Thought and Speech Crimes:

The Disturbing Case of Revisionist Ursula Haverbeck

May 8, 2018    Thomas Müller

Forty percent of American millennials (ages 20-36) believe the government should intervene when citizens say something that might be considered offensive to minorities, a Pew Research study reveals. It is not entirely clear what is meant by “intervene” and “minorities,” and the term “offensive” is broadly defined. As usual in the world of Newspeak we go to our standby- the dictionary. Offensive: causing someone to feel resentful, upset, or annoyed. Wow, the eggshell world is here.

Intuitively, the question likely pertains to the sort of nonsense we are seeing involving censorship and public persecution of those who espouse views that are deemed “politically incorrect.”

Despite the threat of political correctness (PC) from millennials, Americans overall still put a high value on free speech, with only 28% in favor of government regulation of speech. Among respondents, 27 percent of Gen Xers (37-52), 24 percent of Baby Boomers (ages 53-71) and 12 percent of the Silent Generation (age 72 and older) believe government should control and limit offensive speech. The dwindling Greatest Generation universally defends free speech, but they are now over age 90.

In Germany, a troubling 70% are in favor of limiting free speech. That country will jail those who engage even in revisionist history involving WWII, and even debate on the Holocaust is considered taboo. In fact, it is illegal in Germany to deny or even downplay the Holocaust. The term deny is curious given that no leading revisionist on the topic actually denies atrocities or actions against Jews and others.

Understanding of the Case of Ursula Haverbeck

89 year old Ursula Haverbeck was supposed to report to prison to serve a two year sentence for “holocaust denial”. Instead she is on the run, presumably sheltered away someplace by supporters. The Jewish ‘International Auschwitz Committee’, apparently oblivious to the bad optics, is asking German police to use ‘high pressure’ to hunt down and imprison this elderly woman.

Update: Ursula apparently went back to her home after five days on the run, and police hauled her to prison.

Ursula Haverbeck was sentenced for violating section 220a [see below]. For a woman of her advanced age, this is the equivalent of a death sentence.

The following video is the interview that got her into hot water. Watch it before it’s removed from the Internet.

Apparently, “downplay” is double-speak for revisionism. Watch the interview closely, as if you were on the jury. Nowhere does Haverbeck deny that crimes or atrocities were committed against Jews (and others), nor does she refuse to accept that they were rounded up or persecuted. Rather, she speaks mostly about the nature, methods and the numbers, which is deemed “revisionism.”

The following is an excerpt from the German law, and what a broad and sweeping law it is. In essence, it demands no one disturb the public peace, ruffle feathers or challenge a history that has been deemed set in stone or static.

Please, watch Haverbeck for yourself. See if you can identify her so-called offensive words that “might disturb the public peace.” In fact, Haverbeck was remarkably well composed and was relatively careful in her word choice. Despite the news coverage on her imprisonment, I certainly didn’t hear her “approve of” atrocities or claim they didn’t happen. Do you hear her “rendering harmless” acts committed under the rule of National Socialism?

She did go into the rarely discussed — but I think much-needed — topic of the mass murder (Hellstorm) of German civilians and POWs as the war wound down and after the defeat of Germany. Basically, she is “guilty” of processing things outside of the box and not functioning under prescribed terms. Her “revisionism” only involves researching and questioning the size and degree of atrocities against Jews and the aspects of the Hellstorm.

She did suggest that truth or history on these topic has been “distorted.” She uses the term “Das Groste Problem” to define this distortion. This is problematic in her eyes because this historical distortion has been used as an agenda to kowtow Germany and promote Zionist power.

I’m sorry, but I don’t see “The Great Problem” train of thought as a jailable crime. I don’t see being an aggressive revisionist as being a jailable crime either. Nor is hurting someone’s feelings a jailable offense. Any sensible observer would say that ALL history has been distorted to one degree or another and should be subjected to frequent revision, review and question. Nothing should be set in stone.

Courageous Jewish historian Norman Finkelstein has addressed the issue of shaping history and ranking human suffering (uniqueness doctrine) to achieve questionable agendas as it relates to Palestine. This is also what Haverbeck challenged.

To help set the facts straight on this case, I believe Haverbeck essentially adopted the work of the French historian Paul Rassinier and probably also French historian Robert Faurisson. The latter focused on the so-called confessions of Auschwitz commandant Rudolf Hoess under severe torture. Since his death, some of his views (such as no gassing in camps within Germany) have quietly been accepted with little notice by the mainstream Holocaust historians. Haverbeck is not an original researcher but has picked up the mantel. Incidentally, Amazon just purged the works of these historians from their online marketplace.

TNN has no intention of going into the thought police tarpit of discussion on Rassinier and Faurisson’s outlawed historical revisionism. We have no strong conviction one way or the other and, like most events, especially when the victors write the history, there are shades of grey. There is far too much false dichotomy on both sides of the issue.  We do find the notion of a court approved version of events that one could lose their liberty over beyond Orwellian. The “judge” would not permit testimony from a revisionist historian in court. It is fundamental that there should be open discussion, even of controversial views, without threat of prosecution. But if the authorities are willing to make an example out of an 89-year-old woman, well, what more is there to say.

Mind-Blowing Comments in Joseph Goebbels’ Diaries

I don’t claim to have the answers. But something popped up while reading through the Goebbels Diaries that blew my mind. In the diary there is a reference to Hungary. And it looks like Goebbels the insider and one of Hitler’s closest confidants thinks something completely different is going on. According to the official narrative the deportation of the Hungarian Jews began on April 29, 1944 when a train load of Jews were sent to Birkenau. In ten short weeks 400,000 were alleged gassed there.

Did Goebbels not get the word of such a major operation? Curious comments indeed. Some claim Goebbels was lying to avoid incrimination. But Goebbels bluntly said plenty in his diaries to incriminate himself, and had no intention of ever appearing as a defendant before a tribunal.

The notion that the vast majority of Jews sat around passively awaiting their fate is a myth. The Jewish Telegraph Agency has numerous stories of evacuations as the eastern front advanced. See: [Jewish News Archive, 7/8-1941; 45,000 Bukovina Jews Evacuated to Soviet Interior]and [Jewish News Archive 2/18/1942, Uzbekistan Becomes New Home for Hundreds of Thousands of Evacuated Jews] or fought back.

Apparently Goebbels didn’t have any idea about the scale of any killing operations against Jews either.

Later, indeed these Jewish ghettos near armament factories were bombed by the Allies. One Hungarian Jew in the Yad Vashem interviews who was conscripted to work on the Carpathian fortifications stated that his grandparents and sister were killed in such a Budapest raid.

We do find it deeply disturbing that Haverbeck is to be imprisoned at all. And what of those who simply defend free speech and the right of Haverbeck to conduct this interview without prosecution and jail time? Are they, too, going to be subjected via some contorted circular logic leading to derision, ridicule or even prosecution?

Support for Ursula Haverbeck can be provided here.

___________________________________________________

UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights: Everyone has the right to freedom of

opinion and expression; this right includes the right to hold opinions without

interference and to seek, receive and impart informational

and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.

ON NOVEMBER 9 a woman who has led a blameless life will spend her 91^st birthday

in a German prison. Frau Ursula Haverbeck is the conscience of the self-styled free world.

The unassuming grandmother was last year again gaoled for expressing her opinion.

Only in the grotesque European Union is it possible for ordinary people who have led

blameless lives to be fed into the cruellest of prison regimes for

periods up to five years for speaking out against perceived injustice.

The aged lady was gaoled for defending her nation’s honour. She described the official

holocaust narrative as a fraud and a blood libel. Yet, those who admit

or been found guilty of holocaust fraud have not been imprisoned.

Frau Ursula Haverbeck is one of growing millions who today question the victors’ version

of the so-called holocaust; Germany is still an occupied country. To their credit,

many prominent Jews also pour scorn on the cash chamber myths.

Free inquiry requires that we tolerate diversity of opinion and that we respect

the right of individuals to express their beliefs, however unpopular they may be,

without social or legal prohibition or fear of success.

~ Paul Kurtz Source: A Secular Humanist Declaration, in On the Barricades, 1989.

WRITE TO URSULA AND CHEER HER UP:

Frau Ursula Haverbeck, JVA Bielefeld-Brackwede, Umlostrasse 100, D-33649, Germany.

Richard Lynn the Professor Emeritus University of Ulster writes: 

‘I have checked out Winston Churchill’s Second World War and the statement is quite correct.'

There is not a single mention of Nazi gas chambers, genocide of the Jews, or of six million

Jewish victims of the war. Eisenhower’s Crusade in Europe is a book of 559 pages; the six

volumes of Churchill’s Second World War total 4,448 pages;

and de Gaulle’s three-volume Mémoires de Guerre is 2,054 pages.

In this mass of writing, which altogether totals 7,061 pages (not including the introductory parts),

published from 1948 to 1959, one will find no mention either of Nazi gas

chambers, a genocide of the Jews, or of six million Jewish victims of the war.’

Perhaps these three warlords should be charged with holocaust denial as with hundreds

of historians, researchers, journalists, people who simply want holocaust exaggeration and fraud investigated.

An often overlooked question that is relevant to the holocaust debate.  Should exposure

and lack of credibility in the myth of the six million become overwhelming ~ and we are

close to the tipping point, could journalists and palace historians be charged with complicity in abetting fraud?

Here’s freedom to him who would speak; here’s freedom to him who would write;

for there’s none ever feared that the truth should be heard;

save he who the truth would indict! ~ ROBERT BURNS.

Do not allow yourself to be diverted and distracted by the ‘did it happen or not happen’

smokescreen.  Instead, ask yourself, should Europe back-pedal to an age

in which innocent women were burned at the stake or drowned for heresy.

By what right do the political elite incarcerate people for their sincerely held beliefs?

The mind-set of the judiciary and their abhorrent cheer-leading media is reminiscent of

medieval times when harsh punishment was inflicted on those who dared challenge the official narrative.

Frau Ursula Haverbeck is persecuted as were great thinkers like Alexander Solzhenitsyn,

Knut Hamsun, journalist Julian Assange and whistle-blowers like Edward Snowden.

PROTEST FOR URSULA HAVERBECK

A nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and

falsehood is a nation afraid of its people.’

~ President J. F. Kennedy.

The Jewish community challenges the right of a ‘Martyrs for justice’ protest in support of

Frau Haverbeck in Bielefeld on November 9 where the elderly martyr is caged. To support

justice and free speech it is not necessary for you to travel to Bielefeld as Bielefeld is your laptop’s keyboard.

Wherever you are in the world, use this news story to inspire letters to the press.

The more spirited and active might organise protests outside German embassies and

consulates. Five or six people are enough. A press release setting

out the reason for your protest will be seen by tens of thousands.

Exposure is what persecutors of Frau Haverbeck fear. As a bonus, the massive publicity

will inspire people to see what all the fuss is about. Thanks to the freer internet, millions

will see for themselves how they have been fooled by what

has been described as the most successful hoax in history.

CHEER URSULA UP WITH A NICE LETTER: Frau Ursula Haverbeck, JVA Bielefeld-Brackwede, Umlostrasse 100, D-33649, Germany.

 WATCH VIDEO: URSULA HAVERBECK INTERVIEW 

Write to Ursula Haverbeck at the following address:

JVA Bielefeld-Brackwede

z. Hd. Ursula Haverbeck

Umlostraße 100

33649 Bielefeld

GERMANY