|
|
Click on this text to watch, Joe Rogan DESTROYS Circumcision IF YOU THINK GOD MADE A MISTAKE BY PROVIDING A FORESKIN, THEN THINK SOME MORE Click on this link to watch IS CIRCUMCISION A FRAUD? . . Click on this text to visit the ant-circumcision site Intact America ... . .
The Apostle Paul said:
__________________________________________ "By the act of circumcision, the Jew shows his hatred towards nature and the natural order. By this bloody, cruel, senseless act, he shows his cruelty and sadism, and that he will stop at nothing to obtain his ends. Surely the Jews are also behind the Islamic circumcision, which serves as an ideal cover and distraction from their own wickedness in this regard."
...Bobby Fischer (Grandmaster Chess Champion)  The Circumcision Phallacy To begin my historical and contemporary exposé of Jewish Zionist control of America, I’ll begin with a glaring example of control that everyone is aware of, but far too few ever bother to examine the history of, or basic reason for it. And that is the totally unnecessary and barbarous practice of male circumcision. If you believe that Jews have no inordinate influence in America just think about circumcision for starters. The following is from an article that appeared in the New York Times on September 12 th , 2012, by Sharon Otterman, titled: Denouncing City’s Move to Regulate Circumcision "The grandmother carried the sleeping infant boy on a white pillow toward the synagogue’s altar, and passed him to her son. The son carried the infant toward the mohel, or Jewish ritual circumciser, who stood amid a cluster of chanting men. The mohel lifted the infant’s clothing to expose his tiny penis. With a rapid flick of a two-sided scalpel, the mohel sliced off the foreskin and held it between his fingers. Then he took a sip of red wine from a cup and bent his head. He placed his lips below the cut, around the base of the baby’s penis, for a split second, creating suction, and then let the wine spill from his mouth out over the wound. The mohel, A. Romi Cohn, then assured the infant that he was O.K. The infant stop crying after a while and the sanctuary filled with elated prayer. Mr. Cohn claims to have performed more than 25,000 circumcisions, on babies and adults [which raises a question related to the procedure performed on adults], in New York City and elsewhere over the last 40 years. He said that whenever he circumcises an infant he always puts his mouth on the baby’s penis to pull blood away from the wound as part of an ancient ritual known in Hebrew as metzitzah b’peh. It is still commonplace in parts of the ultra-Orthodox Jewish community, but is rare in other branches of Judaism. Of course Mr. Cohn, who has written a textbook on the subject, always rinses his mouth with antiseptic before a circumcision. New York City’s health department estimated that there are some 3,600 local circumcisions each year incorporating the metzitzah b’peh ritual. The health department said that, between 2000 and 2011, eleven babies contracted herpes as a result and two of them died. Consequently the Center for Disease Control and Prevention declared that the procedure is unsafe as it creates a risk of transmitting herpes and other pathogens. The N.Y.C. Board of Health was scheduled to vote on a proposal that would require parents to sign a consent form indicating that they are aware of the rise of herpes transmission when a circumcision procedure, or bris, includes direct oral contact. Mr. Cohn, 83, flatly stated that he would rather go to jail than comply with the consent requirement. He acknowledged that there are unqualified circumcisers working without proper health testing and training, but he believes that the ritual is perfectly safe when performed by him or another practitioner certified by the American Board of Ritual Circumcision (ABORC). Mr. Cohn is the chairman of ABORC which assures anyone concerned that circumcision has been a central tenet of the Jewish faith since time immemorial and constitutes a sacred and immutable covenant between the Jewish people and the Creator [even though the Creator created the foreskin for good reasons]. 'If you follow strictly the ritual, there will be no harm to the baby,” Cohn said. “A circumcision is a joyous occasion – nothing traumatic about it.'” [This is what any twisted psychopath would say when speaking for himself about the pain of others].  What almost no one knows about circumcision is that it became widespread as a measure to curb masturbation, which, considered a vice in its own right, was also thought to be responsible for an array of crippling conditions, from epilepsy to digestive dysfunction to muscle atrophy. Below are a list of quotes from esteemed physicians of their day, which speak to, in no uncertain terms, their intent to make circumcision a painful, traumatic procedure, and to ensure that the result be a permanent loss in sensitivity.
“In cases of masturbation we must, I believe, break the habit by inducing such a condition of the parts as will cause too much local suffering to allow of the practice to be continued. For this purpose, if the prepuce is long, we may circumcise the male patient with present and probably with future advantages; the operation, too, should not be performed under chloroform, so that the pain experienced may be associated with the habit we wish to eradicate.” On An Injurious Habit Occasionally Met with in Infancy and Early Childhood, Athol A. W. Johnson. The Lancet, vol. 1 (7 April 1860): pp. 344-345.
“A remedy for masturbation which is almost always successful in small boys is circumcision. The operation should be performed without administering anesthetic, as the brief pain attending the operation will have a salutary effect upon the mind, especially, if it is connected with the idea of punishment, as it may well be in some cases.” John Harvey Kellogg, creator of the Corn Flake, Treatment for Self-Abuse and Its Effects, Plain Facts for Old and Young,” Burlington, Iowa: P. Segner & Co. 1888, p. 295.
“Measures more radical than circumcision would, if public opinion permitted their adoption, be a true kindness to many patients of both sexes.” Jonathan Hutchinson, On Circumcision as Preventative of Masturbation, Archives of Surgery, Vol. 2 (1891): pp. 267-268.
“Another advantage of circumcision… is the lessened liability to masturbation. A long foreskin is irritating per se, as it necessitates more manipulation of the parts in bathing… This leads the child to handle the parts, and as a rule, pleasurable sensations are elicited from the extremely sensitive mucous membrane, with resultant manipulation and masturbation. The exposure of the glans penis following circumcision … lessens the sensitiveness of the organ… It therefore lies with the physician, the family adviser in affairs of hygiene and medical, to urge its acceptance.” Ernest G. Mark, Circumcision, American Practitioner and News, vol. 31 (1901): p. 231.
“Frequent micturition [urination], loss of flesh, convulsions, phosphatic calculus, hernia, nervous exhaustion, dyspepsia, diarrhea, prolapse of rectum, balanitis, acute phimosis and masturbation are all conditions induced by the constricted long prepuce, and all to be rapidly remedied by the simple operation of circumcision.” H. G. H. Naylor, A Plea for Early Circumcision, Pediatrics, vol. 12 (1901): p. 231
“It is generally accepted that irritation derived from a tight prepuce may be followed by nervous phenomena, among these being convulsions and outbreaks resembling epilepsy. It is therefore not at all improbable that in many infants who die in convulsions, the real cause of death is a long or tight prepuce.” A.L. Wolbarst, MD. “Universal Circumcision as a Sanitary Measure.” Journal of the American Medical Association, (1914) Vol.62. pp.92-97.
“The prepuce is one of the great factors in causing masturbation in boys. Here is the dilemma we are in: If we do not teach the growing boy to pull the prepuce back and cleanse the glans there is danger of smegma collecting and of adhesions and ulcerations forming, which in their turn will cause irritation likely to lead to masturbation. If we do teach the boy to pull the prepuce back and cleans his glans, that handling alone is sufficient gradually and almost without the boy’s knowledge to initiate him into the habit of masturbation… Therefore, off with the prepuce!” William J. Robinson, Circumcision and Masturbation, Medical World, vol.33 (1915): p.390.
“I suggest that all male children should be circumcised. This is “against nature”, but that is exactly the reason why it should be done. Nature intends that the adolescent male shall copulate as often and as promiscuously as possible, and to that end covers the sensitive glans so that it shall be ever ready to receive stimuli. Civilization, on the contrary, requires chastity, and the glans of the circumcised rapidly assumes a leathery texture less sensitive than skin. Thus the adolescent has his attention drawn to his penis much less often. I am convinced that masturbation is much less common in the circumcised. With these considerations in view it does not seem apt to argue that ‘God knows best how to make little boys.'” R.W. Cockshut. Circumcision. British Medical Journal, Vol.2 (1935): p.764. Now give some thought
as to why the majority of non- Jewish American infants were, and are, routinely circumcised. And don’t parrot the horseshit about how circumcision is a hedge against disease and cancer, or it reduces promiscuity. In fact, removing the foreskin promotes promiscuity; the circumcised penis has no “sheath” to protect the sensitive penis glans from rubbing against garments causing inconvenient erections. God did not provide a protective foreskin for the penis so that it could be removed in a barbaric procedure, or a religious ritual, without the benefit of anesthetics. And who the hell are these Jews who presume to know better than Mother Nature what is good for humankind... or MANkind in particular? How did this circumcision crap get started in America, and to a lesser degree in Canada and Australia, anyway? Evidently it goes back to the Ancient Egyptians, Muslims and Semites. The Semites supposedly started the practice in order to make a covenant with God; which seems to me like an asinine means to make a covenant with anyone, especially God. If you ask a Jew why they still do it, you’ll be told that, “It’s a tradition that goes back to the days of King David.” Or, “Circumcision is the key ordinance identifying Jews as the chosen people of God”... As if that justifies it... And what a peculiar means of identification. I would prefer facial tattoos like some Pacific islanders or cutting off a pinky finger like the Japanese Yakuza, or wearing a correctly wrapped turban, rather than have my penis mutilated! I even personally know a Mexican-American man who had a circumcision performed upon him in adulthood so that he would “fit in.” He was in miserable pain for weeks, but by God he finally “fit in.” Such is an example of the thoroughness of the brain-washing undergone by Americans through disinformation and the repetitive adherence to a lie. Repeat a lie often enough and long enough and it will become the unshakable truth. The practice of circumcision in America did not gain any traction until 1914, when a New York City Jewish doctor, Abraham Wolbarst, began a crusade for universal circumcision as a preventative of syphilis, cancer and masturbation with his article that appeared in the Journal of the American Medical Association, (Vol. 62, 1914, pp. 92-97). There were others before him such as Dr. Lewis A. Sayre, who in 1870, mistakenly announced that circumcision was a cure for polio, epilepsy and masturbation. In 1877, Dr. John Harvey Kellogg (of Battle Creek, Michigan mind you) published the first edition of, "Plain Facts for Old and Young", in which he promoted circumcision as a cure for masturbation. He wrote, “The operation is to be performed without administering anesthetic, as the brief pain attending the operation will have a salutary effect upon the mind, especially if it be connected with the idea of punishment.” I, for one, would like to find out where Kellogg’s grave is so I can go piss on it with my circumcised penis! Dr. Wolbarst again influenced the medical community with a 1932 article stating that smegma causes cancer of the penis, also cancer of the cervix of female partners of infected males, and circumcision was the logical preventive measure. But still, non-Jewish Americans were very reluctant to have their male infant’s penis mutilated. Penile smegma can be prevented by pulling back the foreskin and washing the glans area. After all, you don’t cut off your hands when they are unclean, you wash them. Then, in 1935, two Jewish Americans in New York, Dr. Hiram Yellin and an inventor, Aaron Goldstein, introduced their invention, the Gomco Clamp. This circumcision device was a scissors-like clamp consisting of a metal bell and a flat plate with a hole in it, brought together with a screw to apply circular crushing and fusing force at the position of excision. Gomco was the name of Aaron Goldstein’s manufacturing company (Goldstein Manufacturing Company) that promoted the circumcision device in all of the modern medical journals as a safe, relatively painless means of circumcision. The wound caused by the bloodless procedure would reportedly heal in thirty- six hours. With the introduction of the Gomco Clamp, and incessant propaganda perpetrated in medical journals, circumcision in America became almost routinely automatic by 1950. Between 1950 and 1980, 90% of American male infants were automatically circumcised, most often without consulting the parents, especially in urban areas. The procedure became so commonplace in America that when U.S. troops began the occupation of South Korea in 1950, any South Koreans were influenced to adopt routine circumcision. _____________________________________________  The
procedure began losing popularity in the 1980s as reasonable American parents of newborn male children began questioning the ridiculously barbarous practice and refused their consent. The percentage of present circumcision is about 80% and dropping. The practice is unheard of in countries such as China and India where over two billion people can’t be wrong. Europeans, Mexicans, South Americans, and most non- Muslim African countries do not practice routine circumcision. The Aussies and Canadians still have a high incidence of circumcision, but the practice is rapidly losing popularity in those countries as well. Americans mutilate their male children’s penises out of fear of non-existent complications from disease; and it’s done to conform to the “accepted norm.” Ask any American female which she prefers to look at, a circumcised penis or a natural penis. The answer is rarely natural. American females have been conditioned to prefer the sight of a circumcised penis that more closely resembles an erect penis in the first place. Go figure. Now... why would Jews want Americans to be circum- cised? It wouldn’t be to have Americans make a covenant with God as more chosen people... right? It wouldn’t be to save Americans from the scourge of cancer, syphilis, masturbation, or promiscuity, because there is no relation to these scourges and an advantage of circumcision at all. It wasn’t really all about selling a lot of Gomco Clamps was it? No, it wasn’t about any of these scenarios! Jews, as a tribal group, have been regularly expelled, primarily for usury, subversion and treason, from many countries, kingdoms, principalities and city-states in Europe, and elsewhere, over the past one-thousand years. Most notably were the expulsions by St. Cyril from Alexandria in 415 A.D., the expulsion by Emperor Henry II of Germany from Mainz in 1012 , which began the persecution of Jews in Germany, the 1290 expulsion from England, the 1306 expulsion from France, the 1492 expulsion by Ferdinand and Isabella of Spain (The Inquisition), the 1569 expulsion from all Papal states by Pope Pius V, the 1593 expulsions from Italy and Bavaria, the Russian pogroms that began in 1881and continued through the Russian revolution of the early Twentieth Century; and of course, the German expulsion prior to and during WWII. BTW: The participation of primarily Jewish Americans in the horrors of 9/11 is a perfect example of Jewish treason and subversion. The primary method used to identify Jewish men, throughout this continuing history of expulsion, was to require a suspected male Jew to expose his penis for examination. If the penis was circumcised, then a conclusive identification was made. Here is a statement from the autobiography of David R. Katz: “The Germans made men drop their pants, even in the middle of a crowded street, in order to discover if they were circumcised or not.” www.holocaust-trc.org./dkatz_autobio.html Also: “Jewish men, unlike their non-Jewish counterparts [in the WWII resistance movement], were circumcised and therefore could be easily identified.” www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org./source/holocaust/partisan. 1.html Some Jewish European men sought out underground foreskin restoration operations as a means of eluding German persecution. Skin from the scrotum can indeed be grafted to the penis to fashion a foreskin and, if time is on your side, there are skin stretching methods (see Dual Tension Restorer) to form a new foreskin. In 1982, an American group called Brothers United for Future Foreskin (BUFF) was formed which publicized the use of tape in non-surgical foreskin restoration. IIn 1991, another group was formed called UNCircumcising Information and Resources Centers (UNCIRC). And, as humorous as it may be to some, in 1994, UNCIRC was incorporated into a group known as The National Organization of Restoring Men (NORM) which was originally called RECAP, an acronym for the group identified by the phrase Recover a Penis. An informative anti-circumcision website is: <intactamerica.org> the site is currently maintained. Anyway... Dr. Wolbarst, Dr. Yellin, and Aaron Goldstein, amongst others, were well aware of the identification method used in the European expulsions and were determined to confuse the identification method by instigating and enabling the circumcision of tens of millions of non-Jewish American male infants. Jewish influence in Canada and Australia enhanced the popularity of circumcision as a means of Jewish identification confusion in those countries as well. And before we continue with what Germany did to the Jews, let’s examine what some Jews did to Germany to piss the Germans off in the first place. After all, how often have you heard the question, “Why were the Germans so murderously angry at the Jews?” It wasn’t because Hitler was anti-Semitic for no good reason and forced his countrymen to expel the German Jews or else.  German court rules circumcision is 'bodily harm'
A court in Germany has ruled that circumcising young boys for religious reasons amounts to bodily harm. In a decision that has caused outrage among Jewish and Muslim groups,the court said that a child's right to physical integrity trumps religious and parental rights.The case involved a doctor who carried out a circumcision on a four year-old that led to medical complications. Thousands of Muslim and Jewish boys are circumcised in Germany every year.Although male circumcision - unlike female circumcision - is not illegal in Germany,the court's judgement said the "fundamental right of the child to bodily integrityoutweighed the fundamental rights of the parents".Circumcision, it decided, contravenes "interests of the child todecide later in life on his religious beliefs".
'Protect religious freedom'
The doctor involved in the case was acquitted and the ruling is not binding, but correspondents say it sets a precedent that would be taken into account by other German courts.The president of Germany's Central Council of Jews, Dieter Graumann,called it "an unprecedented and dramatic intervention in the right of religious communities to self-determination".He urged the country's parliament to clarify the legal situation "to protect religious freedom against attacks".
Male circumcision is part of the ancient religious rituals of both the Jewish and Muslim faiths, as well as the traditions of some tribal groups. In some countries, such as the United States,it is also not uncommon for parents to request that young boys are circumcised for health reasons. The BBC's Stephen Evans in Germany says it is unclear what the next legal step will be, but this issue is a moral and political minefield.
|
