>From - Sat Mar 02 00:57:17 2024
Received: by 10.140.166.8 with SMTP id o8mr1023095rve.9.1247448303254;
Sun, 12 Jul 2009 18:25:03 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <mit..._at_tscmusa.com>
Received: from QMTA10.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta10.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.30.17])
by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id 21si405296pxi.4.2009.07.12.18.25.01;
Sun, 12 Jul 2009 18:25:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning mit..._at_tscmusa.com does not designate 76.96.30.17 as permitted sender) client-ip=76.96.30.17;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning mit..._at_tscmusa.com does not designate 76.96.30.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=mit..._at_tscmusa.com
Message-Id: <4a5a8cee.151bf30a.6ae4.41cbSMTPIN_ADDED_at_gmr-mx.google.com>
Received: from OMTA02.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.19])
by QMTA10.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast
id FD901c0070QkzPwAADR2yE; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 01:25:02 +0000
Received: from OEM ([68.28.138.251])
by OMTA02.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast
id FDQg1c0065Rdf0L8NDQm3D; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 01:24:57 +0000
From: "TSCM/Special Ops Group Inc." <Mit..._at_tscmusa.com>
To: <TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com>
Subject: RE: [TSCM-L] {3890} Judicial TSCM "wave-offs"
Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 20:24:40 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510
In-Reply-To: <1247288615.4a581d27e5cbf_at_webmail.uslec.net>
Thread-Index: AcoDRVqIr/+dR8fJTViZLd44UVa0kwAEH5zQ
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579
Good question,good reading:
http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RL34303.pdf
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obstruction_of_justice
Mitch Davis
TSCM/Special Operations Group Inc.
20 Music Square West,Suite 208
Nashville,TN. 37203
Mail to:M..._at_tscmusa.com
Website www.tscmusa.com
(615) 251 0441
fax (615) 523 0300
"Maintaining a higher degree of excellence"
*******************************************
Tools for investigators at: covertworx.com
CONFIDENTIALITY WARNING!!! This electronic message contains information
which may be privileged and/or confidential. This information is intended
for the exclusive use of the individual(s), entity, or persons named or
indicated above. Any unauthorized access, disclosure, copying, distribution,
or use of any parts of the contents of this message/information is strictly
prohibited.
-----Original Message-----
From: TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com [mailto:TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of ed
Sent: Saturday, July 11, 2009 12:04 AM
To: TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com
Subject: [TSCM-L] {3890} Judicial TSCM "wave-offs"
Quoting "James M. Atkinson" <jm..._at_tscm.com>:
"law enforcement officers can not legally wave a TSCM'er off, only a sitting
judge can do that"
Interesting. Is there a legal "Table of Authorities" someone can post to
the list citing relevant federal case law on this? Or any relevant Federal
"Rules of Criminal Procedure"?
Having that info would be helpful to any TSCM practitioner facing an
attempted extrajudicial wave-off by a LE agency overstepping its
jurisdiction. Those situations are probably far more common that judicial
wave-offs; TSCM practitioners should come prepared to defend themselves.
Thanks much,
-Ed
Received on Sat Mar 02 2024 - 00:57:17 CST