAAEAAAABEAAAASAAAA/v///xQAAAAVAAAAFgAAABcAAAAY AAAAGQAAABoAAAD+////HAAAAB0AAAAeAAAAHwAAACAAAAAhAAAAIgAAAP7////9////JQAAAP7/ ///+/////v////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// //////////////////////////9SAG8AbwB0ACAARQBuAHQAcgB5AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAFgAFAf//////////AwAAAAYJAgAAAAAAwAAAAAAA AEYAAAAAYExQ3NL6wAEgnZ7oSPvAAScAAACAAAAAAAAAADEAVABhAGIAbABlAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAOAAIA//////////////// AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACwAAAAAQAAAAAAAAVwBvAHIAZABE AG8AYwB1AG0AZQBuAHQAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABoA AgEFAAAA//////////8AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHhQA AAAAAAAFAFMAdQBtAG0AYQByAHkASQBuAGYAbwByAG0AYQB0AGkAbwBuAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAKAACAQIAAAAEAAAA/////wAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAABMAAAAAEAAAAAAAAAUARABvAGMAdQBtAGUAbgB0AFMAdQBtAG0AYQByAHkASQBuAGYA bwByAG0AYQB0AGkAbwBuAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA4AAIB////////////////AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGwAAAAAQAAAAAAAAAQBDAG8AbQBwAE8AYgBqAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABIAAgEBAAAABgAAAP////8A AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAagAAAAAAAABPAGIAagBlAGMA dABQAG8AbwBsAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAFgAB AP///////////////wAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAIJ2e6Ej7wAEgnZ7oSPvAAQAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA////////////////AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAQAAAP7///////////////////////////////////////////// //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// //////////////////////8BAP7/AwoAAP////8GCQIAAAAAAMAAAAAAAABGGAAAAE1pY3Jvc29m dCBXb3JkIERvY3VtZW50AAoAAABNU1dvcmREb2MAEAAAAFdvcmQuRG9jdW1lbnQuOAD0ObJxAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA== ------=_NextPart_000_00EA_01C0FB20.761CD460-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Jun 22 16:38:27 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id QAA22905; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 16:37:50 -0700 Resent-Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 16:37:50 -0700 Message-ID: <000501c0fb92$319020a0$7647a2ac default> From: "Thomas D. Clark" To: "vortex" Cc: "Thomas D. Clark" Subject: Polarization Technologies For Gravity Waves (Arrays of Know How) Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 20:11:25 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3612.1700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3612.1700 X-Apparently-From: ConexTom aol.com Resent-Message-ID: <"GoNOp.0.lb5.DRzCx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43310 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Polarization Technologies For Gravity Waves (Arrays of Know How) I have listed below an outline of arrays of know how that I am researching to understand how to detect and generate gravity waves and new forms of energy from polarizing antennas, gyroscopes, magnetometers, directed energy beams, and computer polarizing algorithms. If you have any recommendations please send me an email. Descriptions of Arrays of Know How (U.S. Military 1994?) Magnetic Sensors Fluxgate sensors & Magnetometers One gamma root mean square per root hertz for signal frequencies of 1 hertz and above. One gamma = 10^-9 tesla. Nonmagneto materials and electrical components Polarization electronics and methods for controlling polarizing current for phase enhancement and termination(proton magnetometers). Counting circuits for resonance frequency readout, and for use of reference oscillator, and digital filtering and averaging to improve sensitivity better than 0.1 gamma and reading rates of faster than 5 per second. Obehouse proton magnetometers. Solenoidial or torodial magnetic coils for noise and interference reduction (proton magnetometers) Fluids used as a free radical to impart polarization to hydrocarbon fluids to achieve signal output Pumping lamp with proper metal filling, associated exciting coil, and control of plasma discharge modes (optically pumped magnetometers.) Heating coils for alkali metal cells, and for heating coils that minimize the interference with magnetic fields to be measured (optically pumped magnetometers.) Combinations and orientations of resonance cells, and methods of signal summation (optically pumped magnetometers) Resonance magnetic sensing systems, sensitivities greater than a gamma and data sampling rates of greater than 2 per second, nonmagnetic electronic components, , electronic techniques and computer software compensation of motion induced signals. Calibration and compensation techniques, nonmagnetic materials and electronic components, and techniques for compensating and negating the effects of stray magnetic fields generated by nearby materials and electronic components. Superconductive magnetic sensing devices super conductive thin film structures which exhibit the Josephson effects and when incorporated into suitable superconductive circuits, can provide magnetic flux sensitivities of less than 10^-18 webers rms per root hertz (or 10^-4 of a magnetic flux quantum) for signal frequencies below 10 hz or process a magnetic sensitivity of 10^-28 joules/Hz. cryogenic magnetic sensors Noise reduction designs, structures, and circuitry. Fiber optic wave guides with magnetostricitive transducer elements 10^-11 tesla sensitivity and 10^-7 Gauss. Fiber optic magnetic sensors with compensated temperature and pressure variations Detection methods for use with fiber optic interferometric and polarimetric magnetic field sensors with compatible, high sensitivity detection methods that permit discrimination against environmental and instrumental noise at frequencies below 10hz. Gravity meter and gravity gradiometer technology(Better than 100 microgals(.1 milligal)) Supercondicting gravity gradiometers Modeling and analysis of objects Characterization of object cross section as a function of size, frequency, shape, scatter matrix, and polarization properties. Modeling of electromagnetic interference of any kind. Simulation and modeling of object classification techniques incorporating synthetic aperture radar (SAR) and inverse SAR change/motion detection. Modeling and design and integration techniques Pulse compensation Statistical Sampling Technique Frequency Agility Frequency modulation Polarization modulation Pulse Doppler techniques Parametric analysis and automatic performance routines Built in test and remote maintenance and fault tolerance isolation. Techniques for development and implementation of distributed and netted sensor systems Artificial intelligence and neural network analysis and processing techniques. Pattern recognition techniques Antenna Technology Beam agile array antennas Polarizaing antennas Negative resistance antennas Wide beam electronically steerable arrays of antennas Narrow beam fast scanning antennas Doppler beam sharpening coherent processing techniques Motion compensation techniques Antennas with electronically adaptive pattern control with sidelobe cancelors Algorithms and software for antennas Near field surface reflection Energy propagation through media Signal intercept receiver technology Signal processing utilizing digital coherent integration for Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) Target enhancement (detection in clutter) Synthetic Aperture Doppler Beam Sharpening Digitally phased array beam-forming radars Wave form replication and analysis Frequency hoping modulations Instantaneous bandwidth spread- spectrum techniques Phase array and multibeam antenna control and processing logic Spectrum analyzers Directed energy absorbing and reflecting materials Nutrino amplification technologies Nutrinovotalic devices put out 1200 watts Convert nutrinos to electicity Magnetic motors and solid state devices that trap nutrinos Sperical Harmonics Respectively, President, Thomas Clark Radiation Health Foundation (RHF) Inc., RHF Buisness web site at: http://www.rhfweb.com/ Personal website at http://www.rhfweb.com/personal New Age Productions Inc. at http://www.rhfweb.com/newage Email: tom rhfweb.com From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Jun 22 16:38:44 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id QAA23057; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 16:38:26 -0700 Resent-Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 16:38:26 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Sender: mjones pop.jump.net Message-Id: Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 18:35:22 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Mitchell Jones Subject: Lighter Fare Resent-Message-ID: <"Cn8PT3.0.9e5.oRzCx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43311 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: ***{The following story was passed on by my brother-in-law. --MJ}*** > Two old ladies were outside their nursing home, having a smoke, when it > started to rain. One of the ladies pulled out a condom, cut off the end, > put it over her cigarette, and continued smoking. > > Lady 1: What's that? > Lady 2: A condom. This way my cigarette doesn't get wet. > Lady 1: Where did you get it? > Lady 2: You can get them at any drugstore. > > The next day, Lady 1 hobbles into the local drugstore and announces > to the pharmacist that she wants a box of condoms. The guy looks at her > kind of strangely (she is, after all, over 80 years of age), but politely > asks what brand she prefers. > > Lady 1: It doesn't matter as long as it fits a Camel. ________________ Quote of the month: "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value--i.e., zero." --Voltaire From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Jun 22 16:38:58 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id QAA23171; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 16:38:33 -0700 Resent-Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 16:38:33 -0700 Message-ID: <000601c0fb92$489cb380$7647a2ac default> From: "Thomas D. Clark" To: "vortex" Cc: "Thomas D. Clark" Subject: New devices to block out DEW and Gravity DEW Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 20:12:03 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3612.1700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3612.1700 X-Apparently-From: ConexTom aol.com Resent-Message-ID: <"2V1x6.0.uf5.vRzCx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43312 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: New devices to block out DEW and Gravity DEW I have enclosed below an updated list of jammers, shields, and deflecting technologies, generators, and detectors which may be used to detect and block out directed energies such as gravity waves and all other forms of directed energies. I have also enclosed a list of arrays of know how that I am researching to develop new force fields, jammers, and energy technologies at the end of this email. Shielding Sound Metal incased with up to 3 inches of vacuum in it Vacuum TV tubes Vacuum Thermistors Florescent light bulbs placed in a wood container Jamming Noise Cancellation Technologies White Noise (Random Noise) Electrical and Electromagnetic Metal Tachyeon Shield The web site www.trufax.org has some articles on DEW technologies and a device that can help absorb some of the energies that may come from DEW (Takyon Transform Technology (T1 Takyon Capsule, R1 Field Radiator, which can be ordered from P. Gutierrez, P.O. Box 1026, Toledo, Washington 98591. Portable frequency generators & jammers Rotary spark gap oscillator A high voltage transformer supplies power to the L/C tuned circuit which is tuned to a variation of the frequency or frequencies you want to jam. Tune it to 100 KHz of the frequencies you want to jam. The device will generate an extremely wide bandwidth at a variation of frequencies. 12V power source>Ultra high energy radiation plasma generator transformer>spark gab oscillator>capacitor 1>tuned inductor coil L1>tuned inductor coil L2>antenna. Different gauges of wire for the coils change the distance and the frequency you jam. Force Fields Metal plates with a capacitor and electrified to absorb energy waves. Energy and heat sinks - heater, cooler, water, Ceramic superconducting material is Yltrium-barium-copper oxide cooled with liquid nitrogen Clothing and fabrics made of metals like copper or mu metal. Powerful magnets which create levity anti- gravity force fields and rejuvenate the body to heal with vital aether energies. Plastics Water Gravity Waves/Cosmic Rays/Subatomic Particles Ceramics Crystals Plastics 4 feet Force fields Tesla, Antigravity Gyroscopic generators Mind Psychokenesis Rotating Metals, Stones, Crystals or ceramics Clothing and fabrics made of crystal fibers Powerful magnets and rotating magnets Magnetism, rotation, and superconductors can work together to effect gravity. Superconducting ceramic suspended in a magnetic field of three electric coils all enclosed in a low temperature vessel spinning at 5000 rpm. Ceramic superconducting material is Yltrium- barium-copper oxide cooled with liquid nitrogen Antigravity forces Levity which pushes up from the Earth at the same time that gravity pushes down, and normally the downward force is stronger than the upward. Some of aether flows into the vortex whirlpool but some of it that creates matter will be re-radiated back out of the object in the opposite and reverse direction. Oppositely levity force of aether. Enhance the upward flow of the levity in a laser like fashion. Rotating device pulls in the ether and redirects it Energy Detectors and Generators Time wave detectors (d/dt,time t) Magnetometers with gyroscopes to polarize for time energy fields? Flux Capacitor Time Travel Circuit 27 volt source>charging switch(SPST)>G1 25 ohm rheostat(future control)>C1 1200 picoF 50 volt electrolytic>piezeolectric transducer (value uncritical)>G2 switch (SPST) and 1M-ohm potentiometer forpast control>G3 (same as G2). G1 and G2 could be rheostats instead of potentiometers. Space Wave Detectors (L^3, Space(x,y,z)) Subatomic Particle Detectors Bubble Chambers Scintillators (Element Material) Rotating gyroscopic polarizing antennas gyroscopes rotating on an axis gyroscopes rotating in a ball gyroscopes controlled by a computer program Neutrinos - Heavy Water in a tube deep underground with lenses to amplify, neutrinos interact with heavy water to produce a proton and a flash of light. Heavy Water 10^-15 Neutron gun Quartz glass germicidal UV lamps in standard fluorescent tube configurations(4ft, 40 watt T12) and surrounded by a Boron tube spaced to allow for annular volume filled with D at atmospheric pressure may act as a source of neutrons stripped from deuterons. SQUID Pressure/Volume/Plasma/Sound Scintillators Elements 10^-10m Thermal Detectors 10^-5 to 10^-9m Photovotaic 10^-5 to 10^-6m Photocunductive FILM 10^-5 to 10^-7m Phototubes 10^-5 to 10^-6m Lasers Pulsed Or Continuous Waves with atoms, ions, and molecules 10^-5 to 10^-6 Gas, Crystals Power>Anode>Cathode> Crystal/Gas/Element surrounded by a mirror wrapped in a coil>Laser(.4 x 10^-6m) ND:YAG/Glass .53 RAMAN RUBY .69 Alexandrite .72 -.8 GA:AS .85 - .9 TI:Saphire .68-1.13 ND:YAG, ND:Glass 1.06 x 10^-6m HO:YAG 2.06 DY:CaF 2.35 HF 2.6-3.0 DF 3.4-4.0 CO2 6 10 x 10^6 Optical Filters 10^-1 to 10^2m Magnesium Oxide Zino Sulfide Zino Selenice Cadmium Telleride Germanium UV Detectors [0.010 to 0.3 Micrometers] Visible Band [0.4 to 0.8 Micrometers] Infrared Band [0.8 to 30.0] Micrometers Acoustic Sensors Fiber Optic Sensor Doppler shift detectors Measures velocity by measuring the shift in frequency of a wave cuased by an object in motion. For a closing relative velocity, the wave is compressed and the frequency is increased. For an opening relative velocity the wave is stretched and the frequency is decreased. Doppler frequency is proportional to 2x the transmitted frequency. Higher rf = Doppler shift. Frequency Doppler FD=(2 x Velocity of Target Vt)(f/c). For moving Doppler devices FD=2x(VRadar+Vtarget)(f/c), FD=(Vradar+2Vtarget+VMissile)(f/c), FD=2(VRadar CosPCosQ)(f/c), where p and q are the radar scan azimuth and depression signals. Two way radar = Frequency received Fr=Fxmt+FD=Fxmt+ 2(Vxmtr+Vtarget)fxmt/c where fxmt = frequency of x motion traveled? At 10GHz, FD = 25 hz per Knot, 19Hz per kilometer Hour,67 Herz per m/sec, 61 Hz per yd/sec, 20Hz per ft/sec. To estimate FD for other frequencies multiply the above by fxmt (GHz)/10. One way radar= f recieved=fxmt+fD=fxmt+Vxmtr or Rec fxmt/c. Closing velocity = Radar velocity cos(a)+Target velocity cos(b). Audio Doppler Radar Doppler Light Doppler Gravity Doppler Infrasound below 20 Hz Ultrasonics above 20 KiloHertz Ultrasonic and infrasonic lasers Police Radar, Satellite, Through the Wall Imaging Technologies Microwave radar signals between 30GHz and 300 GHz Microwave leak detectors 3 GHz detection's Microwave sensors up to 300 GHz Thermal Infrared Imaging Systems Weather Control Detectors and Generators HAARP and Orgon Tubes for Weather Control Scalar Interferrometers or scalar electromagnetics Heating of areas of atmosphere to produce balls of light, lightening, and weather. Heat Low Pressure High Pressure Steer Jet Streams Weather potential is a swirling vortex stream of bi-directional multivectorial entities. Steering weather by divergence of energy from the potential is a scalar. W(total number of joules of energy collected by the charge q) = (3space point Potential PHI(x,y,z) joules per columb)q(number of diverging collecting columbs) Dr. Evans, AIAS, Whittaker scalar interferometery. Antennas Polarization:(Angular Momentum) 4 Polarization's of Photons(Time & Space Energy) in 4 Space(x,y,z,t) Space Polarized(x,y,z) x-horizontal transverse strong TW polarized(180 (slant)to 0 to (slant)-180 degrees) y-vertical longitudinal weak LW polarized z-circular(spiral(clock/counterclockwise(negative polarization)) Time-polarized Coherency Coherent in phase even waves - laser = dense, logical, closer, ant-aging Incoherent = out of phase not even waves normal light?= not dense, illogical, aging Polarized Antennas:(x,y,z,time) Sum of Ex and Ey Fields = Polarization Antennas of different polarization transmit different power ratios Polarization(pie,2pie,4pie,6pie) Ratio of Ey to Ex (0, 1/2, 1 ,2, Infinity) Phase angle between electric fields Ex, Ey (-180 degrees to 0 to 180 degrees) Clockwise/Counter Clockwise Horizontal (x) 90 degrees Vertical(y) 90 degrees Slant (z) 45 degrees to 135 degrees Circular(clockwise/counterclockwise) Spiral Elliptical Antenna plates at different angles to each other to get all polarization's Negative Polarization's Negative Index of refraction antennas: Fiberglass plates with copper squares in them in the form of cross plates or perpendicular plates. Can be used to focus and detect light to small wavelengths. University of California, San Diego, Physicist Sheldon Schultz, David Smith, & Richard Shelby. Modulation Frequency modulation FM Phase modulation PM Amplitude modulation AM Tone modulation TM, Time and space polarization modulation PLM. Hypnosis rhythmic patterns Modulation PK psychokinesis modulation Bioplasmic modulation Descriptions of Arrays of Know How (U.S. Military 1994?) Magnetic Sensors Fluxgate sensors & Magnetometers One gamma root mean square per root hertz for signal frequencies of 1 hertz and above. One gamma = 10^-9 tesla. Nonmagneto materials and electrical components Polarization electronics and methods for controlling polarizing current for phase enhancement and termination(proton magnetometers). Counting circuits for resonance frequency readout, and for use of reference oscillator, and digital filtering and averaging to improve sensitivity better than 0.1 gamma and reading rates of faster than 5 per second. Obehouse proton magnetometers. Solenoidial or torodial magnetic coils for noise and interference reduction (proton magnetometers) Fluids used as a free radical to impart polarization to hydrocarbon fluids to achieve signal output Pumping lamp with proper metal filling, associated exciting coil, and control of plasma discharge modes (optically pumped magnetometers.) Heating coils for alkali metal cells, and for heating coils that minimize the interference with magnetic fields to be measured (optically pumped magnetometers.) Combinations and orientations of resonance cells, and methods of signal summation (optically pumped magnetometers) Resonance magnetic sensing systems, sensitivities greater than a gamma and data sampling rates of greater than 2 per second, nonmagnetic electronic components, , electronic techniques and computer software compensation of motion induced signals. Calibration and compensation techniques, nonmagnetic materials and electronic components, and techniques for compensating and negating the effects of stray magnetic fields generated by nearby materials and electronic components. Superconductive magnetic sensing devices super conductive thin film structures which exhibit the Josephson effects and when incorporated into suitable superconductive circuits, can provide magnetic flux sensitivities of less than 10^-18 webers rms per root hertz (or 10^-4 of a magnetic flux quantum) for signal frequencies below 10 hz or process a magnetic sensitivity of 10^-28 joules/Hz. cryogenic magnetic sensors Noise reduction designs, structures, and circuitry. Fiber optic wave guides with magnetostricitive transducer elements 10^-11 tesla sensitivity and 10^-7 Gauss. Fiber optic magnetic sensors with compensated temperature and pressure variations Detection methods for use with fiber optic interferometric and polarimetric magnetic field sensors with compatible, high sensitivity detection methods that permit discrimination against environmental and instrumental noise at frequencies below 10hz. Gravity meter and gravity gradiometer technology(Better than 100 microgals(.1 milligal)) Supercondicting gravity gradiometers Modeling and analysis of objects Characterization of object cross section as a function of size, frequency, shape, scatter matrix, and polarization properties. Modeling of electromagnetic interference of any kind. Simulation and modeling of object classification techniques incorporating synthetic aperture radar (SAR) and inverse SAR change/motion detection. Modeling and design and integration techniques Pulse compensation Statistical Sampling Technique Frequency Agility Frequency modulation Polarization modulation Pulse Doppler techniques Parametric analysis and automatic performance routines Built in test and remote maintenance and fault tolerance isolation. Techniques for development and implementation of distributed and netted sensor systems Artificial intelligence and neural network analysis and processing techniques. Pattern recognition techniques Antenna Technology Beam agile array antennas Polarizaing antennas Negative resistance antennas Wide beam electronically steerable arrays of antennas Narrow beam fast scanning antennas Doppler beam sharpening coherent processing techniques Motion compensation techniques Antennas with electronically adaptive pattern control with sidelobe cancelors Algorithms and software for antennas Near field surface reflection Energy propagation through media Signal intercept receiver technology Signal processing utilizing digital coherent integration for Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) Target enhancement (detection in clutter) Synthetic Aperture Doppler Beam Sharpening Digitally phased array beam-forming radars Wave form replication and analysis Frequency hoping modulations Instantaneous bandwidth spread- spectrum techniques Phase array and multibeam antenna control and processing logic Spectrum analyzers Directed energy absorbing and reflecting materials Nutrino amplification technologies Nutrinovotalic devices put out 1200 watts Convert nutrinos to electicity Magnetic motors and solid state devices that trap nutrinos Respectively, President, Thomas Clark Radiation Health Foundation (RHF) Inc., RHF Buisness web site at: http://www.rhfweb.com/ Personal website at http://www.rhfweb.com/personal New Age Productions Inc. at http://www.rhfweb.com/newage Email: tom rhfweb.com From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Jun 22 17:32:09 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id RAA06527; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 17:31:48 -0700 Resent-Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 17:31:48 -0700 From: Robin van Spaandonk To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: An interesting anomaly - update Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 10:31:12 +1000 Organization: Improving Message-ID: <36o7jt8h394bju8vlebelr9ik1mi2bm8p4 4ax.com> References: <3b32a39e.199227754@mail.midiowa.net> In-Reply-To: <3b32a39e.199227754 mail.midiowa.net> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id RAA06493 Resent-Message-ID: <"aRXXC1.0.tb1.pD-Cx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43313 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Hi, Well here is the first update. I turned off the light, and removed the tube, then used a pair of needle nose pliers with insulated grip to rotate the end "sockets" in the fitting so that they would make contact. I then measured the voltage between each slot of each end socket of the lamp (4 slots in all) and the tap on the bath (connected to the water system ground). With the power off, I measured a low AC voltage of 1-3 volts at one end of the fitting, and at the other end, nothing in one slot, and about 115 volts in the other slot. With the power turned on, that same slot measured 240 V (which is the supply voltage here in Australia). Note the tubes have two pins on each end, and at at least one end, a glowing filament that continues to glow when the lamp is operating normally (I can't see anything at the other end because of the phosphor coating inside the glass). New measurements to be done upon completion of laundry :). Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Jun 22 17:39:57 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id RAA09340; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 17:39:37 -0700 Resent-Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 17:39:37 -0700 From: Robin van Spaandonk To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Enron market value falls by half Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 10:38:54 +1000 Organization: Improving Message-ID: References: <5.0.2.1.2.20010622112850.00a953d0 pop.mindspring.com> In-Reply-To: <5.0.2.1.2.20010622112850.00a953d0 pop.mindspring.com> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id RAA09269 Resent-Message-ID: <"6K3C12.0.nH2.8L-Cx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43314 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Fri, 22 Jun 2001 11:43:50 -0400: [snip] >electricity in the next few years. California power consumption has dropped >11% compared to this time last year, so I cannot understand why the >"crisis" continues, and why the power companies still issue warnings that >rolling blackouts may be needed. [snip] A large part of the drop in consumption is probably due to the rolling blackouts, rather than due to any drop in demand. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Jun 22 17:47:19 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id RAA11519; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 17:47:07 -0700 Resent-Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 17:47:07 -0700 From: Robin van Spaandonk To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Getting Closer to Grand Unified? Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 10:46:27 +1000 Organization: Improving Message-ID: References: <00ed01c0fb4a$7f5c9720$b28f85ce computer> In-Reply-To: <00ed01c0fb4a$7f5c9720$b28f85ce computer> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id RAA11490 Resent-Message-ID: <"vd7rv.0.sp2.AS-Cx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43315 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: In reply to Frederick Sparber's message of Fri, 22 Jun 2001 13:37:20 -0500: >This came as a surprise. :-) > >It looks like Gravitation is tied up in Relativistic Electrodynamics phenomena. > >FJS Hi Fred, I read somewhere that 400 MHz is also about the frequency at which our brain cavities resonate. Maybe gravity wave communication is behind telepathy? :) Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Jun 22 18:25:29 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id SAA24954; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 18:25:13 -0700 Resent-Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 18:25:13 -0700 Message-ID: <3B33EFDB.32456280 ix.netcom.com> Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 18:24:43 -0700 From: Akira Kawasaki X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en]C-CCK-MCD NSCPCD472 (Win95; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Vortex Subject: [Fwd: What's New for Jun 22, 2001] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"OftPU.0.i56.v_-Cx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43316 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: -------- Original Message -------- Subject: What's New for Jun 22, 2001 Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 17:20:53 -0400 (EDT) From: "What's New" To: aki ix.netcom.com WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 22 Jun 01 Washington, DC 1. FLASH! BUSH IS RUMORED TO HAVE CHOSEN A SCIENCE ADVISOR. You may recall that back in March the President reactivated PCAST, the President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, with Silicon Valley venture capitalist Floyd Kvamme as co-chair. The other co-chair was to be the White House Science Advisor, but there was no Science Advisor, even as the President waded into deep water on global warming and missile defense. But today, it is all over Washington that Jack Marburger, an APS member and the Director of Brookhaven National Laboratory, has accepted the job. 2. DEFINING SCIENCE: WHY DO CATTLEMEN WEAR HIGH BOOTS? A bill to define science, HR3344, is under consideration in the Oregon Senate. The definition is taken directly from a statement titled "What is Science?" adopted two years ago by the APS Council. The principal support for the bill is from the Oregon Cattlemen's Association. But why, I can hear you asking, are the cattlemen concerned with how science is defined? You may want to step carefully as we attempt to walk through that barnyard: There is a move in Oregon to clean up its streams, and cows well, you know what cows do. Anyway, the cattlemen want to counter the peer-reviewed scientific arguments of environmentalists. In the words of a spokesman for the OCA, "Currently, anyone can define what will be called science... The term `peer-reviewed science' could mean a review by a neighbor or friend." Squish! 3. BUDGET SURPLUS? FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IS FORCED TO BORROW. How quickly can black ink turn red? It seems like only yesterday that a big problem was figuring out how to spend the projected surplus in federal revenue. Some suggested that, since advances in science and technology were largely responsible for the booming economy, it would make sense to put some of the surplus back into research. Instead, we got a tax cut. Now, a story from Bloomberg News says the government may be forced to borrow to pay for the scheduled tax rebates. It was too good to last. 4. ENERGY POLICY: DO THE DEEDS MATCH THE WORDS? On Thursday, Energy Secretary Spencer Abraham testified for the first time before the House Science Committee. The committee wanted an explanation of apparent discrepancies between the commitment to conservation, alternative energy sources, and increased efficiency in the National Energy Policy, and administration cuts in research and development programs that might move us toward these ends. As Chair Boehlert (R-NY) noted, "the deeds don't match the words." To this, Secretary Abraham explained that there was a gap between the time the budget was submitted and development of the National Energy Policy. Since one does not drive the other, incongruities exist. Has the administration sought amendments to the budget request to smooth out these incongruities? In this case, the words do match the deeds: nope. THE AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY (Note: Opinions are the author's and are not necessarily shared by the APS, but they should be.) From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Jun 22 18:33:42 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id SAA27118; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 18:33:25 -0700 Resent-Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 18:33:25 -0700 Message-ID: <01C0FB4A.2FED0CB0.dequickert ucdavis.edu> From: Dan Quickert To: "'vortex-l eskimo.com'" Subject: RE: Enron market value falls by half Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 18:35:52 -0700 X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet E-mail/MAPI - 8.0.0.4211 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"lB8HH3.0.ed6.b7_Cx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43317 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: On Friday, June 22, 2001 5:39 PM, Robin van Spaandonk wrote: > A large part of the drop in consumption is probably due to the rolling > blackouts, rather than due to any drop in demand. Actually the blackouts have been few, and short in duration -- so could not possibly account for a significant fraction of 11% decline in use. Dan Quickert (in California) From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Jun 22 18:43:59 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id SAA30324; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 18:43:31 -0700 Resent-Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 18:43:31 -0700 Message-ID: <019b01c0fb7d$769f2980$b28f85ce computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: References: <00ed01c0fb4a$7f5c9720$b28f85ce computer> Subject: Re: Getting Closer to Grand Unified? Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 19:42:54 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Resent-Message-ID: <"n3lbb2.0.VP7.1H_Cx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43318 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: ----- Original Message ----- From: "Robin van Spaandonk" To: Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 7:46 PM Subject: Re: Getting Closer to Grand Unified? > Hi Fred, > > I read somewhere that 400 MHz is also about the frequency at which our > brain cavities resonate. Maybe gravity wave communication is behind > telepathy? :) 470 to 476 MHz is the UHF TeleVision channel 14. Have you seen any used car commercials in your dreams? :-) Regards, Frederick > > > Regards, > > Robin van Spaandonk > > http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Jun 22 20:54:14 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id UAA31442; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 20:53:46 -0700 Resent-Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 20:53:46 -0700 X-Apparently-From: Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.20010622223919.0095d8d0 postoffice.swbell.net> X-Sender: cjford1 pop.mail.yahoo.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58 Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 22:57:14 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Charles Ford Subject: Re: Getting Closer to Grand Unified? In-Reply-To: <00ed01c0fb4a$7f5c9720$b28f85ce computer> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <"dnVQv3.0.Ah7.9B1Dx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43319 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 01:37 PM 6/22/01 -0500, you wrote: >This came as a surprise. :-) > >It looks like Gravitation is tied up in Relativistic Electrodynamics >phenomena. > >FJS Fred: For several years now I have ben playing with a conjecture involving this. I have not had the skills on the sub atomic level to be able to put together a mathematical solution. There are others that also believe that G is an electromagnetic side effect of the atom. A wholistic explanation could take the mystery out of many processes that go on un understood. My conjecture also has some problems that have prevented me form going forward. Like I was unable to fathom the apparent existence of the neutron as a mass. Ahh but I am only an electrical engineer. I teach myself physics as time permits. I do find it interesting that you arrived at a Z 377 ohms (the exact impedance for a pi circular radiating element.) This is more then coincidence? IF this is true I think you could attenuate G with a simple bowel shaped superconductor like a hunk of chain link fence will attenuate a cell phone signal. This could be experimental proof. Charlie Ford KC5-OWZ cjford1 yahoo.com cjford1 swbell.net _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Jun 22 22:05:22 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id WAA14482; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 22:04:56 -0700 Resent-Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 22:04:56 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Sender: mjones pop.jump.net Message-Id: Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 00:00:58 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Mitchell Jones Subject: Prospecting for Uranium Resent-Message-ID: <"wbYXS.0.CY3.tD2Dx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43320 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Do any of you have any experience at uranium prospecting? What would be the best equipment to use? Any specific recommendations? --MJ ________________ Quote of the month: "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value--i.e., zero." --Voltaire From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Jun 23 01:26:22 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id BAA17544; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 01:25:51 -0700 Resent-Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 01:25:51 -0700 From: Robin van Spaandonk To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Prospecting for Uranium Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 18:25:11 +1000 Organization: Improving Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id BAA17523 Resent-Message-ID: <"BJyO13.0.2I4.EA5Dx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43321 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: In reply to Mitchell Jones's message of Sat, 23 Jun 2001 00:00:58 -0500: >Do any of you have any experience at uranium prospecting? What would be the >best equipment to use? Any specific recommendations? --MJ [snip] Yes, get in touch with Bruce Perreault, who has already done it. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Jun 23 03:12:39 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id DAA02775; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 03:12:11 -0700 Resent-Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 03:12:11 -0700 Message-ID: <01e501c0fbc4$85ac5780$b28f85ce computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: Cc: References: <4.2.0.58.20010622223919.0095d8d0 postoffice.swbell.net> Subject: Re: Getting Closer to Grand Unified? Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 04:10:36 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Resent-Message-ID: <"oARtM2.0.Ch.xj6Dx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43322 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: ----- Original Message ----- From: "Charles Ford" To: Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 10:57 PM Subject: Re: Getting Closer to Grand Unified? Charles Ford wrote: > At 01:37 PM 6/22/01 -0500, you wrote: > >This came as a surprise. :-) > > > >It looks like Gravitation is tied up in Relativistic Electrodynamics > >phenomena. > > > >FJS > Fred: > > For several years now I have been playing with a conjecture involving this. > I have not had the skills on the sub atomic level to be able to put > together a mathematical solution. There are others that also believe that > G is an electromagnetic side effect of the atom. A wholistic explanation > could take the mystery out of many processes that go on un understood. For starters Charles, with electron beams as the electrons approach the velocity of light c, instead of diverging, the repulsive force F = kq^2/r^2 between the electrons diminishes as though they start to attract each other. This is similar to running currents in the same direction in parallel wires. IOW with relativistic effects, charge flow and magnetism(and probably G) are indistinguishable. This is borne out in particle accelerators such as the Continuous Electron Beam Accelerator Facility (CEBAF) at Jefferson Lab, www.jlab.org where the hair-thin electron beams are moving so close to c (~ 12 GeV ) that the relativistic mass of the electrons is such that they weigh more than 12 times as much as a proton or neutron. What I was getting at, is that the gravity force seems to be an Intrinsically Attractive Force that comes about by way of the relativistic mechanisms of the sub-atomic particles. > > My conjecture also has some problems that have prevented me form going > forward. Like I was unable to fathom the apparent existence of the neutron > as a mass. Whew. :-) The mass is there. Remember, a neutron decays to a proton, and an electron, and a neutrino. > > Ahh but I am only an electrical engineer. Most of the stuff I've used to put together the String-Circle (or Wave-Circle) "Model". was gotten from older EE texts. :-) > I teach myself physics as time > permits. That's the best way, otherwise you could become an aesthetic or a philosopher. > I do find it interesting that you arrived at a Z 377 ohms (the > exact impedance for a pi circular radiating element.) This is more then > coincidence? No coincidence, the intrinsic impedance of the aether (uo/eo)^1/2 is also 377 ohms. > IF this is true I think you could attenuate G with a simple > bowel shaped superconductor like a hunk of chain link fence will attenuate > a cell phone signal. This could be experimental proof. Gravity shielding with chicken wire, Charles? Hmmm :-) Best, Frederick > Charlie Ford > KC5-OWZ > cjford1 yahoo.com > cjford1 swbell.net > > _________________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get your free yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Jun 23 04:35:06 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id EAA13325; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 04:34:29 -0700 Resent-Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 04:34:29 -0700 Message-ID: <003901c0fbda$0b3d8f80$ae92cbc1 pc> From: "Noel Whitney" To: Subject: ceramic engines Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 12:45:46 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0036_01C0FBE2.6C8C7960" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 Resent-Message-ID: <"A7i4F.0.7G3.4x7Dx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43323 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0036_01C0FBE2.6C8C7960 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I was searching the web re the above and finally decided -what am I = doing - Ask my friends and collegues in Vortex! Can anyone give me some pointers on where to find manufacturers of = Ceramic Engines ( Single or twin cylinder types) in the smaller sizes ( = 1 to 5 HP) I am getting nowhere . Or components such as ceramic pistons/ Cylinders.-small sizes 25 to 50mm = dia. Am I correct in understanding that some manufacturers make High pressure = washers with the above ? or do they use a Swashplate type system ot ABC = -like model aircraft engines ( Alloy/Brass/Chrome) in their rotary to = Linear configuration.? Who has investigated the pros/cons of -for a given bang ! is it better = to convert by crank and con rod to rotary motion or is a swashplate = capable of working in reverse ? Any help appreciated. _______________________________________________________ Noel D. Whitney Quantum Leap Limited 52 Watson Road, Killiney, Co Dublin, Ireland. Tel: 00 353 1 2854626 why not visit our website at: www.quantumleap.ie ------=_NextPart_000_0036_01C0FBE2.6C8C7960 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I was searching the web re the above = and finally=20 decided -what am I doing - Ask my friends and collegues in = Vortex!
 
Can anyone give me some pointers on = where to find=20 manufacturers of Ceramic Engines ( Single or twin cylinder types) in the = smaller=20 sizes ( 1 to 5 HP) I am getting nowhere .
Or components such as ceramic pistons/=20 Cylinders.-small sizes 25 to 50mm dia.
 
Am I correct in understanding that some = manufacturers make High pressure washers with the above ? or do they use = a=20 Swashplate type system ot ABC -like model aircraft engines ( = Alloy/Brass/Chrome)=20 in their rotary to Linear configuration.?
 
Who has investigated the pros/cons of = -for a given=20 bang ! is it better to convert by crank and con rod to rotary motion or = is a=20 swashplate capable of working in reverse ?
 
Any help appreciated.
_______________________________________________________
Noel = D.=20 Whitney
Quantum Leap Limited
52 Watson Road,
Killiney,
Co=20 Dublin,
Ireland.
Tel: 00 353 1 2854626
why not visit our = website at: www.quantumleap.ie
------=_NextPart_000_0036_01C0FBE2.6C8C7960-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Jun 23 07:29:21 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id HAA10471; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 07:28:57 -0700 Resent-Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 07:28:57 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Sender: mjones pop.jump.net Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 09:22:08 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Mitchell Jones Subject: Re: Prospecting for Uranium Resent-Message-ID: <"MET_71.0.SZ2.eUADx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43324 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: >In reply to Mitchell Jones's message of Sat, 23 Jun 2001 00:00:58 >-0500: > >>Do any of you have any experience at uranium prospecting? What would be the >>best equipment to use? Any specific recommendations? --MJ >[snip] >Yes, get in touch with Bruce Perreault, who has already done it. ***{Thanks Robin. I mucked about with a search engine for awhile, and found http://www.nuenergy.org/overview.htm. The contact address given was nuenergy cyberportal.net, which I assume will take an e-mail to Bruce Perreault. Does that sound right to you? --MJ}*** >Regards, > >Robin van Spaandonk > >http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ ________________ Quote of the month: "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value--i.e., zero." --Voltaire From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Jun 23 12:42:24 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id MAA21193; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 12:41:40 -0700 Resent-Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 12:41:40 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 14:41:10 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: thomas malloy Subject: Re: Prospecting for Uranium Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Resent-Message-ID: <"_2P_l3.0.3B5.p3FDx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43325 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: I was reading the other day that if you grind up 100 tons of granite and process it you can recover 5 pounds of uranium. I had no idea that it was so plentiful. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Jun 23 14:29:18 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id OAA18607; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 14:28:35 -0700 Resent-Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 14:28:35 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Sender: mjones pop.jump.net Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 16:24:15 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Mitchell Jones Subject: Re: Prospecting for Uranium Resent-Message-ID: <"fcz2M2.0.fY4.2eGDx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43326 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: >I was reading the other day that if you grind up 100 tons of granite >and process it you can recover 5 pounds of uranium. I had no idea >that it was so plentiful. ***{Yup, I've read that lots of places. Here's one of them: "Uranium is found in small quantities in granite, which is one of the principal rock materials. If the rich deposits of uranium were used up, it would be economically feasible to recover it from granite; the mining operation would be of the same magnitude as present coal-mining operations and would provide sufficient energy for billions of years." [*Concepts of Nuclear Physics*, by Bernard Cohen, pg. 407] Bottom line: we ain't ever gonna run out of uranium, regardless of the future availability of fossil fuels. (This civilization may collapse due to lack of *access* to nuclear energy, of course--e.g., thanks to the mindless crusades of the green Nazis--but that's another kettle of fish altogether.) --Mitchell Jones}*** ________________ Quote of the month: "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value--i.e., zero." --Voltaire From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Jun 23 15:59:08 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id PAA09804; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 15:58:32 -0700 Resent-Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 15:58:32 -0700 From: Robin van Spaandonk To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Getting Closer to Grand Unified? Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 08:57:53 +1000 Organization: Improving Message-ID: References: <4.2.0.58.20010622223919.0095d8d0 postoffice.swbell.net> <01e501c0fbc4$85ac5780$b28f85ce@computer> In-Reply-To: <01e501c0fbc4$85ac5780$b28f85ce computer> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id PAA09777 Resent-Message-ID: <"aT03W3.0.6P2.OyHDx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43327 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: In reply to Frederick Sparber's message of Sat, 23 Jun 2001 04:10:36 -0500: [snip] >> IF this is true I think you could attenuate G with a simple >> bowel shaped superconductor like a hunk of chain link fence will attenuate >> a cell phone signal. This could be experimental proof. > >Gravity shielding with chicken wire, Charles? Hmmm :-) [snip] There may be more to this than you think. Some of the newer optics devices consist primarily of little "posts" separated by the wavelength of the light with which they are designed to interact. Perhaps strange effects would obtain if the same were done at the gravity wavelength? Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Jun 23 16:04:48 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id QAA10856; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 16:04:24 -0700 Resent-Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 16:04:24 -0700 From: Robin van Spaandonk To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: An interesting anomaly - final Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 09:03:49 +1000 Organization: Improving Message-ID: References: <3b32a39e.199227754@mail.midiowa.net> <36o7jt8h394bju8vlebelr9ik1mi2bm8p4@4ax.com> In-Reply-To: <36o7jt8h394bju8vlebelr9ik1mi2bm8p4 4ax.com> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id QAA10831 Resent-Message-ID: <"ndzjt2.0.Uf2.t1IDx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43328 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: In reply to Robin van Spaandonk's message of Sat, 23 Jun 2001 10:31:12 +1000: Last night when the effect occurred again, I repeated the measurements, and this time the high voltage contact measured line voltage. This leads me to the conclusion that I have a switch that is correctly wired, though leaks a low current at all times, and when moist leaks sufficient to induce a weak light in the tube. Because the DVM has a high impedance, it was able to measure the voltage in both cases. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Jun 23 16:06:29 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id QAA11470; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 16:06:08 -0700 Resent-Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 16:06:08 -0700 From: Robin van Spaandonk To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: ceramic engines Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 09:05:31 +1000 Organization: Improving Message-ID: References: <003901c0fbda$0b3d8f80$ae92cbc1 pc> In-Reply-To: <003901c0fbda$0b3d8f80$ae92cbc1 pc> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id QAA11383 Resent-Message-ID: <"aV4u82.0.-o2.V3IDx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43329 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: In reply to Noel Whitney's message of Sat, 23 Jun 2001 12:45:46 +0100: >I was searching the web re the above and finally decided -what am I doing - Ask my friends and collegues in Vortex! > >Can anyone give me some pointers on where to find manufacturers of Ceramic Engines ( Single or twin cylinder types) in the smaller sizes ( 1 to 5 HP) I am getting nowhere . [snip] As far as I know no one has yet succeeded in getting this technology to the point where it is a commercial proposition. IOW I think you are looking for something that doesn't exist. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Jun 23 17:32:35 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id RAA03047; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 17:31:52 -0700 Resent-Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 17:31:52 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: rick mail.highsurf.com Message-Id: Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 14:31:38 -1000 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Rick Monteverde Subject: Standing waves for mass reduction effects Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Resent-Message-ID: <"3YKVc1.0.Ml.tJJDx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43330 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: More Standing wave gravity nullification claims: http://www.electrogravity.com/index16.html - Rick Monteverde Honolulu, HI From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Jun 23 18:28:35 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id SAA16330; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 18:25:17 -0700 Resent-Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 18:25:17 -0700 Message-ID: <023501c0fc44$10ccb240$b28f85ce computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: Cc: References: <4.2.0.58.20010622223919.0095d8d0 postoffice.swbell.net> <01e501c0fbc4$85ac5780$b28f85ce@computer> Subject: Re: Getting Closer to Grand Unified? Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 19:24:07 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Resent-Message-ID: <"sJc0j2.0.4_3.y5KDx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43331 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: ----- Original Message ----- From: "Robin van Spaandonk" To: Sent: Saturday, June 23, 2001 5:57 PM Subject: Re: Getting Closer to Grand Unified? Robin wrote: > Charles Ford wrote: > In reply to Frederick Sparber's message of Sat, 23 Jun 2001 04:10:36 > -0500: > [snip] > >> IF this is true I think you could attenuate G with a simple > >> bowel shaped superconductor like a hunk of chain link fence will attenuate > >> a cell phone signal. This could be experimental proof. > > > >Gravity shielding with chicken wire, Charles? Hmmm :-) > [snip] > There may be more to this than you think. Some of the newer optics > devices consist primarily of little "posts" separated by the wavelength > of the light with which they are designed to interact. Perhaps strange > effects would obtain if the same were done at the gravity wavelength? True. Butt, "Bowel Shaped Superconductors" are stretching things a bit. :-) Regards, Frederick > > > Regards, > > Robin van Spaandonk > > http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Jun 23 18:57:06 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id SAA26241; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 18:56:36 -0700 Resent-Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 18:56:36 -0700 Message-ID: <024301c0fc48$7520c2a0$b28f85ce computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: Cc: References: Subject: Re: Standing waves for mass reduction effects Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 19:56:04 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Resent-Message-ID: <"tcNhq3.0.sP6.KZKDx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43332 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rick Monteverde" To: Sent: Saturday, June 23, 2001 7:31 PM Subject: Standing waves for mass reduction effects Rick wrote: > More Standing wave gravity nullification claims: > > http://www.electrogravity.com/index16.html > Thanks for posting this, Rick. In the mid 80s I had some ideas along similar lines, and former astronaut "Deke" Slayton, head of Space Services Inc. in Houston, sent an engineer up to go over them. I don't know whether or not they ever got around to doing any experiments though. Regards, Frederick > > - Rick Monteverde > Honolulu, HI > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Jun 23 19:01:38 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id TAA27579; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 19:00:58 -0700 Resent-Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 19:00:58 -0700 Message-ID: <025601c0fc49$0bebf880$b28f85ce computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: Cc: Subject: Re: Deke Slayton Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 19:59:44 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/related; type="multipart/alternative"; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0001_01C0FC1F.0C867CE0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Resent-Message-ID: <"RW1at.0.rk6.PdKDx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43333 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C0FC1F.0C867CE0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_001_0002_01C0FC1F.0C8FA4A0" ------=_NextPart_001_0002_01C0FC1F.0C8FA4A0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 93-043.DOC Barbara Schwartz June 13, 1993 RELEASE: 93-043 MERCURY ASTRONAUT DONALD K. "DEKE" SLAYTON DECEASED Donald K. "Deke" Slayton, 69, one of the United States' original seven = astronauts selected by NASA for the Mercury Program in 1959, died=20 June 13, 1993, of complications of a brain tumor. Born March 1, 1924, in Sparta, Wi., Slayton flew as Apollo docking = module pilot for the Apollo-Soyuz Test Project in 1975, a joint United = States-Soviet Union space flight that culminated in the first and only = meeting to date in space of astronauts and cosmonauts. Slayton was named = by NASA as an astronaut in April 1959, and was originally scheduled to = pilot the Mercury-Atlas 7 mission, an assignment that was later changed = due to a diagnosed heart condition. The mission was subsequently flown = by M. Scott Carpenter in May 1962. Slayton went on to become chief of astronaut activities in September = 1962 and was responsible for the operations of the astronaut office. In = November 1963, he resigned a commission as an Air Force Major to become = Director of Flight Crew Operations for NASA, responsible for directing = activities of the astronaut office, aircraft operations office, flight = crew integration division, crew training and simulation division, and = crew procedures division. In March 1972, Slayton was restored to full flight status and certified = eligible for space flight following a review of his medical status by = NASA's director of life sciences and the Federal Aviation = Administration. His fellow crew members for Apollo-Soyuz were Thomas P. = Stafford and Vance D. Brand. - more - - 2 - In December 1975, Slayton became manager for the Space Shuttle Program's = Approach and Landing Test Project. As manager, Slayton directed the = project, which included five landings by the test orbiter Enterprise, = dropped from a carrier airplane to simulate the final 20,000 feet of a = shuttle landing. The project checked out the shuttle's flight control = systems and evaluated its subsonic flying qualities. >From November 1977 through February 1982, Slayton was manager of the = Space Shuttle's Orbital Flight Test Project, directing preparations for = and overseeing operations of the first two shuttle missions. His = responsibilities included scheduling, mission configuration, mission = readiness reviews, postflight mission evaluations and ferry operations = with the 747 Shuttle Carrier Aircraft. Slayton retired from NASA in February 1982. At the time of his death, he = served as president of Space Services, Inc., Houston, and as a = consultant to several aerospace corporations, among other positions. Among the orginal seven astronauts, Slayton was preceded in death by = Virgil I. "Gus" Grissom, killed in an Apollo spacecraft fire on the = launch pad Jan. 27, 1967. Slayton is survived by his wife, Bobbie, and = son, Kent. Slayton entered the Air Force as an aviation cadet, receiving his wings = in April 1943. During World War II, he flew 56 combat missions over = Europe as a B-25 pilot. He returned to the U.S. in 1944 and served as a = B-25 instructor pilot. In 1945, he was sent to Okinawa and flew seven = combat missions over Japan. He later left the Air Force to attend the = University of Minnesota, receiving a bachelor of science degree in = aeronautical engineering in 1949. In 1951, he was recalled to active = duty by the Minnesota Air National Guard, assigned as a maintenance = flight test officer of an F-51 squadron in Minneapolis. After two overseas assignments, Slayton attended the Air Force Test = Pilot School in 1955 at Edwards Air Force Base, Calif. He served as a = test pilot at Edwards from January 1956 to April 1959, when he was named = an astronaut. Slayton's honors include the NASA Exceptional Service Medal; two NASA = Outstanding Leadership Medals; four NASA Distinguished Service Medals; = the Collier Trophy; the SETP Iven C. Kincheloe Award; the General Billy = Mitchell Award; the SETP J.H. Doolittle Award for 1972; the National=20 - more - - 3 - Institute of Social Science's Gold Medal in 1975; the Wright Brothers = International Manned Space Flight Award in 1975; the Veterans of Foreign = Wars National Space Award in 1976; the Federation Aeronautique = Internationale's Yuri Gagarin Gold Medal in 1976; the American Heart = Association's Heart of the Year Award in 1976; the American Institute of = Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA) Special Presidential Citation in = 1977; the Houston Area's Federal Business Association's Civil Servant of = the Year Award in 1977; and the AIAA Haley Astronautics Award in 1978, = among others. --end-- ------=_NextPart_001_0002_01C0FC1F.0C8FA4A0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 93-043.DOC
 

Barbara Schwartz June 13, 1993

RELEASE: 93-043

MERCURY ASTRONAUT DONALD K. "DEKE" SLAYTON DECEASED

Donald K. "Deke" Slayton, 69, one of the United States' original = seven=20 astronauts selected by NASA for the Mercury Program in 1959, died=20

June 13, 1993, of complications of a brain tumor.

Born March 1, 1924, in Sparta, Wi., Slayton flew as Apollo docking = module=20 pilot for the Apollo-Soyuz Test Project in 1975, a joint United = States-Soviet=20 Union space flight that culminated in the first and only meeting to date = in=20 space of astronauts and cosmonauts. Slayton was named by NASA as an = astronaut in=20 April 1959, and was originally scheduled to pilot the Mercury-Atlas 7 = mission,=20 an assignment that was later changed due to a diagnosed heart condition. = The=20 mission was subsequently flown by M. Scott Carpenter in May 1962.

Slayton went on to become chief of astronaut activities in September = 1962 and=20 was responsible for the operations of the astronaut office. In November = 1963, he=20 resigned a commission as an Air Force Major to become Director of Flight = Crew=20 Operations for NASA, responsible for directing activities of the = astronaut=20 office, aircraft operations office, flight crew integration division, = crew=20 training and simulation division, and crew procedures division.

In March 1972, Slayton was restored to full flight status and = certified=20 eligible for space flight following a review of his medical status by = NASA's=20 director of life sciences and the Federal Aviation Administration. His = fellow=20 crew members for Apollo-Soyuz were Thomas P. Stafford and Vance D. = Brand.

- more -

- 2 -

In December 1975, Slayton became manager for the Space Shuttle = Program's=20 Approach and Landing Test Project. As manager, Slayton directed the = project,=20 which included five landings by the test orbiter Enterprise, dropped = from a=20 carrier airplane to simulate the final 20,000 feet of a shuttle landing. = The=20 project checked out the shuttle's flight control systems and evaluated = its=20 subsonic flying qualities.

From November 1977 through February 1982, Slayton was manager of the = Space=20 Shuttle's Orbital Flight Test Project, directing preparations for and = overseeing=20 operations of the first two shuttle missions. His responsibilities = included=20 scheduling, mission configuration, mission readiness reviews, postflight = mission=20 evaluations and ferry operations with the 747 Shuttle Carrier Aircraft.

Slayton retired from NASA in February 1982. At the time of his death, = he=20 served as president of Space Services, Inc., Houston, and as a = consultant to=20 several aerospace corporations, among other positions.

Among the orginal seven astronauts, Slayton was preceded in death by = Virgil=20 I. "Gus" Grissom, killed in an Apollo spacecraft fire on the launch pad = Jan. 27,=20 1967. Slayton is survived by his wife, Bobbie, and son, Kent.

Slayton entered the Air Force as an aviation cadet, receiving his = wings in=20 April 1943. During World War II, he flew 56 combat missions over Europe = as a=20 B-25 pilot. He returned to the U.S. in 1944 and served as a B-25 = instructor=20 pilot. In 1945, he was sent to Okinawa and flew seven combat missions = over=20 Japan. He later left the Air Force to attend the University of = Minnesota,=20 receiving a bachelor of science degree in aeronautical engineering in = 1949. In=20 1951, he was recalled to active duty by the Minnesota Air National = Guard,=20 assigned as a maintenance flight test officer of an F-51 squadron in=20 Minneapolis.

After two overseas assignments, Slayton attended the Air Force Test = Pilot=20 School in 1955 at Edwards Air Force Base, Calif. He served as a test = pilot at=20 Edwards from January 1956 to April 1959, when he was named an astronaut.

Slayton's honors include the NASA Exceptional Service Medal; two NASA = Outstanding Leadership Medals; four NASA Distinguished Service Medals; = the=20 Collier Trophy; the SETP Iven C. Kincheloe Award; the General Billy = Mitchell=20 Award; the SETP J.H. Doolittle Award for 1972; the National=20

- more -

- 3 -

Institute of Social Science's Gold Medal in 1975; the Wright Brothers = International Manned Space Flight Award in 1975; the Veterans of Foreign = Wars=20 National Space Award in 1976; the Federation Aeronautique = Internationale's Yuri=20 Gagarin Gold Medal in 1976; the American Heart Association's Heart of = the Year=20 Award in 1976; the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics = (AIAA)=20 Special Presidential Citation in 1977; the Houston Area's Federal = Business=20 Association's Civil Servant of the Year Award in 1977; and the AIAA = Haley=20 Astronautics Award in 1978, among others.

--end--

------=_NextPart_001_0002_01C0FC1F.0C8FA4A0-- ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C0FC1F.0C867CE0 Content-Type: image/gif; name="nasanews.gif" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Location: http://www.jsc.nasa.gov/pao/gifs/nasanews.gif R0lGODlh+AF4APcAAP///8W8xXNzc5t6k72ltIytzuaTk8WkrMbG1uaDi1pjnFl6tNZJQnOMvVlS hNWkpKy03eabm/a0mzExMUJCQlJSUmNjY3t7e4yMjBAQECEhIZyt1u+9rebFxa2trb29vc7Ozt7e 3pycnLSbpN5aYudzY0lqrEmDtGuUvXqkxRBSlChRk4SUxpSlzmJqm5uTtJylxvbNzdZCSdZSWZRS Ypy11qTF3fe8pf/Gtc1yevbN1TljpUpjnHpRcoxSajhRi0pShO6bpO+traxZYr1jY+abi/aki+bd 5ufn93Jqm3N7pfbFxf/VxcVqasV6cmJRenJRct20rNW0vMZCScZSUoN6m4uDpJxSYqRJWVmLvGOE tff3/7RJUbxBSTFrpTlzrb17e7yDg6RZaq1jaihZmyBim+bV1ffn7//39++Da++Mc9ZaUt5ZSrTN 3bzF3efv9+/v7//u5//3791qct1yevbd3f/d1dXd7tXm7s04QdU4Qe+1te+1vMXN5sXV5u7Vze7V 1f/n5//n7gAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACwAAAAA+AF4AAAI/wABBIqh I4bBgmgAKFzIUOFAggZjJGxIkeHBiAgraqSIRggdGXn05AkZkoSBOhtTLkSDEaNKlXA+BPgQ4mXF EDNB2NzJs6fPn0CDCh1KtKjRo0iTUowwsunICC+ZOs0Tg2edqU33AEWTAKtIrHOqAhWCdeQZoR8G qdUA5+cFtRSUyp1Lt67du3jz5pU6VcbZlHybirXZteycnzFAjvzKuOnXPHQm9mRQNk8QtGrVCnAL V6/nz6BDixbtp0aBFCdMlPGSukABG2/sMhXZ+DBgkiQHv8RNu6lkmx0eL576uDeJLT2vDmc8A3Pm QR98vh0Ud7T169iza1/YBkUZFeDDf/8PH95LijtzAxf/cxt3ng47gw+fz4FnIMXuG893SqKngf2P xRFUWs9NIF1n2yWo4IIMAuVHFmSQJ+EOqqkwHnnmIYdUBPp91d9GszmmW0qFFbfYhzbN4dh+APKW hwE8UWYiSTACRSB1al3Q03TVNejjj0Bu90YWEo5nZBkRiiehhQVoGBQadCgklXAkPQDiilTZhEaL Tgn4knJUptGBgHIAEEMClO3HwG8bycfiSM3ZmNkRGahlBk88BqnnnnzatUUK5F0oqJIWlvHdheCV UYNQCWgFAIdY0ramRiEKZtMeTs2Yh5Uv/bciAzpsREeawzmqUomZ4obSTzcCgMFaeCL/2OestNbK kw1LWhhookqWwQILO/BK3hd4/BSBDAvxpd9ICVA6nx7wvURHfrzpgWJKJLiXR33YamubSviFRCpJ zbKamUIU5LhTnra26667BaiQ5KGEgvdFA0wm+uug9JbhR0+YQiUllfsFUlGlIo1Y0RkuMqAGVgar lGoeXrapHwMvYeoemu5hbK5aCoVQ5yB3vsTuTiAEUFODMn2g07swJ7gFCrkKq2vNKuyAaM027ISp DJJN6SJJ1yaLlcIUBUGcAR08W2NK1NoUtUrT0ucpbkt8PMhCrw6igU0nbxSCACNnNsEFTjbkwQUX HKGSCGwToNIHbJfMUAgXTPAcXBik/x3z355t8UWvN98M6HdfmGAzr/0Ki0JUIQk88MTuRctQiF8h 3VC27lVFqkgeQ60ttyqVKUeZL23ZMQBXFRelTwGcu1C6g+ioUtgUwTHd3pllYHtDXWOg0sgGpkT7 ylyXzfsgGXgA+PN5CY7zzl9skGiwXiy+5M6Pa8TVSN9KuZ8EqbKxVKqWaxRHqh6jOtKqG83w7HtK aUySHuWm+VXoPLW6kMh2up2scqc3tZxtJgQQQAEHYQGKHGGAFAHBc/zGEDjAiiEiyIwGLuCBD9DN AmVzHvRGOBfF6YpeKjhBFlpQgMGpAF8SohmhUDhDFSyKI5xjwF+SZaIOuC8PkhNfcf80ZzT31IgP WCnXRgrjohlEAH5EUZFwuHW1r6TPJv7j2gU3gruFwKGAEwhARTwwst8tpIBt0cjuBiHCimRwEJv5 X2aElzsLqCUDqCOhHosCKO0VAAAQKEALIPAGCAzOSLtaHA0v9C+GdAA/V3zUfpgQh8/lQYeX2w8R FSK/FYlFdb3hX0WQSKXHMIAOQogkTxg2n9C5iVw+yeLs1MVFCC5EAAZMY0VAMDK7KWQ6baRIujSg lgZqpAJqeZlC7Fg742lmj9AUSg1sNh4U3CFY4SFDA/oAgezV6wtEqlfhElUG9AAASoxR4uV6CABP PUadCKNKHikCpqbwT0WZUiVD5Nf/mzeJZA4G2GRFlMab1ylERl3qiSxD1staUqciBMqALjVCoOIt RIIPrYgF4ai3DGxkiwopoNs28kCvRfOkPcGDsASFhAXUjAVvaMFKLTQvcSJSBV8wUyfB56zOHRRL gwlMSPSpECbS5mkA4MD9mKWSOlhyfh1LgEAXwrnhpM+oIyEdFmUHPJA2pIsAQOYgRGATsSJPIcT0 6BjV4gFcDmKkansmQ7i6keOh9K4qqVCRcHoH8DQgWAtwKXh20IY+7KyG1CQPGXKwoqKtM1NiiYG2 1sDD+WwSoZZaCXHy8KWnUstbUKxIPUciSlI6JnwvWegsm1mRLobAqxvxgFrouBBm/8qNIm4FgGzH WhFmKlMhIzsrRNkGV7wadyF+IFx4TtCH8JigehvApl+3INib1gtR3+kBlmYwz4YIbSSWwydjHPVd PRDxlaCjiBQdQ9SFxIFjXMJSU7RKkSoytSH6a0p3U6JahgaQIl18YxxtAsHdGrMhdapOMStSp681 pIAVOK6EfXLIvapgAc21Fxl2gM0LaWELMLzZIgnlACoIRw9xAlFx9MCEhSgHN5OqFHiXuB+kKkSp 8ynBTs4ggaqemHJZ0ghmQ0JfADCRJJfZSX8V0jUHf9WWzIzOTjpKkQY7kJbpUitDdjtgLRZzohMO M0VwhdgLQ0BCNb3ZF0A8zuuCR/8BU1AMcyBXOYb8RzgwUlZINLclEynsDDPab0riwAEDrIFaMxLl QnQwsYpo7DEpTi1dhUlLhnSxgBTcSAEpItbfAuCNYgTAdHwJALd6OqS9s0Awxcxqbx72O17oa+EO Cx4TvCHE1h1PD7ogXz0QwSaQEhFD5PDUQMhYno7GkqI5SaUi8yQGRSgB5b5iKob8UA0VkUOkKja3 STcEgBkorqhtSczlmXtv4n6jGcPKvIUQiLbANWlFtrDAzFDgAqRmNV6TSzhEAcCmIh7sHXC9pB7I QM4rukIZgL2fKz76RA/Qj+bWuxgGzKEJJZjDxTPeyd6gNigdSEOvPw4A/HxlBhj/3/gcSEBxkgQx JbEDWUq61qNf2vLcOM+MlL1oQAQPIsILUQvQFWIGuWpEBPXuXQVCre+79pHW48GDYANu0zvI8GY7 oEG49gMF8DQSMCtucUNmQKU5sJMj8n2WphYjaKDUYQb5zUOkFdI0RIeEYO6Z+0aWzJACwruLmWGb 4AdPeMKLGwB2VQhG4Y1MLQOAmfmOIAYqoDwDnrrpJPTmTHm1gXi5OZFlQIIWwqMALDQF4Vfgwkgc EJ4U0PkxkZQsVBkj9oYodUalTNVXhECRM0QkIjtMieznQxGsvmn279uqzFOC0XAvpIsjO0rwnv9f JquF6VTuSQg8QPnnkBXze1Rp/2IL9wUkjJ/qtX6DCXwQ577kAQtQ4DUXfoChqJwYaaNKuxUr4uPN /ng/lOVdSbQTANIQ2vZZSzU0jmFjFOVtrSUrXUQ7hwcUr/Vzs+RkikdLFXhgP+EB5eZ84EdCnidO wvIGU4ddieUAOcAEJgISV/ADTzASPpBIxdIej4E06/N/JFF7C8FKuBcpXBJa9uMUNnGAMNYQ9qMp yzI/y0YRfPdgs2VzGcUQzLRqQoFGALBRHBhv1dE1VtgTX2R0Ifg8JxAhq+EaLHAaFvIFBZCGEHBm FpIFC3ACc2hCieIAWscAJXADN0AZItcFPbACPHAFesAGSrAAKPQdfwR2K6JP3/+lLQoTbAi4hCbC ewzxYsNhibdRHHM3LUroFQgYWhDlgLt0R27TRdPRZSkREzOhEW5FVrv1fQxBO6jmeAxBN23zErtl UWMIOC5kIeakEIpDBkgAAG6wAwDgQj3DENmjADTAawygMGbAeioABFSQB2owESEWHot4JbzBg2PH JXpQZB3XFCXABB1gEB2AjjGQjgYhcq1EEUM2EtVGEUg0PgzBMPpRBDGAA+voju2IjkxwaK4jactn Mp3RRUXXbjaxixqBUQ3kVsLlKmpBAFqoRmL4UQfZizEjLA3AELL2R/ESSOCxAA0RBVPwGGInB0bw AGeRYVAwBXmAAwyRYfRyAir/IYkzphFuMiPg2Dor4mwNAQheEVrlBT5RAEUxsAdNoAcmgkkLQVAr wm0aQRbx2G0bqRJ+B1Z+ZxO0I4sUkVYAUCe8uBAlJQBv9IUAEHMYqJG2yJHvIiEmyRCA0gIAIFM7 sAURYpcMEQjDYT50R38mAAAssAKEyAUKQBHSZSE4aYOLsUnZsoRXZHxNKI8JaGNoUI6OQTBOySJF EI6NoWMvwUrz0V4A8IQRdEfMVHML8UYZEHkYBFtUOFt1oooLQUwT0HgpMTJguVZTCJfvIn7jMZcL oZd/xALgAQEtAAR3YgcMIW0h4QQMgQT4UgAvIJMzyAIAUIwLwQIolFOMOByb/4SJSwWO/OQUBnUq WKFoTpV2CdgiRbM++yGUllkc6jSKWSlAz8GaZ5QZE+luI3NbGrFbI6OWzLRgDvWaGwEHBQqcMcNv umKSfcAQG2CXMgUEYsAGGFMHonljNPAE4EERITAEdkAFQAAeE0qc27kkOdlwKnFnWJI+6DVU8dFP IgGOAKADJqctQ/MVbNBd7jQcVLkRQUpaQ3qLpJgS9cafRDcyGdA3DQEHbsVAL6E8mfZpz6GWChGG atGbCvEBaWUgV+qgfAKhJQkAC8CdCgEBAHAAKTkSOkY+FaOX4cGXCoEDlHEDIwgAfdUGDOFC45GT J4ajBhh3IUGTC/FDlVkRT/+Vnu6FTy6ydi/CqFjRoV8yNPR5mkm6EQtpSxelPGfDNrSDoCoxqkwa Mr3zEiFQbsxzb2xjAaw6Af9JprOSXDcJACYwmA1hBE5RHyOQBH66ENvYAEhQByK3Bi22BcGSBQBg PSoKh7rSonWmEhG3H+yxEE91n+opHJUZA1UFVSSRBqLIOssxElEwGalCcu62qQ71mxSxBVPKPHuj AfCWErvFWhpRQFuoEXBwoMvjO2BGq7Uia+Fhki6FALuaB1cABT8QGxXRXBfSA5RhBAtRSCqwARqx BWqmEg+xjgZxpBRhEDjwBxzABByQR3LQjuqIjiCrEXUgkP8YA2MKAHEgAQb/QALjwgAkUAQSMKa+ t7LryCZNFQMwywSbxIo7BzsycXlRKgIVQAEjQwEW4KWr6EEBELAMAQIeNKs3cQEUwKpSKwIzK7B9 IiwmOQBdEIALAQPOBQBbEFMtUIMKgU0IoHpcAATaqRB9AALlBwB9sLdqCgCjx5isZjpke7iIKxSK JTfkMwUHwBDQ+kctEAIjyRDI6QOUUQQsFIwLsE1+Gx4fyR3LlbikW7pkOzg7cAVpsBBJIC8OK4wq kLd3YAJnwAJbIBl/wAV6UAJUKXUqoKtIsALg4QYNIVjdaLrIm7yYpwSH2QP0Rx47sAAmEFjB8gVT 92FJYgJgoAdT0AN3sAIL/yBILGCHO6CcJuBNgTW90qs4ZXC8yvu+8ItSaMAhXECNyrUrSQIeG9BX QKC781cz+WsCcHhY+Su38XvACPw8x5IAUpBIFoaC4HEHYSAD3evA+Tseb1CSwVIGG5woXpDAIBzC 7kIHCfAX2cMv2jNrP6C7a3Ci44ddNYBNg+MFEDB1KuB6IpzDOjwrfdRmKMwrDjASYwBIZqg9RkIG Jpic8gIBHawCwbjDUBzFC2Km1jVO30EGppcHrMems2thHhwhDSBTvPIFWpAkH6yqF6BLHjQ3SRtL bfxpb6wXIUC1SCECXCvFeIwUJ/x5umIeDsBrWCC838GmGjtrarYaJDke2v/UAOPBrC8ROwfGNkdH VmscFJLcEBowdHoBApsxx3ZBAXGcx6JsFGQ2a4CaTT4wEl2HKBuAAINSM2FMgl7wuvxFARMgZZd8 mlIWAhZQASHwy1tKE+4GACDwW1qbRrmsEB4AQvMUAh+QRr8MzKepTCAAB858N8KchS8DB9WMARNQ zcpUyV96ecccMiEQE7rkzF/EdKPczkfxi9YLHuGUKCugel3wvG2mSAEHAYN7ykyiZKDsYJK8qhMA tXOsARoANzpCRlAbRww0ARkQR1ALtc6TzGHVVrIoAhkAtWTltRNgxxowASKNHBNgARMQ0r+00Rqw GR9QHS0NAhAtAC2dhSL/LdLWrNKsedIULWoVINIZUBOy9bUawM7uXNRCYavkcQId5gVKABI0kFgj Nk5ZECwEK72BMrbuFhcVoCOSLAJ0JABczdXCkwE6IQcaEB2DIDwPRMzG5AFxkcwMSszFs6ptIUG6 Ux0VQEdbjXhAlwFiRAFtYUGn6dJxMdMzndcKkdcXEEcWQM1t/dZs8Xg6QtbEDB1GfdlDcQI2Q8bg 4QB60AUn6gXVtT1rmEINUGEWAgHISQa+QpL/DNBuqwFHcAF0FAAXAEJhLWoXEAAWJclboxC/jTcK 9NZmJAIb9BY14bWCN9SXPAhpNNOgjC5iBAcY4LVbM9ODnd0zPQhpEwAZ/zC1YCbcBa3bv3QBINAj 0Y3Z6u0T4icsweIDenAFwmsvoCcev9gAbWgDbgAB23hhiQKeOxEAXeiqorZBCSQ8ksw2Av58OvLb AHDdES0CIkDcfQfWXovgrso2eGM7Dj7TYYQuz/zdGCBB2a3dhR0XDv4/k2fZXxrhE07eur3gIL7e NH4r40QGhDiDO6B5m02CuXJTh2LAqYXeZ4N4UrbXCZ7GEhVSd+LgW3PJGEDhIeNkMA0ABFAdW+DL 1R1SUiYAwkMBoQbK2E3iH1A8XmviAHDLv9RWuPw7UC7lbCMHzp2FGRDKNX7ndMkrZKC7XZczXxAh I6grmk3aRrwkT4xFPf8iQVx9NhTQ6NvXPJIsABv0tMAddGvpOxbwtbb9OxjQZRpQE7l5ARrQQJdM RgJANm2R3qDMoKcO0R7AoBUw3ADwWjIdF2R02xJ165IOV95921AbAFtO3mTjtWeN58a+EYO+53mA zz++V0B+v/TivjbBzVk7UmtTzRdQEzQRAtZ+AbK4c1JGN3KDAR9wBMhTzVmbRnAjQtJMzLSdRuhO zG2BN2LrAWSFN6/+MsVM7e6OAaiDi+Im7q6iMitzBN1+BPF+7ApfnH/OBf9bxGVoxYQOetbVPQt/ 8RdvBl0QyCu1Ad6pz4a8M88VKI6M8SZv7IlhADKEKFYN7c3uwyqwjCf/P/M0jil8oBCB/sMAB8FH Eqw0//OXvQcyAEU2ENWbJ/ESTyxFIaW5ScdHke0QRdQUIQIT6MlEYfVAn/U8IfTjenWvbMhIf0Iy TxQHRAATYJtHwUv1Wt5v859Yn7Vo3xCcPOtOr/V2zxB8EHwNsQWDDvYgLyjti9VKZlGvpc2neVbi nIUuc4uRB9a8GBMbTsxycM2Hr3jIER3FrBByEM46Qd3fzM38Xs6eX812s/iKZ812fveqz6cnwOMg P2sZkhS8RNRlbssZcO8hbdDErNIN9EUnPQF+I1GyylC/ryMU0NOjXtDNY+QPbtIRnd2r+rUTYAYx XeZnn+YaQNEwHdFl/z7rIT3SaW7SKL365F8RNoACe/z6X5ACQo4UF5ABGZDXbZEWd2IGEuXVCgHW AKABnf+aiA0QACoIAFAQgIcKADAQBEABAwA5Gi40JAhn0IeDFABMCABg0MMjgwB80HiBoQUQJEdm gAMAhIWCHjSqDKCxwkOBEykkBKABo0GgQYUOJVrU6FGkSZUuZdrU6VOoUaVOpVoVapsCWU+cKPNl a1Ybb6weBSGCwoSRaAtyHHnBQoYLAdQaHHTBroW5Aim41VAwg0G7DX+KHKmRQkfCHgHUXFnBQ0uV KguGMDlh5mWPWwqqpPCz81jQoUWPJl3a9GnUqVWP7GhwwgfJDQNckP9IQACG2AXrYrDrwSAcuHY1 mFFcMDDb4ow/JxYp+QiGChcja1wpQITZwtkTq0SOfPV38OHFjydf3nxB7AXhaAARgCWAN4PgHC5Y 4QLwlgJDIBcxET3MgjCAaQLfGtKpNcI4w4i57AT4yS7GJAtMIcy4++k22Qqi7zwOO/TwQxBDNG2C CYSD6YMMStSAoAtKpODFEARwES0P4HoLBIMcM+iIvmoUoIISBdNtM43YYlClGk3S4IgQBnGQOvfc osCnJp88KAMBBHjvMyFF9PJLMMMU0zwP7CKusA8uKBCA/kCA44IQDlLTIMowOAKonwz6Kc0AQrjT zc3Uw9EMsfLECA7/HNu64E6X3Ey0LQIU6ggERwsC4QIM8gPUpfzG9PRTUEMVlancRjX1VFRTVXVV okBgiFVYY5V1VlprtfVWXHPVdVdee/X1V2CDFXZYYos19lhkk1V2WWabdfZZaKOVdlpqAZgzKsry XIoyu8xE6gIRiMo2NTgwOEuATkcTAUgBHq32XXjpysupD+qidxB8812TqEGoE6pe/06jYBDLBslA s9EsGESDgQdpLSmz3I13YmD7xTPRED5AFKMP3KUUYPU+OHMkELb4IE6gArDXJYuNahmAjFEG+AiN N3PzZDy1HSnPlEgOCgQnA/wIjpMz7pRod0MIIOkPENZzEJ7MWNig/55tJjrOEBTO1FJDS5aYYrBZ fXmjvwSSb+DogoZjAnzZnkiEfCdoieAM8I30af+ABrColtMe5MR+8c0gToI1wNc3EOo2GMfEBccR bXxfHYngfeuloO4McIQbXw3i3LzvfAMGQOFHe15bcN8KP/yCfAM43eDUSZw3bNpRHRsDhz1KiG0B ahQJdws+cDuk14D3aBAPcPd38nwNRplvGv8OQGERVNbAA4UnwlcE5c1OHuqeMvCAgAz6Grj3uoNi G98Kwq1X/O41EJ/1RQn+gHrgaxrkUbaHig4DAsjveNzr1xG0Bof/BfAv7NtX7Rw4KoIBpUoeGES4 BqYhkQysJRTE1P8g7jaBBaplbJa7y9iGYjENAsAiFQAZyFpmMQEQzDosY0gMQXDBjSRGPetSXFyC lsOR8CY6dvGgCj9whIGVMGA4DMrC7DIwy+mmJLlz4gWgGMEHZtFUJiSRllqCw/7hUGUd9IxIXrg8 kGFwKDhEIXM6Yy8XUqdlIsBLv9LIOpIQhokwc11BVPZG/1wQhFnazUWAkkTexMUgMcyTBTRSRUw1 SY5TXJBE7IIBSWpRk6EiWABg4zrcaYAnOLxgDB8yRKAlJJUemSSe/vaBAIigfGwSXXSWBj7cPSSX Y1yMvbAYwfK1pH/BXM9fSKlDuFlgg69c2BaA9pqgxfACBPibQir/GEPflIlnBLuT8UBIHN5k0iNo YR0GtvBNhcAJi5tkZ5iah6+T2W0tehRJCBTnttHlK3Os1E1eVNa8fe7xn4cDwDnjRjQ4+rKVrMsX QT5XQSA2RIcSzVfn6mW4w23hnkFbH8Hg8DqCOY1NzZObSxRXzTMeBJ6NwxdMTNhOmH4Ilp+s2QT6 UhAztKZqlHnMEWOCKUZ1zI8jM6InYUk1nV3qAiODQ38eY8Q7Ee1OS/NjoszQG6p5CwA55dq/egOZ umhzMmpCGnrIahCnpmsyvLmbethqs6pyTQ4qfOtIiBpTvIoIBPicVhrz+leK3VCZ1LphuAB7WMQm VrGLZWxjHXvY/xBUTmeq6U+37MKoqmQMNrB8Q0qM+jChTmameTLaY01rLOEBZUJPaRdUKqsBC1x2 LGZ50cBcVVsQqpBEojQOw15UEAswLAOGPW1xf8UYwAQstJyyVH5Ku9etXU1PjTrKhoyIMhCgLASJ Skm6lisUk6gvUgIIpAW1lTjNJM646+1VbgITAg2QiALCbM1naHM5D2hpAiCo0ZQY8rdBGoVLiZsS TDygFgI1JAP4hRnD4jsU+KZrXWtJFB03AhuUmUEDLVEvez2Mq3q9cyI30dCB1oIYyBCELfsEDmJA MtGgcIk9KsxApOxzAVUCiAAlOcldR0fcgnRuSH58pHABVIEFD//XSyFQ64ed3BT3ag9hyvFMR85y gUQdJrXG0R5dBMwxS1pxIuvZ8FhlNJMMWEAETbZnUCw85MK8qSVrEwF8q0ebJ+c5VsjlcnGywyUu 5ZdhgolNYBhUFLZ8wJK86Qh8hYwi66QnBNAxJFAwBJT9GuQ9B9kbl8O7lsnqWdShivKFC4IhCvgG OB3bWwY1tukJEOfQRKEPcBDWu4ZwryT+MRcAHNRnoCxJgjetj2HV/BKDUIAAAjKIkEf9bFGV2kde tJZEpoQRy1iRIMF1lUQqIEcvN2SNF5pRuajjkCg50idJEoCw6VQ2tPLEUisC0lpmpNvY7gTa+wYV ooByBEZdamv/Zt2uZsp1LaJt8Fojma5AhrKptqyZuSrE0Wx8g4GOpGlRQfG3BJ83VnMapExraiq4 +H1yaIkO5Stnectd/nKYx/yBH1gIUFz1s1BP5nnS1dPDgjLaj7sLDh9nssyN7isBUOA2/zj1BDDA dNfgRChr848sLweTtcU3A5g1yD9qS1yZWDpg86nZ0c2OK6grhCBQr7kA/vEPyQHlLf7Z5xbYkx4L SJ1IP5uA19GjgX/4R0v/gM3ZDZ8rDP0DR043SM2FcuAJsTgDZij86PR+kApUTU/LW+1GPHl40NPq A1Dv+9vzdOlhKxU9XoctWm2q1gukCISPKnWyA+Dz0Of+VCTJ/7Rk9tr4uG8kXBMqUSwHN5kA1Luy Rxjf3zevWtF1Bve6p/6nQED4RUo97ajfjNentKIt+xrLCIMD08u0caCknc/Win7lq/9+T2WaamqJ TZY4/kkLoMQM8FZz+yZD7FPbk7moPQ1xP/g7wC95OwUkiKf7h9dovMuDPuDaC7wgGiyJPSC7kiwR n+dLrkMyQAQMQRDRLO3CsOcJgY8LCj8ROUxxLrv4Gpixi4/ruIIAOJsjGhHMQV5pMh3sQR/8QSAM QiFklncqQiM8QiRMQiVcQiZsQid8QiiMQimcQiqsQiu8QizMQi3cQi7sQi98Qt34QjEcQzIsQzM8 QzRMQzVcQx82bEMjDEM3jEM5nEM6rEM7vEM8zMN3GkI+fBaAABAQADs= ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C0FC1F.0C867CE0-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Jun 23 20:52:06 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id UAA25414; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 20:51:40 -0700 Resent-Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 20:51:40 -0700 X-Apparently-From: Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.20010623223006.0095b7c0 postoffice.swbell.net> X-Sender: cjford1 pop.mail.yahoo.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58 Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 22:55:13 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Charles Ford Subject: Re: Getting Closer to Grand Unified? In-Reply-To: <01e501c0fbc4$85ac5780$b28f85ce computer> References: <4.2.0.58.20010622223919.0095d8d0 postoffice.swbell.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <"TxOkE1.0.uC6.BFMDx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43334 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 04:10 AM 6/23/01 -0500, Frederick Sparber wrote: >What I was getting at, is that the gravity force seems to be an Intrinsically >Attractive Force that comes about by way of the relativistic mechanisms of the >sub-atomic particles. This meaning the media "eather" is distorted by the speed of the particles and the mechanism of the distortion is electromagnetic. This is how I understood this. The neutron disintegration helps. (some of that learning) >Most of the stuff I've used to put together the String-Circle (or Wave-Circle) >"Model". was gotten from older >EE texts. :-) I find these old dusty books of mine to be quite revealing. Seems the more you understand... the more you can understand. Information doesn't clog the human mind but rather tends to open it. > > I teach myself physics as time > > permits. >That's the best way, otherwise you could become an aesthetic or a philosopher. Oops just went there for a moment :-) > > IF this is true I think you could attenuate G with a simple > > bowel shaped superconductor like a hunk of chain link fence will attenuate > > a cell phone signal. This could be experimental proof. > >Gravity shielding with chicken wire, Charles? Hmmm :-) Sort of... Like microscopic chicken wire... You are talking about very short wavelengths. Shorter then the distances of typical molecular bonds. I believe this is why mass appears to be transparent to G Robin mentioned the bowel shape. There is more to the bowel shape. In order to test this conjecture you might form a bowel shaped superconductor to hide the entire mass of the Earth from a test object. Using a sensitive scale place the test object inside the bowel and begin to chill it. When the bowel material reaches the necessary temperature the test object my loose weight. Shadowing the entire Earth mass allows you to directly calculate the attenuation as a percentage of G without tons of advanced math. That is if the experiment works. Charlie Ford KC5-OWZ cjford1 yahoo.com cjford1 swbell.net _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Jun 23 21:37:33 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id VAA02546; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 21:35:34 -0700 Resent-Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 21:35:34 -0700 Message-ID: <027201c0fc5e$a6bb6c00$b28f85ce computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: Cc: References: <4.2.0.58.20010622223919.0095d8d0 postoffice.swbell.net> <4.2.0.58.20010623223006.0095b7c0@postoffice.swbell.net> Subject: Re: Getting Closer to Grand Unified? Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 22:34:56 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Resent-Message-ID: <"b7HEe1.0.id.MuMDx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43335 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: ----- Original Message ----- From: "Charles Ford" To: Sent: Saturday, June 23, 2001 10:55 PM Subject: Re: Getting Closer to Grand Unified? Hi Charles: Would you please change "Bowel Shape" to Bowl Shape before I bust a gut laughing. :-) Best, Frederick > At 04:10 AM 6/23/01 -0500, Frederick Sparber wrote: > > >What I was getting at, is that the gravity force seems to be an Intrinsically > >Attractive Force that comes about by way of the relativistic mechanisms of the > >sub-atomic particles. > > This meaning the media "eather" is distorted by the speed of the particles > and the mechanism of the distortion is electromagnetic. This is how I > understood this. > > The neutron disintegration helps. (some of that learning) > > >Most of the stuff I've used to put together the String-Circle (or Wave-Circle) > >"Model". was gotten from older > >EE texts. :-) > > I find these old dusty books of mine to be quite revealing. Seems the more > you understand... the more you can understand. Information doesn't clog > the human mind but rather tends to open it. > > > > I teach myself physics as time > > > permits. > >That's the best way, otherwise you could become an aesthetic or a philosopher. > > Oops just went there for a moment :-) > > > > > > IF this is true I think you could attenuate G with a simple > > > bowel shaped superconductor like a hunk of chain link fence will attenuate > > > a cell phone signal. This could be experimental proof. > > > >Gravity shielding with chicken wire, Charles? Hmmm :-) > > Sort of... Like microscopic chicken wire... You are talking about very > short wavelengths. Shorter then the distances of typical molecular > bonds. I believe this is why mass appears to be transparent to G > > Robin mentioned the bowel shape. > > There is more to the bowel shape. In order to test this conjecture you > might form a bowel shaped superconductor to hide the entire mass of the > Earth from a test object. Using a sensitive scale place the test object > inside the bowel and begin to chill it. When the bowel material reaches > the necessary temperature the test object my loose weight. Shadowing the > entire Earth mass allows you to directly calculate the attenuation as a > percentage of G without tons of advanced math. > > That is if the experiment works. > Charlie Ford > KC5-OWZ > cjford1 yahoo.com > cjford1 swbell.net > > _________________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get your free yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Jun 23 22:13:52 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id WAA10090; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 22:13:09 -0700 Resent-Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 22:13:09 -0700 X-Apparently-From: Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.20010624001121.0095f230 postoffice.swbell.net> X-Sender: cjford1 pop.mail.yahoo.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58 Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 00:16:34 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Charles Ford Subject: Re: Getting Closer to Grand Unified? In-Reply-To: <027201c0fc5e$a6bb6c00$b28f85ce computer> References: <4.2.0.58.20010622223919.0095d8d0 postoffice.swbell.net> <4.2.0.58.20010623223006.0095b7c0 postoffice.swbell.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <"OqDaf.0.aT2.aRNDx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43336 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 10:34 PM 6/23/01 -0500, you wrote: >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Charles Ford" >To: >Sent: Saturday, June 23, 2001 10:55 PM >Subject: Re: Getting Closer to Grand Unified? > >Hi Charles: > >Would you please change "Bowel Shape" to Bowl Shape >before I bust a gut laughing. :-) > >Best, Frederick Sorry ... didn't notice and of course through the spell check unnoticed. It is rather hilarious though. Tehe he snort > > > > Robin mentioned the SENSORED shape. > > > > There is more to the SENSORED shape. In order to test this conjecture > you > > might form a SENSORED shaped superconductor to hide the entire mass of the > > Earth from a test object. Using a sensitive scale place the test object > > inside the SENSORED and begin to chill it. When the SENSORED material > reaches > > the necessary temperature the test object my loose weight. Shadowing the > > entire Earth mass allows you to directly calculate the attenuation as a > > percentage of G without tons of advanced math. > > > > That is if the experiment works. Charlie Ford KC5-OWZ cjford1 yahoo.com cjford1 swbell.net _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Jun 23 22:16:30 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id WAA10777; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 22:15:44 -0700 Resent-Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 22:15:44 -0700 From: Robin van Spaandonk To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Getting Closer to Grand Unified? Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 15:15:09 +1000 Organization: Improving Message-ID: References: <4.2.0.58.20010622223919.0095d8d0 postoffice.swbell.net> <01e501c0fbc4$85ac5780$b28f85ce@computer> <4.2.0.58.20010623223006.0095b7c0@postoffice.swbell.net> In-Reply-To: <4.2.0.58.20010623223006.0095b7c0 postoffice.swbell.net> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id WAA10753 Resent-Message-ID: <"hcSgk3.0.Je2.0UNDx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43337 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: In reply to Charles Ford's message of Sat, 23 Jun 2001 22:55:13 -0500: [snip] >Robin mentioned the bowel shape. No, you originally did, everyone else quoted it. See http://www.escribe.com/science/vortex/m19760.html . [snip] Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Jun 23 22:43:19 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id WAA17654; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 22:42:31 -0700 Resent-Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 22:42:31 -0700 Message-ID: <028201c0fc68$02d6be00$b28f85ce computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: Cc: References: <4.2.0.58.20010622223919.0095d8d0 postoffice.swbell.net> <4.2.0.58.20010623223006.0095b7c0@postoffice.swbell.net> Subject: Re: Getting Closer to Grand Unified? Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 23:40:41 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Resent-Message-ID: <"6oX_k3.0.hJ4.7tNDx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43338 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: ----- Original Message ----- From: "Charles Ford" To: Sent: Saturday, June 23, 2001 10:55 PM Subject: Re: Getting Closer to Grand Unified? Charles Ford wrote: Reply with the B word changed. :-) > At 04:10 AM 6/23/01 -0500, Frederick Sparber wrote: > > >What I was getting at, is that the gravity force seems to be an Intrinsically > >Attractive Force that comes about by way of the relativistic mechanisms of the > >sub-atomic particles. > > This meaning the media "aether" is distorted by the speed of the particles > and the mechanism of the distortion is electromagnetic. Sort of. The Wave-Circle (String-Circle) can be thought of as a Photon (Energy Wave) that has came to rest and divided (at allowed resonant energies) into two standing inertial waves localized in space (String-Circles or Quarks) that make up the atoms. There are 5A - 2Z of these in each atom or nucleon: 2A "up" or Positive String-Circles 2A - Z "down" or Negative String-Circles A-Z anti-neutrinos plus the Z negative external electrons. In Antimatter, still 5A - 2Z but the signs are reversed and neutrinos instead of anti-neutrinos, with the external "electrons" being Positrons. For instance the Proton (1H1) with A = 1 and Z = 1: 5A - 2Z = 5*1 - 2*1 = 3 String-Circles or Quarks: OTOH the neutron (oN1) with A = 1 and Z = 0: 5A - 2Z = 5*1 - 0 = 5 String-Circles or Quarks: 2A = 2 "up" 2A - Z = 2 " down" A - Z = 1 anti-neutrino and 0 external electrons. The gravity field from these add up to the gravitational field of the atom, and by the time you get to the 5.98E24 kg mass of the Earth, it adds up to a bunch. > This is how I > understood this. This is just one model out of many, but it's close to String-Superstring Theory. So Far. :-) > > The neutron disintegration helps. (some of that learning) > > >Most of the stuff I've used to put together the String-Circle (or Wave-Circle) > >"Model". was gotten from older > >EE texts. :-) > > I find these old dusty books of mine to be quite revealing. Seems the more > you understand... the more you can understand. Information doesn't clog > the human mind but rather tends to open it. Especially in older texts where they were not swamped with a technology explosion. > > > > I teach myself physics as time > > > permits. > >That's the best way, otherwise you could become an aesthetic or a philosopher. > > Oops just went there for a moment :-) > > > > > > IF this is true I think you could attenuate G with a simple > > > bowl shaped superconductor like a hunk of chain link fence will attenuate > > > a cell phone signal. This could be experimental proof. > > > >Gravity shielding with chicken wire, Charles? Hmmm :-) > > Sort of... Like microscopic chicken wire... You are talking about very > short wavelengths. Shorter then the distances of typical molecular > bonds. I believe this is why mass appears to be transparent to G I disagree. Mass appears transparent to G because at the right frequency and wave configuration the material surrounding such a configuration "aligns" to it, thus making it transparent. IOW the relativistic time dilation of the particles allows them to "see each other" because they are in the same reference frame. > > Robin mentioned the bowl shape. > > There is more to the bowl shape. In order to test this conjecture you > might form a bowl shaped superconductor to hide the entire mass of the > Earth from a test object. Using a sensitive scale place the test object > inside the bowl and begin to chill it. When the bowl material reaches > the necessary temperature the test object my loose weight. Shadowing the > entire Earth mass allows you to directly calculate the attenuation as a > percentage of G without tons of advanced math. Tons of advanced math is a waste of time. It's a matter of visualization. > > That is if the experiment works. Worth a try if you have the equipment. Regards, Frederick > Charlie Ford > KC5-OWZ > cjford1 yahoo.com > cjford1 swbell.net > > _________________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get your free yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Jun 24 08:19:23 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id IAA13166; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 08:18:35 -0700 Resent-Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 08:18:35 -0700 Message-ID: <000201c0fcb8$7a237520$8eb4bfa8 computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: Cc: Subject: Re: Getting Closer to Grand Unified? Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 09:17:14 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0001_01C0FC8E.7515EA60" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Resent-Message-ID: <"G1_EY2.0.eD3.BJWDx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43339 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C0FC8E.7515EA60 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Untitled DocumentRead Mr. Thompkin's Visit to the Land of Relativity, by George Gamow. Doubleday. There the speed of light, c is ten miles/hour. Great book. Lecture 8 - General Relativity Statement of Special Relativity All bodies in reference frames K and K', which are moving with uniform = linear motion relative to one another, are equivalent for the = description of all natural phenomena in a Euclidian geometry. Problems of Special Relativity It only holds for inertial reference frames. That is reference frames = that are moving a constant velocity with respect to each other with no = rotation. For example, Newton's First Law states that all objects will = remain at rest or travel along straight lines unless acted upon by some = external force. But, this only applies for reference frames in linear = motion. If a reference frame is accelerated, this doesn't work. It says that nothing can move faster than the speed of light. This = arguably goes against Newton's Third Law (gravitation). If one moves a = mass from one place to another, Newton's law says that its influence on = all other matter is instantaneous. This doesn't fit notion of light = being fastest and finite. Statement of General Relativity All bodies in refernce frames K and K' are equivalent for the = description of all natural phenomena no matter what their state of = motion in a Gaussian (or Riemannian, non-Euclidian) geometry. This theory will not work for Euclidean geometry. It does work for more = general curvilinear coordinate systems called Gaussian or Riemannian = geometries. These geometries can describe the universe and happen to be = curved depending on wher mass in located. In this statement, the effects we associate with gravity can be seen to = be equivalent with the effects of uniform acceleration of our reference = frame. Mr. Thompkin's first visit to the Land of Relativity (I - City Speed Limit) Most of the activities which Mr. Thompkins (MT) sees during his first = trip to the land of relativity can be explained by the Special Theory of = Relativity. One sequence, however, must be explained by the General = Theory of Relativity. * At the train station MT sees a young man coming off the train meeting = an old lady. It turns out the young man is the grandfather of the old = lady. Man spends a lot of time travelling where time moves more slowly. = Therefore he ages more slowly than people who live in town and do not = travel much. [This can be explained by the Special Theory of Relativity, = travel at relativistic speeds causes time to slow down. But, it can also = be explained in terms of the General Theory of Relativity - see below.] * Train engineer claims he is responsible for making people age more = slowly on trains because he is brakeman. Suggests time slows down due to = acceleration and decceleration. [ The Genral Theory of Relativity states = that time slows down whenever acceleration (or decceleration) is = occurring. So young man nay be young due to effects of either Special or = General Theory of Relativity. Twin Paradox The General Theory of Relativity also provides a more realistic = explanation of the Twin Paradox. When we first visited the Twin Paradox, = we stated that the space ship went away from the Earth at constant = linear relativisitic speed, then turned around and came back. We = attributed difference in age of twins to time spent at constant = relativiistic speed (slower time). But, realistically, the space ship = had to accelerate and deccelerate twice to really make the trip. Age = difference could also be due to this. Perspectives on General Relativity Example 1:=20 The reasoning which led to the General Theory of Relativity (GTR) = included simple examples of how things behave in systems under = acceleration. For example, consider a space ship at rest (of in constant = liear motion) somewhere far from sources of gravitation. Inside the = spaceship a man (or any object) will float in the air and a beam of = light shone from one location will travel in a straight line. If the = ship starts to accelerate, the person or any object will move in = adirection opposite the direction of acceleration until there is contact = witht he ship. Then theperson/object will move with the ship but feel = the force of acceleration. A person would interpret this as gravity! = This establishes the equivalence of acceleration andgravity in GTR. Under acceleration, light shone from one location in the ship will no = longer travel in a straight line, but rather a curved arc (unless light = direction is exactly parallel to direction of acceleration). This = suggests light rays can be bent by sources of gravity. This effect is = visible as light from distant stars goe close to, but past, the Sun. Example 2: Another example (Mr. Thompkins, Chapter 4), is to imagine a = merry-go-round which is walled off so that anyone on the merry-go-round = can't see that they are rotating. Let the merry-go-round spin at a speed = near the speed of light. (Remember, rotation even at constant velocity = is a form of acceleration because the direction is always changing.) In = this example, people of the merry-go-round will 'feel' a gravitation = that is outward toward the edges ofthe merry-go-round. Speed in the = merry-go-round will change from zero at the center to almost the speed = of light at the edges. Let a meter stick be used to measure the merry-go-round by laying the = stick end-to-end from the center to the edge and then end-to-end around = the circumference of the merry-go-round. In Euclidean space (inertial = reference frames), the ratio of the radius to circumference is 2*pi, = where pi is 3.14159... But, in the case of the merry-go-round, the ratio = will be bigger. The reason is that the meter stick is always the same = length as one progresses towar dthe edge ofthe merry-go-round because = lengths only change in direction of motion (Lorentz transformations). = But, masurement along the edge will align the meter stick with the = direction of motion and it will change its length. Also, if one tried to stretch a piece of string or rope from one place = on the merry-go-round edge to another place, the string would prefer to = 'bend' toard the middle. This is because the shortest distance between = two points in an accelerated reference frame is no longer a straight = line. Euclidean geometry doesn't hold! What we have is a curvilinear = non-Euclidean (Riemanian ) geomtry. This is the geometry of our = Universe! Last but not least, a clock placed at the center of the merry-go-round = will be faster than a clock at the edge due to efects of acceleration. Key Experimental Tests of the General Theory of Relativity 1) Light travelling from distant stars ar bent around the Sun as the = light rays go closely past it. 2) Precession of all planetary orbits around the Sun. This precession is = most easily measured for Mercury. Implications The Universe is curvilinear in form and is a true space-time continuum.=20 The curvilinear nature can be attributed to location and size of masses = in the Universe. Planets can be viewed as moving along paths that are the shortest = distance along a curved surface near a strong source of mass (gravity), = the Sun. Return to Index=20 ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C0FC8E.7515EA60 Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Untitled Document
Read Mr. Thompkin's Visit to the Land = of=20 Relativity, by
George Gamow.  Doubleday.  = There =20 the speed of light, c is
ten miles/hour. Great = book.

Lecture 8 - General=20 Relativity

 

Statement of Special=20 Relativity

All bodies in reference frames K and K', which are moving with = uniform linear=20 motion relative to one another, are equivalent for the description of = all=20 natural phenomena in a Euclidian geometry.

 

Problems of Special=20 Relativity

It only holds for inertial reference frames. That is reference frames = that=20 are moving a constant velocity with respect to each other with no = rotation. For=20 example, Newton's First Law states that all objects will remain at rest = or=20 travel along straight lines unless acted upon by some external force. = But, this=20 only applies for reference frames in linear motion. If a reference frame = is=20 accelerated, this doesn't work.

It says that nothing can move faster than the speed of light. This = arguably=20 goes against Newton's Third Law (gravitation). If one moves a mass from = one=20 place to another, Newton's law says that its influence on all other = matter is=20 instantaneous. This doesn't fit notion of light being fastest and = finite.

 

Statement of General=20 Relativity

All bodies in refernce frames K and K' are equivalent for the = description of=20 all natural phenomena no matter what their state of motion in a Gaussian = (or=20 Riemannian, non-Euclidian) geometry.

This theory will not work for Euclidean geometry. It does work for = more=20 general curvilinear coordinate systems called Gaussian or Riemannian = geometries.=20 These geometries can describe the universe and happen to be curved = depending on=20 wher mass in located.

In this statement, the effects we associate with gravity can be seen = to be=20 equivalent with the effects of uniform acceleration of our reference = frame.

 

Mr. Thompkin's first visit to the Land of Relativity

(I - City Speed=20 Limit)

Most of the activities which Mr. Thompkins (MT) sees during his first = trip to=20 the land of relativity can be explained by the Special Theory of = Relativity. One=20 sequence, however, must be explained by the General Theory of = Relativity.

* At the train station MT sees a young man coming off the train = meeting an=20 old lady. It turns out the young man is the grandfather of the old lady. = Man=20 spends a lot of time travelling where time moves more slowly. Therefore = he ages=20 more slowly than people who live in town and do not travel much. [This = can be=20 explained by the Special Theory of Relativity, travel at relativistic = speeds=20 causes time to slow down. But, it can also be explained in terms of the = General=20 Theory of Relativity - see below.]

* Train engineer claims he is responsible for making people age more = slowly=20 on trains because he is brakeman. Suggests time slows down due to = acceleration=20 and decceleration. [ The Genral Theory of Relativity states that time = slows down=20 whenever acceleration (or decceleration) is occurring. So young man nay = be young=20 due to effects of either Special or General Theory of Relativity.

 

Twin=20 Paradox

The General Theory of Relativity also provides a more realistic = explanation=20 of the Twin Paradox. When we first visited the Twin Paradox, we stated = that the=20 space ship went away from the Earth at constant linear relativisitic = speed, then=20 turned around and came back. We attributed difference in age of twins to = time=20 spent at constant relativiistic speed (slower time). But, realistically, = the=20 space ship had to accelerate and deccelerate twice to really make the = trip. Age=20 difference could also be due to this.

 

Perspectives on General=20 Relativity

Example 1:

The reasoning which led to the General Theory of Relativity (GTR) = included=20 simple examples of how things behave in systems under acceleration. For = example,=20 consider a space ship at rest (of in constant liear motion) somewhere = far from=20 sources of gravitation. Inside the spaceship a man (or any object) will = float in=20 the air and a beam of light shone from one location will travel in a = straight=20 line. If the ship starts to accelerate, the person or any object will = move in=20 adirection opposite the direction of acceleration until there is contact = witht=20 he ship. Then theperson/object will move with the ship but feel the = force of=20 acceleration. A person would interpret this as gravity! This establishes = the=20 equivalence of acceleration andgravity in GTR.

Under acceleration, light shone from one location in the ship will no = longer=20 travel in a straight line, but rather a curved arc (unless light = direction is=20 exactly parallel to direction of acceleration). This suggests light rays = can be=20 bent by sources of gravity. This effect is visible as light from distant = stars=20 goe close to, but past, the Sun.

 

Example 2:

Another example (Mr. Thompkins, Chapter 4), is to imagine a = merry-go-round=20 which is walled off so that anyone on the merry-go-round can't see that = they are=20 rotating. Let the merry-go-round spin at a speed near the speed of = light.=20 (Remember, rotation even at constant velocity is a form of acceleration = because=20 the direction is always changing.) In this example, people of the = merry-go-round=20 will 'feel' a gravitation that is outward toward the edges ofthe = merry-go-round.=20 Speed in the merry-go-round will change from zero at the center to = almost the=20 speed of light at the edges.

Let a meter stick be used to measure the merry-go-round by laying the = stick=20 end-to-end from the center to the edge and then end-to-end around the=20 circumference of the merry-go-round. In Euclidean space (inertial = reference=20 frames), the ratio of the radius to circumference is 2*pi, where pi is=20 3.14159... But, in the case of the merry-go-round, the ratio will be = bigger. The=20 reason is that the meter stick is always the same length as one = progresses towar=20 dthe edge ofthe merry-go-round because lengths only change in direction = of=20 motion (Lorentz transformations). But, masurement along the edge will = align the=20 meter stick with the direction of motion and it will change its = length.

Also, if one tried to stretch a piece of string or rope from one = place on the=20 merry-go-round edge to another place, the string would prefer to 'bend' = toard=20 the middle. This is because the shortest distance between two points in = an=20 accelerated reference frame is no longer a straight line. Euclidean = geometry=20 doesn't hold! What we have is a curvilinear non-Euclidean (Riemanian ) = geomtry.=20 This is the geometry of our Universe!

Last but not least, a clock placed at the center of the = merry-go-round will=20 be faster than a clock at the edge due to efects of acceleration.

 

Key Experimental Tests of the General Theory of=20 Relativity

1) Light travelling from distant stars ar bent around the Sun as the = light=20 rays go closely past it.

2) Precession of all planetary orbits around the Sun. This precession = is most=20 easily measured for Mercury.

 

=

Implications

The Universe is curvilinear in form and is a true space-time = continuum.

The curvilinear nature can be attributed to location and size of = masses in=20 the Universe.

Planets can be viewed as moving along paths that are the shortest = distance=20 along a curved surface near a strong source of mass (gravity), the = Sun.

Return to Index

------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C0FC8E.7515EA60-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Jun 24 08:33:49 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id IAA17279; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 08:33:19 -0700 Resent-Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 08:33:19 -0700 Message-ID: <000301c0fcba$8b275060$8eb4bfa8 computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: Cc: Subject: Re:Getting Closer to Grand Unified? Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 09:32:21 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0009_01C0FC90.91F33820" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Resent-Message-ID: <"HeQNJ.0.vD4._WWDx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43340 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0009_01C0FC90.91F33820 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mr. Thompkin's adventures etc. http://spot.colorado.edu/~gamow/george/booklist.html ------=_NextPart_000_0009_01C0FC90.91F33820 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="Books by George Gamow.url" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="Books by George Gamow.url" [DEFAULT] BASEURL=http://spot.colorado.edu/~gamow/george/booklist.html [InternetShortcut] URL=http://spot.colorado.edu/~gamow/george/booklist.html Modified=20A19200BAFCC001CA ------=_NextPart_000_0009_01C0FC90.91F33820-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Jun 24 10:16:15 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id KAA10526; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 10:15:30 -0700 Resent-Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 10:15:30 -0700 Message-ID: <002b01c0fcc8$d08045a0$8eb4bfa8 computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: Cc: Subject: Re; Getting Closer to Grand Unified? Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 11:13:19 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Resent-Message-ID: <"SejHj.0.Oa2.n0YDx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43341 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Charles, this is how I perceive gravitation using the Wave-Circle or String-Circle Model. Imagine two carousels equipped with kids on "ponies" or such, that move up and down as the carousels turn, with large clocks mounted on the rims so that the kids can observe the clocks and each other on the neighboring carousel. With the carousels turning near the local speed of light c at 10 mph, the acceleration (v^2/r) is constant due to the constant change of direction of a point on the rotating carousel. Thus since the slowing (time dilation) depends on how close the carousel rim velocity is to the 10 mph light speed, say 9.99999 mph: T = 1/[1 - (9.99999^2/10^2)]^1/2 = 1,000,000 times as slow as say one second on the clocks. IOW, for all practical purposes Time Stands Still for the kids and clocks on the carousels, one second becomes one million seconds (11.574 days) but for mom and dad observing this, all they see is a blur. With a time dilation of ~ 3.35E18 due to the 1.03E25 Hz "internal manifestations" of the String-Circles, you can see why a Displacement Current (I = q*f) that is dilated from ~1.65E6 amperes to ~ 5.0E-13 amperes results in the weak gravitational field. Like the kids and clocks the particles can "see" each other, but it's a bit difficult for us "moms and dads" to figure out a way to couple into it (the magneto-gravity fields) with our antigravity/gravity-screening schemes. :-) Regards, Frederick From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Jun 24 12:00:45 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id MAA21988; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 12:00:15 -0700 Resent-Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 12:00:15 -0700 Message-Id: <3.0.6.32.20010624150007.007a5dd0 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.6 (32) Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 15:00:07 -0400 To: vortex-l eskimo.com, vortex-l@eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: Re: Enron market value falls by half In-Reply-To: References: <5.0.2.1.2.20010622112850.00a953d0 pop.mindspring.com> <5.0.2.1.2.20010622112850.00a953d0 pop.mindspring.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Resent-Message-ID: <"h2XZA.0.PN5.-YZDx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43342 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Robin van Spaandonk wrote: >A large part of the drop in consumption is probably due to the rolling >blackouts, rather than due to any drop in demand. As Dan Quickert pointed out, the blackouts have been very short and they only involve a small fraction of the total users, in limited areas. If the electricity in California was off 11% of the time, or even 5% of the time (1 hour, 10 minutes per day everywhere in the state), you would hear about it. It would be front page news everywhere. Most of the 11% reduction probably comes at times other than peak hours, such as night, when it does not do a bit of good. Okay, it saves fuel and reduces pollution, but the only shortages occur between noon and 6:00 p.m. In February and March there were shortages on days when consumption was significantly below 2000 and 1999. Many people suspect the power companies are manipulating production. The S.F. Chronicle reports that recently laid off power company workers say they were ordered to take plants off line for unnessary maintenance, and to destroy spare parts so that maintenance would take days longer than it should. - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Jun 21 10:56:31 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id KAA10079 for billb eskimo.com; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 10:56:30 -0700 Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 10:56:30 -0700 X-Envelope-From: herman college.antioch-college.edu Thu Jun 21 10:56:28 2001 Received: from college.antioch-college.edu (antioch-college.edu [192.131.123.11]) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA10049 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 10:56:28 -0700 Received: from localhost (herman localhost) by college.antioch-college.edu (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f5LI2wL11502; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 14:02:58 -0400 (EDT) Old-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 14:02:58 -0400 (EDT) From: John Schnurer To: Bruce Meland cc: vortex-l eskimo.com, Jed Rothwell , jcarey9622 aol.com Subject: Re: Other Hyrogen fuel In-Reply-To: <000101c0f8e4$ce955920$e2181ad8 oemcomputer> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Diagnostic: Not on the accept list X-Envelope-To: vortex-l Status: RO X-Status: On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Bruce Meland wrote: > Yes I agree with you mostly of what you stated below, and I appologize for > a rather curse statement. I just wanted to get a point across. It is a > tendency for peer reviewers to jump to conclusions perhaps because they > have not been given all the facts about the invention or are not wiling to > gather all the information and facts like Park. I am guilty of not giving > all the facts about the neutrino voltaics technology because the 2 inventors > who have the technology are not about to reveal all the details due to > patent or confidentiality reasons to potential investors. And Jack has not > given you all the facts about their technology. Like some cold fusion > patent applications the neutrinovoltaics patent applications have been > denied and supression tactics used. But hopefully future PO procedures and > supression tactics will subside for the bettermant health of the people and > planet earth. What do you mean the capacitor "operates" at 50 Thz? T in Thz stands for Tera ... or 10 to positive 12th power. Capacitors pass AC... or alternating current.... Jack > Shulman, CEO of American Computer Co., ACC, who developed the transfer > capacitor, TCAP, which operates at 12-THz , ran a 4-function breadboard > programable 50 Thz calculator.(50 trillion hertz) and What allows storage? allows storage > densities of 90 gigabytes. I have capacitor technology that can store 25 times this much... and you can go to the computer store and do the same... ACC decided not to get a patent because it would > reveal too much to competitors. Lockeed and ATT are in pursuit and > perhaps have done some backengineering on some of their TCAP's installed in > a few notebook computers. And it is suspected Lockeed has incorporated > perhaps a version of the TCAP in their TransAtmospheric Warfighter. ATT > with all its power essentially shut down ACC's business for a while and it's > many Web Sites due to the bankruptcy of North Point Communications(ACC's > provider) along with 600,000 Northpoint DSL subscribers. ATT now claims the > TCAP as it's own. Bruce.... this is BS... can YOU show me a story wherein ATT claims they have a ?Transfer Capacitor" ??? And... what ...exactly IS a Transfer Capacitor??? What or how does it 'transfer' ??? > on line at www.AmericanMafia.com about their power. ACC is barely holding > its own because it has not revealed all it's trade secrets and in spite of > super advanced covert and overt attacks by big commercial rivals and > government interference. More details can be obtained from > CompAmericaOnline.com Web sites: www.aliensci.com and > www.roswellinternet.com and of course get the Jul-Aug, 2001 issue No. 28 > of Atlantis Rising for the complete story and check out > www.antlantisrising.com Bruce ----Original Message----- > From: Jed Rothwell > To: vortex-l eskimo.com ; vortex-l@eskimo.com > ; etimes@teleport.com > Date: Monday, June 18, 2001 9:37 AM > Subject: Re: Other Hyrogen fuel > > > >I explained that I have not "debunked" anything here. I merely reported my > >exchange with Jack Carey in detail, quoting him verbatim as closely as I > >can remember. Bruce Meland responded: > > > >> Still Sounds similar to Park's tactics > > > >No, Bruce, it does not. Please stop making blanket statements without > >evidence. Here is a partial list of the differences between Robert Park and > me: > > > >1. I listed Jack Carey's e-mail address (in the message header). If he had > >not supplied his telephone number here already, I would have done so. Park > >never gives his readers a way to contact the people he critiques. > > > >2. I quoted Carey exactly and in detail, both what he wrote here, and what > >he said on the telephone. I give the reader every opportunity to see what > >the author himself claims. Park never quotes anyone directly. He > >paraphrases, deliberately distorts and ridicules the author. > > > >3. Carey has not published anything as far as I know, but if he had you can > >be sure I would list the author, title and publication. I ALWAYS provide > >footnotes. Park never does. > > > >4. I cross-check every fact, and make no assertion not backed up in the > >textbooks. Park makes up facts as he goes along, and he broadcasts ignorant > >nonsense such as the claim that you can measure magnetic field strength by > >putting sheets of paper between a magnet and a vertical metal surface. > > > >5. I read as much as I can about a subject before commenting on it, and > >that includes these claims of over-unity electrical machines. Park brags > >that he has never read a paper about cold fusion. > > > >6. Park always puts theory ahead of experiments. I put experiments first, > >but Carey says he has not performed experiments or measurements in the > >usual sense of the word. He relies upon subjective impressions such as how > >bright the lights are. > > > >In short, there is a world of difference between Park and me. If you > >continue to make this empty accusation, you will only reveal how ignorant > >you are, so I suggest you shut up. > > > >- Jed > > > > > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Jun 24 20:51:46 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id UAA32167; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 20:51:03 -0700 Resent-Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 20:51:03 -0700 X-Apparently-From: Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.20010624221408.009ee4d0 postoffice.swbell.net> X-Sender: cjford1 pop.mail.yahoo.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58 Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 22:54:39 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Charles Ford Subject: Re: Re; Getting Closer to Grand Unified? In-Reply-To: <002b01c0fcc8$d08045a0$8eb4bfa8 computer> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <"GIk2P3.0.Xs7.dKhDx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43343 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Interesting analogy... I think this could also be used to better explain things like the formation of soft-solids like pb as opposed to crystals like Si. At 11:13 AM 6/24/01 -0500, you wrote: >Charles, this is how I perceive gravitation using the Wave-Circle or >String-Circle >Model. >IOW, for all practical purposes Time Stands Still for the kids and clocks >on the carousels, one second becomes one million seconds (11.574 days) >but for mom and dad >observing this, all they see is a blur. > >With a time dilation of ~ 3.35E18 due to the 1.03E25 Hz "internal >manifestations" of >the String-Circles, you can see why a Displacement Current (I = q*f) that >is dilated >from ~1.65E6 amperes to ~ 5.0E-13 amperes results in the weak >gravitational field. > >Like the kids and clocks the particles can "see" each other, but it's a >bit difficult >for us "moms and dads" to figure out a way to couple into it (the >magneto-gravity >fields) with our antigravity/gravity-screening schemes. :-) > >Regards, Frederick A problematic part of my conjecture. A charged particle in motion causes a magnetic field. Acceleration of a charged particle causes a wave. An atom having electrons moving rapidly about in a stable "orbit" should cause a constant signal. This signal would radiate like a radio wave of a very high frequency. The wave would not be se metrical as the particle is moving very quickly. This would cause the leading slope of the wave to be steeper then the trailing. Because the movement of a charged particle is effected by a magnetic field another atom could respond to this radiated wave causing the attraction known as G. The huge number of diverse atoms that make up this planet should radiate a rather large and chaotic G radio noise with varying strengths (due to distance) and diverse spectral content (due to diverse atoms). This seemed right to me at first. The problem then was how to go about proving it. In the process of thinking it out I discovered a rather large problem in the concept. This radiated wave could be defined as a fixed amount of power. This would mean that the atom is constantly throwing out energy. This violates conservation as in "energy from ??? where ???" So if I was willing to flush conservation down the john I was ready to be considered a full fledged kook. Except I have never seen any real evidence against conservation and I am simply not willing to pull the chain yet. Not having direct access to the more recent accelerator results I simply had no way to prove this anyway. So I took conservation back out of the toilet and went back to studying. Charlie Ford KC5-OWZ cjford1 yahoo.com cjford1 swbell.net _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Jun 24 21:37:51 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id VAA15417; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 21:37:10 -0700 Resent-Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 21:37:10 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Sender: mjones pop.jump.net Message-Id: Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 23:35:09 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Mitchell Jones Subject: Re: Prospecting for Uranium Resent-Message-ID: <"tsPE62.0.im3.r_hDx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43344 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Here is an interesting Geiger counter link: http://www.gammascout.com . Do any of you guys have experience with the Gamma-Scout or have any tales to pass on from someone who has? --Mitchell Jones ________________ Quote of the month: "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value--i.e., zero." --Voltaire From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Jun 24 21:42:56 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id VAA17716; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 21:42:27 -0700 Resent-Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 21:42:27 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: <00ed01c0fb4a$7f5c9720$b28f85ce computer> Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 23:41:58 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: thomas malloy Subject: Brain cavity resonance Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Resent-Message-ID: <"eglfu1.0.YK4.p4iDx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43345 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: > > >I read somewhere that 400 MHz is also about the frequency at which our >brain cavities resonate. Maybe gravity wave communication is behind >telepathy? :) > >Regards, > >Robin van Spaandonk Have you ever heard of the Neurophone? I'm told it give the user a headache, OTOH, having a Neurophone combined with a Maser you could convince some poor schmoe that you were G-d talking to him. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Jun 24 21:42:58 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id VAA18040; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 21:42:41 -0700 Resent-Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 21:42:41 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <000201c0fcb8$7a237520$8eb4bfa8 computer> References: <000201c0fcb8$7a237520$8eb4bfa8 computer> Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 23:41:58 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: thomas malloy Subject: Re: Getting Closer to Grand Unified? Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Resent-Message-ID: <"RIB3d.0.fP4.05iDx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43347 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Re: Getting Closer to Grand Unified?

Fredrick Spaber posted;



Lecture 8 - General Relativity


Also, if one tried to stretch a piece of string or rope from one place on the merry-go-round edge to another place, the string would prefer to 'bend' toard the middle.

Wouldn't the string bend toward the outside of the Merry go round?

This is because the shortest distance between two points in an accelerated reference frame is no longer a straight line. Euclidean geometry doesn't hold! What we have is a curvilinear non-Euclidean (Riemanian ) geomtry. This is the geometry of our Universe!

I agree with that
Last but not least, a clock placed at the center of the merry-go-round will be faster than a clock at the edge due to efects of acceleration.

It would seem to me that the clock on the edge would be moving faster and therefore would go faster, Or is this assuming that the slowing of time is based on acceleration and deceleration. This is the first time I've heard time distortion attributer to aceleration and deceleration as opposed to speed.


Return to Index

I enjoyed reading this Fredrick, thank you for posting the URL.
From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Jun 24 21:43:03 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id VAA18150; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 21:42:46 -0700 Resent-Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 21:42:46 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <000501c0fb92$319020a0$7647a2ac default> References: <000501c0fb92$319020a0$7647a2ac default> Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 23:41:58 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: thomas malloy Subject: Re: Polarization Technologies For Gravity Waves (Arrays of Know How) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Resent-Message-ID: <"BDiu5.0.SR4.65iDx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43348 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Thomas Clark posted; > > Nutrino amplification technologies > Nutrinovotalic devices put out 1200 > watts > Convert nutrinos to electicity > Magnetic motors and solid state devices > that trap nutrinos > Sperical Harmonics This is the first I've heard of Nutrino amplification, tell me more. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Jun 24 21:43:05 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id VAA17871; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 21:42:31 -0700 Resent-Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 21:42:31 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 23:41:58 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: thomas malloy Subject: The Green Nazis Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Resent-Message-ID: <"8xaCe1.0.9N4.t4iDx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43346 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: > >I was reading the other day that if you grind up 100 tons of granite >>and process it you can recover 5 pounds of uranium. I had no idea >>that it was so plentiful. > >***{Yup, I've read that lots of places. Here's one of them: > >Bottom line: we ain't ever gonna run out of uranium, regardless of the >future availability of fossil fuels. (This civilization may collapse due to >lack of *access* to nuclear energy, of course--e.g., thanks to the mindless >crusades of the green Nazis--but that's another kettle of fish altogether.) > >"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value--i.e., zero." >--Voltaire Particularly true given the new grinder technology that I will be posting as soon as I get permission. BTW, ethical vegetarianism, not eating animals because you believe in their inherent rights, ecological consciousness, holding the environment to be of a higher importance than human beings and Nazism all spring from a common root. Paganism. Does this make sense based on your paraadigm Mitchell? I makes perfect sense based on mine. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Jun 24 23:03:54 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id XAA09446; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 23:01:25 -0700 Resent-Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 23:01:25 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <4.2.0.58.20010624221408.009ee4d0 postoffice.swbell.net> References: <4.2.0.58.20010624221408.009ee4d0 postoffice.swbell.net> Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 00:59:37 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: thomas malloy Subject: Re: Re; Getting Closer to Grand Unified? Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Resent-Message-ID: <"PtxGx3.0.WJ2.qEjDx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43349 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Charles Ford posted; > > >This seemed right to me at first. The problem then was how to go >about proving it. In the process of thinking it out I discovered a >rather large problem in the concept. This radiated wave could be >defined as a fixed amount of power. This would mean that the atom >is constantly throwing out energy. This violates conservation as >in "energy from ??? where ???" How about if the energy were coming out of the Aether Charles? > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 25 00:55:09 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id AAA32171; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 00:52:34 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 00:52:34 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Sender: mjones pop.jump.net Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 02:48:43 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Mitchell Jones Subject: Re: The Green Nazis Resent-Message-ID: <"vYmAT3.0.bs7.1tkDx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43350 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: >> >I was reading the other day that if you grind up 100 tons of granite >>>and process it you can recover 5 pounds of uranium. I had no idea >>>that it was so plentiful. >> >>***{Yup, I've read that lots of places. Here's one of them: >> >>Bottom line: we ain't ever gonna run out of uranium, regardless of the >>future availability of fossil fuels. (This civilization may collapse due to >>lack of *access* to nuclear energy, of course--e.g., thanks to the mindless >>crusades of the green Nazis--but that's another kettle of fish altogether.) >> >>"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value--i.e., zero." >>--Voltaire > >Particularly true given the new grinder technology that I will be >posting as soon as I get permission. > >BTW, ethical vegetarianism, not eating animals because you believe in >their inherent rights, ecological consciousness, holding the >environment to be of a higher importance than human beings and Nazism >all spring from a common root. Paganism. Does this make sense based >on your paraadigm Mitchell? I makes perfect sense based on mine. ***{I agree that environmentalism is a religion, and that in many people it takes the form of paganism. However, I do not agree that Christianity is any better than paganism, if that is what you are suggesting. "Paganism" is a generalized term that covers a lot of polytheistic religions, just as "Christianity" is a generalized term that covers a lot of allegedly "monotheistic" religions. As such, it is rather hard to say that Paganism is either more or less nutty than Christianity, without comparing a specific variant of the former to a specific variant of the latter. The ancient Germans, for example, worshiped trees and demons, and practiced human sacrifice. Their primary diety was a gigantic oak in the Black Forest of Germany which they called the Irmensul. From its limbs they hung prisoners captured in battle, upon whom they then inflicted the "death of a thousand cuts," so that the blood of the prisoners would water the Irmensul, their god, thereby strengthening him, so that by his increased power he could better aid them in their depredations. Clearly, they were certifiable nutters of the first water, little different from the Aztecs in their bloodthirsty and primitive ways. On the other hand, the infamous "Vlad the Impaler" was a Christian, and his treatment of prisoners was fully as horrible as that of the ancient Germans or the Aztecs: he had his men drive thousands of stakes into the ground, so that they stuck about 8 feet into the air. The stakes were then sharpened and greased, after which prisoners of war were subjected to rectal impalement on their tips, and left to die. As such, he was fully as loathsome as any pagan ever was, if not more so. Such behavior does not arise out of the differences between monotheists and polytheists, but rather out of the abandonment of reason which they share in common. It is simply a fact that theists believe the obvious absurdities of religion because they are more interested in fitting in than in finding the truth. Since this character flaw is exhibited by monotheists and polytheists alike, you cannot decide how crazy a particular theist is, by merely knowing whether he thinks he believes in one god or many. --Mitchell Jones}*** ________________ Quote of the month: "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value--i.e., zero." --Voltaire From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 25 07:35:21 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id HAA30154; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 07:34:52 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 07:34:52 -0700 Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 07:33:12 -0700 From: Jones Beene Subject: Hydro Environmental Resources, HERI To: vortex-l eskimo.com Message-id: <0GFH004B6PU1K8 mta8.pltn13.pbi.net> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Opera 5.11 build 904 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Resent-Message-ID: <"c49hN3.0.4N7.CmqDx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43351 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Vortexians, It is a bit suspicious to anyone on this forum who follows alternative energy technologies when, all at once, dozens of urgent press release issue out at exactly the same time proclaiming a major ground-shaking breakthrough. Not that the contibutors here are prescient or even all that diligent, but I think that we generally expend enough time and effort following the leads, that we expect when that long-sought-after goal of a major breakthrough is announced, that we will at least have heard in advance some small mention of the company or of the underlying technology. A further suspicion may be raised when the barrage of announcements comes not from a university, a private testing laboratory, a major journal, a national news organization or Infinite Energy, but instead from dozens of identical press releases that spread like radiation from brokerage house, supplemented by a few small-town reporters in such hi-tech centers as, where else, Las Vegas. Too many optimistic, forward-thinking, and formerly well-heeled investors have been duped by the promises of scam artists in numerous free energy niches that it behooves all of us to at least question the authenticity and accuracy of such thinly disguised "announcements," which are often in reality little more than blatant offers to sell risky stock Recently this scenario has been transpiring around yet another company with some tenuous claim of advanced hydrogen tech. called Hydro Environmental Resources, HERI, and yes, they have already filed with the SEC and have stock to sell you, BUT does anyone know anything about their process? I doubt it. The web site tells you little: http://hydrogenerate.com/home.html The company touts their "ElectroChem Hydrogen Fuel Reactor system" but barely describe its features while claiming to have a patent pending (I haven't yet been able to find it). The system will add "only a few pounds to the overall weight of a vehicle", or can be used in a $6000 2.5 kw home unit. That would be incredible if the "fuel" was water, but for $6k you can buy a diesel and reputable companies such as Capstone will soon have home turbines available, so what's the fuss? Never mind, just buy the stock, is the message from this company, who by the way, can only be reached through a PR firm. "Successful tests have been held on city streets, as well as highway conditions. The purpose of the tests was to establish the viability of the 'second stage' of modification. Test results are expected to be released to the public shortly." In the mean time don't forget to call your broker. Regards, Jones Beene From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 25 08:58:23 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id IAA28257; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 08:57:54 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 08:57:54 -0700 Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20010625112919.02a9bc30 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 11:57:50 -0400 To: vortex-L eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: Uranium in granite In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <"3lJ171.0.Kv6.1-rDx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43352 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: thomas malloy wrote: >> >I was reading the other day that if you grind up 100 tons of granite >>>and process it you can recover 5 pounds of uranium. I had no idea >>>that it was so plentiful. Arthur Clarke quoted Harrison Brown, The Challenge of Man's Future, (The Viking Press, New York, 1954): One hundred tons of average igneous rock such as granite contains 8 tons of aluminum, 5 tons of iron, 1,200 pounds of titanium, 180 pounds of manganese, 70 pounds of chromium, 40 pounds of nickel, 30 pounds of vanadium, 20 pounds of copper, 10 pounds of tungsten, and 4 pounds of lead. Clarke added: To extract these elements would require not only advanced chemical techniques, but very considerable amounts of energy. The rock would first have to be crushed, then treated by heat, electrolysis, and other means. However, as Harrison Brown also points out, a ton of granite contains enough uranium and thorium to provide energy equivalent to fifty tons of coal. All the energy we need for the processing is there in the rock itself. - from "Profiles of the Future," 1963 However, at present there is a huge supply of uranium -- a glut actually. The ore already discovered will last 70 to 100 years easily, even with today's reactors, which only extract 5% of the usable energy. So there would be no point in developing technology to extract uranium from granite at the present time. Uranium is also found in seawater at 0.0015 to 0.0032 ppm (from different estimates). It is the 23rd most common element in seawater. It is found at about 50 ppm in some granite, and at much higher concentrations in ore worth mining. The distribution of uranium in the earth's crust is an interesting problem. Quote: "in the oceanic mantle [it] is about 0.004 ppm. The continental crust, on the other hand, is relatively enriched in uranium at some 1.4 ppm. This represents a 70-fold enrichment compared with the primitive mantle." How it got that way is described in this paper: http://www.uilondon.org/pdf/arculus.pdf See also: http://www.antenna.nl/wise/uranium/rup.html http://www.personal.psu.edu/dept/aquarium/Chem.htm Mitchell Jones wrote: Bottom line: we ain't ever gonna run out of uranium, regardless of the future availability of fossil fuels. We ain't ever gonna run out of ANYTHING. Our only problem is having too many resources in the wrong places, also known as pollution. As Clarke put it: . . . there need never be any permanent shortage of raw materials. Yet Sir George Darwin's prediction that ours would be a golden age compared with the aeons of poverty to follow, may well be perfectly correct. In this inconceivably enormous universe, we can never run out of energy or matter. But we can all too easily run out of brains. - from "Profiles of the Future," 1963 - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 25 11:50:58 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id LAA27622; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 11:50:10 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 11:50:10 -0700 Message-ID: <3B37882D.36D8D995 bellsouth.net> Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 14:51:26 -0400 From: Terry Blanton X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Kiting the Pyramids Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"VJj1k2.0.Tl6.XVuDx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43353 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Did Egyptians use kites (not kikes!) to raise the pyramids? See: http://abcnews.go.com/sections/wnt/DailyNews/wnt_pyramid010624.html Terry From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 25 12:04:28 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id MAA00348; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 12:04:02 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 12:04:02 -0700 Message-ID: <3B378B75.B19B1B2C bellsouth.net> Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 15:05:25 -0400 From: Terry Blanton X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: A MOVing Experience Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"V-rEn.0.K5.WiuDx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43355 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Wonder what Scott Little has been up to lately? Examining a strange flying disc. . . http://www.nidsci.org/news/varistor.pdf Terry From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 25 12:05:00 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id MAA32188; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 12:02:32 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 12:02:32 -0700 Message-ID: <000f01c0fd9e$c3604420$a0181ad8 oemcomputer> From: "Bruce Meland" To: Cc: Subject: Fw: Streisand Urges Fans to be Energy Efficient Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 10:46:26 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Resent-Message-ID: <"4e1oD2.0.cs7.5huDx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43354 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: In our free market system, as long as someone has the money like Barbara or corporate power to manipulate the energy prices like Enron, have rights to do what pleases them and their bottom line? >From: >http://www.nypost.com/06242001/news/nationalnews/33260.htm > >HYPOCRITE STREISAND TAKES THE HEAT >By BRADEN KEIL > >June 24, 2001 -- Barbra Streisand is urging her fans to be more energy >efficient - but she's not practicing what she preaches. > >She still flies on fossil fuel-sucking private jets, roams the roads in >gas-guzzling limos and SUVs, and vacations on big power boats. > >She routinely keeps the central air conditioning blasting frigid air in her >many homes - including her Manhattan penthouse - even when she's thousands >of miles away. > >"She is someone who cannot be hot, not even for a minute," says a Streisand >confidant. "Maybe it's menopause, but she refuses to sweat. She has her >trainers over and it's like 30 degrees in her house. She freaks if she walks >into a warm room." > >A far cry from the energy-conservation advice on her Web site >(http://www.barbrastreisand.com), where she implores fellow Californians to >turn their thermostats up to 78 degrees when they're home, and 85 degrees >when they're out. > >"She'd melt like the wicked witch in 'The Wizard of Oz' if her place was 78 >degrees, much less 85," our source noted. > >When asked what, if any, of the energy-saving advice on the Streisand Web >site was being followed by the conservation-crusading star, her spokesman >told a reporter last week, "She never meant that it necessarily applied to >her." > >In her Central Park West triplex, which has been for sale for the past two >years, the multizone air conditioning keeps the 16 rooms as cold as a meat >locker. > >"At this point, it's just cold storage for all of her furs," growled one >recent visitor. > >To insure that the ice princess doesn't thaw out, or melt, Streisand has >installed a separate, industrial-size air-conditioning system just to keep >her cavernous master bedroom super cool. > >On the West Coast, Streisand is an energy-consuming machine, sharing not >one, but three houses with actor-Aamco-pitchman hubby James Brolin. > >The houses are on three acres of Malibu oceanfront - along with two pools, >saunas, hot tubs, and lush landscaping that's kept in pristine condition by >10 full-time gardeners. > > > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 25 13:20:38 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id NAA29358; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 13:20:07 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 13:20:07 -0700 Message-ID: <00ee01c0fdab$c2d444e0$8eb4bfa8 computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: Cc: Subject: Re: Getting Closer to Grand Unified? Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 14:19:20 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Resent-Message-ID: <"ThwdL2.0.eA7.spvDx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43356 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Since the Wave-Circle/String-Circle Model implies that generated EM field coupling to the gravitomagnetic field would require frequencies of ~ 1.03E25 Hz i.e.., wavelengths of about 2.9E-17 meters (which explains why matter is Transparent to the gravitomagnetic field) it looks like the T.T. Brown and Wallace Effects, that manipulate the Nuclear Spin Alignment of various materials are ways to achieve antigravity/gravity-screening. For the Wallace & Brown Effects see: http://home.att.net/~kfbrown/ng.html http://soteria.com/brown/ Regards, Frederick From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 25 13:47:05 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id NAA09267; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 13:46:03 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 13:46:03 -0700 Message-ID: <001501c0fdad$3c280880$c9181ad8 oemcomputer> From: "Bruce Meland" To: Subject: Re: Dr. Chung's Negative Resistance Replicated Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 12:29:48 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Resent-Message-ID: <"XbFlV1.0.jG2.ACwDx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43357 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: I have very clear evidence there is devices that convert forms of neutrionos, gama rays and forms of magnetism to electricity. these individuals and you are refering to are out of the loop. The secret is resonance of devices(mosfets that are tuned to 10 to the 30th power many times the frequency of light. 2 electrical wizzards have done it and if you have 10 million you can have a licence to the technology perhaps. Bruce -----Original Message----- From: R. Wormus To: vortex-l eskimo.com Date: Saturday, June 16, 2001 2:45 PM Subject: Re: Dr. Chung's Negative Resistance Replicated >Bruce, >No, it is a fact. Read the info. at JLN's site. >Ron > >On 16-Jun-01, Bruce Meland etimes teleport.com wrote: > >BM> I hope that was a sarcastic remark. >BM> -----Original Message----- >BM> From: Rick Monteverde >BM> To: vortex-l eskimo.com >BM> Date: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 12:38 PM >BM> Subject: Re: Fw: Dr. Chung's Negative Resistance Replicated >BM> >BM> >BM>> Bruce - >BM>> >BM>> You do know that this isn't any kind of vacuum coherer or potential >BM>> energy source, don't you? Even JLN and others on that list are clear >BM>> on that. >BM>> >BM>> - Rick Monteverde >BM>> Honolulu, HI >BM>> >BM>> >BM> >-- > > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 25 14:07:41 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id OAA19350; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 14:07:07 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 14:07:07 -0700 Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 14:05:03 -0700 From: Jones Beene Subject: Re: A MOVing Experience To: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-to: jonesb9 pacbell.net Message-id: <0GFI005SF7Z6G1 mta8.pltn13.pbi.net> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Opera 5.11 build 904 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Resent-Message-ID: <"VDQrv3.0.Ck4.wVwDx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43358 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Terry Blanton wrote: >Wonder what Scott Little has been up to lately? Examining a >strange flying disc. . . >http://www.nidsci.org/news/varistor.pdf Tres Cool ! Thanks to Scott for writing up a careful investigation in such a way that it reads like a short Sci-Fi piece. Just think what would have happened if one of the hyper-aggressive UFO proponents, like Lt. Col. Philip J. Corso, had gotten hold of this object first? Choices: a) sent it over to EarthTech for testing... yeah, right. b) stopped lab work when the bismuth showed up and called a press conference to announce undeniable proof of aliens c) written another silly book while inviting numerous ex-spook speakers over to gloat at a World Conference ($1000/pop). d) still trying to use it to "call home"? e) put it up for auction on eBay, starting bid $5 million Hey, they solve 30 year old murders with a single strand of fiber left at the scene, yet in the "hundreds" of "verified" UFO encounters, not a single reptillian skin flake or silver jumpsuit fiber has turned up. Maybe they need to get the CSI team in on the investigation!! From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 25 15:24:37 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id PAA19525; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 15:24:02 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 15:24:02 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: rick mail.highsurf.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <001501c0fdad$3c280880$c9181ad8 oemcomputer> References: <001501c0fdad$3c280880$c9181ad8 oemcomputer> Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 12:23:49 -1000 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Rick Monteverde Subject: Re: Dr. Chung's Negative Resistance Replicated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Resent-Message-ID: <"aGV9I3.0._m4.2exDx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43359 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Bruce - At 12:29 PM -0700 6/25/01, Bruce Meland wrote: >I have very clear evidence there is devices that convert forms of >neutrionos, gama rays and forms of magnetism to electricity. There is not and there will NEVER be any device that will produce usable amounts of electricity from any form of magnetism! Anyone that says they have one is just trying to sell you a free energy scam. - Rick Monteverde Honolulu, HI From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 25 18:02:53 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id SAA17804; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 18:02:31 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 18:02:31 -0700 Message-ID: <3B37DF3B.EE8FA400 suite224.net> Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 21:02:51 -0400 From: "Francis J. Stenger" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Win95; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Dr. Chung's Negative Resistance Replicated References: <001501c0fdad$3c280880$c9181ad8 oemcomputer> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"cY2zr3.0.6M4.cyzDx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43360 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Rick Monteverde wrote: > > There is not and there will NEVER be any device that will produce > usable amounts of electricity from any form of magnetism! Anyone that > says they have one is just trying to sell you a free energy scam. Spoken like a true graduate of the SMOT INSTITUTE OF MAGNETIC SCAMS, Rick! Even now, however, it's sometimes hard to pass up a pile of ceramic magnets without grabbing for my balls (steel, that is). :-) Frank Stenger From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 25 19:38:57 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id TAA19225; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 19:38:38 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 19:38:38 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: rick mail.highsurf.com (Unverified) Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <3B37882D.36D8D995 bellsouth.net> References: <3B37882D.36D8D995 bellsouth.net> Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 16:10:46 -1000 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Rick Monteverde Subject: Re: Kiting the Pyramids Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Resent-Message-ID: <"rJiLd3.0.2i4.iM_Dx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43362 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Saw that! I'd posted some stuff somewhere online a year or more ago about possibly windsurfing the pyramids. Those pivot arm rigs they've used over to lift water to the irrigation canals over there since ancient times - forget what they're called - just put a sail on those things and there's plenty of power to winch blocks up a really steep ramp like the side of a pyramid. Only enough of a dirt ramp to make it muddy would have been needed. Sails would be much simpler than kites, and more easily controllable. Synchronized sheeting in and out on a bunch of them ganged together and there's a *lot* of motive force on a good wind. - Rick Monteverde Honolulu, HI >Did Egyptians use kites (not kikes!) to raise the pyramids? See: > >http://abcnews.go.com/sections/wnt/DailyNews/wnt_pyramid010624.html > >Terry From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 25 19:38:58 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id TAA19175; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 19:38:32 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 19:38:32 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: rick mail.highsurf.com (Unverified) Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <3B37DF3B.EE8FA400 suite224.net> References: <001501c0fdad$3c280880$c9181ad8 oemcomputer> <3B37DF3B.EE8FA400@suite224.net> Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 16:05:09 -1000 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Rick Monteverde Subject: Re: Dr. Chung's Negative Resistance Replicated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Resent-Message-ID: <"R0XOo3.0.Dh4.cM_Dx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43361 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Frank - Right, and never mind the nutrioiosinios or whatever they were, I'm just talking about the magnetism. Actually there's these machines with magnets in them where you spin a shaft and supposedly electricity comes out of them. They have them in California I think, but they don't use them as much any more I hear. Which makes me wonder, if there's some difference between "motional B fields" and "normal B fields" as has been claimed here and there, then wouldn't opposing one with the other leave some sort of residue hanging around, like free energy or mass fluctuations or something? - Rick Monteverde Honolulu, HI >Rick Monteverde wrote: >> >> There is not and there will NEVER be any device that will produce >> usable amounts of electricity from any form of magnetism! Anyone that >> says they have one is just trying to sell you a free energy scam. > >Spoken like a true graduate of the SMOT INSTITUTE OF MAGNETIC SCAMS, >Rick! > >Even now, however, it's sometimes hard to pass up a pile of ceramic >magnets without grabbing for my balls (steel, that is). :-) > >Frank Stenger From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 25 21:09:29 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id VAA21693; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 21:08:57 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 21:08:57 -0700 Message-ID: <013601c0fded$43350ac0$8eb4bfa8 computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: Cc: Subject: Re: Fishbowl-Van de Graaff Antigrav Unit Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 22:06:48 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Resent-Message-ID: <"uie7A2.0.sI5.Ph0Ex" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43363 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Here you go Charles. Since you want a "bowl shape", silver the inside and the top hemisphere of the outside of a large glass globe/fishbowl, and adapt it to a high school grade Van de Graaff Generator. Set this "Leyden Jar" type Flying Saucer on a scale and tie the silver "hemisphere cap" to earth ground, and fire it up. With 500,000 volts or so on it, it should show a decent weight reduction. CAUTION: THE CAPACITANCE CHARGE ON THIS COULD BE LETHAL!! Regards, Frederick From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 25 22:00:28 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id VAA05348; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 21:59:39 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 21:59:39 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Sender: mjones pop.jump.net Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <3B37882D.36D8D995 bellsouth.net> Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 20:08:07 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Mitchell Jones Subject: Re: Kiting the Pyramids Resent-Message-ID: <"FPAFW1.0.OJ1.vQ1Ex" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43364 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: >Did Egyptians use kites (not kikes!) to raise the pyramids? See: > >http://abcnews.go.com/sections/wnt/DailyNews/wnt_pyramid010624.html > >Terry ***{There are ancient Egyptian paintings showing teams of slaves hauling blocks of stone along using ropes, with other slaves pouring oil on the ground in front of the stones to make them slide more easily. The question is: what is the source of the aversion people have to accepting the testimony of the ancient Egyptians themselves, regarding how they moved the blocks into place? --MJ}*** ________________ Quote of the month: "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value--i.e., zero." --Voltaire From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 25 23:34:31 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id XAA31558; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 23:33:42 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 23:33:42 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 01:32:57 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: thomas malloy Subject: Re: The Green Nazis Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Resent-Message-ID: <"0cIs82.0.yi7.1p2Ex" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43365 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: > >latter. The ancient Germans, for example, worshiped trees and demons, and >practiced human sacrifice. Their primary diety was a gigantic oak in the >Black Forest of Germany which they called the Irmensul. From its limbs they >hung prisoners captured in battle, upon whom they then inflicted the "death >of a thousand cuts," How classically German of them. >On the other hand, the infamous >"Vlad the Impaler" was a Christian, and his treatment of prisoners was >fully as horrible as that of the ancient Germans or the Aztecs: he had his You have to realize that anyone can call them selves a Christian. Loving you enemies is oxymoronic to impaling them however. The organization that killed more Christians than any other was the Roman church, which is a mixture of paganism and Christianity. You will see that in the latter days, that they will return to this activity. They have declared Sunday to the the Sabbath, in contradiction of scripture and declared those of us who keep the seventh day Sabbath to be heretics, and you know what they do to heretics. > Since this character flaw is exhibited by monotheists and >polytheists alike, you cannot decide how crazy a particular theist is, by I think you would agree, Mitchell, that if there is a G-d who is planning a judgement, believing in him, and doing his will, is will is not crazy. >merely knowing whether he thinks he believes in one god or many. You have to realize that there are two superhuman beings who have both established monotheistic religions, Jehovah and Lucifer. Lucifer also established the pagan religions. Most Pagans don't realize this, but you can see it from their fruits. > >--Mitchell Jones}*** >________________ >Quote of the month: > >"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value--i.e., zero." >--Voltaire OTOH, as long as you can exchange that paper for what you want, you never want to forget that paper based investment yield interest. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 25 23:34:33 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id XAA31627; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 23:34:02 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 23:34:02 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <0GFH004B6PU1K8 mta8.pltn13.pbi.net> References: <0GFH004B6PU1K8 mta8.pltn13.pbi.net> Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 01:32:57 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: thomas malloy Subject: Re: Hydro Environmental Resources, HERI Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Resent-Message-ID: <"1dFw53.0.wj7.Ip2Ex" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43366 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: >Vortexians, > It is a bit suspicious to anyone on this forum who follows alternative energy I agree >and have stock to sell you, BUT does anyone know anything about their >process? I doubt it. The web site tells you little: >http://hydrogenerate.com/home.html > >The company touts their "ElectroChem Hydrogen Fuel Reactor system" but I'm suspicious of a company that doesn't have any contact information. > > In the mean time don't forget to call your broker. Nothing I ever learned in Chemistry could account for what they are claiming. I wouldn't invest unless I witnessed a demonstration of their technology. > >Regards, > >Jones Beene From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 25 23:34:38 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id XAA31664; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 23:34:17 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 23:34:17 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <000f01c0fd9e$c3604420$a0181ad8 oemcomputer> References: <000f01c0fd9e$c3604420$a0181ad8 oemcomputer> Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 01:32:57 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: thomas malloy Subject: Re: Fw: Streisand Urges Fans to be Energy Efficient Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Resent-Message-ID: <"SBQuP.0.Lk7.Sp2Ex" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43367 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: > > > >>HYPOCRITE STREISAND TAKES THE HEAT >>By BRADEN KEIL >> > >June 24, 2001 -- Barbra Streisand is urging her fans to be more energy This is a good one Bruce. I"m going to forward that email to Rush Limbaugh! From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Jun 25 23:36:18 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx2.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id XAA09480; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 23:34:09 -0700 (PDT) Resent-Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 23:34:09 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: <001501c0fdad$3c280880$c9181ad8 oemcomputer> Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 01:32:57 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: thomas malloy Subject: Re: Dr. Chung's Negative Resistance Replicated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Resent-Message-ID: <"uMrPQ.0.2K2.Vp2Ex" mx2> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43368 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: >Bruce - > >At 12:29 PM -0700 6/25/01, Bruce Meland wrote: > >>I have very clear evidence there is devices that convert forms of >>neutrionos, gama rays and forms of magnetism to electricity. > >There is not and there will NEVER be any device that will produce >usable amounts of electricity from any form of magnetism! Anyone >that says they have one is just trying to sell you a free energy >scam. > >- Rick Monteverde >Honolulu, HI Yah for $10,000,000 From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 26 00:12:15 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id AAA10025; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 00:11:53 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 00:11:53 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Sender: mjones pop.jump.net Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 02:10:08 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Mitchell Jones Subject: Re: The Green Nazis Resent-Message-ID: <"RZYXZ2.0.ZS2.uM3Ex" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43369 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Thomas Malloy wrote: >I think you would agree, Mitchell, that if there is a G-d who is >planning a judgement, believing in him, and doing his will, is will >is not crazy. ***{I'll grant that if the facts indicated the existence of a "God" (or of "gods," for that matter)--which they don't--then believing in him (or them) would not be crazy. However, that doesn't imply we ought to give a hoot in hell about "doing his (or their) will," and you may rest assured that I wouldn't. I don't like being ordered around, Thomas. Slavery is abhorrent to me, regardless of whether I am to be ruled by men or by gods. Result: as long as I remained vulnerable to being oppressed, I would ceaselessly search for a way to extract myself from that situation. It is just the way I am. --MJ}*** [snip] >>"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value--i.e., zero." >>--Voltaire > >OTOH, as long as you can exchange that paper for what you want, you >never want to forget that paper based investment yield interest. ***{If the Fed cuts rates by another half-point this week, the fed funds rate will be less than the rate of inflation, and storable commodities--e.g., gold and silver--will begin to pay interest. Rogue banks, for example, will be able to borrow at the fed funds rate, buy gold, and pay the interest out of part of the rate of increase in the gold price, keeping the remainder for themselves as profit. Most would not dare to offend the Fed by doing that, of course, but the point is that as more and more market interest rates fall below the rate of inflation, more and more people will be in a position to borrow at less than the rate of inflation, put the money in storable commodities, and lock in a sure profit. Result: gold, silver, and other storable commodities will blow out, and begin a massive new bull market, while stock markets and paper currencies crash. --MJ}*** ________________ Quote of the month: "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value--i.e., zero." --Voltaire From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 26 01:20:04 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id BAA27434; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 01:18:48 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 01:18:48 -0700 Message-ID: <003001c0fe18$f06699e0$648f209a ggrf30j> From: "Nick Palmer" To: Cc: "Thomas D. Clark" References: <000601c0fb92$489cb380$7647a2ac default> Subject: Re: New devices to block out DEW and Gravity DEW Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 09:20:55 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Resent-Message-ID: <"xt2aU.0.Zi6.eL4Ex" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43370 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Anybody else getting sick of this longwinded Thomas Clark and his Radiation Health Foundation rubbish? - no wonder we don't see Scott Little here much anymore... Nick Palmer From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 26 03:57:52 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id DAA23032; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 03:57:26 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 03:57:26 -0700 Message-ID: <001601c0fe48$43457620$d456ccd1 asus> From: "Mike Carrell" To: References: <3B37882D.36D8D995 bellsouth.net> Subject: Re: Kiting the Pyramids Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 06:58:43 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Resent-Message-ID: <"Onija.0.od5.Lg6Ex" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43371 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Before we get carried away, so to speak, consider the following facts about Khufu, the Great Pyramid: Built in 23 years according to historical records. Contains an estimated 2.3 million 'core' limestone blocks. "Average" weight of blocks 2.5 tons, some much larger. Assume 180 work days per year, 8 hours labor per day. That's 1.1 block per minute, quarried, prepared and placed. Mass flow about 5500 lb/min., sustained for 23 years. That production rate is conveniently ignored in most scenarios about pyramid construction, because it blows the model out of the water. They don't work, because the authors are looking in the wrong place and wind up with a great mystery. It could be done, using a materials technology available to the ancient Egyptians, utilizing a soft, clay-bearing limestone abundant at the Giza plateau. It disaggregates when soaked in water, but with some additives a cement is formed which adheres to the limestone and hardens to stone-like strength and hardness. The composite can be poured or tamped into molds, producing hard limestone with the appearance of native rock. Building Khufu took only a few thousand men, doing seasonal work. Quite doable when seen correctly. The man who saw it is Dr. Joseph Davidovits, a chemist, who discovered the 'Geopolymer' technology in the 20th century and realized that the essential chemistry was available in materials used daily in ancient Egypt. Mike Carrell From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 26 05:42:34 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id FAA15408; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 05:42:09 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 05:42:09 -0700 Message-ID: <3B388375.AD0C3827 bellsouth.net> Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 08:43:33 -0400 From: Terry Blanton X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Dr. Chung's Negative Resistance Replicated References: <001501c0fdad$3c280880$c9181ad8 oemcomputer> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"Vbsyr3.0.bm3.WC8Ex" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43372 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Rick Monteverde wrote: > There is not and there will NEVER be any device that will produce > usable amounts of electricity from any form of magnetism! But, Rick, *all* rotating generators use magnetism! See, you have this thing called a field coil . . . Terry hee, hee From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 26 07:28:20 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id HAA16905; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 07:27:54 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 07:27:54 -0700 Message-ID: <017501c0fe43$babebc20$8eb4bfa8 computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: Cc: Subject: Re: Antigravity: Only a Materials Problem? Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 08:25:36 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Resent-Message-ID: <"Oz5oE1.0.184.fl9Ex" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43373 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: In the Biefield-Brown Effect, the "Tug of War" between the Electrical and the Gravitational Field Susceptibilities of the nucleons/atoms suggests that a materials optimization problem exists. Since it is rather obvious that the Gravitational Field is Immutable, the only recourse is to electrically align the nucleons/atoms of the "shell" of a "craft" so that it's gravitational field Repels the gravitational field of the Earth, or the Sun or other large masses. T. T. Brown's experiments as well as those of H. Wallace were pointing in this direction. Using the Van de Graaff generator configuration, where a large metal cavity with a dielectric/insulating-coating covered by a lightweight conductive coating with the resulting high intensity electric field should be able to align the nucleons/atoms of the dielectric/insulating-coating so that they repel the Gravitational Field. This results in No Net Charge for the craft, since the high intensity field is generated by using the Van de Graaff to "pump" electrons from the outer coating into the metal cavity which is a field-free region that can be occupied hazard-free by operating personnel. The energy necessary to run the "pump" can be approximated by the energy, w = 1/2CV^2 times efficiency factor, plus losses. IOW, there is No Free Lunch. Interestingly the Corning type 008 Soda Lime glass has a dielectric constant of 8.0 and a dielectric strength of 3,000 to 8,000 volts/mil. OTOH, the higher dielectric constant materials may not necessarily be the materials required for optimization. Regards, Frederick From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 26 07:44:57 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id HAA21962; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 07:44:22 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 07:44:22 -0700 Message-ID: <001501c0fe6c$3d53d080$823f8aac default> From: "Thomas D. Clark" To: "vortex" , Cc: "Thomas D. Clark" Subject: Re: Polarization Technologies For Gravity Waves (Arrays of Know How) Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 11:11:36 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3612.1700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3612.1700 X-Apparently-From: Ethicsj aol.com Resent-Message-ID: <"XUPFr1.0._M5.5_9Ex" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43374 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: temalloy metro.lakes.com Dear Mr. Thomas Malloy: Thank you for sending me an email in response to my email on Polarization Technologies For Gravity Waves You mentioned "This is the first I've heard of Nutrino amplification, tell me more.". I just read a U.S. military manual in government documents in Ashland Oregon Library, in 1997, which listed U.S. military arrays of technical know how but it did list any details. I photocopied a few page in manual in relation to laser technologies which I was interested in at the time. I just posted some of the technologies off of the list at the vortex email list. I am presently focusing my time on developing sound/aehter force fields similar to Keely's force fields, since they require very little power and few moving parts. I do not presently have the funds to research and produce such complex technologies as subatomic nuclear accelerators or amplification techniques. But I am interested in reading about the sub atomic technologies, in case I ever come across the funds and legitimate legal permission to develop such technologies. Respectively, Thomas Clark Email: tom rhfweb.com Web site: www.rhfweb.com\personal From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 26 07:44:57 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id HAA22039; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 07:44:26 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 07:44:26 -0700 Message-ID: <001701c0fe6c$3f3a91e0$823f8aac default> From: "Thomas D. Clark" To: "vortex" Cc: "Thomas D. Clark" Subject: Sound/Magnetic-Electrical Belt force Fields to Block out all DEW Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 11:17:10 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3612.1700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3612.1700 X-Apparently-From: Ethicsj aol.com Resent-Message-ID: <"BI5_13.0.1O5.A_9Ex" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43375 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Sound/Magnetic-Electrical Belt force Fields to Block out all DEW I am presently working on a device which requires very little energy, and no moving parts and can be made form metal pipes to create a perfect resonant force field around any object including the human body to block out DEW. I am taking the basic higher light resonant frequencies for the human body and other spherical objects, and then translating those frequencies into proportionate sound/cosmic waves. Those sound/cosmic waves can be produced by metal pipes and instruments similar to a keyboard or violin. One can make a small belt with no electrical parts or complex parts other than precise proportionate energy wave guides in relation to the human object field which one can wear which produces the unique tones to create a perfect resonant force field around the human body which should be able to block out all DEW. Such force field can be of sound or other cosmic or magnetic electrical energies. Such devices are not illegal to build as far as I know, since such technologies do not officially exist, according misinformation scientific dogmas. Respectively, Thomas Clark Email: tom rhfweb.com Web site: www.rhfweb.com\personal From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 26 08:36:54 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id IAA05686; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 08:36:28 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 08:36:28 -0700 From: Standing Bear To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: The Green Nazis Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 11:41:47 -0700 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.1.99] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01062611414700.03429 linux> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id IAA05650 Resent-Message-ID: <"fzhaL3.0.lO1.ylAEx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43376 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: On Sunday 24 June 2001 21:41, thomas malloy wrote: > > >I was reading the other day that if you grind up 100 tons of granite > >>and process it you can recover 5 pounds of uranium. I had no idea > >>that it was so plentiful. > > > >***{Yup, I've read that lots of places. Here's one of them: > > > >Bottom line: we ain't ever gonna run out of uranium, regardless of the > >future availability of fossil fuels. (This civilization may collapse due to > >lack of *access* to nuclear energy, of course--e.g., thanks to the mindless > >crusades of the green Nazis--but that's another kettle of fish altogether.) > > > >"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value--i.e., zero." > >--Voltaire > > Particularly true given the new grinder technology that I will be > posting as soon as I get permission. > > BTW, ethical vegetarianism, not eating animals because you believe in > their inherent rights, ecological consciousness, holding the > environment to be of a higher importance than human beings and Nazism > all spring from a common root. Paganism. Does this make sense based > on your paraadigm Mitchell? I makes perfect sense based on mine. All these 'izms'! So little common sense! Makes one think that the funny mushrooms have proliferated and sent their whatevers into the air for everyone to 'ingest'. Besides, what is wrong with 'paganism'? Paganism stands for not anything really, or whatever is different from YOUR particular trendy opiate of the masses, as Lenin would put it. All those 'ism's' get in the way of understanding by forcing a two dimensional view of the universe through a screen of pigeonholes. Progress is not made that way. Classification of some things is fine. Carried to extremes it progressively evolves into prejudice and stigmatization based petty differences. As the Jews would say: .........."Enough already!" Standing Bear rockcast net-link.net We need not search the world for 'nutzies', they are all around us, creating small boxes enabling dimwits to confuse understanding with obfuscation and confusion. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 26 08:53:42 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id IAA11394; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 08:52:38 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 08:52:38 -0700 Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20010626113353.02ab27d0 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 11:52:29 -0400 To: vortex-l eskimo.com, From: Jed Rothwell Subject: Re: Kiting the Pyramids In-Reply-To: <001601c0fe48$43457620$d456ccd1 asus> References: <3B37882D.36D8D995 bellsouth.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <"hzS1-.0.yn2.6_AEx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43377 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Mike Carrell wrote: >It could be done, using a materials technology available to the ancient >Egyptians, utilizing a soft, clay-bearing limestone abundant at the Giza >plateau. It disaggregates when soaked in water, but with some additives a >cement is formed which adheres to the limestone and hardens to stone-like >strength and hardness. I have read about this hypothesis, but I do not think it is correct. I saw a documentary on PBS many years ago made by an archeologist and a hundred or so Egyptians from their national museum. Using primitive tools, techniques animal and human power (but some modern safety equipment), they quarried several blocks the size of those used in the pyramids, transported them a considerable distance, and built a partial miniature pyramid maybe 20 meters tall, with the same angles, distances and stresses as full scale construction would require. Of course it was remarkable engineering, and difficult, dangerous work, but it was easy to see that in 20 years a large group of workers could have built the full scale pyramids. The economic system, agriculture food storage warehouses could easily support the required number of workers. Much larger facilities and better logistics were needed for armies and wars. I believe the quarries for the pyramids are known to be at Arabian Mountain, on the other side of the Nile. I have seen similar documentaries showing a few hundred people moving and raising a concrete block the same size as the Stonehenge components, and people on Easter Island cutting and moving aku-aku statues. The Great Wall of China was constructed from huge blocks of stone. In modern time, the U.S. transcontinental railroad was built almost entirely with animal and manpower, except for the use of black powder for tunnelling, which proceeded at 1 foot per day, per face. - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 26 09:22:41 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id JAA27074; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 09:22:18 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 09:22:18 -0700 Message-ID: <01ab01c0fe53$adb784c0$8eb4bfa8 computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: "Jim Dickenson" Cc: , , References: <52DBB3BCABE4D411949E00508BE7906A0106B8 SERVER3> Subject: Re: String Circle Theory Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 10:20:56 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_019B_01C0FE29.B07BEE00" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Resent-Message-ID: <"OqItp.0.tc6.wQBEx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43378 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_019B_01C0FE29.B07BEE00 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jim Dickenson" To: "'Frederick Sparber'" Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2001 8:41 AM Subject: String Circle Theory Hi Jim, I'll try to pull this together for you. > Dear Fred, > > I really enjoyed reading your String Circle paper, I was going over > it last night. I have a couple of questions on how you did some derivations > and it's probably because I'm a bit rusty in physics these days ;) > > I'm not completely clear on how you did the conversion of the Big G > to the em units This was arrived at by a lot of trial-and-error number crunching. :-) The force, F between two undilated magnetic "point poles" or current loops, M1 & M2 where M is in Ampere-Meters: F = 1.0E-7*M1*M2/R^2 Here: 1.0E-7*4.8E-11^2/1^2 = 2.304E-28 nt, the same value as kq^2 (much to my surprise) indicates that the dilated Ampere-Meters of 1.43E-29 (0.02583 times the String Circle mass) is showing the magnitude of the time dilation: 4.8E-11/1.43E-29 = 3.36E18 On a hunch I divided Big G by 1.0E-7 and took the square root of it (since G is a squared-quantity times a constant): Fg = 6.67E-11*m1*m2/R^2 (nt) (6.67E-11/1.0E-7)^1/2 = 0.02583 Ampere-Meters/Kg Thus for the Earth's g force Fg on a 1.0 Kg mass: Fg = 1.0E-7 * 0.02583*5.98E24*0.02583*1.0/6.38E6^2 = 9.8 nt A numbers trick? I think/hope not.:-) > and I am also a little unclear of where the 4.8E-11 is > derived. First of all the String Circle radius is derived: R = kq^2/E E for a String Circle 1/3 the mass of a proton = 5.0E-11 (joule). Then R = 2.304E-28/5.0E-11 = 4.6E-18 (meters) Then to get the undilated 4.8E-11 Ampere-Meter "Loop Displacement Current": I = q*f = 1.6E-19*1.04E25 = 1.66E6 (Amperes) Then I*2(pi)R = 1.66E6*2(pi)*4.6E-18 = 4.8E-11 Ampere-Meters. > It's been a long time since I have done much in SR. The time dilation effect due to the constant acceleration of the String Circle which is derived from GR. IOW the circling velocity is c, but the direction is constantly changing, thus the slowing of the "clock"(in this case the frequency f or displacement current I is reduced by ~18 orders of magnitude) due to the constant acceleration, thus the weak gravity field. > > If you don't mind expanding a bit on your derivations, I would > greatly appreciate it :) and please feel free to post this and any replies > to the group. Thanks for the note. I hope this helps. Regards, Frederick > > Thanks and Best Regards, > > Jim Dickenson. > > > ------=_NextPart_000_019B_01C0FE29.B07BEE00 Content-Type: application/msword; name="String-Circle Particles.doc" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="String-Circle Particles.doc" 0M8R4KGxGuEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAPgADAP7/CQAGAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABAAAAJAAAAAAAAAAA EAAAJgAAAAEAAAD+////AAAAACMAAAD///////////////////////////////////////////// //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////s pcEAWQAJBAAAABK/AAAAAAAAEAAAAAAABAAA2goAAA4AYmpiavNX81cAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAJBBYAHhQAAJE9AQCRPQEA2gYAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAD//w8AAAAA AAAAAAD//w8AAAAAAAAAAAD//w8AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAF0AAAAAAJIAAAAAAAAAkgAAAJIA AAAAAAAAkgAAAAAAAACSAAAAAAAAAJIAAAAAAAAAkgAAABQAAAAAAAAAAAAAAKYAAAAAAAAApgAA AAAAAACmAAAAAAAAAKYAAAAAAAAApgAAAAwAAACyAAAAFAAAAKYAAAAAAAAAGAgAALYAAADSAAAA AAAAANIAAAAAAAAA0gAAAAAAAADSAAAAAAAAANIAAAAAAAAA0gAAAAAAAADSAAAAAAAAANIAAAAA AAAAOgQAAAIAAAA8BAAAAAAAADwEAAAAAAAAPAQAADsAAAB3BAAAtAEAACsGAAC0AQAA3wcAACQA AADOCAAA9AEAAMIKAAAMAQAAAwgAABUAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAkgAAAAAAAADSAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAADSAAAAAAAAANIAAAAAAAAA0gAAAAAAAADSAAAAAAAAAAMIAAAAAAAA fgIAAAAAAACSAAAAAAAAAJIAAAAAAAAA0gAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANIAAAAAAAAA0gAAAAAAAAB+ AgAAAAAAAH4CAAAAAAAAfgIAAAAAAADSAAAA4gAAAJIAAAAAAAAA0gAAAAAAAACSAAAAAAAAANIA AAAAAAAAOgQAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAApgAAAAAAAACmAAAAAAAAAJIAAAAAAAAAkgAA AAAAAACSAAAAAAAAAJIAAAAAAAAA0gAAAAAAAAA6BAAAAAAAAH4CAAC8AQAAfgIAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAADoEAAAAAAAAkgAAAAAAAACSAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAOgQAAAAAAADSAAAAAAAAAMYAAAAMAAAAQNSN6Ej7 wAGmAAAAAAAAAKYAAAAAAAAAtAEAAMoAAAA6BAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgU1RSSU5HLUNJUkNMRSBQQVJU SUNMRVMgICAgIEYuSi4gU3BhcmJlciAgMDYvMjEvMDENDWVvID0gOC44NUUtMTIgZmFyYWQvbWV0 ZXIgICAgICANDXVvID0gNChwaSlFLTcgaGVucnkvbWV0ZXIgICAgIA0NU3RyaW5nLUNpcmNsZSBS YWRpdXMsIFIgPSBrcV4yL0UNDXEgPSBDViA9IDEuNjAyRS0xOSAgKENvdWxvbWJzKQ0NayA9IDEv NChwaSllbw0NRSA9IFN0cmluZy1DaXJjbGUgb3IgUXVhcmsgRW5lcmd5ICAoSm91bGVzKSA9IDAu NUNWXjIgPSAwLjVMSV4yID0gbWNeMiANDUMgPSAyKHBpKVIqZW8gICAgKCBmYXJhZCApICANDUwg PSAyKHBpKVIqdW8gICAgICAoaGVucnkpDQ1WID0gKDJFL0MpXjEvMiAgICAgKHZvbHRzKQ0NSSA9 ICgyRS9MKV4xLzIgICAgIChhbXBlcmVzKSANDWYgID0gZnJlcXVlbmN5ICAgKEh6KSA9IDEvKExD KV4xLzIgID0gIGMvMihwaSlSICAgPSAgSS9xDQ1aID0gKEwvQyleMS8yICA9IDM3NyBvaG1zDQ0g RmFjdG9yaW5nICAiQmlnIEciIGludG8gbWFnbmV0aWMgdW5pdHM6ICAgKDYuNjdFLTExLzEuMEUt NyleMS8yID0gMC4wMjU4MyBBbXBlcmUtTWV0ZXJzL0tnDQ1Gb3IgdGhlIGVsZWN0cm9uOiAgOS4x RS0zMSBLZyowLjAyNTgzID0gMi4zNUUtMzIgQW1wZXJlLU1ldGVycywgYnV0IHRoaXMgaXMgZHVl IHRvIGEgcmVsYXRpdmlzdGljIGFjY2VsZXJhdGVkIGZyYW1lIHRpbWUgZGlsYXRpb24gaWUuLCB0 aGUgY2lyY2xpbmcgY2hhcmdlIGlzIGNvbnN0YW50bHkgYWNjZWxlcmF0aW5nIGR1ZSB0byBjaGFu Z2Ugb2YgZGlyZWN0aW9uIHdoaWNoIGNhdXNlcyBpdCdzIGNsb2NrIHRvIHNsb3cgZG93bi4gVGh1 cyB0aGUgZGlsYXRpb24gaXMgNC44RS0xMSBhbXBlcmUtbWV0ZXJzLzIuMzVFLTMyIGFtcGVyZS1t ZXRlcnMgPSAyLjBFMjENDVRoZSBncmF2aXRhdGlvbmFsIGZvcmNlIGJldHdlZW4gdHdvIGVsZWN0 cm9ucyBhdCAxLjAgbWV0ZXIgc2VwYXJhdGlvbjogDQ1GZyA9IDYuNjdFLTExKiA5LjFFLTMxXjIv MV4yID0gNS41MkUtNzEgbnQNDU9yIGluIE1hZ25ldG9ncmF2aXR5IHRlcm1zOg0NRGlsYXRlZDog IDEuMEUtNyogKDAuMDI1ODMqOS4xRS0zMSleMi8xXjIgPSA1LjUyRS03MSBudA0NVW5kaWxhdGVk OiAxLjBFLTcqICg0LjhFLTExKV4yLzFeMiA9IDIuMzA0RS0yOCBudCAgc2hvd2luZyB0aGUgMi4w RTIxIHRpbWUgZGlsYXRpb24gaW4gZWFjaCBlbGVjdHJvbi4NDU5vdGUgdGhhdCB0aGUgMi4zMDRF LTI4IG50ICBhdHRyYWN0aXZlIG1hZ25ldGljIGZvcmNlIGlzIHRoZSBzYW1lIGFzIHRoZSAyLjMw NEUtMjggbnQgcmVwdWxzaXZlIGVsZWN0cm9zdGF0aWMgZm9yY2UgYmV0d2VlbiB0d28gY2hhcmdl cyBxIGF0IDEuMCBtZXRlciBzZXBhcmF0aW9uIGllLiwgRmVzID0ga3FeMi9yXjIgPSAyLjMwNEUt MjggbnQhDQ1Gb3IgYSBRdWFyayBvciBTdHJpbmctQ2lyY2xlOiB+NS41M0UtMjggS2cgKiAwLjAy NTgzID0gMS40M0UtMjkgQW1wZXJlLU1ldGVycywgdGhlIHRpbWUgZGlsYXRpb24NaXMgNC44RS0x MS8xLjQzRS0yOSA9IDMuMzVFMTguDQ1TaW5jZSBmIGZvciBhIHN0cmluZyBjaXJjbGUgaXMgMS4w NEUyNSBIeiwgdGhlIGRpbGF0ZWQgb3IgZ3Jhdml0YXRpb25hbCBmcmVxdWVuY3kgaXMgfjMuMSBN SHouDQ1JZiAgdGhlIHBoYXNlIHZlbG9jaXR5ICgxMzcqYykgZGV0ZXJtaW5lcyBmLCB0aGVuIHRo ZSBncmF2aXRhdGlvbmFsIGZyZXF1ZW5jeSBpcyB+NDI0IE1Iei4NDQ0AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABAAADgkA ABYJAADaCgAAAP0AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAM2CIEAAwAEAABdBAAA XgQAAH4EAAB/BAAAngQAAJ8EAADABAAAwQQAAOAEAADhBAAA7wQAAPAEAAA4BQAAOQUAAFYFAABX BQAAcgUAAHMFAACOBQAAjwUAAK0FAACuBQAA5wUAAOgFAAACBgAAAwYAAF8GAABgBgAAogcAAP0A AAAAAAAAAAAAAAD9AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA/QAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAP0AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAD9AAAAAAAA AAAAAAAA/QAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAP0AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAD9AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA/QAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AP0AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAD9AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA/QAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAP0AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAD9AAAA AAAAAAAAAAAA/QAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAP0AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAD9AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA/QAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAP0AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAD9AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA/QAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAP0AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAD9 AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA/QAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAP0AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAD9AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA/QAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAP0AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAD9AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAEAAAAdAAQAAF0EAABe BAAAfgQAAH8EAACeBAAAnwQAAMAEAADBBAAA4AQAAOEEAADvBAAA8AQAADgFAAA5BQAAVgUAAFcF AAByBQAAcwUAAI4FAACPBQAArQUAAK4FAADnBQAA6AUAAAIGAAADBgAAXwYAAGAGAACiBwAAowcA AOsHAADsBwAAFwgAABgIAAA0CAAANQgAAG0IAABuCAAA1AgAANUIAACbCQAAnAkAAP0JAAAcCgAA HQoAAHwKAAB9CgAA2AoAANkKAADaCgAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAADKiBwAAowcAAOsH AADsBwAAFwgAABgIAAA0CAAANQgAAG0IAABuCAAA1AgAANUIAACbCQAAnAkAAP0JAAAcCgAAHQoA AHwKAAB9CgAA2AoAANkKAADaCgAA/QAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAP0AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAD9AAAAAAAAAAAA AAAA/QAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAP0AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAD9AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA/QAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAP0A AAAAAAAAAAAAAAD9AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA/QAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAP0AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAD9AAAAAAAA AAAAAAAA/QAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAP0AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAD9AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA/QAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AP0AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAD9AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA/QAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAP0AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAD9AAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABAAAAFRwAH7DQLyCw4D0h sAgHIrAIByOQoAUkkKAFJbAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAEgAPAAoAAQBbAA8A AgAAAAAAAAAkAABA8f8CACQAAAAGAE4AbwByAG0AYQBsAAAAAgAAAAQAbUgJBAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAADwAQUDy/6EAPAAAABYARABlAGYAYQB1AGwAdAAgAFAAYQByAGEAZwByAGEAcABoACAA RgBvAG4AdAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA2gYAAAUAABQAAAYA/////wAEAADaCgAABgAAAAAEAACi BwAA2goAAAcAAAAJAAAAAAQAANoKAAAIAAAAAAAAAEsAAABSAAAAXgAAAGAAAAB/AAAAgQAAAOwA AADuAAAAQgEAAEYBAABgAQAAZAEAAOICAADkAgAA7AMAAO4DAAAUBAAAFgQAAB4EAAAsBAAAagQA AGwEAABuBAAAdwQAAJ0EAACfBAAA7QQAAO8EAAAoBQAAKgUAAHcFAAB5BQAAfAUAAH8FAACXBQAA mQUAANwGAAAHABwABwAcAAcAHAAHABwABwAcAAcAHAAHABwABwAcAAcAHAAHABwABwAcAAcAHAAH ABwABwAcAAcAHAAHABwABwAcAAcAHAAHAAAAAAA4AAAASQAAAF4AAABgAAAAfwAAAIEAAADBAAAA wgAAAOEAAADiAAAAQQEAAEMBAABfAQAAYQEAAK4BAACvAQAAcAIAAHcCAADVAwAA3QMAABQEAAAW BAAAagQAAGwEAACdBAAAqAQAAO0EAAD7BAAA/QUAAP8FAAB9BgAAhAYAANwGAAAHABoABwAaAAcA GgAHABoABwAaAAcAGgAHABoABwAaAAcAGgAHABoABwAaAAcAGgAHABoABwAaAAcAGgAHABoABwD/ /wYAAAAVAFYAYQBsAHUAZQBkACAARwBhAHQAZQB3AGEAeQAgAEMAbABpAGUAbgB0AEAAQwA6AFwA VwBJAE4ARABPAFcAUwBcAFQARQBNAFAAXABBAHUAdABvAFIAZQBjAG8AdgBlAHIAeQAgAHMAYQB2 AGUAIABvAGYAIABTAHQAcgBpAG4AZwAtAEMAaQByAGMAbABlACAAUABhAHIAdABpAGMAbABlAHMA LgBhAHMAZAAVAFYAYQBsAHUAZQBkACAARwBhAHQAZQB3AGEAeQAgAEMAbABpAGUAbgB0ACsAQwA6 AFwATQB5ACAARABvAGMAdQBtAGUAbgB0AHMAXABTAHQAcgBpAG4AZwAtAEMAaQByAGMAbABlACAA UABhAHIAdABpAGMAbABlAHMALgBkAG8AYwAVAFYAYQBsAHUAZQBkACAARwBhAHQAZQB3AGEAeQAg AEMAbABpAGUAbgB0ACsAQwA6AFwATQB5ACAARABvAGMAdQBtAGUAbgB0AHMAXABTAHQAcgBpAG4A ZwAtAEMAaQByAGMAbABlACAAUABhAHIAdABpAGMAbABlAHMALgBkAG8AYwD/QEhQIE9mZmljZUpl dCBSIFNlcmllcwBMUFQxOgBIUE1ESkNXQQBIUCBPZmZpY2VKZXQgUiBTZXJpZXMASFAgT2ZmaWNl SmV0IFIgU2VyaWVzAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABDwDlAAgAQP/gAcBAAEAAAAAAGQAAQABACwBAgABACwB AQAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAEAAAADAAAAAQAAAAEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAEhQIE9mZmljZUpldCBSIFNlcmllcwAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABMUFQxAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAEAAQAAAAAAAADk DPYJAQAAAAAAAgABAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA LAEsAQEAAQAAAAEAAQABAAEAAQABAAAAZAABAEhQIE9mZmljZUpldCBSIFNlcmllcwAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAQ8A5QAIAED/4AHAQABAAAAAABkAAEAAQAsAQIAAQAsAQEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABAAAAAwAAAAEAAAABAAAAAAAA AAAAAABIUCBPZmZpY2VKZXQgUiBTZXJpZXMAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAATFBUMQAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABAAEAAAAAAAAA5Az2CQEAAAAAAAIAAQAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACwBLAEBAAEAAAABAAEAAQABAAEA AQAAAGQAAQADgAEAbAQAAGwEAABU3WQAOwE7AWwEAAAAAAAAbAQAAAAAAAACEAAAAAAAAADaBgAA UAAACABAAAADAAAARxaQAQAAAgIGAwUEBQIDBIc6AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAD/AAAAAAAAAFQAaQBt AGUAcwAgAE4AZQB3ACAAUgBvAG0AYQBuAAAANRaQAQIABQUBAgEHBgIFBwAAAAAAAAAQAAAAAAAA AAAAAACAAAAAAFMAeQBtAGIAbwBsAAAAMyaQAQAAAgsGBAICAgICBIc6AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAD/ AAAAAAAAAEEAcgBpAGEAbAAAAAAABABBAAgAAADQAgAAAAAAAAAAWrNWplqzVqYAAAAAAgAAAAAA /QAAAKYFAAABAAIAAAAAAAAADAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAQABAAAAAQAAAAAAAAAkAwAAAIQAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAClBsAHtAC0AIAAMjAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAO8GAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAA//8SAAAAAAAAAEcAIAAgACAAIAAgACAAIAAgACAAIAAgACAAIAAgACAAIAAgACAAIAAg ACAAIAAgACAAIAAgACAAIAAgACAAIAAgACAAIAAgACAAIAAgACAAIAAgACAAUwBUAFIASQBOAEcA LQBDAEkAUgBDAEwARQAgAFAAQQBSAFQASQBDAEwARQBTACAAIAAgACAAIABGAAAAAAAAABUAVgBh AGwAdQBlAGQAIABHAGEAdABlAHcAYQB5ACAAQwBsAGkAZQBuAHQAFQBWAGEAbAB1AGUAZAAgAEcA YQB0AGUAdwBhAHkAIABDAGwAaQBlAG4AdAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAP7/AAAECgIAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAEAAADghZ/y+U9oEKuRCAArJ7PZMAAAALQBAAAQAAAAAQAAAIgAAAACAAAAkAAAAAMAAADg AAAABAAAAOwAAAAFAAAADAEAAAcAAAAYAQAACAAAACgBAAAJAAAASAEAABIAAABUAQAACgAAAHAB AAAMAAAAfAEAAA0AAACIAQAADgAAAJQBAAAPAAAAnAEAABAAAACkAQAAEwAAAKwBAAACAAAA5AQA AB4AAABIAAAAICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgU1RSSU5H LUNJUkNMRSBQQVJUSUNMRVMgICAgIEYAHgAAAAEAAAAAICAgHgAAABYAAABWYWx1ZWQgR2F0ZXdh eSBDbGllbnQAICAeAAAAAQAAAABhbHUeAAAABwAAAE5vcm1hbABHHgAAABYAAABWYWx1ZWQgR2F0 ZXdheSBDbGllbnQAICAeAAAAAgAAADIAbHUeAAAAEwAAAE1pY3Jvc29mdCBXb3JkIDguMABuQAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAQAAAAAAsT8lI+8ABQAAAAAAsT8lI+8ABAwAAAAEAAAADAAAA/QAAAAMAAACmBQAA AwAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAD+/wAABAoCAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACAAAA AtXN1ZwuGxCTlwgAKyz5rkQAAAAF1c3VnC4bEJOXCAArLPmueAEAADQBAAAMAAAAAQAAAGgAAAAP AAAAcAAAAAUAAACAAAAABgAAAIgAAAARAAAAkAAAABcAAACYAAAACwAAAKAAAAAQAAAAqAAAABMA AACwAAAAFgAAALgAAAANAAAAwAAAAAwAAAAUAQAAAgAAAOQEAAAeAAAACAAAAEdhdGV3YXkAAwAA AAwAAAADAAAAAgAAAAMAAADvBgAAAwAAAGoQCAALAAAAAAAAAAsAAAAAAAAACwAAAAAAAAALAAAA AAAAAB4QAAABAAAASAAAACAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg IFNUUklORy1DSVJDTEUgUEFSVElDTEVTICAgICBGAAwQAAACAAAAHgAAAAYAAABUaXRsZQADAAAA AQAAAAAAmAAAAAMAAAAAAAAAIAAAAAEAAAA2AAAAAgAAAD4AAAABAAAAAgAAAAoAAABfUElEX0dV SUQAAgAAAOQEAABBAAAATgAAAHsANQA1AEYAOABCAEYAQQAyAC0ANgA2AEEANQAtADEAMQBEADUA LQBBADkAOQA4AC0AQwA5ADUANgBFADYAMAA1ADYANgAyAEQAfQAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAQAAAAIAAAADAAAABAAAAAUAAAAGAAAABwAAAAgAAAAJAAAA CgAAAP7///8MAAAADQAAAA4AAAAPAAAAEAAAABEAAAASAAAA/v///xQAAAAVAAAAFgAAABcAAAAY AAAAGQAAABoAAAD+////HAAAAB0AAAAeAAAAHwAAACAAAAAhAAAAIgAAAP7////9////JQAAAP7/ ///+/////v////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// //////////////////////////9SAG8AbwB0ACAARQBuAHQAcgB5AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAFgAFAf//////////AwAAAAYJAgAAAAAAwAAAAAAA AEYAAAAAYExQ3NL6wAEgnZ7oSPvAAScAAACAAAAAAAAAADEAVABhAGIAbABlAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAOAAIA//////////////// AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACwAAAAAQAAAAAAAAVwBvAHIAZABE AG8AYwB1AG0AZQBuAHQAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABoA AgEFAAAA//////////8AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHhQA AAAAAAAFAFMAdQBtAG0AYQByAHkASQBuAGYAbwByAG0AYQB0AGkAbwBuAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAKAACAQIAAAAEAAAA/////wAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAABMAAAAAEAAAAAAAAAUARABvAGMAdQBtAGUAbgB0AFMAdQBtAG0AYQByAHkASQBuAGYA bwByAG0AYQB0AGkAbwBuAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA4AAIB////////////////AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGwAAAAAQAAAAAAAAAQBDAG8AbQBwAE8AYgBqAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABIAAgEBAAAABgAAAP////8A AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAagAAAAAAAABPAGIAagBlAGMA dABQAG8AbwBsAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAFgAB AP///////////////wAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAIJ2e6Ej7wAEgnZ7oSPvAAQAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA////////////////AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAQAAAP7///////////////////////////////////////////// //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// //////////////////////8BAP7/AwoAAP////8GCQIAAAAAAMAAAAAAAABGGAAAAE1pY3Jvc29m dCBXb3JkIERvY3VtZW50AAoAAABNU1dvcmREb2MAEAAAAFdvcmQuRG9jdW1lbnQuOAD0ObJxAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA== ------=_NextPart_000_019B_01C0FE29.B07BEE00-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 26 11:17:51 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id LAA12721; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 11:17:09 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 11:17:09 -0700 Message-ID: <002801c0fe61$95c878c0$a7181ad8 oemcomputer> From: "Bruce Meland" To: Cc: "John Bryan" , , Subject: Fw: Bush Privatizes UFO Information to "NIDS" Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 10:00:36 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Resent-Message-ID: <"bclvm2.0.J63.X6DEx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43379 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: -----Original Message----- From: Patrick Bailey To: BCC: UFO_Send_List Date: Monday, June 25, 2001 5:34 PM Subject: FWD: Bush Privatizes UFO Information to "NIDS" FWD: Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 11:11:47 -0700 From: drboylan X-Accept-Language: en,es-MX To: ufotruth , drrichboylanreports Subject: Bush Privatizes UFO Informatio to "NIDS" X-Rcpt-To: pgb padrak.com Bush Privatizes UFO Information To "NIDS" by Richard Boylan, Ph.D. My comments in full on the news release below would be unprintable. You may have read my recent article on NIDS. (Reprinted below "news release" below.) The fact that NIDS gets a foot in the door with FAA under the Bush-Cheney Administration is prima-facie evidence that "W" is a patsy, whether "witting" or unwittingly, of Cabal assets. Bush has taken Republican "privatization" initiatives to new heights (or depths) by trying to "privatize" the UFO/ET contact phenomenon! As if!! Of course, he is only doing in a more public fashion what the Cabal has been doing for five decades -- treating UFO/ET information, captured ET vehicles and individuals, and technology as private corporate property (sic). It looks like George W. will take us from the UFO Cover-Up to UFO-Privatization without ever going through the step of UFO Public Disclosure. Thus goes participatory democracy under President Bush II. - Richard Boylan, Ph.D. xxxxxxxxxx (thanks to Paola Harris for forwarding the news release below)_ > >NIDS Becomes Only Official Organization to Receive UFO Reports from the > >Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) > > > >NIDS is pleased to announce that the newly printed Federation Aviation > >Administration (FAA) manuals indicate the National Institute for Discovery > >Science (NIDS) as the sole contact point in the United States to which the > >FAA reports UFOs. > > > >The following four FAA Manuals contain the changes: > >FAA Order 7110.65, Air Traffic Control > >FAA Order 7210.3, Facility Operation and Administration > >Aeronautical Information Manual (AIM) > >Aeronautical Information Publication (AIP) > > > >The FAA wording of the order mandating the changes is as follows: “In > >calendar year 1999, representatives from the National Institute for > >Discovery Sciences (NIDS) contacted the FAA Administrator to offer their > >research institution as the single point of contact recognized by the FAA > >in regard to UFO information. On April 14, 2000, after being referred by > >the FAA Administrator, NIDS representatives met with ATP-200 to finalize a > >course of action. This document change proposal is a result of that > >meeting and is official FAA recognition that NIDS is the single point of contact for UFO research.” > > > >The official date for all FAA offices to receive the new manuals is July > >12, 2001, but NIDS has confirmed that many FAA offices have already > >received the manuals. ++++++++++ A reply from Dr. Richard Boylan: NIDS, the so-called "National Institute For Discovery Science", is made to sound like some public-purpose academic organization. In actuality, it is the rivate holding of shadowy billionaire Robert Bigelow, a Las Vegas casinos operator who is closely allied with rogue military-intelligence psy/psi-warfare officers suspected of being part of the renegade UFO Cover-Up Cabal. Bigelow uses his billions to buy certain scientists who have worked in classified ET-tech projects. Then he gets them to work for him, ferreting out data about things like ET craft technology and dimensional portals. Most of what his stable of scientists learn is kept private by Bigelow. He orders a few crumbs of information to be thrown out to the public from time to time to keep up the illusion that NIDS is a public-service enterprise. Nothing could be farther from the truth. The Cabal wants ET technology, and the wealth and power which come from possessing it, all to themselves. Richard Boylan, Ph.D. Richard J. Boylan, Ph.D., CCHT, LLC Post Office Box 22310, Sacramento, CA 95822, USA. (916) 422-7479 E-mail: drboylan jps.net URL: www.jps.net/drboylan You are invited to join his informational reports and conversations on-line list, UFOTruth by going to http://UFOTruth.listbot.com and clicking on the Subscribe button and following directions. You may instead wish to join his personal reports-only list (no conversations), DrRichBoylanReports by subscribing at: http://DrRichBoylanReports.listbot.com Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii; name="drboylan.vcf" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Description: Card for drboylan Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="drboylan.vcf" From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 26 12:53:37 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id MAA20890; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 12:52:01 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 12:52:01 -0700 Message-ID: <3B38E833.A74724BE bellsouth.net> Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 15:53:23 -0400 From: Terry Blanton X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Chinese Foucault's Pendulum Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"JCe8E3.0.I65.XVEEx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43380 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: China measures gravity anomaly during eclipse: http://www.spacedaily.com/news/china-01zi.html From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 26 13:03:42 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id NAA24711; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 13:02:08 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 13:02:08 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: rick mail.highsurf.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <3B388375.AD0C3827 bellsouth.net> References: <001501c0fdad$3c280880$c9181ad8 oemcomputer> <3B388375.AD0C3827@bellsouth.net> Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 09:57:32 -1000 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Rick Monteverde Subject: Re: Dr. Chung's Negative Resistance Replicated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Resent-Message-ID: <"IJyOi.0.126.0fEEx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43381 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Yes, fell on my face trying to make funny. I imagined someone writing that in 1840 or so, before Faraday figured it all out. No need to rub it in! Also note the hedge - no "usable" amounts. Even if I got a level rollaway, I don't know what I'd use it for. - Rick >Rick Monteverde wrote: > >> There is not and there will NEVER be any device that will produce >> usable amounts of electricity from any form of magnetism! > >But, Rick, *all* rotating generators use magnetism! See, you >have this thing called a field coil . . . > >Terry > >hee, hee From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 26 13:23:15 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id NAA00328; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 13:22:46 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 13:22:46 -0700 X-Originating-IP: [64.19.14.115] From: "Adam Cox" To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Chinese Foucault's Pendulum Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 15:22:10 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Jun 2001 20:22:10.0603 (UTC) FILETIME=[ADC3C7B0:01C0FE7D] Resent-Message-ID: <"7mAVa.0.x4.LyEEx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43382 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: With the gravitational attraction of the moon added to that of the sun, one would expect that objects would appear to weigh slightly less during the eclipse, not from shielding effects but simply from the opposing forces. a truly interesting experiment would be to take similar measurements on the opposite side of the earth from the total eclipse. Merlyn _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 26 13:36:48 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id NAA07527; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 13:35:56 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 13:35:56 -0700 Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20010626163123.00a932c0 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 16:35:49 -0400 To: vortex-l eskimo.com, vortex-l@eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: Re: Chinese Foucault's Pendulum In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <"fZqZ8.0.Xr1.i8FEx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43383 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Adam Cox wrote: >With the gravitational attraction of the moon added to that of the sun, >one would expect that objects would appear to weigh slightly less during >the eclipse, not from shielding effects but simply from the opposing forces. Surely the Chinese and the APS Physics Review D editors know that! I assume they took that into account and observed an additional anomaly. > a truly interesting experiment would be to take similar measurements on > the opposite side of the earth from the total eclipse. Perhaps, but then again maybe the mass of the earth would interfere. Perhaps you have to compare a place where the sun is normally, where it is screened, and it reappears soon after. At the opposite side of the earth the sun is always screened by a much larger body than the moon. - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 26 13:46:13 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id NAA11426; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 13:45:40 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 13:45:40 -0700 Message-ID: <008401c0fe76$599aff20$a7181ad8 oemcomputer> From: "Bruce Meland" To: Cc: "John Bryan" Subject: Re: Toyota announces progress in hybrid vehicles Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 12:28:29 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Resent-Message-ID: <"7-8G-1.0.Ro2.qHFEx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43385 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: The THS-C hybrid system, similar to THS-M was introduced at EVS-17 in Montreal that I and a few reporters and photographers from Electrifying Times attended. It is called the Post-Prius hybrid system for larger vehicles such as mini vans. It has a essentially a Prius type drive train in the front with a CVT and a rear electric motor drive system which eliminates a drive shaft to the rear wheels. All motors are computer connected. In a few years, when they get the bugs out of it, it will be introduced to the US. Last weekend Toyota flew me to Hebron KY for the launch of the worlds first AC Drive electric fork lift(they call them trucks in the handling industry). It has worlds first regenerative breaking system which puts electricity back into the batteries when breaking, decellerating and switching from forward to reverse or reverse to forward. Toyota just launched the worlds first hybrid fuel cell vehicle in Japan, in the Toyota Highlander (new mid size SUV). Details will be on our web site soon as Electrifying Times will be first to reveal the fuel cell technology here in the US. Toyota's fuel cell systems run on methanol with a onboard reformer that converts methanol to hydrogen, thus eliminates costly onboard high pressure tanks required for liquid hdrogen and costly hydrogen storage infrastructure at service stations. Methanol storage tanks an service stations is no problem. Bruce -----Original Message----- From: Jed Rothwell To: vortex-L eskimo.com Date: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 12:22 PM Subject: Toyota announces progress in hybrid vehicles >The Yomiuri newspaper reports that Toyota is pleased with the sales of the >Prius hybrid automobile, which have reached 50,000 in Japan and 10,000 >overseas. Toyota plans to expand production of hybrid vehicles to 300,000 >per year by 2004. It announced two other initiatives > >The Estima Hybrid minivan. This car will seek seven passengers and features >four-wheel electric drive with regenerator breaking. It gets 18 km/l of >gasoline (42 mpg), with a range of 1000 km per tank. NOx and other >pollution is 75% below the 2000 standards. The car has a 1500 watt 100V AC >outlet, intended for people who want to use computers or hairdryers on the >road, but I imagine it would also be good to have during power outages. >(Power outages are much rarer in Japan than Atlanta.) > >A so-called "mild hybrid engine" compatible with existing engines. It is >described as a "simple, easy-to-adapt hybrid system called THS-M (Toyota >Hybrid System-Mild)." It reduces fuel consumption 15%, and reduces >emissions to 50 percent below 2000 standards. The battery and electric >motor accelerate from a standing stop to low speeds, when ICE are least >effective. The electric motor acts as a generator, recharging the battery >during deceleration, breaking and idling. It will be available as an option >on many of Toyota's existing product line by the end of this year. > >These products will only be available in Japan for the time being. > >Honda announced that it sold 573 Insight hybrid electric vehicles in April >2001. This compares with 34,044 Accords, their best-selling model. They >have sold a total of 5419 Insights in the U.S. Worldwide sales are not >available. Honda says it is losing money on each sale, but within a few >years it expects to ramp sales up to 10,000 units per year and it will >begin to clear a profit. Honda announced it will begin selling a hybrid >version of the Civic in Japan in 2001, and in North America and Europe in >2002. Comparing the Insight to the Toyota prius, driver reviews in the >trade magazines and newspapers say the Prius is more like a standard >automobile and has better performance. > >No U.S. or European automaker has demonstrated or announced a production >hybrid vehicle. The Administration's National Energy Policy mentions them >once"create an income tax credit for the purchase of hybrid and fuel cell >vehicles to promote fuel-efficient vehicles." As things now stand, this >would be a subsidy for Toyota and Honda. In a few years, the Japanese >manufacturers will be far ahead on the learning curve, and they will be >selling standard models with a hybrid engine option, at a profit. > >Sources: > >Yomiuri newspaper > >http://pressroom.toyota.com/ > >http://www.toyota.com/html/about/news/archive/press_release/environment/doc s/2001/20010615_estima.jsp > >http://www.insightcentral.net/sales.html > > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 26 13:46:33 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id NAA11391; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 13:45:37 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 13:45:37 -0700 Message-ID: <008301c0fe76$578b0ae0$a7181ad8 oemcomputer> From: "Bruce Meland" To: "John Bryan" Cc: Subject: Re: Fighting with Tom! Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 11:55:44 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Resent-Message-ID: <"CRDrn3.0.pn2.mHFEx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43384 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Hi John Tell Tom just because he did a search on the internet is no reason to believe that viable neutrino battery type technology does not exist. I know for a fact it does and will be forwarding some more info to Vortex, that is, what i am allowed to publish about the devices. Actually it is not a convential battery, just a device that entrains neutrinos and perhaps other electro-magnetic particles or waves coming from the sun, cosmos, earths magnetic field. The devices range from perhaps switching devices tuned to frequencies higher than light, counter rotating disks that entrain high frequenciey particles and waves and convert them to electricity. Stay tuned, at very high frequencies, that is. Bruce -----Original Message----- From: John Bryan To: bruce meland Date: Monday, June 25, 2001 6:48 PM Subject: Fighting with Tom! >Hi Bruce! > >Tom said: > >i just did a search and all i found on the neutrino battery >was that it's essentially a dead issue at the moment. >maybe there's some "new news" but i didn't come across >any. > >see link below for something similar: >http://www.rqm.ch/engl/inhalt.htm > >your comment about acceleration and top speed is agreed >since i have worked at reliance electric athens, ga. >(the world's largest electric motor plant) and an electric >motor would pull the shorts off you if you could supply >enough juice. but lead-acid just wouldn't cut it no matter >what control circuitry they tried. and the environmentalists >would wind up screaming bloody murder about all the extra >"killer lead" being incorporated. so from a strictly power-plant >perspective, electric would be fine, even if most folks don't >currently realize it, but the terciaries.... > >i suppose if you keep your daily range (demands) way down >your vehicle works but you won't be taking a 3000 mi vacation >with 4 kids, a wife and luggage in it. so if you "live within the >(reasonable) operating parameters of the vehicle" you're ok. >and right now, those parameters just don't cut it. if they did, >people would be in mob gear clamoring for these vehicles, >and they aren't. > >also, since it takes electricity which needs to be generated >somewhere to charge it, that must go into the equation also >as i stated. going solar for your particular use might be fine >but for the average user, forget it. it would be easier to sell >ice to an eskimo. most people can talk the talk but i notice >that babs "everyone hang your clothes outside to dry and turn >off everything electric" streisand has yet to be spotted within >500 yards of a clothespin. and society is 99 and 44/100ths >percent babs at heart. that's reality. > >so i'll just stick to my original point that there's a real long >way to go before achieving a marketable substitute vehicle >and i just don't realistically see it coming out of any present >technological scheme. i believe at this point that it must come >from something entirely new (as yet undiscovered). > >best regards > >ps- i boldly predict that your vehicle has no heat or air >conditioning, radio, etc. >am i wrong? (you get the picture) >-we're up against some heavy demands. > > > > > > > > > and I replied: > > >Hi Tom, > >> but lead-acid just wouldn't cut it no matter >> what control circuitry they tried. > > There's a group of us that drag race electric cars >http://www.nedra.com >I've shot video of Dodge Vipers and even super built muscle cars >getting blown away by electrics. The EVs are all are running >lead acid and high powered silicon based controllers. > >> and the environmentalists would wind up screaming bloody murder >> about all the extra "killer lead" being incorporated. > > They are just believing the propaganda being circulated >by the auto/oil industry. Lead acid batteries are a recycling >success story. I think they may actually be the most recycled item >in our society. > >> i suppose if you keep your daily range (demands) way down >> your vehicle works but you won't be taking a 3000 mi vacation >> with 4 kids, a wife and luggage in it. > > That's my point, the trip you describe is not a daily >range demand, at least for most people. I'll boldly predict >that you didn't drive that far today. ;^) > >> so if you "live within the >> (reasonable) operating parameters of the vehicle" you're ok. > > Not many people know the range of their gas car, because >when it gets low they just stop at the next gas station. To be >fair to electrics in this comparison, you would have to make the >refueling available for them too. What would be the reasonable >operating parameters for a gas car if their were no gas stations >except at home? > >> also, since it takes electricity which needs to be generated >> somewhere to charge it, that must go into the equation also >> as i stated. > > If an SUV were to belly up to a power plant and supply >the gas, it could run my car a very very long way. This EV is >so efficient that after driving across town the motor heats up >maybe 5 degrees and the controller about 2. This is all thanks >to running high voltages and low current. > >> and society is 99 and 44/100ths >> percent babs at heart. that's reality. > > I couldn't agree with you more. > >> ps- i boldly predict that your vehicle has no heat or air >> conditioning, radio, etc. >> am i wrong? (you get the picture) >> -we're up against some heavy demands. > > I'm glad you predicted that. It all flows with what the general >public thinks about EVs. I have a very powerful electric heater that >runs at pack voltage (192 Volts), it provides instant heat (no waiting >for an engine to warm up) and uses so little current at that voltage that >it's power use is insignificant. My car didn't have air originally and >doesn't have it now, but it could be added. Many EVs have air conditioning. >Radio? I put in a very high powered stereo that blows most people away. > > The general public seems to actually believe all these things that >you've mentioned, which is why I built an EV that breaks all the rules. >I know where you're coming from, I hear this stuff all the time. If you >could ride in some of the new state of the art EVs and maybe attend our >next drag race, it could very likely make a positive impression on you. > >...John > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 26 14:16:49 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id OAA24234; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 14:16:04 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 14:16:04 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Sender: mjones pop.jump.net Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <002801c0fe61$95c878c0$a7181ad8 oemcomputer> Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 16:13:04 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Mitchell Jones Subject: Re: Fw: Bush Privatizes UFO Information to "NIDS" Resent-Message-ID: <"9kKnQ.0.Xw5.IkFEx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43386 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: [snip] > NIDS, the so-called "National Institute For Discovery >Science" ***{This is the outfit that, upon receiving a supposed "extraterrestrial object"--i.e., a varistor that was popped off of a power line by a lightning strike--immediately sent it to Earth Tech (Scott Little's organization) for analysis. See http://www.nidsci.org/news/varistor.pdf. --MJ}*** , is made to sound like some public-purpose academic >organization. In actuality, it is the rivate holding of >shadowy billionaire Robert Bigelow, a Las Vegas casinos >operator who is closely allied with rogue >military-intelligence psy/psi-warfare officers suspected of >being part of the renegade UFO Cover-Up Cabal. ***{The implication: Robert Bigelow is probably the "deep pockets" investor behind Earth Tech. --MJ}*** > Bigelow uses his billions to buy certain scientists >who have worked in classified ET-tech projects. ***{Hal Puthoff, perhaps? --MJ}*** Then he gets >them to work for him, ferreting out data about things like ET >craft technology and dimensional portals. > Most of what his stable of scientists learn is kept >private by Bigelow. He orders a few crumbs of information to >be thrown out to the public from time to time to keep up the >illusion that NIDS is a public-service enterprise. Nothing >could be farther from the truth. > The Cabal wants ET technology, and the wealth and >power which come from possessing it, all to themselves. > > Richard Boylan, Ph.D. ***{Perhaps we should begin placing somewhat less weight on Scott Little's negative CF results than we have in the past--myself included. --MJ}*** ________________ Quote of the month: "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value--i.e., zero." --Voltaire From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 26 15:35:33 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id PAA05911; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 15:34:57 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 15:34:57 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: rick mail.highsurf.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 12:25:40 -1000 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Rick Monteverde Subject: Re: Fw: Bush Privatizes UFO Information to "NIDS" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Resent-Message-ID: <"o1SLl1.0.CS1.GuGEx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43387 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: LOL - Scott-the-MIB. He'll have to order a can of that spray stuff from TV infomercial guru Ron Popiel so he can paint his beard black! Come to think of it, that thing's probably approaching ZZTop mass by now, so better order two cans. - Rick Monteverde Honolulu, HI >***{Perhaps we should begin placing somewhat less weight on Scott Little's >negative CF results than we have in the past--myself included. --MJ}*** >________________ >Quote of the month: > >"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value--i.e., zero." >--Voltaire From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 26 20:19:44 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx2.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id UAA01932; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 20:18:21 -0700 (PDT) Resent-Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 20:18:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Apparently-From: Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.20010626222009.009b72b0 postoffice.swbell.net> X-Sender: cjford1 pop.mail.yahoo.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58 Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 22:21:42 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Charles Ford Subject: Re: Dr. Chung's Negative Resistance Replicated In-Reply-To: References: <001501c0fdad$3c280880$c9181ad8 oemcomputer> <001501c0fdad$3c280880$c9181ad8 oemcomputer> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <"RMo7k.0._T.w1LEx" mx2> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43388 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 12:23 PM 6/25/01 -1000, you wrote: >There is not and there will NEVER be any device that will produce usable >amounts of electricity from any form of magnetism! Anyone that says they >have one is just trying to sell you a free energy scam Rick: At least it is less vulgar then my goof up with "the B word" :-) Cheers Charlie Ford KC5-OWZ cjford1 yahoo.com cjford1 swbell.net _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 26 20:25:24 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx2.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id UAA02588; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 20:22:28 -0700 (PDT) Resent-Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 20:22:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Apparently-From: Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.20010626222328.0095b2b0 postoffice.swbell.net> X-Sender: cjford1 pop.mail.yahoo.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58 Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 22:25:42 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Charles Ford Subject: Re: Dr. Chung's Negative Resistance Replicated In-Reply-To: <3B37DF3B.EE8FA400 suite224.net> References: <001501c0fdad$3c280880$c9181ad8 oemcomputer> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <"MWZbd3.0.Ge.m5LEx" mx2> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43389 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 09:02 PM 6/25/01 -0400, Francis Stenger wrote: >Rick Monteverde wrote: > > > > There is not and there will NEVER be any device that will produce > > usable amounts of electricity from any form of magnetism! Anyone that > > says they have one is just trying to sell you a free energy scam. > >Spoken like a true graduate of the SMOT INSTITUTE OF MAGNETIC SCAMS, >Rick! > >Even now, however, it's sometimes hard to pass up a pile of ceramic >magnets without grabbing for my balls (steel, that is). :-) > >Frank Stenger Frank: I just finished telling Rick that at least this was less vulgar then my "B word" goof up. Now you have just made it a contender... :-) Charlie Ford KC5-OWZ cjford1 yahoo.com cjford1 swbell.net _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Jun 26 23:44:17 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx2.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id XAA18014; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 23:43:08 -0700 (PDT) Resent-Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 23:43:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3B39645B.B8C7415E suite224.net> Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 00:43:07 -0400 From: "Francis J. Stenger" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Win95; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Dr. Chung's Negative Resistance Replicated References: <001501c0fdad$3c280880$c9181ad8 oemcomputer> <4.2.0.58.20010626222328.0095b2b0@postoffice.swbell.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"0CgfE2.0.GP4.v1OEx" mx2> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43390 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Charles Ford wrote: > .... > Frank: > > I just finished telling Rick that at least this was less vulgar then my "B > word" goof up. Now you have just made it a contender... :-) Sorry, Charlie, my head is wheeling around like a scene from "Vertigo" as I try to adjust to Scott Little's tie-in to the "Dark Side"!! (((:-))) Frank Stenger From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Jun 27 00:17:53 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx2.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id AAA26638; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 00:16:55 -0700 (PDT) Resent-Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 00:16:55 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <008301c0fe76$578b0ae0$a7181ad8 oemcomputer> References: <008301c0fe76$578b0ae0$a7181ad8 oemcomputer> Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 02:15:39 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: thomas malloy Subject: neutrino energy source Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Resent-Message-ID: <"anxlo.0.7W6.cXOEx" mx2> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43391 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: > The devices range from perhaps switching devices >tuned to frequencies higher than light, counter rotating disks that entrain >high frequenciey particles and waves and convert them to electricity. Stay >tuned, at very high frequencies, that is. Bruce >--- > > But does it heat water? From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Jun 27 00:28:45 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx2.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id AAA28232; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 00:25:27 -0700 (PDT) Resent-Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 00:25:27 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <01062611414700.03429 linux> References: <01062611414700.03429@linux> Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 02:15:39 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: thomas malloy Subject: Re: The Green Nazis Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Resent-Message-ID: <"RbHgB.0.-u6.VfOEx" mx2> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43393 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: >the air for everyone to 'ingest'. Besides, what is wrong with 'paganism'? It depends on wether or not my paradigm is correct doesn't it? >Paganism stands for not anything really, or whatever is different from >YOUR particular trendy opiate of the masses, as Lenin would put it. That depends on wether Mitchell or I am correct about the existance of a creator G-d with a right to rule the Universe. >All those 'ism's' get in the way of understanding by forcing a two >dimensional view of the universe through a screen of pigeonholes. Progress, OMHO is made when you view the Universe through the "lense" of your particular paradigm. Based on that paradigm you either notice, or fail to notice things, aspects, which either conflict or are predicted by your pet paradigm. >Progress is not made that way. Classification of some things is fine. >Carried to extremes it progressively evolves into prejudice and >stigmatization based petty differences. As the Jews would say: > .........."Enough already!" OTOH, with out classification, there would be no science or understanding of the Universe > >Standing Bear >rockcast net-link.net > >We need not search the world for 'nutzies', they are all around us, >creating small boxes enabling dimwits to confuse understanding >with obfuscation and confusion. Hum, I think most the dimwits are watching daytime TV From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Jun 27 00:31:35 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx2.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id AAA28273; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 00:25:30 -0700 (PDT) Resent-Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 00:25:30 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <002801c0fe61$95c878c0$a7181ad8 oemcomputer> References: <002801c0fe61$95c878c0$a7181ad8 oemcomputer> Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 02:15:39 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: thomas malloy Subject: Re: Fw: Bush Privatizes UFO Information to "NIDS" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Resent-Message-ID: <"69SCP2.0.Pv6.afOEx" mx2> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43394 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Bruce Meland posted this. Thank you Bruce, I ignored this when Pat sent it to me. > > Bush Privatizes UFO Information To "NIDS" > by > Richard Boylan, Ph.D. > > > My comments in full on the news release below would be >unprintable. >You may have read my recent article on NIDS. (Reprinted below >"news release" below.) The fact that NIDS gets a foot in the >door with FAA under the Bush-Cheney Administration is >prima-facie evidence that "W" is a patsy, whether "witting" or >unwittingly, of Cabal assets. I agree > Bush has taken Republican "privatization" initiatives >to new >heights (or depths) by trying to "privatize" the UFO/ET >contact phenomenon! As if!! > > A reply from Dr. Richard Boylan: > > NIDS, the so-called "National Institute For Discovery >Science", is made to sound like some public-purpose academic >organization. In actuality, it is the rivate holding of >shadowy billionaire Robert Bigelow, a Las Vegas casinos >operator and real estate developer >who is closely allied with rogue >military-intelligence psy/psi-warfare officers suspected of >being part of the renegade UFO Cover-Up Cabal. When Robert was interviewed on the Art bell Program, I was quite impressed. He has a ranch where the "space brothers" have been putting appearances on a regular basis. He was talking about a video he has of one of them popping through a porthole. > Bigelow uses his billions to buy certain scientists >who have worked in classified ET-tech projects. Then he gets >them to work for him, ferreting out data about things like ET >craft technology and dimensional portals. I'd hate to write a grant attempting to get funding for me to study dimensional portals? I can hear the academics laughing at me already! > Most of what his stable of scientists learn is kept >private by Bigelow. One of whom is Hal Puthoff >He orders a few crumbs of information to >be thrown out to the public from time to time to keep up the >illusion that NIDS is a public-service enterprise. Nothing >could be farther from the truth. Given the obfuscation that has characterized the government's reporting, or rather the lack of it, I don't think that Robert could possibly do a worse job. > The Cabal wants ET technology, and the wealth and >power which come from possessing it, all to themselves. > > Richard Boylan, Ph.D. > > >Richard J. Boylan, Ph.D., CCHT, LLC Post Office Box >22310, Sacramento, CA 95822, USA. (916) 422-7479 >E-mail: drboylan jps.net URL: www.jps.net/drboylan From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Jun 27 00:32:32 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx2.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id AAA28213; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 00:25:25 -0700 (PDT) Resent-Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 00:25:25 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <001501c0fe6c$3d53d080$823f8aac default> References: <001501c0fe6c$3d53d080$823f8aac default> Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 02:15:39 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: thomas malloy Subject: Neutrino Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Resent-Message-ID: <"LaAoz2.0.Zu6.SfOEx" mx2> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43392 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: >temalloy metro.lakes.com > >Dear Mr. Thomas Malloy: >I just read a U.S. military manual in government >documents in Ashland Oregon Library, in 1997, which listed >U.S. military arrays of technical know how but it did list any >details. I photocopied a few page in manual in relation to laser >technologies which I was interested in at the time. OK >I just posted >some of the technologies off of the list at the vortex email list. I >am presently focusing my time on developing sound/aehter >force fields similar to Keely's force fields, since they require >very little power and few moving parts. have you visited Dale Pond's website at www.svpvril.com ? It is devoted to Keely >I do not presently have >the funds to research and produce such complex technologies >as subatomic nuclear accelerators or amplification techniques. >But I am interested in reading about the sub atomic >technologies, in case I ever come across the funds and >legitimate legal permission to develop such technologies. > >Respectively, > > >Thomas Clark >Email: tom rhfweb.com >Web site: www.rhfweb.com\personal From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Jun 27 00:32:53 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx2.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id AAA28301; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 00:25:38 -0700 (PDT) Resent-Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 00:25:38 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 02:15:39 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: thomas malloy Subject: Dr. Lindermann speaks! Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" ; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx2.eskimo.com id AAA28180 Resent-Message-ID: <"ZQLoU1.0.0w6.ifOEx" mx2> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43395 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Pat Bailey send this to me, I'm not going to hold my breath waiting for any of this to be commercially available, OTOH it might trigger a good thread. >X-Rcpt-To: pgb padrak.com > >:::>><<:::>><<:::>><<:::>><<:::>><<:::>><<::: > >EARTHCODE & INNER LIGHT NETWORK > >:::>><<:::>><<:::>><<:::>><<:::>><<:::>><<::: > >Hey Folks! More great news on free energy. It's more available than we >realize. As global consciousness shifts into states of greater liberation >in creativity, the world we live in reflects that state of consciousness. >Holding the vision for a bright future where everyone has what they need to >live happy, peaceful and fulfilling lives is the very process by which new >ideas, inventions and creations begin to manifest on earth. What we focus >our attention on, becomes greatly energized. In this way, each of us can >contribute to creating a future that serves the highest good for all. >Namaste' - Paula Peterson > > >:::>><<:::>><<:::>><<:::>><<:::>><<:::>><<::: > >THE WORLD OF FREE ENERGY > >By Peter Lindemann, D.Sc. > >:::>><<:::>><<:::>><<:::>><<:::>><<:::>><<::: > >In the late 1880's, trade journals in the electrical sciences were >predicting "free electricity" in the near future. Incredible discoveries >about the nature of electricity were becoming common place. Nikola Tesla >was demonstrating "wireless lighting" and other wonders associated with >high frequency currents. There was an excitement about the future like >never before. > >Within 20 years, there would be automobiles, airplanes, movies, recorded >music, telephones, radio, and practical cameras. The Victorian Age was >giving way to something totally new. For the first time in history, common >people were encouraged to envision a utopian future, filled with abundant >modern transportation and communication, as well as jobs, housing and food >for everyone. Disease would be conquered, and so would poverty. Life was >getting better, and this time, everyone was going to get "a piece of the >pie." So, what happened? In the midst of this technological explosion, >where did the energy breakthroughs go? Was all of this excitement about >"free electricity", which happened just before the beginning of the last >century, all just wishful thinking that "real science" eventually >disproved? > >Current State of Technology > >Actually, the answer to that question is NO. In fact, the opposite is true. >Spectacular energy technologies were developed right along with the other >breakthroughs. Since that time, multiple methods for producing vast amounts >of energy at extremely low cost have been developed. None of these >technologies have made it to the "open" consumer market as an article of >commerce, however. Exactly why this is true will be discussed shortly. But >first, I would like to describe to you a short list of "free energy" >technologies that I am currently aware of, and that are proven beyond all >reasonable doubt. The common feature connecting all of these discoveries, >is that they use a small amount of one form of energy to control or release >a large amount of a different kind of energy. Many of them tap the >underlying aether in some way; a source of energy conveniently ignored by >"modern" science. > >1) Radiant Energy. > >Nikola Tesla's Magnifying Transmitter, T. Henry Moray's Radiant Energy >Device, Edwin Gray's EMA Motor, and Paul Baumann's Testatika Machine all >run on Radiant Energy. This natural energy form can be gathered directly >from the environment (mistakenly called "static" electricity) or extracted >from ordinary electricity by the method called "fractionation." Radiant >Energy can perform the same wonders as ordinary electricity, at less than >1% of the cost. It does not behave exactly like electricity, however, which >has contributed to the scientific community's misunderstanding of it. The >Methernitha Community in Switzerland currently has 5 or 6 working models of >fuelless, self-running devices that tap this energy. > >2) Permanent Magnets. > >Dr. Robert Adams (NZ) has developed astounding designs of electric motors, >generators and heaters that run on permanent magnets. One such device draws >100 watts of electricity from the source, generates 100 watts to recharge >the source, and produces over 140 BTU's of heat in two minutes! Dr. Tom >Bearden (USA) has two working models of a permanent magnet powered >electrical transformer. It uses a 6-watt electrical input to control the >path of a magnetic field coming out of a permanent magnet. By channeling >the magnetic field, first to one output coil and then a second output coil, >and by doing this repeatedly and rapidly in a "Ping-Pong" fashion, the >device can produce a 96-watt electrical output with no moving parts. >Bearden calls his device a Motionless Electromagnetic Generator, or MEG. >Jean-Louis Naudin has duplicated Bearden's device in France. The principles >for this type of device were first disclosed by Frank Richardson (USA) in >1978. Troy Reed (USA) has working models of a special magnetized fan that >heats up as it spins. It takes exactly the same amount of energy to spin >the fan whether it is generating heat or not. Beyond these developments, >multiple inventors have identified working mechanisms that produce motor >torque from permanent magnets alone. > >3) Mechanical Heaters. > >There are two classes of machines that transform a small amount of >mechanical energy into a large amount of heat. The best of these purely >mechanical designs are the rotating cylinder systems designed by Frenette >(USA) and Perkins (USA). In these machines, one cylinder is rotated within >another cylinder with about an eighth of an inch of clearance between them. >The space between the cylinders is filled with a liquid such as water or >oil, and it is this "working fluid" that heats up as the inner cylinder >spins. Another method uses magnets mounted on a wheel to produce large eddy >currents in a plate of aluminium, causing the aluminium to heat up rapidly. >These magnetic heaters have been demonstrated by Muller (Canada), Adams >(NZ) and Reed (USA). All of these systems can produce ten times more heat >than standard methods using the same energy input. > >4) Super-Efficient Electrolysis. > >Water can be broken into Hydrogen and Oxygen using electricity. Standard >chemistry books claim that this process requires more energy than can be >recovered when the gases are recombined. This is true only under the worst >case scenario. When water is hit with its own molecular resonant frequency, >using a system developed by Stan Meyers (USA) and again recently by Xogen >Power, Inc., it collapses into Hydrogen and Oxygen gas with very little >electrical input. Also, using different electrolytes (additives that make >the water conduct electricity better) changes the efficiency of the process >dramatically. It is also known that certain geometric structures and >surface textures work better than others do. The implication is that >unlimited amounts of Hydrogen fuel can be made to drive engines (like in >your car) for the cost of water. Even more amazing is the fact that a >special metal alloy was patented by Freedman (USA) in 1957 that >spontaneously breaks water into Hydrogen and Oxygen with no outside >electrical input and without causing any chemical changes in the metal >itself. This means that this special metal alloy can make Hydrogen from >water for free, forever. > >5) Implosion/Vortex. > >All major industrial engines use the release of heat to cause expansion and >pressure to produce work, like in your car engine. Nature uses the opposite >process of cooling to cause suction and vacuum to produce work, like in a >tornado. Viktor Schauberger (Austria) was the first to build working models >of Implosion Engines in the 1930's and 1940's. Since that time, Callum >Coats has published extensively on Schauberger's work in his book Living >Energies and subsequently, a number of researchers have built working >models of Implosion Turbine Engines. These are fuelless engines that >produce mechanical work from energy accessed from a vacuum. There are also >much simpler designs that use vortex motions to tap a combination of >gravity and centrifugal force to produce a continuous motion in fluids. > >6) Cold Fusion. > >In March 1989, two Chemists from Brigham Young University in Utah (USA) >announced that they had produced atomic fusion reactions in a simple >tabletop device. The claims were "debunked" within 6 months and the public >lost interest. Nevertheless, Cold Fusion is very real. Not only has excess >heat production been repeatedly documented, but also low energy atomic >element transmutation has been catalogued, involving dozens of different >reactions! This technology definitely can produce low cost energy and >scores of other important industrial processes. > >7) Solar Assisted Heat Pumps. > >The refrigerator in your kitchen is the only "free energy machine" you >currently own. It's an electrically operated heat pump. It uses one amount >of energy (electricity) to move three amounts of energy (heat). This gives >it a "co-efficient of performance" (COP) of about 3. Your refrigerator uses >one amount of electricity to pump three amounts of heat from the inside of >the refrigerator to the outside of the refrigerator. This is its typical >use, but it is the worst possible way to use the technology. Here's why. A >heat pump pumps heat from the "source" of heat to the "sink" or place that >absorbs the heat. The "source" of heat should obviously be HOT and the >"sink" for heat should obviously be COLD for this process to work the best. >In your refrigerator, it's exactly the opposite. The "source" of heat is >inside the box, which is COLD, and the "sink" for heat is the room >temperature air of your kitchen, which is warmer than the source. This is >why the COP remains low for your kitchen refrigerator. But this is not true >for all heat pumps. COP's of 8 to 10 are easily attained with solar >assisted heat pumps. In such a device, a heat pump draws heat from a solar >collector and dumps the heat into a large underground absorber, which >remains at 55° F, and mechanical energy is extracted in the transfer. This >process is equivalent to a steam engine that extracts mechanical energy >between the boiler and the condenser, except that it uses a fluid that >"boils" at a much lower temperature than water. One such system that was >tested in the 1970's produced 350 hp, measured on a Dynamometer, in a >specially designed engine from just 100-sq. ft. of solar collector. (This >is NOT the system promoted by Dennis Lee.) The amount of energy it took to >run the compressor (input) was less than 20 hp, so this system produced >more than 17 times more energy than it took to keep it going! It could >power a small neighborhood from the roof of a hot tub gazebo, using exactly >the same technology that keeps the food cold in your kitchen. Currently, >there is an industrial scale heat pump system just north of Kona, Hawaii >that generates electricity from temperature differences in ocean water. > >There are dozens of other systems that I have not mentioned, many of them >are as viable and well tested as the ones I have just recounted. But this >short list is sufficient to make my point: free energy technology is here, >now. It offers the world pollution-free, energy abundance for everyone, >everywhere. It is now possible to stop the production of "greenhouse gases" >and shut down all of the nuclear power plants. We can now desalinate >unlimited amounts of seawater at an affordable price, and bring adequate >fresh water to even the most remote habitats. Transportation costs and the >production costs for just about everything can drop dramatically. Food can >even be grown in heated greenhouses in the winter, anywhere. All of these >wonderful benefits that can make life on this planet so much easier and >better for everyone have been postponed for decades. Why? Whose purposes >are served by this postponement? > >The Opportunity > >What is starting to happen is that inventors are publishing their work, >instead of patenting it and keeping it secret. More and more, people are >"giving away" information on these technologies in books, videos and >websites. While there is still a great deal of useless information about >free energy on the Internet, the availability of good information is rising >rapidly. Check out the list of websites and other resources at the end of >this article. > >It is imperative that you begin to gather all of the information you can on >real free energy systems. The reason for this is simple. Focus on what you >can do now, not on how much there still is to be done. Small, private >research groups are working out the details as you read this. Many are >committed to publishing their results on the Internet. > >If we stand up and refuse to remain ignorant and action-less, we can change >the course of history. It is the aggregate of our combined action that can >make a difference. Only the mass action that represents our consensus can >create the world we want. Nevertheless, free energy technology is here. It >is real, and it will change everything about the way we live, work and >relate to each other. In the last analysis, free energy technology >obsoletes greed and the fear for survival. But like all exercises of >Spiritual Faith, we must first manifest the generosity and trust in our own >lives. > >The Source of Free Energy is INSIDE of us. It is that excitement of >expressing ourselves freely. It is our Spiritually guided intuition >expressing itself without distraction, intimidation or manipulation. It is >our open-heartedness. Ideally, the free energy technologies underpin a just >society where everyone has enough food, clothing, shelter, self-worth, and >the leisure time to contemplate the higher Spiritual meanings of Life. Do >we not owe it to each other, to face our fears, and take action to create >this future for our children's children? > >The preceeding is an excerpt. The full version is available at: >http://www.escribe.com/science/keelynet/m10192.html > > >LIST OF RESOURCES: > >Books: > >Living Energies by Callum Coats > >The Free Energy Secrets of Cold Electricity by Peter Lindemann, D.Sc. > >Applied Modern 20th Century Aether Science by Dr. Robert Adams > >Physics Without Einstein by Dr. Harold Aspden > >Secrets of Cold War Technology by Gerry Vassilatos > >The Coming Energy Revolution by Jeanne Manning > >Websites: > >http://www2.murray.net.au/users/egel/content1.htm >developed by Geoff Egel in Australia. Best free-energy site on the net! > >http://www.free-energy.cc/ >developed by Clear Tech, Inc. and Dr. Peter Lindemann > >http://jnaudin.free.fr/ >developed by JLN Labs in France > >http://www.1dove.com/fe/index.html >Jim's Free Energy Page in the USA > >http://www.keelynet.com/ >developed by Jerry Decker in the USA > >http://www.xogen.com >site for super electrolysis technology > >http://www.rumormillnews.com >excellent site for all kinds of alternative news, with many links > >Patents: (most can be viewed at http://www.delphion.com/ ) This list is >nothing more than a sample of inventions that produce free energy. > > > >HAVE A GREAT DAY !!!!! > >:::>><<:::>><<:::>><<:::>><<:::>><<:::>><<::: > >EARTHCODE & INNER LIGHT NETWORK >PO Box 3395 >Santa Cruz, CA 95063 USA >831-454-1440 >earthcode cruzers.com > >:::>><<:::>><<:::>><<:::>><<:::>><<:::>><<::: From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Jun 27 02:04:00 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx2.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id CAA17555; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 02:01:45 -0700 (PDT) Resent-Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 02:01:45 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Sender: mjones pop.jump.net Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: <01062611414700.03429 linux> <01062611414700.03429@linux> Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 03:16:55 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Mitchell Jones Subject: Re: The Green Nazis Resent-Message-ID: <"aoF1a.0.DI4.u3QEx" mx2> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43396 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: >>the air for everyone to 'ingest'. Besides, what is wrong with 'paganism'? > >It depends on wether or not my paradigm is correct doesn't it? > >>Paganism stands for not anything really, or whatever is different from >>YOUR particular trendy opiate of the masses, as Lenin would put it. > >That depends on wether Mitchell or I am correct about the existance >of a creator G-d with a right to rule the Universe. ***{There is no "right to rule," Thomas. There is only the power to rule, and power never lasts: the best among the oppressed, eventually, will find a way to be free. This applies regardless of whether the would-be oppressors are "gods," "democrats," "republicans," or whatever. Slavery is not a good thing, regardless of whether it takes place in "Heaven" or on Earth. --MJ}*** >>All those 'ism's' get in the way of understanding by forcing a two >>dimensional view of the universe through a screen of pigeonholes. > >Progress, OMHO is made when you view the Universe through the "lense" >of your particular paradigm. ***{No, progress is made by those who adjust their paradigms to fit the facts. --MJ}*** Based on that paradigm you either >notice, or fail to notice things, aspects, which either conflict or >are predicted by your pet paradigm. ***{Beliefs should be subjected to continuous criticism, by oneself and by others, and that process should be accompanied by a continuous series of adjustments, the magnitude of which, in each case, should be the minimum necessary to eliminate contradictions. You should not be too quick to abandon a belief, or too slow: there is a proper balance between the two, and maintaining it is an art. What is sure, however, is that "pet" paradigms should not be maintained. --MJ}*** >>Progress is not made that way. Classification of some things is fine. >>Carried to extremes it progressively evolves into prejudice and >>stigmatization based petty differences. As the Jews would say: >> .........."Enough already!" > >OTOH, with out classification, there would be no science or >understanding of the Universe ***{True, but continuous adjustments in one's classifications are also necessary, in response to the discovery of new facts--e.g., sometimes you have to start imagining warm-blooded dinosaurs with feathers, regardless of how many years you had habitually classified them as cold-blooded reptiles with scales. A classification system that is frozen into stasis reflects the dogmatism of a closed mind. --MJ}*** >>Standing Bear >>rockcast net-link.net >> >>We need not search the world for 'nutzies', they are all around us, >>creating small boxes enabling dimwits to confuse understanding >>with obfuscation and confusion. > >Hum, I think most the dimwits are watching daytime TV. ***{I don't think there are any dimwits in this group. There are, however, some who are guilty of compartmentalized thinking--which means: they apply reason in some areas of their lives, but not in others. (You know who you are. :-) --MJ}*** ________________ Quote of the month: "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value--i.e., zero." --Voltaire From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Jun 27 03:54:05 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx2.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id DAA07295; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 03:52:09 -0700 (PDT) Resent-Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 03:52:09 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <025c01c0feee$ba862940$8eb4bfa8 computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: Cc: Subject: Re: Antigravity: Only a Materials Problem? Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 04:50:47 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Resent-Message-ID: <"zO1er3.0.tn1.MhREx" mx2> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43397 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: In one of the Biefield-Brown articles it was stated that "110% weight reduction was achieved". This implies that the skin/superstructure of a craft that is made to go weightless using high intensity electric fields should either be very large or very heavy, or both, so that the "extra 10%" countergravity force can be used for lifting the crew, cargo and the propulsion means. The energy for charging the countergravity capacitors for achieving weightlessness doesn't amount to much, but the energy required for maneuvering the craft, crew and cargo is the same as that required for a dirigible or a balloon in the atmosphere. However, once escape velocity is reached (in space) the weightlessness force becomes the propulsive force. Those large "flying saucer" shapes of UFOs are looking better all the time. :-) Regards, Frederick From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Jun 27 07:44:35 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id HAA00405; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 07:43:58 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 07:43:58 -0700 X-Apparently-From: Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.20010626223120.009b7690 postoffice.swbell.net> X-Sender: cjford1 pop.mail.yahoo.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58 Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 22:40:57 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Charles Ford Subject: Re: The Green Nazis In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <"jZEgd.0.16.k4VEx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43398 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 01:32 AM 6/26/01 -0500, you wrote: >> Since this character flaw is exhibited by monotheists and >>polytheists alike, you cannot decide how crazy a particular theist is, by And don't forget environmentalists, realists, economists and scientists. Are all of the "ists" crazy too? People will always hide behind titles to do deplorable things. Always remember when you affiliate yourself with any group or organization by saying "I am a ____" Someone will find the most deplorable thing that any "____" has done and hold you responsible for it. Charlie Ford KC5-OWZ cjford1 yahoo.com cjford1 swbell.net _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Jun 27 07:57:15 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id HAA08557; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 07:56:29 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 07:56:29 -0700 X-Apparently-From: Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.20010626224844.009db6b0 postoffice.swbell.net> X-Sender: cjford1 pop.mail.yahoo.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58 Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 22:53:32 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Charles Ford Subject: Re: Hydro Environmental Resources, HERI In-Reply-To: References: <0GFH004B6PU1K8 mta8.pltn13.pbi.net> <0GFH004B6PU1K8 mta8.pltn13.pbi.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <"9HeAB1.0.d52.TGVEx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43399 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 01:32 AM 6/26/01 -0500, you wrote: >>The company touts their "ElectroChem Hydrogen Fuel Reactor system" but > >I'm suspicious of a company that doesn't have any contact information. > >> >> In the mean time don't forget to call your broker. > >Nothing I ever learned in Chemistry could account for what they are >claiming. I wouldn't invest unless I witnessed a demonstration of their >technology. Hay is this one of those Mafia front company scams I saw on the news? You know they put up something attractive and sell it out to investors but there is no real assets or real product to the organization so when it folds up your money just vanishes. Even if not. After the fall of the dot com's I would definitely require a demo... Charlie Ford KC5-OWZ cjford1 yahoo.com cjford1 swbell.net _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Jun 27 09:31:05 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id JAA00588; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 09:30:38 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 09:30:38 -0700 Message-ID: <006f01c0ff1b$e07c0d40$8a181ad8 oemcomputer> From: "Bruce Meland" To: "Remy C." Cc: Subject: Fw: real costs for oil Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 08:14:15 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_006C_01C0FEE1.341D3540" Resent-Message-ID: <"cwzH01.0.u8.jeWEx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43400 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_006C_01C0FEE1.341D3540 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit -----Original Message----- From: Saint-Hilaire To: Ami(e)s de la Date: Saturday, February 17, 2001 8:41 PM Subject: Quasiturbine - Le vrai coût du pétrole ? >Le vrai coût du pétrole ? > >"When externalities such as environmental and health costs, the loss of >domestic jobs and basic industries, the trade deficit, commitments of >military resources to ensure the free flow of oil from the Middle East, and >threats to our energy and national security are included, the true cost of >imports exceeds $100 a barrel, according to the General Accounting Office." > http://www.obeleoil.com/oilshock2.htm >By retired Air Force General G. Lee Butler, Chief Air Planner >for Operation Desert Storm, stated in the Wall Street Journal. > >Rappelons-nous que la Quasiturbine fait meilleur usage du pétrole ! > >Salutations, Gilles >http://quasiturbine.promci.qc.ca >********************************************* ------=_NextPart_000_006C_01C0FEE1.341D3540 Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset="iso-8859-1"; name="saint-hilaire.vcf" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Description: Card for Saint-Hilaire Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="saint-hilaire.vcf" begin:vcard n:Saint-Hilaire;Gilles tel;fax:514-527-9530 tel;work:514-527-8484 x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:http://quasiturbine.promci.qc.ca org:Président par intérim;Quasiturbine Tronçonneuses Inc. adr:;;Casier 2804 - 3535 Papineau;Montréal;Québec;H2K4J9;Canada version:2.1 email;internet:quasiturbine promci.qc.ca title:Gilles Saint-Hilaire note:La Quasiturbine : Un moteur respectueux de l'environnement ...! fn:quasiturbine.promci.qc.ca end:vcard ------=_NextPart_000_006C_01C0FEE1.341D3540-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Jun 27 10:55:54 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id KAA11361; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 10:55:13 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 10:55:13 -0700 Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20010627133030.02ab4db0 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 13:51:14 -0400 To: vortex-L eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: Re: Fw: real costs for oil In-Reply-To: <006f01c0ff1b$e07c0d40$8a181ad8 oemcomputer> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <"2gDX02.0.On2.0uXEx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43401 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: I cannot find the article on this web page (http://www.obeleoil.com/oilshock2.htm) that says oil really costs $100 per barrel, but I did find a hilarious statement in another article titled What Will Replace Oil, written by someone with an terminal case of tunnel vision. The article has exactly one statement addressing the issue raised in the title. It is correct as far as it goes: "What Will Replace Oil? One thing is certain, long before the lights are turned off and we are forced to huddle around fires for warmth, a viable replacement for oil *will be found*. However, as there is little currently on the horizon that falls into this category, we will not dwell long on the subject." Indeed, they do not dwell on it at all, anywhere. I imagine someone writing in 1840, "we will find a viable source of oil after all the whales are killed, but there is little currently on the horizon . . ." Viable replacements for oil can be found everywhere you turn, ranging from next generation fission, to wind power, to cold fusion. There are dozens of potential sources, and many of them are close to being economically competitive, even though they have not been mass produced or given half a chance. The problem is not that we have too few choices, but too many. The government hands over billions of dollars in subsidies and protection money to oil, and $3.6 billion per year to nuclear power. If it offered that kind of largess to wind power or cold fusion for a few years they would be far cheaper and better than oil. I think it would actually help if we started running out of oil, or if OPEC would turn the screws and double the cost, but neither event is likely. It is often said that the stone age did not end because we ran out of stone. The oil age will not end because we find ourselves running out of oil, or because oil pollution kills people and makes our lives miserable. It will end when something cheaper and better overcomes heavy handed industry and government support for oil and other obsolete technology. - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Jun 27 11:26:56 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id LAA24725; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 11:25:55 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 11:25:55 -0700 Message-ID: <002101c0ff54$509d5d80$f23e9aac default> From: "Thomas D. Clark" To: "vortex" Cc: "Thomas D. Clark" Subject: Model of All Energies(Gravity Etc.) of the Human Body & Environment Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 14:58:33 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3612.1700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3612.1700 X-Apparently-From: ConexTom aol.com Resent-Message-ID: <"bitoQ.0.A26.oKYEx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43402 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Model of All Energies(Gravity Etc.) of the Human Body & Environment I have listed below a model that I have developed of all the energy vortex feedback and feed forward loops for all Energies of all natural systems to better explain how Gravitons or gravity waves may work. First I will list all definitions of all Energies to be discussed in terms of Holograms or Energies, Wave Perspectives, Particle Perspectives, Source of the Energies and Properties of the Energies. Then I will detail all of the energy vortex loops. I will then list all of the frequencies of the emotions and the DNA strands which may be translated into sound and gravity waves. The symbol "~" shall be defined as "similar to": Definitions and Properties of all Energies: Gravity Energies (Holograms) Gravity Wave Perspective Natural gravity waves are at right angles (90 degrees) to electrical waves which are at right angles to magnetic waves which are at right angles to antigravity or levity waves. Antigravity waves are 180 degrees from electrical waves and gravity waves are 180 degrees from magnetic waves. Magnetic-Electrical Waves~Some Cosmic Waves & Some IR & UV Waevs.~Super Light~C^2(10^20)~Subatomic Gravity Particle Perspective Proton(Neutrons>Nutrinos>Gravitons) ~Tacheyons (Time Particles) Magnetic polarized particles in the same orientation or flow~geometric resonance's in the same harmonic flow. Gravity Wave Sources: Gravity Waves may be generated approximately by mechanical devices such as particle accelerators (magnetic coils, polarized antennas, & natural harmonic spherical resonance's) Such mechanical approximate waves are a combination of Longitudinal waves (Vertical Waves) and Transverse Waves (Horizontal Waves) and Residue Waves called Undistorted Progressive Waves (UPW) which together approximate natural gravity waves.. Gravity Waves may be generated by natural sources such as the human mind /body /soul/sun/blackwhole and magnets or crystals. These waves can not be generated mechanically but only approximately. Properties of Gravity Waves There may be a gravity wave for every light wave so there may be thousands of different types of gravity waves. Also gravity waves are smaller or larger than light waves and so there may be hundreds of gravity waves for every light wave. So a subset of gravity waves may approximate a light wave and a light wave may approximate a subset of gravity waves. Some graviton particles may be similar to photon particles 10^12 or 10^13 near IR and UV waves and some gravitons may be 10^-50m ~Weak Gravity 10^-56m~Tachyeons (Time energy particles) Light Energies(Holograms) Light Wave Perspective: C(10^10)~Electrical-Magnetic Waves Thermal~Pressure~Plasma~Gas~Liquid ~Solid~Temperature Energies of Light Ultraviolet (UV) Waves Infrared(IR) Waves Particles Perspective Subatomic Particles ~Electrons~Photons Mechanical Energies (Sound Holograms) Sound Wave Perspective Atmospheric Waves~Molecular Waves~Gas~Waves Feed forward and feedback loops of all Energies for all natural systems: Energy Vortexes: The 5 Environmental Energy vertical vortexes which each have vertical north-south poles: Universal Center<>Universal Edge Galactic Center<>Galactic Edge Solar Center<>Solar Edge Planetary Center<>Planetary Edge Individual Center<>Individual Edge The center and edges of the above energy vortexes each have a time energy vortex loop from the center to the edge and from the edge to center. The 3 Individual Energy horizontal tripolar vortexes: Mind Vortex<>Soul Vortex<>Body Vortex The human soul creates a spiritual vortex which focuses energy or sorts all energies coming from the vertical (y axis) Planetary center and edge, Solar center and edge (sun), the Galactic center and edge (black whole), and the Universal center and edge (Beginning of Time and End of Time) into a soul centropy point or a sphere (Compressed/Imploded /Braided/ Fractalized/Nesting/Recursion/Shareable/Self Similar Geometric Patterns) . There are two energy flows from the beginning of time to the end of time and from the end of time to the beginning of time which creates a feed forward and feedback time energy vortex loop. There are also vertical feedback and feed forward nesting loops or energy shells from south pole to the north pole of the mind-body-soul vortex which branches out into nested loops or energy shells of the south pole and north pole of the solar, galactic, and universal center vortexes. The human mind/soul/body creates a tripolar vertical ` feed forward feedback loop. The mind creates a logical vortex which focuses or sorts energies from the vertical soul vortex center and from the horizontal body vortex. The horizontal body energy vortex feeds back energies from the brain's electrical magnetic waves and the heart sound waves, the organs and gland sound waves into emotion waves which travel in a horizontal spiral through the soul's vertical gravity energy spherical vortex and picks up soul or aether/gravity information which then are perceived as feelings in the logical human mind vortex The perceptions of the logical mind vortex are then encoded as future and past memories in Holographic DNA soul meme (12 strands) energy strands and DNA body gene strands(2 to 12 depending on body/soul/mind /environmental states). All of the vortex energies may viewed as sine waves which have an amplitude representing the intensity of the energy, and a distance between amplitudes which represent a scalar gravity soul wave, and a frequency of amplitudes which represents the energy type in terms of wavelength. The emotions may be viewed as scaler gravity waves which have a distance between waves to represent the type of emotions as: The frequencies of the emotions and DNA which may be translated into sound waves and gravity waves are as follows: The emotions distance measure between heart beat sound waves: This chart came from the Dan Winter web site at www.danwinter.com Sadness Grief . 4 Security Pleasure .5 Wonder/Love .6= Compassion .618 Phi Sincerity Truth .7 Peace Openness .8 Well Being Reality .9 Satisfaction Intellect 1.0 The frequencies of the UV spectrum which best correlates to the DNA strands are: These UV measures came from the Susan Alexander Web site at http://www.healingmusic.org/SusanA/ ADENINE GUANINE Hz # Wave # Hz # Wave 3l5.6 723 300.3 688 347.9 797 305.6 700 368.0 843 339.2 777 379.8 870 370.2 848 398.l 9l2 383.2 878 408.l 935 4l3.4 947 447.4 l025 487.6 lll7 490.2 ll23 5l2.9 ll75 504.2 ll55 529.5 l2l3 545.6 l250 550.0 l260 582.7 l335 600.2 l375 598.0 l370 6l5.5 l4l0 6l9.8 l420 64l.7 l470 632.9 l450 663.5 l520 654.8 l500 728.9 l670 698.4 l600 ll69.8 2680 726.7 l665 l278.9 2930 ll39.2 26l0 l366.2 3l30 ll78.5 2700 l462.3 3350 l248.3 2860 l278.9 2930 l366.2 3l30 l440.5 3300 THYMINE CYTOSINE 322.l 738 305.6 700 330.4 757 345.7 792 354.4 8l2 357.9 820 363.2 832 420.3 963 406.4 93l 429.l 983 427.8 980 440.9 l0l0 447.4 l025 504.2 ll55 523.8 l200 537.8 l232 543.4 l245 558.7 l280 600.2 l375 594.9 l363 733.3 l680 639.5 l465 768.2 l760 654.8 l500 l248.3 2860 7l3.7 l635 l274.6 2920 l276.8 2925 l385.8 3l75 l375.0 3l50 l475.4 3380 I appreciate your attention to these matters. Respectively, President, Thomas Clark Radiation Health Foundation (RHF) Inc., RHF Buisness web site at: http://www.rhfweb.com/ Personal website at http://www.rhfweb.com/personal New Age Productions Inc. at http://www.rhfweb.com/newage Email: tom rhfweb From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Jun 27 13:36:38 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id NAA16493; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 13:35:51 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 13:35:51 -0700 Message-ID: <01C0FF0E.76E1FA00.dequickert ucdavis.edu> From: Dan Quickert To: "'vortex-l eskimo.com'" Subject: RE: Model of All Energies(Gravity Etc.) of the Human Body & Environment Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 13:38:24 -0700 X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet E-mail/MAPI - 8.0.0.4211 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"LDgFm1.0.b14.cEaEx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43403 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: On Wednesday, June 27, 2001 2:59 PM, Thomas D. Clark wrote: > Natural gravity waves are at right angles (90 > degrees) to electrical waves which are at right > angles to magnetic waves which are at right > angles to antigravity or levity waves. Antigravity > waves are 180 degrees from electrical waves and > gravity waves are 180 degrees from magnetic > waves. > Gravity Waves may be generated by natural > sources such as the human mind /body > /soul/sun/blackwhole and magnets or > crystals. These waves can not be generated > mechanically but only approximately. What evidence do you have for the above assertions? How is "approximately" an alternative to "mechanically"? and, by "blackwhole" do you mean "black hole"? > There may be a gravity wave for every light > wave so there may be thousands of different > types of gravity waves. Also gravity waves are > smaller or larger than light waves and so there > may be hundreds of gravity waves for every > light wave. So a subset of gravity waves may The conclusion of the first statement above appears to require that there are thousands of "types" of light waves. If by that you do not mean "wavelength", what differentiates their "type"? How is each gravity waves "smaller or larger" than its associated light wave? >Tacheyons (Time Particles) When did time exhibit particulate properties? >~Super Light What' that?? and what the hell is a "soul centropy point"? "emotion wave"? "scalar gravity soul wave"? Where do you get this stuff? > I appreciate your attention to these matters. Are you serious? This appears to be less than rampant speculation, it appears more like mindless agglomerations of made-up jargon with a few pieces of reality tossed in to make it sound like something with substance. If you have basis for these pronouncements, please provide them so we can understand how you may have derived them. Without such, we can only conclude that you are engaging in fantasy, not science. > Respectively, >President, Thomas Clark >From this spectator's perspective it would be more special if you would post "respectfully", which would preclude being purely speculative. There are other venues for that, and if posters would stick to their respective topics rather than coming from the opposite end of the spectrum, they would garner more respect. Hey, I wonder if speculation is a particular act done with specula? ;-) Disrespectively, Dan Quickert From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Jun 27 13:54:34 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id NAA23187; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 13:53:47 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 13:53:47 -0700 Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20010627161406.02ab6fd0 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 16:53:40 -0400 To: vortex-l eskimo.com, vortex-l@eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: Scott Little is very good at calorimetry In-Reply-To: References: <002801c0fe61$95c878c0$a7181ad8 oemcomputer> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <"UizSe2.0.1g5.PVaEx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43404 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Mitchell Jones wrote: >***{This is the outfit that, upon receiving a supposed "extraterrestrial >object"--i.e., a varistor that was popped off of a power line by a >lightning strike--immediately sent it to Earth Tech (Scott Little's >organization) for analysis. See http://www.nidsci.org/news/varistor.pdf. >--MJ}*** That's a marvelous little report. They went above and beyond the call of duty. Too much work for such a prosaic object. I would have stopped after figuring out it was a varistor. > > Most of what his stable of scientists learn is kept > >private by Bigelow. He orders a few crumbs of information to > >be thrown out to the public from time to time to keep up the > >illusion that NIDS is a public-service enterprise. Nothing > >could be farther from the truth. > > The Cabal wants ET technology, and the wealth and > >power which come from possessing it, all to themselves. > > > > Richard Boylan, Ph.D. > >***{Perhaps we should begin placing somewhat less weight on Scott Little's >negative CF results than we have in the past--myself included. --MJ}*** What?!? I do not follow the logic of this statement. The report referenced above was fine, and no one can doubt that Scott Little's negative results were decisively negative. His calorimetry is very good. His ICCF lecture, showing the calibration with a rechargeable battery, was one of the best lectures I have heard about calorimetry. It is clear that Little has not been able to replicate excess heat in various experiments. In some cases I suspect the original experiment never produced heat. In some cases the original probably worked, but we can't be positive. I expect Ohmori's glow discharge experiments produce excess heat, and Little has not been able to replicate them. I have a few lingering doubts. Little would have to work another 6 months to 1 year, or alternatively several other people would have to replicate Ohmori before I can be sure. I never dismiss a hard-working amateur (since I am one myself!), but on the other hand Ohmori has worked for many years, and Little only did this only a few months. Ohmori does have a PhD and 30 years experience doing similar experiments. You have to take that into account. People who work for a lifetime with small objects learn terrific amount. They know more than they can say, or teach. It is most important to remember that Ohmori has been replicated a few times by others in Japan. All in all, I would bet Ohmori is right, but I don't mind withholding final judgement for a long as it takes. Little was clearly unable to replicate the conventional P&F technique, which definitely does produce excess heat when performed correctly. This can take years of effort to master, the success rate is low, and Little simply has not been able to devote that kind of time to it. That isn't his fault. He made a better effort than many people did. My only complaint about him is that sometimes -- occasionally . . . once in a blue moon -- he makes the mistake of assuming that other people's results cannot be trusted because he cannot reproduce them. He is not the gold standard. You cannot judge reality by what happens in his lab. He shouldn't judge it on that basis alone -- although naturally his results will strongly influence his own views! The laboratory is the final arbiter of science, by not necessarily MY laboratory or YOUR laboratory. It is "the" laboratory; an abstract entity, referring to an amorphous cloud of laboratories considered as a group. In fact, nobody is the gold standard. No one's results can be fully trusted. There is no final arbiter, no central gold standard, and no single scientist or authority we can turn to. The best and most skilled among them, such as Fleischmann, McKubre, Storms and Miles, have their blind spots. Sometimes they say things which other people find silly, or without evidence. (Other people include me; I do not agree with everything these people say, but our disagreements are unimportant.) You can trust some things about some people, and not others. When Scott Little says he detects no excess heat, I trust him completely. He is not making a stupid mistake the way Nate Lewis or Williams did back in 1989. When he implies that he fully grasps the electrochemistry, this is surely a correct replication, and we can conclude Ohmori is making a mistake, I do not agree. - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Jun 27 13:57:27 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id NAA24522; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 13:57:02 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 13:57:02 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: rick mail.highsurf.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <002101c0ff54$509d5d80$f23e9aac default> References: <002101c0ff54$509d5d80$f23e9aac default> Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 10:43:49 -1000 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Rick Monteverde Subject: Re: Model of All Energies(Gravity Etc.) of the Human Body & Environment Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Resent-Message-ID: <"A7ZKJ.0.z-5.TYaEx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43405 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Thomas - > I appreciate your attention to these matters Sorry, but it all looks like nonsense to me, with physics terms strung together in random order. Is it supposed to be art, like an ascii version of an abstract painting? - Rick Monteverde Honolulu, HI From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Jun 27 14:22:20 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id OAA02467; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 14:21:35 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 14:21:35 -0700 Message-ID: <02db01c0ff46$a7f63ce0$8eb4bfa8 computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: , "Francis J. Stenger" Cc: Subject: The X-ray Century - December 1896 Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 15:20:31 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0005_01C0FF1C.B4C8CE80" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Resent-Message-ID: <"tniqa3.0.Tc.UvaEx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43406 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C0FF1C.B4C8CE80 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Interesting coverage of early x-ray and radioactivity discoveries. http://www.emory.edu/X-RAYS/century.htm ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C0FF1C.B4C8CE80 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="The X-ray Century - December 1896.url" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="The X-ray Century - December 1896.url" [DEFAULT] BASEURL=http://www.emory.edu/X-RAYS/century.htm [InternetShortcut] URL=http://www.emory.edu/X-RAYS/century.htm Modified=E0D19E3846FFC0018D ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C0FF1C.B4C8CE80-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Jun 27 15:15:15 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id PAA23022; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 15:14:28 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 15:14:28 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Sender: mjones pop.jump.net Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <5.0.2.1.2.20010627161406.02ab6fd0 pop.mindspring.com> References: <002801c0fe61$95c878c0$a7181ad8 oemcomputer> Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 17:10:25 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Mitchell Jones Subject: Re: Scott Little is very good at calorimetry Resent-Message-ID: <"8EvmI1.0.cd5.2hbEx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43407 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: >Mitchell Jones wrote: > >>***{This is the outfit that, upon receiving a supposed "extraterrestrial >>object"--i.e., a varistor that was popped off of a power line by a >>lightning strike--immediately sent it to Earth Tech (Scott Little's >>organization) for analysis. See http://www.nidsci.org/news/varistor.pdf. >>--MJ}*** > >That's a marvelous little report. ***{Agreed. --MJ}*** They went above and beyond the call of >duty. Too much work for such a prosaic object. I would have stopped after >figuring out it was a varistor. ***{I like detail, and I think he should have carried the analysis all the way to the end, as he did. --MJ}*** >> > Most of what his stable of scientists learn is kept >> >private by Bigelow. He orders a few crumbs of information to >> >be thrown out to the public from time to time to keep up the >> >illusion that NIDS is a public-service enterprise. Nothing >> >could be farther from the truth. >> > The Cabal wants ET technology, and the wealth and >> >power which come from possessing it, all to themselves. >> > >> > Richard Boylan, Ph.D. >> >>***{Perhaps we should begin placing somewhat less weight on Scott Little's >>negative CF results than we have in the past--myself included. --MJ}*** > >What?!? I do not follow the logic of this statement. ***{Note that I said "perhaps." The intent of that word was to express uncertainty. The reason for the uncertainty was that I don't know Richard Boylan from Adam, and thus am not in a position to judge the accuracy of his take on Robert Bigelow. However, if his view of Bigelow is accurate--i.e., if he has a background that traces into the CIA, and is connected with groups within the government which seek the suppression of ET technology--then I can easily imagine that Scott would be given a free hand to post negative reports of his various investigations, but that, as soon as a solid positive threatened to emerge, he would find that the aforesaid freedom was curtailed. Result: his reports would be biased in the negative direction in fact, though he would be unaware of that state of affairs himself, until the day he became convinced that he had a solid positive result, and indicated an intent to post same. How he would react to that discovery--whether he would refused to be silenced, or would go along in order to get along--is a question that I cannot answer with certainty, and, because of that, I am forced to place less credence on reports from Earth Tech in the future, than I have in the past. Simply put: I do not *like* the CIA, or trust them, and I do not trust anyone connected to them. --MJ}*** The report referenced >above was fine, and no one can doubt that Scott Little's negative results >were decisively negative. His calorimetry is very good. His ICCF lecture, >showing the calibration with a rechargeable battery, was one of the best >lectures I have heard about calorimetry. ***{He knows his stuff, no doubt about it. But so do lots of people with CIA and NSA connections, and I wouldn't trust any of them as far as I could throw the Eiffel Tower. --MJ}*** >It is clear that Little has not been able to replicate excess heat in >various experiments. In some cases I suspect the original experiment never >produced heat. In some cases the original probably worked, but we can't be >positive. I expect Ohmori's glow discharge experiments produce excess heat, >and Little has not been able to replicate them. I have a few lingering >doubts. Little would have to work another 6 months to 1 year, or >alternatively several other people would have to replicate Ohmori before I >can be sure. I never dismiss a hard-working amateur (since I am one >myself!), but on the other hand Ohmori has worked for many years, and >Little only did this only a few months. Ohmori does have a PhD and 30 years >experience doing similar experiments. You have to take that into account. ***{You also have to take unsavory political connections and potential conflicts of interest into account. --MJ}*** >People who work for a lifetime with small objects learn terrific amount. >They know more than they can say, or teach. It is most important to >remember that Ohmori has been replicated a few times by others in Japan. >All in all, I would bet Ohmori is right, but I don't mind withholding final >judgement for a long as it takes. ***{I don't know either, and I am not sure that Robert Bigelow is in fact connected to the CIA, but given the nature of the CIA, I take the possibility very, very seriously. --MJ}*** > >Little was clearly unable to replicate the conventional P&F technique, >which definitely does produce excess heat when performed correctly. This >can take years of effort to master, the success rate is low, and Little >simply has not been able to devote that kind of time to it. That isn't his >fault. He made a better effort than many people did. ***{Yup. --MJ}*** >My only complaint about him is that sometimes -- occasionally . . . once in >a blue moon -- he makes the mistake of assuming that other people's results >cannot be trusted because he cannot reproduce them. ***{I have perceived in Scott, on occasion, hints of what Ayn Rand used to describe as "hatred of the good for being the good." Those hints, coupled with these recent revelations about Bigelow, plus the various tidbits posted here in the past concerning Hal Puthoff's CIA background, just fit together a bit too neatly for me to ignore. You, of course, are free to ignore them if you like. --MJ}*** He is not the gold >standard. You cannot judge reality by what happens in his lab. He shouldn't >judge it on that basis alone -- although naturally his results will >strongly influence his own views! The laboratory is the final arbiter of >science, by not necessarily MY laboratory or YOUR laboratory. It is "the" >laboratory; an abstract entity, referring to an amorphous cloud of >laboratories considered as a group. > >In fact, nobody is the gold standard. No one's results can be fully >trusted. There is no final arbiter, no central gold standard, and no single >scientist or authority we can turn to. The best and most skilled among >them, such as Fleischmann, McKubre, Storms and Miles, have their blind >spots. Sometimes they say things which other people find silly, or without >evidence. (Other people include me; I do not agree with everything these >people say, but our disagreements are unimportant.) You can trust some >things about some people, and not others. When Scott Little says he detects >no excess heat, I trust him completely. ***{I have shared that attitude for years, but that was because I thought Scott had a free hand, rather than because I thought he would have the integrity to resist pressure if pressure were applied. Now, however, I find myself forced to consider the possibility that he does *not* have a free hand, and, thus, to ask myself whether I would expect him to refuse to be silenced, if pressure were applied. Since, quite honestly, I must answer that in the negative, my confidence in his reports, of necessity, has been reduced. --MJ}*** He is not making a stupid mistake >the way Nate Lewis or Williams did back in 1989. When he implies that he >fully grasps the electrochemistry, this is surely a correct replication, >and we can conclude Ohmori is making a mistake, I do not agree. > >- Jed ***{A very sober analysis, and I agree with a lot of it, but not all, as noted above. --MJ}*** ________________ Quote of the month: "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value--i.e., zero." --Voltaire From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Jun 27 16:09:07 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id QAA13715; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 16:08:28 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 16:08:28 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: rick mail.highsurf.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: <002801c0fe61$95c878c0$a7181ad8 oemcomputer> Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 12:56:44 -1000 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Rick Monteverde Subject: Re: Scott Little is very good at calorimetry Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Resent-Message-ID: <"nk-o72.0.vL3.eTcEx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43408 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Mitchell - It's all rumor and innuendo! But I think you've said enough to be fairly put on the spot, so here goes. What do you really think about Scott's CF experiments? Has he pulled an MIT here and intentionally fumbled his CF experiments and/or misreported them to hide successful results? - Rick Monteverde Honolulu, HI From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Jun 27 16:30:31 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id QAA23845; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 16:29:20 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 16:29:20 -0700 Message-ID: <002a01c0ff7e$ccd8db20$f23e9aac default> From: "Thomas D. Clark" To: "vortex" , Cc: "Thomas D. Clark" Subject: RE: Model of All Energies - My speculative evidence! Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 20:02:37 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3612.1700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3612.1700 X-Apparently-From: Ethicsj aol.com Resent-Message-ID: <"WNV6f1.0.Tq5.FncEx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43409 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Dan Quickert Dear Mr. Dan Quickert: Thank you for responding to my article on A Model of Energies.... All the emails that I have posted to vortex have been speculative. I do not have the funds to do experimental research with a laboratory. I am a computer scientist and a logician by profession. I only do research into the radiation sciences as a necessary hobby to protect privacy rights. Since I am a trained logician and philosopher of science in the tradition of logical positivism, all my research involves reading email articles and physics books and then using logic to deduce my conclusions often based on logical principles of symmetry in nature. Since I noticed that there is an electrical and a magnetic gravity field at right angles to each other, I just then assumed by symmetry that there would be a gravity and antigravity field at right angles to each other and to the electromagnetic forces. The reasoning and evidence that I use in my articles are purely mathematical or logical in nature and only intended to be used as a model for simulation to stimulate experimental testing by others with such facilities. . I shall mention this at the start of any of my emails from now on. I do apologize if the vortex forum is only for experimental facts, I was not aware of this. I was encouraged by others who have sent me emails to speculate and post the information. My goals for the Radiation Health Foundation are only primarily to manage and speculate, and then hire others to do the scientific experimental research to validate the theories. I will try to limit the emails I send form now on, if things get to hot, and just make references to my web site. I am also having problems with my web site running properly. I may not be able to post articles there soon. Thank you for pointing our my spelling error of respectively for respectfully, I shall correct it. Respectfully, President, Thomas Clark Radiation Health Foundation (RHF) Inc., RHF Buisness web site at: http://www.rhfweb.com/ Personal website at http://www.rhfweb.com/personal New Age Media Productions at http://www.rhfweb.com/newage Email: tom rhfweb.com From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Jun 27 17:30:49 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id RAA13074; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 17:29:53 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 17:29:53 -0700 Reply-To: From: "Keith Nagel" To: "Vortex" Subject: Robert Bigelow Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 20:36:07 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Importance: Normal Resent-Message-ID: <"EDNjl2.0.5C3._fdEx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43410 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Hi All Seems the notion has been floated that Vort's own Scott Little is a card carrying member of the shadowy illuminati conspiracy; kindly embodied by one Robert Bigelow. A little web search would turn up quite a bit of public domain knowledge, I suggest trying so. Here's a sample, a backgrounder from the Fortean folks... http://www.parascope.com/nb/articles/bigelow.htm Of course the man's web site is here. http://www.nidsci.org/ and I suppose what he feels in appropriate bio info is here. http://www.nidsci.org/bios/bigelow.html read some of the speeches, the guy's certainly a maverick. He's also pretty wealthy, based on the other companies mentioned which are his holdings. Otherwise, he seems to be funding a lot of strange stuff, know anybody else doing this? For that I have great respect for the man. He seems pretty desperate to get out into space as well. I suppose if I had a warp engine and needed to commercialize it I'd know who to talk to (smile). K. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Jun 27 18:40:18 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id SAA04296; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 18:39:49 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 18:39:49 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Sender: mjones pop.jump.net Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: <002801c0fe61$95c878c0$a7181ad8 oemcomputer> Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 20:32:38 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Mitchell Jones Subject: Re: Scott Little is very good at calorimetry Resent-Message-ID: <"rs0si3.0.231.aheEx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43411 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: >Mitchell - > >It's all rumor and innuendo! ***{Um, no, it's not all rumor, and nothing I said was in the form of innuendo. To be specific, it is not a rumor that the outfit in Nevada sent their flying varistor to Earth Tech in Austin, 1500 miles away, of all places. I picked up on the strangeness of that instantly when I read Scott's report, even before I read the piece about Bigelow. And there have been many posts to this group over the years referring to Hal Puthoff's supposed role in sub-rosa e.s.p. research for the government. That's not rumor either, or, if it is, it is rumor that he has had ample opportunity to deny and has neglected to do so. Nor is the stuff about Earth Tech's "deep pockets" investor a rumor. We have heard it here, straight out of Scott's mouth. Given that context, the piece about Bigelow acquired an eerie verisimilitude, and one that it would be foolish to ignore. --MJ}*** But I think you've said enough to be >fairly put on the spot, so here goes. What do you really think about >Scott's CF experiments? Has he pulled an MIT here and intentionally >fumbled his CF experiments and/or misreported them to hide successful >results? ***{Until this stuff came up, I would have said no emphatically and without hesitation. Now, however, I can only say I think not, but do not know. Please understand: I have no axe to grind here. For all I know, Robert Bigelow may be a great guy, and the piece attacking him may be pure bull. Nevertheless, the alleged CIA connection bothers me, and until I obtain enough information to discount it, I am inclined to distrust the man and any institution to which he is connected. That's why I brought the matter up, in fact: in hopes that we could get a discussion going that would bring forward enough information to settle the question, one way or the other. --Mitchell Jones}*** >- Rick Monteverde >Honolulu, HI ________________ Quote of the month: "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value--i.e., zero." --Voltaire From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Jun 27 19:01:11 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id SAA11863; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 18:59:28 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 18:59:28 -0700 Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 18:57:36 -0700 From: Jones Beene Subject: Re: Robert Bigelow To: Vortex Reply-to: jonesb9 pacbell.net Message-id: <0GFM001SWAV07G mta5.snfc21.pbi.net> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Opera 5.11 build 904 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Resent-Message-ID: <"GRyH7.0.Cv2.0-eEx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43412 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Keith Nagel wrote: >...Scott Little is a card carrying member of the shadowy illuminati :-) >conspiracy; kindly embodied by one Robert Bigelow. Yes indeed, conspiracy theorists... direct from the NIDS website, we learn (as if it weren't already obvious) that they "use a combination of high quality ex-law enforcement investigative teams with contract research involving nationally accredited laboratories in the veterinary...sciences to research anomalous phenomena." Ahh, the dog star always sounds in... with that mysterious growl.... From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Jun 27 20:41:23 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id UAA19043; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 20:39:54 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 20:39:54 -0700 From: Robin van Spaandonk To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Scott Little is very good at calorimetry Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 13:39:19 +1000 Organization: Improving Message-ID: References: <002801c0fe61$95c878c0$a7181ad8@oemcomputer> In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id UAA18988 Resent-Message-ID: <"M4_7i3.0.Qf4.9SgEx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43413 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: In reply to Mitchell Jones's message of Wed, 27 Jun 2001 20:32:38 -0500: [snip] >***{Um, no, it's not all rumor, and nothing I said was in the form of >innuendo. To be specific, it is not a rumor that the outfit in Nevada sent >their flying varistor to Earth Tech in Austin, 1500 miles away, of all >places. I picked up on the strangeness of that instantly when I read >Scott's report, even before I read the piece about Bigelow. And there have [snip] Perhaps someone has already mentioned this, but if so I have not seen it. Anyway, note that Hal Puthoff is chairman of the board of NIDS, according to their personnel info at: http://www.nidsci.org/personnel.html . Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Jun 27 20:42:50 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id UAA19856; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 20:42:32 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 20:42:32 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Sender: mjones pop.jump.net Message-Id: In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 22:39:21 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Mitchell Jones Subject: Re: Robert Bigelow Resent-Message-ID: <"PaPDB1.0.5s4.eUgEx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43414 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: >Hi All > >Seems the notion has been floated that Vort's own >Scott Little is a card carrying member of the shadowy illuminati >conspiracy; kindly embodied by one Robert Bigelow. > >A little web search would turn up quite >a bit of public domain knowledge, I suggest trying >so. Here's a sample, a backgrounder from the Fortean >folks... > >http://www.parascope.com/nb/articles/bigelow.htm > >Of course the man's web site is here. > >http://www.nidsci.org/ > >and I suppose what he feels in appropriate bio >info is here. > >http://www.nidsci.org/bios/bigelow.html > >read some of the speeches, the guy's certainly >a maverick. He's also pretty wealthy, based on >the other companies mentioned which are his holdings. > >Otherwise, he seems to be funding a lot of >strange stuff, know anybody else doing this? >For that I have great respect for the man. ***{Not so fast. Listen to this, from the NIDS website: "Because of the sensitive and confidential nature of NIDS' primary research topic, it is not our policy to comment on the sources or methods of obtaining research information. NIDS obtains and creates multiple databases in the fields of UFO research, abduction, and animal mutilation, and in doing so the identities and contact details of individuals are protected or redacted. Unless otherwise approved, NIDS never releases the names or identifying details of any UFO eyewitnesses, abductees, or in cases involving animal mutilations, ranchers. All individuals and consultants who work for NIDS sign a non-disclosure agreement. NIDS has physicians, psychologists, and professional scientists from government and university labs on its science advisory boardwho help in maintaining the highest ethical research principles." (See http://www.nidsci.org/ethics.html.) The potential of the above is rather obvious: facts about UFO's and related phenomena may simply disappear into the NIDS black hole, never to emerge again. In that case, eyewitnesses would be silenced by nondisclosure agreements, as would the psychologists, physicians, and professional scientists who were given access to those eyewitnesses, or to artifacts, or to any other hard data which might permit the public to comprehend the outlines of the UFO phenomenon. Even the locations of ranches or other properties where such events occurred could, by means of the above "confidentiality" policy, be permanently removed from the public record--which means: independent investigators who refuse to be muzzled could be denied access to the information they need to blow the lid off of these events. It would appear that if we define the "Men in Black" as a shadowy organization which aims to suppress the evidence of extraterrestrial visitations, then it is hard to not notice that the organizations involved in sweeping UFO facts under the rug of Bigelow's "confidentiality" policies fit that description to a T. Sure, you can argue that we should just trust that Bigelow will eventually release this information. However, if he intends to do that, then what is the point of muzzling people in the first place? Bottom line: to me, it looks like Robert Boylan hit the nail on the head. --Mitchell Jones}*** He seems >pretty desperate to get out into space as well. I >suppose if I had a warp engine and needed to >commercialize it I'd know who to talk to (smile). ***{So you think turning it over to the MIB would be the way to go, right? :-) --MJ}*** >K. ________________ Quote of the month: "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value--i.e., zero." --Voltaire From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Jun 27 21:12:49 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id VAA32677; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 21:12:02 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 21:12:02 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Sender: mjones pop.jump.net Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: <002801c0fe61$95c878c0$a7181ad8 oemcomputer> Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 23:09:20 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Mitchell Jones Subject: Re: Scott Little is very good at calorimetry Resent-Message-ID: <"zRs7u3.0.U-7.HwgEx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43415 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: >In reply to Mitchell Jones's message of Wed, 27 Jun 2001 20:32:38 >-0500: >[snip] >>***{Um, no, it's not all rumor, and nothing I said was in the form of >>innuendo. To be specific, it is not a rumor that the outfit in Nevada sent >>their flying varistor to Earth Tech in Austin, 1500 miles away, of all >>places. I picked up on the strangeness of that instantly when I read >>Scott's report, even before I read the piece about Bigelow. And there have >[snip] >Perhaps someone has already mentioned this, but if so I have not seen >it. Anyway, note that Hal Puthoff is chairman of the board of NIDS, >according to their personnel info at: >http://www.nidsci.org/personnel.html ***{Wow, another chilling fact! Thanks, Robin! --MJ}*** >Regards, > >Robin van Spaandonk > >http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ ________________ Quote of the month: "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value--i.e., zero." --Voltaire From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Jun 27 21:31:13 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id VAA08465; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 21:30:48 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 21:30:48 -0700 Reply-To: From: "Keith Nagel" To: Subject: RE: Scott Little is very good at calorimetry Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 00:37:06 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal Resent-Message-ID: <"2busv1.0.B42.uBhEx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43416 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Yes Mitchell, it's true... Remember, several of our agents died to obtain that piece of information, so keep it on the QT OK? K. -----Original Message----- From: Mitchell Jones [mailto:mjones jump.net] Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2001 12:09 AM To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Scott Little is very good at calorimetry >In reply to Mitchell Jones's message of Wed, 27 Jun 2001 20:32:38 >-0500: >[snip] >>***{Um, no, it's not all rumor, and nothing I said was in the form of >>innuendo. To be specific, it is not a rumor that the outfit in Nevada sent >>their flying varistor to Earth Tech in Austin, 1500 miles away, of all >>places. I picked up on the strangeness of that instantly when I read >>Scott's report, even before I read the piece about Bigelow. And there have >[snip] >Perhaps someone has already mentioned this, but if so I have not seen >it. Anyway, note that Hal Puthoff is chairman of the board of NIDS, >according to their personnel info at: >http://www.nidsci.org/personnel.html ***{Wow, another chilling fact! Thanks, Robin! --MJ}*** >Regards, > >Robin van Spaandonk > >http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ ________________ Quote of the month: "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value--i.e., zero." --Voltaire From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Jun 27 23:47:45 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id XAA16256; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 23:46:49 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 23:46:49 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: rick mail.highsurf.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: <002801c0fe61$95c878c0$a7181ad8 oemcomputer> Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 20:46:35 -1000 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Rick Monteverde Subject: Re: Scott Little is very good at calorimetry Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Resent-Message-ID: <"dIk1d.0.pz3.NBjEx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43417 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Mitchell - >>It's all rumor and innuendo! > >***{Um, no, it's not all rumor, and nothing I said was in the form of >innuendo. Not *all* rumor? Ok, your example of that is valid. not *all* of the statements were rumor. But look up "innuendo" in the dictionary. You'll probably see the following used as an example. If not, you should submit it, and maybe you'll get some sort of credit: >***{I have perceived in Scott, on occasion, hints of what Ayn Rand used to >describe as "hatred of the good for being the good." Those hints, coupled >with these recent revelations about Bigelow, plus the various tidbits >posted here in the past concerning Hal Puthoff's CIA background, just fit >together a bit too neatly for me to ignore. You, of course, are free to >ignore them if you like. --MJ}*** - Rick Monteverde Honolulu, HI From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Jun 28 00:13:46 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx2.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id AAA02922; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 00:11:43 -0700 (PDT) Resent-Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 00:11:43 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: rick mail.highsurf.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: <002801c0fe61$95c878c0$a7181ad8 oemcomputer> Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 21:10:11 -1000 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Rick Monteverde Subject: Re: Scott Little is very good at calorimetry Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Resent-Message-ID: <"3Czro3.0.Tj.iYjEx" mx2> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43418 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: In keeping with the current theme, here's further proof that Scott Little is an MIB: http://www.nidsci.org/articles/pdf/triangularcraft_addendum.pdf Note where the tightest cluster of flying triangle sightings are found - you guessed it - "Scott" Air Force Base. Could this be mere coincidence? I think not!!! - Rick Monteverde Honolulu, HI From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Jun 28 01:21:06 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id BAA06611; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 01:20:19 -0700 Resent-Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 01:20:19 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: <01062611414700.03429 linux> <01062611414700.03429@linux> Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 03:19:47 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: thomas malloy Subject: Re: The Green Nazis Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Resent-Message-ID: <"_VCvd1.0.Dd1.3ZkEx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43419 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: > > >That depends on wether Mitchell or I am correct about the existance >>of a creator G-d with a right to rule the Universe. > >***{There is no "right to rule," Thomas. There is only the power to rule, That depends on whether there is a G-d. creator of the Universe. As it happens, he claims the title of King of the Universe. AFAIK, life is impossible outside of this biosystem. NASA has spent lots of our tax dollars attempting to grow plants in orbit, and, AFAIK, they have been unsuccessful. Astronauts who go on long term space trips have to be carried off in stretchers because their bones decalcify. Let alone the problem of a woman conceiving and carrying a child to full term in the radiation filled environment of space. >Slavery is >not a good thing, regardless of whether it takes place in "Heaven" or on >Earth. --MJ}*** He wants us to serve him because we love him, not because we are slaves. However, he makes it plain in his writings that he has no respect for human wisdom. > >>>All those 'ism's' get in the way of understanding by forcing a two >>>dimensional view of the universe through a screen of pigeonholes. >> >>Progress, OMHO is made when you view the Universe through the "lense" > >of your particular paradigm. Mitchell, based on what you've said, you believe the the world condensed out of a dust cloud and that life is a biochemical phenomena which began spontaneously. This, IMHO, is a probable at a tornado hitting a scrap yard and a 747 flying out. I believe that life is not a chemical phenomena, it is an energetic phenomena. the biochemical mechanism is surrounded, permeated, and controlled, by an energy field. This energy field is quite unlike any that we know of. If you understand the nature of this field, please enlighten me! You have noticed, I assume, Robert Parks attacks on homeopathy, reike and acupuncture? These healing regimens are energy medicine. There is none of the toxic phytochemicals left in the homeopathic remedy, just the plant's energy. Park dismisses energy medicine as quackery. He attributes the cures which these regimens produce to the placebo effect, and I can't prove otherwise. IMHO, Park has the same misguided opinion as to the nature of life as you do. > >***{No, progress is made by those who adjust their paradigms to fit the >facts. --MJ}*** Wrong! When your paradigm fails to fit the observed facts, you go looking for a paradigm which does fit the facts. That's what leads to breakthroughs, IMHO. > >Based on that paradigm you either >>notice, or fail to notice things, aspects, which either conflict or > >are predicted by your pet paradigm. > >What is sure, however, is that "pet" >paradigms should not be maintained. --MJ}*** > I disagree, pet paradigms are part of wisdom > > >>OTOH, with out classification, there would be no science or >>understanding of the Universe > >***{True, but continuous adjustments in one's classifications are also necessary, in response to the discovery of new facts--e.g., sometimes you >OTOH, sometimes it's necessary to look at an entirely diferent paradigm. > > >>Standing Bear > > >>Hum, I think most the dimwits are watching daytime TV. > >***{I don't think there are any dimwits in this group. There are, however, I agree. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Jun 28 03:07:09 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id DAA01928; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 03:05:42 -0700 Resent-Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 03:05:42 -0700 From: dtmiller midiowa.net (Dean T. Miller) To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Scott Little is very good at calorimetry Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 10:05:35 GMT Organization: Miller and Associates Message-ID: <3b430160.38766002 mail.midiowa.net> References: <002801c0fe61$95c878c0$a7181ad8@oemcomputer> In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.5/32.452 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id DAA01912 Resent-Message-ID: <"uzL9c3.0.2U.r5mEx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43420 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: On Wed, 27 Jun 2001 21:10:11 -1000, Rick Monteverde wrote: >In keeping with the current theme, here's further proof that Scott >Little is an MIB: > >http://www.nidsci.org/articles/pdf/triangularcraft_addendum.pdf > >Note where the tightest cluster of flying triangle sightings are >found - you guessed it - "Scott" Air Force Base. Could this be mere >coincidence? I think not!!! ROFL -- Dean -- from (almost) Des Moines -- KB0ZDF From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Jun 28 03:11:37 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id DAA02664; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 03:10:53 -0700 Resent-Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 03:10:53 -0700 From: dtmiller midiowa.net (Dean T. Miller) To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Scott Little is very good at calorimetry Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 10:10:46 GMT Organization: Miller and Associates Message-ID: <3b4401db.38888969 mail.midiowa.net> References: <002801c0fe61$95c878c0$a7181ad8@oemcomputer> In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.5/32.452 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id DAA02644 Resent-Message-ID: <"z7n6p3.0.Yf.jAmEx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43421 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: On Wed, 27 Jun 2001 20:32:38 -0500, Mitchell Jones wrote: >And there have >been many posts to this group over the years referring to Hal Puthoff's >supposed role in sub-rosa e.s.p. research for the government. That's not >rumor either, or, if it is, it is rumor that he has had ample opportunity >to deny and has neglected to do so. Certainly not rumor, and certainly not sub-rosa. Hal and his collaborator, physicist Russell Targ, co-authored a book on their research in the early 80's (I had the book, and recall the title being something like "Mind Reach."). -- Dean -- from (almost) Des Moines -- KB0ZDF From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Jun 28 08:56:12 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id IAA05926; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 08:54:51 -0700 Resent-Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 08:54:51 -0700 Message-ID: <001c01c0ffe0$0d7e1da0$f0181ad8 oemcomputer> From: "Bruce Meland" To: Subject: Re: neutrino energy source Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 07:38:41 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1 X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Resent-Message-ID: <"cRMbQ2.0.SS1.ADrEx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43422 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Yes; If a box the size of a briegcase will run an airconditioner then it will certainly heat water. -----Original Message----- From: thomas malloy To: vortex-l eskimo.com Date: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 12:18 AM Subject: neutrino energy source >> The devices range from perhaps switching devices >>tuned to frequencies higher than light, counter rotating disks that entrain >>high frequenciey particles and waves and convert them to electricity. Stay >>tuned, at very high frequencies, that is. Bruce >>--- >> > > >But does it heat water? > > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Jun 28 09:19:28 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id JAA16757; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 09:18:39 -0700 Resent-Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 09:18:39 -0700 Message-ID: <000101c0ffe3$5e3a1de0$9f181ad8 oemcomputer> From: "Bruce Meland" To: Subject: Fw: ELECTRIFYING PLASMASPHERE Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 07:54:40 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1 X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Resent-Message-ID: <"ZpkIr.0.k54.TZrEx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43423 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: A little more info about energy in and from space. Bruce - >CLUSTER'S WHISPERS PROBE ELECTRIFYING PLASMASPHERE >-------------------------------------------------- >An astronaut who exits a spacecraft without a spacesuit will die very >quickly because there is no air to breathe. However, although space >is often regarded as an airless vacuum, it is by no means empty. >Spacecraft such as Cluster are built to detect and study the sparse >'soup' of electrified plasma that populates near-Earth space. > > http://spaceflightnow.com/news/n0106/27cluster2 > >Cluster's whispers probe the electrifying plasmasphere >EUROPEAN SPACE AGENCY SCIENCE RELEASE >Posted: June 27, 2001 > >An astronaut who exits a spacecraft without a spacesuit will die very >quickly because there is no air to breathe. However, although space is often >regarded as an airless vacuum, it is by no means empty. Spacecraft such as >Cluster are built to detect and study the sparse 'soup' of electrified >plasma - mostly electrons and protons - that populates near-Earth space. > >"The world around us is made mainly of solids, liquids and gases," explained >Cluster project scientist Philippe Escoubet. "Plasma is none of these - it >is really a fourth state of matter. It behaves very much like a gas, but it >can conduct electricity and it can be affected by magnetic fields." > >"We find plasma in the Sun and stars - in fact, all over the Universe - so >it is very important to find out as much as we can about it," he said. > > >The four Cluster spacecraft were travelling northward along their orbit >(dashed line) and successively crossed the plasmasphere (orange region) at >around 30-60 minute intervals. Photo: ESA > > >Although plasma is observed across billions of light years of space, this >form of matter rarely occurs naturally on the Earth - with the exceptions of >lightning flashes and auroras (polar lights) in the upper atmosphere. >However, plasmas can also be created by applying an electric field to a >low-pressure gas, for example in neon or fluorescent tubes used in offices >and houses, or by heating a gas to very high temperatures. > >The Cluster spacecraft measure plasma in many different regions within the >magnetosphere - the magnetic bubble that surrounds our planet. However, the >highest density of electrically charged particles is found in the >plasmasphere - a doughnut-shaped region that lies between the Earth's two >magnetic poles. > >The inner edge of the doughnut starts about 1000 km above the surface, while >its outer limit may be at an altitude of 25,000 - 40,000 km, depending how >much it is being influenced by solar wind activity. > >As the four Cluster spacecraft approach the Earth every 57 hours, >instruments on board are able to study the particles, electric and magnetic >fields in the plasmasphere. Such measurements can tell scientists a great >deal about the behaviour of the high density, cold plasma it contains. > >One of the experiments on Cluster that is used to study plasma is called >WHISPER. This French-led instrument measures electron density as the >spinning spacecraft sweep around the planet. > >When the Cluster quartet are strung out like a string of beads near closest >approach to the Earth, they are sufficiently far apart to reveal the size of >the plasmasphere and study the particles within it. > >One of the first opportunities to observe the plasma doughnut came on 17 May >2001. With the Cluster quartet approximately 16,000 km apart, the WHISPER >instrument on each satellite was able to record changes in electron density >as the spacecraft soared over the south magnetic pole and headed north. > >"Our data clearly show the plasma frequency rising and decreasing as the >Cluster spacecraft enter and exit the region of high electron density," said >WHISPER co-investigator Patrick Canu of CETP in Velizy, France. "We can see >a clear difference in the inbound and outbound timing for each spacecraft." > >"There are also significant differences in the profile of the plasma >frequency line for each pass," he said, "the most noticeable one being the >'shoulder' seen by Samba around 23:00 UT." > >First to enter the plasmasphere (at around 19:30 UT or 20:30 CEST) was the >Rumba spacecraft, followed over the next one and a half hours by Salsa, >Tango and Samba. Each in turn detected the tell-tale rise in high frequency >electrons (shown by the wiggly pale blue line on the data plots). In each >case, the electric field measurements rose off the scale, indicating that >the electron count was exceeding 100 particles per cubic centimetre. > >After spending approximately 90 minutes within the plasmasphere, WHISPER's >electric field measurements began to plummet - clear evidence that the >spacecraft were speeding out of the dense plasma and back into a region of >the magnetosphere where the electron density was much lower. The Rumba >spacecraft exited the plasmasphere at around 21:30 UT. Last to cross the >outer boundary of the plasma doughnut was Samba (at around 23:30 UT). > >"These results are the most detailed ever to show changes in the >plasmasphere over time," said Philippe Escoubet. > >"This is yet another example of how Cluster is revolutionising our >understanding of near-Earth space and the way our planet interacts with the >Sun," he added. > > > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Jun 28 10:12:08 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id KAA10466; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 10:11:14 -0700 Resent-Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 10:11:14 -0700 Message-ID: <003f01c0ffea$a60a58e0$9f181ad8 oemcomputer> From: "Bruce Meland" To: Subject: Re: Enron market value falls by half Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 08:54:41 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Resent-Message-ID: <"tx37F2.0.MZ2.oKsEx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43424 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: The main concern about rolling blackouts in California this summer is the fact that they depend on our Northwest Hydro Power in the summer. We usually have a lot of surplus power in the summer from snow melt through the large Columbia River Dams. We don't have that much need for air conditioning here in the summer and our heating and lighting demands are low. Well this year we had a drouth with 50% normal snow pack. That is why California is concerned. But lately we have been getting a lot of rain up here which could help California. By the way the average Oregonian and Washingtonian consumes twice the amout of electricity as a Californian because rates are about half up here. Bruce -----Original Message----- From: Robin van Spaandonk To: vortex-l eskimo.com Date: Friday, June 22, 2001 5:40 PM Subject: Re: Enron market value falls by half >In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Fri, 22 Jun 2001 11:43:50 -0400: >[snip] >>electricity in the next few years. California power consumption has dropped >>11% compared to this time last year, so I cannot understand why the >>"crisis" continues, and why the power companies still issue warnings that >>rolling blackouts may be needed. >[snip] >A large part of the drop in consumption is probably due to the rolling >blackouts, rather than due to any drop in demand. > > >Regards, > >Robin van Spaandonk > >http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ > > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Jun 28 10:27:38 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id KAA17340; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 10:27:08 -0700 Resent-Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 10:27:08 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Sender: mjones pop.jump.net Message-Id: Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 12:23:28 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Mitchell Jones Subject: Non-reasoned Responses Resent-Message-ID: <"ya8fU.0.rE4.gZsEx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43425 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: To Keith, Dean, and Rick: Sarcasm and demeaning laughter are the last resorts of the intellectually dishonest, and fool only the gullible. A reasoned response to the questions I have raised would require that you explain, for starters, why Bigelow gets UFO eyewitnesses and abductees to sign nondisclosure agreements before he will investigate their claims, why he requires that scientists sign similar agreements before he will grant them access to materials or witnesses, why he refuses to disclose locations where phenomena occurred, etc. Are you guys really so dense that you see no sinister implications, when a billionare has operatives fanning out over the country, stuffing cash in people's pockets who have witnessed strange phenomena, promising to investigate same *only* if they will refuse to talk to all other investigators? Are you really so stupid that you cannot comprehend the implicaitons--to wit: that the aforesaid billionare has positioned himself to make virtually all information about UFO's and alien visitations simply disappear, if he chooses to do so? Hey, the guy is a billionare, right? Therefore he must be a good guy, right? After all, we have it straight from God Almighty that he couldn't possibly be CIA connected, that he couldn't possibly receive his funding from CIA black ops sources, right? Indeed, we know for a flat-out, unarguable fact that the "Men in Black" do not exist, and that extraterrestrials are not visiting Earth, right? Duh! --Mitchell Jones ________________ Quote of the month: "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value--i.e., zero." --Voltaire From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Jun 28 10:55:00 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id KAA31929; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 10:54:06 -0700 Resent-Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 10:54:06 -0700 Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20010628131646.02abde78 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 13:53:54 -0400 To: vortex-L eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: Scott Little can do no harm Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <"TWxd41.0.ho7.xysEx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43426 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Mitchell Jones has proposed a hypothesis which would not have crossed my mind in a thousand years: That Scott Little is secretly working for the CIA or some other nefarious organization, and he is deliberately misrepresenting his results, covering up excess heat. This cover up is supposedly hurting the field of cold fusion. That's where the idea breaks down. Suppose Little did publish false negative results. It would not cause any harm. It would not affect anyone's opinion of cold fusion or change funding levels. For that matter, were he to publish real excess heat results it would make no difference to anyone. Perhaps the people funding him would be pleased, and I hope they would increase his funding, but no one else in the world would take the slightest notice. Let's look at this for a moment. People like Richard Oriani and organizations like Mitsubishi publish iron-clad, indisputable proof that cold fusion exists, yet no one notices. Not a single skeptic is convinced. Scott Little is not even a professional scientist at a university or corporation. Who would listen to him? A few skeptics say he has credibility, but they do not mean it. If he were to publish a positive result, they would instantly turn against him and accuse him of fraud and insanity. The skeptics will praise an orangutan as long as it monkeys their views. Look at Taubes and Robert Park! Could fake negative reports by Little discourage funding to others? No, because there is not one penny of funding outside of SRI. Could fake negative reports discourage CF scientists, or cause them to question their own results? No, because they have plenty of negative results of their own. More than Scott Little, in fact -- Mizuno has six months of negative glow discharge data from hundreds of cathodes; Little gave up after a few dozen cathodes, I recall. The CF researchers know how difficult this is. They know Little spent a few weeks trying to replicate experiments that took them *years* to master. No CF scientist I know considers Little's work a credible, serious effort to replicate. They see it as an amateur experiment which might have worked if he had achieved the correct conditions by accident. He probably could not have repeated a succeed because he has not measured control parameters and material characteristics. Naturally, they do not hold it against him that he lacks four to six years of training in electrochemistry, and he does not have $200,000 in equipment. When the professionals at the NHE screwed up and wasted $20 million, and lied about the excess heat Miles showed them in their own lab, that hurt the reputation of the field. The DoE hot fusion web site gleefully quotes the Japanese hot fusion attacks on that fiasco. But Scott Little could lie all he wants and nobody on either side of the debate would notice or care. He has nothing to fear from success either. He has no academic standing; his job would not be at risk if he published excess heat results. All in all, I cannot think of any reason why he would lie, or any benefit it would bring him, and he seems like an honest fellow, so I assume he is telling the truth. - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Jun 28 10:57:57 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id KAA01082; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 10:57:23 -0700 Resent-Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 10:57:23 -0700 Message-ID: <00c801c0fff1$2a044ce0$9f181ad8 oemcomputer> From: "Bruce Meland" To: Subject: Re: Enron market value falls by half Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 09:41:19 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Resent-Message-ID: <"_CB1J.0.mG.10tEx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43427 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Enron makes more money as a middleman in electricity and gas. And as long as the Enron insiders sold their stock before it went down, who cares? So what if the deal with Blockbuster did not go through, they need tax write offs. Some say Enron created the Natural gas crisis also. Bruce -----Original Message----- From: Jed Rothwell To: vortex-L eskimo.com Date: Friday, June 22, 2001 8:45 AM Subject: Enron market value falls by half >Enron is a major player in the California energy crisis and it has close >connections to the Administration. Enron mainly produces electricity and >gas. It has one of the largest investments in U.S. wind power and wind >turbine manufacturing, but that is only a small percent of its energy >portfolio. Along with many other companies, it has lately lost a ton of >money trying to sell fiber optic bandwidth. The market value of the Enron >has fallen by half, to $30 billion, since peaking in August 2000. See: > >http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2001/06/22/BU178338.DTL > >http://www.wind.enron.com/ > >This is another indication that the California energy crisis will not >benefit energy companies in the long term. I predict a tremendous glut in >electricity in the next few years. California power consumption has dropped >11% compared to this time last year, so I cannot understand why the >"crisis" continues, and why the power companies still issue warnings that >rolling blackouts may be needed. > >- Jed > > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Jun 28 11:08:35 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id LAA05296; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 11:07:56 -0700 Resent-Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 11:07:56 -0700 Message-ID: <3B3B900C.4A67 bellsouth.net> Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 13:14:04 -0700 From: Terry Blanton X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01C-BLS20 (Win16; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Non-reasoned Responses References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"wu9Ul.0.DI1.s9tEx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43428 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Mitchell Jones wrote: > > To Keith, Dean, and Rick: > > Sarcasm and demeaning laughter are the last resorts of the intellectually > dishonest, and fool only the gullible. A reasoned response to the questions > I have raised would require that you explain, for starters, why Bigelow > gets UFO eyewitnesses and abductees to sign nondisclosure agreements before > he will investigate their claims, why he requires that scientists sign > similar agreements before he will grant them access to materials or > witnesses, why he refuses to disclose locations where phenomena occurred, > etc. Mitch, et.al., Many UFO researchers share your view on Bigelow. There was a big controversy last year on the UFO Updates list because John Carpenter sold his abductee database to RB without permission from those experiencers. You can start reading about it in the archives with this message: http://www.ufomind.com/ufo/updates/2000/jul/m06-001.shtml The row actually started earlier; but, this will give you a flavor for what those "in the know" think of NIDS. The messages go on for months. Terry From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Jun 28 11:19:25 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx2.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id LAA27410; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 11:15:32 -0700 (PDT) Resent-Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 11:15:32 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: rick mail.highsurf.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 08:08:48 -1000 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Rick Monteverde Subject: Re: Non-reasoned Responses Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Resent-Message-ID: <"SyNQT2.0._h6.zGtEx" mx2> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43429 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Mitchell - You call the rejection of rumor and innuendo as a viable basis for opinions about people and their integrity to be a "non-reasoned response"? Ok. Conversation over. - Rick Monteverde Honolulu, HI >To Keith, Dean, and Rick: > >Sarcasm and demeaning laughter are the last resorts of the intellectually >dishonest, and fool only the gullible. A reasoned response to the questions >I have raised would require that you explain, for starters, why Bigelow >gets UFO eyewitnesses and abductees to sign nondisclosure agreements before >he will investigate their claims, why he requires that scientists sign >similar agreements before he will grant them access to materials or >witnesses, why he refuses to disclose locations where phenomena occurred, >etc. Are you guys really so dense that you see no sinister implications, >when a billionare has operatives fanning out over the country, stuffing >cash in people's pockets who have witnessed strange phenomena, promising to >investigate same *only* if they will refuse to talk to all other >investigators? Are you really so stupid that you cannot comprehend the >implicaitons--to wit: that the aforesaid billionare has positioned himself >to make virtually all information about UFO's and alien visitations simply >disappear, if he chooses to do so? Hey, the guy is a billionare, right? >Therefore he must be a good guy, right? After all, we have it straight from >God Almighty that he couldn't possibly be CIA connected, that he couldn't >possibly receive his funding from CIA black ops sources, right? Indeed, we >know for a flat-out, unarguable fact that the "Men in Black" do not exist, >and that extraterrestrials are not visiting Earth, right? > >Duh! > >--Mitchell Jones >________________ >Quote of the month: > >"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value--i.e., zero." >--Voltaire From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Jun 28 11:37:53 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id LAA16796; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 11:36:50 -0700 Resent-Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 11:36:50 -0700 Reply-To: From: "Keith Nagel" To: Subject: RE: Non-reasoned Responses Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 14:43:05 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Importance: Normal Resent-Message-ID: <"rQhrH.0.J64.1btEx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43430 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: OK Mitchell.... The point of the NDA's is to protect UFO witnesses from being overrun by every nut-job, crack-pot and asshole who subsequently finds them out. Ask some of the public witnesses what it's like when they tell their stories. Jobs are lost, families break up, constant hounding by the black helicopter/MIB/second coming freaks, etc etc. That's why the policy is posted in the ETHIC'S section. It's what encourages credible witnesses to come forward. As far as his being tight-lipped, he's paying the bill Mitchell. Thats the essense of that free-market laisse-faire capitalism you seem so enamoured of. Or are you suggesting that the Government step in and force him to release research he's privately funded? K. -----Original Message----- From: Mitchell Jones [mailto:mjones jump.net] Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2001 1:23 PM To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Non-reasoned Responses To Keith, Dean, and Rick: Sarcasm and demeaning laughter are the last resorts of the intellectually dishonest, and fool only the gullible. A reasoned response to the questions I have raised would require that you explain, for starters, why Bigelow gets UFO eyewitnesses and abductees to sign nondisclosure agreements before he will investigate their claims, why he requires that scientists sign similar agreements before he will grant them access to materials or witnesses, why he refuses to disclose locations where phenomena occurred, etc. Are you guys really so dense that you see no sinister implications, when a billionare has operatives fanning out over the country, stuffing cash in people's pockets who have witnessed strange phenomena, promising to investigate same *only* if they will refuse to talk to all other investigators? Are you really so stupid that you cannot comprehend the implicaitons--to wit: that the aforesaid billionare has positioned himself to make virtually all information about UFO's and alien visitations simply disappear, if he chooses to do so? Hey, the guy is a billionare, right? Therefore he must be a good guy, right? After all, we have it straight from God Almighty that he couldn't possibly be CIA connected, that he couldn't possibly receive his funding from CIA black ops sources, right? Indeed, we know for a flat-out, unarguable fact that the "Men in Black" do not exist, and that extraterrestrials are not visiting Earth, right? Duh! --Mitchell Jones ________________ Quote of the month: "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value--i.e., zero." --Voltaire From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Jun 28 13:28:26 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx2.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id NAA03793; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 13:02:02 -0700 (PDT) Resent-Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 13:02:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20010628154932.02abde78 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 16:01:52 -0400 To: vortex-L eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: Infamous Taubes quote Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <"BEH9M.0.9x.squEx" mx2> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43431 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: A The book by Gary Taubes, "Bad Science" if chock full of ludicrous errors. I scanned a particularly infamous example for a discussion elsewhere with Dieter Britz, who praised the book. Since I went to the trouble, let me copy the quote here. This is from page 271. It is about a video Martin Fleischmann made: ". . . The video showed an effervescent cold fusion cell into which a red dye was poured. Within twenty seconds the dye had been evenly distributed throughout the flask. Fleischmann said this proved that 'the argument of ineffective mixing doesn't hold water.' The demonstration was impressive; however, it was bogus. Even if the cold fusion cell had huge temperature gradients - say, fifty degrees hotter on one side than on the other - the red dye would have diffused evenly within a very short time. The temperature gradient in the flasks simply had nothing to do with what could be called the red dye gradient. This also begged the question of why Pons and Fleischmann hadn't simply set up thermometers in a cell and collected the temperature data, which would have been less trouble and more convincing than the video. Later Dick Crooks of MIT suggested that the video might have been a product of Fleischmann's peculiar sense of humor. 'It's very common in science,' he said. 'When you don't have the results, you start telling jokes.'" Here are the major errors in this paragraph: 1. It is possible to have temperature gradient of 50 degrees C. This is like saying you might sip a cup of coffee from the right side and find it tepid, but when you turn the cup around and drink from the left side, it will be steaming hot. 2. The fluid might mix rapidly, yet the gradient magically remains. 3. Thermal gradients are from side to side, not top to bottom. 4. Fleischmann conducted four years of calorimetry but he never used a thermometer, or multiple thermometers. It is astonishing that professional scientists such as Dieter Britz, Leon Lederman, and Burton Richter read this book and yet you failed to notice these mistakes. In a sense Taubes performed a public service. His book is a good litmus test. A scientist who reads through it and fails to notice these errors has lost all objectivity, fair play, and respect for academic traditions. He no longer understands the common sense physics and chemistry. He judgment cannot be trusted, and nothing he says about cold fusion has any merit. He may still be rational about other subjects. The human mind can compartmentalize experience and facts, making sense out of some while it is blind to others. - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Jun 28 14:32:18 2001 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id OAA09173; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 14:31:45 -0700 Resent-Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 14:31:45 -0700 From: dtmiller midiowa.net (Dean T. Miller) To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Non-reasoned Responses Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 21:31:36 GMT Organization: Miller and Associates Message-ID: <3b3da16d.79738888 mail.midiowa.net> References: In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.5/32.452 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id OAA09116 Resent-Message-ID: <"oimzD.0.3F2.09wEx" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/43432 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Hi Mitchell, On Thu, 28 Jun 2001 12:23:28 -0500, Mitchell Jones wrote: >To Keith, Dean, and Rick: > >Sarcasm and demeaning laughter are the last resorts of the intellectually >dishonest, and fool only the gullible. A reasoned response to the questions >I have raised would require that you explain, for starters, why Bigelow >gets UFO eyewitnesses and abductees to sign nondisclosure agreements before >he will investigate their claims, why he requires that scientists sign >similar agreements before he will grant them access to materials or >witnesses, why he refuses to disclose locations where phenomena occurred, >etc. Are you guys really so dense that you see no sinister implications, >when a billionare has operatives fanning out over the country, stuffing >cash in people's pockets who have witnessed strange phenomena, promising to >investigate same *only* if they will refuse to talk to all other >investigators? Hey, I agree with you on that point. But I saw no reason to write a message that said simply "Yup!" What concerns me more is that Art Bell seems to have switched over to Bigelow's camp instead of the UFO reporting center in Washington. More than that, it seems that police across the country are being given Bigelow's UFO site as the primary place to report sightings. -- Dean -- from (almost) Des Moines -- KB0ZDF