From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Sep 1 00:49:15 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id AAA06361; Sun, 1 Sep 2002 00:48:12 -0700 Resent-Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 00:48:12 -0700 From: Robin van Spaandonk To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Transition to a CF economy Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2002 17:47:38 +1000 Organization: Improving Message-ID: References: <3D6BEDDB.F6709737 ix.netcom.com> <000201c24d1f$397fd8c0$e51b80d9@pavilion> <3D6A59E4.5F310688@ix.netcom.com> <3D6BEDDB.F6709737@ix.netcom.com> <5.1.0.14.2.20020828104706.02b2b540@mail.DIRECTVInternet.com> In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20020828104706.02b2b540 mail.DIRECTVInternet.com> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.92/32.572 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id AAA06319 Resent-Message-ID: <"fjq6B2.0.EZ1.yOSSz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/47920 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Wed, 28 Aug 2002 11:01:56 -0400: Hi, [snip] >>I don't foresee an instantaneous transition. Not everyone can afford a new >>car overnight, so some gas powered vehicles will remain on the roads for >>some time. > >When one-third of the vehicles no longer consume gasoline, gas stations >will go out of business in droves, making it difficult to maintain the >remaining gasoline vehicles. Gas station profit margins are small. A slight This just means that the profit margin at the pump will increase, as people driving gas powered cars will be forced to pay higher prices for a scarcer (due to distribution restrictions) product. >reduction in consumption in the 1970s forced many out of business. When >two-thirds are CF powered, the remaining gasoline vehicles will quickly be >forced off the road. The same dynamics will force a quick changes to other >fossil fuel based technologies, such as beef production. Why do you think that beef production is specifically fossil fuel powered? (i.e. why no CF powered beef production?) > > >>Gas stations will be scrapped, or converted to other businesses (Burger >>King? ;). >>The employees will find work in the CF industry . . . > >There will be no CF industry. All of the labor now performed by 400,000 >skilled workers in the U.S. will be replaced by the labor of a dozen low >level technicians operating the heavy water extraction machinery. That is only for the fuel. You are forgetting the manufacture and distribution of the devices themselves. [snip] Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ Competition provides the motivation, Cooperation provides the means. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Sep 1 09:36:01 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id JAA06980; Sun, 1 Sep 2002 09:35:16 -0700 Resent-Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 09:35:16 -0700 Message-ID: <002401c251ee$52126a00$624eccd1 asus> From: "Mike Carrell" To: References: <3D6BEDDB.F6709737 ix.netcom.com> <000201c24d1f$397fd8c0$e51b80d9@pavilion> <3D6A59E4.5F310688@ix.netcom.com> <3D6BEDDB.F6709737@ix.netcom.com> <5.1.0.14..2.20020828104706.02b2b540@mail.DIRECTVInternet.com> Subject: Re: Transition to a CF economy Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 12:27:49 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Resent-Message-ID: <"qHJlz1.0.-i1.47aSz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/47921 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Discussions about a CF economy are premature until we know what the true consumables are. We have assumed that it is just deuterium, of which there is an essentially unlimited supply. I have not seen an accounting of the energy necessary to extract heavy water from normal water. There is reason to believe that the successful devices will be gas phase, so the energy cost to produce D2 gas and its storage must be included. Do not forget the massive cost in energy and capital to extract U235 from mined and purified uranium. Evidence from the Case and Arata cells suggest that the active sites are nanoparticles of Pd, or special zones on the surface of solid cathodes/targets. Evidence suggests that measured energy comes from very small active sites which may be destroyed by the violence of the reactions themselves. Thus it may come to pass that active sites have to be manufactured, and they may be "consumed" by the reaction itself. Thus the consumable may be the sites as well as the deuterium. I hope this pessimistic picture is not so. But we simply don't know. All we can say now is that the LENR effects are real, but we don't know what it takes to make them happen on an industrial scale. Our focus should be not on still trying to prove LENR real, but on experiments to characterize active sites so that replicable devices can be built. Then market forces can work their magic as Jed has so often stated. Mike Carrell From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Sep 1 10:35:59 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id KAA03197; Sun, 1 Sep 2002 10:35:20 -0700 Resent-Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 10:35:20 -0700 X-Sent: 1 Sep 2002 17:35:17 GMT Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20020901124539.03212ad8 mail.DIRECTVInternet.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell mail.DIRECTVInternet.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2002 13:08:30 -0400 To: vortex-L eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: Re: Transition to a CF economy In-Reply-To: References: <5.1.0.14.2.20020828104706.02b2b540 mail.DIRECTVInternet.com> <3D6BEDDB.F6709737 ix.netcom.com> <000201c24d1f$397fd8c0$e51b80d9 pavilion> <3D6A59E4.5F310688 ix.netcom.com> <3D6BEDDB.F6709737 ix.netcom.com> <5.1.0.14.2.20020828104706.02b2b540 mail.DIRECTVInternet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <"DniMZ3.0.ln.O_aSz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/47922 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Robin van Spaandonk wrote: > >will go out of business in droves, making it difficult to maintain the > >remaining gasoline vehicles. Gas station profit margins are small. A slight > >This just means that the profit margin at the pump will increase, as >people driving gas powered cars will be forced to pay higher prices for a >scarcer (due to distribution restrictions) product. I do not think so. First, the cost of gasoline will drop below the level anyone can a profit with, because there will be so much raw material left, and so many refineries and tankers. Second, fewer and fewer mechanics will know how to repair the older gasoline powered cars. When the transition from mainframe and minis to microcomputers was half over, the remaining big computer users had difficulty finding trained entry level people and spare parts. The same forced transition occurred with: sailing ships => steam ships steam locomotives => diesel 14" & 8" hard disks => 5.5" disks . . . and in many other transitions. Some of the reasons I have not listed are discussed by Christensen in "The Innovator's Dilemma." >The same dynamics will force a quick changes to other > >fossil fuel based technologies, such as beef production. > >Why do you think that beef production is specifically fossil fuel powered? >(i.e. why no CF powered beef production?) I was confusing two separate issues. Beef production will undergo rapid change, but I do not predict production will be reduced or the industry wiped out. However, rapid change is usually accompanied by increased automation and reduced manpower, even when the change is not prompted by labor cost or manpower shortages. New machinery usually requires fewer operators. I said beef production is fossil fueled because meat production is energy intense. It takes 13,500 kcal of fossil fuel to produce 375 kcal of beef (one serving), compared to 3,065 kcal of fuel per 375 of sweet corn or other vegetables. (Pimentel, p. 192, 193.) > >There will be no CF industry. All of the labor now performed by 400,000 > >skilled workers in the U.S. will be replaced by the labor of a dozen low > >level technicians operating the heavy water extraction machinery. > >That is only for the fuel. You are forgetting the manufacture and >distribution of the devices themselves. I have not forgotten that. The work force now devoted to making gasoline engines and coal, wind and nuclear generators will make CF engines instead. There will be no net increase in employment. In fact, during the transition the labor force will probably contract, for the same reason the meat industry labor force will. I am looking up labor statistics and will report back, but in any case, people working to derive energy from fuel will all lose their jobs. They include, for example, people working at oil wells, tankers, pipelines, refineries, storage tanks, delivery trucks and gas stations. In the electric companies they include everyone who works on power distribution network (half of the power company infrastructure) and all manufacturers of wind turbines, hydroelectric dams, pollution abatement equipment manufacturers. There are host of other supporting industries. Also the DOE will be defunct. I, for one, will not miss it. I believe the total number of workers is around 500,000 in the U.S. These are mainly skilled jobs, except at gas stations. These jobs will vanish within a decade after the introduction of the first CF automobiles and generators. Even the 20% of the oil market now devoted to synthetics can better be met with CF. That will be cheaper, safer and cleaner, and it will require virtually no human labor. I believe the people in charge of the fossil fuel industry realize this, and I suspect they may actively oppose CF for that reason. - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Sep 1 10:36:10 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id KAA03207; Sun, 1 Sep 2002 10:35:21 -0700 Resent-Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 10:35:21 -0700 X-Sent: 1 Sep 2002 17:35:18 GMT Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20020901130917.03236e78 mail.DIRECTVInternet.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell mail.DIRECTVInternet.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2002 13:31:48 -0400 To: vortex-L eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: Re: Transition to a CF economy In-Reply-To: <002401c251ee$52126a00$624eccd1 asus> References: <3D6BEDDB.F6709737 ix.netcom.com> <000201c24d1f$397fd8c0$e51b80d9 pavilion> <3D6A59E4.5F310688 ix.netcom.com> <3D6BEDDB.F6709737 ix.netcom.com> <5.1.0.14..2.20020828104706.02b2b540 mail.DIRECTVInternet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <"aBJVj2.0.vn.O_aSz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/47923 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Mike Carrell wrote: >Discussions about a CF economy are premature until we know what the true >consumables are. I do not think so. To some extent this does not matter as much as it did with previous energy systems, because of the special nature of CF. >There is reason to believe that the successful devices will be gas phase, >so the energy cost to produce D2 gas and its storage must be included. The "energy cost" or "energy overhead" may be high. Suppose the industry consumes 20% of its own energy output. That is roughly how much the oil industry consumes to keep the drills, pipelines, tankers and refineries running. However, the dollar cost of this "energy overhead" will be zero. If it takes a few extra terajoules of energy to keep the heavy water plants running, no one will notice the dollar cost. Actually, I worked out the numbers for heavy water in an unpublished article submitted to I.E., based on present day heavy water production for fission reactors in Canada and India. I found that overheat is likely to high at first, but it should drop to below 1% after the industry is established. >Do not forget the massive cost in energy and capital to extract U235 from >mined and purified uranium. The equipment and pollution cost might be significant, but the energy will cost nothing. Ed Storms thinks that U CF fuel is problematic, for conventional chemical reasons. >Thus it may come to pass that active sites have to be manufactured, and >they may be "consumed" by the reaction itself. Thus the consumable may be >the sites as well as the deuterium. If the metal itself is permanently consumed -- that is, transmuted -- and only Pd can be used for CF, then all bets are off. In that case, CF can only satisfy a small fraction of our energy requirements. I worked out the numbers in the unpublished article. If the Pd is contaminated and has to be remanufactured then the overhead economic & energy cost will be modest. Most of today's Pd production goes into automobile catalytic converters, and it ends up being spewed out into the landscape, especially the soil and water next to major highways, where it may be a major health & environmental threat. Fortunately, CF engines will sealed tight. >I hope this pessimistic picture is not so. But we simply don't know. All >we can say now is that the LENR effects are real, but we don't know what >it takes to make them happen on an industrial scale. On the other hand, we know how much energy the most successful experiments so far have produced, and we know the ratio of material to energy. If CF is ever commercialized, every CF motor will work far better than the best laboratory demonstration yet observed, so we can estimate the overall industry requirements. Joseph Henry performed experiments that showed a telegraph is possible. The first commercial telegraphs installed years later were much better than his demonstration. The first transistors circa 1948 were nowhere near as good as the first commercial products 6 years later. - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Sep 2 10:33:24 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id KAA20343; Mon, 2 Sep 2002 10:32:13 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 10:32:13 -0700 Message-ID: <000701c252a6$b7e3bec0$5e201f41 woh.rr.com> From: "Nicholas Reiter" To: "vortex-L" Subject: Novel EM impulse / ESD generator Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 13:32:31 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Resent-Message-ID: <"NAv4F3.0.iz4.T2wSz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/47924 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Gentlemen, Here is something of a meatier mystery, probably very explainable, but with a novel mechanism...and fun to try too! Follow the tale here... About 6 years ago, I tried replicating a claim from Italy of a mysterious technology device that had purportedly been "received" in a dream state from an alien intelligence. Knowing the potency of dreams - Kekule and the Benzene ring come to mind - I volunteered to build some of said device. The core of the device was supposed to be rock salt nuggets (halite) and liquid phase mercury metal together in a sealed and evacuated ampoule. The original claim was that this was sort of the core mechanism of an appliance that was supposed to be a telepathic amplifier or psychotronic device. When I got around to building some of these mercury / salt vacuum tubes, I came to find that they DID very nicely produce a novel (though not necessarily alien) effect! When gently shaken, to allow the mercury to slosh back and forth over the rock salt, one could see, if in a dark room, sparkles and flashes of plasma from around the halite. If one held the tube near to the antenna of an AM radio, a strong broad band EM "hash" would produce crackling and hissing. Very cool, very peculiar. The system was sensitive to moisture. I generally needed to dessicate the halite and tube before adding the Hg and pumping / sealing. When scoping the emissions, it looked a lot like one might expect - many tiny spikes and bursts of microscopic lightning induced noise. A couple of years ago, I had about 100ml of mercury in a pyrex flask, and I was trying to look for anomalies that might result when the mercury was swirled about. What I found was that even without evacuation, when the mercury was either shaken or swirled strongly and chaotically in the round bottom flask, and held near an AM radio antenna, the same sort of broad band EM "micro-spark" emissions were apparent again, just as they were with the Hg / halite tubes. Well then, today, I found yet another method for producing this effect - whatever exactly it is. One does not need (thankfully) the liquid mercury. Fine gauge lead shot will work fine! I took a pint mason jar, and filled the bottom with about 100 ml of lead shot - I think about 1.5mm diameter (#10??). With the lid off, I dried it in the oven at about 250F for 1/2 hour. I then removed it and let it cool, then put the lid on. If one swirls the jar within about 8 inches of the AM radio antenna, a maelstrom of crackling and hissing results. My guess is that if the jar were evacuated, you would see quite a light show! Putting the shot into a polycarbonate cup produces a similar effect. However, a ceramic coffee cup or tupperware cup give no effect! The emissions are shielded effectively by aluminum foil. For best results, tune to the upper end of the AM band - around 1.5 to 1.6 MHz. What big monkey fun for a Labor Day weekend! Comments are welcome. NR From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Sep 2 11:04:08 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id LAA04062; Mon, 2 Sep 2002 11:03:07 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 11:03:07 -0700 Message-ID: <001401c252c3$becb73a0$0258ccd1 asus> From: "Mike Carrell" To: References: <3D6BEDDB.F6709737 ix.netcom.com> <000201c24d1f$397fd8c0$e51b80d9@pavilion> <3D6A59E4.5F310688@ix.netcom.com> <3D6BEDDB.F6709737@ix.netcom.com> <5.1.0.14..2.20020828104706.02b2b540@mail.DIRECTVInternet.com> <5.1.0.14.2.20020901130917.03236e78@mail.DIRECTVInternet.com> Subject: Re: Transition to a CF economy Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 13:58:44 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Resent-Message-ID: <"xLUCS2.0.O_.RVwSz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/47925 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Jed said: > Mike Carrell wrote: > > >Discussions about a CF economy are premature until we know what the true > >consumables are. > > I do not think so. To some extent this does not matter as much as it did > with previous energy systems, because of the special nature of CF. > > > >There is reason to believe that the successful devices will be gas phase, > >so the energy cost to produce D2 gas and its storage must be included. > > The "energy cost" or "energy overhead" may be high. Suppose the industry > consumes 20% of its own energy output. That is roughly how much the oil > industry consumes to keep the drills, pipelines, tankers and refineries > running. However, the dollar cost of this "energy overhead" will be zero. > If it takes a few extra terajoules of energy to keep the heavy water > plants running, no one will notice the dollar cost. I was thinking in terms of the whole ecosystem energy cycle. It has been argued (perhaps mistakenly) that if one totals the entire energy cost -- mining, refining, transportation, support, etc., of a nuclear plant against the energy output over its life cycle, and then add the energy cost of decommissioning, etc., that the overall balance is negative. Maybe this is just "greenie" rhetoric. If one got D2 by fractional distillation, then energy must be invested to boil all that water, and the heat of evaporation of water is among the highest. The energy yield from the fraction of D2 recovered may well pay for the distillation with energy left over. In that case desert nations can have a healthy industry by boiling sea water to get fresh water and minerals and selling the excess D2 to a world market. Eventually these costs will be reflected in currencies, but that was not what I was thinking of. > > Actually, I worked out the numbers for heavy water in an unpublished > article submitted to I.E., based on present day heavy water production for > fission reactors in Canada and India. I found that overheat is likely to > high at first, but it should drop to below 1% after the industry is > established. > > > >Do not forget the massive cost in energy and capital to extract U235 from > >mined and purified uranium. > > The equipment and pollution cost might be significant, but the energy will > cost nothing. Are you so sure? I haven't seen any numbers. I'd be happy to be wrong in this case. > > Ed Storms thinks that U CF fuel is problematic, for conventional chemical > reasons. > > > >Thus it may come to pass that active sites have to be manufactured, and > >they may be "consumed" by the reaction itself. Thus the consumable may be > >the sites as well as the deuterium. > > If the metal itself is permanently consumed -- that is, transmuted -- and > only Pd can be used for CF, then all bets are off. In that case, CF can > only satisfy a small fraction of our energy requirements. I worked out the > numbers in the unpublished article. If the Pd is contaminated and has to be > remanufactured then the overhead economic & energy cost will be modest. A point was missed. My word "manufactured" includes in the extreme the use of wafer fab technology to create arrays of carefully tailored active sites. This is not as tricky as making transistors, but if such were necessary and a wafer of LENR sites cost $100 and produced 10 kWh of energy because all the sites got blasted, then the process would not be cheap. If it turns out that the LENR effect depends on a narrow range of atomic arrangements and doping which are destroyed in the reaction, then we are in trouble. Remember that Patterson looked like he had a wonderful way to make a CF cell until suddenly the process went dead because it depended on some variable he was unaware of and could not control. One of the tragedies of the CF quest is that he did not sell out to Motorola, whose pockets are very deep. Miley has not made any public progress with his thin film approach. I believe Jed mentioned that a Chinese researcher reported at ICCF-9 that he has some success in working with Patterson-style beads. What we hope for is a coating process that will produce acres of doped nanoparticle Pd (or other) that works well and is disposable if necessary. But we are not there yet. When we are there, then the macroeconomic effects Jed has mentioned can take effect. > > Most of today's Pd production goes into automobile catalytic converters, > and it ends up being spewed out into the landscape, especially the soil and > water next to major highways, where it may be a major health & > environmental threat. Fortunately, CF engines will sealed tight. > > > >I hope this pessimistic picture is not so. But we simply don't know. All > >we can say now is that the LENR effects are real, but we don't know what > >it takes to make them happen on an industrial scale. > > On the other hand, we know how much energy the most successful experiments > so far have produced, and we know the ratio of material to energy. If CF is > ever commercialized, every CF motor will work far better than the best > laboratory demonstration yet observed, so we can estimate the overall > industry requirements. Joseph Henry performed experiments that showed a > telegraph is possible. The first commercial telegraphs installed years > later were much better than his demonstration. The first transistors circa > 1948 were nowhere near as good as the first commercial products 6 years later. > > - Jed > > > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Sep 2 11:44:14 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id LAA26323; Mon, 2 Sep 2002 11:43:04 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 11:43:04 -0700 Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 14:43:33 -0400 (EDT) From: John Schnurer To: Vortex , Schnurer Subject: Please: Help find physics experiment by Raymond Chaio Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Resent-Message-ID: <"f3Fv61.0.DR6.t4xSz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/47926 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Dear Vo, Does anyone know where to find descriptions of the physics experiment by Raymond Chaio? He wrote he would conduct to verify or explore his theory of action of high Tc superconductors and microwave energy. The experiment is described as investigation of interaction between high Tc superconductors and microwave electromagnetic energy. Please request to various groups to ask if anyone has been able to find his experimental physics, description of same and URL if available. Thank you, JH From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Sep 2 12:00:49 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id LAA04097; Mon, 2 Sep 2002 11:59:45 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 11:59:45 -0700 Message-ID: <3D73B518.A0139FAC bellsouth.net> Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2002 14:59:36 -0400 From: Terry Blanton X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.74 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Please: Help find physics experiment by Raymond Chaio References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"Pthvr2.0.x_.XKxSz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/47927 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: John Schnurer wrote: > Dear Vo, > > Does anyone know where to find descriptions of the physics > experiment by Raymond Chaio? http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/bpp/summ.htm Fourth one down. Terry From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Sep 2 12:13:41 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id MAA11465; Mon, 2 Sep 2002 12:12:58 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 12:12:58 -0700 Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2002 12:11:46 -0700 From: Jones Beene Subject: Re: Please: Help find physics experiment by Raymond Chaio To: vortex-l eskimo.com Message-id: <001101c252b4$952954e0$0a016ea8 cpq> MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-priority: Normal References: Resent-Message-ID: <"sOX5l3.0.-o2.wWxSz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/47928 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: > Does anyone know where to find descriptions of the physics > experiment by Raymond Chaio? If you mean Raymond Chiao of Berkeley, then SciAm carried this article a couple of months ago: http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=00032353-36AB-1CDC-B4A8809EC588EEDF&c atID=2 The is a citation to Chiao's paper in the article... From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Sep 2 12:16:59 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id MAA13162; Mon, 2 Sep 2002 12:16:18 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 12:16:18 -0700 X-Sender: rmuha mail Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <000701c252a6$b7e3bec0$5e201f41 woh.rr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 15:16:15 -0400 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: ralph muha Subject: Re: Novel EM impulse / ESD generator Resent-Message-ID: <"AEhtf1.0.aD3.2axSz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/47929 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: >I took a pint mason jar, and filled the bottom with about 100 ml of lead >shot - I think about 1.5mm diameter (#10??). With the lid off, I dried it >in the oven at about 250F for 1/2 hour. I then removed it and let it cool, >then put the lid on. wouldn't it have been better to put the lid on immediately? then, as the jar cooled, you would have had a partial vacuum inside... From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Sep 2 12:31:04 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id MAA19953; Mon, 2 Sep 2002 12:30:17 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 12:30:17 -0700 X-Sent: 2 Sep 2002 19:30:14 GMT Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20020902142413.0323e698 mail.DIRECTVInternet.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell mail.DIRECTVInternet.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2002 15:17:39 -0400 To: vortex-L eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: Re: Transition to a CF economy In-Reply-To: <001401c252c3$becb73a0$0258ccd1 asus> References: <3D6BEDDB.F6709737 ix.netcom.com> <000201c24d1f$397fd8c0$e51b80d9 pavilion> <3D6A59E4.5F310688 ix.netcom.com> <3D6BEDDB.F6709737 ix.netcom.com> <5.1.0.14..2.20020828104706.02b2b540 mail.DIRECTVInternet.com> <5.1.0.14.2.20020901130917.03236e78 mail.DIRECTVInternet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <"sjPUu3.0.ht4.9nxSz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/47930 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Mike Carrell wrote: >I was thinking in terms of the whole ecosystem energy cycle. It has been >argued (perhaps mistakenly) that if one totals the entire energy cost -- >mining, refining, transportation, support, etc., of a nuclear plant against >the energy output over its life cycle, and then add the energy cost of >decommissioning, etc., that the overall balance is negative. I doubt it. I have not run the numbers for that, but for the embodied energy in the building materials and construction for the plant itself, industry literature generally says the "energy payback time" is 6 months. This is not as good as a a gas-fired turbine or wind turbine, which pay back in 1 or 2 months. The mining & refining of fuel does take a lot of energy, but fission produces prodigious amounts per gram. Only a few big plants have been decommissioned so the data is hard to come by, but costs are expected to be in the range of 0.1 ~ 1.0 cents per kWh electricity for all of the electricity generated over the life of the plant. That is reasonable. The industry is now putting aside 0.1 cents for decommissioning, by law. Some anti-nuke experts say this is not enough, but no one claims the number should be 6 cents or 10 cents/kWh, which would be more than the market value of the electricity. Bear in mind that present day fission reactors are incredibly inefficient. Only ~4% of the potential fission reactions occur, as I recall, and only 1/3rd of the heat converts to electricity. It is on par with the Newcomen steam engine in 1712. It is like cutting down an entire tree to manufacture a toothpick. >If one got D2 by fractional distillation, then energy must be invested to >boil all that water, and the heat of evaporation of water is among the >highest. The energy yield from the fraction of D2 recovered may well pay >for the distillation with energy left over. It would pay for it MANY, MANY times over! At present, it takes 38,000 MJ/kg to extract heavy water. (Heavy Water Board, Department of Atomic Energy, Government of India, Mumbai, http://www.heavywaterboard.org/docs/prenov14.htm). The techniques have not improved much since the 1950s. Mitsubishi and others have proposed much more efficient methods with cheaper equipment. Early model CF reactors will only convert a tiny fraction of the potential energy in a kilogram of heavy water into useful heat, but even so, the potential fusion energy in 1 kg of D2O is 115,000,000 MJ, or ~3,000 times more than it take to produce the D2O. >In that case desert nations can have a healthy industry by boiling sea >water to get fresh water and minerals and selling the excess D2 to a world >market. The D2 will be worth nothing. Once CF reactors becomes reasonably efficient, the entire world will consume ~10,000 tons of D2O per year, which will be produced as needed by a few modest sized machines on site in factories. That is, factories where they make automobile motors or home generators. The fuel will be built in, and it will last for the life of the machine. Shipping & storing heavy water contaminates it it would not be worth shipping a few tons from North Africa to an auto plant in Michigan, when the plant in Michigan can make that water itself at essentially zero cost. However, I predict that desert nations will build a healthy industry boiling water. They will produce the most valuable substance on earth: fresh water. It is the most common substance, yet the most valuable. Fifty years after they begin doing this, there will be no desert nations. Large chunks of North Africa & the Gobi will once again be the most verdant and productive farmland on earth, as it was in ancient Roman times before our ancestors ruined it. In fact, there will be no deserts anywhere except the ones we want: areas preserved as huge national parks. (It would be a dreadful thing to eliminate *all* deserts! We only want to reclaim the ones our ancestors created by accident.) As a side benefit, these formerly-desert nations may eventually extract enough minerals and metals from the concentrated brine to shut down most mines on earth, and lower the cost of magnesium by a few orders of magnitude. That will become particularly useful as agriculture finally comes to an end, and we produce food in a more efficient, ecologically sound manner. > > The equipment and pollution cost might be significant, but the energy will > > cost nothing. > >Are you so sure? I haven't seen any numbers. I'd be happy to be wrong in >this case. Any amount of energy will cost nothing. We will have enough to terraform Mars, ship the Sierra Nevada mountain range to Jupiter, or break the moon into small chunks and never miss the energy. We will not count the cost of energy for any project on any scale any more than American Indians did when they set fire to millions of acres of forest. They did that to keep the forests healthy, burn the underbrush and increase the game animal population. The Indians used up billions of megajoules of energy without a second thought -- and of course there was no reason to worry about it, and no shortage of firewood! >A point was missed. My word "manufactured" includes in the extreme the use >of wafer fab technology to create arrays of carefully tailored active >sites. This is not as tricky as making transistors, but if such were >necessary and a wafer of LENR sites cost $100 and produced 10 kWh of >energy because all the sites got blasted, then the process would not be >cheap. If it turns out that the LENR effect depends on a narrow range of >atomic arrangements and doping which are destroyed in the reaction, then >we are in trouble. This cannot be long term problem. Already, a few CF cathodes have produced prodigious amounts of energy, enough to be commercially viable. (That is, to pay for the Pd or Ni and whatever processing they underwent). Pd and ceramics have melted. It happened accidentally and we have no idea how to reproduce it, but before the first commercial generator is installed, we will have to learn all of that and more. If it can be done once in a laboratory now, after heroic measures and hundreds of failed attempts, it will someday be done routinely in millions of machines. Think of difficult it was for Edison et al. to make the first prototype incandescent light, and how many failed attempts they made. Ten years later there were millions of reliable lights. >Remember that Patterson looked like he had a wonderful way to make a CF >cell until suddenly the process went dead because it depended on some >variable he was unaware of and could not control. There *must be* a way to control it. Until we find that variable, CF will not be commercialized. There is no reason to think this elusive variable is particularly difficult to find, compared to the variables that screw up the production of countless other products such as batteries, paint, beer, CRTs and so on. I expect all it will take is money. CF is not magic. Even if the mechanism remains unknown, we will find the material parameters that control it. >One of the tragedies of the CF quest is that he did not sell out to >Motorola, whose pockets are very deep. !^ #&$!!! No comment. - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Sep 2 12:52:56 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id MAA30128; Mon, 2 Sep 2002 12:51:57 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 12:51:57 -0700 Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 15:52:15 -0400 (EDT) From: John Schnurer To: Jones Beene cc: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Please: Help find physics experiment by Raymond Chaio In-Reply-To: <001101c252b4$952954e0$0a016ea8 cpq> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Resent-Message-ID: <"VFVXS1.0.cM7.S5ySz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/47931 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Dear JB, Did the Article convey the Results of the Experiment? On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, Jones Beene wrote: > > > Does anyone know where to find descriptions of the physics > > experiment by Raymond Chaio? > > If you mean Raymond Chiao of Berkeley, then SciAm carried this article a couple > of months ago: > http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=00032353-36AB-1CDC-B4A8809EC588EEDF&c > atID=2 > > The is a citation to Chiao's paper in the article... > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Sep 2 12:59:04 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id MAA01792; Mon, 2 Sep 2002 12:58:20 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 12:58:20 -0700 Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2002 12:57:06 -0700 From: Jones Beene Subject: Re: Novel EM impulse / ESD generator To: vortex-l eskimo.com Message-id: <002901c252ba$ea7dc1a0$0a016ea8 cpq> MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-priority: Normal References: <000701c252a6$b7e3bec0$5e201f41 woh.rr.com> Resent-Message-ID: <"KQQI83.0.qR.RBySz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/47932 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: > If one swirls the jar within about 8 inches of the AM radio antenna, a > maelstrom of crackling and hissing results. My guess is that if the jar > were evacuated, you would see quite a light show! Putting the shot into a > polycarbonate cup produces a similar effect. However, a ceramic coffee cup > or tupperware cup give no effect! The emissions are shielded effectively by > aluminum foil. For best results, tune to the upper end of the AM band - > around 1.5 to 1.6 MHz. > > What big monkey fun for a Labor Day weekend! Comments are welcome. Depending on how la-bored you are today, here are some keywords (for a Google search) that may help: 1) Triboelectricity insulator dielectric (Triboelectric currents are generated by charges created between a vibrating conductors and insulator due to friction 2) "electron-phonon interaction" Also, there is a lot of information in the vortex archives from Fred Sparber on the possible correlation of LL (light lepton) phenomena with static electricity and ESD A possible secondary experiment/s comes to mind - Objective: to determine if there is any correlation between the volume (or size) of lead shot being vibrated and the peak RF frequency emission... From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Sep 2 14:04:48 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id OAA30759; Mon, 2 Sep 2002 14:03:45 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 14:03:45 -0700 Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 17:04:08 -0400 (EDT) From: John Schnurer To: Nicholas Reiter cc: vortex-L Subject: Re: Novel EM impulse / ESD generator In-Reply-To: <000701c252a6$b7e3bec0$5e201f41 woh.rr.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Resent-Message-ID: <"8OKRo2.0.XW7.m8zSz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/47933 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Dear Nick, The Giessler Tube: The URL, below is..."OK" but not great. http://chem.ch.huji.ac.il/~eugeniik/history/geissler.html The classic Geissler tube was evacuated, and a mixture of inert gasses and air, hydrogen or others was allowed to enter and then the tube was pumped down to lower pressures. An amount of mercury was then allowed to flow into the tube. Then several factors were controlled to allow for good light output and novel coors and performance: A) The internal diameter of the tube was limited in some but maybe not all of the length, by design. B) The glass paths and the varying diameters were designed to interact with; C) An appropriate mass of Mercury. D) Often the physical size of the mass of Hg was such that it could completely block off the Internal Diameter of the tube and its physical weight could and did vary the pressures on one side of the mass and the other. E) The friction of the Hg made a high enough triboelectric level of voltage to cause discharges and a wonderful play of ever changing lights would result as long as the user shook, tilted and otherwise agitated the tube.... F) No external electric current was NEEDED... but the tubes were often connected to "Static Machines" and or other sources of electricity. UC Ultra Cool On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, Nicholas Reiter wrote: > Gentlemen, > > Here is something of a meatier mystery, probably very explainable, but with > a novel mechanism...and fun to try too! Follow the tale here... > > About 6 years ago, I tried replicating a claim from Italy of a mysterious > technology device that had purportedly been "received" in a dream state from > an alien intelligence. Knowing the potency of dreams - Kekule and the > Benzene ring come to mind - I volunteered to build some of said device. The > core of the device was supposed to be rock salt nuggets (halite) and liquid > phase mercury metal together in a sealed and evacuated ampoule. The > original claim was that this was sort of the core mechanism of an appliance > that was supposed to be a telepathic amplifier or psychotronic device. > > When I got around to building some of these mercury / salt vacuum tubes, I > came to find that they DID very nicely produce a novel (though not > necessarily alien) effect! When gently shaken, to allow the mercury to > slosh back and forth over the rock salt, one could see, if in a dark room, > sparkles and flashes of plasma from around the halite. If one held the tube > near to the antenna of an AM radio, a strong broad band EM "hash" would > produce crackling and hissing. Very cool, very peculiar. The system was > sensitive to moisture. I generally needed to dessicate the halite and tube > before adding the Hg and pumping / sealing. When scoping the emissions, it > looked a lot like one might expect - many tiny spikes and bursts of > microscopic lightning induced noise. > > A couple of years ago, I had about 100ml of mercury in a pyrex flask, and I > was trying to look for anomalies that might result when the mercury was > swirled about. What I found was that even without evacuation, when the > mercury was either shaken or swirled strongly and chaotically in the round > bottom flask, and held near an AM radio antenna, the same sort of broad band > EM "micro-spark" emissions were apparent again, just as they were with the > Hg / halite tubes. > > Well then, today, I found yet another method for producing this effect - > whatever exactly it is. One does not need (thankfully) the liquid mercury. > Fine gauge lead shot will work fine! > > I took a pint mason jar, and filled the bottom with about 100 ml of lead > shot - I think about 1.5mm diameter (#10??). With the lid off, I dried it > in the oven at about 250F for 1/2 hour. I then removed it and let it cool, > then put the lid on. > > If one swirls the jar within about 8 inches of the AM radio antenna, a > maelstrom of crackling and hissing results. My guess is that if the jar > were evacuated, you would see quite a light show! Putting the shot into a > polycarbonate cup produces a similar effect. However, a ceramic coffee cup > or tupperware cup give no effect! The emissions are shielded effectively by > aluminum foil. For best results, tune to the upper end of the AM band - > around 1.5 to 1.6 MHz. > > What big monkey fun for a Labor Day weekend! Comments are welcome. > > NR > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Sep 2 14:09:47 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id OAA01799; Mon, 2 Sep 2002 14:08:57 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 14:08:57 -0700 Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 17:09:26 -0400 (EDT) From: John Schnurer To: Jones Beene cc: Vortex , Schnurer Subject: Chiao In-Reply-To: <002901c252ba$ea7dc1a0$0a016ea8 cpq> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Resent-Message-ID: <"sMbls3.0.xR.fDzSz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/47934 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Thear JB, Chiao Writes: " ....... A simple, Hertz-like experiment has been performed to test these ideas, and preliminary results will be reported. ........" PLEASE: Do you have this information about the results of: The "......simple, Hertz-like experiment ......" Or even the configuration of the set up? THANKS <------- JH From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Sep 2 15:09:06 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id PAA00560; Mon, 2 Sep 2002 15:07:58 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 15:07:58 -0700 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: RE: Novel EM impulse / ESD generator X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: ID = c91e089dc7912cc936270c163f59fb65 Reply-To: michael.foster excite.com From: "Michael Foster" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: michael.foster excite.com X-Mailer: PHP Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20020902220719.A37448AF9D xmxpita.excite.com> Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 18:07:19 -0400 (EDT) Resent-Message-ID: <"6zb-h.0.c8.-4-Sz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/47935 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: These effects have a long history. In 1676 the French astronomer Jean Picard noticed this very phenomenon when moving his mercury barometer in a darkened room. This eventually led to the creation of glass frictional electrostatic machines by Hauksbee and others in the early 1700s. This is sort of interesting because glass is not an obvious choice for triboelectric charging. It's kind of hard to get started. Most of the globe, cylinder and disk type glass machines had leather friction pads impregnated with a tin-mercury amalgam. Faraday mentions smearing this amalgam on a silk cloth in order to rub a glass tube to charge it. You were fortunate to have swirled your mercury around in a Pyerex flask because I have discovered that modern common bottle glass is quite conductive at these voltages and almost impossible to charge frictionally. I have no idea whether this is intentional or coincidental. Maybe the manufacturers want to prevent the accidental formation of Leyden jars. Other metals besides mercury and lead will work. You can rub a piece of aluminum foil on a Pyrex or other borosilicate glass to get quite a crackling noise on the AM band. M. ------------------------------------------------ Changed your e-mail? Keep your contacts! Use this free e-mail change of address service from Return Path. Register now! From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Sep 2 20:20:29 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id UAA16270; Mon, 2 Sep 2002 20:16:52 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 20:16:52 -0700 From: Robin van Spaandonk To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Transition to a CF economy Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2002 13:16:13 +1000 Organization: Improving Message-ID: References: <000201c24d1f$397fd8c0$e51b80d9 pavilion> <3D6A59E4.5F310688@ix.netcom.com> <3D6BEDDB.F6709737@ix.netcom.com> <5.1.0.14..2.20020828104706.02b2b540@mail.DIRECTVInternet.com> <5.1.0.14.2.20020901130917.03236e78@mail.DIRECTVInternet.com> <001401c252c3$becb73a0$0258ccd1@asus> <5.1.0.14.2.20020902142413.0323e698@mail.DIRECTVInternet.com> In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20020902142413.0323e698 mail.DIRECTVInternet.com> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.92/32.572 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id UAA16230 Resent-Message-ID: <"WmyY93.0.7-3.Zc2Tz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/47936 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Mon, 02 Sep 2002 15:17:39 -0400: Hi, [snip] >Bear in mind that present day fission reactors are incredibly inefficient. >Only ~4% of the potential fission reactions occur, as I recall, and only This doesn't sound right. If only 4% of the fissionable material has been used up, then surely a 4% withdrawal of the dampening rods would compensate (first order approximation). The 4% number sounds to me more like an enrichment %. [snip] >>One of the tragedies of the CF quest is that he did not sell out to >>Motorola, whose pockets are very deep. Perhaps now that he has problems he would be more open to a deal with Motorola, though I suspect the price would be somewhat lower now. [snip] Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ Competition provides the motivation, Cooperation provides the means. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Sep 4 08:23:19 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id IAA00533; Wed, 4 Sep 2002 08:21:25 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2002 08:21:25 -0700 Message-ID: <3D76254C.1060704 rtpatlanta.com> Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2002 11:22:52 -0400 From: "Terry Blanton" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Government Statistical Database Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"8VNM_.0.F8.rJYTz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/47937 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: The University of Michigan maintains a significant government statistical database including one category on energy at: http://www.lib.umich.edu/govdocs/statsnew.html FYI Terry From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Sep 4 14:42:50 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id OAA13014; Wed, 4 Sep 2002 14:40:12 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2002 14:40:12 -0700 X-Sent: 4 Sep 2002 21:40:05 GMT Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20020904173022.03274e40 mail.DIRECTVInternet.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell mail.DIRECTVInternet.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2002 17:40:02 -0400 To: vortex-L eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: Need proofreader for "Accountability in Research" articles Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <"Ygu5x.0.BB3.xsdTz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/47938 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Adil Shamoo, the editor of the journal "Accountability in Research," has graciously given us permission to reprint all eight articles from the 2000 issue of the journal devoted to cold fusion. Scott Chubb sent me the manuscripts of the articles in Microsoft Word format. Some of the manuscripts were changed slightly before the final paper version was published. I do not have a paper copy. Scott is sending me one. If anyone has a printed copy, would you please volunteer to proofread some of these papers? - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Sep 4 18:29:14 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id SAA10428; Wed, 4 Sep 2002 18:27:46 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2002 18:27:46 -0700 Message-ID: <3D76B30E.3030106 rtpatlanta.com> Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2002 21:27:42 -0400 From: Terry Blanton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Article on Casimir Effect Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"CmwN2.0.rY2.IChTz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/47939 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: "Hope you got airbag." A quotation from "Independence Day" presages a real life application of the disputed force: http://physicsweb.org/article/world/15/9/6 Terry From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Sep 4 19:38:24 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id TAA08859; Wed, 4 Sep 2002 19:35:12 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2002 19:35:12 -0700 Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2002 16:34:58 -1000 Subject: Re: Article on Casimir Effect Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v543) From: Rick Monteverde To: vortex-l eskimo.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <3D76B30E.3030106 rtpatlanta.com> Message-Id: <123A52E5-C078-11D6-9408-000A27916CBC highsurf.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.543) Resent-Message-ID: <"wBaHQ1.0.LA2.VBiTz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/47940 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: On Wednesday, September 4, 2002, at 03:27 PM, Terry Blanton wrote: >"Hope you got airbag." Well, we got gecko. Isn't that what holds their little lizard-feet to the falls with their billion miniscule foot-hairs? >A quotation from "Independence Day" presages a real life >application of the disputed force: From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Sep 5 09:37:46 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id JAA03564; Thu, 5 Sep 2002 09:36:26 -0700 Resent-Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 09:36:26 -0700 Message-ID: <3D778868.9050608 rtpatlanta.com> Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2002 12:38:00 -0400 From: "Terry Blanton" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Article on Casimir Effect References: <123A52E5-C078-11D6-9408-000A27916CBC highsurf.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"WC02b3.0.ct.AWuTz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/47941 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Rick Monteverde wrote: > Well, we got gecko. Isn't that what holds their little lizard-feet to > the falls with their billion miniscule foot-hairs? Yep, more hairs than Bilbo Baggins: http://www.washtimes.com/culture/20020828-15736904.htm Terry (who's car insurance is from gecko) From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Sep 6 18:29:03 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id SAA04557; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 18:27:54 -0700 Resent-Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 18:27:54 -0700 Message-ID: <3D7956DD.695C4741 ix.netcom.com> Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2002 18:31:09 -0700 From: Akira Kawasaki X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en]C-CCK-MCD NSCPCD472 (Win95; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Vortex Subject: [Fwd: What's New for Sep 06, 2002] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"AwrLc1.0.y61.POLUz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/47942 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: -------- Original Message -------- Subject: What's New for Sep 06, 2002 Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 16:52:14 -0400 (EDT) From: "What's New" To: aki ix.netcom.com WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 6 Sep 02 Washington, DC 1. HERBAL NONSENSE: DON'T MESS AROUND WITH MOTHER NATURE. Even as many of the most popular herbal medications failed miserably when subjected to actual tests (WN 23 Aug 02), one concoction of saw palmetto, said to include seven Chinese and Indian herbs, seemed to be just as effective in treating prostate cancer as the latest prescription drugs. This was not as remarkable as it seemed: as a natural dietary supplement, PC-SPES could be sold over the counter without proof of purity or effectiveness (WN 16 Aug 02). But the FDA contended PC-SPES contained prescription- only drugs, and pulled it off the market. It is now confirmed by independent laboratories that PC-SPES contained warfarin, a blood thinner, indomethacin, an analgesic, and synthetic estrogen. These are prescription-only drugs not found in nature. 2. PATENT NONSENSE: COURT DENIES BLACKLIGHT POWER APPEAL. The status of BlackLight Power's intellectual property is fuzzier than ever. BLP was awarded Patent 6,024,935 for "Lower-Energy Hydrogen Methods and Structures," a process for getting hydrogen atoms into a "state below the ground state" (WN 18 Feb 00). You might expect these shrunken hydrogen atoms, called "hydrinos," to have a pretty special chemistry. Do they ever! Indeed, a second patent application titled "Hydride Compounds" had been assigned a number and BLP had paid the fee. Several other patents were in the works. That's when things started heading South. Prompted by an outside inquiry (who would do such a thing?), the patent director became concerned that this hydrino stuff required the orbital electron to behave "contrary to the known laws of physics and chemistry." The Hydride Compounds application was withdrawn for further review and the other patent applications were rejected. Since the one patent already issued involves the same violations of basic laws of physics, there is a cloud over its status as well. BLP filed suit in federal court arguing that it was too late for the Patent Office to change its mind. The court was not impressed, so BLP appealed the decision. In denying the appeal, the court said the Patent Office has a responsibility to take "extraordinary action" to withdraw a questionable patent. The long-awaited IPO may have to wait a little longer. 3. LANCE BASS: MAYBE THE RUSSIANS JUST DON'T LIKE MUSIC. Russian space officials say the boy-band star stiffed them on the $20M fare to the ISS, so they evicted him from Star City and gave his seat on Soyuz to a box of supplies. But MirCorp still needs the dollars, and deals are still being discussed. One is said to involve a major soft drink company. Pepsi and Coke have fought it out in space for years. Mir cosmonauts inflated a giant Pepsi can on a space walk (WN 5 Nov 99), while Coke was involved in developing a $3M micro-gravity Coke machine that gave only foam when it was tested before a world-wide audience on television. THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND and THE AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY Opinions are the author's, and are not necessarily shared by the University or the American Physical Society, but they should be. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Sep 7 13:34:47 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id NAA01094; Sat, 7 Sep 2002 13:33:38 -0700 Resent-Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2002 13:33:38 -0700 Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2002 16:34:04 -0400 (EDT) From: John Schnurer To: vortex-l eskimo.com, jhermanschnurer@netscape.net Subject: Searching for US ceramic magnet source, medium to high volume sales Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Resent-Message-ID: <"lJkEv1.0.0H.XAcUz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/47943 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Dear Vo, I am searching for a permanent magnet supplier in the US, hopefully. I am intending to buy a large number of powerful ceramic magnets. IN INCHES size ~~ 0.375 (3/8") by 0.875 (7/8") by 1.875 ( 1 and 7/8") these are about the size used in the ramps found in www.theverylastpageoftheinternet.com I am looking to purchase 200 plus and will consider fewer or greater numbers. Thank you, JH Schnurer From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Sep 7 13:54:18 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id NAA08286; Sat, 7 Sep 2002 13:53:41 -0700 Resent-Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2002 13:53:41 -0700 X-Originating-IP: [209.249.70.218] From: "Mark Goldes" To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Searching for US ceramic magnet source, medium to high volume sales Date: Sat, 07 Sep 2002 13:53:09 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Sep 2002 20:53:09.0375 (UTC) FILETIME=[929C60F0:01C256B0] Resent-Message-ID: <"dPyxs2.0.K12.KTcUz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/47944 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: John, You might try Dowling-Miner in Sonoma, CA. Best, Mark >From: John Schnurer >Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com >To: vortex-l eskimo.com, jhermanschnurer@netscape.net >Subject: Searching for US ceramic magnet source, medium to high volume >sales >Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2002 16:34:04 -0400 (EDT) > > > Dear Vo, > > I am searching for a permanent magnet supplier in the US, >hopefully. I am intending to buy a large number of powerful ceramic >magnets. > IN INCHES > size ~~ 0.375 (3/8") by 0.875 (7/8") by 1.875 ( 1 and 7/8") > > these are about the size used in the ramps found in > www.theverylastpageoftheinternet.com > > I am looking to purchase 200 plus and will consider fewer or > greater numbers. > > Thank you, > > JH Schnurer _________________________________________________________________ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Sep 8 05:07:32 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id FAA31737; Sun, 8 Sep 2002 05:06:28 -0700 Resent-Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2002 05:06:28 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: rick mail.highsurf.com (Unverified) Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2002 02:06:21 -1000 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Rick Monteverde Subject: Re: Searching for US ceramic magnet source, medium to high volume sales Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Resent-Message-ID: <"LTW1a2.0.pl7.4rpUz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/47945 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: What... catch a dose of SMOT fever? ;) - Rick Monteverde, Honolulu Hawaii > Dear Vo, > > I am searching for a permanent magnet supplier in the US, >hopefully. I am intending to buy a large number of powerful ceramic >magnets. > IN INCHES > size ~~ 0.375 (3/8") by 0.875 (7/8") by 1.875 ( 1 and 7/8") > > these are about the size used in the ramps found in > www.theverylastpageoftheinternet.com > > I am looking to purchase 200 plus and will consider fewer or > greater numbers. > > Thank you, > > JH Schnurer From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Sep 8 06:32:14 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id GAA24942; Sun, 8 Sep 2002 06:31:15 -0700 Resent-Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2002 06:31:15 -0700 Message-ID: <001b01c2573b$4af8c6e0$7cfea8c0 newmicronpc> From: "jonfli" To: References: Subject: Re: Searching for US ceramic magnet source, medium to high volume sales Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2002 08:26:08 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Resent-Message-ID: <"-z0A8.0.e56.Y4rUz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/47946 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: John, Try Bunting Magnetics at- http://www.bunting-magnetics.com/magnets/index_ceramic.htm They have a variety of materials and sizes plus ship from stock and offer quantity discounts. Regards, Jon ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Schnurer" To: ; Sent: Saturday, September 07, 2002 3:34 PM Subject: Searching for US ceramic magnet source, medium to high volume sales > > Dear Vo, > > I am searching for a permanent magnet supplier in the US, > hopefully. I am intending to buy a large number of powerful ceramic > magnets. > IN INCHES > size ~~ 0.375 (3/8") by 0.875 (7/8") by 1.875 ( 1 and 7/8") > > these are about the size used in the ramps found in > www.theverylastpageoftheinternet.com > > I am looking to purchase 200 plus and will consider fewer or > greater numbers. > > Thank you, > > JH Schnurer > > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Sep 8 15:35:16 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id PAA22964; Sun, 8 Sep 2002 15:33:57 -0700 Resent-Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2002 15:33:57 -0700 Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2002 18:34:22 -0400 (EDT) From: John Schnurer Reply-To: John Schnurer To: Rick Monteverde cc: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: DM...! Searching for US ceramic magnet source, medium to high , volume sales In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Resent-Message-ID: <"V1oV71.0.jc5.L1zUz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/47947 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Dang man! That sounds icky-pucky ....eeeuuuwwww uuhhhhh.... doah you ears fall off if you hammah SMOT fever? ......an if youah eeeoahs faaahhw ouuff .... howem you heah anydding affah thdat? I think I am fine..... Colin seems to have found an AMAZING source... that is IF his information is true..... Colin writes: "....420 magnets (3/4 x 1/2 grade 3, ceramics) cut specifically....." This is some bodacious cutting...... 3/4 by 1/2 ... I am guessing inches ......These must be REALLY thin! If they have the normal strength of type 3 ceramics...then a stack of 420 should be good and FLAT .... andreallypotent. The only part I have so far is this Chinese connection..... I have NO idea how long it would take to order and get .... Any US people you know of???? On Sun, 8 Sep 2002, Rick Monteverde wrote: > What... catch a dose of SMOT fever? ;) > > - Rick Monteverde, > Honolulu Hawaii > > > > > > Dear Vo, > > > > I am searching for a permanent magnet supplier in the US, > >hopefully. I am intending to buy a large number of powerful ceramic > >magnets. > > IN INCHES > > size ~~ 0.375 (3/8") by 0.875 (7/8") by 1.875 ( 1 and 7/8") > > > > these are about the size used in the ramps found in > > www.theverylastpageoftheinternet.com > > > > I am looking to purchase 200 plus and will consider fewer or > > greater numbers. > > > > Thank you, > > > > JH Schnurer > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Sep 8 15:38:48 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id PAA23772; Sun, 8 Sep 2002 15:36:12 -0700 Resent-Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2002 15:36:12 -0700 Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2002 18:36:39 -0400 (EDT) From: John Schnurer To: Colin Quinney cc: Vortex Subject: 3/4 by 1/2 by WHAT???? and how long to get 'em? US please In-Reply-To: <024901c2576b$bfa8c0a0$6401a8c0 cs910664a> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from QUOTED-PRINTABLE to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id PAA23741 Resent-Message-ID: <"s2hbC2.0.Hp5.R3zUz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/47948 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: I would MUCH rather a US supplier.... how long will it take to order, and come from China??? 3 weeks by boat.... or 7 days by air at 7.6 gazillion USD??? On Sun, 8 Sep 2002, Colin Quinney wrote: > OFF LIST > > Dear John, > > If you order direct from China, you can find the lowest cost magnets I've > yet seen. > > A member of the Hamel list purchased ceramic magnets from China direct from > factory. Yuxiang Magnetic Materials Ind. Co. Ltd. > http://www.magnets.com.cn/in3a.htm > > His cost of 420 magnets (3/4 x 1/2 grade 3, ceramics) cut specifically for > him was £20, (about US $30.00) plus cost of transport. So the magnets alone > cost him about (US) 7 cents each. In-stock items should cost even less. If > you send them your required size information, they will ship via various > methods at your request. Try to get standard sizes (in-stock, & less > expensive). Contact them for quotes. You must pay the shipping costs and > which will probably cost more than the merchandise itself. > > To avoid any possible misunderstandings, you might even consider mailing > them a sample magnet and then ask for quotes on "in-stock" similar (or > identical) size for quantities of 100, 500, 1000, etc. > > If you are going to attempt the "closed loop" Adsitt Ramp all I can say is > that watching the video his variation looked a LOT more promising than the > SMOT. > http://www.theverylastpageoftheinternet.com/menu/adsitt.htm > > Good luck. > > Colin > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "John Schnurer" > To: ; > Sent: Saturday, September 07, 2002 4:34 PM > Subject: Searching for US ceramic magnet source, medium to high volume sales > > > > > > Dear Vo, > > > > I am searching for a permanent magnet supplier in the US, > > hopefully. I am intending to buy a large number of powerful ceramic > > magnets. > > IN INCHES > > size ~~ 0.375 (3/8") by 0.875 (7/8") by 1.875 ( 1 and 7/8") > > these are about the size used in the ramps found in > > www.theverylastpageoftheinternet.com > > > > I am looking to purchase 200 plus and will consider fewer or > > greater numbers. > > > > Thank you, > > > > JH Schnurer > > > > > --- > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.385 / Virus Database: 217 - Release Date: 9/5/2002 > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Sep 8 17:20:40 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id RAA31737; Sun, 8 Sep 2002 17:19:12 -0700 Resent-Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2002 17:19:12 -0700 Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2002 20:19:41 -0400 (EDT) From: John Schnurer To: Vortex , Schnurer Subject: http://www.dowlingmagnets.com/perm.htm MAGNET supplier Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Resent-Message-ID: <"clVkj1.0.pl7.0a-Uz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/47949 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Dear Vo., 50 cents each, 1-500 Not too bad. Your Magnetical Pal, JH From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Sep 8 21:32:36 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id VAA05321; Sun, 8 Sep 2002 21:31:20 -0700 Resent-Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2002 21:31:20 -0700 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/9.0.1.3108 Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2002 00:34:43 -0700 Subject: Tilley Device Update From: "Eugene F. Mallove" To: "vortex l eskimo.com" Message-ID: Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id VAA05292 Resent-Message-ID: <"X0294.0.2J1.NG2Vz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/47950 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Sunday evening, 9/8/02 -- Update on Carl Tilley's Device by Eugene F. Mallove (www.infinite-energy.com) "Free Energy" Car Suffers Mechanical Breakdown The potential record-breaking event by an electric vehicle at the Nashville SuperSpeedway this Saturday morning (9/7/02) disappointed Tennessee inventor Carl Tilley, his associates, and about a hundred other people attending the admission-free gathering, when a wheel bearing failed. See www.tilleyfoundation.com for the company's promotional material and information. The Tilley Foundation had rented the new SuperSpeedway for an expected all-day run to crush, with a margin of hundreds of miles, the world record for an EV of 220 miles. The group had rented the SuperSpeedway at a reported rental cost of about $5,000. Tilley claims to have invented a device that re-charges batteries on-the-fly in automobiles and in fixed installations, using no evident fuel or power source (except whatever energy may be accessible from the space vacuum). Photos of this device that are circulating show what looks like a very small electric motor with its output shaft penetrating an approximately one cubic foot metal box. Independent observers who have been to Tilley's lab say that this is the device that Tilley claims is also powering his building. Tilley's 1981 DeLorean, retrofit with a conventional electric motor and controller (purchased, we confirmed, from EV America of Wolfboro, New Hampshire), had to stop its planned multi-hundred mile demonstration after only about 18 miles of high speed driving (moving in the 70-90 mph range, estimated by observers). Its left rear wheel bearing failed, making the car inoperable for any more laps. An independent engineer from New York, who had driven to Nashville in HIS unconverted DeLorean, confirmed to the attendees that DeLorean vehicles are particularly prone to such bearing failures ‹ his own vehicle had had several such bearing failures in the past. Our colleague, engineer Jan Roos, who witnessed Saturday's demonstration relates that Tilley and his associates promise another public demonstration soon, which will involve TWO vehicles ‹ the DeLorean with new bearing replacements on all wheels, and a retrofit SUV of some kind. By doing this they hope to insure a successful demonstration. They have privately promised also a public demonstration of an electric-powered single-engine piloted aircraft, to be flown from Florida to somewhere in New England! Prior to the mechanical failure Saturday, the airplane flight was to have occurred before the end of October. Douglas Littlefield of Vermont, Tilley's spokesman, told me that they have obtained FAA approval for such a test flight. Jan Roos told me this evening that he inspected the vehicle as closely as possible, with the various compartments open, and there was no evidence of any kind of auxilliary batteries or another concealed engine. It is an electric vehicle, period. Two of the compact Tilley devices, with drive belts attached, appeared to be near the engine, Roos said. In the rush to start the early morning, all-day run on Saturday, Roos was not able to measure the initial 12, 12-Volt Wal-Mart battery pack voltage. However, the voltage reading immediately after the car stopped was 137 V, measured by Roos' DVM. The pack recovered to 144.8V within about 20 minutes after this. Chemical recovery of storage battery potential is a known phenomenon, of course. Tilley understands this, but noted to Roos that his device continues *some* of its recharge functioning after vehicle motor shut down. It is not clear what the average voltage of the battery pack would be during high-speed travel -- assuming the recharging claims are valid. Tilley and his associates claimed to Roos and others that the DeLorean had been driven 202 miles on a drive to Kentucky in the few weeks preceding the 9/7 public test, which if true would be remarkable. (The world record for a capable EV was by a Geo-Metro that went 220 miles.) Despite these dramatic claims, at this time it is not possible to draw conclusions about any anomalous performance of the vehicle. This must await further public demonstrations. It is noteworthy, however, that despite the embarrassing mechanical failure, there seemed to be no reluctance by the inventor and his business associates (many evidently from Vermont) to promise further demonstrations ‹ soon. This is a positive development. Prior to the 9/7/02 test, I had called Bob Batson, who runs EV America in Wolfboro, NH. I asked him how far a 3,000 lb De Lorean equipped with 12, 12-Volt (130-A-hr) batteries would be expected to travel, at say 60 mph, before stopping due to battery exhaustion. He ran his calculation and said that at 60 mph the car would travel at maximum 52 miles, but the average stopping distance would be 37 miles. This should put past and future claims by Carl Tilley and his associates in proper perspective. Roos said he learned that the Tilley Foundation's plan is to sell the rights to the technology as soon as possible. There have been many interested parties, it is said. One non-negotiable requirement, Roos learned, is that the purchasing entity must agree to put the technology into the marketplace within three years, or the rights revert back to the Tilley Foundation. Infinite Energy magazine will provide continuing coverage of efforts to validate or disprove, publicly and privately, the very large claims of Carl Tilley and his associates. In closing let me note the location of a few reports by others, before and after the Sept. 7th event: ****** http://www.greaterthings.com/news/tilley/press_releases/020908_demo_report.h tm AND http://www.tennessean.com/business/archives/02/09/22041880.shtml?Element_ID= 22041880 ****** Sincerely, Dr. Eugene F. Mallove Editor-in-Chief, Infinite Energy Magazine Director, New Energy Research Laboratory PO Box 2816 Concord, NH 03302-2816 editor infinite-energy.com www.infinite-energy.com Ph: 603-228-4516 Fx: 603-224-5975 From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Sep 9 08:07:33 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id IAA14626; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 08:05:43 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 08:05:43 -0700 Message-ID: <20020909150509.37007.qmail web40404.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 08:05:09 -0700 (PDT) From: Charles Ford Subject: Re: Tilley Device Update To: vortex-l eskimo.com In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Resent-Message-ID: <"nQSI-.0.Fa3.6ZBVz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/47951 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Gene; VO: None of This surprises me. Yes this type of failure (along with several others) are known bugs in the DeLorian design and likely the only reason that the 'homebrew' EV geeks haven't scooped them all up. Currently the favorite is a mid 80s Dodge Colt. At least they aren't screaming "Sabotage" and blaming it on the 'Men In Black' Geese like we all know the MIB have that flashy thing that makes you forget. :-) Anyway there is more. --- "Eugene F. Mallove" <editor infinite-energy.com> wrote: > I asked him how far a 3,000 lb De Lorean equipped with > 12, 12-Volt (130-A-hr) batteries would be expected to travel, at say 60 What is this rating? I remember "Ordinary car batteries" e-g Typical 60 AH. Secondary cell capacity is rated in AH 'Ampere Hours'. Car batteries are typically 60 AH. Other ratings would be the CCA (Cold Cranking Amps) Which a typical value would be like "650 CCA" What is "130-A-hr" If this is Ampere Hours then this is no ordinary car battery. The biggest thing you can buy off the shelf at Wall*Mart is 100 AH and is too big to fit in most cars. > mph, > before stopping due to battery exhaustion. He ran his calculation and > said > that at 60 mph the car would travel at maximum 52 miles, but the > average > stopping distance would be 37 miles. This should put past and future > claims > by Carl Tilley and his associates in proper perspective. calculated or real?.. Are we still talking about battery ratings? Concerning the calculations. In previous messages the (power consumption) numbers of this system where offered showing ~35HP This is much more then what is necessary to propel a MONSTROUS PICKUP TRUCK down the road at 60MPH. The DeLorain should require only 4 or 5 HP. With 12 60 AH batteries it should run for about ~10hr at 60mph giving the car a ~600 mi battery range. IF you consider the increase of battery performance offered by pulse charging the battery during use then you can see he will be proving nothing. by running the D all day at 120 We already know what it takes to get a car going down the road. Maybe if Tilly had asked someone about that before he started then he would not be offering that C&B fuel efficiency based calculation. Then again maybe he did?? Which would suggest inappropriate behavior > Roos said he learned that the Tilley Foundation's plan is to sell > the > rights to the technology as soon as possible. There have been many > interested parties, it is said. One non-negotiable requirement, Roos > learned, is that the purchasing entity must agree to put the technology > into > the marketplace within three years, or the rights revert back to the > Tilley > Foundation. ===== Charles Ford KC5-OWZ cjford1 yahoo.com cjford1 swbell.net __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes http://finance.yahoo.com From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Sep 9 08:09:18 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id IAA16288; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 08:08:07 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 08:08:07 -0700 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/9.0.1.3108 Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2002 11:12:17 -0700 Subject: Missing messages? From: "Eugene F. Mallove" To: "vortex l eskimo.com" Message-ID: Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"s8wXq3.0.L-3.NbBVz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/47952 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: I receive very few Vortex messages each day. 5 yesterday, and only one (my own posting on Tilley) so far today. This has been going on now for over a month. So, unless you guys are unbelievably quiet -- hard to imagine that! --something must be wrong in the vortex system. Gene Mallove From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Sep 9 08:17:52 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id IAA21712; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 08:16:47 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 08:16:47 -0700 Message-ID: <20020909151612.76048.qmail web40406.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 08:16:12 -0700 (PDT) From: Charles Ford Subject: Re: Missing messages? To: vortex-l eskimo.com In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Resent-Message-ID: <"-nDe32.0.YI5.TjBVz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/47953 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: --- "Eugene F. Mallove" wrote: > I receive very few Vortex messages each day. 5 yesterday, and only one > (my > own posting on Tilley) so far today. This has been going on now for > over a > month. So, unless you guys are unbelievably quiet -- hard to imagine > that! > --something must be wrong in the vortex system. > > Gene Mallove > I have noticed the same... But there doesn't seem to be any gapes in the threads. ===== Charles Ford KC5-OWZ cjford1 yahoo.com cjford1 swbell.net __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes http://finance.yahoo.com From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Sep 9 09:57:05 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id JAA11920; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 09:56:02 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 09:56:02 -0700 Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 17:55:50 +0100 From: Josef Karthauser To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Missing messages? Message-ID: <20020909165550.GB3587 genius.tao.org.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Josef Karthauser , vortex-l eskimo.com References: <20020909151612.76048.qmail@web40406.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0ntfKIWw70PvrIHh" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020909151612.76048.qmail web40406.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Resent-Message-ID: <"ashs5.0.4w2.XADVz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/47954 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: --0ntfKIWw70PvrIHh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 08:16:12AM -0700, Charles Ford wrote: >=20 > --- "Eugene F. Mallove" wrote: > > I receive very few Vortex messages each day. 5 yesterday, and only one > > (my > > own posting on Tilley) so far today. This has been going on now for > > over a > > month. So, unless you guys are unbelievably quiet -- hard to imagine > > that! > > --something must be wrong in the vortex system. > >=20 > > Gene Mallove > >=20 > I have noticed the same... >=20 > But there doesn't seem to be any gapes in the threads. >=20 Everyone's just quiet Eugene. I've not noticed any problems. Joe --=20 "As far as the laws of mathematics refer to reality, they are not certain; and as far as they are certain, they do not refer to reality." - Albert Einstein, 1921 --0ntfKIWw70PvrIHh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAj180pYACgkQXVIcjOaxUBbSbwCeKh4GPHAxdoEagzU4CQRdAgJL GRoAni4kzq1pGMjEbYjq2nfVVJ5fU/Ia =Cj/C -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0ntfKIWw70PvrIHh-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Sep 9 10:44:42 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id KAA05278; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 10:43:22 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 10:43:22 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 12:43:36 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: thomas malloy Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Resent-Message-ID: <"qJIme3.0.NI1.vsDVz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Unidentified subject! Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/47955 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Leon, my real estate broker, attended Saturday's demonstration of the E V Delorean. We talked this morning and he wanted to know what I knew about cold electricity. I told him that it was part of the mythos of F E. Various researchers among them Roger Hastings' observations on Newman's energy machine, and Floyd Sweet's reports of his research, have reported this phenomena. Hastings noted that the machine cooled off the room when it ran, and Sweet reported that this electricity made a light bulb glow, while it got cold. Sweet reported that this form of electricity was produced by the proper conditioning of the magnets. Sweet also observed that being near to cold electricity made him tired, as though this form of energy pulls the life force out of you, which would make it something that would be best avoided. The webmaster of the Adams motor website http://www.geocities.com/theadamsmotor/cdmotor.html claims that when the motor he has pictured on his website is properly constructed, the MOSFET transistor gets cold. That is the primary reason that I promised the MN Tesla Society t hat I would build one. This letter is being sent out to various people who are interested in F E research to ask if any of you have a reproducable way to generate cold electricity? From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Sep 9 11:42:33 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id LAA08639; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 11:41:02 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 11:41:02 -0700 Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2002 11:39:31 -0700 From: Jones Beene Subject: Re: Unidentified subject! To: vortex-l eskimo.com Message-id: <003d01c25830$3d15ab60$0a016ea8 cpq> MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-priority: Normal References: Resent-Message-ID: <"jFKi71.0.v62.ziEVz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/47956 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: From: "thomas malloy" > This letter is being sent out to various people who are interested in > F E research to ask if any of you have a reproducable way to generate > cold electricity? This fellow, Chris Arnold, who was on this forum for a while until several observers asked for clarification or expressed justifiable questions about some aspects of his results (including the claimed drop in temp) - and he mistook anything less than immediate adulation to be either derogatory remarks and/or just a case of somebody trying to steal his idea, and left in a hufff - anyway he claimed his device was a "cold current" kind of thing... ...in the Joe Newman "sparking commutator" tradition, of course not that there's anything wrong with that... unless you're an investor... http://members.aol.com/hypercom59/index.html?mtbrand=AOL_US From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Sep 9 13:52:54 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id NAA30554; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 13:51:50 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 13:51:50 -0700 Message-ID: <20020909205116.50756.qmail web40405.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 13:51:16 -0700 (PDT) From: Charles Ford Subject: Re: Unidentified subject! To: vortex-l eskimo.com In-Reply-To: <003d01c25830$3d15ab60$0a016ea8 cpq> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Resent-Message-ID: <"s0Iek3.0.KT7.bdGVz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/47957 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Chris has a link on his page mailto:hypercom59 aol.com AOL is still allowing access so it is likely that he is still using that address. Actually I never noticed him making an accociation to "cold electricity" only that there was a cooling effect. --- Jones Beene wrote: > From: "thomas malloy" > > > This letter is being sent out to various people who are interested in > > F E research to ask if any of you have a reproducable way to generate > > cold electricity? > > > This fellow, Chris Arnold, who was on this forum for a while until > several > observers asked for clarification or expressed justifiable questions > about some > aspects of his results (including the claimed drop in temp) - and he > mistook > anything less than immediate adulation to be either derogatory remarks > and/or > just a case of somebody trying to steal his idea, and left in a hufff - > anyway > he claimed his device was a "cold current" kind of thing... > > ...in the Joe Newman "sparking commutator" tradition, of course > > not that there's anything wrong with that... > > unless you're an investor... > > > http://members.aol.com/hypercom59/index.html?mtbrand=AOL_US > ===== Charles Ford KC5-OWZ cjford1 yahoo.com cjford1 swbell.net __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes http://finance.yahoo.com From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Sep 9 16:18:40 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id QAA18943; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 16:17:15 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 16:17:15 -0700 From: Dean Miller To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Missing messages? Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2002 18:18:25 -0500 Organization: Miller and Associates Message-ID: <81bqnukt0o1pvcvkfpja4kvhahq74eccu4 4ax.com> References: In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.91/32.564 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id QAA18892 Resent-Message-ID: <"kDWWl3.0.md4.wlIVz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/47958 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: On Mon, 09 Sep 2002 11:12:17 -0700, "Eugene F. Mallove" wrote: >I receive very few Vortex messages each day. 5 yesterday, and only one (my >own posting on Tilley) so far today. This has been going on now for over a >month. So, unless you guys are unbelievably quiet -- hard to imagine that! >--something must be wrong in the vortex system. It's summertime, summertime, sum ... sum... summertime. -- Dean -- from (almost) Des Moines -- KB0ZDF From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Sep 9 17:29:43 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id RAA23951; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 17:28:28 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 17:28:28 -0700 Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 20:28:57 -0400 (EDT) From: John Schnurer To: Vortex cc: Schnurer Subject: Re: "cold electricity." Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/ALTERNATIVE; BOUNDARY="Boundary_(ID_d6W9fVuJssR9J7B5yeh6RA)" Content-ID: Resent-Message-ID: <"UTvhR.0.8s5.goJVz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/47959 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. Send mail to mime docserver.cac.washington.edu for more info. --Boundary_(ID_d6W9fVuJssR9J7B5yeh6RA) Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=us-ascii Content-ID: > > > Can you please point me to any reasonably complete text on what > cold electricity is? > By this I mean an explanation in commonly understood terms. > > Thanks, > PLEASE J Can anyone paraphrase cold electricity in a no word salad definition? --Boundary_(ID_d6W9fVuJssR9J7B5yeh6RA)-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Sep 9 22:39:50 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx2.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id WAA16031; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 22:38:32 -0700 (PDT) Resent-Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 22:38:32 -0700 (PDT) From: Robin van Spaandonk To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Tilley Device Update Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 13:32:36 +1000 Organization: Improving Message-ID: References: <20020909150509.37007.qmail@web40404.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20020909150509.37007.qmail web40404.mail.yahoo.com> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.92/32.572 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx2.eskimo.com id WAA15989 Resent-Message-ID: <"14JL42.0.Pw3.MLOVz" mx2> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/47960 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: In reply to Charles Ford's message of Mon, 9 Sep 2002 08:05:09 -0700: Hi, [snip] >The DeLorain should require only 4 or 5 HP. With 12 60 AH batteries it >should run for about ~10hr at 60mph giving the car a ~600 mi battery >range. [snip] Using these numbers, and based on only 4 HP, and assuming a constant battery voltage of 14 V, I get 202 miles. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ Competition provides the motivation, Cooperation provides the means. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Sep 9 23:29:27 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id XAA23969; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 23:22:21 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 23:22:21 -0700 From: Robin van Spaandonk To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: "cold electricity." Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 13:41:04 +1000 Organization: Improving Message-ID: <6bqqnu4hira2f5kmb10o5lqlpc5qbmsbt7 4ax.com> References: In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.92/32.572 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id XAA23924 Resent-Message-ID: <"BdpF_.0.Rs5.S-OVz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/47961 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: In reply to John Schnurer's message of Mon, 9 Sep 2002 20:28:57 -0400: Hi, [snip] > Can anyone paraphrase cold electricity in a no word salad >definition? Unfortunately not. At least not that I have ever found. Probably because if it exists at all, no one understands what it really is. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ Competition provides the motivation, Cooperation provides the means. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Sep 10 01:16:18 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id BAA09990; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 01:15:35 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 01:15:35 -0700 Message-ID: <003c01c258a2$3ccb5520$959dcbc1 pc> From: "Noel Whitney" To: References: <6bqqnu4hira2f5kmb10o5lqlpc5qbmsbt7@4ax.com> Subject: Re: "cold electricity." Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 09:15:33 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 Resent-Message-ID: <"BzLBG2.0.xR2.deQVz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/47962 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Robin - Interesting to see this one raise its head again , If my memory is Ok ( And some say its far from Ok!) there was some mention of this in respect of the Bedini Device of years ago ( Whatever happened to that ?). It was in connection to "When the unit was working a reduction in temperature was noted in the wiring", and it was referred to as negative elec.It appears it would drive some types of load but not others like convention elec. Greetings to all our American friends from Ireland and we think of you all on 9/11 ----- Original Message ----- From: Robin van Spaandonk To: Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 4:41 AM Subject: Re: "cold electricity." > In reply to John Schnurer's message of Mon, 9 Sep 2002 20:28:57 -0400: > Hi, > [snip] > > Can anyone paraphrase cold electricity in a no word salad > >definition? > Unfortunately not. At least not that I have ever found. Probably because if it exists at all, no one understands what it really is. > > > Regards, > > Robin van Spaandonk > > http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ > > Competition provides the motivation, > Cooperation provides the means. > > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Sep 10 02:26:17 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id CAA02003; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 02:24:07 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 02:24:07 -0700 Subject: Re: "cold electricity." To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hamdix verisoft.com.tr Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 13:23:43 +0400 Message-ID: Resent-Message-ID: <"Prl41.0.0V.qeRVz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/47963 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Dear John, I recall somewhere it is reported that in a specific experiment, experimenter had a cold feeling when a current passed trough his finger/hand. An other association with "cold electricity" could be made by again in a specific experiment it is observed an electric discharge between electrodes in air having slightly different color than it should be. May these experiments have a connection with theories of Tom Bearden. Anyway, searching Google with "cold electicity" gave 1300 hits, some of them are definetly worth to reading. For eample section of http://www.nuenergy.org/Proceedings2001.htm: What is "cold electricity"? There is one last subject that I would like to address before I begin my demonstrations and public tests here today. It is the interpretation of what is being called "cold electricity." It just frustrates me to no end when I hear theories out there that have no scientific basis to them. How on Earth can electricity be cold? Electricity is a flow of charge. It is not a thermal state. Are we talking about a wire that loses thermal energy as a secondary effect due to the passage of electrical current? If so, this is nothing new nor is it strange. Have you ever heard about electrostatic cooling? A United States patent was granted to a fellow named Oscar C. Blomgren Sr. If anyone is interested, the U.S. Patent number is 3,872,917. This patent utilizes the principle of electrostatic cooling. It makes use of high-voltage negatively charged probes that are placed near the hot object, which is grounded. This extremely simple system uses very low power and is very efficient. This invention could also be used to remove thermal energy from a wire. It works because negative air ions carry the heat away with them and are dumped into the ground. It should not be too difficult to design a unit that could chill electrical wires to the point where a frost would appear. What has just been described is a solid state electrostatic heat pump. There is no mystery here and certainly there is no new science involved. Anyway, I have put in my two cents worth and I will not ramble on any further. People must believe what they must, onto the best part of my lecture, the hardware. _BAP John Schnurer wrote: > > > > > > > Can you please point me to any reasonably complete text on what > > cold electricity is? > > By this I mean an explanation in commonly understood terms. > > > > Thanks, > > > PLEASE J > Can anyone paraphrase cold electricity in a no word salad > definition? Regards, hamdix From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Sep 10 03:51:36 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id DAA00378; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 03:50:58 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 03:50:58 -0700 Subject: Re: "cold electricity." To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hamdix verisoft.com.tr Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 14:50:26 +0400 Message-ID: Resent-Message-ID: <"dEhL52.0.s4.7wSVz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/47964 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Dear John, This is again from google search: http://www.mypage.bluewin.ch/Bizarre/EVs.htm CLASSICALLY BOUND ELECTRONS EVs, Exotic Chemistry & ‘Cold Electricity’ C.P. Kouropoulos Abstract At a range of 10-13 m, the magnetic field of a classical point-like spinning electron reaches 1 GTesla, which can overcome the electrostatic repulsion of another electron. This permits them to pair into singlet states, dense electronic stringy loops as well as induce an exotic chemistry and nuclear reactions. The resulting electronic strings may shrink, convert a fraction of their mass into ionizing radiation, and thereby generate electrical power by the photoelectric effect. The resulting shrunk state, upon entering an anode, may use the latter’s electronic thermal energy to convert itself again into free electrons, creating the effect of ‘cold electricity’. A similar process could well be occurring inside conductors. More realistic, fully relativistic semi-classical evaluations are given in the appendix. Full text with figures follows. hamdix From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Sep 10 06:56:40 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx2.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id GAA23181; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 06:53:17 -0700 (PDT) Resent-Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 06:53:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Sent: 10 Sep 2002 13:53:01 GMT Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20020910094854.02b64fe0 mail.DIRECTVInternet.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell mail.DIRECTVInternet.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 09:52:53 -0400 To: vortex-L eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: Re: Tilley Device Update Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <"9Npk_2.0.1g5.7bVVz" mx2> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/47966 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Ah, vortex is *not* rejecting messages today. It was yesterday. But I think the fall-off in traffic is unrelated. I was hoping that more people would read and comment on the papers we are posting on LENR.org. Anyway, Eugene F. Mallove wrote: >Tilley's 1981 DeLorean, retrofit with a conventional electric motor and >controller (purchased, we confirmed, from EV America of Wolfboro, New >Hampshire), had to stop its planned multi-hundred mile demonstration after >only about 18 miles of high speed driving (moving in the 70-90 mph range, >estimated by observers). Its left rear wheel bearing failed, making the >car inoperable for any more laps. This is frustrating. Perhaps I am missing something . . . but why didn't they jack up the car, turn on the engine, and let it run for several hours more? The DeLorean is a rear engine, rear wheel drive, but I presume it has a standard shift or it can be disengaged from the wheels somehow. They could have tested the battery charge after several hours of running in neutral. People came from out of town at great expense and inconvenience. A valid test could have been performed. >They have privately promised also a public demonstration of an >electric-powered single-engine piloted aircraft, to be flown from Florida >to somewhere in New England! Prior to the mechanical failure Saturday, the >airplane flight was to have occurred before the end of October. Douglas >Littlefield of Vermont, Tilley's spokesman, told me that they have >obtained FAA approval for such a test flight. If so, the FAA has gone off its rocker. Frankly, I do not believe this report. Novel engine and airframe configurations have to be flight tested for years over unpopulated areas before they are certified for flights over cities into ordinary airports. Even an incremental improvement like the Cirrus required years and tens of millions of dollars to certify, and a technical problem with one of the prototypes killed a skilled test pilot. Home-built kit airplanes do not require certification, but they are not equipped with revolutionary new and untested engine types. Some people might criticize the FAA rules. I live under the second busiest airport approach in Georgia. I have seen the wreckage of a fatal crash, and neighbors have seen three others, one of them in his driveway. I think that allowing an aircraft with revolutionary new engine to fly over a populated area would be grossly irresponsible. Frankly, I think it would be idiotic for anyone to fly such an airplane. Why are people risking their lives to prove a point that can be proved far more easily at no risk to anyone? No one should fly or drive any vehicle with this motor, or operate any equipment powered by it, until thousands of production prototype motors have been subjected to millions of hours of performance testing in major engineering labs. This is not 1820. We do not need people risking their lives to test prototype motors anymore. This is real life, not a movie. >Jan Roos told me this evening that he inspected the vehicle as closely as >possible, with the various compartments open, and there was no evidence >of any kind of auxilliary batteries or another concealed engine. That's good, but I doubt it will convince many people. Tilley could convince the world easily by other means, at less expense. It is shame he pursues these "public demonstration" methods. Lone inventors often act this way. If he continues to rely on these demonstrations I think there is little chance he will convince the public and commercialize the vehicle (assuming it is real). This method is better than publishing technical papers in obscure journals, but still not good enough. - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Sep 10 08:31:09 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx2.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id IAA11867; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 08:29:41 -0700 (PDT) Resent-Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 08:29:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20020910152848.97793.qmail web40405.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 08:28:48 -0700 (PDT) From: Charles Ford Subject: Re: Tilley Device Update To: vortex-l eskimo.com In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Resent-Message-ID: <"tDxk-.0.Kv2.Y_WVz" mx2> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/47967 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Yes... I realized my boo-boo (as usual) too late to fix it. :-) --- Robin van Spaandonk wrote: > In reply to Charles Ford's message of Mon, 9 Sep 2002 08:05:09 -0700: > Hi, > [snip] > >The DeLorain should require only 4 or 5 HP. With 12 60 AH batteries > it > >should run for about ~10hr at 60mph giving the car a ~600 mi battery > >range. > [snip] > Using these numbers, and based on only 4 HP, and assuming a constant > battery voltage of 14 V, I get 202 miles. > > > Regards, > > Robin van Spaandonk > > http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ > > Competition provides the motivation, > Cooperation provides the means. > ===== Charles Ford KC5-OWZ cjford1 yahoo.com cjford1 swbell.net __________________________________________________ Yahoo! - We Remember 9-11: A tribute to the more than 3,000 lives lost http://dir.remember.yahoo.com/tribute From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Sep 10 09:12:38 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id JAA23462; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 09:10:55 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 09:10:55 -0700 Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 09:09:18 -0700 From: Jones Beene Subject: Re: "cold electricity." To: vortex-l eskimo.com Message-id: <005a01c258e4$6abdb300$0a016ea8 cpq> MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-priority: Normal References: Resent-Message-ID: <"VGh4l.0.Sk5.FcXVz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/47968 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: From: > http://www.mypage.bluewin.ch/Bizarre/EVs.htm > CLASSICALLY BOUND ELECTRONS > EVs, Exotic Chemistry & 'Cold Electricity' C.P. Kouropoulos This is a good reference. I think "cold electricity" is another way of looking at, or describing Ken Shoulders' amazing work with EVs, aka "charge clusters." Ken was/is twenty years ahead of the rest of electrical engineering with his remarkable insight and sophisticated level of experimentation. Regards, Jones From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Sep 10 09:14:58 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id JAA24248; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 09:13:13 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 09:13:13 -0700 Message-ID: <20020910154023.205.qmail web40405.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 08:40:23 -0700 (PDT) From: Charles Ford Subject: Re: "cold electricity." To: vortex-l eskimo.com In-Reply-To: <6bqqnu4hira2f5kmb10o5lqlpc5qbmsbt7 4ax.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Resent-Message-ID: <"hWkcC1.0.kw5.OeXVz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/47969 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: More likely a misunerstanding by the researcher. There are many cases for parts and wires to cool in ordianary oporation due to Seeback and Peltier efficts --- Robin van Spaandonk wrote: > In reply to John Schnurer's message of Mon, 9 Sep 2002 20:28:57 -0400: > Hi, > [snip] > > Can anyone paraphrase cold electricity in a no word salad > >definition? > Unfortunately not. At least not that I have ever found. Probably > because if it exists at all, no one understands what it really is. > > > Regards, > > Robin van Spaandonk > > http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ > > Competition provides the motivation, > Cooperation provides the means. > ===== Charles Ford KC5-OWZ cjford1 yahoo.com cjford1 swbell.net __________________________________________________ Yahoo! - We Remember 9-11: A tribute to the more than 3,000 lives lost http://dir.remember.yahoo.com/tribute From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Sep 10 09:39:22 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id JAA05447; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 09:38:29 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 09:38:29 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 11:38:46 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: thomas malloy Subject: Re: "cold electricity." Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Resent-Message-ID: <"oNQYK1.0.0L1.50YVz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/47970 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: >John Schuner wrote; > > Can you please point me to any reasonably complete text on what >> cold electricity is? >> By this I mean an explanation in commonly understood terms. >> >> Thanks, >> > PLEASE J > Can anyone paraphrase cold electricity in a no word salad >definition? No, but I can attempt it in one paragraph. In a conversation that Mr. Tilley had with an engineer he explains why he reduced the size of the wire which carries current from his Black Box to the battery which power the DeLorean automobile he modified to run on an electric motor. He is heard saying that the smaller wire works better, because it allows less current to go through. Any electrical engineer will tell you that in working with conventional electrical energy, the system never works better with a smaller wire. Clearly, the Tilley Machine is not working with conventional electricity. This story reminds me of a conversation that I had with the late Otto Schmitt, professor emeritus of physics at the University of Minnesota. Lord Raleigh was visiting Nicola Tesla's laboratory. After looking over the machinery he commented that what he ( Tesla ) was doing was not possible with conventional electricity, to which Tesla replied, "I'm not using Hertzian ( conventional electricity ) waves." Otto suddenly got interested and said, "he's talking about nonorthogonal waves. " Otto then told me how as a graduate student he had taken an honors course in general relativity were they discussed these waves. In later conversations he agreed that he had, "no idea how to generate, control, or even detect these waves." For years I have been compiling what I term the mythos of free energy machines. It includes the following. electrical machines that have a higher out put than input, get cold when they run, electrical waves that can pass through a Faraday shield, which shields out conventional waves, waves which effect gravity. BTW, Otto often expressed his belief that it was possible to generate the "electrodynamic equivalent of the tsunami wave." Later Jones Beene posted This fellow, Chris Arnold, who was on this forum for a while until several observers asked for clarification or expressed justifiable questions about some aspects of his results (including the claimed drop in temp) - and he mistook anything less than immediate adulation to be either derogatory remarks and/or just a case of somebody trying to steal his idea, and left in a hufff - anyway he claimed his device was a "cold current" kind of thing... ...in the Joe Newman "sparking commutator" tradition, of course not that there's anything wrong with that... unless you're an investor... Good point Jones, the Arnold reactor involved a spinning magnetic field. I miss Chris, brilliant inventor, too bad he had such a case of invertoritus. Dale Pond of SVPVRIL posted One of the old Keely stories relates how the room got very cold when he started one of his engines. Russell relates how "charging" electricity is actually cold while discharging electricity is hot.... Leon likes what he has seen of Russell's work and just ordered Tim Binder's book. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Sep 10 23:58:14 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id XAA29344; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 23:57:12 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 23:57:12 -0700 From: Robin van Spaandonk To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: "cold electricity." Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 16:56:36 +1000 Organization: Improving Message-ID: <08qtnu4mmn5h3rphums08ei9t6bcf9ovi9 4ax.com> References: In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.92/32.572 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id XAA29318 Resent-Message-ID: <"E2ig43.0.QA7.7bkVz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/47971 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: In reply to thomas malloy's message of Tue, 10 Sep 2002 11:38:46 -0500: Hi, [snip] >BTW, Otto often expressed his belief that it was possible to generate >the "electrodynamic equivalent of the tsunami wave." [snip This would be a soliton wave. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ Competition provides the motivation, Cooperation provides the means. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Sep 11 10:45:10 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id KAA06719; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 10:43:33 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 10:43:33 -0700 Reply-To: From: "Keith Nagel" To: "Vortex" Subject: Off Topic: Buzz Aldrin Kicking Ass, taking names... Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 13:58:14 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Importance: Normal X-Rcpt-To: Resent-Message-ID: <"QvDKL3.0.ee1.43uVz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/47972 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Thought you all could use a chuckle today... http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&u=/nm/20020910/people_nm/people _aldrin_dc&e=1 I think this is what Tom Wolfe referred to as "The Right Stuff". Does that answer your question, Bart? K. BEVERLY HILLS, Calif. (Reuters) - A man who publicly confronted astronaut Edwin "Buzz" Aldrin over whether he actually went to the Moon said on Tuesday that the Apollo 11 hero almost sent him into space with a punch to the jaw. Bart Sibrel, an independent filmmaker from Nashville, Tennessee, said he was trying to conduct an ambush interview with Aldrin outside a hotel in Beverly Hills on Monday when the astronaut punched him and ran away. "I approached him and asked him again to swear on a Bible that he went to the moon, and told him he was a thief for taking money to give an interview for something he didn't do," Sibrel told Reuters. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Sep 11 11:01:18 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id KAA15487; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 10:59:13 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 10:59:13 -0700 Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 10:57:32 -0700 From: Jones Beene Subject: Has ET arrived? To: vortex Message-id: <002b01c259bc$b45fdbe0$0a016ea8 cpq> MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0028_01C25982.07A57660" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-priority: Normal Resent-Message-ID: <"Odl491.0.tn3.nHuVz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/47973 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0028_01C25982.07A57660 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Maybe this is what's got Buzz a little bit on edge lately... For the past several months, at least, an extra-terrestrial vehicle of = some kind has been mysteriously "parked" in earth orbit. Officials at NASA are hesitant, so far, to call it anything but "space = trash" since it appears to be a manufactured object rather than an = asteroid...and they have been successful, till now, in keeping the whole = episode hushed up, but "space trash"....riiiiight... Other possibilities: 1) A secret Russian (Chinese, etc) observation platform.. BUT we would have noticed it going up 2) An observation drone from another civilization BUT why would they risk getting so close to us without contact 3) An occupied spacecraft from another civilization, intent on making = contact BUT what are they waiting on?=20 Don't they realize that Bush might nuke first and ask questions = later 4)The "Heaven's Gate" crew may have jumped the gun by a few years... Check it out at: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/2251386.stm ------=_NextPart_000_0028_01C25982.07A57660 Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Maybe this is what's got Buzz a little bit on edge lately...
 
For the past several months, at least, an extra-terrestrial vehicle = of some=20 kind has been mysteriously "parked" in earth orbit.
 
Officials at NASA are hesitant, so far, to call it = anything but=20 "space trash" since it appears to be a manufactured object rather than = an=20 asteroid...and they have been successful, till now, in keeping the whole = episode=20 hushed up, but "space trash"....riiiiight...
 
Other possibilities:
1) A secret Russian (Chinese, etc) observation platform..
    BUT we would have noticed it going up
2) An observation drone from another civilization
    BUT why would they risk getting so close to us = without=20 contact
3) An occupied spacecraft from another civilization, intent on = making=20 contact
    BUT what are they waiting on?
    Don't they realize that Bush might nuke first = and ask=20 questions later
4)The "Heaven's Gate" crew may have jumped the gun by a few = years...
 
 
Check it out at:
http://new= s.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/2251386.stm
------=_NextPart_000_0028_01C25982.07A57660-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Sep 11 13:24:02 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id NAA31367; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 13:23:09 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 13:23:09 -0700 Message-ID: <00b801c259e9$ca564a60$e257ccd1 asus> From: "Mike Carrell" To: References: <002b01c259bc$b45fdbe0$0a016ea8 cpq> Subject: Re: Has ET arrived? Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 14:57:36 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00A6_01C259A3.90BAD5A0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Resent-Message-ID: <"LlJQy2.0.yf7.jOwVz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/47974 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_00A6_01C259A3.90BAD5A0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable The BBC report says the object is in a 50 day orbit -- that's past the = moon. Nobody on Earth has the capability to loft a missile that far. It, = or They, are safe. Mike Carrell ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Jones Beene=20 To: vortex=20 Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 10:57 AM Subject: Has ET arrived? Maybe this is what's got Buzz a little bit on edge lately... For the past several months, at least, an extra-terrestrial vehicle of = some kind has been mysteriously "parked" in earth orbit. Officials at NASA are hesitant, so far, to call it anything but "space = trash" since it appears to be a manufactured object rather than an = asteroid...and they have been successful, till now, in keeping the whole = episode hushed up, but "space trash"....riiiiight... Other possibilities: 1) A secret Russian (Chinese, etc) observation platform.. BUT we would have noticed it going up 2) An observation drone from another civilization BUT why would they risk getting so close to us without contact 3) An occupied spacecraft from another civilization, intent on making = contact BUT what are they waiting on?=20 Don't they realize that Bush might nuke first and ask questions = later 4)The "Heaven's Gate" crew may have jumped the gun by a few years... Check it out at: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/2251386.stm ------=_NextPart_000_00A6_01C259A3.90BAD5A0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
The BBC report says the object is in = a 50 day=20 orbit -- that's past the moon. Nobody on Earth has the capability to = loft a=20 missile that far. It, or They, are safe.
Mike Carrell
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Jones Beene=20
To: vortex
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, = 2002 10:57=20 AM
Subject: Has ET arrived?

Maybe this is what's got Buzz a little bit on edge = lately...
 
For the past several months, at least, an extra-terrestrial = vehicle of=20 some kind has been mysteriously "parked" in earth orbit.
 
Officials at NASA are hesitant, so far, to call it = anything but=20 "space trash" since it appears to be a manufactured object rather than = an=20 asteroid...and they have been successful, till now, in keeping the = whole=20 episode hushed up, but "space trash"....riiiiight...
 
Other possibilities:
1) A secret Russian (Chinese, etc) observation platform..
    BUT we would have noticed it going up
2) An observation drone from another civilization
    BUT why would they risk getting so close to us = without=20 contact
3) An occupied spacecraft from another civilization, intent = on=20 making contact
    BUT what are they waiting on?
    Don't they realize that Bush might nuke first = and ask=20 questions later
4)The "Heaven's Gate" crew may have jumped the gun by a few=20 years...
 
 
Check it out at:
http://new= s.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/2251386.stm
= ------=_NextPart_000_00A6_01C259A3.90BAD5A0-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Sep 11 13:55:36 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id NAA16204; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 13:54:09 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 13:54:09 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: rick mail.highsurf.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <002b01c259bc$b45fdbe0$0a016ea8 cpq> References: <002b01c259bc$b45fdbe0$0a016ea8 cpq> Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 10:53:04 -1000 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Rick Monteverde Subject: Increase your penis size (NOT SPAM!) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Resent-Message-ID: <"R03pn1.0.5z3.nrwVz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/47975 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: May be off topic, but gotta love that New Scientist web site - http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99992781 Now if they can only learn how to do that with nerve tissue. - Rick Monteverde, Honolulu Hawaii From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Sep 11 15:30:46 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id PAA06229; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 15:29:50 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 15:29:50 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: rick mail.highsurf.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <002b01c259bc$b45fdbe0$0a016ea8 cpq> References: <002b01c259bc$b45fdbe0$0a016ea8 cpq> Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 12:28:14 -1000 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Rick Monteverde Subject: Re: Has ET arrived? Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id PAA06164 Resent-Message-ID: <"WFCCn1.0.FX1.TFyVz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/47976 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Don't we/they have some snoop sats floating around in weird high orbits that have something to do with elint? Probably one of those, not that anyone's going to admit it. I've heard these pop up sometimes when SETI gets false positives that pass initial LEO/GEO/Planetary-Mission filters. RE 1) below: probably noticed, not gonna say anything. ** I didn't know we DID have a second natural moon. I can't pronounce the name though. Anybody? ** BTW, for a little piece of genuine ET-something, try eBay. You can't be a true nerd unless you have a meteorite, right? The other day I got a very nice cut/polished piece of chondrite with metals and stuff showing for about $10. Real carbonaceous one cost lots more, usually. For more on interesting stuff in meteorites, see: http://www.panspermia.org/index.htm - Rick Monteverde, Honolulu Hawaii >Maybe this is what's got Buzz a little bit on edge lately... > >For the past several months, at least, an extra-terrestrial vehicle of some kind has been mysteriously "parked" in earth orbit. > >Officials at NASA are hesitant, so far, to call it anything but "space trash" since it appears to be a manufactured object rather than an asteroid...and they have been successful, till now, in keeping the whole episode hushed up, but "space trash"....riiiiight... > >Other possibilities: >1) A secret Russian (Chinese, etc) observation platform.. > BUT we would have noticed it going up >2) An observation drone from another civilization > BUT why would they risk getting so close to us without contact >3) An occupied spacecraft from another civilization, intent on making contact > BUT what are they waiting on? > Don't they realize that Bush might nuke first and ask questions later >4)The "Heaven's Gate" crew may have jumped the gun by a few years... > > >Check it out at: >http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/2251386.stm From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Sep 12 00:04:52 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id AAA20305; Thu, 12 Sep 2002 00:02:57 -0700 Resent-Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 00:02:57 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <08qtnu4mmn5h3rphums08ei9t6bcf9ovi9 4ax.com> References: <08qtnu4mmn5h3rphums08ei9t6bcf9ovi9 4ax.com> Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 02:03:06 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: thomas malloy Subject: Re: "cold electricity." Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Resent-Message-ID: <"Sr_7I3.0.Bz4.Xm3Wz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/47977 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: >Robin van Spaandonk posted; >[snip >This would be a soliton wave. > So Robin; Do you know of a way to generate the electrodynamic equivalent of the soliton wave? Now that I think of it, I saw a webpage in which the webmaster had photographed his swimming pool in sunlight. There were bright spots in it. This concentration of light was the result of solitons. Leon and I want to thank all of you who contributed to this thread. I am reading USP# 3,872,917 When I first looked over the drawings, I was reminded of Ken Sholder's patents. However I have yet to see anything about the electrical energy or clusters of electrons doing the cooling, it seems to me that the electrical flow contributes to the more efficient transfer of heat. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Sep 12 06:56:48 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id GAA21074; Thu, 12 Sep 2002 06:55:49 -0700 Resent-Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 06:55:49 -0700 X-Sent: 12 Sep 2002 13:55:45 GMT Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20020912095230.02bfc8a0 mail.DIRECTVInternet.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell mail.DIRECTVInternet.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 09:55:37 -0400 To: vortex-L eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: Brian Clarke dead Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <"a8Dsq1.0.895.bp9Wz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/47978 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Brian Clarke died recently. He coauthored papers by McKubre. He was intemperate and he also wrote papers and letters criticizing McKubre. - Jed - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [A message passed from Dieter Britz] With deepest and sincere regrets, I have to inform you that Brian Clarke, Professor Emeritus of Physics & Astronomy, McMaster University, died of a heart attack on Tuesday, September 3rd while visiting his son in California. A memorial service will be arranged at a later date. For further communique you may contact Mara Esposto, Administrative Coordinator, at esposto mcmaster.ca Kenrick Chin Research Technician Physics & Astronomy McMaster University Hamilton, Ontario, Canada From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Sep 12 07:13:11 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id HAA28848; Thu, 12 Sep 2002 07:12:33 -0700 Resent-Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 07:12:33 -0700 Message-ID: <20020912141159.94386.qmail web40408.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 07:11:59 -0700 (PDT) From: Charles Ford Subject: Re: Has ET arrived? To: vortex-l eskimo.com In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Resent-Message-ID: <"oi6OL3.0.c27.G3AWz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/47979 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Nerd humor. Hmm... I was thinking. Its Abraham's two angels looking for TEN RIGHTEOUS MEN!... ... .........still ........... ... BzzFap-zeeee! thud tick tick tick K A A mfn B O O M game over Anyway. If its ET then he is trying to decide exactly which pack of savage barbarians to contact. You know. The peaceful ones. ... and ..... Still looking.. Hmm You can't seem to find the thing any more? They must have gave up Really though if its a rock then it belongs to us. We should send up a robot probe to analyze it. Maybe take a core sample (Then ET will take notice) You know shove a hollow tube through it and pull the insides out. Then incinerate the contents of the tube to look for life. Isn't that the way its done? Gee if its the right size and made of -->The Right Stuff<-- we might hollow it out and make it into a craft of our own. OR maybe it is ET extending a welcoming hand. Sort of like Sagan's "Contact". Ya know... Come take a ride with us... Or Its the hand of God 'fixin ta' slap us all silly... Really I must go.. Work is piling up on my bench. I must spend the day soldering under a microscope. (actually its a tiny pile). --- Rick Monteverde wrote: > Don't we/they have some snoop sats floating around in weird high orbits > that have something to do with elint? Probably one of those, not that > anyone's going to admit it. I've heard these pop up sometimes when SETI > gets false positives that pass initial LEO/GEO/Planetary-Mission > filters. > > RE 1) below: probably noticed, not gonna say anything. > > ** I didn't know we DID have a second natural moon. I can't pronounce > the name though. Anybody? > > ** BTW, for a little piece of genuine ET-something, try eBay. You can't > be a true nerd unless you have a meteorite, right? The other day I got > a very nice cut/polished piece of chondrite with metals and stuff > showing for about $10. Real carbonaceous one cost lots more, usually. > For more on interesting stuff in meteorites, see: > > http://www.panspermia.org/index.htm > > - Rick Monteverde, > Honolulu Hawaii > > > >Maybe this is what's got Buzz a little bit on edge lately... > > > >For the past several months, at least, an extra-terrestrial vehicle of > some kind has been mysteriously "parked" in earth orbit. > > > >Officials at NASA are hesitant, so far, to call it anything but "space > trash" since it appears to be a manufactured object rather than an > asteroid...and they have been successful, till now, in keeping the > whole episode hushed up, but "space trash"....riiiiight... > > > >Other possibilities: > >1) A secret Russian (Chinese, etc) observation platform.. > > BUT we would have noticed it going up > >2) An observation drone from another civilization > > BUT why would they risk getting so close to us without contact > >3) An occupied spacecraft from another civilization, intent on making > contact > > BUT what are they waiting on? > > Don't they realize that Bush might nuke first and ask questions > later > >4)The "Heaven's Gate" crew may have jumped the gun by a few years... > > > > > >Check it out at: > >http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/2251386.stm > > ===== Charles Ford KC5-OWZ cjford1 yahoo.com cjford1 swbell.net __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! News - Today's headlines http://news.yahoo.com From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Sep 12 13:01:59 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id NAA25863; Thu, 12 Sep 2002 13:00:39 -0700 Resent-Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 13:00:39 -0700 X-Sent: 12 Sep 2002 20:00:32 GMT Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20020912155409.02bfc8a0 mail.DIRECTVInternet.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell mail.DIRECTVInternet.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 16:00:18 -0400 To: vortex-L eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: Uploaded five "Accountability" papers Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <"z0zvv2.0.1K6.d9FWz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/47980 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: I uploaded five papers from "Accountability in Research," 2000. 8. Three more to go. Direct links to the first five are here: http://lenr.org/papers/pdf/Bockris01.pdf http://lenr.org/papers/pdf/Chubb01.pdf http://lenr.org/papers/pdf/Miley01.pdf http://lenr.org/papers/pdf/Nagel01.pdf http://lenr.org/papers/pdf/Shamoo01.pdf I created a web page for the upcoming ICCF-10 conference. It does not have a home yet. We reserved the name "ICCF10.org" but it is not connected to the web page yet. For now, you can see it here: http://members.directvinternet.com/jedrothwell/ICCFMain.htm Comments & suggestions are welcome. Let me know if you think this announcement lacks something that a respectable physics conference announcement aught to have. Also let me know if the heading or photograph go off your page and cannot be seen. - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Sep 12 14:06:14 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id OAA26552; Thu, 12 Sep 2002 14:04:33 -0700 Resent-Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 14:04:33 -0700 From: Robin van Spaandonk To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: "cold electricity." Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 07:03:57 +1000 Organization: Improving Message-ID: References: <08qtnu4mmn5h3rphums08ei9t6bcf9ovi9@4ax.com> In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.92/32.572 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id OAA26496 Resent-Message-ID: <"BTHhr2.0.oU6.W5GWz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/47981 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: In reply to thomas malloy's message of Thu, 12 Sep 2002 02:03:06 -0500: Hi, [snip] >>Robin van Spaandonk posted; >>[snip >>This would be a soliton wave. >> > >So Robin; > >Do you know of a way to generate the electrodynamic equivalent of the >soliton wave? [snip] Sorry, I only had two cents, now I'm broke. ;) Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ Competition provides the motivation, Cooperation provides the means. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Sep 13 04:48:17 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id EAA06074; Fri, 13 Sep 2002 04:45:24 -0700 Resent-Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 04:45:24 -0700 Message-ID: <001701c25b11$cd664b00$3c11b83f computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: Cc: Subject: Re: Gravity Repels Negative Charges? Possible Antigravity? Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 05:39:06 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Resent-Message-ID: <"OG-Rx1.0.lU1.K_SWz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/47982 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: In going over the String Circle particle model so that it would square with David Bergman's Rotating Circle model, www.commonsensescience.org I find the following: Proton Radius R = kq^2/E = 1.538e-18 meters Energy E = mc^2 = 1/2 CV^2 = 1/2 LI^2 = 1.5e-10 joule Charge q = CV = +1.602e-19 coulombs Displacement Current I = C *dV/dt = 5e6 amperes Capacitance C = 2(pi)R*eo = 8.55e-29 farads Inductance L = 2(pi)R*uo = 1.215e-23 henry Impedance Z = (L/C)^1/2 = 377 ohms Frequency f = (1/LC)^1/2 = 3.1e25 Hertz Period t = (LC)^1/2 = 3.22e-26 seconds Time Dilation and Hypocharge: Since General Relativity stipulates that angular acceleration results in the slowing down of the "internal clock" of the circling energy in the particle, there appears to be a constant positive "hypocharge" of +1.43e-37 coulombs in addition to the frame invariant charge q of +1.602e-19 coulombs. The Time Dilation Dt is found to be the square root of the ratio of the electrostatic force Fes to the gravitational force Fg: Dt = (Fes/Fg)^1/2 = (kq^2/G*m^2) = 1.12e18 which results in the Hypocharge q' = Dt*q = +1.43e-37 coulombs. Relativistic Electrodynamics dictates that ALL Like Charges attract (or lose repulsion) when their velocity is near the speed of light c. Further, since the gravitational force varies as 1/r^2 the force must be from the radial field of a point charge q'. Thus the attractive gravitational force between two protons at one meter separation: G*m^2/r^2 = kq'2/r^2 = 1.8e-64 newtons Logically a negative charge -q will be repelled by the gravity field (which appears to be borne out by the Biefield-Brown experiments) and by the "possibility" that negative electrons isolated in space are repelled by gravitational fields, as indicated by the net positive charge on the ionosphere? Antigravity Effect? http://www.rognerud.com/physics/html/t_brown.html Fred From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Sep 13 05:44:34 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id FAA05809; Fri, 13 Sep 2002 05:43:44 -0700 Resent-Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 05:43:44 -0700 Subject: Gravity Society web site updated To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hamdix verisoft.com.tr Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 16:43:21 +0400 Message-ID: Resent-Message-ID: <"IMWP93.0.hQ1._rTWz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/47983 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Hello, I updated the Gravity Society web site with recent developments and releases including a paper of E. Podkletnov and G. Modanese appearing today at LANL database. http://www.gravity-society.org Regards, hamdi ucar From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Sep 13 07:22:30 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id HAA18043; Fri, 13 Sep 2002 07:21:39 -0700 Resent-Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 07:21:39 -0700 Message-ID: <20020913142106.51225.qmail web40401.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 07:21:06 -0700 (PDT) From: Charles Ford Subject: Bizarre!!! Off topic "Coinkidink" To: "Vortex-L Bill Beaty's list" , freenrg MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Resent-Message-ID: <"GQR1w3.0.eP4.pHVWz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/47984 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: look at the September 11 numbers for the New York Lotery http://www.nylottery.org/winner/numbersres.php ===== Charles Ford KC5-OWZ cjford1 yahoo.com cjford1 swbell.net __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! News - Today's headlines http://news.yahoo.com From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Sep 13 07:57:52 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id HAA05130; Fri, 13 Sep 2002 07:56:49 -0700 Resent-Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 07:56:49 -0700 Message-ID: <3D81FD15.8060508 rtpatlanta.com> Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 10:58:29 -0400 From: "Terry Blanton" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Bizarre!!! Off topic "Coinkidink" References: <20020913142106.51225.qmail web40401.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"0jLfD3.0.3G1.noVWz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/47985 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Charles Ford wrote: >look at the September 11 numbers for the New York Lotery > >http://www.nylottery.org/winner/numbersres.php > > And the closing price for Chicago S&P Futures the same day: >http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&cid=520&u=/ap/20020911/ap_wo_en_bu/us_911_futures_1&printer=1< From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Sep 13 09:42:23 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id JAA14063; Fri, 13 Sep 2002 09:41:31 -0700 Resent-Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 09:41:31 -0700 Reply-To: From: "Keith Nagel" To: Subject: RE: Gravity Society web site updated Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 12:56:16 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Importance: Normal X-Rcpt-To: Resent-Message-ID: <"JKIPP1.0.eR3.wKXWz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/47986 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Hi Hamdi. Thanks for the update. The link provided for the paper seems difficult to reach from here, perhaps this is a mirror site outside the US? Or it's down? Anyway, I had better luck with this link http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/physics/0209051 for the paper. K. -----Original Message----- From: hamdix verisoft.com.tr [mailto:hamdix@verisoft.com.tr] Sent: Friday, September 13, 2002 8:43 AM To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Gravity Society web site updated Hello, I updated the Gravity Society web site with recent developments and releases including a paper of E. Podkletnov and G. Modanese appearing today at LANL database. http://www.gravity-society.org Regards, hamdi ucar From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Sep 13 10:08:54 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id KAA28898; Fri, 13 Sep 2002 10:07:30 -0700 Resent-Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 10:07:30 -0700 Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 13:08:01 -0400 (EDT) From: John Schnurer To: Vortex Subject: Energy, New Energy, Free Energy Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Resent-Message-ID: <"UySea1.0.S37.IjXWz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/47987 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Dear People, General comments about: A) "Free Energy" B) "New Age Energy Research" C) "New Age Word Salad Quack Gadgeteers" D) "New Energy Research Guessers" E) "Internet Energy Education" F) "Second Law of Thermodynamics" G) "Mathematics, Predictions, Ideal Non Real and QM Systems" H) "Physical Experimental Results" I) "Real World Systems, Non Closed Systems" J) "Energy From Unexpected Sources" NOTES on A through J 1] These are not all the same. Some texts put some of these together and this further confuses matters. EACH and every example of these must be Carefully and Separately addressed. The term (A) is not usually defined and has no common definition. 2] Items (B) through (G) inclusive, if considered at all must be individually defined and addressed. In general mathematical proofs should be used only as possible guides. Mathematics, Theory, including but not limited to Quantum Theory, Ideal Examples, Perfect Examples, Sealed Systems are not equal to reality nor are they Laws. Examples: i] There is much discussion of Second Law of Thermodynamics and broad sweeping generalizations are often made. It is not common for systems under discussion to be specifically defined. The Second Law of Thermodynamics applies to certain narrow and specifically defined systems. ii] Quantum Theory is a Theory, a Mathematical construct which is sometimes offered, to greater or lesser degrees as Physical Law, proof and basis for further movement toward claims asserting proofs. The bottom line is every part of energy research as described in Internet Posts and on WWW sites is frequently cloudy. Often definition is lacking. 3] Item (H) through (I) inclusive may yield external power or prime movers and do not per se violate any laws. However, Each Example must, at the Very Least be defined and well explained AND be backed up by Experimental Physics in more than one example and a survey of results and reproducibility to approach being considered valid. All else are variations of guesses or suppositions or less than this. If one approaches matters in this general way there is probably going to be a lot less friction and real world methods and system may be allowed to surface as beginnings of useful science. Comment which makes these topics more clear is welcome, and solicited, please. JH _____________________________________________ From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Sep 13 13:12:27 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id NAA02227; Fri, 13 Sep 2002 13:11:27 -0700 Resent-Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 13:11:27 -0700 Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 13:09:50 -0700 From: Jones Beene Subject: Re: Gravity Repels Negative Charges? Possible Antigravity? To: vortex-l eskimo.com Message-id: <003001c25b61$84302be0$0a016ea8 cpq> MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-priority: Normal References: <001701c25b11$cd664b00$3c11b83f computer> Resent-Message-ID: <"Jq_bm1.0.ZY.kPaWz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/47988 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Fred, > Logically a negative charge -q will be repelled by the gravity field (which appears to > be borne out by the Biefield-Brown experiments) BUT in the B-B effect, it is the positive charge that appears to have the anti-gravity effect... > by the "possibility" that negative electrons isolated in space are repelled by gravitational fields, > as indicated by the net positive charge on the ionosphere? or else, free electrons from higher up are preferentially attracted by gravity to earth and accumulate there, giving the net positive charge on the ionosphere ;-} Jones From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Sep 13 15:30:56 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id PAA27578; Fri, 13 Sep 2002 15:30:02 -0700 Resent-Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 15:30:02 -0700 From: Robin van Spaandonk To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: EVs Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2002 08:29:24 +1000 Organization: Improving Message-ID: <6ep4ouk0c04fg376h4km5nmcsfna4b6ifv 4ax.com> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.92/32.572 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id PAA27522 Resent-Message-ID: <"w8WVS3.0.qk6.gRcWz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/47989 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Hi, If EVs are real, then small EVs could catalyze fusion much as negative muons do, but with the advantage that they have a much longer half life, unless destroyed by the nuclear energy, in which case a roughly even distribution of the nuclear energy across many electrons would result in each only carrying insufficient energy to be detected as ionising radiation. IOW the signature of CF ;) Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ Competition provides the motivation, Cooperation provides the means. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Sep 13 17:37:03 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id RAA08447; Fri, 13 Sep 2002 17:35:52 -0700 Resent-Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 17:35:52 -0700 Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 17:34:12 -0700 From: Jones Beene Subject: Re: EVs To: vortex-l eskimo.com Message-id: <000b01c25b86$73214260$0a016ea8 cpq> MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-priority: Normal References: <6ep4ouk0c04fg376h4km5nmcsfna4b6ifv 4ax.com> Resent-Message-ID: <"tX6Fi3.0.v32.dHeWz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/47990 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: From: "Robin van Spaandonk" > If EVs are real, then small EVs could catalyze fusion much as negative muons do I believe that KS has indicated someting like this this before, but he feels that the near-term prospects for using EVs alone makes more sense. Others have had a similar idea, see: http://www.ideosphere.com/fx-bin/Claim?claim=EVcfd Also, other observers have noticed the functional similarity between EVs, BECs, and Ball lightning - for possible use as a more stable negatively charged catalyst for fusion http://home.planet.nl/~icblsec/isbl99/ab_vlasov.html JB From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Sep 13 17:48:19 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id RAA14971; Fri, 13 Sep 2002 17:45:22 -0700 Resent-Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 17:45:22 -0700 Message-ID: <3D828769.F7A0C93B ix.netcom.com> Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 17:48:41 -0700 From: Akira Kawasaki X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en]C-CCK-MCD NSCPCD472 (Win95; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Vortex Subject: [Fwd: What's New for Sep 13, 2002] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"BKXNH.0.rf3.YQeWz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/47991 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: -------- Original Message -------- Subject: What's New for Sep 13, 2002 Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 16:33:19 -0400 (EDT) From: "What's New" To: aki ix.netcom.com WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 13 Sep 02 Washington, DC 1. PERPETUAL MOTION: FAULTY WHEEL BEARING SPOILS DEMONSTRATION. Yes, it's another one. Inventor Carl Tilley rented the Nashville SuperSpeedway on Saturday to demonstrate his amazing electric generator. He took a 1981 DeLorean and replaced the engine with a conventional electric motor. The motor is connected to twelve ordinary 12-volt batteries. Here's the good part: the motor not only runs the DeLorean, it also runs a generator that charges the batteries, so the car just keeps going. Can it do that? Well, not without a good generator. As Tilley explains, "it utilizes the generation of static electricity rather than cutting magnetic fields which has been common practice to date." Further details are not available. Eric Krieg, the relentless foe of perpetual motion quacks at PHACT, the Philadelphia Association for Critical Thinking, predicted that the DeLorean would suffer mechanical failure after 25 miles or so. Actually, Tilley stopped the demonstration at 52 miles, explaining that a wheel bearing had failed. That happens when you lubricate bearings with snake oil. 2. TERRORISM: ABC SMUGGLES IN A MOCK NUCLEAR WEAPON - SORT OF. While the US is spending billions on missile defense, ABC News shipped a simulated nuclear weapon from Istanbul to New York. The mock bomb contained 15 pounds of depleted uranium. On the Sept. 11 ABC Good Morning America program, Physicist Tom Cochran of the Natural Resources Defense Council called it, "A perfect mock-up. It replicates everything but the capability to explode." Well, not quite. The U-238 in depleted uranium is far less radioactive than the U-235 in weapons grade uranium, and thus is much harder to detect. Depleted uranium wouldn't even make a good dirty bomb. Nevertheless, the ABC stunt demonstrates that a perfect missile defense would only ensure that anyone planning a nuclear attack would use a simpler delivery system. 3. RADIATION PROTECTION: PROTECT THE MOST IMPORTANT PARTS FIRST. Levi Strauss is introducing a new line of "Dockers" with pockets that protect your testicles from the radiation produced by a cell phone in the pocket. If you carry your cell phone in a shielded pocket, however, expect a sharp reduction in incoming calls. For the latest in protection devices, you have only to look in the seat pocket on an airliner. There with the airsickness bag, is a catalog of really cool stuff marketed by the airline. The latest is a line of expensive wrist watches that contain Teslar Chips. The ad explains that the Teslar Chip will protect you from harmful EMF and relieve stress. Should you have any doubt, there are Kirlian photographs showing increased energy around a finger, induced by the Teslar chip. Glen Rein, PhD. confirmed that the Teslar Chip increased immune system components 76%. Dr. Scott Morley, D.Sc.,PhD., MD showed it eliminated ambient EMF from his patients. I'm reaching for the airsickness bag now. THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND and THE AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY Opinions are the author's, and are not necessarily shared by the University or the American Physical Society, but they should be. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Sep 14 13:06:03 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id NAA27977; Sat, 14 Sep 2002 13:04:21 -0700 Resent-Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2002 13:04:21 -0700 Message-ID: <126601c25c29$67f63b40$6401a8c0 cs910664a> Reply-To: "Colin Quinney" From: "Colin Quinney" To: Cc: , "hamdi ucar" , , "John Schnurer" , , , , References: <64.2520fca9.2ab38454 aol.com> Subject: Re: [jlnlabs] (Info) Investigation of HV discharges in low pressure gases... Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2002 16:00:41 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH LOGIN at fep02-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com from [24.101.98.221] using ID at Sat, 14 Sep 2002 16:03:31 -0400 Resent-Message-ID: <"eMh0m2.0.sq6.5PvWz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/47992 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Hi Rick, 2 MV is mentioned more than once so it's probably not a typo. http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/physics/0209051 I'll tell you what I want to see is pictures. We chastised Roschin/Godin for no pix of their apparatus and I think we should hold Podkletnov et al to the same standard. Look what JL Naudin has done with pix. Videos even. He's practically created a small industry of lifters because a pix is worth 1000 words and a video worth 10 times that again. I'd love to see the gravity impulse generator in action with a video that can be seen on the Internet as I'm sure would everybody else! Seeing is believing. Hamdi & John seem to have some access to the Gravity.org web site so maybe we should politely request them to put the request for a video to Eugene Podkletnov and Giovanni Modanese.. (?) Colin ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rick Monteverde" To: Sent: Friday, September 13, 2002 5:45 PM Subject: Re: [jlnlabs] (Info) Investigation of HV discharges in low pressure gases... > I wonder if it really means 2 million volts or if that's a typo. > > - Rick Monteverde, > Honolulu Hawaii > > > >Dear All, > > > >You will find a very interesting paper, see below : > > > > Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/47993 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Dear Colin and all, I'd love to have more information about the Impulse Gravity Generator (IGG) but currently no more information available from Podkletnov site. See my earlier post on this subject "Re: Antigravity researchers should publish". I think the phenomenon behind the IGG is so radical just like the Godin's machine, it require serious scientific approach. That is popularizing the IGG can only adds speculations but not the required interest. While reading the Recent article "EVALUATION OF AN IMPULSE GRAVITY GENERATOR BASED BEAMED PROPULSION CONCEPT" I thought even the Newton's second Law (F=m.a) may not be applicable on gravity impulse. That is Newton's gravity model can not be adapted here (F = G.m1.m2/r^2). Maybe General Relativity may help where is no accelerating force between bodies but space curvature. In GR, bodies simply follow the geodesic (the spacetime curvature) and appears to accelerate when observed by a reference which not follows this curvature. Force arise when bodies are prevented to follow to curvature, the free fall. when two bodies (m1,m2) are gravitating, each one follows the curvature of the other. m1 accelerate proportional to m2 mass and vice versa. All I can do here is try to apply GR principles in simple Newton's gravity. Accelerations a1 and a2 of gravitating masses m1 and m2 can be written as a1 = k.m2 (1) a2 = k.m1 where k is a constant determined gravity constant and distance between gravitating bodies. Applying F = m.a formula to find equivalent forces for obtaining these accelerations F1 = a1.m1 = k.m2.m1 (2) F2 = a2.m2 = k.m1.m2 therefore F1 = F2 satisfying Newton's third law. But if a curvature is created artificially, Eq.1 is not applicable therefore there would be no equality between forces F1 and F2. Explicitly, If IGG create a spacetime curvature, objects lying in the gravity impulse beam are accelerated but the IGG itself may not be affected by this situation therefore it will not accelerate at all. When IGG and masses subjected to its beam is considered and mechanically interacting system, a violation of Newton's third law occurs because action-reaction inequality. Actually this violation is very handy for a space propulsion system, where and spacecraft can accelerate itself just like somebody trying to raise oneself on air by pulling his boots up. This method instead works here because boots will not to pull one's hands down with an equal and opposite force. An IGG mounted at back (bottom) of spacecraft will accelerate by "pushing" part of its body forward. If IGG does not obeys Newton's laws, energy gained by accelerating bodies may not be directly related to energy consumed by IGG, because there would be no classical mechanism to provide energy exchange, and may GR help to understand it. Actually, I have only an introductionary understanding of GR and no mathematical support so all I wrote here is for show theoretical support for IGG is vital. Colin Quinney wrote: > > Hi Rick, > > 2 MV is mentioned more than once so it's probably not a typo. > http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/physics/0209051 > > I'll tell you what I want to see is pictures. We chastised Roschin/Godin for > no pix of their apparatus and I think we should hold Podkletnov et al to the > same standard. Look what JL Naudin has done with pix. Videos even. He's > practically created a small industry of lifters because a pix is worth 1000 > words and a video worth 10 times that again. I'd love to see the gravity > impulse generator in action with a video that can be seen on the Internet as > I'm sure would everybody else! Seeing is believing. Hamdi & John seem to > have some access to the Gravity.org web site so maybe we should politely > request them to put the request for a video to Eugene Podkletnov and > Giovanni Modanese.. (?) > > Colin > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Rick Monteverde" > To: > Sent: Friday, September 13, 2002 5:45 PM > Subject: Re: [jlnlabs] (Info) Investigation of HV discharges in low pressure > gases... > > > I wonder if it really means 2 million volts or if that's a typo. > > > > - Rick Monteverde, > > Honolulu Hawaii > > > > > > >Dear All, > > > > > >You will find a very interesting paper, see below : > > > > > > Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/47994 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: In reply to Jones Beene's message of Fri, 13 Sep 2002 17:34:12 -0700: Hi, [snip] Thanks, I would never have found either of these references! >From: "Robin van Spaandonk" > >> If EVs are real, then small EVs could catalyze fusion much as negative muons >do > >I believe that KS has indicated someting like this this before, but he feels >that the near-term prospects for using EVs alone makes more sense. Others have >had a similar idea, see: > >http://www.ideosphere.com/fx-bin/Claim?claim=EVcfd > >Also, other observers have noticed the functional similarity between EVs, BECs, >and Ball lightning - for possible use as a more stable negatively charged >catalyst for fusion > >http://home.planet.nl/~icblsec/isbl99/ab_vlasov.html > >JB > Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ Competition provides the motivation, Cooperation provides the means. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Sep 15 10:33:42 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id KAA28690; Sun, 15 Sep 2002 10:32:39 -0700 Resent-Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2002 10:32:39 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2002 12:31:46 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: thomas malloy Subject: Re: Tesla H Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Resent-Message-ID: <"-8Mlx3.0.A07.tGCXz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/47995 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: >Iraq: World's First Scalar War? > >Part 1, by Bill Morgan > >Source material: Scientist Tom Bearden, Cheniere.Org > >Scalar Potential Interferometers >"Tesla Howitzers" > >With the Bush people rushing us toward war it is important for everyone >to realize the true and rather frightening possibility that this war >will involve the use of scalar electromagnetic weapons, by any of a >number of possessors of such weapons. They are called "Longitudinal Wave >Interferometers," or "Tesla howitzers", and use longitudinal (LW) >electromagnetic (EM) waves to accomplish true action-at-a-distance. >These are the weapons Khrushchev spoke of 40 years ago, when he >declared: > >"We have a new weapon, just within the portfolio of our scientists, so >to speak, which is so powerful that, if unrestrainedly used, it could >wipe out all life on earth. It is a fantastic weapon." Khrushchev, to >the Presidium, Jan. 1960 > >These are also the weapons referred to in 1997 by Defense Secretary >William Cohen, when he said: > >"Others [terrorists] are engaging even in an eco-type of terrorism >whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes >remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves... So there are plenty >of ingenious minds out there that are at work finding ways in which they >can wreak terror upon other nations...It's real, and that's the reason >why we have to intensify our [counter terrorism] efforts." - Defense >Secretary William Cohen, 1997 > >One of the leading experts in the new science of scalar >electromagnetics is scientist Thomas E. Bearden, and he has published >many papers at his website Cheniere.Org. In a letter to a writer named >"Russell" (Correspondence section) Bearden says, > >"In short, Russell, the Secretary of Defense of the United States >confirmed that there are indeed novel kinds of EM weapons, right now and >have been for some time, which have been and are being used to (1) >initiate earthquakes, (2) engineer the weather and climate, and (3) >initiate the eruption of volcanoes. We wrote about those exact uses of >the weaponry decades ago. Several nations now have such weapons. Three >of them (two on one side and the other on a hostile side) are even >firing practice shots into Western Australia, as a convenient test >range." > >http://www.earthchangestv.com/ufo/0209gandor.htm > >At Cheniere.org one can find Bearden's 1990 paper Historical Background >of Scalar EM Weapons and see that certain possessors of these new >superweapons have been developing them for several decades now. He >traces the clandestine development through the sightings of anomalous >phenomena all around the globe, by the statements Soviet leaders have >made, and by the development of a new electromagnetic theory which >restores certain "lost equations" which had been thrown out long ago in >an attempt to "simplify things." Apparently the Russians were the first >to restore the lost equations which uncover the domain of scalar >electromagnetics. > >The new Scalar Electromagnetic weapons utilize a new type of >electromagnetic waves called "longitudinal waves" or "scalar waves." >They are called by other names, as Bearden points out: > >"We now visualize the formation of waves of pure stress in the >spacetime medium (in the vacuum). These we call scalar EM waves, Tesla >waves, electrogravitational waves, longitudinal EM waves, waves of pure >potential, electrostatic/magnetostatic waves, and zero-vector EM waves. >All these terms are synonymous. Each sheds its own particular light upon >the nature of these waves or of their original discoverer, Nikola >Tesla." Tom Bearden > >http://www.cheniere.org/books/ferdelance/s23.htm > >So there are a number of names for these newly discovered waves. > >The big Tesla howitzers are aimed at their targets by using a worldwide >electromagnetic pattern called the "Woodpecker Grid," begun by the >Russians in 1976. You can even "hear" the Woodpecker Grid at Bearden's >website. > >Several times during the Cold War the Russians tried to get an >agreement on limiting the use of these weapons, which Brezhnev said were >"more terrible than anything the world has known." And at that time, >Bearden points out, nobody in the West even knew what they were talking >about. > >The "Fer de Lance" Briefing > > >In his briefing "Fer de Lance" Slides 66-71. Bearden describes what it >would be like to operate one of these longitudinal wave interferometers >and aim it at place on earth using the Woodpecker Grid. By placing a >"marker beacon" at that target location (the glowing orbs of plasma that >are being sighted all around the world) the system can "read" the >location of the target area and obtain pin-point targeting. The "Fer de >Lance" briefing is a must read for anyone wanting to know what is really >going on in our world today. It is a set of graphics slides with >Bearden's explanations. >Instantaneous effect > >It is hard to imagine, but a strike with longitudinal wave weapon is >instantaneous as the scalar waves do not go through our "3-space" world, >but around it. As Bearden puts it: > >"... it is possible to focus the potential for the effects of a weapon >through spacetime itself, in a manner so that mass and energy do not >"travel through space" from the transmitter to the target at all. >Instead, ripples and patterns in the fabric of spacetime itself are >manipulated to meet and interfere in and at the local spacetime of some >distant target. There interference of these ripple patterns creates the >desired energetic effect (hence the term energetics) directly in and >through the target itself, emerging from the very spacetime (vacuum) in >which the target is imbedded at its distant location." Bearden >Fer-de-Lance > > >What Can These New Superweapons Do? > >1. Exothermic mode >In what is called an "exothermic mode" the howitzers can cause a blast >of heat at the interference zone, an explosion of near-nuclear >proportions. It could topple buildings and cause other destruction. Or >it could be set wide and heat the atmosphere in that region. Or it could >be set to simply destroy all electronics in that interference (target) >zone, or to destroy the hubs of the electric power grids of a very wide >area. Although it seems unbelievable, the actual energy of the blast is >not traveling through space to hit the target, but actually being made >to emerge from the local vacuum in the interference (target) zone. > >Using the exothermic mode it is possible to make any airplane drop from >the sky, anywhere. It is possible to destroy any missile, in its flight >path or in its silo. Bearden sites many instances of downed planes he >believes were tests of the scalar weapons. (Gandor, Newfoundland) > >"The Woodpecker grid/howitzer weapon system can be placed over the >ocean and used against cruise missiles, naval surface-to-air and >surface-to-surface missiles, submarine-launched ballistic and cruise >missiles, etc. Placed over a carrier task force, it can also take care >of the aircraft launched by the carrier as fast as they are launched. It >can also handily take care of the missiles launched by guided-missile >cruisers of the accompanying task force." > >(Bearden http://www.cheniere.org/books/ferdelance/s65.htm ) > >Here is a slide which shows the exothermic mode of action. > >2. Endothermic mode >In a second howitzer mode called the "endothermic" mode, the howitzer >sucks energy out of the target area, essentially creating a blast of >cold at the distant target. It is even capable of freezing parts of the >ocean. Bearden gives a number of cases where these "cold explosions" >have been witnessed, mostly by airline pilots. April 9, 1984: 1 2 3 ) >A huge mushroom cloud of mostly water is seen rising miles into the sky >from out of the ocean, an awesome sight. > >In the endothermic mode the sucked-out energy must go somewhere, so it >is vented out at some other chosen spot on the earth. These endothermic >plumes have been photographed by satellite. > >Bearden envisions the use of cold explosions in a scalar war: > >"Cold explosions can be used to freeze tanks, personnel, and equipment. >The equipment and tanks thaw out. The personnel thaw out too, but they >are dead when they do." Bearden, Fer-de-Lance > >Starting with this slide from Fer de Lance you can see a number of >sightings of giant mushroom clouds of water vapor which Bearden believes >were created by the Russians testing the howitzers in endothermic ("cold >explosion") mode. (Keep clicking "Next Slide"). > >In another slide the endothermic mode of operation is shown. > >3. "Mindsnapper" mode >In a third and very terrifying mode the longitudinal wave patterns can >be adjusted to affect the human mind. Bearden has dubbed this mode the >"Mind-snapper" mode. Use of scalar waves in this mode is also called >"psychoenergetics" or "psychotronics." At low power the mind-snapper >causes everyone in the interference zone to fall unconscious. At high >power the mind-body connection is "snapped" and instant death occurs. >Bearden describes the manner of death: > >"Those hit by the scalar EM weapon, however, have a most peculiar death >mode. > >"Death comes-instantly and totally. There is no convulsion, no >response. The entire nervous system is destroyed instantly. Every living >cell in the body is killed instantly, including all bacteria, germs, >etc. > >"A body hit with this thing falls like a limp rag and lies where it >falls. It doesn't decay in even 30-45 days. In a macabre fashion, it's >been reduced to something like food irradiated with nuclear radiation; >everything is killed, so the material is preserved for an extended >period before any decay can set in." > >http://www.cheniere.org/books/ferdelance/s81.htm > >In psychoenergetics mode the weapons can also induce a kind of >hypnogogic trance in the minds of anyone in the target zone. It this >involuntary trance state one's mind would be completely open to >suggestions and orders. Bearden believes that this is what happened in >the case of one Captain Button who inexplicably flew his A-10 Warthog >airplane into a mountain was a test of the scalar weapons, taking over a >man's mind and controlling him from a distance. > >"Remember Captain Button, flying his A-10 Warthog toward the range, >suddenly peeled away from his companions and flew off cross country for >over an hour? He ignored all radio messages, circled at one point >(probably dropped his ordnance there), then flew until he crashed into >the side of a mountain and was killed. > >"That was a deliberate test in the mid-U.S. to demonstrate that a human >could be controlled for one hour, while doing a technical set of tasks >(flying an airplane), in a hypnogogic state, successfully. The test was >a total success." > >http://www.cheniere.org/misc/time.htm > >4. Earthquake/Weather mode > >As Secretary of Defense William Cohen pointed out, these same >longitudinal wave interferometers can be used to create earthquakes in >the distant target zone, as well as tornados and other storms, and the >precipitation of volcanic eruptions. Weather can be manipulated by using >the exothermic mode to heat the atmosphere in one place, and using >endothermic mode to cool the atmosphere in another place. Even the jet >stream can be pulled this way and that by these actions. > >Anyone one who keeps watch of the weather radar date from an >unretouched source like weatherTAP will have seen many anomolies which >MAY indicate hits by the howitzers. According to Bearden the Russians >(KGB) have been manipulating weather over North America for decades. >Cheniere.Org has a number of pictures of such radar anomolies, as well >as some unusual cloud formations which, Bearden says, MAY be showing the >effects of the scalar wave patterns traveling the channels of the >Woodpecker Grid. Keep your eyes on the skies. > >5. Death Ray > >Nikola Tesla had envisioned a "Death Ray," and now it is a reality. > >"Those hit by the scalar EM weapon, however, have a most peculiar >deathmode. > >"Death comes - instantly and totally. There is no convulsion, no >response. The entire nervous system is destroyed instantly. Every living >cell in the body is killed instantly, including all bacteria, germs, >etc. > >"A body hit with this thing falls like a limp rag and lies where it >falls. It doesn't decay in even 30-45 days. In a macabre fashion, it's >been reduced to something like food irradiated with nuclear radiation; >everything is killed, so the material is preserved for an extended >period before any decay can set in." > >http://www.cheniere.org/books/ferdelance/s81.htm > >"Ordinary" Warfare Obsolete > >Warfare has been changed forever by the development of these scalar >energy longitudinal wave howitzers. Remember, the power for these >weapons comes from the time domain, longitudinal EM waves in the vacuum >of empty space, and the power is tremendous and mind-boggling. Being >able to blast away at any target from a distant control booth is >something that has never happened before. This is incredible power to >be in control of and it divides the history of weaponry into "before" >and "after." And the destructive power of these weapons is delivered >instantaneously to the target from the local vacuum at the place of the >target. > >Bearden describes how the old-style machinery of war has been made >obsolete. Planes can be dropped to the ground, tanks are obsolete. >Bearden says of the whole "Star Wars" defense system (SDI) : "It's >obsolete to Soviet scalar EM weapons that are already deployed and >operationally tested in place!" > > >"Interference phenomena are key. One can get action at a distance -- >even over hundreds of thousands of kilometers. > >"One can engineer gravitational and inertial effects. > >"One can engineer the nucleus, including transmute it, easily and >cheaply. One could clean up all the nuclear wastes. Electromagnetic >energy can be produced at a distant target, or extracted from a distant >target. This is not energy transmission through space in the form of EM >force fields. Instead, it is transmission through spacetime in the form >of electrogravitational potentials. Conventional EM shielding is >ineffective against scalar EM." > >http://www.cheniere.org/books/ferdelance/s104.htm > >The fact that these weapons can transmute atoms means they can have a >metal softening effect, leaving one to wonder if it were a clandestine >use of a scalar interfermeter which brought down the Twin Towers. We may >never know, since THAT evidence was so quickly destroyed without study. > >Tesla Domes > >The Tesla howitzers can be used in a nearly impregnable defensive mode >whereby they throw up a dome (Tesla Dome) or a sphere (Tesla Globe) of >highly powerful electromagnetic energy, enough to "dud" or destroy >missiles which try to penetrate them. Once again, this energy is not >going through space from the howitzer, but being made to emerge from the >local vacuum at the location of the shell. KGB tests of these domes >have been witnessed by airline pilots around the world. Bearden gives >many examples of the Tesla domes being sighted around the world in his >briefing paper "Fer-de-Lance." (Russian dome test, another globe >incident, yet another globe test). These giant electromagnetic domes can >be hundreds of miles across, or narrowed down more to total >impermeability. > >By using nested domes one can protect the domed area even against >nuclear radiation itself. Tesla globes can be used to hit airborne >targets by simply placing a globe of any chosen size in the flight path >of the incoming missile. It does double duty because the missile hits it >going in, and then the rubble hits it again going out the other side. > >Bearden cites a number of examples of these domes being tested around >the world: >March 20, 1969 | March 24, 1977 | August 17, 1980 | June 17, 1966 | >June 18, 1982 June 22, 1976 > >So while the Russians have arrived at a near perfect missile defense, >the West is still messing around trying to hit an incoming missile with >another missile. > > > >Vulnerabilities > >Bearden lists some of the vulnerabilities the new weapons create: > >"Almost every weapon system we presently have -- or are developing -- >is totally vulnerable to scalar EM weaponry. > This includes personnel, electronics (including fuzing and >warhead), explosives, propellants, fuels, ordnance, ships, submarines, >torpedoes, aircraft, helicopters, missiles, drones, rockets, tanks, >armored vehicles, weapons carriers, self-propelled and towed artillery, >communications, [see also] satellites, radars, command and control, >directed energy weapon systems, surveillance and sensor systems, mines, >artillery rounds and ammunition, nuclear warheads, etc. > We are in dire straits. We need a "Manhattan Project" of the >highest priority. Now! > The Soviets have already had the equivalent of seven or eight >Manhattan Projects in this area." > >http://www.cheniere.org/books/ferdelance/s105.htm > > >Crop circles, Glowing Orbs, and Scalar Interferometers > >Scalar interferometry may explain many unusual phenomena that are being >sighted. Two immediately come to mind, the glowing orbs that are being >seen in the skies around the world, and the crop circles. Both phenomena >could be easily accomplished with the new scalar superweapons. Balls of >plasma flying through the sky at phenomenal speeds may well be the >"marker beacons" of the scalar weapons. Marker beacons are created for >fine tuning the aiming of the devices. Air Force jets were recently sent >aloft from Edwards AFB to chase two just glowing orbs. After chasing >them a while, the orbs simple vanished. That is to say, the scalar beams >creating the orb were turned off. > >By feeding a graphic pattern into the aiming software such a plasma >ball could be made to trace out that pattern, at the distant >interference zone (target zone), making the standing crops fall over, >creating a crop circle. Remember there are many modes and effects of >these weapons. They are really the engineering of reality itself. > > >Summary >If Tom Bearden's information is correct then we will have to reexamine >world affairs in a new light, seeing the maneuvering of those forces who >possess the new weapons. For one thing, there is no defense against such >weapons other than having the weapons oneself. And it would appear that >Russia (actually the KGB) is the most advanced in the development of >these weapons, at least according to Tom Bearden, who has briefed the >U.S. Military on these issues a number of times. > >With the Bush cabal about to attack Iraq, against the objection of >nearly the entire rest of the world, one has to wonder if we are about >to see the world's first overt scalar war. > >If the U.S. is to prevail in that attack, it can only be with the tacit >permission of the Russian possessors of this technology, for they could >easily cause any sky or land attack to fail. They could drop the >warplanes out of the sky, cause tanks and all communications to fail, >cause whole battallions to drop dead like limp rags. If they wanted to >they could put up a Tesla dome over Baghdad that would be impenetrable >to missiles, planes and bombs. > >Won't it just be too tempting for some possessor of this technology to >try turn the tide of the coming war with longitudinal wave >interferometers? And will that lead to an all out war with these same >weapons? The world's first scalar electromagnetic war? Or will restraint >be shown, by all possesors of these weapons, allowing an old-fashioned >war to proceed in the old-fashioned way? > > >The devices called "Tesla howitzers" can be put to a myriad of peaceful >uses, including reversing global warming (vent the heat to outer space), >and preparing a surefire means of preventing any asteroids from hitting >the earth. > >Bearden says that the Russian possessors of these devices must surely >have understood that the devices could wipe out all life on earth, even >upsetting the scalar balance of earth and sun resulting in large storms >on the sun. They can also backfire on the user of them: > >"Perhaps with the free and open release of Tesla's secret, the >scientific and governmental bureaucracies will be shocked awake from >their slumber, and we can develop defenses before Armageddon occurs. >Perhaps there is hope after all -- for even Brezhnev, in his strange >July, 1975 proposal to the SALT talks, seemed to reveal a perception >that a turning point in war and weaponry may have been reached, and that >human imagination is incapable of dealing with the ability to totally >engineer reality itself. > >"Having tested the weapons, the Soviets must be aware that the >ill-provoked oscillation of timeflow affects the minds and thoughts -- >and the very lifestreams and even the collective species >unconsciousnesses -- of all lifeforms on earth. They must know that >these weapons are two-edged swords, and that the backlash from their use >can be far more terrible to the user than was the original effect to his >victim. > >"If we can avoid the Apocalypse, the fantastic secret of Nikola Tesla >can be employed to cure and elevate man, not kill him. Tesla's discovery >can eventually remove every conceivable external human limitation. If we >humans ourselves can elevate our consciousness to properly utilize the >Tesla electromagnetics, then Nikola Tesla -- who gave us the electrical >twentieth century in the first place -- may yet give us a fantastic new >future more shining and glorious than all the great scientists and sages >have imagined." > >http://www.cheniere.org/books/part1/teslaweapons.htm > >The secrecy with which this technology has been held from the human >race can only be called a crime again humanity. Instead of using these >incredible new discoveries for good, for free energy, and for healing, >shadowy groups around the world have used the technology to make >terrible weapons of war such as the earth has never dreamed of. > >A final word from Tom Bearden: > >"The "terror" in the "balance of terror" between nations has just >increased by many, many orders of magnitude. > >"The biblical prophecy that the Earth will be wiped out by "fire and >brimstone from heaven" is very near fulfillment now. > >"Put another way, the pucker factor -- even on the Russians who may >contemplate unleashing Armageddon -- is higher than any Western >strategic analyst has ever imagined, even in his wildest nightmares. > >"Truly these weapons are "more frightening than the mind of man has >imagined," as Brezhnev put it in 1975. > >"The frightening scalar EM weapons can be used, but only very, very >gingerly indeed. If a slight mistake is made, everybody loses >everything." > >http://www.cheniere.org/books/ferdelance/s74.htm > > > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Sep 16 04:24:07 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id EAA19015; Mon, 16 Sep 2002 04:23:11 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 04:23:11 -0700 Message-ID: <001501c25d6a$f463e860$1a09bf3f computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: Subject: Re: Relativistic Hypocharge and The Gravity Force Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 05:22:22 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Resent-Message-ID: <"NRuPF2.0._e4.VyRXz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/47996 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: The String Circle Particle Model or a similar model, David Bergman's Rotating Charge Circle: www.commonsensescience.org treats the electron and proton in much the same manner. The Relativistically Frame Invariant Charge q = CV = +/- 1.602e-19 coulombs, a constant for any particle size/mass. But, the Hypocharge q' for the proton and q'' for the electron = I/t = q/gamma for the respective particles comes about by time-dilation of the Displacement Current, I/gamma. However, due to Time-Dilation of the displacement current I = C*dV/dt, where Time-Dilation = (Fes/Fg)^1/2, at unit separation the particles "see" each other's Hypocharge in proportion to their own and the other's dilation gamma factor. Hence the gamma and hypocharge square relationship. +/- q' is ~ 1.43e-37 Coulombs for the proton/antiproton particle circle, and +/- q'' is ~ 7.8e-41 Coulombs for the electron/positron particle circle. Thus Fg = G*m1*m2/R^2 = k*q'^2/R^2 or k*q'*q''/R^2. k = 1/(4(pi)eo Fred From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Sep 16 11:53:28 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id LAA01026; Mon, 16 Sep 2002 11:48:45 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 11:48:45 -0700 Reply-To: From: "Keith Nagel" To: "Vortex" , Subject: RE: [jlnlabs] (Info) Investigation of HV discharges in low pressure gases... Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 15:03:24 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <3D83BFFD.B5EDC4C7 verisoft.com.tr> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Importance: Normal Resent-Message-ID: <"U33p51.0.yF.CUYXz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/47997 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Hi Hamdi, Colin, & All. The 2MV stood out for me too, I've worked with 1/2MV DC machines which were pretty frightening. But you'll notice he's using a marx bank generator, so the 2MV is impulse and quite do-able. One obvious typo is the faraday shield size, 2 cm???? Here he must mean meters. It would be nice to see some pics, but I think he's actually building these things so I don't miss them. I don't see that it would help much either to get publicity. Unless he's willing to provide samples of his SC disks, it would be too difficult to reproduce. That's where the magic is. All the rest is just the usual engineering problems. My beef is with his velocity measurements. That's a key piece of information, and it's a lot easier to measure than he's saying in the paper. Either he needs some help here, or he's done it and is keeping that bit close to his vest. I was really hoping to see that in this paper, it's been something like 6 months now... By the way, what a remarkable set of experiments, huh? I tip my hat to this guy, he's a truely great researcher. K. -----Original Message----- From: hamdi ucar [mailto:hamdix verisoft.com.tr] Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2002 7:02 PM To: Colin Quinney Cc: jlnlabs yahoogroups.com; orchestra@ttnet.net.tr; kyle_mcallister yahoo.com; John Schnurer; vortex-l@eskimo.com; forcefieldpropulsionphysics egroups.com; newelectrogravity yahoogroups.com; greenglow@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [jlnlabs] (Info) Investigation of HV discharges in low pressure gases... Dear Colin and all, I'd love to have more information about the Impulse Gravity Generator (IGG) but currently no more information available from Podkletnov site. See my earlier post on this subject "Re: Antigravity researchers should publish". I think the phenomenon behind the IGG is so radical just like the Godin's machine, it require serious scientific approach. That is popularizing the IGG can only adds speculations but not the required interest. While reading the Recent article "EVALUATION OF AN IMPULSE GRAVITY GENERATOR BASED BEAMED PROPULSION CONCEPT" I thought even the Newton's second Law (F=m.a) may not be applicable on gravity impulse. That is Newton's gravity model can not be adapted here (F = G.m1.m2/r^2). Maybe General Relativity may help where is no accelerating force between bodies but space curvature. In GR, bodies simply follow the geodesic (the spacetime curvature) and appears to accelerate when observed by a reference which not follows this curvature. Force arise when bodies are prevented to follow to curvature, the free fall. when two bodies (m1,m2) are gravitating, each one follows the curvature of the other. m1 accelerate proportional to m2 mass and vice versa. All I can do here is try to apply GR principles in simple Newton's gravity. Accelerations a1 and a2 of gravitating masses m1 and m2 can be written as a1 = k.m2 (1) a2 = k.m1 where k is a constant determined gravity constant and distance between gravitating bodies. Applying F = m.a formula to find equivalent forces for obtaining these accelerations F1 = a1.m1 = k.m2.m1 (2) F2 = a2.m2 = k.m1.m2 therefore F1 = F2 satisfying Newton's third law. But if a curvature is created artificially, Eq.1 is not applicable therefore there would be no equality between forces F1 and F2. Explicitly, If IGG create a spacetime curvature, objects lying in the gravity impulse beam are accelerated but the IGG itself may not be affected by this situation therefore it will not accelerate at all. When IGG and masses subjected to its beam is considered and mechanically interacting system, a violation of Newton's third law occurs because action-reaction inequality. Actually this violation is very handy for a space propulsion system, where and spacecraft can accelerate itself just like somebody trying to raise oneself on air by pulling his boots up. This method instead works here because boots will not to pull one's hands down with an equal and opposite force. An IGG mounted at back (bottom) of spacecraft will accelerate by "pushing" part of its body forward. If IGG does not obeys Newton's laws, energy gained by accelerating bodies may not be directly related to energy consumed by IGG, because there would be no classical mechanism to provide energy exchange, and may GR help to understand it. Actually, I have only an introductionary understanding of GR and no mathematical support so all I wrote here is for show theoretical support for IGG is vital. Colin Quinney wrote: > > Hi Rick, > > 2 MV is mentioned more than once so it's probably not a typo. > http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/physics/0209051 > > I'll tell you what I want to see is pictures. We chastised Roschin/Godin for > no pix of their apparatus and I think we should hold Podkletnov et al to the > same standard. Look what JL Naudin has done with pix. Videos even. He's > practically created a small industry of lifters because a pix is worth 1000 > words and a video worth 10 times that again. I'd love to see the gravity > impulse generator in action with a video that can be seen on the Internet as > I'm sure would everybody else! Seeing is believing. Hamdi & John seem to > have some access to the Gravity.org web site so maybe we should politely > request them to put the request for a video to Eugene Podkletnov and > Giovanni Modanese.. (?) > > Colin > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Rick Monteverde" > To: > Sent: Friday, September 13, 2002 5:45 PM > Subject: Re: [jlnlabs] (Info) Investigation of HV discharges in low pressure > gases... > > > I wonder if it really means 2 million volts or if that's a typo. > > > > - Rick Monteverde, > > Honolulu Hawaii > > > > > > >Dear All, > > > > > >You will find a very interesting paper, see below : > > > > > > Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/47998 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: In reply to Frederick Sparber's message of Mon, 16 Sep 2002 05:22:22 -0500: Hi Fred, What's the difference between "Hypocharge" and "magnetic field"? >The String Circle Particle Model or a similar model, David Bergman's Rotating Charge >Circle: > >www.commonsensescience.org > >treats the electron and proton in much the same manner. > >The Relativistically Frame Invariant Charge q = CV = +/- 1.602e-19 coulombs, a >constant for any particle size/mass. > >But, the Hypocharge q' for the proton and q'' for the electron = I/t = q/gamma for the >respective particles comes about by time-dilation of the Displacement Current, >I/gamma. > >However, due to Time-Dilation of the displacement current I = C*dV/dt, where >Time-Dilation = (Fes/Fg)^1/2, at unit separation the particles "see" each other's >Hypocharge in proportion to their own and the other's dilation gamma factor. Hence the >gamma and hypocharge square relationship. > >+/- q' is ~ 1.43e-37 Coulombs for the proton/antiproton particle circle, and +/- q'' >is ~ 7.8e-41 Coulombs for the electron/positron particle circle. > >Thus Fg = G*m1*m2/R^2 = k*q'^2/R^2 or k*q'*q''/R^2. > >k = 1/(4(pi)eo > >Fred Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ Competition provides the motivation, Cooperation provides the means. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Sep 16 22:40:38 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id WAA24437; Mon, 16 Sep 2002 22:39:28 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 22:39:28 -0700 Message-ID: <196301c25e0c$15eb5d00$6401a8c0 cs910664a> Reply-To: "Colin Quinney" From: "Colin Quinney" To: Cc: References: Subject: Re: [jlnlabs] (Info) Investigation of HV discharges in low pressure gases... Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 01:35:51 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH LOGIN at fep04-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com from [24.101.98.221] using ID at Tue, 17 Sep 2002 01:38:41 -0400 Resent-Message-ID: <"U8umx3.0.kz5.G0iXz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/47999 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Hi Keith, and All, This isn't directed at you Keith, but I'm frustrated because my concern is that the whole field of gravity modification and CF is looked upon as such quackery that Western investors cannot grasp the basic concept and belief in the project until (at least) seeing a good video. As an example- Lifters *appear* to be "antigravity" to the uninitiated. The history of electroaerodynamics has been around since the 50's and the patents go back to at least the 30's or 20's, yet "lifters" were not generally believed in until a Web site video of them turned a borderline sceptical crowd into a bunch of believers- who then put up the dollars to replicate, myself included. Seeing IS believing. My initial scepticism disappeared on seeing the videos displayed by Jean-Louis Naudin with his first replication of Transdimensional Technology's Lifter-3. So making the right superconductor will not be a problem when you have 20 or 30 various scientists and engineers around the world attempting a replication after seeing say a Podkletnov video. Of course, the Podkletnov gravity pulse experiment requires serious funding. Human nature (and logic) therefore says all the more reason to "see' it in action. It's harder evidence. Some would say that serious researchers should have nothing to do with the internet and web-cam videos etc., but I would say to them this is either a snobbish attitude or fear of ridicule or fear of theft of intellectual property. To be pragmatic I believe that funding of gravity modification or cold fusion will go a lot farther when videos of the successful experiments are displayed. If not on the Internet, then on television. Television has best impact, next to seeing it in person. And this goes equally for Roshin/Godin, de Aquino, Mills, Correa, etc., and for CF in general. I don't want to wait 100 years for the "right timing". I say to all the successful and serious leading edge researchers, Do your own webcam production, and then invite a TV or film producer or story editor to lunch at your lab. Colin ----- Original Message ----- From: "Keith Nagel" To: "Vortex" ; Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 3:03 PM Subject: RE: [jlnlabs] (Info) Investigation of HV discharges in low pressure gases... > Hi Hamdi, Colin, & All. > > The 2MV stood out for me too, I've worked with 1/2MV DC machines > which were pretty frightening. But you'll notice he's using a > marx bank generator, so the 2MV is impulse and quite do-able. > > One obvious typo is the faraday shield size, 2 cm???? Here he > must mean meters. > > It would be nice to see some pics, but I think he's actually > building these things so I don't miss them. I don't see that > it would help much either to get publicity. Unless he's willing > to provide samples of his SC disks, it would be too difficult > to reproduce. That's where the magic is. All the rest is just > the usual engineering problems. > > My beef is with his velocity measurements. That's a key > piece of information, and it's a lot easier to measure > than he's saying in the paper. Either he needs some > help here, or he's done it and is keeping that bit close > to his vest. I was really hoping to see that in this > paper, it's been something like 6 months now... > > By the way, what a remarkable set of experiments, huh? > I tip my hat to this guy, he's a truely great researcher. > > K. --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.386 / Virus Database: 218 - Release Date: 9/16/2002 From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Sep 17 08:39:34 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id IAA21805; Tue, 17 Sep 2002 08:36:24 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 08:36:24 -0700 Message-ID: <19ba01c25e5f$750c7550$6401a8c0 cs910664a> Reply-To: "Colin Quinney" From: "Colin Quinney" To: Subject: Origin of crop circles baffles scientists Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 11:32:39 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH LOGIN at fep02-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com from [24.101.98.221] using ID at Tue, 17 Sep 2002 11:35:26 -0400 Resent-Message-ID: <"VUX4-.0.bK5.tlqXz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/48000 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: THE PROVIDENCE JOURNAL Leslie Kean: Origin of crop circles baffles scientists 09/16/2002 SAN FRANCISCO SINCE THE RECENT release of the movie Signs, crop circles have been thrust into the limelight. Such major publications as Scientific American and U.S. News and World Report have echoed the common belief that all crop circles are made by stealthy humans flattening plants with boards. This assumption would be fair enough if we had no information suggesting otherwise. However, intriguing data published in peer-reviewed scientific journals clearly establishes that some of these geometric designs, found in dozens of countries, are not made by "pranks with planks." In fact, a study about to be published by a team of scientists and funded by Laurance Rockefeller concludes "it is possible that we are observing the effects of a new or as yet undiscovered energy source." In the early 1990s, biophysicist William C. Levengood, of the Pinelandia Biophysical Laboratory, in Michigan, examined plants and soils from 250 crop formations, randomly selected from seven countries. Samples and controls were provided by the Massachusetts-based BLT Research Team, directed by Nancy Talbott. Levengood, who has published over 50 papers in scientific journals, documented numerous changes in the plants from the formations. Most dramatic were grossly elongated plant nodes (the "knuckles" along the stem) and "expulsion cavities" -- holes literally blown open at the nodes -- caused by the heating of internal moisture from exposure to intense bursts of radiation. The steam inside the stems escaped by either stretching the nodes or, in less elastic tissue, exploding out like a potato bursting open in a microwave oven. Seeds taken from the plants and germinated in the lab showed significant alterations in growth, as compared with controls. Effects varied from an inability to develop seeds to a massive increase in growth rate -- depending on the species, the age of the plants when the circle was created and the intensity of the energy system involved. These anomalies were also found in tufts of standing plants inside crop circles -- clearly not a result of mechanical flattening -- and in patches of randomly downed crops found near the geometric designs. These facts suggested some kind of natural, but unknown, force at work. Published in Physiologia Plantarum (1994), the international journal of the European Societies of Plant Physiology, Levengood's data showed that "plants from crop circles display anatomical alterations which cannot be explained by assuming the formations are hoaxes." He defined a "genuine" formation as one "produced by external energy forces independent of human influence." A strange brown "glaze" covering plants within a British formation was the subject of Levengood and John A. Burke's 1995 paper in the Journal of Scientific Exploration. The material was a pure iron that had been embedded in the plants while the iron was still molten. Tiny iron spheres were also found in the soil. In 1999, British investigator Ronald Ashby examined the glaze through optical and scanning electron microscopes. He determined that intense heat had been involved -- iron melts at about 2,700 degrees Fahrenheit -- administered in millisecond bursts. "After exhaustive inquiry, there is no mundane explanation for the glaze" he concluded. In another paper for Physiologia Plantarum (1999), Levengood and Talbott suggested that the energy causing crop circles could be an atmospheric plasma vortex -- multiple interacting electrified air masses that emit microwaves as they spiral around the earth's magnetic-field lines. Some formations, however, contain cubes and straight lines. Astrophysicist Bernard Haisch, of the California Institute for Physics and Astrophysics, says that such "highly organized, intelligent patterns are not something that could be created by a force of nature." But Haisch points out that since not all formations are tested, it is unknown how many are genuine. Nor is it likely that such complex designs could evolve so quickly in nature. "Natural phenomena make mountain ranges and form continents -- they don't learn geometry in ten years," says Haisch, who is the science editor for the Astrophysical Journal. In 1999, philanthropist Laurance Rockefeller made possible the most definitive -- and most revealing -- study to date. The BLT Research Team collected hundreds of plant and soil samples from a seven-circle barley formation in Edmonton, Canada. The plants had both elongated nodes and expulsion cavities, and the soils contained the peculiar iron spheres, indicating a genuine formation. The controls showed none of these changes. Mineralogist Sampath Iyengar, of the Technology of Materials Laboratory, in California, examined specific heat-sensitive clay minerals in these soils, using X-ray diffraction and a scanning electron microscope. He discovered an increase in the degree of crystallinity (the ordering of atoms) in the circle minerals, which statistician Ravi Raghavan determined was statistically significant at the 95 percent level of confidence. "I was shocked," says Iyengar, a 30-year specialist in clay mineralogy. "These changes are normally found in sediments buried for thousands and thousands of years under rocks, affected by heat and pressure, and not in surface soils." Also astounding was the direct correlation between the node-length increases in the plants and the increased crystallization in the soil minerals -- indicating a common energy source for both effects. Yet the scientists could not explain how this would be possible. The temperature required to alter soil crystallinity would be between 1,500 and 1,800 degrees F. This would destroy the plants. Understanding the possible ramifications of these findings, Talbott sought the expertise of an emeritus professor of geology and mineralogy at Dartmouth College, Robert C. Reynolds Jr., who is former president of the Clay Minerals Society. He is regarded by his colleagues as the "best-known expert in the world" on X-ray diffraction analysis of clay minerals. Reynolds determined that the BLT Team's data had been "obtained by competent personnel, using current equipment." The intense heat required for the observed changes in crystallinity "would have incinerated any plant material present," he confirms in a statement for the Rockefeller report. "In short, I believe that our present knowledge provides no explanation." Meteorologist James W. Deardorff, professor emeritus at the College of Oceanic and Atmospheric Sciences at Oregon State University, and previously a senior scientist at the National Center for Atmospheric Research, states in a 2001 Physiologia Plantarum commentary that the variety, complexity and artistry of crop circles "represent the work of intelligence," and not a plasma vortex. "That is why the hoax hypothesis has been popularly advocated," he says. However, he points out, the anomalous properties in plant stems thoroughly documented by Levengood and Talbott could not possibly have been implemented by hoaxers. Deardorff describes one 1986 British formation in which upper and lower layers of crop were intricately swirled and bent perpendicular to each other, in a fashion that "defies any explanation." "People don't want to face up to this, and scientists have to deal with the ridicule factor," he said in a recent interview. Adding to the puzzle, professional filmmakers have documented bizarre daytime "balls of light" at crop-circle sites. Light phenomena were observed by multiple witnesses at the site of the Canadian circle so meticulously examined under the Rockefeller grant. Eltjo Hasselhoff, a Dutch experimental physicist, has taken on the study of what he describes as "bright, fluorescent flying light objects,sized somewhere between an egg and a football." Scientists face real and serious questions in confronting this mystery. Could this be secret laser technology beamed down from satellites? Is it a natural phenomenon? Is there a consciousness or intelligence directing an energy form yet unknown to us? "To look at the evidence and go away unconvinced is one thing," says astrophysicist Haisch. "To not look at the evidence and be convinced against it . . . is another. That is not science." It's not good journalism, either. Leslie Kean is an investigative reporter and producer with Pacifica Radio based in the San Francisco Bay Area. She can be reached at lkean ix.netcom.net. Online at: http://www.projo.com/opinion/contributors/content/projo_20020916_kean.21cb0. html --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.386 / Virus Database: 218 - Release Date: 9/16/2002 From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Sep 17 09:22:30 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id JAA10764; Tue, 17 Sep 2002 09:19:23 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 09:19:23 -0700 Reply-To: From: "Keith Nagel" To: "Vortex" , "Colin Quinney" Subject: RE: [jlnlabs] (Info) Investigation of HV discharges in low pressure gases... Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 12:34:06 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 In-Reply-To: <196301c25e0c$15eb5d00$6401a8c0 cs910664a> Importance: Normal Resent-Message-ID: <"7mHEs1.0.6e2.BOrXz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/48001 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Hi Colin. >This isn't directed at you Keith, but I'm frustrated because my concern is >that the whole field of gravity modification and CF is looked upon as such >quackery that Western investors cannot grasp the basic concept and belief in >the project until (at least) seeing a good video. Well that's why it's called the fringe, Colin. Want to hear the definition of a pioneer? It's the guy with all the arrows sticking out of his ass (grin). > As an example- Lifters >*appear* to be "antigravity" to the uninitiated. The history of >electroaerodynamics has been around since the 50's and the patents go back >to at least the 30's or 20's, yet "lifters" were not generally believed in >until a Web site video of them turned a borderline sceptical crowd into a >bunch of believers- who then put up the dollars to replicate, myself >included. No one doubts ( or doubted ) that the lifters lift. What's at issue is whether the results need more explaination than simple ionic propulsion. Perhaps you can summarize the best evidence for non-ionic lifting? Also, what's the highest thrust/energy input ratio recorded? Frankly I wouldn't care about the validity of the first claim if it could be shown that the ion engine can be made practical. Certainly great advances have been made in power supplies since the 20's. If the lifter folks are getting anywhere near the thrust I can get from the same energy into an electric motor and prop, then by god we've really got something! >So making the right superconductor >will not be a problem when you have 20 or 30 various scientists and >engineers around the world attempting a replication after seeing say a >Podkletnov video. Oh yes it will be. NASA spent a few million and seemed to have failed miserably. Gene is a materials scientist and has spent his life "cooking" these cakes. I admire the amateur's enthusiasm but question their lack of respect for the scale of the mountain... > I say to all the successful >and serious leading edge researchers, Do your own webcam production, and >then invite a TV or film producer or story editor to lunch at your lab. Good point. Most serious researchers couldn't sell beer in a desert. I agree that some kind of promotional person is essential for fund raising. The university system has professional grant writers. The fringe needs some equivalent. K. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Sep 17 12:21:15 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id MAA01808; Tue, 17 Sep 2002 12:17:21 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 12:17:21 -0700 Message-ID: <1a5e01c25e7e$55491ba0$6401a8c0 cs910664a> Reply-To: "Colin Quinney" From: "Colin Quinney" To: Cc: , References: Subject: Re: [jlnlabs] (Info) Investigation of HV discharges in low pressure gases... Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 15:13:40 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH LOGIN at fep03-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com from [24.101.98.221] using ID at Tue, 17 Sep 2002 15:16:08 -0400 Resent-Message-ID: <"xGPPj3.0.3S.1_tXz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/48002 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Hi Keith, When the Lifter craze started there was much speculation about that. Now it is generally conceded that it is over 99% ion wind. What I was primarily sceptical of was the initial claims of antigravity, even though "I Want to Believe" :-) There is a slight residual thrust noted toward the positive electrode but it is swamped by the ion interactions due to the asymmetric electrode configuration. To the best of my reading, that small residual [toward] positive electrode thrust has been determined to be the difference between (+ - ) ion momentums in air. So there is practically no longer any perceived "anomalous" thrust existing with lifters. Highest thrust/energy input ratio I believe was less than that of an efficient fan. I believe 1/2 that of a helicopter, but that "comparison" does not yet include the weight of the lifter's power supply. The efficiencies however ARE improving monthly, as reported on JL. Naudin's Lists. I believe Jean-Louis could give better stats on that than can I. The Biefield Brown "gravitor" or "gravitator" however, which uses a solid leaky dielectric has not yet been thoroughly investigated. There was an anomalous thrust reported by Brown toward the positive electrode during voltage spikes. This was also reported coinciding with a vacuum spark in the NASA Veritay report. In my opinion however, a definitive *positive* anomalous experiment MUST show net thrust *only* when all the high voltage apparatus has been contained within a tight electrically sealed Faraday cage. Vacuum chamber test for rigor is misleading due to coulomb artifacts from stray ES fields. High vacuum test is therefore unnecessary. I think the main fascination with lifters is first their mystery, and then their appearance, but there is a hard core of serious lifter researchers who continue with experimental variations and they continue to report increased thrust ratios. Also related is a report that increased atmospheric pressure increases that ratio. This means that an "airborne" robot probe in high pressure atmospheres of other planets might be efficient. Batteries and power supplies designs are reportedly becoming more efficient and of less weight. I believe the largest lifter design is now well over 6 feet in diameter and can lift over 600 grams (without PS). I personally believe that the optimal design craft is a rigid delta wing helium or hydrogen balloon with modified lifter design for thrust and the resultant electroaerodynamics effect causing a reduction of atmospheric friction. See Naudin Labs web site for more, and realize of course that development will continue with now almost 100 active researchers combining their efforts and reporting their results.. (..with videos ) Best, Colin ----- Original Message ----- From: "Keith Nagel" To: "Vortex" ; "Colin Quinney" Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 12:34 PM Subject: RE: [jlnlabs] (Info) Investigation of HV discharges in low pressure gases... > Hi Colin. > > >This isn't directed at you Keith, but I'm frustrated because my concern is > >that the whole field of gravity modification and CF is looked upon as such > >quackery that Western investors cannot grasp the basic concept and belief > in > >the project until (at least) seeing a good video. > > Well that's why it's called the fringe, Colin. Want to hear > the definition of a pioneer? It's the guy with all the arrows sticking > out of his ass (grin). > > > As an example- Lifters > >*appear* to be "antigravity" to the uninitiated. The history of > >electroaerodynamics has been around since the 50's and the patents go back > >to at least the 30's or 20's, yet "lifters" were not generally believed in > >until a Web site video of them turned a borderline sceptical crowd into a > >bunch of believers- who then put up the dollars to replicate, myself > >included. > > No one doubts ( or doubted ) that the lifters lift. What's at issue is > whether the > results need more explaination than simple ionic propulsion. Perhaps > you can summarize the best evidence for non-ionic lifting? Also, > what's the highest thrust/energy input ratio recorded? Frankly > I wouldn't care about the validity of the first claim if it could > be shown that the ion engine can be made practical. Certainly > great advances have been made in power supplies since the 20's. > If the lifter folks are getting anywhere near the thrust I can > get from the same energy into an electric motor and prop, then > by god we've really got something! > > >So making the right superconductor > >will not be a problem when you have 20 or 30 various scientists and > >engineers around the world attempting a replication after seeing say a > >Podkletnov video. > > Oh yes it will be. NASA spent a few million and seemed to have > failed miserably. Gene is a materials scientist and has spent > his life "cooking" these cakes. I admire the amateur's enthusiasm > but question their lack of respect for the scale of the mountain... > > > I say to all the successful > >and serious leading edge researchers, Do your own webcam production, and > >then invite a TV or film producer or story editor to lunch at your lab. > > Good point. Most serious researchers couldn't sell beer in a desert. > I agree that some kind of promotional person is essential for fund > raising. The university system has professional grant writers. > The fringe needs some equivalent. > > K. > --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.386 / Virus Database: 218 - Release Date: 9/16/2002 From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Sep 17 13:37:20 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id NAA10031; Tue, 17 Sep 2002 13:35:17 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 13:35:17 -0700 From: FZNIDARSIC aol.com Message-ID: <3c.245a3e6a.2ab8ebdd aol.com> Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 16:34:37 EDT Subject: znidarsic's 2000 ANS lecture To: vortex-l eskimo.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_3c.245a3e6a.2ab8ebdd_boundary" X-Mailer: AOL 7.0 for Windows US sub 10634 Resent-Message-ID: <"8_PwQ.0.fS2.48vXz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/48003 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: --part1_3c.245a3e6a.2ab8ebdd_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit http://www.angelfire.com/scifi2/zpt/chaptere.html Enjoy Frank Znidarsic --part1_3c.245a3e6a.2ab8ebdd_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit http://www.angelfire.com/scifi2/zpt/chaptere.html

Enjoy

Frank Znidarsic
--part1_3c.245a3e6a.2ab8ebdd_boundary-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Sep 17 18:55:49 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id SAA14520; Tue, 17 Sep 2002 18:54:40 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 18:54:40 -0700 Message-ID: <1c2001c25eb5$d7a8ca50$6401a8c0 cs910664a> Reply-To: "Colin Quinney" From: "Colin Quinney" To: Subject: Chernetski Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 21:51:01 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH LOGIN at fep03-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com from [24.101.98.221] using ID at Tue, 17 Sep 2002 21:53:29 -0400 Resent-Message-ID: <"miO973.0.XY3.TpzXz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/48004 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: To All, What ever happened with Chernetski and the research he was doing with anomalous momentum or anomalous developed power flow from positive ion flow with his plasma research? He was (is) a Russian researcher working with plasma containment in fusion reactors and the story reminded me a bit about Tesla blowing out a generator. PACE did a story on him several years ago but I have heard nothing since. Colin --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.386 / Virus Database: 218 - Release Date: 9/16/2002 From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Sep 17 19:14:20 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id TAA24276; Tue, 17 Sep 2002 19:13:05 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 19:13:05 -0700 Message-ID: <34bc01c25eb8$6c876080$6401a8c0 cs910664a> Reply-To: "Colin Quinney" From: "Colin Quinney" To: Subject: Fw: [jlnlabs] (Info) Investigation of HV discharges in low pressure gases... Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 22:09:30 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH LOGIN at fep01-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com from [24.101.98.221] using ID at Tue, 17 Sep 2002 22:12:20 -0400 Resent-Message-ID: <"TV0zD2.0.Ex5.m4-Xz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/48005 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: REPOST Hi Keith and All, When the Lifter craze started there was much speculation about that. Now it is generally conceded that it is over 99% ion wind. What I was primarily sceptical of was the initial claims of antigravity, even though "I Want to Believe" :-) There is a slight residual thrust noted toward the positive electrode but it is swamped by the ion interactions due to the asymmetric electrode configuration. To the best of my reading, that small residual [toward] positive electrode thrust has been determined to be the difference between (+ - ) ion momentums in air. So there is practically no longer any perceived "anomalous" thrust existing with lifters. Highest thrust/energy input ratio I believe was less than that of an efficient fan. I believe 1/2 that of a helicopter, but that "comparison" does not yet include the weight of the lifter's power supply. The efficiencies however ARE improving monthly, as reported on JL. Naudin's Lists. I believe Jean-Louis could give better stats on that than can I. The Biefield Brown "gravitor" or "gravitator" however, which uses a solid leaky dielectric has not yet been thoroughly investigated. There was an anomalous thrust reported by Brown toward the positive electrode during voltage spikes. This was also reported coinciding with a vacuum spark in the NASA Veritay report. In my opinion however, a definitive *positive* anomalous experiment MUST show net thrust *only* when all the high voltage apparatus has been contained within a tight electrically sealed Faraday cage. Vacuum chamber test for rigor is misleading due to coulomb artifacts from stray ES fields. High vacuum test is therefore unnecessary and misleading. I think the main fascination with lifters is first their mystery, and then their appearance, but there is a hard core of serious lifter researchers who continue with experimental variations and they continue to report increased thrust ratios. Also related is a report that increased atmospheric pressure increases that ratio. This means that an "airborne" robot probe in high pressure atmospheres of other planets might be efficient. Batteries and power supplies designs by Lifer researchers are reportedly becoming more efficient and of less weight. I believe the largest lifter design is now well over 6 feet in diameter and can lift over 600 grams (without PS). I personally believe that the optimal design craft is a rigid delta wing helium or hydrogen balloon with modified lifter design for thrust and the resultant electroaerodynamics effect causing a reduction of atmospheric friction. See Naudin Labs web site for more, and realize of course that development will continue with now almost 100 active researchers combining their efforts and reporting their results.. (..with videos ) Best, Colin --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.386 / Virus Database: 218 - Release Date: 9/16/2002 From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Sep 19 02:31:27 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id CAA18045; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 02:30:25 -0700 Resent-Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 02:30:25 -0700 Message-Id: <4.3.1.20020918174700.00bc3800 pop3.newnet.co.uk> X-Sender: lawrence pop3.newnet.co.uk X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3 Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 17:48:57 +0100 To: "vortex-l eskimo.com" From: Stephen Lawrence Subject: Hello, South Africa Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <"J3LYc3.0.sP4.maPYz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/48006 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Dear Vortexians, is there anyone living in S. Africra within range of Jonnesburg? I'd like to link up with you Best Regards, Stephen Lawrence, Committee for Future Energies. Stephen Lawrence, 8 Supanee Court, French's Road, Cambridge, England, CB4 3LB. Tel/Fax +44 1223 564373 From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Sep 19 07:29:21 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id HAA31905; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 07:27:52 -0700 Resent-Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 07:27:52 -0700 X-Sent: 19 Sep 2002 14:27:48 GMT Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20020919101739.00ae2cf8 mail.DIRECTVInternet.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell mail.DIRECTVInternet.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 10:27:29 -0400 To: vortex-L eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: LENR.org relocated, papers available again soon Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <"6dZyV3.0.Ro7.dxTYz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/48007 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Greetings all. We have relocated the LENR.org collection of papers on cold fusion to a new site: http://lenr-canr.org/ (We had to change the name for reasons beyond our control.) The new site came on line this morning, but I have not yet uploaded the papers. I am busy cleaning up and renaming the files, preparing the new index system, and converting the Abstracts to HTML. Here is the blurb now uploaded at the new site: This site features a collection of papers on LENR, Low Energy Nuclear Reactions, also known as Cold Fusion. (CANR, Chemically Assisted Nuclear Reactions, is another term for this phenomenon.) We are in the process of combining this material with the conference site for the upcoming Tenth International Conference on Cold Fusion (ICCF10.org). We are reorganizing the papers and preparing some new features including: * The ICCF-10 First Announcement and Call for Pre-registration, allowing pre-registration on line. * An extensive bibliography of nearly 3,000 papers about LENR. * Downloadable copies of the bibliography in EndNote and RIS formats. * An improved index system closely integrated with the bibliography, showing papers available for download and other papers by the same author. * A list of co-authors and key words for each paper in the bibliography. * Abstracts for some of the papers we are not able to upload. * More papers, photographs of laboratories and equipment, poster session material, and more. We hope to re-open this site for downloads in a few days. Sorry for any inconvenience. - Jed Rothwell, September 16, 2002 From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Sep 19 09:44:38 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id JAA31264; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 09:43:49 -0700 Resent-Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 09:43:49 -0700 Message-ID: <02a201c25ffb$38c04570$6401a8c0 cs910664a> Reply-To: "Colin Quinney" From: "Colin Quinney" To: References: <3c.245a3e6a.2ab8ebdd aol.com> Subject: Re: znidarsic's 2000 ANS lecture Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 12:40:10 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_029F_01C25FD9.B163B9C0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH LOGIN at fep04-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com from [24.101.98.221] using ID at Thu, 19 Sep 2002 12:42:58 -0400 Resent-Message-ID: <"74bL83.0.De7.3xVYz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/48008 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_029F_01C25FD9.B163B9C0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Frank, Good lecture :-) and thank you for sharing it with us. The slides were = a bit slow coming into view but I "got it" after they appeared. I have a report here somewhere about superconductivity creeping into = various plasmas and I'm wondering what would happen if we = electromagnetically rotated a plasma with phased coils on say mercury = vapour lights or one of those halogen street lights at the critical = frequency. What do we know about where superconductivity appears.. = Superconductivity is reported in more than cryolabs. There are also = reports of organic superconductivity. Sorry no reference, but has to do = with neuron cells I believe. It might explain some unusual levitations = by fakirs, saints etc..=20 Colin ----- Original Message -----=20 From: FZNIDARSIC aol.com=20 To: vortex-l eskimo.com=20 Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 4:34 PM Subject: znidarsic's 2000 ANS lecture http://www.angelfire.com/scifi2/zpt/chaptere.html=20 Enjoy=20 Frank Znidarsic=20 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.389 / Virus Database: 220 - Release Date: 9/17/2002 ------=_NextPart_000_029F_01C25FD9.B163B9C0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 
Hi Frank,
 
Good lecture :-)  and = thank you for sharing it with us. The slides were a bit slow = coming into=20 view but I "got it" after they appeared.
 
I have a report here somewhere = about=20 superconductivity creeping into various plasmas and I'm wondering = what=20 would happen if we  electromagnetically rotated a plasma with = phased coils=20 on say mercury vapour lights or one of those halogen street lights at = the=20 critical frequency. What do we know about where superconductivity = appears..=20 Superconductivity is reported in more than cryolabs. There are also = reports of=20 organic superconductivity. Sorry no reference, but has to do with neuron = cells I=20 believe. It might explain some unusual levitations by fakirs, saints = etc..=20
 
Colin
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 FZNIDARSIC@aol.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, = 2002 4:34=20 PM
Subject: znidarsic's 2000 ANS=20 lecture

http://www.ang= elfire.com/scifi2/zpt/chaptere.html=20

Enjoy

Frank Znidarsic
 

---
Outgoing = mail is=20 certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: = 6.0.389=20 / Virus Database: 220 - Release Date:=20 9/17/2002
------=_NextPart_000_029F_01C25FD9.B163B9C0-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Sep 20 14:41:01 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id OAA02993; Fri, 20 Sep 2002 14:35:42 -0700 Resent-Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 14:35:42 -0700 Message-ID: <3D8B9571.42D9D5C5 ix.netcom.com> Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 14:38:57 -0700 From: Akira Kawasaki X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en]C-CCK-MCD NSCPCD472 (Win95; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Vortex Subject: [Fwd: What's New for Sep 20, 2002] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"-lLC43.0.gk.kIvYz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/48009 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: -------- Original Message -------- Subject: What's New for Sep 20, 2002 Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 17:00:39 -0400 (EDT) From: "What's New" To: aki ix.netcom.com WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 20 Sep 02 Washington, DC 1. INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION: "HOUSTON, WE HAVE A PROBLEM." If you don't get the answer you want, the theory goes, just appoint another panel. It's not working. The latest look at the ISS as a place to do scientific research is by a National Research Council panel. The Task Group on Research on the International Space Station found just what all the other panels found: 1) The ISS is not shaping up to be a world-class research facility, 2) the scientific community has shown little interest in using the space station to conduct research, and 3) NASA's primary goal for the use of the Space Station has never been made clear. This may sound shocking for a research facility that's expected to eat up more than $100B, but it shouldn't be a surprise. As long ago as 1990, the Advisory Committee on the Future of the US Space Program, headed by Norm Augustine, called for drastic rethinking of the Space Station: "We do not believe the space station can be justified on the basis of the science it can perform" (WN 14 Dec 90). Almost the same words were echoed in a statement adopted by the Council of the American Physical Society (WN 25 Jan 91). The biologists made the same point (WN 17 Jul 98). But it was France's Space Minister, who said it all: "It is expensive, it no longer makes people dream, and is has no scientific value." He said he would not be surprised to see it scrapped (WN 26 Jun 98). 2. WEAPONS DETECTION: MORE COMPLICATED THAN WE (OR ABC) IMAGINED. Last week's WN told the story of ABC News "smuggling" a mock bomb into the country. The "bomb" contained 15 pounds of depleted uranium (DU). WN scoffed at suggestions that that this was a "perfect mock-up." WN pointed out that U-235 in highly enriched uranium (HEU)is more radioactive than U-238, which is strictly true, but more expert readers gently suggested there was more to the story. Gamma rays from 235 are of much lower energy, and most are absorbed by the uranium itself. So DU is more easily detected than HEU? Probably not. Most HEU is contaminated with U-232, a highly radioactive isotope with a daughter that emits an easily detected gamma. So HEU is more easily detected than DU? Not necessarily. The U-232 contamination comes from the use of reprocessed uranium. South African and Pakistani HEU is produced from virgin uranium and should contain no U-232. Our thanks to Steve Fetter for educating us on the realities of life in 2002. 3. WHERE NOW? SLAKEY COMPLETES THE ASCENT OF THE SEVEN SUMMITS. Physicist Francis Slakey, our colleague in the Washington Office of the APS, has returned from his 12 Aug 02 summit of Carstenz Pyramid, Irian Jaya, Indonesia, the highest peak in Oceania. He has now climbed the highest mountains on all seven continents, one of only 70 climbers in history to have done so. In that unstable region, the obstacles of the climb paled before the hazards of bribing his way through bands of armed civilians. THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND and THE AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY Opinions are the author's, and are not necessarily shared by the University or the American Physical Society, but they should be. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Sep 20 14:45:05 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id OAA06848; Fri, 20 Sep 2002 14:43:27 -0700 Resent-Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 14:43:27 -0700 From: obergmann owc.com Subject: REMOVE ---- Re: [Fwd: What's New for Sep 20, 2002] To: vortex-l eskimo.com Cc: Vortex X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.8 June 18, 2001 Message-ID: Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 17:39:20 -0400 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on USNOTES1/OWC(Release 5.0.10 |March 22, 2002) at 09/20/2002 05:40:01 PM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Resent-Message-ID: <"geVq7.0.wg1.-PvYz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/48010 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Please remove me from your mailing list. Akira Kawasaki om> cc: Subject: [Fwd: What's New for Sep 20, 2002] 09/20/02 02:38 PM MST Please respond to vortex-l -------- Original Message -------- Subject: What's New for Sep 20, 2002 Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 17:00:39 -0400 (EDT) From: "What's New" To: aki ix.netcom.com WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 20 Sep 02 Washington, DC 1. INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION: "HOUSTON, WE HAVE A PROBLEM." If you don't get the answer you want, the theory goes, just appoint another panel. It's not working. The latest look at the ISS as a place to do scientific research is by a National Research Council panel. The Task Group on Research on the International Space Station found just what all the other panels found: 1) The ISS is not shaping up to be a world-class research facility, 2) the scientific community has shown little interest in using the space station to conduct research, and 3) NASA's primary goal for the use of the Space Station has never been made clear. This may sound shocking for a research facility that's expected to eat up more than $100B, but it shouldn't be a surprise. As long ago as 1990, the Advisory Committee on the Future of the US Space Program, headed by Norm Augustine, called for drastic rethinking of the Space Station: "We do not believe the space station can be justified on the basis of the science it can perform" (WN 14 Dec 90). Almost the same words were echoed in a statement adopted by the Council of the American Physical Society (WN 25 Jan 91). The biologists made the same point (WN 17 Jul 98). But it was France's Space Minister, who said it all: "It is expensive, it no longer makes people dream, and is has no scientific value." He said he would not be surprised to see it scrapped (WN 26 Jun 98). 2. WEAPONS DETECTION: MORE COMPLICATED THAN WE (OR ABC) IMAGINED. Last week's WN told the story of ABC News "smuggling" a mock bomb into the country. The "bomb" contained 15 pounds of depleted uranium (DU). WN scoffed at suggestions that that this was a "perfect mock-up." WN pointed out that U-235 in highly enriched uranium (HEU)is more radioactive than U-238, which is strictly true, but more expert readers gently suggested there was more to the story. Gamma rays from 235 are of much lower energy, and most are absorbed by the uranium itself. So DU is more easily detected than HEU? Probably not. Most HEU is contaminated with U-232, a highly radioactive isotope with a daughter that emits an easily detected gamma. So HEU is more easily detected than DU? Not necessarily. The U-232 contamination comes from the use of reprocessed uranium. South African and Pakistani HEU is produced from virgin uranium and should contain no U-232. Our thanks to Steve Fetter for educating us on the realities of life in 2002. 3. WHERE NOW? SLAKEY COMPLETES THE ASCENT OF THE SEVEN SUMMITS. Physicist Francis Slakey, our colleague in the Washington Office of the APS, has returned from his 12 Aug 02 summit of Carstenz Pyramid, Irian Jaya, Indonesia, the highest peak in Oceania. He has now climbed the highest mountains on all seven continents, one of only 70 climbers in history to have done so. In that unstable region, the obstacles of the climb paled before the hazards of bribing his way through bands of armed civilians. THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND and THE AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY Opinions are the author's, and are not necessarily shared by the University or the American Physical Society, but they should be. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Sep 20 15:40:56 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id PAA32668; Fri, 20 Sep 2002 15:35:05 -0700 Resent-Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 15:35:05 -0700 Message-ID: <3D8BA300.5030405 rtpatlanta.com> Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 18:36:48 -0400 From: "Terry Blanton" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com, obergmann@owc.com Subject: Re: REMOVE References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"dnqrD2.0.J-7.OAwYz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/48011 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: obergmann owc.com wrote: >Please remove me from your mailing list. > To be removed from the mailing list, simply send a blank message to: vortex-l-request eskimo.com with the word 'unsubscribe' in the subject. Terry From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Sep 20 20:08:05 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id UAA14616; Fri, 20 Sep 2002 20:01:16 -0700 Resent-Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 20:01:16 -0700 X-Sent: 21 Sep 2002 03:01:09 GMT Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20020920224705.02be4798 mail.DIRECTVInternet.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell mail.DIRECTVInternet.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 23:01:09 -0400 To: vortex-L eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: Prototype LENR-CANR bibliography open to review Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <"DjvHj3.0.9a3.x3-Yz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/48012 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: This is still a little rocky, but the prototype version of the new LENR-CANR bibliography of papers is open for comment here: http://members.directvinternet.com/jedrothwell/ Select "TEST BIBLIOGRAPHY" at top of page. The third item is a mockup with only a few test data. This is kind of a unique approach to presenting an index on Internet. I tried to make it look more like a bibliography in a paper than a computer database. This is a simple set of linked HTML documents with lots of hyperlinks. No document is larger 246 KB, to keep loading time down. Perhaps I should make that ~100 KB. The documents are generated with a Pascal program that accesses data provided by Ed Storms. He maintains the database with a nifty program called "EndNote." We will provide copies of the database in EndNote format for downloading. This prototype is the biggest file. We will also show a much shorter list of authors with papers on file. There should be ~60 papers soon -- as soon as I get back to doing real work. The rest of the preparation for the LENR-CANR reopening is secretarial work and mindless web design, which is mostly done. I hope to go on line in a few more days. I would particularly welcome critiques and suggestions now. The alphabetical list of authors is so long it is awkward. I plan to do something about that. There are 1,462 authors. - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Sep 21 07:46:13 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id HAA06876; Sat, 21 Sep 2002 07:44:55 -0700 Resent-Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2002 07:44:55 -0700 Message-ID: <3D8C7A16.97AF7BA7 ix.netcom.com> Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2002 07:54:31 -0600 From: Edmund Storms X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 (Macintosh; U; PPC) X-Accept-Language: en,pdf MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Prototype LENR-CANR bibliography open to review References: <5.1.0.14.2.20020920224705.02be4798 mail.DIRECTVInternet.com> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------5C66D6E5122C16423E4828B2" Resent-Message-ID: <"dRTX_1.0.Mh1.cN8Zz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/48013 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------5C66D6E5122C16423E4828B2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Jed Rothwell wrote: > This is still a little rocky, but the prototype version of the new > LENR-CANR bibliography of papers is open for comment here: Jed, the "Download" button has no color. Programing code appears in the reference window before it is filled by the references. Other than that, it looks good. Ed > > > http://members.directvinternet.com/jedrothwell/ > > Select "TEST BIBLIOGRAPHY" at top of page. The third item is a mockup with > only a few test data. > > This is kind of a unique approach to presenting an index on Internet. I > tried to make it look more like a bibliography in a paper than a computer > database. > > This is a simple set of linked HTML documents with lots of hyperlinks. No > document is larger 246 KB, to keep loading time down. Perhaps I should make > that ~100 KB. The documents are generated with a Pascal program that > accesses data provided by Ed Storms. He maintains the database with a nifty > program called "EndNote." We will provide copies of the database in EndNote > format for downloading. > > This prototype is the biggest file. We will also show a much shorter list > of authors with papers on file. There should be ~60 papers soon -- as soon > as I get back to doing real work. > > The rest of the preparation for the LENR-CANR reopening is secretarial work > and mindless web design, which is mostly done. I hope to go on line in a > few more days. I would particularly welcome critiques and suggestions now. > > The alphabetical list of authors is so long it is awkward. I plan to do > something about that. There are 1,462 authors. > > - Jed --------------5C66D6E5122C16423E4828B2 Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii; name="storms2.vcf" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Description: Card for Edmund Storms Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="storms2.vcf" begin:vcard n:; tel;work:505 988 3673 x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:http://home.netcom.com/~storms2/index.html org:Energy K. System adr:;;2140 Paseo Ponderosa;Santa Fe;NM;87501;http://home.netcom.com/~storms2/index.html version:2.1 email;internet:storms2 ix.netcom.com x-mozilla-cpt:;1 fn:Edmund Storms end:vcard --------------5C66D6E5122C16423E4828B2-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Sep 21 12:40:51 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id MAA16169; Sat, 21 Sep 2002 12:33:36 -0700 Resent-Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2002 12:33:36 -0700 Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2002 15:34:06 -0400 (EDT) From: John Schnurer To: "Bruce A. Perreault" cc: Vortex Subject: Reich's Vacor Tube & Correa's Tube In-Reply-To: <3D873841.3443 cyberportal.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Resent-Message-ID: <"U5Rpi2.0.Ry3.FcCZz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/48014 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Dear Bruce and People, I again thank Bruce for bringing important older texts to our attention and allowing us to see actual page representations. It may help if the terms in the book can be put in context. This may be easier for all of us to determine if we have more of the text on the topic than what is shown. It is also probably OK to mention: Sir Frederick William Herschel noted the action of Infrared Light in 1800. According to some biographers he is the first. I do not believe this "proves" for an instant that Herschel is the first and it certainly bears better and more accurate investigation to ascertain who the "first" to pin down IR may be. We can probably be fairly sure Gustav le Bon, or Gus The Good is NOT the first to "discover" IR..... as he lived from 1841 to 1931 and was not yet born when Herschel when Sir Fred made his observations on the topic. The study of The History and Ethics of Science and Technology bears every bit as much caution as the study of nearly any type of history.... When you link Ethics and History matters become interesting and when you direct this pair toward the sciences and the development of technologies then some very interesting bits come from illuminating a series of fields of endeavor which are strongly tied to Money, Prestige and whole campuses and big buildings and several so-called "laws" which are adhered to some "name". Maybe Bruce would like to see future physics texts with entries about the Perreault Principle. with best regards, JH On Tue, 17 Sep 2002, Bruce A. Perreault wrote: > Hello Everyone! > > William Reich's Vacor Tube that powered the > "orgone motor force" and the Correa's Pulsed > Discharge tube both required aluminum in > their construction. I wonder if Chernetsky's > tube also used aluminum. Here is a couple of > pages from Le Bon's Evolution of Forces that > you should find interesting... > > http://www.nuenergy.org/LeBonForces298to299.htm > > Notice that aluminum is the most radioactive > out of all the metals? Is this the "Y-factor" > that Reich was keeping a secret? > > Le Bon goes on to demonstrate an invisible light > that matter emits. He calls it "black light". > We now call it infra-red light. Le Bon was the > first to discover this wavelength of light. Was > this the orgone radiation? Could it be that > when a vacor tube is soaked in infra-red light > (orgone energy) that its aluminum plates release > radioactive gas that is the cause of the motor > force? This makes sense to me. How about to you? > > This is probly the reason why Reich stated that > aluminum should not be used in the construction > of his orgone energy accumulators because this > metal releases too much nuclear radiation. > > > -Bruce A. Perreault > > > > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> > Sell a Home for Top $ > http://us.click.yahoo.com/RrPZMC/jTmEAA/ySSFAA/FGYolB/TM > ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> > > Messages archives at : > > http://www.egroups.com/group/jlnlabs/ > > To unsubscribe, send a blank email to jlnlabs-unsubscribe egroups.com > > JLN Labs web site at: http://go.to/jlnlabs > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Sep 21 12:49:01 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id MAA20730; Sat, 21 Sep 2002 12:47:57 -0700 Resent-Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2002 12:47:57 -0700 Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2002 15:48:29 -0400 (EDT) From: John Schnurer To: "Bruce A. Perreault" cc: Vortex Subject: Strange test result from Moray Semiconductor In-Reply-To: <3D8A1747.28AE cyberportal.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Resent-Message-ID: <"Vvf9w.0.q35.jpCZz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/48015 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Dear Bruce and people, Again we laud Bruce for bringing new and interesting information to light. Bruce: Can you please let us know some simple details of the experimental set up? A) Specifically: What is being used to measure resistance and how is the device connected? What is the range of change in resistance? What is the distance between the probes? Are the probes mechanically fixed in place? What are some examples of other variables the material has been exposed to? For example an answer may be something such as: The resistance is measured by a Fluke digital volt meter or DVM model 2230 and the resistance begins at 7.78 meg ohms and changes to 7.76 meg ohms. The finger begins 150 cm away and ends 2 mm away. The probes are alligator clips and are positioned 2 mm apart on a small example of the metal 7 mm by 22 mm. Description of energy the material has been exposed to include: ???? Why is the material though to be a semiconductor? Can you show a photo of the experimental set up for this important work indicating finger energy? ________________ On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Bruce A. Perreault wrote: > Hello All! > > I have exposed the surface of a semiconductor > that I obtained from one of the broken Moray > tubes to all sorts of energy, including > radioactivity. Non of which caused the material > to react except for one. When my finger approaches > the surface its resistance goes lower. At first I > thought that the reaction might be caused by heat > from my finger. However, when approached with a > lighted match-stick there is no effect at all. > Only the energy from one of my fingers will trigger > the response. I have tried my arm, wrist and tongue... > The effect only occurs at the tips of my fingers. > > -Bruce A. Perreault > > > > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> > 4 DVDs Free +s&p Join Now > http://us.click.yahoo.com/pt6YBB/NXiEAA/ySSFAA/FGYolB/TM > ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> > > Messages archives at : > > http://www.egroups.com/group/jlnlabs/ > > To unsubscribe, send a blank email to jlnlabs-unsubscribe egroups.com > > JLN Labs web site at: http://go.to/jlnlabs > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Sep 21 14:02:46 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id OAA13757; Sat, 21 Sep 2002 14:01:38 -0700 Resent-Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2002 14:01:38 -0700 X-Originating-IP: [209.249.70.129] From: "Mark Goldes" To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Strange test result from Moray Semiconductor - ZOTZ! Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2002 14:01:04 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Sep 2002 21:01:05.0058 (UTC) FILETIME=[FFEC5820:01C261B1] Resent-Message-ID: <"1oM5-1.0.tM3.nuDZz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/48016 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: This reminds me of a hilarious book called ZOTZ! It was published about the time of WWII. Whenever any extremity of the body of the fellow who had this power was aimed at anything, a powerful ray was emitted. I'll leave to your imaginations the implications. Sorry to smile at what seems like serious stuff, but it triggered memories! Mark >From: John Schnurer >Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com >To: "Bruce A. Perreault" >CC: Vortex >Subject: Strange test result from Moray Semiconductor >Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2002 15:48:29 -0400 (EDT) > > > > Dear Bruce and people, > > Again we laud Bruce for bringing new and interesting information >to light. > > Bruce: > > Can you please let us know some simple details of the experimental >set up? > > A) Specifically: > > What is being used to measure resistance and how is the > device connected? > What is the range of change in resistance? > What is the distance between the probes? > Are the probes mechanically fixed in place? > What are some examples of other variables the material > has been exposed to? > > For example an answer may be something such as: > > The resistance is measured by a Fluke digital volt meter or DVM >model 2230 and the resistance begins at 7.78 meg ohms and changes to 7.76 >meg ohms. The finger begins 150 cm away and ends 2 mm away. > > The probes are alligator clips and are positioned 2 mm apart on a >small example of the metal 7 mm by 22 mm. > > Description of energy the material has been exposed to include: > > ???? > > Why is the material though to be a semiconductor? > Can you show a photo of the experimental set up for this important >work indicating finger energy? > > > ________________ > >On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Bruce A. Perreault wrote: > > > Hello All! > > > > I have exposed the surface of a semiconductor > > that I obtained from one of the broken Moray > > tubes to all sorts of energy, including > > radioactivity. Non of which caused the material > > to react except for one. When my finger approaches > > the surface its resistance goes lower. At first I > > thought that the reaction might be caused by heat > > from my finger. However, when approached with a > > lighted match-stick there is no effect at all. > > Only the energy from one of my fingers will trigger > > the response. I have tried my arm, wrist and tongue... > > The effect only occurs at the tips of my fingers. > > > > -Bruce A. Perreault > > > > > > > > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> > > 4 DVDs Free +s&p Join Now > > http://us.click.yahoo.com/pt6YBB/NXiEAA/ySSFAA/FGYolB/TM > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> > > > > Messages archives at : > > > > http://www.egroups.com/group/jlnlabs/ > > > > To unsubscribe, send a blank email to jlnlabs-unsubscribe egroups.com > > > > JLN Labs web site at: http://go.to/jlnlabs > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to >http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > > > _________________________________________________________________ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Sep 24 04:38:32 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id EAA12661; Tue, 24 Sep 2002 04:37:11 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 04:37:11 -0700 Message-ID: <000001c263b6$2d978e60$6d09bf3f computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: Cc: , , , , Subject: Re: Relaxation Oscillator Antigravity? Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 05:21:31 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Resent-Message-ID: <"qJ7992.0.k53.dv4az" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/48017 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: The run-of-the-mill relaxation oscillator circuits ignore the Vacuum Inductance (Lv) (12.57e-7 henry/meter times electrode spacing)and Capacitance (Cv) (8.85e-12 farad/meter times electrode spacing) between the electrodes of the gas discharge device whether it is an Ne-2-type glow lamp, spark plug, or carbon arc electrodes. http://home.earthlink.net/~lenyr/arcosc.htm http://www.du.edu/~etuttle/electron/elect10.htm http://isaac.exploratorium.edu/~pauld/summer_institute/summer_day15current/Neontubes.h tml http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electronic/relaxo.html The vacuum capacitance (Cv) is being charged at a rate determined by t = 377 * Cv and the inductance at a rate t = L/377 where 377 is the intrinsic impedance of the vacuum (ohms). However, when the discharge of this "LC Tank Circuit" occurs, the capacitance Cv is discharged at a rate t = R * Cv and the inductance Lv at a rate t = Lv/R where R is the resistance of the gas discharge. >From this it can be seen that t = R * Cv is much shorter than t = Lv/R. The String-Circle Particle Model suggests that the current due to Lv/377 sets up a "Hypocharge" q' that Time-Dilates (due to accelerated frame phenomena) to a value q/gamma = q' (gamma = (Fes/Fg)^1/2 ) which is responsible for the gravity field independent (oblivious) of the charge q = CV (1.6e-19 coulombs) that is responsible for the strong force and the Electrostatic-electromagnetic forces in nature, thus any material is transparent to this gravity field except for the k*q'^2/r^2 gravity force acting between the q' charges in the materials. >From this conjecture it is possible that the current pulses created during discharge of the vacuum inductance Lv between the electrodes of gas discharge devices can create an undilated charge q' = I * t that can attract or repel the q' of the earth's gravity field ( ~ 5.15e14 coulombs) with a force: F = Fg = G*m^2/r^2 = 9e9*q'^2/r^2 where r is the radius of the earth 6.38e6 meters. Three such relaxation oscillators spaced 120 degrees apart around the perimeter of a spacecraft might get it off the ground along with "flashing multi-colored lights" and RFI Noise and all. :-) Regards, Frederick From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Sep 25 08:22:02 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id IAA18492; Wed, 25 Sep 2002 08:18:35 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 08:18:35 -0700 Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 08:16:23 -0700 From: Jones Beene Subject: Re: Has ET arrived? To: vortex Message-id: <001401c264a6$82f77780$0a016ea8 cpq> MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 Content-type: text/plain; charset=Windows-1252 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-priority: Normal Resent-Message-ID: <"OBGjN.0.nW4.BFTaz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/48018 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: ***Contra-spin #2**** Last week a story appeared in the science press that could be construed (at least by any good conspiracy theorist) as an attempt by authorities to put a casual "by-the-way" kind of non-alarming spin on the fact that for the past several months, an object that could be contrued (at least by any good conspiracy theorist) as an extra-terrestrial vehicle of some kind has been mysteriously "parked" in earth orbit ;-) Officials at NASA were careful not to call it anything except "space junk" since it is a manufactured object rather than an asteroid - and just today they are claiming that the object, designated as "JOO2E3" is probably the long-lost third stage of the Apollo 12 rocket that took astronauts to the moon in 1969 - in other words, the most obvious remnant of perhaps the most important human accomplishment of all time. Cheers to the NASA spin doctors, at least so far (and a nice self-congratulatory touch un mentioning Apollo 12). But there are a few little gaps in the official story. Here are a couple. Perhaps you can think of a few more gaps in the official spin by giving a closer reading to the story at: http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,55364,00.html First, if "JOO2E3" is just junk and not an alarming object, why waste the valuable resources of Hubble with hours of unscheduled viewing time? And BTW, does anyone believe that Hubble could NOT get an extremely good view of this thing? Here is the official spin on that little problem -"Although JOO2E3 can be seen by amateur astronomers using 8- to 10-inch telescopes, high-tech scopes like NASA's Hubble Space Telescope couldn't conclusively identify it. The Hubble's 2.4-meter diameter mirror is limited to capturing images of objects no smaller than 80 meters across. J002E3 is, at best, about 30 meters across." And, BTW what about all those CIA high tech spy telescopes - couldn't they get a decent view - or are they too busy looking for Sadaam or Osama? What is revealing here is what is NOT said. IF the USA has the technology to view this object clearly from space, then we should assume that they have already done so, given the security implications - and furthermore, if they have done so and won't categorically state that the object is really nothing more than "space junk" then it is at least plausible that it is something else. Second small problem with official spin. "University of Arizona astronomers measured the spectrum of sunlight reflected from J002E3 and found the colors were consistent with white Titanium oxide (TiO) paint. That's the same type of paint NASA used on Apollo moon rockets 30 years ago, according to Carl Hergenrother, who conducted the study with colleague Robert Whiteley." It could be only semantics or a misprint here, insofar as "titanium oxide" can refer to both TiO and TiO2 but the two have different spectra and are different in terms of the implications of the level of technology necessary to use either - and it was TiO2 (rutile) that was used in NASA's paint not TiO. If the spectrum were truly was that of TiO and not TiO2, and the TiO could be construed as some kind of inorganic polymer or advanced ceramic (use silicon as an analogy - quartz is stone age, Silanes are high tech) then we have a major story. Anyway, the bottom line is that the official spin so far is producing as many questions as answers. At the very least, they should change the category from "space junk" to "space treasure" - if it is indeed the most viewable remnant of the moon landing... which for the nostalgia-prone among us was probably "our finest hour..." More later, Jones Beene BTW is there anything curiously prophetic in the name "JOO2E3" ? From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Sep 25 14:19:32 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id OAA12442; Wed, 25 Sep 2002 14:15:53 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 14:15:53 -0700 X-Sent: 25 Sep 2002 21:14:33 GMT Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20020925170018.02be7a98 mail.DIRECTVInternet.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell mail.DIRECTVInternet.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 17:14:32 -0400 To: vortex-L eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: LENR-CANR.org library on line Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <"eVttn.0.K23.8UYaz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/48019 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: The library of uploads at LENR-CANR.org is back on line. Some of the files previously available at LENR.org are not yet available. I will add them to the database and prepare them soon. The feature to list by publication is not quite ready. I am concerned about this ISP. Some of the downloads are slow or they have timed out. Perhaps that is my computer, or perhaps this is not a reliable ISP. I would appreciate it if people here would download several papers from the library and report to me if you have trouble. It may be that some of the Acrobat .pdf files are corrupted. I will generate new ones in the coming weeks. The former website, LENR.org, now produces a blank page. That's puzzling. I do not know why it is set that way. It might make people might think the library has vanished, but in any case, the library is here at LENR-CANR.org. It will be much improved in the coming weeks, with many more papers and abstracts. I think readers will enjoy the new format. The database of publications titles was provided by Ed Storms. It is partly based on the titles and summaries collected by Dieter Britz. Let me express my appreciation to both of them. I spent last five days rooting through the database to find duplicate paper titles with misspelled words, and variations such as: "McKubre, M.C.H." and "McKubre, M" which confused the program. There are still a few rough spots. I will make the entire database downloadable for people with the EndNote program, and in various other formats. - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Sep 25 14:49:40 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id OAA27187; Wed, 25 Sep 2002 14:47:49 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 14:47:49 -0700 Reply-To: From: "Keith Nagel" To: Subject: RE: Has ET arrived? Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 18:02:35 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 In-Reply-To: <001401c264a6$82f77780$0a016ea8 cpq> X-Rcpt-To: Resent-Message-ID: <"Kfu0v1.0.ie6.4yYaz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/48020 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Hey Jones. It's radio free albemuth, you silly boy! K. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Sep 25 15:16:26 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id PAA06926; Wed, 25 Sep 2002 15:12:04 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 15:12:04 -0700 From: FZNIDARSIC aol.com Message-ID: Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 18:09:52 EDT Subject: Fwd: Book is back from the printer To: tkepple yahoo.com, tfrank@EdisonMission.Com, mica@world.std.com, storms2 ix.netcom.com, fstenger@suite224.net, mkaczey@charter.net, hujoyce homesteadunlimited.com, Joearjohns@aol.com, jboito floodcity.net, HaraldReissHD@aol.com, halfox@uswest.net, GeorgeHM aol.com, EFOUCHE@satx.rr.com (E.F.), djacoby@reliant.com, editor infinite-energy.com CC: vortex-L eskimo.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="part1_c6.12575b63.2ac38e30_boundary" X-Mailer: AOL 7.0 for Windows US sub 10634 Resent-Message-ID: <"FAWOw1.0.7i1.qIZaz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/48021 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: --part1_c6.12575b63.2ac38e30_boundary Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_c6.12575b63.2ac38e30_alt_boundary" --part1_c6.12575b63.2ac38e30_alt_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit A book by Broad Band Communications, that mentions my work, is on its way to the market. I tell you more after I see the advanced copy. In a message dated 9/25/02 1:50:11 PM Eastern Daylight Time, Sean Casteel writes: > Frank, > > The book for which I interviewed you earlier this year is on its way back > from the printer. I will be happy to have a copy sent to you if you send me > your snail mail address. I haven't seen the published version of the book > myself yet, but I hope you will be pleased with it. I look forward to > hearing from you and I'll talk to you later. > > Sean --part1_c6.12575b63.2ac38e30_alt_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit A book by Broad Band Communications, that mentions my work, is on its way to the market.  I tell you more after I see the advanced copy.


In a message dated 9/25/02 1:50:11 PM Eastern Daylight Time, Sean Casteel writes:


Frank,

The book for which I interviewed you earlier this year is on its way back from the printer. I will be happy to have a copy sent to you if you send me your snail mail address. I haven't seen the published version of the book myself yet, but I hope you will be pleased with it. I look forward to hearing from you and I'll talk to you later.

Sean


--part1_c6.12575b63.2ac38e30_alt_boundary-- --part1_c6.12575b63.2ac38e30_boundary Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Return-path: From: SSeancasteel aol.com Full-name: SSeancasteel Message-ID: <192.dd2f9f4.2ac35153 aol.com> Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 13:50:11 EDT Subject: Book is back from the printer To: FZNIDARSIC aol.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part2_c6.12575b63.2ac35153_boundary" X-Mailer: AOL 6.0 for Windows US sub 10577 --part2_c6.12575b63.2ac35153_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Frank, The book for which I interviewed you earlier this year is on its way back from the printer. I will be happy to have a copy sent to you if you send me your snail mail address. I haven't seen the published version of the book myself yet, but I hope you will be pleased with it. I look forward to hearing from you and I'll talk to you later. Sean --part2_c6.12575b63.2ac35153_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Frank,

The book for which I interviewed you earlier this year is on its way back from the printer. I will be happy to have a copy sent to you if you send me your snail mail address. I haven't seen the published version of the book myself yet, but I hope you will be pleased with it. I look forward to hearing from you and I'll talk to you later.

Sean
--part2_c6.12575b63.2ac35153_boundary-- --part1_c6.12575b63.2ac38e30_boundary-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Sep 25 15:30:41 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id PAA13905; Wed, 25 Sep 2002 15:28:13 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 15:28:13 -0700 Message-ID: <3D922CA9.54A7D486 ix.netcom.com> Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 15:38:37 -0600 From: Edmund Storms X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 (Macintosh; U; PPC) X-Accept-Language: en,pdf MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: LENR-CANR.org library on line References: <5.1.0.14.2.20020925170018.02be7a98 mail.DIRECTVInternet.com> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------61BD2875A29C41679F0DD8A9" Resent-Message-ID: <"h0nNo1.0.5P3.zXZaz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/48022 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------61BD2875A29C41679F0DD8A9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Jed, both Peter's and my introduction are old copies. I sent the corrected copies and these should be used. Other than that, it looks good. Ed Jed Rothwell wrote: > The library of uploads at LENR-CANR.org is back on line. Some of the files > previously available at LENR.org are not yet available. I will add them to > the database and prepare them soon. The feature to list by publication is > not quite ready. > > I am concerned about this ISP. Some of the downloads are slow or they have > timed out. Perhaps that is my computer, or perhaps this is not a reliable > ISP. I would appreciate it if people here would download several papers > from the library and report to me if you have trouble. > > It may be that some of the Acrobat .pdf files are corrupted. I will > generate new ones in the coming weeks. > > The former website, LENR.org, now produces a blank page. That's puzzling. I > do not know why it is set that way. It might make people might think the > library has vanished, but in any case, the library is here at > LENR-CANR.org. It will be much improved in the coming weeks, with many more > papers and abstracts. I think readers will enjoy the new format. > > The database of publications titles was provided by Ed Storms. It is partly > based on the titles and summaries collected by Dieter Britz. Let me express > my appreciation to both of them. > > I spent last five days rooting through the database to find duplicate paper > titles with misspelled words, and variations such as: "McKubre, M.C.H." and > "McKubre, M" which confused the program. There are still a few rough spots. > I will make the entire database downloadable for people with the EndNote > program, and in various other formats. > > - Jed --------------61BD2875A29C41679F0DD8A9 Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii; name="storms2.vcf" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Description: Card for Edmund Storms Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="storms2.vcf" begin:vcard n:; tel;work:505 988 3673 x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:http://home.netcom.com/~storms2/index.html org:Energy K. System adr:;;2140 Paseo Ponderosa;Santa Fe;NM;87501;http://home.netcom.com/~storms2/index.html version:2.1 email;internet:storms2 ix.netcom.com x-mozilla-cpt:;1 fn:Edmund Storms end:vcard --------------61BD2875A29C41679F0DD8A9-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Sep 25 15:36:10 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id PAA16189; Wed, 25 Sep 2002 15:33:25 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 15:33:25 -0700 Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 15:31:15 -0700 From: Jones Beene Subject: Re: Has ET arrived? To: knagel gis.net Cc: vortex Message-id: <008701c264e3$42fe21a0$0a016ea8 cpq> MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 Content-type: text/plain; charset=Windows-1252 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-priority: Normal References: Resent-Message-ID: <"hjOCP2.0.sy3.qcZaz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/48023 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: From: "Keith Nagel" > It's radio free albemuth, you silly boy! > K. Good to see that some other-worldly SF-aware tormented soul out there has a clue... and/or recognizes a little touch of tongue-in-cheek (i.e. philish) humor! For everyone else, check out: http://www.philipkdick.com/albemuth.htm or... for the more esoterically effete sophists of the world: http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol3/issue3/robinson.html From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Sep 25 16:41:06 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id QAA13712; Wed, 25 Sep 2002 16:39:34 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 16:39:34 -0700 Reply-To: From: "Keith Nagel" To: Subject: RE: Has ET arrived? Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 19:54:31 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 In-Reply-To: <008701c264e3$42fe21a0$0a016ea8 cpq> X-Rcpt-To: Resent-Message-ID: <"_qPEQ3.0.5M3.raaaz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/48024 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Why not, Jones? Ferris F. Fremont is in fact, president. The Empire has in fact, never ended. And we all still reside deep in the black iron prison. Try as I might, I have great difficulty seeing much humour in Phil's writing. On the other hand, Heavens Gate? Now THAT'S FUNNY! K. -----Original Message----- From: Jones Beene [mailto:jonesb9 pacbell.net] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 6:31 PM To: knagel gis.net Cc: vortex Subject: Re: Has ET arrived? From: "Keith Nagel" > It's radio free albemuth, you silly boy! > K. Good to see that some other-worldly SF-aware tormented soul out there has a clue... and/or recognizes a little touch of tongue-in-cheek (i.e. philish) humor! For everyone else, check out: http://www.philipkdick.com/albemuth.htm or... for the more esoterically effete sophists of the world: http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol3/issue3/robinson.html From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Sep 25 16:45:05 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id QAA14981; Wed, 25 Sep 2002 16:43:32 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 16:43:32 -0700 Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 19:44:05 -0400 (EDT) From: John Schnurer To: Vortex Subject: Odd Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY=2QIIuu1gfmr8t3n-11OWxRxY9hk1iM86FHQgvig Content-ID: Resent-Message-ID: <"vUuvP3.0._f3.Zeaaz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/48025 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. Send mail to mime docserver.cac.washington.edu for more info. --2QIIuu1gfmr8t3n-11OWxRxY9hk1iM86FHQgvig Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-ID: Dear vo., Can you read this text. --2QIIuu1gfmr8t3n-11OWxRxY9hk1iM86FHQgvig Content-Type: MESSAGE/RFC822 Content-ID: Content-Description: Received: (qmail 18137 invoked from network); 25 Sep 2002 23:42:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m15.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 25 Sep 2002 23:42:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO college.antioch-college.edu) (192.131.123.11) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 25 Sep 2002 23:42:16 -0000 Received: from college.antioch-college.edu (antioch-college.edu [192.131.123.11]) by college.antioch-college.edu (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id g8PNgnC04081; Wed, 25 Sep 2002 19:42:50 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 19:42:49 -0400 (EDT) From: John Schnurer To: "Bruce A. Perreault" cc: jlnlabs yahoogroups.com, evgray@egroups.com, nuenergy@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: Strange test result from Moray Semiconductor In-Reply-To: <3D920907.2833 cyberportal.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Dear Bruce, Physically what is the desription of the metal and how is it manipulated? Is it held in the hand? Have you conducted the other tests of using metal that is: A) electrically isolated B) electrically connected to ground C) electrically connecter to yourself? 1) have you measure the DVM you use to find out the magnitude and nature of the current it uses to produce its measurment? 2) will you describe the exact manner in which the electrical connections are made to the sample? 3) have you used warm and cold conditions to alter the behavior of the measures? IMPORTANT: Please, while describing to us how the connections are made, make connection to the "material" and let us know the result. Disconnect the material and re-connect the meter... please let us know the result. Please make a third connection and let us know the result. Repeat all the test, above, please, with the material while the test sample ONLY is a] Shielded by Faraday Cage connected to Earth Ground b] Shielded by Faraday Cage connected to one terminal of the meter c] Shielded by Faraday Cage connected to Earth Ground at 5 volts DC above one terminal of the meter The currents passed through the "material" and the magnitude of the altered currents are MINISCULE values. Until such time as you make an effort to PLEASE address artifact, the results are: A) Not conclusive of any behavior per se other than your immediate surroundings, as reflected by the currents you have on the surface of your skin B) Static or non time variant or slowly time variant electric fields as reflected by your surroundings C) Random electrical connection effects. A simple test any owner of a DIGITAL volt meter with 2000 meg ohms scale can make to demonstrate artifact. 1] Use white bond typing paper of equivalent 2] Using graphite (also falsely known as "lead") pencil draw a thin meandering line with a total area of about 1 cm square ....test with the meter at 2000 meg ohm scale until you arrive at about 200 to 1,000 meg ohm 3] NOW: i] take a measure, remove the connection and re establish the connection... how close can you come to the first reading ii] breathe on the paper near the connections iii] wave the paper with connections around in the air iv] allow the meter to remain connected for 30 minutes v] Move the paper and connections from the location of the original set up, say on the table you do experiments on to: 1] the floor 2] another room 3] outside 4] a shielded enclosure 5] near a comb charge by combing the hair 6] near a color CRT of a computer or TV Report the stability and repeatability of the meter readings. Alternatives to pencil line: brick concrete block concrete floor concrete wall sheet rock unpainted sheet rock, one side, then the other side dry clay All of these materials listed as alternatives will yield, to a greater or lesser degree. "mysterious" and "important" readings when approached by the hand or finger .... yet when shielded electrically. JH On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Bruce A. Perreault wrote: > John, > > Approaching the target material with any metal whether > my finger is touching the metal or not increases the > resistance off scale, over 2000 megs. I get an "OL" > reading on my DVM. The only thing that brings down the > resistance is if one of my fingers approaches the target. > > -BAP > > > > > John Schnurer wrote: > > > > It looks as though it is a proximity effect. If you want to check > > this, use anything conductive, opaque, about the same sixe as your finder > > and electrically connect it to you. Bring it near the set up just as you > > did yiur finger. Kepp everything else the same. > > To test other effects of proximity, use non conductive, but > > opaque, same but transparent. > > > > Please let me know. > > > > You should be aware the 2000 meg scale will detect the tiniest > > field changes... and you are a big conductor. 200 megs is miniscule > > current passing do the E = I/R canculation and to find the V (E) use > > another high impedance meter and connect it to the leads of your meter... > > or a scope is better, and set the meter to the 2000 meg scale. > > In fact, do your experiment, then connect another meter to measure > > V (E) at THE same time as you make your measure. > > Few understand or even look at how the digital meters work or what > > their "front end" is ...do you know about yours? > > > > On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, Bruce A. Perreault wrote: > > > > > John, > > > > > > I used a Tenma DVM model no. 72-4025 bought from MCM Electronics. > > > The leads to the semiconductor (maybe insulator), are > > > connected to its two leads, via two 15 inch end to end plastic > > > insulated wires that have alligator clips at their ends that are > > > connected in series with the DVM. The probes are fixed. The closet > > > that the leads come together is about 7 mm. The upper range averages > > > around 400 megs on the 2000 meg scale. When my finger is about 1 mm > > > from the surface of the target goes as low as 150 megs. This is a > > > difference of about 250 megs. The target length = 2.5 cm. Its width = 1 > > > cm. > > > Its thickness is very close to 1 mm. A picture can be seen at... > > > > > > http://www.nuenergy.org/tube_display.htm labeled "Semiconductor used in > > > Low & Medium Capacitor Discharger Tubes". > > > > > > > > > Best Regards, Bruce A. Perreault > > > > > > > > > > > > John Schnurer wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Bruce and people, > > > > > > > > Again we laud Bruce for bringing new and interesting information > > > > to light. > > > > > > > > Bruce: > > > > > > > > Can you please let us know some simple details of the experimental > > > > set up? > > > > > > > > A) Specifically: > > > > > > > > What is being used to measure resistance and how is the > > > > device connected? > > > > What is the range of change in resistance? > > > > What is the distance between the probes? > > > > Are the probes mechanically fixed in place? > > > > What are some examples of other variables the material > > > > has been exposed to? > > > > > > > > For example an answer may be something such as: > > > > > > > > The resistance is measured by a Fluke digital volt meter or DVM > > > > model 2230 and the resistance begins at 7.78 meg ohms and changes to 7.76 > > > > meg ohms. The finger begins 150 cm away and ends 2 mm away. > > > > > > > > The probes are alligator clips and are positioned 2 mm apart on a > > > > small example of the metal 7 mm by 22 mm. > > > > > > > > Description of energy the material has been exposed to include: > > > > > > > > ???? > > > > > > > > Why is the material though to be a semiconductor? > > > > Can you show a photo of the experimental set up for this important > > > > work indicating finger energy? > > > > > > > > ________________ > > > > > > > > On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Bruce A. Perreault wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hello All! > > > > > > > > > > I have exposed the surface of a semiconductor > > > > > that I obtained from one of the broken Moray > > > > > tubes to all sorts of energy, including > > > > > radioactivity. Non of which caused the material > > > > > to react except for one. When my finger approaches > > > > > the surface its resistance goes lower. At first I > > > > > thought that the reaction might be caused by heat > > > > > from my finger. However, when approached with a > > > > > lighted match-stick there is no effect at all. > > > > > Only the energy from one of my fingers will trigger > > > > > the response. I have tried my arm, wrist and tongue... > > > > > The effect only occurs at the tips of my fingers. > > > > > > > > > > -Bruce A. Perreault > > > > --2QIIuu1gfmr8t3n-11OWxRxY9hk1iM86FHQgvig-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Sep 25 16:46:11 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id QAA15425; Wed, 25 Sep 2002 16:44:47 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 16:44:47 -0700 Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 19:45:22 -0400 (EDT) From: John Schnurer To: Vortex cc: Schnurer Subject: Re: Strange test result from Moray Semiconductor (fwd) Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Resent-Message-ID: <"qGauS3.0.vm3.kfaaz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/48026 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 19:42:49 -0400 (EDT) From: John Schnurer To: "Bruce A. Perreault" Cc: jlnlabs yahoogroups.com, evgray@egroups.com, nuenergy@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: Strange test result from Moray Semiconductor Dear Bruce, Physically what is the desription of the metal and how is it manipulated? Is it held in the hand? Have you conducted the other tests of using metal that is: A) electrically isolated B) electrically connected to ground C) electrically connecter to yourself? 1) have you measure the DVM you use to find out the magnitude and nature of the current it uses to produce its measurment? 2) will you describe the exact manner in which the electrical connections are made to the sample? 3) have you used warm and cold conditions to alter the behavior of the measures? IMPORTANT: Please, while describing to us how the connections are made, make connection to the "material" and let us know the result. Disconnect the material and re-connect the meter... please let us know the result. Please make a third connection and let us know the result. Repeat all the test, above, please, with the material while the test sample ONLY is a] Shielded by Faraday Cage connected to Earth Ground b] Shielded by Faraday Cage connected to one terminal of the meter c] Shielded by Faraday Cage connected to Earth Ground at 5 volts DC above one terminal of the meter The currents passed through the "material" and the magnitude of the altered currents are MINISCULE values. Until such time as you make an effort to PLEASE address artifact, the results are: A) Not conclusive of any behavior per se other than your immediate surroundings, as reflected by the currents you have on the surface of your skin B) Static or non time variant or slowly time variant electric fields as reflected by your surroundings C) Random electrical connection effects. A simple test any owner of a DIGITAL volt meter with 2000 meg ohms scale can make to demonstrate artifact. 1] Use white bond typing paper of equivalent 2] Using graphite (also falsely known as "lead") pencil draw a thin meandering line with a total area of about 1 cm square ....test with the meter at 2000 meg ohm scale until you arrive at about 200 to 1,000 meg ohm 3] NOW: i] take a measure, remove the connection and re establish the connection... how close can you come to the first reading ii] breathe on the paper near the connections iii] wave the paper with connections around in the air iv] allow the meter to remain connected for 30 minutes v] Move the paper and connections from the location of the original set up, say on the table you do experiments on to: 1] the floor 2] another room 3] outside 4] a shielded enclosure 5] near a comb charge by combing the hair 6] near a color CRT of a computer or TV Report the stability and repeatability of the meter readings. Alternatives to pencil line: brick concrete block concrete floor concrete wall sheet rock unpainted sheet rock, one side, then the other side dry clay All of these materials listed as alternatives will yield, to a greater or lesser degree. "mysterious" and "important" readings when approached by the hand or finger .... yet when shielded electrically. JH On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Bruce A. Perreault wrote: > John, > > Approaching the target material with any metal whether > my finger is touching the metal or not increases the > resistance off scale, over 2000 megs. I get an "OL" > reading on my DVM. The only thing that brings down the > resistance is if one of my fingers approaches the target. > > -BAP > > > > > John Schnurer wrote: > > > > It looks as though it is a proximity effect. If you want to check > > this, use anything conductive, opaque, about the same sixe as your finder > > and electrically connect it to you. Bring it near the set up just as you > > did yiur finger. Kepp everything else the same. > > To test other effects of proximity, use non conductive, but > > opaque, same but transparent. > > > > Please let me know. > > > > You should be aware the 2000 meg scale will detect the tiniest > > field changes... and you are a big conductor. 200 megs is miniscule > > current passing do the E = I/R canculation and to find the V (E) use > > another high impedance meter and connect it to the leads of your meter... > > or a scope is better, and set the meter to the 2000 meg scale. > > In fact, do your experiment, then connect another meter to measure > > V (E) at THE same time as you make your measure. > > Few understand or even look at how the digital meters work or what > > their "front end" is ...do you know about yours? > > > > On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, Bruce A. Perreault wrote: > > > > > John, > > > > > > I used a Tenma DVM model no. 72-4025 bought from MCM Electronics. > > > The leads to the semiconductor (maybe insulator), are > > > connected to its two leads, via two 15 inch end to end plastic > > > insulated wires that have alligator clips at their ends that are > > > connected in series with the DVM. The probes are fixed. The closet > > > that the leads come together is about 7 mm. The upper range averages > > > around 400 megs on the 2000 meg scale. When my finger is about 1 mm > > > from the surface of the target goes as low as 150 megs. This is a > > > difference of about 250 megs. The target length = 2.5 cm. Its width = 1 > > > cm. > > > Its thickness is very close to 1 mm. A picture can be seen at... > > > > > > http://www.nuenergy.org/tube_display.htm labeled "Semiconductor used in > > > Low & Medium Capacitor Discharger Tubes". > > > > > > > > > Best Regards, Bruce A. Perreault > > > > > > > > > > > > John Schnurer wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Bruce and people, > > > > > > > > Again we laud Bruce for bringing new and interesting information > > > > to light. > > > > > > > > Bruce: > > > > > > > > Can you please let us know some simple details of the experimental > > > > set up? > > > > > > > > A) Specifically: > > > > > > > > What is being used to measure resistance and how is the > > > > device connected? > > > > What is the range of change in resistance? > > > > What is the distance between the probes? > > > > Are the probes mechanically fixed in place? > > > > What are some examples of other variables the material > > > > has been exposed to? > > > > > > > > For example an answer may be something such as: > > > > > > > > The resistance is measured by a Fluke digital volt meter or DVM > > > > model 2230 and the resistance begins at 7.78 meg ohms and changes to 7.76 > > > > meg ohms. The finger begins 150 cm away and ends 2 mm away. > > > > > > > > The probes are alligator clips and are positioned 2 mm apart on a > > > > small example of the metal 7 mm by 22 mm. > > > > > > > > Description of energy the material has been exposed to include: > > > > > > > > ???? > > > > > > > > Why is the material though to be a semiconductor? > > > > Can you show a photo of the experimental set up for this important > > > > work indicating finger energy? > > > > > > > > ________________ > > > > > > > > On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Bruce A. Perreault wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hello All! > > > > > > > > > > I have exposed the surface of a semiconductor > > > > > that I obtained from one of the broken Moray > > > > > tubes to all sorts of energy, including > > > > > radioactivity. Non of which caused the material > > > > > to react except for one. When my finger approaches > > > > > the surface its resistance goes lower. At first I > > > > > thought that the reaction might be caused by heat > > > > > from my finger. However, when approached with a > > > > > lighted match-stick there is no effect at all. > > > > > Only the energy from one of my fingers will trigger > > > > > the response. I have tried my arm, wrist and tongue... > > > > > The effect only occurs at the tips of my fingers. > > > > > > > > > > -Bruce A. Perreault > > > > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Sep 25 18:23:54 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id SAA24491; Wed, 25 Sep 2002 18:22:41 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 18:22:41 -0700 Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 21:23:09 -0400 (EDT) From: John Schnurer To: Vortex Subject: A question to Bruce Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Resent-Message-ID: <"0VeWJ3.0.a-5.X5caz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/48027 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 08:31:12 -0400 From: "Bruce A. Perreault" To: John Schnurer Subject: A question to Bruce John, This is Don Smith... http://ionvalve.com/iw/2002/smith.htm -BAP John Schnurer wrote: > Who is Don Smith? What is his patent number. > Please. > > JH > > On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, Bruce A. Perreault wrote: > > Zoltan, > > > > I really that that Don should answer questions > > that are directed at his device. > > > > For me, I will be disclosing my latest findings > > on the radiant energy device. I will show that > > anyone can build a device using off the shelf > > parts. My special components make the device > > run with extreme efficiency. There is no reason > > why the average experimenter can't build a crude > > working prototype. > > > > -BAP > > Zoltan Bihari wrote: > > > > > > Hi Bruce, do You know when will be avaiable Don Smith`s patent on > > > his gaseous tube device ? I collected all infos on this and now > > > trying to build it. Very simple and very powerful device... I hope > > > I`ll have success... :-))) I wait the conference so much, for more > > > info on this device... Mr. Smith will give all details to public ? > > > It will be a great thing ! Will You show some new things, too, right ? > > > Bye, and I wish the bests, > > > > > > Zoltan From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Sep 26 16:43:52 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id QAA02387; Thu, 26 Sep 2002 16:37:52 -0700 Resent-Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 16:37:52 -0700 Message-ID: <3D939A71.8050109 bellsouth.net> Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 19:38:25 -0400 From: Terry Blanton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Has ET arrived? References: <008701c264e3$42fe21a0$0a016ea8@cpq> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"iPSWi1.0.-a.Ffvaz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/48028 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Jones Beene wrote: >From: "Keith Nagel" > > > >>It's radio free albemuth, you silly boy! >> >> > > > >>K. >> >> > > >Good to see that some other-worldly SF-aware tormented soul out there has a >clue... and/or recognizes a little touch of tongue-in-cheek (i.e. philish) >humor! > If we find it is VALIS, we'll be biting those tongues! Terry From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Sep 26 17:01:45 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id QAA08817; Thu, 26 Sep 2002 16:56:51 -0700 Resent-Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 16:56:51 -0700 Message-ID: <3D939EE2.9090903 bellsouth.net> Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 19:57:22 -0400 From: Terry Blanton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: [Fwd: Re: Has ET arrived?] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"o3TaA3.0.e92.2xvaz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/48029 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: Has ET arrived? Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 19:41:05 -0400 From: Terry Blanton To: knagel gis.net References: Keith Nagel wrote: >And we all still reside deep in the black iron prison. > Since 70 AD when the Bent One silenced this planet. Terry From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Sep 27 13:33:07 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id NAA18847; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 13:32:08 -0700 Resent-Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 13:32:08 -0700 Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 16:32:42 -0400 (EDT) From: John Schnurer To: Terry Blanton cc: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: Has ET arrived?] In-Reply-To: <3D939EE2.9090903 bellsouth.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Resent-Message-ID: <"xX0j_2.0.Pc4.71Cbz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/48030 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Dear Terry, is the bent one the person who helps write the Inquirer and questions for Oprah? On Thu, 26 Sep 2002, Terry Blanton wrote: > > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: Has ET arrived? > Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 19:41:05 -0400 > From: Terry Blanton > To: knagel gis.net > References: > > > > Keith Nagel wrote: > > >And we all still reside deep in the black iron prison. > > > > Since 70 AD when the Bent One silenced this planet. > > Terry > > > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Sep 27 14:35:41 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id OAA14628; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 14:34:39 -0700 Resent-Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 14:34:39 -0700 Message-ID: <3D94CF5A.2020101 rtpatlanta.com> Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 17:36:26 -0400 From: "Terry Blanton" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: Has ET arrived?] References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"es4du2.0.Sa3.kxCbz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/48031 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: John Schnurer wrote: > Dear Terry, > > is the bent one the person who helps write the Inquirer and >questions for Oprah? > > From "Out of a Silent Planet" by CS Lewis. Considering Lewis' Christocentric writings, I believe the Bent One is the Fallen Angel, Lucifer. Terry From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Sep 27 14:47:46 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id OAA20367; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 14:45:29 -0700 Resent-Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 14:45:29 -0700 Message-ID: <20020927214457.70859.qmail web40408.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 14:44:57 -0700 (PDT) From: Charles Ford Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: Has ET arrived?] To: vortex-l eskimo.com In-Reply-To: <3D94CF5A.2020101 rtpatlanta.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Resent-Message-ID: <"4u5FR2.0.4-4.v5Dbz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/48032 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Still talking sci-fi... Right? --- Terry Blanton wrote: > John Schnurer wrote: > > > Dear Terry, > > > > is the bent one the person who helps write the Inquirer and > >questions for Oprah? > > > > > > > > From "Out of a Silent Planet" by CS Lewis. Considering Lewis' > Christocentric writings, I believe the Bent One is the Fallen Angel, > Lucifer. > > Terry > ===== Charles Ford KC5-OWZ cjford1 yahoo.com cjford1 swbell.net __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo! http://sbc.yahoo.com From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Sep 27 18:36:00 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id SAA19828; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 18:34:52 -0700 Resent-Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 18:34:52 -0700 Message-ID: <3D9506E2.14113733 ix.netcom.com> Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 18:33:22 -0700 From: Akira Kawasaki X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en]C-CCK-MCD NSCPCD472 (Win95; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Vortex Subject: [Fwd: What's New for Sep 27, 2002] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"Fg1Uw2.0.jr4.ySGbz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/48033 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: -------- Original Message -------- Subject: What's New for Sep 27, 2002 Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 16:22:08 -0400 (EDT) From: "What's New" To: aki ix.netcom.com WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 27 Sep 02 FENWICK ISLAND, DE NOTE: Thousands of hopelessly misinformed activists descended on Washington, DC today vowing, as they do each year, to disrupt the annual meeting of the World Bank and International Monetary Fund. The APS Washington Office is closed as a precaution. 1. MISCONDUCT: SHOEN INVESTIGATION COMMITTEE FINDS FABRICATION. A committee appointed by Bell Labs to investigate allegations of falsified data in papers on which Jan Hendrik Shoen was the lead author, confirmed the worst fears of the physics community. The Committee, chaired by Malcolm Beasley, concluded it was "a clear, unambiguous case of scientific misconduct." The panel cleared Shoen's coauthors of scientific misconduct, but concluded, that "by virtue of their coauthorship, they implicitly endorsed the validity of the work. There is no implication here of scientific misconduct; the issue is one of professional responsibility." The panel noted that this difficult issue has not been carefully considered by the scientific community. It will certainly be considered now. Victor Ninov had as many as 15 coauthors in his fabricated work on super-heavy elements (WN 19 Jul 02). 2. THE QUESTION: WHY WOULD A BRIGHT, RESPECTED SCIENTIST DO THIS? In a prepared statement, Schoen said he believes his discoveries are real. He is not the first scientist to attempt to anticipate what Nature will do. Nor is he the first to go into denial if the experiment shows that Nature has something else in mind. 3. ISS: RUSSIA WANTS TO MOTHBALL THE SPACE STATION. Just last week, WN reported that a National Research Council panel, The Task Group on Research on the International Space Station, had raised serious questions about the value of continuing research on the ISS (WN 20 Sep 02). On Wednesday, it was disclosed that a top Russian space official, Valeri Riumin, had written his NASA counterpart, Bill Gerstenmaier, to propose mothballing the ISS to save money. Riumin called the situation "desperate." It seems there will never be enough celebrity tourists to make ISS pay. Russia, of course, has experience, having mothballed Mir for more than a year. It looks like a plan the US should embrace. From a political standpoint, it's not quite the same as scrapping it. 4. INTELLIGENT DESIGN: NATIONAL ACADEMY JOINS COBB COUNTY FRAY. In Cobb County, Georgia, as elsewhere, religious fundamentalists failed to get creationism taught in the schools, so they said it was really "creation science." When that failed, they pushed for its thinly disguised twin, intelligent design. They persuaded the Cobb County School Board to adopt a sticker for high school science textbooks: " Evolution is a theory, not a fact, regarding the origin of living things." Bruce Alberts urged Academy members in Georgia to lobby the Cobb Board to remove the disclaimer. THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND and THE AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY Opinions are the author's and are not necessarily shared by the University or the American Physical Society, but they should be. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Sep 27 20:29:37 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id UAA25897; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 20:28:42 -0700 Resent-Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 20:28:42 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: rick mail.highsurf.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <3D94CF5A.2020101 rtpatlanta.com> References: <3D94CF5A.2020101 rtpatlanta.com> Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 17:26:05 -1000 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Rick Monteverde Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: Has ET arrived?] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Resent-Message-ID: <"V9CrO2.0.TK6.g7Ibz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/48034 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: I thought the "bent one" was Kokopelli, the little bent over flute-dude. R. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Sep 28 08:41:23 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id IAA24235; Sat, 28 Sep 2002 08:40:14 -0700 Resent-Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2002 08:40:14 -0700 Message-ID: <3D95CD7F.9090802 rtpatlanta.com> Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2002 11:40:47 -0400 From: Terry Blanton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: Has ET arrived?] References: <3D94CF5A.2020101@rtpatlanta.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"ejCD01.0.bw5.UrSbz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/48035 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Rick Monteverde wrote: >I thought the "bent one" was Kokopelli, the little bent over flute-dude. > >R. > > > > That's a flute? He's the fertility dude with the eternal bad hair day, right? Terry From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Sep 28 08:57:07 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id IAA28671; Sat, 28 Sep 2002 08:55:45 -0700 Resent-Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2002 08:55:45 -0700 Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2002 08:53:29 -0700 From: Jones Beene Subject: Weapons-grade uranium headed to Iraq To: vortex Message-id: <000f01c26707$310d9180$0a016ea8 cpq> MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000C_01C266CC.844A0440" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-priority: Normal Resent-Message-ID: <"PDVL81.0.v_6.14Tbz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/48036 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_000C_01C266CC.844A0440 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable OOPS! The few remaining "doves" out there, amongst the vast "kettle" of hawks = in Washington (Bush being the kettle-meister) had been hoping that this = kind of thing just couldn't happen - that there were good international = controls on this stuff - BTW, if this story is accurate - this amount = seems to be just about enough to build a small bomb, "small" as in = adequate to take out lower Manhattan. This could be all the incentive Bush needs to invade. http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=3Dstory&u=3D/nm/20020928/ts_nm/turk= ey_uranium_dc_3 "Captured weapons-grade uranium weighing more than 33 pounds is on = display at the paramilitary police headquarters of southeast province of = Sanliurfa, Turkey, September 28, 2002. Turkish gendarmes seized the = uranium and detained two men accused of smuggling the material, = Anatolian Agency said. Authorities believe the uranium came from an = eastern European country and has a value about $5 million. (Anatolian = via Reuters)" Wonder how many of these shipments didn't get stopped? If you think the stock market has reached the bottom now, just wait till = Monday... ------=_NextPart_000_000C_01C266CC.844A0440 Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
OOPS!
 
The few remaining "doves" out there, amongst the vast "kettle" of = hawks in=20 Washington (Bush being the kettle-meister) had been hoping that = this kind=20 of thing just couldn't happen - that there were good international = controls=20 on this stuff - BTW, if this story is accurate - this amount seems = to=20 be just about enough to build a small bomb, "small" as in = adequate to=20 take out lower Manhattan.
 
This could be all the incentive Bush needs to invade.
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=3Dstor= y&u=3D/nm/20020928/ts_nm/turkey_uranium_dc_3
 
"Captured weapons-grade uranium weighing more than 33 pounds is on = display=20 at the paramilitary police headquarters of southeast province of = Sanliurfa,=20 Turkey, September 28, 2002. Turkish gendarmes seized the uranium and = detained=20 two men accused of smuggling the material, Anatolian Agency said. = Authorities=20 believe the uranium came from an eastern European country and has a = value about=20 $5 million. (Anatolian via Reuters)"
 
Wonder how many of these shipments didn't get stopped?
 
If you think the stock market has reached the bottom now, just wait = till=20 Monday...
------=_NextPart_000_000C_01C266CC.844A0440-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Sep 28 14:39:30 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id OAA08130; Sat, 28 Sep 2002 14:38:40 -0700 Resent-Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2002 14:38:40 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: rick mail.highsurf.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <3D95CD7F.9090802 rtpatlanta.com> References: <3D94CF5A.2020101 rtpatlanta.com> <3D95CD7F.9090802 rtpatlanta.com> Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2002 11:37:15 -1000 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Rick Monteverde Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: Has ET arrived?] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Resent-Message-ID: <"aOXXz2.0.y-1.V5Ybz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/48037 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Well if it's not a flute, then his hair should be the least of his worries! >That's a flute? > >He's the fertility dude with the eternal bad hair day, right? > >Terry From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Sep 28 15:57:39 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id PAA32278; Sat, 28 Sep 2002 15:56:21 -0700 Resent-Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2002 15:56:21 -0700 Message-ID: <3D9633B7.6080004 bellsouth.net> Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2002 18:56:55 -0400 From: Terry Blanton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Weapons-grade uranium headed to Iraq References: <000f01c26707$310d9180$0a016ea8 cpq> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"Uw9gN3.0.Bu7.KEZbz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/48038 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Jones Beene wrote: > OOPS! > > The few remaining "doves" out there, amongst the vast "kettle" of > hawks in Washington (Bush being the kettle-meister) had been hoping > that this kind of thing just couldn't happen - that there were good > international controls on this stuff - BTW, if this story is accurate > - this amount seems to be just about enough to build a small bomb, > "small" as in adequate to take out lower Manhattan. > > This could be all the incentive Bush needs to invade. > http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/nm/20020928/ts_nm/turkey_uranium_dc_3 > > > "Captured weapons-grade uranium weighing more than 33 pounds is on > display at the paramilitary police headquarters of southeast province > of Sanliurfa, Turkey, September 28, 2002. Turkish gendarmes seized the > uranium and detained two men accused of smuggling the material, > Anatolian Agency said. Authorities believe the uranium came from an > eastern European country and has a value about $5 million. (Anatolian > via Reuters)" > > Wonder how many of these shipments didn't get stopped? > > If you think the stock market has reached the bottom now, just wait > till Monday... What is truly interesting is that the article claims that the U came from a "Eastern European Country:" But if you look carerully on the bottom left of the ingot (you need the enlarged image or the one presently on drudgereport.com), it clearly says "Made in W Germany." WTF is going on here? Terry From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Sep 28 16:29:37 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id QAA09132; Sat, 28 Sep 2002 16:27:32 -0700 Resent-Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2002 16:27:32 -0700 From: Robin van Spaandonk To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Weapons-grade uranium headed to Iraq Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 09:26:56 +1000 Organization: Improving Message-ID: <8decpukhoaa6os7n2gd76s8hhj9gf4oqpg 4ax.com> References: <000f01c26707$310d9180$0a016ea8 cpq> <3D9633B7.6080004@bellsouth.net> In-Reply-To: <3D9633B7.6080004 bellsouth.net> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.92/32.572 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id QAA09100 Resent-Message-ID: <"LQ-6A.0.bE2.ahZbz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/48039 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Sat, 28 Sep 2002 18:56:55 -0400: Hi, [snip] >What is truly interesting is that the article claims that the U came >from a "Eastern European Country:" > >But if you look carerully on the bottom left of the ingot (you need the >enlarged image or the one presently on drudgereport.com), it clearly >says "Made in W Germany." WTF is going on here? > >Terry It's clearly a plant designed to both build a case for military intervention, and concurrently put the blame on Germany, as retaliation for being such a vocal opponent. In fact it may not even be weapons grade uranium, just something that looks the part, and conveniently gets that label stuck on it for the sake of the press (corrupt officials are not unknown in Turkey ;). Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ Competition provides the motivation, Cooperation provides the means. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Sep 28 18:26:21 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id SAA21381; Sat, 28 Sep 2002 18:23:10 -0700 Resent-Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2002 18:23:10 -0700 Message-ID: <20020929012238.40163.qmail web40412.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2002 18:22:38 -0700 (PDT) From: Charles Ford Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: Has ET arrived?] To: vortex-l eskimo.com In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Resent-Message-ID: <"0DhJA1.0._D5.-Nbbz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/48040 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: --- Rick Monteverde wrote: > Well if it's not a flute, then his hair should be the least of his > worries! > ZEE.... CRASH ! ! Damn! There goes the wheels out from under my chair again. ===== Charles Ford KC5-OWZ cjford1 yahoo.com cjford1 swbell.net __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo! http://sbc.yahoo.com From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Sep 29 17:57:35 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id RAA30581; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 17:56:08 -0700 Resent-Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 17:56:08 -0700 Message-ID: <3D97A14D.1030803 rtpatlanta.com> Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 20:56:45 -0400 From: Terry Blanton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Charged Sheath Vortex Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"z0uFG2.0.kT7.d4wbz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/48041 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Fusion powered tornados? http://www.peter-thomson.co.uk/ Terry From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Sep 29 20:52:03 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id UAA32241; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 20:49:55 -0700 Resent-Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 20:49:55 -0700 Message-ID: <20020930034920.2055.qmail web40411.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 20:49:20 -0700 (PDT) From: Charles Ford Subject: Re: Charged Sheath Vortex To: vortex-l eskimo.com In-Reply-To: <3D97A14D.1030803 rtpatlanta.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Resent-Message-ID: <"G8Czp3.0.bt7.Zdybz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/48042 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: --- Terry Blanton wrote: > Fusion powered tornados? > > http://www.peter-thomson.co.uk/ > > Terry > Terry: This is interesting but.... There is no evidence of diferential chargine in the tornado vortex. Tornados leave a path of destruction that is explainable using only only the wind dynamics. Maybe this UK auther could use some time in the centrial plains... ===== Charles Ford KC5-OWZ cjford1 yahoo.com cjford1 swbell.net __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo! http://sbc.yahoo.com From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Sep 29 22:37:36 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id WAA16187; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 22:36:48 -0700 Resent-Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 22:36:48 -0700 Message-ID: <3D97E333.A48F3ECE verisoft.com.tr> Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 08:37:55 +0300 From: hamdi ucar Reply-To: hamdix verisoft.com.tr X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Win98; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Charged Sheath Vortex References: <3D97A14D.1030803 rtpatlanta.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"dUauh2.0.ly3.mB-bz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/48043 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Images with bad paths like http://www.peter-thomson.co.uk/fusion/..\..\..\Inetpub\wwwroot\tornado\vortexcharge.jpg can be seen when corrected as http://www.peter-thomson.co.uk/tornado/vortexcharge.jpg Regards, hamdi ucar Terry Blanton wrote: > > Fusion powered tornados? > > http://www.peter-thomson.co.uk/ > > Terry From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Sep 30 10:14:45 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id KAA23113; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 10:08:27 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 10:08:27 -0700 Message-Id: <5.1.1.6.2.20020930190409.028e3158 pop3.wp.pl> X-Sender: blutransform pop3.wp.pl X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1.1 Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 19:06:04 -0700 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Horace Subject: Re: Charged Sheath Vortex In-Reply-To: <3D97A14D.1030803 rtpatlanta.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-AntiVirus: skaner antywirusowy poczty Wirtualnej Polski S. A. Resent-Message-ID: <"SuY4_3.0.ye5.AK8cz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/48044 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Here is another charged vortex device, that uses rotating magnetic fields has more technical details. http://www.l-s.org/magvid.html At 20:56 2002/9/29 -0400, you wrote: >Fusion powered tornados? > >http://www.peter-thomson.co.uk/ > >Terry > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Sep 30 20:10:31 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id UAA27534; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 20:06:52 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 20:06:52 -0700 Reply-To: From: "Keith Nagel" To: Subject: RE: Weapons-grade uranium headed to Iraq Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 23:21:54 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 In-Reply-To: <8decpukhoaa6os7n2gd76s8hhj9gf4oqpg 4ax.com> Importance: Normal X-Rcpt-To: Resent-Message-ID: <"ZsJcU1.0.8k6.C5Hcz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/48045 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Well well well. We went from 35 pounds, to 5 ounces. Now, it's revealed to be zinc. The phony uranium scam has been going on since the collapse of the SU, and much like the nigerian scam, continues to suck people in. It's just wonderfully ironic that the primary force standing between nuclear terrorists and a smoldering hole where my house was, is the Russian Mafia. That, and some clever european spooks who also run these scams to catch buyers. Actually, if you want to know where Saddam shops when he's in the mood for mass extermination with bio and chem weapons, look no further than the USA. http://www.suntimes.com/output/novak/cst-edt-novak26.html Plus, we provided satellite imaging and battle planning for rapid deployment of those same weapons. http://www.msnbc.com/news/807688.asp K. -----Original Message----- From: Robin van Spaandonk [mailto:rvanspaa bigpond.net.au] Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2002 7:27 PM To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Weapons-grade uranium headed to Iraq In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Sat, 28 Sep 2002 18:56:55 -0400: Hi, [snip] >What is truly interesting is that the article claims that the U came >from a "Eastern European Country:" > >But if you look carerully on the bottom left of the ingot (you need the >enlarged image or the one presently on drudgereport.com), it clearly >says "Made in W Germany." WTF is going on here? > >Terry It's clearly a plant designed to both build a case for military intervention, and concurrently put the blame on Germany, as retaliation for being such a vocal opponent. In fact it may not even be weapons grade uranium, just something that looks the part, and conveniently gets that label stuck on it for the sake of the press (corrupt officials are not unknown in Turkey ;). Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ Competition provides the motivation, Cooperation provides the means. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Sep 30 20:17:44 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id UAA30882; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 20:14:53 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 20:14:53 -0700 Reply-To: From: "Keith Nagel" To: Subject: RE: Charged Sheath Vortex Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 23:29:58 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 In-Reply-To: <5.1.1.6.2.20020930190409.028e3158 pop3.wp.pl> Importance: Normal X-Rcpt-To: Resent-Message-ID: <"e2UBy.0.SY7.jCHcz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/48046 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Hi All. I can't say much about the link below, but I've built similar circuits in the RF region to generate electromagnetic scroll waves. It's pretty easy to do, I used four 1/4 wave antennas and transmission line to generate the appropriate phase delay. To make a short story shorter, it worked just fine. I always wanted to do the same thing with some real power, but never got around to it. Perhaps one of you bright people can tell me what you'd look for by way of anomalous effects, besides teleporting to some other dimension? Something a little more tractable. At the time, I was looking for aether effects. K. -----Original Message----- From: Horace [mailto:blutransform wp.pl] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 10:06 PM To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Charged Sheath Vortex Here is another charged vortex device, that uses rotating magnetic fields has more technical details. http://www.l-s.org/magvid.html At 20:56 2002/9/29 -0400, you wrote: >Fusion powered tornados? > >http://www.peter-thomson.co.uk/ > >Terry > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Sep 30 21:12:20 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id VAA23778; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 21:09:59 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 21:09:59 -0700 X-Originating-IP: [64.24.64.180] From: "Patrick Dowland" To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: New publications on the Aetherometry website (fwd) Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2002 00:09:22 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Oct 2002 04:09:23.0526 (UTC) FILETIME=[531F1E60:01C26900] Resent-Message-ID: <"ES6qU3.0.Sp5.M0Icz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/48047 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: AKRONOS Publishing, at http://www.aetherometry.com has the pleasure to announce the publication of the following new texts on its website: 1. ABRI Monograph AS2-27: Correa, P, Correa, A & Askanas, M "Atmospheric electricity, latent heat, and ambipolar radiation: a new view of geophysics and meteorology, challenging the primacy of ionization theory" This monograph compares and contrasts two views of atmospheric physics: one based upon ionization theory, the other upon Aetherometry. It also reviews the impact of Vol.s 1 and 2 of Experimental Aetherometry upon a reformulation of basic geophysical and atmospheric processes. The full abstract is available at http://www.aetherometry.com/abs-AS2v4.html#abstractAS2-27 2. A set of two new interviews with Paulo and Alexandra Correa, conducted at ABRI in the Spring of 2002: "BECOMINGS ON THE SIDELINES OF A VICARIOUS FUTURE: The Spring 2002 Conversations at ABRI" http://www.aetherometry.com/abri_int2.html The conversations range over a wide landscape of topics, including the discovery and identification of the electric Aether, the global state, the politics of energy and of science, the debacle of the left, the journey from the molecular to the aetherometric, and 9/11 and its consequences. 3. A collection of responses we have received, or come across, to the Correas' deconstruction of James DeMeo et al's Pulse of the Planet #5 - published here in keeping with AKRONOS' policy of openly demystifying the record, and for the pleasure of our readers: "Fallout from the Challenge to Pulse of the Planet #5" http://www.aetherometry.com/PP5_fallout.html Yours, Laura McFinlay Akronos Publishing _________________________________________________________________ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Sep 30 22:07:04 2002 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id WAA15529; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 22:05:44 -0700 Resent-Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 22:05:44 -0700 From: Robin van Spaandonk To: Subject: Re: Weapons-grade uranium headed to Iraq Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2002 15:05:08 +1000 Organization: Improving Message-ID: References: <8decpukhoaa6os7n2gd76s8hhj9gf4oqpg 4ax.com> In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.92/32.572 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id WAA15481 Resent-Message-ID: <"X7es31.0.So3.eqIcz" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/48048 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: In reply to Keith Nagel's message of Mon, 30 Sep 2002 23:21:54 -0400: Hi, [snip] ...and you don't find "The two men arrested with the material were released due to lack of evidence and have since disappeared, Dilek said." at all suspicious? My take: They have done their job, and they have now been sent home. Russian mafia don't generally call ahead to the Turkish police to tell them where to look. It isn't a good way to keep your clients. OTOH someone setting up a public relations stunt does exactly that. Speculation on a possible fraud by an ex UN official maintains plausible deniability. If it walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck... >Well well well. > >We went from 35 pounds, to 5 ounces. > >Now, it's revealed to be zinc. > >The phony uranium scam has been going on since the collapse >of the SU, and much like the nigerian scam, continues to >suck people in. It's just wonderfully ironic that the primary >force standing between nuclear terrorists and a smoldering >hole where my house was, is the Russian Mafia. That, and >some clever european spooks who also run these scams to catch >buyers. > >Actually, if you want to know where Saddam shops when he's >in the mood for mass extermination with bio and chem weapons, >look no further than the USA. > >http://www.suntimes.com/output/novak/cst-edt-novak26.html > >Plus, we provided satellite imaging and battle planning >for rapid deployment of those same weapons. > >http://www.msnbc.com/news/807688.asp > > >K. > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Robin van Spaandonk [mailto:rvanspaa bigpond.net.au] >Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2002 7:27 PM >To: vortex-l eskimo.com >Subject: Re: Weapons-grade uranium headed to Iraq > > >In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Sat, 28 Sep 2002 18:56:55 -0400: >Hi, >[snip] >>What is truly interesting is that the article claims that the U came >>from a "Eastern European Country:" >> >>But if you look carerully on the bottom left of the ingot (you need the >>enlarged image or the one presently on drudgereport.com), it clearly >>says "Made in W Germany." WTF is going on here? >> >>Terry > >It's clearly a plant designed to both build a case for military >intervention, >and concurrently put the blame on Germany, as retaliation for being such a >vocal opponent. In fact it may not even be weapons grade uranium, just >something that looks the part, and conveniently gets that label stuck on it >for the sake of the press (corrupt officials are not unknown in Turkey ;). > > >Regards, > >Robin van Spaandonk > >http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ > >Competition provides the motivation, >Cooperation provides the means. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ Competition provides the motivation, Cooperation provides the means.