From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 1 05:59:08 2004 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) id FAA24719; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 05:56:07 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 05:56:07 -0800 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.1.4.030702.0 Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 08:58:25 -0500 Subject: D. Nagel Cold Fusion talk at NRL on Anniversary #15 From: "Eugene F. Mallove" To: "vortex l eskimo.com" Message-ID: Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"E-C9D3.0.726.s3qG01" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53318 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: ELECTRONICS SCIENCE & TECNOLOGY DIVISION SEMINAR Speaker: David J. Nagel Affiliation: The George Washington University Washington, DC 20052 Date: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 Time: 1:30 PM Place: Bldg. 208, Room 260A Title: COLD FUSION: PROBLEMS, PROGRESS AND PROSPECTS Abstract The problems attending cold fusion can be classified as systemic and technical. Breakdowns in communication between those involved in cold fusion research and both the scientific community and the public, and also the difficulty in getting funding for cold fusion research, are systemic problems. The technical problems associated with cold fusion have included inadequate instrumentation, incomplete materials analysis, complex protocols and, most critically, early lack of reproducibility. Despite these problems, there has been major experimental progress in the past fifteen years. Dozens of "positive" experiments have been run by competent and credentialed investigators, who used adequate instrumentation, which was properly calibrated before, during and after the experiments. Reproducibility has improved significantly. The 10th International Conference on Cold Fusion was held in Cambridge MA in August of 2003. An overview of the conference will be presented to illustrate the continual progress in the field. Several prospects for cold fusion are in the offing. A two-step plan to move toward returning cold fusion to the status of an ordinary field of scientific inquiry has been developed. The plan includes, first, a comprehensive review of the literature and, second, a national study to determine the status of the field and to recommend what ought to be done. It is already clear that a program on cold fusion should include development of better instrumentation and materials, an expanded theoretical effort and two types of experiments, namely replications of already reported successful experiments and the pursuit of the many ideas for new experiments. The bottom line: despite many problems, nuclear reactions can occur at low energies, so cold fusion is real, and what to do about it seems clear. David J. Nagel received a B.S. degree (1960) in Engineering Science from the University of Notre Dame and graduate degrees (M.S. in Physics, 1969 and Ph.D. in Engineering Materials, 1977) from the University of Maryland. He joined the civilian staff of the Naval Research Laboratory in 1964, where he held positions as a Research Physicist, Section Head, Branch Head and, finally, Superintendent of the Condensed Matter and Radiation Sciences Division. In this last position, Nagel was a member of the Senior Executive Service, and managed the experimental and theoretical research and development efforts of 150 government, contractor and other personnel. He has written or co-authored over 150 technical articles, reports, book chapters and encyclopedia articles. Nagel spent 30 years on active and reserve duty for the Navy and retired as a Captain in 1990. He became a Research Professor in the School of Engineering and Applied Science of The George Washington University in 1998. His current interests include applications of MEMS and nano-technologies, as well as low energy nuclear reactions. Host: G.M. Borsuk, 767-3525 Tina M. Chops Code 1000A Naval Research Laboratory Voice: 202-767-3404 FAX: 202-404-7419 From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 1 06:33:31 2004 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) id GAA16548; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 06:32:20 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 06:32:20 -0800 Message-ID: <40434955.7060303 rtpatlanta.com> Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 09:31:49 -0500 From: "Terry Blanton" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: NASA's Silence Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"j4TFl1.0.W24.qbqG01" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53319 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: While some here have been speculating about a coverup since NASA hasn't been too forthcoming with the tantalizing data, this article implies that some major announcements may be coming this week: http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/opportunity_evidence_040229.html From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 1 09:42:59 2004 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) id JAA13472; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 09:41:13 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 09:41:13 -0800 Message-ID: <007401c3ffb4$57d244e0$8837fea9 cpq> From: "Jones Beene" To: "vortex" Subject: Ah...what a relief Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 09:40:51 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0071_01C3FF71.49211CC0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Resent-Message-ID: <"2vxDA.0.PI3.vMtG01" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53320 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0071_01C3FF71.49211CC0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable For the amusement of any skeptics lurking out there... those who = regularly opine that alternative-energy is "full of you-know-what"... = this news item is available to illuminate... so to speak, which is not = the same as advising them to "stick it where the sun don't shine," but = close. http://www.nature.com/nsu/040223/040223-10.html I wonder if the microbes that power the sludge battery can be hybridized = to employ CF techniques, assuming they don't already?=20 Don't laugh. If cold fusion is available at modest voltages and = temperature, then it has probably already evolved as part of life = somewhere. After all, we are finding life in the most inhospitable of = places - like deep within Antarctic ice and deep within the earth, in = hydrothermal vents and probably on Mars... therefore it's possible that = to the extent that LENR involves in any way the ability to increase the = probability of QM tunneling, which was suggested as soon as P&F = announced their results, then it is very likely to be a "natural" = process... maybe even primordial? Jones BTW when the authors say, "We believe we can increase power generation = to levels of about 1000 mW per square meter [surface area]" remember = that a gram of carbon C-60 (fullerene) has as much as 1000 square meters = of surface area and can be easily made conductive. That's a kilowatt of potential power per gram of electrode, folks, even = without the benefit of hybridiztion.... therefore, to all the LENR = experimenters out there, if you ever run out of good ideas, forget the = old electrolysis cell, order some fullerenes, and get those brains (and = bowels) cranking... ------=_NextPart_000_0071_01C3FF71.49211CC0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
For the amusement of any skeptics lurking out there... = those who=20 regularly opine that alternative-energy is "full of you-know-what"... = this news=20 item is available to illuminate... so to speak, which is not the same as = advising them to "stick it where the sun don't shine," but = close.
 
http://www.natur= e.com/nsu/040223/040223-10.html
 
I wonder if the microbes that power the sludge battery can be = hybridized to=20 employ CF techniques, assuming they don't already?
 
Don't laugh. If cold fusion is available at modest voltages and=20 temperature, then it has probably already evolved as part of life = somewhere.=20 After all, we are finding life in the most inhospitable of places - like = deep=20 within Antarctic ice and deep within the earth, in hydrothermal vents = and=20 probably on Mars... therefore it's possible that to the extent that=20 LENR involves in any way the ability to increase the probability of = QM=20 tunneling, which was suggested as soon as P&F announced their = results, then=20 it is very likely to be a "natural" process... maybe even = primordial?
 
Jones
 
BTW when the authors say, "We believe we can increase power = generation to=20 levels of about 1000 mW per square meter [surface area]" remember that a = gram of=20 carbon C-60 (fullerene) has as much as 1000 square meters of surface = area and=20 can be easily made conductive.
 
That's a kilowatt of potential power per gram of electrode, folks, = even=20 without the benefit of hybridiztion.... therefore, to all the LENR = experimenters=20 out there, if you ever run out of good ideas, forget the old = electrolysis=20 cell, order some fullerenes, and get those brains (and bowels)=20 cranking...
 
 
------=_NextPart_000_0071_01C3FF71.49211CC0-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 1 10:14:25 2004 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) id KAA09795; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 10:11:35 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 10:11:35 -0800 Message-ID: <20040301181115.49994.qmail web11705.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 10:11:15 -0800 (PST) From: alexander hollins Subject: dry ice/alchohol liquid nitrogen To: vortex-l eskimo.com In-Reply-To: <007401c3ffb4$57d244e0$8837fea9 cpq> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Resent-Message-ID: <"tLBZs2.0.yO2.MptG01" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53321 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: well, i decided to have fun, and try out the rubbing alchohol dry ice idea that bill beaty has up on amasci, and had some interesting results. i used simple 70 percent isopropal from the store. I figured that i could precipitate ice crystals out, thus increasing the [alchohol]. The first run, i poured the alchohol directly from the bottle at room temperature over the dry ice in a plastic container. (using used and well cleaned gatorade bottles, the new ones with the multilayer plastic, better insulation.) first observations are that there was less bubbling than with straight water, and almost no fog in the bubbles. pretty much expected. after letting aprox 1 pound of ice melt into 2 cups of alchohol, i ended up with an ice cold solution that had turned cloudy with small particulates. i assumed that these were ice crystals, and attempted to filter the liquid. i had a fine cloth already in the freezer for just such a task if needed (dont have any good filtering equipment.) and ran the liquid through the cloth. no change, so obviously the crystals were too small. i had a thought that if perhaps the whole of the alchohol were already ice cold, the water would freeze in larger amounts, making it removable. taking a new sample of alchohol, i set it in my freezer for 4 hours. i then began putting small chunks of dry ice in. lo and behold, it appeared that ice began forming on the dry ice much as it does in pure water. upon periodically removing the dry ice to clean it, though, i notice it was NOT ice, but a very cold gel of some kind. ocasionaly clear, but mostly cloudy at first. setting this gel in a seperate container to melt, after melting it appeared to be the same con of alchohol and water as the original. i did not have a hydrometer to verify, i do now, and will repeat when i get a chance. after a while, i ended up with the whole bottle gelling up around the dry ice, attempts to squeeze seperate it failed. the gel WAS cold though. filling a test tube (1/2 inch) with water, and inserting it into the gel (which was dense enough to support it) the sample was rimmed with ice on the inside to about half of its thickness in one minute, and frozen solid in five. im not sure if the gelling up is sue to the water content, or perhaps due to the c02 that was dissolved into the solution. also, after the entire bottle was gelled, it was almost uniformly clear, opposite of the first portions that gelled. followups that i have planned is cooling the alchohol indirectly, to prevent co2 from getting in in as high a concentration, and trying to get my hands on a higher concentration alchohol. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Get better spam protection with Yahoo! Mail. http://antispam.yahoo.com/tools From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 1 10:44:20 2004 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) id KAA32660; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 10:38:43 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 10:38:43 -0800 Message-ID: <4043830E.3000301 rtpatlanta.com> Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 13:38:06 -0500 From: "Terry Blanton" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: dry ice/alchohol liquid nitrogen References: <20040301181115.49994.qmail web11705.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20040301181115.49994.qmail web11705.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"jmono3.0.C-7.oCuG01" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53322 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: alexander hollins wrote: >followups that i have planned is cooling the alchohol >indirectly, to prevent co2 from getting in in as high >a concentration, and trying to get my hands on a >higher concentration alchohol. > Everclear or Golden Grain from your local spirit dealer is 95% ethanol. And you can drink to your successes or failures! From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 1 11:26:44 2004 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) id LAA04133; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 11:21:05 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 11:21:05 -0800 Reply-To: From: "Keith Nagel" To: Subject: RE: NASA's Silence Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 14:45:58 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 In-Reply-To: <40434955.7060303 rtpatlanta.com> Importance: Normal X-Rcpt-To: Resent-Message-ID: <"rMxJS.0.X01.WquG01" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53323 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: But Terry, we knew about this _days_ ago... "I also asked if there was any compelling spectroscopy from the rovers and he said that they're finding basalt in the surrounding environment, but have only starting the up-close work now, with Opportunity on El Capitan. They plan on having a press conference on Tuesday, and he said, "Don't miss it!". -snowdog- BTW a new study proves H2O2 present on mars. I'll bet the upcoming press conference will be about the discovery of martian free energy Sparberinos! K. -----Original Message----- From: Terry Blanton [mailto:blantont rtpatlanta.com] Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 9:32 AM To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: NASA's Silence While some here have been speculating about a coverup since NASA hasn't been too forthcoming with the tantalizing data, this article implies that some major announcements may be coming this week: http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/opportunity_evidence_040229.html From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 1 11:54:45 2004 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) id LAA29161; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 11:51:39 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 11:51:39 -0800 From: "explorecraft" To: Subject: RE: NASA's Silence Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 02:49:47 +0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <40434955.7060303 rtpatlanta.com> X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Importance: Normal X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - lester.switchfusion.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - eskimo.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - explorecraft.com Resent-Message-ID: <"xdc6H.0.U77.AHvG01" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53324 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: I know I promised, but 1M131296201EFF0500P2933M2M1.jpg has crystals, cubic facets if my eyes aren't shot. Meaning salt, grown by dessication? in all probablility. Out of solution, not necessarily not exclusively but most likely some solution of water-borne salts. Look carfully and you will see the growth steps. Green/blue features probably have some amounts of ferrous and cupric chlorides, both hydrous mineral. And by the way Horace, the official version is spherules form like raindrops growing out of the soil, your version is they grow like grapes. Your version wins, because the only way their growth remains smoothly spherical is by having a skin. If they were sublimated/evaporated, they would have crystal-facet step features, not spherical. Water would have no way to sublimate/evaorate and retain sherical shape by natural process growing from the inside. And they certinly wouldn't slump, as some appear to have done. I wanted to highlight the (?five-sided?) groove-facets I see in those things, but I simply have no time to do that. It's water borne, and its got life. Cheers Back to my Tesla coil... > -----Original Message----- > From: Terry Blanton [mailto:blantont rtpatlanta.com] > Sent: Monday, 2004 March 01 21:32 > To: vortex-l eskimo.com > Subject: NASA's Silence > > > While some here have been speculating about a coverup since NASA hasn't > been too forthcoming with the tantalizing data, this article implies > that some major announcements may be coming this week: > > http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/opportunity_evidence_040229.html > > > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 1 12:28:59 2004 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) id MAA19635; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 12:23:24 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 12:23:24 -0800 Message-Id: <6.0.1.1.2.20040301151321.01cb6210 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell mindspring.com@pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.1.1 Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 15:23:22 -0500 To: vortex-L eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: Message sent to Mark Goldes about magic magnet motor Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <"nd2622.0.ko4.ykvG01" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53325 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: I sent the attached message to Mark Goldes about the claim he made here. However, I missed the web site address he is talking about. I still can't find it in the message stream. Maybe he is describing someone else's web site, not his own, and maybe he cannot address my questions. I apologize to Mark if he means someone else is selling this. Also, I would like to know who it is. If this is Mark, and the gadget works as advertised, he could to sell ten thousand of them in no time, at a huge profit. I thought he is in the magnet business, so I cannot understand why he wouldn't want to sell them. I agree with Explorecraft that this has the hallmarks of a scam. Even though I have not seen the photos he refers to, I already get that impression. If this is an honest, legitimate claim, the authors should make haste to correct this impression. Terry Blanton said this gadget was described in 1980. Does anyone know if there reports that it worked? Goldes said that he (or whoever it is) do not claim they invented it, and it has been around since the 1930s, so the authors are not trying to get away with anything on that score. - Jed - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mark, Have you actually seen and operated one of these things? Will you offer a money back guarantee that it works? How long did it spin in the longest test you tried? I hope you realize this is a very fishy claim you are making. Why on earth would you not be willing to assemble and sell more of these things?!? Even if you have no patent for the device, you could easily make millions of dollars selling them. People make money selling popcorn, which was not invented lately. You could make tens of millions improving the gadgets. I would happy to pay $2,000 for an assembled, tested gadget that you certify will work. You send me the gadget first. I will pay if it works, or return it if it does not. - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 1 12:38:29 2004 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) id MAA28813; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 12:35:39 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 12:35:39 -0800 X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 11:40:45 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: NASA's Silence Resent-Message-ID: <"-whyP2.0.927.RwvG01" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53326 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 9:31 AM 3/1/4, Terry Blanton wrote: >While some here have been speculating about a coverup since NASA hasn't >been too forthcoming with the tantalizing data, this article implies >that some major announcements may be coming this week: > >http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/opportunity_evidence_040229.html Good grief! Could it be that those who see the possibility of flowing water, sublimating ice, desert varnish and lichen-like stuff in the rover photos will be annexed into the mainstream from the lunatic fringe? 8^) Only time will tell. BTW, I have a little bit of a personal relation to some of Gilbert Levine's work, who's Viking Lander background is discussed at the above URL and associated links. Of course he doesn't know me but I was an investor in his company, and that had a profound effect on me. His company (now Spherix) was then called Biospherics (stock symbol BSPR). I sold my house and put the proceeds into BSPR because I thought it had a great chance to take off. Even as a kid, when I read about left handed molecules, I could see the tremendous financial potential for foodstuf that had no calories, that could not be digested. So, when I read that Levine had not only synthesized left handed sugar but had a process to mass produce it, and was awaiting FDA approval, I put every spare dollar I could muster into his stock (this was back in the early 80's). I think he called the sugar by the name l-sugar. Unfortunately, FDA approval was late in coming and in the meantime other artificial sweeteners (e.g. aspartane/neutrasweet) were FDA approved and then selected by the beverage industry. This dropped the potential market for hs product and BSPR stock fell. I held on about two years when a recovery occurred, and sold off my stock and bought a house. I've been out of the stock market and into real estate ever since that timeframe, and without regrets about the move. I missed the biggest bull market in history, but also missed some big falls. When I was younger I would have enjoyed the excitement, but now I appreciate realibility. L-sugar was (is) in all ways exactly like sugar. It bakes, carmelizes, makes syrup, candies, jellies and frostings, and tastes just like the regular stuff, though it has zero calories. The only known down side for some individuals was flatulance! 8^) If you are as overweight as I, that seems a small price to pay for a little sugar! Might not be so great in a work environment though. 8^) I read at one point where the l-sugar production was split off into another company, but do not know if, when or to whom it was sold, or what its name is currently. I think at the same time the name Biospherics was changed to Spherix, and the BSPR symbol went away, but am not sure. I will be very happy to see Levine's work and conclusions proven valid at long last. It is so disgusting when scientists dismiss good working hypotheses without solid contradictory evidence. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 1 12:44:27 2004 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) id MAA01192; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 12:41:16 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 12:41:16 -0800 From: Erikbaard aol.com Message-ID: <38.42da1547.2d74f9c2 aol.com> Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 15:40:34 EST Subject: NASA release To: vortex-l eskimo.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_38.42da1547.2d74f9c2_boundary" X-Mailer: 8.0 for Windows sub 6024 Resent-Message-ID: <"Q7E9Z.0.aI.i_vG01" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53327 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: --part1_38.42da1547.2d74f9c2_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi All -=20 The SPACE.com story was annoying because NASA scientists asked us all to hol= d=20 back until they had their data nailed down. Anyway, the flood gates (pun=20 intended) will open tomorrow. Erik Baard THE FOLLOWING RELEASE WAS RECEIVED FROM NASA HEADQUARTERS, IN WASHINGTON,=20 DC, AND IS FORWARDED FOR YOUR INFORMATION.=A0 (FORWARDING DOES NOT IMPLY=20 ENDORSEMENT BY THE AMERICAN ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY.)=A0 Steve Maran,=20 American Astronomical Society Donald Savage=20 Headquarters, Washington=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 March 1, 200= 4 (Phone: 202/358-1547) Guy Webster Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif. (Phone: 818/354-5011) NOTE TO EDITORS: N04-038 NASA HEADQUARTERS MARS-ROVER OPPORTUNITY PRESS BRIEFING MARCH 2 =A0 =A0=A0 Significant findings from NASA's Mars Exploration Rover=20 Opportunity, now exploring Meridiani Planum on Mars, will be=20 announced at a press briefing at 2 p.m. EST, Tuesday, March 2,=20 2004, at NASA Headquarters, Washington. The briefing will originate from the James E. Webb Auditorium,=20 300 E St., S.W., Washington, and will be carried live on NASA=20 TV with two-way question-and-answer capability for reporters=20 covering the event from participating NASA centers. Dr. Ed Weiler, Associate Administrator, Office of Space Science=20 at NASA Headquarters, will make opening remarks. The panelists=20 include: --Professor Steve Squyres, Mars Exploration Rover (MER)=20 Principal Investigator, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y. --Professor John Grotzinger, MER science team geologist,=20 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass. --Dr. Benton C. Clark III, MER science team member and Chief=20 Scientist of Space Exploration, Lockheed Martin Space Systems=20 Astronautics Operations, Denver --Dr. Joy Crisp, MER Project Scientist, NASA's Jet Propulsion=20 Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif. --Dr. Jim Garvin, Lead Scientist for Mars and the Moon, NASA=20 Headquarters NASA Television is available on AMC-9, transponder 9C, C-Band,=20 located at 85 degrees west longitude. The frequency is 3880.0=20 MHz. Polarization is vertical, and audio is monaural at 6.80=20 MHz. Audio of the broadcast will be available on voice circuit=20 at the Kennedy Space Center on 321/867-1220. For a live webcast of the briefing and information about NASA=20 TV on the Internet, visit: http://www.nasa.gov/ntv --part1_38.42da1547.2d74f9c2_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi All -

The SPACE.com story was annoying because NASA scientists asked us all to hol= d back until they had their data nailed down.  Anyway, the flood gates=20= (pun intended) will open tomorrow.

Erik Baard


THE FOLLOWING RELEASE WAS RECEIVED FROM NASA HEADQUARTERS, IN WASHINGTON, DC, AND IS FORWARDED FOR YOUR INFORMATION.=A0 (FORWARDING DOES NOT IMPLY ENDORSEMENT BY THE AMERICAN ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY.)=A0 Steve Maran,
American Astronomical Society

Donald Savage
Headquarters, Washington=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 March 1, 200= 4
(Phone: 202/358-1547)

Guy Webster
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif.
(Phone: 818/354-5011)

NOTE TO EDITORS: N04-038

NASA HEADQUARTERS MARS-ROVER OPPORTUNITY PRESS BRIEFING MARCH 2

=A0 =A0=A0 Significant findings from NASA's Mars Exploration Rover
Opportunity, now exploring Meridiani Planum on Mars, will be
announced at a press briefing at 2 p.m. EST, Tuesday, March 2,
2004, at NASA Headquarters, Washington.

The briefing will originate from the James E. Webb Auditorium,
300 E St., S.W., Washington, and will be carried live on NASA
TV with two-way question-and-answer capability for reporters
covering the event from participating NASA centers.

Dr. Ed Weiler, Associate Administrator, Office of Space Science
at NASA Headquarters, will make opening remarks. The panelists
include:

--Professor Steve Squyres, Mars Exploration Rover (MER)
Principal Investigator, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y.
--Professor John Grotzinger, MER science team geologist,
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass.
--Dr. Benton C. Clark III, MER science team member and Chief
Scientist of Space Exploration, Lockheed Martin Space Systems
Astronautics Operations, Denver
--Dr. Joy Crisp, MER Project Scientist, NASA's Jet Propulsion
Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif.
--Dr. Jim Garvin, Lead Scientist for Mars and the Moon, NASA
Headquarters

NASA Television is available on AMC-9, transponder 9C, C-Band,
located at 85 degrees west longitude. The frequency is 3880.0
MHz. Polarization is vertical, and audio is monaural at 6.80
MHz. Audio of the broadcast will be available on voice circuit
at the Kennedy Space Center on 321/867-1220.

For a live webcast of the briefing and information about NASA
TV on the Internet, visit:

http://www.nasa.gov/ntv


--part1_38.42da1547.2d74f9c2_boundary-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 1 12:44:41 2004 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) id MAA02735; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 12:42:34 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 12:42:34 -0800 From: Erikbaard aol.com Message-ID: <155.2eb4018c.2d74fa13 aol.com> Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 15:41:55 EST Subject: NASA release To: vortex-l eskimo.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_155.2eb4018c.2d74fa13_boundary" X-Mailer: 8.0 for Windows sub 6024 Resent-Message-ID: <"EOLkL1.0.cg.w0wG01" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53328 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: --part1_155.2eb4018c.2d74fa13_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi All -=20 The SPACE.com story was annoying because NASA scientists asked us all to hol= d=20 back until they had their data nailed down. Anyway, the flood gates (pun=20 intended) will open tomorrow. Erik Baard THE FOLLOWING RELEASE WAS RECEIVED FROM NASA HEADQUARTERS, IN WASHINGTON,=20 DC, AND IS FORWARDED FOR YOUR INFORMATION.=A0 (FORWARDING DOES NOT IMPLY=20 ENDORSEMENT BY THE AMERICAN ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY.)=A0 Steve Maran,=20 American Astronomical Society Donald Savage=20 Headquarters, Washington=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 March 1, 200= 4 (Phone: 202/358-1547) Guy Webster Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif. (Phone: 818/354-5011) NOTE TO EDITORS: N04-038 NASA HEADQUARTERS MARS-ROVER OPPORTUNITY PRESS BRIEFING MARCH 2 =A0 =A0=A0 Significant findings from NASA's Mars Exploration Rover=20 Opportunity, now exploring Meridiani Planum on Mars, will be=20 announced at a press briefing at 2 p.m. EST, Tuesday, March 2,=20 2004, at NASA Headquarters, Washington. The briefing will originate from the James E. Webb Auditorium,=20 300 E St., S.W., Washington, and will be carried live on NASA=20 TV with two-way question-and-answer capability for reporters=20 covering the event from participating NASA centers. Dr. Ed Weiler, Associate Administrator, Office of Space Science=20 at NASA Headquarters, will make opening remarks. The panelists=20 include: --Professor Steve Squyres, Mars Exploration Rover (MER)=20 Principal Investigator, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y. --Professor John Grotzinger, MER science team geologist,=20 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass. --Dr. Benton C. Clark III, MER science team member and Chief=20 Scientist of Space Exploration, Lockheed Martin Space Systems=20 Astronautics Operations, Denver --Dr. Joy Crisp, MER Project Scientist, NASA's Jet Propulsion=20 Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif. --Dr. Jim Garvin, Lead Scientist for Mars and the Moon, NASA=20 Headquarters NASA Television is available on AMC-9, transponder 9C, C-Band,=20 located at 85 degrees west longitude. The frequency is 3880.0=20 MHz. Polarization is vertical, and audio is monaural at 6.80=20 MHz. Audio of the broadcast will be available on voice circuit=20 at the Kennedy Space Center on 321/867-1220. For a live webcast of the briefing and information about NASA=20 TV on the Internet, visit: http://www.nasa.gov/ntv --part1_155.2eb4018c.2d74fa13_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi All -

The SPACE.com story was annoying because NASA scientists asked us all to hol= d back until they had their data nailed down.  Anyway, the flood gates=20= (pun intended) will open tomorrow.

Erik Baard


THE FOLLOWING RELEASE WAS RECEIVED FROM NASA HEADQUARTERS, IN WASHINGTON, DC, AND IS FORWARDED FOR YOUR INFORMATION.=A0 (FORWARDING DOES NOT IMPLY ENDORSEMENT BY THE AMERICAN ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY.)=A0 Steve Maran,
American Astronomical Society

Donald Savage
Headquarters, Washington=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 March 1, 200= 4
(Phone: 202/358-1547)

Guy Webster
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif.
(Phone: 818/354-5011)

NOTE TO EDITORS: N04-038

NASA HEADQUARTERS MARS-ROVER OPPORTUNITY PRESS BRIEFING MARCH 2

=A0 =A0=A0 Significant findings from NASA's Mars Exploration Rover
Opportunity, now exploring Meridiani Planum on Mars, will be
announced at a press briefing at 2 p.m. EST, Tuesday, March 2,
2004, at NASA Headquarters, Washington.

The briefing will originate from the James E. Webb Auditorium,
300 E St., S.W., Washington, and will be carried live on NASA
TV with two-way question-and-answer capability for reporters
covering the event from participating NASA centers.

Dr. Ed Weiler, Associate Administrator, Office of Space Science
at NASA Headquarters, will make opening remarks. The panelists
include:

--Professor Steve Squyres, Mars Exploration Rover (MER)
Principal Investigator, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y.
--Professor John Grotzinger, MER science team geologist,
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass.
--Dr. Benton C. Clark III, MER science team member and Chief
Scientist of Space Exploration, Lockheed Martin Space Systems
Astronautics Operations, Denver
--Dr. Joy Crisp, MER Project Scientist, NASA's Jet Propulsion
Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif.
--Dr. Jim Garvin, Lead Scientist for Mars and the Moon, NASA
Headquarters

NASA Television is available on AMC-9, transponder 9C, C-Band,
located at 85 degrees west longitude. The frequency is 3880.0
MHz. Polarization is vertical, and audio is monaural at 6.80
MHz. Audio of the broadcast will be available on voice circuit
at the Kennedy Space Center on 321/867-1220.

For a live webcast of the briefing and information about NASA
TV on the Internet, visit:

http://www.nasa.gov/ntv


--part1_155.2eb4018c.2d74fa13_boundary-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 1 12:52:30 2004 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) id MAA08536; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 12:49:32 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 12:49:32 -0800 X-Originating-IP: [67.74.51.187] X-Originating-Email: [mgoldes msn.com] X-Sender: mgoldes msn.com From: "Mark Goldes" To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: RE: Magnetic motor URL is: http://www.magnethealer.com/learn.html Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 12:48:44 -0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Mar 2004 20:48:44.0530 (UTC) FILETIME=[963AFD20:01C3FFCE] Resent-Message-ID: <"-HKvL1.0.K52.R7wG01" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53329 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Jed, Jones figured out the URL yesterday. I accidently had omitted it from my earlier post. I confirmed he was correct last evening. One of our engineers had ordered the booklet and we will see what come of it. This might well be a scam. If it should happen to be real, our firm would be delighted, but we are a licensing firm and not in the magnet business. We will leave sales to others. We do hope to develop toys of this general nature that we will license in the future. Our business is the development and licensing of self-powered generators(tm). We hope to have practical multi-kilowatt magnetic generators under license by the end of the year. We are not seeking publicity about our work, but plan to leave that to licensees. We also are developing Ultraconductors(tm) through a subsidiary. These are a practical equivalent of ambient temperature superconductors. see www.ultraconductors.com for more information. Mark Mark Goldes Chairman & CEO Magnetic Power Inc. Room Temperature Superconductors Inc. >From: Jed Rothwell >Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com >To: vortex-L eskimo.com >Subject: Message sent to Mark Goldes about magic magnet motor >Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 15:23:22 -0500 > >I sent the attached message to Mark Goldes about the claim he made here. >However, I missed the web site address he is talking about. I still can't >find it in the message stream. Maybe he is describing someone else's web >site, not his own, and maybe he cannot address my questions. > >I apologize to Mark if he means someone else is selling this. Also, I would >like to know who it is. > >If this is Mark, and the gadget works as advertised, he could to sell ten >thousand of them in no time, at a huge profit. I thought he is in the >magnet business, so I cannot understand why he wouldn't want to sell them. > >I agree with Explorecraft that this has the hallmarks of a scam. Even >though I have not seen the photos he refers to, I already get that >impression. If this is an honest, legitimate claim, the authors should make >haste to correct this impression. > >Terry Blanton said this gadget was described in 1980. Does anyone know if >there reports that it worked? Goldes said that he (or whoever it is) do not >claim they invented it, and it has been around since the 1930s, so the >authors are not trying to get away with anything on that score. > >- Jed > >- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > >Mark, > >Have you actually seen and operated one of these things? Will you offer a >money back guarantee that it works? How long did it spin in the longest >test you tried? > >I hope you realize this is a very fishy claim you are making. Why on earth >would you not be willing to assemble and sell more of these things?!? Even >if you have no patent for the device, you could easily make millions of >dollars selling them. People make money selling popcorn, which was not >invented lately. You could make tens of millions improving the gadgets. > >I would happy to pay $2,000 for an assembled, tested gadget that you >certify will work. You send me the gadget first. I will pay if it works, or >return it if it does not. > >- Jed > > _________________________________________________________________ Watch high-quality video with fast playback at MSN Video. Free! http://click.atdmt.com/AVE/go/onm00200365ave/direct/01/ From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 1 12:54:07 2004 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) id MAA09409; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 12:50:59 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 12:50:59 -0800 From: Erikbaard aol.com Message-ID: <1ee.1a57eef9.2d74fc06 aol.com> Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 15:50:14 EST Subject: NASA release To: vortex-l eskimo.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_1ee.1a57eef9.2d74fc06_boundary" X-Mailer: 8.0 for Windows sub 6024 Resent-Message-ID: <"ZUbRe1.0.tI2.p8wG01" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53330 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: --part1_1ee.1a57eef9.2d74fc06_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi All -=20 The SPACE.com story was annoying because NASA scientists asked us all to hol= d=20 back until they had their data nailed down. Anyway, the flood gates (pun=20 intended) will open tomorrow. Erik Baard THE FOLLOWING RELEASE WAS RECEIVED FROM NASA HEADQUARTERS, IN WASHINGTON,=20 DC, AND IS FORWARDED FOR YOUR INFORMATION.=A0 (FORWARDING DOES NOT IMPLY=20 ENDORSEMENT BY THE AMERICAN ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY.)=A0 Steve Maran,=20 American Astronomical Society Donald Savage=20 Headquarters, Washington=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 March 1, 200= 4 (Phone: 202/358-1547) Guy Webster Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif. (Phone: 818/354-5011) NOTE TO EDITORS: N04-038 NASA HEADQUARTERS MARS-ROVER OPPORTUNITY PRESS BRIEFING MARCH 2 =A0 =A0=A0 Significant findings from NASA's Mars Exploration Rover=20 Opportunity, now exploring Meridiani Planum on Mars, will be=20 announced at a press briefing at 2 p.m. EST, Tuesday, March 2,=20 2004, at NASA Headquarters, Washington. The briefing will originate from the James E. Webb Auditorium,=20 300 E St., S.W., Washington, and will be carried live on NASA=20 TV with two-way question-and-answer capability for reporters=20 covering the event from participating NASA centers. Dr. Ed Weiler, Associate Administrator, Office of Space Science=20 at NASA Headquarters, will make opening remarks. The panelists=20 include: --Professor Steve Squyres, Mars Exploration Rover (MER)=20 Principal Investigator, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y. --Professor John Grotzinger, MER science team geologist,=20 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass. --Dr. Benton C. Clark III, MER science team member and Chief=20 Scientist of Space Exploration, Lockheed Martin Space Systems=20 Astronautics Operations, Denver --Dr. Joy Crisp, MER Project Scientist, NASA's Jet Propulsion=20 Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif. --Dr. Jim Garvin, Lead Scientist for Mars and the Moon, NASA=20 Headquarters NASA Television is available on AMC-9, transponder 9C, C-Band,=20 located at 85 degrees west longitude. The frequency is 3880.0=20 MHz. Polarization is vertical, and audio is monaural at 6.80=20 MHz. Audio of the broadcast will be available on voice circuit=20 at the Kennedy Space Center on 321/867-1220. For a live webcast of the briefing and information about NASA=20 TV on the Internet, visit: http://www.nasa.gov/ntv --part1_1ee.1a57eef9.2d74fc06_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi All -

The SPACE.com story was annoying because NASA scientists asked us all to hol= d back until they had their data nailed down.  Anyway, the flood gates=20= (pun intended) will open tomorrow.

Erik Baard


THE FOLLOWING RELEASE WAS RECEIVED FROM NASA HEADQUARTERS, IN WASHINGTON, DC, AND IS FORWARDED FOR YOUR INFORMATION.=A0 (FORWARDING DOES NOT IMPLY ENDORSEMENT BY THE AMERICAN ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY.)=A0 Steve Maran,
American Astronomical Society

Donald Savage
Headquarters, Washington=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 March 1, 200= 4
(Phone: 202/358-1547)

Guy Webster
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif.
(Phone: 818/354-5011)

NOTE TO EDITORS: N04-038

NASA HEADQUARTERS MARS-ROVER OPPORTUNITY PRESS BRIEFING MARCH 2

=A0 =A0=A0 Significant findings from NASA's Mars Exploration Rover
Opportunity, now exploring Meridiani Planum on Mars, will be
announced at a press briefing at 2 p.m. EST, Tuesday, March 2,
2004, at NASA Headquarters, Washington.

The briefing will originate from the James E. Webb Auditorium,
300 E St., S.W., Washington, and will be carried live on NASA
TV with two-way question-and-answer capability for reporters
covering the event from participating NASA centers.

Dr. Ed Weiler, Associate Administrator, Office of Space Science
at NASA Headquarters, will make opening remarks. The panelists
include:

--Professor Steve Squyres, Mars Exploration Rover (MER)
Principal Investigator, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y.
--Professor John Grotzinger, MER science team geologist,
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass.
--Dr. Benton C. Clark III, MER science team member and Chief
Scientist of Space Exploration, Lockheed Martin Space Systems
Astronautics Operations, Denver
--Dr. Joy Crisp, MER Project Scientist, NASA's Jet Propulsion
Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif.
--Dr. Jim Garvin, Lead Scientist for Mars and the Moon, NASA
Headquarters

NASA Television is available on AMC-9, transponder 9C, C-Band,
located at 85 degrees west longitude. The frequency is 3880.0
MHz. Polarization is vertical, and audio is monaural at 6.80
MHz. Audio of the broadcast will be available on voice circuit
at the Kennedy Space Center on 321/867-1220.

For a live webcast of the briefing and information about NASA
TV on the Internet, visit:

http://www.nasa.gov/ntv


--part1_1ee.1a57eef9.2d74fc06_boundary-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 1 13:04:59 2004 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) id NAA16924; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 13:00:18 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 13:00:18 -0800 Message-ID: <4043A4A2.9030905 pobox.com> Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 16:01:22 -0500 From: "Stephen A. Lawrence" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: NASA's Silence References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"VV3uE3.0.O84.YHwG01" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53331 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Horace Heffner wrote: > ... So, when I read that Levine had not only > synthesized left handed sugar but had a process to mass produce it... I'm confused. Which sugar is it that he inverted to form "left handed" sugar? I thought the mirror of dextrose, aka glucose, was levulose, aka fructose, which is found in most fruit. It's eminently digestable, of course. Sucrose (table sugar), IIRC, is dextrose and levulose linked, and hence (I would have thought!) is its own mirror image. So, "L-sugar" is not the inverse of any of the "common three" small sugars. Presumably, it's something quite a bit bigger -- yes? From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 1 13:13:19 2004 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) id NAA24115; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 13:10:20 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 13:10:20 -0800 Message-ID: <20040301211016.94782.qmail web11708.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 13:10:16 -0800 (PST) From: alexander hollins Subject: Re: dry ice/alchohol liquid nitrogen To: vortex-l eskimo.com In-Reply-To: <4043830E.3000301 rtpatlanta.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Resent-Message-ID: <"fdsy2.0.ku5.xQwG01" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53332 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: good point. and i intend too. but i also want to get some higher con isopropal. the gelling effect interests me, and i want to see if it still happens. --- Terry Blanton wrote: > alexander hollins wrote: > > >followups that i have planned is cooling the > alchohol > >indirectly, to prevent co2 from getting in in as > high > >a concentration, and trying to get my hands on a > >higher concentration alchohol. > > > > Everclear or Golden Grain from your local spirit > dealer is 95% ethanol. > > And you can drink to your successes or failures! > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Get better spam protection with Yahoo! Mail. http://antispam.yahoo.com/tools From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 1 13:29:47 2004 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) id NAA05322; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 13:27:36 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 13:27:36 -0800 Message-ID: <4043AAA5.1040600 rtpatlanta.com> Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 16:27:01 -0500 From: "Terry Blanton" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Standing Water Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"AHakW2.0.6J1.7hwG01" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53333 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Call me crazy, but this sure looks like standing water around this rock: >http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/p/036/1P131377170EFF0500P2532R1M1.JPG< Notice some of the spherules seem to be submerged. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 1 13:40:59 2004 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) id NAA14998; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 13:37:46 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 13:37:46 -0800 Message-ID: <4043AD0B.7030001 rtpatlanta.com> Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 16:37:15 -0500 From: "Terry Blanton" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Standing Water from Surveyor Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------060601070103060004020105" Resent-Message-ID: <"kPPtq2.0.Eg3.fqwG01" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53334 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------060601070103060004020105 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Someone claimed they found standing water in Surveyor images (small attachment). --------------060601070103060004020105 Content-Type: image/jpeg; name="LakeStedman_sm.jpg" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline; filename="LakeStedman_sm.jpg" /9j/4AAQSkZJRgABAQEAYABgAAD/2wBDAAMCAgMCAgMDAwMEAwMEBQgFBQQEBQoHBwYIDAoM DAsKCwsNDhIQDQ4RDgsLEBYQERMUFRUVDA8XGBYUGBIUFRT/2wBDAQMEBAUEBQkFBQkUDQsN FBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBT/wAAR CADHAP0DASIAAhEBAxEB/8QAHwAAAQUBAQEBAQEAAAAAAAAAAAECAwQFBgcICQoL/8QAtRAA AgEDAwIEAwUFBAQAAAF9AQIDAAQRBRIhMUEGE1FhByJxFDKBkaEII0KxwRVS0fAkM2JyggkK FhcYGRolJicoKSo0NTY3ODk6Q0RFRkdISUpTVFVWV1hZWmNkZWZnaGlqc3R1dnd4eXqDhIWG h4iJipKTlJWWl5iZmqKjpKWmp6ipqrKztLW2t7i5usLDxMXGx8jJytLT1NXW19jZ2uHi4+Tl 5ufo6erx8vP09fb3+Pn6/8QAHwEAAwEBAQEBAQEBAQAAAAAAAAECAwQFBgcICQoL/8QAtREA AgECBAQDBAcFBAQAAQJ3AAECAxEEBSExBhJBUQdhcRMiMoEIFEKRobHBCSMzUvAVYnLRChYk NOEl8RcYGRomJygpKjU2Nzg5OkNERUZHSElKU1RVVldYWVpjZGVmZ2hpanN0dXZ3eHl6goOE hYaHiImKkpOUlZaXmJmaoqOkpaanqKmqsrO0tba3uLm6wsPExcbHyMnK0tPU1dbX2Nna4uPk 5ebn6Onq8vP09fb3+Pn6/9oADAMBAAIRAxEAPwD5ZF2u4zScseFz3UcZpL6I6da2nAdlkEkh YZBQ1Un2yXKZwsEMfBHfPQVZa4+02UaP8/RTu5yK8w+jJrqKO3u5GjG5PL3KDVeymD2xdlDM 4G5SM8etF40kQ6ZIHX2PSqtmGjVlJO4fKaALtwqTIqqAdvQ4/WpId0mCxLbeDnvTbaEkL6Yq wsTw5O3g80APnY7bQg4+ZsYo6gZ5x60PzDnHTke30qC2uY54j83KOVP4UASsgdg+OFpzqkUZ y3EnzY7c1p2lkl27YAESruYgVkDYserxyn7YZpojasvy+SgHIH9cdaAI5oN0Kp1jHIU9BTtr WkUTbQwY8hRz+NIpZf8AWEhe1XreEMFI+71FAFy3iEmGC7d3OMdK0La0VT5sigjoFI4NTWNs GgBIBOOpq9HZF4cnnHIz2oJbsOgtTPGsSxKGI6ha19F8GXqrfXyKWNrF5ir/AHu5q34ZWLaG cB5Rwdwzj3rqX1dtMtZ0idtroUYA/wAJGP5UGbdzhbHxhD4itVuIVA3nlB0BPaklgkkuZZJF 2xRKRn1J6CsS20X/AIR68eG1QJAzlwcYAOe1dbHcxjTm80iR5ANytyN1BJkaV4iFiogmUKyf KPf3rt/DXiCDTYZbsqgYplVQYOcf4V57eWirfpLIisGQfeGeakjuGhXZG2I/4s9c+1AEl+tr da7/AGi8WGYlVKDDKD2z/SrQtAsbxoCYn6buw7Cssz7ZR5RLtu3FSe3rWnBfvcK642gE4I70 AYd/4ZttSwklpkxZVDu/UfWuIPg+40XUbtoN0MTNtUIcbAT0FeqCEnB6n1qK9tQ8fzKGzyci gpOx53L4GW1nku0ALlME45zXEQeENUsNcmuSRNBKSyg87cmvZroNEzArIVK5xk4NZkEAY5C4 B5xig0UrmP4XWa1kUTLhl6sepz0re1O3utRYJKweNcKd/O7HTOan+yqRlFBcgZ4qzbWsksqi TIHegG7C6Np5inQtgjr7V7p8OpWSMW78o4BBPavN9N0mOMITgjAxkV6N4FtmubtIomJZcHAP agzlK6PXtM0VruGMtkmNtqSD0rS1NBpiwx3MzKxztGeMcYxU1pcvoOkojqJBPjoOVJrB1fU7 a6uRHqEc0rwjYhUk4X0/Smlc5FufnVcljHNHGilIztww5bH+FJp8RKlMkx/e3tyQfSmuzK8T uxSOJiSwPXPatSxgDTumAsRG/jpmkeiV5GZ2XfyeFIPoO9IYAHkB4WU7Ubvx3qTW4XtbFrvk LEVZz7HjH0ptltu5IcOSqDgZ4FAEwgeySE5LIx5JNXJ90coy2+GTgY7V1XhnRLfUL62trmIt BPuTLDIU7cgiubggEUktuCW8lygZuTwcZoArlTEDb7dxByCwySKyF025S/upIV/c8MY/c9cC t6QEzBmJ3jj60JNIszYXg8E+ntQA06k8dgbSNTG9w3zMvDIB2zWVcCTOVXAHQDsPatOe3aV2 doipycMHxu96iaymaEnBHpzmgCpCxuFCDO4DB38itrTYGVNvDDufT6ViwwuGwSc966jQLVpo yoJ96CW7GrpMT7MoPMVeMHmuhsrP7RFIqgb9u/GOntVLwtAVu2jcYSNiCOxyeM16B4c8Moby 7l3FFhhd23dDnpQZt3OW0uKWEmVYVCogL5Xk1SvPF9nIzHcVXoybOOO1apeR4bOzM6w3Mi+Y JhyskJGAD7+9ecapcXOn3tzczwm0iR2iEMh3CTJwpAoElc6a41KHVUiaOZGTdnavGPwqC7zB MeTsznGeK81F/LZag7OXtbiLKy+Sxw5Y5DbemfWrsnjiWyu7WLU2MkLYxdLwpz0zQVyHb39z u8vJJ4HWq/niqt3NGY0mjm81NoAwcg+9VYZjJlMncfegOQuJdE3eVTy2+7vPcVtW9jM0RkLF U6/KcCsO9gdIofMWTaVGXUnC46Vv2l15ekWdrJ5iXE8bSxlidrIDgYoE1YvWQE9uCOdrbc+t Wrq1QMFJHzcgelZkMiabBcLI5jjlkAQ5xh8ZK1Z0bU49UtrWadGYbSSyduO9BJkeIrgWRVCs hIGAVPGPesmznznzkAVuQ6jgCt7WQ10VgidX88Apu5IFUN1tZ28ltcx/MeDxxQXDcrw/PPut 33ohwzA9adDrkUGpeTcOYlJypfnd+Paq0GmfYnzZXD+TL87R7jx6gVR8S2EmpItxbIHj85So A424yR9aBzPV9HdbuFSACCARXoHw0gkh1rUJAcRx2RkUDruHpXgPwq8a28+o3uhySOk8SrJb +axJKnt9BXuvhO7mtdVtJo18rzi0TspyCufT09qDFux7B8PdXk8Sj7RMFZPmcRS87QPY96k1 Ux6hqEk9tJBbROAeCPmPc1y/g3VYrLU9etA4hSGQ4cfKSrA9PQGsHTwA05t5lli34AkbG3Ge KpOxilZ3PiyTS3e7ks7lv3cRMo2/xA8jPrW/pGmSFEJAMRALA/eFULSWS71N5pYhHIreSU9h xXcaNpMspZWUrv5jkXjpUnc3Y5/xLpEtzoV3awRhklgPBHzHDZB+uK5jwnplxIm6VDEhfgnr ivYhZeYfMYASAbBgdfWsXV7T7FaBUhRZS+CAoH40E85Paa3baLBbR7WeWPd83fOMD8q5OK3M 008kYKs7liW9zWrDp++T9+52DkMT+lTyxIFx5TH3A60BzmXJabreMyIocHG8Dk1M9i0AysYZ G5LYq9cWqtbw5JAJHyntT5riOFDCW9gKA5zDurJJYVkKrlGwBjqK0Us92mbgoXJ4wOg9Kvvo 5l05HXD5IIC9au2Ng9tbyLcsnllcqp6j/wCvQHOcNqVqIZMp949cV1Hh+2W2gspGyvm5yx+6 D71m6bYve6+UkUPB5gC4HUZr0HXbKz8P3N/p1yECTwrLbJgfISM8en4UEt3I9LksdMEtxe5N s00cYnX7pbHI/Ou4F5aat4X1WGzuxDeMoUMGwcDqM+lcJ4Wt7XxD4TvfD+okW0H2pJoZjwQx GcA1Rv8ASbjw7II45JGK5QsrH5vQt6mgk6iTwbdXthYSRqp821MamB9oTYfbpmvMPiNd3Fxf W2nSWotbm3P7uQDIJ6ivRdGvr3wtf6dp1y7tFf2wnRixIVgPmA9Mnk+tYutaMPFq6gbeVRqN mWZCPvlckqc9elBcNzzy7Nnr2nzBxHb66/D7lADf7Q964TUrJ7nRL/w3IS9zb4kik9h0FdNc GG+u4ruU7GhVldj13jp+Ga42yvbqDxAby4YtKV8qRM8N70Gps+DfEkseiR2d8pSW3fyy7dPQ V1Vt9qkukEQ8zy2yzL0K+tcxf6KywXdrF+8eeJJcHna2MnFdj8P7hDoMzyti7hXyyvdlAxzQ B3FpOmp2kdlA0btcbQdwBAXv+IrR8cWf9k3OnW0AjvbSDTwsVyAMwtxla81g1V9NvQbaJ/Pv iBbRxjhAPvMuPuk+1dRo2uN/bMmj3f8ApNtcKZY53O7ys8kEmgzmV9Uh1CSGwjmj86GWcSFw OhPf61txAeHr68sLM+dAyh2jIxsz1AqdbqOPVbe2bzG0qGJm88MWYyjhQfr1rmtTupby7jaK 4P2oDZOXbnnpmghK5pWiC6vJN8YgMbHyCOoGeBms3xeZ9M+zLLD5nnkHfjJQn1PpVrTbmR9R gjuzjygZGYfKCvbBFbEk9trdpcXFw25VTEJJyGHqc9aDRRscPdyzW0yrE3MS73wevrj2rR8L 6hBfWM8Kj7M8khnjDHIHrgds1lpBMLu4uQv7u1i8tCfmEg6A4qhZ2csN7Zz6bcbpwgWWNjjk 8nAoG1cXxj4TvrK80vxTpMaW+oW9wtrLGh2JNGRwcDuRXtvwz8bjW4vKib7Ff2mFmjdclSe4 P9a8g8Xa8NWs5NHgJgleVZwV4AcdcV2XwqaUa0904yxQQTfVBgH9KDGUT6LsEj1O6k1Boktn nVopH2jDMvAbFeO+Ob/VvD9/Db28JmDBnZwOpLGvWdGvrc2AhkLiUvkDPf1p0/gCfxNI80c+ 7YzA+YMkZOcU0rmTVj5m0fwyTemWdFbccgKOtdvplqEgkXGzYx2p2H4VY0nRZEdfkGV43AVt 22ivPeALwCfnB6k96Ru3cxotMSO1FwxyxbhD0BqrqGiOY2vJowewVhkV3h8OpcGNcCOCByWy OWNUtdsXWSO0YkKH4z6ZoJPNrHw3Lq9y8YUxg/MAfujHXFX59Hjmj2wttlTjHYkV193arDLP DCfLdI9ylOCfauJvLye2urB0UpdbSGib7jD1x60AcX4jmn0HWEhk/fRuMsBztNSXVp9o02O5 idJLiRSRH/EFzwfritzW4Lae2ubu4hJuHC5XHTPdfSuIlM+leIbdEcswViQPlGz0oGlc7HQ7 mbS9VS0lUtGVBXdzzT/EoeNbqRyY5GIZVHGM1FpN7b65p63MTsLyB8sHbJA+tauspFqccUwI kMiDjqM4oG1Yp+ErF5blJY0yyEM3FW/jLA2sS6Lc25aG/t4DJJIhzuGeAwrqvB+hGx0kzNgy SYwF68Vyfn3EXxD1SS7bZZSQN5a7Og/u0ElPw3qFv4mtL7S/OW1vrZFcO3GZQOorZg1a5u/C 813eW26/gmWNkA4fBwWryG8uH0vXWljikjmWcgnp5qg9T68V7B4O8deHtUgn0u5nIuZpVjti fl3vjLAH2OaAOn1K407xFBp7gqtxYbNrDgquzBFecvHP4Y8WSXYlcRTxbGIJGeK6LV4bSC43 286JONzKqnkqvQE964DXPEt/rK29+qxtZozLKpGWJ9qC4bnLeMVh0u8IWMtBcSlmwOACc4qq 3hyC91O1vVRorRYv3jDkEAcMRWvqUlpquifZ1lLXqc+VKcsB+NSeDpmi8NaukxL7Y2RR1Iz0 FBqYthdmG9MvmG5tiuI50/iTsD74qxb3kGm6i0yXBghlZR8ycHPVSPb1rO+HOmSPps+n3BZR FIZFbPROuTWhdzC/1ZGKK8durxlMZVi3Rseo7UAd1o2nD+3JTbzJLbCOQQbP+WZOfu+n4VzO n3Emmzi1M5F35nluhXkKDiq/grUZtGvTbxMZIYhlpGOWLH3rrZNB3RtrUzNHMwxyecGglq5p XqzeH/8AiZW9wW0sW2+VAu7Mg/ixWNHHHrctxqUBBi1DB3kYbI6kelRx6/dTaPPb20haUsYg pY7WTPcd6X7WulaVbRTxm0aJWk81fus/fA9CaBKNincStp7XOowXBSKECIRucjPQ/TNXLbVn 1XRBDCojaR8Dy+AMdQMVzMZOvaZeRK2UvNspUcKGPJ4q7Ki+GrC2RA4nUgoI5CoC+uBQWarT T+G7BlliGyWU4YjoueB9KpXktjb6kt2hEcsqiXMfy4CjHOPXvW5PMfEegxl1DKmNxPODXFal Yf6dNBCS0RiKhvQ9x+dAEF9Is5k1BUZp4yeB2J9K9L+Feqr4W8Ji+8QRSxS3lztt5Gz83HG4 9xXK/D/w+rRIdVkKW6kbmc/eI9fWuj/aV8U2uj+DvCtpZBXhkJI2jhRjgj8KDOZ6X4D8cDXp RIzhnjfDFTxn29q+hdK1FfscUn2iIGRFYgKARx39TXwJ8GPFMFjbRrDctyRuEjE5PtX1d4Y8 QG909WLBgFUA9e1XE5akXJaF6w8K28Ni3ksLmWQBl42+X7CsryXg1q2AgYi6JCkD7pXrj0rs 9S0y7/si3vbcKI4X8j5Bg/j+Fc3rGutaazpamIr5VwzxxgbQdwyRn0pNWGpplSPVFbUL2NlF xHDITyNuCQOvripPF9lFLfoS+2PayxTA9W2g/Me9VZdRtJE+0XFjIqXFy3moRhogDjr/AHan +IMtro+n6dbGbda3Z3+fIflBA4ANSWnc4vW1nXV4ZRII9ysoUHGa5PVHmki8yVkmaLje3ysn 0NdL4pjaRPD6xEyXN5+8wOCFMhxz16YrE8cWsMmpWEbRFJFLRXUJ/hMZwMfUfnQUUtCjh8SN 9nmc7IUMhmJ5Cgc59cGsC4sre6g8u/UGUo72s4XqAccmtC6s59Msb2ezwN9t5aFeNi55/E96 W8tTd+HIopmC/wCjv9nuF4AkY5YE+9BSdjzgSX3gnxxpkMhMunX4IbaflIPtXodrexpqLWEC DZG5MTOOoz0/CuS8VsF0vSppYWN9YyELGBwU7E/QVc8N6gbuWNvOWd5VLIzcMnzdjQDdz2vT blQtuiNt2qN+3jDY5/WoNX0cXt/JKpDRkKu5eoz1qnaSCKOUwgEAndjnFdL4Fs7kxm4uohJY XF2FVyM49qCG7HOw/C2213xBALmNpolmdxIIt3yhCNpPcZ/Wvl/xDe2ug3en6fNvg1TQ2u5/ MbguplAR8+u3v71+lehz2uh7p4iksIjdxb7QCxPUZr83P2vNLN98SrjXLGM2dtfqsE8CnCwc 8rx6kVSVxJ3M298e3d42nXVpLIEGInO87sdD+ddJZ+JLXT9ROmXKeXaTp5scn3trnkfSuX8L 6DHdajaaOwU3UsfmhVH8OMgrXOeLjd6N4tltpJHkCEfMjHgA96fKaJ2NjVr+aHxPJeFysuQu 5Pl3V6LZNHb+HbgmNlub+Q4KcYweK80iZNY1R1Y/fKbSe2PSvXpYVt/C6PBIrXcb5AblQvbj 1pNWNFK5jTQSaNaQzJKsZIzcr0J3clT6jPaqdyDLOLqw8pIZFCEYAHAxx71Obb+3zJPKRtPD jsTXH6vq7aLM9qoC26SN+Bz1FSUdu4tbXT/tMB8ucbAVPHpzU3ivxtM2nJDAxZAgEmT1OOcV zWi3A1NFSUtJ5yjy2Y54xxmpNX0ia0TyT+8ZDyV60Et2N/wFBPqUAnjZGBmUNGeWAxWl4lLq /wBjmSQwqNyliflHtVL4dWD6ddQXqFo4pGHmBjwPeur8Y6jaLqfkblnEvyIRzx2oJ5zzzSIj YXZaKRmiY5Ck8Yq5rdu08qzOgKyDacj7vpW5H4dMM4QLt2yonTswyBWnbaHZ6jBrEF9MbNLX cqXDN/FxjigOcm+GMUOq6TqGjzPHbTxRmRGcBQePug1ieHvsw1a4guYzLMLpYktxFw+3lyG9 qf8AGDU4PB/gTUraBCupQX9usephdu5OpUexHX1r134Vabpfif4dQ6iYoE1TTpzcgEkHayYk x6CgOc4zx7pum2Xh1rvShKYYUS3uo2O4HL8yoOx968Q+PXiOCfQdHiilMm3ITJ+6MdvSvfdK jtV0rU7V5hIYNyxSMdweIkkcnrivjn4zX+fFEtjE7PDagMuTnk9R+FVFXZE5l3wVrcqPYQxF lKuNzKcHHpX218MNQEmgkmVjyOrH0r4K8CyNaz7ySyg8k9q+0fgxqUX/AAioaSVG3bWBbk4I p/CZ/EfYi2CJ4QaeABRcS+bLG44R+p2jtzXA+IrJtXZbhEV43wpQrjYfUfT1r1C4tJ1aW1hg FxbiPekbtgMx+9/9auLnmtro/ZJAbedDtWKQ4xjjGe/1okYQ3M3SbG0i0SW21DbcmLMBM3zs UPABJ64rznxH4Z/tzT9X8CrcZurVjcaZcMcMoU5xu68gV3epaTcT3hW1dg0YzLEvCuR7965r xTcxXkialAgh1O2UQS+uAMHnvyMVBvE4zXNXXWNJ8O3EqC0v9KiWC5K8cAgdfY1W8Z6DeLrw cTxyQX6GW2vzz0HRm7nHFZ+qajb3eoTwzQJHHdQgMgPylvT257Vo6DZ3Ws+D7nRLiX5Yifs7 SNuMZHXBPT8KCzzjVfEklpomr6fJkT3MYdJU42jd82D2zWl4ckbxXLLBbkSaPBGhktwMKJAO o7Dmue1XQbiPU0sZiTEsbiSU/wB08j8M1oeCvE1r4O8I3FnLG0V3cSYeRefl9/b2oAy/Gmqr Ya9J9pheC2ZWiJz5iqegGe1c74ZvrTTp7y0upW2qoaKUJ9wnqoPaux1fw3J4g8P3clrOHtLl i7YOWDDndjtmuC07T7sNPaTu5DDeHJPJFA0rnuHgtLjULMPFOqwlQCh/jOOvtXrFs76J8O3t EJ8xZlnXnlWPYGvA/AfiRtMFrBIvyS4JJr6C0mJtd0t7YLiIgFW9fSmlcUo2Rf8AAviJ9eln s3XMvPB5254wPxryj4x/BG2fS9XbVonnmt7hXlTbglByDn6dTXtmjeAv+Eeis9UF6dNv/KLp Js3xzljtCuPXPQnvWto73vj7xB4y8L+KBbrPb26vaO6gySKyfOhY8sVPH4VXwmKlqflb4lvr /wAF3cfiDTr67ivFuJbexmb508lf4QT6DFc9d+NpNeuLmeb/AI/7l1XeBtB55OO2a7D49+Eb rwdqn9gxrM1lFqFw8ULsSqEnkKOgz7VxOpeG10a/DROksckhSNTyV54/GqTuWndnf6UkNvZL q0ciMbJjBdQHuSeHHtW94i+I9sfCkVjZPDJcBgZJUABb15rhpbeDS/D94k3mLOtsxlyflLE/ IT6nHQ15hZGd540SR1DNhgpI4p8tyufkPpTwHr39p2M1uFG7bv4FYmv6c+p3LRGEzOrE5Aye tef6VreqeF7iGSwlZz5jKI9xPmID3r2v4e6hLqaDWX00SxXTDcYnyYgOpCms2rGqnc3fhz4V QaRZw36LBcXbObMyIACF/h3VtGwtEs3lntxHfNcCIxYzhM4J/PvXUfFTw0LjwDpN/ol881pa wL8mdkkc7Yz06Gq3hiNdRs42vbTy7jSJPIuHYbzIrDKs3r1B5qSW7nP/ABKs5/A3gm81S2O6 BWkjePZgxnbwcV5p8PhrXibSY9QvpJY3tlkuhP5QOIwMrkflXsPxk8a2GrfCbVrOG2lv7mQg w3KvtPTGM98YryX4ca5qFt4Hlvo9Olu1jhkjvIjKcmEtgY9eeaYkrnYfD3U9b8YWlhdatLBb zanbzTRGFQpyiIUJHQHn8M1v+Ffs3iXwZp8GpRp/bdzDPHLO4AHmZwCR/EwKnmuQl861h0e3 WRQmnWf2pZoflLMygeWcdunHtVbwSry27y6heSbrEO8R3nIO8sMenBpFchJ+01r9tq3gXwis Vwbme4dPt+2P+OMADP1xXqPwT+ICHw/aLpEP2iZYHiuLWX5VdMV5P4ru7LUYDarFyWMh4+6a r6TqFxommBbOURq3ynBwxFMOQf8AEXxHqugeJtKGnNssS7Nc2w+ZYwTnyz2IXp+FcT8RvBml +Ibux1K0f/TL52a5SMYCDOQcV02oyy3SsN7gN1XJxVbSrTypi7AFumT1xTTsNR7nBWXgO90e OdRMWSRd6gJkgntXtPwO0/UtQ8OTpHNuEDrEwY8qwHI9qiguY4Yt3JmH3Q33ar6H4oHhRr5L SX7M11cNczKOMyN94j2zmhu4pJI/Q3wv41XXpZ7PUVWG/jcogAxlQcAisb4h6BLqhgkjdlkj d1DA8kA8VymuX66d4nWa3G2eJ/3cqceYue57iuw1HVpdQsbW8RwUEZMgQ988kUN3ORRsRfDR buS5k0TU0Mgnjby5zycdgTXlXxG0+68Ma/d6TGgLqNxO/BKk96910+4t9L1vS75SRbTAqrDo D7+9cV8a/h5Lq2vSavaqLi7mRDiMdh61JrE+b7rwvfnVGuHi8y3MuZUHIj4zmuu8F2kl9pU0 9pKlwLc8xocMB3yO5FdY+jzOLnSQhs728gMqTYwpdTjZj6VR8TeDH8PeBNYkt7a40q9RUmub n7SEPl4yfJA6A00rjbSPN/iGiRahEsbokc0SsP3gDFcZIOK8r1uWM3Oqx2UwlkCKw2SZDbvu hR3bnmoNW0Bdd0vxj468Oa3JM2jrDMunzs2Wy2JFAHHrnHWtLS/D+lajpnh7xNptqlnbpqV2 Lty+5YGkXKn2+bODVcpdtLlTwx8TrX4axR2niK3mtrkHZcKrFsZPyj8B1qz4h8XaJqfihZtJ vY5dMaPzvNXjkjkfnXA/Hi3h1DRtL1SGTN7JLKbgpwz/ACjBz3xXH+E9JGoeEdOgt42W8nv7 jfKh52JEDjHcZ5xSasrgnZnvfhDXbO91NoxPHKtuuFDjA3+lfUPwX1e4njsIbq2VpXlEXlFv lb5exr5D8EeHdJ1X+z2hvCZZZWSQCPC5K8ceoIr3P4eeNJ4fD+nSSGCKSCd1ZXfay7Gxux68 daE7BOV0faemabNpFv5lyqXmlXuy3u9PueJLfAyrJJ6Z5/Wvnz4g+K7H4cePbi41a8yHlEVn cCTexD/wsep68+9bvxB+L2qSeFUtNFDrpupQL5l3uDbHVydyj+Ekd+uK+R/i1eNrU+mvJcyX TLMJnVn3FX/xFDdzOlHVtlP9pTw7qOt6za63byQvbrIQxI3HPQvjsTXgNx4Q1rVvFIhswbhA 3mK5GACDz+NfSOo65Zf2W0VwrTSyDcpbnBPc571yZ1Fdy21igSY8tIowcnrzQnY6HHscT4w8 I6rP4TLSPEl7dsPPXsqpwB+leW6Zpd5pN63n2Xm7OXULnANe5a7HcyukUpPl9MZ4P4Vn22ms +oyO4+WRNpP9761XMZSpOR5z4O06fUta1AxRyPa2sDsQP4N7fz5r2fw1LP4CstPSbTzFEyIY Z9ucIshz+YxmqXhfTY/Cn9q/Z0Ba/wABiw984+ldHdalNqka288jMsYKBSxIA74HYVLdylCy Ow1DWG+z31vNqIutOvfKmS3RdpjcrknNcz4W8c33h5blDdi9jvWZbgzJyUXiPDdSQABn2qkZ HjtHiLNIM8Mxzis2KApFhT93ofSpHyF/Wbj+09LWFgBbAZSNegFY2k3MmkWjWdvujiI5CnHy +lWJppGQKucgYJHeoHyq+jYwaClGxI10fIfDHa3JGetVoJ/LhcJ8oPULxmopZQq4HAHamL90 Y6GgslgkNxMxLEsTySeTVuSBIlUsqnHTI6VWsFAuRgAc112uaZZxeB7C/gcT39zqy2TQL95I jGCX/A0AcnPMpGcDmn6WI57gRKSHb5fm6ZPNP1m0i0TUpYJcyKiYdW+8GHXArOVZ7h7K5s7d 1tVUhmZ8OxYZBPuB+VAFzX9Xt5NS/s/SpmuGULHPhMBJRwwB+uao6pbLbXJiunSJkyoDNk57 /rUfhBG0bXbtrt2ksop/PVmbcZC3IVj3/GsrWdM/4SbUJ72WTZJLI8xRT90OdwH60EtXPv7W IZP7Jtrto0kRSIvkGWVenWrNxqyaVZWiQuqwMigg+mOhqXRdLn0uDTLW4WRrOVyZmck8HpWD 8RvA+pw6wv8AZ3mSWM6ghWJO36elNK5yJXPS9EvIdc0mG24RfN3IT0HqR6ZrsbCN7XVZJty3 tuI/uR7SQPSvG/DPhrV7fT4b7+3neys0Ctp6wjzUbHc9SKfo+ueIPCGsXWoWmiWniHT7r/W4 /dyIT1wB3HcihqwpLsz0MQaDrHiG0luY5PtIknWO0kiCbRj7wYelalx4aL6dN4f1iJbi2vZd ulyXSb1miIJVHJ6javANcBqk7/EbQLvUPC9/Lo/irRf3kViZmw4DYKDJ6lRzXU618dbXSLGx n1BDLPfJ9nj0eLpHcoPnnyOEPLcj1NCdjJxb6nwR8GtTf4PfH3xV4T8RWsTaHfXP2Ke3lYMq hnZwMHjoQPwFVL4WPgTw18U/B0MJ1FL25+06RIB8oQzKy5P95VBGevJ9aufG0aBe/Fq88QC3 +13ZkjnuJIiNskoXGa4XWPE13ePsBVIRkKEPOKrmOpRcVqcZ4zl1S68O7p7dLZbZpAFHLglR 0qH4c6hqPhaTTJXt48oZZYdyhiQww2R7itm7D3cpDMX3fe3HOfrTo4lguEZADIoxnuPWk3cC 9o2r6rpzM1rcSW4eQzx+XEF2OTn+Zrr4LYypp+pXlwZb50kadc8M5bLHHuc1ysUbSsWbkscn Pc1p2E3yFSchAVGew9KkuKuej3fjLzdMGmWWY7dVG5s4xx0Ht7Vx08wzkY65zVdZwFABwKr3 Fx15oNUkiW6upZ12gkjp1p2kp5c251CnpnHNU4ZGLfeOPrWmriO33MM8d6BkmuXUVw0UaquV AGcdaZbW8aBS+D9ax7m5zdIQeDV57j90eeaANWfyJUUALx7d6qS/IPlOD6iqdlK7Hpke9aBA bqBQAsdx5luVzzjmkXhQPahVC9AB9BS0AREYJrPumO5uT1q1MxE2ASBUEgBdsjPJoApSgbBx 2oX7o+lTTKMDgUigbRwOlACwShW44I712fgZdMn1MRanP9nj8iaWIjq0uBtya4wKB2FWrZgh DkDA6j1oAv8Aiy0vodQ1Hz4FjuGbJZxksCeoPvWHHmNrFVJEUbtvQdD6ZFemzuvj7RpJyBHd 6XYRrLOw+VkDYXJ7nAFebw2hMkyglymC6d1z0NAFPVN0aTLGirGBkrjuOhFc5LcTaTb28ke6 RrkGRmY5PU8E+2a6lInu9fXTnBllCM7Y5wPf2qnq1gJRbogRljXblTwT3oA/Ro+JlaxtbO8i ieSMKCyqM8DFdaJrXVIYLmNgyxoFKvyQcc4rwXVdf+yIZAzLcLKeGP8ADmvTPAst1rOipcQi IocMW3+tUnY4JprY7C08F6VftJqiXEtrLEM3HlEr5ydCpA64969C8H+B/DNlYRTTXF35Nuu+ 3jbDHawzjJrzqbUp9IYR2yrPdPGN8XXch6/Wus8KyLe6d5EbqDH+8McnLEHkA1pFo55ORduP hxoEOoPcabp6JPOxZyFUO2e5I7186/tMeFtN8FW95caXAtrtt5prk7+UfbjI9CTX03oVoYGu 5p5vsSCT7xbtj0r4u/allkg1DV86kmpW1/H5QWNsgZOcEUptdCqV2z4+v7xprhpG+VpDuYe9 UURBOMKAOwAq/fQAz5689T3qu6BZV4ArI7m7oJbcD5gAD6im2iL5pJAJz1Iqw3mSjao6UsNu VaTsQv60CJ2aOFlAbLtzir1oi+Wx2jPfisiFFhhMj/PMeV3cmrtlK7REsSCeSM0Fw3L0kiqg 4GcVn3DE5OaseWzAEkmkNvnqM0GpBZyPvxjIrQlYmMAk4x0qtCNj4HGPSpGYknJNACRWwd8l QcdMirz2w8sfKOR6VFb1JK7eYBuOPTNAEkahFAAxgdqmHIFQRxsznk9aeSQcZPFABMSBwcUi sdo5PSg89eaKAIp/Xv61GACMnrUk/Sq7Eh1GTQAsyjHQVDJwoxxU8yqR941WMbHuSO3NACr9 0fSplkAXHGKhAwMelRzEgcHFBLdjoLHxc+i+H9V01IwyaiEDccAIc1zOi61LpWoanfyJ57Xi mIxvyEHbAPTHalmuPMRVHUDGfwqtjr6nr70ApXJ9Akl0nVDqQlaa5ZGQs7E70PGCe9WbTSob GBEQb8gMdwyc96ZYopCrgbQOBjgVu22hXd/H5kEMjpnlk7nrQUfS3xF0uLWdO+16ayQtaytB KFnyXGeCPXitSx0/xB4S+FkWsafcol1c3EeLBuS0AwN/+znqa8B8CzrfWPheW/nubS10m/mt tWlt5WLGIDEJbnqOB7V9h3WnQeI/CjCyEcrW8PlGW3YAFeuGHTPqKDlZ5xP4m1Ia2LqLXrnT 4UjS3KbNzI4HzbX67c8fSvV/C3jR7rSEu5zHBq1opWeSN9vnBeMke+M189avdWcGp3Fut39o jkngiZNu7ySy4dW9hkHHrzWO/iO+0vXb2zvLpZ7CKIKiZwTn1qk7CUVM9+8SfHuTVNA1eW2k EfkRrgZwzHHJ+tfF/izxq+q6nd7ppGFw7SKrMTg5rd8VeL7fT7WfS9PIYsSC6HoPQH0rx+/M 32ndySCcNnkUN3K5OQ0Z7hJ1BUAH2qsVGeRk+tZr3vlsIixWQHIAPUVZhvgx5qRluJ2DHDEc +tKXbcxycnrzVSaQ43KSM88VNbksq5OenWgB5GSD3HT2q1bn9aiwPQUplCOgHHHOKCk7F3JH ejJ9TUETlnPJxmp6DRSuSKoxnAzRgelR5PrUsh3xqF4OOooKAEjocfSlLEnJJJqqWZTjcePe rC8qPpQBdjJ2KcnOKXrVaFXJ+8cfWrckflWomkR/KBxuPygn60ANoqq115pwvy+wPSnhmwOT +dACvyxz61VuPk5U5Pp6UPPh2HPWnDBGcdeaAIgSygt1pckd6D1NFABVWcmMkkkj0NWvMA4x VOVt7NnkZ6GgzmQZycjvzT4kdm+7kUsSjcRgYrSs7YyFEHVm4oFDcm0nT2mcfMsf+9Xs3hjT roeFrEWe1GEkgkKjG4/Lg14P8Sb+XwzregWqkw2U9uJHkXgvLvxsJ+navWvh9qklzouyfUns o42xEplI3Ljr1/D8KDUyNNluPBPjnxB4W1RRff2ncXnniBP3DkOSrr6fhXosvxH1XwyI7F5k 0fT79VYwwttWSYDDLkdc814xrnxMPjbx1b3ttALK3sAQHAw0u5f/AEH2rnNS1bVdfktI9Sum mt7c74izE7W/vDPQn1oMYq57FF4xsdC8UajdSBEgu545vJGNhIUDGOh6AfgK83+JXiu48QeM rq/t7z7OtzEsZtkGFQDvgcZPrXP61frGqJJI1zdsQtnFnJx3ZqjYxvdW4QO8uCjzOck49/Sg 1SSL5tJmsBPHIEkjUEt03CszTPEKyyyS/Z45nDFGWRQyjHcA1ba5cabKh+cKNuTzkVykSG3u 4xBIVyd0kWex9qCJl/WNNe81mTU1V/LCrGIIeAD64FVtRlNnePbHKXEYVyv+yeldrpssemQq +N0rKBtbnI7E1x3jZRqHiGK8t18qV4xFKRxwOAaDMmjnO4qxJxxzV63YnHPFY1uGXAY7mHU+ prYtei/SgC1k+pp4AIBIyaABgcUtAEsH3qlJOTzTEGFGOOKWguG5ZhAOMjNOPBOOKZAzDHyi rBxKMAAHvgUGpXjh3OSfWpbx1iEYAA4HQVseH9IfVtTgs8qhkbaHI4Hy55rlPEN+E1Sa2jDA QyNGz9nwcZHsaANqxmUkZANb/wAQtVXXPhtpGjWcaRXaTl5p0ADbB0GetcVYXPIwxx7mtkSG WIKDx1x70AZunQbLYKR8xAxnqKl1JLjR5re3uFMU01st1Gsn8cbNgEfWtBbfAHHPrWlGo1rW dLn1MLqP2WEQIZhuZIl+7GCf4Rxx0oA5F5PNdXxjd82PrVjzQvGOlX/Hnha48NSwtp5+07YT JcRN/wAs1Y8YPsOKyXnisbZ7+dlMSLhR1Vn9PegC9FbyXEZfZtUdx3qo0wViPQ4qnoPiG+1K 5WZ0CIeRAvCY9COldbfaRb3+iz3sMXlXakyOiDC474Hpmgluxy7TDJppOTmqD3YtwgkPzkDA PepIbnccnv2oM27loRnqDjNaGls8UoLMTg5GT0qhE5Ynk4q3CSG6mgcNyj46um1T7LbXQEsM UnmITyQc5qEahJdRxoZHiSJdiIGIAH0rVu7WK6hKyAbv4WI5FZiaYyZBJf3POaDUh8OBbe+a 4uEZX8vIP95gxAqTTma80m3uroeVeOzO0B7A84x7VYEoinjWXORgqrUskLLJG0mZ7iaWTaOm 1STgZoMobmZHaC41uDUYRiZIwgVugGO1aC7pdjxnpI8ZVeACpwaZdyLoklnGy/6ROdiqedw9 vpUsMU0XiiGyjUeS0Ky5QYUsRl2+pOeaDUktrYT2U0hV8ckgdK5VLf7R40mljUpBHaxqd3TI A5roLq7ubPXTHFI/2HeSFDEKwzxxRcLG19cXRVYYXGXQLwccY9qCWrj4b7czSkCQJ+7DHnpx UltoQ8S38Sl1gGwrk8bj1GfWsXTpvsatbNkxPKWUsc4UniumgCxQxTDmOSRljI6gjjNBHIcQ Z5bPxJcafNGEWA5icjiUfxH3wa3NPyUO7BNT6/awS2U1+0Xm30Ns0UCgZB3Nkmo9AsZ760i8 tgoMe4u3sOaA5CfzQOKkiO4nvVHTXF6zFGztOCT0NXohhyDjr2oDkLFMdZPMXA4NWYbeRznb kGpQnlz7JPv7dwHtQUo2CIkRHsaIZgG56+tNmvVdMBQrd8DFQwnLUFmzbapJbKWiJR1OQynB 9M5rG1O1N20cvlqPKHTHUHpVkS4GKk3Fh16gUAY8LeW5VlAYcHjvWvascAg44q1DY2D2N7JI Cb2Qr5PoP7xNIlnGtncSQuXk3KsSk9V7mgCe2CzNt/eE+xrqfDum2i30P28sYpIXYbf+WeOM n2wAay9VnXw7p6lbQTrqMP7icNgwkffb8+K2fCqR32mavL9oU3dxp81ntc5w7RBQR+IoA8u1 PxvfeNNdmjD+VaRqbZmQ8TqOM59DjNR65okt94bt7Czi/wBTJwgHRR0/SsPwlY3mghtK1C3e C/hQsEPRkU7d30r1vwLCn9tqbkIbOONpJC6gAgdFzQBxPhrRZolaMqFnz9w9WHrXoy6lp2ge Cb8XG2XVJpEtY4cA7Y2XJb6jpXP+INci1bUpNQtLeOwnUFIFiUKFT+HOO+K5WzE4TULq9uPO uQWZmkbcD/u5oM5nK+I2ZPEEEakmP7Nnr0Oeta9uo47+9YwZr65S5KHyiu1S3Xb6VvWqrGoQ gEkcE0GZZg61ftIiz+tVYFAOCK3tHs4ZFlmmlCpGuQg6saC4blTxDb/2NJYRXPySXsH2m34y rqOCM1VMgBxtxjt6V1GstpviTw3AbzeDYIotlH+sUvyy56hc9q53VdHlhWBYc7gDvPrQamDM ZTqkVzMA4J27TyPrXRXfk3SiAEi4VMIw4680UUGUNzF1CKPVvsTXeVk0o7kePg89QD6VZsZs XpnQsqDKRHPzKvYe3FFFBqSS+St6iOoZiyoi4+UDb1xWVqizLplzpEWGnnIeSY9VXqcH370U UALY2ELtBFtDR7QAWGSBitu6jWyhYpzsCpGh6L6kehNFFAFbXybTTlih4kyo442g9cVNHAke mvbx/uQVKKY+Mdu1FFAFHwlozvefYDtEURwxHUqK69tH0+xkuoljLtKA1uXGdoHXNFFAEVkE tpb6VlDK4BijIyEB9B2rB1q4Z9YiuCNht1CFF6OD6+tFFAFLToXvL28DMRHEWKHPXmrejyxX BYOG3A8+1FFAGnr1stotra26g3EqLMXI6KRnFZ8kz2rA43Iwxz2oooAmS4ygVSQcYJHetGyi MMMU0mFjU8beuKKKAK+sSfa7lGmZnh5ighJ+VUJzjHTnqfetzwykGnSqLneg8zcWU5z6UUUA UNV1VvEfju5nis4mt4T9kiaTBkdAcEZPIHHSp/Gavp19NZ2zslrGiFI2YnGex9cUUUAYFw4s rGSdwGVyUxjiuduPMeE54iXgLnjH0oooM5laAhlA/g6gdq1rZQQpIGQOtFFBmWgPLYse9Swu S2QSPSiiguG5pW7EuWydxABOeTW7eWsUUNqfMZy8Qc7ucEgE0UUGp//Z --------------060601070103060004020105-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 1 13:47:05 2004 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) id NAA19685; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 13:43:50 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 13:43:50 -0800 Message-ID: <002701c3ffd6$3859cf80$8837fea9 cpq> From: "Jones Beene" To: References: <6.0.1.1.2.20040301151321.01cb6210 pop.mindspring.com> Subject: Re: Message sent to Mark Goldes about magic magnet motor Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 13:43:21 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id NAA19625 Resent-Message-ID: <"Qqrlw1.0.Xp4.LwwG01" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53335 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Here is the site again: http://www.magnethealer.com/index.html It has all the ear-markings of a scam, but let's reserve judgement to see if Mark's crew sees any hope of success. I am convinced that a self-spinner is possible, but not a device that will produce substanital OU to power an external load. My reasoning for this is based on spin-spin interactions (and not very well thought-out so far). If the company in question has anything of value, it was obviously not created by an electrical engineer, nor even a well-educated inventor as they confuse 'power' with 'potential' on several occasions... but the crucial point here - as common sense dictates (and someone has already suggested) is that if it was a real thing, or even a minimally sophisticated scam, they would at least show a jpeg of the model they are trying to unload on the ever-present optimists of the world. This looks like the no-frills grift deluxe: nothing but hot air and cyberspace as overhead ! As to the motivation, the model for all of this is, of course, the inimitable Joe Newman who has made a small fortune sellling overpriced self-published books, despite his so-called invention being litttle more than... well, let's don't go there, as we don't want to encourage anyone from that camp to get their dander up as has happened periodically in past years. Jones From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 1 13:54:45 2004 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) id NAA27543; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 13:53:28 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 13:53:28 -0800 X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 12:58:37 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: RE: NASA's Silence Resent-Message-ID: <"prcjW3.0.Jk6.N3xG01" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53336 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 2:49 AM 3/2/4, explorecraft wrote: >I know I promised, > but 1M131296201EFF0500P2933M2M1.jpg > has crystals, > cubic facets if my eyes aren't shot. Hey ... who can resist? Being able to witness this is one of the great experiences of many centuries of lifetimes. It seems almost more the stuff of science fiction than the reality it is. > > Meaning salt, grown by dessication? in all probablility. > Out of solution, not necessarily not exclusively > but most likely some solution of water-borne salts. > Look carfully and you will see the growth steps. > > Green/blue features probably have some amounts of > ferrous and cupric chlorides, both hydrous mineral. > >And by the way Horace, > the official version is spherules form like raindrops > growing out of the soil, That was Gilbert Levine's opinion I think, who is somewhat of a NASA outcast. Hopefully, though, the folks at NASA have had the common sense to have biologists, especially lichen experts and microbiologists, look at the data. > your version is they grow like grapes. Yep, some at least are clearly little fruiting bodies, and when trapped for eons in accumulating layers of stuff, they leave accreted and fossilized images of themselves. It appears that in at least some of the white stuff Opportuinty is grinding though, they are merely frozen. Many of the spheres clearly have an ostiole, and there is even evidence for a perithecium in an ostiole. However, I wonder if a major function of some or all of the fruiting bodies is to store water. Much more of the volume of the bodies appears to be water/gell than for terrestrial varieties. BTW, it is interesting that when the desert varish is brushed off from basalt rocks the basalt underneath is black. This means of course that the desert varnish is lighter, that the light side of such black basalt rocks is where the bacteria have grown. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 1 13:55:41 2004 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) id NAA27616; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 13:53:31 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 13:53:31 -0800 X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 12:58:41 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Biospherix Resent-Message-ID: <"1egSC2.0.Rl6.R3xG01" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53337 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: My info on Levine's company was way out of date and a bit wrong (not surprising after 20 years!) See: >http://www.tagatose.com/< Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 1 14:07:28 2004 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) id OAA02885; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 14:03:08 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 14:03:08 -0800 Message-ID: <4043B363.5080807 pobox.com> Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 17:04:19 -0500 From: "Stephen A. Lawrence" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Standing Water References: <4043AAA5.1040600 rtpatlanta.com> In-Reply-To: <4043AAA5.1040600 rtpatlanta.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"4Kg0S2.0.zi.RCxG01" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53338 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Terry Blanton wrote: > Call me crazy, but this sure looks like standing water around this rock: > > >http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/p/036/1P131377170EFF0500P2532R1M1.JPG< > > Notice some of the spherules seem to be submerged. Impressive. Sadly short on specular reflections, unfortunately. Pebble shadows falling on the surface, plus lack of reflections, make it look like the stuff -- water, mud, dust, whatever -- is opaque with a non-shiny surface. The angle looks pretty steep, though, which tends to reduce visible reflections. A shallower view might show some, if it's really water (or mud). From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 1 14:14:32 2004 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) id OAA09632; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 14:12:39 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 14:12:39 -0800 Message-ID: <4043B5A0.5080306 pobox.com> Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 17:13:52 -0500 From: "Stephen A. Lawrence" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Biospherix References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"GGINo.0.SM2.MLxG01" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53339 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Horace Heffner wrote: > My info on Levine's company was way out of date and a bit wrong (not > surprising after 20 years!) See: > > > >>http://www.tagatose.com/< > Thanks. Sounds a little like xylitol, but with fewer calories. The structural formula http://food.oregonstate.edu/sugar/tagatose.html doesn't look like what I think of as a sugar, but it's been an awfully long time since I took a chemistry course. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 1 15:55:28 2004 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) id PAA13073; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 15:51:49 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 15:51:49 -0800 Message-ID: <004801c3ffe8$271e7970$6401a8c0 Craig> From: "SnowDog" To: Subject: Desert Varnish? Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 17:51:14 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Resent-Message-ID: <"UAJqP3.0.9C3.KoyG01" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53340 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: I think Horace mentioned this, but take a look at this picture: http://www.golddirectory.com/images/mars7.htm Even though I can't calibrate the color, for reasons outlined earlier, I think it's fair to say that the rock is red, while that which covers it is not. Desert Varnish? Craig Haynie From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 1 18:30:07 2004 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) id SAA18943; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 18:25:10 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 18:25:10 -0800 Message-ID: <4043F0CA.6050403 rtpatlanta.com> Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 21:26:18 -0500 From: Terry Blanton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Desert Varnish? References: <004801c3ffe8$271e7970$6401a8c0 Craig> In-Reply-To: <004801c3ffe8$271e7970$6401a8c0 Craig> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"P6fRK.0.xd4.52_G01" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53341 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: I keep getting "connection refused" msgs. SnowDog wrote: >I think Horace mentioned this, but take a look at this picture: > >http://www.golddirectory.com/images/mars7.htm > >Even though I can't calibrate the color, for reasons outlined earlier, I >think it's fair to say that the rock is red, while that which covers it is >not. > >Desert Varnish? > >Craig Haynie > > > > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 1 18:56:29 2004 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx2.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id SAA21723; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 18:52:16 -0800 (PST) Resent-Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 18:52:16 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <006901c40001$54ac1eb0$6401a8c0 Craig> From: "SnowDog" To: References: <004801c3ffe8$271e7970$6401a8c0 Craig> <4043F0CA.6050403@rtpatlanta.com> Subject: Re: Desert Varnish? Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 20:51:28 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Resent-Message-ID: <"MjzQI1.0.NJ5.UR_G01" mx2> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53343 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: > >Even though I can't calibrate the color, for reasons outlined earlier, I > >think it's fair to say that the rock is red, while that which covers it is > >not. > > > >Desert Varnish? I've put the image here, as well: http://home.houston.rr.com/haynie/mars.htm Craig Haynie From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 1 18:56:41 2004 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx2.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id SAA19628; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 18:42:36 -0800 (PST) Resent-Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 18:42:36 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4043F4C9.90301 rtpatlanta.com> Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 21:43:21 -0500 From: Terry Blanton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Reflections in Water Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"biaoF1.0.do4.PI_G01" mx2> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53342 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: There do seem to be reflections in: >http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/p/036/1P131377170EFF0500P2532R1M1.JPG< two small bright spots half way across the x-axis and 10% up in the y . If you alt+tab this image with: >http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/p/036/1P131377137EFF0500P2532L7M1.JPG< there are two other reflections in the former but not in the latter - probably due to the angle. "Place your bets!" From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 1 19:14:11 2004 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx2.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id TAA25102; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 19:06:34 -0800 (PST) Resent-Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 19:06:34 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <004d01c40000$22f26f10$6401a8c0 Craig> From: "SnowDog" To: References: <004801c3ffe8$271e7970$6401a8c0 Craig> <4043F0CA.6050403@rtpatlanta.com> Subject: Re: Desert Varnish? Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 20:42:55 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Resent-Message-ID: <"oIs8F2.0.586.pe_G01" mx2> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53344 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: > >http://www.golddirectory.com/images/mars7.htm > I keep getting "connection refused" msgs. The past few days, my website has been going up and down continuously. It's a shame. It's been so strong the past 5 years, but now it's unreliable. It'll be up soon -- maybe by morning. I'm trying to find another ISP at the moment. Craig Haynie From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 1 20:07:07 2004 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) id UAA10018; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 20:03:16 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 20:03:16 -0800 Message-ID: <4043FBB0.4080102 rtpatlanta.com> Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 22:12:48 -0500 From: Terry Blanton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Desert Varnish? References: <004801c3ffe8$271e7970$6401a8c0 Craig> <4043F0CA.6050403@rtpatlanta.com> <006901c40001$54ac1eb0$6401a8c0@Craig> In-Reply-To: <006901c40001$54ac1eb0$6401a8c0 Craig> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"956oa1.0.QS2.4U0H01" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53345 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: SnowDog wrote: >I've put the image here, as well: > >http://home.houston.rr.com/haynie/mars.htm > Absolutely beautiful! I made it my wallpaper. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 1 21:12:50 2004 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) id VAA17870; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 21:11:31 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 21:11:31 -0800 X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 20:16:39 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: Desert Varnish? Resent-Message-ID: <"_jz-k3.0.AN4.3U1H01" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53346 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 10:12 PM 3/1/4, Terry Blanton wrote: >SnowDog wrote: > >>I've put the image here, as well: >> >>http://home.houston.rr.com/haynie/mars.htm >> > >Absolutely beautiful! Amen to that! I don't think the red powder is desert varnish though. I think that red powder might be what you get when you grind up frozen Mars lichen. It's mostly water, but there is a fibrous matrix that appears to show up when the stuff is ground. Interesting that the balls are blue in cross-section. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 2 03:35:41 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i22BZXKq018026; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 03:35:34 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i22BZVbr018010; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 03:35:31 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 03:35:31 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <003d01c40042$089f0fa0$2d80b341 computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: Subject: RE: NASA's Silence Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 04:35:04 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-ELNK-Trace: 0b1c9d71006e06a171639b933de7ae6f7e972de0d01da940b9403d8341f739c8f78585cd41b56d55350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53347 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Hi Keith, you wrote. > > BTW a new study proves H2O2 present on mars. I'll bet the upcoming press > will be about the discovery of martian free energy Sparberinos! Naw, Keith, that (solar) free energy generator is still bathing the Earth with about 12,000 Quads/day and Mars with about 6,000 Quads/day with free energy. The total daily world production and use of most of this free energy is about One Quad/day. At the present rate of use and pollution, our grandkids will probably end up following livestock around the meadow with a "pooper scooper" in order to fuel their biomass converter. The CF/OU crowd hasn't produced enough net free energy in the last 15 years to rival the free energy Btu output from a "cow pie". Lots of BullShit though. :-) Regards, Frederick > K. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 2 03:59:49 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i22BxiKq022326; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 03:59:45 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i22Bxh65022306; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 03:59:43 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 03:59:43 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <004f01c4004d$dafa3910$6401a8c0 Craig> From: "SnowDog" To: References: Subject: Re: Desert Varnish? Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 05:59:15 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53348 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: > >>http://home.houston.rr.com/haynie/mars.htm > > Amen to that! I don't think the red powder is desert varnish though. ... No, the red powder proves that the rock is red. What's that darker stuff on top of the rock? Craig From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 2 06:25:51 2004 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) id GAA06218; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 06:23:31 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 06:23:31 -0800 X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 05:28:42 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: Desert Varnish? Resent-Message-ID: <"vutIT.0.6X1.ZZ9H01" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53349 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 5:59 AM 3/2/4, SnowDog wrote: >> >>http://home.houston.rr.com/haynie/mars.htm >> >> Amen to that! I don't think the red powder is desert varnish though. ... > >No, the red powder proves that the rock is red. What's that darker stuff on >top of the rock? > >Craig If the rock were red then the flat ground surface would be red. The ground surface is not red. It is white. I think the white stuff is mostly frozen water, a kind of fibrous gel. The red comes from the fibrous material, and must be the natural (unfrozen, air exposed) color of the lichen. Lichen is basically just mold fibers mixed with cyano bacteria or algae. From the looks of the red powder, I'd hypothesise (guess) its color came from live cyano bacteria. >From previous photos, I just don't think the white stuff is rock. It is at least in part flexible and fibrous. I think the dark stuff on top of the underlying frozen white stuff is merely dirt - probably just dirt consisting mostly of weathered basalt rock. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 2 06:29:23 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i22ESsKq001848; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 06:28:59 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i22ESjgh001799; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 06:28:45 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 06:28:45 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <005d01c40053$8bf9b560$2d80b341 computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: Subject: Re: Solar-Photovoltaic Power Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 06:40:24 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-ELNK-Trace: 0b1c9d71006e06a171639b933de7ae6f7e972de0d01da94019f270a1a5a0e514614d969518d2f1fe350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53351 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: http://www.californiasolarcenter.org/solareclips/solareclips052003.html "On the horizon: a virtually perfect solar cell [Lawrence Berkeley Labs] - An unexpected discovery at the Dept of Energy's Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL) may push the implementation of PV's sooner than later. A serendipitous discovery by the lab about the electronic properties of Indium Nitride may eventually yield high efficiency solar PV's, by making use of the entire spectrum of the suns radiation. While research the properties of the LED's (light emitting diodes) researchers found that band-gap energy of Indium Nitride is 0.7 electron volts, much lower than the 2.0 electron volts previously expected. The Band-gap energy is the amount of energy needed to free an electron from its atom; a solar cell material can only capture sunlight at energies equal to or greater than its band-gap energy. The lower band-gap energy of Indium Nitride means that it can capture sunlight at much lower energies than expected, so the material is able to capture low-frequency, red or infrared light, in other words a broader spectrum of radiant energy. This discovery may lead to 2 layer PV's that can be 50% efficient in converting sunlight-to-electricity. (source: BIPERUSA May 2003 newsletter)." From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 2 06:30:23 2004 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) id GAA07960; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 06:27:07 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 06:27:07 -0800 X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 05:32:18 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: Desert Varnish? Resent-Message-ID: <"_BSVd2.0.Ky1.wc9H01" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53350 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 5:59 AM 3/2/4, SnowDog wrote: >> >>http://home.houston.rr.com/haynie/mars.htm >> >> Amen to that! I don't think the red powder is desert varnish though. ... > >No, the red powder proves that the rock is red. What's that darker stuff on >top of the rock? > >Craig If the rock were red then the flat ground surface would be red. The ground surface is not red. It is white. I think the white stuff is mostly frozen water, a kind of fibrous gel. The red comes from the fibrous material, and must be the natural (unfrozen, air exposed) color of the lichen. Lichen is basically just mold fibers mixed with cyano bacteria or algae. From the looks of the red powder, I'd hypothesise (guess) its color came from live cyano bacteria. >From previous photos, I just don't think the white stuff is rock. It is at least in part flexible and fibrous. I think the dark stuff on top of the underlying frozen white stuff is merely dirt - probably just dirt consisting mostly of weathered basalt rock. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 2 06:35:18 2004 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) id GAA09193; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 06:29:04 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 06:29:04 -0800 X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 05:34:12 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: Desert Varnish? Resent-Message-ID: <"ARGhx.0.XF2.me9H01" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53352 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 5:59 AM 3/2/4, SnowDog wrote: >> >>http://home.houston.rr.com/haynie/mars.htm >> >> Amen to that! I don't think the red powder is desert varnish though. ... > >No, the red powder proves that the rock is red. What's that darker stuff on >top of the rock? > >Craig If the rock were red then the flat ground surface would be red. The ground surface is not red. It is white. I think the white stuff is mostly frozen water, a kind of fibrous gel. The red comes from the fibrous material, and must be the natural (unfrozen, air exposed) color of the lichen. Lichen is basically just mold fibers mixed with cyano bacteria or algae. From the looks of the red powder, I'd hypothesise (guess) its color came from live cyano bacteria. From previous photos, I just don't think the white stuff is rock. It is at least in part flexible and fibrous. I think the dark stuff on top of the underlying frozen white stuff is merely dirt - probably just dirt consisting mostly of weathered basalt rock. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 2 06:48:12 2004 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) id GAA16889; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 06:47:20 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 06:47:20 -0800 From: Noreal016 aol.com Message-ID: <65.236f9d2e.2d75f850 aol.com> Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 09:46:40 EST Subject: Unsubscribe please To: vortex-l eskimo.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: 6.0 sub 10582 Resent-Message-ID: <"diNrL3.0.r74.uv9H01" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53353 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 2 07:30:15 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i22FU4Kq022555; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 07:30:05 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i22FTva0022519; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 07:29:57 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 07:29:57 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <001901c4006b$2bc8d820$8837fea9 cpq> From: "Jones Beene" To: "vortex" Subject: Martian metabolism Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 07:29:36 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0016_01C40028.1D40E2E0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53354 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0016_01C40028.1D40E2E0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Assuming that there is life on Mars, has anyone thought about the = metabolic pathways that would be available? The only authoritative reference that I can find states that the Martian = atmosphere consists of only 0.13% molecular oxygen. That is a big = problem for finding many kinds of oxidative metabolism. Of course, like = plants on earth CO2 could be photosynthesized, but that seems less = probable in the low solar flux. OTOH if all those beautiful blue rocks are really cuprates.... well, on = earth at least copper ore is rarely found without small percentages of = Pd and Ni...=20 Kervran's Proof of Biological Transmutation has been mentioned many = times here. Is there any obvious reason why some kind of LENR could not = have evolved (ala Kervan) in Martian life?=20 Jones ------=_NextPart_000_0016_01C40028.1D40E2E0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Assuming that there is life on Mars, has anyone thought about the = metabolic=20 pathways that would be available?
 
The only authoritative reference that I can find states that the = Martian=20 atmosphere consists of only 0.13% molecular oxygen. That is a big = problem for=20 finding many kinds of oxidative metabolism. Of course, like plants on = earth CO2=20 could be photosynthesized, but that seems less probable in the low = solar=20 flux.
 
OTOH if all those beautiful blue rocks are really cuprates.... = well, on=20 earth at least copper ore is rarely found without small percentages of = Pd and=20 Ni...
 
Kervran's Proof of Biological Transmutation has been mentioned many = times=20 here. Is there any obvious reason why some kind of LENR could not have = evolved=20 (ala Kervan) in Martian life?
 
Jones
------=_NextPart_000_0016_01C40028.1D40E2E0-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 2 07:58:38 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i22FwVqr001962; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 07:58:31 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i22FwS3p001944; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 07:58:28 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 07:58:28 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <00a401c40066$be4d07c0$2d80b341 computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: References: <001901c4006b$2bc8d820$8837fea9 cpq> Subject: Re: Martian metabolism Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 08:57:51 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00A1_01C40034.7188B2E0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-ELNK-Trace: 0b1c9d71006e06a171639b933de7ae6f7e972de0d01da9408586595f9d6b13b6bc609c709ca89f1c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53355 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_00A1_01C40034.7188B2E0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Jones Beene=20 To: vortex=20 Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2004 9:29 AM Subject: Martian metabolism Assuming that there is life on Mars, has anyone thought about the = metabolic pathways that would be available? Try this Jones. Then again there is CO and HO-OH, and H2, where the = "waste" product is H2O or CO2. Anerobic bacterial metabolism is poisoned by O2. :-) Frederick UMass Microbiologist Focuses on Iron-Eating Bacteria Findings have implications on beginning of life on Earth=20 AMHERST, Mass. -- University of Massachusetts microbiologist Derek = Lovley has made a discovery which opens a window to understanding how = life began on Earth. Lovley has determined that certain kinds of = microorganisms, which live several miles below ground, can use iron to = metabolize their food. The findings are reported in the Sept. 3 issue of = the journal Nature, and will be featured in an upcoming segment of the = television show "Discover Magazine," on the Discovery Channel.=20 Lovley, head of the microbiology department, studies unusual forms of = anaerobic microorganisms: in other words, bacteria that transform their = food into energy without using oxygen. "The research helps us to = understand life on Earth a little bit better," Lovley said, "but it also = has a practical side." His previous research has demonstrated that = microorganisms that can grow on iron can be used in treating = contaminated groundwater. The microorganisms use petroleum contaminants, = such as benzene, as food, and literally eat away at contamination. These = organisms can also remove toxic metals such as uranium and chromium from = contaminated waters. His most recent findings focus on = "hyperthermophiles": literally, those who love hot temperatures. = Hyperthermophiles are the organisms most closely related to early forms = of life, from which modern bacteria, plants, and animals have descended, = Lovley said.=20 It was previously believed that some of the first microorganisms used = sulfur to grow. But geologists noted that sulfur did not exist in the = proper form on early Earth. There was, however, abundant iron, so Lovley = set about determining whether iron could serve as an energy source for = these early bacteria. "You can't go back three billion years, but you = can study these hyperthermophiles, which are the modern organisms most = closely related to early life," said Lovley.=20 Studying seven species of hyperthermophiles, he determined that every = single one could use iron to metabolize its food. This lends weight to = the theory that iron was essential for the growth of early life on = Earth, according to Lovley. One type of hyperthermophile in particular, = thermotoga, used iron in a very central way, and sulfur in a very = trivial way, suggesting that iron was more central to the metabolism of = early organisms than sulfur. All of the hyperthermophiles converted iron = oxide to the magnetic mineral, magnetite, during their growth on iron. = This is significant because geologists have found large accumulations of = magnetite on early Earth. Furthermore, magnetite found deep below the = Earth's surface and in a Martian meteorite has been thought to provide = evidence for the possibility of life existing in these extreme = environments. The only authoritative reference that I can find states that the = Martian atmosphere consists of only 0.13% molecular oxygen. That is a = big problem for finding many kinds of oxidative metabolism. Of course, = like plants on earth CO2 could be photosynthesized, but that seems less = probable in the low solar flux. OTOH if all those beautiful blue rocks are really cuprates.... well, = on earth at least copper ore is rarely found without small percentages = of Pd and Ni...=20 Kervran's Proof of Biological Transmutation has been mentioned many = times here. Is there any obvious reason why some kind of LENR could not = have evolved (ala Kervan) in Martian life?=20 Jones ------=_NextPart_000_00A1_01C40034.7188B2E0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Jones Beene=20
To: vortex
Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2004 = 9:29=20 AM
Subject: Martian = metabolism

Assuming that there is life on Mars, has anyone thought about the = metabolic pathways that would be available?
 
Try this Jones.  Then again there is CO and = HO-OH, and=20 H2, where the "waste" product is H2O or CO2.
 
Anerobic bacterial metabolism is poisoned by O2.=20 :-)
 
Frederick
 

UMass Microbiologist Focuses on Iron-Eating = Bacteria

Findings have=20 implications on beginning of life on Earth=20

AMHERST, Mass. -- University of Massachusetts microbiologist Derek = Lovley=20 has made a discovery which opens a window to understanding how life = began on=20 Earth. Lovley has determined that certain kinds of microorganisms, = which live=20 several miles below ground, can use iron to metabolize their food. The = findings are reported in the Sept. 3 issue of the journal Nature, and = will be=20 featured in an upcoming segment of the television show "Discover = Magazine," on=20 the Discovery Channel.=20

Lovley, head of the microbiology department, studies unusual forms = of=20 anaerobic microorganisms: in other words, bacteria that transform = their food=20 into energy without using oxygen. "The research helps us to understand = life on=20 Earth a little bit better," Lovley said, "but it also has a practical = side."=20 His previous research has demonstrated that microorganisms that can = grow on=20 iron can be used in treating contaminated groundwater. The = microorganisms use=20 petroleum contaminants, such as benzene, as food, and literally eat = away at=20 contamination. These organisms can also remove toxic metals such as = uranium=20 and chromium from contaminated waters. His most recent findings focus = on=20 "hyperthermophiles": literally, those who love hot temperatures.=20 Hyperthermophiles are the organisms most closely related to early = forms of=20 life, from which modern bacteria, plants, and animals have descended, = Lovley=20 said.=20

It was previously believed that some of the first microorganisms = used=20 sulfur to grow. But geologists noted that sulfur did not exist in the = proper=20 form on early Earth. There was, however, abundant iron, so Lovley set = about=20 determining whether iron could serve as an energy source for these = early=20 bacteria. "You can't go back three billion years, but you can study = these=20 hyperthermophiles, which are the modern organisms most closely related = to=20 early life," said Lovley.=20

Studying seven species of hyperthermophiles, he determined that = every=20 single one could use iron to metabolize its food. This lends weight to = the=20 theory that iron was essential for the growth of early life on Earth,=20 according to Lovley. One type of hyperthermophile in particular, = thermotoga,=20 used iron in a very central way, and sulfur in a very trivial way, = suggesting=20 that iron was more central to the metabolism of early organisms than = sulfur.=20 All of the hyperthermophiles converted iron oxide to the magnetic = mineral,=20 magnetite, during their growth on iron. This is significant because = geologists=20 have found large accumulations of magnetite on early Earth. = Furthermore,=20 magnetite found deep below the Earth's surface and in a Martian = meteorite has=20 been thought to provide evidence for the possibility of life existing = in these=20 extreme environments.

The only authoritative reference that I can find states that the = Martian=20 atmosphere consists of only 0.13% molecular oxygen. That is a big = problem for=20 finding many kinds of oxidative metabolism. Of course, like plants on = earth=20 CO2 could be photosynthesized, but that seems less probable = in the low=20 solar flux.
 
OTOH if all those beautiful blue rocks are really cuprates.... = well, on=20 earth at least copper ore is rarely found without small percentages of = Pd and=20 Ni...
 
Kervran's Proof of Biological Transmutation has been mentioned = many times=20 here. Is there any obvious reason why some kind of LENR could not have = evolved=20 (ala Kervan) in Martian life?
 
Jones
------=_NextPart_000_00A1_01C40034.7188B2E0-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 2 08:54:07 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i22GruD9018990; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 08:54:02 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i22Gro8x018956; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 08:53:50 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 08:53:50 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <4044BC10.705 rtpatlanta.com> Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2004 11:53:36 -0500 From: "Terry Blanton" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Desert Varnish? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53356 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Horace Heffner wrote: >If the rock were red then the flat ground surface would be red. The ground >surface is not red. It is white. I think the white stuff is mostly frozen >water, a kind of fibrous gel. The red comes from the fibrous material, and >must be the natural (unfrozen, air exposed) color of the lichen. Lichen is >basically just mold fibers mixed with cyano bacteria or algae. From the >looks of the red powder, I'd hypothesise (guess) its color came from live >cyano bacteria. > There should be data on the RAT grinding effort that could support this. It would take a lot less energy to grind a given depth in the material you describe than the basalt at the Spirit site. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 2 09:00:42 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i22H03D9021860; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 09:00:08 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i22GxpQk021764; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 08:59:51 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 08:59:51 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <20040302165926.50937.qmail web11701.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 08:59:26 -0800 (PST) From: alexander hollins Subject: Re: Martian metabolism To: vortex-l eskimo.com In-Reply-To: <00a401c40066$be4d07c0$2d80b341 computer> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53357 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: si, carbonates freed from rock would be an oxygen pathway possibilitie. also, your looking at CURRENT life. for all we know, mars once had a thicker atmosphere with more o2. --- Frederick Sparber wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Jones Beene > To: vortex > Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2004 9:29 AM > Subject: Martian metabolism > > > Assuming that there is life on Mars, has anyone > thought about the metabolic pathways that would be > available? > > Try this Jones. Then again there is CO and HO-OH, > and H2, where the "waste" product is H2O or CO2. > > Anerobic bacterial metabolism is poisoned by O2. > :-) > > Frederick > > UMass Microbiologist Focuses on Iron-Eating > Bacteria > Findings have implications on beginning of life on > Earth > AMHERST, Mass. -- University of Massachusetts > microbiologist Derek Lovley has made a discovery > which opens a window to understanding how life began > on Earth. Lovley has determined that certain kinds > of microorganisms, which live several miles below > ground, can use iron to metabolize their food. The > findings are reported in the Sept. 3 issue of the > journal Nature, and will be featured in an upcoming > segment of the television show "Discover Magazine," > on the Discovery Channel. > > Lovley, head of the microbiology department, > studies unusual forms of anaerobic microorganisms: > in other words, bacteria that transform their food > into energy without using oxygen. "The research > helps us to understand life on Earth a little bit > better," Lovley said, "but it also has a practical > side." His previous research has demonstrated that > microorganisms that can grow on iron can be used in > treating contaminated groundwater. The > microorganisms use petroleum contaminants, such as > benzene, as food, and literally eat away at > contamination. These organisms can also remove toxic > metals such as uranium and chromium from > contaminated waters. His most recent findings focus > on "hyperthermophiles": literally, those who love > hot temperatures. Hyperthermophiles are the > organisms most closely related to early forms of > life, from which modern bacteria, plants, and > animals have descended, Lovley said. > > It was previously believed that some of the first > microorganisms used sulfur to grow. But geologists > noted that sulfur did not exist in the proper form > on early Earth. There was, however, abundant iron, > so Lovley set about determining whether iron could > serve as an energy source for these early bacteria. > "You can't go back three billion years, but you can > study these hyperthermophiles, which are the modern > organisms most closely related to early life," said > Lovley. > > Studying seven species of hyperthermophiles, he > determined that every single one could use iron to > metabolize its food. This lends weight to the theory > that iron was essential for the growth of early life > on Earth, according to Lovley. One type of > hyperthermophile in particular, thermotoga, used > iron in a very central way, and sulfur in a very > trivial way, suggesting that iron was more central > to the metabolism of early organisms than sulfur. > All of the hyperthermophiles converted iron oxide to > the magnetic mineral, magnetite, during their growth > on iron. This is significant because geologists have > found large accumulations of magnetite on early > Earth. Furthermore, magnetite found deep below the > Earth's surface and in a Martian meteorite has been > thought to provide evidence for the possibility of > life existing in these extreme environments. > > The only authoritative reference that I can find > states that the Martian atmosphere consists of only > 0.13% molecular oxygen. That is a big problem for > finding many kinds of oxidative metabolism. Of > course, like plants on earth CO2 could be > photosynthesized, but that seems less probable in > the low solar flux. > > OTOH if all those beautiful blue rocks are really > cuprates.... well, on earth at least copper ore is > rarely found without small percentages of Pd and > Ni... > > Kervran's Proof of Biological Transmutation has > been mentioned many times here. Is there any obvious > reason why some kind of LENR could not have evolved > (ala Kervan) in Martian life? > > Jones > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Search - Find what you’re looking for faster http://search.yahoo.com From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 2 09:09:16 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i22H96D9025738; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 09:09:07 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i22H95eZ025696; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 09:09:05 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 09:09:05 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <009101c40079$4eb2ccc0$0591cbc1 pc> From: "Noel Whitney" To: References: Subject: Re: Magnetic motor URL is: http://www.magnethealer.com/learn.html Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 17:10:47 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53358 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Mark- If you could communicate with me off line I would be interested in some commercial discussions. Look forward to hearing from you Noel D. Whitney Quantum Leap Ltd Dublin Ireland Home Tel 00 3531 2854626 www.quantumleap.ie E-mail - info quantumleap.ie. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Goldes" To: Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 8:48 PM Subject: RE: Magnetic motor URL is: http://www.magnethealer.com/learn.html > Jed, > > Jones figured out the URL yesterday. I accidently had omitted it from my > earlier post. I confirmed he was correct last evening. > > One of our engineers had ordered the booklet and we will see what come of > it. This might well be a scam. > > If it should happen to be real, our firm would be delighted, but we are a > licensing firm and not in the magnet business. We will leave sales to > others. > > We do hope to develop toys of this general nature that we will license in > the future. > > Our business is the development and licensing of self-powered > generators(tm). We hope to have practical multi-kilowatt magnetic > generators under license by the end of the year. We are not seeking > publicity about our work, but plan to leave that to licensees. > > We also are developing Ultraconductors(tm) through a subsidiary. These are > a practical equivalent of ambient temperature superconductors. see > www.ultraconductors.com for more information. > > Mark > > Mark Goldes > Chairman & CEO > Magnetic Power Inc. > Room Temperature Superconductors Inc. > > > > > >From: Jed Rothwell > >Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com > >To: vortex-L eskimo.com > >Subject: Message sent to Mark Goldes about magic magnet motor > >Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 15:23:22 -0500 > > > >I sent the attached message to Mark Goldes about the claim he made here. > >However, I missed the web site address he is talking about. I still can't > >find it in the message stream. Maybe he is describing someone else's web > >site, not his own, and maybe he cannot address my questions. > > > >I apologize to Mark if he means someone else is selling this. Also, I would > >like to know who it is. > > > >If this is Mark, and the gadget works as advertised, he could to sell ten > >thousand of them in no time, at a huge profit. I thought he is in the > >magnet business, so I cannot understand why he wouldn't want to sell them. > > > >I agree with Explorecraft that this has the hallmarks of a scam. Even > >though I have not seen the photos he refers to, I already get that > >impression. If this is an honest, legitimate claim, the authors should make > >haste to correct this impression. > > > >Terry Blanton said this gadget was described in 1980. Does anyone know if > >there reports that it worked? Goldes said that he (or whoever it is) do not > >claim they invented it, and it has been around since the 1930s, so the > >authors are not trying to get away with anything on that score. > > > >- Jed > > > >- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > > > >Mark, > > > >Have you actually seen and operated one of these things? Will you offer a > >money back guarantee that it works? How long did it spin in the longest > >test you tried? > > > >I hope you realize this is a very fishy claim you are making. Why on earth > >would you not be willing to assemble and sell more of these things?!? Even > >if you have no patent for the device, you could easily make millions of > >dollars selling them. People make money selling popcorn, which was not > >invented lately. You could make tens of millions improving the gadgets. > > > >I would happy to pay $2,000 for an assembled, tested gadget that you > >certify will work. You send me the gadget first. I will pay if it works, or > >return it if it does not. > > > >- Jed > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Watch high-quality video with fast playback at MSN Video. Free! > http://click.atdmt.com/AVE/go/onm00200365ave/direct/01/ > > > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 2 09:10:05 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i22H9xD9026190; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 09:10:00 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i22H9wrQ026169; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 09:09:58 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 09:09:58 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <4044BFE0.4020309 rtpatlanta.com> Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2004 12:09:52 -0500 From: "Terry Blanton" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Impaled Ball Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------000403060800070308000603" Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53359 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------000403060800070308000603 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit This little clip is from the first PanCam image on sol 37 by Opportunity. The marble in the center clearly has a stalk extending to the "rock". --------------000403060800070308000603 Content-Type: image/jpeg; name="Mars_Berry_Stem.jpg" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline; filename="Mars_Berry_Stem.jpg" /9j/4AAQSkZJRgABAQEAYABgAAD/2wBDAAMCAgMCAgMDAwMEAwMEBQgFBQQEBQoHBwYIDAoM DAsKCwsNDhIQDQ4RDgsLEBYQERMUFRUVDA8XGBYUGBIUFRT/2wBDAQMEBAUEBQkFBQkUDQsN FBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBT/wAAR CACIAMADASIAAhEBAxEB/8QAHwAAAQUBAQEBAQEAAAAAAAAAAAECAwQFBgcICQoL/8QAtRAA AgEDAwIEAwUFBAQAAAF9AQIDAAQRBRIhMUEGE1FhByJxFDKBkaEII0KxwRVS0fAkM2JyggkK FhcYGRolJicoKSo0NTY3ODk6Q0RFRkdISUpTVFVWV1hZWmNkZWZnaGlqc3R1dnd4eXqDhIWG h4iJipKTlJWWl5iZmqKjpKWmp6ipqrKztLW2t7i5usLDxMXGx8jJytLT1NXW19jZ2uHi4+Tl 5ufo6erx8vP09fb3+Pn6/8QAHwEAAwEBAQEBAQEBAQAAAAAAAAECAwQFBgcICQoL/8QAtREA AgECBAQDBAcFBAQAAQJ3AAECAxEEBSExBhJBUQdhcRMiMoEIFEKRobHBCSMzUvAVYnLRChYk NOEl8RcYGRomJygpKjU2Nzg5OkNERUZHSElKU1RVVldYWVpjZGVmZ2hpanN0dXZ3eHl6goOE hYaHiImKkpOUlZaXmJmaoqOkpaanqKmqsrO0tba3uLm6wsPExcbHyMnK0tPU1dbX2Nna4uPk 5ebn6Onq8vP09fb3+Pn6/9oADAMBAAIRAxEAPwDg/wBg/wCH+saxoeupHd3MOlWZW6ScDzFV hn5c444wR9K9a+GzWur3LL4estStLeaaS3u55+7sxDSNkjC5w305716f8NNAg8FaY66Dc3Fp Ekf7u1t408on+EsSMnoe9dFZfEJ9E8J6poEnh77R4kuiZ4kjjT5w/Qggnafy6UAeQ2PgzRZI fEOl2ETrqUIKWs0+UjaTeCSM5yMfzrrPD3wHs4LTztWvss53IITlQzMMKSe/J49q4P4HeBfE NtJqFl4veCXVnu2uxmUO8MW77hIODXq3iaGVtLTTbDVJYrj7V9o82ZPJjSMYAwRw3OfegDxX xD4fuLC7YSwNEU4AkGCa6PwN8P7fxZd7bq4S1iRNzbsAN7c12HiTw7ovhmO1Os3T6rdX5Lxt A+92OOePbr7VDptj4fs7v7RcXt1Z2IG1kZSxLdeCP5exoA6D4e/s+eF/Ey6xJf3ayG3/AHMS QSAZJ5LHHbpXkGt6KdE16/sYwrW9vKY1fdu4wD1/GvRNU8T6Ejkx62uk6eqhVMe7dNnPDAdO o5rlNbtLSy8uYalbPa3DHZNPdLhjgHAyeeCKAMOOIx4MeWz2zjmrcEDzS7ZE2fLxznJqWFYW gtlt9T0+Sa5y0axzg5UdSMdcetac+mzaUIHE8F224MTG+4jNAGRFaM6koMgHBpWsW6sv44rc tYZPLYKASxJxjmnGL5dkrBM8EUAcvLCofAIK45Iqey0C81W8ihsLd7mV+iopYn8BWpc6WsKs sYLg98Ve8H+L5/AuuQahHAk5i/5Zt3FAHMatp0+i6l9iu1MF0BloW4YDOMkH6Gq8qlJtrde1 dR4+1eLxx4hm8SCJLKdYxC0OcbsknP4ZrmnlWY73IV+nX04oAnVSE6HpVSUEtwCasmaQKCg3 j1HNJEC5yRigAtj5ZL55I21IGGeooaHaOGx7VHtY+re+KALIKPwSMd8daa6bH4IIPIx2FRwK fNGePrV0wAuGB4AoAijiLSKcFsHpu21qIWE8bSYZM4G/kfTiqqyRrxtfI7r0qZDsIYqxUjgO f1FAHu2ieFYtLZo4I7qVVTEQt4ySc8ZDYwe/HtWfpOm6hpXjW4nvfk0uJXjtr6ZPMQ8KNzEf dIwck8AAVY0fU/CPhzxampeIPGunwXV1ta0s477EjbkV1Ma43MD0AHc+9Q/tG/FCHS/gFq2o LYTWlvHGwJkjEU0w+ZQ3Uk7iOBwT6dKAO0OlaFNqst1ctaJcqjb7iJhgqCOWI4xknmuE+Mfx J8DfDqGC11C70r7fc+Zt+2TpEiKhDEZPOcHIHevKLn4Oz/EP9kBRea5rGneJI9K8+ciVwJvk P7vYvOCD/FxkivD9D+GnwZ+GngzQtV8VLbXeq3N3DZltTn82WGNygZ9hJKHbu6c5oA+iNM+I Xw88dCKSfxdpj2cDtJaTLdqjDOMqwbDA/NjGOgFYOufEHwLKl9DpGpHWLxR5UMcEbXcPmdSW JG1cDjORz3rnIrT4aXHiv/hHvDXh7VNZZ4owZLO0+zojs3LNLIq5QAZ6dOa9O8VeBLD4V+H7 ma00hNWnIcQ2NtIysZCQAHdATt6nK89aAPNv+EWudftPtMFi6Ls3MqQgbB1x1PGCO5+tclrv w40TxDNBFq+mQStaklVaLDKe5yGU5xjvj2r6T+EfinWT4OvrbXtN0vTo5zIlvJYSZ2gAKyqz /MzBTncfb0rzLwfPDeeIdR8OappZWaa4QwajdT7zKGY7uV47gfgKAM7w6lroltbQQWsbxQw/ ZrcbADGrHpuHOeTwc/XmtRLFjmSIFoOpJAG3HBHH06nmt+88OtoWsPGtuskIysXmvndycOp/ u4xXUaNqcN/c+aNNE0QKAJIWRCF+9gggHNAHH2+pRW1oVit280nAkVd1dX4V8MnxTepa7laZ 4fNEEI3yNjOTgc9v0rovEA8K6Pp6yNcWFrd3kiqwMxfYQSduMnA561xOu+MvDsY1BbbVWjvI 4yGXSLUuGyCNokxn8j3oA7DQ/hYniGKZoNRgVI5fLK5BJwM8fr+VcDe+Ab28vWGkzQajDHIQ CHGCMkZ9xkH8j6Vw7az4LtvDKi61rxFpAlmSKezVLjc29eXXYx4G0gn3rW+D3gexv9K1SDwb 4v1zTbOyBeAEPsDMN2I45wwyM8kr1NADb6DT7PV7q3vrlEns2VJWhKpGpIBGXJ7gita38FWv iJ9thqkX204UQZ37j6E9uvXpXPWnwshsvHF14p1u81LxdeXghs8X6xR7ShIVVwgG7gkcd69O 03wfpev3tmbW0vrC4kHn+Wy+fkBXIdZFAAz8oHbgetAHmF/oU2na1eaXPLHbXls214mbCjgH jPXgg/jUFzbpaymIPDI3XMLcGvpTR/2a9I1aYRajqUo1a5f7Q7xId5iGB8zZxk4x07CvNvj7 8PNC+Fhie2d0jyE3s4IJyevA56UAeaBwAAy4Wp44kZCUBHPRqzrLVLW4udiXCSR7Q25emT2r fV7dkADBiR0zQBREQ2Me46Cp4pltyjMc8ZKUFFV/lXYPQnNJJCkjDJ+bFAF5NYiaJytpCjDj Ljk/SqUdxJOSSSwJ4z29qrTq0DiMDKt1Jq1alYfkVj68EUAa134+8K6rro8QN4G26xaf6PZz mQSMsYkBR8HocDGEyeK8Z+IPwjl8c6ReWk3izxLPDdXQmu7aW9JgYBv4FPOOnBr26TwvDZec tqGu5FYbHwwJ5O4sCMjjHtVKLTpLeQxvbq0MhwhcEvkn27ZoA8sufA17qHgRfClzrWpW2lkC Pzbe7kiLqP4WCuATjA5GePasDwZ+zF4K8IXYml0qbW7l3AWS+m3lW6rtJHX2zX0ppmkyWlrN G1rZTFlH74hiUU8cAdx1/GtnR/CV/od5ZQItrdQT3KxiYIWKuO3Pf5sfhQBi+D9Ou7uaK2ez RIfLAJuEYkKOnU+gI612UGvRaBCdPj01ZrkPv8ySFdh2gZxgk+/411E2pXOiaNLHPZQNdtMV ggji/eSLnCn1wcHFeZeLry+fUUvH064sSVKBkkBBLe35UAcH8RtJGu+L7LUJ47W1trSKRYYI pHI3yEZZgcKBURtrZWSU3hYxghCACeM8DPQbsHI45rorXwzf67bJetEnkbypnnwAAuAck84B rnPFmr+DfDtg0kWu2OtX8igx22nSmc5JABG0Nxn8KAKtxPuYrFOQFyqYJ+XnpmpbZPMiUzIb lRwEmyQB7YPrmrOn+IIls7aSTw4l1I8oFzMk2F2nlQvycmnf2+1/G0MlqLONZcrFFIGXGcZJ wMemPagBRiO1UvaotsW+QuCOfb1q4Z0lh8uOCK2GM7gdhJ96JJ1uYooZGVUhbIAHFK17AkhB RZM9yOlAGZeQJJtjhCy8ZfcxYA/l9KzrmyDsF3mPv+7JA/Mc1tyOolLqEXcMYSkXRL2/Rntb Z5UQfMyKWx+VAGP9otdKkW5ngn1eSFWeO0uL2VYiwB2eoGGI/hzjPPp3/wAK/wBoe+h1Kx0z X9C0/Q7MMTJcWN20gjRUOIwpABGR1HqK4Gd2AMboCRxlhg1RbS45RJLnawGOKAPV/ij+3HoH w/toLi2kabyL+S3ka0vkeIgg/fDMGU4CcdOR618GftQ/tQeNPjnbSQWWi6hZaMMOtxOmMj1B yePxr3+/8JaLqUzfbNJsL15P+Wk0CsR77iDzVy38PWaweWkcaRiMxALgAD0xtAoA+LvgX4S+ Ieq65a3WmC7m02KePz3zmPBI4578j8xX3pYWU/2WOZlJVV+YhMAHvnFN0+1sNPVIbbTLBSIu JoUKsHA4JORkg44wa1kk09X+zxC5jB4ExXf8p4yRtBHU9vxoArofN5644qeKANJnuKguN0Yd YG82MgHzNrDnv1q7pMa3CsxIODtJz3oAJrIyKpCZ564qldWc0LZRT+Vd/o3hu61CAtZwedn5 SBzn6e9VdS0mWKMCWHyl+6Nwxk0Ab3xHv9N8KLZXmp+K/D/h+J13GWSJY5JC3QAuGBzjqoya 5bwH440rxfcavL4Z16LX5dPjDSiG1XbKvRirlfmIz2xzjj18+8RWcnjS6tJNcjS++yAiAXES 7U3ck8Y+7njiup8N3sfhWKEaZAYpsFHZsNG6fKB8pwB/ET+FAHcLawwadZTSM0C3ayyyGXEU YxywbgZAAPSqPhL4n2mha+5u4Xu/D5IhYQxkPG8e3MiB+Dlu/cE1558RE1rxVaaXY32sajb2 FmVaOO1k2pKDgbXG3kEcFdwGSau+HdWnLXFjdw6ctpdMsj/a4XxCwQqBGFLAZIU5zjmgD0O2 /aT8Ka/NajWri7sVicvP9o06ZgCCQFXCHPJzwcYFcJqPxDHxA1G9lgutSjtYrpmsvJsfIh2L 9wFpIgc43d8fdrhvBev6tr0TXWr2NppOo2sjRZsdwaQKcBjuGMkc/lXoen6jrmnRG8VWvrDc JJY5owd6rglQdvfI7+tAGT440weM2jimutTuNLiYsLJL1488JkOAcEZXOMZyTWXofhzRPDsS WFrZR2llEoj2RoMKQMHkgHP/AMSa9SvvF3g+7uYI7eL+zNPkRLqWSdGypLYCAMdpAG4k5/Di uRtf7A1fxPp+lRazbT6pfQPcW9rG6hyoKqmcHAJBbjrwaAF8T2mn2rI1hcRGCVlZbQ/fTIwG PpjFZHkM8gQZ8zPyxgcn/wCt3rrPEHhibw1frBdwvDdPy25enJx1rntdtru4tQk1xKkEjLh4 nMfQng4IyPpQBSmJMhjEkbMh2kxsCCfUY/L8KekbKOefep9Ms2CBWwqg8qpOB9MknH/161Lv R5YXRViJLIJMqc/KScH9DQBkqEc9fm9q09M8R3uhJNBbM2y4XDjHb1qO902K3SMxSl5SRuTH OantdNnli8zyTtzwc8GgDn57XMuCxLMdw3H1qlcieLcoTep6sgzgV28NqttcwNdWkrxFwN8X 3hj0PQGvctX8IeCm+E/2trCCG8MLF5ZwROjdck9CeVz9R60AfIpUKcKc9/8AP5VLDhlxnv2q q9lqGlaabvVYEtbmdTPBbK4aSVdxVW29QNuDj0570+FvLwoAcjqc9e1AGrDbqQGWR1cdADgV sWLbsvMxViu314rCtZGMgJGB9a2kG/aVPQcgd6ANWa0mi0j7VBA88W/yyyITg4B6/jUmhj7T MtsrmLcvLS4Khj6n2xWUFuYphLHO0GBwuB/LrVo3fmr5sxd7lfusxJzQB3nhjXovDHiu0Wa8 t2slXMuf9Wr4b5h6nIH6V1BvPCc1pf2t/rNtPDFIAl1K6mJ3wCMYPHXH414nIFuAGkCZfl8g nH0rmfFHgrSvE9t9jvreK7tM5McqkLn1zkHPFAHTOrpIElHlnO3aepNKJDaSsobO5SMEnIPs BWvrnxCtdVtWM/hrytRwVE9k4ijbknc67Tnr6ntT9ATw7qWiGfUNYttK1FZCpW7lCpsAByMr 6k/lQA6512y1ZbWC+tbuIQRqizLIs/IIPKHgfjzXM3klsyRhEmD8E70C5PTtwPpWjp+teGNb 8QPo2l+K9FvrlYvN2W8wKHkjluFzx0PtUh05LuW4gtbqzvp4eJIra5jkZR64Qn9aAOVngEdz hG+Z+cAd61Ue7ijDJPLFIkZCJn5T9R71BqWk3elSB7qCW1UkRp5qkc9uvf2qzaS7Y/mlDEHB 3UAW9U8S2esrpyatoKzxwRmNmRgBjaccBTg5J5PFO+GfwTtte8RwawdDtmLkiGSLCzLGFHSQ gc8ngHtWddXCFgQUOOo9RXH+JTq8wCWeralZQ+WVUWN28OO/8LL+eaAPq268HWfh/U7fQXt3 vItQJ3zzSNJJCwAICkk/N+ntXd+OfCdvp/gz+xtL0sSTzw7d8kYD7sDOWPfkfnXxf4c+NPjz whpaLZ3sWrXdpGVgHiBftCjgfxY35/4Eam0j9vn4t6RrRbxH8PLTWbSJCRJpF35ZJxjAWTcR zj8unWgD6Eh8DaJpmkaOmshhqRHlJZ26sCSC3zHs3Jxn2xU9x8HLy7ktNVS3W0sY1PnwXjBR IF2nJK9OGPH+ya8L0/8A4KTaZZ+JbefxT8MNf02WKAkva4nDPuXHzDA7E16Zc/8ABRv4NeMP B0zahd3ukNNblZtO1O1eNz/s4AJYH8KAOq8CeCdB8eXWo+ItMvLfUdPtpntY0jVxBG6/3Xbh 8ZByMjmvXPDeg2cunlrS3j8pTscQ9GYdccda/O/4lf8ABT/QPhy1ho3w6sLXUdKtFBa2itvJ gweSoOAc/mOevXHo3wS/4KveDvEh8jxLp9z4chkCqJfs+YInBydzoGOOR1XPvQB9IfHtb/w9 4cW80LREvtRYmO3Ztg2SYO3cXwoUE859RXxl4A+PHxDf4PTaBDp62fjUT3EOqX+qT+YiHzGD CNV4YbcYHTgV6J42/bF+FPx38RXXgu78XrpGiO0U6ag+8J5yucBA5A2nK5PHTpXT/DD9hjwl o1ndeMdP+IOreJdMvfMmjS3kT7M3zsGIwTxuB/KgDwfTdH1CZIb3XtUfWtVfERmkf5EB5IRR wqjHQevvWqiGFxxtJ52+lS+JBbaZ49vdIspDLHbDfnOQoyRjPrxUs9obyZTHguBnaRk0ASxR 7skE59BWxZZEQBOD79ay7aKVdxZUx0OOOa1LVflHGKALGHwcEn60okYD5sfjVqErjgqfxqte sueoBx0zQAx5SeOPwqPOTt4x6mliV5EyOlOMLnGcc0AaGsaeLdzgoUYbl2dh6H3rHNhG4/eK skXOVxnmtK7uTIeuT+tUfPyCC+4/TFAFOPw3p9rCRbwQwQlizIv8R+g5qax0m1tpC1nGlg79 XiXazemf/r1KHyNoGeeoqVFI/wB6gDd8RaxPrmmaXYSPlbVjPLJIPmdwABz6cD9a5yWIQkr/ ABE7j7k1cjEkhwSB7mp2sVZgGcFiP4eaAMVImaUccHg5pGtQ+9WA4bAz6VvDSXRS3G0cZfjF VLm0aBcsUUEZHPUetAHOXWmIpxhcYqAadFGhjYAFj2xmte4UIjuylvlyABzx3+lV3t2FrBdS SxOJSQURgWTjuO3WgDMfw/HNEd6KSeQGrIvfB9jPC0U9nA6ufm3ruH5YrtbKRpAiso29yaXU bSIvhGVsjsaAPGH/AGffBMt3JKdBshK3z7xHwT/u/d/rXU6b4C0qHTjaLplitqnBiC8H8MYr sFtRH8rLhTzk1Zjs4Y1wpBDHnmgDxvxb+zX4P8WuJF09tPcMMyWqqm4Zzjr6jrXqPwu+Jvj/ AOBHgKXwTp1nH4m0JQ/2N5Ljy5rfcxOwkcFR1z6k1uRxQphcjA96twpaCVUljZYyQTIoz+GK APnK/wBe8ceFNd1TWdV0hdTW/fLpaSFmiH90ep+la/gr9rfwtourxz6npd2Gt/kkhnjGTjtg 8mvede8F2GqRmWHVoPLU7/LZShOB0x3r5f8Aib+yqmp+I577TdUR4ZG3GNsgZPJ5P1oA9j0z 43+F/inqsp0FVtWdt/2cx7SPwrsLORwREqDDdcCvGvgx8EoPh5M+pNKLi5K7ML2/zmva9OjY ASjLEcnIoAtCA25K84qlfEMQqjDjncemPStpXFwu5xg1h6xKiPgMBx60AOgmGwhT+FbGmxR3 Cqsjojk4G9gAPr7Vy0DgyD5vw7VqpIrRtGNocgHAbIxQBWuyDIu5C4HbBx+dVpyZTiMgj/Z4 FWLu43MVXlT1xUUSBTgdPWgBkJMc6xj5SRnGc5rYRQjgN1xUUKII2YvgjoBg5qWJslSyjGP4 RQBI4UEfI5P+yKs274x1QZGd4xSxvGcbcL7Nwaj1FwtuSCMngYNAHVeDfif4N8Lwyw+J9Kmu pogSLmBBLkZ4GP61xnjT9rj4XafP/wAS7wZ4im2hxKsWmMfM9CpIxj29q5m42xzN5sau5HQj 5sVmyRRSMy+WFB6K/B/LFAHU/Dr9qTwL4pv5oLjwDq+jqsDzSXd/aKkHyjhcAHLHjtXJW3xl /wCFlWvmWmgT2c6T/NJNB5aBAx+Ub8HOCOAMVLHbwiMoVZGI4aNjj8eKv2VqtvH8oG7HOOaA NOwZdhV1YsWJBU8AGp5lEXORk9MsDUNsCQua1YXtoQvmoHJPUDcQKAMwweauJflbsPUVBJH5 bhVxjHc4rq9QstKaxEsN6JpiP9TIm3H41znlK6P0B6ACgBsUJcZ4BHoavwwhwFbOOtVrWNo8 Ag4PtU6SFc5BGDgfSgC39ihEZBjAPqTmsm701VYuANo6jtWgt08hwKsW9q94RCMEv0z0oAwo YYmyxbaOm1Twa29OZEVUVAqN1Oc1L4h+H2teHbUXt3p8lvaAbnkdSq7PXJqppc0E0e6Jt6Dp jnigDQniWEZU/L05rMv4ldDlto9K0DMuSByCMAHoPes67VWyCeaAMKVdj5Qn05Oav2asB5mC SflqIwgSALzn1q/GuxcHAOKAMRLklX3cHPerdrKrJjcM46ZrMnY+bhuK0bCRVTbhSSetAGhF xjPHFWkYAjkVTWQRnBPJqdJFbhgNnUsTigDQjYn7rfliquoxyPBtZjwcg1YhVIyMcKRkEnrU 1yoKEMOMZyaAOQnjwsm52Y9QpOBVAIrpuZlLgHAAxj2q7qjESnAO31qgAGFADIF3Iu7OfSta 2WNbdju+b0JrORSWIUbiBkgVNESwJzxQBrWspkjG7AI4q35aydSQfasyCVQFGQDjpmtGBwe4 oAa5ETeUG3E889adHH5Z+b60sgk81SgJXvipzbl1LYI57nNAC7lHQgfjUcrKI2ORnHrUq2sb Y3MM/Wmy23l/dJxjpigCjaSJI43bXww+RuB+dbtp4nGnavFfRQxqsEibIQMqQDzmubulIfk7 PccClghMo68etAHu3x9+OVh4r+HL6foNq01/eQ+QFmXakBYYLn6YrwfwzZyaVpFrC7q8qQhH ccb2HU1OrS2x2M/mRtztByBU27JG0DA/ugigC4hMigk4OOhqG4jJweo9qu2aoYGdjhhwBioJ d8w6dOOBQBRAUyoOlaA095TuUFgP4gOKh+yHhsc1teF9Ti0/XrMXqqbLzFMgYdRnmgDzd52n k3MMEHGKvWbgMOaKKAL0mWdau2rxKh3jJ7DtRRQBZt2OwnIPf6ewq3LMZrck44XFFFAHJamN 5wDWeE2DBoooAeG+TGCCDnI7+1SwE8luCT0oooAnghLSbtp/KtGIEMMiiigDShPBxjpU+f3e DgHFFFAE0SAW+NwHtioGh3KSuGHuaKKAM2+tSRkrwB1FZWT5vDkAenSiigC2jZIyQTirUTrn 7w/OiigC5C/YHt0qwpAUcY470UUABLD7q5FQTxCcbm+8BwKKKAP/2Q== --------------000403060800070308000603-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 2 09:13:16 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i22HD7D9027586; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 09:13:11 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i22HD6Ha027571; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 09:13:06 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 09:13:06 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Reply-To: From: "Keith Nagel" To: "Vortex" Subject: Sulfates found on Mars Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 12:38:12 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Importance: Normal X-Rcpt-To: Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53360 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: In the grand tradition of vortex, you heard it here first... (Poetic translation provided by google). The Tuxedo Gun has been found! K. "Opportunity" finds proof for Mars floods Of Thorsten Dambeck The proof succeeded to the Mars Rover "Opportunity" that on Mars once water flowed. How MIRROR ON-line ONE from NASA circles experienced, will the US space agency the discovery this evening admits to give. "I am baff, I am surprised", said Steve Squyres, scientific director/conductor of the Rover mission, in view of the photos of the second Mars vehicle "Opportunity". No other landing place resembled the far level Meridiani subgrade level, in which the sister probe of "Spirit" had come down. Particularly done showed up the researcher of the bright gesteinsformation, which out-peeped directly before the camera eyes of the Rovers from the dark Mars and. After detailed mineralogical and chemical analysis of the rock in the last weeks it seems now clear that Squyres spontaneous enthusiasm was justified. As MIRROR ON-line ONE from circles of the US space agency experienced, it concerns with the rock formation sediments, which were formed definitely in a standing waters. First suspicion confirms The "tuxedo Gun", the irrefutable proof for the existence of past tides on Mars, is one in the stones discovered sulfate connection, which can be formed only in the environment by water. NASA wants to present the results in the today's Tuesday evening at 20 o'clock German time on a press conference in Washington. The first close-ups of the formation had already fed the suspicion of the Planetologen that the rocks could have resulted from sedimentation, thus by deposit. The individual layers were to be constituted on the highly dissolving snapshots of the panorama camera of "Opportunity" clearly. The Moessbauer spectrometer "Mimos II" of the Mainzer of physicist Goestar Klingelhoefer might have played an important contribution with the discovery, which is responsible for the mineralogical analysis of eisenhaltiger Mars rocks. Break-through with German instruments Already on 9 February German members of the Rover Forschertruppe had announced surprising results of its APXS instrument ("alpha Particle x-Ray Spectrometer"). Afterwards analyses with the spectrometer in a bright rock with the name "Robert E" had resulted in by far higher contents of zinc and sulfur than with all Mars breaking into examined so far. "this points on it that the stone a solidified, salzhaltige deposit and not volcanic origin is", explained a coworker of the max Plack institute for chemistry, where the APXS spectrometer was built. In addition, if non-volcanic processes were more and more favored: NASA researchers stressed into the past week again and again that different developing mechanisms - also variants without the influence of liquid water - for the rock formation at "Opportunitys" are conceivable landing place. Now, then it seems, however liquid water running made. Thus the US Rover from the soil would have confirmed, what had already recognized the European probe "Mars express" from the orbit: At the end of January Esa scientist the breath-robbing pictures of the red planet as clear proof had rated that on Mars once rivers and seas existed. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 2 09:28:14 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i22HSAD9000515; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 09:28:11 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i22HS7nM000493; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 09:28:07 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 09:28:07 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <00df01c40073$43d220e0$2d80b341 computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: References: <20040302165926.50937.qmail web11701.mail.yahoo.com> Subject: Re: Martian metabolism Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 10:27:29 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-ELNK-Trace: 0b1c9d71006e06a171639b933de7ae6f7e972de0d01da940b51d439c089c2b419adb572bf14ef78f350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53361 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: ----- Original Message ----- From: "alexander hollins" > si, carbonates freed from rock would be an oxygen > pathway possibilities. You don't need O2 for "metabolism" . All you need is a chemical reaction that releases energy. The CO produced from the solar (ultraviolet photon) splitting of the Martian CO2 atmosphere reduces FeO to Fe + O, same as a steel mill, or the H2 in the atmosphere (ultraviolet splitting of H2O to H + OH) reduces FeO to Fe + H2O etc. > > also, your looking at CURRENT > life. for all we know, mars once had a thicker > atmosphere with more o2. There is ample evidence that earth's early atmosphere had virtually no free O2 ie., before photosynthesis/plant life "evolved". Regards, Frederick From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 2 09:39:03 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i22HcwD9004710; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 09:38:59 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i22HcvEr004691; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 09:38:57 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 09:38:57 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <011101c40074$cb4639c0$2d80b341 computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: Subject: Re: Martian metabolism Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 10:38:19 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-ELNK-Trace: 0b1c9d71006e06a171639b933de7ae6f7e972de0d01da940b356c17c71857d2fa046e9bcf43c1461350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53362 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Oops. > The CO produced from the solar (ultraviolet photon) splitting of the Martian CO2 > atmosphere reduces FeO to Fe + O, same as a steel mill, or the H2 in the atmosphere > (ultraviolet splitting of H2O to H + OH) reduces FeO to Fe + H2O etc. Should Be: The CO produced from the solar (ultraviolet photon) splitting of the Martian CO2 atmosphere reduces FeO to Fe + CO2, same as a steel mill, or the H2 in the atmosphere (ultraviolet splitting of H2O to H + OH) reduces FeO to Fe + H2O etc. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 2 10:17:12 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i22IH1D9018390; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 10:17:07 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i22IGvC0018348; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 10:16:57 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 10:16:57 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <20040302181644.91518.qmail web80411.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 10:16:44 -0800 (PST) From: Jones Beene Subject: Martian Marble Metabolism To: vortex-l eskimo.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53363 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Frederick Sparber writes, > The CO produced from the solar (ultraviolet photon) splitting of the Martian CO2 atmosphere reduces FeO to Fe + CO2, same as a steel mill, or the H2 in the atmosphere (ultraviolet splitting of H2O to H + OH) reduces FeO to Fe + H2O etc. Is there enough UV coming in? Also wouldn't the CO2 already in the atmosphere scatter and downshift much of the UV before it reaches the surface? I guess the main problem with either iron-eating or carbonate-eating biological life is "what is the energy source" for breaking the rather strong oxygen bonding? Mars is cold and has a low solar flux - which does not necessarily eliminate the sun being the energy source, but in evolution - if there were any valid competing methods, they might fare well. I wonder if that German spectrograph can tell us if the calcium-to-potassium ratio is altered over normal ranges in any of those "brine" areas. BTW look at the shadows on Terry's "impaled ball" photo. Is the ball really marble sized? The stalk elevates the ball a fair distance at an oblique angle, a close analogy being some kind of a ball fungus. Jones From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 2 10:41:37 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i22IfSD9028551; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 10:41:29 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i22Ieh1c028177; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 10:40:43 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 10:40:43 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <4044D506.2090102 rtpatlanta.com> Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2004 13:40:06 -0500 From: "Terry Blanton" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Martian Marble Metabolism References: <20040302181644.91518.qmail web80411.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20040302181644.91518.qmail web80411.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53364 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Jones Beene wrote: >BTW look at the shadows on Terry's "impaled ball" >photo. Is the ball really marble sized? The stalk >elevates the ball a fair distance at an oblique angle, >a close analogy being some kind of a ball fungus. > We need to remember that this is another planet. Life there might have no analogy on earth. Horace's lichen and the fungal balls could be something like . . . are you ready for this?? . . . Funchen! (Don't say it out loud in mixed company.) From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 2 12:08:08 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i22K82D9029870; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 12:08:02 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i22K7reI029807; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 12:07:53 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 12:07:53 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <20040302200743.16200.qmail web11708.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 12:07:43 -0800 (PST) From: alexander hollins Subject: Re: Impaled Ball To: vortex-l eskimo.com In-Reply-To: <4044BFE0.4020309 rtpatlanta.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53365 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: no lr images, so cant make stereoscopic, and the filters that came through are 4-7, so colorizing is iffy, but any way you try to combine for colors, the tip shows the same as some of the spheroids around on teh ground, but not the stalk, it stays the same as the rock. --- Terry Blanton wrote: > This little clip is from the first PanCam image on > sol 37 by > Opportunity. The marble in the center clearly has a > stalk extending to > the "rock". > > > > ATTACHMENT part 2 image/jpeg name=Mars_Berry_Stem.jpg __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Search - Find what you’re looking for faster http://search.yahoo.com From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 2 12:26:47 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i22KQgD9005052; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 12:26:43 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i22KQf8V005035; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 12:26:41 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 12:26:41 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 11:31:37 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: Impaled Ball Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53366 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 12:09 PM 3/2/4, Terry Blanton wrote: >Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > >This little clip is from the first PanCam image on sol 37 by >Opportunity. The marble in the center clearly has a stalk extending to >the "rock". Excellent example! There have been other hints of stems on the berries. See shadow at lower left >http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/p/035/1P131297854ESF0500P2598 R1M1.HTML < See possible stem structures in two berries at right of grind photo: >http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/m/035/1M131296470EFF0500P2952 M1M1.JPG< and also in >http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/m/034/1M131212854EFF0500P2959M >2M1.HTML< Seems like the stem material, if it exists, may not melt and/or decay as fast as the overal matrix. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 2 12:39:26 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i22KdJD9010512; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 12:39:20 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i22KdIvn010492; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 12:39:18 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 12:39:18 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 11:44:23 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: Martian Marble Metabolism Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53367 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 1:40 PM 3/2/4, Terry Blanton wrote: >Jones Beene wrote: > >>BTW look at the shadows on Terry's "impaled ball" >>photo. Is the ball really marble sized? The stalk >>elevates the ball a fair distance at an oblique angle, >>a close analogy being some kind of a ball fungus. >> > >We need to remember that this is another planet. Life there might have >no analogy on earth. Horace's lichen and the fungal balls could be >something like . . . are you ready for this?? . . . > >Funchen! > >(Don't say it out loud in mixed company.) Hmmm... I guess that means Mars is all funched up? 8^) Actually lichen IS by definition part fungus part bacteria (and/or algae). See . There is no need to dream up exotic alien metabolisms (not that they might not exist!) because it is well known that some terrestrial species of lichen can live in a martian atmosphere at martian temperatures. This kind of experiment was done (I think by NASA I think) way back in the 60's or 70's if memory serves. It was also done back then by high school kids for science projects. There is no need for a continual intense light source. That is because the lichen on Mars, if it exists, is only thawed when the light source is strong. It "lives" only a small percentage of time. It is frozen the rest. What a weird existence. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 2 12:48:00 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i22KlkD9014049; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 12:47:46 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i22KlivK014030; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 12:47:44 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 12:47:44 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 11:52:58 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Worm wake-ups? Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53368 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: I keep getting messages with no text. They zip right on by the email filter because there is nothing to key on to filter. No attachments. They seem to be attempts to communicate with a resident worm or virus. The message seems to be: "(S:15.43666/98.94254 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:98.9607 C:78.1961 )" or "&M)!!cgA"!aK]"!Z&P!!". Anyone else getting this kind of thing or have any ideas what it is about? Could be just a probe to see if it bounces? The message: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (exprod5mx14.postini.com [12.158.34.154]) by goliath.mtaonline.net (8.12.9/8.12.10) with SMTP id i22K8q6X018499; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 11:08:53 -0900 (AKST) Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 11:08:52 -0900 (AKST) From: GDKBE msn.com Received: from source ([24.13.109.99]) by exprod5mx14.postini.com ([12.158.34.245]) with SMTP; Tue, 02 Mar 2004 14:08:50 CST Received: from 28.12.200.0 by 24.13.109.99; Tue, 02 Mar 2004 19:02:50 -0100 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 12:01:57 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: AIP notes bubble fusion experiment Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53369 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE The American Institute of Physics Bulletin of Physics News Number 675 March 3, 2004 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein BUBBLE FUSION, the apparent generation of fusion energy through the violent collapse of bubbles in a liquid tank, has been reported in a paper about to be published in Physical Review E (Taleyarkhan et al., upcoming, probably March 2004). The paper, a followup to a controversial report published two years ago (http://www.aip.org/enews/physnews/2002/split/579-2.html), reports "statistically significant neutron and gamma ray emissions" after sound waves and pulsed neutrons hit a chilled liquid acetone tank spiked with deuterium fuel. The researchers (Rusi Taleyarkhan, formerly at Oak Ridge but now at Purdue, 765-494-0198, rusi purdue.edu ) report the observation of flashes of light (sonoluminescence) as well as the emission of neutrons with energies of less than or equal to 2.5 MeV---what you would expect if pairs of deuterium atoms were fusing together to produce energy in their setup. While the researchers describe various improvements to their experimental setup, in response to comments received in their original paper 2 years ago, critics (including Aaron Galonsky, Michigan State, galonsky nscl.msu.edu, 850-267-8976 by phone until April 1) still have a number of concerns. According to Galonsky, the data for neutron emissions is lumped together with data of gamma-ray emissions. While separating neutron and gamma-ray signals is challenging, it is necessary to have a clean neutron-only spectrum to have an unambiguous demonstration of nuclear fusion. Willy Moss of Livermore (925-422-7302, wmoss llnl.gov) says "Although I believe that thermonuclear sonofusion [not to be confused with cold fusion] may not be impossible...I am still not convinced... I believe that additional tests need to be done and many should have been performed and discussed in the paper, for example...if neutrons are being generated, then how about moving the scintillator further away from the sample to see if the signal decreases, due to the decreasing solid angle of the detector?" (Other experts, Richard Lahey, RPI, laheyr rpi.edu , 518-276-6614, a co-author on the paper; Mike Saltmarsh, Oak Ridge, 865-576-6915, saltmars mail.phy.ornl.gov, co-author of a paper that attempted to duplicate the initial results but reported a null result---see Shapira and Saltmarsh, Phys Rev Lett, 19 August 2002) From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 2 13:25:13 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i22LP4Zp030073; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 13:25:10 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i22LOtPA030028; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 13:24:55 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 13:24:55 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f From: Baronvolsung aol.com Message-ID: <144.235c595b.2d76557b aol.com> Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 16:24:11 EST Subject: UN Plans To Destroy the USA With Weather Control & Tesla Force Fields To Stop It To: SENATOR_MCCAIN MCCAIN.SENATE.GOV, senatorlott@lott.senate.gov, senator_lugar lugar.senate.gov, Roundtable7@yahoogroups.com, rbutner earthlink.net, detroit@fbi.gov, vortex-l@eskimo.com CC: Baronvolsung aol.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1078262651" X-Mailer: 9.0 for Windows sub 5007 Resent-Message-ID: <81UH2.A.IVH.nuPRAB ultra5.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53370 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: -------------------------------1078262651 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Language: en I have posted below emails on Tesla force fields and weather control ideas=20 that may be used to prevent the Illuminati and the United Nations from=20 destroying North America with weather control plans. A small ice age can be= created in=20 North America by modifying the ocean heat conveyer belt a few degrees and th= e=20 wobble of the Earth with present day satellite and Earth based weather=20 control technologies.=20 The emails posted below explain how to use Tesla electroscalar waves,=20 photonic and neutrino energies to change weather and create diseases in popu= lations=20 by placing the disease pattern in photons; and how to jam weather control=20 devices and nuclear radiation with a series of Tesla scalar wave force field= s.=20 I have first listed below a snippet of the Tesla force field that can be use= d=20 to shield us from nuclear and biochemical fallout from weapons, and then I=20 have listed the complete email post which discuses the use of Telsa scalar w= aves=20 used to change weather and to create diseases in whole populations. I also=20 have listed lastly below an Internet post on solar satellites used to change= =20 and engineer the weather over any region on Earth and links to the US milita= ry=20 weather control plans by 2025, Russian Weather Control Energetics, the Unite= d=20 Nations (UN), & Illuminati's goal to use weather control to remove all=20 civilization from the USA and North America under the UN disguise of Sustain= ability &=20 Biodiversity, and an article on the Ice Age and the Ocean Conveyer Belt=20 Theory. =20 Konstantin Meyl has published a book in English called Scalar Waves which is= =20 only available at the amazon.com website in Germany at http://www.a-zet.de/=20= ,=20 which discusses the math, science, and applications of scalar waves. I have= =20 also developed a personal scalar wave jammer and froce field device posted a= t=20 http://www.rhfweb.com/sjam.html. =20 Tesla Force Field:=20 http://www.freedomdomain.com/weathercontrol/scalarweapon01.html=20 --TERMINAL ABM SYSTEM--=20 Very neat things can be done if one "nests" several Tesla shields --=20 say three or four -- concentrically, one inside the other. In that case even= =20 the nuclear radiation (such as gamma rays) from a defense-suppressive high=20 altitude nuclear burst can be handled.=20 For example, suppose three such concentric shields are placed over a=20 large vital area. Further, suppose a high altitude nuclear burst is placed=20 above the outer shield. Gamma radiation almost instantly strikes the plasma=20 in the outer shell, where it is absorbed, scattered, and re-radiated at a=20 lower temperature. (That after all is what plasmas do.) Inside the first=20 shell, the scattered radiation is now in the x-ray and ultra violet region.=20 Let us track the most lethal component, the x-rays.=20 The scattered x-rays then strike the second plasma shell, and are=20 absorbed scattered and re-radiated at a lower temperature. Inside the second= =20 shell the scattered radiation is now in the visible and infrared region, wit= h=20 a little ultraviolet.=20 This optical radiation in turn strikes the third plasma shell, and is=20 absorbed scattered and re-radiated at still lower temperature. Inside the=20 third shell, most of the energy is now in the form of radio frequency (RF)=20 energy, with a little IR and visible band spectral energy content.=20 At this point, ordinary electromagnetic interference (EMI) shielding of= =20 electronic equipment on the ground inside the third shield can take care of=20 any RF interference resulting from the emergent RF noise.=20 As can be seen, three shells are sufficient to convert the gamma and=20 x-ray radiation (and ultraviolet and infrared) mostly to harmless RF energy=20 before all three shells are penetrated. Thus the tactic of deliberate defens= e=20 suppression by a preliminary high altitude nuclear burst can be countered by= =20 multiple Tesla shields.=20 In addition, of course, any ordinary vehicles penetrating all three=20 shields are exposed to successive violent EMP's and are almost certainly=20 electrically dudded. The vehicles are also subjected to multiple periods of=20 intense heating, so combustibles, fuels, explosives, and ablatives are=20 destroyed. In addition, metal structures may be melted or vaporized.=20 Think of it this way: anything which hits one of these Tesla shields=20 goes phhht! Just like a bug hitting an electrified bugkiller screen.=20 For years passing ships have observed and reported such multiple-shield= =20 "light phenomena" over remote regions of the ocean. U.S. intelligence has=20 routinely not paid any heed to "lights at night" over remote ocean areas, an= d=20 so Soviet tests in this manner have remained relatively unnoticed by=20 officialdom...=20 Further Information on Tesla Weather Control Technologies are posted at the=20 link Below: http://www.freedomdomain.com/weathercontrol/scalarweapon01.html=20 http://www.borderlands.com/spacewea.htm Space Based Weather Control:=20 The "Thunderstorm Solar Power Satellite" In a recent correspondence with Dr. Bernard Eastlund (see below), it appears= =20 that ground based weather control via electromagnetic means have been=20 surpassed by the newer technology of Solar Power Satellite based systems whi= ch have=20 been designed for a power output of 1000 Megawatts. Even though this Solar P= ower=20 Satellite based system is speculative at best, I think we can all see where=20 this is going. HAARP, as we have stated, does not appear to possess the ability to alter th= e=20 weather over disparate geographic locations, and has only a minute ability t= o=20 do anything locally =E2=80=94 remember, radiation from the Sun strikes the a= tmosphere=20 with a power density of 1370 Watts per meter2 or 0.137 Watts per cm2, a valu= e=20 known as the "solar constant." The intensity of HAARP's HF signal in the=20 ionosphere will be less than 3 microwatts per cm2 at its full power potentia= l of=20 3.6 Megawatts =E2=80=94 tens of thousands of times less than the Sun's natur= al=20 electromagnetic radiation reaching the earth. But, these new satellite syste= ms, if=20 indeed they can generate the power proposed, certainly would solve that prob= lem.=20 With a fleet of these satellites, it could be conceivable that the weather=20 over any geographic location could be modified at will =E2=80=93 provided th= e system=20 actually works. Borderlands published a book related to this in 1995 called=20 Secrets of Cold War Technology: Project HAARP and Beyond. Borderland Sciences has over the years done an extensive observation of the=20 effects of solar activity on the general population with respect to temperme= nt=20 modification. It has been empirically confirmed that SIDs (Sudden Ionospheri= c=20 Disturbances), and Solar Flux Density increases have the particular effect o= f=20 mania on the general populace, while low periods tend to display a tendency=20 toward depression. We wonder what effects these new high power satellite systems could have on=20 prevailing psychological states. Although it does not appear intentional, th= e=20 ability to alter the moods of populations is one probable side effect of suc= h a=20 modification system. While this is not "mind control" per se, it does open u= p=20 some interesting possibilities. It remains to be seen what the true potentia= l=20 of these satellites will be. Michael Theroux US Military Weather Control by 2025 http://www.au.af.mil/au/2025/volume3/chap15/v3c15-1.htm Russian Weather Control Energetics: http://twm.co.nz/Beard_wmod.htm Illuminati's goel to use weather control to remove all civilization from the= =20 USA and North America.=20 http://www.cuttingedge.org/news/n1695.cfm The Ice Age and the Ocean Conveyer Belt Theory http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=3D17711 Baron Von Volsung, www.rhfweb.com\baron, Email: www.rhfweb.com\emailform.htm= l President Thomas D. Clark,=20 Email: www.rhfweb.com\emailform.html, Personal Web Page:=20 www.rhfweb.com\personal New Age Production's Inc., www.rhfweb.com\newage Star Haven Community Services, at www.rhfweb.com\sh Radiation Health Foundation Trust at www.rhfweb.com -------------------------------1078262651 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Language: en

I have posted below emails on Tesla force fields and weather control idea= s that may be used to prevent the Illuminati and the United Nations fro= m destroying North America with weather control plans.  A small ice age= can be created in North America by modifying the ocean heat conveyer belt a= few degrees and the wobble of the Earth with present day satellite and Eart= h based weather control technologies.=20

The emails posted below explain how to use Tesla electroscalar waves, pho= tonic and neutrino energies to change weather and create diseases=20= in populations by placing the disease pattern in photons; and how to jam wea= ther control devices and nuclear radiation with a series of Tesla scala= r wave force fields.=20

I have first listed below a snippet of the Tesla force field th= at can be used to shield us from nuclear and biochemical fallout f= rom weapons, and then I have listed the complete email post which discuses t= he use of Telsa scalar waves used to change weather and to create diseases i= n whole populations.  I also have listed lastly below an Internet post=20= on solar satellites used to change and engineer the weather over any re= gion on Earth and links to the US military weather control plans by 2025, Ru= ssian Weather Control Energetics, the United Nations (UN), & Illuminati'= s goal to use weather control to remove all civilization from the USA and No= rth America under the UN disguise of Sustainability & Biodiversity, and=20= an article on the Ice Age and the Ocean Conveyer Belt Theory.  =20

Konstantin Meyl has published a book in English called Scalar Waves=20= which is only available at the amazon.com website in Germany at http://www.a-zet.de/ ,= which discusses the math, science, and applications of scalar waves. =20= I have also developed a personal scalar wave jammer and froce field device p= osted at http://www.rhfweb.com/sjam.html

Tesla Force Field:=20

h= ttp://www.freedomdomain.com/weathercontrol/scalarweapon01.html=20

--TERMINAL ABM SYSTEM--=20

      Very neat things can be done if one "nests= " several Tesla shields --
say three or four -- concentrically, one insi= de the other. In that case even
the nuclear radiation (such as gamma ray= s) from a defense-suppressive high
altitude nuclear burst can be handled= .=20

     For example, suppose three such concentric shiel= ds are placed over a
large vital area. Further, suppose a high altitude=20= nuclear burst is placed
above the outer shield. Gamma radiation almost i= nstantly strikes the plasma
in the outer shell, where it is absorbed, sc= attered, and re-radiated at a
lower temperature. (That after all is what= plasmas do.) Inside the first
shell, the scattered radiation is now in=20= the x-ray and ultra violet region.
Let us track the most lethal componen= t, the x-rays.=20

     The scattered x-rays then strike the second plas= ma shell, and are
absorbed scattered and re-radiated at a lower temperat= ure. Inside the second
shell the scattered radiation is now in the visib= le and infrared region, with
a little ultraviolet.=20

     This optical radiation in turn strikes the third= plasma shell, and is
absorbed scattered and re-radiated at still lower=20= temperature. Inside the
third shell, most of the energy is now in the fo= rm of radio frequency (RF)
energy, with a little IR and visible band spe= ctral energy content.=20

     At this point, ordinary electromagnetic interfer= ence (EMI) shielding of
electronic equipment on the ground inside the th= ird shield can take care of
any RF interference resulting from the emerg= ent RF noise.=20

     As can be seen, three shells are sufficient to c= onvert the gamma and
x-ray radiation (and ultraviolet and infrared) most= ly to harmless RF energy
before all three shells are penetrated. Thus th= e tactic of deliberate defense
suppression by a preliminary high altitud= e nuclear burst can be countered by
multiple Tesla shields.=20

     In addition, of course, any ordinary vehicles pe= netrating all three
shields are exposed to successive violent EMP's and=20= are almost certainly
electrically dudded. The vehicles are also subjecte= d to multiple periods of
intense heating, so combustibles, fuels, explos= ives, and ablatives are
destroyed. In addition, metal structures may be=20= melted or vaporized.=20

     Think of it this way: anything which hits one of= these Tesla shields
goes phhht! Just like a bug hitting an electrified=20= bugkiller screen.=20

     For years passing ships have observed and report= ed such multiple-shield
"light phenomena" over remote regions of the oce= an. U.S. intelligence has
routinely not paid any heed to "lights at nigh= t" over remote ocean areas, and
so Soviet tests in this manner have rema= ined relatively unnoticed by
officialdom...

Further Information on Tesla Weather Control Technologies are posted at t= he link Below:

h= ttp://www.freedomdomain.com/weathercontrol/scalarweapon01.html

http://www.borderlands.com/spacewea.htm

Space Based Weather C= ontrol:
The = "Thunderstorm Sol= ar Power Satellite"


In a recent correspondence with Dr. Bernard Eastlund (see below), it appe= ars that ground based weather control via electromagnetic means have been su= rpassed by the newer technology of Solar Power Satellite based systems which= have been designed for a power output of 1000 Megawatts. Even though this S= olar Power Satellite based system is speculative at best, I think we can all= see where this is going.

HAARP, as we have stated, does not appear to possess the ability to alter= the weather over disparate geographic locations, and has only a minute abil= ity to do anything locally =E2=80=94 remember, radiation from the Sun strike= s the atmosphere with a power density of 1370 Watts per meter2 or= 0.137 Watts per cm2, a value known as the "solar constant." The=20= intensity of HAARP's HF signal in the ionosphere will be less than 3 microwa= tts per cm2 at its full power potential of 3.6 Megawatts =E2=80= =94 tens of thousands of times less than the Sun's natural electromagnetic r= adiation reaching the earth. But, these new satellite systems, if indeed the= y can generate the power proposed, certainly would solve that problem. With=20= a fleet of these satellites, it could be conceivable that the weather over a= ny geographic location could be modified at will =E2=80=93 provided the syst= em actually works. Borderlands published a book related to this in 1995 call= ed Secrets= of Cold War Technology: Project HAARP and Beyond.

Borderland Sciences has over the years done an extensive observation of t= he effects of solar activity on the general population with respect to tempe= rment modification. It has been empirically confirmed that SIDs (Sudden Iono= spheric Disturbances), and Solar Flux Density increases have the particular=20= effect of mania on the general populace, while low periods tend to=20= display a tendency toward depression.

We wonder what effects these new high power satellite systems could have=20= on prevailing psychological states. Although it does not appear intentional,= the ability to alter the moods of populations is one probable side effect o= f such a modification system. While this is not "mind control" per se, it do= es open up some interesting possibilities. It remains to be seen what the tr= ue potential of these satellites will be.

Michael Theroux

US Military Weather Control by 2025

http://www.au.a= f.mil/au/2025/volume3/chap15/v3c15-1.htm

Russian Weather Control Energetics:

http://twm.co.nz/Beard_wmod.htm

Illuminati's goel to use weather control to remove all civilization from=20= the USA and North America. 

http://www.cuttingedge.org/news/n1695.cfm=

The Ice Age and the Ocean Conveyer Belt Theory

http://www.alternet.org/sto= ry.html?StoryID=3D17711

B= aron Von Volsung, www.rhfweb.com\baron, Email: www.rhf= web.com\emailform.html
President Thomas D. Clark,
Email: www.rhfweb.com\emailform.html, Personal Web Page: www.rh= fweb.com\personal
New Age Production's Inc., www.rhfweb.com\newage<= /A>
Star Haven Community Services, at
www.rhfweb.com\sh
Radiation Health= Foundation Trust at www.rhfweb.com

-------------------------------1078262651-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 2 13:34:57 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i22LYqZp001450; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 13:34:53 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i22LYois001421; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 13:34:50 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 13:34:50 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <20040302213440.4833.qmail web11701.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 13:34:40 -0800 (PST) From: alexander hollins Subject: color wheel To: vortex-l eskimo.com In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53371 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: btw, for those making color landscapes of mars, heres the actual color wheel http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/mission/images/sundial1_250.jpg __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Search - Find what you’re looking for faster http://search.yahoo.com From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 2 13:47:07 2004 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) id NAA00794; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 13:39:30 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 13:39:30 -0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: rick+highsurf.com mail.highsurf.com Message-Id: Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 11:39:14 -1000 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Rick Monteverde Subject: Rover news conf.: goofy scientists Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id NAA00510 Resent-Message-ID: <"hasEK3.0.KC.IyFH01" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53372 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: These guys ought to be in politics. In response to questions about the apparent mud/brine effect, one guy - think it was the main geologist, appeared not to understand the question, or even which planet the question was being asked about! Even after it was repeated and rephrased he answered as if a completely different question had been asked. Don't talk about brine on the surface, let alone threads, structures, etc. I really can't figure it out. As smart as I know these people are *in some areas* I think they may just be stump stupid on some common sense things. It's easy to see conspiracy, but you know the saying about conspiracy vs. human stupidity, selfishness, etc. It's so frustrating because they achieved so much in designing and successfully deploying these marvelous machines to another planet, yet they dumb up when it comes to interpreting, or disseminating the results. I don't know if it's mud, mold, lichens, bacteria, salts & crystals, or what, but it's all over the place, and if the question come up, they'll blow it off and act as though someone asked if there are lakes of pesto sauce on Venus or something. That's bizarre. The Weekly World News doesn't look like such a bad source after all by comparison. - Rick From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 2 13:54:04 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i22Ls0Zp009742; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 13:54:01 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i22LrrmC009677; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 13:53:53 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 13:53:53 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <00f701c400a0$c585bca0$c828010a arghou.argcorp.argworldwide.com> From: "SnowDog" To: References: <20040302213440.4833.qmail web11701.mail.yahoo.com> Subject: Re: color wheel Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 21:53:17 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Mar 2004 21:53:23.0222 (UTC) FILETIME=[C8862B60:01C400A0] Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53373 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: > btw, for those making color landscapes of mars, heres > the actual color wheel > > http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/mission/images/sundial1_250.jpg Good picture, but unfortunately, you can't use the color wheel to help you balance other pictures taken with the PanCam. Picture sets which include the color wheel are already balanced for color using filters L4, L5 and L6. Images of the landscape are balanced using some other method -- probably to make the images much brighter than they would be if balanced for color. To re-balance the images of the landscape, do this: 1) Find a good spot of red soil in your picture. 2) Using images from L4, L5, and (L6 or L7), for red, green, and blue respectively, balance the red soil so that the intensity of the soil is 2 to 2 1/2 times as bright in the L4 image as it is in the (L6 or L7) image. 3) Balance the L5 image so that it is 15% - 20% brighter than the (L6 or L7) image. I used the spectra-analysis done on a picture taken by Spirit, on Sol 7, to come up with these relative values. It works because all the soil is pretty much the same bright red color. I applied this technique to a picture of the landscape, (which use to include blue desert varnish), and it looks pretty similar to other pictures released by NASA. http://216.169.108.12/golddirectory/mars/mars7.htm Craig Haynie From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 2 14:27:06 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i22MR2Zp023158; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 14:27:03 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i22MQt2m023103; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 14:26:55 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 14:26:55 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <20040302222638.42151.qmail web11708.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 14:26:38 -0800 (PST) From: alexander hollins Subject: Re: color wheel To: vortex-l eskimo.com In-Reply-To: <00f701c400a0$c585bca0$c828010a arghou.argcorp.argworldwide.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53374 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: not quite. the reason the color wheel is on there and why they snap shots of IT in all the filters is to allow them to use it to color balance against atmospheric light conditions. and... color based on an assumption of soil color... naw. im working right now on using channels with rgb set based on the wavelength of the filter, so that you can put in all the images, but right now its coming up muddy. i think i need to invert the channels before pasting in, becuase of how ps channels work, but dont have the time for further experimentation now. --- SnowDog wrote: > > btw, for those making color landscapes of mars, > heres > > the actual color wheel > > > > > http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/mission/images/sundial1_250.jpg > > Good picture, but unfortunately, you can't use the > color wheel to help you > balance other pictures taken with the PanCam. > Picture sets which include the > color wheel are already balanced for color using > filters L4, L5 and L6. > Images of the landscape are balanced using some > other method -- probably to > make the images much brighter than they would be if > balanced for color. To > re-balance the images of the landscape, do this: > > 1) Find a good spot of red soil in your picture. > > 2) Using images from L4, L5, and (L6 or L7), for > red, green, and blue > respectively, balance the red soil so that the > intensity of the soil is 2 to > 2 1/2 times as bright in the L4 image as it is in > the (L6 or L7) image. > > 3) Balance the L5 image so that it is 15% - 20% > brighter than the (L6 or L7) > image. > > I used the spectra-analysis done on a picture taken > by Spirit, on Sol 7, to > come up with these relative values. It works because > all the soil is pretty > much the same bright red color. I applied this > technique to a picture of the > landscape, (which use to include blue desert > varnish), and it looks pretty > similar to other pictures released by NASA. > > http://216.169.108.12/golddirectory/mars/mars7.htm > > Craig Haynie > > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Search - Find what you’re looking for faster http://search.yahoo.com From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 2 14:39:21 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i22MdEZp028864; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 14:39:14 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i22MdCBu028841; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 14:39:12 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 14:39:12 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <012301c400a7$29440ac0$c828010a arghou.argcorp.argworldwide.com> From: "SnowDog" To: References: <20040302222638.42151.qmail web11708.mail.yahoo.com> Subject: Re: color wheel Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 22:38:55 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Mar 2004 22:39:03.0866 (UTC) FILETIME=[2A1341A0:01C400A7] Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53375 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Hello! > not quite. the reason the color wheel is on there and > why they snap shots of IT in all the filters is to > allow them to use it to color balance against > atmospheric light conditions. > and... color based on an assumption of soil color... > naw. I just spent a week figuring this out. If you succeed, please let me know how, because the images of the soil are balanced differently than the images of the color wheel. In fact, all images with the rover in the foreground are already balanced for color, while images of the landscape are balanced using some other algorithm. The only way you're going to get rid of the blue rocks is to use the spectra-analysis available here, http://216.169.108.12/golddirectory/mars/mars6.htm and balance according to the numbers. The problem is that this method will not work for the other landscape images, unless the same algorithm was applied to the image. Maybe this is the case. This is the area I'm looking at next. If I can verify that there are only two algorithms used, then the spectra-analysis will let me balance all of the landscape images. On the other hand, if you could find the native files sent by the rover, then I'm all ears! > im working right now on using channels with rgb set > based on the wavelength of the filter, so that you can > put in all the images, but right now its coming up > muddy. i think i need to invert the channels before > pasting in, becuase of how ps channels work, but dont > have the time for further experimentation now. How do you set a photoshop channel to a certain wavelength? This would be helpful. Sincerely, Craig From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 2 15:21:22 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i22NLFZp015794; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 15:21:16 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i22NL2Bl015709; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 15:21:02 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 15:21:02 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 14:26:04 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Lots of ice fond on Mars Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53376 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: See: Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 2 15:30:36 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i22NUWlg021972; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 15:30:33 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i22NUPxe021887; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 15:30:25 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 15:30:25 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.1.4.030702.0 Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2004 18:33:06 -0500 Subject: Re: Rover news conf.: goofy scientists From: "Eugene F. Mallove" To: "vortex l eskimo.com" Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53377 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: On 3/2/04 4:39 PM, "Rick Monteverde" wrote: > These guys ought to be in politics. In response to questions about the > apparent mud/brine effect, one guy - think it was the main geologist, appeared > not to understand the question, or even which planet the question was being > asked about! Even after it was repeated and rephrased he answered as if a > completely different question had been asked. Don't talk about brine on the > surface, let alone threads, structures, etc. > > I really can't figure it out. As smart as I know these people are *in some > areas* I think they may just be stump stupid on some common sense things. It's > easy to see conspiracy, but you know the saying about conspiracy vs. human > stupidity, selfishness, etc. It's so frustrating because they achieved so much > in designing and successfully deploying these marvelous machines to another > planet, yet they dumb up when it comes to interpreting, or disseminating the > results. Rick, This is no more remarkable than the astounding stupidity of the reaction to CF/LENR and other O/U reports over the past 15 years. It is fully consistent. I predict this: The NASA people will see increasing evidence for extant or extinct life -- it will be staring them the face, and STILL they will act as though the evidence does not exist. After all, have the space cadets YET discussed the "Dalmatian dunes"? No, of course not! Have they commented on the parallel, vertex-tied triangles? No! If you had told me these things before the CF War, I would not have believed such human stupidity was possible in science -- surely if large geometric figures were seen on Mars by our priceless hard-won astronautical voyages, virtually every effort would be bent toward their analysis! Not so. But now I am a full believer in its omnipresence of stupidity within science. Just one look at any number of recent cover articles of "Discover" and "New Scientist" with all the dark energy horse crap and ponderings of pre-"Big Bang" existence is sufficient... NASA royally screwed itself with its gross mishandling of the Viking life evidence back in 1976 and thereafter. Now it is doing it again. It may take one of Sagan's "Mars mice" running across the damn screen to wake it up. Like it will take a "car driven up from New Jersey" to convince MIT's Petrasso of the validity of CF/LENR. -Gene Mallove www.infinite-energy.com > I don't know if it's mud, mold, lichens, bacteria, salts & crystals, > or what, but it's all over the place, and if the question come up, they'll > blow it off and act as though someone asked if there are lakes of pesto sauce > on Venus or something. That's bizarre. The Weekly World News doesn't look like > such a bad source after all by comparison. > > - Rick > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 2 15:46:46 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i22NkYlg029236; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 15:46:38 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i22NkWe2029198; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 15:46:32 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 15:46:32 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 14:51:41 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: Rover news conf.: goofy scientists Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53378 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 11:39 AM 3/2/4, Rick Monteverde wrote: >These guys ought to be in politics. In response to questions about the >apparent mud/brine effect, one guy - think it was the main geologist, >appeared not to understand the question, or even which planet the question >was being asked about! Even after it was repeated and rephrased he >answered as if a completely different question had been asked. Don't talk >about brine on the surface, let alone threads, structures, etc. Major amounts of ice on Mars just below the surface is very old news: Methinks there must have been an elephant in the room. 8^) I suppose hindsight is 20-20, but a soil conductivity testor would have cost almost nothing to put on the rover, in either dollars or weight. OTOH, perhaps some people don't want to test for conditions that contradict their mental models. The apparent lack of biologists on the rover team is certainly noteworthy. An obvious test for surface water is to dig/brush a hole in one of the wet flat sandy looking areas. As to the mission, the stated goal was to prove/disprove surface water in the history of Mars. Given that Global Surveyor already has shown shallow subsurface water exists on Mars, this seems at present to be a somewhat conservative goal. > >I really can't figure it out. As smart as I know these people are *in some >areas* I think they may just be stump stupid on some common sense things. >It's easy to see conspiracy, but you know the saying about conspiracy vs. >human stupidity, selfishness, etc. It's so frustrating because they >achieved so much in designing and successfully deploying these marvelous >machines to another planet, yet they dumb up when it comes to >interpreting, or disseminating the results. I don't know if it's mud, >mold, lichens, bacteria, salts & crystals, or what, but it's all over the >place, and if the question come up, they'll blow it off and act as though >someone asked if there are lakes of pesto sauce on Venus or something. >That's bizarre. The Weekly World News doesn't look like such a bad source >after all by comparison. > >- Rick Scientific "conservatism" does seem a bit whacko, especially to lunatic fringers like me. 8^) But fortunately, the photos and data seem to speak volumes, and I am certainly greatful for their rapid dissemination. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Mar 3 04:35:09 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i23CYvlg029524; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 04:34:58 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i23CY3Cb029153; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 04:34:03 -0800 Resent-Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 04:34:03 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f From: "explorecraft" To: Subject: RE: Impaled Ball Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 19:31:32 +0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - lester.switchfusion.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - eskimo.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - explorecraft.com Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53379 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Just imagine: if the Opportunity crater was, for them, a harsh environment, there may be other sites where these grapes are larger, and/or more prolific. > -----Original Message----- > From: Horace Heffner [mailto:hheffner mtaonline.net] > Sent: Wednesday, 2004 March 03 03:32 > To: vortex-l eskimo.com > Subject: Re: Impaled Ball > > > At 12:09 PM 3/2/4, Terry Blanton wrote: > >Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed > >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > > >This little clip is from the first PanCam image on sol 37 by > >Opportunity. The marble in the center clearly has a stalk extending to > >the "rock". > > > Excellent example! There have been other hints of stems on the berries. > See shadow at lower left > > > >http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/p/035/1P131297854ESF 0500P2598 R1M1.HTML < See possible stem structures in two berries at right of grind photo: >http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/m/035/1M131296470EFF0500P2952 M1M1.JPG< and also in >http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/m/034/1M131212854EFF0500P2959M >2M1.HTML< Seems like the stem material, if it exists, may not melt and/or decay as fast as the overal matrix. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Mar 3 04:42:21 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i23CgElg032630; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 04:42:15 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i23Cg6kL032556; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 04:42:06 -0800 Resent-Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 04:42:06 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f From: "explorecraft" To: Subject: RE: Rover news conf.: goofy scientists Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 19:39:59 +0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - lester.switchfusion.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - eskimo.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - explorecraft.com Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53380 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Where did I see that quote: collective intelligence is lowered to the average of the room/organization whatever? Individually very bright, these guys are like deer trapped in the headlights of a bureaucratic freight train. Although we give'em 'ell for being part of such a monstrously moronic followup to a technical masterpiece, they need credit for living in a publicity fishbowl. > -----Original Message----- > From: Horace Heffner [mailto:hheffner mtaonline.net] > Sent: Wednesday, 2004 March 03 06:52 > To: vortex-l eskimo.com > Subject: Re: Rover news conf.: goofy scientists > > > At 11:39 AM 3/2/4, Rick Monteverde wrote: > >These guys ought to be in politics. In response to questions about the > >apparent mud/brine effect, one guy - think it was the main geologist, > >appeared not to understand the question, or even which planet > the question > >was being asked about! Even after it was repeated and rephrased he > >answered as if a completely different question had been asked. Don't talk > >about brine on the surface, let alone threads, structures, etc. > > > > Major amounts of ice on Mars just below the surface is very old news: > > > > Methinks there must have been an elephant in the room. 8^) > > I suppose hindsight is 20-20, but a soil conductivity testor would have > cost almost nothing to put on the rover, in either dollars or weight. > OTOH, perhaps some people don't want to test for conditions that > contradict > their mental models. The apparent lack of biologists on the rover team is > certainly noteworthy. > > An obvious test for surface water is to dig/brush a hole in one of the wet > flat sandy looking areas. > > As to the mission, the stated goal was to prove/disprove surface water in > the history of Mars. Given that Global Surveyor already has shown shallow > subsurface water exists on Mars, this seems at present to be a somewhat > conservative goal. > > > > > >I really can't figure it out. As smart as I know these people > are *in some > >areas* I think they may just be stump stupid on some common sense things. > >It's easy to see conspiracy, but you know the saying about conspiracy vs. > >human stupidity, selfishness, etc. It's so frustrating because they > >achieved so much in designing and successfully deploying these marvelous > >machines to another planet, yet they dumb up when it comes to > >interpreting, or disseminating the results. I don't know if it's mud, > >mold, lichens, bacteria, salts & crystals, or what, but it's all over the > >place, and if the question come up, they'll blow it off and act as though > >someone asked if there are lakes of pesto sauce on Venus or something. > >That's bizarre. The Weekly World News doesn't look like such a bad source > >after all by comparison. > > > >- Rick > > > Scientific "conservatism" does seem a bit whacko, especially to lunatic > fringers like me. 8^) But fortunately, the photos and data seem to > speak volumes, and I am certainly greatful for their rapid dissemination. > > Regards, > > Horace Heffner > > > > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Mar 3 07:07:28 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i23F7Klg004676; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 07:07:21 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i23F76kY004543; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 07:07:06 -0800 Resent-Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 07:07:06 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <4045F462.4000704 rtpatlanta.com> Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 10:06:10 -0500 From: "Terry Blanton" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Virus warning!! Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53382 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: DO NOT OPEN the .pif file coming from Vortex. For that matter, never open an emailed .pif file. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Mar 3 07:20:23 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i23FKFlg009617; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 07:20:16 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i23FKBAo009580; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 07:20:11 -0800 Resent-Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 07:20:11 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f From: "explorecraft" To: Subject: RE: Virus warning!! Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 22:17:32 +0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <4045F462.4000704 rtpatlanta.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - lester.switchfusion.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - eskimo.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - explorecraft.com Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53383 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Where got .pif from Vortex? I have not yet seen this... > -----Original Message----- > From: Terry Blanton [mailto:blantont rtpatlanta.com] > Sent: Wednesday, 2004 March 03 22:06 > To: vortex-l eskimo.com > Subject: Virus warning!! > > > DO NOT OPEN the .pif file coming from Vortex. > > For that matter, never open an emailed .pif file. > > > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Mar 3 07:20:43 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i23FKUlg009911; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 07:20:31 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i23FKOSm009766; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 07:20:24 -0800 Resent-Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 07:20:24 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <20040303151944.6556.qmail web11707.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 07:19:44 -0800 (PST) From: alexander hollins Subject: Re: color wheel To: vortex-l eskimo.com In-Reply-To: <007601c40109$54330620$6401a8c0 Craig> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53384 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: much easier for that method, is to go to the layers panel on a new image. to the right of the layers tab is the channels tab. Click on it and youll see r b g and all channels. Just click on one channel and paste, and it will paste the image in to just that channel. Also, a nice feature is as you change channels and if you simply copy and paste the seperate images off the nasa website, it pastes them perfectly on top of each other, no need to align them yourself. also, the particular filters you mention dont correspond with rgb like that. 2 5 and 7 on L are pretty close (two of them are dead on, forget which ones) which is why im trying the more directed approach by creating channels, so your images are going to be blue shifted. --- GDC wrote: > I use photoshop for many of the images I put > together here: > > http://216.169.108.12/golddirectory/mars/mars1.htm > > The method is to: > > 1) Load 3 images into photoshop from filtered images > L4, L5, and (L6 or L7) > > 2) Go to Image/Duplicate to create another image of > the same type, and call > it whatever you want to call the new file. > > 3) Select the Red Channel, then go to Image/Apply > Image. And apply the image > by selecting the image from L4, and by changing the > 'Blending' method to > Normal. If the blending method is not changed, then > the image will come out > muddy. I'm not sure if this is why your images are > coming out muddy, but I > had this problem too, for this reason. > > 4) Do the same for the green and the blue channels. > > This should give you a basic color image. > > Craig > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "alexander hollins" > > To: "GDC" > Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2004 9:41 PM > Subject: Re: color wheel > > > > well, what i did was take a program that gave rbg > > values for any wavelength you might add, and used > > those to create new channels instead of using rgb > in > > photoshop. unfortunetly, rgb in photoshop > actually > > filters as the opposite color. i tried inverting > > after adding the layers in, but that didnt work, > too > > dark and muddy. so im working on it. and yeah, i > do > > agree with you, they have messed with brightness, > but > > they did so on color wheel too. i was just saying > > using the color wheel to practice to get a feel > for > > the colorizing. > > --- GDC wrote: > > > I think it's a matter of degree. When you've > > > finished the color wheel, try > > > doing the same thing with a picture of the > > > landscape. If you are inclined, > > > use the first image in this series: > > > > > > > > > http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/spirit_p007.html > > > > > > This is the image that they did the spectra > analysis > > > on. I think you'll find > > > that the blue and green images, L7, L6, and L5 > are > > > FAR brighter than they > > > should be -- than the similar images of those of > the > > > color wheel. You'll > > > have to use a different technique to balance > this > > > image, than you did with > > > the color wheel. > > > > > > Please let me know how it turns out. This is > > > exciting to me, and something > > > I've been working on all week. > > > > > > Sincerely, > > > > > > Craig > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "alexander hollins" > > > > > > To: "GDC" > > > Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2004 22:59 > > > Subject: Re: color wheel > > > > > > > > > > odd, when im taking images of the color wheel > and > > > > putting them together, im finding that it > > > certainly > > > > ISNT balanced perfectly, and does in fact > require > > > a > > > > little balancing against that other pic i > linked. > > > > --- GDC wrote: > > > > > Hello again! > > > > > > > > > > Take a look at this spectra-analysis. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://216.169.108.12/golddirectory/mars/mars6.htm > > > > > > > > > > Notice that there are eleven datapoints > across > > > the > > > > > spectrum. Each datapoint > > > > > references one of the filtered images. The > first > > > one > > > > > is L7, then L6, L5, L4, > > > > > etc. Notice the intensities of the different > > > parts > > > > > of the image through each > > > > > of these filters, as recorded by the > > > > > spectra-analysis. These intensities are > > > > > very different than those in most of the raw > JPL > > > > > files -- the files with > > > > > images of the landscape. [Images of the > color > > > wheel > > > > > are balanced perfectly.] > > > > > You'll get a lot of blue in your images, > unless > > > you > > > > > cut the intensity of the > > > > > blue in your images, according to how > > > > > spectra-analysis tells us it should > > > > > be. > > > > > > > > > > Sincerely, > > > > > > > > > > Craig Haynie > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________ > > > > Do you Yahoo!? > > > > Yahoo! Search - Find what you're looking for > > > faster > > > > http://search.yahoo.com > > > > > > > > > __________________________________ > > Do you Yahoo!? > > Yahoo! Search - Find what you're looking for > faster > > http://search.yahoo.com > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Search - Find what you’re looking for faster http://search.yahoo.com From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Mar 3 07:23:27 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i23FNJlg011327; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 07:23:21 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i23FNGqF011290; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 07:23:16 -0800 Resent-Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 07:23:16 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <20040303152245.7043.qmail web11707.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 07:22:45 -0800 (PST) From: alexander hollins Subject: Re: Impaled Ball To: vortex-l eskimo.com In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53385 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: if they ARE concretions, which seems likely, then its not unheard off. concretions form by minerals that precipitate in openings in the rock. you also get some minerals precipitating, though not as well and as dense, in the channels that allowed the water in in the first place. --- Horace Heffner wrote: > At 12:09 PM 3/2/4, Terry Blanton wrote: > >Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed > >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > > >This little clip is from the first PanCam image on > sol 37 by > >Opportunity. The marble in the center clearly has > a stalk extending to > >the "rock". > > > Excellent example! There have been other hints of > stems on the berries. > See shadow at lower left > > > >http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/p/035/1P131297854ESF0500P2598 > R1M1.HTML < > > > See possible stem structures in two berries at right > of grind photo: > > > >http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/m/035/1M131296470EFF0500P2952 > M1M1.JPG< > > and also in > > >http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/m/034/1M131212854EFF0500P2959M > >2M1.HTML< > > > Seems like the stem material, if it exists, may not > melt and/or decay as > fast as the overal matrix. > > Regards, > > Horace Heffner > > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Search - Find what you’re looking for faster http://search.yahoo.com From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Mar 3 07:31:18 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i23FV4lg015581; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 07:31:05 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i23FV1Yt015422; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 07:31:01 -0800 Resent-Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 07:31:01 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <20040303153017.9724.qmail web11703.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 07:30:17 -0800 (PST) From: alexander hollins Subject: Re: color wheel To: vortex-l eskimo.com In-Reply-To: <00c901c40119$98c1e2b0$6401a8c0 Craig> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53386 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: aha. thought so. thanks, great find. of course, that means if we had an earth shot with each filter, we could use those for calibration to verify the camera is taking correct colors. --- GDC wrote: > Hello again! > > This article describes why each image can't be > calibrated with the color > wheel. > > http://www.atsnn.com/NASAIsNotAlteringMarsColors.html?story=30048 > > Craig > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Search - Find what you’re looking for faster http://search.yahoo.com From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Mar 3 08:06:30 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i23G5nlg030688; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 08:05:50 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i23G5NVQ030457; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 08:05:23 -0800 Resent-Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 08:05:23 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <20040303160434.16858.qmail web11703.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 08:04:34 -0800 (PST) From: alexander hollins Subject: odd triangle circle image times two To: vortex-l eskimo.com In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53387 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: link1 link2 the same odd looking circle on two faces... whats up? putting together the images where they have the right filters on right cam, theres a blue tinge around the cirlce. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Search - Find what you’re looking for faster http://search.yahoo.com From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Mar 3 08:14:11 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i23GE2lg002721; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 08:14:03 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i23GDtk7002651; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 08:13:55 -0800 Resent-Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 08:13:55 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.1.4.030702.0 Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 11:16:00 -0500 Subject: Nice try, NYT, but no cigar! Sonofusion vs. "Cold fusion" From: "Eugene F. Mallove" To: "vortex l eskimo.com" Message-ID: Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ultra5.eskimo.com id i23GDJlg002126 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53388 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: http://www.nytimes.com/2004/03/03/science/03FUSI.html?ei=1&en =56478ce1fabd1918&ex=1079296449&pagewanted=print&position= March 3, 2004 Experts Say New Desktop Fusion Claims Seem More Credible By KENNETH CHANG Scientists are again claiming they have made a Sun in a jar, offering perhaps a revolutionary energy source, and this time even some skeptics find the evidence intriguing enough to call for a closer look. Using ultrasonic vibrations to shake a jar of liquid solvent the size of a large drink cup, the scientists say, they squeezed tiny gas bubbles in the liquid so quickly and violently that temperatures reached millions of degrees and some of the hydrogen atoms in the solvent molecules fused, producing a flash of light and energy. "It can do some interesting science stuff as is," said Dr. Richard T. Lahey, a professor of engineering at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute and an author of a paper describing the findings that will appear in the journal Physical Review E. "Our interests are to see if we can't scale it up to something more exciting," he said. The experiment could conceivably shrink the science of fusion ‹ slamming hydrogen atoms together, producing heat and light ‹ from giant, expensive reactors to the tabletop. When this team of researchers made the same claim in an article in the journal Science two years ago, many scientists reacted with skepticism, even ridicule. But new experiments, using better detectors, offer more convincing data that the phenomenon is real. "We've addressed all the issues and now they all speak for themselves with far greater intensity than they did before," said Dr. Rusi P. Taleyarkhan, the scientist who conducted the experiments at Oak Ridge National Laboratory in Tennessee and is a professor of nuclear engineering at Purdue University. Skepticism remains, but Dr. Lawrence A. Crum, a professor of electrical engineering at the University of Washington who was highly critical of the Science paper, said the new work was "much better" and deserved attention to determine whether the effect could be reproduced. "It's getting to the point where you can't ignore it," Dr. Crum said. For decades, physicists have dreamed of harnessing the ferocious alchemy of the Sun as a clean, limitless energy source. Most experiments have been conducted in giant, expensive reactors using magnetic fields to confine the ultrahot gases. In contrast, the new experiment, which cost less than $1 million, uses the power of sound to create energy comparable to the inside of stars. To many scientists, however, the phenomenon, nicknamed sonofusion, bears uncomfortable similarities to "cold fusion," which has now been discredited. Sonofusion has already achieved more scientific respectability than cold fusion ever did, with two articles published in major journals. And unlike cold fusion, sonofusion is based on known science. Scientists have long observed a phenomenon known as sonoluminescence, in which a burst of ultrasound causes a bubble in a liquid to collapse and emit a flash of light; some have speculated that the gases trapped in the collapsing bubbles could be heated to temperatures hot enough for fusion to occur. Still, controversy enveloped the Science paper two years ago. The new research by Dr. Taleyarkhan and Dr. Lahey provides a much clearer picture of neutrons that are ejected when fusion occurs. Many scientists like Dr. Glenn Young, head of the physics division at Oak Ridge, said the experiment was solid, but still incomplete. "Neutrons are slippery little rascals," he said. "They can fool you. They can bounce and show up around corners you don't expect." Copyright 2004 The New York Times Company From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Mar 3 08:26:29 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i23GQHeF008238; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 08:26:24 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i23GQFJR008215; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 08:26:15 -0800 Resent-Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 08:26:15 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <20040303162544.19070.qmail web11707.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 08:25:44 -0800 (PST) From: alexander hollins Subject: Re: Rover news conf.: goofy scientists To: vortex-l eskimo.com In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53389 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: I disagree. What he was saying with that question is that they don’t know, but HERES how it works on earth. The thing to remember is that these are SCIENTISTS. You know, the scientific method. They have tools beyond the photos we have, and they will not comment until they are pretty sure. yes, im sure there are scientists looking at the threads and matchsticks, looking for signs of life. for all we know, they are silicon sulfur compounds, therefore NOT life as we know it, but possibly life. it has to be investigated. which would you prefer. taking a year to be certain, or a press conference saying "hey we found life!" and two months later, "uhhh, nevermind" --- "Eugene F. Mallove" wrote: > On 3/2/04 4:39 PM, "Rick Monteverde" > wrote: > > > These guys ought to be in politics. In response to > questions about the > > apparent mud/brine effect, one guy - think it was > the main geologist, appeared > > not to understand the question, or even which > planet the question was being > > asked about! Even after it was repeated and > rephrased he answered as if a > > completely different question had been asked. > Don't talk about brine on the > > surface, let alone threads, structures, etc. > > > > I really can't figure it out. As smart as I know > these people are *in some > > areas* I think they may just be stump stupid on > some common sense things. It's > > easy to see conspiracy, but you know the saying > about conspiracy vs. human > > stupidity, selfishness, etc. It's so frustrating > because they achieved so much > > in designing and successfully deploying these > marvelous machines to another > > planet, yet they dumb up when it comes to > interpreting, or disseminating the > > results. > > Rick, > > This is no more remarkable than the astounding > stupidity of the reaction to > CF/LENR and other O/U reports over the past 15 > years. It is fully > consistent. I predict this: The NASA people will see > increasing evidence for > extant or extinct life -- it will be staring them > the face, and STILL they > will act as though the evidence does not exist. > After all, have the space > cadets YET discussed the "Dalmatian dunes"? No, of > course not! Have they > commented on the parallel, vertex-tied triangles? > No! If you had told me > these things before the CF War, I would not have > believed such human > stupidity was possible in science -- surely if large > geometric figures were > seen on Mars by our priceless hard-won astronautical > voyages, virtually > every effort would be bent toward their analysis! > Not so. But now I am a > full believer in its omnipresence of stupidity > within science. Just one > look at any number of recent cover articles of > "Discover" and "New > Scientist" with all the dark energy horse crap and > ponderings of pre-"Big > Bang" existence is sufficient... > > > NASA royally screwed itself with its gross > mishandling of the Viking life > evidence back in 1976 and thereafter. Now it is > doing it again. It may take > one of Sagan's "Mars mice" running across the damn > screen to wake it up. > Like it will take a "car driven up from New Jersey" > to convince MIT's > Petrasso of the validity of CF/LENR. > > -Gene Mallove www.infinite-energy.com > > > > > I don't know if it's mud, mold, lichens, bacteria, > salts & crystals, > > or what, but it's all over the place, and if the > question come up, they'll > > blow it off and act as though someone asked if > there are lakes of pesto sauce > > on Venus or something. That's bizarre. The Weekly > World News doesn't look like > > such a bad source after all by comparison. > > > > - Rick > > > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Search - Find what you’re looking for faster http://search.yahoo.com From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Mar 3 08:55:25 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i23GtJ8s021163; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 08:55:20 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i23Gt6Ku021072; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 08:55:06 -0800 Resent-Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 08:55:06 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.2.20040303085934.00b12d70 mail.dlsi.net> X-Sender: stevek mail.dlsi.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9 Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 08:59:45 -0800 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Steve Krivit Subject: Re: Nice try, NYT, but no cigar! Sonofusion vs. "Cold fusion" In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53390 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: :) From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Mar 3 10:39:11 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i23Icp8s006971; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 10:38:57 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i23IcUMh006636; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 10:38:30 -0800 Resent-Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 10:38:30 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 09:43:13 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: RE: Virus warning!! Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53391 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 10:17 PM 3/3/4, explorecraft wrote: >Where got .pif from Vortex? > I have not yet seen this... > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Terry Blanton [mailto:blantont rtpatlanta.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, 2004 March 03 22:06 >> To: vortex-l eskimo.com >> Subject: Virus warning!! >> >> >> DO NOT OPEN the .pif file coming from Vortex. >> >> For that matter, never open an emailed .pif file. >> >> >> Your ISP may have a virus filter like mine does? Here is the header information from the bad message (which shows that the original source of the virus was smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]): - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - >Received: from source ([204.122.16.68]) by exprod5mx112.postini.com >([12.158.34.245]) with SMTP; > Wed, 03 Mar 2004 06:53:04 PST >Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) > by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i23Ed7lg022453; > Wed, 3 Mar 2004 06:39:16 -0800 >Received: (from smartlst localhost) > by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i23EcbWj022138; > Wed, 3 Mar 2004 06:38:37 -0800 >Resent-Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 06:38:37 -0800 >X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to >vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f >Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 09:39:47 -0500 >To: vortex-l eskimo.com >Subject: Warning about your e-mail account. >From: support eskimo.com >Message-ID: >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Content-Type: multipart/mixed; > boundary="--------pvjeqoiurnvfqgdupggw" >Resent-Message-ID: >Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com >Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com >X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53381 >X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com >List-Post: >List-Help: >List-Subscribe: >List-Unsubscribe: >Precedence: list >Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com >X-pstnvirus: W32/Bagle.j MM (ED) > boundary=" > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Mar 3 13:53:56 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i23Lrg8s003781; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 13:53:46 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i23LrTfU003653; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 13:53:29 -0800 Resent-Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 13:53:29 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.1.4.030702.0 Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 16:56:12 -0500 Subject: More on bubble fusion From: "Eugene F. Mallove" To: "vortex l eskimo.com" Message-ID: Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ultra5.eskimo.com id i23LrH8s003556 Resent-Message-ID: <_1FrDC.A.94.YPlRAB ultra5.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53392 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Theresa Bourgeois (518) 276-2840 bourgt rpi.edu http://www.rpi.edu/web/News/press_releases/2004/lahey.htm Researchers Report Bubble Fusion Results Replicated Physical Review E publishes paper on fusion experiment conducted with upgraded measurement system TROY, N.Y. — Physical Review E has announced the publication of an article by a team of researchers from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI), Purdue University, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), and the Russian Academy of Science (RAS) stating that they have replicated and extended previous experimental results that indicated the occurrence of nuclear fusion using a novel approach for plasma confinement. This approach, called bubble fusion, and the new experimental results are being published in an extensively peer-reviewed article titled “Additional Evidence of Nuclear Emissions During Acoustic Cavitation,” which is scheduled to be posted on Physical Review E’s Web site and published in its journal this month. The research team used a standing ultrasonic wave to help form and then implode the cavitation bubbles of deuterated acetone vapor. The oscillating sound waves caused the bubbles to expand and then violently collapse, creating strong compression shock waves around and inside the bubbles. Moving at about the speed of sound, the internal shock waves impacted at the center of the bubbles causing very high compression and accompanying temperatures of about 100 million K. These new data were taken with an upgraded instrumentation system that allowed data acquisition over a much longer time than was possible in the team’s previous bubble fusion experiments. According to the new data, the observed neutron emission was several orders of magnitude greater than background and had extremely high statistical accuracy. Tritium, which also is produced during the fusion reactions, was measured and the amount produced was found to be consistent with the observed neutron production rate. Earlier test data, which were reported in Science (Vol. 295, March 2002), indicated that nuclear fusion had occurred, but these data were questioned because they were taken with less precise instrumentation. “These extensive new experiments have replicated and extended our earlier results and hopefully answer all of the previous questions surrounding our discovery,” said Richard T. Lahey Jr., the Edward E. Hood Professor of Engineering at Rensselaer and the director of the analytical part of the joint research project. Other fusion techniques, such as those that use strong magnetic fields or lasers to contain the plasma, cannot easily achieve the necessary compression, Lahey said. In the approach to be published in Physical Review E, spherical compression of the plasma was achieved due to the inertia of the liquid surrounding the imploding bubbles. Professor Lahey also explained that, unlike fission reactors, fusion does not produce a significant amount of radioactive waste products or decay heat. Tritium gas, a radioactive by-product of deuterium-deuterium bubble fusion, is actually a part of the fuel, which can be consumed in deuterium-tritium fusion reactions. Researchers Rusi Taleyarkhan, Colin West, and Jae-Seon Cho conducted the bubble fusion experiments at ORNL. At Rensselaer and in Russia, Professors Lahey and Robert I. Nigmatulin performed the theoretical analysis of the bubble dynamics and predicted the shock-induced pressures, temperatures, and densities in the imploding vapor bubbles. Robert Block, professor emeritus of nuclear engineering at Rensselaer, helped to design, set up, and calibrate a state-of-the-art neutron and gamma ray detection system for the new experiments. Special hydrodynamic shock codes have been developed in both Russia and at Rensselaer to support and interpret the ORNL experiments. These computer codes indicated that the peak gas temperatures and densities in the ORNL experiments were sufficiently high to create fusion reactions. Indeed, the theoretical shock code predictions of deuterium-deuterium (D-D) fusion were consistent with the ORNL data. The research team leaders are all well known authorities in the fields of multiphase flow and heat transfer technology and nuclear engineering. Taleyarkhan, a fellow of the American Nuclear Society (ANS) and the program’s director, held the position of Distinguished Scientist at ORNL, and is currently the Ardent Bement Jr. Professor of Nuclear Engineering at Purdue University. Lahey is a fellow of both the ANS and the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), and is a member of the National Academy of Engineering (NAE). Nigmatulin is a visiting scholar at Rensselaer, a member of the Russian Duma, and the president of the Bashkortonstan branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS). Block is a fellow of the ANS and is the longtime director of the Gaerttner Linear Accelerator (LINAC) Laboratory at Rensselaer. The bubble fusion research program was supported by a grant from the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). ********** Purdue News. March 2, 2004 http://news.uns.purdue.edu/html4ever/2004/0400302.Taleyarkhan.fusion.html Evidence bubbles over to support tabletop nuclear fusion device WEST LAFAYETTE, Ind. – Researchers are reporting new evidence supporting their earlier discovery of an inexpensive tabletop device that uses sound waves to produce nuclear fusion reactions. The researchers believe the new evidence shows that "sonofusion" generates nuclear reactions by creating tiny bubbles that implode with tremendous force. Nuclear fusion reactors have historically required large, multibillion-dollar machines, but sonofusion devices might be built for a fraction of that cost. "What we are doing, in effect, is producing nuclear emissions in a simple desktop apparatus," said Rusi Taleyarkhan, the principal investigator and a professor of nuclear engineering at Purdue University. "That really is the magnitude of the discovery – the ability to use simple mechanical force for the first time in history to initiate conditions comparable to the interior of stars." The technology might one day, in theory, lead to a new source of clean energy. It may result in a new class of low-cost, compact detectors for security applications that use neutrons to probe the contents of suitcases; devices for research that use neutrons to analyze the molecular structures of materials; machines that cheaply manufacture new synthetic materials and efficiently produce tritium, which is used for numerous applications ranging from medical imaging to watch dials; and a new technique to study various phenomena in cosmology, including the workings of neutron stars and black holes. Taleyarkhan led the research team while he was a full-time scientist at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, and he is now the Arden L. Bement Jr. Professor of Nuclear Engineering at Purdue. The new findings are being reported in a paper that will appear this month in Physical Review E, published by the American Physical Society. The paper was written by Taleyarkhan; postdoctoral fellow J.S Cho at Oak Ridge Associated Universities; Colin West, a retired scientist from Oak Ridge; Richard T. Lahey Jr., the Edward E. Hood Professor of Engineering at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI); R.C. Nigmatulin, a visiting scholar at RPI and president of the Russian Academy of Sciences' Bashkortonstan branch; and Robert C. Block, active professor emeritus in the School of Engineering at RPI and director of RPI's Gaerttner Linear Accelerator Laboratory. The discovery was first reported in March 2002 in Science. Since then the researchers have acquired additional funding from the U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, purchased more precise instruments and equipment to collect more accurate data, and successfully reproduced and improved upon the original experiment, Taleyarkhan said. "A fair amount of very substantial new work was conducted, " Taleyarkhan said. "And also, this time around I made a conscious decision to involve as many individuals as possible – top scientists and physicists from around the world and experts in neutron science – to come to the lab and review our procedures and findings before we even submitted the manuscript to a journal for its own independent peer review." The device is a clear glass canister about the height of two coffee mugs stacked on top of one another. Inside the canister is deuterated acetone. The researchers expose the clear canister of liquid to pulses of neutrons every five ms, causing tiny cavities to form. At the same time, the liquid is bombarded with a specific frequency of ultrasound, which causes the cavities to form into bubbles that are about 60 nm across. The bubbles then expand to about 6 mm, large enough to be seen with the unaided eye. "The process is analogous to stretching a slingshot from Earth to the nearest star, our sun, thereby building up a huge amount of energy when released," Taleyarkhan said. Within nanoseconds these large bubbles contract with tremendous force, returning to roughly their original size, and release flashes of light in a well-known phenomenon known as sonoluminescence. Because the bubbles grow to such a relatively large size before they implode, their contraction causes extreme temperatures and pressures comparable to those found in the interiors of stars. Researches estimate that temperatures inside the imploding bubbles reach 10E7 C and pressures of some 10E14 Pa. At that point, deuterium atoms fuse together, the same way hydrogen atoms fuse in stars, releasing neutrons and energy in the process. The process also releases a type of radiation called gamma rays and a radioactive material called tritium, all of which have been recorded and measured by the team. In future versions of the experiment, the tritium produced might then be used as a fuel to drive energy-producing reactions in which it fuses with deuterium. Whereas conventional nuclear fission reactors produce waste products that take thousands of years to decay, the waste products from fusion plants are short-lived, decaying to non-dangerous levels in a decade or two. The desktop experiment is safe because, although the reactions generate extremely high pressures and temperatures, those extreme conditions exist only in small regions of the liquid in the container – within the collapsing bubbles. One key to the process is the large difference between the original size of the bubbles and their expanded size. Going from 60 nm to 6 mm is about 100,000 times larger, compared to the bubbles usually formed in sonoluminescence, which grow only about 10 times larger before they implode. "This means you've got about a trillion times more energy potentially available for compression of the bubbles than you do with conventional sonoluminescence," Taleyarkhan said. "When the light flashes are emitted, it's getting extremely hot, and if your liquid has deuterium atoms compared to ordinary hydrogen atoms, the conditions are hot enough to produce nuclear fusion." The ultrasound switches on and off about 20,000 times a second as the liquid is being bombarded by neutrons. The researchers compared their results using normal acetone and deuterated acetone, showing no evidence of fusion in the former. Each five-ms pulse of neutrons is followed by a five-ms gap, during which time the bubbles implode, release light and emit a surge of about 1 million neutrons per second. In the first experiments, with the less sophisticated equipment, the team was only able to collect data during a small portion of the five-ms intervals between neutron pulses. The new equipment enabled the researchers to see what was happening over the entire course of the experiment. The data clearly show surges in neutrons emitted in precise timing with the light flashes, meaning the neutron emissions are produced by the collapsing bubbles responsible for the flashes of light, Taleyarkhan said. "We see neutrons being emitted each time the bubble is imploding with sufficient violence," Taleyarkhan said. Fusion of deuterium atoms emits neutrons that fall within a specific energy range of 2.5 MeV or below, which was the level of energy seen in neutrons produced in the experiment. The production of tritium also can only be attributed to fusion, and it was never observed in any of the control experiments in which normal acetone was used, he said. Whereas data from the previous experiment had roughly a one in 100 chance of being attributed to some phenomena other than nuclear fusion, the new, more precise results represent more like a one in a trillion chance of being wrong, Taleyarkhan said. "There is only one way to produce tritium – through nuclear processes," he said. The results also agree with mathematical theory and modeling. Future work will focus on studying ways to scale up the device, which is needed before it could be used in practical applications, and creating portable devices that operate without the need for the expensive equipment now used to bombard the canister with pulses of neutrons. "That takes it to the next level because then it's a standalone generator," Taleyarkhan said. "These will be little nuclear reactors by themselves that are producing neutrons and energy." Such an advance could lead to the development of extremely accurate portable detectors that use neutrons for a wide variety of applications. "If you have a neutron source you can detect virtually anything because neutrons interact with atomic nuclei in such a way that each material shows a clear-cut signature," Taleyarkhan said. The technique also might be used to synthesize materials inexpensively. "For example, carbon is turned into diamond using extreme heat and temperature over many years. You wouldn't have to wait years to convert carbon to diamond. In chemistry, most reactions grow exponentially with temperature. Now we might have a way to synthesize certain chemicals that were otherwise difficult to do economically. Several applications in the field of medicine also appear feasible, such as tumor treatment." Before such a system could be used as a new energy source, however, researchers must reach beyond the "break-even" point, in which more energy is released from the reaction than the amount of energy it takes to drive the reaction. "We are not yet at break-even," Taleyarkhan said. "That would be the ultimate. I don't know if it will ever happen, but we are hopeful that it will and don't see any clear reason why not. In the future we will attempt to scale up this system and see how far we can go." Writer: Emil Venere, (765) 494-4709, venere purdue.edu Sources: Rusi P. Taleyarkhan, (765) 494-0198, rusi purdue.edu James Riordon, (301) 209-3238, riordon aps.org Theresa Bourgeois, RPI director of media relations, (518) 276-2840, bourgt rpi.edu Purdue News Service: (765) 494-2096; purduenews purdue.edu ABSTRACT Additional Evidence of nuclear emissions during acoustic cavitation R.P. Taleyarkhan1, J.S. Cho2, C.D. West3, R. T. Lahey3, Jr., R.I. Nigmatulin4, and R.C. Block3 1: Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, 2:Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830, 3: : Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York 12180, 4Russian Academy of Sciences, 6 Karl Marx Street, Ufa 450000, Russia Time spectra of neutron and sonoluminescence emissions were measured in cavitation experiments with chilled deuterated acetone. Statistically significant neutron and gamma ray emissions were measured with a calibrated liquid-scintillation detector, and sonoluminescence emissions were measured with a photomultiplier tube. The neutron emission energy corresponded to <2.5 MeV and had an emission rate of up to ~4X10E5 n/s. Measurements of tritium production were also performed and these data implied a neutron emission rate due to D-D fusion which agreed with what was measured. In contrast, control experiments using normal acetone did not result in statistically significant tritium activity, or neutron or gamma ray emissions. _________________________________________________________________ One-click access to Hotmail from any Web page – download MSN Toolbar now! http://clk.atdmt.com/AVE/go/onm00200413ave/direct/01/ From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Mar 3 14:02:36 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i23M228s007444; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 14:02:15 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i23M1xjI007423; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 14:01:59 -0800 Resent-Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 14:01:59 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.1.4.030702.0 Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 17:04:31 -0500 Subject: Re: Rover news conf.: goofy scientists From: "Eugene F. Mallove" To: "vortex l eskimo.com" Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20040303162544.19070.qmail web11707.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ultra5.eskimo.com id i23M1d8s007305 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53393 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: On 3/3/04 11:25 AM, "alexander hollins" wrote: > I disagree. What he was saying with that question is > that they don’t know, but HERES how it works on earth. > The thing to remember is that these are SCIENTISTS. > You know, the scientific method. They have tools > beyond the photos we have, and they will not comment > until they are pretty sure. yes, im sure there are > scientists looking at the threads and matchsticks, > looking for signs of life. for all we know, they are > silicon sulfur compounds, therefore NOT life as we > know it, but possibly life. it has to be > investigated. which would you prefer. taking a year > to be certain, or a press conference saying "hey we > found life!" and two months later, "uhhh, nevermind" NEITHER! They should say NOW, "These odd looking things are being investigated for possible connection to life processes. We see threads, we see odd looking "growths," etc. -- which could be ordinary mineral processes, but it is too early to have any convincing proof that these are life forms or life-form related." As to the triangles -- it borders on scientific malfeasance NOT to have already addressed these in a major way. Ditto for the "Dalmatian dunes." - Gene Mallove -- www.infinite-energy.com From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Mar 3 14:13:50 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i23MDa8s013804; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 14:13:38 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i23MDNkH013495; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 14:13:23 -0800 Resent-Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 14:13:23 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.2.20040303141411.0525a6f0 mail.dlsi.net> X-Sender: stevek mail.dlsi.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9 Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 14:17:55 -0800 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Steve Krivit Subject: Re: More on bubble fusion In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53395 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: >"What we are doing, in effect, is producing nuclear emissions in a simple >desktop apparatus" Imagine that. Golly. What next? Perhaps even cold fusion? Thanks for watching the skies Gene! Steve From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Mar 3 14:47:13 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i23Ml48s026972; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 14:47:05 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i23Ml2YN026944; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 14:47:02 -0800 Resent-Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 14:47:02 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-Id: <6.0.1.1.2.20040303173813.01cb6670 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell mindspring.com@pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.1.1 Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 17:46:30 -0500 To: vortex-L eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: RE: Nice try, NYT, but no cigar! Sonofusion vs. "Cold fusion" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53396 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Thanks for the heads up Gene. It is a waste of time writing to these people, and it is difficult to know what to say. I suppose Mr. Chang must be at least partially aware of the facts, since he knows how to use Google. But where does that leave us? What can I say? "Either you are monumentally lazy, or you are a liar." There is no point to saying that. I bit my tongue and wrote the shortest message I could think of to the Editors nytimes.com. - Jed - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Kenneth Chang writes: "To many scientists, however, the phenomenon, nicknamed sonofusion, bears uncomfortable similarities to "cold fusion," which has now been discredited. . . . Sonofusion has already achieved more scientific respectability than cold fusion ever did, with two articles published in major journals." Thousands of peer reviewed papers and scientific articles describing positive cold fusion have been published, some of them in the world's top journals of chemistry and physics, such as the Japanese Journal of Applied Physics. Our web site includes a bibliography of over 3,000 papers on cold fusion, and the full text of 300 papers. See: http://lenr-canr.org/ Sincerely, Jed Rothwell Librarian, LENR-CANR.org 1954 Airport Road Suite 204 Chamblee, GA 30341 770-451-9890 From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Mar 3 14:55:49 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i23MtW8s030923; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 14:55:34 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i23MtMUA030817; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 14:55:22 -0800 Resent-Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 14:55:22 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-Id: <6.0.1.1.2.20040303174749.01cd4d40 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell mindspring.com@pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.1.1 Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 17:49:20 -0500 To: vortex-L eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: Should be: letters nytimes.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53397 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: I wrote: "I bit my tongue and wrote the shortest message I could think of to the Editors nytimes.com" No, I didn't. I wrote to: letters@nytimes.com, and that is the right address. I wish I had an address for this twit Mr. Chang. But he wouldn't listen, anyway. - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Mar 3 16:06:40 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2406L8s028110; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 16:06:26 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2406AFb028033; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 16:06:10 -0800 Resent-Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 16:06:10 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Originating-IP: [67.74.32.74] X-Originating-Email: [mgoldes msn.com] X-Sender: mgoldes msn.com From: "Mark Goldes" To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: RE: Should be sent to the Public Editor Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 16:05:22 -0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Mar 2004 00:05:22.0658 (UTC) FILETIME=[6349F420:01C4017C] Resent-Message-ID: <_bvPKD.A.u1G.uLnRAB ultra5.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53398 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Jed, The Times now has a Public Editor to handle just such material. public nytimes.com Mark >From: Jed Rothwell >Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com >To: vortex-L eskimo.com >Subject: Should be: letters nytimes.com >Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 17:49:20 -0500 > >I wrote: > >"I bit my tongue and wrote the shortest message I could think of to the >Editors nytimes.com" > >No, I didn't. I wrote to: letters@nytimes.com, >and that is the right address. I wish I had an address for this twit Mr. >Chang. But he wouldn't listen, anyway. > >- Jed > > _________________________________________________________________ Find things fast with the new MSN Toolbar – includes FREE pop-up blocking! http://clk.atdmt.com/AVE/go/onm00200414ave/direct/01/ From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Mar 3 18:51:24 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i242pE8s002848; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 18:51:15 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i242oamG002607; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 18:50:36 -0800 Resent-Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 18:50:36 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f From: "explorecraft" To: Subject: RE: Impaled Ball Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 09:48:01 +0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0015_01C401CD.C88B1CA0" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - lester.switchfusion.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - eskimo.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - explorecraft.com Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53399 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0015_01C401CD.C88B1CA0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit And others see this as well: http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/viewthread.php?tid=36134&page=1 nice foto, copy attached Maybe grapes is a bad analogy More closely related to Mistletoe ? examples: http://www.bioimages.org.uk/HTML/T2828.HTM parasitic, and could have had seeds dusted here by impact ejecta. > -----Original Message----- > From: Horace Heffner [mailto:hheffner mtaonline.net] > Sent: Wednesday, 2004 March 03 03:32 > To: vortex-l eskimo.com > Subject: Re: Impaled Ball > > > At 12:09 PM 3/2/4, Terry Blanton wrote: > >Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed > >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > > >This little clip is from the first PanCam image on sol 37 by > >Opportunity. The marble in the center clearly has a stalk extending to > >the "rock". > > > Excellent example! There have been other hints of stems on the berries. > See shadow at lower left > > > >http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/p/035/1P131297854ESF 0500P2598 R1M1.HTML < See possible stem structures in two berries at right of grind photo: >http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/m/035/1M131296470EFF0500P2952 M1M1.JPG< and also in >http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/m/034/1M131212854EFF0500P2959M >2M1.HTML< Seems like the stem material, if it exists, may not melt and/or decay as fast as the overal matrix. Regards, Horace Heffner ------=_NextPart_000_0015_01C401CD.C88B1CA0 Content-Type: image/jpeg; name="ats6323_stems2.jpg" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="ats6323_stems2.jpg" /9j/4AAQSkZJRgABAQEAYABgAAD/2wBDAAMCAgMCAgMDAgMDAwMDBAcFBAQEBAkGBwUHCgkLCwoJ CgoMDREODAwQDAoKDhQPEBESExMTCw4UFhQSFhESExL/2wBDAQMDAwQEBAgFBQgSDAoMEhISEhIS EhISEhISEhISEhISEhISEhISEhISEhISEhISEhISEhISEhISEhISEhISEhL/wAARCADkAP0DASIA AhEBAxEB/8QAHwAAAQUBAQEBAQEAAAAAAAAAAAECAwQFBgcICQoL/8QAtRAAAgEDAwIEAwUFBAQA AAF9AQIDAAQRBRIhMUEGE1FhByJxFDKBkaEII0KxwRVS0fAkM2JyggkKFhcYGRolJicoKSo0NTY3 ODk6Q0RFRkdISUpTVFVWV1hZWmNkZWZnaGlqc3R1dnd4eXqDhIWGh4iJipKTlJWWl5iZmqKjpKWm p6ipqrKztLW2t7i5usLDxMXGx8jJytLT1NXW19jZ2uHi4+Tl5ufo6erx8vP09fb3+Pn6/8QAHwEA AwEBAQEBAQEBAQAAAAAAAAECAwQFBgcICQoL/8QAtREAAgECBAQDBAcFBAQAAQJ3AAECAxEEBSEx BhJBUQdhcRMiMoEIFEKRobHBCSMzUvAVYnLRChYkNOEl8RcYGRomJygpKjU2Nzg5OkNERUZHSElK U1RVVldYWVpjZGVmZ2hpanN0dXZ3eHl6goOEhYaHiImKkpOUlZaXmJmaoqOkpaanqKmqsrO0tba3 uLm6wsPExcbHyMnK0tPU1dbX2Nna4uPk5ebn6Onq8vP09fb3+Pn6/9oADAMBAAIRAxEAPwD09UVw 5HC1Y2BrUKvSmJGHQxoMEdTTo8xYjbkZoAcLNPKfMhXjpioY7ZBbn98evpVwP8zJjg1C6EfIg4oA bEgCgKd5FSySNIvlgbTSQ5t5M7eTUsmZzkDmgColvIhKyPwOlTKrKP3+P9mpDHEcC4++OnNE0JZA ZTnH3aAGq+RlhzUgudnQVBDIckSoeO9SxLnJ60ARyvLI25OAadAsjn962KfnjBbB9KckSyfejLfj QAkkWGwpyPWpFhJjqXy44IxmPGe2aY90IsDZ16UALEDjY4+XsaabWVHzE+FqQzBoxvTn600MrDaV OPrQAyYXCfN/rl9M1LCzOmRGEb0zS2ksdtKS65T0JpZpIJZg6IR+NADJLeQjcygE9s063jmiO7YC PrT5BFcHgkH60wF4TtMnyHtQA+4lb/WbcM/aoFMiczLw3SrrbJYVEZ5WmyShkCTjcR0NAFY20Ui/ N96oFtJxJhDhKuKN0iAdD1qzIoMUSg4LZ3UAZnkK05jlxx3oFksUow25a0xpqtCD5e8+ua3fD3w/ vNejLWcZXHvmgDlFij3SBTt6Yq6mhyrZi4BLKOa6HXvhff6HZG5uQWLdqzdN1r7NpclrcLk4wM0A c/dmWZ1kHyqK0IWDwh0blapSSSyR7NvGTk1LbbIoio4J60AWbnUbmdYlD/ue9QNe/ZXZbVzg/eqO KP5yqnAHekeyVGJD5J60AVmhEaZi5aoUXc+ZOtWEkSMbQMN3Jo3xK26Rd59qAHrbmQr5Yyxrdh8F 6i9r9oWFiuM5xWTa38ccyNGNhU9K9m8NfEOwTSBbXZjY7ccigDxe7sJoyRKNrjqKpKs0bda7Xxjd WOoak504BHY8kGueu7HyEX5tzGgChNYCeJZS3zjrQTuAHULT42WOV0lQ9OOaYqmKQ4QsrdqAGzyh sAYCnjNSizWKPesoJPanS6f9pgUeUyhe1WNP0aC4GSSoTqCaAMx4g3zZ+amiW4jP7o1p6hbwBylr 8oXrWZJdIriJISW/vZoAmVZrnDStgjk0+Y+eB5WCU61r6B4an1dzHCjFm71uTfC6/wBKiaQRN81A HEqskg3ZxmhxJH3rQltzp0rx3cZBB6ZqlJLHk748g9OaAIopGLHzR8vrSSyYb930pJNzoAg2oOop 6wGYAwHaq/eFACR3Ko/PWntdK7ciklt4yVaDlu4pJonjYyNDthb7vNAAsuJD5Z/CrZnGz/aqpbQK SZAOtWIrRyxkxkCgCWK5VIy0i/MKsrl0d1U4jxRa263MZ8zIZu2K29P0W7W3kMjEo47rQBkQXasm AxD/AN2vSPhd4rj02YW9023f6ivPV064tp3McbM4PDYrX02y1B9Wt94259sUAez+LtbtH06aKUq6 hcrXzldPLNfzsIiIwTg161qegahqLJCJTJI+Pkx0/GprvwNBBpZa7jWF4FJmJPX0oA8esdKvNWbb bHqeldVp/wAOrmOzaW7ByBmqmga3pWhX813eTrFAG+XvnFS638b3ui0GhW4e36eZn+lAHM6hGbS8 ktxxsPWs6RWDH95TrzUZNUnedmy0nXjFVVjYZ3ZJoAmlJnQBOG71YijFvBlvmf0ptvEDO0ksuxD0 XHSpFiWSQlJvp8tACxxxz24dlxIeopFgaPlWYfjU0j+Uq4G5+7+tSqWkCleT6YoAhELPtcMQ+eat ywSJBvJ3EVp6T4buNXLCGI7u1aX/AAh+qQqYpYNpP8RagDB0mA6h808eAO9a1vbWsc+9gGVOtbcG jtpenPG8YuJ8HIHH615fceJ9Rk1mXTLHTCCWwziTOKAPQ7fWNMvL5otirHwCazPE0NrBIBoxDbuu KzdJ0MwtL/aM6W4Az8zCtLS10bT5DLcahC5z93cDmgDHttJe7m2uCCe9d34f+Fv9oQiSchFx941W Os6XJfwNawF4znKgHn8avap4tvruBrPSphp8PA5waAPQvBOh6X4fdYdySyJ1b1rf8W3lutizZRVA r5W8XfGdPhjdJb/a3vCnM8oU4TPvXmXxL/bZ0tdKljg1ES/JwRxg0Aew+M9Vs7zVZo4JULqecVz2 4tjByBXxL4U/amutU8bZviVtLiTAcv1FfYnhzX7HVLCG4t3DrIoJwaANwy7zhF4703y3Z8W/3T1p q3JwfIixC38Wc1NbbgCLaQAt2bigB7WMcYzE+JCKRricQRWs2HMec496oXkUsEgEkwGDnaDnFT20 qifzVJEjdSe9AF0R4Zjt2r2FaOiSRvIVlxtqH7TGVIuAHJHUcVHDPFEGRIyXbpz0oA6GHV9PsdQE ToojjOSxNdJf/ELwsbdIW1C2gccEFhXlmreH7qW13yqzh/vAHHFeO/Ez4AWPifTZbvSdVnsL0Ana HY8/nQB9m+FPEWg6mhggnsp0XGJPNUZroNY0/Q1eO6+0WyBFJOJR/jX496j4H+KHgGWSTw9qN9Nb qeJNx+bHtmuV1T47/FaxmFlf6hfKn3WG0mgD9edW/aL8C+DobhNQ1SGO4tP+BV4F8Tf20tG8R276 X4NuZJbq/cKGWM9jXy18M/B7fEnw4ZvElvcyXchB895GGefSvdfBvwk0jw3FGfIje4gGYyRkigDq NJsWuYFfUZGuGkUMV6YzWrZaf9nJaz+Qf3MZqa0kitoMyruUdAKmtL6NyTEu0D+GgB0QJbdOAj91 pzygHCjIpJoVkBnHBP8ADmltHjZD5sZJFAF2axdMLGmV9TxVlYBbRjcgz9auajcMMBVBZepz1qgd +pECJcbevNAGzpuipqduCxCn0qVoLXQiWmAk21W0SOQ3jIrGJYvvD1ryv4xeOvEOn6yum+GrJnwc PIGznNAHtVn8X/Dvh7y5NQnjtjzkNXlfxF/bX8OWmsPY6axuSP8AnmCf5V5zL8Fda+IVxFN4pv5b aNhlkVen5V1Wg/s//D74eXB1K/ngmnjGW818k/gaAMCb9pzxf4kEVr4H0ufy7gkLKw/xFdn8PdG8 Z+H7uTVfF8gdrsZCFRkV1miav4Xm0o3mitbWcbAiJhGDjFchd/FQaLfOb27OrFD+7QR7QKANLxFp s+sKX1qR7e2Y5zuIJqnY/CvSNQuLe40y4nfY2SCzYNV/+Env/HN2l/rVqbPTtw/i6gVh/E79oNfC V+dL8CaebxY0ABXjBx/jQB9N6Vp9rpmnW8RlSEooG0rn9aXxJpPh7TrRrnXQ1wrLn5CR/Kvzw1n9 o74vGZJ5bGY2u7IhGOBn1p/iT9ujxvBpiWTaPNBOF2l2G7+lAHV/tRfHvRdE0SfTPCmnNEr5UyPk lvzr4C1RNb1p5LiaO5jtZWJUbDX07pC+Ivj9rGnv4rtz9kgcsv7oL1Oe1fSK/CXRZYIbV7KCVYkA ICAdqAPzx+G3w+1HxT4jsoJTMkMTj5thGa/STwBpEHhvw/b2duWklWMAk59Kj0D4a6Nob79Oso4W XpxnFdZa2KjJDBT9KAKovdbhi2W8AWIdJdwOfwqrJb6pqBxc3pOf4QuK2GWSOMJFlh61PbFAn76L LUAV9K0WS3iXznZ8epzW5bxxSLtC4I70WMiiLCx/marrqElndfvIgY88jNAFwslsp83/AIDTNKvT He+ZOmVB4zUV/wCINMnIQ22XTtuNNh1eO8xGlsYcdHzmgDpNf1vzLRTZECRhhlx0rjntd7eYyb3J 5G6tie2VYN8kolYjkisyFlZiiKVB96AIDp6XLss8aCHH3NoNcrrHw40LU7ve1hCzZ67RXbNutl8s P8g7YrPLIZjt65oAoad4dttHtTBaQxwQx9AAKthfJmhlCkpLkbqnlhBHzgsp6jNXn1BJLGO1EOFi B2+1AGeqpbE7iHz2qe1tAVM0fb+GofsYWPegw5685qS2mkgB55oAcd8pEh43fw1bWTYoBSoI2W4c M0ux1+98tWVt3mJY3Y2/w/JQBby0rgSMct14rodL8KHYLiJjs6txXT2Oi6RDbFroI8oxkZ6V0NvH AbEx2BWK3KndmgDiJ7dDthsBktwziuV8a6fp3hnTvt9/PG92QSUK5PtV/WvGUWhzaha6PGJJ0I2T Zzk1wJ0HU/FBOo+IFaZy2RlsDH0oA41vi/42vpJYvDOlebaDIjYkLn864KP4V+JviF4lfUfF19PZ KpybcMSD+VfQ6aQts6GKJY2HBAFSX8KRupRAHPUigDh9H8E21lp6WkDOUh4C5NbOm+DbNEaW4tl3 J0JbNbBtWZvvY9sUq2xi5yT+NAGXdWiXNnJBM+2F+EjC4xWTY+CtPhW5nSFBIpHzMMmurMYkKkDD LTWtYpg6oMPJjcc0AYzeG7RwCVic46eWKyNV+HmlahMrXVhA+P8AYArrlikik2M4LL3xRLEznlua AMLTvDtjpCtHp1pHCsePuitNEWGDdbr878Zq9FE6KylMhup9aF+VfKbhPSgChFA9uxWYbu5NPSOJ 87Tg1ellQxeXCvTvVSC2UuRnDGgB1rmP5eo9adJ/rM8AVLJYsibUf5h1NQi3I4lbNAEiMm84fB7i mz+VIMFjn6U+G2VSWjcEn+GnFJWfDAL70AU1sYJcBBiQfxHvVkeZHH5bgbf7wpZoGfhX3ke2KajN jypY9o9c0AIsTRrhHLJSGXaPlXBp6BIXZF5A6GnL+8B3n6UAEaJKu6Y8moytvG/yDJpm1sEbuO1N hhbBOee3FAEsluwbz1PyN0FNLvIPkXGO9WdPnVn8vUBuXt2qOWKRr1hayAQ/3cUAQbmiGZKcgWXn ip3C+WqzLuLfpThY/ZFzu8xW6AdqACPy1ikWOMM79DmordZkTa0Ryp9atrCu1fs42yD+LNO3SoT5 0mWPtQBuaGVn8651G5MMaHJ3H71GteO5dZYWPhwGOFAQ7j+KuYvIX1+ALeyEQZ4iU4x+IqzYtHpk ax28WFWgCpb2CR5MrFnJyxI61prqLOi28bbUX2pjzM8iFVAU9a1Z9MRrUTW7BDj5uM0AZjXBE52/ Mo70jDzpQzLwKktrXKOQ+VFKwYxZiPTrQBHPaeZKZVOFPaoinYc1JHKXlKNyopZJUhkGBQBGYDs4 HJrc0bwi19atMv3gKxpbl9wZDhD2rcs/E1xY24js32AjkYoAwb3T2srpxMDkHmo0gV2DbTir1/eP ezFp5AWPUYpgl8qIheRQBWuHkCfuehqO2hLnM6k1biKS4JXB71s6Npxvb+NWx5GfmGKAMb7G8i5t YSV7HFU5LCRJPmQq1fT3hbwhoMmnnECYQDvXHeP/AAlpkMjPYkW7RkbhjOaAPDjDNDIWfODTHhaZ sg1s+L9RtbHUYraJM5HzVkpdRxpJleT932oAYkAVsI2JBTZDcRt+9O5falEb7dzvyalgjKncxyPe gCMkuoa3yrnrVxLOTyC9y4NNWVJJCCgI+uKWVUJ+U7B9aAKwjUt8vQ1ObEED5sZprKDtVDnB61cP l7FDjLetAGdcqtqQhGfelFwkaj5etXUt0knImf5R0GKberbowC8ge1AFXCzPHldqnoasCzWC4yj5 zUTzI6qjDKr07UkuEYNCCD9aAHNAzSkAZDfpVqO1Fiu0t5pf9KrtdNAgIOGk71PbQG3j8ySTLt0z 2oAt2uiuxDbwAaluLe1tmCyMGbvWbJeyxso87k9aq3U6NKdznNAEghEbFs5PoKu2NjLqUgWNce9Q DytNQC9zGkh/dPjOa2bzxPofg/SY7m9vd9y3KxLGSWoAraho8unHbK1Vlmlt4tsuShqI+Orbxmxk trVoCOmSaniuDPAyyfNs6UAV4v3SSFWwrdBQ9wLa125yznikUG4hLtH8oPAzT4rZbm6VGiwFHHzU ARqmyIFvvnrTUVS+ZDxU/DSMJjlunApjWglbG/APtQBAxaS5ZIhmNelWIwR26Uq20ls37mT5fpU6 xszAIcs3tQBUZI3O58hjU625mjxGcVLPZNGSLjKjs2KLZIQNiuzOehwaAIo4DCpVzl6uaffz2asI 85PStPQfCF1qc2WY7T0OK9I8O/C2BmVryPzsdulAGJ8Pdd1bDK+fLHIBPWugvbyDxHBdXl6yx+UM 4J64/wD1V2unfD+xhYNDALcgYJ3da8z+JXw71mbdY+EFaFZQQXDZ60AeBah4gXxN4v1K5gT/AEaJ gseOnHBq/KOFMgxu6V3vhb9mnV9E04QyzeZOCWmG3rk5rrrn4Q2p0cyX58me3HAx1oA8PbdJGCzY PpViKU+VtHJq7q+mrbXZSJCwBxnpmjSdDu7662QwMB60AVIIXJ+RWZ/QCrMmnzeXuuLeUL64Ne0f C34eBZBNraKyt91SBXoGv+HYbe0dWsY/IA4YY4oA+VBCEhTyQRz0NWZFxECfvVr+Noo9P1lvsxHl 56CsQTi4uP8AZAoAI3m3ZVMj61MTJ1eIH8adAwXDPEWU981LIyv91ti+lAGddoxw+zbmnq37sEir GGY/N+8iHQU2R8nAiKqKAKs0yOCrLyvSq8cskqMJcgDpWjJAjICMAioGDuQG5A6cUAVrYxiSMXB+ b3qxe2cLzkoeCKJLMSYcw7mHfOKQRzj/AJZfrQB6XP4Qs00IXOoXKKkQJKsv3a8rlj03VtX/AOJU ReIjYy3AH50342fEIazqcHhjwzeEi2bFzsH380zw9YQ2EUcJBjjC5Y9yaAOkuNFNjGJLeIF3HzFR UCI1t823Oeord0rxdpttpzW16MKowspGacmoeHrqwZrS9825PONhFAGDJGh3OrFQf4cVb06yiu7w BpCvHp7UlmEv7sxQsI09anvJF0qVhGwnlA4xxQBQuIjZztDDiRVPDZ608WtxIm5QB+NZ1t5105mu oyu49M1pxruwEcqKAI1icELIPm71dtoHt5kdkJApihoRlTwn8WOtbFq99eRR+VBvjPG+gCSaVb0g TSCOIDhdtFnoEl9dKbVisQPL7OKn1Hw7eWW2e4O6Nui11XhvULqex+yGILE4x93+tAHT+GdOt9Nt UYkXBA+8B1rqNO1JruXy7WEx474rkJtQh8BeHZLqTY5HKIz8jJq34U+IMupWC3lxDEkT5xlwuKAO zu7hbOLGoykEegqjavNfTB7WYCEdyK8p+Jvxz07wtEI78wSE/wAXnDivmf4sft5nwFAI9AmilMnQ LIDigD9BJLqC1jy95FE46sxAzWRqOu6Jc2jpd3EMsmP4W61+Q3jX9vrVvEFpc/b9SkSYYMcSH7v4 iuZ0n9vPVLDRNu+WW9U/K5c+tAH6D/Ejxn4b0vxDNBEQLpDzGM1iWvxbvLBGOj2gcgcHivzy039p zXPGXjsajq84C3LLkHHbivtPwjr0er6Nb3EGzLKNzCgD2Twb8bZ1s1uPEeYZcn5fStLWf2l4JbOW B5Q0eMAV5PfxxyWiA7TG3Q5xXOXnh/S7BheXsqBRyQXoA6qPX28V3017GGW2Y/LmtNDGkQZO9cfY +O9CKpa2N5BCDwwBFdDZ3ttdYWykSaMdcNQBuQTHHlnG3HFRSxqZPmztqv58ZQFE5+tTQSPNwV4o AeD5b4gOUHQVI1yZBtZQpNNlgMJDQjax6mkeIvgyc0AMaLHG7JqJtydBmrRtFfmJsH0pg3wna43U AQo5JyzbfbFS/Kf+Wn6UySN95cjg9qFuEA5ioA5XQPBMWhXk93MPtF/KxJdj+VdJbvcMp8+EEd6t rZT3E+2CFtyAbiOcium0/wANfaLRriPKlB86kdaAOUa0+0jEUAMS/wAOasW2ji0jMotAgfuHzXV2 Gi2up2zSQr5KxZ805+9VY6r4f8PaZLea5dottEfkiY45zQBgR6dPHLGYlI3dcVYlsjFcZP8Arcd6 Lb42eFDK8zRRxQp0lD7s/hVfSPHekeOdbKaczuhOFfyyAKALLafczqgbALGvRvCXwqOp2Immycis uDw9FHcLAJxJOmCw9K9a8J6m+l6X5afvto64xigDzTV/CNhoVybfUASrnjg11mj6LYx6OTZsAsYy Rin67bzeIbwyFgqq3yuV6V0FrolpYWio06yyyrhsGgDzN7yfxFq/2a0G6CNsAYr0+w8LCGyiCxhX A54rmLSzsvCOrxTMEHnsSdzYqTx1+0J4U8A25k1/VbaDjhNwOKAOV+K3wk1HxRqttNFqD29pGczJ jgivlv8AbE8dav8ADnwwqeD9Re2t7VcMwGNxr0/4rft9+ArDR5haalHcOFOxFyMn61+Z/wC0V+1N q/xzun0XToGi08uQiqc7ufWgDzbxf8e/FXiqaU6pqE8gc4HzmvPLrU7q+cvdzzSsf7zk16doH7Of ivXrOG5htJFWUZya77Qv2ONfuIwb0lCfUCgD5uWOU4cgt9TUqFpZM4KKPavqeD9i6/Vvmuip7jZm uo0j9i+NrYi5uMtj+5QB8faXK0V4jLIytGcqcV9MfCn4z+MFto9O0eCSeNRgNmtyT9ji8XUPLt5f 3Cnrsr6H+EPwM03wTap58STTADJIoA85Hif4k3dqqmF1jxkDIrzL4j+J/HESGLURcpH3xmvu8aVp NnGsksShh1jx0rF8QW3h7XLcwy6JHO2MZJxQB+bMet6xbzrIbm5jyeM5r6f/AGZ/GWp6jc/Zr+SW RDgbmzXe6l+z1pOu3H2l7FIIGPywg/d/Gu98C/DDTPCEYGnRLCwHXGaAOytrURQqqvkdc1bgDRn5 TxVfyxFjcN3+1mrkUUZj3A4oAkknZ02gZYVDCZWB3qcClUGPDo+VNSvcSLjbgoeoxQBHHKI2Lsp5 qNpTcS/uzjmppZfMARMKn93FQT25jA8gYY0ALceZG5+bPtVcyOx5GKVVdXzNktStdJnDITigDnbb 436t4StvtdzpO6OQkeXkHAFQ6p+2DYQaXLH/AGVJHNIMEAH/AArq7nQbCG1ge5SKYSg/KSKwodE8 NJdu+vRRRxg8fu84oA8h1n9qDxGLOCHwlpc+bgtu4I7+4rl9e0v4hfFe1iXWRLp9nuBIDDnmvpi7 ufA9gUNqIJ1A+QeViuT12/udVv4o9Ik+z2Ib7oTtQAnwz+COk22mwprELTTMB+9aQ/MfpXuvhLwF BpwS204RxRDuEGa5bw1YRw2gurqdZI4VBJJ24rhfid+2T4e+FbG208fbr1AQwQng9qAPf9b8H3Vn ePdaBL5jgDzOa6PwlrVz9mIudsCJ/rSxFfmxff8ABSzWo3mey0+RHcnLZzx+VeXeNv8AgoT4+8Qw yW2jSS2xl4O1aAP1Y+Jfx38D+EdKnj1PVbeLy+oDc18/eIf2+Ph14SsJJdJvftV4gOwZbrX5bajN 8QPipqBmv3vbhrluW3ED8q7zw/8AsleJ9fgjk1CaWPjgEUAejfF3/got4u8e3/keG1e3jDMIypzk V8+eJvFXj34o3uNVlv52Y8DLAV9SfDD9jjS9HmhuPE4E8sXOSMV77o3wo0KwI+yW8O1AMfuxQB+d kXwB8aalBA11b3JjfoSxOK95+Df7KI0yaDUPEWXkQghSnSvr+z0iG0aQ20cYUjAygqzZQhEk3Bef agDG0nw9Fp9rEkSRpGowAFFay2duBmUgD2WiCI5x/CDwKvxuMbWUEUAU7eCAsRFFvTsavWmnxEkm PA+tOhOxyI0wnpU2CeM4B7UARTWkEa7lUEegpIzEFzCpVvenmb7KcKMjtStK90MsBt9OlAECb5JC ZkDA+9SCzid8qoT8M0+O3t+vKt+dW0Hlj5XOP92gBscar8h5A74pJPLQ4UGrMMqEneckd8UFUOSr gH6UAU5La4lXMfCelSRSiFNk3JqTzplGfMBB9qawWX5j971oAdAgkYhThR0FaGnaTe38u2CNmWs+ 3XZKC7ZBNe8fC6308WQeQJvx3oA8Z1fRL7TH3SW7hfXFUA7zEc7TX0Z45n00aRMLsRYVTsPFfMT3 hnvSAcoWbkUAaVycfL95h1NRKYQBvxmomhmi5jcNmohHK3MkW4+u6gComkLJdRGbczjOCXpXtnkE 0d2oCDp3q3LbwSCORpCrr6dqkEUbg5mJP0oA5+LwjZXUpkZCXHfNX4rF4CEWEeWvetMl44+GDA98 Yqo11IuVQcGgDI8S2l1relz6fbzvZwcZZe9eYy/s++Hrm6ea5zdNLyzvnn869lIcQoAQPUYqC48v fGTHh4+hoA8aX9nLwdcRHyrFGU9zkVTh/Ze8HRXPmfYEzn1Ne6KpkYbEGT1I71O9rEpHG1vWgDgv Dvwr0rw9FGunWcSxJ90FRXWJp6IoCxqqgdhWstuZZPLC5x/FUk8AtFw67vagDHMMRHlBM471csrP 7OmAgwR60jRrIu6MbG9KfHHIwxIxI9cUAV57dlkbbwD2qWDTmKHPerCqq8EZAqeC8h2lSMEUAZv2 UQORxkUsb/OMLmrdwqD94TndT7ZE3BscUANLYAyuKR4d65HFTXpZ5v3CDYenNMMjphWiyPrQBXFs WHzHioisqNtQ/LVy4TAB8vav93NV55wAFhjx+NACxl0f/W7R6baurOzLjzv/AB2orON8M0yjafug mprVvnYSRg56c0ACIrFmclj64xSJDG+cnFPJk3OoG3Haq8ZZmZSvzetAETB1fav3B0NW0hjaP5mw ajR1RTDMcOvtUaQqMmWQ47cUAPKhD97I7VoWPi280V1ELsE9jWO+MDYcqOlQMk1wQC3y+mKAN3xT 4vvfE1i9tHIy7MZOa5u1ha0tDE3Lr/F9atpF5KuqnG7rU9rF5iP5x3ButAESQ7QNyFz67sVbUHaM Q8f79RlU2kDPHSlt4tynfGW/GgCMW7gkFc/jSBWVsCP9a6QeHpUw146Rn+LLCtDRvB9pfzKrXSMw PzDNAHJi1aQAs20HtR9iA+6QTWv4v0MaHqTQxnMYxyDWRODAEaLIU9aAG/ZljLMxy47VXCG4kJZc Ad6tt5EspcZViBmnK0XKGbaD/s0ANSzYx74SMYpEEZUmUZYVYiQWy4iYsnr61IscTKSi4Y96AK9r O2f3a4HY02aOVpdznIqx5LlNqttI9qkitmC4d8n6UAULiOI7WPDdxW5FYxT6d+4TMmKbYeH2v5gq wNIXPDdK9W8KeCI9HtA+s2oYMOHL9KAPEntJ7GAtPEwHrVSyEc7sdpFetfEy80HRdPCS3MW5s4AF eLwXzyXTHTpP3JPBxQBrvFExAboKjnk8hlEaErUcLNKQJJQWHU4qy11/yz3gn6UARq4lkDZIB7Yp 3Mk6qMnn0p1vcrFIVkcEj/ZrQttZgtSZHTcV6HFAC3GjXLQ+YFOzHHFZcMYWQh8ZU1s3vjCa8tAs BCq3GMViBGL73/i60APuoEk2sZCvsBRKIVCmOUkjrxSTRtxt+56U1wEAEQxnrQBP5rPtaM5DVYkx FGGBG81WtYstiToOlR3kREoYklRQBYeQmINsBdu9QhJGYCRAAfegnzMFM1K8e5MzAnFACvaxkBBg EUC3RFwCM1VkTYA8JK57VLG+ACwJNABPaDyxg/MajS1aEfMcA1O04aTBQ8VPKhuEGWAoAquqxqMD Oe9TK7qo2YAqCTchWLfuA7Yqw6EBfk7etAHEaVd6zqViknih5GvJfmkwcfyrptHmltpWbT1bc+MZ k9KezNGgCqMrxmm2sSl185D8vTBxQBtazfzXttGL0fvx97nNVBJHNCI261BMUSQKmdp6AnNNhHkT sZoiw7c0ATfZpIDlVBTtzSpGCQ8kWQPemrI12MMCmO1I1y8P7sHrQBcjUXDYRdq+lSeQIz8tRWDm L55myPSrEF7FLd4dPkzQBf0vRZr9xsQkN3r0Pw58L4pysmofKvvXI3/xA0zwjYQPA/71QSyBM151 4z/bk/s3R47TS9FlnvWDDzAxGSOnagD6A8U6loHw0s3uNUuoIrWFcqSRmviP45/t/X8mrNofwzR7 0Fim+PtXmniuf4nfH/UJZ9Qurmz0y6bi2x90fWu/+F37Pej+BYA9/ZiW8flpXO45oA53RfEXxD+I C2P9vxyJGW3Elh0Jr3rRo/sFlFa3K/PtwzCi1023s1WJIVKJ90jir8KJv/d/Jn15oAWOOKL5YWLH 1qQRRA7m61FJGsMp2P8AN61KsQI3SNk0ASAdGSPJPfNOlSbaAVUA+4piTMQFRMqOhzT5IUmH+kls e1AERAQhTjI9KfJcspUY4p1tBD5pWIEhehNTtApJL84oAgW5JcqRwKUvvBKCjaMkg4zSwAI+M8H2 oAFaQxAqDmlQNJxLVh4pN2ISAG5B9Kaba4kUMDjf0/2aAI2byAFUdKnjm3J+8FVsshCyDLnv6VZZ RCgDsJS3THagCpdoSA0f3aEuPLA3Lmp/JdeHf92Oi4p7xRyjCnafWgCJpWkJZU4NIVZ+MkVMvmW6 4ZwyDpxUTMGbOMigCzFc2qQiJoyZ16v61EA8hJDgikTzbj91EAqeuKT7GLYlTGXJ75oAjaAxSlS4 YDvTzEcfLikgSLGShAPTJpTGUBzxnpzQBE5BeNcZdTzVsl5puMDAqtHFMpDKo46tnrUv2eS7OYv3 PZuetADGl2yHYQW74oaIS8n71TwWKRrtRPnHU561GT5U2H4NADvJCRBmb5vSnwkMuAuD6017dS4l Z87u1K6vKyrA+wd+KAKGq2bXBXPzBc5yM1gz+ErKaWGXbEHjJ6xg1188E9uCq/Pnq1UfJYksxwT1 4oApfZTFGq2iogX+IKBVlCpi2zje+OtK8RfhpOKVIvKHyP8ApQBX+zsFyDhT0pWjVFJAyfalbdJM wc5A6GpIpBAhz8/tQBCqK8YYg5NWIYgy/MDikhuhIpPl4NWraR5AQ3A+lAEBtYV+ZXIb+7ilS6ki OFj3j3pZpSjlUHI70RxSTH5zgUAPifzHZyoRj2FLExd2DdKbgQuyr1HenxfcYnrQAhEYkINN3Rq9 MB2/MRknvUsUHm8npQAySSRn2xHCt09qsJNK0ec483t/dxUflqHKsPlqV7QuCVk2g9eKAEjGW3SD Jk4+lI9mNObzC/mBv0pVSRQY4wG/289aiVJYWImAdT1GaAJxLC65yCx7VE4D5wCoppjgiYOkRQnt nNWjcK2Ay8UAMFuJLcAHJpqQGMYxk0nmstyyW0ZIHvVtGfI85PK96AGrlotgwhXvVd7uaI7cbsd6 muFEj4Dbh60iuIwB1oAzLqZl2AHAFQXcztsyxoooAsWztNKEdjtXoBU12ublACQAexoooASe4kiu 2VGIGBxU4USgM/JoooAkWJSMnOadGAe1FFAD5J3EIGeKrqokzuFFFAGfdKEnYLwKdboHPzUUUATy xKI+BUKRKrcfrRRQBcjjXn5RURYjOOKKKAC3bIBOCc0+aRlHHFFFAEcP7zczcmo2c8gGiigBhc+Q tWY2Ig4PaiigBEG6NSScmr8MStEcjNFFAD/s8YgHyj65qlHbxmblc8+poooAluI1WTaoAA7UsigY 4oooAmSQwDfHgN64qD7TJdzBZzkUUUANvFEIxHwKZEdyc0UUAf/Z ------=_NextPart_000_0015_01C401CD.C88B1CA0 Content-Type: image/jpeg; name="Mistletoe01D29B_1gs.jpg" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="Mistletoe01D29B_1gs.jpg" /9j/4AAQSkZJRgABAQEASABIAAD/2wBDAAMCAgMCAgMDAwMEAwMEBQgFBQQEBQoHBwYIDAoMDAsK CwsNDhIQDQ4RDgsLEBYQERMUFRUVDA8XGBYUGBIUFRT/wAALCACWAMgBAREA/8QAHwAAAQUBAQEB AQEAAAAAAAAAAAECAwQFBgcICQoL/8QAtRAAAgEDAwIEAwUFBAQAAAF9AQIDAAQRBRIhMUEGE1Fh ByJxFDKBkaEII0KxwRVS0fAkM2JyggkKFhcYGRolJicoKSo0NTY3ODk6Q0RFRkdISUpTVFVWV1hZ WmNkZWZnaGlqc3R1dnd4eXqDhIWGh4iJipKTlJWWl5iZmqKjpKWmp6ipqrKztLW2t7i5usLDxMXG x8jJytLT1NXW19jZ2uHi4+Tl5ufo6erx8vP09fb3+Pn6/9oACAEBAAA/AKPi7wtdeEIbea+m3R30 AeFoDuVTkDDZA5AOeO+K6C+0W71/U9G0s3dnZeKvDMifZJLhzHBeQZDJzyxfHUDA64r0z4rWcms+ ENSEGGuooSWUdOmWA7+uK+fh4PvLDwLY+KIkcSxXp3cHAAIMbdOmQw6+lfV/hvVLXxV4asdST54J 40mAPVTjJB5PIPB+lcFr9k3w28YnWbdXl0nUSftOFLGNidzAdAOcFck55qj+0d4e07xT4GsC2Z2u 7hGingIIAVGO5Dz1B96+TjoniLwql5dHTLqbTrSQBrlIGIRSNwZj0AOcZPGQR2r0zQPF+t+NfEkW t6nDcalqyhFEt0hwCAFVnxjACjr7V1+laRp3h/WTr2r3a3fiCXIYo4MaZBGFyAcbeOe1auqePI/F /ivSrK0jgbULK2lga73HyCofcFJGcnn8uccVn6JYyWfjbbd+WY5ZS26IkhgUIHXHfio/HHhm/wDD en6XbeH4zehYp7iVZAWY/vBkAKOSAR+AqpZ6gviLw+DYyPaS2vlzXkcjAKJ92Ek7ny8feJ6ZWtn4 7PL4ru/C+qWiCZbqzMBEXzbZA3K8Z7tVjwr4kSa9vLEQXMelz2cX9vBVw1vLkxhh/dXjL7uleYa5 4tj8V/Fm+k07zJdHsITaW0rAHeFxjkcHJyeO2K9/+BE1uvh/VEuDKJjejbsA7xr1/Kr3xMls9VfT fDEVyHu9WukjkjVgSka/M5PccDjivUF0ZdKtlMYLgLt2rzgYrB1S1tJbtJysn2iNGRUONozzz37V 8xeKvhbc6r42vdB0vYGEhuoPMYgFSN2OB25HTtVyy+DNxe+GxquiM9trKsY57SbPkb0Yhs4Xcrd+ T+Vcb4y8V3vilvPvYRDco/kyIAQpZflJGScg7RzW/wDBvw6G8T/2v/x8LCygQx/M64Q4dgBwvPX1 xXrfxY8NQ3Xw+E8rjzLERsikjlTgEDj3H5Vs3NvpWs2VjqMenR3dzNEjQXMcAeReMjDAEgj26Vu+ FdJu7jTB9rhdkZCrG5UlmAHV8jrTtV8HWes+E7zSIrdLW1niKxxxRhUQ8lSBjA5Ga84/Z/1m7Ftq Xhi4BE+myM4ikzu2EnIAPowPb+IV6N4nfT7zQ72z16e3sYmUqGkdUIODhl3dxxXi2i69ca3paWVz Ik+m6QrGJklGTknoHbBwB2xwRXFwaxqvi261bTtKmNrod4BFqF1Lny2jHGyEjKs2CQQeP0ql45+J mmfDbRWttMjk1HU44liM7kO7lehlcEE8Z+nYCvM9F+KVxq1pe3xD31+YmEVqfmAcjAIBOePz613P huK/0C500308SSXR8ue4gY4SQr94E+uCCTXrHhy6g1G5hluNj3Vm5ik2sPvDv6/T616X4ciguvF+ l+ZCrxNb3CZZAQeFznPfkfpXlXgySzi+KM/gi6s1ggma5he4hjAluGyxVGY/8s9o6Y6gdq9e0vw3 o8Hw0tA1pCl1p5djJIgyssbNkk4zyV5rzn4ryy+BdI1LxLpcVvEvie1W0NuwwzO65LqoxnHzc5PJ HrXK6b8PpPAXgvTtM1W0jh1qadb9LmOMjzUkXDRsxAO5CF+XtmvQvhZJqJbV9J021XzppIpGu7hG 8uBMEEgjneew6cH0q54v8DweApNO8Tx3dxqOoWd6gkkvZN7lHIU4wBjr616pdeJBGyCGVHidN2c5 PTvzVGXUYo4pJ5lCKV3FpAAPbmvK/Fet2ekfELw7q8EsT7t0M7QEbcZ9fox6+lZPjf4kP4R1LXrG x3vDqaidWs+WgdlKseDhckA9+teN7Y7/AE6FI0leZGPmSOPlPTBz3OSc/hVnw9q+qeFfE9jd6XcG FpMJKrsQki9NvBGfpX0L8UY5dQ8OWOlhykmpX8FumD82N25iR9Fq78HLsw6FeafcMDcaVctAyDrj JI/njt0r0mG+8oM6BTFnaUbnORUbDCkqyAdVQema+cPidPqfwr+I8XiTT12RalE6tgHaz4AYYGM8 lW6nk1yF9qd3dltS8aanc3Vy6LJZ6Xa3BYjnlLoNynH8K8/SpksrnxRCbe1gTRbW5UPctZqYkii4 +VDz87f7WeCxrRsLeC4urPQNKXyLNWIma3AHlp1YjHG4+p6k1U+MHwN0vxrquhJp7TaXLcF4JWtg sUbEYYNK+07flDjcQSW2jHNeIfGz4RTfAXxzanTbiafRryIT20krZcY4dXKqoyGyeOxFdNpni2Px DpNtEQvnhlbk/NweuM13fwxju5tX8R3u9jbQmFpI3Jzh9w3AexAz7Z9K910fxB9p8Q6YIEtbe5tr eR5IXcIJVOFHlAnJc7QSDXOJ4Ydv2lbfUbaF/JSI3pLL8ylocfNjgHcT3rs7qz1fUvDOuJZtZvY3 dxOwV2dZY1LHcVwCOzH8a8T1rx3aeNfHHhe0vllOg+H0RZFIBV3A5YgkggkKD0OM13nxB8d2vjuy tmtrcRiykVvOlUZkZjgiMgnIA5P/AAGtT4Sap9g1LUAzhWeOIkk4ztLD/wBmqx8Vrm81jQtTghli 8u3VZpmck4wQQq+/f8vWsvWfiZpXw/jUa7vJBVYmtkDBw3APJHIxzUPieTXvEetJDatt0Xyll3xs 22QEZ7cH6Vn/ABI0uK28HRTwxIjW0ySbyMP12kH/AL6/Sub8S63oEN/phk0qW/nvLcSqtnGJCzkj IdQc4GDj3rRl+Gl4qWk8Nxoltbao7vDbpIUnjXOQGQLj7vpnn86bffCe0017qPUNQDWUqp9kvIhg RynnO8jAAxg49TXp3iHRb3VvGXhq/jeAaXpzySyxOW3tIUZVIGMEDPcjvWVpHm6R8X9XjFu0FjrN us8e1dq+amc57c/N69q9CjR153L5Z6gnv7Vx/jfxzH4MsZJpHae8biC1Q5Zj2yMg7c9TXzX4m8Wa l4gubm5125+0sXLRQGRmggHoiscAnjP0FcroM0/jDxbBYW5aTc++V252oOWOef8AJr1/xTrMegWJ srFMTyKEAAwM4xk456Dj3FdJ8KPCVyPB+q6vbpHd6qX2RwsSTng/MMZ7+vaq6fB3xX491yG+8QX8 ml2CcLa6fM8bKw7hSCB7kms79pvw5pd7o+kaZczy3L2SsytvEk2DgBdzAk5xyPpXy3pLf8I5b3Nw I7pZJ5hb2sVyuJQB1O3jjnqO9exaToviC78VXen6HcQwyTRgOLi4MQkwM7e2eCeK7bWLrVLXSLPV LW2e71XT5DBLHbx+cx7EjGSenUHoa5Zvitql7rF1cXGpahpd9Imwm3lMUijkgYJzjJ6GvcfBvxS0 nTvAiOLyOW5s4HaVJXAkkIBJJG7Jz69zXBfDDSdKXRp9c16GPN5O7RrMiiNwM5ADfe+Ynp6Cs/Xv F2n3UKWVnby2UwvvMULGqRvETtxj6AfiK3rDW4NB1q0WUO6Xim3GzGQ/BHUj0NHju71Pw74SmjYT zreSFJpJgxYbhwc+nGOfauY8SeDtQ8X+ArW4uILi5vo5Gm+ZWZjGRgAcE9s/jXpvhrUTZeHNJWaV 45IraNJEkODnGMVF4rnTWNB1C2ngYwvC7KdvQgZBJPoRXl/gXTnuo59VlkVmhZIIQzfMpPJxnp+H qaX4iRa9qmr+HoNKlltoPNdTNEzq67QMYIBAByRXqnh/4Oa94z0SGy8QahcNaxj91HbM2Ubs2WU8 jnt3r0aLfcK2FRRnbgZDAVx3xQ10eG7C31KC3H263crC9xwDjqMjB5z61LZfFTR7jwlBqnnwyGZQ v2eN1aUP/EMbuxrxLx74mm1C7lv7t182RN6ruyFXsq88fSuG0bwL4q+JLyR28KaTp6EObzUVkhV1 yRiNgp3Hjt7V7T8P/g/pvw9gvViinu7122NqN1GMSggYETbRlehxzz+FcvLo11qvjW4gkjJMLfKp B/AfzP4mvUPDl0ngvxbfaYLjytPvbeKdZpThVkUYbngDPP6Vr6n8XNJtBKsF1506A4MDqY847nNf LvxG+IM2t69cahcNJ8z7baFcku3GBjPOBjp7V3/gn4NaXrOkWF54tb7LeQYubVflXe+SVR9wyV45 C88GtC/8CanHrOoXtnpuqSoYAba60+B2Uv8AKM7lX0Leh6Z71Z+H+oSWmo/2dMbgalCgMyXcflvv BO0leuSMZ4rjvFPiPT/EPiOR/Euk2Ns0ErpJPpUYjuGXBC7mf+LI71yT3dpZXz/2d51xp+MbZ2V5 vp8uAfyrtLHUv+El0+ytBdGKzt+EhiwpQbiW2jpmt7xHrXhyfTray0/TpYb6Aqnm38KB9uckggkg /wCJqp4zs5LjTLeeB/JlgPnRsoO4soJAXHc9K9I8QeFde8S+GdEe6u9LbTy8clzJDMUYoCNwbd8p /wARVrxV408J6Q8VvptzNMEGxhEVZCO3Q0/wZa6X4yn+0bh9nXjyyQPmzzuH61m/G24t9E0NbbT5 vMnvD5CojZwuPmIx7cfiK8+8D6Be25mt3Vn2SgIiAkO+OuMc9f0rppfHmheF9Qs7K9ngcSSom5WU hCWx8xJGOeTXvug+Lv7PtkREBBxhkGf615z4N+IVrrdn5N2yW18g5GQqyDnkZOSa5T4t+MdPvHsr S3lW7+zTrO5GGiyB90kH16ivI4YLrWdY+x6TAQN+4/Z02xJuz8zleFGe9d94b8BWqvELqMa/qBXy 5EcCWzhPUdRxwMfN69K9L0/wM19ZmO/1Ca3u0BVYtPYCBVHCj5hk8Y7Co9Y0n4haBaIZo7K7sZnV Q8Bl3QjdkbuuMDvx2+tcz4jvruOCXWbDTmudWZFhlhaImQsThWIHPGepPA56UTfCDxJf2thf6lqb S36vunsUlcW23JwvIyeMZ5HfGa7u0+FPhi30pYFs7Z0bLM8irvLc8kgfh+Ar52+MHwn0HwHrmieI Ptc9zYwu5a2nmVkY5DAhNoB6Y9OBXrPw/wDF+n/E/wAE6NJbQyixEgR0nQeZGyfKT1IGRk5r6U0b UfD0FhFbvGsSImCkcajAxj5e1eGeLNL0zVPGFprWlfZjM6tbTzRsm1iGAVmI9MEZ7AYryz4p/BjU fHF9Zah4dudOhWQFbqNGcPI4OQ42IQeD1NcBpfwelbx1NoJ1S5DWkXnXbIvIO3OAO/JUc471oXnw z1rwldmazlluohISdqNtIz2wOtei+EfhZH8S5LWa++1WC2zgzXFqu18Z4DkgjH16VrfEPQdC0ixm toryW+ntZxHts5EfA6qcAZyc4Nef+J/FGsX9hFBJJc2Fkg2R2y7ooRj29f8A69cvptu9zHMwkLlG Ugbjzz0+teoeH9StvBWh3McssouXhJ2xsN/mt27fdGM+hrhbrXZb3xBYxhbm7V93ktN8ypjrv/u5 Pfvkd62PGviPVdD06zj0qC4bVbt8GS0VsQ54yWHKDnqewNZHhfw1pWh3Cahrkcmt6qQTIskHmWsL 5JBj3gHPTk/h610mneONRttYkuHv7v7Izki2zlFGMAAdue1cKniJ7WUeWzKR0dTgjt1Brr/Bvhi0 8bWbC6N65gwANO2tJIM4JdcHJ68iu707wdbaZIdI0tJbWNVP2mZ1C3DYPAJA65OcEYGTT/hzObS2 1TR7r93qWmXR82QrtM0ZGUcnqxI4zjtXa+H7+O2vGknkzbysfLMnoMfh3/lXZ6hrK3dhKjSjay5I c8AYPJrxPxJ410Gy8R2lvbzsZ5pPs74K7JMDhhzz2GfQe1egX1xP4p05Va9n01YWDrLYShGc7CMP kHKnOfqKq6Tr0lno4t7tYzNGXUuwJLZJ6ZPP/wBevlz4/wB3e+MDrMOnyySWOhwM7mRmP3pMY4yM 5bjp8qH0r0v9lrUorP4WaLG4hEoMwCNjLne2Tjvxj8hXpt/4uv7W5khWKE255DMG3c5464P0ryzx n42TwxBYaMDDDqeoyqZTagLFbhnG8pzkck9c9ya9ysfFPhT4QeGLayb/AIm+sImcqY5HVz13ngqO w/CvG/EfxLl1fWp9Th0Sx0qeRNkl3bW+ySRB0DMTz2rm5Ne1bxPeQaXp8tzdvMwHkhmYMc4zgemf yFe+6T8HviB4d8PR2Ojahp0gnUGdp7iYHewBbAC42jGB1JB6VH4p+BsXgHSZNRhXUNQuYkEsq7BJ O7AAZj+UHOecE1yeupqHh20srLV9LttZtLljJCl3F50luG5IfPCkZ/8Ar1xqeDI9K1htShVI9PUG Zrduhc/cVRjkZPfnANec/EHxPDpHiFIbu72QFcuIGBlDc5JyQBzjqc1z/wAL/H+reNPiBPpsOn2g 0WziaSa7dWefOflVHztAJ7Ec4PeqHibx7qMvxL1S7t9XuLfTIdtrFaRFTG23gsQwPJYnlccAV0Fj 8S1mgaKS6l2EDOZOv1y3Ndd4f8W2L20cMkNtOM5Mjqpk6565ryNdc2lQXyp4PNelfBPxP/ZPiUsL to0MZP8ArOGwfunnueMVteOfi3quia5cx2xjjvbkrKxnQrNtwBzznn3Fb2keMI5detdbvmW3ivbC NLyOM7S56ggE84+Ycnpitibxdo2vaxp1qmox2WnQnLSXMqoBjLHnOOcAflS/E34hxadp9tZ2Vwby 6uGIH2R9/mhsBU4bnOTwPavJ9E1yTwZ4hu9Q1yyt729VTHBbyjebdweuD93gkZ6+nevQ4fFGreI/ h6+o6U7RX0TFpIIASHAJ+UDknjpXB2fxz8Q6W4huIIL5f4vtUbBvccMOa2bfX/BviPwj4qW18601 XVgvmWsgjGWwANgHJUbSfYsfWuE0mS/huNL0Xww909whKQpAx3KScszbOg55P1r2a4tdQ8GaLGNR u7vXdcCmSZSxkjRlBO2NcAnjJOfQVh6zr+l6p4f0ma60WKXXEiE0jXVuC0JKkENnnrzg+xrlrzxQ 6SO9xN9okucb3dyXB9eTx360/Tk1LxPdpZ20byu7AARhvKUf3m9Bzya+hPg/8O9N8FQpd3Mi3Ops QZJpCrbSeqoSAQvH48Zr38a+1taFkBkUJ0QZz+Vcfrnj+61fwnqF9fI1nKqPHCs2ULcfIeeuSe1f Jg+JWo6Zq0Wl+J5N8zxh0uUlLDBJGdzHg5HTFddqmppcqCxLQq4mZY1wCzYCKB6AfqTWD4y+Heke ONCu4ZLaGK/gHmxXkSqpdzn5WbByhJ6V558HvDR8KeGdU1GWA2t5fSMojVNrLtyqgAgHruOK5fwl 4E0bxHEtvO9/aXSzuLlrlwk6knPIKnBGO4711h/Z78L29+saa9rXlom6Ytdw4GThR/q+v1q1qfwE 1PTEim0HXYpkzkrfyMu1e2CinJ/AVP8AED4DaX4KtFvv7WuDFLxFCxVpM49MCuK8NX66BqloLJYz LNcRq0tyu7au8FjxjHTNe1aDoo1rxX4j1XVtM07W4bW5WzFxPB50gCjJILAgfe557VyfinWraXxJ fNp1nbNaQ5jgtpYwYsAELwO30rnZtJ0/xnazzWMd5ZRrEy+XZEb0lBXIkBz8vLYxjOD0wRSaPY6v ps+mzXV7pflWhLI8tzvlDrwCFGSOgNV7rRW1HUnubrU7e8uZjubHmyMx/wC+Mk17t4E1Dw14M8NR xXLX1nBKSjNfxJFMzsMgoGxxw3X2rl7yCPxdqF++l6Z4WfTQzLFNNbt5zkDgsyep7/WvKdd8GS6V qUm4nTtVLGWBrViLVgOSEYjcGHAHJ5POK9A+CrX2n20etT2Gl2asTZvcSo8d4hDc7lxtz0HrxXb6 nrym4ur23VrmVBLArXS8q2Rufr/dyM+pxXkHiXxHcXFy1nFG7XTsfOkVc7+nfOSOOayxoV3NBPLF azXWwbiVBP3ecdOp54r0X4R6895YyW+nfY7bVF3FhdAgTITkdDkleeOmK9KHi+68O6fJPrkaBFbE bWQL7vXgnJPPb3rT0v4siEPJDdyzQrGX2zZ2r6DrxnsK0/F1pd+MPBlzcpdyjULcC5itYmIjYqMl dvJORkAeuK8dl1XQZ7NG1DSLS7a7IjF21ujSRnqMsewwfxNLqUx8LX6z2ly2o6XMBvjkYPLGTnOA MDZgcH3/ABrqdKvLKaxluE2GEKZDnHIAz/SuM1i7Fv5FuqruT9+6oPcn+ea8wfVblvGD61LDHFBe ybJo1UgA4wrMPUgYJPoK9outLs28Lz30aIvmqsj8jjHUDHpWrZhLiO1aPz2jMIUhxxyODXnfxg16 bWjbbvMSKLKqJFK+nP8AOue+D+jR6n4yivL6z+0aZYxvJMHjDRlipVQcjB5Ofwr0dPEMehfDjVL5 JhDcX+ozyeUOGLMSB3HAXB79q8iguiWZix3NySW5q0NQniU21mv2S1I/em2yDPyWO8j7x64HYCrP h/QZdSvIrS333M0jHceqRr0yxA4r6E+G3w+0Dw3YJcXMaXuotsYyyqr+U45/d5AwPfrUP7QXhPS/ EfgTW5raWSC4tbRri2uFIVkdRuHOOOhXjsxr5j+CvxE8a+ITcaVpXhaO7khlWOS6EcoiRscmQ8hc 8nk8k9Oa9Z1u2b+x7uDxLpzWurbZGjuPKxbjaMhY3bucDOOvHtXQ/Ceys/FuhXmk3pMF1G6XTsSF Z1wGD8564GTjvmsPxXrUDzTRWTKiSk/KTgAAnkAHv3NcdY+H5v7Qs5blXjjlm8sXWD5YbHQse5HQ fSvdbHQrDTdHght7aORcb3dkBYnH3mI6n3rynxt4RbwX4mtdb0d0t7K4bfsQ7RE/cYAACkHjn1rq dR1j+37G3laMJDGgYq4+VnPXHqPSuA8d6yNI0s2kLrHdNIhaPdtZvmHUdcDr9a9Y8AeOp73R3LOr yx7VIVvmYY+91rzfxVpjaTq95abT9ikbz4vLGQik5wvYYORj0xXpuneHNO0vSdOk+zw3kpT55yN+ 8Y6rnt7+9cXrGqW/g/VInDxLp187KbXcMRn0A4AXnpUepaMW1ZtUtm8+ynhWPAbcYyCfQYAweKxN E8HRalq9/p10YyjwfeUjKZAwwyOMEg/hV3w5dahqGjyeHJsLeGf7POwJzGFJ3474IHGRzmvTLZY4 IBGiukcQCrkclR61UuvCmkaksJurVbsTKQVKgj1G3itHwvpml6bp4W006NInVopIliHJXIy/qele KfFXUrSzubXTLQMsMJZ2G7IZyecnPP8A9auGtrhL2+EUfIxztOOfSt4w+Tbln+XaC0iqTycHG38+ /rXVfDnxBaeGrPUrjUUCvJt2FQN7ZBwvP0/nWlJ8eovD9y0GoWUkglI+zxWS7pDngAqWHPpiud+J ninxf8RtBnOl2tz4d0CMCKddTV7aa4JI4CgtuX9Ote5fs7/Do+Evh/ZRraCG6uCZ7uQR7XmckkEn AJwCACewq38d4beHwJfvJaxrcx7XiG0feDDIX3IyMd814loWs32lait0kc9tvtXtmZo2j3gJkfXA wPpXQaLoo1zUmWG3ie42hYBKp2qO5OATgZr03xfDoOneEY9Jm+y21tHylw+1ZDKfuvk/xZ4HfHFY vhjXWks7i2n2N5TGEuvPI9/QjH41R8U6N/atrNFcrm2MRCgf+OkZHUGsG5vLbSRYWkgDQKcGJSN7 bRnocdeP1ry3xva6n4zWa+0/RZReW7vMboQlY2jXBZGbu4AJAz1zXTfBzXVv9StQybVkzEwUYA4w M8+uK9G8caLGNFt7iVNlxA/znHVTwR+HB/A0zwh4ltbfR57W+mC/YwyxvIwA8sglep9cj8BXHePt ItfFmjpqmJLC3W5ijzOnlKqFgCSSMA561u3NxB4Yu1dHWXRrxyqKxyEY84HbbjkfQ+lOtdHMXidp 4m3W15FsSRewAHB4xng1l+JdNm8HeMrHV42xb6iMS5J+WVRxk8DlePwrvreUXUUNxG4ZZFJZW9O2 BUHg3Tb2900zi9T7NYnyUSZiLjIX+Icj2HPOa5fxD8Qh4Tj1W2ZilxJdAR84K7kGT1HT+tfP3iLW H1mOe7kd2Mk3kwEMc8cu3X3UD8as+DbZluYlKlJWP3+4+hrupbRLiRkDYUkhcHjHr6Y4/lS6tpN5 qMdtZ6XAklwVB3yqQiEA/MxHQdfxPvXtnwl+FPhTw7pw1vWguueIH2N5l6scsdrIpJ/chhlee5ye B0rjfib4ptdR1nTg9u1hYSXURuEmUJGQWBJ646HnPoa+kvA/iOFNIhN5FbLcR9UiH7sgHjqc9K53 4nW9j4y099NkQeVcSjCgAkDqex7d/UivFPiL4Fi8FQWfkXd3Iku4qkzA7cKPu4A6g4/CvSPhPoeh +H9JMzyXd7cXK/PPMUd0G3hVPGBnqK8z/aPR57G2kgDgpKsgVegIDZ/Gt34I3tjqM3iGS7RZB9oQ IjgMozGueD0P+Fbvitbe0vnjt5zJaIDJiQj5Sc4XjjA4/SvGdQ0zVvFF5dapaZ8myz5QO7MzD7wQ AHPQj6gCu38BeLRcaKLIRrk7jgDqSSSDzyc/1rltW0p/BGtzNp62Udreg3MfljmNlI3KuAMdiMet eoOF8U6IplbFrIocSHvkYI7ivFfGGlXK30UNrMry2V0ocM2VcKeM8ckdfavTdb8LLrfg+/0aWVhF MuflPRs7genqBXlB1C507wDZ6PqjPJqNhqRDbiTiJeAeecYfg46Yr0PwvrEmjywwXDtJZyH9zO5y On3STxn29K3PGtinijRLuyVV+0iISW5A5Ei8qV68Hocdiaz/AALqv27w5A2QLtPk2ScbR3GOoIrR i1lfC19e2kZkljvER1O3J3g846c4xXz18c/FP2jxPcQhTE0YAIxht2Bknnr0FYUWnl7fTYQGCxW6 MQBzufMhP/jwH4Ct/S1ktZYGXEZZggPTGe/4c/kK6xbi3E6xsxRQcYXHQVftNT1EatGNHsxdPIvl u0qtsUA8cjp+PpWzr2s6npt1pLPd/ZpPn8+3hlISRmGFGOM8+tWvGOjv4osTNrMERm5YC0BEcfTa FyeegH0Jrv8Awz4tsB4egWOYtPHGsZV2G4EDHzDOQau2et+Tfm7kYSRqRsM3K/T9K4j4seJo9bub G0WYytbqxbachd3Y/kf0ru/hDY6Pq/hm5S+vr63u4pHXFvIgABG5Tgg+pH4V4x8T76SXx5PayT3N zo8MrbWEm7huwByOpxU/wgW3n0nU7pr+5tGnv3ZBE4VdgwATx9f0rsNalf7GqEndcMWYsTuA/wD1 YFW4GighDQQx21oY1AiChdh6nA7c/rXB+IrV/COsxajagx2V3yVXhY5O/oAD1+pNQfEHW4dR0jSr m3SNZFEisqjlThcg+3y5H1qbwH8TGXwNcCba0dnyAeTg5Pr68Vyvw3vbjxD4nliuC0zTzNcOXy3H VuufpXvcCnEu5S/uOR1H+JrjvFfhK21Cw1W4WDNzLaOgbZzlQSp6dc7R+Aqj4dih1vwzBbysVRkV lZMbkYcbh6Hn8q1/D2pyRzNpeofJqEAxHMp4dCOqk8kf4VhoP+EV8ZS2sgdLK/H2yAsuOckOPT73 PHYiuf8AGOp6o2o2kFlfMfJTzJ7xmOB83IUj2BABrynxP4dvPGfi6W+E6/ZH5kklJ3M2O3GCM/1r p100xTshbcwjjUEd8KAOMVbPh6a/hhjgc+Z5mdqZ3KuOeMdeeK6jTPhy17NG9xc3FvHtKuHfEnA6 8jviuzm1TRfCnhwz/uFkiGxI0K+Yx9WHUn/GvLvF91eana2eqyW15A8l5tDSRskR6EBc9TgjPpwK 9S8BeCda8S2b31895HbWzbFgkcgZXr8pGcg/yq5r/hpLZ4NQ01IRexna9ufuXB/2wBktjoa5bxh4 nOu2cGn6abi1uH3T3CL8hgCA5GAfl/H2rkNGmTT7Oa6vp5py7ECR2y8jDHGT16jPsRXc+EdTmKyx 2l1PCswyvkNtLgHIz/wEmovFltNb6HqO22j2ybSJ5l/egghsZ9OKx/A1ugn03RLUlktY/tN7KuOp +7HkfXJB9K9DmgnupJ7tUR40/dxCTOwkHnPtk/pVkWEYWbJmff8AvAn91BjoPqTVLxBo41XSVsik RgniJJcfNG2eCDjg9CK8euLSeyvX02/yJYiCuc7XB7jPXNYGq2r+HbvWNIh3pAk4ChuN0R+dD7/L j2r0H4JaXFaLe6m6rwBbxsfX7z8/98ivXk1CAEDKgfKDg9ec/j/9YVWvH+1xNFCwUFDktx1PNefe AFFvcXGmTllW2nlhyfvYUnHX8KrapcXU2rDy1eKSElkmfK4UDoT/AHT/ADxUniyebxN4bs7+0Utf abKWZMfvdhBDrgc+hx/s1y2iT2/jDWTp4uUit4gAR5mJJz7dcjrn8K1dU8DWuh+V5N6/lAfMkhAK j24FcydRTVLrVLvT4Glh0/YkpiXJBIO0jGf7pzn0Fd94Kslh8ODVnaOe6nmIH2f5zH6AHsQOvpXT WqtqlyySuwmSLkDhDz+ZOK5zVNEi1vWEjggxDF87I8YUbs46c5HfPtUXxMla/wDD2i6PD5S3EMsi pGuQJHZh8y4zngDmvSfhRLqHhLSLm21m/wDt1zOwfckzOqggZGWwffp1qfVEjubnMO2JZZCykHgY 7j0PpXkWsWkmgSa3rq3drKv7y1ZZHySGLKT0HP3T1rl/Ddy3iDS9X06S3JuIGW5tCiEgkDEik+pX BAHpz0rrPhhew2PiHTYrlgYTdIhJxgK/y8544z+leufFXQLGS0szYobiaWURtZRLlH5OThRk8D8j Xl2k6LJ4Lt9QY5+33VyWIBy3oEz14JNdlFO1tCbASgL5e0sT35Jb65JrV8MamjoRdCOVxGYyxGef TnsSBV62toHjuNy+YjphQFyVZRz9K8x+LWkQzadaanZruu4pCnl4+crgsRgcnBGR9T614t42197y 6svKXfcSRKhK8s2CQvfJOMD6ACvVvDyr4e0u301ZSRCoMjbsh3PzMT0zz09gK2IvESpAGADM2X+f 26d/rWh4d1KHWprhby8ezWOEv5sbgEnsOc/5Fd94E8M295YtdzWFu9w7F2mWIMznpu3Eck1P4p8E 6fHNFfNHHtTiSEKMOD0yMcj/AOtXl+ulfDviIXcSqthO/lSoo4DY644HNeAeAbBtT16KAXlxYSBG ZLm3OGUgZ6+h6V3HirU9Q1a6i0fTpWvb5wFeZ87UHdnI+6KeNFg+HHgS9gJ+2XN7Isl5KQGMjnA2 r0yo5wD6k96r/BPxJcXninV9McpFa3EH2iO3hZvKjkUgFlBPBZTk47gV3h8Vy6BqssF2Mxnguo+c jsRkitaxuhJYDURLESRwqMMMM85A71y7/wDE9+J1jHvItrCFrggHpnp+rV6HPIyhoGGR/e/iA+te i+CYNJksZJJkjmmDceYqsU7DHpnrXif7R/g59Y8S6TpugGGzsrpZHvzEDHEiAr82FGN7ZOM9Svsa 4bUbN/hpq1gtjdSTWRRHfzG3Ox27W34wCSO9WC5stRn8tGgAYSxCRdrAZyOPau28EfFG71fxdf3k 0Pmw2cO2D5SYxK3r83Xjt2zVm1WPWteaO4lcxQJuJQ5ZpGyAfw5P1ArW+zRw6pexz52BtoO78z+l XtN04WjXLpulhcZRtuduCD6VbtLpuJB+7DNu2jgZI6GuS8cs17eWqxJthjLuxAxlsYwffrXlfjLw rBZfEq2u47cQacbcXUe1cR78kbV4xjdzj0q7HqQWPc5yX4wO9Nu9WwdqttydikH8T+Favh+zbXdP aWG4ZLi1uklZUcqrovVGxnK4PT1FfQuha+BoohtWQI2074j6ehBrL8S6wIbGRWlLyyfKADk15tr+ nXd9ps9rMoaSVPkkBJAfqDn6gZrzfR0GgeGLKNrGFNXlVo1MceJSCxxuPXp/Kug8M6YmmQO52vcy Y86c9Xb0B6lQc4/+vXP/ABd1BU0a2hyR5kxJC9woP9SK574LOkPjjzWkRMW7j942FPK8ZrvPH99D eTIluBLcofmdeVxjpkdcVxQvNUsmhlb7T5AIYFt4jIB6eld78MZP7T1fX9WlXGDFbgKOBwSR+grr V1Ca5v7rTMuZQykSHJbyyc9fXpVPxH45vPD00VnpAll1Ob/lgAWJXsxCnOB1z2GasxaTq+pWAn1C 6M0zSBmkkY7u5wOPujJwP/r1yWt2MF5oGoC4dfNkkH2eaU/dCcDk9j83T2rMbUrnW7SK4CiS2tEF obs/ekYKOCcnPA/WtL4fRyado16R5UiPcNOzHO8EDAUn0wc4rs/DKMth5yxbbm5m3CUryB/CAc+n P41sySy/2i/2q3Xe6fMGQ4JB61B4gu9QttDvF0gyu0o2q8WSYwc56dCKztP1WbQ/DMEl5NJPKsaf NKSxdsnkk9T2z9KwdO1bxT4n8RR2unWkFxbpL5lxHOrHyyQe3QHr19KzPipqsy60NNuFtkktRho7 Qny0YgZAz39R2NcQL9QBgq4HCgHJB/yalsLC51++SCFWCRjMkhBwAfcZ5PSvRvDOj3Gnx3N3bRuU QfvEUHle5x+v0Br1HwhodrqXht54J3t/JcpJHDIVxnkNgdAQevqD6Vzlnp80usTabNcPNHE4czO5 Lsvbk/hmvQl8HxanaykQgbELHYOVHc9K+X7W5XUdXnumYFYf3UYB4DH7x/AED/gRreN6tugAGSuB x1J9a84+LOoG5uNNi3DCByQp9cD+lYPgti+tOInKsYmwFPXHP9K7jS9btob0LqAIhZiDIAM/jntX srSWUXhmW4ay0yWwMZ8hLhFKnrjb2yfauC+G+rQ6PNqGl3kYsftUwmi+1jyzISOcZ69OPrXR6zdr oerDWZGWOGK2fzDuwrENhVz3PI4pvw+0ae/vbrxFcpu1O9GIhcLxFEckBQRkZA9egFX/ABR4ktvD 2nyyyzMGeHFuoYZLHjpn69K5Xw3YLq7xNf3Ns0wGYrGSX5QgAPzrz83J4rDtYF01Nb0leq3AkiRe nccD3BXtXQ2+mvpGh21iz+XPcFQ7Zxgk8n8P6V2Wm3cIt40Vz+4UlRERjj5ef6Vv27td+XdOF82N QDuH3s1nXeqR6RFJ5bssQO9wWwWHofXvWJ4c2eJdTa+v8ppUR2W1r0SQjuynggdeO49qv6n460r4 eajfX0McQvLlVxGgXLsAQCwBBIr5/wBR1mbV7+4uZZHlnnYyPISSeeSayk1RIbuO3iJklJ/iwVU/ 413/AIU1pYNOaEvHDKY/M8wj5pSGOQTnrjOP/r16N4J8TwRErLJH5TqQxJG0jHQ1u6Nd/wBgXV3B E7m3YZVVPDx9VPvjp9c1zGh+L/tnii+uHVolimaAoeCFXIyefUZr0y28XSRpItvcFZHQoRvxgHqD g9DXy/HDL4ev7jSpHE09vIRNKOhk/iwe4z0zzgCtL7fshLOCXHJK+9cj4p0g6tbi/aQp5cnk7Qe+ Mg9Pr+lUfhxYzN4ytIkkCl1l+YEjK7CCD9RxXZeJvCk1rFJcFodrZIRc4GfbFX/A5vPEdrDBdyiT T9LU7LdmJEjsTjeDwVGePoK9C1KTQ9OvLa51zT/7RVSJIgI1YgjgDJxgZHavP/if4ybxP4lsdNSz t7TTxOg8qKPZvUkE7sEgmtDW/HeryQx29jIlhCMojQZSTAJ4JB/lXGXWqzXl4kl/NNdwRMYolkcu Qw7nJx1PFavw8WTVfGFvHFtGxizCQkAgduM16NbeDHj8U3t3cGFlj2/IuTk4HJyKyvHNwY9UtUUk bSG46dK6TSbNNItroAB98QJYjnlsiuhu5DAkMSEqXhUgj8q4nxxqYj1C2sSv7s8u4HzMucY/nV7R 76O3gjjMQaBZGgjG0ZGeh9iM9q8x+INiuoaoLhZZROXaJwxBUbAv3fTOa56zgWG4tlIzuBDY9OnH +fSsI6Y0epyjftZZDyhxXo8Ph6Gx03Q7qMl/tDNbzhz/ABHLKV49Dzn0FafhuAW11LaSAMpzyBn1 6/hW9pfiC4i8QHTpz5ogIRH5J2MMgde2D+Zrn9fd/C3inUipDrct56r1A3DOD075rsfD1zPpmj3F /IsUqXJRUzkumBjgnoMk1//Z ------=_NextPart_000_0015_01C401CD.C88B1CA0-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Mar 3 21:32:12 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i245W88s025671; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 21:32:09 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i245W5Oc025640; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 21:32:05 -0800 Resent-Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 21:32:05 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: rick+highsurf.com mail.highsurf.com Message-Id: Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 19:31:48 -1000 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Rick Monteverde Subject: Easy Photoshop Mars color fix Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ultra5.eskimo.com id i245Vn8s025544 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53400 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: After compositing a filter image set by "applying image" to the three color channels, I create a new layer (not channel - layer - go to layers palette) above the background layer, and set the foreground color to (HSV) 32,87,100 - a nice bright orange. Then I fill the new layer with this color at 30% opacity. Voila - close to the NASA images. If you try this, watch the sky as you do the fill, or click the eye beside the orange layer to toggle back and forth after you've filled it. The sky comes up about like the NASA color press images, the berries at Meridiani or the lavas at Gusev go grey, or slightly bluish-grey. I also tried it on the color disc images with 4-5-6 filters, and the orange wash makes the gold frame and the sky reflectors look right too, with the white area a light orangish cream color, similar to the sky images. I assume it would pick up that tone form the sky light. That lava might want to be slightly bluish. Rocks very similar to the described composition are common here (Hawaii), and some are a bit bluish. It's usually the denser volcanic dyke material that gets the bluish tone. - Rick From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Mar 4 01:09:12 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i249988s006270; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 01:09:08 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i24996Sr006244; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 01:09:06 -0800 Resent-Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 01:09:06 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <002801c401c8$ad0e50a0$c864a8c0 win98> From: To: Subject: Taleyarkhan wins! Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 10:59:54 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53401 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Finally sonofusion in mainstream! http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2004/03/040303080222.htm "Evidence Bubbles Over To Support Tabletop Nuclear Fusion Device" http://news.uns.purdue.edu/html4ever/2004/0400302.Taleyarkhan.fusion.html Regards, hamdi ucar From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Mar 4 02:34:35 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i24AYW8s002429; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 02:34:32 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i24AYUdu002410; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 02:34:30 -0800 Resent-Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 02:34:30 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <001001c401d4$4a5e8720$6401a8c0 Craig> From: "SnowDog" To: References: <002801c401c8$ad0e50a0$c864a8c0 win98> Subject: More Information on the PanCam Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 04:34:06 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53402 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: I found more information on the PanCam. 1) Exposure times on the PanCam have been optimized for good color through filters in the visual range. 2) The PanCam enhances each and every image for a maximum signal/noise ratio. With images taken with the rover in the foreground, there is inevitably something bright and shiny, or white, in the image which prevents much modification by the PanCam, before transmission. Therefore, pictures of the rover, and the color wheel come out looking good, with no modification. When the PanCam images something in the environment, the picture is typically dark, and images in the blue filter are the darkest, so these images are enhanced the most. Therefore things come out with a strong blue bias. So the color balance is being seriously altered by the PanCam before transmission by the rover. Why? I don't know since the images are compressed before transmission these days. What I need now is to learn how to find out how to determine the calibration factor on the images. There is no correlation that can be applied from one image to another as one might expect. The color wheel is useless without knowing the calibration factor for each image. Also, images are being calibrated for white light these days. Mars still looks quite red, but there is more evidence now that the images modified by the Viking team were modified to be way too red, and may have even have had blue skies in some of them. New studies include information from the Pathfinder solar cells which indicate no loss of power that would be expected if the sky were tainted red. Also, the Hubble has done some work imaging Mars and the evidence indicates a minimal reddish tint to the atmosphere. Craig Haynie From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Mar 4 05:53:20 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i24DrH8s010367; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 05:53:17 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i24DrElA010342; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 05:53:14 -0800 Resent-Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 05:53:14 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 04:58:26 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: RE: Impaled Ball Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53403 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 9:48 AM 3/4/4, explorecraft wrote: >And others see this as well: > >http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/viewthread.php?tid=36134&page=1 > >nice foto, copy attached > >Maybe grapes is a bad analogy > >More closely related to Mistletoe ? Mistletoe is a fairly highly evolved plant. It requires a host to get its nutrient. Lichen, on the other hand is a symbiotic species, a mixture of fungus plus one celled photosynthesisers or nitrogen fixers that the fungus "farms". The fungus provides a protective fibrous matrix, the one celled food producers provide the nutrients. It is self-suffient. It is also so low on the evolutionary scale that it might have evolved on Mars itself. It is also possible that fungal spores and bacteria came from earth and then completed the final evolutionary step of combining into a single symbiotic lichen-like species on Mars. > >examples: >http://www.bioimages.org.uk/HTML/T2828.HTM > >parasitic, > and could have had seeds dusted here by > impact ejecta. The Mistletoe fruit is certainly very similar to various lichen fruiting bodies. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Mar 4 07:23:01 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i24FMp8s018091; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 07:22:52 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i24FMmHG018061; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 07:22:48 -0800 Resent-Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 07:22:48 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <001101c401fc$77e37c00$8837fea9 cpq> From: "Jones Beene" To: "vortex" Cc: "Frederick Sparber" References: <001001c401be$13b59da0$3ad1b141 computer> Subject: Worm sound Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 07:22:11 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ultra5.eskimo.com id i24FMa8s017969 Resent-Message-ID: <67LQFC.A.FaE.In0RAB ultra5.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53404 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Horace's lichen and an earlier message from Fred Sparber raised a thought about other potential evidence which could be available for life on Mars. Say there is lots of lichen-like plant material there. Say this stuff serves as the food source for higher forms of life. Say that the more mobile life-form burrows underground where sonic forms of communication are possible (the Mars' atmosphere is less than 1% as dense as ours, so sound doesn't travel very well.)... anyway, you see where I am going with this... The original Mars Microphone instrument was lost in December 1999 when contact with the Mars Polar Lander was never regained after its scheduled touchdown. From goggling the net, it doesn't seem like the Rover has one available. Thus, there is apparently no sound data available from the Martian surface... has anyone seen sound data from Rover? Anyway, a new version of the Mars Microphone is scheduled to fly on the French NetLander mission in 2007. Check the current status of the Mars Microphone at this site. http://sprg.ssl.berkeley.edu/marsmic/sound.html Frederick Sparber writes, > "Pinkie-size marine crustaceans whose snappy noisemaking has already captivated scientists also stage some flashy pyrotechnics, researchers now find. While earlier experiments had shown that so-called snapping shrimp generate imploding air bubbles that make loud popping sounds, a new study reveals that those collapsing bubbles emit flashes of light and may flare as hot as the sun's surface." -Science News Online, Oct. 6, 2001 From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Mar 4 07:54:53 2004 Received: from ultra1.eskimo.com (IDENT:smmsp ultra1.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra1.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i24FqYFp005093; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 07:54:51 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra1.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i23MBrFp011269; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 14:11:53 -0800 Resent-Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 14:11:53 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra1.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <004001c4016c$8544a260$af7dfea9 rebradyboxx> From: "rebrady" To: References: <20040303160434.16858.qmail web11703.mail.yahoo.com> Subject: Re: odd triangle circle image times two Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 14:11:15 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53394 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: The circles look to me like they were made by the abrasion tool. Since the debris is sensitive to different colors, the material below the surface must be different. I would hope that the spectrum is matched against a earth spectrum to tell us what that material is, but maybe someone on here has the equipment to diagnose that and can feed us the answers. Bob ----- Original Message ----- From: "alexander hollins" To: Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2004 8:04 AM Subject: odd triangle circle image times two > href="http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/p/037/1P131462702EFF0510P 2390L4M1-BR.JPG"> > link1 > > href="http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/p/037/1P131473332ESF0510P 2532R1M1-BR.JPG">link2 > > > the same odd looking circle on two faces... whats > up? > > putting together the images where they have the right > filters on right cam, theres a blue tinge around the > cirlce. > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Search - Find what you're looking for faster > http://search.yahoo.com > > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Mar 4 08:29:41 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i24GTR8s023141; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 08:29:32 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i24GTLcs023074; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 08:29:21 -0800 Resent-Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 08:29:21 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-Id: <2.2.32.20040304162741.006bc718 pop.freeserve.net> X-Sender: grimer2.freeserve.co.uk pop.freeserve.net X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 2.2 (32) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2004 16:27:41 +0000 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Grimer Subject: Re: More on bubble fusion Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53405 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: The latest publicity on sonofusion is very encouraging. I would suggest it lends support to the view that sonofusion and "cold fusion" are simply two sides of the same coin. With deuterated acetone cavitation is taking place in a material with a relatively low bulk modulus. In the case of palladium and similar metals it is taking place in materials with modulii an order of magnitude higher. Now since - "The researchers believe the new evidence shows that 'sonofusion' generates nuclear reactions by creating tiny bubbles that implode with tremendous force." - it is not unreasonable to suppose that the collapse of internal high pF cavities in metals will generate forces which are an order of magnitude higher. It is said that seeing is believing. What better evidence of an implosion could be asked for than the illustration on the front cover of Mizuno's book, "Nuclear Transmutation, The reality of Cold fusion," translated by Jed. This interpretation has been pointed out before by two contributors to Vortex and so far has not been gainsaid by anyone. Perhaps this is because Vortexians have frequent baths and recognise a Vortex when they see one. 8-) Now cavitation in metals takes place under certain optimum conditions. Very ductile metals such as aluminium do not cavitate in tension, neither do brittle metals such as cast iron. There would seem to be a certain optimum structure of a metal (and a liquid for that matter) which maximizes the degree of cavitation under stress. Since mild steel is perhaps the archetypal example of metallic cavitation it may be that its stress-strain curve with the characteristic yield plateau is the kind of discontinuity in hierarchical structure one should be looking for. Frank Grimer From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Mar 4 09:51:50 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i24HphXl028884; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 09:51:45 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i24HowpF027428; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 09:50:58 -0800 Resent-Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 09:50:58 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <40476C70.60201 rtpatlanta.com> Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2004 12:50:40 -0500 From: "Terry Blanton" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Taleyarkhan wins! References: <002801c401c8$ad0e50a0$c864a8c0 win98> In-Reply-To: <002801c401c8$ad0e50a0$c864a8c0 win98> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53406 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: hamdix iris.com.tr wrote: >Finally sonofusion in mainstream! > >http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2004/03/040303080222.htm >"Evidence Bubbles Over To Support Tabletop Nuclear Fusion Device" > >http://news.uns.purdue.edu/html4ever/2004/0400302.Taleyarkhan.fusion.html > If we're lucky, they will continue to argue about where to build the ITER until sonofusion advances enough to eliminate magnetic containment. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Mar 4 09:57:48 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i24HvfXl008117; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 09:57:42 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i24Hvd3U008015; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 09:57:39 -0800 Resent-Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 09:57:39 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <20040304175714.45419.qmail web11708.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 09:57:14 -0800 (PST) From: alexander hollins Subject: Re: More Information on the PanCam To: vortex-l eskimo.com In-Reply-To: <001001c401d4$4a5e8720$6401a8c0 Craig> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53407 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: gracias. i may have a way to get that info. let me call in a few favors. --- SnowDog wrote: > I found more information on the PanCam. 1) Exposure > times on the PanCam have > been optimized for good color through filters in the > visual range. 2) The > PanCam enhances each and every image for a maximum > signal/noise ratio. With > images taken with the rover in the foreground, there > is inevitably something > bright and shiny, or white, in the image which > prevents much modification by > the PanCam, before transmission. Therefore, pictures > of the rover, and the > color wheel come out looking good, with no > modification. When the PanCam > images something in the environment, the picture is > typically dark, and > images in the blue filter are the darkest, so these > images are enhanced the > most. Therefore things come out with a strong blue > bias. So the color > balance is being seriously altered by the PanCam > before transmission by the > rover. Why? I don't know since the images are > compressed before transmission > these days. What I need now is to learn how to find > out how to determine the > calibration factor on the images. There is no > correlation that can be > applied from one image to another as one might > expect. The color wheel is > useless without knowing the calibration factor for > each image. > > Also, images are being calibrated for white light > these days. Mars still > looks quite red, but there is more evidence now that > the images modified by > the Viking team were modified to be way too red, and > may have even have had > blue skies in some of them. New studies include > information from the > Pathfinder solar cells which indicate no loss of > power that would be > expected if the sky were tainted red. Also, the > Hubble has done some work > imaging Mars and the evidence indicates a minimal > reddish tint to the > atmosphere. > > Craig Haynie > > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Search - Find what you’re looking for faster http://search.yahoo.com From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Mar 4 11:29:05 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i24JSsXl012387; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 11:28:59 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i24JSl56012332; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 11:28:47 -0800 Resent-Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 11:28:47 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 10:33:46 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Rover track drains Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53408 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: I wrote earlier: "An obvious test for surface water is to dig/brush a hole in one of the wet flat sandy looking areas." The effect of this would not be to produce a puddle, as I was originally thinking, but rather to produce a drain hole. By breaking the waterproof surface, a pathway would be established to the higly absorbent layer beneath. A water or brine puddle could only exist on the surface because the surface is waterproof, or merely frozen. In effect, the rover wheels provide a surface puncturing mechanism. They not only break the surface, but crunch it up and comapct it into tracks. The compacted track material appears to be very absorbent. Toggeling between Sol 37 pancam views: >http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/p/037/1P131475626EFF0510P2534 L4M1.JPG< and: >http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/p/037/1P131475674EFF0510P2534 L5M1.JPG< shows what appears to be water moving into a rover track, which acts like drain. An earlier view exists, 13:32:40 Sol 36, but the track is already in place and the vicinity unfortunately already looks pretty well drained: >http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/n/036/1N131386579EFF0510P1937R >0M1.JPG< There is nothing definitive that I have seen so far. Once again, the above apparent water flow might be merely an illusion due to use of differing filters. It is really hard to tell if some areas are standing water or merely fine dust deposits. Definitive proof would consist of finding a "before" photo with no rover track and an "after" photo of a rover track through a wet looking puddle-like formation. If the after photo shows the swamp drained, then that is a pretty good indicator of surface water/brine. The only other alternative would be a that the dust is in a nearly liquid form, but that is not very reasonable because there is no osmotic effect to account for the dust being sponged up by the rover track. However, despite lack of definitve proof, it is tantalizing if you look very carefully at: >http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/p/037/1P131475626EFF0510P2534 L4M1.JPG< and: >http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/p/037/1P131475674EFF0510P2534 L5M1.JPG< while rapidly toggeling them. You can see that possibly the top most track tread indentation, a very narrow trough, may have water, or at least a wet area, visible in it for a short length, the water appearing to flow right to left. The subject area is in the rightmost portion of the trough. It looks like there is a tiny grain just at the trough entrance that moves a fraction of a mm into the trough in the 48 second time frame between the two photos. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Mar 4 13:24:32 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i24LOOXl004598; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 13:24:28 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i24LOGhY004449; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 13:24:16 -0800 Resent-Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 13:24:16 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <002b01c40226$9a5522a0$2280b341 computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: Subject: Re: Spark Machining vs Sonofusion? Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 14:23:46 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-ELNK-Trace: 0b1c9d71006e06a171639b933de7ae6f7e972de0d01da94011496457116373baad6026719c005c16350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53409 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: I wonder, what if a Deuterated Oil was used under a high pressure of D2, say 200 ATM or more? http://www.bath.ac.uk/~en9smd/spark.htm "Electric Discharge Machining (EDM) is a metal removal process where two electrodes are used to produce a spark. The anode (positive electrode) is the Workpiece itself and the cathode (negative electrode) is the tool, shaped with the inverse of the detail required. The two electrodes never actually come in contact and a small gap is maintained between them at all times by computer control. The two electrodes are submerged in a dielectric fluid, which allows a path for the electric discharge to be made, cools the tool and workpiece and removes any waste products. The resistance of the dielectric fluid is crucial in producing a good surface finish since it controls the frequency of discharge." "The discharges are produced by a D.C. power supply, which is connected to the two electrodes and travel through the dielectric fluid ionising it. Thermal energy is produced in the form of localised heat and the temperature reaches appproximately 12000°C, which is sufficient to melt and vaporise the material. Hundreds of thousands of discharges occur each second, each only the length of the diameter of a hair and the area around the tool is gradually eroded. Of course, the tool is also eroded like the workpiece as tool material is also subjected to the intense heating. Tool wear is measured as the ratio of workpiece material removed to tool material removed and this can vary greatly depending on tool and workpiece materials used - from about 1 to 100." Regards, Frederick From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Mar 4 14:15:57 2004 Received: from ultra1.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra1.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra1.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i24MFuEJ022860; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 14:15:56 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra1.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i24MFUxY022815; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 14:15:30 -0800 Resent-Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 14:15:30 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra1.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <000f01c40236$3247eac0$0100a8c0 rebradyboxx> From: "rebrady" To: Subject: Vugs Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 14:14:52 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/related; type="multipart/alternative"; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0007_01C401F3.0FB81720" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53410 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C401F3.0FB81720 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_001_0008_01C401F3.0FB81720" ------=_NextPart_001_0008_01C401F3.0FB81720 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable GlacierI am not seeing vugs with crystals that I can identify. I see = dust particle or something like sand. Is sand the residue of quartz = crystals what is meant or is their something else? It must be my tired = old eyes. Bob Brady ------=_NextPart_001_0008_01C401F3.0FB81720 Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Glacier
I am not seeing vugs with crystals that I can identify.  I see = dust=20 particle or something like sand.  Is sand the residue of quartz = crystals=20 what is meant or is their something else?  It must be my tired old=20 eyes.
 
Bob Brady

 

------=_NextPart_001_0008_01C401F3.0FB81720-- ------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C401F3.0FB81720 Content-Type: image/jpeg; name="Glacier Bkgrd.jpg" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-ID: <000601c40236$1db9ec70$0100a8c0 rebradyboxx> /9j/4AAQSkZJRgABAgEASABIAAD/7QSqUGhvdG9zaG9wIDMuMAA4QklNA+kAAAAAAHgAAwAAAEgA SAAAAAAC2gIo/+H/4QL5AkUDRwUoA/wAAgAAAEgASAAAAAAC2AIoAAEAAABkAAAAAQADAwMAAAAB Jw8AAQABAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAYAgAGQGQAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA4 QklNA+0AAAAAABAASAAAAAEAAQBIAAAAAQABOEJJTQPzAAAAAAAIAAAAAAAAAAA4QklNBAoAAAAA AAEAADhCSU0nEAAAAAAACgABAAAAAAAAAAI4QklNA/UAAAAAAEgAL2ZmAAEAbGZmAAYAAAAAAAEA L2ZmAAEAoZmaAAYAAAAAAAEAMgAAAAEAWgAAAAYAAAAAAAEANQAAAAEALQAAAAYAAAAAAAE4QklN A/gAAAAAAHAAAP////////////////////////////8D6AAAAAD///////////////////////// ////A+gAAAAA/////////////////////////////wPoAAAAAP////////////////////////// //8D6AAAOEJJTQQAAAAAAAACAAA4QklNBAIAAAAAAAIAADhCSU0ECAAAAAAAEAAAAAEAAAJAAAAC QAAAAAA4QklNBAkAAAAAApkAAAABAAAAgAAAAAEAAAGAAAABgAAAAn0AGAAB/9j/4AAQSkZJRgAB AgEASABIAAD//gAnRmlsZSB3cml0dGVuIGJ5IEFkb2JlIFBob3Rvc2hvcKggNC4wAP/uAA5BZG9i ZQBkgAAAAAH/2wCEAAwICAgJCAwJCQwRCwoLERUPDAwPFRgTExUTExgRDAwMDAwMEQwMDAwMDAwM DAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwBDQsLDQ4NEA4OEBQODg4UFA4ODg4UEQwMDAwMEREMDAwMDAwR DAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDP/AABEIAAEAgAMBIgACEQEDEQH/3QAEAAj/xAE/ AAABBQEBAQEBAQAAAAAAAAADAAECBAUGBwgJCgsBAAEFAQEBAQEBAAAAAAAAAAEAAgMEBQYHCAkK CxAAAQQBAwIEAgUHBggFAwwzAQACEQMEIRIxBUFRYRMicYEyBhSRobFCIyQVUsFiMzRygtFDByWS U/Dh8WNzNRaisoMmRJNUZEXCo3Q2F9JV4mXys4TD03Xj80YnlKSFtJXE1OT0pbXF1eX1VmZ2hpam tsbW5vY3R1dnd4eXp7fH1+f3EQACAgECBAQDBAUGBwcGBTUBAAIRAyExEgRBUWFxIhMFMoGRFKGx QiPBUtHwMyRi4XKCkkNTFWNzNPElBhaisoMHJjXC0kSTVKMXZEVVNnRl4vKzhMPTdePzRpSkhbSV xNTk9KW1xdXl9VZmdoaWprbG1ub2JzdHV2d3h5ent8f/2gAMAwEAAhEDEQA/APTqPon4/wAAir5X SQGyn6oSXyukip+qEl8rpJKfqhJfK6SSn6oSXyukkp+qEl8rpJKfqhJfK6SSn6oSXyukkp//2QA4 QklNBAYAAAAAAAcABAAAAAEBAP/+ACdGaWxlIHdyaXR0ZW4gYnkgQWRvYmUgUGhvdG9zaG9wqCA0 LjAA/+4ADkFkb2JlAGQAAAAAAf/bAIQABgQEBwUHCwYGCw4KCAoOEQ4ODg4RFhMTExMTFhEMDAwM DAwRDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAEHCQkTDBMiExMiFA4ODhQUDg4ODhQRDAwM DAwREQwMDAwMDBEMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwM/8AAEQgAAwZAAwERAAIRAQMR Af/dAAQAyP/EAaIAAAAHAQEBAQEAAAAAAAAAAAQFAwIGAQAHCAkKCwEAAgIDAQEBAQEAAAAAAAAA AQACAwQFBgcICQoLEAACAQMDAgQCBgcDBAIGAnMBAgMRBAAFIRIxQVEGE2EicYEUMpGhBxWxQiPB UtHhMxZi8CRygvElQzRTkqKyY3PCNUQnk6OzNhdUZHTD0uIIJoMJChgZhJRFRqS0VtNVKBry4/PE 1OT0ZXWFlaW1xdXl9WZ2hpamtsbW5vY3R1dnd4eXp7fH1+f3OEhYaHiImKi4yNjo+Ck5SVlpeYmZ qbnJ2en5KjpKWmp6ipqqusra6voRAAICAQIDBQUEBQYECAMDbQEAAhEDBCESMUEFURNhIgZxgZEy obHwFMHR4SNCFVJicvEzJDRDghaSUyWiY7LCB3PSNeJEgxdUkwgJChgZJjZFGidkdFU38qOzwygp 0+PzhJSktMTU5PRldYWVpbXF1eX1RlZmdoaWprbG1ub2R1dnd4eXp7fH1+f3OEhYaHiImKi4yNjo +DlJWWl5iZmpucnZ6fkqOkpaanqKmqq6ytrq+v/aAAwDAQACEQMRAD8A9N/vv+Lv+SWFhv5/7F37 7/i7/kliu/n/ALFbJ63H/dv0+lTFd/P/AGKj++/y/wDkliu/n/sVa29Tl8fSn7fCn/JPfFIRH/AY GTv+AxV3/AYq7/gMVd/wGKu/4DFXf8Birv8AgMVd/wABirv+AxV3/AYq7/gMVd/wGKu/4DFXf8Bi rv8AgMVd/wABirv+AxV3/AYq7/gMVd/wGKu/4DFXf8Birv8AgMVd/wABirv+AxV3/AYq7/gMVd/w GKu/4DFXf8Birv8AgMVd/wABirv+AxV3/AYq7/gMVd/wGKu/4DFXf8Birv8AgMVd/wABirv+AxV3 /AYq7/gMVd/wGKu/4DFXf8Birv8AgMVd/wABirv+AxV3/AYq7/gMVd/wGKu/4DFXf8Birv8AgMVd /wABirv+AxV3/AYq7/gMVd/wGKu/4DFXf8Birv8AgMVd/wABirv+AxV3/AYq7/gMVd/wGKu/4DFX f8Birv8AgMVd/wABirv+AxV3/AYq7/gMVd/wGKu/4DFXf8Birv8AgMVd/wABirv+AxV3/AYq7/gM Vd/wGKu/4DFXf8Birv8AgMVd/wABirv+AxV3/AYq7/gMVd/wGKu/4DFXf8Birv8AgMVd/wABirv+ AxV3/AYq7/gMVd/wGKu/4DFXf8Birv8AgMVd/wABirv+AxV3/AYq7/gMVd/wGKu/4DFXf8Birv8A gMVd/wABirv+AxV3/AYq7/gMVd/wGKu/4DFXf8Birv8AgMVd/wABirv+AxV3/AYq7/gMVd/wGKu/ 4DFXf8Birv8AgMVd/wABirv+AxV3/AYq7/gMVd/wGKu/4DFXf8Birv8AgMVd/wABirv+AxV3/AYq 7/gMVd/wGKu/4DFXf8Birv8AgMVd/wABirv+AxV3/AYq7/gMVd/wGKu/4DFXf8Birv8AgMVd/wAB irv+AxV3/AYq7/gMVd/wGKu/4DFXf8Birv8AgMVd/wABirv+AxV3/AYq7/gMVd/wGKu/4DFXf8Bi rv8AgMVd/wABirv+AxV3/AYq7/gMVd/wGKu/4DFXf8Birv8AgMVd/wABirv+AxV3/AYq7/gMVd/w GKu/4DFXf8Birv8AgMVd/wABirv+AxV3/AYq7/gMVd/wGKu/4DFXf8Birv8AgMVd/wABirv+AxV3 /AYq/wD/2Q== ------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C401F3.0FB81720-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Mar 4 15:06:05 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i24N5nXl010823; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 15:05:51 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i24N5YPp010720; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 15:05:34 -0800 Resent-Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 15:05:34 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <006001c40234$a7239b20$2280b341 computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: Subject: Re: Bill's Address Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 16:03:16 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-ELNK-Trace: 0b1c9d71006e06a171639b933de7ae6f7e972de0d01da9409c61e6d814ad7d700ea13f742db918ef350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53411 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Time to anti up folks. :-) Moderator: billb eskimo.com William J. Beaty 7540 20th Ave NW Seattle, WA 98117 206-788-0775 USA Regards, Frederick From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Mar 5 08:37:06 2004 Received: from ultra1.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra1.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra1.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i25Gb4EJ008296; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 08:37:04 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra1.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i25GaYIO008218; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 08:36:34 -0800 Resent-Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 08:36:34 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra1.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <001801c402d0$02de9050$0100a8c0 rebradyboxx> From: "rebrady" To: Subject: Unusual Markings Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 08:36:19 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/related; type="multipart/alternative"; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0014_01C4028C.EEC56F50" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53412 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0014_01C4028C.EEC56F50 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_001_0015_01C4028C.EEC56F50" ------=_NextPart_001_0015_01C4028C.EEC56F50 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Glacier The picture from Guadalupe has several markings in it that look similar = to the picture below. The oval area is not as deep and is not exactly = oval. The black areas are deeper at the ends and less deep at the = intersection. Just ahead, in the valley of the "Y" there is a slight = mound. In the Guadalupe picture from Opportunity, I count three full = images and several partials. This picture is featured today on the JPL = site, = http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/newsroom/pressreleases/20040302a.html = where it describes these marks as vugs, which were once filled by = crystal salts which have since dissolved or blown away. =20 I also note that there are "stems" on several of the pictures of = "balls." JPL is taking the position that the balls were most likely = formed locally rather than blown there from a volcano (although that is = still is a possibility). =20 =20 Bob Brady ------=_NextPart_001_0015_01C4028C.EEC56F50 Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Glacier
 
The picture from Guadalupe has several markings in it that look = similar to=20 the picture below.  The oval area is not as deep and is not exactly = oval.
The black areas are deeper at the ends and less deep at the=20 intersection.  Just ahead, in the valley of the "Y" there is a = slight=20 mound.  In the Guadalupe picture from Opportunity, I count three = full=20 images and several partials.  This picture is featured today on the = JPL=20 site, http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/newsroom/pressreleases/20040302a.html=  where=20 it describes these marks as vugs, which were once filled by crystal = salts which=20 have since dissolved or blown away. 
 

 

I also note that = there are=20 "stems" on several of the pictures of "balls."  JPL is taking the = position=20 that the balls were most likely formed locally rather than blown there = from a=20 volcano (although that is still is a possibility). 

 

Bob = Brady

------=_NextPart_001_0015_01C4028C.EEC56F50-- ------=_NextPart_000_0014_01C4028C.EEC56F50 Content-Type: image/gif; name="clip_image002.gif" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-ID: <001201c402cf$fcc4d3a0$0100a8c0 rebradyboxx> R0lGODlhPABFAHcAMSH+GlNvZnR3YXJlOiBNaWNyb3NvZnQgT2ZmaWNlACH5BAEAAAAALAAAAAA6 AEIAhgAAAAAAAA0MDRAPEBAQEAoKChMTExsaGxIREhcWFxEQEQ4ODh8eHxISEgcHBwwLDAICAggI CA0NDQkJCQ0MDAwMDBkYGQYGBgsLCxMSEwYFBgoICAMDAw8ODwwLCxERERQTExUUFA8PDxQUFBQT FDY0NiwqKy8tLygmKCgnKCYkJT88PjIwMjg2OCEgIT07PSgmJyooKiclJkVCRF5bXVNPUktIS11Z XFhUV01KTFFOUGFdYGRgY3ZydWVhZH14e3Bsb2pmaW1pbG5qbXt2emdiZnNvcoN+gpaQlImEiIiC h46IjZyWm5CKjqKcoa+oramip7u0urWus8K6wMjAxgECAwECAwECAwECAwECAwECAwECAwECAwEC AwECAwECAwECAwECAwECAwECAwECAwECAwECAwECAwECAwECAwECAwECAwECAwECAwECAwECAwEC AwECAwECAwECAwECAwECAwECAwECAwECAwECAwECAwECAwECAwECAwECAwECAwf/gACCg4SFhoeI iYqEAY2LhgEAAgOUkY+XAI6NjpgAAwQ8PUhISTwlBZadkJuZrJcHSVSys7JPMwOqhZucu4sIPrTB s1AJuYK9jJyICkrCzlRRJrm7qceuhghLz89TDJ3IuuCENNvbTw2X1IjqhCfl5UsIi+zr4ANQ7+Ul 1eHXicgOauQr50RBPWWPej2QMrBcjUP00jWCILDhNikR+iHEtCmWxW0oUkX81ojBlI/PfkiwtlHV LhsonUWZ0MqfMQebfsQUlmLkTRuNKDzZOetJBXHGBJ3o1sjEyZ1PLCBNGuAGFSgXGuHYGUXF1KQD PALpiLJrowsYkh5awGTWiqAM/xuaDXChSUi1hQoMlRVFagAWcr02akLlBN5CEeLKYpI1AI98cwPo pDKDn9oAwoJsQlIu8mQqOQ4zcsaiUQbFwTzT4mGZqjMpGRoBFqaa1o3WxjREcYZkE5DUgiULqyxa kN5nrOm2lTWlRU5nJYoLkuBkW+kAFnY3f+7sbvEBhJ89odBoxfZGPbYdkA5gw+9tSTa52PSYGwf2 AF68w0Gt/jMmC+BHwDtTwBAAKv49AwR+AOj2jhCNxJAPcex1cMQ7PzQC0zseMBiAO+VkGMCG2yCB C4MT7LaNiCQ+QyF+AqS3ooblTFEAg8ccECKN2wyxEo4AfEDEjCNuM0UHQA7SwZFTwrDY449JDlBE SjwKI8UDSRICwnLBONldloWEgJosXgajgwhgMiKDirOUOYsRI6SpSwL4tFmlLDpkICckJPTwVJlM oLBnIgJ0sIMTLEpxBAoBDqpIBRLsEkEHuDm6SqWWXopppsm0xClENn16kKjzhEpqp5uK+tWpg5jK ak2pfroqq7PS6umrtZKaq6q3FhcIADs= ------=_NextPart_000_0014_01C4028C.EEC56F50 Content-Type: image/jpeg; name="Glacier Bkgrd.jpg" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-ID: <001301c402cf$fce3f460$0100a8c0 rebradyboxx> /9j/4AAQSkZJRgABAgEASABIAAD/7QSqUGhvdG9zaG9wIDMuMAA4QklNA+kAAAAAAHgAAwAAAEgA SAAAAAAC2gIo/+H/4QL5AkUDRwUoA/wAAgAAAEgASAAAAAAC2AIoAAEAAABkAAAAAQADAwMAAAAB Jw8AAQABAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAYAgAGQGQAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA4 QklNA+0AAAAAABAASAAAAAEAAQBIAAAAAQABOEJJTQPzAAAAAAAIAAAAAAAAAAA4QklNBAoAAAAA AAEAADhCSU0nEAAAAAAACgABAAAAAAAAAAI4QklNA/UAAAAAAEgAL2ZmAAEAbGZmAAYAAAAAAAEA L2ZmAAEAoZmaAAYAAAAAAAEAMgAAAAEAWgAAAAYAAAAAAAEANQAAAAEALQAAAAYAAAAAAAE4QklN A/gAAAAAAHAAAP////////////////////////////8D6AAAAAD///////////////////////// ////A+gAAAAA/////////////////////////////wPoAAAAAP////////////////////////// //8D6AAAOEJJTQQAAAAAAAACAAA4QklNBAIAAAAAAAIAADhCSU0ECAAAAAAAEAAAAAEAAAJAAAAC QAAAAAA4QklNBAkAAAAAApkAAAABAAAAgAAAAAEAAAGAAAABgAAAAn0AGAAB/9j/4AAQSkZJRgAB AgEASABIAAD//gAnRmlsZSB3cml0dGVuIGJ5IEFkb2JlIFBob3Rvc2hvcKggNC4wAP/uAA5BZG9i ZQBkgAAAAAH/2wCEAAwICAgJCAwJCQwRCwoLERUPDAwPFRgTExUTExgRDAwMDAwMEQwMDAwMDAwM DAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwBDQsLDQ4NEA4OEBQODg4UFA4ODg4UEQwMDAwMEREMDAwMDAwR DAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDP/AABEIAAEAgAMBIgACEQEDEQH/3QAEAAj/xAE/ AAABBQEBAQEBAQAAAAAAAAADAAECBAUGBwgJCgsBAAEFAQEBAQEBAAAAAAAAAAEAAgMEBQYHCAkK CxAAAQQBAwIEAgUHBggFAwwzAQACEQMEIRIxBUFRYRMicYEyBhSRobFCIyQVUsFiMzRygtFDByWS U/Dh8WNzNRaisoMmRJNUZEXCo3Q2F9JV4mXys4TD03Xj80YnlKSFtJXE1OT0pbXF1eX1VmZ2hpam tsbW5vY3R1dnd4eXp7fH1+f3EQACAgECBAQDBAUGBwcGBTUBAAIRAyExEgRBUWFxIhMFMoGRFKGx QiPBUtHwMyRi4XKCkkNTFWNzNPElBhaisoMHJjXC0kSTVKMXZEVVNnRl4vKzhMPTdePzRpSkhbSV xNTk9KW1xdXl9VZmdoaWprbG1ub2JzdHV2d3h5ent8f/2gAMAwEAAhEDEQA/APTqPon4/wAAir5X SQGyn6oSXyukip+qEl8rpJKfqhJfK6SSn6oSXyukkp+qEl8rpJKfqhJfK6SSn6oSXyukkp//2QA4 QklNBAYAAAAAAAcABAAAAAEBAP/+ACdGaWxlIHdyaXR0ZW4gYnkgQWRvYmUgUGhvdG9zaG9wqCA0 LjAA/+4ADkFkb2JlAGQAAAAAAf/bAIQABgQEBwUHCwYGCw4KCAoOEQ4ODg4RFhMTExMTFhEMDAwM DAwRDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAEHCQkTDBMiExMiFA4ODhQUDg4ODhQRDAwM DAwREQwMDAwMDBEMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwM/8AAEQgAAwZAAwERAAIRAQMR Af/dAAQAyP/EAaIAAAAHAQEBAQEAAAAAAAAAAAQFAwIGAQAHCAkKCwEAAgIDAQEBAQEAAAAAAAAA AQACAwQFBgcICQoLEAACAQMDAgQCBgcDBAIGAnMBAgMRBAAFIRIxQVEGE2EicYEUMpGhBxWxQiPB UtHhMxZi8CRygvElQzRTkqKyY3PCNUQnk6OzNhdUZHTD0uIIJoMJChgZhJRFRqS0VtNVKBry4/PE 1OT0ZXWFlaW1xdXl9WZ2hpamtsbW5vY3R1dnd4eXp7fH1+f3OEhYaHiImKi4yNjo+Ck5SVlpeYmZ qbnJ2en5KjpKWmp6ipqqusra6voRAAICAQIDBQUEBQYECAMDbQEAAhEDBCESMUEFURNhIgZxgZEy obHwFMHR4SNCFVJicvEzJDRDghaSUyWiY7LCB3PSNeJEgxdUkwgJChgZJjZFGidkdFU38qOzwygp 0+PzhJSktMTU5PRldYWVpbXF1eX1RlZmdoaWprbG1ub2R1dnd4eXp7fH1+f3OEhYaHiImKi4yNjo +DlJWWl5iZmpucnZ6fkqOkpaanqKmqq6ytrq+v/aAAwDAQACEQMRAD8A9N/vv+Lv+SWFhv5/7F37 7/i7/kliu/n/ALFbJ63H/dv0+lTFd/P/AGKj++/y/wDkliu/n/sVa29Tl8fSn7fCn/JPfFIRH/AY GTv+AxV3/AYq7/gMVd/wGKu/4DFXf8Birv8AgMVd/wABirv+AxV3/AYq7/gMVd/wGKu/4DFXf8Bi rv8AgMVd/wABirv+AxV3/AYq7/gMVd/wGKu/4DFXf8Birv8AgMVd/wABirv+AxV3/AYq7/gMVd/w GKu/4DFXf8Birv8AgMVd/wABirv+AxV3/AYq7/gMVd/wGKu/4DFXf8Birv8AgMVd/wABirv+AxV3 /AYq7/gMVd/wGKu/4DFXf8Birv8AgMVd/wABirv+AxV3/AYq7/gMVd/wGKu/4DFXf8Birv8AgMVd /wABirv+AxV3/AYq7/gMVd/wGKu/4DFXf8Birv8AgMVd/wABirv+AxV3/AYq7/gMVd/wGKu/4DFX f8Birv8AgMVd/wABirv+AxV3/AYq7/gMVd/wGKu/4DFXf8Birv8AgMVd/wABirv+AxV3/AYq7/gM Vd/wGKu/4DFXf8Birv8AgMVd/wABirv+AxV3/AYq7/gMVd/wGKu/4DFXf8Birv8AgMVd/wABirv+ AxV3/AYq7/gMVd/wGKu/4DFXf8Birv8AgMVd/wABirv+AxV3/AYq7/gMVd/wGKu/4DFXf8Birv8A gMVd/wABirv+AxV3/AYq7/gMVd/wGKu/4DFXf8Birv8AgMVd/wABirv+AxV3/AYq7/gMVd/wGKu/ 4DFXf8Birv8AgMVd/wABirv+AxV3/AYq7/gMVd/wGKu/4DFXf8Birv8AgMVd/wABirv+AxV3/AYq 7/gMVd/wGKu/4DFXf8Birv8AgMVd/wABirv+AxV3/AYq7/gMVd/wGKu/4DFXf8Birv8AgMVd/wAB irv+AxV3/AYq7/gMVd/wGKu/4DFXf8Birv8AgMVd/wABirv+AxV3/AYq7/gMVd/wGKu/4DFXf8Bi rv8AgMVd/wABirv+AxV3/AYq7/gMVd/wGKu/4DFXf8Birv8AgMVd/wABirv+AxV3/AYq7/gMVd/w GKu/4DFXf8Birv8AgMVd/wABirv+AxV3/AYq7/gMVd/wGKu/4DFXf8Birv8AgMVd/wABirv+AxV3 /AYq/wD/2Q== ------=_NextPart_000_0014_01C4028C.EEC56F50-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Mar 5 09:58:38 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i25Hv8Pp029979; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 09:58:31 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i25HuY2N029789; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 09:56:34 -0800 Resent-Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 09:56:34 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Reply-To: From: "Keith Nagel" To: "Vortex" Subject: OT> Chenobyl dead zone Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 13:20:07 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Importance: Normal X-Rcpt-To: Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53413 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Hi All. Let this attractive young Virgil take you on her 1100CC Kawasaki death machine for a short tour through one of the lowest rungs of modernities Inferno. >http://www.angelfire.com/extreme4/kiddofspeed/page2.html< Remarkable, huh??? K. I suppose this is an exercise in futility, but for the benefit of folks like Condy Rice here's a few more relevant links. >http://www.antenna.nl/wise/573/5434.html< >http://www.riverkeeper.org/campaign.php/indian_point/we_are_doing/588< From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Mar 5 10:22:52 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i25ILEPp008797; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 10:22:43 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i25ILBPp008781; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 10:21:11 -0800 Resent-Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 10:21:11 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <003101c402de$4858f040$8837fea9 cpq> From: "Jones Beene" To: "vortex" Subject: New deuteron stripping research Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 10:18:38 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_002E_01C4029B.39C03220" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53414 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_002E_01C4029B.39C03220 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Some new work on deuteron stripping (which does not mention cold fusion) = has been reported. Notably, it is from Russia and Eastern Europe (more = on that later).=20 It reports on a "threshold anomaly" in the stripping of deuterium by = medium mass nuclei - where the (n,p) stripping reactions occurred at = much lower than expected threshold. The anomaly is related to "isospin = coupling" of proton and neutron channels. Does it have relevance to cold = fusion? I'm not sure yet, but there are several (4?) studies in pdf = format which are worth the time, all similar to this abstract: http://venus.nipne.ro/pr/1999-2000/3/3.2/3.2.1/ [go down to #2. Theoretical Studies on 3-p Anomalies for A=BB 90 = Deuteron Stripping]=20 These are a bit over my head technically, but what they seem to indicate = by implication is that at least one segment of D-Pd cold fusion = reactions will involve a deuteron stripping reaction. At least this is = the implication from this work to those of us who believe that CF could = be a compound assortment of low probability reactions: such as QM = tunneling and other LENR reactions such as stripping - rather that (or = in addition to) real D+D fusion. Occam be damned... In CF, the stripping reaction would be followed by the immediate capture = in the Pd matrix of an 'energy deficient' neutron, such as by 104Pd + n' = > 105 Pd. This could also be related to a version of QM tunneling. It = may or may not be followed by the eventual release of an alpha particle, = depending on how deficient in mass/energy the neutron was at the start - = but always will involve some excess energy. It is possible that the = percentage of captures that do eventually result in alpha release is = coincidentally close to a correlation with the energy of D+D > He.=20 In other words, if every deuteron stripping reaction released several = keV and out of those stripping reactions, one in 10,000 resulted in an = alpha release, then the experimenter might be fooled into believing that = every helium nucleus was accompanied by, say 24 MeV of energy, when in = fact this was not the case at all. In contrast, what may have happened = is that it took 10,000 stripping reactions and one alpha release to = yield the 24 MeV. Improbably! you say? Yes, improbable (but less so with these new = studies). And to my thinking it not nearly so improbably by thousands of = orders of magnitude as the alternative... i.e. trying to explain the = "missing" 24 MeV gamma ray (and the live graduate assistant).=20 The study above doesn't go anywhere near that far, of course but it does = serve to reinforce the sentiment that deuterium stripping should be FAR = more likely to happen in an electrolysis cell than real fusion. The = mechanism for this relates to the strong coupling between the electric = and magnetic dipoles (spin-isopin) which has already been proven to = result in a number of remarkable phenomena including possibly the = 'vortex' itself. Matter of fact, I stumbled on this while trying to = research the case for a theory behind the self-spinning magnetic rotor. When the electric dipoles in D nuclei find 'order' in a particular = confinement regime, even if it is only for a fractional-second, then the = magnetic moments may also undergo a transition into a state in which = neighboring spins will 'want' to merge in to a 'forbidden' pairing. A = this point the deuterium nucleus may release its neutron in some unknown = low-energy way, so that the neutron is energy-poor, and subject to = immediate capture by any nucleus that is relatively depleted of = neutrons, such as 104Pd. Alternatively, we might just say that the = neutron tunneled into the Pd nucleus. As a side note: many who have been interested in "deuterium stripping" = reactions have been rather surprised over the years by the lack of = reported research, when common sense has dictated that the research = should have been done, and anecdote suggests that it was indeed = performed... and in some cases what appears to be stone-walling when old = papers has been requested from official sources. I am not really = 'paranoid' (or maybe am just in denial) and generally prefer to make = light of the conspiracy theorists (Mel Gibson, even before his current = predicament, was the role model for the humor inherent in the paranoid = conspiracy thing). Of course, many of that ilk appear in = disproportionate number on fringe-science forums and some even get = regular messages from the CIA. But in the case of deuterium stripping = there does appear to be something strange going on in the free-flow of = information... the basis of which could possibly relate back to = non-proliferation issues - who knows? but I doubt we would fine that = Dick Cheney even knows what a deuteron is... Jones Who was it that said " just because you're not paranoid doesn't mean = they aren't out to get you"?=20 probably the same wiseacre who said, "just because nobody understands = you, doesn't mean you're artistic"... or, just because you're full doesn't mean you should stop eating... or, more to the case in point... just because I have a fragile ego = doesn't mean I can't beat cliches with a stick... =20 or, even more apropos... just because I write like a fool doesn't mean = I'll always be one.... ------=_NextPart_000_002E_01C4029B.39C03220 Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Some new work on deuteron stripping (which does not mention cold = fusion)=20 has been reported. Notably, it is from Russia and Eastern Europe = (more on=20 that later).
 
It reports on a "threshold anomaly" in the stripping of = deuterium by=20 medium mass nuclei - where the (n,p) stripping reactions occurred = at much=20 lower than expected threshold. The anomaly is related to "isospin = coupling"=20 of proton and neutron channels. Does it have relevance to cold fusion? = I'm not=20 sure yet, but there are several (4?) studies in pdf format which = are worth=20 the time, all similar to this abstract:
http://venus.nip= ne.ro/pr/1999-2000/3/3.2/3.2.1/
[go down to #2. Theoretical Studies on 3-p Anomalies for A=BB 90 = Deuteron=20 Stripping]
 
These are a bit over my head technically, but what they = seem to=20 indicate by implication is that at least one segment of D-Pd cold fusion = reactions will involve a deuteron stripping reaction. At least = this is=20 the implication from this work to those of us who believe that CF could = be a=20 compound assortment of low probability reactions: such as QM = tunneling and=20 other LENR reactions such as stripping - rather that (or in = addition=20 to) real D+D fusion. Occam be damned...
 
In CF, the stripping reaction would be followed by the = immediate=20 capture in the Pd matrix of an 'energy deficient' neutron, such as by = 104Pd + n'=20 > 105 Pd. This could also be related to a version of QM tunneling. It = may or=20 may not be followed by the eventual release of an alpha particle, = depending on=20 how deficient in mass/energy the neutron was at the start - but always = will=20 involve some excess energy. It is possible that the percentage of = captures that=20 do eventually result in alpha release is coincidentally close to a = correlation=20 with the energy of D+D > He.
 
In other words, if every deuteron stripping reaction released = several=20 keV and out of those stripping reactions, one in 10,000 resulted in an = alpha=20 release, then the experimenter might be fooled into believing that every = helium=20 nucleus was accompanied by, say 24 MeV of energy, when in fact this was = not the=20 case at all. In contrast, what may have happened is that it took 10,000=20 stripping reactions and one alpha release to yield the 24 MeV.
 
Improbably! you say? Yes, improbable (but less so with these = new=20 studies). And to my thinking it not nearly so improbably by thousands of = orders=20 of magnitude as the alternative... i.e. trying to explain the "missing" = 24 MeV=20 gamma ray (and the live graduate assistant).
 
The study above doesn't go anywhere near that far, of course but it = does serve to reinforce the sentiment that deuterium = stripping should=20 be FAR more likely to happen in an electrolysis cell than real = fusion. The=20 mechanism for this relates to the strong coupling between the = electric and=20 magnetic dipoles (spin-isopin) which has already been proven to result = in a=20 number of remarkable phenomena including possibly the 'vortex' = itself.=20 Matter of fact, I stumbled on this while trying to research the case for = a=20 theory behind the self-spinning magnetic rotor.
 
When the electric dipoles in D nuclei find 'order' in a = particular=20 confinement regime, even if it is only for a fractional-second, = then the=20 magnetic moments may also undergo a transition into a state in which = neighboring=20 spins will 'want' to merge in to a 'forbidden' pairing. A this point the = deuterium nucleus may release its neutron in some unknown low-energy = way, so=20 that the neutron is energy-poor, and subject to immediate = capture by=20 any nucleus that is relatively depleted of neutrons, such as 104Pd.=20 Alternatively, we might just say that the neutron tunneled into the Pd=20 nucleus.
 
As a side note: many who have been interested in "deuterium = stripping"=20 reactions have been rather surprised over the years by the lack of = reported=20 research, when common sense has dictated that the research should have = been=20 done, and anecdote suggests that it was indeed performed... and in = some=20 cases what appears to be stone-walling when old papers has been = requested from=20 official sources. I am not really 'paranoid' (or maybe am just in = denial) and=20 generally prefer to make light of the conspiracy theorists (Mel Gibson, = even=20 before his current predicament, was the role model for the humor = inherent in the=20 paranoid conspiracy thing). Of course, many of that ilk appear in=20 disproportionate number on fringe-science forums and some even get = regular=20 messages from the CIA. But in the case of deuterium stripping there does = appear=20 to be something strange going on in the free-flow of information... the = basis of=20 which could possibly relate back to non-proliferation issues - who = knows? but I=20 doubt we would fine that Dick Cheney even knows what a deuteron = is...
 
Jones
 
Who was it that said " just because you're not paranoid doesn't = mean they=20 aren't out to get you"?
 
probably the same wiseacre who said, "just because nobody = understands you,=20 doesn't mean you're artistic"...
 
or,  just because you're full doesn't mean you should stop=20 eating...
 
or, more to the case in point... just because I have = a fragile=20 ego doesn't mean I can't beat cliches with a stick...
 
or, even more apropos... just because I write = like a=20 fool doesn't mean I'll always be one....
 
 
------=_NextPart_000_002E_01C4029B.39C03220-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Mar 5 10:31:24 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i25ITrPp012362; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 10:31:15 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i25ITpTx012330; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 10:29:51 -0800 Resent-Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 10:29:51 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-Id: <6.0.1.1.2.20040305132722.01cba200 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell mindspring.com@pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.1.1 Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2004 13:28:16 -0500 To: vortex-L eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: RE: OT> Chenobyl dead zone Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53415 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: That is ASTOUNDING. The photos and text are both amazing. The author must be nuts. - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Mar 5 10:41:58 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i25IeQPp017875; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 10:41:49 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i25IeNdg017848; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 10:40:23 -0800 Resent-Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 10:40:23 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <003b01c402e0$fda511c0$8837fea9 cpq> From: "Jones Beene" To: , "Vortex" References: Subject: Re: OT> Chenobyl dead zone Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 10:38:01 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ultra5.eskimo.com id i25IcSPp016496 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53416 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: K. > Let this attractive young Virgil take you ... "Virgil?" you Putin me on? or did Dante get off when Homer got on... From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Mar 5 16:05:11 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2603jPp011440; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 16:05:06 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2603fqw011398; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 16:03:41 -0800 Resent-Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 16:03:41 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <001a01c4030e$3f987cc0$c828010a arghou.argcorp.argworldwide.com> From: "SnowDog" To: Subject: Blueberries Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2004 00:01:59 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0017_01C4030E.3F404AA0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Mar 2004 00:02:00.0426 (UTC) FILETIME=[3F934CA0:01C4030E] Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53417 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0017_01C4030E.3F404AA0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable These two seem to have roots. http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/m/039/1M131652949EFF0544P293= 3M2M1.JPG http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/m/028/1M130671947EFF0454P295= 3M2M1.JPG Most of them seem to have navels and a ridge on one side. http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/m/039/1M131649564EFF0544P293= 3M2M1.JPG http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/m/029/1M130760650EFF0454P293= 3M2M1.JPG This one is split in half and seems to be exposing some sort of internal = structure. http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/m/015/1M129515946EFF0312P293= 3M2M1.JPG I think these things may be alive. Aren't they supposed to analyze them = with the APX soon? Craig Haynie ------=_NextPart_000_0017_01C4030E.3F404AA0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
These two seem to have = roots.
 
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/m/039/1M1= 31652949EFF0544P2933M2M1.JPG
 
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/m/028/1M1= 30671947EFF0454P2953M2M1.JPG
 
Most of them seem to have navels and a = ridge on one=20 side.
 
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/m/039/1M1= 31649564EFF0544P2933M2M1.JPG
 
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/m/029/1M1= 30760650EFF0454P2933M2M1.JPG
 
This one is split in half and seems to = be exposing=20 some sort of internal structure.
 
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/m/015/1M1= 29515946EFF0312P2933M2M1.JPG
 
I think these things may be alive. = Aren't they=20 supposed to analyze them with the APX soon?
 
Craig Haynie
 
------=_NextPart_000_0017_01C4030E.3F404AA0-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Mar 5 18:18:05 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i262GSPp007854; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 18:17:49 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i262GQXR007826; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 18:16:26 -0800 Resent-Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 18:16:26 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <410-2200436621928530 ix.netcom.com> X-Priority: 3 Reply-To: aki ix.netcom.com X-Mailer: EarthLink MailBox 2004.1.42.0 (Windows) From: "Akira Kawasaki" To: "vortex-l" Subject: FW: WHAT'S NEW Friday, March 05, 2004 Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 18:19:28 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-ELNK-Trace: c4cc7f5f697e8746f66dc3a06d5924d87c3b1eb3951eb12f41dcc62980be870880a966c17e7b0748350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53418 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: > [Original Message] > From: What's New > To: Akira Kawasaki Date: 3/5/2004 12:57:32 PM Subject: WHAT'S NEW Friday, March 05, 2004 WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 5 Mar 04 Washington, DC 1. POLITICAL SCIENCE: THE ADMINISTRATION ANSWERS THE SCIENTISTS. Barely a week after 60 prominent scientists issued a statement charging the Bush administration with manipulating the science advisory process http://www.aps.org/WN/WN04/wn022004.cfm , the White House delivered an eloquent response two advocates of stem cell research were abruptly ejected from the Council on Bioethics, and replaced on the panel by three appointees whose opposition to stem cell research is solidly faith-based. Anybody else want to speak up? John Marburger, Director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, has apparently been assigned the task of belittling the scientist's statement, but the 60 prominent scientists who signed aren't backing down. 2. ADVERTISING: WHAT IF AN ENEMY MISSILE HAD JUST BEEN LAUNCHED? The question is asked in the new Lockheed Martin ads that appeared this week on TV and in newspapers. An inbound missile is shown, with a cloud-shrouded "target city" far below. "What would it take to stop it?" the ad asks. Answer: "Information, speed and accuracy in a multi-layered system that integrates all three. Decisive action. Missile Defense." But there is no missile defense, and for that matter, there is no missile. The only place a missile could be coming from is Russia, and that's why we still maintain a deterrent. The Lockheed Martin ads just happened to coincide with the first commercials of the Bush campaign. We have been tested, one says, but the challenge was met with "faith, families and sacrifice." 3. BUBBLE FUSION: CORPSE OF "SONOFUSION" IS SAID TO BE TWITCHING. A new claim of desktop fusion from collapsing bubbles is coming out. It's been two years since Taleyarken et al. at Oak Ridge National Laboratory reported in Science magazine that they had observed 2.5 MeV neutron peaks correlated with sonoluminescence from collapsing bubbles http://www.aps.org/WN/WN02/wn030102.cfm , but others could not confirm their results. By mid summer the bubble had burst http://www.aps.org/WN/WN02/wn072602.dfm . That was remarkably similar to the lifetime of cold fusion. But now Taleyarken has new results that some say are more convincing. Perhaps we should wait for independent confirmation. Cold fusion, of course, still has believers, but not much confirmation. 4. MOON-MARS: IF FACTS CHANGE, A REASONABLE MAN CHANGES HIS MIND. An editorial in today's New York Times points out that a few months ago astronaut John Grumsfeld was a "Hubble-hugger" who described his two Hubble repair missions as the most important achievement in his life. Now he defends the decision to kill Hubble http://www.aps.org/WN/WN04/wn012304.cfm . Have the facts changed? Yes, Grumsfeld is now NASA's Chief Scientist. THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND. Opinions are the author's and not necessarily shared by the University of Maryland, but they should be. --- Archives of What's New can be found at http://www.aps.org/WN You are currently subscribed to whatsnew as: aki ix.netcom.com To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-whatsnew-47101V lists.apsmsgs.org To subscribe, send a blank e-mail to: From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Mar 6 00:04:05 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2682iPp031583; Sat, 6 Mar 2004 00:04:02 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2682geu031572; Sat, 6 Mar 2004 00:02:42 -0800 Resent-Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2004 00:02:42 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: rick+highsurf.com mail.highsurf.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <410-2200436621928530 ix.netcom.com> References: <410-2200436621928530 ix.netcom.com> Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 22:01:13 -1000 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Rick Monteverde Subject: Re: FW: WHAT'S NEW Friday, March 05, 2004 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53419 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Parksie writes: >The >only place a missile could be coming from is Russia, and that's > why we still maintain a deterrent. Has this guy ever heard of North Korea? Honolulu, among others, could be that city. We're within range. - Rick From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Mar 6 05:30:29 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i26DT5Pp011833; Sat, 6 Mar 2004 05:30:26 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i26DT4eO011819; Sat, 6 Mar 2004 05:29:04 -0800 Resent-Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2004 05:29:04 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2004 04:33:37 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: FW: WHAT'S NEW Friday, March 05, 2004 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53420 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 10:01 PM 3/5/4, Rick Monteverde wrote: >Parksie writes: > >>The >>only place a missile could be coming from is Russia, and that's >> why we still maintain a deterrent. > > >Has this guy ever heard of North Korea? Honolulu, among others, could be >that city. We're within range. > >- Rick So is much of Alaska, including the Alyeska Pipeline, Anchorage and my little hometown Palmer. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Mar 6 07:02:36 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i26F1OPp004079; Sat, 6 Mar 2004 07:02:32 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i26F1MtC004061; Sat, 6 Mar 2004 07:01:22 -0800 Resent-Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2004 07:01:22 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <001b01c4038b$ac6d53c0$8837fea9 cpq> From: "Jones Beene" To: "vortex" Subject: Mars stems, marbels, threads Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2004 06:59:49 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0018_01C40348.9DE6E520" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53421 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0018_01C40348.9DE6E520 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable http://www.earthfiles.com/news/news.cfm?ID=3D676&category=3DScience This info makes these items look less and less like anything that was/is = living... ------=_NextPart_000_0018_01C40348.9DE6E520 Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
http://www.earthfiles.com/news/news.cfm?ID=3D676&category=3DS= cience
 
This info makes these items look less and less like = anything=20 that was/is living...
------=_NextPart_000_0018_01C40348.9DE6E520-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Mar 6 10:16:54 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i26IFSPp028896; Sat, 6 Mar 2004 10:16:50 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i26IFMaa028863; Sat, 6 Mar 2004 10:15:22 -0800 Resent-Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2004 10:15:22 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Reply-To: From: "Keith Nagel" To: Subject: RE: FW: WHAT'S NEW Friday, March 05, 2004 Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2004 13:39:30 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal X-Rcpt-To: Resent-Message-ID: <7epJOC.A.5CH.6UhSAB ultra5.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53422 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: I asked a friend of mine about this issue, he was attached to one of the diplomatic parties sent to negotiate with the North Koreans. We talked before the second gulf war, and he had this to say. "In the public media, the North Koreans bared their teeth, slammed their shoes on the table, and promised the destruction of the Satan America. In private, during negotiations, they bent over backwards to appease us. North Korea is largely a failed state, and the main issue for them is continuing to get oil and food from us to avoid another round of mass starvation. That this aid was cut off caused the initial crisis that we are now dealing with. Don't believe what you're seeing in the media about this, it's all a bunch of propaganda from both sides." I thought this position extreme, but after watching events surrounding another famous madman armed with weapons of mass destruction ready to destroy America, I find myself a bit less credulous. And of course, he was actually there talking to the North Koreans, and I wasn't. K. -----Original Message----- From: Horace Heffner [mailto:hheffner mtaonline.net] Sent: Saturday, March 06, 2004 8:34 AM To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: FW: WHAT'S NEW Friday, March 05, 2004 At 10:01 PM 3/5/4, Rick Monteverde wrote: >Parksie writes: > >>The >>only place a missile could be coming from is Russia, and that's >> why we still maintain a deterrent. > > >Has this guy ever heard of North Korea? Honolulu, among others, could be >that city. We're within range. > >- Rick So is much of Alaska, including the Alyeska Pipeline, Anchorage and my little hometown Palmer. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Mar 6 11:35:03 2004 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) id LAA29207; Sat, 6 Mar 2004 11:29:42 -0800 Resent-Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2004 11:29:42 -0800 Message-ID: <004f01c403b1$238ceef0$c27bccd1 MIKEBY3NR533HT> From: "Mike Carrell" To: References: <001b01c4038b$ac6d53c0$8837fea9 cpq> Subject: Re: Mars stems, marbels, threads Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2004 14:27:24 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Resent-Message-ID: <"5kF8d3.0.J87.cQYI01" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53423 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Jones wrote: http://www.earthfiles.com/news/news.cfm?ID=676&category=Science This info makes these items look less and less like anything that was/is living... MC: Be careful with the word "these", for the images in the link include the spherules that appear to grow on stems, and all the mundane examples are of thin mineral filaments. The spherule-on-stem is notably lacking in any 'explanatory' comment. I am looking forward with interest to 'explanations' of this as a result of some mundane mineraological process. The dance should be interesting. I predict a lot of silence, excused by the fact that the rovers were designed analyze rock, not organics. That will excuse any serious discussion of these objects. Mike Carrell From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Mar 6 15:33:28 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i26NVxOK021138; Sat, 6 Mar 2004 15:33:21 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i26NVlfw021082; Sat, 6 Mar 2004 15:31:47 -0800 Resent-Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2004 15:31:47 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <002501c403d2$f13c68a0$8837fea9 cpq> From: "Jones Beene" To: References: <001b01c4038b$ac6d53c0$8837fea9 cpq> <004f01c403b1$238ceef0$c27bccd1@MIKEBY3NR533HT> Subject: Re: Mars stems, marbles, threads Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2004 15:29:59 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ultra5.eskimo.com id i26NUIOK020651 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53424 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Mike wrote: > The spherule-on-stem is notably lacking in any > 'explanatory' comment. I am looking forward with interest to 'explanations' > of this as a result of some mundane mineraological process. The dance should be interesting. Yes. I am looking forward to more detail too, but I guess my disappointment [as to the spherule-on-stem] rests on the image of the one there which had been ground-down by the RAT (descriptive acronym, huh?). Granted, it was not a hi-rez image at all but still there was no internal structure in the image - no obvious growth rings, gills or seeds, etc. I half-expected it to show some kind of internal structure - even petrified trees show lots of structure, but again the image was not a close-up, so all hope is not lost. I'm sure there *was* life on Mars once [based on the nanobes found in Mars meteorites some time ago] but like many of us kibitzers, I was hoping for something fairly advanced or perhaps even... still living... Jones From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Mar 6 19:32:44 2004 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) id TAA12414; Sat, 6 Mar 2004 19:31:09 -0800 Resent-Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2004 19:31:09 -0800 Message-ID: <008a01c403f4$666dc530$c27bccd1 MIKEBY3NR533HT> From: "Mike Carrell" To: References: <001b01c4038b$ac6d53c0$8837fea9 cpq> <004f01c403b1$238ceef0$c27bccd1@MIKEBY3NR533HT> <002501c403d2$f13c68a0$8837fea9@cpq> Subject: Re: Mars stems, marbles, threads Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2004 22:29:24 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Resent-Message-ID: <"oB-J_3.0.w13.zTfI01" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53425 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Jones wrote: > Mike wrote: > > > The spherule-on-stem is notably lacking in any > > 'explanatory' comment. I am looking forward with interest to 'explanations' > > of this as a result of some mundane mineraological process. The dance should be interesting. > > Yes. I am looking forward to more detail too, but I guess my disappointment [as to the spherule-on-stem] rests on the image of the one there which had been ground-down by the RAT (descriptive acronym, huh?). > > Granted, it was not a hi-rez image at all but still there was no internal structure in >the image - no obvious growth rings, gills or seeds, etc. I half-expected it to show >some kind of internal structure - even petrified trees show lots of structure, but >again the image was not a close-up, so all hope is not lost. I'm sure there *was* >life on Mars once [based on the nanobes found in Mars meteorites some time ago] >but like many of us kibitzers, I was hoping for something fairly advanced or >perhaps even... still living... In this context, it is very dangerous to lay terrestrial expectations on Martian life forms. There are some exotic bacteria on earth which have very slow replication rates. The energy input on Mars may be low and life slow but persistant, and we have been there for how many days? Nobody was expecting anything like this, so 'responsible' commentary is lacking. it would take another whole cycle of instrumentation to examine these adequately. Even importing them to Earth may kill them. It was assumed that bacterial found in antartic ice cores were fossile until someone thought that maybe human lab temperatures were fatal. Sure enough, when care was taken to keep them adequately cool, they thrived just fine. Mike Carrell From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 7 02:41:59 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i27AeZOK012196; Sun, 7 Mar 2004 02:41:56 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i27AeXSp012186; Sun, 7 Mar 2004 02:40:33 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2004 02:40:33 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="============_-1133466200==_============" Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2004 01:44:56 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: Mars stems, marbles, threads Resent-Message-ID: <2PJmiC.A.W-C.hwvSAB ultra5.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53426 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: --============_-1133466200==_============ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" At 3:29 PM 3/6/4, Jones Beene wrote: >Granted, it was not a hi-rez image at all but still there was no internal >structure in the image - no obvious growth rings, gills or seeds, etc. I >half-expected it to show some kind of internal structure - even petrified >trees show lots of structure, but again the image was not a close-up, so >all hope is not lost. I'm sure there *was* life on Mars once [based on the >nanobes found in Mars meteorites some time ago] but like many of us >kibitzers, I was hoping for something fairly advanced or perhaps even... >still living... > >Jones There is no reason to expect ordinary fruit structures in a lichen fruiting body, i.e. in the perithecium. There ARE no seeds. Internal structures would not be clearly visible. They consist of microscopic mycelium filaments embedded with single cell bacteria and spores. The structure, e.g the periphysis, and the open ostiole, or apical pore, only develops when the fruiting body is ready to release spores. What you are seeing in cross section is an unripe and either frozen or petrified perithecium. In many of the photos the pre-ostiole structure (called by some a "naval") is clearly visible at the opposite end from the stem. The outer strucures certainly are clearly defined at all times, however, unless the fruiting body is damaged and "rotting" and sublimating, in which case it looks like a snowball evaporating. Attached is (again) a clip of one such decaying perithecium, in which the periphysis is clearly visible in the apical pore. It looks to me that in many cases what we see as "rocks" really are not rocks at all, but rather fozen masses of mycelium. It is essentially a glacier formed from saturated brine and which is in the form of a gel. It is (or was) alive when unfrozen. The outer crust on this "ice" normally prevents ordinary "evaporation", i.e sublimation. You can still see the root-like rhizine filling some of the holes that permeate the stuff like swiss cheeze. Here and there you can see crustose lichen growing on the surface of the frozen ice mass (or former ice mass.) There appears to be a mix of lichen-like species involved. That's the way it looks to me, anyway. I haven't seen anything that contradicts the notion that most of the suface where Opportunity is roving is comprised at least in part of a crustose lichen crust, or that just subsurface is a layer of (mycelium) ice everywhere. The "berries" certainly appear to be perithecia. One thing seems sure to me, and that is that even if the air there were breathable, it would stink to high heavens! --============_-1133466200==_============ Content-Type: image/jpeg; name="periphysis.JPG" ; x-mac-type="4A504547" ; x-mac-creator="4A565752" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="periphysis.JPG" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 /9j/4AAQSkZJRgABAQEASABIAAD//gAXQ3JlYXRlZCB3aXRoIFRoZSBHSU1Q/9sAQwAB AQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEB AQEBAQEBAQEBAQEB/8AACwgAnwB3AQEiAP/EAB4AAAICAwEBAQEAAAAAAAAAAAcIBgkE BQoDAgAB/8QAPBAAAQMCBQIEBAQFAwQDAQAAAQIDBAURAAYHEiETMQgiQVEUYXGBCSMy kRVCobHwwdHhJDNS8RcYQ2L/2gAIAQEAAD8Ar/0l1YyZnqmSYrshPXSXQjpyEp5U6Ei4 SjngE9wP2GKffHRFqdSmzIVGR1W0PSClAb6q1he8AJVwbk257fY4rrh6Iaou0wVeNleo uMKUspIjoN7EAm5eAsQq449r4zv/AIP1RlMLnz6BMhsRW9xccjJCCm20i6HTyAebi+B3 TI1Wy9W2VNNFb7UgoUjp7rKSspIso2vf54Jedcx1+NWYNUMYDptMGxZRa4aSP/Ij5/0t jAzJnnMlY+BlLhENtJsCGG+bJCT2VyOPa/y9Maym5vq8yoOQURFOOyglCEJaQFJUE7eR cX5N+D/wb8qeHzOlQjLzZV4y26a0USEpSwtpRSDvsHAsp7g8kfbBpzNrJVI2nDmVKLRn 1GnJQyXHPhnd1lqJNiQrsPXm2CB4TvEXTsqU5+BUYbn8aUbBG9hAK9q//wAik+qhxu+m LO9KPENmd9ybUXKK48sOtx4SW2oqApMlG03BVZR3EckgjDu6eaR5i1TalV7M9PkUiJMb XJS66ktJCekpV7x1qB5ST2wGs/1VrR5VZp2SZbFcqUJ0hyO0kyHEhtsqWkpkhCb7CDe/ FxhL8uZ+l6r6gyp2emk5djRmprajKSiPd1xttxsAxSu11Ap2n1+WKf8AR3M2pTeqlDyf QZFUeYqUmK2820++VoS+l1wqKviEmylIFhyQe2OpjSfwe5cq+SqRWcx0oSqwqO3KmCpo EsqDrTKwNr7TtvMtXckfa+JxmDw95PNNdhsUSnspZQpIS1Cjtp4ATfahgAnjk+vceuEv zbpTBiLqFNixqfDSQUgSYTbyXbqVw2kN8EW5uO30wk2oeiuXaZ1ZU6nUx6QVKUkRYLMc qUTcEWZ9b3JPr88B9rS9VWWwDl1pEdCiGFyYsd7qpBta+0k7QB34HAFu2CJF0fpbTCEy 6RTkGw2pVAj/ACHYNEf4cb2maL5celxzLy/BbuoFmQxCjM2INyVFDO5V+LH5kdsS3VHI 9TGSJFEofRajiMpKeizZdtpKRvQUm4/4GKTM65Tz/kufWZEhqaKf1ilx14uLaUF7gCAp 0gWJPpe/IxH9PdQ5+nk01NlDMtctRWEvMtvbSAE8B+4Tzzxbtfva9gXh/wDGXVV5ph0W oZccqEJ+Sy46uG3BYDXSU3YKUbnkEkWHoPfHSxpD4k6VnHJ8fKUejy6XHMQIdlrfYC0g NrJs60lLg4Wex5thZtX9TNK9HalLDdXp0+q1hEiQtmcszXeqgdDaPimV2vdIIvY35xU7 qFmvOupucZFQy7TTDpjnxC0O06G3FbXcoUgq+FLW64BAJF7X9MXReFfwD6c5gr0PUTK8 eNMn02VZLdlPG8NxTSeFtJT3We5Pb7YtiqlCzLSqbEpooojMxUiOFIZYQHEtNpbAs2Uk 8J3cg4ijOTavU23f+gUSQb/lIHckfb7YX/UXSKK8xJM2lvfFeboFohohZPNwlJKha4Fz b++FkmeGmg1aDLlZgeTCUkLU0H1u24VYXCQq5tb/ADgLS9pjEy7VpLPxEabAZWfhekyp OyxVe6lpuq/Hpx+5wP8ANWXVVCoMtwWyhCVgKAT6C1+wT9eR9cF+m0BMfLKoTNOEmY+2 kdYNtqLJH811jcL/AP8AJ+RwPZmnkicwpp+UUyCq6mVdU2BVe1gSOw7f2NxgEeIDQ+hZ n05mUZMdhirhlS0PJbCVuKbK3LktoCj6Xuo8f0poy94dJ7lblw6vJCmosgoSAh5HFyRa xJ9bH3w92hOi+S9OawxUq3UoEZmqPNSUfGtuOKKGNiF9NS217E3HNrD98WfZ01zydl7T x2l6XCJUq+IZa3wkNOOby26m4Cm21din+b54odz1nfWaXqjT6tnSLLiwl1Rnppmx9za4 7kuP1NoLq0gcKHIsDe45x1veD2Bo5XdBMvVmdSMurqy4sAPuOwaeXCpz4jffdFKgSEi9 yThjfAdpZVsnZcmSpipXTekymwFuO7QUTAskBSiASDybDv2Iw4szLCok1dUYlrWth1bz zMhxx5vYSbANrUUC5Pt8ucfNHqrEupKkTnokZDNhtDSG0HbdHKUADkc839zzbAE1rrgQ 6l6GqMtsqUlsoZRZRCbG5t3vzz9cKnOyXnLNsV6cw7tjeY2Q2Qki9uyVgW55JHywC69p 1WqLKjvflvPPOOApWwFpGy97pWSObn/LYh1cy3TkutOhbArAKQWUNbU34HLaUhI457jt gmZfy1Rn6Q41UHW0zpDf6UXb2lI4sEiwuPY8+vpgXVSiwok96nMHcVFQSsklXr/MRu9f fAxr2mJq7M5LknahsgHcpw8OA3F7+xPHPAwrFc0Bp1KrJqURxDrx6iygJWoLUADykjaT xbn74UnVpioMZgEKrLNPabS81BKAWE9NQSFFPTI/mPfjm/thwfw68hURnUEVLMc+PUaY +4re3UCqWylK2UJ/RJLqBYAnhHfnFl3jx0r8MRyrAq1FTRDnV5lLdOjRWm0AIfkKQ+ss IiIaUpDgbIJIKfQ84qaylT9T8lSYtPi5hlN0abGdkIix1ymkMlodNlIQh9KUgXJslAHJ 7Y7L9LUUHLGncAuNtIVIq1URcbQeFoWOyb2/9+mBfqhOU3UUJp75aYkJQV2KrbVNlVuL diR/pzhe6nAmVN5LMKpLaJP5hS44L3vceVY9b9/643sfJtMzNC/g8qaVzIaS4pSlOkku ACxPy2m/PN8Q92iVKgSXaFFe/JWNoO0mwVdQ7kG5sL4Eed6SxS40z42SlU1xN4iSVXCi brsLm/lPa/0uOcCilZayfMgPzpswmuAq2tlT3B3EAbAkp/T8/bHhEj0SlB+W/IWtxu5U kqdASOQLBQtyPb3++Admit09+qOS4CrqCiBY3N+x9PT9/wB8D6os5jqryExXlttSFpC9 oPICgOSlYPF7dzb1xvJ2n/8ADEQ5M6SXHHEErSSs9yB2JV73545+dsKN4mNIKPmyiPyo roZq0aM+YZb3pUslKlk2QBc3CR5jf+5rL0En655Jz/LoUJ2b8Kh9xDa9i0gpS2kJIKnw ojm/1GH3qWd88UGps1HUKLNqcXpOtxi+8EoYU7tSgbXXHQT1PNcAW98YFB1vocbMD/8A EI633ZCXnIccOpPTYShIWB5VJASrngDufW5x2Nycvry/TIFMYiyHUsy35BBfKgOsi/ZX uRz79vXGgrdKYrkUOrT8IsAtq6it9+mAmwtyki178/0GBI7kNcSQuUy446lKtytq3LW5 PvwDf2xGq1mljLbD3wZSzMKdrhI3rVtIAAJAPBvcdrYC2eNWWoEdiUuoMtTnCoAKa81y AB6exv3/AGwGZL71YnN1qoVNMhqTazdlpS0AB6KUU2UD6AH19cE8Ly7RaSipp+HdugFX lSfQDm6TxyecRqZUcvZkiFMVcdkuJcS8C0nk2KU2skWA+1sCuleHrMVekTqhRx1oQVvW oN7gE8nglQt9h7Y3J04pGWqPLmTHkipQLIU0pSgSpV+Qk3SLcXtgGZgqRjsqqTRU8pSt qW1ErSkKUUGyVXSLAenqOO+NCrLlDq9FlVmq8zHEdWOwVKsUhKyoBFinbcC4I9T91Prr dGy/OmZwXTWGmqYXTdthtveSkrF9rYv/ANvub+18JNqVrHUtZs1wolFpb6KXGS7Flymy EMtLcdQpBWlIRchJUQQLi3BvhhNK9Ism5TaRXq3mCJKkyGin4aQhxa2usgtkBTgWkAbQ bDv3747UYwEikxKhLqLC1vy32NpQCr8oCxtckcHjjA7zFQOk6lDtQSUPrKmUoCk2U4N5 vtP/AIkD6jjvj6hUpUKC4ykiQ44kpQD5lEk3FtxPvwTbvxbCvahZNrNGfkV6owVu04lS 9pUlAskkk2ubg7h6XFsJvnSqZLzHXYLUmMuOlDoQpPXWkAgBCv0pA7i/z9+MSTPGnrLe XokzLb9m32rkJe6ltqUngFQI57+/9cRXIEYy471GrryiElSQHFKFuT2Nz7Dse/riYx8n ZZZdlOLm/DswQVqHUdAXuBULWPPYDsfnjWU/WiXQWp9DyitL6VXaKiEr7Ai93APQ/wC+ BHmN7MtQR8fUXVIRLK1vICgASCbeVKrDjjt6+mIXETDcu1JQVtXIAIJ573tY+t+3e3f0 x61CBFbSy4ARGA6SG7kAhw2/T7C9u3r++oq+mlDzJTTSXo6AxOAU77lKbhV7Jv2Ueeb4 UrWrT7R7RrKcgU9+FEq10Fxm4U8+6CtIKVbQU2ulNhzyD9ARpFkquat09UuDHeaijapp 5crahSdhWNqVLTa9iO3cHHUtM1bpeQIDVRzW+6X0OOKaZU64lPlAUDsTdJugnm31+eDl fWqLqa88aIsokNLJYSpzdfzlCbBVh2HrYYNtIrUmmOMonOpVVFFPTbKhY7rFPluU/p9D 9x2GJrnunUbNOTnf4q4G6kyy4thCSpKVFSUhIKEeU+W55Hf1xSNrLRn8v1iW5KuiOl5Z aKPJYblEWKOe1vp64hOX9QKk3GVEZfkPNqGxpK3lrAN7GwWogdrGw+Xtbas1/MhlJeLa ktX3FSQEkg83JTyTbn73wT0VF3N1KdhRXFMvw0BMghVlKK+243ST/p6e+IPByhNpD7zo dupRJJsSfX1JNzft/wA8ZcPL1TqMtwPvqDYPlBKikggk2G7j58cd/rtTQ26W4UNlCnSD YKQDyAewV9fnz298QurOtNvmNV2yufIVvpYRdCQ0gjq3Sjyq89v1cj0+cjyUKTKmyoM3 e1PEaR0ypS7XDKjwP0jkp7c/XFM/jTyrUJupiqcioSEqdlrdYbK3ltqQ0+yT5N2ywNrg j1tbnEXy1Lz3lmPTYLc92JAZiLRujoLAKgTsuW1JueSLn049sdNmvBy3Op7VWqRKore8 JQnqAEtshKhZI5uDc8D9sLLo3MzA7mSoO5XStiIkIES/ALiX1hX6yPS3J7+5OGvOa8yR qvERVX9tSSWtu5aEpvt8oPOyxF+5NsMQc+wH8vuR6g6FVP4cBopWVAkhNh5CUdvn3GK4 9b40ipvvuVAfkKWst/Qm47cni3z+hvgK5cy6iMptaWyttRPTISTyCe/Bt9+/bBEgNvqm Fl9kBlIsSUC23ab3IHf35+R74007MMXLdSXHp+7qTlJDoQlS+UcDgA27+/y5wWcrUd7M LSZLzhbSbKs4Nl72P8xB4t87W+2JxAyX8TV4cdl5KWxuDpBFje1rm4HA/ofnja5601jQ kpdjvgvFJO4G/sfe30GF8r2XJbbJbShD9XUtJpzhUgBDKT+eLqNvMbcEg+18fVDhRmlp i1JAazD0nApaSDfy/mcoug8FPNzx88V+eKOm0SHnKLMeiCZVGIs3cAohXU6iFAbebkkJ 7D1AwimbtRatGpjgfpK4yUPspa6xDSikqPKQtCSRfgkcemOu6BpvD1W07Yd+DA6U6og3 WDwlTbdjfuO9v3tjSUnR2k5SiyQwpqJL27Wtqk3UtKr2FiLG3Ppfm5wLc1ZfYdfArcra UrIaUlexVuwspBCu1gP2+s5yrkiqy4TTkB1QhteZK1kOFwcC11qKrAW/y5wOtVNP5U9s hUZZdQDdwBRAsAL2HFvr79r4WiqLquR46GVJEhuWVJSnppJaCOfmRf6jt399lQarKq7Q b+FX+YQFKCDexPuE3uLnj6/TBmyxpnlsONVOptgyF+dsOJUo7hYnvx/v249cnOrAZcaY p6enGQUp/KHTFrjvtse2N9lynxpTUZqNPXHm2tYpWtS1H5k8WP25J9sT2pZGzCYfXnBy VG27gpR2XTbv3v2+f3tgEZtyi1PbTToEdyPMceb2uB1azcOAEhV/KORxcA/PGFF0NztB qsCoP1JBiBhwqQpLRXZRHBUVbibAi5/vivDxf5biZV1JolYnSkMoWtbqy7YtuATGATZR 22sm1rfW+FQ8RtS0izRT6DUq7IipQzF6R+EJYSpbkoqClCNtSTdPci9uAbd+tnIcWm5W yZHpsKorWJM+eApLCyLqUhfBHFwU2Iv7YFWbaHM/iTpXUnXFOhKozWxSSFquomwPIIN+ R/XC66hZHze4tqSTIcQkhTaUpPaw29vlY/74YPRlFbRCag5hQ6ywlKBCu2TuWSAvdtHH lA5WbE/vhxEaMP5rpielEStp5H60oSpRBANyAL/f2v8AYMZo8E0aUFPuNLcdWoqKHGVJ 6frxu4sb2+mNfQfC3RMsx1CQw2pwHgAAqB3EjgXPYX7W+Xa/rWtI6JFihd0JWgEtISrz D6gG4+4+gtgI1DTpuQ84ncnYkm263YfK9/v/AKnEeTQ2sqS0T26euYGDuKhvQEW59LhV 7f25xt6hqZUc1silRWlQUoHTJSndYC9zyAeBf1/1xpYtFjUt5Ls6WJTj13A4tGzolP8A LyTfdb/PX2npdqaSqLOcAb8qE7FBJHewNwD2t9+B3xXZ479D4udcnwZtQnGFWI8B52A4 VbCptDzjrhJ3JSDvSkebmw4vzjn2q+mdarkB3Lb0mVU3ID7aErY6j42tEuHloqHO6/fs CMd0Okc6bS8mxqXmikuzJkeoz5DRUhe4dZxARcoR22cD+gBtggVDItQqy280JY3plH4a DFsAY7kZJutQI3HclQHnFuPfGLT8q1oTA7mZLQgNkFKFNtK8gvxwAeE2GJEmXlSNMTEj hiOHChClkJAURa4AVYDnuRYnDl5QzbRMpUunux5bDm9IJuUH+VJ5uVe/yxvqnqnl+qTm mJBYUJACFKSEgN3T3O0evPB7fLHg5ppQKg2/XI1YYUlxBWGNzZt5VcWLh9/b98J7mPJq ZWYKkiK8Wm2lgOXUSh4c22hRt732++AFnNuFRJyYyae468CAXEl2xNwD+kW7/wDPfH9+ GbqlJ6Dqkxeo2doUyFlXBvclIPHH+dhZEyYINReXHqaApRUUjot9yLAC97c/5bnGlrFB nN1BtFTeU/DdcSr4hCLlspUkJa2I/ldNwpZ4SOcTanUqnS5rNLitobcZacUqPuHTb6YC ytL5O1xSB5wkE7j5RioX8VTMubcr5ehw6Y65JaciusRFtjY6805JW2o9JA3oIKrWtzwe xxWr4Js00HLpdTn6KWZVRZck7prC1klEYtnl1N+VW7eo7Y7JtFNR6dqlCVVMrxIciO26 626C82i3Sd6SrJXck7j7YKtSr82JEchUaIpVQacdVJa6ZCGULUQhSFqSUr3KCgQkdue2 AdnTP8mmU5/+OB1MhSVhtCUKJv3HKEj07du+EvrGdswvTvi3lONwFPn4RSVFRCgo7i4l IBQLEW3cemDIzq6afSoKJlTA8trLeAPKU27rv9f2PJIxq5PiHp1GE9xyqRlF1tvp75ba VtlIuSAXL3N/S3t8sQxP4gOXspuNw5WZGip1zphpUtISLqsACXLdyL/t2GLBdDM50bXW kiuQ5DalsNpWgsOB4vl0diUqPY2737/TGVnTJNXFVXupo+GRuPUcSEeUC9yVpH9z6exw LJqIUYTGpMTctjhBBISk25AUBt5P9f3wEhCnVGtLMKMQ3vNiHCBb5eg/z3xJJlBrK2zG Q2hlx21n96Fq2gWW1tN+HQdu4cpPI7YyMv5fipl/AyWi1IYbcWmMSoJaWhO8OB64LmxV l7SSFfpPtiq7xoRqNmzWnJ+Va643LgNRJy5zrwSlMhTE+O4lSkCwSQhSkgDvz3wO9SPD JpHmGHTHspNNQZMRjouuMoUhJ3vb1DdvCeUgDvz6e2Dt+E1qDmSuV2pZSqNVdaCNj6W1 qTyZVQWOyrdwkYv3kCfRJqn5kMyGH222mngkkBTYKiSUpINwQeffC8au5cj1dh+pfFNp DaCvoWb9E2sEkg+voL/3xWZnbP0TL0mowJENSGDZtTmxZCglRvtsLDgX4Pr39AI6/m+h Z1isw8vIeentbgpDQfKgopA/lJF7g+nHy74UHUTIupMqrlSWqhGjFJ2rUXUpICD33JSO BY8+/e2KwvEJTM3UGQ64l+U/MjuBaAh9dwpKgQDsUQOR7G1v3tp/CC8XWtVEzJCylVVv IpLr8dloPvhQU2FWV5Vt34HzP9hjtVahUPPGSGqnU1tGY7CbccsE7txbCjyki/8A6t64 RbP2WqGw8IMaR023VuB7agKJ2qsL835HFh+3Y4jUOgZHoVNU6qSTKWm//YVe5uOCFc4j bcBicXJcELfSy4gJugpICjfj1INvX9rC2N4/lV1cCbmJxgNqiwpKknkclhahc8eqB++O cbX7OZn+KKmpzNT3nKP/ABF2H1EpfUlLMibCQojYALWKz39MXer8M+kmaNJssTdPltt1 WoRIkmWkbkqBTIdDgPUdUeGgOLDFang5m6ZaY6kRagxUmY06e7FjpQSlsr6TrjqQLui/ Bv2twMdMzstNTyNAmsxPiWHoiHkPJbUogOMMqBBCT6KHIPPbCRZ0Zp0lyU0qStD6lODo lJBvuItYm/y7enuDhUdSNGqZWqLJkTI7Vih1TTgAUo8fzAG6eO1+/v6gP+CPSnJDup1V h1xtpTbEgBBkp2ot1nhwVrSnsBfnth+/FBpFppByRKmU1NNbmJjPfDLaWwpSV9O3NnTt 9hf/AHvye+IrJkmmOV2pPhuQeu6I4KkKv+aoJA239Nv19eRgifhzZP1Kq+p1BkIZUzTl zR0VtqQUoSF2O89MbAQBbcofL59r2VGatlfK0SJVH1ub4TQuCFi5aT6p47n+/wBgfmPL lVqlTTKgRVyWVrUpwK3J2gniwCSe1/2798esjIipUVCHKVvfFrpSpalA3HoBfn6dsSKj 5DmQkNIFNVFaU2pa0lKgFFIO0krT6WtY27/uBvENqc9p9kmpw46mBIWkNCMh5JfVuDjZ CWRdw/q7BJ7/ADGKP8yvZfzDUIubs00ZbPQbdmLdlxnmlbm1h4EFwIJN2uLeuB/WvxXM qaLSE0WjIkORqclURCWmpi0AbrADZuFrKJ9f7YbxzwqZGyxXWM2Cm0yS1RyzKjyG5ySo PNgtrAS0/byhdvc3+WL7fDvnyJW9JxHXJbccTC/h8KGSlXS+FLDKSm532U2i3NxxwcRL NPh3q1eYl5jhMH4kqcdQkWvbeSk259Feg+YwvcjTTM9U+Jy3LSWnH97JeUpP5CQVWWSp ISLpSbbrd/fCxzdMZGmFWqcemtrcq7xKxUmkkbVKUtwedsFvy3I+/qcLrqvmnUmZR1UZ xEt8EuhcgrdUHEk3AuG9vlA7JP172wlMzQ97UhKqfVW1FxTm5SVJCjyvcf1Ae398P34S dFmdK5aWabDZUpLjBddWUtLasrckti53X5Jt/ri9HLLE3MNIhNvVZ5SW20BUfpo6drDy 7zyRwf6Wtg2UjLlKao0kLTHjTWkpDKkrbUt/uVFQKvKRwOB/vjDy2zQmZLqZaQuoAnYe nuANj3IISP5b/wCWy8x17L2WadVarnGoUtunR2HnGUyJkVtSEpZWpO1BdbWfMm55Nsc2 3iY1s0+zvrG5Lp+aIqKTEqC2ksx5DDqPO8wpP5fXVexSbd+ObDH7XbJeVc2aWwpUbMkZ 0VilOvQ3CqGyphN3mg2AHR+pdiArkensKrtEfw98uao5oq8bNcxM6KVvvMPLQw4khuOl YsUrCeV+x9OMNFnvVljSerTMj5jz9Lqym4UacoRRGmslE/8AMSlTsRZQkgIsQTcGwPIt hxPDB4oqlGjRJ8EvigJeKEuuB5pCum4EuKcunagG6TuKrc2v79AehOqz+o1CQ/AlQZDf QSlbTM1l0ggJQoKSlSlA7vQ2IPHcYhWZ8pZki5mqFRcQP4bNCUPKbUlamQgrVcISndyV W5t98YkHQWPmGnT6pOaDlPUgnrOoT1idxCglokKUbkdu/wDTAAzT4cm3adUFIpLjkJoO /BLVGWHFK3KDnk23AHFjzcYVzIfhmlzs5OJTCdbaL5SQWCEpG5QG4qSLD15w7jXg7qlN MGp0yU6yXQFPNMIZWHSkCwcsCU2sQPfDN5H0/r1FhIp8mnMoXsCRIU9+cSBa4bKefftx +99/IyDOgGTVZVaUW4pT1WHlsNBlK+SLEpVa3JJ49TxhevEH4h9I9A9PKvm+bXqHKrMa I8pEZioxHpKHem6kbmWJReSoFKTYov6/PHGZ4s/xXs9ay5oqtAo2a6lTKK49IgR48Vxa 0uiQrptkpcQVDaVkCxtyCSfRNtPcgagJrJzVWMzSKlBqCzObjSpUdLt0pG27KSHRZSbm 447395hqX4m8+QK7lXJMmpu07LcKRGguASjZbSp7I/QtKR+lxYsFcjjvjpC8GcPSiVkH L9TiVeGalLpaHJTrrkdtZcKXEquVSOfKkD0+nfHNNqjlTV3KM2TGzJTJlRzRUosePuu+ 8UMJHVjXcaYsBs3J5Tx2vftazohqJQcuaGIynXI7MSvVOI42lV1F5t10R3bkFSbEFKgd yfqMMn4NNVtdtBc0P5knVqZU9PH5JfVDMpLiBHMlx5aQywyXbbXGxbqXsPkcXRUf8RTR TMiQJ0hunKS2yifGfZcaEhwbUuJs++ha/wAwFR22P2w4GSfFboNIp8Oozq/Tf4IBuVTF PRyF8AqBa+LDxubHg+nGIdqb+Ib4a8uzmKfHYhvxJt2YbSGHlhpQRZxQCJJPmJHKuD6f MLR/GR4d6JVUT36w1R01VW+6WEAp/mv+dJTb9XriXVH8RPQLLCmIVOzwKiZBSVJ6cc9E AhXHTlKsCCTza5/qyOnXi10T1Jjt1KjVeJUqnGYWvoqLaVFRQTY7ZKlcgc3BxUH+Ix+I orTVVQoeX33KLNq7b7TS6cXng+lsFolwncEEBQCff7Y5OtatcM0au1heXV1DMEmqZklF HXESUtv8x0Nn8zYWrWdHcAdx7jBG08/CzqVKaoWo2ZnJNVgu9N+RDkss7lSHnUfD2bbC XVkFPNuxOHEq+nukuh0OVmzUfLr8hlUN9mi0o0yW8Qp5hTLaktsrbfGySlJ7KAvc4QmV 4WleKyvnMeX4cuhUt2pxpVPjuxVRgwwl5t622aAtFignzkn1ub82E0fJdK8MOUolKrOb V/HRgxFDSXIq1JSSttYs06kixUDa39MSjPtdYzW9Kzc5S2J9VkRW4UNIDjqmXIadqVkt 3U2ClRAKk7T2AOAz4ZPBn4jNZ9SKvXczRakMj0x5E1lDYU+z0HJjzZQhBiJ3KS0toFAc un1ti3HPUDIeiWWY1CmKS6w1GS3MiSGQ06VhlvqDopcS4q7iTbgX+WKxtbhkTNzcN7Tx ibTKs5Jeu4zAeYY3nsXZLq3G0p3lXmNucYLekesIytDmQc4vNTQFLQyajCQyUWSUguKQ T+i/px2+Yx6VW6LSJTcfVGpKdqdLG7rqUiSzu2m15IW00NwA+XP7gLVzNFe1aqq4GncW U6zAGyO+02+2y4du0bHNjrauUgHao4T3MmVvE7kA1HM9YoVYVR2E7y7/ANc4nppBFxtg gWsP/K3+j7fh0+MGkUoVt/MdZfpdVZSWxGkktLDhbdQQEyFtr7jk7ft2xg+MlnP3iBYk 5qydmP4lUBTjrA+NioKEFe9QAKXFcpR7X+1rIzpxm7MeWIjKMwQlu5spD7aGpbqXSSsO bipL4bSg/pT+lJHAxYSPGBrS5Qsj0eXV6jGalyoDjTDC1OtOxo9RaDhcJj3QQkkJTfzD 1vgw+LLWDKOZ42QpWaH6q49ChpFQaXS3lxSszW1lSniUA2SL34AF/bEe/wDsJlnJmTIM nTFtuqyqsGCluMlzqQCpao/TCYqn1JTtPUUXU3T37YULVFzOGo1ZNZzi8sx5O91LBdDu xSlJKQpCkNqSQoX83PI98WVaT+H3Oj9AelrzJJLynX0WL8MghDw2gnZf39MN9oh+K7lL wp/xDRWvZWbr1UeCo8ioPRqo4uKl94upeYXDKWHFq6CkqSoBIB9+4UzDr9pL4htRZ9Sq 9KfqDElSHjFmU2WlpoOKdJCNzqVG27aL+iQbXwvuoupWk1GqTuU8lUMNuuHbO6kCTFRD Qq6kORlKdWHllaSClVgAAfXCzZw1cq2TKtCVUM5V9eXnFX/haIzTjCErRcpShCQ5a5Av uv5R2wG9Tcn5i1vjy6llCvzKfSAwh2WhSmIynghFxubkJWo+YXsCOThM8n+I/UjQjO0b KiMwT3abT5qEOpDoUFDq+ayWmrHkHsfvi9jMni6y7nXwxPs1OmGpVCqwWGEPS48oFtal JbUQsFI5vyVC2KUHPDxmyo5mfr+VlxacKu68+hLcxhkpuTYWcSoi27+b/QYZ7RyiataT M1OJmwQK9RJam9wfqqHVsNpSQQ21GaQVbtxJClHkexxOc36SU/U+lvZkypU5VBlRil9+ LHZZbaUUkuFPUklayLIIuOSCbY9dMcxZb/iOXsoZvpzdQqlMdQiJUFNOvOBtqQhbpKkK Q2kqNjYA3+2Hr1l0kyTq/ldNIpTz8OaIagVfBobTwFqI3vLI5B4+/r3Q7Kuk0Xw+OuPy FCoQ4ceSJTaw2d8gNq6J2sE7gLfqBG32PrlafVOoatZmq0uTR6enLqHXfhmlSHN3LKXG SWF2Umygr+Y2x//Z --============_-1133466200==_============ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Regards, Horace Heffner --============_-1133466200==_============-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 7 06:40:41 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i27EdIOK027558; Sun, 7 Mar 2004 06:40:39 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i27EdG7r027541; Sun, 7 Mar 2004 06:39:16 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2004 06:39:16 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <002001c40451$c0ac5cc0$8837fea9 cpq> From: "Jones Beene" To: References: Subject: Re: Mars stems, marbles, threads Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2004 06:37:43 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ultra5.eskimo.com id i27EbqOK027163 Resent-Message-ID: <1NPpV.A.PuG.TQzSAB ultra5.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53427 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Horace, > It looks to me that in many cases what we see as "rocks" really are not > rocks at all, but rather fozen masses of mycelium. It is essentially a > glacier formed from saturated brine and which is in the form of a gel. It > is (or was) alive when unfrozen. If what you say is true then it should be possible to simulate the appearance of these on earth by hard-freezing similar fruiting bodies and grinding them in half. I wouldn't doubt that someone has already done it (maybe you have been scouring the local Alaska tundra this morning for just such a simulation ;-) certainly, the interest in this from non-professionals is extraordinary... but in the mean time... Is it you opinion that some of this frozen mass of mycelium will reanimate as soon as the temperature rises to a certain range ? Jones From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 7 07:35:14 2004 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) id HAA30807; Sun, 7 Mar 2004 07:31:15 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2004 07:31:15 -0800 Message-ID: <000c01c40458$ffcc51b0$9441ccd1 MIKEBY3NR533HT> From: "Mike Carrell" To: References: <002001c40451$c0ac5cc0$8837fea9@cpq> Subject: Re: Mars stems, marbles, threads Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2004 10:29:31 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Resent-Message-ID: <"9b85t3.0.GX7.21qI01" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53428 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Jones wrote: > Horace, > > > It looks to me that in many cases what we see as "rocks" really are not > > rocks at all, but rather fozen masses of mycelium. It is essentially a > > glacier formed from saturated brine and which is in the form of a gel. It > > is (or was) alive when unfrozen. > > If what you say is true then it should be possible to simulate the appearance of these on earth by hard-freezing similar fruiting bodies and grinding them in half. I wouldn't doubt that someone has already done it (maybe you have been scouring the local Alaska tundra this morning for just such a simulation ;-) certainly, the interest in this from non-professionals is extraordinary... but in the mean time... Is it you opinion that some of this frozen mass of mycelium will reanimate as soon as the temperature rises to a certain range ? ------- MC: Don't assume that it is "frozen" and is "inaimate". The metabolism may be quite slow, and may proceed below the freezing point of normal water. Earth heat may kill it. Mike Carrell From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 7 10:19:39 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i27IIDOK015121; Sun, 7 Mar 2004 10:19:35 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i27IIBKv015105; Sun, 7 Mar 2004 10:18:11 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2004 10:18:11 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2004 09:22:26 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: Mars stems, marbles, threads Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53429 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 6:37 AM 3/7/4, Jones Beene wrote: >Horace, > >> It looks to me that in many cases what we see as "rocks" really are not >> rocks at all, but rather fozen masses of mycelium. It is essentially a >> glacier formed from saturated brine and which is in the form of a gel. It >> is (or was) alive when unfrozen. > >If what you say is true then it should be possible to simulate the >appearance of these on earth by hard-freezing similar fruiting bodies and >grinding them in half. I wouldn't doubt that someone has already done it >(maybe you have been scouring the local Alaska tundra this morning for >just such a simulation ;-) Too much snow on the gound. 8^) > certainly, the interest in this from non-professionals is >extraordinary... but in the mean time... Is it you opinion that some of >this frozen mass of mycelium will reanimate as soon as the temperature >rises to a certain range ? We this is all speculation, but it appears to me that most of the mycelia (actullay called medulla when in a large mass) is probably dead. On earth such a thing would be similar to layers of prairy piling up on top of each other, ending up as one big flat compost heap. However, on Mars, the composting doesn't go very fast due to long periods of freezing, exellent dessication protection by the mycelial sheath, and lack of micorbs to do the composting. The layers of stuff probably act like fertile soil for some species of lichen that are capable of shooting rhizinae, which are root-like structures, down into the ice. There is plenty of evidence that such structures exist or existed in the ice in the form of brown rope or string-like structures. That is a good partial explanation for why there are so many holes. In addition, if patches of crustose lichen forms on the surface of the exposed ice, it should bore down into it in a manner similar to the way rocks and pebbles bore down into ordinary glaciers - by absorbing light and radiant heat and warming up enough to increase the sublimation rate beneath themselves. Such holes, when caused by rocks or pebbles on glaciers, are called cryoconite holes. These holes in glacial ice look similar to the holes that gas bubbles leave in magma. It would be easy to mistake one for the other if (a) it was not known that one was looking at ice-like material and not rock and (b) the material were laying on its side. There is additional evidence that much of the stuff we've seen is ice-like. That is the fact that the stuff which sits in what appears to be the sandy remnants of a puddle, often casts a shadow about the rim of its base, showing an indentation in the base. This indentation mey well have been caused by the material dissolving and/or melting into the puddle. The melting rate at the base of chunks of ice in a puddle of water is increased by exposure to the liquid water. The effect would not be as great for frozen medullary material, but should still exist, especailly if the material were dead. Further, the presence of the water itself, can only be explained by the melting ice. The ancient ice is the only clearly available source of water. It looks like the craters in the vicinity of opportunity made have been made in an ice field. The entire area may be one big shallow glacier. Again, all speculation. But if correct, it means that some of the stuff is dead, and a lot of it is currently alive. The well formed "blueberries" are likely alive, and the deteriorating white ones, which look like fibrous snowballs, are likely dead. Further, if the above speculation is correct, it means water is all about and yet so far unnoticed. I wonder if that is possible? Wouldn't one of the NASA instruments detect this? It is already known for sure that large parts of Mars have water or ice just below the surface. See: It is hard to believe that the NASA folks could mistake ice for rock, or lichen for sand for that matter. That makes me think the all above ideas are completely wrong. On the other hand, there IS shallow subsurface water on Mars and crustose lichen would provide an ideal explanation as to why it has not all sublimated. It would also explain the "canals on Mars" which grow or grew in the Martian summer. It would also help explain the crust on the soil, and the white layer that is exposed in the trenches and tracks made by the landers. All very self-contradictory. It will be interesting to see the outcome. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 7 10:24:27 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i27IN2OK016460; Sun, 7 Mar 2004 10:24:23 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i27IN1YS016442; Sun, 7 Mar 2004 10:23:01 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2004 10:23:01 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2004 09:27:26 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Filaments Resent-Message-ID: <-EWalC.A.2AE.Ei2SAB ultra5.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53430 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Lots of very fine filaments can found when carefully scrutinizing: >http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/m/039/1M131647698EFF0544P2953M >2M1.JPG< >http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/m/039/1M131647578EFF0544P2953M >2M1.JPG< >http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/m/039/1M131647639EFF0544P2953M >2M1.JPG< Toggeling between the images shows them not to be artifacts, but real things in the photos. They are not quite as thick or pronounced as earlier fibers, but they can not be from the airbag because many of them clearly emerge from or enter the soil. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 7 14:27:05 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i27MPfOK018090; Sun, 7 Mar 2004 14:27:02 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i27MPd3a018074; Sun, 7 Mar 2004 14:25:39 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2004 14:25:39 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f From: Baronvolsung aol.com Message-ID: <110.2f12169d.2d7cfb6d aol.com> Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2004 17:25:49 EST Subject: Cold Fusion Improved By Using Quantum Tunneling Voltages & Resonances To: vortex-l eskimo.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1078698349" X-Mailer: 9.0 for Windows sub 5007 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53431 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: -------------------------------1078698349 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Photon-Assisted Tunneling in Electron Pumps http://216.239.37.104/search?q=cache:ZDP4OxaqvcMJ:www.boulder.nist.gov/div814/ div817b/pubs/downloads/set/patinpumps.pdf+photon+tunneling&hl=en&ie=UTF-8 "Time varying voltage sources with spectral components at frequencies corresponding to the charging energy (typically 10 GHz) will significantly increase tunneling rates, because it will generate photons of sufficient energy to overcome the charging energy barrier. " PHOTON ASSISTED TUNNELING IN QUANTUM DOTS WG VAN DER WIEL,TH ... http://216.239.37.104/search?q=cache:Fn0X-T3aCCUJ:qt.tn.tudelft.nl/publi/2002/ PAT.pdf+photon+tunneling&hl=en&ie=UTF-8 Electron-photon interaction in resonant tunneling diodes http://216.239.41.104/search?q=cache:Ggg6wmo02McJ:www.physics.rutgers.edu/~rag uado/40412.pdf+photon+tunneling&hl=en&ie=UTF-8 Baron Von Volsung, www.rhfweb.com\baron, Email: www.rhfweb.com\emailform.html President Thomas D. Clark, Email: www.rhfweb.com\emailform.html, Personal Web Page: www.rhfweb.com\personal New Age Production's Inc., www.rhfweb.com\newage Star Haven Community Services, at www.rhfweb.com\sh Radiation Health Foundation Trust at www.rhfweb.com -------------------------------1078698349 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 
 
"Time varying voltage sources with spectral components at frequencies c= orresponding to the charging energy (typically 10 GHz) will significantly in= crease tunneling rates, because it will generate photons of sufficient energ= y to overcome the charging energy barrier. "
 
 
 
 

Baron Von Volsung, www.rhfweb.com\baron, Email: www.rhfweb.com\emailform.html
President Thomas D. Clark,
Email= : www.rhfweb.com\emailform.html, Personal Web Page: www.rhfweb.com\personal
New Age Production's Inc., www.rhfweb.c= om\newage
Star Haven Community Services, at www.rhfweb.com\sh
Radiat= ion Health Foundation Trust at www.rhfweb.com
-------------------------------1078698349-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 7 14:33:30 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i27MW6OK020005; Sun, 7 Mar 2004 14:33:28 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i27MW5oC019981; Sun, 7 Mar 2004 14:32:05 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2004 14:32:05 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2004 13:36:31 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Device on Mars soil? Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53432 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: See square device looking object on which appears to be on ground near Spirit: >http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/n/061/2N131788667EFF1200P1835L >0M1.JPG< It does not appear to be behind Spirit, thus probably did not fall off Spirit? The circles on the front of the object are reminiscent of the magnetic dust collectors. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 7 14:34:27 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i27MXIOK020308; Sun, 7 Mar 2004 14:34:25 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i27MXDFs020268; Sun, 7 Mar 2004 14:33:13 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2004 14:33:13 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="============_-1133423429==_============" Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2004 13:37:47 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: Device on Mars soil? Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53433 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: --============_-1133423429==_============ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" See square device looking object on which appears to be on ground near Spirit: >http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/n/061/2N131788667EFF1200P1835L >0M1.JPG< It does not appear to be behind Spirit, thus probably did not fall off Spirit? The circles on the front of the object are reminiscent of the magnetic dust collectors. A snippet of the device is attached. --============_-1133423429==_============ Content-Type: image/jpeg; name="device.JPG" ; x-mac-type="4A504547" ; x-mac-creator="4A565752" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="device.JPG" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 /9j/4AAQSkZJRgABAQEASABIAAD//gAXQ3JlYXRlZCB3aXRoIFRoZSBHSU1Q/9sAQwAB AQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEB AQEBAQEBAQEBAQEB/8AACwgAVgBOAQEiAP/EABwAAAEFAQEBAAAAAAAAAAAAAAYEBQcI CQMCCv/EAD0QAAIBAgUCBAQDBgMJAQAAAAECAwQRAAUSITEGQQcTUWEIFCJxMoGRIzNC obHBFSXwCRckNENSgtHx4f/aAAgBAQAAPwDLjOsxSu8tKceZoJZrEbKVtvx3249/fDHT 9PxVj+bJIAb3tdwSe422H5//AJhdWZTRyxLAWaPyLvqZyQ1xpsABe4tf07bYHky2nEv0 ksFPZm9bdxff09/0ZurYahMvhOUxtJURSO7ggSfwAAaSQBuTvfDH0PV9UZhVNT5pTCKB W0ginWM6dZHKux2Avvv98SRVZfVtMsMQHlGwlJUmym/B2tuOeMDc3TlPl9RJWxSXkIBc FmIuCTwRsbm1v64qH4kU6PmWaSMrTTSwBIVjJWzKzHccMCO3qee2M9ajwI6u6y6gzWr+ SmEALNEREwvedwN0ksfpIxstneddQRRoOl6GfOHJPzvyoST5aDTdZX810IVn+n6d74JO msv6qVI6vO/OywTN+ziqAyFjYNpHlyMDs17bXAx66irczp5UgctEFIYyHYMjLdTs1yCA CL8bbXucHGQUsdNk8mbZnKsNIiszVEpbRYFS1/xHYEb24OBenzOmz6vnjyeWOshhH1PG NS7OUIsbb3G+3P8AJbXPLQjQnlwTMoAHlhXvYHtb3N79+MDVUOpqn/ljIC5tqCNuOQNp AbX3vtzjpTiuyUA55IytNfSkl113+oAamYX0/wBMB3U9HllS8M0FNGszuTIZlSQFCv0m 2n1N+d/TnAdQ9I59K8s+WrRxRuSD/wAGDcBieRa+5HIHOBzrTxNzxHpqOioHoCHLvIkU MXnB4/3ZMTKzaSNQDEgcgHEt9O+JGY5lktEtaY1+VuzF411W0In4rs3Nx7/mb9M66+y5 G+bkmgEcqLBO8wWRVWJd9AKnQ2o2uORtimfjx8SvU8dBL070DURVRdXWRY4knALoAbAv F/Glth7e2K/+Enjz4qUXUtHlE1NNLPmdSsNV5UEaeRG7PIJGBn2BZSPpOo98bNdMeG/V 2dZHQZ15hqJ6mGKRoTFI7KWhjexDSFdi54Nrj88SRSeCHiPmNHPLl9K8k0cQPlpSvqQX UBj+1UAE7c8+2B7N/BTrzK5aOq6qpZoqZJL3khaMaQna8j8Lbaw9PbDZnvSuUoyeXYsk UYcAk20oLm2kW3Fvyt22DJcizRjpyxX8tSblFJ9v+5e4778c7YYKzpPLJqoU+awRCRwo VyioYrgkOxCMxFhYAev6Z8+MfR3i9kXWKU3SPzdXl1VIhjgpY5WJR1kkBUmojUXGn+ED bH0MfBp8KvSef+BeUdVeIUEEOcM9UZ6XMVLy1TRrSkxRK0U6K/1sxLNawIvfEu5n8MPg dmMrvT9HZbQTU7MPOqqWglWbSSl1C0INj+Mat7EcG4w89PeDfhH07L/l3hTltTXgBWzN sqyOWHSpujoHoRKhB1Em4NiB64lDLJXyOdUpsgyaOi+nRE2T0BWMb/T+7C7ABTYdhtbD 1WV9VM/n05ydA346aky2GB4wB/1NCqrAk2AsRcXxCnxH1qSdFmqVKcCihklqpYokQRJ5 MaFnIUEDVttffnffGab5hSZhLKiyjWqhmIYm6sSFIsLgbbH+VuX7Kq2HL1ZFjWbUNyVR rXIP8X899uMVypaytOX08kzPPmIqJfOuSxWAfuyFYm3pfVv7Dk9o8opa7NaGszOnBMcd OQXVdtMZHJDdj6e332z8B5oqjway2np1VYYK3MCtgL7iBTwBc7fa+FVZA4Mtt/qc+1iT vf8AkfucJ6dakR3j1Dc32/re39ceZWm2L7/cW/PY7/2+2OCy6RIVILFd/cX39Ba+Ig8c qSet8OOqLAn/ACmSw32+uHcb8et//mZWXUMtPmNUCOaSDnbfUTySf0wSxRlb3G59N9sC tNktBJRVkalEqYojIjNciUswARBa+pRcm5AwpORZhIUeUtTqkaaCVYahYW/CeLev9b41 S+GGozT/AHYPSqr1KwT1zfSL2vNCtyWbjb73vttiTJKmdnljljKPqa4IHdiLelzb7Y8/ 4jFTxBAV8wswKj+Hvff1sf5i+EclV8zfQLk7bW27nYf/ADCN0ljSR1UkuNI/I3tz9vb2 5wJeIaGv8PupqeNPOnfLZESNbFnYSRXAB7gX79jfnfNGpNOubVa6kXRDFEdvwyRsVdTt +JWBDfbHVAHBMdmHqvH9sVxjzbMaSPMGqJZEPy6GIkkEvqHH1Ht6kDEX+JvxCHw/ollr JWa0QsC6jYRhhfUT2vY/fGw/+z18css8SvCerajYfMQPWSzDXG50NVQxr+EC1jf2v6bY trVVRNXI3Goki3Bux2PF/Y4bHBeVm9hbfb3/ALe2O8TCPvbcG/G4/wDfGFqyCcMosSAC Nzz74E8/ppn6azogEr5Evbj9ovO/v+n2xmFmFOY81zRm5+Ynte/PzEh25597DthNSVBB cAWt+Y5PH6b4DZun8uqRIrsrMUF0BsSL2A479sQ54keBeRddSLFmcLQUgijVZWdlQt5e ht0VjsACduDjQL4BvDmPw6ybqHKcugmWk+VLh9RZGR69WBXVY2IUHj7Y0Bmh1uWG9tyR 29j9juLY9MiKinh22t625HH+rYQ1KOguFbg7cbn/AF/YYazWSU00EZ1F6p/KiXu7AFtK 872H6YXZpX0Z6YzqlaWL500sh+XO0l2lTTta29jY33/TGT+eV7DPs1gchCKmewIA5qJO LfYe3Bx6oYS4ZrXv6mw2P+vvfDVl6xZjHOMrR5pkQGQhhJZdQCkC6kWN97n+mG6qlqaU +TmClBc21ADbnk37fbb88Wx+GbrVMszTNqNrvFWUNNCgBX6SKksTvzcDtv37bXHqaoiq jcuyRShG3YgfUCx3B2G9uLe2Ejitknmajm1okSO2rU4W7bEXIF77ev63x7p6qIq4zGvj h0g31a0NgQO1/Tva38sAGc9d9GdOzmtrs+pUWjPnR+ZPJbULg2BRt7G5NvbuMRrmnxZ+ DGX5dmkNXnuXNXVMTwxAVKKxZZAQADAe2rv/ADtiksk9B1FnNfnuWS+fSVssjREOzrYz O4I+lQLq68Abeg4MKKArEBbgc7fpfv3/ACAOAhfHrwv6XycyLmGX0lSHmaoaeSN7w3DJ sINtztub78WtiJ6XxTyzxTzwR9P1EFdTrIFaSk06RZnjJ2VOCLcHc98NXjv1D174a9I0 medDVBp8wikneoJieUyJHAjRoFEsdiHYn6iRjOWo+On4naz5ym/xcB6UyRx2o2B+mQxq Nq2+2k8+uAvMvi1+KnqWFaZ8/wAxjELtJfLxVUbtqAXTI8WYqXUdgSQDuPTA2PFX4p82 JWLNusJjJ2hzLMVvf0/zQAYUwZX8UWfrUrNL1k/noFZZ6/MJQwLA2S+Ztpa97tbjbbDt 0/4I+N7dR5LU54/UIohWI9UJait0pGY3JL6qxha5AOx3GNyfDmhp6HpXLMtSNi9HR07z 1DMH1yNDCkiksNepXB1XJ3POJDo4hPqWC8undittrG3fYW42xTDM/DLJMzgqUqULLDDr YBiNQNhb8B9uR22xy6Dy3JumqpqTKKJqaRnIMupCL62JP0orbkE83435xYKbpOm6mySv ps3cVMUtMRGrFiEZmUE2cMLEbfSAfviBKb4Zeilkqp/l4S0jyMf/ACkLW/c+pwT0Xw19 GUkKyxU0OqQsGuLiwsRb9ltzxuORgsyvwR6WoHV1poTuOEUbg87xfniQaXoLIqFQYqWI FQNwq9vbQBf3OFr9O5TKLfKRgx8HQn2HCb44pKYJFpqcCJIW1EAAawbix06b8cHbj0wT UyVc8YaGaOEdwEIJt6lT/r1x/9k= --============_-1133423429==_============ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Regards, Horace Heffner --============_-1133423429==_============-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 7 14:54:19 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i27MqsOK028125; Sun, 7 Mar 2004 14:54:15 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i27Mqrgw028104; Sun, 7 Mar 2004 14:52:53 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2004 14:52:53 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2004 13:57:19 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Device on Mars soil? Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53434 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: I was wrong about the square device being ahead of Spirit. You can see that it is to the rear and to the port side in navcam photo here: >http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/n/061/2N131788482EFF1200P1835R >0M1.HTML< (but it is obscured in the matching left view.) The square device looking object on which appears to be on ground near Spirit was originally noted in navcam photo: >http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/n/061/2N131788667EFF1200P1835L >0M1.JPG< but is also in matching navcam photo: >http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/n/061/2N131788667EFF1200P1835R >0M1.JPG< It is in 3 photos, so it is no illusion. Wonder if it fell off Spirit? Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 7 17:27:37 2004 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) id RAA31312; Sun, 7 Mar 2004 17:25:41 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2004 17:25:41 -0800 Message-ID: <404BCAB6.7070306 rtpatlanta.com> Date: Sun, 07 Mar 2004 20:21:58 -0500 From: Terry Blanton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Device on Mars soil? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"Onfwe1.0.Bf7.KkyI01" mx1> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53435 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Horace Heffner wrote: >I was wrong about the square device being ahead of Spirit. > Kewl, Horace! I'm sure it's mosaic tile from some ancient martian bath house. We're probably looking at the backside where the mortar or adhesive was attached. Seriously, if it fell off Spirit, wouldn't we likely see wheel tracks in the image? From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 7 18:16:36 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i282FCOK018612; Sun, 7 Mar 2004 18:16:30 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i282FAhj018595; Sun, 7 Mar 2004 18:15:10 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2004 18:15:10 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2004 17:19:51 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: Device on Mars soil? Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53436 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 8:21 PM 3/7/4, Terry Blanton wrote: >Horace Heffner wrote: > >>I was wrong about the square device being ahead of Spirit. >> > >Kewl, Horace! I'm sure it's mosaic tile from some ancient martian bath >house. We're probably looking at the backside where the mortar or >adhesive was attached. > >Seriously, if it fell off Spirit, wouldn't we likely see wheel tracks in >the image? Not necessarily. If you carefully look at all the navcam photos you can see that the wheel tracks are just barely to the left, outside the range of the photo: >http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/n/061/2N131788482EFF1200P1835R >0M1.HTML< It appears the square object is just about under the far (port) edge of the solar panels. It might have dropped off the rover and bounced on a wheel or something. Very unlikely, but the other alternatives are hard to believe too. One thing very notable is the lack of any impact marks or soil disruption around the object. It certainly couldn't have fallen very far, if it did fall. It seems very unlikely that it fell off during the landing sequence. Maybe it is the tip of a subsurface object? Or ... maybe there really is a bathouse just over the rim of the crater. 8^) Perhaps it is a just a martian probe broadcasting this historic event to all of Mars. 8^) The press is everywhere! 8^)) Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 7 18:39:59 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i282cZOK025041; Sun, 7 Mar 2004 18:39:56 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i282cYwo025030; Sun, 7 Mar 2004 18:38:34 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2004 18:38:34 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2004 17:43:04 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: Device on Mars soil? Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53437 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Arg! It's an illusion. The square is not on the ground, but rather on the solar panel. See old navcam photo: >http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/n/052/2N130984475EFF1120P1936L >0M1.JPG< Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 7 19:01:44 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2830IOK001327; Sun, 7 Mar 2004 19:01:40 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2830HF7001316; Sun, 7 Mar 2004 19:00:17 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2004 19:00:17 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2004 18:04:47 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: Device on Mars soil? Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53438 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: I can't believe I fell for that "illusion." It's not even very good illusion. the tile moves with respect to the soil background when perspective changes. It clearly was mounted on the solar panel. The only thing that faked me out was the fact that the greyscale value for the solar panel around the tile was so near to that of the soil. I should have looked more carefully. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 7 20:08:58 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2847gOK020933; Sun, 7 Mar 2004 20:08:55 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2847dPL020920; Sun, 7 Mar 2004 20:07:39 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2004 20:07:39 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <20040308040638.7230.qmail web11707.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2004 20:06:38 -0800 (PST) From: alexander hollins Subject: Re: Device on Mars soil? To: vortex-l eskimo.com In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53439 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: thats... not on the ground. its on spirit. you can tell becuase its surrounded on all sides by the uniform texture that says spirit, not dirt. --- Horace Heffner wrote: > At 8:21 PM 3/7/4, Terry Blanton wrote: > >Horace Heffner wrote: > > > >>I was wrong about the square device being ahead of > Spirit. > >> > > > >Kewl, Horace! I'm sure it's mosaic tile from some > ancient martian bath > >house. We're probably looking at the backside > where the mortar or > >adhesive was attached. > > > >Seriously, if it fell off Spirit, wouldn't we > likely see wheel tracks in > >the image? > > > Not necessarily. If you carefully look at all the > navcam photos you can > see that the wheel tracks are just barely to the > left, outside the range of > the photo: > > >http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/n/061/2N131788482EFF1200P1835R > >0M1.HTML< > > It appears the square object is just about under the > far (port) edge of the > solar panels. It might have dropped off the rover > and bounced on a wheel > or something. Very unlikely, but the other > alternatives are hard to > believe too. One thing very notable is the lack of > any impact marks or > soil disruption around the object. It certainly > couldn't have fallen very > far, if it did fall. It seems very unlikely that it > fell off during the > landing sequence. > > Maybe it is the tip of a subsurface object? Or ... > maybe there really is > a bathouse just over the rim of the crater. 8^) > > Perhaps it is a just a martian probe broadcasting > this historic event to > all of Mars. 8^) The press is everywhere! 8^)) > > Regards, > > Horace Heffner > > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Search - Find what you’re looking for faster http://search.yahoo.com From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 7 21:45:34 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i285i8OK013663; Sun, 7 Mar 2004 21:45:30 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i285i2OS013597; Sun, 7 Mar 2004 21:44:02 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2004 21:44:02 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <002801c404d0$3da7eae0$6401a8c0 Craig> From: "SnowDog" To: Subject: Big Martian Rock Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2004 23:42:40 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53440 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: This is the rock Humphrey, color-corrected the best that I can without the calibration data. http://69.57.146.76/golddirectory/mars/mars.htm They brushed three areas of the rock and then ran the APX on it. It looks like a big piece of iron, covered by dust. More on the PanCam: I found a discussion group concentrating on the same problem that we were on last week, where the calibration data with the images being released by JPL are not included with the images. The group found someone at NASA to answer some questions about the calibration data. Basically, he said, the images are the only data being released live. All the other data, including the calibration data, will be released in a few months. I think he also said that this was the first time they decided to stream the images to the web as soon as they received them. Maybe next time they will do it a bit differently, but for this mission, the calibration data comes later. Craig Haynie From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 7 22:33:24 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i286VwOK028027; Sun, 7 Mar 2004 22:33:19 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i286VvSU028014; Sun, 7 Mar 2004 22:31:57 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2004 22:31:57 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Reply-To: From: "Keith Nagel" To: Subject: RE: Mars stems, marbles, threads Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 01:56:28 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <002501c403d2$f13c68a0$8837fea9 cpq> X-Rcpt-To: Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53441 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: This 3D image shows a ground down spherule >http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/press/opportunity/20040305a/10-sg-03 -mckittrick-B041R1.jpg< The horizontal strips are due to the RAT cutting tool, but notice the inclusions? The spherule is really stuck in there as well, I'd sort of expect it to rotate in the hole but it didn't. It's probably the case that there was a long period where very concentrated salt solution evaporated and condensed, I could imaging that process fueling the growth of the spherules. I would call these protolife processes as they're inorganic but mimic life processes. The line between living and nonliving is a porous border, far from a sharp boundary. K. -----Original Message----- From: Jones Beene [mailto:jonesb9 pacbell.net] Sent: Saturday, March 06, 2004 6:30 PM To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Mars stems, marbles, threads Mike wrote: > The spherule-on-stem is notably lacking in any > 'explanatory' comment. I am looking forward with interest to 'explanations' > of this as a result of some mundane mineraological process. The dance should be interesting. Yes. I am looking forward to more detail too, but I guess my disappointment [as to the spherule-on-stem] rests on the image of the one there which had been ground-down by the RAT (descriptive acronym, huh?). Granted, it was not a hi-rez image at all but still there was no internal structure in the image - no obvious growth rings, gills or seeds, etc. I half-expected it to show some kind of internal structure - even petrified trees show lots of structure, but again the image was not a close-up, so all hope is not lost. I'm sure there *was* life on Mars once [based on the nanobes found in Mars meteorites some time ago] but like many of us kibitzers, I was hoping for something fairly advanced or perhaps even... still living... Jones From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 7 22:38:15 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i286b5OK029806; Sun, 7 Mar 2004 22:38:13 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i286b3MT029783; Sun, 7 Mar 2004 22:37:03 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2004 22:37:03 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="============_-1133394396==_============" Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2004 21:41:40 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: Big Martian Rock Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53442 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: --============_-1133394396==_============ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" At 11:42 PM 3/7/4, SnowDog wrote: >This is the rock Humphrey, color-corrected the best that I can without the >calibration data. > >http://69.57.146.76/golddirectory/mars/mars.htm Nice rendering. Thanks for posting. Hey, what's that two leafed sprout doing coming up out of the ground at 958,663? 8^) Note its shadow. Clip of it attached. >I found a discussion group concentrating on the same problem that we were on >last week, where the calibration data with the images being released by JPL >are not included with the images. The group found someone at NASA to answer >some questions about the calibration data. Basically, he said, the images >are the only data being released live. All the other data, including the >calibration data, will be released in a few months. I think he also said >that this was the first time they decided to stream the images to the web as >soon as they received them. Maybe next time they will do it a bit >differently, but for this mission, the calibration data comes later. It has been a great coup to distribute the photos right away. It would be a public relations blunder now to do any differently - unless of course they want many of their most interested supporters to turn on them. It is after all public data obtained with public money. There is an implied duty and there should be a formal policy to disclose it promptlly, especially when there is such a great public interest. Can you imagine reverting to an incompetent level of information distribution after having shown live space missions on TV? --============_-1133394396==_============ Content-Type: image/jpeg; name="sprout.JPG" ; x-mac-type="4A504547" ; x-mac-creator="4A565752" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="sprout.JPG" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 /9j/4AAQSkZJRgABAQEASABIAAD//gAXQ3JlYXRlZCB3aXRoIFRoZSBHSU1Q/9sAQwAI BgYHBgUIBwcHCQkICgwUDQwLCwwZEhMPFB0aHx4dGhwcICQuJyAiLCMcHCg3KSwwMTQ0 NB8nOT04MjwuMzQy/9sAQwEJCQkMCwwYDQ0YMiEcITIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIy MjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIy/8AAEQgAJAAkAwEiAAIRAQMRAf/E ABoAAAIDAQEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAFAwQGAgf/xAAkEAACAgICAgEFAQAAAAAAAAABAgAD BBESIQUGMRMiQVFx8f/EABgBAQADAQAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAMCBAUB/8QAHBEAAwADAQEB AAAAAAAAAAAAAAECAxEhMTJB/9oADAMBAAIRAxEAPwC5hWLYnz+Y6SpRQGB/syHrWUL7 ODnR3NDlZBZvpVnodnUzYjpuZMi1w6exGs0rDcsD7lAMWI1VJ3xZj/ZervRk5INn8iSy Trw5jra6WOQXqEqHNXfY0YQtCbMP6fU4d7Ts/wCx75Ly1HjhzZGZ260DFnrJVm4KCO41 zcCt2DuuyT0DLTaTKsS2hPR7mjWlHp4r+zqaDB8hh5I5LZon5G4rPh6rhp6Qg/epZwPB 1Y9hatm7+dmHbTFiWh4MVLByHYMJLVUa6wocQgjcPP8A1611c6M0TOzLsnsQhFv0PH8k +K5sYBuxG1agDoQhCYn4SnqEISZA/9k= --============_-1133394396==_============ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Regards, Horace Heffner --============_-1133394396==_============-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 7 22:55:49 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i286sXOK002043; Sun, 7 Mar 2004 22:55:46 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i286sRLw001988; Sun, 7 Mar 2004 22:54:27 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2004 22:54:27 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2004 21:59:20 -0900 To: From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: RE: Mars stems, marbles, threads Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53443 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 1:56 AM 3/8/4, Keith Nagel wrote: >This 3D image shows a ground down spherule > >>http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/press/opportunity/20040305a/10-sg-03 >-mckittrick-B041R1.jpg< > >The horizontal strips are due to the RAT cutting tool, >but notice the inclusions? The spherule is really >stuck in there as well, I'd sort of expect it to >rotate in the hole but it didn't. [snip] Could be just frozen in place. 8^) In the original photos I thought the central stripes looked like cutter marks too. However, in this more detailed photo, it is clear that they are not. If you look carefully, you can see that there are some complicated patterns in the central part of the berry, not in parallel with the grinder motion, including what looks to be the cross section of some spiraling fibers or structures. They can possibly be made more visible by playing with contrast. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 8 02:42:35 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i28AfTOK017220; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 02:42:29 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i28AfS5G017205; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 02:41:28 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 02:41:28 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: rick+highsurf.com mail.highsurf.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 00:40:29 -1000 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Rick Monteverde Subject: Barbells, tadpoles & USB Content-Type: multipart/Related; boundary="============_-1133380061==_mr============" ; type="text/html" X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53444 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: --============_-1133380061==_mr============ Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="============_-1133380061==_ma============" --============_-1133380061==_ma============ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" I was hoping someone would have commented on this image by now: >http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/p/062/2P131868398EFF12BO >P2313L2M1.JPG< What is up with all those dark little markings on the soil? In the lower left there's some barbells, and if you look around, there's lots of tadpole or barbell shaped dark markings - basically spots with tails that sometimes connect to other spots. Tiny sinkholes from evaporating ices? Leaking dark stuff? Fungus colonies? There's even a USB symbol in the upper left near where the big crack in the large rock submerges into the soil. Maybe "they" are trying to communicate with the ugly-bag-of-mostly-silicon that's rolling over their tiny cities? What the heck would make those odd markings? The image is from the the near-infrared L2, so they're either colder or more (infra) red. The barbell marks can be seen in the same positions in another image, so apparently they're really there in the soil, I think. If that were my rover, I'd hold out the microscope and take a closer look. - Rick -------------- images attached -------------- barbells - - USB symbol -- -------------- end images ---------------- --============_-1133380061==_ma============ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Barbells, tadpoles & USB
I was hoping someone would have commented on this image by now:

>http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/p/062/2P131868398EFF12BOP2313L2M1.JPG<

What is up with all those dark little markings on the soil? In the lower left there's some barbells, and if you look around, there's lots of tadpole or barbell shaped dark markings - basically spots with tails that sometimes connect to other spots. Tiny sinkholes from evaporating ices? Leaking dark stuff? Fungus colonies? There's even a USB symbol in the upper left near where the big crack in the large rock submerges into the soil. Maybe "they" are trying to communicate with the ugly-bag-of-mostly-silicon that's rolling over their tiny cities?

What the heck would make those odd markings? The image is from the the near-infrared L2, so they're either colder or more (infra) red. The barbell marks can be seen in the same positions in another image, so apparently they're really there in the soil, I think. If that were my rover, I'd hold out the microscope and take a closer look.

- Rick


-------------- images attached --------------
barbells - -
 


USB symbol --

-------------- end images ----------------
--============_-1133380061==_ma============-- --============_-1133380061==_mr============ Content-Id: Content-Type: image/jpeg; name="barbells.jpg" ; x-mac-type="4A504547" ; x-mac-creator="3842494D" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="barbells.jpg" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 /9j/4AAQSkZJRgABAgEASABIAAD/7QYcUGhvdG9zaG9wIDMuMAA4QklNA+kAAAAAAHgA FQAAAEgASAAAAAADGAJkAAAAAAMYAmT/AgMYAmQAAQAAAEgASAAAAAADGAJkAWgAMAtA Q4AATgABAQEAAAABJw8AAQABAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAUHBkZgBkAAAAAAAAIAAAAAAAAIQQ AAACAAEAZMwAVmU3Q1YrU1I4QklNA+0AAAAAABAASAAAAAEAAgBIAAAAAQACOEJJTQQN AAAAAAAEAAAAeDhCSU0D8wAAAAAACAAAAAAAAAAAOEJJTQQKAAAAAAABAAA4QklNJxAA AAAAAAoAAQAAAAAAAAACOEJJTQP1AAAAAABIAC9mZgABAGxmZgAGAAAAAAABAC9mZgAB AKGZmgAGAAAAAAABADIAAAABAFoAAAAGAAAAAAABADUAAAABAC0AAAAGAAAAAAABOEJJ TQP4AAAAAABwAAD/////////////////////////////A+gAAAAA//////////////// /////////////wPoAAAAAP////////////////////////////8D6AAAAAD///////// ////////////////////A+gAADhCSU0ECAAAAAAAEAAAAAEAAAJAAAACQAAAAAA4QklN BBQAAAAAAAQAAAADOEJJTQQMAAAAAAQHAAAAAQAAAC0AAAAzAAAAiAAAGxgAAAPrABgA Af/Y/+AAEEpGSUYAAQIBAEgASAAA/+4ADkFkb2JlAGSAAAAAAf/bAIQADAgICAkIDAkJ DBELCgsRFQ8MDA8VGBMTFRMTGBEMDAwMDAwRDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwM DAwMDAENCwsNDg0QDg4QFA4ODhQUDg4ODhQRDAwMDAwREQwMDAwMDBEMDAwMDAwMDAwM DAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwM/8AAEQgAMwAtAwEiAAIRAQMRAf/dAAQAA//EAT8AAAEF AQEBAQEBAAAAAAAAAAMAAQIEBQYHCAkKCwEAAQUBAQEBAQEAAAAAAAAAAQACAwQFBgcI CQoLEAABBAEDAgQCBQcGCAUDDDMBAAIRAwQhEjEFQVFhEyJxgTIGFJGhsUIjJBVSwWIz NHKC0UMHJZJT8OHxY3M1FqKygyZEk1RkRcKjdDYX0lXiZfKzhMPTdePzRieUpIW0lcTU 5PSltcXV5fVWZnaGlqa2xtbm9jdHV2d3h5ent8fX5/cRAAICAQIEBAMEBQYHBwYFNQEA AhEDITESBEFRYXEiEwUygZEUobFCI8FS0fAzJGLhcoKSQ1MVY3M08SUGFqKygwcmNcLS RJNUoxdkRVU2dGXi8rOEw9N14/NGlKSFtJXE1OT0pbXF1eX1VmZ2hpamtsbW5vYnN0dX Z3eHl6e3x//aAAwDAQACEQMRAD8A6t1zX2QNGsHu3RBKI26xrSAf9yxD1S0W7TWG/uuc YB8VdrvLh7TDTrHj3SU32PIDpPH0QPD+XuDm/wCYo+1zZkbfLTX4ElBqu9RkESeFXzrf SrAqPu7AawkpPZa181GZBEkDy4/zUv0fq7dNm2OPzvpbkHBeXsD7uTpCt+nRt3dklP8A /9Au/wBXIm8FrvpMAgj+q7+ytWva1rXRs28u7LErpfXeGuc46A6DT4FXLWl1PptkDy5E /FJTpnKdvDWHXvoj0Ma0y4gk/P8AArEx8iio+g18u7q/XmNB2nVJTou9Bo027u4GilLd u3bpys1+SJ/RGX+HH/nSl9sHoxLPUmPonnmPpJKf/9G1jVW7vUd9E+XHyVfIzj6zqamm RoHHhbtTXNdtcAJOiDmYjAze0AEcGElOMzFFZda0/pHCSVVquvZc+zIJhn4/ctTlpdtE fvfBUrmsyHS2aw3XUcx8ElL4/VbbiWD9Cw/nRJIWt+r/AGWfW93MxquasOQ97orMdnRC j62VsLNdsx+CSn//0t8fTbM/2+ef5KbP27ROz/pfwXhiSSn2S/b6TvoRGsbo/tIdG3aI 9OIHEwvH0klPrHt+0O/m5jvP/QVX2x/g+f5X7y8xSSU//9kAOEJJTQQGAAAAAAAHAAYA AAABAQD/4gxYSUNDX1BST0ZJTEUAAQEAAAxITGlubwIQAABtbnRyUkdCIFhZWiAHzgAC AAkABgAxAABhY3NwTVNGVAAAAABJRUMgc1JHQgAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA9tYAAQAAAADT LUhQICAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA ABFjcHJ0AAABUAAAADNkZXNjAAABhAAAAGx3dHB0AAAB8AAAABRia3B0AAACBAAAABRy WFlaAAACGAAAABRnWFlaAAACLAAAABRiWFlaAAACQAAAABRkbW5kAAACVAAAAHBkbWRk AAACxAAAAIh2dWVkAAADTAAAAIZ2aWV3AAAD1AAAACRsdW1pAAAD+AAAABRtZWFzAAAE DAAAACR0ZWNoAAAEMAAAAAxyVFJDAAAEPAAACAxnVFJDAAAEPAAACAxiVFJDAAAEPAAA CAx0ZXh0AAAAAENvcHlyaWdodCAoYykgMTk5OCBIZXdsZXR0LVBhY2thcmQgQ29tcGFu eQAAZGVzYwAAAAAAAAASc1JHQiBJRUM2MTk2Ni0yLjEAAAAAAAAAAAAAABJzUkdCIElF QzYxOTY2LTIuMQAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAWFlaIAAAAAAAAPNRAAEAAAABFsxYWVogAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAFhZ WiAAAAAAAABvogAAOPUAAAOQWFlaIAAAAAAAAGKZAAC3hQAAGNpYWVogAAAAAAAAJKAA AA+EAAC2z2Rlc2MAAAAAAAAAFklFQyBodHRwOi8vd3d3LmllYy5jaAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA FklFQyBodHRwOi8vd3d3LmllYy5jaAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABkZXNjAAAAAAAAAC5JRUMgNjE5NjYtMi4xIERlZmF1bHQg UkdCIGNvbG91ciBzcGFjZSAtIHNSR0IAAAAAAAAAAAAAAC5JRUMgNjE5NjYtMi4xIERl ZmF1bHQgUkdCIGNvbG91ciBzcGFjZSAtIHNSR0IAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA ZGVzYwAAAAAAAAAsUmVmZXJlbmNlIFZpZXdpbmcgQ29uZGl0aW9uIGluIElFQzYxOTY2 LTIuMQAAAAAAAAAAAAAALFJlZmVyZW5jZSBWaWV3aW5nIENvbmRpdGlvbiBpbiBJRUM2 MTk2Ni0yLjEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHZpZXcAAAAAABOk/gAUXy4A EM8UAAPtzAAEEwsAA1yeAAAAAVhZWiAAAAAAAEwJVgBQAAAAVx/nbWVhcwAAAAAAAAAB AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAo8AAAACc2lnIAAAAABDUlQgY3VydgAAAAAAAAQAAAAA BQAKAA8AFAAZAB4AIwAoAC0AMgA3ADsAQABFAEoATwBUAFkAXgBjAGgAbQByAHcAfACB AIYAiwCQAJUAmgCfAKQAqQCuALIAtwC8AMEAxgDLANAA1QDbAOAA5QDrAPAA9gD7AQEB BwENARMBGQEfASUBKwEyATgBPgFFAUwBUgFZAWABZwFuAXUBfAGDAYsBkgGaAaEBqQGx AbkBwQHJAdEB2QHhAekB8gH6AgMCDAIUAh0CJgIvAjgCQQJLAlQCXQJnAnECegKEAo4C mAKiAqwCtgLBAssC1QLgAusC9QMAAwsDFgMhAy0DOANDA08DWgNmA3IDfgOKA5YDogOu A7oDxwPTA+AD7AP5BAYEEwQgBC0EOwRIBFUEYwRxBH4EjASaBKgEtgTEBNME4QTwBP4F DQUcBSsFOgVJBVgFZwV3BYYFlgWmBbUFxQXVBeUF9gYGBhYGJwY3BkgGWQZqBnsGjAad Bq8GwAbRBuMG9QcHBxkHKwc9B08HYQd0B4YHmQesB78H0gflB/gICwgfCDIIRghaCG4I ggiWCKoIvgjSCOcI+wkQCSUJOglPCWQJeQmPCaQJugnPCeUJ+woRCicKPQpUCmoKgQqY Cq4KxQrcCvMLCwsiCzkLUQtpC4ALmAuwC8gL4Qv5DBIMKgxDDFwMdQyODKcMwAzZDPMN DQ0mDUANWg10DY4NqQ3DDd4N+A4TDi4OSQ5kDn8Omw62DtIO7g8JDyUPQQ9eD3oPlg+z D88P7BAJECYQQxBhEH4QmxC5ENcQ9RETETERTxFtEYwRqhHJEegSBxImEkUSZBKEEqMS wxLjEwMTIxNDE2MTgxOkE8UT5RQGFCcUSRRqFIsUrRTOFPAVEhU0FVYVeBWbFb0V4BYD FiYWSRZsFo8WshbWFvoXHRdBF2UXiReuF9IX9xgbGEAYZRiKGK8Y1Rj6GSAZRRlrGZEZ txndGgQaKhpRGncanhrFGuwbFBs7G2MbihuyG9ocAhwqHFIcexyjHMwc9R0eHUcdcB2Z HcMd7B4WHkAeah6UHr4e6R8THz4faR+UH78f6iAVIEEgbCCYIMQg8CEcIUghdSGhIc4h +yInIlUigiKvIt0jCiM4I2YjlCPCI/AkHyRNJHwkqyTaJQklOCVoJZclxyX3JicmVyaH Jrcm6CcYJ0kneierJ9woDSg/KHEooijUKQYpOClrKZ0p0CoCKjUqaCqbKs8rAis2K2kr nSvRLAUsOSxuLKIs1y0MLUEtdi2rLeEuFi5MLoIuty7uLyQvWi+RL8cv/jA1MGwwpDDb MRIxSjGCMbox8jIqMmMymzLUMw0zRjN/M7gz8TQrNGU0njTYNRM1TTWHNcI1/TY3NnI2 rjbpNyQ3YDecN9c4FDhQOIw4yDkFOUI5fzm8Ofk6Njp0OrI67zstO2s7qjvoPCc8ZTyk POM9Ij1hPaE94D4gPmA+oD7gPyE/YT+iP+JAI0BkQKZA50EpQWpBrEHuQjBCckK1QvdD OkN9Q8BEA0RHRIpEzkUSRVVFmkXeRiJGZ0arRvBHNUd7R8BIBUhLSJFI10kdSWNJqUnw SjdKfUrESwxLU0uaS+JMKkxyTLpNAk1KTZNN3E4lTm5Ot08AT0lPk0/dUCdQcVC7UQZR UFGbUeZSMVJ8UsdTE1NfU6pT9lRCVI9U21UoVXVVwlYPVlxWqVb3V0RXklfgWC9YfVjL WRpZaVm4WgdaVlqmWvVbRVuVW+VcNVyGXNZdJ114XcleGl5sXr1fD19hX7NgBWBXYKpg /GFPYaJh9WJJYpxi8GNDY5dj62RAZJRk6WU9ZZJl52Y9ZpJm6Gc9Z5Nn6Wg/aJZo7GlD aZpp8WpIap9q92tPa6dr/2xXbK9tCG1gbbluEm5rbsRvHm94b9FwK3CGcOBxOnGVcfBy S3KmcwFzXXO4dBR0cHTMdSh1hXXhdj52m3b4d1Z3s3gReG54zHkqeYl553pGeqV7BHtj e8J8IXyBfOF9QX2hfgF+Yn7CfyN/hH/lgEeAqIEKgWuBzYIwgpKC9INXg7qEHYSAhOOF R4Wrhg6GcobXhzuHn4gEiGmIzokziZmJ/opkisqLMIuWi/yMY4zKjTGNmI3/jmaOzo82 j56QBpBukNaRP5GokhGSepLjk02TtpQglIqU9JVflcmWNJaflwqXdZfgmEyYuJkkmZCZ /JpomtWbQpuvnByciZz3nWSd0p5Anq6fHZ+Ln/qgaaDYoUehtqImopajBqN2o+akVqTH pTilqaYapoum/adup+CoUqjEqTepqaocqo+rAqt1q+msXKzQrUStuK4trqGvFq+LsACw dbDqsWCx1rJLssKzOLOutCW0nLUTtYq2AbZ5tvC3aLfguFm40blKucK6O7q1uy67p7wh vJu9Fb2Pvgq+hL7/v3q/9cBwwOzBZ8Hjwl/C28NYw9TEUcTOxUvFyMZGxsPHQce/yD3I vMk6ybnKOMq3yzbLtsw1zLXNNc21zjbOts83z7jQOdC60TzRvtI/0sHTRNPG1EnUy9VO 1dHWVdbY11zX4Nhk2OjZbNnx2nba+9uA3AXcit0Q3ZbeHN6i3ynfr+A24L3hROHM4lPi 2+Nj4+vkc+T85YTmDeaW5x/nqegy6LzpRunQ6lvq5etw6/vshu0R7ZzuKO6070DvzPBY 8OXxcvH/8ozzGfOn9DT0wvVQ9d72bfb794r4Gfio+Tj5x/pX+uf7d/wH/Jj9Kf26/kv+ 3P9t////7gAOQWRvYmUAZEAAAAAB/9sAhAACAgICAgICAgICAwICAgMEAwICAwQFBAQE BAQFBgUFBQUFBQYGBwcIBwcGCQkKCgkJDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMAQMDAwUEBQkGBgkN CgkKDQ8ODg4ODw8MDAwMDA8PDAwMDAwMDwwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwM DAz/wAARCAAzAC0DAREAAhEBAxEB/90ABAAG/8QBogAAAAcBAQEBAQAAAAAAAAAABAUD AgYBAAcICQoLAQACAgMBAQEBAQAAAAAAAAABAAIDBAUGBwgJCgsQAAIBAwMCBAIGBwME AgYCcwECAxEEAAUhEjFBUQYTYSJxgRQykaEHFbFCI8FS0eEzFmLwJHKC8SVDNFOSorJj c8I1RCeTo7M2F1RkdMPS4ggmgwkKGBmElEVGpLRW01UoGvLj88TU5PRldYWVpbXF1eX1 ZnaGlqa2xtbm9jdHV2d3h5ent8fX5/c4SFhoeIiYqLjI2Oj4KTlJWWl5iZmpucnZ6fkq OkpaanqKmqq6ytrq+hEAAgIBAgMFBQQFBgQIAwNtAQACEQMEIRIxQQVRE2EiBnGBkTKh sfAUwdHhI0IVUmJy8TMkNEOCFpJTJaJjssIHc9I14kSDF1STCAkKGBkmNkUaJ2R0VTfy o7PDKCnT4/OElKS0xNTk9GV1hZWltcXV5fVGVmZ2hpamtsbW5vZHV2d3h5ent8fX5/c4 SFhoeIiYqLjI2Oj4OUlZaXmJmam5ydnp+So6SlpqeoqaqrrK2ur6/9oADAMBAAIRAxEA PwD6A3GsW99qCojGG0sEC3i3HBY5HbdaMT8PX9qmKp3b6xfQQypDIOQPFm+FgqHcfFXe nwn6MVX2N7LHFcmS4qYhWyt4qqCh3b6x6sciNQk04FdvfFUIRa3FtzWSM2pJZ2jDIOdd +KO7tsduvyoNsVYrf6lb3jXGkytIHhkQzzIjDkpRTwJYAHknEVB2pviq0/o/9KJbD0RY C2ZGf0/hN0eMgk406hgcVf/Q71L+Z+qQ6oLZ9IS2YfDa3l5P6SOoPJ+xZKV2+E164q9M 07XZLmL/AEeY29vcfvBHTl6hYcyQT2370xVlelat+kbX0ZYfUkCshNSpPxGle3TFWF+d 9UXR7COLSZCt1ypHAhL8D1YbVrWtcVRPkm9kvrOO81x3E0qlGjZSKgk0YilRt44q9D+o 6H6P1niPS58Tv+1TiD49KnFX/9GQm7/TGvet5hintblFW402CJkkhRTQLHMa0+xTpir3 3TfQggsbkRLYi1Zmmug1UKsPg2Ow2pscVTSbzVcfXIYNPekxQCeiCm4+E16bih64qy/Q rK3tnWe6ljuJ5yzF2/eceQ6OjgJ1/lY4qndydEt4aRC2+tbLcJFSFeJ/ZRWO5PU0rviq K9S2+rm1+pn0iA/Q8ieJP/EfhxV//9JPTtGvtL1qK0ury5lHppITElYgOIISRSS3Q7ca 4q9G1W2mn0j9HW6vbwkhlKfE6czU05svIEk/a6dMVUfL/mDRdHZ9Bg1Ay3dQJS3IsrdS CdwOvjir1iw832sUiW8jCUKoBHMVG3X3+jFVe78xRq6jR5jPqDbiJh6Qp/rEEyfR06Yq jf8AGSfokw+rY/pUSiM/6O+0hJcJz9XjyKj+XFX/05/5b0rUxctqN0ONnLQKwSjRgfCf gBJ+IgnbFWHeYfO8v6ZvtE0uxuDLBSNL9xxVt6tQNTpWmKoG08qxadLd6raSn9LXKGZ7 kgkMxHYHbbpirANN1fW7PWdS1HzLcSKmmUZaigkBUFfhSvYgYqzHQPzS1XWpbmxQ/wCH LJ3BW8WNZZpU9uQKr/slY/LFX0IBoI8rs/8AiOt4yiYS+n8YoSpFfE15dfanHbFX/9T1 1ptrPBMLa7t44jLIzRkgEKW+HjtXoN64qxnzf5Ts1tPr9vFHHJExCShAKhdmNTStSCcV eSqVmtp7sWcXphiouyFZuKCjftADpirzXV7ax8y3Sy2nqaVBbfvEd4+TTsg4kEJyABI2 qemKvKtRfXr27u1i0iT0l2jvAnp8eIA2A2bp+zXFUENX81fVXs/3n1P1FQLXr8DfF1rs 21MVf//V9dp/vZY+t63L46/pD+8pzP2vR+Hj8t8VUvPf1f6tF6n6Mptxp9Y5dO/p708K 9sVeRa79V/RV3x/RnD0m5+l9Z9L7I/vuXxV/1cVSrQvR+rQcf0Pw+rp9j1vS+yP5vixV hv7j9PXn/HI58Dx9b1+P2R/cfs/OvfFWB/6P6X/Sn5fWP+Xiv+9H3Yq//9k= --============_-1133380061==_mr============ Content-Id: Content-Type: image/jpeg; name="USB.jpg" ; x-mac-type="4A504547" ; x-mac-creator="3842494D" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="USB.jpg" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 /9j/4AAQSkZJRgABAgEASABIAAD/7Qs4UGhvdG9zaG9wIDMuMAA4QklNA+kAAAAAAHgA FQAAAEgASAAAAAADGAJkAAAAAAMYAmT/AgMYAmQAAQAAAEgASAAAAAADGAJkAWgAMAtA Q4AATgABAQEAAAABJw8AAQABAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAUHBkZgBkAAAAAAAAIAAAAAAAAIQQ AAACAAEAZMwAVmU3Q1YrU1I4QklNA+0AAAAAABAASAAAAAEAAgBIAAAAAQACOEJJTQQN AAAAAAAEAAAAeDhCSU0D8wAAAAAACAAAAAAAAAAAOEJJTQQKAAAAAAABAAA4QklNJxAA AAAAAAoAAQAAAAAAAAACOEJJTQP1AAAAAABIAC9mZgABAGxmZgAGAAAAAAABAC9mZgAB AKGZmgAGAAAAAAABADIAAAABAFoAAAAGAAAAAAABADUAAAABAC0AAAAGAAAAAAABOEJJ TQP4AAAAAABwAAD/////////////////////////////A+gAAAAA//////////////// /////////////wPoAAAAAP////////////////////////////8D6AAAAAD///////// ////////////////////A+gAADhCSU0ECAAAAAAAEAAAAAEAAAJAAAACQAAAAAA4QklN BBQAAAAAAAQAAAAEOEJJTQQMAAAAAAkkAAAAAQAAAFoAAABWAAABEAAAW2AAAAkIABgA Af/Y/+AAEEpGSUYAAQIBAEgASAAA/+4ADkFkb2JlAGSAAAAAAf/bAIQADAgICAkIDAkJ DBELCgsRFQ8MDA8VGBMTFRMTGBEMDAwMDAwRDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwM DAwMDAENCwsNDg0QDg4QFA4ODhQUDg4ODhQRDAwMDAwREQwMDAwMDBEMDAwMDAwMDAwM DAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwM/8AAEQgAVgBaAwEiAAIRAQMRAf/dAAQABv/EAT8AAAEF AQEBAQEBAAAAAAAAAAMAAQIEBQYHCAkKCwEAAQUBAQEBAQEAAAAAAAAAAQACAwQFBgcI CQoLEAABBAEDAgQCBQcGCAUDDDMBAAIRAwQhEjEFQVFhEyJxgTIGFJGhsUIjJBVSwWIz NHKC0UMHJZJT8OHxY3M1FqKygyZEk1RkRcKjdDYX0lXiZfKzhMPTdePzRieUpIW0lcTU 5PSltcXV5fVWZnaGlqa2xtbm9jdHV2d3h5ent8fX5/cRAAICAQIEBAMEBQYHBwYFNQEA AhEDITESBEFRYXEiEwUygZEUobFCI8FS0fAzJGLhcoKSQ1MVY3M08SUGFqKygwcmNcLS RJNUoxdkRVU2dGXi8rOEw9N14/NGlKSFtJXE1OT0pbXF1eX1VmZ2hpamtsbW5vYnN0dX Z3eHl6e3x//aAAwDAQACEQMRAD8AyMba9wbY0wezV0mBisEPgNa3jTVZXROnG+2XHaG6 66fctt9Tmt2h/OgIiAElNmyypzx7Zd3dEAfJDtrDq3CqA+ND5qFRaCGudPh5ollUwXAS DLawQPypKa9Ruqq9PZ6rwfpvEmT/AN9U2Nba8Vky9hnSAP8ApFKkbMsl9nvIkV9h2/eV gOa57XANb2LeD5d3JKTMDS0xAce4VQYF780PFm+uIew6g/1VdLRpy0u8O3/UpgHMeYcQ wckcpKSP/VwXwAODHJH7qcXSdxMVESWnhO6yn0v0nvZPcKrf06zJG6p7mMOkTpHzSU2b Mlpoc9p3bBIDTp8Asv7Vb+5Zxv5PH7qP+z7cVjaK3FzZ1kyI57Ivr0/6Pv6fz/eSU//Q 6E9PAYHMkg9x4LNz8z7JY1gY6xjtDtHCu4fVhV7XfzY/FWP2n0ixutRLp4IBH5UlNChz LGGwgtJ4a5SZW5vvL410Gh1+aJmYdOfUXYtjqiw+4AxPwVZnTrRDDedCCZ7pKZgNNvqW FosrBAd4oebdTdQyzVzt7ZLvAGDtRLMilryHNAPG08mPBRqbVbMiW+Hb/pJ+KfBkjP8A dNokLBCWq3FdYJYRtY/QiCDNfCHT6jQyuythDq3NZkN/ObAc71B+8nraa7msYwWVv1Lm xIjt7fpK+09NxnMpsYxrr5a32gtg9nT/AClNiyaGAEpaafvenjlxaS/R4lpHU0HMwmVN PT3WNaGWbmyz6RJ/0w/OY1dEGta0ljpYORwEOvBxqQbaqa2GIEAA/JKx8VRoRHuHZN5n MMshIAir3/rTlP8A7pMI8Ipi6tlnBknjWAofZm/6Mf5x58VXuzasesu2kz7Rt7FC+0v/ AH3/AEZUC5//0WbRk3ENAJDDwPBa+PiVgAuEOj2+JPmjBjMZn6IbnHTz/wCqVf1XNyRW 8OAd7j8UlJ8nKFdYqB2PPE9ih4/qvZq5pcJlx+PZDv8As9ktftHeSQD+VCySS1jsVwYD 9MjVseCSk+XgnJdWA8tDXS7aYn4oV+dR04htrXuDtNw1jsFcobDN0zPA7or66jQ8WN3u I+iO38pJSsW4Fgtr9zQJBdySl1DFdmYbntAD6ve2NDI+kEfFqq9NjayIiCNJkco9+A3J pfS87WP4idDyHKTDPgyQlfDRGu/4IkLBDUwOp05opxy5wvLTvA0Et/8AJN9yt5tcUOqp lr3Q3cfPuubqbZ03qbBcINTxJ7Fp03N/rMXUXPa10uJcHceSsc9ghinGWP5Mg4h/6Csx SMgQdxo0m11V0lturQqv2jB/6UK1m2EN9Nrdzu0+BVD9nM8X/vcD6Xh/VVNkf//S1X7v pl0CJgnupkt2hrwHPOoI7Knk5tLXBha5zSdu4NIg/wBtTvvFdbSG7w47SG6H4/SakpJf itfVD4DSeD3UsHHrqb6bW/o+xJJjv7d3tUanEsawgxOodrHwKKTbI2aToNuoSUmdYysh xcyRJ8D/ANFQxnPt323Fr2PEBgA2x5/nIZxLLryQWjaBuHJk/BaePieljmYM9hEfgkpr 9MZXVa8Mr2NdqC3jT+1u/wCgtK1ltLS6SYAgfBNRjBrAIg+I5UL73VSSS6PzTrISUh6l hU9TxPUYNmQwTWTpPjWUbAc27FrdY33bQHt4O5vtf/0mqjjX35GTMFlQJgDQLQtuqr9o +k/g8fFSHKTjGM6iJuH9W/mijh1vvuhtx7LXv26AiGnw0Q/sj/E8bfn4qORbbZcx2PbF bf5wNOn9tP8AbR4DjxH+co0v/9O6a25GL+mPpBuvu0EjwR2U3OPqMc1wcIb8P6/0mp8i oZdTaobtmXk86lEDHBnpY5DS3RriCRp2/dSUzcfQY5wJsdW2S3R0Ej/OROnssuZW+xm1 5kkNEAfepYOHaLD68HdEnsf9XLXrqYBuEhvhoDx/0klOQN7ep7GgbdmpPc86q7RY+zcD oWGI8USpgNm6xp/kxxCdtAN/qNlvYcjnxhJTIGw28kMgDaUG5jQ7aAQ1xh3gp2l7shrG At5mZ57KTavcGnRzxq+SSf8AyKSkLWAHbWNsiBpx8FWJ9J4F8l2urtRqrg9NjwzdLhzu TZGMbHguAf4NSUgbVXUw1VtPu/OAVT7DkeB5/BaQrLJO8actMiPgn+0fy2eHP+1JT//U 18dtfqAueZnUax/a0RcduM295x3b7C4eo3wP8ncGt+ivDkklP0PUGAAkkmNWmef7SVjW kaucPd3BiY4Xzwkkp+iwD6gNjvzfaBP4qZ3+o0aBvc9184pJKfpD2btfpdiUjuiWzHhr +C+b0klP0AXu+0lpr0195I3fd9JW2ueIAYHA/nExHwXzokkp+hcw2ua5tgLK/wB/tH8k e5Z/o43/AHIP+Y5eFJJKf//ZOEJJTQQGAAAAAAAHAAYAAAABAQD/4gxYSUNDX1BST0ZJ TEUAAQEAAAxITGlubwIQAABtbnRyUkdCIFhZWiAHzgACAAkABgAxAABhY3NwTVNGVAAA AABJRUMgc1JHQgAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA9tYAAQAAAADTLUhQICAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABFjcHJ0AAABUAAAADNkZXNj AAABhAAAAGx3dHB0AAAB8AAAABRia3B0AAACBAAAABRyWFlaAAACGAAAABRnWFlaAAAC LAAAABRiWFlaAAACQAAAABRkbW5kAAACVAAAAHBkbWRkAAACxAAAAIh2dWVkAAADTAAA AIZ2aWV3AAAD1AAAACRsdW1pAAAD+AAAABRtZWFzAAAEDAAAACR0ZWNoAAAEMAAAAAxy VFJDAAAEPAAACAxnVFJDAAAEPAAACAxiVFJDAAAEPAAACAx0ZXh0AAAAAENvcHlyaWdo dCAoYykgMTk5OCBIZXdsZXR0LVBhY2thcmQgQ29tcGFueQAAZGVzYwAAAAAAAAASc1JH QiBJRUM2MTk2Ni0yLjEAAAAAAAAAAAAAABJzUkdCIElFQzYxOTY2LTIuMQAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAWFlaIAAAAAAA APNRAAEAAAABFsxYWVogAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAFhZWiAAAAAAAABvogAAOPUAAAOQ WFlaIAAAAAAAAGKZAAC3hQAAGNpYWVogAAAAAAAAJKAAAA+EAAC2z2Rlc2MAAAAAAAAA FklFQyBodHRwOi8vd3d3LmllYy5jaAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAFklFQyBodHRwOi8vd3d3Lmll Yy5jaAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABk ZXNjAAAAAAAAAC5JRUMgNjE5NjYtMi4xIERlZmF1bHQgUkdCIGNvbG91ciBzcGFjZSAt IHNSR0IAAAAAAAAAAAAAAC5JRUMgNjE5NjYtMi4xIERlZmF1bHQgUkdCIGNvbG91ciBz cGFjZSAtIHNSR0IAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAZGVzYwAAAAAAAAAsUmVmZXJl bmNlIFZpZXdpbmcgQ29uZGl0aW9uIGluIElFQzYxOTY2LTIuMQAAAAAAAAAAAAAALFJl ZmVyZW5jZSBWaWV3aW5nIENvbmRpdGlvbiBpbiBJRUM2MTk2Ni0yLjEAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHZpZXcAAAAAABOk/gAUXy4AEM8UAAPtzAAEEwsAA1yeAAAA AVhZWiAAAAAAAEwJVgBQAAAAVx/nbWVhcwAAAAAAAAABAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA Ao8AAAACc2lnIAAAAABDUlQgY3VydgAAAAAAAAQAAAAABQAKAA8AFAAZAB4AIwAoAC0A MgA3ADsAQABFAEoATwBUAFkAXgBjAGgAbQByAHcAfACBAIYAiwCQAJUAmgCfAKQAqQCu ALIAtwC8AMEAxgDLANAA1QDbAOAA5QDrAPAA9gD7AQEBBwENARMBGQEfASUBKwEyATgB PgFFAUwBUgFZAWABZwFuAXUBfAGDAYsBkgGaAaEBqQGxAbkBwQHJAdEB2QHhAekB8gH6 AgMCDAIUAh0CJgIvAjgCQQJLAlQCXQJnAnECegKEAo4CmAKiAqwCtgLBAssC1QLgAusC 9QMAAwsDFgMhAy0DOANDA08DWgNmA3IDfgOKA5YDogOuA7oDxwPTA+AD7AP5BAYEEwQg BC0EOwRIBFUEYwRxBH4EjASaBKgEtgTEBNME4QTwBP4FDQUcBSsFOgVJBVgFZwV3BYYF lgWmBbUFxQXVBeUF9gYGBhYGJwY3BkgGWQZqBnsGjAadBq8GwAbRBuMG9QcHBxkHKwc9 B08HYQd0B4YHmQesB78H0gflB/gICwgfCDIIRghaCG4IggiWCKoIvgjSCOcI+wkQCSUJ OglPCWQJeQmPCaQJugnPCeUJ+woRCicKPQpUCmoKgQqYCq4KxQrcCvMLCwsiCzkLUQtp C4ALmAuwC8gL4Qv5DBIMKgxDDFwMdQyODKcMwAzZDPMNDQ0mDUANWg10DY4NqQ3DDd4N +A4TDi4OSQ5kDn8Omw62DtIO7g8JDyUPQQ9eD3oPlg+zD88P7BAJECYQQxBhEH4QmxC5 ENcQ9RETETERTxFtEYwRqhHJEegSBxImEkUSZBKEEqMSwxLjEwMTIxNDE2MTgxOkE8UT 5RQGFCcUSRRqFIsUrRTOFPAVEhU0FVYVeBWbFb0V4BYDFiYWSRZsFo8WshbWFvoXHRdB F2UXiReuF9IX9xgbGEAYZRiKGK8Y1Rj6GSAZRRlrGZEZtxndGgQaKhpRGncanhrFGuwb FBs7G2MbihuyG9ocAhwqHFIcexyjHMwc9R0eHUcdcB2ZHcMd7B4WHkAeah6UHr4e6R8T Hz4faR+UH78f6iAVIEEgbCCYIMQg8CEcIUghdSGhIc4h+yInIlUigiKvIt0jCiM4I2Yj lCPCI/AkHyRNJHwkqyTaJQklOCVoJZclxyX3JicmVyaHJrcm6CcYJ0kneierJ9woDSg/ KHEooijUKQYpOClrKZ0p0CoCKjUqaCqbKs8rAis2K2krnSvRLAUsOSxuLKIs1y0MLUEt di2rLeEuFi5MLoIuty7uLyQvWi+RL8cv/jA1MGwwpDDbMRIxSjGCMbox8jIqMmMymzLU Mw0zRjN/M7gz8TQrNGU0njTYNRM1TTWHNcI1/TY3NnI2rjbpNyQ3YDecN9c4FDhQOIw4 yDkFOUI5fzm8Ofk6Njp0OrI67zstO2s7qjvoPCc8ZTykPOM9Ij1hPaE94D4gPmA+oD7g PyE/YT+iP+JAI0BkQKZA50EpQWpBrEHuQjBCckK1QvdDOkN9Q8BEA0RHRIpEzkUSRVVF mkXeRiJGZ0arRvBHNUd7R8BIBUhLSJFI10kdSWNJqUnwSjdKfUrESwxLU0uaS+JMKkxy TLpNAk1KTZNN3E4lTm5Ot08AT0lPk0/dUCdQcVC7UQZRUFGbUeZSMVJ8UsdTE1NfU6pT 9lRCVI9U21UoVXVVwlYPVlxWqVb3V0RXklfgWC9YfVjLWRpZaVm4WgdaVlqmWvVbRVuV W+VcNVyGXNZdJ114XcleGl5sXr1fD19hX7NgBWBXYKpg/GFPYaJh9WJJYpxi8GNDY5dj 62RAZJRk6WU9ZZJl52Y9ZpJm6Gc9Z5Nn6Wg/aJZo7GlDaZpp8WpIap9q92tPa6dr/2xX bK9tCG1gbbluEm5rbsRvHm94b9FwK3CGcOBxOnGVcfByS3KmcwFzXXO4dBR0cHTMdSh1 hXXhdj52m3b4d1Z3s3gReG54zHkqeYl553pGeqV7BHtje8J8IXyBfOF9QX2hfgF+Yn7C fyN/hH/lgEeAqIEKgWuBzYIwgpKC9INXg7qEHYSAhOOFR4Wrhg6GcobXhzuHn4gEiGmI zokziZmJ/opkisqLMIuWi/yMY4zKjTGNmI3/jmaOzo82j56QBpBukNaRP5GokhGSepLj k02TtpQglIqU9JVflcmWNJaflwqXdZfgmEyYuJkkmZCZ/JpomtWbQpuvnByciZz3nWSd 0p5Anq6fHZ+Ln/qgaaDYoUehtqImopajBqN2o+akVqTHpTilqaYapoum/adup+CoUqjE qTepqaocqo+rAqt1q+msXKzQrUStuK4trqGvFq+LsACwdbDqsWCx1rJLssKzOLOutCW0 nLUTtYq2AbZ5tvC3aLfguFm40blKucK6O7q1uy67p7whvJu9Fb2Pvgq+hL7/v3q/9cBw wOzBZ8Hjwl/C28NYw9TEUcTOxUvFyMZGxsPHQce/yD3IvMk6ybnKOMq3yzbLtsw1zLXN Nc21zjbOts83z7jQOdC60TzRvtI/0sHTRNPG1EnUy9VO1dHWVdbY11zX4Nhk2OjZbNnx 2nba+9uA3AXcit0Q3ZbeHN6i3ynfr+A24L3hROHM4lPi2+Nj4+vkc+T85YTmDeaW5x/n qegy6LzpRunQ6lvq5etw6/vshu0R7ZzuKO6070DvzPBY8OXxcvH/8ozzGfOn9DT0wvVQ 9d72bfb794r4Gfio+Tj5x/pX+uf7d/wH/Jj9Kf26/kv+3P9t////7gAOQWRvYmUAZEAA AAAB/9sAhAACAgICAgICAgICAwICAgMEAwICAwQFBAQEBAQFBgUFBQUFBQYGBwcIBwcG CQkKCgkJDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMAQMDAwUEBQkGBgkNCgkKDQ8ODg4ODw8MDAwMDA8P DAwMDAwMDwwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAz/wAARCABWAFoDAREAAhEB AxEB/90ABAAM/8QBogAAAAcBAQEBAQAAAAAAAAAABAUDAgYBAAcICQoLAQACAgMBAQEB AQAAAAAAAAABAAIDBAUGBwgJCgsQAAIBAwMCBAIGBwMEAgYCcwECAxEEAAUhEjFBUQYT YSJxgRQykaEHFbFCI8FS0eEzFmLwJHKC8SVDNFOSorJjc8I1RCeTo7M2F1RkdMPS4ggm gwkKGBmElEVGpLRW01UoGvLj88TU5PRldYWVpbXF1eX1ZnaGlqa2xtbm9jdHV2d3h5en t8fX5/c4SFhoeIiYqLjI2Oj4KTlJWWl5iZmpucnZ6fkqOkpaanqKmqq6ytrq+hEAAgIB AgMFBQQFBgQIAwNtAQACEQMEIRIxQQVRE2EiBnGBkTKhsfAUwdHhI0IVUmJy8TMkNEOC FpJTJaJjssIHc9I14kSDF1STCAkKGBkmNkUaJ2R0VTfyo7PDKCnT4/OElKS0xNTk9GV1 hZWltcXV5fVGVmZ2hpamtsbW5vZHV2d3h5ent8fX5/c4SFhoeIiYqLjI2Oj4OUlZaXmJ mam5ydnp+So6SlpqeoqaqrrK2ur6/9oADAMBAAIRAxEAPwDzp5bNveXNvb6laSJDOV5R 24FajbqOtcVfbfkHyxaxGO9NvHZWdsq8FVFDt81pTFXrGoajplxdIPqBnuAFE90UVI4Q FAWqAUaq0xVKdT06GewuYtIeODUGiYxTbCjEkjjXx64qxPSZNW0jSjp509dav0k5LqF9 EXkMjkswrUngmwpiqZ2dvBrF7b6c7l7/AE5zMFgZEQUJYGs0gahov34q9RtIbdreUIYU u3qqSowboaV5KSK7b79cVefR+QdcvfOcN6mtG+0tohHqVhOgkjmA+ICNmrxC9x41xV6/ ecvLkMuoCK3ih4qjtGf3rwqAGjY9zUGmKoiLWDK73Ly+lo00KyyWk7BYwtBQU6e598Va 1HzFbvod9f2tw90un27SRwW0haEqCQEQ164q8L/xNqf/AFb9W/uv0h/fP9j/AH31/DFX /9CJfkp+XU2v6o813ILOC1UO3q8kp3AQtir6gvdKuLa3+rxaiVE1UjnjZOCIpoWAIqDt iqK0qSCJ4rW4uWuNuMRahEh8Wptiqc6jpTSCN7mKNponD2ulQzxQ8m7UeQGu29FxVj+j RtZ+bJJb/Vv9NlgZ49HICxx7cCprKvLcqenX6MVZhHcW1zdWF2kdtaAlkktlojqqtVOK h34gkDouKsze3iX6vX17N7oVdoWHGP8AyeXFD+GKoeJJrK9lEd3PDYxlfWeNVMgJANSR vvkjEgAkbFFsom1LR20l21MnUNOMgPKRBUkbbKdhv198ilgWufl1f+aka40rVbnTtPuB wMbPxQoegBeqj7sVSY+QNT8p2tloOnXc1zbmcG4Ek4lTgfjY1Sincntiqf8A6b0b/q0n 7f6N+yPt/wC/OnTFX//R9hv5Ahjsbe5slkkhlPJpI2LcU7UPWhHTFXi/n3zgvk2/sLOP TLrVbC8Jhn+rxcjEBvvtT4mrirJNCnstTsZtRlt57Kd0BgtrlVVlqKU+jt7Yqi7SxurY i7l1RLdQ4ZIl9KRhMu4DcweKlWFaYqg4YYH1T9J6jJa2+paTA6Q3QAYyNy5MWYDc16eG 2KpR501fSdZ0LTtTKyXdwuoWSyS3IqCkU4R/TLVPGi03zsvYjJOOryxiSDLBl2B5kQJH vI6Ov7SAOOJPSUfvZPpmq+VbjUomfT3gNrpl8WhnhVJIJPVtOPBqUoaMwp4nxOanTZsv 5DKLJBzY9rNSPDlv33tfw8m+cY+LH+qfvCUaOt/bxaXp2p6Lpk0V3pN1bab5utGqLq2C JNIbpOrOeKnm1RyrTrXOw7Tzx1MMmfTZskOHLA5MGQUcUrMR4UhyEbMeECJ4efKnAwxM CIziDcTUh1HPcfp70B5MstNtpfyeu9TtbOLT9XS6tPX06n1qaVxx/wBNRlHONDU1BNDv 89529I6uHauKM5SOOUZEZN4QET/kjZ4ZnlyFjZxtKOA4JEAXY25n+t5PsiO2toLeWWyu vUsYgA6VKItBtTpXPF3oWP3NhaaoeUM7STPvGokMaUGxFVIxVKP8OW3/AFZoftU/3qf7 f8/XFX//0vVXk7814tLBtbooNJiWjsW/va7/AAj2rTFWWH8zfyj1KAibQne5MvxRyQxP EWrUEBnB49zt1rirCfN/lDSPzD0uafynq15octg5+txxzrEXLHkOCqeRAB/mOKsLsvy8 1SMQWM3miZjBJHLL6xYGQCgKgVNKgAHxxVNNS1/Rre8mjuLKOOcs0Ys5hyebgePJKjjv Su+KoPS7bSdXFwHiWS0YEKjAemo/aUiUFTQ1qKUy3DnyYJjJjkYyG4IJBHuI3DGURIUR YRNhBJpesWOn2emR6ppd+ec17bhRJH6ZKhAsYCyL16jbLtTr9RqSDlnKRHKzyvnXv6sY YoQ+kAPW7eb8uPKtzp2halptjaXXmkva2qrZo9sEchmSVmHFQzkAqtaMRUAb5v8ATY+1 u08GTVRyykMFSNzPFYHMdSRG/UegNG9nFnLBhkIGIHFty2eg6f5H8taItxq2leXNKsJV iMMTRW8UcgB68GVQQD12zTantfW6mJhmzZJxJupTlIX30SXJhgxwNxiAfIBU1C646Y0I WO4ieOtzEByRCOnXvTNc2vLdY86aX5b02W4+qyz/AFilvCbYFmidu5ptiqSf4lvv+rpf /wC83rd+n8vXrir/AP/TQg0PzJrUsNpDHM8GnPREgSlEJ5VqPGtcVfRXl7ynp0MUcl1F wuBGBZMADI7/ALSyV964qyHzJ5oXTNOh0ZLl7HUJAFjSU8lhk6jpsFI32xVJvLp1K9s0 Ml3ayXEZf6xdueJ+232PD6MVQHm3yTJ5pn0qGLUXs4rW6We7e2kZDKoAJDlSOQJ8cVSL XfPGh/lpJBBqtpf3SXTMgvoQJCgYmNKkgkAdt8Vez+VtWiksk1fTSL23hgDpPcHlLIx6 ivsdsVXef/LNx528nXV7bQQW97ooOo2bJ8Dc0XlIldt2UED3AzrPYztf+T+0IiX93l9E h7+R+B+y3A7R0/i4jXOO4TLyH+Zej+eo/LPlua/vYPMs9pI2ppGCsPqW9eVGLCpkQcwF BA3BzL9pfY3UdnHNqI14EZDh33qXLb+iTw71fRr0XaMM3DA/URv8Pxb0Hzlp5TQrzSNC WS0v7sJbm7foPWYfHQd6038K5xDs2F2+naVpmjPbaqv1i2ibkzMvwuetSpFK4q8+/T/k n+Q/71en0HTwxV//1PU0NrZeVrRho8T3VzKAhPJfVb/WrKv0bdMVYeNTmt/Mlvp19b3d vFcgXMnIgqrhRQCjMNxv1xVbra+XdT9aC8FtGRyf1JJo4ZG5HYcy6laFTt9OKsc8xyzT QaVceUb2Kxhd1OoSxkT26wj4eChSysxA64q9X0S242a3a3HqGZR6cLM3qGmxNO1SK4qy C7sdKl0TUI9Rshqd3NF/vFGwUoCeKyEt0C9fnirKfK2maWthp1tptzbtGsQhlhYxiQyo xZyoIZWNa1I3xVk+teQrfzRouqaJeSCzsb8AwiBn/cyD40loxqaN1B2IqBtm07G7Vydm aqGox7mPMHqDzHy69GjU4BngYHq+KNMtdS/K/wDMzS4tci9CfRdRi+syCvCS1kPB5Y2P VXiYkH79657/AKvJh7e7IyHCbGSBrvEhuAfMSAeUxiWl1A4uh+z+x956tdwWk4kuHmvE vCqx8fiWMKKcjXuCTTPmx7J5j51v5ltzplraC9vGUiH12IHB9+RHRjQ7VxV5F/yryy/3 9qf2frf90n+9P8n+pir/AP/V7/dNMGS9a8RI/RVzE77mQt2C0G/U0xVMpGtjBHbX0SXl /ITJFcodowTULyO42xVIdb8r299pTRXohgtpXDFHoRKtT0I9ycVR3kfy7p+k2o0u0tmX TeTNHLK7zKlCXBjMpKD4iV2HtirMZtQs9LmiuJ7ywDw85KBgjmi/ZKxALQHwH44qgPLk 93q36T1fW3tdQsNRiMMFhGiGBo/5X4jmwrv8XfFWU/lpa6fpOrahHZ6MmmW96weKS3P7 pjGOLEI05cdaGsY6eFMVe3araapo0Nxc85bgxxRlIlJbl6agsorTqOu2KsC/MfyXov5r +Ul1OxiOn+arGIy6RJNxQSj9u1c/ysR8Nfsn2Jzr/ZD2ml2PqOGZvDM+od39MeY69486 df2hohqIWPqHL9TIfIk8GueV9IutUtV+sCzSDUrTeORbm3/czBh1r6iNUHNN27po6bXZ YQ3jxExrlwy9Uf8AYkOTpZmeKJPOt/eNj9qU6p5e1DV77UfQLRxyxrHazKf7vigFAeoO 2alvSX/CV5/y0Tf3H1T7f+7f5+vX3xV//9bo/mbzno1tcQ2cljc3Ns8q24vIrZ4eD7Hd ZiWFD779RtiqYa1rcOnWFrKlo1/DdOttJHbtwmJbo7H1UNAOtWT6epVTnTbmaazsrJra YQLKzTJdFpCijcBHJY0PXY/firIHbVFlhWwYoJVWO3W0X1IiOvxBum9a++KqEnlS/wBZ 1qd0ks0azjj+tQBWll9RwKllSlFPflUHFXu3l7yodI8vTrIIpGkZgkEaoEFWP2VQBR9A xVmuh+XYre1gURMjsrs0kXwuOTEkE++KpbruuzaQJ55Zprn0itLF1EhdOjMG34kgMNup piryny5ruueZfMvqtFPpmkQTOIIYhwRgrEGoWgO4NMVev6rq2maZwtI+a3GoNyjuaBeL KeTlmXep75KUzKrN1sgCnmvmDVdW1HWNOuvLWuFNKtGZtaitXVoWPEEesW3U+FMilX/x mv8Ayzp/d/78j6/786fj1xV//9fpsmnQeZfLHLWrj9BR2RadDcExoJIWBPDwJ9sVZRaa Tq9zKNTsry2vIrqMJaLUmidAROfjj6dFOKs0uH/w/Y31zHcPql1ploZJrIhJ2R3QcAQQ XAZj47jFU58g2epazY6Peanp31O9kLyXFtaxlIIyakAo29ada98VREYu7b8zmtLSGIW/ 6MDSu4YCR6h+Lj7J2Uge2KvUNFv77UxfRz/upbCQRLbAmsigDkyj2O2KsoRtQn1XiLh4 dOEKJ9WdjxJ2BJXpU4qxrWLW3iuWt1hmS2upGjvKAFCoavwjsKj78VatrOGGVoNNjFq0 sBSAKi8UI2BQ9iRuad8VYM7nSrqNNeV7i6AkAluPjRvUqq7NUdlH04qndtpVhpNlLpOm Wj0uUNLqJACzMKmrAVPWmKvO/wDA3mL/AH3N/vRXp/uvFX//0O/eYdLTzhpNlpRjthbe sH1SV6eoObkkV8CKV8cVTeO0uo7VtK8tzW9nNZuIra+lieeJQgoI+JJQbeAxVnHkfydq kOo3A8wIkxvlRp5xQxuqkbEdPtkEDsK4q+jNO0u0jj9eNZUtnLssYVEcsqUVeW3qVAqe WKsX0yzifURc6lYXCk8jaeiR6ZUVBBB+mo+eKq1roqy66NRtUktCpaOFj6iBVfdzIqEK xLE0Phiqjqj3dzr9nY2MMtoqh1naVmNZgKowLEniRQ0xVFw6TyuUtJERLi/j4zX5mkea VtgxWpolKtSnWlcVS6M6daXqWa3XrXaNxk+sE8lI7KO1PbFVPzD5bfVLyN7qOHUFAUW9 qrUVqUYGvahH34qsisJbNnl/SkVIwBLbS80MXEAAI1CT034q3zGKq3+ID/y36b04f3g6 f8jPtfj/AJGKv//R9GeX7aw/SEctzfv6iyfvrZVf0Gr3lJjKinbkfliqf+X7fy1ba7qM vlu/XUNUe6Q6xa8eLI4rxEZkSNDVKdW/hir6D0tbJIopnlkmcxgS2bq6gPQ78pPh5Ur3 r1xVq+gheJjLfX0Q+uhmSWOYw+r6agISAe29TtiqarFJ9ft5NQuXDC2AtLeAPQigoXPE j7ziqaP9aa/s0b047QJ8cuxc/wCqF3/DFUZSyNwyzMFulJ9N5B8TCm3EHf7NMVWuLgxB 7dpFgUf3J5nlu1eBPwjavfpiryCa7uP8SPbyaUpg5yMb+SWD6x9okqqBvUrSoBp/Lir0 S2uL2FoIotPjvEkcf6TNIqCMHc8FDBSQdvi3xVjXm+TVLm2u7XVLabTtNBp+ky4MXCgI MaL6rE12ICr/ABxV49+ifLf/AFNsn2af7wXHX7/x/DFX/9k= --============_-1133380061==_mr============-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 8 07:38:27 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i28Fb7OK027332; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 07:38:20 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i28Fb3mW027233; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 07:37:03 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 07:37:03 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <404C9296.5040007 rtpatlanta.com> Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2004 10:34:46 -0500 From: "Terry Blanton" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Mars stems, marbles, threads References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53445 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Horace Heffner wrote: >In the original photos I thought the central stripes looked like cutter >marks too. > The tool striations are discussed here: http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/press/opportunity/20040225a.html on the second image down. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 8 08:05:30 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i28G41OK001939; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 08:05:26 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i28G3u7l001853; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 08:03:56 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 08:03:56 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <404C98E4.2070600 rtpatlanta.com> Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2004 11:01:40 -0500 From: "Terry Blanton" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Big Martian Rock References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53446 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Horace Heffner wrote: >Hey, what's that two leafed sprout doing coming up out of the ground at >958,663? > Buggs Bunny admiring the image of Mickey Mouse that Spirit brushed on the rock? :-) From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 8 09:54:16 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i28HsA2l026182; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 09:54:12 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i28HrleR026071; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 09:53:47 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 09:53:47 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Reply-To: From: "Keith Nagel" To: Subject: RE: Mars stems, marbles, threads Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 13:18:38 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <404C9296.5040007 rtpatlanta.com> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 X-Rcpt-To: Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53448 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Yep, I'd have loved to be at mission control when that first picture of the cut spherule was downloaded. They must have browned their shorts when they saw what really looks like internal structure in that thing. Then the RAT people had to burst the bubble... What are those inclusions, anyway? Bits of rock? It's interesting how they show up so well in the 3D pic but hardly at all in the 2D pics. BTW, here's the RAT homepage with a good picture of the business end of this creature. http://www.honeybeerobotics.com/rat.html Maybe I should stop by Elizabeth St. and say hi, I'm surprised I haven't run into these folks before. NYC is a small town. It's worth noting that the analysis Terry points to was released on the same day as the raw pictures. Clearly there are people on the mission as anxious as we are to see something beyond the rocks... K. -----Original Message----- From: Terry Blanton [mailto:blantont rtpatlanta.com] Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 10:35 AM To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Mars stems, marbles, threads Horace Heffner wrote: >In the original photos I thought the central stripes looked like cutter >marks too. > The tool striations are discussed here: http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/press/opportunity/20040225a.html on the second image down. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 8 09:54:24 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i28HsA2l026187; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 09:54:12 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i28HreCm026009; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 09:53:40 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 09:53:40 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Reply-To: From: "Keith Nagel" To: Subject: RE: Big Martian Rock Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 13:18:40 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <404C98E4.2070600 rtpatlanta.com> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 X-Rcpt-To: Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53447 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Terry writes: >Buggs Bunny admiring the image of Mickey Mouse that Spirit brushed on >the rock? :-) Another crude trick by Michael Eisner to shore up his position after that blistering 40% no confidence vote. They're saying today that they could not cut into flat rock. Given that the tool being used is diamond, does that mean flat rock is a huge diamond? 8^) They could pay for the next sample recovery mission by retrieving that one. K. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 8 10:22:48 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i28IMi2l006105; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 10:22:45 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i28IMgNZ006085; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 10:22:42 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 10:22:42 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <404CB9D5.9030309 rtpatlanta.com> Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2004 13:22:13 -0500 From: "Terry Blanton" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: [Fwd: Re: Big Martian Rock] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53449 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: Big Martian Rock Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2004 13:21:06 -0500 From: Terry Blanton To: knagel gis.net References: Keith Nagel wrote: >They're saying today that they could not cut into flat rock. Given >that the tool being used is diamond, does that mean flat >rock is a huge diamond? 8^) They could pay for the next sample >recovery mission by retrieving that one. > Shhhhhhh! We already have Martians scuttling our probes -- don't get DeBeers into the act. In all fairness to Horace, his discovery *does* look a bit like the rabbit imaged early on in Opportunity's mission: http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/spotlight/opportunity/b19_20040304.html From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 8 10:36:10 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i28Ia52l012901; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 10:36:06 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i28IZx0O012844; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 10:35:59 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 10:35:59 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-Id: <6.0.3.0.2.20040308133450.01cc8bf8 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell mindspring.com@pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.3.0 Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2004 13:35:59 -0500 To: vortex-L eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: Nuclear plant to reopen Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53450 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: An AP report: Ohio Nuclear Plant Can Reopen, Agency Says Published: March 8, 2004 at 1:02 p.m. ET WASHINGTON (AP) -- An Ohio nuclear plant is being allowed to reopen after a two-year shutdown over safety issues stemming from a leaking acid that nearly ate through a protective steel reactor cap, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission announced Monday. Corrosion on the reactor vessel at the Davis-Besse plant along Lake Erie east of Toledo, Ohio, was the most extensive ever found at a U.S. nuclear reactor and led to a review of 68 similar plants nationwide. NRC officials blamed plant operators for allowing a breakdown in safety standards that caused the leak to go unnoticed for years. The plant is owned by FirstEnergy Corp., in Akron, Ohio, the same company that a U.S.-Canadian government task force said shares much of the blame for the Northeast blackout last August. . . . From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 8 10:38:01 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i28Ibk2l014008; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 10:37:59 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i28IbiZs013979; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 10:37:44 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 10:37:44 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Reply-To: From: "Keith Nagel" To: "Vortex" Subject: Image processing software Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 14:02:56 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 X-Rcpt-To: Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53451 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Hi All. >From that branch of the Government we fondly call, "Not Invented Here", comes a rather interesting bit of image processing software >http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/< It's written in Java, so it'll work on all your crazy machines ( sort of ), and it reads that wacky format NASA uses for it's satellite imaging systems. Plug-in's galore, but I have no idea how good all this stuff really is. But it's free as in beer, and who can complain about the occasion rough edge??? Take a crack at it, Horace, and tell me what you think. K. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 8 13:19:14 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i28LJ92l018493; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 13:19:11 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i28LJ4QU018458; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 13:19:04 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 13:19:04 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 12:24:14 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: Big Martian Rock] Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53452 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 1:22 PM 3/8/4, Terry Blanton wrote: >-------- Original Message -------- >Subject: Re: Big Martian Rock >Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2004 13:21:06 -0500 >From: Terry Blanton >To: knagel gis.net >References: > > > >Keith Nagel wrote: > >>They're saying today that they could not cut into flat rock. Given >>that the tool being used is diamond, does that mean flat >>rock is a huge diamond? 8^) They could pay for the next sample >>recovery mission by retrieving that one. >> > >Shhhhhhh! We already have Martians scuttling our probes -- don't get >DeBeers into the act. It strikes me as more likely that the tool stalled. Suppose the rock is in fact not hard, but is thawing, especially under the pressure of the knurled balls. The grinder will then advance too fast and stall. > >In all fairness to Horace, his discovery *does* look a bit like the >rabbit imaged early on in Opportunity's mission: > >http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/spotlight/opportunity/b19_20040304.html That though crossed my mind as I clipped out the two leaf image. I was wondering at the time if perchance Craig Haynie edited it in there as a joke. If it IS the rabbit, that thing sure makes good time travelling around. 8^) Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 8 14:00:23 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i28M0D2l001906; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 14:00:19 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i28M09gg001879; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 14:00:09 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 14:00:09 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-Id: <6.0.3.0.2.20040308165914.01cdda60 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell mindspring.com@pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.3.0 Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2004 17:00:04 -0500 To: vortex-L eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: OFF TOPIC Voting machines Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53453 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Regarding voting machines and receipts, Diebold and some election officials have claimed that it would cost a great deal of money to retrofit the machines with printers. I recently served as election clerk, and I discovered that these machines are already equipped with printers. The debate has taken a surrealistic turn. I wrote a brief technical report describing some of the difficulties we experienced at our precinct. Here is the paragraph about printers: Meg Smothers of the League of Women Voters recently said that Georgia has 28,000 voting machines, and it would cost $15 million to retrofit them with printers to produce receipts. [1] That comes to $535 per machine. Yet these machines already have printers. They produce a paper receipt at the end of the day showing the vote tallies. The printers are the kind used in cash registers, and they have large rolls of paper that would easily last through the 12 hours the polls remain open. It takes people about a minute to cast a ballot, so one machine would need to print at most 720 receipts per day. The printer and paper are located on the right side of the machine, under a locked metal cover. It would be a simple matter to fabricate a new metal equipment cover with an outlet above the printer, that would print a receipt for the voter. Based on the retail cost of similar metal computer equipment cases available in any computer store, this should cost approximately $30 per machine, not $500. The programming change would be trivial. - Jed 1. M. Smothers, "EQUAL TIME: Paper receipts no guarantee," Atlanta Journal-Constitution op-ed page, February 23, 2004. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 8 14:04:50 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i28M4i2l004116; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 14:04:46 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i28M4h5a004101; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 14:04:43 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 14:04:43 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <404CEDEF.6070401 rtpatlanta.com> Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2004 17:04:31 -0500 From: "Terry Blanton" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: Big Martian Rock] References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53454 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Horace Heffner wrote: >It strikes me as more likely that the tool stalled. Suppose the rock is in >fact not hard, but is thawing, especially under the pressure of the knurled >balls. The grinder will then advance too fast and stall. > Humphrey is a Spirit rock. These are mostly basalt, right? >That though crossed my mind as I clipped out the two leaf image. I was >wondering at the time if perchance Craig Haynie edited it in there as a >joke. > Not this time. It's in the raw images from Spirit. >If it IS the rabbit, that thing sure makes good time travelling around. 8^) > Which reminds me of an animation of the tortoise and the hare. No matter how fast the hare ran, the tortoise always showed up ahead of him. We find out in the end that there were a dozen tortoises (tortii?) and they were cheating. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 8 14:19:59 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i28MJj2l009962; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 14:19:46 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i28MJdi9009900; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 14:19:39 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 14:19:39 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-Id: <6.0.3.0.2.20040308170015.01ce12b0 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell mindspring.com@pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.3.0 Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2004 17:19:47 -0500 To: vortex-L eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: LENR-CANR passes 450,000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53455 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: We passed 450,000 download last week. Ho-hum. I have become blase. It does not seem to be having any effect on public opinion, so I see no reason to get excited. Perhaps it is having an unseen, subterranean effect, like the colony of ants gradually eating away at a gigantic tree. I noted a slight shift in Park's latest pronouncement: "Cold fusion, of course, still has believers, but not much confirmation." In the past he would have said something like "zero confirmation." Maybe he feels the ants nibbling away at his feet. I wonder if, perhaps, every time he writes something like that he gets a barrage of mail from people who have read LENR-CANR.org, and he is getting tired of being told there is evidence. He must be getting nervous about Taleyarken and sonofusion, by now. His attack against Taleyarken seems unusually shrill, even for him. I detect a slight touch of hysteria, or panic. I believe that Park has done the field of cold fusion a great service, and if he did not exist we would have to invent him. His opposition has probably not slowed things down any more than they would have been slowed anyway, given the widespread antipathy toward cold fusion. Besides, Park opposes nearly everything. If he had influence and he could actually stop research, progress everywhere would have ground to halt years ago. Park is a perfect foil; he puts the opposition to CF in the worst possible light. As Hamlet said: I'll be your foil, Laertes. In mine ignorance Your skill shall, like a star i' th' darkest night, Stick fiery off indeed. - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 8 15:21:49 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i28NLi2l030361; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 15:21:45 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i28NLfiS030332; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 15:21:41 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 15:21:41 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <404D00C2.E4A7B00B ix.netcom.com> Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2004 15:24:49 -0800 From: Edmund Storms Organization: Energy K System X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77C-CCK-MCD {C-UDP; EBM-APPLE} (Macintosh; U; PPC) X-Accept-Language: en,pdf MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: OFF TOPIC Voting machines References: <6.0.3.0.2.20040308165914.01cdda60 pop.mindspring.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53456 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: I suggest that when reality is being distorted, someone has something to gain by the lie. Obviously, Diebold could have added the feature Jed is suggesting for trivial cost when the machines were manufactured. The question is, why was this not done? The answer is that such a printed receipt would have made possible the detection of voter fraud. Therefore, I predict we are witnessing the destruction of democracy as we know it. Just think about the diabolical cleverness of this approach. The company provides software that tallies the vote. No one is allowed to see the software because it is proprietary. The voting tally is provided so fast and easily that no one questions the numbers, nor do they have any way to check the values even if they were suspicious. The winner is announced on the same day as the voting and everyone goes back to their lives satisfied that we have finally created a perfect system with no messy court decisions or ambiguous ballots. Meanwhile, the winner is chosen by the owner of the software. Ed Jed Rothwell wrote: > Regarding voting machines and receipts, Diebold and some election officials > have claimed that it would cost a great deal of money to retrofit the > machines with printers. I recently served as election clerk, and I > discovered that these machines are already equipped with printers. The > debate has taken a surrealistic turn. I wrote a brief technical report > describing some of the difficulties we experienced at our precinct. Here is > the paragraph about printers: > > Meg Smothers of the League of Women Voters recently said that Georgia has > 28,000 voting machines, and it would cost $15 million to retrofit them with > printers to produce receipts. [1] That comes to $535 per machine. Yet these > machines already have printers. They produce a paper receipt at the end of > the day showing the vote tallies. The printers are the kind used in cash > registers, and they have large rolls of paper that would easily last > through the 12 hours the polls remain open. It takes people about a minute > to cast a ballot, so one machine would need to print at most 720 receipts > per day. The printer and paper are located on the right side of the > machine, under a locked metal cover. It would be a simple matter to > fabricate a new metal equipment cover with an outlet above the printer, > that would print a receipt for the voter. Based on the retail cost of > similar metal computer equipment cases available in any computer store, > this should cost approximately $30 per machine, not $500. The programming > change would be trivial. > > - Jed > > 1. M. Smothers, "EQUAL TIME: Paper receipts no guarantee," Atlanta > Journal-Constitution op-ed page, February 23, 2004. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 8 15:56:39 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i28NuX2l011295; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 15:56:34 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i28NuWUV011281; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 15:56:32 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 15:56:32 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-Id: <6.0.3.0.2.20040308183608.01ce5718 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell mindspring.com@pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.3.0 Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2004 18:56:36 -0500 To: vortex-L eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: Re: OFF TOPIC Voting machines Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <_GRu0C.A.NwC.wgQTAB ultra5.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53457 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Edmund Storms wrote: > I suggest that when reality is being distorted, someone has something to gain > by the lie. Obviously, Diebold could have added the feature Jed is suggesting > for trivial cost when the machines were manufactured. The question is, why > was this not done? The answer is that such a printed receipt would have made > possible the detection of voter fraud. Many people have realized this by now, including several senators, congressmen, and secretaries of state (the local election officials). Congress is likely to pass a law making printed receipts mandatory, possibly before the next election. Several states have rejected the machines. The Diebold Corporation has alarmed many people lately, which may trigger action on this bill. The Chief Executive Officer is the head of the local Republican party and a major contributor. In a recent fund-raising letter he said he is "committed to helping Ohio deliver its electoral votes to the president next year." Also, a large chunk of the secret source code for the Diebold machine was found on the Internet at a Diebold corporate site in a file called "rob-georgia" -- a suspicious moniker, to say the least. (Georgia was the first state to adopt these machines, and soon after they were brought in several election results came out quite unexpectedly, in my opinion.) Some programmers who have seen the code describe it as amateur-looking impenetrable "spaghetti code." > Therefore, I predict we are witnessing > the destruction of democracy as we know it. That is too extreme, in my opinion. We are seeing a threat to democracy. Similar threats have often arisen in the past. The US has a long history of vote fraud, ballot stuffing, dead people voting and other election day shenanigans. This is merely the latest high tech version of an old shell game. > The company provides software that tallies the > vote. No one is allowed to see the software because it is proprietary. The > voting tally is provided so fast and easily that no one questions the numbers, > nor do they have any way to check the values even if they were suspicious. > The winner is announced on the same day as the voting and everyone goes back > to their lives satisfied that we have finally created a perfect system with no > messy court decisions or ambiguous ballots. This can only happen if the vote is very close. In every major election, all over the country, the press stations thousands of people taking exit polls, and these exit polls record the vote at each sample precinct to within a percent. Usually the margin of error is smaller than the vote spread. Therefore, if there is fraud, the exit polls will not reflect the total shown by the machine, and it will be obvious to everyone that fraud has been committed. Whether it will be possible to do anything about that fraud is another question. - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 8 16:19:35 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i290JT2l020944; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 16:19:30 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i290JRHu020921; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 16:19:27 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 16:19:27 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Reply-To: From: "Keith Nagel" To: Subject: RE: OFF TOPIC Voting machines Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 19:44:42 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <404D00C2.E4A7B00B ix.netcom.com> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 X-Rcpt-To: Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53458 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Hi Ed. You write: >The question is, why was this not done? >The answer is that such a printed receipt would have made >possible the detection of voter fraud. It would also allow voters to prove to a third party that they voted a certain way, thus allowing for the direct sale of votes. This is why you do not receive confirmation today. This is distinct from the issue of having the machines create a tamper proof record of each transaction. What really confuses things is that the machine must provide a verifiable record of votes without identifying the voter, which would allow the government to track your voting. A printed record of the total is OK, but only if the machine can be repeatedly cycled on and off without losing count. If you read the now-public collection of emails from the Diebold development team you'll form a pretty good idea of how things came about. The warts are plenty, but not uncommon in the industry. Good security is still a black art and large corporations tend to attract the lazy... I think a bipartisan commission should investigate and regulate the production and handling of these machines, too much power is being put into the private sector and without oversight abuse is inevitable. K. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 8 18:13:01 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i292Cs2l029820; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 18:12:55 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i292CmmN029779; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 18:12:48 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 18:12:48 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 17:18:07 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: OFF TOPIC Voting machines Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ultra5.eskimo.com id i292Ce2l029718 Resent-Message-ID: <6He8OB.A.JRH.fgSTAB ultra5.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53459 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 5:00 PM 3/8/4, Jed Rothwell wrote: >Regarding voting machines and receipts, Diebold and some election officials >have claimed that it would cost a great deal of money to retrofit the >machines with printers. I recently served as election clerk, and I >discovered that these machines are already equipped with printers. The >debate has taken a surrealistic turn. I wrote a brief technical report >describing some of the difficulties we experienced at our precinct. Here is >the paragraph about printers: > >Meg Smothers of the League of Women Voters recently said that Georgia has >28,000 voting machines, and it would cost $15 million to retrofit them with >printers to produce receipts. [1] That comes to $535 per machine. Yet these >machines already have printers. They produce a paper receipt at the end of >the day showing the vote tallies. The printers are the kind used in cash >registers, and they have large rolls of paper that would easily last >through the 12 hours the polls remain open. It takes people about a minute >to cast a ballot, so one machine would need to print at most 720 receipts >per day. The printer and paper are located on the right side of the >machine, under a locked metal cover. It would be a simple matter to >fabricate a new metal equipment cover with an outlet above the printer, >that would print a receipt for the voter. Based on the retail cost of >similar metal computer equipment cases available in any computer store, >this should cost approximately $30 per machine, not $500. The programming >change would be trivial. > >- Jed > > >1. M. Smothers, "EQUAL TIME: Paper receipts no guarantee," Atlanta >Journal-Constitution op-ed page, February 23, 2004. What is the idea behind the receipt concept? If the idea is that the receipts are placed into a ballot box by the voter for purposes of a recount, and audit counts, then that may be a useful idea, and certainly anm improvement over no audit trail at all. If the voter walks out with it, then that it seems to me is a not a good idea. Back in the 80's for some time I was Chairman of the Data Processing Review Board for the South Central District (State of Alaska elections, reporting to Lt. Gov Lowell Thomas Jr, and then later to the Director of Elections) and also chairman of the Data Processing Review Board for the Municiplaity of Anchorage (Municipal elections, reporting to the Municipal Clerk). The Southcentral District is one of three election districts in Alaska. These boards were citizen boards appointed to do pre-election ballot counting software testing and verification, to oversee all election night machine ballot tabulation, to do post-election software testing, and to certify the machine counting process prior to the overall election certification. I'll just mention as a matter of general interest that under protest we were also on occasion drafted into the role of being machine operators election night, which we felt undermined our ability to actually focus on overseeing the process. It was not a reasonable requirement for a citizen review board to actually process the ballots, even though the board was selected only from the local data processing (now called IT) professionals. Fortunately at the time I was a Systems Programmer, so had plenty of actual operating experience. The ballot counting at the time was done on an IBM 370 using a card reader to read pre-printed voter-punched ballot cards. Yes, we were actually involved in placing some ballots with hanging chad into questioned status, for later manual counting! However, the voting booths had card punches which did a good job of punching, so hanging chad was very rare. We never used "manual punchout" type cards, where the chad is removed by stylus, like the ones that caused so much troubla in Florida. It is not uncommon, I think, for any such highly visible and important process to become like a three ring circus act. We have seen plenty of that in recent times. The Anchorage Municipal Clerk and I literally wrote verbatum various procedures for performance of these duties for purposes of codification into Alaska Statute, which was done. One of the things we came up with was a random selection of at least one critical race from one precinct for manual counting the night of the election. This then provided at least some kind of check on the possibility of the software being triggered to count differently in a live ballot count, and a disincentive to the comission of fraud. One of the things I considered vital in the software validation process is that the machine not have any data to indicate whether the ballots being counted were test ballots or live ballots. Further, the pre-election certification (test) counts might be run an arbitrary number of times, as might the post election certification (test) counts. We ran small tests and large tests. We developed a suite of tests. A major time consuming part of the review board's effort was the preparation of test ballots. In my opinion an election carried out without a manually verifyable (e.g. pre-printed and punched or marked, or voting-time printed) ballot, which, once in the ballot box is maintained at all times under the scrutiny of law enforcement, is not an election that can be audited or trusted. One of the key methods of auditing in Alaska was provided by the unusual state requirements we had at the time that the pre-printed ballots must rotate the candidate order. This was done because survey data showed that many voters are prone to vote for the first name on the ballot they recognize. In order to accomodate this, the ballots had punches in the first columns that identified the ballot type (if there were multiple ballot cards required, and the race rotations on the ballot.) These prepunched numbers could not be used to identify a specic unique ballot, but, in addition to factilitating rotating candidate lists, were very useful for verifying by group totals that the ballot box was not stuffed. That is because ballots sent to a precinct were pre-counted by ballot type. Unused ballots returned to the central counting location were counted and the count by ballot type added to those counted as voted. If the counts returned did not match the counts for ballots sent, then a manual audit could be triggered. Having had this experience, I feel that pre-printed ballots must be somewhat better than ballot receipts printed at voting time. Ballots should have group numbers of some kind on them for batch totalling to prevent ballot stuffing. In any event, unused ballots should be returned to a central location, and overall totals should be tallied. Pre-printed ballots also have the advantage that voting does not have to stop even if all the machines break down. If all machines are down at a voting location (an experience I had here as a voter during our last election) then the ballots can simply be placed into a ballot box for later counting, either by machine or manually. This is a procedure that was not followed here recently! Whenthe one and only scanner broke down we had to hand our ballots to a lady in plain view of all present. There was no ballot box present! The machine hopper acts like a ballot box normally. Alaska presently uses mark sense paper ballot readers, i.e self-feed scanners. My experience tells me that an election without paper ballots is an election which can not be verified or audited. It certainly can not be recounted. I think an election, to have any credibility, must provide (a) secrecy of the ballot, no way to tie the vote to the voter, and yet still provide (b) a means of validation of the process and of recount, all under the watchful eyes of the press and citizens. This means to me citizen and press access to the polling places and to the counting places, though such access might be limited to a small number of people desginated by various political parties or affiliations. It is not possible to do a thorough job in a circus like atmosphere, so direct citizen oversight has to be accomodated without the effect of direct intervention and interference in the process. It also means that there should be a ballot box protected by law enforcement, and the use of paper ballots. There must be an official chain of control of the ballots at all times, including transportation, during each counting process and during interim and final storage for a reasonable period after the election, all under the protection of law enforcement officers. It is a sad thing that the press is the WORST force against properly certifiable elections. Their voratious demand for speed in vote counting instead of accuracy in vote counting may well rob us of our democracy. Distributed machine counting, through voting machines or ballot readers, goes a long way toward meeting the demands of the press and most of the public for instant gratification election night. However, we all have a responsibility to see that solid verification comes at some point. Let the press have its moment of glory, but then here should be no race to certification. That should come at a later date. There is no hurry because challenged and absentee ballots are not tabulated election night anyway. Certification should be a rigorous unrushed process. For this reason candidates should not be quickly sworn in nor should issues determined by election be quickly acted upon in ANY event. Benefits afforded to any part by a rush to certification should be avoided as much as possible. One way to verify an election might be manual counting at the polling places. A much better way in my opinion is recounting by machine at a central location. The problem with using lots of machines distributed around all the polling locations to do the counting and/or recounting is that software testing and validating becomes nearly impossible. Voting-time printed receipts, even if placed into a ballot box and used for later recounting or auditing, would be less than ideal if such ballots were not reliably machine readable. If not placed into a protected ballot box, but rather taken from the polling place, such receipts can be taken by force from a person exiting the polling place and, if not to the mugger's satisfaction, then used as a reason to commit mayhem upon the voter. There is no election auditability provided by such receipts, due to the loss of chain of control and auditing totals, and further it corrupts the sanctity and independence of the votes. While I'm on my soapbox, I'd like to further voice a desire to see biometrics used for voter identification, e.g. face scans, retina scans or fingerprints. The technology exists now to prevent multiple voting, so why not use it? Lastly, I would like to say that in my experience the greatest threat to our elections process is not bad guys who want to take over the system. Bad guys can fairly readily be controlled if there are appropriate and not even very expensive or sophisticated measures taken. The biggest problem I personally encountered with establishing fool proof counting standards was simple naivetι. Ordinarily reasonable people could not bring themsleves to think that fraud was possible. This was true of review board members as well as overseeing politicians and others in government. This was true in spite of the fact it was the official stated duty of the board to prevent fraud or corruption in the process. Simple fraud checks, like the avoiding of setting indicators to the vote counting system, so it could differentiate between a live vs test vote count, were considered paranoid, and even offensive to suggest. Some volunteer board members simply preferred to go through the motions as quickly as possible rather than even entertain discussion about the possiblity of fraud, much less countermeasures. And of course the press demanding of the high level polititians that they speed up the process didn't help. The press doesn't like sitting around for hours at "election central" with nothing new to say or news to report. And then there were the political party types who wanted capitulation as quickly as possible election night so they could all go out and get blasted celebrating, rather than making small talk and waiting around bored in some hotel ballroom until the wee hours of the morining just for results. I've seen the enemy to dependable balloting, and that enemy is us. It is the inability of we the voters to understand what is at stake, to open our minds to to the issues and act accordingly. People simply can not accept the proposition that whenever an electronic computer, especially a programmable computer, is involved in ballot counting both fraud and miscounts can and eventually will happen. Much more likely to corrupt an election than fraud is incompetence, or even simple mistakes. Last minute coding or machine settings have to be made right before an election. Mistakes are often made - little things, like crossing the names and the ballot counts. These kinds of mistakes were actually detected by our ballot counting test suite. Without paper ballots and counting machines, test suites can not even be developed. Manual tests of voting machine tabulation can not be duplicated with accuracy, and take too long to be employed. These are not just regional or even national issues. I think one of the most pressing duties of international law is the establishment of quality election standards. I think if a good set of international standards were set, most US local, state, and national elections would fail miserably in meeting them. Even worse, more would fail each election than in prior elections. We are heading fast in the wrong direction. The secrecy and sanctity of the ballot box is eroding. And it is only going to get worse. The concept of "electronic voting", as in via the internet, is inanely foolish, but it will inevitably be tried. At one time, long ago, we could count on the integrity of the League of Women Voters and similar groups to see that ballots were counted correctly. Now who is minding the watch? Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 8 20:47:17 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i294lA2l020630; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 20:47:11 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i294l5kl020598; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 20:47:05 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 20:47:05 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 19:52:25 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: Big Martian Rock] Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53460 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 5:04 PM 3/8/4, Terry Blanton wrote: >Horace Heffner wrote: > >>It strikes me as more likely that the tool stalled. Suppose the rock is in >>fact not hard, but is thawing, especially under the pressure of the knurled >>balls. The grinder will then advance too fast and stall. >> > >Humphrey is a Spirit rock. These are mostly basalt, right? The RAT failed to grind Flat Rock, not Humphrey. That's at the Opportunity site. They'll try again on day 42. See: > >>That though crossed my mind as I clipped out the two leaf image. I was >>wondering at the time if perchance Craig Haynie edited it in there as a >>joke. >> > >Not this time. It's in the raw images from Spirit. > >>If it IS the rabbit, that thing sure makes good time travelling around. 8^) >> > >Which reminds me of an animation of the tortoise and the hare. No >matter how fast the hare ran, the tortoise always showed up ahead of >him. We find out in the end that there were a dozen tortoises (tortii?) >and they were cheating. OK, I'll keep my eye peeled for a troublesome tortoise. 8^) Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 8 20:53:19 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i294rF2l022396; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 20:53:15 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i294rEuq022375; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 20:53:14 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 20:53:14 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 19:58:45 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: Mars stems, marbles, threads Resent-Message-ID: <8LzpUC.A.idF.52UTAB ultra5.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53461 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 10:34 AM 3/8/4, Terry Blanton wrote: >Horace Heffner wrote: > >>In the original photos I thought the central stripes looked like cutter >>marks too. >> > >The tool striations are discussed here: > >http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/press/opportunity/20040225a.html > >on the second image down. The description there simply does not account for the complex structures now (barely) visible at: >http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/press/opportunity/20040305a/10-sg-03 >-mckittrick-B041R1.jpg< Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 8 21:05:38 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2955Y2l025912; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 21:05:34 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2955W9C025892; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 21:05:32 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 21:05:32 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <005a01c40594$21c5b400$6401a8c0 Craig> From: "SnowDog" To: References: Subject: Re: Big Martian Rock Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 23:04:54 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53462 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: > They're saying today that they could not cut into flat rock. Given > that the tool being used is diamond, does that mean flat > rock is a huge diamond? 8^) They could pay for the next sample > recovery mission by retrieving that one. I think this is it: http://69.57.146.76/golddirectory/mars/mars8.htm Craig Haynie From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 8 21:24:41 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i295Ob2l031560; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 21:24:37 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i295Oakg031543; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 21:24:36 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 21:24:36 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <008801c40596$d02f4a90$6401a8c0 Craig> From: "SnowDog" To: References: <005a01c40594$21c5b400$6401a8c0@Craig> Subject: Re: Big Martian Rock Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 23:24:06 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53463 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: > > They're saying today that they could not cut into flat rock. Given > > that the tool being used is diamond, does that mean flat > > rock is a huge diamond? 8^) They could pay for the next sample > > recovery mission by retrieving that one. > > I think this is it: > > http://69.57.146.76/golddirectory/mars/mars8.htm > > Craig Haynie Oh, right! FlatRock is an Opportunity rock. While I'm here, I have to comment on this thing: http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/m/039/1M131655288EFF0544P2971M2M1.JPG Two notes: 1) There's that ridge again, that appears in almost all of these things. What kind of secretion process could be so consistent with such an anomaly? 2) The object is distorted and shiny, like a ripe piece of fruit or something. I can imagine a natural process which creates a shiny surface, through either weathering, or secretion, but I cannot imagine a natural process which looks so distorted, yet has shiny parts in the surface. This is the type of thing that ones sees in plants. http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/m/041/1M131831010EFF0574P2951M2M1.JPG Another example of the ridge on the side of this thing, and it isn't a shiny one. Craig Haynie From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 8 21:32:20 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i295WC2l001215; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 21:32:16 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i295WBci001197; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 21:32:11 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 21:32:11 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <003401c40598$46efb920$c864a8c0 win98> From: To: References: Subject: Re: OFF TOPIC Voting machines Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 07:34:45 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53464 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: ----- Original Message ----- From: "Keith Nagel" To: Sent: 09 March 2004 02:44 Subject: RE: OFF TOPIC Voting machines > Hi Ed. > > You write: > >The question is, why was this not done? > >The answer is that such a printed receipt would have made > >possible the detection of voter fraud. > > It would also allow voters to prove to a third party that > they voted a certain way, thus allowing for the direct > sale of votes. This is why you do not receive confirmation > today. > > This is distinct from the issue of having the machines > create a tamper proof record of each transaction. What > really confuses things is that the machine must provide > a verifiable record of votes without identifying the voter, > which would allow the government to track your > voting. A printed record of the total is OK, but only > if the machine can be repeatedly cycled on and > off without losing count. Anonymity is not difficult to implement using cryptographical methods. For the start, let machine assign a unique number on the receipt and make publicly available this number and the corresponding vote within a list covering all used and unused votes. Cryptography ensure this receipt number is NOT somehow related to identity of the voter, but still the voter ability prove this number belong to him, and the voting system ability to prove the counted vote is belong to this number. This allow the receipt owner directly verify his vote is processed. Cryptographic methods would be implemented to ensure the voter his vote is counted properly and only real votes are counted. In principle the cryptographic system should be set in order nor the voting machines and nor an other party need be trusted. As these cryptographic methods are well known and available since long time, accepting an electronic voting system avoid from these methods and even without receipt capability is the direct evidence of malpractice against democracy. Regards, hamdi ucar From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 8 21:55:40 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i295taBd009083; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 21:55:36 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i295tY7o009062; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 21:55:34 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 21:55:34 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Reply-To: From: "Keith Nagel" To: Subject: RE: OFF TOPIC Voting machines Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 01:21:01 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <003401c40598$46efb920$c864a8c0 win98> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 X-Rcpt-To: Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53465 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Hi Hamdi. You write: >Anonymity is not difficult to implement using cryptographical methods. >For the start, let machine assign a unique number on the receipt >and make publicly available this number and the corresponding vote >within a list covering all used and unused votes. Cryptography ensure this >receipt number is NOT somehow related to identity of the voter, but still >the voter ability prove this number belong to him, and the voting system >ability to prove the counted vote is belong to this number. If I understand you correctly, I can still prove I voted Republicrat in the election. Why doesn't this allow me to sell my vote? K PS: Any word from Podkletnov? From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 8 22:16:24 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i296GLBd013639; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 22:16:21 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i296GKPV013617; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 22:16:20 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 22:16:20 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 21:21:43 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: fuzzballs Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53466 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Get a look at the fuzzballs in this Opportunity photo: >http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/m/039/1M131648609EFF0544P2951 M2M1.JPG> They appear to be dead and decaying. The one at the top right appears to have broken off from a joined pair. It sure is fuzzy on the top side. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 8 22:19:17 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i296JDBd014274; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 22:19:14 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i296JCLl014254; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 22:19:12 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 22:19:12 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 21:24:44 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: Big Martian Rock] Resent-Message-ID: <-qHXJD.A.qeD.gHWTAB ultra5.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53467 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 5:04 PM 3/8/4, Terry Blanton wrote: >Humphrey is a Spirit rock. These are mostly basalt, right? Supposedly, but I'm not so sure. Look at Craig's second photo: You can see that the RAT knurled ball (at the bottom) really dug into the rock. That seems far too soft for basalt. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 8 23:36:58 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i297asBd031537; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 23:36:54 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i297arGh031522; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 23:36:53 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 23:36:53 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: rick+highsurf.com mail.highsurf.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <008801c40596$d02f4a90$6401a8c0 Craig> References: <005a01c40594$21c5b400$6401a8c0 Craig> <008801c40596$d02f4a90$6401a8c0 Craig> Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 21:36:47 -1000 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Rick Monteverde Subject: UFO killed the Beagle? Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53468 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: http://news.scotsman.com/latest.cfm?id=2623746 - Rick From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 9 05:51:34 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i29DpQBd010277; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 05:51:26 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i29DpON5010225; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 05:51:24 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 05:51:24 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-Id: <6.0.3.0.2.20040309082502.01cc8ed0 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell mindspring.com@pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.3.0 Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 08:51:30 -0500 To: vortex-L eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: Re: OFF TOPIC Voting machines Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <5RYvkC.A.tfC.cvcTAB ultra5.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53469 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Horace Heffner writes: > What is the idea behind the receipt concept? If the idea is that the > receipts are placed into a ballot box by the voter for purposes of a > recount, and audit counts, then that may be a useful idea, and certainly > anm improvement over no audit trail at all. That's the idea. The voter would verify the paper is correct and then drop it into a ballot box. > My experience tells me that an election without paper ballots is an > election which can not be verified or audited. Right. See: http://www.verifiedvoting.org/ > It is a sad thing that the press is the WORST force against properly > certifiable elections. Their voratious demand for speed in vote counting > instead of accuracy in vote counting . . . I do not think the press is at fault. They know the outcome hours before the polls close, from exit polling. Historically, politicians were the driving force behind rapid vote counting. This tradition began in the 1850s in the US, with the spread of telegraphs. In the 1860 election, Lincoln knew the results before midnight. Information already moved as rapidly as it did in 1960. Since the 1960s, polling and computer projections have improved tremendously. Actually, that eliminates the drama for the politicians and members of the press. The only people who do not know the outcome by 3:00 p.m. are the voters. Of course very tight elections such as Florida in 2000 remain unresolved. Actually, long after that election, the New York Times and other news organizations paid a large sum of money to have the Florida votes recounted again carefully. They found that Bush won, after all. Turnout was low on March 2, so I had plenty of time to look around the room. I took note of the data being collected, and what may or may not be recorded in the machines. (No one outside of Diebold knows.) If individual transaction records are stored, I figured out some rather simple ways to correlate voters with ballots, in order to buy votes. - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 9 06:06:22 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i29E6IBd014952; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 06:06:19 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i29E6GZF014929; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 06:06:16 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 06:06:16 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <000c01c405e0$137a1e80$c864a8c0 win98> From: To: References: Subject: Re: OFF TOPIC Voting machines Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 16:08:46 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53470 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: ----- Original Message ----- From: "Keith Nagel" To: Sent: 09 March 2004 08:21 Subject: RE: OFF TOPIC Voting machines > Hi Hamdi. > > You write: > >Anonymity is not difficult to implement using cryptographic methods. > >For the start, let machine assign a unique number on the receipt > >and make publicly available this number and the corresponding vote > >within a list covering all used and unused votes. Cryptography ensure this > >receipt number is NOT somehow related to identity of the voter, but still > >the voter ability prove this number belong to him, and the voting system > >ability to prove the counted vote is belong to this number. > > If I understand you correctly, I can still prove I voted Republicrat > in the election. Why doesn't this allow me to sell my vote? > > K It depends to the scheme of how the receipt number is produced. Seller must prove the receipt number is really belong to him, because it may possible to find somebody else's receipts in trash cans. For example the receipt number may embed a hashed value of a secret phrase (a long string) that only voter knows, therefore it can prove to buyer or to voting system by telling this phrase. Public key encryption surely will provide more smart solutions and will even allow voter authenticity without exposing his secret phrase. > PS: Any word from Podkletnov? > Unfortunately, no. Regards, hamdi ucar From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 9 07:08:41 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i29F8aBd002164; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 07:08:37 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i29F8WSi002141; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 07:08:32 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 07:08:32 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 06:13:55 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: Big Martian Rock Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53471 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 11:24 PM 3/8/4, SnowDog wrote: >While I'm here, I have to comment on this thing: > >http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/m/039/1M131655288EFF0544P2971M >2M1.JPG > >Two notes: > >1) There's that ridge again, that appears in almost all of these things. >What kind of secretion process could be so consistent with such an anomaly? Try freezing and thawing. Frost on the berry. It thaws. It's wet. > >2) The object is distorted and shiny, like a ripe piece of fruit or >something. I can imagine a natural process which creates a shiny surface, >through either weathering, or secretion, but I cannot imagine a natural >process which looks so distorted, yet has shiny parts in the surface. This >is the type of thing that ones sees in plants. > >http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/m/041/1M131831010EFF0574P2951M >2M1.JPG > >Another example of the ridge on the side of this thing, and it isn't a shiny >one. > >Craig Haynie It getting frustrating, but I'll try too make the case yet again. There are lots of features of terrestrial lichen in the Mars photos. Examples: Little balls on stalks in sulpherous environment: Lots of little balls with holes in the ends sitting on the surface: Little balls with EXACTLY the same surface features as seen on Mars see: Or if you want to see shiney wet fruiting bodies see: It just does not take a lot of imagination to see that a species of lichen with many of these combined qualites could evolve. Lichen can grow on rocks or sand. It is self-sufficient, given a source of light, minerals, and water. It can grow in artic conditions and high altitudes. Some species can even grow at Mars atmospheric pressure. This is a just a nobrainer. The NASA people should buy the lichen book advertised at or better yet get the experts themselves. The only real strech of imagination required is to see that all that white stuff showing up in the photos is frozen water. As for the problem grinding Flat Rock, I guess it is simply pretty hard to grind a sponge-like material with a low power grinder designed to be positioned on hard rock. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 9 07:16:56 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i29FGnBd004640; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 07:16:50 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i29FGmOA004621; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 07:16:48 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 07:16:48 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 06:22:14 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: OFF TOPIC Voting machines Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53472 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 8:51 AM 3/9/4, Jed Rothwell wrote: > > > It is a sad thing that the press is the WORST force against properly > > certifiable elections. Their voratious demand for speed in vote counting > > instead of accuracy in vote counting . . . > >I do not think the press is at fault. They know the outcome hours before >the polls close, from exit polling. Historically, politicians were the >driving force behind rapid vote counting. In my experience this was not the case. The press demanded quicker results (from the politicians in office). They got it at the expense of reduced trustworthyness of the election results. It is ultimately the politicians that effect the changes in technology, but they are highly motivated by a critical press. If the press were pushing for quality instead of pushing for speed we'd get quality instead of speed. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 9 07:18:53 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i29FIlBd005448; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 07:18:48 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i29FIlWG005435; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 07:18:47 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 07:18:47 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 06:24:15 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: OFF TOPIC Voting machines Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53473 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 4:08 PM 3/9/4, wrote: > Public key encryption surely will >provide more smart solutions and will even allow voter authenticity without >exposing >his secret phrase. Absolutely NO public key system can be trusted. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 9 08:57:44 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i29GvbBd005703; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 08:57:39 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i29GvVLr005664; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 08:57:31 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 08:57:31 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <005201c405f7$7de90260$8837fea9 cpq> From: "Jones Beene" To: "vortex" Subject: Re: UFO killed the Beagle? Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 08:56:39 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ultra5.eskimo.com id i29GvGBd005579 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53474 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Arf... Shades of Mars Polar Lander, Euro-style. Absolutely bizarre how blame-shifting evasiveness seems semi-official and ingrained at all levels and nationalities. Why not just blame Satan ? Equally bizarre: why hadn't they learned from NASA's recent past and prepared a ready-made "whipping boy," waiting in the wings? Satan makes about as much scientific sense as a UFO (and might even create just as catchy a headline to sell your newspaper)... esp/ if they could find "666" was written somewhere on the craft... but I guess, thanks to such non sequiturs as Operation-Iraqi-Freedom, "evil" itself doesn't automatically entitle one to the same level of increased-funding (in-the-face-of-abject-failure) that it once did. ... or (if Satan is too declasse for the Euro-secularists) what about the situation being the fault of a ghost ... yes, yes... a Yankee ghost to boot... how about Snoopy say, or what about the ghost of one of LBJ's Beagles (was it Him or Her). Don't we find it equally (even more) astounding when that they do admit to the possibility that Beagle 2 succumbed to human error, it was only that it " simply crashed onto the surface of Mars because the atmosphere on the planet was less dense than expected." Whoa! How could they not have that number pegged to 10 decimal points... Heads would have already rolled in private industry - where at least there is some degree of accountability (at the lower levels, at least)... and of course the Japanese have the good sense, if someone had miscalculated the Mars atmospheric density to such an extent that it caused such a devastating failure and loss of face ... well, here in the States that remedy, as effective as it is, only brings to mind the name of a sportscaster. But, isn't it ironic that the massive cost of this failure has insulated the perpetrator beyond all reproach.... and gotten the wheels of mass-denial in full motion. In December 1999 when contact with the Mars Polar Lander was never regained after its scheduled touchdown, NASA not only had a "whipping boy" waiting for just that king of tragedy ("software glitch" and/or "budget cuts") they had a "failure review board" already picked, or so it seems. But even that is not enough. At that level, you need to *benefit* from your worst mistakes in order to stay ahead of the game. So, later when blame was diverted and funding levels needed to be replenished, it was leaked that a spy satellite from the mysterious "National Imagery and Mapping Agency (NIMA)" has been quietly scanning Mars pictures," According to a "source close to the NIMA" (i.e. a planned leak), photographic specialists think they spotted something very unusual (more intrigue and vague innuendo). But NASA officials quickly counter that it's too early to tell... and then the story fades to black (of course, maybe they had spotted the same UFO that got to Beagle). However if you want bizarre preplanned excuses, I had recently be planning to post one to vortex for the benefit of future NASA missions - one that would top them all - "Mar's sinister secret" it could be called (a left-handed chirality on Mars ?). But I'll save that one for a slow day... Jones From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 9 09:08:40 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i29H8aBd009870; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 09:08:36 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i29H8YBh009851; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 09:08:34 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 09:08:34 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <404DFAE0.6044346A ix.netcom.com> Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 09:12:01 -0800 From: Edmund Storms Organization: Energy K System X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77C-CCK-MCD {C-UDP; EBM-APPLE} (Macintosh; U; PPC) X-Accept-Language: en,pdf MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: OFF TOPIC Voting machines References: <6.0.3.0.2.20040308183608.01ce5718 pop.mindspring.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53475 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Jed Rothwell wrote: > Edmund Storms wrote: > > > I suggest that when reality is being distorted, someone has something to > gain > > by the lie. Obviously, Diebold could have added the feature Jed is > suggesting > > for trivial cost when the machines were manufactured. The question is, why > > was this not done? The answer is that such a printed receipt would have > made > > possible the detection of voter fraud. > > Many people have realized this by now, including several senators, > congressmen, and secretaries of state (the local election officials). > Congress is likely to pass a law making printed receipts mandatory, > possibly before the next election. Several states have rejected the > machines. The Diebold Corporation has alarmed many people lately, which may > trigger action on this bill. The Chief Executive Officer is the head of the > local Republican party and a major contributor. In a recent fund-raising > letter he said he is "committed to helping Ohio deliver its electoral votes > to the president next year." Also, a large chunk of the secret source code > for the Diebold machine was found on the Internet at a Diebold corporate > site in a file called "rob-georgia" -- a suspicious moniker, to say the > least. (Georgia was the first state to adopt these machines, and soon after > they were brought in several election results came out quite unexpectedly, > in my opinion.) Some programmers who have seen the code describe it as > amateur-looking impenetrable "spaghetti code." I would be more reassured when I see widespread rejection of the machines. Instead, I see favorable articles and great praise. While people of knowledge, such as yourself, raise concerns occasionally, I see no indication that such facts are having any effect on the eventual use of the machines. As Keith points out, most people do not have a clue about the reality, instead see only the convenience. In addition, powerful people have been given a useful tool for getting their way. This tool will not be given up easily by either the ignorant or the powerful no matter how much reality is argued by the experts. > > > > Therefore, I predict we are witnessing > > the destruction of democracy as we know it. > > That is too extreme, in my opinion. We are seeing a threat to democracy. > Similar threats have often arisen in the past. The US has a long history of > vote fraud, ballot stuffing, dead people voting and other election day > shenanigans. This is merely the latest high tech version of an old shell game. All very true. However, as time goes by, all faults of society grow in magnitude. At what level do the faults become so large that the society in general is put at risk? I suggest that universal use of such machines is not like the past when a few elections were rigged. Now, all elections can be rigged in a way that average people will not understand. Once an election is rigged, the people who are "elected" using this tool will have a great self interest in maintaining the flaw that got them "elected". Who will then have the power to correct the system? > > > > The company provides software that tallies the > > vote. No one is allowed to see the software because it is proprietary. The > > voting tally is provided so fast and easily that no one questions the > numbers, > > nor do they have any way to check the values even if they were suspicious. > > The winner is announced on the same day as the voting and everyone goes back > > to their lives satisfied that we have finally created a perfect system > with no > > messy court decisions or ambiguous ballots. > > This can only happen if the vote is very close. In every major election, > all over the country, the press stations thousands of people taking exit > polls, and these exit polls record the vote at each sample precinct to > within a percent. Usually the margin of error is smaller than the vote > spread. Therefore, if there is fraud, the exit polls will not reflect the > total shown by the machine, and it will be obvious to everyone that fraud > has been committed. Whether it will be possible to do anything about that > fraud is another question. This is a good point. However, if Bush can be elected when it is obvious, based on actual vote count that he was defeated, what effect would you expect from a few exit polls done by people who would be rejected because they were said to be partisan? If we had a healthy system, I would agree with your optimism. However, we do not have a healthy system, but one that keeps getting sicker. Ask yourself, why are the elections so close when most voters are clearly not voting consistent with their self interests? Why is the average person so deluded about so many aspects of reality? What happens to a society when its policies are based on delusion rather than on reality? Ed > > > - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 9 09:11:10 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i29HB3Bd010726; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 09:11:04 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i29HB2jg010710; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 09:11:02 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 09:11:02 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <000501c405f9$dfc5e320$c864a8c0 win98> From: To: Subject: OT: An Anomalous SETI Signal Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 19:13:28 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53476 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/updates/2004/mar/m08-007.shtml 1) See http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap040307.html and hear the signal (http://www.setileague.org/software/unknown2.wav) 2) See http://www.abcfield.force9.co.uk/bcornet/bcornet10.html and hear the sound record wav18 (http://www.abcfield.force9.co.uk/bcornet/Wav18.wav) The high pitch background sound at wav18 sound very similar. I have also another wav from that site with similar to seti signal but I did not yet found the web link. Regards, hamdi ucar From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 9 09:54:54 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i29HskBd031890; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 09:54:46 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i29Hsc1t031731; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 09:54:38 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 09:54:38 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <404E04DA.5020109 rtpatlanta.com> Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 12:54:34 -0500 From: "Terry Blanton" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: OT: An Anomalous SETI Signal References: <000501c405f9$dfc5e320$c864a8c0 win98> In-Reply-To: <000501c405f9$dfc5e320$c864a8c0 win98> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53477 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: hamdix iris.com.tr wrote: >I have also another wav from that site with similar to seti signal but I did not >yet found the web link. > It reminds me of Dr. McCoy's body scanner on Star Trek. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 9 10:30:09 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i29IU6Bd011540; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 10:30:06 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i29IU3Qf011498; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 10:30:03 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 10:30:03 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <404E0D22.5030207 rtpatlanta.com> Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 13:29:54 -0500 From: "Terry Blanton" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: UFO killed the Beagle? References: <005a01c40594$21c5b400$6401a8c0@Craig> <008801c40596$d02f4a90$6401a8c0@Craig> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53478 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Rick Monteverde wrote: >http://news.scotsman.com/latest.cfm?id=2623746 > Here's the piccy: http://www.beagle2.com/resources/down-separation.htm From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 9 11:28:43 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i29JScBd007366; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 11:28:38 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i29JSYO5007339; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 11:28:34 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 11:28:34 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-Id: <6.0.3.0.2.20040309142712.01cc9088 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell mindspring.com@pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.3.0 Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 14:28:27 -0500 To: vortex-L eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: A relatively easy CF experiment from 1991 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53479 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: See: http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/RoutRKcopiouslow.pdf I have asked the author for better pictures of the autoradiographs in this paper. - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 9 12:06:14 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i29K69Bd018325; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 12:06:10 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i29K64vF018294; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 12:06:04 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 12:06:04 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-Id: <6.0.3.0.2.20040309143810.01ce54a0 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell mindspring.com@pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.3.0 Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 15:05:43 -0500 To: vortex-L eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: Re: OFF TOPIC Voting machines Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53480 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Edmund Storms writes: > I would be more reassured when I see widespread rejection of the machines. > Instead, I see favorable articles and great praise. While people of knowledge, > such as yourself, raise concerns occasionally, I see no indication that such facts > are having any effect on the eventual use of the machines. There are many indications that changes will be made soon. Maryland has rejected the machines. California is demanding a paper receipt, in California is the largest market, so it will probably set the standard for everyone. Dozens of articles criticizing the machine have appeared in widely read publications including the New York Times, the Atlanta Journal, and Wired magazine. US congressmen and senators have introduced bills demanding paper receipts. A similar bill is under consideration in the Georgia State Senate. Finally, here is a funny animated cartoon about the subject: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/gate/archive/2004/02/04/fiorevoting.DTL > This tool will not be given up easily by either the ignorant > or the powerful no matter how much reality is argued by the experts. The campaign against the machines is rapidly gaining ground, as far as I can tell. > All very true. However, as time goes by, all faults of society grow in magnitude. Perhaps, but so do the solutions sometimes. The first worldwide epidemic to spread rapidly via modern transportation came in 1918. It killed roughly 50 million people, which was more than the four years of war preceding it. The speed and scope of transportation has increased tremendously since then, yet the recent SARS and avian influenza outbreaks were both stopped dead, even though we have no vaccine for either disease. Also, it is hard to imagine social faults or malign technologies worse than those of World War I and WWII, which included everything from machine guns and poison gas to nuclear weapons. There has not been a World War III, and I doubt there ever will be. People seem to be learning a lesson. I think is obvious that people do learn, and societies do change, since the world has changed so many times in the past 5,000 years. > Once an election is rigged, the people who are > "elected" using this tool will have a great self interest in maintaining the flaw > that got them "elected". Who will then have the power to correct the system? The voters will still have power. You can only rig an election to a certain extent. Anything over 5% would be obvious from pre-election polling and exit polling. There would be widespread riots and a police investigation of the machines. > > > The company provides software that tallies the > > > vote. No one is allowed to see the software because it is proprietary. The > > > voting tally is provided so fast and easily that no one questions the > > numbers . . . People are questioning the numbers all over the US, and in the Congress! > This is a good point. However, if Bush can be elected when it is obvious, based > on actual vote count that he was defeated . . . That is incorrect. The New York Times and other news organizations paid for a careful recount of the Florida ballots, and they determined that Bush did, in fact, win. He did not win a plurality of votes in the entire US, but that is because of the Constitution and the Electoral College. - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 9 12:35:18 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i29KZABd027818; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 12:35:12 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i29KZ6aj027785; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 12:35:06 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 12:35:06 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-Id: <6.0.3.0.2.20040309153352.01cf2878 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell mindspring.com@pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.3.0 Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 15:34:52 -0500 To: vortex-L eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: A relatively easy CF experiment from 1991 - again Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53481 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Here the URL again: http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/RoutRKcopiouslow.pdf I do not know why this e-mail program has been repeating the hyperlink like that. - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 9 12:53:26 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i29KrMBZ002361; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 12:53:23 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i29KrLaD002339; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 12:53:21 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 12:53:21 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 11:58:40 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: OFF TOPIC Voting machines Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53482 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: It would be very interesting to see the outcome of a civil suit, which is based upon the preponderance of evidence, demanding a new election for a close race based on the fact that there is polling evidence which shows that the election results are bogus, or based on the closeness of a race, and the fact that there is no recount available. I seems to me it is clear malfeasance to not provide a means of election validation and recount. It would be of great interest how a jury which has heard expert testimony would decide. It would set an enormously important precident. Can you imagine the scamble to produce paper records if such a suit prevailed? Running an entire election is far more expensive than doing a recount. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 9 14:19:46 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i29MJhBZ031815; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 14:19:43 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i29MJaCq031759; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 14:19:36 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 14:19:36 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 17:18:02 -0500 From: Norman Horwood <100060.173 compuserve.com> Subject: Re: Warning about your e-mail account. Sender: Norman Horwood <100060.173 compuserve.com> To: "vortex-l eskimo.com" Message-ID: <200403091718_MC3-1-7534-B63D compuserve.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ultra5.eskimo.com id i29MJPBZ031675 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53484 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: I note your comments about interference with email. Can you please change my email address from my Compuserve address i.e. 100060,173 to my Internet address namely: norman.horwood btinternet.com I find that the spam control is far better now that BT seem to have introduced good spam filtering at their server. Thank you, Norman Horwood From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 9 19:21:25 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2A3LHl8028445; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 19:21:21 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2A3LArC028387; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 19:21:10 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 19:21:10 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f From: Standing Bear To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: OT: An Anomalous SETI Signal Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 22:27:39 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <000501c405f9$dfc5e320$c864a8c0 win98> In-Reply-To: <000501c405f9$dfc5e320$c864a8c0 win98> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200403092227.39233.rockcast earthlink.net> Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53485 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: On Tuesday 09 March 2004 12:13, hamdix iris.com.tr wrote: > http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/updates/2004/mar/m08-007.shtml > > 1) See http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap040307.html and hear the signal > (http://www.setileague.org/software/unknown2.wav) > > 2) See http://www.abcfield.force9.co.uk/bcornet/bcornet10.html and hear the > sound record wav18 (http://www.abcfield.force9.co.uk/bcornet/Wav18.wav) > > The high pitch background sound at wav18 sound very similar. > > I have also another wav from that site with similar to seti signal but I > did not yet found the web link. > > Regards, > > hamdi ucar Hello All, Very strange that signal. I use linux for all my internet activity, so have more than the usual amount of audio software and all of it free. I have a program called XMMS. There is a libiris plug in for it that provides a '3D analyzer'. The output of this file when played into this plug in for the sound program comes up with a series of geometric figures in three dimensional space. One is a green as grass lissajous pattern that looks as if made of a round 'lady finger' composed of interlocking sine waves woven into the lissajoux. Another is a square kind of checkerboard that shrinks and grows. And rotates in a three dimensional field. There are others. Those of you that use Linux 9 from S.u.S.E. and have XMMS can see for yourselves. Perhaps there is a local logical explanation for this akin to the visualizer in windows media player. The Iris plug-in was called an 'analyzer' and not a visualizer though. Standing Bear rockcast earthlink.net From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 9 22:37:21 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2A6bIl8011267; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 22:37:18 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2A6bE3e011243; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 22:37:14 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 22:37:14 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 00:38:06 -0600 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: thomas malloy Subject: Re: FW: WHAT'S NEW Friday, March 05, 2004 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-DCC-CPI-Metrics: Clear 1161; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53486 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: >At 10:01 PM 3/5/4, Rick Monteverde wrote: >>Parksie writes: >> >>>The >>>only place a missile could be coming from is Russia, and that's >>> why we still maintain a deterrent. >> >> >>Has this guy ever heard of North Korea? Honolulu, among others, could be >>that city. We're within range. >> >>- Rick > >So is much of Alaska, including the Alyeska Pipeline, Anchorage and my >little hometown Palmer. > >Regards, > >Horace Heffner It's the whole West Coast that's within range. I noticed that Parksie couldn't resist taking a swipe at sonofusion. I wonder what I can find on the LENR-CANR website if I searched under sonofusion and radio neuclide remediation. > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 9 23:08:28 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2A78Ol8016404; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 23:08:24 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2A78Nfd016389; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 23:08:23 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 23:08:23 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.1.4.030702.0 Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 02:11:30 -0500 Subject: Park still twitching From: "Eugene F. Mallove" To: "vortex l eskimo.com" Message-ID: Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ultra5.eskimo.com id i2A78Ll8016354 Resent-Message-ID: <0g5J0B.A.BAE.m7rTAB ultra5.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53487 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: The more things change, the more they stay the same... - Gene Mallove www.infinite-energy.com >From Robert Park's What's New WHAT'S NEW, Friday, 5 May 1989 Washington, DC 1. THE CORPSE OF COLD FUSION WILL PROBABLY CONTINUE TO TWITCH for awhile, even after two nights of unrelenting assaults at the APS Baltimore Meeting. Perhaps the most devastating paper was by Cal Tech chemist Nathan Lewis. Scientists attempting to replicate the Pons-Fleishmann experiment reconstructed the Utah "fusion" cell from press photographs, calibrating by the width of Pon's wrist. It is at the same time amusing and outrageous. The details have presumably been shared only with companies that sign a contract with the University of Utah. Pons and Fleishmann said they were too busy preparing for a Congressional visit (WN 28 Apr 89) to speak in Baltimore. However, Pons was rumored to be in Washington this week to meet with White House Chief of Staff John Sununu. A call to Sununu's office to check out the rumor produced one of those exquisite exchanges that make life in Washington enjoyable: "Is Gov. Sununu to meet with Professor Pons?" we asked, "I cannot confirm that," the voice replied, "since the meeting is private." But when the time came, Sununu stood Pons up. Fortunes change. WHAT'S NEW, Friday, 14 July 1989 Washington, DC 4. THE CORPSE OF COLD FUSION FINALLY STOPPED TWITCHING THIS WEEK when the DOE Cold Fusion Panel drafted its interim report. It took only four pages to establish that no persuasive evidence of cold fusion exists and that new efforts to find cold fusion are not justified. The panel carefully distinguished between reports of cold fusion at very low levels, which might justify modest support, and claims of cold fusion producing measurable excess energy, for which no substantial expenditure is recommended. Friday, March 5, 2004 3. BUBBLE FUSION: CORPSE OF "SONOFUSION" IS SAID TO BE TWITCHING. A new claim of desktop fusion from collapsing bubbles is coming out. ItΉs been two years since Taleyarken et al. at Oak Ridge National Laboratory reported in Science magazine that they had observed 2.5 MeV neutron peaks correlated with sonoluminescence from collapsing bubbles (WN 01 Mar 02), but others could not confirm their results. By mid summer the bubble had burst (WN 26 Jul 02). That was remarkably similar to the lifetime of cold fusion. But now Taleyarken has new results that some say are more convincing. Perhaps we should wait for independent confirmation. Cold fusion, of course, still has believers, but not much confirmation. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Mar 10 00:03:52 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2A83nl8025354; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 00:03:49 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2A83lPL025335; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 00:03:47 -0800 Resent-Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 00:03:47 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Reply-To: From: "Don Wiegel" To: "'vortex l eskimo.com'" Subject: MARS Spirit .. CD Rock? Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 01:03:44 -0700 Message-ID: <000001c40676$366012b0$0100a8c0 DonWLap> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.3416 Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53488 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: A "VERY VERY" Round rock? Is being shown in some of the latest Photos. Panoramic Camera :: Sol 065 http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/p/065/2P132133848ESF1500P25 34R2M1.JPG http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/p/065/2P132133713ESF1500P25 34L4M1.JPG Microscopic Imager: http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/m/065/2M132132493EFF1500P29 58M2M1.JPG From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Mar 10 05:59:29 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2ADxRHY006320; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 05:59:27 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2ADxHei006290; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 05:59:17 -0800 Resent-Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 05:59:17 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-Id: <6.0.3.0.2.20040310085700.01cc8ca0 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell mindspring.com@pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.3.0 Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 08:59:21 -0500 To: vortex-L eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: WAY OFF TOPIC Woman tries to use a million dollar bill in Wal-mart Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53489 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: This really happened, here in Atlanta. See: http://www.ajc.com/metro/content/metro/0304a/10fakebill.html# It goes to show how dumb people can be. - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Mar 10 06:53:36 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2AErTHY012769; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 06:53:35 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2AErSXb012753; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 06:53:28 -0800 Resent-Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 06:53:28 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 05:59:10 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: MARS Spirit .. CD Rock? Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53490 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 1:03 AM 3/10/4, Don Wiegel wrote: >A "VERY VERY" Round rock? Is being shown in some of the latest Photos. > > >Panoramic Camera :: Sol 065 > >http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/p/065/2P132133848ESF1500P25 >34R2M1.JPG > > >http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/p/065/2P132133713ESF1500P25 >34L4M1.JPG > > >Microscopic Imager: > >http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/m/065/2M132132493EFF1500P29 >58M2M1.JPG That may actually be an impression in the "soil" and not a disk. It looks like the front end of a spectrometer was pushed into the ground there. Note that the shadow at the top goes the wrong direction for the thing to be a disk. Compare to the rock shadows. The thing I find most interesting is that the soil has a crust that looks like crustose lichen, like some of the soil at the Opportunity site. It also compresses like lichen, showing the white flat compressed frost-like mottled surface like the Opportunity photos. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Mar 10 07:21:18 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2AFLFHY017210; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 07:21:15 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2AFL9I0017186; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 07:21:09 -0800 Resent-Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 07:21:09 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <001801c406b3$51497de0$c828010a arghou.argcorp.argworldwide.com> From: "SnowDog" To: Subject: Re: [Off Topic] Big Martian Rock Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 15:21:10 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0015_01C406B3.50FD32A0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Mar 2004 15:21:11.0439 (UTC) FILETIME=[51CB09F0:01C406B3] Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53491 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0015_01C406B3.50FD32A0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > >1) There's that ridge again, that appears in almost all of these = things. > >What kind of secretion process could be so consistent with such an anomaly? > > Try freezing and thawing. Frost on the berry. It thaws. It's wet. [...] > It getting frustrating, but I'll try too make the case yet again. = There > are lots of features of terrestrial lichen in the Mars photos. = Examples: Horace, I'm with you, but this is my point. The NASA explanation doesn't = yet make sense to me. They're moving Opportunity over to 'Blueberry Bowl' = where they will run the APX on the blue berries. I'm betting that they're not going to find what they think they're going to find. Craig Haynie (Houston) ------=_NextPart_000_0015_01C406B3.50FD32A0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> >1)=20 There's that ridge again, that appears in almost all of these = things.
>=20 >What kind of secretion process could be so consistent with such=20 an
anomaly?
>
> Try freezing and thawing.  Frost on = the=20 berry.  It thaws.  It's wet.

[...]

> It = getting=20 frustrating, but I'll try too make the case yet again.  = There
> are=20 lots of features of terrestrial lichen in the Mars photos. =20 Examples:

Horace, I'm with you, but this is my point. The NASA=20 explanation doesn't yet
make sense to me. They're moving Opportunity = over to=20 'Blueberry Bowl' where
they will run the APX on the blue berries. I'm = betting=20 that they're not
going to find what they think they're going to=20 find.

Craig Haynie = (Houston)

------=_NextPart_000_0015_01C406B3.50FD32A0-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Mar 10 08:08:43 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2AG8aEu013011; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 08:08:37 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2AG8OV2012943; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 08:08:24 -0800 Resent-Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 08:08:24 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <001201c406b9$d5a6c790$c450ccd1 MIKEBY3NR533HT> From: "Mike Carrell" To: References: <001801c406b3$51497de0$c828010a arghou.argcorp.argworldwide.com> Subject: Re: [Off Topic] Big Martian Rock Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 11:07:42 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53492 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Craig wrote: > >1) There's that ridge again, that appears in almost all of these things. > >What kind of secretion process could be so consistent with such an anomaly? > > Try freezing and thawing. Frost on the berry. It thaws. It's wet. [...] > It getting frustrating, but I'll try too make the case yet again. There > are lots of features of terrestrial lichen in the Mars photos. Examples: Horace, I'm with you, but this is my point. The NASA explanation doesn't yet make sense to me. They're moving Opportunity over to 'Blueberry Bowl' where they will run the APX on the blue berries. I'm betting that they're not going to find what they think they're going to find. ---------------------- MC: Try budding for size. An image that was discussed a while back shows a bluberry resting on a rock surface, with a well formed bulge on one side demarked by a clean line, as if a smaller sphere were trying to push out from inside the larger sphere. In the shadow below there is a strong suggestion of filaments extending from the bud to the 'rock' below. One could dismiss the filaments, extept for the robust-appearing stalk holding a blueberry above the ground surface in another recent image. Horace may be on target comparing these to lichens and fruiting bodies. However, there are bacteria that reproduce by budding. Fruiting bodies are, I believe, spore-dispersers. Terrestrial models are proper for showing what is possible, but Martian life is by definition exotic. The solar energy input is less than here, so the life processes may be much slower; that does not mean they stop. Mike Carrell From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Mar 10 09:07:22 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2AH7E8v026927; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 09:07:15 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2AH7Bmq026909; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 09:07:11 -0800 Resent-Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 09:07:11 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 11:07:48 -0600 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: thomas malloy Subject: Ed's opinion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-DCC-CPI-Metrics: Clear 1161; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 Resent-Message-ID: <59dRiB.A.ZkG._s0TAB ultra5.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53493 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: With regards to our democracy being stolen Ed Storms opined, and Jed Rothwell responded > Therefore, I predict we are witnessing > the destruction of democracy as we know it. That is too extreme, in my opinion. We are seeing a threat to democracy. Similar Ed's pessimism reminds me of my Dad, I used to say, what's your pessimistic opinion? From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Mar 10 10:13:31 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2AIDRm5015968; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 10:13:29 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2AIDCOM015919; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 10:13:12 -0800 Resent-Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 10:13:12 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <404F5B99.B0513991 ix.netcom.com> Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 10:16:57 -0800 From: Edmund Storms Organization: Energy K System X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77C-CCK-MCD {C-UDP; EBM-APPLE} (Macintosh; U; PPC) X-Accept-Language: en,pdf MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Ed's opinion References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53494 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: thomas malloy wrote: > With regards to our democracy being stolen > > Ed Storms opined, and Jed Rothwell responded > > > Therefore, I predict we are witnessing > > the destruction of democracy as we know it. > > That is too extreme, in my opinion. We are seeing a threat to > democracy. Similar > > Ed's pessimism reminds me of my Dad, I used to say, what's your > pessimistic opinion? I excuse my pessimism, as I'm sure your Dad did in the same way, by pointing out the fact that I have lived long enough to see the major trend, something younger people have not had time to see. Trends go through cycles with a time constant that is longer than individual experience, so it takes a lifetime for an individual to gain enough experience to see them. Granted Jed, who is a student of history, can point out that the trends always reverse, which is true. However, they will not reverse in my lifetime, which is the fact that is important to me and a fact that should be important to the present generation. As I'm sure Horace would agree, if age has any benefit, it allows a person to distill truth from bullshit, of which there is a great quantity these days. Young people tend to believe the bullshit because they have no reason to think their respected elders would lie. Only experience removes these optimistic myths. As a result the old get short tempered and pessimistic because they recognize the lies, the incompetence, and the eventual disaster. Once things get bad enough, changes are made, but this is only after many optimistic people are hurt. I, for one, am too old to afford optimism, although I prefer it to pessimism. Ed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Mar 10 11:06:19 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2AJ6Em1026694; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 11:06:14 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2AJ6Dew026670; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 11:06:13 -0800 Resent-Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 11:06:13 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <002101c406d3$338903a0$c864a8c0 win98> From: To: References: Subject: Re: MARS Spirit .. CD Rock? Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 21:09:08 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53495 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: ----- Original Message ----- From: "Horace Heffner" To: Sent: 10 March 2004 16:59 Subject: Re: MARS Spirit .. CD Rock? > At 1:03 AM 3/10/4, Don Wiegel wrote: > >A "VERY VERY" Round rock? Is being shown in some of the latest Photos. > > > > > >Panoramic Camera :: Sol 065 > > > >http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/p/065/2P132133848ESF1500P25 > >34R2M1.JPG > > > > > >http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/p/065/2P132133713ESF1500P25 > >34L4M1.JPG > > > > > >Microscopic Imager: > > > >http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/m/065/2M132132493EFF1500P29 > >58M2M1.JPG > > That may actually be an impression in the "soil" and not a disk. It looks > like the front end of a spectrometer was pushed into the ground there. > Note that the shadow at the top goes the wrong direction for the thing to > be a disk. Compare to the rock shadows. You are right on that. See sol 64 picture of this spot before mark is created: http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/f/064/2F132046391EFF1500P1210R0M1.HTML and the picture how the mark is being created: http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/f/065/2F132128242EDN1500P1121L0M1.HTML It is remarkable that brightness of the soil increased so much by the impression and digging making it so darker. It is also interesting if this was not made by the rover, it very probable that somebody propose a reasonable answer relied to a natural process. > > The thing I find most interesting is that the soil has a crust that looks > like crustose lichen, like some of the soil at the Opportunity site. It > also compresses like lichen, showing the white flat compressed frost-like > mottled surface like the Opportunity photos. > > Regards, > > Horace Heffner Regards, hamdi ucar From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Mar 10 13:58:55 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2ALwnm1026909; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 13:58:49 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2ALweeo026858; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 13:58:40 -0800 Resent-Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 13:58:40 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-Id: <6.0.3.0.2.20040310144734.01cc9428 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell mindspring.com@pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.3.0 Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 16:35:14 -0500 To: vortex-L eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: Re: Ed's opinion Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53496 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Edmund Storms writes: > I excuse my pessimism, as I'm sure your Dad did in the same way, by > pointing out the fact that I have lived long enough to see the major > trend, something younger people have not had time to see. Trends go > through cycles with a time constant that is longer than individual > experience, so it takes a lifetime for an individual to gain enough > experience to see them. As far as I know, older people are no more pessimistic or optimistic than younger people. Apparently, life teaches different lessons to different people. It is widely believed that older people are more conservative than younger people. In other words, conventional wisdom has it that people become more conservative as they age. This is probably a myth. Public opinion research shows that people tend to form political opinions in their youth and hold them the rest of their lives. This is why people in their eighties tend to be more liberal than those in their twenties today. The old people came of age during the Great Depression when New Deal liberal policies were popular with the majority of voters. Large numbers of people seldom change their political views except in response to a traumatic historical upheaval such as the Great Depression or WWII. In science, we expect Young Turks to champion new discoveries and push for changes, while the old fight a losing battle for the status quo. Perhaps this is the natural order of things, since young people come along after old people, and they are tabula rasa, with no stake in the present order and nothing to lose by championing new ideas. But, as we have seen, in cold fusion old scientists have taken the lead, while young ones resist change. This is a generational role reversal. I think it was caused by the traumatic events of the 1930s and 1940s, the very same forces that created all those octogenarian New Dealers. Freeman Dyson wrote: ". . . [The] experiences of World War II made an indelible impression on people of my generation. At the bottom of our hearts we still believe you can have anything you want in five years if you need it badly enough and if you are prepared to slog your way through the barriers of confusion and incompetence to get it. . . . The accepted wisdom says that, no matter what we decide to do about economic problems, we cannot expect to see any substantial results [for 15 years]. The accepted wisdom is no doubt correct, if we continue to play the game by the rules of today. But anyone who lived through World War II knows that the rules can be changed very fast when the necessity arises." Perhaps such reversals have been more common in the past than we realize. > Granted Jed, who is a student of history, can > point out that the trends always reverse, which is true. Someone asked Mark Twain, "Do you think it will ever stop raining?" He replied, "always has." Social trends almost always do reverse because they reach the point of absurdity or destructiveness. As my mother said around 1950, "if trends continue the world will be knee-deep in televisions in a few years." (She was a social science researcher and yes, she was kidding.) Trends always reverse, but it is not true that extreme social trends in all societies always return to a healthy norm. Sometimes, societies go extinct. Some ancient North American Indians may have destroyed themselves by the overuse of maize cultivation in fragile, arid land. Present-day US maize cultivation destroys the land and water table at a much faster rate than either can replenish. There is no doubt that sooner or later we will stop growing corn with present methods. The question is, will we stop because we develop better methods, or because the topsoil is lost and most of the land is converted to desert? No one can say what choice we will make. We have free will. We can *always* change our minds and come to our senses. Or not. > However, > they will not reverse in my lifetime, which is the fact that is > important to me and a fact that should be important to the present > generation. I would say they *may not* reverse. I agree they show no sign of reversing at present. But no one can say with certainty that they *will not* reverse. There is no law that says they must play out at a fixed rate to form a perfect sine wave. Sometimes, social trends reverse abruptly, without warning. A wonderful and unanticipated event can trigger changes in the right direction. Millions of people might suddenly become aware of cold fusion, and they might demand research. That can happen now, thanks to the Internet. Wonderful events do change the course of history. They are always the result of deliberate actions taken by one person, or by a small group of people. It isn't the society-wide "zeitgeist" that changes. One person somewhere decides to move the world. In 1948, Shockley, Bardeen and Brattain quietly invented the transistor. In 1958, Jack Kilby, working by himself when everyone else in the lab was on vacation, invented the integrated circuit. Semiconductors changed society as much as the steam engine or the automobile did. In December 1951, NAACP activist Rosa Parks refused to move to the back of a bus in Montgomery, AL. Her arrest led to a year-long mass boycott, which gave birth to the modern civil rights movement. There were other activists, and the movement would have condensed somewhere eventually, but it happened there, on that day, at that moment, because Parks *willed it*. She acted. Someone else would have eventually have discovered the transistor, but Shockley et al *did it*. Unfortunately, history often changes radically because someone does something dreadful, not wonderful. The 9/11 terrorist attacks profoundly affected society. Nuclear terrorism might change things beyond recognition. Experts agree efforts to prevent nuclear terrorism continue to lag. See today's New York Times: http://www.nytimes.com/2004/03/10/opinion/10KRIS.html > As I'm sure Horace would agree, if age has any benefit, > it allows a person to distill truth from bullshit, of which there is a > great quantity these days. There does not seem to be more today than there was in the 1950s and 60s. The Vietnam war was not marked by clear thinking or enlightened government. > Young people tend to believe the bullshit > because they have no reason to think their respected elders would > lie. Wars are not good for much, but they do teach young people to doubt their elders. > Only experience removes these optimistic myths. As a result the > old get short tempered and pessimistic because they recognize the > lies, the incompetence, and the eventual disaster. My parents lived through the Great Depression and WWII, some of my relatives were wounded in the attack on Hiroshima. Yet they did not get short temper or pessimistic. On the contrary, they concluded that if they could survive those dreadful events, and overcome those awesome difficulties, we can overcome today's problems too. One of the reasons Martin Fleischmann has never been afraid to speak out, and he has never been cowed by the opposition, is that he narrowly escaped from the Gestapo. (His father was killed.) The CF researcher and journal editor J. P. Vigier was (is?) a tough old bird who wore a leather jacket and feared no one, because he was a member of the resistance. He used to shoot German officers in the back of the head and escape on a bicycle. He showed me the technique, quite convincingly. Such people cannot be pushed around by the likes of Robert Park. They are not optimists -- Martin is very pessimistic -- but they have seen incomparably worse things, and they are not afraid. - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Mar 10 15:16:48 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2ANGhm1014462; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 15:16:44 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2ANGZOg014429; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 15:16:35 -0800 Resent-Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 15:16:35 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 14:22:18 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: [Not Off Topic] Big Martian Rock Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53497 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 11:07 AM 3/10/4, Mike Carrell wrote: >MC: Try budding for size. An image that was discussed a while back shows a >bluberry resting on a rock surface, with a well formed bulge on one side >demarked by a clean line, as if a smaller sphere were trying to push out >from inside the larger sphere. In the shadow below there is a strong >suggestion of filaments extending from the bud to the 'rock' below. I think such filaments in lichen are called rhizinae. Perithecia (sperical berry-like things that typically grow on the end of a stalk) and apothecia (irregular enlargements in stalks that look somehting like a tumor) are both primarily bags of meudllary matrix (fungal filaments) that enclose lots of one celled animals which can either bacteria or algae. Lichen is merely a symbiotic organism. It takes both a fungus and a symbiont to make a lichen. Like fungi, it reproduces multiple ways. > >One could dismiss the filaments, extept for the robust-appearing stalk >holding a blueberry above the ground surface in another recent image. > >Horace may be on target comparing these to lichens and fruiting bodies. >However, there are bacteria that reproduce by budding. Fruiting bodies are, >I believe, spore-dispersers. Yes the perithecia produce spores. But that is not the only means of lichen reproduction. >Terrestrial models are proper for showing what >is possible, but Martian life is by definition exotic. The solar energy >input is less than here, so the life processes may be much slower; that does >not mean they stop. Certainly all true. However, assuming the life form is water based, there can be no doubt that it is frozen much of the time. It is likely only able to reproduce in (comparatively) warm weather, above something like -25 C, which is not often except maybe in summer. Also it is clear from the photos that there are berries in a state of disintegration, that appear to be dead, or at least mostly composed of sublimating ice. The fuzzy powder left behind is likely unviable unless it contains microsopic hard shelled reproductive agents of some kind. Layer upon layer of such material, however, buried unsublimated, would leave a great legacy of water and nutrients for subsequent generations though. It also seems to me to be true that there is so much dissolved material in the water that fossilization must be (or at least have been) a very fast process on Mars. Some of the berries are likely fossils. In fact if you look at the CETI webpage there is photograpic evidence there of meteor carrried fossilized lichen-like structures bearing "berries." It strikes me as likely that fruiting bodies can self-bud during their formation. This is likely merely a genetic defect. In the high background radiation of Mars mutation rates must be very high. Given that the lifeforms spend most of their time frozen, their lifespans must be very long indeed. Mutation, however, carries on its merry way even when things are frozen. This then must provide a very high mutation rate. Fungal cells provide the overall lichen structures. If in the process of specialization to produce fruiting bodies a fungal cell is mutated, it might in fact revert back some steps in the production of the berry, and thus produce a bud on the berry itself. Again, the above is all very speculative, but it is also based on somewhat on well known facts. It wil lbe most interesting to hear what NASA has to say about the origin of the berries and the current presence of water. The water issue, it me seems to me to be no issue at all. It has already been detected at shallow levels by NASA via satellite a couple years ago. BTW, I think this subject matter is on topic. The reason for that is that vortex is provided to discuss scientific anomalies. Unless and until the obvious is announced, we are discussing a scientific anomaly. At one time I though vortex was only for energy related issues. However, the owner, Bill Beaty, has said from time to time that it is for anomaly discussion, e.g faster than light communication, relativity violation, alternative big bang theories, etc. It seems to me that this Mars life topic, at least while so timely, and so anomaly rich, is well on target. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Mar 10 15:17:25 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2ANHJFI022065; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 15:17:20 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2ANH2vT021988; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 15:17:02 -0800 Resent-Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 15:17:02 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 14:22:23 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: MARS Spirit .. CD Rock? Resent-Message-ID: <7j3fmD.A.bXF.tH6TAB ultra5.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53498 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 9:09 PM 3/10/4, wrote: >You are right on that. See sol 64 picture of this spot before mark is created: >http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/f/064/2F132046391EFF1500P1210R >0M1.HTML > >and the picture how the mark is being created: >http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/f/065/2F132128242EDN1500P1121L >0M1.HTML An excellent pair of observations Hamdi, and conclusive proof. > >It is remarkable that brightness of the soil increased so much by the >impression >and digging making it so darker. Yes. Probably because the material (lichen?) on top is very full of water (ice) which becomes visible upon crushing, while the subsurface material is not so full of water. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Mar 10 19:40:41 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2B3eaFI008006; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 19:40:36 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2B3eYe4007994; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 19:40:34 -0800 Resent-Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 19:40:34 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="============_-1133145739==_============" Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 18:45:57 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Bright object on far crater rim Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53499 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: --============_-1133145739==_============ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Some Spirit navcam images for sol 65 show the far side of the crater rim. At pixel 832,168 in: You can see what appears to be a highly reflective object in the above right camera view of the left side of the far rim. The bright object also shows up in the left view at: though is slightly differently shaped, despite being photgraphed at the same instant. This different shape, though the object is at a large distance, is a tip off that it might be a reflection. A clip of the object as taken from the right view is attached. Such a bright reflection or object seems to be unusual, based on the over 1000 photos provided so far. --============_-1133145739==_============ Content-Type: image/jpeg; name="BrightObject.JPG" ; x-mac-type="4A504547" ; x-mac-creator="4A565752" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="BrightObject.JPG" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 /9j/4AAQSkZJRgABAQEASABIAAD//gAXQ3JlYXRlZCB3aXRoIFRoZSBHSU1Q/9sAQwAB AQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEB AQEBAQEBAQEBAQEB/8AACwgAcABwAQEiAP/EAB4AAAICAgMBAQAAAAAAAAAAAAUGBAcD CAIJCgAB/8QAOhAAAQMCBAMGBAUDBAMBAAAAAQIDEQQhAAUSMQZBUQcTImFxgQiRofAU IzJCscHR8QkVU+EKQ1Ik/9oACAEBAAA/APV1xcg1LTKGiFlRSnweOCXI/bN7zfAzK+Hn 8lH414qKXwXAFAACRpjaeWPs2rEZmhNOgaS3YkAzYzz6z/nAympzl2p1Z1BQJi3NOnl9 zhH4lWrMVtJbQr8txskhKiPC4F3wz0SC5RsNCZQgA25gqP8AW+Mv4dTV1dZ+dvvnjEpp T8pSDaJte0n78sR1hVIFKKSYBOxmQPLl9+vPJuI2k1DqFI06SRKgpM+EdY32nrgrm2Yt 1TaO7gmwtJjxE3gz/G+MOUNklerwgzE+E/pjnb64wZ3SqX3ZSdUKT+mD+4bgXAEXxlYo 1oaQSFXSbRBNz1GG/hhYcfWqvKXEoJUA6QkeFIMAnTudvPDvm2ZUWc0yaOmbbZUwgoKk mNRBUqZUSD+qLeflipa6nXk7q3l6nkuKkADUBJCf2X3BPlOMCa0ZsO5QktFESSCkkbn9 YE772nHB1inyxJcfQh8uAxJ1EFUpH6Ve/wDjEbK6ttb7nhSElRgGRAAFhPQ+eDNY42UJ IAv0jrHM/wADnjNlrba1KkJ58wNh6+t+u5xgzalQpKUjT4iBYgbqI9tz7T0nC5mPCL6G 0PsPFJWAohCmybmCCBPIXB9cZcnyp5lxQqXdYTMd4U9LAbG1vPBLMnU06EhkgKsD3cK5 7+E9I6Y+yqoS6s9+kKE216hynnAkHrzwxVa2e7QEJSLDYxz9ZHy3m9zhT4kzVVO2z+Cl BUpIUWpVYrgzE7i1xiJT547l6G3luKcLoBUN1DUdNwBI5cp+ktdBmFNnYKHQ2nSmxcVp mATYrI3/AJviFmtMjLUhxgoUVxZohZEmJ8E8t53+uBdPR1OcFaVFxIQCRrGmdKSqBqAm YM/S+B66J2hcXJUIVvaL7eR9uuMoqFueGSSPU7Rv/O3viQ3XGlEnUJ9R5WP3F+uOZzH8 Re503uZPhvbEnLuIEqWtl5tSktykakqA2kRMA36H3xAzzM5Qk0ySgmJ0JJO/Pex+nTA7 KKhbzihUFRA27yw2G0hPPBLMX0MoQWClJME6SCJn1JFvL+MQf92U4AnWqQN4Pn6GT/Hz xNySjbqO/FU805CHCnvFoABDZIi4vPrhJzRxdBUPky+gKOlKJcCQIIjux12uY9NgVJnt TWuON0qnaYtTqISpM6RrI8QO4tbDBk3F5YqksV6VvgvIbBdC4lZCZkQIkg/5xsKteXsZ dSVTRp0GpaClBK0yApZSZBVI6mR69cB38pp8zQtbdRToISpZ/ObElIKogkmYEdQdtsV7 UuDL6lTKmy4O8CAoJJFyBMptAnrA+uJldQB2mbeQ8hJUjXpC0AiCqQUzI2i/PnzwJyRS Xal5p1aUBBUmXFBIUNINiqB7/wBcF8wZp0pT3LjKFGJKHEGTN5vz+/LNlVJTuqUHnGVg C2tbfQeY54w53RNNNJNM62gnfQtBJv6mZFtgOu+EttxaVuB1/UAFQFKTFk4hUdehb7qZ EJJG/kOtvfnjVFXxMZcyUhp9oaiAdDijYkAzKzsPuN7I4Q7cuHcxRVO1rtAsJYdWQ9UA foZKubovIItimOIPi+4L4dzWop0s5cpRqAz4HVqJ1kIvpd8/l1xIr/id4cqKSnraanpk lSUvSgun9KiZs4bwn536HA9r418rfcZy1RQgJcRTiVPJCdawJ8ShsVTc26c8XNS9uNPS 0dJmRzenU3VpS73YqmTpSpRSQQFhSRCSTPKSeWHag+Ijg/MWu5dqMpS8hspUtysbQor0 m/ifFwY5emFfM+3PJcuU48vNKBbKiShP4xkpCdt0uzyPO3rit85+Jvh95SGaCqokuhaE LUxUpWokrEzDqosdrW6zhvybtap8yaQ4rMGBqRq8VQ2Bsb3Vc/e+MuZ9sFJlKAv/AHKn 84qWtpjkvn7TgNT/ABE5U6pTT1dSKKZTK6lE7T/yeY9/ljDV9t2UOlIbrKMFwpBKapB/ UdP/ACm1/pGDlJ2h5ZTIRUqrqP8AOTqANUzN5H/Jbab+dunnVoO2GvUV95mTpsY1LAvp MR77f23E5n2+8QZQ1Udxm1agPNOtp0EkfmILcCEHrbkcar5hxxxlnuduVZzzMi2a1p6C UwUpWgmZb28N/SJFp2yyLtfqssyOnZra5brjdGtB7xYBKoXAtF79J9L4ozPu3HNEV77t EK9zu3u9Bp2H3T4ClX7EKkACfTDzwX8VOfZwmpyyqr8wpBTMvNN/iUOsJBDJUkgvISDd Vom/KcVBxt2/ceZNXKqqTibNSy5Uoc0MqDgCQtIKfA2oxAMza+A3EXxm8QO5ZS0jmf1r b6Wg0ta3NKysrVc6kgSZHIdPVr7Bu1rifiXOq2oq+J6lxnvFOoS9UMhICWUqjxJFgR7f Qbk5p8SauDqFrv8APm5S2QdVW0JupNyFDlt88U7mfxjK4heXSU+fpCkq0eCqQTJg81H/ AOrQOnKMRme1DiatP4in4hqtLpCxoeaIgnl4VdPXDblvaPxQVt68/rDoUlV3EciDaEX8 hiw6vtn4iNJTspzqsBbQASFDkonfTFweVug546x6vi6rK2Q0t4EuInQFGRrEzbaPl/DV mmemqoaKW1lWlGs6VyfzCTOwgjfyE8sHsnraEtAFhoLKCNRkEEgjmdxb3vgBxE1XuPUy Gq5TDbzzSEjWhKNLjqUQCobQo/e3bF8APwDVPxG1GbNiupnVtUVY7C6iimUZcXxZZ32s B7YH/GD/AKW3HHZE2MwyeqrAHXULWKBNM94TUd2qe4ZcIGlJk2gb462qrsOzbKmMxaz5 10Lp6apAVXpQx4ksLUI1pbEzEbXGOp3tqyPN6TPn2KHM3ChrMWk6adxpcJDrcjwhUCCd /c4urstz/N+E8vD66yoSpVK6Sra/dKTJhI6Xsfbnr3289s3E9e2unoc5r0FCtMNEE/rJ /wDhXIj5Hyxrl2Xce8aJ4gdcrM7zNxtdW2oB0ACIbn/1C3LfeeWO5bsm4+FXltC3UVqF udwEqLjqAZIO4J6mSI9gbY2cyioXWaVN1aYVH6XEG3M/Q78tueG+qpVhhs/jWydIkd80 DMwZvv7Y00ySqpm3FqfbSsCSErnkkEEQRzA+4wdd4oo1AtfhRCAUplLgjnMzB+s+uBQz 4tPtkLLaFOoAEwIKgIvEevrjB2rcZoybKskqWla1E061d0SsymqvOkk7ASTHM85x6Qf/ AB4e3LKc9474py7NK6jpkst1zKBXVLdNqJyJBCU9+4gGSYESdVrnHqn7X+zzgfjjhTMK 3Msvyaqap8or6ttx95GhQYYffCkKLyQqVIMaSbz548Iv+p72m8LcJZ9nmR8OU9Bl7rGY miUqhcJJLjqUH/2rTGlYBAtAx0AVDDzma1Ob5g6a1qrqBUIQspUEiEi2mDZSZgnEzijt Ay/L8pDLVOhpSKVxEhLiSTCwNz7GP4tjSd3iVnO86zBNQkLQH1FIc1AQEpNpI6T/AF6l H80yvJW0VDTFOlagFEoJJmefiN7Dl874fOAu2SrRXoYZefShDyEAJCyIlNhY28uRMG2O zDsw7THqihQtxbqj+GWqSF7htV9v6bjpg5UdrlR+Jeb7x6ELIA0uQBA6C+3n6b4CVdO/ QhK4cGxIjcTB2H9J5TgdW500BTtCnUlRWhBVoWJKlgTJtz9TGDGc8M1lVQ0dUw8psrSl w6CkGyyTMgmwHP0wuVnBuYcU0/4J6pUfwrZCe8UgAFILgjUBso+d/PF5fCLxXxj8OHGz 2e5Zn9fSMrzJmpeRSLRDjSEMIcbUG21KhSEFJAgkHrj0o1v+szlGedl1Jwe3Q1DOZ0nD dZllVWqYzJK33nWqod4paz3ZJS6BKUhNhbHlV+KFXEXbjxzn+ctZ1UJYqs4FaltTjSQE oU04Uw4mYOn1v89buJcmf4Vy6kaqVGpUEJbKoCzJcKQfyxE3H9ueKR4t4frOIKb/APO4 4wAgqiAmQJVHjB3Ejn88a55hwVXZc+8oOOJUpV1DT4iQADIET13sMD2OAc5zx0MprHgA oDduIJBgak+fzxf/AGf9gWZ0zzVU7VKIUpLl1NcoJ/b5W/jG8PB2QqySlbZcdSSWi3+p EypJTyjmflblhoHB7ry1PhwQs6v1I5iDf1GLhzxilfDCEJakrQkkKEwpcbkn35RiHnHA QfpKSoYKCRodUEKbWrwuSZCZI2HKfpjn+NRTMM0TzKj3aUsgqSsXJgG8AXV/Nzg1Q5Ep pCqpB0pdSpcAjbSRtuBbnscYMopjV17jCUKBU8GyvSf3QJkiABqkzYATyvbGc9l1dl+U t17ObIJqaZbhabqKVSkzrSUlCSVDa4IBg26Y1NzNNTklfWfiG3nQpxQ1FtRBlITMpABg 3nqLYr7OcrHFa0tABGhxMhVo0qCyIV7n5dcCuIez9eXUVMoJ1a0pB06VDxLKf2yPmeV8 UxxjwCWqdt4IBK06jEE/qjYCRMbCCcInDFCnLK9ZdpVLAdAu2s8k3Gm1up/vjaTI85pB TMtpo9BCNJOhyZM3JP2PSMNFO3UVR71tS0BHjiALJuZBExaP+74aMq4sbQVUy2SVseBS ihZmBM2EfLljjSZ+7WrA1L8JBAvMiFSPQgHrbF8dmtaa119quJU2lC0oD8pSAGpBBVpG +245Y/OOKWkptDzHcmFpWQ2pKv0rmICibgYQn+1GjyxpFM5SlZQnu/0PGZMTKYmZtb1G DXCXaHlq6h9xdElJe1aFKQ6NKlIASoEqiQqFXJHvizMqzmtq3HFvV6nqZcltguIUlCNM aABcCbxMmemEjtEqMvbpApOXpU4tJ1LDbhJUVG9iRIEQdsa6ZW/ozB9wtFCQ6VAFKgB4 R1vy5dfKMOOacQ0TtEltymS6WmlbpWYIlXI/K3t1o6pzhnOKt6lFIqEOaAC26QBAMXsB J9sE6Hghp0h7uEoKzqgiP552w1M8PppEj8seG/KYH972vgg3mrNAC2qnnWC3OhyxUNPy vP3GCeR5CmrfdqApADpK9JUkQNIEGen3ywTyXhCpy97vHS4tOoGDG1p29PvfFiVdf/t9 IgUbamXA2QtbYUCSZmSZ3Fjb5YrGv4qqkOOpqe/eSSQApCyBIi2lIi559MKFXWNZg4D3 WmFA3SobEHnz23I32nBqmdS2hCWU92qwJTa8wDJ5jrHIbYfuGqytonC48+44hZslWwFh FhO87npth1zrOaPMaRtpdOhRQggkpVJ8RPMifb64qHME0yFOFplKCom4B3IjmT1+h6jC y1TL1vFw6kuagkHYaklIiN43GIOX5SxQVblQ5ThYdc1DwkxMJm0Rfe//AFbWU0TWYtpQ 02GtKd4I2EydXPyv6WnGbMcmGXI1rhYUNrGOWw+Y88I1ZTtVRUlDISpChcA3Kb23v922 ErKlVFCtZIc0mY8BIuI5D72ONrKjIWGUzpbFjeU/336YW6jJWajUj8uBIEqTG3r5n6XG EzOOCWlpKwGiTJspJv0NyfQ+mKxreFHGnFaR+4AaQI+g+XOPPGak4dfkE6jpIJsOs9D6 +8TOGtFOadtILZGlO4Sb3Pl/GwxCeqJlEEGY2In58x9nqMXQKqeomOnTf/O0Y+TkC7HU N53E/cbYzVGWNoSgKSkxHO8g+vmJjyjDRw8UMrUIGx2IHL1/vHLridnoFS0kDkAOR/dv 9/1wo0WTqdf2N1jlykczy2PvPLFiJ4dYFO0otI1FInaZkjmdv7bRGD+f8UhDSIChIHJU xqj79MI7vFRZlZ1X5QqIn36Yit8ZJqFaCkm8XCov6+vte+DlKlquhWgXEyZmPfz6cuWD bNEy2Ujuk+IhNuRNuv8A1HK2CVdkDZpkOBKRqQTy3v1J8/u2K2rcnKHViRZXUbCP5/m8 dODVJ3QMwYE/xtG0Rbbzx+OrCbAAG3Laf8/OfeDVUi3EpUFQIB5dTy+/oMZKFlxlZIWf S21v5iMHQ0XQkKJOxi0XPX39flhhyygbkHQncX/te32ThqVTShItttaLHlbz5/XfH//Z --============_-1133145739==_============ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Regards, Horace Heffner --============_-1133145739==_============-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Mar 10 22:39:49 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2B6djm1007188; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 22:39:46 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2B6dhcJ007170; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 22:39:43 -0800 Resent-Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 22:39:43 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <40500C5B.3080504 eol.ca> Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 01:51:07 -0500 From: Dave User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; N; PPC; en-US; m18) Gecko/20010131 Netscape6/6.01 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: New experimental evidence of zero point energy References: <001801c406b3$51497de0$c828010a arghou.argcorp.argworldwide.com> <001201c406b9$d5a6c790$c450ccd1@MIKEBY3NR533HT> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53500 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: A To all, "Observations of Vacuum fluctuations Suggests the Existence of Zero Point Energy (ZPE)". The second experimental report available at www.heliognosis.com outlines the method to detect and amplify vacuum fluctuations using an AC electric field. Numerous oscilloscope screenshots are provided to show the quasi-cyclic vlf and ulf oscillations of the "empty space" around us. The coupling between the electric field and the ZPE were found to increase with increasing electric field strength. The unavoidable conclusion is that the "electric permitivity" of the vacuum is not constant and is modulated by a new form of energy. Dave Marett Heliognosis From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Mar 11 06:50:15 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2BEo6FI011659; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 06:50:08 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2BEnxIa011642; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 06:49:59 -0800 Resent-Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 06:49:59 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <40507C87.5030801 rtpatlanta.com> Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 09:49:43 -0500 From: "Terry Blanton" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Bright object on far crater rim References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53501 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Horace Heffner wrote: >Some Spirit navcam images for sol 65 show the far side of the crater rim. >At pixel 832,168 in: > >0M1.JPG> > >You can see what appears to be a highly reflective object in the above >right camera view of the left side of the far rim. The bright object also >shows up in the left view at: > This shows the relative locations of the lander, backshell and parachute, and the heat shield: http://www.msss.com/mars_images/moc/2004/01/23/ If Spirit is moving toward the large crater, we could be seeing the heat shield. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Mar 11 06:54:06 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2BEs3m1017668; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 06:54:03 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2BErxZY017650; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 06:53:59 -0800 Resent-Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 06:53:59 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f From: "explorecraft" To: Subject: RE: New experimental evidence of zero point energy Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 21:52:39 +0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <40500C5B.3080504 eol.ca> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - lester.switchfusion.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - eskimo.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - explorecraft.com Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53502 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Dave! Very nicely done - it only needs a summary. The gist appears to be: ZPE 'noise' energy can be measured on an elctrically charged plate, during charging cycles. I was planning on doing something like this using a _static_ 20kv using large plates. I recognize that using static charge might fail, but that's why we experiment.;^{ The trick will be to achieve a high impedance charge replenishment source to plates large enough to be a low-impedance coupling to ZPE, without dc current loss from ion wind. ... The reference to permittivity altered by electrical field is an interesting one, given I am still not quite swayed by Blaze Labs test setup >http://www.blazelabs.com/e-exp01.asp< which alleges a change seen in the presence of HV. This data is encouraging even though it centers on cyclic charge rather than static base charge. This could indicate a convenient method for 'free energy' ZPE collection. keep going... > -----Original Message----- > From: Dave [mailto:vortex eol.ca] > Sent: Thursday, 2004 March 11 13:51 > To: vortex-l eskimo.com > Subject: New experimental evidence of zero point energy > > > To all, > > "Observations of Vacuum fluctuations Suggests the Existence of Zero > Point Energy (ZPE)". The second experimental report available at > www.heliognosis.com outlines the method to detect and amplify vacuum > fluctuations using an AC electric field. Numerous oscilloscope > screenshots are provided to show the quasi-cyclic vlf and ulf > oscillations of the "empty space" around us. The coupling between the > electric field and the ZPE were found to increase with increasing > electric field strength. The unavoidable conclusion is that the > "electric permitivity" of the vacuum is not constant and is modulated by > a new form of energy. > > Dave Marett > Heliognosis > > > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Mar 11 07:14:58 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2BFEnFI017734; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 07:14:49 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2BFElro017719; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 07:14:47 -0800 Resent-Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 07:14:47 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f From: "explorecraft" To: "Vortex-L" Subject: Stars pixed by Spirit, nice foto Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 22:13:03 +0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0007_01C407B6.05D4F020" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - lester.switchfusion.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - eskimo.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - explorecraft.com Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53503 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C407B6.05D4F020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Looks like Spirit was working overtime, wee morning darkness imaging what I would hazard a guess might? be a planet?: http://origin.mars5.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/p/067/2P132276086EFF1700P2= 735L1M1.HTML I wonder if the stationary specks are background radiation, I would have thought the meteor? tracks would be longer, or are they predominately vertica; trajectory? weird ------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C407B6.05D4F020 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 
Looks = like Spirit=20 was working overtime, wee morning darkness
 imaging what I=20 would hazard a guess might? be a planet?:
 
http://origin.mars5.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/p/06= 7/2P132276086EFF1700P2735L1M1.HTML
 
I = wonder if the=20 stationary specks are background radiation,
I = would have thought=20 the meteor? tracks would be longer,
 or are they=20 predominately vertica; trajectory? weird
 
------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C407B6.05D4F020-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Mar 11 09:27:05 2004 Received: from ultra1.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra1.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra1.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2BHR0nL007792; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 09:27:00 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra1.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2BHQZvT007455; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 09:26:35 -0800 Resent-Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 09:26:35 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra1.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <000901c4078d$ff336d00$af7dfea9 rebradyboxx> From: "rebrady" To: Subject: Spirit picture of twigs Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 09:26:24 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/related; type="multipart/alternative"; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0005_01C4074A.EC03E8B0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53504 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C4074A.EC03E8B0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_001_0006_01C4074A.EC03E8B0" ------=_NextPart_001_0006_01C4074A.EC03E8B0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable GlacierWow: http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/n/067/2N132275207EFF1700P156= 2R0M1.JPG Bob Brady ------=_NextPart_001_0006_01C4074A.EC03E8B0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Glacier
Wow:
 
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/n/067/2N1= 32275207EFF1700P1562R0M1.JPG

Bob Brady

------=_NextPart_001_0006_01C4074A.EC03E8B0-- ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C4074A.EC03E8B0 Content-Type: image/jpeg; name="Glacier Bkgrd.jpg" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-ID: <000401c4078d$fa24b7b0$af7dfea9 rebradyboxx> /9j/4AAQSkZJRgABAgEASABIAAD/7QSqUGhvdG9zaG9wIDMuMAA4QklNA+kAAAAAAHgAAwAAAEgA SAAAAAAC2gIo/+H/4QL5AkUDRwUoA/wAAgAAAEgASAAAAAAC2AIoAAEAAABkAAAAAQADAwMAAAAB Jw8AAQABAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAYAgAGQGQAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA4 QklNA+0AAAAAABAASAAAAAEAAQBIAAAAAQABOEJJTQPzAAAAAAAIAAAAAAAAAAA4QklNBAoAAAAA AAEAADhCSU0nEAAAAAAACgABAAAAAAAAAAI4QklNA/UAAAAAAEgAL2ZmAAEAbGZmAAYAAAAAAAEA L2ZmAAEAoZmaAAYAAAAAAAEAMgAAAAEAWgAAAAYAAAAAAAEANQAAAAEALQAAAAYAAAAAAAE4QklN A/gAAAAAAHAAAP////////////////////////////8D6AAAAAD///////////////////////// ////A+gAAAAA/////////////////////////////wPoAAAAAP////////////////////////// //8D6AAAOEJJTQQAAAAAAAACAAA4QklNBAIAAAAAAAIAADhCSU0ECAAAAAAAEAAAAAEAAAJAAAAC QAAAAAA4QklNBAkAAAAAApkAAAABAAAAgAAAAAEAAAGAAAABgAAAAn0AGAAB/9j/4AAQSkZJRgAB AgEASABIAAD//gAnRmlsZSB3cml0dGVuIGJ5IEFkb2JlIFBob3Rvc2hvcKggNC4wAP/uAA5BZG9i ZQBkgAAAAAH/2wCEAAwICAgJCAwJCQwRCwoLERUPDAwPFRgTExUTExgRDAwMDAwMEQwMDAwMDAwM DAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwBDQsLDQ4NEA4OEBQODg4UFA4ODg4UEQwMDAwMEREMDAwMDAwR DAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDP/AABEIAAEAgAMBIgACEQEDEQH/3QAEAAj/xAE/ AAABBQEBAQEBAQAAAAAAAAADAAECBAUGBwgJCgsBAAEFAQEBAQEBAAAAAAAAAAEAAgMEBQYHCAkK CxAAAQQBAwIEAgUHBggFAwwzAQACEQMEIRIxBUFRYRMicYEyBhSRobFCIyQVUsFiMzRygtFDByWS U/Dh8WNzNRaisoMmRJNUZEXCo3Q2F9JV4mXys4TD03Xj80YnlKSFtJXE1OT0pbXF1eX1VmZ2hpam tsbW5vY3R1dnd4eXp7fH1+f3EQACAgECBAQDBAUGBwcGBTUBAAIRAyExEgRBUWFxIhMFMoGRFKGx QiPBUtHwMyRi4XKCkkNTFWNzNPElBhaisoMHJjXC0kSTVKMXZEVVNnRl4vKzhMPTdePzRpSkhbSV xNTk9KW1xdXl9VZmdoaWprbG1ub2JzdHV2d3h5ent8f/2gAMAwEAAhEDEQA/APTqPon4/wAAir5X SQGyn6oSXyukip+qEl8rpJKfqhJfK6SSn6oSXyukkp+qEl8rpJKfqhJfK6SSn6oSXyukkp//2QA4 QklNBAYAAAAAAAcABAAAAAEBAP/+ACdGaWxlIHdyaXR0ZW4gYnkgQWRvYmUgUGhvdG9zaG9wqCA0 LjAA/+4ADkFkb2JlAGQAAAAAAf/bAIQABgQEBwUHCwYGCw4KCAoOEQ4ODg4RFhMTExMTFhEMDAwM DAwRDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAEHCQkTDBMiExMiFA4ODhQUDg4ODhQRDAwM DAwREQwMDAwMDBEMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwM/8AAEQgAAwZAAwERAAIRAQMR Af/dAAQAyP/EAaIAAAAHAQEBAQEAAAAAAAAAAAQFAwIGAQAHCAkKCwEAAgIDAQEBAQEAAAAAAAAA AQACAwQFBgcICQoLEAACAQMDAgQCBgcDBAIGAnMBAgMRBAAFIRIxQVEGE2EicYEUMpGhBxWxQiPB UtHhMxZi8CRygvElQzRTkqKyY3PCNUQnk6OzNhdUZHTD0uIIJoMJChgZhJRFRqS0VtNVKBry4/PE 1OT0ZXWFlaW1xdXl9WZ2hpamtsbW5vY3R1dnd4eXp7fH1+f3OEhYaHiImKi4yNjo+Ck5SVlpeYmZ qbnJ2en5KjpKWmp6ipqqusra6voRAAICAQIDBQUEBQYECAMDbQEAAhEDBCESMUEFURNhIgZxgZEy obHwFMHR4SNCFVJicvEzJDRDghaSUyWiY7LCB3PSNeJEgxdUkwgJChgZJjZFGidkdFU38qOzwygp 0+PzhJSktMTU5PRldYWVpbXF1eX1RlZmdoaWprbG1ub2R1dnd4eXp7fH1+f3OEhYaHiImKi4yNjo +DlJWWl5iZmpucnZ6fkqOkpaanqKmqq6ytrq+v/aAAwDAQACEQMRAD8A9N/vv+Lv+SWFhv5/7F37 7/i7/kliu/n/ALFbJ63H/dv0+lTFd/P/AGKj++/y/wDkliu/n/sVa29Tl8fSn7fCn/JPfFIRH/AY GTv+AxV3/AYq7/gMVd/wGKu/4DFXf8Birv8AgMVd/wABirv+AxV3/AYq7/gMVd/wGKu/4DFXf8Bi rv8AgMVd/wABirv+AxV3/AYq7/gMVd/wGKu/4DFXf8Birv8AgMVd/wABirv+AxV3/AYq7/gMVd/w GKu/4DFXf8Birv8AgMVd/wABirv+AxV3/AYq7/gMVd/wGKu/4DFXf8Birv8AgMVd/wABirv+AxV3 /AYq7/gMVd/wGKu/4DFXf8Birv8AgMVd/wABirv+AxV3/AYq7/gMVd/wGKu/4DFXf8Birv8AgMVd /wABirv+AxV3/AYq7/gMVd/wGKu/4DFXf8Birv8AgMVd/wABirv+AxV3/AYq7/gMVd/wGKu/4DFX f8Birv8AgMVd/wABirv+AxV3/AYq7/gMVd/wGKu/4DFXf8Birv8AgMVd/wABirv+AxV3/AYq7/gM Vd/wGKu/4DFXf8Birv8AgMVd/wABirv+AxV3/AYq7/gMVd/wGKu/4DFXf8Birv8AgMVd/wABirv+ AxV3/AYq7/gMVd/wGKu/4DFXf8Birv8AgMVd/wABirv+AxV3/AYq7/gMVd/wGKu/4DFXf8Birv8A gMVd/wABirv+AxV3/AYq7/gMVd/wGKu/4DFXf8Birv8AgMVd/wABirv+AxV3/AYq7/gMVd/wGKu/ 4DFXf8Birv8AgMVd/wABirv+AxV3/AYq7/gMVd/wGKu/4DFXf8Birv8AgMVd/wABirv+AxV3/AYq 7/gMVd/wGKu/4DFXf8Birv8AgMVd/wABirv+AxV3/AYq7/gMVd/wGKu/4DFXf8Birv8AgMVd/wAB irv+AxV3/AYq7/gMVd/wGKu/4DFXf8Birv8AgMVd/wABirv+AxV3/AYq7/gMVd/wGKu/4DFXf8Bi rv8AgMVd/wABirv+AxV3/AYq7/gMVd/wGKu/4DFXf8Birv8AgMVd/wABirv+AxV3/AYq7/gMVd/w GKu/4DFXf8Birv8AgMVd/wABirv+AxV3/AYq7/gMVd/wGKu/4DFXf8Birv8AgMVd/wABirv+AxV3 /AYq/wD/2Q== ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C4074A.EC03E8B0-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Mar 11 11:44:57 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2BJipm1018901; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 11:44:52 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2BJifsH018810; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 11:44:41 -0800 Resent-Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 11:44:41 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f From: "explorecraft" To: Subject: RE: Stars pixed by Spirit, nice foto Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 02:42:42 +0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000C_01C407DB.B14778E0" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 In-Reply-To: X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - lester.switchfusion.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - eskimo.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - explorecraft.com Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53505 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_000C_01C407DB.B14778E0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I guess that had to be a martian moon, too big to be anything else. And perhaps the short diagonals are also radiation, in plane with the sensor. -----Original Message----- From: explorecraft [mailto:pariah explorecraft.com] Sent: Thursday, 2004 March 11 22:13 To: Vortex-L Subject: Stars pixed by Spirit, nice foto Looks like Spirit was working overtime, wee morning darkness imaging what I would hazard a guess might? be a planet?: = http://origin.mars5.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/p/067/2P132276086EFF1700P2= 735L1M1.HTML I wonder if the stationary specks are background radiation, I would have thought the meteor? tracks would be longer, or are they predominately vertica; trajectory? weird ------=_NextPart_000_000C_01C407DB.B14778E0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I=20 guess that had to be a martian moon,
 too big to be anything else.
And=20 perhaps the short diagonals are also radiation,
 in plane with the sensor.
-----Original Message-----
From: explorecraft=20 [mailto:pariah explorecraft.com]
Sent: Thursday, 2004 March = 11=20 22:13
To: Vortex-L
Subject: Stars pixed by Spirit, = nice=20 foto

 
Looks like Spirit=20 was working overtime, wee morning darkness
 imaging what=20 I would hazard a guess might? be a planet?:
 
http://origin.mars5.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/p/06= 7/2P132276086EFF1700P2735L1M1.HTML
 
I = wonder if the=20 stationary specks are background radiation,
I = would have=20 thought the meteor? tracks would be longer,
 or are they=20 predominately vertica; trajectory? weird
 
------=_NextPart_000_000C_01C407DB.B14778E0-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Mar 11 12:55:07 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2BKt2m1001900; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 12:55:03 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2BKt1lr001886; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 12:55:01 -0800 Resent-Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 12:55:01 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 12:01:02 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: Bright object on far crater rim Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53506 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 9:49 AM 3/11/4, Terry Blanton wrote: >Horace Heffner wrote: > >>Some Spirit navcam images for sol 65 show the far side of the crater rim. >>At pixel 832,168 in: >> >>>0M1.JPG> >> >>You can see what appears to be a highly reflective object in the above >>right camera view of the left side of the far rim. The bright object also >>shows up in the left view at: >> > >This shows the relative locations of the lander, backshell and >parachute, and the heat shield: > >http://www.msss.com/mars_images/moc/2004/01/23/ > > >If Spirit is moving toward the large crater, Yes, indeed, it is on the southern rim. >we could be seeing the heat shield. Excellent observation! You can even see the black marks around the shiney spot in the Spirit navcam images above. The rest of the black streak in the MGS photo must be hidden over the rim. Wow, that would make an excellent place to put into Spirit's itinerary. The heat shield must have done some signifant surface disruption, so there would be freshly exposed mineral surfaces not otherwise obtainable. Some things stirke a bit strange about the MGS images. First is the fact that the heat shield impact streak goes off at almost right angles to its direction of travel. It must have hit a very massive rock. Second, there is no indication of any white material in the MGS image of the heat shield impact streak. The white must therefore be a reflection of some kind, unless maybe the heat shield is standing up on end. Another is the fact that the heat shield itself should be at the far end of the streak. The end of the streak visible from the far side of the crater is the initial impact point, the near end of the streak. I suppose the streak could be merely composed of disrupted dust, and the heat shield itself could be located at the initial impact point. Dark dust certainly jives with the results of grinding into the rocks, even light ones. Some evidence that the bright light is a reflection or light source is the fact that there is a diffuse cone of light pattern on the ground in front of it, with a reflective highlight on the midline to the object. There is the possibility that a (now) wet surface has been exposed. It will be very interesting to see what the new panoramic photos will show. Also of minor note is that it looks like something foreign is down in the crater toward the bottom right. It looks like a rock or something dark surrounded by a white halo of dust or something. The east crater wall appears to have been perforated by a meteor or something. It looks as if there is a narrow land bridge across the impact point. Could be an illusion, but there is in fact an odd structure over on the east corner of the crater rim. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Mar 11 13:26:02 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2BLPrFI026589; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 13:25:54 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2BLPdoE026558; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 13:25:39 -0800 Resent-Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 13:25:39 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 12:31:03 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: Ed's opinion Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53507 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 10:16 AM 3/10/4, Edmund Storms wrote: >As I'm sure Horace would agree, if age has any benefit, >it allows a person to distill truth from bullshit, of which there is a >great quantity these days. How true. My only reservation is the still limitied capacity I seem to have to recognize and curb my own. 8^) >Young people tend to believe the bullshit >because they have no reason to think their respected elders would >lie. Only experience removes these optimistic myths. As a result the >old get short tempered and pessimistic because they recognize the >lies, the incompetence, and the eventual disaster. Once things get >bad enough, changes are made, but this is only after many optimistic >people are hurt. I, for one, am too old to afford optimism, although >I prefer it to pessimism. It is so unfortunate that when nations are involved the remedial change or its cause so often has to take the form of war. In the US the BS of most concern is that which flows unheard, which can not be exposed, like the private conversations between lobbyists and those in power for example. However, throughout history some lies have been so great and so decieving, so well recieved that they drown out the truth and those who dare utter it. Such lies can be prolific and ubiquitous, like the propaganda of Hitler's Germany, yet no one in the society dare question them. Given some of the drum beating in the media these days I am concerned we could be moving toward BS of that magnitude. It is also unfortunate but true that lies and deception played a major role winning the consequential WWII, that lies are a signifcant weapon in conflict. It would be a better world if we could eliminate BS and bullets, but that does not seem like something that will happen any time soon. Meanwhile I guess we just have to cope as well as we can. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Mar 11 15:09:34 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2BN9Vm1000793; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 15:09:31 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2BN9Ovb000757; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 15:09:24 -0800 Resent-Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 15:09:24 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <001a01c407bd$dc690520$8837fea9 cpq> From: "Jones Beene" To: References: <6.0.3.0.2.20040309153352.01cf2878 pop.mindspring.com> Subject: Re: A relatively easy CF experiment from 1991 - again Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 15:09:09 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ultra6.eskimo.com id i2BN9Km1000608 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53508 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Robin van Spaandonk writes, > EUV or low energy x-rays up to about 1 keV is exactly what one would expect from hydrino formation.... The occasional high energy particle from the Deuterium reactions is a consequence of fusion following on from deuterino formation." The possibility of hydrino or deuterino formation seems to have been nullified by one of the testing procedures. You must have missed it on page 3. Here is the relevant quote: "With Polaroid film: Loaded Pd samples were also photographed using Polaroid films (Viva, 3000 ASA) and films sensitive up to ultraviolet wavelength. In both the cases no fogging of the films was observed after an exposure time of 60 h This test implies that the emission from the planchet may not be visible or ultraviolet radiation." Without any UV to indicate the necessary first few stages of hydrogen shrinkage, I can't see a way that hydrinos are involved. They can't just skip those early stages. The experimenter used sound and nearly foolproof techniques. Since all of the D2 or H2 loaded palladium samples fogged the X-ray films, but not the film sensitive to UV and since the spectrum was way below any kind of fusion event, this cannot be hydrino or cold fusion either. But the study was well done, and it contradicts many preconceived notions. a tentative conclusion: "The main part of the radiation perhaps consists of electrons in the energy range of few tens to few hundreds of eV with intensity of 105 to 107 particles/s." Hmmm... I wonder if the radiation could be - not electrons at all but another, lighter lepton...say, an electron antineutrino with varying degrees of mass/energy due velocity ? Jones Other relevant tidbits: "One Pd sample was also loaded with helium (He4) using plasma focus. Subsequently the sample was autoradiographed...for 72 h... No fogging on the film was observed. This implies that phenomena observed are specific to D2/H2 loading only. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Mar 11 16:33:15 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2C0XBm1018230; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 16:33:11 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2C0X94Y018208; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 16:33:09 -0800 Resent-Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 16:33:09 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 15:38:17 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: Bright object on far crater rim Resent-Message-ID: <4UtkLC.A.ccE.FVQUAB ultra6.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53509 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Regarding the navcam images for sol 65 show the far side of the crater rim at pixel 832,168 in: there is a new Bonneville Crater panoramic collage press release at: that clearly shows the white spot at the heat shield impact point again. It must be a very white object. It did not show op in the MGS photo, so the white surface must be nearly vertical. The photo shows all of the far wall of Bonneville and well down into the crater. Some of the other features that appeared in the MGS photos must be illusions. There is no apparent rock at the bottom right (SE) part of the crater, nor does there appear to be a meteor impact point on the east wall of the crater. There does appear to be a small crater where it appeared there was an object surrounded by white in the crater in the MGS photo though. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Mar 11 17:04:50 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2C14km1025674; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 17:04:46 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2C14jb5025660; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 17:04:45 -0800 Resent-Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 17:04:45 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <40510F30.3010002 eol.ca> Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 20:15:28 -0500 From: Dave User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; N; PPC; en-US; m18) Gecko/20010131 Netscape6/6.01 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: New experimental evidence of zero point energy References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53510 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: In regard to the new method to detect and amplify vacuum > fluctuations using an AC electric field... pariah explorecraft wrote: "I was planning on doing something like this using a _static_ 20kv using large plates. I recognize that using static charge might fail, but that's why we experiment.;^{ The trick will be to achieve a high impedance charge replenishment source to plates large enough to be a low-impedance coupling to ZPE, without dc current loss from ion wind." I have also tested DC charged plates. The fluctuations begin to become noticeable above the circuit noise at around 2000V and increase considerably as you approach 5000V. Of coarse, the fluctuations in this case occur in the voltage only. Higher voltages suffer from the formation of corona and would have to be performed in a high vacuum. The Advantage of the AC is that the quasi-static field is renewed and sampled thousands of times a second and allows for the use of safe voltage and current levels. The Experimental Life Energy Meter which employs this effect uses only 250V AC at a very small current. Touching the plate causes no significant sensation. I have also noticed that the human body contributes a strong fluctuation to the plate current, even at a distance and in the absence of motion. This is perhaps further proof that a new form of energy is at work here...Of coarse much research needs to be done in this direction. Over 4000 papers are available at the Scirus website on ZPF and I encourage everyone to pursue this emerging technology. For those who would like to get a head start, equipment is available to observe these effects at www.heliognosis.com Dave Marett From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Mar 11 20:30:10 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2C4U1FI019384; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 20:30:01 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2C4TxhT019357; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 20:29:59 -0800 Resent-Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 20:29:59 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 19:35:36 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Structures on hills norteast of Bonneville Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53511 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: It can not be confirmed without additional photos, but it appears that there are structures or there is some kind of structure visible at the horizon line at 2313,63 in the Spirit panoramic view of Bonneville: The most prominent is on top of the 3rd major hill in from the left (west). It's the 4th hill if you count the very tiny hill at the beginning of the chain. The structure is not visible in or: but these are too blurry at the long distance to tell anything one way or another. It is very unsual that NASA has not posted or is at least so late at posting on the JPL website the source photos for the Spirit panaramic collage of Bonneville. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Mar 11 23:21:46 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2C7Lfm1025372; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 23:21:41 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2C7LeTV025354; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 23:21:40 -0800 Resent-Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 23:21:40 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="============_-1133046031==_============" Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 22:27:45 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: No troublesome tortoise, but will a fish do? Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53513 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: --============_-1133046031==_============ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" I've had no luck locating a troublesome tortoise for Terry Blanton, but, just for fun, maybe an archaic fish will do? See pixel location 374,852 in: (a clip is attached.) --============_-1133046031==_============ Content-Type: image/jpeg; name="fish.JPG" ; x-mac-type="4A504547" ; x-mac-creator="4A565752" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="fish.JPG" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 /9j/4AAQSkZJRgABAQEASABIAAD//gAXQ3JlYXRlZCB3aXRoIFRoZSBHSU1Q/9sAQwAB AQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEB AQEBAQEBAQEBAQEB/8AACwgAOQBBAQEiAP/EABwAAAEFAQEBAAAAAAAAAAAAAAcEBQYI CQMKAv/EAE8QAAEEAAIGBAQODgsAAAAAAAMBAgQFBhEABxITITEIFCJBFTIzUQkWIyQ0 NUJSVGFiZIHTNkNEU1VjcXWRkrHB0vAXJUVWdIKToaLC0f/aAAgBAQAAPwD0RAwJW1L3 zetmcKLH3pi7WyMbl7juYxhXJx5DINf99Myumjrts9b2OMEYCiYKsLivwxezSGlzHNIO giRvJuK8wnimK5MtpRDGi5dlG6Wb1bY1OKlgUDZsKHDo4O9QQHEG2WHl6lm9yOP8a7SK ufZ4aFoppExgoSoRBz4+8roADNZ2s+chMlV35GKJc+/uWVmPPrZToZZLnBbHUpkPJIBS u4ZImW21W8ePZVeaZ5aJY1FLlDh2lqBlgSWu7MxSsHKh8vXzY5BufJhrzyEjXZ5eqd2i tcGTIbRWi1ha/D4RZlnWT2Fqgn57LJMhFyZ8T2OXP3XFNOcTCsokab1QY41Y4u8WGs4d kOHJ5dQQ8QYmITz8F0Qekmy98f8AS3+HT6xVrVfcVKurIggdYekUkUIiIKUP30hrjPe5 +fex42+dvJUBMytW3FAurSiZAkNFIA+Z1WB2UkeUfuElLJeVqeK4xStRObXacYNcyKcM UD66Tsyesw0q4nWpNmnwaG5rkZDjd+xJGcnHymkurhvrb+JHcs00xYfannkDWHVF4p1B Y6CaeVMb3KEzG803eibWFrducOSK+HhUFbPxE1FgypIFFfYJw5J8+M8RzSUciALkmTKw bvlc86ua8OnHgXUXHtRk1n1msXXRBq0c5mHFAuB9XxuK+D3bKvPcQs+G7FaKdPhGmOHS T9F+xgzDVxTY2xbeYYlypucRcLzRDIvLgkWUs6Bs96okP6U56GD0MP0UnWDrSxjAwthi ixNaat4GHZhsV3mIgEOEdmlh1SA9skiiZLuSj7RCCZuHk4sjMb2dPQB/Ty34A39df49A ok+bhaJUzcRnBXzJvr+qryqqrOgG9iTuo7ayUjvzTaTeoq5pk9OGjZKsr7EMqZJpxQY7 IRspRTRWvGIPHJwCOaKNLd35iFlknFNC9h2vjR6lZ8veMlPbvJ1nDUQ62GL3zpYx5nXz rDYBP31A6YvSxwV0esNyLnFsqvwrGpq70xSr2XL32I2TPguE6ABhFvV45eGXoWIq/wBn omnnn6R/onMjXDBQWGQiPh20YrYtNAxQtPNxi/uNiTFNoEFgY3PtvogNVM8m5rlpkrrJ tOk7rct6+iwNhAdBUrL30WNV3JOrhHmnZJaW8pki8Hs7TuKD7WTcuO0lzNS/oTvSF16Y hocWdIa1FMqkLvT19e8qrDcnJsk2y8Uxq5JwjsCqdyr3+jvo+6lsHah62iwXS4cBFcGJ DG6DUQGRBguYcrrY5ExytUhmlKuR0I9dpiojFY7taXy9LhPwBI/1m/8AmgD1e4H1j4i1 iY11sa48S4al2Bburr8LUFDbltMP6usGVXkKu3WxDWNl2h14SSw5MSOT7XFFw0O93ExZ jSTDYe2j2WEIkDbq0wqAFbDQf9V9sJEYchHevSqiyCmTsj4cHbdKemp098MdH3DFfqW1 SU1trS6UN+KZTYJwth128DSyI/iWOJq1EUEiA7ht7uREIqeKRNMDsVdCrpk9JvE1pjfp Ua66WniKXwrT4YpVmYhLRTvfRCzmRkBH4ZrATOB82VNClqV9DnwvEtZGIsU66fTvbjsP B4FlYNwj4QsHp7tk20n2I2M+UBgvy6a56jehZqK1fUc/F1vRwKeUWPsycRY4G6yQgUTx wOmKSsiP5cYdVHauXBuWlrqPHdFeRotVhUy1eHg+01jYV4a6BI7/AFiAQRyoqfnA8xOW iW4jyEMwsSA+dbBLubCXHcXafw8qjkIqIblm5M28+zy0sLlZ/hSL+kv1+kdB0e8MdJHB xcPYpdfT8N3bt4R2Gp1kBQH+EXm+JWyzFTzjLHZ8jRy6RtvhrUfqiJgjVtZLMxDFB4KI QKo7qgE6mu9hqNonMP6yFm4qmH2iZjXNqMxrl4HwbheIe/pfCF1rGxLMkVMrF1yIMi6q myfKJSywR4lpFGmfZdIlS3J7pztDhql6J2L9YTI1vjuzxQKArd4Uc2wlniSKviu0dpVI Z0pcvGYYY+fqXmvpg/o9YQwfHBV11KpxBr9/WPIVZBEH+GDFe1Vc75m3ZkcfH4aTKTqf w/FsVLjaWqGHF6pDBMI+XRSBr9sl1z0cAhFzXiLcsTPxOG1o0ytUUBUtLzDt2OuqWCEt jSrTCtTDPOVfBzYIxWAWx2pn65RGPVfcKPNdGVlFiHC1ZLJI6uyREF1uYZ4iKspqc5sZ VImUf5g7eS14Lv8AR89N4P7uk/Vf9ZoeIWsvEWE8MXDSRRBtLGTlGIkbbQ1ZxytDMI5z MsvuMbRn4eNpnb0rWXsetwyarlDscU41t9mDDaF5Bshc95IGI7DoT5W+RnyOOjnqu6PE KOaPi3WFsHuo8OG4sFqvjw97I8c499vWIVPcuUjkTJc2u0uVQkqmRB08G2BAXZ3Y4clD Hag/vZNyQS7HnRuyqZcV0KlahFrmEZXnIRQ7YTCezZHPz9kO2mPdvF5bvaSN+I0UYjrI LoJYNs1EmxIkKeTraNeOdGkeOlV2Ue0jfcb150ThmjtGmpwlNhNgzFSpsHSTFMdkPwXG bKV/k2nTrC9VZFRV6sh81Hze5+kKx+GXfuPSVteOVDPY9YLKC7cyoUrukuKRzw7fDybg OjfiNI76U7P38j9AfqtJVjeaw8ERYhBTRrP3YTNRBjj2eXAUjaVVWYq/dbVZWfMvOCF1 b0dw+NjTEceZAsKoG4rYcmY01bET74CbulRhfj2VRcuDdHa0n2kusBBthkm0aiAKJMiP HH662P4iuGRpDucqePk5qLw2UTQvaq8OwQCsp0qvlSHFCqikTBiQ4ze8G5ytYjfiVjnZ 8nck0OVXEGEc6dHGWPAMbfJEO9qtC7nsgajWK1nxOV6/K8zPb2dFIGUWIJUZ1vElgjQc nZBDCjr2GMRVc9UcidraIqc9lGovAbMs45Emkr6iO3wl7PGYEbdy/PttGMbhd3sdweXD z6fcEsSxFIhhdIe6WXfHsozcwkd5lVVYuXLLJc0Xv5ZIt5c/DoP/AD+v0HOIfseL+af+ q6c7n2nkfR+3Rnu/Gwr/AD3aT6t9pU/xTv36WIP7GkfT+xdK14v9uv8AMmjoLyKfR+1N ENl9jCfz3rp20//Z --============_-1133046031==_============ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Regards, Horace Heffner --============_-1133046031==_============-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Mar 11 23:21:54 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2C7Lgm1025380; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 23:21:43 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2C7LbYc025326; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 23:21:37 -0800 Resent-Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 23:21:37 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 22:27:42 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: Structures on hills norteast of Bonneville Resent-Message-ID: <4GlC_B.A.mLG.BUWUAB ultra6.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53512 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: I messed up the URL references in the prior post. Slightly corrected URLS follow. It can not be confirmed without additional photos, but it appears that there are structures or there is some kind of structure visible at the horizon line at 2313,63 in the Spirit panoramic view of Bonneville: The most prominent is on top of the 3rd major hill in from the left (west). It's the 4th hill if you count the very tiny hill at the beginning of the chain. The structure is not visible in and its right hand companion photo, but these are too blurry at the long distance to tell anything one way or another. It is STILL very unsual that NASA has not posted or is at least so late at posting on the JPL website the source photos for the Spirit panoramic collage of Bonneville. NASA has just lately posted som photos from righ on the rim, but not the photos from which the above panorama was composed. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Mar 12 05:01:26 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2CD1JFI026851; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 05:01:19 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2CD1HQN026839; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 05:01:17 -0800 Resent-Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 05:01:17 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <003101c40829$a91abe40$aa09bf3f computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: Subject: Re: Hydrogen From Biomass Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 06:00:45 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-ELNK-Trace: 0b1c9d71006e06a171639b933de7ae6f7e972de0d01da940bfd30a08773062f111fc01ca17925b90350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53514 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: This is the work that I started 30 years ago to reform biomass into hydrogen and other fuels using hot water and a catalyst. J. A. Dumesic went through several hundred trial catalysts before he got it right. :-) Highlight the number copy and paste it in the box here. http://patft.uspto.gov/netahtml/srchnum.htm The patent is 31 pages long. This should also work on starch and cellulose, especially after peroxide pretreatment. (Mike Gould's Process). Since the slightly exothermic reaction between water and glucose with this reaction; C6H12-O6 + 6 H2O ---> 6 CO2 + 12 H2 produces copious amounts of hydrogen that can be reacted with the CO2 to form a readily storeable Methanol-Water Antifreeze mix for ICEs; 3 H2 + CO2 ---> CH3OH + H2O or an onboard reaction for fuel cell powered vehicles is easily accomplished on demand by metering the mix from the fuel tank into a reformer and reversing the reaction: CH3OH + H2O ---> CO2 + 3 H2 Regards Frederick United States Patent 6,699,457 Cortright , et al. March 2, 2004 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Low-temperature hydrogen production from oxygenated hydrocarbons Abstract Disclosed is a method of producing hydrogen from oxygenated hydrocarbon reactants, such as glycerol, glucose, or sorbitol. The method can take place in the vapor phase or in the condensed liquid phase. The method includes the steps of reacting water and a water-soluble oxygenated hydrocarbon having at least two carbon atoms, in the presence of a metal-containing catalyst. The catalyst contains a metal selected from the group consisting of Group VIII transitional metals, alloys thereof, and mixtures thereof. The disclosed method can be run at lower temperatures than those used in the conventional steam reforming of alkanes. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Inventors: Cortright; Randy D. (Madison, WI); Dumesic; James A. (Verona, WI) Assignee: Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation (Madison, WI) Appl. No.: 998552 Filed: November 29, 2001 Current U.S. Class: 423/648.1 Intern'l Class: C01B 003/02 Field of Search: 423/648.1,650,651,652,653,654 BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Fuel cells have emerged as one of the most promising new technologies for meeting future global energy needs. In particular, fuel cells that consume hydrogen are proving to be environmentally clean, quiet, and highly efficient devices for power generation. However, while hydrogen fuel cells have a low impact on the environment, the current methods for producing hydrogen require high-temperature steam reforming of non-renewable hydrocarbon fuels. Further still, these high-temperature methods produce significant amounts of polluting emissions and greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide (CO.sub.2). A key challenge for promoting and sustaining the vitality and growth of the fuel cell industry (as well as the entire industrial sector of society) is to develop efficient and environmentally benign technologies for generating fuel, such as hydrogen, from renewable resources. Notably, if hydrogen fuel for consumption in fuel cells can be generated efficiently from renewable sources, then non-renewable resources such as petroleum feedstocks can be used for other, more beneficial, and less environmentally deleterious purposes. Moreover, the generation of energy from renewable resources such as biomass, reduces the net rate of production of carbon dioxide, an important greenhouse gas that contributes to global warming. This is because the biomass itself, i.e., plant material, consumes carbon dioxide during its life cycle. At present, the vast majority of hydrogen production is accomplished via steam reforming of a hydrocarbon (usually methane) over a suitable catalyst. Conventional steam reforming takes place at considerably elevated temperatures, generally from about 400.degree. C. to 700.degree. C. or even higher (673 to 937 K and higher). From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Mar 12 06:05:50 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2CE5jm1018254; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 06:05:46 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2CE5e6M018225; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 06:05:40 -0800 Resent-Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 06:05:40 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <006801c4083b$2fceef40$6401a8c0 Craig> From: "SnowDog" To: Subject: Spirit Heat Shield Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 08:05:46 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53515 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: This is probably a good color picture of Mars, balanced for white light. http://www.golddirectory.com/mars/mars.htm The heat shield in the distance is so shiny that it prevents the PanCam from adjusting any of the filtered images. It's also the only thing that NASA has imaged in visible color, in days. Craig Haynie (Houston) From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Mar 12 06:07:41 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2CE7am1018775; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 06:07:37 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2CE7agr018761; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 06:07:36 -0800 Resent-Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 06:07:36 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <4051C449.8050707 rtpatlanta.com> Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 09:08:09 -0500 From: "Terry Blanton" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: No troublesome tortoise, but will a fish do? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <1rK3RC.A.FlE.oQcUAB ultra6.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53516 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Horace Heffner wrote: >I've had no luck locating a troublesome tortoise for Terry Blanton, but, >just for fun, maybe an archaic fish will do? > Vesica Picis on Mars! Wait 'till Gibson hears about this. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Mar 12 07:03:08 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2CF35m1029377; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 07:03:05 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2CF34sp029363; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 07:03:04 -0800 Resent-Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 07:03:04 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-Id: <6.0.3.0.2.20040312095851.01cc91d0 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell mindspring.com@pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.3.0 Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 10:03:20 -0500 To: vortex-L eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: More voting machine news Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53517 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Noted computer columnist Robert Cringely quoted me about voting machines in this week's column: http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/pulpit20040311.html I wish I could get him to write about CF. His suggestion that the voter name be included on the paper ballot would violate election laws. Ballots have to be secret. Even if the voter's selections (or name) were encoded in bar-code, an election official with access to the bar code reading equipment could read it and find who voted for whom. It is better to print the choices in plaintext, have the voter confirm the paper record is correct, and then randomly mix up the paper receipts inside a ballot box. There is a report that California may decertify the machines: http://www.wired.com/news/evote/0,2645,62627,00.html?tw=wn_tophead_6 This goes to show that reform is possible, and people sometimes react and fix problems. - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Mar 12 07:11:55 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2CFBmFI015491; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 07:11:48 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2CFBkjk015472; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 07:11:46 -0800 Resent-Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 07:11:46 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <007201c4083b$e41831a0$aa09bf3f computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: Subject: Re: Thermochemical-Electrochemical Data Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 08:11:11 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0005_01C40809.94EFFC20" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-ELNK-Trace: 0b1c9d71006e06a171639b933de7ae6f7e972de0d01da9407d63d28946914a3f203420fc91dca4a6350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53518 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C40809.94EFFC20 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit These tables of data run 12 pages. Good reference info well worth printing out. http://www.pg.gda.pl/chem/Dydaktyka/Fizyczna/chf_epm_cr_01.pdf Regards Frederick ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C40809.94EFFC20 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="chf_epm_cr_01.url" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="chf_epm_cr_01.url" [DEFAULT] BASEURL=http://www.pg.gda.pl/chem/Dydaktyka/Fizyczna/chf_epm_cr_01.pdf [InternetShortcut] URL=http://www.pg.gda.pl/chem/Dydaktyka/Fizyczna/chf_epm_cr_01.pdf Modified=E01003123B08C4010D ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C40809.94EFFC20-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Mar 12 07:13:16 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2CFD8FI016771; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 07:13:08 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2CFD704016757; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 07:13:07 -0800 Resent-Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 07:13:07 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <007901c40844$6b206520$8837fea9 cpq> From: "Jones Beene" To: References: <40510F30.3010002@eol.ca> Subject: Re: New experimental evidence of zero point energy Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 07:12:19 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ultra5.eskimo.com id i2CFD4FI016737 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53519 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Dave writes, > "I have also tested DC charged plates. The fluctuations begin to become noticeable above the circuit noise at around 2000V and increase considerably as you approach 5000V. " What you may be noticing could be related to a particular kind of charge imbalance and the effect of free electrons. But be aware of the possibility of confusion about how one defines the "free" in this case. This distinction, in itself could also relate back to ZPE, but via a specific medium that you can concentrate on to maximize the effect, i.e. the natural free electron and the Forster radius. In older experiments, there has been significance related to the 2000 v threshold vis-a-vis the de Broglie radius of the free electron. For instance, 2000 v is a threshold where Graneau and others often find an energy anomaly. If you want the details, some of this info can be found in older posts in the vortex archive by Horace Heffner and myself. I believe that it is no accident that the 2-10 nm Forster radius includes the de Broglie wavelength of thermalized aqueous electrons of the type one might expect to find as free electrons in the atmosphere, rain water BUT not necessarily in metal with a slight charge imbalance. If you want to test this distinction, using a metal plate, here is a specific suggestion: Instead of charging the plate with a HV induction source, try charging it using the air flow off a room air ionizer with the filter removed or a belt-driven van de Graff connected to an outside ground. There seems to be several varieties of so-called "free" electrons and there seems to be something special about those that are "free in nature." Needless to say, you will not find confirmation of this meshugga-doublespeak in any physics textbook. But for what it's worth, consider that Dr. Peter Graneau specifically uses "rain water" to get his energy anomaly. Jones From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Mar 12 07:20:03 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2CFJwm1000931; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 07:19:59 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2CFJvv5000912; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 07:19:57 -0800 Resent-Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 07:19:57 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <008b01c40845$76019f80$8837fea9 cpq> From: "Jones Beene" To: References: <40510F30.3010002@eol.ca> <007901c40844$6b206520$8837fea9@cpq> Subject: Re: New experimental evidence of zero point energy Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 07:19:49 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ultra6.eskimo.com id i2CFJrm1000875 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53520 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Addendum to previous Post. After seeing the message from Fred, I should add that Fred is the vortex expert on the free electron and the anomalies that might be caused by such. I understand that he has even purchased a van de Graff (in order to self-power his "swamper" through those New Mexico summers). Jones From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Mar 12 08:42:29 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2CGgKGb018908; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 08:42:21 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2CGgDKo018830; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 08:42:13 -0800 Resent-Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 08:42:13 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 07:47:35 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: No troublesome tortoise, but will a fish do? Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53521 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 9:08 AM 3/12/4, Terry Blanton wrote: >Horace Heffner wrote: > >>I've had no luck locating a troublesome tortoise for Terry Blanton, but, >>just for fun, maybe an archaic fish will do? >> > >Vesica Picis on Mars! Wait 'till Gibson hears about this. Yeah. Given the way Gibson was reviled for suggesting that there were bacteria in a Mars meteorite can you imagine the reaction to the notion of lichen or even fish! 8^) BTW a good fish fossil like that might be worth $100. although these guys are pretty competitve: but there is hope when you see how pricey some of the competition is: It all boils down to quality. When FEDEX or UPS opens a Mars office, there should be a great web based business available, if combined with the berry fossil business. 8^) Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Mar 12 09:44:44 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2CHiTnA014915; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 09:44:30 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2CHiKI5014871; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 09:44:20 -0800 Resent-Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 09:44:20 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <001801c406b3$51497de0$c828010a arghou.argcorp.argworldwide.com> References: <001801c406b3$51497de0$c828010a arghou.argcorp.argworldwide.com> Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 11:45:22 -0600 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: thomas malloy Subject: Martian fossils? Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-DCC-CPI-Metrics: Clear 1161; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 Resent-Message-ID: <0cNloB.A.PoD.zbfUAB ultra5.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53522 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: In an interview last night on Coast to Coast AM, Richard C Hoagland said that he has seen Mars Rover Photos in which an object which looks like a ball on a stalk is seen. He believes that this is a crinoid. He went on to say that they destroyed the object in question. Well, I suppose there are more where that one came from. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Mar 12 09:45:12 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2CHivnA015121; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 09:44:57 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2CHip52015075; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 09:44:51 -0800 Resent-Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 09:44:51 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <40510F30.3010002 eol.ca> References: <40510F30.3010002 eol.ca> Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 11:45:48 -0600 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: thomas malloy Subject: Thoughts on Orgone Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-DCC-CPI-Metrics: Clear 1161; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53523 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: >Dave Marett posted; > I have also tested DC charged plates. The fluctuations begin to >become noticeable above the circuit noise at around 2000V and >increase considerably as you approach 5000V. Of coarse, the >fluctuations in this case occur in the voltage only. Higher voltages >suffer from the formation of corona and would have to be performed >in a high vacuum. So, Does this fluctuation increase in the potential power with voltage? > The Advantage of the AC is that the quasi-static field is renewed >and sampled thousands of times a second and allows for the use of >safe voltage and current levels. Quasi-static, how does this differ from regular static? > The Experimental Life Energy Meter which employs this effect uses >only 250V AC at a very small current. Touching the plate causes no >significant sensation. The last time I get bit by 250 V it was a shocking experience. >I have also noticed that the human body contributes a strong >fluctuation to the plate current, even at a distance and in the >absence of motion. Given that it is a living organism, I would expect that to be the case. >This is perhaps further proof that a new form of energy is at work >here...Of coarse much research needs to be done in this direction. I agree. > Over 4000 papers are available at the Scirus website on ZPF and I >encourage everyone to pursue this emerging technology. What is the URL for this Scirus website? >For those who would like to get a head start, equipment is available >to observe these effects at www.heliognosis.com Thank you for introducing me to that website. > I have a copy of DeMayo's book on orgone accumulators. If this design can cohere the energy, than putting it in an orgone box or blanket should increase the effect. I just recalled Reich's having heated sand to incandescence and them putting it into the accumulator. As I recall he got a tan with his clothes on. This makes me wonder what that was all about. Another thing that just occurred to me, a friend of a friend is dying of cancer, They were quite amazed when I recounted the story of cancer remissions that resulted from spending time in an accumulator of under a blanket, and Reich's death in prison. Another thing I just thought of, negative orgone, take some radio nuclides and put them in the accumulator, it is said to devistate life in it's vacinity, but energy generally works best with two poles. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Mar 12 10:13:17 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2CICunA026486; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 10:12:56 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2CICnsu026400; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 10:12:49 -0800 Resent-Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 10:12:49 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-Id: <2.2.32.20040312180857.006ad044 pop.freeserve.net> X-Sender: grimer2.freeserve.co.uk pop.freeserve.net X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 2.2 (32) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 18:08:57 +0000 To: vortex-L eskimo.com From: Grimer Subject: Madrid and LENR Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53524 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Before WWII the four British railway companies were the LMS, the LNER, the GWR and the Southern Railway The initials stood respectively for London Midland and Scotland London and North Eastern Railway Great Western Railway (know by Brunel enthusiasts and trainspotters as God's Wonderful Railway) My only excuse for imparting this archaic morsel is that whenever I see the term LENR the groves that my childhood has ground into my brain railroad it into transposing LENR into LNER. Which links me to the Madrid atrocity and the question, will it ever be possible to make a LNER (sorry, LENR) bomb? Since we do not know with any certainty whether cold fusion works, and if it works, how it works, I imagine that no one can say yes to this question - but more importantly, neither can they say no. As I see it, there are two tiny clouds on the horizon which could be precursors for this eventuality. 1. The F&P lab explosion. 2. The Mizuno experiments. Perhaps some Vortexian can answer the following hypothetical question. What would the yield be in tons of TNT if all the Deuterium in, say, a 10lb block of saturated metal is transmuted to helium? If it should prove relatively easy to make a LENR bomb then the implications for terrorism are pretty obvious. One of the reasons that prohibition failed in the US was that alcohol production is relatively simple and therefore virtually impossible for governments to control. I believe something similar is happening with some drug or other, the name of which escapes me, which is now a momma and pop operation, and spreading out of control. What would the consequences be of a similar development in the LNER field? World Government perhaps? After all, even with the existing difficulties of initiating a nuclear explosion it will only take the nuking of a major western city to cause a huge lurch by the world community towards that end. Frank Grimer From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Mar 12 11:05:10 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2CJ51nA007604; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 11:05:01 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2CJ4vnY007581; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 11:04:57 -0800 Resent-Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 11:04:57 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-Id: <6.0.3.0.2.20040312133723.01c43ec0 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell mindspring.com@pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.3.0 Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 14:04:31 -0500 To: vortex-L eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: Re: Madrid and LENR Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <18bKPB.A.Z2B.ZngUAB ultra5.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53525 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Grimer writes: > Which links me to the Madrid atrocity and the > question, will it ever be possible to make > a LNER (sorry, LENR) bomb? > > Since we do not know with any certainty whether cold > fusion works, and if it works, how it works, I imagine > that no one can say yes to this question - but more > importantly, neither can they say no. I think we know enough to say this is unlikely. CF reactions only occur on the surface or near surface. CF is not a chain reaction, although the heat from an ongoing CF reaction can cause it to increase. It requires a solid state metal, which would be vaporized as soon as the reaction begins to go out of control. The only danger from CF that worries me is the possibility that it might be used to make radioactive elements. > What would the yield be in tons of TNT if all the > Deuterium in, say, a 10lb block of saturated metal > is transmuted to helium? I can compute this, but the answer is not useful. First, the answer: 10 lbs = 4.5 kg 106 g Pd = 1 mole 4.5 kg Pd = 42 moles Assume the Pd:D ratio is 1:1, which is ridiculous. (Let's say this is Pd black, making that slightly less ridiculous.) 42 moles D = 84 grams D 1 kg D gas produces 575 million MJ fusion energy 0.084 kg D produces 48 million MJ 48 million MJ = 1.7 million tons TNT (megatons) This is larger than most thermonuclear bombs today, which are usually around 200 to 400 kilotons, I think. But it is not a world record. The Russians once detonated a 50 megaton bomb, as I recall. For conversion factors see: http://www.processassociates.com/process/convert/cf_all.htm Anyway, this is not realistic for the reasons I gave above, and because in a real atomic bomb, only a tiny fraction of the fuel is used up before the bomb disintegrates. If CF bombs are possible at all, I doubt that a ten pound model will produce more than 10 or 20 kilotons -- a Hiroshima bomb. What's the big deal? > If it should prove relatively easy to make a LENR bomb > then the implications for terrorism are pretty obvious. So far it has proved next to impossible to make a LENR anything, even a matchstick. If LENR is ever produced I expect it will come from high-tech factories similar to those used to manufacture advanced batteries or fuel cells. > World Government perhaps? > > After all, even with the existing difficulties of > initiating a nuclear explosion it will only take > the nuking of a major western city to cause a > huge lurch by the world community towards that end. I do not see way that would bring about world government. On the contrary I think it would make many nations more suspicious than ever of one another. I assume it would trigger some old fashion conventional wars, just as the 9/11 attacks did. - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Mar 12 11:08:48 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2CJ8jOL008803; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 11:08:45 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2CJ8h8h008781; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 11:08:43 -0800 Resent-Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 11:08:43 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Reply-To: From: "Keith Nagel" To: Subject: RE: Madrid and LENR Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 14:34:06 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 In-Reply-To: <2.2.32.20040312180857.006ad044 pop.freeserve.net> X-Rcpt-To: Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53526 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Hi Frank. you write: >If it should prove relatively easy to make a LENR bomb >then the implications for terrorism are pretty obvious. >One of the reasons that prohibition failed in the US >was that alcohol production is relatively simple and >therefore virtually impossible for governments to control. A few years ago I watched 8 fuckwits with box cutters destroy several billion dollars worth of real estate and 3000 lives right in my backyard. No nuclear missile or LENR bomb was required. Much worse could have been accomplished. Your concerns are misplaced; the threat comes from humans and not technology. >I believe something similar is happening with some drug >or other, the name of which escapes me, which is now a >momma and pop operation, and spreading out of control. That would be methamphetamine. This drug was invented in the 40's by the German army. Usage waxes and wanes over the decades, but is limited by the fact that the side effects are so detrimental that serious users tend to end up dead or too badly debilitated to continue. It's interesting to note that this drug is provided by our Air Force to pilots during bombing missions. This came to light during the war in Afghanistan, two of our pilots bombed a cadre of Canadian soldiers while under its influence. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/2657675.stm Look up "Go Pills" on google and you can find out more... The military says the drug is safe and effective for killing other people, but a deadly menace for recreational use. You may believe what you wish, but as the hippies of Haight-Ashbury used to say, "Speed Kills". K. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Mar 12 11:23:02 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2CJMtOL011253; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 11:22:56 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2CJMsuw011238; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 11:22:54 -0800 Resent-Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 11:22:54 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <40520EE1.A836F608 ix.netcom.com> Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 11:26:25 -0800 From: Edmund Storms Organization: Energy K System X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77C-CCK-MCD {C-UDP; EBM-APPLE} (Macintosh; U; PPC) X-Accept-Language: en,pdf MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Madrid and LENR References: <2.2.32.20040312180857.006ad044 pop.freeserve.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53527 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: So far Frank, you have nothing to worry about, and this is the opinion of a pessimist. The effect requires a very special chemical environment that is easily destroyed. Once the temperature reaches a few hundred degrees C, the reaction will stop. On the other hand, once people discover how to make small, high-powered energy sources based on this phenomenon, they can apply the energy to a laser and destroy anything within sight. The military will always find a way to turn anything into a killing machine. Fortunately, terrorists will be satisfied with ordinary explosives, which are more effective because they can be used by a moron Ed Grimer wrote: > Before WWII the four British railway companies were > the LMS, the LNER, the GWR and the Southern Railway > The initials stood respectively for > London Midland and Scotland > London and North Eastern Railway > Great Western Railway (know by Brunel enthusiasts > and trainspotters as God's Wonderful Railway) > > My only excuse for imparting this archaic morsel is > that whenever I see the term LENR the groves that > my childhood has ground into my brain railroad > it into transposing LENR into LNER. > > Which links me to the Madrid atrocity and the > question, will it ever be possible to make > a LNER (sorry, LENR) bomb? > > Since we do not know with any certainty whether cold > fusion works, and if it works, how it works, I imagine > that no one can say yes to this question - but more > importantly, neither can they say no. > > As I see it, there are two tiny clouds on the horizon > which could be precursors for this eventuality. > > 1. The F&P lab explosion. > > 2. The Mizuno experiments. > > Perhaps some Vortexian can answer the following > hypothetical question. > > What would the yield be in tons of TNT if all the > Deuterium in, say, a 10lb block of saturated metal > is transmuted to helium? > > If it should prove relatively easy to make a LENR bomb > then the implications for terrorism are pretty obvious. > One of the reasons that prohibition failed in the US > was that alcohol production is relatively simple and > therefore virtually impossible for governments to control. > > I believe something similar is happening with some drug > or other, the name of which escapes me, which is now a > momma and pop operation, and spreading out of control. > > What would the consequences be of a similar > development in the LNER field? > > World Government perhaps? > > After all, even with the existing difficulties of > initiating a nuclear explosion it will only take > the nuking of a major western city to cause a > huge lurch by the world community towards that end. > > Frank Grimer > > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Mar 12 13:11:36 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2CLBUC0007422; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 13:11:30 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2CLBPXd007385; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 13:11:25 -0800 Resent-Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 13:11:25 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f From: Robin van Spaandonk To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Thermochemical-Electrochemical Data Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 08:11:10 +1100 Organization: Improving Message-ID: References: <007201c4083b$e41831a0$aa09bf3f computer> In-Reply-To: <007201c4083b$e41831a0$aa09bf3f computer> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ultra5.eskimo.com id i2CLBDC0007278 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53528 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: In reply to Frederick Sparber's message of Fri, 12 Mar 2004 08:11:11 -0600: Hi Fred, [snip] You may also find this of use:- http://webbook.nist.gov/chemistry/form-ser.html >These tables of data run 12 pages. Good reference info well worth printing out. > > http://www.pg.gda.pl/chem/Dydaktyka/Fizyczna/chf_epm_cr_01.pdf > >Regards > >Frederick Regards, Robin van Spaandonk George Orwell was 20 years off. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Mar 12 13:11:40 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2CLBaZr030879; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 13:11:36 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2CLBXOZ030854; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 13:11:33 -0800 Resent-Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 13:11:33 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <011901c40876$74c75480$8837fea9 cpq> From: "Jones Beene" To: References: <6.0.3.0.2.20040312133723.01c43ec0 pop.mindspring.com> Subject: Re: Madrid and LENR Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 13:10:32 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ultra6.eskimo.com id i2CLBKZr030804 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53529 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Jed Rothwell responds to Frank Grimer's observation, > > Since we do not know with any certainty whether cold > > fusion works, and if it works, how it works, I imagine > > that no one can say yes to this question [CF bomb] - but more > > importantly, neither can they say no. > > I think we know enough to say this is unlikely. CF reactions only occur on > the surface or near surface. CF is not a chain reaction, although the heat > from an ongoing CF reaction can cause it to increase. It requires a solid > state metal, which would be vaporized as soon as the reaction begins to go > out of control. I agree that it is unlikely with Pd-D. But that is not the necessarily the real implied threat from CF research. There exists such a high level of "offical neglect" and even active attempts at marginalizing promising CF possibilities (like Claytor's work, perhaps) that it almost makes one wonder. Does the offical and semi-official action (or inaction) not indicate that something akin to high-level paranoia is afloat, beyond that which even alternative-energy advocates and CF experimenters may be aware of? For instance, one of the most powerful and least-used simple techniques in all of physics is spherical implosion (spherical convergence), but one scarsely sees it mentioned in textbooks. I don't think official neglect could go that far. Yet, here is the only simple way in all of nature that low grade energy can be raised in intensity by 12 orders of magnitude merely by applying geometry - and it isn't being taught. Look at the Farnsworth Fusor - Richard Hull has probably produced more fusion reactions in his garage using spherical convergence than our entire $25 billion fusion-boondoggle, but who has heard of him in the Dept of Energy? No experimenter that I am aware of gives more than passing thought to the military implication of their experiments, but that doesn't mean that there are none. I doubt that even the most radical CF experimenter has has taken the time to see what happens if a marble of fully loaded palladium black were to be imploded using high explosives. I'm almost positive that nothing would happen. But that doesn't mean that nothing would happen if highly pre-energized isotopic borane or lithium deuteride were to be spherically imploded in a precsion-crafted setup. It is just that level of 'similarity-in-principle' which may be enough for certain physicists who have worked for the Pentagon to become warning-flag wavers. But that also implies a level of paranoia that may not be justified by balancing risk and rewards. Actually there is a whole area of interest that borders on SciFi fanaticism among some conspiracy-theorists and "wannabe spooks" about the subject known furtively as "pure fusion" weaponry, and its subsets "red mercury" and "ballotechnics". If you are interested in getting a fuller dose of fright, go to this site: http://www.financialsense.com/editorials/douglass/2003/0311.htm But beware of the MIB. I got an immediate barrage of hits on my firewall after just visiting the site for a few minutes Jones -did you hear the one about the restaurant NASA is starting on Mars? Great food, no atmosphere! or The Cepes were a bit cold ! or That hamburger tasted like it came off a Beagle ! I know, I know... don't quit your day job... From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Mar 12 13:22:28 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2CLMGBP009699; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 13:22:21 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2CLMFFY009687; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 13:22:15 -0800 Resent-Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 13:22:15 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f From: Robin van Spaandonk To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Structures on hills norteast of Bonneville Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 08:21:53 +1100 Organization: Improving Message-ID: <1ca450t28vkn21s91qlud4ne529ih8un37 4ax.com> References: In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ultra5.eskimo.com id i2CLLvBP009634 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53530 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Thu, 11 Mar 2004 22:27:42 -0900: Hi, [snip] >I messed up the URL references in the prior post. Slightly corrected URLS >follow. > >It can not be confirmed without additional photos, but it appears that >there are structures or there is some kind of structure visible at the >horizon line at 2313,63 in the Spirit panoramic view of Bonneville: > >17crop-A067R1.jpg> [snip] This is so desolate and empty. If I were standing there, my first thought would be "let's go home!". Regards, Robin van Spaandonk George Orwell was 20 years off. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Mar 12 13:59:18 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2CLxBLc016978; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 13:59:11 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2CLx8lh016959; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 13:59:08 -0800 Resent-Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 13:59:08 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Authentication-Warning: eskimo.com: billb owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 13:59:09 -0800 (PST) From: William Beaty To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Ethics and life-energy meter. In-Reply-To: <40500C5B.3080504 eol.ca> Message-ID: References: <001801c406b3$51497de0$c828010a arghou.argcorp.argworldwide.com> <001201c406b9$d5a6c790$c450ccd1 MIKEBY3NR533HT> <40500C5B.3080504@eol.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53531 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: On Thu, 11 Mar 2004, Dave wrote: > To all, > > "Observations of Vacuum fluctuations Suggests the Existence of Zero > Point Energy (ZPE)". The second experimental report available at > www.heliognosis.com outlines the method to detect and amplify vacuum Is this intended to be a secret invention , a "black box" aimed at non-technically skilled people (new age community, etc.)? If it's supposed to be research equipment, you really shouldn't be hiding any details about what it does (such as neglecting to post schematics on the website.) Holding back proprietary information is fine for things like RF amps or bench supplies, but for physics experiments, hiding the details in order to force customers give money for the priviledge of performing an experiment is extremely unethical. If your goal is to convince other researchers to replicate your results, but you want to be paid before giving up certain details about how you performed the experiment, or if you're trying to artifically drive up the price of an instrument by witholding information, you are really in the wrong business. Hiding details and refusing to publish discoveries for all to see, that's something inventors do. It has nothing to do with science. Personally, I would never in a million years buy such a device without knowing everything about the internals. I'd need to be able to build it myself... but then I might buy a pre-built version to avoid the hassle, and to guarantee having a standard unit so I'm on the same page as anyone else studying this issue. As the vortex-L moderator, I've considered adding rules to this forum to ban anything resembling "self promotion" or selling of products. (((((((((((((((((( ( ( ( ( (O) ) ) ) ) ))))))))))))))))))) William J. Beaty SCIENCE HOBBYIST website billb eskimo.com http://amasci.com EE/programmer/sci-exhibits amateur science, hobby projects, sci fair Seattle, WA 206-789-0775 unusual phenomena, tesla coils, weird sci From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Mar 12 14:18:45 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2CMIc6l020549; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 14:18:39 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2CMIa8p020533; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 14:18:36 -0800 Resent-Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 14:18:36 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f From: Robin van Spaandonk To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: A relatively easy CF experiment from 1991 - again Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 09:18:24 +1100 Organization: Improving Message-ID: References: <6.0.3.0.2.20040309153352.01cf2878 pop.mindspring.com> <001a01c407bd$dc690520$8837fea9@cpq> In-Reply-To: <001a01c407bd$dc690520$8837fea9 cpq> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ultra5.eskimo.com id i2CMIU6l020485 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53532 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: In reply to Jones Beene's message of Thu, 11 Mar 2004 15:09:09 -0800: Hi, [snip] >Robin van Spaandonk writes, > >> EUV or low energy x-rays up to about 1 keV is exactly what one would expect from hydrino formation.... The occasional high energy particle from the Deuterium reactions is a consequence of fusion following on from deuterino formation." > > >The possibility of hydrino or deuterino formation seems to have been nullified by one of the testing procedures. You must have missed it on page 3. Here is the relevant quote: > >"With Polaroid film: Loaded Pd samples were also photographed using Polaroid films (Viva, 3000 ASA) and films sensitive up to ultraviolet wavelength. In both the cases no fogging of the films was observed after an exposure time of 60 h This test implies that the emission from the planchet may not be visible or ultraviolet radiation." Note that it says "sensitive up to ultraviolet wavelength". The minimum energy UV that hydrino formation puts out is 13.6 eV which is in the mid-UV range, not the lower end which the film used is apparently sensitive to (though there should be secondary radiation at lower energies). Furthermore most materials are opaque to such frequencies, resulting in their rapid degradation to heat, or transfer of their energy to electrons ionised from other atoms. And it would seem that precisely those electrons were being detected. > >Without any UV to indicate the necessary first few stages of hydrogen shrinkage, I can't see a way that hydrinos are involved. They can't just skip those early stages. The experimenter used sound and nearly foolproof techniques. Since all of the D2 or H2 loaded palladium samples fogged the X-ray films, but not the film sensitive to UV and since the spectrum was way below any kind of fusion event, this cannot be hydrino or cold fusion either. Only some of the higher energy UV (low end x-rays), or a few of the resultant ionised electrons would make it out of the metal. Not all fusion, just the occasional fusion reaction. Note that they did detect a small number of high energy particles. > >But the study was well done, and it contradicts many preconceived notions. a tentative conclusion: "The main part of the radiation perhaps consists of electrons in the energy range of few tens to few hundreds of eV with intensity of 105 to 107 particles/s." Which hydrino formation could account for, as set forth above. > >Hmmm... I wonder if the radiation could be - not electrons at all but another, lighter lepton...say, an electron antineutrino with varying degrees of mass/energy due velocity ? Is there any reason to believe that anti-neutrinos would have a larger absorbtion cross section than neutrinos? Note the extreme measures that need to be taken to detect solar neutrinos. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk George Orwell was 20 years off. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Mar 12 18:58:45 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2D2wcP9014803; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 18:58:39 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2D2wLGd014728; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 18:58:21 -0800 Resent-Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 18:58:21 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <40527809.A66D1EB9 ix.netcom.com> Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 18:55:05 -0800 From: Akira Kawasaki X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en]C-CCK-MCD NSCPCD472 (Win95; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Vortex Subject: [Fwd: WHAT'S NEW Friday, March 12, 2004] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53533 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: -------- Original Message -------- Subject: WHAT'S NEW Friday, March 12, 2004 Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 16:39:19 -0500 From: "What's New" Reply-To: whatsnew bobpark.org To: Akira Kawasaki WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 12 Mar 04 Washington, DC 1. MISSILE DEFENSE: DEPLOYMENT IS ON SCHEDULE, BUT WILL IT WORK? A GAO report released yesterday points out that the components of the mid-course ground-based system have not been tested in "its deployed configuration." Many problems, such as finding warheads in a field of decoys, multiple interceptor launches, nighttime intercepts, adverse weather, and finding missiles without homing beacons have not been tested at all. Nevertheless, the Missile Defense Agency says it will put a covey of interceptors in Alaska as early as July. The General Accounting Office is the investigative arm of Congress, which is controlled by the Republicans. But yesterday it was Democrats on the Senate Armed Services Committee who focused on the testing issue. The Director of Operational Test and Evaluation in the Pentagon admitted that the system is not even far enough along to use Pentagon computer programs that would indicate whether it would actually work. 2. DEPLOY NOW, TEST LATER: WE CAN'T SIT AROUND UNTIL THINGS WORK. With the administration requesting $10.2B for missile defense next year, Sen. Carl Levin (D-MI)questioned whether deployment would violate a 1983 federal law passed after Ronald Reagan announced his Strategic Defense Initiative. The law requires new weapons systems to be tested under realistic conditions before going into mass production. The Soviets had vast fleets of sophisticated ICBMs armed with hydrogen warheads. SDI never came close to being a credible defense. But what's the urgency now? The Alaska site could only defend against North Korea, which might be able to set off a nuclear explosion, but would be hard put to build a warhead for an ICBM -- if they had an ICBM -- and they know they'd be toast if they tried to use it. Against this awesome threat we need to spend $100B on an untested defense? 3. HUBBLE REPRIEVE? NASA ADMINISTRATOR SAYS "NOT ON MY WATCH." There was brief joy among astronomers yesterday when they heard the news that NASA had agreed to have the National Academy of Sciences consider the decision to cancel another Hubble repair mission on safety grounds. But later in the day, Sean O'Keefe, the NASA Administrator, punched a hole in their canoe. He made it clear that while he was willing to have experts look at the decision, there was nothing they could say that would change his mind. I called Ann Thropojinic, a veteran astronaut at NASA Headquarters, to help me understand this. "You scientists just don't get it, do you?" she sighed. "People don't care what's going on 13 billion light years away. They want to know how you eat spaghetti in zero gravity. You should have thought about that before you let Hubble go up without a permanent crew." THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND. Opinions are the author's and not necessarily shared by the University of Maryland, but they should be. --- Archives of What's New can be found at http://www.aps.org/WN You are currently subscribed to whatsnew as: aki ix.netcom.com To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-whatsnew-47101V lists.apsmsgs.org To subscribe, send a blank e-mail to: From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Mar 12 19:57:40 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2D3vUXI025890; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 19:57:31 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2D3vUj7025879; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 19:57:30 -0800 Resent-Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 19:57:30 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f From: FZNIDARSIC aol.com Message-ID: Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 22:57:26 EST Subject: Fwd: Announcement for Steve Elswick of New Energy Conference To: vortex-l eskimo.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="part1_f2.38057a01.2d83e0a6_boundary" X-Mailer: 7.0 for Windows sub 10712 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53534 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: --part1_f2.38057a01.2d83e0a6_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --part1_f2.38057a01.2d83e0a6_boundary Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Return-Path: Received: from rly-xi04.mx.aol.com (rly-xi04.mail.aol.com [172.20.116.9]) by air-xi01.mail.aol.com (v98.10) with ESMTP id MAILINXI11-4db4051f46c255; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 12:34:28 -0500 Received: from hawk.mail.pas.earthlink.net (hawk.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.22]) by rly-xi04.mx.aol.com (v98.5) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINXI43-4db4051f46c255; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 12:33:32 -0500 Received: from sdn-ap-027castocp0173.dialsprint.net ([65.179.240.173] helo=oemcomputer) by hawk.mail.pas.earthlink.net with smtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1B1qP4-0007jG-00 for fznidarsic aol.com; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 09:24:59 -0800 Message-ID: <00ce01c40856$da5aa600$adf0b341 oemcomputer> From: "Hal Fox" To: Subject: Announcement for Steve Elswick of New Energy Conference Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 10:22:51 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00B7_01C4081B.F94E1640" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-AOL-IP: 207.217.120.22 ------=_NextPart_000_00B7_01C4081B.F94E1640 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable NOTE: CALL FOR PAPERS=20 Arrangements for the 2004 ExtraOrdinary Technology Conference are being made. This Conference will include the yearly New Energy Conference normally sponsored by Institute for New Energy. The conference is being planned for July 29-August 1, 2004 in Salt Lake City. The conference admission for the entire conference is $249.95 and 199.95 for spouse. The conference will be cohosted by the Institute for New Energy and TeslaTech. A 40% discount will be offered for members of either organization. However, to qualify for the discount, one's dues must be paid through August 1, 2004. Preregistration will be through TeslaTech. Due to space limitations, door registration is limited to space availability only. CALL FOR PAPERS: Speaker selection is occurring at this time, and potential speakers should contact Steve Elswick at (520) 463-1994 or Hal Fox at (801) 466-8668 promptly and have an abstract for consideration. Papers will be published in a special edition of the Journal of New Energy. Changes will be immediately emailed to those signed up on this list and posted later on the website.=20 If you have any questions please call (520) 463-1994. Thanks, Steve Elswick -- steve teslatech.info Publisher - ExtraOrdinary Technology 520-463-1994 - http://www.teslatech.info Note by Hal Fox: As president of Emerging Energy Marketing Firm, Inc. I am pleased to announce that EEMF is receiving a grant of "up to $40 million" for the full-scale demonstration of our ability for the on-site stabilization of high-level, radioactive liquid wastes. Current shareholders in EEMF, Inc. and qualified investors can still purchase shares at $2 per share until the first grant funds are received. ------=_NextPart_000_00B7_01C4081B.F94E1640 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
NOTE:  CALL FOR PAPERS=20
 
Arrangements for the 2004 ExtraOrdinary Technology= =20 Conference are
being made.  This Conference will include the yearly=20= New=20 Energy
Conference normally sponsored by Institute for New Energy. =20 The
conference is being planned for July 29-August 1, 2004 in Salt
Lak= e=20 City.  The conference admission for the entire conference is
$249.95= and=20 199.95 for spouse.  The conference will be cohosted
by the Institute= for=20 New Energy and TeslaTech.  A 40% discount
will be offered for member= s of=20 either organization.  However, to
qualify for the discount, one's du= es=20 must be paid through August
1, 2004.  Preregistration will be throug= h=20 TeslaTech.  Due to
space limitations, door registration is limited t= o=20 space
availability only.
 
CALL FOR PAPERS:
 
Speaker selection is occurring at this time, and=20 potential
speakers should contact Steve Elswick at (520) 463-1994 or=20 Hal
Fox at (801) 466-8668 promptly and have an abstract=20 for
consideration.  Papers will be published in a special edition=20 of
the Journal of New Energy.
 
Changes will be immediately emailed to those signe= d up=20 on this
list and posted later on the website.
 
If you have any questions please call (520)=20 463-1994.
Thanks,
Steve Elswick  -- steve teslatech.info
Publisher -=20 ExtraOrdinary  Technology
520-463-1994 - http://www.teslatech.info
 
Note by Hal Fox:  As president of Emerging En= ergy=20 Marketing Firm,
Inc. I am pleased to announce that EEMF is receiving a gr= ant=20 of
"up to $40 million" for the full-scale demonstration of our
ability= for=20 the on-site stabilization of high-level, radioactive
liquid wastes. = =20 Current shareholders in EEMF, Inc. and qualified
investors can still purc= hase=20 shares at $2 per share until the
first grant funds are=20 received.
------=_NextPart_000_00B7_01C4081B.F94E1640-- --part1_f2.38057a01.2d83e0a6_boundary-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Mar 12 20:23:02 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2D4MuVH023625; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 20:22:57 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2D4Mofd023601; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 20:22:50 -0800 Resent-Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 20:22:50 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <40528F37.7060304 eol.ca> Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 23:33:59 -0500 From: Dave User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; N; PPC; en-US; m18) Gecko/20010131 Netscape6/6.01 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Thoughts on Orgone References: <40510F30.3010002 eol.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53535 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: In regard to the Vacuum fluctuation experiment at www.heliognosis.com and the question of DC charged plates, Thomas Malloy wrote: "So, Does this fluctuation increase in the potential power with voltage?" This would appear to be the case but the test was performed with a charged plate analyser, at very high impedance. The actual power was not measured. The fluctuations did increase in amplitude by about 50 times from 2kv to 5kv. "Quasi-static, how does this differ from regular static?" Static refers to a charge which is not changing ideally. In this experiment, the magnetic field component has been minimized in favour of a strong electric field but still with charge in motion. The charge remains in the "static" condition for a short time between the charge and discharge cycle. Since this field has elements of change and static, I have coined it "quasi-static". "The last time I get bit by 250 V it was a shocking experience." The current is limited by the sense resister in the meter to below 625 microamps. Such a small current at 65kHz has almost no sensation. The Scirus website www.scirus.com is dedicated to scientific papers. Dave Marett From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Mar 12 21:09:17 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2D59BhP003724; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 21:09:11 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2D59Ano003713; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 21:09:10 -0800 Resent-Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 21:09:10 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <40529A12.8040900 eol.ca> Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 00:20:18 -0500 From: Dave User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; N; PPC; en-US; m18) Gecko/20010131 Netscape6/6.01 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Ethics and life-energy meter. References: <001801c406b3$51497de0$c828010a arghou.argcorp.argworldwide.com> <001201c406b9$d5a6c790$c450ccd1 MIKEBY3NR533HT> <40500C5B.3080504@eol.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ultra5.eskimo.com id i2D592hP003680 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53536 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: A Bill Beaty wrote about the Vacuum Fluctuations post: "Is this intended to be a secret invention , a "black box" aimed at non-technically skilled people (new age community, etc.)?" I have attempted with this latest paper to bring the Experimental Life Energy Meter out of the closet so to speak by providing a block diagram showing the key components. For example, the ultra-stable power supply composed of batteries and an RC filter. The current sensor is simply a resister connected to a high impedance amplifier/rectifier. Filters and amplifiers used in the device are nothing novel and can be anything with sufficiently low noise. The Life Meter uses the same components with the exception of the power supply. This is a regulated sine wave using an induction coil/switching supply. Certainly their will be many people interested in studying this phenomena who do not have the skill or desire to build such a device. It is for these people that the equipment is offered. If anyone would like to discuss further the scientific principles of the experiment, I would be most willing to do so. "If it's supposed to be research equipment, you really shouldn't be hiding any details about what it does (such as neglecting to post schematics on the website.)" Anyone skilled in the art can choose the components which are readily available for themselves. It is more important that the scientific principal is apparent. I have clearly stated in the paper the value of the series current resister and provided oscillographs at each critical location in the circuit. Bill, please let me know what details you or anyone else requires and I will publicly provide you with a solution that you can apply yourself. Since some aspects of the design are circuit blocks that I use in my work, and I may wish to apply to other related and non-related projects, I may provide you with alternative solutions which perform the same function without being of the same design. I don't think this is too much to ask... Bill, I have the deepest respect for your email list and it is always the first place I think of when I wish to share scientific information. Dave Marett From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Mar 12 21:21:34 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2D5LTVH032350; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 21:21:29 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2D5LSw0032344; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 21:21:28 -0800 Resent-Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 21:21:28 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <40529CF6.9030904 eol.ca> Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 00:32:38 -0500 From: Dave User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; N; PPC; en-US; m18) Gecko/20010131 Netscape6/6.01 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: New experimental evidence of zero point energy References: <40510F30.3010002@eol.ca> <007901c40844$6b206520$8837fea9@cpq> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <93A3kD.A.U5H.YppUAB ultra6.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53537 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Jones Beene wrote about voltage fluctuations on high voltage DC charged plates: "What you may be noticing could be related to a particular kind of charge imbalance and the effect of free electrons." This is an interesting point. Theoretically their will be almost no free electrons in a vacuum however in the absence of any accelerating plate. In the air, this may become a predominant factor. It may be possible to perform the experiment with a Van Der Graph machine but immediatly after charging the plate, the machine must be moved far enough away to not influence the plate charge. Working with such high voltages poses many problems and it may be easier to use AC... Dave Marett heliognosis From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Mar 12 23:15:34 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2D7FRk6021840; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 23:15:27 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2D7FPIQ021823; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 23:15:25 -0800 Resent-Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 23:15:25 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Authentication-Warning: eskimo.com: billb owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 23:15:29 -0800 (PST) From: William Beaty To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Ethics and life-energy meter. In-Reply-To: <40529A12.8040900 eol.ca> Message-ID: References: <001801c406b3$51497de0$c828010a arghou.argcorp.argworldwide.com> <001201c406b9$d5a6c790$c450ccd1 MIKEBY3NR533HT> <40500C5B.3080504@eol.ca> <40529A12.8040900@eol.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53538 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: On Sat, 13 Mar 2004, Dave wrote: > Bill, please let me know what details you or anyone else requires and I > will publicly provide you with a solution that you can apply yourself. Excellent! It's just that whenever I see anyone selling anything, my alarm bells ring. Conflict of interest, possible exaggerations and distortions as part of advertizing. One thing I would suggest (if you haven't already tried it...) assume that the results are just an artifact, and then try to track down the conventional origin of the noise. Is it coming from the battery bank? Capacitors in the amps? Even better would be to measure the actual noise contribution from the various sources. That would help pin down the fact that the "orgone" signal is a true mystery and not just 1/F noise coming from an overlooked but conventional source. That technique is also the sort of thing outside critics look for. If someone is only trying to prove their case, that's an earmark of pathological science. If they instead try hard to *disprove* their own case, that's a very good sign that the many other possible mistakes are being handled. About high voltage... I've noticed that a highly charged object will remain that way for a very long time if it's suspended by a very thin nylon fishing line. (Or use 3 lines to prevent it from swaying.) The low surface area and immense length of the lines gives huge resistance when compared to most other insulating supports. If the suspended object is smooth to prevent corona (or has gobs of silicone caulk on any sharp portions), then the field surrounding it should be very strong but with only DC components expected. For proof of principle, it would be best to eliminate all complicated hardware. Do a "Faraday" experiment. Just crank up the voltage so custom amplifiers aren't needed, then use something with well known noise characteristics such as an oscilloscope. And nothing else. But if the frequency of your mystery signal on a charged object is very low, then the signal probably can't be detected directly by a nearby 10meg probe on a scope being used as an e-field antenna. By placing the scope probe into the strong e-field you'd be forming a capacitive divider on the scope input, and hence receiving any fluxuations in the e-field from the object. But the 10meg shorts out all the low freqs (forms a highpass filter, few pF in series, 10meg as load, few KHz cutoff.) But with an extremely high impedance FET probe (or perhaps just an opamp voltage follower with a floating input as the pickup antenna, output feeding the scope,) any weird AC signals in the space around the charged object would be detectable without much equipment. The input impedance would have to be a few thousand times higher than 10Meg to get down below 1Hz response. Floating JFET inputs easily do this. And more interesting, if you're right, such AC signals should only exist when the charged object is held near the scope probe. Removing the object and its strong DC field should not affect any AC environmental noise component seen by the scope probe, so if the noise does go away when the e-field goes away, that's verrrry interesting. Very low frequency noise ('flicker' noise or 'one-over-F' noise) was a feature of other weird-science claims: http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://shaka.com/~kalepa/gwrphome/circuits.htm http://amasci.com/freenrg/grav3.html http://amasci.com/freenrg/misiolek.txt http://amasci.com/freenrg/grado.html Also note: signals with fractal components have frequency distributions like 1/F. Mmmmmmmm... fractals. (((((((((((((((((( ( ( ( ( (O) ) ) ) ) ))))))))))))))))))) William J. Beaty SCIENCE HOBBYIST website billb eskimo.com http://amasci.com EE/programmer/sci-exhibits amateur science, hobby projects, sci fair Seattle, WA 206-789-0775 unusual phenomena, tesla coils, weird sci From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Mar 13 01:30:42 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2D9UZer031608; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 01:30:35 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2D9UXMe031595; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 01:30:33 -0800 Resent-Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 01:30:33 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <003c01c408de$4814c860$c864a8c0 win98> From: To: Subject: trace on mon mars sky Opportunity Sol 4 Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 11:33:02 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53539 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: I had noticed a sky trace anomaly at full size image located at page http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/p/004/1P128541655EFF0205P2353R3M1.HTML at that time but not investigated further. After seeing the photos with title "It's a Bird, It's a Plane, It's a... Spacecraft?" at page http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/p/004/1P128541655EFF0205P2353R3M1.HTML I revisited it. Trace appeared only right panoramic camera taken at 12:18:58 Mars local solar time, camera commanded to use Filter 3 (16 nm) but not on the left camera taken at the same time(?) and the same filter (http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/p/004/1P128541655EFF0205P2353L3M1. HTML) Trace does not appears either on other shots taken within minutes covering same sky patch with both cameras with different filters. So one can think the trace was caused by a dust on this specific filter. But this is not justified by the absence of the trace on a subsequent shot taken by the right panoramic camera with the same filter (http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/p/004/1P128542198EFF0205P2354R3M1. HTML) Therefore, it could be transient object either on the sky or on the camera, affected by the filter changing operation. On the other hand there is a similarity between bright trace in dark sky photo, where the trace is attributed to a real moving object fast in the sky. Trace is produced by the 15 second exposure time there but, I dont know the exposure time of the day time photo. Regards, hamdi ucar From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Mar 13 05:29:01 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2DDSuer030198; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 05:28:57 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2DDStov030185; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 05:28:55 -0800 Resent-Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 05:28:55 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <004101c408f6$67c29940$7cfea8c0 newmicronpc> From: "jonfli" To: Subject: Minato PM Motor Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 06:26:26 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53540 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: All, See the latest Minato PM motor developements at- http://japan.com/technology/index.php Jon F From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Mar 13 06:48:34 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2DEmUer011060; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 06:48:31 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2DEmTRt011046; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 06:48:29 -0800 Resent-Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 06:48:29 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <001001c4090a$288452a0$8837fea9 cpq> From: "Jones Beene" To: References: <004101c408f6$67c29940$7cfea8c0 newmicronpc> Subject: Re: Minato PM Motor Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 06:47:49 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ultra6.eskimo.com id i2DEmRer011029 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53541 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Jon, Are you a subscriber to the magazine? I couldn't get to the whole article to see the sidebar and maybe there are some clarifying details, but I'm sure that you noticed immediately the glaring lapse in logic here. That little lapse would be - that the motor still must draw current off the grid, apparently. If it is capable of getting 200-300 watts of effective output out of 16 watts of input (doubtful) then why not just close the loop and get it off the grid? The advantages of that far, far outweigh the tiny added cost of a 16 watt add-on generator. They go through all these contortions to make the point of overunity but yet it fails the only valid test by not being self-powered. This is the question that any journalist with more than PR mentality should be asking and yet it wasn't answered satisfactorily, or if it was it was somewhere hidden. Do you know? Park will have a field-day over this one. Jones ----- Original Message ----- From: "jonfli" To: Sent: Saturday, March 13, 2004 4:26 AM Subject: Minato PM Motor > All, > > See the latest Minato PM motor developements at- > > http://japan.com/technology/index.php > > Jon F From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Mar 13 07:00:46 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2DF0fk6029861; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 07:00:41 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2DF0cpX029843; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 07:00:38 -0800 Resent-Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 07:00:38 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <002a01c4090b$d5c711e0$8837fea9 cpq> From: "Jones Beene" To: References: <001801c406b3$51497de0$c828010a arghou.argcorp.argworldwide.com> <001201c406b9$d5a6c790$c450ccd1@MIKEBY3NR533HT> <40500C5B.3080504@eol.ca> <40529A12.8040900@eol.ca> Subject: 1/F fractals WAS:Ethics and life-energy meter. Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 06:59:50 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ultra5.eskimo.com id i2DF0Zk6029824 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53542 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: A Hi Bill B, > Also note: signals with fractal components have frequency distributions > like 1/F. Mmmmmmmm... fractals. Now that is quite a little teaser. Could we entice you to expand on that idea ? Jones From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Mar 13 10:43:45 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2DIhUer014884; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 10:43:31 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2DIhFse014785; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 10:43:15 -0800 Resent-Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 10:43:15 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Reply-To: From: "Keith Nagel" To: Subject: RE: Minato PM Motor Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 14:08:38 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <004101c408f6$67c29940$7cfea8c0 newmicronpc> X-Rcpt-To: Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53543 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Hi Jon. As I remember, the Minato motor was a variation on the Hamel spinner, a rotor with PM's which would continue to spin when an activator magnet was held next to the rotor by hand. It was noted with both devices that they failed to function when the activator magnet was fixed. A similar effect can be seen with a pendulum, which can be made to swing in a variety of patterns without conscious intent. The article didn't really say much about the new version of this device. I guess when the machine hits Wal-Mart we'll have a chance to test one. Perhaps you (Jon) have more information? Thanks for the heads up, anyway. What does all this have to do with new energy? A lot, and nothing at all. Jones Beene makes the painfully obvious and futile point that a generator that is many times overunity should be able to power itself. I imagine he'd be the guy in Jonestown who, upon sipping from the punch bowl, would make a sour face and exclaim "This sure doesn't taste like Kool-Aid to me!" On the up side, he survives the cyanide poisoning. On the down side, he's beaten to death by all the people behind him waiting to drink... K. -----Original Message----- From: jonfli [mailto:jonfli cox.net] Sent: Saturday, March 13, 2004 7:26 AM To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Minato PM Motor All, See the latest Minato PM motor developements at- http://japan.com/technology/index.php Jon F From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Mar 13 10:52:50 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2DIqker016505; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 10:52:46 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2DIqiQI016486; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 10:52:44 -0800 Resent-Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 10:52:44 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <008801c40923$a0d167c0$7cfea8c0 newmicronpc> From: "jonfli" To: References: <004101c408f6$67c29940$7cfea8c0 newmicronpc> <001001c4090a$288452a0$8837fea9@cpq> Subject: Re: Minato PM Motor Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 11:50:09 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53544 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Jones, > Jon, > > Are you a subscriber to the magazine? No, this article was brought to my attention on a different list. > I couldn't get to the whole article to see the sidebar and maybe there are some clarifying details, but I'm sure that you noticed immediately the glaring lapse in logic here. I too could not find the sidebar referred to in the article. > That little lapse would be - that the motor still must draw current off the grid, apparently. If it is capable of getting 200-300 watts of effective output out of 16 watts of input (doubtful) then why not just close the loop and get it off the grid? The advantages of that far, far outweigh the tiny added cost of a 16 watt add-on generator. They go through all these contortions to make the point of overunity but yet it fails the only valid test by not being self-powered. > This is the question that any journalist with more than PR mentality should be asking and yet it wasn't answered satisfactorily, or if it was it was somewhere hidden. Do you know? Park will have a field-day over this one. Agreed. No mention is made of any attempts at self-powereing the device(s) as far as I could see. Minato has obviously convinced some that his device will at least save energy as in the convenience store fan example. His comment of an average efficiency of 330% is rather curious. To me, the input and output measurements are basically meaningless due to the lack of qualified supporting data! Jon > > > Jones > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "jonfli" > To: > Sent: Saturday, March 13, 2004 4:26 AM > Subject: Minato PM Motor > > > > All, > > > > See the latest Minato PM motor developements at- > > > > http://japan.com/technology/index.php > > > > Jon F > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Mar 13 15:58:06 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2DNw0QL008281; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 15:58:00 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2DNvwC1008263; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 15:57:58 -0800 Resent-Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 15:57:58 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.2.20040313160033.00a8af50 mail.dlsi.net> X-Sender: stevek mail.dlsi.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9 Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 16:00:40 -0800 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Steve Krivit Subject: New Energy Times Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53545 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: The www.newenergytimes.com website has been updated Steven Krivit Editor and Webmaster Los Angeles, California, USA From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Mar 13 16:12:48 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2E0CfQL011933; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 16:12:41 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2E0CdBJ011913; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 16:12:39 -0800 Resent-Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 16:12:39 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Authentication-Warning: eskimo.com: billb owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 16:12:40 -0800 (PST) From: William Beaty To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: 1/F fractals WAS:Ethics and life-energy meter. In-Reply-To: <002a01c4090b$d5c711e0$8837fea9 cpq> Message-ID: References: <001801c406b3$51497de0$c828010a arghou.argcorp.argworldwide.com> <001201c406b9$d5a6c790$c450ccd1 MIKEBY3NR533HT> <40500C5B.3080504@eol.ca> <40529A12.8040900@eol.ca> <002a01c4090b$d5c711e0$8837fea9@cpq> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53546 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: On Sat, 13 Mar 2004, Jones Beene wrote: > Hi Bill B, > > > Also note: signals with fractal components have frequency distributions > > like 1/F. Mmmmmmmm... fractals. > > > Now that is quite a little teaser. > > Could we entice you to expand on that idea ? Not much expansion. I noticed a couple of different articles in the 80s mentioning that if you have a fractal image, the spatial frequency has a big 1/F dependence. And if you generate a fractal waveform with wiggles upon wiggles, the frequency spectrum is 1/F. Though I don't know if 1/F spectra are invariably a signature of fractal things going on. Other things MIGHT have big wide humps with narrow shorter humps riding on them, and still lesser ones on the small ones. (((((((((((((((((( ( ( ( ( (O) ) ) ) ) ))))))))))))))))))) William J. Beaty SCIENCE HOBBYIST website billb eskimo.com http://amasci.com EE/programmer/sci-exhibits amateur science, hobby projects, sci fair Seattle, WA 206-789-0775 unusual phenomena, tesla coils, weird sci From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Mar 13 19:50:17 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2E3oBln016314; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 19:50:11 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2E3o9Pk016302; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 19:50:09 -0800 Resent-Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 19:50:09 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <4053D90D.7020309 eol.ca> Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 23:01:17 -0500 From: Dave User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; N; PPC; en-US; m18) Gecko/20010131 Netscape6/6.01 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l Subject: Re: Ethics and Life-Energy meter Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <_SBrUC.A.q-D.xZ9UAB ultra5.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53547 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Hi Bill and all, To assume that the signal is an artifact first is an excellent idea. This is what I did three years ago when I first saw it. I have tried at least 20 differerent circuits with increasingly lower noise floors and more stable power supplies. All of my efforts to make it go away have been in vane! The theoretical thermal noise limit for the amplifiers I am using including the resister noise puts the limit on the 1/F noise at about 1 microvolt. Even with 1000x amplification this becomes 1mV. The actual p-p signal is typically 20- 40mV, well above the limit. I thought the signal was due to the effects of air ions, but it is present on a high vacuum plate as well. Finally, the power supply voltage looked like a potential source of noise, but monitoring this showed that the voltage and current behave in totally different ways (see the oscillographs posted with the Vacuum Fluctuation report at www.heliognosis.com). I am at a loss to explain this phenomena by any conventional method and thus I have presented the results publicly with some confidence. I like your method of using a suspended plate, and I have also tried similar arrangements (albeit without the caulk!). The charge certainly remains on the plate sufficiently long when it is being pulsed many times a second. The problem with using a conventional scope probe is that you will see the AC signal on the plate without resolving small fluctuations of this signal of perhaps 0.02%. To see this in a current signal, a series resister monitored by a differential amplifier is required with a least a Schottky rectifier and an RC filter on the output. The resulting signal will provide an average of the absolute value of the positive or negative current. Once this is amplified the fluctuations become apparent. The misiolek.txt link is very interesting. I used optoisolators as the first method to monitor current to charged plates. This is the first place that I saw the fluctuation effect. I abandoned this method over concerns about dark currents that might generate anomalous fluctuations. As it turns out, the vacuum fluctuation effect can be seperated from these thermal and photonic noise effects. I am convinced now that we are dealing with a new phenomena. Dave Marett From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Mar 13 20:14:12 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2E4E4ln019764; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 20:14:04 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2E4E3Z0019751; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 20:14:03 -0800 Resent-Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 20:14:03 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 19:19:45 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: test Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53548 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Mar 13 20:36:03 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2E4Zsln024618; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 20:35:56 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2E4Zs53024605; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 20:35:54 -0800 Resent-Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 20:35:54 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="============_-1132883215==_============" Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 19:41:21 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Jumping dot anomaly in Mars photos Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53549 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: --============_-1132883215==_============ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" If you carefully align the following Spirit panoramic Sol 68 photos, especially the little crater on top of the hill, and jump back and forth between the two photos (using alt tab), you will see a little dot in the air just above the little crater that jumps up and down a few pixels. An illusion? In the first photo, the coordinates of the jumping spot are 379,424. A clip of the small crater and spot are attached. This might be assumed to be a bad pixel in the left panoramic camera. The dot does change brightness in response to the differing filters, however. Further, the bad pixel pointed out by Terry Blanton in photo: was located at pixel 732,286, far away from 379,424. A curious little thing. --============_-1132883215==_============ Content-Type: image/jpeg; name="jump.JPG" ; x-mac-type="4A504547" ; x-mac-creator="4A565752" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="jump.JPG" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 /9j/4AAQSkZJRgABAQEASABIAAD//gAXQ3JlYXRlZCB3aXRoIFRoZSBHSU1Q/9sAQwAB AQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEB AQEBAQEBAQEBAQEB/8AACwgAYACaAQEiAP/EAB0AAAICAwEBAQAAAAAAAAAAAAUGBAcC AwgBAAr/xAA7EAACAQMCBQIDBgUDBAMBAAABAgMEBRESIQAGEzFBByIUUWEIFSMycYEk M0KRoQnR4WKxwfAWQ1Lx/9oACAEBAAA/AP2ycvWw8vLJJXxSEnsAwT+rPnPccL9VPQXC 7SdJJKYnTh5ZA6v7m2UAZz5Oe3bifC93t1SvwZjkjfGT0Q2xye7MPPf5fPiLWU99qJ5J qGWATOq/Fo9OXPTBJXABAU6ydxnI2xxEjKwyaa1WNT2LKQi6vPs3I89+3nbgiUv0MkD2 ukes+Jfp6YolYxDGoMxZgCD2GN8+OMYYPgbok3M9luLyMEMZgmjpgrDLDIy2r25B+u+3 Au9w1MVxauSgqaa21KRxUvWKOzSoCXBkU4PsIOMDHjjfTVFw6f4ShcjuyBtvn3H04l0z XKaoVhPAJYWDxgwn3NuMYBwdv0HnfiNeK5auqjg5lIjiUKFaP8DUNOBgrrP5R9D5PA9j RUEsQsrlI6giN1mYztUqFLdKBiBocHDFmA9u23lqSmoEpVlqpPuKcjIkuLmRJSQMFEiD YByWHyHc7cAZaGpq3PXhY0CEMlwX209RnIKRblwyjDHI7MMb8a6SegppU5fSkqXSkkNw eUTLpHxeRk5AbAK/LHE2e2W5SbdWwVE0UOK2mWGYRuJKrdtTEHWunsNsHJGw4IW8xwEQ U9srQuTgvKjZ7gd9/wD39uC9RdrnSmnCWWsqo0kJKwmIFQV7lmYZHYf8cKfNU019EaJy 5deqMDSJoTg6cHOk/r5/bgQnL1+CIByxdcBVA90XYAY/r+XDbFaHrcueYKaVRtgfE742 8nYf+fHEaai5fpm6VddKcTZxCY5JYmMmOx9mWGAds7fPxwChq4aOvwa4SQErpJdzsdRB ye/tI3Pbtx9LBR19w1RXoU35Dp6tQOqd/ZiPA274Ox/xwXuVNXUNMjRQGpTAInCK2RpG +pzq+Xn5d9+A0dXVyoNDVDMhy6U8rRtAO2piGGxOQMeT2HG74nmKn/iKSwXW9ou5ZZI5 QgA33qJMjGdP/GeJNveqv0s2mjq6erpEEtTR1Egk6EbMUVhGrGNPd7Sykk6cbjvulu1v pW+FrJUp3GRudJB7dwCRjH9gPPGBg5czHUm9pHLIxECfEzjXJgkqAFwdidj47HsBKpLJ FXVay1rmohXSYiC3uAzp3bOr2nIJA4wuX3vJK9FSUMVPRQoG6klNE8s4OVMdNKvujkGl W1nHtzvvwBgoqmmmLU7y0kxPu++WevhY5P8ALiZmVRnJUbAJhfHByNqmRlpapJBVV34F LLGenSTygaunBTg+1woLN2yuBwToq7mCjrhRvy40j3QJb4qg0tKf5WXDamJfYKdwc79+ 44yuslXJWRPRpH8dTaTcIXjWTRTquiPKbKv4gIyDjbGOAMd5vN5uqUFFLTRSBkVsUwG+ 6nZCCNwTnPG24QXShrGgu9cCnTQosHUgZWIySTqOoaQBjwR9ciHJUWZCqxV0/wAQcYX4 uUnJz4IG/fscbnftxIFLfGAZJ6rQwBT8WU+07rv1N9sb8RFt8lTC1/qao9SnzimpXkgR ul7PdGp6Tag2d/IyfHGFPSVdzcVouNtt6yHoqldSNM0nSJ2iKZVZCNy3fGRv5LSU0VsC yV0CzoME1SKqw4xnVpYEhRntjyOCMPNfKFHC2au21lRMDGtNDGiz0zDfW7NFgg7oNJ7/ AEI4UrlXtXOZIzULTEn8spChcHtg4xjG2kfpwPWroqBXlozLNOwxNGZS2V7j2tsPd5yS e2+2W7l+WpvCMZ6kW2nH5+oXXUM47xHue+SM98ZPGFbXcvUsz0trlqJK9R/Gzx1bFZYi ToXTpVgA4J3JHj68Cmo0qPxRCZCTnLgOT+5Hb6ed+OZk+1ry9BbWvnKvpd62832dJ6mn W7cs+iXNXNlrrko66S2zz2evtdFVUldDHWwzRPUUcsqAQy62AifTso/tSWbm2ZRF6Pfa dt86xySvLXehHP1ht6CFRqVqutoaalEhYhY4Vcyu35UIVmBFPtWegBiFDzZznc+Qb7ar lU0dx5b58tPMvKPMdJNCkbxvNbbnbIpJ6GtpJ6a4W240j1VuuFFVQ1FLVSgvoZuVftI/ Zs5z5tsXJ1g9U7Dd+ZOYqirpLHZoLrUJXXart9ouV+raagjqKeIVE9NZbPdLrLDGxkWi t9ZUaenBIy3ff6XlcwRy0slwqqiA9RVprjIjwsUADjIXSTkrlSCDnxnjTy/DdK2FmpaC 7ukTMY5ZKoysh1BdSsX1K2MDOx349vEQWJPiRVUdZE7NGzTsjVMhGOk2gkyBRl9LtgHJ HbgVapuYKiQiejFPCDhKmOCOGQgEgN1UbWcjByTnJJ7nHE2rmvcL4S11V1i2DFBG7xjH 53eVslewAGSDnuOI8U7SsGamit84PaqijkKkHsQg8H5H99+Da3C+hQBdrMAAAAaFsgAY APu8DiG5s1Iwj5XrxeFbaWFJpKkKDvnEwVRlhjbuRj68QJqa1ljLUCrnqlGv4SlqTB8K xz+LKmNBR8lAF3yNz248jhulwUqJkakUYNO6l5ioIAXqasZxjxjbfvwBnqOWaWoWCS11 tFVxtmSpqKmNoagnI0RIqalYEFzqJypxvjibXc00dPEkMUCmHGMkR9tI31ac+Pr+vGhr jbnigmooxLWTOVEWVbUQoIUIV0nO/c/TIxxM6NI4WXm24f8Ax6DvGDJJSawQCN6bUCDG QxJH1744NxV9kaJIrVB8RTR7pcCySioyACokZRIxXZvfsM7b8fG6VAHTp6YnJIGEQ43+ uMnP7cc5/ZMo7lRegvI1jremgep5yoI5kQqkkkXPnNBcp2cAhc6SAVzgk4zx0X8VaeU5 lt1dIsstVgojN5kzKMB1I7A5/t24i3CedGjmjoyKV2LRtojAOpSe4+YIPb/HHLXr1dY6 Xn77IXMZoVno+XPtS26G9QgEVL0nPvoR69+kdtlpGVDCjUXMvqHYbhWGqZI2tdJcIoC1 fJRwy9PX6njd6gUdFV1TdIeymkCsmexbIAwfkOx8cD7HX3m1wTJLarpFCS/uMyjC6gdm D522x5xxviNuq5mnkerSqJPRjqKp5VMhJ9qocrqCk53Ge2fnJn5muVqAhuFOsdMdo5Ol GhK9++Sx9uCD/wCeJtBzBfY0qKqi6CUs0YRnqKZJlYBtR0EkaTuMkYyOIcFztldLJ96V MZlycrA3Q3Lb4ABxnx9Rx40vLgYgfGbEjarONj+nEGnZkOuno3oFOxEgTV375jx3IyP2 42VYBRC0gV5CVZ1yrMAMgZG5Gfn8zkcQopoba3UaaYqcEgTMBuc9icbnf6fLbhgt3NPL Ku71tsetYoqx4eDKuDuzF0OxHjOfpxJqubrfMhSnsMUcXYNNDRyEDx7umDsAO2P9k64V djuDRLUVEVHIkhaKKFuhI7kEaFaJR7guTg4wB/cbcOb7Xy8qrVXyz0MJAAS/U7XBnGNW ELpJpyN+w9o4iSc98nVsdLJXStQqZG+FuVPUilttbNp90UNPCmcon4hDgDSQcgjjy4ep npzbIkN2vcbxjJT4asenbGnO7dMknSQM7ZO+/HLX2bPX3kCH0K5BqYrs9OtXcedZKcXO op2q4jLzxzNKjT/Bq9MHMTqdMDlcEec46Hk9V/Sm59Oe+81255SAYxHVSxOvt9o1dFv6 fke/yGxZ4Oe+R7jTLFBzpaaWlTegjqZKiWWrmIAMEcgj3ZUwwDAbDPnih/tB83WK28ve m91udXBHbrD6/ehVwmliESz1C3L1KsHKtFJCZU0vDBcOY6Ctrw0kUi2qCukpuvVpT0tR d1B6oem1fW1T1lfPSCONGpas3Fo6arm1lWiREjJJQZcq+F3Hnhkh9ULFWg0tPcaFqTdQ zAM5XtnqaMk4A77kb+ePYL9ypDUJNScwW2iqZm0u1d1amJwMsFhjEemNwclm8r7c9+CE 3O1qpJ1+OvFkrocL+WlGNOPBlRsbY8dvHniJVeoHJqJVSU1bC6mEfFKkv4cMWQQyp0wq e44yozgAHinrr63+nVraRae922KQM3UaZxKVI3OcxZGGzsDtjHEFfXv0nKgvzvYA5ALg ySAhiMsCOh4ORxX9t+1J6XwtJPcucrXUTRKGWnhqZIywB2wGiZdwSd/PFX85f6h3plHJ JbY3ip0tmZkqTUUumcuDFpGmHXkBdR1bDPz4oit/1E+X7jJLDaXiqChIULJTOe5HlRnf /wBHFNc4f6h/NNuCizW5NbO4ctT0Ug06crga1xg75xvvxzVzZ/qMerdV1I/iIqCE5Gr4 SGPSO2cxTgjA/wC/7inqz7efqKnUaHnOjElR7KimlSaSeSMEkJSOZ8QTBzvIDnSMduAk X28+ZaBmkqnusczHJq7xWrXUbHJOqOGWZ9C7kgDHsIHgjhZv/wBvXm2rjZob1JUK2Q3w 0zJT0wxs6RdYLGTspKAE7AnHFG3X7bPq28shsNVW3pjn8JGNRpO+xE9UACD7Rj5bbcce 8s/bD9auTuVbfyhzDY/UOgW0tcow9HytfKikSSrutbXvJBWwTSxVCFasfiwyumchHZAC XLlP7XPP1ZUGejq/UqvfWc07cu8zM4O7eyKWT3AElBpBywKjtx0NyX9sX1Lpq+Tr2T1g uWenFiHlDmiGK3EM/wDGHqkpURPp6f4GG3RicMCbZ58+2H6jc1crWXl2lsPqLe509SfS O6yR3bkrmC2UdHScpeqvJHNdyr5q25slOsdBb7NU1VPVatAqKaNk1EaTdUHrjz5dx94W jmb4x4C0tfZYGqTV2unPtSoqGM6w9OSRukmjJ1qc+3cMVJ9qrmWKEwR3+da2H2mE1E2o uCFII6wB9wYd+BVP9vTmqx18sHNC3KppUA+7pKeoSmJqNTByzvMxkHSA9pxuc8Rq/wC3 ZzdzNWJBa5bjSRHSFaaqEgGxXOY5gT2GTjHz4A3v7RXqRd4ZIaHnU27Ca6wySVp1QsBh R0qgaSG+eR4x34oi/wDqL6hVMMr23muru07FzItNVVx3JyQOpUjGWOMA48DPFfHm/wBU ySTU3/J3OK6pAye+B8VsM9uHjmzmDmS7U5+GkvVK+CC0ddPGTtjfpzKcefnwj2zl7na4 tI8VZXaIwGqWq5aio1RZwAGM7FTq3ycjH6jhgiunLXLxKXSuq0r12ISvlhBcf9AB85Pf uRwEvnqNRiOD4eeSVDIywhpy7Ehdss27DHcHbO/FeXfmnmG5ApDROYXGA/RjY4PkNqB+ X+3C5Fyq9e3WrKhqSQnUNTSKC3yAQ7EZJx3/APLvaeQZp9KJcqWVc7LURyz/AC//AHkY GNxjPDZVen0tNTq1X8BUIciNKWkEDBgBkyZHvUjsCNm38cVre+RamZnNHEaQjYGNTGW8 d4iud9/Pk8I78q35Z4Y6pVlhgkL5miMgYYIIJctnbG3b9eLFoeR3uEUUlNTpDJGASaSM U7McAbmIKT7iT37+eLr5Hp4aJ5LdWVUFrZY0/iK9Wk+Iy+OmjKC4ZdOoknsfnvwd5uko rRAGpqyO5NIudFIzJnK6sDqAAHPywP7cI9ovlwsrvU0tproEu4FJUySSRsrxRt1VAIYE e7DE77Ht24z5liukNG9faUSDUpeUSxCV/wAoY4YEYJZs+T4Hnjnar5kpUrWX4SsuFwLa bgDULJFFCC2h4oZcrCxkDKWUliPb8uLf5P515XoIkMdjrHuJxgPUU7qXyD/LZMHHuGM/ QHhlruZ+YK4s9zs6222uMUEgpKaFp5f60aSJsy4jKsA4ABye/FK82113Z36DTU8JyS0D NBkfUxupz+x+o3PFeZmO7Xi5AnuPvGrGD5H8zweO47hQzVsqK9zpIE21fhSLtj5pgHtx 9caWlstFTOl/p3eod43SJp1JCoGwcjB3Pb6cJdXZaG8t/Iaodv8A7lIIOfO41D9j578S LL6cWanrUkurERSlRTRu7jEgJZhurA+04OB4zxaF05TtVNRxijpY2jKgatKN/QN8lAd9 v85PA6j5Mt8iGSWkebOwWJlQofmcr2I2AB4kScn0q56FNVQ43GJjscf9P0+X9hxCew3O jlhaghqKoSPonSQtMEjAJDASNhcnYkd+Jlw5Sq6uATTQmAAAvhNGPaN8Ie4O+P8Ajhfb lSzXhUt9PUoK2nYvNhmLaHGhc4UHuD3J3/bhysXK8XK2mSZVqEODuCwOCWz+ICO2P+3D PcKu0NAsg+77Y75VZK2njlEpUZ0xaI8hx3JPcdjxWd05dtl0dpbjXLUQqcj4KSSmyo2G DjbYg9tvpwDgksVlaYWSkrqupRPdHV1YrY8BtulFONMbas5YblRjJ7BUvVfXcxJLDcG+ 6UClURl6IfHtwBASN13GR/txQnMPLd1eZwloq3poGaWKsptEXxDHKlDIGDyBR7gH2Gcj c54C2aOuiqRG9iu6BW3lM6ADBIznVnHb/wDvex63miGjp6aGZqlWDELHUVBkCtoA2BJA bbBx3A+XCXer/U1SEdMdE7atK9sd8jf/AB+nfhQ+It53M2CdyNbbE9x+Xxx2LScxNTRu jJ1JGB0g6W8gj8xJG2RtjhHNNzHWXOoloVeVagBXjlQzRwqGZg0aO4WMknBZQCcY7cab nJzXy0yTMAQ2CQYcAe0sdmfG2cbDHB5vUKtoLZBWVlMawszApCkaPHpUMWy5IUnsNPY7 HPB7lL1Vud/qFo6G3Sxw5CyfFLDUYGSCVOfbuBjHYbcX3a6qgpSlTbLRc7ldZlAuEcdV HJTwwAakcU8mFj1SFlLLksAF7Dd5iu1vnjDV8KWllHuFUqeNtxGp7Yz+mT8uNzcy2BoJ Kf7ytU6xqSOhCI5U8ZZ+nkjAwB889u/FMc8eqHLnLdPIz1CTHDHSsoxjGcYdSPp/bY8J nLvqpbebEkSz0kFPNSZmnm6cDM8TN0wC0aq/5t/cSBnA34WOdOdKnpNFHVssu4GliN8Y 2APf5b7/AKYzz/d7zdZnhlu1xq4YUmY0IWoniDzEHWDpkIYdM50kAA78bl5svC0/8VXM lCq7sGkRyuAM9QOT2074+fkHgBUepdiy8FimrJrlF7q3VXNKBESQmlCF0fiht8nOeItB 6kV9RMYpYJmDHGXZWO5I7lj4HfPb/PvMD3e9i3tRfeDCKpaSZKepkQCNo9I1qsiqVycD uM8E2tN3alRY46yOTSCcyOSTgdyHGTtvknfjOGzXfXTCaI/hyko86dQBiO7amJYb5OfO /G7mp6Cmo0S6zQSOEAVKMfCtnQuMkKdWwIyfOTtxWfx9ENlgcr/TkqTp8ZONzjz547Lt V1s9sjcXXT8Qc6NRVdsgr3DZ2z5HEixXFpbhcKiIolM8CCnOkEFllJOCMf0kHYDuTk44 kXO3JdVb4uoXSM43cY8YGM+MDsP88V3W2Q0zS/D1MciICwjkDygjPYBvaM/PH0/RQfmG 026YmsvVFZpozsp6kJkZSQP5K75xq3O/1IPE6D17mtcVTFJBU3KkiiBp6y3Sx05d9QDd SRmDyIFAIVvJyd9wp0/rNzpzbWSfcUNRTohIPxapUjZmXcLKM7jfOfpvxldPUHnm8oLV WVtIktv/AB/4GkNJMeoOniV4pMyKNOQrEgHcfPhaqLdzPe0Vqgz1KAnIIds+MHVIdv27 /Xi07FDXWi2U8VPTtSSOzLUPpUdRAFIGVKnZhq8gfLuOIfMNvlrIS0dUTUkfl1SH3Yxj T+/f9OK+i5S5irJW+9mf4GD30zYZPex0t7tbE+wqcYAHEW4cpmdlihuJOMBoQ8+TtjGN h3/z2AIIDhy1yLb4hhLefiGAE0rBG6i5BUAlS2AcncnOfJOeHmp5Po6OMSR0Kh8ZzoTf 2j/p7d/088Q46GrhhnMCQ034YGqWENnDDAUjcEbH/fGOFimst1uFU5nvVNToGII0TqAA SD+VsDx22+mRxLktqwOaGG+QVj1YEMpiNRqpVHuEpL4IBYFQUJbt+nAqt5Pt3LP8ZNcD eZZ/eITLNKEJHU06akMgxqK+3zt24E/dgf3rQgK/uA0R7BtwPy/I8dF3XlSdQrVa6Ij3 dgdsDf3Ak/7fvwNuXK9BT0FLWWq6sJopXetj+IqGAh0AKAvtVPeTuM/LHnhZe5cv1YNM a+sFahKgJXzKpYe3dB3zhjgk9/14Tr3V3fpNBVs6UURZqKSPMUskjbMskobVKoTDAMMA nPc8UBf5bpNUsBTvLFkgO6q5A33DMcn9frsONVssZrZYkkadBkF06rhBnOcoDjBP0PF3 WqgpLBTI1JEWdgC2kgEnAY52Gck/37b44PtU2eWNamtpzHVpvTaGSIyy40lZQqkTLpJI Vjpzkj6lLXLd7k2axqWhoI/5bfCrGXUErkvFuxK4OSB8/PB83f4Vlp5FSamc6IZVVQDI Blvc2Sdh2wMeN88Y1tTD09Sw7uMjIXY4GD22znfgBUUNTJGHzPpqGKKOq+Bjc4GcbjGw HbzxuoLa1ocTy07SZOcyBX7nP9Wd8Ht5G3bhygkNxaPpR/DNEdQKhUDEjGn8PGcd8Nnb 9uM7vScwiNTGgMI89IbDSO51/pgkfr44wp7Y91gRJ50p5KL8Zlwy9TVhCrCM+4DvhiR9 OCtFT0Dfw8yRYB0l0VULb47hQcbZ89+NNfarNTtFiamoRJIQZ511BhpLYUomoEdySex4 iVdJdIlQcv1lmuinZle2ipcbeGnAA39u2Pl240C08yMAzUVMGIBYCihUAncgDOwB7DwN uHO9Xarv1MywLpjCkEqq5G2k7rg9/wBOKlFrmq6qanWveMwgSTIZZsMjMyhQFOPzDvuD k/IHiHU2+nt5zFTO8ufdLlSP1OoAnJ377cCrgzVcCxxkTTKzHpDcpnGCQdsHcHv2+vCd Ny5zDNJqFvJiznV0UPt386ge2PH+wkwWeejDZpiszgLgouQc57ePPnh55Zp5VY/H0+pD sNSqPPgHPgD/AJA4LX5YaKnaoioRIMezCxkIwAOTkAecbY7ftwoCmgvNBLLXXQW4pr0x LLLD2IGPwduxzgYBx8+D1mQUdJEJmFVTxyMYJiS2p9gTrkyze3Hjzvng7M1Tc9MdFTfl wNkU+MDcYJz8vP8A3aLTZ7swQVVGwSHDpmJcajgfNs7Y3/cZ7EjeFbQkZpRkDAwiDcDH f9vlwOlMUdJCZFFMyOxVtl1nSMj2DJ+e+3z4CVHM9Yo6JZWiGwYqN1Ht7k/QHOOI1HUU V0kYJW9F4AJJwski6lJKhSEA/q33yOC5MRAW3S9eRTvgliTjGNwMknP/ABxnX3S9Q00c acq118jyRVNRpSq9HEFGJ5WmIIVm9gKe7PjHCzDRR10pqKB6u1TqcyU9RUu5U5IIKxEK CGJB3xtttjgn8eyexr3AGT2sCZchl2Ofrkcf/9k= --============_-1132883215==_============ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Regards, Horace Heffner --============_-1132883215==_============-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Mar 13 21:38:59 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2E5cfln006765; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 21:38:41 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2E5cdMC006750; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 21:38:39 -0800 Resent-Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 21:38:39 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 20:44:19 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: Spirit Heat Shield Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53550 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 8:05 AM 3/12/4, SnowDog wrote: >This is probably a good color picture of Mars, balanced for white light. > >http://www.golddirectory.com/mars/mars.htm > >The heat shield in the distance is so shiny that it prevents the PanCam from >adjusting any of the filtered images. It's also the only thing that NASA has >imaged in visible color, in days. > >Craig Haynie (Houston) That looks like a picture looking back at the parachute and shell. The heat shield is on the northwest corner of the Bonneville crater. See pancam photo: which shows heqt shield looking a bit like crash debris, and not nearly as shiney as shown in the navcam earlier. Could just be a different sun angle. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 14 06:56:23 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2EEuJ3R031337; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 06:56:19 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2EEuCii031307; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 06:56:12 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 06:56:12 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <002001c409d4$6a1e3da0$8837fea9 cpq> From: "Jones Beene" To: References: <001801c406b3$51497de0$c828010a arghou.argcorp.argworldwide.com> <001201c406b9$d5a6c790$c450ccd1@MIKEBY3NR533HT> <40500C5B.3080504@eol.ca> <40529A12.8040900@eol.ca> <002a01c4090b$d5c711e0$8837fea9@cpq> Subject: Re: 1/F fractals Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 06:55:38 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ultra6.eskimo.com id i2EEu83R031285 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53551 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: William Beaty wites, > I noticed a couple of different articles in the 80s > mentioning that if you have a fractal image, the spatial frequency has a > big 1/F dependence. And if you generate a fractal waveform with wiggles > upon wiggles, the frequency spectrum is 1/F. Though I don't know if 1/F > spectra are invariably a signature of fractal things going on. Other > things MIGHT have big wide humps with narrow shorter humps riding on them, > and still lesser ones on the small ones. What I was getting at specifically was wondering if you were onto any kind of 1/f --> ZPE connection. They may be superficial, but there seem to be some coincidental links between the two. For those who don't see the tenuous connection, it relates to the ubiquity of 1/f "noise" (aka "flicker" or "pink noise") and the possibility that ZPE is a 4-space phenomenon and that its "bleed" into our 3-space is responsible for 1/f. Some parts of fractal geometry are also a visual accounting of how a 4-space object or distribution would look from our 3-space perspective. That is one way how 1/f, ZPE, and fractals could be linked. BTW, the original meaning of "fractal" was "fractional dimension" although has now become a catch-all phrase for almost any kind of mathematical art. Like I said, it is a tenuous connection and probably coincidental. But it is fascinating that 1/f distributions are found in any many types of non-electrical phenomena that are arguably anti-entropic : DNA sequencing, cognition, heartbeat analysis, ecological systems and so on. So-called Kirlian photography could be another example. Jones From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 14 07:31:32 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2EFVQ3R003738; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 07:31:27 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2EFVQTp003726; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 07:31:26 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 07:31:26 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <40547B58.5010502 rtpatlanta.com> Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 10:33:44 -0500 From: Terry Blanton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Spirit Heat Shield References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53552 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Horace Heffner wrote: >At 8:05 AM 3/12/4, SnowDog wrote: > > >>This is probably a good color picture of Mars, balanced for white light. >> >>http://www.golddirectory.com/mars/mars.htm >> >>The heat shield in the distance is so shiny that it prevents the PanCam from >>adjusting any of the filtered images. It's also the only thing that NASA has >>imaged in visible color, in days. >> >>Craig Haynie (Houston) >> >> > >That looks like a picture looking back at the parachute and shell. > Yep. The backshell and chute is also visible in this NavCam image: >http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/n/069/2N132492544EFF1800P1946L0M1.JPG< From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 14 07:41:38 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2EFf9Ea020915; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 07:41:13 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2EFf6Zt020894; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 07:41:06 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 07:41:06 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <40547D8B.7090301 rtpatlanta.com> Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 10:43:07 -0500 From: Terry Blanton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Jumping dot anomaly in Mars photos References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------080301000308090508020306" Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53553 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------080301000308090508020306 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Horace Heffner wrote: >If you carefully align the following Spirit panoramic Sol 68 photos, >especially the little crater on top of the hill, and jump back and forth >between the two photos (using alt tab), you will see a little dot in the >air just above the little crater that jumps up and down a few pixels. > The Martian Air Force seems to be a bit overly cautious in observing the rovers. Maybe they have monitored Earth television transmissions and recognize the similarity between the rovers and Number Five from "Short Circuit" who was equipped with a powerful laser: --------------080301000308090508020306 Content-Type: image/jpeg; name="ShortCircuit9.jpg" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline; filename="ShortCircuit9.jpg" /9j/4AAQSkZJRgABAQEAYABgAAD/2wBDAAkGBwgHBgkIBwgKCgkLDRYPDQwMDRsUFRAWIB0i IiAdHx8kKDQsJCYxJx8fLT0tMTU3Ojo6Iys/RD84QzQ5Ojf/2wBDAQoKCg0MDRoPDxo3JR8l Nzc3Nzc3Nzc3Nzc3Nzc3Nzc3Nzc3Nzc3Nzc3Nzc3Nzc3Nzc3Nzc3Nzc3Nzc3Nzc3Nzf/wAAR CAB9ANwDAREAAhEBAxEB/8QAGwAAAgMBAQEAAAAAAAAAAAAABAUCAwYBAAf/xABAEAACAQMD AgQEBAQEBAUFAAABAgMABBEFEiExQQYTUWEUInGBMpGhsSNCwdEVQ1JiFiQz4TRTY3KCg7LC 0vD/xAAaAQACAwEBAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABAgADBAUG/8QAMREAAgICAgECBAMIAwEAAAAAAAEC EQMhEjEEE0EUIjJRBWFxIzNCkaGxwdGB4fAV/9oADAMBAAIRAxEAPwDJR2bXr7N3lOgyu8dT WNvihIx5MbrbyqqhxzgDI6HiubPG5StI9BhS9NF8Nq7hhtDZ7N0NHHiyLcQypqmLtR0SO5jC wv5DqeVxlP8At9q0w8lw+oxZfDjLcdCG60vUrP8AimJmjX/NhO4fpyK2QyQyLRhn42SALFLI G3Fyee9M0ilxrsZW7tcYEkQGOhPeq5UgVYyjjxAyspz7HGKRjLSKbgzW1t5phjktjx8x5z7G mX3JH7iGbcZixXZGTwAcgVfF6ojQbcS2h0pIzHuuCfldCOPr36UqQzS4/mLDGxfBHJGeastF dHFgdgW9Dio2HiQB+YE5OWAIAyT7CjV9A9zZ6f4QtnCz3gmGRkQA7CPdj1z7Vqw+O6+cZpXo 5rHg+NYTc6UkhaPmSEuWO31X39qmXx+KuJKszLGORQTKZGPcCsTTTI4fY756oQYwffNJxsDV BMN3GmThSTSuLAiM8hwZD+Hr04oJEsogDO5kOcHoKeVIFBcLZkbczAjpjrVbZA+acWmnNbA8 yZLMOcVXFOUuQ/SoTBCsbSCVmUcKPWr73QhK3kXbtcjJPShJbFZOaLeCU5x71E6JWimSRhGC Rkn07UyRKBdrP8zLz9ae6JRqNQRXGYZf4vcCqG1ZakaG3ykEStyQozTxSpHexr5UFKxxwPqM U6pIeiiRQ54yPb/vXOywTdxCketk2SZwdw+tN40GpbFaLLnT7K7yLqzhkPrswfzFdJQiVSww l2gX/AdPx/DWVMcDEm7H50rxJlEvExvopbRLiIn4e6ifdxiRSP70iwO9FE/DaWmEQadHFEYm HmhuX38gn6dK6cPFxpbRhqgW58NWFwp+SWE9jE/H5EEU3wsPYIofwhcwyh7W5imA52uPLb+o P3IqmfiutEogdJ1iY+WdFkMg4D7lAx9c4/Wsvw80PaeqALjQ9WivUtPgSJrjJRUlRxgdSzKS F+9OsMpaFbpm90rQbeyjt5pooXvETBlVeAe+3PT69a3YfHjjX5kbsbJEOw4rSkATeIvEtpoM 8cCR/FXoIaSCOTb5K/7mwcMewx9aoyZlFE6Pnl3qTz6hdXkcEVubhy3lxjhPp/U+tc7KlNjK bj0BOWdi3c9cCl0hJO2Hafp0zgzY2rjgHvVc5roCCYYizlGw/oB2qtuth9y/yTBA0tyPnHAR B2pLt0guNIAt7zFwDsCLn+arZQ0LQTcQz6k8i2eH8pdz5OMChjSitjU5OxSUlB2yZH1NXa7B WyaqzuqoCT0+UEml0FRbHVnpF4yki1kVf9Up25+3Wq3GTHj4+SXR1rFFciV2dgcHHArNLPxd I3Yvw9Vc2SVFQYVFA+lZpZZN9myPj4oqki55QELSuiM5+VutbXdaOHGNs0kYxGmTn5RVy0j0 EVpIuX+lNaGonlQBxQcY3Yp0NnjNOqQaKryd4LVpIwC4KgA9OTillKuhWDrqmFzLbkHGflb/ AGk9/YUqz+zQGFQXUMiJJIPhw5AXziOQeM8dvc1uwJupGTyM0FFw9ya31n5xi81CwJA8t1fd j0AOTW6M4nLfYVaSWl4SLW4hlZeGVWwwPoVODT2mAu8geZs/C3cNxio6CKE8R6EzhJLxoN3z K00DBXXsQRnjjiq3OBBIvieOzvVvLaIvZT58yBQVKpzg8jhhwccjkj3ql5VFkGlz4vhjjSW3 tWES8yG44LD0XaeD78/Sj8RG6I0MZtVMmk+fFa6jEZkI+VQssIPfvz6f0p5ZLWgxSvZmLfwr pFyhkt728Yt8zZdS2T3YYzmsE0/c3Q8bFNWmWN4Msu17dj/4Kf6UiiyxeDD7nP8Ag+3UjF/M MHI/hg0GmwfAx+4UfDqmPYL6XH+ryxn96qeFXdg+Bj9yuDw3FbkhL2bn0QZoyxWN8CvuE2+l pbjBuZZVz0dVpfRXZPg4/cqufD+m3DEvHIp/2NjNOoB+Dgej8P6Sj7/IlLDjJmIP6dqdQTWw rxYIMXS9NU7hYwlv9TDcf1zTKEQrDBexfGI4V2wosY7bVAp1FIfivZEXIPuTUbsKQlurNog8 jmPax+VS2Sa5GbBKLcn0aYvQJ5ZYkpGSO+ATg1SsUntIOkWvYQLFbTNlizDAHPetXJ9Hn4R2 h+cVfZ310eVuaEZBJbuMUXIlHt2TRTJRRqTYtAM/ilQf1/pS5G9Cy0hWJGKAMWK7CGP/ANJf 70ie6ZS20iOoxrf3DQu4ARFKq+ACBx1PArqY1y99HGyO5b7BbezS0m8y3WMtGeJRg4PouOPv Vsceym6DIbRtWkPnKzKGwZGkKbTjorAElsfyjPHpTSiNFtgd7DqFnHLBbalfyWrqVMcyOpwe oBYc/Y5rPKUkqsahZDGjWMTF3CQXRh2jqgYEhh9CKCppWTZJrON4wl1q9xIq/wAqIoA+gPSj UfdkLrKW3TVopP8AqJD8yBuck9D9qEKUiWbw3RTTvjzK0CEMxl4+XBwTk/h54BxyelWyyxWv cbjoyL6k08/nWV5cPLuJV5juEp7g++M8VmeRt0xoScHcRzDrBlMWbUBXGSfM6Ddt9PqftVLy OLpo7EJqUbOJrG5FY2jAsAcB+mY9+On0H3oetrofskdVJl8sW5xv253/APqbP7mh6xCr/GT5 Rf4XopbBl/2b/T7UvrP7EbOnVn85ozajAdUzv65bb6fU03qv7AYO+sTMm5LZB/C38sT/AC5x +1L6rDZYNQuTNsWOEAOQSQTkBgP2zR9V3oVlmm3NzP5jTshAWMgIoGCRk/0qzHOTeyUFk1cp exKIOetCwcStlV/xqG+tK4p9hWjgJQYUAD0HaiopIm2IreS5na2V8qwlUFDwRzWNpLRxcN+p FM05AyfSnqtnfRHGPUVWxkdxQbphPDPJpkSjpClcMAw9CM1PcDVkRbW+4MIlByTxn2/sKfjF oVwTM9rZjt76aHyxsMQbcBlsk85HQ1fjlUaOP5kFHLoqiZtP02d1KsBlllQ8biOAR0z0rbjy /KY3Ed6pq66PaS2scHmJDCsSoWIWTOCSSCCAXLMf9WFB4ArPknJvRbSSM5pV5e6jLcGWXcNw WUKoVW3dBgcZGM1W01sidgmrkRXc0EbEqWViSuCSMjJwf0pmwNC5t5PU8elLyFCMrGsbAnev 4uMYNS9hHSh9at1sklyXCkKuMnBODjgE8kYo65Wxm21Q98PeH7PR4JbvVi8tvE/mEFTGZJQC ERFzk8nnn9KecE1okVTtglkm6Pe7AMI9pI6ZzIxP0yf0rFnl+0Z0cL/Zl3kqspUAHDMMkeix pVKLU2RhG7a2B1DYx0yztVsHosjdESBHbsGQYKHnbyPwLx+dLk7BK7ORyL50rMP80/o0p/8A xpdiuyDvGysgUg4VOvtH/wDsKGyKyJnbMhbHCs2R/wC6T+i0UEM0c5jn9AyKPbEa/wB60YmP HoLPHrV3Y1EWx2qWCivpUtgo4SM81EMZ6ynmudathI5kxKBu+gNZ60cTxlyyxNcKatHeXR7H bFI0mQ8VyKraCcFMlQxLHpimYDo4PbGKi0EE1DSre/BMhKS42iQDkfbuKdSoy5vGjl37mdEM llqptmZT8ypIMZSRcdx3FXxkcjJD05uLCIB5VwTcQG5iY4ZFYAv2B54Bxwc8Gna9xUNofEGl aRZTR6dZ7L5QQm14yYgwwWVVGA2MjJqSadJhVLaMZIrXVw7+XPK7c7B1UfQA8CqpApyeihZL ROR5Oe4eYsT9hUQKNFp+itOAmqWQghJVk+HjO6RSD1bcSDnGeKFrs0x8aTW+y650a1tbSP4e 7EE8Q3CJwJUc56Yxw2DjPf6U0LbL8njxUFXZCFZptu+JmcjbujhIyPp249KtTS9zMsU30hza W2yII9p+IYZ5MD1xxn0JFZpxjKVs6eCFQUZIJMMLHmNSc+49P7Cq3jiXcInEt4F4WIY47njG cfuaakgqKSpHvh4CuGiU8f1B/cCo4xYHFMh8Ja4IECY+p77vf/c350vGNkcEc+Ft06QJ1z06 kYx/9o/KmpE4I55cIyBFH6Y2j3/ufzNSoonFEiAowqhRnoBimRKoi3H7UQUVmitAOHNSyET1 61CGe8PqI9ViXhmYMx77RiqnujjeHvKjXdqnR3EcApWtBJDp0yKVIlnu1EJ4cZqLQDvfjr70 UMSB5/rUqwA93Z2920ckqDzIzlX7jH708ZOJRm8eGXb7A5NLui2UvIIkA5BgL/mSatefXRkf gpfxCCawjMxWbyjGh2lvK2tgdCQDj9c1R8Qm0jO8KV/YhpqnTb1Lme5it4dxQmAjec9OPT3N WT2hcDUMltmnYwTgR6fevPcs3AWZHA9Wf5elZcuZQidKSxrcTltc41CVDJJLDGoja4lb/MPY H3weOwFDBllKK5CwyfPsZwtHyIpIz3xG69foK1KaNPy2TZZT1RyPvRtPYxAo3dWA+lSwkCKF AOHPTGKjIe5oNBIk4oN0RkSDUVg9iJ4Jo0Q8T2zRbAVk9c9+1GwET71LAQPHTpUIVkgHH7ij ZBH4YIOqFUB+SNiWPfpSNbRyPCX7Vms3dyeTUaOymeY4H3odhPbhgdvrSNe4Dv1+tMkE4CRS yIjwbnB+9KmMS7c06+wDo79vc0yTZG0iicfxIGnYxDO+CBT/ABJsdCR1CZxwce/pVjxpIw5M 3OXGKFtzpdwkDXryIWyPNjB6MerDgcE+1Y8uOlYjhKC2ZvU7ZYEedV+RjyV7HritHjyckY8s adj+xSHSNFhW0khnur3gyRuMFj/Ln+X0wcViy48mTLclpF+NxjCkI9XNyk7aZcxmM2rbZEzn dL1Zz+eB7AVsjFJWUOTbAfh1zuVcUzaYLkvcvVJQMpJIvH8rkc0lxRank+5atzqUC5W8ul7f 9Zv70flfQyy5V7jbQNYvTfR2l7I06THarPyyHHr3B9Kl8dmnx88pS4SNQQT0qw3URNQhAkk8 0NMmiJPfvQ0AjnjpzTEIMck0AHDjOMULsDKyc55GAcZoohxqlkId+B+dBWAVeGIit5PIv4Gi Xt3zUTtnN8JfO2aLtx+9R9nSR7OQfc0JBR4g7RyeKX2CdzweenpRRDxPGQRUkEqnfZC7A8qp NVwVzSBN1FsujYPGrqTtwD9fpVvH7+xFK0mvcmZ0tkFwEeR/MWOCJuQ8jdM4HQDk1bjSUbMv kTlahHtgWjOJ4JJ5SDdzTMk8jj8bA498D2oSbcqDg4whdBslq9xvtbpTDG4KiVl3K3OBsPHz fbin9Ll2Zc/kRmkonYtF0cWTLd3SXi2jBhBLEVyc9M5GO3bmtEYpJJIyttvZnPEVk+taxLfx zW0ZkA3qW7joQFHp3qqcGyA76Qd0Xx+qPJtQBVigLMqgnA3MR79fWk9Og69wqy0K0nk2pPe7 D+IuicH7ZrPkajs1YoctG00XwPYXCgyuzKRyGkbJ+xArjeX+JYsfts0uEcK2rDr3wDZQLvto IW2DjdyT+eaqh+NRxupx/k0/7MEZ4cmmqZkjpdlb6xbGKMRyrIciJwVzg9sftit8PPhnaaVF 68T05pjWSIjvn3roRmpbRfVFLDqeTUbFoqZcE9vWj0B6Kyc5OeRQ7IQOTnFN7gOMSBgUHQSv +Y5bjPSggERyvHqT9akWBkW9ATntRZDhUH0qWRgHhdCkM+SSNwwaCdyZzvB1Y6LYB9uuaLZ0 URjOcY9c1WnbCWNgZPamqwWeGMdetGO9Es92Pp2xQa1sNlTkGNwQOVP7UkPrRJ7iwTQ7rfb/ AA7k74xx7rW3NCny+5h8TNyjwfaD2bfLbr1C73wR3JC/tmkaqJZ9XkP8kKob3yLe/XYjzR3W +SPlT8xwG/IdPU1aqS0c/JN82mCyS6Pdag1xqV1LaXCFTGVRm+XHfCnHOehBoLbKm0MLrU4G EksKzXUUy5FxFCUjOeh+Y5HTvU5pMIFN4mdFit4IEiVSw8yQl8EnvgjgY96PNg5V7FP+KxXH zSyKwVCcrEVBAHvzVcnYXJlUV1OifLI6seTg45NM4KtjLK10Rh8QXkcv8O5l2DoN+Riuf5Hh Ys3aNmLzJwXY6tdb8Q3sRmtmuljjUsLgMUXHcKerfbNZcf4Li5XGKotfmWtpfyNNpuq6rAwO pX9heJGgZ45ovMIzwuHA6mr/AP4UYu8chYeVD3Vfo6/6HJuNIl2i7szA7DO+1k3KT6YPSqs3 jeT48q7/AE/0/wDZqxTnNXjmn+q/yjh0Szuv/AajA5P8ko2NVS8ucfqX+P8Ar+pY8rj+8xtf mtoX33h+/tQWe2kKgZJQbhj7VfHzISq9EjkxT+mQmjtZREWkQh2JJB6j2rV6sJP5XokMcqto i8ZA5p+Sa0SmVlPtUIyvBBzzxzUFK8YRTzyKkeiEWGF//uaLJZAihVkBtA3CyYvyxf8AYUIu mzB4S+VsYueKE2bkdiHAPY+9CAWXxvFFummAkCjKRqcljz1HXHH0roYcC4eozn+T5TjL049g qSzRwSTXhRpSWlkWFflQdSFHcAVRFPJO0i/k8OK5PYw+GtntY7m3ud0bqSrKfMD8ZGMd/atU vEUo/KY4efKP1C9XzFvIKhlzhuoyOh965ig+SR1HJONg2n+HdbdvOhtGhKjchmYKH9F9s+pr sPHyjRwITlCfKIzu7a4tNiy/D/F7G8uFZtyMeuCw4HT78VmeB1xNnxKWTmjK2WkPfPcXV9KB cSkFOGyvfdj36fSmWIyuXJtvs5qWlQ2AhnmDyW0cT7xFmJmYcqMkHA5znB4GPepwSdikPDtj c3sAie6mhjIYQKEDbff5uQCew+tBY0wpsSzGa3mKTKUlhf8AiIeoIPP2qlqmC6HFzcq7rbrK gj/G4VQAFHTj3NOkK9g1zMEgYpMGYnHQfejKTRFoXsVAKqwzjrniqh0OdNGparbfCaVc3jRW +3dC13sVT2wAOnHerccZPoLkXXFvqelWvkSQ6xp088uARIWt5W7euXJA5yKudpbRLNNoWp2F 5ZN8ky3cjn4yOSRnkhdeCcnt6VcsazKmNDPLC7QZ57RsQHDAHhh0I9a5ebx0pcWdzFn5RUkQ i8XX9pNts53Ea8AZyGP0NVP8MxSVu1+hly+VjnKnFM0a+J1uVA1Gyt7jA/Ft2tn61y5+FJO4 P/3/AAaYYYx/dycf6osT/ALw4b4i0c+hDqP3NVt+Rie7/uWP4hdVL+jJSeForhSdPvYZh/pz g0Y+fJakit+RGLrLBxE974evrVXMlu+AOqjcP0q+P4hjfeiyDxz+mSFT2bBcBTwMVqx54tLY 0scl2DywleCP16VY5plbTKgjHpmmTBTBdKTZaD0ZiakHdmPxFWMKfjj1pZJs1lycFQM1ZHQL sh8ZEXSwf5ZZVMcbySFY2DHkcdT7d/Wul4uaMsfFo5HmQksvIPubaSBmFlA0rLlgrnaVIBx8 /p9R0q+GFRi+JTl8iWRpSAPC2nR2VnK0k3lTSOGeRGHlksMkIDxjkciphUknYuWMKSiB6nfW Wn39xalrkPBJjCLnacZ6nvyKzyUYu62O806qwCTXoCWCxXsuRzvusA1HmZUgabV4mjO2wiAI 6PKTQ9R2T9CN7rd7dCM4hgRV2BUcjP2znH6UryNsIH8Zcody3UUTqQwfBJ4PHUc9KTk+w2ES 65dSO8s+p3F3K/Ly+fsLH6AZ44GKKbsFjIf8NWFrEutF5tY8sNco0RdlcjOGPIyBgY7Ve/TS 2R/mBzavpTMBbpKvOARABj78UjyRQCg2Fvfs80bg8gH5dpBPrSuKkFBdr4Zjlv8A4N50hlKb wjDJfnHygdaMcabDsZxW7aNq1gLKDa6wSpdSbvlZTjZu9OemavhBxdpEbQfrS3+qWH+Ehwnx LBpPK/0odxHOMnoftVji5AcqMyby7jupPIukS6jHlrccxkYH4z7noQeOKotw0TvY/tbV7yGy s455ImmdVkbIkL7sYKnoWyW64HGaFLlyZpjlm4cEDXiWra48dhHttBJti+bO5V4JJ9SQSfrU y6ixcCcsiQzD9+nbNYHE7dk0mZTkE0sopjKVBEd7JGwYE5HfOKz5PHhNU0Os0uhrD4qvrWJj 8SXAHSQbv+9c7N4MeLcdCPFgn3H+WhoviLTLwAajYRkkcvH1/v8ArWZ+Hlxr5f8AQqwTh+6y f8Mi9hoF/j4a8aBj0SUcD8/70nr58XY3LyIr54KX6f8Av8FT+Dp3O6Ga3kQ9GDEVdH8RaW1/ Yr+Jw/xJp/oYSzkieySTeq4QuFHLMM9Ao5Nd3HH5TLhmoQSBv8VtWufh0k2TElV8yGTAOOhC qT+Qq2OG3diZPMirSWxnoXk6vp63qzrC28pJFg/Iw9M9sYP3rbj8fG1bMkvMyPoturOzDmCc rJbshOGHJPce3XNWLFCD+UqnlnNVJi7TtKtpNUktHupxb3SOYoTdPhlUDO716njPamx9tFQd cQzeHrq3t08/Uw8LTvNdTiNVGdqjnPAx096uU2rFa6MxrFpEl6ud5u7pWmkIOEjOMgAe+PWs M2mxxRIhL/LPhG5UEDIB7ZxVWiBQUTaYoRCJYMgywxAFvmzudvYED7dKaTTQVtEYk8m4DgJM kZLPHMflZM/mSf3NKk7Ibax0yx3zyQ2KmESARsoUAjaDz6HOa0KNjBotJPOh+HtQCrZY7wWI wcYweucU3Emj5hEY/OuWvAWlMh7kHcSd2azXvYjOs0BVlRNgI7HvQbIE2DyRh5PmBcooH06H 9aitDIaaj5d2ztcIrquTl+309PtU5sN/cVQa3qIRovipDG+CyyEPlV5Ay3Pt1q2OeURavYwk 1PXNasSi3UTAuA0SW8ce0eu4Dt+dT1ZMlWVzyLLaRotoIkAKvIi4VADgg/Xrn3oNt6Y1Gy8N Wkq6RFqQvra2eCFhE08ipEMgqpZj3weOeuKvxpVsPQo0m0uEmZXtptypnZ5ZJP8AuH5daTNb 0afE03JsPyCoZWyCOD6iskk1o6SlZzdxxkAUtDWe3en96VhK7mT/AJcj1IH2zWfN9Iy7LTIR 9qdx0TkWLcuuNpxVcsSbG5sKj1GRVxvYewNVS8THJ24h9Z+4khhSS1t/MRdyqNrLwR9COlaE 2o6MeOCcFZmr4NaXtzsZxyfm3Hdz05rTCWrOTmXHI0FeGrxohdxckyMjKB3Y8Y+/FaMcn0VI 20Nja29vvv1iMjLy83OPZRW3iuILEczRWd3ZT2UxWNLlUbYGygfjjPuapqpoL6HniTSreWxl S11ZLTVYl3Ms0rrmIkZDk5xnjsBnFWZI2riBGUvrLUk0s6q9k/wTtsM2R/CbkYPtnofes04N KxrM35T46fmaorYpfavHEoXdI7EklEI257H1ooPRJpgAAIxv5Clm6A/0HrRuyM03h0XNudSt LlgJU8mUbJMhhypIP3FXRbWgocIx3DJOAe5NNYyMPdWzTahfLGU/hXJRgwORuJxWfi2I+wOa R7eZ4SDmNypwMf0pHaJ0TQlnUHIJ5BJzS8iWXRW8tx5oldgAMdeD60rloPYbbaObp47SBQHl PUsAOByzE/ygcnsKWE5TlSCrZRDHPp92YCpWWOUK69Qw9V9j15xxWncWGqdDSa6SGMtcOkss p+VSA0UIxkNt/mbuSe1HkM1RbHr3waW0MFo0TAATyxHe69dxh3cIWBxnsKZTaBY3gstT1KbS tS0ed7eaNJYGZ5Dl3jOU3djI6EKRwCVzkZrRG2rRIpctvRK6vHvp2uZYYYZJvxpDuChvo3IJ 71lyttnVxR4R7KQaoZeQZsClYSuf/JT1kFZ8m2k/uFMscjnJq5oiOBuPp6d6KAyRbnrii2I2 Vq2IkBx+EVS1oMOgO+0yC+ZndmR8YyvTPbPFNjk1oz5/GjkuXuJ9Ot3sNQ/5iSS2jPE0wU5R MH8JHc9B3rVjaTOTKDi6ZtNPn02ez8zR2Hlp/DPylWXA/Cc8iuhCScdCC+5vZY5GVp44ZZCD Fub5vMHQgevvVM5fYsUdbC/BAEl/cQXCoEnt5Yfm4Z96jOSeTzg/anxJyTsDtMAvn1nw9pd1 oN7LE1nfwStmICRWnAHAJHA47CkyWuwJUJdJuLFrRfPtIJXHDeYCwJ+maWLQqdBFxLBdxNbx 2sEaN08mIIQR34oSpoN2CWdkk0xRkVSCRJ6GqHaYVsIvdbjtGSPTV3TxKYXllAZGTggAdcgj rVvqaC/yA38R6q+Ns8aDPJSFf7UnNgtjbw9PPcQxPKUAmvjIwKkhzt2kkZ5BIz7HpTp6DDbF PiG38vUwHlYlYkXLNk4GR3qnI9kktgXmAOu3DE9B1zVVASb6GNlbXznc9sY1YEAt8pbvwPtT QxuWkWenJLkzS6VE9pbmNdPuWupVUzyTbUTb1VVOT8vQnAyTjPSteHEodEj8q/Ms1LTnvCt1 5dm1/CuIhJv2N7MQRngnGfWrpQb2CzIahBd2su27tRbmQcRhflUeikEjHHrWSUWnTJ+ZK2vp R+EhSw2YH4Wx/L7HHQ/amSQLNToeuiyT4Z5rm2tpnKXM0R3JF6SAtzwcFgf2q7HkroLQ31q3 WSKG+jMBaRB5wgPybuzqOuxhyD74zxUzwtckbfEy74MUk5w2evU1iaNsX7EH5ye+fzpGWWVS fNcQD/TyKoluaCixmyfpV1gIgjpn9aZIFkZCcjDY4oSlTKZvZMrgVnfVFkTgJBAz1qJhM9qD O+oLhyvmNsb3Ga1xWjiZZOWRtj/wrGtjoF/d/jYSySFTwDtGAP0rZjdY2yqO5AsemxW1g2qX Lvc3ciecXJ27c84Xr+uaLioqyOVjDT7i62yPb3MkUMSLMkJwwBYZI/T9aMZNPQe1sv1OI3+m 6fcTPgyXkV2EXO1RIpDR4J6ccHtk02VXRPYwaA211LGpyu9lH2OBWVdiMPR2XaQcE9xUk9kR ZcM5tQYmCF/kc4zkCp2rGsWm1bj+IPslKQhJEkagsXb6ED+lQjGfhm6R7pljh2CJoxncSWyx 6066DDs1UyI08/mRxuQx5ZQaEkmb8CUou0RhjSIjyo40z3VAKSkalCK6RfbfML92ALLGsKk/ y7yNx+uOK04VUbMflSblQXISZpvZyPy4H7Voi9GWb2cGSRTCCnXEWXwhfXbqDLJdIqH/AMsI e31yazNWnJl+R1FRMS/MTbsHPXis7ZSaHwveS/ERGUiVGYRyxsPllwAVZh0JHTNNFhTNosHl M8atm3nyVjIz5ankqD1Izzz07VsiriRSadoT3cIguJoQdwjI2k+hFYckeJ1cWRySYP3Iqhl5 VybtfQCs/eUddE6vSFIt0zmn96AyqRSSOe1JLRnyPZ//2Q== --------------080301000308090508020306-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 14 08:33:33 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2EGXOEa005375; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 08:33:25 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2EGXJd7005338; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 08:33:19 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 08:33:19 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <405489C4.6080201 rtpatlanta.com> Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 11:35:16 -0500 From: Terry Blanton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Mating Balls Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53554 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: The pair just to the right of the triplet at: http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/m/048/1M132444465EFF05AMP2956M2M1.JPG appear to have fibers growing between them. Or are they recently separated? From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 14 09:17:23 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2EHHJ3R022994; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 09:17:20 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2EHHH5q022979; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 09:17:17 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 09:17:17 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <000d01c409e8$207ad500$8837fea9 cpq> From: "Jones Beene" To: References: <004101c408f6$67c29940$7cfea8c0 newmicronpc> <001001c4090a$288452a0$8837fea9@cpq> <008801c40923$a0d167c0$7cfea8c0@newmicronpc> Subject: Re: Minato PM Motor Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 09:16:44 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ultra6.eskimo.com id i2EHHE3R022951 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53555 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Jon, You are probably aware of the recent evolution of PM motor design where the stator "back iron" is, in effect, allowed to rotate with the rotor and the only true stator left is the copper winding - thus allowing magnets and iron to rotate in unison with a constant flux distribution and giving about as close to 100% efficiency as possible. And I believe it was you who tried to reproduce the MEG stuff some time ago. So my off-the-wall question is this. If you combine the underlying ideas of the above and if OU is possible using PM magnets with some copper windings to accomplish flux gating (which I doubt) why couldn't one start with this so-called "ironless" PM motor design and add to it by using a large tubular magnet on the outside of the copper stator (IOW a large solenoid PM with the poles aligned axially) and use the windings inside of that magnet to rotate its flux in order to the couple with a free rotating core on the inside, which would then couple to the output rotor? Perhaps that is what Minato is doing.Too bad we can't see the sidebar. Flux gating sounds good but has never seemed to work in practice, yet for it to ever work there would have to be a constant flux distribution and elimination of flux jumping and eddy losses - which a free rotating core might accomplish, even if it had to be mounted independently on its own bearings. I suppose it would have to be a low- conductivity ferrite instead of iron though. However and I suspect Keith is correct and Minato is a bit into self-delusion. ..."that guy sure talks in circles," reeled Tom, his head spinning. Jones From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 14 09:57:51 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2EHvSEa021862; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 09:57:33 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2EHvDLU021808; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 09:57:13 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 09:57:13 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <40549D65.3080206 rtpatlanta.com> Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 12:59:01 -0500 From: Terry Blanton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Minato PM Motor References: <004101c408f6$67c29940$7cfea8c0 newmicronpc> <001001c4090a$288452a0$8837fea9@cpq> <008801c40923$a0d167c0$7cfea8c0@newmicronpc> <000d01c409e8$207ad500$8837fea9@cpq> In-Reply-To: <000d01c409e8$207ad500$8837fea9 cpq> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <1vlvcC.A.hUF.3zJVAB ultra5.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53556 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Jones Beene wrote: >Perhaps that is what Minato is doing.Too bad we can't see the sidebar. > The sidebar is visible in Netscape: BiOS is your infrastructure solutions partner, specializing in providing multilingual technical consulting, integration, and support services all along the IT spectrum. BiOS specializes in bilingual IT staffing solutions. Project work involving server configuration and installation, office move projects and IT outsourcing for helpdesks and deskside PC support all fall within our area of expertise. BiOS has years of experience serving clients in a range of industries with several major clients in the financial services business. Regardless of the size of your office we can tailor an IT support package to suit your personal requirements. It's just an ad. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 14 10:04:18 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2EI4B3R030535; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 10:04:13 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2EI47EW030511; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 10:04:07 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 10:04:07 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f From: FZNIDARSIC aol.com Message-ID: <1a6.216bbd2d.2d85f89a aol.com> Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 13:04:10 EST Subject: Re: Minato PM Motor To: vortex-l eskimo.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_1a6.216bbd2d.2d85f89a_boundary" X-Mailer: 7.0 for Windows sub 10712 Resent-Message-ID: <6kbgrC.A.qcH.X6JVAB ultra6.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53557 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: --part1_1a6.216bbd2d.2d85f89a_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 3/14/04 12:58:21 PM Eastern Standard Time, blantont rtpatlanta.com writes: > Jones Beene wrote: > > >Perhaps that is what Minato is doing.Too bad we can't see the sidebar. > I see da ja voo also. I remember the Newman motion, the Takahashi motor, the Galtek magnetic motor. This things don't fit in with my paradigm of thinking. Frank Znidarsic --part1_1a6.216bbd2d.2d85f89a_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In a message dated 3/14/04 12:58:21= PM Eastern Standard Time, blantont rtpatlanta.com writes:


Jones Beene wrote:

>Perhaps that is what Minato is doing.Too bad we can't see the sidebar.

</snip>

I see da ja voo also.  I remember the Newman motion, the Takahashi moto= r, the Galtek magnetic motor.

This things don't fit in with my paradigm of thinking.

Frank Znidarsic
--part1_1a6.216bbd2d.2d85f89a_boundary-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 14 12:35:23 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2EKZGcp001655; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 12:35:16 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2EKYcVK001549; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 12:34:38 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 12:34:38 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 11:40:00 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: Mating Balls Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53558 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 11:35 AM 3/14/4, Terry Blanton wrote: >The pair just to the right of the triplet at: > >http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/m/048/1M132444465EFF05AMP2956M >2M1.JPG< > >appear to have fibers growing between them. > >Or are they recently separated? I think neither. It appears the above is a "before" photo, i.e. before the scrunch from the spectrometers. An "after" photo is at: >http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/m/046/1M132267006EFF05AMP2937M >2M1.JPG< I suspect the balls rest exactly where they were when their gell matrix surface, their cortex, lost its integrity and they started to sublimate. In other words the balls were originally both larger and both connected. What we see remaining now is merely the internal fibrous medulla. The sublimation process at this point results in the outer fibrous layer of the medulla continuously converting to powdery salts and continuously creating dessicated fungal filaments, all of which eventually ablate in sandy wind and blow away. Live fungal spores and bacteria may possibly also blow away in the process. I suspect the tendril-like things that remain between the balls are filament bundles that for some reason did not dessicate as fast, possibly because they have some special structure, like that of rhizinae or more likely the precoursers of periphyses, i.e. hair-like projections inside the ostiole of a perithecium or pycnidial conidioma. Certainly such filament bundles between two balls are more protected from the wind than others, being sheltered by the two close balls. However, there certainly are other possibilities, like the possibilty you suggest, that the balls were separated by some force, or the possibility that some structure was built between the two balls by living tissue. Funny, it coincidentally almost looks like lines of electrostatic flux between the balls. I just feel like the sublimation hypothesis is more likely. It seems more consistent, or at least explanatory to me, but it would of course be much better to hear the opinion of an expert lichen biologist. It is also interesting the way the crust forming lichen appears to implant little units of itself on the balls and munch away. It is difficult even to tell if the fruiting bodies are the same species as the crust forming lichen. It is not possible to tell if the little crustal matchstick stuff got there via spores form the ground of vie spores in the fruiting body itself. Too bad the rovers don't have lichen test kits (which are very simple) to distinguish lichen species! 8^) One thing I am certainly very happy about. That is that the "blueberry bowl" they chose to look at has the decaying variety of lichen. Those balls have to have some water content. They are not petrified. Hopefully there will remain no reasonable doubt at NASA that they are looking at living or decaying lifeforms. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 14 13:55:23 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2ELtJ2C031106; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 13:55:20 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2ELt1sp031062; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 13:55:01 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 13:55:01 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <4054D513.5010200 rtpatlanta.com> Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 16:56:35 -0500 From: Terry Blanton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Mating Balls References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53559 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Horace Heffner wrote: >I think neither. It appears the above is a "before" photo, i.e. before the >scrunch from the spectrometers. > DOH! I hate that when it happens. I've been laid up with some kind of bug and haven't been able to keep up with the rovers' downloads. >Funny, it coincidentally almost looks like lines of electrostatic flux >between the balls. > It does. And this would likely be Ockham's choice. >Hopefully >there will remain no reasonable doubt at NASA that they are looking at >living or decaying lifeforms. > But, though they may believe it, being scientists, they will never say so without impeachable data. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 14 14:39:12 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2EMd92C003211; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 14:39:09 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2EMd4qr003184; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 14:39:04 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 14:39:04 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 13:42:17 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: Mating Balls Resent-Message-ID: <6-h7iB.A.sx.I8NVAB ultra6.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53560 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: This is a correction to my last post in this thread. I mixed up my URLs. Some other minor correction and additions were made. At 11:35 AM 3/14/4, Terry Blanton wrote: >The pair just to the right of the triplet at: > >http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/m/048/1M132444465EFF05AMP2956M >2M1.JPG< > >appear to have fibers growing between them. > >Or are they recently separated? I think neither. Consider: It appears the above is a "before" photo, i.e. before the scrunch from the spectrometers. An "after" photo is at: >http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/m/046/1M132267006EFF05AMP2937M >2M1.JPG< I suspect in the "before" URL the balls rest exactly where they were when their gell matrix surface, their cortex, lost its integrity and they started to sublimate. In other words the balls were originally both larger and both connected. What we see remaining now is merely the internal fibrous medulla. The sublimation process at this point results in the outer fibrous layer of the medulla continuously converting to powdery salts and continuously creating dessicated fungal filaments, all of which eventually ablate in sandy wind and blow away. Live fungal spores and bacteria may possibly also blow away in the process. I suspect the tendril-like things that remain between the balls are filament bundles that for some reason did not dessicate as fast, possibly because they have some special structure, like that of rhizinae or more likely the precoursers of periphyses, i.e. hair-like projections inside the ostiole of a perithecium or pycnidial conidioma. Certainly such filament bundles between two balls are more protected from the wind than others, being sheltered by the two close balls. However, there certainly are other possibilities, like the possibilty you suggest, that the balls were separated by some force, or the possibility that some structure was built between the two balls by living tissue. Funny, it coincidentally almost looks like lines of electrostatic flux between the balls. I just feel like the sublimation hypothesis is more likely. It even appears that some of the balls sit in little indentation about the size the original balls should have been. It seems more consistent, or at least explanatory to me, but it would of course be much better to hear the opinion of an expert lichen biologist. It is also interesting the way the crust forming lichen appears to implant little units of itself on the balls and munch away. It is difficult even to tell if the fruiting bodies are the same species as the crust forming lichen. It is not possible to tell if the little crustal matchstick lichen stuff got there via spores form the ground or via spores in the fruiting body itself. Too bad the rovers don't have lichen test kits (which are very simple) to distinguish lichen species! 8^) One thing I am certainly very happy about. That is that the stuff in the above URL's (in the "blueberry bowl" I assume) they chose to look at has the decaying variety of lichen. Those balls have to have some water content. They are not petrified. Hopefully there will remain no reasonable doubt at NASA that they are looking at living or decaying lifeforms. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 14 17:45:23 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2F1jJAc025520; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 17:45:19 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2F1jEXw025492; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 17:45:14 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 17:45:14 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="============_-1132807068==_============" Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 16:50:28 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: Jumping dot anomaly in Mars photos Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53561 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: --============_-1132807068==_============ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" At 10:43 AM 3/14/4, Terry Blanton wrote: >The Martian Air Force seems to be a bit overly cautious in observing the >rovers. Maybe they have monitored Earth television transmissions and >recognize the similarity between the rovers and Number Five from "Short >Circuit" who was equipped with a powerful laser: A serious concern no doubt. 8^)) BTW, "Short Circuit" has to be one of my most favorite movies, and "Short Circuit II" one of my greatest movie going disappointments. The former had a great plot and some great dialog, above average credibility for its genre, and some great acting. The latter short circuited all the above in my opinion. As mentioned prior, the jump can be seen in photos: In the first photo, the coordinates of the jumping spot are 379,424. Actually the spot is not really "jumping", but rather descending slowly. The time between the above images was 36 seconds, and the spot is higher in the first image than in the second. The hills are to the east of Spirit's location. Just for fun I have clipped a pix from the large Mars Global explorer image of the region. The dark blotch to the left shows the crater at the top of the hill. That crater or depression is just below the jumping object. Spirit's view is from the left, which is west. If you size the clip just right and place it over one of the JPG's noted above, you can see that the geographical features all line up very nicely. Since the object is to the east of Spirit, it can not be a setting star or other astronomical object. One thing very strange about the region clipped in the photo is that it is very different from the surrounding surface (which unfortunately is not in the clip due to size.). The area just behind the crater has a very angular structured look. Also noteworth is that there is a fairly large object in the left (west) side of the crater. All just grasping at straws, unlike with the Opportunity berries, which seem to do an excellent job of carrying their most important truths in their images all by themselves. Still, the descending spot is a fun anomaly to consider. Personally, I like the "alien press" explanation. The press is everywhere, so if other intelligent life exists, why would their press not be at Gusev taking historic photos and writing articles? 8^) Since we are visiting new planets it can not be long before we have to endure cultural assimilation. 8^) Hope you feel better soon Terry! --============_-1132807068==_============ Content-Type: image/jpeg; name="jumpsite.JPG" ; x-mac-type="4A504547" ; x-mac-creator="4A565752" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="jumpsite.JPG" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 /9j/4AAQSkZJRgABAQEASABIAAD//gAXQ3JlYXRlZCB3aXRoIFRoZSBHSU1Q/9sAQwAB AQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEB AQEBAQEBAQEBAQEB/8AACwgATQC+AQEiAP/EAB0AAAMAAwEBAQEAAAAAAAAAAAQFBgMH CAIBCQD/xAAxEAACAgIBBAICAQMDBAMBAAABAgMEBRESAAYTISIxFEEyFSNRB0JhFiQz UiVDgdH/2gAIAQEAAD8A5BS5LmUFKSu8UrALJJAqQ+mA+bmIgnZBP+dk62AeicR23FVt tDbtixSKrIqyGR3SSRiXJdyf4gBdeve/vphjsNkbk0z373iqwSP+NBXEkDzorlI0V0PH l4wG5HR9En/PTk1LUdTJC9ZjqlausY0wZpBIJFAZmUsW/tAHiNfZb2RrpbTtZFMNwy+Y 88osWSRFJNHF+NyXw6jLsFPAgMdbYE/+vsqo1LFRC9Rxd6a7/ITy2Emrt7LKPE49j3vX 7J0DsaL/AAcM1KK1mczfrTCaMmClSSSpLE4cSBpPfjbkjFBxOuQ2fvRKq2rOa8sq5Pw1 YuQhpxvMlgsH4kvIhCuHB2i7/kNn97f9v4tK2Sgv5vzWJ0dTChlI8ka8hGCjmQM3A7LE +/v1rRsVwkyWLL2clXxdK+pWF2SSOCuCfIZLKwnUqlSBpVJ5ab366lMp3HJjb8eBr5Wh foRcZpc0sROOPnGnhaGQ+QvXKgOSPewF3oHpt3VnbmJw0aY+shilhEpSrFFELLSxo7NG AVAMhAcFwDxGj+t3D5zEzdt4q5hK8lnOvoTwzSR2kqsIIxyngcBGUyFk0G9nXIlfttFX mxXaz9ww4uplM5cexBaarSrrHFBEUkhCwyAqkqMzK0iMeZ9b+OxMY6fNVcxF3Djsjjf6 NCI5MjichUN6aR03+TEjS7gj1OwUKVIUKF9/ZDwfemSy2SzFWrilxx4loRDBXgFiR7L7 VPB412RtwhABHrYOui6diODLWI+4stSp25Yo+FG/G8jEMxdSo1LGDIuyD9EDWwR0YrXs gy4+Gu8OMErFfAFhlslmKt4Jk0QGHFxsaCk+97ARt3OO35rFe3UWQL8WNtI5WiTk3F5T IG2CBran3v7117js0+4oxesXKn4nJlg4RlFilX1JvS8fXrYQD3++tiYWjhbVVMa2Wo38 s4P4ZoK8MqlvUKMxHN2SMFT8x73716KqPJRwXpMPmZbmPldjDVV7UiPYfkdLGyFiC0S8 xyOlG/3vou1BPgTNDXxtyJriIZJXdDJZhk28Y57DMD/NfIx+z6HodBVe3s/moiyQy0Kq u7xQFWVmc6DykxOoPPez+zsE7Pvrja7BXs34KmfgsdsR+CCZLU8ohSUSxqVINcMx2hEm yD97Gj0Lc7lr1rkcAhknxsQRHaN1WWaJVKiUTN8v7vFXBYbAb3v2Cvyv+oHbFvJ4q1cy C41MbIj/AI4naIyKIfEBIIVKSEgBmLj5HZ19dJ87/qnAcg9nA05spVaCKIKrxToCg27I JQFBPL9DehrZ9nqfwX+p1OnZatm1TjZkYimxRZyHbycEcq4U6Oh+gAVAI31TRd/VsrKx rhsf+GecMVh1dZQ20VSsYCsCpDDY4kgbHI762f2rnxmwkd7hNYVuMcEKrGCAQE5D2pVg N7I+RB2dgdXFHtqz3DlIzjInqyIyKoUbg5IChDxx8VffssST/nf307w+IsLmjjL80ktx CBE6GRUQl3ALoTyZQFKgDXr3sEe8fcuUzvaGTlqCSu6zQQkz264sV/G3zVUSUni6j+bD Rb6HxAAZ1aOY7kwT2L8WO/oEHklsvVx8Ve0ysVSUJbUcl2wHAa0oOvvZ6l8Ni5aV6S5H j8nUqKdVLGZsfn07DI7KY4YWJUFU07DioCFR9aHW32VLuLiszz0q0/JohTrQLVkkWNQE dPGqp8x8l5HZHs/odA5PuXLYlocfLWarTmRAomjT2GUt5NhyCGADbYEkHZOj6kO5ljx0 uMsWquQr/wBSm8deaGz4aYkMXldpa67Eq6OyNDe97XQ6M7ViyT9wT4+jEEnStWsRXniD 15DYc8YwhKuTH/v2dH9Bip6zZexgc3jLknd6SVe4YJbNaAV5hSaVK7mGsVSJWJLIrMNs P0fv7d0OzIKfbk+ap3L+RsRQmStXrXrCvFxMfEOH4qwKto60CdkjY11E4O7g8lHcjzlK 7WuSSSwMLVoEuiSnhoAOD69jkx9D39e1diahjcFffGVrcccUlqQwy2BK78pRsqx4qoYE MoI9L/LRBBru2s6Bjklmngo3p1CUYXTVq3KNMI4HiP8AMIGYHkPQI2AdG8iwtbIfjyZP G5HF31byrkMjYEteRWX4NDEvKRWK7bltfi316109tp3O1MVUoyWqg2ovGKNiE1of3Wby gBQuhvXH1sdB9tZHwmxWzWZhhMezHEvlidGL6Ic/IHS/HXr2Nj0evzVzmZJqG5mcpDes SbeGpAZYpoY2G0jPPkm0RvHtWC+idcR1q+fuW7FHZVQzrMpVI/TSqgfYKsToHiAAR716 H+AmGK7hq49+4rqxy4uw8ka1XgDWVMJDM/lf4aYOoX/H7+/S/H35oZgYW/GqOxaRpvlw LEltMD69kAnRCjY9/XUlnJqmRne3BeWO7SImrEySFJnBKBOAIB9bbRIBI1rf3sn/AE0z M5kWbuTC3ctArBYo8bJHSkfgw0XkbnzBX/I9H3r3o9VdvZihLYhudv4u3jbSlF3flitx xiLaqZI0ChvZ0f0Tv0f93RnYVvufuHH5qSJqVK1Tqh1vrTRYK5/I4LNNHCVZlOyNr7Gy 3r31iwNGlUt2b+fsyXFeaWKTN1JpK9F5I5SXhjVtyrLA2xId60VA/etvVcF2R3BWFK35 qZkQFcjkbfniCuBxfkEdyutEKG1ptDWwOo5Zo3yMuJpZXH2cbjiRJFUgdFliBaLTAAK2 +Cli66Lb5AkDoS5jO3qV+HIS3JbsjuqrUgsSJDAyDe3ryAx/IEq+hsaG/RG3gwf/AM9B nMJjchZs+CqpDTCxjx41PE/iOwiDfIhiNFtj36JOTuPtHFZ69QsZvICrArD+owpNNXdY xHphEYwREQ+vYDBQNDe/UfNje3zkpsfhhdGIrRRn+pZa62QrrIecUormRS8TqwGyANoQ oJ3rr+gvxXIxje245MhAkrrav05NTKzHTqLJ8cyKkg0icvjviAde6m23a2BhqLeozZa1 ZYCZFmjM8JaNW5SPOh9luSnRJ2OR9b1Pw9v4vuC8WTKXIKJIJxte9ZhkgBGmaXxkRlW9 oBx0rLyK/Wg8x2riP6nXqYbIxZbCxeM2pKbyGzBMUIsxzWpFVy0cukJ0dNsD/PVhkMDg 8bVqVc2FgxdxREWYmOTxmMOdTlWbkVAJPHYPsje9x+SgxyWo1hRa+EpcHpWZtSMZSvCU rMF5khCutqAo3o79Cmg7lpNTWTH1ruSu1yVV1seWAcAEUeKQgAD2DrXIHWifuhwmdr4W xDJZNmwbcm56ZslinIGUhElJRfkSBrQ/X1oADJ4iTuTITT15ocbGFV1SWNgxVmbQ5Q6B GiCN/Y9g/fXA2TxdW4ly5HSOTmn5MDTEaQ1gW5h2iZdELsLpf0QND96OtYjKYuW4Lggk iuhoBAsHGaBQ5kBDsSFPEhNro+mHsE9JYu287WheqmVD42R3sGjP55bAac85AkjuVXY0 AANADQOtdeJcDShpTVpGmju2ecdaJp2LO5KseKj0fjsqNg8fv1o9J2wT15IIcxTbxwny iOFVgnaN10paQKxKMoBUnfvZ62d/p7W7ffuirdN8Y+tGa8ckVqaSSICEFTtEUoGOxybi dkksDoddq4TFdqQTVI8cxydS5Iv5T1JeL6YGRwjyRqUIfWgPQAH/ACTtqHub/pdXoVu3 rhxtuNYwiNXEx3p2aewRuWNtKAh2FI37P09xWLgtSR2/yKc9dyswoiEFUdxtlkUjxtIA eLuASzKdtx46tIO0s3YxORqx2qd97MbrWgp1DDYrhphJGDISvsJ8dL+9kfsdA0O2D27V le/hrNu8qsyisUiZBy2rThiTImthQWPy9kfvpF21XyVm1b7koY5M1WqSyRvjYK0Tyoa8 rRshMx8XkBYISP8Acp2zDXRWTp/6myxTWr9CPtzBSFn8M1CKG5LHy20cFqrKTG4BR1Og Aux696Eu5C/Bia8MIr32llliFYV1e2pCBg8k0mwyuRpF2CN7+/YzdsjM08zDhc5i4MdV ueKWOa1TrlSloGUFioZmTgF1sf5/yel+fvjE5M1nipR4kyN+VboV46ggjYuxnlkjVZCr nh74sSxDaPRdLKUpKxlwqV+4qth2iaaGKOZ6xQKz8pbADLxPwPEA72B6PoJZMNg80GOR pwNOsTSLIpKQswMjK4462pOm0D8gTvio6+ZTtCTPQzXu2puU4DMPxvIsDOTsu8acAyMx 5aJJJ96+j0k7lpZDCYfHqlW3kczFNI07yuJ60UYiUR7qzsQoDFlYr60FOgBvqDm7egzd qHL59rqyKEXjSsvSooIl4hZKqExEgHjJofM/LR1o76oyQS9mZLH4OGpdnNRokFatD+Up 5RnXnIRiw0VL8gS2z76kK9rM4ujD/UO1MmI5Z5I2tTGsQgGnLciWcAD1oHYB9/8ADqXM 1RFDVqZbH1wiiZ2mR3k5SD3CzgKxMZ2uiSo47X764mymKS7UrUaTPRlqO0slh5GEcpdB GYyIuLNxcEnnsAnY2Tsgt2xnLq+e7ksLJiK6hZUXGsLI8Y4P/wBzwJ236fXok737J1ym K7ZyF64bi5CBqSk1yl4xpZeOQx8I1RCAQu302lA16G9dRGTxkGWyEcFKhfgai4kVpbAd mUgxodro6IPIb4/YG9+yJDgMhlM5HaawK+NjWGvPYsK7xp4AYpSzKSTptBiFJAPreh1Z 4rtimth2xWYx94QgvOsEUzN/IqeJdF0Q2gSN/wCPQA6qqGUynat0T1qWQkL8FilaXlXR wCxZoncfHidev/4p6R7Dtd1905rHx914u7kMPMIONjFrHQ4oyNsPIZCWKJxDNx/n7Gye ut6/dmPrcaVXFR1MzDHHDiI5468geWNfHEZ4lQrYDxrtizAuxLA70evOZ7psX1THRXau M7ghCy2SsPijkglULCkUMOijBgzFi2mHxI+j1BVc5lsZlHmx80t3M2FSImyzW6bBGJjY VJXKjkeXL9kcQfQJZo+Sq0aluxYq3nyXzmlTGWvwK/kkbbF6qcUIZi3IcvbD3sjrFW7z XGYyzkMvdep5leOlWy0z2kZ0YMVWNjIhYxsGbagEa2CB7WZnInu/sMSXpoJL8N2/JFSw 8Yxt6SufGsBEsPH/AMiElCSD6J9EkdFyd49t9wyYbHx47LU8fj4a0GYyFi+ry1Ioa6wS O9hB5kIlQKSoJHIgEEneSz21jpbla12mLOfx5f8A7pmsveThwPIP+QVACMFX2GH70Tod E5mfMVZIqHb1Kt8o4/LBBShDoxQFthTGA3kU822dsPeyTpHlc9hGsUsLcnoUxbZI78lq FHsKzRbmKTLGZIuMiEDixK/w+iS2Tu5sPPiqtMZ5K2OjJKvjrE9GxKDGqt/fg4Mf8/IH /j2epnt/hZqvRwNDMEAuoy2Vu/1GqW5aO1kbzaDfIj64toD49IpxnZ4r1iyIsg+PD7rY +AVviknjDGMtxLEfZYeyNn2N9Z8HHn1KnE1bivI3KzW583Eb/Nf/ALVUJyP72T/Eg62b +hlsRDI9fOQ5FJ3WNZBLcPhi+XtvCeYB0CGK6J+mAPT2v29gmgEmJrS5yOWSSQtWlV2h 5nkVd50BPBjw0PSkaXa/XEuWo5C7YgxUNOzH5yjCyrBRxmTajasrnagEn6Pr0QW05nx2 FTG/0mUX44pU4W4BcdJ5mIXyCCUf+Isy8l3tgoA/fuCuf6eY+uvnwr2aLuxCjJ2JLm9E MDpQo/fLfvf+dHXSo9l5oTLHNXImdFP5yRcImjYEqoAPk9DbEH38tj166WZDBSWZEoS3 a1YqQrCOOSL9cTzCD5EheRJ2WJLH37FLgO1beOWb8e1Rq80VY71isXruxYMVIX5My/yJ O/sHe/vZ3bVs4qKWPP1KOQjYsEvR04VhA5b0glRmDKPRbXvY/QO9t4ivBgslQ7kiytfC QCRJoa2R8s0M5EbMBHDGDDrThgCgGgPsfb23nO2MFdi7it3TEMjMUOQsWWapI6bkdKkT KfCycx7XR4aUfXrPke/sbVuG9QnpWa89aAcvCjzsePIt5nUEcuW0BJABOt6J6kMzkIsj Vlt3ZJsXHrmMgJmhWEMQRIzQfPgoYbA97I9bJPQmB7ttRVb+Pe3Vt0rcTQUbphDmSYSg svlkPkkKxgHR+vRGwd9XGKvUqPbrVMtLSt5cy2Z69OWFJJTFKwauUSVXX5R8iCCB8T9D W2WJvWIm/OymQxFOyuvwKH4XiUhT/bWSJQYpdxEFwSORGyP83Pc+OsHB1clUjxtmSfn5 EoUo4V141blMqqgkRifo+idFxsjUrge3VygWarlGxWU8jCQeadaXFWHBGqQME2PkJCTp tA+9dZ4Is92hnYMl3C6ZGrFIHNmpEa8PhUMFLiRiXIU+9gltg+gd9D/1qlkTnMr3eMTY o/jn+hQ4+lDRtCwJztZbPB/Oxrkejr5/P1vZjbIwWXw7GnUt1MsZ7CxJbsrPH4l4iCTw qutSKST72fog+wJtcZHgkabIdwRWcjovWq42WzTji+Q8azQ7EbsELK+vixUv9fRDZOnj qkjQ0MhWsXFZWt2rKzVWJAk2YPZALEkggNpj9HQAOHzUlbJkm+sEjcGktNzFZk+fCNI9 7Vl98mJG/QGt7FtWhqZbIKblG3BDIE3eaYCu2wRzAXkxX6YKAfRH/qerzGm/KXp5Nf6F i66qcfddPFHdk3wdUasS7nxgSEuoXRDAknrj5+9u2qvbt/F3bSVcrLA4r5GWX4LKzKVK BUaVV4AlAG2Aw9jXtTg8ilxI1r/3ZYn8v9Sm1LUcNoAeN/mCp3vezpgNevduLWEsSGkl yvmO4J0VIaNANCsZIBi3BInjJ4q6khgWO9da3TtbJNJcrS55TPLJK7xBrIkpq8u1DguQ Cn/jIjJ0QQD6OqB+0cNjsNOJLq2rcsbRvJ5JS2wytqNpF5IeQOjsgbIP/CPBUIa0C1p7 b1oFtSyM9uSSULG7ejv2daPoD6/wOtup3biO3zUp9l41cpacRmxZviDJ1FlKh3ZYLCKF jE/LS+9bC+wOs2D7iSazl6+eSOxZsVl/sxoiRwiSXmBBGwdYWA+G4wPQA0B6MHms5f8A KmJx2KmlRbDyRQ2lhsgGXl8lWTfEEAFdEbQD2dHWCXLQTX6Ed+/VERMcdmCBPC8AWPRB 4gqpDDiFUH96++pCl3vkqWYyuFqqJcTZhVOdtVtLxeUsxR5WJT/aR69AD66re3P+nUvM cwuRleTi0bU771q8TMxbfi0daG1PHX6/Q0Ni4WpJep5K9kslWgoVlYxSTJL50gSbxxgz AOwITjth+iT9nYtcbKljFWrP9Wx81KrHuDlE7SuyMqELM6/y461yA0N62G9bM7Gsxdw9 tvUx9plyD2bEEsdh3nURJKvjZIgQIyx5aO9lfsfZ6nseq9u5RsWGkalLO7XLDOztEZJH eVlkO2Qc10oU/BSVAAAIQZ//AFe7VQ28dmcbk68VdSlS7YvRmC9LsoyRAqzjii+Rg448 W9ez0nh7msdxYtmwGHltsDIscQWvKEUFQjspCrpwTs6LHR199S+QSxkOzM7Za1HQt4+O yxHFopVkWdIuKyRa4lSGAHIgaP8AgdR2L7itph1bM4PIzhAyUcgksKxSTIADstzkkATR 0ToctkgqOq3t29SxuOk7hupI89h5oY6NuQS8VgcOrLHIGhXkjAegCdAH0CDsTD42Wfwm JKdyxdby1qsVZPK3lHkjReYA3x+OwQoCkqRsdE18kMrdtY3xiG7jI1ksVYwqtEpfwhpV iAUqXVgP5eySR692+LxEUtcW6KW+4LTs0NirXsSSLUSMjUninPCPbloyyHZIAP7A/NbD 5PBNamp2dXhDGpaPfKXRYqWV5FJBOvRG9fX0Tu6xhqGJ8tjJlSupaE4ksXs8oSA7lwoh KyFgQCNjR5D1y6LyXdEeNyuOgxZqOtlohZdIkNuB2i5uTYZVcMkm1Gj8Tv7G9WtOx289 ew2RyMdWzPFtZHldTyYhyW4I3P7J19+9g9JbAxjxlbeVgs42NmdHrNNC7EkckaUjbaHr RH2AdDfS9Mg95WFeiyRQDUcziJowqHgskqj5OGXRPokkj0CRobOS914KnFPibeMNTIs0 Ns/04vMI0AlIgmbi0Lh/RI0dEfsnqMv9xJNFSx1LG5eLOLM8s+QNxGrSrKmo18S8ZNIw duJYqAQF0FJ6pe4srmZIq9q1CaAiq11ktmMRovji4BiYiXBGtlgCST7PvZ+2e3cpksRV yc7rBUlaRIMiI2SDyRooLSFCJH0vEkAb2wOj99E4rEpRiEtrGWs/CrcmyWMZIIVIAHBz Lt/gfTe/5NsegT1a34sJJSVGglhnkjCx01lCXZSwVgiSINBx71s+vkQQSB0n7ExKfmZR MpYuVKyxbgq2bcxHymYBpF5Mjgpx9FfveyPW9wUKEeWoR1sFDPYs1pZS0kcnKqYzpEEk HxDDkPeyQxK+tjYrcVkJ4omL1ZpXrbS1cxZWlXrCI+ImeNSrMysAjsuy0g5E76+XKOPx 96l3Hk8g0uLilEtqgk0qWbaohLRJK4KCRiyvtxrW9Aj30uzGR7T7tum8mGang4oY44ad j8V7n5EXKOew1hI+LJKvEqNbUbJOyOpX/qWzh8Pdk7cofjw1WsNJceOKSGKNZAqiRQI2 JU638SNkaGvXUv8A1O/PYoZjufHWKmIexuQRhasGVCRkvFEqF0Z2DLIxlT2D9b0evj3s HPnxcoUrwrCKBYcbNaWZRIoId1QjwgS+j6XZA2fYANHfymWj7jxy2sZBiIrAqrXpX6sD /kgRMQY0jHjDSp/c5soLKPn7A6o8e/bZtyirmpMHlF+csl+5PNCGPIgxQwgNEOYbiFI1 HxUaBHSrK5PO9rLLbx2WwuRq3iYrVmPHl52RCZNtNMFk/kQfskcjrWz1Vdp9x7qt/TTb /JcGW1LFP/afyEHiqsV48X362R61+uuL8Z21VixkGdzRSvZLHmqoYFaKNUMe1Ue9ht+z 8t7/AOOnlbM1snYTG4jG2JY9KjSwtEFDHQLsF4trkvs65Hf7+y6xfdYxD38bU7c3b8IB sXq9O2ebPvcRlTnEwK75AgkHQ+xv1CcT3L5qudimrWxyaL8aUUxGzvoM6RKQy69aA17J 0B6ZXLZXC4K7iLdZsxFI1gx2KZSFoI5HUxiSSXlIxVVCsQASw+ta6mExPcXPH2cdK9bG y2CslOcPJYnQx8iiyc+HtuLKSNAKPve+rTM2q9JadXOVrkESIkqobCxn5x75etjTL8h6 B0SN76Lp9tw3LUPctF46c0CxiD8oNNAVhGo2eIKFfaMObNrf8iCQB0DYy2KWd8d4JssJ CRlBBKvFYy29xCVSYSJRoaDEfxB0BonPdnYC/gocvbuZerhUeRIKUWVsRMJ4kUTAFAYz 8SvxCgDWve+qitTtYntcYbDHwzXI3kope/7qeUTiN4yHYgsGjHIewTv9n10TWwV3OVWq 4iGTL56tEsl1KgO6S6EaSSI5XSmRXQNHITsAbGjsH8vIs0XbpxNnGZCtKz2c5Z8Zoski 8VhMMYM4auyHmWJDctADQ1tXEStjLdSnPYjFGZYPychX5V4QXTk7sw+elcfsE6Y7+yes Pa75UZDN1rkE2MwMgcw2rhDrk2aw3kirSo7OrFOEoMigBPv31sHEVO2rUs8OXlkrV40D VpLdhjDNIzEFVXTjWtOdgb2fvpPflt0qtmObAz1capl45QpXSoIOekl0u3O04HZAPyGg G2BMwUcMYisNtJorJYlY3kMMjE82RoyvEqP93JTs+zvXuVz9sSzrjs3mcXDTrqpxUSQS Q+Kd103kKhllHhCjRA02yPSkjBRsXI6X9Gu1YLGQllkalmateOCtFXmKtV8kevPIUiUc mBUszD6G9Ju+3luZDB23zEMU2PeFZWLS/wAIqwiAHEjjog79j360d66dwYZsjRaeDI1a sTxqklyzHJIH0ATwZSWUg7J/fvQ9nRf9v4mjYxr42tm6d6byTAhxPMFZ2AJ4zDYBKkAA AA/Q9dHdu1s9Zs3aoaCNKo0r163i5jyFBsoRy9KD96//AHfXD2NZopTNYms2jzPGI2ZE gVQeQXwt5UOhpd6G9bI/XRcObyF660NN4cbHWUOfHCsjyfIoQXjNYgHQPsN/j/nqgx/c uXly8NNpKnGPxlpDTRpH3tSC3INr1v8AkSD+/XVdJdt5TNQNbaBYohDGYqtdarOI1KbM qMT8t8jtW+Xsk76POOxlTH5JooLTPNHJtprzyheUgclVaLQI5aGtaA+vfUNeu5KHHKK9 wRqJZUjDReRo+BXRDmRSTogfr0NfR6cTQzU6UFmSwblmRA3ktIZkXlGH0I5ZJRpT6X5A AegNdU1CErPTsrLKHXhIYxI4rsCm+HgDcFAJ/XTTunKmSnSQ0qMStJIrNVrRVpn0g35Z 405yAldgHXFiSCT1ZYeYYOekXhhyVJ68E/4NuNWiDvEsjH+4Jo9nYUt4dkDZ2T61pju5 8lj87kshIYrcayStXqsgRK4WduKIzCVeKowTSxIOI1r6AqUy1ys5y+OkNCbIf2bKREkP HGRMFDJ4tAu+/atr3/n0xwDL3D3XTxFwOkVowiWWOQ828isW/QP8tkfP1sjfWxu3MFUi 7lXG2HntU2sGIxvK4crycH+4WcgnS++O/Wh037zMVPI/hVo3jgqwwSwr5SdPIpQ8tKOa 6RdqfR1+vvoHtbKy5BzWyEUdiMOyoUVYXUcjrTBH9gDROhv79fXSzunuGSJJsfWhlSq5 4yRz22tclLHYUvEgT2o1oHSgL+t9aYzeYydVqi4+ytSOew0UyNF5+S8CfgS8fjbkNllG 9aA1rfXutP8AjZaOdVEzvFEzi3q0vMJyLIsoIj5H9Deh696HTvtzINncxNQuIywCTgxg l8UnEysmkdUBj0B61vQ9DpRfxTTdx2KIskVqkaTxJJF5XLOWBDSNICw0f2Pv5a966paC 1b+PY247JaB5IV/HuyVoyI24KWjWNgf479kknWydDrYXb9OhWrM8Fd0lMQdJPNsq3o7b +2C5Ove2Gz8iN66f2Gp1I0YVpjM7fOWK48AZWUPoosTbIJ/kWO/8df/Z --============_-1132807068==_============ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Regards, Horace Heffner --============_-1132807068==_============-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 14 18:38:31 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2F2cR5L031949; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 18:38:27 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2F2cQl4031933; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 18:38:26 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 18:38:26 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f From: Standing Bear To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: MARS Spirit .. CD Rock? Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 20:31:00 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200403142031.00374.rockcast earthlink.net> Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53562 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: On Wednesday 10 March 2004 09:59, Horace Heffner wrote: > At 1:03 AM 3/10/4, Don Wiegel wrote: > >A "VERY VERY" Round rock? Is being shown in some of the latest Photos. > > > > > >Panoramic Camera :: Sol 065 > > > >http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/p/065/2P132133848ESF1500P25 > >34R2M1.JPG > > > > > >http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/p/065/2P132133713ESF1500P25 > >34L4M1.JPG > > > > > >Microscopic Imager: > > > >http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/m/065/2M132132493EFF1500P29 > >58M2M1.JPG > > That may actually be an impression in the "soil" and not a disk. It looks > like the front end of a spectrometer was pushed into the ground there. > Note that the shadow at the top goes the wrong direction for the thing to > be a disk. Compare to the rock shadows. > > The thing I find most interesting is that the soil has a crust that looks > like crustose lichen, like some of the soil at the Opportunity site. It > also compresses like lichen, showing the white flat compressed frost-like > mottled surface like the Opportunity photos. > > Regards, > > Horace Heffner tried your links Horace. Seems that NASA has jerked the pix from the net. so much for openness. Standing Bear From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 14 19:13:29 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2F3DJLh010408; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 19:13:20 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2F3DJWh010395; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 19:13:19 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 19:13:19 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <40551FCD.7080603 rtpatlanta.com> Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 22:15:25 -0500 From: Terry Blanton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Jumping dot anomaly in Mars photos References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <4JJSl.A.XiC.O9RVAB ultra5.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53563 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Horace Heffner wrote: >BTW, "Short Circuit" has to be one of my most favorite movies, and "Short >Circuit II" one of my greatest movie going disappointments. > Agreed. Also, the sequel lacked Alley Sheedy. >The dark blotch to the left shows the crater at the top of >the hill. > Maybe it's not a crater? Maybe there is a remnant of volcanic activity? Spewing an occasional boulder? There is still that Mars Express image which seems to show such. >Since the object is to the east of Spirit, it can not be a setting star or >other astronomical object. > Considering that Mars Sol is longer than our day, that's a long way to move in 36 seconds. >One thing very strange about the region clipped in the photo is that it is >very different from the surrounding surface (which unfortunately is not in >the clip due to size.). The area just behind the crater has a very angular >structured look. Also noteworth is that there is a fairly large object in >the left (west) side of the crater. > Have you noticed the caves on the hillsides? Well, they could be caves. This plain is boring, let's head for the hills. Only 25% or so of scheduled life left in Spirit. >Since we are visiting >new planets it can not be long before we have to endure cultural >assimilation. 8^) > Resistance is futile. Actually, the press did cover the "crash". But long range photos indicated it was just a balloon, or a group of balloons. >Hope you feel better soon Terry! > Thanks. Weather was great here and I slept through it. :-( Felt good enough to change the oil on the Echo today. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 14 20:00:01 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2F3xpLh022090; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 19:59:51 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2F3xmk2022055; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 19:59:48 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 19:59:48 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 19:05:28 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: MARS Spirit .. CD Rock? Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53564 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 8:31 PM 3/14/4, Standing Bear wrote: >On Wednesday 10 March 2004 09:59, Horace Heffner wrote: >> At 1:03 AM 3/10/4, Don Wiegel wrote: >> >A "VERY VERY" Round rock? Is being shown in some of the latest Photos. >> > >> > >> >Panoramic Camera :: Sol 065 >> > >> >http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/p/065/2P132133848ESF1500P25 >> >34R2M1.JPG >> > >> > >> >http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/p/065/2P132133713ESF1500P25 >> >34L4M1.JPG >> > >> > >> >Microscopic Imager: >> > >> >http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/m/065/2M132132493EFF1500P29 >> >58M2M1.JPG >> >> That may actually be an impression in the "soil" and not a disk. It looks >> like the front end of a spectrometer was pushed into the ground there. >> Note that the shadow at the top goes the wrong direction for the thing to >> be a disk. Compare to the rock shadows. >> >> The thing I find most interesting is that the soil has a crust that looks >> like crustose lichen, like some of the soil at the Opportunity site. It >> also compresses like lichen, showing the white flat compressed frost-like >> mottled surface like the Opportunity photos. >> >> Regards, >> >> Horace Heffner > >tried your links Horace. Seems that NASA has jerked the pix from the net. >so much for openness. > >Standing Bear As far as I can see they are still there. For some reason the vortex list server truncates my long lines, but not some other folks. Not sure why, but might be due to HTML vs TXT processing by the list server. The URL's above are broken into two parts. You have to open a browser window and then cut the last part of the URL and paste in the URL window and then cut and paste the first part onto the front (or vice versa) before hitting enter on the browser. For example, the last characters on the last URL above are not: "93EFF1500P29". The last characters are: "93EFF1500P2958M2M1.JPG". Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 14 20:49:52 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2F4njLh005229; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 20:49:46 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2F4niD6005217; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 20:49:44 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 20:49:44 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="============_-1132795989==_============" Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 19:55:07 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Jumping dot anomaly: surprising data Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53565 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: --============_-1132795989==_============ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" I have made an estimate regarding the size of the crater in front of the jumping (slowly descending) dot using Mars Global Surveyor scaling information. The crater itself is only about 30 meters wide from far (north) edge of the crater berm to the far (south) edge of the crater berm. Assuming the dot is above the ground immediately behind the crater it is only about 1.5 meters off the ground. The dot is small, about the size of a head, or a pancam assembly! 8^)) Can it talk? Is it Number 5 asking for INNNFORRRMAAAATION? Only a rover equipped with a microphone could tell for sure! 8^)) The originally posted information follows: If you carefully align the following Spirit panoramic Sol 68 photos, especially the little crater on top of the hill, and jump back and forth between the two photos (using alt tab), you will see a little dot in the air just above the little crater that jumps up and down a few pixels. An illusion? In the first photo, the coordinates of the jumping spot are 379,424. A clip of the small crater and spot are attached. --============_-1132795989==_============ Content-Type: image/jpeg; name="jump.JPG" ; x-mac-type="4A504547" ; x-mac-creator="4A565752" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="jump.JPG" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 /9j/4AAQSkZJRgABAQEASABIAAD//gAXQ3JlYXRlZCB3aXRoIFRoZSBHSU1Q/9sAQwAB AQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEB AQEBAQEBAQEBAQEB/8AACwgAYACaAQEiAP/EAB0AAAICAwEBAQAAAAAAAAAAAAUGBAcC AwgBAAr/xAA7EAACAQMCBQIDBgUDBAMBAAABAgMEBRESIQAGEzFBByIUUWEIFSMycYEk M0KRoQnR4WKxwfAWQ1Lx/9oACAEBAAA/AP2ycvWw8vLJJXxSEnsAwT+rPnPccL9VPQXC 7SdJJKYnTh5ZA6v7m2UAZz5Oe3bifC93t1SvwZjkjfGT0Q2xye7MPPf5fPiLWU99qJ5J qGWATOq/Fo9OXPTBJXABAU6ydxnI2xxEjKwyaa1WNT2LKQi6vPs3I89+3nbgiUv0MkD2 ukes+Jfp6YolYxDGoMxZgCD2GN8+OMYYPgbok3M9luLyMEMZgmjpgrDLDIy2r25B+u+3 Au9w1MVxauSgqaa21KRxUvWKOzSoCXBkU4PsIOMDHjjfTVFw6f4ShcjuyBtvn3H04l0z XKaoVhPAJYWDxgwn3NuMYBwdv0HnfiNeK5auqjg5lIjiUKFaP8DUNOBgrrP5R9D5PA9j RUEsQsrlI6giN1mYztUqFLdKBiBocHDFmA9u23lqSmoEpVlqpPuKcjIkuLmRJSQMFEiD YByWHyHc7cAZaGpq3PXhY0CEMlwX209RnIKRblwyjDHI7MMb8a6SegppU5fSkqXSkkNw eUTLpHxeRk5AbAK/LHE2e2W5SbdWwVE0UOK2mWGYRuJKrdtTEHWunsNsHJGw4IW8xwEQ U9srQuTgvKjZ7gd9/wD39uC9RdrnSmnCWWsqo0kJKwmIFQV7lmYZHYf8cKfNU019EaJy 5deqMDSJoTg6cHOk/r5/bgQnL1+CIByxdcBVA90XYAY/r+XDbFaHrcueYKaVRtgfE742 8nYf+fHEaai5fpm6VddKcTZxCY5JYmMmOx9mWGAds7fPxwChq4aOvwa4SQErpJdzsdRB ye/tI3Pbtx9LBR19w1RXoU35Dp6tQOqd/ZiPA274Ox/xwXuVNXUNMjRQGpTAInCK2RpG +pzq+Xn5d9+A0dXVyoNDVDMhy6U8rRtAO2piGGxOQMeT2HG74nmKn/iKSwXW9ou5ZZI5 QgA33qJMjGdP/GeJNveqv0s2mjq6erpEEtTR1Egk6EbMUVhGrGNPd7Sykk6cbjvulu1v pW+FrJUp3GRudJB7dwCRjH9gPPGBg5czHUm9pHLIxECfEzjXJgkqAFwdidj47HsBKpLJ FXVay1rmohXSYiC3uAzp3bOr2nIJA4wuX3vJK9FSUMVPRQoG6klNE8s4OVMdNKvujkGl W1nHtzvvwBgoqmmmLU7y0kxPu++WevhY5P8ALiZmVRnJUbAJhfHByNqmRlpapJBVV34F LLGenSTygaunBTg+1woLN2yuBwToq7mCjrhRvy40j3QJb4qg0tKf5WXDamJfYKdwc79+ 44yuslXJWRPRpH8dTaTcIXjWTRTquiPKbKv4gIyDjbGOAMd5vN5uqUFFLTRSBkVsUwG+ 6nZCCNwTnPG24QXShrGgu9cCnTQosHUgZWIySTqOoaQBjwR9ciHJUWZCqxV0/wAQcYX4 uUnJz4IG/fscbnftxIFLfGAZJ6rQwBT8WU+07rv1N9sb8RFt8lTC1/qao9SnzimpXkgR ul7PdGp6Tag2d/IyfHGFPSVdzcVouNtt6yHoqldSNM0nSJ2iKZVZCNy3fGRv5LSU0VsC yV0CzoME1SKqw4xnVpYEhRntjyOCMPNfKFHC2au21lRMDGtNDGiz0zDfW7NFgg7oNJ7/ AEI4UrlXtXOZIzULTEn8spChcHtg4xjG2kfpwPWroqBXlozLNOwxNGZS2V7j2tsPd5yS e2+2W7l+WpvCMZ6kW2nH5+oXXUM47xHue+SM98ZPGFbXcvUsz0trlqJK9R/Gzx1bFZYi ToXTpVgA4J3JHj68Cmo0qPxRCZCTnLgOT+5Hb6ed+OZk+1ry9BbWvnKvpd62832dJ6mn W7cs+iXNXNlrrko66S2zz2evtdFVUldDHWwzRPUUcsqAQy62AifTso/tSWbm2ZRF6Pfa dt86xySvLXehHP1ht6CFRqVqutoaalEhYhY4Vcyu35UIVmBFPtWegBiFDzZznc+Qb7ar lU0dx5b58tPMvKPMdJNCkbxvNbbnbIpJ6GtpJ6a4W240j1VuuFFVQ1FLVSgvoZuVftI/ Zs5z5tsXJ1g9U7Dd+ZOYqirpLHZoLrUJXXart9ouV+raagjqKeIVE9NZbPdLrLDGxkWi t9ZUaenBIy3ff6XlcwRy0slwqqiA9RVprjIjwsUADjIXSTkrlSCDnxnjTy/DdK2FmpaC 7ukTMY5ZKoysh1BdSsX1K2MDOx349vEQWJPiRVUdZE7NGzTsjVMhGOk2gkyBRl9LtgHJ HbgVapuYKiQiejFPCDhKmOCOGQgEgN1UbWcjByTnJJ7nHE2rmvcL4S11V1i2DFBG7xjH 53eVslewAGSDnuOI8U7SsGamit84PaqijkKkHsQg8H5H99+Da3C+hQBdrMAAAAaFsgAY APu8DiG5s1Iwj5XrxeFbaWFJpKkKDvnEwVRlhjbuRj68QJqa1ljLUCrnqlGv4SlqTB8K xz+LKmNBR8lAF3yNz248jhulwUqJkakUYNO6l5ioIAXqasZxjxjbfvwBnqOWaWoWCS11 tFVxtmSpqKmNoagnI0RIqalYEFzqJypxvjibXc00dPEkMUCmHGMkR9tI31ac+Pr+vGhr jbnigmooxLWTOVEWVbUQoIUIV0nO/c/TIxxM6NI4WXm24f8Ax6DvGDJJSawQCN6bUCDG QxJH1744NxV9kaJIrVB8RTR7pcCySioyACokZRIxXZvfsM7b8fG6VAHTp6YnJIGEQ43+ uMnP7cc5/ZMo7lRegvI1jremgep5yoI5kQqkkkXPnNBcp2cAhc6SAVzgk4zx0X8VaeU5 lt1dIsstVgojN5kzKMB1I7A5/t24i3CedGjmjoyKV2LRtojAOpSe4+YIPb/HHLXr1dY6 Xn77IXMZoVno+XPtS26G9QgEVL0nPvoR69+kdtlpGVDCjUXMvqHYbhWGqZI2tdJcIoC1 fJRwy9PX6njd6gUdFV1TdIeymkCsmexbIAwfkOx8cD7HX3m1wTJLarpFCS/uMyjC6gdm D522x5xxviNuq5mnkerSqJPRjqKp5VMhJ9qocrqCk53Ge2fnJn5muVqAhuFOsdMdo5Ol GhK9++Sx9uCD/wCeJtBzBfY0qKqi6CUs0YRnqKZJlYBtR0EkaTuMkYyOIcFztldLJ96V MZlycrA3Q3Lb4ABxnx9Rx40vLgYgfGbEjarONj+nEGnZkOuno3oFOxEgTV375jx3IyP2 42VYBRC0gV5CVZ1yrMAMgZG5Gfn8zkcQopoba3UaaYqcEgTMBuc9icbnf6fLbhgt3NPL Ku71tsetYoqx4eDKuDuzF0OxHjOfpxJqubrfMhSnsMUcXYNNDRyEDx7umDsAO2P9k64V djuDRLUVEVHIkhaKKFuhI7kEaFaJR7guTg4wB/cbcOb7Xy8qrVXyz0MJAAS/U7XBnGNW ELpJpyN+w9o4iSc98nVsdLJXStQqZG+FuVPUilttbNp90UNPCmcon4hDgDSQcgjjy4ep npzbIkN2vcbxjJT4asenbGnO7dMknSQM7ZO+/HLX2bPX3kCH0K5BqYrs9OtXcedZKcXO op2q4jLzxzNKjT/Bq9MHMTqdMDlcEec46Hk9V/Sm59Oe+81255SAYxHVSxOvt9o1dFv6 fke/yGxZ4Oe+R7jTLFBzpaaWlTegjqZKiWWrmIAMEcgj3ZUwwDAbDPnih/tB83WK28ve m91udXBHbrD6/ehVwmliESz1C3L1KsHKtFJCZU0vDBcOY6Ctrw0kUi2qCukpuvVpT0tR d1B6oem1fW1T1lfPSCONGpas3Fo6arm1lWiREjJJQZcq+F3Hnhkh9ULFWg0tPcaFqTdQ zAM5XtnqaMk4A77kb+ePYL9ypDUJNScwW2iqZm0u1d1amJwMsFhjEemNwclm8r7c9+CE 3O1qpJ1+OvFkrocL+WlGNOPBlRsbY8dvHniJVeoHJqJVSU1bC6mEfFKkv4cMWQQyp0wq e44yozgAHinrr63+nVraRae922KQM3UaZxKVI3OcxZGGzsDtjHEFfXv0nKgvzvYA5ALg ySAhiMsCOh4ORxX9t+1J6XwtJPcucrXUTRKGWnhqZIywB2wGiZdwSd/PFX85f6h3plHJ JbY3ip0tmZkqTUUumcuDFpGmHXkBdR1bDPz4oit/1E+X7jJLDaXiqChIULJTOe5HlRnf /wBHFNc4f6h/NNuCizW5NbO4ctT0Ug06crga1xg75xvvxzVzZ/qMerdV1I/iIqCE5Gr4 SGPSO2cxTgjA/wC/7inqz7efqKnUaHnOjElR7KimlSaSeSMEkJSOZ8QTBzvIDnSMduAk X28+ZaBmkqnusczHJq7xWrXUbHJOqOGWZ9C7kgDHsIHgjhZv/wBvXm2rjZob1JUK2Q3w 0zJT0wxs6RdYLGTspKAE7AnHFG3X7bPq28shsNVW3pjn8JGNRpO+xE9UACD7Rj5bbcce 8s/bD9auTuVbfyhzDY/UOgW0tcow9HytfKikSSrutbXvJBWwTSxVCFasfiwyumchHZAC XLlP7XPP1ZUGejq/UqvfWc07cu8zM4O7eyKWT3AElBpBywKjtx0NyX9sX1Lpq+Tr2T1g uWenFiHlDmiGK3EM/wDGHqkpURPp6f4GG3RicMCbZ58+2H6jc1crWXl2lsPqLe509SfS O6yR3bkrmC2UdHScpeqvJHNdyr5q25slOsdBb7NU1VPVatAqKaNk1EaTdUHrjz5dx94W jmb4x4C0tfZYGqTV2unPtSoqGM6w9OSRukmjJ1qc+3cMVJ9qrmWKEwR3+da2H2mE1E2o uCFII6wB9wYd+BVP9vTmqx18sHNC3KppUA+7pKeoSmJqNTByzvMxkHSA9pxuc8Rq/wC3 ZzdzNWJBa5bjSRHSFaaqEgGxXOY5gT2GTjHz4A3v7RXqRd4ZIaHnU27Ca6wySVp1QsBh R0qgaSG+eR4x34oi/wDqL6hVMMr23muru07FzItNVVx3JyQOpUjGWOMA48DPFfHm/wBU ySTU3/J3OK6pAye+B8VsM9uHjmzmDmS7U5+GkvVK+CC0ddPGTtjfpzKcefnwj2zl7na4 tI8VZXaIwGqWq5aio1RZwAGM7FTq3ycjH6jhgiunLXLxKXSuq0r12ISvlhBcf9AB85Pf uRwEvnqNRiOD4eeSVDIywhpy7Ehdss27DHcHbO/FeXfmnmG5ApDROYXGA/RjY4PkNqB+ X+3C5Fyq9e3WrKhqSQnUNTSKC3yAQ7EZJx3/APLvaeQZp9KJcqWVc7LURyz/AC//AHkY GNxjPDZVen0tNTq1X8BUIciNKWkEDBgBkyZHvUjsCNm38cVre+RamZnNHEaQjYGNTGW8 d4iud9/Pk8I78q35Z4Y6pVlhgkL5miMgYYIIJctnbG3b9eLFoeR3uEUUlNTpDJGASaSM U7McAbmIKT7iT37+eLr5Hp4aJ5LdWVUFrZY0/iK9Wk+Iy+OmjKC4ZdOoknsfnvwd5uko rRAGpqyO5NIudFIzJnK6sDqAAHPywP7cI9ovlwsrvU0tproEu4FJUySSRsrxRt1VAIYE e7DE77Ht24z5liukNG9faUSDUpeUSxCV/wAoY4YEYJZs+T4Hnjnar5kpUrWX4SsuFwLa bgDULJFFCC2h4oZcrCxkDKWUliPb8uLf5P515XoIkMdjrHuJxgPUU7qXyD/LZMHHuGM/ QHhlruZ+YK4s9zs6222uMUEgpKaFp5f60aSJsy4jKsA4ABye/FK82113Z36DTU8JyS0D NBkfUxupz+x+o3PFeZmO7Xi5AnuPvGrGD5H8zweO47hQzVsqK9zpIE21fhSLtj5pgHtx 9caWlstFTOl/p3eod43SJp1JCoGwcjB3Pb6cJdXZaG8t/Iaodv8A7lIIOfO41D9j578S LL6cWanrUkurERSlRTRu7jEgJZhurA+04OB4zxaF05TtVNRxijpY2jKgatKN/QN8lAd9 v85PA6j5Mt8iGSWkebOwWJlQofmcr2I2AB4kScn0q56FNVQ43GJjscf9P0+X9hxCew3O jlhaghqKoSPonSQtMEjAJDASNhcnYkd+Jlw5Sq6uATTQmAAAvhNGPaN8Ie4O+P8Ajhfb lSzXhUt9PUoK2nYvNhmLaHGhc4UHuD3J3/bhysXK8XK2mSZVqEODuCwOCWz+ICO2P+3D PcKu0NAsg+77Y75VZK2njlEpUZ0xaI8hx3JPcdjxWd05dtl0dpbjXLUQqcj4KSSmyo2G DjbYg9tvpwDgksVlaYWSkrqupRPdHV1YrY8BtulFONMbas5YblRjJ7BUvVfXcxJLDcG+ 6UClURl6IfHtwBASN13GR/txQnMPLd1eZwloq3poGaWKsptEXxDHKlDIGDyBR7gH2Gcj c54C2aOuiqRG9iu6BW3lM6ADBIznVnHb/wDvex63miGjp6aGZqlWDELHUVBkCtoA2BJA bbBx3A+XCXer/U1SEdMdE7atK9sd8jf/AB+nfhQ+It53M2CdyNbbE9x+Xxx2LScxNTRu jJ1JGB0g6W8gj8xJG2RtjhHNNzHWXOoloVeVagBXjlQzRwqGZg0aO4WMknBZQCcY7cab nJzXy0yTMAQ2CQYcAe0sdmfG2cbDHB5vUKtoLZBWVlMawszApCkaPHpUMWy5IUnsNPY7 HPB7lL1Vud/qFo6G3Sxw5CyfFLDUYGSCVOfbuBjHYbcX3a6qgpSlTbLRc7ldZlAuEcdV HJTwwAakcU8mFj1SFlLLksAF7Dd5iu1vnjDV8KWllHuFUqeNtxGp7Yz+mT8uNzcy2BoJ Kf7ytU6xqSOhCI5U8ZZ+nkjAwB889u/FMc8eqHLnLdPIz1CTHDHSsoxjGcYdSPp/bY8J nLvqpbebEkSz0kFPNSZmnm6cDM8TN0wC0aq/5t/cSBnA34WOdOdKnpNFHVssu4GliN8Y 2APf5b7/AKYzz/d7zdZnhlu1xq4YUmY0IWoniDzEHWDpkIYdM50kAA78bl5svC0/8VXM lCq7sGkRyuAM9QOT2074+fkHgBUepdiy8FimrJrlF7q3VXNKBESQmlCF0fiht8nOeItB 6kV9RMYpYJmDHGXZWO5I7lj4HfPb/PvMD3e9i3tRfeDCKpaSZKepkQCNo9I1qsiqVycD uM8E2tN3alRY46yOTSCcyOSTgdyHGTtvknfjOGzXfXTCaI/hyko86dQBiO7amJYb5OfO /G7mp6Cmo0S6zQSOEAVKMfCtnQuMkKdWwIyfOTtxWfx9ENlgcr/TkqTp8ZONzjz547Lt V1s9sjcXXT8Qc6NRVdsgr3DZ2z5HEixXFpbhcKiIolM8CCnOkEFllJOCMf0kHYDuTk44 kXO3JdVb4uoXSM43cY8YGM+MDsP88V3W2Q0zS/D1MciICwjkDygjPYBvaM/PH0/RQfmG 026YmsvVFZpozsp6kJkZSQP5K75xq3O/1IPE6D17mtcVTFJBU3KkiiBp6y3Sx05d9QDd SRmDyIFAIVvJyd9wp0/rNzpzbWSfcUNRTohIPxapUjZmXcLKM7jfOfpvxldPUHnm8oLV WVtIktv/AB/4GkNJMeoOniV4pMyKNOQrEgHcfPhaqLdzPe0Vqgz1KAnIIds+MHVIdv27 /Xi07FDXWi2U8VPTtSSOzLUPpUdRAFIGVKnZhq8gfLuOIfMNvlrIS0dUTUkfl1SH3Yxj T+/f9OK+i5S5irJW+9mf4GD30zYZPex0t7tbE+wqcYAHEW4cpmdlihuJOMBoQ8+TtjGN h3/z2AIIDhy1yLb4hhLefiGAE0rBG6i5BUAlS2AcncnOfJOeHmp5Po6OMSR0Kh8ZzoTf 2j/p7d/088Q46GrhhnMCQ034YGqWENnDDAUjcEbH/fGOFimst1uFU5nvVNToGII0TqAA SD+VsDx22+mRxLktqwOaGG+QVj1YEMpiNRqpVHuEpL4IBYFQUJbt+nAqt5Pt3LP8ZNcD eZZ/eITLNKEJHU06akMgxqK+3zt24E/dgf3rQgK/uA0R7BtwPy/I8dF3XlSdQrVa6Ij3 dgdsDf3Ak/7fvwNuXK9BT0FLWWq6sJopXetj+IqGAh0AKAvtVPeTuM/LHnhZe5cv1YNM a+sFahKgJXzKpYe3dB3zhjgk9/14Tr3V3fpNBVs6UURZqKSPMUskjbMskobVKoTDAMMA nPc8UBf5bpNUsBTvLFkgO6q5A33DMcn9frsONVssZrZYkkadBkF06rhBnOcoDjBP0PF3 WqgpLBTI1JEWdgC2kgEnAY52Gck/37b44PtU2eWNamtpzHVpvTaGSIyy40lZQqkTLpJI Vjpzkj6lLXLd7k2axqWhoI/5bfCrGXUErkvFuxK4OSB8/PB83f4Vlp5FSamc6IZVVQDI Blvc2Sdh2wMeN88Y1tTD09Sw7uMjIXY4GD22znfgBUUNTJGHzPpqGKKOq+Bjc4GcbjGw HbzxuoLa1ocTy07SZOcyBX7nP9Wd8Ht5G3bhygkNxaPpR/DNEdQKhUDEjGn8PGcd8Nnb 9uM7vScwiNTGgMI89IbDSO51/pgkfr44wp7Y91gRJ50p5KL8Zlwy9TVhCrCM+4DvhiR9 OCtFT0Dfw8yRYB0l0VULb47hQcbZ89+NNfarNTtFiamoRJIQZ511BhpLYUomoEdySex4 iVdJdIlQcv1lmuinZle2ipcbeGnAA39u2Pl240C08yMAzUVMGIBYCihUAncgDOwB7DwN uHO9Xarv1MywLpjCkEqq5G2k7rg9/wBOKlFrmq6qanWveMwgSTIZZsMjMyhQFOPzDvuD k/IHiHU2+nt5zFTO8ufdLlSP1OoAnJ377cCrgzVcCxxkTTKzHpDcpnGCQdsHcHv2+vCd Ny5zDNJqFvJiznV0UPt386ge2PH+wkwWeejDZpiszgLgouQc57ePPnh55Zp5VY/H0+pD sNSqPPgHPgD/AJA4LX5YaKnaoioRIMezCxkIwAOTkAecbY7ftwoCmgvNBLLXXQW4pr0x LLLD2IGPwduxzgYBx8+D1mQUdJEJmFVTxyMYJiS2p9gTrkyze3Hjzvng7M1Tc9MdFTfl wNkU+MDcYJz8vP8A3aLTZ7swQVVGwSHDpmJcajgfNs7Y3/cZ7EjeFbQkZpRkDAwiDcDH f9vlwOlMUdJCZFFMyOxVtl1nSMj2DJ+e+3z4CVHM9Yo6JZWiGwYqN1Ht7k/QHOOI1HUU V0kYJW9F4AJJwski6lJKhSEA/q33yOC5MRAW3S9eRTvgliTjGNwMknP/ABxnX3S9Q00c acq118jyRVNRpSq9HEFGJ5WmIIVm9gKe7PjHCzDRR10pqKB6u1TqcyU9RUu5U5IIKxEK CGJB3xtttjgn8eyexr3AGT2sCZchl2Ofrkcf/9k= --============_-1132795989==_============ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Regards, Horace Heffner --============_-1132795989==_============-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 15 05:22:32 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2FDMOwq031125; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 05:22:25 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2FDM885030882; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 05:22:08 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 05:22:08 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Sender: jack mail3.centurytel.net Message-ID: <4055AC9B.D9B5710 centurytel.net> Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 13:16:11 +0000 From: "Taylor J. Smith" X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0C-Caldera (X11; I; Linux 2.2.5-15 i486) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: electrical Mars? References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; name="xmars" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="xmars" Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53566 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: At 10:43 AM 3/14/4, Terry Blanton wrote: The Martian Air Force seems to be a bit overly cautious in observing the rovers. Maybe they have monitored Earth television transmissions and recognize the similarity between the rovers and Number Five from "Short Circuit" who was equipped with a powerful laser: Horace wrote: ... Personally, I like the "alien press" explanation. The press is everywhere, so if other intelligent life exists, why would their press not be at Gusev taking historic photos and writing articles? 8^) Since we are visiting new planets it can not be long before we have to endure cultural assimilation. 8^) Hi All, Here's another perspective on what the rovers are finding. Jack Smith ---------------------------- THOTH, A Catastrophics Newsletter, VOL VIII, No 1, March 15, 2004 SPIRIT CHASES A MARTIAN MIRAGE By Wal Thornhill [editor's note: This article was written as a day-by-day commentary while the Mars rover missions were in their early phases of exploration. It reflects only that data which has been released to the public to date. More will be added to the holoscience website later.] ... On January 21, 2004 ground controllers were able to send commands to Spirit and received a simple signal acknowledging that the rover heard them, but they did not receive expected scientific and engineering data during scheduled communication passes during the rest of that martian day ... As discussed later in this report, Spirit is moving about in an area where there are frequent dust devils. The dust devils are not simply rotating winds caused by rising warm air. They are the form lightning takes in the thin Martian atmosphere. So they are a great hazard to surface craft, with their powerful electrostatic and electromagnetic effects. Just as the Galileo spacecraft suffered repeated computer glitches when it flew too close above the plumes of the electrical jets on Io, it is possible that Spirit has become a lightning rod and suffered internal arcing ? with possibly serious consequences for its onboard electronics. I sincerely hope not! Full text of this article, with photos, is available at Wal Thornhill's website, http://www.holoscience.com/news.php?article=b50z4mj1 ... Postscript January 29, 2004: Mars Mission News by Steve Squyres at Cornell University: "We're back on track now, after getting a pretty serious scare from Spirit. Spirit's problems seem to have been caused by little more than a fouled-up computer file system... not too different from what can happen when you hit the power button on your computer accidentally and corrupt a bunch of files on your hard drive. The JPL flight software team is hot on the trail of this thing now, and I'm hoping that Spirit will make a full recovery." THORNHILL COMMENTS: Since no Martians have been spotted gazing into Spirit's cameras, we must assume there was no extraterrestrial digit to 'hit the power button.' But you can get the same effect on your home computer when lightning strikes in the neighborhood ... Spirit is examining the floor of Gusev Crater, which terminates a large channel called Ma'adim Vallis. I wrote about Ma'adim Vallis in July 2002, in "Water on Mars?": ". . what is the story of the formation of Ma'adim Vallis? An arc cutting Gusev crater will sap electrons from the surrounding terrain by creating a strong radial electric field that begins to rip electrons from the solid surface. When breakdown begins, a lightning bolt tears across the surface, blasting soil and rock to either side of its sinuous path. A large proportion of the excavated material is impelled electrostatically to follow the main discharge toward space. Pieces not pulled into space would fall back in a more or less random scattering all over Mars. That explains why there is little evidence of deposition inside Gusev Crater from a channel that is larger than the Grand Canyon. It is also the reason why every Mars lander has returned a vista of rubble that extends to the horizon." See Astronomy Picture of the Day's "Carving Ma'adim Valles" for a conventional explanation: http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap020627.html THORNHILL COMMENTS: Already scientists have begun to express surprise at the information streaming back from Spirit. The press release of 19 January: Scientists chose Adirondack to be Spirit's first target rock rather than another rock, called Sashimi, that would have been a shorter, straight-ahead drive. Rocks are time capsules containing evidence of the environmental conditions of the past, said Dr. Dave Des Marais, a rover science-team member from NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, Calif. "We needed to decide which of these time capsules to open." Sashimi appears dustier than Adirondack. The dust layer could obscure good observations of the rock's surface, which may give information about chemical changes and other weathering from environmental conditions affecting the rock since its surface was fresh. Also, Sashimi is more pitted than Adirondack. That makes it a poorer candidate for the rover's rock abrasion tool, which scrapes away a rock's surface for a view of the interior evidence about environmental conditions when the rock first formed. Adirondack has a "nice, flat surface" well suited to trying out the rover's tools on their first martian rock, Des Marais said. "The hypothesis is that this is a volcanic rock, but we'll test that hypothesis," he said. THORNHILL COMMENTS: Most of the soil and rock found on Mars has been recently excavated from the depths of craters, canyons and channels, like Ma'adim Vallis, elsewhere on Mars. To gain some perspective, the Valles Marineris canyons are up to 9 kilometers deep. Mars is a major source of meteorites and asteroidal bodies (just two of the latter remain as Mars' tiny moons, Phobos and Deimos). If the rocks are "time capsules" from the past it is a very recent past. They have had no time to weather. And the story they have to tell will not fit any conventional geological theory. The scattered rocks are not likely to be volcanic. Many will have suffered plasma heating and shock effects from a cosmic electric discharge. The holes in some of the rock surfaces may be plasma arc craters or they may be due to trapped gases being explosively released by hot plasma. Unweathered surface mineral The press release of 20 January: ""We're starting to put together a picture of what the soil at this particular place in Gusev Crater is like. There are some puzzles and there are surprises," said Dr. Steve Squyres of Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y., principal investigator for the suite of instruments on Spirit and on Spirit's twin, Opportunity. One unexpected finding was the Moessbauer spectrometer's detection of a mineral called olivine, which does not survive weathering well. This spectrometer identifies different types of iron-containing minerals; scientists believe many of the minerals on Mars contain iron. "This soil contains a mixture of minerals, and each mineral has its own distinctive Moessbauer pattern, like a fingerprint," said Dr. Goestar Klingelhoefer of Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany, lead scientist for this instrument. The lack of weathering suggested by the presence of olivine might be evidence that the soil particles are finely ground volcanic material, Squyres said. Another possible explanation is that the soil layer where the measurements were taken is extremely thin, and the olivine is actually in a rock under the soil. THORNHILL COMMENTS: Olivine is a common mineral found on Earth in recent lavas and meteorites. However, it rapidly breaks down when exposed to water and weathering. The soil and rocks on Mars have lain exposed for a mere few thousand years, not millions or billions of years. They have not been exposed to water or had time to weather. Cohesive Soil The news item continues: "Scientists were also surprised by how little the soil was disturbed when Spirit's robotic arm pressed the Moessbauer spectrometer's contact plate directly onto the patch being examined. Microscopic images from before and after that pressing showed almost no change. "I thought it would scrunch down the soil particles," Squyres said. "Nothing collapsed. What is holding these grains together?" THORNHILL COMMENTS: Gusev crater is situated in the heavily cratered southern highlands of Mars. Crater floors are formed not by impact but by a rotating arc that neatly machines the circular crater, leaving a flat floor. Many smaller craters were subsequently burnt into the floor of Gusev crater. Today, the area where Spirit landed is covered with the trails of so-called "dust devils." Normal earthly lightning cannot occur in the thin atmosphere of Mars, Instead it takes the slower diffuse form of a tornado. We should expect the electrical activity on the Martian surface, both in the past and in the present, to produce glassified soil with the cohesive strength of a fulgurite (sand loosely fused by lightning). Electric discharges are sometimes used to immaculately clean a surface. The dark paths left by the Martian dust devils should show microscopic signs of having been cleaned by a corona discharge. I would urge the Spirit team, if possible, to include one of the dark trails in their traverse. Chlorine and Sulfur The news item continues: "Information from another instrument on the arm, an alpha particle X-ray spectrometer, may point to an answer. This instrument "measures X-ray radiation emitted by Mars samples, and from this data we can derive the elemental composition of martian soils and rocks," said Dr. Johannes Brueckner, rover science team member from the Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Mainz, Germany. The instrument found the most prevalent elements in the soil patch were silicon and iron. It also found significant levels of chlorine and sulfur, characteristic of soils at previous martian landing sites but unlike soil composition on Earth. Squyres said, "There may be sulfates and chlorides binding the little particles together." Those types of salts could be left behind by evaporating water, or could come from volcanic eruptions, he said. The soil may not have even originated anywhere near Spirit's landing site, because Mars has dust storms that redistribute fine particles around the planet. The next target for use of the rover's full set of instruments is a rock, which is more likely to have originated nearby." THORNHILL COMMENTS: The presence of chlorine and sulfur in the Martian soil is of special interest because sulfur is commonly formed in cosmic discharges by fusing two oxygen atoms together. It is happening today on Io in cathodic arc jets (mistaken for volcanoes) so that its surface is buried in sulfur. (Io was probably an icy satellite originally, like the other Galilean satellites of Jupiter). But there was another more direct source of these elements for the Martian soil - the clouds of Venus! Venus was identified by the ancients as having discharged spectacularly to Mars for an extended period. For this reason the thin Martian atmosphere still has a whiff of the Venusian atmosphere, with its carbon dioxide and nitrogen. The Russian lander, Venera 12, found that the clouds of Venus hold 20 times as much chlorine as sulfur. This discovery was "so difficult to reconcile with other measurements that American researchers have tended to ignore or discount them, although no one has explained why they should be in error." [Venus Revealed, D Grinspoon, p. 120.] The Martian soil seems to retain a record of the encounter with Venus. It may also extend to the hematite deposits at the site of Spirit's twin, Opportunity. In addition there is a long-standing puzzle concerning the origin of the chlorine in our salty oceans. There is far too little chlorine in rocks to account for it. However, chlorine and sodium are strongly related in low-energy nuclear transformations of light elements, so both Mars and the Earth must have had chlorine added to their surface inventory from external energetic plasma discharge events. Concentrated plasma discharges are known to produce large numbers of neutrons. We should therefore expect anomalous levels of heavy isotopes formed by neutron capture. So we find the deuterium to hydrogen ratio (D/H) on Venus is "phenomenally high" at 120 times greater than on Earth. On Mars it is enriched 6 times the terrestrial value. It may represent the varying exposures of the three planets to recent cosmic discharge activity. And as was found on the Moon, anomalous radioactivity on Mars may be found to be associated with the focal points of those discharges - recent craters and other electrical scars. Spirit Finds Carbonates On Earth, carbonates such as limestone often form in liquid water. But one of the biggest Mars mysteries deals with "missing carbonates." Orbital images show valleys that look like dry riverbeds, suggesting that liquid water existed on an early Mars that had a thicker atmosphere and a warmer climate. If true, large quantities of carbon dioxide should have dissolved out of Mars1s atmosphere into the water and chemically reacted with other materials to form carbonates. But orbital data from Mars Global Surveyor's instrument reveal much lower carbonate abundances than predicted. [From SkyandTelescope.com] THORNHILL COMMENTS: Spirit has found the telltale signature of carbonates. The problem is to know what tale it is telling. Mars has changed so drastically in the recent past that its story may be indecipherable. But it is certain that it cannot be used to prove that a hypothetical greenhouse existed on Mars aeons ago. Any exogenous interference with Mars' atmosphere and surface material would tear up this particular history book. Hollow Mystery for Mars Rover A close-up image of an undisturbed patch of Martian soil has revealed a large number of hollow spheres or tubes. The Mars rover Spirit has completed its first full set of scientific measurements with the instruments on its robotic arm, revealing mysterious hollow grains in the soil. The one-metre arm used its microscope to take a close-up image of an undisturbed patch of soil next to the NASA rover. It shows mostly sand-sized particles, but with a large number of apparently hollow spheres or tubes. Such grains were completely unexpected. But John Grotzinger, a geologist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, says they closely resemble formations he has seen in soils in the southwestern deserts of the US. "There are little tubes that build up by capillary action," he told New Scientist, as salty water evaporates from the nearly-dry soil. The Martian grains must also be strong enough to withstand the region's strong winds and perpetual scouring by dust devils - tornado shaped vortexes that can tower to heights of kilometres. [From NewScientist.com] THORNHILL COMMENTS: The lunar surface has been subjected to electrical cratering and channel formation like that on Mars. (The only difference is that scientists have given up the idea that channels, or rilles, on the Moon were formed by water). A report by scientists studying a lunar dust sample remarked upon the large number of small glassy spherules and cylinders. It was their opinion that "they must have been formed free from restraints, perhaps blown from a melt as fine droplets or perhaps as a spray of molten glass; thus they were able to solidify in free flight under influence of surface tension forces. ..it is safe to conjecture that the cylindrical object in its initial molten state was part of a breakup of a thin jet.. A number of the grayish metallic-like spherules exhibit vacuole regions within their otherwise solid interiors.." [Science, Vol. 167, No. 3918, pp. 742-3.] THORNHILL COMMENTS: A cathode arc melts a surface and forms a jet of the melted material. The first microscopic investigation of the Martian soil supports the Electric Universe model. As for the southwestern deserts of the US, they were formed by the same electrical erosion processes that shaped the surface of Mars. We should expect to find many parallels. The European Space Agency and Mars Express "In the testing of hypotheses lies the prime difference between the investigator and the theorist. The one seeks diligently for the facts which may overthrow his tentative theory. The other closes his eyes to these, and searches only for those which will sustain it." - Grove Karl Gilbert, Chief Geologist of the US Geological Survey, 1895. THORNHILL: In the search for water on Mars there is a powerful human tendency to see only what you expect to find. Contrary data is forgotten or dismissed from consideration. Mirages are easily mistaken for water. For example, while MER is trundling about the surface the European Space Agency (ESA) has Mars Express in orbit about the red planet. ESA has chosen to use one of the most spectacular sights in the solar system - the colossal canyons of Valles Marineris ? to publicize their success. Image data from Mars Express has been used to generate a perspective view that is like looking out of an aircraft window. ESA1s news report says, "One looks at a landscape which has been predominantly shaped by the erosional action of water. Millions of cubic kilometres of rock have been removed, and the surface features seen now such as mountain ranges, valleys, and mesas, have been formed." THORNHILL: This offhanded statement from ESA is not supported by any of the geologists who have studied Valles Marineris. All now attribute the formation of its canyons to faulting of the Martian crust. The experts go on to admit, "However, why the Valles Marineris were faulted to form deep troughs is not known." It is a mystery because the answer lies outside the expertise of geologists. It was explained in Mars and the Grand Canyon and Spiral Galaxies & Grand Canyons. (www.holoscience.com) News releases like the one above are untruthful and self-serving. It seems that both NASA and ESA are dominated by theorists with one eye on funding, not impartial investigators. The great canyons and channels on Mars were not carved by water. There is no need for large volumes of water hidden beneath the surface to explain their peculiar features. The few gullies found in crater walls look as if they have been etched into the wall, not eroded by water. Mars had surface moisture or ice in the recent past as shown by "sloppy" electrical craters but seems to have lost most of it in the energetic events that caused the cratering. See ESA images with this article at http://www.holoscience.com/news.php?article=b50z4mj1 On the left the caption reads: "Crater formed in soft, probably water-logged ground. Note the splatter marks (lobate flows) around it." THORNHILL: Impact splatters do not form lobate flows. However, the heat from an electric discharge does cause moisture to 'sweat' to the surface and flow slowly away from the crater. On the right the caption reads: "Channels in a Martian crater probably formed by relatively recent running water." THORNHILL: In this example the channels were not formed by running water. The close-up on the right shows clearly that the large channel is V-shaped in cross-section with a narrow channel at its base and has transverse striations. The narrow inner channel remains remarkably constant in width. And one channel has crossed another with no sign of any diversion of material into the earlier channel. These features are hallmarks of powerful near-surface electric discharges travelling up the wall of the crater. The fans at the bottom of the channels must then have an electrical origin too, taking the form of diffuse corona discharge streamers ... From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 15 07:00:47 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2FF0fKN018829; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 07:00:42 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2FF0bvX018813; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 07:00:37 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 07:00:37 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <002901c40a95$d7ec29c0$85d0b141 computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: Subject: Re- Hydrogen-powered Weedmobile Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 08:00:11 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-ELNK-Trace: 0b1c9d71006e06a171639b933de7ae6f7e972de0d01da940bb558e0551572c039620d39464a9ddf9350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53567 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Just gather the weeds along the highway (the greener-wetter the better) and keep on going. :-) .......................................................................... United States Patent 5,651,953 Yokoyama , et al. July 29, 1997 "Hydrogen is produced from a cellulose-containing biomass by heating the biomass in the presence of water and a catalyst at a temperature of 250.degree.-374.degree. C. and at a pressure higher than the saturated vapor pressure of water. The catalyst includes a catalytic metal selected from the group consisting of nickel, iron, cobalt, molybdenum, tungsten, platinum and mixtures thereof" ..................................................................................... Catalytic converter beads gotten from the junkyard will probably work after they have been heated in air to burn off the carbon and lead. (Caution!). Regards Frederick From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 15 08:59:01 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2FGwlwq004020; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 08:58:48 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2FGwhFJ003975; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 08:58:43 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 08:58:43 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <007c01c40aa6$54a70f60$85d0b141 computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: Subject: Re- Hydrogen-powered Weedmobile Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 09:58:13 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-ELNK-Trace: 0b1c9d71006e06a171639b933de7ae6f7e972de0d01da9408375fcfcd6d5fc4d1301eb020fedbbde350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53568 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: It seems that a one-time pressurization of a small on-board reactor with CO2 (~1050 Psi,70 ATM at 88 F) to start the slightly exothermic reaction of the cellulose with water at 250 F or more: C6H10-O5 (162 grams) + 7 H2O (126 grams) ---> 6 CO2 (264 grams) + 12 H2 (24 grams). After that a water-biomass slurry can be metered into the reactor at high pressure with a small hydraulic pump, through an exhaust-gas heat exchanger, while the H2 is bled off through a ceramic gas filter. A power cord to run off wall socket during the night might help , too. Regards, Frederick From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 15 11:45:48 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2FJjU6S004259; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 11:45:30 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2FJjOSV004214; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 11:45:24 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 11:45:24 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 10:51:01 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Jumping dot anomaly: surprising data Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53569 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: There is also movement in the small crater just below the jumping dot. In order to make sure the "movement" was not due to filter changes, the following two photos were found using filter 2. Unfortunately they are not aligned, so carful alignment has to be accomplished befre togelling between the photos to see the motion. There is movement of one or two black objects in a left to right direction along the top rim of the small crater. Too bad the place is about 2.63 km from Spirit. It is right at the limits of resolution. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 15 13:48:31 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2FLmFbL026753; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 13:48:16 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2FLmAS1026719; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 13:48:10 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 13:48:10 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: temalloy metro.lakes.com (Unverified) Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <2.2.32.20040312180857.006ad044 pop.freeserve.net> References: <2.2.32.20040312180857.006ad044 pop.freeserve.net> Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 15:47:00 -0600 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: thomas malloy Subject: Re: Madrid and LENR Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-DCC-CPI-Metrics: Clear 1161; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53570 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Frank Grimer posted; > >What would the yield be in tons of TNT if all the >Deuterium in, say, a 10lb block of saturated metal >is transmuted to helium? Given the difficulty of reproducing the phenomena, and the small amount of energy released, I think that bomb making is the least of our concerns. Put another way, the only bombs involved in LENR research are the bomb calorimeters. > >If it should prove relatively easy to make a LENR bomb >then the implications for terrorism are pretty obvious. Given the difficulties, my preference would be chemical explosives. >What would the consequences be of a similar >development in the LNER field? Anarchy >World Government perhaps? The coming world government is inevitable. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 15 14:45:37 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2FMjSrb021584; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 14:45:29 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2FMjR7g021558; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 14:45:27 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 14:45:27 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Reply-To: From: "Keith Nagel" To: Subject: RE: Re- Hydrogen-powered Weedmobile Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 18:10:49 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 In-Reply-To: <007c01c40aa6$54a70f60$85d0b141 computer> Importance: Normal X-Rcpt-To: Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53571 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Hi Fred. Your weedmobile sounds like something from the feverish minds of Cheech & Chong. Lets see. Old newspaper's ~100$USD per ton. That's ~.15 tons of H2. Typical cost ~$100USD per Kg. by the cylinder or $13,600USD worth of hot air. You might think some genius MBA could build a business plan around that... How about hemp as the feedstock? It's the bamboo of North America. Cheap, and fast growing. Yep, the big bamboo. (grin) K. -----Original Message----- From: Frederick Sparber [mailto:fjsparber earthlink.net] Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 10:58 AM To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re- Hydrogen-powered Weedmobile It seems that a one-time pressurization of a small on-board reactor with CO2 (~1050 Psi,70 ATM at 88 F) to start the slightly exothermic reaction of the cellulose with water at 250 F or more: C6H10-O5 (162 grams) + 7 H2O (126 grams) ---> 6 CO2 (264 grams) + 12 H2 (24 grams). After that a water-biomass slurry can be metered into the reactor at high pressure with a small hydraulic pump, through an exhaust-gas heat exchanger, while the H2 is bled off through a ceramic gas filter. A power cord to run off wall socket during the night might help , too. Regards, Frederick From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 15 15:34:36 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2FNYHrb008331; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 15:34:17 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2FNYF05008299; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 15:34:15 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 15:34:15 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <00ca01c40ae3$6495a840$8837fea9 cpq> From: "Jones Beene" To: "vortex" Subject: 1/f fractals and maglev Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 15:15:22 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00C7_01C40AA0.56048B40" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53572 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: A This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_00C7_01C40AA0.56048B40 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Speaking of 1/f and potential overunity.... There is a lot of info on = the web about PM magnetic levitation, and on Bill B's site: http://www.amasci.com/maglev/levtr1.html There is also the prospect that 1/f noise can be captured most = effectively with a fractal antenna. A few folks will even tell you = correctly that a tiny amount of free-energy is available by rectifying = the output of a fractal antenna, or other kinds of efficient antennae = like the helical torus (CTHA), or Avramenko's plug. Yes, I know. This = energy could be 'free' but still originate from your local broadcasting = tower... but nevertheless, it would be interesting to see if it is = enough to keep a spinning top in motion for a time-frame of years. The LEVITRON may be a stolen invention, so one probably shouldn't buy it = from the turkeys that stole it - but nevertheless, we know that when the = top spins in the range from about 20 to 35 revolutions per second (rps) = it is stable - but unstable above 40 rps and below 18 rps. After a few = minutes of spinning it always reaches the lower stability limit due to = air friction and falls. The spin lifetime of the can be extended to = about 30 minutes by placing it in a vacuum. There is a "powered" version = that requires a battery and will spin a very long time even with no = vacuum. But there is a way that almost "perpetual motion " could be obtained = without the battery, if any tiny amount of energy could be rectified = from 1/f noise, ZPE or whatever. This noise might be somehow increased = in the vicinity of the spin itself. The head of Caltech's Physics Dept. has an interesting site: http://www.its.caltech.edu/~atomic/display/displaycase.htm where he discusses his efforts to keep a top spinning using a battery. = They achieved almost a year and had it not been for earthquakes and so = on, it could have been longer. Go down to the item called: The Perpetual Top and then below that is he = shows the powered version of the Levitron.=20 I don't know why he didn't even consider replacing the 9 v. battery with = caps and an antenna - for effect - at least, even if the EM energy is = coming from broadcast waves instead of ZPE. Maybe the answer is related = to why he is a prof at Caltech, or maybe its because he has too much = education and too little inventiveness (and/or exposure to vortex). Most = progress does come slowly from incrementally advancing the status quo, = and in my experience, most professors are very good at that but not = worth much for riskier adventuring. And less educated inventors should = be thankful as it gives them a window for the occasional big advance, = unlikely as it might be...and the big advance can start with an accident = (Goodyear and Curie), or by wiring something up incorrectly (profs = seldom do that). OK. Enough philosophizing. =20 To paraphrase and incorporate the 1/f capture idea into the info from = the site:=20 The goal of the PM spin top (PM =3D either permanent magnet or perpetual = motion, depending on you boldness) is to make a device that will spin = for many years with no battery, only a tiny amount of extra energy which = could be supplied from 1/f or ZPE, assuming that some of it can be = rectified. Perpetual motion may be forbidden by someone's so-called law = and by our patent office, but our solar system and every atom in our = body indicates that things can spin for many billions of years without = loosing much, and that should be adequate encouragement for present = needs. The spinning top contains embedded in it a small permanent magnet, = oriented perpendicular to the spin axis and balanced with a washer near = the lower end. The base contains a levitating magnet, a bifilar coil = around the levitating magnet, an NPN transistor, a capacitor instead of = a battery, and a fractal antenna. Many who have been around = "free-energy" ideas for a while will recognize the professor's circuit, = as modified here, as a tank circuit. That is promising for reasons that = he might not appreciate. The electrical circuit would need to be = enhanced from the schematic shown - to include recharging the cap from = the fractal antenna. Probably a bridge rectifier is all you need between = the fractal antenna and the cap. This company can supply a fractal = antenna: http://www.fractenna.com/ After startup as the spinning magnet slows a bit, it begins to wobble = slightly and a current is induced in one winding in such a direction as = to make the base of the transistor (an NPN) go positive. That makes the = emitter-collector current flow through winding B, in the opposite = direction to A. This should both speed-up and center the spin slightly, = keeping it in equilibrium. The induction from A to B is regenerative, = doubly so if you use a true bifilar coil, but there are small losses. = There is no preference to clockwise or counter-clockwise rotation for = the top. Actually you might improve on the good professor's design by = any number of specialties and gimmicks... Where is Scott McKie when we = need him? The beauty of the system is that energy is fed back into the spinner by = its own control system regardless of how it is spinning, and if the = device is in a bell jar with a near vacuum, levitated to eliminate = friction, then the energy required to keep up spin could be miniscule to = the point of being nearly unmeasurable. Will the fractal antenna supply = enough to continually recharge the cap(s) and permit perpetual spinning? = I think there is a fair chance of that. The only thing that I can guarantee is if it did spin for years with no = battery... within microseconds of anyone announcing that accomplishment, = skeptics would jump out of the woodwork to claim that the energy was = coming... not from ZPE at all but from the plethora of RF broadcast = waves in any urban area, i.e. from TV, radio, cellular, etc. And they = would be correct, at least partially. Would putting the whole thing in a Faraday cage silence the skeptics or = silence the spinner ? Jones ------=_NextPart_000_00C7_01C40AA0.56048B40 Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Speaking of 1/f and potential overunity.... There is a lot of info = on the=20 web about PM magnetic levitation, and on Bill B's site:
http://www.amasci.com/m= aglev/levtr1.html
 
There is also the prospect that 1/f noise can be captured most = effectively=20 with a fractal antenna. A few folks will even tell you = correctly that a=20 tiny amount of free-energy is available by rectifying the output of a = fractal=20 antenna, or other kinds of efficient antennae like the helical torus = (CTHA), or=20 Avramenko's plug. Yes, I know. This energy could be 'free' but still = originate=20 from your local broadcasting tower... but nevertheless, it would be = interesting=20 to see if it is enough to keep a spinning top in motion for a time-frame = of=20 years.
 
The LEVITRON may be a stolen invention, so one probably shouldn't = buy it=20 from the turkeys that stole it - but nevertheless, we know = that=20 when the top spins in the range from about 20 to 35 revolutions per = second=20 (rps) it is stable - but unstable above 40 rps and below 18 rps. After a = few=20 minutes of spinning it always reaches the lower stability limit due = to air=20 friction and falls. The spin lifetime of the can be extended to = about 30=20 minutes by placing it in a vacuum. There is a "powered" version that = requires a=20 battery and will spin a very long time even with no vacuum.
 
But there is a way that almost "perpetual motion " could be = obtained=20 without the battery, if any tiny amount of energy could be rectified = from 1/f=20 noise, ZPE or whatever. This noise might be somehow increased in the = vicinity of=20 the spin itself.
 
The head of Caltech's Physics Dept. has an interesting site:
http:= //www.its.caltech.edu/~atomic/display/displaycase.htm
where he discusses his efforts to keep a top spinning using a = battery. They=20 achieved almost a year and had it not been for earthquakes and so on, it = could=20 have been longer.
 
Go down to the item called: The Perpetual Top and then below = that=20 is he shows the powered version of the Levitron.
 
I don't know why he didn't even consider replacing the 9 v. battery = with=20 caps and an antenna - for effect - at least, even if the EM energy = is=20 coming from broadcast waves instead of ZPE. Maybe the answer = is=20 related to why he is a prof at Caltech, or maybe its because he = has too=20 much education and too little inventiveness (and/or exposure to = vortex).=20 Most progress does come slowly from incrementally advancing the status = quo, and=20 in my experience, most professors are very good at that but not worth = much for=20 riskier adventuring. And less educated inventors should be thankful as = it gives=20 them a window for the occasional big advance, unlikely as it might = be...and the=20 big advance can start with an accident (Goodyear and Curie), or by = wiring=20 something up incorrectly (profs seldom do that). OK. Enough=20 philosophizing.
  
To paraphrase and incorporate the 1/f capture idea into the = info from=20 the site:
The goal of the PM spin top (PM =3D either permanent = magnet or=20 perpetual motion, depending on you boldness) is to make a = device that=20 will spin for many years with no battery, only a tiny amount of = extra=20 energy which could be supplied from 1/f or ZPE, assuming that some of it = can be=20 rectified.  Perpetual motion may be forbidden by someone's = so-called law=20 and by our patent office, but our solar system and every atom in our = body=20 indicates that things can spin for many billions of years = without=20 loosing much, and that should be adequate encouragement for present = needs.
 
The spinning top contains embedded in it a small permanent magnet, = oriented=20 perpendicular to the spin axis and balanced with a washer near the lower = end.  The base contains a levitating magnet, a bifilar coil around = the=20 levitating magnet, an NPN transistor, a capacitor instead of a=20 battery, and a fractal antenna. Many who have been around=20 "free-energy" ideas for a while will recognize the professor's circuit, = as=20 modified here, as a tank circuit. That is promising for reasons=20 that he might not appreciate. The electrical circuit would need to = be=20 enhanced from the schematic shown - to include recharging the cap = from the=20 fractal antenna. Probably a bridge rectifier is all you need = between the=20 fractal antenna and the cap. This company can supply a fractal = antenna:

After startup as the spinning magnet slows a=20 bit, it begins to wobble slightly and a current is induced in one = winding=20 in such a direction as to make the base of the transistor (an NPN) go=20 positive.  That makes the emitter-collector current flow through = winding B,=20 in the opposite direction to A.  This should both speed-up and = center the=20 spin slightly, keeping it in equilibrium. The induction from A to B is=20 regenerative, doubly so if you use a true bifilar coil, but there are = small=20 losses. There is no preference to clockwise or counter-clockwise = rotation for=20 the top.  Actually you might improve on the good professor's design = by any number of specialties and gimmicks... Where is Scott McKie = when we=20 need him?

The beauty of the system is that energy is fed back into the = spinner by=20 its own control system regardless of how it is spinning, and if the = device is in=20 a bell jar with a near vacuum, levitated to eliminate friction, then the = energy=20 required to keep up spin could be miniscule to the point of being nearly = unmeasurable. Will the fractal antenna supply enough to continually = recharge the=20 cap(s) and permit perpetual spinning? I think there is a fair chance of=20 that.
 
The only thing that I can guarantee is if it did spin for years = with no=20 battery... within microseconds of anyone announcing that accomplishment, = skeptics would jump out of the woodwork to claim that the energy was = coming...=20 not from ZPE at all but from the plethora of RF broadcast waves in = any=20 urban area, i.e. from TV, radio, cellular, etc. And they would be = correct,=20 at least partially.
 
Would putting the whole thing in a Faraday cage silence the = skeptics or=20 silence the spinner ?
 
Jones
 
 
 
 
------=_NextPart_000_00C7_01C40AA0.56048B40-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 15 18:13:45 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2G2DWPD005384; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 18:13:33 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2G2DPN1005332; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 18:13:25 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 18:13:25 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <02c701c40af3$769196c0$7cfea8c0 newmicronpc> From: "jonfli" To: References: <004101c408f6$67c29940$7cfea8c0 newmicronpc> <001001c4090a$288452a0$8837fea9@cpq> <008801c40923$a0d167c0$7cfea8c0@newmicronpc> <000d01c409e8$207ad500$8837fea9@cpq> Subject: Re: Minato PM Motor Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 19:10:24 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Resent-Message-ID: <76eemB.A.NTB.ELmVAB ultra5.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53573 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Jones, > Jon, > > You are probably aware of the recent evolution of PM motor design where the stator "back iron" is, in effect, allowed to rotate with the rotor and the only true stator left is the copper winding - thus allowing magnets and iron to rotate in unison with a constant flux distribution and giving about as close to 100% efficiency as possible. I have to admit that I'm not aware of this particular PM motor design! > And I believe it was you who tried to reproduce the MEG stuff some time ago. Yes, that's correct. > So my off-the-wall question is this. If you combine the underlying ideas of the above and if OU is possible using PM magnets with some copper windings to accomplish flux gating (which I doubt) why couldn't one start with this so-called "ironless" PM motor design and add to it by using a large tubular magnet on the outside of the copper stator (IOW a large solenoid PM with the poles aligned axially) and use the windings inside of that magnet to rotate its flux in order to the couple with a free rotating core on the inside, which would then couple to the output rotor? IMO, the structure you describe above would not affect the magnetic field of the tubular PM because of it's low permeability (~1). The free rotating core (assuming ferromagnetic material) would offer a higher permeability and would therefore provide a lower reluctance path for both the PM and coil's flux fields. > Perhaps that is what Minato is doing. I think Minato's designs are based on a near magnetically balanced arrangement between rotor and stator in which very little outside force or energy is required to sustain rotation. This sounds good but one must still overcome any lenz effects in order for this type of system to produce excess of 100% efficiency. I do happen to believe this is possible however due to my own research on near dragless electrostatic generators and perhaps Minato has discovered how to accomplish this. Jon From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 15 19:52:16 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2G3q12a007973; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 19:52:02 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2G3pxh5007955; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 19:51:59 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 19:51:59 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <002701c40b01$64f57fe0$0c80b341 computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: Subject: Re: Hydrogen-powered Weedmobile Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 20:48:28 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-ELNK-Trace: 0b1c9d71006e06a171639b933de7ae6f7e972de0d01da94044585e2de1723ec2627c62160a4dafd3350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53574 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Hi Keith. You wrote; > Hi Fred. > Your weedmobile sounds like something from > the feverish minds of Cheech & Chong Nope, United States Patent 5,651,953 Yokoyama , et al. July 29, 1997 It is a Japanese-owned patent. For the novice: go to this link and paste in the above patent number. http://patft.uspto.gov/netahtml/srchnum.htm They know the hydrogen value of that undigested toilet paper clogging the sewers of Tokyo, or floating in the East River. :-) > > Lets see. Old newspaper's ~100$USD per ton. That's > ~ .15 tons of H2. Typical cost ~$100USD per Kg. by > the cylinder or $13,600USD worth of hot air. > You might think some genius MBA could build > a business plan around that... Yes, at a cost of 100$USD per ton of cellulose feedstock, a Kg of H2 produced has a LHV fuel value about equal to a gallon of gasoline costing $0.67. > > How about hemp as the feedstock? It's the bamboo > of North America. Cheap, and fast growing. Good idea. In the early 70s, the New Mexico Dept of Ag measured the growth rate of a "False Bamboo" that is used as an ornamental that is cut to the ground every spring. It consistently produced over 30 tons per acre (dried to 15% moisture) every year. Cattle love it (it must contain some sugar) but, it is high in silica uptake and bad for their tummies. Glass Roots? :-) Regards, Frederick > > Yep, the big bamboo. > > (grin) > > K From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 16 19:31:59 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2H3VrOT023111; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 19:31:53 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2H3VoO0023088; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 19:31:50 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 19:31:50 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f From: Baronvolsung aol.com Message-ID: <15a.30280451.2d8920a0 aol.com> Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 22:31:44 EST Subject: German scientists prove information travels faster than light to view future! To: vortex-l eskimo.com, Roundtable7@yahoogroups.com, a-albionic yahoogroups.com CC: Baronvolsung aol.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1079494304" X-Mailer: 9.0 for Windows sub 5007 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53575 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: -------------------------------1079494304 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Scalar Waves written by Konstantin Meyl shows that the transmission of information at speeds faster than light with photons, microwaves, and laser beams has been proven at the University of Berkley, Cologne Germany, and Vienna. When information travels faster than light it is received before it is sent out. If we send information to ourselves by means of satellites at faster than light speeds, we can see the information before we send it on our receivers, which means we can look into the future, once we get our communications networks set up properly. The speed of energy or scalar waves can travel faster than the speed of light by means of Tesla scalar waves also. Baron Von Volsung, www.rhfweb.com\baron, Email: www.rhfweb.com\emailform.html President Thomas D. Clark, Email: www.rhfweb.com\emailform.html, Personal Web Page: www.rhfweb.com\personal New Age Production's Inc., www.rhfweb.com\newage Star Haven Community Services, at www.rhfweb.com\sh Radiation Health Foundation Trust at www.rhfweb.com -------------------------------1079494304 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Scalar Waves written by Konstantin Meyl shows that the transmission of=20= information at speeds faster than light with photons, microwaves, and laser=20= beams has been proven at the University of Berkley, Cologne Germany, and Vie= nna.  When information travels faster than light it is received before=20= it is sent out.  If we send information to ourselves by means of satell= ites at faster than light speeds, we can see the information before we send=20= it on our receivers, which means we can look into the future, once we get ou= r communications networks set up properly.  The speed of energy or scal= ar waves can travel faster than the speed of light by means of Tesla scalar=20= waves also.
 

Baron Von Volsung, www.rhfweb.com\baron, Email: w= ww.rhfweb.com\emailform.html
President Thomas D. Clark,
Email: www.rhfweb.com\emailform.html, Personal Web Page: = www.rhfweb.com\personal
New Age Production's Inc., www.rhfweb.com\n= ewage
Star Haven Community Services, at www.rhfweb.com\sh
Radiation=20= Health Foundation Trust at www.rhfweb.com
-------------------------------1079494304-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 16 19:40:23 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2H3eFOT025678; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 19:40:16 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2H3eEl3025663; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 19:40:14 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 19:40:14 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <20040317034013.41147.qmail web41509.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 19:40:13 -0800 (PST) From: Harvey Norris Subject: Electrolysis Reseacher Stumbles into Ferrite Heating Anomaly. To: vortex-l eskimo.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53576 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Erstwhile Water Researcher, Harvey D Norris, when released from incarceration some time ago in 98, then gleaned about internet for his realization, expressed then and still witheld from the common dream, which is a high voltage high frequency water electrolysis, seemingly deceased with Meyer, Puharich and lot of the famous vanished inventors. HDN was using unmagnetised ferrite blocks as the spacers on his electrolysis cells because of convenience of available parts, and his initial belief that these spacers shouldnt be much of a hindrance leakage wise to the water currents. Apparently this may be correct, however HDN encountered a happenstance wanted to test his imagination to the fullest extent shortly to come. Now the rainbow is finished, and new things can be seen. HDN used 3/8 width small ferrite blocs for insulator spacers. These spacing materials were formerly noted with special effects noted with AC, where those effects were thought to be a "pressure effect" that could be shown not only physically, but also electrically. The physical effect was direct mechanical pressure which could give 6 fold amperage and capacity increases, and conversely when a very high resonant voltage potential was placed across the piece, it became more conductive, but at the same time released more heat. This same effect on the DC level borders on MIRACULOUS. The water cell in HDN's 3 phase alternator resonance system is taken as a midpt pathway between a two phase 4 diode rectification of three METR's, maximum energy transfer resonances. The cell testings themselves showed promises, which exactly as puharich dictates, the cell currents are represented as internal tank currents, and this idea gets magnified to a potentially rediculous degree, as the test results show. The accidental discovery HDN has made is that the testing of the spacers at open circuit, showed that the water impregnated ferrite almost immediately exhibited conditioning, or some kind of water relationship existed there. This was because so much heat developed that a meltdown of rubber bands around ferrite spacers to steel rulers developed. Many tests later developed after the inevitable drunk hangovers that happen with making observances like this. So at least a week later, I decide it is for real and make the first enquirees, and to show some evidence... For 4 watts true alternator power delivery, I heat ferrite red hot, by use of METR inputs; this is over the unity barrier. For 12 watts a red speck can be seen, but this is just near over the over unity barrier. The ferrite looses resistance with heat, and the hotter you work, the more the overunity angle. Here I am showing the first evidence of this (reactive) over unity phase angle extraction with a 4 watt extraction, where the 12 watt extraction is 4 times less efficient for energy releases. I was trying some ambient magnetisation techniqes of ferrite, and found that the heat on one trial destroyed my NIB magnetizing influence. Daka, be back later... HDN ===== Tesla Research Group; Pioneering the Applications of Interphasal Resonances http://groups.yahoo.com/group/teslafy/ From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 16 19:44:49 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2H3ifOT029514; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 19:44:41 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2H3icDS029483; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 19:44:38 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 19:44:38 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Authentication-Warning: eskimo.com: billb owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 19:44:40 -0800 (PST) From: William Beaty To: vortex Subject: Re: 1/f fractals and maglev In-Reply-To: <00ca01c40ae3$6495a840$8837fea9 cpq> Message-ID: References: <00ca01c40ae3$6495a840$8837fea9 cpq> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Resent-Message-ID: <1vhm2D.A.nMH.mm8VAB ultra5.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53577 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Another source of energy is the 60Hz "tesla wave" transmitted by the USA power grid. I've seen articles which point out that the 60Hz b-field is strong even many tens of miles away from any power lines. But you need a a near-infinite-Q 60Hz resonant antenna if you want to grab much energy. I had a brainstorm. An extremely high-Q RLC resonator requires superconductors. But a DC supercondutive loop resembles a permanent magnet. What happens when you SPIN a permanent magnet end over end? It acts like a crossed pair of superconductor resonators. The Q isn't infinite because the spinning magnet rides on bearings and it stirs the air. ...unless the air is removed. Unless the magnet is levitated! Combine the ideas and you end up with a "Levitron(tm)" that's designed to run best at 3600 rpm (60Hz) in a vacuum chamber. Perhaps its spinner needs a crosswise-oriented dipolar field to couple with ambient 60Hz RF waves, as well as the vertical field that keeps it suspended. Need to keep all iron away (iron or any material that's lossy for 60Hz b-fields.) In theory, anywhere on Earth this device can lock onto the local 60Hz magnetic field which is the "M" part of the EM standing wave trapped in the earth/ionosphere duct. It will drift into 90deg phase-lag relationship, which takes in X microwatts and broadcasts X/2 microwatts at 60Hz, leaving an additional X/2 microwatts to drive the spinner. Will that be enough? Maybe the spinner, once started, will drift slowly down to 60Hz because of tiny frictional losses, then stop at that frequency... forever. Or at least until humankind stops using land based 60Hz power grids! (((((((((((((((((( ( ( ( ( (O) ) ) ) ) ))))))))))))))))))) William J. Beaty SCIENCE HOBBYIST website billb eskimo.com http://amasci.com EE/programmer/sci-exhibits amateur science, hobby projects, sci fair Seattle, WA 206-789-0775 unusual phenomena, tesla coils, weird sci From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 16 21:00:18 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2H508tl023191; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 21:00:08 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2H505OM023164; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 21:00:05 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 21:00:05 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f From: Keasy aol.com Message-ID: Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 23:59:59 EST Subject: Re: 1/f fractals and maglev To: vortex-l eskimo.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_f2.382dfac8.2d89354f_boundary" X-Mailer: 8.0 for Windows sub 6024 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53578 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: --part1_f2.382dfac8.2d89354f_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 3/16/2004 8:45:55 PM Mountain Standard Time, billb eskimo.com writes: > Combine the ideas and you end up with a "Levitron(tm)" that's designed to > run best at 3600 rpm (60Hz) in a vacuum chamber. Perhaps its spinner > needs a crosswise-oriented dipolar field to couple with ambient 60Hz RF > waves, as well as the vertical field that keeps it suspended. Need to > keep all iron away (iron or any material that's lossy for 60Hz b-fields.) > It certainly seems to me that this would work in principle. A possible problem might be that the power you can get from the 60 Hz fields are pretty low unless you are fairly close to a high current wire. I once had the idea to power a small radio from these fields and did the calculations to see if it was practical. It looked practical, but I couild use a medium area loop of many turns. (Never did the experiment) Ken --part1_f2.382dfac8.2d89354f_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In a message dated 3/16/2004 8:45:5= 5 PM Mountain Standard Time, billb eskimo.com writes:

Combine the ideas and you end=20= up with a "Levitron(tm)" that's designed to
run best at 3600 rpm (60Hz) in a vacuum chamber.  Perhaps its spinner needs a crosswise-oriented dipolar field to couple with ambient 60Hz RF
waves, as well as the vertical field that keeps it suspended.  Need to<= BR> keep all iron away (iron or any material that's lossy for 60Hz b-fields.)


It certainly seems to me that this would work in principle.  A possible=   problem might be that the power you can get from the 60 Hz fields are= pretty low unless you are fairly close to a high current wire.  I once= had the idea to power a small radio from these fields and did the calculati= ons to see if it was practical.  It looked practical, but I couild use=20= a medium area loop of many turns. (Never did the experiment)

            &nbs= p;            &n= bsp;            =             &nbs= p;            &n= bsp;        Ken
--part1_f2.382dfac8.2d89354f_boundary-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Mar 17 00:17:02 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2H8Gt91013491; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 00:16:55 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2H8Gqo7013468; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 00:16:52 -0800 Resent-Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 00:16:52 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-Id: <2.2.32.20040317081457.0069e570 pop.freeserve.net> X-Sender: grimer2.freeserve.co.uk pop.freeserve.net X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 2.2 (32) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 08:14:57 +0000 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Grimer Subject: Re: 1/f fractals and maglev Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53579 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: At 07:44 pm 16-03-04 -0800, you wrote: > >Another source of energy is the 60Hz "tesla wave" transmitted by the USA >power grid. I've seen articles which point out that the 60Hz b-field is >strong even many tens of miles away from any power lines. But you need a >a near-infinite-Q 60Hz resonant antenna if you want to grab much energy. >I had a brainstorm. > >An extremely high-Q RLC resonator requires superconductors. But a DC >supercondutive loop resembles a permanent magnet. What happens when you >SPIN a permanent magnet end over end? It acts like a crossed pair of >superconductor resonators. The Q isn't infinite because the spinning >magnet rides on bearings and it stirs the air. ...unless the air is >removed. Unless the magnet is levitated! > >Combine the ideas and you end up with a "Levitron(tm)" that's designed to >run best at 3600 rpm (60Hz) in a vacuum chamber. Perhaps its spinner >needs a crosswise-oriented dipolar field to couple with ambient 60Hz RF >waves, as well as the vertical field that keeps it suspended. Need to >keep all iron away (iron or any material that's lossy for 60Hz b-fields.) > >In theory, anywhere on Earth this device can lock onto the local 60Hz >magnetic field which is the "M" part of the EM standing wave trapped in >the earth/ionosphere duct. It will drift into 90deg phase-lag >relationship, which takes in X microwatts and broadcasts X/2 microwatts at >60Hz, leaving an additional X/2 microwatts to drive the spinner. Will >that be enough? Maybe the spinner, once started, will drift slowly down >to 60Hz because of tiny frictional losses, then stop at that frequency... >forever. Or at least until humankind stops using land based 60Hz power >grids! Isn't there one slight snag to this scheme. You would be drawing power from the grid and, in theory at least, you could be sued by the electricity company/ies. I seem to remember reading about some Brit who lived under high transmission lines and lit up their house by means of a coil wound around it. He was prosecuted for theft since the law does not distinguish between conduction and induction. ;-) Cheers Frank Grimer From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Mar 17 02:25:18 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2HAPD1m018697; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 02:25:13 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2HAPBTT018687; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 02:25:11 -0800 Resent-Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 02:25:11 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <003601c40c01$5b9357a0$8888b341 computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: Subject: Re: Floating Energy Plantations Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 03:21:05 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-ELNK-Trace: 0b1c9d71006e06a171639b933de7ae6f7e972de0d01da940ad757003fd45bf4cff1735c35c2c2002350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c Resent-Message-ID: <0j8J5B.A.7jE.HeCWAB ultra5.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53580 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: According to the Brazilian article below, a certain strain of sugarcane can produce 72 tons of biomass per acre-year. I think the "False Bamboo" that grows around here is related and like sugarcane, fixes it's own nitrogen too. With about 40% fixed carbon, the equivalent of 28 tons of coal per acre-year can be grown. Since we can't use Brazil's tropical land/Rain Forests, hectare-sized floating "bubble-wrap" barges filled with a few feet of topsoil, equipped with Photo-Voltaic powered reverse osmosis equipment deployed to the tropics, would make for portable energy plantations. OTOH, Dubya could have the navy put a few feet of topsoil on the deck of an aircraft carrier and deploy it to Haiti for a year. http://www.paulnoll.com/China/Metric/number-acres.html http://www.embrapa.br/english/techno/sugarcan.htm "Sugarcane is capable of taking from the air the nitrogen needed for its development.This takes place through the association established with nitrogen fixing bacteria. The most promising cultivars, CB 45-3 and SP 70-1143, can produce up to 180t/ha - or three times the national average in soils of very low fertility, without nitrogenous fertilization. In this case, investments for nitrogenous fertilization can be utilized for irrigation and complementing micro-nutrients (molybdenum), making the growing of sugarcane even more economical and energy efficient." Regards, Frederick From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Mar 17 05:36:15 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2HDaA1m029677; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 05:36:11 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2HDZixo029531; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 05:35:44 -0800 Resent-Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 05:35:44 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Reply-To: From: "Keith Nagel" To: "Vortex" Subject: Need I say More??? Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 09:01:14 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Importance: Normal X-Rcpt-To: Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53581 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: A http://www.theonion.com/news/index.php?i=1&n=3 K. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Mar 17 07:57:36 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2HFvI1m002970; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 07:57:19 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2HFvHch002953; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 07:57:17 -0800 Resent-Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 07:57:17 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f From: FZNIDARSIC aol.com Message-ID: <8d.603648c.2d89cf51 aol.com> Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 10:57:05 EST Subject: take the cold fusion test To: vortex-l eskimo.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_8d.603648c.2d89cf51_boundary" X-Mailer: 7.0 for Windows sub 10712 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53582 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: --part1_8d.603648c.2d89cf51_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I used an image map to vector the questions to right and wrong html pages. I employed the browser cookie to keep score. I added wav sounds and gif pictures. It's a little slow on dial up lines. The 2d time through, after the pictures and sounds are downloaded, through it runs faster. The whole thing was done in HTML with not special software. You can do this to. http://www.angelfire.com/scifi2/zpt/test.html enjoy Frank Znidarsic --part1_8d.603648c.2d89cf51_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I used an image map to vector the q= uestions to right and wrong html pages.
I employed the browser cookie to keep score.  I added wav sounds and gi= f pictures.
It's a little slow on dial up lines.  The 2d time through, after the pi= ctures and sounds are downloaded, through it runs faster.  The whole th= ing was done in HTML with not special software.  You can do this to.
http://www.angelfire.com/scifi2/zpt/test.html

enjoy 

Frank Znidarsic
--part1_8d.603648c.2d89cf51_boundary-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Mar 17 09:35:17 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2HHZ21m017947; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 09:35:02 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2HHYsPs017855; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 09:34:54 -0800 Resent-Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 09:34:54 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f From: John Fields To: vortex-l eskimo.com Cc: vortex-l eskimo.com, Roundtable7@yahoogroups.com, a-albionic yahoogroups.com, Baronvolsung@aol.com Subject: Re: German scientists prove information travels faster than light to view future! Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 11:34:34 -0600 Organization: Austin Instruments, Inc. Message-ID: References: <15a.30280451.2d8920a0 aol.com> In-Reply-To: <15a.30280451.2d8920a0 aol.com> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ultra5.eskimo.com id i2HHYh1m017771 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53583 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 22:31:44 EST, you wrote: >Scalar Waves written by Konstantin Meyl shows that the transmission of >information at speeds faster than light with photons, microwaves, and laser beams >has been proven at the University of Berkley, Cologne Germany, and Vienna. When >information travels faster than light it is received before it is sent out. --- No, it isn't. It would be merely be received in less time than it would take if it was being transmitted conventionally. --- >If we send information to ourselves by means of satellites at faster than >light speeds, we can see the information before we send it on our receivers, which >means we can look into the future, once we get our communications networks >set up properly. --- No it doesn't. All it means is we would receive the information more quickly than if it were transmitted by conventional means. --- >The speed of energy or scalar waves can travel faster than the >speed of light by means of Tesla scalar waves also. --- Perhaps, put I don't think a transmitter-receiver pair has yet been built which proves that superluminal communications has been achieved. -- John Fields From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Mar 17 17:33:37 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2I1XUAu011805; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 17:33:32 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2I1W7ma010796; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 17:32:07 -0800 Resent-Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 17:32:07 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <4058FBF4.5040908 cox.net> Disposition-Notification-To: "Hoyt A. Stearns Jr." Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 18:31:32 -0700 From: "Hoyt A. Stearns Jr." Organization: ISUS User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: 1/f fractals and maglev References: <2.2.32.20040317081457.0069e570 pop.freeserve.net> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------000000010209070107030001" Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53584 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: --------------000000010209070107030001 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Grimer wrote: >>In theory, anywhere on Earth this device can lock onto the local 60Hz >>magnetic field which is the "M" part of the EM standing wave trapped in >>the earth/ionosphere duct. It will drift into 90deg phase-lag >>relationship, which takes in X microwatts and broadcasts X/2 microwatts at >>60Hz, leaving an additional X/2 microwatts to drive the spinner. Will >>that be enough? Maybe the spinner, once started, will drift slowly down >>to 60Hz because of tiny frictional losses, then stop at that frequency... >>forever. Or at least until humankind stops using land based 60Hz power >>grids! >> >> > > >Isn't there one slight snag to this scheme. You would be drawing power >from the grid and, in theory at least, you could be sued by the >electricity company/ies. > >I seem to remember reading about some Brit who lived under high transmission >lines and lit up their house by means of a coil wound around it. He was >prosecuted for theft since the law does not distinguish between conduction >and induction. ;-) > >Cheers > >Frank Grimer > But it could be to the power company's advantage. There was a trick question in engineering school about how a farmer could extract power from the power lines, and save the power company money at the same time: If the power lines go around the edge of the farmer's land, and he attaches a conductor at each corner and uses the energy due to the voltage difference from one corner to the other, he's still lowering the losses in the transmission lines. (parallel path for the current). Similarly, it may be that transmission losses occur whether one extracts the energy or not. Hoyt Stearns Scottsdale, Arizona > > > > --------------000000010209070107030001 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Grimer wrote:
In theory, anywhere on Earth this device can lock onto the local 60Hz
magnetic field which is the "M" part of the EM standing wave trapped in
the earth/ionosphere duct. It will drift into 90deg phase-lag
relationship, which takes in X microwatts and broadcasts X/2 microwatts at
60Hz, leaving an additional X/2 microwatts to drive the spinner.  Will
that be enough?  Maybe the spinner, once started, will drift slowly down
to 60Hz because of tiny frictional losses, then stop at that frequency...
forever.  Or at least until humankind stops using land based 60Hz power
grids!
    


Isn't there one slight snag to this scheme. You would be drawing power
from the grid and, in theory at least, you could be sued by the 
electricity company/ies.  <g>

I seem to remember reading about some Brit who lived under high transmission
lines and lit up their house by means of a coil wound around it. He was
prosecuted for theft since the law does not distinguish between conduction
and induction.   ;-)

Cheers

Frank Grimer

But it could be to the power company's advantage.  There was a  trick question in engineering school
about how a farmer could extract power from the power lines, and save the power company money at the same time:

If the power lines go around the edge of the farmer's land, and he attaches a conductor at each corner and uses the energy
due to the voltage difference from one corner to the other, he's still lowering the losses in the transmission lines.
(parallel path for the current).  Similarly, it may be that transmission losses occur whether one extracts the energy or not.


Hoyt Stearns
Scottsdale, Arizona


  

--------------000000010209070107030001-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Mar 17 18:28:16 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2I2SCAu004130; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 18:28:12 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2I2QobU003001; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 18:26:50 -0800 Resent-Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 18:26:50 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <006e01c40c90$77ec1100$6401a8c0 Craig> From: "SnowDog" To: Subject: Hematite! Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 20:26:49 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53585 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: They've identified the blueberries as hematite. http://www.space.com/missionlaunches/mars_blueberries_040317.html More evidence for water... Craig From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Mar 17 19:26:47 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2I3QfAu025283; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 19:26:42 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2I3PKRL024513; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 19:25:20 -0800 Resent-Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 19:25:20 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <000501c40c98$9e3963a0$4b58ccd1 MIKEBY3NR533HT> From: "Mike Carrell" To: References: <006e01c40c90$77ec1100$6401a8c0 Craig> Subject: Re: Hematite! NOMENCLATURE ALERT Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 22:25:02 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Resent-Message-ID: <2pgaqB.A.9-F.gaRWAB ultra5.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53586 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Craig wrote: > They've identified the blueberries as hematite. > > http://www.space.com/missionlaunches/mars_blueberries_040317.html > > More evidence for water... > > Craig ---------------------- That's fine, but there are other spherical objects discussed here which I and others have called 'blueberries' for want of a better name. These are very definitely *not* what are illustrated in the linked article as heamtite. In no way will hematiite spheres match the characteristics seen in some of the images, like growing on a stalk. We need another name, else we may slip into the illusion that those objects have been 'explained' which is definitely not the case. Mike Carrell From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Mar 17 20:07:44 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2I47IAu012278; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 20:07:19 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2I47GIo012257; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 20:07:16 -0800 Resent-Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 20:07:16 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f From: Standing Bear To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: German scientists prove information travels faster than light to view future! Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 23:17:03 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <15a.30280451.2d8920a0 aol.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200403172317.03123.rockcast earthlink.net> Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53587 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: On Wednesday 17 March 2004 12:34, John Fields wrote: > On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 22:31:44 EST, you wrote: > >Scalar Waves written by Konstantin Meyl shows that the transmission of > >information at speeds faster than light with photons, microwaves, and > > laser beams has been proven at the University of Berkley, Cologne > > Germany, and Vienna. When information travels faster than light it is > > received before it is sent out. > > --- > No, it isn't. It would be merely be received in less time than it would > take if it was being transmitted conventionally. > --- > > >If we send information to ourselves by means of satellites at faster than > >light speeds, we can see the information before we send it on our > > receivers, which means we can look into the future, once we get our > > communications networks set up properly. > > --- > No it doesn't. All it means is we would receive the information more > quickly than if it were transmitted by conventional means. > --- > > >The speed of energy or scalar waves can travel faster than the > >speed of light by means of Tesla scalar waves also. > > --- > Perhaps, put I don't think a transmitter-receiver pair has yet been > built which proves that superluminal communications has been achieved. May be so, but let us allow him to prove otherwise; and/or anyone else while we are at it. After all, another forgotten group of 'professional skeptics' from another age, the 1940's and before, postulated that man would never conquer the sound barrier. They said we would shake ourselves apart. After the goal was reached, all the voices of fashionable skepticism faded into the woodwork and into the night never to be seen or heard from again. It was no longer possible to keep ones job or grant or take another's away from them by spouting dogma. Quite the opposite as the cold light of new truth drove the Phillistines out of at least THAT temple. If we are to avoid a new dark age of feudalism and exploitation of man by man, we will need these people that dare to think 'out of the box' as Marc Millis put it while he was in charge of the late 'breakthrough physics' group. Otherwise we are fated to be thrown back on ourselves and into a world of limited resource and no hope. The earth is a big place, but we are a big race and outgrowing our womb. We need to be able to reach out. First to our local system for more resources and energy, then to other local star systems. Out there are virtually limitless resources, and we are only now beginning to attain the enabling technologies to be able to exploit them. Out there also are isolated spaces in which to test ideas and technologies that may be hazardous on our home world. Granted new ideas are messy. And dangerous on occasion! But human progress is charted on an eneven course of odd milestones. The simple invention of a new process for waterproof cement for mortar to proof stone walls against hydraulic pressure enabled the city to New York to become the metropolis it is today. The waterproof walls enabled canal locks on the Erie Canal to be built economically from local materials. This led to an explosion of commerce that made New York City its hub. Another such new idea is the space elevator. Just think of what a long fiber nanotube will enable if an when it can lower delivered pound of cargo to high earth orbit or interplanetary transit....from 10,000 dollars a pound to 10 dollars a pound. Or think of what a MITEE engine of an output similar to a Russian Proton rocket could do to transform the Russian Buran design LEO shuttle into a true space shuttle with interplanetary capabilities in a single stage. It WILL be done. If not by us, then by the Chinese. Who then will truly be more fit to lead the human race to greatness. Standing Bear From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Mar 17 22:47:03 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2I6kjAu031389; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 22:46:46 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2I6kivY031371; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 22:46:44 -0800 Resent-Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 22:46:44 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f From: Baronvolsung aol.com Message-ID: <8e.6121260.2d8a9fcf aol.com> Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 01:46:39 EST Subject: Re: Floating Energy Plantations To: vortex-l eskimo.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1079592399" X-Mailer: 9.0 for Windows sub 5007 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53588 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: -------------------------------1079592399 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Thank you for this post. Baron Von Volsung, www.rhfweb.com\baron, Email: www.rhfweb.com\emailform.html President Thomas D. Clark, Email: www.rhfweb.com\emailform.html, Personal Web Page: www.rhfweb.com\personal New Age Production's Inc., www.rhfweb.com\newage Star Haven Community Services, at www.rhfweb.com\sh Radiation Health Foundation Trust at www.rhfweb.com -------------------------------1079592399 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thank you for this post.
 

Baron Von Volsung, www.rhfweb.com\baron, Email: w= ww.rhfweb.com\emailform.html
President Thomas D. Clark,
Email: www.rhfweb.com\emailform.html, Personal Web Page: = www.rhfweb.com\personal
New Age Production's Inc., www.rhfweb.com\n= ewage
Star Haven Community Services, at www.rhfweb.com\sh
Radiation=20= Health Foundation Trust at www.rhfweb.com
-------------------------------1079592399-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Mar 17 22:47:04 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2I6koAu031425; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 22:46:50 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2I6knVR031412; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 22:46:49 -0800 Resent-Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 22:46:49 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f From: Baronvolsung aol.com Message-ID: Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 01:46:41 EST Subject: Re: German scientists prove information travels faster than light to view fut... To: vortex-l eskimo.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1079592401" X-Mailer: 9.0 for Windows sub 5007 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53589 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: -------------------------------1079592401 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 3/17/2004 1:22:38 AM Eastern Standard Time, Lucky artsound.com writes: The problem with time. Everything in the universe is a phase and phases switch. Hence also time is a phase. I think it is a mistake to think of time only from our below speed of light aspect of our physical body. As a human I am body and spirit. In effect the direction of time works the other way around (otherway phase direction) when the speed is higher then that of light. If we call the direction of our physical senses from past to future, then when the energy oscilates a the speed higher than that of light the time direction is the otherway around, hence from future to the past. This is why vision and spiritual things work from the future to the past in the form of intuition and sometimes prophecy. I wouldn't call this time travel though. Furthermore I assume that everything in the universe is circular hence also the directions of time in the physical and non physical world might switch at some stage. A period like that I like to call Aeon. I don't think this is time travel, although it might be that at the point in phaseswitch where the body's and spirit;s time experience converge it might be possible to travel to another convergion point. Alas, this is all difficult matter and John Dee was sentenced to death by the Jesuit Cardinal Bellardin, after he had stripped him of all information regarding this though.... Baron Von Volsung, www.rhfweb.com\baron, Email: www.rhfweb.com\emailform.html President Thomas D. Clark, Email: www.rhfweb.com\emailform.html, Personal Web Page: www.rhfweb.com\personal New Age Production's Inc., www.rhfweb.com\newage Star Haven Community Services, at www.rhfweb.com\sh Radiation Health Foundation Trust at www.rhfweb.com -------------------------------1079592401 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In a message dated 3/17/2004 1:22:38 AM Eastern Standard Time, Lucky ar= tsound.com writes:
The problem with time. Everything in=20= the universe is a phase and phases switch. Hence also time is a phase. I thi= nk it is a mistake to think of time only from our below speed of light aspec= t of our physical body. As a human I am body and spirit. In effect the direc= tion of time works the other way around (otherway phase direction) when the=20= speed is higher then that of light. If we call the direction of our physical= senses from past to future, then when the energy oscilates a the speed high= er than that of light the time direction is the otherway around, hence from=20= future to the past. This is why vision and spiritual things work from the fu= ture to the past in the form of intuition and sometimes prophecy. I wouldn't= call this time travel though.
Furthermore I assume that everything in th= e universe is circular hence also the directions of time in the physical and= non physical world might switch at some stage. A period like that I like to= call Aeon. I don't think this is time travel, although it might be that at=20= the point in phaseswitch where the body's and spirit;s time experience conve= rge it might be possible to travel to another convergion point. Alas, this i= s all difficult matter and John Dee was sentenced to death by the Jesuit Car= dinal Bellardin, after he had stripped him of all information regarding this= though....
 

Baron Von Volsung, www.rhfweb.com\baron, Email: w= ww.rhfweb.com\emailform.html
President Thomas D. Clark,
Email: www.rhfweb.com\emailform.html, Personal Web Page: = www.rhfweb.com\personal
New Age Production's Inc., www.rhfweb.com\n= ewage
Star Haven Community Services, at www.rhfweb.com\sh
Radiation=20= Health Foundation Trust at www.rhfweb.com
-------------------------------1079592401-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Mar 18 00:04:56 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2I84fMt024051; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 00:04:42 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2I84ewd024037; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 00:04:40 -0800 Resent-Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 00:04:40 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Authentication-Warning: eskimo.com: billb owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 00:04:48 -0800 (PST) From: William Beaty To: Vortex Subject: Re: Need I say More??? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53590 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: On Wed, 17 Mar 2004, Keith Nagel wrote: > http://www.theonion.com/news/index.php?i=1&n=3 OK, I have a TV antenna taped to my head. Nothing. Wait. Tinfoil wasn't adjusted right. That's better. Something's coming... It looks like tinfoil hats are misguided; it's iron foil or mu-metal hats that you need. Here's the .pdf of the paper recently published at the UW: 60Hz b-fields break neuronal DNA, kill brain cells, effect is halted with melatonin, vitamin-E or iron chelation http://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/members/2004/6355/6355.pdf About the photos and the DNA-break assay method http://www.electric-words.com/cell/electaus/electrophoresis.html And various articles: http://www.google.com/search?q=%2Bsingh+%2Blai+%2Bwashington+%2Bfields (((((((((((((((((( ( ( ( ( (O) ) ) ) ) ))))))))))))))))))) William J. Beaty SCIENCE HOBBYIST website billb eskimo.com http://amasci.com EE/programmer/sci-exhibits amateur science, hobby projects, sci fair Seattle, WA 206-789-0775 unusual phenomena, tesla coils, weird sci From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Mar 18 02:12:36 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2IACTiF001918; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 02:12:29 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2IACSw8001904; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 02:12:28 -0800 Resent-Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 02:12:28 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-Id: <2.2.32.20040318101035.006b8110 pop.freeserve.net> X-Sender: grimer2.freeserve.co.uk pop.freeserve.net X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 2.2 (32) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 10:10:35 +0000 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Grimer Subject: Re: 1/f fractals and maglev Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53591 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 06:31 pm 17-03-04 -0700, you wrote: > > >Grimer wrote: > >>>In theory, anywhere on Earth this device can lock onto the local 60Hz >>>magnetic field which is the "M" part of the EM standing wave trapped in >>>the earth/ionosphere duct. It will drift into 90deg phase-lag >>>relationship, which takes in X microwatts and broadcasts X/2 microwatts at >>>60Hz, leaving an additional X/2 microwatts to drive the spinner. Will >>>that be enough? Maybe the spinner, once started, will drift slowly down >>>to 60Hz because of tiny frictional losses, then stop at that frequency... >>>forever. Or at least until humankind stops using land based 60Hz power >>>grids! >>> >>> >> >> >>Isn't there one slight snag to this scheme. You would be drawing power >>from the grid and, in theory at least, you could be sued by the >>electricity company/ies. >> >>I seem to remember reading about some Brit who lived under high transmission >>lines and lit up their house by means of a coil wound around it. He was >>prosecuted for theft since the law does not distinguish between conduction >>and induction. ;-) >> >>Cheers >> >>Frank Grimer >> > >But it could be to the power company's advantage. There was a trick >question in engineering school >about how a farmer could extract power from the power lines, and save >the power company money at the same time: > >If the power lines go around the edge of the farmer's land, and he >attaches a conductor at each corner and uses the energy >due to the voltage difference from one corner to the other, he's still >lowering the losses in the transmission lines. >(parallel path for the current). Similarly, it may be that transmission >losses occur whether one extracts the energy or not. > > >Hoyt Stearns >Scottsdale, Arizona I'll take your word for it since that's way above my head 8-) When I was in first year Civils we were doing a practical on a series wound motor. I noticed that the ammeter was connected up the wrong way round and the pointer was winding back hard against the stop. I disconnected it in order to connect it the right way BIG BLUE FLASH. MOTOR START TO RAPIDLY ACCELERATE. LECTURER LEAPS FOR THE OFF SWITCH. He explained later to a very shocked student that if he hadn't the motor would have accelerated to destruction and pieces of student would be flying all around the lab. After that they only let me hold the thingee that measures rotor speed. :-( And I have been very wary of all things electrical ever since ;-) Cheers Frank From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Mar 18 06:51:24 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2IEpE59002396; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 06:51:14 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2IEoitT002166; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 06:50:44 -0800 Resent-Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 06:50:44 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <003201c40cf8$3e4a5ca0$8837fea9 cpq> From: "Jones Beene" To: "vortex" References: <2.2.32.20040318101035.006b8110 pop.freeserve.net> Subject: Re: 1/f fractals and maglev Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 06:49:40 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ultra6.eskimo.com id i2IEob59002087 Resent-Message-ID: <1aG_xB.A.vh.DdbWAB ultra6.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53592 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Frank, > When I was in first year Civils we were doing a practical on a series > wound motor. I noticed that the ammeter was connected up the > wrong way round and the pointer was winding back hard against > the stop. I disconnected it in order to connect it the right way > > BIG BLUE FLASH. A brief flash that could add new meaning to the term 'short circuit'... eh? ...or as you Brit's are wont to say, "fouling one's knickers"... actually, by now we yanks have likely corrupted the language enough that you can even get our lame puns... Jones From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Mar 18 07:43:17 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2IFh1O8015561; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 07:43:05 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2IFgxMV015549; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 07:42:59 -0800 Resent-Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 07:42:59 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-Id: <2.2.32.20040318154055.006bdf30 pop.freeserve.net> X-Sender: grimer2.freeserve.co.uk pop.freeserve.net X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 2.2 (32) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 15:40:55 +0000 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Grimer Subject: Re: 1/f fractals and maglev Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53593 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 06:49 am 18-03-04 -0800, you wrote: >Frank, > >> When I was in first year Civils we were doing a practical on a series >> wound motor. I noticed that the ammeter was connected up the >> wrong way round and the pointer was winding back hard against >> the stop. I disconnected it in order to connect it the right way >> >> BIG BLUE FLASH. > > >A brief flash that could add new meaning to the term 'short circuit'... eh? > >...or as you Brit's are wont to say, "fouling one's knickers"... actually, by now we yanks have likely corrupted the language enough that you can even get our lame puns... > >Jones LOL Actually, I have never heard the expression "fouling one's knickers", but then I went to an all boys school and had 3 brothers, no sisters - so I wouldn't have. It sounds to me like the argot of posh girls' boarding schools, like Roedean. In my schooldays the expression was "messing one's pants" pants being the under garment, not the over garment. [US pants = UK trousers] but I expect in this uncouth era thanks to the deplorable influence of the US film industry, a boy would say, "I shit myself" ;-) As for the pun, I get the brief flash bit ....but don't explain the rest - please! Where ignorance is bliss..... ;-) Frank From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Mar 18 08:09:44 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2IG9XO8032167; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 08:09:33 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2IG9Vpn032145; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 08:09:31 -0800 Resent-Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 08:09:31 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f From: Standing Bear To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: take the cold fusion test Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 11:19:24 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <8d.603648c.2d89cf51 aol.com> In-Reply-To: <8d.603648c.2d89cf51 aol.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200403181119.24066.rockcast earthlink.net> Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53594 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: On Wednesday 17 March 2004 10:57, FZNIDARSIC aol.com wrote: > I used an image map to vector the questions to right and wrong html pages. > I employed the browser cookie to keep score. I added wav sounds and gif > pictures. > It's a little slow on dial up lines. The 2d time through, after the > pictures and sounds are downloaded, through it runs faster. The whole > thing was done in HTML with not special software. You can do this to. > > http://www.angelfire.com/scifi2/zpt/test.html > > enjoy > > Frank Znidarsic Took the test; did fine; learned a few things. The comment about CETI was very interesting. A little searching turned up a site saying that the CETI folks showed up at a show in 1995 with their CF device (or hydrogen device as the Japanese call it now). The page claimed an output in excess of 1000 watts for a 10 watt input. The CF test said that the device had an overunity output of 1000 watts or more for a 90 watt input. Still impressive. However I was worried when I found that the page was many years old... from about 1995...., and I had not heard about that device since. I only got the test question right because of guessing. Went googling and found the only Clean Energy Technologies Inc in the country right now has a phone number of 1-775-823-9889 and may be in Nevada, not in Houston Texas. A little more googling turned up the company not in the United States but instead in Korea, South Korea. This company has a web site and it is: http://www.ceti-fuelcell.com/main.php The page is in Korean but the site has an English translation available. The company uses the name and is in the fuel cell business. I am not sure that they are or are not doing CF though. Pages load better in Konqueror as the site appears not to like Mozilla for some reason--links are not clickable. Maybe just a glitch. Be too bad if they had sank out of sight. Standing Bear From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Mar 18 08:18:42 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2IGIRO8005325; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 08:18:28 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2IGIQR0005307; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 08:18:26 -0800 Resent-Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 08:18:26 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Reply-To: From: "Don Wiegel" To: Subject: RE: Need I say More??? Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 09:18:17 -0700 Message-ID: <000201c40d04$a00e0480$0100a8c0 DonWLap> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ultra5.eskimo.com id i2IGIOO8005258 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53595 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: A subject Vortex is familiar with: The question of replication http://www.electric-words.com/cell/electaus/electrophoresis3.html "How objective can a scientist be, when Motorola funds the research, uses confidentiality agreements, and has lawyers following them to conferences to maintain confidentiality?" >From Dr Roti Roti's personal home page in late 1998: | -----Original Message----- | From: William Beaty [mailto:billb eskimo.com] | Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 1:05 AM | To: Vortex | Subject: Re: Need I say More??? | | On Wed, 17 Mar 2004, Keith Nagel wrote: | | > http://www.theonion.com/news/index.php?i=1&n=3 | | OK, I have a TV antenna taped to my head. Nothing. | | Wait. Tinfoil wasn't adjusted right. That's better. Something's | coming... | | It looks like tinfoil hats are misguided; it's iron foil or mu-metal hats | that you need. Here's the .pdf of the paper recently published at the UW: | | 60Hz b-fields break neuronal DNA, kill brain cells, effect is | halted with melatonin, vitamin-E or iron chelation | http://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/members/2004/6355/6355.pdf | | About the photos and the DNA-break assay method | http://www.electric-words.com/cell/electaus/electrophoresis.html | | And various articles: | | | http://www.google.com/search?q=%2Bsingh+%2Blai+%2Bwashington+%2Bfi | elds | | | | | (((((((((((((((((( ( ( ( ( (O) ) ) ) ) ))))))))))))))))))) | William J. Beaty SCIENCE HOBBYIST website | billb eskimo.com http://amasci.com | EE/programmer/sci-exhibits amateur science, hobby projects, sci fair | Seattle, WA 206-789-0775 unusual phenomena, tesla coils, weird sci From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Mar 18 08:50:54 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2IGoNO8017780; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 08:50:23 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2IGoIpt017720; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 08:50:18 -0800 Resent-Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 08:50:18 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Reply-To: From: "Keith Nagel" To: Subject: RE: Need I say More??? Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 12:15:36 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal X-Rcpt-To: Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53596 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Hi Bill. There, but for the grace of the angels, go I... You know, when Sutton first published his work on the "black hole antenna" I built a copy to experiment with. ( great stuff on modern superregenerative design, if other Vo's are unfamiliar go to NASA and get the papers ). Working in the lab, I was not surprised to find myself saturated with 60Hz radiation. So I packed up the gear, and headed into the middle of a state park. There, amidst a herd of especially curious deer, I set up shop and was _quite_ surprised to again find substantial 60Hz field. I remember the choice of 60Hz was related to Teslas desire to broadcast power, the freq being roughly in line with an earth resonant mode. Which I guess is my problem with 60Hz medical claims; the entire earth has been a lab for this over the past ~75 years. The effect must be very small, if at all, or we'd all be dead? So I was out in this park making measurements, and I'm using a true RMS meter to monitor the output of the device. Suddenly I notice a huge spike on output power. "What the hell??? Here it comes again!" I rushed to the car to grab a pair of headphones, lacking a scope to characterize the signal. Imagine my dismay when I plugged in and heard a gravelly voice proclaim, "Breaker one nine, I got me a Smokey on Rt. 17 northbound" K. -----Original Message----- From: William Beaty [mailto:billb eskimo.com] Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 3:05 AM To: Vortex Subject: Re: Need I say More??? On Wed, 17 Mar 2004, Keith Nagel wrote: > http://www.theonion.com/news/index.php?i=1&n=3 OK, I have a TV antenna taped to my head. Nothing. Wait. Tinfoil wasn't adjusted right. That's better. Something's coming... It looks like tinfoil hats are misguided; it's iron foil or mu-metal hats that you need. Here's the .pdf of the paper recently published at the UW: 60Hz b-fields break neuronal DNA, kill brain cells, effect is halted with melatonin, vitamin-E or iron chelation http://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/members/2004/6355/6355.pdf About the photos and the DNA-break assay method http://www.electric-words.com/cell/electaus/electrophoresis.html And various articles: http://www.google.com/search?q=%2Bsingh+%2Blai+%2Bwashington+%2Bfields (((((((((((((((((( ( ( ( ( (O) ) ) ) ) ))))))))))))))))))) William J. Beaty SCIENCE HOBBYIST website billb eskimo.com http://amasci.com EE/programmer/sci-exhibits amateur science, hobby projects, sci fair Seattle, WA 206-789-0775 unusual phenomena, tesla coils, weird sci From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Mar 18 09:24:18 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2IHOF7k028408; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 09:24:15 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2IHOCZm028390; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 09:24:12 -0800 Resent-Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 09:24:12 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <001a01c40d0e$4c6e0b40$c864a8c0 win98> From: To: References: <006e01c40c90$77ec1100$6401a8c0 Craig> Subject: Re: Hematite! Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 19:11:59 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53597 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: "Hematite as a major compositional phase in the spherules supports their formation via precipitation, rather than as impact-related fallout," Garvin said. Impact-related fallout hypothesis is so poor that, I suspect people that introduce this hypothesis had never examined various images. Formation via precipitation is also poor because, many BB's are grown or developed on the upper edges of rocks, many still in their odd places, and appears they are still developing because their fragile attachments to rocks can not survive millions of years (if the hypothesis require they were developed long time ago, when water was abundant). Pictures also suggest that they are developed and grew by opposing to the gravity, in absence of carrying medium, unless they are lighter than a volatile medium which are not currently present there. ( See sol 49 photos) BB's standing on rock by attachment appears having a preferred direction coinciding to wind direction, also their positions. I dont know how the concluded to hematite, but I think this would be only valid by pre-assumption of inorganic origin. Regards, hamdi ucar " To: Sent: 18 March 2004 04:26 Subject: Hematite! > They've identified the blueberries as hematite. > > http://www.space.com/missionlaunches/mars_blueberries_040317.html > > More evidence for water... > > Craig > > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Mar 18 11:28:09 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2IJS0Rr008371; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 11:28:00 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2IJRwPr008352; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 11:27:58 -0800 Resent-Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 11:27:58 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <002801c40d1f$98218f60$c864a8c0 win98> From: To: Subject: Lot of filaments in Sprit sol73 microscopic images Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 21:16:16 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53598 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: See full size images at pages http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/spirit_m073.html It appears lot of long and short thin filaments embedded in the texture. Texture in turn appears a solidified material impacted by rain drops of something. Solidified material should be thin enough to protect profile of the filaments. Note that these filaments are in smooth shapes, not look like as cracks. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Mar 18 11:43:44 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2IJhEbw013217; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 11:43:18 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2IJhBKG013168; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 11:43:11 -0800 Resent-Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 11:43:11 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <4059FC85.99A691DA ix.netcom.com> Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 11:46:13 -0800 From: Edmund Storms Organization: Energy K System X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77C-CCK-MCD {C-UDP; EBM-APPLE} (Macintosh; U; PPC) X-Accept-Language: en,pdf MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: New Energy Times References: <5.2.0.9.2.20040313160033.00a8af50 mail.dlsi.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53599 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Congratulations, the Cold Fusion Report you and Nadine wrote is excellent. I hope you can get this recognized by a main stream publication so that it can get wide circulation. I predict that once the DOE report is published, editors will be looking for such information. Your effort will be available "just in time". Ed Steve Krivit wrote: > The www.newenergytimes.com website has been updated > > Steven Krivit > Editor and Webmaster > Los Angeles, California, USA From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Mar 18 11:57:13 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2IJv3bw019814; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 11:57:04 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2IJv26f019790; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 11:57:02 -0800 Resent-Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 11:57:02 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.1.4.030702.0 Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 15:00:19 -0500 Subject: DoE to review LENR/CF From: "Eugene F. Mallove" To: "vortex l eskimo.com" Message-ID: Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53600 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: I received this message from Steve Krivit and Nadine Winocur, which I am sure is OK to share on this and other forums: ********************* To the cold fusion community: If you have not heard it already, we have some good news to share: Jacqueline Johnson, a media spokesperson with the U.S.Dept. of Energy confirmed to us yesterday that the D.O.E. has committed to a new review of cold fusion. The effort was initiated by a letter from Peter Hagelstein on Sept. 12, 2003 to Secretary of Energy Spencer Abraham, and a follow-up meeting on November 6, 2003 with Peter, Mike McKubre and Dave Nagel at the D.O.E.. Ms. Johnson was unable to offer a timetable but suggested that one may be available within a few weeks. Three other journalist have also confirmed this information. One is rumored to be reporting it in a major U.S. newspaper tomorrow, the other two journalists told us that they expect their stories to print within 7-12 days. Congratulations to all of you for your efforts over the last 15 years to bring cold fusion back into the public eye and for your contributions to scientific progress, and a better world. We know that a funding fight will ensue, but we hope that between the stronger data that exists, and more organized and directed media attention, cold fusion research will thrive. Sincerely, Steve and Nadine Steven Krivit Nadine Winocur Los Angeles, California, USA www.newenergytimes.com Phone: (310) 721-5919 Fax: (310) 470-8190 ************************** Indeed, I have been aware of this impending review for about a month now and have been in discussion with some of the journalists involved. A position paper about this from the New Energy Foundation will appear in the next few days. Sincerely, Dr. Eugene F. Mallove President, New Energy Foundation, Inc. (A Non-profit, 501(c)(3) Corporation) Editor-in-Chief, Infinite Energy Magazine PO Box 2816 Concord, NH 03302-2816 www.infinite-energy.com editor infinite-energy.com 603-485-4700 Fx: 603-485-4710 From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Mar 18 13:21:38 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2ILLRDC014471; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 13:21:27 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2ILLPZG014454; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 13:21:25 -0800 Resent-Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 13:21:25 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-Id: <6.0.3.0.2.20040318155107.01ce5e10 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell mindspring.com@pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.3.0 Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 16:21:21 -0500 To: vortex-L eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: RE: DoE to review LENR/CF Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53601 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Eugene F. Mallove writes: > If you have not heard it already, we have some good news to share: > > Jacqueline Johnson, a media spokesperson with the U.S.Dept. of Energy > confirmed to us yesterday that the D.O.E. has committed to a new review of > cold fusion. I offer a guarded and hesitant congratulations to all. I hope this is good news, but I fear it may be the case of "be careful what you wish for." I have heard that the enemies of cold fusion are enthusiastic about this review because they plan to use it as a second opportunity to denigrate cold fusion and bury it. They greatly outnumber us, and they have much more political influence, especially within the DOE. It may be a grave mistake to launch a review at the organization in the epicenter of their political power. This is like asking the foxes to review hen-house homeland security measures. This report is scheduled to be completed after the election, for obvious reasons. > We know that a funding fight will > ensue . . . I doubt it! Even in the best of circumstances it will not go that far at the DoE. The best we can hope for is a tepid, mealy-mouthed endorsement of possible future funding at some unspecified government agency. The worst would be a repeat of the ERAB report -- and frankly, that is what I expect to see. Not only is cold fusion impossibly controversial, but you must remember that the government is now in the worst financial crisis it has been in since the Civil War, with outlandish and unsustainable deficits. There will be no new funding for any program for the foreseeable future, until this crisis is resolved. And despite the crisis, entrenched, corrupt programs such as agricultural price supports, hot fusion, and coal and oil subsidies have not been cut; they have been vastly increased. (Indeed, that is one of the causes of the runaway deficits.) There is not the slightest chance the hot fusion or oil lobbyists will allow $1 million, or $1 thousand of their funding to be diverted to cold fusion. Anything who thinks otherwise knows nothing about politics. Hot fusion funding will continue to monopolize every available dollar until the day that all the newspapers magazines and scientific journals features headline articles confirming that cold fusion is real. This is an all or nothing fight. They will not break or surrender one inch of ground until they are destroyed. I base that assessment on the history of similar funding battles in government and industry, in fields such as transportation, computing, telecommunications and energy. Cold fusion will only be funded by private sources of money. It is far too controversial for a mainstream organization such as the DoE or the APS. - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Mar 18 14:45:32 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2IMjKEh016189; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 14:45:24 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2IMjICh016167; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 14:45:18 -0800 Resent-Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 14:45:18 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <000501c40d3b$2d9e5800$c864a8c0 win98> From: To: Cc: References: <002801c40d1f$98218f60$c864a8c0 win98> Subject: Re: Lot of filaments in Sprit sol73 microscopic images Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 00:47:28 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53602 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Note: I had posted previous mail while only 7 pictures were available, now 30. In new pictures of dig sand I located some filaments too. As the soil was heavily disturbed while digging, mineral origin hypothesis of filaments can be ruled out because they had to be broken to small pieces, so they could be better organic or metallic. One filament I saw is in dark color opposed most of them appearing in light color. Overall these microscopic images gives lot of new clues, like the origin of light colored crust covering the soil, which could be a frost or salt buildup when the wet salted soil is dried, leaving salt or other dissolved mineral on the surface. It also appear the soil is still wet inside regarding the dark color and the small particles stick on gravel. It is also very interesting to find rounded gravel, similar to sea shore gravel. One can ask now this gravel took place in wind deposed drift. Maybe not simply wind deposited. Although microscopic images are not stereoscopic, synchronizing my eyes each ones to different picture to same scene gives better resolution and recognizing capability to my brain, despite 3D visuality is absent. This works even when one of the picture is fuzzy! Brain does very good image processing indeed. Regards, hamdi ucar ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Sent: 18 March 2004 21:16 Subject: Lot of filaments in Sprit sol73 microscopic images > See full size images at pages > http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/spirit_m073.html > It appears lot of long and short thin filaments embedded in the texture. Texture > in turn appears a solidified > material impacted by rain drops of something. Solidified material should be thin > enough to protect > profile of the filaments. > > > Note that these filaments are in smooth shapes, not look like as cracks. > > > > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Mar 18 14:59:30 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2IMxBEh021133; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 14:59:12 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2IMx3gn021080; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 14:59:03 -0800 Resent-Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 14:59:03 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f From: John Fields To: vortex-l eskimo.com Cc: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: German scientists prove information travels faster than light to view fut... Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 16:58:42 -0600 Organization: Austin Instruments, Inc. Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ultra5.eskimo.com id i2IMwoEh020944 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53603 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: On Thu, 18 Mar 2004 01:46:41 EST, you wrote: >In a message dated 3/17/2004 1:22:38 AM Eastern Standard Time, >Lucky artsound.com writes: >The problem with time. Everything in the universe is a phase and phases >switch. Hence also time is a phase. I think it is a mistake to think of time only >from our below speed of light aspect of our physical body. As a human I am body >and spirit. In effect the direction of time works the other way around >(otherway phase direction) when the speed is higher then that of light. If we call >the direction of our physical senses from past to future, then when the energy >oscilates a the speed higher than that of light the time direction is the >otherway around, hence from future to the past. This is why vision and spiritual >things work from the future to the past in the form of intuition and sometimes >prophecy. I wouldn't call this time travel though. >Furthermore I assume that everything in the universe is circular hence also >the directions of time in the physical and non physical world might switch at >some stage. A period like that I like to call Aeon. I don't think this is time >travel, although it might be that at the point in phaseswitch where the body's >and spirit;s time experience converge it might be possible to travel to >another convergion point. Alas, this is all difficult matter and John Dee was >sentenced to death by the Jesuit Cardinal Bellardin, after he had stripped him of >all information regarding this though.... --- That's all just opinion. -- John Fields From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Mar 18 15:05:21 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2IN5HbB026923; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 15:05:17 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2IN5EME026905; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 15:05:14 -0800 Resent-Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 15:05:14 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 14:11:02 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: Hematite! Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53604 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 7:11 PM 3/18/4, wrote: >"Hematite as a major compositional phase in the spherules supports >their formation via precipitation, rather than as impact-related fallout," >Garvin said. > >Impact-related fallout hypothesis is so poor that, I suspect people that >introduce this hypothesis had never examined various images. > >Formation via precipitation is also poor because, many BB's are grown >or developed on the upper edges of rocks, many still in their odd places, >and appears they are still developing because their fragile >attachments to rocks can not survive millions of years (if the hypothesis >require they were developed long time ago, when water was abundant). > >Pictures also suggest that they are developed and grew by opposing to >the gravity, in absence of carrying medium, unless they are lighter than a >volatile medium which are not currently present there. ( See sol 49 photos) > >BB's standing on rock by attachment appears having a preferred direction >coinciding to wind direction, also their positions. > >I dont know how the concluded to hematite, but I think this would be only valid >by >pre-assumption of inorganic origin. Yes, indeed, living matter is apparently NOT one of the NASA working hypotheses. Apparently the they are not taking into account their own findings that a large part of Mars has water or ice just under the surface. See: It is unfathomable to me that despite the above findings, the geologists seem unable to identify the ice they are churning up on the surface, or to realize that it is a lifeform that is making the crust which traps the water underground. Further, the scientists involved in the pronouncements are geologists. They seem to not have enough scientific integrity and conservatism to permit a team with proper credentials, i.e. exobilogists or even biologists, to deliver or even make the determinations that are necessary. It would appear that, as geologists, the only thing on their brains are rocks. They apparently can not conceive of the subject minerals being in solution or gel form, or distributed in a fibrous matrix, or being part of a living thing. I wonder how they would explain the fact that the surface features of some lichen has exactly the same surface features as seen on Mars "berries". See: It seems like a safe bet that in general the instruments being applied were calibrated on terrestrial rocks, and certainly NOT very likely on terrestial lifeforms having a high sulfer content. At 9:16 PM 3/18/4, wrote: >See full size images at pages >http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/spirit_m073.html >It appears lot of long and short thin filaments embedded in the texture. >Texture >in turn appears a solidified >material impacted by rain drops of something. Solidified material should >be thin >enough to protect >profile of the filaments. > > >Note that these filaments are in smooth shapes, not look like as cracks. Notice that where Spirit disrupted the surface it separated out a bunch of miniature potato-like objects which more or less floated (via stirring disruption) to the top of the soil in the ditch: These can be seen growing in the crustose lichen at the surface of the sand dune, more or less in cross-section at: and in similar Sol 73 photos. Further, it appears there is a fairly large round ball under the surface right at the corner of the cut of the trench, under the long shadow from Spirit. It appears to me that the surface of the sand is covered with a crustose lichen similar to various terrestrial lichen, and to the ANderson lichen seen earlier near Spirit's linding site. The fruiting bodies in this case are not the perithecium like those seen by Opportunity, but rather are apothecium or asci which grow down in the hymenium, and not on stalks. It is interresting that some of the small surface features include many branching tendrils like the veins of small leaves. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Mar 18 15:29:17 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2INTD4B031757; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 15:29:13 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2INTCbR031748; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 15:29:12 -0800 Resent-Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 15:29:12 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f From: John Fields To: vortex-l eskimo.com Cc: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: German scientists prove information travels faster than light to view future! Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 16:51:00 -0600 Organization: Austin Instruments, Inc. Message-ID: References: <15a.30280451.2d8920a0 aol.com> <200403172317.03123.rockcast@earthlink.net> In-Reply-To: <200403172317.03123.rockcast earthlink.net> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ultra6.eskimo.com id i2INTA4B031731 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53605 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 23:17:03 -0500, you wrote: >On Wednesday 17 March 2004 12:34, John Fields wrote: >> On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 22:31:44 EST, you wrote: >> >Scalar Waves written by Konstantin Meyl shows that the transmission of >> >information at speeds faster than light with photons, microwaves, and >> > laser beams has been proven at the University of Berkley, Cologne >> > Germany, and Vienna. When information travels faster than light it is >> > received before it is sent out. >> >> --- >> No, it isn't. It would be merely be received in less time than it would >> take if it was being transmitted conventionally. >> --- >> >> >If we send information to ourselves by means of satellites at faster than >> >light speeds, we can see the information before we send it on our >> > receivers, which means we can look into the future, once we get our >> > communications networks set up properly. >> >> --- >> No it doesn't. All it means is we would receive the information more >> quickly than if it were transmitted by conventional means. >> --- >> >> >The speed of energy or scalar waves can travel faster than the >> >speed of light by means of Tesla scalar waves also. >> >> --- >> Perhaps, put I don't think a transmitter-receiver pair has yet been >> built which proves that superluminal communications has been achieved. > > >May be so, but let us allow him to prove otherwise; and/or anyone else while >we are at it. --- I don't know where you managed to come up with the idea that I was attemptying to keep him from proving that what he says is true. On the contrary, all my last line says is that I don't believe it's happened yet, which should be an invitation to prove me wrong. --- >After all, another forgotten group of 'professional skeptics' >from another age, the 1940's and before, postulated that man would >never conquer the sound barrier. They said we would shake ourselves >apart. After the goal was reached, all the voices of fashionable >skepticism faded into the woodwork and into the night never to be seen >or heard from again. It was no longer possible to keep ones job or >grant or take another's away from them by spouting dogma. Quite the >opposite as the cold light of new truth drove the Phillistines out of at >least THAT temple. --- There have always been, there are now, and there always will be skeptics and debunkers, who's proclivities toward disbelief should add fuel to the fire of those who profess to believe in the miraculous to come up with proof instead of merely rhetoric. --- >If we are to avoid a new dark age of feudalism and exploitation of man by >man, we will need these people that dare to think 'out of the box' as Marc >Millis put it while he was in charge of the late 'breakthrough physics' >group. Otherwise we are fated to be thrown back on ourselves and into >a world of limited resource and no hope. The earth is a big place, but >we are a big race and outgrowing our womb. We need to be able to >reach out. First to our local system for more resources and energy, >then to other local star systems. Out there are virtually limitless >resources, and we are only now beginning to attain the enabling technologies >to be able to exploit them. Out there also are isolated spaces in which >to test ideas and technologies that may be hazardous on our home world. > >Granted new ideas are messy. And dangerous on occasion! But human >progress is charted on an eneven course of odd milestones. The simple >invention of a new process for waterproof cement for mortar to proof stone >walls against hydraulic pressure enabled the city to New York to become >the metropolis it is today. The waterproof walls enabled canal locks >on the Erie Canal to be built economically from local materials. This led >to an explosion of commerce that made New York City its hub. Another such >new idea is the space elevator. Just think of what a long fiber nanotube >will enable if an when it can lower delivered pound of cargo to high earth >orbit or interplanetary transit....from 10,000 dollars a pound to 10 dollars >a pound. Or think of what a MITEE engine of an output similar to a Russian >Proton rocket could do to transform the Russian Buran design LEO shuttle >into a true space shuttle with interplanetary capabilities in a single stage. --- Please, spare me the platitudes and wishful thinking. --- >It WILL be done. If not by us, then by the Chinese. Who then will truly be >more fit to lead the human race to greatness. --- That's a racist remark if I ever heard one. Why would it matter who the leaders were? -- John Fields From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Mar 18 15:38:54 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2INco4B001336; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 15:38:50 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2INcnok001323; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 15:38:49 -0800 Resent-Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 15:38:49 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 14:44:40 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: RE: DoE to review LENR/CF Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53606 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 4:21 PM 3/18/4, Jed Rothwell wrote: >Not only is cold fusion impossibly controversial, but you must remember >that the government is now in the worst financial crisis it has been in >since the Civil War, with outlandish and unsustainable deficits. There will >be no new funding for any program for the foreseeable future, until this >crisis is resolved. And despite the crisis, entrenched, corrupt programs >such as agricultural price supports, hot fusion, and coal and oil subsidies >have not been cut; they have been vastly increased. (Indeed, that is one of >the causes of the runaway deficits.) There is not the slightest chance the >hot fusion or oil lobbyists will allow $1 million, or $1 thousand of their >funding to be diverted to cold fusion. Anything who thinks otherwise knows >nothing about politics. Hot fusion funding will continue to monopolize >every available dollar until the day that all the newspapers magazines and >scientific journals features headline articles confirming that cold fusion >is real. This is an all or nothing fight. They will not break or surrender >one inch of ground until they are destroyed. I base that assessment on the >history of similar funding battles in government and industry, in fields >such as transportation, computing, telecommunications and energy. It is ironic that the above is probably true, especially since there significant adverse yet powerful interests other than the above also involved. It is also ironic that our national defense and economy is exactly what is at stake at stake here. I am certainly not saying anything new here when I say a source of cheap energy on the horizon should do a lot for us both militarily and economically. > >Cold fusion will only be funded by private sources of money. It is far too >controversial for a mainstream organization such as the DoE or the APS. > >- Jed This is why I liked the idea of an independent permanent fund for renewable energy development. A legacy fund. It was a great idea. At lot better than what ever is second best. If anyone can not remember it I will be glad to post it again. Maybe some politician will adopt it as his own, though I guess only Kerry and Bush are likely to be the only ones who could do so effectively, so it is not likely to happen. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Mar 18 15:44:53 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2INidfX007848; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 15:44:44 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2INicxI007836; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 15:44:38 -0800 Resent-Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 15:44:38 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net (Unverified) Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 14:50:28 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Asteroid flyby tonight Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53607 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: You have to read this article to believ sombody could actually say these things: . Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Mar 18 23:27:42 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2J7Rc9j017931; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 23:27:38 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2J7Rahx017919; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 23:27:36 -0800 Resent-Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 23:27:36 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f From: Erikbaard aol.com Message-ID: <39.456217e2.2d8bfae4 aol.com> Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 02:27:32 EST Subject: Mars UFO To: vortex-l eskimo.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_39.456217e2.2d8bfae4_boundary" X-Mailer: 8.0 for Windows sub 6024 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53608 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: --part1_39.456217e2.2d8bfae4_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/3520636.stm --part1_39.456217e2.2d8bfae4_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/= nature/3520636.stm
--part1_39.456217e2.2d8bfae4_boundary-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Mar 19 02:57:49 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2JAve9j022949; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 02:57:40 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2JAvcc5022934; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 02:57:38 -0800 Resent-Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 02:57:38 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-Id: <2.2.32.20040319105541.00696d88 pop.freeserve.net> X-Sender: grimer2.freeserve.co.uk pop.freeserve.net X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 2.2 (32) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 10:55:41 +0000 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Grimer Subject: Re: Asteroid flyby tonight Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53609 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 02:50 pm 18-03-04 -0900, you wrote: >You have to read this article to believe somebody could actually say these >things: > >. > >Regards, > >Horace Heffner Seemed OK to me. I am obviously missing something. :-) Half a brain, perhaps. Could you elucidate please Horace? By the way, did that package of papers ever arise in the frozen north. Cheers Frank Grimer From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Mar 19 05:35:58 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2JDZsOH031835; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 05:35:54 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2JDZqaJ031774; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 05:35:52 -0800 Resent-Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 05:35:52 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <405AF742.5070107 rtpatlanta.com> Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 08:36:02 -0500 From: "Terry Blanton" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: [Fwd: ICCF11] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53610 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: This came in today. ICCMNS?? Terry -------- Original Message -------- Subject: ICCF11 Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 11:55:52 +0100 From: Jean-Paul Biberian To: biberian crmcn.univ-mrs.fr Dear colleague, It is my pleasure to announce you that ICCF11, the 11th International Conference on Consensed Matter Nuclear Science will he held in Marseilles, France from October 31 till November 5, 2004. Registrations are open at : www.iccf11.org Some highlights of the conference: In addition to the usual format of this type of conferences we will have: 1- An open session at the University of Marseilles, with demonstrations 2- A special evening session where we will discuss with economists, philosophers, journalists and scientists, the consequences of the application of "Cold Fusion" in our day to day life, but also the geopolitical and economical changes that might occur. 3- The week long meeting will end with a press conference. I hope to see you in Marseilles Jean Paul Biberian Chairman PS: note my new email address (only slightly different): biberian crmcn.univ-mrs.fr From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Mar 19 08:10:16 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2JGAAOH007972; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 08:10:11 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2JGA23t007945; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 08:10:02 -0800 Resent-Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 08:10:02 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 07:15:54 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: Asteroid flyby tonight Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53611 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 1:55 AM 3/19/4, Grimer wrote: >>. >Could you elucidate please Horace? Sure. The article stated: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - "The important thing is not that it's happening, but that we detected it," Chesley said. ... Astronomers have not ruled out that the asteroid and our planet could meet again sometime in the future. If the two were to collide, the asteroid likely would disintegrate in the atmosphere, Chesley said. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - A 100 ft diameter meter carries a big punch, and the angle of incidence may not be large for a given meteor impact. A 100 ft diameter meteor carries a big punch. From the web page below we see that 60 m diameter meteor = 10 megatons TNT just from earth's gravity: A 100 ft diameter meteor will expend about 1.2 megatons TNT, and if the angle of incidence is high it really doesn't really matter if that energy is in the atmosphere or in the ground. However, based on the fact that fairly small meteors can make it to earth, it seems to me a 100 ft diamter meteor should have no trouble. The other thing that strikes me as important is the cavalier attitude regarding the fact that the asteroid was only detected a day before potential impact. It is not important that the asteroid was detected, what is important is that most aren't and even when they are they are detected too late to do anything about it regarding the civilian population. An event like this happening every two years or so is a serious thing. If scientists take it lightly, how can we expect the public to take the long term action that is needed to protect ourselves? > >By the way, did that package of papers ever arise >in the frozen north. Yes they did, thanks. I read the papers but didn't see much new over what was posted on the web or vortex. I did want to look into it further, as structural engineering is outside my little area of knowledge, but looking into it has slid down my list of priorities for now. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Mar 19 08:12:01 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2JGBoOH008326; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 08:11:54 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2JGBnub008306; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 08:11:49 -0800 Resent-Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 08:11:49 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f From: Standing Bear To: vortex-l eskimo.com, Grimer Subject: Re: Asteroid flyby tonight Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 11:22:05 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <2.2.32.20040319105541.00696d88 pop.freeserve.net> In-Reply-To: <2.2.32.20040319105541.00696d88 pop.freeserve.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200403191122.05547.rockcast earthlink.net> Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53612 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: On Friday 19 March 2004 05:55, Grimer wrote: > At 02:50 pm 18-03-04 -0900, you wrote: > >You have to read this article to believe somebody could actually say these > >things: > > > >. > > > >Regards, > > > >Horace Heffner > > Seemed OK to me. I am obviously missing something. :-) > Half a brain, perhaps. > > Could you elucidate please Horace? > > By the way, did that package of papers ever arise > in the frozen north. > > Cheers > > Frank Grimer Part of the above article, the feely goody be comfy Alfred E. Newman 'what me worry' part says as follows: ..." it immediately became clear it would pass very close by the Earth," Chesley said. Astronomers have not ruled out that the asteroid and our planet could meet again sometime in the future. If the two were to collide, the asteroid likely would disintegrate in the atmosphere, Chesley said." The sad thing is that much of the public will believe this arrant nonsense merely because CNN spouted it on its web page for one and possibly on its stations as well. If this thing comes back, few will remember what CNN said except folks like us. While they are counting the dead, they will probably only mutter things like 'it was God's will'. WE NEED A BETTER SPACE SHUTTLE, AND NOT A CHEMICALLY POWERED ARTILLERY SHELL; BUT ONE THAT CAN MANEUVER, USES NUCLEAR OR MIRROR FUSION/NUCLEAR POWER, CAN TAKE OFF IN A SINGLE STAGE, AND CAN MANEUVER ON ITS OWN AND CARRY WEAPONS TO DEFLECT FUTURE SPACE ROCKS!!! Standing Bear ps....maybe the Chinese will build one with the profits from the sale of Nike tennis sneakers. That'll get Uncle Sam movin' !! Standing Bear From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Mar 19 08:27:36 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2JGRV9j031541; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 08:27:31 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2JGR5pv031408; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 08:27:05 -0800 Resent-Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 08:27:05 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <405B1F53.20402 rtpatlanta.com> Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 11:26:59 -0500 From: "Terry Blanton" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Asteroid flyby tonight References: <2.2.32.20040319105541.00696d88 pop.freeserve.net> <200403191122.05547.rockcast@earthlink.net> In-Reply-To: <200403191122.05547.rockcast earthlink.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53613 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Standing Bear wrote: >ps....maybe the Chinese will build one with the profits from the sale of Nike tennis >sneakers. > Right now, they're buying steel. We've seen the price jump 8% due to their massive purchases. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Mar 19 10:03:52 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2JI3hPa008369; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 10:03:43 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2JI3ba6008346; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 10:03:37 -0800 Resent-Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 10:03:37 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <001201c40ddd$ae7bd0e0$7021e544 lv.cox.net> From: "Vince Cockeram" To: References: Subject: Re: Asteroid flyby tonight Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 10:12:03 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Resent-Message-ID: <1TX6j.A.TCC.5XzWAB ultra6.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53614 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: ----- Original Message ----- From: "Horace Heffner" To: Sent: Friday, March 19, 2004 8:15 AM Subject: Re: Asteroid flyby tonight > . . . . ."If the two were to collide, the > asteroid likely would disintegrate in the atmosphere, Horace, I caught this rediculous statement too. Couple of questions. What would a 100 ft. diameter (assume basalt) rock mass? How fast is this bugger going with respect to the earth. F=MA :) From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Mar 19 13:57:52 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2JLveCG020390; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 13:57:41 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2JLvYX8020358; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 13:57:34 -0800 Resent-Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 13:57:34 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 13:03:24 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Space based radar project Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53615 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Finding and cataloging all earth orbit crossing asteroids and comets is a difficult to impossible task - impossible because some may come from the Ort cloud or beyond and thus not have any possibility of being observed for a periods of a century or more, much less cataloged. If an object approaches from out that far it likely has not been around for decades, so is very unlikely to have been cataloged. The only solution that has a chance of providing a really high quality warning system then it seems lies in building a space based radar system. Such a radar system would have to be very high powered, and would have to have a multi-directional receiver for long range and an omni-directional receiver for short range. It would have to operate 24 hours a day in order to receive bounce signals. It would probably require a comparatively low noise environment in its bandwidth. The subject radar should generate a continuous signal which is continually tagged with the time and celestial coordinates at which the beam is aimed. In that manner, when a return signal is received, it is possible to tell the coordinates of and distance to the object at the time of the signal bounce from the object. In addition, through doppler analysis, it might be possible to determine at least one component of the velocity as well. It likely would take multiple radar platforms with significantly differing orbits in order to achieve full coverage. Using such an asteroid radar system, it should be possible to locate and catalog all nearby earth orbit crossing objects of significant size, and also to locate dangerous objects incoming from long range in sufficient time to either employ an asteroid deflecting system (if such is actually built) or to make the best possible arrangements for earth populations. Such a radar base might be manned, but it seems that NASA has recently both demonstrated the great potential of and the need for robotic maintenance capabilites. Robots are clearly the main future of space exploration. Further, space platforms of the future should be designed in a modular fashion so as to permit robotic maintenance. If Hubble were so designed, for example, it could now be robot maintained, and its future would not be in jeapardy. Robots go on one way trips. They do not require re-entry vehicles, crew compartments, air, water, or waste removal. The only thing missing is sufficient robotic technology, but that is coming fast. It seems to me a national mission with much more return for the dollar, both to the space program, military, and the economy, than manned missions to the moon and Mars would be a mission on the order of the 60's space program to develop robotics and nano-technology. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Mar 19 14:53:43 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2JMrCTn000428; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 14:53:12 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2JMr9Vv000384; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 14:53:09 -0800 Resent-Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 14:53:09 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-Id: <2.2.32.20040319225102.0068f4f0 pop.freeserve.net> X-Sender: grimer2.freeserve.co.uk pop.freeserve.net X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 2.2 (32) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 22:51:02 +0000 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Grimer Subject: Re: Asteroid flyby tonight Resent-Message-ID: <7M9OrC.A.5F.Sn3WAB ultra5.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53616 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 07:15 am 19-03-04 -0900, you wrote: >At 1:55 AM 3/19/4, Grimer wrote: > >>>. > >>Could you elucidate please Horace? > >Sure. The article stated: >- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - >"The important thing is not that it's happening, but that we detected >it," Chesley said. ... > >Astronomers have not ruled out that the asteroid and our planet could >meet again sometime in the future. If the two were to collide, the >asteroid likely would disintegrate in the atmosphere, Chesley said. >- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > >A 100 ft diameter meter ... [soto voce] voltmeter or ammeter? ;-) (only kidding) .....carries a big punch, and the angle of incidence may >not be large for a given meteor impact. A 100 ft diameter meteor carries a >big punch. From the web page below we see that 60 m diameter meteor = 10 >megatons TNT just from earth's gravity: > > > >A 100 ft diameter meteor will expend about 1.2 megatons TNT, and if the >angle of incidence is high it really doesn't really matter if that energy >is in the atmosphere or in the ground. However, based on the fact that >fairly small meteors can make it to earth, it seems to me a 100 ft diamter >meteor should have no trouble. > >The other thing that strikes me as important is the cavalier attitude >regarding the fact that the asteroid was only detected a day before >potential impact. It is not important that the asteroid was detected, what >is important is that most aren't and even when they are they are detected >too late to do anything about it regarding the civilian population. An >event like this happening every two years or so is a serious thing. If >scientists take it lightly, how can we expect the public to take the long >term action that is needed to protect ourselves? Thanks very much. Your explanation and criticism seem very reasonable to me. Forgive the leg-pull. I couldn't resist it. :-) Frank From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Mar 19 15:53:37 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2JNrUTn013874; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 15:53:31 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2JNrROh013854; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 15:53:27 -0800 Resent-Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 15:53:27 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net (Unverified) Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 14:59:17 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: Asteroid flyby tonight Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53617 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 10:12 AM 3/19/4, Vince Cockeram wrote: >Horace, I caught this rediculous statement too. >Couple of questions. >What would a 100 ft. diameter (assume basalt) rock mass? >How fast is this bugger going with respect to the earth. >F=MA :) Well I trusted the calculations at the bottom of the web page at: However, since you mentioned it I tried a computation from scratch as follows. You can conservatively assume an ateroid will impact the earth at around earth escape velocity. Anything higher simply means larger energy upon impact (assuming of course is not in earth orbit and the earth is chasing it.) Escape velocity for earth is 11.18 km/s. Density of rock Rho can be assumed to be about 3 times water or 3 g/cm^3 = 3000 kg/m^3. The radius of the object is (100 ft/2) = 15.24 m. The mass of the object m = rho (4/3) Pi (r)^3 = (4/3) * 3.14 * (3000 kg/m^3) * (1/(15.24 m))^3 = 4.45x10^7 kg. The energy is E = (1/2) m v^2 = (1/2)(4.45x10^7 kg)(11.18 km/s)^2 = 2.78x10^15 J. A kiloton of TNT = 4.184 x 10^12 J. The energy is thus (2.78x10^15 J)/(4.184 x 10^12 J/kT) = 665 kilotons TNT. A little less than you get by scaling the guestimate provided on the above web page. Of course if you assume just a bit more velocity than escape velocity you get right back up to about 1 megaton TNT. It's in that ballpark for sure. If you happen to be in the impact area I doubt the difference will be significant! 8^) Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Mar 19 17:21:04 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2K1KuDt012733; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 17:21:01 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2K1KtHP012719; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 17:20:55 -0800 Resent-Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 17:20:55 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <410-22004362012416750 ix.netcom.com> X-Priority: 3 Reply-To: aki ix.netcom.com X-Mailer: EarthLink MailBox 2004.1.42.0 (Windows) From: "Akira Kawasaki" To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: FW: WHAT'S NEW Friday, March 19, 2004 Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 17:24:16 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-ELNK-Trace: c4cc7f5f697e8746f66dc3a06d5924d85d0bafad7280ffc44ab0521f0f50f6df350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53618 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: > [Original Message] > From: What's New To: Akira Kawasaki Date: 3/19/2004 1:59:16 PM Subject: WHAT'S NEW Friday, March 19, 2004 WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 19 Mar 04 Washington, DC 1. HUBBLE: A DISASTER DELAYED ITS BIRTH AND MAY HASTEN ITS DEATH. Adm. Gehman, chair of the Columbia Investigation Board described a mission to Hubble as "slightly more risky" than to the ISS. But in Sunday's NY Times, NASA Administrator Sean O'Keefe reaffirmed his decision to let Hubble die rather than risk a shuttle repair mission. It's difficult to find anyone who thinks O'Keefe, who is neither scientist nor astronaut, should be the one making that decision, and Sen. Mikulski (D-MD) warned O'Keefe not to prejudge the outcome of a National Academy of Sciences study of the issue. The irony is that NASA insisted that Hubble be designed to be launched and serviced by the shuttle. The launch was delayed for three years by the Challenger disaster and the Columbia disaster now threatens to accelerate its demise by three years. 2. MISSILE DEFENSE: UNITED STATES WINS CLOSE GAME AT THE BUZZER. You can sleep better now; Tuesday, March 16, a computer-simulated missile attack by a country that looked a lot like North Korea was repelled without a single American city being hit. I called Puff Panegyric in the Missile Defense Agency press office to offer my congratulations. "Yes, we're feeling pretty good about it," Puff rasped, his voice still a little hoarse from cheering. "The goal now is to complete initial deployment of a rudimentary defense by 2 November." I smelled a story. "Golly Puff, is that when intelligence estimates say North Korea will have a working missile and a nuclear warhead?" "That's classified," he said. 3. POLYGRAPH: IS TELLING THE TRUTH PUBLICLY AS BAD AS LYING? About a year ago the National Academy of Sciences completed a review of scientific evidence on the polygraph, "The Polygraph and Lie Detection." It concluded that the use of polygraph tests for DOE employee security screening was unacceptable because of the high rate of false positives. DOE took the position that a lot of false positives must mean the test is very sensitive, and simply reissued its old polygraph policies without change. http://www.aps.org/WN/WN03/wn041803.cfm A nuclear scientist at Sandia National Laboratories, Alan Zelicoff, thought that was pretty dumb, which it was, and he said so publicly. Sandia took disciplinary action, and Zelicoff says he was forced to resign. THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND. Opinions are the author's and not necessarily shared by the University of Maryland, but they should be. --- Archives of What's New can be found at http://www.aps.org/WN You are currently subscribed to whatsnew as: aki ix.netcom.com To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-whatsnew-47101V lists.apsmsgs.org To subscribe, send a blank e-mail to: From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Mar 19 18:34:59 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2K2YtDt029853; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 18:34:55 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2K2Yseu029838; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 18:34:54 -0800 Resent-Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 18:34:54 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <002601c40e24$73248040$c864a8c0 win98> From: To: Subject: Micro filaments on Mars Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 04:37:33 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_001F_01C40E35.0F9E3AA0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53619 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_001F_01C40E35.0F9E3AA0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit You may recall the first filament "cat hair" was spotted on Opportunity photo. If one examine carefully, less evident filaments can be seen on most of microscopic photos, specially on sandy places. They are not simply cracks on sand or aligned grains but real things passing over other materials. These filaments possibly not developed there, but carried by wind from long distances and spreading everywhere, I think. I also spotted a different kind of "filament" which look like better to small thin worms on photos in page http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/opportunity_m039.html, picture 1M131648609EFF0544P2951M2M1.JPG and similar ones. Maybe these ones are responsible to open small holes on "potatoes" and on BB's :) Attached photo is very compressed, see the original picture. Regards, hamdi ucar ------=_NextPart_000_001F_01C40E35.0F9E3AA0 Content-Type: image/jpeg; name="1M131648609EFF0544P2951M2M1-frame1.jpg" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="1M131648609EFF0544P2951M2M1-frame1.jpg" /9j/4AAQSkZJRgABAQEASABIAAD/2wBDACAWGBwYFCAcGhwkIiAmMFA0MCwsMGJGSjpQdGZ6eHJm cG6AkLicgIiuim5woNqirr7EztDOfJri8uDI8LjKzsb/2wBDASIkJDAqMF40NF7GhHCExsbGxsbG xsbGxsbGxsbGxsbGxsbGxsbGxsbGxsbGxsbGxsbGxsbGxsbGxsbGxsbGxsb/wAARCAEbAlIDASIA AhEBAxEB/8QAHwAAAQUBAQEBAQEAAAAAAAAAAAECAwQFBgcICQoL/8QAtRAAAgEDAwIEAwUFBAQA AAF9AQIDAAQRBRIhMUEGE1FhByJxFDKBkaEII0KxwRVS0fAkM2JyggkKFhcYGRolJicoKSo0NTY3 ODk6Q0RFRkdISUpTVFVWV1hZWmNkZWZnaGlqc3R1dnd4eXqDhIWGh4iJipKTlJWWl5iZmqKjpKWm p6ipqrKztLW2t7i5usLDxMXGx8jJytLT1NXW19jZ2uHi4+Tl5ufo6erx8vP09fb3+Pn6/8QAHwEA AwEBAQEBAQEBAQAAAAAAAAECAwQFBgcICQoL/8QAtREAAgECBAQDBAcFBAQAAQJ3AAECAxEEBSEx BhJBUQdhcRMiMoEIFEKRobHBCSMzUvAVYnLRChYkNOEl8RcYGRomJygpKjU2Nzg5OkNERUZHSElK U1RVVldYWVpjZGVmZ2hpanN0dXZ3eHl6goOEhYaHiImKkpOUlZaXmJmaoqOkpaanqKmqsrO0tba3 uLm6wsPExcbHyMnK0tPU1dbX2Nna4uPk5ebn6Onq8vP09fb3+Pn6/9oADAMBAAIRAxEAPwC0XxgA 8U3fjkHNRlsCoWk255oAk+0lpggPBOK10YBAMAY61gWaNcXH+yDmttiFHJ5oAUyg9846GkEueGIz UGcEtTJWUrx1PagC3vP8NKTkDNRpu2AmlY0ADxqwz1I6UjR5A7Uwnnk09ZM4XqKAFX5RjqaY4JPy nHrTnYRHONxHY0xX3DJ4NAADs6jNPBVeeuetJn8/aoxuDEnkUASk59h2zVe5AaMj73pTLhyvRc1G jLyNzbz1zQBCrqrHemWPvUuGeIOX2sOMDoaUxMAS2GA9ahZ93y4xz0oAUuclH+6Rz2xUpmiaPCjO Rj61DOpkZgR8vQH1qFo33BVXJUUAXoLaNmPmsVBHY8VWEAEhLOWwcKPanHMUIQDe3Uio2nLEyTIQ /GBjFAGrbrmEFu2eBTPKUOSD1qC2aUIEbhOoUVbYED7vHrQBXkt95yD+VNFtkZLYNWjjbyKZg5yD x6UAQx8/J6dzQ8pUgplvWnmJ9w2j6mpRCVU7RyetAEquhAyoye1OESg52AfSo4kIbLflU7ISPegC vcMyMAeM9DUSyhmwTvxU8sTOPmOcdqijtSj8Dg0AJIpUAoMjqB6VELaR2G4DB96ueSA24n8KUlSe OKAM6WxZHUxDJPv0qOSXYSuBkcH1NahAAIxWVcRbpCqDDE8mgBwmVIi4Bx0C+9Rm4EjRluuMYxS+ UFPC/IP50xicGULtUcAetAF+S3R49qyNkjkCozbeXGV2EtnOQM8Uy3lUQAbsH0qyGzkKfoaAM4xs rgxHofu0+OV5SQ4BCirE4VVZ2OGHeqEspVSwGd/Q96AFT52PRAeetOjAaMtKuScgc4pYbcE7pixQ jmnY3RuyfdxhcjkUAPjdi+ePL29KjXy3k/eJh+2O5ptuspk80njpWhFtLEbRxyaAKvllz9zBPJAq WK0CjDclvUdKme4SL+HHpjpQkxfDUADWK4wCFx6VRuY3XOWJ56mr0srR4LDk9xVWS5O4ADv+dAFY ZBwmDkYHHNTq7LGu4Y6ZqSaCe1kjkQht/UCoGkZfllUKCeCO/NAEckpkcSAYI71ItvJcP8nU9eet LFbGUkA4T+I461YjkW3lIA3AcHHUCgCLyisTngMnIAquD5oJYEk/dPv6GnvmWdyrbNx59qfFH8zK DuJNAE8KCQIrDp1/CrMoxny1zioreCQNlzjt9albeqkbcj1oAikDKmT+VQ7WkYEfLx0q2wafbvGA B0pTGqDHegCl9nJbkdeMmni2c42EFf1NWTHI8agKNq9+9SRgQpg8n1NAEDqzuMDoMcVUZdn3wTt5 x2FWWlYMWXBHpTJnbk7gA3BBFAFS2klaTaBheh561cXdkrgfhVYuQ6rjp0NXYsKNqjA9aAF+VQSx JPpUKHLnjaDUs33QckmqU874VEGMdaAL0CZZjUr4BBA5qC1YPypwCMH61I2ee4FAC7/XrUQdiSBT HkwDjg0+HkBmJoAeemPzphXHNOYhWGe9DDdzQAmVoo2GigCnJgpwaqzK20HtWh5Xy4/OozApI3DI FABprhI9uPmq4z7hg1mSKUfzN3PQCp47gSDJGPegCxI+ABUJcM47EGkJLZI5AqAct3JoA0xKTgA1 IxHSqkbDHPUVL5gI60AOkiBXOaZBtQAk55qVXBGAajS3zJudPk65zQBNLh/TikRWL8jj2pyQYBLd KeBwTj6UANdOfSmlBtIzjNKqsW9RT2UL7GgChOsyYbHyjvTJ3XcDnkirsjDYRxWU7qrleoNAEzu3 khl5B7VHCVZyWdQR6GmyBDtjRiv+zSqvGH25H5mgBJ5XYYjYAd8rT8MiiVW3LjmkGGt2yBuJzx6U i4VMbPkxy1ADblVXCw5LNy1SW1ozSDMn3hzgdKbJiFFMRJz1b+lOsrlVl3SsVZuMUAaqhIYgi8HF NJPUcmoz8xznihWwfftQA15SY3V04PWpII1SIYOfSpSIynzj/wCvSJtH3RgUAAVifQU9vlwMZNMM u3r+FKJUx70AP3opztxTHlOMqcVFJJn7pz7VWd88jtQBa8xuueaFmw3161QaZU+8etV5L0q+1RxQ Bsl1xxSLKMjP41mw3O5Tk5qRpjtznGetAGgHzxgfWq8iYkBADAmqsdzliN1WopRzzQBO8WU4IUmq LW7gFWzjOcgZqwzFuhp6HOAOcUAZgt5EDO6FTng5pIXbHzHvx71sO4PU1RuofLBeMHB5IHrQBWmm Zs85Knoe9NBVpVLhjkZJAPH0pTCZY/MH3uuQcHNKhIX94uW9TQBLHIrs7SMXVlwF9KYmNx2ygDsp qJj++DIwYjg9sVE0nmTqzDaCccetAE6sG3qMr6g8ZxU9vDjDA7eAM+vrUSKgbL4KqeuamlmUqAP0 NACSRK/8Q2np71GzCHIGcDnihSWBVeoHSo9zHHmduKAJB5siq2Q+OT7VFIGWQFmxx0qVZgOnyACm 7TJhMhg3VvSgCf7VuRmC7lUY5NV40d2Lu2V6pnqakMaBNmSH7k+naoxG2OXIiH8X8qAJUmdGznPr kc0+IxiQnaMuOtQPIpfMRwMZJ9aigJWbPIX2oAsvCvSM4V++OaRNsT/L94H5jSz71jXAyD3ot7Vn Ukk7SM89aANCOYTIMce1SEqox/OqggEYG1jgfrTUmLS7SPzNAFktgeh7UjMGcbuBTipLe1Qsu6XB JJFAE7ShFxnPpmqkztIxWNt2e3pTblXLbE59+1G9I18tEYygc4OMfWmk3sBG5e3RXIDEGoXmDndL L94k7RUkduZj++cn2HSpDElvIMKDxxinZICOFlxtCvtHP3DUst2gAUMVH+0MVYhfecsKlYoVwRn1 ovECqsokUt1UcZpkqw7v3meR0oktVy7D5D2296iKukimfAX+8vf60WvsBbtTGZCseMdc1abG/j8q rW8aAllUDPcd6mGBJkDipAa8Kls7aZ/Cc4GKs5B4zkVG0ab+mKAICfXpUiYC5/Sh3CHBFQO5HOci gCfIoqp5h96KALTIpYljzUDoQTt5qSZueetNVweCMUAU2Bldsjp2x1qOJC7eWo2LngVoHaAQBgel Qy7D0XafXPNAEsUPlrs3Z/Ck8rYDjvSW5cDnP19afuPlsW4oAhYbI97ZpsUu5gF6etP3CRSTyKfa wJIwGMCgCxBCXYN0APNWZHVRgCnhQiYXpUTKoOfWgBPMJHHU0FsYzmhVweKXGP4qAGmRuAo/Gopp CODnNSNJ6fnWdezlPmGSfegBLy5Ea4zz7VVhfe4IGceoqnKzuS9T20pcbC2AOlAEwmBYsRhs8E9a jYsxBI5HGc0+Rg5I3bcDgDvTUVifu4z1oAeN3koNn0q6CBEQeFUdap+ZIBuHQd6mC+fBtkwGb7p7 mgCOHD5wxbJyAKg8p2LF5CoHUVZ8poB5SEI2M5Peo89RKNx7UAWLCcy5U8qg6mrZYnoPpWZHcDYU jTEv94U/7W6uUwHIGSaANAucDPIp5PGBxVRJ/NjBAp5ctnBwBQBKXycVEz7RmopJcEZPSkY70FAC tISDjrUayhpMYP0oYMPu5/KnMjMFOOe1AEUkQlOV+8KrShnlzzgdRV+OCTHyjJzzTJBJGxC4BagC vbrl8LkEdqt+WCMn8akihDoex9RQI2hGWLYHY96AKkkBXa+OO9O83Y+fur2WrEjRuvp60w25wGcZ U9CaAEa5xGWwM4yKcLk7QSOO4BxUMiDYH52jjbmkKrI+FJXA5UUAXI5/N+bkH6VI8wVM9c9aggYS DDLgr1YdxVhUABz0HagBLXYwdwcn3qQIs/yyJRGi7SAMgcn2p27HI6UAU5rBYyXjORnOKqeUTjAA C8gVpS5KEpyR2qkIioHXk5AoAZDbu3PC7eWI5yfpQsAY8cKx+bNWEtrhuW/djORiiUtEqp1Yn7x7 0AVyV/hzsXj60uNkPXaqnoO59aanLMpU4HPSleTzX8tPlC9h0oAfHF5j7ycgjqB0oKi1Q7Ofb1og uzHIYlQNnjNMnfeFWJdzqTyaAFmm8xl2xkMBycdqFEzw+XI/yLx9KUSsxbzSFUjp/hUYyEADEEck eooAYYTuwvzEHHtVgSCMgbACBgj3piurSosZwM5OasxqJpGcqMDj60AIjO752CrCxyquc/hUDKxk AXhRVguVXBxmgBjEjhulRQovmli3PYVG04Em1wWJ7mn/ADDDqBtAzzQBIskoJXPGadvYNu6kdagh nHODnnqaSa4VFIRiWb7v+NNK+gFiaVmPlwHDdXb+7/8AXqu6eWMRcDvz1pVlSJAozuPJ9/en7SQG dgM9BTb6ICCOXaxL52kHFELbx6Hpikc7CxYA4NLD87eYoBXipAuOAm0x8tjnNJGzBDkcdakYrtyB j3oZcrx0oAqM7ZO35jTwjSqrqucjBp0caJJufqf51biO0AbcDrQBWiR7VPMGTGfvJ/d9x7VNuBOe oPQ1MzAD3qorLBJ5Z/1b/c/2T6fSq+ICbKjOBUbOQORyaa7ego8wAcgVIAxLdajkxjnpSs3cUxyf LJ/KgBMr/eFFRZb+4KKALsiHaCcgGqZ3b+nyZ61Y818GNTnngdqrSFlJ3FeOdo6GgBwYkZLYHamq QEDsc80qshiLFclecU2D98QzLnBxQBJBIS5z07GpZeYzkjA71HMEgI/d5z0Ud6esIdQ9weeyDoKa XVgVw5Zf3as+O/RadCzq3Mqxk/3Vz+pq3ldpAUH+lQSQ72HoOgp8yWyAtRo5QMbiU/l/hTGEuflu X+jAGmI7KdpJA7UjMSeTzRzAPWadOqJKP9k4P5Uou1kbbyrD+Fhg1CXIHWmSssi/OAcd/Si6e4E8 svvis24kZ3IP3DxStIwONxZf73cUjIxGVG4daTVgKvlluCQpzwafbwgz4cbsc59aFjDuRtIPrU0a sgAOD2zSAljCq5APP8PHSkUMd21jvz1p00eyMNvxgc4psW7BfBI96AE8h2UbSFc9PelPnQoIiBn1 701bos2dmcHmpPMZ5Q8ifhQAsoeZQZcErzmo0B3sVyR3zRJMXYgLj0pVMkcJIGST8wzQA5FQNnOH x2pI0ZWOFG809S6Tp8uwAcc04sg4YEvnrQAkQ8u425/CrTDcML1PSoreKSTJ+97nrVyGER8sck0A Vns2kIYnBFOhtCrZJzn1q2xUdOtMZyOP5UABRE60hRTjPT0pm7uOmelAYk4xQBJ5uyLaq4PrVeeI zYxUxIByaPNVTx+VACxxeWoB4PpTXBfjNJ52cgYX2FCuvBoAimtVZDxg+tV7l5fJWNgSq9KvtKvO CRVSWRzlRypoAhiG9CX6561NDD5bEhqgCu69dpFSW1wIwVbkdqAJlQx/Me/WpASR2x9aqyTPKoGd uPzNNUsBtYcnvmgCTzgH25OT1qVdwzhvrUCvE33ByOKmH7tOQMHvQBYU5TiiOP8AeZ7CqS3n7zCk 8VIt7viwoxg56dKAJ7qRlUshB981UMnngs+Sq0pQysNoJ9Qar7GVJCrfLnaBQBIjM0cjRsMr1B/n VXIkJEY2nHINWreICBj52cjFEMUZnJIwAOtAFSFWEhym0gZ+tWIcsx3OVx1AHSnytthIChnJxmpL aBnIMgwoFAEFxvyqL0HXFTQqsaElcue9WJYMHHVcfdp8EO3BkHC9BQBQkt9gwqkZ5yOtODlB8gIx WhuyeB3qKZkB+ZRk96AIluAeMDpyKglkDj5W5poKu7KpxkGqoVt7FjwvIoAsM7CM7m3DsDTTJLtU cDcOPwqNZ043ghDzuxzmpEhaYkk/Kp796ABXEasqDJY1HGGMm9jwR19qsSrHHCFj6v8AKcelRKyg 5b7pP3arZATwxkPjOV+vSoLkszooG7Jp+BJIREdq47d6IWxJtdsn3qQEjUyAl/lAPAprfuwWjcrz gj1pZHJl5+VM/nUgdI5Q8gDJn7poAsCbDqrjoBU8khRcdAf1qm5DKcDbzkAc0sbM52u2VHY0ASR/ 69QSNpOcCrrvt4B6dKqwp1c0GbnmgB7SHGSeKikKyoU7Hp7GiUEJmmhGx7ULQASYmPLfeBw31qLz zzkAUybdFOD/AAv19yKikUs/C8EVUlqBZEmQKniHPzY5qjGGQA447GrImBXlefWpAnKDP/1qKaHO OtFADpoyANn3vXNVorVvPBmyVNaagMf9qoZsk4GT9KAKckYRmTBZR0qwjpDbFtv4DuaYWZAct+VE RMs284CRcAe9OK6sCWGMxkvIA0rdfb2FSSKHGf8AIob5zkcUx3KKfTtmhu7uBGwUHngd6asilwBg 4ocxuuS5FVn2o5OTx0pAWjzmoGJD5yKZJK3lgpnPc1HG5lOc4x3FAEsjk8jpUJbJwKduLNRGmDuI x6UALGtSRL5MgU/6tjxnsaEG9iAcVIybm8tuFIppgW/s6lMc4qrJaor7ufbBq1bMXiKs3zRnaT6+ /wDKleNXBzyaGrMDL2k7ieT79aQRylMBu+QKvRQxyM2c496kMCD5c0gM6EMAW754qbeeXaMZA4q+ iRquABz3qlPE+/ruH8qAItqMVY8HOcetOeIyHIXFG9SQSPuGp3IaDzVJB9KAKryFW+YZqWNgW2tn I6mkUbyAF+Y9SatJAWzkbz6ntQBNbDqxFBk+cgjA9amRBGgqGQJu3Ac+tABvBFR5ByM1WuJmjbGO DU0JQgHuaAJkUDoaMc9aU9Mr2phYgEk8elAEbyEdBzVa4kCAknkDJFF04EgzgA9/SoLmRZpFHReu TQAguETj+JhVqC4WUhGOP9o1R+zxso54B4NaBj3W6pGg2AcY5OaAImmJcqpyB3NPifcoYj6VWeNg C27jPTFNimEOE3E56+1AFydQwBTrVZrdsZPbOB61KJHZiOo6g1ajwGXcvXrzQBSiDMpGw785GOlW DG8qqCAM/e+XgVNMV6DGPaoJZGSPBfb3xQAqW6iUktkdc+9NuHfzMseDx8oqBS0kZIbB3YHuKeRK wwq9MZNAE5g3wY2jJ6N3qKON0UordRjFStOEwN24470xZTndtGO/tQBZDGKLOcNiqc7oEOBtfOTj vU6SFnKsMcdapN+9uWG/jGAaAHwBX3fINuOD71GxYSNzjHA96dG2ITGvXOelRpmWYk/OV4+lABjY 28kkHnFXrdw21jjHSnNAXjGDgioCmxixzx3oAvNMYwMj7xqKCdmyGO45qDzC67lB29KswIFVmIx6 UAQy3QQ4HLE4qIOspJbnHODUlzsRi20HHaqTMwyxOM9KAFZfNfaPlOeKd5Q2FWPAPze9M80q5fHI FPV4zDuK/PmgCPywwwWwn8NIkjKditt5xxUpEci4IIPY0yYLgFU+YHqO9ACrkXBIJG0dT2pu0ltw OSvapYYWlgaV+MsaYVYASoOBwaqW9gHSzLuVVQqT1pgQl/mOQBU0W2RHlk5YcKajuikYAgOQeo96 kBXPmuAccCkht8xcyHOeB/Km2EBdgc9f09qvNGkBHl8Ed6AKyLJDK0g42jkEdaj84+bluC3pSy3E s8p3MRt6U8IqsNgByepNAF+JgVIxx6+tI1uCQQeKceAu49Kj80FgFyc0ATsisMdKh2shxnIFTpGM jLfhSTYVeB+dAFW6h3wlwPufN+VT+XGqBlHUZpsT7lZWOQePwqGKUi0XPUDH5cVW8QFm2beAMVUE oZ8jpTGmZgRkg5NRxN5TbH5zyDUgaAeLAoqmTHn7zflRQBtKSCabkEHnilYnnHWkVR25NAEUuFja QoAFGelR2q+WoDH5iM49zyamvB/o+Nv3mVc59xSFf3vy96rZAODlYj3J4qs0cknyMoIB61bKAnrg VIFVVBHSpArLCAp3csf0qM258zj86sSsQeOlQhtz+tAEFztT5c5z1NV1I4RFKj+dTzZaQ4BJHpTm aIRouOe5xQARQLt5PNNJ2cFQeetCuxYr0p0gXAzkmgB0CN5m9lwtXCiOhB6kVWiEkjYI+Wre11QA nOOlAEHl+TcxgHiRSp+o6f1pWyDlB170XBO6IsvSRf14q2Ac4AxVS6MBixjYCcj6UnlAetSHOeTR /u9akCvLb4GUPTtSmJWX0NLOWQ/IppInJHK0AQLalHORx1+tI6nzcbCAO9X8YyT3qJjzwKAEjhDH Jzn3q1kIMCmAnA5zUbyg5FACSyjBzVUuXGVHFTMNw56VEQIxk8DrQBDOuVywyaiV9hC7sj+VSzy5 Q49KpooZjuJFAFzzzgc0eaTw3X2qmDu/i4FN80K+5Oo6+9ADrt90mCCeKWFk8lgw3Mv3famGSSaX CrzjpT3jwGQL16tQAESPCVIBBHWoo3uIZQMnI6VMW2oAjnj1o3tHIpZeCetAEjFseZISeehqEOGf aE2kDI96n4kyPvKT+VROCGyVDY4zQA22liecKxwe3FTSuwJCkq2eKaAA+6NcN1pu3Mxyu5M8UAOE rYbOC3b60395LHvL5+bGKX5IwW+6x7CoI2cOSq5H8qAJhbjduz5YWnmZo1UIxKn1qPfI0LZUEZyT TVmxgKNwAyQaAJlcLJjGcjPNI8oBHTpn605kQjAXDHHFI9uI9hzz2HpQBJtypBJHBxg8mqy7VUKh JYHjjrTid8+QSXznPpU87uSjKoX+8aAIDI4ZmQBQRgU2zRxNkHpVmOBJsyEjI5xTQjPMy/cUcEig CxJODIRLwf4QO9NdgQN3BPpUJj3MQG3behpscm4nAG9fyoAtRzwhQqrwvelkugRxyPWsstIZ9qkj cefT3q3KywgAtuPrQA5m3PnO5R1PpRLAjt+6w20c/WocoEzvwvWqysS5bcR60AWdgYEA5wKYsYHy k5IPWpoVU9DTyiqSAOT3oAJIFOfmBzyarltjfLyPSpX3N256fWozGSpY/wAR79qa3AQSSNCiDKg8 kj65qVpEVdrLleo4qFGVbYLyeBT3cG2Ayc9h7US3YETyySII0GBn0pXAaIpt+ahiwXLAKRxmkjUD PzE5HpSAtWfmgAN0U9aluGVs81DAJFOATg1JKmWHHNAFYxEgcEA1ZFqXKlTjNIUlKbeo7GpIZcR7 ehXrQAtw3lgZ5wO1R2qs0gbPTmkZwz56qOKntwBH0zmgCyrKCWPJqJyHyKYzENgH8KRmCrnNACFd gJzWe8jKG4yA5/nVmSUvyoG0HrVMl3YgDBLZ4+lUtmBK5jAUK2SaPK3MCTkqaFtmZxuXac9asSrt QKnOOvvUgQEnPX9KKdh/7lFAGiTlsnt0FSIRxjANc/b6lMqkP82Omatx6kjr8+Uz1oAtXkhKj0Dr x+Ip8b5PWqc00ckLhXBJHFIk37sHIwRVPYDTDAjI/Ckc4Xr+FUUulHBYZpWlDD7w5qQJTOFLKV69 6jB280zKjr1NIzjvg0AIS/m7h0H61PdMqxKW5PXNNjk3IduN3QGnCHzeGbhfzoAjtlaVy7D5QKfG PMc7unaleNosBZCoPbHWnQIqsDIWegC9CAFHHSnO6qORz1pkT+i4Hao5WWRjyQO9AEdxLvCBDn94 v86tF29aoCPF1Cg55LkfTj+tXS2B/SqeyAcCAOT1peMfKKYHXsMGhmI6d6kBplO/a68VICvULUbZ 9aZukB4THvQBYAA9hSsE+tRoGYfNSnGcUADA4wpwKgaM54NTcgYpoO0HIoAZggfNUcvIwT9KkJ3Z 5qCThD7UAUWZxIeBgcZqVIFMZYjk9TUQTc5zjHUjNL5rLGY1Ax1zQACMbiMgA9qR41AKgDPamSRs QHxk/WmR7owRggZ6UATiKSIqUb5+9NV5/mSSMc96IrlhMEC4z2p0sqiRsHDDrigBkqtHs4JU9cDp SFnO0BMj3qRBJMeZAAvNS28eJmyRgDlqAGYO5l24HoKjkAQExx7l+tTSPliIlz/eNNc7IwFY+4oA c8hY7QMM33hUJO0Evwc5HtVmNUZN5+UkcY7VHLF5qjccY6Ad6AIfLEjAoc7u/pU8gSOIBRnPBqRb cQgMjD356UwMZRIipxnkmgCuJgV2BMLnipYRFtJI5xgilEGFBxwe/agKgA+bIFAETq7EsR16Gpws 0jguCBt4HrUjoVACvkCp4EmL7nbc3cn0oApsrxSkrGfc0gkeU7ChI+lar9QcD3FOVlXp/KgClFbs G8x15xgVIYFPI+Ug1ZMnHBprKG6nNAFAQrHuyxC5pywjZ8jYJqbyfnAxkd8mrARP7o4oAx5I0Xk5 LCm7dzfc4rWkhWU5Kj60qRrEpxzQBjSpiMMigHPANPMSs43cNjIFW5Yo5XPAye/pUb221g27IWgC ONPJcYycHqTVxkSVQT973qGFAzjLHy1OTmrLyoCAhBB70AVzG8aMS/yjnFVE+Y56Z5x71oNBk5zj PWqsy+X8wUe9AEUautgHVQTjGfSoSwQqSuG7n0q1A7fZWXjYGP8AOqkkhWVIjjBNVLcBxuFkQpuO DzmkgZlkY7sgDvSyJG4AiUkDAOPWpEiBbaD8wXOKkB6zmMkkdOpqVrhNgY85qoN5VtwwM4z60ssf PygHH6UAXPtIAG0ZyOahkkCSjoWNVmLIq4b5jwWNOhibzOfmA6E0AWbf9/OdigL3q7sCJt/Km2Fv 5cTse5pX+bIzQBFhmfDH8DUk8KyAHODjB96WOJ5CeeR3qq1wUmKMRgHrQBJ9kXbkn8KWwt1YuxHA cgUrS714NLZvttQf7xJ/M1S2YFt0WozHGG3bRUZlJ4NAJIqQJsD1/Siovm9KKAObkh+cHdle+KdK u1QoU89OKmdQF+7yDTpXMm1eSBj5sUAUwgDYBOacWC7lzkdqeUPmEDBHfFRsFPAXHuKqPYCMFm+U fnT/ADCMDuD1p0S9RjPpSMhAAIOam1gH/apUON2Dmr0DecoOe3SsxYGb5mq9aDypSW4Ucc0AaMca qvy8Z61NbhVDDuaZGVZflIP0oi3/AGhVByO5oAvRwIfndee1L8qAkKKjuJiOBxiqjXRxzQBZ8zP4 0jexxUAcnn9KZK7OfIU8kfMR2FNagPtmLu8zdG+VT7D/ACamL4bJPFMKgIFAwB0qMseh5ob1AnWQ EY9TRnPf61EH4x3pC+DkdaQFlW54FPbJ79arq5HHrTkfLYHNAFjIUdc0wYJzTTktx2p6kYwTQAjZ A5FRMDnOKsFhTGyT0oAruO4qKYZ+Xpx1q6YyeSKTySTnAIoAx5IyhyMjIwfeoVVSM4Ibpit0woRg r0rLvLYqX2Nwf0oAkgjBjwTgDsKFBfKkd+oqrGz+WEGfc1MweJN6Sk8cigBtwVjkBQ7jUaMofbt2 7qVC5Ysqdec96tKm8AkZA+99KAIIVVNxJ6cLmgxeWNx4z0NSOUwQFOB+eKiZncYySByAaAJEkZIj GYxz3qKHzEl2seM06RnHAGT2PpTghjA3qCc0AKw8skqoJP6VA0rY3PkAc8d6kZ/vIV5NL9nkYIhU hOpoAYizSLvbhSakhkkXcqEKmMj3p8khjjZU6VXgUudxOA3cUAO8+UYEjZzwAKVQGQcAc45FKYCO cEqe/pUsW6Rtqqc96AJrC3YKSxyAeKtNLgkAdKYpEaYqJnOcigB7uxbOfwpu84FM3butMbLEKvbr QBOMY+bj2FKkmcnsKrs4mIGdopyt8wC8gUAWfN5xihj74qISc89aVz3PHpQA9XwcH8KV3B6DpVNp zuIHWlSUn6UAO8vc+QdtTBAvOelMVwTxyKexxyOaAFwjksfxFIqQj7qge1MVxxkc96egUgsT+FAC S8HcKr3BJQ5AyatZG3NQb1L7COKAKcaqpkDjO4AjP5VCbdiu5cAL05q1dxrmMseB8pI7CoWjZWyC WUetVLVJgLA3lAZAxik3qH3pywHSi2iErEucd6mnijD5Qbzjv2qQIxISuSpVfT1NOWIC2aV8bicD 1xim7/MjAbBxwc9cVK0IABZjtPSgCq6rI43OeBVv5BIqgYA/WiOy3cmluLVoMSMdxPSgC6ZAEAH4 U3PBPeqcU4OQRwBVyDbInJoAQBix7DHNRS2Synf90VbCKrZzmkkIIx0oAz51MMTFWzxgVLCpWMKf 4RgUyYZkjjHrub8KVSc89Kp6RSAkalRhTGfIwRTPmZutSBc3j0FFVcPRQBTjjXzmQ8n+dRu+1tuC P61KsiqmHIUjofWmS5G3kgds0ASJEnIAG0jjNU2tHJ4P0NT+UZFzGWOckc0sm6NlBwDjtQBElpKq bxyB1HejaXUkfz/SrEMjqhVgSSe9MdA6NtOSOOuKq6e4EJRo2XagGeoqYqz4U4yTUaRyMuccDg7f SrkK28kiGSUDZ2b5efxocWgIrWGSOTg/KDxWtaxEAu3U0xI4i/yFcdSc1O80MaAGRFA96VmBDMpf Iqm8bLxj8ama6Qt+7VpPoOPzpAsk5/eny1P8C9T+NPl7gMQsTsh+Zv4iei1NHEsYwuSc5J9TSsiL GEj+Ue1IGIQLxwetDfRAEuf4eSKaAcZNTNIpTA5PpTeD1FSBWkJQE5piysWwKsOUZhgcDqajYKrZ UYzQAsbde1T2wxljVYRnf7VajzjmgCSSVQccU7d2ziqLSbnOamEhC8GgCfzAucihZN33TzVdCHPP 409cBuDgUAWAWwSxpjSYPtSFh61G/wAwoAlDh+DzSTQCRf6VXhDIxz3q0rnuMfSgDPktJQSCODTX iEcQyT7DFaLk88de9IVUgbhkUAUspGRg5JHAplyxQfLkZ7Cra28JcMqgEd6sBE+8aAKsUTvBucYJ 6CpktkQbmALVLuB6UjFSTzQBH5UbNkoM1Dc2+9cL8wH6VKxwOKZEzMSMdPWgCCJWYlcdDyatmTkA Dp3pzAAYWohHhuTigAaOKXOU9qSOGK3yEXGakwF4FNzkGgBAR/dpS2O2PWkwevao2kPIPSgBS2fY VHITjimh13FQR65qAzgAvk5HagB6vtJyeaSWQEdcA96qvJIRyBg9aad7uoJOKALvlqFUbstVuJVW POfxqmQkUPT5uzU4OVhQgg560AWCqgE55NSKp24Jzj9Kpi4V1HH41JBMd33c880ALcQBRu/iqNVy oHQe9WHV5UxjBPWlS0fC7nJx2oASKM7cAYpXBXp1qyOFwB0qItu4x060AVlQkl84IpiyOrHJzmrh QY5FVZlKyZA4NADy/wAtVZZeMdD7VLjCnnk1ScNuyB8o7etAErOkkOwtk45pEmBiG48jimqrJtKk cD7tNYKJA0q4XPzgVS1VgHqHLFSA5PIp0Q2Jxkk88mnK0IDKoO4j5SPSnAlYM46cGpAS3tg/z7uC eVNT+VMMR7yR2qrbJuYKNxJPUdq1o4vKUEnJxzQAxlCoAeWWkASThuop7fP7UiBATjigBjWyAfdB qujtCSnvVyR9o5PFV5EEh+vegBjXBB4GasFlKByccc1BHEeQ3Y06ZfMYQL0GDIfQelNK7AbD8xeY j754+nanMNxxipSvb+VMC4Y4FDd2AwgDios7W3fpUrnrUDEDtSAn8w+g/OiqmfeigCEFROcHPHpS pGssoDncmeQBS/Z0Rc7iXxyc1LCRHG24KCe4oAbkKxSIbUHSo5hOoDFD14HrT3SaN0kc8np7U9rh ZXDr1WgCMCZyqsAi0siLkRqpBHJ96kFws4PZlpJHD4OQ2PWgAVhEjKVA45q7YlGDKygkdiOKrxQ+ ZD5kjZBPKVPGBGoxjHWjUCVooyc+XGB/uik8pMjaij32imGUk4HP9KfHuxyOfWndgIy/NgY/Cl4A y3aplQKMdPekeIMm3PFJ6gM8vOMN+FRSxB/lAqaUlQAp7YqKGQM2AOR3oAclsY0AJ4qFopDnaTUt xdYO0U3zcDOaAIi2zAZce9Keeg4NP81ScvineZGeM8UACBt43dKc5Owkd6aW2tnP0ppck5PFAEap j6mnIDvxQXCk7eaWNGkPFAChDmnMcD6VOwAXHfHWoNvGSefSgAQ5Gf0pRkimjIPtUwGR70ANA3c+ nWpUPHIpFQAehpwBA4oARlJ68igbRjIo3HvTWOelADJA7OCrYFLuOCGNRSlx06mnoNyDJ5oAUNxx Th83fmoWSRQfm460+EE4zQA9oyRjNOQ44x0pxOBTcHjA4NADic9aacYoIOeTTCRnrQAj5puaC1NJ oASR8ck1A8uIiCcFqS4cldi4Pr7VUIdiQXwBwKAEw5dQg78mp5VCKM4JpJiECBDuOOaFIb/WHK+l ADWZBtBHOeKmfO8FVGaYAC25sdcingBCWDEFu4oAbP8AdVcgZ6+9NliMq4VsbRTFw5PJz2GKdEjE rtjyT1zQAW1uuzdK5AB6VcMiq+IgDtFMWJNpRyT/ACFVg6QOwHTtQBrQTbsZHGOlSMQKoWkwH3if oatPIHwRQAu/rTQ2GpvJPtQeBxQBKW7+tVp3bjAyBRJJs56015A0e4nFAFecll2jr/OgwvFGpkYZ P8JqBrgowGM7TUxk3ANKA/PB9KAFHlkFgecd+1RNB5q8Ec0+P5Sx2A56+lPWMmMsPkGQPwoArr+4 chh7L7VMz5Q7hjPUVdhtkYEOobPr3qtcWjRH5MtEDnHUrVb+oBYR5OQvfOa0JWI6c471Xs2DMQhB A4qxJGAuc5PtU2sBGZMmnA/nUZX1pykA80AK67+DTNuBinseCSQB6moC7S8QjPrIRwP8aaQCvIUI RBmRug9Pc05FEabRyScsfU0iRCLOOWbqxPLU7acU27aAPVxigtTCvH0pgznAqQEf5iaruOTz1qaT 0zg1CwIxnp60AN2D1op/lr60UAQuFA2MzKcU61RcsjLvOM5PSoGKvN+9kyAfzqxFIsauM789PT8K AJZyXdUADEDt/SoSibNzZBHXB5prB9yEMOn40jQIhBY4OeaAGRLHLIoQHI6E1O8ahiFwT+ppFX5g VOWYdT6VLaoC5YsCU6Y6UAPRHSPDqMdRVmKPpk/hUTXWTtUdO1LuIIdmwT2oAmMZxkjGaVHBG0Hp URkZlO3k1C8j7CeQV74oAsyzYcBeaN5H41nSzCEpIDu/vVYt7lpW2525FAExO7kmoxINwjU49aJU wCQ+EHaqkcX70MD8uetAFplBxx071CeCcmrZAC8VUdCZQGyFNACMjccinHceB270jQxh+Dz2PpTy A8e0Mc9zQA1ZCV69KQs0tRssaHYCcU9GMQCtyx+6o6mmk3sA6KKQENngetWFuIoVO5sv6Dk1HseU ZlkwP7iHA/8Ar04SRRoVRQo9hTskAjXhbhYnOe5GKQXDAHMLZ+o/xqMOXYkdKXfxxyPWi67AL568 l1dAPVakjulYZRgcelRkgDrzTPJjk+Y8MO460e6wNJGOAzYwalyMdKzlkeHBlO+MfxDqPrVjzlbG 3kGk1YCQrkk0AlKQS5HvTZJKQBI/Bzyarws281MMtwtSxwBOSMmgBqqxbJ6VKBx8tI2cY6CkBJ6d KAFzg4NL0oyoFNbnoeKAByMGqzHBqygqCWIliR0oAj3cUxpCiFj+FO2le1V7xgIwM0LUCm0xG52H JpVCy5YHHHSocs33c7e/FTRw5+9nI7ZquVdQGYZCC79eDzTmkG3hxx0waezxrgeWBjqAKesCyINu dpo90CKOUsWXd261PE48oIBlgck0NbRlCEwSOtMEQHyxsVPfnii0QHRACbKn6+1WSrk7lwSO/rVU logN4GB1YdDTozIykxnah7UmmgEa7kAYBOMkGmrh1VyBlafCNuVKAkd6GRNhKrnPSkBo2aJIpdlG T0zUkigD5eg61HaRGO3HPWlfPU0ARMxpDJ39KeGFQyqUwwOQaAB2D4UctSy27tGBjHFMiIRi561Y EwbnPFAFNIwwIY5K9j1NRmFkj3AYzzVuWEzOHQ8gdalaN2jCyZx6UAU4lAjzu5xVi3XzcZwFWp1t 4dgXYBS+XGiEIMUASYwoC9KQbeSw4NRb8Dr0prMSOtADnihLblTaw/iU4NMKzAcTBh6Ov+FAJwT2 pQ/r+FVzMBoM/QiP8zTds543ov0BJqXfz607BYcUcwEHkgnMjNIR6nj8qnUHoDx6VGQwPNOQ4OaT bYExUMMHqKjf0x0pQxJ68U7APWkA0AEccE03PODwadK2F4HTvVYOZBkHmgBt0uSCKNjPEVHBA4qU Dru5qRVIPSgCj5Ld2aitD8KKAMbyInbP3R65q2kGfugcfd9BTWiBlRtoKn045prFxNkYBBwTnpQA 9iqOocbpBzmnLHHMDJtGd2PrSL++y8gyRwDUtsrljtTCA80ARRrGsu3k5457VcS2jQZ2jHX602OI JIZGB/Gm3E7FwOxoAnSKMgkDGahlt1GGDkntk1Ig2DIPNQyspBLdewoAWJAq4z0HamBWZWZjwe1N ATAR+CegFXobY4/up2A70AZogVlYP27VPb27scxoRxjJrSS3iU5CjPqaecCgCoLP5cM5JNPW1iGA FBxU5dQKjZ8UAKyjGAKha3jJyVyak38UzfQAPFGcDbUclsm3CipRJShxQBQnthHHuzls4A9TUP2a SFmeQb2q/kSXo4+WJf1P/wBb+dWSFYZOM1T0AyS5KjPBpsTLI2COO9XZrUMCR1NU/KNtnIJzUgJO 6INsZ+b0qM5CAjn1pq7DIzZqQkGAnOaAEBDpuLdO1SQnuc57CoYgFjDEZ71btiJMMy4ANAE8JBHz LzVYjyJdyjETHp6GrwljxgAVHK0cimM4ww5ppgMY4FMRjI3OSBSQNmHMnLDKn6ipVbgEChqzAsp8 q8ClJPriovOIxjikMhJ+akBK7ADNQPLngcClaQdOtQswzQBMnzdTxUi7TVXfkcU9d3U0AWshaYWB qDzOetNlmEalm6enrTSuA2eQRnABLnoo71m3B3TYdvn/AEFacMJUGSTmRuvt7VnXQVLk55pt20QD MtE4QnJPpU6ToVAI+73quEA2yOec8U5U8w5H3c1IEzAMWYfNSicLHt2DBOKY2E78Y4qCaUbBsOSO TQBfk2DgHGRyKgiUfMCcH1qBJlZRJkl84qf77AqOB60AKgXaQefrRJtiB2HAPVexoXL/ALsjaxPF EsLOhyMY65pp2AFAcq8fRetP3GRlyucGo4m2/Mi5A4YeoqR5GK4iGVPOPahrqgLUUrKCrcDFBm3c A1BGrtIgQcHqO1XTbIVy3FICjOzFvkp8UbyIyE4FWlii9Minl1AwBxQBRZMZRV2kflRAheQq3Srh wcZGfemyKuMAY96AJYkVBwKe7ccGq6yYOAaUn1P0oAceRUZBU4z+NAzznpSMc9KAGM2Dgc0i5xz0 7UrJlge4oIPTtQAdcg9O9NYndxTuuaTFAD4yAcnrUm/HNQKMHnp707d6d6ALAO8D3pCnoPxqNHKj A71Jv/CgCM/IPr3p6nj5u/SlIG05qNiFIzQA91BXoKg8rZyoz71aXBGexoIOT2oArBXY7jwakBAH U1JsBprABeO9ACeYPWijYlFAFJ5/LdS2MnGabgTOW7g9PWohIZXOFAAPerUDL5iheG6GgCeKCTzd 3CpjFXQQqDgf41GQD9B0pskgxgUAMnk3Nt7VBt/ec8/0om+Qgk9elRxNu5PWgC1zxgVA0ZBLN949 BQznORxip7ONpHLSDI7UALY2gX944yx7mroJ7gDHSlJAOBwKax560ALuA+tML4pDTKAEJppOTSk/ hTc0AHU0hBzijPNITz7UAOK4FJ2ozmkzQBHA372f1L8/kKsK2OaqgBLs+ki5H1FTjHaqluBKWyKg lGVIYcGpBj1odQy+9SBnTWuFzuIHtUMCAuQvSr5IXKMOtRALCx3DigCuyhVO05A60RSjZyTntUcr JvJ6fSnlR5QZKADzDmnoW3DHNRxRSSONo4rVjhWGIu4HAyTQBBaxbvNz038/kKn8tU5JptrE/k5Y YLksfxp7KWOPSqluAwuDwO9RM56VK2RwRULr3qQG+YccmoGkLP1qvfzMjBR2pIpNwypoA0IyoHNT FxtxmqKyc4NTDn6UASDrUQ/ez5PKx8D3NErbI2YHkDilt12RAHr1qlogLS8LWTqDEy9NtaSt3rGv md7pgnIqQFYuV65x0pT5ohV1PyknNMRCF2uuGNTRBFiZWOWPFADcRuQASx75okWLBQr83qPSpnjU Luj64xVdlcAORyeKAH2yoGEeeBzUs75bbH24pqRlhvI2jGDzU0UQU/Jgg0ALHOAVDZBB6026nDjA GR6065BxgqMDvVdlDJkjBNADrebYMbe9PiYBmiPRuRTlUoE3jA7VDLtDiQcFTnmqXYDStx5XX+Kp ZmO0YFVopvMl2gZAq26ZUdqnZ2AhD4OKN/NBTk5pABQA7dzgUMCV4opQc0AQlzuA7CnjJ5/KmyA5 zinKM9KABs4yp470LnHNKe+KAOPSgBoPzEUp570rDj3pMADrQAnYY/GlyMYppIzjJxQMsvFACsM4 J603BDHtSkkc00nB45oAcCfxp6nH3qZ2pynHXmgBd+aeCM5NMBGfehuRxQBKW4pA+DzmmA8DNI2f XNAEhm546U3fURHalBIHNAEmaKj3j0ooAqpCjDkdPWpoIQH+UZpzDjC80qzBG2qv1NAFsRkKM447 VVmOw8jFTq7M2T36Cq11IclWxzQAxwHHzc+hpOFTJpEBKlfXpzUbKRJsLZoAkhzIQOBnpWzGuyMD 2qlYwqz7xxirrnnBoACf1prcCgkD3phPGaAEY0360dTTW7+1ACk889aaSO1JuyRmkY88CgBaCaaX HSl4xQAmaM470mabwelACTDzF+XhgcqfQ0sU28HPDDgqeopqZBOabKm47lO1x0P+NUnfRgWM+lPX nrVVJzH8sy7Pccg1YRwwyDx60rNAPkjEikHg1SmgK8FuKvAg96in5QgUgMt0CEfMDipEkEgCDpUP lNI54wQatW4WFsynHt3/ACoSYFyzg2fM3TtTppPtD+Sv+qU/OfX2po82ZcAGKL/x4/4U/aqKFQAK OgFV8IE4bP0qOQ5pN2B1oGGqQG7gRhqjfr7VP5S9xQUwOlAGLqEDFt6jIxVaBtvXitxouDu71my2 hDEqO9AERb5hj61Yjk461VZdj9DUqct/OgCablFH95gKmxg1DnLRA9N39DU5bZyRxVPZADZVPTIr LLFJf9rsfWtjaHiyKzLmAqSwPNSBGZDIGDj5/Wogj5XGc+lKztlSTyKsW0vnOA3GD1oAR2kZgehA 5FWN4kjXPGOtV3UvIWAqZXjVdrKM47UAMkO1cEkg9BViKZYIxheMVEzhF3BcDpzUUjMSGZdo/nQB IZGuGLdEoLLlRxxQzEKAy/L6U4QBkwp7UANJkadS54HIp8gWXcTycYxSeQVxljuPSkEcgyG6etCA tacAYVYde9XWb5T7Vn2LbIDjk5P86slzwKqW7AVjkdKZyDS8npzQfepATJp6imKeafuJoAXbmoM7 WxU2c0jKCcmgBnJpTkdKRjtz2pokAIB70ASZPSmBecVJxjjpQee1AET9P5UpJA5qUheQOCRUQTBO 786AIwWY+1B7U8qMZFNIyTmgAzxmlzSfXpR0570AKrGlD5NRt+lGcDgUAWA/GO1JnjGeKg3Zp4bi gBzHHA6U1WyaXIPB703bjGO1AD/yopNq0UADNhsbuPSgsrE7UBI71CV+bLdccmm7y0RSMZxQBNDM yliW57VExZ5SznefU0kQJXHem4CzbAc5oAn2hkA6GoXQKdwbkd6nxtGD19BTRAGkUE5yelAGjZKV twW6nmpugzTlAVQPQCmPQAzqaCKM4pjH3oAGIpme1B6UzPNACkUUZ9KaTigBrcmlGT1peOtN3jmg BS2OKb75xTS1GR3oAeWpBz1poP6UFjQA/IAwelQm3XOU3Jn+6cVITmlU4pptANRJh0nJ/wB4ChxM TjzR/wB81JuGKRiCuRT5mBT8ty+DIxz6cVat4QoOFwfU8mkjC7vU1bQ7R060czAVM4x7Uxhg9eam Q8ciopcA8VIDR6GnZ21FkDvSk+hoAlElG/uaiHNOORQApkEgxTFDA4YZFKefrSrz3zQAye3WUZAG arfZmA461eGBx3pR34oAoPbmPymPPzgfnxVsxhhgjikuY2e3cL94DK/UdKenzRrInKsM1XRAIvyD GKzbiVQzL39K0pGAXNYTASzsSeQakBXO3BZBzTI22EsvHtU0gzjnOKrlVB44JoAmacg529ajyRKp znJ5BpX3EevpUuxcBm4oAcySTAY6CpCsisBI3AHHFOM6CFQAAR3oTe5OcNnuaAHhVkIIAaoJT5Uv JOfSnJ5iOApwSabKd74frnmgCWKQtHkjJzxTyW2kHrUBO0DGCRzxT2djbHByzcfnTW4FjT0DRL78 1aMSqpAqOCLyVx+FOY5xzQ92AzGDRngilJpv1pAJjHNKDmmN7UgbFAEm7FOzketR9aFoAc/zKe9Q q3PtU2cj2qoTtcjtQBYVgenWkMpz04pqtxmn5Dfe69jQBKhyMkUrEH6U1cDFHHORQAxhhf5Uztmp S3amFcigAblelRkgAU8ggdeBUZG4jHUUANO4nHanKD0NO6Dk0FttACYx1xikz6dKRvmGW6ULwPag BTjOacHwKrmUFyo9aeq4oAl5opmWooArM7yEL608pIiYRsetWvKjHIOMCoJQQMr06/WgBkT7BtZj k9aeAM4zz+tQPKd6SMOnWnCUtOPzoAsgDk5yegp9ofMvFJ6AVWLYYHHJPBq/pq5cmgDQYjA9KjLf lUjdKjNAEbGkJ4xSsaZnjJoAbn1ppNKTTSRQA3JFIeepo9abnLfSgBT7GkxkZNDnAyKQHdQAgPOO lBowN2TSkigA9KXNMBpc0ALupwOaaKM4NADyM0hPqaUHIpjHnmgBqyAS5q2km45qhIO4oinweeKA NJmHrUZIOah87IqN5goPNADZJfnIz0pv2rHAqvI4LZpoIoA04Zg2M1Nkc1mI5BGK0oUyuWNAADg8 04RZ5BpdgqQDFADVXFO2HFB4pjzEUASdBjtVaB/LZ4D0HzL/ALpp/m5qGZSwDp99OR7+1UuwD5F4 NY+0JMcg8mtTzVeMMDwf0qrdSpHEzHBPQVOwFdwq/NyM02JFeP5xyDwfWqMlw7nrgegrRi8wwqV6 kUAIwDEAD60sib1CAVJEFydx+bvUkIzN1yBQBVdcDaecCiGTAK5IrRliQ81VNsAxKc0APTeqjABJ 6GmeWJdzM3zDjFG51UbR0qWGIuNx4oAWCBNrHuBxRbx7rrgfKnJ+vapHHlAbRl24A9TUsSiFAvfq x9TVLRAS4JNNZAOakDZGRSEZqQITkdOlIRg1Lt2/Wozj8aAGHNMY0/d60yTrQAm7nrS5zUSg556U /PFAD92BioJeWBFNdyaUdOTzQBKhyOaOhxmolOKfnOD3oAmUk9adk1CD0JNPDEnJoAd1GKbuwaQn 2pgYZoAezYIJGR1xTNwILAdTwKkVuKa5GOKAFXvinMhU4I6VFGDg5NSSMTyTk0ARswHFNJyMkU7I B4FBAxzQAwRAndjntT9tKn3ce1B+770AG72oqHcfQ0UASRhpN0j5GO1PUg8MM5qzC4ZcKO1D7Fzn pQBmSoJJNq05bfyuRycVa3KGJQYPY1E5IHXn0oAimG1wmARV/TSA20dhzVEhmcH86v2RCS7R6UAX pORg9e1RZIqRyT9KjzQBG2KjbJ47VJnOajJ54oAa3GAKRuegpzYHNRn1zQAZzSbdozTc/hQznbgm gBpOTSg4pB0pOnWgBetJj3opCcUAKcgUvUZppFPB9aAAHFKcUw04UAOBwKQmgGjPNAEbruqBkx0q yxqIjvQBESR0NQsTnrUzDNRMOaAGEZ60BwvWlaoHLA0AaVmokbPGK1IlAFc7ZXBhkHoTzW4Jw0YK mgCwQpPWjOO9VDISaeJDjrQBOWwKYxBFM3+tIWoATGKAfWmtgDJOKzb3UF2lIjz0zQAy9uMTN5TY B647mqMjsw+aoySetKDxzVXT3AStuyZXgX6Vi4z0q3YT+W+xjgGk00Bq+Wg/gBNTQxCMZx9aIgCQ amY46UgKsisQf0ogjkjO7PB61MHC8kZNKrhVLOwVT6nigCBojKSAO/WpgVgQA5JPCqOp+lBmLjEK YB/jfgfh60sUSr8+4u7dWNVa24BHGQTJJgyH8lHpUoGeooAwcmlIyevFJu4CcA08tgfypMDoaZK4 AwKQDXcn6004pN2TSPwuaAI3OWIFIemDQzcg1EWxuOQT2oAexx3qC5l2KdvJxUMczbyGJ3HoKY29 ps84xg0AKj5UyEnIqQOTj6ZqBiQSFHbFOi+dSoyMUAW1bOOaY8vlngZNLGNqgComicscjKmgCWOU sMsMGntJgc0xEITHpUUofOMfSgCyshYdOKTODUcZKqBjnvUzjK4oAVX3HFKcD73FInCiq10GJU9i cUAWhIOgIpryqASG5rODMQOcYoIZVHfOTQBd85RyeM0jXBHG3nFVSu4AjqRT1Yq/zHORigCaOVmb aOSanDbjtbhh19qopIwkBTjBwaleXBPy5Ydf8/hQBa8v/aoqtyehH50UAaajbzUcmMj36U+H5nOe aZIo3dKACMIHPmD5ahmVTIfL5FSkfJQqgJwKAEhUA8jip4sCUEDFRHtUkZ6UAXGA/GmNjvTh/So3 60AMb2qI/ezUrdKioATsaT60U096AGvg009KDTDQAu7FFNPanUAICRSkj8aOtNPXNADs5peO9MNO PQUAKDk4pelC0h60AKKCcUL3oagBCT2prU4/dpp6CgCNuajYdalNRvQBA/NR4zT260xuKAI3j5yO KsW12YgVY8VD7UxhQBrJMrjIIqVT3JxXPK7KeGIqx58vHzmgDb3gdSKglu4kz81ZEkrkcsagLE9z QBcur5pcqvC1Tpw7UhHyigBKOlFHegAzShiKQ0lNNoDYsZnkjwJiGHbANXT5pH+tH/fFYmnsRcjB 69a3VGQKfMwI/JkcjfM2PYAVIluinJXLerHJqdRxSrS52A0kqPmHWnoo4xSOchR2p/TpSAdgLUEz 7alHSoJOetACK/rTWb1pR3pkvSgBy9aVuRzSJ92lPegCpPMFO3oarAndkMfqKW55n5pYPuPQBE5K OpJ5PcdaeHJX5hjtk96jj5fJ5qeYAx80ADKpAGdre1PSLHIHJ70iqCkZI5xVuPtQBFEM9aftDHpU gUelAAznvQAxYwvakKgkr+OamccVG3AoAaEGfehl4NIhOaeeRQBX3+p6nihiPLPmY9uar3bMsigH FI4yoPtmgBkpHBRf96pYxGV3FhvB6elRr80DZ5wKq7jtdsnOev50AXgylD/eBODTHBEYYj73IPvV dWPkk5ORVp/+PGM+p5oAQphFJHB5B96bFJGoLDOQPm3dakYlhGp5HpSsijgKMc0AMCTsMgKAeRzR VlYY9o+QdKKAP//Z ------=_NextPart_000_001F_01C40E35.0F9E3AA0-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Mar 20 11:22:22 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2KJMHLw019556; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 11:22:18 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2KJMETH019538; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 11:22:14 -0800 Resent-Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 11:22:14 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net (Unverified) Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 10:28:04 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: Asteroid flyby tonight Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53620 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Let me try that again with fewer typos and cutting/pasting of URL problems. Sorry! At 10:12 AM 3/19/4, Vince Cockeram wrote: >Horace, I caught this rediculous statement too. >Couple of questions. >What would a 100 ft. diameter (assume basalt) rock mass? >How fast is this bugger going with respect to the earth. >F=MA :) Well I trusted the calculations at the bottom of the web page at: However, since you mentioned it, I tried a computation from scratch as follows. You can conservatively assume an asteroid will impact the earth at around earth escape velocity. Anything higher simply means larger energy upon impact (assuming of course it is not in earth orbit and the earth is chasing it.) Escape velocity for earth is 11.18 km/s. Density of rock Rho can be assumed to be about 3 times water or 3 g/cm^3 = 3000 kg/m^3. The radius of the object is (100 ft/2) = 15.24 m. The mass of the object m = rho (4/3) Pi (r)^3 = (4/3) * 3.14 * (3000 kg/m^3) * (15.24 m)^3 = 4.45x10^7 kg. The energy is E = (1/2) m v^2 = (1/2)(4.45x10^7 kg)(11.18 km/s)^2 = 2.78x10^15 J. A kiloton of TNT = 4.184 x 10^12 J. The energy is thus (2.78x10^15 J)/(4.184 x 10^12 J/kT) = 665 kilotons TNT, a little less than you get by scaling the guestimate provided on the above web page. Of course if you assume just a bit more velocity than escape velocity you get right back up to about 1 megaton TNT. It's in that ballpark for sure. If you happen to be in the impact area I doubt the difference will be significant! 8^) Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Mar 20 11:52:30 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2KJqOO3019169; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 11:52:25 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2KJq7lm019126; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 11:52:07 -0800 Resent-Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 11:52:07 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Reply-To: From: "Keith Nagel" To: Subject: RE: Asteroid flyby tonight Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 15:17:28 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal X-Rcpt-To: Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53621 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Hey, Three thoughts come to mind. 1) There was a time when this was a regular occurance on the planet. Now, fortunately, that time has passed. The likelyhood of another large impact increases in the short term as time goes on, but decreases in the long term as we take more hits. Thankfully, we're long past the real hazard period back when the planets were forming. 2) It's common knowledge that the Soviet scalar weaponry program psychically projected a nuclear explosion over Tunguska with the help of Albert Einstein and Nikola Tesla (grin). But just bear with me for a moment of wild speculation; what if it was a medium sized meteor strike instead? Being at ground zero would have hurt, but the resulting damage was nowhere close to apocalyptic. If we're remarkably unlucky a populated area would get it, but much more likely it would land in the middle of nowhere. Anyway, it's a good case study to understand what one of these events would probably look like. 3) It will be an interesting side effect of cheap access to space, that nuclear weapon technology will be largely supplanted by the space equivalent of Dennis the Menaces slingshot. For it's a trivial task to find a nice size rock and nudge it towards the infidel great satan/terrorist nation of your choice. Given our history, I expect the first major meteor strike of the modern era will be artificial. Toodles, K. -----Original Message----- From: Horace Heffner [mailto:hheffner mtaonline.net] Sent: Saturday, March 20, 2004 2:28 PM To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Asteroid flyby tonight Let me try that again with fewer typos and cutting/pasting of URL problems. Sorry! At 10:12 AM 3/19/4, Vince Cockeram wrote: >Horace, I caught this rediculous statement too. >Couple of questions. >What would a 100 ft. diameter (assume basalt) rock mass? >How fast is this bugger going with respect to the earth. >F=MA :) Well I trusted the calculations at the bottom of the web page at: However, since you mentioned it, I tried a computation from scratch as follows. You can conservatively assume an asteroid will impact the earth at around earth escape velocity. Anything higher simply means larger energy upon impact (assuming of course it is not in earth orbit and the earth is chasing it.) Escape velocity for earth is 11.18 km/s. Density of rock Rho can be assumed to be about 3 times water or 3 g/cm^3 = 3000 kg/m^3. The radius of the object is (100 ft/2) = 15.24 m. The mass of the object m = rho (4/3) Pi (r)^3 = (4/3) * 3.14 * (3000 kg/m^3) * (15.24 m)^3 = 4.45x10^7 kg. The energy is E = (1/2) m v^2 = (1/2)(4.45x10^7 kg)(11.18 km/s)^2 = 2.78x10^15 J. A kiloton of TNT = 4.184 x 10^12 J. The energy is thus (2.78x10^15 J)/(4.184 x 10^12 J/kT) = 665 kilotons TNT, a little less than you get by scaling the guestimate provided on the above web page. Of course if you assume just a bit more velocity than escape velocity you get right back up to about 1 megaton TNT. It's in that ballpark for sure. If you happen to be in the impact area I doubt the difference will be significant! 8^) Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Mar 20 14:54:57 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2KMsoLw001956; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 14:54:50 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2KMshsD001839; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 14:54:43 -0800 Resent-Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 14:54:43 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f From: FZNIDARSIC aol.com Message-ID: <154.309ae25b.2d8e25ae aol.com> Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 17:54:38 EST Subject: I planing on going to Weppons Lab this Tuesday for a lecture To: vortex-l eskimo.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_154.309ae25b.2d8e25ae_boundary" X-Mailer: 7.0 for Windows sub 10712 Resent-Message-ID: <_nWwu.A.mc.yuMXAB ultra5.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53622 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: --part1_154.309ae25b.2d8e25ae_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I plan to hand out this letter when I get there. Frank Znidarsic Frank Znidarsic 481 Boyer St. Johnstown PA 15906 fznidarsic aol.com Fellow researcher Greetings; I have studied several zero point processes. I came to the conclusion that these processes involve "the path of the quantum transition." The cold fusion process involves 50 nanometer sized clusters. These clusters are stimulated thermally at a frequency of about 10 exp 14 hertz. The gravitomagetic experiments of Potkletnov involved a 1/3 of a meter superconducting disk. This disk was stimulated at 3 megahertz. Sono-fusion involves nanometer sized clusters. These clusters are stimulated at visible frequencies. The product of the cluster size and the stimulation frequency is one megahertz- meter. My theorem states, "The nuclear, gravitational, and electromagnetic motion constants converge in a Bose condensate that is stimulated at a dimensional frequency of one megahertz-meter." The convergence of the motion constants allows quantum states to change. Znidarsic's theorem describes the path of the quantum transition. A detailed analysis of this process from nuclear to macroscopic sizes may be found on my web page. http://www.angelfire.com/scifi2/zpt/index.html Znidarsic's constant ( one megahertz-meter ) is associated with wavelength. Planck's constant is associated with frequency. Both constants describe the quantum transition. Znidarsic's constant in Planck's system of units describes a spin one Boson. Energy barriers are eliminated within the Bosonic state due to the convergence of the motion constants. This concept can be applied to the design of technology. This technology could directly control the nuclear and the gravitational forces. I have several nuclear and gravitational processes that I would like to explore. I seek partners in this effort. --part1_154.309ae25b.2d8e25ae_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I plan to hand out this letter when= I get there.

Frank Znidarsic


Frank Znidarsic
481 Boyer St.
Johnstown PA
    15906
      fznidarsic aol.com
Fellow researcher
Greetings;

I have studied several zero point processes.   I came to the concl= usion that
these processes involve "the path of the quantum transition."  The cold= fusion
process involves 50 nanometer sized clusters.  These clusters are stimu= lated
thermally at a frequency of about 10 exp 14 hertz.   The gravitoma= getic
experiments of Potkletnov involved a 1/3 of a meter superconducting disk. This disk was stimulated at 3 megahertz.  Sono-fusion involves nanomete= r
sized clusters.  These clusters are stimulated at visible frequencies.&= nbsp; The
product of the cluster size and the stimulation frequency is one megahertz-<= BR> meter.  My theorem states,  "The nuclear, gravitational, and elect= romagnetic
motion constants converge in a Bose condensate that is stimulated at a
dimensional frequency of one megahertz-meter."  The convergence of the<= BR> motion constants allows quantum states to change.  Znidarsic's theorem<= BR> describes the path of the quantum transition. A detailed analysis of this process from nuclear to macroscopic sizes may be found on my web page.

http://www.angelfire.com/scifi2/zpt/index.html

Znidarsic's constant ( one megahertz-meter ) is associated with wavelength.<= BR> Planck's constant is associated with frequency.  Both constants describ= e the
quantum transition.  Znidarsic's constant in Planck's system of units d= escribes
a spin one Boson.  Energy barriers are eliminated within the Bosonic st= ate
due to the convergence of the motion constants.  This concept can be ap= plied
to the design of technology.  This technology could directly control th= e
nuclear and the gravitational forces.  

I have several nuclear and gravitational processes that I would like to expl= ore.
I seek partners in this effort.

--part1_154.309ae25b.2d8e25ae_boundary-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Mar 20 17:32:21 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2L1WGLw030870; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 17:32:16 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2L1WFNR030856; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 17:32:15 -0800 Resent-Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 17:32:15 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 16:38:07 -0900 To: , From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: RE: Asteroid flyby tonight Resent-Message-ID: <4B0shD.A.EiH.eCPXAB ultra5.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53623 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 3:17 PM 3/20/4, Keith Nagel wrote: >Hey, > >Three thoughts come to mind. > >1) There was a time when this was a regular occurance on the planet. >Now, fortunately, that time has passed. The likelyhood of another >large impact increases in the short term as time goes on, but decreases >in the long term as we take more hits. Thankfully, we're long >past the real hazard period back when the planets were forming. That may be so, but what happened shortly after the earth formed is not of any significant concern. It is irrelevant. It is the record of the last 1/8 of the earth's lifetime that is of concern. There have been a lot of big hits during that period, some associated roughly with mass extictions. There is no solid evidence that I know of that the frequency of those major hits has been diminishing with time. On the other hand, I think it is possible to formulate a reasonable argument that the impact rate is fairly steady. There is a lot of documentation (and controversy) on the web regarding major extinctions. However, one source of information that might be used is: One might assume from the above information that there were significant events around the time of the start of each of the folloing periods. (All times and periods in millions of years.) Cambrian 570 -500 70 * Ordovician 500-430 70 * Silurian 430-395 35 Devonian 395-345 50 * Carboniferous 345-280 65 Permian 280-225 55 * Triassic 225-195 30 * Jurassic 195-136 56 Cretaceous 136-65 79 * Tertiary 65-present 65 * general agreement on extiction Tere are essentially 5 events in each of the last two 300 million year periods (600-300, 300-present). If we take only the periods in which it is generally agreed that major extinction events occurred we get the following pattern: Cambrian 570 70 * Ordovician 500 105 * Devonian 395 115 * Permian 280 55 * Triassic 225 86 * Cretaceous 136 144* In this perspective there are 3 events in each of the last 300 million year periods. I don't see any evidence of events disappearing with time. On the contrary, there appears to be a cyclic pattern to the event durations, and, depending on how you look at it, it may be that we are somewhat overdue for an event. The risks of a major event in the near future might in fact be fairly large. We have even witnessed a major solar system collision event in our lifetimes: Shoemaker-Levy. Further, we seem to be having a lot of near misses lately. Something important about near-misses is that the bodies involved sometime get their orbits affect so as to guarantee a direct hit at a future time. That is because a near miss is not all that different from a sngle body exploding. If an astronaut loses a wrence, for example, letting it drift off into space, it very likely will be back at a later time when the orbits mutually intersect. Wen two bodies exchange momentum there is a similarity to them each being part of the same mass at one time. I am not sure, but it sounds familair that Shoemaker-Levey had a close encounter with Jupiter prior to impacting on it. BTW, I was aquainted with Gene Shoemaker. He seemed to love parties. He came to a party at my house back in the late 60's, and brought a bottle of Ever-Clear (or the equivalent.) He liked to go to Australia periodically where he would let off steam. He enjoyed driving at high speed down the middle of the road in the Outback, because it was deserted ... except for the occasional tandem rig. > >2) It's common knowledge that the Soviet scalar weaponry program >psychically projected a nuclear explosion over Tunguska with >the help of Albert Einstein and Nikola Tesla (grin). But just bear >with me for a moment of wild speculation; what if it was a >medium sized meteor strike instead? The Tunguska body was actually pretty small, and probably a comet, made mostly of ice. Tunguska was only about a 10 megatons TNT event. Tunguska does demonstrate, however, that the energy even from a non-impact air blast can have a significant effect. >Being at ground zero >would have hurt, but the resulting damage was nowhere close >to apocalyptic. Well, yes, but it was just a small hit. Medium hits could cause tidal waves and major geologic events that could wipe out large segments of earth's population, and major ecosystems as well. If you look at the Hawaiian islands, for example, and consider the drift of the continental plates, you have to wonder if the Island chain evolved due to a magma "hot spot" being punched into the earth's crust by a large meteor. One also has to ponder just how big on the Richter Scale earthquakes can get, and whether a sufficiently large impact can trigger all the stressed major fault zones on earth at one time. Large hits could of course trigger shrouding of the earth, global firestorms, and a major extiction. >If we're remarkably unlucky a populated >area would get it, but much more likely it would land >in the middle of nowhere. Anyway, it's a good case study >to understand what one of these events would probably look like. Yes, but ony a fairly small event invoving a body that fully or mostly ablated before impact. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Mar 20 22:08:35 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2L68WbA022166; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 22:08:32 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2L68UF2022150; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 22:08:30 -0800 Resent-Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 22:08:30 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 21:13:09 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Nemesis speculation Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53624 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: It has been speculated at various times that a cloud or swarm of asteroids and/or comets exists which tends to all return at once. Such a swarm could be created by various means. One is that a heavy but fairly dark object, a dark or small star might periodically traverse or might have at some time traversed our neighborhood and disrupted the Ort cloud, sending numerous bodies sunward at the same time. Another hypothesis is that a planet exploded. In particular, the planet that exploded, or disintegrated due to a major impact, might have existed between Mars and Jupiter, where the asteroid belt now lies. In that case debris might be all over the solar system. However, the more extremely energetic fragments would end up having orbits with large eccentricities, and long orbital periods. None of this is new. The swarm has been referred to as the Nemesis Swarm, or Nemesis Cloud. A Nemesis Swarm might explain some extinctions for which no major impact area has been found. That is because the extinction might have been caused by many smaller impacts of which there is no obvious geologic record. If the cloud consists of many small comets, it might even explain Noah's flood of 40 days and 40 nights, due to the rain of water which would result from a cloud of small comets burning up in the atmosphere. [Really not in Kansas any more with that speculation!] Of much more interest is the possibility that meteor impacts may play a role in solar activity, and even sunspots. The motion of the plasma of the sun is governed by complex differential equations, in a manner somewhat like terrestrial weather, yet that motion is far more complicated than the weather due to the system not being merely mechanical, but also electromagnetic, as well as far more energetic. Therefore asteroid or comet impact on the sun is a prime candidate to cause the Butterfly Effect, the effect where a very small perturbation can result in large feedback cycles that produce large events. The effect is so named because it is said the flap of a butterfly's wing can be the ultimate cause of a hurricane. It may be possible that a swarm of nearly simultaneous impact events on the sun, even though not directly upon the earth, could affect the weather for long periods, and even initiate or change the sunspot cycle frequency. Such a solar event would produce limited geological evidence of its existence, and even less of its cause, yet could in fact cause a major extinction. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Mar 20 22:25:41 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2L6PabA024070; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 22:25:36 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2L6PZht024059; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 22:25:35 -0800 Resent-Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 22:25:35 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 21:30:16 -0900 To: , From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: RE: Asteroid flyby tonight Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53625 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Typos, typos, typos! Hopefully this is a bit more accurate table, at least arithetic wise. Cambrian 570 70 * Ordovician 500 105 * Devonian 395 115 * Permian 280 55 * Triassic 225 89 * Cretaceous 136 136* Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 21 03:19:17 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2LBJAKA019170; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 03:19:11 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2LBJ8Td019153; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 03:19:08 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 03:19:08 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <000a01c40f36$55c7bae0$0500a8c0 nixlaptop> From: "Nick Palmer" To: "Vortex-L" Subject: Test - ignore Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 11:19:07 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0007_01C40F36.538F5710" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53626 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C40F36.538F5710 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Test - please ignore ------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C40F36.538F5710 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Test - please=20 ignore
------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C40F36.538F5710-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 21 08:13:49 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2LGCOgX001804; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 08:13:45 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2LGCMLG001794; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 08:12:22 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 08:12:22 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.1.4.030702.0 Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 11:15:55 -0500 Subject: U.S. DoE Will Review 15-Years of "Cold Fusion" Excess Heat and Nuclear Evidence From: "Eugene F. Mallove" To: "vortex l eskimo.com" CC: Eugene Mallove Message-ID: Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ultra6.eskimo.com id i2LGCLgX001771 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53627 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: From: New Energy Foundation, Inc. March 20, 2004 (A Nonprofit, 501(c)(3) Corporation) www.infinite-energy.com U.S. Department of Energy Will Review 15-Years of "Cold Fusion" Excess Heat and Nuclear Evidence Exciting news that has circulated for about a month in the low-energy nuclear reactions field (LENR, a.k.a. "cold fusion") has now been confirmed. The DoE has agreed to perform a review of the entire "cold fusion" (LENR) question. The U.S. Department of Energy has made a startling reversal of its past refusal to evaluate with a fresh look the large body of experimental evidence that now supports highly anomalous non-chemical magnitude excess heat phenomena in some hydrogen systems, plus associated nuclear anomalies. The details of how the review will be conducted and when it is to begin have not yet been released formally, but it is expected to be completed by the end of 2004. News of this major DoE reversal comes at a time of growing concern about present and future energy resources, as well as debate over funding for controlled thermonuclear fusion research, that is, "hot" fusion. It also comes at a time when much discussion of the "hydrogen economy" and fuel cells fills the media. LENR research suggests, by contrast, that orders-of-magnitude more powerful energy reserves are associated with hydrogen than conventionally understood chemical energy models would allow. This ought to please open-minded environmentalists and others concerned about the future of the energy-environment problem and potential impacts on global climate. Just as after the the original announcements by chemists Drs. Martin Fleischmann and B. Stanley Pons at the University of Utah on March 23, 1989 and by physicist Steven E. Jones at Brigham Young University subsequently, this disclosure by the U.S. DoE is certain to prompt intense controversy and expectation. The great difference this time, however, is that a much larger body of excellent published experimental work now exists from researchers around the globe, which the DoE should be compelled to examine in its review. By right, this review should have happened a decade ago ‹ but better late than never. In our view, the body of supporting evidence for large magnitude excess heat and nuclear products in "cold fusion" is so solid at this time that it would essentially be intellectually impossible for an objective DoE panel to come to other than a very positive conclusion about the evidence and the prospect of technological applications. Of course, it is quite possible that bureaucratic, unethical machinations will again occur that will preclude such a reasonable outcome. We hope that does not happen. Another difference between now and 1989: there are now operational experimental electrolytic and other excess energy cells in various laboratories in the US and abroad; these are producing repeatable, verifiable excess energy that cannot possibly be explained by ordinary chemical reactions. In some cases, for example, one watt of electrical input power goes into a closed cell and an output power of 3 to 4 watts of heat occurs for a prolonged time. Much more powerful cells have also been operated. There is evidence of helium-4 and helium-3 production, tritium production, low-level neutron emissions, charged particles, light emission spectral anomalies, the formation of unusual chemical compounds, and even the transmutation of heavy elements in what seems to be a mix of fusion- and fission-like reactions. Laser radiation, ultrasonic activation, and magnetic fields, among a variety of other stimuli, have been found to enhance LENR reactions. It appears that an entirely new realm of physics and chemistry is suggested by the expanding body of experimental evidence. There are almost certainly implications for biology and medicine too. Many of the scientific papers from the LENR field and other historical materials can now be freely downloaded from the websites: www.lenr-canr.org and from www.infinite-energy.com. The confirmation of the DoE review came first in a draft article by Physics Today science journalist Toni Feder. This draft was circulated to several LENR scientists, critics, and others who gave input to Ms. Feder. New Energy Foundation provided input to Ms. Feder and welcomed receipt of the draft article from her. The article is to appear in Physics Today's April 2004 issue, which should be out by the first week of April. Physics Today is published by the American Physical Society, an organization which by-and-large has not been open to the study of LENR phenomena, though it has allowed small sessions on the subject to be organized at its national meetings. In fact, the late LENR theorist, Nobel laureate Julian Schwinger, resigned from the APS in the early 1990s because the APS journals refused to publish his theories about the possible mechanisms of cold fusion. The first popular journal to publish the news of the impending DoE review is, however, the UK-based New Scientist. In its March 20, 2004 issue, which was received in the mail today (3/20) at New Energy Foundation here in Concord, New Hampshire, freelance journalist Ben Daviss reports in a short article in the "Upfront: News in perspective" section (p.6), that James Decker, deputy director of the DoE's Office of Science, "has pledged to review evidence from the past 15 years of research in the controversial field." Daviss also writes, "The study could be completed by January 2005 and might open up the possibility of funding for cold fusion research projects." There is additional high-level scientific support for the DoE review: Former DoE Office of Science Director, Dr. Mildred Dresselhaus (an MIT Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science) is quoted in the Physics Today article: "I think scientists should be open-minded. Historically, many things get overturned with time." Prof. Dresselhaus was on the original ERAB (Energy Research Advisory Board) Cold Fusion Panel in 1989, which rendered a highly negative and very premature report on November 1, 1989. Though over the years she has not been one of the highly antagonistic critics of LENR with which that panel was packed, she did not assist approaches to the DoE for LENR reconsideration, during her brief position at DoE in the Clinton Administration years. This is a welcome turn-around for MIT Prof. Dresselhaus, for which we commend her. The initiative that helped launch the impending review was a letter to U.S. Energy Secretary Spencer Abraham from MIT Professor Peter Hagelstein, a cold fusion theorist since 1989. Prof. Hagelstein chaired ICCF10, The Tenth International Conference on Cold Fusion, which was held in Cambridge, MA and in part at MIT, August 24-29, 2003. Solid demonstrations of excess power in electrolytic cells were exhibited on the MIT campus by two scientific groups. It was shortly after ICCF10 that Prof. Hagelstein wrote to Spencer Abraham. New Energy Foundation's journal, Infinite Energy Magazine, decided to published Hagelstein's letter in its November/December 2003 issue (Vol.9, No.52, p.46). Prof. Hagelstein told the U.S. Secretary of Energy that Wall Street Journal reporter Sharon Begley, who had attended ICCF10 for a few days, concluded in her "Science Journal" column of September 5, 2005, "that perhaps most problematic about the conference was not what was presented and discussed at the conference, but the lack of interest on the part of the scientific community." The Begley column was titled: "Cold Fusion Isn't Dead, It's Just Withering from Scientific Neglect." The door to DoE was evidently further opened by Randall Hekman, who is an MIT graduate (1969), a former judge, and an energy entrepreneur (Hekman Industries). Hekman knows Spencer Abraham and Republican Congressman Vern Ehlers from Michigan, who is a physicist. Ehlers is quoted in the Physics Today article that it is time for a new review "because there is enough work going on and some of the scientists in the area are from respected institutions." One potential minefield for an honest review of the LENR evidence, apart from the bias and well known hostility of the pathological skeptics, is the raising of the straw man of the alleged "requirement" for comprehensive microphysical explanation of LENR phenomena before the experimental data can be accepted. That is a well-known anti-scientific tactic that the pathological skeptics have employed for years. There have been many proposed theories to explain the evidence ‹ both the excess heat and the nuclear products - but no single theory appears yet to encompass ALL the evidence. That is not an unusual condition on the frontiers of physics and science in general, which the critics pretend to forget. So, our strongest advice for a fundamental ground rule for the DoE review is that the review should focus primarily on determining this key finding: the validity of the evidence for non-chemical magnitude excess heat and nuclear anomalies ‹ as well as any other physical anomalies associated with the systems, such as anomalies in light emission. Involved judgments about how the verified phenomena operate should be reserved for the future. In May 1991, this author (Eugene Mallove) wrote in Fire from Ice: Searching for the Truth Behind the Cold Fusion Furor (John Wiley & Sons): ³After reviewing mounting evidence from cold fusion experiments, I am persuaded that it provides a compelling indication that a new kind of nuclear process is at work. I would say that the evidence is *overwhelmingly compelling* that cold fusion is a real, new nuclear process capable of significant excess power generation...There is yet no proved nuclear explanation for the excess heat. That excess heat exists is amply proved.² (From the Preface, p. xv) This conclusion of 1991, in the first book in the world which presented a positive evaluation of the discovery, was based on already very, very solid evidence. Now the DoE review panel has much more evidence to back up that same conclusion. It remains valid in 2004 as it was in 1991. Another excellent book, which reviews the entire cold fusion saga, is by MIT-trained engineer Charles Beaudette (MIT '52), Excess Heat: Why Cold Fusion Research Prevailed (2002 edition, available at www.infinite-energy.com) Furthermore, it is the view of this author (perhaps not shared by many in the LENR field) that the DoE review as part of its task should examine other significant New Energy-related research that has been published, beyond what is ordinarily confined within the LENR field (www.lenr-canr.org). This research is almost certain to shed significant light on what has been found within LENR proper. In particular, there are three primary websites where such closely-related technical information and can be obtained: www.infinite-energy.com (New Energy Foundation, Inc.) www.blacklightpower.com (BlackLight Power Corporation) www.aetherometry.com (Labofex and Aurora Biophysics Research Inst.) As an additional assist to the prospective DoE review, a Memorandum to the White House from this author (requested by President Clinton's staff in February 2000, following the urging of our supporter Sir Arthur C. Clarke) has been posted at www.infinite-energy.com. Review panelists and concerned citizens should examine this document. It provides a concise historical and technical overview of the scientific problem of energy from water, titled "The Strange Birth of the Water Fuel Age." Unfortunately, neither the Clinton Administration nor the present Bush Administration acted on the suggestions of this Memorandum, until the present impending review, which was separately prompted by Professor Hagelstein's letter. We sincerely praise U.S. Secretary of Energy Spenser Abraham for facilitating this landmark decision to launch a review. Concerned citizens (and especially MIT graduates) should also examine the 55-page report about the events at MIT in the early days of the cold fusion controversy ‹ a free downloadable pdf-file at www.infinite-energy.com As a final note: Though we very much appreciate that DoE will be carrying out a review of the LENR evidence, we do not need DoE's imprint and approval to realize that we are dealing with a critical frontier of scientific and technological research that has been validated long ago. Funding for New Energy research is needed NOW, not in 9 or 10 months! The DoE review is in some sense at best a corrective to a severe "political problem" that has occurred within the house of official science and in mainstream scientific publication. Therefore, we urge readers of this message to consider charitable contributions to the New Energy Foundation (a nonprofit 501(c)(3) corporation). These contributions already have made possible scientific research grants to New Energy investigators ‹ especially within LENR, as well as on-going scientific publication efforts: books, magazines, video tapes, DVD's, etc. For example, New Energy Foundation helped fund the ICCF10 conference in Cambridge, MA last August, which helped lead to the DoE review breakthrough. ICCF11, which will be in Marseilles, France October 31-November 5, 2004 (www.iccf11.org) is also in need of financial support from New Energy Foundation. Sincerely, Dr. Eugene F. Mallove (MIT SB'69, SM'70; Harvard Sc.D. 1975) President, New Energy Foundation, Inc. (A Non-profit, 501(c)(3) Corporation) Editor-in-Chief, Infinite Energy Magazine PO Box 2816 Concord, NH 03302-2816 www.infinite-energy.com editor infinite-energy.com 603-485-4700 Fx: 603-485-4710 From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 21 09:38:46 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2LHbKgX016106; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 09:38:41 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2LHbGId016087; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 09:37:16 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 09:37:16 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 10:36:04 -0700 Message-Id: <200403211036.AA886964544 mail1.myexcel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: "dskjdk" Reply-To: X-Sender: To: Subject: Re: U.S. DoE Will Review 15-Years of "Cold Fusion" Excess Heat andNuclear Evidence X-Mailer: Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53628 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: (1) The door to DoE was evidently further opened by Randall Hekman, who is an MIT graduate (1969), a former judge, and an energy entrepreneur (Hekman Industries). Good for Randy! I haven't looked him up in ages. He's a genuinely good man--as solid a person as anyone could hope to find. (2)Republican Congressman Vern Ehlers from Michigan, who is a physicist. Ehlers is quoted in the Physics Today article that it is time for a new review "because there is enough work going on and some of the scientists in the area are from respected institutions." Wow!--big turnaround for him. Vernon is my Congressman and a former professor at my Alma Mater. He is also highly respectable (and boring as a stick), but this is one of the most honest, solid, and non-flakey Congressmen one will ever find. Environmentalists also like him because he's more supportive of their positions than the "typical" Republican is imagined to be. Guess I'd better go to a few of his campaign meetings this year. (I don't go otherwise because there's no reason to--he always wins with something like 70% or more of the vote--the Democrats haven't had a candidate-with-a-prayer-of-beating-him to face him since he first ran for national office. Jeffery D. Kooistra From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 21 09:59:25 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2LHvwKA025353; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 09:59:19 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2LHvZjv025292; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 09:57:35 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 09:57:35 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <20040321175608.3023.qmail web41510.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 09:56:08 -0800 (PST) From: Harvey Norris Subject: Re: Electrolysis Reseacher Stumbles into Ferrite Heating Anomaly. To: vortex-l eskimo.com Cc: teslafy yahoogroups.com In-Reply-To: <20040317034013.41147.qmail web41509.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53629 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: --- Harvey Norris wrote: > For 4 watts true alternator power delivery, I heat > ferrite red hot, by use of METR inputs; this is over > the unity barrier. For 12 watts a red speck can be > seen, but this is just near over the over unity > barrier. The ferrite looses resistance with heat, > and > the hotter you work, the more the overunity angle. > Here I am showing the first evidence of this > (reactive) over unity phase angle extraction with a > 4 > watt extraction, where the 12 watt extraction is 4 > times less efficient for energy releases. I was > trying > some ambient magnetisation techniqes of ferrite, and > found that the heat on one trial destroyed my NIB > magnetizing influence. Someone wrote requesting photos,which I forgot to submit; however the only means available at the present, save for sending the photos directly to a recieving party, is to submit them on the teslafy yahoo group I started. I am near the storage limit now also, so I was going to redo the pics, as they are unsatisfactory,(and then delete these former pics soon) and out of focus, as the pics were made too close to pieces. Unfortunately Yahoo has a policy of making photos only available to group members, so one would have to breifly sign on to see them. It does not take long to subscribe, and just follow list instructions for removal. Here are the URLs... 12 watt input/ferrite heating 1.8 A(deletion files) http://groups.yahoo.com/group/teslafy/files/Dsc00568.jpg 4 watt true input to 2.3 AMP ferrite glow http://groups.yahoo.com/group/teslafy/files/Dsc00566.jpg Now because the ferrite heating after DC rectification consists of power extraction internal to three phase alternator tank circuits, the actual "reactive" power in 480 hz alternator application is higher then the cited values. The cited "true" power input is the heating loss on the exterior METR spirals of .6 ohm, where that power input is calculated simply as I squared R, and technically probably represents the delivery intervening heating loss to the central ferrite load being heated. HDN ===== Tesla Research Group; Pioneering the Applications of Interphasal Resonances http://groups.yahoo.com/group/teslafy/ From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 21 14:59:36 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2LMw977017151; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 14:59:29 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2LMw7bA017138; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 14:58:07 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 14:58:07 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f From: Erikbaard aol.com Message-ID: <113.305742dc.2d8f77f5 aol.com> Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 17:57:57 EST Subject: better that he stumbles into ferrite heating than... To: vortex-l eskimo.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_113.305742dc.2d8f77f5_boundary" X-Mailer: 8.0 for Windows sub 6024 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53630 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: --part1_113.305742dc.2d8f77f5_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit ...into a ferret in heat! : ) Erik Baard --part1_113.305742dc.2d8f77f5_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable ...into a ferret in heat!

: )

Erik Baard
--part1_113.305742dc.2d8f77f5_boundary-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 21 15:49:17 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2LNlp6u029968; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 15:49:12 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2LNlg0T029927; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 15:47:42 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 15:47:42 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <405E29E6.9000904 rtpatlanta.com> Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 18:48:54 -0500 From: Terry Blanton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: better that he stumbles into ferrite heating than... References: <113.305742dc.2d8f77f5 aol.com> In-Reply-To: <113.305742dc.2d8f77f5 aol.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53631 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Erikbaard aol.com wrote: > ...into a ferret in heat! You're able to make a living writing, right? :) From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 21 19:20:22 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2M3It77028787; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 19:20:16 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2M3Ir3Y028774; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 19:18:53 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 19:18:53 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Reply-To: From: "Keith Nagel" To: Subject: RE: Asteroid flyby tonight Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 22:43:13 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 X-Rcpt-To: Resent-Message-ID: <-tTfmB.A.gBH.dslXAB ultra5.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53632 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Hi Horace. you write: >That may be so, but what happened shortly after the earth formed is not of >any significant concern. It is irrelevant. It is the record of the last >1/8 of the earth's lifetime that is of concern. >From the point of view of my argument, it matter much. I am suggesting that if you could look at the overall trend of impacts, you would see an expotential decay peaked at the time of the formation of the planet, and dropping thereafter. This would be overlayed by smaller scale phenomena, in addition to a constant level of bombardment. I think we may have reached the steady state, and I'm curious how the data you present was gathered? >In this perspective there are 3 events in each of the last 300 million year >periods. I don't see any evidence of events disappearing with time. On >the contrary, there appears to be a cyclic pattern to the event durations, >and, depending on how you look at it, it may be that we are somewhat >overdue for an event. Well, I'm a bit of a selfish bugger, so lets say we calculate the odds of an event in my lifetime ( say 100 years, although I'll be lucky to reach 60 I think ). I suspect this number will be pretty damn small, huh? But, in the last 100 years, we did have an event the size of Tunguska. So I might see something like this in my lifetime. You mention Jupiter and the remarkable series of impacts a few years back. This I see is one of the great features of our solar system, a sort of natural "star wars missile defence" which, unlike the one we're developing, actually seems to work. Huge masses, orbiting far away from the home planet, naturally drawing comets and asteroids into collision. Is it not possible that these planets are so large _because_ this works as I describe? I think the issue is a concern, but given the threats now confronting us, an unlikely one. I still feel that given the timeframes you discuss, the next asteroid hit on Earth will be artificially generated rather than natural. K. PS: Fun story about Shoemaker, it's comforting to me that our current defense consists of amateurs like Shoemaker. These people are far more motivated to find objects than anything money can buy. Some smart educator should start a "planetary defense corps" to get young people interested in astronomy. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 21 21:32:45 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2M5VK6u011627; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 21:32:41 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2M5VId9011608; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 21:31:18 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 21:31:18 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 20:36:06 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: U.S. DoE Will Review 15-Years of "Cold Fusion" Excess Heat and Nuclear Evidence Cc: Eugene Mallove Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53633 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 11:15 AM 3/21/4, Eugene F. Mallove wrote: [snip] >Furthermore, it is the view of this author (perhaps not shared by many in >the LENR field) that the DoE review as part of its task should examine other >significant New Energy-related research that has been published, beyond what >is ordinarily confined within the LENR field (www.lenr-canr.org). This >research is almost certain to shed significant light on what has been found >within LENR proper. In particular, there are three primary websites where >such closely-related technical information and can be obtained: > > www.infinite-energy.com (New Energy Foundation, Inc.) > > www.blacklightpower.com (BlackLight Power Corporation) > > www.aetherometry.com (Labofex and Aurora Biophysics Research Inst.) [snip] This kind of high level cold fusion review should be focused on data, not on theory. Data, data, data. Quality data. To the extent possible, replicated data. Data produced by people highly qualified to do the work, preferably having a PhD in a field most applicable to the work, be it physics or chemistry. Data preferably produced in National labs or in university environments. Data produced by people who do not stand to make fortunes on the outcome, the acceptance or refutation of the results. It even makes some sense to ignore excess heat results entirely and focus on nuclear anomalies, like production of helium, tritium, neutrons, or even heavy transmutations provided the data is of high quality. If the past experiences on sci.physics.fusion, and of late vortex-l eskimo.co, have taught us any lesson then that lesson should be how difficult it is to gain acceptance of calorimetry data. For that matter, these experiences have taught how difficult it is to do calorimetry without inadvertantly creating artifacts. At this point it is better to firmly establish one indisputable anomaly than it is to have a lot of highly controversial stuff reviewed only to have the inevitable ambivalent or negative outcome from the review. A horrific approach would be to have data reviewed from experiments designed by, and interpreted based upon, theories which are not only controversial and non-mainstream, but which have absolutely no possibility of mainstream acceptance without commercial working devices being available in the marketplace. To really sabotage things one should make sure in large part the theories and data to be reviewed have been produced by people without impeccable credentials yet who are working in part or in whole for the profit potential. It seems to me that some of the best work for review might even be a bit outside the original F&P fusion in a bottle, and might be work with no immediate commercial prospects. The work of people like Claytor on tritium generation on low energy thin wires, possibly the work by Taleyarkhan et al on sonofusion (though still perhaps too controversial), the work by Kamada et al bombarding deuterium loaded aluminum targets, and the slew of reports of heavy transmutations by Bockris et al and others. The objective at hand it seems to me is to establish solid scientific anomalies, justification for serious scientific work and publication, not capital formation or business development. However, that said, recent ICCF's have had what appears to be a number of somewhat replicated experiments showing positive reports, for example work relating to the effect of lasers on loaded cathodes, like that of Storms, Cravens, etc. Replicated work should have a high priority even if it does involve calorimetry. If no other objective is obtained from this study than legitimizing publication of work in the field, then this will be a significant step forward, a step toward eventual research funding. I hope the opportunity is not wasted by a strategic blunder. This is an effort that should be as mainstream as possible. The more fringe it is, the more useless the effort. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 21 23:11:05 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2M79db3007894; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 23:10:59 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2M79box007874; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 23:09:37 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 23:09:37 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 22:14:14 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: U.S. DoE Will Review 15-Years of "Cold Fusion" Excess Heat and Nuclear Evidence Resent-Message-ID: <7eAVZB.A.86B.wEpXAB ultra5.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53634 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 11:15 AM 3/21/4, Eugene F. Mallove wrote: [snip] >Furthermore, it is the view of this author (perhaps not shared by many in >the LENR field) that the DoE review as part of its task should examine other >significant New Energy-related research that has been published, beyond what >is ordinarily confined within the LENR field (www.lenr-canr.org). This >research is almost certain to shed significant light on what has been found >within LENR proper. In particular, there are three primary websites where >such closely-related technical information and can be obtained: > > www.infinite-energy.com (New Energy Foundation, Inc.) > > www.blacklightpower.com (BlackLight Power Corporation) > > www.aetherometry.com (Labofex and Aurora Biophysics Research Inst.) [snip] This kind of high level cold fusion review should be focused on data, not on theory. Data, data, data. Quality data. To the extent possible, replicated data. Data produced by people highly qualified to do the work, preferably having a PhD in a field most applicable to the work, be it physics or chemistry. Data preferably produced in National labs or in university environments. Data produced by people who do not stand to make fortunes on the outcome, the acceptance or refutation of the results. It even makes some sense to ignore excess heat results entirely and focus on nuclear anomalies, like production of helium, tritium, neutrons, or even heavy transmutations provided the data is of high quality. If the past experiences on sci.physics.fusion, and of late vortex-l eskimo.co, have taught us any lesson then that lesson should be how difficult it is to gain acceptance of calorimetry data. For that matter, these experiences have taught how difficult it is to do calorimetry without inadvertantly creating artifacts. At this point it is better to firmly establish one indisputable anomaly than it is to have a lot of highly controversial stuff reviewed only to have the inevitable ambivalent or negative outcome from the review. A horrific approach would be to have data reviewed from experiments designed by, and interpreted based upon, theories which are not only controversial and non-mainstream, but which have absolutely no possibility of mainstream acceptance without commercial working devices being available in the marketplace. To really sabotage things one should make sure in large part the theories and data to be reviewed have been produced by people without impeccable credentials yet who are working in part or in whole for the profit potential. It seems to me that some of the best work for review might even be a bit outside the original F&P fusion in a bottle, and might be work with no immediate commercial prospects. The work of people like Claytor on tritium generation on low energy thin wires, possibly the work by Taleyarkhan et al on sonofusion (though still perhaps too controversial), the work by Kamada et al bombarding deuterium loaded aluminum targets, and the slew of reports of heavy transmutations by Bockris et al and others. The objective at hand it seems to me is to establish solid scientific anomalies, justification for serious scientific work and publication, not capital formation or business development. However, that said, recent ICCF's have had what appears to be a number of somewhat replicated experiments showing positive reports, for example work relating to the effect of lasers on loaded cathodes, like that of Storms, Cravens, etc. Replicated work should have a high priority even if it does involve calorimetry. If no other objective is obtained from this study than legitimizing publication of work in the field, then this will be a significant step forward, a step toward eventual research funding. I hope the opportunity is not wasted by a strategic blunder. This is an effort that should be as mainstream as possible. The more fringe it is, the more useless the effort. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 22 08:25:39 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2MGPP0L023910; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 08:25:30 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2MGPEuE023837; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 08:25:14 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 08:25:14 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: <15a.30280451.2d8920a0 aol.com> Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 10:26:00 -0600 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: thomas malloy Subject: Save Hubble Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-DCC-CPI-Metrics: Clear 1161; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53635 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: There is a bill before congress which would reverse the decision of the NASA Administrator to abandon the Hubble, HR 550. If you agree that it is one of the best investments that the government has made in terms of science produced, you should contact your representative. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 22 08:25:47 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2MGPO0L023903; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 08:25:24 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2MGPNMe023886; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 08:25:23 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 08:25:23 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 10:26:00 -0600 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: thomas malloy Subject: Re: Asteroid flyby tonight Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-DCC-CPI-Metrics: Clear 1161; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53636 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Horace Heffner replied >course if you assume just a bit more velocity than escape velocity you get >right back up to about 1 megaton TNT. It's in that ballpark for sure. If >you happen to be in the impact area I doubt the difference will be >significant! 8^) Doesn't it depend on the angle of incidence? From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 22 08:58:10 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2MGvv0L001663; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 08:57:57 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2MGvsbu001573; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 08:57:54 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 08:57:54 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.2.20040322085537.00ab3bf0 mail.dlsi.net> X-Sender: stevek mail.dlsi.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9 Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 09:01:04 -0800 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Steve Krivit Subject: Re: U.S. DoE Will Review 15-Years of "Cold Fusion" Excess Heat and Nuclear Evidence In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <48epbD.A.hY.RsxXAB ultra5.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53637 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Horace: You may like to know that the DOE people in charge of the review have received a copy of the following: http://www.newenergytimes.com/reports/Review20ColdFusionPapers.htm Steve From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 22 09:34:58 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2MHYrPu021325; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 09:34:53 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2MHYpjw021305; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 09:34:51 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 09:34:51 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 08:41:02 -0900 To: From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: RE: Asteroid flyby tonight Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53638 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 10:43 PM 3/21/4, Keith Nagel wrote: >Hi Horace. > >you write: >>That may be so, but what happened shortly after the earth formed is not of >>any significant concern. It is irrelevant. It is the record of the last >>1/8 of the earth's lifetime that is of concern. > >>From the point of view of my argument, it matter much. I am suggesting >that if you could look at the overall trend of impacts, you would >see an expotential decay peaked at the time of the formation of >the planet, and dropping thereafter. I don't think this is necessarily true. In fact, if the Nemesis theory is correct the exponential decay of collision events probably died out for the most part long ago, prior to 3.6 billion years. The pre-cambrian period lasted from about 3.5 biliion years ago to the cambrian period about 570 million years ago. It might be that a Nemesis cloud creating event occured about 570 million years ago. That may be a useful working hypothesis. In that case the collision rate would have jumped a large amount at that time bu remained roughly constant. The thing that appears to be true, that is worrisome, is that we have a farily constant large event hit rate in recent times, i.e the last 600 million years or so. >This would be overlayed by >smaller scale phenomena, in addition to a constant level >of bombardment. Yes. >I think we may have reached the steady state, If we agree on that then I feel we agree on the important point. >and I'm >curious how the data you present was gathered? Well, I did include a reference to: There is lots of information in subordinate URL's, especially off: A Google search of "mass extinction" or "global mass extinction", etc. will turn up a lot more stuff. Basically the data is obtained by careful catalogging of fossil species in various geologic layers of the earth's crust. These layers are similar all over the earth with respect to layer thickness, associated fossil species, mineral content, and age as determined by isotopic analysis. Sudden changes in the groups of species present demark geologic ages and mass extinctions. In one layer many species exist that do not exist in the next layer. Sometimes these major extictions are associted with a thin layer of unusual metal deposits. These metals are only found in large proportions in meteorites, e.g. iridium. This is how the metorite extinction hypothesis was orighinated. There are quibbles about the preciseness of the dating of the geologic ages, but as far as I know not of the ages themselves, nor of the rough approximate dates of the age transistions. As the above web page states, there is general agreement on at least 6 global mass extinctions as well, some of which have been strongly associated with specific impact sites. I think it is interresting that things get buried at all, geologically speaking. Geologic layers are not just formed undersea, so are not just due to sedimentation caused by the presence of water. Something is making deposits on the surface of both water and land. I don't think it is just volcanos. Things get buried that are not near volcanos. What can that be? I think the answer must be the steady stream of dust coming from the sky - dust due to meteorites. If that is true, then a reasonable speculation is tha it might be possible to find a significant dust fall, a fairly thick but quickly formed geologic layer, associated with Nemesis returns. I don't know if there is any evidence of this or not. > >>In this perspective there are 3 events in each of the last 300 million year >>periods. I don't see any evidence of events disappearing with time. On >>the contrary, there appears to be a cyclic pattern to the event durations, >>and, depending on how you look at it, it may be that we are somewhat >>overdue for an event. > >Well, I'm a bit of a selfish bugger, so lets say we calculate the >odds of an event in my lifetime ( say 100 years, although I'll be >lucky to reach 60 I think ). I suspect this number will be pretty >damn small, huh? For major extiction impacts, yes indeed. Even if the most frequent number suggested is used, i.e every 25 million years on average, you get a probability of 1/((2.5x10^7)/(10^2)) = 4x10^-6, or about 4 chances in a million, one in 250,000. This in fact provides a fairly good argument for a coming Nemesis cloud, a coming earth impact event. That argument is that an impact with Jupiter is similarly unlikely. Jupiter's radius is about 10 times that of earth, so its cross section is about 100 times that of earth. Actually, considering its gravitational field, due to Jupiter being a lot less dense than earth, its true collision cross section may be a lot less than 100 times that of earth. At any rate, we would expect a major event on Jupiter about once in every 2500 lifetimes. Isn't it very strange that we witnessed one in our lifetimes? >>But, in the last 100 years, we did have an >event the size of Tunguska. So I might see something like this >in my lifetime. Tunguska happened to be in an area where the record of the event was maintained. In many other areas of the world, especially at sea, or in arctic areas, there would be no such record. The probability of a Tunguska sized even, 10 megatons, might thus be much more proable than once in a lifetime. Also, if a 10 megaton event if once in a lifetime, a 1 megaton event or larger should be more often. If anything it is surprising we have not had more of them. I suppose that could be an agrument that tunguska was an unusal event, one that happens a lot less often than once in a 100 years. On the other hand, if the probability of an event changes with time, an event of that size within the last 100 years migth be a precourser of some kind. It might also be that small objects are less common than originally in the solar system because they tend to come together to form comets, etc. > >You mention Jupiter and the remarkable series of impacts a few >years back. This I see is one of the great features of our >solar system, a sort of natural "star wars missile defence" which, >unlike the one we're developing, actually seems to work. Huge masses, >orbiting far away from the home planet, naturally drawing comets and >asteroids >into collision. Is it not possible that these planets are so large >_because_ this works as I describe? I don't think so. Not in the last 100 million years anyway, which is just a brief time for the solar system. Also, if you consider the sum of the cross section of Jupiter, Saturn, etc., compared to the angular area of our sphere, the probability of this "missile defense system" actually working are about nill. > >I think the issue is a concern, but given the threats now confronting >us, an unlikely one. I still feel that given the timeframes you >discuss, the next asteroid hit on Earth will be artificially generated >rather than natural. Could be, but we would still need the warning system in that event. > >K. > >PS: Fun story about Shoemaker, it's comforting to me that our current >defense consists of amateurs like Shoemaker. These people are far >more motivated to find objects than anything money can buy. Some smart >educator should start a "planetary defense corps" to get young people >interested in astronomy. I think there is something already formed or forming along those lines. A number of CF folks (e.g Tom Drouge?) have been involved in that. Not so much aligned on the youth aspect as along the amateur aspect though. Such an effort would of course be enhanced a great deal through internet coordination or even direct networking of telescopes. The imbedded operating system technology required is only just becoming very affordable and accessable for amateurs, so I expect some significant developments along those lines. I understand Scott Little bought himself a pretty nice scope in recent years, but I don't know if he is involved in impact object searching. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 22 10:20:25 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2MIKIPu001901; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 10:20:18 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2MIKHtB001888; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 10:20:17 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 10:20:17 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 09:26:30 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: U.S. DoE Will Review 15-Years of "Cold Fusion" Excess Heat and Nuclear Evidence Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53639 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 9:01 AM 3/22/4, Steve Krivit wrote: >Horace: > >You may like to know that the DOE people in charge of the review have >received a copy of the following: > >http://www.newenergytimes.com/reports/Review20ColdFusionPapers.htm > > >Steve An interesting cross-section. Thanks for posting. One thing seems really apparent at this point. There has not been sufficient replication work in the field, independent work at differing locations by differing teams. Not enough true replication, without either "ego modifications" or the corner cutting necessitated by highly limited budgets. If there is an area where significant government support is justified, then that must be it. A troublesome problem if funding were to be made available for replications is who gets the support? What experiments are to be replicated? Hopefully someone who has taken a strongly adversarial position, like Parks or Huezenga, would not be in charge of such choices! Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 22 11:04:37 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2MJ4Q3K008493; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 11:04:27 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2MJ4O6M008463; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 11:04:24 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 11:04:24 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.2.20040322103331.00ab9948 mail.dlsi.net> X-Sender: stevek mail.dlsi.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9 Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 11:07:44 -0800 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Steve Krivit Subject: Re: U.S. DoE Will Review 15-Years of "Cold Fusion" Excess Heat and Nuclear Evidence In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=====================_1008010250==.ALT" Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53640 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: --=====================_1008010250==.ALT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Horace: >An interesting cross-section. Thanks for posting. You are welcome. >One thing seems really apparent at this point. There has not been >sufficient replication work in the field, >independent work at differing >locations by differing teams. Not enough true replication, without either >"ego modifications" or the corner cutting necessitated by highly limited >budgets. If there is an area where significant government support is >justified, then that must be it. I strongly agree. >A troublesome problem if funding were to be made available for replications >is who gets the support? What experiments are to be replicated? Money, politics and fame...will become topics of interest. >Hopefully someone who has taken a strongly adversarial position, like Parks or >Huezenga, would not be in charge of such choices! I think their time has come. From page 21 of my paper "The Cold Fusion Report", available later this week: Eight months after the initial announcement, a panel of individuals from industry and academia who served on the U.S. Department of Energy's Energy Resources Advisory Board dealt cold fusion a critical blow when the panel decided that Fleischmann and Pons' claims did not warrant special federal funding. The cold fusion panel was selected and directed by John Huizenga, professor emeritus of chemistry and physics at My guess is that the University of Rochester, New York. In Huizenga's 1993 book Cold Fusion: The Scientific Fiasco of the Century, he wrote, "My initial feeling was that the whole cold fusion episode would be short-lived and that it would be wise to delay appointing such a panel." Steve --=====================_1008010250==.ALT Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Horace:


An interesting cross-section.  Thanks for posting.

You are welcome.


One thing seems really apparent at this point.  There has not been
sufficient replication work in the field,
independent work at differing
locations by differing teams.  Not enough true replication, without either
"ego modifications" or the corner cutting necessitated by highly limited
budgets.  If there is an area where significant government support is
justified, then that must be it.

I strongly agree.



A troublesome problem if funding were to be made available for replications
is who gets the support?  What experiments are to be replicated? 

Money, politics and fame...will become topics of interest.


Hopefully someone who has taken a strongly adversarial position, like Parks or
Huezenga, would not be in charge of such choices!

I think their time has come.
From page 21 of my paper "The Cold Fusion Report", available later this week:


Eight months after the initial announcement, a panel of individuals from industry and academia who served on the U.S. Department of Energy's Energy Resources Advisory Board dealt cold fusion a critical blow when the panel decided that Fleischmann and Pons' claims did not warrant special federal funding. The cold fusion panel was selected and directed by John Huizenga, professor emeritus of chemistry and physics at
My guess is that the University of Rochester, New York. In Huizenga's 1993 book Cold Fusion: The Scientific Fiasco of the Century, he wrote, "My initial feeling was that the whole cold fusion episode would be short-lived and that it would be wise to delay appointing
such a panel."



Steve --=====================_1008010250==.ALT-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 22 11:04:51 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2MJ4haT015027; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 11:04:44 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2MJ4fGj015009; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 11:04:41 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 11:04:41 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.2.20040322110754.00ab1e70 mail.dlsi.net> X-Sender: stevek mail.dlsi.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9 Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 11:08:25 -0800 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Steve Krivit Subject: NEW REPORT ESTABLISHES CASE FOR COLD FUSION Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=====================_1008051359==.ALT" Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53641 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: A --=====================_1008051359==.ALT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE MARCH 22, 2004 CONTACT: Steven Krivit (310) 470-8189 (Office) NEW REPORT ESTABLISHES CASE FOR COLD FUSION U. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY TO TAKE A SECOND LOOK AT CONTROVERSIAL SUBJECT LOS ANGELES, March 22, 2004 -- Coinciding with the U.S. Department of Energy's decision to re-open the case on cold fusion, investigators Steven Krivit and Nadine Winocur have released the most current work on the history and progress of the science. "The Cold Fusion Report" is based on personal communication with more than 50 scientists from around the world, 28 of whom Krivit interviewed on camera at the 10th International Conference on Cold Fusion in Cambridge, Mass. As documented in the report, prominent U.S. scientists verify the efficacy of this controversial discovery. The report follows confirmation by U.S. Department of Energy media contact Jacqueline Johnson, as detailed in the "Upfront" section of the latest issue of New Scientist, that the department has committed to a second review of cold fusion. Another story, tentatively titled "DOE Warms to Cold Fusion," will be published in the April 1 Web edition of Physics Today, at www.physicstoday.org . The U.S. Department of Energy discussed a re-evaluation of cold fusion on Nov. 6, 2003, when representatives from the Office of Science met with a team of established scientists who have studied cold fusion for 15 years. The scientists reported that cold fusion is real, with results that are robust, verifiable and repeatable. This review is expected to evaluate the credibility of current claims and, assuming they are verified, decide whether government funding should be directed to cold fusion research. Although recent experimental results are promising, their commercial viability remains unknown. Scientists hope that new research will provide an answer to whether cold fusion may become a future energy source. The 53-page report includes quotes from such scientists as Dr. Melvin Miles, former senior electrochemist of the Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division at China Lake, Calif., who, commenting on an eight-year series of U.S. Navy cold fusion experiments, concluded, "In our opinion, these [findings] provide compelling evidence that the [cold fusion effects] are real. This research area has the potential to provide the human race with a nearly unlimited new source of energy. It is possible that [cold fusion] will prove to be one of the most important scientific discoveries of this century." It also cites a senior member of the technical staff at the U.S. government's Sandia National Laboratories, James Corey, who expressed at the September 2003 Energetic Materials Intelligence Symposium that "an overdue revolution in science will arrive, [and] the reputations of cold fusion scientists and those who revile them may be reversed." Although 3,000 scientific papers have been written about cold fusion, progress is underreported in the scientific and popular media because of a rift between cold fusion researchers and the scientific establishment, which has refused in its journals to publish articles relating to cold fusion. In a September 2003 article, science columnist Sharon Begley of the Wall Street Journal noted of this phenomenon, "the only thing pathological about cold fusion is the way the scientific establishment has treated it." "The Cold Fusion Report" includes the following findings: o More than 150 scientists worldwide, including 60 physicists, hold that cold fusion is a verifiable, reproducible low-temperature nuclear reaction, free of harmful radiation and nuclear waste. o Evidence that the effect is reproducible and has been demonstrated in many laboratories around the world, through a variety of methods. o Citations from five scientific papers which report correlation between excess energy and the nuclear by-product helium-4, a key finding which verifies the claims of low- temperature nuclear reactions. Historically, critics of cold fusion erroneously assumed that "cold fusion" should emit the same nuclear products as "hot fusion." Later research demonstrated that the hunt for the "missing neutrons" was misdirected and that the dominant product of cold fusion, instead, is helium-4. "The Cold Fusion Report" also includes evidence of the veracity of cold fusion in several previously unreleased documents: o A 1993 report to the Pentagon by former JASONS chairman Richard Garwin and by chemistry professor Nathan Lewis of Caltech that supports the findings of "excess heat," providing key evidence for the cold fusion effect. Four years earlier, Lewis tried unsuccessfully to replicate the cold fusion effect and subsequently became one of the most outspoken critics of cold fusion. o A 1991 report by chemistry professor Alan Bard of the University of Texas, a vocal critic of cold fusion who confirmed the presence of "excess heat" in an independent laboratory experiment at SRI International. o Two 1995 papers by scientists from Amoco Production Co. and Shell Research reporting positive, unambiguous evidence from their own cold fusion experiments. Part 1 of "The Cold Fusion Report" examines factors that led the scientific community to a premature rejection of the validity of cold fusion and explains why developments in cold fusion have gone virtually unreported. It reviews studies revealing that the early experiments conducted by prominent laboratories that were presumed to have debunked cold fusion were in fact seriously flawed. Part 2 of the report discusses the current status of cold fusion research. It reviews advances over the past 15 years and identifies the major unanswered questions. The report concludes with a glimpse of possible future applications for cold fusion technology. "The Cold Fusion Report" was reviewed for technical accuracy by two physicists with decades of experience in conventional fusion, one of whom has studied cold fusion, as well. The other, a skeptical plasma physicist who works for a major U.S. fusion research center, described the report as "correct, readable, even and unbiased, suitable for reaching physicists and educated people." Steven Krivit Nadine Winocur (310) 470-8189 (Office) steven@newenergytimes.com http://www.newenergytimes.com --=====================_1008051359==.ALT Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
MARCH 22, 2004

CONTACT: Steven Krivit
(310) 470-8189 (Office)



NEW REPORT ESTABLISHES CASE FOR COLD FUSION

U. S.  DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY TO TAKE  A 

SECOND LOOK AT CONTROVERSIAL SUBJECT


LOS ANGELES, March 22, 2004 -- Coinciding with the U.S. Department of Energy's decision to re-open the case on cold fusion, investigators Steven Krivit and Nadine Winocur have released the most current work on the history and progress of the science.

"The Cold Fusion Report" is based on personal communication with more than 50 scientists from around the world, 28 of whom Krivit interviewed on camera at the 10th International Conference on Cold Fusion in Cambridge, Mass. As documented in the report, prominent U.S. scientists verify the efficacy of this controversial discovery. 

The report follows confirmation by U.S. Department of Energy media contact Jacqueline Johnson, as detailed in the "Upfront" section of the latest issue of New Scientist, that the department has committed to a second review of cold fusion. Another story, tentatively titled "DOE Warms to Cold Fusion," will be published in the April 1 Web edition of Physics Today, at www.physicstoday.org .

The U.S. Department of Energy discussed a re-evaluation of cold fusion on Nov. 6, 2003, when representatives from the Office of Science met with a team of established scientists who have studied cold fusion for 15 years. The scientists reported that cold fusion is real, with results that are robust, verifiable and repeatable.

This review is expected to evaluate the credibility of current claims and, assuming they are verified, decide whether government funding should be directed to cold fusion research.

Although recent experimental results are promising, their commercial viability remains unknown. Scientists hope that new research will provide an answer to whether cold fusion may become a future energy source.

The 53-page report includes quotes from such scientists as Dr. Melvin Miles, former senior electrochemist of the Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division at China Lake, Calif., who, commenting on an eight-year series of U.S. Navy cold fusion experiments, concluded, "In our opinion, these [findings] provide compelling evidence that the [cold fusion effects] are real. This research area has the potential to provide the human race with a nearly unlimited new source of energy. It is possible that [cold fusion] will prove to be one of the most important scientific discoveries of this century."

It also cites a senior member of the technical staff at the U.S. government's Sandia National Laboratories, James Corey, who expressed at the September 2003 Energetic Materials Intelligence Symposium that "an overdue revolution in science will arrive, [and] the reputations of cold fusion scientists and those who revile them may be reversed."

Although 3,000 scientific papers have been written about cold fusion, progress is underreported in the scientific and popular media because of a rift between cold fusion researchers and the scientific establishment, which has refused in its journals to publish articles relating to cold fusion.

In a September 2003 article, science columnist Sharon Begley of the Wall Street Journal noted of this phenomenon, "the only thing pathological about cold fusion is the way the scientific establishment has treated it."

"The Cold Fusion Report" includes the following findings:

        o       More than 150 scientists worldwide, including 60 physicists, hold that cold fusion
                is a verifiable, reproducible low-temperature nuclear reaction, free of harmful radiation
                and nuclear waste.

        o       Evidence that the effect is reproducible and has been demonstrated
                in many laboratories around the world, through a variety of methods.

             Citations from five scientific papers which report correlation between excess energy
                and the nuclear by-product helium-4, a key finding which verifies the claims of low-
                temperature nuclear reactions. Historically, critics of cold fusion erroneously
                assumed that "cold fusion" should emit the same nuclear products as "hot fusion."
                Later research demonstrated that the hunt for the "missing neutrons" was
                misdirected and that the dominant product of cold fusion, instead, is helium-4.

"The Cold Fusion Report" also includes evidence of the veracity of cold fusion in several previously unreleased documents:

        o       A 1993 report to the Pentagon by former JASONS chairman Richard Garwin and by
                chemistry professor Nathan Lewis of Caltech that supports the findings of "excess
                heat," providing key evidence for the cold fusion effect. Four years earlier, Lewis
                tried unsuccessfully to replicate the cold fusion effect and subsequently became one
                of the most outspoken critics of cold fusion.

        o       A 1991 report by chemistry professor Alan Bard of the University of Texas,
                a vocal critic of cold fusion who confirmed the presence of "excess heat"
                in an independent laboratory experiment at SRI International.

        o       Two 1995 papers by scientists from Amoco Production Co. and Shell Research
                reporting positive, unambiguous evidence from their own cold fusion experiments.

Part 1 of "The Cold Fusion Report" examines factors that led the scientific community to a premature rejection of the validity of cold fusion and explains why developments in cold fusion have gone virtually unreported. It reviews studies revealing that the early experiments conducted by prominent laboratories that were presumed to have debunked cold fusion were in fact seriously flawed.

Part 2 of the report discusses the current status of cold fusion research. It reviews advances over the past 15 years and identifies the major unanswered questions. The report concludes with a glimpse of possible future applications for cold fusion technology.

"The Cold Fusion Report" was reviewed for technical accuracy by two physicists with decades of experience in conventional fusion, one of whom has studied cold fusion, as well. The other, a skeptical plasma physicist who works for a major U.S. fusion research center, described the report as "correct, readable, even and unbiased, suitable for reaching physicists and educated people." 


Steven Krivit
Nadine Winocur
(310) 470-8189 (Office)
steven@newenergytimes.com
http://www.newenergytimes.com


--=====================_1008051359==.ALT-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 22 11:36:02 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2MJZtaT024441; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 11:35:56 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2MJZriF024420; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 11:35:53 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 11:35:53 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <405F40FD.D8DC0284 ix.netcom.com> Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 11:39:41 -0800 From: Edmund Storms Organization: Energy K System X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77C-CCK-MCD {C-UDP; EBM-APPLE} (Macintosh; U; PPC) X-Accept-Language: en,pdf MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: U.S. DoE Will Review 15-Years of "Cold Fusion" Excess Heat and NuclearEvidence References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53642 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Horace Heffner wrote: > At 9:01 AM 3/22/4, Steve Krivit wrote: > >Horace: > > > >You may like to know that the DOE people in charge of the review have > >received a copy of the following: > > > >http://www.newenergytimes.com/reports/Review20ColdFusionPapers.htm > > > > > >Steve > > An interesting cross-section. Thanks for posting. > > One thing seems really apparent at this point. There has not been > sufficient replication work in the field, independent work at differing > locations by differing teams. Horace, I wonder what you mean by "sufficient replication work". How much is sufficient and sufficient for what purpose? If the intent is to convince a skeptic who does not trust calorimetry, then no amount would be "sufficient". If the intent is to explore the important variables to see if these variables are sufficiently well understood to make the effect work at another laboratory, then this has been done many times. Granted, not all aspects of what has been observed have been replicated. Also, some attempts fail occasionally. But are these "sufficient" reasons to think that a real novel phenomenon has not been discovered? > Not enough true replication, without either > "ego modifications" or the corner cutting necessitated by highly limited > budgets. If there is an area where significant government support is > justified, then that must be it. I suggest support should not be directed toward replication. The issue now is to learn how to amplify the effect so that commercial heat can be produced. This means that the known variables need to be explored, which will frequently produce negative results. Such negative results are very valuable because they show the negative limits of the variables. Once the negative limits are known, the direction required to produce positive becomes obvious. > > > A troublesome problem if funding were to be made available for replications > is who gets the support? What experiments are to be replicated? Hopefully > someone who has taken a strongly adversarial position, like Parks or > Huezenga, would not be in charge of such choices! Being the pessimist that I have revealed myself to be, I predict that most government funding will be controlled by the skeptics. Because they believe the effect is nonsense, they will give money to people who will reinforce this conclusion. Only occasionally will some good work be done that will slowly change the attitude, while a lot of money and time will be wasted. Regards, Ed > > > Regards, > > Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 22 12:37:50 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2MKbhaT005852; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 12:37:45 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2MKbSap005811; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 12:37:28 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 12:37:28 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <405F4E97.9040508 rtpatlanta.com> Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 15:37:43 -0500 From: "Terry Blanton" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Opportunity Slips . . . Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53643 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: . . . while trying to get out of the Eagle: http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/n/056/1N133164713EFF0700P1705R0M1.JPG you can see where the "sand" has slipped back toward the rover. NASA is seeking another approach to Exit the Eagle. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 22 13:12:22 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2MLC13K011827; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 13:12:07 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2MLBqCd011745; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 13:11:52 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 13:11:52 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 12:17:40 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Sheetmetal on Mars? Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53644 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: See: and the bunch of associated Sol 65 Spirit navcam photos. It looks like there might be a sheet of material poking up from the sand. Maybe not too. Those who can make color composites might want to see if the material looks like sheetmetal. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 22 16:27:57 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2N0RlaT029240; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 16:27:48 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2N0ReJW029218; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 16:27:40 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 16:27:40 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.1.4.030702.0 Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 19:31:29 -0500 Subject: Mars announcement tomorrow From: "Eugene F. Mallove" To: "vortex l eskimo.com" Message-ID: Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53645 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: I caught something on the Fox News scrolling text that NASA will be making an announcement tomorrow -- 3/23 -- about a major scientific finding on Mars.. Well, they can't be dealing with water, can they? -- they've already hit that. So, what will it be???? - Gene Mallove From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 22 17:07:07 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2N1703K014374; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 17:07:00 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2N16w3p014363; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 17:06:58 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 17:06:58 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Authentication-Warning: eskimo.com: billb owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 17:07:00 -0800 (PST) From: William Beaty To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: ISBL04 Last Call for papers (fwd) Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-ID: Resent-Message-ID: <5VJbU.A.XgD.x24XAB ultra5.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53646 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Call for papers at International Symposium on Ball Lightning in Taiwan. Anyone interested? I can forward the half-meg attachment to you. (((((((((((((((((( ( ( ( ( (O) ) ) ) ) ))))))))))))))))))) William J. Beaty SCIENCE HOBBYIST website billb eskimo.com http://amasci.com EE/programmer/sci-exhibits amateur science, hobby projects, sci fair Seattle, WA 206-789-0775 unusual phenomena, tesla coils, weird sci ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 16:51:33 +0900 From: Hideho OFURUTON To: Subject: ISBL04 Last Call for papers Dear Sirs, We apologize for sending the Last Call for Papers of ISBL04 (8th International Symposium on Ball Lightning in Taiwan, 3rd - 6th August) so late. We postponed the deadlines, because we hope that many people come to this beautiful island and attend the symposium. And we also send a essay written by Dr.Kamogawa, one of the chairpersons of this symposium, who visited Taiwan many times to make his research. We look forward to seeing you in Taiwan this summer. Yours sincerely Ofuruton, Hideho Tokyo Metropolitan College of Aeronautical Engineering From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 22 17:10:19 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2N1AGaT006247; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 17:10:16 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2N1AFVl006237; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 17:10:15 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 17:10:15 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Authentication-Warning: eskimo.com: billb owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 17:10:43 -0800 (PST) From: William Beaty To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: NEW REPORT ESTABLISHES CASE FOR COLD FUSION In-Reply-To: <5.2.0.9.2.20040322110754.00ab1e70 mail.dlsi.net> Message-ID: References: <5.2.0.9.2.20040322110754.00ab1e70 mail.dlsi.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Resent-Message-ID: <2w68t.A.ZhB.354XAB ultra6.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53647 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: On Mon, 22 Mar 2004, Steve Krivit wrote: > Fusion," will be published in the April 1 Web edition of Physics Today, at > www.physicstoday.org . The april first edition? :) (((((((((((((((((( ( ( ( ( (O) ) ) ) ) ))))))))))))))))))) William J. Beaty SCIENCE HOBBYIST website billb eskimo.com http://amasci.com EE/programmer/sci-exhibits amateur science, hobby projects, sci fair Seattle, WA 206-789-0775 unusual phenomena, tesla coils, weird sci From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 22 17:24:59 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2N1OtaT009123; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 17:24:55 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2N1OsoX009106; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 17:24:54 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 17:24:54 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <002501c41075$b1aba250$6401a8c0 Craig> From: "SnowDog" To: References: Subject: Re: Mars announcement tomorrow Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 19:25:14 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53648 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: > I caught something on the Fox News scrolling text that NASA will be making > an announcement tomorrow -- 3/23 -- about a major scientific finding on > Mars.. > > Well, they can't be dealing with water, can they? -- they've already hit > that. So, what will it be???? Report of the Announcement: http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/opportunity_announcement_040322.html Craig Haynie From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 22 17:43:28 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2N1hKaT014913; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 17:43:20 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2N1hJ4R014902; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 17:43:19 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 17:43:19 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Reply-To: From: "Keith Nagel" To: Subject: RE: Mars announcement tomorrow Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 21:09:16 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <002501c41075$b1aba250$6401a8c0 Craig> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Importance: Normal X-Rcpt-To: Resent-Message-ID: <_gzcLB.A.yoD.2Y5XAB ultra6.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53649 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Tune your browsers into http://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/nasatv/ at about 1:45pm EST tomorow and grab a thread before they're all eaten. K. PS Some more linkz http://www.ascribe.org/cgi-bin/spew4th.pl?ascribeid=20040322.112505&time=12% 2008%20PST&year=2004&public=1 http://www.astrobio.net/news/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&s id=888&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0 Sorry for the breaking. Anyone know a mail client neutral method of preventing this? I've tried the <> and >< trick and neither works. -----Original Message----- From: SnowDog [mailto:SnowDog GoldDirectory.com] Sent: Monday, March 22, 2004 8:25 PM To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Mars announcement tomorrow > I caught something on the Fox News scrolling text that NASA will be making > an announcement tomorrow -- 3/23 -- about a major scientific finding on > Mars.. > > Well, they can't be dealing with water, can they? -- they've already hit > that. So, what will it be???? Report of the Announcement: http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/opportunity_announcement_040322.html Craig Haynie From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 22 18:48:54 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2N2ml3K008992; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 18:48:47 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2N2mjN3008977; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 18:48:45 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 18:48:45 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <405FA61A.6060508 rtpatlanta.com> Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 21:51:06 -0500 From: Terry Blanton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: [OT]Likely Lichen . . . Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <7XGEoC.A.NMC.MW6XAB ultra5.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53650 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: . . . is killing the elk: http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&cid=1850&u=/cpress/20040322/ca_pr_on_sc/elk_deaths_6&printer=1 (Not about Mars) From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 22 19:01:43 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2N31caT004250; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 19:01:38 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2N31YMu004225; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 19:01:34 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 19:01:34 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 18:07:54 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: Asteroid flyby tonight Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53651 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 10:26 AM 3/22/4, thomas malloy wrote: >Horace Heffner replied > >>course if you assume just a bit more velocity than escape velocity you get >>right back up to about 1 megaton TNT. It's in that ballpark for sure. If >>you happen to be in the impact area I doubt the difference will be >>significant! 8^) > >Doesn't it depend on the angle of incidence? Yes. To a fairly large angle the higher the angle of incidence the larger the blast and char area. Suppose the glide slope is about 1:10, and a 10 megaton impactor starts radiating significantly at an altitude of about 60 km. The blast and char area will be elongated. I think a 1 megaton device can char and start fires at 80 km, certainly at 60. The char area could average 60 km wide and 600 km long, about 36,000 square km. If the thing just impacted vertically a 60 km char radius would only produce an 11,000 square km char area. Even if the meteor does not radiate much, then the full energy will be at impact, and the crater itself will be elongated, and thus the damage area will be larger. Ignoring the effect of gravity increasing the angle of incidence upon approach, the proportion of meteors having a glide slope greater than 1/10 is roughly sin((Pi/2) - arctan(1/10))^2 = .99, so the vast majority of meteors impacting earth should have a glide slope larger than 1:10. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 22 19:03:23 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2N33IaT005654; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 19:03:18 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2N33H9h005631; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 19:03:17 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 19:03:17 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 18:09:45 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: [OT]Likely Lichen . . . Resent-Message-ID: <1_v-0B.A.3XB.1j6XAB ultra6.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53652 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 9:51 PM 3/22/4, Terry Blanton wrote: > . . . is killing the elk: > >http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&cid=1850&u=/cpress/20040322/ca_pr_on >_sc/elk_deaths_6&printer=1 > >(Not about Mars) Only logical explanation is that some of the elk (the unaffected) are from Mars. 8^) Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 22 20:22:09 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2N4M5aT021779; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 20:22:05 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2N4M4Bn021763; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 20:22:04 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 20:22:04 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-Id: <2.2.32.20040323042022.0068f584 pop.freeserve.net> X-Sender: grimer2.freeserve.co.uk pop.freeserve.net X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 2.2 (32) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 04:20:22 +0000 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Grimer Subject: Re: [OT]Likely Lichen . . . Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53653 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 06:09 pm 22-03-04 -0900, you wrote: >At 9:51 PM 3/22/4, Terry Blanton wrote: >> . . . is killing the elk: >> >>http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&cid=1850&u=/cpress/20040322/ca_pr_on >>_sc/elk_deaths_6&printer=1 >> >>(Not about Mars) > > >Only logical explanation is that some of the elk (the unaffected) are from >Mars. 8^) > >Regards, > >Horace Heffner Little green elk, presumably Cheers Frank grimer From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 22 22:42:19 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2N6gGar028543; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 22:42:16 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2N6gBE7028519; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 22:42:11 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 22:42:11 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f From: "explorecraft" To: "Vortex-L" Subject: NASA announcement Accepting Velikovsky's Mars Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 13:40:37 +0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - lester.switchfusion.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - eskimo.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - explorecraft.com Resent-Message-ID: <4MB0T.A.i9G.Dx9XAB ultra5.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53654 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Or Not... ...you think? A formerly wet planet with massively long-lived oceans as well as a respectable atmosphere that just vanished one fine day? Littered with sulfurous remnants of venusian debris? Probably not, but the truth is out there.... From: http://www.unmuseum.org/velikov.htm Isaac Asimov, who referred to Velikovsky's theories as a type of "exoheresy" wrote: "For one thing Velikfovskianism, and indeed, any exoheretical view that becomes prominent enough to force itself on science, acts to puncture scientific complacency-and that is good. An exoheresy may cause scientists... > -----Original Message----- > From: Keith Nagel [mailto:knagel gis.net] > Sent: Tuesday, 2004 March 23 09:09 > To: vortex-l eskimo.com > Subject: RE: Mars announcement tomorrow > > > Tune your browsers into > > http://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/nasatv/ > > at about 1:45pm EST tomorow and grab a thread before they're > all eaten. > > K. > > PS Some more linkz > > http://www.ascribe.org/cgi-bin/spew4th.pl?ascribeid=20040322.11250 5&time=12% 2008%20PST&year=2004&public=1 http://www.astrobio.net/news/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&s id=888&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0 Sorry for the breaking. Anyone know a mail client neutral method of preventing this? I've tried the <> and >< trick and neither works. -----Original Message----- From: SnowDog [mailto:SnowDog GoldDirectory.com] Sent: Monday, March 22, 2004 8:25 PM To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Mars announcement tomorrow > I caught something on the Fox News scrolling text that NASA will be making > an announcement tomorrow -- 3/23 -- about a major scientific finding on > Mars.. > > Well, they can't be dealing with water, can they? -- they've already hit > that. So, what will it be???? Report of the Announcement: http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/opportunity_announcement_040322.html Craig Haynie From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 22 23:12:50 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2N7CjWH021386; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 23:12:46 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2N7Ciha021368; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 23:12:44 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 23:12:44 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 22:19:12 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: [OT]Likely Lichen . . . Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53655 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 7:20 PM 3/22/4, Grimer wrote: >Little green elk, presumably Indeed, the pulsating LGE (little green elk), sometimes here, sometimes not, kind of both here and not at the same time, yet still pulsating in both places. Somewhat like quantum cats, except not just live and not live, but rather here and on Mars, until sampled that is! Mmmmmmm elllllllk! Yummy! Oooops, that's moooooose! Yummmmmy! Mooooose! Alaskans say that 12,000 wolves can't all be wrong about that! 8^) That brings back memories about when pulsars were discovered. They called them LGMs (little green men). Who could imagine at that time a star that could pulse in a matter of seconds. How far we have come. How far we have to go. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 23 00:52:56 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2N8qplD005977; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 00:52:51 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2N8qoke005964; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 00:52:50 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 00:52:50 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net (Unverified) Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 23:59:18 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: U.S. DoE Will Review 15-Years of "Cold Fusion" Excess Heat and NuclearEvidence Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53656 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: At 11:39 AM 3/22/4, Edmund Storms wrote: >Horace, I wonder what you mean by "sufficient replication work". How much is >sufficient and sufficient for what purpose? If the intent is to convince a >skeptic who does not trust calorimetry, then no amount would be "sufficient". >If the intent is to explore the important variables to see if these variables >are sufficiently well understood to make the effect work at another >laboratory, then this has been done many times. Granted, not all aspects of >what has been observed have been replicated. Also, some attempts fail >occasionally. But are these "sufficient" reasons to think that a real novel >phenomenon has not been discovered? The answer depends upon the audience. You seem to be approaching this issue as science as usual, which is completely understandable. As one who is accomplished in the field, and to a large extent aquainted with the work of your collegues, and to some extent aqainted with those collegues in person, you seem to be treating the situation as science as normal. You know the anamolies are real. You trust the work of your collegues. Cold fusion, LENR, is not science as normal. It is, if not at minimum completely foreign to many scientists, it is anathema. It is to the general scientific audience, in the words of Carl Sagan, an extraordinary claim requiring extraordinary proof. You must admit, and I think you have, that any replications which have occurred have not been exact, and in fact have been limited in quality by both cost and therefore the ability to refine and make exact. For the audience at hand, there has not been sufficient replication work in the field, independent work at differing locations by differing teams. there has not been enough true replication, without either "ego modifications" or the corner cutting necessitated by highly limited budgets. Incontrovertable proof is required of at least one nuclear anomaly worth funding for rigorous scientific investigation. >I suggest support should not be directed toward replication. The issue now is >to learn how to amplify the effect so that commercial heat can be produced. >This means that the known variables need to be explored, which will frequently >produce negative results. Such negative results are very valuable because >they show the negative limits of the variables. Once the negative limits are >known, the direction required to produce positive becomes obvious. This is so true, in the traditional scientific sense. However, the issue at hand is not in the realm of traditional science. Far from it. We are indeed confronted with evidence for a pardigm shift in theory, and to many scientists this is not palatable. >Being the pessimist that I have revealed myself to be, I predict that most >government funding will be controlled by the skeptics. Because they believe >the effect is nonsense, they will give money to people who will reinforce this >conclusion. Only occasionally will some good work be done that will slowly >change the attitude, while a lot of money and time will be wasted. Agreed! This is the most likely outcome. However, being aware of the probable outcome is in itself an empowering position. Therefore, if things progress far enough, a focus must be maintained upon the process of selection of those who will make any allocations of resources. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 23 03:09:58 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2NB9rFX013637; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 03:09:54 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2NB9qNS013626; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 03:09:52 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 03:09:52 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f From: Erikbaard aol.com Message-ID: <53.7a05d75.2d9174fd aol.com> Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 06:09:49 EST Subject: Damadian gets Prize for MRI...business. To: vortex-l eskimo.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_53.7a05d75.2d9174fd_boundary" X-Mailer: 8.0 for Windows sub 6024 Resent-Message-ID: <8QT2FC.A.2UD.AsBYAB ultra5.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53657 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: --part1_53.7a05d75.2d9174fd_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit http://www.nytimes.com/2004/03/23/science/23PRIZ.html <<< NYT article. Denied Nobel for M.R.I., He Wins Another Prize By KENNETH CHANG Published: March 23, 2004 Last fall, Dr. Raymond V. Damadian was denied a Nobel Prize for his role in the development of magnetic resonance imaging. But he won a consolation prize last week, when the Franklin Institute in Philadelphia recognized his business acumen in making the idea profitable. Dr. Damadian, the president of Fonar Inc. of Melville, N.Y., a manufacturer of M.R.I. machines, complained loudly and publicly after the Nobel Prize in Medicine last year, recognizing "discoveries concerning magnetic resonance imaging," went to Dr. Paul C. Lauterbur of the University of Illinois and Sir Peter Mansfield of the University of Nottingham in England.>> --part1_53.7a05d75.2d9174fd_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable http://www.nytimes.com/2004/03/23/science/23P= RIZ.html

<<<
NYT article.

Denied Nobel for M.R.I., He Wins Another Prize

By KENNETH CHANG


Published: March 23, 2004

Last fall, Dr. Raymond V. Damadian was denied a Nobel Prize for his role in=20= the development of magnetic resonance imaging. But he won a consolation priz= e last week, when the Franklin Institute in Philadelphia recognized his busi= ness acumen in making the idea profitable.

Dr. Damadian, the president of Fonar Inc. of Melville, N.Y., a manufacturer=20= of M.R.I. machines, complained loudly and publicly after the Nobel Prize in=20= Medicine last year, recognizing "discoveries concerning magnetic resonance i= maging," went to Dr. Paul C. Lauterbur of the University of Illinois and Sir= Peter Mansfield of the University of Nottingham in England.>>
<= /HTML> --part1_53.7a05d75.2d9174fd_boundary-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 23 04:49:21 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2NCnFFX031132; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 04:49:15 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2NCnDT2031115; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 04:49:13 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 04:49:13 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <00df01c410cc$c82a3a80$8680b341 computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: Subject: Re: Superoxide Anions and Over-Unity Electrolysis Cells? Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 05:48:35 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-ELNK-Trace: 0b1c9d71006e06a171639b933de7ae6f7e972de0d01da940177140c1d197258c0c5ac15318e2dc8f350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53658 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Dr. Kimball's "Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS)" article: http://users.rcn.com/jkimball.ma.ultranet/BiologyPages/R/ROS.html And: http://www.astaxanthin.org/oxidation.htm Both articles seem to offer a possible explanation of "O-U" in electrolysis cells, if stray atmospheric or electrons from equipment ground "static electricity", enter into the electrolysis process. Regards, Frederick From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 23 07:16:25 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2NFGKlD010779; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 07:16:20 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2NFGIt3010764; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 07:16:18 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 07:16:18 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <000d01c410e9$d83d31d0$4c7cccd1 MIKEBY3NR533HT> From: "Mike Carrell" To: References: <00df01c410cc$c82a3a80$8680b341 computer> Subject: Re: Superoxide Anions and Over-Unity Electrolysis Cells? Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 10:12:54 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53659 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: ----- Original Message ----- From: "Frederick Sparber" > Dr. Kimball's "Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS)" article: > > http://users.rcn.com/jkimball.ma.ultranet/BiologyPages/R/ROS.html > > And: > > http://www.astaxanthin.org/oxidation.htm > > Both articles seem to offer a possible explanation of "O-U" in electrolysis cells, if > stray atmospheric or electrons from equipment ground "static electricity", enter into > the electrolysis process. [Equipment ground "static electricity"] is a confusion of terms. Static electricity is by definition static, not current, and associated with insulators, not wet conductive electrolytic cells. "OU" in electrolytic cells is associated with heat production, transmutation, and nuclear "ash", which are not produced by the cited reactions. "Stray atomspheric electrons" get thoroughly grounded by the wet conductive environment of electrolytic cells. Mike Carrell From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 23 08:39:59 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2NGdqlD031949; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 08:39:53 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2NGdpsO031939; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 08:39:51 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 08:39:51 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <008401c410f5$5dabf940$8837fea9 cpq> From: "Jones Beene" To: References: <00df01c410cc$c82a3a80$8680b341 computer> <000d01c410e9$d83d31d0$4c7cccd1@MIKEBY3NR533HT> Subject: Re: Superoxide Anions and Over-Unity Electrolysis Cells? Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 08:38:47 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ultra6.eskimo.com id i2NGdhlD031912 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53660 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Mike, You wrote, " 'Stray atomspheric electrons' get thoroughly grounded by the wet conductive environment of electrolytic cells." Although what you say is standard textbook logic, let me throw out another possibility. (you may correctly suspect from the length of this post, that I was lying-in-wait for just this kind of segue ) Lets begin with the arc discharge invention of Dr. Peter Graneau, which is said by him to convert chemical bond energy into kinetic energy. One problem with that explanation is that the energy dynamics of the experiment make it clearly OU, but the thermodynamics are clouded by hydrogen bonding issues and the type of water used, which is natural rain water. It is not easy to write Graneau off as some misinformed free-energy nut. The important question then is where does the excess energy come from? This does not look like measurement error to me but the fact that 'rain water' or some equivalent, must be used in the arc discharge is a critical issue. The possibilities for free energy include the same variations of many experiments that are discussed on vortex, either: 1) cold fusion (but where is the ash?) 2) the hydrino (but where is the catalyst or the EUV?) 3) ZPE by way of some QM interaction like tunneling, but QM reactions are low probability but in addition, there is: 4) a higher energy metastable state that exists in certain types of water that could be related to the capture of 'atmospheric electrons' within the natural water icosahedron. Bond breaking always requires energy input, of course. Otherwise everything would fall apart all by itself. Covalent bond-making releases lots of energy and requires lots of energy input, but in the case of hydrogen bonding, the thermodynamics are distinctly different. While the molecular movements within liquid water require the constant breaking and reorganization of individual hydrogen bonds on a picosecond timescale, the process must necessarily be nearly lossless, due to the enormous "transaction volume." Some chemists will tell you that the formula for water, on this time scale, looks more like H1.6O than H2O. The instantaneous degree of hydrogen-bonding is surprisingly only slightly higher (95%) at about 0°C than at 100°C (85%). Therefore in this case, there is temperature-dependent competition between the ordering effects of hydrogen-bonding and disordering kinetic effects. If the time-averaged hydrogen-bonded network possesses a degree of structural order, then there is the potential for some enthalpy to be available when that is massively phase-disrupted. Therefore it might also be correct to say that hydrogen bond breaking always requires energy input, but not necessarily *net* energy input. However, this could not account for the COP of 2 that Graneau has found unless there is also an ingrained but hidden source of metastability. There is a natural tendency for all "systems" to end at the lowest free energy state (Gibbs free energy...actually a restatement of the 2ndLaw). And some energy can be released after the hydrogen bond is broken even though it may also require some energy to break the bond - but that bond-breaking energy can be supplied in whole or in part by a captured electron, if the proper geometry is present. This geometry may exist naturally because water is unique in that it *should be a gas* (looking at its gaseous constituents). The reason for this is indeed *geometric* and it relates to a natural "favored" structure and exact dimension, which is (not coincidentally) the same as the Casimir geometry. Consider that the thermodynamic rationale for the formation of interfacial water vapor is that the loss of hydrogen bonds at the surface increases the enthalpy in the gas phase, so necessitating the water molecules to compensate by doing pressure-volume work, i.e. the network expands to form lower-density water with higher entropy. I suspect that hydrogen bonding itself can vacillate between metastable states, and when an aqueous electron is present, hydrogen bonded structures can provide a source of free-energy that way. But the energy of formation of hydrogen bonds is only 2.3 kJ/g which is relatively insignificant when we are looking for substantial free energy COP >2. Let's just consider another kind of metastable state. Actually this explanation is much easier to shoehorn into conventional physics than any of the other choices for OU, but is there any justification for it? Fred says that the metastable state should be one in which some of the electrons of the water molecules are trapped in a "potential well" as they are raised to higher energy levels by incident photons (sunlight), but they can subsequently be released from this state by "agitation" like an arc discharge arising in the over-unity experiments, or cavitation and sonoluminescence, for instance, thus releasing energy (as heat) when they are "stimulated" to drop from this energy trap. This explanation actually ties into a previous post about fluorescence and the Forster radius. That active electron in fluorescence is trapped within (actually AROUND) the 280 molecule icosahedron that comprises the p-solid content of rainwater. The best fluorescence performance is found in structures at 2-10 nm which includes many crystals, some plasma inter-ionic distances, and of course, molecular diameters of certain macromolecules such as polymers, AND also the 280 molecule water icsoahedron, with its diameter of 3 nm. This cluster can be seen at: http://www.sbu.ac.uk/water/clusters.html It is no accident that this 2-10 nm Forster radius includes the de Broglie wavelength of thermalized aqueous electrons of the type one might expect to find as free electrons in the atmosphere. Nor is it any accident that the water icosahedron can contain one or more charged species, but yet appear "neutral," due to slight polar shifting in the 280 molecule structure, or more likely due to the coincident capture of free protons. When injected by Graneau's high voltage capacitor discharge of 39.8 Joules, normal rainwater is accelerated into a cold fog that loses about 31.2 Joules of low-grade heat and a comparable amount (29.2 Joules) in fog kinetic energy output. As reported in the Journal of Plasma Physics, the output energy thus exceeds the input energy by about 100% creating a 2-to-1 overunity condition despite using high grade energy (electricity) to produce low grade energy (heat). A *net* OU producer of high grade energy would require a COP of at least 4-5, given Carnot normal conversion limitations. Perhaps Graneau thinks this is within the realm of possibility. But we must ask, how could shielded trapped electrons/protons in rainwater provide the energy necessary for a COP of 2 ? And if so, how much net energy is available on a per liter basis? Electron transfer occurs in every redox reaction. This process proceeds by an electron tunneling from the donor to the acceptor site, just as in fluorescence. When electron transfer reactions occur in the aqueous phase, in which the redox sites are strongly solvated, the reaction is tightly coupled to the motions of the solvent molecules and their overall structural confinement. Therein lies one factor suggesting that cold water or ice may be more active in QM terms. Strong quantum mechanical effects often dominate in these fluorescent-like systems. A mole of rainwater, about 18 grams might contain 10^21 metastable icosahedrons. If every one were fully "loaded" with one free proton and one free electron, which will combine with an energy of 13.6 eV when strongly "agitated" then that might add about 4 kJ/g, (if my calculations are correct) but unfortunately, this is a long way off from being able to use water alone as a fuel....For that to occur, one would have to either further pretreat the metastable rainwater electrochemically to create a substantial amount of additional short-lived chemicals...or as mentioned earlier, utilize both of the two complementary factors at work in explosion dynamics: upshifting the time-denominated force to produce OU. I believe that Graneau has found free energy by electrolyzing rain water that contains natural free electrons. These experiments portend a conversion scheme, which I don't want to get into now, but requiring some hydrocarbon or other active component. Again I would add that a KEY factor in all of the bona fide claims that I have seen for water-fuel anomalies is that the electrolysis or discharge cell is designed around *air-flow* through the cell itself or else water which has been exposed to lots of air flow (rain water). This suggests that we are dealing with both efficient water-splitting and water super-oxidation - and that the real fuel is not hydrogen per se, nor even Brown's gas, but an assortment of short-lived hydroxyl intermediaries. All demanding the presence of ROS and the presence of atmospheric free-electrons. I think there is enough anecdotal evidence for water-fuel anomalies in the available literature to entice the committed free-energy experimenter to go forward with efforts, despite not being able to say where the OU could be coming from. Undoubtedly it would be helpful to have some glint of this, but the bottom line question for the experimenter wishing to exploit this is, are the potential rewards for success worth the admittedly small possibility that someone who didn't "know better" has really stumbled on the answer many years ago. With apologies for the complexity of the above posting, Jones From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 23 08:50:11 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2NGo1lD001460; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 08:50:01 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2NGo0jf001440; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 08:50:00 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 08:50:00 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <40606BA1.A59B6F4D ix.netcom.com> Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 08:53:53 -0800 From: Edmund Storms Organization: Energy K System X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77C-CCK-MCD {C-UDP; EBM-APPLE} (Macintosh; U; PPC) X-Accept-Language: en,pdf MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: U.S. DoE Will Review 15-Years of "Cold Fusion" Excess Heat and NuclearEvidence References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53661 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Horace Heffner wrote: > At 11:39 AM 3/22/4, Edmund Storms wrote: > > >Horace, I wonder what you mean by "sufficient replication work". How much is > >sufficient and sufficient for what purpose? If the intent is to convince a > >skeptic who does not trust calorimetry, then no amount would be "sufficient". > >If the intent is to explore the important variables to see if these variables > >are sufficiently well understood to make the effect work at another > >laboratory, then this has been done many times. Granted, not all aspects of > >what has been observed have been replicated. Also, some attempts fail > >occasionally. But are these "sufficient" reasons to think that a real novel > >phenomenon has not been discovered? > > The answer depends upon the audience. You seem to be approaching this > issue as science as usual, which is completely understandable. As one who > is accomplished in the field, and to a large extent aquainted with the work > of your collegues, and to some extent aqainted with those collegues in > person, you seem to be treating the situation as science as normal. You > know the anamolies are real. You trust the work of your collegues. Cold > fusion, LENR, is not science as normal. It is, if not at minimum > completely foreign to many scientists, it is anathema. It is to the > general scientific audience, in the words of Carl Sagan, an extraordinary > claim requiring extraordinary proof. You got my number. I admit I'm guilty of taking the scientific approach. Nevertheless, I also agree with your other point, that "normal" people are not influenced by the scientific approach. They instead need to be persuaded by methods used by advertisers and politicians. Nevertheless, in matters of science, in the end only the rules of science will carry the day. Sooner or later the demonstrations will have to achieve such obvious power that even a moron can believe. Obviously, it takes more than a moron to believe simple replications. If this were not true, scientists would have long ago accepted the phenomenon. > > > You must admit, and I think you have, that any replications which have > occurred have not been exact, and in fact have been limited in quality by > both cost and therefore the ability to refine and make exact. For the > audience at hand, there has not been sufficient replication work in the > field, independent work at differing locations by differing teams. there > has not been enough true replication, without either "ego modifications" or > the corner cutting necessitated by highly limited budgets. > Incontrovertable proof is required of at least one nuclear anomaly worth > funding for rigorous scientific investigation. All replication suffers from the limitations you describe. The only reason that you can get the same answer as I do when we run the same experiment is because the parameter space happens to be so big that we each have fallen within the active region, sometimes by design and sometimes by accident. Two experiments are seldom done exactly the same, even by the same experimenter. This situation is improved by using modern techniques, but only when the boundaries of parameter space are well known. Unfortunately, the boundaries of parameter space for LENR are not well known. > > > >I suggest support should not be directed toward replication. The issue now is > >to learn how to amplify the effect so that commercial heat can be produced. > >This means that the known variables need to be explored, which will frequently > >produce negative results. Such negative results are very valuable because > >they show the negative limits of the variables. Once the negative limits are > >known, the direction required to produce positive becomes obvious. > > This is so true, in the traditional scientific sense. However, the issue > at hand is not in the realm of traditional science. Far from it. We are > indeed confronted with evidence for a pardigm shift in theory, and to many > scientists this is not palatable. Very true. However, this problem keeps coming up in science and would seem to be a natural, but frustrating, aspect of normal science. The past examples always gained acceptance by beating the skeptics over the head with facts. Sooner or later the skeptics give up. The CF skeptics are now starting to weaken. > > > >Being the pessimist that I have revealed myself to be, I predict that most > >government funding will be controlled by the skeptics. Because they believe > >the effect is nonsense, they will give money to people who will reinforce this > >conclusion. Only occasionally will some good work be done that will slowly > >change the attitude, while a lot of money and time will be wasted. > > Agreed! This is the most likely outcome. However, being aware of the > probable outcome is in itself an empowering position. Therefore, if things > progress far enough, a focus must be maintained upon the process of > selection of those who will make any allocations of resources. I hope people of good intentions have the power and influence in this administration to do as you suggest. Unfortunately, other examples of decisions being made based on selfish self-interest do not give a person much hope that a rational approach will be used here. Regards, Ed > > > Regards, > > Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 23 09:30:07 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2NHU3FX004014; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 09:30:03 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2NHU0el003994; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 09:30:00 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 09:30:00 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-Id: <2.2.32.20040323172747.006c24fc pop.freeserve.net> X-Sender: grimer2.freeserve.co.uk pop.freeserve.net X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 2.2 (32) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 17:27:47 +0000 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Grimer Subject: Re: Superoxide Anions and Over-Unity Electrolysis Cells? Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ultra5.eskimo.com id i2NHTuFX003961 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53662 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 08:38 am 23-03-04 -0800, you wrote: >Mike, > >You wrote, " 'Stray atomspheric electrons' get thoroughly grounded by the wet conductive environment of electrolytic cells." > >Although what you say is standard textbook logic, let me throw out another possibility. (you may correctly suspect from the length of this post, that I was lying-in-wait for just this kind of segue ) > >Lets begin with the arc discharge invention of Dr. Peter Graneau, which is said by him to convert chemical bond energy into kinetic energy. One problem with that explanation is that the energy dynamics of the experiment make it clearly OU, but the thermodynamics are clouded by hydrogen bonding issues and the type of water used, which is natural rain water. It is not easy to write Graneau off as some misinformed free-energy nut. The important question then is where does the excess energy come from? This does not look like measurement error to me but the fact that 'rain water' or some equivalent, must be used in the arc discharge is a critical issue. > >The possibilities for free energy include the same variations of many experiments that are discussed on vortex, either: >1) cold fusion (but where is the ash?) >2) the hydrino (but where is the catalyst or the EUV?) >3) ZPE by way of some QM interaction like tunneling, but QM reactions are low probability > >but in addition, there is: > >4) a higher energy metastable state that exists in certain types of water that could be related to the capture of 'atmospheric electrons' within the natural water icosahedron. > >Bond breaking always requires energy input, of course. Otherwise everything would fall apart all by itself. Covalent bond-making releases lots of energy and requires lots of energy input, but in the case of hydrogen bonding, the thermodynamics are distinctly different. While the molecular movements within liquid water require the constant breaking and reorganization of individual hydrogen bonds on a picosecond timescale, the process must necessarily be nearly lossless, due to the enormous "transaction volume." Some chemists will tell you that the formula for water, on this time scale, looks more like H1.6O than H2O. > >The instantaneous degree of hydrogen-bonding is surprisingly only slightly higher (95%) at about 0°C than at 100°C (85%). Therefore in this case, there is temperature-dependent competition between the ordering effects of hydrogen-bonding and disordering kinetic effects. If the time-averaged hydrogen-bonded network possesses a degree of structural order, then there is the potential for some enthalpy to be available when that is massively phase-disrupted. Therefore it might also be correct to say that hydrogen bond breaking always requires energy input, but not necessarily *net* energy input. However, this could not account for the COP of 2 that Graneau has found unless there is also an ingrained but hidden source of metastability. > >There is a natural tendency for all "systems" to end at the lowest free energy state (Gibbs free energy...actually a restatement of the 2ndLaw). And some energy can be released after the hydrogen bond is broken even though it may also require some energy to break the bond - but that bond-breaking energy can be supplied in whole or in part by a captured electron, if the proper geometry is present. > >This geometry may exist naturally because water is unique in that it *should be a gas* (looking at its gaseous constituents). The reason for this is indeed *geometric* and it relates to a natural "favored" structure and exact dimension, which is (not coincidentally) the same as the Casimir geometry. > >Consider that the thermodynamic rationale for the formation of interfacial water vapor is that the loss of hydrogen bonds at the surface increases the enthalpy in the gas phase, so necessitating the water molecules to compensate by doing pressure-volume work, i.e. the network expands to form lower-density water with higher entropy. I suspect that hydrogen bonding itself can vacillate between metastable states, and when an aqueous electron is present, hydrogen bonded structures can provide a source of free-energy that way. But the energy of formation of hydrogen bonds is only 2.3 kJ/g which is relatively insignificant when we are looking for substantial free energy COP >2. > >Let's just consider another kind of metastable state. Actually this explanation is much easier to shoehorn into conventional physics than any of the other choices for OU, but is there any justification for it? Fred says that the metastable state should be one in which some of the electrons of the water molecules are trapped in a "potential well" as they are raised to higher energy levels by incident photons (sunlight), but they can subsequently be released from this state by "agitation" like an arc discharge arising in the over-unity experiments, or cavitation and sonoluminescence, for instance, thus releasing energy (as heat) when they are "stimulated" to drop from this energy trap. > >This explanation actually ties into a previous post about fluorescence and the Forster radius. That active electron in fluorescence is trapped within (actually AROUND) the 280 molecule icosahedron that comprises the p-solid content of rainwater. The best fluorescence performance is found in structures at 2-10 nm which includes many crystals, some plasma inter-ionic distances, and of course, molecular diameters of certain macromolecules such as polymers, AND also the 280 molecule water icsoahedron, with its diameter of 3 nm. This cluster can be seen at: >http://www.sbu.ac.uk/water/clusters.html > >It is no accident that this 2-10 nm Forster radius includes the de Broglie wavelength of thermalized aqueous electrons of the type one might expect to find as free electrons in the atmosphere. Nor is it any accident that the water icosahedron can contain one or more charged species, but yet appear "neutral," due to slight polar shifting in the 280 molecule structure, or more likely due to the coincident capture of free protons. > >When injected by Graneau's high voltage capacitor discharge of 39.8 Joules, normal rainwater is accelerated into a cold fog that loses about 31.2 Joules of low-grade heat and a comparable amount (29.2 Joules) in fog kinetic energy output. As reported in the Journal of Plasma Physics, the output energy thus exceeds the input energy by about 100% creating a 2-to-1 overunity condition despite using high grade energy (electricity) to produce low grade energy (heat). A *net* OU producer of high grade energy would require a COP of at least 4-5, given Carnot normal conversion limitations. Perhaps Graneau thinks this is within the realm of possibility. > >But we must ask, how could shielded trapped electrons/protons in rainwater provide the energy necessary for a COP of 2 ? And if so, how much net energy is available on a per liter basis? Electron transfer occurs in every redox reaction. This process proceeds by an electron tunneling from the donor to the acceptor site, just as in fluorescence. When electron transfer reactions occur in the aqueous phase, in which the redox sites are strongly solvated, the reaction is tightly coupled to the motions of the solvent molecules and their overall structural confinement. Therein lies one factor suggesting that cold water or ice may be more active in QM terms. Strong quantum mechanical effects often dominate in these fluorescent-like systems. > >A mole of rainwater, about 18 grams might contain 10^21 metastable icosahedrons. If every one were fully "loaded" with one free proton and one free electron, which will combine with an energy of 13.6 eV when strongly "agitated" then that might add about 4 kJ/g, (if my calculations are correct) but unfortunately, this is a long way off from being able to use water alone as a fuel....For that to occur, one would have to either further pretreat the metastable rainwater electrochemically to create a substantial amount of additional short-lived chemicals...or as mentioned earlier, utilize both of the two complementary factors at work in explosion dynamics: upshifting the time-denominated force to produce OU. > >I believe that Graneau has found free energy by electrolyzing rain water that contains natural free electrons. These experiments portend a conversion scheme, which I don't want to get into now, but requiring some hydrocarbon or other active component. Again I would add that a KEY factor in all of the bona fide claims that I have seen for water-fuel anomalies is that the electrolysis or discharge cell is designed around *air-flow* through the cell itself or else water which has been exposed to lots of air flow (rain water). This suggests that we are dealing with both efficient water-splitting and water super-oxidation - and that the real fuel is not hydrogen per se, nor even Brown's gas, but an assortment of short-lived hydroxyl intermediaries. All demanding the presence of ROS and the presence of atmospheric free-electrons. > >I think there is enough anecdotal evidence for water-fuel anomalies in the available literature to entice the committed free-energy experimenter to go forward with efforts, despite not being able to say where the OU could be coming from. Undoubtedly it would be helpful to have some glint of this, but the bottom line question for the experimenter wishing to exploit this is, are the potential rewards for success worth the admittedly small possibility that someone who didn't "know better" has really stumbled on the answer many years ago. > >With apologies for the complexity of the above posting, > >Jones I'm no chemist but that all sounds bloody good to me old bean. ;^) Mind you - I had to look up segue. :-( se·gue ( P ) Pronunciation Key (sgw, sgw) intr.v. se·gued, se·gue·ing, se·gues Music. To make a transition directly from one section or theme to another. To move smoothly and unhesitatingly from one state, condition, situation, or element to another: “Daylight segued into dusk” (Susan Dworski). Cheers Frank Grimer Err! my spelling checker didn't recognise it but it accepted segu and there ain't no such word - [stupid %**#! spell checker! :-( ] From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 23 09:47:57 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2NHlmlD017017; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 09:47:48 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2NHljMo017005; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 09:47:45 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 09:47:45 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 19:55:09 -0600 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: thomas malloy Subject: RE: Asteroid flyby tonight Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-DCC-CPI-Metrics: Clear 1161; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53663 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: How does the angle of incidence affect the amount of energy that the asteroid would release? From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 23 11:25:35 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2NJPOJx002340; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 11:25:25 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2NJP9Bp002260; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 11:25:09 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 11:25:09 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <40608EFA.9080905 rtpatlanta.com> Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 14:24:42 -0500 From: "Terry Blanton" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Profound NASA Announcement Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <1uzlKC.A.Mj.V8IYAB ultra5.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53664 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Opportunity's rocks are sedimentary and formed under water. Duh. They *did* use the 'F' word: "If you want to look for fossils on Mars, this is where to look." From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 23 15:36:21 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2NNaFbP027977; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 15:36:16 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2NNa3dS027933; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 15:36:03 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 15:36:03 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f From: Baronvolsung aol.com Message-ID: <15e.2cc0482d.2d9223dc aol.com> Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 18:35:56 EST Subject: Engineering Vortex Energy Fields In Crystals To Improve Solar Panel Efficiency To: vortex-l eskimo.com, Roundtable7@yahoogroups.com, mediator@mint.ocn.ne.jp, email mattruby.com CC: Baronvolsung aol.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1080084956" X-Mailer: 9.0 for Windows sub 5007 Resent-Message-ID: <-cj1dD.A.Y0G.jnMYAB ultra5.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53665 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: -------------------------------1080084956 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Engineering Vortex Energy Fields In Crystals To Improve Solar Panel Efficiency Low band gap materials can receive more solar energy since the band gap is so low, but the band gap also determines the strength or voltage and if it is low, then what we make up in extra current we lose by having small voltage, since power is voltage times current. We can engineer and change the ranges of the current vortex in relation to magnetic field strength and the voltage potential vortex in relation to electric field strength to obtain optimal power output in any low band gap material by manipulating the energy flow vortex properties with engineered nanotech and biochemical circuits; and engineered hybrid nanotech biochemical properties of the material. Changing the conductivity properties in a material changes the current vortex range, while changing the dielectric properties of the materials changes the voltage potential vortex range. Nanotech or biochemical artificially engineered magnetic or electric field circuits and hybrid materials etched into or placed into a material can also change the relation between the magnetic field and the electrical field which indirectly changes the current or voltage vortexes. We can also engineer and convert energy fields and monopolar particles which have one pole hidden in the vortex such as electrons into antiparticles such as positrons by changing the direction of the field vortex swirl, to cancel out the effect of the field on other fields. For instance a superconductor placed into a solar crystal will improve the conductivity and the current vortex range. A superdielectric placed into a solar crystal will improve the dielectric properties and the voltage range. Magnetic monopoles where the other pole is locked up inside of the vortex oscillation, do not exist in a vacuum, but may be engineered into a material which is not in a vacuum such as a crystal. Electric and magnetic monopoles, and antiparticles engineered into a crystal can change and cancel out magnetic and electric field effects in a crystal to change the current and voltage ranges. Different types of crystal materials engineered into a hybrid crystal can perform different functions. A trilithium crystal engineered into a basic sand crystal can store energy in the crystal as a trilithium hydrogen battery. Different types of crystal materials which resonate at different frequencies can be used to trap light and electrical energy into a band to create a transistor or logical "and" and "or" gate to be used to process the energy in a hybrid crystal. We can use a series of crystal energy transistors as described above to transmute energy from one form into another and from one frequency into another. We can transform solar light and laser fiber optical light into electrical energy by using a crystal energy transistor which has an ideal resonance to preserve the efficiency of the energy transfer. We can use fiber optical lines in homes to transfer solar and laser energy into a home, and place a simple energy transfer crystal at the plug outlets to transfer the energy into electrical energy to be used in older electrical circuits until new light and laser fiber optical and crystal circuits are used in appliances. We should be able to use ordinary sand made into glass to create the basic crystal base in the form of a dodecahedron and then we can engineer in other crystal components in nanotech and biochemical hybrid crystal structures and materials which receive all of the wavelengths of light; and then engineer in a series of super conductors, superdielectrics, electrical and magnetic monopoles, antiparticles, and microbiochemical energy circuits into macro energy field circuits that can transfer all of the wavelength's of light into laser light for fiber optical circuits or into electrical energy for electrical circuits to improve solar efficiency in solar panels. Full spectrum solar and cosmic radiation panels made from engineered crystals made out of sand will also be inexpensive and easily made in any location, since sand is available most everywhere. The equations for electric and magnetic energies that may be placed in circuits to manipulate the power ratio dependent on the material band gap are stated below: The integral of the Electric Field E from point a to b is minus the voltage. The integral of the Magnetic Field H from point a to be is the current. The geometry of the magnetic field from north to south has the eddy current as a vortex in the center creating a sphere, and the geometry of the electric field from north to south has the potential vortex voltage in the center creating a sphere. B (Magnetic Induction) = u (magnetic field constant) * H (Magnetic Field). D(Electric Displacement) = e (electric field constant) * E (Electric Field Strength) Baron Von Volsung, www.rhfweb.com\baron, Email: www.rhfweb.com\emailform.html President Thomas D. Clark, Email: www.rhfweb.com\emailform.html, Personal Web Page: www.rhfweb.com\personal New Age Production's Inc., www.rhfweb.com\newage Star Haven Community Services, at www.rhfweb.com\sh Radiation Health Foundation Trust at www.rhfweb.com -------------------------------1080084956 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Engineering Vortex Energy Fields In Crystals To Improve Solar Pane= l Efficiency
 
Low band gap materials can receive more solar energy since the band gap= is
so low, but the band gap also determines the strength or voltage a= nd if it is low, then what we make up in extra current we lose by having sma= ll voltage, since power is voltage times
current.  We can engineer and change the ranges of the c= urrent vortex in relation to magnetic field strength and the voltage po= tential vortex in relation to electric field strength to obta= in optimal power output in any low band gap material by manipulating th= e energy flow vortex properties with engineered nanotech and biochemica= l circuits; and engineered hybrid nanotech biochemical properties of th= e material.   Changing the conductivity properties in a mater= ial changes the current vortex range, while changing the dielectri= c properties of the materials changes the voltage potential vortex rang= e.  Nanotech or biochemical artificially engineered magnetic or electri= c field circuits and hybrid materials etched into or placed into a material=20= can also change the relation between the magnetic field and the electrical f= ield which indirectly changes the current or voltage vortexes.  We can=20= also engineer and convert energy fields and monopolar particles which h= ave one pole hidden in the vortex such as electrons into antiparti= cles such as positrons by changing the direction of the field vortex swirl,=20= to cancel out the effect of the field on other fields.
 
For instance a superconductor placed into a solar crystal will improve=20= the conductivity and the current vortex range.  A superdielectric place= d into a solar crystal will improve the dielectric properties and the voltag= e range.  Magnetic monopoles where the other pole is locked up inside o= f the vortex oscillation, do not exist in a vacuum, but may be engineered in= to a material which is not in a vacuum such as a crystal.  Electric and= magnetic monopoles, and antiparticles engineered into a crystal can change=20= and cancel out magnetic and electric field effects in a crystal to change th= e current and voltage ranges. 
 
Different types of crystal materials engineered into a hybrid crystal c= an perform different functions.  A trilithium crystal engineered into a= basic sand crystal can store energy in the crystal as a trilithium hyd= rogen battery.  Different types of crystal materials which resonate at=20= different frequencies can be used to trap light and electrical energy into a= band to create a transistor or logical "and" and "or" gate to be used to pr= ocess the energy in a hybrid crystal.  We can use a series of crystal e= nergy transistors as described above to transmute energy from one form=20= into another and from one frequency into another. We can transform solar lig= ht and laser fiber optical light into electrical energy by using a crystal e= nergy transistor which has an ideal resonance to preserve the efficiency of=20= the energy transfer. We can use fiber optical lines in homes to transfe= r solar and laser energy into a home, and place a simple energy transfer cry= stal at the plug outlets to transfer the energy into electrical energy=20= to be used in older electrical circuits until new light and laser fiber opti= cal and crystal circuits are used in appliances.
 
We should be able to use ordinary sand made into glass to cre= ate the basic crystal base in the form of a dodecahedron and=20= then we can engineer in other crystal components in nanotech and biochemical= hybrid crystal structures and materials which receive all of the wavelength= s of light; and then engineer in a series of super conductors, superdielectr= ics, electrical and magnetic monopoles, antiparticles, and microbiochemical=20= energy circuits into macro energy field circuits that can transfer all of th= e wavelength's of light into laser light for fiber optical circuits or into=20= electrical energy for electrical circuits to improve solar efficiency in sol= ar panels.   Full spectrum solar and cosmic radiation panels made=20= from engineered crystals made out of sand will also be inexpensive and easil= y made in any location, since sand is available most everywhere. 
 
The equations for electric and magnetic energies that may be placed in=20= circuits to manipulate the power ratio dependent on the material band gap&nb= sp;are stated below:
 
The integral of the Electric Field E from point a to b is minus th= e voltage.
The integral of the Magnetic Field H from point a to be is the cur= rent.
The geometry of the magnetic field from north to south has th= e eddy current as a vortex in the center creating a sphere, and the geo= metry of the electric field from north to south has the potential vortex vol= tage in the center creating a sphere.
 
B (Magnetic Induction) =3D u (magnetic field constant) * H (Magnetic Fi= eld).
D(Electric Displacement) =3D e (electric field constant) * E (Electric=20= Field Strength)
 
Baron Von Volsung, www.rhfweb.com\baron, Email: www.r= hfweb.com\emailform.html
President Thomas D. Clark,
Email: www.rhfweb.com\emailform.html, Personal Web Page: ww= w.rhfweb.com\personal
New Age Production's Inc., www.rhfweb.com\new= age
Star Haven Community Services, at www.rhfweb.com\sh
Radiation He= alth Foundation Trust at www.rhfweb.com
-------------------------------1080084956-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 23 16:00:52 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2O00mTf003020; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 16:00:48 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2O00gdi002992; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 16:00:42 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 16:00:42 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 15:07:18 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: RE: Asteroid flyby tonight Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53666 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 7:55 PM 3/22/4, thomas malloy wrote: >How does the angle of incidence affect the amount of energy that the >asteroid would release? This seems like a trick question. 8^) All the caluclations provided earlier assume only the mechanical energy due to momentum gained by a meteor from approaching the earth. Mechanical energy is conserved, so there would be a fixed amount of energy expended from any impact under that scenario, regardless of the angle of incidence. That assumes actual impact, not a glancing blow of some kind, which would be very unlikely anyway. What varies due to the angle of incidence is the immediate kill zone size. That increases as the angle of incidence increases, regardless of whether the energy is expended in the atmosphere or in the surface impact. By kill zone I mean the area of death and distruction due to mechanical debris impact or due to radiant energy. Worse than the effect of the angle of incidence for increasing kill zone area, per impact energy, is fragmentation. A 10 megaton TNT energy meteor split into ten 1 megaton TNT parts in widely differing impact points has a much larger kill zone. It seems unlikely to me that global extinction events would come from immediate kill zones though. Such extinctions have been hypothesised to come from seconday effects, like shrouding the earth in dust and smoke. Secondary effects might also be increased by a high angle of incidence, but mostly it is the energy of the meteor that matters for those. I seem to remember reading about some conjectures that Tunguska was a nuclear event, the theory being either it was an exploding spacecraft or somehow a comet impact with the atmosphere creating a fusion event. That kind of thing is way outside the scope of the calculations provided. It is also not necessary to explain the energy of the Tunguska impact, unless there is evidence of radioactivity. It might be necessary to explain the tree fall pattern or burn patterns if those indicate a specific point in the atmosphere where the blast occurred. That would require a massive fragmentation of a comet at a specific altitude to explain away the data by kinetic energy. I should note that the energy of an impact could be more than estimated, due to the relative motion of the earth and the impacting body due to their solar orbits. I only used the 11.18 km/s escape velocity from earth to estimate the impact energy. This gives conservative numbers. The impact velocity could be a lot higher. The earth solar orbit speed is around 30 km/s. A comet could approach at right angles to the orbit at a similar speed, so the relative velocity would be about 42 km/s plus the 11 km/s gained from gravity during the impact, giving 53 km/s. Since energy is proportional to speed squared, the energy per kg of meteor would be about 23 times that which I estimated. This pretty much establishes reasonable bounds on the energy though. The original computation, with any typos hopefully corrected, follows for convenience. You can conservatively assume an ateroid will impact the earth at around earth escape velocity (assuming of course the asteroid is not in earth orbit and the earth is chasing it.) Any higher initial relative velocity simply means larger energy upon impact. Escape velocity for earth is 11.18 km/s. Density of rock Rho can be assumed to be about 3 times water or 3 g/cm^3 = 3000 kg/m^3. The radius of the object is (100 ft/2) = 15.24 m. The mass of the object m = rho (4/3) Pi (r)^3 = (4/3) * 3.14 * (3000 kg/m^3) * (15.24 m)^3 = 4.45x10^7 kg. The energy is E = (1/2) m v^2 = (1/2)(4.45x10^7 kg)(11.18 km/s)^2 = 2.78x10^15 J. A kiloton of TNT = 4.184 x 10^12 J. The energy is thus (2.78x10^15 J)/(4.184 x 10^12 J/kT) = 665 kilotons TNT. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 23 17:51:16 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2O1pCTf028157; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 17:51:13 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2O1p6ow028122; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 17:51:06 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 17:51:06 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f From: FZNIDARSIC aol.com Message-ID: <7d.49c7f85a.2d9243a1 aol.com> Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 20:51:29 EST Subject: Report on trip to the Navel Weppons Lab To: vortex-l eskimo.com, JedRothwell@infinite-energy.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_7d.49c7f85a.2d9243a1_boundary" X-Mailer: 7.0 for Windows sub 10712 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53667 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: --part1_7d.49c7f85a.2d9243a1_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I drove to the Navel Weapons Lab on 23 March 04. They knew I was coming. I had no trouble getting in. I had to check my camera at the gate. I was allowed to take my audio tape recorder in. They had a full house with about 30 attendees. Most of the attendees were from the Navel Weapons Lab. There were a few more from industry. Advanced Cooling Technologies and Orin Technologies were there. I meet Mike Staker of the Army research Lab. Mike and I had a good talk. I gave Mike and many others a copy of my Zero Point Technologies CD. David Nagel gave his talk. David was a former manager at the Weapons Lab. David Nagel, Peter Hegelsiein, Mike McKrubre, and Randy Heckman went to the DOE in November. They met with Jim Decker at the DOE. Randy Heckman knows the secretary of energy. The DOE agreered to do a study on the new energy processes. David has a copy of my Zero Point Technologies CD. I would like to put some audio clips of his comment on future versions of my CD. He asked me to check with him first. The talk was fast and contained little new (new to me at least) information. It appeared that for many this was there first exposure to what was going on. He referenced Rothwell's LENTR web page. I saw a few writing down the URL. We will have wait what happens next. Frank Znidarsic --part1_7d.49c7f85a.2d9243a1_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I drove to the Navel Weapons Lab on= 23 March 04.  They knew I was coming.  I had no trouble getting i= n.    I had to check my camera at the gate.   I was= allowed to take my audio tape recorder in.  They had a full house with= about 30 attendees.  Most of the attendees were from the Navel Weapons= Lab.   There were a few more from industry.  Advanced Coolin= g Technologies and Orin Technologies were there.   I meet Mike Sta= ker of the Army research Lab.  Mike and I had a good talk.  I gave= Mike and many others a copy of my Zero Point Technologies CD.

David Nagel gave his talk. David was a former manager at the Weapons Lab.&nb= sp; David Nagel, Peter Hegelsiein, Mike McKrubre, and Randy Heckman went to=20= the DOE in November.  They met with Jim Decker at the DOE.  Randy=20= Heckman knows the secretary of energy. The DOE agreered to do a study on the= new energy processes.  David has a copy of my Zero Point Technologies=20= CD.  I would like to put some audio clips of his comment on future vers= ions of my CD.  He asked me to check with him first.

The talk was fast and contained little new (new to me at least) information.=   It appeared that for many this was there first exposure to what was g= oing on.  He referenced Rothwell's LENTR web page.  I saw a few wr= iting down the URL.

We will have wait what happens next.

Frank Znidarsic

--part1_7d.49c7f85a.2d9243a1_boundary-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 23 18:31:48 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2O2VgiN002140; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 18:31:43 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2O2Veac002125; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 18:31:40 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 18:31:40 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f From: FZNIDARSIC aol.com Message-ID: <129.3d61ac5e.2d924d08 aol.com> Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 21:31:36 EST Subject: Park's brain may fall out! NRL report cont. To: vortex-l eskimo.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_129.3d61ac5e.2d924d08_boundary" X-Mailer: 7.0 for Windows sub 10712 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53668 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: --part1_129.3d61ac5e.2d924d08_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit David Nagel asked Robert Park to keep an open mind. Park replied that he would but not to the extent that his brain would fall out. Frank Znidarsic --part1_129.3d61ac5e.2d924d08_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable David Nagel asked Robert Park to ke= ep an open mind.  Park replied that he would but not to the extent that= his brain would fall out.

Frank Znidarsic
--part1_129.3d61ac5e.2d924d08_boundary-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 23 19:10:54 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2O3AnAi009941; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 19:10:49 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2O3AhTK009894; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 19:10:43 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 19:10:43 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <002201c4114d$a706ef20$d57cccd1 MIKEBY3NR533HT> From: "Mike Carrell" To: References: <00df01c410cc$c82a3a80$8680b341 computer> <000d01c410e9$d83d31d0$4c7cccd1@MIKEBY3NR533HT> <008401c410f5$5dabf940$8837fea9@cpq> Subject: Re: Superoxide Anions and Over-Unity Electrolysis Cells? Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 22:08:09 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Resent-Message-ID: <1IRy-.A.haC.ywPYAB ultra6.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53669 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Jones wrote: > Mike, > > You wrote, " 'Stray atomspheric electrons' get thoroughly grounded by the wet conductive environment of electrolytic cells." > > Although what you say is standard textbook logic, let me throw out another possibility. (you may correctly suspect from the length of this post, that I was lying-in-wait for just this kind of segue ) Happy to give you an excuse for an interesting essay. I am acquainted with the Graneaus; in fact Peter invited me to join him in the bar after a seminar organized by Gene Mallove in Manchester some years ago [others joined in for a very interesting conversation]. I did not have all this in mind in my casual response to 'static electricity', which was in quotes. > The possibilities for free energy include the same variations of many experiments that are discussed on vortex, either: > 1) cold fusion (but where is the ash?) In low level experiments, a very careful setup is necessary to detect the nuclear ash and distinguish it from environmental contamination: See Arata and McKubre. The energy yield per atom is so high that little ash need be produced to for measurable heat to be seen. > 2) the hydrino (but where is the catalyst or the EUV?) As Mills has shown, water itself can be a source of H and O++, which is a catalyst. It is more or less efficiently produced by microwave fields in the BLP experiments, but it does not follow that the reaction will not occur in other environments, and contribute to an overall heat measurement. The EUV can be weak under these circumstances, and VUV totally absorbed by water. > 3) ZPE by way of some QM interaction like tunneling, but QM reactions are low probability > > but in addition, there is: > > 4) a higher energy metastable state that exists in certain types of water that could be related to the capture of 'atmospheric electrons' within the natural water icosahedron. A very interesting hypothesis. > I think there is enough anecdotal evidence for water-fuel anomalies in the available literature to entice the committed free-energy experimenter to go forward with efforts, despite not being able to say where the OU could be coming from. Undoubtedly it would be helpful to have some glint of this, but the bottom line question for the experimenter wishing to exploit this is, are the potential rewards for success worth the admittedly small possibility that someone who didn't "know better" has really stumbled on the answer many years ago. > > With apologies for the complexity of the above posting, A few details. Most CF electrolysis experiments are run with heavy water, distilled, not with rainwater which may accumulate energy by the process the Graneaus describe. The distilled D2O comes in sealed containers, so this pretty well excludes the above suggestions as to energy processes. There have been some indications of excess heat with light water, other than Mills' BLP process. Further, excess heat is generated by gaseous infusion in experiments by Case and McKubre. There may certainly be more than one OU process once one starts to look, and someday they may all be seen as different manifestations of some deeper phenomenon we do not yet perceive. I don't think understanding is served by denying the separate phenomena by implying that CF is 'really' BLP, or vice versa. Mike Carrell From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 23 19:12:34 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2O3CQvd009915; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 19:12:27 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2O3CPpp009906; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 19:12:25 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 19:12:25 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f From: Baronvolsung aol.com Message-ID: <6.24c1f15e.2d925696 aol.com> Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 22:12:22 EST Subject: Re: Superoxide Anions and Over-Unity Electrolysis Cells? To: vortex-l eskimo.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1080097942" X-Mailer: 9.0 for Windows sub 5007 Resent-Message-ID: <5lYbbB.A.uaC.ZyPYAB ultra5.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53670 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: -------------------------------1080097942 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 3/23/2004 10:18:01 AM Eastern Standard Time, mikec snip.net writes: [Equipment ground "static electricity"] is a confusion of terms. Static electricity is by definition static, not current, and associated with insulators, not wet conductive electrolytic cells. "OU" in electrolytic cells is associated with heat production, transmutation, and nuclear "ash", which are not produced by the cited reactions. "Stray atomspheric electrons" get thoroughly grounded by the wet conductive environment of electrolytic cells. According to Constantin Meyl in his book scalar waves or vortex wave theory, static electricity is caused in air (dielectric or insulator) when the potential counter vortex which is voltage electricity exceeds the current magnetic vortex energy. Counter vortex electrical voltage energy or scalar energy does exist in dielectrics or insulators, since the counter vortex electrical energy to a conductor of the magnetic current vortex is an insulator or dielectric. It is possible that over unity comes from the energy in the counter dielectric vortex voltage electrical energy that encircles the magnetic current vortex, when the dielectric vortex exceeds the current vortex. This explains why rain water may have more energy in it than normal water, since it picks up the scalar wave voltage electrons in the air, which are excited by the Graneau discharge invention to create overunity energy. Baron Von Volsung, www.rhfweb.com\baron, Email: www.rhfweb.com\emailform.html President Thomas D. Clark, Email: www.rhfweb.com\emailform.html, Personal Web Page: www.rhfweb.com\personal New Age Production's Inc., www.rhfweb.com\newage Star Haven Community Services, at www.rhfweb.com\sh Radiation Health Foundation Trust at www.rhfweb.com -------------------------------1080097942 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In a message dated 3/23/2004 10:18:01 AM Eastern Standard Time, mikec s= nip.net writes:
[Equipment ground "static electricity"] is a c= onfusion of terms. Static
electricity is by definition static, not curren= t, and associated with
insulators, not wet conductive electrolytic cells.= "OU" in electrolytic
cells is associated with heat production, transmuta= tion, and nuclear "ash",
which are not produced by the cited reactions. "= Stray atomspheric electrons"
get thoroughly grounded by the wet conductiv= e environment of electrolytic
cells.
According to Constantin Meyl in his book scalar waves or vortex wave th= eory, static electricity is caused in air (dielectric or insulator) when the= potential counter vortex which is voltage electricity exceeds the= current magnetic vortex energy.  Counter vortex electrical voltage ene= rgy or scalar energy does exist in dielectrics or insulators, since the coun= ter vortex electrical energy to a conductor of the magnetic current vortex i= s an insulator or dielectric.  It is possible that over unity comes fro= m the energy in the counter dielectric vortex voltage electrical energy that= encircles the magnetic current vortex, when the dielectric vortex exceeds t= he current vortex.  This explains why rain water may have more energy i= n it than normal water, since it picks up the scalar wave voltage elect= rons in the air, which are excited by the Graneau discharge invention to cre= ate overunity energy.
 

Baron Von Volsung, www.rhfweb.com\baron, Email: w= ww.rhfweb.com\emailform.html
President Thomas D. Clark,
Email: www.rhfweb.com\emailform.html, Personal Web Page: = www.rhfweb.com\personal
New Age Production's Inc., www.rhfweb.com\n= ewage
Star Haven Community Services, at www.rhfweb.com\sh
Radiation=20= Health Foundation Trust at www.rhfweb.com
-------------------------------1080097942-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 23 21:00:36 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2O50W4s001579; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 21:00:32 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2O50Utk001558; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 21:00:30 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 21:00:30 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.2.20040323210314.082dea80 mail.dlsi.net> X-Sender: stevek mail.dlsi.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9 Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 21:04:31 -0800 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Steve Krivit Subject: Re: Park's brain may fall out! NRL report cont. In-Reply-To: <129.3d61ac5e.2d924d08 aol.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=====================_1130211000==.ALT" Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53671 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: --=====================_1130211000==.ALT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed News at 10 ---Bob Park attends Cold Fusion meeting....fears brain will fall out! At 09:31 PM 3/23/2004 -0500, you wrote: >David Nagel asked Robert Park to keep an open mind. Park replied that he >would but not to the extent that his brain would fall out. > >Frank Znidarsic Thanks, Steve --=====================_1130211000==.ALT Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" News at 10 ---Bob Park attends Cold Fusion meeting....fears brain will fall out!

At 09:31 PM 3/23/2004 -0500, you wrote:
David Nagel asked Robert Park to keep an open mind.  Park replied that he would but not to the extent that his brain would fall out.

Frank Znidarsic

Thanks,

Steve
--=====================_1130211000==.ALT-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Mar 24 06:48:59 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2OEmq4s016697; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 06:48:56 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2OEmoPv016685; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 06:48:50 -0800 Resent-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 06:48:50 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f From: FZNIDARSIC aol.com Message-ID: <9e.68cb33c.2d92f9f8 aol.com> Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 09:49:28 EST Subject: Re: Park's brain may fall out! NRL report cont. To: vortex-l eskimo.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_9e.68cb33c.2d92f9f8_boundary" X-Mailer: 7.0 for Windows sub 10712 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53672 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: --part1_9e.68cb33c.2d92f9f8_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 3/24/04 12:01:35 AM Eastern Standard Time, stevek dlsi.net writes: > News at 10 ---Bob Park attends Cold Fusion meeting....fears brain will fall > out! > > Clarification, Bob Park was not at the NWL meeting. this event happened at a prior meeting. It was presented in Nagels talk. I recorded this. I see if Nagel will allow me to put this comment on my CD and ZPT page. Frank --part1_9e.68cb33c.2d92f9f8_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In a message dated 3/24/04 12:01:35= AM Eastern Standard Time, stevek dlsi.net writes:


News at 10 ---Bob Park attends=20= Cold Fusion meeting....fears brain will fall out!



Clarification,  Bob Park was not at the NWL meeting.  this event h= appened at a prior meeting.  It was presented in Nagels talk.  I r= ecorded this.  I see if Nagel will allow me to put this comment on my C= D and ZPT page.

Frank
--part1_9e.68cb33c.2d92f9f8_boundary-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Mar 24 08:26:14 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2OGQA4s009398; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 08:26:10 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2OGQ7TV009376; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 08:26:07 -0800 Resent-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 08:26:07 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.1.4.030702.0 Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 11:30:16 -0500 Subject: Re: Park's brain may fall out! NRL report cont. From: "Eugene F. Mallove" To: "vortex l eskimo.com" Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <5.2.0.9.2.20040323210314.082dea80 mail.dlsi.net> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="B_3162972616_406947" Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53673 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: > This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. --B_3162972616_406947 Content-type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable On 3/24/04 12:04 AM, "Steve Krivit" wrote: > News at 10 ---Bob Park attends Cold Fusion meeting....fears brain will fa= ll > out! >=20 > At 09:31 PM 3/23/2004 -0500, you wrote: >> David Nagel asked Robert Park to keep an open mind. Park replied that h= e >> would but not to the extent that his brain would fall out. >>=20 >> Frank Znidarsic=20 > Thanks, >=20 > Steve It is quite clear that Park=B9s brain, though still encased in a thick skull, has provably been malfunctioning for many years and is incapable of rationa= l thought on the matter of the basic structure of science. It does not need to fall out. It has done quite enough damage from the place in which it currently resides. Dr. Eugene F. Mallove President, New Energy Foundation, Inc. (A Non-profit, 501(c)(3) Corporation= ) Editor-in-Chief, Infinite Energy Magazine PO Box 2816 Concord, NH 03302-2816 www.infinite-energy.com editor infinite-energy.com 603-485-4700 Fx: 603-485-4710 --B_3162972616_406947 Content-type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Re: Park's brain may fall out!  NRL  report cont. On 3/24/04 12:04 AM, &q= uot;Steve Krivit" <stevek dlsi.net> wrote:

News at 10 ---Bob Park attends Cold Fusion meeting....fears brain will fa= ll out!

At 09:31 PM 3/23/2004 -0500, you wrote:
David Nagel asked Robert Park to keep an open mind.  Park replied th= at he would but not to the extent that his brain would fall out.

Frank Znidarsic

Thanks,

Steve

It is quite clear that Park’s brain, though still encased in a thi= ck skull, has provably been malfunctioning for many years and is incapable o= f rational thought on the matter of the basic structure of science.  It= does not need to fall out. It has done quite enough damage from the place i= n which it  currently resides.

= Dr. Eugene F. Mallove
President, New Energy Foundation, Inc. (A Non-profit, 501(c)(3) Corpor= ation)
Editor-in-Chief, Infinite Energy Magazine
PO Box 2816
Concord, NH 03302-2816        
       www.infinite-energy.com =    editor infinite-energy.com
        603-485-4700  Fx: 603-= 485-4710


  
--B_3162972616_406947-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Mar 24 11:04:49 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2OJ4gMD001394; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 11:04:43 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2OJ4buj001364; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 11:04:37 -0800 Resent-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 11:04:37 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <29370570.1080155078177.JavaMail.root huey.psp.pas.earthlink.net> Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 11:04:38 -0800 (GMT-08:00) From: Randy Souther Reply-To: Randy Souther To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Salt Lake Tribune Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Earthlink Zoo Mail 1.0 Resent-Message-ID: <1hYToC.A.LV.FvdYAB ultra5.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53674 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Re: Park's brain may fall out! =A0NRL =A0report cont.

A nice cold fusion article in the Salt Lake Tribune--interviews with S. = Jones and others:

"Cold Fusion Research Isn't Frozen"

= http://www.sltrib.com/2004/Mar/03232004/tuesday/tuesday.asp

Randy


From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Mar 24 11:48:44 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2OJmTCG013789; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 11:48:30 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2OJmSLN013767; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 11:48:28 -0800 Resent-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 11:48:28 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-Id: <6.0.3.0.2.20040324144604.01cc9be0 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell mindspring.com@pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.3.0 Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 14:48:23 -0500 To: vortex-L eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: RE: Salt Lake Tribune Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53675 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: That is a pretty good article, isn't it? I see that Jones is up to his usually dirty tricks, and Huizenga cannot stop lying through his teeth. I zapped the following message to the reporter: Greetings. You quoted John Huizenga's comment about cold fusion papers: "They can't pass peer-review, that's the problem." That is false. Hundreds of cold fusion papers have passed peer review and have been published, some of them in the world's most distinguished journals of physics and chemistry. Several have appeared in the Japanese Journal of Applied Physics (JJAP), which is the second most often cited journal in the world. The JJAP recently published a paper on a critical cold fusion breakthrough made at Mitsubishi Heavy Industries by Iwamura et al. See: http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/IwamuraYelementalaa.pdf Our web site features a bibliography of over 3,000 papers on cold fusion, alphabetical indices by title and author, and the full text of 300 papers in Acrobat format. See: http://lenr-canr.org/ - Jed Rothwell Librarian LENR-CANR.org From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Mar 24 11:49:44 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2OJnd9t028893; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 11:49:40 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2OJnX2i028866; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 11:49:33 -0800 Resent-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 11:49:33 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <001d01c411d3$d0e42200$8837fea9 cpq> From: "Jones Beene" To: References: <00df01c410cc$c82a3a80$8680b341 computer> Subject: Re: Superoxide Anions and Over-Unity Electrolysis Cells? Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 11:11:30 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ultra6.eskimo.com id i2OJnO9t028801 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53676 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: One more comment on the site that Fred forwarded yesterday. It has significant relevance to chemical overunity in any reaction where water, excess oxygen and electrical current are found to produce an energy anomaly. http://www.astaxanthin.org/oxidation.htm I think that almost everyone on this forum who has a background with some degree of classical physics education, has been conditioned to believe that there is no such thing as chemical OU. Consequently, it is a common belief that if a reaction shows significant OU, then it must of necessity be either LENR, CANR, CF, or hydrino, etc... or measurement error. This may not be the case. Here are some further thoughts on the likelihood that OU is available through chemistry alone, despite the fact that you were taught otherwise in university. It need not employ recourse to ZPE, which is equally controversial to LENR. Personally I believe that chemical OU does involve a Casimir-type geometry - which is arguably ZPE, but that is another issue. The key point is that the appearance of excess heat in many different kinds of experiments may not involve conversion of nuclear mass to energy at all... or even conversion of electron angular momentum into excess energy, but instead may involve a single common denominator. That common denominator is a reaction where a "bare proton" is allowed to stay bare for a long enough time span, and often enough, to attract whatever mass-energy is available from whatever extra-dimensional source. One really need not get more specific about the source of excess energy than that. And if you follow "hot fusion" and this hypothesis is correct, you may have already noticed this irony. If one could provide a loss-free containment structure for protons, eliminating Bremsstrahlung for instance, and using RTSC, then one would not need 'fusion' at all. The power density would be lower, but so what. The bare proton seems to be the key to chemical overunity. It may operate like a 4-space antenna. We also beginning to get a grasp on the threshold numbers which are involved because water itself does have a lot of temporarily bare protons, which are not bare for long enough... until moderately stimulated. This stimulation process often involves the superoxidation of water, which is a bit counter-intuitive, until one looks at superoxidation itself as a kind of pseudo-reduction reaction! It is a kind of pseudo-reduction that competes with hydrogen reduction in any type of complex redox process, in order to keep the proton "bare" for longer. In this context "longer" is measured in billionths or trillionths of a second. I think that I can prove this hypothesis logically in a kind of "thought experiment" .... or Gedankenexperiment, if you prefer, Herr Feynman. But that involves an even longer post, or perhaps its own web page eventually. BTW, R. Feynman's "Brownian Ratchet" was a "perpetual motion" machine, concocted in a Gedankenexperiment, which did not violate the second law. It didn't work, either, but this one could. This KEY concept to chemical OU is a sequentially reversible *chain reaction.* We know for an absolute fact that certain chemical reactions involving oxygen and hydrogen are NOT thermodynamically balanced. Water electrolysis is NOT balanced thermodynamically when reversed, and this has been proven over and over again, but it is not exactly showing up in physics textbooks. Apparently experts like Ed Storms don't believe it, even though the references I have cited in the past are clear and unambiguous. That small bit of excess energy, a fractional eV, would be available from this lack of reversibility but it is normally unusable, just as Brownian motion is unusable, because it is way too miniscule, in and of itself. How does one convert the miniscule into the grand, Dr Graneau (Dr. Big-Water)? Well, just follow the argument in the web-site cited above down to the bottom where a particular generic type of chain reaction is described. Certain superoxidative radicals can work on many substrates, even water, by "stealing" an electron in a chain reaction. Superoxidative radicals can be analogized to gas-electrodes which provide electrolysis in situ. The resulting substrate becomes immediately a radical itself, and can react electrochemically with other non-fuel molecules in a *chain reaction.* Multiply any small gain by 10^20 and it is unusable. But multiply it by 10^23 and you have significant OU. If you provide a superoxidative environment where hydrogen reduction by bare protons is inhibited or delayed by the action of a superoxide, then it may be possible to speed up the threshold for OU from hours or days to 50-100 times per second. Timing is everything. At this geometric scale, where a highly reactive chemically reversibly reaction (superoxidation) can be accomplished in less than a picosecond, one only need provide an extended "opportunity". That means that in any type of sequential conversion process where, say a chemical explosion takes place, then the superoxidative chain reaction, the unbalanced "see-saw" must be enhanced to where the product of its number of iterations times the number of molecules involved exceeds roughly 10^23 per cycle. Sorry, Frank Z, I can't think of how that number can be shoehorned into megahertz-meter but I'm trying to eliminate a few zeros somehow... Jones To wax philosophical, one could opine that in the study of LIFE itself - in all its many nuances, there are three major tenets. These are (in order of importance): 1) Timing is everything 2) Timing is everything 3) Timing is everything Which begs the question: is humor anti-entropic? From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Mar 24 11:55:29 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2OJtJgQ015772; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 11:55:19 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2OJtHqX015757; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 11:55:17 -0800 Resent-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 11:55:17 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-Id: <6.0.3.0.2.20040324144902.01cea498 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell mindspring.com@pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.3.0 Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 14:55:17 -0500 To: vortex-L eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: DoE review of CF Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53677 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Maybe my fears about the DOE review are overblown. Perhaps Peter Hagelstein will be given some role in selecting panel members, or Dresselhaus will be a member and she will be fair-minded. I hope so. It should be remembered that the ERAB panel left the door slightly open to funding for research, but that was only window dressing. In reality, the door slammed shut in many people have cited the ERAB report as the reason. This new report may also include a lukewarm partial recommendation which is also ignored. On the good side, any publicity is good publicity, and I do not see how the panel can make things worse than they are today. - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Mar 24 12:26:00 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2OKPmks004961; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 12:25:49 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2OKPlvK004948; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 12:25:47 -0800 Resent-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 12:25:47 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.1.4.030702.0 Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 15:29:55 -0500 Subject: Re: Park's brain may fall out! NRL report cont. From: "Eugene F. Mallove" To: "David J. Nagel" , Frank Znidarsic , "vortex l eskimo.com" Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4.1.20040324130607.01b9c930 imap.gwu.edu> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="B_3162986997_1300818" Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53678 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: > This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. --B_3162986997_1300818 Content-type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable On 3/24/04 1:09 PM, "David J. Nagel" wrote: Hi Dave, > Hi Gene, >=20 > Frank said yesterday at NRL that he would ask my permission to quote me. = He > did not do that for the note below. >=20 > Well, that is certainly a problem that he has caused. You message to me > appeared on Vortex L, so I am posting my reply there too. >=20 > What Frank wrote is factually wrong on two major counts. It makes Frank.= ..and > me...look like fools. >=20 > Then you must correct the source of the information. >=20 > I have to go to give a class now and do not have to time to write Frank. > Please forward this to him. >=20 > I will. >=20 > How widely did you distribute this counterproductive abomination? >=20 > =B3Counterproductive abomination=B2? Now that is real, real sweet of you , = Dave! > Frankly, I can point to any number of utterances of Park over the past 15 > years -- the =B3rattling corpse=B2 metaphor, etc. -- which are far more wid= ely > distributed that any thing Znidarsic or I say on any of our forums. Alb= eit, > our audiences are generally more intelligent and open-mined that those wh= o > follow Park=B9s rants. Quality, not quantity is the point. >=20 > The Znidarsic remark was made on vortex-l =8B I personally sent my reply to > Znidarsic no further than that (except maybe for Scott Chubb=B9s eyes) =8B at > least for now. I certainly will not, however, propagate any error that > Znidarsic made =8B so please let me know the facts. >=20 > By the way, I stand by the truth of my remark about basic science and Par= k=B9s > mentality being incapable of its appreciation. Do you think otherwise? >=20 > Sincerely, >=20 > Eugene F. Mallove, www.infinite-energy.com >=20 > . > Dave >=20 >=20 > At 11:30 AM 3/24/04 -0500, Eugene F. Mallove wrote: >> On 3/24/04 12:04 AM, "Steve Krivit" wrote: >> News at 10 ---Bob Park attends Cold Fusion meeting....fears brain will f= all >> out! >>=20 >> At 09:31 PM 3/23/2004 -0500, you wrote: David Nagel asked Robert Park to= keep >> an open mind. Park replied that he would but not to the extent that his >> brain would fall out. >>=20 >> Frank Znidarsic=20 >>=20 >> Thanks, >>=20 >> Steve >>=20 >>=20 >> It is quite clear that Park s brain, though still encased in a thick sku= ll, >> has provably been malfunctioning for many years and is incapable of rati= onal >> thought on the matter of the basic structure of science. It does not ne= ed to >> fall out. It has done quite enough damage from the place in which it >> currently resides. >>=20 >> Dr. Eugene F. Mallove >=20 > President, New Energy Foundation, Inc. (A Non-profit, 501(c)(3) Corporati= on) > Editor-in-Chief, Infinite Energy Magazine > PO Box 2816 > Concord, NH 03302-2816 >=20 >> www.infinite-energy.com >> editor infinite-energy.com >> 603-485-4700 Fx: 603-485-4710 >>=20 >>=20 > =20 --B_3162986997_1300818 Content-type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Re: Park's brain may fall out!  NRL  report cont. On 3/24/04 1:09 PM, &qu= ot;David J. Nagel" <nagel gwu.edu> wrote:


Hi Dave,

Hi Gene,

Frank said yesterday at NRL that he would ask my permission to quote me. &n= bsp;He did not do that  for the note below.

 Well, that is certainly a problem that he has caused.  You me= ssage to me appeared on Vortex L, so I am posting my reply there too.

What Frank wrote is factually wrong on two major counts.  It ma= kes Frank...and me...look like fools.

Then you must correct the source of the information.

I have to go to give a class now and do not have to time to write Frank. &n= bsp;Please forward this to him.

I will.

How widely did you distribute this counterproductive abomination?

“Counterproductive abomination”?  Now that is real, re= al sweet of you , Dave!  Frankly, I can point to any number of utteranc= es of Park over the past 15 years  -- the “rattling  corpse&= #8221; metaphor, etc. -- which are far more widely distributed that any thin= g Znidarsic or I say on any of our forums.   Albeit, our audiences= are generally more intelligent and open-mined that those who follow Park= 217;s rants.   Quality, not quantity is the point.

The Znidarsic remark was made on vortex-l — I personally sent my repl= y to Znidarsic no further than that (except maybe for Scott Chubb’s ey= es) — at least for now. I certainly will not, however, propagate any e= rror that Znidarsic made — so please let me know the facts.

By the way, I stand by the truth of my remark about basic science and Park&= #8217;s mentality being incapable of its appreciation. Do you think otherwis= e?

Sincerely,

 Eugene F. Mallove,     www.infinite-energy.com

.
Dave


At 11:30 AM 3/24/04 -0500, Eugene F. Mallove wrote:
On 3/24/04 12:04 AM, "Steve Krivit" <<= U>stevek dlsi.net> wrote:
News at 10 ---Bob Park attends Cold Fusion meeting....fears brain will fall= out!

At 09:31 PM 3/23/2004 -0500, you wrote: David Nagel asked Robert Park to ke= ep an open mind.  Park replied that he would but not to the extent that= his brain would fall out.

Frank Znidarsic

Thanks,

Steve


It is quite clear that Park s brain, though still encased in a thick skull,= has provably been malfunctioning for many years and is incapable of rationa= l thought on the matter of the basic structure of science.  It does not= need to fall out. It has done quite enough damage from the place in which i= t  currently resides.

Dr. Eugene F. Mallove

President, New Energ= y Foundation, Inc. (A Non-profit, 501(c)(3) Corporation)
Editor-in-Chief, Infinite Energy Magazine
PO Box 2816
Concord, NH 03302-2816       

     www.infinite-energy.com <http://www.infinite-ene= rgy.com/>    edito= r infinite-energy.com
        603-485-4700  Fx: 603-= 485-4710


  

--B_3162986997_1300818-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Mar 24 13:08:00 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2OL7nks014528; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 13:07:53 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2OL7fT1014503; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 13:07:41 -0800 Resent-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 13:07:41 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 12:14:26 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: Salt Lake Tribune Resent-Message-ID: <0i6KeB.A.jiD.difYAB ultra6.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53679 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 11:04 AM 3/24/4, Randy Souther wrote: >Re: Park's brain may fall out! NRL report cont. > > >

A nice cold fusion article in the Salt Lake Tribune--interviews with S. >Jones and others:

>

"Cold Fusion Research Isn't Frozen"

>

href="http://www.sltrib.com/2004/Mar/03232004/tuesday/tuesday.asp">http://w >ww.sltrib.com/2004/Mar/03232004/tuesday/tuesday.asp

>

Randy

>
>
Interesting to hear that Jones has a live one in replication in three labs. Also interesting to hear background and some views of Bart Simon, a long time reader and poster on this list. (Still lurking I assume Bart?) It is surprising to hear Bart Simon's opinion that funding is not available for the field because of the notariety brought to the field by Pons and Fleischmann's premature announcement. This is nonsense. There would be no field of cold fusion if it weren't for Fleischmann and Pons. Jones' published work at the time, if I recall correctly, was on muon catalysed fusion, which is not really cold fusion at all, but rather an impractical form of hot fusion. It exhibits the branching ratios and signatures of hot fusion. The main reason there is no funding for cold fusion is there is no reliable experiment that has been replicated reliably as well. Had there been one 15 or 14 years ago there would have been no problem with funding. The problem therefore is not with the premature announcement, but rather with the gate keeping pundits that require experiments that work 100 percent of the time before publication or funding is feasible. The problem is failing to adjust standards according to the importance of the work. There has been a tendency at many levels to treat cold fusion as science as usual. This is irrational. It is not science as usual. It is not even just paradigm shifting science either. It is science the timeliness of which may be critical to our survival. Unlike pure science, the immediacy of the value which can result from research in the field of cold fusion is not in any doubt. Also, given the 15 years of a steadily increasing body of positive results, there should be no doubt at this point that there is in fact new science to be had from effort in the field. Generally speaking, risk benefit analysis does not give scientists a warm and fuzzy feeling if applied to research dollars. That is because the value of pure science often occurs long after the discoveries are made. Further, the information gained through pure science itself has human value. Cold fusion, on the other hand, is not of this genre. The potential it offers may not be even just a benefit, but rather a necessity not obtainable by any other means. In any case, cold fusion science should not be evaluated like ordinary pure science. The anomalous energy release and nuclear transmutation observed in cold fusion experiments, without the side effect of irradiated scientists, gives some basis of hope for a non-polluting, non-greenhouse gas producing solution to energy needs. It provides some hope of avoiding the disaster of economies unable to support the world population. It does not seem to me reasonable to wait for science to march in its lumbering way to a resolution. It certainly should not lumber on with only minescule or highly limited private funding. What is required apparently is a political solution. What is required is a politician with the vision to see that gambling on the only available route to a destination is no gamble at all. Hopefully the gatekeepers will wake up to the fact their shortsightedness and puckered sphincters may be putting the future of their own progeny and those of everyone else at risk. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Mar 24 13:16:52 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2OLGfHq007190; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 13:16:41 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2OLGdSr007175; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 13:16:39 -0800 Resent-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 13:16:39 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-Id: <6.0.3.0.2.20040324160821.01cd0bb0 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell mindspring.com@pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.3.0 Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 16:15:53 -0500 To: vortex-L eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: Re: Park's brain may fall out! NRL report cont. Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53680 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: I do not understand why Dave Nagel is upset about Frank Znidarsic's report. Robert Park and many other and anti-CF propagandists have made that crack about "brains falling out" countless times. Even if Znidarsic's memory played tricks on him, and Nagel did not quote Park saying that, it is no big deal. Park has said much else that is even worse. If Nagel contacts Park today, I am sure Park will be happy to retroactively endorse the statement. He will say it now, even if he did not happen to say it before when Nagel was listening. - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Mar 24 13:56:47 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2OLuSHq021335; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 13:56:29 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2OLuMZY021220; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 13:56:22 -0800 Resent-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 13:56:22 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-Id: <6.0.3.0.2.20040324162302.01cf2690 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell mindspring.com@pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.3.0 Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 16:56:20 -0500 To: vortex-L eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: Re: Salt Lake Tribune Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53681 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Horace Heffner writes: > Interesting to hear that Jones has a live one in replication in three labs. I believe Ed Storms thinks that Jones is observing a conventional nuclear phenomenon. Jones does not believe any of the other evidence for cold fusion reported by other researchers. I believe he claims he is intrigued by Iwamura's transmutations, but I doubt he would go on record saying he believes they are real. He adamantly refuses to believe any excess heat claims. He says he is waiting for calorimetric proof from Scott Little, and in the meanwhile he discounts all other calorimetric evidence from the last 15 years. He gave me several technical reasons for his doubts, but all of his claims were factually incorrect, such as the statement that heat only occurs after long incubation periods and the signal to noise ratio has always been low. Why he thinks Little is much more qualified than, say, McKubre, and has better instruments than McKubre, is a mystery to me. (It is also a mystery to McKubre himself, who was not thrilled to hear about Jones' views.) Jones and I had a lively exchange of letters about this after ICCF-10. I would be happy to share copies with anyone who is interested. it is a little like a time warp; in my opinion, he is not budged one millimeter since 1989. > Jones' published work at the time, if I recall correctly, was on muon > catalysed fusion, which is not really cold fusion at all, but rather an > impractical form of hot fusion. See "Fire from Ice." Jones was working on a "mother earth soup" version of cold fusion. > There has been a tendency at many levels to treat cold fusion as science as > usual. This is irrational. It is not science as usual. It is not even > just paradigm shifting science either. It is science the timeliness of > which may be critical to our survival. I believe the main reason cold fusion has not been treated like ordinary science is because it threatens established research funding, especially in hot fusion, which is already an endangered field with a siege mentality. Of course scientific issues such as lack of theory and the unexpected, unusual nature of the results played a role, but most of the violent rejection has been caused by m-o-n-e-y. I do not think that opposition from established energy industries has played a role. The coal and oil barons are too busy fighting wind power and environmentalists to take any notice of cold fusion. > It does not seem to me reasonable to wait for science to march in its > lumbering way to a resolution. It certainly should not lumber on with only > minescule or highly limited private funding. What is required apparently > is a political solution. What is required is a politician with the vision > to see that gambling on the only available route to a destination is no > gamble at all. What is required is a public demonstration, or least a video showing a public demonstration, or at least a video showing a demonstration experiment that most educated people can understand. Ed Storms and I are working on that. We must convince a large number of people that cold fusion is real. Once we do that, the public will demand action. Ours is still a free society, and the public is still an unstoppable, irresistible force that can push aside the largest corporation and the most powerful lobbyist. The public seldom wields its power, but that power is dormant, not extinguished. Some scientific and technological controversies have dragged on for decades, and some for as long as 700 years, even though they were critical to society and costs thousands of lives. Always, in the end, the public had to step in and enforce action. I am sure that is true for cold fusion as well. I like to quote Samuel Florman on this: Sir Hugh E. C. Beaver, addressing the First International Congress on Air Pollution in 1955, traced the seven-hundred-year-long campaign against air pollution in England. Complaint after complaint, committee after committee, report after report -- all were ineffectual, as the centuries passed, and conditions grew progressively worse. Finally the London Smog of 1952, with its horrendous 4,000 deaths, set the scene for a new investigating committee, which was chaired by Sir Hugh. The committee's report was well received, said Beaver, and led to effective action, not because the report was exceptional in any way, but because the public was, at long last, receptive. The lesson to be learned, according to Beaver, is that "on public opinion, and on it alone, finally rests the issue." - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Mar 24 14:07:57 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2OM7mHq025631; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 14:07:49 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2OM7lVQ025615; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 14:07:47 -0800 Resent-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 14:07:47 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-Id: <2.2.32.20040324220530.00699a08 pop.freeserve.net> X-Sender: grimer2.freeserve.co.uk pop.freeserve.net X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 2.2 (32) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 22:05:30 +0000 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Grimer Subject: Re: Park's brain may fall out! NRL report cont. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ultra5.eskimo.com id i2OM7fHq025569 Resent-Message-ID: <7w9y8.A.HQG.zagYAB ultra5.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53682 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 11:30 am 24-03-04 -0500, you wrote: >On 3/24/04 12:04 AM, "Steve Krivit" wrote: > >> News at 10 ---Bob Park attends Cold Fusion meeting....fears brain will fall >> out! >> >> At 09:31 PM 3/23/2004 -0500, you wrote: >>> David Nagel asked Robert Park to keep an open mind. Park replied that he >>> would but not to the extent that his brain would fall out. >>> >>> Frank Znidarsic >> Thanks, >> >> Steve > >It is quite clear that ParkΉs brain, though still encased in a thick skull, >has provably been malfunctioning for many years and is incapable of rational >thought on the matter of the basic structure of science. It does not need >to fall out. It has done quite enough damage from the place in which it >currently resides. ROTFL FG From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Mar 24 14:45:13 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2OMj7ks010407; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 14:45:07 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2OMj4Io010371; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 14:45:04 -0800 Resent-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 14:45:04 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.2.20040324144841.0d3ce140 mail.dlsi.net> X-Sender: stevek mail.dlsi.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9 Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 14:49:18 -0800 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Steve Krivit Subject: Re: Park's brain may fall out! NRL report cont. In-Reply-To: <6.0.3.0.2.20040324160821.01cd0bb0 pop.mindspring.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=====================_1194094218==.ALT" Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53683 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: --=====================_1194094218==.ALT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Vortex: I present for your entertainment, disgust and horror an excerpt from our recently completed project, "The 2004 Cold Fusion Report." More information is available at www.newenergytimes.com . Nevertheless, it has been challenging for cold fusion researchers to obtain the participation of scientists within the nuclear physics community to scrutinize their work. "The problem," Storms said in a telephone conversation in November 2003, "is to find a person who is respected by conventional science, who will take the time to learn what is known, and then discuss this with objectivity. Most mainstream scientists are woefully ignorant of the field because they do not take the time to study a subject they either believe--or have been told--is nonsense."51 For example, several cold fusion scientists, including McKubre and Storms, recount rejected attempts to hand-deliver scientific papers to Dr. Robert Park, the director of public information for the American Physical Society. And MIT physics professor Herman Feshbach once astonishingly remarked, "I've had 50 years of experience in nuclear physics, and I know what is possible and what is not. I'm not going to read it. It's all junk."52 The investigation behind "The 2004 Cold Fusion Report" included interviews with nearly every prominent critic. None had any knowledge of the current status of cold fusion, although a few ventured a critique based on outdated information. Walter Gratzer, professor of chemistry at the University of London and author of a 2000 book in which cold fusion is criticized, The Undergrowth of Science: Delusion, Self-Deception, and Human Frailty,53 said in a November 2003 e-mail, "I gave cold fusion as an example of what has been called 'pathological science.' I have to say that it is not my field ... What I wrote in the book was based on my reading at the time, which convinced me that the cold fusion uproar was based on atrociously bad science by people stampeded into hasty experiments and premature publication ... but I do not think it is for outsiders like myself to pronounce judgments ... I think you should consult genuine experts on nuclear reactions."54 He offered as "big names" Nathan Lewis, Steven Koonin, Alan Bard, Richard Garwin, William Happer, Jacob Bigeleisen at State University of New York, Stony Brook, Frank Close (Exeter College, Oxford and the Atomic Energy Laboratory at Harwell), and David Williams, formerly at Harwell.55 In a November 2003 telephone conversation, Robert Park said, "This sort of dwindling band of true believers, each year they get together and talk about the wonderful progress that's been made, and none of the rest of us can ever see that." When asked about the allegations that he has refused to read cold fusion papers, he commented, "I read them till I was sick of them. There's a lot of paranoia in that group." Asked what papers he could point to that discussed current claims in cold fusion, Park said, "Golly, I haven't gone through that in so long. I don't know offhand what to recommend." When asked specifically if he was aware of any papers written within the last five or 10 years," he replied, "Nothing, really." Park recommended speaking with "the experts:" Steven Koonin and Nathan Lewis.56 Koonin, in a January 2004 e-mail, wrote, "I don't know of any recent events that would cause me to look hard at this business again."57 In January 2004, Lewis e-mailed a reply about progress in cold fusion, "I've been out of that area for a decade or so. Consequently, I have no basis for commenting on anything that has happened in that period of time science-wise."58 Happer, a theoretical physicist with the Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, wrote in a January 2004 e-mail exchange, "I do follow these activities with interest [and] there continue to be papers published and claims made. None that I have seen look credible." When asked to mention a few of the papers he has seen, he deflected the question: "Well, if you want the complete archive from a 'true believer,' you might want to contact Bob Bass [Rhodes Scholar and theoretical physicist formerly with the Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory]." Asked again to identify a paper, Happer said, "I am still looking around."59 Dr. Frank Close, author of the 1991 book Too Hot to Handle: The Race for Cold Fusion,60 and Dr. David Williams, who led Harwell's team on its Fleischmann-Pons replication study, each said of the past decade in cold fusion research that they had heard nothing of substance. Close elaborated, "No one in mainstream science is putting serious research time into this ... When someone produces hard evidence, then I'll get interested. But I've been saying that for 15 years now."61-62 When asked for his definition of "hard evidence" he offered "evidence that is reproducible and under varied conditions... performed rigorously."63 Steve Krivit --=====================_1194094218==.ALT Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Vortex:  I present for your entertainment, disgust and horror an excerpt from our recently completed project,
"The 2004 Cold Fusion Report." More information is available at  www.newenergytimes.com .


Nevertheless, it has been challenging for cold fusion researchers to obtain= the participation of scientists within the nuclear physics community to= scrutinize their work. "The problem," Storms said in a telephone= conversation in November 2003, "is to find a person who is respected= by conventional science, who will take the time to learn what is known, and= then discuss this with objectivity.  Most mainstream scientists are= woefully ignorant of the field because they do not take the time to study a= subject they either believe--or have been told--is= nonsense."51

For example, several cold fusion scientists, including McKubre and= Storms, recount rejected attempts to hand-deliver scientific papers to Dr.= Robert Park, the director of public information for the American Physical= Society. And MIT physics professor Herman Feshbach once astonishingly= remarked, "I've had 50 years of experience in nuclear physics, and I= know what is possible and what is not. I'm not going to read it. It's all= junk."52

The investigation behind "The 2004 Cold Fusion Report"= included interviews with nearly every prominent critic. None had any= knowledge of the current status of cold fusion, although a few ventured a= critique based on outdated information.
 
Walter Gratzer, professor of chemistry at the University of London and= author of a 2000 book in which cold fusion is criticized, The= Undergrowth of Science: Delusion, Self-Deception, and Human= Frailty,53 said in a November 2003 e-mail, "I gave cold= fusion as an example of what has been called 'pathological science.' = I have to say that it is not my field ... What I wrote in the book was= based on my reading at the time, which convinced me that the cold fusion= uproar was based on atrociously bad science by people stampeded into hasty= experiments and premature publication ... but I do not think it is for= outsiders like myself to pronounce judgments ... I think you should consult= genuine experts on nuclear reactions."54  He offered= as "big names" Nathan Lewis, Steven Koonin, Alan Bard, Richard= Garwin, William Happer, Jacob Bigeleisen at State University of New York,= Stony Brook, Frank Close (Exeter College, Oxford and the Atomic Energy= Laboratory at Harwell), and David Williams, formerly at= Harwell.55
 
In a November 2003 telephone conversation, Robert Park said, "This sort= of dwindling band of true believers, each year they get together and talk= about the wonderful progress that's been made, and none of the rest of us= can ever see that." When asked about the allegations that he has= refused to read cold fusion papers, he commented, "I read them till I= was sick of them. There's a lot of paranoia in that group." Asked what= papers he could point to that discussed current claims in cold fusion, Park= said, "Golly, I haven't gone through that in so long. I don't know= offhand what to recommend." When asked specifically if he was aware of= any papers written within the last five or 10 years," he replied,= "Nothing, really." Park recommended speaking with "the= experts:" Steven Koonin and Nathan Lewis.56
Koonin, in a January 2004 e-mail, wrote, "I don't know of any= recent events that would cause me to look hard at this business= again."57 In January 2004, Lewis e-mailed a reply about= progress in cold fusion, "I've been out of that area for a decade or= so. Consequently, I have no basis for commenting on anything that has= happened in that period of time science-wise."58

Happer, a theoretical physicist with the Princeton Plasma Physics= Laboratory, wrote in a January 2004 e-mail exchange, "I do follow= these activities with interest [and] there continue to be papers published= and claims made. None that I have seen look credible."  When= asked to mention a few of the papers he has seen, he deflected the= question: "Well, if you want the complete archive from a 'true= believer,' you might want to contact Bob Bass [Rhodes Scholar and= theoretical physicist formerly with the Princeton Plasma Physics= Laboratory]." Asked again to identify a paper, Happer said, "I am= still looking around."59
 
Dr. Frank Close, author of the 1991 book Too Hot to Handle: The Race for= Cold Fusion,60 and Dr. David Williams, who led Harwell's= team on its Fleischmann-Pons replication study, each said of the past= decade in cold fusion research that they had heard nothing of substance.= Close elaborated, "No one in mainstream science is putting serious= research time into this ... When someone produces hard evidence, then I'll= get interested. But I've been saying that for 15 years= now."61-62 When asked for his definition of "hard= evidence" he offered "evidence that is reproducible and under= varied conditions... performed rigorously."63

Steve Krivit --=====================_1194094218==.ALT-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Mar 24 15:17:28 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2ONHFHq011895; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 15:17:20 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2ONHCHS011879; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 15:17:12 -0800 Resent-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 15:17:12 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f From: FZNIDARSIC aol.com Message-ID: <7b.25486be5.2d9370ea aol.com> Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 18:16:58 EST Subject: Re: Park's brain may fall out! NRL report cont. To: editor infinite-energy.com, vortex-l@eskimo.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_7b.25486be5.2d9370ea_boundary" X-Mailer: 7.0 for Windows sub 10712 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53684 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: --part1_7b.25486be5.2d9370ea_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 3/24/04 3:26:35 PM Eastern Standard Time, editor infinite-energy.com writes: > Hi Gene, > > Frank said yesterday at NRL that he would ask my permission to quote me. He > did not do that for the note below. > I don't know what the problem is. I asked permission to use an audio clip. I did not ask permission to reference his talk. He lecture was in a public forum. What you say in an open forum is public knowledge, is it not. I will not ask to use any of his audio. Anyway we are at a disadvantage already. Let's stop with the infighting. Frank Znidarsic --part1_7b.25486be5.2d9370ea_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In a message dated 3/24/04 3:26:35=20= PM Eastern Standard Time, editor infinite-energy.com writes:


Hi Gene,

Frank said yesterday at NRL that he would ask my permission to quote me.&nbs= p; He did not do that  for the note below.


I don't know what the problem is.    I asked permission to us= e an audio clip.  I did not ask permission to reference his talk. He le= cture was in a public forum.   What you say in an open forum is pu= blic knowledge, is it not.   I will not ask to use any of his audi= o.

Anyway we are at a disadvantage already.  Let's stop with the infightin= g.

Frank Znidarsic
--part1_7b.25486be5.2d9370ea_boundary-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Mar 24 15:25:54 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2ONPnks021883; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 15:25:49 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2ONPmJt021870; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 15:25:48 -0800 Resent-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 15:25:48 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-Id: <6.0.3.0.2.20040324180721.01cedff8 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell mindspring.com@pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.3.0 Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 18:26:29 -0500 To: vortex-L eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: Re: Park's brain may fall out! NRL report cont. Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <9s7HlD.A.qVF.8jhYAB ultra6.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53685 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Steve Krivit writes: "For example, several cold fusion scientists, including McKubre and Storms, recount rejected attempts to hand-deliver scientific papers to Dr. Robert Park, the director of public information for the American Physical Society." Indeed. I distinctly remember the time when I tried to hand him a paper by McKubre, during an APS conference. He let the paper fall to the floor. Not only does he refuse to read these papers, he literally refuses to touch them! Krivit asked some of his "skeptical" respondents to list the authors of papers they have read. None of them could come up with a single name. When I have spoken to them in the past, I discovered that they have *never heard of* McKubre, Storms, Iwamura or any of the other well-known researchers, and furthermore they have no idea what instrument types and techniques are employed in these experiments. That is to say, they are not aware that flow calorimeters or on-line mass spectroscopy has been used. It is not as if they skimmed the papers and forgotten the particulars. They never bothered to read a single paper published after the spring of 1989. Or if they read anything, they have extraordinarily bad memories for researchers. The best way to get these people to shut up once and for all is to tell them 300 papers are available online at LENR-CANR.org, and that 480,000 copies have circulated. They will not read these papers -- they will *never* read them -- but in my experience, when they hear about this they realize they are holding a weak hand, and they often shut up and crawl back under their rocks. Before LENR-CANR.org was established, when I contacted skeptics they often responded by saying, "Where's the proof! Show me the proof!" Now they do not respond at all. That is the best outcome we can hope for. - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Mar 24 15:42:34 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2ONgNHq018043; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 15:42:24 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2ONgMek018030; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 15:42:22 -0800 Resent-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 15:42:22 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.1.4.030702.0 Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 18:45:51 -0500 Subject: Re: Park's brain may fall out! NRL report cont. From: "Eugene F. Mallove" To: "vortex l eskimo.com" Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <5.2.0.9.2.20040324144841.0d3ce140 mail.dlsi.net> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="B_3162998752_1991695" Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53686 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: > This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. --B_3162998752_1991695 Content-type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable On 3/24/04 5:49 PM, "Steve Krivit" wrote: > Vortex: I present for your entertainment, disgust and horror an excerpt = from > our recently completed project, > "The 2004 Cold Fusion Report." More information is available at > www.newenergytimes.com . >=20 >=20 > Nevertheless, it has been challenging for cold fusion researchers to obta= in > the participation of scientists within the nuclear physics community to > scrutinize their work. Steve=B9s capsule assessment is right on target =8B the examples he has gathere= d are fine =8B they are wonderful. The latest pronouncements are so familiar to those of us who have interacted directly or indirectly with these mental midgets ( an evil people) =AD Park, Lewis, Happer, Garwin, Koonin, Huizenga, Close, Graetzer -- for so long. The bottom line is this: all these people are consumed by either arrogance, fear, or a mixture of the two. The fear comes from a realization =8B at som= e level =8B that this cold fusion/LENR =B3noise=B2 is NOT going away; it is not dwindling as they had all predicted. It is, in fact, growing louder. And now, horror or horrors =8B the DoE is actually going to investigate it AGAIN! Think of all the energy they will now have to expend (in dirty tricks and i= n writing fantasy reports), they think, in trying to put it down again! That is where their arrogance and fear comes from: they arrogantly assume that =B3of course it can=B9t be true and we can debunk every point,=B2 but they fear the huge effort they will have to make in concocting scenarios to explain i= t all away. More than that, they now know damn well that the press is going t= o dig into this and that the =B3noise=B2 will in some sense continue for as long as the DoE investigation is on-going. (That is what MIT hot fusion lab director Ron Parker was thinking and fearing when he gave that damning interview to Nick Tate of the Boston Herald in late April 1989 =8B the first use of the F-word -- =B3fraud=B2 against P&F. He told Tate that he was sick of the =B3cheerleading=B2 that the Boston Globe was doing for cold fusion. Read th= e interview with Parker and Ballinger in the posted 55-page report on cold fusion and MIT at www.infinite-energy.com) For that reason I hope the DoE takes its time. I=B9d be very happy if no report came out until January 2005= . This would really hurt the pseudoskeptics very badly. It would allow positive =8B and negative =8Bspeculation to continue for quite a while, no matter what the report formally said eventually. Of course, if the DoE renders a very positive report in short order, that would be better! The human drama that will play out over the coming weeks and months will be both delicious and revolting to watch. The scenario we are faced with is something like the Biblical drama of the Egyptians chasing the fleeing Israelites across the parted Red Sea. The mighty chariots and warriors hav= e no fear that they can vanquish the rag tag band of ex-slaves as they charge after them across the muddy marshes. Little do they know however that they, the taskmasters, will be drowned by torrents of truth as the sea closes in on them and the ex-slaves make it =8Beventually =8B to the Promised Land. - Gene Mallove Dr. Eugene F. Mallove President, New Energy Foundation, Inc. (A Non-profit, 501(c)(3) Corporation= ) Editor-in-Chief, Infinite Energy Magazine PO Box 2816 Concord, NH 03302-2816 www.infinite-energy.com editor infinite-energy.com 603-485-4700 Fx: 603-485-4710 --B_3162998752_1991695 Content-type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Re: Park's brain may fall out!  NRL  report cont. On 3/24/04 5:49 PM, &qu= ot;Steve Krivit" <stevek dlsi.net> wrote:

Vortex:  I present for your entertainment, disgust and horror an exc= erpt from our recently completed project,
"The 2004 Cold Fusion Report." More information is available at w= ww.newenergytimes.com <http://www.newenergytimes.com/> .


Nevertheless, it has been challenging for cold fusion researchers to obtain= the participation of scientists within the nuclear physics community to scr= utinize their work.

Steve’s capsule assessment is right on target — the examples he= has gathered are fine — they are wonderful. The latest pronouncements= are so familiar to those of us who have interacted directly or indirectly w= ith these mental midgets ( an evil people) – Park, Lewis, Happer, Garw= in, Koonin, Huizenga, Close, Graetzer -- for so long.

The bottom line is this: all these people are consumed by either arrogance,= fear, or a mixture of the two.  The fear comes from a realization &nbs= p;— at some level — that this cold fusion/LENR “noise̶= 1; is NOT  going  away; it is not dwindling as they had all predic= ted.  It is, in fact, growing louder. And now, horror or horrors —= ; the DoE is actually going to investigate it AGAIN!  Think of all the = energy they will now have to expend (in dirty tricks and in writing fantasy = reports), they think, in trying to put it down again!  That is where th= eir arrogance and fear comes from: they arrogantly assume that “of cou= rse it can’t be true and we can debunk every point,” but they fe= ar the huge effort they will have to make in concocting scenarios to explain= it all away. More than that, they now know damn well that the press is goin= g to dig into this and that the “noise” will in some sense conti= nue for as long as the DoE investigation is on-going.  (That is what MI= T hot fusion lab director Ron Parker was thinking and fearing when he gave t= hat damning interview to Nick Tate of the Boston Herald in late April 1989 &= #8212; the first use of the F-word -- “fraud” against P&F. H= e told Tate that he was sick of the “cheerleading” that the Bost= on Globe was doing for cold fusion. Read the interview with Parker and Balli= nger in the posted 55-page report on cold fusion and MIT at www.infinite-ene= rgy.com) For that reason I hope the DoE takes its time. I’d be very ha= ppy if no report  came out until January 2005. This would really hurt t= he pseudoskeptics very badly. It would allow positive — and negative &= #8212;speculation to continue for quite a while, no matter what the report f= ormally said eventually. Of course, if the DoE renders a very positive repor= t in short order, that would be better!

The human drama that will play out over the coming weeks and months will be= both delicious and revolting to watch.  The scenario we are faced with= is something like the Biblical drama of the Egyptians chasing the fleeing I= sraelites across the parted Red Sea.  The mighty chariots and warriors = have no fear that they can vanquish the rag tag band of ex-slaves as they ch= arge after them across the muddy marshes. Little do they know however that t= hey, the taskmasters, will be drowned by  torrents of truth as the sea = closes in on them and the ex-slaves make it —eventually — to the= Promised Land.

 - Gene Mallove

Dr. Eug= ene F. Mallove
President, New Energy Foundation, Inc. (A Non-profit, 501(c)(3) Corporation= )
Editor-in-Chief, Infinite Energy Magazine
PO Box 2816
Concord, NH 03302-2816        
        www.infinite-energy.com &nb= sp;  editor infinite-energy.com
        603-485-4700  Fx: 603-= 485-4710
--B_3162998752_1991695-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Mar 24 22:43:35 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2P6hNbB018950; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 22:43:23 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2P6hCFO018905; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 22:43:12 -0800 Resent-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 22:43:12 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 21:49:14 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: Salt Lake Tribune Resent-Message-ID: <254gDC.A.VnE._9nYAB ultra5.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53687 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 4:56 PM 3/24/4, Jed Rothwell wrote: > > Jones' published work at the time, if I recall correctly, was on muon > > catalysed fusion, which is not really cold fusion at all, but rather an > > impractical form of hot fusion. > >See "Fire from Ice." Jones was working on a "mother earth soup" version of >cold fusion. Yes, but his (as of 3/23/89) unpublished research along the "mother earth soup lines" was based on counting neutrons, and his methods of counting found questionable by other experts. It does not seem to me likely that his work would have made a significant impact on the scientific community without Pons and Fleischmann's announcement. It may not have even been published. Besides, to focus on neutrons is to miss the main effect, heat without the radiation signature. [snip] >I believe the main reason cold fusion has not been treated like ordinary >science is because it threatens established research funding, especially in >hot fusion, which is already an endangered field with a siege mentality. Of >course scientific issues such as lack of theory and the unexpected, unusual >nature of the results played a role, but most of the violent rejection has >been caused by m-o-n-e-y. Yes, so true, and it may even have been true that a lot of money thrown at cold fusion in 1989 could have been wasted. There was indeed some justification for holding off on funding I think, though no justification for scientists closing their minds. Now, 15 years and a day later, there seems to be an overwhelming abundance of evidence to justify funding. The body of evidence stands and should stand on its own. A competition for money is justified, and some reasonable percent of the energy research budget, or at least fusion research, should go to low energy nuclear reaction research. > >I do not think that opposition from established energy industries has >played a role. The coal and oil barons are too busy fighting wind power and >environmentalists to take any notice of cold fusion. Yes so true, and renewables are getting the short end of that battle these days. CF is going unnoticed, but it will probably get its turn for unwanted attention. >What is required is a public demonstration, or least a video showing a >public demonstration, or at least a video showing a demonstration >experiment that most educated people can understand. Ed Storms and I are >working on that. We must convince a large number of people that cold fusion >is real. Once we do that, the public will demand action. I would be surprised in the extreme if cold fusion became a significant public issue. It is simply not an election buster. It is too controversial and complex a topic. It doesn't need to be an election buster though. The only thing needed is a little common sense from the right people in the administration or Congress, or in Parliament. I do understand that politics runs on money and not common sense, but every now and then common sense prevails in some compromised form. Perhaps I'm too short sighted, but seems to me that the best that can be hoped for is an educated press. However, who can say for sure? I can't. One thing on the horizon that might make the public actually take notice is $4.00 a gallon gasoline. However, there cannot be any doubt that one of the best things to happen for the CF field is LENR-CANR.org. Getting the evidence out there is having an effect. For your success with LENR-CANR.org I say Bravo! Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Mar 24 23:36:45 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2P7ade5001355; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 23:36:39 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2P7aWSx001334; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 23:36:32 -0800 Resent-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 23:36:32 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.2.20040324233911.00ab21f0 mail.dlsi.net> X-Sender: stevek mail.dlsi.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9 Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 23:39:29 -0800 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Steve Krivit Subject: N.Y.TIMES REPORTS: D.O.E. TO RECONSIDER COLD FUSION Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=====================_1225904281==.ALT" Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53688 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: --=====================_1225904281==.ALT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE MARCH 25, 2004 CONTACT: Steven Krivit (310) 721-5919 (Cell) (310) 470-8189 (Office) THE NEW YORK TIMES REPORTS: NEW U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY REVIEW TAKES COLD FUSION TO BRINK OF ACCEPTANCE "THE 2004 COLD FUSION REPORT" PROVIDED BACKGROUND INFORMATION TO NEW YORK TIMES REPORTER KENNETH CHANG FOR STORY RESEARCH LOS ANGELES, March 25, 2004 -- Investigators Steven Krivit and Nadine Winocur have released the most current work on the history and progress of the science. "The 2004 Cold Fusion Report," the outcome of a four-year investigation, establishes the veracity of cold fusion. The Department of Energy committed to a second review after meeting on Nov. 6, 2003 with several scientists who requested an evaluation of progress in the field of cold fusion. Dr. James F. Decker, deputy director of the science office in the Energy Department, was quoted by The New York Times on March 25, 2004 as saying, "The scientists who came to me are from excellent institutions and have excellent credentials." The scientists reported that cold fusion is real, with results that are robust, verifiable and reproducible. The Energy Department review is expected to decide whether government funding should be applied toward cold fusion research. "For advocates of cold fusion, the new review brings them to the cusp of vindication after years of dismissive ridicule," the New York Times said. "The 2004 Cold Fusion Report" is based on personal communication with more than 50 scientists from around the world, 28 of whom Krivit interviewed on camera at the 10th International Conference on Cold Fusion in Cambridge, Mass. The 53-page report includes quotes from such scientists as Dr. Melvin Miles, former senior electrochemist of the Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division at China Lake, Calif., who, commenting on an eight-year series of U.S. Navy cold fusion experiments, concluded, "In our opinion, these [findings] provide compelling evidence that the [cold fusion effects] are real. This research area has the potential to provide the human race with a nearly unlimited new source of energy. It is possible that [cold fusion] will prove to be one of the most important scientific discoveries of this century." It also cites a senior member of the technical staff at the U.S. government's Sandia National Laboratories, James Corey, who expressed at the September 2003 Energetic Materials Intelligence Symposium that "an overdue revolution in science will arrive, [and] the reputations of cold fusion scientists and those who revile them may be reversed." Although 3,000 scientific papers have been written about cold fusion, progress is underreported in the scientific and popular media because of a rift between cold fusion researchers and the scientific establishment, which has refused in its journals to publish articles relating to cold fusion. In a September 2003 article, science columnist Sharon Begley of the Wall Street Journal noted of this phenomenon, "the only thing pathological about cold fusion is the way the scientific establishment has treated it." "The 2004 Cold Fusion Report" includes the following findings: o Demographic data showing that more than 150 scientists worldwide, including 60 physicists, hold that cold fusion is a verifiable, reproducible low-temperature nuclear reaction, free of harmful radiation and nuclear waste. o Survey results documenting that the effect is reproducible and has been demonstrated in many laboratories around the world, through a variety of methods. o Citations from five scientific papers which report correlation between excess energy and the nuclear by-product helium-4, a key finding which verifies the claims of low- temperature nuclear reactions. Historically, critics of cold fusion erroneously assumed that "cold fusion" should emit the same nuclear products as "hot fusion." Later research demonstrated that the hunt for the "missing neutrons" was misdirected and that the dominant product of cold fusion, instead, is helium-4. "The 2004 Cold Fusion Report" also includes evidence of the veracity of cold fusion in several previously unreleased documents: o A 1993 report to the Pentagon by former JASONS chairman Richard Garwin and by chemistry professor Nathan Lewis of Caltech that supports the findings of "excess heat," providing key evidence for the cold fusion effect. Four years earlier, Lewis tried unsuccessfully to replicate the cold fusion effect and subsequently became one of the most outspoken critics of cold fusion. o A 1991 report by chemistry professor Alan Bard of the University of Texas, a vocal critic of cold fusion who confirmed the presence of "excess heat" in an independent laboratory experiment at SRI International. o Two 1995 papers by scientists from Amoco Production Co. and Shell Research reporting positive, unambiguous evidence from their own cold fusion experiments. Part 1 of "The 2004 Cold Fusion Report" examines factors that led the scientific community to a premature rejection of the validity of cold fusion and explains why developments in cold fusion have gone virtually unreported. It reviews studies revealing that the early experiments conducted by prominent laboratories that were presumed to have debunked cold fusion were in fact seriously flawed. Part 2 of the report discusses the current status of cold fusion research. It reviews advances over the past 15 years and identifies the major unanswered questions. The report concludes with a glimpse of possible future applications for cold fusion technology. "The 2004 Cold Fusion Report" was reviewed for technical accuracy by two physicists with decades of experience in conventional fusion, one of whom has studied cold fusion, as well. The other, a skeptical plasma physicist who works for a major U.S. fusion research center, described the report as "correct, readable, even and unbiased, suitable for reaching physicists and educated people." "The 2004 Cold Fusion Report" has garnered the following praise: "This is very interesting for me, in part because of my continuing interest in neglected science, and in part because I knew Fleischmann & Pons. Several things in the report were new to me and look very promising indeed." - Dr. Henry H. Bauer, Editor-in-Chief, Journal of Scientific Exploration "This is a fine report. It is a work well done, the old-fashioned way, with hard work. I hope the world reads it -- it is well-written and powerful. I hope the world acts on it -- it is clear, concise and concrete." - Dr. Michael Staker, materials scientist and research engineer, U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Grounds "'The 2004 Cold Fusion Report' has brought a wide variety of interesting and complex material together. It should be helpful for someone trying to understand what the arguing has been about." - Dr. Michael Melich, senior research professor at the U.S. Naval Postgraduate School and former branch head of the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory Pullquotes and art are available on request. For a copy of "The 2004 Cold Fusion Report," e-mail your request with full contact information to New Energy Times at press@newenergytimes.com . Steven Krivit Nadine Winocur (310) 721-5919 (Cell) (310) 470-8189 (Office) steven@newenergytimes.com http://www.newenergytimes.com --=====================_1225904281==.ALT Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
MARCH 25, 2004

CONTACT: Steven Krivit
(310) 721-5919 (Cell)
(310) 470-8189 (Office)


THE NEW YORK TIMES REPORTS: NEW U.S.
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY REVIEW TAKES 
COLD  FUSION  TO  BRINK  OF  ACCEPTANCE

"THE 2004 COLD FUSION REPORT" PROVIDED BACKGROUND INFORMATION
TO NEW YORK TIMES REPORTER KENNETH CHANG FOR STORY RESEARCH


LOS ANGELES, March 25, 2004 -- Investigators Steven Krivit and Nadine Winocur have released the most current work on the history and progress of the science. "The 2004 Cold Fusion Report," the outcome of a four-year investigation, establishes the veracity of cold fusion. 

The Department of Energy committed to a second review after meeting on Nov. 6, 2003 with several scientists who requested an evaluation of progress in the field of cold fusion. Dr. James F. Decker, deputy director of the science office in the Energy Department, was quoted by The New York Times on March 25, 2004 as saying, "The scientists who came to me are from excellent institutions and have excellent credentials." The scientists reported that cold fusion is real, with results that are robust, verifiable and reproducible.

The Energy Department review is expected to decide whether government funding should be applied toward cold fusion research. "For advocates of cold fusion, the new review brings them to the cusp of vindication after years of dismissive ridicule," the New York Times said.

"The 2004 Cold Fusion Report" is based on personal communication with more than 50 scientists from around the world, 28 of whom Krivit interviewed on camera at the 10th International Conference on Cold Fusion in Cambridge, Mass.

The 53-page report includes quotes from such scientists as Dr. Melvin Miles, former senior electrochemist of the Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division at China Lake, Calif., who, commenting on an eight-year series of U.S. Navy cold fusion experiments, concluded, "In our opinion, these [findings] provide compelling evidence that the [cold fusion effects] are real. This research area has the potential to provide the human race with a nearly unlimited new source of energy. It is possible that [cold fusion] will prove to be one of the most important scientific discoveries of this century."

It also cites a senior member of the technical staff at the U.S. government's Sandia National Laboratories, James Corey, who expressed at the September 2003 Energetic Materials Intelligence Symposium that "an overdue revolution in science will arrive, [and] the reputations of cold fusion scientists and those who revile them may be reversed."

Although 3,000 scientific papers have been written about cold fusion, progress is underreported in the scientific and popular media because of a rift between cold fusion researchers and the scientific establishment, which has refused in its journals to publish articles relating to cold fusion.

In a September 2003 article, science columnist Sharon Begley of the Wall Street Journal noted of this phenomenon, "the only thing pathological about cold fusion is the way the scientific establishment has treated it."

"The 2004 Cold Fusion Report" includes the following findings:

        o       Demographic data showing that more than 150 scientists worldwide, including 60
                physicists, hold that cold fusion is a verifiable, reproducible low-temperature
                nuclear reaction, free of harmful radiation and nuclear waste.

        o       Survey results documenting that the effect is reproducible and has been
                demonstrated in many laboratories around the world, through a variety of methods.

             Citations from five scientific papers which report correlation between excess energy
                and the nuclear by-product helium-4, a key finding which verifies the claims of low-
                temperature nuclear reactions. Historically, critics of cold fusion erroneously
                assumed that "cold fusion" should emit the same nuclear products as "hot fusion."
                Later research demonstrated that the hunt for the "missing neutrons" was
                misdirected and that the dominant product of cold fusion, instead, is helium-4.

"The 2004 Cold Fusion Report" also includes evidence of the veracity of cold fusion in several previously unreleased documents:

        o       A 1993 report to the Pentagon by former JASONS chairman Richard Garwin and by
                chemistry professor Nathan Lewis of Caltech that supports the findings of "excess
                heat," providing key evidence for the cold fusion effect. Four years earlier, Lewis
                tried unsuccessfully to replicate the cold fusion effect and subsequently became one
                of the most outspoken critics of cold fusion.

        o       A 1991 report by chemistry professor Alan Bard of the University of Texas,
                a vocal critic of cold fusion who confirmed the presence of "excess heat"
                in an independent laboratory experiment at SRI International.

        o       Two 1995 papers by scientists from Amoco Production Co. and Shell Research
                reporting positive, unambiguous evidence from their own cold fusion experiments.

Part 1 of "The 2004 Cold Fusion Report" examines factors that led the scientific community to a premature rejection of the validity of cold fusion and explains why developments in cold fusion have gone virtually unreported. It reviews studies revealing that the early experiments conducted by prominent laboratories that were presumed to have debunked cold fusion were in fact seriously flawed.

Part 2 of the report discusses the current status of cold fusion research. It reviews advances over the past 15 years and identifies the major unanswered questions. The report concludes with a glimpse of possible future applications for cold fusion technology.

"The 2004 Cold Fusion Report" was reviewed for technical accuracy by two physicists with decades of experience in conventional fusion, one of whom has studied cold fusion, as well. The other, a skeptical plasma physicist who works for a major U.S. fusion research center, described the report as "correct, readable, even and unbiased, suitable for reaching physicists and educated people." 

"The 2004 Cold Fusion Report" has garnered the following praise:

"This is very interesting for me, in part because of my continuing interest in neglected science, and in part because I knew Fleischmann & Pons. Several things in the report were new to me and look very promising indeed."
- Dr. Henry H. Bauer, Editor-in-Chief, Journal of Scientific Exploration

"This is a fine report. It is a work well done, the old-fashioned way, with hard work.
I hope the world reads it -- it is well-written and powerful.
I hope the world acts on it -- it is clear, concise and concrete."
- Dr. Michael Staker, materials scientist and research engineer, U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Grounds

"'The 2004 Cold Fusion Report' has brought a wide variety of interesting and complex material together. It should be helpful for someone trying to understand what the arguing has been about."
- Dr. Michael Melich, senior research professor at the U.S. Naval Postgraduate School and former branch head of the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory 

Pullquotes and art are available on request. For a copy of "The 2004 Cold Fusion Report," e-mail your request with full contact information to New Energy Times at press@newenergytimes.com .

Steven Krivit
Nadine Winocur
(310) 721-5919 (Cell)
(310) 470-8189 (Office)
steven@newenergytimes.com
http://www.newenergytimes.com
--=====================_1225904281==.ALT-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Mar 25 00:37:38 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2P8bUbB005301; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 00:37:30 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2P8bS6b005282; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 00:37:28 -0800 Resent-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 00:37:28 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <000d01c41244$6b27c0e0$0500a8c0 nixlaptop> From: "Nick Palmer" To: References: <6.0.3.0.2.20040324180721.01cedff8 pop.mindspring.com> Subject: Re: Park's brain may fall out! NRL report cont. Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 08:37:28 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53689 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Jed wrote <> << when I contacted skeptics they often responded by saying, "Where's the proof! Show me the proof!" Now they do not respond at all>> Cold fusion advocates rule OK. Go Jed!! Nick Palmer From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Mar 25 00:42:13 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2P8g5e5012059; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 00:42:05 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2P8g4cH012046; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 00:42:04 -0800 Resent-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 00:42:04 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 23:48:58 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Life On Ice Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53690 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Looks like NASA finally carved into a chunk of clear ice, instead of the kind being dined upon by lichen. All that ice being blown out of the crater, I guess they had to run across some clear ice sooner or later. The above photos focus at differing depths. Looks like life indications to me, but it could be just an illusion, like the little two eyed critter with the cute little mouth up in the upper left hand corner. 8^) Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Mar 25 01:46:01 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2P9jobB017866; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 01:45:54 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2P9jms4017836; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 01:45:48 -0800 Resent-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 01:45:48 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <003101c4124d$f873fff0$0500a8c0 nixlaptop> From: "Nick Palmer" To: References: Subject: Re: Salt Lake Tribune Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 08:45:48 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53691 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Horace, I seem to remember that in 1989 Jones was also working on something like pressure caused fusion -i.e. something like quartz crystals shock loaded or something - that would definitely not have been hot fusion, no? Nick Palmer From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Mar 25 02:10:39 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2PAAQbB022202; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 02:10:27 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2PAAPL3022191; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 02:10:25 -0800 Resent-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 02:10:25 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: rick+highsurf.com mail.highsurf.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 00:10:17 -1000 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Rick Monteverde Subject: Re: Life On Ice Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53692 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Horace - Dunno if that's ice, an overjoyed NASA might have said something by now if that's what it was. But the features do look like glassy cracks and dings - obsidian maybe? - R. >2M1.JPG> > >2M1.JPG> > >Looks like NASA finally carved into a chunk of clear ice, instead of the >kind being dined upon by lichen. All that ice being blown out of the >crater, I guess they had to run across some clear ice sooner or later. The >above photos focus at differing depths. Looks like life indications to me, >but it could be just an illusion, like the little two eyed critter with the >cute little mouth up in the upper left hand corner. 8^) > >Regards, > >Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Mar 25 02:37:26 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2PAbJe5030814; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 02:37:23 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2PAbH9S030801; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 02:37:17 -0800 Resent-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 02:37:17 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-Id: <2.2.32.20040325103552.006d6e44 pop.freeserve.net> X-Sender: grimer2.freeserve.co.uk pop.freeserve.net X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 2.2 (32) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 10:35:52 +0000 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Grimer Subject: Re: Park's brain may fall out! NRL report cont. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ultra6.eskimo.com id i2PAbAe5030783 Resent-Message-ID: <16Kp6B.A.NhH.dZrYAB ultra6.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53693 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 06:45 pm 24-03-04 -0500, you wrote: >On 3/24/04 5:49 PM, "Steve Krivit" wrote: > >The human drama that will play out over the coming weeks and months will be >both delicious and revolting to watch. The scenario we are faced with is >something like the Biblical drama of the Egyptians chasing the fleeing >Israelites across the parted Red Sea. The mighty chariots and warriors have >no fear that they can vanquish the rag tag band of ex-slaves as they charge >after them across the muddy marshes. Little do they know however that they, >the taskmasters, will be drowned by torrents of truth as the sea closes in >on them and the ex-slaves make it ‹eventually ‹ to the Promised Land. > > - Gene Mallove That is delicious 8-) FG From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Mar 25 02:53:13 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2PAr8bB029303; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 02:53:08 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2PAr6WQ029280; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 02:53:06 -0800 Resent-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 02:53:06 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <001601c41257$ebe00b80$c864a8c0 win98> From: To: References: Subject: Re: Life On Ice Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 12:56:53 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53694 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Hey Horace, I just shocked few minutes ago, seeing microscobic pictures of sol 79 prior to reading your posting. Maybe today wake-up song of the rover is "Ice Ice Baby" from Vanilla Ice. Regards, hamdix ----- Original Message ----- From: "Horace Heffner" To: Sent: 25 March 2004 10:48 Subject: Life On Ice > 2M1.JPG> > > 2M1.JPG> > > Looks like NASA finally carved into a chunk of clear ice, instead of the > kind being dined upon by lichen. All that ice being blown out of the > crater, I guess they had to run across some clear ice sooner or later. The > above photos focus at differing depths. Looks like life indications to me, > but it could be just an illusion, like the little two eyed critter with the > cute little mouth up in the upper left hand corner. 8^) > > Regards, > > Horace Heffner > > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Mar 25 04:42:56 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2PCgcbB016527; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 04:42:38 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2PCgb12016514; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 04:42:37 -0800 Resent-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 04:42:37 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <002601c41267$330036c0$c864a8c0 win98> From: To: References: <001601c41257$ebe00b80$c864a8c0@win98> Subject: Re: Life On Ice Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 14:46:14 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53695 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Using two images http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/m/079/2M133382710EFF2232P2977M2M1.JPG for right eye and http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/m/079/2M133383049EFF2232P2977M2M1.JPG for left eye, I am able to have a stereographic view of this area. The small stone at the center gives a 3D shape, but the shades "under the ice" gives no dept. This means the surface is not transparent, rather these shades are on the surface or very close, within a mm. This strongly weaken the clear ice hypothesis. Despite this it is hard to understand why these shades are appears as out of focus. Maybe not clean ice but dirty and nearly opaque. And why a large area of brushed or carved section is featureless except these slight shade undulation? On the other hand, shades on the bottom, at the unbrushed section appears as slightly bumpy, light shades correspond to elevations and darks to impressions. Sand particles spread on this section appears to follow this bumpy surface, again suggesting the surface is opaque. Note: I have no stereoscopic apparatus to see 3D, I just put two images side by side and cross my eyes. Horace, may you can fit URL' in one line by cutting the "http://" part. ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Sent: 25 March 2004 12:56 Subject: Re: Life On Ice > Hey Horace, > I just shocked few minutes ago, seeing microscobic pictures of sol 79 prior to > reading your posting. Maybe today wake-up song of the rover is "Ice Ice Baby" > from Vanilla Ice. > > Regards, hamdix > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Horace Heffner" > To: > Sent: 25 March 2004 10:48 > Subject: Life On Ice > > > > > 2M1.JPG> > > > > > 2M1.JPG> > > > > Looks like NASA finally carved into a chunk of clear ice, instead of the > > kind being dined upon by lichen. All that ice being blown out of the > > crater, I guess they had to run across some clear ice sooner or later. The > > above photos focus at differing depths. Looks like life indications to me, > > but it could be just an illusion, like the little two eyed critter with the > > cute little mouth up in the upper left hand corner. 8^) > > > > Regards, > > > > Horace Heffner > > > > > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Mar 25 07:03:25 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2PF3Ke5020503; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 07:03:21 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2PF3IqG020475; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 07:03:18 -0800 Resent-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 07:03:18 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-Id: <6.0.2.0.1.20040325094059.01b7acb8 alcor.concordia.ca> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.2.0 Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 10:00:14 -0500 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Bart Simon Subject: Re: Salt Lake Tribune In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.35 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53696 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Hi Horace, hi everyone... I can't resist being pulled out of lurk mode, especially with all these interesting new developments. Horace said: >Also interesting to hear background and some views of Bart Simon, a long >time reader and poster on this list. (Still lurking I assume Bart?) It is >surprising to hear Bart Simon's opinion that funding is not available for >the field because of the notariety brought to the field by Pons and >Fleischmann's premature announcement. This is nonsense. There would be no >field of cold fusion if it weren't for Fleischmann and Pons. I really couldn't agree more but I'm not sure I did a good job making myself clear on the phone -- I didn't say that FPs announcement was premature at all... its just that the ensuing debate in the public sphere had a negative impact on the development of experimental practice. IMO, science doesn't work that well when folks are impugning each others integrity... as a result a perfectly legitimate scientific enterprise has been stigmatized. Unlike others here I don't blame anyone in particular but rather an unintended consequence of almost everyones best intentions (and I also admit not everyone was a saint in this story...). Sorry about this but its a sociological conceit - we never blame individuals just collectivities.. heh, that's why we are sociologists, its also why we don't do so well in the press -- newspapers always need good guys and bad guys. Anyway I have always viewed the stigma of CF as a two-sided coin -- On the one hand the stigma has hurt the development of CF work because of the difficulty in obtaining resources (money has been the largest but not the only issue -- labour in the form of students is another big one) on the other hand, the cf field is historically notable for its development as a nearly open research community willing to engage all manner of questions and ideas in ways that institutionalized sciences often fail to do. My main point, and the point of my book has always been that nothing particularly unscientific is going on with CF research at all and indeed, there is plenty to learn about how to do science from the best CF researchers. Well that was the point of my story in the interview -- it didn't all get into the paper the way I wanted it but i'm terrible to talk to on the phone... still the article is not too bad at all. cheers, Bart From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Mar 25 07:23:59 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2PFNqe5025937; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 07:23:53 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2PFNpXH025918; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 07:23:51 -0800 Resent-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 07:23:51 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-Id: <6.0.3.0.2.20040325102139.01cee118 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell mindspring.com@pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.3.0 Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 10:24:46 -0500 To: vortex-L eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: Re: Park's brain may fall out! NRL report cont. Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ultra6.eskimo.com id i2PFNne5025893 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53697 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Eugene F. Mallove writes: > Steve’s capsule assessment is right on target ­ the examples he has > gathered are fine ­ they are wonderful. Yes. Excellent work, Steve. > I’d be very happy if no report came out until January 2005. This > would really hurt the pseudoskeptics very badly. It would allow > positive ­ and negative ­speculation to continue for quite a while, no > matter what the report formally said eventually. An interesting point. I hadn't thought of that. I do not know how long the panel will actually work, but I am sure the report will not come out before the election, for political reasons. I hope the panel looks at Iwamura's work. - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Mar 25 08:51:22 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2PGp7nV017816; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 08:51:08 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2PGosBK017758; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 08:50:54 -0800 Resent-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 08:50:54 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f From: Standing Bear To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Life On Ice Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 12:03:30 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <001601c41257$ebe00b80$c864a8c0@win98> <002601c41267$330036c0$c864a8c0@win98> In-Reply-To: <002601c41267$330036c0$c864a8c0 win98> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200403251203.30804.rockcast earthlink.net> Resent-Message-ID: <4f4X0C.A.UVE.t3wYAB ultra5.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53698 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: On Thursday 25 March 2004 07:46, hamdix iris.com.tr wrote: > Using two images > http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/m/079/2M133382710EFF2232P2977M >2M1.JPG for right eye and > http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/m/079/2M133383049EFF2232P2977M >2M1.JPG for left eye, I am able to have a stereographic view of this area. > The small stone at the center gives a 3D shape, but the shades "under the > ice" gives no dept. This means the surface is not transparent, rather these > shades are on the surface or very close, within a mm. This strongly weaken > the clear ice hypothesis. Despite this it is hard to understand why these > shades are appears as out of focus. Maybe not clean ice but dirty and > nearly opaque. And why a large area of brushed or carved section is > featureless except these slight shade undulation? On the other hand, shades > on the bottom, at the unbrushed section appears as slightly bumpy, light > shades correspond to elevations and darks to impressions. Sand particles > spread on this section appears to follow this bumpy surface, again > suggesting the surface is opaque. > > Note: I have no stereoscopic apparatus to see 3D, I just put two images > side by side and cross my eyes. > > Horace, may you can fit URL' in one line by cutting the "http://" part. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: > To: > Sent: 25 March 2004 12:56 > Subject: Re: Life On Ice > > > Hey Horace, > > I just shocked few minutes ago, seeing microscobic pictures of sol 79 > > prior to reading your posting. Maybe today wake-up song of the rover is > > "Ice Ice Baby" from Vanilla Ice. > > > > Regards, hamdix > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Horace Heffner" > > To: > > Sent: 25 March 2004 10:48 > > Subject: Life On Ice > > > > > > >2977M 2M1.JPG> > > > > > > > >2977M 2M1.JPG> > > > > > > Looks like NASA finally carved into a chunk of clear ice, instead of > > > the kind being dined upon by lichen. All that ice being blown out of > > > the crater, I guess they had to run across some clear ice sooner or > > > later. The above photos focus at differing depths. Looks like life > > > indications to me, but it could be just an illusion, like the little > > > two eyed critter with the cute little mouth up in the upper left hand > > > corner. 8^) > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Horace Heffner Your letters hit my system in morning. By 1145hrs ET, the pix were gone from NASA's servers. In its place were '404' errors. Maybe NASA is now censoring its pix to include 'out' any that would tell the truth? Also, your letter broke the URL into two lines. The broken lines generated 'four-0-four' errors all by themselves until the mistake was found. The corrected line met a similar fate, however, so gave up on NASA to give me the pix. Incidentally, Mozilla and Konqueror do not like each other so that URL's meant for Konqueror will not copy and paste into Mozilla's address window. They have to be hand typed. That gets a little mean if the URL is over so many characters long. Sincerely Standing Bear From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Mar 25 09:12:59 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2PHCpfo019737; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 09:12:51 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2PHCmkZ019722; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 09:12:48 -0800 Resent-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 09:12:48 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f From: Standing Bear To: vortex-l eskimo.com, "Jones Beene" Subject: Re: Superoxide Anions and Over-Unity Electrolysis Cells? Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 12:26:22 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <00df01c410cc$c82a3a80$8680b341 computer> <001d01c411d3$d0e42200$8837fea9@cpq> In-Reply-To: <001d01c411d3$d0e42200$8837fea9 cpq> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200403251226.22112.rockcast earthlink.net> Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53699 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: On Wednesday 24 March 2004 14:11, Jones Beene wrote: > One more comment on the site that Fred forwarded yesterday. > > It has significant relevance to chemical overunity in any reaction where > water, excess oxygen and electrical current are found to produce an energy > anomaly. > > http://www.astaxanthin.org/oxidation.htm > > I think that almost everyone on this forum who has a background with some > degree of classical physics education, has been conditioned to believe that > there is no such thing as chemical OU. Consequently, it is a common belief > that if a reaction shows significant OU, then it must of necessity be > either LENR, CANR, CF, or hydrino, etc... or measurement error. > > This may not be the case. Here are some further thoughts on the likelihood > that OU is available through chemistry alone, despite the fact that you > were taught otherwise in university. It need not employ recourse to ZPE, > which is equally controversial to LENR. Personally I believe that chemical > OU does involve a Casimir-type geometry - which is arguably ZPE, but that > is another issue. > > The key point is that the appearance of excess heat in many different kinds > of experiments may not involve conversion of nuclear mass to energy at > all... or even conversion of electron angular momentum into excess energy, > but instead may involve a single common denominator. That common > denominator is a reaction where a "bare proton" is allowed to stay bare for > a long enough time span, and often enough, to attract whatever mass-energy > is available from whatever extra-dimensional source. One really need not > get more specific about the source of excess energy than that. > > And if you follow "hot fusion" and this hypothesis is correct, you may have > already noticed this irony. If one could provide a loss-free containment > structure for protons, eliminating Bremsstrahlung for instance, and using > RTSC, then one would not need 'fusion' at all. The power density would be > lower, but so what. > > The bare proton seems to be the key to chemical overunity. It may operate > like a 4-space antenna. We also beginning to get a grasp on the threshold > numbers which are involved because water itself does have a lot of > temporarily bare protons, which are not bare for long enough... until > moderately stimulated. This stimulation process often involves the > superoxidation of water, which is a bit counter-intuitive, until one looks > at superoxidation itself as a kind of pseudo-reduction reaction! It is a > kind of pseudo-reduction that competes with hydrogen reduction in any type > of complex redox process, in order to keep the proton "bare" for longer. > In this context "longer" is measured in billionths or trillionths of a > second. > > I think that I can prove this hypothesis logically in a kind of "thought > experiment" .... or Gedankenexperiment, if you prefer, Herr Feynman. But > that involves an even longer post, or perhaps its own web page eventually. > > BTW, R. Feynman's "Brownian Ratchet" was a "perpetual motion" machine, > concocted in a Gedankenexperiment, which did not violate the second law. It > didn't work, either, but this one could. > > This KEY concept to chemical OU is a sequentially reversible *chain > reaction.* > > We know for an absolute fact that certain chemical reactions involving > oxygen and hydrogen are NOT thermodynamically balanced. Water electrolysis > is NOT balanced thermodynamically when reversed, and this has been proven > over and over again, but it is not exactly showing up in physics textbooks. > Apparently experts like Ed Storms don't believe it, even though the > references I have cited in the past are clear and unambiguous. > > That small bit of excess energy, a fractional eV, would be available from > this lack of reversibility but it is normally unusable, just as Brownian > motion is unusable, because it is way too miniscule, in and of itself. > > How does one convert the miniscule into the grand, Dr Graneau (Dr. > Big-Water)? > > Well, just follow the argument in the web-site cited above down to the > bottom where a particular generic type of chain reaction is described. > Certain superoxidative radicals can work on many substrates, even water, by > "stealing" an electron in a chain reaction. Superoxidative radicals can be > analogized to gas-electrodes which provide electrolysis in situ. The > resulting substrate becomes immediately a radical itself, and can react > electrochemically with other non-fuel molecules in a *chain reaction.* > Multiply any small gain by 10^20 and it is unusable. But multiply it by > 10^23 and you have significant OU. If you provide a superoxidative > environment where hydrogen reduction by bare protons is inhibited or > delayed by the action of a superoxide, then it may be possible to speed up > the threshold for OU from hours or days to 50-100 times per second. > > Timing is everything. > > At this geometric scale, where a highly reactive chemically reversibly > reaction (superoxidation) can be accomplished in less than a picosecond, > one only need provide an extended "opportunity". That means that in any > type of sequential conversion process where, say a chemical explosion takes > place, then the superoxidative chain reaction, the unbalanced "see-saw" > must be enhanced to where the product of its number of iterations times the > number of molecules involved exceeds roughly 10^23 per cycle. > > Sorry, Frank Z, I can't think of how that number can be shoehorned into > megahertz-meter but I'm trying to eliminate a few zeros somehow... > > Jones > > To wax philosophical, one could opine that in the study of LIFE itself - in > all its many nuances, there are three major tenets. These are (in order of > importance): 1) Timing is everything > 2) Timing is everything > 3) Timing is everything > > Which begs the question: is humor anti-entropic? I dunno. Many years more than I care to remember ago there was a comic strip that had a mad scientist in it with a huge 'Rube Goldberg contraption' that produced energy from 'bent atoms'. The scientist's name was 'Adam Bender'! Go figure! Given the strangeness of quantum mechanics and QCD, maybe there is now even room for him. After all, the Rovers have semi vindicated Velikovskiy with regards to Mars. Standing Bear From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Mar 25 09:21:49 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2PHLanV025911; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 09:21:38 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2PHLZWf025890; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 09:21:35 -0800 Resent-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 09:21:35 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.2.20040325092452.00ab8ef8 mail.dlsi.net> X-Sender: stevek mail.dlsi.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9 Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 09:25:04 -0800 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Steve Krivit Subject: Re: Park's brain may fall out! NRL report cont. In-Reply-To: <6.0.3.0.2.20040325102139.01cee118 pop.mindspring.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53700 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: thanks Jed >Yes. Excellent work, Steve. S From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Mar 25 09:23:32 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2PHNPdo022304; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 09:23:26 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2PHNOtQ022295; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 09:23:24 -0800 Resent-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 09:23:24 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <406315D9.6010607 pobox.com> Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 12:24:41 -0500 From: "Stephen A. Lawrence" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Life On Ice References: <001601c41257$ebe00b80$c864a8c0@win98> <002601c41267$330036c0$c864a8c0@win98> <200403251203.30804.rockcast@earthlink.net> In-Reply-To: <200403251203.30804.rockcast earthlink.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53701 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Standing Bear wrote: > Incidentally, Mozilla and Konqueror do not like each other so that URL's > meant for Konqueror will not copy and paste into Mozilla's address window. > They have to be hand typed. Ironic since they're both front ends on the same browser engine (Gecko). It may be possible to work around the problem, tho. Suggestions: 1) Note that Mozilla has two ways to paste, ^V and middle-click. They don't do the same thing. Try both, making sure you selected and cut in between; one may work. 2) Konqueror, being a Mozilla front end, probably has two ways to copy: select alone, and ^C after select. Copy from the edit menu _may_ do something different yet again from ^C (historically one was "copy" and one was "quick copy" but almost nobody knew the difference). Try both; one may work better in transfering data to Mozilla. 3) Finally, if all else fails get someone else to intercede. Emacs and Xterm are the two I use when two third-party programs simply won't get along. Two approaches: -- Open an Emacs window (Stallman Emacs is my personal fave but Xemacs no doubt does the job too). Paste the string into Emacs, then copy it out again. Make sure you select the text _and_ use esc-w, just to load up both of X's cut buffers, and try pasting into Mozilla. -- If that doesn't do it, use an Xterm window. That nearly always works but it's more tedious. Here's how I do it: a) Open an Xterm b) Run Emacs in the xterm, as "emacs -nw". "nw" => No Window => use the Xterm window, don't open your own. c) Paste the item into a scratch buffer in the Emacs inside the Xterm. Then copy it out again. With Xterm, you just use click/drag to select and copy; there's no ^C needed. Using an Emacs inside the Xterm isn't totally necessary but it keeps the Xterm from trying to execute whatever you pasted as a command. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Mar 25 09:55:14 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2PHt5do030716; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 09:55:06 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2PHt4Z5030694; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 09:55:04 -0800 Resent-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 09:55:04 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 09:02:02 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: N.Y.TIMES REPORTS: D.O.E. TO RECONSIDER COLD FUSION Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53702 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 11:39 PM 3/24/4, Steve Krivit wrote: >"THE 2004 COLD FUSION REPORT" PROVIDED BACKGROUND INFORMATION >TO NEW YORK TIMES REPORTER KENNETH CHANG FOR STORY RESEARCH > > >LOS ANGELES, March 25, 2004 -- Investigators Steven Krivit and Nadine >Winocur have released the most current work on the history and progress of >the science. "The 2004 Cold Fusion Report," the outcome of a four-year >investigation, establishes the veracity of cold fusion. [snip] >"This is a fine report. It is a work well done, the old-fashioned way, with >hard work. >I hope the world reads it -- it is well-written and powerful. >I hope the world acts on it -- it is clear, concise and concrete." >- Dr. Michael Staker, materials scientist and research engineer, U.S. Army >Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Grounds [snip] Awesome! Kudos to Steve Krivit and Nadine Winocur! When's the book and movie coming? 8^) Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Mar 25 09:56:30 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2PHu8Yt003315; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 09:56:10 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2PHu6tR003294; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 09:56:06 -0800 Resent-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 09:56:06 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 09:02:06 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: Life On Ice Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53703 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 12:10 AM 3/25/4, Rick Monteverde wrote: >Horace - > >Dunno if that's ice, an overjoyed NASA might have said something by now if >that's what it was. But the features do look like glassy cracks and dings >- obsidian maybe? > >- R. > >>>2M1.JPG> >> >>>2M1.JPG> Obsidian was the first thing in my mind when I saw the images. However, if you browse around and compare pairs of images you can see that the photos are taken at differing distances and that some of the structures change relative positions depending on perspective. As far as I know this could only happen if they were 3d objects. It admittedly could be just wishful thinking on my part, but I did look at details before posting and figured wahtever the stuf is it must be transparent to at least a small depth. It would be most intersting if another spot were ground on the far side, to see if light came through from the back side. Also, it appears the wire brush is capable of scarring the surface. A wire brush should not serverely scar obsidian, should it? Obsidian is pretty hard. The thing that bothers me most is the clarity of the surface. It doesn't seem like ice should grind to that kind of polish. Only heat would be likely to do that. Maybe it is warm on Mars this sol, or maybe the grinder was heated a lot? The "warm on Mars" explanation doesn't work because you can clearly see grinding remnants on the surface that did not melt. At 2:46 PM 3/25/4, wrote: >Using two images >http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/m/079/2M133382710EFF2232P2977M >2M1.JPG >for right eye and >http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/m/079/2M133383049EFF2232P2977M >2M1.JPG >for left eye, I am able to have a stereographic view of this area. The small >stone at the center gives a 3D shape, but the shades "under the ice" gives no >dept. This means the surface is not transparent, rather these shades are on the >surface or very close, within a mm. This strongly weaken the clear ice >hypothesis. Despite this it is hard to understand why these shades are appears >as out of focus. Maybe not clean ice but dirty and nearly opaque. And why a >large area of brushed or carved section is featureless except these slight >shade >undulation? On the other hand, shades on the bottom, at the unbrushed section >appears as slightly bumpy, light shades correspond to elevations and darks to >impressions. Sand particles spread on this section appears to follow this bumpy >surface, again suggesting the surface is opaque. > >Note: I have no stereoscopic apparatus to see 3D, I just put two images side by >side and cross my eyes. It is much better I think to view in two separate windows that are superimposed and switch rapidly between windows. I have more to say below. At 12:03 PM 3/25/4, Standing Bear wrote: [snip] >Your letters hit my system in morning. By 1145hrs ET, the pix were gone from >NASA's servers. In its place were '404' errors. Maybe NASA is now censoring >its pix to include 'out' any that would tell the truth? Also, your letter >broke the URL into two lines. The broken lines generated 'four-0-four' >errors all by themselves until the mistake was found. The corrected line met >a similar fate, however, so gave up on NASA to give me the pix. > Incidentally, Mozilla and Konqueror do not like each other so that URL's >meant for Konqueror will not copy and paste into Mozilla's address window. >They have to be hand typed. That gets a little mean if the URL is over >so many characters long. I don't understand this. A URL is a URL. They are text. I cut the above URL's from Mozilla. There are currently JPGs at the JPL site for the above URLs. However, I must say they are not the photos I thought I was looking at when I posted! In fact, they reloaded when I referenced them to check out what you are saying. They were not in my cache, so they took a long time to load. Very strange. I don't think anything underhanded is going on however, because the photos I want are still there, just relocated and under differing names, or maybe I just messed up as usual. Soooo... let's try this again. Here are the photo URL's as best as I can give them (the vortex list server forces line wrap on them.) Here they are in the format Hamdi suggested: marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/m/079/2M133386588EFF2232P2957M2M1.JPG marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/m/079/2M133386649EFF2232P2977M2M1.JPG Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Mar 25 10:07:18 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2PI79Yt006226; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 10:07:11 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2PI788s006211; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 10:07:08 -0800 Resent-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 10:07:08 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <40632085.4CD86E95 ix.netcom.com> Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 10:10:12 -0800 From: Edmund Storms Organization: Energy K System X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77C-CCK-MCD {C-UDP; EBM-APPLE} (Macintosh; U; PPC) X-Accept-Language: en,pdf MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Superoxide Anions and Over-Unity Electrolysis Cells? References: <00df01c410cc$c82a3a80$8680b341 computer> <001d01c411d3$d0e42200$8837fea9@cpq> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53704 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Jones Beene wrote: > snip > > BTW, R. Feynman's "Brownian Ratchet" was a "perpetual motion" machine, concocted in a Gedankenexperiment, which did not violate the second law. It didn't work, either, but this one could. > > This KEY concept to chemical OU is a sequentially reversible *chain reaction.* > > We know for an absolute fact that certain chemical reactions involving oxygen and hydrogen are NOT thermodynamically balanced. Water electrolysis is NOT balanced thermodynamically when reversed, and this has been proven over and over again, but it is not exactly showing up in physics textbooks. Apparently experts like Ed Storms don't believe it, even though the references I have cited in the past are clear and unambiguous. Well Jones, I'm confused about what you think I don't believe. Many chemical reactions are not reversible. This does not make them over unity, as many calorimetric measurements made over the years have shown. Electrolysis is potentially a reversible reaction, but is seldom done under reversible conditions. Electrolysis can easily be shown not to be over unity, except under the very special conditions associated with cold fusion. So, I don't understand the point you are making. Are you saying that a source of energy separate from that obtained from the observed nuclear reactions is available when water is electrolyzed? Mills claims one other source and the Correas (Mallove) claim a third source. Are your suggesting a fourth source? Ed > > > That small bit of excess energy, a fractional eV, would be available from this lack of reversibility but it is normally unusable, just as Brownian motion is unusable, because it is way too miniscule, in and of itself. > > How does one convert the miniscule into the grand, Dr Graneau (Dr. Big-Water)? > snip From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Mar 25 10:09:42 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2PI9Zdo002159; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 10:09:36 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2PI9YPU002147; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 10:09:34 -0800 Resent-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 10:09:34 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 09:16:32 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: Life On Ice Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53705 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 12:24 PM 3/25/4, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote: >Using an Emacs inside the Xterm isn't totally necessary but it keeps the >Xterm from trying to execute whatever you pasted as a command. Arg! Now that I see this discussion I am wondering if the problem is trying to cut and paste two lines all in one operation. This won't work because there is a carriage return and line end at the end of the first line that in effect wipes it out. I paste the second line into Mozilla's URL window first, then cut (excluding the line end CR) and paste the first line in at the front before hitting enter. This works fine for me, but I am working on a RedHat linux. Hamdi's solution also works in this case, provided the URL is not too long, because you just type in the http:// part at the front. BTW, I run my email on an old Mac Performa 5200. Am thinking about upgrading to a G5. I wonder if its worth the expense and trouble. I have a feeling I will have trouble getting my many years worth of Eudora 1.5.3 email upgraded so I can continue to do searches on it. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Mar 25 10:16:41 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2PIGXdo003744; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 10:16:33 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2PIGWAR003729; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 10:16:32 -0800 Resent-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 10:16:32 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <40632237.3020004 rtpatlanta.com> Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 13:17:27 -0500 From: "Terry Blanton" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: N.Y.TIMES REPORTS: D.O.E. TO RECONSIDER COLD FUSION References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53706 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Horace Heffner wrote: >When's the book and movie coming? 8^) > :-) Here's the NYT article. Free registration may be required: http://www.nytimes.com/2004/03/25/science/25FUSI.html From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Mar 25 10:35:05 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2PIYvdo008157; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 10:34:58 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2PIYtFq008139; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 10:34:55 -0800 Resent-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 10:34:55 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 09:41:47 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: Salt Lake Tribune Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53707 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 10:00 AM 3/25/4, Bart Simon wrote: >Hi Horace, hi everyone... > >I can't resist being pulled out of lurk mode, Wonderful! [snip] >I really couldn't agree more but I'm not sure I did a good job making >myself clear on the phone -- When I see reporting of events I've witnessed I wonder how on earth anyone could get the facts so mixed up. Sometimes I think it must only in part be reporter confusion. The main problem may be editors rewording things so they sound better, and deleting critical information in order to save space, but in the process destroying the reporter's intended meaning. [snip] >Anyway I have always viewed the stigma of CF as a two-sided coin -- On the >one hand the stigma has hurt the development of CF work because of the >difficulty in obtaining resources (money has been the largest but not the >only issue -- labour in the form of students is another big one) on the >other hand, the cf field is historically notable for its development as a >nearly open research community willing to engage all manner of questions >and ideas in ways that institutionalized sciences often fail to do. Yes, that the stigma exists is undeniable. At least high school kids seem willing to take a risk, but they get politically correctivised when they get to college. >My >main point, and the point of my book has always been that nothing >particularly unscientific is going on with CF research at all and indeed, >there is plenty to learn about how to do science from the best CF researchers. Yep ... and at long last the undead seem to be rising up from the coffin to shake people up a little! 8^) >Well that was the point of my story in the interview -- it didn't all get >into the paper the way I wanted it but i'm terrible to talk to on the >phone... still the article is not too bad at all. Thanks for responding. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Mar 25 10:47:25 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2PIlHdo011894; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 10:47:18 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2PIlH2P011873; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 10:47:17 -0800 Resent-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 10:47:17 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <4063297E.4050005 pobox.com> Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 13:48:30 -0500 From: "Stephen A. Lawrence" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Life On Ice References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53708 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Horace Heffner wrote: > > BTW, I run my email on an old Mac Performa 5200. Am thinking about > upgrading to a G5. I wonder if its worth the expense and trouble. I have > a feeling I will have trouble getting my many years worth of Eudora 1.5.3 > email upgraded so I can continue to do searches on it. I haven't used Eudora, so I don't know what you'd be giving up by switching to another mail reader. But it surely seems like it would be possible (lots of other people have been in the same position). After a brief web search it looks like you could transfer the files to Mozilla without much trouble. Eudora apparently saves them as plain text, and the two products are more or less compatible. I also suspect you could get it into Emacs VM without much trouble, and that can export into some standard formats. (VM itself is a pretty nice mail reader but it's not really very graphical, so multiple mailboxes are harder to juggle with it than with, e.g., Mozilla.) Sorry -- this is getting 'way off topic... From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Mar 25 10:51:52 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2PIpYYt018904; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 10:51:39 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2PIpXXP018889; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 10:51:33 -0800 Resent-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 10:51:33 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <40632AEF.9F686FDA ix.netcom.com> Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 10:54:38 -0800 From: Edmund Storms Organization: Energy K System X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77C-CCK-MCD {C-UDP; EBM-APPLE} (Macintosh; U; PPC) X-Accept-Language: en,pdf MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Life On Ice References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53709 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Horace Heffner wrote: > At 12:24 PM 3/25/4, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote: > > >Using an Emacs inside the Xterm isn't totally necessary but it keeps the > >Xterm from trying to execute whatever you pasted as a command. > > Arg! Now that I see this discussion I am wondering if the problem is > trying to cut and paste two lines all in one operation. This won't work > because there is a carriage return and line end at the end of the first > line that in effect wipes it out. I paste the second line into Mozilla's > URL window first, then cut (excluding the line end CR) and paste the first > line in at the front before hitting enter. This works fine for me, but I > am working on a RedHat linux. > Hamdi's solution also works in this case, provided the URL is not too long, > because you just type in the http:// part at the front. > > BTW, I run my email on an old Mac Performa 5200. Am thinking about > upgrading to a G5. I wonder if its worth the expense and trouble. I have > a feeling I will have trouble getting my many years worth of Eudora 1.5.3 > email upgraded so I can continue to do searches on it. Good for you, Horace. I recently upgraded from a 7600 Power Mac to an iMAC and have been very pleased. Both OS9.5 and OS10.28 can run together or separately so that many old programs can be accessed. Also, your Performa can be easily networked to the G5 so that you can transfer files. Ed > > > Regards, > > Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Mar 25 11:41:00 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2PJer9E000385; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 11:40:54 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2PJeWu9032739; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 11:40:32 -0800 Resent-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 11:40:32 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 10:46:33 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: Life On Ice Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53710 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Thanks guys for the encouraging words on Macs. Well, for fun here goes a continuation of the crackpot "Life On Ice" notion easily disproved by those in the know, assuming it is bogus. The JPL website says: "An early morning review of the alpha particle X-ray spectrometer data revealed that the instrument's doors were not fully open and that the tool did not completely engage at the intended "New York" target on the rock dubbed "Mazatzal."" Assuming the x-ray spectrometer was warm, the fact the door was closed might account for the ice surface melt giving us a clear window into the ice. This would also account for the fact the granules laying on top here and there do not melt. The plot thickens. A good 3d rendering would sure be handy. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Mar 25 12:21:02 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2PKKvtA002672; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 12:20:57 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2PKKt6K002657; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 12:20:55 -0800 Resent-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 12:20:55 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <001301c412a6$a2e675a0$8837fea9 cpq> From: "Jones Beene" To: "vortex" References: <00df01c410cc$c82a3a80$8680b341 computer> <001d01c411d3$d0e42200$8837fea9@cpq> <40632085.4CD86E95@ix.netcom.com> Subject: Re: Superoxide Anions and Over-Unity Electrolysis Cells? Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 12:20:37 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ultra6.eskimo.com id i2PKKrtA002635 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53711 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Edmund Storms wrote: >"Electrolysis is potentially a reversible reaction, but is seldom done under reversible conditions. Electrolysis can easily be shown not to be over unity, except under the very special conditions associated with cold fusion. So, I don't understand the point you are making." There are three points to be made, Ed, at least three. But let me stress that I am just throwing out possibilities for explaining a way that overunity can occur in a chemical chain reaction - based on valid experimental evidence, without making any kind of firm claim that it is the sole source of excess heat in CF - only that it may be a contributing source... plus, it is seldom... almost never, considered as a potential source of overunity - for the reasons stated before, when perhaps it should be. First, as to your contention about electrolysis overunity. Here is one of many references, several of which are available on lenr-canr.org: ON CURRENT DENSITY AND EXCESS POWER DENSITY IN ELECTROLYSIS EXPERIMENTS by Dan Chicea (paper presented at ICCF9) http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/ChiceaDoncurrentd.pdf As you probably know, Chicea is an associate of George Miley. GM helped him with this study and presumably accepted the accuracy of the results. Without the shadow of Miley, one might be inclined to discount the importance of these findings. Here is one of many clear reports of excess power from electrolysis which cannot be due to D+D "cold fusion." If you look at the chart of the excess power, i.e. the " f ratio" it is the number that describes the experiment in respect to the excess power which was achieved with all of the combinations tried: the highest f ratios value in the 10 experiments described in this work is surprising. But basically the offshoot is that light water and Ni cathodes gives better results than Pd/deuterium in similar controlled experiments, which eliminates cold fusion as the major source of excess energy. This doesn't mean that CF is not happening at all, only that it is not always a major source of excess energy, and could conceivably be endothermic, that is: if a substantial contributor to the excess is found elsewhere. The second point relates to the small thermodynamic imbalance in electrolysis, and I mentioned this several months ago: It has been consistently shown that voltage of 1.24 Volts is the threshold potential necessary to separate hydrogen from oxygen in pure water at 77° Fahrenheit (F) and 14.7 pounds per square inch pressure [25° Celsius (C) and 1.03 kilograms (kg) per centimeter ^2.] This is less that the thermodynamic balance of 1.4 eV which is what one finds in physics textbooks. This 1.24 is the end of a "Boltzmann's tail" distribution, and it has heretofore been very difficult to exploit that small one-sixth of an eV per molecule due to the low reaction cross-section at 1.24 volts when using solid electrodes.....However, using gaseous virtual electrodes, you can do it over-and-over again sequentially at high probability because you can get the complete field strength of 1.24 which is available at the angstrom spacing of appropriate ions. If you set up a situation where the same water molecules is split-recombined-split-recombined-etc on a nanosecond time scale, so that you can get a "free" 1 eV with every 6 iterations when there are no losses, then this method can result in substantial chemical overunity in a chain reaction. The third point relates to the paradigm shift of a "chemical chain reaction" replacing any need to invoke LENR to explain excess heat. The chemical chain reaction was described in the previous citation and probably requires a slight charge imbalance from free electrons, as Fred Sparber suggested. Fred and I have speculated earlier that this same mechanism may supply about a third of the enormous energy found in hurricanes. > "Are you saying that a source of energy separate from that obtained from the observed nuclear reactions is available when water is electrolyzed?" Almost. I am saying that this is a distinct possibility - one that has yet to be eliminated. In fact, the so-called nuclear reactions of CF are so extremely different from those of normal physics, except for the ash, that they could even be endothermic - we just don't know. > "Mills claims one other source and the Correas (Mallove) claim a third source. Are your suggesting a fourth source?" Actually, if the hypothesis of a "bare proton" stimulus being the single common denominator in all of these is correct, then there may be only that single source. This stimulus specifically exists in the normally rare situation where a bare proton is forced to stay bare for a long enough time span, and often enough sequentially, to attract whatever mass-energy is available from whatever extra-dimensional source. One really need not get more specific about the "real" source of excess energy than that. When comparing explanations, and without high energy photons as corroborating evidence, then any so-called "nuclear" reactions, cold, warm or whatever, are no more probable or likely than an extra-dimensional source. You can put the tag of ZPE on that if you like. As I opined before, the bare proton seems to be the key to overunity, and it may operate like an extradimensional antenna. Maybe the true source of excess energy being captured is the ubiquitous 21 cm. wavelength "background" radiation that bathes our universe. Yes, that particular source is very faint in our 3-space, but if a "bare proton" does indeed turn out to be this kind of 4-space gateway, then we may find that the 21 cm background is actually intense in a higher dimension. There is just not enough information available to make a more specific guess. With the upcoming reviews of the cold fusion field, if it is to be truly thorough... well, it might be prudent for anyone who might offer advice to DoE to at least have all the possible bases covered, at least mentally, as I suspect that some of those involved, if they are thorough enough, will scour all the possibilities - such as by asking "how do you know where the excess energy is coming from"? IMHO, to answer that it "must be cold fusion because we found helium..." may not suffice... Regards, Jones From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Mar 25 12:33:10 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2PKX0tA005424; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 12:33:01 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2PKX0hg005403; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 12:33:00 -0800 Resent-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 12:33:00 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 11:40:00 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: Salt Lake Tribune Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53712 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 11:45 PM 3/24/4, Nick Palmer wrote: >Horace, I seem to remember that in 1989 Jones was also working on something >like pressure caused fusion -i.e. something like quartz crystals shock >loaded or something - that would definitely not have been hot fusion, no? > >Nick Palmer According to page 158 of Mallove's book *Fire From Ice* Jones and Van Siclen published on that in 1986. Apparently the work was not earth shaking in its impact, and was based on sensing the expected (hot fusion signature) neutron generation. Scaramuzzi got some more credible neutron results by cooling and then reheating the titanium loaded samples, but that was post March, 1989. I think there is no doubt at all that Jones was working on fusion, you might even call it cold fusion, during the period 1986-89. The thing is there were no significant anomalous results obtained or published by Jones - significant in the sense that there was any hope in sight of a practical energy source or even a paradigm shift. It is no wonder. To focus on neutrons seems to go nowhere, at least nowhere into the cold fusion regime ... unless perhaps there is some kind of continuity, a half-way regime between hot and cold fusion, where branching ratios change with continuity. That is not to say that Jones is not deserving of credit for doing pioneering work. It is also not to say that neutron work demonstrating anomalous nuclear events is a waste of time, or that it can't lead to a better understanding of cold fusion, low energy transmutation, etc. It just doesn't seem to lead the way to non-chemical heat. My point is that the field of CF as we know it today, as a prospect for a clean radiation-safe energy source, really got its start from Pons and Fleischmann's announcement. Jones apparently was no where near conceptualizing heat without neutrons as a possibility and, from Jed's comments, perhaps he is not there yet. Beyond that, low energy heavy element transmutation was not even on the scope at the time. That got its start from Bockris' group working on P&F style fusion at TAMU if I recall. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Mar 25 12:47:10 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2PKl4O9009864; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 12:47:04 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2PKl36B009852; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 12:47:03 -0800 Resent-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 12:47:03 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <001901c412aa$6dd3e4c0$4a7accd1 MIKEBY3NR533HT> From: "Mike Carrell" To: References: <00df01c410cc$c82a3a80$8680b341 computer> <001d01c411d3$d0e42200$8837fea9@cpq> <40632085.4CD86E95@ix.netcom.com> <001301c412a6$a2e675a0$8837fea9@cpq> Subject: Re: Superoxide Anions and Over-Unity Electrolysis Cells? Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 15:47:40 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53713 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Jones wrote > Here is one of many clear reports of excess power from electrolysis which cannot be due to D+D "cold fusion." If you look at the chart of the excess power, i.e. the " f ratio" it is the number that describes the experiment in respect to the excess power which was achieved with all of the combinations tried: the highest f ratios value in the 10 experiments described in this work is surprising. But basically the offshoot is that light water and Ni cathodes gives better results than Pd/deuterium in similar controlled experiments, which eliminates cold fusion as the major source of excess energy. This doesn't mean that CF is not happening at all, only that it is not always a major source of excess energy, and could conceivably be endothermic, that is: if a substantial contributor to the excess is found elsewhere. ----------------------- Jones visits the HSG (Hydrino Study Group) camp, so he (and others here) will be aware that Mills' original experiments involved light water, nickel electrodes, and potassium carbonate as an electrolyte, and he got excess heat, as K+ is a BLP catalyst. Mills has demonstrated that deuterium atoms work just fine in the BLP reactions, which involve electron orbits, not nuclei. Thus is it not far-fetched to suppose that the BLP reaction could be occuring in some cells intended for CF reactions. > > "Mills claims one other source and the Correas (Mallove) claim a third source. Are your suggesting a fourth source?" > > Actually, if the hypothesis of a "bare proton" stimulus being the single common denominator in all of these is correct, then there may be only that single source. This stimulus specifically exists in the normally rare situation where a bare proton is forced to stay bare for a long enough time span, and often enough sequentially, to attract whatever mass-energy is available from whatever extra-dimensional source. One really need not get more specific about the "real" source of excess energy than that. -------------------- Being familiar with the Corread PAGD reactor but not the more recent orgone work, I can offer that the 'bare protons' don't enter into consideration; it is an aether phenomenon. But here, words are targets for misunderstandings, so perhaps it is well to mark the spot as requiring more investigation. Regards, Mike Carrell From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Mar 25 13:19:36 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2PLJOG7029394; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 13:19:25 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2PLJKpa029339; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 13:19:20 -0800 Resent-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 13:19:20 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <40634D91.58AA4A7F ix.netcom.com> Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 13:22:25 -0800 From: Edmund Storms Organization: Energy K System X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77C-CCK-MCD {C-UDP; EBM-APPLE} (Macintosh; U; PPC) X-Accept-Language: en,pdf MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Superoxide Anions and Over-Unity Electrolysis Cells? References: <00df01c410cc$c82a3a80$8680b341 computer> <001d01c411d3$d0e42200$8837fea9@cpq> <40632085.4CD86E95@ix.netcom.com> <001301c412a6$a2e675a0$8837fea9@cpq> <001901c412aa$6dd3e4c0$4a7accd1@MIKEBY3NR533HT> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53714 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Thanks Mike for the comments. Although a light water cell can not produce energy from fusion, we now know that transmutation reactions occur in such cells. Until excess power is measured along with any likely nuclear products, the occurrence of LENR reactions can not be ruled out. This possibility does not rule out the Mills effect occurring at the same time. At this point, we have two demonstrated sources of energy. I think it premature to introduce additional sources until we know whether or not the known sources can account for all over unity. Ed Mike Carrell wrote: > Jones wrote > > > > Here is one of many clear reports of excess power from electrolysis which > cannot be due to D+D "cold fusion." If you look at the chart of the excess > power, i.e. the " f ratio" it is the number that describes the experiment in > respect to the excess power which was achieved with all of the combinations > tried: the highest f ratios value in the 10 experiments described in this > work is surprising. But basically the offshoot is that light water and Ni > cathodes gives better results than Pd/deuterium in similar controlled > experiments, which eliminates cold fusion as the major source of excess > energy. This doesn't mean that CF is not happening at all, only that it is > not always a major source of excess energy, and could conceivably be > endothermic, that is: if a substantial contributor to the excess is found > elsewhere. > ----------------------- > Jones visits the HSG (Hydrino Study Group) camp, so he (and others here) > will be aware that Mills' original experiments involved light water, nickel > electrodes, and potassium carbonate as an electrolyte, and he got excess > heat, as K+ is a BLP catalyst. Mills has demonstrated that deuterium atoms > work just fine in the BLP reactions, which involve electron orbits, not > nuclei. Thus is it not far-fetched to suppose that the BLP reaction could be > occuring in some cells intended for CF reactions. > > > > > "Mills claims one other source and the Correas (Mallove) claim a third > source. Are your suggesting a fourth source?" > > > > Actually, if the hypothesis of a "bare proton" stimulus being the single > common denominator in all of these is correct, then there may be only that > single source. This stimulus specifically exists in the normally rare > situation where a bare proton is forced to stay bare for a long enough time > span, and often enough sequentially, to attract whatever mass-energy is > available from whatever extra-dimensional source. One really need not get > more specific about the "real" source of excess energy than that. > -------------------- > Being familiar with the Corread PAGD reactor but not the more recent orgone > work, I can offer that the 'bare protons' don't enter into consideration; it > is an aether phenomenon. But here, words are targets for misunderstandings, > so perhaps it is well to mark the spot as requiring more investigation. > > > Regards, > Mike Carrell From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Mar 25 17:16:19 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2Q1GFBr018406; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 17:16:15 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2Q1GCo8018373; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 17:16:12 -0800 Resent-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 17:16:12 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <00bc01c412d0$0d0140e0$6401a8c0 Craig> From: "SnowDog" To: References: <001601c41257$ebe00b80$c864a8c0@win98> <002601c41267$330036c0$c864a8c0@win98> <200403251203.30804.rockcast@earthlink.net> Subject: Re: Life On Ice Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 19:17:04 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53715 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: > On Thursday 25 March 2004 07:46, hamdix iris.com.tr wrote: > > Using two images > > http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/m/079/2M133382710EFF2232P2977M > >2M1.JPG for right eye and > > http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/m/079/2M133383049EFF2232P2977M > >2M1.JPG for left eye, I am able to have a stereographic view of this area. > > The small stone at the center gives a 3D shape, but the shades "under the > > ice" gives no dept. This means the surface is not transparent, rather these > > shades are on the surface or very close, within a mm. This strongly weaken > > the clear ice hypothesis. Hmm... The first image has to go to the left, and the second to the right. I think you had the images reversed. I made a 3D image from the two, and if you use the red lens for the left eye, I think it does look like ice -- maybe. Check it out, if you have 3D glasses. http://www.golddirectory.com/mars/mars.htm Sincerely, Craig Haynie (Houston) From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Mar 25 19:00:37 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2Q30Vxu026897; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 19:00:31 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2Q30JRl026835; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 19:00:19 -0800 Resent-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 19:00:19 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <40639D9F.118703C5 ix.netcom.com> Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 19:04:00 -0800 From: Edmund Storms Organization: Energy K System X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77C-CCK-MCD {C-UDP; EBM-APPLE} (Macintosh; U; PPC) X-Accept-Language: en,pdf MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Superoxide Anions and Over-Unity Electrolysis Cells? References: <00df01c410cc$c82a3a80$8680b341 computer> <001d01c411d3$d0e42200$8837fea9@cpq> <40632085.4CD86E95@ix.netcom.com> <001301c412a6$a2e675a0$8837fea9@cpq> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53716 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Jones Beene wrote: > Edmund Storms wrote: > > >"Electrolysis is potentially a reversible reaction, but is seldom done under reversible conditions. Electrolysis can easily be shown not to be over unity, except under the very special conditions associated with cold fusion. So, I don't understand the point you are making." > > There are three points to be made, Ed, at least three. But let me stress that I am just throwing out possibilities for explaining a way that overunity can occur in a chemical chain reaction - based on valid experimental evidence, without making any kind of firm claim that it is the sole source of excess heat in CF - only that it may be a contributing source... plus, it is seldom... almost never, considered as a potential source of overunity - for the reasons stated before, when perhaps it should be. > > First, as to your contention about electrolysis overunity. Here is one of many references, several of which are available on lenr-canr.org: > ON CURRENT DENSITY AND EXCESS POWER DENSITY IN ELECTROLYSIS EXPERIMENTS by Dan Chicea (paper presented at ICCF9) > http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/ChiceaDoncurrentd.pdf > > As you probably know, Chicea is an associate of George Miley. GM helped him with this study and presumably accepted the accuracy of the results. Without the shadow of Miley, one might be inclined to discount the importance of these findings. Well Jones, a casual examination of the method and data reveals several serious errors. First, the equation used to apply the calibration is forced to go through zero. I seldom observe a calibration equation passing through zero especially when an isoperibolic calorimeter is used. Second, Dan notes that the cell was air cooled and that variation in room temperature caused an artifact for which a correction had to be applied. Third, such a cell can not be calibrated using an internal resistor, which they used without revealing this fact in the paper. From what I know of the methods used by Miley when this work was done, I have a hard time believing the results. However, better studies of heat being produce by a H2O cell have been published. Nevertheless, this heat producing environment has not been studied with sufficient care to reach any firm conclusion. Too many of the few calorimetric measurements have obvious errors. The D2O environment has been studied with much more care. > > > Here is one of many clear reports of excess power from electrolysis which cannot be due to D+D "cold fusion." If you look at the chart of the excess power, i.e. the " f ratio" it is the number that describes the experiment in respect to the excess power which was achieved with all of the combinations tried: the highest f ratios value in the 10 experiments described in this work is surprising. But basically the offshoot is that light water and Ni cathodes gives better results than Pd/deuterium in similar controlled experiments, which eliminates cold fusion as the major source of excess energy. This doesn't mean that CF is not happening at all, only that it is not always a major source of excess energy, and could conceivably be endothermic, that is: if a substantial contributor to the excess is found elsewhere. We now know that transmutation reactions occur in a H2O cell which will produce some nuclear heat. So far, no one has shown a careful quantitative relationship between the amount of transmutation and the amount of heat, Miley not withstanding. > > > The second point relates to the small thermodynamic imbalance in electrolysis, and I mentioned this several months ago: It has been consistently shown that voltage of 1.24 Volts is the threshold potential necessary to separate hydrogen from oxygen in pure water at 77° Fahrenheit (F) and 14.7 pounds per square inch pressure [25° Celsius (C) and 1.03 kilograms (kg) per centimeter ^2.] This is less that the thermodynamic balance of 1.4 eV which is what one finds in physics textbooks. The voltage of 1.44 V is not the real voltage required to separate water, but it is the heat of dissociation expressed in volts. When expressed this way, the energy lost by H2 and O2 leaving the cell can be easily calculated using a simple equation. The real voltage depends on the hydrogen and oxygen activities. A voltage of 1.44 V is expected only when the hydrogen activity at the cathode surface is unity and the oxygen activity at the anode surface is unity. These activities are seldom realized, hence the observed voltage is different from 1.44 V. When you quote such values, you need to consider the total thermodynamic package. > > > This 1.24 is the end of a "Boltzmann's tail" distribution, and it has heretofore been very difficult to exploit that small one-sixth of an eV per molecule due to the low reaction cross-section at 1.24 volts when using solid electrodes.....However, using gaseous virtual electrodes, you can do it over-and-over again sequentially at high probability because you can get the complete field strength of 1.24 which is available at the angstrom spacing of appropriate ions. If you set up a situation where the same water molecules is split-recombined-split-recombined-etc on a nanosecond time scale, so that you can get a "free" 1 eV with every 6 iterations when there are no losses, then this method can result in substantial chemical overunity in a chain reaction. Here, Jones, you are entering the world of speculation. Of course, various mechanisms can be proposed to extract energy from the Boltzman distribution, many of which have been explored. However, as far as I know the anomalies that can be produced are small and do not represent any violation of current thinking. > > > The third point relates to the paradigm shift of a "chemical chain reaction" replacing any need to invoke LENR to explain excess heat. The chemical chain reaction was described in the previous citation and probably requires a slight charge imbalance from free electrons, as Fred Sparber suggested. Fred and I have speculated earlier that this same mechanism may supply about a third of the enormous energy found in hurricanes. In a complex process such as a hurricane, many conventional mechanisms can operate, yet be overlooked as to their magnitude. For example, the energy used to break water into nanosized droplets and its recombination elsewhere can generate apparent energy in local regions that is hard to evaluate. I would feel more confident of a new energy source if you could suggest an experiment that isolates this proposed source from conventional possibilities. > > > > "Are you saying that a source of energy separate from that obtained from the observed nuclear reactions is available when water is electrolyzed?" > > Almost. I am saying that this is a distinct possibility - one that has yet to be eliminated. In fact, the so-called nuclear reactions of CF are so extremely different from those of normal physics, except for the ash, that they could even be endothermic - we just don't know. I think it safe to assume that the reactions cannot be endothermic. The mechanism is not all that unique. A solid lattice has many ways to influence the Coulomb barrier as many imaginative theoreticians have demonstrated. It is very hard to find a mechanism that can assemble several MeV and place it at the location of a nuclear process at exactly the time this process occurs. > > > > "Mills claims one other source and the Correas (Mallove) claim a third source. Are your suggesting a fourth source?" > > Actually, if the hypothesis of a "bare proton" stimulus being the single common denominator in all of these is correct, then there may be only that single source. This stimulus specifically exists in the normally rare situation where a bare proton is forced to stay bare for a long enough time span, and often enough sequentially, to attract whatever mass-energy is available from whatever extra-dimensional source. One really need not get more specific about the "real" source of excess energy than that. Bare protons have been made and maintained in this state for "long" times in accelerators and cyclotrons, yet no evidence of anomalous behavior has been reported. These bare protons last far longer in this state using these devices than when they are in a solid lattice. In fact, the proton is not bare in PdD but has an effective charge of about 0.25 ev. Even when moving in the lattice, electromigration studies show that the proton is not bare. It is only bare in a plasma or in an ion beam. Consequently, your mechanism applies more to hot fusion than to cold fusion. > > > When comparing explanations, and without high energy photons as corroborating evidence, then any so-called "nuclear" reactions, cold, warm or whatever, are no more probable or likely than an extra-dimensional source. You can put the tag of ZPE on that if you like. As I opined before, the bare proton seems to be the key to overunity, and it may operate like an extradimensional antenna. Maybe the true source of excess energy being captured is the ubiquitous 21 cm. wavelength "background" radiation that bathes our universe. Yes, that particular source is very faint in our 3-space, but if a "bare proton" does indeed turn out to be this kind of 4-space gateway, then we may find that the 21 cm background is actually intense in a higher dimension. There is just not enough information available to make a more specific guess. > > > With the upcoming reviews of the cold fusion field, if it is to be truly thorough... well, it might be prudent for anyone who might offer advice to DoE to at least have all the possible bases covered, at least mentally, as I suspect that some of those involved, if they are thorough enough, will scour all the possibilities - such as by asking "how do you know where the excess energy is coming from"? IMHO, to answer that it "must be cold fusion because we found helium..." may not suffice... I suggest it would be a mistake to ask the DoE to evaluate various proposed mechanisms. This is hard enough for scientists in the field to do. We just want them to acknowledge that an anomalous phenomenon exists, no more. Ed > > > Regards, > > Jones From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Thu Mar 25 19:43:01 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2Q3gixu005893; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 19:42:45 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2Q3ghwt005876; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 19:42:43 -0800 Resent-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 19:42:43 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <020001c412e4$62ebcac0$6401a8c0 Craig> From: "SnowDog" To: References: <001601c41257$ebe00b80$c864a8c0@win98> <002601c41267$330036c0$c864a8c0@win98> <200403251203.30804.rockcast@earthlink.net> <00bc01c412d0$0d0140e0$6401a8c0@Craig> Subject: Re: Life On Ice Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 21:42:38 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53717 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: I just made another 3D image. This one's a lot better. It definitely looks like a crystal to me. Maybe ice. (Red on Left Eye) http://www.golddirectory.com/mars/mars.htm Craig Haynie From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Mar 26 01:22:06 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2Q9M2Ix007029; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 01:22:02 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2Q9LnXV006987; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 01:21:49 -0800 Resent-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 01:21:49 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <002a01c41314$4ef6fe60$c864a8c0 win98> From: To: References: <001601c41257$ebe00b80$c864a8c0@win98> <002601c41267$330036c0$c864a8c0@win98> <200403251203.30804.rockcast@earthlink.net> <00bc01c412d0$0d0140e0$6401a8c0@Craig> Subject: Re: Life On Ice Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 11:24:50 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Resent-Message-ID: <_yGR_D.A.DtB.tY_YAB ultra6.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53718 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Craig Haynie wrote: > Hmm... The first image has to go to the left, and the second to the right. I > think you had the images reversed. Yes, of course, I am not able to separate my eyes like frogs, but I can cross it, this is little uneasing I know, maybe I exercise to lock my eyes L to L and R to R, more conventionally:) Brain is a great image processor. It can even produce 3D vision using incompatible left and right images, i.e. one bigger and other smaller, little titled, contrast difference and one image out of focus does not stop it to create 3d pictures, Only when I tried totally incompatibe images and force me to combine it, brain really screw-up and then I understand it is not possible there is a problem :) > > I made a 3D image from the two, and if you use the red lens for the left > eye, I think it does look like ice -- maybe. > > Check it out, if you have 3D glasses. > > http://www.golddirectory.com/mars/mars.htm Unfortunetly, I have not. Do you see a dept of the background shades? One thing I did not understand yet, is grinding is made or not. This is because in image 2M133386649EFF2232P2977M2M1.JPG , the brigt spot, appear as a protrusion lies on the cleaned area, if there would be a grinding this wouldn't be cut? > Sincerely, > > Craig Haynie (Houston) > Regards, hamdi ucar From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Mar 26 01:27:20 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2Q9RCIx008019; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 01:27:13 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2Q9RCal008007; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 01:27:12 -0800 Resent-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 01:27:12 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 03:28:09 -0600 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: thomas malloy Subject: Thoughts on C F and Parksie Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-DCC-CPI-Metrics: Clear 1161; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 Resent-Message-ID: <1l2qEC.A.D9B.wd_YAB ultra6.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53719 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Horace Heffner posted; Perhaps I'm too short sighted, but seems to me that the best that can be hoped for is an educated press. However, who can say for sure? I can't. One thing on the horizon that might make the public actually take notice is $4.00 a gallon gasoline. However, there cannot be any doubt that one of the best things to happen for the CF field is LENR-CANR.org. Getting the evidence out there is having an effect. For your success with LENR-CANR.org I say Bravo! IMHO, if someone had succeeded in producing an engine which produced usable power, this matter would have been settled. OTHO, radio nuclides have been remediated, and DOE has ignored it. There is no question that the anamolious isotopic ratios are artifactual, indicating either separation or transmutation. What was it that Parksie said, "I don't care about your isotopic ratios"? From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Mar 26 01:27:23 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2Q9RIIx008096; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 01:27:18 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2Q9RH5Q008078; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 01:27:17 -0800 Resent-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 01:27:17 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <2.2.32.20040325103552.006d6e44 pop.freeserve.net> References: <2.2.32.20040325103552.006d6e44 pop.freeserve.net> Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 03:28:09 -0600 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: thomas malloy Subject: Re: Park's brain may fall out! NRL report cont. Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-DCC-CPI-Metrics: Clear 1161; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53721 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: > > >the taskmasters, will be drowned by torrents of truth as the sea closes in >>on them and the ex-slaves make it -eventually - to the Promised Land. >> >> - Gene Mallove > >That is delicious 8-) > >FG The idea of seeing Parksie leading the charge into the Red Sea in his gold wheeled Chariot, at the head of an army of academics grown fat on the $150,000,000,000 in federal research money, and then seeing the water cover them, yes!! Gives new meaning to the word delicious. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Mar 26 01:27:24 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2Q9R9xu011629; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 01:27:10 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2Q9R8Hb011620; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 01:27:08 -0800 Resent-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 01:27:08 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 03:28:09 -0600 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: thomas malloy Subject: Fractal Antenna Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-DCC-CPI-Metrics: Clear 1161; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53720 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: I spent an hour looking over the site. I'm wondering how some thing like this could work and what it's operation says about the nature of electromagnetism. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Mar 26 06:39:40 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2QEdWIx012009; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 06:39:33 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2QEdQsV011973; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 06:39:26 -0800 Resent-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 06:39:26 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <001601c41340$1a240760$8545ccd1 MIKEBY3NR533HT> From: "Mike Carrell" To: References: Subject: Re: Thoughts on C F and Parksie Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 09:39:07 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53722 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Thomas Malloy wrote: > > IMHO, if someone had succeeded in producing an engine which produced > usable power, this matter would have been settled. OTHO, radio > nuclides have been remediated, and DOE has ignored it. How do you mean 'ignored'? The process that I know of falls within the window of conventional physics, so nothing to get excited about, but also involves high cost, high energy equipment so that while remediation can be accomplished on a small scale, using that approach to remediate tons of radioactive material is not as cheap as burying it, as expensive and unpleasant as that might be. Remediation by a CF process has been hinted at, but approaches advanced so far do not seem to have survived close analysis. That does not mean that a LENR remediation process will not be developed. Many, many things can happen if a paradigm shift occurs and well funded groups learn how to work in the LENR world. There is no > question that the anomalous isotopic ratios are artifactual, > indicating either separation or transmutation. What was it that > Parksie said, "I don't care about your isotopic ratios"? Yes, they are artifactual, but like other hints will not be taken seriously until the whole issue of an existence proof is accepted. My understanding of the approach taken by those presenting to the new panel will be the minimal one of getting an official endorsement that the world of LENR constitutes "science" and thereby merits routine consideration instead of routine rejection. Thereafter "scientists" can apply for grants, get papers accepted by mainline journals, etc. without threatening their careers. Young scientists could then afford to study the field without wrecking their careers. The Patent Office might even stop automatically rejecting CF patent applications. If that happens, then we might see CF engines emerge from the shadows. Mike Carrell > > > > > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Mar 26 06:42:49 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2QEgcIx012754; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 06:42:41 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2QEgc06012740; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 06:42:38 -0800 Resent-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 06:42:38 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-Id: <6.0.3.0.2.20040326092618.01cdfba0 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell mindspring.com@pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.3.0 Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 09:42:28 -0500 To: vortex-L eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: Comments by Decker at DoE are promising Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53723 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Now that I have had a chance to think about it, I realize these comments by Decker at the DOE are promising. An official at a government agency does not write flippant messages to a New York Times reporter. He must have thought about his words carefully. He may have cleared them with his boss. He must realize that he will be inviting attacks by Park and others. There were 3,082 downloads at LENR-CANR.org yesterday, the second-highest daily total on record. I assume these were caused by the New York Times. The number of accesses from search tools such as Google was higher than normal, but not extraordinarily high. This means there were not large numbers of people new to the field coming in on their own. It suggests that groups of people were discussing cold fusion in response to the New York Times, probably by e-mail, and several of them mentioned our web site and suggested to their friends that they have a look at it. (When someone discusses LENR-CANR.org in an online discussion group or on a web page, and includes a hyperlink to it, I can often track down the hyperlink and find their comments.) I did notice unusually high activity in the library indices, indicating that many people were looking up authors. Most of the time, readers know what they are looking for, and they download papers directly without ever looking at the HTML screens. The article quoted a professor of plasma fusion, Dr. Stewart Prager, who said he has not heard anything about cold fusion. I found him and asked him a brief, friendly message inviting them to look at LENR-CANR.org. He responded: "Thank you for the information. Much appreciated, Stewart Prager." That is another straw in the wind. In the past, I have probably contacted 50 to 100 professors and I do not recall that more than one or two acknowledged the message, and none said thank you. I posted the following description of the DOE panel on the Features page at LENR-CANR.org: Upcoming DoE review of cold fusion After ICCF-10, several leading cold fusion researchers contacted the US Department of Energy and asked them to set up a review panel to examine cold fusion results and determine whether cold fusion research should be funded. The DOE has agreed to convene a panel. The members have not been selected yet. The DOE first looked at cold fusion in 1989, in the ERAB report. The panel was convened soon after cold fusion was announced, and it finished its work several months before the first serious cold fusion application experiments were completed, and a year or two before they could be published. The ERAB report concluded that cold fusion probably does not exist, but that some funding might be appropriate. Despite this, funding was cut off and the report was cited as justification for this decision. The New Scientist magazine broke the news of this new panel in the March 20, 2004 issue, in a short article by Ben Daviss, "Upfront: News in perspective" on page 6. On March 25, 2004, the New York Times published an article titled, "U.S. Will Give Cold Fusion Second Look, After 15 Years," by Kenneth Chang. Chang conducted an e-mail interview with Dr. James F. Decker, deputy director of the science office in the Energy Department. Drecker confirmed that the panel is being formed, and he wrote: "It was my personal judgment that their request for a review was reasonable." On November 6, 2003, Decker met with Peter Hagelstein (MIT); Michael McKubre (SRI International), and David J. Nagel (George Washington University). Decker said, "They presented some data and asked for a review of the scientific research that has been conducted. The scientists who came to see me are from excellent scientific institutions and have excellent credentials." - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Mar 26 07:39:12 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2QFcvxu027900; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 07:38:57 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2QFckrZ027847; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 07:38:46 -0800 Resent-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 07:38:46 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-Id: <6.0.3.0.2.20040326100412.01cdfc00 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell mindspring.com@pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.3.0 Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 10:21:08 -0500 To: vortex-L eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: How and why public support for CF may help Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: <2oG9B.A.9yG.G6EZAB ultra5.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53724 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: Horace Heffner writes: > >nature of the results played a role, but most of the violent rejection has > >been caused by m-o-n-e-y. > > Yes, so true, and it may even have been true that a lot of money thrown at > cold fusion in 1989 could have been wasted. Especially in the Japanese NEDO program. > There was indeed some > justification for holding off on funding I think . . . I agree there was justification for keeping funding at a modest level. A few million dollars a year would have been appropriate. A $100 million crash program starting in 1989 would have been a disaster. It would have been a shark feeding frenzy, leaving nothing but blood on the water. > I would be surprised in the extreme if cold fusion became a significant > public issue. It is simply not an election buster. It will not decide any elections, because both parties have neglected CF. I did not mean to suggest that CF must reach the front page of every newspaper before any progress is made. We do not need to win the war in a single afternoon. If there is modest government funding, and considerably more academic and corporate funding, progress will be rapid. This does not require that every skeptic be silenced. Later, if anything like a practical device emerges from the laboratory, cold fusion will be on the front page of every newspaper, and the skeptics will be silenced forever. When I say that public support is needed, I do not mean we need overwhelming public support, and millions of people writing to their congressmen before we get funding for a single experiment. I quoted the British expert Beaver from 1955, when the first modern air pollution reduction programs began. Beaver said that no progress had been made previously because the public did not demand action. Once the public came on board, legal reforms, R&D, and other progress became inevitable. However, that does not mean that all air pollution problems were solved by 1956. England still has serious air pollution. If the public demands research in cold fusion, progress will be inevitable, but that does not mean the technical problems will be solved, or practical devices will be developed, and it certainly does not mean the skeptics will shut up. The public demands serious, expensive research in cancer and AIDS, but so far the these diseases have not been cured. Future events may resemble those surrounding Judah Folkman and his angiogenesis theory of cancer formation. He has been working on this since the 1960s. A few years ago, the New York Times in many other newspapers reported that he had achieved success in that other laboratories were trying to replicate him. This was followed months later by announcements that the other laboratories had failed to replicate, and many experts doubted his results. Some denounced him. Then the news was dropped from the papers, and as far as the casual reader would know, that was the end of Folkman and his theory. However, if you take a little deeper, you find that in the end he was replicated and progress is apparently being made. In other words, the victory was quiet and behind the scenes and it has not yet reached the public. Cold fusion cannot follow this path exactly, because there will be no replication experiments and no publication until the public takes some interests and demands at least some action. > notice is $4.00 a gallon gasoline. However, there cannot be any doubt that > one of the best things to happen for the CF field is LENR-CANR.org. Thank you, but as far as I know it has not actually accomplished anything yet. There is still no funding, and the level of public awareness remains microscopic. - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Mar 26 10:21:18 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2QIL7nX012244; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 10:21:07 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2QIL5rl012221; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 10:21:05 -0800 Resent-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 10:21:05 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 09:27:03 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: Life On Ice Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53725 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Craig Haynie has very graciously posted a 3D image of the subject "Life On Ice" as the 3rd photo on page: It can also be referenced directly as: This is a 3D image I composited, using GIMP, from two Spirit Sol 79 microscopic photos from JPL. The perspective arises from differing camera elevations above the ice, not lateral camera displacement, so the 3D effect shows up in a radial fashion, not throughout the photo uniformly. For this reason I rotated the image 90 degrees so that some of the more interesting items show up clearly when the left eye has a red filter and the right eye blue-green, the typical 3D glasses orientation. Some features are best viewed after rotating the image further, or by rotating the head. The striking thing is that surface items and subsurface items can be clearly distinguished right next to each other in various places. The resulting apparent differing depths can not then be merely due to an illusion from image superposition, but rather must be due to real geometrical differences in the object space. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Mar 26 10:48:38 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2QImRg5011567; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 10:48:27 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2QImLiQ011547; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 10:48:21 -0800 Resent-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 10:48:21 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 09:54:18 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Ice field lichen Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53726 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Opportuntity is taking some great photos of the "matchstick lichen" and decomposing fruiting bodies now that it is out of eagle crater and out on the ice field surface. marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/m/059/1M133421584EFF0830P2977M2M1.JPG There are lots of places where long strands of the stuff can be seen laying on the surface. It seems larger or more mature than the stuff in Eagle crater. It must grow better out where there are more hours of sun? Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Mar 26 11:22:34 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2QJMSg5020635; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 11:22:28 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2QJMRrm020624; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 11:22:27 -0800 Resent-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 11:22:27 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <002701c41368$3e613120$c864a8c0 win98> From: To: References: <001601c41257$ebe00b80$c864a8c0@win98> <002601c41267$330036c0$c864a8c0@win98> <200403251203.30804.rockcast@earthlink.net> <00bc01c412d0$0d0140e0$6401a8c0@Craig> <020001c412e4$62ebcac0$6401a8c0@Craig> Subject: Re: Life On Ice Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 21:26:13 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53727 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: A friend said that water ice could not survive to much above cryogenic temperature. Could this be a giant NaCl crystal? There are too much clues that is a transparent or translucent and soft material having glassy surface. What could be otherwise? Despite the depth appearance of individual images, using a stereographic arrangement I am not able to obtain depth view of background shades, despite the foreground protrusions and cracks appears as 3D. Graphical analysis also confirm there is no depth on shades, the out of focus appearance of background shades does not change or correct on subsequent picture taken closer distance also. How this illusion is made? Maybe the grassy material is translucent and muddy. Oh I think I found something now! If the material make fuzzy the things inside, there would be no precise reference points visible to obtain 3D visualization and graphical analysis. So I looked to large dark patches having no distinct contours. Et voila! They are different in pictures marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/m/079/2M133386244EFF2232P2957M2M1.JPG and marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/m/079/2M133386588EFF2232P2957M2M1.JPG If these dark patches are on the surface, they would not change, where the camera moved, but if they are deep in the material, does. Still I am be wrong in this observation, so help of Horace or Craig is needed. Result: Material is translucent (not like clear ice) and have a limited penetration width like some muddy mix. Small shades should be very close to the surface, so they gave no depth view. So the material could be composed by two layers after cleaned by the RAT. Surface layer is muddy and translucent, deeper layer more clean. Regards, hamdi ucar ----- Original Message ----- From: "SnowDog" To: Sent: 26 March 2004 05:42 Subject: Re: Life On Ice > I just made another 3D image. This one's a lot better. It definitely looks > like a crystal to me. Maybe ice. (Red on Left Eye) > > http://www.golddirectory.com/mars/mars.htm > > Craig Haynie Regards, hamdi ucar From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Mar 26 11:25:49 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2QJPig5021520; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 11:25:45 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2QJPhsx021504; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 11:25:43 -0800 Resent-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 11:25:43 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net (Unverified) Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 10:31:52 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: Life On Ice Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53728 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: I goofed again. The 3D photo I compositied can also be referenced directly as: Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Mar 26 11:35:12 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2QJZ7g5023937; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 11:35:07 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2QJZ6x1023923; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 11:35:06 -0800 Resent-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 11:35:06 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 10:41:12 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: Life On Ice Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53729 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 9:26 PM 3/26/4, wrote: [snip] > So I looked to large dark patches having no distinct >contours. Et voila! They are different in pictures >marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/m/079/2M133386244EFF2232P2957M2M1.JPG >and >marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/m/079/2M133386588EFF2232P2957M2M1.JPG > >If these dark patches are on the surface, they would not change, where the >camera moved, but if they are deep in the material, does. Still I am be >wrong in >this observation, so help of Horace or Craig is needed. Looks to me like your are right. The depth of the fuzzy stuff is actually very clear in a 3D red-green composite photo viewed with 3D glasses. Even though it is fuzzy, it is consistently fuzzy, and the color separation is much more and the eye sees it as depth. Even without 3D glasses you can see the depth via the relative color separation distances in the following: Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Mar 26 12:44:25 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2QKiIf7013123; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 12:44:18 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2QKiGVs013103; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 12:44:16 -0800 Resent-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 12:44:16 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <019d01c41372$ec4a2c60$8837fea9 cpq> From: "Jones Beene" To: "vortex" References: <00df01c410cc$c82a3a80$8680b341 computer> <001d01c411d3$d0e42200$8837fea9@cpq> <40632085.4CD86E95@ix.netcom.com> <001301c412a6$a2e675a0$8837fea9@cpq> <40639D9F.118703C5@ix.netcom.com> Subject: Re: Superoxide Anions and Over-Unity Electrolysis Cells? Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 12:42:57 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ultra5.eskimo.com id i2QKiDf7013083 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53730 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Hi Ed, I can see that you still have not budged far from the mind-set that cold fusion cannot be anything less than real fusion, although now you seem to be a little more open to the prospect of the hydrino. Yes - you may be ultimately proven correct in that conviction (and honestly I hope that you are)... but even if you are, the actual evidence in place now does not warrant it nor does any experiment out there logically lead to your conclusion - so you are really in no better position than any bettor 'playing a hunch.' Looking at the same plethora of studies over the past 14 years as you have, others who do accept the validity of 'excess heat' can nevertheless be in the position of not believing that fusion is involved - nor any of the explanations or theories that have yet been devised to explain the situation, even that of Mills. It is a trap that many observers fall into - that is, to think that when one accepts the experimental findings for an anomaly from the work of a respected researcher, that one must also accept the theory that the experimenter says that he was basing his work on. When one desires to invoke the "fusion" explanation but can find no high energy photons (which cannot be hidden if they were there) and which are the only unambiguous characteristic of fusion reactions, then there is a real problem that just will not go away on its own. That lack of gammas should - in and of itself - send the theorist all the way back to 'square one'. Instead, they have more often than not, proceeded onward to concoct even more fantastic rationalizations for the deficiency while steadfastly retaining a firm grip on the 'panacea' of fusion. That lack of the clear indicia of fusion, at least in the minds of some of us, is fatal to the entire logic of the explanation - even when transmutation and ash are found. Transmutation of electrodes, or helium ash, etc are not unambiguous - they do NOT necessarily imply fusion unless there are high energy photons as well. It is just as logical, even more logical, to assume that when excess heat is found along side of transmutation or fusion ash, then whatever unknown mechanism provided the excess heat, also provided the transmutation or ash as a side effect, even provided it endothermically, and not the other way around. For instance, if one believed in 'redundant ground state' deuteron shrinkage, which is the point that Mike was making whether you realized it or not, then the excess heat will be provided by the angular momentum of the deuteron's electron in the process of shrinking down to the level that it will eventually either fuse or shed the neutron, which will then be absorbed and later cause an alpha release from the matrix, along with the transmutation. NOTE that both helium, transmutation and excess heat can all occur in this scenario without the necessity of invoking fusion (as the alpha release is a decay reaction, not a fusion reaction). I am just trying to present all sides of an issue, hopefully in pursuit of scientific truth. Actually I think it is possible to consider that the scenario above, involving the hydrino is itself overly complex. In the case where you have the three variables: excess heat, helium, and transmutation of electrodes, the alternative simplest explanation for all of this is chemical overunity caused by proton metastability, with transmutation and alpha release being caused by the same persistent overmodulation of the field that caused the chemical OU. Until that possibility has been eliminated, it is not logical IMHO to proceed to either the fusion explanation or the hydrino explanation, except in the interest of expediency. But, of course, there is also your 'educated guess' and/or that of R. Mills, either of which may turn out to be correct, and let's hope for vanity's sake that fusion is proven to somehow occur in electrolysis without gammas - but until that time, I think it prudent that some of us (who accept the findings of excess heat and are not skeptics of CF or the hydrino), continue to look diligently for other explanations. > E.S. "I think it safe to assume that the [cold fusion] reactions cannot be endothermic. The mechanism is not all that unique." Really? Then where - in all of physics - is nuclear fusion found WITHOUT high energy photons? Where else are large megavolt/atom exotherms found without secondary gammas? Yet I can show you plenty of evidence for endothermic nuclear reactions. If you drove your car today, then every ounce of iron in that car was the result of an endothermic nuclear reaction. > E.S. "Bare protons have been made and maintained in this state for "long" times in accelerators and cyclotrons, yet no evidence of anomalous behavior has been reported." This is simply not true. Anomalies have been reported with bare protons since Lawrence built his first little cyclotron tube "out of brass and sealing wax" in late 1930. The problem is that the energy used to strip the H2 has, in the past, been overwhelming compared to the energy that can theoretically be cohered by the bare proton... therefore, finding anomalies is only possible at the low end of the power scale. Even Lawrence's first tube was 80 kV. For instance, if it turned out that the bare proton was cohering 21 cm background radiation through a 4-space interface (an interface where that 21 cm radiation was much more intense then in our 3-space) - it is still only fractional eV radiation - which is miniscule compared to the thousand or so volts often used to strip the H2. So how could it show up unless you were looking for it, or unless you provided an extended time frame in which to 'pump' the fractional eV to a fair proportion of your stripping voltage, or unless you provide a low input method for keeping the proton bare? Protons entering storage rings already have many megavolts of mass-energy so a fractional eV periodic kick is not going to be very obvious for hours or weeks. Whenever bare proton anomalies have been looked for specifically in lower energy discharges, as in the case of Alexander Chernetski, they seem to have been found. And even if you don't buy the Chicea/Miley's findings, what about Dash, Bush, Eagleton, Mitsubishi etc? They found light water electrolysis overunity as has Violante and a number of Italian and Japanese investigators? Their success IMHO can be attributed just as easily to a chemical OU "bare proton" explanation as to the hydrino... and either of those two makes more sense than real fusion since there were no deuterons and no gammas. Again, I hope you are correct, Ed, but please don't assume that the issue is even close to being resolved and that it won't end up being a major sticking point, when and if DoE gets that far. Jones The most wasting but joyful of all human follies is to believe passionately in the palpably true, but tangibly not-yet-true. It is the chief preoccupation of mankind. -- with apologies to H.L. Mencken From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Mar 26 13:27:13 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2QLR7f7023495; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 13:27:08 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2QLR67B023474; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 13:27:06 -0800 Resent-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 13:27:06 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <000c01c41379$a9165480$c864a8c0 win98> From: To: References: Subject: Re: Life On Ice Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 23:30:49 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53731 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Horace, I prepared two images for stereographic view from images marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/m/079/2M133386588EFF2232P2957M2M1.JPG and marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/m/079/2M133386244EFF2232P2957M2M1.JPG I modified the geometry of the first image by resizing it W=1036 ,H=1015 and rotating it CCW by 0.9 degree to compensate original camera angle differences. Then I take the common area and saved to web site http://orchestra.webhostme.com/images/image1.jpg and http://orchestra.webhostme.com/images/image2.jpg Images are nearly identical now. I would like you take these images and obtain a composed 3D image and check it. I checked their 3D properties by my traditional eye crossing method, and found very clean and better 3D visualization than the original images. As I said earlier, 3D features are only at foreground protrusion and around the crack. Regards, hamdi ucar ----- Original Message ----- From: "Horace Heffner" To: Sent: 26 March 2004 20:27 Subject: Re: Life On Ice > Craig Haynie has very graciously posted a 3D image of the subject "Life On > Ice" as the 3rd photo on page: > > > > It can also be referenced directly as: > > > > This is a 3D image I composited, using GIMP, from two Spirit Sol 79 > microscopic photos from JPL. The perspective arises from differing camera > elevations above the ice, not lateral camera displacement, so the 3D effect > shows up in a radial fashion, not throughout the photo uniformly. For this > reason I rotated the image 90 degrees so that some of the more interesting > items show up clearly when the left eye has a red filter and the right eye > blue-green, the typical 3D glasses orientation. Some features are best > viewed after rotating the image further, or by rotating the head. > > The striking thing is that surface items and subsurface items can be > clearly distinguished right next to each other in various places. The > resulting apparent differing depths can not then be merely due to an > illusion from image superposition, but rather must be due to real > geometrical differences in the object space. > > Regards, > > Horace Heffner > > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Mar 26 14:25:19 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2QMPEg8028858; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 14:25:14 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2QMP9hk028839; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 14:25:09 -0800 Resent-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 14:25:09 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <000401c41381$c5798180$c864a8c0 win98> From: To: References: <000c01c41379$a9165480$c864a8c0@win98> Subject: Re: Life On Ice Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 00:29:03 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Resent-Message-ID: <3jX_yD.A.hCH.F3KZAB ultra6.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53732 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Finally found a transparent depth on this material! This not on the clean area but below the crack. I switched between two images repeatedly and when the background shades become aligned, surface dust moves. I had noted the surface below the crack was not smooth earlier. It appears the "rock" have many layers. the Upper layer on this image is a transparent thin layer having some dust particles attached. This layer is bumpy. Below this layer is the muddy opaque or semi opaque layer where the shades take places. This layer have flat upper surface. Actually it is exposed above the crack. Small protrusion above the crack appears not part of the layer but attached to the layer and possibly detached by the force of the RAT without grinding. Still I do not understand how RAT exposed these glassy layer without scratching it. ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Sent: 26 March 2004 23:30 Subject: Re: Life On Ice > Horace, > I prepared two images for stereographic view from images > marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/m/079/2M133386588EFF2232P2957M2M1.JPG > and > marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/m/079/2M133386244EFF2232P2957M2M1.JPG > > I modified the geometry of the first image by resizing it W=1036 ,H=1015 and > rotating it > CCW by 0.9 degree to compensate original camera angle differences. Then I take > the common area and saved to web site > http://orchestra.webhostme.com/images/image1.jpg > and > http://orchestra.webhostme.com/images/image2.jpg > > Images are nearly identical now. I would like you take these images and obtain a > composed 3D image and check it. > > I checked their 3D properties by my traditional eye crossing method, and found > very clean and better 3D visualization than the original images. As I said > earlier, 3D features are only at foreground protrusion and around the crack. Regards, hamdi ucar From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Mar 26 14:37:40 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2QMbZg8031839; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 14:37:35 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2QMbYAt031828; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 14:37:34 -0800 Resent-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 14:37:34 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f From: Erikbaard aol.com Message-ID: <30.5289c831.2d960aaa aol.com> Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 17:37:30 EST Subject: What's New blackout? To: vortex-l eskimo.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_30.5289c831.2d960aaa_boundary" X-Mailer: 8.0 for Windows sub 6024 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53733 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: --part1_30.5289c831.2d960aaa_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi All - When for the last couple of weeks the DOE policy shift was just rumored, I didn't expect any mention from Robert Park in his weekly column. But now even the Times has picked it up -- still nothing. Has he decided that ignoring Cold Fusion will make it go away? Best regards, Erik Baard --part1_30.5289c831.2d960aaa_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi All -

When for the last couple of weeks the DOE policy shift was just rumored, I d= idn't expect any mention from Robert Park in his weekly column.  But no= w even the Times has picked it up -- still nothing.  Has he decided tha= t ignoring Cold Fusion will make it go away?

Best regards,

Erik Baard
--part1_30.5289c831.2d960aaa_boundary-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Mar 26 14:47:55 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2QMlgf7009973; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 14:47:43 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2QMlcGU009936; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 14:47:38 -0800 Resent-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 14:47:38 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <4064B3E2.BE11AB30 ix.netcom.com> Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 14:51:15 -0800 From: Edmund Storms Organization: Energy K System X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77C-CCK-MCD {C-UDP; EBM-APPLE} (Macintosh; U; PPC) X-Accept-Language: en,pdf MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Superoxide Anions and Over-Unity Electrolysis Cells? References: <00df01c410cc$c82a3a80$8680b341 computer> <001d01c411d3$d0e42200$8837fea9@cpq> <40632085.4CD86E95@ix.netcom.com> <001301c412a6$a2e675a0$8837fea9@cpq> <40639D9F.118703C5@ix.netcom.com> <019d01c41372$ec4a2c60$8837fea9@cpq> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53734 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Jones Beene wrote: > Hi Ed, > > I can see that you still have not budged far from the mind-set that cold fusion cannot be anything less than real fusion, although now you seem to be a little more open to the prospect of the hydrino. Yes - you may be ultimately proven correct in that conviction (and honestly I hope that you are)... but even if you are, the actual evidence in place now does not warrant it nor does any experiment out there logically lead to your conclusion - so you are really in no better position than any bettor 'playing a hunch.' Jones, you seem to ignore that FACT that nuclear products have been found. These products require some of the energy to come from their creation. If additional energy is produced, which has not been demonstrated, then your idea would have value. > > > Looking at the same plethora of studies over the past 14 years as you have, others who do accept the validity of 'excess heat' can nevertheless be in the position of not believing that fusion is involved - nor any of the explanations or theories that have yet been devised to explain the situation, even that of Mills. Once again, the evidence is consistent with a fusion-type reaction. Anyone is free to use their imagination to suggest all kinds of strange reactions as a source of additional energy. So far, evidence is lacking. > > > It is a trap that many observers fall into - that is, to think that when one accepts the experimental findings for an anomaly from the work of a respected researcher, that one must also accept the theory that the experimenter says that he was basing his work on. It is not a theory that He4 is produced, it is not a theory that the measured energy is within a factor of two of being consistent with a fusion reaction, it is not a theory that tritium is produced, and it is not a theory that transmutation reactions are found that must produce energy. However, it is a theory that some, as yet, unidentified source of energy is being tapped. > > > When one desires to invoke the "fusion" explanation but can find no high energy photons (which cannot be hidden if they were there) and which are the only unambiguous characteristic of fusion reactions, then there is a real problem that just will not go away on its own. That lack of gammas should - in and of itself - send the theorist all the way back to 'square one'. Instead, they have more often than not, proceeded onward to concoct even more fantastic rationalizations for the deficiency while steadfastly retaining a firm grip on the 'panacea' of fusion. Here you are making the assumption. High energy emissions are not typical of LENR reactions because the energy is effectively coupled to the lattice. Some energetic particle emission and radiation is detected, presumably from reactions occurring too near the surface to be effectively coupled. This behavior is the essential difference between cold fusion and hot fusion. > > > That lack of the clear indicia of fusion, at least in the minds of some of us, is fatal to the entire logic of the explanation - even when transmutation and ash are found. Transmutation of electrodes, or helium ash, etc are not unambiguous - they do NOT necessarily imply fusion unless there are high energy photons as well. Here you insist on your assumption being correct. I simply look at the data and ask what is the simplest interpretation, without prejudging the outcome. Obviously, the mechanism for He or transmutation production is unique, but this does not affect the end product nor the amount of resulting energy. Energy is produced, He is produced and gamma rays are not produced. Occasionally tritium and neutrons are produced. These observations tell me that a strange kind of fusion is taking place. They obviously tell you that some process other than fusion is occurring, a process for which no supporting observation exists, except for the absence of gamma emission. Seems to me, my data out numbers your data. > > > It is just as logical, even more logical, to assume that when excess heat is found along side of transmutation or fusion ash, then whatever unknown mechanism provided the excess heat, also provided the transmutation or ash as a side effect, even provided it endothermically, and not the other way around. Perhaps logical to you, but not to me. I go for the most simple logical explanation every time. > > > For instance, if one believed in 'redundant ground state' deuteron shrinkage, which is the point that Mike was making whether you realized it or not, then the excess heat will be provided by the angular momentum of the deuteron's electron in the process of shrinking down to the level that it will eventually either fuse or shed the neutron, which will then be absorbed and later cause an alpha release from the matrix, along with the transmutation. NOTE that both helium, transmutation and excess heat can all occur in this scenario without the necessity of invoking fusion (as the alpha release is a decay reaction, not a fusion reaction). I know that people have tried to explain the process. Some of these explanations have their own problems and strange assumptions. Nevertheless, the starting state consists of deuterium and the end state consists of helium and energy. Fusion describes the process. In light of the Iwamura work, the process appears to involve at least 4 deuterons. I'm sure other novel features will be discover to show how the fusion reaction can occur. If you want to propose another kind of reaction, I would welcome some experimental support. > > > I am just trying to present all sides of an issue, hopefully in pursuit of scientific truth. Actually I think it is possible to consider that the scenario above, involving the hydrino is itself overly complex. In the case where you have the three variables: excess heat, helium, and transmutation of electrodes, the alternative simplest explanation for all of this is chemical overunity caused by proton metastability, with transmutation and alpha release being caused by the same persistent overmodulation of the field that caused the chemical OU. Until that possibility has been eliminated, it is not logical IMHO to proceed to either the fusion explanation or the hydrino explanation, except in the interest of expediency. Hydrino involvement has been part of several mechanisms from the beginning. The electron shrinks to produce a dineutron, which by a complex interaction generates He, either as an alpha particle from a heavy atom or by interacting with a deuterium. These mechanisms all are hard to justify because either localized energy and/or a neutrino is required. In addition, the observed energy is too great for the He to result from alpha emission. > > > But, of course, there is also your 'educated guess' and/or that of R. Mills, either of which may turn out to be correct, and let's hope for vanity's sake that fusion is proven to somehow occur in electrolysis without gammas - but until that time, I think it prudent that some of us (who accept the findings of excess heat and are not skeptics of CF or the hydrino), continue to look diligently for other explanations. Knock yourself out. Meanwhile, I'm waiting until the picture becomes clearer before I venture into the theory business. > > > > E.S. "I think it safe to assume that the [cold fusion] reactions cannot be endothermic. The mechanism is not all that unique." > > Really? Then where - in all of physics - is nuclear fusion found WITHOUT high energy photons? Where else are large megavolt/atom exotherms found without secondary gammas? Yet I can show you plenty of evidence for endothermic nuclear reactions. If you drove your car today, then every ounce of iron in that car was the result of an endothermic nuclear reaction. Your examples do not apply. First of all, the absence of energetic radiation is the novel characteristic of LENR. If such radiation were detected, few people would have a problem believing the claims, and many of us would be dead. On the other hand, iron is made in a very energy-rich environment where endothermic reactions are possible. This is not the case of a LENR environment. > > > > E.S. "Bare protons have been made and maintained in this state for "long" times in accelerators and cyclotrons, yet no evidence of anomalous behavior has been reported." > > This is simply not true. Anomalies have been reported with bare protons since Lawrence built his first little cyclotron tube "out of brass and sealing wax" in late 1930. The problem is that the energy used to strip the H2 has, in the past, been overwhelming compared to the energy that can theoretically be cohered by the bare proton... therefore, finding anomalies is only possible at the low end of the power scale. Even Lawrence's first tube was 80 kV. What anomalies are you referring to? When these protons strike a target, is anomalous energy released. As these protons travel through space, do they emit unusual radiation? You need to show some kind of justification for believing that a bare proton has unusual properties. > > > For instance, if it turned out that the bare proton was cohering 21 cm background radiation through a 4-space interface (an interface where that 21 cm radiation was much more intense then in our 3-space) - it is still only fractional eV radiation - which is miniscule compared to the thousand or so volts often used to strip the H2. So how could it show up unless you were looking for it, or unless you provided an extended time frame in which to 'pump' the fractional eV to a fair proportion of your stripping voltage, or unless you provide a low input method for keeping the proton bare? Protons entering storage rings already have many megavolts of mass-energy so a fractional eV periodic kick is not going to be very obvious for hours or weeks. The proton does not start with this high energy nor were all such experiments done using such energies. Has anyone reported unusual energy being generated by bare protons at any time any where? > > > Whenever bare proton anomalies have been looked for specifically in lower energy discharges, as in the case of Alexander Chernetski, they seem to have been found. And even if you don't buy the Chicea/Miley's findings, what about Dash, Bush, Eagleton, Mitsubishi etc? They found light water electrolysis overunity as has Violante and a number of Italian and Japanese investigators? Their success IMHO can be attributed just as easily to a chemical OU "bare proton" explanation as to the hydrino... and either of those two makes more sense than real fusion since there were no deuterons and no gammas. As I said before, the simplest explanation is based on the presence of observed transmutation products. These would not be expected to produce gamma emission. > > > Again, I hope you are correct, Ed, but please don't assume that the issue is even close to being resolved and that it won't end up being a major sticking point, when and if DoE gets that far. I hope the DoE does not try to choose an explanation. That has been the problem all along. People seem to want an explanation instead of looking at what has been observed. I hope the DoE only gives credence to what has been observed. With this support, people will then have the money and support to do the experiments that will eventually result in an explanation. Ed > > > Jones > > The most wasting but joyful of all human follies is to believe passionately in the palpably true, but tangibly not-yet-true. It is the chief preoccupation of mankind. > > -- with apologies to H.L. Mencken From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Mar 26 15:17:12 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2QNH6g8007741; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 15:17:06 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2QNH5RL007719; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 15:17:05 -0800 Resent-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 15:17:05 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <410-220043526221817640 ix.netcom.com> X-Priority: 3 Reply-To: aki ix.netcom.com X-Mailer: EarthLink MailBox 2004.1.42.0 (Windows) From: "Akira Kawasaki" To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: FW: WHAT'S NEW Friday, March 26, 2004 Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 14:18:17 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-ELNK-Trace: c4cc7f5f697e8746f66dc3a06d5924d833f10a6fdd13e499b87420aee7e3946c0cdf93a589ab4c3c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53735 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: > [Original Message] > From: What's New > To: Akira Kawasaki Date: 3/26/2004 1:35:13 PM Subject: WHAT'S NEW Friday, March 26, 2004 WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 26 Mar 04 Washington, DC 1. BUSTED! THE SORDID STORY BEHIND OUR FABRICATED INTERVIEWS. The heat is on. A year ago, when New York Times reporter Jayson Blair was fired for fabricating interviews, we at WN shrugged it off. It's not like it was the first time a reporter made up a story. Washington Post reporter Janet Cooke got a Pulitzer Prize for interviewing people that didn't exist. That was 14 years ago. More recently, Stephen Glass was caught fabricating stories for New Republic. We still didn't take it seriously; nobody reads New Republic anyway. But USA Today is America's most-read paper, and last week, star reporter Jack Kelly was outed for making news up. On top of that, a WN reader googled "veteran NASA astronaut Ann Thropojinic" (WN 12 Mar 04), and came up with zip. Are we about to be exposed? It's time to come clean: WN has fabricated interviews for years. It gives us full control of a story, and it's highly addictive. Having no experience at confession, WN turned to a professional, Mia Culpa, for help. "It's best to be indirect," she mused, "perhaps you could reveal the truth in a whimsical interview with a fictitious expert." Thanks Mia. 2. HUBBLE REPAIR MISSION: "JOHN HENRY WAS A STEEL DRIVIN' MAN." NASA is buried under a blizzard of appeals by people from every walk to save Hubble. The four Hubble repair missions are often invoked as proof of the need for a human presence in space, but NASA Administrator Sean O'Keefe left himself no room to back down from his decision to let Hubble die rather than risk a shuttle repair mission. There is a way out. Why not build a robot that could make the repairs? In principle, a machine can be made to perform any mechanical task. The implications go beyond the beloved telescope. In the end, the machine will always win. It would be an update of the legendary contest between John Henry and the Iron Monster. "And he died with a hammer in his hand." 3. FAKE NEWS: "IN WASHINGTON, I'M KAREN RYAN SIGNING OFF." Eighteen journalism organization have signed a statement asking Health and Human Services to stop using video news releases that imitate television news stories. The Bush Administration had paid people to pose as journalists praising the new Medicare law. 4. ADVERTISING: "WE BRING CLARITY TO COMPEXITY," THE AD CLAIMED. A full page ad for Assurant, Inc. in the New York Times had a colorful picture of a yo-yo, signifying I know not what. It explained it this way: Gravity: Attractive force between bodies proportional to their masses and the distnce between them. THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND. Opinions are the author's and not necessarily shared by the University of Maryland, but they should be. --- Archives of What's New can be found at http://www.aps.org/WN You are currently subscribed to whatsnew as: aki ix.netcom.com To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-whatsnew-47101V lists.apsmsgs.org To subscribe, send a blank e-mail to: From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Mar 26 15:19:07 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2QNIrf7016057; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 15:18:53 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2QNIpUw016035; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 15:18:51 -0800 Resent-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 15:18:51 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <410-220043526221959260 ix.netcom.com> X-Priority: 3 Reply-To: aki ix.netcom.com X-Mailer: EarthLink MailBox 2004.1.42.0 (Windows) From: "Akira Kawasaki" To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: FW: WHAT'S NEW Friday, March 26, 2004 Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 14:19:59 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-ELNK-Trace: c4cc7f5f697e8746f66dc3a06d5924d833f10a6fdd13e499c1c353ab517ece23af78f7fbf31ba7be350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53736 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: > [Original Message] > From: What's New > To: Akira Kawasaki Date: 3/26/2004 1:35:13 PM Subject: WHAT'S NEW Friday, March 26, 2004 WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 26 Mar 04 Washington, DC 1. BUSTED! THE SORDID STORY BEHIND OUR FABRICATED INTERVIEWS. The heat is on. A year ago, when New York Times reporter Jayson Blair was fired for fabricating interviews, we at WN shrugged it off. It's not like it was the first time a reporter made up a story. Washington Post reporter Janet Cooke got a Pulitzer Prize for interviewing people that didn't exist. That was 14 years ago. More recently, Stephen Glass was caught fabricating stories for New Republic. We still didn't take it seriously; nobody reads New Republic anyway. But USA Today is America's most-read paper, and last week, star reporter Jack Kelly was outed for making news up. On top of that, a WN reader googled "veteran NASA astronaut Ann Thropojinic" (WN 12 Mar 04), and came up with zip. Are we about to be exposed? It's time to come clean: WN has fabricated interviews for years. It gives us full control of a story, and it's highly addictive. Having no experience at confession, WN turned to a professional, Mia Culpa, for help. "It's best to be indirect," she mused, "perhaps you could reveal the truth in a whimsical interview with a fictitious expert." Thanks Mia. 2. HUBBLE REPAIR MISSION: "JOHN HENRY WAS A STEEL DRIVIN' MAN." NASA is buried under a blizzard of appeals by people from every walk to save Hubble. The four Hubble repair missions are often invoked as proof of the need for a human presence in space, but NASA Administrator Sean O'Keefe left himself no room to back down from his decision to let Hubble die rather than risk a shuttle repair mission. There is a way out. Why not build a robot that could make the repairs? In principle, a machine can be made to perform any mechanical task. The implications go beyond the beloved telescope. In the end, the machine will always win. It would be an update of the legendary contest between John Henry and the Iron Monster. "And he died with a hammer in his hand." 3. FAKE NEWS: "IN WASHINGTON, I'M KAREN RYAN SIGNING OFF." Eighteen journalism organization have signed a statement asking Health and Human Services to stop using video news releases that imitate television news stories. The Bush Administration had paid people to pose as journalists praising the new Medicare law. 4. ADVERTISING: "WE BRING CLARITY TO COMPEXITY," THE AD CLAIMED. A full page ad for Assurant, Inc. in the New York Times had a colorful picture of a yo-yo, signifying I know not what. It explained it this way: Gravity: Attractive force between bodies proportional to their masses and the distance between them. THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND. Opinions are the author's and not necessarily shared by the University of Maryland, but they should be. --- Archives of What's New can be found at http://www.aps.org/WN From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Mar 26 15:25:38 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2QNPTg8009555; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 15:25:29 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2QNPQgu009529; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 15:25:26 -0800 Resent-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 15:25:26 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.2.20040326145115.0600c3f0 mail.dlsi.net> X-Sender: stevek mail.dlsi.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9 Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 15:29:00 -0800 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Steve Krivit Subject: Re: Thoughts on C F In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=====================_1369267187==.ALT" Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53737 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: --=====================_1369267187==.ALT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed At 03:28 AM 3/26/2004 -0600, you wrote: >Horace Heffner posted; >Perhaps I'm too short sighted, but seems to me that the best that can be >hoped for is an educated press. Horace, I don't think you're too short sighted. Jed's getting the substance of this science out there through LENR-CANR.org. We're getting the word out to the press in a format they seem to be able to understand. We blasted out a press release on Sunday night regarding the DOE and our 2004 Cold Fusion Report. Kenneth Chang contacted us Monday morning, asking for a copy. Tuesday he was on a plane to Montreal chasing down the cold fusion researchers at the APS meeting. On Thursday, he broke new ground for a prominent media outlet by demonstrating an understanding that CF is a)newsworthy and b)credible. IMO, that is huge progress and it will enable other conventional news media to feel much safer to cover the topic. A week prior, others who had been communicating with him had the impression that Chang thought CF was not newsworthy because CF experimental results were not strong enough. Shift happens. The science media and general press have been, and will continue to be the primary targets for our efforts. If you or any other Vortexians have particular journalists you'd like us to communicate with, please let us know. Best Regards, Steven B. Krivit Nadine Winocur, Psy.D. New Energy Times Los Angeles, California, USA www.newenergytimes.com Phone: (310) 470-8189 --=====================_1369267187==.ALT Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" At 03:28 AM 3/26/2004 -0600, you wrote:
Horace Heffner posted;
Perhaps I'm too short sighted, but seems to me that the best that can be
hoped for is an educated press.   

Horace,

I don't think you're too short sighted.  Jed's getting the substance of this science out there through LENR-CANR.org.

We're getting the word out to the press in a format they seem to be able to understand. 

We blasted out a press release on Sunday night regarding the DOE and our 2004 Cold Fusion Report.  Kenneth Chang contacted us Monday morning, asking for a copy.  Tuesday he was on a plane to Montreal chasing down the cold fusion researchers at the APS meeting.  On Thursday, he broke new ground for a prominent media outlet by demonstrating an understanding that CF is a)newsworthy and b)credible.  IMO, that is huge progress and it will enable other conventional news media to feel much safer to cover the topic. 

A week prior, others who had been communicating with him had the impression that Chang thought CF was not newsworthy because CF experimental results were not strong enough.  Shift happens.

The science media and general press have been, and will continue to be the primary targets for our efforts.
If you or any other Vortexians have particular journalists you'd like us to communicate with, please let us know.


Best Regards,

Steven B. Krivit
Nadine Winocur, Psy.D.
New Energy Times
Los Angeles, California, USA
www.newenergytimes.com
Phone: (310) 470-8189
  --=====================_1369267187==.ALT-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Mar 26 15:28:31 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2QNSLg8010352; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 15:28:22 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2QNSL8e010342; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 15:28:21 -0800 Resent-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 15:28:21 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-Id: <6.0.3.0.2.20040326182623.01cd7210 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell mindspring.com@pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.3.0 Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 18:28:29 -0500 To: vortex-L eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: Re: What's New blackout? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53738 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: It is strange, isn't it? I thought this would be red meat for Park. Maybe he will get around to it next week. It is hard to believe he will let it go without comment. Maybe he is just tired of it, or getting old. Someone should ask him. - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Mar 26 15:38:43 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2QNccg8013260; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 15:38:39 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2QNccHT013248; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 15:38:38 -0800 Resent-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 15:38:38 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.2.20040326153147.06023af0 mail.dlsi.net> X-Sender: stevek mail.dlsi.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9 Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 15:42:10 -0800 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Steve Krivit Subject: Re: What's New blackout? In-Reply-To: <30.5289c831.2d960aaa aol.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=====================_1370071593==.ALT" Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53739 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: RO X-Status: --=====================_1370071593==.ALT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed At 05:37 PM 3/26/2004 -0500, you wrote: >Hi All - > >When for the last couple of weeks the DOE policy shift was just rumored, I >didn't expect any mention from Robert Park in his weekly column. But now >even the Times has picked it up -- still nothing. Has he decided that >ignoring Cold Fusion will make it go away? > >Best regards, > >Erik Baard Erik, No kidding...I can't figure that guy out...I was kind of hoping he'd rail Nadine and I in this week's "What's New" for how we included him in our report...I wouldn't mind some mud slung westward. I'll take any free PR Bob will give us . My guess is a)he's working behind the scenes to place wrenches in the DOE gears or b)he knows we're coming and that he's outnumbered. (wishful thinking) or c)he's finally realized what a fool he's made of himself and is trying to find a corner? (wishful thinking again) But the bottom line is, that if enough intelligent people know the truth, it won't matter what Bob says. Regardless, his silence definitely means something, but exactly what is anybody's guess. Steve --=====================_1370071593==.ALT Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" At 05:37 PM 3/26/2004 -0500, you wrote:

Hi All -

When for the last couple of weeks the DOE policy shift was just rumored, I didn't expect any mention from Robert Park in his weekly column.  But now even the Times has picked it up -- still nothing.  Has he decided that ignoring Cold Fusion will make it go away?

Best regards,

Erik Baard


Erik,

No kidding...I can't figure that guy out...I was kind of hoping he'd rail Nadine and I in this week's "What's New" for how we included him in our report...I wouldn't mind some mud slung westward.  I'll take any free PR Bob will give us <g>.  

My guess is a)he's working behind the scenes to place wrenches in the DOE gears or b)he knows we're coming and that he's outnumbered. (wishful thinking) or c)he's finally realized what a fool he's made of himself and is trying to find a corner?   (wishful thinking again)  But the bottom line is, that if enough intelligent people know the truth, it won't matter what Bob says.

Regardless, his silence definitely means something, but exactly what is anybody's guess.

Steve


--=====================_1370071593==.ALT-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Mar 26 15:39:15 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2QNdBg8013467; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 15:39:11 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2QNdAE8013450; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 15:39:10 -0800 Resent-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 15:39:10 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <000d01c4138c$1d662880$c864a8c0 win98> From: To: Subject: hidden Mazatzal pieces Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 01:43:05 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53740 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Horace and Craig, If you save these pictures and modify gamma correction and examine the shadowy part, layer pieces of marble white material become visible. Note very bright dots (excluding defected pixels of camera) impliying some good reflections. marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/p/077/2P133207496EFF2232P2871L7M1.HTML marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/p/077/2P133207472EFF2232P2871L7M1.HTML Regards, hamdi ucar From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Mar 26 15:41:17 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2QNf9f7022707; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 15:41:09 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2QNf6H9022681; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 15:41:06 -0800 Resent-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 15:41:06 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-Id: <6.0.3.0.2.20040326183858.01cee5b0 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell mindspring.com@pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.3.0 Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 18:41:14 -0500 To: vortex-L eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: New York Times spike at LENR-CANR.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53741 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: For Thursday and Friday we had a total of 5,950 downloads. This compares to ~2,900 (for two days) most weeks. In other words, traffic doubled. I find this encouraging. It means that we are reaching much of our potential audience already, and the New York Times does not have a substantially wider reach than we do, when it comes to the audience for cold fusion information. If the Times were to publish a front-page article declaring that cold fusion is real, and the article listed our web site, I suppose we would get something like ~30,000 downloads in one day. Something less dramatic and direct, such as a fairly positive CF story in their Science section, apparently causes ~3,000 extra downloads. - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Mar 26 20:44:56 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2R4iquu021767; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 20:44:52 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2R4io9W021743; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 20:44:50 -0800 Resent-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 20:44:50 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 19:50:58 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: Life On Ice Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53742 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 12:29 AM 3/27/4, wrote: >Finally found a transparent depth on this material! This not on the clean area >but below the crack. I switched between two images repeatedly and when the >background shades become aligned, surface dust moves. I had noted the surface >below the crack was not smooth earlier. It appears the "rock" have many layers. >the Upper layer on this image is a transparent thin layer having some dust >particles attached. This layer is bumpy. Below this layer is the muddy opaque >or semi opaque layer where the shades take places. This layer have flat upper >surface. Actually it is exposed above the crack. Small protrusion above the >crack appears not part of the layer but attached to the layer and possibly >detached by the force of the RAT without grinding. Still I do not >understand how >RAT exposed these glassy layer without scratching it. The rover's arm is preheated to over 50 C before any movement. That is pretty hot for mars. Just prior to the photo there was an accidental attempt to get an xray spectogram with the spectrometer outer window closed. That might just account for enough heat to do the final polishing. All just speculation of course. The "ice" if it be ice, must be a sulfate gel of some kind. It has to have a high salt content plus an ability to form a protective skin of some kind as it sublimates. It may be useful to compare the cleaned surface: to the original surface: that is to say compare: marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/m/079/2M133386588EFF2232P2957M2M1.JPG marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/m/078/2M133286212EFF2232P2957M2M1.JPG The two photos align almost perfectly. When toggeling back and forth between overlayed windows, it is easy to tell which features that remain are remnants of surface features that were removed. There is no sign of the deeper fuzzy features. It appears the long scatch was a long ridge on the original rock. It is hard to tell if it is a ridge now or just simply ground flat. If it is ground flat then it certainly appears there is at least a shallow layer that is transparent that shows what was under the ridge. At 11:30 PM 3/26/4, wrote: >http://orchestra.webhostme.com/images/image1.jpg >and >http://orchestra.webhostme.com/images/image2.jpg > >Images are nearly identical now. I would like you take these images and >obtain a >composed 3D image and check it. Done. Copy attached to another private email. There are differences in the images, but no really striking 3D effect. Has me wondering about my prior observations. It could be obsidian or even a volcanic glass of some kind. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Mar 26 21:42:58 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2R5gsru028457; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 21:42:54 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2R5gr9j028440; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 21:42:53 -0800 Resent-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 21:42:53 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 20:49:06 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: hidden Mazatzal pieces Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53743 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 1:43 AM 3/27/4, wrote: >Horace and Craig, > >If you save these pictures and modify gamma correction and examine the shadowy >part, layer pieces of marble white material become visible. Note very bright >dots (excluding defected pixels of camera) impliying some good reflections. >marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/p/077/2P133207496EFF2232P2871L7M1.HTML >marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/p/077/2P133207472EFF2232P2871L7M1.HTML > >Regards, hamdi ucar An interresting find! When I brighten up the image so as to see in the shadow portion I see a line of light spots. I would have said they are due to light relfecting off bright metal parts of the rover. However, it is very strange the light seems to follow or extend a large crack in the rock. Since we are having fun with outlandish speculations, here is one. It may be possible the light in the line of light spots is coming from inside the rock. It may be coming through the crack in the rock, which is covered in part here and there with dirt, etc. This would mean that the rock is made of transparent material, and there is an opening somewhere for light to get into the rock, or that the dirt covering the rock is somewhat translucent. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Fri Mar 26 22:34:21 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2R6Y9Ni006603; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 22:34:09 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2R6Y9Ot006592; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 22:34:09 -0800 Resent-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 22:34:09 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 21:40:24 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: hidden Mazatzal pieces Resent-Message-ID: <271vCB.A.3mB.gBSZAB ultra6.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53744 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 1:43 AM 3/27/4, wrote: >Horace and Craig, > >If you save these pictures and modify gamma correction and examine the shadowy >part, layer pieces of marble white material become visible. Note very bright >dots (excluding defected pixels of camera) impliying some good reflections. >marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/p/077/2P133207496EFF2232P2871L7M1.HTML >marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/p/077/2P133207472EFF2232P2871L7M1.HTML > >Regards, hamdi ucar The bright spots in the shadows do not seem to be reflections. They are still there after the rock grind and at the same locations despite a new sun angle. See: marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/p/081/2P133566427EFF2232P2589L7M1.JPG Note how places in the grind spots seem like they might their own backlight as well. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Mar 27 04:05:43 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2RC5QZc017294; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 04:05:26 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2RC5N3x017262; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 04:05:23 -0800 Resent-Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 04:05:23 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f From: FZNIDARSIC aol.com Message-ID: <106.2e127f35.2d96c7fe aol.com> Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 07:05:18 EST Subject: capacitance and cold fusion To: vortex-l eskimo.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_106.2e127f35.2d96c7fe_boundary" X-Mailer: 7.0 for Windows sub 10712 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53745 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: --part1_106.2e127f35.2d96c7fe_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

A NOTE ON HOT FUSION

The hot fusion community understands the concept of the isotropic capacitance of the nuclues. They keep the electrostatic potential of the nucleus low by selecting nucleons with only a single electrical charge. They reduce the potential produced by this charge by selecting isotopes with the greatest size. This larger size of hydrogen's deuterium isotope increases the isotropic capacitance of the nucleus and lowers the height of the electrostatic potential wall. At this point they abandoned the concept of capacitance and smashed deuterions together for 50 years. They failed to understand that capacitance is not a local phenomena. The height of the electrostatic potential wall is influenced by the geometry of the system. For example, an electron within a conducting sphere experiences the isotropic capacitance of the entire sphere. The nucleons within this sphere do not experience this capacitance because they are not free to move about. The cold fusion community has shown us that the mobile nucleons within proton conductors do experience the isotropic capacitance of the quantum system. They normally do not fuse because their velocity is very low. Forced diffusion experiments conducted by Mitsubishi Heavy Industries in Japan have produced anamolous nuclear reactions. 7 These experiments introduced velocity into the system. The velocity is great enough to overcome the reduced potential barrier of the mobile protons.

The stimulation of a proton conductor at a dimensional frequency of one megahertz-meter introduces superconductivity into the system. The strong, weak, electromagnetic, and gravitational participate in the superconductive system. --part1_106.2e127f35.2d96c7fe_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <h4> A NOTE ON HOT FUSION <= ;/h4>

The hot fusion community understands the concept of the isotropic capacitanc= e of
the nuclues.  They keep the electrostatic potential of the nucleus low=20= by selecting nucleons
with only a single electrical charge.  They reduce the potential
produced by this charge by selecting isotopes with the greatest
size.  This larger size of hydrogen's deuterium isotope increases the i= sotropic
capacitance of the nucleus and lowers the height of
the electrostatic potential wall.  At this point they
abandoned the concept of capacitance and smashed deuterions together for 50=20= years. 
They failed to understand that capacitance is not a local phenomena.  T= he height
of the electrostatic potential wall is influenced by the geometry of the sys= tem.
For example, an electron within a conducting sphere experiences the isotropi= c capacitance
of the entire sphere.  The nucleons within this sphere do not experienc= e this capacitance because they are
not free to move about.  The cold fusion community has shown us that th= e mobile
nucleons within proton conductors do experience the isotropic capacitance of= the quantum
system.  They normally do not fuse because their velocity is very low.=20= Forced diffusion experiments
conducted by Mitsubishi Heavy Industries in Japan have produced anamolous nu= clear reactions.
<sub><A HREF=3D"#notes">7  </a></sub>
These experiments introduced velocity into the system.  The velocity is= great enough to overcome
the reduced potential barrier of the mobile protons. 
<br><br>
The stimulation of a proton conductor at
a dimensional frequency of one megahertz-meter introduces superconductivity=20= into the system.
The strong, weak, electromagnetic, and gravitational participate in the supe= rconductive system.
--part1_106.2e127f35.2d96c7fe_boundary-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Mar 27 05:08:49 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2RCD9Zc019696; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 04:13:09 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2RCD7oM019677; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 04:13:07 -0800 Resent-Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 04:13:07 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.1.4.030702.0 Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 07:16:32 -0500 Subject: Re: New York Times spike at LENR-CANR.org From: "Eugene F. Mallove" To: "vortex l eskimo.com" Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <6.0.3.0.2.20040326183858.01cee5b0 pop.mindspring.com> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <1AZBVC.A.XzE.T_WZAB ultra5.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53746 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: On 3/26/04 6:41 PM, "Jed Rothwell" wrote: > If the Times were to publish a front-page article declaring that cold > fusion is real, and the article listed our web site, I suppose we would get > something like ~30,000 downloads in one day. Something less dramatic and > direct, such as a fairly positive CF story in their Science section, > apparently causes ~3,000 extra downloads. It was not not in the Science Times Section (which is on Tuesday always). It was on page A16 - the main section, where more people would be likely to see it. - Gene Mallove, www.infinite-energy.com From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Mar 27 08:10:26 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2RGAJZc025838; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 08:10:19 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2RGA8ap025747; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 08:10:08 -0800 Resent-Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 08:10:08 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <4065A7EF.1010202 rtpatlanta.com> Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 11:12:31 -0500 From: Terry Blanton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Mars Methane Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53747 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: It's getting pretty difficult to deny, eh? http://news.independent.co.uk/world/science_medical/story.jsp?story=505454 From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Mar 27 08:28:17 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2RGSAZc031572; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 08:28:10 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2RGS74N031541; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 08:28:07 -0800 Resent-Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 08:28:07 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <001601c41419$0cdd8ac0$c864a8c0 win98> From: To: Subject: Some microscobic 3D features Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 18:31:09 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Resent-Message-ID: <8a9eW.A.vsH.XuaZAB ultra5.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53748 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: While looking for my elusive earth worms in Opportunity's photos, I obtained a pair of photos with large offset, having a small overlapping region. But this large offset gave very good 3D depth, allowing seeing some structures rising from the soil consisting of a very thin stem and a head. I am sure I had seen similar thing rising on decaying tree bodies. I chose images marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/m/055/1M133070194EFF06GOP2956M2M1.JPG and marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/m/055/1M133069592EFF06GOP2956M2M1.JPG from page http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/opportunity_m055.html These feature can be seen better along the light area. You can also see the blueberry how it is attached to the soil from the left side. While searching the web to find a similar looking earth species I encountered a picture of "Penicillium strand" at http://www.dstgroup.com/DST%20Mould%20Analysis%20pics.pdf in figure 6. This strands looks is similar size of the filaments which I have no difficulty to find on most of microscopic images. Regards, hamdi ucar From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Mar 27 09:40:34 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2RHeKZc022761; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 09:40:20 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2RHeHIG022724; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 09:40:17 -0800 Resent-Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 09:40:17 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <006d01c41422$604e3c00$8837fea9 cpq> From: "Jones Beene" To: "vortex" Subject: The myth of lattice coupling and He ratios Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 09:38:54 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_006A_01C413DF.51BEA5A0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Resent-Message-ID: <3MenPC.A.AjF.AybZAB ultra5.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53749 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_006A_01C413DF.51BEA5A0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable The only unambiguous characteristic of fusion reactions is gamma = radiation.=20 Sure, the element helium can conceivably be derived from an extremely = unlikely form of fusion, but it is infinitely more likely to be found = from a plethora of other innocuous sources. The appearance of helium is = ALWAY ambiguous evidence for fusion, no matter how well it correlates to = excess energy UNLESS the statistical correlation can be framed to be = arguably absolute. In point of fact, the correlation is shaky even in = those few excess-heat experiments where helium is found in rough = proportion to excess energy, but most damning is that in much, probably = most of the highest quality CF work done in the 1990s, the major ash = component was tritium, such as found in careful experiments done by = Claytor and others with almost no helium except that which decayed from = tritium. Tritium, of course, releases gamma radiation. Helium is ubiquitous- not surprising since it is the second most common = element in the universe; it is found everywhere on earth, in air, = natural gas, all kinds of radioactive decay and in many manufactured = product where natural gas was used in processing, such as stainless = steel and the rubber seals of vacuum chambers. Also, in testing there = are pitfalls - to detect He in a mass spec is somewhat difficult because = of the mass similarity to molecular deuterium. That problem would fall = under the category of "measurement error" and is not relevant to broader = theoretical implications. Helium is also the smallest molecule (since the molecule is monatomic) = and so mobile and hard to contain or EXCLUDE from any container, in that = it can go INTO any vacuum chamber from environmental air over time. This = mass transfer process doesn't require a loose seal necessarily, as many = metals are porous to helium, especially after mechanical degradation, = such as years of flexing every time you start up the turbo pump.=20 The air we breathe consists of one part in 200,000 helium, but in trying = to "rewrite" mother nature, you will find some researchers who will say = that it is less than that, or even "de minimis" - so that its real = ubiquity is ignored so as to better fit into an agenda. Sorry, helium is = one part in 200,000 in air which means that for every breath you take, = you will exhale approximately 500,000,000,000,000,000 helium atoms. If = this was found to be in rough correlation to the energy your body was = burning during that breath (actually it is not far off) does that then = mean that your metabolism was working on D+D fusion? I think not. Consequently to say that helium was found in rough proportion to excess = energy in a ratio of one million helium atoms for every for every 38 = ergs of excess energy in a particular experiment, will appear to a = skeptic of cold fusion as really meaningless, and therefore the = explanation itself may tend to negate the excellent experimental = results. In short, the experimenter would be better off to NOT choose = that explanation... perhaps, not to even look for helium in the first = place. When one becomes so tied to a particular principle, and so desirous to = invoke the "fusion" explanation for findings of excess energy, but can = find no high energy photons (which cannot be hidden if they were there) = and which are the only unambiguous characteristic of fusion reactions, = then there is a great incentive to grasp at other explanations to cope = with this problem. A current favorite rationalization for this is to say = that the energy emission is effectively "coupled to the lattice." But is = there any evidence for this happening elsewhere in all of physics? Yes, if you google such phrases as "lattice coupling" you will get = several thousand hits ! So, has a proper defense for lack of gammas been = magically found? Only if you don't read on to find that almost all of = that research involves ELECTRON-LATTICE coupling, not nuclear coupling. = Outside of the cold fusion arena, I can find no good references to the = existence of high probability nuclear coupling - that is, there exist = some kinds of extremely low energy (Mossbauer effect) and/or low = probability phenomena are said to be evidence of lattice coupling. That = is doubtful in itself, but for the sake of argument, lets say it is = evidence of nuclear coupling. In the Mossbauer effect, look carefully at = the ratio- one may get one coupling per million atoms depending on how = low a temperature you have, and even so - is that process transferable = to CF, and wouldn't it still leave lots of detectable 24 MeV gammas from = deuterium fusion, not to mention the secondaries. In effect, you would = still have the dead graduate assistant unless the coupling cross-section = could be pushed extremely high, which will never happen at elevated = temperature. Inside the CF area - if you look at the old Sci.physics.fusion arguments = such as those by dyed-in-the-wool skeptic Richard Blue (who I find it a = bit detestable to quote, except that in this case he is correct), you = will find this following argument. Unfortunately there has been little = effective counter-argument to his main contention on the extreme rarity = of nuclear lattice-coupling. "Both Mitchell Swartz and Bob Cormach seem to want to apply a simple = null test to this question. For them the lattice-nucleus coupling either = exists or it does not exist. Then as their logic would have it, any = demonstration of the existence of this coupling in even one case is = sufficient to "prove" that cold fusion is really occurring wherever we = want it to occur. No further test of the cold fusion hypothesis is = required!" "The Swartz approach to the lattice-nucleus coupling is not acceptable = physics in my book. I acknowledge that there are many circumstances in = which such couplings are clearly demonstrated. In fact a great deal of = nuclear physics and solid state physics investigations have made use of = this couplings as probes to investigate some very intricate details of = nuclear and/or atomic structures. As a prime example one need only = mention Nuclear Magnetic Resonance - MRI to some of you perhaps. I also = would not leave out Mitchell's favorite, Mossbauer Effect." "What I would suggest is that we need to move beyond the mere existence = of a nuclear-lattice coupling to a discussion of the quantitative = aspects of such couplings. If one assigns an energy scale to the = various known couplings there is a pattern that is worth noting. The = energies involved in nuclear-lattice couplings are not very big. They = don't have very large effects on the nuclear states involved. Now is = such experimental data something we can simply ignore? I claim that all = the experimental data that addresses this question has to be considered = and given weight appropriately along with the CF calorimetry data. To = my mind it defies logic to assert that this body of experimental data = should be ignored in this discussion. The evidence clearly indicates = that nuclear-lattice couplings are, at most, small perturbations on = nuclear states. Is there anyone who would challenge that statement as a = good summary for the vast body of data available?" END of quote I think anyone can easily see that two points have been made in this and = other related posts (and never countered effectively). The points are = that outside of cold fusion, that nuclear lattice-coupling is a low = energy. low probability phenomenon - far from a "bulk" or common event. = For it to be the prime reason that gammas are not found would imply that = it happens *most of the time* in CF, but nowhere else in all of physics = - as even in the best of circumstances it is a rare event. Moreover, the = 24 MeV photon is so incredibly potent and detectable (and deadly) that = it would stick out like a sore thumb in situations where many joules of = excess heat were released unless the coupling were nearly absolute.=20 Bottom line - by invoking lattice coupling, the apologist is = piggybacking one even more debilitating controversy on top of another.=20 Why penalize your good experimental results with such a lame theory?=20 Jones If you want to invoke phonon or lattice coupling, then first set up an = experiment where you can show that nuclear lattice coupling is high = probability and happens most of the time in similar situations. = Unfortunately, one relevant experiment has actually been performed and = it is null. When one loads tritium into a Pd lattice, the decay gammas = are still measurable and correlate well with what theory says they = should be - how could this be true if Pd somehow promotes nuclear = lattice coupling? Can't everyone see the problem? We know that radioactive hydrogen = (tritium) is not coupled to any degree in a Pd matrix and cannot even be = induced to couple, so how can the thousand-fold higher radiation levels = of deuterium fusion be said to ever couple, and especially to couple so = well that ZERO 24 MeV gammas can be measured? =20 ------=_NextPart_000_006A_01C413DF.51BEA5A0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
The only unambiguous characteristic of fusion reactions is gamma = radiation.=20
 
Sure, the element helium can conceivably be derived from an = extremely=20 unlikely form of fusion, but it is infinitely more likely to be=20 found from a plethora of other innocuous sources. The = appearance of=20 helium is ALWAY ambiguous evidence for fusion, no matter how well = it=20 correlates to excess energy UNLESS the statistical correlation can be = framed to=20 be arguably absolute. In point of fact, the correlation is shaky = even in=20 those few excess-heat experiments where helium is found in rough = proportion to=20 excess energy, but most damning is that in much, probably most of the = highest=20 quality CF work done in the 1990s, the major ash component was tritium, = such=20 as found in careful experiments done by Claytor and others with = almost no=20 helium except that which decayed from tritium. Tritium, of course, = releases=20 gamma radiation.
 
Helium is ubiquitous- not surprising since it is the second most = common=20 element in the universe; it is found everywhere on earth, in air,=20 natural gas, all kinds of radioactive decay and in many = manufactured=20 product where natural gas was used in processing, such as stainless = steel and=20 the rubber seals of vacuum chambers. Also, in testing there are pitfalls = - to detect He in a mass spec is somewhat difficult because of the = mass=20 similarity to molecular deuterium. That problem would fall under the = category of=20 "measurement error" and is not relevant to broader theoretical = implications.
 
Helium is also the smallest molecule (since the molecule is = monatomic) and=20 so mobile and hard to contain or EXCLUDE from any container, in that it = can go=20 INTO any vacuum chamber from environmental air over time. This mass = transfer process doesn't require a loose seal necessarily, as many = metals are=20 porous to helium, especially after mechanical degradation, such as years = of=20 flexing every time you start up the turbo pump.
 
The air we breathe consists of one part in 200,000 helium, but in = trying to=20 "rewrite" mother nature, you will find some researchers who will say = that it is=20 less than that, or even "de minimis" - so that its real = ubiquity is=20 ignored so as to better fit into an agenda. = Sorry, helium is one=20 part in 200,000 in air which means that for every breath you take, you = will=20 exhale approximately 500,000,000,000,000,000 helium atoms. If this = was=20 found to be in rough correlation to the energy your body = was burning during=20 that breath (actually it is not far off) does that then mean that your=20 metabolism was working on D+D fusion? I think not.
 
Consequently to say that helium was found in rough proportion to = excess=20 energy in a ratio of one million helium atoms for every for = every 38=20 ergs of excess energy in a particular experiment, will appear to a = skeptic of=20 cold fusion as really meaningless, and therefore the explanation itself = may tend=20 to negate the excellent experimental results. In short, the experimenter = would=20 be better off to NOT choose that explanation... perhaps, not to even = look for=20 helium in the first place.
 
When one becomes so tied to a particular principle, and so = desirous to=20 invoke the "fusion" explanation for findings of excess energy, but can = find no=20 high energy photons (which cannot be hidden if they were there) and = which are=20 the only unambiguous characteristic of fusion reactions, then there is a = great=20 incentive to grasp at other explanations to cope with this problem. A = current=20 favorite rationalization for this is to say that the energy emission is=20 effectively "coupled to the lattice." But is there any evidence for this = happening elsewhere in all of physics?
 
Yes, if you google such phrases as "lattice coupling" you will get = several=20 thousand hits ! So, has a proper defense for lack of gammas been = magically=20 found? Only if you don't read on to find that almost all of that = research=20 involves ELECTRON-LATTICE coupling, not nuclear coupling. Outside of the = cold=20 fusion arena, I can find no good references to the existence of = high=20 probability nuclear coupling - that is, there exist some kinds of=20 extremely low energy (Mossbauer effect) and/or low probability = phenomena=20 are said to be evidence of lattice coupling. That is doubtful in = itself,=20 but for the sake of argument, lets say it is evidence of nuclear = coupling. In=20 the Mossbauer effect, look carefully at the ratio- one may get one = coupling=20 per million atoms depending on how low a temperature you have, and even = so - is=20 that process transferable to CF, and wouldn't it still leave lots = of=20 detectable 24 MeV gammas from deuterium fusion, not to mention the = secondaries.=20 In effect, you would still have the dead graduate assistant unless the = coupling=20 cross-section could be pushed extremely high, which will never happen at = elevated temperature.
 
Inside the CF area - if you look at the old Sci.physics.fusion = arguments=20 such as those by dyed-in-the-wool skeptic Richard Blue (who I find it a = bit=20 detestable to quote, except that in this case he is correct), you will = find this=20 following argument. Unfortunately there has been little effective=20 counter-argument to his main contention on the extreme rarity of = nuclear=20 lattice-coupling.
 
"Both Mitchell Swartz and Bob Cormach seem to want to apply a = simple null=20 test to this question. For them the lattice-nucleus coupling either = exists or it=20 does not exist. Then as their logic would have it, any demonstration of = the=20 existence of this coupling in even one case is sufficient to "prove" = that cold=20 fusion is really occurring wherever we want it to occur.  No = further test=20 of the cold fusion hypothesis is required!"
 
"The Swartz approach to the lattice-nucleus coupling is not = acceptable=20 physics in my book.  I acknowledge that there are many = circumstances in=20 which such couplings are clearly demonstrated.  In fact a great = deal of=20 nuclear physics and solid state physics investigations have made use of = this=20 couplings as probes to investigate some very intricate details of = nuclear and/or=20 atomic structures.  As a prime example one need only mention = Nuclear=20 Magnetic Resonance - MRI to some of you perhaps.  I also would not = leave=20 out Mitchell's favorite, Mossbauer Effect."
 
"What I would suggest is that we need to move beyond the mere = existence of=20 a nuclear-lattice coupling to a discussion of the quantitative aspects = of such=20 couplings.  If one assigns an energy scale to the various known = couplings=20 there is a pattern that is worth noting.  The energies involved in=20 nuclear-lattice couplings are not very big.  They don't have very = large=20 effects on the nuclear states involved.  Now is such experimental = data=20 something we can simply ignore?  I claim that all the experimental = data=20 that addresses this question has to be considered and given weight = appropriately=20 along with the CF calorimetry data.  To my mind it defies logic to = assert=20 that this body of experimental data should be ignored in this = discussion. =20 The evidence clearly indicates that nuclear-lattice couplings are, at = most,=20 small perturbations on nuclear states.  Is there anyone who would = challenge=20 that statement as a good summary for the vast
body of data = available?" END of=20 quote
 
I think anyone can easily see that two points have been = made in this=20 and other related posts (and never countered effectively). The = points are=20 that outside of cold fusion, that nuclear lattice-coupling is a low = energy.=20 low probability phenomenon - far from a "bulk" or common event. For it = to be the=20 prime reason that gammas are not found would imply that it happens *most = of the=20 time* in CF, but nowhere else in all of physics - as even in the best of = circumstances it is a rare event. Moreover, the 24 MeV photon is so = incredibly=20 potent and detectable (and deadly) that it would stick out like a sore = thumb in=20 situations where many joules of excess heat were released unless the = coupling=20 were nearly absolute.
 
Bottom line - by invoking lattice coupling, the apologist is = piggybacking=20 one even more debilitating controversy on top of another.
 
Why penalize your good experimental results with such a lame = theory?
 
Jones
 
If you want to invoke phonon or lattice coupling, then first set up = an=20 experiment where you can show that nuclear lattice coupling is high = probability=20 and happens most of the time in similar situations. Unfortunately, one = relevant=20 experiment has actually been performed and it is null. When one = loads=20 tritium into a Pd lattice, the decay gammas are still measurable and = correlate=20 well with what theory says they should be - how could this be=20 true if Pd somehow promotes nuclear = lattice coupling?
 
Can't everyone see the problem? We know that radioactive hydrogen = (tritium)=20 is not coupled to any degree in a Pd matrix and cannot even be induced = to=20 couple, so how can the thousand-fold higher radiation levels of = deuterium fusion=20 be said to ever couple, and especially to couple so well that ZERO  = 24 MeV=20 gammas can be measured?
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
------=_NextPart_000_006A_01C413DF.51BEA5A0-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Mar 27 10:24:10 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2RIO2Zc008035; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 10:24:02 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2RIO19m008018; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 10:24:01 -0800 Resent-Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 10:24:01 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <000001c41429$3f8aeb60$c864a8c0 win98> From: To: Subject: Re: Some microscopic 3D features Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 20:25:55 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53750 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Better pair are marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/m/055/1M133070133EFF06GOP2956M2M1.JPG marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/m/055/1M133069653EFF06GOP2956M2M1.JPG http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/m/055/1M133070133EFF06GOP2956M2M1.JPG http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/m/055/1M133069653EFF06GOP2956M2M1.JPG Even some micro-fiber like things are visible in 3D. In non overlapping regions there are more longer of them. These fiber appear to holding evenly spaced particles. Could be some spors? The whole scene contain rounded particle in a matrix. It is hardly to believe these are ordinary dust. I am not sure but mars dust particles could be too fine to be observed by this camera. Regards, hamdi ucar > While looking for my elusive earth worms in Opportunity's photos, I obtained a > pair of photos with large offset, having a small overlapping region. But this > large offset gave very good 3D depth, allowing seeing some structures rising > from the soil consisting of a very thin stem and a head. I am sure I had seen > similar thing rising on decaying tree bodies. > I chose images > marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/m/055/1M133070194EFF06GOP2956M2M1.JPG > and > marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/m/055/1M133069592EFF06GOP2956M2M1.JPG > from page http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/opportunity_m055.html > These feature can be seen better along the light area. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Mar 27 10:27:46 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2RIRhNi013324; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 10:27:44 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2RIReCm013304; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 10:27:40 -0800 Resent-Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 10:27:40 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net (Unverified) Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 09:34:00 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: hidden Mazatzal pieces Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53751 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 1:43 AM 3/27/4, wrote: >Horace and Craig, > >If you save these pictures and modify gamma correction and examine the shadowy >part, layer pieces of marble white material become visible. Note very bright >dots (excluding defected pixels of camera) impliying some good reflections. >marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/p/077/2P133207496EFF2232P2871L7M1.HTML >marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/p/077/2P133207472EFF2232P2871L7M1.HTML > >Regards, hamdi ucar The bright spots in the shadows were almost certainly made by the rover's weels. They are an extension of the left side of the left wheel track that goes up on the rock. It looks like the bright spots were made as a result of the sharp edges of the weels cutting into the rock. It would seem the rock is not so hard, though the NASA press release for the day for Spirit implies it is harder than other rocks Spirit has ground. Maybe the bright marks are not in Mazatzal, but some other rock? There are lots of cracks in the rocks there, so it is hard to tell what is a given rock, but the bright spots are definitely on ehte surface of a rock. The two grind/brush circles are definitely right above and just to the left of the bright spots. In effect the bright spots could be reflections, but not like from a single mirrored surface, but more like from bright blue snow. It appears the stuff is blue. Coincidentally glacial ice is also often blue, but ice on Mars, if any of the immediate subsurface stuff is ice, must have a lot of dissolved salts in it that may color it. marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/p/081/2P133566427EFF2232P2589L7M1.JPG Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Mar 27 10:40:49 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2RIedZc015372; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 10:40:39 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2RIebwX015353; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 10:40:37 -0800 Resent-Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 10:40:37 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <000e01c4142b$90b13ba0$c864a8c0 win98> From: To: References: Subject: Re: hidden Mazatzal pieces Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 20:44:28 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53752 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: ----- Original Message ----- From: "Horace Heffner" To: Sent: 27 March 2004 20:34 Subject: Re: hidden Mazatzal pieces > In effect the bright spots could be reflections, but not like from a single > mirrored surface, but more like from bright blue snow. It appears the > stuff is blue. Coincidentally glacial ice is also often blue, but ice on > Mars, if any of the immediate subsurface stuff is ice, must have a lot of > dissolved salts in it that may color it. > Could salts be dissolved (distributed in molecular level) in water ice? From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Mar 27 13:08:23 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2RL8HZc019392; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 13:08:17 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2RL81oo019111; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 13:08:01 -0800 Resent-Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 13:08:01 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <4065ECA9.20507 rtpatlanta.com> Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 16:05:45 -0500 From: Terry Blanton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Mars Methane Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53753 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: (2nd try) It's getting pretty difficult to deny, eh? http://news.independent.co.uk/world/science_medical/story.jsp?story=505454 From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Mar 27 15:15:23 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2RNFIeY009899; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 15:15:19 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2RNFHQL009886; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 15:15:17 -0800 Resent-Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 15:15:17 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <003101c41451$e9c00ac0$c864a8c0 win98> From: To: Subject: test - ignore Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 01:18:59 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53754 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: < From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Mar 27 15:45:06 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2RNj2hs004385; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 15:45:03 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2RNivOv004358; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 15:44:57 -0800 Resent-Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 15:44:57 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f From: Robin van Spaandonk To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Another possible helium producing mechanism Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 09:45:07 +1000 Organization: Improving Message-ID: <7s3c60hjkfgjlvdn4vm8jk31n6931sc9gu 4ax.com> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ultra6.eskimo.com id i2RNiqhs004322 Resent-Message-ID: <9TWtgD.A.CEB.5HhZAB ultra6.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53755 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Hi, The charge on a helium nucleus will precisely balance that of two deuterino deuteride ions. This would allow a helium nucleus to function as a nuclear catalytic site, as the two severely shrunken deuterinodeuteride (D-) ions can, once attached to the helium nucleus, and thus in permanent close proximity to one another, fuse with one another resulting in a new helium nucleus. The energy resulting from the reaction would be shared by both helium nuclei (the original, and the new one), and by the spare electrons as would the momentum. Hence this reaction produces pure He4, while both energy and momentum are conserved. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk If "other people" can be denied their rights, then what's to stop someone claiming that you belong among the "other people"? From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Mar 27 16:32:04 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2S0W0SD008835; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 16:32:00 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2S0VcGS008764; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 16:31:38 -0800 Resent-Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 16:31:38 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <002401c4145c$94559540$c864a8c0 win98> From: To: Subject: Some microscopic 3D features on Mars Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 03:35:13 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53756 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: While looking for my elusive earth worms in Opportunity's photos, I obtained a pair of photos for 3D vision with large offset, having a small overlapping region. marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/m/055/1M133070133EFF06GOP2956M2M1.JPG marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/m/055/1M133069653EFF06GOP2956M2M1.JPG from page http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/opportunity_m055.html Large offset gave very good 3D depth, allowing to see some structures rising from the soil consisting of a very thin stem and a head. I am sure I have seen similar things growing on decaying tree bodies. These features can be seen better along the light colored area. Another interesting item here is the sphere like feature (kind of blueberry). It appears it is not standing on the surface but attached to the soil from the left side trough a mesh like structure. This is accordance of some other pictures of BB's. Some micro-fiber like things are also visible in 3D. In non overlapping regions there are more longer of them. These fibers appears to holding evenly spaced particles. Could be some dust or spores? Regards, hamdi ucar From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Mar 27 16:44:56 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2S0iqhs016534; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 16:44:52 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2S0ipRk016524; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 16:44:51 -0800 Resent-Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 16:44:51 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <40661FFD.7060702 ihug.co.nz> Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 12:44:45 +1200 From: John Berry User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: hidden Mazatzal pieces References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53757 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Why not use tinyurl.com It took me 2 seconds to make this link: http://tinyurl.com/23app Horace Heffner wrote: >At 1:43 AM 3/27/4, wrote: > > >>Horace and Craig, >> >>If you save these pictures and modify gamma correction and examine the shadowy >>part, layer pieces of marble white material become visible. Note very bright >>dots (excluding defected pixels of camera) impliying some good reflections. >>marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/p/077/2P133207496EFF2232P2871L7M1.HTML >>marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/p/077/2P133207472EFF2232P2871L7M1.HTML >> >>Regards, hamdi ucar >> >> > >The bright spots in the shadows were almost certainly made by the rover's >weels. They are an extension of the left side of the left wheel track that >goes up on the rock. It looks like the bright spots were made as a result >of the sharp edges of the weels cutting into the rock. It would seem the >rock is not so hard, though the NASA press release for the day for Spirit >implies it is harder than other rocks Spirit has ground. Maybe the bright >marks are not in Mazatzal, but some other rock? There are lots of cracks >in the rocks there, so it is hard to tell what is a given rock, but the >bright spots are definitely on ehte surface of a rock. The two grind/brush >circles are definitely right above and just to the left of the bright >spots. > >In effect the bright spots could be reflections, but not like from a single >mirrored surface, but more like from bright blue snow. It appears the >stuff is blue. Coincidentally glacial ice is also often blue, but ice on >Mars, if any of the immediate subsurface stuff is ice, must have a lot of >dissolved salts in it that may color it. > >7M1.JPG> > >marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/p/081/2P133566427EFF2232P2589L7M1.JPG > >Regards, > >Horace Heffner > > > > > > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Mar 27 16:51:57 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2S0poSD012282; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 16:51:50 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2S0pmrT012262; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 16:51:48 -0800 Resent-Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 16:51:48 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <000f01c4145e$daa738d0$f9ffa8c0 Craig> From: "SnowDog" To: References: Subject: Re: hidden Mazatzal pieces Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 18:51:49 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53758 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: > In effect the bright spots could be reflections, but not like from a single > mirrored surface, but more like from bright blue snow. It appears the > stuff is blue. Coincidentally glacial ice is also often blue, but ice on > Mars, if any of the immediate subsurface stuff is ice, must have a lot of > dissolved salts in it that may color it. How can you tell if something is blue? Without access to the calibration data, the only way to determine if something is blue is to calibrate the sky against the mirrors on the color wheel, for that day, or to try to calibrate a spot in the soil against the spectra analysis made by JPL on Day 3. Each filtered image has its maximum and minimum values adjusted to the highest and lowest values possible, to improve the compression performance before transmission. Because the blue filtered image is the darkest, it's value is exagerated the most in the filtered image. We need calibration data, which we don't have, to bring the color back to the correct value. Craig Haynie From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Mar 27 18:16:56 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2S2Gqhs031971; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 18:16:52 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2S2Gp2j031961; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 18:16:51 -0800 Resent-Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 18:16:51 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <001501c4146b$4d0bed60$c864a8c0 win98> From: To: Subject: Puzzled Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 05:20:42 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53759 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: I am puzzled by these dark colored knotted or twisted string looking features appearing in many soil microscopic pictures but marginally visible. I am puzzled because they can be easily mixed by shadows and they appear always in crests, not crossing over things. So it is difficult to find solid evidence they are indeed some objects. There are also a similar things, black mesh like patches take place also in crusts and having string like character. Despite these are clearly visible, it is difficult to identify them as real objects. These items appears never present on outside of crusts. For this reason they look like to earth worm. I placed an pictures pointing possible features of these items. I marked with blue some of them and with red some dark clusters and more suspicious ones. The main problem, once I start to sport them they appears in every place, and I start to suspect from false recognition. Analysed pictures are marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/m/052/1M132808705EFF06A8P2956M2M1.JPG marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/m/052/1M132808645EFF06A8P2956M2M1.JPG covering same scene with a slightly different focus. Marked image is http://orchestra.webhostme.com/images/1m132808705eff06a8p2956m2m1-x.jpg because it was jpg'ed second time, it should not be used for analyse. It is better to analyse images by 2x magnification. Another analyse image from the same scene is http://orchestra.webhostme.com/images/organic.gif showing another specie. I would like ask if this feature could be an evidence for an organic material? Regards, hamdi ucar From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Mar 27 22:49:01 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2S6muhs014676; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 22:48:57 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2S6mshn014667; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 22:48:54 -0800 Resent-Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 22:48:54 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f From: Robin van Spaandonk To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Asteroid flyby tonight Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 16:48:47 +1000 Organization: Improving Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ultra6.eskimo.com id i2S6mnhs014633 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53760 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Tue, 23 Mar 2004 15:07:18 -0900: Hi, >At 7:55 PM 3/22/4, thomas malloy wrote: >>How does the angle of incidence affect the amount of energy that the >>asteroid would release? > > >This seems like a trick question. 8^) > >All the caluclations provided earlier assume only the mechanical energy due >to momentum gained by a meteor from approaching the earth. Mechanical >energy is conserved, so there would be a fixed amount of energy expended >from any impact under that scenario, regardless of the angle of incidence. >That assumes actual impact, not a glancing blow of some kind, which would >be very unlikely anyway. [snip] Perhaps Thomas was referring to the angle with relation to the Earth's orbit around the Sun? If it approached in the plane of the ecliptic, in a retrograde orbit, then you can add the velocity of the Earth (~30 km/sec) to that of the meteor, which makes for a much bigger splash. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk If "other people" can be denied their rights, then what's to stop someone claiming that you belong among the "other people"? From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sat Mar 27 22:52:14 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2S6q7SD006648; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 22:52:08 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2S6q6ih006635; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 22:52:06 -0800 Resent-Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 22:52:06 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f From: Robin van Spaandonk To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Mars UFO Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 16:51:56 +1000 Organization: Improving Message-ID: <7btc601su6eghp43n14bpfhq64e9mu879v 4ax.com> References: <39.456217e2.2d8bfae4 aol.com> In-Reply-To: <39.456217e2.2d8bfae4 aol.com> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ultra5.eskimo.com id i2S6pxSD006611 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53761 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: In reply to Erikbaard aol.com's message of Fri, 19 Mar 2004 02:27:32 -0500 (EST): Hi, [snip] >http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/3520636.stm If the UFO is one of ours, then it should be in a fixed orbit, and hence the next occurrence is predictable. Just tell Spirit to look in the right spot when it comes around again (perhaps a couple of times?). If it never shows up, then it's one of their's. :) Regards, Robin van Spaandonk If "other people" can be denied their rights, then what's to stop someone claiming that you belong among the "other people"? From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 28 03:21:27 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2SBLNSD014616; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 03:21:23 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2SBLKCS014602; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 03:21:20 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 03:21:20 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <000801c414b7$59eea800$c864a8c0 win98> From: To: Cc: References: <000c01c41379$a9165480$c864a8c0@win98> <000401c41381$c5798180$c864a8c0@win98> Subject: Re: Life On Ice Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 14:25:06 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Resent-Message-ID: <2YH0G.A.DkD.wUrZAB ultra5.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53762 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: New pictures are posted showing microscopic pictures after 3 hours of grinding at http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/spirit_m082.html Grinding edges appears to expose these layers. Initial guess of ice look like be correct. Regards, hamdi ucar ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Sent: 27 March 2004 01:29 Subject: Re: Life On Ice > Finally found a transparent depth on this material! This not on the clean area > but below the crack. I switched between two images repeatedly and when the > background shades become aligned, surface dust moves. I had noted the surface > below the crack was not smooth earlier. It appears the "rock" have many layers. > the Upper layer on this image is a transparent thin layer having some dust > particles attached. This layer is bumpy. Below this layer is the muddy opaque > or semi opaque layer where the shades take places. This layer have flat upper > surface. Actually it is exposed above the crack. Small protrusion above the > crack appears not part of the layer but attached to the layer and possibly > detached by the force of the RAT without grinding. Still I do not understand how > RAT exposed these glassy layer without scratching it. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: > To: > Sent: 26 March 2004 23:30 > Subject: Re: Life On Ice > > > > Horace, > > I prepared two images for stereographic view from images > > marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/m/079/2M133386588EFF2232P2957M2M1.JPG > > and > > marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/m/079/2M133386244EFF2232P2957M2M1.JPG > > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 28 07:23:02 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2SFMwhs006680; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 07:22:58 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2SFMjxl006634; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 07:22:45 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 07:22:45 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <000501c414d8$6cdfbc30$775bccd1 MIKEBY3NR533HT> From: "Mike Carrell" To: References: <001501c4146b$4d0bed60$c864a8c0 win98> Subject: Re: Puzzled Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 10:21:59 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53763 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Hamdi Ucar wrote: > I am puzzled by these dark colored knotted or twisted string looking features > appearing in many soil microscopic pictures but marginally visible. I am puzzled > because they can be easily mixed by shadows and they appear always in crests, > not crossing over things. So it is difficult to find solid evidence they are > indeed some objects. There are also a similar things, black mesh like patches > take place also in crusts and having string like character. Despite these are > clearly visible, it is difficult to identify them as real objects. These items > appears never present on outside of crusts. For this reason they look like to > earth worm. I placed an pictures pointing possible features of these items. I > marked with blue some of them and with red some dark clusters and more > suspicious ones. The main problem, once I start to sport them they appears in > every place, and I start to suspect from false recognition. You are correct to be cautious in interpreting these images, for the human visual and nervous system is very good at pattern recognition, almost to the extent of seeing patterns were there are none, as costellations in the night sky. Also, essential details may be buried in the JPEG compression, which is lossy. Other images of the Martial soil are very granular, yet there are suggestions of straight lines amid the noise. Human vision is very sensitive to scale. Subtle features not seen close up may becoem obvious at a distance. The governing factor is the spatial frequency of the features in terms of angles of arc as projected from the eyeball to the object. To be 'scientific' or 'objective' one can devise spatial filters which will emphasize linear features amid the visual noise. Such filters exist in animal retinas. Some image processing programs, such as JASC Paint Shop Pro, allow the user to construct custom filter matrices -- this requires considerable know-how. If one studies what kinds of images stimulate retinas, prepare to be surprised. Frog eyes are very sensitive to dots moving inward, but not outward, which is good if you dine on flies. There are some twelve stages of parallel image processing between the human retina and the visual cortex at the back of the brain. It is very adventurous to rule out anything when inspecting Mars with the Rovers. The fact that apparently millions of people are looking at these images suggests that new questions will arise quickly and stimulate new missions and new instruments. Personally, I find no reason to reject organic origin of many of these features. Life exists on Earth in very 'hostile' environments and at very different metabolic rates. Regards, Mike Carrell From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 28 08:06:37 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2SG6Whs015021; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 08:06:33 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2SG6W47015006; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 08:06:32 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 08:06:32 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <4066F8A4.2040308 bellsouth.net> Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 11:09:08 -0500 From: Terry Blanton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Mars Methand (3rd try) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53764 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: (I have subscribed under a different email address to try to get this message through. Previous attempts have fallen down the vortex drain.) It's getting pretty difficult to deny, eh? http://news.independent.co.uk/world/science_medical/story.jsp?story=505454 From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 28 08:14:55 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2SGEnSD004052; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 08:14:49 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2SGElHJ004034; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 08:14:47 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 08:14:47 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <4066FA80.3030000 bellsouth.net> Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 11:17:04 -0500 From: Terry Blanton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Mars Methand (3rd try) References: <4066F8A4.2040308 bellsouth.net> In-Reply-To: <4066F8A4.2040308 bellsouth.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53765 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: The title should say "Methane". Terry Blanton wrote: > (I have subscribed under a different email address to try to get this > message through. Previous attempts have fallen down the vortex drain.) > > It's getting pretty difficult to deny, eh? > > http://news.independent.co.uk/world/science_medical/story.jsp?story=505454 > > > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 28 08:15:21 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2SGFDSD004192; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 08:15:14 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2SGFDCF004175; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 08:15:13 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 08:15:13 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <4066FAA8.8010407 rtpatlanta.com> Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 11:17:44 -0500 From: Terry Blanton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Test Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53766 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Test. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 28 08:31:30 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2SGVLSD008794; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 08:31:21 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2SGVKXX008773; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 08:31:20 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 08:31:20 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <003301c414e1$e831ee40$8837fea9 cpq> From: "Jones Beene" To: References: <4066F8A4.2040308 bellsouth.net> Subject: Re: Mars Methand (3rd try) Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 08:29:31 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ultra5.eskimo.com id i2SGVHSD008754 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53767 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: ----- Original Message ----- From: "Terry Blanton" > (I have subscribed under a different email address to try to get this > message through. Previous attempts have fallen down the vortex drain.) > > It's getting pretty difficult to deny, eh? > > http://news.independent.co.uk/world/science_medical/story.jsp?story=505454 Worm gas? I also posted a message yesterday that must have been eaten up by an anonymous spam filter in cyberspace, so this is really just a test to see if I will have to repost the bit of 'hot air' again.... Jones From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 28 09:17:36 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2SHHSSD021110; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 09:17:28 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2SHHQ0f021096; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 09:17:26 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 09:17:26 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <001301c414e8$59c57ee0$8837fea9 cpq> From: "Jones Beene" To: Subject: Fw: The myth of lattice coupling and He ratios Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 09:16:03 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ultra5.eskimo.com id i2SHHOSD021076 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53768 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: This is a revised posting from a similar one yesterday that didn't get through. Why penalize good experimental results with a lame theory? The only unambiguous characteristic of fusion reactions is gamma radiation. Period. If you have no gammas and want to invoke phonon or lattice coupling, then first set up an experiment where you can show that nuclear lattice coupling is high probability and happens most of the time in similar situations. Unfortunately, the relevant and obvious experiment has been performed and it is null. When one loads tritium into a Pd lattice, the decay gammas are still measurable and correlate well with what theory says they should be - how could this be true if Pd somehow promotes nuclear lattice coupling? Conclusion: nuclear lattice coupling is a myth. Isn't the problem obvious? We know that radioactive hydrogen (tritium) is not lattice-coupled in a Pd matrix and cannot be induced to couple, so how can the thousand-fold higher radiation levels of deuterium fusion be said to ever couple, and especially to couple so well that ZERO 24 MeV gammas can be measured? Sure, the element helium can conceivably be derived from an extremely unlikely form of fusion, but it is infinitely more likely to be found from a plethora of other innocuous sources. The appearance of helium is ALWAY ambiguous evidence for fusion, no matter how well it correlates to excess energy UNLESS the statistical correlation can be framed to be arguably absolute. In point of fact, the correlation is shaky even in those few excess-heat experiments where helium is found in rough proportion to excess energy, but most damning is that in much, probably most of the highest quality CF work done in the 1990s, the major ash component was tritium, such as found in careful experiments done by Claytor and others with almost no helium except that which decayed from tritium. Tritium, of course, releases gamma radiation. Helium is ubiquitous- not surprising since it is the second most common element in the universe; it is found everywhere on earth, in air, natural gas, all kinds of radioactive decay and in many manufactured product where natural gas was used in processing, such as stainless steel and the rubber seals of vacuum chambers. Also, in testing there are pitfalls - to detect He in a mass spec is somewhat difficult because of the mass similarity to molecular deuterium. That problem would fall under the category of "measurement error" and is not relevant to broader theoretical implications. Helium is also the smallest molecule (since the molecule is monatomic) and so mobile and hard to contain or EXCLUDE from any container, in that it can go INTO any vacuum chamber from environmental air over time. This mass transfer process doesn't require a loose seal necessarily, as many metals are porous to helium, especially after mechanical degradation, such as years of flexing every time you start up the turbo pump. The air we breathe consists of one part in 200,000 helium, but in trying to "rewrite" mother nature, you will find some researchers who will say that it is less than that, or even "de minimis" - so that its real ubiquity is ignored so as to better fit into an agenda. Sorry, helium is one part in 200,000 in air which means that for every breath you take, you will exhale approximately 500,000,000,000,000,000 helium atoms. If this was found to be in rough correlation to the energy your body was burning during that breath (actually it is not far off) does that then mean that your metabolism was working on D+D fusion? I think not. Consequently to say that helium was found in rough proportion to excess energy in a ratio of one million helium atoms for every for every 38 ergs of excess energy in a particular experiment, will appear to a skeptic of cold fusion as really meaningless, and therefore the explanation itself may tend to negate the excellent experimental results. In short, the experimenter would be better off to NOT choose that explanation... perhaps, not to even look for helium in the first place. When one becomes so tied to a particular principle, and so desirous to invoke the "fusion" explanation for findings of excess energy, but can find no high energy photons (which cannot be hidden if they were there) and which are the only unambiguous characteristic of fusion reactions, then there is a great incentive to grasp at other explanations to cope with this problem. A current favorite rationalization for this is to say that the energy emission is effectively "coupled to the lattice." But is there any evidence for this happening elsewhere in all of physics? Yes, if you google such phrases as "lattice coupling" you will get several thousand hits ! So, has a proper defense for lack of gammas been magically found? Only if you don't read on to find that almost all of that research involves ELECTRON-LATTICE coupling, not nuclear coupling. Outside of the cold fusion arena, I can find no good references to the existence of high probability nuclear coupling - that is, there exist some kinds of extremely low energy (Mossbauer effect) and/or low probability phenomena are said to be evidence of lattice coupling. That is doubtful in itself, but for the sake of argument, lets say it is evidence of nuclear coupling. In the Mossbauer effect, look carefully at the ratio- one may get one coupling per million atoms depending on how low a temperature you have, and even so - is that process transferable to CF, and wouldn't it still leave lots of detectable 24 MeV gammas from deuterium fusion, not to mention the secondaries. In effect, you would still have the dead graduate assistant unless the coupling cross-section could be pushed extremely high, which will never happen at elevated temperature. Inside the CF area - if you look at the old Sci.physics.fusion arguments such as those by dyed-in-the-wool skeptic Richard Blue (who I find it a bit detestable to quote, except that in this case he is correct), you will find this following argument. Unfortunately there has been little effective counter-argument to his main contention on the extreme rarity of nuclear lattice-coupling. "Both Mitchell Swartz and Bob Cormach seem to want to apply a simple null test to this question. For them the lattice-nucleus coupling either exists or it does not exist. Then as their logic would have it, any demonstration of the existence of this coupling in even one case is sufficient to "prove" that cold fusion is really occurring wherever we want it to occur. No further test of the cold fusion hypothesis is required!" "The Swartz approach to the lattice-nucleus coupling is not acceptable physics in my book. I acknowledge that there are many circumstances in which such couplings are clearly demonstrated. In fact a great deal of nuclear physics and solid state physics investigations have made use of this couplings as probes to investigate some very intricate details of nuclear and/or atomic structures. As a prime example one need only mention Nuclear Magnetic Resonance - MRI to some of you perhaps. I also would not leave out Mitchell's favorite, Mossbauer Effect." "What I would suggest is that we need to move beyond the mere existence of a nuclear-lattice coupling to a discussion of the quantitative aspects of such couplings. If one assigns an energy scale to the various known couplings there is a pattern that is worth noting. The energies involved in nuclear-lattice couplings are not very big. They don't have very large effects on the nuclear states involved. Now is such experimental data something we can simply ignore? I claim that all the experimental data that addresses this question has to be considered and given weight appropriately along with the CF calorimetry data. To my mind it defies logic to assert that this body of experimental data should be ignored in this discussion. The evidence clearly indicates that nuclear-lattice couplings are, at most, small perturbations on nuclear states. Is there anyone who would challenge that statement as a good summary for the vast body of data available?" END of quote I think anyone can easily see that two points have been made in this and other related posts (and never countered effectively). The points are that outside of cold fusion, that nuclear lattice-coupling is a low energy. low probability phenomenon - far from a "bulk" or common event. For it to be the prime reason that gammas are not found would imply that it happens *most of the time* in CF, but nowhere else in all of physics - as even in the best of circumstances it is a rare event. Moreover, the 24 MeV photon is so incredibly potent and detectable (and deadly) that it would stick out like a sore thumb in situations where many joules of excess heat were released unless the coupling were nearly absolute. Bottom line - by invoking lattice coupling, the apologist is piggybacking one even more debilitating controversy on top of another. Why penalize your good experimental results with such a lame theory? Jones From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 28 09:26:38 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2SHQTSD022762; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 09:26:29 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2SHQSWP022746; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 09:26:28 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 09:26:28 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <002901c414e1$5a9492e0$0c81b341 computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: Subject: Re: Mars Methand (3rd try) Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 10:25:55 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-ELNK-Trace: 0b1c9d71006e06a171639b933de7ae6f7e972de0d01da940362d93b312bf3f91b3f4976519faf44f350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53769 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Terry Blanton wrote: > It's getting pretty difficult to deny, eh? http://news.independent.co.uk/world/science_medical/story.jsp?story=505454 Lots of non-biological (pre-life) possibilities for the Mars methane arise when water seeps down and reacts with the Acetylides and Methanides (" Reactive/Refractory Carbides, Nitrides, Cyanides, Star Stuff") buried below the Martian crust. "The acetylides, most important of which is calcium carbide, form acetylene by reaction with water or acids. Another group, consisting of aluminum, beryllium, and manganese carbides, is termed the methanides. These yield methane on reaction with water or acids." The refractory Carbides (and Nitrides/Cyanides) are inorganic materials that form organic compounds such as methane and acetylene; etc., that can exothermally form sugars, and amino acids when they are exposed to water/ammonia-water, the precursors of the RNA-DNA in life forms. Regards, Frederick From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 28 10:02:01 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2SI1vhs011435; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 10:01:58 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2SI1t3Y011423; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 10:01:55 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 10:01:55 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f From: "explorecraft" To: Subject: Testing voting machines Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 01:00:12 +0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 In-Reply-To: <4066FAA8.8010407 rtpatlanta.com> Importance: Normal X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - lester.switchfusion.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - eskimo.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - explorecraft.com Resent-Message-ID: <41mz2.A.ayC.TMxZAB ultra6.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53770 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Testing a new polling format for those interested. It is being roughly developed at: http://www.explorecraft.com/poll/Pres_Vote_Log.php For anyone interested in how this would work, I would discuss it off vortex at http://explorecraft.com/forum :sociophysics. I intend to map the data as it develops, I have recently managed to get a Wave Phenomena progaam (CSU) program to function on my linux machine. Mapping 3 dimensional data should be a snap with this. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 28 10:51:09 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2SIp4SD009099; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 10:51:04 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2SIp2fZ009073; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 10:51:02 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 10:51:02 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <40671F29.2070200 rtpatlanta.com> Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 13:53:29 -0500 From: Terry Blanton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Mars Methand (3rd try) References: <002901c414e1$5a9492e0$0c81b341 computer> In-Reply-To: <002901c414e1$5a9492e0$0c81b341 computer> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53771 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Frederick Sparber wrote: >Lots of non-biological (pre-life) possibilities for the Mars methane arise when water >seeps down and reacts with the Acetylides and Methanides (" Reactive/Refractory >Carbides, Nitrides, Cyanides, Star Stuff") buried below the Martian crust. > Yes, but this is not sustainable indefinately. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 28 11:08:14 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2SJ8Ahs025987; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 11:08:10 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2SJ88HO025970; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 11:08:08 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 11:08:08 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <40672374.C1DA1FC7 ix.netcom.com> Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 11:11:48 -0800 From: Edmund Storms Organization: Energy K System X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77C-CCK-MCD {C-UDP; EBM-APPLE} (Macintosh; U; PPC) X-Accept-Language: en,pdf MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Fw: The myth of lattice coupling and He ratios References: <001301c414e8$59c57ee0$8837fea9 cpq> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ultra6.eskimo.com id i2SJ87hs025920 Resent-Message-ID: <2W0TBB.A.pVG.YKyZAB ultra6.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53772 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Jones Beene wrote: > This is a revised posting from a similar one yesterday that didn't get through. > > Why penalize good experimental results with a lame theory? The only unambiguous characteristic of fusion reactions is gamma radiation. Period. Well Jones, I'm glad you made this very clear. Nevertheless, certain facts do not go away. Energy is detected, He is detected, and gamma is not detected. Therefore, you conclude that the energy and He do not result from fusion. It is pure coincidence that the ratio of energy to amount of He is close to what would be expected from fusion. After reading what you say below, you apparently simply reject the helium. I wonder why you don't also reject the energy as well. > > > If you have no gammas and want to invoke phonon or lattice coupling, then first set up an experiment where you can show that nuclear lattice coupling is high probability and happens most of the time in similar situations. As far as I know there are no similar situations except perhaps for the Mφssbauer effect. > > > Unfortunately, the relevant and obvious experiment has been performed and it is null. When one loads tritium into a Pd lattice, the decay gammas are still measurable and correlate well with what theory says they should be - how could this be true if Pd somehow promotes nuclear lattice coupling? Conclusion: nuclear lattice coupling is a myth. I do not know what you mean here. Tritium has no decay gamma. It is a pure beta emitter. If you want some evidence that the decay energy of tritium might be affected by the lattice in which it resides, check out the early work of Reifenschweiler, not the current paper in IE. > > > Isn't the problem obvious? We know that radioactive hydrogen (tritium) is not lattice-coupled in a Pd matrix and cannot be induced to couple, so how can the thousand-fold higher radiation levels of deuterium fusion be said to ever couple, and especially to couple so well that ZERO 24 MeV gammas can be measured? > > > Sure, the element helium can conceivably be derived from an extremely unlikely form of fusion, but it is infinitely more likely to be found from a plethora of other innocuous sources. The appearance of helium is ALWAY ambiguous evidence for fusion, no matter how well it correlates to excess energy UNLESS the statistical correlation can be framed to be arguably absolute. In point of fact, the correlation is shaky even in those few excess-heat experiments where helium is found in rough proportion to excess energy, but most damning is that in much, probably most of the highest quality CF work done in the 1990s, the major ash component was tritium, such as found in careful experiments done by Claytor and others with almost no helium except that which decayed from tritium. Tritium, of course, releases gamma radiation. Here you reveal a value judgment that I don't share. I believe that the growing body of He-4 measurements show a consistent relationship to heat production. The He-3 and tritium measurements show no relationship to measured energy production. > > > Helium is ubiquitous- not surprising since it is the second most common element in the universe; it is found everywhere on earth, in air, natural gas, all kinds of radioactive decay and in many manufactured product where natural gas was used in processing, such as stainless steel and the rubber seals of vacuum chambers. Also, in testing there are pitfalls - to detect He in a mass spec is somewhat difficult because of the mass similarity to molecular deuterium. That problem would fall under the category of "measurement error" and is not relevant to broader theoretical implications. People who measure helium know all of this. Nevertheless, the element has been measured with a demonstrated accuracy sufficient to show that anomalous He is being produced. Of course, if a person does not want to believe He-4 is real, these old canards are always available. > > > Helium is also the smallest molecule (since the molecule is monatomic) and so mobile and hard to contain or EXCLUDE from any container, in that it can go INTO any vacuum chamber from environmental air over time. This mass transfer process doesn't require a loose seal necessarily, as many metals are porous to helium, especially after mechanical degradation, such as years of flexing every time you start up the turbo pump. This statement is simply not true as anyone who has used a leak detector can testify. If this were true, finding a leak in a vacuum system using helium would be impossible. The amount of helium detected as resulting from LENR is far in excess of any detected leak. > > > The air we breathe consists of one part in 200,000 helium, but in trying to "rewrite" mother nature, you will find some researchers who will say that it is less than that, or even "de minimis" - so that its real ubiquity is ignored so as to better fit into an agenda. Sorry, helium is one part in 200,000 in air which means that for every breath you take, you will exhale approximately 500,000,000,000,000,000 helium atoms. If this was found to be in rough correlation to the energy your body was burning during that breath (actually it is not far off) does that then mean that your metabolism was working on D+D fusion? I think not. People who measure helium also measure it in their laboratory air. McKubre finds the concentration to be about 5.8 ppm. The concentration in a gas can be detected at levels below a ppb. Leaks can be easily detected and sealed to achieve this concentration of helium in any device. Helium detection is a well developed and well understood method. It is amazing to me that you make arguments that might have been true 20 years ago, but have no reality now. > > > Consequently to say that helium was found in rough proportion to excess energy in a ratio of one million helium atoms for every for every 38 ergs of excess energy in a particular experiment, will appear to a skeptic of cold fusion as really meaningless, and therefore the explanation itself may tend to negate the excellent experimental results. In short, the experimenter would be better off to NOT choose that explanation... perhaps, not to even look for helium in the first place. > > When one becomes so tied to a particular principle, and so desirous to invoke the "fusion" explanation for findings of excess energy, but can find no high energy photons (which cannot be hidden if they were there) and which are the only unambiguous characteristic of fusion reactions, then there is a great incentive to grasp at other explanations to cope with this problem. A current favorite rationalization for this is to say that the energy emission is effectively "coupled to the lattice." But is there any evidence for this happening elsewhere in all of physics? The Mφssbauer effect. > > > Yes, if you google such phrases as "lattice coupling" you will get several thousand hits ! So, has a proper defense for lack of gammas been magically found? Only if you don't read on to find that almost all of that research involves ELECTRON-LATTICE coupling, not nuclear coupling. Outside of the cold fusion arena, I can find no good references to the existence of high probability nuclear coupling - that is, there exist some kinds of extremely low energy (Mossbauer effect) and/or low probability phenomena are said to be evidence of lattice coupling. That is doubtful in itself, but for the sake of argument, lets say it is evidence of nuclear coupling. In the Mossbauer effect, look carefully at the ratio- one may get one coupling per million atoms depending on how low a temperature you have, and even so - is that process transferable to CF, and wouldn't it still leave lots of detectable 24 MeV gammas from deuterium fusion, not to mention the secondaries. In effect, you would st! > ill have the dead graduate assistant unless the coupling cross-section could be pushed extremely high, which will never happen at elevated temperature. I grant you that the coupling problem is a difficult one. A number of people have proposed imaginative solutions. However, because it is difficult to imagine, does not make it not happen. Unless you reject the helium measurements, as you try to do, a person who wants to reject coupling has a serious problem. > > > Inside the CF area - if you look at the old Sci.physics.fusion arguments such as those by dyed-in-the-wool skeptic Richard Blue (who I find it a bit detestable to quote, except that in this case he is correct), you will find this following argument. Unfortunately there has been little effective counter-argument to his main contention on the extreme rarity of nuclear lattice-coupling. > > "Both Mitchell Swartz and Bob Cormach seem to want to apply a simple null test to this question. For them the lattice-nucleus coupling either exists or it does not exist. Then as their logic would have it, any demonstration of the existence of this coupling in even one case is sufficient to "prove" that cold fusion is really occurring wherever we want it to occur. No further test of the cold fusion hypothesis is required!" > > "The Swartz approach to the lattice-nucleus coupling is not acceptable physics in my book. I acknowledge that there are many circumstances in which such couplings are clearly demonstrated. In fact a great deal of nuclear physics and solid state physics investigations have made use of this couplings as probes to investigate some very intricate details of nuclear and/or atomic structures. As a prime example one need only mention Nuclear Magnetic Resonance - MRI to some of you perhaps. I also would not leave out Mitchell's favorite, Mossbauer Effect." > > "What I would suggest is that we need to move beyond the mere existence of a nuclear-lattice coupling to a discussion of the quantitative aspects of such couplings. If one assigns an energy scale to the various known couplings there is a pattern that is worth noting. The energies involved in nuclear-lattice couplings are not very big. They don't have very large effects on the nuclear states involved. Now is such experimental data something we can simply ignore? I claim that all the experimental data that addresses this question has to be considered and given weight appropriately along with the CF calorimetry data. To my mind it defies logic to assert that this body of experimental data should be ignored in this discussion. The evidence clearly indicates that nuclear-lattice couplings are, at most, small perturbations on nuclear states. Is there anyone who would challenge that statement as a good summary for the vast > body of data available?" END of quote > > I think anyone can easily see that two points have been made in this and other related posts (and never countered effectively). The points are that outside of cold fusion, that nuclear lattice-coupling is a low energy. low probability phenomenon - far from a "bulk" or common event. For it to be the prime reason that gammas are not found would imply that it happens *most of the time* in CF, but nowhere else in all of physics - as even in the best of circumstances it is a rare event. Moreover, the 24 MeV photon is so incredibly potent and detectable (and deadly) that it would stick out like a sore thumb in situations where many joules of excess heat were released unless the coupling were nearly absolute. > > Bottom line - by invoking lattice coupling, the apologist is piggybacking one even more debilitating controversy on top of another. > > Why penalize your good experimental results with such a lame theory? If you accept that both energy and helium exist and are related, then the released nuclear energy has to get from the place where helium is made and into the general lattice. Some people propose direct coupling, which you reject. Other people propose alpha emission from a nuclei created by another process. The imagination has not yet been exhausted. The problem you have to deal with is just which part of the experimental claims you want to reject in order to avoid a coupling theory. The only penalty is rejecting the truth to avoid having to accept the impossible. Ed > > > Jones > > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 28 11:28:12 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2SJS2SD015286; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 11:28:03 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2SJS1mE015268; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 11:28:01 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 11:28:01 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <406727D6.9030801 rtpatlanta.com> Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 14:30:30 -0500 From: Terry Blanton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Mars Methand (3rd try) References: <002901c414e1$5a9492e0$0c81b341 computer> <40671F29.2070200@rtpatlanta.com> In-Reply-To: <40671F29.2070200 rtpatlanta.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53773 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Terry Blanton wrote: > > > Frederick Sparber wrote: > >> Lots of non-biological (pre-life) possibilities for the Mars methane >> arise when water >> seeps down and reacts with the Acetylides and Methanides (" >> Reactive/Refractory >> Carbides, Nitrides, Cyanides, Star Stuff") buried below the Martian >> crust. >> > > Yes, but this is not sustainable indefinately. Either way, it explains the UFO that Hamdi spotted -- Swamp Gas! From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 28 11:40:35 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2SJeSSD018002; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 11:40:29 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2SJeRCq017986; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 11:40:27 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 11:40:27 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 10:46:35 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: LENT-CANR - too little too late? Resent-Message-ID: <88LddD.A.5YE.royZAB ultra5.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53774 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: More news on global warming: The effects of this CO2 increase are nominal compared to the feedback effects what will happen if the arctic and the oceans warm up enough for a significant release (from clatherates) of their methane, which is a vastly more powerful greenhouse gas. In fact, a methane release ulitmately results in CO2 formation, so an unexplained rise in CO2 may be in itself be an indication of a significant methane release. Atmospheric methane monitoring may be even more important than CO2 monitoring. It is a sad fact that the best available immediate protector of the environment is OPEC. A high price for energy is the only thing that can presently make for the changes in infrastructure that are necessary. It is too bad the general public is either ignorant or as stupid and stubborn as a mule that must get a board across the head to move. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 28 12:16:42 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2SKGchs009032; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 12:16:38 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2SKGYOf009005; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 12:16:34 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 12:16:34 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 11:22:44 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: Life On Ice Resent-Message-ID: <0cunCD.A.pMC.iKzZAB ultra6.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53775 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 2:25 PM 3/28/4, wrote: >New pictures are posted showing microscopic pictures after 3 hours of grinding >at >http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/spirit_m082.html > >Grinding edges appears to expose these layers. Initial guess of ice look >like be >correct. Pretty dramtic photos! It is ironic, but the stuff in the new photos looks even more like ice in that it appears to show internal bubbles and crystaline salts formed upon freezing, yet the changes in focal plane appear to not show that any features are below the surface. It is as if there has been a cross-section taken though the ice which has an opaque surface, which I suppose one would expect from grinding ice. The best way to tell if it is ice is to push a heated part up against it and see what kind of mark that makes, but I suppose that is not likely to happen. One thing of interest is that some of the "bubbles" appear to have a cross sectioned tube in the middle of them. It is as if a root or twig or worm or something in hollow tube form were chopped in half. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 28 12:28:48 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2SKSghs011279; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 12:28:43 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2SKSgXh011259; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 12:28:42 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 12:28:42 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 11:34:56 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: Asteroid flyby tonight Resent-Message-ID: <6H8ibD.A.2vC.6VzZAB ultra6.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53776 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 4:48 PM 3/28/4, Robin van Spaandonk wrote: >In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Tue, 23 Mar 2004 15:07:18 -0900: >Hi, > >>At 7:55 PM 3/22/4, thomas malloy wrote: >>>How does the angle of incidence affect the amount of energy that the >>>asteroid would release? >> >> >>This seems like a trick question. 8^) >> >>All the caluclations provided earlier assume only the mechanical energy due >>to momentum gained by a meteor from approaching the earth. Mechanical >>energy is conserved, so there would be a fixed amount of energy expended >>from any impact under that scenario, regardless of the angle of incidence. >>That assumes actual impact, not a glancing blow of some kind, which would >>be very unlikely anyway. >[snip] >Perhaps Thomas was referring to the angle with relation to the Earth's >orbit around the Sun? If it approached in the plane of the ecliptic, in a >retrograde orbit, then you can add the velocity of the Earth (~30 km/sec) >to that of the meteor, which makes for a much bigger splash. Thomas would have to answer the question in regard to his intended meaning. However, the term "angle of incidence" that I used prior to his question I think clearly meant angle of incidence with respect to the earth's surface, which is completely independent of the mutual angle of the intersecting orbits. Yes, a retrograde orbit would provide somewhat larger maximum possible energy than a 90 degree mutual angle, but such an event is very unlikely unless the source of the impacting body is a Nemesis cloud. Retrograde orbit objects with orbits in the ecliptic are fairly rare. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 28 12:50:07 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2SKnvSD001346; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 12:49:57 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2SKnuus001332; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 12:49:56 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 12:49:56 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <000b01c41506$08c17620$8837fea9 cpq> From: "Jones Beene" To: References: <001301c414e8$59c57ee0$8837fea9 cpq> <40672374.C1DA1FC7@ix.netcom.com> Subject: Re: The myth of lattice coupling Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 12:48:32 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ultra5.eskimo.com id i2SKnrSD001312 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53777 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Hi Ed, I see that you are still not understanding, or at least resisting, the main point that I have been trying to make. This is probably my fault for not being specific enough. Let me try it again, line-by-line. > Well Jones, I'm glad you made this very clear. Nevertheless, certain facts do not go away. Energy is detected, He is detected, and gamma is not detected. So far, so good... ES: "Therefore, you conclude that the energy and He do not result from fusion." This is not true. I accept that lots of excess energy is detected. But if it comes from fusion, then it clearly it does not come from the kind of fusion that is known and accepted in physics. Therefore, it may be acceptable to the open-minded observer to conclude that the excess energy could be coming from a new (since 1989) and previously unknown type of fusion. But it is not acceptable in either logic, science or anecdote to conclude that "traditional fusion is responsible but that somehow the gammas are hidden by lattice interaction." Nuclear lattice-coupling, at least of the high probability variety, is a myth. It does not exist. I hope that is crystal clear. Yes, it could be a fusion-like reaction, to the degree that helium is found without outside contamination, but NO it cannot be fusion that is quenched by lattice-coupling. Lattice coupling on a scale that would hide all the 24 MeV gammas is an absolute myth. The logical proof of that statement has been presented. I don't know how to express it more succinctly than that. ES: "It is pure coincidence that the ratio of energy to amount of He is close to what would be expected from fusion. After reading what you say below, you apparently simply reject the helium. I wonder why you don't also reject the energy as well." I do not reject the energy. It might be coincidental or not. There is conflicting information on that. Some studies show a good correlation. In others there is excess energy but NO helium except that which decays from tritium. Are you saying Claytor's work is not cold fusion? > > If you have no gammas and want to invoke phonon or lattice coupling, then first set up an experiment where you can show that nuclear lattice coupling is high probability and happens most of the time in similar situations. > ES: "As far as I know there are no similar situations except perhaps for the Mφssbauer effect." The Mossbauer effect is absent at the temperatures of cold fusion. Simple as that. Even at cryogenic temperature, it may happen at low probability - approx one in every 10^6 interactions. If a Mossbauer-like effect were going on in cold fusion, it would screen only a few 24 MeV gammas. Most would still be detected!! > > Unfortunately, the relevant and obvious experiment has been performed and it is null. When one loads tritium into a Pd lattice, the decay gammas are still measurable and correlate well with what theory says they should be - how could this be true if Pd somehow promotes nuclear lattice coupling? Conclusion: nuclear lattice coupling is a myth. > ES: "I do not know what you mean here. Tritium has no decay gamma. It is a pure beta emitter. If you want some evidence that the decay energy of tritium might be affected by the lattice in which it resides, check out the early work of Reifenschweiler, not the current paper in IE." Ed, you are being difficult. Tritium is a beta emitter, of course, but secondary gammas and Auger cascades are copious and easily detectable. Check Claytor's results in any old Fusion Technology article. He looks at palladium cathodes and he sees copious emissions from the tritium secondaries. Simple as that. Yes, the gamma emission is secondary and at least a thousand times lower power than D+D but... IF the palladium was able to couple to the hydrogen nucleus in any way, you would see far fewer gammas from the tritium in CF cathodes. > > Isn't the problem obvious? We know that radioactive hydrogen (tritium) is not lattice-coupled in a Pd matrix and cannot be induced to couple, so how can the thousand-fold higher radiation levels of deuterium fusion be said to ever couple, and especially to couple so well that ZERO 24 MeV gammas can be measured? I notice you didn't respond to this point. If even a few percent of the 24 MeV gammas were detectable, then the situation would be different. > > Sure, the element helium can conceivably be derived from an extremely unlikely form of fusion, but it is infinitely more likely to be found from a plethora of other innocuous sources. The appearance of helium is ALWAY ambiguous evidence for fusion, no matter how well it correlates to excess energy UNLESS the statistical correlation can be framed to be arguably absolute. In point of fact, the correlation is shaky even in those few excess-heat experiments where helium is found in rough proportion to excess energy, but most damning is that in much, probably most of the highest quality CF work done in the 1990s, the major ash component was tritium, such as found in careful experiments done by Claytor and others with almost no helium except that which decayed from tritium. Tritium, of course, releases gamma radiation. > ES: "Here you reveal a value judgment that I don't share. I believe that the growing body of He-4 measurements show a consistent relationship to heat production. The He-3 and tritium measurements show no relationship to measured energy production." Ed, I agree that there is some correlation but that is beside the point. Either lattice coupling can shield MOST of the 24 MeV gammas or not. The conclusion of almost everyone in physics including those that accpet CFis that nuclear lattice-coupling a myth, and is a non-starter. Again, why penalize good experimental results with a lame and indefensible theory? Face the emerging fact, we are back at square one as to the underlying theory - which means that the experimenter may, or may not, be detecting *fusion* - but if you are detecting fusion, it is a previously unknown type of fusion that is different from any fusion reaction that was known before 1989. But it is not acceptable in either logic, science or anecdote to conclude that "traditional fusion is responsible but that somehow the gammas are hidden by lattice interaction." > "People who measure helium also measure it in their laboratory air. McKubre finds the concentration to be about 5.8 ppm." > > That is way lower than the generally accepted figure but even so, you will exhale approximately 20,000,000,000,000,000 helium atoms with every breath instead of the earlier figure... and if this was found to be in any small correlation to the energy your body was burning during that breath, does that then mean that your metabolism was utilizing D+D fusion? I think not. Again, it all gets back to the initial query: why would you penalize good experimental results with this ridiculous lattice-coupling theory? Regards, Jones From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 28 12:56:10 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2SKu6hs016915; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 12:56:07 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2SKu5KB016905; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 12:56:05 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 12:56:05 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 12:02:18 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: hidden Mazatzal pieces Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53778 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 6:51 PM 3/27/4, SnowDog wrote: >> In effect the bright spots could be reflections, but not like from a >single >> mirrored surface, but more like from bright blue snow. It appears the >> stuff is blue. Coincidentally glacial ice is also often blue, but ice on >> Mars, if any of the immediate subsurface stuff is ice, must have a lot of >> dissolved salts in it that may color it. > >How can you tell if something is blue? It appears the stuff is blue. It looks blue. Its hue is blue. It could be a variant of blue, like blue-grey, or further down the spectrum, like indigo, or violet, but it certainly is not red or orange. It shows up as very black through most of the filters except the blue end, where it is bright. There is no subtlety involved here that requires calibration data as far as I can see, at least in regard to its appearance. It looks reasonably certain if you were standing there it would have a bluish hue. It would not have a warm colored hue. A blue sky can turn a white object blue, but it can't turn a red object blue. The stuff looks to me like its coloration could be that of glacial ice, especially glacial ice with a touch of copper sulfate, possibly greyed-out by crystalized sulfate particles. >Without access to the calibration >data, the only way to determine if something is blue is to calibrate the sky >against the mirrors on the color wheel, for that day, or to try to calibrate >a spot in the soil against the spectra analysis made by JPL on Day 3. Each >filtered image has its maximum and minimum values adjusted to the highest >and lowest values possible, to improve the compression performance before >transmission. Because the blue filtered image is the darkest, it's value is >exagerated the most in the filtered image. We need calibration data, which >we don't have, to bring the color back to the correct value. Well, yes, you need calibration data to determine the true color or true spectrum of an object. However, I am just talking appearance, what the camera sees under the current lighting conditions. The appearance certainly has a strong blue hue, and no redish hue. No reasonable amount of lighting condition change can make a thin atmosphere turn a red color blue. The stuff must have a fairly strong blue hue, or else it is white and the sky is very very blue, which seems unlikely. It is hindsight, but a small flash attachment would not have required much weight and could have done wonders for determination of true colors. It would also have facilitated night operations, but that will only be really important to future better powered robots. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 28 13:10:02 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2SL9whs019129; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 13:09:58 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2SL9vbP019115; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 13:09:57 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 13:09:57 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f From: Robin van Spaandonk To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Asteroid flyby tonight Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 07:09:56 +1000 Organization: Improving Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ultra6.eskimo.com id i2SL9shs019078 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53779 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Sun, 28 Mar 2004 11:34:56 -0900: Hi, [snip] >Thomas would have to answer the question in regard to his intended meaning. >However, the term "angle of incidence" that I used prior to his question I >think clearly meant angle of incidence with respect to the earth's surface, >which is completely independent of the mutual angle of the intersecting >orbits. > >Yes, a retrograde orbit would provide somewhat larger maximum possible >energy than a 90 degree mutual angle, but such an event is very unlikely >unless the source of the impacting body is a Nemesis cloud. Retrograde >orbit objects with orbits in the ecliptic are fairly rare. [snip] BTW there is an animation of the orbit of the latest to pass our way (since the one mentioned above, and even closer) at http://www.hohmanntransfer.com/mn/0403/26.htm#bits2 Regards, Robin van Spaandonk If "other people" can be denied their rights, then what's to stop someone claiming that you belong among the "other people"? From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 28 13:21:32 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2SLLSRS022824; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 13:21:28 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2SLLR1d022812; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 13:21:27 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 13:21:27 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <004101c4150b$3761db00$c864a8c0 win98> From: To: References: Subject: Re: hidden Mazatzal pieces Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 00:25:26 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Resent-Message-ID: <_SaztC.A.YkF.WH0ZAB ultra6.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53780 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: ----- Original Message ----- From: "Horace Heffner" To: Sent: 29 March 2004 00:02 Subject: Re: hidden Mazatzal pieces > >How can you tell if something is blue? > > > It appears the stuff is blue. It looks blue. Its hue is blue. It could > be a variant of blue, like blue-grey, or further down the spectrum, like > indigo, or violet, but it certainly is not red or orange. It shows up as > very black through most of the filters except the blue end, where it is > bright. It appear lighter in 535nm filter in green section of the spectrum, therefore it could be also turquoise. > The stuff looks to me like its > coloration could be that of glacial ice, especially glacial ice with a > touch of copper sulfate, possibly greyed-out by crystalized sulfate > particles. Spread dust around by RAT suggest the material is highly opaque, therefore a chemical composition rather than colored ice. If you recall my previous analysis a concluded there was multiple layers, and the top layer is transparent, second layer is opaque, which is clearly seen in these photos, and the blue dust should be belong to this layer. [snip] > Regards, > > Horace Heffner > Regards, hamdi ucar From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 28 13:25:26 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2SLPLRS023646; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 13:25:21 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2SLPLeR023632; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 13:25:21 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 13:25:21 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <005c01c41502$bdb09240$0c81b341 computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: References: <002901c414e1$5a9492e0$0c81b341 computer> <40671F29.2070200@rtpatlanta.com> Subject: Re: Mars Methand (3rd try) Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 14:24:55 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-ELNK-Trace: 0b1c9d71006e06a171639b933de7ae6f7e972de0d01da94009900977eb12bcbc89952991b34aa2b1350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53781 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Terry wrote: > > Frederick Sparber wrote: > > >Lots of non-biological (pre-life) possibilities for the Mars methane arise when water > >seeps down and reacts with the Acetylides and Methanides (" Reactive/Refractory > >Carbides, Nitrides, Cyanides, Star Stuff") buried below the Martian crust. > > > > Yes, but this is not sustainable indefinitely. > It could last out the 4.5 billion year age of Mars, just like "Old Faithful". With the molten iron core half the size of it lots of possibilities for volcanic pipes to contend with. http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/releases/2003/32.cfm "In addition to detection of a liquid core for Mars, the results indicate the size of the core is about one-half the size of the planet, as is the case for Earth and Venus, and that the core has a significant fraction of a lighter element such as sulfur." Also a possibility of Water-Carbon Dioxide reactions with molten sulfur that can release hydrogen that can react with the carbonyl sulfide (COS) to produce methane. Time will tell. :-) Regards, Frederick From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 28 13:45:27 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2SLjNRS027788; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 13:45:23 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2SLjNwg027777; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 13:45:23 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 13:45:23 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <004801c4150e$9222dbe0$c864a8c0 win98> From: To: References: <001501c4146b$4d0bed60$c864a8c0 win98> <000501c414d8$6cdfbc30$775bccd1@MIKEBY3NR533HT> Subject: Re: Puzzled Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 00:49:27 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Resent-Message-ID: <3MH_oB.A.5xG.yd0ZAB ultra6.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53782 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Carrell" To: Sent: 28 March 2004 18:21 Subject: Re: Puzzled > Hamdi Ucar wrote: > > > I am puzzled by these dark colored knotted or twisted string looking features > > appearing in many soil microscopic pictures but marginally visible. I am puzzled > > because they can be easily mixed by shadows and they appear always in crests, > > not crossing over things. So it is difficult to find solid evidence they are > > indeed some objects. There are also a similar things, black mesh like patches > > take place also in crusts and having string like character. [snip] > It is very adventurous to rule out anything when inspecting Mars with the > Rovers. The fact that apparently millions of people are looking at these > images suggests that new questions will arise quickly and stimulate new > missions and new instruments. Personally, I find no reason to reject organic > origin of many of these features. Life exists on Earth in very 'hostile' > environments and at very different metabolic rates. > > Regards, > Mike Carrell > > Answer IS "Black Forest - Brian's Choice", which took in place of the soil pictures chosen by NASA, found on Mars rovers front page! On the medium or the large version of this image, it can seen varieties of things including these earth worm features at the lower right. These are not simply cracks in sand or illusions, the look like but better to something alive, able to advance on and under the soil, pushing it, like worm or plant root. The unique perspective of this shot give very good sight. I guess the "Brian's Choice" is indeed a very good choice. :) I also noticed the large picture of these shots have better resolution than raw images. ??? Regards, hamdi ucar From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 28 14:10:27 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2SMANRS001601; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 14:10:23 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2SMAM97001588; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 14:10:22 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 14:10:22 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <007801c41511$78d6b1e0$f8ffa8c0 Craig> From: "SnowDog" To: References: <004101c4150b$3761db00$c864a8c0@win98> Subject: Re: hidden Mazatzal pieces Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 16:10:25 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53783 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: > > It appears the stuff is blue. It looks blue. Its hue is blue. It could > > be a variant of blue, like blue-grey, or further down the spectrum, like > > indigo, or violet, but it certainly is not red or orange. It shows up as > > very black through most of the filters except the blue end, where it is > > bright. > > It appear lighter in 535nm filter in green section of the spectrum, therefore > it could be also turquoise. But this is my point. The images taken through the shorter wavelength filters, are generally made much brighter than the images taken through the longer wavelength filters. The apparent blue colors are completely and totally artificial in most cases. Though the image in the blue filter is brighter, it is much darker in actuality because the blue image is brightened so much more. I made two colored images of the spot. The first is how it would appear with no adjustment of the blue and green filtered images. The second is adjusted as most images of the soil are required to be adjusted. http://www.golddirectory.com/mars/mars9.htm I think the spot is probably black. Craig From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 28 14:43:49 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2SMhjRS008034; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 14:43:45 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2SMhici007998; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 14:43:44 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 14:43:44 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <410-22004302822475650 ix.netcom.com> X-Priority: 3 Reply-To: aki ix.netcom.com X-Mailer: EarthLink MailBox 2004.1.42.0 (Windows) From: "Akira Kawasaki" To: "vortex-l eskimo.com" Subject: Land of the brave and free??!! Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 14:47:05 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_84815C5ABAF209EF376268C8" X-ELNK-Trace: c4cc7f5f697e8746f66dc3a06d5924d811f3f60da2389daae2aa15683368cb474e508857176a6fc1350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53784 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: ------=_NextPart_84815C5ABAF209EF376268C8 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII March 29, 2004 Vortex, Drudge Report has posted a New Orleans- based 5th Circuit Court of Appeals (federal) decision. Immediately, police officers in Louisiana no longer need a search or arrest warrant to conduct a brief searech of your home or business. Sign of the times for the rest of the country and citizenry? -ak- ------=_NextPart_84815C5ABAF209EF376268C8 Content-Type: text/html; charset=US-ASCII

March 29, 2004
 
Vortex,
 
Drudge Report has posted a New Orleans- based 5th Circuit Court of Appeals (federal) decision.  Immediately, police officers in Louisiana no longer need a search or arrest warrant to conduct a brief searech of your home or business.
Sign of the times for the rest of the country and citizenry?
 
-ak- 
------=_NextPart_84815C5ABAF209EF376268C8-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 28 15:18:11 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2SNI6th030135; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 15:18:07 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2SNI4aX030118; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 15:18:04 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 15:18:04 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f From: Robin van Spaandonk To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Fw: The myth of lattice coupling and He ratios Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 09:18:00 +1000 Organization: Improving Message-ID: References: <001301c414e8$59c57ee0$8837fea9 cpq> In-Reply-To: <001301c414e8$59c57ee0$8837fea9 cpq> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ultra5.eskimo.com id i2SNI0th030065 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53785 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: In reply to Jones Beene's message of Sun, 28 Mar 2004 09:16:03 -0800: Hi, [snip] In reply to Jones Beene's message of Sun, 28 Mar 2004 09:16:03 -0800: Hi, [snip] >Why penalize good experimental results with a lame theory? The only unambiguous characteristic of fusion reactions is gamma radiation. Period. Yesterday I posted a theoretical mechanism[1] which would result in energetic alphas (and perhaps energetic electrons) rather than gamma rays. 1. See thread "Another possible helium producing mechanism"] > >If you have no gammas and want to invoke phonon or lattice coupling, then first set up an experiment where you can show that nuclear lattice coupling is high probability and happens most of the time in similar situations. > >Unfortunately, the relevant and obvious experiment has been performed and it is null. When one loads tritium into a Pd lattice, the decay gammas are still measurable and correlate well with what theory says they should be - how could this be true if Pd somehow promotes nuclear lattice coupling? Conclusion: nuclear lattice coupling is a myth. It could easily happen, if only a small percentage of the decays couple to the lattice, while the rest are normal, in which case, one would be measuring the normal component. Furthermore, the question needs to be asked, whether or not the "CF effect" occurred at all in the above experiment? If not, then it is just one of the many null experiments, and hence contributes nothing to our overall knowledge. In order for a change in T decay to be useful, one would need to determine whether or not there was a decrease in gammas from T decay while excess heat production / transmutation was in progress. Even this may not be measurable, since likely only a very small percentage of the T would be reacting at any one time, and consequently the change in decay rate would be barely perceptible. Furthermore, you appear to make the assumption that a tight coupling would eliminate the gammas. This is not the case, see the Mφssbauer effect, in which they are not eliminated, but rather the energy spectrum shifts. (BTW if T is used instead of D then there should be spare neutrons floating around from the reaction T + T -> He4 + 2n. Absorption of these neutrons by Pd nuclei should result in gammas with a measurably different energy. This in itself would be a sensitive test to the presence of a CF reaction, not to mention that the neutrons themselves should be easily detectable - and dangerous). [snip] Blue: >"What I would suggest is that we need to move beyond the mere existence of a nuclear-lattice coupling to a discussion of the quantitative aspects of such couplings. If one assigns an energy scale to the various known couplings there is a pattern that is worth noting. The energies involved in nuclear-lattice couplings are not very big. They don't have very large effects on the nuclear states involved. Now is such experimental data something we can simply ignore? I claim that all the experimental data that addresses this question has to be considered and given weight appropriately along with the CF calorimetry data. To my mind it defies logic to assert that this body of experimental data should be ignored in this discussion. The evidence clearly indicates that nuclear-lattice couplings are, at most, small perturbations on nuclear states. Is there anyone who would challenge that statement as a good summary for the vast >body of data available?" END of quote Just because no one previously noticed high energy examples, doesn't necessarily mean that they are not possible. Furthermore, once the low energy phenomenon has been recognised, many people tend to explore it, resulting in a "vast body of data". CF may just be an example of high energy coupling. > >I think anyone can easily see that two points have been made in this and other related posts (and never countered effectively). The points are that outside of cold fusion, that nuclear lattice-coupling is a low energy. low probability phenomenon - far from a "bulk" or common event. For it to be the prime reason that gammas are not found would imply that it happens *most of the time* in CF, but nowhere else in all of physics - as even in the best of circumstances it is a rare event. Moreover, the 24 MeV photon is so incredibly potent and detectable (and deadly) that it would stick out like a sore thumb in situations where many joules of excess heat were released unless the coupling were nearly absolute. > >Bottom line - by invoking lattice coupling, the apologist is piggybacking one even more debilitating controversy on top of another. > >Why penalize your good experimental results with such a lame theory? > >Jones The gist of your argument appears to be that even if such coupling were possible, then there should still be some reactions producing detectable gamma rays (correct me if this is not what you were trying to say). However this argument assumes that the fusion reactions can occur without the lattice coupling. That may not be the case. IOW no coupling -> no reaction, and hence no gamma rays. The coupling itself may be the very agent of the reaction (as well as the energy removal mechanism). You can see this as follows. When a tight couple with the lattice is established, it very favourably alters the chances of a reaction taking place. IMO this is most likely because a tight lattice coupling results in zero or very low *relative* velocity between the deuterium nuclei, which in turn vastly increases their relative De Broglie wavelengths, such that these overlap, making tunnelling possible. Then the same tight couple which brought about the reaction also distributes the energy of the reaction to the lattice, in the form of a slight shift in the relative positions of many (millions?) of lattice atoms. This shift is like stressing a spring, which upon its release redistributes its stress energy in the form of heat in the lattice. This may appear self serving, however it seems to me that it is the very overlap of the De broglie waves which is the essence of the tight coupling in the first place. It is the "matter waves" which provide the link between the atoms, hence the mechanism which makes the fusion reaction possible is precisely the same mechanism which is responsible for distributing the energy. It is not really two separate processes, but all part of a single process. Note that we are talking about a hydrogen (isotope) lattice here, which explains why high loading is necessary. I.e. at low loading, there are two many discontinuities in the lattice to provide the necessary long chains required for a tight coupling (which I envisage to take place in single rows of atoms). If this scenario is correct, then high amplitude monotonic sound waves in the lattice should facilitate CF, due to forced resonance. Particularly when long wave sound (i.e. low frequency) is used. There is some evidence for this from the Italian nickel-hydrogen experiments where they stated that a "sharp blow" was required or helped, as well perhaps from Russ George's ultrasound results. Given that loading is greater near the surface, it would seem prudent to introduce these waves parallel to the surface, thus increasing the length of chains available. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk If "other people" can be denied their rights, then what's to stop someone claiming that you belong among the "other people"? From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 28 15:21:05 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2SNKuth030687; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 15:20:57 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2SNKtDY030671; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 15:20:55 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 15:20:55 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f From: Robin van Spaandonk To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Fw: The myth of lattice coupling and He ratios Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 09:20:50 +1000 Organization: Improving Message-ID: References: <001301c414e8$59c57ee0$8837fea9 cpq> <40672374.C1DA1FC7@ix.netcom.com> In-Reply-To: <40672374.C1DA1FC7 ix.netcom.com> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ultra5.eskimo.com id i2SNKqth030638 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53786 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: In reply to Edmund Storms's message of Sun, 28 Mar 2004 11:11:48 -0800: Hi, [snip] >I do not know what you mean here. Tritium has no decay gamma. It is a pure beta emitter. Oops, I missed that one! :) (re. my other post). Regards, Robin van Spaandonk If "other people" can be denied their rights, then what's to stop someone claiming that you belong among the "other people"? From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 28 15:31:02 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2SNUsth032468; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 15:30:55 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2SNUr6j032447; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 15:30:53 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 15:30:53 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f From: Robin van Spaandonk To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: LENT-CANR - too little too late? Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 09:30:48 +1000 Organization: Improving Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ultra5.eskimo.com id i2SNUnth032402 Resent-Message-ID: <9qzdZB.A.76H.sA2ZAB ultra5.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53787 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Sun, 28 Mar 2004 10:46:35 -0900: Hi, [snip] >More news on global warming: > > > >The effects of this CO2 increase are nominal compared to the feedback >effects what will happen if the arctic and the oceans warm up enough for a >significant release (from clatherates) of their methane, which is a vastly >more powerful greenhouse gas. In fact, a methane release ulitmately >results in CO2 formation, so an unexplained rise in CO2 may be in itself be >an indication of a significant methane release. Atmospheric methane >monitoring may be even more important than CO2 monitoring. > >It is a sad fact that the best available immediate protector of the >environment is OPEC. A high price for energy is the only thing that can >presently make for the changes in infrastructure that are necessary. It is >too bad the general public is either ignorant or as stupid and stubborn as >a mule that must get a board across the head to move. > >Regards, > >Horace Heffner > While I agree with all of this, I would also point out that warmer sea water will dissolve less CO2, ensuring that what we produce stays in the atmosphere. (If memory serves correctly). Regards, Robin van Spaandonk If "other people" can be denied their rights, then what's to stop someone claiming that you belong among the "other people"? From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 28 16:02:20 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2T02GRS021798; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 16:02:16 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2T02Dph021782; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 16:02:13 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 16:02:13 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <40676823.2060509 rtpatlanta.com> Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 19:04:51 -0500 From: Terry Blanton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Mars Methand (3rd try) References: <002901c414e1$5a9492e0$0c81b341 computer> <40671F29.2070200@rtpatlanta.com> <005c01c41502$bdb09240$0c81b341@computer> In-Reply-To: <005c01c41502$bdb09240$0c81b341 computer> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53788 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Frederick Sparber wrote: >Also a possibility of Water-Carbon Dioxide reactions with molten sulfur that can >release hydrogen that can react with the carbonyl sulfide (COS) to produce methane. > You goin' MIB on us, Sparber? Ackshully, there is evidence of outgassing in the Mars Express photos. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 28 16:18:08 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2T0I1th007379; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 16:18:01 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2T0I0Vj007369; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 16:18:00 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 16:18:00 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 15:24:10 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: Puzzled Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53789 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 12:49 AM 3/29/4, wrote: >Answer IS "Black Forest - Brian's Choice", which took in place of the soil >pictures >chosen by NASA, found on Mars rovers front page! > >On the medium or the large version of this image, it can seen varieties of >things >including these earth worm features at the lower right. These are not simply >cracks >in sand or illusions, the look like but better to something alive, able to >advance on and under >the soil, pushing it, like worm or plant root. The unique perspective of this >shot give > very good sight. > >I guess the "Brian's Choice" is indeed a very good choice. :) > >I also noticed the large picture of these shots have better resolution than raw >images. ??? I assume you are talking about the big group of 6 soil types photo in the press release section for Spirit. Yes, the photos seem to be enhanced quite a bit. Also, they represent a smaller area than the usual microscopic images. They are blow-ups. Maybe I have limited vision in this case. Vision limited by my bias to see the stuff as lichen. However, I just see the stuff in that "Brian's Choice" photo as similar to the stuff covering the ice field outside Eagle crater, and visible in most soil photos. I think it is just lichen. You can see the stalks and in some cases the heads. This is the stuff I have called matchstick lichen. It grows thick, like a very thick shag rug. The close proximity of the strands traps water vapor escaping from the frozen soil below. It is the crustal lichen that forms the crust that preserves the ice below from sublimation. You'll notice that the soil is higly disrupted in "Brian's Choice" from the pressure of a spectrometer. I think that is why in some cases the individual strands of lichen are so visible. If you keep in mind that they are typically frozen, then it becoms clear that when disrupted they can fracture and look like worms when strewn about. There seem to be various forms of lichen. Some are the crustal form that produce irregular shaped apothecia (fruiting bodies) produced below the surface, and some produce the "berry on a stalk" perithecia (fruiting bodies.) The fruiting bodies appear to be in various stages of growth and decay in the various photos, depending on location. It wouldn't suprise me to find out that many of them blew into the crater from long distances away. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 28 16:22:25 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2T0M2RS025517; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 16:22:03 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2T0M0fA025482; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 16:22:00 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 16:22:00 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <40676D02.58F05F20 ix.netcom.com> Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 16:25:38 -0800 From: Edmund Storms Organization: Energy K System X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77C-CCK-MCD {C-UDP; EBM-APPLE} (Macintosh; U; PPC) X-Accept-Language: en,pdf MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: The myth of lattice coupling References: <001301c414e8$59c57ee0$8837fea9 cpq> <40672374.C1DA1FC7@ix.netcom.com> <000b01c41506$08c17620$8837fea9@cpq> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53790 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Jones Beene wrote: > Hi Ed, > > I see that you are still not understanding, or at least resisting, the main point that I have been trying to make. This is probably my fault for not being specific enough. Let me try it again, line-by-line. > > > Well Jones, I'm glad you made this very clear. Nevertheless, certain facts do not go away. Energy is detected, He is detected, and gamma is not detected. > > So far, so good... > > ES: "Therefore, you conclude that the energy and He do not result from fusion." > > This is not true. I accept that lots of excess energy is detected. But if it comes from fusion, then it clearly it does not come from the kind of fusion that is known and accepted in physics. Therefore, it may be acceptable to the open-minded observer to conclude that the excess energy could be coming from a new (since 1989) and previously unknown type of fusion. But it is not acceptable in either logic, science or anecdote to conclude that "traditional fusion is responsible but that somehow the gammas are hidden by lattice interaction." Nuclear lattice-coupling, at least of the high probability variety, is a myth. It does not exist. OK Jones, if we agree that the energy and helium are real, I have no problem with your rejection of the idea that a fusion reaction is unable to couple its large energy release to the lattice. Many people have had a hard time with this process and, as a result, have suggested other mechanisms. Yours is just one more that can be added to the list. At this point, I take no stand as to which one is correct. All I know for sure is that energy results from helium production and this energy is observed mainly as heat and not as high energy radiation. > > > I hope that is crystal clear. Yes, it could be a fusion-like reaction, to the degree that helium is found without outside contamination, but NO it cannot be fusion that is quenched by lattice-coupling. Lattice coupling on a scale that would hide all the 24 MeV gammas is an absolute myth. The logical proof of that statement has been presented. I don't know how to express it more succinctly than that. I have no problem with this statement. However, the question is still open in many people's minds as to whether a process that looks like coupling might be discovered. > > > ES: "It is pure coincidence that the ratio of energy to amount of He is close to what would be expected from fusion. After reading what you say below, you apparently simply reject the helium. I wonder why you don't also reject the energy as well." > > I do not reject the energy. It might be coincidental or not. There is conflicting information on that. Some studies show a good correlation. In others there is excess energy but NO helium except that which decays from tritium. Are you saying Claytor's work is not cold fusion? Claytor is not measuring energy and sees so little tritium that energy measurement would be impossible. He and other people (including myself) have made tritium under conditions that would not be expected to produce tritium if "normal" fusion were operating. Therefore, the results fall under the banner of CF. > > > > > If you have no gammas and want to invoke phonon or lattice coupling, then first set up an experiment where you can show that nuclear lattice coupling is high probability and happens most of the time in similar situations. > > > ES: "As far as I know there are no similar situations except perhaps for the Mφssbauer effect." > > The Mossbauer effect is absent at the temperatures of cold fusion. Simple as that. Even at cryogenic temperature, it may happen at low probability - approx one in every 10^6 interactions. If a Mossbauer-like effect were going on in cold fusion, it would screen only a few 24 MeV gammas. Most would still be detected!! Point taken. I agree, 24 MeV is a lot of energy to couple to a lattice. > > > > > Unfortunately, the relevant and obvious experiment has been performed and it is null. When one loads tritium into a Pd lattice, the decay gammas are still measurable and correlate well with what theory says they should be - how could this be true if Pd somehow promotes nuclear lattice coupling? Conclusion: nuclear lattice coupling is a myth. > > > ES: "I do not know what you mean here. Tritium has no decay gamma. It is a pure beta emitter. If you want some evidence that the decay energy of tritium might be affected by the lattice in which it resides, check out the early work of Reifenschweiler, not the current paper in IE." > > Ed, you are being difficult. Tritium is a beta emitter, of course, but secondary gammas and Auger cascades are copious and easily detectable. Check Claytor's results in any old Fusion Technology article. He looks at palladium cathodes and he sees copious emissions from the tritium secondaries. Simple as that. Yes, the gamma emission is secondary and at least a thousand times lower power than D+D but... IF the palladium was able to couple to the hydrogen nucleus in any way, you would see far fewer gammas from the tritium in CF cathodes. Here we need to define our terms. A gamma ray only comes from the nucleus. Tritium does not produce a gamma and it does not cause surrounding nuclei to emit a gamma. However, Auger cascades result in X-rays which are detected. However, these energies are very weak. Claytor detects the beta emission as an ion current. In the past he detected neutrons along with the tritium. I know of no time he detected gamma emission. Occasionally people (Wolf) have created radioactive elements that are radioactive and decay by gamma emitters, but this is very rare. > > > > > Isn't the problem obvious? We know that radioactive hydrogen (tritium) is not lattice-coupled in a Pd matrix and cannot be induced to couple, so how can the thousand-fold higher radiation levels of deuterium fusion be said to ever couple, and especially to couple so well that ZERO 24 MeV gammas can be measured? > > I notice you didn't respond to this point. If even a few percent of the 24 MeV gammas were detectable, then the situation would be different. I didn't respond because I don't know what you are talking about, as I explained above. Even when tritium is made by normal fusion, a gamma ray is not emitted. The resulting energy is carried by the tritium and a proton. Even when X-rays are only emitted they occur only when these energetic ions contact matter. > > > Sure, the element helium can conceivably be derived from an extremely unlikely form of fusion, but it is infinitely more likely to be found from a plethora of other innocuous sources. The appearance of helium is ALWAY ambiguous evidence for fusion, no matter how well it correlates to excess energy UNLESS the statistical correlation can be framed to be arguably absolute. In point of fact, the correlation is shaky even in those few excess-heat experiments where helium is found in rough proportion to excess energy, but most damning is that in much, probably most of the highest quality CF work done in the 1990s, the major ash component was tritium, such as found in careful experiments done by Claytor and others with almost no helium except that which decayed from tritium. Tritium, of course, releases gamma radiation. > > > ES: "Here you reveal a value judgment that I don't share. I believe that the growing body of He-4 measurements show a consistent relationship to heat production. The He-3 and tritium measurements show no relationship to measured energy production." > > Ed, I agree that there is some correlation but that is beside the point. Either lattice coupling can shield MOST of the 24 MeV gammas or not. The conclusion of almost everyone in physics including those that accpet CFis that nuclear lattice-coupling a myth, and is a non-starter. Again, why penalize good experimental results with a lame and indefensible theory? Well Jones, in many people's minds, the experimental results have been penalized by many indefensible theories, not just this one. If you want to fight the theory wars, you can find many people who will shoot down any idea you propose. That is why I avoid theory debates and stick to the observed facts. > > > Face the emerging fact, we are back at square one as to the underlying theory - which means that the experimenter may, or may not, be detecting *fusion* - but if you are detecting fusion, it is a previously unknown type of fusion that is different from any fusion reaction that was known before 1989. But it is not acceptable in either logic, science or anecdote to conclude that "traditional fusion is responsible but that somehow the gammas are hidden by lattice interaction." You summarized very well the reasons why people have a hard time believing the observations. > > > > "People who measure helium also measure it in their laboratory air. McKubre finds the concentration to be about 5.8 ppm." > > > > That is way lower than the generally accepted figure but even so, you will exhale approximately 20,000,000,000,000,000 helium atoms with every breath instead of the earlier figure... I don't know where you get your numbers, but 6 ppm is the accepted figure I have seen. > and if this was found to be in any small correlation to the energy your body was burning during that breath, does that then mean that your metabolism was utilizing D+D fusion? I think not. > > Again, it all gets back to the initial query: why would you penalize good experimental results with this ridiculous lattice-coupling theory? Because not everyone thinks it is as ridiculous as you do. In addition, this is the simplest way to describe the end result without having to explain the process. It rather like saying that a burning match makes light and heat without having to explain the chemistry. You are saying that the match can not make light and heat unless I can explain exactly how the process works. If I propose that the light and heat is caused by God's anger, you would tell me therefore the light and heat can not possibly be real, and I should avoid such an explanation if I want anyone to believe the heat and light are real. The fact that I can burn myself is not the issue. This may be too simple, but you get the point. Ed > > > Regards, > > Jones From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 28 17:07:09 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2T175RS002995; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 17:07:06 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2T174av002935; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 17:07:04 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 17:07:04 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <001901c41529$f77ca500$8837fea9 cpq> From: "Jones Beene" To: "vortex" References: <001301c414e8$59c57ee0$8837fea9 cpq> Subject: Re: The myth of lattice coupling Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 17:05:45 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ultra6.eskimo.com id i2T171RS002913 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53791 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Hi Robin, First let me thank Ed for his many insightful comments and willingness to keep an open mind. I think we have nearly beat this one to death. > RvS: Yesterday I posted a theoretical mechanism which would result in energetic alphas (and perhaps energetic electrons) rather than gamma rays. Energetic alphas will always produce some energetic gammas as secondaries that should be not only be easily measured, but identified through spectroscopy. If you disagree, can you cite any evidence where this is not the case. > Just because no one previously noticed high energy examples [of lattice-coupling], doesn't necessarily mean that they are not possible. They may be possible ! That is really beside the point. The point is that high probability nuclear-lattice coupling has no actual model in all of physics now, and presently no actual evidence for it (note I said "high probability"). It is not just unproven, but hypothetical - and one should probably not employ a hypothetical explanation to justify a controversial phenomenon... at least if widespread acceptance of your work is important to you. If experimental reproducibility of the controversial phenomenon is adequate, leave it at that. Or.... Prove the hypothetical methodology first, and then use that to help to improve on your experimentary evidence for the controversial phenomenon. It really gets down to "layering" of probability. The skeptic or unconvinced observer of CF might not balk at what he considers to be the probability of the experimenter not making measurement error, so long as the experimenter doesn't layer that on top of that an explanation that is even more improbable... BTW, one objection to my previous post that you might have raised is the suggestion that instead of accepting a fictional coupling mechanism, isn't the suggestion for a new type of nuclear reaction? Well, in point of fact, new types of nuclear reactions are discovered or proposed all the time. Since P&F you can probably find dozens of papers on new and weird double and triple beta decays, etc. Of course, your suggestion below takes a back-door run at that And once again, the problem with the Mossbauer analogy is not just that it is low energy, but that it is also low probability at low energy and at low temperature. Three strikes and your out... as far as being able to hide that 24 MeV gamma. > The gist of your argument appears to be that even if such coupling were possible, then there should still be some reactions producing detectable gamma rays (correct me if this is not what you were trying to say). BINGO... I think you've got it... > However this argument assumes that the fusion reactions can occur without the lattice coupling. Happens all the time... > That may not be the case. IOW no coupling -> no reaction, and hence no gamma rays. But D+D fusion reactions ONLY happen without coupling in reality, and have never been shown to happen with coupling. You're trying to use two negative hypotheticals to prove one positive reality... > The coupling itself may be the very agent of the reaction (as well as the energy removal mechanism). Then show that coupling can even happen at all, even at low probability in another experiment. For instance, alloy a gamma emitter into a Pd lattice and show that its emissions are coupled rather than scattered. From there on, it is far easier to proceed to the possibility that this could be the sine qua non of both the reaction and the conversion mechanism. > the mechanism which makes the fusion reaction possible is precisely the same mechanism which is responsible for distributing the energy. It is not really two separate processes, but all part of a single process. Hey, I'd like to believe it. But there are so many simpler hypothetical possibilities, far more likely, to explain helium and these are explanations that don't involve the extraordinarily low probability of D+D> He, which is rare even in the core of the sun. It just hardly ever happens anywhere so why would it happen here if there are simpler ways? Far more probable, for instance, is that helium results sequentially from a neutron being stripped off a deuterium in the lattice, which neutron is absorbed in the matrix and following that, the helium that is being measured against the excess energy comes from the decay of the Pd atom that absorbed the neutron. This methodology seems to fail from Ed's ratio by a multiple of about a factor of 24, since these types of decays are usually about 1 MeV, but there are a number of ways that this method could involve concurrent effects that brought the ratio more inline with the energy seen. No it couldn't be called cold 'fusion' but I don't think anyone on this forum would balk at the more generic LENR moniker. Jones From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 28 17:14:41 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2T1EXth018325; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 17:14:33 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2T1EVXK018311; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 17:14:31 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 17:14:31 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 16:20:43 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: hidden Mazatzal pieces Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53792 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 4:10 PM 3/28/4, SnowDog wrote: >http://www.golddirectory.com/mars/mars9.htm Nice job. > >I think the spot is probably black. It can't be black. It is white in 2 out of 6 filters. It sure looks blue to me, some parts more blue than others. The blue coming from copper sulfate still makes sense to me. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 28 17:14:39 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2T1EWRS004393; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 17:14:32 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2T1EVM9004380; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 17:14:31 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 17:14:31 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 16:20:49 -0900 To: "vortex-l eskimo.com" From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: Land of the brave and free??!! Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53793 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 2:47 PM 3/28/4, Akira Kawasaki wrote: >March 29, 2004 > >Vortex, > >Drudge Report has posted a New Orleans- based 5th Circuit Court of Appeals >(federal) decision. Immediately, police officers in Louisiana no longer >need a search or arrest warrant to conduct a brief searech of your home or >business. >Sign of the times for the rest of the country and citizenry? > >-ak- Isn't Louisiana the place that made news in the last few years for busting tourists passing through in (rental) cars or having out of state licenses so they could make money on the legal proceedings or bail? I seem to remember some kind of drug planting being in the report also. Kind of like the speed traps that plagued the south in small towns back in the 50's, only for much bigger bucks. The only way many small towns could get enough revenue back in the 50's was through speed traps. They would have a stooge car pass tourists right at the radar trap, so as to jack the speed radar indicator way up. They were always hunting tourists on their way to Florida, because they had some money to spare, as opposed to those coming back who were usually broke. You could either pay a huge fine and go free or lose your vacation waiting for a court date in jail. The super highways put an end to a lot of that. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 28 17:14:40 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2T1EZRS004437; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 17:14:35 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2T1EXkV004415; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 17:14:33 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 17:14:33 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 16:20:46 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: LENT-CANR - too little too late? Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53794 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 9:30 AM 3/29/4, Robin van Spaandonk wrote: >While I agree with all of this, I would also point out that warmer sea >water will dissolve less CO2, ensuring that what we produce stays in the >atmosphere. (If memory serves correctly). That sure sounds right, both for dissolved gas and for carbonates. AFAIK, carbonates precipitate out of the water and gasesous CO2 bubbles out as the water warms. BTW, sorry for typing "LENT" in stead of "LENR" in the title. You'd think after so many years of posting I'd get a spell checker. 8^( Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 28 17:32:54 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2T1Wmth022059; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 17:32:48 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2T1WkhW022047; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 17:32:46 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 17:32:46 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <013401c4152d$bdc14c90$f8ffa8c0 Craig> From: "SnowDog" To: References: Subject: Re: hidden Mazatzal pieces Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 19:32:46 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Resent-Message-ID: <7w6H7D.A.bYF.-y3ZAB ultra5.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53795 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: > >I think the spot is probably black. > > > It can't be black. It is white in 2 out of 6 filters. It sure looks blue > to me, some parts more blue than others. The blue coming from copper > sulfate still makes sense to me. If there is no blue at all in an image, the blue filtered images would still be adjusted so that there is at least one spot with maximum brightness. Each filtered image is adjusted accordingly. Craig From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 28 17:56:17 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2T1uCRS011816; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 17:56:12 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2T1uBqr011806; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 17:56:11 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 17:56:11 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <406782D9.9060905 rtpatlanta.com> Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 20:58:49 -0500 From: Terry Blanton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: LENT-CANR - too little too late? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <2BVtq.A.a4C.7I4ZAB ultra6.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53796 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Horace Heffner wrote: >BTW, sorry for typing "LENT" in stead of "LENR" in the title. You'd think >after so many years of posting I'd get a spell checker. 8^( > Unfortunately, 'Lent' will be in the dictionary and 'LENR' will not . . . yet. :-) From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 28 18:18:27 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2T2IGth031527; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 18:18:16 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2T2IFwm031512; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 18:18:15 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 18:18:15 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f From: "explorecraft" To: Subject: RE: Asteroid flyby tonight Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 09:16:41 +0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - lester.switchfusion.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - eskimo.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - explorecraft.com Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53797 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: > -----Original Message----- > From: Horace Heffner [mailto:hheffner mtaonline.net] > Sent: Monday, 2004 March 29 03:35 > To: vortex-l eskimo.com > Subject: Re: Asteroid flyby tonight > > > At 4:48 PM 3/28/4, Robin van Spaandonk wrote: > >In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Tue, 23 Mar 2004 15:07:18 -0900: > >Hi, > > > >>At 7:55 PM 3/22/4, thomas malloy wrote: > >>>How does the angle of incidence affect the amount of energy that the > >>>asteroid would release? > >> > >> >...X...< > >[snip] > >Perhaps Thomas was referring to the angle with relation to the Earth's > >orbit around the Sun? If it approached in the plane of the ecliptic, in a > >retrograde orbit, then you can add the velocity of the Earth (~30 km/sec) > >to that of the meteor, which makes for a much bigger splash. > > > Thomas would have to answer the question in regard to his > intended meaning. > However, the term "angle of incidence" that I used prior to his question I > think clearly meant angle of incidence with respect to the > earth's surface, > which is completely independent of the mutual angle of the intersecting > orbits. > > Yes, a retrograde orbit would provide somewhat larger maximum possible > energy than a 90 degree mutual angle, but such an event is very unlikely > unless the source of the impacting body is a Nemesis cloud. Retrograde > orbit objects with orbits in the ecliptic are fairly rare. All that said, (Noting 2004 FY 15 hurtling past as we type) the number we know about is not yet enough to give a good accounting. The statistics at: http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/stats/ indicate we have only just begun the learning curve. Reconciling the number there with theory as proposed by Theodore Modis in Predictions (1992, sequel in 2002), we don't even have a clue yet. Cheers. http://www.explorecraft.com/forum From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 28 19:34:43 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2T3YbRS001251; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 19:34:38 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2T3YWjE001225; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 19:34:32 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 19:34:32 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <001601c41340$1a240760$8545ccd1 MIKEBY3NR533HT> References: <001601c41340$1a240760$8545ccd1 MIKEBY3NR533HT> Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 21:35:45 -0600 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: thomas malloy Subject: Re: Thoughts on C F and Parksie Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-DCC-CPI-Metrics: Clear 1161; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53798 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: >Thomas Malloy wrote: > and Frank Carrell replied > > >> IMHO, if someone had succeeded in producing an engine which produced >> usable power, this matter would have been settled. OTHO, radio >> nuclides have been remediated, and DOE has ignored it. > >How do you mean 'ignored'? The process that I know of falls within the >window of conventional physics, so nothing to get excited about, but also >involves high cost, high energy equipment so that while remediation can be Are you referring to the Nucsol technology? The remediation technologies that are posted on the LENR-CANR website don't look particularly high tech or expensive. >There is no >> question that the anomalous isotopic ratios are artifactual, >> indicating either separation or transmutation. What was it that >> Parksie said, "I don't care about your isotopic ratios"? > >Yes, they are artifactual, but like other hints will not be taken seriously >until the whole issue of an existence proof is accepted. Which is pretty difficult when you have a group of academics like Parksie who refuse to even look at the research papers. > My understanding of >the approach taken by those presenting to the new panel will be the minimal >one of getting an official endorsement that the world of LENR constitutes >"science" and thereby merits routine consideration instead of routine >rejection. Well we can't have that >Thereafter "scientists" can apply for grants, get papers accepted >by mainline journals, etc. without threatening their careers. Young >scientists could then afford to study the field without wrecking their >careers. The Patent Office might even stop automatically rejecting CF patent >applications. If that happens, then we might see CF engines emerge from the >shadows. It would seem to me that if a significant amount of energy could be liberated there would be research papers talking about it. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 28 20:45:33 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2T4jTRS018270; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 20:45:29 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2T4jRt8018247; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 20:45:27 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 20:45:27 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f From: Robin van Spaandonk To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: The myth of lattice coupling Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 14:45:29 +1000 Organization: Improving Message-ID: References: <001301c414e8$59c57ee0$8837fea9 cpq> <001901c41529$f77ca500$8837fea9@cpq> In-Reply-To: <001901c41529$f77ca500$8837fea9 cpq> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ultra6.eskimo.com id i2T4jNRS018196 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53799 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: In reply to Jones Beene's message of Sun, 28 Mar 2004 17:05:45 -0800: Hi, [snip] >> RvS: Yesterday I posted a theoretical mechanism which would result in energetic alphas (and perhaps energetic electrons) rather than gamma rays. > >Energetic alphas will always produce some energetic gammas as secondaries that should be not only be easily measured, but identified through spectroscopy. If you disagree, can you cite any evidence where this is not the case. Actually the number of secondary *gammas* (i.e. due to stimulation of other nuclei) will be but a tiny fraction of the number of alphas produced, because most of the energy of the alphas goes into stripping electrons off lattice atoms. When these electrons recombine with the resultant ions some x-rays, but mostly lower energy EM is produced (from whence the glow in the dark effect from radioisotopes). So *some* yes, but only a very small amount, and none of these will be 24 MeV. So in my statement above I should have said "primarily" energetic alphas. > >> Just because no one previously noticed high energy examples [of lattice-coupling], doesn't necessarily mean that they are not possible. > >They may be possible ! That is really beside the point. The point is that high probability nuclear-lattice coupling has no actual model in all of physics now, and presently no actual evidence for it (note I said "high probability"). It is not just unproven, but hypothetical - and one should probably not employ a hypothetical explanation to justify a controversial phenomenon... at least if widespread acceptance of your work is important to you. Since no existing theory can explain the results, it becomes necessary to come up with new theories that can. This too is part of the scientific process. The next step is to make predictions based upon those new theories, and test them with real experiments. In my previous post, I made certain suggestions which could be embodied in new experiments, and tested. Sociologically speaking however you may be correct, if you want quick acceptance, you are far more likely to get it, if you can explain your results with existing theory. Nevertheless, it appears necessary in this case to actually introduce new theories. This isn't done just for sake of it, but rather because the situation demands it. > >If experimental reproducibility of the controversial phenomenon is adequate, leave it at that. Or.... Prove the hypothetical methodology first, and then use that to help to improve on your experimentary evidence for the controversial phenomenon. > >It really gets down to "layering" of probability. The skeptic or unconvinced observer of CF might not balk at what he considers to be the probability of the experimenter not making measurement error, so long as the experimenter doesn't layer that on top of that an explanation that is even more improbable... Whether or not an explanation is considered improbable is frequently a measure of the readers understanding, and varies considerably from person to person. > >BTW, one objection to my previous post that you might have raised is the suggestion that instead of accepting a fictional coupling mechanism, isn't the suggestion for a new type of nuclear reaction? Well, in point of fact, new types of nuclear reactions are discovered or proposed all the time. Since P&F you can probably find dozens of papers on new and weird double and triple beta decays, etc. Of course, your suggestion below takes a back-door run at that Indeed, though the result would be pure helium, no gammas, heat in the lattice, and no glow in the dark. In short an excellent fit to the observations. > >And once again, the problem with the Mossbauer analogy is not just that it is low energy, but that it is also low probability at low energy and at low temperature. Three strikes and your out... as far as being able to hide that 24 MeV gamma. While the effect does increase with a drop in temperature (a strong indication BTW that it depends upon De Broglie wave coupling), it is certainly still present to some extent at room temperature. As to low probability, that just makes it more likely that this is possibly the explanation of the CF phenomenon, as that too would appear to be low probability. As for the low energy aspect, I believe I have already dealt with that in my previous post. > >> The gist of your argument appears to be that even if such coupling were possible, then there should still be some reactions producing detectable gamma rays (correct me if this is not what you were trying to say). > >BINGO... I think you've got it... > >> However this argument assumes that the fusion reactions can occur without the lattice coupling. > >Happens all the time... Yes, but only in hot plasmas, and even then the little mongrels fight against it tooth and nail. ;) > >> That may not be the case. IOW no coupling -> no reaction, and hence no gamma rays. Obviously, at low temperatures in a lattice. > >But D+D fusion reactions ONLY happen without coupling in reality, and have never been shown to happen with coupling. You're trying to use two negative hypotheticals to prove one positive reality... In hot fusion they have no choice. In a sense, we provide them with the worst possible circumstances, then bend over backwards to force the issue anyway. Our problem is that up until now, hot fusion is the only sort we have noticed in nature, and hence the only sort we have tried to emulate. That doesn't however mean that it is the best or easiest way to achieve the goal. > >> The coupling itself may be the very agent of the reaction (as well as the energy removal mechanism). > >Then show that coupling can even happen at all, even at low probability in another experiment. For instance, alloy a gamma emitter into a Pd lattice and show that its emissions are coupled rather than scattered. From there on, it is far easier to proceed to the possibility that this could be the sine qua non of both the reaction and the conversion mechanism. This is precisely what happens with Mφssbauer spectroscopy all the time. It is well known that the specific lattice type is actually of little relevance, and in fact this technology is frequently used as a means of determining the precise nature of the chemical environment, if I'm not mistaken. I am however surprised that you haven't come up yet with Richard Blue's argument that there is a speed of light limitation on the energy of the reaction which this type of coupling will support. (Which I must admit I haven't yet been able to even find, let alone fathom. Perhaps Ed Storms can help out on this one?) > >> the mechanism which makes the fusion reaction possible is precisely the same mechanism which is responsible for distributing the energy. It is not really two separate processes, but all part of a single process. > >Hey, I'd like to believe it. But there are so many simpler hypothetical possibilities, far more likely, to explain helium and these are explanations that don't involve the extraordinarily low probability of D+D> He, which is rare even in the core of the sun. But it precisely because it is in a hot fusion environment that is low probability! (Actually compared to the H + H -> D + e+ + nu reaction it is incredibly fast in the Sun). The difference between a plasma and a lattice is that in a lattice movement is restricted, and when it does happen, it is far more likely to happen in harmony with one neighbours than at odds with them (because this is easier to do, and hence a lower energy option). In a plasma, all motion is totally random. The implication is that in a plasma, relative velocities between particles are high, and De Broglie wave lengths correspondingly short, which means particles must get very close together before they can tunnel. In a lattice the converse situation arises much more frequently. > >It just hardly ever happens anywhere so why would it happen here if there are simpler ways? Far more probable, for instance, is that helium results sequentially from a neutron being stripped off a deuterium in the lattice, What makes you think it is easy to strip a neutron from deuterium? Since 2.2 MeV was released when they combined, it is going to have to be found again if you want to separate them....unless I can interest you in some low mass protons and neutrons? ;) [snip] Regards, Robin van Spaandonk If "other people" can be denied their rights, then what's to stop someone claiming that you belong among the "other people"? From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 28 21:03:16 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2T53ARS022848; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 21:03:10 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2T539iP022839; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 21:03:09 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 21:03:09 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f From: Robin van Spaandonk To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Asteroid flyby tonight Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 15:03:13 +1000 Organization: Improving Message-ID: <71bf60d0lrlko8cb0bqatp8bejdpdavbnc 4ax.com> References: In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ultra6.eskimo.com id i2T536RS022804 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53800 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: In reply to explorecraft's message of Mon, 29 Mar 2004 09:16:41 +0700: Hi, [snip] Horace: >> Yes, a retrograde orbit would provide somewhat larger maximum possible >> energy than a 90 degree mutual angle, but such an event is very unlikely >> unless the source of the impacting body is a Nemesis cloud. Retrograde >> orbit objects with orbits in the ecliptic are fairly rare. > explorecraft: >All that said, (Noting 2004 FY 15 hurtling past as we type) > the number we know about is not yet enough to give a good accounting. > >The statistics at: http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/stats/ > indicate we have only just begun the learning curve. > Reconciling the number there with theory as proposed > by Theodore Modis in Predictions (1992, sequel in 2002), > we don't even have a clue yet. [snip] The solar system oscillates up and own above the plane of the ecliptic of the galaxy. The greatest matter density in the galaxy occurs in the plane of the ecliptic, hence this plane is a likely incarnation of Horace's "Nemesis cloud". AFAIK we are due to pass through the centre of the plane of the ecliptic again on 21 Dec. 2012, so as we approach that date, one might well expect the frequency of close approaches to increase. Does anyone know the frequency of the oscillation? Regards, Robin van Spaandonk If "other people" can be denied their rights, then what's to stop someone claiming that you belong among the "other people"? From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 28 22:15:44 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2T6Fb1C018661; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 22:15:37 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2T6FYwl018648; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 22:15:34 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 22:15:34 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 21:21:47 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: Asteroid flyby tonight Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53801 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 3:03 PM 3/29/4, Robin van Spaandonk wrote: >The solar system oscillates up and own above the plane of the ecliptic of >the galaxy. The greatest matter density in the galaxy occurs in the plane >of the ecliptic, hence this plane is a likely incarnation of Horace's >"Nemesis cloud". The "Nemesis cloud" concept is definitely not mine. Not sure whose it is. However I added a few obvious notions to the concept that may be but probably are not original, like the fact the Nemesis star need not ever return for the process to continue on unabated in the natural period of Ort cloud, or more likely objects in a cloud well beyond the Ort cloud. >AFAIK we are due to pass through the centre of the plane of the ecliptic >again on 21 Dec. 2012, so as we approach that date, one might well expect >the frequency of close approaches to increase. > >Does anyone know the frequency of the oscillation? The above may be a misnomer. The ecliptic is the plane of the earth's orbit around the sun, which therefore also happens to be the apparent path of the sun around the earth against the background of the celestial sphere. It is called the ecliptic because it is the plane in which eclipses occur. The earth is always in the ecliptic. Our galaxy, the Milky Way, has a thin galactic disk, which defines the plane of the galactic disk to which I suspect you refer above. We are located in an arm of the Milky Way. The orbital time of our neighborhood is around 200 million years. (Now I'll go off the deep end above my head a bit.) Therefore, ignoring the gravitational effects of our neighborhood, we would expect to cross the plane of the galactic disk every 200 million years. There are likely other motions imposed by the motion of our arm and our immediate neighbors. However, like an underlying base sin wave, there should be an underlying major frequency of 1/(2^8 years). Other motions depend on our neighbors, but it seems to me they should be smaller in amplitude than the main underlying orbital motion, because our entire neighborhood is locked into the underlying orbital mechanics. This is in part because the vast amount of the mass of the galaxy is located at the center, in a manner similar to the solar system. It is a bit concerning that someone has fixed a specific date for a motion of this kind. This does not sound like it would be possible - to pin down such a date. The plane of the galaxy is not all that well defined. Rather, it sounds like someone has picked a specific orientation of the equinoxes, which are defined by the line where the plane of the ecliptic intersects the celestial equator. The imaginary points in space toward where the line disappears are the equinoxes. The sun is located on the equinox line at the time of the equinoxes. The celestial equator is a plane through the earth's equator, and thus it moves in concert with the earth's polar precession. The equinox points therefore move against the celestial sphere, and this was very important to the ancients. The orientation of the equinox defines the astrological age, for example. We are now in the age of Aquarius because the spring equinox is located in Aquarius. Astrological ages are like the big hand on a clock. They could be used to fortell distant events with some precision. However, the rate of the earth's precession is not fully known because the earth wobbles and the rate has an unpredictable character to it when examined in the short term. I seem to be rambling and I don't know if any of this helps. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 28 22:17:17 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2T6H91C019351; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 22:17:09 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2T6H7G1019330; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 22:17:07 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 22:17:07 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 21:23:23 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: hidden Mazatzal pieces Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53802 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 7:32 PM 3/28/4, SnowDog wrote: >If there is no blue at all in an image, the blue filtered images would still >be adjusted so that there is at least one spot with maximum brightness. Each >filtered image is adjusted accordingly. Adjusted by what? Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 28 22:19:12 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2T6J31C020146; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 22:19:04 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2T6J2Ru020123; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 22:19:02 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 22:19:02 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-Id: <2.2.32.20040329071634.006bc734 pop.freeserve.net> X-Sender: grimer2.freeserve.co.uk pop.freeserve.net X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 2.2 (32) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 07:16:34 +0000 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Grimer Subject: Re: Asteroid flyby tonight Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53803 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 03:03 pm 29-03-04 +1000, Robin van Spaandonk wrote: . >[snip] . >The solar system oscillates up and own above the >plane of the ecliptic of the galaxy. The greatest >matter density in the galaxy occurs in the plane >of the ecliptic, hence this plane is a likely >incarnation of Horace's "Nemesis cloud". AFAIK we >are due to pass through the centre of the plane >of the ecliptic again on 21 Dec. 2012, so as we >approach that date, one might well expect the >frequency of close approaches to increase. > >Does anyone know the frequency of the oscillation? I presume this article would give it - if anyone has access to the complete article. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-bib_query?1985Natur.317..338S Abstract A new study is presented of the observational evidence pertaining to the theory which attributes the episodic component of the earth's impact cratering record over the past 600 Myr to gravitational encounters between the solar system and interstellar clouds that cause comets to fall into the solar system and impact the earth. Contrary to a claim by Thaddeus and Chanan (1985), the vertical scale height of the clouds seems to be sufficently small and the sun's vertical trajectory sufficiently large for the modulating effect of the sun's galactovertical motion to be detectable in the terrestrial record of impact cratering with at least a 50 percent a priori probability. Interesting :-) Frank Grimer From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 28 22:58:52 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2T6wh1C029069; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 22:58:43 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2T6wgle029049; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 22:58:42 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 22:58:42 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 22:04:52 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: RE: Asteroid flyby tonight Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53804 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 9:16 AM 3/29/4, explorecraft wrote: >All that said, (Noting 2004 FY 15 hurtling past as we type) > the number we know about is not yet enough to give a good accounting. > >The statistics at: http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/stats/ > indicate we have only just begun the learning curve. > Reconciling the number there with theory as proposed > by Theodore Modis in Predictions (1992, sequel in 2002), > we don't even have a clue yet. How true! And did you see the size of the objects being cataloged? They are HUGE! And only those in timid near earth orbits are being cataloged. That's because they are the only comparatively small objects that CAN be cataloged. The Ort cloud stuff is not even visible. The only way to detect that stuff is by radar or lidar (laser). Since the bottom end of the large ones is about a km diamater, or about 500 m radius, they represent (.665 MT)[(500 m)/(15.24 m)]^3 = 23,500 megatons TNT. Each object in the bottom end of the "large" range represents, at very minimum, the rough equivalent of a global thermonuclear war. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Sun Mar 28 23:33:32 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2T7XPLe021679; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 23:33:25 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2T7XNPf021662; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 23:33:23 -0800 Resent-Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 23:33:23 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net (Unverified) Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 22:39:41 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: Asteroid flyby tonight Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53805 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 10:16 PM 3/28/4, Grimer wrote: >I presume this article would give it - >if anyone has access to the complete article. > >http://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-bib_query?1985Natur.317..338S > >Abstract >A new study is presented of the observational >evidence pertaining to the theory which attributes >the episodic component of the earth's impact >cratering record over the past 600 Myr to >gravitational encounters between the solar system >and interstellar clouds that cause comets to fall >into the solar system and impact the earth. >Contrary to a claim by Thaddeus and Chanan (1985), >the vertical scale height of the clouds seems to >be sufficently small and the sun's vertical >trajectory sufficiently large for the modulating >effect of the sun's galactovertical motion to be >detectable in the terrestrial record of impact >cratering with at least a 50 percent a priori >probability. Say, since the earth has a 200 My galactic obrital period, it should cross the galactic plane in opposite directions once every 50 years, once every 100 My in the same direction. The above premise works a priori with the commonly accepted major extinctions, on average, so I have to wonder if this is why they made the prediction. Kind of a self-fulfilling prophesy. The major extinctions occurred about 6 times in the last 600 million years, so this is right in average terms. Cambrian 570 -500 70 * Ordovician 500-430 70 * Silurian 430-395 35 Devonian 395-345 50 * Carboniferous 345-280 65 Permian 280-225 55 * Triassic 225-195 30 * Jurassic 195-136 56 Cretaceous 136-65 79 * Tertiary 65-present 65 * general agreement on extiction Tere are essentially 5 events in each of the last two 300 million year periods (600-300, 300-present). If we take only the periods in which it is generally agreed that major extinction events occurred we get the following pattern: Cambrian 570 70 * Ordovician 500 105 * Devonian 395 115 * Permian 280 55 * Triassic 225 86 * Cretaceous 136 144* In this perspective there are 3 events in each of the last 300 million year periods, or on average one event every 100 million years. The main problem with this theory is the lack of extinctions in the Pre-Cambian period. That fact leads me to believe a one time perterbation about 600 million years ago must have started the process. It may be possible we got gravitationally entangled with a partner Nemesis rock or cloud that orbits at the same galactic radius but always occupies approximately the opposing galactic latitude. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 29 01:18:21 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2T9IHdk018457; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 01:18:17 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2T9HtYg018362; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 01:17:55 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 01:17:55 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f From: Erikbaard aol.com Message-ID: <102.415c79a8.2d9943ba aol.com> Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 04:17:46 EST Subject: Re: Mars Methane To: vortex-l eskimo.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_102.415c79a8.2d9943ba_boundary" X-Mailer: 8.0 for Windows sub 6024 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53806 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: --part1_102.415c79a8.2d9943ba_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I used to be vaguely embarrassed when astronomers would point out that aliens might detect humanity first through original broadcasts of "I Love Lucy." But even that beats introducing oneself to the Cosmos through farts! Seriously, I'm surprised we didn't detect this earlier. Even the very optimistic David Grinspoon has argued that Mars is dead, citing its atmospheric equilibrium. Erik Baard --part1_102.415c79a8.2d9943ba_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I used to be vaguely embarrassed wh= en astronomers would point out that aliens might detect humanity first throu= gh original broadcasts of "I Love Lucy." But even that beats introducing one= self to the Cosmos through farts!

Seriously, I'm surprised we didn't detect this earlier. Even the very optimi= stic David Grinspoon has argued that Mars is dead, citing its atmospheric eq= uilibrium.

Erik Baard
--part1_102.415c79a8.2d9943ba_boundary-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 29 01:47:19 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2T9lAvt029851; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 01:47:10 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2T9l4Of029827; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 01:47:04 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 01:47:04 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <014001c41572$cd48eca0$f8ffa8c0 Craig> From: "SnowDog" To: References: Subject: Re: hidden Mazatzal pieces Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 03:47:08 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53807 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: > >If there is no blue at all in an image, the blue filtered images would still > >be adjusted so that there is at least one spot with maximum brightness. Each > >filtered image is adjusted accordingly. > > Adjusted by what? Before transmission to Earth, the PanCam adjusts each image so that the maximum value in the image is 255, and so that the minimum value in the image is 0. Apparently, this improves their compression performance. These images have to be adjusted back upon arrival to Earth by using calibration data supplied in the transmission, which is unique to each image. This image processing has several repercussions for us: 1) The images are put on the website without any adjustment. We do not see the original image. 2) The adjustment data is not released on the website with the image. It will be several months before the adjustment data is released. 3) Most images with the rover in the foreground will generally look good and not need any adjustment. All it takes is a small shiny bright spot in the image to prevent the PanCam from making any adjustment to the image. So if you make color pictures of the color wheel, most of them will come out looking good, balanced for white light. 4) Almost all pictures without the rover in the foreground WILL require some unknown adjustment. 5) Because there is less blue and green color in the environment than red, the blue and green filtered images are exagerated the most, in most pictures of the environment. The less blue there is in the environment, the more blue there will be in the image because of the Pancam's adjustment. The problem is illustrated the best in the first two images on this page, (if it loads). http://216.169.108.12/golddirectory/mars/mars4.htm The ONLY difference between the two pictures is that the second one contains a small section showing a shiny part of the rover. Because the second picture has a section which is already set to maximum, the PanCam can not adjust the second image, and hence, it looks like red Mars. The first image, however, has almost no red, and is full of blue hues precisely because there is no blue in the original image. All of these blue hues are artificial. It took me about 3 weeks to research this back in February. Craig Haynie (Houston) From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 29 01:53:18 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2T9rBdk024794; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 01:53:15 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2T9r7JT024761; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 01:53:07 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 01:53:07 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <016a01c41573$9f2faa60$f8ffa8c0 Craig> From: "SnowDog" To: References: <014001c41572$cd48eca0$f8ffa8c0@Craig> Subject: Re: hidden Mazatzal pieces Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 03:53:00 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53808 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: > Before transmission to Earth, the PanCam adjusts each image so that the > maximum value in the image is 255, and so that the minimum value in the > image is 0. Small correction. The original image is has 12-bit pixels. The value is not 255, but the maximum value possible for the image. Craig From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 29 05:29:13 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2TDT7vt007948; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 05:29:08 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2TDT2c8007919; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 05:29:02 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 05:29:02 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f From: FZNIDARSIC aol.com Message-ID: <79.25a14e27.2d997e94 aol.com> Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 08:28:52 EST Subject: Re: The myth of lattice coupling To: vortex-l eskimo.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_79.25a14e27.2d997e94_boundary" X-Mailer: 8.0 for Windows sub 6800 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53809 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: --part1_79.25a14e27.2d997e94_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 3/28/2004 11:46:05 PM Eastern Standard Time, rvanspaa bigpond.net.au writes: > Yesterday I posted a theoretical mechanism which would result in energetic > alphas (and perhaps energetic electrons) rather than gamma rays. > The process must conserve momentum and energy. The difference between the mass energy of the reactants and the products is the excess Q of the reaction. This extra energy must be dissipated. The dissipation process must conserve both momentum and energy. If two daughter nucleons are produced the kinetic energy is carried away by the daughter nucleons. The momentum is balanced by the angle in which the daughter nucleons shoot away. If a single daughter nucleon is produced like helium four, it is quite impossible for the reaction to conserve both momentum and energy. The result is the excess Q is carried away by an energetic photon. Frank Znidarsic --part1_79.25a14e27.2d997e94_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In a message dated 3/28/2004 11:46:= 05 PM Eastern Standard Time, rvanspaa bigpond.net.au writes:

Yesterday I posted a theoretica= l mechanism which would result in energetic alphas (and perhaps energetic el= ectrons) rather than gamma rays.


The process must conserve momentum and energy.  The difference between=20= the mass energy of the reactants and the products is the excess Q of the rea= ction.  This extra energy must be dissipated.  The dissipation pro= cess must conserve both momentum and energy.  If two daughter nucleons=20= are produced the kinetic energy is carried away by the daughter nucleons.&nb= sp; The momentum is balanced by the angle in which the daughter nucleons sho= ot away.  If a single daughter nucleon is produced like helium four, it= is quite impossible for the reaction to conserve both momentum and energy.&= nbsp; The result is the excess Q is carried away by an energetic photon.



Frank Znidarsic
--part1_79.25a14e27.2d997e94_boundary-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 29 05:32:27 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2TDWNdk004497; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 05:32:23 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2TDWIZC004336; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 05:32:18 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 05:32:18 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f From: FZNIDARSIC aol.com Message-ID: Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 08:32:06 EST Subject: Re: The myth of lattice coupling To: vortex-l eskimo.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_d1.8a0705f.2d997f56_boundary" X-Mailer: 8.0 for Windows sub 6800 Resent-Message-ID: <7h6O7C.A.sDB.iVCaAB ultra6.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53810 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: --part1_d1.8a0705f.2d997f56_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 3/28/2004 11:46:05 PM Eastern Standard Time, rvanspaa bigpond.net.au writes: > a strong indication BTW that it depends upon De Broglie wave coupling), I thought of this also. It does not fit with the facts. The debrogle wavelength is longer with colder system. The positive temperature coefficient of cold fusion does not bode well for the deBrogle path. Frank Z --part1_d1.8a0705f.2d997f56_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In a message dated 3/28/2004 11:46:= 05 PM Eastern Standard Time, rvanspaa bigpond.net.au writes:

a strong indication BTW that it= depends upon De Broglie wave coupling),


I thought of this also.  It does not fit with the facts.  The debr= ogle wavelength is longer with colder system.  The positive temperature= coefficient of cold fusion does not bode well for the deBrogle path.

Frank Z
--part1_d1.8a0705f.2d997f56_boundary-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 29 07:23:41 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2TFNadk028830; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 07:23:37 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2TFNYOU028814; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 07:23:34 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 07:23:34 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <004f01c415a1$9c3edd20$8837fea9 cpq> From: "Jones Beene" To: References: <79.25a14e27.2d997e94 aol.com> Subject: Re: The myth of lattice coupling Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 07:22:12 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ultra6.eskimo.com id i2TFNWdk028787 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53811 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Frank Z writes, > RvS: "Yesterday I posted a theoretical mechanism which would result in energetic alphas (and perhaps energetic electrons) rather than gamma rays." > FZ: "The process must conserve momentum and energy. The difference between the mass energy of the reactants and the products is the excess Q of the reaction. This extra energy must be dissipated. The dissipation process must conserve both momentum and energy. If two daughter nucleons are produced the kinetic energy is carried away by the daughter nucleons. The momentum is balanced by the angle in which the daughter nucleons shoot away. If a single daughter nucleon is produced like helium four, it is quite impossible for the reaction to conserve both momentum and energy. The result is the excess Q is carried away by an energetic photon." Excellent point, Frank, and this is precisely why the D+D > He reaction is so rare, not only on the sun but also on Earth - in a lattice or not. Nature just does not favor any high Q process where this level of energy must be carried away by massless or nearly massless (neutrino) entities. D +T has such an incredibly larger cross-section than D+D for just this reason - there you have a high mass neutron to carry away the bulk of the energy, and consequently your cross section is thousands of magnitudes higher because of that one factor. And wave transfer also qualifies as massless, so it is definitely not a favored process. And at any rate, there must be some arguable mass-energy transfer mechanism between the nascent He and the lattice beyond wave dynamics. To say it is just "coupled" is meaningless. How is it coupled (is it purely a deBroglie thing or does it involve kinetics?). Frank Z's observation "The positive temperature coefficient of cold fusion does not bode well for the deBroglie path" is very relevant here and should eliminate pure wave coupling from consideration. When you telegraph those temperature coefficients back to the matrix, you get huge relative variations at angstrom dimensions, and no wave-based mechanism could be that flexible to this kind of variability. The world would just fall apart if this could happen. > RvS I am however surprised that you haven't come up yet with Richard Blue's argument that there is a speed of light limitation on the energy of the reaction which this type of coupling will support. (Which I must admit I haven't yet been able to even find, let alone fathom. Perhaps Ed Storms can help out on this one?) Well, it is a good argument but one doesn't want to clutter up a post with too much of Blue's logic - although he is quite perceptive at times but usually obstinate at other times. Actually, I really wish we had an intelligent skeptic on this forum, as some of these arguments we are tossing around need to be refined further, and most of us here "want to believe" in the process to such a degree that we seldom raise objections (unless the "standard" rationalizations get just too improbable, as in the case of lattice coupling). In the case of dissipating 24 MeV - so that it is unmeasureable as photon radiation, the speed of light limitation would certainly come into play. But, even without that major problem, consider this: if your GM radiation monitor was sensitive to 10 KeV, then that means that the first step of lattice coupling would have to involve over 2000 simultaneous and approximately equal energy transfers (wave or otherwise) to avoid detection. Whereas, in the matrix cavity itself (FCC crystal) the number of initial close routes for this are limited to 6-20 arguable adjacent atoms, in that there are only so many adjacent Pd atoms that can be disrupted before the putative transfer-wavelength gets to ridiculous proportions. So that observation seems to negate a single large first step and therefore, at best it doesn't seem like it could be a smooth process - even if the "positive temperature coefficient" problem could be overcome, which is doubtful. But most of all, being human in this analysis, we are often all led back to those amazing SEM images showing the vortex implosion. This is clearly not evidence for any kind of coupling and/or energy dissipation process. Explosions simply do not look that way, at least at the large scales we are used to seeing for normal explosions. This is a clear *implosion* in my mind - not an explosion, at least at the start of the reaction. If anything, it looks to me like the images are showing that much of the energy is actually EXITING the matrix through implosion, rather than being dissipated. How can that be? Where is the exit path in a vortex implosion? We have no other choice but to consider an extra-dimensional path and the implications of Dirac's sea. Perhaps this loss of energy by implosion is a result of there being a *local deficit* of mass/energy in some hidden medium (Dirac's sea) that must be replenished ! Why could there be a local deficit - Clearly, that deficit must be a vestige of energy having already been withdraw more gradually in advance. Don't give me that disbelieving scowl. In QM it is common for time reversed reactions at this scale, is it not? OK. Things start getting really weird when you jump into Dirac's sea with your QM life preserver, so if I am getting too far out on the plank, let me know as I see some sharks circling as we speak... Jones From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 29 08:08:55 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2TG8ldk008784; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 08:08:48 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2TG8kgY008764; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 08:08:46 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 08:08:46 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Sender: jack mail3.centurytel.net Message-ID: <406848AA.645F1320 centurytel.net> Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 16:02:50 +0000 From: "Taylor J. Smith" X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0C-Caldera (X11; I; Linux 2.2.5-15 i486) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: LENT-CANR - too little too late? References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; name="xvor" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="xvor" Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53812 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Hi All, Some more info on the cyclical patterns of global warming. Jack Smith --------------------------- http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2004/03/01/MNGEL5B7VE1.DTL CHANGING CLIMATE Going to depths for evidence of global warming Heating trend in North Pacific baffles researchers Keay Davidson, San Francisco Chronicle Science Writer Monday, March 1, 2004 A puzzling heating trend on the bottom of the North Pacific has left oceanographers scratching their heads. Since 1985, just south of the Aleutian Islands and about 3 miles beneath the waves, in a pitch-black realm haunted by "Finding Nemo"-style fish with nasty fangs and glowing antennae, the temperature has risen by a tiny fraction of a degree -- five-thousandths of a degree Centigrade, to be exact. Sounds slight, right? But the temperature shouldn't be rising at all, or hardly at all, over such a geologically short time, according to respected computer models. The history of science shows that slight discrepancies occasionally lead to big discoveries, hence oceanographers are carefully scrutinizing the find. "We find that the deepest waters of the North Pacific Ocean have warmed significantly across the entire width of the ocean basin," Japanese and Canadian scientists report in the current issue of the journal Nature. Masao Fukasawa of the Japan Marine Science and Technology Center in Yokosuka, Japan, and five other researchers discovered the temperature change by going to sea on three research vessels and measuring deep-water temperatures across the North Pacific. Then they compared those temperature measurements to measurements made by researchers in 1985. The warming isn't caused by an impending El Niρo, one of those quasi- cyclical Pacific warming episodes that turn California either into a floodplain or a drought land, experts say. That's because El Niρos concentrate farther south and in shallower water. Nor can the warming be blamed on undersea volcanic eruptions -- not easily, anyway. Volcanoes heat water only over short distances, whereas the observed deep-sea warming stretches from one side of the North Pacific to the other, the scientists say. Climate scientist Andrew Weaver, of the University of Victoria in British Columbia, said the undersea-volcanism possibility "was one of the first things I thought about" when he read the Nature paper. Even so, Weaver, who isn't connected with the Fukasawa team, doubts that explanation because the warming is so uniform over a large area, whereas undersea volcanism tends to be along midocean ridges. The warming is especially strange because the deep waters of the North Pacific are an old folks' home of the global ocean -- a sluggish, bone- chilling abyss where, according to theory, nothing happens very fast. Here are some of the world's "oldest" oceanic waters, about 800 years old. That is, they began sinking from the ocean surface to the seafloor during the days of the Vikings. Or so scientists assumed. Now, the Nature article reports that by some unknown means and much faster than assumed, the solar-heated water is finding its way to the ocean floor in decades, not centuries. In fact, the researchers estimate it reached the bottom within 50 years. But how? The Fukasawa team's findings show a warming in the deep North Pacific over a "shorter time scale and larger spatial scale than (has) ever been believed," Fukasawa said in an e-mail. "As (far) as I know, our result is the first which shows such a large-scale temperature change in the global thermohaline circulation," that is, in global heat and salt circulation via ocean currents. Joseph Reid, a veteran oceanographer at Scripps Institution of Oceanography in La Jolla (San Diego County), not associated with the research, said the undersea heating "is surprisingly large over that period of time, some 20 years. It's the first convincing evidence of warming at that depth. I can say I was surprised." It's much too soon to blame global warming for the deep-sea warming, Reid and other experts caution. "To go from this (observation) to say, 'This is global warming,' is just a guess," Reid said. In any case, "this (Fukasawa result) is something that should be watched very carefully." At the very least, the Fukasawa finding indicates that computer models of ocean circulation -- which are vital for monitoring climate change -- are badly in need of a tuneup. The discovery was not explicitly predicted by any known computer models of ocean circulation. This issue of computer-model reliability is more than academic. Humanity's fate could be foretold by future, improved computer models of the ocean. That's because the ocean is the 800-pound gorilla of the global climate. It stores an enormous amount of solar heat -- it is a "1,000 times bigger heat 'sink' ... than the atmosphere," Fukasawa said. In temperate zones, many coastal cities (like San Francisco) have mild, Mediterranean-style climates partly because offshore waters store excess heat in hot weather and release heat into the atmosphere during the winter, moderating the thermometer's ups and downs. Hence the forecasting of future climate relies partly on the answer to this question: How long does the ocean store heat before dumping it back into the atmosphere? Normally, ocean currents circulate the heat vertically and horizontally throughout the sea, from pole to pole, much as cooling fluids circulate through a refrigerator or air conditioner. A slight disruption in currents can bring climate change. For example: After an ice age ends, melting glaciers unleash fresh water into the sea. The fresh water dilutes the salty, heat-bearing ocean current so much that it becomes too low-density and, hence, too buoyant to continue sinking into the depths where it would normally cool off. Instead, the current dumps its stored heat into the atmosphere, worsening the post-glacial warming trend. In that regard: Could the undersea warming be an omen of a recently hypothesized cataclysm -- a global breakdown in oceanic circulation? In recent years, researchers have uncovered evidence that the "conveyor belt" of ocean heat and salt circulation repeatedly broke down during prehistoric times, disrupting global climate. Consider that the Gulf Stream ferries warm water across the North Atlantic, keeping Europe relatively warm. If the northward current stalled like a broken conveyor belt, the Thames might freeze and the Eiffel Tower might sprout icicles. Some scientists, notably climate guru Wallace Broecker of Columbia University, speculate that present global warming might bring another breakdown in thermohaline circulation in the foreseeable future. Where scientific speculators tread, Hollywood is rarely far behind. In the forthcoming science-fiction thriller "The Day After Tomorrow," due in theaters in late May, a breakdown of thermohaline circulation figures in the onscreen climatic catastrophe. Luckily, audiences can safely tell themselves, "It's only a movie." While thermohaline breakdowns happened many times over the past 100,000 years, these occurred during major ice ages when there was enough melting ice to flush Niagaras of fresh water into the sea and to disrupt current buoyancy, Weaver said. By contrast, conditions today are too different for such a grandiose disaster. E-mail Keay Davidson at kdavidson sfchronicle.com. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 29 08:19:39 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2TGJRdk011674; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 08:19:28 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2TGJQ8Z011663; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 08:19:26 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 08:19:26 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-Id: <6.0.3.0.2.20040329110021.01cd74b0 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell mindspring.com@pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.3.0 Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 11:19:34 -0500 To: vortex-L eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: Sun vaporize earth - my arithmetic Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53813 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: I have computed approximately how long it would take the full power of the sun to vaporize Planet Earth. I would appreciate if someone would check my arithmetic. Various Web sources estimate one to three days. I came up with 28 hours. Here are the numbers: Sun's energy: 3.8E26 watts Mass of Earth: 6E27 grams Fe (assume it is all Fe) Fe: 1535 deg C melting point 2750 deg C boiling point 13.8 KJ/mol heat of fusion 349 KJ/mol heat of vaporization specific heat 0.44 J/g http://www.webelements.com/webelements/elements/text/Fe/heat.html 1 mol Fe = 56 g Assume average starting temperature of the earth 30 deg C. 6500 J/g to vaporize 1 g Fe 3.9E31 joules to vaporize earth 102,630 seconds of sun's output = 28.5 hours This is for the entire output of the sun. I suppose if the Earth stopped orbiting and fell into the sun it would only absorb a fraction of the output and it would take longer than this to vaporize. That surprises me. The point is to back up my assertion that energy is the most abundant resource in the solar system. Water is the most abundant substance on earth. It is ironic that mankind has pretty much stopped fighting wars over resources, but the two things we still fight to kill for are energy and water. It is a measure of how stupid our governments are. - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 29 09:51:27 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2THpIvt007516; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 09:51:18 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2THpF7V007494; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 09:51:15 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 09:51:15 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <006b01c415b6$365cd060$8837fea9 cpq> From: "Jones Beene" To: References: <6.0.3.0.2.20040329110021.01cd74b0 pop.mindspring.com> Subject: Re: Sun vaporize earth - my arithmetic Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 09:49:39 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ultra5.eskimo.com id i2THp7vt007449 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53814 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Don't know how precise you intend to get with this, but if you want a fairly accurate time frame before vaporization, you must also consider how fast the earth radiates-off the energy input and how effective increased surface vaporization is at scattering the incoming radiation. The secondary radiation rate is a function of the temperature, so as the temperature rises the radiation rate rises in step and long before you even get to deep subsurface melting, your surface vaporization would scatter the incoming level to reach an equilibrium point with the outgoing that varied with the distance and surface temperature. IOW earth would probably take many years to ever vaporize totally from its present orbit, even if the sun's present total output could be focused on us from it present distance, because the downshifted solar radiation will reach equilibrium with the earth's secondary re-radiation rate, probably at a surface temperature of around 2000 degree C, far lower than many metals vaporize. However once enough surface mass was lost to vaporization, then the earths orbit would shorten. It would take a complex computer program to include all the dynamics, but it would probably be a considerable time frame, depending on other assumptions (like how the sun's radiation could be focused and what would be the maximum flux that could be transferable to our orbit over that distance.) Jones From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 29 10:20:06 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2TIJvdk009380; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 10:19:57 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2TIJkI9009307; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 10:19:46 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 10:19:46 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-Id: <6.0.3.0.2.20040329130158.01cd74d8 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell mindspring.com@pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.3.0 Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 13:19:51 -0500 To: vortex-L eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: Re: Sun vaporize earth - my arithmetic Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53815 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Jones Beene writes: > Don't know how precise you intend to get with this . . . Not too precise. I just want to confirm it is ~28 hours and not 28 seconds or 28 weeks. > IOW earth would probably take many years to ever vaporize totally > from its present orbit, even if the sun's present total output could be > focused on us from it present distance . . . I was thinking more of picking up the whole planet and chucking it into the sun, or holding it close to the surface. I had not thought how to direct the entire output of the sun toward the earth. Perhaps with mirrors? Needless to say, chucking the planet into the sun would present significant engineering difficulties. It is not a plausible scenario. However, it is plausible to imagine that in the distant future people may use any significant fraction of the sun's output for some gigantic engineer project. I have been reading a book published by Scientific American, "Extreme Science, The Highway of Light and other engineering oddities" (Sci. Am., 2001). It includes speculation about future technologies. The title refers to the technique of driving spacecraft with ground-based lasers. When I read about this technique years ago some skeptics said it would never be practical for interstellar travel because it would take such a massive amounts of energy. I recall one of them said it was out of the question because it would take more than all the energy generated on earth. When I read that, I thought: "So what? A space based system tapping the sun could produce a million times more energy than we generate on Earth, and nobody would notice or care." That is a typical narrow minded skeptical objection. Arthur Clark once characterized such objections as saying, "blimps will never fly faster than sound." - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 29 11:09:03 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2TJ8svt031820; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 11:08:55 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2TJ8fV5031746; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 11:08:41 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 11:08:41 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <009501c415c1$084dbbc0$8837fea9 cpq> From: "Jones Beene" To: References: <6.0.3.0.2.20040329130158.01cd74d8 pop.mindspring.com> Subject: Re: Sun vaporize earth - my arithmetic Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 11:07:07 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ultra5.eskimo.com id i2TJ8Wvt031703 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53816 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Jed, > I was thinking more of picking up the whole planet and chucking it into the sun, or holding it close to the surface. I had not thought how to direct the entire output of the sun toward the earth. Perhaps with mirrors? I don't mean to sound obstinate and I will look closer at your math but, even thown into the sun, it would take some extended time to vaporize the earth because of energy transfer dynamics. By analogy, lets say you heat a cast iron skillet to red hot. There is enought potential energy there in theory to vaporize several ounces of water immediately, even if you shut off the flame. BUT take a few drops of water (or spittal, if you want of use another analogy) and aim that towards the surface and it will bounce around for a seeming eternity on the skillet before succumbing to the heat - its just a fact of thermodynamics that mass transfers can only proceed so fast in a given energy spectrum. > However, it is plausible to imagine that in the distant future people may use any significant fraction of the sun's output for some gigantic engineer project. Yes, indeed. But to vaporize anything of planetary size, you need to make that energy ouput COHERENT like the laser you mention. This gives many orders of magnitute more energy density, or flux. This might not be impossible to pull, however. But you might also need to choose a laser frequency that is not scattered by exiting vapor of whatever is your target - and that would mean something up in the x-ray region - still not impossible but things are getting dicier. However for externally powered rocket acceleration, the scattering might be advantageous in a number of ways, so something like a infrared laser might be ideal. > I have been reading a book published by Scientific American, "Extreme Science, The Highway of Light and other engineering oddities" (Sci. Am., 2001). It includes speculation about future technologies. They probably mention that SciFi story (maybe of Arthur Clarke) about using thousands of special robots from earth to convert the iron in a planet like Mercury into an extremely large thin mirror - and that may be doable - but upshifting and cohering that energy into an x-ray laser is beyond anything that I can imagine. Jones From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 29 11:51:33 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2TJpNdk008950; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 11:51:24 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2TJpKiM008927; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 11:51:20 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 11:51:20 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 10:57:24 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: Sun vaporize earth - my arithmetic Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53817 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: >I have computed approximately how long it would take the full power of the >sun to vaporize Planet Earth. I would appreciate if someone would check my >arithmetic. Various Web sources estimate one to three days. I came up with >28 hours. Here are the numbers: > >Sun's energy: 3.8E26 watts (actually sun's power = 3.87E26 W) >Mass of Earth: 6E27 grams Fe (assume it is all Fe) > >Fe: >1535 deg C melting point >2750 deg C boiling point >13.8 KJ/mol heat of fusion = 247.3 j/g >349 KJ/mol heat of vaporization = 6232 j/g >specific heat 0.44 J/g > >http://www.webelements.com/webelements/elements/text/Fe/heat.html > >1 mol Fe = 56 g >Assume average starting temperature of the earth 30 deg C. > >6500 J/g to vaporize 1 g Fe 6479 j/g >3.9E31 joules to vaporize earth > >102,630 seconds of sun's output = 28.5 hours > >This is for the entire output of the sun. I suppose if the Earth stopped >orbiting and fell into the sun it would only absorb a fraction of the >output and it would take longer than this to vaporize. That surprises me. > >The point is to back up my assertion that energy is the most abundant >resource in the solar system. Water is the most abundant substance on >earth. It is ironic that mankind has pretty much stopped fighting wars over >resources, but the two things we still fight to kill for are energy and >water. It is a measure of how stupid our governments are. > >- Jed The above numbers all look roughly correct to me. The power density of the sun is amazingly low. I should note that if the earth fell into the sun it should vaporize fairly fast due to its kinetic energy and high internal solar density. Using 1.979E30 kg for mass of sun and 860,000 mi for diameter, or 6.92E8 meters, I get an escape velocity = sqrt (2Gm/r) = 6.18E5 m/s for the sun. That gives energy/gram = 0.5*(1 gm)*(v^2)/(1 g) = 1.9E8 J/g, or 190 megajoules per gram, or about 29000 times the heat required to vaporize the iron. That's a total collision energy of (1.9E8 J/g)(6E27 g) = 1.14E36 J. The sun's output is only 3.8E26 J/s. The collision energy is thus 2.9 billion seconds, or about 91 years of solar heat output. If that kind of energy were radiated even over the period of a year, due to some earth sized body hitting the sun, the earth would be a very crispy critter. This shows why I suggest that a Nemesis cloud need not produce earth impacts to produce major extinctions. A sufficient tonnage of solar impacts would be plenty good enough. They should be capable of generating large solar flares and thus, if nothing else, momentarily greatly increasing the solar radiating area. Hopefully my computations are correct. (You never know!) 8^) Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 29 11:58:46 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2TJwdvt013305; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 11:58:40 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2TJwb1k013281; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 11:58:37 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 11:58:37 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 11:04:39 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: Sun vaporize earth - my arithmetic Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53818 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 11:07 AM 3/29/4, Jones Beene wrote: > >They probably mention that SciFi story (maybe of Arthur Clarke) about >using thousands of special robots from earth to convert the iron in a >planet like Mercury into an extremely large thin mirror - and that may be >doable - but upshifting and cohering that energy into an x-ray laser is >beyond anything that I can imagine. Computations of this kind are based on the exponential growth rates of economies. If an economy grows at a sustained (compounded) rate, then a task of any size is eventually, and even amazingly quickly, possible. Once robots are in the picture (in an economy) the sky is not even the limit. Tasks like consuming planets to build a device, say a spherical energy collector and habitable surface around a star, are soon no longer out of the question. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 29 12:00:41 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2TK0Tvt013902; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 12:00:30 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2TK0SRD013880; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 12:00:28 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 12:00:28 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: rick+highsurf.com mail.highsurf.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 10:00:05 -1000 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Rick Monteverde Subject: Re: Life On Ice Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53819 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Nasa said this rock was harder than the other rocks. How could it be ice and be harder? - Rick From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 29 12:22:30 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2TKMKAK017607; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 12:22:21 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2TKMEH5017581; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 12:22:14 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 12:22:14 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <4068856D.6010303 rtpatlanta.com> Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 15:22:05 -0500 From: "Terry Blanton" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Life On Ice References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <0zFDtB.A.pSE.2VIaAB ultra6.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53820 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Rick Monteverde wrote: >Nasa said this rock was harder than the other rocks. How could it be ice and be harder? > Maybe it's pure quartz? From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 29 12:24:51 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2TKOkAK018068; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 12:24:46 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2TKOjDV018056; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 12:24:45 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 12:24:45 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <4068860C.4010703 rtpatlanta.com> Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 15:24:44 -0500 From: "Terry Blanton" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Sun vaporize earth - my arithmetic References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53821 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Horace Heffner wrote: >They should be capable of generating >large solar flares and thus, if nothing else, momentarily greatly >increasing the solar radiating area. > There has been more than one incidence of coronal mass ejections which appear to be caused by comets plunging into the sun as evidenced by SOHO images. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 29 12:43:20 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2TKhC0a025815; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 12:43:12 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2TKh9vB025793; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 12:43:09 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 12:43:09 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-Id: <6.0.3.0.2.20040329154006.00b23578 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell mindspring.com@pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.3.0 Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 15:42:07 -0500 To: vortex-L eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: OFF TOPIC More about voting machines Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53822 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Here is a letter I just sent to a low-level Georgia Election Official. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I recently sent you an informal report I wrote about my experiences Georgia's voting machines. In it, I wondered whether it would be possible to link voters with their ballots, given the information that is collected at the precincts. A recent report in "IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy 2004" shows that it would be very easy. Three computer experts surreptitiously acquired and analyzed the source code for Diebold voting machines, from a corporate file called "rob-georgia." (This is the program code that was loaded into Georgia's voting machines.) The experts found that all individual records are preserved in the order they are cast. Individual records are sometimes even transmitted in plaintext, in the order cast. This paper also shows that voting machines can easily be hacked, all machines have the same password (which is written plaintext in the source code), and in many other ways they fail to meet elementary security standards. See: http://avirubin.com/vote.pdf Here is a long article about voting machines that confirms some of my worst fears about them: "How E-voting Threatens Democracy," Wired Magazine http://www.wired.com/news/evote/0,2645,62790,00.html?tw=wn_tophead_1 I suggest you bring this information to the attention of other county elections officials. - Jed Rothwell From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 29 12:51:16 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2TKp10a027970; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 12:51:02 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2TKp0gx027946; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 12:51:00 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 12:51:00 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f From: Josh8103579212 aol.com Message-ID: <12b.3df79adf.2d99e62a aol.com> Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 15:50:50 EST Subject: EVOLUTIONARY Electrical tech's video demos To: vortex-l eskimo.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1080593450" X-Mailer: 9.0 for Windows sub 5106 Resent-Message-ID: <_mYqRB.A.m0G.zwIaAB ultra5.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53823 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: -------------------------------1080593450 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Language: en www.evolutionarytechnologies.us currently down loading is slow. Video's ca= n=20 be downloaded of unexplainable by science electrical conversion and=20 conversation premises and two separate neutrino gathering/converter device= s. The=20 single phase 220 V. AC to 3 Phase device totally changes the current 120 yea= r=20 old scientific understanding of AC current.=20 The device utilizes the now wasted kinetic power loss energy already=20 contained in the delivery process. The device converts those aspects into a=20= new no=20 power loss form of industrial 3 phase and causes a 50% mech. performance inc= rease=20 to occur in electrical motors. There is also a more advanced 110 V to 3 Phas= e=20 premise.=20 The conversion process also draws free electrons from the earth and feeds=20 that aspect back to the grid to help compensate for usage. As far as i know= =20 Present converters in the market place cannot compete. =20 The other two devices are different neutrino gathering/converters. That=20 belong to contacts. One is starting a vehicle with the battery disconnected= . The=20 other will produce 18 watts. Larger versions of that device exist. below is= A=20 review by a Ph.D EE=20 In a message dated 3/7/2004 1:25:28 PM Eastern Standard Time,=20 dr_deleted hotmail.com writes: I have spent many hours discussing the details of these technologies with=20 Jack Carey, and he seems completely sincere in his claims. Some have critic= ized=20 Jack as being non-technical. It is unfortunate that some individuals=20 criticize the works of others, without taking the time to investigate furthe= r than the=20 ends of their own noses.=20 My impression of Jack, is that, although more business oriented than=20 technical, his technical information does seem to come from serious research= ers, which=20 he has worked with. Furthermore Jack is a promoter, and understandable not=20 interested in giving away vital information, to this technology. The videos are nothing short of amazing. Anyone who actually works with hig= h=20 power electrical equipment would immediately know that it is impossible to=20 run 10 hp worth of motors, a large drill press, as well as lighting up an=20 arc welder, and start welding things, and all simultaneously running off a=20 single 3 hp phase converter. Yet, this is exactly what is shown in the vide= o. =20 Other footage on the video shows a researcher from =E2=80=98Infinite Energy=20= Magazine=E2=80=99=20 using a 3 phase power meter to measure the electrical power going to a 5 hp=20 air compressor.=20 The investigator is completely amazed to see 400W driving a 5 hp air=20 compressor, as well he should be! Five hp is equivalent to several thousand= watts=20 of electrical power. Even if the motor is not running under full load, 400W= =20 should not be able to turn the motor, but it does. =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D '''' REPLY CLAIRIFICATION In the current world. The commerical large two=20 stage compressor shown operational in the video calls for a 5 Hp. But that= =20 has been replaced with a 3 Hp. motor. Because a 3 is all that is needed beca= use=20 of the claimed new form of evolutionary cost effective no power loss 3 phase= =20 electricity the converter is creating from single phase. Contact a Manuf. of= =20 Air Com. A 5 Hp motor is used for a reason. The motor has to be of a certain= =20 size in order to operate the Com. head. =20 That occurence translates into currently unimaginal and unexplainable with= =20 known knowledge EFFICIENCY. Simple common sense says If a 3 performs the=20 same as a 5. Then less power is required. In this case apparently far less.=20= Now=20 factor in a claimed feed back to grid power factor occurrence the device=20 creates. That seperate power factor is derived from free electrons that are=20 provided by the earth. Naturally at this point I do not expect anyone to b= elieve=20 that.=20 Lets explore the business side. Now factor in just industrial electrical=20 usage on a planetary scale. According to the DOE 64% of the electricity coms= umed=20 in the US is being consumed by electric motors. Now factor in projected=20 electrical usage will double in one generation. Are we looking at spending s= ay 400=20 billion this century to upgrade the grid and built more generating plants? =20 Would that be necessary if we could drastically reduce usage as the premise=20 indicates? To be able to see a possibility of that magnitude requires seriou= s=20 vision. The question is who can think at that level. The answer is very few.= =20 Believe me I have searched for ones that can. DISCLAIMER He is only rendering an an objective evaluation. Derived from=20 viewing video's and phone discussions He is not indorsing the claims. Nor i= s he=20 supporting me or are we associated in any way. I will say His written=20 grammar does excede mine.=20 Possible new understandings are not easy to establish. Especially when there= =20 is a 120 years of science that totally contradicts the purposed claims. Main= =20 stream Science thinks they know all there is about the dominate aspect of ou= r=20 civilization AC Current. If the claims are factual they are in for a very ru= de=20 awaking. I would like to thank the Eng. for the time and effort he dedicated= =20 in order to provide the unbiased non judgmental evaluation. =20 =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Jack tells me that the phase converter produces a new form of electricity,=20 which causes the motor to run cool, and up to 50% more efficiently than if r= un=20 on normal electricity. He says there are two components of normal electrici= ty,=20 a =E2=80=98work factor=E2=80=99 component and a non-useful =E2=80=98heat fac= tor=E2=80=99 component. The=20 phase converter converts the normally unused (and counter productive) =E2= =80=98heat=20 factor=E2=80=99 in to a useful =E2=80=98work factor=E2=80=99, making the 3 p= hase motors run up to 50%=20 more efficiently. If what Jack is saying about the video footage is correct, this implies that= =20 new physical laws may have to be constructed to describe this new form of=20 electricity. We should remember that when the physical world tells us=20 something new and unexpected is going on, the only responsible action, as a=20 researcher, is to fully investigate the new phenomenon. The evidence presen= ted=20 in these videos is definitely something worthy of further investigation. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------= -- --------------------------- -------------------------------1080593450 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Language: en
www.evolution= arytechnologies.us  currently do= wn loading  is slow. Video's can be downloaded of unexplainable by= science  electrical conversion and conversation  premises  a= nd two separate neutrino gathering/converter devices.  The single phase= 220 V. AC to 3 Phase device totally changes the current 120 year old scient= ific understanding of AC  current.=20
 
The device utilizes the now wasted kinetic=20= power loss energy already contained in the delivery process. The device conv= erts those aspects into a new no power loss form of industrial 3 phase and c= auses a 50% mech. performance increase to occur in electrical motors. There=20= is also a more advanced 110 V to 3 Phase premise.
 
The conversion process also draws free elec= trons from the earth and feeds that aspect back to the grid to help com= pensate for usage.  As far as i know  Present converters in the ma= rket place cannot compete.      
 
 The other two devices are different n= eutrino gathering/converters. That belong to contacts.  One is starting= a vehicle with the battery disconnected. The other will produce 18 watts. L= arger versions of that device exist.  below is A review by a Ph.D EE
In a message dated 3/7/2004 1:25:28 PM Eastern Standard Time, dr_de= leted hotmail.com writes:
I have spent many hours discussing the details= of these technologies with Jack Carey, and he seems completely sincere in h= is claims.  Some have criticized Jack as being non-technical.  It=20= is unfortunate that some individuals criticize the works of others, without=20= taking the time to investigate further than the ends of their own noses.&nbs= p;
My impression of Jack, is that, although more busine= ss oriented than technical, his technical information does seem to come from= serious researchers, which he has worked with.  Furthermore Jack is a=20= promoter, and understandable not interested in giving away vital information= , to this technology.

The videos are nothing short of amazing. =20= Anyone who actually works with high power electrical equipment would immedia= tely know that it is impossible to run 10 hp worth of motors, a large drill=20= press, as well as lighting up an
arc welder, and start welding things, a= nd all simultaneously running off a single 3 hp phase converter.  Yet,=20= this is exactly what is shown in the video.  Other footage on the video= shows a researcher from =E2=80=98Infinite Energy Magazine=E2=80=99 using a=20= 3 phase power meter to measure the electrical power going to a 5 hp air comp= ressor. 
 
  The investigator is completely amazed to see=20= 400W driving a 5 hp air compressor, as well he should be!  Five hp is e= quivalent to several thousand watts of electrical power.  Even if the m= otor is not running under full load, 400W should not be able to turn the mot= or, but it does.
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D
 '''' REPLY  CLAIRIFICATION In the current= world.  The commerical large two stage compressor shown operation= al in the video calls for a 5 Hp.   But that has been replace= d with a 3 Hp. motor. Because a 3 is all that is needed because of the claim= ed new form of evolutionary cost effective no power loss 3 phase electricity= the converter is creating from single phase. Contact a Manuf. of Air Com. A= 5 Hp motor is used for a reason. The motor has to be of a certain size in o= rder to operate the Com. head.  
 
  That occurence translates into currently unim= aginal and unexplainable with known knowledge  EFFICIENCY.  Simple= common sense says  If a 3 performs the same as a 5. Then les= s power is required. In this case apparently far less. Now factor=20= in a claimed feed back to grid power factor occurrence the device creates. T= hat seperate power factor is derived from free electrons that are provided b= y the earth.   Naturally at this point I do not expect anyone to b= elieve that. 
 
 Lets explore the business side.  Now fact= or in just industrial electrical usage on a planetary scale. According to th= e DOE 64% of the electricity comsumed in the US is being consumed by electri= c motors. Now factor in projected electrical usage will double in one genera= tion. Are we looking at spending say 400 billion this century to upgrade the= grid and built more generating plants?  = ;Would that be necessary if we could drastically reduce usage as the premise= indicates? To be able to see a possibility of that magnitude requ= ires serious vision. The question is who can think at that level. The answer= is very few.  Believe me I have searched for ones that can.
 
 DISCLAIMER  He is only rendering an=20= an objective evaluation. Derived from viewing video's and phone discussions=20=  He is not indorsing the claims. Nor is he supporting me or are we asso= ciated in any way.   I will say  His written grammar does exc= ede mine.
 
Possible new understandings are not easy to establis= h. Especially when there is a 120 years of science that totally contradicts=20= the purposed claims. Main stream Science thinks they know all there is=20= about the dominate aspect of our civilization AC Current. If the claims are=20= factual they are in for a very rude awaking. I would like to thank the Eng.=20= for the time and effort he dedicated in order to provide the unbia= sed non judgmental evaluation.       &nbs= p;      
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
Jack tells me that the phase converter produc= es a new form of electricity, which causes the motor to run cool, and up to=20= 50% more efficiently than if run on normal electricity.  He says there=20= are two components of normal electricity, a =E2=80=98work factor=E2=80=99 co= mponent and a non-useful =E2=80=98heat factor=E2=80=99 component.  The=20= phase converter converts the normally unused (and counter productive) =E2= =80=98heat factor=E2=80=99 in to a useful =E2=80=98work factor=E2=80=99, mak= ing the 3 phase motors run up to 50% more efficiently.

If what Jack i= s saying about the video footage is correct, this implies that new physical=20= laws may have to be constructed to describe this new form of electricity.&nb= sp; We should remember that when the physical world tells us
something n= ew and unexpected is going on, the only responsible action, as a researcher,= is to fully investigate the new phenomenon.  The evidence presented in= these videos is definitely something worthy of further investigation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------= ------------------------------------ -------------------------------1080593450-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 29 13:07:29 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2TL7PAK028117; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 13:07:26 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2TL7Ldo028088; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 13:07:21 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 13:07:21 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 12:13:30 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: Life On Ice Resent-Message-ID: <5U5ruD.A.w2G.JAJaAB ultra6.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53824 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 10:00 AM 3/29/4, Rick Monteverde wrote: >Nasa said this rock was harder than the other rocks. How could it be ice >and be harder? > >- Rick The statemen that it is harder is based upon the assumption that it is a rock. If it is not a rock, but rather has other mechanism to chenge the grinding properties, ie. melting/refreezing and organic matter disengaging the diamond grit from the surface, then that determination can not be trusted. We saw similar assumptions and what appear to be bad interpretations with regard to Opportunity, e.g. when it appeared the tool stalled due to the positioning mechanism (a knerled ball) sinking into the "rock" and stalling the grinder. Never saw any correction to that announcement did we? For this reason it seems to me reasonable to speculate on things other than rocks being ground on occasion. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 29 13:15:26 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2TLFI0a000941; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 13:15:19 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2TLFHXq000923; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 13:15:17 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 13:15:17 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 12:21:20 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: hidden Mazatzal pieces Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53825 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: >Before transmission to Earth, the PanCam adjusts each image so that the >maximum value in the image is 255, and so that the minimum value in the >image is 0. Apparently, this improves their compression performance. These >images have to be adjusted back upon arrival to Earth by using calibration >data supplied in the transmission, which is unique to each image. This image >processing has several repercussions for us: Do you have any URL references regarding this? Did you get this from NASA directly? >The problem is illustrated the best in the first two images on this page, >(if it loads). > >http://216.169.108.12/golddirectory/mars/mars4.htm > >The ONLY difference between the two pictures is that the second one contains >a small section showing a shiny part of the rover. Maybe I've goofed up and got the wrong photos, but it looks like both photos have the rover parts in them. I played around with the photos and it appears both do have a significant amount of blue in them. Both have a white reference area too. It looks like brightness and contrast are significantly different though, like the light photo had a much longer exposure time. It seems to me difficult to attribute all this to data compression problems from the algorithm described. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 29 13:17:31 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2TLGw0a001503; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 13:17:00 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2TLGsYS001470; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 13:16:54 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 13:16:54 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <00fd01c415d2$ed305660$8837fea9 cpq> From: "Jones Beene" To: References: Subject: Re: Sun vaporize earth - my arithmetic Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 13:15:13 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ultra5.eskimo.com id i2TLGb0a001367 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53826 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Horace Heffner writes, > Once robots are in the picture (in an economy) the sky is not even the limit. > Tasks like consuming planets to build a device, say a spherical energy > collector and habitable surface around a star, are soon no longer out of > the question. Yes. BTW there is are a slew of interesting stories recently about NASAs real agenda being to ditch manned missions in favor of robotics ASAP (Hubble disownment being part of that ploy)... not really news, but it makes sense to me, so long as they concentrate on a Hubble robot first. As technology progresses flesh and blood astronauts seem more and more like a vanity kind of indulgence ... but then again, as a dedicated Neuromancer, William Gibson style... if I'm ever asked to be a guinea-pig for some kind of AI computer/human hybrid, I'll likely volunteer without blinking an eye... or was that a cursor? Jones From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 29 13:28:45 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2TLSZAK001428; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 13:28:35 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2TLSYq7001417; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 13:28:34 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 13:28:34 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <006001c415d4$bac79ab0$c828010a arghou.argcorp.argworldwide.com> From: "SnowDog" To: References: Subject: Re: hidden Mazatzal pieces Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 21:28:07 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Mar 2004 21:28:08.0908 (UTC) FILETIME=[BB1370C0:01C415D4] Resent-Message-ID: <8Aiq0.A.FW.BUJaAB ultra6.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53827 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: > >Before transmission to Earth, the PanCam adjusts each image so that the > >maximum value in the image is 255, and so that the minimum value in the > >image is 0. Apparently, this improves their compression performance. These > >images have to be adjusted back upon arrival to Earth by using calibration > >data supplied in the transmission, which is unique to each image. This image > >processing has several repercussions for us: > > > Do you have any URL references regarding this? Did you get this from NASA > directly? Yes, I'll try to send them tonight. The technical specifications of the PanCam also mention the adjustment. I may not have all the references I found, but I think I can find the relevant ones. If there is an archive of this mailing list, they should be in there, too, from around the first week of March. > >The problem is illustrated the best in the first two images on this page, > >(if it loads). > > > >http://216.169.108.12/golddirectory/mars/mars4.htm > > > >The ONLY difference between the two pictures is that the second one contains > >a small section showing a shiny part of the rover. > > > Maybe I've goofed up and got the wrong photos, but it looks like both > photos have the rover parts in them. I played around with the photos and > it appears both do have a significant amount of blue in them. Both have a > white reference area too. It looks like brightness and contrast are > significantly different though, like the light photo had a much longer > exposure time. It seems to me difficult to attribute all this to data > compression problems from the algorithm described. I'm confused. If you look at the first two images I've put together on this page, you'll see a bright object at the bottom of the second image, that's part of the Rover. This object is so bright that it's preventing any adjustment to the blue and green images, and is allowing the image to come out fairly well color-balanced, although it's a bit dark. The first image is so out of balance that it has very little red. The PanCam is adjusted to provide well-balanced exposure times for good color in white light. Hence, we get good color when we find pictures with shiny objects in them. Compare the first two pictures on this page. They are the same picture, taken just 20 minutes apart. Notice the shiny object at the bottom of the second image. http://216.169.108.12/golddirectory/mars/mars4.htm Craig From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 29 13:43:15 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2TLh7AK005451; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 13:43:10 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2TLh7Hh005442; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 13:43:07 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 13:43:07 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <011901c415d6$6d120a60$8837fea9 cpq> From: "Jones Beene" To: "vortex" Subject: Shades of Strangelove Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 13:40:16 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0116_01C41593.5E57BA80" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53828 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0116_01C41593.5E57BA80 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable http://tinyurl.com/343sr ------=_NextPart_000_0116_01C41593.5E57BA80 Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
http://tinyurl.com/343sr=
------=_NextPart_000_0116_01C41593.5E57BA80-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 29 13:49:43 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2TLncAK007267; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 13:49:38 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2TLnbAj007260; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 13:49:37 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 13:49:37 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <007501c415d7$b8c90430$c828010a arghou.argcorp.argworldwide.com> From: "SnowDog" To: References: <006001c415d4$bac79ab0$c828010a@arghou.argcorp.argworldwide.com> Subject: Re: hidden Mazatzal pieces Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 21:49:33 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Mar 2004 21:49:37.0550 (UTC) FILETIME=[BB2A9AE0:01C415D7] Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53829 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: I can't find too much from here at the office, but this is essentially it. There are numerous discussions about this on the web. In one discussion, the group found a NASA specialist who said that the adjustment data would not be available for several months. I also found something, somewhere, which offered an explanation for this algorithm. It apparently improves their compression performance. However, this is all I can find at the moment. Here's the key: "(4) rudimentary automatic exposure control capability to maximize the SNR of downlinked data while preventing data saturation." This is from the Cornell site: http://athena.cornell.edu/pdf/tb_pancam.pdf "Pancam will be commanded by and will return digital data directly to the rover computer. The computer provides the capability to perform a limited set of image processing tasks on Pancam data prior to transmission. These tasks include (1) bias and dark current subtraction, (2) electronic shutter effect correction, (3) bad pixel replacement, (4) rudimentary automatic exposure control capability to maximize the SNR of downlinked data while preventing data saturation, (5) image subsampling and subframing, and (6) image compression using a JPL-developed wavelet compression algorithm called ICER. " Here's a description by another amateur, who also found the problem. http://www.atsnn.com/story/30048.html Good Luck! Craig Haynie (Houston) From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 29 13:57:48 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2TLvR0a011923; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 13:57:27 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2TLvNcE011876; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 13:57:23 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 13:57:23 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f From: FZNIDARSIC aol.com Message-ID: <1d6.1d861a0f.2d99f5b7 aol.com> Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 16:57:11 EST Subject: Re: The myth of lattice coupling To: vortex-l eskimo.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_1d6.1d861a0f.2d99f5b7_boundary" X-Mailer: 8.0 for Windows sub 6800 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53830 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: --part1_1d6.1d861a0f.2d99f5b7_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 3/29/2004 10:24:05 AM Eastern Standard Time, jonesb9 pacbell.net writes: > We have no other choice but to consider an extra-dimensional path and the > implications of Dirac's sea. No, How about the one dimensional lowering of the Coulombic potential wall? Frank Znidarisic --part1_1d6.1d861a0f.2d99f5b7_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In a message dated 3/29/2004 10:24:= 05 AM Eastern Standard Time, jonesb9 pacbell.net writes:

We have no other choice but to=20= consider an extra-dimensional path and the implications of Dirac's sea.

No,  How about the one dimensional lowering of the Coulombic potential=20= wall?

Frank Znidarisic
--part1_1d6.1d861a0f.2d99f5b7_boundary-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 29 14:29:39 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2TMTT0a023578; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 14:29:30 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2TMTSCh023558; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 14:29:28 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 14:29:28 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <002401c415dd$e4fda3c0$c864a8c0 win98> From: To: References: Subject: Re: Life On Ice Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 01:33:31 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53831 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: From: "Horace Heffner" > At 10:00 AM 3/29/4, Rick Monteverde wrote: > >Nasa said this rock was harder than the other rocks. How could it be ice > >and be harder? > > > >- Rick > The blue layer is not ice, it appears, did not evaporated and very opaque. It also transformed to fine powder,may the ice crystal structure prevent such a fine powdering. I had noticed another layer top on the blue layer appeared transparent after brushing but before grinding. Grinding may removed this transparent layer which was really had to detect. Anyway grinding also exposed the native rock. And this may was hard to grinding. Rock appears be dressed by many layers, possibly by atmospheric processes. This suggest these layers contain ice and protected from sublimation by the upper lichen/dust layer. The blue material is a mystery. It could be a frozen chemical solution which not evaporate quickly ( after being exposed). A repeated water condensation/evaporation cycles my cause strong concentration of a chemical, which may be available in the environment in very low concentration. This "natural selection" may resulted to a non sublimating "frozen solution". Maybe this solution could be in gel form in the elevated temperatures. Grinding process appears to "detach" this layer partially from the native rock without leaving residues. This suggest this layer is independent from rock formation and behaved as a frozen liquid. One shoud examine the cross section of upper layer, whether they contain same blue things inside. Unfortunetly microscopic imager does not have color filters. > > The statemen that it is harder is based upon the assumption that it is a > rock. If it is not a rock, but rather has other mechanism to chenge the > grinding properties, ie. melting/refreezing and organic matter disengaging > the diamond grit from the surface, then that determination can not be > trusted. > > We saw similar assumptions and what appear to be bad interpretations with > regard to Opportunity, e.g. when it appeared the tool stalled due to the > positioning mechanism (a knerled ball) sinking into the "rock" and stalling > the grinder. Never saw any correction to that announcement did we? For > this reason it seems to me reasonable to speculate on things other than > rocks being ground on occasion. > > Regards, > > Horace Heffner > > Regards, hamdi ucar From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 29 14:33:35 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2TMXVAK018883; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 14:33:31 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2TMXQSj018848; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 14:33:26 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 14:33:26 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: rick+highsurf.com mail.highsurf.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <011901c415d6$6d120a60$8837fea9 cpq> References: <011901c415d6$6d120a60$8837fea9 cpq> Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 12:33:11 -1000 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Rick Monteverde Subject: Re: Shades of Strangelove Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ultra6.eskimo.com id i2TMXIAK018799 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53832 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: "Only a madman..." An effective ABM system would supposedly render the doomsday scenario at the end of the move "Dr. Strangelove" (MAD) less effective as a deterrent, thus making nuclear war more likely. It seemed like the US was trying to back away from the MAD philosophy in recent decades, and I don't understand why the Russians seem to dislike that trend. It can't be for a lack of madmen to worry about. Maybe the trend was itself just a sham, like Parksie says. Are they just trying to improve and reinforce the "A" in Mutual Assured Destruction? Come to think of it, a stealthy superfast scramjet would make a heck of an alternative to big bulky expensive ICBMs. It's just a contoured soup can with a liquid hydrogen squirter - how hard can that be? ;) http://www.cnn.com/2004/TECH/space/03/28/hypersonic.jet.flight/index.html - R. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 29 16:49:23 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2U0nICg018944; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 16:49:19 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2U0nGgw018927; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 16:49:16 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 16:49:16 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <4068C4A3.8080007 rtpatlanta.com> Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 19:51:47 -0500 From: Terry Blanton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Shades of Strangelove References: <011901c415d6$6d120a60$8837fea9 cpq> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53833 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Rick Monteverde wrote: >An effective ABM system would supposedly render the doomsday scenario at the end of the move "Dr. Strangelove" (MAD) less effective as a deterrent, thus making nuclear war more likely. > Unless such a system had been properly demonstrated to be 100% effective. If so, I doubt the technology is well known to us. ;-) From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 29 17:21:45 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2U1LXCg027793; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 17:21:33 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2U1LW5E027772; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 17:21:32 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 17:21:32 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net (Unverified) Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 16:27:47 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: The myth of lattice coupling Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53834 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 7:22 AM 3/29/4, Jones Beene wrote: >How can that be? Where is the exit path in a vortex implosion? I suggest that an energy exit path capable of balancing momentum, spin, and energy is neutrino pair creation. Such an unusual exit path may be provided by the effect of a multi-body lepton-hardron waveform collapse, which is an unlikely event outside a lattice. The residuals might be carried away by low energy uv photons. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 29 17:32:02 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2U1VvCg031045; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 17:31:58 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2U1VvYn031034; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 17:31:57 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 17:31:57 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <4068CE8C.9000201 rtpatlanta.com> Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 20:34:04 -0500 From: Terry Blanton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Wild Blueberry Pie Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53835 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: An analysis of the different types: >http://www.astrobio.net/news/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=896&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0< From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 29 17:57:10 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2U1v7Cg004082; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 17:57:07 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2U1v6SU004067; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 17:57:06 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 17:57:06 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Reply-To: From: "Keith Nagel" To: "Vortex" Subject: Wrapping URL test Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 21:22:52 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Importance: Normal X-Rcpt-To: Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53836 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Testing... http://www.astrobio.net/news/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=896&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0 >http://www.astrobio.net/news/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=896&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0< From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 29 19:01:33 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2U31M6l026500; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 19:01:23 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2U30jC9026322; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 19:00:45 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 19:00:45 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f From: Robin van Spaandonk To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: The myth of lattice coupling Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 13:00:32 +1000 Organization: Improving Message-ID: <6goh60lbicoukj3uovsoudvfch8j18r9ut 4ax.com> References: <79.25a14e27.2d997e94 aol.com> In-Reply-To: <79.25a14e27.2d997e94 aol.com> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ultra5.eskimo.com id i2U30V6l026228 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53837 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: In reply to FZNIDARSIC aol.com's message of Mon, 29 Mar 2004 08:28:52 -0500 (EST): Hi Frank, [snip] >In a message dated 3/28/2004 11:46:05 PM Eastern Standard Time, >rvanspaa bigpond.net.au writes: > >> Yesterday I posted a theoretical mechanism which would result in energetic >> alphas (and perhaps energetic electrons) rather than gamma rays. >> > >The process must conserve momentum and energy. The difference between the >mass energy of the reactants and the products is the excess Q of the reaction. >This extra energy must be dissipated. The dissipation process must conserve >both momentum and energy. If two daughter nucleons are produced the kinetic >energy is carried away by the daughter nucleons. The momentum is balanced by >the angle in which the daughter nucleons shoot away. If a single daughter >nucleon is produced like helium four, it is quite impossible for the reaction to >conserve both momentum and energy. The result is the excess Q is carried away >by an energetic photon. You obviously haven't read the previous post I referred to. The result of the reaction is two helium nuclei, which go in opposite directions, thus conserving both energy and momentum, with some of each possibly shared by a couple of electrons. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk If "other people" can be denied their rights, then what's to stop someone claiming that you belong among the "other people"? From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 29 19:24:19 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2U3OFCg024363; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 19:24:15 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2U3OEuE024345; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 19:24:14 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 19:24:14 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f From: Robin van Spaandonk To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: The myth of lattice coupling Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 13:24:09 +1000 Organization: Improving Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ultra6.eskimo.com id i2U3O7Cg024311 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53838 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: In reply to FZNIDARSIC aol.com's message of Mon, 29 Mar 2004 08:32:06 -0500 (EST): Hi Frank, [snip] >In a message dated 3/28/2004 11:46:05 PM Eastern Standard Time, >rvanspaa bigpond.net.au writes: > >> a strong indication BTW that it depends upon De Broglie wave coupling), > >I thought of this also. It does not fit with the facts. The debrogle >wavelength is longer with colder system. The positive temperature coefficient of >cold fusion does not bode well for the deBrogle path. Actually I agree, at least at first glance. You may recall that a couple of years ago I suggested the certain lattice types might be more effective, (specifically lattices in which a given atom only has two nearest neighbours). My thought at the time was that perhaps as the temperature approached the temperature of a phase transition in the material a condensation of phonons would take place, specifically that only the highest energy (and frequency) phonons would exist in the lattice (with a wavelength equal to the nearest neighbour distance). However I was disavowed of this notion by a prof. from Cornell, though I have never quite let it go. ;) OTOH, there may be more than one CF mechanism, and perhaps not all improve with temperature. E.g. mechanisms based upon hydrino production likely would improve with temp. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk If "other people" can be denied their rights, then what's to stop someone claiming that you belong among the "other people"? From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 29 22:08:29 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2U68FrT000515; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 22:08:15 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2U68Bf4000480; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 22:08:11 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 22:08:11 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f From: Robin van Spaandonk To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Asteroid flyby tonight Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 16:08:05 +1000 Organization: Improving Message-ID: <1t1i60ld8ttkcs8ju00bnvqhoeckorjeup 4ax.com> References: In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ultra5.eskimo.com id i2U687rT000437 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53839 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Sun, 28 Mar 2004 21:21:47 -0900: Hi, [snip] >At 3:03 PM 3/29/4, Robin van Spaandonk wrote: > >>The solar system oscillates up and own above the plane of the ecliptic of >>the galaxy. The greatest matter density in the galaxy occurs in the plane >>of the ecliptic, hence this plane is a likely incarnation of Horace's >>"Nemesis cloud". > > >The "Nemesis cloud" concept is definitely not mine. Not sure whose it is. That's ok, I just meant to refer to the same concept you were referring to. Just establishing a frame of reference. >However I added a few obvious notions to the concept that may be but >probably are not original, like the fact the Nemesis star need not ever >return for the process to continue on unabated in the natural period of Ort >cloud, or more likely objects in a cloud well beyond the Ort cloud. > > >>AFAIK we are due to pass through the centre of the plane of the ecliptic >>again on 21 Dec. 2012, so as we approach that date, one might well expect >>the frequency of close approaches to increase. >> >>Does anyone know the frequency of the oscillation? > > >The above may be a misnomer. The ecliptic is the plane of the earth's >orbit around the sun, which therefore also happens to be the apparent path >of the sun around the earth against the background of the celestial sphere. >It is called the ecliptic because it is the plane in which eclipses occur. >The earth is always in the ecliptic. I believe that on 21 Dec. 2012 the sun will lie on a straight line with the Earth and the centre of the galaxy. I assumed that the plane of the solar system was parallel with that of the galaxy. However upon checking a star chart program, I now see that it isn't so, so it seems I was wrong about passing through the plane of the galaxy. Here is the site that got me started. :( Regards, Robin van Spaandonk If "other people" can be denied their rights, then what's to stop someone claiming that you belong among the "other people"? From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 29 22:19:55 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2U6JlrT003576; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 22:19:47 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2U6JjHq003559; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 22:19:45 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 22:19:45 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f From: Robin van Spaandonk To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Asteroid flyby tonight Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 16:19:44 +1000 Organization: Improving Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ultra5.eskimo.com id i2U6JgrT003517 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53840 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Sun, 28 Mar 2004 22:39:41 -0900: Hi, [snip] >The main problem with this theory is the lack of extinctions in the >Pre-Cambian period. That fact leads me to believe a one time perterbation I suspect there was much if any life in the Pre-Cambrian to become extinct. >about 600 million years ago must have started the process. It may be >possible we got gravitationally entangled with a partner Nemesis rock or >cloud that orbits at the same galactic radius but always occupies >approximately the opposing galactic latitude. > >Regards, > >Horace Heffner > Regards, Robin van Spaandonk If "other people" can be denied their rights, then what's to stop someone claiming that you belong among the "other people"? From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 29 23:43:24 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2U7hJsd018414; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 23:43:19 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2U7hH7a018394; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 23:43:17 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 23:43:17 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 22:49:33 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: hidden Mazatzal pieces Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53841 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 12:28 PM 3/29/4, SnowDog wrote: >I'm confused. If you look at the first two images I've put together on this >page, you'll see a bright object at the bottom of the second image, that's >part of the Rover. This object is so bright that it's preventing any >adjustment to the blue and green images, and is allowing the image to come >out fairly well color-balanced, although it's a bit dark. The first image is >so out of balance that it has very little red. The PanCam is adjusted to >provide well-balanced exposure times for good color in white light. Hence, >we get good color when we find pictures with shiny objects in them. > >Compare the first two pictures on this page. They are the same picture, >taken just 20 minutes apart. Notice the shiny object at the bottom of the >second image. > >http://216.169.108.12/golddirectory/mars/mars4.htm > >Craig The top photo has the rover's white JPL text in it, so should have not been a problem, at least not a problem due to the digital image processing. The image processing should be OK provided there is even a spec of white. It appears to me that the top photo was overexposed. The bottom photo was not overexposed, due to both the white JPL sign and mostly the large area of brushed metal. Note that when the dark one is lightened or the light one darkened there is lots of blue in both. None of this helps with the original problem though, which is determining the color of the ice/rock. It simply looks like there is a lot of blue in there, in part due to the even gradation of colors in the photos with the two high end filters. Could be wrong too, so I agree the only way to be sure is to wait for properly corrected color. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Mon Mar 29 23:43:31 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2U7hMX0011428; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 23:43:22 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2U7hFRN011399; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 23:43:15 -0800 Resent-Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 23:43:15 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 22:49:36 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: hidden Mazatzal pieces Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53842 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 12:49 PM 3/29/4, SnowDog wrote: >I can't find too much from here at the office, but this is essentially it. >There are numerous discussions about this on the web. In one discussion, the >group found a NASA specialist who said that the adjustment data would not be >available for several months. I also found something, somewhere, which >offered an explanation for this algorithm. It apparently improves their >compression performance. However, this is all I can find at the moment. > >Here's the key: > >"(4) rudimentary automatic exposure control capability to maximize the SNR >of downlinked data while preventing data saturation." Interesting. The term "exposure control" means to me controlling aperture or exposure time, physically. This was discussed within the framework of digital image processing, but it appears to me this actually means there is a light integrator based exposure time control. Ths must be what "rudimentary exposure control" meant in the discussion. This would account for the glare in some overexposures, which is due to small bright spots, as opposed to large bright areas. [snip bunch of good stuff] Thanks much for taking the time to post (and repost) this stuff. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 30 00:19:08 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2U8IxRZ025871; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 00:19:00 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2U8IwSN025858; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 00:18:58 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 00:18:58 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 02:20:19 -0600 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: thomas malloy Subject: Re: Asteroid flyby tonight Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-DCC-CPI-Metrics: Clear 1161; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 Resent-Message-ID: <3IXp6B.A.0TG.y1SaAB ultra5.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53843 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: > > >Perhaps Thomas was referring to the angle with relation to the Earth's >>orbit around the Sun? If it approached in the plane of the ecliptic, in a >>retrograde orbit, then you can add the velocity of the Earth (~30 km/sec) >>to that of the meteor, which makes for a much bigger splash. > > >Thomas would have to answer the question in regard to his intended meaning. >However, the term "angle of incidence" that I used prior to his question I >think clearly meant angle of incidence with respect to the earth's surface, >which is completely independent of the mutual angle of the intersecting >orbits. > >Yes, a retrograde orbit would provide somewhat larger maximum possible >energy than a 90 degree mutual angle, but such an event is very unlikely >unless the source of the impacting body is a Nemesis cloud. Retrograde >orbit objects with orbits in the ecliptic are fairly rare. > >Regards, > >Horace Heffner I was just wondering if the asteroid coming in at an angle would discipate some of the energy in the air. What it does is spread the energy over a larger area. with sufficient energy to char everything under it. I had assumed that most of the energy release would be on impact, but a significant amount of the energy would be released by the friction with the atmosphere. It amazes me that a glowing chunk of rock would liberate enough energy to ignite material at a distance of miles. This discussion reminds me of one that Hugh Hewitt was having monday evening with a physicist who had called the show. Hewitt questioned the caller about the maximium rate of speed that an astriod could have, he said 25,000 mph. The question had to do with John Kerey's descent, and which was falling faster, a lead slug or an astroid I want to thank all of you for a most interesting discussion. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 30 01:33:31 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2U9XMkD005606; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 01:33:22 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2U9XLSr005591; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 01:33:21 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 01:33:21 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f From: "explorecraft" To: Subject: RE: Asteroid flyby tonight Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 16:31:38 +0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - lester.switchfusion.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - eskimo.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - explorecraft.com Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53844 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Ditto, Pre-Cambian life-forms were not conducive to fossilization, we wouldn't necessarily know what to look for. On the other hand, I wonder if someone has done a iridium-specific examination of Pre-Cambian lithology. If I find anything, I'll let you know, but I presume there is no such data - it would be too uneconomic I think. I will give it a look-see, anyway. > -----Original Message----- > From: Robin van Spaandonk [mailto:rvanspaa bigpond.net.au] > Sent: Tuesday, 2004 March 30 13:20 > To: vortex-l eskimo.com > Subject: Re: Asteroid flyby tonight > > > In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Sun, 28 Mar 2004 22:39:41 -0900: > Hi, > [snip] > > >The main problem with this theory is the lack of extinctions in the > >Pre-Cambian period. That fact leads me to believe a one time > perterbation > > I suspect there was much if any life in the Pre-Cambrian to > become extinct. > > >about 600 million years ago must have started the process. It may be > >possible we got gravitationally entangled with a partner Nemesis rock or > >cloud that orbits at the same galactic radius but always occupies > >approximately the opposing galactic latitude. > > > >Regards, > > > >Horace Heffner > > > > Regards, > > Robin van Spaandonk > > If "other people" can be denied their rights, then what's > to stop someone claiming that you belong among the "other people"? > > > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 30 03:52:06 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2UBq1kD002393; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 03:52:01 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2UBpucZ002371; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 03:51:57 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 03:51:57 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <009101c4164d$6a67fff0$6401a8c0 Craig> From: "SnowDog" To: References: Subject: Re: hidden Mazatzal pieces Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 05:52:02 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53845 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: > Note that when the dark one is lightened or the light one darkened there is > lots of blue in both. I guess we just disagree. I did increase the brightness and the contrast in the second image, and put it here, as the third image. http://www.golddirectory.com/mars/mars.htm To me, it looks like a good color photograph with no blue. > None of this helps with the original problem though, which is determining > the color of the ice/rock. It simply looks like there is a lot of blue in > there, in part due to the even gradation of colors in the photos with the > two high end filters. Could be wrong too, so I agree the only way to be > sure is to wait for properly corrected color. You make a good point here. If there are SINGLE step gradations in the brightness of the image, then wouldn't that indicate that the image hasn't been adjusted very much, since a large adjustment should cause the numerical values to skip? If the highest value in an image is 64, and this is forced to 255, then the next value at 63 would be stepped up to 252. I think there might be something to this idea, but remember that the PanCam uses a 12-bit pixel, not an 8-bit pixel, and this would make such a type of analysis harder. Otherwise, it might be possible to analyze the skip values in an image to determine the adjustment applied. I greatly appreciate the fact that NASA is streaming these images straight to the website, but this one value along with each image, would solve all of our color problems, (as long as we're balancing for white light). The only way I know to find good color in a Mars image is to compare the sky color, if the image has a piece of the sky in it. The color wheel has two mirrors on it which reflect the sky. I can average each color-pixel value from the color wheel and determine the color of the sky to a high degree of accuracy. The last picture on this page displays an image of Bonneville Crater adjusted in this way. http://www.golddirectory.com/mars/mars.htm Craig From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 30 04:01:44 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2UC1bkD004442; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 04:01:38 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2UC1ag9004426; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 04:01:36 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 04:01:36 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <00a101c4164e$c31e0080$6401a8c0 Craig> From: "SnowDog" To: References: <009101c4164d$6a67fff0$6401a8c0@Craig> Subject: Re: hidden Mazatzal pieces Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 06:01:40 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53846 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: > You make a good point here. If there are SINGLE step gradations in the > brightness of the image, then wouldn't that indicate that the image hasn't > been adjusted very much, since a large adjustment should cause the numerical > values to skip? If the highest value in an image is 64, and this is forced > to 255, then the next value at 63 would be stepped up to 252. I think there > might be something to this idea, but remember that the PanCam uses a 12-bit > pixel, not an 8-bit pixel, and this would make such a type of analysis > harder. Otherwise, it might be possible to analyze the skip values in an > image to determine the adjustment applied. I greatly appreciate the fact > that NASA is streaming these images straight to the website, but this one > value along with each image, would solve all of our color problems, (as long > as we're balancing for white light). I withdraw this idea. If it is exposure control that the PanCam employs to saturate these images, then there will be no skips in the gradations. Craig From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 30 07:13:12 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2UFD5EU004419; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 07:13:05 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2UFD2fZ004393; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 07:13:02 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 07:13:02 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <005401c41669$51a40f60$8837fea9 cpq> From: "Jones Beene" To: References: <011901c415d6$6d120a60$8837fea9 cpq> Subject: Re: Shades of Strangelove Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 07:11:46 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ultra6.eskimo.com id i2UFCwEU004246 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53847 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Rick Monteverde writes, > "Only a madman..." > "An effective ABM system would supposedly render the doomsday scenario at the end of the move "Dr. Strangelove" (MAD) less effective as a deterrent, thus making nuclear war more likely. " Well, at the risk of sounding picky... if we assume that in the movie, following Major Kong's infamous ride, that the Doomsday machine operated and achieved its intended purpose, then there is really nothing that could possibly diminish that kind of deterrent, is there? Otherwise one would have to assume that the USA, because it developed a foolproof ABM, would nevertheless stage a sneak preemptive attack and risk the total demise of civilization, based on the off-chance that the Doomsday machine would malfunction (presumably it is located in the heart of Russia, and you can never really be sure that there is only one of them)... However, you did preface the post with "Only a madman..." and maybe Dr. Rumsfeld's oops... Strangelove's... uncontrollable, homicidal hand reaches even beyond the feeble restraint of those higher-up... This might be of interest: http://slate.msn.com/id/2082846/ Jones From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 30 07:23:51 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2UFNhkD016067; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 07:23:44 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2UFNeaq016043; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 07:23:40 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 07:23:40 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 06:29:36 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: Asteroid flyby tonight Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53848 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 2:20 AM 3/30/4, thomas malloy wrote: >I was just wondering if the asteroid coming in at an angle would >discipate some of the energy in the air. What it does is spread the >energy over a larger area. with sufficient energy to char everything >under it. I had assumed that most of the energy release would be on >impact, but a significant amount of the energy would be released by >the friction with the atmosphere. It amazes me that a glowing chunk >of rock would liberate enough energy to ignite material at a distance >of miles. Tunguska apparently dissipated all its energy in air, but it was probably made of ice and not rock, and would have had to fragment into very small pieces to dump 10 megatons TNT energy into the air. Comets are thought to be loosly held together. It would be such loosly aggregated comets, made of sand and dust and ice, that would dump a lot of energy in the air vs the ground. > >This discussion reminds me of one that Hugh Hewitt was having monday >evening with a physicist who had called the show. Hewitt questioned >the caller about the maximium rate of speed that an astriod could >have, he said 25,000 mph. The question had to do with John Kerey's >descent, and which was falling faster, a lead slug or an astroid The max is actually a LOT faster than 25,000 mph, which is rooughly earth's escape velocity. A comet at our radius from the sun could be carrying close to escape velocity from the sun at our radius, Ve = sqr(2*G*m/r) = sqr(2*G*(1.979E30 kg)/(93E6 mi)) = 42 km/s. If it comes in on a retrograde orbit just right we add the earth's solar orbit velocity, 2*Pi*(93E6 Mi)/yr = 29.8 km/s, plus earth's escape velocity or about 11.18 km/s, for a total of 82.3 km/s, or 184,000 mph. A body coming in from outside the solar system would have no such limit to its speed. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 30 08:02:09 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2UG1SkD025047; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 08:01:28 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2UG1P2s025017; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 08:01:25 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 08:01:25 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <006101c41670$089ef580$8837fea9 cpq> From: "Jones Beene" To: References: <1d6.1d861a0f.2d99f5b7 aol.com> Subject: Re: The myth of lattice coupling Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 07:59:50 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ultra5.eskimo.com id i2UG1IkD024975 Resent-Message-ID: <-lolk.A.0GG.VnZaAB ultra5.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53849 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: ----- Original Message ----- From: Frank, > How about the one dimensional lowering of the Coulombic potential wall? You might be interested to know that in a number of "extra-dimensional theories", including some "string" theories - anything above three dimensions begins to immediately "enfold" back into the first dimension. An effective visual analogy would be the topographical surface of the torus - the type of torus whose center hole has shrunk to 1-space, that is to say, the minor-diameter equals the major radius. In this analogy, all three dimensions emerge from that one-space and continue to expand through 3-space untill they reach the farthest tangent away from the major focus (which is the last fractal of 3-space), then everything on the "return" path, whether it be labeled as 4-space or 10 "enfolded" dimensions - or whatever, they all exist on the return path and enfold back into the one-space starting point. Consequently, if you hear of a string theory (one of the best is "M-theory") with 10 dimensions, then in one understanding of this, all the "extra" dimensions can be linguistically said to be encompassed as "4-space" and all will emerge back through 1-space. In our everyday world, this circuit may even happen sequentially in plank-time but we are unaware as our senses only take in 2 and 3-space. I'm sure that this clarification is about as "clear as mud" but that is the best I can do after roughly 40 years of contemplation, or was that omphaloskepsis .... ;-) Jones Matter of fact, I wonder if this visual type of toroid topology was ever the inspiration for the vernacular : "contemplating one's navel" ? Probably depends on the size of the surrounding "tire" so-to-speak... From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 30 09:27:23 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2UHREGu015688; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 09:27:15 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2UHRAZj015657; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 09:27:10 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 09:27:10 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <002d01c41673$c8523f60$8781b341 computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: Subject: Re: Carbon-Neutral, Charcoal-Fired Sterling Engines Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 10:26:37 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-ELNK-Trace: 0b1c9d71006e06a171639b933de7ae6f7e972de0d01da940d32bee676f32818c62f707e7c1df9c4f350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53850 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Biomass Charcoal from about any source can be exothermally/cleanly produced by the megaton. Pelletizing it into "fuel cartridges" that can be stoker-fed into the combustion side of Sterling Engines on vehicles could appreciably lower the buildup of atmospheric CO2. Regards, Frederick From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 30 09:47:08 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2UHl20f012247; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 09:47:03 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2UHkx5L012219; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 09:46:59 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 09:46:59 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-Id: <6.0.3.0.2.20040330123125.01ce3028 pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jedrothwell mindspring.com@pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.3.0 Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 12:46:57 -0500 To: vortex-L eskimo.com From: Jed Rothwell Subject: Re: Carbon-Neutral, Charcoal-Fired Sterling Engines Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53851 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Frederick Sparber writes: > Biomass Charcoal from about any source can be exothermally/cleanly produced by the > megaton. BUT, as Pimentel & Pimentel showed, the entire mass of annual new growth biomass in North America would not be enough to satisfy our energy requirements. We would have to include old-growth biomass. After some decades we would convert the continent into a desert. This is what is happening in many parts of the Third World, particularly in Haiti. It is happening in slow motion in North America because our method of growing corn is destroys the land and water table. Millions of tons of our corn crop is converted to ethanol, in a process that causes massive, uncontrolled pollution and that uses up roughly 70 percent more energy from conventional fuel than it creates. To a man from Mars I suppose this would look like society-wide lunacy and the biggest waste of materials and human labor since the pyramid builders of ancient Egypt. That foolish Martian! He wouldn't "get" our "pork barrel" politics. - Jed From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 30 09:56:47 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2UHuagb014788; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 09:56:37 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2UHuW7C014766; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 09:56:32 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 09:56:32 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <003b01c41677$e8f97b80$8781b341 computer> From: "Frederick Sparber" To: References: <6.0.3.0.2.20040330123125.01ce3028 pop.mindspring.com> Subject: Re: Carbon-Neutral, Charcoal-Fired Sterling Engines Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 10:56:05 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-ELNK-Trace: 0b1c9d71006e06a171639b933de7ae6f7e972de0d01da94064983816c64df8d28d7427204a833c40350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53852 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jed Rothwell" To: Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 11:46 AM Subject: Re: Carbon-Neutral, Charcoal-Fired Sterling Engines Not ALL of the energy needs, Jed. But 2 Billion Bushels of the Genetically Modified corn produced last year would be a good start. http://www.cornburner.com/ " "I farm for a living and I know how to grow corn, but I can't seem to figure how to grow propane!!" " ... John Jensen, South Dakota Corn makes a good charcoal pellet binder too. :-) Frederick > Frederick Sparber writes: > > > Biomass Charcoal from about any source can be exothermally/cleanly > produced by the > > megaton. > > BUT, as Pimentel & Pimentel showed, the entire mass of annual new growth > biomass in North America would not be enough to satisfy our energy > requirements. We would have to include old-growth biomass. After some > decades we would convert the continent into a desert. This is what is > happening in many parts of the Third World, particularly in Haiti. It is > happening in slow motion in North America because our method of growing > corn is destroys the land and water table. > > Millions of tons of our corn crop is converted to ethanol, in a process > that causes massive, uncontrolled pollution and that uses up roughly 70 > percent more energy from conventional fuel than it creates. To a man from > Mars I suppose this would look like society-wide lunacy and the biggest > waste of materials and human labor since the pyramid builders of ancient > Egypt. That foolish Martian! He wouldn't "get" our "pork barrel" politics. > > - Jed > > From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 30 10:18:49 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2UIIjgb020269; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 10:18:46 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2UIIhGQ020256; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 10:18:43 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 10:18:43 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f From: FZNIDARSIC aol.com Message-ID: <1d7.1d634436.2d9b1409 aol.com> Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 13:18:49 EST Subject: Re: The myth of lattice coupling To: vortex-l eskimo.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_1d7.1d634436.2d9b1409_boundary" X-Mailer: 8.0 for Windows sub 6800 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53853 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: --part1_1d7.1d634436.2d9b1409_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 3/30/2004 11:03:19 AM Eastern Standard Time, jonesb9 pacbell.net writes: > You might be interested to know that in a number of "extra-dimensional > theories", including some "string" theories - anything above three dimensions > begins to immediately "enfold" back into the first dimension. > These extra dimensions open at very high energy. The energy levels of cold fusion are less than one eV. This requires a rather ordinary classical approach. Going to work on long shifts night turn tonight. Will probable not be doing much else. Frank Z --part1_1d7.1d634436.2d9b1409_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In a message dated 3/30/2004 11:03:= 19 AM Eastern Standard Time, jonesb9 pacbell.net writes:

You might be interested to know= that in a number of "extra-dimensional theories", including some "string" t= heories - anything above three dimensions begins to immediately "enfold" bac= k into the first dimension.


These extra dimensions open at very high energy.  The energy levels of=20= cold fusion are less than one eV.  This requires a rather ordinary clas= sical approach.

Going to work on long shifts night turn tonight.  Will probable not be=20= doing much else.

Frank Z
--part1_1d7.1d634436.2d9b1409_boundary-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 30 12:05:50 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2UK5U61028560; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 12:05:31 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2UK5Nx9028522; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 12:05:23 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 12:05:23 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f From: "explorecraft" To: Subject: RE: Carbon-Neutral, Charcoal-Fired Sterling Engines Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 03:03:03 +0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <6.0.3.0.2.20040330123125.01ce3028 pop.mindspring.com> X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - lester.switchfusion.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - eskimo.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - explorecraft.com Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53854 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: > -----Original Message----- > From: Jed Rothwell [mailto:JedRothwell mindspring.com] > Sent: Wednesday, 2004 March 31 00:47 > To: vortex-L eskimo.com > Subject: Re: Carbon-Neutral, Charcoal-Fired Sterling Engines > >...X...< > > percent more energy from conventional fuel than it creates. To a man from > Mars I suppose this would look like society-wide lunacy and the biggest > waste of materials and human labor since the pyramid builders of ancient > Egypt. That foolish Martian! He wouldn't "get" our "pork barrel" politics. > > - Jed yeah but look what they did to Mars ! From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 30 12:58:16 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2UKw161011954; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 12:58:02 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2UKvu7b011912; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 12:57:56 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 12:57:56 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net (Unverified) Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 12:03:48 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: hidden Mazatzal pieces Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53855 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: At 5:52 AM 3/30/4, SnowDog wrote: >> Note that when the dark one is lightened or the light one darkened there >is >> lots of blue in both. > >I guess we just disagree. I did increase the brightness and the contrast in >the second image, and put it here, as the third image. > >http://www.golddirectory.com/mars/mars.htm > >To me, it looks like a good color photograph with no blue. At 6:01 AM 3/30/4, SnowDog wrote: >> You make a good point here. If there are SINGLE step gradations in the >> brightness of the image, then wouldn't that indicate that the image hasn't >> been adjusted very much, since a large adjustment should cause the >numerical >> values to skip? If the highest value in an image is 64, and this is forced >> to 255, then the next value at 63 would be stepped up to 252. I think >there >> might be something to this idea, but remember that the PanCam uses a >12-bit >> pixel, not an 8-bit pixel, and this would make such a type of analysis >> harder. Otherwise, it might be possible to analyze the skip values in an >> image to determine the adjustment applied. I greatly appreciate the fact >> that NASA is streaming these images straight to the website, but this one >> value along with each image, would solve all of our color problems, (as >long >> as we're balancing for white light). > >I withdraw this idea. If it is exposure control that the PanCam employs to >saturate these images, then there will be no skips in the gradations. > >Craig Yes, I too felt the above was correct until I got the impression that there is true physical exposure control, which throws the certainlty of anything out, at least theoretically. There are no guarantees one way or another without calibration data. I think we have a high degree of agreement on this. However, I still feel like the Mazatzal images using filters are not all that far different in many places compared to the non-filtered navcam and microscopic images. Further, filters simply aren't perfect. I still can't help but feel like there is a lot of blue in the images. To check things out I ran a histogram against your dark image of soil that includes a metallic portion of Spirit. Here is a simple summary of the results (max possible intensity value is 255): .......Mean........Std Dev.....Median Red 53.5 36.6 49.0 Green 44.6 36.4 38.0 Blue 39.5 36.6 31.0 If you look at the histogram summary data you can see that the distributions are strikingly similar in shape and magnitude, but with green and blue shifted a bit to the left (lower occurance). The histogram shows, by color, the frequency of a given intensity. You can see that the 3 basic colors are not all that different in intensity. I realize here that photo *appearances* are quite different from the similarity indicated in the numbers. However, my point is that, assuming the dark photo is even just roughly correct, there is a lot of blue in the background, so even though there may be real exposure control, there is in this case a severe limit to how dramatically it can affect the results for blue, especially bright blue spots. If Mazatzal is even roughly similar, then areas which are black in the warm filters and white in the cool filters are likely in reality to be somewhat blue. There are no guarantees, and the ice notion is certainly only a speculation, but this is just a rough assessment, how things feel at the moment. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 30 15:01:01 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2UN0rle014366; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 15:00:54 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2UN0pG4014341; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 15:00:51 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 15:00:51 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 14:07:03 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Re: hidden Mazatzal pieces Resent-Message-ID: <8nulBC.A.BgD.iwfaAB ultra5.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53856 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Nice pieced together 2 meg image of grind showing bubbles etc.: NASA ground way beyond this point, so it will be interesting to see the next photos. Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 30 15:19:28 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2UNJJle019155; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 15:19:19 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2UNJInL019145; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 15:19:18 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 15:19:18 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: rick+highsurf.com mail.highsurf.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <005401c41669$51a40f60$8837fea9 cpq> References: <011901c415d6$6d120a60$8837fea9 cpq> <005401c41669$51a40f60$8837fea9 cpq> Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 13:19:06 -1000 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Rick Monteverde Subject: Re: Shades of Strangelove Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ultra5.eskimo.com id i2UNJFle019122 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53857 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Jones - At 7:11 AM -0800 3/30/04, Jones Beene wrote: >presumably it is located in the heart of Russia, and you can never really be sure that there is only one of them The 'doomsday machine' actually does exist in reality, it's not just an imaginary device in a movie: it is the mutual assured destruction that would occur as policy if somebody launches. "Only a madman" would launch. We now have madmen who would probably launch if they had 'em. One tried to get them but we and the UN stopped him. And there are others still to deal with - MAD seems obsolete. So where does this put us in terms of someone developing a good ABM system, or something that can reliably defeat that defense? Maybe Tesla was right in 1919. Can the 'ultimate defense' really win the peace? I hope so, because the alternative looks increasingly grim. - R. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 30 16:30:55 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2V0Unle005265; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 16:30:49 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2V0Ulpn005242; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 16:30:47 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 16:30:47 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f From: Josh8103579212 aol.com Message-ID: <6b.25b48a0b.2d9b6b20 aol.com> Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 19:30:24 EST Subject: POSSIBLE INTEREST Will see To: greenglow yahoogroups.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1080693024" X-Mailer: 9.0 for Windows sub 5106 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53858 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: -------------------------------1080693024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 3/30/2004 12:23:38 AM Eastern Standard Time, -----hu fastmail.fm writes: Hello, I am located in Hong Kong. My phone is +852 9458-deleted. I am very interested in your product, and wish to market it in China. Please provide as much info as you can. Regards, James deleted Hong Kong / China Reply He has seen the video's because he sent the mail through the web site. Visionary business types. Are my type of people. Not small minded types that cannot see past their nose and grasp opportunity. When i first seen the conversion Tech. 4 years ago I did not care how it functioned. I only cared if it did. And if the premise presented an opportunity. China I have came to know has a great deal of dirty electrical power that damages EQ. The Electrical phase conversion device loves dirty power. And can eliminate the aspects that cause damage. Just that ability of the converter is worth. Who knows? Very few can begin to imagine at that level. -------------------------------1080693024 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In a message dated 3/30/2004 12:23:38 AM Eastern Standard Time, -----hu@f= astmail.fm writes:
Hello,
 
I am located in Hong Kong. My phone is +852= 9458-deleted. I am very interested in your product, and wish to market it i= n China. Please provide as much info as you can.
 
Regards,
James deleted
Hong Kong / China
    Reply   He has seen the video's because he= sent the mail through the web site. Visionary business types. Are my type o= f people. Not small minded types that cannot see past their nose and grasp&n= bsp;opportunity. When i first seen the conversion Tech. 4 years ago  I=20= did not care how it functioned. I only cared if it did.  And if the pre= mise presented an opportunity. 
 
China I have came to know has a great deal of dirty electrical power th= at damages EQ. The Electrical phase conversion device  loves dirty= power. And can eliminate the aspects that cause damage.  Just that abi= lity of the converter is worth. Who knows?  Very few can begin to imagi= ne at that level.
-------------------------------1080693024-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 30 17:01:46 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2V11dle014475; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 17:01:39 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2V11cBN014461; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 17:01:38 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 17:01:38 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f From: Robin van Spaandonk To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Shades of Strangelove Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 11:01:34 +1000 Organization: Improving Message-ID: <816k609krtbmrl3dpe5c30smg1r094j9bl 4ax.com> References: <011901c415d6$6d120a60$8837fea9 cpq> <005401c41669$51a40f60$8837fea9@cpq> In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ultra5.eskimo.com id i2V11Yle014420 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53859 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: In reply to Rick Monteverde's message of Tue, 30 Mar 2004 13:19:06 -1000: Hi, [snip] >The 'doomsday machine' actually does exist in reality, it's not just an imaginary device in a movie: it is the mutual assured destruction that would occur as policy if somebody launches. "Only a madman" would launch. We now have madmen who would probably launch if they had 'em. [snip] Actually I'm much more afraid of the madmen in the current administration that already have em. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk If "other people" can be denied their rights, then what's to stop someone claiming that you belong among the "other people"? From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 30 17:29:35 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2V1TPle021093; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 17:29:25 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2V1TNdQ021072; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 17:29:23 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 17:29:23 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <006701c416bf$658e3680$8837fea9 cpq> From: "Jones Beene" To: References: <011901c415d6$6d120a60$8837fea9 cpq> <005401c41669$51a40f60$8837fea9@cpq> Subject: Re: Shades of Strangelove Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 17:27:56 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ultra5.eskimo.com id i2V1TKle021042 Resent-Message-ID: <2P5Q7B.A.MJF.z7haAB ultra5.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53860 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Rick, > The 'doomsday machine' actually does exist in reality, it's not just an imaginary device in a movie... Yes, I understood where you were going with that... but whenever Dr. Strangelove is mentioned... well, it just induces a certain insane frivolity... juxtaposed against absolute fear and loathing. As a result, serious but outrageous alternative perspectives will often emerge about the mentality of the 'other side.' For instance, here is a twist to the post cold-war planners logic that you may never have considered. From the perspective of planners in war-rooms, our (mostly paranoid) military bureaucracy (part of the job description), have probably concocted all kinds of continuing semi-plausible but warped spy-vs-spy reasoning to justify their paranoia (and continued employment): so now as they must see the Russians as basically a third world country (only because the truth of their economic failure cannot be disguised any further), they promptly overlook that plight as being a good thing for our security, and instead reason that the relative poverty should not have given them any logical motivation to try to match us tit-for-tat in a high tech arms race that they obviously cannot win. They know that if a poor country was really desirous of the maximum deterrent for a ridiculously low cost, then a Doomsday machine like Strangelove's (real name: Murkewerkdichliebe, or "beloved fate" in German - to appreciate the humor you have to try to pronounce it) is the only way to go. Save the billions and feed the babushkas. ERGO, since the Russians haven't gone the low-cost Doomsday route, they must be secretly planning something devious! and they must be stopped! That kind of Nazi-bred technorationalism (originally both a satire on Werner Von Braun and Henry Kissinger) has not gone away in recent years, if anything it has gotten more fine-tuned. Jones I still break into uncontrollable laughter thinking about when President Muffley, who bears a resemblance to you-know-who, tries to breakup a scuffle between General Turgidson and the Russian Ambassador, "Gentlemen, there is no fighting in the War Room!" .... From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 30 20:50:27 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2V4oMWO022432; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 20:50:22 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2V4oGqW022404; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 20:50:16 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 20:50:16 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: rick+highsurf.com mail.highsurf.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <006701c416bf$658e3680$8837fea9 cpq> References: <011901c415d6$6d120a60$8837fea9 cpq> <005401c41669$51a40f60$8837fea9 cpq> <006701c416bf$658e3680$8837fea9 cpq> Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 18:50:00 -1000 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Rick Monteverde Subject: Re: Shades of Strangelove Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ultra6.eskimo.com id i2V4nqWO022333 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53861 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Jones - > they must be secretly planning something devious! and they must be stopped! I've probably misunderstood you again. Are you actually suggesting that it's "paranoid" or ridiculous to think that above? Of *course* they're actually planning Something Devious, and they must indeed be stopped or countered! They have thousands of brilliant people whose job it is to come up with Something Devious as well as counter the other guy's plans, and so do we. Especially when they just came out and publicly announced the successful test of a New Offensive Hypersonic Something Devious which counters our Defensive Previous Something Devious? If somebody has an actual workable plan for derailing this insane mess, speak up please. Me and few billion other people would like to know about it. We need more than a rule against fighting in the War Room. For instance, how about those phunny lights in the sky that make the "giants fade". Now THAT sounds like a good start! ;) - R. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Tue Mar 30 23:06:05 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2V75wGY001873; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 23:05:58 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2V75qqM001848; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 23:05:52 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 23:05:52 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Mailer: Ultrafunk Popcorn release 1.47 (30-July-2003) X-URL: http://www.ultrafunk.com/products/popcorn/ X-Priority: 3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 09:24:23 +0200 From: Michael Huffman To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Shades of Strangelove Reply-To: knuke sumosound.de Message-Id: X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse kundenserver.de auth:b76291440de0a671bf17bfec730be47d Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53862 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Ahoy Rick! >If somebody has an actual workable plan for derailing this insane mess, speak up please. Me and few billion other people would like to know about it. We need more than a rule against fighting in the War Room. For instance, how about those phunny lights in the sky that make the "giants fade". Now THAT sounds like a good start! ;) > >- R. My long-standing, Ultimate Solution to the insanity that we have grown up in, and continue to be confronted with even in this age, is to develop some kind of bomb or beam or spray or something that, when deployed, brings a large group of people in a given targeted area to the immediate and uncontrollable state of a physical, sexual orgasm. You can meditate on the effects and ramifications of such a "weapon". This, in my opinion, is one of the few things worthy of Manhattan Project style funding levels, and I KNOW that it would work (in the weirdest of ways, of course). Knuke - The Ultimate Devious Guy I am still as serious as a [fill in the blank]. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Mar 31 04:07:55 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2VC7fF8022454; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 04:07:41 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2VC7SEx022400; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 04:07:28 -0800 Resent-Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 04:07:28 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: rick+highsurf.com mail.highsurf.com Message-Id: Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 02:07:14 -1000 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Rick Monteverde Subject: I'm likin' these lichens... Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53863 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Wow. http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/m/065/1M133955470EFF08AQP2936M2M1.JPG There's some large dark structures on the upper left that actually look like retracted anenomes. Big matchsticks, worms, strings of spheres everywhere. - R. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Mar 31 04:08:43 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2VC8cF8022738; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 04:08:38 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2VC8cbZ022720; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 04:08:38 -0800 Resent-Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 04:08:38 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: rick+highsurf.com mail.highsurf.com Message-Id: Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 02:08:52 -1000 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Rick Monteverde Subject: I'm likin' these lichens... Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53864 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: >Wow. >http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/m/065/1M133955470EFF08AQP2936M2M1.JPG >There's some large dark structures on the upper left - er, make that lower left. - R. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Mar 31 06:54:37 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2VEsVF8003243; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 06:54:31 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2VEsSqT003219; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 06:54:28 -0800 Resent-Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 06:54:28 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <002401c41730$122d8a60$7b5accd1 MIKEBY3NR533HT> From: "Mike Carrell" To: References: <011901c415d6$6d120a60$8837fea9 cpq> <005401c41669$51a40f60$8837fea9@cpq> <006701c416bf$658e3680$8837fea9@cpq> Subject: Re: Shades of Strangelove Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 09:53:26 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53865 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: During the cold war, the possibility that a deranged individual on either side could initiate an unauthorized launch was carefully considered. The US Minuteman lauch control rooms were manned by two men, physically separated, the controls arranged so that cooperation was necessary to initate a launch, and both armed so the other could be killed if going awry. The US safety procedures were published in a journal, and in diplomatic contacts at parties, etc. around the world, the word was passed to the Soviets to look at that particular article. The US wanted the Soviets to a) be assured of our restraint, and b) adopt similar procedures. My understanding is that the physical separation used for Minuteman could not work with the nuclear submarines; instead, a rigid, practiced discipline maintained safety. People who are compulsive knob-twiddlers are not tolerated on any submarine. In MAD, M can stand for mutual and massive. Details overlooked in worrying about a North Korean missile is that with inertial guidance, one has to know what numbers to set into the guidance system, and for that you need to know a lot about the exact shape of the earth and the exact location of the target, unless you are using GPS. GPS was unheard of in the cold war. Now the world relies on it, but I suspect that somewhere there is a button that will turn off or scramble the signals on suspicion that it is used for guidance of incoming missiles -- it can aslo be jammed. The loss of a city is not the defeat of a nation, even if it were Washington, and small countries don't have many bullets in their gun. The agonizing over 9/11 has much to do with the shock of being bloodied and entering the 'real world'. I think newscasts featuring the daily americans killed and wounded in Iraq, and the 3000+ lost on 9/11, should also show the annual dead and wounded from automobile accidents (30,000+ annually), gunshots, and possibly abortions. Each daily report should show the daily auto deaths and murders. If one is dealing with national policy, some perspective is needed. The measures now protested for Homeland Security would never have been tolerated before 9/11. Short of a police state, we have no protection from backpack bombs. Mike Carrell From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Mar 31 08:35:06 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2VGYxDp012717; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 08:34:59 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2VGYvkV012699; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 08:34:57 -0800 Resent-Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 08:34:57 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <001801c4173d$e3f8e500$8837fea9 cpq> From: "Jones Beene" To: References: <011901c415d6$6d120a60$8837fea9 cpq> <005401c41669$51a40f60$8837fea9@cpq> <006701c416bf$658e3680$8837fea9@cpq> Subject: Re: Shades of Strangelove Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 08:32:43 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ultra5.eskimo.com id i2VGYrDp012666 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53866 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Rick, > Of *course* they're actually planning Something Devious, and they must indeed be stopped or countered! They have thousands of brilliant people whose job it is to come up with Something Devious as well as counter the other guy's plans, and so do we. Especially when they just came out and publicly announced the successful test of a New Offensive Hypersonic Something Devious which counters our Defensive Previous Something Devious? I agree! (except for the "must be stopped" part, if that implies aggression). But the point is - in advanced spy-vs-spy manuvering, you never let the other side know your real intent nor especailly, your real capabilities. Even if they had a New Offensive Hypersonic Something Devious, which I doubt because they would never announce anything 'real'... does that kind of thing pose much of an actual threat to the USA, coming from a country that can't even make decent toilet paper? The MOST devious thing the Russians could ever pull-off against us at this juncture, given that we have already wasted billions on the failed ABM, is to convince us (or our paramoid planners) of another 'potential' threat which would nullify our previous investment, and then send us down another path of blowing billions more. And they seem to be doing a damn good job of winning this new spy-vs-spy war. By now the Russians realize that the threat posed by the USA is NOT military, and it hasn't been since the Cuban missle crisis. It is economic. And they are doing a better job of wrecking our economy with imaginary threats and tweaking our new enemies, than they ever did by posing an actual threat in the cold war. Our greatest gain against the Russians since the end of WWII was not the fall of the Eastern Bloc, per se. It did not even occur last week when seven new nations joined Nato. Three of the new members -- the Baltic states of Lithuania, Estonia and Latvia -- are former Soviet republics, but don't pose a military threat to them or an advantage to us. They and the other new members join the Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland as countries that once were home to Soviet troops but now are allied with the onetime enemies of the Soviet Union. So what? The Russians have benefited GREATLY by not having to station hundreds of thousands of disgruntled troops in those countries, and mostly by not having to take their shoody goods in exchange for Russian oil. The greatest loss to the Russians from this is in not military. And their greatest gain is clearly the 'monster' natural gas pipelines into Germany and Western Europe. Basicaly the present geo-political situation and realignment boils down to this factor, from the Russian perspective: they would rather sell their enormous (and understated) oil and gas reserves (they are to natural gas what the Saudis are to oil) to the Germans, who can pay, rather than to Poles and Czechs, who can't. And from our perspective, does anyone really think that 9/11 would have happened if we had achieved energy independence years ago, and did not bully around Arabs in defence of Israel and low oil prices? > If somebody has an actual workable plan for derailing this insane mess, speak up please. Well, it's not a 'workable' plan, given ingrained present political realities, but here goes. First suggestion is to disregard anything the Russians say in the press, drop ABM, get out of the mid-east, let Israel go her own way, apologize to the Arabs for the innocent deaths, stop exporting jobs to Asia and forget this fiction of a "global" economy. Some economist will say that we have never benefited much from the global economy, when the "real" costs are tallied up, except maybe to be able to buy more reliable cars from the Japanese, or fancier ones from the Germans. How do you deduct the real cost of a lost job, say in a textile mill closed by Chinese competition, to a 30 year old who has no desire to be retrained? That may be a job lost 'forever' and an asset permanently converted into a liability, just to boost one-time trade numbers. Perhaps that is too extreme a view, perhaps not, but our focus should be on US jobs and US intangibles (you can't teach morality when you are killing innocent foreigners), and not on "numbers" like GNP or some other easily manipulated measure of competitive prowess. Let's face it, we have been brainwashed into believing that GNP growth is the measure of success - but that is just a number. The second broad suggestion is to get the USA off of foreign oil. No matter how much it costs us in dollars - the intrinsic cost of doing business with people that hate us (for good reason) is greater than the added cost of bio-fuel, refined coal fuel, or whatever syn-fuel modern technology can devise. The third related suggestion is to switch $50 billion yearly in military spending over to alternative fuels, syn-fuels and energy self-stuffiness immediately... today, and to increase that by 15% per year until LENR, safe nuclear, and others technologies are perfected. Drop hot fusion, drop bureaucratic R&D in favor of individual inventors, get out of S. Korea, pay more attention to Mexico, and so on. There is a new form of "energy isolationism" afloat in the minds of some progressive planners that can do what no amount of military preparation can accomplish. It can place our country in a position of dealing with the rest of the world on our own terms, not as bullies but as buyers (of their goods). Rather than having to essentially grovel and fight our way to satisfying oil cravings, debasing our values and killing innocent civilians, we as a nation should be saying that globalism is about fairness, security, and NOT about numbers. It is absolutely disgusting when our military claims, when asked how many non-combatant Iraqis have died: "Oh, we don't keep those kinds of records!" when every detail about other costs are kept down to the slim dime (unfortunately for Cheney's alma mater - Halliburton). If that denial of the importance of civilian casualties sound Nazi-esque - it is, and it is further evidence of why the Arabs justifiably hate us. And we never needed to go down this path. Many experts who have looked at this issue say that the extra cost of energy self-sufficiency to the USA economy, although is hundreds of billions up front and at least a buck a gallon from there on out - even that, in the longer term perspective of eliminating 9/11 style terrorism, can be paid-off out of hundreds of billions saved in military budgets, which will always increase faster than gasoline prices. Compare our *real* defense budget with our imported oil costs, and it is easy to see how we can begin to solve both problems with a single solution, if we only had the political will-power. And that (the political will-power) unfortunately requires an administration with few ties to 'big oil.' Which is not a political sentiment or party choice - Republicans tend to more isolationist, more practical (outside of oil) and they used to be more fiscally responsible (in the good old days) so the best choice for the upcoming election (from a dispassionate perspective) would be a Republican administration that had somehow come to their senses and become disgusted with 'big oil.' Second best would be ANY administration that had somehow became disgusted with 'big oil." Neither of these choices is on the ballot now, but stranger things have happened. Does anyone really think that 9/11 would have occurred if we had achieved energy independence in the 1980s, when all we lacked then to do it was 'political will power.' Sure, some 'corporate' farmers or coal miners or nuclear plant operators would have benefited most from renewable fuels, and they would probably have become greedy bullies themselves, but wouldn't you rather see those greed-dollars stay in the USA, even in the hands of coal miners or nuclear plant operators, than filter back through Saudi and other Arab sponsors to al Quaeda terrorist ? Jones Whew, I need to lighten up. Even for Jimmy Carter, not exactly a pawn of big oil... his idea of getting tough with the big oil companies is making the guy at the pump check your oil and wash your windows. And Bill Clinton (the only guy who goes to a baseball game and roots for both teams) waffled more when dealing with big oil than the International House of Pancakes. But Dubya takes the (pan)cake for nominating America's Oil Companies for a Noble prize for a lifetime body of work proving that oil and water don't mix. Dick walks into the Oval Office and sees Dubya whooping and hollering, "What's the matter, Mr. President?" The Vice President inquires. "Nothing at all, boss. I just done finished the jigsaw puzzle that Halliburton gave us in record time!" The President beamed. "Dammit, Dubya, that was for my grandkids, but how long did it take?" "Well, the box said '3 to 5 Years' but I did it in a month!" From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Mar 31 10:14:46 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2VIEdvf005122; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 10:14:40 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2VIEXuK005061; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 10:14:33 -0800 Resent-Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 10:14:33 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Sender: jack mail3.centurytel.net Message-ID: <406B0937.24EB8035 centurytel.net> Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 18:08:55 +0000 From: "Taylor J. Smith" X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0C-Caldera (X11; I; Linux 2.2.5-15 i486) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Carbon-Neutral, corn alternative References: <6.0.3.0.2.20040330123125.01ce3028 pop.mindspring.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; name="xh" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="xh" Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53867 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Hi All, Although I think the methanol approach is most adaptable to breaking the political grip of those whose highest priority is to make the world safe for the owners of oil wells, the following from the hydrino list is of considerable interest. NOTE: METHANOL not ethanol -- what did the Martians do with all that corn -- burn it or drink it? Jack Smith ------------------------ http://www.h2cars.biz/artman/publish/article_467.shtml Breakthrough in Electrolysis of Water By PEB based on material from Department of Chemistry, Indian Institute of Technology Madras Mar 21, 2004, 13:56 Prof R. P. Viswanath and his research group of the Department of Chemistry, Indian Institute of Technology Madras has been trying to look into problem of water electrolysis and using a compartmentalized electrolytic cell they have been successful to split water into hydrogen and oxygen at a relatively much lower potential of around 0.90 V compared to 1.23V. The theoretical minimum decomposition potential to split water into the elements hydrogen and oxygen requires a potential of 1.23 V. But due to various reasons a higher potential is necessary to generate hydrogen from water. The energy required to produce hydrogen by electrolysis is about 32.9 kW-hr/kg. A kilogram is about 2.2 lb. For 1 mole (2 g) of hydrogen the energy is about 0.0660 kW-hr / mole. For commercial electrolysis systems that operate at about 1 A/cm2, a voltage of 1.75 V is required. This translates into about 46.8 kW-hr / kg, which corresponds to an energy efficiency of 70%. Lowering the voltage for electrolysis, which will increase the energy efficiency of the process, is an important area for research. Intense research persists to better understand ways to improve these hydrogen production methods. Thermodynamic laws defied? In the Madras laboratory, by using a compartmentalized electrolytic cell, Prof. Viswanath and his team claims to have been successful to split water into hydrogen and oxygen at a relatively much lower potential of around 0.90 V. This they claim is achieved by applying a chemical bias, which is yet to be accounted for. According to Prof. Viswanath the products of electrolysis are only hydrogen and oxygen without any side products like chlorine, alkali, etc., In terms of current efficiency this works out to a phenomenal figure of 135 %. The decomposition potential for water splitting in different media were measured potentiostatically and found to be 1.43 V and 1.60 V in 1 molar H+ (mineral acid - HCl) and sodium hydroxide, respectively. This is as per the expectations. With the setup the Indian found this to happen around 0.85 – 0.95 V. The electrolysis under these conditions has been followed for 30 days. Now the team is in the process of studying this for a longer period and is also contemplating designing different types of cells for further improvement. The electrolysis of water has been studied using polished platinum cathode and various anodes like platinum, titanium, titanium coated with cobalt, nickel, etc.,. The cell is divided into two compartments using a chemically treated disc separator, which Prof. Viswanath points out are not of the nafion type. Two chemically different electrolytes have been used as catholyte and anolyte. The results are shown in the figures 1 to 3. Figure 1. Acid electrolysis of water with Pt electrodes Figure 2. Alkaline electrolysis of water with different anodes(and Pt cathode) Figure 3A. Electrolysis in a divided cell (Ptcathode and different anodes), using chemically different catholyte and anolyte. Figure 3B. Electrolysis in a divided cell (Pt cathode and different anodes), using chemically different catholyte and anolyte. The potential advantages of this cell are: anode and cathode materials can be different the two electrolytes are different chemically and hence electrolyte over potentials can be minimized hydrogen and oxygen are free from contamination can be employed in pollution control exercises also energy saved due to electrolysis at a lower potential compared to the burning of hydrogen can be recycled – in other words one can have a pack of electrolytic cells and hydrogen fuel cells where only electrolyte solution has to be added for running the IC engine or any other device most important of cost of hydrogen will be greatly reduced compared to the present day methods Since, the potential needed to split water is less than the theoretical value of 1.23 volts (namely, ~ 1.0 volt), as per Prof. Viswanath and his team's experimental set-up and the potential developed during oxidation of hydrogen with oxygen is the same 1.23 volts, there is a net gain of ~ 0.23 volt. The experimental setup can be seen (MPG-file 9MB) on the website of Department of Chemistry, Indian Institute of Technology Madras. Editor's note: The result by Prof. Viswanath and his team has been brought in the interest of a discussion on scientific breakthroughs needed to bring about the Hydrogen Economy. Further comments on the results can be communicated to Prof. Viswanath and the Editor of Hydrogen Cars Business. © Copyright 2002-2004 by H2CARSBIZ, ZEES A/S From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Mar 31 10:57:41 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2VIvFDp023983; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 10:57:15 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2VIv8xZ023940; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 10:57:08 -0800 Resent-Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 10:57:08 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <003a01c41751$bbfb1280$8837fea9 cpq> From: "Jones Beene" To: References: <6.0.3.0.2.20040330123125.01ce3028 pop.mindspring.com> <406B0937.24EB8035@centurytel.net> Subject: Re: Carbon-Neutral, corn alternative Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 10:55:27 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ultra5.eskimo.com id i2VIuuDp023877 Resent-Message-ID: <8PqCk.A.81F.ESxaAB ultra5.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53868 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Hi, I'm not sure why these two interesting but disparate ideas were combined in one post, and I hope if anyone comments on this part of it that they change the subject bar to indicate the Indian electrolysis experiment. But in regard to the second report, which appeared today on the hydrino forum, it fits right in with some recent brainstorming about the possibility of there being two or more sources for the "excess energy" in cold fusion. Any such second source would, of course, negate the importance of the finding of a rough proportionality between nuclear ash and excess energy. I downloaded the video, but don't waste your time. It is over 50 megs and basically just shows a cell with water being split at about 1 volt, although the reaction rate is underwhelming. The India OU claim is achieved by applying a full electrochemical bias rather than a simple voltage bias across a single electrolyte, basically this is a dual electrolyte setup - sodium hydroxide on one side and sulfuric acid on the other - membrane in between. Kind of reminiscent of the old "Grove battery". They say, in effect that the OU "is yet to be accounted for," according to Prof. Viswanath. But I believe that the recent speculations in various postings, instigated by Fred Sparber and myself can provide a workable chemical-based hypothesis for this kind of OU, so long as you don't need to get too specific about where the excess is *ultimately* coming from (i.e. Dirac's sea -ZPE- hydrino etc). In terms of efficiency this report works out to a COP figure of 1.35 compared with about 70% efficiency for "normal" unenhanced electrolysis. But again the cross-section is underwhelming so far... but they are using a tiny membrane and widely separated electrodes. This should so immediate improvement with a large surface area membrane. I would strongly suggest that anyone trying to maximize the energy gains of LENR electrolysis should attempt to apply this or some variation of the dual electrolyte technique, to see if there is some added synergy when substituting a Pd cathode for the Pt as used. Personal note: I have split water with less than one volt, but the reaction rate was way too slow to matter much, and I was using thoriated electrodes. Now, I hope to soon set up a cell using this recently reported combination of dual electrolytes with a larger membrane to see what happens to the reaction rate using a combined technique. The Indian researchers are being coy about the membrane composition they used but say that their separator is not of the nafion type. Any guesses? I recently got hold of a large surface area sample proton transfer membrane which, believe it or not, is made of Gore-tex but not your basic REI type... but perhaps it will be interesting to try. Anything that can stand up to a strong acid on one side and a strong base on the other is going to be exotic... but Teflon is claimed to do this and this Gore-tex is said to be based on Teflon. Who knows. Jones BTW in re: the Grove battery: Sir William Robert Grove is known as "Father of the Fuel Cell." Before the Am. Civil War, Grove invented a battery of special significance - a battery which is said to have been *unsurpassed* in terms of power density for 120 years until lithium cells recently arrived. It consisted of zinc in dilute sulfuric acid on one side plus platinum in concentrated nitric acid, separated by a porous ceramic. It was little used because of the extreme cost of platinum and was quickly supplanted by less expensive and less toxic combinations (it discharged poisonous nitric-based gases as the cell discharged, and was almost as much a self-generating hydrogen fuel-cell as battery. But it was truly amazing and *truly neglected*... up to now. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Mar 31 11:31:36 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2VJVRDp000830; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 11:31:27 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2VJVPme000818; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 11:31:25 -0800 Resent-Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 11:31:25 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <406B1D59.37556A93 ix.netcom.com> Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 11:34:49 -0800 From: Edmund Storms Organization: Energy K System X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77C-CCK-MCD {C-UDP; EBM-APPLE} (Macintosh; U; PPC) X-Accept-Language: en,pdf MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Carbon-Neutral, corn alternative References: <6.0.3.0.2.20040330123125.01ce3028 pop.mindspring.com> <406B0937.24EB8035@centurytel.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53869 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: When I hear of people claiming to break water at abnormally low voltage, my hair stands on end and I'm compelled to inject some reality. The minimum potential to decompose pure water under standard state conditions is 1.44 volts. This voltage can be lowered when the activities of H+ or O-- are lowered by some means. Unfortunately, it takes energy to lower these activities, which is seldom recognized when these claims are made. In addition, the closer the applied voltage is to the limit, the smaller the current that can be passed through the cell, hence the smaller the rate of decomposition. Only two variables are available for exploration. The overpotential and cell resistance can be reduced so that a minimum amount of energy is lost to heat or a person can claim to produce an over unity process. If the latter is the claim, the discovery is much more important than just making hydrogen easily. Rational claims for increasing the efficiency are based on applying another source of energy, such as sun light, to increase the overall efficiency, or some inexpensive chemical process to lower the activities. The description below suggests a chemical source. If that is the case, this source is far more important than the electrolysis process, which is only one of several processes that can produce hydrogen from a hydrogen containing chemical. Ed "Taylor J. Smith" wrote: > Hi All, > > Although I think the methanol approach is most > adaptable to breaking the political grip of those > whose highest priority is to make the world safe for the > owners of oil wells, the following from the hydrino list > is of considerable interest. > > NOTE: METHANOL not ethanol -- what did the Martians > do with all that corn -- burn it or drink it? > > Jack Smith > > ------------------------ > > http://www.h2cars.biz/artman/publish/article_467.shtml > > Breakthrough in Electrolysis of Water > By PEB based on material from Department of Chemistry, Indian > Institute of Technology Madras > Mar 21, 2004, 13:56 > > Prof R. P. Viswanath and his research group of the Department of > Chemistry, Indian Institute of Technology Madras has been trying to > look into problem of water electrolysis and using a compartmentalized > electrolytic cell they have been successful to split water into > hydrogen and oxygen at a relatively much lower potential of around > 0.90 V compared to 1.23V. > > The theoretical minimum decomposition potential to split water into > the elements hydrogen and oxygen requires a potential of 1.23 V. But > due to various reasons a higher potential is necessary to generate > hydrogen from water. > > The energy required to produce hydrogen by electrolysis is about 32.9 > kW-hr/kg. A kilogram is about 2.2 lb. For 1 mole (2 g) of hydrogen the > energy is about 0.0660 kW-hr / mole. For commercial electrolysis > systems that operate at about 1 A/cm2, a voltage of 1.75 V is > required. This translates into about 46.8 kW-hr / kg, which > corresponds to an energy efficiency of 70%. Lowering the voltage for > electrolysis, which will increase the energy efficiency of the > process, is an important area for research. Intense research persists > to better understand ways to improve these hydrogen production methods. > > Thermodynamic laws defied? > > In the Madras laboratory, by using a compartmentalized electrolytic > cell, Prof. Viswanath and his team claims to have been successful to > split water into hydrogen and oxygen at a relatively much lower > potential of around 0.90 V. This they claim is achieved by applying a > chemical bias, which is yet to be accounted for. According to Prof. > Viswanath the products of electrolysis are only hydrogen and oxygen > without any side products like chlorine, alkali, etc., In terms of > current efficiency this works out to a phenomenal figure of 135 %. > > The decomposition potential for water splitting in different media > were measured potentiostatically and found to be 1.43 V and 1.60 V in > 1 molar H+ (mineral acid - HCl) and sodium hydroxide, respectively. > This is as per the expectations. With the setup the Indian found this > to happen around 0.85 ? 0.95 V. The electrolysis under these > conditions has been followed for 30 days. Now the team is in the > process of studying this for a longer period and is also contemplating > designing different types of cells for further improvement. > > The electrolysis of water has been studied using polished platinum > cathode and various anodes like platinum, titanium, titanium coated > with cobalt, nickel, etc.,. The cell is divided into two compartments > using a chemically treated disc separator, which Prof. Viswanath > points out are not of the nafion type. Two chemically different > electrolytes have been used as catholyte and anolyte. The results are > shown in the figures 1 to 3. > > > Figure 1. Acid electrolysis of water with Pt electrodes > > > Figure 2. Alkaline electrolysis of water with different anodes(and Pt > cathode) > > > Figure 3A. Electrolysis in a divided cell (Ptcathode and different > anodes), using chemically different catholyte and anolyte. > > > Figure 3B. Electrolysis in a divided cell (Pt cathode and different > anodes), using chemically different catholyte and anolyte. > > The potential advantages of this cell are: > > anode and cathode materials can be different > > the two electrolytes are different chemically and hence electrolyte > over potentials can be minimized > > hydrogen and oxygen are free from contamination > > can be employed in pollution control exercises also > > energy saved due to electrolysis at a lower potential compared to the > burning of hydrogen can be recycled ? in other words one can have a > pack of electrolytic cells and hydrogen fuel cells where only > electrolyte solution has to be added for running the IC engine or any > other device > > most important of cost of hydrogen will be greatly reduced compared to > the present day methods > > Since, the potential needed to split water is less than the > theoretical value of 1.23 volts (namely, ~ 1.0 volt), as per Prof. > Viswanath and his team's experimental set-up and the potential > developed during oxidation of hydrogen with oxygen is the same 1.23 > volts, there is a net gain of ~ 0.23 volt. > > The experimental setup can be seen (MPG-file 9MB) on the website of > Department of Chemistry, Indian Institute of Technology Madras. > > Editor's note: The result by Prof. Viswanath and his team has been > brought in the interest of a discussion on scientific breakthroughs > needed to bring about the Hydrogen Economy. Further comments on the > results can be communicated to Prof. Viswanath and the Editor of > Hydrogen Cars Business. > > © Copyright 2002-2004 by H2CARSBIZ, ZEES A/S From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Mar 31 11:41:47 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2VJfhvf028741; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 11:41:43 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2VJfg8c028726; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 11:41:42 -0800 Resent-Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 11:41:42 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: temalloy metro.lakes.com (Unverified) Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 13:43:20 -0600 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: thomas malloy Subject: John Scheuner Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-DCC-CPI-Metrics: Clear 1161; Body=1 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53870 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Has anybody heard from John lately? From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Mar 31 11:52:08 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2VJq4vf031593; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 11:52:04 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2VJq37I031579; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 11:52:03 -0800 Resent-Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 11:52:03 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Reply-To: From: "Keith Nagel" To: Subject: Indian water splitting cell / was Carbon-Neutral, corn alternative Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 15:18:15 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 In-Reply-To: <003a01c41751$bbfb1280$8837fea9 cpq> X-Rcpt-To: Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53871 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Howdy. It sounds like you'd end up with a bunch of gas, and a cell filled with sodium sulfate solution. Am I missing something here? The cell geometry suggests this as well, optimizing the time over which this reaction can take place. Yes, I understand that the membrane is supposed to prevent that, but given the small (<1ma) currents involved and the lack of supporting data, doesn't it seem a likely possibility? Doing this over the course of a month is suggestive, if everything remains the same except for water level. But no mention is made of pH measurement over the life of the experiment. Here's the Researchers homepage. Plenty of contact info, if you're so inclined. http://www.chem.iitm.ac.in/viswanathrp.htm K. -----Original Message----- From: Jones Beene [mailto:jonesb9 pacbell.net] Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 1:55 PM To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Carbon-Neutral, corn alternative Hi, I'm not sure why these two interesting but disparate ideas were combined in one post, and I hope if anyone comments on this part of it that they change the subject bar to indicate the Indian electrolysis experiment. But in regard to the second report, which appeared today on the hydrino forum, it fits right in with some recent brainstorming about the possibility of there being two or more sources for the "excess energy" in cold fusion. Any such second source would, of course, negate the importance of the finding of a rough proportionality between nuclear ash and excess energy. I downloaded the video, but don't waste your time. It is over 50 megs and basically just shows a cell with water being split at about 1 volt, although the reaction rate is underwhelming. The India OU claim is achieved by applying a full electrochemical bias rather than a simple voltage bias across a single electrolyte, basically this is a dual electrolyte setup - sodium hydroxide on one side and sulfuric acid on the other - membrane in between. Kind of reminiscent of the old "Grove battery". They say, in effect that the OU "is yet to be accounted for," according to Prof. Viswanath. But I believe that the recent speculations in various postings, instigated by Fred Sparber and myself can provide a workable chemical-based hypothesis for this kind of OU, so long as you don't need to get too specific about where the excess is *ultimately* coming from (i.e. Dirac's sea -ZPE- hydrino etc). In terms of efficiency this report works out to a COP figure of 1.35 compared with about 70% efficiency for "normal" unenhanced electrolysis. But again the cross-section is underwhelming so far... but they are using a tiny membrane and widely separated electrodes. This should so immediate improvement with a large surface area membrane. I would strongly suggest that anyone trying to maximize the energy gains of LENR electrolysis should attempt to apply this or some variation of the dual electrolyte technique, to see if there is some added synergy when substituting a Pd cathode for the Pt as used. Personal note: I have split water with less than one volt, but the reaction rate was way too slow to matter much, and I was using thoriated electrodes. Now, I hope to soon set up a cell using this recently reported combination of dual electrolytes with a larger membrane to see what happens to the reaction rate using a combined technique. The Indian researchers are being coy about the membrane composition they used but say that their separator is not of the nafion type. Any guesses? I recently got hold of a large surface area sample proton transfer membrane which, believe it or not, is made of Gore-tex but not your basic REI type... but perhaps it will be interesting to try. Anything that can stand up to a strong acid on one side and a strong base on the other is going to be exotic... but Teflon is claimed to do this and this Gore-tex is said to be based on Teflon. Who knows. Jones BTW in re: the Grove battery: Sir William Robert Grove is known as "Father of the Fuel Cell." Before the Am. Civil War, Grove invented a battery of special significance - a battery which is said to have been *unsurpassed* in terms of power density for 120 years until lithium cells recently arrived. It consisted of zinc in dilute sulfuric acid on one side plus platinum in concentrated nitric acid, separated by a porous ceramic. It was little used because of the extreme cost of platinum and was quickly supplanted by less expensive and less toxic combinations (it discharged poisonous nitric-based gases as the cell discharged, and was almost as much a self-generating hydrogen fuel-cell as battery. But it was truly amazing and *truly neglected*... up to now. From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Mar 31 12:17:37 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2VKHNDp014331; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 12:17:24 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2VKHJcD014297; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 12:17:19 -0800 Resent-Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 12:17:19 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <006e01c4175c$f211cf20$8837fea9 cpq> From: "Jones Beene" To: Cc: "vortex" References: Subject: Re: Indian water splitting cell / was Carbon-Neutral, corn alternative Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 12:15:43 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ultra5.eskimo.com id i2VKHCDp014255 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53872 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Howdy-back > It sounds like you'd end up with a bunch of gas, and a cell > filled with sodium sulfate solution. Am I missing something here? Well, the membrane should be designed to be capable of keeping the base and acid separated for long periods, and only conduct protons - just as in the Grove cell, where unfired ceramic circa 1860 worked for several years of relaying telegraph messages, apparently. > Yes, I understand that the membrane is supposed to prevent > that, but given the small (<1ma) currents involved and > the lack of supporting data, doesn't it seem a likely > possibility? Well, it is so very simple to try to reproduce that we should know soon, shouldn't we? And Grove-cells were multi-amp jobs. I am encouraged by looking at the age and experience of the Indian experimenter. He is a PhD who should not be succumbing to the pitfalls that Ed suggest, nor could the many others who have found something similar but less pronounced. BTW for a historical voyage, possibly enlightening, try googlong the "Grove battery." My info comes from memory and an old textbook, so I'm not sure how much is on the web, but it is/was a fascinating story. Jones From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Mar 31 12:26:00 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2VKPtvf009864; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 12:25:55 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2VKPs0C009854; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 12:25:54 -0800 Resent-Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 12:25:54 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <002801c4175e$63736c90$0550ccd1 MIKEBY3NR533HT> From: "Mike Carrell" To: References: Subject: Re: John Scheuner Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 15:13:31 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Resent-Message-ID: <2CmRf.A.6ZC.SlyaAB ultra6.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53873 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: > Has anybody heard from John lately? > I have heard indirectly that he is on the West Coast. Mike Carrell From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Mar 31 14:27:38 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2VMRRvf010058; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 14:27:28 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2VMRMmf010014; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 14:27:22 -0800 Resent-Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 14:27:22 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <009601c4176f$2afdc7a0$8837fea9 cpq> From: "Jones Beene" To: References: <006e01c4175c$f211cf20$8837fea9@cpq> Subject: Re: Indian water splitting cell Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 14:26:09 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ultra6.eskimo.com id i2VMREvf009963 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53874 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Another pregnant thought on how the "Grove cell" operated. It was the original power source for the early telegraph, back in the days when Morse code was considered high-bandwidth. It may also have been 150 years ahead of its time. The Grove cell blurred the distinction between a battery, an electrolysis cell, and a fuel-cell... and still draws consternation to those like myself who are slightly dyslexic anyway, especially when it comes to pinpointing when a cathode becomes an anode. Essentially, it was not a battery at all but really a combined fuel-cell and "zinc burner" in one package. You may remember the famous Chemalloy patent, where powdered chemalloy produces hydrogen: http://www.nuscam.com/pdf/AlloyPatent.pdf Chemalloy, which was patented in 1952 by Samuel Freedman, is used as a solder today but is basically zinc with some other metals that can act as catalysts. A notorious free energy scam artist recently touted "his" special alloy as a magical free-energy hydrogen source - but on closer inspection, it was found out to be store-bought chemalloy, quadrupled in price. This alloy does indeed work as advertised to produce hydrogen from water with no oxygen - by essentially burning zinc into zinc oxide and releasing the hydrogen. It is not OU at all but combustion. Now to the experiment in question: it uses Pt electrodes on both sides so no zinc or any other metal is consumed. There is no combustion process. Fuel cells are generally reversible to become electrolysis cells. What the Indian fellow may have done is stumbled on a OU reversed fuel-cell that operates through the "bare proton" pathway that I have been floating recently on vortex as a hypothetical way that mass-energy in the form of a 3.4 eV "entity" (photon or light lepton) can be cohered from Dirac's sea. The 3.4 eV entity is best known as both the half-ionization energy of positronium (a major component of the Dirac sea interface) and/or the best estimate for mass of the electron anti-neutrino. It is probably related to both phenomena. The reason this particular cell would keep a proton 'bare' for longer (and were talking picoseconds here) than a normal electrolysis cell is that the two sides of the reaction are separated by the membrane, unlike regular electrolysis and by an extended spatial gap that doesn't seem to interfere with things. Nevertheless, I will predict this: if one of us can produce copious hydrogen with 1 volt or less in such a cell, then all one needs to do to find the source of the free energy is this low-tech (and low-brow) method: 1) rummage around the attic 2) bring out some of your old hippie late-'60s style "artwork" (i.e. iridescent posters from the era of free-love) 3) turn off the lights 4) turn on your electrolysis cell The cell in question should make the old artwork glow anew. Might as well throw "Stairway to Heaven" on the stereo to complete the ambience... Jones With apologies to those post-boomer on the forum who haven't got a clue as to what I am talking about... From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Mar 31 14:57:16 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2VMv90s022741; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 14:57:10 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2VMv8ip022728; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 14:57:08 -0800 Resent-Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 14:57:08 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <406B4DBB.33C52A49 ix.netcom.com> Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 15:01:15 -0800 From: Edmund Storms Organization: Energy K System X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77C-CCK-MCD {C-UDP; EBM-APPLE} (Macintosh; U; PPC) X-Accept-Language: en,pdf MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Indian water splitting cell References: <006e01c4175c$f211cf20$8837fea9@cpq> <009601c4176f$2afdc7a0$8837fea9@cpq> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <8m04sD.A.EjF.Ez0aAB ultra6.eskimo.com> Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53875 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Jones, I think you are mixing protons with phonons. The cell you describe can be argued to make excess energy, but how does this relate to making excess hydrogen? I do not understand how any over unity device can directly decompose more water than is allowed by electron transfer, which is provided by the applied current. To split water, you have to get an electron to go from the oxygen, which is forming at the anode to the hydrogen which is forming at the cathode. How does your mechanism move this electron? Ed Jones Beene wrote: > Another pregnant thought on how the "Grove cell" operated. It was the original power source for the early telegraph, back in the days when Morse code was considered high-bandwidth. It may also have been 150 years ahead of its time. > > The Grove cell blurred the distinction between a battery, an electrolysis cell, and a fuel-cell... and still draws consternation to those like myself who are slightly dyslexic anyway, especially when it comes to pinpointing when a cathode becomes an anode. Essentially, it was not a battery at all but really a combined fuel-cell and "zinc burner" in one package. > > You may remember the famous Chemalloy patent, where powdered chemalloy produces hydrogen: > http://www.nuscam.com/pdf/AlloyPatent.pdf > Chemalloy, which was patented in 1952 by Samuel Freedman, is used as a solder today but is basically zinc with some other metals that can act as catalysts. A notorious free energy scam artist recently touted "his" special alloy as a magical free-energy hydrogen source - but on closer inspection, it was found out to be store-bought chemalloy, quadrupled in price. This alloy does indeed work as advertised to produce hydrogen from water with no oxygen - by essentially burning zinc into zinc oxide and releasing the hydrogen. It is not OU at all but combustion. > > Now to the experiment in question: it uses Pt electrodes on both sides so no zinc or any other metal is consumed. There is no combustion process. Fuel cells are generally reversible to become electrolysis cells. What the Indian fellow may have done is stumbled on a OU reversed fuel-cell that operates through the "bare proton" pathway that I have been floating recently on vortex as a hypothetical way that mass-energy in the form of a 3.4 eV "entity" (photon or light lepton) can be cohered from Dirac's sea. The 3.4 eV entity is best known as both the half-ionization energy of positronium (a major component of the Dirac sea interface) and/or the best estimate for mass of the electron anti-neutrino. It is probably related to both phenomena. > > The reason this particular cell would keep a proton 'bare' for longer (and were talking picoseconds here) than a normal electrolysis cell is that the two sides of the reaction are separated by the membrane, unlike regular electrolysis and by an extended spatial gap that doesn't seem to interfere with things. > > Nevertheless, I will predict this: if one of us can produce copious hydrogen with 1 volt or less in such a cell, then all one needs to do to find the source of the free energy is this low-tech (and low-brow) method: > 1) rummage around the attic > 2) bring out some of your old hippie late-'60s style "artwork" (i.e. iridescent posters from the era of free-love) > 3) turn off the lights > 4) turn on your electrolysis cell > > The cell in question should make the old artwork glow anew. Might as well throw "Stairway to Heaven" on the stereo to complete the ambience... > > Jones > > With apologies to those post-boomer on the forum who haven't got a clue as to what I am talking about... From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Mar 31 15:32:14 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2VNW228005236; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 15:32:02 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2VNVx4E005219; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 15:31:59 -0800 Resent-Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 15:31:59 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <00ac01c41778$26209380$8837fea9 cpq> From: "Jones Beene" To: References: <006e01c4175c$f211cf20$8837fea9@cpq> <009601c4176f$2afdc7a0$8837fea9@cpq> <406B4DBB.33C52A49@ix.netcom.com> Subject: Re: Indian water splitting cell Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 15:30:26 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ultra5.eskimo.com id i2VNVt28005194 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53876 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Ed, > Jones, I think you are mixing protons with phonons. The cell you describe can be argued to make excess energy, but how does this relate to making excess hydrogen? I'm not mixing protons with phonons or anything else - but first, are we clear that the Grove cell functions by combustion of zinc, and is fundamentally different from the Indian cell ? The Grove cell was brought into the discussion in order to clarify an element of the different dynamics, but apparently it didn't achieve that goal. In the Indian cell, hydrogen is formed in proportion to current, as in normal electrolysis - but the decomposition itself is achieved at lower voltage, aided by the biased electrochemistry in place, which apparently cannot happen this way without having acid on one side of the membrane and base on the other, which is a key concept here and major departure from normal electrochemical dynamics. > I do not understand how any over unity device can directly decompose more water than is allowed by electron transfer, which is provided by the applied current. I am not suggesting that. > To split water, you have to get an electron to go from the oxygen, which is forming at the anode to the hydrogen which is forming at the cathode. Not exactly. You are describing normal electrolysis with a single electrolyte. > How does your mechanism move this electron? The thing to keep in mind as being radically different is that electron transfer happens on the membrane, rather than the electrodes. IOW as any proton on the positively -charged side is temporarily freed from its hydroxyl ion near the membrane interface, that hydroxyl is attracted back to the positively-charged electrode, while the proton is repulsed into the membrane then immediately attracted across that membrane by the electrons which have migrated from the negatively-charged electrode. This novel method apparently cannot happen this way without the 'double bias' of having acid on one side and base on the other, which is a key concept here and major departure from normal electrodynamics. I hope that is clearer. Jones From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Mar 31 16:41:01 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i310eu0a019637; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 16:40:56 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i310ettx019623; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 16:40:55 -0800 Resent-Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 16:40:55 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f From: Baronvolsung aol.com Message-ID: <1d1.1d572275.2d9cbef5 aol.com> Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 19:40:21 EST Subject: Re: Fwd: NASA develops 'mind-reading' system To: Roundtable7 yahoogroups.com, aelewis@provide.net, a-albionic yahoogroups.com, vortex-l@eskimo.com CC: Baronvolsung aolo.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1080780021" X-Mailer: 9.0 for Windows sub 5007 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53877 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: -------------------------------1080780021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 3/31/2004 3:41:30 AM Eastern Standard Time, biophilo bellsouth.net writes: http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99994795 NASA develops 'mind-reading' system Updated 15:35 22 March 04 NewScientist.com news service A computer program which can read silently spoken words by analyzing nerve signals in our mouths and throats, has been developed by NASA. Preliminary results show that using button-sized sensors, which attach under the chin and on the side of the Adam's apple, it is possible to pick up and recognize nerve signals and patterns from the tongue and vocal cords that correspond to specific words. "In fact the Roman Temples where amplifiers used to pick up scalar electromagnetic waves from the town to allow priests to listen to the thoughts of their citizens. The knowledge of scalar electro wave circuits has been around since the days of the Romans, and are simply repressed to this day for political reasons of spying and mind control. " The human brain and human body cells are made of 70 percent water and oxygen (H20). Water and oxygen are dieletrics or anticonductors which carry scalar electro voltage potential energy waves. The air in our atmosphere on Earth is an anticonductor and also carry's scalar electro voltage potential energy waves. The human brain and body are receivers much like a cellular phone for scalar electro-voltage energy waves. All of human thought is encoded in scalar electro voltage potential energy waves and photons. We only need to make a receiver much like a cellular phone, that receives scalar electro voltage energy waves to see human thought. Traditional cellular phones and radio waves use magnetoelectric current to carry information. If we modify a cellular phone to carry and receive scalar electromagnetic voltage waves, then we can hear and see human thought on a TV screen by means of scalar electro-magnetic radio waves. Most popular electronics books ignore dielectric scalar electromagnetic voltage wave electronics, even though they can be easily placed into electrical devices by using dielectric circuits instead of conducting circuits. The Romans used scalar wave electronics and vortex detecting devices to build their roads and temples. In fact the Roman Temples where amplifiers used to pick up scalar electro waves from the town to allow priests to listen to the thoughts of their citizens. The knowledge of scalar electro wave circuits has been around since the days of the Romans, and are simply repressed to this day for political reasons of spying and mind control. Baron Von Volsung, www.rhfweb.com\baron, Email: www.rhfweb.com\emailform.html President Thomas D. Clark, Email: www.rhfweb.com\emailform.html, Personal Web Page: www.rhfweb.com\personal New Age Production's Inc., www.rhfweb.com\newage Star Haven Community Services, at www.rhfweb.com\sh Radiation Health Foundation Trust at www.rhfweb.com -------------------------------1080780021 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In a message dated 3/31/2004 3:41:30 AM Eastern Standard Time, biophilo= bellsouth.net writes:
http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id= =3Dns99994795

NASA develops 'mind-re= ading' system
Updated 15:3= 5 22 March 04
NewScientist.com news service
 

A computer program= which can read silently spoken words by analyzing nerve signals in our mout= hs and throats, has been developed by NASA.

Preliminary results show=20= that using button-sized sensors, which attach under the chin and on the side= of the Adam's apple, it is possible to pick up and recognize nerve signals=20= and patterns from the tongue and vocal cords that correspond to specific wor= ds.
"In fact the Roman Temples where amplifiers used to pick up scalar elec= tromagnetic waves from the town to allow priests to listen to the thoug= hts of their citizens.  The knowledge of scalar electro wave circuits h= as been around since the days of the Romans, and are simply repressed to thi= s day for political reasons of spying and mind control. "
 
The human brain and human body cells are made of 70 percent water=20= and oxygen (H20). Water and oxygen are dieletrics or anticonductor= s which carry scalar electro voltage potential energy waves. The air in our=20= atmosphere on Earth is an anticonductor and also carry's scalar electro volt= age potential energy waves.  The human brain and body are receivers muc= h like a cellular phone for scalar electro-voltage energy waves.  All o= f human thought is encoded in scalar electro voltage potential energy waves=20= and photons.  We only need to make a receiver much like a cellular phon= e, that receives scalar electro voltage energy waves to see human=20= thought.  Traditional cellular phones and radio waves use&nbs= p;magnetoelectric current to carry information.  If we modify a ce= llular phone to carry and receive scalar electromagnetic voltage waves, then= we can hear and see human thought on a TV screen by means of scalar electro= -magnetic radio waves.
 
Most popular electronics books ignore dielectric scalar electromagnetic= voltage wave electronics, even though they can be easily placed into electr= ical devices by using dielectric circuits instead of conducting circuits.&nb= sp; The Romans used scalar wave electronics and vortex detecting devices to=20= build their roads and temples.  In fact the Roman Temples where amplifi= ers used to pick up scalar electro waves from the town to allow priests= to listen to the thoughts of their citizens.  The knowledge of scalar=20= electro wave circuits has been around since the days of the Romans, and are=20= simply repressed to this day for political reasons of spying and mind contro= l.

Baron Von Volsung, www.rhfweb.com\baron, Email: w= ww.rhfweb.com\emailform.html
President Thomas D. Clark,
Email: www.rhfweb.com\emailform.html, Personal Web Page: = www.rhfweb.com\personal
New Age Production's Inc., www.rhfweb.com\n= ewage
Star Haven Community Services, at www.rhfweb.com\sh
Radiation=20= Health Foundation Trust at www.rhfweb.com
-------------------------------1080780021-- From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Mar 31 17:54:36 2004 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i311sU0a004839; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 17:54:30 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i311sSvZ004789; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 17:54:28 -0800 Resent-Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 17:54:28 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.1.4.030702.0 Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 20:58:06 -0500 Subject: Deseret Morning News coverage of DoE reversal From: "Eugene F. Mallove" To: "vortex l eskimo.com" Message-ID: Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ultra5.eskimo.com id i311sQ0a004384 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53878 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: More news of the DoE reversal. Nothing new except Huizenga's criminal BS that continues ad infinitum without any basis in fact. HO hum, business as usual in the world of Fizzix Dr. Eugene F. Mallove President, New Energy Foundation, Inc. (A Non-profit, 501(c)(3) Corporation) Editor-in-Chief, Infinite Energy Magazine PO Box 2816 Concord, NH 03302-2816 www.infinite-energy.com editor infinite-energy.com 603-485-4700 Fx: 603-485-4710 ******** http://deseretnews.com/dn/view/0,1249,595052693,00.html Wednesday, March 31, 2004 DOE to review a new batch of claims in cold-fusion quest 'I think it's high time, actually,' BYU's Jones says By Joe Bauman Deseret Morning News       Fifteen years after the University of Utah made the now infamous announcement that two of its chemists had produced "cold fusion" in their lab, the U.S. Department of Energy will review a new batch of claims by other researchers. U. chemists B. Stanley Pons, left, and Martin Fleischmann describe their cold-fusion experiments during a press conference in 1989. Their work was later discredited. Paul Barker, Deseret Morning News      Even though most mainstream scientists consider cold fusion literally cold ‹ as in dead cold ‹ and at least one prominent critic thinks the DOE will be wasting its time, a band of researchers who have refused to give up are delighted by the review.       Although the DOE has received no proposals for new studies or provided new funding in the controversial field, research by what James F. Decker, deputy director of DOE Office of Science, calls some "excellent scientific institutions" the past 15 years deserves a look.       His interest was apparently sparked at least in part by a story in the Wall Street Journal on research results being reported at the 10th International Conference on Cold Fusion.       U. chemists B. Stanley Pons and Martin Fleischmann, announced March 23, 1989, that they had captured the process that powers the sun in a small apparatus working at room temperature.       The hope of limitless, cheap, electrical power faded quickly, even with a $5 million appropriation from the Legislature, as scientists around the world raced ‹ with mixed outcomes ‹ to duplicate the results. Eight months later, a special DOE review panel concluded that the research was almost surely an illusion.       Some scientists had announced they could not reproduce the results. A few believed they were achieving cold fusion. Others pointed to what they considered flaws in the Utah work. Critics became increasingly vocal, with some denouncing Pons and Fleischmann's findings as "pathological science." "A group of scientists requested a meeting with the Office of Science," Decker said in an e-mail. "I met with them sometime last fall. They told me about a lot of research on cold fusion that has been done since the last review that was conducted about 15 years ago. "They presented some data and asked for a review of the scientific research that has been conducted." These were from "excellent scientific institutions and have excellent credentials," Decker wrote. "It was my personal judgment that their request for a review was reasonable." The office will pass along the material they provided, to reviewers with the expertise to evaluate it. He expects the reviewers will spend a couple of days hearing presentations, then will individually offer their opinions on the science. Brigham Young University scientist Steven F. Jones, whose own research preceded the announcement by Pons and Fleischmann, said of the new DOE review, "I think it's high time, actually," adding that "there's a lot going on" in the field.       Jones, a professor of physics and astronomy, never claimed impressive energy outputs in his own studies. He has been looking into unusual findings. He was the lead speaker at the conference last August in Cambridge, Mass., where new findings were announced.       He said he wants to make a clear distinction, and always has, "between the nuclear work which we pioneered" and the claims of excess heat production. "I think those are the two camps, and those camps persist to this day, actually," he said. "I'm a bit disappointed that the physics community has by and large overlooked this work and denigrated it," Jones said. But some physicists expressed interest in the field, he added.       Eugene Mallove, editor of New Energy magazine and a supporter of fusion research since 1989, is excited about the DOE review.       "It turns out that the phenomena we're talking about are far broader than the original discovery," he said in a telephone interview.       What Pons and Fleischmann came upon should not be called fusion, he thinks. Instead, it is "a new form of energy" with mysterious nuclear aspects.       "There undoubtedly is fusion going on of some kind, but it was not plasma fusion," he said. Pons and Fleischmann themselves said it was not plasma (hot) fusion, he added. Perhaps the best term for what is happening is "low-energy nuclear reactions," he said.       Mallove hopes the DOE review will turn policy toward funding the new areas of research and away from the multibillion-dollar chase after hot fusion. The country and the world have paid dearly because the 1989 discovery was not properly followed up, he believes.       "There should never have been a war against cold fusion, but there was one," he said. "And it's coming to an end, a screeching halt."       Among the discoveries Mallove cites are Japanese experiments that seemingly border on alchemy. Elements are changing into other elements in these experiments, he said, and the research has been published in a prestigious Japanese peer-reviewed physics journal.       John Huizenga, a retired professor of chemistry at the University of Rochester, N.Y. and co-chairman of the DOE 20-member panel that reviewed cold-fusion claims in 1989 is against having a review.       Huizenga, author of the 1994 book "Cold Fusion: The Scientific Fiasco of the Century," believes "it's been laid to rest, and I don't see why they're looking at it again," he said in a telephone interview from Rochester. "We looked into the subject very thoroughly. I don't think much will come of it," he said of the review. Without clear-cut results, it's "rather worthless to continue plowing that ground." A great deal of follow-up occurred, but "there have been no positive results that have come along since then which were worthy of establishing another committee," he said.       Some of the researchers who claimed they had substantiated the findings 15 years ago are still claiming results but without any evidence, he said.       Pons and Fleischmann reported enormous amounts of excess energy emanating from their apparatus, he said. If that were true, "that would produce an equivalent amount of fusion products (such as neutrons) and those fusion products should be very easy to see. And we do not see them. The Pons and Fleischmann announcement was "outlandish ‹ quite different from that of Jones," Huizenga said.       Jones and company are "working near the background" level of nuclear material in the environment. "It's very difficult to say one way or another."       If Jones' results hold up, Huizenga said, "they would be very interesting from a scientific point of view but would have no interest in terms of producing energy." "So one has to keep these two claims very separate.       "And Jones is working so near background it's hard to refute his results," Huizenga said, "and on the other From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Mar 31 20:54:53 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i314snki007150; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 20:54:49 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i314slgj007135; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 20:54:47 -0800 Resent-Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 20:54:47 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-ID: <406BA169.1D689920 ix.netcom.com> Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 20:58:16 -0800 From: Edmund Storms Organization: Energy K System X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77C-CCK-MCD {C-UDP; EBM-APPLE} (Macintosh; U; PPC) X-Accept-Language: en,pdf MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vortex-l eskimo.com Subject: Re: Indian water splitting cell References: <006e01c4175c$f211cf20$8837fea9@cpq> <009601c4176f$2afdc7a0$8837fea9@cpq> <406B4DBB.33C52A49@ix.netcom.com> <00ac01c41778$26209380$8837fea9@cpq> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53879 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: Jones Beene wrote: > Ed, > > > Jones, I think you are mixing protons with phonons. The cell you describe can be argued to make excess energy, but how does this relate to making excess hydrogen? > > I'm not mixing protons with phonons or anything else - but first, are we clear that the Grove cell functions by combustion of zinc, and is fundamentally different from the Indian cell ? The Grove cell was brought into the discussion in order to clarify an element of the different dynamics, but apparently it didn't achieve that goal. Well Jones, I'm not confused about the Grove cell. It's the Indian cell and your proposed theory of how energy can be generated by a bare proton that gives me a problem. > > > In the Indian cell, hydrogen is formed in proportion to current, as in normal electrolysis - but the decomposition itself is achieved at lower voltage, aided by the biased electrochemistry in place, which apparently cannot happen this way without having acid on one side of the membrane and base on the other, which is a key concept here and major departure from normal electrochemical dynamics. > > > I do not understand how any over unity device can directly decompose more water than is allowed by electron transfer, which is provided by the applied current. > > I am not suggesting that. I think I understand what you are saying. Over unity is normally defined by comparing the electrical energy supplied to the cell and the energy obtained when the resulting H2 and O2 are combined back to water. The energy supplied to the cell is the V * I * time. I assume you are proposing that because the voltage is very low, the input energy is correspondingly low compared to the amount of H2+O2 produced. However, this comparison can only be made when standard conditions exist in the cell, i.e. unit activity at both electrodes. So, as you say, the novel feature is not having more gas produced than the electron current would allow, as I concluded. Instead, the error is not taking into account the nonstandard conditions in the cell. > > > > > To split water, you have to get an electron to go from the oxygen, which is forming at the anode to the hydrogen which is forming at the cathode. > > Not exactly. You are describing normal electrolysis with a single electrolyte. No, I suggest this requirement exists for all electrolytic devices, as I explain below. > > > > How does your mechanism move this electron? > > The thing to keep in mind as being radically different is that electron transfer happens on the membrane, rather than the electrodes. IOW as any proton on the positively -charged side is temporarily freed from its hydroxyl ion near the membrane interface, that hydroxyl is attracted back to the positively-charged electrode, while the proton is repulsed into the membrane then immediately attracted across that membrane by the electrons which have migrated from the negatively-charged electrode. This novel method apparently cannot happen this way without the 'double bias' of having acid on one side and base on the other, which is a key concept here and major departure from normal electrodynamics. Let's look at the process from the electron's viewpoint. At the cathode, an electron converts a H+ ion (the exact chemical form of the ion is unimportant) to a H atom. This electron must be replaced by one that migrates through the cell from the anode, otherwise a net charge will accumulate at the cathode. So, an electron is transported through the solution as an ion ( the exact kind of ion is unimportant). If a barrier exists between the two electrodes, this electron must pass through the barrier either by conventional electrical conduction or by ion migration. Neither process has ever been shown to generate abnormal energy. The fact that this process occurs in an electrolytic cell changes nothing because the barrier does not know where the electron came from or where it is going. As a result, the process in the barrier is completely independent of the electrolytic process. Within the anode chamber, the electron is also transported by ions, although different ions than were used in the cathode chamber. The presence of acid on one side and base on the other simply causes the activity of H+ to be much different at the two electrodes, hence provides a driving force for the decomposition process. This is what allows the voltage to be less than the standard value. As electrolysis proceeds, the pH will change, requiring energy to be expended when more acid and base are added to maintain the pH difference. If a novel energy producing process were to occur, it would be observed as extra heat energy, not as a lower cell voltage or a lower cell resistance. To argue otherwise, you would need to show how this energy interacted directly with the electrolytic process. Simply introducing a barrier adds nothing novel to the process. Indeed, this is a common practice when two different chemical conditions are required at the two electrodes and the effect is well understood. Sorry Jones, but I think you need to make the idea even clearer. Regards, Ed > > > I hope that is clearer. > > Jones From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Mar 31 21:18:11 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i315I5ki012021; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 21:18:06 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i315I5he012002; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 21:18:05 -0800 Resent-Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 21:18:05 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f X-Sender: hheffner mail.mtaonline.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 20:21:03 -0900 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: hheffner mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) Subject: Mazatzal not all rock Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53880 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: This Spirit Sol 85 microscopic photo shows white material on the right side of the photo that resulted from the grind. It looks like the material froze or bound together after being ground. The fact it fractured indicates it contains water or some crust forming binding agent. This is an indication Mazatzal is no ordinary rock. Just plain dry rock dust doesn't bind like that. See: Regards, Horace Heffner From vortex-l-request eskimo.com Wed Mar 31 23:43:28 2004 Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:smartlst ultra6.eskimo.com [127.0.0.1]) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i317hNki009405; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 23:43:23 -0800 Received: (from smartlst localhost) by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i317hMCO009376; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 23:43:22 -0800 Resent-Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 23:43:22 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to vortex-l-request eskimo.com using -f Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.2.20040331193552.04bd0670 mail.dlsi.net> X-Sender: stevek mail.dlsi.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9 Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 23:47:59 -0800 To: vortex-l eskimo.com From: Steve Krivit Subject: To the Editor of Physics Today Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: vortex-l eskimo.com Reply-To: vortex-l eskimo.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/53881 X-Loop: vortex-l eskimo.com List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: vortex-l-request eskimo.com Status: O X-Status: April 1, 2004 To the Editor of Physics Today, As long as critics of cold fusion continue to formulate their opinions based on a void of information about the field's progress over the past 15 years, their comments have no value. Our interviews with nearly all the prominent critics, documented in "The 2004 Cold Fusion Report," revealed that not one, including Drs. Steven Koonin and William Happer, could cite a single paper that they had read on the topic over the past decade. The argument that cold fusion researchers will acquire credibility only when respected refereed journals publish their work overlooks the fact that these journals have categorically rejected cold fusion papers without a referee's scrutiny because the subject supposedly has been disproved. In the meantime, evidence has mounted that supports the reality of anomalous effects in metal deuterides. This is the conclusion of scientists working for the U.S. Navy, for two major oil companies and for numerous government and university laboratories around the world. Dr. Allen Bard has wisely refrained from dismissing this possibility. In fact, as a paid consultant to the Electric Power Research Institute in 1991, he visited SRI International (Dr. Michael McKubre's cold fusion laboratory) and verified the existence of excess-heat effects, which he documented in an unpublished report to the institute. As well, in 1993, Dr. Richard Garwin visited SRI for two days and documented in an unpublished report to the Pentagon that he could not account for his observations of anomalous energy by any experimental artifact (i.e., error). Dr. Jim Decker was quoted on March 26, 2004 by the New York Times as saying that the Department of Energy's decision to review the evidence for cold fusion was made following the presentation of convincing scientific data by "excellent scientists with excellent credentials." Your inaccurate reference to "political favors in setting up the meeting between Decker and cold fusion researchers" demeans both the Department of Energy and the scientific community by imputing prejudice that is nonsensical. Steven B. Krivit Nadine Winocur, Psy.D. New Energy Times www.newenergytimes.com contact newenergytimes.com Los Angeles, CA