May I ask my dear reader whether he or she recognizes any of the following names:

Fritz Klein, Heinz Thilo, Bruno Kitt, Erwin von Helmersen, Werner Rohde, Hellmuth Vetter,

Horst Schumann, Carl Clauberg, Hans Wilhelm König, Franz Lucas, Alfred Trzebinski,

Oskar Dienstbach, Siegfried Schwela, Franz von Bodmann, Kurt Uhlenbroock,

Eduard Wirths, Hans Münch, Johann Paul Kremer, Horst Fischer, Friedrich Entress?

Unless you’re an expert in the field, you probably have no clue who these people are.

The only name I would recognize, if I were to turn off my expert knowledge, is Clauberg,

and that only because that was the name of my high-school art teacher (first name unknown).

All the men listed above were at some point or other SS physicians at the infamous Auschwitz Camp.[1]

I omitted one name from the list, and that for a good reason, because that name would give it all away:

Josef Mengele.

Why is it that we all recognize this one name, but have no idea about all the others? And with

all, I am not just referring to any of us. This all also includes Auschwitz survivors. If we read

or listen to the many testimonies of the thousands of Auschwitz survivors, there seems to

have been only one evil person in that entire huge camp: Josef Mengele. Almost every

survivor mentions him as an evil SS doctor sending people either to the gas chambers or

subjecting them to some cruel, senseless, torturous experiments. Just as Auschwitz has

become the symbol for the Holocaust in general, so does Mengele symbolize the

evil of Auschwitz. They are synonymous.

Why is that so?

Mengele Hysteria

Most of the above-listed individuals were arrested after the war at some point and either

committed suicide while incarcerated or were sentenced to death or to extended prison terms.

Mengele escaped. He was never caught. In 1985, years after his death in 1979 in his

South-American exile, however, his former whereabouts were revealed, his remains

eventually exhumed and identified.[2]

Mengele wasn’t the only Auschwitz physician who managed to escape, though. Hans Wilhelm König

was even better than Mengele. König disappeared without leaving a trace.

But no one has ever heard that name, or have you?

We get an idea what the basis of the “Mengele Myth” is if we listen to one of the

most-determined Nazi hunters of the world, the Israeli Efraim Zuroff. While hunting

for Josef Mengele during the 1980s, he stumbled upon the remarkable fact that survivors

immediately after the war did not describe Mengele as the same evil criminal as he was

portrayed in the 1980s or even later. Sifting through newsletters published right after

the war by and for “survivors,” he came across the (false) news that Mengele had been

arrested in early 1947. On that occasion, survivor newsletters asked their readers for

incriminating testimonies against Mengele, and such testimonies were then even published.

But, as Zuroff summarizes:[3]

Of course, memories are more accurate a short time after an alleged event than decades later,

so the image survivors had of Mengele in 1947 was most certainly more accurate as well.

In 1986, shortly after the hunt for Mengele had been over, the Czech-German historian

Zdenek Zofka wrote these memorable lines about how Mengele had become the center of

attention of the Holocaust Industry:[4]

Zofka’s aim with his paper was an attempt to “correct the image of Josef Mengele, which

has been distorted and exorbitantly exaggerated by the sensational media.” He admits that,

when trying to assess the crimes allegedly committed by Mengele, there is basically no

documentary evidence to rely on, and that relying on witness accounts in such an

atmosphere of hysteria is problematic, to say the least. He continuous by stating:

“All too often, it is impossible to be sure that their [the witnesses’] recollections really refer

to Mengele at all. It is all too often possible to show that Mengele has been confused with

other SS physicians. Almost all the inmates state that they were selected by Mengele on

the ramp [to be sent to the gas chamber]. But camp physicians performed the selections

in shifts; Mengele performed no more selections than any of the others.” (ibid., p. 246)

This underscores the point I made earlier.

When assessing Mengele’s purported crimes, we have to distinguish three different sets:

Let’s discuss all three of them here briefly, with reference to further reading for those who

want to learn more. Let’s start with the last one first, because it can be dealt with rather swiftly.

Random Medical Experiments

There is “eyewitness” testimony galore about utterly senseless, cruel experiments

allegedly performed by Mengele, like changing eye colors by injecting dye into an eye,

transplanting limbs and organs to random places in the body, and other nonsense. While

studying hundreds of “survivor” testimonies, I’ve come across a good share of these

insults to the intellect, so insulting, indeed, that I will not waste my time listing them here.

Google the net, and you’ll stumble across these Halloweenish horror stories all over the

place. People evidently like to gawk at guts and gore, so the survivors, protected from

scrutiny by their aura of sainthood, cater to that need. Interestingly, the alleged victims of

these experiments, quite frequently the very witnesses telling these tales, show no signs

whatsoever of these cruel procedures. And it goes without saying that there is not the slightest

proof for any of it: no documents, no autopsies, no medical examination on survivors proving it. Nothing.

It’s all a pack of lies, sweet and simple.

Twins

The alleged cruel experiments Mengele is said to have performed with twins deported to

Auschwitz were so lethal that most of the twins he had enrolled in his research not only

survived the war, but were even able to form an association in 1984, toward the peak of

the Mengele hysteria, which was meant to lobby for their and their descendants’ interests:

Children of Auschwitz Nazi Deadly Lab Experiment Survivors (CANDLES). Read and

rethink the association’s name: How can deadly lab experiments have any survivors?

In fact, as Italian historian Carlo Mattogno has shown in his paper on Mengele’s twin research,

[5] there are three facts which clearly prove that Mengele did not commit any crimes on those twins:

Separately, think of that: Children are not supposed to have gotten beyond the camp’s

railway ramp. Since they were obviously unfit for labor, the Holocaust orthodoxy has it that

they were sent to the gas chamber straight away, but that’s evidently not

what happened, not just with Mengele’s twin children, but in general.

For the long list of twins and children at Auschwitz who survived the camp, see Mattogno’s paper.

Gas-Chamber Selections

Which brings me to the final point: The selections at the railway ramps near the Auschwitz Camp

and (later) inside the Auschwitz-Birkenau Camp. There can be no doubt that these selections

took place. They happened at Auschwitz, and they happened at other German wartime

camps as well. They were usually performed by physicians, and it is safe to say that Mengele,

as one of the many Auschwitz physicians, was ordered to do them as well.

But what were they about? Did those in charge, Mengele among them,

decide who got to live and who was to die in the gas?

To answer this question comprehensively would require the analysis of tens of thousands

of documents that survived the war. I’m not going to do this here, most importantly because

there is no need to reinvent the wheel. Others have done that already, and I’ll point the

reader to them.

The issue boils down to two questions:

Regarding a., let me quote from an article published in late 2016 in the conservative mainstream

periodical Taki’s Magazine. It was written by Jewish activist David Cole, who in the 1990s

was dabbling for a while in Auschwitz research. In this Taki article, Cole, who believes in all

other aspects of the orthodox Holocaust narrative, explains why he has problems with Auschwitz:[6]

David Cole

 

Fact is that challenging the orthodox Auschwitz – and Mengele – narrative is a crime in

many countries, and in those countries where it is not, doing so will still turn challengers

into social pariahs. Hence, you won’t hear a word from any mainstream scholar about

the fact that “the evidence just isn’t there.” When scientists have to act under the threat

of legal or professional penalty, we can neither trust them nor their research results.

All that remains are the studies of those who don’t bend to the pressure; who literally risk

loss of life, limb and liberty when publishing their iconoclastic research results. I may point

out two of those studies which can give the reader a good overview as to why we have an

“Auschwitz problem”:

1. The Real Case of Auschwitz by the already-mentioned Carlo Mattogno.[7] This thick

volume of some 750 pages thoroughly discusses all the relevant documentary evidence

on those buildings which are said to have contained homicidal gas chambers. This is the

main foundation upon which Cole based his conclusion that the evidence for the existence

of homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz “just isn’t there,” and that “the evidence that does exist

calls that claim into question.”

2. The Chemistry of Auschwitz, by, well, myself.[8] This 440-page book summarizes the

documentary situation succinctly (which saves you having to read the 750 pages of the

first book mentioned) and forensically evaluates various kinds of material evidence of the

purported crime scene.

There are many more studies that could be listed, but the interested reader

can learn about them when perusing the two works just mentioned.

The upshot of all these studies is quite simply that there cannot have been any homicidal

gas chambers at Auschwitz. The forensic and documentary evidence positively refutes even

the possibility of their existence.

This brings us to Point b. If the selections where not designed to send people to the gas

chambers, what purpose did they serve? Well, if a camp received hundreds of inmates

in one swoop, what was the SS supposed to do? Just let those deportees walk in and do

whatever they pleased? Some kind of admission procedure had to be in place where it was

figured out which deportee was to be lodged in which building in which part of the camp, or

who of them will even be sent to another camp. Such an admission procedure happens in

every prison and camp in every country. That wasn’t any different at Auschwitz. Having

physicians involved to assess the health of incoming deportees makes sense, too. A detailed

analysis of the surviving documentation clearly shows in this regard as well that

there was nothing sinister or unusual about those selections at Auschwitz.[9]

Witnesses

Cover art for an upcoming study of the testimonies of one of

the key witnesses propping up the orthodox Auschwitz narrative.

 

But what about all those witnesses? Well, if we look into witnesses who testified about their

experiences with Dr. Mengele right at the end of the war, before memories got corrupted

by the Mengele hysteria starting at the late 1970s/early 1980s, there is really only one witness

saying anything of substance: the Jewish physician Miklos Nyiszli from Hungary, who for

several months of his incarceration at Auschwitz was the assistant of Dr. Mengele, if we are

to believe him.

The late German mainstream historian and expert of Third Reich history Prof. Dr. Werner Maser

said about Nyiszli simply that he “lied excessively.”[10] He didn’t justify this harsh assessment,

however, because that would have required citing the writings of heretics, which Maser didn’t

want to do to prevent getting himself in trouble (so he admitted to me). In his above-quoted paper

on Mengele, Mattogno gave a brief summary of the main reasons why Nyiszli was indeed an

imposter and excessive liar. The reader interested in a thorough, 300-page critique of Nyiszli’s

various tall tales in English will have to wait until later this year, though, when a study dedicated to this key

witness is slated to appear.[11]

The Legacy

A drawing of a prisoner showing Dr. Wirths, garrison physician at Auschwitz between September

1942 and early 1945, as a knight in shining uniform battling against lice infestation and thus typhus

 

Mengele is special, so special, indeed, that this is the only uncommon German last name my

English spell checker doesn’t complain about. Like blitzkrieg and Auschwitz, this term

has become a fixed part of the English language. What a proud legacy of a reviled

concentration-camp physician!

In Mengele’s case, however, it is safe to say that this isn’t his fault. As Wikipedia writes

correctly, quoting the one book that was most influential in cementing the Mengele hysteria:[12]

Mengele was a deputy of the Auschwitz garrison physician Dr. Eduard Wirths. Wirths,

in turn, was celebrated by hundreds of Auschwitz inmates as a hero, as the “Angel of Auschwitz”

saving the lives of tens of thousands of them with his selfless efforts to improve their lot and

to battle the epidemics reaping a gruesome harvest at Auschwitz.[13] Mengele was Wirths’s

right-hand man – in the battle to save as many lives as possible of those whom the

authorities of the Third Reich had recklessly and irresponsibly deported to Auschwitz.

Mengele was not just innocent of the crimes he is accused of. Together with Eduard Wirths

and the other physicians at Auschwitz, his tireless efforts saved the lives of ten thousands of inmates.