Just The First Step

Saddam is dead, but Saddam's hanging had nothing to do with how many people he killed or caused to die. All aboard, friends, Saddam's death is just one stop on this long Israeli train of Arab holocaust.

Who Where Saddam's Executioners?

What exactly happened in that execution chamber? Inquiring people wanted to know. Who was there and what did they say? Was it Muqtada Al sader's people? Was it the Americans? Was it the Shiites?

 The real story got buried in the sensational details of what took place during the hanging and the case was used to yet inflame sectarian violence amongst the Iraqi people.

Aldujail Issue

Saddam was hung because he executed 148 Shiites, who tried to assassinate him in the middle of the Iran-Iraq war: Some of those arrested, admitted to being Iranian agents. 

Gassing Of The Kurds

Why wasn't Saddam tried on the gassing of the Kurds.

What about the other atrocities committed by Saddam's regime? And, by the way, that regime should not be singled out, because most regimes in the area will condemn to death those who try to assassinate their leaders. What about Halabjah and the gassing of the Kurds? Don't you think the Kurds wanted to try him for that too? 

Lots Of Questions

What about the war with Iran, the invasion of Kuwait, the killing of Al-Sader, the killings of his own son-in-law and other relatives?  What could Saddam have said about all that?

What would he have said about his connections to US and the CIA?

Saddam's Judges

The United States occupation forces that setup the kangaroo court and even approved the judges, and removed judges, who were deemed friendly to

Hung On A Holy Day

Why hang Saddam on the first day of Eid Al-adha, where, in fact, Iraqi laws prohibit the execution of anyone on that particular day. I am sure the Americans could have kept him for one more day if they wanted to. 

 

But hanging him on that day played well in the script of why we went to war against Iraq in the first place. So, why did we go over to Iraq destroyed the country, and killed its President?

Saddam's Staged Capture

The story of a few marines discovering a billionaire hiding in a rabbit hole, never made any sense. He was probably found, drugged and thrown in the hole as a Zionist staged publicity stunt. 

The Degrading Of A Country's President

He was kept in a tiny cell, and fed Fruit Loops by a Jewish army nurse called Robert Ellis. The sole purpose was to keep him alive so he could be publicly hanged.

To this day Saddam asked, " Why did the Americans invade Iraq?"

A Message To Others

And that is the tragedy of Arab leaders. A president of what once was the strongest and most technological Arab country had no clue why he was invaded and his country destroyed. How many other Arab leaders have no clue of what's coming to them?

Saddam's Hanging Was About Oil

Theodore Herzl, the founder of Zionism, says that the area of the Jewish State stretches: "From the Brook of Egypt to the Euphrates." Rabbi Fischmann, member of the Jewish Agency for Palestine, declared in his testimony to the U.N. Special Committee of Enquiry on 9 July 1947: "The Promised Land extends from the River of Egypt up to the Euphrates, it includes parts of Syria and Lebanon."

Israel's Strategy

"This strategy paper plan operates on two essential premises. To survive, Israel must become an imperial regional power, and 2) must effect the division of the whole area into small states by the dissolution of all existing Arab states." This document is a detailed document of Israel's strategy for the Middle East, which is based on breaking up Arab countries into small, weak, and ethnically structured states.

Israel Wants Countries Broken Up

The Document stated: " The existence, prosperity and steadfastness of the Jewish state will depend upon its ability to adopt a new framework for its domestic and foreign affairs." "All the Arab States east of Israel are torn apart, broken up and riddled with inner conflict." "Iraq is, once again, no different in essence from its neighbors, although its majority is Shi'ite and the ruling minority Sunni. Sixty-five percent of the population has no say in politics, in which an elite of 20 percent holds the power. In addition there is a large Kurdish minority in the north, and if it weren't for the strength of the ruling regime, the army and the oil revenues, Iraq's future state would be no different than that of Lebanon in the past or of Syria today.

Did Israel Formant The Iran-Iraq War

The seeds of inner conflict and civil war are apparent today already, especially after the rise of Khomeini to power in Iran, a leader whom the Shiites in Iraq view as their natural leader."

Why Iraq And Not Syria?

"Iraq, rich in oil on the one hand and internally torn on the other, is guaranteed as a candidate for Israel's targets. Its dissolution is even more important for us than that of Syria. Iraq is stronger than Syria. In the short run it is Iraqi power, which constitutes the greatest threat to Israel. An Iraqi-Iranian war will tear Iraq apart and cause its downfall at home even before it is able to organize a struggle on a wide front against us. Every kind of inter-Arab confrontation will assist us in the short run and will shorten the way to the more important aim of breaking up Iraq into denominations as in Syria and in Lebanon. In Iraq, a division into provinces along ethnic/religious lines as in Syria during Ottoman times is possible. So, three (or more) states will exist around the three major cities: Basra, Baghdad and Mosul, and Shi'ite areas in the south will separate from the Sunni and Kurdish north. It is possible that the present Iranian-Iraqi confrontation will deepen this polarization." As you see here in simple English Israel planned along time ago to break up Iraq. Now we move to Israel's plan of attack. Since Israel was unable to accomplish the task of breaking up Iraq on its own therefore, it had to give the job to a surrogate power. That power of course is the U.S.

The Israeli Goals

The second document was prepared back in 1992 by the Cheney Defense Department under the administration of George H.W.Bush and came to be known publicly as the 2004 book: The Rise of the Vulcans, reported that these men were given the task of devising the DPG, a classified document that outlines U.S. military strategies and provides a framework for developing the defense budget. Libby and Wolfowitz were given the task of devising a new framework for the U.S. policy in the post cold-war era. Khalilzad, a long time aid to Wolfowitz was given the task of drafting the report, probably just to have a Muslim in the midst of this complicated policy paper. Other participants in this project were Richard Pearle, and Albert Wohlstetter who was credited by many to be Wolfowitz and Pearle mentor.

US Military To Do Israel's Bidding

The main points of this document were: Massive increase in defense spending, the U.S. is the only superpower in the World, prevent any regional power from challenging the U.S., the use of preventive or preemptive force to protect U.S. interests, and interfering in disputes throughout the World even when the U.S. is not involved in these disputes. They stated that the United States should â¤retain the preeminent responsibility for addressing selectively those wrongs which threaten not only our interests, but those of our allies or friends, or which could seriously disrupt international relations?

Israel is referred to as an ally and a friend of the U.S. by most government officials in America every chance they get. Just keep this in mind as you follow this plan, which took 10 years to implement. When news of the plan was first leaked out to the public in 1992, the White House publicly rejected it and distanced itself from the people who worked on it. Interestingly enough the men who were an outcast during the rein of Bush the father, became the rulers of the White House during the rein of Bush the son, who also thinks of himself as the holy ghost.

In 1996 another document was prepared by the Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies by the "Study Group on a New Israeli Strategy Toward 2000" Wolfowitz and Pearle among others drafted the document entitled  A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm" this document was a straight forward strategy paper or a plan of what Israel should do to become the only regional power in the Middle East. The document stated: "Israel can shape its strategic environment, in cooperation with Turkey and Jordan, by weakening, containing, and even rolling back Syria. This effort can focus on removing Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq â¤" an important Israeli strategic objective in its own right-" This clearly proves that the removal of Saddam Hussein from power is an Israeli plan that took place long before September 11, 2001.

Israel Wants The Mideast And Has The Power

I t was also written: "Israel can make a clean break from the past and establish a new vision for the U.S.-Israeli partnership based on self-reliance, maturity and mutuality - not one focused narrowly on territorial disputes - Israel's 'new strategy' based on a shared philosophy of peace through strength. In other words its time for Israel to step up and claim "what is rightfully hers", the foreign policy of the United States based on the premise that AIPAC is in total control of Congress, and other institutions such as JINSA are in control of policy. Israel no longer needs to operate behind the scenes.

You might wonder how these Zionists sold the idea of destroying Iraq for Israel to others in the United States who may not be as enthusiastic about making such a decision for Israel's benefit. This is not the problem it might appear to be. There are always other documents of a similar nature that could be churned up to fit the U.S. psyche. This brings us up to the fourth document that was prepared by the same cabal,  l The Project for the New American Century This document was based on the 1992   and renewed few months before Bushâ¤s regime was installed in 2000 by a single manâ¤s vote in the 5-4 supreme court decision. Like the old 1992 document this one called for: An attack on Iraq and the removal of Saddam regime, huge increase in military budget, establishing new American military bases all over the world, stressing the concept of "pre-emptive war" and unilateral action as a strategic policy by circumventing the UN. As you can see the plan to attack Iraq was planned years before the planes hit the towers and at a time when Bin Laden was an American asset. As you can see this plan looks pretty good for the American appetite for world hegemony.