From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Thu Nov  1 01:39:57 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id BAA29987;
	Thu, 1 Nov 2001 01:37:24 -0800
Resent-Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 01:37:24 -0800
Message-ID: <004701c162b8$ef7f81e0$1d8e209a ggrf30j>
From: "Nick Palmer" <nick7 itl.net>
To: <vortex-l eskimo.com>
References: <18.14a2049f.2911ef8a aol.com>
Subject: Re: JCF3 Conference
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 09:38:11 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Resent-Message-ID: <"5nJPe3.0.PK7.JVHux" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45178
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

Frank Z - I was not pointing out any spelling error of Jed's (there are far
more "target rich" contributors if I DID want to take pot shots like that).
I was simply wondering what Transmutarion meant in the context of the other
"keywords" to the abstract which were, mostly, the name of elements
("Palladium, Cesium, Praseodymium, Transmutarion, photoelectron
spectroscopy"). Is it a neologism for the products of transmutation or what?

Nick Palmer

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Thu Nov  1 05:07:54 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id FAA25530;
	Thu, 1 Nov 2001 05:05:14 -0800
Resent-Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 05:05:14 -0800
Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20011101080012.00ab0348 pop.mindspring.com>
X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2001 08:05:11 -0500
To: vortex-l eskimo.com, <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
From: Jed Rothwell <jedrothwell infinite-energy.com>
Subject: Re: JCF3 Conference
In-Reply-To: <004701c162b8$ef7f81e0$1d8e209a ggrf30j>
References: <18.14a2049f.2911ef8a aol.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Resent-Message-ID: <"yWRkS1.0.pE6.AYKux" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45179
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

Nick Palmer wrote:

>Frank Z - I was not pointing out any spelling error of Jed's (there are 
>far more "target rich" contributors if I DID want to take pot shots like 
>that). I was simply wondering what Transmutarion meant in the context of 
>the other "keywords" . . .

That was a spelling error. It wasn't my error, actually. I copied it 
directly from the Acrobat format file of Abstracts. I am a little surprised 
the people at Mitsubishi did not catch it.

My own spelling is atrocious. If it were not for the spell check feature, I 
would look like a half-literate 7th grade kid posting messages. One of the 
more sublime moments in my life was when I finished programming the first 
word processor with a spell check program that I ever saw or used. (Data 
General provided me with a list of 110,000 correctly spelled words.) For 
me, word processing has only marginally improved since then.

- Jed

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Thu Nov  1 08:43:34 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id IAA27353;
	Thu, 1 Nov 2001 08:40:43 -0800
Resent-Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 08:40:43 -0800
Message-ID: <3BE17BCE.6BF11279 bellsouth.net>
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2001 11:43:58 -0500
From: Terry Blanton <commengr bellsouth.net>
Organization: .
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Djinn Energy
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Resent-Message-ID: <"gry5v.0.Ih6.AiNux" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45180
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: RO
X-Status: 

From:

http://www.fas.org/sgp/news/secrecy/2001/10/102901.html

DJINN ENERGY

A leading Pakistani nuclear scientist who was questioned by the
Pakistani government last week concerning his ties to the Taliban
is known as a proponent of "Islamic science," a weird hybrid of
scientific terminology and Islamic lore.

Sultan Bashiruddin Mehmood is a pioneer in the development of
nuclear technology in Pakistan. But in 1980, as a senior director
of the Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission, he "recommended that
djinns [or genies], being fiery creatures, ought to be tapped as
a free source of energy. By this means, a final solution to
Pakistan's energy problems would be found."

This episode was recounted by Pakistani physicist Pervez Hoodbhoy
in his enlightening book "Islam and Science: Religious Orthodoxy
and the Battle for Rationality" (Zed Books, 1991). 

In a Wall Street Journal article on Islamic science (13 September
1988), Dr. Mehmood noted that King Solomon had harnessed energy
from djinns. "I think that if we develop our souls we can develop
communications with them," he said.

While the notion of "djinn energy" is ridiculous -- even in
Pakistan there are no djinn engines -- ridicule is beside the
point. A more important point is that influential figures in the
Islamic world are devoted to a view of reality that cannot be
readily reconciled with conventional Western thought. This is a
"translation" problem that cannot be solved with dictionaries.

The detention of Bashiruddin Mehmood, which is expected to be
temporary, was reported in the Pakistan Observer in Islamabad on
October 25. See "Nuclear Scientists Picked [Up] By Agencies":

http://pakobservercom.readyhosting.com/old/october/25/main.htm

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Thu Nov  1 10:16:33 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id KAA09548;
	Thu, 1 Nov 2001 10:13:27 -0800
Resent-Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 10:13:27 -0800
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20011101130618.00ab09e8 pop.mindspring.com>
X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2001 13:13:25 -0500
To: vortex-l eskimo.com, vortex-l@eskimo.com
From: Jed Rothwell <jedrothwell infinite-energy.com>
Subject: Re: Djinn Energy
In-Reply-To: <3BE17BCE.6BF11279 bellsouth.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id KAA09519
Resent-Message-ID: <"h619b1.0.6L2.73Pux" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45181
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

Here is some other jolly energy news from Pakistan about Sultan Bashiruddin 
Mehmood (also spelled Mahmood). He is suspected of conspiring to put 
nuclear weapons into the hands of the Taliban. See:

http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/01/international/asia/01STAN.html

New York Times

November 1, 2001

NUCLEAR FEARS

Pakistan Atom Experts Held Amid Fear of Leaked Secrets
By JOHN F. BURNS

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan, Oct. 31 — Pakistan has arrested three of the country's 
leading nuclear scientists and held them for questioning for most of the 
last week in connection with American concerns that nuclear weapons 
technology could have found its way into the hands of Osama bin Laden and 
the Taliban rulers of Afghanistan, officials in Pakistan said today.

They provided no details, and would not say whether they had turned up 
information to confirm American concerns. . . .

The Pakistani officials confirmed that one man who has been questioned is 
Sultan Bashiruddin Mahmood, a former top official of Pakistan's Atomic 
Energy Commission who has been identified in Pakistani newspapers as having 
been involved in the development of the atomic bombs Pakistan tested in its 
western desert in May 1998 after similar tests by India earlier that month.

The other arrested men were identified as Mirza Yusuf Baig and Abdul 
Majeed, also senior scientists with the Atomic Energy Commission. Dr. 
Majeed was said to have retired from the commission, while Dr. Baig's 
status was unclear. . . .


Western intelligence officials said they had indications that Mr. bin Laden 
had made unsuccessful attempts to procure fissionable materials for nuclear 
weapons beginning at about the time of Pakistan's nuclear tests.
Publicly, officials on General Musharraf's staff have played down the case, 
saying that the three men had nothing to do with nuclear weapons.
Dr. Mahmood retired from government service in 1998, Maj. Gen. Rashid 
Qureshi, the spokesman for General Musharraf, said at a daily Foreign 
Ministry briefing for reporters on Tuesday. He said Dr. Mahmood had been 
operating a nongovernmental organization and in the course of his duties 
had traveled to Afghanistan.

He added: "There were certain questions that needed to be asked and those 
have been asked. The report about his handing over to the C.I.A. or F.B.I. 
or any other agency is absolutely incorrect and false. Presently, he is not 
under arrest at all and he is in hospital."

But members of the scientists' families denied today that the men had been 
released, saying they had no access to them and demanding that the 
government tell the truth about the arrests. "Speaking lies on such a 
sensitive issue is not going to serve any purpose," the wives of the 
scientists declared.

Other Pakistani officials said that the case was sensitive and that 
official denials should not be taken at face value. "What other nuclear 
program does Pakistan have, other than a nuclear weapons program?" one 
official said.

The official recalled receiving instructions in the mid-1990's to deny, in 
official contacts with American officials, that Pakistan was developing 
nuclear weapons, at a time when the country already had assembled nuclear 
bombs. "It's just one of those things you can't be absolutely 
straightforward about," he said. . . . .

American officials flew to Pakistan to discuss ways of preventing 
Pakistan's small arsenal of nuclear weapons, said to number fewer than 20, 
from falling into the hands of extremists if the government was toppled by 
Islamic militants within the army.

. . . In their appeal today to General Musharraf, the wives of the 
scientists said Dr. Mahmood, the most senior of the three, had a heart 
attack on Tuesday while undergoing "intensive inhuman interrogation."

"As you are aware, they are eminent nuclear scientists who have served this 
country to the best of their abilities," the letter to General Musharraf 
said. "They do not have any association with any terrorist or anti-Pakistan 
organization." 

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Thu Nov  1 10:43:48 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id KAA26326;
	Thu, 1 Nov 2001 10:41:11 -0800
Resent-Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 10:41:11 -0800
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20011101131534.02cca0e8 pop.mindspring.com>
X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2001 13:41:07 -0500
To: vortex-l eskimo.com, vortex-l@eskimo.com
From: Jed Rothwell <jedrothwell infinite-energy.com>
Subject: Re: Djinn Energy
In-Reply-To: <3BE17BCE.6BF11279 bellsouth.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Resent-Message-ID: <"N_4dH.0.9R6.6TPux" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45182
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

Terry Blanton quotes:

>While the notion of "djinn energy" is ridiculous -- even in
>Pakistan there are no djinn engines -- ridicule is beside the
>point. A more important point is that influential figures in the
>Islamic world are devoted to a view of reality that cannot be
>readily reconciled with conventional Western thought. This is a
>"translation" problem that cannot be solved with dictionaries.

Actually, there are many people in the West devoted to views of reality 
that cannot be reconciled with traditional, conventional Western thought, 
starting with the scientists at the DoE who deny that cold fusion exists. 
Perhaps there are more anti-science fanatics in the Islamic world, but we 
enough in the U.S. to gum up the works and derail academic freedom.

I think one lesson of the CF debacle has been that is it easy to crush 
innovation. Only a small number of people in each generation contribute 
meaningful, major progress. Most scientists and engineers merely follow up 
on the great innovations made by the few. Because there are so few, it is 
relatively easy to stop them. You toss Fleischmann and Pons out of the 
country, order Miles and few others to refrain from working on CF or 
talking about it, and in a few years the innovation dies. It takes only a 
small number of people to hold a society hostage to vicious, crazy ideas, 
and to sabotage progress.

This is true in academic research, politics, and society as a whole. Here 
in Atlanta and the rest of the south, I think most white citizens were 
decent, law abiding and peaceful during the years from 1850 to 1970, but 
they did favor slavery and later segregation. To enforce it, they gave 
tacit support to a small group of terrorists, who controlled the 
government, the press and society. People who wonder how the Taliban holds 
a nation in thrall need look no farther than the recent history of the 
Southeastern U.S. As Martin Luther King said, "We will have to repent in 
this generation not merely for the hateful words and actions of the bad 
people but for the appalling silence of the good people."

Other bad news from the U.S. includes passage of what I consider blatantly 
unconstitutional laws. I cannot imagine what is going through the minds of 
the legislators and the President. Once you pass laws allowing the 
government to snatch people off street and hold them indefinitely, even if 
you do it for what seems to be a good cause or because you are frightened, 
evil people rise to power and use those laws for nefarious purposes. Laws 
like that attract evil people, the way sugar attracts ants.

- Jed

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Thu Nov  1 12:32:33 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id MAA19208;
	Thu, 1 Nov 2001 12:29:24 -0800
Resent-Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 12:29:24 -0800
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20011101152358.02cc23b8 pop.mindspring.com>
X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2001 15:28:29 -0500
To: vortex-L eskimo.com
From: Jed Rothwell <jedrothwell infinite-energy.com>
Subject: WAY OFF TOPIC Christian Right Lobbies to Overturn
  Thermodynamics
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Resent-Message-ID: <"-WU2i2.0.2i4.a2Rux" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45183
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

Not really, but I got a good laugh out of it:

http://www.theonion.com/onion3631/christian_right_lobbies.html

I love the picture of the woman on the courthouse stairs carrying the sign, 
"I don't accept fundamental tenets of science, AND I VOTE."

- Jed

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Thu Nov  1 19:35:24 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id TAA07829;
	Thu, 1 Nov 2001 19:30:11 -0800
Resent-Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 19:30:11 -0800
X-Apparently-From: <cjford1 yahoo.com>
Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.20011101212755.00b13100 pop.mail.yahoo.com>
X-Sender: cjford1 pop.mail.yahoo.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58 
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2001 21:30:07 -0600
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
From: Charles Ford <cjford1 yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: WAY OFF TOPIC Christian Right Lobbies to Overturn
  Thermodynamics
Cc: lona Ford <LonaF swbell.net>
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20011101152358.02cc23b8 pop.mindspring.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Resent-Message-ID: <"9pPLh1.0.7w1.2DXux" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45184
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

At 03:28 PM 11/1/01 -0500, you wrote:
>Not really, but I got a good laugh out of it:
>
>http://www.theonion.com/onion3631/christian_right_lobbies.html
>
>I love the picture of the woman on the courthouse stairs carrying the 
>sign, "I don't accept fundamental tenets of science, AND I VOTE."
>
>- Jed

These Christian fundamentalists...  Next thing you know they will be 
lobbying to make dihydrogenmonoxide a controlled substance. :-)


_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free  yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Fri Nov  2 11:05:32 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id LAA11390;
	Fri, 2 Nov 2001 11:02:54 -0800
Resent-Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 11:02:54 -0800
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <a05100300b8089d1f3b29 [4.46.76.153]>
In-Reply-To: <77.1d4fffd9.29101084 aol.com>
References: <77.1d4fffd9.29101084 aol.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 13:02:46 -0600
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
From: thomas malloy <temalloy metro.lakes.com>
Subject: Interesting website
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
Resent-Message-ID: <"5jHlb1.0.jn2.Stkux" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45185
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: RO
X-Status: 

Len Horowitz, webmaster of www.tetrahedron.org has a new website 
which has some very interesting claims.Dr. Horowitz's prayer 
amplifier is said to utilize scalar waves, I'm going to get a PC 
computer working so that I can down load the trial version. See 
www.miracle6.com
-- 

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Fri Nov  2 12:49:11 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id MAA27878;
	Fri, 2 Nov 2001 12:46:21 -0800
Resent-Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 12:46:21 -0800
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20011102153918.00ab4750 pop.mindspring.com>
X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2001 15:44:03 -0500
To: vortex-L eskimo.com
From: Jed Rothwell <jedrothwell infinite-energy.com>
Subject: Loading Pd over 1.0
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id MAA27776
Resent-Message-ID: <"fu2mU.0.3p6.POmux" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45186
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

I have often heard it is impossible to load Pd with H or D to a ratio over 
1.0. In other words, you cannot cram in more hydrogen atoms than there are 
palladium atoms. So I was surprised to hear Celani claim that thin wire 
experiments at his lab, ENEA, SRI and Pirelli have demonstrated loading at 
higher levels, up to 1.5, and typically 1.2 to 1.3.

Cold fusion with palladium apparently depends upon high loading. For many 
years people have been trying to develop methods to load quickly, uniformly 
and reliably, that is, with good reproducibility.

I asked some electrochemists about this. Storms, Britz and McKubre informed 
me that such higher loading has been observed, but it is difficult to know 
how high the loading is actually going, because the standard methods of 
measuring loading may not work predictably above 1.0. McKubre wrote: “There 
is no fundamental reason why you cannot load Pd to 2 ( or even 3).  It 
either requires double occupancy of the Octahedral sites (as conjectured by 
no less than Linus Pauling and Julian Schwinger), or occupation of 
the  Tetrahedral sites, as was much conjectured by Giuliano Preparata 
(being  followed up now by Vittorio Violante), and others. There are 
published papers in the Russian literature at D/Pd = 1.33 from ion 
implantation.”

During his JCF3 lecture, Celani reported progress with the technique. He 
says it used to take two days to load up to 1.3, but now it has been done 
repeatedly in a much shorter time, with both H and D. The main problem is 
to keep the electrolyte clean. He said, “It is possible to load hydrogen up 
to 1.3 in one hour. When I [told] Fleischmann [about these results], last 
month, he thought it was impossible. Completely impossible. Or at least it 
would need three months.”

McKubre explained, “Resistance ratios that look like loadings of 1.1 (or 
more) can easily be obtained in very thin wires (less than 125 microns) in 
periods of only a few hours. The problem is a thermodynamic one, NOT 
diffusion times (which are only seconds or minutes in these structures).” 
He says ratios can be obtained, meaning that when you measure by the 
resistance method it looks as if the wire is highly loaded, but that may 
not be strictly true. He e-mailed me a paper about this:

Physics Letters A 276 (2000) 1­5

Temperature coefficient of resistivity at compositions
approaching PdH

P. Tripodi, M.C.H. McKubre, F.L.Tanzella, P.A. Honnor, D. Di Gioacchino, F. 
Celani, V. Violante

Here is the Abstract, which has quite a few Greek letters. I hope I have 
replaced them all correctly:

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Measurements have been made of the temperature coefficient of resistivity, 
lambda, versus hydrogen concentration, H/Pd, at very high concentrations in 
the Pd-H system. Unusually high hydrogen compositions were achieved using 
an electrochemical loading
procedure which allowed stable Pd­H systems to be obtained. It is well 
known that increasing the H/Pd concentrations leads to three different 
phases (alpha, alpha+beta, beta), respectively, in the Pd­H system; the 
beta phase is thought to end in an asymptotic limit. Possible evidence that 
a new phase (gamma) exists, bordering the beta phase at compositions H/Pd > 
0.9 is reported and discussed.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- Jed

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Fri Nov  2 15:41:21 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id PAA05151;
	Fri, 2 Nov 2001 15:38:45 -0800
Resent-Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 15:38:45 -0800
Message-ID: <3BE32114.27A03E77 ix.netcom.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2001 16:42:27 -0600
From: Edmund Storms <storms2 ix.netcom.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 (Macintosh; U; PPC)
X-Accept-Language: en,pdf
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Re: Loading Pd over 1.0
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20011102153918.00ab4750 pop.mindspring.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Resent-Message-ID: <"nd_4B1.0.PG1.5woux" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45187
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

Jed, I think it is important to make a clear distinction between measurements
of the average composition, which is determined by all of the methods, and the
actual composition of the surface region where the nuclear reactions actually
occur.  If the average composition is PdD>1.0 as I and others have achieved,
the surface composition must be greater and it must be a different phase from
the bulk material.  This conclusion is not a matter of debate, but based on
observation and thermodynamic principles.  This being the case, the average
composition has only an indirect relationship to the ability to initiate a
nuclear reaction, and is the reason why anomalous results appear to occur only
within a broad range of values for the average composition.  Not all samples
can achieve the necessary surface composition even though the average bulk
composition is high.  If this behavior were more clearly understood by people
working in the field, much less confusion would exist in trying to achieve
reproducibility and to understand the claims for high D/Pd ratios.

Ed

Jed Rothwell wrote:

> I have often heard it is impossible to load Pd with H or D to a ratio over
> 1.0. In other words, you cannot cram in more hydrogen atoms than there are
> palladium atoms. So I was surprised to hear Celani claim that thin wire
> experiments at his lab, ENEA, SRI and Pirelli have demonstrated loading at
> higher levels, up to 1.5, and typically 1.2 to 1.3.
>
> Cold fusion with palladium apparently depends upon high loading. For many
> years people have been trying to develop methods to load quickly, uniformly
> and reliably, that is, with good reproducibility.
>
> I asked some electrochemists about this. Storms, Britz and McKubre informed
> me that such higher loading has been observed, but it is difficult to know
> how high the loading is actually going, because the standard methods of
> measuring loading may not work predictably above 1.0. McKubre wrote: “There
> is no fundamental reason why you cannot load Pd to 2 ( or even 3).  It
> either requires double occupancy of the Octahedral sites (as conjectured by
> no less than Linus Pauling and Julian Schwinger), or occupation of
> the  Tetrahedral sites, as was much conjectured by Giuliano Preparata
> (being  followed up now by Vittorio Violante), and others. There are
> published papers in the Russian literature at D/Pd = 1.33 from ion
> implantation.”
>
> During his JCF3 lecture, Celani reported progress with the technique. He
> says it used to take two days to load up to 1.3, but now it has been done
> repeatedly in a much shorter time, with both H and D. The main problem is
> to keep the electrolyte clean. He said, “It is possible to load hydrogen up
> to 1.3 in one hour. When I [told] Fleischmann [about these results], last
> month, he thought it was impossible. Completely impossible. Or at least it
> would need three months.”
>
> McKubre explained, “Resistance ratios that look like loadings of 1.1 (or
> more) can easily be obtained in very thin wires (less than 125 microns) in
> periods of only a few hours. The problem is a thermodynamic one, NOT
> diffusion times (which are only seconds or minutes in these structures).”
> He says ratios can be obtained, meaning that when you measure by the
> resistance method it looks as if the wire is highly loaded, but that may
> not be strictly true. He e-mailed me a paper about this:
>
> Physics Letters A 276 (2000) 1?5
>
> Temperature coefficient of resistivity at compositions
> approaching PdH
>
> P. Tripodi, M.C.H. McKubre, F.L.Tanzella, P.A. Honnor, D. Di Gioacchino, F.
> Celani, V. Violante
>
> Here is the Abstract, which has quite a few Greek letters. I hope I have
> replaced them all correctly:
>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>
> Measurements have been made of the temperature coefficient of resistivity,
> lambda, versus hydrogen concentration, H/Pd, at very high concentrations in
> the Pd-H system. Unusually high hydrogen compositions were achieved using
> an electrochemical loading
> procedure which allowed stable Pd?H systems to be obtained. It is well
> known that increasing the H/Pd concentrations leads to three different
> phases (alpha, alpha+beta, beta), respectively, in the Pd?H system; the
> beta phase is thought to end in an asymptotic limit. Possible evidence that
> a new phase (gamma) exists, bordering the beta phase at compositions H/Pd >
> 0.9 is reported and discussed.
>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>
> - Jed

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Fri Nov  2 18:58:24 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id SAA26177;
	Fri, 2 Nov 2001 18:57:53 -0800
Resent-Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 18:57:53 -0800
Message-Id: <3.0.6.32.20011102215749.007afdf0 pop.mindspring.com>
X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.6 (32)
Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2001 21:57:49 -0500
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
From: Jed Rothwell <JedRothwell infinite-energy.com>
Subject: Re: Loading Pd over 1.0
In-Reply-To: <3BE32114.27A03E77 ix.netcom.com>
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20011102153918.00ab4750 pop.mindspring.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Resent-Message-ID: <"xOYxp2.0.tO6.mqrux" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45189
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

Edmund Storms wrote:

>Jed, I think it is important to make a clear distinction between measurements
>of the average composition, which is determined by all of the methods, and
the
>actual composition of the surface region where the nuclear reactions actually
>occur.  If the average composition is PdD>1.0 as I and others have achieved,
>the surface composition must be greater and it must be a different phase from
>the bulk material.

This is vital point, of course.

Until now I had the mistaken impression that people claiming a ratio close
to 1.0 were talking about the surface or near surface only, and the overall
average was somewhat below that, around 0.9. I did not realize that you and
others have actually measured an average at or above 1.0. In that case,
obviously the surface areas must have a concentration well above 1.

I wrote "cold fusion with palladium apparently depends upon high loading."
That may sound unreasonably cautious, given the mountain of evidence
correlating loading and heat, but I have had, and still have, a suspicion
that loading is not the real issue. What you want is a crowd of deuterons
dancing around near the surface, probably in some form of excitation. The
situation at lower levels, and average overall loading probably does not
matter. Otherwise, gas loaded cells would not produce measurable effects,
especially the Pd membranes at Mitsubishi. The deuterons must be well
spread out just below the surface of the membrane.


>within a broad range of values for the average composition.  Not all samples
>can achieve the necessary surface composition even though the average bulk
>composition is high.  If this behavior were more clearly understood by people
>working in the field, much less confusion would exist in trying to achieve
>reproducibility and to understand the claims for high D/Pd ratios.

Many things should be understood, but are not. Ignorance is the bane of
this field. The opposition is far more ignorant than the researchers, but
the researcher's does far greater harm, by wasting precious time and
funding. Three or four of the JCF presentations depressed me, because the
researchers had not read the literature, even the papers in Japanese by
Mizuno. One undergrad was trying to do a glow discharge experiment, with
the wrong anode-cathode geometry, the wrong voltage, the wrong temperature,
and several other mistakes. Mizuno took him aside later and explained the
technique. The fellow should have found these things out for himself. His
professor, Takahashi, should have paid more attention to the research and
suggested he confer with Ohmori and Mizuno.

- Jed

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Fri Nov  2 19:00:04 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id SAA25794;
	Fri, 2 Nov 2001 18:57:24 -0800
Resent-Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 18:57:24 -0800
Message-ID: <3BE35D1E.CCB13738 ix.netcom.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2001 18:57:34 -0800
From: Akira Kawasaki <aki ix.netcom.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en]C-CCK-MCD NSCPCD472  (Win95; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Vortex <vortex-l eskimo.com>
Subject: [Fwd: What's New for Nov 02, 2001]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Resent-Message-ID: <"BXier3.0.tI6.Jqrux" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45188
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: RO
X-Status: 



-------- Original Message --------
Subject: What's New for Nov 02, 2001
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 18:55:46 -0500 (EST)
From: "What's New" <whatsnew aps.org>
To: aki ix.netcom.com

WHAT'S NEW   Robert L. Park   Friday, 2 Nov 01   Washington, DC

1. CLIMATE TREATY: THE UNITED STATES IS SITTING ON THE BENCH.  In 
Morocco this week, the nations of the world are gathered to work
out the details of the Kyoto Protocol, requiring cuts in emission
of greenhouse gases. However, President Bush made it clear that
the nation that leads the world in climate research, and which
also happens to be the biggest producer of greenhouse emissions,
won't be part of any agreement that is reached.  Americans are
preoccupied by other events, and those opposing the Protocol,
including the President, insist that it treats industrialized
nations unfairly. Since the treaty can only take effect if
ratified by countries accounting for 55% of the 1990 greenhouse
emissions, any meaningful treaty is probably doomed. 

2. MISSILE DEFENSE: THE NMD STORY TAKES YET ANOTHER PLOT TWIST. 
Last week's "deal" unraveled (WN 26 Oct 01), but the Washington
Post and the New York Times now say the U.S. and Russia are close
to another deal.  Under this week's "deal"  Russia would permit
NMD tests, in return for which the U.S. would agree to stockpile
cuts and postpone a decision to abandon the 1972 ABM treaty. 
Perhaps Putin looked at the results of NMD tests thus far (WN 10
Jul 01), and decided such tests are unlikely to lead to a real
defense anyway.  Or maybe all these "deals" are weather balloons,
sent up to check on the climate for the summit that will begin on
13 Nov.  Stay tuned.  WN will continue to report these deals. 

3. LOOSE NUKES: CONGRESS CHOOSES PORK OVER NUCLEAR SAFEGUARDS.
Everyone in Washington is trying to guess what weapon terrorists
will unleash next.  Nuclear is high on the chart.  It needn't be
a bomb: widely-scattered radioactive material would effectively
spread panic in a society that already has an exaggerated fear of
all things radioactive.  But in approving a $25B energy and water
bill, $2B more than the President requested, Congress failed to
add money for programs to safeguard Russian nuclear stockpiles. 

4. NASA SPACEGUARD: HOW FAR SHOULD WE GO IN DETECTING ASTEROIDS? 
The NASA goal is to detect asteroids larger than 1 km diameter,
which is the lower limit for a global catastrophe.  As the size
of an asteroid goes down, however, detection costs go up.  We
will examine the implications more closely in the next issue. 

5. ISS: MANAGEMENT AND COST EVALUATION TASK FORCE REPORT.  You
will recall that the ISS is 4.8B over budget--down to a Mir-sized
crew of three--and has effectively scrapped its science programs. 
Major changes in how the ISS is managed are called for in the
Task Force report, which was released just minutes ago.  The
report also calls for additional funds to be made available from
the Human Space Flight budget.  Until now, cost overruns on the
ISS have been made up with funds taken from science programs

THE AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY and THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND. 
Opinions are the author's and are not necessarily shared by the
American Physical Society or the University, but they should be.

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Mon Nov  5 10:02:23 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id JAA17159;
	Mon, 5 Nov 2001 09:58:54 -0800
Resent-Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 09:58:54 -0800
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20011105121157.02e1f080 pop.mindspring.com>
X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2001 12:34:08 -0500
To: vortex-L eskimo.com
From: Jed Rothwell <jedrothwell infinite-energy.com>
Subject: OFF TOPIC Airport security joke
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Resent-Message-ID: <"q6Rg91.0.1C4.UDjvx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45190
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

Here is an item from CNN which sounds like a joke but it isn't:

http://www.cnn.com/2001/US/11/05/inv.ohare.security.breach/index.html

CHICAGO, Illinois (CNN) --A man who tried to board a United Airlines flight 
armed with nine knives, a can of Mace and a stun gun was re-arrested by the 
FBI, after being released earlier by local authorities, officials said 
Monday. . . .

CNN has learned of an apparent connection Gurung has with one of two men 
who were detained in Texas after the September 11 terrorist attacks.

Gurung listed the same West Hollywood Avenue apartment address in Chicago 
as Ayub Ali Khan, who is being held as a material witness in the September 
hijackings.

Khan and Mohamed Jaweed Azmath were arrested in Fort Worth, Texas, on 
September 12 on an Amtrak train heading to San Antonio. Found in their 
possession were $5,500 cash, two flat box-cutter type knives and hair dye. 
Azmath also had copies of numerous passport photos. . . .

- - - - - - - - - - - - -

This sort of thing does not inspire confidence in the Authorities and 
Experts who are appointed to Protect the Public. They look like a gang of 
Keystone Cops (from the slapstick silent movie era). I expect this is a 
false impression. Probably most of airport security people are competent 
professionals. I have great respect for the CDC investigators.

What this proves is that some experts are dolts. It only takes one dolt to 
cause great harm to a fragile, high tech system such as the air 
transportation network, a nuclear power plant, or -- in a sense -- the 
American Physical Society. These institutions skirt the brink of disaster 
every day. They depend upon good will, honesty, team effort and the 
diligence of experts. Unfortunately there is not much we can do about this 
fragility. Cold fusion would solve many of the problems in these three 
institutions, if it can be made practical and the political opposition can 
be overcome. It cannot fix the problems in other, similar fragile 
institutions, such as the stock market, education, public health, the 
crisis with antibiotics, and so on. I do not know where or how these 
problems can be fixed, but history shows that many previous catastrophic 
problems, which people thought might end civilization, were fixed. Some of 
them were turned out to be remarkably easy to repair, while others still 
threaten us.

Some of the best solutions turned out to be temporary. Fossil fuels gave us 
a brief opportunity, perhaps 200 or 300 years, to find something better. 
Antibiotics gave us 50 to 100 years respite from many dangerous infectious 
diseases in wealthy nations, but evolution and foolish abuse will soon put 
an end to this idyllic state of affairs. If we diligently research biology, 
spend huge sums of money, and we get lucky, we may find another temporary 
escape. If we fail, our children and grandchildren will once again live in 
mortal fear of tuberculoses, strep throat, pneumonia, the black plague, and 
other common diseases. Dozens of diseases will strike as inexorably as AIDS 
and cancer do today, killing millions of people of all ages, as they do in 
most countries even now. In 1968, a prominent health expert declared that 
the age of infectious disease was over. This was like saying that oil and 
natural gas will solve our energy needs forever, and everyone can afford a car.

Anyway, this is not the End of History after all. I prefer things this way. 
In a sense, I am glad to live in an era in which the human race might still 
destroy itself or wipe out the planet. I expect that over the next thousand 
years we will fix most of these problems, and build a society closer to 
Utopia, here on earth and on other planets. Things will be safe, but very 
dull. Ennui may then be our worst problem.

- Jed

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Mon Nov  5 10:52:14 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id KAA09883;
	Mon, 5 Nov 2001 10:44:26 -0800
Resent-Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 10:44:26 -0800
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20011105133535.02e1f080 pop.mindspring.com>
X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2001 13:44:28 -0500
To: vortex-L eskimo.com
From: Jed Rothwell <jedrothwell infinite-energy.com>
Subject: OFF TOPIC Filtering OFF TOPIC and other messages
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Resent-Message-ID: <"bjhuB.0.JQ2.9ujvx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45191
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

Someone wrote to me asking politely that I refrain from posting OFF TOPIC 
messages in Vortex. Actually, that last message was secretly on topic, my 
thesis being that fragility, lack of control, and lack of responsiveness at 
large institutions caused the crisis in cold fusion.

Anyway, I'd like to point out that the heading "OFF TOPIC" is an agreed 
upon protocol in Vortex. It applies to which are not humorous or venomous, 
which are supposed to go to Vortex-BL. More important, with any e-mail 
program written in the last five years, such as Eudora or Outlook, you can 
easily create a "filter" which will automatically delete messages with "OFF 
TOPIC" in the heading. You can even write a filter to delete "OFF TOPIC" 
messages coming from JedRothwell. I can advise how to do this with Eudora. 
I am not familiar with Outlook.

Many people do not realize that e-mail programs have this capability, 
because people are busy, and they do not have time to explore software 
features. I use filtering to delete spam, such as any message "From: <>" or 
"To: <Undisclosed Recipients>" Earthlink.com (formerly Mindspring) has 
pretty good built-in spam blocking at their server, but some does get through.

- Jed

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Mon Nov  5 11:45:39 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id LAA10784;
	Mon, 5 Nov 2001 11:42:50 -0800
Resent-Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 11:42:50 -0800
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20011105144111.03817778 pop.mindspring.com>
X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2001 14:42:51 -0500
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
From: Jed Rothwell <jedrothwell infinite-energy.com>
Subject: Re: OFF TOPIC Airport security joke
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20011105121157.02e1f080 pop.mindspring.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Resent-Message-ID: <"8z9Wz.0.Ke2.wkkvx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45192
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

This story is stranger with each telling. I suppose details will be in all 
the newspapers, but here is the latest version:

(CNN) -- Seven airport security workers have been suspended after police 
said a man made it through a security checkpoint at Chicago's O'Hare 
International Airport with knives, a can of Mace and a stun gun.

Security screeners took two knives from Subash Gurung, 27, after he 
initially went through the checkpoint Saturday night, authorities said. 
Gurung then was allowed to pass through. Seven more knives, Mace and a stun 
gun were found in his carry-on luggage during a random search before 
boarding a United Airlines flight, police said. . . .

- JR

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Mon Nov  5 13:34:38 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id NAA11298;
	Mon, 5 Nov 2001 13:30:25 -0800
Resent-Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 13:30:25 -0800
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20011105153857.02e16928 pop.mindspring.com>
X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2001 16:30:25 -0500
To: vortex-L eskimo.com
From: Jed Rothwell <jedrothwell infinite-energy.com>
Subject: Celani's comments at JCF3 / Hot fusion lobby address
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Resent-Message-ID: <"SV5lZ3.0.Sm2.mJmvx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45193
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

I reported earlier that Celani said there was a doctor working on the 
Ralstonia bioremediation project. Actually, he said there are physicists, 
"three biologists and three medical doctors." It is a remarkable eclectic 
interdisciplinary team. High government officials were very impressed by 
the reported results. The government is giving them a grant from 
discretionary funds immediately. If the results remain promising, this will 
lead to millions more in the near future. Celani says the government 
is  discussing a pilot project that will cost on the order of $200 million.

He said that in some of tests, they added toxic levels of mercury and other 
heavy metals to water. I am not sure how the process works, but I presume 
they grew Ralstonia in the water, then filter out the bacteria. That is 
more effective than trying to filter individual mercury atoms. The final 
product is "water clean enough to drink" according to Celani.

Ralstonia is a remarkably hardly bacteria. It metabolizes mercury or 
radioactive uranium. It can survive 30 mega-rads of radiation from a 
cobalt-60 source. Five hundred rads is enough to kill a person. (In 
medicine, the rem unit is often used instead of rad, r(oentgen) e(quivalent 
in) m(an), where 1 rem = 1 rad.)

As I mentioned Celani et al. have been working on the thin wire loading 
techniques for some time. He cited similar research at SRI and Pirelli, and 
SRI published a paper about last year in Physics Letters A. Celani said it 
used to take two days to load up to 1.3, but now it has been done 
repeatedly in a much shorter time, with both H and D. The main problem is 
to keep the electrolyte clean. He said, "It is possible to load hydrogen up 
to 1.3 in one hour." When he told Fleischmann about these results during a 
recent visit, he says Fleischmann thought it was impossible. "Or at least, 
it would need three months." McKubre thinks Celani may have misunderstood 
Fleischmann. He says it is well known that thin wires can load quickly. As 
I mentioned, he said:

"Resistance ratios that look like loadings of 1.1 (or more) can easily be 
obtained in very thin wires (less than 125 microns) in periods of only a 
few hours. The problem is a thermodynamic one, NOT diffusion times (which 
are only seconds or minutes in these structures)."

I wouldn't want to misquote Fleischmann, but I checked the audiotape, and 
that is what Celani says.

My audiotape quality is very poor, unfortunately. The conference room, on 
the university campus, had poor quality microphones and speakers. The 
organizers do not give much thought to electronic presentations.

I wish these JCF and ICCF conferences could be preserved on good quality 
streaming video available to anyone over the Internet. The more people who 
hear and see original source presentations, the better. The conference 
organizers are generally old men who have little interest or knowledge of 
the Internet, and no interest whatsoever in public opinion, or for that 
matter, the opinions of other researchers. That is the impression I got 
from F. Scaramuzzi's candid introduction to the ICCF8 Proceedings, and from 
my discussions with Scaramuzzi. Their attitude is both a strength and a 
weakness. A strength, because if they worried about what other people think 
they would have stopped years ago; and a weakness because they do not tell 
other people what they are doing. They assume that good quality research 
and being correct will eventually lead to recognition. I believe this is a 
textbook myth.

In other fields, people recognize the need to make their case and attract 
attention. Businessmen sometimes talk about a "product so good, it sells 
itself," but I doubt that an experienced businessman actually believes such 
a thing is possible. Some form of promotion or advertising is needed, 
because people do not hear about innovations by ESP. In many areas of 
science, such as hot fusion or cancer research, the pubic relations 
campaigns to sway the public and Congress costs quite a lot of money, and 
it is highly professional and polished. See:

Fusion Power Associates
2 Professional Drive, Suite 248
Gaithersburg, MD 20879
phone: (301) 258-0545
fax: (301) 975-9869
e-mail: fpa compuserve.com
web: http://fusionpower.org

(They used to have a nasty dig at cold fusion at this site, but I cannot 
find it.)

It is ironic that the hot fusion people accused CF researchers of promoting 
themselves, supposedly in violation of traditional ethics. Actually, self 
promotion and dazzling the public has been an essential part of science 
since Galileo.

The JCF organizers do hope to publish some of the viewgraphs (slides, or 
"OHP") on the Internet again, in lieu of a Proceedings.

- Jed

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Mon Nov  5 13:47:12 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id NAA22104;
	Mon, 5 Nov 2001 13:46:34 -0800
Resent-Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 13:46:34 -0800
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 16:54:05 -0500 (EST)
From: John Schnurer <herman antioch-college.edu>
To: Jed Rothwell <jedrothwell infinite-energy.com>
cc: vortex-L eskimo.com
Subject: E mail  Filtering 
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20011105133535.02e1f080 pop.mindspring.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1011105165127.16158D-100000 college.antioch-college.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Resent-Message-ID: <"k_Rbe2.0.BP5.vYmvx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45194
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 



	Dear vo... and Jed,


	Can you please send... or find someone to send ..please
	an "how to do it for dummies" to show someone who has hotmail how
to turn off the HTML generator....

	This is NOT me.... so I will be forwarding it along and do not
know the skill level of the potential recipient.


			Thanks,
							J

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Mon Nov  5 13:51:14 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id NAA25370;
	Mon, 5 Nov 2001 13:50:24 -0800
Resent-Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 13:50:24 -0800
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20011105163915.02e1f080 pop.mindspring.com>
X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2001 16:50:26 -0500
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
From: Jed Rothwell <jedrothwell infinite-energy.com>
Subject: Re: Celani's comments at JCF3 . . .
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20011105153857.02e16928 pop.mindspring.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Resent-Message-ID: <"FpwKn1.0.KC6.Wcmvx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45195
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

I wrote:

>Ralstonia is a remarkably hardly bacteria.

Meant "hardy;" strong, resilient, stalwart. Fortunately, Ralstonia cannot 
infect humans or animals.

As Celani reported last year, in another study they are investigating the 
possibility of generating large amounts of free hydrogen from the 
Ralstonia's metabolism in the presence of light. This may be a good solar 
energy source in arid countries.

He also mentioned that "some kind of bacteria 'fermentation'" might be 
confused with low level CF excess heat, in cells with a large amount of 
electrolyte (~1 liter) in which the bacteria can thrive. Most CF cells have 
less than a liter, and enough lithium to kill Ralstonia.

- Jed

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Mon Nov  5 20:00:31 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id TAA08856;
	Mon, 5 Nov 2001 19:56:49 -0800
Resent-Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 19:56:49 -0800
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 23:04:27 -0500 (EST)
From: John Schnurer <herman antioch-college.edu>
To: Vortex <vortex-l eskimo.com>
cc: Schnurer <herman antioch-college.edu>
Subject: Auroa
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1011105230219.1733C-100000 college.antioch-college.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Resent-Message-ID: <"4XkGX2.0.IA2.1-rvx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45196
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 



	We were able to see northern lights in Dayton Ohio area this
evening.... pink, green on top.  Time about 10:20 pm.  Visible to the
North East for over 30 minutes.

			


From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Tue Nov  6 03:18:24 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id DAA22000;
	Tue, 6 Nov 2001 03:14:42 -0800
Resent-Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 03:14:42 -0800
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 11:14:21 +0000
From: Josef Karthauser <joe tao.org.uk>
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Re: Computer Based Power Measurements
Message-ID: <20011106111421.D89450 tao.org.uk>
Mail-Followup-To: Josef Karthauser <joe tao.org.uk>,
	vortex-l eskimo.com
References: <v04011700b4d303e2cfdc [207.8.127.22]> <38AD94D2.66176F22@ix.netcom.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="M38YqGLZlgb6RLPS"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <38AD94D2.66176F22 ix.netcom.com>; from storms2@ix.netcom.com on Fri, Feb 18, 2000 at 11:52:06AM -0700
Resent-Message-ID: <"MYhAA.0.gN5.XOyvx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45197
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 


--M38YqGLZlgb6RLPS
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Feb 18, 2000 at 11:52:06AM -0700, Edmund Storms wrote:
> I recommend the National Instruments (800 433-3488) DA card using LabView=
 as
> the software.  While this combination is rather expensive, it allows data=
 from
> DC to MHz to be taken on 16 to hundreds of channels while doing any kind =
of
> calculation and plotting the data in real time.  The card can also be use=
d to
> run the experiment.  Either a PC or a Mac can be used.
>=20
> Ed Storms

Hi Ed,

How much does this combination cost, and is the protocol API public, or
do I have to use their software?

Joe

--M38YqGLZlgb6RLPS
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iEYEARECAAYFAjvnxg0ACgkQXVIcjOaxUBanuwCfW5FI6MC1SxNefjK2NRww/A1L
u/cAoO/iIQzUSr83DbkM45NBg3AFNBN5
=j+NM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--M38YqGLZlgb6RLPS--

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Tue Nov  6 07:17:29 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id HAA01076;
	Tue, 6 Nov 2001 07:14:33 -0800
Resent-Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 07:14:33 -0800
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20011106101037.00ab54e8 pop.mindspring.com>
X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2001 10:14:36 -0500
To: vortex-L eskimo.com
From: Jed Rothwell <jedrothwell infinite-energy.com>
Subject: Celani describes lab bioremediation
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Resent-Message-ID: <"c5UFj.0.fG.Pv_vx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45198
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

I asked Francesco Celani how they plan to purify water with Ralstonia. I 
said "I presume you filter the water to hold back the bacteria." He said 
that is "almost correct," meaning that is how it would be done on a large 
scale. For now, they are verifying the process with an elaborate, 
expensive, small scale method:

". . . to validate our experiments we used the "standard ISO 2002" 
ultra-centrifugation methods (very-very expensive!!!), HNO3 (65%, 80 deg C, 
2 hours chemical attack of bacteria bodies) dissolution, ICP-MS analysis. 
The analysis were performed by a third-part, standard ISO 9002
Laboratory (the 'Centro Sviluppo Materiali').

After the results of Italian National Health Institute about "safety in open
field use" we will try to develop a more economically efficient method."

- Jed

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Tue Nov  6 08:16:54 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id IAA05324;
	Tue, 6 Nov 2001 08:14:17 -0800
Resent-Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 08:14:17 -0800
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20011106110740.03618210 pop.mindspring.com>
X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2001 11:14:22 -0500
To: vortex-L eskimo.com
From: Jed Rothwell <jedrothwell infinite-energy.com>
Subject: Taubes writes about skepticism
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Resent-Message-ID: <"N16Xf2.0.5J1.Pn0wx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45199
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

I hesitate to bring this up . . . See:

http://www.techreview.com/magazine/nov01/insight.asp

Naturally, I think he couldn't be more wrong. He misses the point. There 
was no opposition to the DNA hypothesis because it did not threaten 
anyone's funding. There was no competing, established theory to explain 
cell replication, and no major projects. Opposition to new ideas is 
proportional to financial interest. Most people put money first, above 
everything. Everything else, including truth, professional responsibility, 
the needs of the public, patriotism, academic ethics and pollution is 
secondary. That isn't to say people will never promote the truth or act 
responsible. They will, as long as it does not cost them a great deal of 
money or threaten their livelihood.

- Jed

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Tue Nov  6 08:48:15 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id IAA24662;
	Tue, 6 Nov 2001 08:45:34 -0800
Resent-Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 08:45:34 -0800
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <a05100301b80d3385ea84 [4.46.76.105]>
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20011101152358.02cc23b8 pop.mindspring.com>
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20011101152358.02cc23b8 pop.mindspring.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 10:45:53 -0600
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
From: thomas malloy <temalloy metro.lakes.com>
Subject: Biological transmutations site
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
Resent-Message-ID: <"o_oZU1.0.G16.kE1wx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45200
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

I met Dr. Pappas when he spoke at the INE conference in the mid '90's 
his website at   www.papimi.gr proports to be about biological 
transmutations. The links are in the gray area to the right of the 
page.  I wrote the doctor an email inquiring about the 
transmutations and haven't received a reply. If anyone has any 
insights into this, please post them.
-- 

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Tue Nov  6 09:00:49 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id IAA02051;
	Tue, 6 Nov 2001 08:58:50 -0800
Resent-Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 08:58:50 -0800
X-Authentication-Warning: eskimo.com: lajoie owned process doing -bs
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 08:58:47 -0800 (PST)
From: Stephen Lajoie <lajoie eskimo.com>
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Re: Taubes writes about skepticism
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20011106110740.03618210 pop.mindspring.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.96.1011106083110.17393A-100000 eskimo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Resent-Message-ID: <"Uy9LS3.0.vV.9R1wx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45201
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

On Tue, 6 Nov 2001, Jed Rothwell wrote:

> I hesitate to bring this up . . . See:
> 
> http://www.techreview.com/magazine/nov01/insight.asp
> 
> Naturally, I think he couldn't be more wrong. He misses the point. There 
> was no opposition to the DNA hypothesis because it did not threaten 
> anyone's funding. There was no competing, established theory to explain 
> cell replication, and no major projects. Opposition to new ideas is 
> proportional to financial interest. Most people put money first, above 
> everything. 

[snip]

Yes, this financial interest is called "bias". Some people are good enough
to not let personal bias influence their thinking. 

Note Taubes, who's fame and fortune is dependent on "debunking" things,
shows his lack of scientific mettle by first studying the stock market, and
then, because everyone says so, stupidly blows his savings doing the exact
opposite of what he found scientifically that he should be doing. He is a
sucker for popular opinion. He is more than willing to set science aside
if a community says so. In this case, he set aside science because the
investing community, which didn't study the issue, said otherwise. He's
also set aside science because the scientific community, which didn't
study cold fusion, said otherwise. 

He then stumbles and thinks that his error was that he wasn't skeptical
enough about stock market investments. Notice that his thinking is that
science and popular opinion, not based on science, are equally credible!
He has a great deal of reverence for popular opinion. He doesn't find his
error to be that he put the results of a scientific study on equal footing
with popular opinion, he finds that he wasn't skeptical enough, as if
there was NO difference between science and the unfounded popular opinion.
He should be thinking stick to the science and avoid unscientific
opinions!

Further errors in his paradigm is revealed when he says: 

"The reality is that vigorous skepticism aimed at a potential new paradigm
means one of two things and usually both:  first, that the spectacular
breakthrough or the wondrous paradigm is indeed too good to be true, and
second, that the reasons to be skeptical are very good ones. If the
evidence supporting the new paradigm reaches a high enough pitch, then the 
skepticism will fade."

Now, think about what this man is saying: if a new scientific finding is
too good to be true, disbelieve it until someone else brings more data to
prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that it is true and the skeptics are
proven wrong.

This is so counter to the philosophy of science, so offensive to rational
thought, such a disservice to the the true scientist that cannot be
described as anything but stupid. Does Taubes not see that his philosophy
requires that someone have an open mind, that someone continue to research
and apply the scientific method, for his intellectually bankrupt
philosophy to work? Who does Taubes think is finding the evidence that
proves the skeptic, who Taubes' admires, wrong? That someone is the real
scientist. The very person Taubes' has ridiculed with his silly philosophy
of skepticism. 

How is science to be done in a world where there are so many people like
Taubes trying to drag us back into the trees?


From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Tue Nov  6 09:22:10 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id JAA15901;
	Tue, 6 Nov 2001 09:19:15 -0800
Resent-Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 09:19:15 -0800
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 10:41:43 -0800 (PST)
From: hank scudder <hjscudde newton.csun.edu>
To: Vortex <vortex-l eskimo.com>
cc: Schnurer <herman antioch-college.edu>
Subject: Re: Auroa
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1011105230219.1733C-100000 college.antioch-college.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0111061039550.23335-100000 newton.csun.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Resent-Message-ID: <"0liS01.0.3u3.Ik1wx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45202
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

John
	A massive solar flare occurred a few days ago. Tonight should be
good also. My astronomy prof said we may be able to see it in southern
California tonight.

Hank


On Mon, 5 Nov 2001, John Schnurer wrote:

> 
> 
> 	We were able to see northern lights in Dayton Ohio area this
> evening.... pink, green on top.  Time about 10:20 pm.  Visible to the
> North East for over 30 minutes.
> 
> 			
> 
> 

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Tue Nov  6 10:38:17 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id KAA00689;
	Tue, 6 Nov 2001 10:35:17 -0800
Resent-Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 10:35:17 -0800
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20011106132817.03644ce0 pop.mindspring.com>
X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2001 13:35:21 -0500
To: vortex-L eskimo.com
From: Jed Rothwell <jedrothwell infinite-energy.com>
Subject: Particle beam CF in Japan
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Resent-Message-ID: <"yzglL1.0.hA.br2wx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45203
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

Many of the JCF presentations, and much of the research in Japan is devoted 
to particle beam CF. I do not understand enough about this to describe it 
with confidence. Perhaps someone who knows about the subject would like to 
review the JCF3 Abstracts 21 through 25. Akito Takahashi, of Osaka National 
University, has been the main proponent of this approach, and most of the 
papers are by his graduate students. K. Kamada of the Wakasa-bay Energy 
Research Center also presented a paper on deuterons implanted in Al. 
Takahashi is one of the senior scientists at the 30-meter accelerator at 
the Department of Nuclear Engineering, so he is entitled to several hours a 
month on the beam. He published a paper about his fusion theory a few years 
ago:

Akito Takahashi, Katsuhiko Maruta, Kentaro Ochiai and Hiroyuki Miyamaru, 
"Detection of three-body deuteron fusion in titanium deuteride under the 
stimulation by a deuteron beam," Physics Letters A, Volume 255, Issues 1-2, 
3 May 1999, Pages 89-97

Here is the essence of this research, as I understand it. I hope this is 
not so oversimplified it is a caricature rather than a description.

A deuteron beam is used to load samples of Ti or Pd. This causes 
conventional fusion, as deuterons impact on ones that are already implanted 
in the metal, in "pile up" and "double pile up" reactions. Takahashi 
believes that in addition to these conventional reactions, another set of 
anomalous nuclear reactions are taking place, in which three deuteron fuse 
together. This three-body fusion reaction rate is 10E26 higher than 
predicted by conventional theory.

The difficult part of these experiments is to distinguish between the 
particles produced by the various conventional nuclear reactions and CF 
reactions. Charged particle Ek-detectors (silicon solid-state detectors - 
Si-SSD) are set at different angles around the sample, typically 90 and 120 
degrees from the deuteron beam path. Thin foil is often placed in front of 
the detectors to filter out some of the particles. In same cases, a thin 
detector is placed in front of a thicker one. In one experiment, 90 degrees 
away from the beam, a 26 micron slice of silicon intercepts 4.75 MeV 
helium-3, and it is placed in front of a 200 micron detector which captures 
4.75 MeV tritons. Energy spectra are produced with various peaks which are 
then identified, such as tritons from D-D collisions (on the low end at 
around 0.5 MeV), which are conventional, expected products. Unexpected 
peaks include helium-3 from 3D collisions (4.75 MeV) and t (also 4.75 MeV). 
The helium-3 signal is very close to the signal of protons from D-D pileup 
reactions, and thus, difficult to distinguish from it. (In particle physics 
jargon, it is "on the shoulder of" the D-D proton 2.5 MeV reaction.)

Essentially, the conventional reactions are identified and subtracted out 
from the curve, leaving evidence that Takahashi and his coworkers think 
points to a new type of 3-body D-D-D reaction, which should be largely 
aneutronic. He thinks similar reactions occur in CF cathodes and gas loaded 
finely divided particles.

Takahashi also believes that these fusion reactions give rise to heavy 
element fission, of a type he calls "multi-photon induced fission (MPIF)" 
according to his "selective channel scission (SCS)" model. This fission 
produces mainly stable, Beta decay products. This induced fission explains 
the transmuted elements found in used cathodes. Takahashi thinks it may be 
possible to "fine tune" the fission by lowering the energy from fusion, to 
prevent the formation of unstable (radioactive) species, although he says 
this is only speculation at this stage. Thus, it might be possible to 
reduce transmutation with a Pd cathode, which would save money because Pd 
is expensive and produces very little energy from fission compared to 
3-body fusion. On the other hand, it might be possible to increase fission 
with a uranium-235 target (that is stable, depleted uranium). The uranium 
fission would produce roughly ten times more energy than the cold fusion 
reaction which triggers it. None of the products from Pd or U would be 
radioactive.

It is dangerous to try to draw conclusions from the entire body of evidence 
from all CF research, because the experiments are such a heterogenous 
mixture of good and bad research. However, overall results do support 
Takahashi's conclusion.  (He must realize this, since his English is 
excellent and he is very knowledgeable about other people's research.) As 
far as I know, only one CF experiment produced many radioactive, 
short-lived heavy metal transmutations, performed by the late Kevin Wolf at 
TAMU. Many studies have produced stable isotopes. Because it is terribly 
difficult to distinguish between minute amounts of stable transmuted 
elements and contamination, I suspect that some of these findings are 
mistakes, but there are enough solid, rigorous results, especially from 
Mitsubishi, that I am now convinced transmutation does occur. Evidently, in 
nearly every case, it results in stable elements. That is good news for the 
prospect of making practical energy generating systems, but it is a little 
awkward for our present purposes. Radioactive species can be detected in 
tiny amounts, much smaller than spectroscopy can measure, and they are 
instantly and unambiguously distinguished from contamination, unless you 
are performing the experiment near the site of a catastrophic nuclear 
accident. If Takahashi does find a way to fine tune the reaction and force 
it to produce radioactive isotopes, he will do a great service to the field 
for two reasons: 1. The result would be very convincing, as Wolf's result 
was. 2. It would demonstrate what to avoid in a practical energy generating 
system, analogous to a test in which an engineer deliberately induces a 
boiler failure or cracked cylinder in a conventional engine.

A beam loading experiment is not intended to be a practical form of cold 
fusion, but rather a research tool to reveal the mechanism of the reaction 
by loading metal samples with deuterons rapidly and uniformly.

Newsweek recently wrote: "Takahashi says if he doesn't get good results in 
two years, he'll retire." This is not what Takahashi told the reporter. He 
said he will reach mandatory retirement in two years, when he must leave 
regardless of the state of his experiments. Takahashi already thinks he has 
"good results." Unfortunately his work has been largely ignored by other 
researchers, especially those who have access to large particle beams. 
Unless it is replicated, and others agree the results really do indicate a 
huge increase in anomalous three-body reactions, I fear this line of 
research will die out after Takahashi retires.

- Jed

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Tue Nov  6 11:17:34 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id LAA26123;
	Tue, 6 Nov 2001 11:14:29 -0800
Resent-Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 11:14:29 -0800
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20011106140818.03618210 pop.mindspring.com>
X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2001 14:14:32 -0500
To: vortex-L eskimo.com
From: Jed Rothwell <jedrothwell infinite-energy.com>
Subject: Iwamura submission to the English JJAP
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Resent-Message-ID: <"KIuy52.0.0O6.LQ3wx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45204
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

Iwamura (Mitsubishi) says he submitted a paper to the English version of 
the Japanese Journal of Applied Physics (JJAP). As I noted earlier, JJAP 
has published several important papers about cold fusion recently, so I 
expect it will accept and publish this one, which ranks as one of the most 
important ever written.

The JJAP is Japan's leading journal of physics, and it is widely considered 
one of the world's top ten. Things like this should make Taubes and Robert 
Park nervous, but those people have Kelvar reenforced hides. Nothing short 
of a commercial product will shake them.

- Jed

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Tue Nov  6 12:57:23 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id MAA03447;
	Tue, 6 Nov 2001 12:56:48 -0800
Resent-Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 12:56:48 -0800
From: Robin van Spaandonk <rvanspaa bigpond.net.au>
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Re: Iwamura submission to the English JJAP
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2001 07:56:10 +1100
Organization: Improving
Message-ID: <l0jgutg1jd4dvg2glp52orj2saq50nc79s 4ax.com>
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20011106140818.03618210 pop.mindspring.com>
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20011106140818.03618210 pop.mindspring.com>
X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.553
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id MAA03372
Resent-Message-ID: <"Bkh7H3.0.fr.Fw4wx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45206
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

In reply to  Jed Rothwell's message of Tue, 06 Nov 2001 14:14:32 -0500:

>Iwamura (Mitsubishi) says he submitted a paper to the English version of 
>the Japanese Journal of Applied Physics (JJAP). As I noted earlier, JJAP 
>has published several important papers about cold fusion recently, so I 
>expect it will accept and publish this one, which ranks as one of the most 
>important ever written.
Hi Jed,

Could you give us another heads up if it is published?

TIA,


Robin van Spaandonk <rvanspaa bigpond.net.au>

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Tue Nov  6 12:59:14 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id MAA03304;
	Tue, 6 Nov 2001 12:56:39 -0800
Resent-Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 12:56:39 -0800
From: Robin van Spaandonk <rvanspaa bigpond.net.au>
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Re: Particle beam CF in Japan
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2001 07:55:29 +1100
Organization: Improving
Message-ID: <fdigutkqg4v8aut9imc5bkqp1gnf4dpchu 4ax.com>
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20011106132817.03644ce0 pop.mindspring.com>
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20011106132817.03644ce0 pop.mindspring.com>
X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.553
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id MAA03267
Resent-Message-ID: <"lVkY32.0.Yp.6w4wx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45205
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

In reply to  Jed Rothwell's message of Tue, 06 Nov 2001 13:35:21 -0500:
[snip]
>3-body fusion. On the other hand, it might be possible to increase fission 
>with a uranium-235 target (that is stable, depleted uranium). The uranium 

Actually, U-235 is the unstable explosive kind. U-238 is depleted
uranium.
[snip]
>Newsweek recently wrote: "Takahashi says if he doesn't get good results in 
>two years, he'll retire." This is not what Takahashi told the reporter. He 
>said he will reach mandatory retirement in two years, when he must leave 
>regardless of the state of his experiments. Takahashi already thinks he has 
>"good results." Unfortunately his work has been largely ignored by other 
>researchers, especially those who have access to large particle beams. 
>Unless it is replicated, and others agree the results really do indicate a 
>huge increase in anomalous three-body reactions, I fear this line of 
>research will die out after Takahashi retires.
[snip]
Perhaps he can still "hang around" even after retirement?


Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/

....Put the "bottom line" at the top!

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Tue Nov  6 13:05:06 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id NAA07776;
	Tue, 6 Nov 2001 13:04:08 -0800
Resent-Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 13:04:08 -0800
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 14:26:27 -0800 (PST)
From: hank scudder <hjscudde newton.csun.edu>
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Re: Particle beam CF in Japan
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20011106132817.03644ce0 pop.mindspring.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0111061424200.23335-100000 newton.csun.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Resent-Message-ID: <"zmjdo1.0.Jv1.815wx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45207
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

Jed
	Do Japanese Universitys have emeritus professors?
Hank

On Tue, 6 Nov 2001, Jed Rothwell wrote:

> Many of the JCF presentations, and much of the research in Japan is devoted 
> to particle beam CF. I do not understand enough about this to describe it 
> with confidence. Perhaps someone who knows about the subject would like to 
> review the JCF3 Abstracts 21 through 25. Akito Takahashi, of Osaka National 
> University, has been the main proponent of this approach, and most of the 
> papers are by his graduate students. K. Kamada of the Wakasa-bay Energy 
> Research Center also presented a paper on deuterons implanted in Al. 
> Takahashi is one of the senior scientists at the 30-meter accelerator at 
> the Department of Nuclear Engineering, so he is entitled to several hours a 
> month on the beam. He published a paper about his fusion theory a few years 
> ago:
> 
> Akito Takahashi, Katsuhiko Maruta, Kentaro Ochiai and Hiroyuki Miyamaru, 
> "Detection of three-body deuteron fusion in titanium deuteride under the 
> stimulation by a deuteron beam," Physics Letters A, Volume 255, Issues 1-2, 
> 3 May 1999, Pages 89-97
> 
> Here is the essence of this research, as I understand it. I hope this is 
> not so oversimplified it is a caricature rather than a description.
> 
> A deuteron beam is used to load samples of Ti or Pd. This causes 
> conventional fusion, as deuterons impact on ones that are already implanted 
> in the metal, in "pile up" and "double pile up" reactions. Takahashi 
> believes that in addition to these conventional reactions, another set of 
> anomalous nuclear reactions are taking place, in which three deuteron fuse 
> together. This three-body fusion reaction rate is 10E26 higher than 
> predicted by conventional theory.
> 
> The difficult part of these experiments is to distinguish between the 
> particles produced by the various conventional nuclear reactions and CF 
> reactions. Charged particle Ek-detectors (silicon solid-state detectors - 
> Si-SSD) are set at different angles around the sample, typically 90 and 120 
> degrees from the deuteron beam path. Thin foil is often placed in front of 
> the detectors to filter out some of the particles. In same cases, a thin 
> detector is placed in front of a thicker one. In one experiment, 90 degrees 
> away from the beam, a 26 micron slice of silicon intercepts 4.75 MeV 
> helium-3, and it is placed in front of a 200 micron detector which captures 
> 4.75 MeV tritons. Energy spectra are produced with various peaks which are 
> then identified, such as tritons from D-D collisions (on the low end at 
> around 0.5 MeV), which are conventional, expected products. Unexpected 
> peaks include helium-3 from 3D collisions (4.75 MeV) and t (also 4.75 MeV). 
> The helium-3 signal is very close to the signal of protons from D-D pileup 
> reactions, and thus, difficult to distinguish from it. (In particle physics 
> jargon, it is "on the shoulder of" the D-D proton 2.5 MeV reaction.)
> 
> Essentially, the conventional reactions are identified and subtracted out 
> from the curve, leaving evidence that Takahashi and his coworkers think 
> points to a new type of 3-body D-D-D reaction, which should be largely 
> aneutronic. He thinks similar reactions occur in CF cathodes and gas loaded 
> finely divided particles.
> 
> Takahashi also believes that these fusion reactions give rise to heavy 
> element fission, of a type he calls "multi-photon induced fission (MPIF)" 
> according to his "selective channel scission (SCS)" model. This fission 
> produces mainly stable, Beta decay products. This induced fission explains 
> the transmuted elements found in used cathodes. Takahashi thinks it may be 
> possible to "fine tune" the fission by lowering the energy from fusion, to 
> prevent the formation of unstable (radioactive) species, although he says 
> this is only speculation at this stage. Thus, it might be possible to 
> reduce transmutation with a Pd cathode, which would save money because Pd 
> is expensive and produces very little energy from fission compared to 
> 3-body fusion. On the other hand, it might be possible to increase fission 
> with a uranium-235 target (that is stable, depleted uranium). The uranium 
> fission would produce roughly ten times more energy than the cold fusion 
> reaction which triggers it. None of the products from Pd or U would be 
> radioactive.
> 
> It is dangerous to try to draw conclusions from the entire body of evidence 
> from all CF research, because the experiments are such a heterogenous 
> mixture of good and bad research. However, overall results do support 
> Takahashi's conclusion.  (He must realize this, since his English is 
> excellent and he is very knowledgeable about other people's research.) As 
> far as I know, only one CF experiment produced many radioactive, 
> short-lived heavy metal transmutations, performed by the late Kevin Wolf at 
> TAMU. Many studies have produced stable isotopes. Because it is terribly 
> difficult to distinguish between minute amounts of stable transmuted 
> elements and contamination, I suspect that some of these findings are 
> mistakes, but there are enough solid, rigorous results, especially from 
> Mitsubishi, that I am now convinced transmutation does occur. Evidently, in 
> nearly every case, it results in stable elements. That is good news for the 
> prospect of making practical energy generating systems, but it is a little 
> awkward for our present purposes. Radioactive species can be detected in 
> tiny amounts, much smaller than spectroscopy can measure, and they are 
> instantly and unambiguously distinguished from contamination, unless you 
> are performing the experiment near the site of a catastrophic nuclear 
> accident. If Takahashi does find a way to fine tune the reaction and force 
> it to produce radioactive isotopes, he will do a great service to the field 
> for two reasons: 1. The result would be very convincing, as Wolf's result 
> was. 2. It would demonstrate what to avoid in a practical energy generating 
> system, analogous to a test in which an engineer deliberately induces a 
> boiler failure or cracked cylinder in a conventional engine.
> 
> A beam loading experiment is not intended to be a practical form of cold 
> fusion, but rather a research tool to reveal the mechanism of the reaction 
> by loading metal samples with deuterons rapidly and uniformly.
> 
> Newsweek recently wrote: "Takahashi says if he doesn't get good results in 
> two years, he'll retire." This is not what Takahashi told the reporter. He 
> said he will reach mandatory retirement in two years, when he must leave 
> regardless of the state of his experiments. Takahashi already thinks he has 
> "good results." Unfortunately his work has been largely ignored by other 
> researchers, especially those who have access to large particle beams. 
> Unless it is replicated, and others agree the results really do indicate a 
> huge increase in anomalous three-body reactions, I fear this line of 
> research will die out after Takahashi retires.
> 
> - Jed
> 

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Tue Nov  6 13:50:10 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id NAA02467;
	Tue, 6 Nov 2001 13:47:24 -0800
Resent-Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 13:47:24 -0800
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20011106162858.0364b918 pop.mindspring.com>
X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2001 16:47:08 -0500
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
From: Jed Rothwell <jedrothwell infinite-energy.com>
Subject: Re: Particle beam CF in Japan
In-Reply-To: <fdigutkqg4v8aut9imc5bkqp1gnf4dpchu 4ax.com>
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20011106132817.03644ce0 pop.mindspring.com>
 <5.1.0.14.2.20011106132817.03644ce0 pop.mindspring.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Resent-Message-ID: <"844ja.0.Mc.hf5wx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45208
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

Robin van Spaandonk wrote:

>Actually, U-235 is the unstable explosive kind. U-238 is depleted
>uranium.

Oops. Okay, let me check . . . Okay, here is the story. JCF3-20 is a study 
of conventional fission; Masayuki Ohta and Akito Takahashi,
"Analysis on fission in U-235 by SCS Model." In other words, they are 
trying to apply their (somewhat new) theory to conventional fission, and 
then backtrack to CF results fit studies mainly by Ohmori and Mizuno with 
CF in Pd, W and Au.

This presentation closed with some remarks about stable U, and the 
prospects for using it as fission fuel in a CF cell. Quoting the Abstract:

"The products characterizing the total chain yields for the respective mass 
numbers from thermal neutron fission in U-235 around two peaks of mass 
distribution is mainly stable or pure beta-decay isotope. Long-lived 
gamma-emitter is little in these products. If fission can be induced by 
e.g. photons at lower excitation energy (e.g. about 5 MeV for U-235) than 
that by neutron (i.e. 6.5 MeV for U-236), very clean fission is possible to 
induce. And prompt neutron production rate is expected to be less because 
the prompt neutron emission is much from the fission products around mass 
115 and 155."

 >Unless it is replicated, and others agree the results really do indicate a
> >huge increase in anomalous three-body reactions, I fear this line of
> >research will die out after Takahashi retires.
>[snip]
>Perhaps he can still "hang around" even after retirement?

No, not at a National University. Many Nat. U. professors migrate to other 
universities or teaching jobs, but when their time is up, they are pushed 
out. The only exception I have ever heard of is Arata, who has an office in 
the Osaka Nat. U. building named after himself. In American universities 
you sometimes see emeritus professors hanging around, but I do not think it 
is allowed in the Japanese National University system. They have such 
strong traditions of seniority, that would make the system even more 
constipated than it is.

In most Japanese organizations, until recently anyway, mandatory retirement 
ages were very low, typically 55 to 60. That was the only way to bring new 
blood into the organization, and more to the point, salaries were strictly 
by seniority, not merit, so organizations were anxious to get rid of their 
highest-paid tier of workers.

If it were not for emeritus professors, cold fusion would have been 
forgotten five years ago. One of them at JCF was doing a brave job trying 
to sort out the Brown's Gas claims, working on a shoestring. (Abstract #8). 
It is a shame to see such talent wasted on such a weak claim.

- Jed

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Wed Nov  7 07:48:55 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id HAA06934;
	Wed, 7 Nov 2001 07:44:58 -0800
Resent-Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2001 07:44:58 -0800
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2001 10:52:33 -0500 (EST)
From: John Schnurer <herman antioch-college.edu>
To: Jed Rothwell <jedrothwell infinite-energy.com>
cc: vortex-L eskimo.com
Subject: Re: Celani describes lab bioremediation
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20011106101037.00ab54e8 pop.mindspring.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1011107105200.17525F-100000 college.antioch-college.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Resent-Message-ID: <"TS0aV3.0.9i1.vRLwx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45209
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 




	Jed,

	Can you put this bioremediation in context for us, please?

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Wed Nov  7 08:26:33 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id IAA31094;
	Wed, 7 Nov 2001 08:23:34 -0800
Resent-Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2001 08:23:34 -0800
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20011107111515.00ab5658 pop.mindspring.com>
X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2001 11:23:35 -0500
To: vortex-L eskimo.com
From: Jed Rothwell <jedrothwell infinite-energy.com>
Subject: Spoke with Honda Insight hybrid vehicle owner
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Resent-Message-ID: <"Q7Z5a2.0.lb7.60Mwx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45210
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

The other day I saw a Honda Insight hybrid automobile parked in front of my 
office. I left a business card on the windshield, and the owner later 
called me to share his impressions of the car. Here are some of his 
impressions. I have heard that acceleration is sluggish and performance is 
something of a compromise. I asked how well does the car do on Atlanta's 
highways, which are notorious for high speed tailgating, aggressive trucks, 
and other reckless drivers.

He said, "you have to consider the purpose and place. This is not a high 
performance vehicle." He uses it to commute downtown, usually over 
Atlanta's main highway I-85, or on surface streets. He has an Accord, too. 
The performance is not that different. He considers the Insight a 
completely satisfactory and practical means of transport, without 
limitations or complications. I did not get the sense he feels he is 
driving an experimental vehicle that needs special handling.

The Insight has a three-cylinder engine that is small and sluggish compared 
to an SUV, for example. The motor takes over the drive train directly in 
high gear, and during high speed acceleration the electric motor also 
contributes power. There are indicators showing remaining battery charge, 
and whether the battery is recharging or discharging (the "charge and 
assist indicator"). There is a little energy left over from the gas engine 
even at high speed. On the highway, once he settles into a steady cruising 
speed of 60 to 70 mph on a level road, the battery shows a slight positive 
recharge in progress. He has never seen the battery close to full 
discharge. On the other hand, he has not yet climbed a large hill. I 
mentioned that I have a 1994 Geo Metro, which goes 65 mph at top speed. I 
sometimes feel intimidated driving on Atlanta's highways in heavy traffic, 
and it was a challenge keeping up with traffic on Lookout Mountain in 
Chattanooga, TN.

I asked: "Overall it is safer than a motorcycle, isn't it?" Driver: "Yes, 
indeed. I have had one of them."

He said he was partly motivated to buy it to "do something for the 
environment." If everyone drove cars like this, we would cut our oil 
consumption in half. He has spent time in Europe, particularly Italy, and 
he says that shaped his perspective. In Europe fuel is expensive, parking 
space is limited, and people want cars as convenient tools, not social 
statements or off-road adventure fantasies.

I said I think more unfettered capitalist competition would have brought 
cars like this into the U.S. market sooner, and in larger numbers. 
Development has been impeded by both industry and government. He agreed.

For more information on the Insight, see:

http://www.honda2001.com./models/insight/index.html?honda=intro

The hybrid automobile is not a new idea. The first patent for one was 
issued in 1905. (See V. Wouk, "Hybrid Electric Vehicles," Scientific 
American, October 1977). I expect they became more practical with the 
invention of microcomputers.

- Jed

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Wed Nov  7 08:27:37 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id IAA00719;
	Wed, 7 Nov 2001 08:26:37 -0800
Resent-Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2001 08:26:37 -0800
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20011107112511.00ab5658 pop.mindspring.com>
X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2001 11:26:28 -0500
To: John Schnurer <herman antioch-college.edu>
From: Jed Rothwell <jedrothwell infinite-energy.com>
Subject: Re: Celani describes lab bioremediation
Cc: vortex-L eskimo.com
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1011107105200.17525F-100000 college.antioch-
 college.edu>
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20011106101037.00ab54e8 pop.mindspring.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Resent-Message-ID: <"lpwLt3.0.yA.x2Mwx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45211
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

John Schnurer wrote:

         Jed,
>         Can you put this bioremediation in context for us, please?

What do you mean? What questions do you have in mind?

I do not know much about it. I do have copies of Celani's viewgraphs from 
JCF2, with many technical details.

- Jed

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Wed Nov  7 11:03:41 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id LAA05111;
	Wed, 7 Nov 2001 11:00:30 -0800
Resent-Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2001 11:00:30 -0800
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20011107135718.00ab1c70 pop.mindspring.com>
X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2001 14:00:34 -0500
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
From: Jed Rothwell <jedrothwell infinite-energy.com>
Subject: Re: Spoke with Honda Insight hybrid vehicle owner
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20011107111515.00ab5658 pop.mindspring.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Resent-Message-ID: <"T31yb1.0.IF1.DJOwx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45212
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

I copied that message to Bill Moore, the editor of EVWorld.com. He responded:


Two words of advise after having driven my Insight a year and more than
12,000 miles.

"down shift"

The car has surprising pep if you down shift the car to 3rd for 
acceleration. Don't rely on the edrive alone or it will be sluggish.


- Jed

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Wed Nov  7 11:20:10 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id LAA14486;
	Wed, 7 Nov 2001 11:16:34 -0800
Resent-Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2001 11:16:34 -0800
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20011107141438.02e0b6d8 pop.mindspring.com>
X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2001 14:16:22 -0500
To: vortex-L eskimo.com
From: Jed Rothwell <jedrothwell infinite-energy.com>
Subject: NPR Science Friday looks at wind energy and hydrogen
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Resent-Message-ID: <"--r3X3.0.8Y3.GYOwx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45213
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

Program can be heard at:

http://www.npr.org/ramfiles/totn/20011026.totn.ram

- JR

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Wed Nov  7 18:33:54 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id SAA08363;
	Wed, 7 Nov 2001 18:30:31 -0800
Resent-Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2001 18:30:31 -0800
Message-ID: <002901c167f4$de7e8800$2c8f85ce computer>
Reply-To: "Frederick Sparber" <fjsparber earthlink.net>
From: "Frederick Sparber" <fjsparber earthlink.net>
To: <vortex-l eskimo.com>
Subject: Re: High Pressure Squeeze of DeuteroCarbons?
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2001 19:29:50 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Resent-Message-ID: <"FqqzJ3.0.W22.7vUwx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45214
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

When Jed posted that some of the CF work is pointing to
"3-body" interactions in the lattice, it comes to mind that
solid Deuterated Carbon compounds can be put in High
Pressure apparatus and subjected to Megabar pressures (~ 15 million pounds/square
inch) or so.

http://www.superconductors.org/sulfur.htm

Even "Deutero-Teflon" with it's fluorine atoms could be tried, as well as the solid
Deutero-Paraffins, and other solids that have the Hydrogen replaced a Deuteron.

Lots of choices.

Might be a connection to Les Case's reported Deuterium-Carbon-Pd OU effects here.

Regards,   Frederick




From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Wed Nov  7 19:32:44 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id TAA09321;
	Wed, 7 Nov 2001 19:29:30 -0800
Resent-Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2001 19:29:30 -0800
Message-ID: <005201c167fd$1b178e80$2c8f85ce computer>
Reply-To: "Frederick Sparber" <fjsparber earthlink.net>
From: "Frederick Sparber" <fjsparber earthlink.net>
To: <vortex-l eskimo.com>
Subject: Re: High Pressure Squeeze of DeuteroCarbons?
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2001 20:28:46 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Resent-Message-ID: <"y39Jc2.0.YH2.PmVwx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45215
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

Here's a source for all kinds of Deuterated Carbon compounds.
http://www.cdniso.com/englishversion/

Pressing a mix of a Deuterated Carbon "Wax" or such, with a metal powder at very high
pressure should make
some interesting "Deuteride Alloys" for CF Research.

Regards, Frederick



From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Thu Nov  8 04:24:39 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id EAA19600;
	Thu, 8 Nov 2001 04:21:47 -0800
Resent-Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2001 04:21:47 -0800
Message-ID: <000201c16847$778a3ec0$3c8f85ce computer>
Reply-To: "Frederick Sparber" <fjsparber earthlink.net>
From: "Frederick Sparber" <fjsparber earthlink.net>
To: <vortex-l eskimo.com>
Cc: <jlsparber earthlink.net>, <Deubedoo@aol.com>
Subject: Re: Fabrication of "Polarite" Materials in Microgravity
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2001 05:19:13 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Resent-Message-ID: <"5HcOb.0.Ao4.RZdwx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45216
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

Conclusions from the Wave-Circle Model and related experiments, suggest that materials
can be "Gravity Polarized" in a microgravity environment.

IOW, these materials can be pre-polarized so that in one orientation wrt a gravity
field they will be essentially weightless and in another superheavy.

This based on the assumption that the nuclei of all materials act like tiny magnetic
dipoles and always align to attract in a gravity field, but in a microgravity
environment
they can be aligned by strong electric fields and high pressure/temperature.

Once aligned and "cured," the "Polarite" can be used in the fabrication of spacecraft
and other vehicles, as long as they are gyro stabilized from flipping over and
becoming superheavy.

As soon as the International Space Station is fully operational, this conjecture can
be put to the test.  :-)

Regards,    Frederick

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Thu Nov  8 08:00:51 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id HAA02020;
	Thu, 8 Nov 2001 07:57:35 -0800
Resent-Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2001 07:57:35 -0800
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20011108102346.036185f8 pop.mindspring.com>
X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2001 10:57:40 -0500
To: vortex-L eskimo.com
From: Jed Rothwell <jedrothwell infinite-energy.com>
Subject: California energy crisis and Enron whither away
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id HAA01956
Resent-Message-ID: <"kUkzJ1.0.SV.kjgwx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45217
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

As I predicted here months ago, the California energy crisis has come to an 
abrupt halt, and the state may soon face an energy glut instead, thanks to 
conservation. Even before this year, California residents conserved more 
than the national average, but when the crisis hit they had no trouble 
reducing consumption by another 10 or 20%. Nationwide, I believe consumers 
and corporations could reduce energy consumption by 30 to 40% with cost 
effective measures; that is, by taking steps that would cost less than 
expanding the energy supply. There have been many estimates of this, some 
by coal companies, some by the DoE, with widely varying numbers. Based on 
the California experience, I am guessing the actual numbers are 30 to 40%.

I also predicted that some major energy companies would soon be in deep 
trouble, because they upset consumers and regulators by gouging -- that is, 
by taking extreme advantage of distressed conditions and unfairly 
withholding supplies. A wise corporate executive will not press every 
advantage. Temporary imbalances are self correcting, and once they are 
correct, customers will take revenge on companies that squeezed them 
unreasonably.

The most powerful and influential energy company is Enron. It has close 
ties to the administration, and it was immensely profitable. That did not 
protect it from the wrath of customers. It is now on the verge of 
bankruptcy. A competing company one-forth the size of Enron purchased it 
yesterday, for about one-tenth of the market value reached at the height of 
the crisis. This demonstrates the power of public opinion. The consumer 
rules the nation, whenever he chooses to. If consumers become aware that 
cold fusion is real, they will insist it be implemented, even though the 
administration, the oil companies, the DoE and many other powerful 
institutions will fight prevent that from happening.

See:

http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/04/national/04ENER.html?searchpv=past7days

http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/08/business/08POWE.html

Some quotes:

- - - - - - - - - - - -

Once Braced for a Power Shortage, California Now Finds Itself With a Surplus
By TIMOTHY EGAN

. . . rather than days of blackouts, from early May on there has not been a 
single hour with the lights out since then, and Californians have led the 
nation in energy conservation. Instead of a scarcity of power, California 
now has too much, and the state has been selling electricity at a loss or 
even giving it away.

But if California proved that it could defy the dire predictions and make 
of mockery of the energy-guzzling cliché often applied here, the state is 
still stuck with a huge burden from its disastrous experiment in power 
deregulation.

At the core of California's problem is this mystery: How could the state 
use less electricity this year and last and still pay $35 billion more for 
it than it did in 1999? . . .


"People realize now that this was a monumental scam," said Gov. Gray Davis 
of California in an interview, referring to the freewheeling energy market 
that ended earlier this year.

Records show that on some days during the worst of the power troubles, up 
to a third of the electricity that should have been available was taken off 
line, creating an artificial shortage that drove up prices, said Loretta 
Lynch, president of the California Public Utilities Commission.
"We had plenty of electric power available," Ms. Lynch said. "But we didn't 
have a cop on the beat." . . .

Last May, as he unveiled his energy policy, President Bush said the nation 
was facing the worst energy shortage since the Arab oil embargo of the 
1970's. His plan called for building one new power plant every week for the 
next 20 years, and drilling for oil in new places like the Arctic National 
Wildlife Refuge.

At the time, Vice President Dick Cheney said blackouts were a certainty in 
California and was dismissive of the conservation effort. . . .

The most optimistic projections had it that 10 percent of ratepayers would 
take advantage of the pay-to- conserve program. This week, the state 
released figures showing that more than a third of eligible ratepayers cut 
their electric use by 20 percent.

- - - - - - - - - - - -

Cold fusion would eliminate this kind of nonsense, along with many other 
nuisances. Good riddance to Enron! I look forward to seeing Exxon, Saudi 
Arabia and Iran go down the tubes with them. Society has suffered  far too 
long from their machinations and their inefficient, polluting 19th century 
technology. I pity the people who will lose their jobs, but the 
corporations and Sheiks deserve what is coming to them.

- Jed

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Thu Nov  8 10:26:49 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id KAA06089;
	Thu, 8 Nov 2001 10:24:00 -0800
Resent-Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2001 10:24:00 -0800
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2001 11:45:38 -0800 (PST)
From: hank scudder <hjscudde newton.csun.edu>
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Re: California energy crisis and Enron whither away
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20011108102346.036185f8 pop.mindspring.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0111081142060.12205-100000 newton.csun.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=X-UNKNOWN
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from QUOTED-PRINTABLE to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id KAA06049
Resent-Message-ID: <"Z_HVZ.0._U1._siwx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45218
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

Jed
	As an LA resident, my incremental rate went up to $.253/kwh last
summer. We set our thermostat at 85 degrees, and sat around in our
underware. I started charging my car at school instead of at home, when I
could. 

Hank

On Thu, 8 Nov 2001, Jed Rothwell wrote:

> As I predicted here months ago, the California energy crisis has come to an 
> abrupt halt, and the state may soon face an energy glut instead, thanks to 
> conservation. Even before this year, California residents conserved more 
> than the national average, but when the crisis hit they had no trouble 
> reducing consumption by another 10 or 20%. Nationwide, I believe consumers 
> and corporations could reduce energy consumption by 30 to 40% with cost 
> effective measures; that is, by taking steps that would cost less than 
> expanding the energy supply. There have been many estimates of this, some 
> by coal companies, some by the DoE, with widely varying numbers. Based on 
> the California experience, I am guessing the actual numbers are 30 to 40%.
> 
> I also predicted that some major energy companies would soon be in deep 
> trouble, because they upset consumers and regulators by gouging -- that is, 
> by taking extreme advantage of distressed conditions and unfairly 
> withholding supplies. A wise corporate executive will not press every 
> advantage. Temporary imbalances are self correcting, and once they are 
> correct, customers will take revenge on companies that squeezed them 
> unreasonably.
> 
> The most powerful and influential energy company is Enron. It has close 
> ties to the administration, and it was immensely profitable. That did not 
> protect it from the wrath of customers. It is now on the verge of 
> bankruptcy. A competing company one-forth the size of Enron purchased it 
> yesterday, for about one-tenth of the market value reached at the height of 
> the crisis. This demonstrates the power of public opinion. The consumer 
> rules the nation, whenever he chooses to. If consumers become aware that 
> cold fusion is real, they will insist it be implemented, even though the 
> administration, the oil companies, the DoE and many other powerful 
> institutions will fight prevent that from happening.
> 
> See:
> 
> http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/04/national/04ENER.html?searchpv=past7days
> 
> http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/08/business/08POWE.html
> 
> Some quotes:
> 
> - - - - - - - - - - - -
> 
> Once Braced for a Power Shortage, California Now Finds Itself With a Surplus
> By TIMOTHY EGAN
> 
> . . . rather than days of blackouts, from early May on there has not been a 
> single hour with the lights out since then, and Californians have led the 
> nation in energy conservation. Instead of a scarcity of power, California 
> now has too much, and the state has been selling electricity at a loss or 
> even giving it away.
> 
> But if California proved that it could defy the dire predictions and make 
> of mockery of the energy-guzzling cliché often applied here, the state is 
> still stuck with a huge burden from its disastrous experiment in power 
> deregulation.
> 
> At the core of California's problem is this mystery: How could the state 
> use less electricity this year and last and still pay $35 billion more for 
> it than it did in 1999? . . .
> 
> 
> "People realize now that this was a monumental scam," said Gov. Gray Davis 
> of California in an interview, referring to the freewheeling energy market 
> that ended earlier this year.
> 
> Records show that on some days during the worst of the power troubles, up 
> to a third of the electricity that should have been available was taken off 
> line, creating an artificial shortage that drove up prices, said Loretta 
> Lynch, president of the California Public Utilities Commission.
> "We had plenty of electric power available," Ms. Lynch said. "But we didn't 
> have a cop on the beat." . . .
> 
> Last May, as he unveiled his energy policy, President Bush said the nation 
> was facing the worst energy shortage since the Arab oil embargo of the 
> 1970's. His plan called for building one new power plant every week for the 
> next 20 years, and drilling for oil in new places like the Arctic National 
> Wildlife Refuge.
> 
> At the time, Vice President Dick Cheney said blackouts were a certainty in 
> California and was dismissive of the conservation effort. . . .
> 
> The most optimistic projections had it that 10 percent of ratepayers would 
> take advantage of the pay-to- conserve program. This week, the state 
> released figures showing that more than a third of eligible ratepayers cut 
> their electric use by 20 percent.
> 
> - - - - - - - - - - - -
> 
> Cold fusion would eliminate this kind of nonsense, along with many other 
> nuisances. Good riddance to Enron! I look forward to seeing Exxon, Saudi 
> Arabia and Iran go down the tubes with them. Society has suffered  far too 
> long from their machinations and their inefficient, polluting 19th century 
> technology. I pity the people who will lose their jobs, but the 
> corporations and Sheiks deserve what is coming to them.
> 
> - Jed
> 

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Thu Nov  8 10:56:56 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id KAA24917;
	Thu, 8 Nov 2001 10:49:38 -0800
Resent-Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2001 10:49:38 -0800
Message-ID: <007401c1687d$a792c8e0$3c8f85ce computer>
Reply-To: "Frederick Sparber" <fjsparber earthlink.net>
From: "Frederick Sparber" <fjsparber earthlink.net>
To: <vortex-l eskimo.com>
Subject: Re: Electrogravity Effects with Electret Cubes?
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2001 11:47:39 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Resent-Message-ID: <"KyLw42.0.C56.2Fjwx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45219
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

A recipe for making an Electret consists of melting a mixture of 45% Carnaubra wax,
45% white resin, and 10% white beeswax and allowing it to harden while it is exposed
to an intense electric field.

Based on the Biefield-Brown Effect, one might see a difference in weight when a cube
of this is placed in different orientations on a sensitive scale.

One might try this using a melted down plastic milk carton or pop bottles.  :-)

Regards,   Frederick

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Thu Nov  8 11:14:32 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id LAA10259;
	Thu, 8 Nov 2001 11:13:20 -0800
Resent-Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2001 11:13:20 -0800
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20011108135622.0361ce88 pop.mindspring.com>
X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2001 14:13:12 -0500
To: vortex-l eskimo.com, vortex-l@eskimo.com
From: Jed Rothwell <jedrothwell infinite-energy.com>
Subject: Re: California energy crisis and Enron whither away
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0111081142060.12205-100000 newton.csun.edu>
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20011108102346.036185f8 pop.mindspring.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Resent-Message-ID: <"SLkw41.0.CW2.Fbjwx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45220
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

hank scudder wrote:

>As an LA resident, my incremental rate went up to $.253/kwh last
>summer. We set our thermostat at 85 degrees, and sat around in our
>underware. I started charging my car at school instead of at home, when I 
>could.

Goodness! If that is what most people in California did to cut energy use, 
it was a hardship. However, I followed the story in the San Francisco 
Chronicle and other CA newspapers, and I got the impression that most 
people found more comfortable ways to reduce energy, without sacrificing 
the American Dream or American Hygiene.

Americans often dislike of heat, sweat and body odor. I grew up before air 
conditioners become common, in Washington DC and Okayama Japan, where 
temperatures are often above 85 and the humidity is . . . like a swamp. I 
suppose nowadays houses do not have shady porches and trees, making it 
harder to bear high temperatures, but heat never bothered me. Like FDR, I 
prefer to leave the air conditioner off. But I would not want to impose my 
preferences on people. I would never accuse them of being wimps because 
they prefer to live at 72 deg F all year long. Many conservationists 
endorse the "suffering is good for you" hair shirt philosophy, and they 
want to impose it on the rest of society. Politically, that is a stupid 
approach. People want both comfort and low energy prices. They deserve 
whatever they want, so let us look for a technical solution. Life is hard 
enough. We do not need to make it harder.

- Jed

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Thu Nov  8 13:00:11 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id MAA18871;
	Thu, 8 Nov 2001 12:57:30 -0800
Resent-Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2001 12:57:30 -0800
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2001 14:18:54 -0800 (PST)
From: hank scudder <hjscudde newton.csun.edu>
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Re: California energy crisis and Enron whither away
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20011108135622.0361ce88 pop.mindspring.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0111081404590.12205-100000 newton.csun.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Resent-Message-ID: <"ThPI-.0.nc4.v6lwx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45221
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

Jed
	Hardship is relative: When I was a kid we didn't have
air conditioners either, and in the summer we used to open the fire
hydrants, and run through the spray in our bathing suits, until the police
came and turned them off. Hardship is relative: I love watching my wife
move around in her underwear. 85 is tolerable, more then that is hot. The
price of electricity was set at $0.253 above the average of twice what
the average usage without air conditioning was the previous year. It
ranged from $0.12 for the first 750 kwh, to $0.15/kwh between 750kwh and
1500 kwh, and $0.253 above that, if my memory serves. In the spring and
fall,  I run about 1500 kwh per month with the refrigerator, washer and
dryer. The polititions think air conditioning is a luxury! 

Hank


 On Thu, 8 Nov
2001, Jed Rothwell wrote:

> hank scudder wrote:
> 
> >As an LA resident, my incremental rate went up to $.253/kwh last
> >summer. We set our thermostat at 85 degrees, and sat around in our
> >underware. I started charging my car at school instead of at home, when I 
> >could.
> 
> Goodness! If that is what most people in California did to cut energy use, 
> it was a hardship. However, I followed the story in the San Francisco 
> Chronicle and other CA newspapers, and I got the impression that most 
> people found more comfortable ways to reduce energy, without sacrificing 
> the American Dream or American Hygiene.
> 
> Americans often dislike of heat, sweat and body odor. I grew up before air 
> conditioners become common, in Washington DC and Okayama Japan, where 
> temperatures are often above 85 and the humidity is . . . like a swamp. I 
> suppose nowadays houses do not have shady porches and trees, making it 
> harder to bear high temperatures, but heat never bothered me. Like FDR, I 
> prefer to leave the air conditioner off. But I would not want to impose my 
> preferences on people. I would never accuse them of being wimps because 
> they prefer to live at 72 deg F all year long. Many conservationists 
> endorse the "suffering is good for you" hair shirt philosophy, and they 
> want to impose it on the rest of society. Politically, that is a stupid 
> approach. People want both comfort and low energy prices. They deserve 
> whatever they want, so let us look for a technical solution. Life is hard 
> enough. We do not need to make it harder.
> 
> - Jed
> 

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Thu Nov  8 19:09:01 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id TAA10173;
	Thu, 8 Nov 2001 19:05:47 -0800
Resent-Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2001 19:05:47 -0800
From: dmhnnbqddptfs hotmail.com
Message-Id: <200111091021.fA9ALBt24838 ns.slc.siberia.net>
To: <umcnf5bcnf2 hotmail.com>
Subject: Add REAL Inches To Your Package! GUARANTEED
Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2001 11:21:33 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
Resent-Message-ID: <"d5XqD1.0.pU2.BWqwx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45222
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: RO
X-Status: 

<html>

<body vlink=3D"#0000FF" alink=3D"#0000FF">

<p align=3D"center"><br>
</p>
<div align=3D"center">
  <center>
  <table border=3D"0" width=3D"82%" cellspacing=3D"0" cellpadding=3D"2">
    <tr>
      <td width=3D"100%">
        <p align=3D"center"><b><font face=3D"Arial" size=3D"4">MEN.....Sto=
p Being Ashamed Of Your
        Penis Size!<br>
        Women Get This For Your Boyfriend/Husband&nbsp;<br>
        It <font color=3D"#FF0000"> REALLY WORKS!</font></font></b>
        <p>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td width=3D"100%">
        <p align=3D"center"><a href=3D"http://www.vrsite4.info/1035/add-in=
ches/"><b><font face=3D"Arial" size=3D"5">CLICK HERE NOW TO BE
        AMAZED</font></b></a></td>
    </tr>
  </table>
  </center>
</div>
<p align=3D"center">&nbsp;</p>
<p align=3D"center">&nbsp;</p>
<p align=3D"center"><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</p>
<div align=3D"center">
  <center>
  <table border=3D"0" width=3D"82%" cellspacing=3D"0" cellpadding=3D"2">
    <tr>
      <td width=3D"100%">
        <p align=3D"center"><font size=3D"1">NOTE:&nbsp;
      This email was sent to you because your email is part of a targeted =
opt-in
      list.&nbsp; If you do not wish to receive further mailings, please c=
lick
      below and enter your email at the bottom of the page.&nbsp; You may =
then
      rest-assured that you will never receive another email from us again=
.&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=3D"http://www.removeyou.com/" onmouseover=3D"window.s=
tatus=3D'Remove me!';return true;"><font color=3D"#0000ff" size=3D"2">UNSU=
BSCRIBE
      ME PLEASE</font></a><font color=3D"#000000" size=3D"2"></font>  <fon=
t vgoinojaks yahoo.com</td>
    </tr>
  </table>
  </center>
</div>



<br>                
                                                    
                                                                          =
      
           
                                                                        
                                  
                            

</BODY>
</HTML>


From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Fri Nov  9 13:38:02 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id NAA16866;
	Fri, 9 Nov 2001 13:34:41 -0800
Resent-Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2001 13:34:41 -0800
Message-ID: <3BEC4C0F.C998F55F ix.netcom.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2001 13:35:11 -0800
From: Akira Kawasaki <aki ix.netcom.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en]C-CCK-MCD NSCPCD472  (Win95; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Vortex <vortex-l eskimo.com>
Subject: [Fwd: What's New for Nov 09, 2001]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Resent-Message-ID: <"MkKNq3.0.S74.nl4xx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45223
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: RO
X-Status: 



-------- Original Message --------
Subject: What's New for Nov 09, 2001
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2001 16:27:08 -0500 (EST)
From: "What's New" <whatsnew aps.org>
To: aki ix.netcom.com

WHAT'S NEW   Robert L. Park   Friday, 9 Nov 01   Washington, DC

1. SECRECY: BUSH ASSUMES CONTROL OF PRESIDENTIAL RECORDS.  The
Presidential Records Act of 1978 called for release of most
records 12 years after a president has left office.  However,
President Bush has issued an executive order that reinterprets
the Act to allow a sitting president to block the release of
records of a former president, even if the former president wants
them released.  Dismayed by the order, some historians suggest
that at this critical time the order may be intended to bury past
"dirty tricks" employed by the U.S.  The Reagan Administration
issued a virtually identical order in the 1980s to support claims
of privilege by Richard Nixon, but it was rejected by the courts. 
This new order should meet a similar fate.  The right to know is
easily relinquished in times of crisis but difficult to regain.  

2. NUCLEAR MATERIALS: DOE SAYS "SUBSTANTIAL" AMOUNTS ARE MISSING. 
An audit, begun long before Sept 11, was unable to account for a
lot of the plutonium and uranium loaned to government agencies,
universities, private companies, and hospitals. Sloppy
bookkeeping, rather than deliberate diversion, isx the most
likely explanation, but the war on terrorism has intensified
concerns about control of nuclear materials, and the Department
of Energy is not taking the missing material lightly.  

3. ISS: FINGER POINTING HAS BEGUN IN THE SPACE STATION DEBACLE. 
The findings of the International Space Station Management and
Cost Evaluation Task Force seems to have come as a shock to ISS
supporters (WN 2 Nov 01).  It was left to Sherwood Boehlert (R-
NY), chair of the Science Committee, to explain why we are doing
this: "The nation has already pumped almost $30B into the space
station.  We need to salvage that investment."  Great argument!
Sink another $30B into it and the justification will be twice as
strong.  Meanwhile, Dave Weldon (R-FL), whose district includes
Kennedy Space Center, accused President Bush of "killing space
exploration" by not making more funds available for ISS.  He may
be confusing exploration with human presence, but as near as I
can tell, even with humans we have exhaustively explored low-
Earth orbit.  The APS explained 10 years ago that "scientific
justification is lacking for a permanently manned space station
in earth orbit."  http://aps.org/statements/91.2.html

4. SPACE EXPLORATION: SOLAR-WIND PARTICLE COLLECTION IN TROUBLE.
Scientists had planned for the Genesis space probe to spend 26
months collecting atoms from the solar wind for return to Earth. 
That is real science.  It would be NASA's first sample-return
mission since Apollo.  The Soviets, of course, returned moon
samples as recently as 1976.  Alas, a malfunctioning battery
shield may force a revision of the Genesis mission.  The good
news is that the three year mission cost a mere $259M. 

THE AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY and THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND.
Opinions are the author's and are not necessarily shared by the
American Physical Society or the University, but they should be.

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Fri Nov  9 20:10:35 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id UAA22761;
	Fri, 9 Nov 2001 20:07:53 -0800
Resent-Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2001 20:07:53 -0800
From: Robin van Spaandonk <rvanspaa bigpond.net.au>
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: [THEORY] Hydrino fusion
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2001 15:07:21 +1100
Organization: Improving
Message-ID: <ub9putccl65b13h6kb953o7t3otald9pjh 4ax.com>
X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.553
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id UAA22727
Resent-Message-ID: <"cbCOb2.0.UZ5.PWAxx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45224
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

Hi,

When an AC current is passed through a toroidal coil, the resulting
magnetic field will generate eddy currents in a metal plate which will
then float above the coil.
Suppose that an electron can act as a superconducting plate.
A nucleus that has just absorbed a proton will be in an excited state,
and the resulting internal vibrations will result in a vibrating
magnetic field. If the superconducting electron is close to the nucleus,
then it may be repelled, in the same way as the plate is repelled from
the toroidal coil, converting the excitation energy of the nucleus into
kinetic energy of the electron in the process.

When the proton comes from a severely shrunken hydrino, and the electron
from the hydrino gets left behind, close to the nucleus, this could be a
mechanism for essentially clean fusion, that only produced energetic
electrons.

Calculations revealing why it couldn't work, are invited.


Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/

....Put the "bottom line" at the top!

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Sat Nov 10 04:52:01 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id EAA04885;
	Sat, 10 Nov 2001 04:45:42 -0800
Resent-Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2001 04:45:42 -0800
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2001 07:52:58 -0500 (EST)
From: John Schnurer <herman antioch-college.edu>
To: Robin van Spaandonk <rvanspaa bigpond.net.au>
cc: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [THEORY] Hydrino fusion
In-Reply-To: <ub9putccl65b13h6kb953o7t3otald9pjh 4ax.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1011110074407.8894A-100000 college.antioch-college.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Resent-Message-ID: <"Y_r5l3.0.FC1.s5Ixx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45225
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 




	Dear Robin,


	You begin by passing AC through a toroidal coil.  Then progress to
the observation of a metal plate being repelled by these alternating
fields.

	The repulsion of the metal plate is due to Foucault or "eddy"
(meaning like tiny spinning currents) induced in the plate.   None of this
is the mechanism of a superconductor's Meissner effect.  

	If you use a pole piece for an electromagnet
which has a ring shape ... which is different than a toroidal coil ....
there can be more effective repulsion of a flat metal plate.  Sometimes	
there are demonstrations of flat plate repulsion which show a circular
pole piece and this can often appear or LOOK as though a
toroid with a winding wrapped through it does,... similar to as toroidal
transformer ... but the two are not the same.  In general a toroidal
winding internally expresses field and is not the most effective external,
and hence flat plate repulsion ... source.
 
	Maybe we should examine the beginning of this mind experiment....
keeping in mind the action which causes the flat plate to be repelled.


	It is an idea.

	

On Sat, 10 Nov 2001, Robin van Spaandonk wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> When an AC current is passed through a toroidal coil, the resulting
> magnetic field will generate eddy currents in a metal plate which will
> then float above the coil.
> Suppose that an electron can act as a superconducting plate.
> A nucleus that has just absorbed a proton will be in an excited state,
> and the resulting internal vibrations will result in a vibrating
> magnetic field. If the superconducting electron is close to the nucleus,
> then it may be repelled, in the same way as the plate is repelled from
> the toroidal coil, converting the excitation energy of the nucleus into
> kinetic energy of the electron in the process.
> 
> When the proton comes from a severely shrunken hydrino, and the electron
> from the hydrino gets left behind, close to the nucleus, this could be a
> mechanism for essentially clean fusion, that only produced energetic
> electrons.
> 
> Calculations revealing why it couldn't work, are invited.
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Robin van Spaandonk
> 
> http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/
> 
> ....Put the "bottom line" at the top!
> 

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Sat Nov 10 08:35:13 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id IAA10446;
	Sat, 10 Nov 2001 08:32:41 -0800
Resent-Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2001 08:32:41 -0800
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2001 08:29:07 -0800
From: Jones Beene <jonesb9 pacbell.net>
Subject: Re: [THEORY] Hydrino fusion
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Message-id: <000901c16a04$d28c2d60$aa69fea9 cpq>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-priority: Normal
References: <ub9putccl65b13h6kb953o7t3otald9pjh 4ax.com>
Resent-Message-ID: <"BWAF71.0.8Z2.fQLxx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45226
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

From: "Robin van Spaandonk" <rvanspaa bigpond.net.au>

> A nucleus that has just absorbed a proton will be in an excited state...

Do you really mean proton, not photon? There aren't any probable paths for
any nucleus to absorb a low energy proton - and even with high energy or
near relativistic protons, spallation is far more likely, except for the
single element: boron. The B+H reaction has been tried for years and the
parameters of those experiments could have also produced hydrinos, if they
were that easy to produce, but yet there have been no published anomalies
with boron over the years. So you can't just substitute a hydrino for a
proton in some real world scenario and hope for the best (wouldn't it be
nice?).

Is there any evidence, any evidence at all,  that a putative hydrino, no
matter how shrunken, can be absorbed by any other nucleus, or even fuse with
another hydrino? At least with deuterinos, there is some underlying
rationale and known pathway for fusion (or are you categorizing all shrunken
hydrogen isotopes as hydrinos?)

>When the proton comes from a severely shrunken hydrino, and the electron
from the hydrino gets left behind...

If you agree that there is no present evidence that fusion even occurs, then
why wouldn't a less energetic alternative be more probable? Why wouldn't the
hydrino first absorb its own electron, a form of EC, and become a neutron or
neutrino?  That would eliminate the problem of how a hydrino could first
make it through the inner orbital of the candidate atom.

Or, even if the candidate for such a "close encounter" between a fully
shrunken hydrino and its surroundings - were just a hydrogen ion, why
wouldn't the result of that encounter be a scattering event with a
characteristic photon emission - or if not scattering why wouldn't the
result be at best, two hydrinos both at intermediate shrinkage levels,
instead of a deuteron? You seem to be wanting to piggy-back two highly
improbable events on top of each other to accomplish the desired aim (not
that isn't also one of my favorite ways to day dream!)

J

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Sat Nov 10 15:53:47 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id PAA29559;
	Sat, 10 Nov 2001 15:51:03 -0800
Resent-Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2001 15:51:03 -0800
From: Robin van Spaandonk <rvanspaa bigpond.net.au>
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Re: Particle beam CF in Japan
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2001 10:50:29 +1100
Organization: Improving
Message-ID: <8veruto33p9ele54hdsf0fhqkejolksujm 4ax.com>
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20011106132817.03644ce0 pop.mindspring.com> <5.1.0.14.2.20011106132817.03644ce0@pop.mindspring.com> <fdigutkqg4v8aut9imc5bkqp1gnf4dpchu@4ax.com> <5.1.0.14.2.20011106162858.0364b918@pop.mindspring.com>
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20011106162858.0364b918 pop.mindspring.com>
X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.553
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id PAA29519
Resent-Message-ID: <"K3kb9.0.jD7.crRxx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45227
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

In reply to  Jed Rothwell's message of Tue, 06 Nov 2001 16:47:08 -0500:
[snip]
>If it were not for emeritus professors, cold fusion would have been 
>forgotten five years ago. One of them at JCF was doing a brave job trying 
>to sort out the Brown's Gas claims, working on a shoestring. (Abstract #8). 
>It is a shame to see such talent wasted on such a weak claim.
>
>- Jed
The claim may have been weak, but that doesn't necessarily mean that the
money was wasted. There is an excellent chance that some remediation
does in fact take place with Rhodes' gas, especially as hydrino
formation is very much a possibility (both during generation, and during
combustion).


Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/

....Put the "bottom line" at the top!

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Sat Nov 10 21:00:53 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id UAA32017;
	Sat, 10 Nov 2001 20:57:57 -0800
Resent-Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2001 20:57:57 -0800
From: Robin van Spaandonk <rvanspaa bigpond.net.au>
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [THEORY] Hydrino fusion
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2001 15:57:24 +1100
Organization: Improving
Message-ID: <09urutk76dhevp3hulv1o6vd39nh13lq4f 4ax.com>
References: <ub9putccl65b13h6kb953o7t3otald9pjh 4ax.com> <000901c16a04$d28c2d60$aa69fea9@cpq>
In-Reply-To: <000901c16a04$d28c2d60$aa69fea9 cpq>
X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.553
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id UAA31968
Resent-Message-ID: <"zONcy2.0.5q7.KLWxx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45228
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

In reply to  Jones Beene's message of Sat, 10 Nov 2001 08:29:07 -0800:

>From: "Robin van Spaandonk" <rvanspaa bigpond.net.au>
>
>> A nucleus that has just absorbed a proton will be in an excited state...
>
>Do you really mean proton, not photon? 

I meant proton (as written).

>There aren't any probable paths for
>any nucleus to absorb a low energy proton

A severely shrunken hydrino allows protons to approach sufficiently
close for the absorption time to be reduced to levels where fusion
becomes a reality.
Even if the radius of the hydrino only reduces proportionate to the
quantum number, as Mills purports, the minimum size achievable for a
hydrino would be about 52900/137 ~ 386 fm. Muon induced fusion happens
in less than a nanosecond (probably far less in fact) at 
52900/207 ~ 255 fm, so hydrino induced fusion should still happen at
reasonable rates. 
If Mills is wrong, and the radius shrinks as the *square* of the quantum
number, then far smaller hydrinos are possible, and fusion would be even
faster than when catalyzed by muons.
[snip]
>The B+H reaction has been tried for years and the
>parameters of those experiments could have also produced hydrinos, if they
>were that easy to produce, but yet there have been no published anomalies
>with boron over the years. So you can't just substitute a hydrino for a
>proton in some real world scenario and hope for the best (wouldn't it be
>nice?).

I suspect that the number of hydrinos formed in P+B experiments would
have been so small as to have gone completely unnoticed, because the
conditions in such experiments don't favour the formation of hydrinos.
Furthermore, they need to be confined for considerable periods in order
to ensure that they undergo lots of shrinkage reactions to reduce them
to a satisfactory size. 

>
>Is there any evidence, any evidence at all,  that a putative hydrino, no
>matter how shrunken, can be absorbed by any other nucleus, or even fuse with
>another hydrino? At least with deuterinos, there is some underlying
>rationale and known pathway for fusion (or are you categorizing all shrunken
>hydrogen isotopes as hydrinos?)

Yes, for the sake of simplicity.

>
>>When the proton comes from a severely shrunken hydrino, and the electron
>from the hydrino gets left behind...
>
>If you agree that there is no present evidence that fusion even occurs, then
>why wouldn't a less energetic alternative be more probable? Why wouldn't the
>hydrino first absorb its own electron, a form of EC, and become a neutron or
>neutrino?  That would eliminate the problem of how a hydrino could first
>make it through the inner orbital of the candidate atom.

It can't become a neutron, because it has at least 780 keV too little
energy, and it can't become a neutrino, because a neutrino is a lepton.
However as a small neutral heavy particle (akin to a large neutron), it
shouldn't have too much trouble muscling it's way into an atom, after
all, negative muons and neutrons both seem to manage the feat without
any trouble (one charged, the other not).
Furthermore, as mentioned above, I suspect that stripping reactions
could well be the existing evidence. These reactions have long been
considered anomalous, and hydrinos would provide a very neat solution to
the anomaly.

>
>Or, even if the candidate for such a "close encounter" between a fully
>shrunken hydrino and its surroundings - were just a hydrogen ion, why
>wouldn't the result of that encounter be a scattering event with a
>characteristic photon emission 

In this case, that would probably also be a possible, or even likely
outcome. The likelihood of a fusion event however would increase with
the shrinkage of the hydrino.

>- or if not scattering why wouldn't the
>result be at best, two hydrinos both at intermediate shrinkage levels,
>instead of a deuteron? You seem to be wanting to piggy-back two highly
>improbable events on top of each other to accomplish the desired aim (not
>that isn't also one of my favorite ways to day dream!)

I'm not trying to achieve H+H fusion (too improbable to bother with).
However combinations with other isotopes would be interesting, and
possibly even H + some other atom.
(Possible if the radius goes as the square of the quantum number).

There is however strong evidence that the mechanism I proposed doesn't
work anyway, and that is the fact that it doesn't happen with muon
catalyzed fusion. While strong this evidence is however not conclusive.
If the mechanism I proposed fills in a niche qua reaction time, between
particle emission and photon emission as a means of deexcitation of the
nucleus, then it would not likely be noticed in reactions where particle
emission is possible e.g. D + D -> T + P.

However it might show up in a reaction like D + He4 -> Li6, where it
would be characterised by the appearance of energetic electrons rather
than gamma ray emission. 

(Neither D + He4 -> He5 + P, nor D + He4 -> Li5 + n, are possible).


Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/

....Put the "bottom line" at the top!

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Sat Nov 10 21:19:32 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id VAA06103;
	Sat, 10 Nov 2001 21:18:16 -0800
Resent-Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2001 21:18:16 -0800
From: Robin van Spaandonk <rvanspaa bigpond.net.au>
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [THEORY] Hydrino fusion
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2001 16:17:44 +1100
Organization: Improving
Message-ID: <mb1sutgbs5k31pv1t2tori1v1odk8qmmr9 4ax.com>
References: <ub9putccl65b13h6kb953o7t3otald9pjh 4ax.com> <Pine.GSO.3.96.1011110074407.8894A-100000@college.antioch-college.edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1011110074407.8894A-100000 college.antioch-college.edu>
X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.553
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id VAA06077
Resent-Message-ID: <"CdA0w.0.GV1.OeWxx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45229
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

In reply to  John Schnurer's message of Sat, 10 Nov 2001 07:52:58 -0500:

>
>
>
>	Dear Robin,
>
>
>	You begin by passing AC through a toroidal coil.  Then progress to
>the observation of a metal plate being repelled by these alternating
>fields.
>
>	The repulsion of the metal plate is due to Foucault or "eddy"
>(meaning like tiny spinning currents) induced in the plate.   None of this
>is the mechanism of a superconductor's Meissner effect.  

I see both the Meissner effect and the eddy current repulsion as
examples of Lenz' law. However it isn't necessary that they be the same.
It is only necessary that a superconductor be a good conductor of
electricity, such that it may function as a metal plate. Besides, the
Meissner effect would also result in repulsion of the electron. The real
question is IMO whether or not the effect would be strong enough to
counter the electrostatic attraction of the new nucleus.

>
>	If you use a pole piece for an electromagnet
>which has a ring shape ... which is different than a toroidal coil ....
>there can be more effective repulsion of a flat metal plate.  Sometimes	
>there are demonstrations of flat plate repulsion which show a circular
>pole piece and this can often appear or LOOK as though a
>toroid with a winding wrapped through it does,... similar to as toroidal
>transformer ... but the two are not the same.  In general a toroidal
>winding internally expresses field and is not the most effective external,
>and hence flat plate repulsion ... source.

For a DC current this is certainly true, however an AC current results
in a *changing* field, and this has no trouble inducing eddy currents,
as you pointed out above.

> 
>	Maybe we should examine the beginning of this mind experiment....
>keeping in mind the action which causes the flat plate to be repelled.
>

Nevertheless, I'm more interested in whether *any* such mechanism might
be possible, than in fixing my attention on a specific mechanism.
(IOW I'm more interested in the end than the means).
>
>	It is an idea.

Thanks.

Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/

....Put the "bottom line" at the top!

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Sun Nov 11 19:24:33 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id TAA03626;
	Sun, 11 Nov 2001 19:21:29 -0800
Resent-Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2001 19:21:29 -0800
From: FZNIDARSIC aol.com
Message-ID: <80.12eb1ee0.29209a30 aol.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2001 22:21:20 EST
Subject: BBC and Casimir
To: Puthoff aol.com, vortex-l@eskimo.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows 95 sub 120
Resent-Message-ID: <"caV1c1.0.au.u0qxx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45230
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

On Friday night I listened to a show on the BBC World service. The show was 
an interview with David Bishop.   David Bishop invented a small machine that 
detected the Casimir force.  David Bishop Claimed that no excess energy can 
be produced by such a machine.  His results are reported in the Journal 
Nature.  Audio transcripts may be heard on the BBC world service.  I did not 
get the URL and I could not locate the show on the BBC.  

Frank Z

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Mon Nov 12 02:11:11 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id CAA06122;
	Mon, 12 Nov 2001 02:08:36 -0800
Resent-Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 02:08:36 -0800
Message-ID: <000201c16b5e$9c0118e0$cea8f1c3 p7l2i4>
From: "peter v Noorden" <pjvannrd knmg.nl>
To: <vortex-l eskimo.com>
References: <3.0.1.32.20010729131751.0180955c pop3.club-internet.fr>
Subject: Re: Jean-Pierre Vigier & cold fusion (pt 1)
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 10:22:59 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
Resent-Message-ID: <"KNalz2.0.aV1.a-vxx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45231
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

To Jean-Pierre Lentin,

29 July 2001 you send a message to the vortex group
that you interviewed J.P Vigier and that the article probably
would be online  www.sciences-et-avenir.com. 
Unfortunately I couldn`t find the article. 
Please let me know where the article was published.

Thank you for your cooperation,

Peter van Noorden



From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Mon Nov 12 02:13:54 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id CAA07912;
	Mon, 12 Nov 2001 02:13:27 -0800
Resent-Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 02:13:27 -0800
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 10:02:34 +0000
From: Robert Chambers <robert.chambers baesystems.com>
Subject: Re: BBC and Casimir
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Cc: FZNIDARSIC aol.com, Puthoff@aol.com
Message-id: 
 <"011112101327Z.WT17599. 67*/PN=Robert.Chambers/OU=NOTES/O=BAe Systems and
 Equipment/PRMD=BAE/ADMD=GOLD 400/C=GB/" MHS>
X-Mailer: NetJunction (NetJunction 5.1.1-p0)/MIME
Resent-Message-ID: <"JBnTC3.0.Ux1.73wxx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45232
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

>Audio transcripts may be heard on the BBC world service.  I did not 
>get the URL and I could not locate the show on the BBC.  

The URL is http://www.bb.co.uk/worldservice/programmes/sci-act.shtml and it's 
available to listen (in RealAudio format) until 10:30am GMT on Saturday.

Other useful URLs include:

http://www.physicstoday.org/pt/vol-54/iss-10/p38.html (initial "www" may not be 
necessary)

http://www.lucent.com/press/0201/010209.bla.html

Rob



********************************************************************
This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended
recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender.
You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or
distribute its contents to any other person.
********************************************************************

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Mon Nov 12 04:06:49 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id DAA16240;
	Mon, 12 Nov 2001 03:55:51 -0800
Resent-Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 03:55:51 -0800
Message-ID: <001501c16b68$7fea0ae0$9cb4bfa8 computer>
Reply-To: "Frederick Sparber" <fjsparber earthlink.net>
From: "Frederick Sparber" <fjsparber earthlink.net>
To: "Francis J. Stenger" <fstenger suite224.net>, <vortex-l@eskimo.com>,
        <Little earthtech.org>, <Puthoff@earthtech.org>
Subject: Re: The Role of Atmospheric (free) Electrons in CF/OU Effects?
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 04:54:58 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Resent-Message-ID: <"axYYB3.0.fz3.6Zxxx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45233
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

The surface of the earth has an abundance of free electrons as evidenced by "static
electricity" effects.

With the "Cheshire Cat" type inconsistancies seen in CF/OU effects, one wonders if the
experiments ranging from cavitation to F&P cells, are the result of an excess or
deficiencies of free electrons in the experiments, especially those that involve D2O
or H2O which have a high electron affinity.

Since the electrochemistry of water should change significantly with an excess of free
electrons, one might use a Van De Graaff Generator to load the water with free
electrons in well insulated containers (experiments using battery power supplies) to
see what role the free electrons play.

Even the "bio-transmutation" of potassium to calcium in poultry, reported by Kervran
and others might be because free electrons are readily available from the water, and
clinging to the "dirt" that barnyard chickens feed on.  :-)

Could this be the "Secret Ingredient" that Scott Little was trying to find?   :-)

Regards,   Frederick

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Mon Nov 12 05:41:59 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id FAA21329;
	Mon, 12 Nov 2001 05:39:23 -0800
Resent-Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 05:39:23 -0800
Message-ID: <005801c16b76$f72080e0$9cb4bfa8 computer>
Reply-To: "Frederick Sparber" <fjsparber earthlink.net>
From: "Frederick Sparber" <fjsparber earthlink.net>
To: "Francis J. Stenger" <fstenger suite224.net>, <vortex-l@eskimo.com>,
        <Little earthtech.org>, <Puthoff@earthtech.org>
Subject: Re: The Role of Atmospheric (free) Electrons in CF/OU Effects?
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 06:38:38 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Resent-Message-ID: <"tFydh3.0.6D5.B4zxx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45234
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

It seems plausible that adding the 19th  (atmospheric) electron to the neutral
18-electron cloud of H2O or D2O could cause a charge shift in the molecule that would
be conducive to triggering Hydrino/Deuterino formation.

Is this what is occurring in Sonoluminescence?

Regards,   Frederick

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Mon Nov 12 05:47:07 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id FAA24426;
	Mon, 12 Nov 2001 05:46:34 -0800
Resent-Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 05:46:34 -0800
Message-ID: <006701c16b77$f61f2100$9cb4bfa8 computer>
Reply-To: "Frederick Sparber" <fjsparber earthlink.net>
From: "Frederick Sparber" <fjsparber earthlink.net>
To: "Francis J. Stenger" <fstenger suite224.net>, <vortex-l@eskimo.com>,
        <Little earthtech.org>, <Puthoff@earthtech.org>,
        <rvanspaa bigpond.net.au>, <Ron.Brodzinski@pnl.gov>,
        <storms2 ix.netcom.com>
References: <005801c16b76$f72080e0$9cb4bfa8 computer>
Subject: Re: The Role of Atmospheric (free) Electrons in CF/OU Effects?
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 06:45:44 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Resent-Message-ID: <"uD32M.0.Uz5.wAzxx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45235
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 


Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 6:38 AM
Subject: Re: The Role of Atmospheric (free) Electrons in CF/OU Effects?

Correction.  :-)


> It seems plausible that adding the 11th  (atmospheric) electron to the neutral
> 10-electron cloud of H2O or D2O could cause a charge shift in the molecule that
would
> be conducive to triggering Hydrino/Deuterino formation.
>
> Is this what is occurring in Sonoluminescence?
>
> Regards,   Frederick
>

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Mon Nov 12 06:32:37 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id GAA11215;
	Mon, 12 Nov 2001 06:27:55 -0800
Resent-Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 06:27:55 -0800
Message-Id: <200111121427.JAA18827 mercury.mv.net>
Subject: Gene Mallove on Art Bell show - Evening 11/12-13/01
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 10:28:14 -0500
x-sender: zeropoint-ed pop.mv.net
x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, January 22, 1998
From: "Eugene F. Mallove" <editor infinite-energy.com>
To: "Vortex" <vortex-l eskimo.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Resent-Message-ID: <"hRLu11.0.1l2.hnzxx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45236
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

Gene Mallove will be on the nationwide Art Bell show tonight, Nov.12-13 
(Monday night-Tuesday morning).  (2 a.m.-6 a.m. Eastern US time).  Topics 
to be covered: Cold fusion, aether energy, and more.

Find your nearest affiliate radio station: www.artbell.com  

(Go to "Program" and look up "affiliate station" -- then click on state 
maps, some Canadian stations too).

Best,

Dr. Eugene F. Mallove, Editor-in-Chief
Infinite Energy Magazine
Cold Fusion Technology, Inc.
PO Box 2816
Concord, NH 03302

	Phone: 603-228-4516
	Fax:   603-224-5975
        editor infinite-energy.com

		      http://www.infinite-energy.com

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Mon Nov 12 07:13:56 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id HAA04180;
	Mon, 12 Nov 2001 07:11:00 -0800
Resent-Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 07:11:00 -0800
Message-ID: <005601c16b8e$27d3bb00$15a1a5c2 pc>
From: "Noel Whitney" <quantum iol.ie>
To: <vortex-l eskimo.com>
References: <"011112101327Z.WT17599. 67*/PN=Robert.Chambers/OU=NOTES/O=BAe Systems andEquipment/PRMD=BAE/ADMD=GOLD 400/C=GB/" MHS>
Subject: Re: BBC and Casimir
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 15:24:42 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
Resent-Message-ID: <"hbR6D2.0.911.4Q-xx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45237
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

Robert - the URL you gace for the BBc - Is it correct I cannot raise it ?
I tried inserting bbc rather than just bb on the second try , still no go
Any help appreciated.
----- Original Message -----
From: Robert Chambers <robert.chambers baesystems.com>
To: <vortex-l eskimo.com>
Cc: <FZNIDARSIC aol.com>; <Puthoff@aol.com>
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 10:02 AM
Subject: Re: BBC and Casimir


> >Audio transcripts may be heard on the BBC world service.  I did not
> >get the URL and I could not locate the show on the BBC.
>
> The URL is http://www.bb.co.uk/worldservice/programmes/sci-act.shtml and
it's
> available to listen (in RealAudio format) until 10:30am GMT on Saturday.
>
> Other useful URLs include:
>
> http://www.physicstoday.org/pt/vol-54/iss-10/p38.html (initial "www" may
not be
> necessary)
>
> http://www.lucent.com/press/0201/010209.bla.html
>
> Rob
>
>
>
> ********************************************************************
> This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended
> recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
> recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender.
> You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or
> distribute its contents to any other person.
> ********************************************************************
>
>

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Mon Nov 12 07:17:24 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id HAA08268;
	Mon, 12 Nov 2001 07:16:50 -0800
Resent-Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 07:16:50 -0800
X-Apparently-From: <cjford1 yahoo.com>
Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.20011112090733.00955660 pop.mail.yahoo.com>
X-Sender: cjford1 pop.mail.yahoo.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58 
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 09:16:56 -0600
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
From: Charles Ford <cjford1 yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Gene Mallove on Art Bell show - Evening 11/12-13/01
In-Reply-To: <200111121427.JAA18827 mercury.mv.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Resent-Message-ID: <"wZWtD2.0.112.XV-xx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45238
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: RO
X-Status: 

At 10:28 AM 11/12/01 -0500, you wrote:
>Gene Mallove will be on the nationwide Art Bell show tonight, Nov.12-13
>(Monday night-Tuesday morning).  (2 a.m.-6 a.m. Eastern US time).  Topics
>to be covered: Cold fusion, aether energy, and more.

Tooting your own horn?

Honestly Gene!  ;-)


Charlie Ford

KC5-OWZ
cjford1 yahoo.com
cjford1 swbell.net

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free  yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Mon Nov 12 08:48:19 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id IAA25205;
	Mon, 12 Nov 2001 08:45:47 -0800
Resent-Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 08:45:47 -0800
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 08:42:20 -0800
From: Jones Beene <jonesb9 pacbell.net>
Subject: Re: BBC and Casimir
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Message-id: <002901c16b98$ff7d7e60$aa69fea9 cpq>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-priority: Normal
References: <80.12eb1ee0.29209a30 aol.com>
Resent-Message-ID: <"Ql52o2.0.i96.xo_xx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45239
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

From: <FZNIDARSIC aol.com>


> On Friday night I listened to a show on the BBC World service. The show
was
> an interview with David Bishop.   David Bishop invented a small machine
that
> detected the Casimir force..

What kind of signal was detected (i.e. charge, frequency, pressure, etc) ?

I have searched the BBC website and found nothing

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Mon Nov 12 08:48:35 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id IAA26622;
	Mon, 12 Nov 2001 08:48:12 -0800
Resent-Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 08:48:12 -0800
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20011112114025.02782c58 pop.mindspring.com>
X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 11:48:16 -0500
To: vortex-L eskimo.com
From: Jed Rothwell <jedrothwell infinite-energy.com>
Subject: Re: Particle beam CF in Japan
In-Reply-To: <8veruto33p9ele54hdsf0fhqkejolksujm 4ax.com>
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20011106162858.0364b918 pop.mindspring.com>
 <5.1.0.14.2.20011106132817.03644ce0 pop.mindspring.com>
 <5.1.0.14.2.20011106132817.03644ce0 pop.mindspring.com>
 <fdigutkqg4v8aut9imc5bkqp1gnf4dpchu 4ax.com>
 <5.1.0.14.2.20011106162858.0364b918 pop.mindspring.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Resent-Message-ID: <"kmkDE2.0.pV6.Cr_xx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45240
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

Robin van Spaandonk wrote:

> >If it were not for emeritus professors, cold fusion would have been
> >forgotten five years ago. One of them at JCF was doing a brave job trying
> >to sort out the Brown's Gas claims, working on a shoestring. (Abstract #8).
> >It is a shame to see such talent wasted on such a weak claim.
> >
> >- Jed
>
>The claim may have been weak, but that doesn't necessarily mean that the 
>money was wasted. There is an excellent chance that some remediation does 
>in fact take place with Rhodes' gas, especially as hydrino formation is 
>very much a possibility (both during generation, and during combustion).

Prof. Hanawa would not be able to detect anything like remediation. He can 
barely measure the heat -- which is no easy task. He is only trying to 
measure the energy balance during the production of the gas, which as far 
as I know is not supposed to be over unity. He had a great many problems, 
and so far he has only been able to make a crude estimate that about half 
the input energy is recovered as heat. The rest is presumably carried off 
with the gas. He has not tried igniting the gas. I suggested he try that, 
and I suggested some techniques the Chris Tinsley tried to use, with 
varying success. I predicted that the total heat balance after burning the 
gas would still be under unity, contrary to the "Brown's Gas" claims.

- Jed

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Mon Nov 12 09:19:05 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id JAA11048;
	Mon, 12 Nov 2001 09:14:25 -0800
Resent-Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 09:14:25 -0800
Message-Id: <v01530500b815b31f5293 [12.21.208.163]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 09:28:14 -0900
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner)
Subject: Re: BBC and Casimir
Resent-Message-ID: <"1Ar7b3.0.Yi2.nD0yx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45241
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

At 1:02 AM 11/12/1, Robert Chambers wrote:

>********************************************************************
>This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended
>recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
>recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender.
>You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or
>distribute its contents to any other person.
>********************************************************************


Too late for that!  I have already given public notice that any email sent
to my account will be not be treated as either priviledged or private
except when sent within the terms of a specific prior agreement.

One can not create a completely one sided contract by unilaterally
declaring the contract to be in effect.  It is not reasoable to
deliberately send unsolicited information which the recipient may, by his
own initiative, already posess in part or in whole and then unlaterally and
without compensation claim the right to gag or otherwise constrain or
control the recipient.  This might be in part be excusable if the subject
mailing were accidental, but it seems to me that there is no excuse for
intentionally mailing unsolicited information with a broad and unilateral
claim to the intellectual content.  Further, creating a burden on the
recipient to record or remember what information is confidential and what
is not, and yet to also expend the resources and effort to delete the
unsolicited information, might reasonably be expected to create a burden to
pay for the services so demanded.

Beyond the ethics and legal considerations, it is in the now long standing
spirit of the internet to freely share information disseminated by this
medium, thus it should be no surprise if attempts to unilaterally impose
restrictions on information deliberately disseminated in the medium meet
with resistance and derision.  Hopefully the legal precidents relating to
intellectual property and internet technology will eventually catch up to
and support the principle value of the internet to society - the rapid and
free sharing of information.

Lastly, contributers to archived public newslists like vortex should expect
to be freely and permanently sharing the posted information in public
domain because the lists are automatically archived and the archives are
publically available, and it is not reasonable to expect the newslist
sponsor to have to manually cull such proprietary information from the
archive, especially when the information is deliberately posted by the
author.

Having vented away in this monologue, I'll now concede that it appears the
subject proviso was inadvertantly and automatically sent to the newslist as
an email signature block.  It also contains the qualification "If you are
not the intended recipient ...",  which can logically be assumed to exclude
everyone who receives the post from the proviso, so ... sorry for the
over-reaction, but thanks for the chance to grind my axe a bit on a pet
peve.

Regards,

Horace Heffner          


From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Mon Nov 12 09:55:54 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id JAA01822;
	Mon, 12 Nov 2001 09:53:16 -0800
Resent-Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 09:53:16 -0800
Message-ID: <009f01c16b9a$6e647ee0$9cb4bfa8 computer>
Reply-To: "Frederick Sparber" <fjsparber earthlink.net>
From: "Frederick Sparber" <fjsparber earthlink.net>
To: <Puthoff earthtech.org>, <Little@earthtech.org>, <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Subject: Re: The Role of Atmospheric (free) Electrons in CF/OU Effects?
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 10:51:45 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Resent-Message-ID: <"ERQRm3.0.JS.Co0yx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45242
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 



With the abundance of free electrons around in the atmosphere (replenished by the
Solar wind and ozone layer photodetachment and brought to the earth's surface by
rain)going through a cycle:

1, 4 H2O + 4 Atm Electrons   --->  4 H2O-

2, 4 H2O-  ---> 4 Hydrinos + 4 OH-

3, 4 OH- + 4 H2O --->   4 H2O-  +  2 H2O + O2

4, 4 H2O-   starts a new cycle

Thus you don't need very many "electrostatic electrons" and you don't have to "create"
LL (+/-) pairs.

Regards,   Frederick


From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Mon Nov 12 10:01:51 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id KAA06145;
	Mon, 12 Nov 2001 10:01:08 -0800
Resent-Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 10:01:08 -0800
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 09:57:41 -0800
From: Jones Beene <jonesb9 pacbell.net>
Subject: Re: The Role of Atmospheric (free) Electrons in CF/OU Effects?
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Message-id: <005701c16ba3$8621fc20$aa69fea9 cpq>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-priority: Normal
Resent-Message-ID: <"MD4Ci1.0.tV1.av0yx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45243
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

From: "Frederick Sparber" <fjsparber earthlink.net>

> With the "Cheshire Cat" type inconsistancies seen in CF/OU effects, one
> wonders if the experiments ranging from cavitation to F&P cells, are the
result of an
> excess or deficiencies of free electrons in the experiments, especially
those that
> involve D2O or H2O which have a high electron affinity.

Coincidentally, in regard to your "excess of free electrons," I had been
looking for studies relating to friciton-ionized clusters of inorganic
compounds - which together with water could cause the"magic" 13.6 (27.2) ev
"hole" which R. Mills predicts will catalyze the shrinkage of H below ground
state - this would serve to partially explain some possible heat anomalies
in natural phenomena (such as geysers, hurricanes, hot springs, etc).

There is some interesting data at:

 http://www.aps.org/BAPSMAR98/abs/S1340.html

such as  "Negative Ion Resonances and the 'Electronic Catalyst' ". Of
course,
none of these mention 'below-ground-state' hydrogen.

Mills' research has been focused on positive ions (thus the hole
terminology) - but one wonders if there is there any reason why an *excess*
of electrons, expecially if asymetrical (on the molecular scale), could not
accomplish the same thing (catalysis below ground state)?

In previous posts, you have speculated that in atmospheric phenomena, an
array of neg. LLs around HOH - might create anomalies - although it would
probably require a baker's dozen to total up to Mills'  "magic" catalytic
value   ;-).

Regards,

Jones


From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Mon Nov 12 10:18:06 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id KAA16431;
	Mon, 12 Nov 2001 10:15:35 -0800
Resent-Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 10:15:35 -0800
Message-ID: <02bb01c16ba5$d80d2300$6401a8c0 cs910664a>
From: "Colin Quinney" <crquin home.com>
To: <vortex-l eskimo.com>
References: <200111121427.JAA18827 mercury.mv.net>
Subject: Re: Gene Mallove on Art Bell show - Evening 11/12-13/01
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 13:14:17 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700
Resent-Message-ID: <"pbnxT2.0.a04.771yx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45244
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: RO
X-Status: 

Hi Gene,

I'd like to download that (steaming audio?) from Art Bell's site, but at
some time after the broadcast. There is no way I'll be up at that hour, and
locating a station in Toronto, setting up a recorder etc is too time
consuming. Is it possible to access it from an Archives section at Art
Bell's Web Site at some period after the broadcast??

Best Regards,
Colin Quinney


----- Original Message -----
From: "Eugene F. Mallove" <editor infinite-energy.com>
To: "Vortex" <vortex-l eskimo.com>
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 10:28 AM
Subject: Gene Mallove on Art Bell show - Evening 11/12-13/01


> Gene Mallove will be on the nationwide Art Bell show tonight, Nov.12-13
> (Monday night-Tuesday morning).  (2 a.m.-6 a.m. Eastern US time).  Topics
> to be covered: Cold fusion, aether energy, and more.
>
> Find your nearest affiliate radio station: www.artbell.com
>
> (Go to "Program" and look up "affiliate station" -- then click on state
> maps, some Canadian stations too).
>
> Best,
>
> Dr. Eugene F. Mallove, Editor-in-Chief
> Infinite Energy Magazine
> Cold Fusion Technology, Inc.
> PO Box 2816
> Concord, NH 03302
>
> Phone: 603-228-4516
> Fax:   603-224-5975
>         editor infinite-energy.com
>
>       http://www.infinite-energy.com
>


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.295 / Virus Database: 159 - Release Date: 11/2/2001

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Mon Nov 12 10:24:20 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id KAA20453;
	Mon, 12 Nov 2001 10:23:12 -0800
Resent-Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 10:23:12 -0800
Message-ID: <3BF0138C.E7E5FF27 mindspring.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 13:23:08 -0500
From: sno <sno2 mindspring.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: en,x-ns1siWpfcUINhQ,x-ns2r2d09OnmPe2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Re: Gene Mallove on Art Bell show - Evening 11/12-13/01
References: <200111121427.JAA18827 mercury.mv.net> <02bb01c16ba5$d80d2300$6401a8c0@cs910664a>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Resent-Message-ID: <"f3nD52.0.I_4.FE1yx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45245
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: RO
X-Status: 


You can listen to the archive of the show...
however they have just changed to having you
pay by the month for access....here is link...

http://www.premiereinteractive.com/artbell/listen.php

hope this helps...

steve opelc

Colin Quinney wrote:
> 
> Hi Gene,
> 
> I'd like to download that (steaming audio?) from Art Bell's site, but at
> some time after the broadcast. There is no way I'll be up at that hour, and
> locating a station in Toronto, setting up a recorder etc is too time
> consuming. Is it possible to access it from an Archives section at Art
> Bell's Web Site at some period after the broadcast??
> 
> Best Regards,
> Colin Quinney
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Eugene F. Mallove" <editor infinite-energy.com>
> To: "Vortex" <vortex-l eskimo.com>
> Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 10:28 AM
> Subject: Gene Mallove on Art Bell show - Evening 11/12-13/01
> 
> > Gene Mallove will be on the nationwide Art Bell show tonight, Nov.12-13
> > (Monday night-Tuesday morning).  (2 a.m.-6 a.m. Eastern US time).  Topics
> > to be covered: Cold fusion, aether energy, and more.
> >
> > Find your nearest affiliate radio station: www.artbell.com
> >
> > (Go to "Program" and look up "affiliate station" -- then click on state
> > maps, some Canadian stations too).
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Dr. Eugene F. Mallove, Editor-in-Chief
> > Infinite Energy Magazine
> > Cold Fusion Technology, Inc.
> > PO Box 2816
> > Concord, NH 03302
> >
> > Phone: 603-228-4516
> > Fax:   603-224-5975
> >         editor infinite-energy.com
> >
> >       http://www.infinite-energy.com
> >
> 
> ---
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.295 / Virus Database: 159 - Release Date: 11/2/2001

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Mon Nov 12 10:25:52 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id KAA22804;
	Mon, 12 Nov 2001 10:25:14 -0800
Resent-Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 10:25:14 -0800
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 18:24:42 +0000
From: Josef Karthauser <joe tao.org.uk>
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Re: Gene Mallove on Art Bell show - Evening 11/12-13/01
Message-ID: <20011112182442.D4310 tao.org.uk>
Mail-Followup-To: Josef Karthauser <joe tao.org.uk>,
	vortex-l eskimo.com
References: <200111121427.JAA18827 mercury.mv.net> <02bb01c16ba5$d80d2300$6401a8c0@cs910664a> <3BF0138C.E7E5FF27@mindspring.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="hxkXGo8AKqTJ+9QI"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <3BF0138C.E7E5FF27 mindspring.com>; from sno2@mindspring.com on Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 01:23:08PM -0500
Resent-Message-ID: <"F1Zxv2.0.Da5.9G1yx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45246
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: RO
X-Status: 


--hxkXGo8AKqTJ+9QI
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 01:23:08PM -0500, sno wrote:
>=20
> You can listen to the archive of the show...
> however they have just changed to having you
> pay by the month for access....here is link...
>=20
> http://www.premiereinteractive.com/artbell/listen.php
>=20
> hope this helps...

Can it be listened to over the net live?

Joe

--hxkXGo8AKqTJ+9QI
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iEYEARECAAYFAjvwE+oACgkQXVIcjOaxUBbahACfToHObd2hBaN2AG3XdF3f2yqy
y4MAoIxPZjfKPVUz/XgPflodgeAYYdou
=XkCy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--hxkXGo8AKqTJ+9QI--

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Mon Nov 12 10:28:45 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id KAA24801;
	Mon, 12 Nov 2001 10:28:08 -0800
Resent-Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 10:28:08 -0800
Message-ID: <3BF01583.FCAF48CF bellsouth.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 13:31:31 -0500
From: Terry Blanton <commengr bellsouth.net>
Organization: .
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Re: Gene Mallove on Art Bell show - Evening 11/12-13/01
References: <200111121427.JAA18827 mercury.mv.net> <02bb01c16ba5$d80d2300$6401a8c0@cs910664a>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Resent-Message-ID: <"konEi2.0.P36.tI1yx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45247
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

Colin Quinney wrote:
> 
> Hi Gene,
> 
> I'd like to download that (steaming audio?) from Art Bell's site, but at
> some time after the broadcast. There is no way I'll be up at that hour, and
> locating a station in Toronto, setting up a recorder etc is too time
> consuming. Is it possible to access it from an Archives section at Art
> Bell's Web Site at some period after the broadcast??

Yes, but it's no longer free:

http://www.artbell.com/streamlink.html

Regards,

Terry

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Mon Nov 12 10:52:24 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id KAA06259;
	Mon, 12 Nov 2001 10:49:23 -0800
Resent-Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 10:49:23 -0800
Message-ID: <3BF01751.470DA236 mindspring.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 13:39:13 -0500
From: sno <sno2 mindspring.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: en,x-ns1siWpfcUINhQ,x-ns2r2d09OnmPe2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Re: Gene Mallove on Art Bell show - Evening 11/12-13/01
References: <200111121427.JAA18827 mercury.mv.net> <02bb01c16ba5$d80d2300$6401a8c0@cs910664a> <3BF0138C.E7E5FF27@mindspring.com> <20011112182442.D4310@tao.org.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Resent-Message-ID: <"dTsN1.0.hX1.oc1yx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45248
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 


Sure can....starts at 0100 Eastern....

http://www.artbell.com/audio.html

steve

Josef Karthauser wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 01:23:08PM -0500, sno wrote:
> >
> > You can listen to the archive of the show...
> > however they have just changed to having you
> > pay by the month for access....here is link...
> >
> > http://www.premiereinteractive.com/artbell/listen.php
> >
> > hope this helps...
> 
> Can it be listened to over the net live?
> 
> Joe
>

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Mon Nov 12 11:39:08 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id LAA07379;
	Mon, 12 Nov 2001 11:36:25 -0800
Resent-Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 11:36:25 -0800
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 19:35:52 +0000
From: Josef Karthauser <joe tao.org.uk>
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Re: Gene Mallove on Art Bell show - Evening 11/12-13/01
Message-ID: <20011112193552.F4310 tao.org.uk>
Mail-Followup-To: Josef Karthauser <joe tao.org.uk>,
	vortex-l eskimo.com
References: <200111121427.JAA18827 mercury.mv.net> <02bb01c16ba5$d80d2300$6401a8c0@cs910664a> <3BF0138C.E7E5FF27@mindspring.com> <20011112182442.D4310@tao.org.uk> <3BF01751.470DA236@mindspring.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="TU+u6i6jrDPzmlWF"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <3BF01751.470DA236 mindspring.com>; from sno2@mindspring.com on Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 01:39:13PM -0500
Resent-Message-ID: <"--0YW1.0.1p1.tI2yx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45249
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 


--TU+u6i6jrDPzmlWF
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 01:39:13PM -0500, sno wrote:
>=20
> Sure can....starts at 0100 Eastern....
>=20
> http://www.artbell.com/audio.html

What's that in GMT?

Joe

--TU+u6i6jrDPzmlWF
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iEYEARECAAYFAjvwJJgACgkQXVIcjOaxUBZKygCg5KrFfGnO0ZDYklIKiBty9lFp
8OMAoI2CxpaVSFvCad6dzZBX3ZX6jS4n
=f/5x
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--TU+u6i6jrDPzmlWF--

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Mon Nov 12 12:07:03 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id MAA25905;
	Mon, 12 Nov 2001 12:03:54 -0800
Resent-Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 12:03:54 -0800
From: Hypercom59 aol.com
Message-ID: <62.16d612a5.29218523 aol.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 15:03:47 EST
Subject: Re: Gene Mallove on Art Bell show - Evening 11/12-13/01
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: AOL 5.0 for Windows sub 124
Resent-Message-ID: <"zPSC32.0.aK6.fi2yx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45250
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

Best Of Luck Gene.

I will be listening.

Chris

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Mon Nov 12 12:12:11 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id MAA29993;
	Mon, 12 Nov 2001 12:11:08 -0800
Resent-Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 12:11:08 -0800
Message-ID: <3BEFE687.2112E0C7 mindspring.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 15:11:03 +0000
From: sno <sno2 mindspring.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: en,x-ns1siWpfcUINhQ,x-ns2r2d09OnmPe2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Re: Gene Mallove on Art Bell show - Evening 11/12-13/01
References: <200111121427.JAA18827 mercury.mv.net> <02bb01c16ba5$d80d2300$6401a8c0@cs910664a> <3BF0138C.E7E5FF27@mindspring.com> <20011112182442.D4310@tao.org.uk> <3BF01751.470DA236@mindspring.com> <20011112193552.F4310@tao.org.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Resent-Message-ID: <"toGEF2.0.XK7.Rp2yx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45251
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 


Can change it to whatever you desire...
time zone converter link....

http://www.timezoneconverter.com/

steve

Josef Karthauser wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 01:39:13PM -0500, sno wrote:
> >
> > Sure can....starts at 0100 Eastern....
> >
> > http://www.artbell.com/audio.html
> 
> What's that in GMT?
> 
> Joe
> 
>   ------------------------------------------------------------
>    Part 1.2Type: application/pgp-signature

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Mon Nov 12 12:38:02 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id MAA15294;
	Mon, 12 Nov 2001 12:35:07 -0800
Resent-Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 12:35:07 -0800
From: Robin van Spaandonk <rvanspaa bigpond.net.au>
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Re: The Role of Atmospheric (free) Electrons in CF/OU Effects?
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 07:34:39 +1100
Organization: Improving
Message-ID: <lbc0vt0ejhgr4ipcsivbdnb4j0pgklonnl 4ax.com>
References: <005801c16b76$f72080e0$9cb4bfa8 computer> <006701c16b77$f61f2100$9cb4bfa8@computer>
In-Reply-To: <006701c16b77$f61f2100$9cb4bfa8 computer>
X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.553
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id MAA15256
Resent-Message-ID: <"Y9tIF3.0.qk3.x93yx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45252
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: RO
X-Status: 

In reply to  Frederick Sparber's message of Mon, 12 Nov 2001 06:45:44
-0600:
[snip]
>> Is this what is occurring in Sonoluminescence?
[snip]
Sonoluminescence in water may involve hydrinos, however if so, then I
think the catalyst is more likely to be H atoms, O atoms, and O++ ions,
all of which can provide energy holes of an approximate multiple of 27.2
eV.

Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/

....Put the "bottom line" at the top!

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Mon Nov 12 13:24:56 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id NAA15324;
	Mon, 12 Nov 2001 13:22:25 -0800
Resent-Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 13:22:25 -0800
Message-Id: <200111122122.QAA18798 mercury.mv.net>
Subject: Re: Gene Mallove on Art Bell show - Evening 11/12-13/01
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 17:22:44 -0500
x-sender: zeropoint-ed pop.mv.net
x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, January 22, 1998
From: "Eugene F. Mallove" <editor infinite-energy.com>
To: "Vortex" <vortex-l eskimo.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Resent-Message-ID: <"4dGog.0.6l3.Gs3yx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45253
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: RO
X-Status: 

>Hi Gene,
>
>I'd like to download that (steaming audio?) from Art Bell's site, but at
>some time after the broadcast. There is no way I'll be up at that hour, and
>locating a station in Toronto, setting up a recorder etc is too time
>consuming. Is it possible to access it from an Archives section at Art
>Bell's Web Site at some period after the broadcast??
>
>Best Regards,
>Colin Quinney


Yeah, but I think they'll make you pay now  :)

Gene

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Mon Nov 12 13:39:54 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id NAA25947;
	Mon, 12 Nov 2001 13:37:36 -0800
Resent-Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 13:37:36 -0800
Message-ID: <003501c16bc2$0b1fb7a0$6401a8c0 cs910664a>
From: "Colin Quinney" <crquin home.com>
To: <vortex-l eskimo.com>
References: <200111122122.QAA18798 mercury.mv.net>
Subject: Re: Gene Mallove on Art Bell show - Evening 11/12-13/01
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 16:36:09 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700
Resent-Message-ID: <"T5IEq2.0.HL6.V44yx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45254
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: RO
X-Status: 

Ouch. $6.95 per month via the Web.

Does anybody in the Toronto area know which radio station I can find the Art
Bell Show on?

Colin Quinney

> >I'd like to download that (steaming audio?) from Art Bell's site, but at
> >some time after the broadcast. There is no way I'll be up at that hour,
and
> >locating a station in Toronto, setting up a recorder etc is too time
> >consuming. Is it possible to access it from an Archives section at Art
> >Bell's Web Site at some period after the broadcast??
>
>
> Yeah, but I think they'll make you pay now  :)
>
> Gene
>
>


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.295 / Virus Database: 159 - Release Date: 11/1/2001

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Mon Nov 12 13:50:54 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id NAA01034;
	Mon, 12 Nov 2001 13:48:18 -0800
Resent-Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 13:48:18 -0800
Message-ID: <3BF0446C.655D57AD bellsouth.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 16:51:40 -0500
From: Terry Blanton <commengr bellsouth.net>
Organization: .
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Re: Gene Mallove on Art Bell show - Evening 11/12-13/01
References: <200111122122.QAA18798 mercury.mv.net> <003501c16bc2$0b1fb7a0$6401a8c0@cs910664a>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Resent-Message-ID: <"BFyva.0.4G.YE4yx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45255
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

Colin Quinney wrote:
> 
> Ouch. $6.95 per month via the Web.
> 
> Does anybody in the Toronto area know which radio station I can find the Art
> Bell Show on?

MOJO Radio, 640 am.  Check the schedule, some stations time
delay.

Regards,

Terry

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Mon Nov 12 14:36:18 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id OAA29015;
	Mon, 12 Nov 2001 14:33:40 -0800
Resent-Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 14:33:40 -0800
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 17:41:21 -0500 (EST)
From: John Schnurer <herman antioch-college.edu>
To: Vortex <vortex-l eskimo.com>
Subject: A little help
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1011112173441.1542K-100000 college.antioch-college.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Resent-Message-ID: <"Am5BI.0.H57.4v4yx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45256
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 




	Dear Vo.,


	I have been trying to query the community about non coal, oil and
nuclear fuel.

	Some of the feedback is ...in my opinion ... a little defeatist.

	Open to forum:   

	Can you help to show some main stream through off-the-beaten-track
methods of energy conversion or sources.

	See some of the "answers" of "can't be done" community; 


In short, we have discovered that solar PV (conventional) has an emergy of 
0.41 according to H. T. Odum, which means it actually delivers in its 
lifetime 41% of the total energy consumed by its manufacture, maintenance 
and disposal. Even if you could double the efficiency by using DEC, you 
would still not break even.

	DEC = Direct Energy Conversion

-----------------------------------

	"...... there is insufficient time and remaining energy now to
change the trillions of dollars of infrastructure enough to prevent a
massive dieoff of billions of people as the energy decline strangles
agriculture and the economy generally. ....." 

---------------------------------


	Does anyone have any alternative suggestions?


							JS

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Mon Nov 12 14:44:47 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id OAA02060;
	Mon, 12 Nov 2001 14:43:23 -0800
Resent-Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 14:43:23 -0800
Message-ID: <000d01c16bcb$6b27fb40$e410d340 usadatanet.net>
From: "Ryan Hopkins" <thebishop usadatanet.net>
To: <vortex-l eskimo.com>
References: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1011112173441.1542K-100000 college.antioch-college.edu>
Subject: Re: A little help
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 17:43:14 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
Resent-Message-ID: <"1NrC13.0.qV.925yx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45257
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

John Schnurer said;
<<Can you help to show some main stream through off-the-beaten-track
methods of energy conversion or sources.>>

www.theverylastpageoftheinternet.com
see the Muller motor/generator section.  This guy's design apparently
outputs 300amps   100% duty cycle with pulsed input of about 36amps.  It
uses amorphous steel in the cores of the pick-up coils, which leads to near
zero magnetic drag, and high strength NdFeB magnets, which leads to
high-speed and high amperage.
I'm in the process of replicating the Muller generator on a smaller scale.

It's not exactly mainstream, but it's a proven design and the money you put
into it will be returned.  Say you have a house - electyricity is expensive!
But if you make your own and phase-match it to the main line, the power
company (thanks to deregulation) is required by law to buy back the energy
you don't use.  This is the epitome of the term 'energizer bunny.'

cheers =)

Ryan Hopkins

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Mon Nov 12 14:48:47 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id OAA05731;
	Mon, 12 Nov 2001 14:48:17 -0800
Resent-Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 14:48:17 -0800
Message-ID: <3BF00B59.CA294338 mindspring.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 17:48:09 +0000
From: sno <sno2 mindspring.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: en,x-ns1siWpfcUINhQ,x-ns2r2d09OnmPe2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Re: A little help
References: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1011112173441.1542K-100000 college.antioch-college.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Resent-Message-ID: <"m-6gg2.0.NP1.n65yx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45258
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 


It would appear to me that wind power has a 
much better chance then solar at the moment...

The initial cost per watt is a lot lower...and
since wind can blow 24 hrs a day can produce
more power per hour.....no storage needed...
also takes up much less land area per watt....

Am talking wind farms...not individual generators...

steve 

John Schnurer wrote:
> 
>         Dear Vo.,
> 
>         I have been trying to query the community about non coal, oil and
> nuclear fuel.
> 
>         Some of the feedback is ...in my opinion ... a little defeatist.
> 
>         Open to forum:
> 
>         Can you help to show some main stream through off-the-beaten-track
> methods of energy conversion or sources.
> 
>         See some of the "answers" of "can't be done" community;
> 
> In short, we have discovered that solar PV (conventional) has an emergy of
> 0.41 according to H. T. Odum, which means it actually delivers in its
> lifetime 41% of the total energy consumed by its manufacture, maintenance
> and disposal. Even if you could double the efficiency by using DEC, you
> would still not break even.
> 
>         DEC = Direct Energy Conversion
> 
> -----------------------------------
> 
>         "...... there is insufficient time and remaining energy now to
> change the trillions of dollars of infrastructure enough to prevent a
> massive dieoff of billions of people as the energy decline strangles
> agriculture and the economy generally. ....."
> 
> ---------------------------------
> 
>         Does anyone have any alternative suggestions?
> 
>                                                         JS

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Mon Nov 12 15:03:38 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id PAA14686;
	Mon, 12 Nov 2001 15:01:06 -0800
Resent-Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 15:01:06 -0800
Message-ID: <011401c16bc5$6ec33220$9cb4bfa8 computer>
Reply-To: "Frederick Sparber" <fjsparber earthlink.net>
From: "Frederick Sparber" <fjsparber earthlink.net>
To: "Francis J. Stenger" <fstenger suite224.net>, <Little@earthtech.org>,
        <vortex-l eskimo.com>
Subject: Re: The Role of Atmospheric (free) Electrons in CF/OU Effects?
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 15:59:16 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Resent-Message-ID: <"jXtCs.0.Mb3.oI5yx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45259
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

Question:

How much charge can be "sparged" into a liter of water from the sphere of a Van De
Graaff running at 250 Kilovolts, if the water (glass?)vessel is setting on a very good
electrical insulator and is being stirred with a very good insulating spoon?

Bill Beaty still on vortex?  :-)

Regards,    Frederick

Regards,    Frederick

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Mon Nov 12 16:31:12 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id QAA01807;
	Mon, 12 Nov 2001 16:28:10 -0800
Resent-Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 16:28:10 -0800
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 19:35:48 -0500 (EST)
From: John Schnurer <herman antioch-college.edu>
To: FZNIDARSIC aol.com
cc: Puthoff aol.com, vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: BBC and Casimir ...tear the door off your car....
In-Reply-To: <80.12eb1ee0.29209a30 aol.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1011112190050.1542Q-100000 college.antioch-college.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Resent-Message-ID: <"RBE1M.0.9S.Qa6yx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45260
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 




	Dear Vo.,


	If you have two conductive plates that are one Nano meter
apart.... the calculations of the Casimir Effect Force or CEF, indicate
the "push" is about equal to 1 atmosphere... or 14.7 to 15.2 pounds per
square inch.

	Once the two surfaces are together then you will either have to:

	A) spend energy to get them apart...

	B)  or shield them from the CEF so you can get them apart without
		spending energy. 

	According to some CEF descriptions... if you made
or convex-"looking-at"-convex surfaces .... the CEF will be apart... and
concave-concave and the CEF will be together.

	It would then seem that clever shaping of surfaces will allow one
to make a CEF "motor"

	Maybe this will be good to move a lot of little things on a small
scale that will add up to big stuff on a large scale...

	In any event the general commonality of the description of the CEF
teach about the force of electromagnetic waves, or EM, on conductors.
	If there is-are extant a lot of EM locally then this would seem to
say you may have a good CEF... if there was little EM, then maybe poor CEF
....
	The question that comes to mind with many Applied Sciences is what
will I have to do to make a "gooframis" that does some good body of work.

	Example:	If I go down to the auto part place I can buy a
really heavy lead-acid car battery.... and if it say, a 100 US dollar one,
then it might be a 12 volts and 500 ampere crank and this baby will, if
connected to a heavy starter motor, and the motor is connected to 
a suitable windlass ...literally rip the door off a car.
	THIS is Applied Sciences Engineering.  Granted you have to charge
this up... but the idea is the battery, heavy, poisonous and clunky is
capable of doing some real work.  

	NOW.... what are some of the "off the beaten track" things we
could use or work with that also are able to "Do Some Real Work"... and
let us sort of pare down the car battery.... 12 volts at 500 amps to be 10
volts at 500 amps, or almost any USEFUL ratio of that, such as 100 volts
and 50 amps... THIS is 5,000 watts.


	I maintain DEC, or Direct Energy Conversion, is capable of
delivering this type of electrical power from sources of energy that are
not particularly agressively exploited today.

One may wind up with something kind of clunky ... but being poisonous is
not considered acceptable .... but something which can do the job.

	One example is to take a second look at Photo-to-Electric
conversion.

	Silicon cells are sell known and run at 10 to 12 percents, mainly
because they only use a sort of narrow slice of the optical spectrum from
the sun.   
	What if the utility went to 80 to 85 percents of the sun's energy?

	One example of how do do this... is to "Get a Little Clunky"
	
	Using dye sensitized titanium Oxide photo voltaic cells the
optical bandwidth can be widened from the 850 to 980 slot, peaking at
about 880 to 900 for silicon, to 400 to 980 for dye-Ti systems.  

	I would like to know if any other Vos know of Useful conversion
methods, or have suggestions of methods that need a little developmental
help.

	If you know of parties that have serious commercial interest in
conversion methods that do real work, please contact me off line.

	Any of these methods that are infant or even teenagers i will try
to put out here on vortex so everyone has a chance at either helping them
get beeter, or making them part of a real world system or in general
contributing.

	As matters stand now TiO photo catalytic action of breaking water
into H2 and O2 is ...according to the literature, at the 59 to 63 percent
absolute quantum efficiency ... this of course would have to go to a fuel
cell or be used as fuel, but anything over 50 percent seems pretty good to
me.

				J


On Sun, 11 Nov 2001 FZNIDARSIC aol.com wrote:

> On Friday night I listened to a show on the BBC World service. The show was 
> an interview with David Bishop.   David Bishop invented a small machine that 
> detected the Casimir force.  David Bishop Claimed that no excess energy can 
> be produced by such a machine.  His results are reported in the Journal 
> Nature.  Audio transcripts may be heard on the BBC world service.  I did not 
> get the URL and I could not locate the show on the BBC.  
> 
> Frank Z
> 

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Mon Nov 12 17:58:46 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id RAA16719;
	Mon, 12 Nov 2001 17:54:13 -0800
Resent-Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 17:54:13 -0800
Message-ID: <3BF07D7A.D4A81DD enter.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 20:55:06 -0500
From: David Rosignoli <drdaveor enter.net>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (Win98; I)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Re: BBC and Casimir ...tear the door off your car....
References: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1011112190050.1542Q-100000 college.antioch-college.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Resent-Message-ID: <"QtEzu1.0.o44.3r7yx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45261
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

See my comments below:

John Schnurer wrote:
> 
>  
>         One example is to take a second look at Photo-to-Electric
> conversion.
> 
>         Silicon cells are sell known and run at 10 to 12 percents, mainly
> because they only use a sort of narrow slice of the optical spectrum from
> the sun.

Other types of cells, such as GaAs, can reach higher efficiencies. As
high as 20-30 percent.

>         What if the utility went to 80 to 85 percents of the sun's energy?
> 
>         One example of how do do this... is to "Get a Little Clunky"
> 
>         Using dye sensitized titanium Oxide photo voltaic cells the
> optical bandwidth can be widened from the 850 to 980 slot, peaking at
> about 880 to 900 for silicon, to 400 to 980 for dye-Ti systems.

The idea of increasing the spectrum of solar cells is not a new one. I
remember going to the Extraordinary Science conference in 1991 and
hearing the billioniare Japanese inventor Dr. Yoshiro Nakamatsu give a
talk on his new energy device that supposedly did something similar to
what you are describing. Unfortunately, I don't remember the details and
don't have any references. :-(

> 
>         I would like to know if any other Vos know of Useful conversion
> methods, or have suggestions of methods that need a little developmental
> help.
>

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Mon Nov 12 20:05:00 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id UAA14283;
	Mon, 12 Nov 2001 20:01:57 -0800
Resent-Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 20:01:57 -0800
Message-ID: <000d01c16bf7$c241a260$6401a8c0 cs910664a>
From: "Colin Quinney" <crquin home.com>
To: <vortex-l eskimo.com>
References: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1011112173441.1542K-100000 college.antioch-college.edu>
Subject: Re: A little help
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 21:51:45 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700
Resent-Message-ID: <"IN_z3.0.zU3.ri9yx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45262
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

----- Original Message -----
From: "John Schnurer" <herman antioch-college.edu>
To: "Vortex" <vortex-l eskimo.com>
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 5:41 PM
Subject: A little help

> Dear Vo.,
>
> I have been trying to query the community about non coal, oil and
> nuclear fuel.
>
>
> Open to forum:
>
> Can you help to show some main stream through off-the-beaten-track
> methods of energy conversion or sources.
>
> Does anyone have any alternative suggestions?
>
> JS
>

Only mainstream, John?

NATURE  science updates:

http://www.nature.com/nsu/011108/011108-5.html

Solar cells might one day be produced by the roll, as cheaply and easily as
wallpaper. Scientists in Arizona are using screen-printing, a technique
developed for patterning fabrics, to produce plastic solar cells[1].

The technique is another step towards the general availability of solar
power from flexible devices on plastic sheets or glass panels. The basic
materials of a photovoltaic cell are inexpensive, but combining them into a
working device is currently costly. This limits our exploitation of the
sun's potential to provide clean energy.

The organic cells manufactured by Ghassan Jabbour and colleagues at the
University of Arizona in Tucson have about a quarter of the efficiency of
commercial silicon devices (which turn 10-20 per cent of light energy into
electricity). But, being cheap to produce, they can make up in quantity what
they lack in quality.

In conventional screen-printing, a taut piece of fabric, patterned by
masking some areas with substances such as wax that repel colouring agents,
is covered with ink or dye. The screen is then held horizontally over the
object to be printed, and a rubber blade is swept across the back, pressing
the coloured surface down to produce an image.

Jabbour's group print very flat, very thin cells onto glass in a similar
way. First, they coat the glass with a transparent, electrically conducting
material that acts as one of the solar cell's electrodes. On top of this,
they lay down a thin film of a polymer, which helps to gather current from
the photovoltaic material.

Finally, they deposit a blend of two organic compounds that convert light
into electricity. One, a carbon-based molecule called a fullerene, produces
charged particles that carry an electrical current when light shines onto
the molecules. The other, a polymer, ferries the current to electrodes on
the top and bottom of the cell.

Under blue light, these screen-printed solar cells have an efficiency of 4.3
per cent. They are probably less efficient for white sunlight, so there is
work to be done before the devices are good enough for commercial use.

Organic solar cells were first reported last year by Bell Labs in the United
States[2]. These latest screen-printed cells are based on prototypes made by
team member Sean Shaheen and colleagues earlier this year[3].


References
1./  Shaheen, S. E., Radspinner, R., Peyghambarian, N. & Jabbour, G. E.
Fabrication of bulk heterojunction plastic solar cells by screen printing.
Applied Physics Letters, 79, 2996 - 2998, (2001).

2./  Schon, J. H., Kloc, C.H. & Batlogg, B. Efficient photovoltaic energy
conversion in pentacene-based heterojunctions. Applied Physics Letters, 77,
2473 - 2475, (2000).
Shaheen, S. E. et al. 2.5% efficient organic plastic solar cells. Applied
Physics Letters, 78, 841 - 843, (2001).

3./  Shaheen, S. E. et al. 2.5% efficient organic plastic solar cells.
Applied Physics Letters, 78, 841 - 843, (2001).

MORE:

. Solar power surge (34%)
10 August 2001
http://www.nature.com/nsu/010816/010816-3.html

. More power from plastic (2.5%)
9 February 2001
http://www.nature.com/nsu/010215/010215-9.html

. Solar power goes organic (4.5%)
23 October 2000
http://www.nature.com/nsu/010215/010215-9.html

. Taking a leaf out of nature's book
25 July 2000
http://www.nature.com/nsu/000727/000727-5.html

 © Nature News Service / Macmillan Magazines Ltd 2001


cq


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.295 / Virus Database: 159 - Release Date: 11/1/2001

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Mon Nov 12 22:01:35 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id VAA28660;
	Mon, 12 Nov 2001 21:57:06 -0800
Resent-Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 21:57:06 -0800
From: dtmiller midiowa.net (Dean T. Miller)
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Re: Gene Mallove on Art Bell show - Evening 11/12-13/01
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 04:56:22 GMT
Organization: Miller and Associates
Message-ID: <3bf1a7d5.10173635 mail.midiowa.net>
References: <200111122122.QAA18798 mercury.mv.net> <003501c16bc2$0b1fb7a0$6401a8c0@cs910664a> <3BF0446C.655D57AD@bellsouth.net>
In-Reply-To: <3BF0446C.655D57AD bellsouth.net>
X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.5/32.452
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id VAA28636
Resent-Message-ID: <"AYQmm1.0.i_6.mOByx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45263
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

Also, some of the stations carrying the show put it onto the 'net --
FOR FREE!

On Mon, 12 Nov 2001 16:51:40 -0500, Terry Blanton
<commengr bellsouth.net> wrote:

>Colin Quinney wrote:
>> 
>> Ouch. $6.95 per month via the Web.
>> 
>> Does anybody in the Toronto area know which radio station I can find the Art
>> Bell Show on?
>
>MOJO Radio, 640 am.  Check the schedule, some stations time
>delay.
>
>Regards,
>
>Terry

-- Dean -- from (almost) Des Moines -- KB0ZDF

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Tue Nov 13 01:31:32 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id BAA03459;
	Tue, 13 Nov 2001 01:28:52 -0800
Resent-Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 01:28:52 -0800
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 09:21:38 +0000
From: Robert Chambers <robert.chambers baesystems.com>
Subject: Re: BBC and Casimir
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Message-id: 
 <"011113092934Z.WT25115. 18*/PN=Robert.Chambers/OU=NOTES/O=BAe Systems and
 Equipment/PRMD=BAE/ADMD=GOLD 400/C=GB/" MHS>
X-Mailer: NetJunction (NetJunction 5.1.1-p0)/MIME
Resent-Message-ID: <"d9Ck83.0.ur.KVEyx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45264
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

Noel Whitney wrote:

>Robert - the URL you gace for the BBc - Is it correct I cannot raise it ?
>I tried inserting bbc rather than just bb on the second try , still no go

Sorry, it should be BBC.co.uk. If you can't get to it directly, go to http://www.
bbc.co.uk/worldservice and look for references to "Science in Action" - 
IIRC there's a dropdown list of the main shows on the World Service there. I doubt 
whether there's much to it that isn't already covered by the other URLs
I gave, though.

BTW sorry about the legalese - it's automatically attached to all emails from this 
domain.

Rob



********************************************************************
This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended
recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender.
You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or
distribute its contents to any other person.
********************************************************************

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Tue Nov 13 02:36:20 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id CAA24272;
	Tue, 13 Nov 2001 02:33:44 -0800
Resent-Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 02:33:44 -0800
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 10:33:10 +0000
From: Josef Karthauser <joe tao.org.uk>
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Re: Gene Mallove on Art Bell show - Evening 11/12-13/01
Message-ID: <20011113103310.B16812 tao.org.uk>
Mail-Followup-To: Josef Karthauser <joe tao.org.uk>,
	vortex-l eskimo.com
References: <200111122122.QAA18798 mercury.mv.net> <003501c16bc2$0b1fb7a0$6401a8c0@cs910664a> <3BF0446C.655D57AD@bellsouth.net> <3bf1a7d5.10173635@mail.midiowa.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="CUfgB8w4ZwR/yMy5"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <3bf1a7d5.10173635 mail.midiowa.net>; from dtmiller@midiowa.net on Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 04:56:22AM +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <"zX6mS.0.Ax5.8SFyx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45265
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 


--CUfgB8w4ZwR/yMy5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 04:56:22AM +0000, Dean T. Miller wrote:
> Also, some of the stations carrying the show put it onto the 'net --
> FOR FREE!

Please tell me which ones.  I over slept and didn't manage to get up at
6am as I'd planned to listen to it over the net. Now I'll need to listen
to it on archive somewhere.  Any pointers would be very greatly
received.

Joe

--CUfgB8w4ZwR/yMy5
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iEYEARECAAYFAjvw9uYACgkQXVIcjOaxUBbyOQCfeuM3n8uoUd4/iJO8Btatyhzu
+IUAoIgiYrGuMpchxk1T2Te6ZqchxGhb
=+m68
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--CUfgB8w4ZwR/yMy5--

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Tue Nov 13 08:39:57 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id IAA31356;
	Tue, 13 Nov 2001 08:37:11 -0800
Resent-Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 08:37:11 -0800
Message-ID: <017101c16c58$f5c784e0$9cb4bfa8 computer>
Reply-To: "Frederick Sparber" <fjsparber earthlink.net>
From: "Frederick Sparber" <fjsparber earthlink.net>
To: <vortex-l eskimo.com>
Subject: Re: Quasi-neutrons from Atmospheric Electrons in Water
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 09:36:20 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Resent-Message-ID: <"zEwbv2.0.rf7.smKyx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45266
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

Hi Jones.

The natural self-ionization of water should make it amenable to catalyzation to
Quasi-neutrons (Qn) by "uncommitted" Atmospheric Electrons:

1, 2 H2O <---> H3O+  +  OH-

2, Atm e-  +  H3O+  + OH-  --->  Qn + H2O + OH-

This makes the electron on the OH- ion "surplus" so that
it can create another Qn:

OH-  +  H3O+   --->  Qn  +  H2O  +  OH  +  OH-

The neutral OH Radicals will eventually form H2O and O2, but the "uncommitted"
electron will remain as a catalyst:

4 OH  --->  2 H2O +  O2

The Quasineutrons can tunnel into any nucleus to effect nuclear
reactions/transmutations in addition to the OU heat given off in their formation.

In the case of D2O:

2 D2O <--> D3O+  +  OD-

The same cycle applies, but in this case the "proton end" of the deuteron becomes
neutral, thus making it neutral so that it too can tunnel into any nucleus and effect
CF/OU reactions.

I might be interested in funding some preliminary activity
to see how much Net Charge can be added to a vessel of
H2O and how much this charge effects the pH of the water etc.

If you are interested let me know privately.

Regards,   Frederick

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Tue Nov 13 09:24:28 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id JAA21856;
	Tue, 13 Nov 2001 09:21:09 -0800
Resent-Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 09:21:09 -0800
X-Originating-IP: [209.249.70.148]
From: "Mark Goldes" <mgoldes msn.com>
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Re: Muller's work
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 09:20:36 -0800
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Message-ID: <F5N1aJPIGrYLcClFHll000215cc hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Nov 2001 17:20:37.0127 (UTC) FILETIME=[82944170:01C16C67]
Resent-Message-ID: <"j0haS2.0.IL5.5QLyx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45267
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

Having visited Muller in Canada, only to find he had not been honest about 
having instruments we could have brought with us to measure his gain, and 
being friends with others who have evaluated his machines over the years, I 
would estimate his liklihood of putting a real over-unity device into 
production as zero.  He is a very difficult individual and insults anyone 
who questions him.  Good luck, Ryan!

Mark Goldes, CEO
Magnetic Power Inc.


>From: "Ryan Hopkins" <thebishop usadatanet.net>
>Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
>To: <vortex-l eskimo.com>
>Subject: Re: A little help
>Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 17:43:14 -0500
>
>John Schnurer said;
><<Can you help to show some main stream through off-the-beaten-track
>methods of energy conversion or sources.>>
>
>www.theverylastpageoftheinternet.com
>see the Muller motor/generator section.  This guy's design apparently
>outputs 300amps   100% duty cycle with pulsed input of about 36amps.  It
>uses amorphous steel in the cores of the pick-up coils, which leads to near
>zero magnetic drag, and high strength NdFeB magnets, which leads to
>high-speed and high amperage.
>I'm in the process of replicating the Muller generator on a smaller scale.
>
>It's not exactly mainstream, but it's a proven design and the money you put
>into it will be returned.  Say you have a house - electyricity is 
>expensive!
>But if you make your own and phase-match it to the main line, the power
>company (thanks to deregulation) is required by law to buy back the energy
>you don't use.  This is the epitome of the term 'energizer bunny.'
>
>cheers =)
>
>Ryan Hopkins
>


_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Tue Nov 13 09:30:52 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id JAA27178;
	Tue, 13 Nov 2001 09:30:15 -0800
Resent-Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 09:30:15 -0800
Message-ID: <002701c16c68$d5b82be0$421ed140 usadatanet.net>
From: "Ryan Hopkins" <thebishop usadatanet.net>
To: <vortex-l eskimo.com>
References: <F5N1aJPIGrYLcClFHll000215cc hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Muller's work
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 12:30:00 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
Resent-Message-ID: <"bMBET.0.Oe6.cYLyx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45268
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

That stinks.  He has not returned either of my emails.  However, I have been
in touch with Doug Konzen (konehead msn.com) who has mated a simplified
version of the muller generator to his OU pulse motor set-up.  Reports from
his side of things are encouraging.
Ryan

----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Goldes" <mgoldes msn.com>
To: <vortex-l eskimo.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 12:20 PM
Subject: Re: Muller's work


> Having visited Muller in Canada, only to find he had not been honest about
> having instruments we could have brought with us to measure his gain, and
> being friends with others who have evaluated his machines over the years,
I
> would estimate his liklihood of putting a real over-unity device into
> production as zero.  He is a very difficult individual and insults anyone
> who questions him.  Good luck, Ryan!
>
> Mark Goldes, CEO
> Magnetic Power Inc.
>
>
> >From: "Ryan Hopkins" <thebishop usadatanet.net>
> >Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
> >To: <vortex-l eskimo.com>
> >Subject: Re: A little help
> >Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 17:43:14 -0500
> >
> >John Schnurer said;
> ><<Can you help to show some main stream through off-the-beaten-track
> >methods of energy conversion or sources.>>
> >
> >www.theverylastpageoftheinternet.com
> >see the Muller motor/generator section.  This guy's design apparently
> >outputs 300amps   100% duty cycle with pulsed input of about 36amps.  It
> >uses amorphous steel in the cores of the pick-up coils, which leads to
near
> >zero magnetic drag, and high strength NdFeB magnets, which leads to
> >high-speed and high amperage.
> >I'm in the process of replicating the Muller generator on a smaller
scale.
> >
> >It's not exactly mainstream, but it's a proven design and the money you
put
> >into it will be returned.  Say you have a house - electyricity is
> >expensive!
> >But if you make your own and phase-match it to the main line, the power
> >company (thanks to deregulation) is required by law to buy back the
energy
> >you don't use.  This is the epitome of the term 'energizer bunny.'
> >
> >cheers =)
> >
> >Ryan Hopkins
> >
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
>

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Tue Nov 13 10:18:10 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id KAA19293;
	Tue, 13 Nov 2001 10:15:21 -0800
Resent-Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 10:15:21 -0800
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20011113125420.0341c1c0 pop.mindspring.com>
X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 13:15:21 -0500
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
From: Jed Rothwell <jedrothwell infinite-energy.com>
Subject: Re: A little help
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1011112173441.1542K-100000 college.antioch-c
 ollege.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Resent-Message-ID: <"UO0U43.0.Gj4.tCMyx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45269
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

John Schnurer wrote:


>         I have been trying to query the community about non coal, oil and
>nuclear fuel.
>
>         Some of the feedback is ...in my opinion ... a little defeatist.

Some is uninformed, some is biased, and some does not take into account the 
fact that new technology is usually inefficient and at a large disadvantage 
compared to established technology.


>         See some of the "answers" of "can't be done" community;
>
>In short, we have discovered that solar PV (conventional) has an emergy 
>of  0.41 according to H. T. Odum, which means it actually delivers in 
>its  lifetime 41% of the total energy consumed by its manufacture, 
>maintenance and disposal. Even if you could double the efficiency by using 
>DEC, you would still not break even.

I am afraid this is probably true. Solar photovoltaic (PV) cells take 2 to 
6 years to recover the energy deficit, and in the field many of them do not 
last that long. In other words, a PV generation system consumes more energy 
than it produces. It is useful as a battery, moving energy from the factory 
to inaccessible locations or hand calculators. See:

http://www.siemenssolar.com/Paybackstudy.pdf

This is mitigated by the fact that most of the "embodied" energy in a PV is 
in silicon, which is usually waste silicon from semiconductor 
manufacturing. If it were not used in PVs, it would be thrown away, and the 
energy lost. However, there is not enough waste silicon to manufacture PVs 
in large enough numbers to have a significant impact on the total national 
energy demand. As things stand, lighting your house with a PV array is a 
little like heating it by burning with the waste cardboard from a 
semiconductor factory.

Other alternative energy systems have a much shorter embodied energy pay 
back time. Wind turbines require energy to manufacture, construct and 
maintain. This "energy debt" is recovered in three months of operation. 
Fossil fuel plants recover the debt in one month of operation, including 
the energy required to mine and ship the fuel. I am not sure about fission 
plants.


>         "...... there is insufficient time and remaining energy now to
>change the trillions of dollars of infrastructure enough to prevent a
>massive dieoff of billions of people as the energy decline strangles
>agriculture and the economy generally. ....."

The infrastructure wears out and has to replaced anyway, every 30 to 50 
years. Large parts of the distribution network in places like Florida and 
Georgia is sometimes destroyed by storms. If cold fusion can be 
implemented, it will not be worth maintaining the infrastructure, and 
within a generation most of it will be sold for scrap or abandoned in place.

I do not think there will be a massive "dieoff" of billions of people in 
the developed world, which has an infrastructure and modern energy 
generation. People know how to take care of themselves, and they react to 
threats. That is why the Y2K bug did not destroy our computer 
infrastructure. It would have, if we had not spent a ton of money fixing 
the problem. A massive dieoff of billions of people is already underway in 
the third world. Actually, it has always has been underway, for all of 
recorded history. The disaster is that things have not changed, and 
problems that should have been fixed a hundred years ago are still 
festering. Roughly 50,000 people per week die from easily prevented causes, 
mainly lack of energy, and also water bourne disease, malaria and so on -- 
plus war, which may be the worst scourge.

- Jed

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Tue Nov 13 12:26:29 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id MAA23704;
	Tue, 13 Nov 2001 12:23:00 -0800
Resent-Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 12:23:00 -0800
Message-ID: <3BF180F1.381E58F ix.netcom.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 12:22:09 -0800
From: Akira Kawasaki <aki ix.netcom.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en]C-CCK-MCD NSCPCD472  (Win95; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Vortex <vortex-l eskimo.com>
Subject: Mallove heard: Good interview
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Resent-Message-ID: <"xCIyH2.0.Ho5.Z4Oyx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45270
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

Nov. 12, 2001

So I was ready to snooze when my wife reminded me of my remarking about
another Art Bell interview with Mallove. I had mentioned it earlier in
the day. Eh!, I thought. Another session of commercials interlaced with
an interview about cf. Who needs the rehash of the subject reduced to
the Pablum level? However, I did listen in spurts, turning off the radio
when the commercials started then back on about fifteen minutes later.
The interview was conducted by a George 'Nohri' standing in for Art Bell
who continues to have back problems (methinks he is taking too much HGH)
--- all five hours. The interview turned out better than past ones.
'Gene was more relaxed and  informative despite the speech impediment of
frequently interspersing  'okey?' at the oddest moments. : ) He did call
the secure MIT scientists and others of their ilk a bunch of S.O.B.'s
(with Nohri egging him on).
The topics covered were a range of "cold fusion" phenomena from the Pons
& Fleischmann effect, arcing, sonofusion, Corea's experiments, Black
Light, Case, SRI, Mitchell Swartz, to otrhers such as the Big Bang, the
Aether, UFO's, Relativity, God, and more. A nice intermixture of a
sampler variety melange to tickle and  keep a sleepy mind awake. There
were the promotion of the 'Fire From Water' video, the Infinite Energy
Magazine and  I.E. website. And the call-ins were a little more better
than past interviews.

-AK-.


From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Tue Nov 13 14:32:43 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id OAA30924;
	Tue, 13 Nov 2001 14:29:17 -0800
Resent-Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 14:29:17 -0800
X-Apparently-From: <cjford1 yahoo.com>
Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.20011113140638.009572d0 pop.mail.yahoo.com>
X-Sender: cjford1 pop.mail.yahoo.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58 
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 16:29:18 -0600
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
From: Charles Ford <cjford1 yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: A little help
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20011113125420.0341c1c0 pop.mindspring.com>
References: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1011112173441.1542K-100000 college.antioch-c ollege.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Resent-Message-ID: <"HmVKv2.0.5Z7.ywPyx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45271
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

At 01:15 PM 11/13/01 -0500, you wrote:
>John Schnurer wrote:
>
>
>>         I have been trying to query the community about non coal, oil and
>>nuclear fuel.
>>
>>         Some of the feedback is ...in my opinion ... a little defeatist.
>
>Some is uninformed, some is biased, and some does not take into account 
>the fact that new technology is usually inefficient and at a large 
>disadvantage compared to established technology.
>
>
>>         See some of the "answers" of "can't be done" community;
>>
>>In short, we have discovered that solar PV (conventional) has an emergy 
>>of  0.41 according to H. T. Odum, which means it actually delivers in 
>>its  lifetime 41% of the total energy consumed by its manufacture, 
>>maintenance and disposal. Even if you could double the efficiency by 
>>using DEC, you would still not break even.

But has anybody done a time failure analysis?

Here is an interesting thought.  Filed applications of Silicon PVs are 
always done in multi cell panels.  Each cell folds over at about .7V  so it 
takes about 20 of them to maintain a 12V led-acid battery.   IF one cell 
fails the whole panel fails.  This skews the stats a bit.  The individual 
chips are rather brittle. so environment issues can cause failure via 
cracking or freezing or any number of evil things that this planet does to 
our equipment...  When one cell fails there are 19 good cells still in the 
panel.

If you can show me enough silicon solar equipment failing that I can 
justify a service / recycling center I can get it set up.    There is a 
nationwide service here in Fort Worth that would be more then willing to 
open another division.




Charlie Ford

KC5-OWZ
cjford1 yahoo.com
cjford1 swbell.net

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free  yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Tue Nov 13 14:43:30 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id OAA04651;
	Tue, 13 Nov 2001 14:42:03 -0800
Resent-Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 14:42:03 -0800
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20011113173100.03446680 pop.mindspring.com>
X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 17:41:54 -0500
To: vortex-L eskimo.com
From: Jed Rothwell <jedrothwell infinite-energy.com>
Subject: OFF TOPIC birds endanger airplanes, and vice versa
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Resent-Message-ID: <"t7eUM1.0.981.t6Qyx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45272
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: RO
X-Status: 

See:

http://slate.msn.com/default.aspx?id=2058630

This is common knowledge to aviation buffs. Bird strikes have caused fatal 
crashes, usually on takeoff. They may have been a factor yesterday.

I bring this up because it is a good example of fragile technology. A 
gigantic machine worth hundreds of millions, with people's lives and 
hundreds of millions more in liability at stake, can sometimes be struck by 
a catastrophe from some mundane cause, which cannot be prevented. The Three 
Mile Island accident was an example that could have been prevented, but I 
do not see how we can eliminate the danger of bird strikes.

As I have often pointed out, most casualties in air crashes are caused by 
burning fuel, and cold fusion would fix that problem. I suppose it would 
still call for large amounts of superheated water or some other fluid, and 
any high performance engine strong enough and light enough for an airplane 
may shred itself and fly to pieces. (Whereas a Diesel railroad or marine 
engine would never do that.)

It is a little difficult to imagine how a CF heat engine could drive an 
airplane, but someone will invent a method. It will have many advantages in 
safety, range, economy, pollution and so on.

- Jed

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Tue Nov 13 15:02:16 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id OAA13715;
	Tue, 13 Nov 2001 14:59:27 -0800
Resent-Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 14:59:27 -0800
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20011113174250.0341c1c0 pop.mindspring.com>
X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 17:59:20 -0500
To: vortex-l eskimo.com, vortex-l@eskimo.com
From: Jed Rothwell <jedrothwell infinite-energy.com>
Subject: Re: A little help
In-Reply-To: <4.2.0.58.20011113140638.009572d0 pop.mail.yahoo.com>
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20011113125420.0341c1c0 pop.mindspring.com>
 <Pine.GSO.3.96.1011112173441.1542K-100000 college.antioch-c ollege.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Resent-Message-ID: <"9OZia3.0.BM3.ENQyx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45273
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

Charles Ford wrote:

>>>delivers in its  lifetime 41% of the total energy consumed by its 
>>>manufacture, maintenance and disposal. Even if you could double the 
>>>efficiency by using DEC, you would still not break even.
>
>But has anybody done a time failure analysis?

Yes, there has been extensive research on this, by private industry and the 
DoE. A rather cynical DoE report says MTTF is not as good as industry claims:

M. Thomas, H. Post, "Photovoltaic Systems Performance and Reliability: 
Myths, Facts, and Concerns. A 1996 Perspective," Photovoltaics Quarterly, 
(Sandia National Laboratory), http://www.sandia.gov/pv/hot/Pvq_496.htm


>Here is an interesting thought.  Filed applications of Silicon PVs are 
>always done in multi cell panels.  Each cell folds over at about .7V  so 
>it takes about 20 of them to maintain a 12V led-acid battery.   IF one 
>cell fails the whole panel fails.  This skews the stats a bit.  The 
>individual chips are rather brittle. so environment issues can cause 
>failure via cracking or freezing or any number of evil things that this 
>planet does to our equipment...  When one cell fails there are 19 good 
>cells still in the panel.

As far as I know, individual chips seldom fail ahead of schedule -- that 
is, sooner than others placed in the same environment. Also, complete 
failure is not the problem. The problem is gradual and continual 
degradation. It costs money to maintain an array, for such things as 
cleaning off the surface. When an array produces only half the electricity 
it once did, it may no longer be cost effective to maintain it. This may 
happen only ten years after installation, in some environments. Other 
generators degrade over time too, especially geothermal generators. Wind 
turbines are designed to last 10 or 20 years. With most others sources such 
as wind turbines, coal generators, or automobile engines, the decline is 
less steep than PVs, and useful service continues until a major overhaul or 
a change in regulations makes continued maintenance uneconomical. The whole 
system is then scrapped. I doubt that productivity has typically fallen by 
half when the system is scrapped.

Automobile batteries seem to fall off rather drastically and continuously 
in performance, in my personal experience. This may be a problem with 
electric cars.


>If you can show me enough silicon solar equipment failing that I can 
>justify a service / recycling center I can get it set up.

I think it unlikely that silicon would be worth recycling. The raw material 
is sand -- very cheap.

- Jed

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Tue Nov 13 15:16:32 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id PAA21980;
	Tue, 13 Nov 2001 15:15:26 -0800
Resent-Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 15:15:26 -0800
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 16:34:52 -0800 (PST)
From: hank scudder <hjscudde newton.csun.edu>
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Re: A little help
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20011113174250.0341c1c0 pop.mindspring.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0111131629160.12205-100000 newton.csun.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Resent-Message-ID: <"05t9R.0.FN5.DcQyx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45274
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

I just replaced a solar panel, a 5 watt Kyocera model, that lasted 15
years. The plexiglass cover crazed and leaked water, which corroded the
innards, and it stopped working. It might be capable of working again, if
the cover could be replaced, but it is glued onto the solar
disks(chips?). It cost me $100 used in 1990 at a used boating equipment
shop in Fort Pierce, FL, and has resided on my travel trailer in recent
years, keeping the batteries charged near full. (lots of sunshine here in
LA).

Hank


On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Jed Rothwell wrote:

> Charles Ford wrote:
> 
> >>>delivers in its  lifetime 41% of the total energy consumed by its 
> >>>manufacture, maintenance and disposal. Even if you could double the 
> >>>efficiency by using DEC, you would still not break even.
> >
> >But has anybody done a time failure analysis?
> 
> Yes, there has been extensive research on this, by private industry and the 
> DoE. A rather cynical DoE report says MTTF is not as good as industry claims:
> 
> M. Thomas, H. Post, "Photovoltaic Systems Performance and Reliability: 
> Myths, Facts, and Concerns. A 1996 Perspective," Photovoltaics Quarterly, 
> (Sandia National Laboratory), http://www.sandia.gov/pv/hot/Pvq_496.htm
> 
> 
> >Here is an interesting thought.  Filed applications of Silicon PVs are 
> >always done in multi cell panels.  Each cell folds over at about .7V  so 
> >it takes about 20 of them to maintain a 12V led-acid battery.   IF one 
> >cell fails the whole panel fails.  This skews the stats a bit.  The 
> >individual chips are rather brittle. so environment issues can cause 
> >failure via cracking or freezing or any number of evil things that this 
> >planet does to our equipment...  When one cell fails there are 19 good 
> >cells still in the panel.
> 
> As far as I know, individual chips seldom fail ahead of schedule -- that 
> is, sooner than others placed in the same environment. Also, complete 
> failure is not the problem. The problem is gradual and continual 
> degradation. It costs money to maintain an array, for such things as 
> cleaning off the surface. When an array produces only half the electricity 
> it once did, it may no longer be cost effective to maintain it. This may 
> happen only ten years after installation, in some environments. Other 
> generators degrade over time too, especially geothermal generators. Wind 
> turbines are designed to last 10 or 20 years. With most others sources such 
> as wind turbines, coal generators, or automobile engines, the decline is 
> less steep than PVs, and useful service continues until a major overhaul or 
> a change in regulations makes continued maintenance uneconomical. The whole 
> system is then scrapped. I doubt that productivity has typically fallen by 
> half when the system is scrapped.
> 
> Automobile batteries seem to fall off rather drastically and continuously 
> in performance, in my personal experience. This may be a problem with 
> electric cars.
> 
> 
> >If you can show me enough silicon solar equipment failing that I can 
> >justify a service / recycling center I can get it set up.
> 
> I think it unlikely that silicon would be worth recycling. The raw material 
> is sand -- very cheap.
> 
> - Jed
> 

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Tue Nov 13 15:41:17 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id PAA02037;
	Tue, 13 Nov 2001 15:34:31 -0800
Resent-Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 15:34:31 -0800
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20011113182945.0341c1c0 pop.mindspring.com>
X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 18:34:32 -0500
To: vortex-l eskimo.com, vortex-l@eskimo.com
From: Jed Rothwell <jedrothwell infinite-energy.com>
Subject: Re: A little help
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0111131629160.12205-100000 newton.csun.edu>
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20011113174250.0341c1c0 pop.mindspring.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Resent-Message-ID: <"N90Jn2.0.lV.6uQyx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45275
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

hank scudder wrote:

>I just replaced a solar panel, a 5 watt Kyocera model, that lasted 15 
>years. The plexiglass cover crazed and leaked water, which corroded the 
>innards, and it stopped working.

That is an example of a final, catastrophic failure. But did you get a 
chance to measure performance during the lifetime of the panel? Did you 
observe it gradually degrade? Thomas & Post make interesting comments about 
infant mortality, degradation, catastrophic failure and other 
ghoulish-sounding technical problems in the PVs, batteries, inverters and 
other peripheral equipment.  All in all, they make PV electricity sound 
unpromising.

- Jed

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Tue Nov 13 16:12:18 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id QAA19901;
	Tue, 13 Nov 2001 16:09:12 -0800
Resent-Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 16:09:12 -0800
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 17:28:35 -0800 (PST)
From: hank scudder <hjscudde newton.csun.edu>
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Re: A little help
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20011113182945.0341c1c0 pop.mindspring.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0111131723490.12205-100000 newton.csun.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Resent-Message-ID: <"OZP5M1.0.is4.dORyx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45276
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

I did not try and observe its behavior, other then seeing if it kept the
battery charged. This summer, when I went on vacation, I had to buy new
batteries because the solar panel had died. I hadn't used it in two years
before, and didn't check the batteries for 6 months, having complete faith
in the solar panel. So much for testing and reliability. It worked OK for
8 years for me, at least, and was worth the $100.

Hank

On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Jed Rothwell wrote:

> hank scudder wrote:
> 
> >I just replaced a solar panel, a 5 watt Kyocera model, that lasted 15 
> >years. The plexiglass cover crazed and leaked water, which corroded the 
> >innards, and it stopped working.
> 
> That is an example of a final, catastrophic failure. But did you get a 
> chance to measure performance during the lifetime of the panel? Did you 
> observe it gradually degrade? Thomas & Post make interesting comments about 
> infant mortality, degradation, catastrophic failure and other 
> ghoulish-sounding technical problems in the PVs, batteries, inverters and 
> other peripheral equipment.  All in all, they make PV electricity sound 
> unpromising.
> 
> - Jed
> 

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Tue Nov 13 18:32:10 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id SAA29231;
	Tue, 13 Nov 2001 18:29:34 -0800
Resent-Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 18:29:34 -0800
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Standing Bear <rockcast net-link.net>
To: vortex-l eskimo.com, Charles Ford <cjford1@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: A little help
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 21:31:34 -0500
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2]
References: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1011112173441.1542K-100000 college.antioch-c ollege.edu> <4.2.0.58.20011113140638.009572d0@pop.mail.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <4.2.0.58.20011113140638.009572d0 pop.mail.yahoo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <01111321313400.00719 linux>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id SAA29202
Resent-Message-ID: <"lghah.0.c87.ESTyx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45277
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

On Tuesday 13 November 2001 17:29, Charles Ford wrote:
> At 01:15 PM 11/13/01 -0500, you wrote:
> >John Schnurer wrote:
> >>         I have been trying to query the community about non coal, oil
> >> and nuclear fuel.
> >>
> >>         Some of the feedback is ...in my opinion ... a little defeatist.
> >
> >Some is uninformed, some is biased, and some does not take into account
> >the fact that new technology is usually inefficient and at a large
> >disadvantage compared to established technology.
> >
> >>         See some of the "answers" of "can't be done" community;
> >>
> >>In short, we have discovered that solar PV (conventional) has an emergy
> >>of  0.41 according to H. T. Odum, which means it actually delivers in
> >>its  lifetime 41% of the total energy consumed by its manufacture,
> >>maintenance and disposal. Even if you could double the efficiency by
> >>using DEC, you would still not break even.
>
> But has anybody done a time failure analysis?
>
> Here is an interesting thought.  Filed applications of Silicon PVs are
> always done in multi cell panels.  Each cell folds over at about .7V  so it
> takes about 20 of them to maintain a 12V led-acid battery.   IF one cell
> fails the whole panel fails.  This skews the stats a bit.  The individual
> chips are rather brittle. so environment issues can cause failure via
> cracking or freezing or any number of evil things that this planet does to
> our equipment...  When one cell fails there are 19 good cells still in the
> panel.
>
> If you can show me enough silicon solar equipment failing that I can
> justify a service / recycling center I can get it set up.    There is a
> nationwide service here in Fort Worth that would be more then willing to
> open another division.
>
>
>
>
> Charlie Ford
>
> KC5-OWZ
> cjford1 yahoo.com
> cjford1 swbell.net
>
>Charlie,
	Part of the problem may just be our throw-away society.
We throw away anything and everything, even people.  Look at
what business does with every employee over the age of 40.  One
reason that we do that is our insurance dominated health care
system.  But that is beside the point.
	You, and many others remember when American products
were made to be maintainable.  I remember my mother's mixer.  It
was a Sunbeam and sat on a stand.  It was too heavy for my four
years old body to carry across the kitchen!  It lasted forever, and
when a brush did give out, it had convenient brush access screw
plugs on the side to replace them.  It had small holes for lubrication
of the bearings......which were also replaceable.  It shipped with
a detailed manual complete with electrical diagrams and a parts
list showing prices, availablility and where one could mail or call
the manufacturer.  Along with this was a certified dealer list where
the item could be taken for repair or parts purchase.  Dealers were
certified on the basis of continued and supervised performance of
the manufacturers' guarantee provisions.  Yes!  Real guarantees,
not customer data mining masquerading as 'limited warrantees' or
'registration'. 
	We have lost that product.  The new 'improved' replacement
is small and light and made of plastic;  even the beater sockets.
It has no real torque, and if it were to be used to mix a viscous dough
like cookies, its motor would cook before the cookies ever got started!
If anything happens to it, the manufacturers cannot be found and the
selling stores run away from it, hiding behind 'limited warranties' that
disclaim even the basic English Common Law implied 'warrantee of
merchantability or fitness.
	Now look at Chinese products and some Korean products.
You will find here what we were 70 years ago.  Quality!  Even the
lowest toy is put together with screws.  Many screws!  Yes! Even
the toys are maintainable.  The Chinese have a reverence for science
and the future that is to be commended.  Maybe they know that it
is their only hope for future survival?;  I do not know.  
	Getting back to your photo-voltaic panel.  It has been
described in such manner as to have been unmaintainable by the
typical user as manufactured, and that the failure of a small part
would render the whole as a discard to a dust bin.  Maybe this is
why photo voltaics are getting unfairly attacked (recent letters).
First, someone manufactures a convenient unit foregoing maintainability
in favor of false economy.  The unit is therefore not cost effective
and the manufacturer knows this and does not tell the customer,
rather prefering to further fraudulent sales campaigns in order to
maximize profits in the short run.  This he does.  Customers eventually
sour on the the product, and finding no other products in the 
marketplace with any quality ( the bad having driven out the good)
retreats from utilizing the technology.  Eventually some opportunist
speciousely criticizes the technology as not being viable while 
ignoring the abuse it has taken to arrive at that sorry state.
	Like you said, if maintainable units could be manufactured
and sold in competition with these units, and survive predatory
efforts by large market players to squeeze it off the shelves and 
out of the stores or otherwise marginalize it;  then maybe, just maybe,
the economic equation balance would tip in its favor.

Standing Bear
rockcast net-link.net

just got back on line after long hard computer rebuild

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Tue Nov 13 19:49:12 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id TAA31894;
	Tue, 13 Nov 2001 19:45:27 -0800
Resent-Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 19:45:27 -0800
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 22:53:01 -0500 (EST)
From: John Schnurer <herman antioch-college.edu>
To: hank scudder <hjscudde newton.csun.edu>
cc: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: And they......Re: A little help
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0111131723490.12205-100000 newton.csun.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1011113223431.14590C-100000 college.antioch-college.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Resent-Message-ID: <"Dk0ic3.0.Bo7.NZUyx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45278
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 



	Here are some URL for not really well known DEC from DOE.


	And.... just for a stimulus for those who want to do some digging
on their own.

	I believe the DEC of optical to hydrogen is at 50 to 65 percents
quantum efficient ....This is using sunlight to hydrogen
photoelectrocatalytic ....
	What does that figure out to if you use the H and O to operate a
fuel cell?

	What does a square yard (or meter) give us in electrical power?


	These examples, below, are nowhere NEAR the top...


	AND.... you even have to dig inside their papers to find stuff
such as one mention of 18 percents.


Photoelectrode Design for CIS Photoelectrode Design for CIS
The new photoelectrode design allows use of side-by-side series-connected
single-junction solar
cells in addition to the stacked multijunction configuration. This has
opened the door to using
alternative low cost, high-efficiency thin film materials, such as
copper-indium-diselenide, which
have reported solar efficiencies exceeding 18%. These materials were not
previously considered
because of the low voltage of a single junction device and the inability
to fabricate monolithic-stacked
multi-junctions. However, the newly proposed encapsulated photoelectrode
design was
further developed to incorporate side-by-side CIGS cells, taking advantage
of the potential for
efficiency enhancement.


	This is so goofy ... they did not want to try using it becasue one
cell put out less voltage than they wanted....

	What the heck do they do with a car battery....??!!  

	They stack up 6 cells to get the 12 volts....

	It is as though papers are writtne to show why the investigators
CANNOT succeed....

	Puhleeze wake UP!


http://www.eren.doe.gov/hydrogen/pdfs/28890s.pdf
http://www.nrel.gov/ncpv/pdfs/phtochem.pdf
http://www.ise.fhg.de/Events/2ndworld.html


PHOTOELECTROCHEMICAL HYDROGEN PRODUCTION PHOTOELECTROCHEMICAL HYDROGEN
PRODUCTION
Eric Miller and Richard Rocheleau Eric Miller and Richard Rocheleau
Hawaii Natural Energy Institute Hawaii Natural Energy Institute
School of Ocean and Earth Science and Technology School of Ocean and Earth
Science and Technology
University of Hawaii at Manoa University of Hawaii at Manoa
Honolulu, HI 96822, USA Honolulu, HI 96822, USA
Abstract Abstract
High efficiency photoelectrochemical (PEC) systems to produce hydrogen
directly from water using
sunlight as the energy source have been identified by DOE as one of the
promising technologies to
meet long-term hydrogen-production goals. In the PEC research at UH, our
approach has been to
compare alternate materials and system configurations using reactor
modeling, and to identify and
address the critical materials and photoelectrode-operation issues through
extensive experiments in
materials synthesis and in photoelectrode fabrication and testing. In 1996
we demonstrated direct
solar-to-hydrogen conversion efficiencies of 7.8% using a photocathode
fabricated from 10%
efficient triple-junction amorphous silicon solar cells. These prototypes
were configured with a
separate anode connect by wire to a photocathode. In subsequent years, our
focus shifted toward the
development of photoelectrodes with fully integrated cathodes/anodes. This
year, we advanced the
design of a new fully integrated and self-contained photoelectrode
fabricated entirely with thin film
processing and demonstrated a process sequence to fabricate prototypes.
The new photoelectrodes
again used multi-junction a-Si cells and sputter-deposited catalyst,
contact, and protective films
developed at UH. We also continued the development of optimal
transparent-conductive and
protective films. A deposition system for copper-indium -gallium
diselenide (CIGS) films was
installed (cost shared with other projects and UH support) as part of a
new effort to develop higher
efficiency photoelectrodes. The encapsulated design with side-by-side
series-connected CIGS
junctions has the potential to achieve 15% solar to hydrogen conversion
efficiency. Plans are
underway to demonstrate hydrogen-production using the a-Si photoelectrodes
and to develop a
fabrication process for high efficiency CIGS-based photoelectrodes.


PHOTOCHEMICAL SOLAR CELLS BASED ON DYE-SENSITIZATION OF NANOCRYSTALLINE
TIO2
S. K. Deb, R. Ellingson, S. Ferrere, A. J. Frank, B. A. Gregg, A. J.
Nozik, N. Park, and G. Schlichthrl
National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), 1617 Cole Boulevard, Golden,
CO 80401-3393 USA
ABSTRACT: A photoelectrochemical solar cell that is based on the
dye-sensitization of thin nanocrystalline films of TiO2 (anatase)
nanoparticles in contact with a non-aqueous liquid electrolyte is
described. The cell, fabricated at NREL, shows a conversion
efficiency of -9.2% at AM1.5, which approaches the best reported value of
10%-11% by Grtzel at EPFL in Lausanne,
Switzerland. The femtosecond (fs) pump-probe spectroscopy has been used to
time resolve the injection of electrons into the
conduction band of nanocrystalline TiO2 films under ambient conditions
following photoexcitation of the adsorbed Ru(11)-complex
dye. The measurement indicates an instrument-limited -50 fs upper limit on
the electron injection time. We also report the
sensitization of nanocrystalline TiO2 by a novel iron-based dye, CIS-[Fe
11 (2,2'-bipyridine-4,4'-dicarboxylic acid)2 (CN)2 ], a
chromophore with an extremely short-lived, nonemissive excited state. The
dye also exhibits a unique "band selective" sensitization
through one of its two absorption bands. The operational principle of the
device has been studied through the measurement of
electric field distribution within the device structure and studies on the
pH dependence of dye-redox potential. The incorporation
of WO3 -based electrochromic layer into this device has led to a novel
photoelectrochromic device structure for "smart window"
application.
Keywords: Dye-sensitized photoelectrochemical solar cel -1:
Photoelectrochromic window-2


On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, hank scudder wrote:

> I did not try and observe its behavior, other then seeing if it kept the
> battery charged. This summer, when I went on vacation, I had to buy new
> batteries because the solar panel had died. I hadn't used it in two years
> before, and didn't check the batteries for 6 months, having complete faith
> in the solar panel. So much for testing and reliability. It worked OK for
> 8 years for me, at least, and was worth the $100.
> 
> Hank
> 
> On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> 
> > hank scudder wrote:
> > 
> > >I just replaced a solar panel, a 5 watt Kyocera model, that lasted 15 
> > >years. The plexiglass cover crazed and leaked water, which corroded the 
> > >innards, and it stopped working.
> > 
> > That is an example of a final, catastrophic failure. But did you get a 
> > chance to measure performance during the lifetime of the panel? Did you 
> > observe it gradually degrade? Thomas & Post make interesting comments about 
> > infant mortality, degradation, catastrophic failure and other 
> > ghoulish-sounding technical problems in the PVs, batteries, inverters and 
> > other peripheral equipment.  All in all, they make PV electricity sound 
> > unpromising.
> > 
> > - Jed
> > 
> 

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Tue Nov 13 22:17:01 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id WAA26956;
	Tue, 13 Nov 2001 22:14:20 -0800
Resent-Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 22:14:20 -0800
From: dtmiller midiowa.net (Dean T. Miller)
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Re: Gene Mallove on Art Bell show - Evening 11/12-13/01
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 05:13:31 GMT
Organization: Miller and Associates
Message-ID: <3bf5fd35.97578787 mail.midiowa.net>
References: <200111122122.QAA18798 mercury.mv.net> <003501c16bc2$0b1fb7a0$6401a8c0@cs910664a> <3BF0446C.655D57AD@bellsouth.net> <3bf1a7d5.10173635@mail.midiowa.net> <20011113103310.B16812@tao.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20011113103310.B16812 tao.org.uk>
X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.5/32.452
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id WAA26829
Resent-Message-ID: <"ynLoJ1.0.6b6.ykWyx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45279
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

Hi Joe,

On Tue, 13 Nov 2001 10:33:10 +0000, Josef Karthauser <joe tao.org.uk>
wrote:

>On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 04:56:22AM +0000, Dean T. Miller wrote:
>> Also, some of the stations carrying the show put it onto the 'net --
>> FOR FREE!
>
>Please tell me which ones.  I over slept and didn't manage to get up at
>6am as I'd planned to listen to it over the net. Now I'll need to listen
>to it on archive somewhere.  Any pointers would be very greatly
>received.

I'm not aware of any archive for Coast-to-Coast except on Bell's site.
The stations that web-cast the show (and all of the shows on the
station) are always live.

-- Dean -- from (almost) Des Moines -- KB0ZDF

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Wed Nov 14 09:53:46 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id JAA24967;
	Wed, 14 Nov 2001 09:50:28 -0800
Resent-Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 09:50:28 -0800
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20011114122703.00ab3ba0 pop.mindspring.com>
X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 12:50:24 -0500
To: vortex-l eskimo.com, vortex-l@eskimo.com, Charles Ford <cjford1@yahoo.com>
From: Jed Rothwell <jedrothwell infinite-energy.com>
Subject: Re: A little help
In-Reply-To: <01111321313400.00719 linux>
References: <4.2.0.58.20011113140638.009572d0 pop.mail.yahoo.com>
 <Pine.GSO.3.96.1011112173441.1542K-100000 college.antioch-c ollege.edu>
 <4.2.0.58.20011113140638.009572d0 pop.mail.yahoo.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Resent-Message-ID: <"YTj7b1.0.166.axgyx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45280
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

Standing Bear wrote:

>         Part of the problem may just be our throw-away society.
>We throw away anything and everything, even people. . . .

As far as I know, most major U.S. durable goods last longer today than they 
did 50 years ago, including such things as automobiles, refrigerators, 
radios, power tools and roofing material. Product warranties and safety are 
greatly improved, thanks to competition and pressure from consumer 
organizations and regulators.


>         You, and many others remember when American products
>were made to be maintainable.  I remember my mother's mixer.  It
>was a Sunbeam and sat on a stand.  It was too heavy for my four
>years old body to carry across the kitchen!  It lasted forever, and
>when a brush did give out . . .

You can still buy a mixer of this type. Professional, or restaurant grade 
equipment has heavy duty replaceable parts, full schematics and so on. In 
the 1950s, for some products, only restaurant grade equipment was 
available; there were no cheap substitutes. Relative to inflation, the 
heavy duty model of 1950 probably cost as much or more as the restaurant 
grade machine does today, and today's light plastic model costs roughly as 
much as a 1950 hand driven eggbeater.


>It shipped with a detailed manual complete with electrical diagrams and a 
>parts list showing prices, availablility and where one could mail or call
>the manufacturer.

This kind of information is more readily available today, thanks to 
government regulations and the Internet.


>         Now look at Chinese products and some Korean products.
>You will find here what we were 70 years ago.  Quality!

On the contrary, I have found most Chinese models very shoddy. U.S. 
products are often so good they have priced themselves out of the market.



>Even the lowest toy is put together with screws.  Many screws!  Yes! Even 
>the toys are maintainable.  The Chinese have a reverence for science and 
>the future that is to be commended.

I admire Chinese civilization as much as anyone, but their manufacturers 
and political leaders are not know for having a reverence for science, the 
future, or anything else. They are rapacious, corrupt and money grubbing, 
unrestrained by traditions or legal restrictions. I have not seen screws in 
many Chinese goods. For that kind of "quality" look at Japanese products. 
Actually, that is probably a sign of obsolescence rather than quality. 
Screws work loose and fall out. Other fasteners are more reliable, although 
some cannot be opened.

Many products, such as bearings on automobiles, had to be maintained in the 
1950s, but today they are in a sealed, inaccessible module. They cannot be 
maintained. Once they wear out, they can only be replaced. This is not a 
sign of laziness, or decreased quality, and it is not a waste of resources. 
Sealed bearings last longer. They can be fabricated with greater precision 
so they produce less friction and thus save energy. They are less likely to 
catch on fire than the old-fashioned ones. It takes less labor to replace 
them, so automobile mechanics can be more productive and earn a decent 
living. Our society puts more value on human labor -- people's time -- than 
materials. That's a good thing. If scrap material increases significantly 
because of that decision, and waste becomes a problem, it should be recycled.

- Jed

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Wed Nov 14 10:33:08 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id KAA10233;
	Wed, 14 Nov 2001 10:29:39 -0800
Resent-Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 10:29:39 -0800
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 11:48:43 -0800 (PST)
From: hank scudder <hjscudde newton.csun.edu>
To: John Schnurer <herman antioch-college.edu>
cc: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Re: And they......Re: A little help
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1011113223431.14590C-100000 college.antioch-college.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0111141142410.12205-100000 newton.csun.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Resent-Message-ID: <"QU4Wj3.0.oV2.JWhyx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45281
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

John
	In a colloqium last year I heard a talk about solar cell research,
based on Si and GaAs, and they approached 30% efficiency by using three
cells one above the other, which were transparent in some bands letting
radiation through to lower cells, and absorbed in other frequency regions. 

Hank 

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Wed Nov 14 10:56:12 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id KAA21321;
	Wed, 14 Nov 2001 10:53:23 -0800
Resent-Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 10:53:23 -0800
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20011114133752.033ed8e8 pop.mindspring.com>
X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 13:53:21 -0500
To: vortex-L eskimo.com
From: Jed Rothwell <jedrothwell infinite-energy.com>
Subject: Re: And they......Re: A little help
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0111141142410.12205-100000 newton.csun.edu>
References: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1011113223431.14590C-100000 college.antioch-college.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Resent-Message-ID: <"lUhox1.0.yC5.Zshyx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45282
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

hank scudder wrote:

>In a colloqium last year I heard a talk about solar cell research, based 
>on Si and GaAs, and they approached 30% efficiency by using three cells 
>one above the other . . .

Ed Storms and others have criticized the PV industry for chasing after the 
wrong goals. The industry focuses on efficiency too much, at the expense of 
other performance parameters. They should be thinking about:

* Cost, which is based on ease of manufacturing, the choice of raw 
materials and so on. A 10% efficient cell that costs $1 is better than a 
30% efficient cell for $5. Taking up three times more space is not a 
problem. There is plenty of untapped sunlight, on roofs and places like that.

* Long term efficiency, not just the initial output. I'll bet that 30% was 
measured for the first six months. If it is still 20% after ten years they 
are on to something, but not if the cell rapidly degrades.

* Embodied energy pay back. All else being equal, a higher conversion 
efficiency will improve this.

Many PV limitations have little to do with efficiency or the PV cell 
itself, and more to do with cleaning the surface, preventing leaks, and 
preventing deleterious change to packaging, glue, and other components from 
long term exposure to light, heat and temperature extremes. A PV is left 
outside in bright sunlight, which is a bad place to put a manufactured good 
or machine. It is a harsh environment. By the same token, the roads are 
hell on automobiles, wind turbine blades are worn away by the wind, and the 
generators eventually wear out from the constant movement, stopping and 
starting.

Many CF problems are also rooted in mundane materials issues, and such 
things as bacteria growing in heavy water. We need high flow physics 
theories I suppose, but we also need clean recombination catalysts that do 
not foul the electrolyte. Most replications fail because of  mundane 
blunders, such as the wrong sized anode.

- Jed

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Wed Nov 14 11:02:39 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id LAA24854;
	Wed, 14 Nov 2001 11:01:14 -0800
Resent-Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 11:01:14 -0800
X-Apparently-From: <cjford1 yahoo.com>
Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.20011114120050.009535c0 pop.mail.yahoo.com>
X-Sender: cjford1 pop.mail.yahoo.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58 
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 12:22:24 -0600
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
From: Charles Ford <cjford1 yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: A little help
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20011113174250.0341c1c0 pop.mindspring.com>
References: <4.2.0.58.20011113140638.009572d0 pop.mail.yahoo.com>
 <5.1.0.14.2.20011113125420.0341c1c0 pop.mindspring.com>
 <Pine.GSO.3.96.1011112173441.1542K-100000 college.antioch-c ollege.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Resent-Message-ID: <"gG7hs1.0.F46.vzhyx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45283
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

At 05:59 PM 11/13/01 -0500, you wrote:
>decline is less steep than PVs, and useful service continues until a major 
>overhaul or a change in regulations makes continued maintenance 
>uneconomical. The whole system is then scrapped. I doubt that productivity 
>has typically fallen by half when the system is scrapped.

This is the point at which a "referbish" rather then resyscl.

There is the basic process (as I see it)  The dead arrey is opened and the 
chips are removed, cleaned and tested.  those that pass a minimum 
performance standard are used to make new arrays.

>Automobile batteries seem to fall off rather drastically and continuously 
>in performance, in my personal experience. This may be a problem with 
>electric cars.

This is an issue that has been solved with an electronic desulphator.  This 
device keeps the surface of the plates active preventing the sulphurous 
coaling from deposition that ultimately causes the led acid battery to 
short.  I have only short experience with these devices but they come 
highly recommended by others who have been able to greatly extend the life 
of there batteries.

>>If you can show me enough silicon solar equipment failing that I can 
>>justify a service / recycling center I can get it set up.
>
>I think it unlikely that silicon would be worth recycling. The raw 
>material is sand -- very cheap.

Sand is cheap.  Silicon is however not.  Industrial silicon is not from 
beach sand.  It is a special sand (brazil sand) that comes from crushing 
quartz.  The raw material is mined and crushed then refined using a very 
energy costly smelting process.  Actually recycling dead chips would likely 
be an option.  but this is not what I am referring to.

The Fort Worth based company that I have in mind has been making millions 
annually on a regular basis doing the refurbishing jobs that others have 
thought ether impossible or not cost effective.  What I am basically 
getting at is that the companies that make the chips are not coming to tell 
you that they can be recycled and DOE doesn't actually do the work there 
selves (they contract the manufacturers to do the studies)

So what really needs to happen is that some failed equipment needs to 
become available to be analyzed by people who aren't trying to sell new ones.

Charlie Ford

KC5-OWZ
cjford1 yahoo.com
cjford1 swbell.net

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free  yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Wed Nov 14 12:04:56 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id MAA24434;
	Wed, 14 Nov 2001 12:01:55 -0800
Resent-Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 12:01:55 -0800
From: Robin van Spaandonk <rvanspaa bigpond.net.au>
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: earthlink.net
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 07:01:18 +1100
Organization: Improving
Message-ID: <t9j5vtcm2obfmd1a7sa5defqbi0egnv88s 4ax.com>
X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.553
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id MAA24385
Resent-Message-ID: <"Y1rLk2.0.cz5.psiyx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45284
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

Hi Fred,

I tried sending you private email, but your isp won't talk to mine,
hence this public message. (Sorry to the rest of you).


Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/

....Put the "bottom line" at the top!

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Wed Nov 14 18:19:18 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id SAA04788;
	Wed, 14 Nov 2001 18:16:45 -0800
Resent-Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 18:16:45 -0800
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 21:24:24 -0500 (EST)
From: John Schnurer <herman antioch-college.edu>
To: Vortex <vortex-l eskimo.com>
Subject: Color Temperature Chart of Red hot steel  Please
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1011114211537.20194I-100000 college.antioch-college.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Resent-Message-ID: <"ZV3yG3.0.jA1.CMoyx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45285
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 



	Dear Vo.,

	I am trying to find a copy of the color-temperature chart that
used to be used for heating steel

	I am not sure this is correct, but from memory is is:

	
	In Centigade:

	850 to 950			Red
	950 to 1,050 			bright or cherry Red
	1,050	to	1,150		orange
	1,150 	to	1,250		yellow 
	1,250 to 	1,350 		straw
	1,350	to	1,450		incipient incandescence 
	1,450	to	1,550		incandescence



	Is this correct?

	Can anyone out  there let me know?



From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Wed Nov 14 19:44:02 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id TAA11348;
	Wed, 14 Nov 2001 19:40:58 -0800
Resent-Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 19:40:58 -0800
Message-ID: <000101c16da0$48227fe0$b045ccd1 asus>
From: "Mike Carrell" <mikec snip.net>
To: <vortex-l eskimo.com>
References: <4.2.0.58.20011113140638.009572d0 pop.mail.yahoo.com> <Pine.GSO.3.96.1011112173441.1542K-100000@college.antioch-c ollege.edu> <4.2.0.58.20011113140638.009572d0@pop.mail.yahoo.com> <5.1.0.14.2.20011114122703.00ab3ba0@pop.mindspring.com>
Subject: Re: A little help
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 16:51:51 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
Resent-Message-ID: <"C48Hu.0.En2.9bpyx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45286
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

Some general comments in response to remarks by Jed and Standing Bear.

About solar systems, thermal and PV. The significant cost is in the support
and collection systems for the collectors, not so much as the collectors
themselves. Inefficient PV cells may be cheap, but you need more acres of
them than if they were efficient. There are complex tradeoffs which have
been studied to death over decades. Great efforts have gone into designing
passive, non-focusing collector surfaces to concentrate sunlight from a
large area to a small cell. If the cells are extremely cheap, you can cover
buildings with them, but you will then discover other system problems. As
the volume of manufacture increases, the cost comes down, and the optimum
tradeoff in systems design shifts and will continue to shift.

About manufacturing.

If you are making small quantities of something, invest minimal effort in
design and production control and make it fixable with nuts and bolts, etc.
And, it will be expensive.

If you are making large quantities of something, invest heavily in design
for manufacture and manufacturing engineering and manufacturing process
control. The items will be cheaper and more reliable, but not "fixable";
however the life-cycle cost will be lower than for a "fixable" item. This
was the way shown by Edwards Deming, which the Japanese auto industry took
to heart, resulting in high quality, reliable, affordable cars.

If you see a product full of screws, etc., it comes from a country with very
cheap labor and low on the learning curve of efficient manufacture.

Mike Carrell

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Wed Nov 14 19:51:45 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id TAA15993;
	Wed, 14 Nov 2001 19:50:41 -0800
Resent-Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 19:50:41 -0800
X-Apparently-From: <cjford1 yahoo.com>
Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.20011114214724.00ae0a90 pop.mail.yahoo.com>
X-Sender: cjford1 pop.mail.yahoo.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58 
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 21:50:22 +0000
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
From: Charles Ford <cjford1 yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: And they......Re: A little help
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0111141142410.12205-100000 newton.csun.edu>
References: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1011113223431.14590C-100000 college.antioch-college.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Resent-Message-ID: <"zXLPe2.0.ov3.Gkpyx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45287
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

At 11:48 AM 11/14/01 -0800, you wrote:
>John
>         In a colloqium last year I heard a talk about solar cell research,
>based on Si and GaAs, and they approached 30% efficiency by using three
>cells one above the other, which were transparent in some bands letting
>radiation through to lower cells, and absorbed in other frequency regions.
>
>Hank

Yes  there are multi layer cells already in production.  (sort of like 
color film)

Let me hunt for the link to the companies web site.




_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free  yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Thu Nov 15 19:06:11 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id TAA29117;
	Thu, 15 Nov 2001 19:03:31 -0800
Resent-Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 19:03:31 -0800
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 22:11:08 -0500 (EST)
From: John Schnurer <herman antioch-college.edu>
To: Schnurer <herman antioch-college.edu>
cc: Vortex <vortex-l eskimo.com>
Subject: color
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1011115220838.18624B-100000 college.antioch-college.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Resent-Message-ID: <"ZyL7-2.0.g67.288zx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45288
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 



	Dear Folks:

	I think these figures are low.....
	Any other contributions?

> 
> Color				deg F	deg C
> faint red visible in dark	750	399
> faint red			900	482
> blood red			1050	565
> dark cherry			1075	579
> medium cherry			1250	677
> cherry or full red		1375	746
> bright red			1550	843
> salmon			1650	899
> orange			1725	940
> lemon				1825	996
> light yellow			1975	1079
> white				2200	1204
> dazzling white		2350	1288
> 


From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Thu Nov 15 19:16:08 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id TAA03799;
	Thu, 15 Nov 2001 19:15:26 -0800
Resent-Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 19:15:26 -0800
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Standing Bear <rockcast net-link.net>
To: vortex-l eskimo.com, Jed Rothwell <jedrothwell@infinite-energy.com>
Subject: Re: A little help
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 22:17:20 -0500
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2]
References: <4.2.0.58.20011113140638.009572d0 pop.mail.yahoo.com> <5.1.0.14.2.20011114122703.00ab3ba0@pop.mindspring.com>
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20011114122703.00ab3ba0 pop.mindspring.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <01111522172001.01902 linux>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id TAA03719
Resent-Message-ID: <"lbbA82.0.Ax.DJ8zx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45289
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

On Wednesday 14 November 2001 12:50, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> Standing Bear wrote:
> >         Part of the problem may just be our throw-away society.
> >We throw away anything and everything, even people. . . .
>
> As far as I know, most major U.S. durable goods last longer today than they
> did 50 years ago, including such things as automobiles, refrigerators,
> radios, power tools and roofing material. Product warranties and safety are
> greatly improved, thanks to competition and pressure from consumer
> organizations and regulators.

Give you the automobile paint jobs, but refrigerators often quit after 6 years
or so;  roofing material is often a joke today.  I know about roofing 
materials, I have used them in my trailer and RV park.  Believe it, the old
shingles had more aggregate and better bitumen;  less likely to become
brittle with time.....it ALL does, just the new stuff goes to h__ in a 
handbasket much faster.  As to power tools, my son works in a trailer
factory and I have bought power tools for years.  I only buy Milwaukee
that is made in the United States, and my Timothy only buys DeWalt.
All the rest self destruct as soon as they are called on to do real work.
It did not use to be that way.  The old ones were all metal and were
all serviceable.  As one with experience who has actually USED the
equipment and actually worn it out, I must tell you that non user
servicable equipment is largely JUNK.  I will not buy it, and will not
get up on a ladder with it knowing I will be right down the ladder to
replace it.  Prime example of your reference to quality non-servicable
is a Black and Decker drill I once had.  It said variable speed and
claimed on the box to be able to drive screws.  On the first screw
I could smell it cook.  Gave up on that claim and only used it for a
drill from then on.  A year later (one year 'limited warranty.......what
a coincidence?!) the bearings started to sing to me.  On disassembly
I found that the bearing housings were part of a weak PLASTIC webbing
on the inside that had ovaled out.  The whole thing was about to
literally explode out of its' plastic case and tear up its unfortunate
user's hand........or face.  Competition........hah!  Monopolies and
interlocking directorates and international cartels have seen to that.
Regulation........now that is a real howler!  Ever hear of:
      b - r - i - b - e - r - y? and  c - o - r - r - u - p - t - i - o - n?
How about naming industry ex execs to regulatory positions, or political
favors in return for contributions, like when ex President George H. Bush
sold ambassadorships to cronies for $300,000.00 a pop......minor 
countries, of course, but the office came fully equipped with all the
perks and free travel, etc.  I worked in one trailer factory as a design
engineer.  Regularly the Indiana inspector would come by.  My
group leader had his bottle of Jack Daniels ready for him, and it
was an open 'secret' that the company president's secretary
was 'available'.  We NEVER got a writup from those inspectors









>
> This kind of information is more readily available today, thanks to
> government regulations and the Internet.

depends on how much of your privacy you want to trade, or credit
cards, cookies, and romote administration programs! 
>

>
> On the contrary, I have found most Chinese models very shoddy. 

Kindly check the inside of your computer.......yes, yours!  In amongst the
Malaysian chips and Thai drive motors and Korean memory will be
maybe a motherboard that was really made in the People's Republic
notwithstanding any Taiwanese labeling.   Heh!  Heh!   Did you actually
believe all those consumer goods labeled 'Hong Kong' were REALLY 
made there.  Where are they now?  If you believed that, well then I 
know of some land in Florida that would be a real ..........................
Darn, I already sold that to the Easter Bunny!


U.S.  products are often so good they have priced themselves out of the 
market.

Like how we handed the motorcycle industry to the Japanese on a plate.
We as a nation collectively refused to recognize that a market existed for
a reliable small motorcycle.  All we were willing to sell the public was
an unsafe motor scooter, a Cushman, for $1200 in the early 1960's  Along
came Honda with the 305cc 'Dream' that was stylish, much safer
larger wheels meant larger radius of gyration and far mor stable gyroscopic
stability.  The dream ran like a Swiss watch and did so for years.  It
did not leak oil or break the rider's tailbone in normal riding.  It had
brakes that worked and its cables did not constantly break.  You could
actually find the gears in the transmission and it would not automatically
dump its rider on a bumpy road or a gravel one.  It had a top speed......
I could go on.  Americans voted with their wallets for that product
which gave value for the money.  Where is Cushman now?
Do you even remember it ?  Were you living then?  We had a bad
product and arrogantly thought that no one would take our customers
from us.  How wrong our corporate domestic monopolists were!



> >Even the lowest toy is put together with screws.  Many screws!  Yes! Even
> >the toys are maintainable.  The Chinese have a reverence for science and
> >the future that is to be commended.
>
> I admire Chinese civilization as much as anyone, but their manufacturers
> and political leaders are not know for having a reverence for science, the
> future, or anything else. They are rapacious, corrupt and money grubbing,
> unrestrained by traditions or legal restrictions. I have not seen screws in
> many Chinese goods. For that kind of "quality" look at Japanese products.
> Actually, that is probably a sign of obsolescence rather than quality.
> Screws work loose and fall out. Other fasteners are more reliable, although
> some cannot be opened.

My grandson has many toys.  Just about all of them seem to be from China
The People's Republic.....even if the 'people' do not really have a free
voting choice on who will lead their 'republic'.  They ALL have screws
in them.  Only the Chinese toys seem to me made this way.  Even the
plastic ones.  They do not work loose in the normal life of the toy.  I got
one of my young man's toys, a squirt gun, to use to repel our cat from
jumping up on our dining table at mealtimes.  It was put together with
screws as well, with a small tank inside for the water.  It did not leak!
Just about every squirt gun made here did.  They were just two halfs
of plastic glued together badly and plunked into the stores to sell for
59 cents.  Probably more now.
	As for technology.  In the early days of Chinese market
penetration of our country, floppy discs were the carriers of software.
Chinese disks always seemed to be wrapped in  heavy gold foil
lined multicolored printed kraft envelopes with string clasps, as if
they thought it was something special to them.  The manuals from
them always had some laughers in them in the grammar, but were
reasonably complete.
	I think that you miss the point on the corruption.  Communism
teaches honest in personal affairs, yet feels free to lie whenever
it is felt that it furthers some 'end'.  Some of it may be there, but the
penalty if caught is very severe.......death! for personal embezzlers,
etc.  They have them.  Many of them.  They catch them too.  And
shoot them after show trials.  Witness their 'Strike Hard!' campaign
sweeping their country now.  They are not innocent children, and
as a government have lied about much.  Mostly about the slave
labor camps used to produce goods for our consumer market.   That
is why we under 'free trade' cannot make our own consumer goods .
Our factories cannot  compete with slave labor producing the same
goods with the same machines that we would use.  Besides, our
factories have all moved to China anyway.  If we ever fought a
war with China, we would have to go naked and barefooted.  The
rapaciousness has been our own.  Offered deals and low wage
environments, and bought and paid for officials over here singing
the mantra of 'free trade', our means of production has steadily
and inexorably been making a 'long march' of its own to Sczhenzhen
Province in China north of Hong Kong.  It is we who are corrupt.
Corrupt to the very soul.  God help us all!!
>
> Many products, such as bearings on automobiles, had to be maintained in the
> 1950s, but today they are in a sealed, inaccessible module. They cannot be
> maintained. Once they wear out, they can only be replaced. This is not a
> sign of laziness, or decreased quality, and it is not a waste of resources.
> Sealed bearings last longer. They can be fabricated with greater precision
> so they produce less friction and thus save energy. They are less likely to
> catch on fire than the old-fashioned ones. It takes less labor to replace
> them, so automobile mechanics can be more productive and earn a decent
> living. 

I was in on some of the design of these 'non-servicable' bearings.  What
you really mean is ball joints.  Bearings have always been servicable
in autos here and really always will.  There is no such thing as a 
really 'sealed' bearing.  Ball joints in the early seventies
and late sixties had no grease injection joints.  A decent grease had
been formulated that was said to be reliable for 50,000 miles, or so
Ford executives had claimed.  It was not to be.  No auto reliablility
lab could really effectively duplicate field conditions in extremis, and
winter in the northeast was certainly that.  I had such joints on my
1973 Mercury Monterrey.  When the ball joints went dry and made
noise, I found that no grease injectors were there.  In their place
were small plugs!   My mechanic replaced these with injectors
and lubed my joints.  I was a student then and informed my bosses
in the engineering department what I had found.  They then showed
me a mountain of warrantee claims kept in a large office building
in south Dearborn that were going to force a change to the sealed
ball joint design.  It was an experiment that had failed.  Its design
had been calculated to reduce maintainance labor; this would 
have resulted in many mechanics actually losing their jobs had it
really worked.



Our society puts more value on human labor -- people's time -- than
> materials. 

No it does'nt.  Look at how slave labor in China is depressing our
wage structure.  There will be a 'day of reckoning', and that will be
when our overburdened 'middle class' finally realizes that it is'nt
any more and starts to live within its means.....poverty.  When they
stop buying, the whole house of cards of international corporate
monopolists will start to crumble......fast!

That's a good thing. If scrap material increases significantly
> because of that decision, and waste becomes a problem, it should be
> recycled.



Ever been to a recycling center?   Ever even been to a city dump!?
I used to manage a solid waste program for the Air Force.  Believe
it, you have NEVER in your entire life seen a more heterogeneous
mixture less tractable to mechanized recycling
>

Humbly,,,

Standing Bear
rockcast net-link.net

If we do not run out of energy and starve in the dark and freeze,
we will drown in our own trash!   Look at the garbage blob that
every once in a while shows signs of moving back toward
New York  from its restless watery grave.

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Thu Nov 15 19:39:40 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id TAA14732;
	Thu, 15 Nov 2001 19:36:50 -0800
Resent-Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 19:36:50 -0800
Message-ID: <3BF48A09.2D24EC77 enter.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 22:37:45 -0500
From: David Rosignoli <drdaveor enter.net>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (Win98; I)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
CC: Schnurer <herman antioch-college.edu>
Subject: Re: color
References: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1011115220838.18624B-100000 college.antioch-college.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Resent-Message-ID: <"hkG3y2.0.6c3.Hd8zx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45290
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

Pg. 530 of the Procedures in Experimental Physicsm, Table VIII, give the
following generic color temperatures (it doesn't specify steel):

Color 			Approximate Temperature (deg. C)
Incipient Red Heat	500 to 550
Dark Red Heat		700
Bright Red Heat		900
Yellowish-Red Heat	1100
Incipient White Heat	1300
White Heat		1500

Or try this:
http://www.sweethaven.com/academic/lessons/021100/00/tab0201.gif



John Schnurer wrote:
> 
>         Dear Folks:
> 
>         I think these figures are low.....
>         Any other contributions?
> 
> >
> > Color                         deg F   deg C
> > faint red visible in dark     750     399
> > faint red                     900     482
> > blood red                     1050    565
> > dark cherry                   1075    579
> > medium cherry                 1250    677
> > cherry or full red            1375    746
> > bright red                    1550    843
> > salmon                        1650    899
> > orange                        1725    940
> > lemon                         1825    996
> > light yellow                  1975    1079
> > white                         2200    1204
> > dazzling white                2350    1288
> >

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Thu Nov 15 19:45:02 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id TAA19598;
	Thu, 15 Nov 2001 19:44:32 -0800
Resent-Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 19:44:32 -0800
X-Apparently-From: <cjford1 yahoo.com>
Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.20011115211911.00b016c0 pop.mail.yahoo.com>
X-Sender: cjford1 pop.mail.yahoo.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58 
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 21:44:33 +0000
To: herman antioch-college.edu
From: Charles Ford <cjford1 yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: A little help
Cc: vortex-l eskimo.com
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1011112173441.1542K-100000 college.antioch-c
 ollege.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Resent-Message-ID: <"hfvGP3.0.8o4.Wk8zx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45291
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

John:

I talked to Morice this afternoon about solar panel refurbishing.  He seems 
rather excited about it.  Here is a brief plan for pulling it off should he 
decide to go forward with this service.

First thing is to acquire some panels that are at/near there end of 
service.  Time and cost estimates can be made for several types of panels 
on disassembling the array cleaning and re-fitting.  These people are 
excellent at rebuilding electronics and special process devices.  They even 
do LCD and plasma displays.

Once a cost estimate is made then the word can be put out to solar 
equipment dealers
that unserviceable arrays can be recycled. The first panels can be 
purchased at 10% of the replacement value.  Once some stock is built up in 
the used equipment then a core charge/rebate can be set up.

This will offer a cost break to the replacement panel buyer and possibly 
attract new buyers to the industry if you place the cost of a rebuilt array 
at something like 70% that of a new one.

Still no go without first analyzing some dead arrays.

I you know where we can get some I would appreciate it




_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free  yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Thu Nov 15 23:35:50 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id XAA00681;
	Thu, 15 Nov 2001 23:33:14 -0800
Resent-Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 23:33:14 -0800
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 02:40:54 -0500 (EST)
From: John Schnurer <herman antioch-college.edu>
To: Charles Ford <cjford1 yahoo.com>
cc: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Re: A little help
In-Reply-To: <4.2.0.58.20011115211911.00b016c0 pop.mail.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1011116024038.24629E-100000 college.antioch-college.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Resent-Message-ID: <"91bLO2.0.UA.w4Czx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45292
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 


	I will scout around


On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Charles Ford wrote:

> John:
> 
> I talked to Morice this afternoon about solar panel refurbishing.  He seems 
> rather excited about it.  Here is a brief plan for pulling it off should he 
> decide to go forward with this service.
> 
> First thing is to acquire some panels that are at/near there end of 
> service.  Time and cost estimates can be made for several types of panels 
> on disassembling the array cleaning and re-fitting.  These people are 
> excellent at rebuilding electronics and special process devices.  They even 
> do LCD and plasma displays.
> 
> Once a cost estimate is made then the word can be put out to solar 
> equipment dealers
> that unserviceable arrays can be recycled. The first panels can be 
> purchased at 10% of the replacement value.  Once some stock is built up in 
> the used equipment then a core charge/rebate can be set up.
> 
> This will offer a cost break to the replacement panel buyer and possibly 
> attract new buyers to the industry if you place the cost of a rebuilt array 
> at something like 70% that of a new one.
> 
> Still no go without first analyzing some dead arrays.
> 
> I you know where we can get some I would appreciate it
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _________________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get your free  yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
> 

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Fri Nov 16 00:07:14 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id AAA13595;
	Fri, 16 Nov 2001 00:04:23 -0800
Resent-Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 00:04:23 -0800
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 03:12:03 -0500 (EST)
From: John Schnurer <herman antioch-college.edu>
To: Standing Bear <rockcast net-link.net>
cc: vortex-l eskimo.com, Jed Rothwell <jedrothwell@infinite-energy.com>
Subject: Re: A little help
In-Reply-To: <01111522172001.01902 linux>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1011116030900.24629P-100000 college.antioch-college.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Resent-Message-ID: <"KJfVe.0.LK3.7YCzx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45293
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 




	Dear SB,

	It is OK to show beefs ...but I am trying to work toward better..


	Here in US Norcold makes an ammonia absorbtion refridgerator, zero
moving parts.... last 30 to 80 years..... there is an 80 year one running
in Dayton OH.

	Not everything is poorly made.


	Do you know of any people or groups that want real world direct
energy conversion?




					J

				

On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Standing Bear wrote:

> On Wednesday 14 November 2001 12:50, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> > Standing Bear wrote:
> > >         Part of the problem may just be our throw-away society.
> > >We throw away anything and everything, even people. . . .
> >
> > As far as I know, most major U.S. durable goods last longer today than they
> > did 50 years ago, including such things as automobiles, refrigerators,
> > radios, power tools and roofing material. Product warranties and safety are
> > greatly improved, thanks to competition and pressure from consumer
> > organizations and regulators.
> 
> Give you the automobile paint jobs, but refrigerators often quit after 6 years
> or so;  roofing material is often a joke today.  I know about roofing 
> materials, I have used them in my trailer and RV park.  Believe it, the old
> shingles had more aggregate and better bitumen;  less likely to become
> brittle with time.....it ALL does, just the new stuff goes to h__ in a 
> handbasket much faster.  As to power tools, my son works in a trailer
> factory and I have bought power tools for years.  I only buy Milwaukee
> that is made in the United States, and my Timothy only buys DeWalt.
> All the rest self destruct as soon as they are called on to do real work.
> It did not use to be that way.  The old ones were all metal and were
> all serviceable.  As one with experience who has actually USED the
> equipment and actually worn it out, I must tell you that non user
> servicable equipment is largely JUNK.  I will not buy it, and will not
> get up on a ladder with it knowing I will be right down the ladder to
> replace it.  Prime example of your reference to quality non-servicable
> is a Black and Decker drill I once had.  It said variable speed and
> claimed on the box to be able to drive screws.  On the first screw
> I could smell it cook.  Gave up on that claim and only used it for a
> drill from then on.  A year later (one year 'limited warranty.......what
> a coincidence?!) the bearings started to sing to me.  On disassembly
> I found that the bearing housings were part of a weak PLASTIC webbing
> on the inside that had ovaled out.  The whole thing was about to
> literally explode out of its' plastic case and tear up its unfortunate
> user's hand........or face.  Competition........hah!  Monopolies and
> interlocking directorates and international cartels have seen to that.
> Regulation........now that is a real howler!  Ever hear of:
>       b - r - i - b - e - r - y? and  c - o - r - r - u - p - t - i - o - n?
> How about naming industry ex execs to regulatory positions, or political
> favors in return for contributions, like when ex President George H. Bush
> sold ambassadorships to cronies for $300,000.00 a pop......minor 
> countries, of course, but the office came fully equipped with all the
> perks and free travel, etc.  I worked in one trailer factory as a design
> engineer.  Regularly the Indiana inspector would come by.  My
> group leader had his bottle of Jack Daniels ready for him, and it
> was an open 'secret' that the company president's secretary
> was 'available'.  We NEVER got a writup from those inspectors
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> >
> > This kind of information is more readily available today, thanks to
> > government regulations and the Internet.
> 
> depends on how much of your privacy you want to trade, or credit
> cards, cookies, and romote administration programs! 
> >
> 
> >
> > On the contrary, I have found most Chinese models very shoddy. 
> 
> Kindly check the inside of your computer.......yes, yours!  In amongst the
> Malaysian chips and Thai drive motors and Korean memory will be
> maybe a motherboard that was really made in the People's Republic
> notwithstanding any Taiwanese labeling.   Heh!  Heh!   Did you actually
> believe all those consumer goods labeled 'Hong Kong' were REALLY 
> made there.  Where are they now?  If you believed that, well then I 
> know of some land in Florida that would be a real ..........................
> Darn, I already sold that to the Easter Bunny!
> 
> 
> U.S.  products are often so good they have priced themselves out of the 
> market.
> 
> Like how we handed the motorcycle industry to the Japanese on a plate.
> We as a nation collectively refused to recognize that a market existed for
> a reliable small motorcycle.  All we were willing to sell the public was
> an unsafe motor scooter, a Cushman, for $1200 in the early 1960's  Along
> came Honda with the 305cc 'Dream' that was stylish, much safer
> larger wheels meant larger radius of gyration and far mor stable gyroscopic
> stability.  The dream ran like a Swiss watch and did so for years.  It
> did not leak oil or break the rider's tailbone in normal riding.  It had
> brakes that worked and its cables did not constantly break.  You could
> actually find the gears in the transmission and it would not automatically
> dump its rider on a bumpy road or a gravel one.  It had a top speed......
> I could go on.  Americans voted with their wallets for that product
> which gave value for the money.  Where is Cushman now?
> Do you even remember it ?  Were you living then?  We had a bad
> product and arrogantly thought that no one would take our customers
> from us.  How wrong our corporate domestic monopolists were!
> 
> 
> 
> > >Even the lowest toy is put together with screws.  Many screws!  Yes! Even
> > >the toys are maintainable.  The Chinese have a reverence for science and
> > >the future that is to be commended.
> >
> > I admire Chinese civilization as much as anyone, but their manufacturers
> > and political leaders are not know for having a reverence for science, the
> > future, or anything else. They are rapacious, corrupt and money grubbing,
> > unrestrained by traditions or legal restrictions. I have not seen screws in
> > many Chinese goods. For that kind of "quality" look at Japanese products.
> > Actually, that is probably a sign of obsolescence rather than quality.
> > Screws work loose and fall out. Other fasteners are more reliable, although
> > some cannot be opened.
> 
> My grandson has many toys.  Just about all of them seem to be from China
> The People's Republic.....even if the 'people' do not really have a free
> voting choice on who will lead their 'republic'.  They ALL have screws
> in them.  Only the Chinese toys seem to me made this way.  Even the
> plastic ones.  They do not work loose in the normal life of the toy.  I got
> one of my young man's toys, a squirt gun, to use to repel our cat from
> jumping up on our dining table at mealtimes.  It was put together with
> screws as well, with a small tank inside for the water.  It did not leak!
> Just about every squirt gun made here did.  They were just two halfs
> of plastic glued together badly and plunked into the stores to sell for
> 59 cents.  Probably more now.
> 	As for technology.  In the early days of Chinese market
> penetration of our country, floppy discs were the carriers of software.
> Chinese disks always seemed to be wrapped in  heavy gold foil
> lined multicolored printed kraft envelopes with string clasps, as if
> they thought it was something special to them.  The manuals from
> them always had some laughers in them in the grammar, but were
> reasonably complete.
> 	I think that you miss the point on the corruption.  Communism
> teaches honest in personal affairs, yet feels free to lie whenever
> it is felt that it furthers some 'end'.  Some of it may be there, but the
> penalty if caught is very severe.......death! for personal embezzlers,
> etc.  They have them.  Many of them.  They catch them too.  And
> shoot them after show trials.  Witness their 'Strike Hard!' campaign
> sweeping their country now.  They are not innocent children, and
> as a government have lied about much.  Mostly about the slave
> labor camps used to produce goods for our consumer market.   That
> is why we under 'free trade' cannot make our own consumer goods .
> Our factories cannot  compete with slave labor producing the same
> goods with the same machines that we would use.  Besides, our
> factories have all moved to China anyway.  If we ever fought a
> war with China, we would have to go naked and barefooted.  The
> rapaciousness has been our own.  Offered deals and low wage
> environments, and bought and paid for officials over here singing
> the mantra of 'free trade', our means of production has steadily
> and inexorably been making a 'long march' of its own to Sczhenzhen
> Province in China north of Hong Kong.  It is we who are corrupt.
> Corrupt to the very soul.  God help us all!!
> >
> > Many products, such as bearings on automobiles, had to be maintained in the
> > 1950s, but today they are in a sealed, inaccessible module. They cannot be
> > maintained. Once they wear out, they can only be replaced. This is not a
> > sign of laziness, or decreased quality, and it is not a waste of resources.
> > Sealed bearings last longer. They can be fabricated with greater precision
> > so they produce less friction and thus save energy. They are less likely to
> > catch on fire than the old-fashioned ones. It takes less labor to replace
> > them, so automobile mechanics can be more productive and earn a decent
> > living. 
> 
> I was in on some of the design of these 'non-servicable' bearings.  What
> you really mean is ball joints.  Bearings have always been servicable
> in autos here and really always will.  There is no such thing as a 
> really 'sealed' bearing.  Ball joints in the early seventies
> and late sixties had no grease injection joints.  A decent grease had
> been formulated that was said to be reliable for 50,000 miles, or so
> Ford executives had claimed.  It was not to be.  No auto reliablility
> lab could really effectively duplicate field conditions in extremis, and
> winter in the northeast was certainly that.  I had such joints on my
> 1973 Mercury Monterrey.  When the ball joints went dry and made
> noise, I found that no grease injectors were there.  In their place
> were small plugs!   My mechanic replaced these with injectors
> and lubed my joints.  I was a student then and informed my bosses
> in the engineering department what I had found.  They then showed
> me a mountain of warrantee claims kept in a large office building
> in south Dearborn that were going to force a change to the sealed
> ball joint design.  It was an experiment that had failed.  Its design
> had been calculated to reduce maintainance labor; this would 
> have resulted in many mechanics actually losing their jobs had it
> really worked.
> 
> 
> 
> Our society puts more value on human labor -- people's time -- than
> > materials. 
> 
> No it does'nt.  Look at how slave labor in China is depressing our
> wage structure.  There will be a 'day of reckoning', and that will be
> when our overburdened 'middle class' finally realizes that it is'nt
> any more and starts to live within its means.....poverty.  When they
> stop buying, the whole house of cards of international corporate
> monopolists will start to crumble......fast!
> 
> That's a good thing. If scrap material increases significantly
> > because of that decision, and waste becomes a problem, it should be
> > recycled.
> 
> 
> 
> Ever been to a recycling center?   Ever even been to a city dump!?
> I used to manage a solid waste program for the Air Force.  Believe
> it, you have NEVER in your entire life seen a more heterogeneous
> mixture less tractable to mechanized recycling
> >
> 
> Humbly,,,
> 
> Standing Bear
> rockcast net-link.net
> 
> If we do not run out of energy and starve in the dark and freeze,
> we will drown in our own trash!   Look at the garbage blob that
> every once in a while shows signs of moving back toward
> New York  from its restless watery grave.
> 

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Fri Nov 16 00:34:14 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id AAA22267;
	Fri, 16 Nov 2001 00:31:46 -0800
Resent-Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 00:31:46 -0800
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <a0510030bb81a7928ef33 [209.23.136.39]>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 02:32:00 -0600
To: Vortex-l eskimo.com
From: thomas malloy <temalloy metro.lakes.com>
Subject: Konzen claims overunity output
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
Resent-Message-ID: <"qoMs03.0.mR5.oxCzx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45294
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 



>From: "konehead" <konehead msn.com>
>
>
>Hi
>
>Well the Muller machine REALLY works.
>
>The machines Bill Muller has working right now are amazing...
>
>see at:
>www.theverylastpageoftheinternet.com
>
>check out the "big hydrogen generator" link...click on "go there" if you
>dont want to see the videos, but want to see the photos...
>
>
>
>my pulse-motors are also shown on this site of mine:
>http://www.geocities.com/koneheadx
>
>
>
>I made a replica of a 8magnet/14coil Muller plate generator and turn it with
>a DC motor and just  use weak ceramic magnets...see here:
>http://www.geocities.com/koneheadx/mullerplategenerator.html
>
>wtih 72W in, I get 170W out!!
>
>No fucking kidding and this is with all the coils "loaded" (shorted out) to
>get the maximum electrical drag....
>
>Never worked woith th Hamel spinners myself, but have heard of success with
>them   Bill Beatty has some write ups on them I have read recently.
>
>ciao
>Konehead
>
>
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: thomas malloy <temalloy metro.lakes.com>
>To: <konehead msn.com>
>Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:18 AM
>
>
>>  Dear Mr. Konzen;
>>
>>  We were having a discussion on Vortex-L about Muller Magnetics and
>>  your name came up as someone who had worked with his technology. I
>>  talked to Mr. Muller several years ago and passed on it because there
>>  was no reason that it should work. Have you done any work with the
>>  Hammel machine?
>>
>>  Sincerely
>>
>>  Thomas Malloy
>>  --
>>


-- 

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Fri Nov 16 09:58:04 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id JAA19105;
	Fri, 16 Nov 2001 09:53:54 -0800
Resent-Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 09:53:54 -0800
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20011116113828.00ab4370 pop.mindspring.com>
X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 12:09:21 -0500
To: vortex-L eskimo.com
From: Jed Rothwell <jedrothwell infinite-energy.com>
Subject: Science & learning as liberation Jihad
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Resent-Message-ID: <"o4AJM2.0.Fg4.mALzx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45295
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: RO
X-Status: 

This is somewhat off topic, but I am sure everyone is thinking about it. 
Here are some quotes from a letter by Izzat Majeed, published in last 
Friday's popular Pakistani daily The Nation, and quoted in the New York Times:

http//www.nytimes.com/2001/11/16/opinion/16FRIE.html

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

"We Muslims cannot keep blaming the West for all our ills. . . . The 
embarrassment of wretchedness among us is beyond repair. It is not just the 
poverty, the illiteracy and the absence of any commonly accepted social 
contract that define our sense of wretchedness; it is, rather, the 
increasing awareness among us that we have failed as a civil society by not 
confronting the historical, social and political demons within us.

Without a reformation in the practice of Islam that makes it move forward 
and not backward, there is no hope for us Muslims anywhere. . . . For more 
than a thousand years Islam has stood still because the mullahs, who became 
de facto clergy instead of genuine scholars, closed the door on `ijtehad' 
[reinterpreting Islam in light of modernity] . . .

Oxford and Cambridge were the `madrasas' of Christendom in the 13th 
century. Look where they are today -- among the leading institutions of 
education in the world. Where are our institutions of learning?"

[Addressing bin Laden, Mr. Majeed concluded] "The last thing [Muslims] need 
is the growing darkness in your caves. . . . True Jihad today is not in the 
hijacking of planes, but in the manufacturing of them."

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Needless to say, we are also held back by people who despise and fear 
science, modernity and the future. The problem is more pronounced in Muslim 
countries, but it afflicts everyone. To some extent, it is healthy to fear 
the unknown, to explore the future cautiously, and to preserve the past. It 
is healthy to be skeptical, and to demand many replications of an 
experiment before you believe the results. But some people go to extremes. 
A healthy, conservative instinct taken too far becomes pathological.

In my opinion, Francis Bacon was the founder of modern science, almost as 
great as Newton himself. He founded the culture, the philosophy or 
world-view. As Loren Eiseley wrote: "I have said that science does not come 
easily to men; they must be made to envision its possibilities. This was 
Bacon's role, and it is sheer folly to dismiss him, as some have sought to 
do, because he personally made no inventions. He did far more; by eloquence 
and an unparalleled glimpse of the possibilities contained in the new 
learning, he forced a backward-oriented culture to contemplate its own future."

Bacon considered the philosophy of science a fragile, transient thing -- a 
fringe philosophy, which would probably be crushed by war, plague 
or  barbarian invasions. He wrote in Latin because he feared English might 
be lost in a few centuries, the way other languages had been. He expected 
the Dark Ages to return, but he hoped that some part of his ideas, and the 
philosophy of science, would be preserved and would bloom again after each 
disaster. Nowadays we assume that science and technology are permanent 
institutions. We assume they are robust, everyone knows how much benefit 
they bring, and is in favor of them. We do not think of them as cultural 
artifacts -- a set of attitudes -- that might eventually stagnate or be 
forgotten. A hundred generations from now, we assume people will still know 
as much as we do, plus a great deal more, and they will still allow free 
enquiry.

When the Egyptian Pharaohs ruled, there was a large ministry assigned to 
administer their tombs. It protected and maintained the property and kept 
careful records. A thief was captured trying to break into a tomb. 
Bureaucrats and judges questioned him in detail during a formal trial, 
which they recorded his name, age, his confession, and so on in detailed 
minutes. Archeologists unearthed the records a few years ago. These people 
must have assumed their ministry was a vital, essential institution that 
would last forever. They probably did not imagine that someday no would be 
left to guard the tombs. No one would care. The very location of many tombs 
would be forgotten. No institution -- no nation, way of life, philosophy or 
economic system -- is so strong and so beneficial that it is immune to 
stagnation and decay. Julian Schwinger was not exaggerating or being an 
alarmist when he said the oppression of cold fusion "will be the death of 
science."

Schwinger understood, as Bacon did, that people can be barbaric, great 
ideas can be lost, civilizations can go dreadfully astray for generations. 
Science will not die overnight, but the oppression of cold fusion may  mark 
the beginning of a long decline, a gradual hollowing out and negation of 
academic freedom. Since 1989 a generation of researchers has come of age 
which is comfortable with the idea that scientists should be ridiculed, 
persecuted, pilloried in the press and science journals, and hounded out of 
tenured positions because they want to investigate an unpopular idea in 
physics. This is a *very* serious problem. It is a long term problem, like 
the destruction of the rain forests or the overuse of antibiotics. It gets 
worse by degrees, as the old scientists retire, and the young who have 
known only conformity, stasis, and rule by fear take over.

Muslim nations once led the world in natural science and mathematics. We 
hope they will once again reclaim their traditions. I hope that we do not 
allow our own version of the Taliban, the publishers and the APS, to 
strangle these traditions in the meanwhile.

- Jed

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Fri Nov 16 14:25:44 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id OAA13927;
	Fri, 16 Nov 2001 14:21:39 -0800
Resent-Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 14:21:39 -0800
X-Authentication-Warning: smtp2.ihug.co.nz: Host p221-nas8.akl.ihug.co.nz [203.173.218.221] claimed to be ihug.co.nz
Message-ID: <3BF58DE4.52C43763 ihug.co.nz>
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2001 11:06:28 +1300
From: John Berry <antigrav ihug.co.nz>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: jlnlabs yahoogroups.com, vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Negative inductance
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Resent-Message-ID: <"vv4Vv3.0.WP3.p5Pzx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45296
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: RO
X-Status: A

An old idea I'm not about to do anything with personally:

Take a long laminated steel core.

Wind a coil (coil 1) on the center of it.

Wind another coil over the first but with a spacer separating it by a
few inches making the diameter of coil 2 much greater.
Give coil 2 more turns than coil 1, say 25% more.

Now connect coil 1 & 2 in series so that if current were to flow
clockwise through coil 1 it would be flowing counter clockwise through
coil 2.

Now if you apply a current the magnetic field from coil 1 will
predominate in the center, than much I know, so the steel will be
magnetized by coil 1.

Now the magnetic field from coil 1 as it expands induces an EMF that
opposes the current in this coil, this is of course inductance and on
collapse will try and keep the current flowing.

But that magnetic field from coil 1 is also inducing an EMF in coil 2 in
the reverse direction, and more strongly as it has more turns.

Obviously the magnetic field from coil 2 is also creating a somewhat
weaker magnetic field that is inducing both it's self and coil 1.

Anyway as the magnetic field from coil 1 is considerably stronger than
from coil 2 thanks to the steel core it's EMF is greater.

So now as we apply a current to the two coils we see the magnetic field
and EMF from coil 1 predominates, yet the 25% more turns from coil 2
should mean more voltage in induced in it from coil 1's magnetic field.
This means if everything is done right it would seem we have NEGATIVE
inductance.

I don't know if it will work out like that but the theory seems
interesting.
I did actually have an idea for another device that creates negative
inductance, it was a bifilar coil negatively charged.
I mentioned it in a Free Energy chat room and on Vortex, then an
appropriate amount of time later the exact same idea with the same
explanation was posted on the web:
http://www.geocities.com/nayado/
(I have no idea if it was just someone with the same idea or if he heard
me talk about it)

It's just an idea I'm probably not going to try so I figure I'd put it
out there for other people not to try too!

This idea might be interesting to Dough K and other magnet
motor/generator people.
Because if you used such a coil as a generator the magnetic field from
the magnets would saturate and induce an EMF in coil 2 (that would be
75% canceled by coil 1 but never the less) but the magnetic field of
coil 1 would be felt by the magnet, so it's anti lenz law, it's a motor
too.

I have seem motor/generators that people claimed worked and they had
such a setup.
Even if in such a case you only had coil 1 have a few turns placed at
the end of the core (closest to the magnet) it should still tip things
in favor of over unity so I suggest that all those who make such motors
try this it at least a little, it might make some difference and can't
really hurt.

I also have another idea that I've verified does strange things if any
of them want to contact me privately.

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Fri Nov 16 14:53:52 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id OAA30729;
	Fri, 16 Nov 2001 14:50:26 -0800
Resent-Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 14:50:26 -0800
Message-ID: <000801c16ef1$0f415c80$561fd140 usadatanet.net>
From: "Ryan Hopkins" <thebishop usadatanet.net>
To: <vortex-l eskimo.com>
References: <3BF58DE4.52C43763 ihug.co.nz>
Subject: Re: Negative inductance
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 17:50:14 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
Resent-Message-ID: <"owPLE1.0.3W7.oWPzx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45297
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: RO
X-Status: 

Strange things?  Details, please!

> I also have another idea that I've verified does strange things if any
> of them want to contact me privately.
> 

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Fri Nov 16 15:16:03 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id PAA08521;
	Fri, 16 Nov 2001 15:13:14 -0800
Resent-Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 15:13:14 -0800
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 16:31:23 -0800 (PST)
From: hank scudder <hjscudde newton.csun.edu>
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
cc: jlnlabs yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: Negative inductance
In-Reply-To: <3BF58DE4.52C43763 ihug.co.nz>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0111161630050.21093-100000 newton.csun.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Resent-Message-ID: <"Nqf3v3.0.u42.8sPzx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45298
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: RO
X-Status: 

John
	Get an engineering or physics textbook, and lookup Mutual
Inductance, and series connections of inductance.

Hank



On Sat, 17 Nov 2001, John Berry wrote:

> An old idea I'm not about to do anything with personally:
> 
> Take a long laminated steel core.
> 
> Wind a coil (coil 1) on the center of it.
> 
> Wind another coil over the first but with a spacer separating it by a
> few inches making the diameter of coil 2 much greater.
> Give coil 2 more turns than coil 1, say 25% more.
> 
> Now connect coil 1 & 2 in series so that if current were to flow
> clockwise through coil 1 it would be flowing counter clockwise through
> coil 2.
> 
> Now if you apply a current the magnetic field from coil 1 will
> predominate in the center, than much I know, so the steel will be
> magnetized by coil 1.
> 
> Now the magnetic field from coil 1 as it expands induces an EMF that
> opposes the current in this coil, this is of course inductance and on
> collapse will try and keep the current flowing.
> 
> But that magnetic field from coil 1 is also inducing an EMF in coil 2 in
> the reverse direction, and more strongly as it has more turns.
> 
> Obviously the magnetic field from coil 2 is also creating a somewhat
> weaker magnetic field that is inducing both it's self and coil 1.
> 
> Anyway as the magnetic field from coil 1 is considerably stronger than
> from coil 2 thanks to the steel core it's EMF is greater.
> 
> So now as we apply a current to the two coils we see the magnetic field
> and EMF from coil 1 predominates, yet the 25% more turns from coil 2
> should mean more voltage in induced in it from coil 1's magnetic field.
> This means if everything is done right it would seem we have NEGATIVE
> inductance.
> 
> I don't know if it will work out like that but the theory seems
> interesting.
> I did actually have an idea for another device that creates negative
> inductance, it was a bifilar coil negatively charged.
> I mentioned it in a Free Energy chat room and on Vortex, then an
> appropriate amount of time later the exact same idea with the same
> explanation was posted on the web:
> http://www.geocities.com/nayado/
> (I have no idea if it was just someone with the same idea or if he heard
> me talk about it)
> 
> It's just an idea I'm probably not going to try so I figure I'd put it
> out there for other people not to try too!
> 
> This idea might be interesting to Dough K and other magnet
> motor/generator people.
> Because if you used such a coil as a generator the magnetic field from
> the magnets would saturate and induce an EMF in coil 2 (that would be
> 75% canceled by coil 1 but never the less) but the magnetic field of
> coil 1 would be felt by the magnet, so it's anti lenz law, it's a motor
> too.
> 
> I have seem motor/generators that people claimed worked and they had
> such a setup.
> Even if in such a case you only had coil 1 have a few turns placed at
> the end of the core (closest to the magnet) it should still tip things
> in favor of over unity so I suggest that all those who make such motors
> try this it at least a little, it might make some difference and can't
> really hurt.
> 
> I also have another idea that I've verified does strange things if any
> of them want to contact me privately.
> 

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Fri Nov 16 15:46:05 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id PAA22629;
	Fri, 16 Nov 2001 15:42:09 -0800
Resent-Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 15:42:09 -0800
X-Authentication-Warning: smtp1.ihug.co.nz: Host p96-nas8.akl.ihug.co.nz [203.173.218.96] claimed to be ihug.co.nz
Message-ID: <3BF5A0C6.E9B24D1F ihug.co.nz>
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2001 12:27:02 +1300
From: John Berry <antigrav ihug.co.nz>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Re: Negative inductance
References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0111161630050.21093-100000 newton.csun.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Resent-Message-ID: <"OaLin2.0.VX5.HHQzx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45299
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: RO
X-Status: 

hank scudder wrote:

> John
>         Get an engineering or physics textbook, and lookup Mutual
> Inductance, and series connections of inductance.

They sure don't cover anything like that ;)

I think you need to reread what I said, if that's still your view then you
just don't get it.

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Fri Nov 16 16:59:08 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id QAA27430;
	Fri, 16 Nov 2001 16:56:36 -0800
Resent-Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 16:56:36 -0800
X-Authentication-Warning: eskimo.com: billb owned process doing -bs
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 16:56:32 -0800 (PST)
From: William Beaty <billb eskimo.com>
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
cc: jlnlabs yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: Negative inductance
In-Reply-To: <3BF58DE4.52C43763 ihug.co.nz>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.96.1011116165521.11134A-100000 eskimo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Resent-Message-ID: <"2GNGY2.0.Wi6.4NRzx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45300
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

On Sat, 17 Nov 2001, John Berry wrote:

> An old idea I'm not about to do anything with personally:
> 
> Take a long laminated steel core.
> 
> Wind a coil (coil 1) on the center of it.
> 
> Wind another coil over the first but with a spacer separating it by a
> few inches making the diameter of coil 2 much greater.
> Give coil 2 more turns than coil 1, say 25% more.

Ah, you mean the Cook patent from 1871!

:)

See:

  DF Cook's "electro-magnetic battery"
  http://my.voyager.net/~jrrandall/CookCoil.htm


((((((((((((((((((((( ( (  (   (    (O)    )   )  ) ) )))))))))))))))))))))
William J. Beaty                                  SCIENCE HOBBYIST website
billb eskimo.com                                  http://www.amasci.com
EE/programmer/sci-exhibits          science projects, tesla, weird science
Seattle, WA   206-789-0775          freenrg-L taoshum-L vortex-L webhead-L

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Fri Nov 16 17:40:36 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id RAA16135;
	Fri, 16 Nov 2001 17:37:58 -0800
Resent-Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 17:37:58 -0800
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 20:45:38 -0500 (EST)
From: John Schnurer <herman antioch-college.edu>
To: Vortex <vortex-l eskimo.com>
Subject: General ...Re: Negative inductance (fwd)
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1011116202721.29371H-100000 college.antioch-college.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Resent-Message-ID: <"EVnhy2.0.ux3.szRzx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45301
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 


Subject: Re: Negative inductance




	On the topic of Negative Inductance:

	This is one of my favorite-of-all-time aspects of

	THE
		Applied Sciences of Experimentalist Physics

	OK:
	If you examine an inductor electrically it has some attributes, or
how it behaves.  
	   A)	As a VERY loose and General description of these...

	1) an Inductor tends to impede the flow of AC ... or impedes
changes in an electric current and it exhibits no or low attenuation of
DC. 
	L is the symbol for inductance. 

	   B)	Resistor ...attenuates AC and DC and anything else with 
		the same  "Vigah" to use the words of the late or passed
			over President John Fitzgerald Kennedy

	R is the symbol of Resistance

	   C) 	Capacitor is Sort Of the opposite of L in its Loose and
			VERY
		  General  properties: 
		  it impedes DC... and AC passes  through with little or
			no Attenuation
		 
        C is the symbol for Capacitance

	NOW: .... I bring you with to where we are in the
		Electronic Signal Processing domain and we say L,R,C.

	We have these great tools we call Active electronic elements,
		including but not limited to: 

	Vacuum tubes
	Transistors
	Diodes

	And a BUNCH of other more specialized devices .... some employ
condensed matter, or solid state physics, some employ Plasma, some employ
OTHER methods .... diacs...magnetic amplifiers ... dielectric amplifiers
... and on and on....

	Well.....

	I can use these active elements and build circuits to do all kinds
of things.... and ONE of the things I can do is to manufacture Artificial
Electronic Elements or to abbreviate this, AEE.
	Some of these AEE may include, and are by NO means limited to
		...and only imagination is the limiting factor

	"Perfect" or ideal diodes with no forward voltage drop
	Amplifiers with NO offset
	Power Optical Transistors
		OR
	I can build circuits or devices which exhibit 
	Properties of Physics or Mathmatics ... such as
logarithm function amplifier or anti-log amp ...

		AND..... the part that started this:  

	When I was learning about some of he more out-of-the-way signal
processing stuff it struck me one day that... in the purely electronic
domain that .... 	I can build a capacitor!  Or an L R or C element
and such an element can be infinitely variable in its adjustability,
within, of course, the qualities, properties and Capabilities of the
Active and Passive circuit components used to make the artificial L R or
C.....
	AND..... the LRC can be positive OR negative !!!

						J
	POST SCRIPTS:	 

	It is possible to built Negative L or other system parts that do
all kinds of things .....

	As example:

	In some sensor tasks the cable which is often a coaxial cable,
which carries a signal from a remote transducer exhibits capacitance and
the capacitance reduces or attenuates the higher frequency components
of the signals of interest.

	By using an adjustable negative C or Negative Capacitance circuit
a designer
can actually "dial out" the effect of the capacitance of the cable.. and
you can see this right on the spot. 
	If you use a square wave signal source with an impedance about the
same as the actual transducer and watch the rounded corners of the trace
on an oscilloscope you can see the effect of the cable capacitance.
	You can then connect the negative C circuit and watch the image of
the time history of the square wave signal being attenuated and in real
time you can adjust the degree of Neg C until the square wave's corners
are nicely sharp again.

	This is really enjoyable to me to have seen it the first time,
almost as though a magic djinni fixed things up

						J


From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Fri Nov 16 17:43:42 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id RAA19091;
	Fri, 16 Nov 2001 17:43:12 -0800
Resent-Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 17:43:12 -0800
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 20:50:51 -0500 (EST)
From: John Schnurer <herman antioch-college.edu>
To: William Beaty <billb eskimo.com>
cc: vortex-l eskimo.com, jlnlabs@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: Negative inductance
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.96.1011116165521.11134A-100000 eskimo.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1011116204912.29371J-100000 college.antioch-college.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Resent-Message-ID: <"RPxuU1.0.8g4.l2Szx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45302
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: RO
X-Status: 



	Dear Bill,


	What is the Cook CIP thing that is supposed to be a propulsion?
	Is there a patent or patents for this?

	Please and Thank you...

On Fri, 16 Nov 2001, William Beaty wrote:

> On Sat, 17 Nov 2001, John Berry wrote:
> 
> > An old idea I'm not about to do anything with personally:
> > 
> > Take a long laminated steel core.
> > 
> > Wind a coil (coil 1) on the center of it.
> > 
> > Wind another coil over the first but with a spacer separating it by a
> > few inches making the diameter of coil 2 much greater.
> > Give coil 2 more turns than coil 1, say 25% more.
> 
> Ah, you mean the Cook patent from 1871!
> 
> :)
> 
> See:
> 
>   DF Cook's "electro-magnetic battery"
>   http://my.voyager.net/~jrrandall/CookCoil.htm
> 
> 
> ((((((((((((((((((((( ( (  (   (    (O)    )   )  ) ) )))))))))))))))))))))
> William J. Beaty                                  SCIENCE HOBBYIST website
> billb eskimo.com                                  http://www.amasci.com
> EE/programmer/sci-exhibits          science projects, tesla, weird science
> Seattle, WA   206-789-0775          freenrg-L taoshum-L vortex-L webhead-L
> 

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Fri Nov 16 18:14:04 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id SAA30157;
	Fri, 16 Nov 2001 18:09:21 -0800
Resent-Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 18:09:21 -0800
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 21:16:59 -0500 (EST)
From: John Schnurer <herman antioch-college.edu>
To: Vortex <vortex-l eskimo.com>
Subject: Need Vendor  reconditioned lab equipment Dewar Cryogenic Please
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1011116211037.29371L-100000 college.antioch-college.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Resent-Message-ID: <"UgITY.0.7N7.GRSzx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45303
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

NEED SOURCE FOR DEWAR FLASK


	Dear Vo.,

	Looking for a dewar 10 to 25 liters for storage and transport..


	Thanks....

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Fri Nov 16 18:25:59 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id SAA05632;
	Fri, 16 Nov 2001 18:25:17 -0800
Resent-Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 18:25:17 -0800
Message-ID: <3BF5CA62.D8FD88BA ix.netcom.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 18:24:34 -0800
From: Akira Kawasaki <aki ix.netcom.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en]C-CCK-MCD NSCPCD472  (Win95; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Vortex <vortex-l eskimo.com>
Subject: [Fwd: What's New for Nov 16, 2001]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Resent-Message-ID: <"M3aP5.0.sN1.DgSzx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45304
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: RO
X-Status: 



-------- Original Message --------
Subject: What's New for Nov 16, 2001
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 17:07:25 -0500 (EST)
From: "What's New" <whatsnew aps.org>
To: aki ix.netcom.com

WHAT'S NEW   Robert L. Park   Friday, 16 Nov 01   Washington, DC

1. SEPTEMBER 11: THE SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING SCHOLARSHIP FUND. 
More than 30 organizations within the science and engineering
communities have jointly established a fund to support science
and engineering education of the families of victims of the
September 11 attack.   The fund will be administered by the
Citizens Scholarship Foundation of America, and is part of the
Families of Freedom Scholarship Fund chaired jointly by former
President Bill Clinton and former Senate Majority Leader Bob
Dole. For more information see: www.aps.org/sciencefund.html 

2. BIOTERRORISM: ALTERNATIVE RESPONSES TO EXPOSURE.  The chair of
the House Government Reform Committee, Dan Burton (R-IN), held a
hearing Wednesday on how to respond to bio-terrorist attacks. 
Burton can't understand why we don't just treat this stuff with
alternative medicine (WN 19 Oct 01).  For Burton, this is nothing
new; in a 1999 hearing on Alternative Medicine his lead witness
was Jane Seymour, who played Dr. Quinn, Medicine Woman on TV (WN
12 Feb 99).  This time, however, Stephen Straus, director of the
National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine was
testifying, and it wasn't what Burton wanted to hear.  Straus
questioned "whether the measures that some are promoting do
anything more than prey upon people's fears and distract them
from taking more prudent steps to protect themselves...It may not
even be prudent to combine such natural products with antibiotics
because of the possibility that they would interfere with proper
action of the drugs."  Perhaps fearing a backlash, many in the 
alternative medicine industry have issued unprecedented warnings
to the public not to use their products to treat or cure anthrax.

3. NASA: THE GOLDIN AGE FINALLY COMES TO AN END.  Sean O'Keefe,
deputy director of the Office of Management and Budget, and a
financial expert, has been nominated to replace Dan Goldin as
NASA Administrator (WN 19 Oct 01).  O'Keefe's main assignment
will be to establish budgetary discipline in the troubled agency. 
About half of NASA's budget goes to programs involving humans in
space, and of course that's where the trouble lies.  With the
space station crew down to a Mir-sized three, far short of
taxpayer expectations, NASA is bracing for a deep culture shock. 
The budget just passed diverts money from human space flight to
Goddard Space Flight Center in Maryland, Rep. Weldon of Florida 
complained.  Good heavens, they might even do some science.

4. THE SUMMIT: NO AGREEMENT WAS REACHED ON MISSILE DEFENSE.  This
is not bad.  For the time being, the United States will continue
to abide by the 1972 ABM treaty.  It's not like we had an ABM
system to install in any case, but the U.S. will continue
searching for the sorcerer's stone, and could withdraw later.  In
the meantime, both sides will reduce their nuclear arsenals. 

THE AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY and THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND. 
Opinions are the author's and are not necessarily shared by the
American Physical Society or the University, but they should be.

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Fri Nov 16 18:36:09 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id SAA07757;
	Fri, 16 Nov 2001 18:28:31 -0800
Resent-Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 18:28:31 -0800
Message-ID: <025701c16f0f$8abbf190$6401a8c0 cs910664a>
From: "Colin Quinney" <crquin home.com>
To: <vortex-l eskimo.com>
References: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1011116202721.29371H-100000 college.antioch-college.edu>
Subject: Re: General ...Re: Negative inductance (fwd)
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 21:28:27 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700
Resent-Message-ID: <"_bSYn.0.7v1.FjSzx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45305
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

John,

Can you change the delay? Not lengthen, but shorten it?

Colin


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John Schnurer" <herman antioch-college.edu>
To: "Vortex" <vortex-l eskimo.com>
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 8:45 PM
Subject: General ...Re: Negative inductance (fwd)


> 
> Subject: Re: Negative inductance
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On the topic of Negative Inductance:
> 
> This is one of my favorite-of-all-time aspects of
> 
> THE
> Applied Sciences of Experimentalist Physics
> 
> OK:
> If you examine an inductor electrically it has some attributes, or
> how it behaves.  
>    A) As a VERY loose and General description of these...
> 
> 1) an Inductor tends to impede the flow of AC ... or impedes
> changes in an electric current and it exhibits no or low attenuation of
> DC. 
> L is the symbol for inductance. 
> 
>    B) Resistor ...attenuates AC and DC and anything else with 
> the same  "Vigah" to use the words of the late or passed
> over President John Fitzgerald Kennedy
> 
> R is the symbol of Resistance
> 
>    C) Capacitor is Sort Of the opposite of L in its Loose and
> VERY
>   General  properties: 
>   it impedes DC... and AC passes  through with little or
> no Attenuation
> 
>         C is the symbol for Capacitance
> 
> NOW: .... I bring you with to where we are in the
> Electronic Signal Processing domain and we say L,R,C.
> 
> We have these great tools we call Active electronic elements,
> including but not limited to: 
> 
> Vacuum tubes
> Transistors
> Diodes
> 
> And a BUNCH of other more specialized devices .... some employ
> condensed matter, or solid state physics, some employ Plasma, some employ
> OTHER methods .... diacs...magnetic amplifiers ... dielectric amplifiers
> ... and on and on....
> 
> Well.....
> 
> I can use these active elements and build circuits to do all kinds
> of things.... and ONE of the things I can do is to manufacture Artificial
> Electronic Elements or to abbreviate this, AEE.
> Some of these AEE may include, and are by NO means limited to
> ...and only imagination is the limiting factor
> 
> "Perfect" or ideal diodes with no forward voltage drop
> Amplifiers with NO offset
> Power Optical Transistors
> OR
> I can build circuits or devices which exhibit 
> Properties of Physics or Mathmatics ... such as
> logarithm function amplifier or anti-log amp ...
> 
> AND..... the part that started this:  
> 
> When I was learning about some of he more out-of-the-way signal
> processing stuff it struck me one day that... in the purely electronic
> domain that .... I can build a capacitor!  Or an L R or C element
> and such an element can be infinitely variable in its adjustability,
> within, of course, the qualities, properties and Capabilities of the
> Active and Passive circuit components used to make the artificial L R or
> C.....
> AND..... the LRC can be positive OR negative !!!
> 
> J
> POST SCRIPTS: 
> 
> It is possible to built Negative L or other system parts that do
> all kinds of things .....
> 
> As example:
> 
> In some sensor tasks the cable which is often a coaxial cable,
> which carries a signal from a remote transducer exhibits capacitance and
> the capacitance reduces or attenuates the higher frequency components
> of the signals of interest.
> 
> By using an adjustable negative C or Negative Capacitance circuit
> a designer
> can actually "dial out" the effect of the capacitance of the cable.. and
> you can see this right on the spot. 
> If you use a square wave signal source with an impedance about the
> same as the actual transducer and watch the rounded corners of the trace
> on an oscilloscope you can see the effect of the cable capacitance.
> You can then connect the negative C circuit and watch the image of
> the time history of the square wave signal being attenuated and in real
> time you can adjust the degree of Neg C until the square wave's corners
> are nicely sharp again.
> 
> This is really enjoyable to me to have seen it the first time,
> almost as though a magic djinni fixed things up
> 
> J
> 
> 


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.295 / Virus Database: 159 - Release Date: 11/1/2001

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Sat Nov 17 00:23:38 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id AAA18547;
	Sat, 17 Nov 2001 00:20:59 -0800
Resent-Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2001 00:20:59 -0800
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <a0510030fb81bac4c2332 [209.23.136.39]>
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20011116113828.00ab4370 pop.mindspring.com>
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20011116113828.00ab4370 pop.mindspring.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2001 02:20:58 -0600
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
From: thomas malloy <temalloy metro.lakes.com>
Subject: Re: Science & learning as liberation Jihad
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
Resent-Message-ID: <"ShtM_1.0.jX4.htXzx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45306
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

>attitudes -- that might eventually stagnate or be forgotten. A 
>hundred generations from now, we assume people will still know as 
>much as we do, plus a great deal more, and they will still allow 
>free enquiry.

I don't have the slightest doubt that independent inventors will 
continue to move technology ahead reguardless of what the scientific 
establishment does.

>
>When the Egyptian Pharaohs ruled, there was a large ministry assigned to a

That kind of ossified thinking is present today in the major 
universities were the dullest of the Ph D's are given teaching 
positions. I have great confidence that when an inventor (s) come 
forward with machines that work by utilizing quantum vacuum 
fluxiations that the scientific establishment will suddenly by put on 
notice and then theory will catch up with practice.

>strong and so beneficial that it is immune to stagnation and decay. 
>Julian Schwinger was not exaggerating or being an alarmist when he 
>said the oppression of cold fusion "will be the death of science."
>
>Schwinger understood, as Bacon did, that people can be barbaric, 
>great ideas can be lost, civilizations can go dreadfully astray for 
>generations. Science

IMHO, the dark ages were more the fault of the power that was running 
the world, the Roman Church.

>Muslim nations once led the world in natural science and 
>mathematics. We hope they will once again reclaim their traditions.

I find the collapse of the Classical Muslim civilization very 
interesting. PBS did an interesting show on the Wahabi sect of Islam. 
These are the hard nut fundamentalists who have been causing all the 
trouble by supporting mosques that indroctrenate young men in the 
radical fundamentalist variety of Islam that has caused all the 
problems.

>I hope that we do not allow our own version of the Taliban, the 
>publishers and the APS, to strangle these traditions in the 
>meanwhile.
>
>- Jed
I was just thinking about Robert Parks quote, "I don't care about 
your isotopic ratios," when he didn't like the conclusions of some 
researchers.



-- 

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Sat Nov 17 11:42:29 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id LAA12330;
	Sat, 17 Nov 2001 11:39:48 -0800
Resent-Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2001 11:39:48 -0800
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20011117140947.02e01228 pop.mindspring.com>
X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2001 14:12:22 -0500
To: vortex-l eskimo.com, vortex-l@eskimo.com
From: Jed Rothwell <jedrothwell infinite-energy.com>
Subject: Re: Science & learning as liberation Jihad
In-Reply-To: <a0510030fb81bac4c2332 [209.23.136.39]>
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20011116113828.00ab4370 pop.mindspring.com>
 <5.1.0.14.2.20011116113828.00ab4370 pop.mindspring.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Resent-Message-ID: <"owWef3.0.a03.3qhzx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45307
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

thomas malloy wrote:

>I was just thinking about Robert Parks quote, "I don't care about your 
>isotopic ratios," when he didn't like the conclusions of some researchers.

His name is Robert Park. I do not know why people keep mistaking it as 
"Parks." His column "What's New" is often published here by Akira Kawasaki. 
(Some people call it "What's New That I Hate.")

When did he say "I don't care about your isotopic ratios"? It sounds typical.

- Jed

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Sat Nov 17 13:19:03 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id NAA21067;
	Sat, 17 Nov 2001 13:14:01 -0800
Resent-Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2001 13:14:01 -0800
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2001 16:21:38 -0500 (EST)
From: John Schnurer <herman antioch-college.edu>
To: Colin Quinney <crquin home.com>
cc: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Re: General ...Re: Negative inductance :: Cable Delay
In-Reply-To: <025701c16f0f$8abbf190$6401a8c0 cs910664a>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1011117161037.20665H-100000 college.antioch-college.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Resent-Message-ID: <"zICwz1.0.095.OCjzx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45308
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 



	DEAR Colin,

	I am not sure what delay you are speaking of but if you mean the
signal delay resulting from the capacitance of a coaxial cable... ye, this
can be shortened.

	If there is some other delay issue ..... bring it on, and let me
see if I know anything about it or have worked with it.

	The realm of signals, processing, noise and their alteration has
occupied my for 20 years and for over a decade I fielded issues in this
domain for USAF and NASA-USAF cooperations.
	It is always a joy and interesting in its challenge.



	I have worked with several methods to arrive at cable methods
which allow more rapid information transmission.  

	This is not a one single method.  The methods may include but are
not limited to changing the nature of, modifying or other alteration[s]:

	a]	method of transmission
	b]	method of reception
	c]	  change properties of cable
	d]	  change method of making cable
	e]	processing the cable itself
	f]	  combinations of the above
	g]	other not well known methods
	h]	other proprietary methods.


	Anyone interested in this commercially contact off line, please.


				J
	


On Fri, 16 Nov 2001, Colin Quinney wrote:

> John,
> 
> Can you change the delay? Not lengthen, but shorten it?
> 
> Colin
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "John Schnurer" <herman antioch-college.edu>
> To: "Vortex" <vortex-l eskimo.com>
> Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 8:45 PM
> Subject: General ...Re: Negative inductance (fwd)
> 
> 
> > 
> > Subject: Re: Negative inductance
> > 
> > On the topic of Negative Inductance:
> > 
> > This is one of my favorite-of-all-time aspects of
> > 
> > THE
> > Applied Sciences of Experimentalist Physics
> > 
> > OK:
> > If you examine an inductor electrically it has some attributes, or
> > how it behaves.  

> >    A) As a VERY loose and General description of these...
> > 
> > 1) an Inductor tends to impede the flow of AC ... or impedes
> > changes in an electric current and it exhibits no or low attenuation of
> > DC. 
> > L is the symbol for inductance. 
> > 
> >    B) Resistor ...attenuates AC and DC and anything else with 
> > the same  "Vigah" to use the words of the late or passed
> > over President John Fitzgerald Kennedy
> > 
> > R is the symbol of Resistance
> > 
> >    C) Capacitor is Sort Of the opposite of L in its Loose and
> > VERY
> >   General  properties: 
> >   it impedes DC... and AC passes  through with little or
> > no Attenuation
> > 
> >         C is the symbol for Capacitance
> > 
> > NOW: .... I bring you with to where we are in the
> > Electronic Signal Processing domain and we say L,R,C.
> > 
> > We have these great tools we call Active electronic elements,
> > including but not limited to: 
> > 
> > Vacuum tubes
> > Transistors
> > Diodes
> > 
> > And a BUNCH of other more specialized devices .... some employ
> > condensed matter, or solid state physics, some employ Plasma, some employ
> > OTHER methods .... diacs...magnetic amplifiers ... dielectric amplifiers
> > ... and on and on....
> > 
> > Well.....
> > 
> > I can use these active elements and build circuits to do all kinds
> > of things.... and ONE of the things I can do is to manufacture Artificial
> > Electronic Elements or to abbreviate this, AEE.
> > Some of these AEE may include, and are by NO means limited to
> > ...and only imagination is the limiting factor
> > 
> > "Perfect" or ideal diodes with no forward voltage drop
> > Amplifiers with NO offset
> > Power Optical Transistors
> > OR
> > I can build circuits or devices which exhibit 
> > Properties of Physics or Mathmatics ... such as
> > logarithm function amplifier or anti-log amp ...
> > 
> > AND..... the part that started this:  
> > 
> > When I was learning about some of he more out-of-the-way signal
> > processing stuff it struck me one day that... in the purely electronic
> > domain that .... I can build a capacitor!  Or an L R or C element
> > and such an element can be infinitely variable in its adjustability,
> > within, of course, the qualities, properties and Capabilities of the
> > Active and Passive circuit components used to make the artificial L R or
> > C.....
> > AND..... the LRC can be positive OR negative !!!
> > 
> > J
> > POST SCRIPTS: 
> > 
> > It is possible to built Negative L or other system parts that do
> > all kinds of things .....
> > 
> > As example:
> > 
> > In some sensor tasks the cable which is often a coaxial cable,
> > which carries a signal from a remote transducer exhibits capacitance and
> > the capacitance reduces or attenuates the higher frequency components
> > of the signals of interest.
> > 
> > By using an adjustable negative C or Negative Capacitance circuit
> > a designer
> > can actually "dial out" the effect of the capacitance of the cable.. and
> > you can see this right on the spot. 

> > If you use a square wave signal source with an impedance about the
> > same as the actual transducer and watch the rounded corners of the trace
> > on an oscilloscope you can see the effect of the cable capacitance.
> > You can then connect the negative C circuit and watch the image of
> > the time history of the square wave signal being attenuated and in real
> > time you can adjust the degree of Neg C until the square wave's corners
> > are nicely sharp again.
> > 
> > This is really enjoyable to me to have seen it the first time,
> > almost as though a magic djinni fixed things up
> > 
> > J
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> ---
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.295 / Virus Database: 159 - Release Date: 11/1/2001
> 

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Sat Nov 17 14:49:00 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id OAA22839;
	Sat, 17 Nov 2001 14:45:58 -0800
Resent-Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2001 14:45:58 -0800
X-Authentication-Warning: eskimo.com: billb owned process doing -bs
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2001 14:45:56 -0800 (PST)
From: William Beaty <billb eskimo.com>
To: vortexC-L eskimo.com
Subject: English: Grebennikov's insect-structure Torsion article
In-Reply-To: <003c01c1607f$856fe320$541552c3 sah>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.96.1011117142723.8973B-100000 eskimo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Resent-Message-ID: <"MGQaq1.0.Wa5.bYkzx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45309
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 


Slavek Krepelka posted an English translation of the Russian-language
chapter 5 of Grebennikov's book about insect-microstructure torsion
experiments.  I merged this back into the original diagrams on the website
of Ju. N.  Cherednichenko.  Take a look at: 

   THE NATURAL PHENOMENA OF ANTI GRAVITATION AND INVISIBILITY IN INSECTS
   AND THE GREBENNIKOV CAVITY STRUCTURES EFFECT  (ENGLISH)
   http://www.amasci.com/greb/greb2.html

Note well the diagram of a simple motor w/angled spools of 35mm film, and
the part about parasitic wasp larvae which use an "inertial drive" effect! 
I wonder if the dizziness caused by my "brain sucker" device is NOT
acoustic after all (http://amasci.com/freenrg/audhole.html)  I wonder if
Mexican Jumping Beans available in the SW of the USA are using pulsed
antigravity?!!!  I remember that they *do not* give strong impulses to
your hand when they jump, yet they can jump significant distances.


Congratulations to Mr. Krepalka!  He spent $600 for translating, and
as he notes at the end of the article, donations can be sent to Jerry
Decker, jdecker keelynet.com

Also:  V.Grebennikov passed away this year.

Also:  babelfish.altavista.com now has a crude Russian/English
translation. (It does not like Grebennikov's single-hyphen pauses, but
doubled hyphens or hyphenated words are OK.)


The English text
http://www3.sympatico.ca/slavek.krepelka/greb.html

Original page
Ju. N. Cherednichenko
http://www.sinor.ru/~che/
che online.sinor.ru
http://www.sinor.ru/~che/grebennikov.htm


((((((((((((((((((((( ( (  (   (    (O)    )   )  ) ) )))))))))))))))))))))
William J. Beaty                                  SCIENCE HOBBYIST website
billb eskimo.com                                  http://www.amasci.com
EE/programmer/sci-exhibits          science projects, tesla, weird science
Seattle, WA   206-789-0775          freenrg-L taoshum-L vortex-L webhead-L

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Sat Nov 17 15:54:57 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id PAA15213;
	Sat, 17 Nov 2001 15:51:07 -0800
Resent-Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2001 15:51:07 -0800
Reply-To: <knagel gis.net>
From: "Keith Nagel" <knagel gis.net>
To: <vortex-l eskimo.com>
Subject: RE: English: Grebennikov's insect-structure Torsion article
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2001 19:00:02 -0500
Message-ID: <NDBBLHBMKKFMAIAFAAKMEEEEDAAA.knagel gis.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.96.1011117142723.8973B-100000 eskimo.com>
Importance: Normal
Resent-Message-ID: <"fsUPW1.0.dj3.hVlzx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45310
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: RO
X-Status: 

Hi Bill.

Interesting stuff, I always wondered about the site and
the pictures. 

The part about being invisible reminded me of that superhero who had
the power of invisibility but it only worked when you
didn't look at him.

Below, the author seems to be mistaking pellet gun holes
in windows for some kind of exotic effect? Unless,
by god, someone's been operating such a device RIGHT
IN MY BACKYARD!

 It turns out that these holes resemble simmilar holes
 in windows plate glass. The latter sometimes appear in
 residential and office buildings, occasionally in "bursts"
 in the windows of several rooms and floors. A hole is 3-5 mm
 on the outside, widening in a cone to he inside, with exit
 diameter of 6-15 mm. Some holes are melted or colored brown
 on edges, just as it happened in the case of my insect
 in my test tube. It seems that this type of poltergeist
 isn't caused, as I used to believe, by short-lived
 microplasmoids of tiny ball lightning type,
 but by particles and specks carelessly dropped
 while testing a device similar to mine. 


-----Original Message-----
From: William Beaty [mailto:billb eskimo.com]
Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2001 5:46 PM
To: vortexC-L eskimo.com
Subject: English: Grebennikov's insect-structure Torsion article



Slavek Krepelka posted an English translation of the Russian-language
chapter 5 of Grebennikov's book about insect-microstructure torsion
experiments.  I merged this back into the original diagrams on the website
of Ju. N.  Cherednichenko.  Take a look at: 

   THE NATURAL PHENOMENA OF ANTI GRAVITATION AND INVISIBILITY IN INSECTS
   AND THE GREBENNIKOV CAVITY STRUCTURES EFFECT  (ENGLISH)
   http://www.amasci.com/greb/greb2.html

Note well the diagram of a simple motor w/angled spools of 35mm film, and
the part about parasitic wasp larvae which use an "inertial drive" effect! 
I wonder if the dizziness caused by my "brain sucker" device is NOT
acoustic after all (http://amasci.com/freenrg/audhole.html)  I wonder if
Mexican Jumping Beans available in the SW of the USA are using pulsed
antigravity?!!!  I remember that they *do not* give strong impulses to
your hand when they jump, yet they can jump significant distances.


Congratulations to Mr. Krepalka!  He spent $600 for translating, and
as he notes at the end of the article, donations can be sent to Jerry
Decker, jdecker keelynet.com

Also:  V.Grebennikov passed away this year.

Also:  babelfish.altavista.com now has a crude Russian/English
translation. (It does not like Grebennikov's single-hyphen pauses, but
doubled hyphens or hyphenated words are OK.)


The English text
http://www3.sympatico.ca/slavek.krepelka/greb.html

Original page
Ju. N. Cherednichenko
http://www.sinor.ru/~che/
che online.sinor.ru
http://www.sinor.ru/~che/grebennikov.htm


((((((((((((((((((((( ( (  (   (    (O)    )   )  ) ) )))))))))))))))))))))
William J. Beaty                                  SCIENCE HOBBYIST website
billb eskimo.com                                  http://www.amasci.com
EE/programmer/sci-exhibits          science projects, tesla, weird science
Seattle, WA   206-789-0775          freenrg-L taoshum-L vortex-L webhead-L


From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Sat Nov 17 18:04:35 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id SAA28845;
	Sat, 17 Nov 2001 18:03:38 -0800
Resent-Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2001 18:03:38 -0800
Message-ID: <014f01c16fd5$392aada0$6401a8c0 cs910664a>
From: "Colin Quinney" <crquin home.com>
To: <vortex-l eskimo.com>
References: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1011117161037.20665H-100000 college.antioch-college.edu>
Subject: Re: General ...Re: Negative inductance :: Cable Delay
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2001 21:03:31 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700
Resent-Message-ID: <"wvSPO3.0.W27.vRnzx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45311
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: RO
X-Status: 

J,

I was thinking of digital cable, used in digital cable television studios.
The square wave pulses would roll off after travelling only a few dozens of
feet. The expense of then reprocessing the signal through literally hundreds
of miles of digital cable, and the digital delays that this introduced,
caused extreme expense in a network TV broadcasting center. Digital TV is
the future of broadcasting, so if you know how to cut those costs..

Colin

----- Original Message -----
From: "John Schnurer" <herman antioch-college.edu>
To: "Colin Quinney" <crquin home.com>
Cc: <vortex-l eskimo.com>
Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2001 4:21 PM
Subject: Re: General ...Re: Negative inductance :: Cable Delay


>
>
> DEAR Colin,
>
> I am not sure what delay you are speaking of but if you mean the
> signal delay resulting from the capacitance of a coaxial cable... ye, this
> can be shortened.
>
> If there is some other delay issue ..... bring it on, and let me
> see if I know anything about it or have worked with it.
>
> The realm of signals, processing, noise and their alteration has
> occupied my for 20 years and for over a decade I fielded issues in this
> domain for USAF and NASA-USAF cooperations.
> It is always a joy and interesting in its challenge.
>
>
>
> I have worked with several methods to arrive at cable methods
> which allow more rapid information transmission.
>
> This is not a one single method.  The methods may include but are
> not limited to changing the nature of, modifying or other alteration[s]:
>
> a] method of transmission
> b] method of reception
> c]   change properties of cable
> d]   change method of making cable
> e] processing the cable itself
> f]   combinations of the above
> g] other not well known methods
> h] other proprietary methods.
>
>
> Anyone interested in this commercially contact off line, please.
>
>
> J
>
>
>
> On Fri, 16 Nov 2001, Colin Quinney wrote:
>
> > John,
> >
> > Can you change the delay? Not lengthen, but shorten it?
> >
> > Colin
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "John Schnurer" <herman antioch-college.edu>
> > To: "Vortex" <vortex-l eskimo.com>
> > Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 8:45 PM
> > Subject: General ...Re: Negative inductance (fwd)
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Subject: Re: Negative inductance
> > >
> > > On the topic of Negative Inductance:
> > >
> > > This is one of my favorite-of-all-time aspects of
> > >
> > > THE
> > > Applied Sciences of Experimentalist Physics
> > >
> > > OK:
> > > If you examine an inductor electrically it has some attributes, or
> > > how it behaves.
>
> > >    A) As a VERY loose and General description of these...
> > >
> > > 1) an Inductor tends to impede the flow of AC ... or impedes
> > > changes in an electric current and it exhibits no or low attenuation
of
> > > DC.
> > > L is the symbol for inductance.
> > >
> > >    B) Resistor ...attenuates AC and DC and anything else with
> > > the same  "Vigah" to use the words of the late or passed
> > > over President John Fitzgerald Kennedy
> > >
> > > R is the symbol of Resistance
> > >
> > >    C) Capacitor is Sort Of the opposite of L in its Loose and
> > > VERY
> > >   General  properties:
> > >   it impedes DC... and AC passes  through with little or
> > > no Attenuation
> > >
> > >         C is the symbol for Capacitance
> > >
> > > NOW: .... I bring you with to where we are in the
> > > Electronic Signal Processing domain and we say L,R,C.
> > >
> > > We have these great tools we call Active electronic elements,
> > > including but not limited to:
> > >
> > > Vacuum tubes
> > > Transistors
> > > Diodes
> > >
> > > And a BUNCH of other more specialized devices .... some employ
> > > condensed matter, or solid state physics, some employ Plasma, some
employ
> > > OTHER methods .... diacs...magnetic amplifiers ... dielectric
amplifiers
> > > ... and on and on....
> > >
> > > Well.....
> > >
> > > I can use these active elements and build circuits to do all kinds
> > > of things.... and ONE of the things I can do is to manufacture
Artificial
> > > Electronic Elements or to abbreviate this, AEE.
> > > Some of these AEE may include, and are by NO means limited to
> > > ...and only imagination is the limiting factor
> > >
> > > "Perfect" or ideal diodes with no forward voltage drop
> > > Amplifiers with NO offset
> > > Power Optical Transistors
> > > OR
> > > I can build circuits or devices which exhibit
> > > Properties of Physics or Mathmatics ... such as
> > > logarithm function amplifier or anti-log amp ...
> > >
> > > AND..... the part that started this:
> > >
> > > When I was learning about some of he more out-of-the-way signal
> > > processing stuff it struck me one day that... in the purely electronic
> > > domain that .... I can build a capacitor!  Or an L R or C element
> > > and such an element can be infinitely variable in its adjustability,
> > > within, of course, the qualities, properties and Capabilities of the
> > > Active and Passive circuit components used to make the artificial L R
or
> > > C.....
> > > AND..... the LRC can be positive OR negative !!!
> > >
> > > J
> > > POST SCRIPTS:
> > >
> > > It is possible to built Negative L or other system parts that do
> > > all kinds of things .....
> > >
> > > As example:
> > >
> > > In some sensor tasks the cable which is often a coaxial cable,
> > > which carries a signal from a remote transducer exhibits capacitance
and
> > > the capacitance reduces or attenuates the higher frequency components
> > > of the signals of interest.
> > >
> > > By using an adjustable negative C or Negative Capacitance circuit
> > > a designer
> > > can actually "dial out" the effect of the capacitance of the cable..
and
> > > you can see this right on the spot.
>
> > > If you use a square wave signal source with an impedance about the
> > > same as the actual transducer and watch the rounded corners of the
trace
> > > on an oscilloscope you can see the effect of the cable capacitance.
> > > You can then connect the negative C circuit and watch the image of
> > > the time history of the square wave signal being attenuated and in
real
> > > time you can adjust the degree of Neg C until the square wave's
corners
> > > are nicely sharp again.
> > >
> > > This is really enjoyable to me to have seen it the first time,
> > > almost as though a magic djinni fixed things up
> > >
> > > J
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > ---
> > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> > Version: 6.0.295 / Virus Database: 159 - Release Date: 11/1/2001
> >
>


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.295 / Virus Database: 159 - Release Date: 11/1/2001

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Sun Nov 18 03:07:38 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id DAA05525;
	Sun, 18 Nov 2001 03:04:52 -0800
Resent-Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2001 03:04:52 -0800
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <a05100300b81d0351ea34 [209.23.136.39]>
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20011117140947.02e01228 pop.mindspring.com>
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20011116113828.00ab4370 pop.mindspring.com>
 <5.1.0.14.2.20011116113828.00ab4370 pop.mindspring.com>
 <5.1.0.14.2.20011117140947.02e01228 pop.mindspring.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2001 05:05:28 -0600
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
From: thomas malloy <temalloy metro.lakes.com>
Subject: Re: Science & learning as liberation Jihad
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
Resent-Message-ID: <"NmqrR.0.BM1.KNvzx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45312
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: RO
X-Status: 

>thomas malloy wrote:
>
>>I was just thinking about Robert Parks quote, "I don't care about 
>>your isotopic ratios," when he didn't like the conclusions of some 
>>researchers.
>
>His name is Robert Park. I do not know why people keep mistaking it 
>as "Parks." His column "What's New" is often published here by Akira 
>Kawasaki. (Some people call it "What's New That I Hate.")
>
>When did he say "I don't care about your isotopic ratios"? It sounds typical.
>
>- Jed
Hum, I like the name Parks, it's a subtle form of disrespect to 
deliberately mispronounce someone's name, and I feel quite 
disrespectful towards Park. Someone was presenting a percentage of 
various isotopes as proof of a LENR which Parks doesn't want to 
acknowledge is happening. Screw him, maybe another tree will fall on 
him. OTOH, The hiring of relative dullards to teach physics is a lot 
more insidious. Oh well, technology will advance, and the truth will 
out!

On wards brothers! the quest continues.

-- 

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Sun Nov 18 09:54:47 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id JAA05898;
	Sun, 18 Nov 2001 09:51:02 -0800
Resent-Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2001 09:51:02 -0800
Message-ID: <3BF7F488.9F2626C0 verisoft.com.tr>
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2001 19:48:56 +0200
From: hamdi ucar <hamdix verisoft.com.tr>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: en-US
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: vortex <vortex-l eskimo.com>
Subject: Off topic ? - ultimate virtual empire
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Resent-Message-ID: <"IY4zH2.0.3S1.5K_zx" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45313
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 


Human history is about constituting order over communities. This is somehow required because humankind has no natural order except family relation. There are several ways to constitute ordering (keep in order) system. You can keep order by force. Then wri

te laws and rules to apply. This is monarchy, then after you can write laws that giving right to write laws to community which are under order that laws. For short it is democracy.

But if don't have any force initially to keep the order, still you can write laws an describe and ordering system but there would be no reason that a community leave their current ordering system and switch to new one.

But there is a way. The belief. Humankind is used to be to believe to supernatural entities.  If you convince them you are the agent of the ultimate supernatural entity, the Ultra Supreme Being (USB), and constitute a philosophy reflecting universal order

 of USB, there is a way people believe to you and choose your philosophy.

A quick way to constitute such a philosophy and keep the things simple is to centralize everything around USB. As the philosophy is centralized, the ordering system could be also centralized. USB is the ultimate power. He is capable to do everything, crea

te and annihilate. Everything is belonging to him. USB is not responsible for anything but everything and everybody is responsible to USB. Power of USB is limited in time and space.  Actually this is a philosophy of ultimate virtual empire. USB is also un

ique it is EXCLUSIVE. No other virtual empire could be. All claimed ones are false. No other empire can deal with USB Empire.

Centralization in all means, centralization of power, uniqueness and exclusivity is the core of philosophy. This look like the equivalence principle of General Relativity. The theory is build by this simple principle. A spiritual theory like this can be b

uild similarly.

Once the core of the philosophy is constituted, remaining is explaining the World by this philosophy, similar to a physics theory. This is, sometime easy, straightforward, sometime difficulties be encountered. Such difficulties can be overcome by introduc

ing some other spiritual beings, good and bad, just as some physics theories does. When they stuck somewhere, they introduce new forces, new dimensions and new virtual particles. Of course, one should be very wise to keep the theory in harmony and not int

roducing to much patches. These spiritual entities are acting individuals trough its mind or to their souls. Soul is very important concept, already recognized most of cultures, and mixing real things with hypothetical entities help to blur the conception

 of the reality. So such a complication help to introductions of belief systems to communities.

Still there remain several difficulties which not be overcome by any logic. For example if everything is strictly under order of USB, how it appears almost everything out of order? Now the real power of the philosophy enters the scene. If native logic is 

not able solve the problem, change the logic. So illogical become logical. Remove the cause-effect relation. Introduce infinities (i.e. "renormalization" in physics), or state that we should not ask. After all we are very limited comprehension capabilitie

s beings that USB created by causes which our philosophy will invent it further. Even we don't need to understand things, as everything is well arranged by USB (this remind me MS). Most important, we are not FREE beings to our own. We are belonging to USB

. We should obey rules of USB when reasoning. 

Now our mind is tied by this philosophy and by such logic. No way to break it. Our way of thinking is replaced by a program, we are owned (as hacker saying). Our perception of reality is changed. We still think everything is logical in the when we look fr

om the frame of this philosophy.

The purpose of the science is not understanding things but to proof that we can not understand them. Why? Because wisdom of USB is not subject to understanding. We should not try to do things USB does.

Second step is constituting the rules. These rules could be direct orders of USB (coming via special channel to the agent) or we do try reflecting USB orders. On making the rules we use our altered logic.

These rules are about ethics, moral, preying, reconditioning our mind, refreshing it with the philosophy often to prevent the possibility of our native mind and logic come back and what we should do in real life and what we should not.

Now everything is ready to make the virtual empire real. Only we need virtual punishing and rewarding mechanism to force people follow orders. This is hell and heaven. So everything is done in human mind, in theory, no exterior law enforcement is needed. 

But in practice these law enforcements are necessity. So we organize and build instruments to do it. 

The acceptance step of the philosophy by people have nothing special.Standard practice including promises, threats, fear, awards, brute force, all kind of propaganda, social engineering  can be used for this purpose. People also like power. This philosoph

y based on the on the infinite and supreme power. To be slave under a supreme power does not hurt people, because audiance would not be a community having much of freedom already and probably suffering from many causes.  

Once our virtual empire become real, we should to extend the empire, because USB rules should be obeyed everywhere, it is exclusive. If there is something appears not ruled by order of USB laws this is an offense to USB and our philosophy. Therefore we sh

ould ensure on every place in the world and the universe rules of USB be obeyed. 

In the real situation the world is ruled by different systems. There are other religions; there are kingdoms, other empires, democracies, legal systems, capitalism, and communisms. But from point of view of our philosophy they are wrong and worthless. Leg

al systems not belonging our philosophy, human rights have no value, not respectable and even not recognized.  Basically our philosophy states that we have no right as a beings at all, we are slaves of USB. Our lives are given by him and only be taken by 

him. The only authority is USB and we only responsible to him.

Now we have a doctrine not only comprised of a philosophy, a belief system and ethics but an executive, ruling system. This system need be exclusive everywhere, in the world and the universe, eternally. 

Fate also play very important role in our philosophy.  As it is assumed  essentially that  there is no cause-effect relation exist in nature. Everything is determined by fate or by orders of USB. We have limited responsibility for our actions because what

 we do is basically determined by fate. Fate cannot be overcome.  What will be happen in future is written in fate. It cannot be changed.  So if something bad happened to you or to someone else by a heuristic event, this is the fate, don't try to save you

rself or him/her. Let it die.
Even if you save them, they will die soon by another occasion.

Our philosophy denies evolution of species. This is because every species had created by USB one by one. Only USB have right of create, so species can not allowed mutate by their own, in order to produce other species.

Our philosophy is also anthropocentric as many other belief systems. This is a kind of "social engineering" (hacker term) rewarding believers by eternal existence of their kinds, exclusively. All other species have only one reason to exist: to show the po

wer of USB, and to serve people. Some of these are camels, horses and mules, goats, wheat, fishes, ducks, chickens and maybe some singing birds.  Our philosophy deny us to abuse others and species, of course without a reason. Of course there is only one r

eason for in our life, it is serve to USB.
 
Regards,

hamdi ucar

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Sun Nov 18 12:35:54 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id MAA24390;
	Sun, 18 Nov 2001 12:33:04 -0800
Resent-Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2001 12:33:04 -0800
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2001 15:40:44 -0500 (EST)
From: John Schnurer <herman antioch-college.edu>
To: Vortex <vortex-l eskimo.com>
cc: Schnurer <herman antioch-college.edu>
Subject: DEWAR FLASK CRYOGENIC looking for vendor of new and reconditioned
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1011118153706.8524G-100000 college.antioch-college.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Resent-Message-ID: <"vsGMy1.0._y5._h1-x" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45314
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 




	I am, please looking for a vendor or vendors of new and
reconditioned 10 to 50  liter 
 
	DEWAR FLASK FOR STORING AND SHIPPING CRYOGENIC GASSES

	
			PLEASE


				John Schnurer

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Sun Nov 18 18:36:28 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id SAA04752;
	Sun, 18 Nov 2001 18:33:39 -0800
Resent-Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2001 18:33:39 -0800
Message-ID: <3BF86E73.29175915 ix.netcom.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2001 18:29:08 -0800
From: Akira Kawasaki <aki ix.netcom.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en]C-CCK-MCD NSCPCD472  (Win95; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Re: DEWAR FLASK CRYOGENIC looking for vendor of new and reconditioned
References: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1011118153706.8524G-100000 college.antioch-college.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Resent-Message-ID: <"o7L5e.0.AA1.3-6-x" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45315
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

November 19, 2001

John,

I am surprised that you have not received some kind of response by now.
So I looked up Cole Palmer's catalog and they have them at the
capacitities you are looking for. The 50 liter costs about one thou--.
Talk to their customer servfice for your needs. From what I can see,
they have 'em --- for shipping also.

heir phone number: 800 323-4340 in Illinoois. Get their free catalog
(thick!).
Good luck!

-AK-

John Schnurer wrote:

>         I am, please looking for a vendor or vendors of new and
> reconditioned 10 to 50  liter
>
>         DEWAR FLASK FOR STORING AND SHIPPING CRYOGENIC GASSES
>
>
>                         PLEASE
>
>                                 John Schnurer


From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Sun Nov 18 19:25:23 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id TAA25936;
	Sun, 18 Nov 2001 19:22:07 -0800
Resent-Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2001 19:22:07 -0800
X-Authentication-Warning: eskimo.com: lajoie owned process doing -bs
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2001 19:22:05 -0800 (PST)
From: Stephen Lajoie <lajoie eskimo.com>
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Re: General ...Re: Negative inductance :: Cable Delay
In-Reply-To: <014f01c16fd5$392aada0$6401a8c0 cs910664a>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.96.1011118191710.15693A-100000 eskimo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Resent-Message-ID: <"stx4y3.0.AL6.Vh7-x" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45316
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 



On Sat, 17 Nov 2001, Colin Quinney wrote:

> J,
> 
> I was thinking of digital cable, used in digital cable television studios.
> The square wave pulses would roll off after travelling only a few dozens of
> feet. The expense of then reprocessing the signal through literally hundreds
> of miles of digital cable, and the digital delays that this introduced,
> caused extreme expense in a network TV broadcasting center. Digital TV is
> the future of broadcasting, so if you know how to cut those costs..
> 
> Colin

That sounds like an IRAD project I was prime on when I worked in research
at McDonnell Douglas 15 years ago. You didn't have these problems with
analog devices.

You need better cable. ;-D Or you can send your signal as a multiple bit
wide FM/PM signal, each bit on it's own carrier frequency. There were a
few other tricks to get around it too, like single mode fiber optics, or
chromatic multiplexing. 





From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Sun Nov 18 20:20:16 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id UAA21528;
	Sun, 18 Nov 2001 20:17:19 -0800
Resent-Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2001 20:17:19 -0800
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2001 23:24:59 -0500 (EST)
From: John Schnurer <herman antioch-college.edu>
Reply-To: John Schnurer <herman antioch-college.edu>
To: Akira Kawasaki <aki ix.netcom.com>, vortex-l@eskimo.com,
        Schnurer <herman antioch-college.edu>
Subject: Re: DEWAR FLASK CRYOGENIC looking for vendor of new and reconditioned
In-Reply-To: <3BF86E73.29175915 ix.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1011118231709.18439F-100000 college.antioch-college.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Resent-Message-ID: <"-yyeN.0.IG5.FV8-x" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45317
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 


	Dear AK,


	An associate of mine is going to foot the bill and 1,000 id out of
the range.....
	This is why I am looking for RECONDITIONED .....I know there are
vendors, I do not own a browser based E mail and must borrow time on a
machine that does, so it is not a snap for me to search.


	I cannot remember the name of the vendor, but there is at least
one that takes the Dewar's that are zongo .... and re welds, if needed....
and puts new super insulation, if needed, ... pumps them down again, and
they may have a paint or other visual flaw... but they are serviceable.

	Thanks....

	And the companies like Cole-P and Fisher etc.... almost always are
way up there in costs....  I don't even want to say price..... I want to
say Cost!  :)

		Very Thankful


				John


On Sun, 18 Nov 2001, Akira Kawasaki wrote:

> November 19, 2001
> 
> John,
> 
> I am surprised that you have not received some kind of response by now.
> So I looked up Cole Palmer's catalog and they have them at the
> capacitities you are looking for. The 50 liter costs about one thou--.
> Talk to their customer servfice for your needs. From what I can see,
> they have 'em --- for shipping also.
> 

	WAY too high



> heir phone number: 800 323-4340 in Illinoois. Get their free catalog
> (thick!).
> Good luck!
> 
> -AK-
> 
> John Schnurer wrote:
> 
> >         I am, please looking for a vendor or vendors of new and
> > reconditioned 10 to 50  liter
> >
> >         DEWAR FLASK FOR STORING AND SHIPPING CRYOGENIC GASSES
> >
> >
> >                         PLEASE
> >
> >                                 John Schnurer
> 
> 


From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Sun Nov 18 23:50:54 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id XAA22503;
	Sun, 18 Nov 2001 23:48:11 -0800
Resent-Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2001 23:48:11 -0800
X-Authentication-Warning: smtp4.ihug.co.nz: Host p673-apx1.akl.ihug.co.nz [203.173.194.165] claimed to be ihug.co.nz
Message-ID: <3BF8B5AD.B182BBB1 ihug.co.nz>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 20:33:01 +1300
From: John Berry <antigrav ihug.co.nz>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Re: DEWAR FLASK CRYOGENIC looking for vendor of new and reconditioned
References: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1011118153706.8524G-100000 college.antioch-college.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Resent-Message-ID: <"-aQXI.0.SV5.waB-x" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45318
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

How much money do you want to spend.
More liters better?
How many flasks do you want?

John Schnurer wrote:

>         I am, please looking for a vendor or vendors of new and
> reconditioned 10 to 50  liter
>
>         DEWAR FLASK FOR STORING AND SHIPPING CRYOGENIC GASSES
>
>
>                         PLEASE
>
>                                 John Schnurer

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Mon Nov 19 08:06:31 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id IAA24982;
	Mon, 19 Nov 2001 08:03:06 -0800
Resent-Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 08:03:06 -0800
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <a05100307b81e161582f7 [4.46.76.139]>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 10:03:13 -0600
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
From: thomas malloy <temalloy metro.lakes.com>
Subject: Re: Magnetic Carbon.
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
Resent-Message-ID: <"iqwbo.0.F66.vqI-x" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45319
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: RO
X-Status: 

I posted the following letter some time ago. Ed Storms, are you still 
reading these posts? I would like your opinion on this.

Have you read the article which announced this discovery? There are 
simple chemical tests for Fe, particularly when the only thing you 
have to separate is C .

On further reflection, I through C has a weight of 12, now 12 times 5 
is 60. Fe60 decays with B capture with .14 MeV. What is that? a Gamma 
particle? B capture would reduce the number of protons, which would 
change the element to Mn. Would that be Mn59? There is no such 
isotope. My understanding was that Fe57 resulted. If this is the 
case, then an isotopic spectrum would be very interesting because 
Fe57, and Fe58 are both rare, I call them 2%ers for less than 2% of 
the normal isotopic spectrum, well Fe57 is just over 2%, but that is 
still rare.

Since I'm sure that Ed Storms will weigh in on this thread, I want to 
mention a French patent, Meyer-Mace which involved the production of 
energy by the use of Fe57. I attempted to find out more about it, but 
the patent search engine that I tried didn't have any information on 
it. Since I don't know of any other search engine, other then 
Delphion, and since the document would have to be digitalized inorder 
to run it though Babelfish, I haven't done anymore with it.

>Wow. You read my mind. I was thinking the same thing when I saw that
>article. But didn't someone do a spectral analysis on the carbon powders
>and determine other materials were present?
>
>If not, then perhaps a simple arcing in carbon powder actually does
>create buckball materials. That would be a very cheap and dirty way to
>make buckyball organic magnets.
>
>Keith Nagel wrote:
>>
>>  Hi.
>>
>>  I remember discussion concerning the carbon-iron transmutation
>>  experiments centered around the magnetic properties of
>>  the resulting "iron" as proof. Someone must have suggested
>>  the possibility of magnetic carbon, but if not here's an
>>  interesting link.
>>
>>  http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99991443
>>
>>  K.


-- 

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Mon Nov 19 09:23:38 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id JAA28825;
	Mon, 19 Nov 2001 09:19:46 -0800
Resent-Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 09:19:46 -0800
Message-Id: <v01530500b81efaa93c7d [12.21.209.119]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 09:33:54 -0900
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner)
Subject: Re: Off topic ? - ultimate virtual empire
Resent-Message-ID: <"RbF951.0.J27.oyJ-x" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45320
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

At 7:48 PM 11/18/1, hamdi ucar wrote:
[snip]
> ... it is assumed  essentially that  there is no cause-effect relation
>exist in nature. Everything is determined by fate or by orders of USB. We
>have limited responsibility for our actions because what we do is
>basically determined by fate. Fate cannot be overcome.
[snip]

Because conditions anywhere necessarily change over time, sometimes
quickly, any species operating by a set of rules that are not always
adaptable sufficiently fast to survive is doomed to extinction.  Built in
adaptability is therefore a required feature of any set of governmental
rules expected to preserve a species long term.

Regards,

Horace Heffner          


From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Mon Nov 19 09:49:32 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id JAA15241;
	Mon, 19 Nov 2001 09:46:18 -0800
Resent-Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 09:46:18 -0800
Message-ID: <3BF94637.782ADE01 bellsouth.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 12:49:43 -0500
From: Terry Blanton <commengr bellsouth.net>
Organization: .
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Re: Off topic ? - ultimate virtual empire
References: <3BF7F488.9F2626C0 verisoft.com.tr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Resent-Message-ID: <"sfuXm1.0.2k3.fLK-x" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45321
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

hamdi ucar wrote:
> 
> Human history is about constituting order over communities. 

I am presently studying the history of the Roman Church from 312
CE to about 1310 CE and your treatise reminds me much of the
philosophy of Constantine (and his mother) and the church Rome
established.  It is, however, necessary to eliminate those who
are not "of the USB" for the system to work.

The dark ages weren't really dark, the Roman Church extinguished
the light.  See "Massacre at Montsegur", Zoe Oldenbourg, ISBN:
1842124285.

Regards,

Terry

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Mon Nov 19 10:49:34 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id KAA17470;
	Mon, 19 Nov 2001 10:46:16 -0800
Resent-Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 10:46:16 -0800
Message-ID: <3BF952A6.834521BA verisoft.com.tr>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 20:42:46 +0200
From: hamdi ucar <hamdix verisoft.com.tr>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: en-US
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Re: Off topic ? - ultimate virtual empire
References: <v01530500b81efaa93c7d [12.21.209.119]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Resent-Message-ID: <"hyIqV3.0.nG4.tDL-x" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45322
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

Hi Horace,

You are right, and we should hope they should extinct fast enough if there are communities belong such a philosophy. But this philosophy is essentially against to changes and instruct to fight to conserve conditions. Although, extinction is inevitable, th

is prolong their existence. Actually, we see historically and presently, many conservative communities succeed on resisting global changes, by rejecting technologies, new ideas, by isolating themselves against to changing world. This is sometime good over

all because they save they cultures and increase the global diversity. Obviously, the philosophy that I suggested have no benefit for humanity, they could even not produce a culture, can not produce art. These activities require unlocked minds. 

Assuming (,after Sep. 11) there are followers of such a philosophy in the world, I fear there may be communities belong similar philosophies all around the universe. This remind me Star Wars. These would be cosmological scale diseases. It would be very un

fortunate for humankind to encounter such a disease before evolving a bit more.

BTW, I could not able to relate the quotation to you wrote.


Horace Heffner wrote:
> 
> At 7:48 PM 11/18/1, hamdi ucar wrote:
> [snip]
> > ... it is assumed  essentially that  there is no cause-effect relation
> >exist in nature. Everything is determined by fate or by orders of USB. We
> >have limited responsibility for our actions because what we do is
> >basically determined by fate. Fate cannot be overcome.
> [snip]
> 
> Because conditions anywhere necessarily change over time, sometimes
> quickly, any species operating by a set of rules that are not always
> adaptable sufficiently fast to survive is doomed to extinction.  Built in
> adaptability is therefore a required feature of any set of governmental
> rules expected to preserve a species long term.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Horace Heffner


Regards,

hamdi ucar

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Mon Nov 19 12:11:28 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id MAA30311;
	Mon, 19 Nov 2001 12:08:15 -0800
Resent-Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 12:08:15 -0800
Message-ID: <3BF95950.3BF9CA25 ix.netcom.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 13:11:15 -0600
From: Edmund Storms <storms2 ix.netcom.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 (Macintosh; U; PPC)
X-Accept-Language: en,pdf
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Re: Magnetic Carbon.
References: <a05100307b81e161582f7 [4.46.76.139]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Resent-Message-ID: <"S6jLp.0.VP7.kQM-x" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45323
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: RO
X-Status: 



thomas malloy wrote:

> I posted the following letter some time ago. Ed Storms, are you still
> reading these posts? I would like your opinion on this.

Since you asked, here it is.  If I understand, you are proposing that five
carbon atoms combine to form an atom of Fe.  It is hard enough to justify or
understand how one nuclei can interact with another under such conditions,
let alone 5.  So you make Fe60 which would decay to Co60 by beta emission
(not k-capture) in 1.510^6 years.  Co60 is highly active and would be easy
to detect by its radiation.  I think you are barking up the wrong tree.

While the detection of Fe using a carbon arc is most easily done using a
magnet, people have also analyzed for iron.  see: Sundaresan, R.
Bockris, J. O'M. Fusion Technol. 26, 261 (1994).

>
>
> Have you read the article which announced this discovery? There are
> simple chemical tests for Fe, particularly when the only thing you
> have to separate is C .
>
> On further reflection, I through C has a weight of 12, now 12 times 5
> is 60. Fe60 decays with B capture with .14 MeV. What is that? a Gamma
> particle? B capture would reduce the number of protons, which would
> change the element to Mn. Would that be Mn59? There is no such
> isotope. My understanding was that Fe57 resulted. If this is the
> case, then an isotopic spectrum would be very interesting because
> Fe57, and Fe58 are both rare, I call them 2%ers for less than 2% of
> the normal isotopic spectrum, well Fe57 is just over 2%, but that is
> still rare.
>
> Since I'm sure that Ed Storms will weigh in on this thread, I want to
> mention a French patent, Meyer-Mace which involved the production of
> energy by the use of Fe57. I attempted to find out more about it, but
> the patent search engine that I tried didn't have any information on
> it. Since I don't know of any other search engine, other then
> Delphion, and since the document would have to be digitalized inorder
> to run it though Babelfish, I haven't done anymore with it.
>
> >Wow. You read my mind. I was thinking the same thing when I saw that
> >article. But didn't someone do a spectral analysis on the carbon powders
> >and determine other materials were present?
> >
> >If not, then perhaps a simple arcing in carbon powder actually does
> >create buckball materials. That would be a very cheap and dirty way to
> >make buckyball organic magnets.
> >
> >Keith Nagel wrote:
> >>
> >>  Hi.
> >>
> >>  I remember discussion concerning the carbon-iron transmutation
> >>  experiments centered around the magnetic properties of
> >>  the resulting "iron" as proof. Someone must have suggested
> >>  the possibility of magnetic carbon, but if not here's an
> >>  interesting link.
> >>
> >>  http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99991443
> >>
> >>  K.
>
> --

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Mon Nov 19 12:36:17 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id MAA13254;
	Mon, 19 Nov 2001 12:33:15 -0800
Resent-Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 12:33:15 -0800
Message-ID: <002c01c1713a$0b5caf70$0c6cd626 varisys.com>
From: "George Holz" <george varisys.com>
To: <vortex-l eskimo.com>
References: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1011116211037.29371L-100000 college.antioch-college.edu>
Subject: Re: Need Vendor  reconditioned lab equipment Dewar Cryogenic Please
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 15:37:45 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Resent-Message-ID: <"wq2L03.0.yE3.BoM-x" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45324
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

John Schnurer wrote:
Looking for a dewar 10 to 25 liters for storage and transport.

Hi John,
There appear to be several available on ebay
in the lab equipment section.
There is a Linde/Union Carbide, Type LR-17,
17 liter unit at:
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1662182502
with a current $50 bid price.

Regards,
George Holz             george varisys.com
Varitronics Systems     1924 US Hwy 22 East
Bound Brook, NJ          08805

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Mon Nov 19 13:15:26 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id NAA01901;
	Mon, 19 Nov 2001 13:11:51 -0800
Resent-Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 13:11:51 -0800
From: Robin van Spaandonk <rvanspaa bigpond.net.au>
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Re: Magnetic Carbon.
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 08:11:12 +1100
Organization: Improving
Message-ID: <1usivtojdk055f9mir5vjv6ihuftq9nocb 4ax.com>
References: <a05100307b81e161582f7 [4.46.76.139]>
In-Reply-To: <a05100307b81e161582f7 [4.46.76.139]>
X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.553
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id NAA01875
Resent-Message-ID: <"6V_HY2.0.dT.MMN-x" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45325
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: RO
X-Status: 

In reply to  thomas malloy's message of Mon, 19 Nov 2001 10:03:13 -0600:
[snip]
>On further reflection, I through C has a weight of 12, now 12 times 5 
>is 60. Fe60 decays with B capture with .14 MeV. What is that? a Gamma 
>particle? B capture would reduce the number of protons, which would 
>change the element to Mn. 
[snip]
AFAIK, the Fe60 decays by emitting an electron, which turns it into
Co60. Fe57 is a complete nonsense, indicating that those who wrote the
patent either didn't have a clue, or were being deliberately misleading.
The Co60 is in an excited state, and decays (in first instance) by
emitting a gamma ray. However Co60 is itself radioactive, and therefore
will eventually decay further to Ni60.


Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/

....Put the "bottom line" at the top!

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Mon Nov 19 14:19:44 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id OAA03810;
	Mon, 19 Nov 2001 14:14:01 -0800
Resent-Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 14:14:01 -0800
Reply-To: <knagel gis.net>
From: "Keith Nagel" <knagel gis.net>
To: <vortex-l eskimo.com>
Subject: RE: Magnetic Carbon.
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 17:22:54 -0500
Message-ID: <NDBBLHBMKKFMAIAFAAKMCEEJDAAA.knagel gis.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <3BF95950.3BF9CA25 ix.netcom.com>
Resent-Message-ID: <"XcH501.0.Qx.fGO-x" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45326
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

Hi Ed.

Ed Storms Writes:
>While the detection of Fe using a carbon arc is most easily done using a
>magnet, people have also analyzed for iron.  see: Sundaresan, R.
>Bockris, J. O'M. Fusion Technol. 26, 261 (1994).

OK, I'm looking at it now. I'm also looking at Fusion Technol. 26, 266
(1994)
which claims that the isotopic ratio's were those of natural iron.
What's up with that, huh?

That it also only works in an oxidizing environment is also very
interesting, kind of not what you'd expect if simple impurity
concentration were at work.

On the other hand, the levels of iron produced seemed much lower
that what Oshawa was claiming, and I wonder if magnetic carbon
wasn't what was being seen by those early experimenters.

Perhaps one of the prerequisites for this kind of fusion process is
some strange configuration of carbon atoms, like an enzyme for metals...
????

K.


> >Keith Nagel wrote:
> >>
> >>  Hi.
> >>
> >>  I remember discussion concerning the carbon-iron transmutation
> >>  experiments centered around the magnetic properties of
> >>  the resulting "iron" as proof. Someone must have suggested
> >>  the possibility of magnetic carbon, but if not here's an
> >>  interesting link.
> >>
> >>  http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99991443
> >>
> >>  K.
>
> --


From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Mon Nov 19 15:36:44 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id PAA13199;
	Mon, 19 Nov 2001 15:33:07 -0800
Resent-Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 15:33:07 -0800
X-Originating-IP: [216.254.159.14]
From: "Patrick Dowland" <patrick_dowland hotmail.com>
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: New Aetherometry Publications (fwd)
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 18:32:31 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Message-ID: <LAW2-F47mSvOhaBjACO00012e51 hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Nov 2001 23:32:31.0752 (UTC) FILETIME=[759C5080:01C17152]
Resent-Message-ID: <"9KsKx1.0.yD3.oQP-x" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45327
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

Just received this announcement.  Looks like they added a bunch of
new stuff.

Patrick Dowland

*************************************************

Dear Friends and Colleagues,

AKRONOS Publishing is pleased to announce the publication on its
web page,

                    http://www.aetherometry.com

of the following new features:


-  In the Philosophy of Science monograph series:

    AS1-03 - "(Micro)Functionalist Thoughts on the Relation
             between Art, Science and Philosophy"

             http://www.aetherometry.com/abs-AS1.html#abstractAS1-03


-  In the Experimental Aetherometry monographs series, Volume 2:

    AS2-10 - "The kinetoregenerative phenomenon and the AToS model
             of a fundamental aether energy element capable of
             counteracting gravitons"

             http://www.aetherometry.com/abs-AS2v2.html#abstractAS2-10

    AS2-11 - "A light-irreducible split-aether continuum encompassing
             production of black (HFOT) and thermal (LFOT) photons"

             http://www.aetherometry.com/abs-AS2v2.html#abstractAS2-11

    AS2-12 - "AToS theory of the volt and the electron volt - an 
aetherometric
              perspective on longitudinal electric waves"

             http://www.aetherometry.com/abs-AS2v2.html#abstractAS2-12


-  "COMBAT AGAINST (AN)ORGONOMY":


   1.  "Expose of the secret and not-so-secret misery of (An)orgonomy and
        Reichianism, considered in all of its aspects -- spiritual, 
material,
        sexual, economic and political, and in particular scientific"

         http://www.aetherometry.com/expose.html

   2.  "To Be Done with (An)orgonomists:
        Conversations with (hopefully!) the last one:
        A complete response to J. DeMeo's attack on Aetherometry"

        http://www.aetherometry.com/demeo.html

   3.  "The debacle of the OML"

        http://www.aetherometry.com/oml_debacle.html



Yours,

Laura McFinlay,
Akronos Publishing



_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Mon Nov 19 20:24:19 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id UAA25007;
	Mon, 19 Nov 2001 20:21:22 -0800
Resent-Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 20:21:22 -0800
Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.20011119221102.009bf950 pop.mail.yahoo.com>
X-Sender: cjford1 pop.mail.yahoo.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58 
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 22:21:24 +0000
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
From: Charles Ford <cjford1 yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Off topic ? - ultimate virtual empire
In-Reply-To: <3BF7F488.9F2626C0 verisoft.com.tr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Resent-Message-ID: <"4mMrF3.0.Y66.1fT-x" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45328
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

Yes...  I bought Windows too :-)

And now I am subject of the "Ultimate Salesman Bill"

Very interesting though.  If you remove all of the pre-ordained thinking 
then you start over from "lost"

Maybe it is a good place to start.



_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free  yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Tue Nov 20 15:54:59 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id PAA16622;
	Tue, 20 Nov 2001 15:51:05 -0800
Resent-Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 15:51:05 -0800
Message-Id: <v01530501b81f9a22095a [12.21.208.9]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 16:05:06 -0900
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner)
Subject: Re: Off topic ? - ultimate virtual empire
Resent-Message-ID: <"-PNo83.0.K34.dnk-x" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45329
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

At 8:42 PM 11/19/1, hamdi ucar wrote:
[snip]
>
>BTW, I could not able to relate the quotation to you wrote
[snip]

Below is a quote of your entire message.  Note the added "*******" that
sets off the portion quoted:

At 7:48 PM 11/18/1, hamdi ucar wrote:
>Human history is about constituting order over communities. This is
>somehow required because humankind has no natural order except family
>relation. There are several ways to constitute ordering (keep in order)
>system. You can keep order by force. Then write laws and rules to apply.
>This is monarchy, then after you can write laws that giving right to write
>laws to community which are under order that laws. For short it is
>democracy.
>
>But if don't have any force initially to keep the order, still you can
>write laws an describe and ordering system but there would be no reason
>that a community leave their current ordering system and switch to new
>one.
>
>But there is a way. The belief. Humankind is used to be to believe to
>supernatural entities.  If you convince them you are the agent of the
>ultimate supernatural entity, the Ultra Supreme Being (USB), and
>constitute a philosophy reflecting universal order of USB, there is a way
>people believe to you and choose your philosophy.
>
>A quick way to constitute such a philosophy and keep the things simple is
>to centralize everything around USB. As the philosophy is centralized, the
>ordering system could be also centralized. USB is the ultimate power. He
>is capable to do everything, create and annihilate. Everything is
>belonging to him. USB is not responsible for anything but everything and
>everybody is responsible to USB. Power of USB is limited in time and
>space.  Actually this is a philosophy of ultimate virtual empire. USB is
>also unique it is EXCLUSIVE. No other virtual empire could be. All claimed
>ones are false. No other empire can deal with USB Empire.
>
>Centralization in all means, centralization of power, uniqueness and
>exclusivity is the core of philosophy. This look like the equivalence
>principle of General Relativity. The theory is build by this simple
>principle. A spiritual theory like this can be build similarly.
>
>Once the core of the philosophy is constituted, remaining is explaining
>the World by this philosophy, similar to a physics theory. This is,
>sometime easy, straightforward, sometime difficulties be encountered. Such
>difficulties can be overcome by introducing some other spiritual beings,
>good and bad, just as some physics theories does. When they stuck
>somewhere, they introduce new forces, new dimensions and new virtual
>particles. Of course, one should be very wise to keep the theory in
>harmony and not introducing to much patches. These spiritual entities are
>acting individuals trough its mind or to their souls. Soul is very
>important concept, already recognized most of cultures, and mixing real
>things with hypothetical entities help to blur the conception of the
>reality. So such a complication help to introductions of belief systems to
>communities.
>
>Still there remain several difficulties which not be overcome by any
>logic. For example if everything is strictly under order of USB, how it
>appears almost everything out of order? Now the real power of the
>philosophy enters the scene. If native logic is not able solve the
>problem, change the logic. So illogical become logical. Remove the
>cause-effect relation. Introduce infinities (i.e. "renormalization" in
>physics), or state that we should not ask. After all we are very limited
>comprehension capabilities beings that USB created by causes which our
>philosophy will invent it further. Even we don't need to understand
>things, as everything is well arranged by USB (this remind me MS). Most
>important, we are not FREE beings to our own. We are belonging to USB. We
>should obey rules of USB when reasoning.
>
>Now our mind is tied by this philosophy and by such logic. No way to break
>it. Our way of thinking is replaced by a program, we are owned (as hacker
>saying). Our perception of reality is changed. We still think everything
>is logical in the when we look from the frame of this philosophy.
>
>The purpose of the science is not understanding things but to proof that
>we can not understand them. Why? Because wisdom of USB is not subject to
>understanding. We should not try to do things USB does.
>
>Second step is constituting the rules. These rules could be direct orders
>of USB (coming via special channel to the agent) or we do try reflecting
>USB orders. On making the rules we use our altered logic.
>
>These rules are about ethics, moral, preying, reconditioning our mind,
>refreshing it with the philosophy often to prevent the possibility of our
>native mind and logic come back and what we should do in real life and
>what we should not.
>
>Now everything is ready to make the virtual empire real. Only we need
>virtual punishing and rewarding mechanism to force people follow orders.
>This is hell and heaven. So everything is done in human mind, in theory,
>no exterior law enforcement is needed. But in practice these law
>enforcements are necessity. So we organize and build instruments to do it.
>
>
>The acceptance step of the philosophy by people have nothing
>special.Standard practice including promises, threats, fear, awards, brute
>force, all kind of propaganda, social engineering  can be used for this
>purpose. People also like power. This philosophy based on the on the
>infinite and supreme power. To be slave under a supreme power does not
>hurt people, because audiance would not be a community having much of
>freedom already and probably suffering from many causes.
>
>Once our virtual empire become real, we should to extend the empire,
>because USB rules should be obeyed everywhere, it is exclusive. If there
>is something appears not ruled by order of USB laws this is an offense to
>USB and our philosophy. Therefore we should ensure on every place in the
>world and the universe rules of USB be obeyed.
>
>In the real situation the world is ruled by different systems. There are
>other religions; there are kingdoms, other empires, democracies, legal
>systems, capitalism, and communisms. But from point of view of our
>philosophy they are wrong and worthless. Legal systems not belonging our
>philosophy, human rights have no value, not respectable and even not
>recognized.  Basically our philosophy states that we have no right as a
>beings at all, we are slaves of USB. Our lives are given by him and only
>be taken by him. The only authority is USB and we only responsible to him.
>
>Now we have a doctrine not only comprised of a philosophy, a belief system
>and ethics but an executive, ruling system. This system need be exclusive
>everywhere, in the world and the universe, eternally.
>
>Fate also play very important role in our philosophy.  As

*******

it is assumed  essentially that  there is no cause-effect relation exist in
nature. Everything is determined by fate or by orders of USB. We have
limited responsibility for our actions because what we do is basically
determined by fate. Fate cannot be overcome.

*******

What will be happen in future is written in fate. It cannot be changed.  So
if something bad happened to you or to someone else by a heuristic event,
this is the fate, don't try to save yourself or him/her. Let it die.
>Even if you save them, they will die soon by another occasion.
>
>Our philosophy denies evolution of species. This is because every species
>had created by USB one by one. Only USB have right of create, so species
>can not allowed mutate by their own, in order to produce other species.
>
>Our philosophy is also anthropocentric as many other belief systems. This
>is a kind of "social engineering" (hacker term) rewarding believers by
>eternal existence of their kinds, exclusively. All other species have only
>one reason to exist: to show the power of USB, and to serve people. Some
>of these are camels, horses and mules, goats, wheat, fishes, ducks,
>chickens and maybe some singing birds.  Our philosophy deny us to abuse
>others and species, of course without a reason. Of course there is only
>one reason for in our life, it is serve to USB.
>
>Regards,
>
>hamdi ucar

Regards,

Horace Heffner          


From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Tue Nov 20 23:19:12 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id XAA24354;
	Tue, 20 Nov 2001 23:16:21 -0800
Resent-Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 23:16:21 -0800
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Sender: temalloy metro.lakes.com (Unverified)
Message-Id: <a05100303b820587632f0 [4.46.76.143]>
In-Reply-To: <1usivtojdk055f9mir5vjv6ihuftq9nocb 4ax.com>
References: <a05100307b81e161582f7 [4.46.76.139]>
 <1usivtojdk055f9mir5vjv6ihuftq9nocb 4ax.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 01:09:36 -0600
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
From: thomas malloy <temalloy metro.lakes.com>
Subject: Re: Magnetic Carbon.
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
Resent-Message-ID: <"MaDjw1.0.sx5.0Jr-x" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45330
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 


-- 

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Tue Nov 20 23:35:37 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id XAA32203;
	Tue, 20 Nov 2001 23:32:40 -0800
Resent-Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 23:32:40 -0800
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Sender: temalloy metro.lakes.com (Unverified)
Message-Id: <a05100300b82105c96e08 [4.46.76.70]>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 01:33:07 -0600
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
From: thomas malloy <temalloy metro.lakes.com>
Subject: Re: Magnetic Carbon.
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="============_-1205794491==_ma============"
Resent-Message-ID: <"pe26O3.0.5t7.OYr-x" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45331
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

--============_-1205794491==_ma============
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"

   This is really irritating. I had a big message with quotes from 
everybody who responded to the message. I had computer problems and 
the entire message was erased. Basically I thanked Keith for 
reposting the URL about the magnetic Buckyballs and noted that 
whereas buckyballs resemble soot, the report says that the material 
in question was clear. I pointed out that there is another clear form 
of C.

      With regards to the production of what ever from C via an 
electrical arc. First of all, when you purchase a 99.99999 C rod and 
crucible you don't expect to have ANY significant amount of Fe in it. 
My understanding of the story is that the researchers found a 
significant amount of Fe in the dust contained in the crucible. They 
did an isotopic analasis of the material and found a significant 
amount of Fe57. Someone pointed out that this reaction was only 
observed when there was O present. Two of you mentioned Co60, 
obviously if that isotope were present there would be a significant 
amount of gamma radiation present. Someone also mentioned Mn, none of 
that was mentioned either.

      So, it all this part of the mythos of alternative physics? or is 
is possible to combine C and O in an electrical arc and get Fe.
--============_-1205794491==_ma============
Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"

<!doctype html public "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<html><head><style type="text/css"><!--
blockquote, dl, ul, ol, li { padding-top: 0 ; padding-bottom: 0 }
 --></style><title>Re: Magnetic Carbon.</title></head><body>
<div>&nbsp; This is really irritating. I had a big message with quotes
from everybody who responded to the message. I had computer problems
and the entire message was erased. Basically I thanked Keith for
reposting the URL about the magnetic Buckyballs and noted that whereas
buckyballs resemble soot, the report says that the material in
question was clear. I pointed out that there is another clear form of
C.</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; With regards to the production of what
ever from C via an electrical arc. First of all, when you purchase a
99.99999 C rod and crucible you don't expect to have ANY significant
amount of Fe in it. My understanding of the story is that the
researchers found a significant amount of Fe in the dust contained in
the crucible. They did an isotopic analasis of the material and found
a significant amount of Fe57. Someone pointed out that this reaction
was only observed when there was O present. Two of you mentioned Co60,
obviously if that isotope were present there would be a significant
amount of gamma radiation present. Someone also mentioned Mn, none of
that was mentioned either. </div>
<div><br></div>
<div>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; So, it all this part of the mythos of
alternative physics? or is is possible to combine C and O in an
electrical arc and get Fe.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </div>
</body>
</html>
--============_-1205794491==_ma============--

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Wed Nov 21 02:22:34 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id CAA30537;
	Wed, 21 Nov 2001 02:17:32 -0800
Resent-Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 02:17:32 -0800
Message-ID: <3BFB7E93.7A4815CD verisoft.com.tr>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 12:14:43 +0200
From: hamdi ucar <hamdix verisoft.com.tr>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: en-US
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Re: Off topic ? - ultimate virtual empire
References: <v01530501b81f9a22095a [12.21.208.9]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Resent-Message-ID: <"rgRPD.0._S7.yyt-x" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45332
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

Horace,

Of course you had quoted a portion on my text.  What I asked is how is your comment is related to the specific quotation of my text?

For a clarification,  The philosophy that I sketch have nothing common with my views. I write it to show it is possible a philosophy, a doctrine can  hijack  human mind or communities in certain conditions like diseases. Even philosophy for the benefit of

 humanity, trying to elevate it, can be degenerated purposely, and be understood like I described. I think human mind is particularly vulnerable to doctrines based on centralized supernatural entities, and describing how to order the world according their

 principles. 

My view is only free mind, scientific thinking and science and love (if difficult to describe love scientifically) could provide a guidelines humanity.

Here is your posting in question. it appears to me you quoted most illogical part of the philosophy and you write a general comment.

**********************************
At 7:48 PM 11/18/1, hamdi ucar wrote:
[snip]
> ... it is assumed  essentially that  there is no cause-effect relation
>exist in nature. Everything is determined by fate or by orders of USB. We
>have limited responsibility for our actions because what we do is
>basically determined by fate. Fate cannot be overcome.
[snip]

Because conditions anywhere necessarily change over time, sometimes
quickly, any species operating by a set of rules that are not always
adaptable sufficiently fast to survive is doomed to extinction.  Built in
adaptability is therefore a required feature of any set of governmental
rules expected to preserve a species long term.

Regards,

Horace Heffner          
**********************************



Horace Heffner wrote:
> 
> At 8:42 PM 11/19/1, hamdi ucar wrote:
> [snip]
> >
> >BTW, I could not able to relate the quotation to you wrote
> [snip]
> 
> Below is a quote of your entire message.  Note the added "*******" that
> sets off the portion quoted:
> 

Regards,

hamdi ucar

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Wed Nov 21 10:11:53 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id KAA04765;
	Wed, 21 Nov 2001 10:06:59 -0800
Resent-Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 10:06:59 -0800
Message-ID: <3BFBDFEB.CB58CCFC ix.netcom.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 11:10:24 -0600
From: Edmund Storms <storms2 ix.netcom.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 (Macintosh; U; PPC)
X-Accept-Language: en,pdf
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: A question of integrity
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Resent-Message-ID: <"b7FHH2.0.IA1.2r--x" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45333
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: RO
X-Status: 

Dear All,
I have undertaken a project recently you may find
interesting.

Six months ago I wrote a review called "Whatever Happened to
Cold Fusion" in which I attempt to answer the following
questions:

1. Have the claims been replicated?
2. Can prosaic errors or processes explain the effect?
3. Are reproducible patterns of behavior observed?
4. Can the effect be produced using various methods?
5. Why has the effect been so hard to replicate?
6. Does the anomalous energy have a nuclear source?
7. Can these claims be explained?

These questions were asked by skeptics early in the field's
history and only now can they be partially answered.

The resulting paper (37 pages, 250 citations) was sent to
Phys. Rev. B and a one page proposal was sent to Rev. of
Modern Physics and to Chemical Reviews.  Phys. Review took
two months to decide that the paper should be rejected,
using a form letter for the purpose.  Rev. of Modern Phys.
took one month to reject the proposal with a hand written
note from the editor to the effect that they would never
publish any paper about CF because it was pathological
science.  Chem. Rev. took three months to reject the
proposal based on the comments of four reviewers.  The
general tenor of the response was that CF was not good
science, that I could not be trusted to write an unbiased
review, and that such a paper would be an embarrassment to
the Journal.

In normal science, reviews are written by experts in the
field who take time  to read and evaluate all of the
literature, which involves applying their own particular
bias to the effort.  I have written many such reviews in
other fields. Reviews allow people outside of the specialty
to quickly acquire a basic understanding of the subject and,
therefore, are essential to the advancement of science.
Normally, a review is expected to emphasize the attitudes of
the writer.  In contrast, when CF is evaluated, only an
unbiased writer can be trusted.  However, in the real world,
this actually means a writer who agrees with the bias of
people who control such publications, there being no such
thing as an unbiased review.  A question naturally comes to
mind, "How can the attitude against the reality of CF be
changed when the means to change this attitude is controlled
by people who have a strong bias against the field?"  Even
the reasonable suggestion that the effect be duplicated by
recognized laboratories can not be applied because when such
studies are made, the results are frequently rejected by
conventional journals and are ignored by subsequent
reviewers if they do appear.

Another question comes to mind, "How universal is this
willingness to ignore all of the basic teachings of science
when evaluating claims?"  Is the entire scientific
profession corrupted by a close-minded herd mentally or is
the rejection of CF based on a few ignorant but powerful
people?  I suggest you explore these questions in your own
mind and with other people in science.  If you do not like
what you learn, I suggest you write to some of the editors
who reject papers about CF and express your concerns.  I
will be happy to provide you with the necessary names and
addresses by private e-mail.

Ed Storms





From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Wed Nov 21 10:52:02 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id KAA32340;
	Wed, 21 Nov 2001 10:49:00 -0800
Resent-Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 10:49:00 -0800
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 10:48:57 -0800 (PST)
From: hank scudder <hjscudde newton.csun.edu>
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Re: A question of integrity
In-Reply-To: <3BFBDFEB.CB58CCFC ix.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0111211031020.21093-100000 newton.csun.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Resent-Message-ID: <"wfYia1.0.wu7.RS_-x" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45334
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: RO
X-Status: 

Ed
	Because of the current attitude of publishers totally biased
against CF, it seems to me that the best response is groups like this one,
open archives like the one at Los Alamos, and other underground activities
such as Infinite Energy that get the word out about what is happening is
the only thing one can do. The submittal of a good paper to the editors at
least lets them know that CF is "undead", and maybe someo people will read
it and open their minds a little. It is going to take time. Years.

	I would like to read the paper, if it is available somewhere.

Hank 
	


On Wed, 21 Nov 2001, Edmund Storms wrote:

> Dear All,
> I have undertaken a project recently you may find
> interesting.
> 
> Six months ago I wrote a review called "Whatever Happened to
> Cold Fusion" in which I attempt to answer the following
> questions:
> 
> 1. Have the claims been replicated?
> 2. Can prosaic errors or processes explain the effect?
> 3. Are reproducible patterns of behavior observed?
> 4. Can the effect be produced using various methods?
> 5. Why has the effect been so hard to replicate?
> 6. Does the anomalous energy have a nuclear source?
> 7. Can these claims be explained?
> 
> These questions were asked by skeptics early in the field's
> history and only now can they be partially answered.
> 
> The resulting paper (37 pages, 250 citations) was sent to
> Phys. Rev. B and a one page proposal was sent to Rev. of
> Modern Physics and to Chemical Reviews.  Phys. Review took
> two months to decide that the paper should be rejected,
> using a form letter for the purpose.  Rev. of Modern Phys.
> took one month to reject the proposal with a hand written
> note from the editor to the effect that they would never
> publish any paper about CF because it was pathological
> science.  Chem. Rev. took three months to reject the
> proposal based on the comments of four reviewers.  The
> general tenor of the response was that CF was not good
> science, that I could not be trusted to write an unbiased
> review, and that such a paper would be an embarrassment to
> the Journal.
> 
> In normal science, reviews are written by experts in the
> field who take time  to read and evaluate all of the
> literature, which involves applying their own particular
> bias to the effort.  I have written many such reviews in
> other fields. Reviews allow people outside of the specialty
> to quickly acquire a basic understanding of the subject and,
> therefore, are essential to the advancement of science.
> Normally, a review is expected to emphasize the attitudes of
> the writer.  In contrast, when CF is evaluated, only an
> unbiased writer can be trusted.  However, in the real world,
> this actually means a writer who agrees with the bias of
> people who control such publications, there being no such
> thing as an unbiased review.  A question naturally comes to
> mind, "How can the attitude against the reality of CF be
> changed when the means to change this attitude is controlled
> by people who have a strong bias against the field?"  Even
> the reasonable suggestion that the effect be duplicated by
> recognized laboratories can not be applied because when such
> studies are made, the results are frequently rejected by
> conventional journals and are ignored by subsequent
> reviewers if they do appear.
> 
> Another question comes to mind, "How universal is this
> willingness to ignore all of the basic teachings of science
> when evaluating claims?"  Is the entire scientific
> profession corrupted by a close-minded herd mentally or is
> the rejection of CF based on a few ignorant but powerful
> people?  I suggest you explore these questions in your own
> mind and with other people in science.  If you do not like
> what you learn, I suggest you write to some of the editors
> who reject papers about CF and express your concerns.  I
> will be happy to provide you with the necessary names and
> addresses by private e-mail.
> 
> Ed Storms
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Wed Nov 21 11:06:42 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id LAA11110;
	Wed, 21 Nov 2001 11:05:34 -0800
Resent-Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 11:05:34 -0800
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20011121110817.00a1e8b0 mail.dlsi.net>
X-Sender: steve mail.dlsi.net
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 11:08:46 -0800
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
From: Steve <steve dlsi.net>
Subject: Re: A question of integrity
In-Reply-To: <3BFBDFEB.CB58CCFC ix.netcom.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Resent-Message-ID: <"Y5bcs3.0.Wj2.-h_-x" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45335
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: RO
X-Status: 

Ed:

May I have your persmission to post this on my website?

Steve

At 11:10 AM 11/21/2001 -0600, you wrote:
>Dear All,
>I have undertaken a project recently you may find
>interesting.
>
>Six months ago I wrote a review called "Whatever Happened to
>Cold Fusion" in which I attempt to answer the following
>questions:
>
>1. Have the claims been replicated?
>2. Can prosaic errors or processes explain the effect?
>3. Are reproducible patterns of behavior observed?
>4. Can the effect be produced using various methods?
>5. Why has the effect been so hard to replicate?
>6. Does the anomalous energy have a nuclear source?
>7. Can these claims be explained?
>
>These questions were asked by skeptics early in the field's
>history and only now can they be partially answered.
>
>The resulting paper (37 pages, 250 citations) was sent to
>Phys. Rev. B and a one page proposal was sent to Rev. of
>Modern Physics and to Chemical Reviews.  Phys. Review took
>two months to decide that the paper should be rejected,
>using a form letter for the purpose.  Rev. of Modern Phys.
>took one month to reject the proposal with a hand written
>note from the editor to the effect that they would never
>publish any paper about CF because it was pathological
>science.  Chem. Rev. took three months to reject the
>proposal based on the comments of four reviewers.  The
>general tenor of the response was that CF was not good
>science, that I could not be trusted to write an unbiased
>review, and that such a paper would be an embarrassment to
>the Journal.
>
>In normal science, reviews are written by experts in the
>field who take time  to read and evaluate all of the
>literature, which involves applying their own particular
>bias to the effort.  I have written many such reviews in
>other fields. Reviews allow people outside of the specialty
>to quickly acquire a basic understanding of the subject and,
>therefore, are essential to the advancement of science.
>Normally, a review is expected to emphasize the attitudes of
>the writer.  In contrast, when CF is evaluated, only an
>unbiased writer can be trusted.  However, in the real world,
>this actually means a writer who agrees with the bias of
>people who control such publications, there being no such
>thing as an unbiased review.  A question naturally comes to
>mind, "How can the attitude against the reality of CF be
>changed when the means to change this attitude is controlled
>by people who have a strong bias against the field?"  Even
>the reasonable suggestion that the effect be duplicated by
>recognized laboratories can not be applied because when such
>studies are made, the results are frequently rejected by
>conventional journals and are ignored by subsequent
>reviewers if they do appear.
>
>Another question comes to mind, "How universal is this
>willingness to ignore all of the basic teachings of science
>when evaluating claims?"  Is the entire scientific
>profession corrupted by a close-minded herd mentally or is
>the rejection of CF based on a few ignorant but powerful
>people?  I suggest you explore these questions in your own
>mind and with other people in science.  If you do not like
>what you learn, I suggest you write to some of the editors
>who reject papers about CF and express your concerns.  I
>will be happy to provide you with the necessary names and
>addresses by private e-mail.
>
>Ed Storms

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Wed Nov 21 12:19:26 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id MAA27748;
	Wed, 21 Nov 2001 12:16:35 -0800
Resent-Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 12:16:35 -0800
From: Robin van Spaandonk <rvanspaa bigpond.net.au>
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Re: A question of integrity
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 07:15:56 +1100
Organization: Improving
Message-ID: <bc2ovtc65ptp6uh64ibp0lu9q4ppfj5t1u 4ax.com>
References: <3BFBDFEB.CB58CCFC ix.netcom.com>
In-Reply-To: <3BFBDFEB.CB58CCFC ix.netcom.com>
X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.553
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id MAA27716
Resent-Message-ID: <"g1VSA1.0.Sn6.Yk0_x" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45336
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: RO
X-Status: 

In reply to  Edmund Storms's message of Wed, 21 Nov 2001 11:10:24 -0600:
[snip]
>Another question comes to mind, "How universal is this
>willingness to ignore all of the basic teachings of science
>when evaluating claims?"  Is the entire scientific
[snip]
Hi Ed,

I'm afraid it's almost all pervasive. When you take a close look at
astronomy and other space related sciences, you will see that the whole
lot is a house of cards based on one tenuous assumption after another.
Unfortunately the science of physics is even worse off. It has been on
the wrong course for almost a hundred years. A few sporadic individuals
are breaking with the consensus, but it will be a decade at least before
the whole house of cards comes tumbling down.
Both relativity and QM are based on false assumptions (though near
enough to correct to yield valid results in most cases).

The implication of this is that almost everyone is prepared to follow
the status quo rather than the scientific method.


Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/

....Put the "bottom line" at the top!

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Wed Nov 21 12:34:21 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id MAA04107;
	Wed, 21 Nov 2001 12:32:20 -0800
Resent-Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 12:32:20 -0800
From: Robin van Spaandonk <rvanspaa bigpond.net.au>
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Re: Magnetic Carbon.
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 07:31:41 +1100
Organization: Improving
Message-ID: <v23ovtstjivil75svib6t1vu8id0nrm3no 4ax.com>
References: <a05100300b82105c96e08 [4.46.76.70]>
In-Reply-To: <a05100300b82105c96e08 [4.46.76.70]>
X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.553
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id MAA04067
Resent-Message-ID: <"heZQf2.0.501.Jz0_x" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45337
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: RO
X-Status: 

In reply to  thomas malloy's message of Wed, 21 Nov 2001 01:33:07 -0600:
[snip]
>      With regards to the production of what ever from C via an 
>electrical arc. First of all, when you purchase a 99.99999 C rod and 
>crucible you don't expect to have ANY significant amount of Fe in it. 
>My understanding of the story is that the researchers found a 
>significant amount of Fe in the dust contained in the crucible. They 
>did an isotopic analasis of the material and found a significant 
>amount of Fe57. Someone pointed out that this reaction was only 
>observed when there was O present. Two of you mentioned Co60, 
>obviously if that isotope were present there would be a significant 
>amount of gamma radiation present. Someone also mentioned Mn, none of 
>that was mentioned either.
[snip]
If such a reaction is taking place, then a possibility is

2 x C12 + 2 x O16 -> Fe56 + 51 MeV

since 1% of C is C13,

occasionally one would get

C12+C13 + 2 x O16 -> Fe57

Did they mention the % of Fe57?


Given the large amount of energy produced by the reaction, either the
amount of Fe produced would have to have been minuscule, or a new method
of energy release must have been present.
For the latter I suggest two possibilities:
1) neutrino - antineutrino pair formation (so far no one has pointed out
why this doesn't happen more often - perhaps it just isn't observed
because it doesn't have an energy signature).
2) energy loss in the form of a deposit into the Heisenberg bank.
   (Everyone wants to take out what they haven't put in, but no one 
    seems to want to make deposits ;).


Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/

....Put the "bottom line" at the top!

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Wed Nov 21 13:17:42 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id NAA29000;
	Wed, 21 Nov 2001 13:14:37 -0800
Resent-Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 13:14:37 -0800
Message-ID: <3BFC0BDA.92011F1E ix.netcom.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 14:18:10 -0600
From: Edmund Storms <storms2 ix.netcom.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 (Macintosh; U; PPC)
X-Accept-Language: en,pdf
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Re: A question of integrity
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20011121110817.00a1e8b0 mail.dlsi.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Resent-Message-ID: <"Z2Niu.0.z47.ya1_x" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45338
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: RO
X-Status: 

Yes, by all means.  Thanks for the offer.

Ed

Steve wrote:

> Ed:
>
> May I have your persmission to post this on my website?
>
> Steve
>
> At 11:10 AM 11/21/2001 -0600, you wrote:
> >Dear All,
> >I have undertaken a project recently you may find
> >interesting.
> >
> >Six months ago I wrote a review called "Whatever Happened to
> >Cold Fusion" in which I attempt to answer the following
> >questions:
> >
> >1. Have the claims been replicated?
> >2. Can prosaic errors or processes explain the effect?
> >3. Are reproducible patterns of behavior observed?
> >4. Can the effect be produced using various methods?
> >5. Why has the effect been so hard to replicate?
> >6. Does the anomalous energy have a nuclear source?
> >7. Can these claims be explained?
> >
> >These questions were asked by skeptics early in the field's
> >history and only now can they be partially answered.
> >
> >The resulting paper (37 pages, 250 citations) was sent to
> >Phys. Rev. B and a one page proposal was sent to Rev. of
> >Modern Physics and to Chemical Reviews.  Phys. Review took
> >two months to decide that the paper should be rejected,
> >using a form letter for the purpose.  Rev. of Modern Phys.
> >took one month to reject the proposal with a hand written
> >note from the editor to the effect that they would never
> >publish any paper about CF because it was pathological
> >science.  Chem. Rev. took three months to reject the
> >proposal based on the comments of four reviewers.  The
> >general tenor of the response was that CF was not good
> >science, that I could not be trusted to write an unbiased
> >review, and that such a paper would be an embarrassment to
> >the Journal.
> >
> >In normal science, reviews are written by experts in the
> >field who take time  to read and evaluate all of the
> >literature, which involves applying their own particular
> >bias to the effort.  I have written many such reviews in
> >other fields. Reviews allow people outside of the specialty
> >to quickly acquire a basic understanding of the subject and,
> >therefore, are essential to the advancement of science.
> >Normally, a review is expected to emphasize the attitudes of
> >the writer.  In contrast, when CF is evaluated, only an
> >unbiased writer can be trusted.  However, in the real world,
> >this actually means a writer who agrees with the bias of
> >people who control such publications, there being no such
> >thing as an unbiased review.  A question naturally comes to
> >mind, "How can the attitude against the reality of CF be
> >changed when the means to change this attitude is controlled
> >by people who have a strong bias against the field?"  Even
> >the reasonable suggestion that the effect be duplicated by
> >recognized laboratories can not be applied because when such
> >studies are made, the results are frequently rejected by
> >conventional journals and are ignored by subsequent
> >reviewers if they do appear.
> >
> >Another question comes to mind, "How universal is this
> >willingness to ignore all of the basic teachings of science
> >when evaluating claims?"  Is the entire scientific
> >profession corrupted by a close-minded herd mentally or is
> >the rejection of CF based on a few ignorant but powerful
> >people?  I suggest you explore these questions in your own
> >mind and with other people in science.  If you do not like
> >what you learn, I suggest you write to some of the editors
> >who reject papers about CF and express your concerns.  I
> >will be happy to provide you with the necessary names and
> >addresses by private e-mail.
> >
> >Ed Storms

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Wed Nov 21 13:24:07 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id NAA01657;
	Wed, 21 Nov 2001 13:22:43 -0800
Resent-Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 13:22:43 -0800
Message-ID: <3BFC0DCC.EDFE7D36 ix.netcom.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 14:26:29 -0600
From: Edmund Storms <storms2 ix.netcom.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 (Macintosh; U; PPC)
X-Accept-Language: en,pdf
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Re: A question of integrity
References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0111211031020.21093-100000 newton.csun.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Resent-Message-ID: <"JhB_u3.0.pP.Zi1_x" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45339
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: RO
X-Status: 



hank scudder wrote:

> Ed
>         Because of the current attitude of publishers totally biased
> against CF, it seems to me that the best response is groups like this one,
> open archives like the one at Los Alamos, and other underground activities
> such as Infinite Energy that get the word out about what is happening is
> the only thing one can do. The submittal of a good paper to the editors at
> least lets them know that CF is "undead", and maybe someo people will read
> it and open their minds a little. It is going to take time. Years.
>
>         I would like to read the paper, if it is available somewhere.

Yes, such archives are available and easy to use.  However, no one reads
them.  At most, this will prove to historians in the future that the evidence
was available for any interested person to see, thereby making the current
crop of blockheads look even more ridiculous, for all that will be worth.  I
will eventually get the paper published and will certainly put it on my
website soon.  I will let you know when.

Ed

>
>
> Hank
>
>
> On Wed, 21 Nov 2001, Edmund Storms wrote:
>
> > Dear All,
> > I have undertaken a project recently you may find
> > interesting.
> >
> > Six months ago I wrote a review called "Whatever Happened to
> > Cold Fusion" in which I attempt to answer the following
> > questions:
> >
> > 1. Have the claims been replicated?
> > 2. Can prosaic errors or processes explain the effect?
> > 3. Are reproducible patterns of behavior observed?
> > 4. Can the effect be produced using various methods?
> > 5. Why has the effect been so hard to replicate?
> > 6. Does the anomalous energy have a nuclear source?
> > 7. Can these claims be explained?
> >
> > These questions were asked by skeptics early in the field's
> > history and only now can they be partially answered.
> >
> > The resulting paper (37 pages, 250 citations) was sent to
> > Phys. Rev. B and a one page proposal was sent to Rev. of
> > Modern Physics and to Chemical Reviews.  Phys. Review took
> > two months to decide that the paper should be rejected,
> > using a form letter for the purpose.  Rev. of Modern Phys.
> > took one month to reject the proposal with a hand written
> > note from the editor to the effect that they would never
> > publish any paper about CF because it was pathological
> > science.  Chem. Rev. took three months to reject the
> > proposal based on the comments of four reviewers.  The
> > general tenor of the response was that CF was not good
> > science, that I could not be trusted to write an unbiased
> > review, and that such a paper would be an embarrassment to
> > the Journal.
> >
> > In normal science, reviews are written by experts in the
> > field who take time  to read and evaluate all of the
> > literature, which involves applying their own particular
> > bias to the effort.  I have written many such reviews in
> > other fields. Reviews allow people outside of the specialty
> > to quickly acquire a basic understanding of the subject and,
> > therefore, are essential to the advancement of science.
> > Normally, a review is expected to emphasize the attitudes of
> > the writer.  In contrast, when CF is evaluated, only an
> > unbiased writer can be trusted.  However, in the real world,
> > this actually means a writer who agrees with the bias of
> > people who control such publications, there being no such
> > thing as an unbiased review.  A question naturally comes to
> > mind, "How can the attitude against the reality of CF be
> > changed when the means to change this attitude is controlled
> > by people who have a strong bias against the field?"  Even
> > the reasonable suggestion that the effect be duplicated by
> > recognized laboratories can not be applied because when such
> > studies are made, the results are frequently rejected by
> > conventional journals and are ignored by subsequent
> > reviewers if they do appear.
> >
> > Another question comes to mind, "How universal is this
> > willingness to ignore all of the basic teachings of science
> > when evaluating claims?"  Is the entire scientific
> > profession corrupted by a close-minded herd mentally or is
> > the rejection of CF based on a few ignorant but powerful
> > people?  I suggest you explore these questions in your own
> > mind and with other people in science.  If you do not like
> > what you learn, I suggest you write to some of the editors
> > who reject papers about CF and express your concerns.  I
> > will be happy to provide you with the necessary names and
> > addresses by private e-mail.
> >
> > Ed Storms
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Wed Nov 21 13:30:50 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id NAA05925;
	Wed, 21 Nov 2001 13:29:22 -0800
Resent-Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 13:29:22 -0800
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/9.0.1.3108
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 16:27:51 -0800
Subject: Re: A question of integrity
From: "Eugene F. Mallove" <editor infinite-energy.com>
To: "vortex l eskimo.com" <vortex-l eskimo.com>
Message-ID: <B8218687.229%editor infinite-energy.com>
In-Reply-To: <3BFBDFEB.CB58CCFC ix.netcom.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Resent-Message-ID: <"Ej3dK3.0.SS1.oo1_x" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45340
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: RO
X-Status: 

On 11/21/01 9:10 AM, "Edmund Storms" <storms2 ix.netcom.com> wrote:

> Another question comes to mind, "How universal is this
> willingness to ignore all of the basic teachings of science
> when evaluating claims?"

It is most certainly UNIVERSAL -- as far as so-called "mainstream"
publications are concerned.  In fact, we recently discovered that Nature
magazine has an actual "Index" of forbidden topics which are guaranteed NOT
to be reviewed -- entered in the review cycle, just for being that
particular topic.  It is worse even than that. I know of one instance in
which FOUR Nobel laureates vouched for a heretical *experimental* work of
fantastic importance that revealed some of the innermost workings of
acupuncture. Still the paper was rejected!

> Is the entire scientific
> profession corrupted by a close-minded herd mentally

YES!!!  For me, in fact, this is a far more profound discovery than even the
certain existence of CF.  Not only that, there are numerous people in
so-called "new physics" who keep proceeding along the same disfunctional
lines of research and theory even when experimental evidence to the contrary
has been stuck right in their faces!  I am more sympathetic to the latter,
but these people are somewhat related to the mainstream bigots.

> or is
> the rejection of CF based on a few ignorant but powerful
> people?  I suggest you explore these questions in your own
> mind and with other people in science.  If you do not like
> what you learn, I suggest you write to some of the editors
> who reject papers about CF and express your concerns.  I
> will be happy to provide you with the necessary names and
> addresses by private e-mail.

I have already learned enough to have drawn the above conclusions.  But
please do provide me the particulars -- names and addresses -- so I can
write to the villains and tell them the errors of their ways.
> 
> Ed Storms

Gene

Dr. Eugene F. Mallove
Editor-in-Chief, Infinite Energy Magazine
Director, New Energy Research Laboratory
PO Box 2816
Concord, NH 03302-2816
   editor infinite-energy.com
   www.infinite-energy.com
Ph: 603-228-4516
Fx: 603-224-5975
> 

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Wed Nov 21 13:41:48 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id NAA10898;
	Wed, 21 Nov 2001 13:38:38 -0800
Resent-Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 13:38:38 -0800
Message-ID: <3BFC1187.931DDC89 ix.netcom.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 14:42:25 -0600
From: Edmund Storms <storms2 ix.netcom.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 (Macintosh; U; PPC)
X-Accept-Language: en,pdf
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Re: A question of integrity
References: <3BFBDFEB.CB58CCFC ix.netcom.com> <bc2ovtc65ptp6uh64ibp0lu9q4ppfj5t1u@4ax.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Resent-Message-ID: <"u8lYQ2.0.Cg2.Ux1_x" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45341
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: RO
X-Status: 

Dear Robin,
I don't know if this state of affairs makes me feel better or not. Clearly,
we as a species are in another intellectual cul-de-sac at many levels.  I
suppose, we as individuals can only step over and around the bull-shit
while turning as much of it as we can into compost for eventual use on our
personal garden.  We will not be able to feed the world this way, but we
will each have a good meal once in awhile.

Ed

Robin van Spaandonk wrote:

> In reply to  Edmund Storms's message of Wed, 21 Nov 2001 11:10:24 -0600:
> [snip]
> >Another question comes to mind, "How universal is this
> >willingness to ignore all of the basic teachings of science
> >when evaluating claims?"  Is the entire scientific
> [snip]
> Hi Ed,
>
> I'm afraid it's almost all pervasive. When you take a close look at
> astronomy and other space related sciences, you will see that the whole
> lot is a house of cards based on one tenuous assumption after another.
> Unfortunately the science of physics is even worse off. It has been on
> the wrong course for almost a hundred years. A few sporadic individuals
> are breaking with the consensus, but it will be a decade at least before
> the whole house of cards comes tumbling down.
> Both relativity and QM are based on false assumptions (though near
> enough to correct to yield valid results in most cases).
>
> The implication of this is that almost everyone is prepared to follow
> the status quo rather than the scientific method.
>
> Regards,
>
> Robin van Spaandonk
>
> http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/
>
> ....Put the "bottom line" at the top!

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Wed Nov 21 14:52:43 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id OAA19225;
	Wed, 21 Nov 2001 14:49:40 -0800
Resent-Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 14:49:40 -0800
Message-ID: <04cf01c172de$c7ff5470$6401a8c0 cs910664a>
From: "Colin Quinney" <crquin home.com>
To: <vortex-l eskimo.com>
References: <3BFBDFEB.CB58CCFC ix.netcom.com> <bc2ovtc65ptp6uh64ibp0lu9q4ppfj5t1u@4ax.com>
Subject: Re: A question of integrity
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 17:49:30 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700
Resent-Message-ID: <"1es271.0.Ei4.3-2_x" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45342
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: RO
X-Status: 

Not only the errors of the last 100 years, but the vested interests in big
oil and hot fusion research budgets. They put a damper on anything that
threatens the status quo. Greed and fear cause double dealing when it comes
to peer review. There is no set timetable for acceptance of the next
paradigm shift. Unfortunately, it will probably take a crisis of major
proportions, such as running out of oil..

Meanwhile, I applaud those who continue with the research. Some of you face
severe obstacles.

Best Regards,
Colin Quinney

----- Original Message -----
From: "Robin van Spaandonk" <rvanspaa bigpond.net.au>
To: <vortex-l eskimo.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 3:15 PM
Subject: Re: A question of integrity


> In reply to  Edmund Storms's message of Wed, 21 Nov 2001 11:10:24 -0600:
> [snip]
> >Another question comes to mind, "How universal is this
> >willingness to ignore all of the basic teachings of science
> >when evaluating claims?"  Is the entire scientific
> [snip]
> Hi Ed,
>
> I'm afraid it's almost all pervasive. When you take a close look at
> astronomy and other space related sciences, you will see that the whole
> lot is a house of cards based on one tenuous assumption after another.
> Unfortunately the science of physics is even worse off. It has been on
> the wrong course for almost a hundred years. A few sporadic individuals
> are breaking with the consensus, but it will be a decade at least before
> the whole house of cards comes tumbling down.
> Both relativity and QM are based on false assumptions (though near
> enough to correct to yield valid results in most cases).
>
> The implication of this is that almost everyone is prepared to follow
> the status quo rather than the scientific method.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Robin van Spaandonk
>
> http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/
>
> ....Put the "bottom line" at the top!
>


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.298 / Virus Database: 161 - Release Date: 11/15/2001

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Wed Nov 21 15:16:08 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id PAA31243;
	Wed, 21 Nov 2001 15:13:25 -0800
Resent-Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 15:13:25 -0800
From: dtmiller midiowa.net (Dean T. Miller)
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Re: A question of integrity
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 23:13:23 GMT
Organization: Miller and Associates
Message-ID: <3bfc349a.337546315 mail.midiowa.net>
References: <3BFBDFEB.CB58CCFC ix.netcom.com>
In-Reply-To: <3BFBDFEB.CB58CCFC ix.netcom.com>
X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.5/32.452
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id PAA31196
Resent-Message-ID: <"xNPAO.0.5e7.LK3_x" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45343
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: RO
X-Status: 

On Wed, 21 Nov 2001 11:10:24 -0600, Edmund Storms
<storms2 ix.netcom.com> wrote:

>Is the entire scientific
>profession corrupted by a close-minded herd mentally

Yup.

Just wait until the reports come out about the city that has been
found just off the western coast of Cuba -- 2200 feet below the
surface.  That could shake up some paradigms.

-- Dean -- from (almost) Des Moines -- KB0ZDF

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Wed Nov 21 15:29:54 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id PAA07790;
	Wed, 21 Nov 2001 15:29:06 -0800
Resent-Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 15:29:06 -0800
Message-ID: <050301c172e4$4d12eb40$6401a8c0 cs910664a>
From: "Colin Quinney" <crquin home.com>
To: <vortex-l eskimo.com>
References: <3BFBDFEB.CB58CCFC ix.netcom.com> <3bfc349a.337546315@mail.midiowa.net>
Subject: Re: A question of integrity
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 18:29:00 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700
Resent-Message-ID: <"3ODZJ1.0.av1.2Z3_x" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45344
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: RO
X-Status: 

Hi Dean,

Please.. tell us more.

Colin Quinney

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dean T. Miller" <dtmiller midiowa.net>
To: <vortex-l eskimo.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 6:13 PM
Subject: Re: A question of integrity


> On Wed, 21 Nov 2001 11:10:24 -0600, Edmund Storms
> <storms2 ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> 
> >Is the entire scientific
> >profession corrupted by a close-minded herd mentally
> 
> Yup.
> 
> Just wait until the reports come out about the city that has been
> found just off the western coast of Cuba -- 2200 feet below the
> surface.  That could shake up some paradigms.
> 
> -- Dean -- from (almost) Des Moines -- KB0ZDF
> 


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.298 / Virus Database: 161 - Release Date: 11/15/2001

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Wed Nov 21 16:19:24 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id QAA02112;
	Wed, 21 Nov 2001 16:16:13 -0800
Resent-Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 16:16:13 -0800
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 16:16:06 -0800 (PST)
From: hank scudder <hjscudde newton.csun.edu>
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Re: Loading Pd over 1.0
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20011102153918.00ab4750 pop.mindspring.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0111021433130.22784-100000 newton.csun.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=X-UNKNOWN
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from QUOTED-PRINTABLE to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id QAA02076
Resent-Message-ID: <"TDITd.0.tW.CF4_x" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45345
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

Jed
	In my spare time, (there isn't much in grad school), I have run
some hypothetical theoretical runs on Hydrogen loading of Pd using the
CASTEP system. CASTEP is a quantum mechanical modelling system for
crystaline structures, which predicts binding energies, and
it allows relaxation of the geometric structure of the crystal to a
configuration of minimum total energy (at a temperature of absolute zero,
so molecular motion doesn't interfere). CASTEP is a portion of the Cerius2
modelling system sold by Accelrys (formerly MSI, Molecular Simulations
Inc.)
    
I set up a crystal of Pd, which normally has a body centered cubic
structure, and I let it relax to a minimum energy configuration. This
resulted in a lattice constant of 3.90953 Angstroms, and a total energy
of -3209.0223 eV.

I then set up a PdH hydride, using the same crystal structure, and
inserted a Hydrogen atom in between each Pd atom, and let it relax,
resulting in a total energy of -3273.5869 eV with a lattice constant of
4.086193 Angstroms. If I then subtract out the energy of the Hydrogen
atoms alone in this same geometry, of -53.5859 eV and of Pd alone of
-3208.5153 eV, I get a binding energy of -11.8619 eV, or -5.93095 eV
per Pd atom, which is quite stable. The average molecular energy at room
temperature, kT, is about 0.025 eV so thermal motion will not disrupt the
PdH hydride.

This is all for now, I am going home for thanksgiving holiday.
Hank



On Fri, 2 Nov 2001, Jed Rothwell wrote:

> I have often heard it is impossible to load Pd with H or D to a ratio over 
> 1.0. In other words, you cannot cram in more hydrogen atoms than there are 
> palladium atoms. So I was surprised to hear Celani claim that thin wire 
> experiments at his lab, ENEA, SRI and Pirelli have demonstrated loading at 
> higher levels, up to 1.5, and typically 1.2 to 1.3.
> 
> Cold fusion with palladium apparently depends upon high loading. For many 
> years people have been trying to develop methods to load quickly, uniformly 
> and reliably, that is, with good reproducibility.
> 
> I asked some electrochemists about this. Storms, Britz and McKubre informed 
> me that such higher loading has been observed, but it is difficult to know 
> how high the loading is actually going, because the standard methods of 
> measuring loading may not work predictably above 1.0. McKubre wrote: “There 
> is no fundamental reason why you cannot load Pd to 2 ( or even 3).  It 
> either requires double occupancy of the Octahedral sites (as conjectured by 
> no less than Linus Pauling and Julian Schwinger), or occupation of 
> the  Tetrahedral sites, as was much conjectured by Giuliano Preparata 
> (being  followed up now by Vittorio Violante), and others. There are 
> published papers in the Russian literature at D/Pd = 1.33 from ion 
> implantation.”
> 
> During his JCF3 lecture, Celani reported progress with the technique. He 
> says it used to take two days to load up to 1.3, but now it has been done 
> repeatedly in a much shorter time, with both H and D. The main problem is 
> to keep the electrolyte clean. He said, “It is possible to load hydrogen up 
> to 1.3 in one hour. When I [told] Fleischmann [about these results], last 
> month, he thought it was impossible. Completely impossible. Or at least it 
> would need three months.”
> 
> McKubre explained, “Resistance ratios that look like loadings of 1.1 (or 
> more) can easily be obtained in very thin wires (less than 125 microns) in 
> periods of only a few hours. The problem is a thermodynamic one, NOT 
> diffusion times (which are only seconds or minutes in these structures).” 
> He says ratios can be obtained, meaning that when you measure by the 
> resistance method it looks as if the wire is highly loaded, but that may 
> not be strictly true. He e-mailed me a paper about this:
> 
> Physics Letters A 276 (2000) 1­5
> 
> Temperature coefficient of resistivity at compositions
> approaching PdH
> 
> P. Tripodi, M.C.H. McKubre, F.L.Tanzella, P.A. Honnor, D. Di Gioacchino, F. 
> Celani, V. Violante
> 
> Here is the Abstract, which has quite a few Greek letters. I hope I have 
> replaced them all correctly:
> 
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> 
> Measurements have been made of the temperature coefficient of resistivity, 
> lambda, versus hydrogen concentration, H/Pd, at very high concentrations in 
> the Pd-H system. Unusually high hydrogen compositions were achieved using 
> an electrochemical loading
> procedure which allowed stable Pd­H systems to be obtained. It is well 
> known that increasing the H/Pd concentrations leads to three different 
> phases (alpha, alpha+beta, beta), respectively, in the Pd­H system; the 
> beta phase is thought to end in an asymptotic limit. Possible evidence that 
> a new phase (gamma) exists, bordering the beta phase at compositions H/Pd > 
> 0.9 is reported and discussed.
> 
>  Jed


From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Wed Nov 21 17:43:13 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id RAA11495;
	Wed, 21 Nov 2001 17:40:04 -0800
Resent-Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 17:40:04 -0800
Message-ID: <3BFC4A1D.2B53D727 ix.netcom.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 18:44:15 -0600
From: Edmund Storms <storms2 ix.netcom.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 (Macintosh; U; PPC)
X-Accept-Language: en,pdf
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Re: Loading Pd over 1.0
References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0111021433130.22784-100000 newton.csun.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Resent-Message-ID: <"Uxmj43.0.Rp2.qT5_x" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45346
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

Dear Hank,
While the fcc PdH can not be loaded beyond PdH1.0, the next phase in the system
will go to higher compositions.  I have proposed this phase is fcc PdH2, with
two H atoms at each lattice site rather than one.  To the extent that this phase
forms on a cathode, the average composition would be greater than unity. Can you
model such a structure with your program?

Ed

hank scudder wrote:

> Jed
>         In my spare time, (there isn't much in grad school), I have run
> some hypothetical theoretical runs on Hydrogen loading of Pd using the
> CASTEP system. CASTEP is a quantum mechanical modelling system for
> crystaline structures, which predicts binding energies, and
> it allows relaxation of the geometric structure of the crystal to a
> configuration of minimum total energy (at a temperature of absolute zero,
> so molecular motion doesn't interfere). CASTEP is a portion of the Cerius2
> modelling system sold by Accelrys (formerly MSI, Molecular Simulations
> Inc.)
>
> I set up a crystal of Pd, which normally has a body centered cubic
> structure, and I let it relax to a minimum energy configuration. This
> resulted in a lattice constant of 3.90953 Angstroms, and a total energy
> of -3209.0223 eV.
>
> I then set up a PdH hydride, using the same crystal structure, and
> inserted a Hydrogen atom in between each Pd atom, and let it relax,
> resulting in a total energy of -3273.5869 eV with a lattice constant of
> 4.086193 Angstroms. If I then subtract out the energy of the Hydrogen
> atoms alone in this same geometry, of -53.5859 eV and of Pd alone of
> -3208.5153 eV, I get a binding energy of -11.8619 eV, or -5.93095 eV
> per Pd atom, which is quite stable. The average molecular energy at room
> temperature, kT, is about 0.025 eV so thermal motion will not disrupt the
> PdH hydride.
>
> This is all for now, I am going home for thanksgiving holiday.
> Hank
>
> On Fri, 2 Nov 2001, Jed Rothwell wrote:
>
> > I have often heard it is impossible to load Pd with H or D to a ratio over
> > 1.0. In other words, you cannot cram in more hydrogen atoms than there are
> > palladium atoms. So I was surprised to hear Celani claim that thin wire
> > experiments at his lab, ENEA, SRI and Pirelli have demonstrated loading at
> > higher levels, up to 1.5, and typically 1.2 to 1.3.
> >
> > Cold fusion with palladium apparently depends upon high loading. For many
> > years people have been trying to develop methods to load quickly, uniformly
> > and reliably, that is, with good reproducibility.
> >
> > I asked some electrochemists about this. Storms, Britz and McKubre informed
> > me that such higher loading has been observed, but it is difficult to know
> > how high the loading is actually going, because the standard methods of
> > measuring loading may not work predictably above 1.0. McKubre wrote: “There
> > is no fundamental reason why you cannot load Pd to 2 ( or even 3).  It
> > either requires double occupancy of the Octahedral sites (as conjectured by
> > no less than Linus Pauling and Julian Schwinger), or occupation of
> > the  Tetrahedral sites, as was much conjectured by Giuliano Preparata
> > (being  followed up now by Vittorio Violante), and others. There are
> > published papers in the Russian literature at D/Pd = 1.33 from ion
> > implantation.”
> >
> > During his JCF3 lecture, Celani reported progress with the technique. He
> > says it used to take two days to load up to 1.3, but now it has been done
> > repeatedly in a much shorter time, with both H and D. The main problem is
> > to keep the electrolyte clean. He said, “It is possible to load hydrogen up
> > to 1.3 in one hour. When I [told] Fleischmann [about these results], last
> > month, he thought it was impossible. Completely impossible. Or at least it
> > would need three months.”
> >
> > McKubre explained, “Resistance ratios that look like loadings of 1.1 (or
> > more) can easily be obtained in very thin wires (less than 125 microns) in
> > periods of only a few hours. The problem is a thermodynamic one, NOT
> > diffusion times (which are only seconds or minutes in these structures).”
> > He says ratios can be obtained, meaning that when you measure by the
> > resistance method it looks as if the wire is highly loaded, but that may
> > not be strictly true. He e-mailed me a paper about this:
> >
> > Physics Letters A 276 (2000) 1?5
> >
> > Temperature coefficient of resistivity at compositions
> > approaching PdH
> >
> > P. Tripodi, M.C.H. McKubre, F.L.Tanzella, P.A. Honnor, D. Di Gioacchino, F.
> > Celani, V. Violante
> >
> > Here is the Abstract, which has quite a few Greek letters. I hope I have
> > replaced them all correctly:
> >
> > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> >
> > Measurements have been made of the temperature coefficient of resistivity,
> > lambda, versus hydrogen concentration, H/Pd, at very high concentrations in
> > the Pd-H system. Unusually high hydrogen compositions were achieved using
> > an electrochemical loading
> > procedure which allowed stable Pd?H systems to be obtained. It is well
> > known that increasing the H/Pd concentrations leads to three different
> > phases (alpha, alpha+beta, beta), respectively, in the Pd?H system; the
> > beta phase is thought to end in an asymptotic limit. Possible evidence that
> > a new phase (gamma) exists, bordering the beta phase at compositions H/Pd >
> > 0.9 is reported and discussed.
> >
> >  Jed

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Wed Nov 21 18:49:03 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id SAA09526;
	Wed, 21 Nov 2001 18:45:58 -0800
Resent-Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 18:45:58 -0800
From: dtmiller midiowa.net (Dean T. Miller)
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Re: A question of integrity
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 02:45:57 GMT
Organization: Miller and Associates
Message-ID: <3bfe597f.346991206 mail.midiowa.net>
References: <3BFBDFEB.CB58CCFC ix.netcom.com> <3bfc349a.337546315@mail.midiowa.net> <050301c172e4$4d12eb40$6401a8c0@cs910664a>
In-Reply-To: <050301c172e4$4d12eb40$6401a8c0 cs910664a>
X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.5/32.452
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id SAB09507
Resent-Message-ID: <"51s0T1.0.mK2.bR6_x" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45347
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: RO
X-Status: 

On Wed, 21 Nov 2001 18:29:00 -0500, "Colin Quinney" <crquin home.com>
wrote:

>Please.. tell us more.

This topic, about sunken cities, isn't really relevant to "new" energy
sources, but here are some WWW sites to visit.

For the Cuba site: 
 http://www.earthfiles.com/earth303.htm
http://www.cyberspaceorbit.com/cuba_underwater.html
http://www.andrewcollins.net/page/articles/lostcity.htm
http://www.cubanet.org/CNews/y01/feb01/12e7.htm

For Okinawa: 
http://www.crystalinks.com/below.html and
http://www.mozingodesigns.com/brainrape/html/japans_pyramid_pictures.html
"One of the greatest discoveries in the history of archaeology was
made last summer, off Japan.  There, spread over an amazing 311 miles
on the ocean floor, are the well-preserved remains of an ancient city.
Or at the very least, a number of closely related sites. "

There are also underwater "cities" offshore from India and other
places.

-- Dean -- from (almost) Des Moines -- KB0ZDF

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Wed Nov 21 19:46:49 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id TAA04430;
	Wed, 21 Nov 2001 19:43:45 -0800
Resent-Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 19:43:45 -0800
X-Authentication-Warning: smtp4.ihug.co.nz: Host p242-nas8.akl.ihug.co.nz [203.173.218.242] claimed to be ihug.co.nz
Message-ID: <3BFC70E0.966A0674 ihug.co.nz>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 16:28:32 +1300
From: John Berry <antigrav ihug.co.nz>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Need 6GHz
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Resent-Message-ID: <"vg5Xo.0.351.nH7_x" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45348
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: RO
X-Status: 

I need 6Ghz to inject into a caduceus coil.
And ideas?

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Wed Nov 21 20:26:27 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id UAA22676;
	Wed, 21 Nov 2001 20:23:23 -0800
Resent-Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 20:23:23 -0800
Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.20011121213758.00ada5b0 pop.mail.yahoo.com>
X-Sender: cjford1 pop.mail.yahoo.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58 
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 22:23:33 +0000
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
From: Charles Ford <cjford1 yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: A question of integrity
In-Reply-To: <B8218687.229%editor infinite-energy.com>
References: <3BFBDFEB.CB58CCFC ix.netcom.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Resent-Message-ID: <"z-6cL3.0.AY5.ws7_x" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45349
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: RO
X-Status: 

At 04:27 PM 11/21/01 -0800, you wrote:
>On 11/21/01 9:10 AM, "Edmund Storms" <storms2 ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>
> > Another question comes to mind, "How universal is this
> > willingness to ignore all of the basic teachings of science
> > when evaluating claims?"
>
>It is most certainly UNIVERSAL -- as far as so-called "mainstream"
>publications are concerned.  In fact, we recently

Gentlemen:

This is an old and redundant concern.  the "mainstream" always has, does 
and will always avoid the new.  Remember that Newton was prosecuted for his 
findings.  Remember George Simon Ohm was sited for his findings 
posthumously. Einstein suffered many years of rejection following the 1906 
publication only finally to be recognized twenty years later.  Even then 
only by a small group.  Einstein was not fully excepted unfortunately until 
the bomb was dropped.

Understand that most people get an education because that is the only way 
they can move forward.  They are not adaptable enough to grasp concepts 
that affront there belief system. (there education)  The solution is to 
remove yourself from the mainstream as it will only bring you persecution 
and disappointment.

I am quite sure that the mainstream will not accept cold fusion until it is 
generating power and attached to the grid.  I am also quite sure that in 
some cases even that will not be enough.

Edmund:

There are other places to publish this review.  For a couple of hundred 
bucks you can have it done by an on line publisher.  I am sure that you 
could sell copies and more then return this tiny investment.  Lets face it 
it is likely that Parks had to do it this way. (though he will never admit 
it) If you go to a bookstore and ask for books by him you will come away 
empty handed.  Sad but true.  Publishing is a business not a science.  As 
such a publisher will likely be more concerned with what his customers want 
then the truth.

As for the rest of us we continue to move forward even if we have to bank 
role our own work.  Just as those who came before us have done.

Einstein's success was largely based on sudden world wide 
recognition.  "The damn thing worked."

If we are to succeed with CF it must work.  It is time to stop trying to 
prove it to the mainstream and start engineering products based on this new 
science.




_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free  yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Wed Nov 21 20:38:12 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id UAA28601;
	Wed, 21 Nov 2001 20:37:14 -0800
Resent-Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 20:37:14 -0800
Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.20011121223655.00adaa40 pop.mail.yahoo.com>
X-Sender: cjford1 pop.mail.yahoo.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58 
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 22:37:45 +0000
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
From: Charles Ford <cjford1 yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: A question of integrity
In-Reply-To: <3BFC0BDA.92011F1E ix.netcom.com>
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20011121110817.00a1e8b0 mail.dlsi.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Resent-Message-ID: <"L8y572.0.p-6.v38_x" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45350
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: RO
X-Status: 

At 02:18 PM 11/21/01 -0600, you wrote:

>Yes, by all means.  Thanks for the offer.
>
>Ed
>
>Steve wrote:
>
> > Ed:
> >
> > May I have your persmission to post this on my website?
> >
> > Steve
> >
> > At 11:10 AM 11/21/2001 -0600, you wrote:
> > >Dear All,
> > >I have undertaken a project recently you may find
> > >interesting.

Steve:

Could you provide "Vo" with a link when you are done.

Thanks!



_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free  yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Wed Nov 21 21:43:09 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id VAA27110;
	Wed, 21 Nov 2001 21:40:04 -0800
Resent-Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 21:40:04 -0800
From: Robin van Spaandonk <rvanspaa bigpond.net.au>
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Re: Loading Pd over 1.0
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 16:39:22 +1100
Organization: Improving
Message-ID: <ff2pvtcup2dehckj1bnp3ohkrggj6iq0a4 4ax.com>
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20011102153918.00ab4750 pop.mindspring.com> <Pine.LNX.4.21.0111021433130.22784-100000@newton.csun.edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0111021433130.22784-100000 newton.csun.edu>
X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.553
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id VAA27076
Resent-Message-ID: <"7NSeb1.0.Wd6.q-8_x" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45351
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

In reply to  hank scudder's message of Wed, 21 Nov 2001 16:16:06 -0800:
Hi Hank,
>I set up a crystal of Pd, which normally has a body centered cubic
>structure, and I let it relax to a minimum energy configuration. This
>resulted in a lattice constant of 3.90953 Angstroms, 

The info I have says that Pd is normally face centred, not body centred
(as Ed has already pointed out), with a lattice constant of 3.8907 Ĺ.
You might like to try fcc and see if you come up with the same lattice
constant (as a test of the software).
(See http://www.webelements.com/webelements/elements/text/Pd/xtal.html )

>and a total energy
>of -3209.0223 eV.

This appears to be the total binding energy of the mini-crystal you
modelled.

(See also
http://www.webelements.com/webelements/elements/text/Pd/latt.html )

>
>I then set up a PdH hydride, using the same crystal structure, and
>inserted a Hydrogen atom in between each Pd atom, and let it relax,
>resulting in a total energy of -3273.5869 eV with a lattice constant of
>4.086193 Angstroms. If I then subtract out the energy of the Hydrogen
>atoms alone in this same geometry, of -53.5859 eV and of Pd alone of
>-3208.5153 eV, I get a binding energy of -11.8619 eV, 


I get 11.4857 eV (so I assume we are on the same track).

>or -5.93095 eV
>per Pd atom, which is quite stable. 

Given that the -11.8619 eV was what was left over for the whole crystal,
and -5.93095 eV is 1/2 of that, this would seem to imply that your
crystal only had 2 Pd atoms in it (which would make sense if you were
only looking at a single bcc lattice cell). However, I can't correlate
this with a total binding energy of thousands of eV for the pure Pd, as
that would then mean -1636.79345 eV / Pd atom which is ridiculous.

(BTW I think 5 eV is probably exorbitant anyway, as that is a pretty
large number for any chemical reaction).

>The average molecular energy at room
>temperature, kT, is about 0.025 eV so thermal motion will not disrupt the
>PdH hydride.
>
>This is all for now, I am going home for thanksgiving holiday.
>Hank
This will be waiting for you when you get back :)


Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/

....Put the "bottom line" at the top!

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Thu Nov 22 03:17:32 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id DAA16808;
	Thu, 22 Nov 2001 03:14:36 -0800
Resent-Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 03:14:36 -0800
Message-ID: <3BFCDE45.CAA9122 ix.netcom.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 03:15:17 -0800
From: Akira Kawasaki <aki ix.netcom.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en]C-CCK-MCD NSCPCD472  (Win95; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Vortex <vortex-l eskimo.com>
Subject: Publication rights: Rights and Wrongs: re:A Question of Integrity
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Resent-Message-ID: <"pgsWC3.0.U64.SuD_x" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45352
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

November 22. 2001

Vortex,

The November 12th issue of American Chemical Society's Chemical &
Engineering News Magazine has a long article on "Publication Ethics:
Rights and Wrongs which I believe is relevant to Dr. Edmund Storms'
experience with the series of rejections of his paper on a Cold Fusion
review. Perhaps Dr. Storms, a retired chemist, may still be a member of
the ACS and has access to the article. It is unfortunate that the
article, although also available online, is available only to
subscribers.
The subtitle to the article is: 'Balancing obligations and interests
surrounding dissemination of research is an arduous task.'
:The article is comprehensibly written by Stephen K. Ritter, C&EN
Washington.
Quote: "Integrity and Trust. These values are the hallmarks of the
scientific discovery and publication process. Being objective is
critical to this process, because communicating one's research is to the
scientific community is at the heart of what keeps science alive. It's
also the principal way that scientists make their reputations, get jobs,
and promotions, and obtain sustained research support.
But" ---- unquote.
Among the topics touched on are:
Commercial interests interwoven into research, control of patents,
'collegial' competitiveness, economic gains - personal and
institutional, credit equality, misconduct, low ethical awareness and
adherence to standards, and publication ethics.
One item mentioned that complicates the publication issue is the 1980
Bayh- Dole Act. This act is intended to facilitate technology transfer
from federally (your tax money) funded institutional research to
commercial development. The Act has caused the enrichment of those
institutions and researchers but also has caused the GREED process to
start interfering with the pure investigation process of academic
research and invention. So in a sense, Science is no longer pure or
'normal. It tries to but never has been. It is more muddied than before.
There has been outcries and bemoaning of the so called "Inventor's
Disease" which supposedly interfered with 'progress'. It seems the
disease is not too pathological as asserted. Perhaps there is another
more deadly disease that is fast spreading: 'The Science Process
Disease' with the death of integrity, trust, and objectivity.

The details of the Bayh-Dole Act is available online.
Also there is a link in the ACS article to Sigma XI's publications:
"Honor in Science" and "The Responsible Researcher: Path and Pitfalls"
Also Sigma XI had a forum  in November 9-10, 2000: "New Ethical
Challenges in Science and Technology"
The forum proceedings can be downloaded free.

-AK-

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Thu Nov 22 07:56:41 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id HAA11164;
	Thu, 22 Nov 2001 07:56:13 -0800
Resent-Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 07:56:13 -0800
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <a05100306b8223560c81c [4.46.76.70]>
In-Reply-To: <B8218687.229%editor infinite-energy.com>
References: <B8218687.229%editor infinite-energy.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 09:56:49 -0600
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
From: thomas malloy <temalloy metro.lakes.com>
Subject: Re: A question of integrity
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
Resent-Message-ID: <"JCASX2.0.Ek2.T0I_x" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45354
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: RO
X-Status: 

Eugene Mallove posted;

>so-called "new physics" who keep proceeding along the same disfunctional
>lines of research and theory even when experimental evidence to the contrary
>has been stuck right in their faces!  I am more sympathetic to the latter,
>but these people are somewhat related to the mainstream bigots.

I'm surprised that they would refuse to acknowledge an article on 
acupuncture. OTOH, they are happy to ignore what ever violates their 
pet paradigm. A classic for instance of this is the isotopic spectrum 
which shows anomylous amounts of rare isotopes. Robert Cook's 
inertial drive which assuming it is true would turn science on it's 
head has been totally ignored.

>I have already learned enough to have drawn the above conclusions.  But
>please do provide me the particulars -- names and addresses -- so I can
>write to the villains and tell them the errors of their ways.
>>
>  > Ed Storms
>
>The best thing that we can do is to cronicle the truth and push 
>ahead with new developments. When this thing breaks it will make all 
>of them look like fools.


-- 

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Thu Nov 22 07:57:55 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id HAA10673;
	Thu, 22 Nov 2001 07:54:37 -0800
Resent-Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 07:54:37 -0800
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <a05100305b821dcc6f4fd [4.46.76.70]>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 09:55:05 -0600
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
From: thomas malloy <temalloy metro.lakes.com>
Subject: Your opinions please
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
Resent-Message-ID: <"qiB9r1.0.hc2.z-H_x" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45353
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: RO
X-Status: 

Vortexians, I received the following message from Bruce Meland. I was 
in a meeting with a mechanical engineer yesterday, he mentioned 100+ 
MPG carburators as an example of a machine which simpley couldn't 
work, because, "you can calculate the amount of energy in a gallon of 
gasoline, and you can't get enough energy out to make this possible." 
When I read this letter it occurred to me that if you have a car that 
is getting 20 MPG and it is extracting 20% of the energy in the 
gasoline then if you managed to extract 100% of the energy in it you 
could get 100 MPG, unfortunately the engine and it's exhaust would be 
cold, which would be a problem particularly here in Minnesocold.

The question of supression that he raises is a lot more insidious. 
Particularly if it involves FBI and other governmental agencies. I'm 
going to see if I can get get someone to investigate this story.

I think I detect the odor of BS.

I have a friend who also has a BSME degree. Several weeks ago he told 
me about this website, So we shall see.

From: "bruce meland" <etimes teleport.com>

The Preview 2002 edition of Electrifying Times published a feature article
on high milage carburetors and their supression by the oil  and auto
companies. This is just another chapter in the continuing saga in the world
of making the
planet a cleaner place to live and the supression the these technologies by
the large corporations. check out our web site, www.electrifyingtimes.com
for more revolutionary technology that will make our  planet more livable
and keep us our of wars which are essentially fought over oil and natural
resources.  Spread the word about this topic.
SUPRESSION    OR  COINCIDENCE ?

                                       YOU DECIDE

     IS... US. PATENT # 5,782,225....BEING SUPPRESSED.....OR...ARE  THE
     "HARDSHIPS". THAT. THE." INVENTOR SUFFERED"..JUST
     .A."COINCIDENCE".??????." YOU DECIDE "



     In  the early 1970  I owned and operated a company called  Debal
Heating and Air cond.  In Brockton  Ma. This was about the time that we
had that phony gasoline shortage  . Each morning myself and 12 employees
would
sit in the  gas line with 6 trucks to get a mere 5 gallons of gasoline.

     As I sat in that gasoline line day after day, I started to think there
must be a better way. If they have the technology to put a man on the moon
they must have
the  technology to get  much better gas mileage . I read everything that I
could get my hands on about this technology. It wasn't long before I built
my first fuel vaporization system .

     Well sad to say it didn't work . It made plenty of vapors, and exploded
like a BOMB. Over 70% of my body received  3rd.burns. I spent 69 days in
intensive
care, kissing death several times. Don't worry  all the bugs are worked out
now.

October 15 1983 was the birth of    My fuel implosion vaporization
system.At this time I owned and operated a company in Brockton ma. called
weatherall  Energy Research and development.  I had just finished building a
commercial high efficiency air condition evaporating  Coil. I poured one
gallon of gasoline in one end
  to flush it out, to my surprise massive fumes discharged from the otheR end
and all I  got back was less than one cup of gasoline.

     I started brain storming, I miniaturized  the air cond. evaporator coil
installed it in 1973 Dodge station wagon with a 318 engine.  By early 1986
we had  worked out all the short comings and bugs and had a working
prototype that gave  between 111 to 113 mpg.

We placed an add in the Brockton enterprise and Boston globe, seeking people
to Bata test our fuel implosion system. It wasn't long before I  a got a
call from a California Corp. wanting
exclusive rights to our invention. my attorney checked them out. they were
subsidiary of
several other corporations finally all owned by a oil co.  I declined there
offer.
Shortly there after all  my troubles started. First came two men showed Id
saying that they were from The FBI. and that I was  violating federal laws.
alterations to cerebration systems. and if convicted i could get
20 years in a federal prison. I called my attorney, told him what happened,
My attorney informed me that I wasn't in any violation of any federal laws.

     If I was smart I should of stopped here. ( BUT I AM NOT  TO SMART)  For
about the next two weeks I would receive every day in the mail  in a plain
envelope 8x10 close up Photos of my wife  in the super market, church, and
my children getting on  and off the school bus and in the playground at
school. ( just
pictures only)  In addition we would get all kinds of weird calls mostly
after 2am. My wife couldn't take any more, she filed for divorce and left
me. A few days later my Attorney should up at my office , looking white as a
Ghost ,he  had all my legal files and records with him placed them on my
desk and
said that he could no longer represent me in any legal matters. I asked why.
All he
would say is  WAKE UP . I could not understand. he had been my personal
friend and
attorney for over 16 years.

     When  my wife divorced me, My Attorney abandoned  me, what alse could
happen, I thought nothing, nobody can stop me now, so on with my fuel
implosion
system. Boy was I wrong hell opened up and swallowed me alive.
   I am a very light drinker, if I drink 6 cans of beer a year I did a lot
of drinking.  I never did drugs or was around anybody that did.
On July 4 , 1986  The chief of the Brockton Police Richard Sprawls. with
a bunch of other Brockton Police raided my Tremont St  Brockton home, and
arrested
me for  trafficking of cocaine. My bail was set at $500.000.

     I was lucky That I had a friend LT. Jim Sullivan of the Brockton Pd. he
showed up at my bail hearing and said something to the judge, and my bail
was reduced
to $500.00.  Is somebody trying to tell me something?,

     Oh well back to work, I built two more fuel implosion systems.  I
installed them in a
     1973 Olds Cutlass and  1966 Mustang. I painted my 1973 Dodge station
wagon bright yellow, with big red
letters  all over it saying . THIS CAR GETS OVER 100MPG. AND DOESN'T
POLLUTE THE AIR .
THE BIG BOYS ARE TRYING TO MAKE ME AND THIS CAR DISAPPEAR.  "HELP ME. "

     I only got to drive  my yellow wagon for 3 days,  On November 24,1986
Brockton Chief of police Richard Sprawls. and other members of the Brockton
police dept.raided my Tremont st.  home, they seized two shot guns, a 12 ga.
and a
20 ga. both  were legally registered to me. I used to use them for skeet
shooting. I
was arrested and charged with for trafficking of cocaine again. My bail was
revoked.
I was placed in max security in the Plymouth House of correction. I was now
sentenced to
15 yrs for  the July 1996 trafficking cocaine. and waiting for the second
trial for
the November.   I  knew where I could get some solid evidence that would
clear me. but I
didn't know  who to trust ANYMORE. so I Escaped from max security.   went
and got my
     solid evidence and gave it to the right person and surrendered the same
day.

     Boy I was lucky  they had over 240 law enforcement offers searching for
me with  guns dogs Helicopters and ect. I ran like a jack rabbit through the
woods, My advantage was the woods were my old hunting grounds.

     Two days later  Brockton's  Chief of police was arrested for STEELING
     COCAINE FORM THE POLICE EVIDENCE LOCKER. HE WAS
     SENTENCED TO TWO YEARS IN PRISON.

     REMEMBER THE COCAINE THAT CHIEF RICHARD SPRAWLS SAID HE FOUND AT
     MY HOME IN JULY AND NOVEMBER 1986. NOW I KNOW WHERE IT CAME FROM,
     THE POLICE EVIDENCE LOCKER, AND IT FELL OUT OF CHIEFS SPRAWLS POCKET
     ON TO THE FLOOR IN MY HOME WHERE ANOTHER BROCKTON POLICE OFFICER
     FOUND IT.

     Well the Massachusetts Supreme Court of Appeals. overturned my
     cocaine trafficking  conviction. grounds tainted evidence ,illegal
     search and seizure.

        FREEDOM AND HOME  HERE I COME . WRONG AGAIN..  HERE COMES THE FEDS.
THEY HAD A WARRANT FOR MY ARREST FOR VIOLATING

     A NEW GUN LAW THAT WAS PASSED ON NOVEMBER 24,1986. THAT WAS JUST 9
     DAYS AFTER MY ARREST OF  November 14,1986. Remember the Brockton police
     seized my two shot guns? Guess what?  I had the privilege   of being the
first person in
Massachusetts  and the 3rd  person in the United States Tried, Prosecuted
and Sentenced under this new law, USC 16921g and 924e.  I didn't stand a
chance, there was no case law in
the law books to support my defense of this new law.  I was sentenced to 2
5years for perjury. because when I bought the two shot  guns there was a box
that said were you ever convicted of a felony. I
checked the no  box, because I was never convicted of a felony, just a
mister meaner .
well the feds said under federal law my mister meaner was a felony,
therefore I was
guilty of 2 counts of perjury. they gave me 5 years on each count. Next I
got 5 years for being a convicted felon in possession of a fire arms. Now I
have been sentenced to a total of 15 years federal in federal
  prison with out parole. I am still sitting in the court rm. after a week of
trial, my attorney
said that the Us  attorney was trying me under the second part of the new
law, My attorney
said the trial will be short, won't last more that ten minutes. There was no
way!.

     Well it went like this.

     1: I was convicted as a felon in possession of a fire arm.

     2: I was convicted of perjury.

     3: I was convicted of a second count of perjury.

     BINGO I HIT THE JACK POT>

     USC18922g-e1 states If you have 3 Pryor felony convictions and have
possession of a fire arm then you are a ARMED Courier  Criminal and carries
a min.
mandatory sentence of 15 years with out parole.  Now I have a total of 30
years in federal prison with out parole. Well the feds have me tucked away
for 30 years where I cannot cause any more trouble with my fuel implosion
system.

      WRONG, WRONG, WRONG :

     I met a lot of powerful people in the federal prison, with powerful
connections on the
     out side, Kenny D. who son was a Patent Attorney for a large Patent law
firm, and who did our US patent.#5, 782,225. while I sat in the safety of
the federal prison system.

     Remember the feds sentenced me to 30 years with out parole.???  Well on
September 13,1997 ( Friday the 13th my lucky day)   I was released from
federal
with 5 years parole.  STOP something's wrong here.. I only did 10years of a
30 year
sentence, with  no chance of parole.

     Well it took the Federal courts to rule that It was legal for me to
possess the two shot guns . that they had no jurisdiction . the case is now
pending in the
1st district court. They will not rule on it.

     This September 2001 will be 5 years that I have been out of federal
prison. and have been a good boy nice and quit until now.

     My Intentions.

     In the past 5 years I found out that the oil companies will do
everything in their power to suppress this kind of technology because it
could reduce the gasoline
     consumption in the United states by 76% over a 5 year term.  The
government  will lose mega bucks in gasoline taxes.  The major car
manufactures will lose billions spent on the technology of
the fuel injection systems. My technology makes there obsolete.

     I put all my patent ,shop drawings up on the below web site. for anybody
to use. It is free!  I am 58
     1/2 years young now, the sand is running out of my hr glass fast.  I
don't want to take  this technology to my grave with me.

     If you think that I should get something out of this, then build my fuel
implosion system, and after your 5th tank of gas send me the price of a tank
of
gas other wise  I don't want a cent.  If you believe that me and my patent
and technology have been
suppressed. Then Go back to the home page and vote yes for this technology.
and tell
as many  people as you can about my story. and ask them to do the same.

     The reason I ask this is.

     I believe that millions of people around the globe want this kind of
technology. and knows it exists.  When we get enough people wanting this
technology, I have powerful
attorneys  who know and are able to present it to the courts of the globe .
      I will take my remaining 7 cars  that have my fuel implosion system in
them out of exile and drive them from Boston to California with the whole
world watching, which I think my chances of reaching California alive are
excellent.  For more information go to my web site www.get113to138mpg.com




     Thank you for your interest. "Please help me spread the word.
To make this technology available to the public globally vote yes on our web
site www.get113to138mpg.com
    Or if you will be one of those who oppose this type of technology vote no
for this technology.

     Sincerely

     Allen Caggiano
Please spread the word far and wide!
-- 

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Thu Nov 22 13:12:47 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id NAA24669;
	Thu, 22 Nov 2001 13:09:50 -0800
Resent-Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 13:09:50 -0800
Message-ID: <3BFD5C47.9860FFEF ix.netcom.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 14:13:22 -0600
From: Edmund Storms <storms2 ix.netcom.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 (Macintosh; U; PPC)
X-Accept-Language: en,pdf
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Re: A question of integrity
References: <3BFBDFEB.CB58CCFC ix.netcom.com> <3bfc349a.337546315@mail.midiowa.net> <050301c172e4$4d12eb40$6401a8c0@cs910664a> <3bfe597f.346991206@mail.midiowa.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="------------3F34D1B6F49E43B2BE8DAE6D"
Resent-Message-ID: <"WSuXL3.0.N16.UcM_x" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45355
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: RO
X-Status: 


--------------3F34D1B6F49E43B2BE8DAE6D
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit



Observation of underwater cities from ancient times is consistent with
Michael Mandeville's www.michaelmandeville.com proposed shift of the crust
about 12,000 yeas ago.  This idea also has other supporting evidence which
can be read in his book. While such a possibility is interesting, it has
particular importance to us at this time because he claims another shift may
occur in the near future.  Perhaps knowing the past, even the one so long
ago, has some meaning to us today.

Ed

"Dean T. Miller" wrote:

> On Wed, 21 Nov 2001 18:29:00 -0500, "Colin Quinney" <crquin home.com>
> wrote:
>
> >Please.. tell us more.
>
> This topic, about sunken cities, isn't really relevant to "new" energy
> sources, but here are some WWW sites to visit.
>
> For the Cuba site:
>  http://www.earthfiles.com/earth303.htm
> http://www.cyberspaceorbit.com/cuba_underwater.html
> http://www.andrewcollins.net/page/articles/lostcity.htm
> http://www.cubanet.org/CNews/y01/feb01/12e7.htm
>
> For Okinawa:
> http://www.crystalinks.com/below.html and
> http://www.mozingodesigns.com/brainrape/html/japans_pyramid_pictures.html
> "One of the greatest discoveries in the history of archaeology was
> made last summer, off Japan.  There, spread over an amazing 311 miles
> on the ocean floor, are the well-preserved remains of an ancient city.
> Or at the very least, a number of closely related sites. "
>
> There are also underwater "cities" offshore from India and other
> places.
>
> -- Dean -- from (almost) Des Moines -- KB0ZDF

--------------3F34D1B6F49E43B2BE8DAE6D
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
<a href="http://www.michaelmandeville.com/phoenix/phoenix.htm"></a>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.michaelmandeville.com/phoenix/phoenix.htm"></a>
<p>Observation of underwater cities from ancient times is consistent with
Michael Mandeville's <a href="http://www.michaelmandeville.com/phoenix/phoenix.htm">www.michaelmandeville.com
</a>proposed shift of the crust about 12,000 yeas ago.&nbsp; This idea
also has other supporting evidence which can be read in his book. While
such a possibility is interesting, it has particular importance to us at
this time because he claims another shift may occur in the near future.&nbsp;
Perhaps knowing the past, even the one so long ago, has some meaning to
us today.
<p>Ed
<p>"Dean T. Miller" wrote:
<blockquote TYPE=CITE>On Wed, 21 Nov 2001 18:29:00 -0500, "Colin Quinney"
&lt;crquin home.com>
<br>wrote:
<p>>Please.. tell us more.
<p>This topic, about sunken cities, isn't really relevant to "new" energy
<br>sources, but here are some WWW sites to visit.
<p>For the Cuba site:
<br>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.earthfiles.com/earth303.htm">http://www.earthfiles.com/earth303.htm</a>
<br><a href="http://www.cyberspaceorbit.com/cuba_underwater.html">http://www.cyberspaceorbit.com/cuba_underwater.html</a>
<br><a href="http://www.andrewcollins.net/page/articles/lostcity.htm">http://www.andrewcollins.net/page/articles/lostcity.htm</a>
<br><a href="http://www.cubanet.org/CNews/y01/feb01/12e7.htm">http://www.cubanet.org/CNews/y01/feb01/12e7.htm</a>
<p>For Okinawa:
<br><a href="http://www.crystalinks.com/below.html">http://www.crystalinks.com/below.html</a>
and
<br><a href="http://www.mozingodesigns.com/brainrape/html/japans_pyramid_pictures.html">http://www.mozingodesigns.com/brainrape/html/japans_pyramid_pictures.html</a>
<br>"One of the greatest discoveries in the history of archaeology was
<br>made last summer, off Japan.&nbsp; There, spread over an amazing 311
miles
<br>on the ocean floor, are the well-preserved remains of an ancient city.
<br>Or at the very least, a number of closely related sites. "
<p>There are also underwater "cities" offshore from India and other
<br>places.
<p>-- Dean -- from (almost) Des Moines -- KB0ZDF</blockquote>
</html>

--------------3F34D1B6F49E43B2BE8DAE6D--

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Thu Nov 22 14:27:42 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id OAA18382;
	Thu, 22 Nov 2001 14:24:44 -0800
Resent-Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 14:24:44 -0800
X-Authentication-Warning: eskimo.com: lajoie owned process doing -bs
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 14:24:41 -0800 (PST)
From: Stephen Lajoie <lajoie eskimo.com>
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Re: A question of integrity
In-Reply-To: <bc2ovtc65ptp6uh64ibp0lu9q4ppfj5t1u 4ax.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.96.1011122141719.29937A-100000 eskimo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Resent-Message-ID: <"McQ9_.0.8V4.hiN_x" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45356
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: RO
X-Status: 

On Thu, 22 Nov 2001, Robin van Spaandonk wrote:

> Unfortunately the science of physics is even worse off. It has been on
> the wrong course for almost a hundred years.

You need to elaborate on that. 

I don't see a problem with science, I see a problem with people getting
degrees that either give lip service to the principles of science or don't
even know what the principles of science ARE. "Science" is not taught as a
way to know the world, but as a collection of facts handed down to us by
"scientists". Isn't that the theme of Dr. Storms' post? I don't think he
meant to say that physics has been on the wrong course. 


> A few sporadic individuals
> are breaking with the consensus, but it will be a decade at least before
> the whole house of cards comes tumbling down.

What house of cards?


> Both relativity and QM are based on false assumptions (though near
> enough to correct to yield valid results in most cases).

I don't think so. Please give specific examples. Relativity and QM have
been very successful theories in that you can use them to make accurate
predictions. The standard theory even more so. If the assumptions are
false, then what errors are they causing?

> The implication of this is that almost everyone is prepared to follow
> the status quo rather than the scientific method.

You observe, you form a theory, and then you test the theory to make
predictions, and see if the predictions are correct. The predictions are
correct. How is SR/GR & QM not following the scientific method?

Happy Thanksgiving!


From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Thu Nov 22 15:58:01 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id PAA15929;
	Thu, 22 Nov 2001 15:54:36 -0800
Resent-Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 15:54:36 -0800
X-Authentication-Warning: eskimo.com: lajoie owned process doing -bs
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 15:54:32 -0800 (PST)
From: Stephen Lajoie <lajoie eskimo.com>
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Re: A question of integrity
In-Reply-To: <04cf01c172de$c7ff5470$6401a8c0 cs910664a>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.96.1011122155030.4083A-100000 eskimo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Resent-Message-ID: <"NMh5I3.0.pu3.x0P_x" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45357
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: RO
X-Status: 

On Wed, 21 Nov 2001, Colin Quinney wrote:

> Not only the errors of the last 100 years, but the vested interests in big
> oil and hot fusion research budgets. 

What errors? I agree that there is a bias against cold fusion, as to why
we can only speculate. There are other subjects which are not well
received either; but for the most part, much of the last 100 years of work
has been valid. It seems to me that the sins are one of omission rather
than advocating false facts.

> They put a damper on anything that
> threatens the status quo. Greed and fear cause double dealing when it comes
> to peer review. There is no set timetable for acceptance of the next
> paradigm shift. Unfortunately, it will probably take a crisis of major
> proportions, such as running out of oil..

I don't see how you can chalk it up to greed. There are many possible bad
reasons why cold fusion isn't accepted, and there are probably several at
work depending upon the "skeptic" or nay sayer involved.

> Meanwhile, I applaud those who continue with the research. Some of you face
> severe obstacles.
> 
> Best Regards,
> Colin Quinney
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Robin van Spaandonk" <rvanspaa bigpond.net.au>
> To: <vortex-l eskimo.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 3:15 PM
> Subject: Re: A question of integrity
> 
> 
> > In reply to  Edmund Storms's message of Wed, 21 Nov 2001 11:10:24 -0600:
> > [snip]
> > >Another question comes to mind, "How universal is this
> > >willingness to ignore all of the basic teachings of science
> > >when evaluating claims?"  Is the entire scientific
> > [snip]
> > Hi Ed,
> >
> > I'm afraid it's almost all pervasive. When you take a close look at
> > astronomy and other space related sciences, you will see that the whole
> > lot is a house of cards based on one tenuous assumption after another.
> > Unfortunately the science of physics is even worse off. It has been on
> > the wrong course for almost a hundred years. A few sporadic individuals
> > are breaking with the consensus, but it will be a decade at least before
> > the whole house of cards comes tumbling down.
> > Both relativity and QM are based on false assumptions (though near
> > enough to correct to yield valid results in most cases).
> >
> > The implication of this is that almost everyone is prepared to follow
> > the status quo rather than the scientific method.
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Robin van Spaandonk
> >
> > http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/
> >
> > ....Put the "bottom line" at the top!
> >
> 
> 
> ---
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.298 / Virus Database: 161 - Release Date: 11/15/2001
> 
> 

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Thu Nov 22 20:49:51 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id UAA23071;
	Thu, 22 Nov 2001 20:46:37 -0800
Resent-Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 20:46:37 -0800
Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.20011122224216.00adb200 pop.mail.yahoo.com>
X-Sender: cjford1 pop.mail.yahoo.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58 
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 22:42:41 +0000
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
From: Charles Ford <cjford1 yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Need 6GHz
In-Reply-To: <3BFC70E0.966A0674 ihug.co.nz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Resent-Message-ID: <"50y4u1.0.Ke5.jIT_x" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45358
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

At 04:28 PM 11/22/01 +1300, you wrote:

>I need 6Ghz to inject into a caduceus coil.
>And ideas?

Got an old radar detector?


_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free  yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Thu Nov 22 22:37:00 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id WAA28367;
	Thu, 22 Nov 2001 22:34:05 -0800
Resent-Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 22:34:05 -0800
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <a05100300b82392c4d92d [4.46.76.70]>
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2001 00:34:20 -0600
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
From: thomas malloy <temalloy metro.lakes.com>
Subject: Fwd: [svpvril] Scientists build tiny computer from DNA
Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
Resent-Message-ID: <"brPfj1.0.9x6.StU_x" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45359
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

<!doctype html public "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<html><head><style type="text/css"><!--
blockquote, dl, ul, ol, li { padding-top: 0 ; padding-bottom: 0 }
 --></style><title>Fwd: [svpvril] Scientists build tiny computer from
DNA</title></head><body>
<blockquote type="cite" cite><br></blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite" cite><br></blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite" cite><font size="+2"><b>Scientists build tiny
computer from DNA</b></font><br>
<font size="+2"><b></b></font></blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite" cite>LONDON (Reuters) - Following Mother
Nature's lead, Israeli scientists have built a DNA computer so tiny
that a trillion of them could fit in a test tube and perform a billion
operations per second with 99.8 percent accuracy.<br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite" cite>Instead of using figures and formulas to
solve a problem, the microscopic computer's input, output and software
are made up of DNA molecules -- which store and process encoded
information in living organisms.<br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite" cite>Scientists see such DNA computers as
future competitors to for their more conventional cousins because
miniaturisation is reaching its limits and DNA has the potential to be
much faster than conventional computers.<br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite" cite>&quot;We have built a nanoscale computer
made of biomolecules that is so small you cannot run them one at a
time. When a trillion computers run together they are capable of
performing a billion operations,&quot; Professor Ehud Shapiro of the
Weizmann Institute in Israel told Reuters on Wednesday.<br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite" cite>It is the first programmable autonomous
computing machine in which the input, output, software and hardware
are all made of biomolecules.<br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite" cite>Although too simple to have any immediate
applications it could form the basis of a DNA computer in the future
that could potentially operate within human cells and act as a
monitoring device to detect potentially disease-causing changes and
synthesise drugs to fix them.<br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite" cite>The model could also form the basis of
computers that could be used to screen DNA libraries in parallel
without sequencing each molecule, which could speed up the acquisition
of knowledge about DNA.<br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite" cite>ENORMOUS POTENTIAL<br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite" cite>DNA can hold more information in a cubic
centimetre than a trillion CDs. The double helix molecule that
contains human genes stores data on four chemical bases -- known by
the letters A, T, C and G -- giving it massive memory capability that
scientists are only just beginning to tap into.<br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite" cite>&quot;The living cell contains incredible
molecular machines that manipulate information-encoding molecules such
as DNA and RNA (its chemical cousin) in ways that are fundamentally
very similar to computation,&quot; said Shapiro, the head of the
research team that developed the DNA computer.<br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite" cite>&quot;Since we don't know how to
effectively modify these machines or create new ones just yet, the
trick is to find naturally existing machines that, when combined, can
be steered to actually compute,&quot; he added.<br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite" cite>Writing in the science journal Nature,
Shapiro and his team describe their DNA computer, which is a molecular
model of one of the simplest computing machines -- the automaton which
can answer certain yes or no questions.<br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite" cite>Data is represented by pairs of molecules
on a strand of DNA and two naturally occurring enzymes act as the
hardware to read, copy and manipulate the code.<br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite" cite>When it is all mixed together in the test
tube, the software and hardware operate on the input molecule to
create the output.<br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite" cite>The DNA computer also has a very low
energy consumption, so if it is put inside the cell it would not
require much energy to work.<br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite" cite>DNA computing is a very young branch of
science that started less than a decade ago, when Leonard Adleman of
the University of Southern California pioneered the field by using DNA
in a test tube to solve a mathematical problem.<br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite" cite>Scientists around the globe are now
trying to marry computer technology and biology by using nature's own
design to process information.<br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite" cite><a
href="http://in.news.yahoo.com/011121/107/199x5.html"
>http://in.news.yahoo.com/011121/107/199x5.html</a><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite" cite><br></blockquote>
<div><br></div>
<div><br></div>
<x-sigsep><pre>-- 
</pre></x-sigsep>
</body>
</html>

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Fri Nov 23 09:32:20 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id JAA12524;
	Fri, 23 Nov 2001 09:29:01 -0800
Resent-Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2001 09:29:01 -0800
Message-ID: <3BFE8742.57D9DC57 ix.netcom.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2001 09:28:34 -0800
From: Akira Kawasaki <aki ix.netcom.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en]C-CCK-MCD NSCPCD472  (Win95; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Vortex <vortex-l eskimo.com>
Subject: [Fwd: What's New for Nov 23, 2001]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Resent-Message-ID: <"0zJ_G.0.c33.TTe_x" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45360
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: RO
X-Status: 



-------- Original Message --------
Subject: What's New for Nov 23, 2001
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2001 08:07:25 -0500 (EST)
From: "What's New" <whatsnew aps.org>
To: aki ix.netcom.com

WHAT'S NEW   Robert L. Park   Friday, 23 Nov 01   Washington, DC

1. MISSILE DEFENSE: THERE MAY BE A PROBLEM WITH EARLY DEPLOYMENT.
The space-based infrared systems that are supposed to detect the
launch of missiles aimed at the U.S., currently under development
by Lockheed, are over cost and three years behind schedule.  The
interceptor made by Raytheon and the booster rocket developed by
Boeing both have problems.  According to the Wall Street Journal, 
a Ballistic Missile Defense Organization spokesman shrugged that,
"We'll make do with what we have."  Meanwhile, officials from the
Air Force and Lockheed are said to be looking at "restructuring
the contract" to make sure Lockheed doesn't lose any money.

2. REMOTE VIEWING: OSAMA BIN LADEN CAN RUN, BUT HE CAN'T HIDE. 
According to The Sunday Times (UK), investigators at the FBI and
CIA were told to "think outside the box in tracking down Bin
Laden".  They did.  They reactivated the CIA's "remote viewing"
program, which was abandoned as useless in 1995 after 20 years(WN
1 Dec 95).  At one point during the cold war, the viewers were
asked to help locate Soviet nuclear subs.  They could see them in
the water, but couldn't tell which ocean.  Nor were they ever
quite able to read documents they said they could see on Kremlin
desks.  What would you bet they can see Bin Laden in a cave?

3. SELF-CARE: THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION PICKS A NEW CHIEF.
Michael Maves previously headed the Consumer Healthcare Products
Association, a lobbying organization for nonprescription medicine
and dietary supplement producers.  That a long-time lobbyist for
the self-care industry should be picked to head the organization
of those who write the prescriptions is a major irony.  

4. THE WAR ON TERRORISM: THE HOUSE TAKES STRONG ACTION.  The
House has passed a resolution expressing the sense of Congress
that, during this time of struggle against the forces of
international terrorism, sufficient time should be set aside by
schools to allow children to pray for the Nation.           

5. MASS MEDIA FELLOWSHIPS: APPLICATIONS INVITED FOR SUMMER 2002.
The public must know we live in an orderly universe governed by
natural laws that cannot be circumvented by cleverness or piety. 
To this end, APS supports a ten-week summer fellowship to allow
physics students to work full-time as reporters, researchers or
production assistants in a mass media organization.  Priority
will be given to graduate students in physics or closely related
fields.  The deadline is 15 January 2002.  Details at
http://www.aps.org/public_affairs/Media.html 

6. NASA: MAYBE DAN DOESN'T READ WHAT'S NEW?  Dan Goldin just sent
me an American flag that's been on the ISS, to thank me for all
my help.  Maybe my writing isn't clear enough.

THE AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY and THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND.
Opinions are the author's and are not necessarily shared by the
American Physical Society or the University, but they should be.

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Fri Nov 23 18:19:21 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id SAA22793;
	Fri, 23 Nov 2001 18:16:25 -0800
Resent-Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2001 18:16:25 -0800
Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.20011123200948.00aded80 pop.mail.yahoo.com>
X-Sender: cjford1 pop.mail.yahoo.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58 
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2001 20:17:03 +0000
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
From: Charles Ford <cjford1 yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Fwd: [svpvril] Scientists build tiny computer from DNA
In-Reply-To: <a05100300b82392c4d92d [4.46.76.70]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Resent-Message-ID: <"i9Bc6.0.3a5.uBm_x" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45361
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

At 12:34 AM 11/23/01 -0600, you wrote:


>>Scientists build tiny computer from DNA
>>LONDON (Reuters) - Following Mother Nature's lead, Israeli scientists 
>>have built a DNA computer so tiny that a trillion of them could fit in a 
>>test tube and perform a billion operations per second with 99.8 percent 
>>accuracy.


Um.. correct me if I am wrong...   Is that about twenty million errors a 
second?  Impressive ;-)

Sort of like running Windows!



_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free  yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Fri Nov 23 18:33:08 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id SAA28318;
	Fri, 23 Nov 2001 18:32:22 -0800
Resent-Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2001 18:32:22 -0800
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20011124033152.02ef2708 pop3.wp.pl>
X-Sender: blutransform pop3.wp.pl
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2001 03:32:18 +0100
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
From: Horace <blutransform wp.pl>
Subject: Re: Fwd: [svpvril] Scientists build tiny computer from DNA
In-Reply-To: <4.2.0.58.20011123200948.00aded80 pop.mail.yahoo.com>
References: <a05100300b82392c4d92d [4.46.76.70]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Resent-Message-ID: <"dh03U1.0.Jw6.rQm_x" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45362
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 


Only two million errors per second ;)

At 21:17 2001-11-23, you wrote:
>At 12:34 AM 11/23/01 -0600, you wrote:
>
>
>>>Scientists build tiny computer from DNA
>>>LONDON (Reuters) - Following Mother Nature's lead, Israeli scientists have built a DNA computer so tiny that a trillion of them could fit in a test tube and perform a billion operations per second with 99.8 percent accuracy.
>
>
>Um.. correct me if I am wrong...   Is that about twenty million errors a second?  Impressive ;-)
>
>Sort of like running Windows!
>
>
>
>_________________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Get your free  yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
>

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Fri Nov 23 19:03:47 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id TAA05033;
	Fri, 23 Nov 2001 19:00:58 -0800
Resent-Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2001 19:00:58 -0800
X-Sender: rmuha mail
Message-Id: <v03110701b824bd53f3d8 [206.243.174.23]>
In-Reply-To: <a05100300b82392c4d92d [4.46.76.70]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2001 22:00:53 -0500
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
From: ralph muha <rmuha minimal.com>
Subject: BBC News | SCI/TECH | Particle physics telescope explodes
Resent-Message-ID: <"C3jwX.0.ZE1.frm_x" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45363
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: RO
X-Status: 

http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/sci/tech/newsid_1664000/1664447.stm

Monday, 19 November, 2001, 12:49 GMT
Particle physics telescope explodes
By BBC News Online science editor Dr David Whitehouse

One of the world's leading particle physics instruments has been
severely damaged in an accident.

The underground Super-Kamiokande Observatory in Japan detects elusive
neutrino particles from space by using photomultiplier tubes to register
the flashes of light they produce when they pass through a huge tank of
water.

On 12 November, one of the photomultiplier tubes exploded causing a
chain reaction that resulted in most of the other 11,200 light detectors
also blowing up.

Scientists say the accident is a major setback, as Super-Kamiokande has
produced spectacular results, helping to answer long-standing questions
about the Universe. Super-Kamiokande was the very first detector to
establish that neutrinos can change into different types.

It was also one of the first detectors to help establish a mass for
neutrinos.

'We will rebuild the detector'

Officials are still trying to determine what happened, and why the
explosion of a single photomultiplier tube should have resulted in the
destruction of most of the rest.

One British physicist told BBC News Online that he was puzzled why a
single event could have such devastating consequences. "Questions should
be asked," he said.

Commenting on the disaster the director of the observatory, Yoji
Totsuka, said: "As a director of the Kamioka Observatory, which owns and
is responsible to operate and maintain the Super-Kamiokande detector, it
is really sad that I have to announce the severe accident that occurred
on 12 November and damaged the significant part of the detector."

He added: "We will rebuild the detector. There is no question."

Big task

Koichiro Nishikawa, a spokesman for the K2K experiment, which uses the
observatory, has released another statement.

He said: "On behalf of the K2K experiment, I thank all the concern
expressed on the accident at Super-Kamiokande. K2K will fully support
the Kamioka Observatory and will put the first priority on the recovery
of Super-Kamiokande as early as possible."

Technically it is not very difficult to repair the detector but
logistically it is a major problem.

50,000 tonnes of super-pure water will have to be pumped out and the
debris from the shattered tubes removed. Then thousands of new detectors
will have to be fitted and tested, and then the water replaced.

The telescope will be rebuilt

It is a task that will take at least a year. Officials say that they
will take the opportunity to modify the detector, in particular to
reduce the number of the photomultiplier tubes by about a half.

They say this will not affect the detector's performance and will make
another mishap less likely.

The observatory achieved a major goal in 1998 when it found evidence
that neutrinos can change from one type into another on their way
through the Earth.

The main emphasis recently has been to study this phenomenon with
neutrinos produced by an accelerator at the KEK laboratory, 250
kilometres from the Kamioka Observatory and beamed through the Earth
towards it (hence the name K2K for the experiment).

The aim will be to resume this experiment as soon as possible, possibly
within a year.


From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Fri Nov 23 19:21:15 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id TAA11848;
	Fri, 23 Nov 2001 19:20:25 -0800
Resent-Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2001 19:20:25 -0800
Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.20011123212003.00b30bc0 pop.mail.yahoo.com>
X-Sender: cjford1 pop.mail.yahoo.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58 
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2001 21:21:03 +0000
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
From: Charles Ford <cjford1 yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Fwd: [svpvril] Scientists build tiny computer from DNA
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20011124033152.02ef2708 pop3.wp.pl>
References: <4.2.0.58.20011123200948.00aded80 pop.mail.yahoo.com>
 <a05100300b82392c4d92d [4.46.76.70]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Resent-Message-ID: <"YS3761.0.xu2.u7n_x" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45364
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

Serves me right for learning to use a slide rule :-)

At 03:32 AM 11/24/01 +0100, you wrote:

>Only two million errors per second ;)
>
>At 21:17 2001-11-23, you wrote:
> >At 12:34 AM 11/23/01 -0600, you wrote:
> >
> >
> >>>Scientists build tiny computer from DNA
> >>>LONDON (Reuters) - Following Mother Nature's lead, Israeli scientists 
> have built a DNA computer so tiny that a trillion of them could fit in a 
> test tube and perform a billion operations per second with 99.8 percent 
> accuracy.
> >
> >
> >Um.. correct me if I am wrong...   Is that about twenty million errors a 
> second?  Impressive ;-)
> >
> >Sort of like running Windows!
> >
> >
> >
> >_________________________________________________________
> >Do You Yahoo!?
> >Get your free  yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
> >



_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free  yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Sat Nov 24 11:21:28 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id LAA12355;
	Sat, 24 Nov 2001 11:18:40 -0800
Resent-Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2001 11:18:40 -0800
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Sender: rick mail.highsurf.com
Message-Id: <v04210105b825a29c367c [192.168.123.2]>
In-Reply-To: <a05100305b821dcc6f4fd [4.46.76.70]>
References: <a05100305b821dcc6f4fd [4.46.76.70]>
Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2001 09:17:39 -1000
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
From: Rick Monteverde <rick highsurf.com>
Subject: Re: Your opinions please
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
Resent-Message-ID: <"WNYtH.0.v03.FA__x" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45365
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: RO
X-Status: 

Yup, here's the probable cause:

"...alterations to cerebration systems..."

But where's the web site where all is revealed?

- Rick Monteverde
Honolulu, HI

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Sat Nov 24 15:38:22 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id PAA19836;
	Sat, 24 Nov 2001 15:35:13 -0800
Resent-Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2001 15:35:13 -0800
From: Robin van Spaandonk <rvanspaa bigpond.net.au>
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Re: A question of integrity
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2001 10:34:33 +1100
Organization: Improving
Message-ID: <3ib00uobki60v7ckh2m206j6jgvio28cm5 4ax.com>
References: <3BFBDFEB.CB58CCFC ix.netcom.com> <3bfc349a.337546315@mail.midiowa.net> <050301c172e4$4d12eb40$6401a8c0@cs910664a> <3bfe597f.346991206@mail.midiowa.net> <3BFD5C47.9860FFEF@ix.netcom.com>
In-Reply-To: <3BFD5C47.9860FFEF ix.netcom.com>
X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.553
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id PAA19796
Resent-Message-ID: <"NcApP1.0.sr4.nw20y" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45366
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: RO
X-Status: 

In reply to  Edmund Storms's message of Thu, 22 Nov 2001 14:13:22 -0600:
[snip]
>> There are also underwater "cities" offshore from India and other
>> places.
[snip]
Which might explain the various "flood" stories that crop up in many
cultures.

Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/

....Put the "bottom line" at the top!

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Sat Nov 24 15:57:22 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id PAA27851;
	Sat, 24 Nov 2001 15:56:37 -0800
Resent-Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2001 15:56:37 -0800
From: Robin van Spaandonk <rvanspaa bigpond.net.au>
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Re: A question of integrity
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2001 10:55:58 +1100
Organization: Improving
Message-ID: <jnb00uokfpa10ac0o7db2g54ta0gh0fbd4 4ax.com>
References: <bc2ovtc65ptp6uh64ibp0lu9q4ppfj5t1u 4ax.com> <Pine.SUN.3.96.1011122141719.29937A-100000@eskimo.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.96.1011122141719.29937A-100000 eskimo.com>
X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.553
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id PAA27809
Resent-Message-ID: <"bXFBs3.0.5p6.qE30y" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45367
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: RO
X-Status: 

In reply to  Stephen Lajoie's message of Thu, 22 Nov 2001 14:24:41
-0800:

>On Thu, 22 Nov 2001, Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
>
>> Unfortunately the science of physics is even worse off. It has been on
>> the wrong course for almost a hundred years.
>
>You need to elaborate on that. 

Yes, I was going out on a limb a bit, and I thought someone would call
me on it. :)

>
>I don't see a problem with science, I see a problem with people getting
>degrees that either give lip service to the principles of science or don't
>even know what the principles of science ARE. "Science" is not taught as a
>way to know the world, but as a collection of facts handed down to us by
>"scientists". Isn't that the theme of Dr. Storms' post? I don't think he
>meant to say that physics has been on the wrong course.

I don't think he meant that either, but I did mean that.
I agree with the rest of your statement above, with the proviso, that by
science you mean the scientific method. There is nothing wrong with the
method, it's just the execution that gets all messed up.
 
>
>
>> A few sporadic individuals
>> are breaking with the consensus, but it will be a decade at least before
>> the whole house of cards comes tumbling down.
>
>What house of cards?

The standard model of physics, QM, the big bang, the nature of the
vacuum, the red shift, Hubble constant, etc. etc.

>
>
>> Both relativity and QM are based on false assumptions (though near
>> enough to correct to yield valid results in most cases).
>
>I don't think so. Please give specific examples. Relativity and QM have
>been very successful theories in that you can use them to make accurate
>predictions. The standard theory even more so. If the assumptions are
>false, then what errors are they causing?

The first false assumption is that the speed of information transmission
is limited to the speed of transmission of transverse electromagnetic
waves.
(Implicit herein the assumption that this is the only possible means of
transferring information).
The link between gravity, the vacuum  and EM is not yet clear (at least
where public knowledge is concerned), this points to major gaps in our
understanding of nature.

>
>> The implication of this is that almost everyone is prepared to follow
>> the status quo rather than the scientific method.
>
>You observe, you form a theory, and then you test the theory to make
>predictions, and see if the predictions are correct. 

Yes, that's the method.

>The predictions are
>correct. 

I think close examination will reveal that the predictions frequently
are not correct, and that some form of correction or adjustment of the
formulae based on actual results is needed in order to get "the right
answer".

>How is SR/GR & QM not following the scientific method?

Theories don't follow a method, people do (or don't, as the case may
be).

One of the primary problems with the standard theory IMO, is the
assumption that the electron is a point particle.
This is what gives rise to some of the infinities that Dirac pointed out
were being ignored because they were inconvenient.

>
>Happy Thanksgiving!
>
We don't have Thanksgiving in Australia ;)


Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/

....Put the "bottom line" at the top!

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Sat Nov 24 23:41:15 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id XAA13718;
	Sat, 24 Nov 2001 23:37:59 -0800
Resent-Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2001 23:37:59 -0800
X-Authentication-Warning: eskimo.com: lajoie owned process doing -bs
Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2001 23:37:57 -0800 (PST)
From: Stephen Lajoie <lajoie eskimo.com>
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Re: A question of integrity
In-Reply-To: <jnb00uokfpa10ac0o7db2g54ta0gh0fbd4 4ax.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.96.1011124232711.20685A-100000 eskimo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Resent-Message-ID: <"Vke973.0.CM3.M_90y" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45368
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: RO
X-Status: 

On Sun, 25 Nov 2001, Robin van Spaandonk wrote:

> In reply to  Stephen Lajoie's message of Thu, 22 Nov 2001 14:24:41
> -0800:
> >
> >> A few sporadic individuals
> >> are breaking with the consensus, but it will be a decade at least before
> >> the whole house of cards comes tumbling down.
> >
> >What house of cards?
> 
> The standard model of physics, QM, the big bang, the nature of the
> vacuum, the red shift, Hubble constant, etc. etc.
> 
> >
> >
> >> Both relativity and QM are based on false assumptions (though near
> >> enough to correct to yield valid results in most cases).
> >
> >I don't think so. Please give specific examples. Relativity and QM have
> >been very successful theories in that you can use them to make accurate
> >predictions. The standard theory even more so. If the assumptions are
> >false, then what errors are they causing?
> 
> The first false assumption is that the speed of information transmission
> is limited to the speed of transmission of transverse electromagnetic
> waves.

That is not an assumption, but is derived. The experimental observation is
that all observers will measure the speed of light to be the same
regardless of the speed of the observer. There is no assumption involved,
unless the observation itself is considered the assumption.

> (Implicit herein the assumption that this is the only possible means of
> transferring information).

I can't think of any way to move information besides EM. Even driving mass
is electromagnetic at the atomic level. What other possible ways are
there if energy or mass is not involved?

> The link between gravity, the vacuum  and EM is not yet clear (at least
> where public knowledge is concerned), this points to major gaps in our
> understanding of nature.

You point out that our knowledge is incomplete, and then you conclude that
SR/GR is wrong? It's a theory, we can assume it's wrong. We can conclude
that everything we know is in some measure wrong. Theories are, however,
as good as their predictions, and the predictions of SR and GR are fairly
good on the large scale. It is still the best theory.

> >> The implication of this is that almost everyone is prepared to follow
> >> the status quo rather than the scientific method.
> >
> >You observe, you form a theory, and then you test the theory to make
> >predictions, and see if the predictions are correct. 
> 
> Yes, that's the method.
> 
> >The predictions are
> >correct. 
> 
> I think close examination will reveal that the predictions frequently
> are not correct, and that some form of correction or adjustment of the
> formulae based on actual results is needed in order to get "the right
> answer".

Examples where SR/GR fails are what?

> >How is SR/GR & QM not following the scientific method?
> 
> Theories don't follow a method, people do (or don't, as the case may
> be).

I think there is a conceptual failure here. Good scientist don't "follow"
anything. They use the theory to predict, and are ever hopeful of finding
cases where the predictions fail. Only in finding where the predictions
fail do you find the clues for an improved theory.

> One of the primary problems with the standard theory IMO, is the
> assumption that the electron is a point particle.

I don't think it says that. You take an intergral around the particle and
assume the particle is in the volume. 


> This is what gives rise to some of the infinities that Dirac pointed out
> were being ignored because they were inconvenient.
> 
> >
> >Happy Thanksgiving!
> >
> We don't have Thanksgiving in Australia ;)

Have a happy one anyway. :-) Can't hurt. 

> Regards,
> 
> Robin van Spaandonk
> 
> http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/
> 
> ....Put the "bottom line" at the top!
> 
> 

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Sun Nov 25 17:57:16 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id RAA26113;
	Sun, 25 Nov 2001 17:53:13 -0800
Resent-Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2001 17:53:13 -0800
X-Authentication-Warning: eskimo.com: billb owned process doing -bs
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2001 17:53:10 -0800 (PST)
From: William Beaty <billb eskimo.com>
To: freenrg-l eskimo.com
Subject: Latest email virus plague: badtransB
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.96.1011125174034.8856A-100000 eskimo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Resent-Message-ID: <"brz_W1.0.bN6.82Q0y" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45369
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: RO
X-Status: 


Yeah yeah, we're not supposed to spread warnings about "horrible new
viruses".  But today I received about 20 messages from peoples' infected
computers, and the Norton page says that the new worm was only discovered
yesterday.  It spreads fast because it can use some versions of MS Outlook
to run itself when viewed (without the victim having to open the infected
attachments.)  Looks like another "Sircam"-like plague is about to hit the
fan.  Please update your antivirus files, people.  Or (if you're using
Windows and Outlook) just be very wary of incoming email messages where
the message size is 40K or thereabouts.  See: 

 http://www.sarc.com/avcenter/venc/data/w32.badtrans.b mm.html
 http://vil.nai.com/vil/virusSummary.asp?virus_k=99069
 http://www.sophos.com/virusinfo/analyses/w32badtransb.html

((((((((((((((((((((( ( (  (   (    (O)    )   )  ) ) )))))))))))))))))))))
William J. Beaty                                  SCIENCE HOBBYIST website
billb eskimo.com                                  http://www.amasci.com
EE/programmer/sci-exhibits          science projects, tesla, weird science
Seattle, WA   206-789-0775          freenrg-L taoshum-L vortex-L webhead-L

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Sun Nov 25 21:49:56 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id VAA12161;
	Sun, 25 Nov 2001 21:47:12 -0800
Resent-Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2001 21:47:12 -0800
From: Robin van Spaandonk <rvanspaa bigpond.net.au>
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Re: A question of integrity
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 16:46:35 +1100
Organization: Improving
Message-ID: <2lk30usvt4lpk1g8t7917o37mtq1es1hul 4ax.com>
References: <jnb00uokfpa10ac0o7db2g54ta0gh0fbd4 4ax.com> <Pine.SUN.3.96.1011124232711.20685A-100000@eskimo.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.96.1011124232711.20685A-100000 eskimo.com>
X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.553
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id VAA12134
Resent-Message-ID: <"t_drD3.0.xz2.WTT0y" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45370
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

In reply to  Stephen Lajoie's message of Sat, 24 Nov 2001 23:37:57
-0800:
[snip]
>> The first false assumption is that the speed of information transmission
>> is limited to the speed of transmission of transverse electromagnetic
>> waves.
>
>That is not an assumption, but is derived. 

Einstein assumed the speed of light as the maximum speed at which any
object could travel, when he developed the ST. Since then everyone else
has jumped on the band wagon, and assumed that absolutely nothing could
travel faster than light, including information. There is however some
evidence to suggest that this isn't so.

>The experimental observation is
>that all observers will measure the speed of light to be the same
>regardless of the speed of the observer. There is no assumption involved,
>unless the observation itself is considered the assumption.

How many actual measurements of the speed of light do you know of where
the observer was travelling at a sufficiently significant % of the speed
of light for this to be noticeable?

>
>> (Implicit herein the assumption that this is the only possible means of
>> transferring information).
>
>I can't think of any way to move information besides EM. 

A couple have been patented. Personally, I suspect that a longitudinal
electric wave probably travels considerably faster than light.

>Even driving mass
>is electromagnetic at the atomic level. What other possible ways are
>there if energy or mass is not involved?

See above.

>
>> The link between gravity, the vacuum  and EM is not yet clear (at least
>> where public knowledge is concerned), this points to major gaps in our
>> understanding of nature.
>
>You point out that our knowledge is incomplete, and then you conclude that
>SR/GR is wrong? It's a theory, we can assume it's wrong. 

Isn't that what I said at the beginning?

>We can conclude
>that everything we know is in some measure wrong. Theories are, however,
>as good as their predictions, and the predictions of SR and GR are fairly
>good on the large scale. It is still the best theory.

It is still a fairly good theory. There are a couple of others that I
would give the time day.
[snip]
>> I think close examination will reveal that the predictions frequently
>> are not correct, and that some form of correction or adjustment of the
>> formulae based on actual results is needed in order to get "the right
>> answer".
>
>Examples where SR/GR fails are what?

See Infinite Energy Vol. 7 Issue 38, 2001 (the whole issue).
IMO there is no such thing as a singularity. Also, I think that
eventually they will be forced to admit that the concept of
"entanglement" is utter rubbish.

>
>> >How is SR/GR & QM not following the scientific method?
>> 
>> Theories don't follow a method, people do (or don't, as the case may
>> be).
>
>I think there is a conceptual failure here. Good scientist don't "follow"
>anything. They use the theory to predict, and are ever hopeful of finding
>cases where the predictions fail. Only in finding where the predictions
>fail do you find the clues for an improved theory.

Yes, but many are not good scientists.

>
>> One of the primary problems with the standard theory IMO, is the
>> assumption that the electron is a point particle.
>
>I don't think it says that. You take an intergral around the particle and
>assume the particle is in the volume. 

Try convincing PZ that it isn't a point particle :)
[snip]

Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/

....Put the "bottom line" at the top!

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Mon Nov 26 07:47:47 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id HAA14274;
	Mon, 26 Nov 2001 07:46:47 -0800
Resent-Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 07:46:47 -0800
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20011126104613.02794818 pop.mindspring.com>
X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 10:46:39 -0500
To: vortex-L eskimo.com
From: Jed Rothwell <jedrothwell infinite-energy.com>
Subject: ICCF-9 web site
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Resent-Message-ID: <"5zvjR2.0.sU3.cFc0y" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45372
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

See:

http://iccf9.global.tsinghua.edu.cn

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Mon Nov 26 07:48:53 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id HAA13468;
	Mon, 26 Nov 2001 07:45:37 -0800
Resent-Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 07:45:37 -0800
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20011126103803.03851520 pop.mindspring.com>
X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 10:44:11 -0500
To: vortex-l eskimo.com, vortex-l@eskimo.com
From: Jed Rothwell <jedrothwell infinite-energy.com>
Subject: Re: BBC News | SCI/TECH | Particle physics telescope explodes
In-Reply-To: <v03110701b824bd53f3d8 [206.243.174.23]>
References: <a05100300b82392c4d92d [4.46.76.70]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Resent-Message-ID: <"ZzOEp3.0.KI3.WEc0y" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45371
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

ralph muha wrote:

Particle physics telescope explodes
>By BBC News Online science editor Dr David Whitehouse
>
>One of the world's leading particle physics instruments has been
>severely damaged in an accident.
>
>The underground Super-Kamiokande Observatory in Japan detects elusive 
>neutrino particles from space . . .

This was front page news in Japan, although I have not seen much follow up. 
I did not get a chance to report it here.

The Kamiokande Observatory played a role in the early history of cold 
fusion. Steve Jones botched an experiment there. There was some evidence of 
neutrons from the experiment despite his amateur mistakes.


>On 12 November, one of the photomultiplier tubes exploded causing a
>chain reaction that resulted in most of the other 11,200 light detectors
>also blowing up.

It sounds like the Bad Guy Secret Headquarters in a James Bond movie. You 
press one button, trigger a chain reaction, and the whole place collapses 
like a house of cards. I have heard that some large scientific experimental 
apparatuses work badly because they are designed by theoreticians instead 
of engineers.

- Jed

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Mon Nov 26 08:47:59 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id IAA18925;
	Mon, 26 Nov 2001 08:45:10 -0800
Resent-Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 08:45:10 -0800
X-Authentication-Warning: eskimo.com: lajoie owned process doing -bs
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 08:45:05 -0800 (PST)
From: Stephen Lajoie <lajoie eskimo.com>
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Re: BBC News | SCI/TECH | Particle physics telescope explodes
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20011126103803.03851520 pop.mindspring.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.96.1011126084212.18290A-100000 eskimo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Resent-Message-ID: <"pqZEX1.0.dd4.M6d0y" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45373
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

On Mon, 26 Nov 2001, Jed Rothwell wrote:

> ralph muha wrote:
> 
> Particle physics telescope explodes
> >By BBC News Online science editor Dr David Whitehouse
> >
> >One of the world's leading particle physics instruments has been
> >severely damaged in an accident.
> >
> >The underground Super-Kamiokande Observatory in Japan detects elusive 
> >neutrino particles from space . . .
> 
> This was front page news in Japan, although I have not seen much follow up. 
> I did not get a chance to report it here.
> 
> The Kamiokande Observatory played a role in the early history of cold 
> fusion. Steve Jones botched an experiment there. There was some evidence of 
> neutrons from the experiment despite his amateur mistakes.

You guys talking about this?
http://www.phys.washington.edu/~jeff/courses/588A/skstatus-011116/
 

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Mon Nov 26 08:52:48 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id IAA22217;
	Mon, 26 Nov 2001 08:51:39 -0800
Resent-Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 08:51:39 -0800
X-Authentication-Warning: eskimo.com: lajoie owned process doing -bs
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 08:51:36 -0800 (PST)
From: Stephen Lajoie <lajoie eskimo.com>
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Re: Latest email virus plague: badtransB
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.96.1011125174034.8856A-100000 eskimo.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.96.1011126084549.18290B-100000 eskimo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Resent-Message-ID: <"w6Yol.0._Q5.QCd0y" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45374
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

On Sun, 25 Nov 2001, William Beaty wrote:

 
>  It spreads fast because it can use some versions of MS Outlook
> to run itself when viewed (without the victim having to open the infected
> attachments.)

I've had it with Micorsoft. Unix had anticipated and worked out the
problems with this, and Microsoft went ahead and made a virus enhanced
operating system. They can't say they didn't know, they knew about Unix.
It appears their motivation was to make it possible to force unwanted
advertising on the computer user.

When are people going to wake up and switch to linux? I have my system on
dual boot; unfortunatly, I need Windows for Mathcad and similar programs.
I'm not buying that Windows XP, that's just gasoline on the fire.


From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Mon Nov 26 11:15:26 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id LAA16658;
	Mon, 26 Nov 2001 11:12:34 -0800
Resent-Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 11:12:34 -0800
X-Authentication-Warning: eskimo.com: lajoie owned process doing -bs
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 11:12:25 -0800 (PST)
From: Stephen Lajoie <lajoie eskimo.com>
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Re: A question of integrity
In-Reply-To: <2lk30usvt4lpk1g8t7917o37mtq1es1hul 4ax.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.96.1011126105105.29753B-100000 eskimo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Resent-Message-ID: <"GrmjI.0.C44.YGf0y" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45375
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

On Mon, 26 Nov 2001, Robin van Spaandonk wrote:

> In reply to  Stephen Lajoie's message of Sat, 24 Nov 2001 23:37:57
> -0800:
> [snip]
> >> The first false assumption is that the speed of information transmission
> >> is limited to the speed of transmission of transverse electromagnetic
> >> waves.
> >
> >That is not an assumption, but is derived. 
> 
> Einstein assumed the speed of light as the maximum speed at which any
> object could travel,

He didn't assume that. He took the MM experiment at face value in that it
indicated that an observer in motion would measure the speed of light to
be the same regardless of his velocity. From that, he was able to derive
that no mass or energy could move faster than light. The derivation
involved showing that it would require infinate energy (not the magazine)
to reach the speed of light. 

> when he developed the ST. Since then everyone else
> has jumped on the band wagon, and assumed that absolutely nothing could
> travel faster than light, including information. There is however some
> evidence to suggest that this isn't so.

Again, there was no assumption. The information clause was supportive of
the limit on speed of mass and energy and was consistant with causality. 
 
> >The experimental observation is
> >that all observers will measure the speed of light to be the same
> >regardless of the speed of the observer. There is no assumption involved,
> >unless the observation itself is considered the assumption.
> 
> How many actual measurements of the speed of light do you know of where
> the observer was travelling at a sufficiently significant % of the speed
> of light for this to be noticeable?

The Michelson Morely experiment has been repeated many times. The whole
point of the experiment is that it can detect such differences. Yes, it is
noticeable. 

> >> (Implicit herein the assumption that this is the only possible means of
> >> transferring information).
> >
> >I can't think of any way to move information besides EM. 
> 
> A couple have been patented. Personally, I suspect that a longitudinal
> electric wave probably travels considerably faster than light.

Perhaps I suspect that it doesn't. 

> >Even driving mass
> >is electromagnetic at the atomic level. What other possible ways are
> >there if energy or mass is not involved?
> 
> See above.
> 
> >
> >> The link between gravity, the vacuum  and EM is not yet clear (at least
> >> where public knowledge is concerned), this points to major gaps in our
> >> understanding of nature.
> >
> >You point out that our knowledge is incomplete, and then you conclude that
> >SR/GR is wrong? It's a theory, we can assume it's wrong. 
> 
> Isn't that what I said at the beginning?

You said it was a house of cards. It appears to be a well thought out and
tested theory, with few problems in it's predictions. 
 
> >We can conclude
> >that everything we know is in some measure wrong. Theories are, however,
> >as good as their predictions, and the predictions of SR and GR are fairly
> >good on the large scale. It is still the best theory.
> 
> It is still a fairly good theory. There are a couple of others that I
> would give the time day.

?!?

> [snip]
> >> I think close examination will reveal that the predictions frequently
> >> are not correct, and that some form of correction or adjustment of the
> >> formulae based on actual results is needed in order to get "the right
> >> answer".
> >
> >Examples where SR/GR fails are what?
> 
> See Infinite Energy Vol. 7 Issue 38, 2001 (the whole issue).
> IMO there is no such thing as a singularity. Also, I think that
> eventually they will be forced to admit that the concept of
> "entanglement" is utter rubbish.
 
E&M, and therefore relativity, do not assume a point particle. They use a
guassian surface and state that the particle is in the surface somewhere. 
It is pointed out that if you do assume a point particle, that you get
garbage for the energy of the electric field.

I don't know of any theory which assumes a point particle or allows a
signularity. Point particles and sigularities are often conceptual
approximations to a problem in order to simplify, but are not essential to
the theory itself.

I have not studied entanglement and thus, will not comment on it. 

I don't receive Infinite Energy anymore. While cold fusion does stand up
to scrutiny under the scientific method, many of the articles in IE did
not. The fact that there exist a P&F effect does not mean that every claim
of Cold fusion is valid, nor does it open the flood gates for every claim
of something new. 


> >> >How is SR/GR & QM not following the scientific method?
> >> 
> >> Theories don't follow a method, people do (or don't, as the case may
> >> be).
> >
> >I think there is a conceptual failure here. Good scientist don't "follow"
> >anything. They use the theory to predict, and are ever hopeful of finding
> >cases where the predictions fail. Only in finding where the predictions
> >fail do you find the clues for an improved theory.
> 
> Yes, but many are not good scientists.

I've no dispute with that. Some people are very skilled at what they do,
and in their narrow field, are quite expert. I would point out that many
people who become scientist make the mistake of not distinguishing between
their scientific findings from their personal opinions, and expect their
personal opinions to carry the weight of their findings. 

Putting on my engineering hat, I know the importance of not venturing a
personal opinion as fact. While scientist can do so with near impunity,
engineers can be sued for passing off opinion as engineering. (If they are
a PE)

> >> One of the primary problems with the standard theory IMO, is the
> >> assumption that the electron is a point particle.
> >
> >I don't think it says that. You take an intergral around the particle and
> >assume the particle is in the volume. 
> 
> Try convincing PZ that it isn't a point particle :)

Who is PZ?

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Mon Nov 26 11:47:15 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id LAA08437;
	Mon, 26 Nov 2001 11:44:06 -0800
Resent-Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 11:44:06 -0800
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20011126143252.00ab58d0 pop.mindspring.com>
X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 14:43:54 -0500
To: vortex-l eskimo.com, vortex-l@eskimo.com
From: Jed Rothwell <jedrothwell infinite-energy.com>
Subject: Re: A question of integrity
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.96.1011126105105.29753B-100000 eskimo.com>
References: <2lk30usvt4lpk1g8t7917o37mtq1es1hul 4ax.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Resent-Message-ID: <"7WzGU3.0.l32.5kf0y" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45376
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

Stephen Lajoie wrote:

>The Michelson Morely experiment has been repeated many times. The whole 
>point of the experiment is that it can detect such differences. Yes, it is 
>noticeable.

I expect the M&M results were correct, and special relativity has been 
confirmed by several other methods, but in point of fact this experiment 
was NOT repeated many times. It was repeated only once, as far as I know, 
by Dayton Miller in the early 1920s, who used a much better apparatus. His 
experiment won the 1925 AAAS national prize in physics. It contradicted 
M&M's result. Miller observed clear evidence that there is a difference in 
the speed of light from different stars, in a good fit with the aether wind 
hypothesis. Einstein and others agreed this was a good experiment. However, 
special relativity became popular, and very useful as a tool. Other 
evidence for the theory accumulated. Gradually, the Miller research was 
forgotten. In 1955 a team re-analyzed Miller's results and came to the 
tentative conclusion that his apparatus was affected by temperature.

This is described in H. Collins, T. Pinch, "The Golem," p. 39 - 43. If this 
account is correct, I would say this aspect of the theory remains unsettled.

- Jed

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Mon Nov 26 12:40:22 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id MAA15507;
	Mon, 26 Nov 2001 12:37:37 -0800
Resent-Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 12:37:37 -0800
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20011126204008.0302b0d8 pop3.wp.pl>
X-Sender: blutransform pop3.wp.pl
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 20:43:03 +0100
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
From: Horace <blutransform wp.pl>
Subject: Re: Latest email virus plague: badtransB
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.96.1011126084549.18290B-100000 eskimo.com>
References: <Pine.SUN.3.96.1011125174034.8856A-100000 eskimo.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Resent-Message-ID: <"4e6bs.0.Do3.GWg0y" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45377
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: RO
X-Status: 


After reading the following article, more of us might join the club of Stephen Lajoie...

<http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A1436-2001Nov22.html>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A1436-2001Nov22.html 


At 17:51 2001-11-26, Stephen Lajoie you wrote:
>On Sun, 25 Nov 2001, William Beaty wrote:
>
> 
>>  It spreads fast because it can use some versions of MS Outlook
>> to run itself when viewed (without the victim having to open the infected
>> attachments.)
>
>I've had it with Micorsoft. Unix had anticipated and worked out the
>problems with this, and Microsoft went ahead and made a virus enhanced
>operating system. They can't say they didn't know, they knew about Unix.
>It appears their motivation was to make it possible to force unwanted
>advertising on the computer user.
>
>When are people going to wake up and switch to linux? I have my system on
>dual boot; unfortunatly, I need Windows for Mathcad and similar programs.
>I'm not buying that Windows XP, that's just gasoline on the fire.

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Mon Nov 26 13:10:46 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id NAA05613;
	Mon, 26 Nov 2001 13:07:49 -0800
Resent-Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 13:07:49 -0800
X-Authentication-Warning: eskimo.com: lajoie owned process doing -bs
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 13:07:44 -0800 (PST)
From: Stephen Lajoie <lajoie eskimo.com>
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Re: A question of integrity
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20011126143252.00ab58d0 pop.mindspring.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.96.1011126130557.12450A-100000 eskimo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Resent-Message-ID: <"33Kjq1.0.XN1.ayg0y" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45378
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

On Mon, 26 Nov 2001, Jed Rothwell wrote:

> Stephen Lajoie wrote:
> 
> >The Michelson Morely experiment has been repeated many times. The whole 
> >point of the experiment is that it can detect such differences. Yes, it is 
> >noticeable.
> 
> I expect the M&M results were correct, and special relativity has been 
> confirmed by several other methods, but in point of fact this experiment 
> was NOT repeated many times. It was repeated only once, as far as I know, 
> by Dayton Miller in the early 1920s, who used a much better apparatus. His 

http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/RelWWW/tests.html

Also, I believe you will find that many of the laser gyro's wouldn't work
if the speed of light was not constant. 


> experiment won the 1925 AAAS national prize in physics. It contradicted 
> M&M's result. Miller observed clear evidence that there is a difference in 
> the speed of light from different stars, in a good fit with the aether wind 
> hypothesis. Einstein and others agreed this was a good experiment. However, 
> special relativity became popular, and very useful as a tool. Other 
> evidence for the theory accumulated. Gradually, the Miller research was 
> forgotten. In 1955 a team re-analyzed Miller's results and came to the 
> tentative conclusion that his apparatus was affected by temperature.

Yes. So why even bring it up?
 
> This is described in H. Collins, T. Pinch, "The Golem," p. 39 - 43. If this 
> account is correct, I would say this aspect of the theory remains unsettled.
> 
> - Jed
> 
> 

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Mon Nov 26 14:05:16 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id NAA10604;
	Mon, 26 Nov 2001 13:59:44 -0800
Resent-Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 13:59:44 -0800
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20011126163222.038389a0 pop.mindspring.com>
X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 16:59:39 -0500
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
From: Jed Rothwell <jedrothwell infinite-energy.com>
Subject: Re: A question of integrity
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.96.1011126130557.12450A-100000 eskimo.com>
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20011126143252.00ab58d0 pop.mindspring.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Resent-Message-ID: <"IsRsW1.0.cb2.Gjh0y" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45379
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

Stephen Lajoie wrote:

> > . . . In 1955 a team re-analyzed Miller's results and came to the
> > tentative conclusion that his apparatus was affected by temperature.
>
>Yes. So why even bring it up?

Two reasons:

1. You wrote, "the Michelson Morely experiment has been repeated many 
times." As far as I know, it was only repeated once, not many times, and 
the results contradicted special relativity. Do you know of other 
repetitions? Later tests with masers and lasers may not address the issue, 
because the light does not originate in distant stars. Apparently there 
were some tests with other techniques, but in 1933 Miller pointed out the 
differences and errors in these techniques and showed that they should not 
have worked, according to the aether hypothesis.

2. An analysis performed by other scientists 30 years after the original 
work hardly qualifies as strong evidence either way. At best, we can say 
the question is still open, and Miller did not definitively disprove this 
aspect of special relativity. He surely did weaken it, and no one, as yet, 
has repaired the damage.

More to the point, did these other scientists examine or retest the actual 
apparatus? Did it exist, and was it in working order? Did they subject it 
to temperature differences, observe an error, then remove the differences 
and measure stellar light again? I do not know, but given the circumstances 
I suppose they performed only a "paper analysis" -- a.k.a. glorified 
guesswork. It would take years to really prove the temperature hypothesis. 
I put little stock in "paper" explorations. The laboratory is the only 
place where a scientific question is truly answered. People have often done 
paper analyses looking for errors in cold fusion. They always find errors, 
but such analyses have no merit, and can safely be ignored. I do not know 
of a single instance in which significant flaws -- or important new 
positive information -- was revealed years after a CF experiment by someone 
from outside the lab.

In other cases, experiments in progress have been critiqued by 
knowledgeable, experienced experimentalists, and interesting questions 
asked, which resulted in better revised papers and improved experiments. I 
know this occurs because I have seen it happen, and occasionally even 
mediated the exchange and suggested ways to rewrite the papers.

Melich & Hansen worked years after the experiment ended, analyzing the 
Harwell data, and they revealed very important new facts about it. But they 
went into the lab. (Literally -- they went to the U.K. and visited the 
lab.) The researchers cooperated with them completely, showing them the 
complete old data sets and instruments.

- Jed

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Mon Nov 26 14:39:47 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id OAA00751;
	Mon, 26 Nov 2001 14:33:08 -0800
Resent-Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 14:33:08 -0800
X-Authentication-Warning: eskimo.com: lajoie owned process doing -bs
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 14:33:06 -0800 (PST)
From: Stephen Lajoie <lajoie eskimo.com>
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Re: A question of integrity
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20011126163222.038389a0 pop.mindspring.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.96.1011126142800.19169A-100000 eskimo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Resent-Message-ID: <"9ztQs.0.fB.ZCi0y" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45380
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

On Mon, 26 Nov 2001, Jed Rothwell wrote:

> Stephen Lajoie wrote:
> 
> > > . . . In 1955 a team re-analyzed Miller's results and came to the
> > > tentative conclusion that his apparatus was affected by temperature.
> >
> >Yes. So why even bring it up?
> 
> Two reasons:
> 
> 1. You wrote, "the Michelson Morely experiment has been repeated many 
> times." As far as I know, it was only repeated once, not many times, and 
> the results contradicted special relativity. Do you know of other 
> repetitions?

Yes, I was a passive listener to this debate before. There are at least 12
replications of the experiment, with on a couple of results indicating a
change in the speed of light.

As my cite notes, there are several working devices that depend upon this
principle, so you could say that it is reproven every day. This is the
"waterheater" of SR/GR.

Well, my master's project will depend upon the speed of light being
constant and relativity being in good order. :-) Good luck in you're
attempts to refute Einstein's SR/GR. Doing so will be very exciting. 



From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Mon Nov 26 15:34:26 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id PAA05315;
	Mon, 26 Nov 2001 15:28:51 -0800
Resent-Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 15:28:51 -0800
X-Authentication-Warning: eskimo.com: billb owned process doing -bs
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 15:28:48 -0800 (PST)
From: William Beaty <billb eskimo.com>
To: "'freenrg-l eskimo.com'" <freenrg-l@eskimo.com>
Subject: RE: [FG]: Latest email virus plague: badtransB
In-Reply-To: <52DBB3BCABE4D411949E00508BE7906A010B5B SERVER3>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.96.1011126152216.18533E-100000 eskimo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Resent-Message-ID: <"v0rVC1.0.xI1.p0j0y" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45381
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: RO
X-Status: 

On Sun, 25 Nov 2001, Jim Dickenson wrote:

> Bill,
> 
> Thanks for the note.  I was not yet aware of this one...


Heh.  You WILL be.   This one forges the return address, so you can't warn
the people with the infected computers.   That, plus its "auto execute"
feature, is going get it into newspaper headlines this week.  I'd even
predict that it brings hotmail and yahoo mail to its knees.

Besides updating antivirus files, anyone who uses MS Outlook must download
a security patch from microsoft: stops viruses from auto-executing an
attached file and running themselves:

  http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/security/bulletin/MS01-020.asp


>  http://www.antivirus.com/vinfo/virusencyclo/default5.asp?VName=WORM_BADTRANS.B
>  http://www.sarc.com/avcenter/venc/data/w32.badtrans.b mm.html
>  http://vil.nai.com/vil/virusSummary.asp?virus_k=99069
>  http://www.sophos.com/virusinfo/analyses/w32badtransb.html

((((((((((((((((((((( ( (  (   (    (O)    )   )  ) ) )))))))))))))))))))))
William J. Beaty                                  SCIENCE HOBBYIST website
billb eskimo.com                                  http://www.amasci.com
EE/programmer/sci-exhibits          science projects, tesla, weird science
Seattle, WA   206-789-0775          freenrg-L taoshum-L vortex-L webhead-L

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Mon Nov 26 15:38:16 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id PAA08554;
	Mon, 26 Nov 2001 15:33:10 -0800
Resent-Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 15:33:10 -0800
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 15:30:44 -0800 (PST)
From: hank scudder <hjscudde newton.csun.edu>
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Re: Loading Pd over 1.0
In-Reply-To: <ff2pvtcup2dehckj1bnp3ohkrggj6iq0a4 4ax.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0111261204420.21093-100000 newton.csun.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=X-UNKNOWN
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from QUOTED-PRINTABLE to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id PAA08406
Resent-Message-ID: <"Ba4ui1.0.952.r4j0y" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45382
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

	Apologies to all who I confused. I wrote that message in a hurry
to get home. It should have said face-centered-cubic (fcc), with a
starting lattice constant of 3.891 Angstroms. This is the distance between
adjacent corners of the cube. The distance to the center of a face was
2.751 Angstroms. This was the structure I started with. When it relaxed,
it expanded to 4.086 Angstroms on a side, and 2.8894 to the center of a
face. There are (8*1/8) + (6*1/2) atoms in the unit crystal. (Each corner
is shared with 8 adjacent unit cells, hence 1/8, and there are 8 corners 
in the unit cell. Similarly, each face is shared with 2 adjacent cells,
and there are 6 faces to the unit cell.) Thus a unit cell of fcc structure
contains 4 atoms. The total energy represents the energy to create a unit
cell out of individual Pd atoms brought in from infinity. The PdH crystal
is also fcc, with lattice 4.082 Angstroms, and binding energy per Hydrogen
atom -11.8597/4 Hydrogens = -2.965 eV.  The crystal has a H atom in
between 2 Pd atoms on all 12 sides of the crystal, and also at the very
center.

	Ed, I also ran a PdH2 hybrid, with the result of an approximately 
trigonal structure of the Pd, a=4.633 Angstroms, b=4.588, c=4.515,
alpha=82.726 degrees, beta=83.022, gamma= 83.181. It had a binding energy
of -17.4082 eV/8 Hydrogens = -2.176 eV. The relaxed crystal had the
Hydrogens spaced about 1.8 Angstroms and 2.99 Angstroms from each Pd.
>From the top, it looks like a rhombus, with the H atoms equally spaced
about each Pd atom parallel to the larger diagonal, similarly from the
side. They are not equally spaced of course, but because of symmetry, it
looks that way from the top and side views.  
	 I can send an image .eps file if anyone
is interested. The relative coordinates and forces are:

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Element  Atom     Fractional coordinates       Forces in cartesian (eV/A)
         number    after optimization step      before optimization step
                    u         v         w        Fx        Fy        Fz

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Pd       1   -0.00392  -0.00490  -0.00519  -0.03278  -0.04237  -0.04561
   Pd       2    0.50139   0.50148   0.00131   0.01370   0.00752   0.00856 
   Pd       3    0.00081   0.50245   0.50245   0.00445   0.02720   0.02124
   Pd       4    0.50155   0.00126   0.50188   0.02213   0.00688   0.01196
   H        1    0.38077   0.38703   0.39154   0.06434  -0.02459  -0.04460
   H        2    0.38121  -0.11441  -0.10911   0.00085  -0.01073  -0.03327
   H        3   -0.11566   0.38622  -0.11250  -0.02568  -0.06785   0.04413
   H        4   -0.11683  -0.11335   0.38982   0.00841   0.00644  -0.05502
   H        5    0.61962   0.61382   0.60911  -0.05665   0.03220   0.05729
   H        6    0.11763   0.11480   0.60744  -0.00215  -0.00159   0.03682
   H        7    0.11592   0.61087   0.11337   0.03085   0.04785  -0.03953
   H        8    0.61752   0.11473   0.10990  -0.02747   0.01904   0.03802
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

I am looking at PdH4 currently. I will report results later.








	I am trying a PdH4 structure also

On Thu, 22 Nov 2001, Robin van Spaandonk wrote:

> In reply to  hank scudder's message of Wed, 21 Nov 2001 16:16:06 -0800:
> Hi Hank,
> >I set up a crystal of Pd, which normally has a body centered cubic
> >structure, and I let it relax to a minimum energy configuration. This
> >resulted in a lattice constant of 3.90953 Angstroms, 
> 
> The info I have says that Pd is normally face centred, not body centred
> (as Ed has already pointed out), with a lattice constant of 3.8907 Ĺ.
> You might like to try fcc and see if you come up with the same lattice
> constant (as a test of the software).
> (See http://www.webelements.com/webelements/elements/text/Pd/xtal.html )
> 
> >and a total energy
> >of -3209.0223 eV.
> 
> This appears to be the total binding energy of the mini-crystal you
> modelled.
> 
> (See also
> http://www.webelements.com/webelements/elements/text/Pd/latt.html )
> 
> >
> >I then set up a PdH hydride, using the same crystal structure, and
> >inserted a Hydrogen atom in between each Pd atom, and let it relax,
> >resulting in a total energy of -3273.5869 eV with a lattice constant of
> >4.086193 Angstroms. If I then subtract out the energy of the Hydrogen
> >atoms alone in this same geometry, of -53.5859 eV and of Pd alone of
> >-3208.5153 eV, I get a binding energy of -11.8619 eV, 
>  
> 
> I get 11.4857 eV (so I assume we are on the same track).
> 
> >or -5.93095 eV
> >per Pd atom, which is quite stable. 
> 
> Given that the -11.8619 eV was what was left over for the whole crystal,
> and -5.93095 eV is 1/2 of that, this would seem to imply that your
> crystal only had 2 Pd atoms in it (which would make sense if you were
> only looking at a single bcc lattice cell). However, I can't correlate
> this with a total binding energy of thousands of eV for the pure Pd, as
> that would then mean -1636.79345 eV / Pd atom which is ridiculous.
> 
> (BTW I think 5 eV is probably exorbitant anyway, as that is a pretty
> large number for any chemical reaction).
> 
> >The average molecular energy at room
> >temperature, kT, is about 0.025 eV so thermal motion will not disrupt the
> >PdH hydride.
> >
> >This is all for now, I am going home for thanksgiving holiday.
> >Hank
> This will be waiting for you when you get back :)
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Robin van Spaandonk
> 
> http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/
> 
> ....Put the "bottom line" at the top!
> 

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Mon Nov 26 19:06:54 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id TAA01490;
	Mon, 26 Nov 2001 19:02:04 -0800
Resent-Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 19:02:04 -0800
Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.20011126210048.00aedd20 pop.mail.yahoo.com>
X-Sender: cjford1 pop.mail.yahoo.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58 
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 21:02:54 +0000
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
From: Charles Ford <cjford1 yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Latest email virus plague: badtransB
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.96.1011126084549.18290B-100000 eskimo.com>
References: <Pine.SUN.3.96.1011125174034.8856A-100000 eskimo.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Resent-Message-ID: <"chrrS1.0.-M.h8m0y" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45383
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: RO
X-Status: 

At 08:51 AM 11/26/01 -0800, you wrote:
>On Sun, 25 Nov 2001, William Beaty wrote:
>
>
> >  It spreads fast because it can use some versions of MS Outlook
> > to run itself when viewed (without the victim having to open the infected
> > attachments.)

Shields up !


_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free  yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Tue Nov 27 02:00:21 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id BAA21518;
	Tue, 27 Nov 2001 01:57:55 -0800
Resent-Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 01:57:55 -0800
Message-ID: <3C0363BF.785D7502 powerup.com.au>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 19:58:23 +1000
From: David Hancock <dgh powerup.com.au>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Re: Your opinions please
References: <a05100305b821dcc6f4fd [4.46.76.70]> <v04210105b825a29c367c@[192.168.123.2]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Resent-Message-ID: <"gAncL1.0.3G5.YEs0y" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45384
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

Rick Monteverde wrote:
> 
> Yup, here's the probable cause:
> 
> "...alterations to cerebration systems..."
> 
> But where's the web site where all is revealed?
> 
> - Rick Monteverde
> Honolulu, HI

Allen Caggiano wrote:

>For more information go to my web site www.get113to138mpg.com

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Tue Nov 27 12:23:54 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id MAA24736;
	Tue, 27 Nov 2001 12:20:48 -0800
Resent-Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 12:20:48 -0800
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20011127143735.04034950 pop.mindspring.com>
X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 14:48:29 -0500
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
From: Jed Rothwell <jedrothwell infinite-energy.com>
Subject: Re: Loading Pd over 1.0
In-Reply-To: <ff2pvtcup2dehckj1bnp3ohkrggj6iq0a4 4ax.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0111021433130.22784-100000 newton.csun.edu>
 <5.1.0.14.2.20011102153918.00ab4750 pop.mindspring.com>
 <Pine.LNX.4.21.0111021433130.22784-100000 newton.csun.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id MAA24673
Resent-Message-ID: <"YW2Rc.0.G26.VM_0y" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45385
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

In the Physics Letters A paper I cited, Tripodi et al. claim they may have 
observed signs of a new Pd loading configuration, the gamma phase above 90% 
loading. They cite two papers which they say describe this new phase in theory:

[7] F. Celani et al., Phys. Lett. A 214 (1996) 1–13.
[8] G. Preparata, QED Coherence in Matter, World Scientific, 1995.

If anyone has read these, please let me know what they say.

Tripodi et al. say their paper is the first experimental evidence for the 
new phase. This study is based entirely on electrochemical theory and 
measurements, of relative resistance. I do not know where in the lattice 
Preparata thought the deuterons were arranging themselves. (I have a nice 
diagram of alpha and beta loading, at Octahedral and Tetrahedral sites, 
from the Japanese edition of Scientific American).

I gather Ed Storms thinks that two or more deuterons might occupy the same 
O or T site in loading above 1.0.

- Jed

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Tue Nov 27 12:31:19 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id MAA30778;
	Tue, 27 Nov 2001 12:30:49 -0800
Resent-Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 12:30:49 -0800
Message-Id: <3.0.3.32.20011127153014.006a4bd4 alcor.concordia.ca>
X-Sender: simonb alcor.concordia.ca
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.3 (32)
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 15:30:14 -0500
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
From: Bart Simon <simonb alcor.concordia.ca>
Subject: cover ideas for my cold fusion book
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter http://amavis.org/
Resent-Message-ID: <"X4Map2.0.nW7.vV_0y" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45386
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: RO
X-Status: 

Hi all,

Okay i've been racking my brains about this and I realized why not let this
forum address the issue (I apologize in advance for being slightly
off-topic). As some of you know I have been working on a book on the
sociology of the cold fusion controversy. Many delays and shifts in editors
later the thing which is titled - "Undead Science: Science Studies and the
Afterlife of Cold Fusion" is due out with Rutgers Press in Fall 2002.

The book is basically about the impications for the cold fusion controversy
(and especially work on CF after 1990) for methods and concepts for
understanding science in sociological terms. The book is less about the
technical justification for CF (which has been admirably handled by Charles
Beaudette amongst others) and if anything it is meant to be a sustained
sociological critique of the idea of pathological science that provides a
different way of looking at the situation without having to assume that
players on one side of the controversy are irrational goofs while the
others are god's gift to science.

Anyway.. content issues aside my editor has now asked about what I would
like to see for the cover of the book and this being my first book and
all... i'm stumped. So keeping in mind that this book is about the social
and cultural aspects of the controversy (although I try to be as accurate
as possible with respect to techical issues) do any of you have any ideas
for a good cover - images, artwork, photographs, graphics?  For the moment
i'll assume that cost is no issue (although it is - basically the publisher
won't go for anything they need to pay for) because for now i'm just
looking for ideas.

Thanks for your help.
Bart
========================================
Bart Simon
Dept. of Sociology and Anthropology, LB-687
Concordia University
1455 de Maisonneuve Blvd. W.
Montreal, Quebec
H3G-1M8

phone: 514-848-2164
fax: 514-848-4539
=========================================

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Tue Nov 27 12:41:07 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx2.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id MAA23323;
	Tue, 27 Nov 2001 12:38:04 -0800 (PST)
Resent-Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 12:38:04 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20011127151559.0403e6e0 pop.mindspring.com>
X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 15:37:21 -0500
To: vortex-l eskimo.com, vortex-l@eskimo.com
From: Jed Rothwell <jedrothwell infinite-energy.com>
Subject: Re: A question of integrity
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.96.1011126142800.19169A-100000 eskimo.com>
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20011126163222.038389a0 pop.mindspring.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Resent-Message-ID: <"YZHRh.0.Ki5.fc_0y" mx2>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45387
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: RO
X-Status: 

Stephen Lajoie wrote:

> > times." As far as I know, it was only repeated once, not many times, and
> > the results contradicted special relativity. Do you know of other
> > repetitions?
>
>Yes, I was a passive listener to this debate before. There are at least 12
>replications of the experiment, with on a couple of results indicating a
>change in the speed of light.

You should tell Collins & Pinch about them.

In 1933, Miller published a paper saying that other experiments with light 
(which I gather were not exactly like M&M and his work) failed to test the 
hypothesis correctly, mainly because they were close to the ground, or 
sealed in huge boxes in the basements of massive buildings, and thus 
shielded from the putative aether wind. If one takes the aether wind 
hypothesis seriously, his objections should be taken into account. And if 
one does not take it seriously, why bother doing the experiment in the 
first place?


>As my cite notes, there are several working devices that depend upon this 
>principle, so you could say that it is reproven every day.

I pointed that out as well. However, it is conceivable that part of the 
theory is correct, and part is wrong, or incomplete. This has happened in 
the past. I doubt this is the case with s.r., but until we do the 
light-speed experiment properly, according to the aether theory, we cannot 
be sure. To be complete accurate, you should say: "there are several 
working devices which appear to operate according to the principle as far 
as we can tell . . ."

That is a mouthful! You cannot go through life adding that caveat to every 
statement about every machine that operates according to conventional 
theory. But at the back of your mind, I think you should never forget that 
a working devices never actually, literally "depends" upon "principles." 
Devices are real and principles are a figment of the human imagination. The 
actual set of rules and principles that govern real devices are beyond the 
human imagination, and always will be. I do not think that any system, no 
matter how simple, can ever be fully explicated by man. Even a simple 
machine such as a lever or a wedge grows rapidly complicated when you start 
asking about friction, what holds the solids together, what makes two 
objects separate bodies, why they cannot occupy the same space at the same 
time, how much and why the lever bends or compresses, and so on. Just a 
little beyond the bounds of what we think we know, you find a whole 
continent of unanswered questions and experiments that have not yet been 
performed satisfactorily.


>Good luck in you're attempts to refute Einstein's SR/GR. Doing so will be 
>very exciting.

I would make no such attempt. It is not worth it. Other theories stand a 
much larger chance of being wrong or incomplete. I was merely pointing out 
that the competing aethor wind may never have been properly tested. There 
is not enough time or money to test every theory.

- Jed

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Tue Nov 27 12:55:24 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id MAA11395;
	Tue, 27 Nov 2001 12:52:31 -0800
Resent-Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 12:52:31 -0800
X-Authentication-Warning: eskimo.com: lajoie owned process doing -bs
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 12:52:20 -0800 (PST)
From: Stephen Lajoie <lajoie eskimo.com>
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Re: Loading Pd over 1.0
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20011127143735.04034950 pop.mindspring.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.96.1011127124251.28704A-100000 eskimo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from QUOTED-PRINTABLE to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id MAA11269
Resent-Message-ID: <"GhDe63.0.jn2.Eq_0y" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45388
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 



Claytor's work shows that work hardened Pd produceds more tritium. 

It is reasonable to conclude that fusion is taking place at lattice
defects. 

Loading itself causes lattice defects. This explaines the 4 day delay in
the production of He-4 in Russ George's experiments. The equilibrium had
to be maintained between loading and unloading long enough for the defects
to form. Once formed, there was large enough spaces for multiple deuterons
to easily collect.

The deuterium at these lattice defects forms a  Bose Einstein Condensate.
It is as Dr. Kim's theory, except he failed to account for the high
density. They then can fuse once the BEC forms because the distance at
which their fermion nature manifests itself is about the same as the
distance at which they will fuse.

 


On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, Jed Rothwell wrote: 

> In the Physics Letters A paper I cited, Tripodi et al. claim they may have 
> observed signs of a new Pd loading configuration, the gamma phase above 90% 
> loading. They cite two papers which they say describe this new phase in theory:
> 
> [7] F. Celani et al., Phys. Lett. A 214 (1996) 1–13.
> [8] G. Preparata, QED Coherence in Matter, World Scientific, 1995.
> 
> If anyone has read these, please let me know what they say.
> 
> Tripodi et al. say their paper is the first experimental evidence for the 
> new phase. This study is based entirely on electrochemical theory and 
> measurements, of relative resistance. I do not know where in the lattice 
> Preparata thought the deuterons were arranging themselves. (I have a nice 
> diagram of alpha and beta loading, at Octahedral and Tetrahedral sites, 
> from the Japanese edition of Scientific American).
> 
> I gather Ed Storms thinks that two or more deuterons might occupy the same 
> O or T site in loading above 1.0.
> 
> - Jed
> 
> 

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Tue Nov 27 13:01:57 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id NAA18017;
	Tue, 27 Nov 2001 13:00:29 -0800
Resent-Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 13:00:29 -0800
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/9.0.1.3108
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 15:58:50 -0800
Subject: Hagelstein/ENECO in New York Times
From: "Eugene F. Mallove" <editor infinite-energy.com>
To: "vortex l eskimo.com" <vortex-l eskimo.com>
Message-ID: <B82968B9.369%editor infinite-energy.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id NAA17897
Resent-Message-ID: <"u6Njp.0.nO4.ax_0y" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45389
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: RO
X-Status: 


     
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/27/technology/27HEAT.html?todaysheadlines


November 27, 2001

A Practical Way to Make Power From Wasted Heat

By KENNETH CHANG


Scientists at M.I.T. and a small company in Salt Lake City are scheduled to
announce today that they have developed technology that can efficiently and
inexpensively transform heat pollution into electricity.

Although only a few crude samples have been built, Dr. Yan Kucherov,
director of research and development at the Salt Lake City company, Eneco
Inc., and Dr. Peter L. Hagelstein, professor of electrical engineering at
M.I.T. and a technical consultant at Eneco, say that their devices improve
the efficiency of the conversion by more than half.

"It's really first-generation, very primitive implementation," Dr.
Hagelstein said. "Potentially, it's an enormous deal. This opens a door."

While the heat generated by car engines and power plants usually does
nothing but warm the surrounding air, scientists have long dreamed of
building so-called thermoelectric devices that can capture the wasted heat
and convert a portion of it into electricity.

Such devices could significantly increase the electrical output of existing
power plants or power the electrical systems of automobiles, replacing
alternators and increasing gas mileage.

The Pentagon, which partly financed the new research, has been interested in
using the devices for silent motors. Operating in reverse, thermoelectric
devices can also be used as refrigerators.

Another advantage of thermoelectric devices is that they produce electricity
without generating additional pollution.

Current thermoelectric technology converts only about 10 percent of the heat
it absorbs into electricity, too inefficient a return for widespread use.
The new devices, however, reach about 17 percent, and Dr. Hagelstein said
future devices should be able to improve upon that significantly.

It is impossible to transform 100 percent of the heat into electricity. The
laws of physics dictate a theoretical maximum of about 50 percent at the
temperature a thermoelectric device operates at. Current commercial
thermoelectric devices, at 10 percent efficiency, get only one-fifth the
maximum. Using the new technology, future devices should be able to achieve
more than half the maximum.

The researchers are presenting their findings at a meeting of the Materials
Research Society in Boston. Scientific papers describing the experiments
have been submitted to the journals Physical Review Letters and Applied
Physics Letters.

If borne out, the findings would be significant, said Dr. George S. Nolas, a
professor of physics at the University of South Florida and an organizer of
a symposium about thermoelectric devices at the Materials Research Society
meeting. Dr. Nolas had not seen the Eneco paper but said the reported
efficiency was high enough to find practical use and "would be pretty good
news."

Eneco's thermoelectric device is a sandwich of three layers of
semiconductor. One outer layer is heated; the other is kept at room
temperature. The middle layer acts as an insulator to maintain the
temperature difference.

The heat causes electrons to shoot out, some crossing the sandwich to
generate an electrical current. The Eneco researchers added impurities ‹ a
process called doping ‹ to the heated layer to increase the flow of
electrons.

"The region near the hot part is heavily doped, so it boils off electrons,"
Dr. Hagelstein said. "We get more voltage and more current."

He added: "The underlying technology is really very simple. It should be a
very practical, relatively cheap technology."

Leroy Becker, marketing director of Eneco, which is not associated with the
Dutch utility Eneco Energie, said the company hoped to produce a prototype
of a practical device within a year and sell it within two years.

Eneco, a privately held company, was created in 1991 to seek to license
patents on cold fusion after the controversial claim of two University of
Utah scientists that they could produce almost limitless amounts of energy
in a room-temperature flask of water. Eneco also financed follow-up research
on cold fusion, including work by Dr. Hagelstein. The claims for cold fusion
were far overstated, and several years ago, Eneco shifted its focus to
thermoelectric devices.

Home | Back to Technology | Search | Help    Back to Top
     




"Stop Smoking"
Advertising Feature

Find More Low Fares!
Experience Orbitz!


$7 Trades, $25,000,000 account protection


 Click here to order Reprints or Permissions of this Article
Click Here to Receive 50% Off Home Delivery of The New York Times Newspaper.


Copyright 2001 The New York Times Company | Privacy Information 

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Tue Nov 27 13:08:20 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id NAA22761;
	Tue, 27 Nov 2001 13:07:16 -0800
Resent-Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 13:07:16 -0800
X-Authentication-Warning: eskimo.com: lajoie owned process doing -bs
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 13:07:12 -0800 (PST)
From: Stephen Lajoie <lajoie eskimo.com>
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Re: A question of integrity
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20011127151559.0403e6e0 pop.mindspring.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.96.1011127125537.28704B-100000 eskimo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Resent-Message-ID: <"NrGtk2.0.MZ5.3201y" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45390
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 



The speed of light can be derived from Maxwell's equations, which show it
to be a constant. Is Maxwell's equations also "a house of cards"? (1)
IRRC, the Einstein's original derivation of SR didn't even mention MM and
was based purely on the wave equation of light.

My literature search in the Physics library came up dry, because the
subject was just too old. 


(1) I'm asking, not making fun. See, for example, Robertson, Rev. Mod.
Phys. 21 (1949) 549 or Lammerzahd, Physics Letters A 282 (2001) 223.

On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, Jed Rothwell wrote:

> Stephen Lajoie wrote:
> 
> > > times." As far as I know, it was only repeated once, not many times, and
> > > the results contradicted special relativity. Do you know of other
> > > repetitions?
> >
> >Yes, I was a passive listener to this debate before. There are at least 12
> >replications of the experiment, with on a couple of results indicating a
> >change in the speed of light.
> 
> You should tell Collins & Pinch about them.
>
> In 1933, Miller published a paper saying that other experiments with light 
> (which I gather were not exactly like M&M and his work) failed to test the 
> hypothesis correctly, mainly because they were close to the ground, or 
> sealed in huge boxes in the basements of massive buildings, and thus 
> shielded from the putative aether wind. 

Since electric and magnetic fields, which are suppose to be part of the
aether wind, can pass through in these conditions, his argument doesn't
hold. 


>If one takes the aether wind 
> hypothesis seriously, his objections should be taken into account. And if 
> one does not take it seriously, why bother doing the experiment in the 
> first place?
> 
> 
> >As my cite notes, there are several working devices that depend upon this 
> >principle, so you could say that it is reproven every day.
> 
> I pointed that out as well. However, it is conceivable that part of the 
> theory is correct, and part is wrong, or incomplete. This has happened in 
> the past. I doubt this is the case with s.r., but until we do the 
> light-speed experiment properly, according to the aether theory, we cannot 
> be sure. To be complete accurate, you should say: "there are several 
> working devices which appear to operate according to the principle as far 
> as we can tell . . ."

:-)  I give, but I am not convinced. I am not convinced because I've seen
the references. I give because I don't want to spend the effort to look
them up and share them.



From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Tue Nov 27 13:24:51 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id NAA00942;
	Tue, 27 Nov 2001 13:21:39 -0800
Resent-Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 13:21:39 -0800
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 13:19:01 -0800 (PST)
From: hank scudder <hjscudde newton.csun.edu>
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Re: A question of integrity
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20011127151559.0403e6e0 pop.mindspring.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0111271316010.21093-100000 newton.csun.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Resent-Message-ID: <"Skdu12.0.VE.YF01y" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45391
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

	Jed
Where is the aether theory written down? Exactly what test does one do to
test it? What sheilds the aether, how does it work, etc. I am not sure
what exactly we are trying to compare with special relativity.

Hank


On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, Jed Rothwell wrote:

> Stephen Lajoie wrote:
> 
> > > times." As far as I know, it was only repeated once, not many times, and
> > > the results contradicted special relativity. Do you know of other
> > > repetitions?
> >
> >Yes, I was a passive listener to this debate before. There are at least 12
> >replications of the experiment, with on a couple of results indicating a
> >change in the speed of light.
> 
> You should tell Collins & Pinch about them.
> 
> In 1933, Miller published a paper saying that other experiments with light 
> (which I gather were not exactly like M&M and his work) failed to test the 
> hypothesis correctly, mainly because they were close to the ground, or 
> sealed in huge boxes in the basements of massive buildings, and thus 
> shielded from the putative aether wind. If one takes the aether wind 
> hypothesis seriously, his objections should be taken into account. And if 
> one does not take it seriously, why bother doing the experiment in the 
> first place?
> 
> 
> >As my cite notes, there are several working devices that depend upon this 
> >principle, so you could say that it is reproven every day.
> 
> I pointed that out as well. However, it is conceivable that part of the 
> theory is correct, and part is wrong, or incomplete. This has happened in 
> the past. I doubt this is the case with s.r., but until we do the 
> light-speed experiment properly, according to the aether theory, we cannot 
> be sure. To be complete accurate, you should say: "there are several 
> working devices which appear to operate according to the principle as far 
> as we can tell . . ."
> 
> That is a mouthful! You cannot go through life adding that caveat to every 
> statement about every machine that operates according to conventional 
> theory. But at the back of your mind, I think you should never forget that 
> a working devices never actually, literally "depends" upon "principles." 
> Devices are real and principles are a figment of the human imagination. The 
> actual set of rules and principles that govern real devices are beyond the 
> human imagination, and always will be. I do not think that any system, no 
> matter how simple, can ever be fully explicated by man. Even a simple 
> machine such as a lever or a wedge grows rapidly complicated when you start 
> asking about friction, what holds the solids together, what makes two 
> objects separate bodies, why they cannot occupy the same space at the same 
> time, how much and why the lever bends or compresses, and so on. Just a 
> little beyond the bounds of what we think we know, you find a whole 
> continent of unanswered questions and experiments that have not yet been 
> performed satisfactorily.
> 
> 
> >Good luck in you're attempts to refute Einstein's SR/GR. Doing so will be 
> >very exciting.
> 
> I would make no such attempt. It is not worth it. Other theories stand a 
> much larger chance of being wrong or incomplete. I was merely pointing out 
> that the competing aethor wind may never have been properly tested. There 
> is not enough time or money to test every theory.
> 
> - Jed
> 

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Tue Nov 27 13:48:05 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id NAA15892;
	Tue, 27 Nov 2001 13:47:42 -0800
Resent-Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 13:47:42 -0800
Message-ID: <01a001c1778c$2b5c98a0$6401a8c0 Home>
From: "Don Wiegel" <dwiegel home.com>
To: <vortex-l eskimo.com>
References: <3.0.3.32.20011127153014.006a4bd4 alcor.concordia.ca>
Subject: Re: cover ideas for my cold fusion book
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 14:40:38 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Resent-Message-ID: <"Nf8Ix1.0.Du3.-d01y" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45393
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

How about a photo/painting of a candle flame melting an ice cube
(suspended above the flame on a string) with a Blue merged to Red
background.

..DonW..


----- Original Message -----
From: "Bart Simon" <simonb alcor.concordia.ca>
To: <vortex-l eskimo.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 1:30 PM
Subject: cover ideas for my cold fusion book


> Hi all,
>
> Okay i've been racking my brains about this and I realized why not let
this
> forum address the issue (I apologize in advance for being slightly
> off-topic). As some of you know I have been working on a book on the
> sociology of the cold fusion controversy. Many delays and shifts in
editors
> later the thing which is titled - "Undead Science: Science Studies and the
> Afterlife of Cold Fusion" is due out with Rutgers Press in Fall 2002.
>
> Thanks for your help.
> Bart
> ========================================
> Bart Simon
> Dept. of Sociology and Anthropology, LB-687
> Concordia University

>
>

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Tue Nov 27 13:48:44 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id NAA14715;
	Tue, 27 Nov 2001 13:45:17 -0800
Resent-Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 13:45:17 -0800
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20011127155222.04040750 pop.mindspring.com>
X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 16:45:05 -0500
To: vortex-l eskimo.com, vortex-l@eskimo.com
From: Jed Rothwell <jedrothwell infinite-energy.com>
Subject: Re: cover ideas for my cold fusion book
In-Reply-To: <3.0.3.32.20011127153014.006a4bd4 alcor.concordia.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Resent-Message-ID: <"zQdjz3.0.bb3.hb01y" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45392
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

Bart Simon wrote:

>Anyway.. content issues aside my editor has now asked about what I would 
>like to see for the cover of the book and this being my first book and 
>all... i'm stumped. So keeping in mind that this book is about the social 
>and cultural aspects of the controversy (although I try to be as accurate 
>as possible with respect to techical issues) do any of you have any ideas 
>for a good cover - images, artwork, photographs, graphics?

I think you should illustrate the cover with one of McKubre's graphs 
showing 90 sigma excess heat. This data proves that the content of your 
book has no technical merit. I trust that you honestly do try to be "as 
accurate as possible with respect to technical issue," but you utterly 
fail. If you or your publisher understood these graphs, and the facts they 
reveal, you would withdraw the book from publication.

I cannot comment on the "social and cultural aspects of the controversy" as 
you see them. As I pointed out earlier, the controversy itself is about 
calorimetry, not society & culture. If I understand your paper correctly, 
you have failed to make this vital distinction, apparently based on some 
trendy, shallow notions of "cultural relativity" or some other humbug. You 
think "calorimetry" is somehow inseparable from the lives, politics, and 
petty concerns of people who do calorimetry. This is like thinking that if 
an architect divorces or dies his building will fall down. You seem to 
reject the basis of the distinction. You confuse the human process of doing 
science, which is fraught with culturally based delusions and "idols," with 
the content of science itself, which (in part at least) transcends the 
human imagination and the limits of culture. This vital distinction was 
first described in detail by F. Bacon in the early 1600s. It is the basis 
of our Civilization, so I think you should learn more about it.

To be concrete, your paper confuses two separate and unrelated topics: 1. 
What the experiments actually show. 2. What some ignorant scientists 
mistakenly believe they show. It is important to realize that a scientist 
may be ignorant, bigoted and he may embrace whacky notions and unfounded 
beliefs. He is just a likely to be wrong as a cavemen or a Roman peasant in 
the year 200 AD was. Human nature has not changed. Knowing many detailed 
and correct facts about one technical subject does not prevent today's 
scientist from being utterly deluded about another technical subject. For 
that matter, Roman peasants knew more than most people nowadays think they did.

There are many social & cultural controversies surrounding "hot button" 
topics such as evolution or cloning. These have no relevance to the 
technical content of biology. It is interesting -- and valuable -- to study 
these social & cultural effusions. They are a fit subject for anthropology, 
sociology, literature or social pathology. They are good way to learn about 
people, in other words. But no one who is interested in biology per se 
needs to take these notions into account. If you were to write about 
scientists who believe in "creationism" you might make a valuable 
contribution to sociology, but not if you started mixing up their beliefs 
with biology, and not if you claimed you book was about biology. The people 
you describe and quote in your paper know nothing about the actual content 
of cold fusion research, any more than creationists know about biology, or 
witch doctors know about blood chemistry.

- Jed

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Tue Nov 27 14:03:24 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id OAA25548;
	Tue, 27 Nov 2001 14:01:53 -0800
Resent-Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 14:01:53 -0800
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.1.20011127165754.023a78f0 world.std.com>
X-Sender: mica world.std.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 17:01:14 -0500
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
From: Mitchell Swartz <mica world.std.com>
Subject: Re: cover ideas for my cold fusion book
In-Reply-To: <3.0.3.32.20011127153014.006a4bd4 alcor.concordia.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Resent-Message-ID: <"S3dR7.0.wE6.Gr01y" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45394
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 


Bart:

   Why don't you focus on the truth: which is, the pathological criticism 
of cold fusion
    and the cold fusion researchers, and the associated coverup of cold 
fusion results.

    The truth about Heavywatergate --and the coverup--  is more important 
than any cover.

        Dr. Mitchell Swartz







At 03:30 PM 11/27/2001 -0500, you wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>Okay i've been racking my brains about this and I realized why not let this
>forum address the issue (I apologize in advance for being slightly
>off-topic). As some of you know I have been working on a book on the
>sociology of the cold fusion controversy. Many delays and shifts in editors
>later the thing which is titled - "Undead Science: Science Studies and the
>Afterlife of Cold Fusion" is due out with Rutgers Press in Fall 2002.
>
>The book is basically about the impications for the cold fusion controversy
>(and especially work on CF after 1990) for methods and concepts for
>understanding science in sociological terms. The book is less about the
>technical justification for CF (which has been admirably handled by Charles
>Beaudette amongst others) and if anything it is meant to be a sustained
>sociological critique of the idea of pathological science that provides a
>different way of looking at the situation without having to assume that
>players on one side of the controversy are irrational goofs while the
>others are god's gift to science.
>
>Anyway.. content issues aside my editor has now asked about what I would
>like to see for the cover of the book and this being my first book and
>all... i'm stumped. So keeping in mind that this book is about the social
>and cultural aspects of the controversy (although I try to be as accurate
>as possible with respect to techical issues) do any of you have any ideas
>for a good cover - images, artwork, photographs, graphics?  For the moment
>i'll assume that cost is no issue (although it is - basically the publisher
>won't go for anything they need to pay for) because for now i'm just
>looking for ideas.
>
>Thanks for your help.
>Bart
>========================================
>Bart Simon
>Dept. of Sociology and Anthropology, LB-687
>Concordia University
>1455 de Maisonneuve Blvd. W.
>Montreal, Quebec
>H3G-1M8
>
>phone: 514-848-2164
>fax: 514-848-4539
>=========================================

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Tue Nov 27 14:07:04 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id OAA28329;
	Tue, 27 Nov 2001 14:06:01 -0800
Resent-Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 14:06:01 -0800
Message-ID: <3C040F14.C6CAB1D7 bellsouth.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 17:09:24 -0500
From: Terry Blanton <commengr bellsouth.net>
Organization: .
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Re: cover ideas for my cold fusion book
References: <3.0.3.32.20011127153014.006a4bd4 alcor.concordia.ca> <01a001c1778c$2b5c98a0$6401a8c0@Home>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Resent-Message-ID: <"RlrPl.0.Uw6.8v01y" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45395
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

Don Wiegel wrote:
> 
> How about a photo/painting of a candle flame melting an ice cube
> (suspended above the flame on a string) with a Blue merged to Red
> background.

Or, a flame emerging from an ice cube melting a candle,
symbolizing cold fusion replacing fossil fuels.  ;-)

Terry

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Tue Nov 27 14:13:21 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx2.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id OAA00314;
	Tue, 27 Nov 2001 14:09:41 -0800 (PST)
Resent-Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 14:09:41 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20011127164743.00ab65d0 pop.mindspring.com>
X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 17:09:16 -0500
To: vortex-l eskimo.com, vortex-l@eskimo.com
From: Jed Rothwell <jedrothwell infinite-energy.com>
Subject: Re: A question of integrity
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0111271316010.21093-100000 newton.csun.edu>
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20011127151559.0403e6e0 pop.mindspring.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Resent-Message-ID: <"1hWPU1.0.p4.Uy01y" mx2>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45396
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

hank scudder wrote:

>Where is the aether theory written down?

Honestly, I do not know much about it. I suppose the best expression of it 
would have been the final flowering of the theory, circa 1933, by Miller 
and others. Years ago, in the Cornell library, I read a college physics 
textbook published at that time. It treated aether as the respectable, 
mainstream theory. There was brief note about "new and still controversial" 
special relativity at the end of the chapter.

I suppose the theory must have seemed tenable to many mainstream 
physicists, and worth testing, since the AAAS awarded the experiments its 
annual prize in 1925.


>Exactly what test does one do to test it? What sheilds the aether, how 
>does it work, etc.

I gather they though the atmosphere and objects on the earth's surface 
shielded against it. They thought the atmosphere carries along a portion of 
the aether "entrained," holding it stock still relative to earth, kind of 
like the water at the bank of a river. Perhaps they came up with that 
notion after M&M failed to detect the "aether wind." Miller said, "The 
experiment is designed to detect a very minute effect on the velocity of 
light . . . and it would seem to be essential that there should be the 
least possible obstruction between the free ether and the light path in the 
interferometer . . ."


>I am not sure what exactly we are trying to compare with special relativity.

Perhaps no one ever defined it exactly? I wouldn't know. I suppose the 
theory is wrong, which would make it hard to refine with exactitude. But I 
have not read Miller, and I cannot say. C&P quote him briefly. He sounds 
sensible. The AAAS took him seriously, and they are usually sensible, but 
on the other hand they take the anti-CF crowd seriously today, so you never 
can tell. Sometimes, mainstream theories get prizes only because they are 
mainstream, by contingency and incumbency.

I should note that the latest issue of Infinite Energy has several articles 
about modern ether theory. Unfortunately, I do not understand enough about 
theory to read or comment on them. I honestly had no idea what they say, 
which is why I hesitate to mention them.

- Jed

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Tue Nov 27 14:26:42 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id OAA07947;
	Tue, 27 Nov 2001 14:23:42 -0800
Resent-Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 14:23:42 -0800
X-Authentication-Warning: eskimo.com: lajoie owned process doing -bs
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 14:23:38 -0800 (PST)
From: Stephen Lajoie <lajoie eskimo.com>
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Re: cover ideas for my cold fusion book
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20011127155222.04040750 pop.mindspring.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.96.1011127141410.5470B-100000 eskimo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Resent-Message-ID: <"y18vq3.0.5y1.k911y" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45397
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, Jed Rothwell wrote:

> Bart Simon wrote:
> 
> >Anyway.. content issues aside my editor has now asked about what I would 
> >like to see for the cover of the book and this being my first book and 
> >all... i'm stumped. So keeping in mind that this book is about the social 
> >and cultural aspects of the controversy (although I try to be as accurate 
> >as possible with respect to techical issues) do any of you have any ideas 
> >for a good cover - images, artwork, photographs, graphics?
> 
> I think you should illustrate the cover with one of McKubre's graphs 
> showing 90 sigma excess heat. This data proves that the content of your 
> book has no technical merit. I trust that you honestly do try to be "as 
> accurate as possible with respect to technical issue," but you utterly 
> fail. If you or your publisher understood these graphs, and the facts they 
> reveal, you would withdraw the book from publication.


He said that the techinical issues was handeled by "How cold fusion
prevailed", a book whichs debunks the really bad science done by the
skeptics, and points to the clear evidence that indicates cold fusion. 
 
The topic of the text is the social aspects of the controversy, which
really has nothing at all to do with cold fusion or the cold fusion
effect. 


From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Tue Nov 27 14:28:40 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id OAA10778;
	Tue, 27 Nov 2001 14:28:03 -0800
Resent-Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 14:28:03 -0800
X-Authentication-Warning: eskimo.com: lajoie owned process doing -bs
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 14:27:54 -0800 (PST)
From: Stephen Lajoie <lajoie eskimo.com>
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Re: cover ideas for my cold fusion book
In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.1.20011127165754.023a78f0 world.std.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.96.1011127142404.5470C-100000 eskimo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Resent-Message-ID: <"6uSCJ3.0.De2.oD11y" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45398
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, Mitchell Swartz wrote:

> 
> Bart:
> 
>    Why don't you focus on the truth: which is, the pathological criticism 
> of cold fusion
>     and the cold fusion researchers, and the associated coverup of cold 
> fusion results.
> 
>     The truth about Heavywatergate --and the coverup--  is more important 
> than any cover.
> 
>         Dr. Mitchell Swartz

How do you know there is an intentional cover-up? I'm sure that there are
plenty of highly intelligent people out there that let their bias and need
to appear respectable color their opinions and lead them to pass off their
emotional opinions as scientific ones.

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Tue Nov 27 14:35:11 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id OAA15238;
	Tue, 27 Nov 2001 14:34:28 -0800
Resent-Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 14:34:28 -0800
Reply-To: <knagel gis.net>
From: "Keith Nagel" <knagel gis.net>
To: <vortex-l eskimo.com>
Subject: RE: Latest email virus plague: badtransB
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 17:43:28 -0500
Message-ID: <NDBBLHBMKKFMAIAFAAKMGEFJDAAA.knagel gis.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
In-Reply-To: <4.2.0.58.20011126210048.00aedd20 pop.mail.yahoo.com>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
Importance: Normal
Resent-Message-ID: <"RJVhd2.0.-j3.pJ11y" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45399
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

You guys are a bunch of holiday hams...

The MicroMunchkins wrote up a pretty good
report on the bug, so why even bother with the
patch? Change the security setting for IE
so that file downloads are prohibited. It's
a shame that there's not an option to query
the user but I understand IE6 fixes
this problem? Better still, disable the
preview pane in Outlook so HTML doesn't
get automagically rendered...
Solves a whole slew of worm problems.

If everyone switches to linux, then we
could all be discussing the latest linux worm,
huh?

K.






-----Original Message-----
From: Charles Ford [mailto:cjford1 yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 4:03 PM
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Re: Latest email virus plague: badtransB


At 08:51 AM 11/26/01 -0800, you wrote:
>On Sun, 25 Nov 2001, William Beaty wrote:
>
>
> >  It spreads fast because it can use some versions of MS Outlook
> > to run itself when viewed (without the victim having to open the
infected
> > attachments.)

Shields up !


_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free  yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com


From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Tue Nov 27 14:37:50 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id OAA17129;
	Tue, 27 Nov 2001 14:37:10 -0800
Resent-Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 14:37:10 -0800
X-Authentication-Warning: eskimo.com: lajoie owned process doing -bs
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 14:37:05 -0800 (PST)
From: Stephen Lajoie <lajoie eskimo.com>
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Re: A question of integrity
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20011127164743.00ab65d0 pop.mindspring.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.96.1011127142905.5470D-100000 eskimo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Resent-Message-ID: <"V-LLL3.0.OB4.LM11y" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45400
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, Jed Rothwell wrote:

> hank scudder wrote:
> 
> >Where is the aether theory written down?
> 
> Honestly, I do not know much about it. I suppose the best expression of it 
> would have been the final flowering of the theory, circa 1933, by Miller 
> and others. Years ago, in the Cornell library, I read a college physics 
> textbook published at that time. It treated aether as the respectable, 
> mainstream theory. There was brief note about "new and still controversial" 
> special relativity at the end of the chapter.

Yes, relativity was treated pretty much the same way that cold fusion is
treated now. 
 
 >Exactly what test does one do to test it? What sheilds the aether, how 
> shielded against it. They thought the atmosphere carries along a portion of 
> the aether "entrained," holding it stock still relative to earth, kind of 
> like the water at the bank of a river. Perhaps they came up with that 


The aether drag theory was debunked. The way it was debunked was by
observing a moon of Jupiter. They could calculate the orbital period and
noted the time it took for the moon to be observed going around Jupiter. I
don't recall the specifics, but it depended on the apparent period of the
moon in completing a partial orbit.  It is easy to see how this could be
done. 



From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Tue Nov 27 18:10:06 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id SAA09916;
	Tue, 27 Nov 2001 18:07:24 -0800
Resent-Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 18:07:24 -0800
Message-Id: <3.0.6.32.20011127210738.007babe0 pop.mindspring.com>
X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.6 (32)
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 21:07:38 -0500
To: vortex-l eskimo.com, vortex-l@eskimo.com
From: Jed Rothwell <JedRothwell infinite-energy.com>
Subject: Re: cover ideas for my cold fusion book
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.96.1011127141410.5470B-100000 eskimo.com>
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20011127155222.04040750 pop.mindspring.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Resent-Message-ID: <"wXy2g3.0.sQ2.SR41y" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45401
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

Stephen Lajoie wrote:

>He said that the techinical issues was handeled by "How cold fusion
>prevailed", a book whichs debunks the really bad science done by the
>skeptics, and points to the clear evidence that indicates cold fusion. 
> 
>The topic of the text is the social aspects of the controversy, which
>really has nothing at all to do with cold fusion or the cold fusion
>effect.

I read his essay, and wrote a response here. I do not think he handled the
technical details well. I think he tried to judge the scientific issues
based on the social response. Perhaps I misunderstood the essay. He did not
respond to my critique or correct my impression.

- Jed

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Tue Nov 27 20:42:54 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id UAA18630;
	Tue, 27 Nov 2001 20:39:07 -0800
Resent-Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 20:39:07 -0800
Message-ID: <009101c177c1$883ee020$fce433d0 usadatanet.net>
From: "Ryan Hopkins" <thebishop usadatanet.net>
To: <vortex-l eskimo.com>
References: <3.0.3.32.20011127153014.006a4bd4 alcor.concordia.ca>
Subject: Re: cover ideas for my cold fusion book
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 23:02:23 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
Resent-Message-ID: <"tPTs-3.0.uY4.hf61y" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45402
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

Sounds interesting.  I'm a graphic artist and have an idea - I'll send it to
you in a few days if you don't mind.  What's the size of the book?
Ryan Hopkins

http://lotek_1.tripod.com/

----- Original Message -----
From: "Bart Simon" <simonb alcor.concordia.ca>
To: <vortex-l eskimo.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 3:30 PM
Subject: cover ideas for my cold fusion book


> Hi all,
>
> Okay i've been racking my brains about this and I realized why not let
this
> forum address the issue (I apologize in advance for being slightly
> off-topic). As some of you know I have been working on a book on the
> sociology of the cold fusion controversy. Many delays and shifts in
editors
> later the thing which is titled - "Undead Science: Science Studies and the
> Afterlife of Cold Fusion" is due out with Rutgers Press in Fall 2002.
>
> The book is basically about the impications for the cold fusion
controversy
> (and especially work on CF after 1990) for methods and concepts for
> understanding science in sociological terms. The book is less about the
> technical justification for CF (which has been admirably handled by
Charles
> Beaudette amongst others) and if anything it is meant to be a sustained
> sociological critique of the idea of pathological science that provides a
> different way of looking at the situation without having to assume that
> players on one side of the controversy are irrational goofs while the
> others are god's gift to science.
>
> Anyway.. content issues aside my editor has now asked about what I would
> like to see for the cover of the book and this being my first book and
> all... i'm stumped. So keeping in mind that this book is about the social
> and cultural aspects of the controversy (although I try to be as accurate
> as possible with respect to techical issues) do any of you have any ideas
> for a good cover - images, artwork, photographs, graphics?  For the moment
> i'll assume that cost is no issue (although it is - basically the
publisher
> won't go for anything they need to pay for) because for now i'm just
> looking for ideas.
>
> Thanks for your help.
> Bart
> ========================================
> Bart Simon
> Dept. of Sociology and Anthropology, LB-687
> Concordia University
> 1455 de Maisonneuve Blvd. W.
> Montreal, Quebec
> H3G-1M8
>
> phone: 514-848-2164
> fax: 514-848-4539
> =========================================
>

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Tue Nov 27 23:12:16 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id XAA26734;
	Tue, 27 Nov 2001 23:09:29 -0800
Resent-Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 23:09:29 -0800
Message-ID: <3C048DB6.13F7131 home.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 23:09:42 -0800
From: Bob Horst <bhorst home.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en]C-CCK-MCD {Sony}  (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Re: cover ideas for my cold fusion book
References: <3.0.3.32.20011127153014.006a4bd4 alcor.concordia.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Resent-Message-ID: <"F4FJF2.0.eX6.fs81y" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45403
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

Bart --

How about a picture of some distinguished people looking for keys under a
streetlight,
while the ground in the shadows is littered with keys.

It sounds like your book is about the way society treats those who
look in the shadows.

-- Bob Horst

Bart Simon wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Okay i've been racking my brains about this and I realized why not let this
> forum address the issue (I apologize in advance for being slightly
> off-topic). As some of you know I have been working on a book on the
> sociology of the cold fusion controversy. Many delays and shifts in editors
> later the thing which is titled - "Undead Science: Science Studies and the
> Afterlife of Cold Fusion" is due out with Rutgers Press in Fall 2002.
>
> The book is basically about the impications for the cold fusion controversy
> (and especially work on CF after 1990) for methods and concepts for
> understanding science in sociological terms. The book is less about the
> technical justification for CF (which has been admirably handled by Charles
> Beaudette amongst others) and if anything it is meant to be a sustained
> sociological critique of the idea of pathological science that provides a
> different way of looking at the situation without having to assume that
> players on one side of the controversy are irrational goofs while the
> others are god's gift to science.
>
> Anyway.. content issues aside my editor has now asked about what I would
> like to see for the cover of the book and this being my first book and
> all... i'm stumped. So keeping in mind that this book is about the social
> and cultural aspects of the controversy (although I try to be as accurate
> as possible with respect to techical issues) do any of you have any ideas
> for a good cover - images, artwork, photographs, graphics?  For the moment
> i'll assume that cost is no issue (although it is - basically the publisher
> won't go for anything they need to pay for) because for now i'm just
> looking for ideas.
>

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Wed Nov 28 01:04:34 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id BAA08945;
	Wed, 28 Nov 2001 01:01:52 -0800
Resent-Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 01:01:52 -0800
From: Robin van Spaandonk <rvanspaa bigpond.net.au>
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Re: A question of integrity
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 20:01:20 +1100
Organization: Improving
Message-ID: <mk780u4ne4qvp75brsan2f7acf03qdv5sc 4ax.com>
References: <2lk30usvt4lpk1g8t7917o37mtq1es1hul 4ax.com> <Pine.SUN.3.96.1011126105105.29753B-100000@eskimo.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.96.1011126105105.29753B-100000 eskimo.com>
X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.553
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id BAA08911
Resent-Message-ID: <"L1vLX1.0.cB2._VA1y" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45404
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

In reply to  Stephen Lajoie's message of Mon, 26 Nov 2001 11:12:25
-0800:
>On Mon, 26 Nov 2001, Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
[snip]
>> Einstein assumed the speed of light as the maximum speed at which any
>> object could travel,
>
>He didn't assume that. He took the MM experiment at face value in that it
>indicated that an observer in motion would measure the speed of light to
>be the same regardless of his velocity. 


There are alternative theories which explain the MM experimental
results, without making that assumption.

>From that, he was able to derive
>that no mass or energy could move faster than light. The derivation
>involved showing that it would require infinate energy (not the magazine)
>to reach the speed of light. 

This derivation contains a hidden assumption, being that the means of
attempting such a feat be by normal acceleration. Travel through a
wormhole would be an example of an alternative approach.
It has also since it was first derived, been generalised beyond its
scope of applicability.
IMO kinetic energy is magnetic field energy, which in turn assumes the
presence of a self-magnetic field. It may be possible to create a pure
electrical wave that has no magnetic component, and is therefore not
limited to the speed of light, as no energy need be (is) stored in the
magnetic field.

>
>> when he developed the ST. Since then everyone else
>> has jumped on the band wagon, and assumed that absolutely nothing could
>> travel faster than light, including information. There is however some
>> evidence to suggest that this isn't so.
>
>Again, there was no assumption. The information clause was supportive of
>the limit on speed of mass and energy and was consistant with causality. 

As far as I can see, the speed of light has nothing to do with
causality.
Causality is linked to the speed of information transfer, which is not
bound to the speed of light (IMO). (BTW this is also a consequence of
"entanglement" if you want to believe in that).
However I don't believe in it, and consequently see no need to use FTL
to explain it. Bob Lowry's comment on phase relationships is much nearer
the true explanation for "entanglement" IMO.
Phase information is an aspect of particle physics that is usually
ignored. Is it then any wonder that we get "magical" results. First
throw the information away, then point to a relationship that "pops up
out of nowhere". "Look, nothing up my sleeves!"
[snip]
>You said it was a house of cards. It appears to be a well thought out and
>tested theory, with few problems in it's predictions. 

I think it is a house of cards, in as much as the epicycle theory was a
house of cards. It too worked, but was replaced by a simpler model .
I think this is what is in store for the standard model. I think the
replacement will be an aether theory.
One clue to this is the Plank mass, which currently has no apparent real
partner.
I also think the Higgs boson is a pipe dream. Mass is a measure of
energy content, through interaction with the vacuum, and not a special
property of matter that requires a new particle. In fact there is no
such thing as mass, i.e. it is not an intrinsic property of matter, it
is an extrinsic property. The relevant intrinsic property is particle
size (the smaller the particle, the more "massive" it is - at least for
"simple" particles i.e. not conglomerates).
(Leptons are simple particles, Baryons are conglomerates).
[snip]

> 
>> >We can conclude
>> >that everything we know is in some measure wrong. Theories are, however,
>> >as good as their predictions, and the predictions of SR and GR are fairly
>> >good on the large scale. It is still the best theory.
>> 
>> It is still a fairly good theory. There are a couple of others that I
>> would give the time day.
>
>?!?

This isn't as contradictory as it appears. The epicycle theory worked
too, and was fine as far as it went. It was a house of cards (i.e. based
on weak foundations and doomed to collapse and be replaced)
nevertheless.
[snip]
>> >I don't think it says that. You take an intergral around the particle and
>> >assume the particle is in the volume. 
>> 
>> Try convincing PZ that it isn't a point particle :)
>
>Who is PZ?
Dr. Peter Zimmerman(n?).

Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/

....Put the "bottom line" at the top!

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Wed Nov 28 01:09:28 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id BAA11801;
	Wed, 28 Nov 2001 01:08:43 -0800
Resent-Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 01:08:43 -0800
Message-ID: <003b01c177ec$5bc4dce0$c98f209a ggrf30j>
From: "Nick Palmer" <nick7 itl.net>
To: <vortex-l eskimo.com>
Subject: N.Y. Times article
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 09:09:11 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Resent-Message-ID: <"t1j1Q3.0.Ju2.RcA1y" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45405
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: RO
X-Status: 

Here's an article from the NY Times that mentions Eneco, Hagelstein and cold
fusion...

Nick Palmer
===========================================================================
November 27, 2001

A Practical Way to Make Power From Wasted Heat
By KENNETH CHANG


Scientists at M.I.T. and a small company in Salt Lake City are scheduled to
announce today that they have developed technology that can efficiently and
inexpensively transform heat pollution into electricity.

Although only a few crude samples have been built, Dr. Yan Kucherov,
director of research and development at the Salt Lake City company, Eneco
Inc., and Dr. Peter L. Hagelstein, professor of electrical engineering at
M.I.T. and a technical consultant at Eneco, say that their devices improve
the efficiency of the conversion by more than half.

"It's really first-generation, very primitive implementation," Dr.
Hagelstein said. "Potentially, it's an enormous deal. This opens a door."

While the heat generated by car engines and power plants usually does
nothing but warm the surrounding air, scientists have long dreamed of
building so-called thermoelectric devices that can capture the wasted heat
and convert a portion of it into electricity.

Such devices could significantly increase the electrical output of existing
power plants or power the electrical systems of automobiles, replacing
alternators and increasing gas mileage.

The Pentagon, which partly financed the new research, has been interested in
using the devices for silent motors. Operating in reverse, thermoelectric
devices can also be used as refrigerators.

Another advantage of thermoelectric devices is that they produce electricity
without generating additional pollution.

Current thermoelectric technology converts only about 10 percent of the heat
it absorbs into electricity, too inefficient a return for widespread use.
The new devices, however, reach about 17 percent, and Dr. Hagelstein said
future devices should be able to improve upon that significantly.

It is impossible to transform 100 percent of the heat into electricity. The
laws of physics dictate a theoretical maximum of about 50 percent at the
temperature a thermoelectric device operates at. Current commercial
thermoelectric devices, at 10 percent efficiency, get only one-fifth the
maximum. Using the new technology, future devices should be able to achieve
more than half the maximum.

The researchers are presenting their findings at a meeting of the Materials
Research Society in Boston. Scientific papers describing the experiments
have been submitted to the journals Physical Review Letters and Applied
Physics Letters.

If borne out, the findings would be significant, said Dr. George S. Nolas, a
professor of physics at the University of South Florida and an organizer of
a symposium about thermoelectric devices at the Materials Research Society
meeting. Dr. Nolas had not seen the Eneco paper but said the reported
efficiency was high enough to find practical use and "would be pretty good
news."

Eneco's thermoelectric device is a sandwich of three layers of
semiconductor. One outer layer is heated; the other is kept at room
temperature. The middle layer acts as an insulator to maintain the
temperature difference.

The heat causes electrons to shoot out, some crossing the sandwich to
generate an electrical current. The Eneco researchers added impurities - a
process called doping - to the heated layer to increase the flow of
electrons.

"The region near the hot part is heavily doped, so it boils off electrons,"
Dr. Hagelstein said. "We get more voltage and more current."

He added: "The underlying technology is really very simple. It should be a
very practical, relatively cheap technology."

Leroy Becker, marketing director of Eneco, which is not associated with the
Dutch utility Eneco Energie, said the company hoped to produce a prototype
of a practical device within a year and sell it within two years.

Eneco, a privately held company, was created in 1991 to seek to license
patents on cold fusion after the controversial claim of two University of
Utah scientists that they could produce almost limitless amounts of energy
in a room-temperature flask of water. Eneco also financed follow-up research
on cold fusion, including work by Dr. Hagelstein. The claims for cold fusion
were far overstated, and several years ago, Eneco shifted its focus to
thermoelectric devices.


From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Wed Nov 28 06:17:34 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id GAA24262;
	Wed, 28 Nov 2001 06:14:50 -0800
Resent-Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 06:14:50 -0800
Message-Id: <3.0.3.32.20011128091641.007d05d0 alcor.concordia.ca>
X-Sender: simonb alcor.concordia.ca
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.3 (32)
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 09:16:41 -0500
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
From: Bart Simon <simonb alcor.concordia.ca>
Subject: book covers and more
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20011127155222.04040750 pop.mindspring.com>
References: <3.0.3.32.20011127153014.006a4bd4 alcor.concordia.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Resent-Message-ID: <"9fBPB1.0.0x5.Q5F1y" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45406
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

Hi,

Thanks for all the cover ideas so far... I like Bob's shadow/key image or
at least using shadows and light - that is something that might work well
for a simple cover.

Not meaning to goad Jed any further I also like the idea of showing
McKubre's 90 sig XS heat graph (seriously... I wonder if SRI would want to
charge a royalty for using it). I wanted to put a variety of this great
visual data in the book but had to settle for describing as best I could
and citing references (publisher is very strict on graphics).

On to Jed. There's really no reason to be mean but i'll try to respond a
little. Look - I can't win in a debate with Jed over the relation of the
social to the scientific as he's got way more patience for sticking it out
than I (especially via this medium). So in case anyone here cares (which
i'm not sure they do) here is Jed's main point as I see it: 

> You confuse the human process of doing 
>science, which is fraught with culturally based delusions and "idols," with 
>the content of science itself, which (in part at least) transcends the 
>human imagination and the limits of culture. This vital distinction was 
>first described in detail by F. Bacon in the early 1600s. It is the basis 
>of our Civilization, so I think you should learn more about it.

This is definately a solid position and indeed it a majority opinion shared
by some of CF's worst enemies - Huizenga, Close and Park. So to Jed... with
all due respect I am simply going to agree to disagree here - my position
is indeed that the social stuff is caught up in the content of science.
Science as an institutionalized practice attempts to produce truths which
transcend culture but these transcendent truths (such as they are) are
produced and applied in culture...(I'll see your Bacon and raise you one
"later" Wittgenstein plus a William James).

Let me get at this the way I try to in my book - Jed writes:

>If you were to write about 
>scientists who believe in "creationism" you might make a valuable 
>contribution to sociology, but not if you started mixing up their beliefs 
>with biology, and not if you claimed you book was about biology. The people 
>you describe and quote in your paper know nothing about the actual content 
>of cold fusion research, any more than creationists know about biology, or 
>witch doctors know about blood chemistry.

The problem CF research faces (IMO) is that we currently live in a world
where CF researchers are basically considered to be like creationists. The
claim of the skeptics backed up by mainstream institutions and agencies
that hold the purse strings is that CF researchers confuse "faith" with
"science" and are pathological as a result.

Now look - and please don't misinterpret me on this - Jed and I both AGREE
that this position is hogwash (to put it politely) but here our strategies
diverge. Jed maintains that CF researchers are doing the real science while
skeptics are like the creationists and witch doctors whereas I argue that
everyone in this case - the CF researchers and the skeptically minded - are
doing science (I have reasons for why real creationists and witch doctors
are not doing science but that is another argument where Jed and I will
disagree so never mind). 

The idea from my perspective then is to look at the very social and
sometimes very painful process (as for instance, Ed Storms has described in
starting the thread on integrity) of how the truth will out. In this view
the truth is not something waiting to be discovered in some kind of
mythological eureka moment but rather something that is hard won and etched
in scientific papers, demonstrations, beautiful graphs, institutions,
conversations, rhetoric, politics - in all the stuff scientists do on a
daily basis.  This is what my book (and to a lesser extent the essay Jed
describes) attempts to trace... the story of CF is incomplete not because
CF is real and we are all just waiting for everyone else to come to their
senses but because the realness of CF is and still has to be fought out in
very social spaces. 

So I mean for my book to be a sociological compliment to a book like
Beaudette's - i'm not trying to make the case for cold fusion, i'm trying
to make the case for how folks like McKubre and Jed (in his own way) make
the case for cold fusion... and I want to do this without either side
having to be portrayed as evil or insane or irrational or (add your
favorite derogatory term here).

The sad thing about all this is that as hard a time as Jed gives me I get
it worse from some skeptics who think I am some kind of crazed CF lover and
a disgrace to the academic community - for them, to talk of CF as science
is the heresy... whatareyougonnado? Peace brother.

cheers,
Bart

p.s. please go easy on me Jed
------------------------------------------------------
Bart Simon, Asst. Professor
Department of Sociology and Anthropology
Concordia University, LB-687
1455 De Maisonneuve Blvd. W.
Montreal, Quebec, Canada  H3G 1M8

phone: 514-848-2164
email: simonb alcor.concordia.ca
-------------------------------------------------------

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Wed Nov 28 07:50:02 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id HAA28009;
	Wed, 28 Nov 2001 07:47:02 -0800
Resent-Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 07:47:02 -0800
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.1.20011128103525.00b75878 world.std.com>
X-Sender: mica world.std.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 10:46:29 -0500
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
From: Mitchell Swartz <mica world.std.com>
Subject: Re: book covers and more
In-Reply-To: <3.0.3.32.20011128091641.007d05d0 alcor.concordia.ca>
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20011127155222.04040750 pop.mindspring.com>
 <3.0.3.32.20011127153014.006a4bd4 alcor.concordia.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Resent-Message-ID: <"pB12r.0.Pr6.rRG1y" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45407
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 


At 09:16 AM 11/28/2001 -0500, Bart wrote:
> > You confuse the human process of doing
> >science, which is fraught with culturally based delusions and "idols," with
> >the content of science itself, which (in part at least) transcends the
> >human imagination and the limits of culture. This vital distinction was
> >first described in detail by F. Bacon in the early 1600s. It is the basis
> >of our Civilization, so I think you should learn more about it.
>
>This is definately a solid position and indeed it a majority opinion shared
>by some of CF's worst enemies - Huizenga, Close and Park. So to Jed... with
>all due respect I am simply going to agree to disagree here - my position
>is indeed that the social stuff is caught up in the content of science.
>Science as an institutionalized practice attempts to produce truths which
>transcend culture but these transcendent truths (such as they are) are
>produced and applied in culture...(I'll see your Bacon and raise you one
>"later" Wittgenstein plus a William James).


   Science is systematized knowledge, and would include thus logically include
both the data, the generated information; with subsequent criticism of that
--directed to what actually was presented.
    The pathologic skeptics do not do that.

======================================================

>Let me get at this the way I try to in my book - Jed writes:
>
> >If you were to write about
> >scientists who believe in "creationism" you might make a valuable
> >contribution to sociology, but not if you started mixing up their beliefs
> >with biology, and not if you claimed you book was about biology. The people
> >you describe and quote in your paper know nothing about the actual content
> >of cold fusion research, any more than creationists know about biology, or
> >witch doctors know about blood chemistry.
>
>The problem CF research faces (IMO) is that we currently live in a world
>where CF researchers are basically considered to be like creationists. The
>claim of the skeptics backed up by mainstream institutions and agencies
>that hold the purse strings is that CF researchers confuse "faith" with
>"science" and are pathological as a result.


   The CF researchers have developed compelling data and useful information 
which is
generally ignored, because it is not accurately discussed.   Thus, it is 
the pathologic
skeptics who are akin to the creationists. It is they who systematically 
ignore what
is actually presented  -- and instead they respond to their own (often 
incorrect)
notions.

  =======================================================

>Now look - and please don't misinterpret me on this - Jed and I both AGREE
>that this position is hogwash (to put it politely) but here our strategies
>diverge. Jed maintains that CF researchers are doing the real science while
>skeptics are like the creationists and witch doctors whereas I argue that
>everyone in this case - the CF researchers and the skeptically minded - are
>doing science (I have reasons for why real creationists and witch doctors
>are not doing science but that is another argument where Jed and I will
>disagree so never mind).


   Jed is correct in this case.  The pathologic skeptics rarely -if ever- 
discuss what
was actually presented or found, and instead usually rely upon a paragraph 
taken out-of-context, or
an inaccurate summary or analysis by someone else.


    The story of CF is incomplete because the altered curves, and actual 
findings, have been
ignored systematically.  The actual data and information generated has thus 
been ignored
(just as terrorism was for the most part ignored until the 911 atrocity).
  As such, corruption and inaccuracy --rather than truth, science, and 
justice-- have so far won out.

         Dr. Mitchell Swartz






From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Wed Nov 28 08:38:11 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id IAA32150;
	Wed, 28 Nov 2001 08:35:22 -0800
Resent-Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 08:35:22 -0800
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20011128094745.033fbe48 pop.mindspring.com>
X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 10:37:02 -0500
To: vortex-L eskimo.com
From: Jed Rothwell <jedrothwell infinite-energy.com>
Subject: Re: book covers and more
In-Reply-To: <3.0.3.32.20011128091641.007d05d0 alcor.concordia.ca>
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20011127155222.04040750 pop.mindspring.com>
 <3.0.3.32.20011127153014.006a4bd4 alcor.concordia.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Resent-Message-ID: <"BQRrF2.0.wr7.89H1y" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45408
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

Bart Simon wrote:

by some of CF's worst enemies - Huizenga, Close and Park. So to Jed... with
>all due respect I am simply going to agree to disagree here - my position
>is indeed that the social stuff is caught up in the content of science.
>Science as an institutionalized practice attempts to produce truths which
>transcend culture but these transcendent truths (such as they are) . . .

This is true to some extent, but the main content of science are physical 
events that happen in the laboratory. Simon ignores this part. The main 
content of engineering is a bridge that either stands or falls. The design 
of a bridge reflects many fascinating aspects of society in the choice of 
material, the way the bridge fits the landscape (or does not), the location 
of the bridge and whose economic interests it best serves and so on, but at 
the heart of the structure are physical laws that transcend human culture. 
It is as much a work of nature as man. An experiment in a laboratory is 
also a work of nature -- a naturally occurring phenomenon.

You cannot judge the reality of cold fusion without understanding what 
actually occurs in the laboratory, whereas you can judge it quite easily 
while ignoring the social brouhaha it caused, and the opinions of ignorant 
people like Huizenga, Close and Park. One temperature reading overrules 
them. If a bridge will stand, it does not matter that a million engineers 
and physicists claim it will fall. Phenomena exist outside human society, 
and are not affected by it, even when they are brought to light by human 
actions.


>The claim of the skeptics backed up by mainstream institutions and 
>agencies that hold the purse strings is that CF researchers confuse 
>"faith" with "science" and are pathological as a result.

The claims of the CF scientists are backed up by physical facts revealed in 
experiments. The claims of the skeptics have no basis. They do not even 
pretend they have done experiments or examined the data! CF is science; the 
skeptics are practicing a new form of religion. Anyone can tell the difference.


>Jed maintains that CF researchers are doing the real science while
>skeptics are like the creationists and witch doctors whereas I argue that
>everyone in this case - the CF researchers and the skeptically minded - 
>are doing science

No. You can only do science two ways: in the laboratory when you confront 
physical reality (physical events), or outside the laboratory thinking 
about those events. The skeptically minded people have never heard of the 
events in question. They have never seen the data. Park refuses to look at 
it, therefore it is impossible for him to do science. Physics is about 
physical reality.


>The idea from my perspective then is to look at the very social and
>sometimes very painful process (as for instance, Ed Storms has described 
>in starting the thread on integrity) of how the truth will out.

The truth comes out in the laboratory. The painful process may occur later. 
It is proportional to funding and status. Any theory or experiment, no 
matter how outlandish, will be accepted easily as long as it does not hurt 
scientists' income. Things like string theory and multi-world theory can be 
published in Nature without resistance.

There is no profound reason why Huizenga, Close and Park oppose cold fusion 
and embrace hot fusion. That is their job. If we had the money, and the HF 
people were poor, Huizenga would write books attacking them instead. 
Ethics, beliefs and theory have nothing to do with it. People like McKubre 
tell me there are no important theoretical reasons why CF cannot occur, and 
I expect they are right. In any case, theory never overrules facts.


>In this view the truth is not something waiting to be discovered in some 
>kind of mythological eureka moment but rather something that is hard won 
>and etched in scientific papers, demonstrations, beautiful graphs, 
>institutions, conversations, rhetoric, politics . . .

Nonsense. The truth is revealed in physical events in the laboratory. When 
Mizuno's cell remained hot for days and boiled away 37 liters of water, 
that was the truth, now and forever. All the demonstrations, conversations 
and politics in the world will never overrule that event. That heat after 
death event was like a bridge that stands despite predictions, or the 
Wright airplane that flew on December 17, 1903. In the five-year brouhaha 
following the 1903 flight, most people rejected the Wright's claims, and 
the event was almost lost to history, but it DID happen. A photograph 
exists to prove it. I have a trace of Mizuno's cell thermocouple pen 
recorder, and I have the word of him and his colleagues. They are right, 
the rest of the world is wrong, and ten billion arguments will never change 
reality one iota.


>- in all the stuff scientists do on a daily basis.  This is what my book 
>(and to a lesser extent the essay Jed describes) attempts to trace... the 
>story of CF is incomplete not because CF is real and we are all just 
>waiting for everyone else to come to their senses but because the realness 
>of CF is and still has to be fought out in very social spaces.

WRONG, WRONG, WRONG. CF exists only in the physical space of the test tube. 
What happens outside the test tube is irrelevant. The question here is not 
what scientists do on a daily basis, it is what palladium does. Truth may 
be rejected by society, trampled and forgotten, but the story is complete 
now, and CF is as real as any phenomenon can be. It is as certain as the 
fact that the Wright airplane does fly under control. Nature settled the 
argument, with macroscopic events like Mizuno's heat after death, and 
Celani's incandescent wire. Nature is the authority here, not me or 
Huizenga. Some questions are never clearly resolved by experiment. Others, 
such as the airplane, the atom bomb, high temperature superconductivity and 
cold fusion are proved in ways that no one can deny.


>So I mean for my book to be a sociological compliment to a book like
>Beaudette's - i'm not trying to make the case for cold fusion, i'm trying
>to make the case for how folks like McKubre and Jed (in his own way) make 
>the case for cold fusion...

The essay does not discuss how McKubre makes his case. It does not mention 
anything about actual experiments, or the macroscopic events that Mizuno 
and others observed.


>. . . and I want to do this without either side having to be portrayed as 
>evil or insane or irrational or (add your favorite derogatory term here).

Except that the other side actually is evil and irrational. Evil is a real 
thing, not a social convention. To ignore it is to distort history. You 
might as well write about Civil Rights in Georgia and treat the KKK as 
morally equivalent to the hundreds of innocent people they slaughtered and 
mangled in the 20th century. Robert Park is a paid flack for the hot fusion 
industry. He refuses to look at data, which is grossly unethical behavior 
for a scientist. He is like a doctor who prescribes a drug without 
bothering to look at the patient's blood pressure. He has repeatedly lied 
to the news media, pretending that he knows something about CF when in fact 
he deliberately keeps himself ignorant.


>The sad thing about all this is that as hard a time as Jed gives me I get
>it worse from some skeptics who think I am some kind of crazed CF lover 
>and a disgrace to the academic community - for them, to talk of CF as 
>science is the heresy... whatareyougonnado?

What do you think you do?!? Bacon answered that question in 1620: You go to 
the laboratory and look at facts. Nature answers all questions, and settles 
all disputes. There is no other method. The skeptics refuse to do this, 
therefore they are not scientists, by definition. They are a disgrace to 
the academic community.

Schwinger was right. The replacement of impartial reviewing by censorship 
will be the death of science, unless these people are stopped. This *is* a 
fight between good and evil. It is a fight between an ancient and noble 
tradition and modern barbarians. They are the U.S. branch of the Taliban, 
bent on turning back the clock and enforcing conformity by means of terror. 
We are the forces of civilization, enlightenment, comfort, progress and 
human dignity. To preserve their money and power, they trample academic 
freedom. They ridicule, harass and fire researchers for publishing data and 
speaking at conferences, and deliberately keep themselves and the public in 
ignorance. The contrast could not be more stark. If Simon thinks these 
groups are somehow equivalent he is morally blinded by his social theories, 
and trendy notions of "cultural relativity" or some other half-baked notion.

- Jed

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Wed Nov 28 08:44:11 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id IAA05267;
	Wed, 28 Nov 2001 08:43:52 -0800
Resent-Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 08:43:52 -0800
Message-Id: <3.0.3.32.20011128114538.007cfdf0 alcor.concordia.ca>
X-Sender: simonb alcor.concordia.ca
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.3 (32)
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 11:45:38 -0500
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
From: Bart Simon <simonb alcor.concordia.ca>
Subject: Re: book covers and more
In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.1.20011128103525.00b75878 world.std.com>
References: <3.0.3.32.20011128091641.007d05d0 alcor.concordia.ca>
 <5.1.0.14.2.20011127155222.04040750 pop.mindspring.com>
 <3.0.3.32.20011127153014.006a4bd4 alcor.concordia.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Resent-Message-ID: <"oHOnw2.0.9I1.7HH1y" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45409
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

Thanks for your comments Mitch... i'm sorry to grab more bandwidth than
this topic is worth but i'll make one small addendum and then i'll try to
desist. Mitch wrote:

> The story of CF is incomplete because the altered curves, and actual 
>findings, have been
>ignored systematically.  The actual data and information generated has thus 
>been ignored
>(just as terrorism was for the most part ignored until the 911 atrocity).
>  As such, corruption and inaccuracy --rather than truth, science, and 
>justice-- have so far won out.

To be honest I care less about the rantings of folks like Park who acts
more as what I call science-boundary worker (like a Science Cop) than a
scientist (in the sense I try to describe). More important are the editors
and reviewers (and regular front line scientists) who unfairly reject CF
articles by Ed and others but I think there is more to this than corruption
and conspiracy (although I am convinced there is definately some conspiracy
involved)... 

The skeptically minded normal scientists are in part able to dismiss
current CF claims because as a consequence of history (1989-90) they
believe the work of CF researchers is a priori wrong so that in the same
way that scientists tend to throw creation science papers in the trash they
also do the same with CF papers not bothering to even consider the
difference. I don't even get the sense that regular run of the mill
scientists give CF a second thought let alone conspire to keep CF research
down. So its not that folks ignore the data so much as they don't even
consider the data to be data in the first place. I think this is far more
intriguing than the idea that folks purposefully choose to ignore CF
data... in my experience human beings simply aren't that reflective.

Finally, what fascinates me about the CF case is that despite all the
hardship CF researchers keep on trucking (I argue in part because
researchers are not working alone and in part because experimental evidence
on a collective level is improving) and this indicates to me that science
(at least in the late 20th century) is more porous to contradictory beliefs
than sociologists and philosophers have previously thought. For my money CF
has proven to be a rather highly successful case of marginalized science
(considering all the claims out there we could choose from) comparable
perhaps to parapsychology (which survives not too badly through its own set
of institutions) but also to the theory of continental drift which managed
to hang in there despite years of "ignoring the data."

cheers,
Bart
------------------------------------------------------
Bart Simon, Asst. Professor
Department of Sociology and Anthropology
Concordia University, LB-687
1455 De Maisonneuve Blvd. W.
Montreal, Quebec, Canada  H3G 1M8

phone: 514-848-2164
email: simonb alcor.concordia.ca
-------------------------------------------------------

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Wed Nov 28 08:52:05 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id IAA10114;
	Wed, 28 Nov 2001 08:51:16 -0800
Resent-Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 08:51:16 -0800
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 11:59:00 -0500 (EST)
From: John Schnurer <herman antioch-college.edu>
To: Vortex <vortex-l eskimo.com>
Subject: When was the Pentagon built?
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1011128115747.25025A-100000 college.antioch-college.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Resent-Message-ID: <"SkzC_2.0.xT2.3OH1y" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45410
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 


	Please:

	Q:  Does anyone know when the Pentagon was built?


			Thank you

					JHS

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Wed Nov 28 09:02:05 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id IAA15747;
	Wed, 28 Nov 2001 08:58:50 -0800
Resent-Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 08:58:50 -0800
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <a05100300b82a34973f0c [4.46.76.120]>
In-Reply-To: <3.0.3.32.20011127153014.006a4bd4 alcor.concordia.ca>
References: <3.0.3.32.20011127153014.006a4bd4 alcor.concordia.ca>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 10:59:25 -0600
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
From: thomas malloy <temalloy metro.lakes.com>
Subject: Re: cover ideas for my cold fusion book
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
Resent-Message-ID: <"KFMMW1.0.or3.9VH1y" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45411
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

>Hello Bart;
>
>Anyway.. content issues aside my editor has now asked about what I would
>like to see for the cover of the book and this being my first book and
>all...

Hum, the socialogy of cold fusion, eh?

What exactly are you going to write about? Socialogy is about people, 
and LENR's are about atoms. I don't see the connection. Unless your 
about going to investigate main stream scientists total refusal to 
look at the evidence that something anomolous is happening. If this 
is the case, I would nominate Robert Parks with a balloom comming out 
of his mouth with "I don't care about your isotopic ratios."


>  i'm stumped. So keeping in mind that this book is about the social
>and cultural aspects of the controversy (although I try to be as accurate
>as possible with respect to techical issues)


I wrote the above paragraph before reading Jed's critique of your 
manuscript. Apparently you don't accept that anything anomolous is 
happening. Well go ask someone in the chemistry department about 
isotopic ratios, The reason I use the word anomolous is because 
higher than usual concentrations of the rare, isotopes that occur in 
nature in the 2% range, don't occur in nature. They can be produced 
one atom at a time in a high energy collider or a nuclear reactor, 
but various researchers are reporting them from the LENR experiments 
in question. So go figure.

>  do any of you have any ideas
>for a good cover - images, artwork, photographs, graphics?  For the moment
>i'll assume that cost is no issue (although it is - basically the publisher
>won't go for anything they need to pay for) because for now i'm just
>looking for ideas.


I'd like to suggest that you read Structure of Scientific Revolutions 
by Thomas Kuhn. I'd also like to call your attention to an 
International Patent by Piantelli, While that machine was not 
economically feasible, there is no question that it was fusioning H 
and D in to He3 with the production of energy at 100+ C temperatures.

>
>Thanks for your help.
>Bart
>
>
>phone: 514-848-2164
>fax: 514-848-4539
>=========================================


-- 

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Wed Nov 28 09:26:48 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id JAA01906;
	Wed, 28 Nov 2001 09:23:52 -0800
Resent-Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 09:23:52 -0800
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20011128115051.00aba4c8 pop.mindspring.com>
X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 12:23:49 -0500
To: vortex-l eskimo.com, vortex-l@eskimo.com
From: Jed Rothwell <jedrothwell infinite-energy.com>
Subject: Re: book covers and more
In-Reply-To: <3.0.3.32.20011128114538.007cfdf0 alcor.concordia.ca>
References: <4.3.2.7.1.20011128103525.00b75878 world.std.com>
 <3.0.3.32.20011128091641.007d05d0 alcor.concordia.ca>
 <5.1.0.14.2.20011127155222.04040750 pop.mindspring.com>
 <3.0.3.32.20011127153014.006a4bd4 alcor.concordia.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Resent-Message-ID: <"92nU71.0.eT.dsH1y" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45412
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

Bart Simon wrote:

>More important are the editors and reviewers (and regular front line 
>scientists) who unfairly reject CF articles by Ed and others but I think 
>there is more to this than corruption and conspiracy (although I am 
>convinced there is definately some conspiracy involved)...

It is mainly intellectual laziness. They do not bother to read the papers. 
Their comments in the rejection letters reveal they do not read the papers 
and know nothing about them.


>The skeptically minded normal scientists are in part able to dismiss
>current CF claims because as a consequence of history (1989-90) they
>believe the work of CF researchers is a priori wrong so that in the same
>way that scientists tend to throw creation science papers in the trash . . .

There is a gigantic difference between a biologist who rejects creationism 
and a "normal minded scientist" who dismisses CF! The biologist knows his 
field in detail, and he can give you reasons for his beliefs. The "normal 
minded scientist" is not acting as a scientist at all. He knows nothing 
about the CF data -- he does not even realize that it exists. You cannot 
judge data you have never heard of.


>I don't even get the sense that regular run of the mill scientists give CF 
>a second thought let alone conspire to keep CF research down.

No, they do not. A few powerful people censor the information and keep the 
run of the mill scientists in the dark.


>So its not that folks ignore the data so much as they don't even consider 
>the data to be data in the first place.

Make that: they who don't even know the data exists in the first place. It 
is not their fault that the DoE and the APS is persecuting researchers and 
censoring scientists. On the other hand, when a thousand members of the APS 
applauded Robert Park and others who made venomous, bigoted attacks against 
Pons and Fleischmann, that crowd of people *was* guilty. Not a single 
person in that crowd stood up and said "wait a minute, let us be a little 
more open minded, mistakes are an okay part of science." A scientist, 
doctor or engineer should know his business. He has a professional 
obligation to follow the rules and stick to traditions, and to defend his 
profession against corruption.


>I think this is far more intriguing than the idea that folks purposefully 
>choose to ignore CF data... in my experience human beings simply aren't 
>that reflective.

Some are reflective, and some are not. People who not reflective should not 
become scientists, but many do. People who are not empathetic should not 
become doctors, but some do.


>Finally, what fascinates me about the CF case is that despite all the 
>hardship CF researchers keep on trucking (I argue in part because 
>researchers are not working alone  and in part because experimental 
>evidence on a collective level is improving)

There are two other very important reasons:

1. People are naturally curious and explorative. That is why they spread to 
all continents. Eons ago some people risked their lives to cross the Bering 
Strait and populate North America. Today, some will risk thousands of 
dollars, their reputations and careers in a dogged effort to satisfy their 
own curiosity.

2. CF may lead to a gigantic financial reward. It may rescue the Earth from 
destruction by global warming. It is an important cause, beyond the 
scientific considerations.


>and this indicates to me that science
>(at least in the late 20th century) is more porous to contradictory beliefs
>than sociologists and philosophers have previously thought.

It is less porous than it used to be, or than it ought to be. This is an 
ominous trend.


>For my money CF has proven to be a rather highly successful case of 
>marginalized science (considering all the claims out there we could choose 
>from) comparable perhaps to parapsychology (which survives not too badly 
>through its own set of institutions) but also to the theory of continental 
>drift which managed to hang in there despite years of "ignoring the data."

The data for parapsychology is very close to the noise. (It may be in the 
noise, for all I know.) It has to be mathematically massaged, like the Top 
Quark data. Some of the data for CF is miles above the noise, and some is 
macroscopic, dramatic, and undeniable, like Mizuno's heat after death. 
Parapsychology is supposedly difficult to reproduce, whereas some CF 
experiments, performed repeatedly by world-class organizations such as 
Mitsubishi, Los Alamos, the NRL and the ENEA, are 100% reproducible. The 
two fields are vastly different. CF has far more credibility.

The evidence for continental drift was apparent to anyone with a map and a 
pair of scissors, it seems to me. I do not understand why anyone ever 
denied it.

- Jed

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Wed Nov 28 09:35:54 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id JAA10909;
	Wed, 28 Nov 2001 09:34:50 -0800
Resent-Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 09:34:50 -0800
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20011128122634.033fd860 pop.mindspring.com>
X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 12:34:49 -0500
To: vortex-l eskimo.com, vortex-l@eskimo.com
From: Jed Rothwell <jedrothwell infinite-energy.com>
Subject: Re: cover ideas for my cold fusion book
In-Reply-To: <a05100300b82a34973f0c [4.46.76.120]>
References: <3.0.3.32.20011127153014.006a4bd4 alcor.concordia.ca>
 <3.0.3.32.20011127153014.006a4bd4 alcor.concordia.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Resent-Message-ID: <"kC2Lp2.0.Dg2.v0I1y" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45413
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

thomas malloy wrote:

>I wrote the above paragraph before reading Jed's critique of your 
>manuscript. Apparently you don't accept that anything anomolous is happening.

I think it would fairer to say he does not discuss or consider the 
possibility that anything anomalous is happening. This would be perfectly 
okay if his essay was strictly about the sociology of CF, and it did not 
purport to discuss or decide the actual content.

I have written essays about people who doubted that the Wright brothers 
flew in 1903, and others who supported them, and about the social effects 
of nascent aviation. That is different from writing about actual flight tests.

By the way, my critique was published here weeks ago. Also, people who have 
not read Simon's essay should not endorse my critique. Perhaps I 
misunderstand Simon's point. He never responded or denied my restatement of 
his position, so I assume he actually does believe we can judge the reality 
of CF by watching scientist's social behavior. I have read similar notions 
in magazines and journals. I think that is a trendy idea in sociology today.

- Jed

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Wed Nov 28 09:39:45 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id JAA14217;
	Wed, 28 Nov 2001 09:38:33 -0800
Resent-Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 09:38:33 -0800
X-Authentication-Warning: eskimo.com: lajoie owned process doing -bs
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 09:38:30 -0800 (PST)
From: Stephen Lajoie <lajoie eskimo.com>
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Re: book covers and more
In-Reply-To: <3.0.3.32.20011128091641.007d05d0 alcor.concordia.ca>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.96.1011128091657.10149B-100000 eskimo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Resent-Message-ID: <"qwrNE3.0.rT3.P4I1y" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45414
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

On Wed, 28 Nov 2001, Bart Simon wrote:

> The problem CF research faces (IMO) is that we currently live in a world
> where CF researchers are basically considered to be like creationists.

How ironic. 

Physicist and Biologist use facts and data to show how the univers, and
then the earth and life on earth, formed and evololved. Creationist start
from the presumption that God made the world, and then work backwards to
explain why the physicist and biologist are wrong with innane arguments
like "the devil is trying to delude you"

Cold fusion research produces fusion ash, heat consistant with that ash
finding, nuclear transformations, and low levels of gammas and neutrons.
Cold fusion skepticts start with the presumption that there is no fusion
and then work backwards to explain that all the findings are errors; magic
leaks, damn lies and statistics, ridicule, and out and out hate. 

And, ironically, compare the CF researcher to a creationist.

> The
> claim of the skeptics backed up by mainstream institutions and agencies
> that hold the purse strings is that CF researchers confuse "faith" with
> "science" and are pathological as a result.

This is called "projection". People accuse others of doing what they
themselves do.
 
> Now look - and please don't misinterpret me on this - Jed and I both AGREE
> that this position is hogwash (to put it politely) but here our strategies
> diverge.

Does Jed know you agree? 

> Jed maintains that CF researchers are doing the real science while
> skeptics are like the creationists and witch doctors whereas I argue that
> everyone in this case - the CF researchers and the skeptically minded - are
> doing science (I have reasons for why real creationists and witch doctors
> are not doing science but that is another argument where Jed and I will
> disagree so never mind). 

Can you show that the skeptics are doing science? I can show that they are
not. 

I'm discovering that most people don't even know what science IS. I bought
a book off Barnes and Nobel via the web on the scientific method and the
author got it completely and utterly WRONG. You talk to others and they
think it's about getting degrees and being published in refereed journals. 

(BTW, there was a person who wrote a spoof paper about absolutly NOTHING
and he got it published in a reputable journal. That most journal articles
are not worth reading was claimed by no less than Feynman himself!) 

> The idea from my perspective then is to look at the very social and
> sometimes very painful process (as for instance, Ed Storms has described in
> starting the thread on integrity) of how the truth will out. In this view
> the truth is not something waiting to be discovered in some kind of
> mythological eureka moment but rather something that is hard won and etched
> in scientific papers, demonstrations, beautiful graphs, institutions,
> conversations, rhetoric, politics - in all the stuff scientists do on a
> daily basis.  This is what my book (and to a lesser extent the essay Jed
> describes) attempts to trace... the story of CF is incomplete not because
> CF is real and we are all just waiting for everyone else to come to their
> senses but because the realness of CF is and still has to be fought out in
> very social spaces. 

There are people who still don't buy Special and General Relativity. Lots
of people don't buy Evolution. So what? 

> So I mean for my book to be a sociological compliment to a book like
> Beaudette's - i'm not trying to make the case for cold fusion, i'm trying
> to make the case for how folks like McKubre and Jed (in his own way) make
> the case for cold fusion... and I want to do this without either side
> having to be portrayed as evil or insane or irrational or (add your
> favorite derogatory term here).

The skeptics ARE irrational. 

Look, most people go into science to appear smart. Appearing smart is not
as easy as being smart, and even if you ARE smart, that has nothing to do
with the scientific method. People who have this social need to appear
smart are not likely to do science that requires them to advance an
unpopular opionion.

The history of science is FILLED with people like this. Check out any
great discovery that seemes counter intuitive, and you will find
"scientist" who attacked it.

Now, that works the other way around too, and you find people's who's need
to appear smart motivates them to do dumb things; like cheat. They tend to
come out with fraudulant "discoveries". I could name a few, but some are
near and dear to the hearts of many of this list. I've made an effort to
scrub these unusual ideas to find the good from the bad.

Oddly, some are legit with total BS as an explaination, like, well, the
electric rocket. The real reason why it works is something else. 

> The sad thing about all this is that as hard a time as Jed gives me I get
> it worse from some skeptics who think I am some kind of crazed CF lover and
> a disgrace to the academic community - for them, to talk of CF as science
> is the heresy... whatareyougonnado? Peace brother.

Good luck in your work. 

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Wed Nov 28 09:45:41 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id JAA19186;
	Wed, 28 Nov 2001 09:44:17 -0800
Resent-Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 09:44:17 -0800
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20011128123749.033fbe48 pop.mindspring.com>
X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 12:44:15 -0500
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
From: Jed Rothwell <jedrothwell infinite-energy.com>
Subject: Re: N.Y. Times article
In-Reply-To: <003b01c177ec$5bc4dce0$c98f209a ggrf30j>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Resent-Message-ID: <"AO7s82.0.ih4.n9I1y" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45415
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: RO
X-Status: 

This breakthrough in thermoelectric (TEG) devices by Kucherov & Hagelstein 
is a very noteworthy development in its own right. The portrayal of CF in 
the article is inaccurate and unfair, but any publicity is good publicity.

These TEG will be very handy if CF can be developed.

This article distorts the facts about TEGs too.

I believe Kucherov and Hagelstein think their new technology may ultimately 
allow TEGs with 40% efficiency, which would beat nearly all conventional 
heat engine technology. Aeroderivative gas turbines can do better, but they 
cost a ton of money for the equipment & maintenance, and they do not last 
long. A TEG generator may last for decades, even in a hostile environment, 
such as deep space.

- Jed

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Wed Nov 28 09:55:17 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id JAA25305;
	Wed, 28 Nov 2001 09:52:32 -0800
Resent-Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 09:52:32 -0800
Message-Id: <3.0.3.32.20011128125423.007e88b0 alcor.concordia.ca>
X-Sender: simonb alcor.concordia.ca
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.3 (32)
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 12:54:23 -0500
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
From: Bart Simon <simonb alcor.concordia.ca>
Subject: clarification... on anomalousness
In-Reply-To: <a05100300b82a34973f0c [4.46.76.120]>
References: <3.0.3.32.20011127153014.006a4bd4 alcor.concordia.ca>
 <3.0.3.32.20011127153014.006a4bd4 alcor.concordia.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Resent-Message-ID: <"bTh-K3.0.JB6.WHI1y" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45416
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

Sorry for this -- I need to make another clarification... I apologize if my
explanation of what I am arguing remains unclear.

Thomas Malloy wrote:

>I wrote the above paragraph before reading Jed's critique of your 
>manuscript. Apparently you don't accept that anything anomolous is 
>happening. 

Very crucially this is NOT what I am arguing. Indeed in the case of cold
fusion something very anomalous is happening and if it helps you to know
this I have done some grunt work in a lab helping with some basic CF
experiments and I've experienced this anomalousness (especially when the
scientist I was working with explained it to me). For me and for you the CF
effects are real where we differ is in just how to understand what this
reality is. For you and Jed reality is self-evident (a given) for me it is
constructed (and this is very very different from cultural relativism but
again i'll skip that one). In terms of what pragmatically matters we are
all on the same side of the fence - we all believe in the legitimacy of CF
research (and we try to support that legitimacy in various ways).

What I am arguing contra Jed is that the real anomalousness of cold fusion
is not self-evident in the performance of an experiment or the rendering of
a nice graph and that what counts as anomalous for both CF researchers and
skeptically minded scientists depends on interpretations and arguments that
are grounded in researchers' background experience, knowledge, skill, and
interactions with others. I have talked with enough scientists now to feel
confident in asserting that the data does not just tell things as they
are... reality ("truth" is a better term here but the philosophers refer to
this as certified knowledge as opposed to mere belief) is made by both the
people and the data together.

Let me offer Jed's reply to this -- WRONG, WRONG, WRONG...

Ah... For those interested may I recommend a version of the debate Jed and
I are having that starts with an interesting edited book.

Noretta Koertge (ed.) A House Built on Sand: Exposing Postmodernist Myths
about Science (Oxford 1998).

This title would seemingly support Jed's view of things until you see a
paper in there by William McKinney called, "Where Experiments Fail: Is
"Cold Fusion" Science as Normal?"  This paper takes Jed's (and Mitch's and
Thomas') view of science and truth but using this argues that cold fusion
is not real and the cultural relativist position is to treat it as if it
was so. 

A reply to this paper is offered by Trevor Pinch in the April 1999 issue
(Vol 29, no. 2) of the journal Social Studies of Science and this is
followed by a counter-strike from McKinney in the same journal. In this
instance, Pinch and I share similar views.

If not for any other reason, taking a glance at this debate will give you
some indication of why the cold fusion case is so important for
sociologists, philosophers and historians of science. I thank you for all
your reading suggestions but we are well beyond Bacon, Kuhn and Popper now
folks (i'm sorry if that sounded mean... I actually love Bacon and Kuhn...
its standard reading where I come from).

cheers,
Bart


------------------------------------------------------
Bart Simon, Asst. Professor
Department of Sociology and Anthropology
Concordia University, LB-687
1455 De Maisonneuve Blvd. W.
Montreal, Quebec, Canada  H3G 1M8

phone: 514-848-2164
email: simonb alcor.concordia.ca
-------------------------------------------------------

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Wed Nov 28 10:37:09 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id KAA25611;
	Wed, 28 Nov 2001 10:34:35 -0800
Resent-Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 10:34:35 -0800
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20011128130824.03476008 pop.mindspring.com>
X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 13:34:32 -0500
To: vortex-l eskimo.com, vortex-l@eskimo.com
From: Jed Rothwell <jedrothwell infinite-energy.com>
Subject: Re: clarification... on anomalousness
In-Reply-To: <3.0.3.32.20011128125423.007e88b0 alcor.concordia.ca>
References: <a05100300b82a34973f0c [4.46.76.120]>
 <3.0.3.32.20011127153014.006a4bd4 alcor.concordia.ca>
 <3.0.3.32.20011127153014.006a4bd4 alcor.concordia.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Resent-Message-ID: <"OZhQV1.0.0G6.wuI1y" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45417
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

Bart Simon wrote:

>What I am arguing contra Jed is that the real anomalousness of cold fusion 
>is not self-evident in the performance of an experiment or the rendering 
>of a nice graph

That depends on the experiment. Some are self-evident, others are not. Some 
require careful analysis and interpretation, others produce such a huge 
effect, they constitute visceral or visible proof of heat beyond the limits 
of chemistry. Examples of the latter are rare, but common enough that we 
can be sure they are real. They include Mizuno's heat after death incident, 
the close-up video of the P&F boil-off, and Celani's recent incandescent cell.

This is a very important concept. Some demonstrations are complete and 
self-evident, contrary to Simon's claim. You do not need instruments or any 
understanding of theory to see that an airplane flies and Mizuno's cell 
went beyond chemistry. A caveman watching the performance of that cell 
would understand the implications as clearly as any scientist or engineer 
alive today. He would know this is more heat than any fire can produce. 
Primitive people understood this concept because they had to stoke fires 
all day. That is why the miracle of the Chanukah candles is described in 
the Bible.

There are graphs which show such good data that only a fool would argue 
with them. However, they still require some level of interpretation or 
analysis, which makes qualitatively different from the heat-after-death 
incident. A graph is not an actual physical event that happens before your 
eyes, and convinces you by its nature.


>. . . and that what counts as anomalous for both CF researchers and
>skeptically minded scientists depends on interpretations and arguments 
>that are grounded in researchers' background experience, knowledge, skill, 
>and interactions with others.

None of this applies to the self-evident macroscopic events. It takes no 
knowledge or skill to see that a wire suddenly starts to glow white, or to 
look at it later and see it melted. I suppose you have to know that the 
input power has not changed, and cannot cause the event anyway. (The power 
supplies will not go that high.) Still, any sane person would see it, 
realize what it means, and run for the door, which is what Celani did.

- Jed

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Wed Nov 28 12:01:27 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id LAA31275;
	Wed, 28 Nov 2001 11:58:35 -0800
Resent-Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 11:58:35 -0800
Message-ID: <3C0541C4.99D32196 ix.netcom.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 11:57:56 -0800
From: Akira Kawasaki <aki ix.netcom.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en]C-CCK-MCD NSCPCD472  (Win95; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Re: When was the Pentagon built?
References: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1011128115747.25025A-100000 college.antioch-college.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Resent-Message-ID: <"p47j22.0.We7.g7K1y" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45418
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

WWII era. I guess

John Schnurer wrote:

>         Please:
>
>         Q:  Does anyone know when the Pentagon was built?
>
>                         Thank you
>
>                                         JHS

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Wed Nov 28 12:56:14 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id MAA00392;
	Wed, 28 Nov 2001 12:53:40 -0800
Resent-Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 12:53:40 -0800
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20011128150414.033fdde0 pop.mindspring.com>
X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 15:53:22 -0500
To: vortex-L eskimo.com
From: Jed Rothwell <jedrothwell infinite-energy.com>
Subject: No Eureka moments?
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Resent-Message-ID: <"gTHd22.0.k5.IxK1y" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45419
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: RO
X-Status: 

One of Simon's most important arguments is here: "In this view the truth is 
not something waiting to be discovered in some kind of mythological eureka 
moment but rather something that is hard won and etched in scientific 
papers, demonstrations, beautiful graphs, institutions, conversations, 
rhetoric, politics . . ."

This has been a common theme in recent years. Simon expresses it well here. 
When you chop off the "rhetoric, politics" part, I agree. This is how some 
types of scientific research. Here is a good example, from the public 
relations page of the Fermilab reactor:

"We discovered the top quark not in one lightning stroke, but over a long 
period of time, event by event," says physicist Nick Hadley, a DZero 
collaborator. "No single piece of evidence, no matter how strong, was 
enough to let us claim a discovery. We couldn't be sure we had found the 
top quark until we had seen so many events with the right characteristics 
that there was almost no chance the statistics were fooling us into making 
a false claim."


I have sometimes poked fun at the top quark, but as far as I know it is 
legitimate, and this statement describes a perfectly good way to do research.

In other types of research, people *do* experience Eureka moments. This is 
what Simon fails to understand. In some cases people see dramatic proof 
which erases all doubt that they are confronted with a novel, important, 
phenomenon, and the experiment really did work. Chemists tell me that most 
of their experiments are like this -- it works or it doesn't, and you know 
instantly, by a color change, a burst of heat, or something like that. 
Famous examples of Eureka moments are often described in history books, 
such as the moment the first fission reactor went operational in Chicago in 
1942, or the first test of a long distance telegraph, or a transistor 
feedback test in December 1947. One AT&T researcher remained unconvinced 
that the first transistor was actually amplifying. He said, "Look boys, 
there's one sure test of an amplifier, that you aren't kidding yourselves. 
An amplifier, if fed back on itself . . . will oscillate. This shows that 
it is really producing power -- more than you put in." Brattain did the 
test, and the scope showed it was oscillating. Eureka!

Engineering always produces Eureka moments. The bridge stands up to 
traffic; the computer program executes correctly; the radar detects the 
airplane; the second Model T rolls off the production line a minute after 
the first one. Granted, these are routine, predictable events, but they do 
confirm the original hypothesis that set the project in motion.

Perhaps Simon thinks such definitive moments are becoming rarer in today's 
research environment, or perhaps he does not believe the history books. In 
any case, he is wrong about CF. There have been some highly dramatic 
moments, such as when Pons and Fleischmann demonstrated boiling cells, and 
the morning of April 25, 1991, when Mizuno and Ohmori saw the thermocouple 
pen recorder trace from the cell they had turned off the day before, and 
then felt the cell. Beyond these stark Eureka moments, there have been more 
prosaic but equally convincing tests, such as the sixth, seventh and eighth 
replication in a row at Mitsubishi, at which point things begin to feel 
routine. As Fleischmann said, "when you see it happen often enough, you 
begin to get used to the idea. It is like riding an old bicycle."

Simon's blanket statements about the "mythological eureka moment" and his 
comparison of parapsychology to CF indicate that he does not recognize 
distinctions. He lumps all the different ways of doing science, and the 
different fields, into one box. Actually, there is enormous variety of 
means, methods and attitudes. Some depend on replication and experiment, 
others don't care about replication, others do only observations 
(astronomy). Some must wait months for a statistical picture to emerge (the 
top quark), others decide the issue with a single test showing an 
oscillation on an oscilloscope (the transistor). Because the goals and 
tools are different, methods and attitudes are as varied as they are in 
other institutions, such as agriculture and education. You use one method 
to teach small children, another for college students, and another for 
prisoners serving hard time. Some kinds of science do produce Eureka 
moments, others do not. Fortunately, cold fusion does, which puts it on a 
much firmer basis than, say, psychology, parapsychology or sociology.

- Jed

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Wed Nov 28 13:03:25 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id NAA06801;
	Wed, 28 Nov 2001 13:02:36 -0800
Resent-Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 13:02:36 -0800
Message-ID: <3C0551BD.A154CFDD bellsouth.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 16:06:05 -0500
From: Terry Blanton <commengr bellsouth.net>
Organization: .
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Re: When was the Pentagon built?
References: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1011128115747.25025A-100000 college.antioch-college.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Resent-Message-ID: <"7o_Y_2.0.Bg1.h3L1y" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45420
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

John Schnurer wrote:
> 
>         Please:
> 
>         Q:  Does anyone know when the Pentagon was built?
> 
>                         Thank you
> 
>                                         JHS

First occupancy:  30 April 1942

Completion:  15 January 1943

Terry

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Wed Nov 28 14:15:44 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id OAA26610;
	Wed, 28 Nov 2001 14:13:08 -0800
Resent-Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 14:13:08 -0800
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 14:10:06 -0800 (PST)
From: hank scudder <hjscudde newton.csun.edu>
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Re: When was the Pentagon built?
In-Reply-To: <3C0551BD.A154CFDD bellsouth.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0111281408420.21093-100000 newton.csun.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Resent-Message-ID: <"0Iepi1.0.hV6.p5M1y" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45421
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 


John,
There was a recent ducumentary, on the History Channel I believe, and it
said that construction was started in 1940, or 1941.

Hank



On Wed, 28 Nov 2001, Terry Blanton wrote:

> John Schnurer wrote:
> > 
> >         Please:
> > 
> >         Q:  Does anyone know when the Pentagon was built?
> > 
> >                         Thank you
> > 
> >                                         JHS
> 
> First occupancy:  30 April 1942
> 
> Completion:  15 January 1943
> 
> Terry
> 

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Wed Nov 28 14:38:29 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id OAA14531;
	Wed, 28 Nov 2001 14:35:52 -0800
Resent-Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 14:35:52 -0800
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 17:43:37 -0500 (EST)
From: John Schnurer <herman antioch-college.edu>
To: Vortex <vortex-l eskimo.com>
Subject: Looking for Morey B King  E mail 
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1011128174047.14259G-100000 college.antioch-college.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: MULTIPART/REPORT; REPORT-TYPE=delivery-status; BOUNDARY="fASLqRf15877.1006984347/college.antioch-college.edu"
Content-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1011128174047.14259H college.antioch-college.edu>
Resent-Message-ID: <"VPnXk3.0.tY3.8RM1y" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45422
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

  This message is in MIME format.  The first part should be readable text,
  while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.
  Send mail to mime docserver.cac.washington.edu for more info.

--fASLqRf15877.1006984347/college.antioch-college.edu
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Content-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1011128174047.14259I college.antioch-college.edu>



	Anyone please, know how to find the correct E mail for Morey B
King ?



mbking42 earthlink.net is all I have and it does not seem to work.


--fASLqRf15877.1006984347/college.antioch-college.edu--

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Wed Nov 28 17:27:23 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id RAA02991;
	Wed, 28 Nov 2001 17:27:00 -0800
Resent-Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 17:27:00 -0800
From: Robin van Spaandonk <rvanspaa bigpond.net.au>
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Re: clarification... on anomalousness
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 12:26:22 +1100
Organization: Improving
Message-ID: <jk3b0us8i8n8jthgh4t3opn7ann34d70c3 4ax.com>
References: <a05100300b82a34973f0c [4.46.76.120]> <3.0.3.32.20011127153014.006a4bd4@alcor.concordia.ca> <3.0.3.32.20011127153014.006a4bd4@alcor.concordia.ca> <3.0.3.32.20011128125423.007e88b0@alcor.concordia.ca> <5.1.0.14.2.20011128130824.03476008@pop.min
dspring.com>
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20011128130824.03476008 pop.mindspring.com>
X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.553
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id RAA02965
Resent-Message-ID: <"PaaGG3.0.ak.ZxO1y" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45424
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: RO
X-Status: 

In reply to  Jed Rothwell's message of Wed, 28 Nov 2001 13:34:32 -0500:
[snip]
>input power has not changed, and cannot cause the event anyway. (The power 
>supplies will not go that high.) Still, any sane person would see it, 
>realize what it means, and run for the door, which is what Celani did.
[snip]
Hi Jed,

Where is this written up?


Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/

....Put the "bottom line" at the top!

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Wed Nov 28 17:28:12 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id RAA02014;
	Wed, 28 Nov 2001 17:25:43 -0800
Resent-Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 17:25:43 -0800
From: Robin van Spaandonk <rvanspaa bigpond.net.au>
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Re: book covers and more
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 12:25:05 +1100
Organization: Improving
Message-ID: <lm2b0ugm1dhjtki439mcpo1jevvg5nf2j8 4ax.com>
References: <4.3.2.7.1.20011128103525.00b75878 world.std.com> <3.0.3.32.20011128091641.007d05d0@alcor.concordia.ca> <5.1.0.14.2.20011127155222.04040750@pop.mindspring.com> <3.0.3.32.20011127153014.006a4bd4@alcor.concordia.ca> <3.0.3.32.20011128114538.007c
fdf0 alcor.concordia.ca> <5.1.0.14.2.20011128115051.00aba4c8@pop.mindspring.com>
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20011128115051.00aba4c8 pop.mindspring.com>
X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.553
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id RAA01968
Resent-Message-ID: <"_WXxO1.0.MV.MwO1y" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45423
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

In reply to  Jed Rothwell's message of Wed, 28 Nov 2001 12:23:49 -0500:
[snip]
>Make that: they who don't even know the data exists in the first place. It 
>is not their fault that the DoE and the APS is persecuting researchers and 
>censoring scientists. On the other hand, when a thousand members of the APS 
>applauded Robert Park and others who made venomous, bigoted attacks against 
>Pons and Fleischmann, that crowd of people *was* guilty. 

Now a photo of this event would make a good book cover ;)

>Not a single 
>person in that crowd stood up and said "wait a minute, let us be a little 
>more open minded, mistakes are an okay part of science." A scientist, 
>doctor or engineer should know his business. He has a professional 
>obligation to follow the rules and stick to traditions, and to defend his 
>profession against corruption.
[snip]

Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/

....Put the "bottom line" at the top!

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Wed Nov 28 19:39:15 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id TAA15523;
	Wed, 28 Nov 2001 19:36:39 -0800
Resent-Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 19:36:39 -0800
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Standing Bear <rockcast net-link.net>
To: vortex-l eskimo.com, Horace <blutransform@wp.pl>
Subject: Re: Latest email virus plague: badtransB
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 22:38:31 -0500
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2]
References: <Pine.SUN.3.96.1011125174034.8856A-100000 eskimo.com> <5.1.0.14.2.20011126204008.0302b0d8@pop3.wp.pl>
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20011126204008.0302b0d8 pop3.wp.pl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <01112822383101.00971 tyrannosaur>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Resent-Message-ID: <"KLIZ.0.To3.6rQ1y" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45425
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: RO
X-Status: 

On Monday 26 November 2001 14:43, Horace wrote:
> After reading the following article, more of us might join the club of
> Stephen Lajoie...
>
> <http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A1436-2001Nov22.html>http://
>www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A1436-2001Nov22.html
>
> At 17:51 2001-11-26, Stephen Lajoie you wrote:
> >On Sun, 25 Nov 2001, William Beaty wrote:
> >>  It spreads fast because it can use some versions of MS Outlook
> >> to run itself when viewed (without the victim having to open the
> >> infected attachments.)
> >
> >I've had it with Micorsoft. Unix had anticipated and worked out the
> >problems with this, and Microsoft went ahead and made a virus enhanced
> >operating system. They can't say they didn't know, they knew about Unix.
> >It appears their motivation was to make it possible to force unwanted
> >advertising on the computer user.
> >
> >When are people going to wake up and switch to linux? I have my system on
> >dual boot; unfortunatly, I need Windows for Mathcad and similar programs.
> >I'm not buying that Windows XP, that's just gasoline on the fire.

Horace,
	For some, like me, you are preaching to the choir;  but for others
who are stuck with the 'comfortable' old windows, the new windows may
shock them not a little bit the first time that they have to go begging to
Microsoft to allow them to use the software that they 'bought'.........the
'authorization' from them to open 'XP' for use for more than 14 or so days.
The real losers are those who bought Packard-Bell type machines with
XP installed and only a 'recovery disk' for a backup.  Boy are they gonna
flip when they upgrade a processer for more speed and the operating
system DIES.  Then they will have to prove to the satisfaction of Microsoft
that they are not a 'pirate', and really beg and kiss ass to get a 
're-authorization'.  This will probably come with a long form and a financial
disclosure statement so that you can happily wallow in spam forever.
The possibilities are endless.  When Microsoft's 'Hailstorm' project is
fully implemented, users will only have one year or even month to
month 'temporary authorizations', kinda like rent.  These consumers will
even be encouraged to use 'application service providers' for their
data and office applications.  That's right, Excel and Access could become
web bots that you rent by the month.....or even by the byte.

By the way, I use S.u.S.E. and there is a program in that distro called
Mupad.  It is from www.sciface.com on the web, and takes about 45
megabytes on the disk.  It might be pretty good.  And I have not seen
anything from Microsoft that StarOffice 5.2 from Sun cannot do and
maybe do better.  Certainly a LOT less nosy than any Bill Gates outfit.
I ain't fergettin how he looked for a wife.  Made them go on 'virtual
dates' and fill out applications to go 'out' with him.....go figure!

By the way again, S.u.S.E. had a top notch file shredder.  On a dual booting
system that knows all about windows, this program is a stone cold killer
of files that windows refuses to delete, like the _Restore secret directories
on WinME and Win2000 and XP systems that hold info on every web
page you have seen and every file you have accessed...when....and how
long for government surveillance and private commercial purposes.

Standing Bear
rockcast net-link.net

  running S.u.S.E.  7.2 on an Athlon 1.4 gHz, 512MB white box triple 
booting win98 (games), S.u.S.E., and winNT 4.0 (toy).  Suse runs on
its own hard drive and the windows environments don't know it is even
there.   

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Wed Nov 28 19:50:06 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id TAA21259;
	Wed, 28 Nov 2001 19:49:21 -0800
Resent-Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 19:49:21 -0800
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Standing Bear <rockcast net-link.net>
To: vortex-l eskimo.com, Stephen Lajoie <lajoie@eskimo.com>
Subject: Re: A question of integrity
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 22:51:13 -0500
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2]
References: <Pine.SUN.3.96.1011126130557.12450A-100000 eskimo.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.96.1011126130557.12450A-100000 eskimo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <01112822511302.00971 tyrannosaur>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Resent-Message-ID: <"VL5q32.0.5C5.11R1y" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45426
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: RO
X-Status: 

On Monday 26 November 2001 16:07, Stephen Lajoie wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Nov 2001, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> > Stephen Lajoie wrote:
> > >The Michelson Morely experiment has been repeated many times. The whole
> > >point of the experiment is that it can detect such differences. Yes, it
> > > is noticeable.
> >
> > I expect the M&M results were correct, and special relativity has been
> > confirmed by several other methods, but in point of fact this experiment
> > was NOT repeated many times. It was repeated only once, as far as I know,
> > by Dayton Miller in the early 1920s, who used a much better apparatus.
> > His
>
> http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/RelWWW/tests.html
>
> Also, I believe you will find that many of the laser gyro's wouldn't work
> if the speed of light was not constant.
>
> > experiment won the 1925 AAAS national prize in physics. It contradicted
> > M&M's result. Miller observed clear evidence that there is a difference
> > in the speed of light from different stars, in a good fit with the aether
> > wind hypothesis. Einstein and others agreed this was a good experiment.
> > However, special relativity became popular, and very useful as a tool.
> > Other evidence for the theory accumulated. Gradually, the Miller research
> > was forgotten. In 1955 a team re-analyzed Miller's results and came to
> > the tentative conclusion that his apparatus was affected by temperature.
>
> Yes. So why even bring it up?
>
> > This is described in H. Collins, T. Pinch, "The Golem," p. 39 - 43. If
> > this account is correct, I would say this aspect of the theory remains
> > unsettled.
> >
> > - Jed

The speed of light is like the speed of sound, changes in every medium
it is found in.  We have even slowed it down so much that an old
Volkswagen could pass it.  What's a vacuum anyway.  Certainly not 
space.  Lots of stuff in space!  Particles, gases, rocks, rogue planets
and stars....not a complete vacuum really anywhere.  Scientists before
the Zweien Weltenkreigen thought that the speed of sound would 
never be exceeded either.   They figured that such a craft foolhardy
enough to attempt it would shake apart.  They were wrong then, and
GR religious quacks who substitute blind faith as a cover for a lack
of intelligence will be proved wrong here as well.  Already the
government knows better in their really serious projects.  Bought one
of Einstein's old books published in the 20's.  It had more terms in
the energy equations than I saw when I studied engineering at
university.  Maybe he should be checked up on.  Energy equations
are based ultimately on force equations anyway, and the force
equations that we have been using do not take into account
impact forces.  They are incomplete without including derivative
terms describing onsets of acceleration, time varying in three or
more dimensions and higher derivatives.

Standing Bear
rockcast net-link.net

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Thu Nov 29 01:52:47 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id BAA28471;
	Thu, 29 Nov 2001 01:50:04 -0800
Resent-Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 01:50:04 -0800
Message-ID: <007a01c178bb$4e88f320$c78f209a ggrf30j>
From: "Nick Palmer" <nick7 itl.net>
To: <vortex-l eskimo.com>
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20011127155222.04040750 pop.mindspring.com> <3.0.3.32.20011127153014.006a4bd4@alcor.concordia.ca> <5.1.0.14.2.20011128094745.033fbe48@pop.mindspring.com>
Subject: Re: book covers and more
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 09:50:00 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Resent-Message-ID: <"dfUQE1.0.my6.CJW1y" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45427
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

Jed wrote:

<<Except that the other side actually is evil and irrational.>>

<< To preserve their money and power, they trample academic
freedom. They ridicule, harass and fire researchers for publishing data and
speaking at conferences, and deliberately keep themselves and the public in
ignorance.>>

This doesn't fit with my notion of true evil. Evil would be if the DOE,
Parks etc had seen the data, recognised that there was a real phenomenon
that would be of benefit to the majority of human kind, and then suppressed
and vilified it to "preserve their money and power". Turning a blind eye and
scoffing is evidence of bad behaviour, greed or stupidity or all three. To
be evil requires conscious knowledge that the truth one is trying to clamp
down on would be beneficial. Ignorance and refusal to look is something
else.
    Having said all that, I believe that far more damage is done by
bad/stupid/ignorant/arrogant people (as is the case in CF scepticism) than
is ever done by truly evil people.

Nick Palmer

P.S. My apologies for posting the NY times article on TEG's after Eugene had
already posted it.  I hadn't seen all my email before I sent it.


From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Thu Nov 29 06:54:42 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id GAA02534;
	Thu, 29 Nov 2001 06:52:10 -0800
Resent-Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 06:52:10 -0800
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20011129094848.034691f8 pop.mindspring.com>
X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 09:52:09 -0500
To: vortex-l eskimo.com, vortex-l@eskimo.com
From: Jed Rothwell <jedrothwell infinite-energy.com>
Subject: Re: clarification... on anomalousness
In-Reply-To: <jk3b0us8i8n8jthgh4t3opn7ann34d70c3 4ax.com>
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20011128130824.03476008 pop.mindspring.com>
 <a05100300b82a34973f0c [4.46.76.120]>
 <3.0.3.32.20011127153014.006a4bd4 alcor.concordia.ca>
 <3.0.3.32.20011127153014.006a4bd4 alcor.concordia.ca>
 <3.0.3.32.20011128125423.007e88b0 alcor.concordia.ca>
 <5.1.0.14.2.20011128130824.03476008 pop.mindspring.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Resent-Message-ID: <"SBEMP.0.Rd.Pka1y" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45428
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: RO
X-Status: A

Robin van Spaandonk wrote:

> >input power has not changed, and cannot cause the event anyway. (The power
> >supplies will not go that high.) Still, any sane person would see it,
> >realize what it means, and run for the door, which is what Celani did.
>[snip]
>Hi Jed,
>
>Where is this written up?

It just happened a few weeks before the JCF-3 conference (October 25). 
Celani described the event during his presentation. I hope he writes it up 
soon. He had good SEM photos of the melting and other damage to the 
cathode. The cell was not equipped for calorimetry, so he can only estimate 
how hot got, and how long the intense heat continued. It probably lasted 
about hour with the peak output for about 5 minutes.

- Jed

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Thu Nov 29 08:08:53 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id IAA15975;
	Thu, 29 Nov 2001 08:05:53 -0800
Resent-Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 08:05:53 -0800
X-Authentication-Warning: eskimo.com: billb owned process doing -bs
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 08:05:49 -0800 (PST)
From: William Beaty <billb eskimo.com>
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: tokamak
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20011129094848.034691f8 pop.mindspring.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.96.1011129080029.2455E-100000 eskimo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Resent-Message-ID: <"8Q7pS3.0.Pv3.Xpb1y" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45429
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: RO
X-Status: 


Hey, I just noticed that the UW in Seattle has an opening for a fun job as
a lab tech.   It's a fusion research project, w/tokamak and everything. 
Maybe I'll end up getting a paycheck from the hot fusion research
establishment!    :) 

http://www.aa.washington.edu/AERP/HIT/hit.html
http://www.aa.washington.edu/AERP/HIT/


((((((((((((((((((((( ( (  (   (    (O)    )   )  ) ) )))))))))))))))))))))
William J. Beaty                                  SCIENCE HOBBYIST website
billb eskimo.com                                  http://www.amasci.com
EE/programmer/sci-exhibits          science projects, tesla, weird science
Seattle, WA   206-789-0775          freenrg-L taoshum-L vortex-L webhead-L

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Thu Nov 29 08:33:54 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id IAA02387;
	Thu, 29 Nov 2001 08:30:59 -0800
Resent-Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 08:30:59 -0800
X-Authentication-Warning: eskimo.com: lajoie owned process doing -bs
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 08:30:50 -0800 (PST)
From: Stephen Lajoie <lajoie eskimo.com>
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Best Linux
In-Reply-To: <01112822383101.00971 tyrannosaur>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.96.1011129082857.6207A-100000 eskimo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Resent-Message-ID: <"3c57V1.0.la.1Bc1y" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45430
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

On Wed, 28 Nov 2001, Standing Bear wrote:


I've installed an old Red Hat 6.2 from Cheapbytes.com.

So, you recommend S.u.S.E.? What is the advantage?

[snip tale of future Microsoft Horrors]

> By the way, I use S.u.S.E. and there is a program in that distro called
> Mupad.  It is from www.sciface.com on the web, and takes about 45
> megabytes on the disk.  It might be pretty good.  And I have not seen
> anything from Microsoft that StarOffice 5.2 from Sun cannot do and
> maybe do better.  Certainly a LOT less nosy than any Bill Gates outfit.
> I ain't fergettin how he looked for a wife.  Made them go on 'virtual
> dates' and fill out applications to go 'out' with him.....go figure!
> 
> By the way again, S.u.S.E. had a top notch file shredder.  On a dual booting
> system that knows all about windows, this program is a stone cold killer
> of files that windows refuses to delete, like the _Restore secret directories
> on WinME and Win2000 and XP systems that hold info on every web
> page you have seen and every file you have accessed...when....and how
> long for government surveillance and private commercial purposes.
> 
> Standing Bear
> rockcast net-link.net
> 
>   running S.u.S.E.  7.2 on an Athlon 1.4 gHz, 512MB white box triple 
> booting win98 (games), S.u.S.E., and winNT 4.0 (toy).  Suse runs on
> its own hard drive and the windows environments don't know it is even
> there.   
> 
> 

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Thu Nov 29 10:31:01 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id KAA02179;
	Thu, 29 Nov 2001 10:27:47 -0800
Resent-Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 10:27:47 -0800
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20011129131635.00aba488 pop.mindspring.com>
X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 13:27:04 -0500
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
From: Jed Rothwell <jedrothwell infinite-energy.com>
Subject: Re: Best Linux
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.96.1011129082857.6207A-100000 eskimo.com>
References: <01112822383101.00971 tyrannosaur>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Resent-Message-ID: <"y1BGd3.0.yX.Zud1y" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45431
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

Alternative operating systems like Linux or the Macintosh OS do not run the 
programs I need, such as voice input and a word processor that supports 
Japanese characters.

I do not know the details, but I doubt these alternative systems are really 
more bullet-proof against hackers than Windows. The reason Windows is 
attacked so often is the same reason it supports so many different 
programs: because it is so popular. If 90% of the computers in the world 
ran Linux instead, the hackers would concentrate on Linux and they would 
soon find ways to put worms into it. I have read that much of the weakness 
is in the Internet structure, which was designed to share information 
between open, trusting universities.

The parallels between computer viruses and biology are uncanny. Windows is 
vulnerable to computer viruses for the same reason popular hybrid corn 
varieties are vulnerable to bacteria, fungus and so on. Computers and 
agriculture need more biodiversity to remain healthy and limit the spread 
of disease, but biodiversity is uneconomical to programmers and farmers. 
Everyone wants the optimum solution; no one wants to sacrifice his own 
profit to improve the health of the system as a whole.

- Jed

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Thu Nov 29 12:12:09 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id MAA23924;
	Thu, 29 Nov 2001 12:09:24 -0800
Resent-Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 12:09:24 -0800
Message-ID: <00a201c17911$8ed4cc00$31fbc2d4 oemcomputer>
Reply-To: "Jean-Pierre Lentin" <jplentin club-internet.fr>
From: "Jean-Pierre Lentin" <jplentin club-internet.fr>
To: <vortex-l eskimo.com>
References: <3.0.1.32.20010729131751.0180955c pop3.club-internet.fr> <000201c16b5e$9c0118e0$cea8f1c3@p7l2i4>
Subject: Re: Jean-Pierre Vigier & cold fusion (pt 1)
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 21:07:25 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
Resent-Message-ID: <"aX8Yo1.0.br5.qNf1y" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45432
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

Hi Peter, Jean DLG, Jed, Bart, Robin, Stephen, Nick & all !

> 29 July 2001 you send a message to the vortex group
> that you interviewed J.P Vigier and that the article probably
> would be online  www.sciences-et-avenir.com.
> Please let me know where the article was published.
> Peter van Noorden

The article was delayed for a while. Then finally it was on again and we
just finished the lay-out/PAO part. It will definitely be on the newstands
around December 25th (what a gift !). Now, I'm not sure about the on-line
version, since Sciences & Avenir doesn't put all its concent for free on the
web immediately, for obvious reasons. Normally they select one or two
articles, and put the other ones in the archives a few months later.

I wish I could say more on Zvonko Maric's Vigier-inspired experiment
(lithium 7 in capillaries, proton beam (plasma focus), intense magnetic
field, and bingo - creation of helium and 1000° C excess heat, allegedly on
a perfectly reproducible basis). I talked briefly to Maric on the phone,
asking why the hell he had a special lab built in some sort of cave. He said
it is for preventing interference with cosmic rays. He sent me 2 pictures of
the set-up, which I meant to post for the list, unfortunately they
disappeared in a HD crash. I asked him to send them again but so far we
received nothing, so the article will appear without pictures of the
set-up - but we commissioned a photographer for a beautiful pic of Vigier...
Anyway, the pictures seemed rather meaningless to me. The whole thingamajig
looks like a big array of colourful spaghettis, and the plasma focus, with
its cover on, looks like a big old pressure cooker. I know Maric has some
schematics too. If someone is seriously interest I suggest to ask Maric
directly
maric phy.bg.ac.yu
or his assistant Dusan Jovanovic, I think he's the one who sent the pictures
djovanov phy.bg.ac.yu
They have a web site at Belgrad's Institute of Physics, but so far I didn't
see anything on the experiment.
www.phy.bg.ac.yu/main.html

Back to my article, it's part of 12 pages special on "Heretics of science".
I wrote all of it. The other heretics are Jacques Benveniste, Halton Arp,
Hannes Alvén and the "electric universe" crowd, Fred Hoyle (R.I.P.) and -
boooo ! - Peter Duesberg (I thoroughly disagree with Duesberg's view on AIDS
but as heretics go he had his place here).

BTW -  As a science writer specializing in "hereticology", I strongly
support Bart Simon's point of view about science as an eminently social
construct. Cold fusion is heresy right now, and will eventually become
mainstream, not only through good experimental work, but also through many
other factors, economic, social, political, cultural, philosophical,
mediatic, personal, and so on. Thousands of books and essays brilliantly
support this view, from Bachelard and Koyre to Kuhn, Feyerabend, Pinch,
Stengers, Latour, etc... Ironically, Jed doesn't seem to realize he's saying
exactly that ! If cold fusion has been clearly and unequivocally
demonstrated in the laboratory (and I'm sure it is), then the non-acceptance
is definitely extra-scientific... (ooops ! now I goota run for cover :-)

But, of course, as Vigier also told quite a few times in this interview,
nature is the sole and final judge.

PS - I will post soon a "part 2" from Vigier's interview

Cheers to all


From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Thu Nov 29 12:34:29 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id MAA08609;
	Thu, 29 Nov 2001 12:31:32 -0800
Resent-Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 12:31:32 -0800
Message-ID: <3C069AC1.BC1CEA1B verisoft.com.tr>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 22:29:53 +0200
From: hamdi ucar <hamdix verisoft.com.tr>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: en-US
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: vortexb <vortex-l eskimo.com>
Subject: Future of computing with MS
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Resent-Message-ID: <"9WZof2.0.R62.aif1y" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45433
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

Hi All,

I think I have an idea on Microsoft what is doing and its purpose. In this post I also exposed an effective and stealthy anti-competitive practice technique of MS.

Go back to before PC era. There were only mainframes. Suppose a computer company give services to anybody to use mainframe for personal usage for all purpose, with little fee or almost free, but with one condition, What ever the user write on that compute
r, all intellectual property would be belong not to the user but to the company. (It would be a bright idea to give away paper made calendar planner to people, and write a small notice inside, stating anything be written on this planner will become proper
ty of planner supplier company. I am wondering the law system of U.S. allows such a thing? But the below MS legal notice imply that is possible)

How this model can be used on PC? Is it impossible while user is owner of hardware and software, while it has full rights on operating the computer? No, it is possible unfortunately. There are many ways.

In principle, the software controls the computer and the data, not the user. But why a user load a program into his computer restricting its rights, following policies on interest of the software company and of third parties instead of him? Wouldn't user 
stop using such a misbehaving software and purge it from his computer? Probably no. Because:
(skip these reasons going too long)

- User dont care about misbehaviors at all. As long the software is useful, rest is not important. In real world nobody is perfect, nobody is innocent. One can use a pirated copy of software, etc., so if the software misbehavior is tolerable in some exten
d.

- User is not aware of his abuse by the software. Either a software doing nasty things in secrecy, or convince user that it does is not bad or in benefit of the user.

- User knows about misbehaviors, but also know he have no other option, the software he would use next could be worse.

- User cannot get rid of the software because software does not uninstall itself completely. It may had changed operating system settings and added its own settings, there is no method to restore it. A common practice of misbehaving software is changing s
ettings of others programs, adding menu items, shortcuts to specific web pages, so user forced to visit or exchange data with these sites without user notification and authorization. This works even after the software is "uninstalled".

- User cannot get rid of the software because operating system hijacking. The software had altered the operating system so it is not removable. Actually the software is not designed to be unistalled. Please note that reinstalling the Windows does not help
, because reinstalling Windows does not clean up extra dlls and drivers, and extra registry settings implanted by the applications.

- User cannot get rid of the software because data hijacking. The program stored user data in propriety format, in obscure way, no export method is provided. User data will become unusable without this specific software. 


If one examine the Windows operating system, he could see it was crafted very ingenuously for this purpose. Main design rules of operating system are violated by Windows. These are layers to separate operating system from applications, separating operatin
g system configuration from application programs, separating data from programs. These layers are removed in Windows. MS mix virtually inseparably everything in one soup.

By default settings, it force user to store user data in deep operating system directories, it store some operating system configurations on directories apparently dedicated to applications and user data, rendering the the directory structure untouchable.
 This is hijacking. It use unnecessary complications and obscurifications to prevent user configure its computer, Instead, it encourage to applications, (its own and third parties) modify computer configuration without user permission and notification. On
ce a program alter the computer, user have no chance to know it, and not able to restore computer to initial state. (Windows ME said to have such a feature, to restore computer to a past state, but in expense of lost of user data generated in that period)
. 

An other effective way to restrict user rights and control on programs is providing them as services, specially as installable or online services. Actually, end user licensee agreement (EULA) of one of these online services claim rights on user data, for 
example MS online services passport license agreement dated March 31,2001, http://www.passport.com/Consumer/TermsOfUse.asp (but revised August 1, 2001)

states:

"LICENSE TO MICROSOFT

By posting messages, uploading files, inputting data, submitting any feedback or suggestions, or engaging in any other form of communication with or through the Passport Web Site, you warrant and represent that you own or otherwise control the rights nece
ssary to do so and you are granting Microsoft and its affiliated companies permission to:


Use, modify, copy, distribute, transmit, publicly display, publicly perform, reproduce, publish, sublicense, create derivative works from, transfer, or sell any such communication. 
Sublicense to third parties the unrestricted right to exercise any of the foregoing rights granted with respect to the communication. 
Publish your name in connection with any such communication. 
The foregoing grants shall include the right to exploit any proprietary rights in such communication, including but not limited to rights under copyright, trademark, service mark or patent laws under any relevant jurisdiction. No compensation will be paid
 with respect to Microsoft's use of the materials contained within such communication. Microsoft is under no obligation to post or use any materials you may provide and may remove such materials at any time in Microsoft's sole discretion."

This page is rewritten at  Aug. 1,2001 probably after it is "discovered", and no longer include these sentences.

Microsoft pushing technologies to develop online services, not only to provide, distribute and share data, but for handling private data and intellectual property of user. Online services allowed to full control of user computer by service providers, incl
uding to collect data from user, install advertisements channels, actually anything they wants. User would not have any control on his computer rather than the on/off switch partly. 

These online services would be typically licenses by monthly fee basis like ISP's

Many PC users would initially enjoyed by online services which configure their computer automatically and reduce initial software costs. But these services by taking full control of the computer will expose the user to specific channels for advertisements
, for shopping and in all over activities where money taking account. In the early times of internet, America Online Company giving email and other online services, by default does not connect user to internet but connect it to its own network which popul
ated by its affiliated companies and pretend as Internet. Connecting to real network was very cumbersome, and AOL internet connection was so slow, loading a page of few KB in size took minutes. So, user without having other experience of internet think th
is "other part" of the Internet was a damn thing. Even a user success to access to internet by AOL browser, browser simply not supporting required HTML standard would fail to display normal web pages, but only able to display pages designed for AOL browse
r, which are on AOL internal network. This example show how the abuse of user will go. The experience that I described above actually contributed the death of Dr. Ihsan Fahri, our very close friend who lived part time in Florida and Istanbul. She wrote a 
scientific book and tried to publish it. Unfortunately, she was using AOL services. She was not able access resources on internet and correspond with her colleagues via AOL software and service, causing lot of problems and stress. She died in stress crisi
s while talking in phone with the publisher who did everything wrong. 

As I said above, taking over a computer by online service provider is not limited to remove the privacy of user expose them to specific channels, to expose to advertisements and propaganda, but also force them to do things they wants. As we are mostly dep
endent to computers in our daily life, this dependency will be used by companies to enclave us.

BTW, most effective anticompetitive practice MS is doing against independent software developers like me comes naturally. MS write the operating system and also programs. Naturally every  software comes with lot of bugs. MS test bugs of operating system w
ith own applications.
They clear bugs surfaced by running their programs. Eventually, lot of hidden bugs remains. When other parties program runs, these bugs appears, but MS never fix these bugs. So other parties fell into trouble, their costs increases, developing times incre
ase, and they can not compete with MS
applications. Even, many times MS dont fix bugs belong operating systems directly which appears with their own applications, but include fixes bundled with its applications which are affected. These patches fix bugs of operating system dynamically or by o
ther means, so the fixes are only effective while the application is running, or exclusive to MS application, so it would not help other parties. 

When the issue is security, that are bugs causing security problems, users are directly affected by these bugs. But MS again dont care about it, actually dont care anything beside its profit and extending its kingdom. It dont afraid to lose customers, bec
ause it have other anticompetitive methods to increase their marketing share. Now it try to suppress full disclosure of security bugs, by force of money and with demonizing independent security experts who find security holes and publish them with a delay
 after noticing the company of the vulnerable software. This allow the sw company prepare a patch prior bug is published. Probably MS will not satisfy with these measures, but will try to make illegal to publish bugs without permission. A law similar to D
MCA.

Regards,

hamdi ucar

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Thu Nov 29 12:40:00 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id MAA15343;
	Thu, 29 Nov 2001 12:39:20 -0800
Resent-Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 12:39:20 -0800
Message-ID: <3C069CA2.9BCE8AAD verisoft.com.tr>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 22:37:54 +0200
From: hamdi ucar <hamdix verisoft.com.tr>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: en-US
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Re: Latest email virus plague: badtransB
References: <Pine.SUN.3.96.1011125174034.8856A-100000 eskimo.com> <5.1.0.14.2.20011126204008.0302b0d8@pop3.wp.pl> <01112822383101.00971@tyrannosaur>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Resent-Message-ID: <"NWW-22.0.Zl3.tpf1y" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45434
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

Hi,

I wrote a lengthy post on vortexb on ms stuff. 


Standing Bear wrote:
[snip]
> The possibilities are endless.  When Microsoft's 'Hailstorm' project is
> fully implemented, users will only have one year or even month to
> month 'temporary authorizations', kinda like rent.  These consumers will
> even be encouraged to use 'application service providers' for their
> data and office applications.  That's right, Excel and Access could become
> web bots that you rent by the month.....or even by the byte.
> 
[snip]

I tried to expain this tendance by removing user controls and rights on personal computer strategy.

Regards, hamdi

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Thu Nov 29 12:58:47 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id MAA26544;
	Thu, 29 Nov 2001 12:56:05 -0800
Resent-Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 12:56:05 -0800
Message-ID: <3C06A08B.E55336EB verisoft.com.tr>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 22:54:35 +0200
From: hamdi ucar <hamdix verisoft.com.tr>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: en-US
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Re: Future of computing with MS
References: <3C069AC1.BC1CEA1B verisoft.com.tr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Resent-Message-ID: <"puirr3.0.gU6.b3g1y" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45435
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

Sorry, it was for vortexb, as you see from "To:" line :(, but posted here due to my mail client silliness.

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Thu Nov 29 15:59:44 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id PAA21085;
	Thu, 29 Nov 2001 15:56:52 -0800
Resent-Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 15:56:52 -0800
Message-ID: <000a01c17931$65735460$2de533d0 usadatanet.net>
From: "Ryan Hopkins" <thebishop usadatanet.net>
To: <vortex-l eskimo.com>
References: <Pine.SUN.3.96.1011129080029.2455E-100000 eskimo.com>
Subject: Re: tokamak
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 18:55:55 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
Resent-Message-ID: <"Ra-g52.0.D95.3ji1y" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45436
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: RO
X-Status: 

that is the coolest thing I've seen today. Have you heard back from them
yet?
Ryan

----- Original Message -----
From: "William Beaty" <billb eskimo.com>
To: <vortex-l eskimo.com>
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 11:05 AM
Subject: tokamak


>
> Hey, I just noticed that the UW in Seattle has an opening for a fun job as
> a lab tech.   It's a fusion research project, w/tokamak and everything.
> Maybe I'll end up getting a paycheck from the hot fusion research
> establishment!    :)
>
> http://www.aa.washington.edu/AERP/HIT/hit.html
> http://www.aa.washington.edu/AERP/HIT/
>
>
>
((((((((((((((((((((( ( (  (   (    (O)    )   )  ) ) )))))))))))))))))))))
> William J. Beaty                                  SCIENCE HOBBYIST website
> billb eskimo.com                                  http://www.amasci.com
> EE/programmer/sci-exhibits          science projects, tesla, weird science
> Seattle, WA   206-789-0775          freenrg-L taoshum-L vortex-L webhead-L
>

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Thu Nov 29 16:02:18 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id PAA22649;
	Thu, 29 Nov 2001 15:58:51 -0800
Resent-Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 15:58:51 -0800
Sender: hoyt eskimo.com
Message-ID: <3C06AF62.243287C8 home.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 14:57:54 -0700
From: "Hoyt Stearns Jr." <hoyt-stearns home.com>
Organization: ISUS
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.0-4GB i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "vortex-l eskimo.com" <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Subject: Linux & viruses
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Resent-Message-ID: <"DVA_b.0.oX5.xki1y" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45437
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: RO
X-Status: 

Jed Rothwell wrote:

> 
> ...I do not know the details, but I doubt these alternative systems are really
> more bullet-proof against hackers than Windows. The reason Windows is
> attacked so often is the same reason it supports so many different
> programs: because it is so popular. If 90% of the computers in the world
> ran Linux instead, the hackers would concentrate on Linux and they would
> soon find ways to put worms into it. I have read that much of the weakness...

I think a reason Linux is more immune is that it is a
UNIX variant, and UNIX runs
at universities such as Berkeley and Stanford to
support thousands of users.

Where better than Berkeley to bullet-proof a computer
environment with all those
genius computer hacker students?  It's been running
long enough to almost guarantee
all holes have been plugged. Furthermore, UNIX comes in
flavors that meet DOD
security standards.  It is inherent in UNIX that unless
you get the ROOT password,
system files are just not accessible at all--it is very
good at protecting itself.

Best Regards,
Hoyt Stearns
Scottsdale, Arizona

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Thu Nov 29 16:29:04 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id QAA08302;
	Thu, 29 Nov 2001 16:26:03 -0800
Resent-Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 16:26:03 -0800
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 19:33:43 -0500 (EST)
From: John Schnurer <herman antioch-college.edu>
To: "Hoyt Stearns Jr." <hoyt-stearns home.com>
cc: "vortex-l eskimo.com" <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Subject: Re: Linux & viruses
In-Reply-To: <3C06AF62.243287C8 home.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1011129191929.12948a-100000 college.antioch-college.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Resent-Message-ID: <"WYd2r3.0.M12.O8j1y" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45438
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: RO
X-Status: 



	Dear Folks,

	The primary reason it seems windows is so vulnerable is because
MACRO VIRUSES are the most prevalent type and any MS Word message or other
transmission which carries a "macro" with it may carry a malware (meaning
bad or not nice-guy code) macro with it.
	A "macro" is a small or not-so-small block of executable code that
is Supposed to make your like easier and is part of the MS Word file ....
a macro may open or close a message or document automatically.... or may
do other stuff I will not list here.

	The other primary avenues of vulnerabilities include but are not
limited to:

	XML
	Active-X
	anything carrying a Macro
	malware of various types


	To learn more you can begin by going to the journal

	
	http://www.infosecuritymag.com/
		
	http://www.icsalabs.com/index.shtml

	Anti-Virus Product Developers Consortium

                                  Welcome to the ICSA Labs Anti-Virus
site, your reliable source for up-to-date information on computer viruses,
worms, and the newest forms of malicious code.  The growth of malicious
programs has steadily increased from annoyance to a major security threat
to all communities of Internet users and businesses. ICSA Labs helps
anti-virus product developers address these threats with our Product
Certification programs and we are a central source of virus alerts, hoax
information, and breaking industry news for thousands of users and
businesses worldwide. 
                  
	 ICSA Labs Virus Alerts
	


				J

	Viruses are mostly misunderstood by the public in general.
	You can begin to educate yourselves, above.


On Thu, 29 Nov 2001, Hoyt Stearns Jr. wrote:

> Jed Rothwell wrote:
> 
> > 
> > ...I do not know the details, but I doubt these alternative systems are really
> > more bullet-proof against hackers than Windows. The reason Windows is
> > attacked so often is the same reason it supports so many different
> > programs: because it is so popular. If 90% of the computers in the world
> > ran Linux instead, the hackers would concentrate on Linux and they would
> > soon find ways to put worms into it. I have read that much of the weakness...
> 
> I think a reason Linux is more immune is that it is a
> UNIX variant, and UNIX runs
> at universities such as Berkeley and Stanford to
> support thousands of users.
> 
> Where better than Berkeley to bullet-proof a computer
> environment with all those
> genius computer hacker students?  It's been running
> long enough to almost guarantee
> all holes have been plugged. Furthermore, UNIX comes in
> flavors that meet DOD
> security standards.  It is inherent in UNIX that unless
> you get the ROOT password,
> system files are just not accessible at all--it is very
> good at protecting itself.
> 
> Best Regards,
> Hoyt Stearns
> Scottsdale, Arizona
> 

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Thu Nov 29 20:04:22 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id TAA15780;
	Thu, 29 Nov 2001 19:59:46 -0800
Resent-Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 19:59:46 -0800
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Standing Bear <rockcast net-link.net>
To: vortex-l eskimo.com, John Schnurer <herman@antioch-college.edu>,
        "Hoyt Stearns Jr." <hoyt-stearns home.com>
Subject: Re: Linux & viruses
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 23:01:09 -0500
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2]
Cc: "vortex-l eskimo.com" <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
References: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1011129191929.12948a-100000 college.antioch-college.edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1011129191929.12948a-100000 college.antioch-college.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <01112923010900.03035 tyrannosaur>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Resent-Message-ID: <"s617D1.0.Qs3.nGm1y" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45439
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: RO
X-Status: 

On Thursday 29 November 2001 19:33, John Schnurer wrote:
> Dear Folks,
>
> 	The primary reason it seems windows is so vulnerable is because
> MACRO VIRUSES are the most prevalent type and any MS Word message or other
> transmission which carries a "macro" with it may carry a malware (meaning
> bad or not nice-guy code) macro with it.
> 	A "macro" is a small or not-so-small block of executable code that
> is Supposed to make your like easier and is part of the MS Word file ....
> a macro may open or close a message or document automatically.... or may
> do other stuff I will not list here.
>
> 	The other primary avenues of vulnerabilities include but are not
> limited to:
>
> 	XML
> 	Active-X
> 	anything carrying a Macro
> 	malware of various types
>
>
> 	To learn more you can begin by going to the journal
>
>
> 	http://www.infosecuritymag.com/
>
> 	http://www.icsalabs.com/index.shtml
>
> 	Anti-Virus Product Developers Consortium
>
>                                   Welcome to the ICSA Labs Anti-Virus
> site, your reliable source for up-to-date information on computer viruses,
> worms, and the newest forms of malicious code.  The growth of malicious
> programs has steadily increased from annoyance to a major security threat
> to all communities of Internet users and businesses. ICSA Labs helps
> anti-virus product developers address these threats with our Product
> Certification programs and we are a central source of virus alerts, hoax
> information, and breaking industry news for thousands of users and
> businesses worldwide.
>
> 	 ICSA Labs Virus Alerts
>
>
>
> 				J
>
> 	Viruses are mostly misunderstood by the public in general.
> 	You can begin to educate yourselves, above.
>
> On Thu, 29 Nov 2001, Hoyt Stearns Jr. wrote:
> > Jed Rothwell wrote:
> > > ...I do not know the details, but I doubt these alternative systems are
> > > really more bullet-proof against hackers than Windows. The reason
> > > Windows is attacked so often is the same reason it supports so many
> > > different programs: because it is so popular. If 90% of the computers
> > > in the world ran Linux instead, the hackers would concentrate on Linux
> > > and they would soon find ways to put worms into it. I have read that
> > > much of the weakness...
> >
> > I think a reason Linux is more immune is that it is a
> > UNIX variant, and UNIX runs
> > at universities such as Berkeley and Stanford to
> > support thousands of users.
> >
> > Where better than Berkeley to bullet-proof a computer
> > environment with all those
> > genius computer hacker students?  It's been running
> > long enough to almost guarantee
> > all holes have been plugged. Furthermore, UNIX comes in
> > flavors that meet DOD
> > security standards.  It is inherent in UNIX that unless
> > you get the ROOT password,
> > system files are just not accessible at all--it is very
> > good at protecting itself.
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Hoyt Stearns
> > Scottsdale, Arizona

Thanks Hoyt
     For setting the record straighter.  I doubt you will convince
him any more than you could get Bin Laden to celebrate
Christmas and put up a tree and light it in the middle
of Kabul in front of Abdul Rashid Dostum's Northern Alliance
fighters.  In my SuSE, today I noticed some packages that
were optimized for Japanese......word processors.  Even
the 'SuseHilfe-pagen are in many languages, and the
interface can be in any language from Catalan to Croatian
to Chinese Big Five!  So much for lack of foreign language
support.  I know that windows supports some languages,
but you have to pay for everything that you get, and what
you get is grudgingly delivered.   I know, my double booting
system has more windows programs than may windows
single booters.  Over 400,000 files spread over over 20
partitions and thousands of directories.  Bought one program,
'Deluxe Universal Translator' that has 40 languages and 
takes over 500 MB on one partition (keep DOS partitions
down to 2GB per partition to keep cluster sizes down, and
try to make at least 2 FAT16 partitions to enable old war
horse DOS hex dump programs to hexadecimal edit questionable
programs.  FAT32 files have ownership attributes that are
undocumented and users are NOT the superuser as in
UNIX.  Microsoft and/or its designees are.  Anyway, that
language program gave me?lots of trouble until I found out
by accident that a large 'discount' house sold me a beta
program that was older than the retail version.....on SALE
no less!?   I wrote the company and they sent me a current
version, so at least I got service out of them.   
Linux, on the other hand, has some of the same stuff...FREE!


Standing Bear
rockcast net-link.net

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Thu Nov 29 20:07:41 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id UAA20461;
	Thu, 29 Nov 2001 20:07:00 -0800
Resent-Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 20:07:00 -0800
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Standing Bear <rockcast net-link.net>
To: vortex-l eskimo.com, Stephen Lajoie <lajoie@eskimo.com>
Subject: Re: Best Linux
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 23:08:40 -0500
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2]
References: <Pine.SUN.3.96.1011129082857.6207A-100000 eskimo.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.96.1011129082857.6207A-100000 eskimo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <01112923084001.03035 tyrannosaur>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Resent-Message-ID: <"6P3C82.0.X_4.ZNm1y" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45440
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

The advantage is that you get 7 CDs and a DVD, all jam packed
with software of just about every description.  This is not
shovel ware sports fans.  It is not an install disk and a half full
data disk with a third disk thrown in with a bunch of 'on line'
books that made it onto that CD because they could not
get themselves sold in stores.  These are completely full of
programs.  Like Fortran-77, C, IBM DB2,  PostGRESL, StarOffice,
Modula-2, C++ compilers, Lisp, Many editors including
TeX and Ghostview that can edit pdf files..........
.....need I say more?

Standing Bear
rockcast net-link.net











On Thursday 29 November 2001 11:30, Stephen Lajoie wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Nov 2001, Standing Bear wrote:
>
>
> I've installed an old Red Hat 6.2 from Cheapbytes.com.
>
> So, you recommend S.u.S.E.? What is the advantage?
>
> [snip tale of future Microsoft Horrors]
>
> > By the way, I use S.u.S.E. and there is a program in that distro called
> > Mupad.  It is from www.sciface.com on the web, and takes about 45
> > megabytes on the disk.  It might be pretty good.  And I have not seen
> > anything from Microsoft that StarOffice 5.2 from Sun cannot do and
> > maybe do better.  Certainly a LOT less nosy than any Bill Gates outfit.
> > I ain't fergettin how he looked for a wife.  Made them go on 'virtual
> > dates' and fill out applications to go 'out' with him.....go figure!
> >
> > By the way again, S.u.S.E. had a top notch file shredder.  On a dual
> > booting system that knows all about windows, this program is a stone cold
> > killer of files that windows refuses to delete, like the _Restore secret
> > directories on WinME and Win2000 and XP systems that hold info on every
> > web
> > page you have seen and every file you have accessed...when....and how
> > long for government surveillance and private commercial purposes.
> >
> > Standing Bear
> > rockcast net-link.net
> >
> >   running S.u.S.E.  7.2 on an Athlon 1.4 gHz, 512MB white box triple
> > booting win98 (games), S.u.S.E., and winNT 4.0 (toy).  Suse runs on
> > its own hard drive and the windows environments don't know it is even
> > there.

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Fri Nov 30 03:09:59 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id DAA23402;
	Fri, 30 Nov 2001 03:07:24 -0800
Resent-Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 03:07:24 -0800
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <a0510030ab82d04565510 [209.23.136.27]>
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20011128115051.00aba4c8 pop.mindspring.com>
References: <4.3.2.7.1.20011128103525.00b75878 world.std.com>
 <3.0.3.32.20011128091641.007d05d0 alcor.concordia.ca>
 <5.1.0.14.2.20011127155222.04040750 pop.mindspring.com>
 <3.0.3.32.20011127153014.006a4bd4 alcor.concordia.ca>
 <5.1.0.14.2.20011128115051.00aba4c8 pop.mindspring.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 05:07:23 -0600
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
From: thomas malloy <temalloy metro.lakes.com>
Subject: Re: book covers and more
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
Resent-Message-ID: <"JtMku2.0.aj5.iXs1y" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45441
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

>Bart Simon wrote:
>
>>More important are the editors and reviewers (and regular front 
>>line scientists) who unfairly reject CF articles by Ed and others 
>>but I think there is more to this than corruption and conspiracy 
>>(although I am convinced there is definately some conspiracy 
>>involved)...
>
>It is mainly intellectual laziness. They do not bother to read the 
>papers. Their comments in the rejection letters reveal they do not 
>read the papers and know nothing about them.

Come on Jed, you know better than that, they are defending their pet 
paradigm! They don't give a damn about the evidence, their minds are 
made up.

>
>>The skeptically minded normal scientists are in part able to dismiss
>>current CF claims because as a consequence of history (1989-90) they
>>believe the work of CF researchers is a priori wrong so that in the same
>>way that scientists tend to throw creation science papers in the trash . . .
>
>There is a gigantic difference between a biologist who rejects 
>creationism and a "normal minded scientist" who dismisses CF! The 
>biologist knows his field in detail, and he can give you reasons for 
>his beliefs. The "normal minded scientist" is not acting as a 
>scientist at all. He knows nothing about the CF data -- he does not 
>even realize that it exists. You cannot judge data you have never 
>heard of.

I disagree, the biologists who believe in spontanious biogenesis are 
viewing life as a physical phenomena, and it's not. Life is an energy 
based phenomena. A belief in the spontaneous genesis of life is like 
believing that a tornado blew through a scrap yard and a 747 flew 
out. Those biologists are defending their paradigm just like Parks 
does. Parksie knows all about how his paradign works too.


>
>
>>I don't even get the sense that regular run of the mill scientists 
>>give CF a second thought let alone conspire to keep CF research 
>>down.
>
>No, they do not. A few powerful people censor the information and 
>keep the run of the mill scientists in the dark.


Any working physical scientist who hasn't spent some time 
investigating LENR's is brain dead!

>
>>For my money CF has proven to be a rather highly successful case of 
>>marginalized science (considering all the claims out there we could 
>>choose from) comparable perhaps to parapsychology (which survives 
>>not too badly through its own set of institutions) but also to the 
>>theory of continental drift which managed to hang in there despite 
>>years of "ignoring the data."
>
>The data for parapsychology is very close to the noise. (It may be 
>in the noise, for all I know.) It has to be mathematically massaged,

Wrong! have you ever heard of the time that one of Hal Puthoff's 
remove viewers at SRI found a MIG 22 that someone had parked in the 
Limpopo River?

>  like the Top Quark data. Some of the data for CF is miles above the 
>noise, and some is macroscopic, dramatic, and undeniable, like 
>Mizuno's heat after death. Parapsychology is supposedly difficult to 
>reproduce, whereas some CF experiments, performed repeatedly by 
>world-class organizations such as Mitsubishi, Los Alamos, the NRL 
>and the ENEA, are 100% reproducible. The two fields are vastly 
>different. CF has far more credibility.

You didn't mention anomolous isotopic ratios.

>- Jed

This seems like a good place to ask Bart a question about relativism. 
Now moral relativism I understand. It leads to situational ethics, 
which leads to  impaired moral decisions. I listen to right wing 
patriot talk radio, one example of which is www.am1280thepatriot.com 
. One communicator is Dennis Prager who was discussing the difference 
between America and Europe. One thing that you have to understand is 
that there is no connection between artistic beauty and morality. 
That is why Europe, which has produced such great artists and 
philosophers, is such a moral cesspool.

I have previously posted my fire analogy on this forum, LENR's 
produce so little energy that the only way to measure it is to use a 
bomb calorimeter. OTOH, if you had never seen a wood fire, and I were 
to demonstrate a fire to you, when I got the fire going, to the point 
were the tongue of flame was 6" high, there would be no question in 
your mind that I had demonstrated a new, and useful form of energy.

I don't understand how this applies to science however. Maybe I just 
think in black and white. As I see it, this is a classic paradigm 
revolution, I pray that you will have the courage to point this out 
in your book.



-- 

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Fri Nov 30 03:12:24 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id DAA24678;
	Fri, 30 Nov 2001 03:10:09 -0800
Resent-Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 03:10:09 -0800
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <a05100305b82cf6310224 [209.23.136.27]>
In-Reply-To: <mk780u4ne4qvp75brsan2f7acf03qdv5sc 4ax.com>
References: <2lk30usvt4lpk1g8t7917o37mtq1es1hul 4ax.com>
 <Pine.SUN.3.96.1011126105105.29753B-100000 eskimo.com>
 <mk780u4ne4qvp75brsan2f7acf03qdv5sc 4ax.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 05:10:25 -0600
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
From: thomas malloy <temalloy metro.lakes.com>
Subject: Re: A question of integrity
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
Resent-Message-ID: <"NsDbH2.0.Q16.Gas1y" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45442
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: RO
X-Status: 

>  Travel through a
>wormhole would be an example of an alternative approach.
>It has also since it was first derived, been generalised beyond its
>scope of applicability.

Michio Kaku, who has been interviewed extensively on Art Bell's show 
likes to go on about worm holes. According to Howard, worm holes have 
a microscopic diameter. Being forced though something that size would 
have a rather disasterous effect on the vehicle and it's occupants.

>IMO kinetic energy is magnetic field energy, which in turn assumes the
>presence of a self-magnetic field.

I like this accessment of kinetic energy

>  It may be possible to create a pure
>electrical wave that has no magnetic component,

IMHO it already exists, the energy that makes life possible.

>and is therefore not
>limited to the speed of light, as no energy need be (is) stored in the
>magnetic field.

exactly, this energy may have a finite speed, ie Plank's upper limit, 
but it is not limited to the speed of light.

>
>>
>>>  when he developed the ST. Since then everyone else
>  >> has jumped on the band wagon, and assumed that absolutely nothing could
>  >
>  >You said it was a house of cards. It appears to be a well thought out and
>>tested theory, with few problems in it's predictions.
>
>I think it is a house of cards, in as much as the epicycle theory was a
>house of cards. It too worked, but was replaced by a simpler model .

What is the epicycle theory?

>I think this is what is in store for the standard model. I think the
>replacement will be an aether theory.
>One clue to this is the Plank mass, which currently has no apparent real
>partner.
>I also think the Higgs boson is a pipe dream. Mass is a measure of
>energy content, through interaction with the vacuum, and not a special
>property of matter that requires a new particle. In fact there is no
>such thing as mass, i.e. it is not an intrinsic property of matter, it
>is an extrinsic property. The relevant intrinsic property is particle
>size (the smaller the particle, the more "massive" it is - at least for
>"simple" particles i.e. not conglomerates).
>(Leptons are simple particles, Baryons are conglomerates).
>[snip]
>
>>
>>>  >We can conclude
>>>  >that everything we know is in some measure wrong. Theories are, however,
>>>  >as good as their predictions, and the predictions of SR and GR are fairly
>>>  >good on the large scale. It is still the best theory.

I think that it is full of holes and needs replacement.

>  >>
>>>  It is still a fairly good theory. There are a couple of others that I
>>>  would give the time day.
>  >

Hout Stearns and I are partial to the Recriprocal model.

>  >?!?
>
>This isn't as contradictory as it appears. The epicycle theory worked
>too, and was fine as far as it went. It was a house of cards (i.e. based
>on weak foundations and doomed to collapse and be replaced)
>nevertheless.

Tell me more about the epicycle theory.

>


--

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Fri Nov 30 09:24:40 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id JAA28049;
	Fri, 30 Nov 2001 09:21:50 -0800
Resent-Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 09:21:50 -0800
Message-ID: <3C07C107.A03BD8D9 bellsouth.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 12:25:27 -0500
From: Terry Blanton <commengr bellsouth.net>
Organization: .
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Ginger to be Revealed Monday
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Resent-Message-ID: <"J3_4L2.0.Bs6.j0y1y" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45443
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: A

http://dailynews.yahoo.com/htx/cn/20011129/tc/more_ginger_details_may_be_coming_1.html

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Fri Nov 30 13:03:47 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id MAA17494;
	Fri, 30 Nov 2001 12:58:13 -0800
Resent-Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 12:58:13 -0800
X-Authentication-Warning: eskimo.com: billb owned process doing -bs
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 12:58:06 -0800 (PST)
From: William Beaty <billb eskimo.com>
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Subject: Cavers and nanos and heresy (oh my!)
In-Reply-To: <3C07C107.A03BD8D9 bellsouth.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.96.1011130123421.7877C-100000 eskimo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Resent-Message-ID: <"22s1U1.0.3H4.aB_1y" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45444
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 


I just found a really cool book in the used bookstore: "Dark Life."  It's
from 1999, and the author is a writer rather than a scientist.  As I was
reading, I kept finding all sorts of interesting viewpoints on cutting-
edge biological heresies.  The main one involves the nanobacteria
controversy.  I'd heard of this, but never realized the implications. 
Nanos are bacteria which are the size of large viruses, which are not
noticed under SEM microscopes (you need a field-emission SEM to get the
resolution), whose effects resemble chemical action rather than life, and
which cannot be sterilized using heat such as an autoclave, and live just 
fine in battery acid.

Note well this last one.  If you can't kill them with normal techniques,
then nearly all "sterile" environments are contaminated, including the
insides of humans  (and hey, the insides of Pons-Fleichman experiments.)

My favorite heresy in the book:  all "rusting" phenomena everywhere are
due to bacteria.

While reading, I kept getting the creeps.  Intuitive feeling that this
stuff is going to be really, really big.

   http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0684841916



((((((((((((((((((((( ( (  (   (    (O)    )   )  ) ) )))))))))))))))))))))
William J. Beaty                                  SCIENCE HOBBYIST website
billb eskimo.com                                  http://www.amasci.com
EE/programmer/sci-exhibits          science projects, tesla, weird science
Seattle, WA   206-789-0775          freenrg-L taoshum-L vortex-L webhead-L

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Fri Nov 30 14:25:32 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx2.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id OAA14090;
	Fri, 30 Nov 2001 14:22:38 -0800 (PST)
Resent-Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 14:22:38 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20011130171634.0279ce70 pop.mindspring.com>
X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 17:22:25 -0500
To: vortex-L eskimo.com
From: Jed Rothwell <jedrothwell infinite-energy.com>
Subject: Lessons from the Enron collapse
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx2.eskimo.com id OAA14013
Resent-Message-ID: <"TUPAF3.0.zR3.cQ02y" mx2>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45445
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: RO
X-Status: 

People who think that giant corporations are all-powerfull, particularly 
Big Oil and Big Energy corporations, should read recent business sections 
from newspapers carefully. Last year, Enron was the seventh largest 
corporation in the U.S. It was one of the most feared, ruthless and 
politically well-connected corporations in the world. Many people believe 
it masterminded the California energy crises, fleecing rate payers and the 
state for billions of dollars. Enron’s CEO is a close personal friend of 
President George W. Bush. Enron executives supposedly huddled with Vice 
President Cheney to write the National Energy Policy. It is said that 
Enron’s special skill was to exploit the confusion in newly deregulated 
utility markets, for electricity, natural gas, water and other utilities. 
It made close friends with high officials in the U.S., Britain and India.

In May 2001, in an article titled “Bush Task Force on Energy Worked in 
Mysterious Ways,” the New York Times reported: “Richard S. Shapiro, senior 
vice president of the Enron Corporation, a major Republican contributor and 
the nation's largest trader of wholesale electricity and natural gas, said 
top executives from his firm spent half an hour with Mr. Cheney, but he 
could not tell how much this may have influenced the final report.”

If any large energy corporation ever held a choke-hold over national energy 
supplies and policy, and was ever in a position to dictate policy for its 
own benefit, it was Enron. Yet despite this power, in the space of six 
months Enron has collapsed in one of the most spectacular failures in 
business history. Its stock value fell from $85 in August to 60 cents 
today. Next week it is expected to file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. The top 
executives of the company made out well. They are accused of arranging 
shady “sweet heart deals” to enrich themselves, which are now being 
investigated by the SEC. They sold hundreds of millions of dollars in their 
own stock before the collapse. Many low level employees who had worked for 
companies acquired by Enron, who are now near retirement, saw their 
nest-eggs of hundreds of thousands of dollars wiped out, and investors have 
lost billions.

The ten largest bankruptcy filings since 1980 include two energy companies: 
Texaco (1987, $35 billion - the largest in history), and Pacific Gas & 
Electric (2001, $22 billion). (Bankrupcydata.com) Enron will probably cause 
~$62 billion in losses, twice the world record.

What does all of this prove? It shows that corporations and other 
establishment organizations are not as powerful as people think. Money, 
political connections, and clout can be erased by market forces, or by an 
enraged public – the people of California, in this case. It shows what will 
happen to the oil companies, the DoE, and OPEC if the public ever realizes 
that cold fusion is real. People think these all-powerful institutions can 
stop innovation, order governments around, dial up a war when it suits 
their purposes, and control the fate of nations. They can! They have done 
all of this, and more. I expect they would be pleased to cause catastrophic 
global warming, and to wipe out millions of species to protect their 
profits. They cut short countless human lives with pollution, and flatten 
mountains to dig up coal. Yet despite their present awesome power, they are 
as vulnerable as soap bubbles in a hurricane. A few thousand words, a major 
headline repeated worldwide, a change in public attitude . . . and they 
will be history.

Source:

www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2001/11/29/MN6626.DTL

. . . and many other news articles.

- Jed

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Fri Nov 30 15:13:06 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id PAA11657;
	Fri, 30 Nov 2001 15:09:45 -0800
Resent-Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 15:09:45 -0800
Message-ID: <000c01c179f4$0cac8ae0$c51fd140 usadatanet.net>
From: "Ryan Hopkins" <thebishop usadatanet.net>
To: <vortex-l eskimo.com>
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20011130171634.0279ce70 pop.mindspring.com>
Subject: Re: Lessons from the Enron collapse
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 18:09:18 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
Resent-Message-ID: <"K9QOD1.0.nr2.t612y" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45446
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

Suddenly, monetary investment in near-obsolete fuel technology is coming
into sharp focus.  Thanks for the info, Jed.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jed Rothwell" <jedrothwell infinite-energy.com>
To: <vortex-L eskimo.com>
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 5:22 PM
Subject: Lessons from the Enron collapse


> People who think that giant corporations are all-powerfull, particularly
> Big Oil and Big Energy corporations, should read recent business sections
> from newspapers carefully. Last year, Enron was the seventh largest
> corporation in the U.S. It was one of the most feared, ruthless and
> politically well-connected corporations in the world. Many people believe
> it masterminded the California energy crises, fleecing rate payers and the
> state for billions of dollars. Enron's CEO is a close personal friend of
> President George W. Bush. Enron executives supposedly huddled with Vice
> President Cheney to write the National Energy Policy. It is said that
> Enron's special skill was to exploit the confusion in newly deregulated
> utility markets, for electricity, natural gas, water and other utilities.
> It made close friends with high officials in the U.S., Britain and India.
>
> In May 2001, in an article titled "Bush Task Force on Energy Worked in
> Mysterious Ways," the New York Times reported: "Richard S. Shapiro, senior
> vice president of the Enron Corporation, a major Republican contributor
and
> the nation's largest trader of wholesale electricity and natural gas, said
> top executives from his firm spent half an hour with Mr. Cheney, but he
> could not tell how much this may have influenced the final report."
>
> If any large energy corporation ever held a choke-hold over national
energy
> supplies and policy, and was ever in a position to dictate policy for its
> own benefit, it was Enron. Yet despite this power, in the space of six
> months Enron has collapsed in one of the most spectacular failures in
> business history. Its stock value fell from $85 in August to 60 cents
> today. Next week it is expected to file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. The top
> executives of the company made out well. They are accused of arranging
> shady "sweet heart deals" to enrich themselves, which are now being
> investigated by the SEC. They sold hundreds of millions of dollars in
their
> own stock before the collapse. Many low level employees who had worked for
> companies acquired by Enron, who are now near retirement, saw their
> nest-eggs of hundreds of thousands of dollars wiped out, and investors
have
> lost billions.
>
> The ten largest bankruptcy filings since 1980 include two energy
companies:
> Texaco (1987, $35 billion - the largest in history), and Pacific Gas &
> Electric (2001, $22 billion). (Bankrupcydata.com) Enron will probably
cause
> ~$62 billion in losses, twice the world record.
>
> What does all of this prove? It shows that corporations and other
> establishment organizations are not as powerful as people think. Money,
> political connections, and clout can be erased by market forces, or by an
> enraged public - the people of California, in this case. It shows what
will
> happen to the oil companies, the DoE, and OPEC if the public ever realizes
> that cold fusion is real. People think these all-powerful institutions can
> stop innovation, order governments around, dial up a war when it suits
> their purposes, and control the fate of nations. They can! They have done
> all of this, and more. I expect they would be pleased to cause
catastrophic
> global warming, and to wipe out millions of species to protect their
> profits. They cut short countless human lives with pollution, and flatten
> mountains to dig up coal. Yet despite their present awesome power, they
are
> as vulnerable as soap bubbles in a hurricane. A few thousand words, a
major
> headline repeated worldwide, a change in public attitude . . . and they
> will be history.
>
> Source:
>
> www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2001/11/29/MN6626.DTL
>
> . . . and many other news articles.
>
> - Jed
>

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Fri Nov 30 15:29:26 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id PAA23874;
	Fri, 30 Nov 2001 15:28:34 -0800
Resent-Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 15:28:34 -0800
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20011130182151.02e5d5c0 pop.mindspring.com>
X-Sender: jedrothwell pop.mindspring.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 18:28:29 -0500
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
From: Jed Rothwell <jedrothwell infinite-energy.com>
Subject: Re: Lessons from the Enron collapse
In-Reply-To: <000c01c179f4$0cac8ae0$c51fd140 usadatanet.net>
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20011130171634.0279ce70 pop.mindspring.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Resent-Message-ID: <"u1ppP2.0.xq5.XO12y" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45447
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

Ryan Hopkins wrote:

>Suddenly, monetary investment in near-obsolete fuel technology is coming 
>into sharp focus.

Yes, that is the core story here. Enron did many things wrong, such as 
investing in fiber optic networks, and it was corrupt in some ways. But 
many large corporations are corrupt, and they all lose money in risky 
ventures from time to time. I think the real cause of the downfall was 
exactly what Hopkins said: Enron was trying to sell obsolete technology. 
The public, especially in California, said no thanks, we would rather cut 
consumption by 10% by conserving with new refrigerators and compact 
fluorescent lights. Bingo, Enron goes down the tubes.

Last year V.P. Cheney said conservation is a "private virtue" that cannot 
affect nation level energy consumption or policy. This year, conservation 
bankrupted the seventh largest company in the U.S. practically overnight.

- Jed

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Fri Nov 30 15:30:35 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id PAA24634;
	Fri, 30 Nov 2001 15:30:00 -0800
Resent-Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 15:30:00 -0800
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.1.20011130182414.00aee880 world.std.com>
X-Sender: mica world.std.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 18:29:25 -0500
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
From: Mitchell Swartz <mica world.std.com>
Subject: Re: Lessons from the Enron collapse
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20011130171634.0279ce70 pop.mindspring.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Resent-Message-ID: <"vdUxD.0.l06.tP12y" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45448
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 


More (earlier) info here:

"Lloyd Bentsen, another Texan, and Clinton's first treasury secretary, was 
already a recipient of Enron's largesse."
http://www.corpwatch.org/trac/feature/india/profiles/enron/enroninfluence.html

"These connections to the Democratic administration have helped Enron 
considerably, says Ken Silverstein, who publishes Counterpunch, a 
fortnightly newsletter here.
     Clinton officials publicly helped Enron win the contract in India as 
well as in Indonesia."
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/fr/581227/posts


At 05:22 PM 11/30/2001 -0500, Jed wrote:
>People who think that giant corporations are all-powerfull, particularly 
>Big Oil and Big Energy corporations, should read recent business sections 
>from newspapers carefully. Last year, Enron was the seventh largest 
>corporation in the U.S. It was one of the most feared, ruthless and 
>politically well-connected corporations in the world. Many people believe 
>it masterminded the California energy crises, fleecing rate payers and the 
>state for billions of dollars. Enron's CEO is a close personal friend of 
>President George W. Bush. Enron executives supposedly huddled with Vice 
>President Cheney to write the National Energy Policy. It is said that 
>Enron's special skill was to exploit the confusion in newly deregulated 
>utility markets, for electricity, natural gas, water and other utilities. 
>It made close friends with high officials in the U.S., Britain and India.
>....
>www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2001/11/29/MN6626.DTL

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Fri Nov 30 15:41:55 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id PAA29818;
	Fri, 30 Nov 2001 15:39:20 -0800
Resent-Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 15:39:20 -0800
From: "R. Wormus" <protech frii.com>
To: vortex-l eskimo.com
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 17:34:48 -0600
Message-ID: <yam8734.2421.138192720 mail.frii.com>
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20011130182151.02e5d5c0 pop.mindspring.com>
X-Mailer: YAM 2.2 [060] AmigaOS E-Mail Client (c) 1995-2000 by Marcel Beck  http://www.yam.ch
Subject: Re: Lessons from the Enron collapse
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id PAA29796
Resent-Message-ID: <"mo2N.0.pH7.dY12y" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45449
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

Jed,
ENRON was mainly a trader in energy contracts and as such had few hard assets. They were basically a middleman trying to make something in between and you say there main expertise was manipulating markets (like any shady broker). There collapse is like a 
run on a bad bank; those holding long term contracts with them lost confidence and bailed. It became an ever accellerating downward spiral. 

There is a lesson for regulators here.
Ron
On 30-Nov-01, Jed Rothwell jedrothwell infinite-energy.com wrote:

JR> Ryan Hopkins wrote:
JR> 
JR>> Suddenly, monetary investment in near-obsolete fuel technology is coming 
JR>> into sharp focus.
JR> 
JR> Yes, that is the core story here. Enron did many things wrong, such as 
JR> investing in fiber optic networks, and it was corrupt in some ways. But 
JR> many large corporations are corrupt, and they all lose money in risky 
JR> ventures from time to time. I think the real cause of the downfall was 
JR> exactly what Hopkins said: Enron was trying to sell obsolete technology. 
JR> The public, especially in California, said no thanks, we would rather cut 
JR> consumption by 10% by conserving with new refrigerators and compact 
JR> fluorescent lights. Bingo, Enron goes down the tubes.
JR> 
JR> Last year V.P. Cheney said conservation is a "private virtue" that cannot 
JR> affect nation level energy consumption or policy. This year, conservation 
JR> bankrupted the seventh largest company in the U.S. practically overnight.
JR> 
JR> - Jed
JR> 

From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Fri Nov 30 16:14:36 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx2.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id QAA21035;
	Fri, 30 Nov 2001 16:11:59 -0800 (PST)
Resent-Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 16:11:59 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <000a01c179fc$a77ea960$c51fd140 usadatanet.net>
From: "Ryan Hopkins" <thebishop usadatanet.net>
To: <vortex-l eskimo.com>
References: <yam8734.2421.138192720 mail.frii.com>
Subject: Re: Lessons from the Enron collapse
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 19:10:56 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
Resent-Message-ID: <"tpocZ1.0.W85.6122y" mx2>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45450
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

Wormus commented:

>It became an ever accellerating downward spiral.

Sounds like a vortex! Lasted about as long as a T2 sized tornado, too.
<chuckle> ahh, the irony....



From vortex-l-request eskimo.com  Fri Nov 30 16:17:05 2001
Received: (from smartlst localhost)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id QAA19876;
	Fri, 30 Nov 2001 16:14:03 -0800
Resent-Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 16:14:03 -0800
Message-ID: <000f01c179fc$cf2c7000$c51fd140 usadatanet.net>
From: "Ryan Hopkins" <thebishop usadatanet.net>
To: <vortex-l eskimo.com>
References: <yam8734.2421.138192720 mail.frii.com>
Subject: Re: Lessons from the Enron collapse
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 19:12:03 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
Resent-Message-ID: <"r-_kq2.0.rr4.4322y" mx1>
Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com
Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com
X-Mailing-List: <vortex-l eskimo.com> archive/latest/45451
X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

My sympathies to the straightlaced workers at such companies but... well...
it's about time some of these buggers got taken down.  Would anyone like to
guess as to when this trend will get around to Microsoft?
Ryan