>From - Sat Mar 02 00:57:22 2024
Received: by 10.114.25.3 with SMTP id 3mr3959055way.2.1230008138648;
Mon, 22 Dec 2008 20:55:38 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <eric.s..._at_gmail.com>
Received: from mail-bw0-f21.google.com (mail-bw0-f21.google.com [209.85.218.21])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m37si8467026waf.0.2008.12.22.20.55.36;
Mon, 22 Dec 2008 20:55:37 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of eric.s..._at_gmail.com designates 209.85.218.21 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.218.21;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of eric.s..._at_gmail.com designates 209.85.218.21 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=eric.s..._at_gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) head..._at_gmail.com
Received: by bwz14 with SMTP id 14so6576051bwz.15
for <TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com>; Mon, 22 Dec 2008 20:55:36 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to
:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
bh=TQXnyYdOytQ5t6RjrY+R0dNF0w/JwL3SKg8mzF3XSEw=;
b=cJVz417h9LmTnE9bnDD9sU4sXpk0iYrez5ybJhsacoiE+7WOVd+Zm1t9foM1gAT8QX
2w6/ViORgWhvQvpuKBIApuUTn4LXJDQBKqC0u4vfVuWUfSwzyr65U31mO0XY8vy/3RCU
xBgE7pQbq/OmQHF+rC7oOLjXwJonVZOD3Eqx0=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version
:content-type:references;
b=ETgh0907mObyrnpcits5gF7g8hWJc2/Ih0PGiHsNd1jqnDnbae9yybzblQ78pA0G2U
jy4kWprOvhtv30TKtJ87Zo/QswNvR/qprTCuC3go9OhY/j/ayEN5CZ9ZbKRNCYUhAEql
yNBL3KbYNv+Ab29iYBAJueU5/KlBwZuZxpObQ=
Received: by 10.223.111.205 with SMTP id t13mr5638691fap.62.1230008135983;
Mon, 22 Dec 2008 20:55:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.223.118.68 with HTTP; Mon, 22 Dec 2008 20:55:35 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <8db67cf10812222055x34fb2fa4oc50e4ae9ef24f433_at_mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 23:55:35 -0500
From: "Eric Schmiedl" <eric.s..._at_gmail.com>
To: TSCM-L2006_at_googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [TSCM-L] {3119} Re: Pearls Before Swine Series - Scope of Work Matrix
In-Reply-To: <7.0.1.0.2.20081222192536.151f3a60_at_tscm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_Part_71425_12200695.1230008135974"
References: <7.0.1.0.2.20081219003659.16ae4fe8_at_tscm.com>
<494BED6C.3060201_at_gmail.com>
<7.0.1.0.2.20081220032454.190bbe10_at_tscm.com>
<0812212029590.0_at_somehost.domainz.com>
<BLU149-DS15A734AB69DBDDFA53E3E6BCEE0_at_phx.gbl>
<494ED89B.6070905_at_gmail.com>
<BLU149-DS207C1153090875E1261558BCEF0_at_phx.gbl>
<7.0.1.0.2.20081222000749.18902490_at_tscm.com>
<7.0.1.0.2.20081222192536.151f3a60_at_tscm.com>
------=_Part_71425_12200695.1230008135974
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
James,
So what's your protocol for photographing prior to a TSCM inspection? My
initial
impression -- probably based on how 8x10s are traditionally used -- was that
you
went in and attempted to capture everything from one vantage point on
perhaps
several different films, but it's obvious that's not the case. Particularly
since you're using the imagery to detect changes over time, I imagine that
you have a very pre-defined way of working.
Off the top of my head, I would assume that the most logical way to do it is
to
work inwards: shoot an overview, shoot to capture possible toolmarks and
evidence of tampering, then remove the top layer and shoot behind the
panel(s),
and continue on until you've reached the end of your average nest of wiring.
Is
this correct?
What kind of film do you find most useful for revealing what kind of
markings?
Best,
Eric
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 7:32 PM, James M. Atkinson <jm..._at_tscm.com> wrote:
>
>
> OK, one more time (but this time with corrected spellings so folks
> can read it):
>
> Sorry folks I often type faster then I can proof-read, and often
> forget to go back and proof-read before I hit send. It also helps
> that I al often working three or four computers at a time, and rarely
> type while watching either the screen or keyboard. I have also been
> known to run two computers, on two keyboards at the same time (one
> for the left hand and one with the right).
>
> Sorry about the typo's guys, yeah I know it is a problem, but as most
> of you know by now I don't really care about the typo's.
>
>
> --- Repost ---
>
> Yes, you are getting the idea.
>
> Now imagine combining infrared illumination and filtering, UV
> sensitive films, color films, panchromatic films, narrow band B&W
> films, and so on and your capabilities of detecting even minuscule
> changes are vastly expanded.
>
> Combine this with physicals things that the TSCM specialist can do to
> make things more visible such as adding UV sensitive gels to all the
> wires and you can really upset the eavesdropper. Merely clipping on a
> butt set will still leave marks on otherwise virgin connection
> blocks, and a sloppy eavesdropper is going to spread that UV gell all
> over the place as soon as they touch anything.
>
> Now extend this beyond just wiring blocks, to furnishings, actual
> telephones, speaker-phone, computers, wall plates, and such.
>
> Remember that any tool that you can use to give you more of an edge
> against an eavesdropper is worth obtaining and learning to use.
>
> -jma
>
>
>
>
>
> At 12:14 AM 12/22/2008, James M. Atkinson wrote:
> >Yes, you are getting the idea.
> >
> >Now imaging combing infrared illumination and filtering, UV
> >sensitive films, color films, panchromatic films, narrow band B&W
> >films, and so on and your capabilities of detecting even minuscule changes
> >
> >Combine this with physicals thing that the TSCM specialist can do to
> >make things more visible such as adding UV sensitive gels to the
> >wires and you can really upset the eavesdropper. Merely clipping on
> >a butt set will leave marks on otherwise virgin connection blocks,
> >and a sloppy eavedropper is going to spread that UV gell all over
> >the place as soon as they touch anything.
> >
> >Now extend this beyond just wiring blocks, to furnishings, actual
> >telephones, speaker-phone, computers, and such.
> >
> >Remember that any tool that you can use to give you more of an edge
> >against an eavesdropper is worth obtaining and learning to use.
> >
> >-jma
> >
> >
> >
> >At 09:13 PM 12/21/2008, Its from Onion wrote:
> >>Well I know that having a 8x10 or 24x36 shot of a room back at the
> >>office is a great 'thinking tool.' I can see things on that photo
> >>that may not be evident at first, second or even 3rd visit.
> >>Also its great reference to document any changes that may have been
> >>made buy authorized or 'UN-' authorized persons.
> >>
> >>Lets remember, a picture is worth a 1000 words.
> >>Onion
> >>
> >
>
> >----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > World Class, Professional, Ethical, and Competent Bug Sweeps, and
> >Wiretap Detection using Sophisticated Laboratory Grade Test Equipment.
>
> >----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > James M. Atkinson Phone: (978) 546-3803
> > Granite Island Group Fax: (978) 546-9467
> > 127 Eastern Avenue #291 Web: http://www.tscm.com/
> > Gloucester, MA 01931-8008 E-mail: mailto:jm..._at_tscm.com
>
> >----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > We perform bug sweeps like it's a full contact sport, we take no
> prisoners,
> >and we give no quarter. Our goal is to simply, and completely stop the
> spy.
>
> >----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
>
>
>
> >
>
------=_Part_71425_12200695.1230008135974
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
James,<br>
So what's your protocol for photographing prior to a TSCM inspection? M=
y initial<br>
impression -- probably based on how 8x10s are traditionally used -- was tha=
t you<br>
went in and attempted to capture everything from one vantage point on perha=
ps<br>
several different films, but it's obvious that's not the case. Part=
icularly since you're using the imagery to detect changes over time, I =
imagine that you have a very pre-defined way of working.<br>
<br>
Off the top of my head, I would assume that the most logical way to do it i=
s to<br>
work inwards: shoot an overview, shoot to capture possible toolmarks and<br=
>
evidence of tampering, then remove the top layer and shoot behind the panel=
(s),<br>
and continue on until you've reached the end of your average nest of wi=
ring. Is<br>
this correct?<br><br>What kind of film do you find most useful for revealin=
g what kind of markings? <br>
<br>
Best,<br>
Eric<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 7:32 PM, Jam=
es M. Atkinson <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:jm..._at_tscm.com">jm..=
._at_tscm.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=
=3D"border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; p=
adding-left: 1ex;">
<br>
<br>
OK, one more time (but this time with corrected spellings so folks<br>
can read it):<br>
<br>
Sorry folks I often type faster then I can proof-read, and often<br>
forget to go back and proof-read before I hit send. It also helps<br>
that I al often working three or four computers at a time, and rarely<br>
type while watching either the screen or keyboard. I have also been<br>
known to run two computers, on two keyboards at the same time (one<br>
for the left hand and one with the right).<br>
<br>
Sorry about the typo's guys, yeah I know it is a problem, but as most<b=
r>
of you know by now I don't really care about the typo's.<br>
<br>
<br>
--- Repost ---<br>
<br>
Yes, you are getting the idea.<br>
<br>
Now imagine combining infrared illumination and filtering, UV<br>
sensitive films, color films, panchromatic films, narrow band B&W<br>
films, and so on and your capabilities of detecting even minuscule<br>
changes are vastly expanded.<br>
<br>
Combine this with physicals things that the TSCM specialist can do to<br>
make things more visible such as adding UV sensitive gels to all the<br>
wires and you can really upset the eavesdropper. Merely clipping on a<br>
butt set will still leave marks on otherwise virgin connection<br>
blocks, and a sloppy eavesdropper is going to spread that UV gell all<br>
over the place as soon as they touch anything.<br>
<br>
Now extend this beyond just wiring blocks, to furnishings, actual<br>
telephones, speaker-phone, computers, wall plates, and such.<br>
<br>
Remember that any tool that you can use to give you more of an edge<br>
against an eavesdropper is worth obtaining and learning to use.<br>
<br>
-jma<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
At 12:14 AM 12/22/2008, James M. Atkinson wrote:<br>
>Yes, you are getting the idea.<br>
><br>
>Now imaging combing infrared illumination and filtering, UV<br>
>sensitive films, color films, panchromatic films, narrow band B&W<b=
r>
>films, and so on and your capabilities of detecting even minuscule chan=
ges<br>
><br>
>Combine this with physicals thing that the TSCM specialist can do to<br=
>
>make things more visible such as adding UV sensitive gels to the<br>
>wires and you can really upset the eavesdropper. Merely clipping on<br>
>a butt set will leave marks on otherwise virgin connection blocks,<br>
>and a sloppy eavedropper is going to spread that UV gell all over<br>
>the place as soon as they touch anything.<br>
><br>
>Now extend this beyond just wiring blocks, to furnishings, actual<br>
>telephones, speaker-phone, computers, and such.<br>
><br>
>Remember that any tool that you can use to give you more of an edge<br>
>against an eavesdropper is worth obtaining and learning to use.<br>
><br>
>-jma<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
>At 09:13 PM 12/21/2008, Its from Onion wrote:<br>
>>Well I know that having a 8x10 or 24x36 shot of a room back at the<=
br>
>>office is a great 'thinking tool.' I can see things o=
n that photo<br>
>>that may not be evident at first, second or even 3rd visit.<br>
>>Also its great reference to document any changes that may have been=
<br>
>>made buy authorized or 'UN-' authorized persons.<br>
>><br>
>>Lets remember, a picture is worth a 1000 words.<br>
>>Onion<br>
>><br>
><br>
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------=
-----------------------------<br>
> World Class, Professional, Ethical, and Competent Bug Sweeps, a=
nd<br>
>Wiretap Detection using Sophisticated Laboratory Grade Test Equipment.<=
br>
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------=
-----------------------------<br>
> James M. Atkinson &nbs=
p; Phone: (978=
) 546-3803<br>
> Granite Island Group &=
nbsp; Fax: (97=
8) 546-9467<br>
> 127 Eastern Avenue #291  =
; Web: <a href=3D"
http://www.tscm.com/" target=
=3D"_blank">
http://www.tscm.com/</a><br>
> Gloucester, MA 01931-8008 &nb=
sp; E-mail: mailto:<a href=3D"mailto:jm..._at_tscm.com">jm..._at_tscm=
.com</a><br>
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------=
-----------------------------<br>
> We perform bug sweeps like it's a full contact sport, we tak=
e no prisoners,<br>
>and we give no quarter. Our goal is to simply, and completely stop the =
spy.<br>
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------=
-----------------------------<br>
><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div><br>
------=_Part_71425_12200695.1230008135974--
Received on Sat Mar 02 2024 - 00:57:22 CST